alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1428 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1428

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1428/2002 of 2 August 2002 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 609/2001 as regards the implementation of certain provisions for 2002 **

*
Official Journal L 206 , 03/08/2002 P. 0008 - 0008 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1428/2002

of 2 August 2002

derogating from Regulation (EC) No 609/2001 as regards the implementation of certain provisions for 2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 545/2002(2), and in particular Article 48 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 609/2001(3) lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards operational programmes, operational funds and Community financial assistance.

(2) Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 609/2001 sets 31 August as the latest date for paying financial assistance to the producer organisations. Annex II thereto sets 1 June and 1 October as the dates by which the Member States must have sent their information to the Commission.

(3) These provisions impose particular administrative constraints on the Member States again this year, compared to Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/97(4) (previously in force), because of the derogation regarding the operational funds for 2000 provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1120/2001(5). In order to allow the Member States to process the applications for financial assistance from the Member States, a new time limit of 15 October 2002 should be set for paying the financial assistance under Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 609/2001, where the operational funds for 2001 are concerned.

(4) It is therefore appropriate to set a new deadline of 31 October 2002 for the Member States transmission of information on 2001 to the Commission pursuant to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 609/2001.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Member States may postpone aid payments to producer organisations under Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 609/2001 in respect of the operational funds for 2001, until 15 October 2002 at the latest.

Article 2

Member States shall send the Commission the information referred to in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 609/2001 for 2001 by 31 October 2002 at the latest.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 84, 28.3.2002, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 90, 30.3.2001, p. 4.

(4) OJ L 62, 4.3.1997, p. 9.

(5) OJ L 153, 8.6.2001, p. 10.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT


The Supervisory Board
DaimlerChrysler AG:

The audits of DaimlerChrysler AG and subsidiaries ("DaimlerChrysler")
referred to in our report dated February 8, 2002, except for Note 3, which is
as of June 28, 2002, included the related financial statement schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, as
contained in Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A to DaimlerChrysler's Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001. The financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of DaimlerChrysler's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of
other auditors, such financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

Our report refers to DaimlerChrysler's adoption in 2000 of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities," and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-20,
"Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets."

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form F-3 (No. 333-13160) of DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corporation
and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-5074, 333-7082,
333-8998, 333-86934 and 333-86936) of DaimlerChrysler AG of our report dated
February 8, 2002, except for Note 3, which is as of June 28, 2002, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of DaimlerChrysler as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), changes
in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and related financial statement
schedule. Such consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. Our report with respect thereto appears in Amendment No. 1 on Form
20-F/A to DaimlerChrysler's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2001, and was based in part on the report of other auditors. As
discussed above, our report also refers to DaimlerChrysler's adoption in 2000
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and Emerging Issues Task
Force Issue No. 99-20, "Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets."

                                          KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG


Stuttgart, Germany
June 28, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Silton Russell GOUTREAUX, also known as “Pretty Boy”, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11585 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 29, 2017

Shawn Lee Smith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Camille M. Knight, Burleson, Pate & Gibson, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Silton Russell Goutreaux, Pro Se

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Silton Russell Goutreaux appeals his 188-month, sentence of imprisonment for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetaraine, He argues that the district court’s calculation of the amount of drugs that his offense involved rested on statements in the presentence report (PSR) that lacked sufficient indicia of reliability. However, Goutreaux fails to show that the information contained in the PSR was materially untrue, inaccurate, or unreliable. *See United States v. Harris,*702 F.3d 226, 229-31 (5th Cir. 2012). Gou-treaux also challenges the two-level firearm enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l). The district court’s determination that the enhancement applies is a factual finding, which we review for clear error. *United States*v. *King,*773 F.3d 48, 52 (5th Cir. 2014). Goutreaux fails to show that the finding was not plausible in light of the record as a whole. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47,5, the court, has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6313 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize knowingly preventing 

the implantation of certain human embryos, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2016 

Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to criminalize knowingly preventing the implantation of certain human embryos, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Certainty 

5 for Progenitors Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF LIVING HUMAN EMBRYOS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 90A of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6313 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1842. Protection of living human embryos 

2 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever, in or affecting interstate 

3 or foreign commerce, having physical custody of a living 

4 human embryo, refuses to release the embryo for implan5 tation in a willing implantee at the request of one of the 

6 progenitors of that embryo shall be fined under this title 

7 or imprisoned not more than 3 months, or both. 

