alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40218

Summary Calendar

 

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

PARDONS & PAROLE DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-264)

_________________________________________________________________

October 3, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Robert Parker, Texas inmate #325353, appeals the

denial of his habeas corpus petition challenging the revocation

of his parole and continued confinement in prison. He raises the

following issues on appeal: 1) the evidence was insufficient to

justify revocation of his parole; 2) his waiver of the
2

preliminary revocation hearing was coerced; 3) he was denied

counsel when he pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge arising

from the same operative facts as the basis for the revocation of

his parole; 4) due process was violated by the purported reliance

on the misdemeanor conviction to revoke his parole; 5) revocation

of parole was illegal because Parker had not been convicted of a

subsequent felony; 6) Parker’s detention prior to the revocation

hearing violated due process; 7) the district court erred in its

findings of fact and conclusions of law; 8) Parker’s parole

revocation and continued confinement violate double jeopardy;

9) Parker’s parole revocation and continued confinement are ex

post facto violations; and 10) the district court and the

respondent erred by viewing Parker’s thirteen grounds as raising

only nine grounds.

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate

record. For essentially the same reasons adopted by the district

court in its order of dismissal, we conclude Parker has failed to

raise a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See Parker v. Director,

TDCJ-PD, No. 6:95cv264 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 1996). The appeal is

without arguable merit and is therefore frivolous. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. The appeal is DISMISSED.

Parker has been warned by this court of the consequences of

bringing frivolous appeals. See Parker v. Highland Ins., No. 96-

20118 (5th Cir. Apr. 16, 1996) (unpublished). The warning has

gone unheeded. Accordingly, Parker is BARRED from filing any pro
3

se, in forma pauperis (IFP), civil appeal in this court, or any

pro se, IFP, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject

to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written

permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court

and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are

directed to return to Parker, unfiled, any attempted submission

inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                                RELEASE OF CLAIMS

         Each of the undersigned hereby releases, discharges and acquits forever
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and its officers, directors, trustees, agents, employees
and counsel (in each case, past, present or future) from any and all Claims
existing as of the date hereof (or the date of actual execution hereof by the
applicable person or entity, if later). As used herein, the term "Claim" shall
mean any and all liabilities, claims, defenses, demands, actions, causes of
action, judgments, deficiencies, interest, liens, costs or expenses (including
court costs, penalties, attorneys' fees and disbursements and amounts paid in
settlement) of any kind and character whatsoever, including claims for usury,
breach of contract, breach of commitment, negligent misrepresentation or failure
to act in good faith, in each case whether now known or unknown, suspected or
unsuspected, asserted or unasserted or primary or contingent, and whether
arising out of written documents, unwritten undertakings, course of conduct,
tort, violations of laws or regulations or otherwise.

         EXECUTED this 24th day of June, 2002.

                                 EVANS SYSTEMS, INC., a Texas corporation, WAY
                                 ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
                                 DIAMOND MINI MART, INC., a Texas corporation,
                                 EVANS OIL COMPANY, INC., a Texas corporation,
                                 IN & OUT MINI MART, INC., a Texas corporation,
                                 EDCO, INC., a Texas corporation, EDCO
                                 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Texas
                                 corporation, and EVANS OIL OF LOUISIANA, INC.,
                                 a Louisiana corporation

                                 By:
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    J. L. Evans, Sr.,
                                    President


                                --------------------------------------
                                J.L. EVANS, SR.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 39

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble

3 in the Hall of the House of Representatives on Tuesday,

4 January 23, 1996, at 9 p.m., for the purpose of receiving

5 such communication as the President of the United States

6 shall be pleased to make to them.

Passed the Senate January 22, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 39

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for the ‘‘State of the Union’’ address by

the President of the United States.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Susquehanna River Basin Commission

# AGENCY:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice lists the minor modifications approved for a previously approved project by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in                         **DATES**                        .                    

# DATES:

February 1-28, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *joyler@srbc.net.*                         Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above address.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice lists previously approved projects, receiving approval of minor modifications, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 2015-06 for the time period specified above:

## Minor Modification Issued Under 18 CFR 806.18

1. Brymac, Inc.—Mountain View Country Club, Docket No. 20211212, Harris Township, Centre County, Pa.; modification approval to add the University Area Joint Authority as an additional source of water for consumptive use; Approval Date: February 7, 2022.

*Authority:*                     Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509                     *et seq.,*18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.                

Dated: March 9, 2022.

Jason E. Oyler,

General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-05364 Filed 3-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6375 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6375

 To provide for consideration of the extension under the Energy Policy 
     and Conservation Act of nonapplication of No-Load Mode energy 
   efficiency standards to certain security or life safety alarms or 
                         surveillance systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2016

 Mr. Pompeo (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for consideration of the extension under the Energy Policy 
     and Conservation Act of nonapplication of No-Load Mode energy 
   efficiency standards to certain security or life safety alarms or 
                         surveillance systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Power And Security Systems (PASS) 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF NONAPPLICATION OF NO-LOAD MODE ENERGY EFFICIENCY 
              STANDARD TO CERTAIN SECURITY OR LIFE SAFETY ALARM OR 
              SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS.

    (a) Section 325(u)(3)(D)(ii) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 
Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(D)(ii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2021''; and
            (2) by striking ``2017'' and inserting ``2023''.
    (b) Section 325(u)(3)(E) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act 
(42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(3)(E)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``July 1, 2017,'' and 
        inserting ``the effective date of the amendment under 
        subparagraph (D)(ii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) Treatment in rule.--In the rule 
                        under subparagraph (D)(ii) and subsequent 
                        amendments the Secretary may treat some or all 
                        external power supplies designed to be 
                        connected to a security or life safety alarm or 
                        surveillance system as a separate product class 
                        or may extend the nonapplication under clause 
                        (ii).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO9 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
November 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee,
does hereby  certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects  throughout such period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has
     duly executed this Certificate this 26th day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0214 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32004D0214

**2004/214/EC: Commission Decision of 3 March 2004 amending Decision 2000/40/EC as regards the period of validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2004) 310) **

*
Official Journal L 067 , 05/03/2004 P. 0023 - 0023 *

Commission Decision

of 3 March 2004

amending Decision 2000/40/EC as regards the period of validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators

(notified under document number C(2004) 310)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2004/214/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community eco-label award scheme(1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 6(1) thereof,

After consulting the European Union Eco-labelling Board,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides for the award of an eco-label to a product possessing characteristics, which enable it to contribute significantly to improvements in relation to key environmental aspects and provides that specific eco-label criteria are to be established according to product groups.

(2) Commission Decision 2000/40/EC of 16 December 1999 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to refrigerators(2) will expire on 1 December 2003.

(3) Following the review of that Decision in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, it is appropriate to prolong the period of validity of those ecological criteria for a period of 12 months, in particular to allow those companies that have been awarded the eco-label to continue using the eco-label at least until the revision of Decision 2000/40/EC is completed.

(4) Decision 2000/40/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee set up under Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 3 of Decision 2000/40/EC is replaced by the following:

"Article 3

The product group definition and the criteria for the product group shall be valid until 1 December 2004. If, however, by that date a new decision establishing the product group definition and the criteria for this product group has not yet been adopted, that period of validity shall end either on 1 December 2005 or on the date of adoption of the new decision, whichever is sooner."

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2004.

For the Commission

Margot Wallström

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 237, 21.9.2000, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p. 22.
EX-34 (h)
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria
1122(1)(iii) and 1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable
to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The
Platform consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by
management in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 8, 2007
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toLong Beach Securities Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  November 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer,  DeutscheBank National Trust Company, as Trustee, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware, as Delaware Trustee, the following with respect to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-10 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

                                                                       

                                                                         /s/H. John Berens
| __________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-40967 

Conference Calendar

 

GILBERT HORRICE, Jr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL D. HALL, Warden; 

KELLY J. DIXON;

ROBERT A. BUCKLEY, Lieutenant; 

JOSEPH D. LANG, SR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-560

- - - - - - - - - -

April 17, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, & DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gilbert Horrice, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal

without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action against prison officials Michael D. Hall,

Warden; Kelly J. Dixon; Robert A. Buckley, Lieutenant; and Joseph

D. Lang, Sr. Horrice alleged that the defendants confiscated and

destroyed his personal property in violation of his Fourteenth

Amendment right to due process. Texas provides an adequate post-
No. 95-40967

-2-

deprivation remedy for the negligent or intentional deprivation

of property by state officials. Murphy v. Collins, 26 F.3d 541,

543-44 (5th Cir. 1994). 

This appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

dismissed. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Horrice that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Horrice is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0761 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0761

**2002/761/EC: Council Decision of 22 July 2002 concerning the conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part **

*
Official Journal L 262 , 30/09/2002 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Council Decision

of 22 July 2002

concerning the conclusion of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part

(2002/761/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) Pending the entry into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, signed on behalf of the Community, in Luxembourg on 17 June 2002, it is necessary to approve the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon of the other part.

(2) The Interim Agreement will replace relevant parts of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Lebanon(1) and the Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and Lebanon(2), signed in Brussels on 3 May 1997.

(3) The Interim Agreement should therefore be approved on behalf of the Community,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. The Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, the Annexes and Protocols to the Agreement, as well as the joint declarations and the declarations by the European Community included in the Final Act, are hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

2. The texts mentioned in paragraph 1 are attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to proceed, on behalf of the Community, to deposit the act of notification envisaged by Article 42(2) of the Agreement.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2002.

For the Council

The President

P. S. Møller

(1) OJ L 267, 27.9.1978, p. 2.

(2) OJ L 316, 12.12.1979, p. 24.