alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 801 

To waive and repay certain debts relating to assistance provided to individuals 

and households. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. NADLER, Mr. SIRES, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. 

PASCRELL, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. NORCROSS, Miss RICE of New 

York, Mr. PAYNE, and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To waive and repay certain debts relating to assistance 

provided to individuals and households. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Assistance 

5 Recoupment Fairness Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEBTS ARISING SINCE 2012. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘covered 

8 assistance’’ means assistance provided— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 801 IH

1 (1) under section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 

2 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 5174); and 

4 (2) in relation to a major disaster declared by 

5 the President under section 401 of the Robert T. 

6 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) during the period beginning 

8 on January 1, 2012, and ending on the date of en9 actment of this Act. 

10 (b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—The Administrator of the 

11 Federal Emergency Management Agency shall waive a 

12 debt owed to the United States related to covered assist13 ance provided to an individual or household, unless the 

14 debt involves fraud, the intentional presentation of a false 

15 claim, or intentional misrepresentation by the debtor or 

16 any party having an interest in the claim. 

17 (c) REPAYMENT AUTHORITY.—The Administrator of 

18 the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall reim19 burse a debtor for any payments made by the debtor on 

20 a debt owed to the United States related to covered assist21 ance, if the Administrator would have otherwise been re22 quired to waive the debt under subsection (b). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Applied Graphics Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth Torosian, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                 /s/ KENNETH TOROSIAN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Kenneth Torosian
                                             Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer

August 14, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10



                              MARINE FUEL AGREEMENT

         This MARINE FUEL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this the ____ day
of ______________, 2002 by and between Midstream Fuel Service, Inc., an Alabama
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Midstream," and Martin Midstream
Partners L.P., a Delaware partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Customer."
Midstream and Customer agree as follows:

         1. For and in consideration of the conditions set forth herein, and
upon the terms and conditions hereinafter described, Midstream does hereby agree
to supply Customer High Sulfur Diesel ASTM D-975 No. 2 to Customer at
Midstream's docks in Mobile, Alabama; Theodore, Alabama; and Pascagoula,
Mississippi. The term of this agreement for three years, commencing __________,
2002. After the initial term, the term shall automatically renew from year to
year, unless either party gives written notice at least thirty (30) days prior
to the expiration of the initial term or of any renewal term.

         2. Customer agrees to purchase from Midstream one hundred percent
(100%) its High Sulfur Diesel fuel requirements that occur in the Mobile,
Theodore, or Pascagoula areas, during the term of this agreement. Midstream
agrees to sell Customer High Sulfur Diesel ASTM D-975 No. 2 at its applicable
dock, at a price per gallon equal to Midstream's Average Inventory Cost in
effect on the date of delivery, plus $0.035 per gallon. Additional charges will
apply for deliveries made to locations other than Midstream's docks. Payments
shall be sent to Midstream at P.O. Box 911649, Dallas, Texas 75391-1649, or to
such other address as Midstream shall designate in writing.



<PAGE>

         3. Midstream's Standard Conditions of Sale as set forth on Exhibit A
shall govern the terms and conditions of sales of High Sulfur Diesel ASTM D-975
No. 2 to Customer by Midstream.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed the date first mentioned above.

                                MIDSTREAM FUEL SERVICE, INC.


                                By:
                                   ---------------------------------------------

                                Its:
                                    --------------------------------------------



                                MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P.

                                By:      Martin Midstream GP LLC

                                         Its:   General Partner


                                By:
                                   ---------------------------------------------

                                Its:
                                    --------------------------------------------



                                        2

<PAGE>



                                    EXHIBIT A






                                      A-1
#### Alexander JIGGETTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; Jay Fisher, Baltimore County Circuit; County Clerk Julie Ensor; Baltimore County Circuit Court Chief Judge, Unknown Name, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6937

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Alexander Jiggetts, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Jiggetts appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Jiggetts v. Balt. Cty. Sheriff,*No. 1:17-cv-01525-JFM (D. Md. June 30, 2017). We dispense with *272oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/
    A of the Company for the quarterly period ended
    September 27, 2003 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                          



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ LINDA M. SILUK     
| |                        
| | Linda M. Siluk         
| | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: July 9, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Meeting with EPA and PMAA

March 19, 2014

EPA – Carolyn Hoskinson, mark Barolo, Paul Miller, Tim Smith, Liz McDermott, Erin 

Knighton, Ryan Haerer

PMAA – Mark Morgan, Rob Underwood

Volta Oil & dependable Petroleum Service – Bruce Garrett

EPA and PMAA discussed comments on the proposed changes to the UST regulations. PMAA 

presented their alternative proposal to the proposed rule. Attachments.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roderick Lamar WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7180

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

*295Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge;

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Lamar Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 15 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 15

