### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg+2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River StationUnit 4Control Device ConfiguratonEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Test End Time Test End DateBasis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) CO Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission RateSteam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type

Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fuel #4Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

1 6/5/2010 8:40 6/5/2010 2 6/5/2010 11:35 6/5/2010 3 6/5/2010 14:27 6/5/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) 11:09 1.00E-03 Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 ADL 14:01 [<4.62E-05] Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 BDL 16:53 2.10E-04 Dry U.S. EPA Method 316 ADL Test End Time Formaldehyde Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Method Blank Contamination 5.90E-03 1.02E-03 [<2.72E-04] [<4.73E-05] Method Blank Contamination 1.15E-03 2.14E-04 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure 9.6 12.13 7.3 1,260,476 275 9.9 12.16 7.32 1,258,887 279 9.8 12.12 7.28 1,177,497 279 Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow

Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Fuel #2 Fuel #3Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Methane Emission Test Results

Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu Methane Emission Test Results Calculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Fuel #1 Fuel #2Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel

Input Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Fuel #4 Fuel #3Measurement

Method Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used SO 2Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments lb/mmBtu ppmdv @ 7% O 2 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%)Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Fuel #1 Fuel #2 Fuel #3Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

1 6/9/2010 8:08 2 6/9/2010 13:03 3 6/10/2010 7:40 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

6/9/2010 9:21 6.92 Dry 6/9/2010 14:35 6.68 Dry 6/10/2010 8:57 6.83 Dry Test End Date Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 6.50E-06 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 6.31E-06 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 6.32E-06 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsFuel Input Rate

9.01 11.5 7.3 1,163,199 265.8 8.75 11.4 7.4 1,204,758 275.1 8.82 11.9 7.1 1,255,300 270.6 Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng)

65446 173 1.2 174.2 100 74.2 73185 173 1 174 100 74 73207 179 0.5 179.5 100 79.5 Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

0.0114 0.693641618 6.527518534 68281 0.0112 0.578034682 6.599428522 73338 0.0114 0.279329609 6.966915951 73336 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≤20% of field

recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section Trap #1Section 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit

78 0.6 78.6 78.6 0.0114 0.123 74 0.8 74.8 74.8 0.0112 0.151 77 0.8 77.8 77.8 0.0114 0.187 ≤20% of field

recovery test Trap #2Breaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

0.769230769 6.923097527 0.395579 2.940973 8.4016 1.081081081 6.680887057 0.081459 0.613378 8.8367 1.038961039 6.830693096 0.136223 0.987293 8.8996 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or

≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1 ≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 Measured Spike Recovery ( R ) Paired Trap Agreement (RD)R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

95.50 99.09 101.55 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

98.7147993EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured Hg 0Value (μg/dscm) Measured Hg +2Value (μg/dscm) Test End Time Test End DateMeasured Hg PValue

(μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsTest Method

Comments Total Mercury (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethene 1 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethene 2 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloroethene 3 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloropropene 1 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloropropene 2 6/5/2010 1,1-Dichloropropene 3 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 2 6/5/2010 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 3 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 2 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 3 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromoethane 1 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromoethane 2 6/5/2010 1,2-Dibromoethane 3 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichloroethane 1 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichloroethane 2 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichloroethane 3 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichloropropane 1 6/5/2010 1,2-Dichloropropane 2 6/5/2010

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run Number Test Start Date1,2-Dichloropropane 3 6/5/2010

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichloropropane 1 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichloropropane 2 6/5/2010 1,3-Dichloropropane 3 6/5/2010 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 2,2-Dichloropropane 1 6/5/2010 2,2-Dichloropropane 2 6/5/2010 2,2-Dichloropropane 3 6/5/2010 2-Butanone 1 6/5/2010 2-Butanone 2 6/5/2010 2-Butanone 3 6/5/2010 2-Chlorotoluene 1 6/5/2010 2-Chlorotoluene 2 6/5/2010 2-Chlorotoluene 3 6/5/2010 2-Hexanone 1 6/5/2010 2-Hexanone 2 6/5/2010 2-Hexanone 3 6/5/2010 4-Chlorotoluene 1 6/5/2010 4-Chlorotoluene 2 6/5/2010 4-Chlorotoluene 3 6/5/2010 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1 6/5/2010 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 2 6/5/2010 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 3 6/5/2010 Acetone 1 6/5/2010 Acetone 2 6/5/2010 Acetone 3 6/5/2010 Benzene 1 6/5/2010 Benzene 2 6/5/2010 Benzene 3 6/5/2010 Bromobenzene 1 6/5/2010 Bromobenzene 2 6/5/2010 Bromobenzene 3 6/5/2010 Bromochloromethane 1 6/5/2010 Bromochloromethane 2 6/5/2010 Bromochloromethane 3 6/5/2010 Bromodichloromethane 1 6/5/2010 Bromodichloromethane 2 6/5/2010 Bromodichloromethane 3 6/5/2010 Bromoform 1 6/5/2010 Bromoform 2 6/5/2010 Bromoform 3 6/5/2010 Bromomethane 1 6/5/2010 Bromomethane 2 6/5/2010 Bromomethane 3 6/5/2010 Carbon disulfide 1 6/5/2010 Carbon disulfide 2 6/5/2010 Carbon disulfide 3 6/5/2010Carbon tetrachloride 1 6/5/2010

Carbon tetrachloride 2 6/5/2010 Carbon tetrachloride 3 6/5/2010 Chlorobenzene 1 6/5/2010 Chlorobenzene 2 6/5/2010 Chlorobenzene 3 6/5/2010 Chlorodibromomethane 1 6/5/2010 Chlorodibromomethane 2 6/5/2010 Chlorodibromomethane 3 6/5/2010 Chloroethane 1 6/5/2010 Chloroethane 2 6/5/2010 Chloroethane 3 6/5/2010 Chloroform 1 6/5/2010 Chloroform 2 6/5/2010 Chloroform 3 6/5/2010 Chloromethane 1 6/5/2010 Chloromethane 2 6/5/2010 Chloromethane 3 6/5/2010 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 6/5/2010 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 6/5/2010 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3 6/5/2010 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 6/5/2010 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2 6/5/2010 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3 6/5/2010 Dibromomethane 1 6/5/2010 Dibromomethane 2 6/5/2010 Dibromomethane 3 6/5/2010 Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 6/5/2010 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2 6/5/2010 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3 6/5/2010 Ethylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 Ethylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 Ethylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 Hexachlorobutadiene 1 6/5/2010 Hexachlorobutadiene 2 6/5/2010 Hexachlorobutadiene 3 6/5/2010 Isopropylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 Isopropylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 Isopropylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 Methylene chloride 1 6/5/2010 Methylene chloride 2 6/5/2010 Methylene chloride 3 6/5/2010 m-Xylene & p-Xylene 1 6/5/2010 m-Xylene & p-Xylene 2 6/5/2010 m-Xylene & p-Xylene 3 6/5/2010 Naphthalene 1 6/5/2010 Naphthalene 2 6/5/2010 Naphthalene 3 6/5/2010 n-Butylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 n-Butylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 n-Butylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 n-Propylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 n-Propylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 n-Propylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 o-Xylene 1 6/5/2010o-Xylene 2 6/5/2010

o-Xylene 3 6/5/2010 p-Isopropyltoluene 1 6/5/2010 p-Isopropyltoluene 2 6/5/2010 p-Isopropyltoluene 3 6/5/2010 sec-Butylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 sec-Butylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 sec-Butylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 Styrene 1 6/5/2010 Styrene 2 6/5/2010 Styrene 3 6/5/2010 tert-Butylbenzene 1 6/5/2010 tert-Butylbenzene 2 6/5/2010 tert-Butylbenzene 3 6/5/2010 Tetrachloroethene 1 6/5/2010 Tetrachloroethene 2 6/5/2010 Tetrachloroethene 3 6/5/2010 Toluene 1 6/5/2010 Toluene 2 6/5/2010 Toluene 3 6/5/2010 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 6/5/2010 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2 6/5/2010 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3 6/5/2010 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 6/5/2010 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2 6/5/2010 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3 6/5/2010 Trichloroethene 1 6/5/2010 Trichloroethene 2 6/5/2010 Trichloroethene 3 6/5/2010 Trichlorofluoromethane 1 6/5/2010 Trichlorofluoromethane 2 6/5/2010 Trichlorofluoromethane 3 6/5/2010 Vinyl chloride 1 6/5/2010 Vinyl chloride 2 6/5/2010 Vinyl chloride 3 6/5/2010Measured Value (μg/m3 @ 7% O2) 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.122] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.108] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.12] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.32] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.284] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.315] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 1.159] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.979] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 1.088] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.166] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.147] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.163] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 2.756] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 2.214] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 2.719] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.177] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.157] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.174] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.192] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.147] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.163] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 1.432] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 1.272] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 1.414] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.155] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.207] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.152] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.199] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.176] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.196] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.27] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.879] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.185] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.188] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.166] Test Start Time Test End Date Test End Time2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.185] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.256] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.176] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.196] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.155] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.137] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.152] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.155] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.137] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.152] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.168] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.147] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.174] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 11.009] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 9.788] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 10.877] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.133] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.117] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.131] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.749] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.666] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.74] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.155] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.137] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.152] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 11.009] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 9.788] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 10.877] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM 100.137 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 59.33] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM 80.918 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 4.177] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 6.371] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 3.685] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.222] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.196] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.218] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.309] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.274] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.305] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.149] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.127] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.141] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 1.104] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.979] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 1.088] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 8.491] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 8.925] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 5.962] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 2.135] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 1.534] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 2.085]8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.176] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.144] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.168] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.119] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.163] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.332] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.221] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.196] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.218] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.684] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.607] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.674] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.156] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.204] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.205] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 16.831] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 12.684] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 24.326] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.188] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.166] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.185] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.237] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.206] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.228] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 1.082] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.766] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.97] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.154] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.152] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.162] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.276] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.279] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.272] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM 12.256 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 16.905] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM 10.841 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.45] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.455] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.428] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 1.102] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.979] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 1.088] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.177]11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.193] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.202] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.157] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.137] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.157] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.111] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.098] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.109] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.157] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.158] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.141] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.125] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.108] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.12] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.122] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.108] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.12] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM 10.744 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 11.507] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM 12.342 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.221] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.196] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.218] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.133] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.117] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.131] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.243] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.215] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.239] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.37] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.421] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.312] 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 10:17 AM [< 0.249] 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 1:15 PM [< 0.206] 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 4:13 PM [< 0.228]Footnotes:

* Front half fraction contains filter, cyclone, and cartridge ** Back half fraction contains condensate, solvent, impingers

Basis Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Front Half Mass (ng)

Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 23.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 20.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 23.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 70] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 200] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 158.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 200] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 12.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 12.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 13.9] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 104] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 91] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 104] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 12.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 19.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 63.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 13.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 13.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.9]Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 13.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 12.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 800] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 700] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 800] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 54.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 47.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 54.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 800] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 700] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 800] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 6600 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 3420] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 5007 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 303] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 458.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 272.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 22.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 19.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 22.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.1] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 70] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 617] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 641.9] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 440.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 155.1] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 110.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 154.1]Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 24.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 49.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 43.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 49.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 12.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 13.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 1223] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 912.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1798.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 13.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 11.9] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 13.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 16.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 16.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 78.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 55] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 71.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.1] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10.9] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.9] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 641 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 970.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 547 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 27.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 26.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 25.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 70] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 80] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.6]Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 11.3] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 10.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 7.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 103.7 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 106.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B ADL 148.8 Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 16] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 8.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 9.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 17.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 15.4] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 17.6] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 26.5] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 30.2] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 23] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 16.8] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 14.7] Dry U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW -846 Method 8260B BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL[< 16.8]Back Half Mass (ng) Total Mass (ng) Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu

[< 0.071944] [< 8.871944] [< 0.0000001114] [< 0.046673] [< 7.746673] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000982] [< 0.046673] [< 8.846673] [< 0.0000001086] [< 0.04232] [< 8.04232] [< 0.000000101] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.071944] [< 23.271944] [< 0.0000002922] [< 0.123047] [< 20.423047] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000259] [< 0.123047] [< 23.323047] [< 0.0000002863] [< 4.232] [< 84.232] [< 0.0000010575] [< 0.4243] [< 70.4243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000008931] [< 0.4243] [< 80.4243] [< 0.0000009872] [< 0.04232] [< 8.04232] [< 0.000000101] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.046552] [< 12.046552] [< 0.0000001512] [< 0.063645] [< 10.563645] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000134] [< 0.063645] [< 12.063645] [< 0.0000001481] [< 0.071944] [< 8.071944] [< 0.0000001013] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.059248] [< 8.059248] [< 0.0000001012] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.287776] [< 200.287776] [< 0.0000025145] [< 1.06075] [< 159.26075] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000020196] [< 1.06075] [< 201.06075] [< 0.0000024679] [< 0.06348] [< 12.86348] [< 0.0000001615] [< 0.067888] [< 11.267888] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001429] [< 0.067888] [< 12.867888] [< 0.0000001579] [< 0.059248] [< 13.959248] [< 0.0000001753] [< 0.063645] [< 10.563645] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000134] [< 0.063645] [< 12.063645] [< 0.0000001481] [< 0.088872] [< 104.088872] [< 0.0000013068] [< 0.55159] [< 91.55159] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000001161] [< 0.55159] [< 104.55159] [< 0.0000012833] [< 0.08464] [< 11.28464] [< 0.0000001417] [< 0.059402] [< 14.859402] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001884] [< 0.059402] [< 11.259402] [< 0.0000001382] [< 0.04232] [< 14.44232] [< 0.0000001813] [< 0.076374] [< 12.676374] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001607] [< 0.076374] [< 14.476374] [< 0.0000001777] [< 0.055016] [< 19.655016] [< 0.0000002468] [< 0.072131] [< 63.272131] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000008024] [< 0.072131] [< 13.672131] [< 0.0000001678] [< 0.08464] [< 13.68464] [< 0.0000001718] [< 0.072131] [< 11.972131] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001518] Calculated Emission Rate[< 0.072131] [< 13.672131] [< 0.0000001678]

[< 4.232] [< 18.632] [< 0.0000002339] [< 0.076374] [< 12.676374] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001607] [< 0.076374] [< 14.476374] [< 0.0000001777] [< 0.04232] [< 11.24232] [< 0.0000001411] [< 0.059402] [< 9.859402] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000125] [< 0.059402] [< 11.259402] [< 0.0000001382] [< 0.050784] [< 11.250784] [< 0.0000001412] [< 0.059402] [< 9.859402] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000125] [< 0.059402] [< 11.259402] [< 0.0000001382] [< 0.04232] [< 12.24232] [< 0.0000001537] [< 0.063645] [< 10.563645] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000134] [< 0.063645] [< 12.863645] [< 0.0000001579] [< 0.093104] [< 8.093104] [< 0.0000001016] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.050784] [< 800.050784] [< 0.0000100443] [< 4.243] [< 704.243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000089305] [< 4.243] [< 804.243] [< 0.0000098717] [< 0.04232] [< 9.64232] [< 0.0000001211] [< 0.050916] [< 8.450916] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001072] [< 0.050916] [< 9.650916] [< 0.0000001185] [< 0.06348] [< 54.46348] [< 0.0000006838] [< 0.288524] [< 47.888524] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000006073] [< 0.288524] [< 54.688524] [< 0.0000006713] [< 0.093104] [< 11.293104] [< 0.0000001418] [< 0.059402] [< 9.859402] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000125] [< 0.059402] [< 11.259402] [< 0.0000001382] [< 0.067712] [< 800.067712] [< 0.0000100445] [< 4.243] [< 704.243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000089305] [< 4.243] [< 804.243] [< 0.0000098717] 677.12 7277.12 Method Blank Contamination 9.14E-05 848.6 [< 4268.6] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000541302] 975.89 5982.89 Method Blank Contamination 6.18E-05 [< 0.55016] [< 303.55016] [< 0.0000038109] [< 0.148505] [< 458.348505] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000058123] [< 0.148505] [< 272.448505] [< 0.0000033601] [< 0.118496] [< 16.118496] [< 0.0000002024] [< 0.08486] [< 14.08486] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001786] [< 0.08486] [< 16.08486] [< 0.0000001974] [< 0.055016] [< 22.455016] [< 0.0000002819] [< 0.118804] [< 19.718804] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000002501] [< 0.118804] [< 22.518804] [< 0.0000002764] [< 0.4232] [< 10.8232] [< 0.0000001359] [< 0.055159] [< 9.155159] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001161] [< 0.055159] [< 10.455159] [< 0.0000001283] [< 0.249688] [< 80.249688] [< 0.0000010075] [< 0.4243] [< 70.4243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000008931] [< 0.4243] [< 80.4243] [< 0.0000009872] [< 0.080408] [< 617.080408] [< 0.0000077472] [< 0.250337] [< 642.150337] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000081431] [< 0.250337] [< 440.850337] [< 0.0000054368] [< 0.046552] [< 155.146552] [< 0.0000019478] [< 0.080617] [< 110.380617] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000013997] [< 0.080617] [< 154.180617] [< 0.0000019015][< 0.1058] [< 12.8058] [< 0.0000001608]

[< 0.050916] [< 10.350916] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001313] [< 0.050916] [< 12.450916] [< 0.000000153] [< 0.04232] [< 8.64232] [< 0.0000001085] [< 0.04243] [< 11.74243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001489] [< 0.04243] [< 24.54243] [< 0.0000003023] [< 0.071944] [< 16.071944] [< 0.0000002018] [< 0.08486] [< 14.08486] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001786] [< 0.08486] [< 16.08486] [< 0.0000001974] [< 0.101568] [< 49.701568] [< 0.000000624] [< 0.263066] [< 43.663066] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000005537] [< 0.263066] [< 49.863066] [< 0.000000612] [< 2.5392] [< 11.3392] [< 0.0000001424] [< 2.20636] [< 14.70636] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001865] [< 1.95178] [< 15.15178] [< 0.0000001629] [< 0.1058] [< 1223.1058] Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000153556] [< 0.106075] [< 912.606075] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000115728] [< 0.106075] [< 1798.606075] Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000221928] [< 0.046552] [< 8.046552] [< 0.000000101] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.088872] [< 13.688872] [< 0.0000001719] [< 0.072131] [< 11.972131] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001518] [< 0.072131] [< 13.672131] [< 0.0000001678] [< 0.4232] [< 17.2232] [< 0.0000002162] [< 0.089103] [< 14.789103] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001875] [< 0.089103] [< 16.889103] [< 0.0000002073] [< 0.04232] [< 78.64232] [< 0.0000009873] [< 0.101832] [< 55.101832] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000006987] [< 0.101832] [< 71.701832] [< 0.0000008835] [< 0.122728] [< 11.222728] [< 0.0000001409] [< 0.04243] [< 10.94243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001388] [< 0.04243] [< 11.94243] [< 0.0000001468] [< 0.04232] [< 20.04232] [< 0.0000002516] [< 0.106075] [< 20.106075] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.000000255] [< 0.106075] [< 20.106075] [< 0.0000002468] [< 0.04232] [< 8.04232] [< 0.000000101] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] 249.688 890.688 Method Blank Contamination 1.12E-05 246.094 [< 1216.294] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000154239] 254.58 801.58 Method Blank Contamination 6.75E-06 [< 5.5016] [< 32.7016] [< 0.0000004106] [< 6.3645] [< 32.7645] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000004155] [< 6.3645] [< 31.6645] [< 0.0000003122] [< 0.06348] [< 80.06348] [< 0.0000010052] [< 0.4243] [< 70.4243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000008931] [< 0.4243] [< 80.4243] [< 0.0000009872] [< 0.04232] [< 8.04232] [< 0.000000101] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.059248] [< 8.059248] [< 0.0000001012] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 4.232] [< 12.832] [< 0.0000001611][< 5.0916] [< 13.8916] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001762] [< 5.5159] [< 14.9159] [< 0.000000116] [< 0.04232] [< 11.44232] [< 0.0000001437] [< 0.04243] [< 9.84243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001248] [< 0.04243] [< 11.64243] [< 0.0000001431] [< 0.08464] [< 8.08464] [< 0.0000001015] [< 0.04243] [< 7.04243] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000893] [< 0.04243] [< 8.04243] [< 0.0000000987] [< 0.076176] [< 11.376176] [< 0.0000001428] [< 0.055159] [< 11.355159] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.000000144] [< 0.055159] [< 10.455159] [< 0.0000001283] [< 0.262384] [< 9.062384] [< 0.0000001138] [< 0.046673] [< 7.746673] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000982] [< 0.046673] [< 8.846673] [< 0.0000001086] [< 0.076176] [< 8.876176] [< 0.0000001114] [< 0.046673] [< 7.746673] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000000982] [< 0.046673] [< 8.846673] [< 0.0000001086] 677.12 780.82 Method Blank Contamination 9.80E-06 721.31 [< 827.91] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included. Method Blank Contamination [< 0.0000104988] 763.74 912.54 Method Blank Contamination 1.84E-06 [< 0.04232] [< 16.04232] [< 0.0000002014] [< 0.08486] [< 14.08486] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001786] [< 0.08486] [< 16.08486] [< 0.0000001974] [< 0.046552] [< 9.646552] [< 0.0000001211] [< 0.050916] [< 8.450916] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001072] [< 0.050916] [< 9.650916] [< 0.0000001185] [< 0.050784] [< 17.650784] [< 0.0000002216] [< 0.093346] [< 15.493346] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001965] [< 0.093346] [< 17.693346] [< 0.0000002172] [< 0.4232] [< 26.9232] [< 0.000000338] [< 0.072131] [< 30.272131] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000003839] [< 0.072131] [< 23.072131] [< 0.0000002838] [< 1.2696] [< 18.0696] [< 0.0000002269] [< 0.089103] [< 14.789103] Run 2 pair B anasorb tube was damaged during analysis and no results were included [< 0.0000001875] [< 0.089103] [< 16.889103] [< 0.0000002073]ug/dscm @ 7% O2

9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.859.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.859.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.85 9.85 9.95 9.8512.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm) Flue Gas Temperature (F)12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.1512.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.0512.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15 12.13 7.3 1,276,364 274.05 12.16 7.32 1,280,315 277.65 12.12 7.28 1,181,530 277.15Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #1Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #3Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #4Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station

Speciated Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Data

Acenaphthene 1 Acenaphthene 2 Acenaphthene 3 Acenaphthylene 1 Acenaphthylene 2 Acenaphthylene 3 Anthracene 1 Anthracene 2 Anthracene 3 Benzo(a)anthracene 1 Benzo(a)anthracene 2 Benzo(a)anthracene 3 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 3 Benzo(ghi)perylene 1 Benzo(ghi)perylene 2 Benzo(ghi)perylene 3 Benzo(a)pyrene 1 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 Benzo(a)pyrene 3 Benzo(e)pyrene 1 Benzo(e)pyrene 2 Benzo(e)pyrene 3 Chrysene 1 Chrysene 2 Chrysene 3 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 3 Fluoranthene 1 Fluoranthene 2 Fluoranthene 3 Fluorene 1 Fluorene 2 Fluorene 3 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3 2-Methylnaphthalene 1 2-Methylnaphthalene 2 2-Methylnaphthalene 3 Naphthalene 1 Naphthalene 2

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as

needed) Run NumberNaphthalene 3

Perylene 1 Perylene 2 Perylene 3 Phenanthrene 1 Phenanthrene 2 Phenanthrene 3 Pyrene 1 Pyrene 2 Pyrene 3 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 1 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 2 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 3 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 1 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 2 2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 3 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 3 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 3 2,4-Dichlorophenol 1 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2 2,4-Dichlorophenol 3 2,4-Dimethylphenol 1 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2 2,4-Dimethylphenol 3 2,4-Dinitrophenol 1 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2 2,4-Dinitrophenol 3 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 3 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 3 2-Chloronaphthalene 1 2-Chloronaphthalene 2 2-Chloronaphthalene 3 2-Chlorophenol 1 2-Chlorophenol 2 2-Chlorophenol 32-Methylphenol 1

2-Methylphenol 2 2-Methylphenol 3 2-Nitroaniline 1 2-Nitroaniline 2 2-Nitroaniline 3 2-Nitrophenol 1 2-Nitrophenol 2 2-Nitrophenol 3 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 3 3-Methylphenol & 4-Methylphenol 1 3-Methylphenol & 4-Methylphenol 2 3-Methylphenol & 4-Methylphenol 3 3-Nitroaniline 1 3-Nitroaniline 2 3-Nitroaniline 3 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 3 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 3 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 2 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 3 4-Chloroaniline 1 4-Chloroaniline 2 4-Chloroaniline 3 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 3 4-Nitroaniline 1 4-Nitroaniline 2 4-Nitroaniline 3 4-Nitrophenol 1 4-Nitrophenol 2 4-Nitrophenol 3 Acetophenone 1 Acetophenone 2 Acetophenone 3 Aniline 1 Aniline 2 Aniline 3 Benzidine 1 Benzidine 2 Benzidine 3 Benzoic acid 1 Benzoic acid 2 Benzoic acid 3 Benzyl alcohol 1 Benzyl alcohol 2 Benzyl alcohol 3 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 2

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 3 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 1 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 2 bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 3 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 1 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 2 bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 3 Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 Butyl benzyl phthalate 2 Butyl benzyl phthalate 3 Carbazole 1 Carbazole 2 Carbazole 3 Dibenzofuran 1 Dibenzofuran 2 Dibenzofuran 3 Diethyl phthalate 1 Diethyl phthalate 2 Diethyl phthalate 3 Dim ethyl phthalate 1 Dim ethyl phthalate 2 Dim ethyl phthalate 3 Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 Di-n-butyl phthalate 2 Di-n-butyl phthalate 3 Di-n-octyl phthalate 1 Di-n-octyl phthalate 2 Di-n-octyl phthalate 3 Hexachlorobenzene 1 Hexachlorobenzene 2 Hexachlorobenzene 3 Hexachlorobutadiene 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 2 Hexachlorobutadiene 3 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 3 Hexachloroethane 1 Hexachloroethane 2 Hexachloroethane 3 Isophorone 1 Isophorone 2 Isophorone 3 Nitrobenzene 1 Nitrobenzene 2 Nitrobenzene 3 N-Nitrosodimethylam ine 1 N-Nitrosodimethylam ine 2 N-Nitrosodimethylam ine 3 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylam ine 1 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylam ine 2 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylam ine 3 N-Nitrosodiphenylam ine 1 N-Nitrosodiphenylam ine 2N-Nitrosodiphenylam ine 3

Pentachlorobenzene 1 Pentachlorobenzene 2 Pentachlorobenzene 3 Pentachloronitrobenzene 1 Pentachloronitrobenzene 2 Pentachloronitrobenzene 3 Pentachlorophenol 1 Pentachlorophenol 2 Pentachlorophenol 3 Phenol 1 Phenol 2 Phenol 3 Pyridine 1 Pyridine 2 Pyridine 3Boiler ID

Unit 4

6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010

6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End Date6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/20106/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/20106/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/20106/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 8:40 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 11:35 AM 6/5/2010 6/5/2010 2:27 PM 6/5/2010Footnotes: * Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Measured Value (μg/m3@7% O2) Basis (Wet or Dry)

11:09 AM [< 0.0097] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0115] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0134] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.003] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0036] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0026] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0038] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0039] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0037] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0033] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0033] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0036] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0377] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0439] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.036] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.043] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0439] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0412] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0046] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0046] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0049] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0168] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0215] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0061] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.005] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.005] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0054] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0022] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0023] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0024] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0036] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0038] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0037] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0088] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0079] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.009] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0115] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0156] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0144] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0043] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0044] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0028] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0567] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.066] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0807] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.2452] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.2482] Dry Test End Time4:53 PM [< 0.2545] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0027] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0027] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0029] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0448] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0408] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0408] Dry 11:09 AM [< 0.0319] Dry 2:01 PM [< 0.0323] Dry 4:53 PM [< 0.0357] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.9071] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.9068] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.1491] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.9952] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.9949] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.2445] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.4666] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.4664] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.6719] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.9071] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.9068] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.1491] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7749] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7747] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.0059] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.9952] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.9949] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.2445] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.3785] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.3783] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.5765] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5106] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5105] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.7197] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5987] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5985] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.8151] Dry 11:09 AM [< 5.8141] Dry 2:01 PM [< 5.8137] Dry 4:53 PM [< 6.2981] Dry 11:09 AM [< 37.8798] Dry 2:01 PM [< 37.877] Dry 4:53 PM [< 41.0334] Dry 11:09 AM [< 5.726] Dry 2:01 PM [< 5.7256] Dry 4:53 PM [< 6.2027] Dry 11:09 AM [< 5.8141] Dry 2:01 PM [< 5.8137] Dry 4:53 PM [< 6.2981] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7309] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7307] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.9582] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.6868] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.6866] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.9105] Dry11:09 AM [< 2.3345] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.3343] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.5288] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.6118] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.6115] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.9125] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.6118] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.6115] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.9125] Dry 11:09 AM [< 7.3117] Dry 2:01 PM [< 7.3111] Dry 4:53 PM [< 7.9204] Dry 11:09 AM [< 4.8451] Dry 2:01 PM [< 4.8447] Dry 4:53 PM [< 5.2485] Dry 11:09 AM [< 13.8305] Dry 2:01 PM [< 13.8295] Dry 4:53 PM [< 14.982] Dry 11:09 AM [< 8.6331] Dry 2:01 PM [< 8.6324] Dry 4:53 PM [< 9.3518] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.4356] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.4354] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.7216] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.5237] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.5234] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.8171] Dry 11:09 AM [< 6.4308] Dry 2:01 PM [< 6.4303] Dry 4:53 PM [< 6.9661] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7749] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7747] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.0059] Dry 11:09 AM [< 9.0735] Dry 2:01 PM [< 9.0729] Dry 4:53 PM [< 9.8289] Dry 11:09 AM [< 15.8567] Dry 2:01 PM [< 15.8555] Dry 4:53 PM [< 17.1768] Dry 11:09 AM [< 4.4487] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.9198] Dry 4:53 PM [< 4.5328] Dry 11:09 AM [< 7.576] Dry 2:01 PM [< 7.5754] Dry 4:53 PM [< 8.2067] Dry 11:09 AM [< 52.327] Dry 2:01 PM [< 52.3231] Dry 4:53 PM [< 56.6833] Dry 11:09 AM [< 96.9019] Dry 2:01 PM [< 88.086] Dry 4:53 PM [< 104.9691] Dry 11:09 AM [< 4.9332] Dry 2:01 PM [< 4.9328] Dry 4:53 PM [< 5.3439] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.2023] Dry2:01 PM [< 2.2021] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.3857] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.863] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.8628] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.1014] Dry 11:09 AM [< 9.514] Dry 2:01 PM [< 9.5133] Dry 4:53 PM [< 10.3061] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.9642] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.9639] Dry 4:53 PM [< 4.2942] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.6428] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.6426] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.8628] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.4225] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.4224] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.6242] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.863] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.8628] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.1014] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5987] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5985] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.8151] Dry 11:09 AM [< 4.1404] Dry 2:01 PM [< 4.14] Dry 4:53 PM [< 4.485] Dry 11:09 AM [< 4.0523] Dry 2:01 PM [< 4.052] Dry 4:53 PM [< 4.3896] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.9071] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.9068] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.1491] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.4225] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.4224] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.6242] Dry 11:09 AM [< 21.1422] Dry 2:01 PM [< 21.1406] Dry 4:53 PM [< 22.9024] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5987] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5985] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.8151] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5106] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5105] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.7197] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.5106] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.5105] Dry 4:53 PM [< 2.7197] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7749] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7747] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.0059] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7749] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7747] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.0059] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.1273] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.1271] Dry4:53 PM [< 3.3876] Dry 11:09 AM [< 2.7749] Dry 2:01 PM [< 2.7747] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.0059] Dry 11:09 AM [< 5.9022] Dry 2:01 PM [< 5.9018] Dry 4:53 PM [< 6.3936] Dry 11:09 AM [< 7.4879] Dry 2:01 PM [< 7.4873] Dry 4:53 PM [< 8.1113] Dry 11:09 AM [< 3.788] Dry 2:01 PM [< 3.4354] Dry 4:53 PM [< 3.9125] Dry 11:09 AM [< 7.576] Dry 2:01 PM [< 7.5754] Dry 4:53 PM [< 8.2067] Dry* Front Half Composite contains particulate filter, front half of the filter holder, and probe solvent rinses ** Back Half Composite contains XAD-2 resin tube, back half of the filter holder, and coil condenser solvent rinses *** Condensate Composite contains condensate and Impinger contents and the glassware solvent rinses

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Front Half mass* (ng)

U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 12 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 12 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 12 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 28 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 42 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 18 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 13 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 15 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [<1.7] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5.6] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5.6] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5.6] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 34 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 44 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 8.8 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2.8] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 3 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 3.3 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2.6] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 6.9 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 8.2 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 12 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 6 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 6.2 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 2 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 34 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 44 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 65 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 61 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 68

Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test ResultsU.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 38 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1.5] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 16 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 17 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL 12 U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 60] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 60] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 60] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 14000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200]U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 10000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 15000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 15000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 15000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1100] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1100] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1100] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 30000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 30000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 30000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 4600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900]U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 20000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1900] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2200] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2600] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000]U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 3000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1500] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1500] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 1500] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2000] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2800] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C DLL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 2400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5400] U.S. EPA Method 0010 with SW -846 Method 8270C BDL, Reporting limit based on MDL [< 5400]Back Half mass* (ng) Condensate Mass*** (ng) Total Composite (ng)

5 [< 4.8] [< 21.8] 9.2 [< 4.8] [< 26] 11 [< 4.8] [< 27.8] 4.9 [< 0.3] [< 6.7] 6.4 [< 0.3] [< 8.2] 3.6 [< 0.3] [< 5.4] 5.4 [< 1.4] [< 8.6] 5.5 [< 1.4] [< 8.7] 4.5 [< 1.4] [< 7.7] [< 3] [< 3] [< 7.5] [< 3] [< 3] [< 7.5] [< 3] [< 3] [< 7.5] [< 54] [< 3] [< 85] [< 54] [< 3] [< 99] [< 54] [< 3] [< 75] [< 82] [< 2] [< 97] [< 82] [< 2] [< 99] [< 82] [< 2] [< 85.7] [< 3.6] 1.2 [< 10.4] [< 3.6] 1.2 [< 10.4] [< 3.6] [< 1] [< 10.2] [< 3] 1 [< 38] 3.5 0.89 [< 48.39] [< 3] [< 0.8] [< 12.6] [< 5.6] [< 2.8] [< 11.2] [< 5.6] [< 2.8] [< 11.2] [< 5.6] [< 2.8] [< 11.2] [< 3] [< 0.44] [< 4.94] [< 3] 0.58 [< 5.08] [< 3] [< 0.44] [< 4.94] [< 3.6] [< 1.6] [< 8.2] [< 3.6] [< 1.6] [< 8.5] [< 3.6] [< 1.6] [< 7.8] 12 [< 4.8] [< 19.8] 10 [< 4.8] [< 17.8] 11 [< 4.8] [< 18.8] 16 [< 3] [< 25.9] 24 [< 3] [< 35.2] 15 [< 3] [< 30] [< 1.8] [< 2] [< 9.8] [< 1.8] [< 2] [< 10] [< 1.8] [< 2] [< 5.8] 77 [< 17] [< 128] 88 [< 17] [< 149] 86 [< 17] [< 168] [< 460] [< 32] [< 553] [< 460] [< 32] [< 560] Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Test Results[< 460] [< 32] [< 530] [< 3] [< 1.6] [< 6.1] [< 3] [< 1.6] [< 6.1] [< 3] [< 1.6] [< 6.1] 63 [< 22] [< 101] 53 [< 22] [< 92] 51 [< 22] [< 85] 8.6 [< 3.4] [< 72] 9.5 [< 3.4] [< 72.9] 11 [< 3.4] [< 74.4] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6600] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6600] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6600] [< 