alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS FO R TH E N I N TH C I R C U I T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME RI CA , P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. CE S AR MAS CO RR O , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50554 D . C . N o. 3: 10 -c r- 00 41 0-JA H -1 ME MORA ND UM *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d J anua ry10, 2012

P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : KOZ I NS KI , C h ie f Ju d g e , RE I NH AR DT a nd W . FLETC H ER , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 1. M a s c orr o’ s ow n a dm i s s i on of hi s pr i orba d a c tpr ovi de s s uf f i c i e ntpr oof unde rH uddl e s t on v. U ni t e d S t a t e s , 485 U . S . 681, 690 ( 1988) , f ora dm i s s i on of

the pr i orba d a c ti nt o e vi de nc e . A dm i tt i ng the e vi de nc e di dn’ tvi ol a t e F e de r a l R ul e of E vi de nc e 404( b) be c aus e the pr i orba d a c ti ndi c a t e d both M a s c orr o’ s know l e dge 

# FI LED FEB 02 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSpage 2

th a t h is p a s s e n g e r s w e r e in th e U n ite dS ta te s u n law f u llya n dh is p u rp o s e to h e lp the m r e m a i n. S e e U ni t e d S t a t e s v. L ongor i a , 624 F . 2d 66, 69 ( 9th C i r . 1980) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi dn’ tabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n f i ndi ng tha tthe pr e

j udi c i a l e f

f e c tof adm i tt i ng the pri or bad actdi dn ’ tsubst ant i al l y outw ei gh i t s probat i ve val ue. S ee U ni t ed S t at es v. R am i re z- Ji m i nez, 96 7 F . 2d 13 21 , 13 27 (9th C i r. 19 92 ). 2. T h e g r an dju ryin s tru c tio n s M a s c o rr o c h a lle n g e s a r e in d is tin g u is h ab le fr om tho se w e’ ve previ ou sl y hel d n ott o b e c on st i tut i on al l y def ec t i ve. S ee U ni t ed S t at es v. C arut o, 66 3 F . 3d 39 4, 39 8– 99 (9th C i r. 20 11 ); U ni t ed S t at es v. C ort ez R i v era, 4 5 4 F . 3 d1 0 3 8 , 1 0 4 0

– 4 1 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ); U n i t edS t at es v . N av arro -V arg as, 40 8 F . 3d 11 84 , 11 87 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
#### Mohamed Sorie KANU, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-1599

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 20, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jessica A. Dawgert, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED *129STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohamed Sorie Kanu, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its decision upholding the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of Kanu’s application for special rule cancellation of removal as a battered spouse pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2) (2012). For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the petition for review.

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)© (2012), entitled “Denials of discretionary relief,” “no court shall have jurisdiction to review any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section .., 1229b,” which is the section governing cancellation of removal. In this case, the IJ found, and the Board agreed, that Kanu failed to show that he was subjected to battery or extreme cruelty. Because this determination is discretionary in nature, we lack jurisdiction to review challenges to this finding absent a colorable constitutional claim or question of law. *See Bedoya-Melendez v. United States Att’y Gen.,*680 F.3d 1321, 1328 (11th Cir. 2012) (finding no jurisdiction to consider discretionary “battered or subjected to extreme cruelty” requirement for cancellation of removal under the Violence Against Women Act); *Sorda v. Holder,*643 F.3d 117, 124-25 (4th Cir. 2011) (finding no jurisdiction, to review discretionary denial of cancellation of removal absent constitutional claims or questions of law); *Obioha v. Gonzales,*431 F.3d 400, 405 (4th Cir. 2005) (“It is quite clear that the gatekeeper provision bars our jurisdiction to review a decision of the B[oard] to actually deny a petition for cancellation of removal or the other enumerated forms of discretionary relief.”).

Upon review of Kanu’s claims, we find that he has not raised any colorable constitutional issues or questions of law under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012). *See Gomis v. Holder,*571 F.3d 353, 358 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[Ajbsent a *colorable*constitutional claim or question of law, our review of the issue is not authorized by § 1252(a)(2)(D).” (emphasis added)). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jursidiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED*
EX-35 (e)
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

GSAA 2006-19

I, Michael De Francesco, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
Inc. (the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.


Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.

