alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (c)
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of September 1, 2006 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank as Servicer and DB Structured
Products, Inc. as Owner, with respect to ACE 2006-SD3 (the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (the
"Servicer"), certify to the Owner, the Depositor and the Master Servicer under
the Securitization, the following for the 2006 fiscal year (the "Relevant
Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.


Dated as of February 22, 2007.

/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00374-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A. III, J.E.A., F.E.A., F.A.A., R.L., JR., AND B.J.L.

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-02352

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on September 13, 2021, but was not filed. On September 

15, 2021, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, requesting until September 21, 

2021, to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the court reporter’s requested extension and 

ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before September 21, 

2021. The court reporter is reminded that this is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating 

the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the 

date the notice of appeal was filed. See TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Given the time constraints 

governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be 

disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 53

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone on the success

of their recent democratic multiparty elections.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 23, 1996

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself, Mrs. KASSEBAUM, Mr. SIMON, and Mr.

FEINGOLD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of the Republic of Sierra Leone

on the success of their recent democratic multiparty elections.

Whereas since 1991 the people of the Republic of Sierra

Leone have endured a horrific civil war that has killed

thousands of individuals and displaced more than half the

population of the country;

Whereas for the first time in almost 30 years, the Republic

of Sierra Leone held its first truly democratic multiparty

elections to elect a president and parliament and put an

end to military rule;

Whereas the elections held on February 26, 1996, and the

subsequent runoff election held on March 15, 1996, were

deemed by international and domestic observers to be
2

•SCON 53 IS

free and fair and legitimate expressions of the will of the

people of the Republic of Sierra Leone;

Whereas success of the newly elected democratic government

led by President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah could have a positive effect on the West African neighbors of the Republic

of Sierra Leone; and

Whereas the historic event of democratic multiparty elections

in the Republic of Sierra Leone should be honored: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) congratulates the people of the Republic of

4 Sierra Leone for holding their first democratic

5 multiparty presidential and parliamentary elections

6 in nearly 30 years;

7 (2) encourages all people of the Republic of Si8 erra Leone to continue to negotiate an end to the

9 civil war and to work together after taking the criti10 cal first step of holding democratic elections in that

11 country;

12 (3) reaffirms the commitment of the United

13 States to help nations move toward freedom and de14 mocracy; and

15 (4) further reaffirms that the United States is

16 committed to encouraging peace, democracy, and

17 economic development on the African continent.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0710(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0710(01)

**Decision on official holidays of 10 June 2003 **

*
Official Journal L 172 , 10/07/2003 P. 0012 - 0013 *

Decision on official holidays

of 10 June 2003

THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Article 80(2) of the Rules of Procedure,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 28(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court observes the official holidays of the place where it has its seat and, in accordance with Article 80(2) of those Rules, it draws up a list of official holidays to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

(2) The list of official holidays drawn up on 19 June 1991(1) includes 24 June, where 23 June is a Sunday, since the Luxembourg legislation then in force provided that, where the day of the public celebration of the Grand Duke's birthday, specified to be 23 June, fell on a Sunday, the public celebration of that birthday was to be put back to 24 June.

(3) By Law of 12 February 1999, that legislation was amended and 24 June is no longer a public holiday where 23 June falls on a Sunday.

(4) It is therefore necessary to draw up a new list of official holidays,

DECIDES:

Article 1

For the purposes of Article 80(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the following shall be official holidays:

- New Year's Day,

- Easter Monday,

- 1 May,

- Ascension Day,

- Whit Monday,

- 23 June,

- 15 August,

- 1 November,

- 25 December,

- 26 December.

The official holidays referred to in the first paragraph hereof shall be those observed at the place where the Court of Justice has its seat.

Article 2

Article 80(2) of the Rules of Procedure shall apply only to the official holidays mentioned in Article 1 of this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision, which shall be annexed to the Rules of Procedure, shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 10 June 2003.

(1) OJ L 176, 4.7.1991, p. 31.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 21 - 00106 - CR THE STATE OF TEXAS , A PPELLANT V. IAN BILBREY , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 286th District Court Hockley County, Texas Trial Court No . 21 - 02 - 9981 , Honorable Pat Phelan , Presiding



### October 26 , 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. The State of Texas appeals from the trial court ’ s order granting the motion to suppress of Appellee, Ian Bilbrey. Now pending before this C ourt is the Stat e’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal . The motion is signed by the district attorney. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.2(a) . As no decision of the C ourt has been delivered, the motion is granted2

and the appeal is dismissed. 1 No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Per Curiam Do not publish.

1 Appellee’s pending motion for an extension of time to file a brief is rendered moot.
#### Johnny Lee READER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-40123

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

November 30, 2017

Johnny Lee Reader, Pro Se

Ernest Gonzalez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Defendant-Appellee

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Johnny Lee Reader, federal prisoner # 17905-078, has applied for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion requesting the return of property. By moving to proceed IFP, Reader challenges the district court’s determination that his appeal has not been brought in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Reader asserts that he is challenging the constitutionality and subject matter jurisdiction of the Government’s seizure of his property. However, his abbreviated IFP filing contains no argument on the issue whether , the forfeiture comported with due process, which was the only issue for the district court’s review. *See United States v. Robinson,*434 F.3d 357, 362 (5th Cir. 2005). Reader has therefore abandoned any challenge to the district court’s determination on that issue, *see Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987), and he has thus failed to demonstrate that his appeal raises legal points that are arguable on the merits and thus nonfrivo-lous. *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 *282(5th Cir. 1983). Because Reader has not shown that his appeal involves a nonfrivo-lous issue, we deny his motion to proceed IFP on appeal and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Reader is warned that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g) he will not be allowed to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|       (i)  | the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       (ii)      | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                                   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  December 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Andrew J. Buckland                                                 |   |
|                               |   | Andrew J. BucklandChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1758 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1758

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1758/2002 of 2 October 2002 prohibiting fishing for cod by vessels flying the flag of Portugal **

*
Official Journal L 265 , 03/10/2002 P. 0005 - 0005 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1758/2002

of 2 October 2002

prohibiting fishing for cod by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2846/98(2), and in particular Article 21(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2555/2001 of 18 December 2001 fixing for 2002 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where limitations in catch are required(3), lays down quotas for cod for 2002.

(2) In order to ensure compliance with the provisions relating to the quantity limits on catches of stocks subject to quotas, the Commission must fix the date by which catches made by vessels flying the flag of a Member State are deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated.

(3) According to the information received by the Commission, catches of cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal have exhausted the quota allocated for 2002. Portugal has prohibited fishing for this stock from 10 September 2002. This date should be adopted in this Regulation also,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal are hereby deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated to Portugal for 2002.

Fishing for cod in the waters of ICES sub-areas I and IIb (EC waters) by vessels flying the flag of Portugal or registered in Portugal is hereby prohibited, as are the retention on board, transhipment and landing of this stock caught by the above vessels after the date of application of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 10 September 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 358, 31.12.1998, p. 5.

(3) OJ L 347, 31.12.2001, p. 1.
**Exhibit 35**

** **

**ITEM 1123 CERTIFICATION**

** **

**I,David J. Kolibachuk, Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association (the “Servicer”),hereby certify that:**

** **

**(1) Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year covered by thisannual report on Form 10-K and of the performance of the Servicer underthe Standard Terms for Trust Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006,between the Servicer and the depositor (the “Agreement”) has been made under mysupervision;**

** **

**and**

** **

**(2) Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled allits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout thereporting period, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any suchobligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failureknown to me and the nature and status thereof.**

** **

** **

**Date:March 31, 2010**

** **

** **
| **/s/ David J. Kolibachuk** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------|------------|
| **David J. Kolibachuk**     | ** ** |
| **Vice President**          | ** ** |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUPERIOR SERVICES, INC.
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,136)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,850
<PP&E>                                         226,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                (62,352)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,447
<BONDS>                                         60,565
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,974
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,334
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of PowerCerv
Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                                    
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 2, 2002 |  | /s/ Aria L. Siplin                                 
|                       |  |                                                    
|                       |  | Name: Aria L. Siplin
Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Russell Glenn BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6966

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Russell Glenn Burnett, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Russell Glenn Burnett seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demon*278strating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is - debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of. a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burnett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of IRIDEX Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure control and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrants
internal control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFFName:  Theodore A. BoutacoffTitle:     President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)