alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Great China Mania Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. 

 

Dated:  April 15, 2011

By: /s/ Yau Wai Hung

Yau Wai Hung

*Chief Executive Officer and President*

(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT** **32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the
      “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan
      He and Lin Tang, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best
      of
      our knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.




April
      2,
      2007




/s/ Xiaoan
              HeXiaoan
                He
              Chief
                Executive Officer




/s/ Lin
                TangLin
                  Tang
                Chief
                  Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Jeffery W. Merecka, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2008,of Stewart & Stevenson LLC;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presentedin this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:April 29, 2008         By:   /s/  JEFFERY W. MERECKA    **Jeffery W. Merecka**    **Vice President, Chief Financial Officer**
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Real Paper Displays, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Daniel A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                April 14, 2008
            
            /s/
                Daniel A. HansonBy:
                Daniel A. HansonIts:
                Chief Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Real Paper Displays, Inc. and will be retained by Real Paper Displays, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-008]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed March 7, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through March 14, 2022 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20220030, Final, BR, WY, Adoption--Leavitt Reservoir Expansion 
Project, Review Period Ends: 04/18/2022, Contact: Shain L. Wright 307-
261-5664.

    The Bureau of Reclamation (BR) has adopted the Bureau of Land 
Management's Final EIS No. 20190076, filed 4/24/2019 with the 
Environmental Protection Agency. The BR was not a cooperating agency on 
this project. Therefore, republication of the document is necessary 
under Section 1506.3(c) of the CEQ regulations.

EIS No. 20220031, Final, USCG, Other, Waterways Commerce Cutter 
Acquisition, Review Period Ends: 04/18/2022, Contact: Andrew Haley 202-
372-1821.
EIS No. 20220032, Draft, FHWA, SC, Bishopville Truck Route Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 05/09/2022, Contact: Jeffrey Belcher 803-253-3187.
EIS No. 20220033, Third Draft Supplemental, USN, AK, Gulf of Alaska 
Navy Training Activities, Comment Period Ends: 05/02/2022, Contact: 
Kimberly Kler 360-315-5103.
EIS No. 20220034, Draft Supplement, USACE, LA, West Shore Lake 
Pontchartrain Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction Study, Comment 
Period Ends: 05/02/2022, Contact: Landon Parr 504-862-1908.
EIS No. 20220035, Draft, NOAA, OR, Western Oregon State Forests Habitat 
Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 05/17/2022, Contact: Michelle 
McMullin 541-957-3378.

    Dated: March 14, 2022.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-05736 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Garibay MENDOZA-ROMERO, a.k.a. Javier Garibay-Romero, a.k.a. Jose Mendoza-Romero, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50431

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

FILED NOVEMBER 20, 2017

Rosario Torres Gonzalez,' Helen H. Hong, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee,

Robert L, Swain, Esquire, Law Offices of Robert L. Swain, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Garibay Mendoza-Romero appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.- § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendoza-Romero first argues that the district court erred in relying on his prior conviction for robbery under California Penal Code § 211 to impose a 12-level crime of violence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), This contention is foreclosed. *See United States v. Becerril-*Lopez, 541 F.3d 881, 893 (9th Cir. 2008) (a conviction for robbery under California Penal Code § 211 is a categorical crime of violence); *see also United States v. Chavez-Cuevas,*862 F.3d 729, 740 (9th Cir. 2017) (affirming continuing viability of *Bec*erril-Lopez).

Mendoza-Romero next claims that his sentence is substantively unreasonable.in light of the decrease in the seriousness of his criminal offenses over time and other mitigating factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Mendoza-Romero’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Contrary to Mendoza-Romero’s suggestion, the record reflects that the court considered his mitigating arguments. The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Mendoza-Romero’s criminal and immigration history;, *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41352 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DESMON CHARLES EASTER, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-33-1

