alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1180 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1180

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1180/2003 of 2 July 2003 establishing specific measures for import licences covering sugar from Serbia and Montenegro **

*
Official Journal L 165 , 03/07/2003 P. 0016 - 0016 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1180/2003

of 2 July 2003

establishing specific measures for import licences covering sugar from Serbia and Montenegro

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector(1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 680/2002(2), and in particular Article 22(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 764/2003 of 30 April 2003 suspending for a period of three months, with regard to sugar of CN codes 1701 and 1702 imported from Serbia and Montenegro, the arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2000 introducing exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process(3), was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 1 May 2003 and came into force on 8 May 2003.

(2) Regulation (EC) No 764/2003 suspends the preferential treatment of sugar imported from Serbia and Montenegro as from 8 May 2003. Suitable measures should be adopted to enable holders of import licences to recover their security where they no longer wish to avail themselves of a certificate on the terms pertaining as from 8 May 2003.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Holders of import licences issued under Article 7(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1464/95(4) and valid after 7 May 2003 may request that such licences be cancelled. In such cases, the security referred to in Article 8(1)(d) of that Regulation shall be released without delay.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 July 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 104, 20.4.2002, p. 26.

(3) OJ L 109, 1.5.2003, p. 13.

(4) OJ L 144, 28.6.1995, p. 14, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 995/2002 (OJ L 152, 12.6.2002, p. 11).
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 8/12/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

vs.

BRANDON C. ALLEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-3006

(D.C. No. 92-CR-40004)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

Defendant Brandon C. Allen pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute

approximately 180 grams of crack cocaine and was sentenced to 120 months. Defendant

moved to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which the district court denied. 
- 2 -

We have jurisdicition under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm for substantially the same

reasons given by the district court, 1 R. doc. 75. 

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1701 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1701

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1701/2003 of 24 September 2003 adapting Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 243 , 27/09/2003 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1701/2003

of 24 September 2003

adapting Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency(1), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 requires products, parts and appliances to comply with the environmental protection requirements of Annex 16 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (hereinafter Chicago Convention) as issued in November 1999, except for its Appendices.

(2) The Chicago Convention and its annexes have been amended since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 requiring adaptation of Article 6(1) thereof in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 54(3) of the same Regulation.

(3) The measures provided for in the present Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Aviation Safety Agency Committee established by Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:

"1. Products, parts and appliances shall comply with the environmental protection requirements contained in Annex 16 to the Chicago Convention as issued in March 2002 for Volume I and November 1999 for Volume II, except for the Appendices to Annex 16."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 September 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2003.

For the Commission

Loyola De Palacio

Vice-President

(1) OJ L 240, 7.9.2002, p. 1.
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-21
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-21


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.



/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 630 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 

rules regarding basis adjustments to stock of S corporations making 

charitable contributions of property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2015 

Mr. REICHERT (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent certain rules regarding basis adjustments to 

stock of S corporations making charitable contributions 

of property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 630 IH

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RULE REGARDING BASIS ADJUST2 MENT TO STOCK OF S CORPORATIONS MAK3 ING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF PROP4 ERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1367(a)(2) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the last sen7 tence. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to contributions made in taxable 

10 years beginning after December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Trent B. Troyer
------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2003
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Loreto Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric E. Marin, Interim Chief Financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Eric E.
      MarinName:
              Eric
      E. MarinTitle:
              Interim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
              April
      14, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean D. BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6857

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Sean D. Black, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Stephen Wiley Miller, Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*262Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean D. Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability -will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Black has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kedrick Deshawn CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-1088

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

Sally Berens, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Paul L. Nelson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Pedro Celis, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI, for Defendant-Appellant

BEFORE: CLAY, COOK, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kednck CJark pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 921(a), and 924(a)(2). PSR at 3, At sentencing, Clark objected to the PSR’s base offense-level calculation on the ground that his prior conviction under Michigan’s felonious assault statute, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 750.82, was not a conviction of a “crime of violence” under USSG § 4B1.2(a)(1). PID 235/Sentencing Hr’g. Clark also objected to the PSR’s adding a criminal-history point for a marijuana-related civil infraction under Grand Rapids City Char*584ter, tit. XVIII, § 292. PID 235, 237-39. The Government agreed with Clark that his admission of responsibility for a civil infraction is not a “prior sentence imposed upon an adjudication of guilt by guilty plea, trial, or plea of nolo contendere” as required by USSG § 4A1.2(a)(1) and should not be scored a criminal-history point. PID 241-44. The district court overruled Clark’s objections and imposed a bottom-of-the-guidelines 57-month sentence. The court stated that had it not scored the point, the Guidelines range and sentence would have been different. PID 254. We AFFIRM the district court’s base offense-level calculation, VACATE the district court’s criminal-history scoring, and REMAND for resentencing.

Clark acknowledges that *United States v. Harris,*853 F.3d 318, 321 (6th Cir. 2017), decided during the pendency of this appeal, held that Michigan felonious assault, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.82,1 has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against another, and thus constitutes a crime of violence. Applying *Harris,*we affirm the district court’s base-offense-level scoring of 20 under USSG §§ 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) and 4B1.2(a)(1).

The Government concedes error in the district court’s scoring a criminal history point for the civil infraction. Given the district court’s candid acknowledgment that the scoring affected the sentence, re-sentencing is required.

We therefore affirm the district court’s base offense-level calculation under *Harris,*853 F.3d at 321, vacate the scoring of Clark’s criminal-history category, and remand for Clark to be resentenced without scoring an additional criminal-history point for the civil infraction.

1

. Under Michigan law, "a person who assaults another person with a gun, revolver, pistol, knife, iron bar, club, brass knuckles, or other dangerous weapon without intending to commit murder or to inflict great bodily harm less than murder is guilty of a felony ...” Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 750.82.
S. Con. Res. 60 Agreed to May 23, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, May 23, 1996, Friday, May 24, 1996,

or Saturday, May 25, 1996, pursuant to a motion made by the

Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with this resolution,

it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, June 3,

1996, or Tuesday, June 4, 1996, or until such time on that day

as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in

the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day

after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2

of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when

the House of Representatives adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, May 23, 1996, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on

Wednesday, May 29, 1996, or until noon on the second day after

Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and the House, respectively,
S. Con. Res. 60—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 34

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 21, 1995

Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of ‘‘Vice Presidents of the United

States, 1789–1993’’.

Whereas the United States Constitution provides that the

Vice President of the United States shall serve as President of the Senate; and

Whereas the careers of the 44 Americans who held that post

during the years 1789 through 1993 richly illustrate the

development of the nation and its government; and

Whereas the vice presidency, traditionally the least understood and most often ignored constitutional office in the

Federal Government, deserves wider attention: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),
2

SCON 34 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF THE ‘‘VICE PRESIDENTS OF THE

2 UNITED STATES, 1789–1993’’.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be printed as a Senate

4 document the book entitled ‘‘Vice Presidents of the United

5 States, 1789–1993’’, prepared by the Senate Historical

6 Office under the supervision of the Secretary of the Sen7 ate.

8 (b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Senate document de9 scribed in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and

10 shall be in the style, form, manner, and binding as di11 rected by the Joint Committee on Printing after consulta12 tion with the Secretary of the Senate.

13 (c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

14 number of copies, there shall be printed with suitable bind15 ing the lesser of—

16 (1) 1,000 copies (750 paper bound and 250

17 case bound) for the use of the Senate, to be allo18 cated as determined by the Secretary of the Senate;

19 or

20 (2) a number of copies that does not have a

21 total production and printing cost of more than

22 $11,100.

Passed the Senate December 20, 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON

Secretary.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 29 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 29

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 1995

              Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for marking the celebration of Jerusalem on the occasion of 
                         its 3,000 anniversary

Whereas the Senate wishes to mark the 3,000th anniversary of King David's 
        establishment of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel;
Whereas Jerusalem, the City of David, has been the focal point of Jewish life;
Whereas Jerusalem, the City of Peace, has held a unique place and exerted a 
        unique influence on the moral development of Western Civilization; and
Whereas no other city on Earth is today the capital of the same country, 
        inhabited by the same people, speaking the same language, and 
        worshipping the same God as it was 3,000 years ago: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Architect is directed to make the necessary arrangements for a 
date in October to be mutually agreed upon by the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Majority Leader of the Senate, after 
consultation with the Minority Leaders of the two houses, for the use 
of the Rotunda for a celebration of the founding of the city of 
Jerusalem.

            Passed the Senate September 29 (legislative day, September 
      25), 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```