alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Series 27-2006 L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            March
      30, 2008
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP 50 South Tenth Street
Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: March 7, 2008               /s/ George J. Carter
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  George J. Carter
                                  President (Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered March 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01358-CV

GREGORY VON LEE, Appellant

V.

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-03665-A

ORDER

By letter dated March 11, 2019, the Court informed appellant his brief was deficient and 

instructed him to file, by March 21, 2019, an amended brief correcting the noted deficiencies. 

On March 20, 2019, appellant filed both an amended brief and a motion requesting a fourteenday extension of time to file an amended brief. The amended brief fails to correct the 

deficiencies noted in the March 11 letter. In his motion, appellant explains that he is seeking 

legal help with his brief. We GRANT the motion as follows. We STRIKE the amended brief. 

We ORDER appellant to file, by April 12, 2019, an amended brief correcting the deficiencies 

noted in this Court’s March 11 letter. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in 

dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL AND EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summit Growth Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Rozelle, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 7, 2009



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph Rozelle                                                  
|Joseph Rozelle
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Report for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10:30 a.m., Thursday, March 17, 2022

# PLACE:

                        Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                        *www.ncua.gov*) and access the provided webcast link.                    

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. NCUA's 2022-2026 Strategic Plan.

2. NCUA's 2022 Annual Performance Plan.

3. Board Briefing, Corporate System Resolution Update.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-05495 Filed 3-14-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0948 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0948

**2002/948/EC: Commission Decision of 29 November 2002 on a Community financial contribution to expenditure by Portugal on establishing the Community vineyard register (notified under document number C(2002) 4780) **

*
Official Journal L 328 , 05/12/2002 P. 0021 - 0022 *

Commission Decision

of 29 November 2002

on a Community financial contribution to expenditure by Portugal on establishing the Community vineyard register

(notified under document number C(2002) 4780)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(2002/948/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 of 24 July 1986 establishing a Community vineyard register(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1631/98(2), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,

After consulting the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund Committee,

Whereas:

(1) Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 states that the Community is to contribute 50 % of the actual cost of establishing the Community vineyard register in the Member States and of the investment in data-processing facilities needed to manage the register.

(2) On the basis of Article 9(3) of that Regulation, an advance has been paid to Portugal. It is to be deducted from the total amount of the Community contribution.

(3) Under Article 9(4) of that Regulation, Articles 8 and 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999(3) apply to the Community contribution to establishing the vineyard register.

(4) Portugal has sent the Commission the documents needed to decide on the amount to be defrayed as expenditure incurred in establishing the register.

(5) The Commission has carried out the checks provided for in Article 9(2) of Council Regulations (EEC) No 729/70(4) and (EC) No 1258/1999.

(6) In the light of the checks carried out, some of the expenditure declared by Portugal does not meet the statutory requirements provided for in Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 and therefore may not be funded by the Community.

(7) Under Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86, the final date for establishing the register in Portugal was 31 December 2000. A Community contribution should therefore be refused for expenditure on work completed after that date.

(8) A breakdown of the amounts to be defrayed and the amounts to be excluded for failure to comply with Community rules was sent to Portugal on 23 October 2002,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Community contribution to the expenditure incurred by Portugal in establishing the Community vineyard register shall be as set out in the table annexed to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 31.7.1986, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 210, 28.7.1998, p. 14.

(3) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(4) OJ L 94, 28.4.1970, p. 13.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 41

Expressing the sense of the Congress that The George Washington University

is important to the Nation and urging that the importance of the University be recognized and celebrated through regular ceremonies.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 7, 1996

Mr. INOUYE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that The George Washington University is important to the Nation and urging

that the importance of the University be recognized and

celebrated through regular ceremonies.

Whereas on February 9, 1821, the United States Congress

chartered Columbian College (renamed The George

Washington University in 1904);

Whereas President James Monroe signed The George Washington University’s charter and attended the University’s

historic first commencement ceremony;

Whereas Congress adjourned to join President Monroe for

The George Washington University’s first commencement

ceremony;
2

•SCON 41 IS

Whereas in 1825 The George Washington University added

a medical curriculum with facilities that throughout the

following years have contributed greatly to the Nation,

including conversion of its teaching infirmary into a military hospital during the Civil War;

Whereas from that time forward, The George Washington

University’s medical facilities have provided treatment to

patients ranging from kings and presidents to the indigent and the homeless;

Whereas The George Washington University has in its 175

years contributed to the educational, cultural, and political enrichment of the Nation through its synergistic associations with the Federal establishment and its branches

and agencies;

Whereas The George Washington University is now the largest higher education institution in the Nation’s capital,

providing educational services to some 19,000 undergraduate, graduate, and professional students annually;

Whereas The George Washington University has rendered

continuing and exemplary service to the country through

the achievement of its educational mission; and

Whereas The George Washington University’s distinguished

alumni hold prominent positions in business, law, government, medicine, and the arts and sciences: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) The George Washington University has

4 been and continues to be of exceptional importance

5 to the Nation; and
3

•SCON 41 IS

1 (2) the importance of The George Washington

2 University should be recognized and celebrated

3 through regular ceremonies.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 777 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 777

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide funding for the 
                     National Institutes of Health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 2015

Ms. Castor of Florida (for herself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. 
Tonko, Mr. Yarmuth, and Mr. Ruiz) introduced the following bill; which 
 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 
to the Committees on the Budget and Appropriations, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide funding for the 
                     National Institutes of Health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanent Investment in Health 
Research Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH.

    (a) Funding.--Paragraph (1) of section 402A(a) of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 282a(a)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--Out of any money in the Treasury not 
        otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of carrying out this 
        title, there are hereby appropriated to the National Institutes 
        of Health, to remain available until expended, the following 
        amounts:
                    ``(A) For fiscal year 2016, $32,000,000,000.
                    ``(B) For each of fiscal years 2017 through 2025, 
                the amount appropriated under this subsection for the 
                preceding fiscal year, adjusted by any percentage 
                increase in nominal gross domestic product during the 
                preceding calendar year.''.
    (b) Conforming Changes.--Section 402A of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 282a) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``authorization of 
        appropriations'' and inserting ``funding''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``Of the amount 
        authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a)'' and 
        inserting ``Of the amount made available under subsection 
        (a)''.
    (c) Exemption From Sequestration Orders.--Subparagraph (A) of 
section 255(g)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)) is amended by inserting before the 
item relating to ``Office of Thrift Supervision'' the following new 
item:
            ``National Institutes of Health (75-9915-0-1-552).''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (i) | The                accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the                three                months ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                                                      |                              |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Dated:                  May                  1, 2007 |                                                                           | /s/                  Michael Gluk |
|                                                 | Michael                    GlukChief                    Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 10.21

[CVRD logo]


                                                                  June 28, 2002


To:      The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

         Re:  Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen")

Dear Sirs:

         Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Temporary Final Rule and
Final Rule "Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients" issued by
this Commission on March 18, 2002 (17 CFR PARTS 210, 228, 229, 230, 240, 249
and 260; RELEASE NOS. 33-8070, 34-45590; 35-27503; 39-2395; IA-2018; IC-25464;
FR-62; File No. S7-03-02 and RIN 3235-AI46), and in view of the audit reports
issued by Arthur Andersen to each of Companhia Hispano-Brasileira de
Politizacao-Hispandobras ("Hispanobras"), Companhia Italo-Brasileira de
Pelotizacao-Itabrasco ("Itabrasco"), and Mineraeao Rio do Norte S.A. ("MRN"),
by its duly authorized representative, Companhia Vale do Rio Doce hereby
declares that it has received copies of the letter dated May 31, 2002 to
Hispanobras, Itabrasco and MRN, containing certain representations from Arthur
Andersen concerning audit quality controls in connection with the audits of the
financial statements of Hispanobras, Itabrasco and MRN as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2001, including representations regarding the continuity of
Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, the availability of national
office consultation, and the availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of
Andersen to conduct relevant portions of the audit.


                                                 Sincerely yours,

                                                 /s/ Gilherme Rodolfo Laager
                                                 Gilherme Rodolfo Laager
                                                 Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00069-CV

Charles R. Randy Turner, Appellant

v.

Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-03-004287, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Charles R. Randy Turner has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. He

certifies that he has conferred with all parties and there is no opposition to the motion. Accordingly,

we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 20, 2015
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Salvador ORTIZ-CHAVIRA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40470

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 13, 2017

*188Andrew R. Gould, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, John Moreno Parras, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges, and STARRETT, District Judge.*

*

 District Judge of the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM: **

The court grants rehearing, withdraws its previous opinion in this matter, *United States v. Ortiz-Chavira,*873 F.3d 473 (5th Cir. 2017), and substitutes the following.

Jose Salvador Ortiz-Chavira (“Ortiz-Chavira”) challenges his term of imprisonment, arguing the district court erroneously applied a 12-level sentencing enhancement based on a previous burglary conviction under Texas law. Before this court issued its opinion, Ortiz-Chavira completed his term of imprisonment on September 1, 2017, and was deported that same day. In view of the foregoing, both parties agree that this appeal is moot. *See United States v. Mejia-Hernandez,*668 Fed.Appx. 555, 556 (5th Cir. 2016); *United States v. Heredia-Holguin,*823 F.3d 337, 342 n.3 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (distinguishing “cases largely involv[ing] situations in which a defendant had completed his term of imprisonment and been deported, yet was still trying to challenge the *term of imprisonment*on the ground that the term of supervised release had not yet expired”).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.'4.