# State E mergency

R e s pon s e C ommi ss ion A nnual R eport 2010

# State E mergency R e s pon s e C ommi ss ion for Hazardou s M aterial s 2010 commi ss ion member s
Thomas G. Pelham, AICP, Chair Department of Community Affairs David Halstead, Interim Alternate Chair Florida Division of Emergency Management Mr. Doug White Florida Department of Environmental Protec tion Mr. John Konke State Fire Marshal Mr. Brian Teeple Florida Regional Councils Association Chief Michael D. Murphy Florida Fire Chiefs Association Ms. Nancy Stephens Florida Minerals and Chemistry Council Mr. Taylor Abel Phosphate Industry Mr. Gary Weiss Environmental Special Agent Rick Ward Florida Department of Law Enforcement Mr. Ray Butts Utility Industry Mr. Richard R. Smith Florida Emergency Preparedness Association Mr. George H. Danz Local Emergency Planning Committees (Pending) Mr. Dan Starling Florida Department of Transportation Mr. David Mica Petroleum Industry Mr. David Rogers Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industry Ms. Allison Odyssey Space Florida Captain John Sherry Florida Professional Firefighters Mr. Michael J. Jacobs, III Florida Department of Health Mr. K. Mark Tumlin Agriculture Industry Mr. Art Johnstone Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer ServicesS tate E mergenc y R esponse C ommission for H a z ardous M aterials 2010 A nnual R eport Rick Scott Governor, State of Florida B r yan W. K oon Director, Division of Emergency Management Fo r in f o rm ation regarding the State Emergency Response C ommission for Hazardous Materials or the Hazardous Materials Planning and Prevention Program, contact: Florida Division of Emergency Management 2555 Shumard O ak Boulevard T allahassee, Florida 32399-2100 850-413-9970 or 800-635-7179 (toll free Florida only) Or vi s it ou r W eb Sit e at: www.floridadisaster.org ED ITO R: Donald K unish, Division of Emergency Management R ep o r t D es i g n Lida Maxwell, Division of Emergency Management Photographs used in this report are courtesy of the Local Emergency Planning C ommittees and Risk Management Planning Program faciliti es. Funding provided by: U .S. Department of T ransportation Hazardous Materials Emergency Prepardedness Grant 

# CONTENTS 3 2010 SER C A nnual Report EXE CUTIV E S U MM A R Y 5 N ortheast Florida Local Emergency Planning C ommittee

____ Biennal Exercise 9 Golf C ourses and Hazardous Material Reporting Requirements 13 T raining T ask Force – Focused on Preparedness 16 Emergency Response in the O il and N atural Gas I ndustry 19 A PPE N D I X F I G U RE 1: Section 304 I ncident I nvestigations by Y ear (2001 - 2010) F I G U RE 2: T otal Reported Hazardous Materials I ncidents by Local Emergency Planning C ommittee District for 2010 F I G U RE 3: T op T en Extremely Hazardous Substances and I nventory Levels F I G U RE 4: T op T en Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning C ommittee District F I G U RE 5: T otal Section 302 Facilities by Local Emergency Planning C ommittee District and C ounty F I G U RE 6: T oxic C hemical Release I nventory Facilities by Local Emergency Planning C ommittee District and C ounty F I G U RE 7: Risk Management Planning Facilities by Local Emergency Planning C ommittee District and C ounty 

### 32 Local Emergency Planning C ommittee C ontact I nformation

Released A pril 2011Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 4St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 3 

# 2010 SERC Annual Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

he State Emergency Response Commission’s 2010 Annual Re

port highlights the preparedness measures that hazardous material facilities, emergency planners and first responders utilize to protect Florida’s residents and guests. The Commission’s primary focus this year was to ensure Florida’s first responders were provided with adequate training on updated guidelines, procedures and curriculum. In support of this goal, the 11 Local Emergency Planning Commit

tees continued their dedicated mission by provid

ing training opportunities and conducting exer

cises in preparation for any potential real incidents The Northeast Florida Local Emergency Planning Committee Biennial Exercise provided an excellent example of these efforts. The Commission also continued to provide techni

cal assistance to hazardous material facilities on their individual reporting requirements. The Com

mission focused particularly in 2010 on providing training to golf course facilities across the state on their specific required reporting measures. The Commission’s Training Task Force also developed and updated multiple operating guides, responder courses and other operational readiness docu

ments. A complete summary of the current land

scape of hazardous materials in Florida is available in the 2010 Annual Report. 

# TAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 4St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 5 

# Northeast Florida Local Emergency Planning Committee Biennial Exercise

n March 4, 2010, the District Four Local Emergency Planning Com

mittee (LEPC) conducted its bien

nial full-scale exercise in the City of Green Cove Springs, Florida. The U.S. Department of Transportation provided funding for the exercise through the Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Program and the State of Florida provided funding through the Hazardous Materials Grant Program. The LEPC partnered with Clay County Fire Rescue and Re

sponse Technologies to create a realistic scenario which included a large cross section of nearly 60 Hazardous Materials Technicians from around the Region, including Clay County Fire Rescue, Jack

sonville Fire Rescue Department, and St. Johns County Fire Rescue. The exercise was designed to test a variety of techniques, including: rescue entry, decontamination, reconnaissance, substance identification and air monitoring. The participants were able to use assorted tools and equipment in order to fulfill the tasks presented to them. The purpose of the exercise was to examine how the firefighters’ prior training and education could be put to use within the context of a safe, learning en

vironment. An after action report was developed to identify the strengths of the HazMat teams, as well as to identify areas for improvement and to assess training and equipment needs. In addition, a Type III Incident Management Team (IMT) was brought in for training to coordinate all the simulated response efforts of the three county HazMat teams, as well as manage the staging of on-site resources, coordinate the request and ac

quisition of simulated resources, and serve as the main planning and communications hub for the entire incident. The exercise was regional in scope with participants from around the LEPC District 

# O By Jason Taylor, Northeast Florida Regional CouncilAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 6St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 7 in attendance. This exercise reflected what a po

tential incident that requires a multi-jurisdictional, or cooperative response, would entail. Several LEPC members, volunteers, and staff were involved throughout the planning, development and execu

tion stages of the exercise. The Incident Manage

ment Team was also glad to have played a part in the coordination needs of the exercise. At the end of the day, the exercise was deemed a success by all the participants because it gave them a chance to work together with their colleagues and coun

terparts from within the District.Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 8St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 9 he Emergency Planning and Com

munity Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) was designed to promote emer

gency planning and preparedness at both the state and local level. It provides citizens, local governments, and local response authorities with information regarding the potential hazards in their community. EPCRA requires any facility that is using or storing specific chemicals to inform state and local agencies that it is subject to EPCRA requirements. With more than 1,200 active golf courses, Florida is the golf capital of the United States. To ensure that the public and first responders have the best 

# Golf Courses and Hazardous Material Reporting Requirements

data available to make informed protective action decisions, the State Emergency Response Commis

sion is actively providing compliance assistance to golf courses. The requirements for golf courses are very technical and specific guidance is often necessary. As an example, the United States Envi

ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that golf course operations do not qualify for the agri

cultural exemption found at Section 311(e)(5) of EPCRA. This exemption excludes fertilizers held for sale by retailers and any substance which is used in routine agricultural operations. Since golf courses derive most of their income from the playing of golf, not the sale of turf or other horticultural prod

ucts, all of the hazardous chemicals (e.g., pesti



# T By Sam Brackett, Florida Division of Emergency ManagementAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 10 cides, and fuel for equipment) handled by the golf course must be reported under Section 311/312 if applicable thresholds are exceeded. For EPCRA consideration, one of the most over

looked substances at golf course operations is sulfuric acid in golf cart batteries. The sulfuric acid and lead that comprise these batteries must be included when determining the various thresholds for the EPCRA section regulations. The typical golf course operation will have a fleet of electric golf carts numbering between 50 and 100. Each elec

tric golf cart is powered by several lead acid bat

teries (six being most common). The batteries are found under the golf cart seat and are connected together by battery cable. The batteries usually weigh between 60 and 90 pounds, depending on the brand. The golf carts are used on the course daily and the batteries are charged nightly in a cart barn or other large interior space usually in the clubhouse building.St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 11 Currently the Commission requires golf courses to report under EPCRA Sections 302 and 312 for sulfuric acid in golf cart batteries. The reporting thresholds are 1,000 pounds onsite at any time for Section 302 and 500 pounds for Section 312. Note that there are no exemptions for EPCRA Section 302. However, the Commission does not require the reporting of batteries in fleet vehicles parked outside on a property since that information would be of little value to first responders. To add to the complexity of reporting, EPA specifi

cally states that automotive batteries and other “non-industrial batteries” are exempt from EPCRA Section 312 (Tier Two chemical Inventory report

ing) per Section 311(e)(3) which exempts “any sub

stance to the extent it is used for personal, family, or household purposes, or is present in the same form and concentration as a product packaged for distribution and use for the general public.” An industrial battery is defined as, “any battery or battery pack which is designed exclusively for industrial or professional uses; used as a source of power for propulsion in an electric vehicle; un

sealed but is not an automobile battery; or sealed but is not a portable battery.” The Commission believes that golf cart batter

ies, as configured on the golf carts, more closely resemble industrial batteries (such as fork lift bat

teries) in form (as configured on the golf carts) and function (traction batteries that are deeply discharged and charged repeatedly), than they do automotive batteries (non-industrial batteries). Also, they closely match the previous definition of an industrial battery. With regards to portability, there is no question that automotive batteries are portable (at 35 pounds on average). However, at weights between 60 and 90 pounds golf cart bat

teries would not be considered to be portable. Even if one assumes that golf cart batteries are “non-industrial” batteries and therefore potentially meet the exemption requirement per Section 311(e)(3), the United States EPA has required the reporting of hazardous substances if they pose much greater hazards when present onsite in significantly larger quantities (see www.epa.gov/ osweroe1/content/epcra/epcra-qa_exempt_311. ht m ). With these points in consideration, the Commis

sion’s position in this matter is that the quantities of lead acid batteries found at many golf course operations (10 tons or more in an interior space) do meet that greater hazards criterion for emer

gency responders and, if a golf course exceeds the EPCRA thresholds for sulfuric acid, they must file for both Sections 302 and 312. These reports are available to the public and are used by first re

sponders in emergency planning and responses. The Commission will continue its compliance as

sistance work with Florida’s golf courses to ensure the highest level of emergency preparedness is achieved to help protect Florida’s residents and visitors.Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 12St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 13 In January 1993, the State Emer

gency Response Commission established the Training Task Force to address the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Trans

portation Act grant program. Members include representation from the fire service, emergency medical services, law enforcement, public health, emergency management, environmental response and private industry. Since its inception, the Task Force’s responsibilities have been expanded to include the development of responder training guidelines, coordination with responders to ensure required hazardous materials training is available, establishment of a uniform classification system for 

# Training Task Force – Focused on Preparedness

hazardous materials incidents, and the assessment of response capabilities of regional hazardous ma

terials response teams. This year, the Task Force included the U.S. Fire Administration and other federal agencies in its discussions so that Florida continues to be at the forefront ensuring responders have the skills and capabilities to provide for its citizens. Major projects the Training Task Force has com

pleted include: Capabilities Assessment Tools for Type II and  Type III Hazardous Materials Response Teams 

# J measuring standards set by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). Hazmat Technician Refresher Certification  Check-off, providing a standard method for ensuring competency is met in accordance with NFPA standards for hazmat technicians. Medical Surveillance policies for hazardous  materials responders providing guidance to ensure responders meet specific criteria prior to, and after entry into a hazardous materials environment. Hazardous Materials Field Operations Guide,  a (hip-pocket) guide for the Hazmat respond By Lou Ritter, Florida Division of Emergency Management and Don Sessions, Gainesville Fire RescueAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 14 er that provides quick guidance for response to various hazardous materials emergencies. Medical Response Protocol for Hazardous  Materials Emergencies, comprising a comprehensive list of toxidromes and treatment modalities for most medical emergencies found in a hazardous materials event.Operations-level Hazardous Materials Train ing Guidelines, which outlines job performance training for non-hazmat fire service and law enforcement members in response to a hazardous materials emergencies.Hazmat Protocols for the acquisition of sus picious substances for analysis through the State Laboratory Network as well as guide lines for conducting presumptive testing to provide preliminary real-time information to Incident Commanders. Pro Board Certification, allowing hazardous  materials responders a national registry capability that facilitates a team its ability to respond to another jurisdiction or to an other state when requested. Within the past year, the Training Task Force and its partner agencies developed a list of subject mat

