alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS OF AVTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF
JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH
FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,577
<PP&E>                                           1,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           113
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,626
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (717)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED OCTPBER 31,1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           22945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32845
<PP&E>                                            1218
<DEPRECIATION>                                     453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   44895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         36996
<OTHER-SE>                                        1636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     44895
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 20134
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    15434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2049
<INCOME-TAX>                                       801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1248
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1997 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001005698
<NAME>                        SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            227,342
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     175,146
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       164,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  567,117
<PP&E>                            665,575
<DEPRECIATION>                    134,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,215,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,052,449
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           36,950
<OTHER-SE>                        126,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,215,405
<SALES>                           467,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  541,054
<CGS>                           1,758,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,758,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,247,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  8,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (3,473,198)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (3,473,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (3,473,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.94)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7025 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7025

  To extend and authorize annual appropriations for the United States 
Commission on International Religious Freedom through fiscal year 2026.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2024

Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Bilirakis, and Mr. 
   Cuellar) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend and authorize annual appropriations for the United States 
Commission on International Religious Freedom through fiscal year 2026.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Commission on 
International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 207(a) of the 
International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)) is 
amended by striking ``2023 and 2024'' and inserting ``2025 and 2026''.
    (b) Extension of Authorization.--Section 209 of the International 
Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6436) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2024'' and inserting ``September 30, 2026''.
                                 <all>
```
S. Con. Res. 67 Agreed to September 26, 1996

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That there shall be printed as a Senate document the report

of the Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy.

SEC. 2. The document referred to in the first section shall

be—

(1) published under the supervision of the Secretary of

the Senate; and

(2) in such style, form, manner, and binding as directed

by the Joint Committee on Printing, after consultation with

the Secretary of the Senate.

The document shall include illustrations.

SEC. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies of the document, there shall be printed the lesser of—

(1) 5,000 copies for the use of the Secretary of the Senate;

or

(2) such number of copies as does not exceed a total production and printing cost of $45,000.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-6148

ARTHUR W. PRIVOTT, a/k/a Big Bud,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.

Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-98-5, CA-99-73-2-BO)

Submitted: February 26, 2002

Decided: March 29, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Arthur W. Privott, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Arthur W. Privott appeals from the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion, attacking his conviction and sentence for violating 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001). For

the following reasons, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

Privott claims that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a

notice of appeal following his sentencing. The district court rejected

this claim, finding that Privott failed to show prejudice. This finding

was erroneous, however, under this court’s decision in United States

v. Peak, 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993). In Peak, we held that counsel’s failure to pursue an appeal requested by a defendant constitutes

ineffective assistance of counsel regardless of the likelihood of success on the merits. Id. Thus, if counsel promises to note an appeal and

then fails to do so, petitioner is entitled to relief in the form of a

belated appeal. Id.; see also Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470

(2000). 

We note that this case differs from Peak in that the parties dispute

whether Privott directed his counsel to file a notice of appeal. Further,

the record is unclear as to whether or not Privott’s counsel consulted

with him regarding an appeal. Even if a defendant does not specifically instruct counsel to appeal, counsel may still have a duty to consult with his client about an appeal. Roe, 528 U.S. at 478. These

issues must be addressed in the first instance by the district court. 

Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability and vacate the

district court’s order and remand for compliance with this opinion,

Peak, and Roe. We decline to address any other claims on appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED

2 UNITED STATES v. PRIVOTT
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1324 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1324

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1324/2002 of 22 July 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 as regards the conditions for the payment of export refunds on cereal products **

*
Official Journal L 194 , 23/07/2002 P. 0026 - 0026 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1324/2002

of 22 July 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 as regards the conditions for the payment of export refunds on cereal products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/2000(2), and in particular Article 13 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002(3) provides for derogations to Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1253/2002(5), as regards the payment of a differentiated refund.

(2) Article 2 states that the Regulation shall apply from 1 July 2002. As this date could cause some confusion, the scope of the Regulations application should be made explicit.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The second subparagraph of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002 is replaced by the following: "It shall apply to export declarations accepted on or after 1 July 2002."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 46.