   A resolution making majority party appointments to certain Senate 
            committees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Dole) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   A resolution making majority party appointments to certain Senate 
            committees for the One Hundred Fourth Congress.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following standing committees for the One Hundred 
Fourth Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Armed Services: Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, Mr. Cohen, 
Mr. McCain, Mr. Lott, Mr. Coats, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kempthorne, Mrs. 
Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Santorum.
    Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Gramm, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Bond, Mr. Mack, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Bennett, Mr. 
Grams, and Mr. Frist.
    Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Mr. Pressler, 
Mr. Packwood, Mr. Stevens, Mr. McCain, Mr. Burns, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Lott, 
Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Ashcroft.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Packwood, Mr. Dole, Mr. Roth, Mr. Chafee, 
Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Pressler, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
Murkowski, and Mr. Nickles.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Hatch, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Simpson, 
Mr. Grassley, Mr. Specter, Mr. Brown, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Kyl, Mr. 
DeWine, and Mr. Abraham.
    Committee on Labor and Human Resources: Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. 
Jeffords, Mr. Coats, Mr. Gregg, Mr. Frist, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Ashcroft, 
Mr. Abraham, and Mr. Gorton.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2008111EN.01001502.xml

| 23.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/15

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1518/2003 of 28 August 2003 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the pigmeat sector

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 217 of 29 August 2003
  )

On page 37, in Article 7(1)(a):

for:

| ‘(a) | the applications for export licences as referred to in Article 1 lodged from Monday to Wednesday of the same week, stating whether they fall within the scope of Article 4 or not;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

the applications for export licences as referred to in Article 1 lodged from Monday to Wednesday of the same week, stating whether they fall within the scope of Article 4 or not;’,

read:

| ‘(a) | the applications for export licences as referred to in Article 1 lodged from Monday to Friday of the same week, stating whether they fall within the scope of Article 4 or not;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(a)

the applications for export licences as referred to in Article 1 lodged from Monday to Friday of the same week, stating whether they fall within the scope of Article 4 or not;’.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 61 

To preserve the access of victims of trafficking to information about their 

eligibility to receive SNAP benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To preserve the access of victims of trafficking to information 

about their eligibility to receive SNAP benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing the Assist5 ance of Victims of Exploitation Act of 2015 (SAVE Act)’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Trafficking in humans, and especially do9 mestic child trafficking, has no place in a civilized 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 61 IH

1 society. Those who engage in this illicit trade should 

2 be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. 

3 (2) State and local law enforcement agencies 

4 should have the tools, resources, and training nec5 essary to identify, apprehend, and prosecute crimi6 nals who ruthlessly traffic in children and young 

7 persons. 

8 (3) One of the most effective resources in bring9 ing criminals to justice is the cooperation and assist10 ance of their victims. 

11 SEC. 3. CONTINUATION OF SNAP INFORMATION ASSIST12 ANCE. 

13 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 

14 the funds made available to carry out the Food and Nutri15 tion Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) may be used 

16 in contravention of section 107(b) of Division A of the 

17 Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 

18 2000 (114 Stat. 1482; 22 U.S.C. 7105(b)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Triangle Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven C. Lilly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ STEVEN C. LILLYSteven C. LillyChief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK CAPRIOTTI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 168 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK CAPRIOTTI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 169 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit
            99.1
 Annual
            Servicer's Certificate
 Provided
            by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
 to
            Holders
            of Notes and Certificates







**NISSAN
      MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION**






**OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE**






The
      undersigned, Rakesh Kochhar, Treasurer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
      a
      California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as
      such corporate officer, as follows:






(1)           The
      undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its
      capacity as Servicer, during the period November 21, 2006 through March 31,
      2007, and of the Company’s performance under the Agreement (as defined below) to
      be conducted under his supervision; and






(2)           To
      the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has
      fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      during the period November 21, 2006 through March 31, 2007, except for an
      instance of technical non-compliance regarding a single input error that did
      not
      have a material adverse impact on the Noteholders and did not create a Servicer
      Default.






This
      Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 8.11(a)(2) of the
      2006-A Servicing Supplement, dated as of November 21, 2006, by and among
      Nissan-Infiniti LT, NILT Trust and the Company (the “Agreement”).






Capitalized
      terms not otherwise defined herein have the meaning assigned to them in the
      Agreement.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 31st day of
      March,
      2007.




/s/
      Rakesh
      Kochhar


Rakesh
      Kochhar


Treasurer













44
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6492 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the mortgage interest 

deduction relating to acquisition indebtedness for certain taxpayers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2016 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the mortgage interest deduction relating to acquisition 

indebtedness for certain taxpayers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Benefit for Home5 ownership Clarification Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6492 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN LIMITATION ON MORTGAGE INTER2 EST DEDUCTION RELATING TO ACQUISITION 

3 INDEBTEDNESS FOR CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. 

4 (a) ACQUISITION INDEBTEDNESS.—Clause (ii) of sec5 tion 163(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

6 is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(ii) LIMITATION.—The aggregate 

8 amount treated as acquisition indebtedness 

9 for any period shall not exceed— 

10 ‘‘(I) $1,000,000 in the case of a 

11 joint return ($500,000 in the case of 

12 a married individual filing a separate 

13 return), and 

14 ‘‘(II) the applicable amount in 

15 any other case. 

16 ‘‘(iii) APPLICABLE AMOUNT.—For 

17 purposes of clause (ii)(II), the applicable 

18 amount is as follows: 

‘‘For taxable years— The applicable 

amount is— 

Beginning in calendar year 2017 ............................................... $900,000

Beginning in calendar year 2018 ............................................... $800,000

Beginning in calendar year 2019 ............................................... $700,000

Beginning in calendar year 2020 ............................................... $600,000

Beginning in or after calendar year 2021 .................................. $500,000.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6492 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts paid or incurred 

3 after December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS