alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,731
<SECURITIES>                                     3,227
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (347)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,031
<PP&E>                                           4,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,673)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,589
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,790)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,379
<SALES>                                          3,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,765
<CGS>                                            2,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (289)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,431)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
#### IN RE: James Dow VANDIVERE, Petitioner.

No. 17-1985

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

James Dow Vandivere, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Dow Vandivere has filed an original petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), challenging the legality of his commitment to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (2012) and seeking release. This court ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Currently pending in this court is Vandi-vere’s appeal of the district court’s order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4248. An original habeas petition filed in this court cannot serve as a substitute for a properly filed appeal. Accordingly, we find that the interests of justice would not be served by transferring this case to the district court. *See*28 U.S.C. .§ 1631 (2012); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED*
#### Ibraahim Muhammad IBRO, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60623 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 11, 2017

Aaron Samuel Haas, Salmon & Haas, San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner

Gregory A. Pennington, Jr., Esq., Trial Attorney, Brooke Marie Maurer, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/OIL, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ibraahim Muhammad Ibro, a native and citizen of Ethiopia who entered the United States without admission or parole, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the denial of his application *783for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). With respect to his asylum and withholding-of-removal claims, Ibro challenges the immigration judge’s finding that his testimony was not credible, but he fails to show that it is plain from the totality of the circumstances that “no reasonable fact-finder could make such an adverse credibility ruling.” *Wang v. Holder,*569 F.3d 531, 538 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The BIA found it unnecessary to review the merits of his claims apart from the-, adverse credibility finding, which was fatal to the claims. Likewise, we conclude that the denial of relief turned on the assessment of Ibro’s credibility. *See Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994).

In addition, Ibro challenges the adverse credibility determination in the context of his CAT claim. Again, he has not shown that “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); see *Zhang v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 339, 344-45 (5th Cir. 2005).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5,4.
EXHIBIT 21.1

BIGBAND NETWORKS, INC.

Direct Subsidiaries at December 31, 2007

Foreign and Domestic



|                                                                                 |  |                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                                       |  | Jurisdiction              
|BigBand Networks International, Inc.                                             |  | Delaware                  
|BigBand Networks Ltd.                                                            |  | Israel                    
|Bigband Networks (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd.                                             |  | Peoples Republic of China
|BigBand Deutschland GmbH (subsidiary of BigBand Networks International, Inc.)    |  | Germany                   
|BigBand Networks UK Limited (subsidiary of BigBand Networks International, Inc.) |  | United Kingdom
Docket Operations, M­30

U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Room W12­140, West Building Ground Floor

Washington, DC 20590­0001

REFERENCE: YUNEEQ Q500 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

http://yuneec.com/support/manuals/q500plus.html

To Whom It May Concern:

Enclosed please find a request for amendment to exemption filed under Section 333 of the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 to allow commercial operations of unmanned

aircraft for aerial data collection.

I request that you consider this proposed amendment for summary grant based upon my existing

333 exemption (Exemption No. 11405; Regulatory Docket No. FAA­2015­0118) for use of additional aircraft

based upon exemptions previously granted utilizing the same or similar make and model of aircraft. This

proposed amendment does not impact the conditions, reasons relative to public interest or safety as outlined

in the original exemption request.

Should you or your staff have any questions, please contact me. Thank you for your time and

consideration.

Sincerely,

Bryan Cherry
Aircraft to be added YUNEEC Q500 TYPHOON

The YUNEEQ Q500 TYPHOON is a hobby grade rotorcraft in the quadcopter configuration designed to

carry aloft a high definition camera for the purpose of aerial imaging. It has multiple advanced safety

features including a no fly areas, multiple failsafe modes, geo fencing and altitude restrictions. Specific

details are located in the attachments
Specifications

1. Flight Time

2. Up to 25 Minutes

3. Dimension

4. 16.5x16.5x9.5in (420x420x240mm)

5. Diagonal Length Without Rotor Blades

6. 22.2in (565mm)

7. Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter

8. 13.0in (330mm)

9. Weight Without Battery and Payload

10. 40.0oz (1130g)

11. Battery

12. 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included)

13. Charger

14. 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included)

15. Transmitter

16. 10­channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included)

17. 3 Flight Modes

18. Smart, Angle and Home Modes

19. Maximum Flying Height

20. Default 122m (400ft) Above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Q500 GUI)

21. Maximum Rotation Rate

22. 65°/s

23. Maximum Roll Angle

24. 35°

25. Operating Temperature Range

26. -5°C to 80°C
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6282 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, as the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. 

Brown, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. SERRANO (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. TONKO, Ms. MENG, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. KATKO, 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. HANNA, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY

of New York, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. COLLINS

of New York, Mr. DONOVAN, Mr. GIBSON, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. 

REED, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. ZELDIN, and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DR. ROSCOE C. BROWN, JR. POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6282 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. 

2 Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, 

7 Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: June 16 , 2014 Call with the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of

Environmental Quality regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A brief call was made by EPA to the Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality on June 16 , 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants , which was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES** Participant : Peggy Hatch (L DEQ Secretary) EPA Participant : Ron Curry (Regional Administrator)
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03946]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Clinical Center; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors of the NIH Clinical Center.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and 
evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by 
the CLINICAL CENTER, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH 
Clinical Center.
    Date: March 28, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate department of Perioperative 
Medicine Pain and Palliative Care Service and Interviews.
    Place: Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ronald Neumann, MD, Senior Investigation, 
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-6455, [email protected].

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors of the NIH 
Clinical Center.
    Date: March 29, 2022.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate department of Perioperative 
Medicine Pain and Palliative Care Service and Interviews.
    Place: Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ronald Neumann, MD, Senior Investigation, 
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-6455, [email protected].

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

    Dated: February 18, 2022.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03946 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2010-1095 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2009-NE-40-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP2967EN-E (1/5//11)

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Luellying CAPEHART, III Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-1405

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 31, 2017

Filed: November 14, 2017

Amber M. Brennan, Lolita A. Velazquez-Aguilu, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

James Luellying Capehart, III, Pro Se

Matthew James Mankey, Mankey Law Office, Golden Valley, MN, for Defendant-Appellant

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James Luellying Capehart directly appeals the 124-month sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, pursuant to a plea agreement that contained a waiver of the right to appeal a sentence of less than 154 months. Capehart’s counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is valid, applicable, and enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfriv-olous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Amendment to Scott D. Peters Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT 
 to 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of May 16, 2012, by and between Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
“Corporation”), and Scott D. Peters (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Executive is
currently employed by the Corporation pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 
 1. Section 5 of the
Agreement is hereby amended to delete the section entitled “Other Compensation - Equity Interest” in its entirety. 

2. Section 8 of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following paragraph to such section: 

“Termination Following Change in Control 

In the event of a Change in Control (as such term is defined under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2006 Incentive
Plan), the Executive may, at any time on or within the period of ninety (90) days following the consummation of such transaction, voluntarily terminate his employment with the Company (or its successor or any of their respective affiliates) for
any reason or no reason, and following such a termination of his employment, the Executive will be entitled to the Separation Benefits (as defined in this Section 8) upon the conditions set forth herein. The Company shall have no further
obligations to the Executive under this Agreement or otherwise (other than pursuant to any employee benefit plan).” 
 3. Section 8 of the Agreement is hereby further amended to provide that (a) the “Release” referred to in such section must be executed by the Executive within 45 days after the
Executive’s Date of Termination (as defined therein) and must not be revoked by the Executive within any revocation period provided by applicable law, (b) if the Executive is entitled to receive cash severance pursuant to such section,
such severance shall be paid in a lump sum on the sixtieth (60th) day following the Executive’s Date of Termination, and (c) the fourth paragraph of the “Provisions Regarding Code Section 409A” in Section 10 of the Agreement is
hereby deleted in its entirety. 
 4. Except as expressly modified herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
in accordance with its original terms. 
 5. Capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Agreement. 







 6. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
 [Remainder of page intentionally left
blank] 

  
 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered
on the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	HEALTHCARE TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	[Name]	 	
	[Title]	 	
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	  

	Scott D. Peters



  
 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from MoneyGram
Payment Systems, Inc.'s Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 1997 and is qualified
entirely by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                   22,931 
<SECURITIES>                                  0 
<RECEIVABLES>                             9,372 
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0 
<INVENTORY>                                   0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         57,763 
<PP&E>                                   10,330 
<DEPRECIATION>                            7,440 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          136,558 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    41,638 
<BONDS>                                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0 
<PREFERRED>                                   0 
<COMMON>                                    166 
<OTHER-SE>                               94,754 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            136,558 
<SALES>                                       0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         70,021 
<CGS>                                         0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            60,942 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           9,079 
<INCOME-TAX>                              3,589 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       5,490 
<DISCONTINUED>                                0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0 
<CHANGES>                                     0 
<NET-INCOME>                              5,490 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .33 
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .33 
        
                                    

</TABLE>