Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2022 / Notices 15371 

1See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 55584 (October 6, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 55585. 

Vietnam Day 2 .......................................................................... • Morning: possible second day of one-on-one meetings at hotel and/or visit 

to local medical device association. 

Thursday, September 22 .......................................................... Travel to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 

Malaysia Day 1 ......................................................................... • Meeting with the Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia: 

—Welcome remarks on the Malaysian healthcare system and non-communicable diseases by MOH. 

Friday, September 23 ............................................................... • Delegate to present U.S. solutions. 

• Meeting with Malaysia Medical Device Association (MMDA)/Association of 

Malaysian Medical Industries (AMMI). 

• U.S. Embassy Malaysia briefing—Political, Economic, Commercial climate/ 

context. 

• Additional meeting(s) and/or one-on-one meetings with Malaysian 

healthcare industry and stakeholders, as well as potential partners/distributors. 

• Networking reception at Chief of Mission Residence/hotel and meet with 

invitees from Malaysian government and healthcare industry and U.S. Embassy officers. 

Malaysia Day 2 ......................................................................... • Depart Malaysia. 

Saturday, September 24.

Participation Requirements 

All parties interested in participating 

in the trade mission must complete and 

submit an application package for 

consideration by the DOC. All 

applicants will be evaluated on their 

ability to meet certain conditions and 

best satisfy the selection criteria as 

outlined below. A minimum of 12 and 

maximum of 15 firms and/or trade 

associations will be selected to 

participate in the mission from the 

applicant pool. 

Fees and Expenses 

After a firm or trade association has 

been selected to participate on the 

mission, a payment to the Department of 

Commerce in the form of a participation 

fee is required. The participation fee for 

the Healthcare Business Development 

Mission will be $5,300 for small or 

medium-sized enterprises (SME) 1; and 

$6,200 for large firms or trade 

associations. The fee for each additional 

firm representative (large firm or SME/ 

trade organization) is $500. 

Timeframe for Recruitment and 

Application 

Mission recruitment will be 

conducted in an open and public 

manner, including publication in the 

Federal Register, posting on the 

Commerce Department trade mission 

calendar (http://export.gov/ 

trademissions) and other internet 

websites, press releases to general and 

trade media, direct mail, notices by 

industry trade associations and other 

multiplier groups, and publicity at 

industry meetings, symposia, 

conferences, and trade shows. 

Recruitment for the mission will begin 

immediately and conclude no later than 

June 30, 2022. The U.S. Department of 

Commerce will review applications and 

inform applicants of selection decisions 

on a comparative basis. Applications 

received after June 30, 2022 will be 

considered only if space and scheduling 

constraints permit. 

Contacts 

Lisa Huot, Senior International Trade 

Specialist, Office of Health and 

Information Technologies, 

Washington, DC, Ph: 202–482–2796, 

lisa.huot@trade.gov 

Miguel Olivares, Senior International 

Trade Specialist, Export Assistance 

Center, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, Ph: 

954–356–6649, Miguel.Olivares@

trade.gov 

Krista Barry, Vietnam and Malaysia 

Desk Officer, Global Markets Asia, 

Washington, DC, Ph: 202–389–2298, 

Krista.Barry@trade.gov 

Thailand/ASEAN Region 

John Breidenstine, ASEAN Regional 

Senior Commercial Officer, Bangkok, 

Thailand, p.+6622055280, 

john.breidenstine@trade.gov 

Charles Phillips, Deputy Senior 

Commercial Officer, Bangkok, 

Thailand, p. +66–2205–5263, 

charles.phillips@trade.gov 

Vietnam 

Stephen Jacques, Acting Senior 

Commercial Officer, The U.S. 

Commercial Service, U.S. Embassy, 

Hanoi, Vietnam, Ph: +(84) 090–319– 

6788, Stephen.Jacques@trade.gov 

Malaysia 

Francis Peters, Senior Commercial 

Officer, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Ph: 

+60 1 2383–2030, Francis.Peters@

trade.gov 

Dated: March 14, 2022. 

Gemal Brangman, 

Director, ITA Events Management Task Force. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05707 Filed 3–17–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–881] 

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

cold-rolled steel flat products (coldrolled steel) from the Republic of Korea 

were not sold in the United States at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), September 1, 

2019, through August 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 18, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Preston Cox, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–5041, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 6, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register.1 We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results.2 This administrative review 

covers two mandatory respondents: 

Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai) and 

POSCO/POSCO International 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
15372 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2022 / Notices 

3Commerce continues to treat POSCO and 

POSCO International Corporation as a collapsed 

single entity for the final results of this review. See 

Preliminary Results PDM at 1; see also Certain 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic 

of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 40808 

(July 29, 2021), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at 6 n.16. 

