alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 437



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CR-14-364 DELBERT RAYMOND PRICE APPELLANT V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2013-1576-1] HONORABLE WILLIAM A. STOREY, JUDGE REBRIEFING ORDERED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge Delbert Price was tried by the court as an habitual offender and found guilty of the offense of theft of a rented vehicle. He was sentenced to thirty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction, with twenty-four of the thirty years suspended. A timely notice of appeal was filed. In Price v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 173, we denied counsel’s first motion to withdraw and ordered a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum because we found deficiencies. In this second attempt, Price’s counsel again seeks to withdraw, asserting that an appeal in this case would be wholly without merit. She has filed another motion and brief, purportedly pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Because deficiencies remain in this second attempt to withdraw, we again deny the motion and order rebriefing. As we explained inCite as 2015 Ark. App. 437

Price , supra , an attorney attempting to withdraw from a criminal appeal is obligated to list every adverse ruling and explain how each ruling could provide no meritorious grounds for reversal. Even a single omission from a no-merit brief necessarily requires rebriefing. See also Weaver v. State , 2014 Ark. App. 34. Here, our independent review of the record reveals that at least three adverse rulings have still not been listed and addressed by counsel. Moreover, in addressing the adverse rulings, including the denials of the motions for directed verdict, counsel must fully explain why the trial court’s rulings could provide no meritorious grounds for appeal. Our mention of certain deficiencies does not in any way mean that there are no other adverse rulings that were omitted or that the record has been adequately abstracted, the addendum properly prepared, or the issues properly addressed. It is counsel’s responsibility to comply with the requirements for submitting a no-merit brief. Counsel is directed to file a compliant abstract, brief, and addendum within fifteen days from the date of this opinion, and, before doing so, we strongly encourage counsel to carefully review the Anders case, supra , and our Rule 4-3(k) concerning the requirements for submitting a no-merit brief. As noted in Weaver, supra , repeated failures to comply with the requirements for filing a no-merit brief will be referred to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Rebriefing ordered; motion to withdraw denied. H ARRISONand K INARD , JJ., agree. Camille Edmison-Wilhelmi , for appellant. No response. 2
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6398 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for the inclusion of unmarried 

women in the criteria for awarding a grant to a women’s business center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to provide for the inclusion 

of unmarried women in the criteria for awarding a grant 

to a women’s business center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF UNMARRIED WOMEN IN GRANT 

4 CRITERIA. 

5 Section 29(f)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 656(f)(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, including 

7 those who are not married’’ after ‘‘disadvantaged’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III

★(Star Print)

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 170

To appoint various chairmen for the 104th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 5), 1995

Mr. DOLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To appoint various chairmen for the 104th Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following Senators are named

2 chairmen of the following committees for the 104th Con3 gress, or until their successors are appointed:

4 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: William Roth of Delaware.

5 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS: Ted Ste6 vens of Alaska.

7 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: John

8 Warner of Virginia.

Æ
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Alesha Dawn Keller, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00042

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.
CR1200591 ). Opinion delivere d by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial co urt

. We note that the appellant, Alesha Dawn Keller, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARC H 27, 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date:                August 16, 2005 |                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                                            |
|                                 | By:                /s/ BARRY G. CALDWELL                                                        |
|                                 | Name:                Barry G. Caldwell                                                          |
|                                 | Title:                President and Chief Executive Officer                                     |
|                                 | (Principal                Executive Officer)                                                    |
|                                 |                                                                                            |
| Date:                August 16, 2005 |                                                                                            |
|                                 |                                                                                            |
|                                 | By:                /s/ LARRY TANNENBAUM                                                         |
|                                 | Name:                Larry Tannenbaum                                                           |
|                                 | Title:                Chief Financial Officer and Vice President,                Administration |
|                                 | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer)                                     |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jason Dean BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7320

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Jason Dean Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ashe-ville, North Carolina; Benjamin Bain-Creed, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee,

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

. Jason Dean Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 'U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2263(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate *195both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 728 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 728

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ``Sergeant First 
               Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

Mr. Luetkemeyer (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mrs. Wagner, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. 
 Cleaver, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mr. Long, and Mr. Smith of Missouri) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ``Sergeant First 
               Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM B. WOODS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of 310 Holdings, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicole
Wright, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








310
HOLDINGS, INC
 By /s/ Nicole
Wright
 Nicole
Wright
 Chief
Financial officer
 
 March 31,
2009
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 64

  To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans for their 
 defense of democratic ideals and their important contribution to the 
                        outcome of World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 1996

    Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Akaka) submitted the following 
   concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  To recognize and honor the Filipino World War II veterans for their 
 defense of democratic ideals and their important contribution to the 
                        outcome of World War II.

