alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of Amendment to Performance Share Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.10 
 SAIC, INC. 
 AMENDMENT TO 

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARD AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment, effective as of March 22, 2012
amends each outstanding Performance Share Award Agreement (each, an “Agreement”) between SAIC, Inc. and Recipient. 
 The provisions
of each Agreement that are not amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such terms in the
Agreement. 
 Section 4 of each Agreement is hereby amended to add the following new paragraph immediately following the existing text of
Section 4: 
 “If the Company pays any cash dividends on its common stock, Recipient will be entitled to receive an
amount in cash (less any required withholding for taxes) equal to the value of such cash dividends that would have been paid on Shares earned under this Agreement if such Shares had been outstanding as of the record date for such dividends declared
on or after the Grant Date and prior to the issuance date of the Shares (“Dividend Equivalents”). Such Dividend Equivalents will be will be retained by the Company (without interest) and paid in cash when, and if, and to the extent that
Shares are earned and issued based on the achievement of the Performance Goals. To the extent that Recipient has elected to defer receipt of the Shares in accordance with the terms of the applicable non-qualified deferral plan, payment of Dividend
Equivalents with respect to such Shares will be subject to the terms and conditions of such plan. The right to Dividend Equivalents will cease and be forfeited upon the forfeiture and cancellation of this Performance Share Award.” 

March 2012
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report (the Report) on the Form 10-K of Munro Developments Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Jabour, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: April 16, 2014  /s/ DANIEL JABOUR Daniel Jabour Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary and Director
# EUR-Lex - 32003F0613(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003F0613(01)

**Council act of 8 May 2003 drawing up a Protocol amending, as regards the creation of a customs files identification database, the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes **

*
Official Journal 139 , 13/06/2003 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Council act

of 8 May 2003

drawing up a Protocol amending, as regards the creation of a customs files identification database, the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes

(2003/C 139/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 34(2)(d) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic(1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(2),

WHEREAS the Customs Information System provided for in the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes(3) should be used for the exchange of information concerning the existence of documents about ongoing or completed investigations and for the appropriate coordination of investigations,

HAS DECIDED that the Protocol, the text of which is given in the Annex and which has been signed today by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, is hereby established,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements(4).

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2003.

For the Council

The President

M. Chrisochoïdis

(1) OJ C 328, 23.11.2001, p. 12.

(2) Opinion delivered on 18 December 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 34.

(4) The date of entry into force of the Protocol will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 802 

To require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan to 

provide chiropractic health care services and benefits for certain new 

beneficiaries as part of the TRICARE program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. ROGERS of Alabama (for himself and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to develop and implement a plan to provide chiropractic health care services 

and benefits for certain new beneficiaries as part of 

the TRICARE program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chiropractic Health 

5 Parity for Military Beneficiaries Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 802 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHIROPRACTIC HEALTH CARE FOR RETIREES, DE2 PENDENTS, AND SURVIVORS. 

3 (a) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than August 31, 

4 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall complete develop5 ment of a plan to provide chiropractic health care services 

6 and benefits, as a permanent part of the TRICARE pro7 gram, for covered beneficiaries. 

8 (b) CONTENTS OF PLAN.—The plan shall require 

9 that a contract entered into under section 1097 of title 

10 10, United States Code, for the delivery of health care 

11 services shall— 

12 (1) include the delivery of chiropractic services; 

13 (2) require that chiropractic services may be 

14 provided only by a doctor of chiropractic; and 

15 (3) provide that a covered beneficiary may se16 lect and have direct access to a doctor of chiro17 practic without referral by another health practi18 tioner. 

19 (c) IMPLEMENTATION OF PLAN.—The plan developed 

20 under subsection (a) shall provide for implementation of 

21 the plan to begin no later than January 31, 2016. 

22 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

23 In this Act: 

24 (1) The term ‘‘chiropractic services’’— 

25 (A) includes diagnosis (including by diag26 nostic x-ray tests), evaluation and management, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 802 IH

1 and therapeutic services for the treatment of a 

2 patient’s health condition, including neuro3 musculoskeletal conditions and the subluxation 

4 complex, and such other services determined ap5 propriate by the Secretary and as authorized 

6 under State law; and 

7 (B) does not include the use of drugs or 

8 surgery. 

9 (2) The term ‘‘covered beneficiary’’ has the 

10 meaning provided by section 1072(5) of title 10, 

11 United States Code. 

12 (3) The term ‘‘doctor of chiropractic’’ means 

13 only a doctor of chiropractic who is licensed as a 

14 doctor of chiropractic, chiropractic physician, or chi15 ropractor by a State, the District of Columbia, or a 

16 territory or possession of the United States. 

