Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-122-863]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large diameter welded pipe from Canada to correct ministerial errors. The period of review (POR) is August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020.
 DATES: Applicable March 11, 2022.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background On January 31, 2022, Commerce disclosed its calculations for the 
                    *Final Results*
                     [1]
                    
                     to interested parties and provided interested parties with the opportunity to allege ministerial errors.[2]
                    
                     On February 7, 2022, Evraz Inc. NA (Evraz), the sole mandatory respondent, submitted an allegation of ministerial errors in the 
                    *Final Results.*[3]
                    
                     No other party made an allegation of ministerial errors. On February 11, 2022, the American Line Pipe Producers Association (ALPPA), a domestic interested party, rebutted Evraz's ministerial error allegation.[4] Legal Framework Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), defines a “ministerial error” as including “errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.” With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce “will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review . . .” Ministerial Error We agree with Evraz that Commerce made a ministerial error in the 
                    *Final Results*
                     within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f). In the 
                    *Final Results,*
                     we intended to offset Evraz's reported section 232 duty expense by the reported section 232 duty revenue capped at the amount of the expense and to deduct the net amount from the export price as a movement expense.[5]
                    
                     However, in calculating the offset, we unintentionally used an erroneous capping formula. Accordingly, Commerce determines that it made a ministerial error in the 
                    *Final Results*
                     pursuant to section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) and has amended its calculations to apply the intended capping formula. For a complete discussion of the ministerial error allegation, as well as Commerce's analysis, 
                    *see*
                     the accompanying Ministerial Error Memorandum.[6]
                    
                     The Ministerial Error Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *https://access.trade.gov.* Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the 
                    *Final Results*
                     to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin 
                    ( print page 13965)
                    assigned to Evraz in the 
                    *Final Results,*
                     which changes from 15.29 percent to 7.90 percent. Furthermore, we are also revising the review-specific weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the non-examined companies under review, which is equal to Evraz's weighted-average dumping margin, consistent with the 
                    *Final Results.* Amended Final Results As a result of correcting the ministerial error, Commerce determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 27, 2018, through April 30, 2020: Exporter or producer
Weighted-
                             average  
                             dumping  
                             margin  
                             (percent)Evraz Inc. NA 7
7.90Non-Examined Companies 8
7.90
 Disclosure We intend to disclose under administrative protective order the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after publication of these amended final results in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    *,*
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final results of review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the amended final results of this review in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    *,*
                     in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we calculated importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce's “automatic assessment” practice will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Evraz for which the company did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (
                    *e.g.,*
                     a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[9] For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we intend to direct CBP to assess antidumping duties at a rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for those companies in the amended final results. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin that is established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies not subject to this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of the proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 12.32 percent 
                    *ad valorem,*
                     the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.[10] These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: March 4, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix Review-Specific Rate Applicable to Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 1. Acier Profile SBB Inc 2. Aciers Lague Steels Inc 3. Amdor Inc 4. BPC Services Group 5. Bri-Steel Manufacturing 6. Canada Culvert 7. Cappco Tubular Products Canada Inc 8. CFI Metal Inc 9. Dominion Pipe & Piling 10. Enduro Canada Pipeline Services 11. Fi Oilfield Services Canada 12. Forterra 13. Gchem Ltd 14. Graham Construction 15. Groupe Fordia Inc 16. Grupo Fordia Inc 17. Hodgson Custom Rolling 18. Hyprescon Inc 19. Interpipe Inc 20. K K Recycling Services 21. Kobelt Manufacturing Co
                        ( print page 13966) 22. Labrie Environment 23. Les Aciers Sofatec 24. Lorenz Conveying P 25. Lorenz Conveying Products 26. Matrix Manufacturing 27. MBI Produits De Forge 28. Nor Arc 29. Peak Drilling Ltd 30. Pipe & Piling Sply Ltd 31. Pipe & Piling Supplies 32. Prudental 33. Prudential 34. Shaw Pipe Protecction 35. Shaw Pipe Protection 36. Tenaris Algoma Tubes Facility 37. Tenaris Prudential 38. Welded Tube of Can Ltd


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2020,*87 FR 6497 (February 4, 2022) (
                        *Final Results*), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Deadline for Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results,” dated February 1, 2022. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Evraz's Letter, “Ministerial Error Comments,” dated February 7, 2022. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         ALPPA Letter, “Response to Evraz's Ministerial Error Allegation,” dated February 11, 2022. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results*
                         IDM at Comment 6. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada; 2018-2020: Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final Results,” dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial Error Memorandum). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         In the underlying less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, Commerce determined that Evraz Inc. NA, Evraz Inc. NA Canada, and the Canadian National Steel Corporation (collectively, Evraz) comprise a single entity. 
                        *See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Canada: Antidumping Duty Order*, 84 FR 18775 (May 2, 2019) (
                        *Order*). There is no information on this record of this review that requires reconsideration of this single entity determination. 8.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Appendix. Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         For a full discussion of this practice, 
                        *see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,*68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See Order.* Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2022-05208 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P