alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Joseph R. Rozelle, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Juniper Growth Corporation;



2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  February 15, 2010



/s/    Joseph R. Rozelle

------------------------------------

Joseph R. Rozelle

Principal Executive Officer

and Principal Financial Officer
# L_2007164DE.01003601.xml

| 26.6.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 164/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 164/36

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2003/369/EG der Kommission vom 16. Mai 2003 zur Änderung der Entscheidung 85/377/EWG zur Errichtung eines gemeinschaftlichen Klassifizierungssystems der landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 127 vom 23. Mai 2003
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 127 vom 23. Mai 2003

Seite 51, Anhang: Die letzte Spalte sechste Reihe der Tabelle erhält folgende Fassung:

„P1 > 2/3;

P11 + P12 + D/9 + D/22 ≤ 2/3“.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Destin WHITMORE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-11753 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(November 13, 2017)

Mary Louise Webb, Lawrence R. Som-merfeld, U.S. Attorney Service—Northern District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before WILSON, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Leigh Ann Webster, appointed counsel for Destín Whitmore in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Whit-more’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
#### Pamela Kay SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Colin HAYES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35682

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 ***

Filed November 22, 2017

Pamela Kay Scott, Pro Se

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pamela Kay Scott appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging claims relating to her criminal sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to proceed IFP, and de novo a determination that a complaint lacks arguable substance in law or fact. *Tripati v. First Nat'l Bank & Tr.,*821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed the claims against the prosecutor defendants on the basis of prosecutorial immunity. *See id.*at 1370 (district court may deny leave to proceed IFP “at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); *see also Cousins v. Lockyer,*568 F.3d 1063, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 2009) (explaining prosecutorial immunity).

However, the district court did not expressly consider Scott’s claims that defendants from the Washington Department of Corrections were responsible for incorrect ly recommending that Scott’s sentence should be extended, nor did it consider whether leave to amend these claims would be appropriate. *See Cousins,*568 F.3d at 1069-70 (discussing the constitutional right to be free from wrongful incarceration, and whether corrections officials were entitled to qualified immunity); *see also Rodriguez v. Steck,*795 F.3d 1187, 1188 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[A] district court’s denial of leave to proceed in forma pauper-is is an abuse of discretion unless the district court first provides a plaintiff leave to amend the complaint or finds that amendment would be futile.”). We vacate the denial of 'leave to proceed IFP, vacate in part the order filed on October 5, 2017 dismissing plaintiffs action, and remand for further proceedings as to these defendants only.

*629Scott’s motion to file a substitute or corrected brief (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted. The Clerk shall file the opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No, 13 and strike the opening brief filed at Docket Entry No. 7,

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 74

To provide for a change in the enrollment of H.R. 3539.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. BROWN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was ordered

to lie over, under the rule

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To provide for a change in the enrollment of H.R. 3539.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the action of the Acting President pro

3 tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of

4 Representatives in signing the bill (H.R. 3539) to amend

5 title 49, United States Code, to reauthorize programs of

6 the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other pur7 poses, is rescinded and the Clerk of the House of Rep8 resentatives shall, in the reenrollment of such bill, add the

9 following section at the end of title XII:

10 ‘‘SEC. 12ll. CONSTRUCTION OF RUNWAYS.

11 ‘‘Notwithstanding section 332 of the Department of

12 Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2

•SCON 74 IS

1 1996 (109 Stat. 457), or any other provision of law that

2 specifically restricts the number of runways at a single

3 international airport, the Secretary of Transportation may

4 obligate funds under chapters 471 and 481 of title 49,

5 United States Code, for any project to construct a new

6 runway at such airport, unless this section is expressly re7 pealed.’’.

Æ
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S CHIEF JUSTICE BONNIE SUDDERTH
JUSTICES ELIZABETH KERR J. WADE BIRDWELL DABNEY BASSEL DANA WOMACK MIKE WALLACH BRIAN WALKER TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER 401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211 TEL: (817) 884-1900 FAX: (817) 884-1932 www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK DEBRA SPISAK
CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY LISA M. WEST
GENERAL COUNSEL CLARISSA HODGES
June 23, 2021 Hon. Brody Young Shanklin Judge, 211th District Court Denton County Courts Bldg. 1450 E. McKinney St., Ste. 2325 Denton, TX 76209 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Criminal District Clerk, Denton County P.O. Box 2146 Denton, TX 76202-2146 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Kristin R. Brown The Law Office of Kristin R. Brown, PLLC 17304 Preston Rd Ste 1250 Dallas, TX 75252-4632 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Hon. David L. Evans Regional Presiding Judge Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building 100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor Fort Worth, TX 76196 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Andrea Simmons Asst. Criminal District Attorney 1450 E. McKinney, Ste. 3100 Denton, TX 76202 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-19-00366-CR, 02-19-00367-CR Trial Court Case Number: F17-2556-211, F19-1660-211 Style: David Larson, Jr.
v. The State of Texas Today the Second Court of Appeals corrected a page in the opinion issued on June 17, 2021 in the above-referenced cause.02-19-00366-CR

June 23, 2021 Page 2 Page 4 is to be substituted for the original page 4 of the opinion in the above referenced cause. The page contains no substantive changes affecting the result of the opinion. The opinion with the corrected page can be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

. Respectfully yours, DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7078 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the misrepresentation 

and receipt of a false obligation to the Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. BUCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the misrepresentation and receipt of a false obligation to the 

Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘False Claims Enhance5 ment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FALSE CLAIMS ACT. 

7 Section 3729(a)(1) of title 31, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7078 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (G), by striking the 

2 comma, and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(H) knowingly misrepresents to another 

5 an obligation to pay or transmit duty payments 

6 to the Government and improperly receives such 

7 payment or transmission of duty payments 

8 without paying or transmitting such duty pay9 ments to the Government,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### MARX & KEMPNER *v.*CALDWELL et. al.

IN COURT OF APPEALS,

AUSTIN TERM, 1884.

*Practice*— Statement *of Facts,*— Where it appears that the statement of facts was filed after the adjournment of the court, and no order is found in the record allowing it to be so filed, it will not be considered by this court.

*Charge.*— In the absence of a statement of facts, the charge of the court will not be revised, unless clearly wrong under any state of the case.

Appeal from Young county.

Finley & Holman, for appellants.

Arnold & Glasgow, for appellees.

Willie, C. J.:

The term of the court at which this cause was tried adjourned on the 8th day of November, 1883. The statement of facts was made out, signed and filed on the 10th day of the same month.

There was no order of court made, so far as the transcript shows, allowing the statement of facts to be filed after the adjournment of court for the term. Under frequent decisions of this court firmly settling the practice on that subject in accordance with the provisions of the Revised Statutes, the statement of facts can not be taken into consideration. All the assignments of error refer to the charge of the court, and these can not be revised without a statement of facts, unless they were so clearly against law as to be erroneous under any state of case that could possibly arise under the pleadings of the parties. Bo far from this being the case in the present instance, the charge seems a pretty fair exposition of the law upon the questions of which it treats, and in the state of the record, as we are authorized to consider it, shows no error for which *298the judgment below should be reversed. It is therefore affirmed. See Ross v. McGown, 58 Texas, 603; R. R. Co. v. McAllister, 59 Texas, 349; Lanier v. Perryman, 59 Texas, 105.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--SIP22-007, COVID-19 and Women: An 
Assessment of Challenges and Lessons Learned to Enhance Public Health 
Emergency Preparedness for Women and Families.
    Date: May 11, 2022
    Time: 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Jaya Raman, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and 
Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S107-B, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6511, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#733921121e121d331017105d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="115b43707c707f517275723f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-05431 Filed 3-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Joseph
L. Sullivan, certify that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofCE
      Casecnan Water and Energy Company,
      Inc.;2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 /s/
Joseph L. Sullivan
 Joseph L.
Sullivan
 President
 (chief
executive officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrea Joy JAMES, a/k/a Dee, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7240

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 21, 2017

Decided: December 28, 2017

Andrea Joy James, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*197Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andrea Joy James seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). "When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe James’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

> (1) newly discovered evidence that ... would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or

> (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to eases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). James’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*