alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym
Corporation. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen D. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephen D. Allison                    
|                    |  | Stephen D. Allison Chief Financial
Officer
#### INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, General Electric Company Automatic Blanket Plant, Intervenor.

Nos. 19855, 19856.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1966.

Decided Sept. 30, 1966.

*334Miss Marilyn G. Rose, Washington, D. C., with whom Miss Ruth Weyand, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L. R. B., with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel MalletPrevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Wayne S. Bishop, Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent.

Mr. William W. Sturges, Charlotte, N. C., was on the brief for intervenor.

Before Burger, Wright and Tamm, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

These consolidated cases are before the court upon petition of the union to review certain portions of the orders issued by the National Labor Relations Board dismissing in part complaints issued against the General Electric Company. Petitioner raises various points, only one of which merits mention.

The Board, in No. 19,856, barred reopening of the question whether the June 1963 reprimand to employee Bailey was attributable to the employer’s anti-union bias, that question having been settled adversely to the union in the earlier proceeding (No. 19,855). In so doing the Board stated: “[W]e are, we believe, precluded” from re-evaluating the reprimand. If by this language the Board meant that it was required in the circumstances of this case to apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel, it was wrong.

We are constrained to believe, however, that the Board here, in applying collateral estoppel, exercised its discretion in the circumstances of this case. On prior occasions, for example Monroe Feed Store, 112 N.L.R.B. 1336, 1338 (1955), the Board has clearly indicated its understanding that resort to collateral estoppel is governed by sound discretion. Since there was a basis in the record for the Board, exercising its sound discretion, to refuse to re-evaluate the reprimand, we affirm its action.

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5969 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to increase the amount 

that certain banks and savings associations may invest in small business 

investment companies, subject to the approval of the appropriate Federal 

banking agency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, and Mr. KNIGHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 to 

increase the amount that certain banks and savings associations may invest in small business investment companies, subject to the approval of the appropriate Federal 

banking agency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Investing in Main 

5 Street Act of 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5969 IH

1 SEC. 2. INVESTMENT IN SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT 

2 COMPANIES. 

3 Section 302(b) of the Small Business Investment Act 

4 of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 682(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the pe6 riod the following: ‘‘or, subject to the approval of the 

7 appropriate Federal banking agency, 15 percent of 

8 such capital and surplus’’; 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting before the pe10 riod the following: ‘‘or, subject to the approval of the 

11 appropriate Federal banking agency, 15 percent of 

12 such capital and surplus’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(3) APPROPRIATE FEDERAL BANKING AGENCY

15 DEFINED.—For purposes of this subsection, the 

16 term ‘appropriate Federal banking agency’ has the 

17 meaning given that term under section 3 of the Fed18 eral Deposit Insurance Act.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
| 1.     | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for      the Year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of JBI Inc. |

|                      |   |                           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      March 31, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Ron      Baldwin, Jr. |   |
|                      |   | Ron      Baldwin, Jr.          |   |
|                      |   | CFO                            |   |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 11493, March 
1, 2022.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Thursday March 3, 
2022 at 2 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 3, 2022 at 2 p.m., has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: March 2, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04823 Filed 3-3-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 815 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 815

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the assessment 
              and collection of the excise tax on arrows.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 17 (legislative day, May 15), 1995

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the assessment 
              and collection of the excise tax on arrows.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIMPLIFICATION OF IMPOSITION OF EXCISE TAX ON ARROWS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 4161 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of tax) is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(b) Bows and Arrows, Etc.--
            ``(1) Bows.--
                    ``(A) In general.--There is hereby imposed on the 
                sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of any 
                bow which has a draw weight of 10 pounds or more, a tax 
                equal to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.
                    ``(B) Parts and accessories.--There is hereby 
                imposed upon the sale by the manufacturer, producer, or 
                importer--
                            ``(i) of any part of accessory suitable for 
                        inclusion in or attachment to a bow described 
                        in subparagraph (A), and
                            ``(ii) of any quiver suitable for use with 
                        arrows described in paragraph (2),
                a tax equivalent to 11 percent of the price for which 
                so sold.
            ``(2) Arrows.--There is hereby imposed on the sale by the 
        manufacturer, producer, or importer of any shaft, point, nock, 
        or vane of a type used in the manufacture of any arrow which 
        after its assembly--
                    ``(A) measures 18 inches overall or more in length, 
                or
                    ``(B) measures less than 18 inches overall in 
                length but is suitable for use with a bow described in 
                paragraph (1)(A),
        a tax equal to 11 percent of the price for which so sold.
            ``(3) Coordination with subsection (a).--No tax shall be 
        imposed under this subsection with respect to any article 
        taxable under subsection (a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation
85 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-18

Per Section 13.04 of the Master Servicing & Trust Agreement, dated as of
11/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities
Administrator), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:


(i)     a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year
        or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement,
        or such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional
        Servicer, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(ii)    to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
        party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such
        other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer, in all
        material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there
        has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material
        respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
        nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc. (formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:   May 31, 2011
By:
/s/     Andrew EracleousAndrew EracleousChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Vision Pathology and Dysfunction.
    Date: April 8, 2022.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, 6701 Rockledge Dr., 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Robert C Elliott, Ph.D., AB, MS, Scientific 
Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5190, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-3009, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a5acaca9afb4b2af80a3b3b2eeaea9a8eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2821212422393f220d2e3e3f63232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; RFA-RM-21-015: 2022 Pioneer Award Review.
    Date: April 12-14, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: James W Mack, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4154, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
2037, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1974787a72732b597a6a6b37777071377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84e9e5e7efeeb6c4e7f7f6aaeaedecaae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
David W Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05282 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Richard C. FOY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Barack Hussein Obama, Past President of the United States of America; US Department of Justice; US Federal Communication Commission, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2238

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 27, 2017

Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*171Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in ttyis circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard C. Foy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the-record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Foy v. United States,*No. 5:17-cv-00080-D, 2017 WL 3611746 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
f10k2011a1ex10xxxix_yida.htm



Exhibit 10.39




 


[English Summary]







Fujian Jintai Tourism Developments Co., Ltd. Loan Agreement







Borrower/Party A: Fujian Jintai Tourism Developments Co., Ltd.


Lender/Party B: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, Fuzhou Wusi Road Branch







Amount of loan: RMB 87 million







Purpose of loan: RMB 16.9 million for Taining Credit Union’s loan repayment, RMB 70.1 million for tourism destination development and construction







Loan period: 7 years







Interest: 7.76% per annum







Repayment schedule: The 1st repayment date is on April 25, 2012, the repayment amount is RMB 6.21 million. Borrower will repay RMB 6.21 million for every six months, and the last repayment date will be on Oct. 25, 2018, the repayment amount will be RMB 6.27 million.







Guaranty: collateralized by the right to collect resort ticket sales at Great Golden Lake.







Jurisdiction:


Laws of China







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, either party can resolve the dispute by the courts of Fuzhou City.







Date of the Agreement:


Oct. 25, 2011







1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6998 

To ensure equal treatment for certain faith-based organizations in certain 

Small Business Administration programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Mr. MANN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Small Business 

A BILL 

To ensure equal treatment for certain faith-based organizations in certain Small Business Administration programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Assistance and 

5 Impartial Treatment of Help In Small Business Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘FAITH in Small Business Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6998 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING EQUAL TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN 

2 FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS IN CERTAIN 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PRO4 GRAMS. 

5 The proposed rule of the Small Business Administra6 tion titled ‘‘Ensuring Equal Treatment for Faith-Based 

7 Organizations in SBA’s Loan and Disaster Assistance 

8 Programs’’ issued January 19, 2021, shall have the force 

9 and effect of law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### John McDermott, App’lt, *v.*The New York Central *&*Hudson River Railroad Co., Resp’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed February 9, 1891.)*

Master and servant—Negligence—Instructions.

Plaintiff, a machinist’s helper, in the employ of defendant, was directed hy the foreman to couple cars in motion, but was not instructed as to the danger nor as to the proper method of doing the work. *Held,*that it was a question for the jury whether he had such knowledge of the danger as not to require instruction, or whether the injury resulted from his ignorance resulting from lack of instructon, and that it was error to dismiss.

Appeal from judgment, entered on order dismissing the complaint and setting aside verdict pursuant to a stipulation made at the trial.

Action to recover for injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant. On the trial it was stipulated that the court might dismiss the complaint after verdict

The jury rendered a verdict for $1,800.

*Morris & Whitehouse,*for app’lt; *Ashbel Green (Charles J. Patterson,*of counsel), for resp’t.

*34Pratt, J.

The plaintiff, who was a “ machinist’s helper,” was directed by defendant’s foreman to couple cars in motion. This-was a dangerous service, and was not in the course of the employment for which plaintiff had been engaged. He was not instructed as to the danger, nor as to the proper method of doing the work; and the jury have found that his injury resulted from his ignorance, resulting from the lack of instruction.

The rule is well settled that where, by authority of the master, an employe is taken from his ordinary occupation and put to a service with whose dangers he is unacquainted, proper instructions should be given him that he may not be exposed to needless peril.

It is contended for defendant here that the plaintiff had such a knowledge of the dangers he incurred that this rule cannot be invoked for his benefit. We think that was a question for the jury. The charge placed the whole question before them, and they were instructed that the point of the case was, whether plaintiff was hurt because he was not instructed how to do the work properly, and whether, if he had been instructed, he would have escaped.

We are not able to say that the verdict in plaintiff’s favor was-contrary to the evidence. We think the verdict should stand as decisive of the facts in the case. It follows that the order granting a new trial should be reversed, and plaintiff have judgment on the verdict, with costs of circuit and general term.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 39 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the two Houses of Congress assemble in the Hall of the House of 
Representatives on Tuesday, January 23, 1996, at 9 p.m., for the 
purpose of receiving such communication as the President of the United 
States shall be pleased to make to them.

            Passed the Senate January 22, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 39

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for the ``State of the Union'' address by the President of 
                           the United States.
```