ter experts within the public sector, emergency response teams to enhance productivity regarding target initiatives. The Training Task Force is cur

rently addressing the standardization of hazardous materials event reporting, long-term cost and sus

tainment issues for Florida’s 32 hazardous materials teams, the new U.S. Coast Guard requirements for shipboard firefighting, and development of recom

mendations for curriculum elements regarding emergency medical services response to hazard

ous materials incidents. The group remains committed to enhancing the educational, operational, and procedural ap

proaches associated with emergency response to potential releases of hazardous materials within the State of Florida.St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 15Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 16 The oil and natural gas industry has a strong safety record de

spite a work environment that often involves heavy equipment, hazardous materials, high tem

peratures and high pressures. The oil and natural gas industry’s strategy of mitigating inherent risks to prevent hazardous situations was success

ful during 60 years of safely drilling over 42,000 offshore wells in the Gulf. The unprecedented response to last year’s Gulf accident further il

lustrates the industry’s efforts to raise the bar on safety standards. 

# Emergency Response in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

The public learned about the industry’s immedi

ate response to the Gulf incident as it unfolded on newscasts and the internet over the summer. However, the industry was also concurrently work

ing behind the scenes evaluating information related to the causes of the incident and the re

sponse to the incident and developing a strategy for the future. The results are tangible and include the immediate release of more stringent standards, the creation of an enhanced spill response compa

ny, and the establishment of a new safety institute to continually evaluate new technology and proce

dures to recommend best management practices to the industry. 

# T By David Mica, Florida Petroleum Council
Immediately following the Gulf incident, the oil and natural gas industry convened a number of task forces to focus on improvements to equip

ment, operations, subsea well control and spill containment. Their recommendations were codi

fied in standards and used by the U.S. Department of Interior as the core of regulatory amendments adopted in the fall – mere months following the incident. The industry is now operating under these more stringent standards. The Gulf accident in 10,000 feet of water pre

sented challenges never before encountered. New equipment and procedures were developedSt a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 17 to contain the well and mitigate the impact of oil in the environment. Recognizing the value of the successes gained, four companies, ExxonMo

bil, ConocoPhillips, Shell, and Chevron, initially contributed $1 billion and valuable engineering expertise to create the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC) to design, develop and imple

ment state-of-the-art containment systems that go beyond lessons learned to rapidly respond to any spill in the future. The MWCC announced it has successfully completed testing of its system’s capability in 8,000 feet of water and capturing 60,000 barrels a day. Amazingly, the MWCC is ready to respond to incidents with all the necessary equipment to contain and cap any well within the Gulf of Mexico. Three other companies have since joined the initial venture to ensure future success. The industry did not stop there. It is taking a lon

ger view of addressing future opportunities and challenges. Our parent organization, The American Petroleum Institute announced the creation of the Center for Offshore Safety, which will promote the highest level of safety for offshore operations, through an effective program that addresses man

agement practices, communication and teamwork. In designing the institute, the API reviewed five other safety programs, including the U.K.’s Step Change in Safety, the chemical industry’s Responsi

ble Care® program, the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations, the OSHA Voluntary Protection Pro

gram, and the Safety Case Regime for international operators. The Center for Offshore Safety will draw on the lessons learned from successful, exist

ing safety programs, applying the best elements of these programs to accommodate the unique chal

lenges of offshore oil and natural gas operations, and will rely on independent auditing and review by third-party certifiers, according to API. The oil and natural gas industry’s rapid response to this unprecedented incident is a model for emer

gency response organizations. While respond

ing to the emergency, the industry concurrently learned and improved its response capabilities for the future.Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 18St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 19 

# A PPENDI X The following charts and maps reflect hazardous chemical amounts in Local Emergency Planning Committee Districts and the number of facilities storing these chemicals throughout the state. A map outlining these districts along with each Local Emergency Planning Committee chairperson and staff contact information can be found on page 32. FIGU R E 1: Section 304 Incident Investigations by Year (2001 - 2010)