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Desmon Charles Easter appeals his conviction for conspiring to possess 50 grams or more of a mixture containing cocaine base with intent to distribute. He contends that the indictment was impermissibly vague because it failed to allege the dates of the conspiracy with any specificity. Because he did not challenge the indictment in the district court, this court reviews for plain error. United States v. Cotton , 535 U.S. 625, 629-31 (2002). The date of the offense is not an essential element thatNo. 05-41352 -2- must be charged in the indictment. United States v. Lokey, 945 F.2d 825, 832 (5th Cir. 1991). Moreover, Easter has not established that his substantial rights were affected by any error in the date alleged on the indictment. See Cotton , 535 U.S. at 631. Easter contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because the Government did not prove at his trial that all the conspirators named in the indictment were involved in the conspiracy. He has not established that the Government had a duty to prove the involvement of all other conspirators at a trial where Easter was the only defendant. See United States v. Hernandez-Palacios , 838 F.2d 1346, 1348-49 (5th Cir. 1988) (defendant can be convicted of conspiracy even if his codefendants have been acquitted); cf. United States v. Morris , 46 F.3d 410, 420-22 (5th Cir. 1995)(although Government required to provide proof of the knowledge and participation of “each alleged conspirator,” court reviewed evidence only of the appealing defendants’ knowledge and participation). Easter asserts alternatively that the failure to prove a seven-person conspiracy, as alleged in the indictment, constituted a fatal variance resulting in reversible error. He has not established that he is entitled to relief on this ground.
See Berger v. United States , 295 U.S. 78, 81 (1935). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit



Exhibit (10)MM



Amendment
to
Target Corporation Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement  
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)
    
This Amendment is made to the Target Corporation Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) (the “Trust Agreement”) by and between Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”) and State Street Bank and Trust Company (the “Trustee”).
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the definition of a covered Plan under the Trust Agreement to eliminate inclusion of both awards issued under the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan that are treated as “deferred compensation” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, and Board of Director consulting fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby amend the Trust Agreement, as follows:
1.Section 1(f)(5) is amended effective January 1, 2009 by changing the cross reference contained therein from “Section 13(e)” to “Section 13(f).”
2.Appendix A is amended and restated effective October 1, 2017 to read as follows:
APPENDIX A


The following plans maintained by Company or any other Employer which has indicated in writing its acceptance of the Trust to Trustee and Company are “Plans” covered by the Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement:


		
	Ÿ
	Target Corporation Officer EDCP (formerly known as Target Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan--Senior Management Group)


		
	Ÿ
	Target Corporation DDCP (formerly known as Target Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Plan)


		
	Ÿ
	Target Corporation EDCP (formerly known as Executive Deferred Compensation Plan)


		
	Ÿ
	Officer Deferred Compensation Plan


		
	Ÿ
	SPP I (formerly known as Supplemental Pension Plan I)


		
	Ÿ
	SPP II (formerly known as Supplemental Pension Plan II)


		
	Ÿ
	SPP IV (formerly known as Supplemental Pension Plan IV)


		
	Ÿ
	SPP V (formerly known as Supplemental Pension Plan V)


		
	Ÿ
	Pilot Supplemental Pension


		
	Ÿ
	Individual deferred compensation agreements to the extent the agreement requires the obligation to be funded under a rabbi trust.











In addition, the following programs are also “Plans,” but solely with respect to individuals whose employment or directorship with the Employers has terminated prior to the date a contribution is required under Section 1(f) due to a potential Change of Control:


		
	Ÿ
	Executive Survivor Benefit Plan


		
	Ÿ
	Income Continuation Plan (formerly known as the Income Continuance Policy or the SMG Income Continuance Policy)


		
	Ÿ
	Excess Long Term Disability Plan




		
	3.
	Appendix B is amended and restated effective October 1, 2017 to remove, without replacement, the definitions for Supplemental Pension Plan III and Board of Director Consulting Fee.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers this 25th day of October, 2017.
	
		
	COMPANY


By: /s/ Stephanie Lundquist                      
Name:     Stephanie Lundquist 
Title:       EVP & Chief HR Officer


	TRUSTEE


By: /s/ Jason Landry                       
Name:    Jason Landry
Title:    Vice President
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) and Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the following authorities, subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 614(a)(3) and section 652 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), in order to provide immediate military assistance to Ukraine:

(1) the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether it is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish up to $250 million in assistance without regard to any provision of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA; and

(2) the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an aggregate value of $350 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, and to make the determinations required under such section to direct such a drawdown.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-05615

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Curtis Lee WATSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN-FCI HAZELTON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6641

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 2017

Decided: September 28, 2017

Curtis Lee Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*782Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Lee Watson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Watson v. Warden,*No. 2:16-cv-00076-JPB-JES (N.D.W. Va. May 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
|  | (1) | the      annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ending      December 31, 2007 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the    Report. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Peter R.      Frank             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Peter      R. Frank                                                                                  |
| Chief      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial      Officer                     |

----