alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.1.2.1

 

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board Members

Regulus Group LLC:

 

We have examined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivable portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/_KPMG LLP

 

Philadelphia, PA

February 22, 2007
#### Carmelino Sebastian JUAN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70497

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*532Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Janice Kay Redfern, Esquire, Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carmelino Sebastian Juan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Sebastian Juan’s motion to reopen for failure to establish exceptional circumstances, where Sebastian Juan did not establish that he failed to appear at his 2013 hearing due to circumstances beyond his control. *See*8 C.F.R. § 100858(b)(4)(H); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(l) (defining exceptional circumstances as circumstances beyond the control of the alien); *cf. Valencia-Fragoso v. INS,*321 F.3d 1204, 1205-06 (9th Cir. 2003) (no exceptional circumstances where petitioner was late to her hearing ¿ue to confusion about the time).

PETITI0N P0E KEVIEW DENIED-

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOQUEST
CORPORATION'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3,1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                               131,451
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         99,347
<ALLOWANCES>                           3,283
<INVENTORY>                           73,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     316,173
<PP&E>                                88,443
<DEPRECIATION>                        26,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       634,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                121,104
<BONDS>                               82,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 515
<OTHER-SE>                           406,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         634,521
<SALES>                              311,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     311,244
<CGS>                                161,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        161,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      28,458
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         (62)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     5,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       45,492
<INCOME-TAX>                          19,107
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   26,385
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          26,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.50
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 63

  To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture 
  should dispose of all remaining commodities in the disaster reserve 
 maintained under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to relieve the distress 
of livestock producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely 
affected by the prolonged drought conditions existing in certain areas 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 1996

Mrs. Kassebaum submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture 
  should dispose of all remaining commodities in the disaster reserve 
 maintained under the Agricultural Act of 1970 to relieve the distress 
of livestock producers whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely 
affected by the prolonged drought conditions existing in certain areas 
             of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF DISASTER RESERVE FOR ASSISTANCE TO LIVESTOCK 
              PRODUCERS.

    In light of the prolonged drought conditions existing in certain 
areas of the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture should 
promptly dispose of all commodities in the disaster reserve maintained 
under section 813 of the Agricultural Act of 1970 (7 U.S.C. 1427a) to 
relieve the distress of livestock producers whose ability to maintain 
livestock is adversely affected by the prolonged drought.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OC10 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas J. Edelman, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 1, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 40

   To provide for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 24, 1995

Mr. Moynihan (for himself, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Simpson) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   To provide for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the 
Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other 
than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the 
term of Samuel Curtis Johnson of Wisconsin on December 4, 1995, is 
filled by the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania. The 
appointment is for a term of six years and shall take effect on 
December 5, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 886 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 886

To provide for the conveyance of the Radar Bomb Scoring Site, Forsyth, 
                                Montana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 6 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the conveyance of the Radar Bomb Scoring Site, Forsyth, 
                                Montana.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, RADAR BOMB SCORING SITE, FORSYTH, MONTANA.

    (a) Conveyance Required.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary 
of the Air Force shall convey, without consideration, to the City of 
Forsyth, Montana (in this section referred to as the ``City''), all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of 
property (including any improvements thereon) consisting of 
approximately ____ acres located in Forsyth, Montana, which has served 
as a support complex and recreational facilities for the Radar Bomb 
Scoring Site, Forsyth, Montana.
    (b) Condition of Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the City--
            (1) utilize the property and recreational facilities 
        conveyed under that subsection for housing and recreation 
        purposes; or
            (2) enter into an agreement with an appropriate public or 
        private entity to lease such property and facilities to that 
        entity for such purposes.
    (c) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines at any time that the 
property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being utilized in 
accordance with paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of subsection (b), all 
right, title, and interest in and to the conveyed property, including 
any improvements thereon, shall revert to the United States and the 
United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the 
property.
    (d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal 
description of the property conveyed under this section shall be 
determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of such 
survey shall be borne by the City.
    (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
under this section as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6438 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the waiver of limitations with respect to excluding from 
 gross income amounts received by wrongfully incarcerated individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER OF LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO EXCLUDING 
              FROM GROSS INCOME AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY WRONGFULLY 
              INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(d) of the Protecting Americans from 
Tax Hikes Act of 2015 is amended by striking ``1-year'' and inserting 
``2-year''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 304(d) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``application of this Act'' and inserting ``application of 
this section''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 304 of the Protecting Americans from 
Tax Hikes Act of 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the waiver of limitations with respect to excluding from 
 gross income amounts received by wrongfully incarcerated individuals.
```
Ladies and Gentlemen,

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published today in the Federal Register a notice of public meeting and availability of the preliminary support document for distribution 

transformers. The public meeting will be held April 5, 2011, at the U.S. Department of Energy Headquarters. (Please refer to the attached Federal Register Notice for details, which is 

also available at: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-4607.pdf )

To inform interested parties and facilitate the public meeting and comment process, DOE has prepared an agenda, a preliminary technical support document, and briefing materials, 

which are available at:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/distribution_transformers.html (As of today, the notice of public meeting and preliminary technical support 

document are still in preparation for public view. We anticipate going "live" within the next week.) 

In addition, you may refer to the current Code of Federal Regulations at Subpart K--Distribution Transformers, for information about what distribution transformers are covered, the 

existing efficiency levels, and current test procedures at:

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=43279bf3e3e8ba0475407df6574e2c14&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title10/10cfr431_main_02.tpl

Written comments are welcome and should be submitted to DOEby April 18, 2011.

Yours truly,

Jim Raba

James Raba

Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards

Building Technologies Program

Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

U.S. Department of Energy

Telephone: (202) 586-8654