alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,225
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,331
<PP&E>                                          25,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,486
<SALES>                                          4,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,808
<CGS>                                            4,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,482
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,791)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)
        

</TABLE>
Re: Clean version of the ozone NPR 

Thomas Gillis to: King, Heidi R. 01/06/2010 09:09 AM

Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J.", John Hannon, Karen Martin, Lydia Wegman, Susan Stone, 

Tricia Crabtree

The new version is in ROCIS.

Tom

"King, Heidi R." Good morning, The ROCIS system is open for a... 01/06/2010 08:17:50 AM

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." 

<Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John 

Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia 

Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/06/2010 08:17 AM

Subject: Re: Clean version of the ozone NPR

Good morning,

The ROCIS system is open for amendment. 

Could I ask the favor that someone let Dom or I know when the clean final docs are uploaded?

Thank you,

Heidi

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov <Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov> 

To: King, Heidi R.; Mancini, Dominic J. 

Cc: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov <Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov>; Stone.Susan@epamail.epa.gov 

<Stone.Susan@epamail.epa.gov>; hannon.john@epamail.epa.gov <hannon.john@epamail.epa.gov>; 

Gillis.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov <Gillis.Thomas@epamail.epa.gov>; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov 

<Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov> 

Sent: Tue Jan 05 21:13:56 2010

Subject: Clean version of the ozone NPR 

Heidi and Dom,

Attached please find the clean version of the ozone NPR. It includes the two sentences that we all agreed 

upon today. The first sentence begins on page 226 and the second sentence is on p. 227. Based on our 

conversation this afternoon, I hope it can be loaded into ROCIS tomorrow morning. Thanks very much 

Dom for working with us to get this package done today. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Lydia
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

d1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

140452

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140452 COA: 294560 Wayne CC: 04-012093-01-FC JERAME DURELL CROWE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 17, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
January	13,	2016

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Federal	Aviation	Administration Document	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue	SE Washington,	D.C.	20590

Re: Crop	Insurance	of	America	LLC	petition	for	Exemption

FAA	Docket	Number: FAA

- 2016

- 0156

- 001

Supplement	to	Petition	for	Exemption

Dear	Administrator:

Petitioner	Crop	Insurance	of	America	LLC	submits	this	supplement	to	the	petition for	exemption	filed	on	November	2,	2015	and	posted	January	6,	2016	under	docket

number	FAA

- 20 16

- 0156

- 0001.

In	our	petition,	Crop	Insurance	of	Am erica	LLC	sought	a	section	333	E xemption	for the	operation	of	a	DJI	Inspire1	quadcopter.		In	this	supplement,	Crop	Insurance	of America	LLC	seeks	to	add	the	same	exemption	for	two	fixed	wing	unmanned

airc raft:

Precision	Hawk	Lancaster	Mk

- III	Rev

- IV Ebee	Sensefly	for	Agriculture

The	FAA	is	familiar	with	and	has	already	determined	that	the	Precision Hawk Lancaster	Hawkeye	MK

- III and	the	Ebee	Sensefly	meet the	requirements	of	Section 333	of	the	Reform	Act	in	the	light	of	its	wei ght,	speed	and	operational	capabilities See	e.g.:,

Exemption	No.	11273	to	AIG	PC	Global	Services,	Inc.; Exemption	No.	11573	to	Ag	Tech	Enterprises,	Inc.; Exemption	No.	115 5 1	to	Ag	Worx	Inc.; Exemption	No.	11345	to	Precision	Hawk,	Inc. ; E xemption	No.	11263 to	Sensefly

Because	it	does	not	carry	flammable	fuel	and	is	lightweight,	a	grant	of	exemption	to the	precision	Hawk	Lan caster	Mk

- III	Rev

- IV	and	Ebee Sensefly	would	reduce	the hazards	and	emission	of	heavier	manned	aircraft.		The	two	fixed	wing	are	be i ng submitted	for	us	to	utilize	the	best	aircraft	based	on what	kind	of	data	and	size	of

data and	or	damaged	crop	acres	need to be collect ed.		Th ese	added	aircraft	on	the larger	da ta	and	crop	acres	will	allow	us to	reduce	the	number	of	take	off	andlandings	on	larger data	sets	and field	acres.			This will	allow us to	be safer f or	larger

data	sets for	the	public	and	Pilot	in	Command.

A	copy	of	the	flight	operation	manuals	are	attached	for	both	the	Precision	Hawk Lancaster	Hawkeye	MK

- III	Rev

- IV	and	the	Ebee	sensefly	are	attached	setting	forth the	specifications	of	its	operation.

Please	grant	an	exemption	to	Crop	Insurance	of	America LLC	for	the	Precision	Hawk

Mk

- III	Rev

- IV,	Ebee	Sensefly,	and	the	original	DJI	Inspire1.

