alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13038-13039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04863]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11672]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Storage and Exhibition--Determinations: ``Cartier and 
Islamic Art: In Search of Modernity'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby

[[Page 13039]]

determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to 
agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary 
storage and display in the exhibition ``Cartier and Islamic Art: In 
Search of Modernity'' at the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, Texas, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are 
of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary storage 
and exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned 
are in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of 
these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfccdadccbd6d0d18d8b8a86ffcccbdecbda91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="47342224332e28297573727e07343326332269202831">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-04863 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporaed in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         163,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    430,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               841,212
<PP&E>                                       3,355,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,552,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          374,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,427
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,646,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,552,292
<SALES>                                         11,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,393
<CGS>                                            6,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               842,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (15,050)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (839,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (839,356)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 645 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to provide 

career education pathways in manufacturing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2015 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to provide career education pathways in manufacturing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Manufac5 turing Jobs for Students Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CAREER EDUCATION PATHWAYS. 

7 Section 5421 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu8 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7245) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 645 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub2 paragraph (B); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(D) significantly engage students, in a co7 ordinated effort with local manufacturing em8 ployers, teachers, students, and parents, to pro9 mote careers in the manufacturing field.’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (c)(2)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub12 paragraph (K); 

13 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

14 subparagraph (L) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(M) provide students in grades 7 through 

17 12 with— 

18 ‘‘(i) information on career and edu19 cational pathways leading to jobs and ca20 reer opportunities in the labor markets of 

21 the geographic area of the local edu22 cational agency of the school, particularly 

23 in the manufacturing field; and 

24 ‘‘(ii) opportunities for interaction with 

25 employers of such labor markets, with 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 645 IH

1 preference given to employers in the manu2 facturing field, including opportunities to 

3 visit the workplaces of such employers to 

4 facilitate a greater understanding of the 

5 job requirements, job opportunities, and 

6 what the job entails.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Alejandro MUNIZ-OROSCO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70937

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Sung Uk Park, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Sung U. Park, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

*659Michele Yvette Frances Sarko, Esquire, Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alejandro Muniz-Orosco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal and denying a motion to continue. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Muniz-Orosco’s unexhausted contention that his conviction under Cal. Penal Code § 273.5 is not a domestic violence conviction. *See Tijani v. Holder,*628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceeding before the [agency].”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 31

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to grant

Congress and the States the power to prohibit the physical desecration

of the flag of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 21 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. HEFLIN, Mr. DOLE, Mr. THURMOND, Mr.

GRASSLEY, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. KYL, Mr. EXON, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. FORD,

Mr. LOTT, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BOND, Mr. BREAUX, Mr.

CAMPBELL, Mr. COATS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. COHEN, Mr. COVERDELL,

Mr. D’AMATO, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. GRAMM, Mr.

GRAMS, Mr. GREGG, Mr. HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr.

INHOFE, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MACK,

Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. PRESSLER, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr.

ROTH, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to grant Congress and the States the power to

prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

States.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the follow-
2

•SJ 31 IS

1 ing article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitu2 tion of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents

3 and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by

4 the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States with5 in seven years from the date of its submission by the

6 Congress:

7 ‘‘ARTICLE—

8 ‘‘The Congress and the States shall have power to

9 prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United

10 States.’’.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Demoia Omar DAVIS, a/k/a Moe, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-4496

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 20, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Leslie Carter Rawls, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Anthony J. Enright, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Demoia Omar Davis appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to 11 months’ imprisonment followed by 2 years’ supervised release. We affirm.

“A district court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence upon revocation of supervised release.” *United States v. Webb,*738 F.3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013). ‘We will affirm a revocation sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not plainly unreasonable.” *United States v. Slappy,*872 F.3d 202, 207 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks omitted). “When reviewing whether a revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable, we must first determine whether it is unreasonable at all.” *United States v. Thompson,*595 F.3d 544, 546 (4th Cir. 2010). A revocation sentence is procedurally reasonable if the district court adequately explains the sentence after considering the Sentencing Guidelines’ Chapter Seven policy statements and the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (2012); *Thompson,*595 F.3d at 546-47. A “court need not be as detailed or specific when imposing a revocation sentence as it must be when imposing a post-conviction sentence, [but] it still must provide a statement of reasons for the sentence imposed.” *Slappy,*872 F.3d at 208 (internal quotation marks omitted).

*146Davis claims that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately explain the reasons for imposing the revocation sentence. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court’s explanation, although brief, was sufficient.

Accordingly, we reject Davis’ challenge to the procedural reasonableness of his revocation sentence and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Monday, September 24, 2012

9:00 am

– 12:00 pm ET, Room 8E

- 089

Purpose

The Department will present its methodology for conducting the energy conservation

standards rulemaking for commercial clothes washers . The Department also will seek

input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agen da

9 :00

- 9 :15 a m Welcome, O pening Remarks, and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman

9 :15

- 9 :20 a m Rulemaking Introduction

Stephen Witkowski

9 :20

- 9:45 am Regulatory History, Test Procedure Issues, Rulemaking

Process Overview

Timothy Sutherland

9:45

- 10:20 am Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, and

Engineering Analysis

Timothy Sutherland

10 :20

- 10 :30 a m Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Ben Barrington

10:30

- 10:45 am Break

10: 45

- 11 :45 a m Markups Analysis, Energy and Water Use Analysis, Li fe

- Cycle

Cost and Payback Period Analysis, Shipments Analysis,

National Impact Analysis, Consumer Subgroup Analysis,

Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Emissions Analysis, and Regulatory Impact Analysis

Maithili Iyer

11: 45

- 12 : 00 p m Other Issues and Comments, Closing Remarks

Stephen Witkowski

12 : 00 p m Adjourn
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

Friday, May 12, 2023

Mr. Robert Vartabedian

Alston & Bird LLP

301 Commerce St Ste 3635

Fort Worth, TX 76102-4143

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. William Scott Hastings

Locke Lord LLP

2200 Ross Avenue

Suite 2200

Dallas, TX 75201-6776

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Ryan D. Clinton

Davis Gerald & Cremer, P.C.

300 West 6th St., Suite 1830

Austin, TX 78701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. David E. Keltner

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP

201 Main Street, Suite 2500

Fort Worth, TX 76102

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 21-0509

Court of Appeals Number: 05-19-00291-CV

Trial Court Number: 366-01160-2018

Style: FINLEY RESOURCES, INC., FINLEY PRODUCTION CO., L.P. AND PETRO 

CANYON ENERGY, LLC

v.

HEADINGTON ROYALTY, INC. AND HEADINGTON ENERGY PARTNERS, LLC

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued an opinion(s) and judgment in the abovereferenced cause. You may obtain a copy of the opinion(s) and judgment through Case Search 

on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/supreme.aspx. On the Case Search page 

simply enter the case number and push the Search button to find the docket page for your case.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Post Office Box 12248

Austin, Texas 78711

(512) 463-1312

cc: Mr. Rubin Morin (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Nicholas Davis (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Thomas F. Loose (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Richard M. Abernathy (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

District Clerk Collin County (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Thomas M. Melsheimer (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Conrad Hester (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. John Randolph Thompson III (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Connor Bourland (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

FILE COPY
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of IndyMac ABS, Inc. (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 22, 2007


/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of**

**the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James A. Courter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 17, 2009 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDTCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.4


                           Service Agreement Amendment
                           ---------------------------

         Agreement effective January 1, 2002, by and between Penn Independent
Corporation, 420 S. York Road, Hatboro, Pennsylvania, 19040 ("PIC") and
Penn-America Group, Inc., 420 S. York Road, Hatboro, Pennsylvania, 19040
("PAGI").

         WHEREAS, the parties hereto are parties to a Service Agreement dated
August 20, 1993, as most recently amended effective January 1, 2001 (the
"Service Agreement"); and,

         WHEREAS, the Service Agreement provides for the payment by PAGI to PIC
of a monthly expense estimate, which estimate consists of PAGI's share of the
telephone, insurance, building rental, facilities management expenses and
salaries of Irvin Saltzman, Human Resources and Office Services personnel in
connection with their services for PAGI; and,

         WHEREAS, the parties to this Amended Service Agreement desire to
establish the amount of the monthly expense estimate owed by PAGI to PIC
effective January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties,
intending to be legally bound, agree that effective January 1, 2002 through
December 31, 2002, PAGI will pay to PIC $19,167.00 as a monthly expense
estimate, which estimate constitutes PAGI's share of monthly expenses for the
telephone, insurance, building rental, facilities management expenses and
salaries of Irvin Saltzman, Human Resources, and Office Services personnel.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Agreement as of
the date first above written.

PENN INDEPENDENT CORPORATION                PENN-AMERICA GROUP, INC.



BY: /s/ Jason M. Waksman                    BY: /s/ Joseph F. Morris
    ----------------------------                ----------------------------
    Jason M. Waksman                            Joseph F. Morris
|   | 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of A5 Laboratories Inc. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 5, 2011 | /s/ Richard Azani            |   |
|-------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|              | Richard Azani                |   |
|              | Principal Accounting Officer |   |

----