8 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION FOR PROGENITOR.—A progenitor of 

9 the embryo that is not implanted may not be prosecuted 

10 under this section. 

11 ‘‘(c) PROGENITOR.—The term ‘progenitor’ means 

12 any individual who provides an egg or a sperm cell from 

13 which the embryo is created.’’. 

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

15 at the beginning of chapter 90A of title 18, United States 

16 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘Sec. 1842. Protection of living human embryos.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

19 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
#### David Matthew HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. G. CLINE; Robert S. Castle; Tyler Nelson; Shane Woodrum; and Timothy Browning, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1903

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 28, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Lonnie C. Simmons, DITRAPANO, BARRETT, DIPIERO, MCGINLEY *&*SIMMONS PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. M. Andrew Brison, Valerie F. Price, ANSPACH MEEKS EL-LENBERGER LLP, Charleston, West Virginia; Stephanie H. Ojeda, Mark W. Browning, HENDRICKSON & LONG, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before KING, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not'binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Matthew Harvey appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Har*
      *134
      *vey v. Cline,*No. 2:15-cv-14091, 2017 WL 8274346, 2016 WL 3647962, 2016 WL 1562950 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017; July 1, 2016; Apr. 18, 2016); *see also Magee v. Racing Corp. of W. Va.,*2017 WL 4993455 (W. Va. Nov. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 47 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies consisting 
of 3 Senators and 3 Representatives, to be appointed by the President 
of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, 
respectively, is authorized to make the necessary arrangements for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of the 
United States on the 20th day of January 1997.

            Passed the Senate March 20, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 47