Sincerely,

Lynn	Button ,	President Crop	Insurance	of	America	LLC.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Lowell B. Hawkinson, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/ LOWELL B. HAWKINSON                                  
|                    |  | Lowell B. Hawkinson Chief Executive Officer and
President
#### William Carl YORK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, US, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2280

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December *19,*2017

Decided: December 21, 2017

William C. York, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William C. York appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we con-fíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because York’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, York has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ LINDA M. SILUK     
| |  |                        
| |  | Linda M. Siluk         
| |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

Dated: November 12, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 31, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40987

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

TERRY A. SIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:03-CR-189-RAS-ALL

--------------------

Before GARWOOD, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terry A. Simpson appeals his sentence following his guiltyplea conviction to receipt of child pornography. He renews his

claim that the district court erred by adjusting his offense

level by four levels under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(3) because the

factual finding supporting the adjustment was made by the

district court and was not made by a jury or admitted by him,

thus violating the Fifth and Sixth Amendments under Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States v. Booker,

125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The Government concedes that Simpson’s
No. 04-40987

-2-

sentence is erroneous after Booker, that it cannot prove beyond a

reasonable doubt that the district court would have imposed the

same sentence if it knew that the guidelines were only

discretionary, and that the case should be remanded for

resentencing. Simpson’s sentence is thus vacated and the case is

remanded for resentencing. United States v. Akpan, ___ F.3d ___,

No. 03-20875, 2005 WL 852416 at *11-12 (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 2005).

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
#### PEAKER ENERGY GROUP, L.L.C.; Energy Coast Logistics Terminal, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CARGILL, INCORPORATED; Louisiana Sugar Refining, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-30031

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 13, 2017

Benjamin Dox Reichard, James Richard Swanson, Attorney, Fishman Haygood, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, Harvey Sylva-nous Bartlett, III, Gladstone Nathaniel Jones, III, Esq., Attorney, Lynn Elizabeth Swanson, Attorney, Jones, Swanson, Hud-dell & Garrison, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Aaron Daniel Van Oort, Jeffrey Just-man, Faegre Baker Daniels, L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, Thomas More Flanagan, Camille Elise Gauthier, Flanagan Partners, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee Cargill, Incorporated

Stephen Henry Kupperman, Esq., Michael Anthony Balascio, Barrasso, Usdin, Kupperman, Freeman *&*Sarver, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee Louisiana Sugar Refining, L.L.C.

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and' HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The plaintiffs sued under various state-law theories after negotiations for a lease were unsuccessful. The district’ court granted summary judgment to the defendants, concluding that the plaintiffs could not prove lost profits or lost business value with reasonable certainty. The court issued a concise but adequate “Order and Reasons,” explaining that “Plaintiffs have failed to put forth evidence sufficient to prove with reasonable certainty that Plaintiffs’ venture, but for Defendants’ allegedly wrongful conduct, would have been successful and generated profits.” The court reasoned that “the combination [of seven specified factors] pushes the speculative and uncertain nature of the success.”’ •

We have reviewed the briefs, pertinent parts of the record, and the applicable law and have heard the helpful arguments’ of counsel. The summary judgment is AF*192FIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549
                                  FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
            OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

               For the quarterly period ended December 31, 1996

                                    OR
[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
            OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                      Commission File No. 33-80987

                     Merit Behavioral Care Corporation
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                                    22-3236927
(State or other jurisdiction of                            (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification Number)

                            One Maynard Drive
                      Park Ridge, New Jersey 07656
                (Address of principal executive offices)

                               (201) 391-8700
                    (Registrant's telephone number,
                             including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                         Yes..X...    No.......

As of January 31, 1997,  28,477,800 shares of the registrant's common stock, par
value $.01 per share, which is the only class of common stock of the registrant,
were outstanding.


<PAGE>





                                                    SIGNATURES


Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

The signatory  hereby  acknowledges and adopts the typed form of his name in the
electronic filing of this document with the Securities and Exchange Commission.







Date: April 08, 1997              Merit Behavioral Care Corporation


                                  By: /s/ Arthur H. Halper
                                     ___________________________________
                                     Arthur H. Halper, Executive Vice President
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer,
                                      Accounting Officer and
                                      Duly Authorized Officer)
From: West, Dan (Mark Udall) 

Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:25:04 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 

To: Debutts, Lucy 

Cc: Edwards, Brenda; CeilingFanLightKits2012STD0045 

Subject: EERE-2012-BT-STD-0045, Ceiling Fans

Hi Lucy and Brenda,

  

Please find a letter from one of our Colorado constituents regarding ceiling fan regulation.  Would you

please add it to your docket?

  

Thank you,

  

Dan West

Legislative Correspondent | United States Senator Mark Udall of Colorado

730 Hart Senate Office Building | Washington, DC 20510 | 202-224-5941 | dan_west@markudall.senate.gov

Follow Mark Udall on his Website | Facebook | YouTube | Twitter

Sign up for Mark's Newsletter
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5



                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is made as of this 1st day
of April, 2002, by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana
corporation (the "Company"), and Brent F. Heffron (the "Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the
Employee dated as of November 1, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to eliminate certain
benefits payable to Employee upon termination of employment in consideration of
the inclusion of Employee as an initial participant in a Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the "SERP").

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of
Employee by the Company, the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company and the benefits potentially payable to Employee under
the SERP, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of April 1, 2002:

         SECTION 1. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the terms and
provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         SECTION 2. Article IV, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.

         SECTION 3. Article IV, Section 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
renumbered as Article IV, Section 5.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

                           STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.


                           By:
                              ------------------------------------------
                                    James W. McFarland
                                    Compensation Committee Chairman

                           EMPLOYEE:


                           ---------------------------------------------
                                        Brent F. Heffron
Exhibit 10.12


Consent of Independent Public Accountants

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia
Vale do Rio Doce of our report dated January 18, 2002, relating to the
Financial Statements of Companhia Nipo-Brasileira de Pelotizacao - NIBRASCO for
the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, which is included in such
Annual Report.


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, June 27, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Juniper Growth Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 14, 2008



|                                                                     |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Joseph Rozelle                                                   |  | 
|Joseph Rozelle
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |  | 





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.