alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.34


                          THE ST. PAUL COMPANIES, INC.
                              385 Washington Street
                            St. Paul, Minnesota 55102




                                                     June 14, 2002



Mr. Jerome T. Fadden
253 Oenoke Ridge Road
New Canaan, CT  06840


Dear Jerry:

                  Reference is made to that certain letter agreement dated
March 3, 2002 between The St. Paul Companies, Inc. (the "Company") and you
(the "Agreement"). Section 6 of the Agreement sets forth the following
sentence:

                           Upon an IPO, you will be entitled to receive a stock
                  option grant to purchase SPR common stock (the "IPO Grant") in
                  an amount equal to 1.5% of the outstanding SPR common stock
                  immediately following the IPO on a fully diluted basis at a
                  price not greater than the initial offering price under the
                  IPO and having a term of ten years.

Such sentence is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                           Upon an IPO, you will be entitled to receive a stock
                  option grant to purchase 975,000 shares of SPR common stock
                  (the "IPO Grant") at the initial offering price under the IPO
                  and having a term of ten years.

                  This amendment to the Agreement is intended to be a binding
obligation upon the Company and yourself. If this amendment to the Agreement
correctly reflects


<PAGE>


Mr. Jerome T. Fadden
June 14, 2002
Page 2


your understanding, please sign and return one copy to John MacColl for the
Company's records.

                                          THE ST. PAUL COMPANIES, INC.



                                          By:
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Jay S. Fishman
                                              Chief Executive Officer




The above amendment to the Agreement correctly reflects our understanding, and
I hereby confirm my agreement to the same as of the date first above written.



           ------------------------
              Jerome T. Fadden
#### Vinesh Kumar SINGH, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-72503

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted September 11, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed September 26, 2017

Nicholas Baran, Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Victor Matthew Lawrence, I, Esquire, Assistant Director, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: KOZINSKI and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

*578MEMORANDUM **

Vinesh Singh argues that the state-created danger doctrine prohibits the federal government from deporting him to Fiji, where it would be harder for him to obtain treatment for.a medical condition he contracted while serving a sentence in a California prison. *See L.W. v. Grubbs,*974 F.2d 119, 121-22 (9th Cir. 1992). We assume for the purposes of this appeal that a deportation could be enjoined based on the state-created danger doctrine. *See Morgan v. Gonzales,*495 F.3d 1084, 1093 (9th Cir. 2007). And we assume that Singh might be entitled to factfinding in a district court if he alleged a colorable claim under that state-created danger doctrine. *See id.*at 1090.

We deny the petition, however, because Singh lacks a colorable claim on the merits.1 Because federal officials were not involved in creating the danger Singh allegedly faces, the law does not require federal officials to protect him from it. *Compare, e.g., Wang v. Reno,*81 F.3d 808, 818 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is 'not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Singh’s request for judicial notice of court documents in another lawsuit is granted. *See*Fed. R. Evid. 201.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.2.1

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                      TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT CORP.
                        1997 DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN


                  1. The first sentence of Article IV of the Total Entertainment
Restaurant Corp 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), is hereby amended
by replacing it with the following sentence.

                           Subject to adjustment in accordance with Article IX
                           hereof, an aggregate of 400,000 Shares of Common
                           Stock, $0.01 par value ("Stock") of the Company shall
                           be subject to the Plan.

                  2. Except as modified by Paragraph 1 above, the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect.

                  3. The foregoing First Amendment to the Total Entertainment
Restaurant Corp. 1997 Directors Stock Option Plan was duly adopted by the Board
of Directors of Total Entertainment Restaurant Corp. (the "Company") on January
10, 2002, and approved by the Company's stockholders at the company's annual
stockholder meeting on May 17, 2002.

                                              /s/ STEVEN M. JOHNSON
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Steven M. Johnson, CEO
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A2 14 3 . SANDERS v . SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, I NC.

Up o n co n s i d era t i o n , t he APPELLANT’ S M OTION TO W ITHDRAW

APPEAL i s h ereb y

GRANTED.

I n t h e ap pel l an t’ s m o ti o n , s h e req u es t ed th at t h i s Co u rt “ wai v e an y co s t s

as s o ci at ed d u e t o h i s [s i c] i n d i g en t s tat u s.” U n d er o u r ru l es , “ Ap p el l a n t a n d

ap p el l an t 's co u n sel are l i ab l e fo r co s t s wh en th e cas e i s d ock et ed .” Co u rt o f Ap p eal s

Ru l e 5

. Th is cas e w as d o ck et ed o n J ul y 1 5

, 2 0 1 5

. No p ay m en t h as b een recei v ed

, an d

t h e reco rd d o es n o t co nt ai n a s u ffi ci en t affi d av it o f i n d i g en cy , as w o u l d ex cu s e

p ay m en t

. Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l es 2 (a), 5 . Acco rd i n g l y t h i s req u es t i s DENIED.