17 (4) The term ‘‘TRICARE program’’ has the 

18 meaning provided by section 1072(7) of title 10, 

19 United States Code. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Animal Models of Aging.                    

*Date:*                         March 28, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702,                         *firthkm@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 1, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-04615 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0718

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

LUCAS JAMES RICHESON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2024

09/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0718
#### Edmund DUDA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-70585

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

*626Marc Van Der Hout, Valerie Anne Zu-kin, Esquire, Attorney, Van Der Hout, Bri-gagliano & Nightingale, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner

OIL, Meadow W. Platt, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *626*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Edmund Duda, a native and citizen of Poland, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying Duda’s motion to reopen, the BIA applied the general standard for motions to reopen in determining that Duda had not met the heavy burden of proving that the new evidence would likely change the result in the case. *See Matter of Goelho,*20 I. & N. Dec. 464, 472-73 (BIA 1992) (explaining that a party who seeks to reopen proceedings to pursue relief bears a “heavy burden” of proving that if proceedings before the immigration judge were reopened the new evidence would likely change the result in the case). However, the BIA did not conduct a separate prejudice analysis under the lower standard for motions to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel or provide a reasoned explanation for its decision. *See Bonilla v. Lynch,*840 F.3d 575, 588-89 (9th Cir. 2016); *Maravilla Maravilla v. Ashcroft,*381 F.3d 855, 859 (9th Cir. 2004) (“[T]he BIA directly adjudged the question of whether petitioners would win or lose their claim. The BIA thus abused its discretion by weighing the new prejudice evidence under standards more stringent than were proper: It should have asked only whether [prior counsel’s] deficient performance may have affected the proceedings.”); *Movsisian v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005) (‘We have long held that the BIA abuses its discretion when it fails to provide a reasoned explanation for its actions.”). We remand this matter to the BIA so that it may address Duda’s ineffective assistance claim and apply the correct standard. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Duda’s remaining contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided'by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2006-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic
      reports”);





2.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.


**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President(Senior
              Officer of the Depositor in charge ofSecuritization)




Date:
      March 26, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                           4,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (430)
<INVENTORY>                                     69,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,722
<PP&E>                                          46,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,249)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   164,488
<SALES>                                         67,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,451
<CGS>                                           50,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.98)


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 577 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to use existing authorities 

to furnish health care at non-Department of Veterans Affairs facilities 

to veterans who live more than 40 miles driving distance from the 

closest medical facility of the Department that furnishes the care sought 

by the veteran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Mr. ZINKE (for himself, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

ROKITA, Mr. LABRADOR, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. AMODEI, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. 

KILMER, Mr. YOHO, Mr. BARR, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. LONG, Mr. GUINTA, Mr. PALAZZO, and 

Mr. GROTHMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to use existing 

authorities to furnish health care at non-Department of 

Veterans Affairs facilities to veterans who live more than 

40 miles driving distance from the closest medical facility 

of the Department that furnishes the care sought by 

the veteran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 577 IH

1 SECTION 1. USE OF EXISTING DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

2 AFFAIRS AUTHORITIES TO FURNISH HEALTH 

3 CARE TO CERTAIN VETERANS WHO HAVE GE4 OGRAPHIC INACCESSIBILITY TO CARE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 shall use the authorities specified in subsection (b) to fur7 nish hospital care and medical services at non-Department 

8 of Veterans Affairs facilities to veterans who reside more 

9 than 40 miles driving distance from the closest medical 

10 facility of the Department to the residence of the veteran 

11 that furnishes the hospital care or medical services that 

12 are sought by the veteran, including a community-based 

13 outpatient clinic. 

14 (b) AUTHORITIES.—The authorities specified in this 

15 subsection are the following: 

16 (1) Section 1703 of title 38, United States 

17 Code, relating to contracts for the furnishing of hos18 pital care and medical services through non-Depart19 ment facilities. 

20 (2) Section 101 of the Veterans Access, Choice, 

21 and Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113– 

22 146; 128 Stat. 175), relating to the furnishing of 

23 hospital care and medical services to veterans 

24 through non-Department entities if the veteran is 

25 unable to schedule an appointment for the receipt of 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 577 IH

1 such care or services within the wait-time goals of 

2 the Veterans Health Administration. 

3 (3) Any other authority under the laws admin4 istered by the Secretary relating to the furnishing of 

5 hospital care and medical services at non-Depart6 ment facilities. 

7 (c) HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES.—In 

8 this section, the terms ‘‘hospital care’’ and ‘‘medical serv9 ices’’ have the meanings given such terms in section 1701 

10 of title 38, United States Code. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS