alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

                               NEON SYSTEMS, INC.

                         Compensation Committee Meeting

                                January 28, 2002

     A meeting of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of NEON
Systems, Inc. was held on January 28, 2002 following the monthly Meeting of the
Board of Directors. Present in person were Messrs. John Moores, Charlie Noell,
and Norris van den Berg. Present by telephone was Mr. George Ellis. Also present
was the General Counsel, Mr. Wayne E. Webb.

                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PACKAGE

As the first order of business, the Board considered the compensation package
for Louis R. Woodhill, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer. On
October 15, 2001, the Board of Directors appointed Louis R. Woodhill as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of NEON. Mr. Woodhill served as President
and Chief Executive Officer from October 15, 2001 to December 31, 2001 without a
compensation package. The Compensation Committee authorized a bonus of $135,000
based on Mr. Woodhill's achievement of a number of operational improvements
resulting in a refocusing of NEON's strategic direction in the quarter ended
December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, the Compensation Committee and the
full Board of Directors approved an executive compensation plan setting Mr.
Woodhill's annual compensation at a base salary of $450,000 and authorizing the
grant of an option to purchase 400,000 shares under the 1999 Long-Term Incentive
Plan with an exercise price equal to the closing price of NEON's common stock at
the close of business on January 28, 2002. The Compensation Committee has
determined that such compensation package is commensurate with its policies for
setting the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and is believed by the
Compensation Committee to be consistent with similar positions at similar
companies in the industry.
NUMBER 13-13-00021-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

ALONZO GONZALEZ, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 275th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the 

Honorable Rene Guerra, has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal pursuant to Rule 

42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). No 

decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we GRANT the motion and DISMISS 

the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing 
2

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

4th day of April, 2013.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11684]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7430]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso: Masterpieces From the Mus[eacute]e National 
Picasso, Paris''

    Summary: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Picasso: Masterpieces from the 
Mus[eacute]e National Picasso, Paris,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement 
with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Fine Arts Museums 
of San Francisco, de Young Museum, San Francisco, California, from on 
or about June 11, 2011, until on or about October 9, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.
    For Further Information Contact: For further information, including 
a list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 6, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-11684 Filed 5-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of PURE Bioscience (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | (i)        the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended October
31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |     |                                                  
|----------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Mark S. Elliott                              
|                        |     | Mark S. ElliottActing Principal Financial Officer

This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                   |

| Date:                November 3, 2005 | /s/                Patrick J. Goodman                            |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Patrick                J. Goodman                                |   |
|                                  | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                  | (chief                financial officer)                         |   |
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6163 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation 

Act of 1996 to repeal the denial of assistance and benefits for individuals 

with certain drug-related convictions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee 

on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to repeal the denial of assistance and benefits for individuals with certain drug-related convictions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Benefits Fair5 ness and Restoration Act of 2016’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6163 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DENIAL OF ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS 

2 FOR CERTAIN DRUG-RELATED CONVICTIONS. 

3 Section 115 of the Personal Responsibility and Work 

4 Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (21 U.S.C. 862a) 

5 is repealed. Any State law or regulation enacted under the 

6 authority of such section and in effect on the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act shall have no force or effect on or 

8 after such date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0111 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0111

**2002/111/EC: Commission Decision of 11 February 2002 amending Directive 92/33/EEC to extend the derogation relating to import conditions for vegetable propagating and planting material from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 427) **

*
Official Journal L 041 , 13/02/2002 P. 0043 - 0043 *

Commission Decision

of 11 February 2002

amending Directive 92/33/EEC to extend the derogation relating to import conditions for vegetable propagating and planting material from third countries

(notified under document number C(2002) 427)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/111/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/33/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of vegetable propagating and planting material other than seed(1), as last amended by Commission Decision 1999/29/EC(2), and in particular Article 16(2), second subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The Commission is required pursuant to Article 16(1) of Directive 92/33/EEC to decide whether vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed, produced in a third country and affording the same guarantees as regards obligations on the supplier, identity, characteristics, plant health, growing medium, packaging, inspection arrangements, marking and sealing, is equivalent in all these respects to vegetable propagating and planting material other than seed produced in the Community and complying with the requirements and conditions of that Directive.

(2) However, the information presently available on the conditions applying in third countries is still not sufficient to enable the Commission to adopt any such decision in respect of any third country at this stage.

(3) In order to prevent trade patterns from being disrupted, Member States importing vegetable propagating and planting material, other than seed, from third countries should be allowed to continue to apply to such products conditions equivalent to those applicable to similar Community products in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 92/33/EEC.

(4) The period of application of the derogation provided for to in Article 16(2), first subparagraph, of Directive 92/33/EEC, which was extended until 31 December 2001 by Decision 1999/29/EC, should accordingly be further extended.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Materials for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In the first subparagraph of Article 16(2) of Directive 92/33/EEC, the date "31 December 2001" is replaced by "31 December 2004".

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2002.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 157, 10.6.1992, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 8, 14.1.1999, p. 29.
Exhibit 10.17


Consent of Independent Public Accountants


As Independent Public Accountant, we hereby consent to the use in this
Registration Statement on Form 20F of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce of our report
dated January 18th 2000, except for the subject mentioned on the paragraph 3
that is dated on January 31st, 2002, relating to the financial statements of
Nova Era Silicon S.A. for the years ended December 31st, 1999 and 1998 which is
included in such Registration Statement.

