Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices 14317 

dimensions, identified by the OMB 

Statistical Policy Office in the 1993 

‘‘Resource Manual for Customer 

Surveys,’’ are courtesy, competence, 

reliability, and communication. The 

survey also provides airmen with the 

opportunity to provide feedback on the 

services and a medical certificate 

application tool they use. This 

information is used to inform 

improvements in Aeromedical 

Certification Services. 

The survey was initially deployed in 

2004, and deployed again in 2006, 2008, 

2012, 2014, 2016, 2019, and 2021 (OMB 

Control No. 2120–0707). Across 

collections, minor revisions have been 

made to the survey items and response 

options to reflect changes in operational 

services and survey technology. To 

reduce the burden on the individual 

respondent and potentially improve the 

response rate, this information 

collection will be electronic. 

Respondents: 5,300 Airmen. 

Frequency: Biannually. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: 15 minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 15 

minutes per respondent, 1,325 total 

burden hours. 

Issued in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on 

March 9, 2022. 

Ashley Catherine Awwad, 

Management & Program Analyst, Aerospace 

Medical Institute (CAMI), Flight Deck Human 

Factors Research Lab, AAM–510. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05343 Filed 3–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Intent To Release Certain 

Properties From All Terms, Conditions, 

Reservations and Restrictions of a 

Quitclaim Deed Agreement Between 

the City of Melbourne and the Federal 

Aviation Administration for the 

Melbourne International Airport, 

Melbourne, FL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides 

notice of intent to release 5.0 acres at 

the Melbourne International Airport, 

Melbourne, FL from the conditions, 

reservations, and restrictions as 

contained in a Quitclaim Deed 

agreement between the FAA and the 

City of Melbourne, dated August 6, 

1947. The release of property will allow 

the City of Melbourne to use the 

property for other than aeronautical 

purposes. The property is located 

located on 680 N Apollo Boulevard at 

the Melbourne International Airport in 

Brevard County. The parcel is currently 

designated as surplus property. The 

property will be released of its federal 

obligations for the purpose of selling the 

property at fair market value for 

commercial operation of an existing 

building and parking lot for the United 

States Postal Service. The fair market 

value lease of this parcel has been 

determined to be $1,800,000. 

Documents reflecting the Sponsor’s 

request are available, by appointment 

only, for inspection at the Melbourne 

International Airport and the FAA 

Airports District Office. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 

Investment and Reform Act for the 21st 

Century (AIR–21) requires the FAA to 

provide an opportunity for public notice 

and comment prior to the ‘‘waiver’’ or 

‘‘modification’’ of a sponsor’s Federal 

obligation to use certain airport land for 

non-aeronautical purposes. 

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

April 13, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for 

review at Melbourne International 

Airport, and the FAA Airports District 

Office, 8427 SouthPark Circle, Suite 

524, Orlando, FL 32819. Written 

comments on the Sponsor’s request 

must be delivered or mailed to: Marisol 

Elliott, Community Planner, Orlando 

Airports District Office, 8427 SouthPark 

Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, FL 32819. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marisol Elliott, Community Planner, 

Orlando Airports District Office, 8427 

SouthPark Circle, Suite 524, Orlando, 

FL 32819. 

Bartholomew Vernace, 

Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, 

Southern Region. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05348 Filed 3–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

[Docket No. FHWA–2022–0001] 

Proposed 2022 Renewal of 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) 

Assigning Certain Federal 

Environmental Responsibilities to the 

State of California, Including National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

Authority for Certain Categorical 

Exclusions (CEs) 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), Department of 

Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed renewal of 

MOU, request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA and the State of 

California, acting by and through its 

Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 

propose renewing the MOU authorizing 

Caltrans’ participation in the Categorical 

Exclusion Assignment program. This 

program allows FHWA to assign its 

authority and responsibility for 

determining whether certain designated 

activities within the geographic 

boundaries of the State, as specified in 

the proposed MOU, are categorically 

excluded from preparation of an 

environmental assessment or an 

environmental impact statement under 

the National Environmental Policy Act. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 13, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by DOT Document 

Management System (DMS) Docket 

Number FHWA–2022–0001, by any of 

the methods described below. To ensure 

that you do not duplicate your 

submissions, please submit them by 

only one of the means below. Electronic 

comments are preferred because Federal 

offices experience intermittent mail 

delays from security screening. 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

website: http://www.regulations.gov/. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

comments on the DOT electronic docket 

site. 

Facsimile (Fax): 1–202–493–2251. 

Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 

20590. 

Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Eastern 

Time, Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For access to the docket to view a 

complete copy of the proposed 2022 

renewal MOU, or to read background 

documents or comments received, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time, 

or to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Instructions: You must include the 

agency name and docket number at the 

beginning of your comments. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

FHWA: Shawn Oliver; by email at 

Shawn.Oliver@dot.gov or by telephone 

at 916–498–5048. The California 

Division Office’s normal business hours 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
14318 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices 

are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (Pacific Time), 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. For the State of California: 

Chris Benz-Blumberg: By email at 

Chris.Benz-Blumberg@dot.ca.gov or by 

telephone at 916–956–8660. The 

Caltrans’ business hours are the same as 

above although State holidays may not 

completely coincide with Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access 

Internet users may reach the Office of 

the Federal Register’s home page at: 

http://www.archives.gov/ and the 

Government Publishing Office’s 

database at: http://www.govinfo.gov/. 

An electronic version of the proposed 

2022 renewal MOU may be downloaded 

by accessing the DOT DMS docket, as 

described above, at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Background 

Section 326 of Title 23 U.S. Code, 

creates a program that allows the 

Secretary of the U.S. Department of 

Transportation (Secretary), to assign, 

and a State to assume, responsibility for 

determining whether certain highway 

projects are included within classes of 

action that are categorically excluded 

(CE) from requirements for 

environmental assessments or 

environmental impact statements 

pursuant to the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq. (NEPA). In addition, this program 

allows the assignment of other 

environmental review requirements 

applicable to Federal highway projects. 

The FHWA is authorized to act on 

behalf of the Secretary with respect to 

these matters. 

The FHWA renewed California’s 

participation in this program for a 

fourth time on April 18, 2019. The 

original MOU became effective on June 

7, 2007, for an initial term of 3 years. 

The first renewal followed on June 7, 

2010, the second renewal followed on 

June 7, 2013. The third renewal 

followed on May 31, 2016, and was 

amended on December 30, 2016. The 

fourth renewal has an expiration date of 

April 18, 2022. 

Prior MOUs in this program had 3- 

year terms. Changes to 23 U.S.C. 

326(c)(3) under the Bipartisan 

Infrastructure Law (Infrastructure 

Investment and Jobs Act, Pub. L. 117– 

58), enacted on November 15, 2021, 

require that MOUs have a term of 5 

years for a State that has assumed the 

responsibility for CEs under the 

program for 10 years or longer. Caltrans 

has participated in this program for 14 

years. Therefore, this proposed renewal 

MOU will have a term of 5 years. 

Statewide decision making 

responsibility would be assigned for all 

activities identified in the MOU within 

the categories listed in 23 CFR 

771.117(c) and those listed as examples 

in 23 CFR 771.111(d), and any activities 

added through FHWA rulemaking to 

those listed in 23 CFR 771.117(c) or 

example activities listed in 23 CFR 

771.117(d) after the date of the 

execution of this MOU. In addition to 

the NEPA CE determination 

responsibilities, the MOU would assign 

to the State the responsibility for 

conducting Federal environmental 

review, consultation, and other related 

activities for projects that are subject to 

the MOU with respect to the following 

Federal laws and Executive Orders: 

• Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401– 

7671q. Including determinations for 

project-level conformity if required for 

the project, except as specified in 

Stipulation II.B.2 of the MOU 

• Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. 

4901–4918 

• Compliance with the noise 

regulations in 23 CFR part 772 (except 

approval of the State noise policy in 

accordance with 23 CFR 772.7) 

• Section 7 of the Endangered Species 

Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, and 

1536 

• Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 

U.S.C. 1361–1423h 

• Anadromous Fish Conservation Act, 

16 U.S.C. 757a–757f 

• Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 

16 U.S.C. 661–667d 

• Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 

703–712 

• Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act of 

1976, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1801– 

1891d 

• Section 106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, 

54 U.S.C. 306108 

• Archeological Resources Protection 

Act of 1979, 16 U.S.C. 470aa–mm 

• Title 54, Chapter 3125—Preservation 

of Historical and Archeological Data, 

54 U.S.C. 312501–312508 

• Native American Grave Protection 

and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 

U.S.C. 3001–3013; 18 U.S.C. 1170 

• Section 4(f) of the Department of 

Transportation Act of 1966, 23 U.S.C. 

138 and 49 U.S.C. 303; 23 CFR part 

774, except as specified in Stipulation 

II.B.2 of the MOU 

• American Indian Religious Freedom 

Act, 42 U.S.C. 1996 

• Farmland Protection Policy Act 

(FPPA), 7 U.S.C. 4201–4209 

• Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251– 

1377, Sections 401, 404, and 319 

• Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16 

U.S.C. 3501–3510 

• Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 

U.S.C. 1451–1466 

• Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 

U.S.C. 403 

• Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. 

1271–1287 

• Emergency Wetlands Resources Act, 

16 U.S.C. 3921, 3931 

• Wetlands Mitigation, 23 U.S.C 

103(b)(6)(m), 133(b)(3) 

• FHWA wetland and natural habitat 

mitigation regulations, 23 CFR part 

777 

• Flood Disaster Protection Act, 42 

U.S.C. 4001–4128 

• Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 42 

U.S.C. 300f–300j–6 

• Land and Water Conservation Fund 

(LWCF), Public Law 88–578, 78 Stat. 

897 (known as Section 6(f)) 

• Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9675 

• Superfund Amendments and 

Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), 

42 U.S.C. 9671–9675 

• Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992k 

• Landscaping and Scenic 

Enhancement (Wildflowers), 23 

U.S.C. 319 

• E.O. 11990, Protection of Wetlands 

• E.O. 11988, Floodplain Management 

(except approving design standards 

and determinations that a significant 

encroachment is the only practicable 

alternative under 23 CFR 650.113 and 

650.115) 

• E.O. 12898, Federal Actions to 

Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low 

Income Populations 

• E.O. 11593, Protection and 

Enhancement of Cultural Resources 

• E.O. 13007, Indian Sacred Sites 

• E.O. 13122, Invasive Species 

• Planning and Environment Linkages, 

23 U.S.C. 168, except for those FHWA 

responsibilities associated with 23 

U.S.C. 134 and 135 

• Programmatic Mitigation Plans, 23 

U.S.C. 169 except for those FHWA 

responsibilities associated with 23 

U.S.C. 134 and 135. 

The MOU allows the State to act in 

the place of FHWA in carrying out the 

functions described above, except with 

respect to government-to-government 

consultations with federally recognized 

Indian Tribes. The FHWA will retain 

responsibility for conducting formal 

government-to-government consultation 

with federally recognized Indian Tribes, 

which is required under some of the 

above-listed laws and Executive Orders. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2022 / Notices 14319 

The State may also assist FHWA with 

formal consultations, with consent of a 

tribe, but FHWA remains responsible for 

the consultation. 

The FHWA will consider the 

comments submitted on the proposed 

fifth renewal MOU when making its 

decision on whether to execute this 

MOU. The FHWA will make the final, 

executed MOU publicly available. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 326; 42 U.S.C. 

4331, 4332; 23 CFR 771.117; 40 CFR 

1507.3, 1508.4. 

Vincent Mammano, 

Division Administrator, Federal Highway 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05332 Filed 3–11–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0082] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget for Review 

and Approval: Drivers’ Use of CameraBased Rear Visibility Systems Versus 

Traditional Mirrors 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments on a request for approval of 

a new information collection. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), this notice announces the 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

abstracted below has been forwarded to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval. The ICR 

describes the nature of the information 

collection and its expected burden. The 

proposed new collection of information 

supports research addressing safetyrelated aspects of drivers’ use of camerabased rear visibility systems intended to 

serve as a replacement for traditional 

outside rearview mirrors. 

A Federal Register Notice with a 60- 

day comment period soliciting 

comments on the following information 

collection was published on August 28, 

2019. NHTSA received 22 public 

comments submitted online and one 

additional comment submitted via 

email. A second Federal Register Notice 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments on the following information 

collection was published on May 24, 

2021. NHTSA received 1,891 unique 

public comments. A summary of the 

comments and the changes NHTSA 

made in response to those comments is 

provided below. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted on or before April 13, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection, including 

suggestions for reducing burden, should 

be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget at 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

To find this particular information 

collection, select ‘‘Currently under 30- 

day Review—Open for Public 

Comment’’ or use the search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or access to 

background documents, contact 

Elizabeth Mazzae, Applied Crash 

Avoidance Research Division, Vehicle 

Research and Test Center, NHTSA, 

10820 State Route 347—Bldg. 60, East 

Liberty, Ohio 43319; Telephone (937) 

666–4511; Facsimile: (937) 666–3590; 

email address: elizabeth.mazzae@

dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a Federal 

agency must receive approval from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) before it collects certain 

information from the public and a 

person is not required to respond to a 

collection of information by a Federal 

agency unless the collection displays a 

valid OMB control number. In 

compliance with these requirements, 

this notice announces the following 

information collection request will be 

submitted to OMB. 

Title: Drivers’ Use of Camera-Based 

Rear Visibility Systems Versus 

Traditional Mirrors. 

OMB Control Number: To be issued at 

time of approval. 

Form Numbers: NHTSA forms 1553, 

1554, 1556, 1557, 1558. 

Type of Request: New information 

collection. 

Type of Review Requested: Regular. 

Length of Approval Requested: Three 

years from the date of approval. 

Summary of the Collection of 

Information: NHTSA has proposed to 

perform research involving the 

collection of information from the 

public as part of a multi-year effort to 

learn about drivers’ use of passive 

camera-based rear visibility systems 

intended to perform the same function 

as traditional vehicle outside mirrors: 

Displaying areas surrounding the 

vehicle. Performing detection of objects 

within the system’s field of view and 

providing visual or other alerts to the 

driver is not a technology function being 

examined in this research. 

The research will involve human 

subjects testing in which instrumented 

vehicles are stationary or driven on a 

test track and public roads. Study 

participants will be members of the 

general public and participation will be 

voluntary. The goal is to characterize 

drivers’ eye glance behavior and other 

driving behaviors while operating a 

vehicle equipped with traditional 

outside mirrors versus while operating a 

vehicle equipped with a camera-based 

visibility system in place of vehicle 

outside mirrors. This research will 

support NHTSA decisions relating to 

safe implementation of electronic 

visibility technologies that may be 

considered for use as alternatives to 

meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standard (FMVSS) No. 111 mirror 

requirements. 

This research will involve 

information collection through 

participant screening questions and 

post-drive questionnaires. Questions 

addressed to individuals will serve to 

assess individuals’ suitability for study 

participation, to obtain feedback 

regarding participants’ use of the 

visibility systems involved in the study, 

and to evaluate individuals’ level of 

comfort with use of the technology. 

Since qualitative feedback or selfreported data is not sufficiently robust 

for the purpose of investigating driver 

performance and interaction issues with 

advanced vehicle technologies, the 

primary type of information to be 

collected in this research is objective 

data consisting of video and engineering 

data recorded as participants experience 

a camera-based rear visibility system in 

an instrumented study vehicle. 

Recorded objective data will include 

driver eye glance behavior, lane change 

performance, and other driving 

performance metrics. Eye glance 

behavior will reveal how drivers’ visual 

behavior in a vehicle equipped with a 

camera-based rear visibility system 

differs from drivers’ visual behavior in 

a vehicle equipped with traditional 

outside mirrors. Lane change 

performance will be characterized based 

on vehicle speed, inter-vehicle distances 

during lane changes, and time to 

complete lane changes. Driving 

performance and eye glance behavior in 

a vehicle equipped with a camera-based 

rear visibility system will be compared 

to lane change performance observed in 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1