alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0073 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0073

**2003/73/EC: Commission Decision of 30 January 2003 amending Decision 97/468/EC as regards the inclusion of Estonia and Namibia establishments in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of wild game meat (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 333) **

*
Official Journal L 027 , 01/02/2003 P. 0031 - 0032 *

Commission Decision

of 30 January 2003

amending Decision 97/468/EC as regards the inclusion of Estonia and Namibia establishments in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of wild game meat

(notified under document number C(2003) 333)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/73/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Decision 2001/4/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(1) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Provisional lists of establishments in third countries producing wild game meat have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/468/EC(3) as last amended by Decision 2002/672/EC(4).

(2) Estonia and Namibia have sent lists of establishments producing wild game meat for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishments complies with the Community rules.

(3) As on the spot inspections have not yet been carried out, imports from such establishments are not eligible for reduced physical checks in accordance with Article 2(4) of Decision 95/408/EC.

(4) Decision 97/468/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 97/468/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 4 February 2003.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 January 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 2, 5.1.2001, p. 21.

(3) OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 62.

(4) OJ L 228, 24.8.2002, p. 26.

ANNEX

The following text is inserted in the Annex in accordance with the alphabetical order of the ISO code:

"País: Estonia/Land: Estland/Land: Estland/Χώρα: Εσθονία/Country: Estonia/Pays: Estonie/Paese: Estonia/Land: Estland/País: Estónia/Maa: Viro/Land: Estland

País: Namibia/Land: Namibia/Land: Namibia/Χώρα: Ναμίμπια/Country: Namibia/Pays: Namibie/Paese: Namibia/Land: Namibië/País: Namíbia/Maa: Namibia/Land: Namibia"

(1) Large wild game.

(2) Excluding meat of wild swine.

(3) Deboned wild game meat only - offals excluded.

(4) Large wild game (Springbok (Antidorcas marsupialis))

(5) Excluding meat of wild swine.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6261 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve the way beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare shared savings program by 

also basing such assignment on primary care services furnished by nurse 

practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. KILMER (for himself and Ms. JENKINS of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve 

the way beneficiaries are assigned under the Medicare 

shared savings program by also basing such assignment 

on primary care services furnished by nurse practitioners, 

physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ACO Assignment Im5 provement Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6261 IH

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF BENE2 FICIARIES UNDER THE MEDICARE SHARED 

3 SAVINGS PROGRAM. 

4 Section 1899(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395jjj(c)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘utilization of primary’’ and in7 serting ‘‘utilization of— 

8 ‘‘(1) in the case of performance years beginning 

9 on or after April 1, 2012, primary’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (1), as added by paragraph 

11 (1) of this section, by striking the period at the end 

12 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(2) in the case of performance years beginning 

16 on or after January 1, 2018, primary care services 

17 provided under this title by an ACO professional de18 scribed in subsection (h)(1)(B).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0278 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0278

**2002/278/EC: Commission Decision of 10 April 2002 amending Decision 2001/393/EC as regards the certification for the import of specified pathogen-free eggs from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 1374) **

*
Official Journal L 099 , 16/04/2002 P. 0014 - 0016 *

Commission Decision

of 10 April 2002

amending Decision 2001/393/EC as regards the certification for the import of specified pathogen-free eggs from third countries

(notified under document number C(2002) 1374)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/278/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs(1), as last amended by Commission Decision 2001/867/EC(2), and in particular Article 23(2), Article 24(2) and Article 27a thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 2001/393/EC(3) lays down animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the import of specified pathogen-free eggs from third countries and draws up a list of third countries from which Member States authorise imports of such eggs.

(2) The validity period of the animal health certificate has been fixed at five days.

(3) Transport and logistical difficulties have caused problems in delivering pathogen-free eggs to Member States prior to the date of expiry of the validity of the animal health certificate.

(4) There is a low risk of contamination of this product during transport when packaged and transported in accordance with the requirements of Decision 2001/393/EC. An extension of the validity period of the certificate to 15 days would not jeopardise the health status of such a product.

(5) Decision 2001/393/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex II to Decision 2001/393/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2002.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 303, 31.10.1990, p. 6.

(2) OJ L 323, 7.12.2001, p. 29.

(3) OJ L 138, 22.5.2001, p. 31.

ANNEX

"ANNEX II

>PIC FILE= "L_2002099EN.001503.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2002099EN.001601.TIF">"
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5970 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5970

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit sentencing judges in 
child sex trafficking cases to order the Attorney General to publicize 
  the name and photograph of the convicted defendants, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2016

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to permit sentencing judges in 
child sex trafficking cases to order the Attorney General to publicize 
  the name and photograph of the convicted defendants, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shame Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PERSONS CONVICTED IN 
              CONNECTION WITH CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING.

