alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 927 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 927

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of a certain entry of 
           warp knitting machines as free of certain duties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 15 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of a certain entry of 
           warp knitting machines as free of certain duties.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATING ENTRY OF WARP KNITTING MACHINES.

    Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with the 
Customs Service before the 180th day after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall--
            (1) liquidate or reliquidate as duty free Entry No. 100-
        3022436-3, made on July 12, 1989, at the port of Charleston, 
        South Carolina; and
            (2) refund any duties and interest paid with respect to 
        such entry.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### State Justice Institute

# AGENCY:

State Justice Institute.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The SJI Board of Directors will be meeting on Monday, March 28, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. ET. The purpose of this meeting is to consider grant applications for the 2nd quarter of FY 2022, and other business.

# ADDRESSES:

The Nathan Deal Judicial Center, 330 Capitol Avenue SE, Atlanta, GA, 30334.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonathan Mattiello, Executive Director, State Justice Institute, 12700 Fair Lakes                               ( print page 13789)                            Circle, Suite 340, Fairfax, VA 22033, 703-660-4979,                         *contact@sji.gov.*

*Authority:*42 U.S.C. 10702(f).                    

Jonathan D. Mattiello,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-05086 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-SC-P
Trilliant Exploration Corporation
10-K




Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Trilliant Exploration Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I,
William Lieberman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:






(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and






(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 13th
      day of April , 2009./s/ William Lieberman
      /s/
              William
      Lieberman, Director and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 35.2

May 22, 2007

American Honda Finance Corporation20800 Madrona Ave.Torrance, California 90503

Attention: Michael J. Greene

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN, Inc. (triV1N) for services provided by its wholly owned subsidiary, FDI Computer Consulting, Inc., dba FDI Collateral Management (the Company), and American Honda Finance Corporation (AFHC).

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a)  | A review of the Company’s activities and performance under the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN and AFHC during the period commencing April 1, 2006 through and including March 31, 2007 has been conducted under my supervision, and; |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b)  | To the best of my knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN and AFHC in all material respects throughout the period commencing April 1, 2006 through and including March 31, 2007. |

Signed as of May 22, 2007.

FDI COMPUTER CONSULTING INC.,DBA FDI COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:  | /s/ Jeff Cooke                            Name: Jeff CookeTitle: Chief Executive Officer |

cc: Paul C. Honda, Assistant Vice President, American Honda Finance Corporation

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection
with the filing of Stewart & Stevenson LLC's (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer certifies that to my knowledge:



Date:
May 2, 2011

By:

/s/ JOHN B. SIMMONS John B. Simmons Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### Anthony J. CLAYTOR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, FCI HAZELTON-MED., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7106

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 22, 2017

Anthony J. Claytor, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony J. Claytor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Claytor v. Warden,*No. 3:17-cv-00085-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*158fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 15.1

The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial
information of PowerCerv Corporation for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2000, as indicated in our report dated October 20, 2000;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos.
333-3960, 333-50621 and 333-90827) pertaining to the PowerCerv Corporation 1995
Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-90825) pertaining to Stock Option
Agreements.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections
7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Tampa, Florida
October 20, 2000

23
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 995

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restrict payment of a clothing

allowance to incarcerated veterans and to create a presumption of permanent and total disability for pension purposes for certain veterans who

are patients in a nursing home.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. SIMPSON (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to restrict payment

of a clothing allowance to incarcerated veterans and to

create a presumption of permanent and total disability

for pension purposes for certain veterans who are patients in a nursing home.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Benefits Re5 form Act of 1995’’.
2

S 995 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FOR INCARCERATED VET2 ERANS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 38, United

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 5313

5 the following new section:

6 ‘‘§ 5313A. Limitation on payment of clothing allow7 ance to incarcerated veterans

8 ‘‘In the case of a veteran incarcerated in a Federal,

9 State, or local penal institution for a period in excess of

10 sixty days and furnished clothing without charge by the

11 institution, the amount of any clothing allowance payable

12 to such veteran under section 1162 of this title shall be

13 reduced on a pro rata basis for each day on which the

14 veteran was so incarcerated during the twelve-month pe15 riod preceding the date on which payment of the allowance

16 would be under regulations promulgated by the Sec17 retary.’’.

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

19 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting

20 after the item relating to section 5313 the following new

21 item:

‘‘5313A. Limitation on payment of clothing allowance to incarcerated veterans.’’
3

S 995 IS

1 SEC. 3. PRESUMPTION OF PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY

2 FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WHO ARE NURSING3 HOME PATIENTS.

4 Section 1502(a) of title 38, United States Code, is

5 amended by inserting ‘‘is 65 years of age or older and

6 a patient in a nursing home or, regardless of age,’’ after

7 ‘‘such a person’’.

Æ
# Official Journal C 495I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 495I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 649 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 495I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 649 December 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 495 I/01 | Commission Decision of 8 December 2021 on the open source licensing and reuse of Commission software | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 495 I/01

Commission Decision of 8 December 2021 on the open source licensing and reuse of Commission software

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             38
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                       32
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                              6
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  3,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                         2,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    3,843
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  346
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      78
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   14
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   14
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   100
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                63
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       63
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
#### Jerry Grant FRYE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16188

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*860Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed May 31, 2017

Jerry Grant Frye, Pro Se

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jerry Grant Frye appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising out of his criminal conviction. 'We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. *Hamilton v. Brown,*630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Frye’s action challenging his continuing confinement as barred under *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). *See id.*at 481-86, 114 S.Ct. 2364 (habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for a state prisoner who challenges the fact or duration of his confinement and seeks immediate or speedier release or damages arising from his allegedly unconstitutional conviction or confinement). Because the district court did not specify whether the dismissal of Frye’s action was with or without prejudice, we treat the dismissal as being without prejudice. *See Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa,*49 F.3d 583, 585 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissals under *Heck*are without prejudice).

The district court properly dismissed Frye’s original complaint because it failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), included claims that were ifec/c-barred, and failed to identify how defendants’ conduct caused Frye’s alleged constitutional injuries. *See McHenry v. Renne,*84 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir. 1996) (complaint must forth simple, concise and direct averments as required under Rule 8(a)(2)); *Heck,*512 U.S. at 481-86, 114 S.Ct. 2364; *Taylor v. List,*880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (liability under a § 1983 claim arises “only upon a showing of personal participation by the defendant”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Frye’s motions for appointment of counsel. *See Palmer v. Valdez,*560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and exceptional circumstances requirement for appointment of counsel).

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amendment No.2 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) by China Growth Corporation (the “Company”), I, Tin Nang (Chris) Lui, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








China Growth CorporationDate: July 12, 2011
By:
/s/ Tin Nang (Chris) LuiTin Nang (Chris) LuiChief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer











This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished upon request.
|                                            | Jurisdiction      | Direct      and Indirect |
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------------------------|
| Name      of Subsidiary                         | of      Formation | Effective      Ownership |
| Acadian      Gas, LLC                           | Delaware          | 66%                      |
| Acadian      Gas Pipeline System                | Texas             | 100%                     |
| Calcasieu      Gas Gathering System             | Texas             | 100%                     |
| Cypress      Gas Marketing, LLC                 | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| Cypress      Gas Pipeline, LLC                  | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| DEP      OLPGP, LLC                             | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| DEP      Operating Partnership, L.P.            | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| Enterprise      Holding III, L.L.C.             | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| Enterprise      GC, L.P.                        | Delaware          | 66%                      |
| Enterprise      Intrastate L.P.                 | Delaware          | 51%                      |
| Enterprise      Texas Pipeline LLC              | Texas             | 51%      (1)             |
| Enterprise      Lou-Tex Propylene Pipeline L.P. | Delaware          | 66%                      |
| Evangeline Gulf Coast      Gas, LLC   | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| MCN      Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC              | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| MCN      Pelican Interstate Gas, LLC            | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| Mont      Belvieu Caverns, LLC                  | Delaware          | 66%                      |
| Neches      Pipeline System                     | Texas             | 100%                     |
| Pontchartrain      Natural Gas System           | Texas             | 100%                     |
| Sabine      Propylene Pipeline L.P.             | Texas             | 66%                      |
| South      Texas NGL Pipeline LLC               | Delaware          | 66%                      |
| Tejas-Magnolia      Energy, LLC                 | Delaware          | 100%                     |
| TXO-Acadian      Gas Pipeline, LLC              | Delaware          | 100%                     |