alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0235 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0235

**2002/235/EC: Commission Decision of 13 March 2002 amending Decision 97/245/EC, Euratom laying down the arrangements for the transmission by Member States to the Commission of certain information under the Communities' own resources system (notified under document number C(2002) 416) **

*
Official Journal L 079 , 22/03/2002 P. 0061 - 0065 *

Commission Decision

of 13 March 2002

amending Decision 97/245/EC, Euratom laying down the arrangements for the transmission by Member States to the Commission of certain information under the Communities' own resources system

(notified under document number C(2002) 416)

(2002/235/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom of 31 October 1994 on the system of the Communities' own resources(1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 on the system of the Communities' own resources(2), implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1355/96(3), the Council adopted provisions designed to improve certain parts of the arrangements for Member States to report to the Commission about action they have taken to recover own resources, in particular where fraud and irregularities are involved.

(2) On that basis, the Commission adopted Decision 97/245/EC, Euratom on 20 March 1997 laying down the arrangements for the transmission of information to the Commission by the Member States under the own resources system(4).

(3) For reasons of cost-effectiveness, the use of the available sources of information should be rationalised by concentrating in particular on information relating to cases of fraud and irregularities that are representative in terms of impact.

(4) Steps should be taken to capitalise on the experience acquired in the transmission of requests for write-offs and to improve the presentation of the form used to that end.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are consistent with the opinion of the Advisory Committee on own resources provided for in Article 20 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex VI of Decision 97/245/EC, Euratom is hereby replaced by the new Annex 6 attached to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 2002.

For the Commission

Michaele Schreyer

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 293, 12.11.1994, p. 9.

(2) OJ L 130, 31.5.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 175, 13.7.1996, p. 3.

(4) OJ L 97, 12.4.1997, p. 12.

ANNEX

'

ANNEX VI

>PIC FILE= "L_2002079EN.006203.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2002079EN.006301.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2002079EN.006401.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2002079EN.006501.TIF">
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0382 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0382

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 382/2003 of 28 February 2003 derogating from Regulations (EC) No 1371/95 and (EC) No 1372/95 in 2003 as regards the dates for issuing export licences in the egg and poultrymeat sectors **

*
Official Journal L 055 , 01/03/2003 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 382/2003

of 28 February 2003

derogating from Regulations (EC) No 1371/95 and (EC) No 1372/95 in 2003 as regards the dates for issuing export licences in the egg and poultrymeat sectors

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2002(2), and in particular Article 3(2), Article 8(13) and Article 15 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat(3), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2002, and in particular Article 3(2), Article 8(12) and Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 3(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1371/95(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2260/2001(5), and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1372/95(6), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1383/2001(7), laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the egg and poultrymeat sectors respectively, provides that export licences are to be issued on the Wednesday following the week in which the licence applications are lodged provided that no particular measures have been taken by the Commission in the meantime.

(2) Because of public holidays in 2003 and the irregular publication of the Official Journal of the European Union during those holidays, the period for consideration will be too brief to guarantee proper administration of the market. It should therefore be extended.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Notwithstanding Article 3(3) of Regulations (EC) No 1371/95 and (EC) No 1372/95, licences shall be issued on the dates given in the table below provided that no particular measures, as provided for in paragraph 4 of that Article, have been taken prior to those dates:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49.

(2) OJ L 77, 20.3.2002, p. 7.

(3) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77.

(4) OJ L 133, 17.6.1995, p. 16.

(5) OJ L 305, 22.11.2001, p. 11.

(6) OJ L 133, 17.6.1995, p. 26.

(7) OJ L 186, 7.7.2001, p. 26.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 720

To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to

representations in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 24, 1995

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

relating to representations in court and sanctions for

violating such rule, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. REPRESENTATIONS AND SANCTIONS UNDER

4 RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

5 PROCEDURE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

7 Civil Procedure is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (b)(3) by striking out ‘‘or, if

9 specifically so identified, are likely to have evi-
2

•S 720 IS

1 dentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for

2 further investigation or discovery’’ and inserting in

3 lieu thereof ‘‘or are well grounded in fact’’; and

4 (2) in subsection (c)—

5 (A) in the first sentence by striking out

6 ‘‘may, subject to the conditions stated below,’’

7 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘shall’’;

8 (B) in paragraph (2) by striking out the

9 first and second sentences and inserting in lieu

10 thereof ‘‘A sanction imposed for violation of

11 this rule may consist of reasonable attorneys’

12 fees and other expenses incurred as a result of

13 the violation, directives of a nonmonetary na14 ture, or an order to pay penalty into court or

15 to a party.’’; and

16 (C) in paragraph (2)(A) by inserting be17 fore the period ‘‘, although such sanctions may

18 be awarded against a party’s attorneys’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of this sec20 tion shall take effect 30 days after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act.

Æ
EX-35 (a)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: MABS 2006-AM3

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as
     of October 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
     supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0234 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0234

**2003/234/EC: Commission Decision of 2 April 2003 amending Decision 74/360/EEC as regards the United Kingdom's exemption from applying to hemp (Cannabis sativa) Council Directive 2002/57/EC on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (notified under document number C(2003) 1055) **

*
Official Journal L 086 , 03/04/2003 P. 0048 - 0048 *

Commission Decision

of 2 April 2003

amending Decision 74/360/EEC as regards the United Kingdom's exemption from applying to hemp (Cannabis sativa) Council Directive 2002/57/EC on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants

(notified under document number C(2003) 1055)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(2003/234/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/68/EC(2), and in particular Article 28(b) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under Commission Decision 74/360/EEC(3) the United Kingdom was released from the obligation to apply to, inter alia, hemp (Cannabis sativa) provisions of Council Directive 69/208/EEC of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants(4), which has been replaced by Directive 2002/57/EC.

(2) The United Kingdom has informed the Commission that the availability of improved varieties of hemp in the EU Common Catalogue suitable for growing conditions in the United Kingdom has led to the propagation of hemp seed becoming an established practice.

(3) The exemption applying to hemp should therefore be revoked and Decision 74/360/EEC should be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 1 of Decision 74/360/EEC, point (b) is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 2 April 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 74.

(2) OJ L 195, 24.7.2002, p. 32.

(3) OJ L 196, 19.7.1974, p. 18.

(4) OJ L 169, 10.7.1969, p. 3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,460
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,827
<PP&E>                                           5,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,394
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,644
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    258
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
#### Hedwig Sieniewicz, as Administratrix of, the Estate of Feliks Sieniewicz, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Merusad Realty Corp., Respondent.

Argued December 2, 1943;

decided January 13, 1944.

*807
      *Joseph J. Brophy, Edward A. Shandell, Desmond T. Barry*and *Abbott L. Levine*for appellant.

*William J. Tropp*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6105

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
 to designate certain parts of United States Route 264 and the Eastern 
   North Carolina Gateway Corridor as future parts of the Interstate 
                    System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2016

 Mr. Jones (for himself and Mr. Butterfield) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
 to designate certain parts of United States Route 264 and the Eastern 
   North Carolina Gateway Corridor as future parts of the Interstate 
                    System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eastern North Carolina Gateway Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. ROUTE DESIGNATION.

    (a) High-Priority Corridor on National Highway System.--Section 
1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
(105 Stat. 2032; 119 Stat. 1210) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(89) United States Route 264 from its intersection with 
        United States Route 64 (High Priority Corridor 13) near 
        Zebulon, North Carolina, to Greenville, North Carolina.
            ``(90) The Eastern North Carolina Gateway Corridor from 
        United States Route 70 (High Priority Corridor 82) in the 
        vicinity of Kinston, North Carolina, passing in the vicinity of 
        Greenville, North Carolina, to United States Route 64 (High 
        Priority Corridor 13) in the vicinity of Bethel, North 
        Carolina, and generally along the routes of United States Route 
        13 and North Carolina Highway 11.''.
    (b) Future Parts of Interstate System.--Section 1105(e)(5)(A) of 
the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 
2033; 119 Stat. 1213) is amended in the first sentence by striking 
``and subsection (c)(83)'' and inserting ``subsection (c)(83), 
subsection (c)(89), and subsection (c)(90)''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES 3 THROUGH 4 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001005530
<NAME>                        MERIT BEHAVIORAL CARE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         40,731
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  36,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,047
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               81,719
<PP&E>                                         94,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 24,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          84,137
<BONDS>                                        258,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       285
<OTHER-SE>                                     (27,885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,288
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,625
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (219)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,872)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 976

To transfer management of the Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge in

Oklahoma to the State of Oklahoma, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. NICKLES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To transfer management of the Tishomingo National Wildlife

Refuge in Oklahoma to the State of Oklahoma, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF MANAGEMENT OF TISHOMINGO

4 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

5 (a) TRANSFER.—Not later than 30 days after the

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

7 shall transfer, with the consent of the Governor of Okla8 homa, the management of the lands and waters within the

9 Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge in Oklahoma to the

10 State of Oklahoma for administration by the Director of
2

•S 976 IS

1 the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (or

2 any successor agency).

3 (b) MANAGEMENT.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The lands and waters trans5 ferred under subsection (a) shall—

6 (A) be managed for the same uses and in

7 the same manner as the lands were managed by

8 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service

9 prior to 1994; and

10 (B) continue to be a national wildlife ref11 uge.

12 (2) APPLICABLE LAWS.—The laws (including

13 regulations) applicable to the National Wildlife Ref14 uge System established under the National Wildlife

15 Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16

16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.) shall continue to be applicable

17 to the lands and waters on and after the effective

18 date of the transfer under subsection (a).

19 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDING.—For each fiscal

20 year commencing after the date of enactment of this Act,

21 there is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of

22 the Interior to make annual grants to the State of Okla23 homa for management of the lands and waters transferred

24 under subsection (a) an amount equal to 50 percent of
3

•S 976 IS

1 the amount made available to the Secretary of the Interior

2 in fiscal year 1994 for the management of the refuge.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald Anthony FALICE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6856

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Reginald Anthony Falice, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *See United States v. Falice,*No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).

We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*