alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

       CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER*

      Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted), Dr. Sergio Magistri, Chief Executive Officer of InVision
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), and Ross Mulholland, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:

      1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
            September 26, 2004, and to which this Certification is attached as
            Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934, and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
4th day of November, 2004.

                               /s/ Sergio Magistri
                               -------------------------
                               Sergio Magistri, Ph.D.
                               Chief Executive Officer

                               /s/ Ross Mulholland
                               --------------------------
                               Ross Mulholland
                               Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to InVision Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by InVision
Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

*     This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is being
      furnished to, and shall not be deemed filed with, the SEC or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
      as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
      made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                     11,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,388
<PP&E>                                          24,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,206
<SALES>                                          4,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,557
<CGS>                                            3,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    74
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                       634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                  69,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  11,561
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  37,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   6,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 135,772
<PP&E>                                               0                  37,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 499,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 130,682
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     347
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 333,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 333,594
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,022                  93,405
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,733                  84,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,289                   9,231
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,893                   4,119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,396                   5,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,396                   5,112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26                    0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26                    0.16
        

</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives is directed to correct the enrollment of H.R. 402 as

4 follows:

5 Amend section 109 to read:

6 ‘‘SEC. 109. CONFIRMATION OF WOODY ISLAND AS ELIGI7 BLE NATIVE VILLAGE.

8 ‘‘The Native Village of Woody, Island located on

9 Woody Island, Alaska, in the Koniag Region, is hereby

10 confirmed as an eligible Alaska Native Village, pursuant

11 to section 11(b)(3) of the Alaska Native Claims Settle12 ment Act (‘‘ANCSA’’). It is further confirmed that

13 Leisnoi, Inc., is the Village Corporation, as that term is

14 defined in section 3(j) of ANCSA, for the village of Woody

15 Island. This section shall become effective on October 1,

16 1998, unless the United States judicial system determines
2

SCON 27 ES

1 this village was fraudulently established under ANCSA

2 prior to October 1, 1998.’’.

Passed the Senate September 20 (legislative day,

September 5), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 402.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert R. Gerber, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Robert R. Gerber
------------------------------------------
Robert R. Gerber
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 721 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 721

   To impose a moratorium on sanctions under the Clean Air Act with 
  respect to marginal and moderate ozone nonattainment areas, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1995

 Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Cohen) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To impose a moratorium on sanctions under the Clean Air Act with 
  respect to marginal and moderate ozone nonattainment areas, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREAS.

    (a) In General.--During the 1-year period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency shall not initiate or continue in effect an 
enforcement action against a State with respect to an area that, 
before, on, or after that date, is designated nonattainment for ozone 
and classified as a Marginal Area or Moderate Area under section 181 of 
the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7511), including such an area that is 
located in the ozone transport region established by section 184(a) of 
that Act (42 U.S.C. 7511c(a)).
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``enforcement action'' 
includes--
            (1) the withholding of a grant under section 105 of the 
        Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7405);
            (2) the promulgation of a Federal implementation plan under 
        section 110(c) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7410);
            (3) the imposition of a sanction under section 110(m) or 
        179 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7410(m), 7509); and
            (4) any other action intended to obtain compliance (unless 
        the action is agreed to by the State) or punish noncompliance 
        with a requirement applicable to an area described in 
        subsection (a) under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 
        seq.).
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.118    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO THE
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
  


        This Amendment Agreement, made as of the 24th day of May, 2002, is between ATC Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company") and
Alan Levy (the "Employee"). 


        Whereas,
the Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2000 and 


        Whereas,
the parties now desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein; 


        Now
Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 



	1.
	Section 3
of the Agreement, relating to term is hereby amended such that term now is extended through May 31, 2004.



	2.
	Section 4(a)
of the Agreement relating to compensation, is hereby amended such that the employee's base salary as of June 1, 2002 will be $180,000 and such salary will be
increased to $190,000 on June 1, 2003.



	3.
	Section 4(f)
of the Agreement relating to a car allowance is hereby amended to be $8,000 per annum payable on a weekly basis.



	4.
	Section 5(d)
of the Agreement relating to change in control is hereby amended such that the time after a Change in Control is changed from the end of (6) months to the
end of (12) twelve months; the severance payment (6) six months salary is changed to (12) months salary; and the payment period is
changed from a payment period of (6) months to (12) months. The severance payments and the amount of payments will be controlled by the shorter period of time between the
(12) months and the length of time remaining on the employment contract.



	5.
	In
consideration for entering into this Amended Employment Agreement, employee will be granted 10,000 options in Class A stock of the Company at the execution date of this
agreement based on the end of day American Stock Exchange closing price. 




        Except
as expressly amended herein, all other terms, conditions and agreements, representations and warranties contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 



	ATC Healthcare, Inc.	 	Employee
	

/s/ David Savitsky

President & CEO	
 	

/s/ Alan Levy











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.118


AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Wendell DOBY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6843

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Ronald Wendell Doby, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Eugene Anthony, Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*258Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wendell Doby appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Doby,*No. 3:08-cr-00029-HEH-DJN-1 (E.D. Va. June 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 732

To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to prohibit Members

of Congress from receiving Federal workers’ compensation benefits for

injuries caused by stress or any other emotional condition, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to

prohibit Members of Congress from receiving Federal

workers’ compensation benefits for injuries caused by

stress or any other emotional condition, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

4 CLAIMS BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8101(5) of title 5, United

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(5) ‘injury’—
2

•S 732 IS

1 ‘‘(A) includes, in addition to injury by acci2 dent, a disease proximately caused by the em3 ployment, and damage to or destruction of med4 ical braces, artificial limbs, and other prosthetic

5 devices which shall be replaced or repaired, and

6 such time lost while such device or appliance is

7 being replaced or repaired; except that eye8 glasses and hearing aides would not be re9 placed, repaired, or otherwise compensated for,

10 unless the damages or destruction is incident to

11 a personal injury requiring medical services;

12 and

13 ‘‘(B) shall not include, with respect to a

14 Member of Congress, injuries or occupational

15 diseases caused by stress or any mental or emo16 tional condition.’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect 30

18 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall

19 apply only to claims filed under chapter 81 of title 5,

20 United States Code, on or after such effective date.

Æ
EXHIBIT 4.4

March 2002

       BCP and Banco Santander Central Hispano, S.A. ("Santander") entered into
       an agreement, dated March 12, 2002, under the terms of which, subject to
       authorization from the relevant authorities, BCP agreed to sell to
       Santander and Santander agreed to purchase from BCP for a total
       consideration of U.S. $85,000000, BCP's economic interests in 66,666,000
       convertible bonds and 42,650,000 series "O" shares, representing 8,276%
       of the share capital of Grupo Financiero Bital, S.A. of Mexico.


                                      217
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine Demetrius LUNDY, a/k/a Buff, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6994

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Antoine Demetrius Lundy, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antoine Demetrius Lundy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.*
      *284The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims,. is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lundy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

The district court’s order also denied Lundy’s motion for a reduction in sentence. Because *284Lundy does not challenge that ruling, he has forfeited appellate review of that portion of the district court’s order. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b).
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-10103 SUMMARY CALENDAR

CHARLES MCCLURE; JEANNIE MCCLURE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF MIDLAND,

Defendant,

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION in its CORPORATE CAPACITY .

Movant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(3:93-MC-92-H)

December 3, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Charles and Jeannie McClure appeal the granting of FDICCorporate’s motion to correct an abstract of judgment filed by the

McClures showing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in its

Corporate Capacity (FDIC-Corporate)as a judgment debtor.

In December 1986, a jury found Securit y Pacific Bank ofMidland, Texas (Security) liable to the McClures for violations of

the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1971-1978. In

accordance with the treble damage provisions of 12 U.S.C. § 1975,

the court entered judgment against Security in the amount of

$2,250,000 on December 31, 1986. The FDIC as receiver was

substituted as de fendant to the action on February 13, 1987. On

November 20, 1987, an amendment to the December 31, 1986 judgment

deleted the treble damages portion of the award. The November 20,

1987 order was re-entered on March 31, 1988. The McClures argue

that by virtue of language inserted in a January 29, 1993 order

dismissing their motion to have the November 20, 1987 order, as reentered on Ma rch 31, 1988, declared void that FDIC-Corporate was

also a party to the 1987 order.

The district court, adopting the magistrate’s report and

recommendations, found the abstract of judgment erroneous as the

underlying judgment was not entered against FDIC-Corporate. In

addition, the district court concluded the filing of the abstract

of judgme nt violated 12 U.S.C. §§ 1825(b)(2) and 1823(d)(3)(A).

The district court thus ordered the abstract of judgment stricken.

After carefully reviewing the briefs and the relevant portions

of the record, we conclude the McClures’ arguments have no merit.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation adopted by the district court in

its December 31, 1996 order. AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0256 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LEA ALEX YATES II,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening bri ef on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 4 2022

02/04/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0256