(4) OJ L 102, 17.4.1999, p. 11.

(5) OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 12.
S. Con. Res. 37 Agreed to December 22, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concur- ring), That the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2539) entitled ‘‘An Act to abolish the Interstate

Commerce Commission, to amend subtitle IV of title 49, United

States Code, to reform economic regulation of transportation, and

for other purposes’’ shall make the following corrections: (1) In section 11326(b) proposed to be inserted in title

49, United States Code, by section 102, strike ‘‘unless the

applicant elects to provide the alternative arrangement specified in this subsection. Such alternative’’ and insert ‘‘except

that such’’.

(2) In section 13902(b)(5) proposed to be inserted in title

49, United States Code, by section 103, strike ‘‘Any’’ and insert

‘‘Subject to section 14501(a), any’’.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### Magdalena Marcos PASCUA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ONEWEST BANK, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15378

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 31, 2017

*709Magdalena Marcos Pascua, Pro Se

Judy A. Tanaka, Esquire, Michelle Co-meau, Esquire, Attorney, Alston Hunt Floyd *&*Ing, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Magdalena Marcos Pascua appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action alleging federal claims arising out foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Arrington v. Wong,*237 F.3d 1066, 1069 (9th Cir. 2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Pascua’s action on the basis of the prior exclusive jurisdiction doctrine because Pascua and defendant were involved in a prior, concurrent foreclosure action concerning the same property in state court. *See Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Tr. Co.,*651 F.3d 1039, 1044 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[W]here parallel state and federal proceedings seek to determine interests in specific property as against the whole world *(in rem),*or where the parties’ interests in the property ... serve as the basis of the jurisdiction for the parallel proceedings *(quasi in rem),*then the doctrine of prior exclusive jurisdiction fully applies.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); *see also United States v. One 1985 Cadillac Seville,*866 F.2d 1142, 1145 (9th Cir. 1989) (where a property is already under the in rem jurisdiction of a state court, the federal court must yield to the prior, concurrent state court proceeding).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy R. Wiese, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended report on Form 10-Q /A of CSG Systems International, Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 29,
2012 |  |  |  | /s/  Randy R. Wiese                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Randy R. Wiese                                      
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0361 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0361

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 361/2002 of 27 February 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 936/97 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat **

*
Official Journal L 058 , 28/02/2002 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 361/2002

of 27 February 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 936/97 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2345/2001(2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of 27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and for frozen buffalo meat(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 134/1999(4), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

Canada has designated a new authority empowered to issue certificates of authenticity. Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 936/97 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 936/97, the authority called "Food Production and Inspection Branch - Agriculture Canada, Direction Générale 'Production et inspection des aliments' - Agriculture Canada" is hereby replaced by the "Canadian Food Inspection Agency - Government of Canada/Agence canadienne d'inspection des aliments - Gouvernement du Canada".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 February 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 315, 1.12.2001, p. 29.

(3) OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10.

(4) OJ L 17, 22.1.1999, p. 22.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6989 

To amend an Act of Congress approved June 8, 1940, with respect to 

emergency permits for rights-of-way, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2024 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend an Act of Congress approved June 8, 1940, with 

respect to emergency permits for rights-of-way, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Ridge Fire Safety 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LICENSES OR PERMITS TO OWNERS OF ADJACENT 

7 LANDS. 

8 Section 2 of the Act of Congress approved June 8, 

9 1940, entitled ‘‘To amend the Act of June 30, 1936 (49 

10 Stat. 2041), providing for the administration and mainteVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:03 Jan 24, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6989.IH H6989

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6989 IH

1 nance of the Blue Ridge Parkway, in the States of Vir2 ginia and North Carolina, by the Secretary of the Interior, 

3 and for other purposes.’’ is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘may issue’’ and inserting the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(1) may issue’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(2) shall issue at least 1 emergency permit for 

9 emergency use.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS