T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 08- 35738 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN THON Y TORRE Z, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. OR E GO N D E P AR T ME NT OF C O R R E C T I O N S , ap u b lic e n tity ; e t a l., D e f

e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s . N o. 08- 35738 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 6 8 9 - MO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon M i c ha e l W . M os m a n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A n th o n y T o rr ez , an O re g o n state p riso n er , ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s s um m a ryj udgm e ntf

orde f e nda nt s i n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng defe nd ant s w er e del i bera t el y i nd i ff er entt o h i s s er i ou s m edi ca l needs and re t al i at ed



# FI LED JU N 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 35738 2 a ga i ns thi m byde ny i ng hi m tr e a tm e ntf orhi s i ngui na l he rni a . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . T a ylo r v. L ist , 880 F . 2d 1040, 1044 (9th C i r. 19 89 ). W e r ever se i n p art , vaca t e i n p art , and rem and for further p ro ceed i n g s. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt g r a n te ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t o n T o rr e z ’s d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e c la im , b u t th e r e c o r ds h o w s th e e x is te n c e o f tr iab le is s u e s . S p e c if ic a lly , T o rr e z p r e s e n te dm e d ic a l r e c o r d s , le tte r s a n dg r ie v a n c e s te n d in g to show thatthe defendant s knew thathi s herni a, w hi ch had p re vi ou sl y r equi re d s ur ge ry , ha d r e c urr e d, be c om e e xtr e m e l ypa i nf ul , c ont i nue d t o w or s e n a nd w a s not ea si l y r educi bl e. T orre z a l so pres ent ed the decl ar at i on of D r. G re go ryst at i ng that the on l y tre atm entfor hi s c on di t i on w as surgery and , T orre z s ho w ed that d efen d an t s d en i ed h i m th i s treatm en t(o r an y o th er treatm en t ) fo r o v er fi v e m o n th s, f r o m th e e n do f

J u n e u n til m id - D e c e m b e r2 0 0 6 . Se e J ones v . J ohns on , 781 F . 2d 769, 771- 72 ( 9th C i r . 1986) ( r e c ogni z i ng tha tapa i nf ul he rni ac ons t i tut e s as e r i ous m e d ic a l n e e dr e q u ir in g tr e a tm e n t) ; s e e al s o Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 511 U . S . 825, 837 (199 4) (hol di ng thatpri son o ff i ci al i s del i bera t el y i nd i ff er enti f he knew that pri soner f

ac ed a s ub st ant i al ri sk of harm and d i sr egar ded thatri sk); Je t t v. P enner , 43 9 F . 3d 10 91 , 10 97 (9th C i r. 20 06 ) ( ho l di ng thattri abl e i ss ue exi st ed w here i nm at e a dv i se d p ri son d oct or of hi s nee d t o see ortho pedi stt o sethi s f ra ctured08- 35738 3 th u m b a n dd o c to rd idn o t r e s p o n d ) ; H un t v. D entalD ep’t , 8 6 5 F .2 d1 9 8 , 2 0 1 ( 9 th C i r. 19 89 ) ( concl ud i ng thata pri soner s t at ed a c l ai m for del i bera t e i nd i ff er ence w h e r e p r is o n e m p lo y e e ’s ap p r o x im a te lyth r e e - m o n th d e la yin r e s p o n d in g to g r ie v a n c e s c au s e dp r is o n e rto s u f f e ru n n e c e s s a rya n dw a n to n in f lic tio n o f p a in ) . T he r e f or e s um m a ryj udgm e nton T orr e z ’ s de l i be r a t e i ndi f f e r e nc e c l a i m i s r e ve r s e d. T h e d istrict co u rt g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t fo r d ef en d an ts o n T o rr ez ’s r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m , butT orr e z pr e s e nt e d e vi de nc e s how i ng age nui ne i s s ue of m at er i al fa ctas t o w hether defe nd ant s s ub j ec t ed hi m t o adv er se ac t i on — del ay ed m e di c a l tr e a tm e nt , di s m i s s a l of c om pl a i nt s of

pa i n, a nd de ni a l of

al ow e rbunk assi g n m en tt o al l ev i at e p ai n — b ecau se h e h adearl i er fi l eda § 1 9 8 3 act i o n ag ai n st th e m . See B ro dh ei m v. Cry , 58 4 F . 3d 12 62 , 12 70 -71 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). T here fore s um m a ryj udgm e nton T orr e z ’ s r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m i s r e ve r s e d. T h e d istrict co u rt g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t fo r d ef en d an ts o n T o rr ez ’s c l a i m unde rO r e gon l a w tha tthe de f e nda nt s br e a c he d the i rs e tt l e m e nta gr e e m e ntof T orr e z ’ s e a r l i e r§ 1983 a c t i on, w hi c h c a l l e d f or“ pr om pts ur gi c a l r e pa i rof [ T orr e z ’ s ] r i ghti ngui na l he rni a . ” B e c aus e the s pe c i f i e d pr ovi s i on i s s us c e pt i bl e of m o re th an o n e “ sen si b l e an dreaso n ab l e i n t erp ret at i o n , ” i ti s am b i g u o u s. D e e r fie ld C om m odi t i es , L td. v . N

e r c o, I nc ., 6 9 6 P .2 d1 0 9 6 , 1 1 0 4 - 0 5 ( O r . A p p . 1 9 8 5 ) . T he r e f or e , w e va c a t e s um m a ryj udgm e nton T orr e z ’ s br e a c h of c ontr a c tc l a i m f

or08- 35738 4 r e s o lu tio n o f

th is a m b ig u itya n df

u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith th is m e m or a ndum di s pos i t i on. W e a l s o va c a t e the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nton T orr e z ’ s c l a i m of i nt e nt i ona l i nf

l i c t i on of e m ot i ona l di s tr e s s a nd hi s c l a i m of br e a c h of

the c ove na nt o f g o o df a ith a n df

a ird e a lin g . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt s h o u ldc o n s id e rth e s e c la im s in l i ghtof thi s m e m or a ndum di s pos i t i on. C ost s on app ea l ar e aw ar ded t o T orre z. RE V E RS E D i n p a r t , V AC AT E D i n p a r t , a n d RE MAND E D.