alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elena TURCAN and Gheorghe Vartic, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-70736

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Albert C. Lum, Sr., Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Albert C. Lum, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioners

OIL, Lisa Damiano, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Elena Turcan and Gheorghe Vartic, natives and citizens of Moldova, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration'judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. *Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

In finding Turcan not credible, the agency relied on the omissions from Turcan’s written statement that the police knew of her Roma ethnicity at the time of her arrest in March 2004, and references by medical personnel to Turcan’s Roma ethnicity after her bus accident. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. *See id.*at 1048; *see also Zamanov v. Holder,*649 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2011) (omission constituting a material alteration of petitioner’s story may support an adverse credibility determination). Turcan’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. *See Zamanov,*649 F.3d at 974. In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, petitioners’ asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Turcan’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and she does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than npt she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in Moldova. *See id.*at 1156-57.

We reject Turcan’s contention that the agency erred by accepting her witness as a quasi-expert.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plastic2Oil, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018, I, Rick
Heddle, Chief Financial Officer of Plastic2Oil Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such Annual Report
    on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The information
    contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, fairly presents, in all material respects,
    the financial condition and results of operations of Plastic2Oil, Inc.



|Date:
    June 3, 2019 | By: | /s/
    Rick Heddle        
|---------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                       |     | Rick
    Heddle            
|                       |     | Chief
    Financial Officer
#### Amaida Morales BONILLA Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 17-1204

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 2017

Filed: November 14, 2017

Subhash Chandra, Omaha, NE, for Petitioner

Allison Frayer, Melissa Katherine Lott, Carl H. McIntyre, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Amaida Morales Bonilla petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) adopting the decision of an immigration judge (IJ) denying her application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1) (permitting cancellation of removal for an alien (1) physically present in the United States continuously for at least ten years immediately preceding her application, (2) of good moral character during that time, (3) not convicted of listed offenses, and (4) whose removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to qualifying relatives). As relevant, the IJ and BIA found that Bonilla failed to establish two of the requirements for cancellation of removal: continuous physical presence in the United States and the necessary hardship to her children.

In this Court, Bonilla challenges the determination that she did not meet the requirement for continuous physical presence. We need not consider this challenge, however, because Bonilla raised no legal or constitutional challenge to the discretionary finding that she had not shown exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her children, should she be deported. See INS v. Bagamasbad, 429 U.S. 24, 25, 97 S.Ct. 200, 50 L.Ed.2d 190 (1976) (per curiam) (“As a general rule courts and agencies are not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the results they reach.”); see also Gomez v. Lynch, 642 Fed.Appx. 649, 649-50 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (unpublished) (concluding that “[u]nder the conjunctive language of section 1229b(b)(1), [the petitioner] had to meet all four prerequisites for cancellation of removal,” so the discretionary hardship determination was dis-positive).

We deny the petition.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Norman Kunin, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ecologic Transportation, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ecologic Transportation, Inc.                                                         

Dated: March 31, 2011

/s/ Norman Kunin
Norman Kunin
Chief Financial Officer 
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer)
Ecologic Transportation, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Ecologic Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Ecologic Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Sharmon MABLE, Appellant

No. 16-3090

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 18, 2017

l:14-cr-00233-RJL-l

Elizabeth Trosman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USAO Appellate Counsel, *642U.S. Attorney’s Office (USA), Appellate Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Sandra Gayle Roland, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender (FPD), Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal of her appeal and the affidavit in support thereof, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted, and this case be dismissed. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 34-35 (2016).

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court.
lt>AHDr«Lia tlDiaHAL AIIPOItT 

G 

IDAHO 

FALLS 

rn-»r n 

Ai]eiist23.20U] 

Hie HooonUe R ^ LaHood 

Secrets^ of l^oispattatun 

ILS. DepatmBit ofTnmspaitalion 

400 7tliSlnetSW 

WashinelDivDC 20590 

D HT Secretny LaHood: 

The Iddio nd k EleB><>nd Anport (niU^) serves the Ui^st axamunity in eastETQ bU ^ 

jtMrtwtf^nt^ftmrt,ftnrt^n^iMiilltMw^^nimtJjmfmtl^tinnm*xr^virfMnn,nOn. AsofAuCUSt 22,2010. WeloStWesdMIUIKlair 

service tpBope and odiertoeakiiis i n the Pacific ItotliwgM. such Mg(MUl^Poidaiid,Spotaiia Mad No ^ 

as wd l as CDOiecticms tD intenuiiaiul dcstiiuliaDS from lliose Iniljs. 

This dHogp is not due to a Udc of dcBiaiid, wliidi is dbiBidanL [ioDes flyine west 6wn Idalio Falb ai^ 

pafta'd. and emp ^ seats are the Mceptinnralher than the mle. Instead the dianeeKsuks from Horixon'siiKenui 

deosiao It) laDve to a siiie^ airotoft 6eeti 

If ant Wjiiacedbyaiipdiif caiTier.die loss of these Horiaonfli^aaiqireseids a«oiifirantbliiwtprEgUMial ecnnnniir 

derdqiientOurbipmesslmili i i idBweiniUfrt-jKyiestmaiiTe s need air «ecBStoonrsUteca|«tJiii Boise, jiii s 

aifpoit is Sah [jk e <Sly, a 3,S-hoar drive. 

OBT copiinpniqf is hiane to dieldd»HaticmaiI^buwu»y, the CeuiijturAdTapged Energy Stm^ ^ 

eciBhwcieJ wiriiihe US. Bjveiiiiueui. Mid several UayaerinJligal and mpdiraieon^Mme^inchi^^ 

Ttm i Mirt<«»»»l PJA ^ •»MI4 I ax M^l»Wil»minnaI <ti»««r«, «fa l»wnrr«, am i KIMI-jnr.»atiM> J .li»Oit>arimw- A jlaMM j 

reeJooal Evciils (^otB'in Idalu Rdb ivlhe r fiieb the need far rehibfe ii^bairad/aiitboimd Uaha Falk ai^ 

* ""ftirai H \n ¥ 'i f »ir ' •• " " " " ^ *l-lia''y^ y "V^ cignili«-»iitlyhnrr J T m. ^ »»(j.im l pnrttl i tMtrtrm-t -tmrym i ra n lul p n t 

joniMrt^ ^ tM« «B«a»iAmgMim i lan-bn-al .<ty nllw-tji< and ilir[tml»iaill l tlil l III illwiljf j lllUllllla l lll'W IW VJI > |IHHill n I 

j.Mlna«iltT..»»»t»fr»ufcti.i«i«tii«tl>art-aM»ran4»'illrti»>uil».i l nmamamr «<iiiia>n. W e dMjrfbr e StTOP ^ SimW l llie 

new vKsdMNnKl senioa «id we iBBeytw tD psBBt mu' s reqaest 

/ /•" " . ••; , 

(.i7u<i|'' .A"'f- .•'•''VPresdoit 

'-i^-Ytl-Jf^,--

linda K, KartB, CEcD 

CEO 

CCs M^arlaredndiriniaaldalto Falls 

LenNdsan,IFItA 

1S1 Noitti Ridge. Suite 13a Maho Fofe. ID KM02 

PH: 20S-522-a014/FX20B-£32-3a24/TalFf««M0-f00-20>4 

www.growidatKi4afe.ar9 

Idaho Falls Regional Airport - Small Community Air Service Development Grant - August 2010 20
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jaime Elario RAMOS-CALLEROS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41601 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 14, 2017

*379Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jaime Elario Ramos-Calleros, Pro Se

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jamie Elario Ramos-Calleros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Calleros has not filed a response, We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review, especially in light of the district court’s statement that Ramos-Calleros’s sentence was appropriate irrespective of the Guidelines range. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cm. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Diario Oficial C 34/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0928
  doi:10.3000/19770928.C_2014.034.spa |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 34 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 57o año5 de febrero de 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0928

doi:10.3000/19770928.C_2014.034.spa

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 34

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

57o año5 de febrero de 2014

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Parlamento Europeo |
| 2014/C 034/01 | Decisión | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

2014/C 034/01

Decisión

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

| 5.2.2014 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 34/1

---

DECISIÓN

2014/C 34/01

EL SECRETARIO GENERAL DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO,

VISTA el Reglamento (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 259/68 del Consejo (1), modificado por el Reglamento (CE, Euratom) no 723/2004 (2) y, en último lugar, por el Reglamento (UE, Euratom) no 1080/2010 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 24 de noviembre de 2010, por el que se modifica el Estatuto de los funcionarios de las Comunidades Europeas y el régimen aplicable a los otros agentes de las Comunidades (3), y en particular el artículo 30 de dicho Estatuto,

VISTA la Decisión de la Mesa de 3 de mayo de 2004 sobre el ejercicio de los poderes de la autoridad facultada para proceder a los nombramientos (AFPN) y de la autoridad facultada para proceder a las contrataciones (AFPC), modificada por la Mesa por última vez el 4 de mayo de 2009,

VISTA la fecha de expiración, el 31 de diciembre de 2013, de las listas de reserva del Parlamento Europeo siguientes:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S,

Considerando que se ha solicitado a la Comisión paritaria que emita su dictamen en un plazo de 15 días laborables, de conformidad con el artículo 10 bis del Estatuto,

DECIDE:

Artículo 1

El plazo de validez de las listas de reserva siguientes:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S,

queda prorrogado hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2014.

Artículo 2

El plazo de validez de las listas de reserva siguientes:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S,

no se prorroga.

Luxemburgo, 20 de diciembre de 2013.

Klaus WELLE

Secretario General

---

(1)  DO L 56 de 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  DO L 124 de 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  DO L 311 de 26.11.2010, p. 1.

3

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Triangle Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Garland S.
Tucker, III, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    GARLAND S. TUCKER, III
|Garland S. Tucker, III       
|Chief Executive Officer      

March 7, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio Conference of 1992 
        about conservation of the seas;
Whereas 1998 has been declared the ``International Year of the Ocean'' by the 
        United Nations in an effort to alert the world to the need for improving 
        the physical and cultural assets offered by the world's oceans;
Whereas the theme of Expo '98 is ``The Oceans, a Heritage for the Future'';
Whereas Expo '98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, and 
        public opinion to the growing importance of the world's oceans;
Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships through ocean 
        exploration;
Whereas Portugal's history is rich with examples of the courage and exploits of 
        Portuguese explorers;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship based on mutual 
        respect, and a sharing of interests and ideals, particularly the deeply 
        held commitment to democratic values;
Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Portugal; and
Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995 Agreement on 
        Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the 2 countries would consider and 
        develop appropriate means of commemorating the upcoming quincentennial 
        anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by Vasco da Gama: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the United States should fully participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, 
Portugal, and encourage the private sector to support this worthwhile 
undertaking.

            Passed the Senate September 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
              participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, Portugal.
```
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0905 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0905

**2003/905/EC: Commission Decision of 19 December 2003 amending Decision 2002/862/EC laying down specific conditions for imports of fishery products from Kazakhstan (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 4890) **

*
Official Journal L 340 , 24/12/2003 P. 0074 - 0076 *

Commission Decision

of 19 December 2003

amending Decision 2002/862/EC laying down specific conditions for imports of fishery products from Kazakhstan

(notified under document number C(2003) 4890)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/905/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products(1), and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In Commission Decision 2002/862/EC(2), the "Committee of Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (CFFH) of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Protection" is identified as the competent authority in Kazakhstan for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

(2) Following a restructuring of the Kazakhstan administration, the competent authority has changed to the "Veterinary Department of the Ministry of Agriculture (VD-MA)". This new authority is capable of verifying effectively the application of the laws in force.

(3) The VD-MA has provided official assurances on compliance with the standards for health controls and monitoring of fishery and aquaculture products as set out in Directive 91/493/EEC and on the fulfilment of hygienic requirements equivalent to those laid down in that Directive.

(4) Decision 2002/862/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2002/862/EC is amended as follows:

1. Article 1 is replaced by the following:

"Article 1

The 'Veterinary Department of the Ministry of Agriculture (VD-MA)' shall be the competent authority in Kazakhstan for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.";

2. Article 3(2) is replaced by the following:

"2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the VD-MA and the latter's official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements.";

3. Annex I is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 27 December 2003.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 15; Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ L 301, 5.11.2002, p. 48.

ANNEX

"ANNEX I

>PIC FILE= "L_2003340EN.007503.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2003340EN.007601.TIF">"