alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 29

Providing for marking the celebration of Jerusalem on the occasion of its

3000th Anniversary.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 25), 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for marking the celebration of Jerusalem on the

occasion of its 3000th Anniversary.

Whereas the Senate wishes to mark the 3000th anniversary

of King David’s establishment of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel;

Whereas Jerusalem, the City of David, has been the focal

point of Jewish life;

Whereas Jerusalem, the City of Peace, has held a unique

place and exerted a unique influence on the moral development of Western Civilization; and

Whereas no other city on Earth is today the capital of the

same country, inhabited by the same people, speaking the

same language, and worshipping the same God as it was

3000 years ago: Now, therefore, be it
2

SCON 29 ATS

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), The architect is directed to make the nec3 essary arrangements for a date in October to be mutually

4 agreed upon by the Speaker of the House and the majority

5 leader of the Senate, after consultation with the minority

6 leaders of the two Houses, for the use of the Rotunda for

7 a celebration of the founding of the city of Jerusalem.

Æ
[4910-13-PI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Fede.-al Aviation Administration 14 eFR Part 39



# o ACTION: Final rule.
above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (Me SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products I' ••••.•.•• <.=fC,H.rul\( (DOT). AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration 

## OfAA), Department ofTransportation 100 &440) Airplanes R1N 212o-AA64 Ainvortbioess Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B 19 (Regional Jet Seri ~$Y"lIO\. [Docket No. FAA-2010-0482;,Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-225-AD; Amendm nt 

### 1-\••••-11

## '1 

## l(Ptfll 17-11 '" ~ "0", 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**] LBr./J:-"-..- 

# ~i{I/b lD

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsa condition on an aviation product. The MeAl dtsCribeS the unsafe condition as: There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures causing severe degradation ofthe stick p~her function. This directive ~s

### issuoo to revise the first flight ofthe day check ofthe stall protection system to detect degradation ofthe stick pusher function. It also introduces anew repetitive maintenance task to limit exposure to dormant failure of the stick pusher capstan shaft. "oH Dormant loss or severe degradation ofthe sticKpusher function could result in reduc controllability ofthe airplane. We are issuing!fis AD to require actions to correct th em unsafe condition on these products. 

# I DATES: This AD becomes effective [INSER~ DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF
FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAl FILECOPY t.u.s. GOVERNMENT Pf'IINTlNGOFfICI:.: 1995
- 769-211
[LETTERHEAD OF WATTS, GRIFFIS AND MCOUAT LIMITED]

EXHIBIT 23.5

March 30, 2007

LETTER OF CONSENT

Lundin Mining Corporation

I, G. Ross MacFarlane, refer to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Lundin Mining Corporation dated April 2, 2007 (including all exhibits, the "Annual Report").

I hereby consent to the use of the Watts, Griffis and McOuat Limited report titled A Technical Review of the Galmoy Mine and Prospecting Licences Held by Arcon in the Irish Midlands-Republic of Ireland for Lundin Mining Corporation, dated April 22, 2005, and the report title A Technical Review of the Zinkgruvan mine in South-Central Sweden for South Atlantic Ventures dated March 13, 2004, of which I am an author, and the appearance of my name in the Annual Report.

Yours very truly,

/s/  G. Ross MacFarlane



Per:

G. Ross MacFarlane, B. Eng., P. Eng

MK/ls

Dated:  March 30, 2007

---
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                        |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 3, 2010 

p1124 

Order 

 

December 3, 2010 

141571 

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141571 

 COA: 275584 

Wayne CC: 06-601127-NF 

RUFUS YOUNG, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

NICOLE WILLIAMS and LINDA LEE, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 3, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. 

MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of 

this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herman William RAEL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50133

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 24, 2017

Ajay Krishnamurthy, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael Emerson Lasater, Esquire, U.S. Attorney, Steve Miller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Herman William Rael, Pro Se

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Herman William Rael appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Rael contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court has authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). *See United States v. Wesson,*583 F.3d 728, 730 (9th Cir. 2009). Rael was sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Thus, his sentence was not “based on” a Guideline that was lowered by Amendment 782. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); *Wesson,*583 F.3d at 731. Further, insofar as Rael contends that the district court erred when it determined that he was a career offender, this claim is not cognizable in a section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. *See Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 831, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (alleged sentencing errors are “outside the scope of the proceeding authorized by § 3582(c)(2)”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 37

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favorednation treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 10, 1995

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of the

People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 2, 1995, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jermaine D. HENDERSON, a.k.a. Moet, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30119

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 27, 2017

*678Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bruce Miyake, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jermaine D. Henderson, Pro Se

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jermaine D. Henderson appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Henderson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Henderson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 59

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature of the State

of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy

and Natural Resources

JOINT RESOLUTION

To consent to certain amendments enacted by the Legislature

of the State of Hawaii to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, as required by section 4 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

4 Act to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii

5 into the Union’’, approved March 18, 1959 (73 Stat. 4),

6 the United States consents to the following amendments

7 to the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, 1920, adopted

8 by the State of Hawaii in the manner required for State

9 legislation:
2

•SJ 59 IS

1 (1) Act 339 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

2 1993.

3 (2) Act 37 of the Session Laws of Hawaii,

4 1994.

Æ
#### Bryon GOSSARD, d/b/a Gilbert Indoor Range, LLC, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael FRONCZAK, Director of Industry Operations, U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-2187

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 31, 2017

Decided: November 13, 2017

Athan T. Tsimpedes, TSIMPEDES LAW FIRM, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, Acting United States Attorney, Jane E. Andersen, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bryon Gossard, d/b/a Gilbert Indoor Range, LLC, appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Respondent and upholding the decision to deny his application for a federal firearms license, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Gossard v. Fronczak,*No. 8:15-cv-00850-TDC, 2016 WL 4240317, 2016 WL 3647611 (D. Md. filed Aug. 10, 2016, entered Aug. 11, 2016; June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 33
                                  ----------


          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
# Appendix C .5 VISTAS Emission Inventory Supporting DocumentationAp p e nd i x C . 5 - 1Ap p e nd i x C . 5 - 2 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS Development of the VISTAS Draft 2002 Mobile Source Emission Inventory (February 2004 version), Pechan ................................................................................................ .....3 Documentation of the Base G 2002 Base Year, 2009 and 2018 Emissions Inventory for VISTAS, MACTEC, Inc............................................................................................................ ....62 Memorandum to VISTAS State Point Contacts and VISTAS EGU Special Interest Workgroup, from Gregory Stella, June 13, 2005............................................................................................. 318
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick Gaston BROWN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6991

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: January 11, 2018

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Kosky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003), When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions to appoint *132counsel and compel discovery, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
**EXHIBIT
32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending April 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Theodore A. Boutacoff,
Chief Executive Officer, and Larry Tannenbaum, Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: May 17,
2005







By:
      /s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFFName:
      Theodore A. BoutacoffTitle:
      President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: May 17,
2005





By:
      /s/ LARRY TANNENBAUMName:
      Larry TannenbaumTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer and Vice President,Administration(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
# Official Journal C 318A/8 Se

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 318A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 668 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 318A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 668 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2023/C 318 A/01 | Recruitment notice PE/293/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Secretary-General – Cabinet of the Secretary-General | 1 |
| 2023/C 318 A/02 | Recruitment notice PE/295/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support – Directorate for Publishing, Innovation and Data Management | 6 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2023/C 318 A/01

Recruitment notice PE/293/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Secretary-General – Cabinet of the Secretary-General

1

2023/C 318 A/02

Recruitment notice PE/295/S – Director (function group AD, grade 14) – Directorate-General for Innovation and Technological Support – Directorate for Publishing, Innovation and Data Management

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 45 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.45
                                        Agreed to March 13, 1996        

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the United States Capitol is hereby authorized to 
be used on May 2, 1996, at 2 o'clock post meridian for the presentation 
of the Congressional Gold Medal to Reverend and Mrs. Billy Graham. 
Physical preparations for the conduct of the ceremony shall be carried 
out in accordance with such conditions as may be prescribed by the 
Architect of the Capitol.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

KEITH HALL BARKLEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2411 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 144 DB 2016

Attorney Registration No. 70521

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14 th day of November , 2017, upon consideration of the Report

and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Keith Hall Barkley is suspended from

t he Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the

provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).