Acco rd i ng t o San d ers ’ n o t i ce o f ap p eal

, s h e ap peal ed fro m a ju d g m en t en t ered

o n M ay 2 2

, 2 0 1 5

. Th e on l y s u ch ju d g m en t i n t h e reco rd was en t ered ag ai n s t h er

co u ns el of reco rd Grad y A

. Ro b ert s , III, an d Ro bert s Law, LLC, jo i n t l y an d s ev eral l y ,
p u rs u an t t o th is Co u rt ’ s M ay 1 5

, 20 1 5 o rd er, as a p en al ty fo r t h e fi l i n g a fri v o l ou s

ap p li cat io n , Cas e No

. A1 5 D0 3 7 9 ; ju dg m en t w as n o t en t ered ag ai n s t San ders

. To t h e

ex t en t Ro b ert s an d Ro b ert s Law, LLC, so u gh t t o ap p eal t h e M ay 2 2

, 2 0 1 5 ju d g m en t

ag ai n s t t h em , s u ch ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r fai l u re t o p ay co s t s o r fi l e a

s u ffi ci en t affi d av it o f i n di g en cy , as req u i red

. September 03, 2015C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/03/2015
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of PURE Bioscience (the Company) hereby
certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

| | (i)        the
accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended October
31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |     |                                        
|----------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------
|Date: December 10, 2008 | By: | /s/ Michael L. Krall                   
|                        |     | Michael L. KrallChief Executive Officer

This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sensata Technologies B.V. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|/S/    THOMAS
WROE                 
|Thomas Wroe Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 31, 2011

|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/S/    JEFFREY
COTE                 
|Jeffrey Cote Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 31, 2011

|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/S/    ROBERT
HUREAU                  
|Robert Hureau Chief Accounting Officer

Date: January 31, 2011
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{

NUMBER                 [AMERICAN EAGLE LOGO]                       SHARES







                                  VALESC INC.
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK                20,000,000 SHARES PREFERRED STOCK
       Par Value $.0001                            Par Value $.0001 Per Share



                                        SPECIMEN
THIS CERTIFIES THAT_____________________________________________________

owner of _____________________________shares of the PREFERRED STOCK of VALESC
INC., fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only on the books of the
Corporation in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

         The corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so
requests, a statement of the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional, or other special rights of each class of stock or
series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such
preferences and/or rights.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to
be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this __________ day of _____________A.D.________.





____________________________                         ________________________
          SECRETARY                                           PRESIDENT



{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{CORPORATE SEAL{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR19-319: NIDDK Central 
Repositories Non-renewable Sample Access (X01).
    Date: May 6, 2022.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health Room, 7349, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e6e1e3f1e9eac4eaede0e0efaaeaedecaae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8cacdcfddc5c6e8c6c1ccccc386c6c1c086cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 11, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05562 Filed 3-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  Re: GSAMP Trust 2006-HE7 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2006-HE7, issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
  dated as of October 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among
  GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Litton Loan Servicing LP, as a
  Servicer, Avelo Mortgage, L.L.C., as a Servicer, The Bank of New York, as
  a Custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as a Custodian, Deutsche Bank
  National Trust Company, as a Custodian, LaSalle Bank National Association,
  as Trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator and
  Master Servicer, GSAMP Trust 2006-HE7.

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A ("Annual Report"),
     and all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report,
     the "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by
     this Annual Report, of the Trust;

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
     any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
     with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the compliance statements required in this
     Annual Report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
     Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required to be included
     in this Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
     Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
     this Annual Report, except as otherwise disclosed in this Annual Report.
     Any material instances of non-compliance described in such reports have
     been disclosed in this Annual Report.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     LaSalle Bank National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
     Master Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.


     Dated:    May 21, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      22,721,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,033,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                   208,029
<INVENTORY>                                  3,211,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,093,103
<PP&E>                                       2,798,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 837,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,834,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,995,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,628,053
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,925,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,834,427
<SALES>                                      2,902,254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,902,254
<CGS>                                        1,988,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,988,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,103,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             280,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,908,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,700,773)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,208,221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,208,221)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 666 

To adapt to changing crude oil market conditions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. BARTON (for himself, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

CHABOT, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. SALMON, Mr. PITTENGER, Mr. FLORES, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. 

CARTER of Texas, and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To adapt to changing crude oil market conditions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 The Congress finds that— 

5 (1) the United States has enjoyed a renaissance 

6 in energy production, establishing the United States 

7 as the world’s leading oil producer; 

8 (2) the United States upholds a commitment to 

9 free trade and open markets and has consistently 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 666 IH

1 opposed attempts by other nations to restrict the 

2 free flow of energy; and 

3 (3) the United States should remove all restric4 tions on the export of crude oil, which will provide 

5 domestic economic benefits, enhanced energy secu6 rity, and flexibility in foreign diplomacy. 

7 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

8 Section 103 of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

9 Act (42 U.S.C. 6212) and the item relating thereto in the 

10 table of contents of that Act are repealed. 

11 SEC. 3. NATIONAL POLICY ON OIL EXPORT RESTRICTION. 

12 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to pro13 mote the efficient exploration, production, storage, supply, 

14 marketing, pricing, and regulation of energy resources, in15 cluding fossil fuels, no official of the Federal Government 

16 shall impose or enforce any restriction on the export of 

17 crude oil. 

18 SEC. 4. STUDY AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 

19 Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 

20 of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall conduct a study 

21 and transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

22 of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

23 Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate recVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:51 Feb 10, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H666.IH H666

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 666 IH

1 ommendations on the appropriate size, composition, and 

2 purpose of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 04, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 04, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0172. DANIEL MADDOX, JR. v. ATLANTA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL SYSTEM

et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014CV243078