    Section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) The court may order the Attorney General to publish publicly 
the name and photograph of any person convicted under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel T. McCoy, Chief Executive Officer of Keegan Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Annual Report on Form 20-F, of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | By:    | /s/  Daniel T. McCoy 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Daniel T. McCoy        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | June 29, 2009          

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 27, 2015

NO. 03-14-00577-CR

Nicole Dawn Holland, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment revoking community supervision signed by the district

court. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the district court’s judgment revoking community supervision. Therefore, the 

Court affirms the district court’s judgment revoking community supervision. Because appellant 

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SE GRRI A LAM OSE B ROOM E, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50165 D . C. N o . 5 : 0 6 - c r - 0 0 1 0 9 - RT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R obe rtJ . T i m l i n, S e ni orD i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S e grr i aL a m os e B r oom e appe a l s f r om the 24- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a n dw e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED JAN 05 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50165 2 B room e c on t ends thatthe se nt ence w as subst ant i vel y unrea sonabl e bec ause , am on g o ther thi ng s, the di stri ctcourtdi d n otgi ve suff i ci entw ei gh tt o h i s m ent al illn e s s . T h e r e c o r dr e f

le c ts th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt c o n s id e r e dB r o o m e ’s a r g u m e n ts a nd pr ovi de d ar e a s one d ba s i s f orthe s e nt e nc e . I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c ir c u m s ta n c e s , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s e n te n c e w ith in th e G u id e lin e s r a n g e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . M o r e o v e r , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t p r o c e du r a llye rr . Se e id . B r o o m e ’s r e q u e s t to c o rr e c t th e c ap tio n to r e f le c t th a t h is f

ir s t n a m e is s p e lle d“S e g rr ia ” r a th e rth a n “S e g g r ia ” is g r a n te d . AF F I RME D.
#### In the Matter of the Application to Widen Washington Street in the City of Poughkeepsie.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May 11, 1891.)*

1. Municipal corporations—Opening streets—Laws 1883, chap. 523.

The word “ section ” in the charter of Poughkeepsie is qualified by the words “ proposed to be improved,” so that a petition by a majority of the owners of the frontage proposed to be improved is a sufficient compliance with the charter to confer jurisdiction.

2. Same—Waiver of objections.

Objections to the form of the petition are waived by appearance before the commissioners and a trial of the case on the merits.

Appeal by a property owner from an award made to him for land taken to widen the street and the assessment made upon his remaining land for benefits.

*Horace D. Hufcut,*for app’lt; *C. B.*Herrick, for resp’t

Pratt, J.

This appeal is taken by the owner of a portion óf the property taken to widen a street from the award made to him for the land taken and from the assessment made upon his remaining land for the benefits arising from such widening and improvement.

The word *“*section,” as used in the charter, must be given a practical meaning in order to carry out the purposes of the law.

In the connection in which the word occurs, it must be held to be qualified by the words “ proposed to be improved,” so that a petition by the majority of the owners on the frontage proposed to be improved is sufficient compliance with the charter to confer, jurisdiction. “ Section *”*cannot mean any arbitrary and uniform length of street, like a block or one-half a mile, but it must refer *347to a portion of a street proposed to be improved, and when that portion is described it is a section of a street.

The petition herein was signed by a majority of the owners on the frontage proposed to be improved.

Bat if there was any doubt about the sufficiency of the petition it was waived by the appellant’s appearing before the commissioners and trying the case upon the merits. The only object of the notice was to get the party duly in court, and having appeared we think all objections to the form of the petition were waived. *Grunberg*v. Blumenlahl, 66 How., 62.

We fail to see any irregularity in the proceedings of the common council or in the appointment of commissioners.

The fact that two of the petitioners attempted to withdraw their names from the petition after the commissioners had been appointed was immaterial. *Town of Springport*v. *Teutonia Savings*Bank, 84 N. Y., 403 ; *People*v. *Sawyer,*52 id., 296.

The award both as to damages for the land taken and for benefits to the remaining land seems to be supported by the evidence; besides the personal examinations made by the commissioners must be given some weight upon these questions. Lewis on Eminent Domain, § 524.

The record fails to show that in making the award the commissioners acted upon any erroneous principle.

We are constrained to think that the decision of the commissioners was not only right in form and substance, but was made upon correct principles.

Order affirmed.

Dykman, J., concurs; Babnabd, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 86 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 86

  To modify the estate recovery provisions of the medicaid program to 
give States the option to recover the costs of home and community-based 
     services for individuals over age 55, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the estate recovery provisions of the medicaid program to 
give States the option to recover the costs of home and community-based 
     services for individuals over age 55, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAID ESTATE RECOVERIES.

    Section 1917(b)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396p(b)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``consisting of--'' and all that 
follows and inserting the following: ``consisting of--
                    ``(i) nursing facility services and related 
                hospital and prescription drug services; and
                    ``(ii) at the option of the State, any additional 
                items or services under the State plan.''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING STATES TO REGULATE GROWTH IN THE NUMBER OF NURSING 
              FACILITY BEDS.

    (a) In General.--A nursing facility shall not receive reimbursement 
under the medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security 
Act, the medicaid program under title XIX of such Act, or any other 
Federal program for services furnished with respect to any beds first 
operated by such facility on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act unless a certificate of need is issued by the State with respect to 
such beds.
    (b) Issuance of Certificate.--A certificate of need may be issued 
by a State with respect to a geographic area only if the ratio of the 
number of nursing facility beds in such area to the total population in 
such area that is likely to need such beds is below the ratio included 
in guidelines that are established by the State and approved by the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services under subsection (c).
    (c) Approval of Guidelines.--The Secretary of Health and Human 
Services shall promulgate regulations under which States may submit 
proposed guidelines for the issuance of certificates of need under 
subsection (b) for review and approval.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
          32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
          OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
          TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
          connection with this Annual Report of Maxlife Fund Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
          10-KSB for the year ending August 31, 2007, as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bennett
          Kurtz, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
          certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
          as
          adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that:
  1.
  
          Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ending August 31, 2007,
          fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.

          The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
          ending August 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of Maxlife Fund
          Corp..
  Dated:
          November 29, 2007
  **MAXLIFE
          FUND CORP.**
  By: 
*/s/
          Bennett Kurtz*
 Bennett
          Kurtz
 Chief
          Executive Officer and
 Chief
          Financial Office