Date: February 28, 2007


/s/ Michael De Francesco
Michael De Francesco
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
#### Leon STAMBLER, Appellant v. MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellee

2017-1272

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.’

November 13, 2017

Brent N. Bumgardner, Nelson Bum-gardner PC, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by Thomas Cecil; Robert Greenspoon, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL.

Eliot Damon Williams, Baker Botts, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Robert C. Schein-feld, Christopher Patrick, New York, NY.

*986(Dyk, Bryson, and Reyna, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause haying been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
S. Con. Res. 33 Agreed to November 28, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas at its inception, the Capitol of the United States of America

was blessed to rise under the hand of some of this Nation’s

greatest architects, including Dr. William Thornton, Benjamin

Henry Latrobe, and Charles Bullfinch; Whereas prior to the Honorable George Malcolm White, FAIA, being appointed by President Nixon on January 27, 1971, it

had been 106 years since a professional architect had been named

to the post of Architect of the Capitol;

Whereas Mr. White has served the Congress through an unprece- dented period of growth and modernization, using to advantage

his professional accreditation in architecture, engineering, law,

and business;

Whereas Mr. White has prepared the Capitol Complex for the

next century by developing the ‘‘Master Plan for the Future

Development of the Capitol Grounds and Related Areas’’;

Whereas Mr. White has added new buildings to the Capitol grounds

as authorized by Congress, including the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, the Philip A. Hart Senate Office Building,

and the Library of Congress James Madison Memorial Building,

and through acquisition and renovation, the Thomas P. O’Neill

and Gerald R. Ford House Office Buildings, the Webster Hall

Senate Page Dormitory, and the Capitol Police Headquarters

Building;

Whereas Mr. White has preserved for future generations the existing historic fabric of the Capitol Complex by faithfully restoring

the Old Senate Chamber, the Old Supreme Court Chamber,

National Statuary Hall, the Brumidi corridors, the Rotunda canopy and frieze, the West Central Front and Terraces of the

Capitol, the House Monumental Stairs, the Library of Congress

Thomas Jefferson and John Adams Buildings, and the Statue

of Freedom atop the Capitol Dome;

Whereas Mr. White has greatly contributed to the preservation

and enhancement of the design of the District of Columbia

through his place on the District of Columbia Zoning Commission,

the Commission of Fine Arts, the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation, and other civic organizations and commissions;

and

Whereas upon Mr. White’s retirement on November 21, 1995, he

leaves a legacy of tremendous accomplishment, having made the

Capitol his life’s work and brought to this century the erudition

and polymath’s capacity of our first Architects: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the thanks and good wishes of the American people
S. Con. Res. 33—2

are hereby tendered to the Honorable George M. White, FAIA,

on the occasion of his retirement from the Office of the Architect

of the Capitol after nearly a quarter-century of outstanding service

to this Nation.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0637 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WALTER JASON PURKHISER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 26 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 20 2024

05/20/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0637
Rel: July 12, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2023-0748 Gary Noland and Nue Cheer Franklin v. Montgomery Real Estate Buyers, LLC, and Joseph Back (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-900565). BRYAN, Justice. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.
#### Richard M. FLEMING, Appellant v. IOWA BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and Board Members, et al., Appellees

No. 17-7103

September Term, 2017

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: November 22, 2017

Rehearing En Banc Denied January 9, 2018

Richard M. Fleming, Pro Se

BEFORE: Henderson, Kavanaugh, and Millett, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and on appellant’s brief and response to the court’s order to show cause. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court, entered June 21, 2017, dismissing appellant’s complaint, be affirmed. This court “may affirm the district court on any ground supported by the record.” Chambers v. Burwell, 824 F.3d 141, 143 (D.C. Cir. 2016). Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the district court could have exercised, personal jurisdiction over any of the defendants. Pursuant to D.C. Code § 13-423(a), the district court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant when a claim arises from the defendant’s “transacting any business in the District of Columbia,” “causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission in the District of Columbia,” or “causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission outside the District of Columbia if he regularly does or solicits business, engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed, or services rendered, in the District of Columbia.” Appellant has not demonstrated that any of the defendants in this case meet any of those conditions.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after *8resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
# Official Journal C 238/28 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 238 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4828 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 238

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4828 September 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 238/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 238/2 | Imposition by Finland of a public service obligation relating to the scheduled air service on the Helsinki — Mikkeli — Savonlinna route (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 238/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3964 — Berkshire Hathaway/MEHC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 238/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 238/2

Imposition by Finland of a public service obligation relating to the scheduled air service on the Helsinki — Mikkeli — Savonlinna route (1)

2

2005/C 238/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3964 — Berkshire Hathaway/MEHC) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | European Food Safety Authority |
| 2005/C 238/4 | Call for scientific data related to legally used growth promoting hormones in bovines (EFSA-Q-2005-048) — Deadline for submissions: 4 November 2005 | 5 |

III   Notices

European Food Safety Authority

2005/C 238/4

Call for scientific data related to legally used growth promoting hormones in bovines (EFSA-Q-2005-048) — Deadline for submissions: 4 November 2005

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Krall, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PURE Bioscience;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures; and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
          of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
          such evaluation;

     c)   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: December 15, 2003

Michael L. Krall
----------------
Michael L. Krall ,   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
month and six month  periods  ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")  by  SmartServ
Online, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                                  /S/  SEBASTIAN E. CASSETTA
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Sebastian E. Cassetta
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  Dated: August 26, 2003



                                                  /S/  THOMAS W. HALLER
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  Thomas W. Haller
                                                  Sr. Vice President,
                                                  Chief Financial  Officer
                                                  & Treasurer Dated:
                                                  August 26, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to SmartServ  Online,  Inc.  and will be retained by SmartServ  Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
EX-4.19



 Exhibit 4.19 

 

			
	  
 Enterprise Entity

 
 Business License

 
 Registration Number: 310000400610942 (SAIC)

 
 Incorporation Date: December 11, 2009

 
 Registration Authority: Shanghai Administration for Industry &
Commerce
  
 (Seal
Affixed)                
  
 Issuance Date: April 10, 2012
	  	 Company Name: Ad-Icon Advertising (Shanghai) Company Limited

 
 Domicile: Room 706, 200 Huiyuan Road, Jiading District, Shanghai

 
 Legal Representative: Zhen Wang

 
 Registered Capital: USD 2,900,000

 
 Contributed Capital: USD 1,000,000

 
 Corporation Type: Limited Liability Company (invested by Taiwan, Hong Kong or
Macau Company)
  
 Business Scope: permitted to design, make and
publish advertisement and act as an agent for advertisement business; provide consulting service for investment and marketing plan; conduct advertisement image design; provide consulting service for enterprise management and conference service
(except exhibition). (operation license is required in case specifically otherwise provided by laws)
  
 Sole Shareholder: Ad-Icon Company Limited
  
 Operation Period: December 11, 2009 – December 10, 2039
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6234 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6234

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for the 
   sale of any Purple Heart awarded to a member of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2016

   Mr. Cook introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide for penalties for the 
   sale of any Purple Heart awarded to a member of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Private Corrado Piccoli Purple Heart 
Preservation Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Purple Heart medal solemnly recognizes the great 
        and sometimes ultimate sacrifice of American servicemembers 
        like Private Corrado Piccoli.
            (2) The Purple Heart medal holds a place of honor as the 
        national symbol of this sacrifice and deserves special 
        protections.

SEC. 3. PENALTY FOR SALE OF PURPLE HEARTS AWARDED TO MEMBERS OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES.

    Subsection (a) of section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--
            ``(1) Penalty.--Whoever knowingly purchases, attempts to 
        purchase, solicits for purchase, mails, ships, imports, 
        exports, produces blank certificates of receipt for, 
        manufactures, sells, attempts to sell, advertises for sale, 
        trades, barters, or exchanges for anything of value any 
        decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces 
        of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges 
        awarded to the members of such forces, or the ribbon, button, 
        or rosette of any such badge, decoration or medal, or any 
        colorable imitation thereof, except when authorized under 
        regulations made pursuant to law, shall be fined under this 
        title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
            ``(2) Limitation on regulations.--Regulations referred to 
        in paragraph (1) may not authorize the sale of any Purple Heart 
        awarded to a member of the Armed Forces or former member of the 
        Armed Forces by the Secretary of the military department 
        concerned.''.
                                 <all>
```