Belo Horizonte, Brazil, June 27, 2002

/s/ Luiz Claudio Fontes

Luiz Claudio Fontes
Accountant
CRC 1RJ032470/O-9 "T" PR "S" MG
Trevisan Auditores
Independentes
CRC 2SP013439/O-5 "S" MG
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Geological Survey [GX22EF00COM0000]
 AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice; correction.
 SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) published a document in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on February 23, 2022, concerning conducting Tribal Consultation sessions to obtain oral and written comments on candidate replacement names for geographic feature names recently declared derogatory by DOI Secretary's Order 3404 (S.O. 3404). These sessions will be held virtually. The document contained an error when accessing the Zoom links.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Younkle, Special Assistant to the Assistant Secretary for Water and Science, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Water and Science, (202) 853-4345 or at 
                        *joseph_younkle@ios.doi.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction In 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of February 22, 2022, in FR Doc 87, 10232. Correct the hyperlinks for the table under the “Tribal Consultation sessions will be held virtually at the following date and location,” to read: Tribal Consultation sessions will be held virtually at the following date and location, and require pre-registration:
                    ( print page 15261) Date
Time
VenueMarch 21, 2022
12:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. Mountain Time
Zoom. To register please copy or type the following link into your internet browser: 
                            *tinyurl.com/28ebukm7*.March 22, 2022
11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Pacific Time
Zoom. To register please copy or type the following link into your internet browser: 
                            *tinyurl.com/czknm5b3*.March 23, 2022
1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Zoom. To register please copy or type the following link into your internet browser: 
                            *tinyurl.com/5a3ajejt*.
 You can also register from the Department of the Interior Upcoming Tribal Consultation page at 
                    *https://www.doi.gov/​priorities/​tribal-consultation/​upcoming-tribal-consultations*
                     or 
                    *https://go.usa.gov/​xzR7t.* Dated: March 14, 2022. Michael Tischler, Director, National Geospatial Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Chair, DOI Derogatory Geographic Names Task Force.


[FR Doc. 2022-05650 Filed 3-16-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4338-11-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Ryan NORTON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51016 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 4, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

*304Bobby Dale Barina, Harker Heights, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Ryan Norton pleaded guilty to conspiring with two other people to possess with intent to distribute about 18 pounds of methamphetamine. He was sentenced to 151 months in prison, a sentence at the bottom of the advisory guideline range based on that drug amount. He contends that the district court committed clear error by refusing his request for an offense level reduction based on being a minor or minimal participant in the offense under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.

The denial of a mitigating role adjustment is reviewed for clear error and “will not be deemed clearly erroneous if plausible in light of the record as a whole.” *United States v. Bello-Sanchez,*872 F.3d 260, 263 (5th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Norton has the burden of demonstrating entitlement to a mitigating role adjustment. *See United States v. Perez-Solis,*709 F.3d 453, 471 n.57 (5th Cir. 2013). No reduction is warranted unless Norton “was peripheral to the advancement of the criminal activity.” *Id.*at 471 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The decision whether to apply § 3B1.2 is “based on the totality of the circumstances and involves a determination that is heavily'dependent upon the facts of the particular case.” § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(C)).

The record includes testimony that one of the co-conspirators considered Norton her “partner” and that she and Norton were going to split the purchase of six pounds of methamphetamine with more bein£ provided on credit. Norton was carrying an amount of cash that substantially coincided with the cost of the three pounds that would be his share. Moreover, the court implicitly found that Norton’s contrary unsupported assertions were not credible in light of other evidence. *See State v. Kleinert,*855 F.3d 305, 318-19 (5th Cir. 2017) (noting that showing clear error is harder if the credibility of witnesses is a factor), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 23, 2017) (No. 17-299). Norton’s conduct was fully congruent with the charged offense and was not peripheral to it. *Cf. Perez-Solis,*709 F.3d at 471.

Norton fails to show that the district court committed clear error by finding that he was an average participant and by declining to award a mitigating role reduce tion. *See Bello-Sanchez,*872 F.3d at 263. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SEGRRIA LAMOSE BROOME,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50165

D.C. No. 5:06-cr-00109-RT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Robert J. Timlin, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Segrria Lamose Broome appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

JAN 05 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50165

Broome contends that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because,

among other things, the district court did not give sufficient weight to his mental

illness. The record reflects that the district court considered Broome’s arguments

and provided a reasoned basis for the sentence. In light of the totality of the

circumstances, the district court’s sentence within the Guidelines range is

substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id. 

Broome’s request to correct the caption to reflect that his first name is

spelled “Segrria” rather than “Seggria” is granted. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 35.1**[CHASE LOGO]****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**RE: Chase Mortgage Finance Trust (CMFT) 2006-S4: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement by and amongChase Mortgage Finance Co as Depositor, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, JPMorganChase Bank, NA as Custodian, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank,N.A. as Servicer, (the “Agreement”)The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, asservicer (the “Servicer”) pursuant to the Chase Mortgage Finance Trust (CMFT) 2006-S4 (The“Agreement”), does hereby certify that:          (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ending December 31,2006 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision;and          (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.Date: 02/28/2007         JPMorgan Chase Bank,National Association,