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To provide for a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies.
```
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■ ■

■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
EXHIBIT 2.3

                             AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment")  dated as of March 23, 1998, is by and
between Walsh  International  Inc., a Delaware  corporation  (the "Company") and
Harris Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agents (the "Rights Agent").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS,  the Company and the Rights  Agent  entered  into an Agreement
dated as of October 14, 1997, (the "Agreement");

         WHEREAS, the Company by action of its Board of Directors has decided to
amend the  definition of  "Acquiring  Person" in the Agreement as set forth more
fully below and in  accordance  with the terms of the  Agreement has so directed
the Rights Agent.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

         1. Unless otherwise defined herein, terms used herein are as defined in
the Agreement.

         2. The Agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following provision
at the end of the definition of "Acquisition Person" in Section 1:

                  Notwithstanding the foregoing,  Cognizant  Corporation and any
                  of its direct or indirect wholly-owned  subsidiaries shall not
                  be deemed to be an Acquiring Person if any one or more of such
                  companies  become a Beneficial  Owner of 15 percent or more of
                  the Common Shares of the Company pursuant to either the Merger
                  Agreement of even date herewith among  Cognizant  Corporation,
                  WAC Inc. and the Company or the Stock Option Agreement of even
                  date herewith between Cognizant Corporation and the Company.

         3. From and after March 23, 1998, all references in the Agreement shall
be deemed to be references to the Agreement as amended hereby.

         4. Except as modified  or  supplemented  in  connection  herewith,  the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

                                       17
<PAGE>


         5. This Amendment may be executed in any manner of counterparts, all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed as of the date first set
forth above.

WALSH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By: /s/ Leonard R. Benjamin
    ----------------------------------
Name:  Leonard R. Benjamin
Title: Vice President

HARRIS TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK,
AS RIGHTS AGENT

By: /s/ Brian R. Sahlin
    ----------------------------------
Name:  Brian R. Sahlin
Title: Assistant Vice President

                                       18
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 99
 
                                PRESS RELEASE

TMCI ELECTRONICS, INC. ANNOUNCES THE ACQUISITION OF A WIRE CABLE AND HARNESS 
MANUFACTURER LOCATED IN SAN JOSE

    SAN JOSE, California, November 12, 1996--TMCI Electronics, Inc. (NASDAQ
Small Cap: TMEI) announced today that it has acquired the San Jose-Based wire
cable and harness manufacturing business of Pen Interconnect Inc. Under the
terms of the agreement, TMCI acquired 100% of the business and net assets of
Pen's San Jose Division, for a total purchase price of $3,300,000, consisting
of cash, notes, and shares of TMCI Electronics, Inc. stock. The business will
operate as a part of Touche Electronics, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
TMCI Electronics, Inc.

    "We are delighted to have completed the acquisition of Pen's wire cable and
harness manufacturing business. It will allow TMCI to provide a broader array
of services to our customers," said Rolando Loera, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of TMCI. "The completion of this
acquisition will allow TMCI to further satisfy the rapidly growing demand for
outsourcing of contract manufacturing services," Mr. Loera added.

    TMCI Electronics, Inc., headquartered in San Jose, is the parent of Touche
Manufacturing Co. Inc. ("Touche") and Touche Electronics, Inc. ("TEI"). Touche
manufactures and assembles custom designed metal cabinets and enclosures for
original equipment manufacturers of computers, telecommunications equipment,
semiconductor manufacturing test equipment and medical testing equipment. TEI
provides value-added turnkey services to Touche's OEM and other customers.
TMCI's common stock is listed on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the symbol
TMEI.

                  CONTACT:   Charles E. Shaw, Vice President - CFO
                             408-272-5700
# EUR-Lex - 32001R2105 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R2105

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2105/2001 of 26 October 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 1093/2001 as regards hemp imports **

*
Official Journal L 283 , 27/10/2001 P. 0011 - 0011 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2105/2001

of 26 October 2001

amending Regulation (EC) No 1093/2001 as regards hemp imports

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 of 27 July 2000 on the common organisation of the markets in flax and hemp grown for fibre(1), and in particular Articles 9 and 14 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) New rules relating to hemp imports are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1093/2001(2), amending Regulation (EC) No 245/2001(3) laying down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000. Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1093/2001 stipulates that those rules must apply from 1 November 2001.

(2) The creation of national measures corresponding to the new rules on hemp imports requires major national legislative, administrative and practical changes. As a result, some Member States may not be able to guarantee application of the new rules on the envisaged date, 1 November 2001. The Member States should be granted sufficient extra time to ensure that the rules enter into force at the same time and in the same way, so a new date of 1 May 2002 should be set for application of the new rules. As a consequence, the control measures in force prior to the former date must continue in application until 30 April 2002.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Natural Fibres,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1093/2001, the date "1 November 2001" is replaced by "1 May 2002" and the date "31 October 2001" is replaced by "30 April 2002".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 16.

(2) OJ L 150, 6.6.2001, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 35, 6.2.2001, p. 18.
### NUM BER 13-0 8-00 429- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ IN THE INTEREST OF H.J. R.T. , A CHILD

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On ap pe al f rom th e 1 35t h Dist rict C ou rt o f D e W itt Co un ty , T exas .

____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ch ief Ju stice Va lde z an d Ju stice s Y añ ezan d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t per

fected an appeal from a jud g ment rendered ag ain st her i n fav or of app ellee. On Octo ber 14, 200 8, the Clerk of this Court not if ied ap pellan t tha t the clerk's record in the abo v e cau se w as originally due on Au gust 19, 2008 , and tha t the district clerk, Tabeth G ardner , had noti fied th is C our t t hat a ppel lan t fail ed to make ar ra ng ements for payme nt of

the clerk's record. T he Clerk of this Court not if ied ap pellan t of this defect so that ste ps coul d be ta ke n t o c o rrect t he defect , i f it coul d be done. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 37.3( b) , 42. 3( b)

. Appel lan t was adv is ed th at, if the defect was not c orre ct e d within ten2

days from the date of rec eip t of thi s n oti ce, the appeal woul d be dis mis sed fo r wan t of prosec uti on. On N ov ember

3, 2008, the C ler k o f the C our t not ified appel lan t t hat s he was del inq uent in re mitt ing a $175.00 fili ng fee. The C ler k o f this C our t not ified appel lan t t hat the a ppeal w as subj ect to dis mis sal i f the fil ing fee w as not p aid w it hin ten day s from the date of rec eip t of thi s l etter

. See id. 42.3 (c ). Appel lan t has fail ed to fail ed to respon d to thi s C our t’ s n oti ces . Acc o rd ing ly , t he appeal is DIS MI SSED FORW AN T OF PROSE CU TION

. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42 .3(b),(c).

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 12th day

of Febr uar

y , 200 9.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2018

a1217 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2018

157318

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157318

COA: 335316

Kent CC: 06

- 012242

- FC

GIOVANNI KOESE

- ERIC CASPER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 40

To provide for the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24, 1995

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the appointment of Anne D’Harnoncourt as

a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expira7 tion of the term of Samuel Curtis Johnson of Wisconsin

8 on December 4, 1995, is filled by the appointment of Anne

9 D’Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania. The appointment is for
2

•SJ 40 IS

1 a term of six years and shall take effect on December 5,

2 1995.

Æ