alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.22
                                     Agreed to December 19, 1995        

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio Conference 
  of 1992 about conservation of the seas;
Whereas 1998 has been declared the ``International Year of the Ocean'' 
  by the United Nations in an effort to alert the world to the need for 
  improving the physical and cultural assets offered by the world's 
  oceans;
Whereas the theme of Expo '98 is ``The Oceans, a Heritage for the 
  Future'';
Whereas Expo '98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, 
  and public opinion to the growing importance of the world's oceans;
Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships 
  through ocean exploration;
Whereas Portugal's history is rich with examples of the courage and 
  exploits of Portuguese explorers;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship based on 
  mutual respect, and a sharing of interests and ideals, particularly 
  the deeply held commitment to democratic values;
Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to 
  Portugal; and
Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995 Agreement on 
  Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the 2 countries would consider 
  and develop appropriate means of commemorating the upcoming 
  quincentennial anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by 
  Vasco da Gama: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the United States should fully participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, 
Portugal, and encourage the private sector to support this worthwhile 
undertaking.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
          OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
          ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
          REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                27,057
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         53,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,237
<INVENTORY>                                           26,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     120,357
<PP&E>                                               355,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                        13,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       482,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 40,339
<BONDS>                                              230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  43
<OTHER-SE>                                           185,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         482,737
<SALES>                                               56,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      56,765
<CGS>                                                 47,439
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         47,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       5,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          55
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     2,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                             468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          $0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          $0.03

         

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002F1216(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002F1216(01)

**Council act of 28 November 2002 drawing up a Protocol amending the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) and the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the deputy directors and the employees of Europol **

*
Official Journal 312 , 16/12/2002 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Council act

of 28 November 2002

drawing up a Protocol amending the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) and the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the deputy directors and the employees of Europol

(2002/C 312/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office(1), and in particular Article 43(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the deputy directors and employees of Europol(2), and in particular Article 18 thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of Spain(3),

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament(4),

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board,

CONSIDERING that the need to enable Europol's participation in joint investigation teams and to adopt measures allowing Europol to ask Member States to initiate investigations in specific cases has been explicitly foreseen in Article 30(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

CONSIDERING that Europol's participation in a support capacity in operational actions of joint investigation teams of the Member States requires an adjustment of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the deputy directors and the employees of Europol,

HAS DECIDED to establish a Protocol, the text of which is attached, amending the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) and the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of Europol, the members of its organs, the deputy directors and the employees of Europol, which has been signed today by the representatives of the governments of the Member States of the European Union,

RECOMMENDS that it be adopted by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

Done at Brussels on 28 November 2002.

For the Council

The President

B. Haarder

(1) OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

(2) OJ C 221, 19.7.1997, p. 2.

(3) OJ C 42, 15.2.2002, p. 8.

(4) Opinion delivered 30 May 2002 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
#### Keith F. KRAEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1656

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 25, 2017

Decided: November 13, 2017

Keith F. Kraemer, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Kathleen McTighe Mellen, Charles R. Norris, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith F. Kraemer appeals from the district court’s April 26, 2017, order denying his motion seeking leave to amend his complaint and its April 28, 2017, order granting summary judgment to Defendant on the claims in his civil action for breach of contract and insurance bad faith, insofar as the claims relate to the termination of benefit payments on his 65th birthday. Kraemer’s appellate arguments fail to explain how the district court reversibly erred in denying leave to amend his complaint. Accordingly, we deem this issue abandoned. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b) (directing appealing parties to present specific arguments in an informal brief and stating that this court’s review on appeal is limited to the issues raised in the informal brief); *United States v. Holness,*706 F.3d 579, 592 (4th Cir. 2013) (noting the “oft-cited rule that contentions not raised in the argument section of the opening brief are abandoned” (internal quotation marks omitted)); *Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (noting that appellate assertions not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).

We also have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant. Accordingly, we affirm for the *269reasons stated by the district court. *Kraemer v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*No. 2:15-cv-04571-CWH (D.S.C. Apr. 26 & 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 33

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas at its inception, the Capitol of the United States of

America was blessed to rise under the hand of some of

this Nation’s greatest architects, including Dr. William

Thornton, Benjamin Henry Latrobe, and Charles

Bullfinch;

Whereas prior to the Honorable George Malcolm White,

FAIA, being appointed by President Nixon on January

27, 1971, it had been 106 years since a professional architect had been named to the post of Architect of the

Capitol;

Whereas Mr. White has served the Congress through an unprecedented period of growth and modernization, using to

advantage his professional accreditation in architecture,

engineering, law, and business;

Whereas Mr. White has prepared the Capitol Complex for the

next century by developing the ‘‘Master Plan for the Future Development of the Capitol Grounds and Related

Areas’’;

Whereas Mr. White has added new buildings to the Capitol

grounds as authorized by Congress, including the

Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, the Philip A. Hart Senate Office Building, and the Library of

Congress James Madison Memorial Building, and
2

SCON 33 ES

through acquisition and renovation, the Thomas P.

O’Neill and Gerald R. Ford House Office Buildings, the

Webster Hall Senate Page Dormitory, and the Capitol

Police Headquarters Building;

Whereas Mr. White has preserved for future generations the

existing historic fabric of the Capitol Complex by faithfully restoring the Old Senate Chamber, the Old Supreme

Court Chamber, National Statuary Hall, the Brumidi

corridors, the Rotunda canopy and frieze, the West

Central Front and Terraces of the Capitol, the House

Monumental Stairs, the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson and John Adams Buildings, and the Statue of

Freedom atop the Capitol Dome;

Whereas Mr. White has greatly contributed to the preservation and enhancement of the design of the District of Columbia through his place on the District of Columbia

Zoning Commission, the Commission of Fine Arts, the

Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation, and

other civic organizations and commissions; and

Whereas upon Mr. White’s retirement on November 21,

1995, he leaves a legacy of tremendous accomplishment,

having made the Capitol his life’s work and brought to

this century the erudition and polymath’s capacity of our

first Architects: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the thanks and good wishes of the

3 American people are hereby tendered to the Honorable

4 George M. White, FAIA, on the occasion of his retirement
3

SCON 33 ES

1 from the Office of the Architect of the Capitol after nearly

2 a quarter-century of outstanding service to this nation.

Passed the Senate November 20, 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 33

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the thanks and good wishes of the

Architect of the Capitol.White on the occasion of his retirement as theAmerican people to the Honorable George M.
#### Rodney Bernard BARNO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David LOPEZ, Officer at CSATF; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16460

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2017 *

Filed May 11, 2017

Rodney Bernard Barno, Pro Se

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

California state prisoner Rodney Bernard Barno appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and retaliation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court order. *Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc.,*356 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Because the record shows that Barno stood on his first amended complaint, the district court abused its discretion in converting its dismissal with leave to amend into a sanction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failing to comply with a court order. *See Edwards,*356 F.3d at 1064-65 (dismissal under Rule 41(b) is not appropriate where the plaintiff makes an affirmative choice not to amend the complaint).

Nevertheless, the district court properly dismissed Barno’s claims against defendants Corral and Zamora relating to the prison grievance process because Barno has no constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure. *See Ramirez v. Galaza,*334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[Ijnmates lack a separate constitutional entitlement to a specific prison grievance procedure.”).

The district court erred, however, in dismissing Barno’s claims that the district court previously found to be cognizable. Barno re-pled in his first amended complaint a claim of excessive force against defendant Lopez and a claim against de*984fendant Johnson relating to labeling Barno a snitch, which the district court properly-concluded stated cognizable claims. We reverse the judgment as to those claims and remand for further proceedings.

The district court dismissed Barno’s retaliation claims because it concluded that Barno failed to cure certain deficiencies and failed to establish exhaustion of his administrative remedies as to these claims. Barno has no obligation to plead and prove exhaustion. *See Jones v. Bock,*549 U.S. 199, 204, 216, 127 S.Ct. 910, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007); *Albino v. Baca,*747 F.3d 1162, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc). We vacate the judgment as to the retaliation claims and remand for further proceedings.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

***

 disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended August 1, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 4, 2009

|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                                                         
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. Executive Vice President -Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### SEALED PETITIONER, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 17-60512 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 20, 2017

Lance Edward Curtright, Esq., De Mott McChesney Curtright & Armendariz, L.L.P., San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner

Sarah Abigail Byrd, Kerry Ann Monaco, Trial Attorneys, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We lack jurisdiction to consider the two issues Petitioner raises on appeal. First, he contends that the Board of Immigration Appeals failed to apply the “clearly erroneous” standard of review and instead “rejected the [immigration judge’s] record-*348based findings in favor of [the Board’s] own assessment of the evidence.” But this issue is outside our jurisdiction because Petitioner never presented it to the Board. *See Omari v. Holder,*562 F.3d 314, 319-21 (5th Cir. 2009), Second, Petitioner contends that the Board made erroneous factual findings. But he is removable for having committed crimes covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and (B)(i), depriving us of jurisdiction to review issues of fact. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C),(D). Although Petitioner is correct that that we may review whether the facts found are legally sufficient to warrant relief, *see, e.g., Alvarado de Rodriguez v. Holder,*585 F.3d 227, 234 (5th Cir. 2009); *Matter of Z-Z-O,*26 I. & N. Dec. 586, 590-91 (BIA 2015), that is not the nature of his appeal. Rather, he complains that he “presented substantial, credible, and unchallenged evidence” contradicting the Board’s findings. That is squarely an issue of fact. *See, e.g., Escudero-Arciniega v. Holder,*702 F.3d 781, 785 (5th Cir. 2012); *Morka v. Holder,*554 Fed. Appx. 342, 343 (5th Cir. 2014).

It is therefore ORDERED that Respondent’s opposed motion to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1075 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32003R1075

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1075/2003 of 23 June 2003 fixing the weighting coefficients to be used in calculating the Community market price for pig carcasses for the 2003/04 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 155 , 24/06/2003 P. 0009 - 0010 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1075/2003

of 23 June 2003

fixing the weighting coefficients to be used in calculating the Community market price for pig carcasses for the 2003/04 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1365/2000(2), and in particular Article 4(6) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The Community market price for pig carcasses, as referred to in Article 4(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75, must be established by weighting the prices recorded in each Member State by coefficients expressing the relative size of the pig population of each Member State.

(2) These coefficients should be determined on the basis of the number of pigs counted at the beginning of December each year in accordance with Council Directive 93/23/EEC of 1 June 1993 on the statistical surveys to be carried out on pig production(3), as last amended by Directive 97/77/EC(4).

(3) In view of the results of the census of December 2002, new weighting coefficients should be set for the 2003/04 marketing year and Commission Regulation (EC) No 903/2002 should be repealed(5).

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The weighting coefficients referred to in Article 4(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 shall be as specified in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

Regulation (EC) No 903/2002 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 July 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 June 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 156, 29.6.2000, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 149, 21.6.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 10, 16.1.1998, p. 28.

(5) OJ L 142, 31.5.2002, p. 23.

ANNEX

Weighting coefficients to be used in calculating the Community market price for pig carcasses for the 2003/04 marketing year

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75

>TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julio Cesar MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40104 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

. Julio Cesar Martinez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.