4See Hyundai’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Cold Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Hyundai 

Steel’s Case Brief,’’ dated November 5, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Extension 

of Deadline for Final Results of 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 1, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic 

of Korea; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Brazil, India, the Republic of Korea, and the United 

Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determinations for Brazil and the United Kingdom 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 64432 

(September 20, 2016) (Order). 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 2–5. 

9See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle). 

10See Appendix II for a full list of the nonselected companies. 

11See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Corporation (PIC) (collectively, POSCO/ 

PIC).3 This administrative review also 

covers 38 producers and/or exporters of 

subject merchandise. The list of 

producers/exporters not selected for 

individual examination is attached as 

Appendix II to this notice. 

On November 5, 2021, Hyundai 

submitted a case brief.4 No other party 

submitted case or rebuttal briefs. On 

February 1, 2022, we extended the 

deadline for these final results to no 

later than March 18, 2022.5 For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the Preliminary Results, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 7

The product covered by the Order is 

cold-rolled steel from the Republic of 

Korea. For a complete description of the 

scope of this administrative review, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case brief filed 

by Hyundai, an interested party in this 

review, are discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues which Hyundai raised, and to 

which we responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, is attached as 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we made certain changes to the margin 

calculation for Hyundai. For a complete 

discussion of these changes, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

weighted-average dumping margin to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually examined, excluding any 

margins that are zero, de minimis (i.e., 

less than 0.5 percent), or determined 

entirely on the basis of facts available. 

Consistent with our practice and 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, for the 

companies that were not selected for 

individual review, we assigned a rate 

based on the rates of the respondents 

that were selected for individual 

examination. Consistent with the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit’s decision in Albemarle, we are 

assigning to the 38 companies not 

selected for individual examination the 

zero percent rates calculated for the 

mandatory respondents, Hyundai and 

POSCO/PIC.9 These are the only rates 

determined in this review for individual 

respondents and, thus, we determine 

that they apply to the 38 firms not 

selected for individual examination 

under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

For these final results, we determine 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

September 1, 2019, through August 31, 

2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 0.00 

POSCO/POSCO International 

Corporation ............................. 0.00 

Non-Selected Companies 10 ....... 0.00 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results to parties within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

the respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is either zero or de 

minimis, we intend to instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Because the weighted-average dumping 

margins for Hyundai, POSCO/PIC, and 

the 38 firms not selected for individual 

examination have been determined to be 

zero percent, we intend to instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

practice, for entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Hyundai or POSCO/PIC for which it 

did not know its merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

company-specific rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.11


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2022 / Notices 15373 

12See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

13See Order. 

1See Sodium Nitrite from India and the Russian 

Federation: Initiation of Countervailing Duty 

Investigations, 87 FR 7108 (February 8, 2022). 

Consistent with its recent notice,12

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). The final results of this 

administrative review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise under 

review and for future cash deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of these final results for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be the rates established 

in the final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation but the producer has been 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

this proceeding, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 20.33 percent, the 

all-others rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 11, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

VI. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Correction of Clerical Errors 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Individually Examined 

1. AJU Steel Co., Ltd. 

2. Ameri-Source Korea 

3. Dai Yang Metal Co., Ltd. 

4. DCM Corporation 

5. DK GNS Co., Ltd. 

6. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd 

7. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. 

8. Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. 

9. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

10. GS Global Corporation 

11. Hanawell Co., Ltd. 

12. Hankum Co., Ltd. 

13. Hwashin Co. Ltd. 

14. Hyosung TNC Corporation 

15. Hyundai Corporation 

16. JMP Co., Ltd. 

17. KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. 

18. Korinox Co., Ltd. 

19. Mikwang Precision Manufacture Co., Ltd. 

20. Okaya Korea Co., Ltd. 

21. POSCO Coated and Colored Steel Co., 

Ltd. 

22. Samhwan Steel Co., Ltd. 

23. Samsung C & T Corporation 

24. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 

25. Samsung STS Co., Ltd. 

26. SeAH Changwon Integrated Special Steel 

Corporation 

27. SeAH Coated Metal Corporation 

28. SeAH Steel Corporation 

29. Shin Steel Co., Ltd. 

30. Shin Young Co., Ltd. 

31. Signode Korea Inc. 

32. SK Networks Co., Ltd. 

33. Soon Hong Trading Co., Ltd. 

34. Sungjin Co., Ltd. 

35. Taesan Corporation 

36. TCC Steel Corporation 

37. TI Automotive Ltd. 

38. Wolverine Korea Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05692 Filed 3–17–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–907] 

Sodium Nitrite From India: 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable March 18, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eva 

Kim, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–8283. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 8, 2022, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) published the 

initiation of countervailing duty (CVD) 

investigations of imports of sodium 

nitrite from India and Russia.1

Currently, the preliminary 

determinations are due no later than 

April 8, 2022. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in a countervailing duty 

investigation within 65 days after the 

date on which Commerce initiated the 

investigation. However, section 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1