alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (b)
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 8, 2007

RE: ACE 2006-SD3

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1.   A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
     and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
     of October 31, 2006 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my
     supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
     its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
     Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name:  Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
#### Fernando Palma CARIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donnie HARRISON, Sheriff; E. A. Blomgren, Investigator; James Michael Cornaire, Deputy Sheriff; Drug Enforcement Agency Director; United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency Director; Christopher Brant; Tom Halvas; Eric Holder; Unidentified Indemnitor for Wake County; William Atwell; Lance Anthony; Michael Williams; D. Taylor; K. Manning, Defendants-Appellees, and United States of America, Party-in-Interest-Appellee, and Dwight Yokum; Nardine Mary Guirguis; Drug Enforcement Administration, Defendants.

No. 17-6490

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: December 4, 2017

*182Fernando Palma Carias, Appellant Pro Se. Roger Allen Askew, John Albert Maxfield, Virginia Claire Tharrington, WAKE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Rudy E. Renter, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert Edward Nunley, NUNLEY *&*ASSOCIATES, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Walter A. Schmidlin, III, STEWART & SCHMIDLIN, PLLC, Smithfield, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Fernando Palma Carias appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (2012); *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (2012); the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2012); and provisions of North Carolina state law.

We have reviewed the record in light of Carias’ arguments on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.**Carias v. Harrison,*Nos. 5:13-ct-03264-FL; 5:14-ct-3104-FL, 2016 WL 1171544, 2017 WL 1155749 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2016 & Mar. 27, 2017). We deny Carias’ motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 As to Carias’ Fourth Amendment claims regarding surveillance equipment in his vehicle, we conclude that Carias’ self-serving statements are insufficient to create genuine issues of material fact that must be submitted to the jury.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Benito MARTINEZ-IPINA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40382 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 16, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s *Office,*Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Benito Martinez-Ipina, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Benito Martinez-Ipina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ipina has submitted an untimely response challenging his conviction. Even if *407it were timely, because the record reflects that Martinez-Ipina knowingly decided not to appeal his conviction, we will not address the issues raised in his response. *See United States v. Polanco-Ozorto,*772 F.3d 1053, 1054-55 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 58

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to granting power to the States to propose constitutional amendments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Mr. ASHCROFT introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to granting power to the States to propose

constitutional amendments.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing is proposed as an amendment to Article V of the

5 Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to

6 all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 by the Congress:
2

•SJ 58 IS

1 ‘‘Whenever two-thirds of the several States shall pro2 pose an Amendment, in identical terms, to this Constitu3 tion, such proposal shall be submitted to the Congress for

4 consideration. If two-thirds of the Members of each House

5 of Congress do not disapprove the proposal during the ses6 sion in which the proposal is submitted, the proposal shall

7 be submitted to all of the States for consideration. Such

8 Amendment shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes as

9 part of the Constitution when ratified by the Legislatures

10 of three-fourths of the several States.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Action Acquisition Corporation
(the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Guangning
Xu,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                November
      22, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Guangning
      XuName:
      Guangning XuTitle:
      Chief Financial
Officer
 
 This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.8


Consent of Independent Public Accountants

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia
Vale do Rio Doce of our report dated January 21, 2000, relating to the
Financial Statements of Celulose Nipo-Brasileira S.A. - CENIBRA for the year
ended December 31, 1999, which is included in such Annual Report.


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Belo Oriente, Brazil, June 27, 2002
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00480

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF J.P.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- FAM

- 3668

- 5

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No co sts are assessed, due to appellant ’ s inability to pay costs

. We further order this decision certified below for obse rvance. March 2, 2023
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 26

Designating April 9, 1995, and April 9, 1996, as ‘‘National Former Prisoner

of War Recognition Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. SIMPSON (for himself, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. GRAHAM, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Designating April 9, 1995, and April 9, 1996, as ‘‘National

Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day’’.

Whereas the United States has fought in many wars;

Whereas thousands of members of the Armed Forces of the

United States who served in such wars were captured by

the enemy and held as prisoners of war;

Whereas many such prisoners of war were subjected to brutal

and inhumane treatment by their captors in violation of

international codes and customs for the treatment of

prisoners of war and died, or were disabled, as a result

of such treatment; and
2

•SJ 26 IS

Whereas the great sacrifices of such prisoners of war and

their families deserve national recognition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That April 9, 1995, and April 9, 1996, are designated as

4 ‘‘National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day’’ in

5 honor of the members of the Armed Forces of the United

6 States who have been held as prisoners of war, and the

7 President is authorized and requested to issue a procla8 mation calling upon the people of the United States to

9 commemorate such day with appropriate ceremonies and

10 activities.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tremell ARMSTEAD, also known as Mel Armstead, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-30439 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 18, 2017

*220Diane Hollenshead Copes, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin G. Boitmann, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Spiro G. Latsis, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Celia Clary Rhoads, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Tremell Armstead, federal prisoner # 31567-034, is serving a 180-month prison sentence for conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense levels in the drug quantity table of U.S.S.G. § 201.1(c).

In his sole issue *on*appeal, Armstead argues that the district court erred in determining that it was not authorized to consider a § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where the sentence was imposed pursuant to a binding plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) and not expressly tied to the Guidelines. Specifically, he asserts that this court’s adoption in *United States v. Benitez,*822 F.3d 807 (5th Cir. 2016), of Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in *Freeman v. United States,*564 U.S. 522, 131 S.Ct. 2685, 180 L.Ed.2d 519 (2011), “is erroneous because it misapplies the rule for determining the holding of a fractured Supreme Court opinion, and because the rule it adopts is itself erroneous.” Armstead acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, and he raises the issue to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0422

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JACK ELDON JARVEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including June 20, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 20 2021

05/20/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0422
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Giggles N’ Hugs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joey Parsi, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/S/ Joey ParsiJoey ParsiChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial OfficerAugust 10, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly 
period ended November 30, 1996, and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such document.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                            <C>
<CURRENCY>                           U.S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1
<CASH>                                    824,709
<SECURITIES>                            5,406,862
<RECEIVABLES>                          13,359,444
<ALLOWANCES>                            1,245,360
<INVENTORY>                               219,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       21,270,426
<PP&E>                                  5,052,025
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,200,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         27,293,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   8,503,516
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<COMMON>                                   64,772 
<OTHER-SE>                             18,790,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           27,293,752
<SALES>                                 7,701,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        7,701,927
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,510,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          775,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           338,772
<INCOME-TAX>                              127,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       211,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              211,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .03
        

</TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 11

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of a President pro

tempore of the United States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. FORD submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the House of Representatives of the election of

a President pro tempore of the United States Senate.

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives be noti2 fied of the election of the Honorable Strom Thurmond,

3 a Senator from the State of South Carolina, as President

4 pro tempore of the Senate.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-78-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 18--San Jose, California, Authorization 
of Production Activity Innovusion, Inc. (Light Detection and Ranging 
Systems), Sunnyvale, California

    On November 12, 2021, Innovusion, Inc., submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 18 in Sunnyvale, California.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 67022, November 24, 2021). On 
March 14, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: March 14, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05727 Filed 3-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Eastern	Atlantic	Consulting,	LLC

37	Bucks	Mill	Road

Colts	Neck,	NJ		07722

February	19,	2016

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE

Washington,	D.C.		20590

RE:		Section	333	Exemption

To	Whom	it	May	Concern:

I	am	writing on	behalf	of	my	company,	Eastern	Atlantic	Consulting,	LLC, to	request	

an	exemption	pursuant	to Section	333	of	the	FAA	Modernization	and	Reform	Act	of	

2012.		This	exemption	would	allow	us	to	operate	an	unmanned	aircraft	system	

(UAS)	for	commercial	purposes,	including	but	not	limited	to:	aerial	photography	and	

videography	of	real	estate,	special	events,	and	for	promotional	purposes.		This	

request	is	similar	to	many	previously	issued	exemptions,	including	numbers	13608,	

14781,	and	14816.

The	granting	of	this	exemption	would	be	of	great	benefit	to	the	public.		We	will	be	

offering	a	service	that	has	otherwise	not	been	offered,	or	has	been	offered	at	greater	

risk	and	cost.		Using	an	UAS	for	aerial	photography	is	much	safer	than	using	larger

aircraft	or	a	crane	to	achieve	the	same	result.		Additionally,	the	lower	fee	will	make	

it	more	affordable	and	therefore	more	accessible	to	the	general	public.

We	will	be	using	a	Blade	Chroma	CGO2 (UAS	Certificate	Number	FA37YTP9XT) with	

the	following	specifications:

Motor-to-Motor Distance:	15.7	in	(400mm)	

Rotor	Type:	Quadcopter	

Prop	Diameter:	10.2	in	(260mm)	

Approximate	Flight	Time:	30	minutes	

Battery:	11.1V	3S	5400mAh	Li-Po	

Height:	9.50	in	(242mm)	

Weight:	45.9	oz	(1.3	kg)	

Motor	Type:	4	×	780Kv	Brushless	Outrunner	

Control	Link:	2.4GHz	

Video	Link:	5.8GHz	

Video	Link	Range:	1,970	ft	(600m)	

Satellite	Navigation	System:	GPS,	GLONASS	

Completion	Level:	Ready-to-Fly
I	am	a	private	pilot	licensed	to	fly	under	visual	flight	rules.		I	have	been	flying	small	

aircraft	for	20	years.		I	am	familiar	with	FAA	Regulations and	will	follow	all	rules	

when	operating	the	UAS.		We	would	like	to	be	able	to	operate this	UAS	at	an	altitude	

under	400	feet,	and	at	a	speed	under	100	mph.		We	wish	to	operate	it	during	

daylight	hours	within	visual	line	of	sight.		We	will	ensure	proper	maintenance of	the	

UAS,	and	inspect	it	before	and	after	each	flight.		All	repairs	will	be	performed	by	a	

facility	authorized	by	the	manufacturer.		We	will	follow	all	safety	bulletins	issued	by	

the	manufacturer.

I	am	requesting	exemption	from	the	following	regulations:

14	CFR	61.23(a)	and	(c)

14	CFR	61.101(e)(4)	and	(5)

14	CFR	61.113(a)

14	CFR	61.315(a)

14	CFR	91.7	(a)

14	CFR	91.119(c)

14	CFR	91.121

14	CFR	151(a)(1)

14	CFR	91.405(a)

14	CFR	91.407(a)(1)

14	CFR	91.409(a)(1)	and	(2)

14	CFR	91.417(a)	and	(b)

If	you	need	any	additional	information,	please	contact	me	at	the	address	below.

Sincerely,

Michael	J.	Burke

Eastern	Atlantic	Consulting,	LLC

37	Bucks	Mill	Road

Colts	Neck,	NJ		07722

easternac@verizon.net