alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 1, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (“CONFERS”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Allocation.Space, Orlando, FL and Virgin Orbit, Long Beach, CA have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CONFERS intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 10, 2018, CONFERS filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 19, 2018 (77 FR 36292).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 2, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 26, 2021 (86 FR 67494).                

Suzanne Morris, 

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-05182 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1056** 

DAVID CHAVEZ

- FLORES , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

**No. 16**  **- 1225** 

DAVID CHAVEZ

- FLORES , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition s for Review of Order s of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 29, 2016 Decided: October 14, 2016

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petitions dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General , Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, JoAnna L. Watson, Office of Immig ration Litigation , U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: David Chavez

- Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying relief from removal, and denying his motion to reconsider. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) (2012) , we lack jurisdiction to review the final order of r emoval of an alien convicted of certain enumerated crimes, including an aggravated felony or controlled substance offense. We retain jurisdiction only over constitutional claims or questions of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012); see Turkson v. Holder , 667 F.3d 523, 52 6

- 27 (4th Cir. 2012); Gomis v. Holder , 571 F.3d 353, 358 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[A]bsent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law, our review of the issue is not authorized by [8 U.S.C. §] 1252(a)(2)(D).”). This jurisidictional bar extends to our review of the denial of a motion to reconsider. Bracamontes v. Holder , 675 F.3d 380, 390 (4th Cir. 2012) (dismissing challenge to motion to reconsider for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)). Upon review, we find that the claims raised by Chavez

- Flores are not sufficiently colorable to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See, e.g. , Jian Pan v. Gonzales , 489 F.3d 80, 84 (1st Cir. 2007) (“To trigger our jurisdiction , the putative constitutional or legal challenge must be more than a4 disguised challenge to factual findings. The underlying constitutional or legal question must be colorable; that is, the argument advanced must, at the very least, have some potential validity.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions for rev iew for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DISMISSED
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1285 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1285

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2002 of 15 July 2002 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the Register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Kalakukko) **

*
Official Journal L 187 , 16/07/2002 P. 0021 - 0022 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1285/2002

of 15 July 2002

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the Register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Kalakukko)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 of 14 July 1992 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92, Finland has forwarded an application to the Commission for the name "Kalakukko" to be entered in the Register of certificates of specific character.

(2) The description "traditional speciality guaranteed" can only be used with names entered in that Register.

(3) No objection under Article 8 of that Regulation was sent to the Commission following the publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities(2) of the name set out in the Annex hereto.

(4) As a consequence, the name set out in the Annex should be entered in the Register of certificates of specific character and thereby protected as a traditional speciality guaranteed within the Community pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation No (EEC) 2082/92.

(5) The Annex hereto supplements the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2301/97(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 688/2002(4),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name in the Annex hereto is added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 and entered in the Register of certificates of specific character in accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

It shall be protected in accordance with Article 13(2) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 July 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 9.

(2) OJ C 235, 21.8.2001, p. 12.

(3) OJ L 319, 21.11.1997, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 106, 23.4.2002, p. 7.

ANNEX

Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares

- Kalakukko
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Trent B. Troyer
-------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 680 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 680

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 1995

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, 
and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with a 
coastwise endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR, United States official 
number 578550.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Robert Ashton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: June 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert Ashton                    
|                    |  |  |  | Robert Ashton                        
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andiza SIMMONS, a/k/a Horse, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4237

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 28, 2017

Decided: January 8, 2018

Emily Deck Harrill, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Beth Drake, United States Attorney, Nick Bianchi, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with a written plea agreement, Andiza Simmons pled guilty to possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). He was sentenced to 80 months in prison. Simmons now appeals, raising one issue. We affirm.

According to Simmons’ presentence investigation report, he previously had sustained at least two felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. The two offenses were South Carolina strong arm robbery and distribution of crack cocaine. In light of the prior convictions, Simmons’ base offense level was 24. *See*U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(2) (2014). Simmons contends on appeal that the strong arm robbery conviction was erroneously treated as a qualifying crime of violence under the Guideline,

Simmons’ claim is foreclosed by our decision in *United States v. Doctor,*842 F.3d 306 (4th Cir. 2016), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1831, 197 L.Ed.2d 773 (2017). In *Doctor,*we held that South Carolina strong arm robbery is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012) (ACCA). *Id.*at 312. Decisions evaluating whether an offense qualifies as a violent felony under the ACCA are dispositive of whether the offense also qualifies as a crime of violence under the Guidelines. *United States v. Montes-Flores,*736 F.3d 357, 363 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, *Doctor*controls in this case, and strong arm robbery was properly found to be a qualifying crime of violence under USSG § 2K2.1(a)(2).

We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *115the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Jose Omar ORTEGA-BALDERRAMA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-71999

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Nicholas W. Marehi, Carney & Marchi, PS, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner

Mary Jane Candaux, Assistant Director, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Omar Ortega-Balderrama, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact, and review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. *Padilla-Martinez v. Holder,*770 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Ortega-Balderrama’s challenge to the IJ’s denial of CAT relief because he failed to raise the issue before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency).

We reject, as unsupported by the record, Ortega-Balderrama’s contention that the BIA violated his due process rights by failing to review the IJ’s determination that his asylum application was time-barred. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a due process claim). Ortega-Balderrama does not otherwise challenge the agency’s time-bar finding. Thus, we deny the petition for review as to his asylum claim.

The agency found that the harm Ortega-Balderrama experienced from his father was due to his failure to comply with his father’s demands that he participate in illegal activities and not based on his membership in his family. The record does not compel a contrary conclusion. *See INS. v. Elia-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (“To reverse the BIA finding we must find that the evidence not only *supports*that conclusion, but *compels*it[.]”). Thus, we deny the petition as to Ortega-Balderrama’s withholding of removal claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan He and Xiuyong Zhang, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.



April 11, 2013



|/s/ Xiaoan He                  | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Xiaoan He                | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 



|/s/ Xiuyong Zhang              | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Xiuyong Zhang            | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 70 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 70

 To permit exports of certain domestically produced crude oil, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Dole (for Mr. Murkowski) (for himself, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Stevens, and 
  Mr. Heflin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit exports of certain domestically produced crude oil, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPORTS OF ALASKAN NORTH SLOPE OIL.

    Section 28 of the Act entitled ``An Act to promote the mining of 
coal, phosphate, oil, oil shale, gas, and sodium on the public 
domain'', approved February 25, 1920 (commonly known as the ``Mineral 
Leasing Act'') (30 U.S.C. 185), is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (s) and inserting the following:

                  ``exports of alaskan north slope oil

    ``(s)(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), notwithstanding any 
other provision of law (including any regulation), any oil transported 
by pipeline over a right-of-way granted pursuant to section 203 of the 
Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) may be 
exported.
    ``(2) Except in the case of oil exported to a country pursuant to a 
bilateral international oil supply agreement entered into by the United 
States with the country before June 25, 1979, or to a country pursuant 
to the International Emergency Oil Sharing Plan of the International 
Energy Agency, the oil shall be transported by a vessel documented 
under the laws of the United States and owned by a citizen of the 
United States (as determined in accordance with section 2 of the 
Shipping Act, 1916 (46 U.S.C. App. 802)).
    ``(3) Nothing in this subsection shall restrict the authority of 
the President under the Constitution, the International Emergency 
Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), or the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) to prohibit exportation of the 
oil.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (u).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by it shall take effect on the 
date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```