alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
            31.1
 Certification
            of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function
 of
            the
            Servicer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
            2002







**SERVICER
      CERTIFICATION**






I,
      Steven
      R. Lambert, certify that:




1.           I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
      10-K of Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2006-A (the “Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports”);




2.           Based
      on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;




3.           Based
      on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
      required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
      is
      included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I
      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer and based
      on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the Servicer
      compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
      AB,
      and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Servicer
      has
      fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement (as defined in the
      related Indenture), as amended, in all material respects; and




5.           All
      of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
      of
      compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
      be
      included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
      Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
      instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
      this
      report on Form 10-K.




In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated party:  U.S. Bank National
      Association.




Date:        December
      7, 2007 as of June 29, 2007




By:/s/ Steven R.
      Lambert


Steven
      R.
      Lambert


President
      and Chief
      Executive Officer of


Nissan
      Motor
      Acceptance Corporation


(senior
      officer in charge
      of the


servicing
      function)













31
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 22

  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
              participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, Portugal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               July 28, (legislative day, July 10), 1995

   Mr. Pell submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should 
              participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, Portugal.
Whereas there was international concern expressed at the Rio Conference of 1992 
        about conservation of the seas;
Whereas 1998 has been declared the ``International Year of the Ocean'' by the 
        United Nations in an effort to alert the world to the need for improving 
        the physical and cultural assets offered by the world's oceans;
Whereas the theme of Expo '98 is ``The Oceans, a Heritage for the Future'';
Whereas Expo '98 has a fundamental aim of alerting political, economic, and 
        public opinion to the growing importance of the world's oceans;
Whereas Portugal has established a vast network of relationships through ocean 
        exploration;
Whereas Portugal's history is rich with examples of the courage and exploits of 
        Portuguese explorers;
Whereas Portugal and the United States have a relationship based on mutual 
        respect, and a sharing of interests and ideals, particularly the deeply 
        held commitment to democratic values;
Whereas today over 2,000,000 Americans can trace their ancestry to Portugal; and
Whereas the United States and Portugal agreed in the 1995 Agreement on 
        Cooperation and Defense that in 1998 the 2 countries would consider and 
        develop appropriate means of commemorating the upcoming quincentennial 
        anniversary of the historic voyage of discovery by Vasco da Gama: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the United States should fully participate in Expo '98 in Lisbon, 
Portugal, and encourage the private sector to support this worthwhile 
undertaking.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.36

                                  RESOLUTION
                       DAWSON PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
                          BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
                                AUGUST 7, 1998


      RESOLVED THAT, effective this date, the Board hereby approves and adopts
the following amendment to its Rights Agreement, dated as of September 11, 1997,
between the Corporation and Harris Trust Company of New York as Rights Agent:

      Section 3(a)(ii) of the Rights Agreement is amended to read as follows:

            "(ii) such date, if any, after the date of commencement or public
      announcement of a tender offer or exchange offer by any Person (other than
      an Exempt Person), the consummation of which would result in any Person
      becoming the Beneficial Owner of Common Stock aggregating 15% or more of
      the then outstanding shares of Common Stock, as is subsequently determined
      by resolution of the Board of Directors . . ."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          27,645
<SECURITIES>                                    12,270
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,403<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      3,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,915
<PP&E>                                         428,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 516,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,008
<BONDS>                                        358,586
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   516,943
<SALES>                                         11,945<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               345,644
<CGS>                                           13,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    787
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,997
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>Notes and accounts receivable-trade are reported net of allowances for 
    doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Condensed Balance sheet.

<F2>Net sales are reported net of promotional allowances applicable to tangible
    items.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
T heHonorable Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2436

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Tyrus Gillam, also known as Tyrus * Gilliam, * [Unpublished] * Appellant, *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1997 Filed: October 14, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Follo wing multiple drug transactions with an undercover police investigator , Tyrus Gillam pleaded guilty to two counts of distributing crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). The district c ourt sentenced him to 46 months imprisonment and 1 four years supervised release. On appeal Gillam challenges his sentence and alleges he suffered sentence manipulation because the undercover investigator, Willi e Robinson, entered into repeated transactions with him, requested cocaine base as-2-

op posedto powder cocaine, and referred his case for federal rather than stat e prosecution. We affirm. Robinson testified at sente ncing that he made repeated purchases in an effort to reach Gil lam & s drug source; that he purchased cocaine base from Gillam, because the dealer who had introduced Gillam to him--Joe Tims--was a crack cocaine dealer and Gillamnev er brought Robinson powder cocaine; and that an explanation existed fo r why Tims was prosecuted in state court. Based on this and other evidence in th e record, we find no merit in Gillam & s challenge to his sentence. See United States v
. St avig , 80 F.3d 1241, 1245 (8th Cir. 1996) (standard of review); United States v
. Shephard , 4 F.3d 64 7, 649 (8th Cir. 1993) (discussing sentencing manipulation), cert. denied , 510 U. S. 1203 (1994) ; United States v. Frondle , 918 F.2d 62, 64-65 (8th Cir. 1990) (d istrict court is entitled to credit witnesses & testimony at sentencing), cert . denied , 499 U.S. 941 (1991). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6258 

To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of the 

department in which the Coast Guard is operating to enter into certain 

contracts for the acquisition of vessels for the Coast Guard, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 

Mr. HUNTER (for himself and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard 

is operating to enter into certain contracts for the acquisition of vessels for the Coast Guard, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coast Guard Acquisi5 tion Improvement Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6258 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTRACTING AUTHORITY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 15 of 

3 title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following: 

5 ‘‘§ 578. Contracting authority 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into 

7 contracts described in subsection (b) for the acquisition 

8 for the Coast Guard of no less than— 

9 ‘‘(1) three heavy polar icebreakers; 

10 ‘‘(2) three medium polar icebreakers; 

11 ‘‘(3) four Offshore Patrol Cutters; and 

12 ‘‘(4) five Fast Response Cutters. 

13 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZED METHODS.—Contracts referred to 

14 in subsection (a) are the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) Block buys. 

16 ‘‘(2) Leases. 

17 ‘‘(3) Combined purchases, also known as eco18 nomic order quantity purchases, of— 

19 ‘‘(A) materials and components; and 

20 ‘‘(B) long lead time materials. 

21 ‘‘(4) Advance construction funding. 

22 ‘‘(5) Multiyear contracts entered into in accord23 ance with section 2306b of title 10.’’. 

24 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 223 of the 

25 Howard Coble Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation 

26 Act of 2014 (14 U.S.C. 577 note) is repealed. 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6258 IH

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis at the be2 ginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end 

3 of the items relating to such subchapter the following: 

‘‘578. Contracting authority.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 

### Werner, Christopher Subject: Feb. 25 Interagency call with OMB and other Federal agencies on Regional Haze Rule Revisions Location: RTP-C400A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C
Start: Thu 2/25/2016 2:00 PM End: Thu 2/25/2016 3:00 PM
Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: Werner, Christopher Required Attendees: Jones, Rhea; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov; Wood, Anna; Smith, Kristi Resources: RTP-C400A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C400C-Max20/RTP-Bld g-C; RTP-OAQPSC435I/RTP-OAQPS-BLDG-C Categories: Regional Haze



### Materials attached.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Graphics Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph Vecchiolla, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                 /s/ JOSEPH VECCHIOLLA
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    Joseph Vecchiolla
                                          President and Chief Operating Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

August 14, 2003
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LUIS G. MONTOYA

, Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1472

[ March 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE13008112

.

Lou is G. Montoya, Weston, pro se.

Kimberly S. Mello of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Steven SEPLOWIN, Individually and as an Assignee of American Realty LLC dba American Realty Pros, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZILLOW, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35961

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017 *

Filed June 30, 2017

Steven Seplowin, Pro Se

Andrew Escobar, Stellman Keehnel, DLA Piper US, LLP, Seattle, WA, Joseph Anton Roselius, DLA Piper US, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee

*902Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Seplowin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims in connection with Zillow, Ine.’s discontinuation of an online real estate sale and rental service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal for failure to state a claim. *Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc.,*813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Seplowin’s action because Seplowin failed to allege any causes of action personal to him. *See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States,*818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (“Although a non-attorney may appear in propria persona in his own behalf, that privilege is personal to him. He has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.” (citation omitted)).

We do not consider Seplowin’s argument raised for the first time on appeal that Seplowin, rather than American Realty LLC, contracted with Zillow, Inc. *See Raich v. Gonzales,*500 F.3d 850, 868 (9th Cir. 2007) (court generally will not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal).

We lack jurisdiction to review the order of the Northern District of Illinois transferring this action to the Western District of Washington. *See Posnanski v. Gibney,*421 F.3d 977, 980 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[W]e may not review a transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 by a district court outside of our circuit to a district court within our circuit.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John F. Olmstead, President and Director of CAI Equipment Leasing
V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:      /s/John F. Olmstead                                 Dated: May 16, 2005
         -------------------
         John F. Olmstead
Title:   President and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
                                        
                       HEALTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  1997               1996
                                              --------------     --------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>

Net loss                                      $  (1,153,989)     $  (1,090,089)
                                              --------------     --------------
                                              --------------     --------------
Weighted average common and equivalent shares 
   outstanding                                    6,534,621          6,436,372
                                              --------------     --------------
                                              --------------     --------------
Net income (loss) per common and common 
   equivalent share                           $       (0.18)     $       (0.17)
                                              --------------     --------------
                                              --------------     --------------

</TABLE>

                                        11
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 4 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 4

   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a Federal 
                            balanced budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Thurmond introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to a Federal 
                            balanced budget.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution if 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after its submission to the States for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays of the United States for any fiscal year 
shall not exceed total receipts to the United States for that year, 
unless three-fifths of the whole number of both Houses of Congress 
shall provide for a specific excess of outlays over receipts.
    ``Section 2. Any bill for raising taxes shall become law only if 
approved by a majority of the whole number of both Houses of Congress 
by rollcall vote.
    ``Section 3. The Congress may waive the provisions of this article 
for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in effect.
    ``Section 4. Total receipts shall include all receipts of the 
United States except those derived from borrowing. Total outlays shall 
include all outlays of the United States except for those for repayment 
of debt principal.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect beginning with fiscal 
year 2002 or with the second fiscal year beginning after the 
ratification, whichever is later.''.
                                 <all>
```