### _______________________________________ 20 FIGU R E 2: Total Reported Hazardous Materials Incidents by Local Emergency Planning Committee District for 2010



### _____________________________________________________________________________ 21 FIGURE 3: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances and Inventory Levels



### __________________________________ 22 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District



### ___________ 22 FIGU R E 5: Total Section 302 Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and County



### ______________ 28 FIGU R E 6: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and County 

### 29 FIGU R E 7: Risk Management Planning Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and County



### ______ 31 Local Emergency Planning Committee Contact Information



### ______________________________________________ 32



## 19Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 20 FIGU R E 1: Section 304 Incident Investigations by Year (2001 - 2010)

Note: The increase in investigations is indicative of increased education and facility compliance with accidental release reporting requirements and not an increase in hazardous materials accidents. 

# 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

### 93 176 192 265 252
199 162 141 325

128St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 21 FIGU R E 2: Total Reported Hazardous Materials Incidents by Local Emergency Planning Committee District for 2010.



# 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2010 Total Incidents = 1,576

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11

92 71 49 75 74 125 162 213 193 257 265Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 22 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District FIGURE 3: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances and Inventory Levels

Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes

Washington 

# 1 Chemical Inventory Level (lbs) Sulfuric acid 417,521,326 Ammonia 330,958,489 Nitric acid 32,027,195 Adiponitrile 26,220,000 Chlorine 26,192,914 Methyl bromide 5,382,109 Aldicarb 4,530,682 Formaldehyde 2,945,334 Phenol 2,909,196 Sulfur dioxide 2,551,519 STATEWIDE TOTALS

Indian River St. Lucie Martin
Palm Beach 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 11 Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades Hendry 9 Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 8 Polk

Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 7 Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 6 Levy

Citrus

Hernando MarionSumter

5 Nassau

St. Johns Flagler Baker Clay Putnam 4

Duval Taylor

Dixie Madison
Lafayette Suwannee Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 3 Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 2 Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes Washington 1

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) Nitric acid 30,060,533 Adiponitrile 26,220,000 Ammonia 21,616,634 Sulfuric acid 10,512,076 Phenol 2,896,779 Formaldehyde 2,750,000 Chlorine 427,629 Hydrogen chloride 160,945 Vinyl acetate 100,600 Sulfur dioxide 41,140 DISTRICT 1St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 23 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District (continued)

Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 

# 2

Taylor

Dixie Madison
Lafayette Suwannee

Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 

# 3 Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 2

Sulfuric acid 2,828,309 Chlorine 196,090 Ammonia 195,437 Nitric acid 154,638 Phorate 33,120 Sulfur Trioxide 26,396 Hydrogen Fluoride 20,000 Aldicarb 15,430 Sulfur dioxide 14,800 Formaldehyde 13,500

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 3

Sulfuric acid 119,708,626 Ammonia 5,831,806 Chlorine 876,117 Sulfur dioxide 202,802 Chlorotrimethylsilane 191,900 Ethoprop 189,660 Aldicarb 154,875 Methyl bromide 86,878 Terbufos 78,580 Hydrogen sulfide 55,397Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 24 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District (continued) 

### Nassau

St. Johns Flagler Baker Clay Putnam 

# 4 Duval

Levy

Citrus Hernando MarionSumter 

# 5 Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 4

Sulfuric acid 37,699,453 Chlorine 3,432,087 Ammonia 2,494,132 Sulfur dioxide 1,132,850 Nitric acid 305,006 Hydrofluoric acid 141,530 Aldicarb 125,754 Cyclohexlamine 60,023 Ethion 55,676 Hydrogen Fluoride 42,785

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 5

Sulfuric acid 683,848 Ammonia 149,827 Chlorine 71,951 Nitric acid 49,598 Nitrogen oxide 47,352 Hydrogen fluoride 40,320 Hydrazine 12,973 Ethoprop 9,600 Methyl bromide 8,100 Cyclohexlamine 3,752St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 25 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District (continued)

Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 

# 6

Polk
Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 

# 7 Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 6

Sulfuric acid 5,827,496 Chlorine 2,827,773 Ammonia 1,919,052 Nitric acid 411,752 Aldicarb 381,005 Methyl hydrazine 132,579 Sulfur dioxide 125,851 Paraquat dichloride 97,607 Methomyl 66,556 Oxamyl 52,399

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 7

Sulfuric acid 69,036,240 Ammonia 5,433,707 Aldicarb 1,858,046 Chlorine 712,620 Methyl bromide 258,286 Hydrogen fluoride 228,192 Methamidophos 201,219 Formaldehyde 194,068 Paraquat dichloride 144,073 Acrylonitrile 126,976Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 26 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District (continued)


### Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 

# 8

Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades Hendry 

# 9 Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 8

Ammonia 291,434,572 Sulfuric acid 160,369,873 Chlorine 7,577,448 Vanadium pentoxide 1,547,216 Methyl bromide 4,067,231 Nitric acid 780,645 Sulfur dioxide 457,326 Aldicarb 353,024 Peracetic acid 205,941 Vinyl acetate 171,650

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 9

Sulfuric acid 4,642,517 Aldicarb 913,842 Methyl bromide 460,580 Ammonia 403,145 Chlorine 346,470 Endosulfan 70,254 Nitric acid 65,667 Peracetic acid 50,449 Paraquat dichloride 46,387 Oxamyl 41,948St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 27 FIGU R E 4: Top Ten Extremely Hazardous Substances by Local Emergency Planning Committee District (continued) Indian River St. Lucie

Martin
Palm Beach



# 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 

# 11 Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 10

Sulfuric acid 6,468,554 Chlorine 1,659,950 Phorate 1,326,875 Aldicarb 713,311 Ammonia 695,835 Sulfur dioxide 514,000 Methyl bromide 502,794 Zinc phosphide 230,550 Paraquat dichloride 112,539 Methomyl 110,868

Chemical Maximum Inventory (lbs) DISTRICT 11

Chlorine 8,078,829 Sulfuric acid 7,164,226 Ammonia 790,742 Methyl bromide 90,345 Methomyl 84,050 Nitric acid 53,131 Endosulfan 43,766 Hydrogen fluoride 36,267 Dimethoate 35,763 Oxamyl 35,658Annu a l Repo r t 2010



## 28 FIGU R E 5: Total Section 302 – Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and County



## 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11 367

220
142 313

117 264 544

237 318 473 547 Indian River

St. Lucie

Martin
Palm Beach 

## 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 

## 11 Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades

Hendry 

## 9 Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 

## 8 Polk
Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 

## 7 Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 

## 6 Levy

Citrus Hernando MarionSumter 

## 5 Nassau

St. Johns

Flagler Baker Clay Putnam Duval 

## 4 Taylor

Dixie

Madison
Lafayette Suwannee

Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 

## 3 Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 

## 2 Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes

Washington 

## 1 Number of Facilities by County 1 - 49 50 - 99 200 -299 100 - 199St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 29 0 50 100 150 200

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11 34 17 27 84

23 54 135

24 34 80 106 Indian River

St. Lucie

Martin
Palm Beach 

## 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 

## 11 Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades

Hendry 

## 9 Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 

## 8 Polk
Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 

## 7 Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 

## 6 Levy

Citrus Hernando MarionSumter 

## 5 Nassau

St. Johns

Flagler Baker Clay Putnam Duval 

## 4 Taylor

Dixie

Madison
Lafayette Suwannee

Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 

## 3
Alachua Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 

## 2 Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes

Washington 

## 1

1 - 9 10 - 24 50 + 25 - 49 Number of Facilities by County 

### FIGU R E 6: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and CountyAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 30St a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 31 Indian River

St. Lucie

Martin
Palm Beach



## 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 

## 11 Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades

Hendry 

## 9 Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 

## 8 Polk
Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 

## 7 Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 

## 6 Levy

Citrus Hernando MarionSumter 

## 5 Nassau

St. Johns

Flagler Baker Clay Putnam Duval 

## 4 Taylor

Dixie

Madison
Lafayette Suwannee

Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 

## 3 Lafayette Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 

## 2 Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes

Washington 

## 1

0 25 50 75

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 District 7 District 8 District 9 District 10 District 11 18
7 15 48

4 37 43

16 25 32 50 

### FIGU R E 7: Risk Management Planning Facilities by Local Emergency Planning Committee District and County

0 1 - 5 16 -25 6 - 15 26+ Number of Facilities by CountyAnnu a l Repo r t 2010



## 32 Indian River

St. Lucie

Martin
Palm Beach



# 10

Broward

Monroe Monroe County Miami-Dade 

# 11 Sarasota Charlotte Lee
Collier Glades

Hendry 

# 9 Pasco

Manatee Pinellas Hillsborough 

# 8 Polk
Hardee DeSoto Highlands Okeechobee 

# 7 Volusia

Brevard Lake Seminole Orange
Osceola 

# 6 Levy

Citrus Hernando MarionSumter 

# 5 Nassau

St. Johns

Flagler Baker Clay Putnam 

# 4 Duval Taylor

Dixie

Madison
Lafayette Suwannee

Hamilton

Union Bradford Alachua Columbia

Gilchrist 

# 3 Gulf Franklin Wakulla Jefferson Jackson
Calhoun Liberty Gadsden Leon 

# 2 Escambia Santa Rosa Okaloosa Walton Bay Holmes

Washington 

# 1 

# L ocal E mergency P lanning C ommittee s District 1 WEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Richard Delp / Staff Contact: Kathy Ahlen 4081 East Olive Road, Suite A • Pensacola 32514 (850) 332-7976 ext. 210 (800) 226-8914 FAX: (850) 637-1923 e-mail address: kathy.ahlen@wfrpc.org 2 APALACHEE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Richard Smith / Staff Contact: Chris Rietow 20776 Central Avenue East, Suite 1 • Blountstown 32424 (850) 674-4571 FAX: (850) 674-4574 Tallahassee Office (850) 488-6211 ext. 102 FAX: (850) 488-1616 e-mail address: chris.rietow@thearpc.com 3 NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Ron Mills / Staff Contact: Dwayne Mundy 2009 N.W. 67 Place, Suite A • Gainesville 32653-1603 (352) 955-2200 ext. 108 FAX: (352) 955-2209 e-mail address: mundy@ncfrpc.org 4 NORTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Ray Ashton / Staff Contact: Jason Taylor 6850 Belfort Oaks Place • Jacksonville 32216 (904) 279-0885 ext. 136 FAX: (904) 279-0881 e-mail address: jtaylor@nefrc.org 5 WITHLACOOCHEE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Deputy Chief David Cooper / Staff Contact: Michael Arnold 1241 S.W. 10th Street • Ocala 34471-0323 (352) 732-1315 ext. 228 FAX: (352) 732-1319 e-mail address: marnold@wrpc.cc 6 EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Jennifer Hobbs / Staff Contact: April Raulerson 309 Cranes Roost Boulevard, Suite 2000 • Altamonte Springs 32701 (407) 262-7772 FAX: (407) 262-7788 e-mail address: araulerson@ecfrpc.org 7 CENTRAL FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Gary Weiss / Staff Contact: Chuck Carter 555 East Church Street • Bartow 33830 (863) 534-7130 ext. 107 FAX: (863) 534-7138 e-mail address: ccarter@cfrpc.org 8 TAMPA BAY REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Chief Scott Ehlers / Staff Contact: John Meyer 4000 Gateway Centre Blvd., Suite 100 • Pinellas Park 33782-3616 (727) 570-5151 ext. 29 FAX: (727) 570-5118 e-mail address: johnm@tbrpc.org 9 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Bruce Porter / Staff Contact: John Gibbons 1926 Victoria Avenue • Ft. Myers 33901 (239) 338-2550 ext. 229 FAX: (239) 338-2560 e-mail address: jgibbons@swfrpc.org 10 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: Chris Bushman / Staff Contact: Kate Boer 421 SW Camden Avenue • Stuart 34994 (772) 221-4060 ext. 24 FAX: (772) 221-4067 e-mail address: kboer@tcrpc.org 11 SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL LEPC Chairperson: George Danz / Staff Contact: Manny Cela 3440 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 140 • Hollywood 33021 (954) 985-4416 FAX: (954) 985-4417 e-mail address: celam@sfrpc.comSt a te E me r gency Re s pon s e C ommi ss ion fo r H a z ar dou s Ma te r i a l s



## 33

## S t a te Em e r g enc y Res p onse C o mmi ss i on f o r Hazard o u s M a te rial s A nnua l R ep o r t 2010