2200] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 2200] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 2200] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 1700] [< 1900] [< 5600] [< 1700] [< 1900] [< 5600] [< 1700] [< 1900] [< 5600] [< 1800] [< 2400] [< 6600] [< 1800] [< 2400] [< 6600] [< 1800] [< 2400] [< 6600] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6300] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6300] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6300] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 2000] [< 2200] [< 6800] [< 1400] [< 1400] [< 5400] [< 1400] [< 1400] [< 5400] [< 1400] [< 1400] [< 5400] [< 1900] [< 1400] [< 5700] [< 1900] [< 1400] [< 5700] [< 1900] [< 1400] [< 5700] [< 1700] [< 1600] [< 5900] [< 1700] [< 1600] [< 5900] [< 1700] [< 1600] [< 5900] [< 7000] [< 2800] [< 13200] [< 7000] [< 2800] [< 13200] [< 7000] [< 2800] [< 13200] [< 22000] [< 50000] [< 86000] [< 22000] [< 50000] [< 86000] [< 22000] [< 50000] [< 86000] [< 2200] [< 8000] [< 13000] [< 2200] [< 8000] [< 13000] [< 2200] [< 8000] [< 13000] [< 2400] [< 8000] [< 13200] [< 2400] [< 8000] [< 13200] [< 2400] [< 8000] [< 13200] [< 1800] [< 2000] [< 6200] [< 1800] [< 2000] [< 6200] [< 1800] [< 2000] [< 6200] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6100] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6100] [< 1900] [< 2000] [< 6100][< 1700] [< 1400] [< 5300] [< 1700] [< 1400] [< 5300] [< 1700] [< 1400] [< 5300] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 2000] [< 4000] [< 8200] [< 12000] [< 1800] [< 16600] [< 12000] [< 1800] [< 16600] [< 12000] [< 1800] [< 16600] [< 3400] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 3400] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 3400] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 20000] [< 1400] [< 31400] [< 20000] [< 1400] [< 31400] [< 20000] [< 1400] [< 31400] [< 2200] [< 7400] [< 19600] [< 2200] [< 7400] [< 19600] [< 2200] [< 7400] [< 19600] [< 2200] [< 2400] [< 7800] [< 2200] [< 2400] [< 7800] [< 2200] [< 2400] [< 7800] [< 1400] [< 4000] [< 8000] [< 1400] [< 4000] [< 8000] [< 1400] [< 4000] [< 8000] [< 8600] [< 3400] [< 14600] [< 8600] [< 3400] [< 14600] [< 8600] [< 3400] [< 14600] [< 1800] [< 1700] [< 6300] [< 1800] [< 1700] [< 6300] [< 1800] [< 1700] [< 6300] [< 10000] [< 8000] [< 20600] [< 10000] [< 8000] [< 20600] [< 10000] [< 8000] [< 20600] [< 10000] [< 11000] [< 36000] [< 10000] [< 11000] [< 36000] [< 10000] [< 11000] [< 36000] 7000 [< 2000] [< 10100] 5800 [< 2000] [< 8900] 6400 [< 2000] [< 9500] [< 10000] [< 4000] [< 17200] [< 10000] [< 4000] [< 17200] [< 10000] [< 4000] [< 17200] [< 100000] [< 13000] [< 118800] [< 100000] [< 13000] [< 118800] [< 100000] [< 13000] [< 118800] 140000 [< 50000] [< 220000] 120000 [< 50000] [< 200000] 140000 [< 50000] [< 220000] [< 4400] [< 2200] [< 11200] [< 4400] [< 2200] [< 11200] [< 4400] [< 2200] [< 11200] [< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5000][< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5000] [< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5000] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6500] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6500] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6500] [< 15000] [< 3200] [< 21600] [< 15000] [< 3200] [< 21600] [< 15000] [< 3200] [< 21600] [< 2600] [< 3000] [< 9000] [< 2600] [< 3000] [< 9000] [< 2600] [< 3000] [< 9000] [< 1000] [< 2600] [< 6000] [< 1000] [< 2600] [< 6000] [< 1000] [< 2600] [< 6000] [< 1600] [< 1500] [< 5500] [< 1600] [< 1500] [< 5500] [< 1600] [< 1500] [< 5500] [< 1500] [< 2000] [< 6500] [< 1500] [< 2000] [< 6500] [< 1500] [< 2000] [< 6500] [< 1400] [< 1700] [< 5900] [< 1400] [< 1700] [< 5900] [< 1400] [< 1700] [< 5900] [< 2200] [< 3800] [< 9400] [< 2200] [< 3800] [< 9400] [< 2200] [< 3800] [< 9400] [< 3600] [< 2200] [< 9200] [< 3600] [< 2200] [< 9200] [< 3600] [< 2200] [< 9200] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 6600] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 6600] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 6600] [< 1600] [< 1900] [< 5500] [< 1600] [< 1900] [< 5500] [< 1600] [< 1900] [< 5500] [< 20000] [< 8000] [< 48000] [< 20000] [< 8000] [< 48000] [< 20000] [< 8000] [< 48000] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 5900] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 5900] [< 2000] [< 2000] [< 5900] [< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5700] [< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5700] [< 1500] [< 1600] [< 5700] [< 1700] [< 2000] [< 5700] [< 1700] [< 2000] [< 5700] [< 1700] [< 2000] [< 5700] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 1900] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 1800] [< 1900] [< 6300] [< 1800] [< 1900] [< 6300] [< 1800] [< 1900] [< 6300] [< 1700] [< 2400] [< 7100] [< 1700] [< 2400] [< 7100][< 1700] [< 2400] [< 7100] [< 2600] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 2600] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 2600] [< 2200] [< 6300] [< 3400] [< 8000] [< 13400] [< 3400] [< 8000] [< 13400] [< 3400] [< 8000] [< 13400] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 17000] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 17000] [< 3200] [< 11000] [< 17000] 4200 [< 2000] [< 8600] 3400 [< 2000] [< 7800] 3800 [< 2000] [< 8200] [< 3800] [< 8000] [< 17200] [< 3800] [< 8000] [< 17200] [< 3800] [< 8000] [< 17200]Test Method Comments lb/mmBtu ug/dscm @ 7% O2

Method Blank Contaminated [< 8.80E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.05E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.22E-08] [< 2.70E-09] [< 3.30E-09] [< 2.40E-09] [< 3.50E-09] [< 3.50E-09] [< 3.40E-09] [< 3.00E-09] [< 3.00E-09] [< 3.30E-09] [< 3.44E-08] [< 4.00E-08] [< 3.29E-08] [< 3.92E-08] [< 4.00E-08] [< 3.75E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 4.20E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 4.20E-09] [< 4.50E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.54E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.96E-08] [< 5.50E-09] [< 4.50E-09] [< 4.50E-09] [< 4.90E-09] [< 2.00E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 2.10E-09] [< 2.20E-09] [< 3.30E-09] [< 3.40E-09] [< 3.40E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 8.00E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 7.20E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 8.20E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.05E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.42E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 1.31E-08] [< 4.00E-09] [< 4.00E-09] [< 2.50E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 5.18E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 6.02E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 7.36E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 2.24E-07] Method Blank Contaminated [< 2.26E-07] Calculated Emission RateMethod Blank Contaminated [< 2.32E-07] [< 2.50E-09] [< 2.50E-09] [< 2.70E-09] Method Blank Contaminated [< 4.08E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 3.72E-08] Method Blank Contaminated [< 3.72E-08] [< 2.91E-08] [< 2.95E-08] [< 3.26E-08] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.89E-06] [< 2.75E-06] [< 2.75E-06] [< 2.98E-06] [< 2.26E-06] [< 2.26E-06] [< 2.45E-06] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.89E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.76E-06] [< 2.75E-06] [< 2.75E-06] [< 2.98E-06] [< 2.18E-06] [< 2.18E-06] [< 2.37E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.50E-06] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.58E-06] [< 5.34E-06] [< 5.34E-06] [< 5.78E-06] [< 3.48E-05] [< 3.48E-05] [< 3.77E-05] [< 5.26E-06] [< 5.26E-06] [< 5.69E-06] [< 5.34E-06] [< 5.34E-06] [< 5.78E-06] [< 2.51E-06] [< 2.51E-06] [< 2.72E-06] [< 2.47E-06] [< 2.47E-06] [< 2.67E-06][< 2.14E-06] [< 2.14E-06] [< 2.32E-06] [< 3.32E-06] [< 3.32E-06] [< 3.59E-06] [< 3.32E-06] [< 3.32E-06] [< 3.59E-06] [< 6.71E-06] [< 6.71E-06] [< 7.27E-06] [< 4.45E-06] [< 4.45E-06] [< 4.82E-06] [< 1.27E-05] [< 1.27E-05] [< 1.38E-05] [< 7.93E-06] [< 7.92E-06] [< 8.59E-06] [< 3.15E-06] [< 3.15E-06] [< 3.42E-06] [< 3.23E-06] [< 3.23E-06] [< 3.50E-06] [< 5.90E-06] [< 5.90E-06] [< 6.40E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.76E-06] [< 8.33E-06] [< 8.33E-06] [< 9.02E-06] [< 1.46E-05] [< 1.46E-05] [< 1.58E-05] [< 4.08E-06] [< 3.60E-06] [< 4.16E-06] [< 6.95E-06] [< 6.95E-06] [< 7.53E-06] [< 4.80E-05] [< 4.80E-05] [< 5.20E-05] Method Blank Contaminated [< 8.90E-05] Method Blank Contaminated [< 8.09E-05] Method Blank Contaminated [< 9.64E-05] [< 4.53E-06] [< 4.53E-06] [< 4.91E-06] [< 2.02E-06][< 2.02E-06] [< 2.19E-06] [< 2.63E-06] [< 2.63E-06] [< 2.85E-06] [< 8.73E-06] [< 8.73E-06] [< 9.46E-06] [< 3.64E-06] [< 3.64E-06] [< 3.94E-06] [< 2.43E-06] [< 2.43E-06] [< 2.63E-06] [< 2.22E-06] [< 2.22E-06] [< 2.41E-06] [< 2.63E-06] [< 2.63E-06] [< 2.85E-06] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.58E-06] [< 3.80E-06] [< 3.80E-06] [< 4.12E-06] [< 3.72E-06] [< 3.72E-06] [< 4.03E-06] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.67E-06] [< 2.89E-06] [< 2.22E-06] [< 2.22E-06] [< 2.41E-06] [< 1.94E-05] [< 1.94E-05] [< 2.10E-05] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.39E-06] [< 2.58E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.50E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.30E-06] [< 2.50E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.76E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.76E-06] [< 2.87E-06] [< 2.87E-06][< 3.11E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.55E-06] [< 2.76E-06] [< 5.42E-06] [< 5.42E-06] [< 5.87E-06] [< 6.87E-06] [< 6.87E-06] [< 7.45E-06] [< 3.48E-06] [< 3.15E-06] [< 3.59E-06] [< 6.95E-06] [< 6.95E-06] [< 7.53E-06]10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas Moisture (%)9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.910.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.110 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 109.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.9 10.1 10 9.912.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas Flow Rate (scfm)12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,56312.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,25112.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,74212.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563 12.13 7.3 1,292,251 12.16 7.32 1,301,742 12.12 7.28 1,185,563Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type

272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3 272.8 276.4 275.3Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement Method Fuel #2Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Fuel #3Measurement Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Fuel #4Units of Measure Measurement Method

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions. Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationMoisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.

Moisture results recorded for Run 2 are considered suspect because of the high volume of water recorded during recovery. Average moisture results from Runs 2 & 3 were therefore used in the flow rate calculation to convert to dry conditions.EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

1 6/4/2010 8:33 6/4/2010 2 6/4/2010 11:35 6/4/2010 3 6/4/2010 14:44 6/4/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

9:56 [<0.0209] Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) 13:54 [<0.0204] Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) 16:18 [<0.0224] Dry U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL DL based on MDL [<2.21E-05] 11.04 12.25 BDL DL based on MDL [<2.15E-05] 11.22 12.2 BDL DL based on MDL [<2.36E-05] 11.46 12.11 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 7.28 1,289,888 267.9 7.26 1,279,139 275.5 7.31 1,270,532 278.7 Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMeasured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments Calculated

Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeMeasured NO (ppm) Test End Time Test End DateMeasured NO 2(ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used NOXEmission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Test Method Comments (lb/mmBtu) Total NOXCalculated Emission Rateppmdv @ 7% O 2 Flue Gas O 2(%) Calculated Emission Rate Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas

CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID IN_W abash River Station Wa bash River Station Unit 4

Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimeTotal Dissolved Solids (mg solids/liter) Total Suspended Solids (mg solids/liter) Test End Time Test End DateTest Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DDL) Constisuent Emission Test ResultsTest Method Comments Fuel Input Rate Flue Gas Temperat ure (F) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat Input

(mmBtu/hr)Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel #4 Fuel #3Other Supporting Information