EX-34 (j)
(logo) KPMG


KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Advisory Committee of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
an indirect subsidiary of Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Assertion of Compliance, that Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Subsidiaries
("the Company"), an indirect subsidiary of Credit Suisse (USA), Inc., complied
with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the primary servicing
of publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities (the "Platform"), excluding servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i),
1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance
with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the
selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine
whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions
or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying Management's Assertion of Compliance, for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122 (d)(4)(x),
1122(d) (4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), the Company has engaged
various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria.
The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer'
as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to
take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC
Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone
Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06,
the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(vii),
1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122(d) (4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and
1122(d)(4)(xiii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation
17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
February 27, 2007