Whereas the Commonwealth of the Philippines was strategically located and thus 
        vital to the defense of the United States during World War II;
Whereas the military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines were called 
        into the United States Armed Forces during World War II by Executive 
        order and were put under the command of General Douglas MacArthur;
Whereas the participation of the military forces of the Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines in the battles of Bataan and Corregidor and in other smaller 
        skirmishes delayed and disrupted the initial Japanese effort to conquer 
        the Western Pacific;
Whereas that delay and disruption allowed the United States the vital time to 
        prepare the forces which were needed to drive the Japanese from the 
        Western Pacific and to defeat Japan;
Whereas after the recovery of the Philippine Islands from Japan, the United 
        States was able to use the strategically located Commonwealth of the 
        Philippines as a base from which to launch the final efforts to defeat 
        Japan;
Whereas every American deserves to know the important contribution that the 
        military forces of the Commonwealth of the Philippines made to the 
        outcome of World War II; and
Whereas the Filipino World War II veterans deserve recognition and honor for 
        their important contribution to the outcome of World War II: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the President should issue a 
proclamation which recognizes and honors the Filipino World War II 
veterans for their defense of democratic ideals and their important 
contribution to the outcome of World War II.
                                 <all>
```
Docket No. FAA-2013-0868

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/4/13

Regional Airline Association 10/4/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/4/13

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 10/4/13
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 22

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should

participate in Expo ’98 in Lisbon, Portugal.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 28, (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Mr. PELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

should participate in Expo ’98 in Lisbon, Portugal.

Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio

Conference of 1992 about conservation of the seas;

Whereas 1998 has been declared the ‘‘International Year of

the Ocean’’ by the United Nations in an effort to alert

the world to the need for improving the physical and cultural assets offered by the world’s oceans;

Whereas the theme of Expo ’98 is ‘‘The Oceans, a Heritage

for the Future’’;

Whereas Expo ’98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, and public opinion to the growing importance of the world’s oceans;
2

•SCON 22 IS

Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships through ocean exploration;

Whereas Portugal’s history is rich with examples of the courage and exploits of Portuguese explorers;

Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship

based on mutual respect, and a sharing of interests and

ideals, particularly the deeply held commitment to democratic values;

Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Portugal; and

Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995

Agreement on Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the

2 countries would consider and develop appropriate

means of commemorating the upcoming quincentennial

anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by Vasco

da Gama: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the United States should fully partici3 pate in Expo ’98 in Lisbon, Portugal, and encourage the

4 private sector to support this worthwhile undertaking.

Æ
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trina Solar Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean Shao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 12, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Sean Shao          
|Name:  |  | Sean Shao              
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Stephen Lance BAKER, also known as Pudge, also known as Steve Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-1549

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 27, 2017

Filed: December 4, 2017

*610Kristin Huntington Bryant, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael S. Gordon, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cameron C. McCree, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Stephen Lance Baker, Pro Se

■Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Baker appeals from the sentence the District Court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug-related offense under a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. The government has moved to dismiss the appeal based on the appeal waiver.

After review, we conclude that the waiver is valid, applicable, and enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 997, 124 S.Ct. 501, 157 L.Ed.2d 398 (2003). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion to dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsel s motion to withdraw,

1

. The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Exhibit 99.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Peter Breese, Chief Executive Officer of Asanko Gold Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (i) the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 28, 2014/s/ Peter BreesePeter BreeseChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50275 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PATRICK AMEZQUITA, also known as Fat Pat, Defendant-Appellant.

____________________ Consolidated with No. 00-50277

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BERNARDO SALAS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-99-CR-264-13-SS

- - - - - - - - - - June 28, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *No. 00-50275 No. 00-50277 -2- Patrick Amezquita pleaded guilty to and was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marihuana and cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Bernardo Salas pleaded guilty to and was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute marihuana and cocaine and telephone facilitation. They appeal their conspiracy convictions for violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & 846. Appellants contend that the indictment was deficient because it did not allege a specific quantity of drugs. Appellants did not raise this issue before the district court. Therefore, we read the indictment “with maximum liberality and find it sufficient unless it is so defective that by any reasonable construction, it fails to charge the offense for which the defendant is convicted.” United States v. Lankford , 196 F.3d 563, 569 (5th Cir. 1999) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted), cert. denied , 529 U.S. 1119 (2000). No quantity of drugs is specified in 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) or 846. Therefore, it was not necessary to charge a quantity of drugs in the indictment, and the appellants’ indictment was sufficient. See United States v. Salazar-Flores , 238 F.3d 672, 673-74 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Doggett , 230 F.3d 160, 165 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1152 (2001).
AFFIRMED.
Order entered December 10 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00227

- CR

ALEXANDER MATTHEW GOOD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. F12

- 00588

- H



### O RDER

Appellant has filed a motion asking us reconsider setting the above case for oral

argument. The case had been set for submission without oral argument. Appellant’s motion is

GRANTED . The case will be reset in due course of the Court’s docket.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE