alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **Exhibit 31.2**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

I, Ross Mulholland, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of InVision Technologies, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)        Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)        All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)       Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 10, 2003 | /s/ Ross Mulholland                                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Ross Mulholland                                        |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Damon Emanuel ELLIOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7636

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 6, 2017

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Eyler Kaplan, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*316Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order declining to file Elliott’s free-standing DNA motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Elliott, No. 8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6827-6828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01674]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Public Availability of DHS Fiscal Year 2012 Service Contract 
Inventory

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is publishing this notice to 
advise the public of the availability of the FY 2012 Service Contract 
inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2012. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and

[[Page 6828]]

December 19, 2011 available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories by the Office of Management 
and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). The guidance 
for preparing and analyzing FY 2012 inventories is unchanged from 
OFFP's November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 guidance for preparing 
the inventories. DHS has posted its FY 2012 inventory for public review 
at: http://www.dhs.gov/xopnbiz/regulations/editorial_0504.shtm under 
``Acquisition Reports and Notices.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice, 
please contact Gail Carter at Gail.A.Carter1@dhs.gov, or telephone 202-
447-5302.

Anne Terry,
Acting Chief Procurement Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-01674 Filed 1-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POWER CERV AS OF AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) 10-Q FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,787)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   264
<PP&E>                                           5,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,419
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (232)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,833)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                       294
<INVENTORY>                                      1,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,158
<PP&E>                                           3,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,371
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,226
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,580
<SALES>                                          4,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,689
<CGS>                                            2,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (218)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (507)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CARLOS JONATHAN GONZALEZ

BECERRA, a.k.a. Carlos Jonathan Becerra, 

a.k.a. Jonathan Becerra, a.k.a. Carlos 

Jonathan Gonzalez, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-50155 

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00812-DSF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2019**

Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Jonathan Gonzalez Becerra appeals from the revocation of supervised 

release and the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Becerra’s counsel has filed a brief stating that 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-50155 

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record. We have provided Becerra the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. However, 

the court has considered Becerra’s letter dated July 27, 2018.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### Anthony Donnell GLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee, and Warden Larry Cartledge, Respondent.

No. 17-6846

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 2017

Decided: November 8, 2017

Anthony Donnell Glover, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Glover seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his petition, We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 8, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on June 22, 2017.* Because Glover failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*307terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed, R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 276, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan He and Xiuyong Zhang, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.



May 7, 2012



|/s/ Xiaoan He                             | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|Xiaoan He
        Chief Executive Officer | 



|/s/ Xiuyong Zhang                             | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Xiuyong Zhang
        Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Donna M. WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Bureau of the Census; Stephen Taylor, Management Official; Claudette Bennett, Management Official; William Savino, Management Official, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1147

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: December 4, 2017

Donna M. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Anderson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit-Judges.

*180Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donna M. Ward, a former Census Bureau employee, challenged her removal before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). After the MSPB upheld her removal, Ward filed suit in district court against the Department of Commerce and Census Bureau employees Stephen Taylor, Claudette Bennett, and William Savino (collectively, “Appellees”), raising federal and state claims arising out of her termination. She appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for reconsideration of its order (1) granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss or for summary judgment and (2) denying as futile leave to further amend Ward’s amended complaint.

Although the district court considered the motion to reconsider as one filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), the motion was more properly construed as one filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) because it was filed more than 28 days after entry of judgment. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), *60(b); In re Burnley,*988 F.2d 1, 2-3 (4th Cir. 1992) (per cu-riam). Because Ward’s motion failed to demonstrate any grounds that would entitle her to relief pursuant to Rule 60(b), however, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. *See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLC,*859 F.3d 295, 299 (4th Cir. 2017) (providing standard of review).

Accordingly, we grant Ward’s motion to file a corrected informal brief but affirm the district court’s order. *See Ward v. United States Dep’t of Commerce,*No. 8:15-cv-00817-GJH (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
             RALI SERIES 2006-QS18 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
II

Calendar No. 316

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 802

[Report No. 104–214]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel ROYAL

AFFAIRE.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 15, 1995

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

JANUARY 26, 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel ROYAL AFFAIRE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, and
2

S 802 RS

1 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of

2 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

3 with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel ROYAL

4 AFFAIRE, United States official number 649292.

Calendar No. 316

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 802

[Report No. 104–214]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

AFFAIRE.wise trade endorsement for the vessel ROYALissue a certificate of documentation and coastJANUARY 26, 1996

Reported without amendment
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 84

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding sections 12106 through 12108 of

5 title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer6 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the Sec7 retary of Transportation may issue a certificate of docu8 mentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel
2

•S 84 IS

1 BAGGER, hull identification number 3121125, and State

2 of Hawaii registration number HA1809E.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB880]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a public meeting of its Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish (MSB) 
Committee. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda details.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, March 28, 2022, from 1 p.m. 
until 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the calendar prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council's Mackerel, Squid, and 
Butterfish (MSB) Committee will develop recommendations for the Council 
regarding 2022 Illex specifications and Atlantic mackerel rebuilding 
alternatives after reviewing input from the Council's Scientific and 
Statistical Committee (SSC), MSB Monitoring Committee, MSB Advisory 
Panel, and staff.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-05264 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P