alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         15,674,150
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     454,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,166,376
<PP&E>                                          2,391,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,240,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,722,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,079,831
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          154,487
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,488,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,722,712
<SALES>                                           770,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,113,875
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,430,940
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 37,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,317,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,317,065)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,317,065)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.24)
        


</TABLE>
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 6/20/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES HILL THOMAS, true name John

Westley Dailey,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 95-6403

(D. Ct. No. CR-91-198-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal is from an order sentencing defendant to the maximum sentence under

the applicable guideline range. Defendant appeals on the ground that the district court

failed to state adequate reasons for the sentence at the top of the range. In this case,
- 2 -

defendant was sentenced upon resentencing to a 235 month sentence on counts one and

two of a four count indictment and a 60 month consecutive sentence on count three, for a

total term of 295 months. At the time the district court made the decision to impose the

sentence at the top of the guideline range, the court specifically identified a series of

factors that it took into consideration in establishing the guideline sentence. The district

court is required by 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to state a specific reason for imposing a sentence

at a particular point within the guideline range. The district court, in articulating the

reasons for the guideline sentence, made clear that none of the enhancements that were

added to the base sentence adequately reflected the seriousness of the actions by the

defendant and the danger that he created by engaging in his criminal behavior. Further,

the district court stated specifically additional factual reasons for selecting the particular

sentence. We find that the district court complied adequately with the requirement of 18

U.S.C. § 3553(c) and relied upon the appropriate factors listed on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

We therefore affirm the order of the district court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
Page 1 / 8

Modification Information Document

Modification Information Sheet

The information contained in this document is valid at the time of 

printing and is subject to change without prior notice. In case of discrepancy between the content of this document and any contractual document, the latter shall prevail.

Issue

Date

Printed in France

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999

26

27

28

22 15

16A

17

16

14A

33

32

34

39

38

39

36 37 19

18

14

13

12

11

51

23

42 52 41 24 21 29

25

28

Section concerned :

Table of contents

Modification No.

Proposal No.

Service Bulletin No.

TFU No.

Life/Time/Limits

Interchangeability

Maintenance

Spares

Operations

Weight

Title of modification

Origin/reason

Associated modifications

Localization of repercussions

Classification

ATA Chap. Affect.

TRS Issue

Repercussions on

In case of YES , see 

page 3 for details

Standard 

Specification

For details see relevant 

MSCN/SCN

Modification Information Sheet

Technical Information Sheet 

Sketch(es) 

Repercussion Sheet 

Page 32025

J2211

57-1118

57-26.13.001

Wings - Main structure - Change gear rib busher rib 5

To facilitate maintenance

Minor

57-11

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

/

L1J

1

29 Apr 2002

No

1

2

3 -7

8

22
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

Title of modification 

J2211

32025

Wings - Main structure - Change gear rib busher rib 5

Technical Information Sheet

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 2 / 8

General description

In order to facilitate removal and reinstallation of the MLG aft pintle pin, the modification consists in

making the following changes to the bushes in the gear rib lugs:

- new bushes are introduced with an increased interference fit

- concentricity limits are decreased

- the sealant type is changed, and

- corrosion protection is added by alo-chrome brushing the hole.

Type A318-100/A319-100/A320-200/A321-200
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

32025

J2211

Sketch

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 3 / 8

Sketch 1: 
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

32025

J2211

Sketch

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 4 / 8

Sketch 2: 
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

32025

J2211

Sketch

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 5 / 8

Sketch 3: 
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

32025

J2211

Sketch

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 6 / 8

Sketch 4: 
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

32025

J2211

Sketch

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 7 / 8

Sketch 5: 
Modification No. 

Proposal No. 

Title of modification 

32025

J2211

Wings - Main structure - Change gear rib busher rib 5

Repercussion Sheet

' AIRBUS INDUSTRIE 1999 Page 8 / 8

Weight

Operations

No

Maintenance 

Changes in the SRM chapter 57-26.13.

Spares

Changes in the IPC.

Interchangeability

No

Life/Time/Limits

No

Aircraft Type

Weight

MWE OWE

All Neg Neg
# The Effects of Gasoline Sulfur Level
on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles
in the In

- Use Fleet

Appendix C
Additional Information on

Emission Measurements

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-D-13-003 April 2013

### Appendix C. Additional Information on Emission Measurements

Gaseous emissions (THC, CH4, NOx, CO) were measured using a Horiba MEXA 7200SLE analyzer system. The instrument manufacturer gives the measurement accuracy as ±1% of full scale or ±2% of the relevant calibration point(s).

Particulate matter (PM) was collected by triplicate 47mm Teflon filters for each phase (bag) of the test cycle using a system compliant with 40 CFR Part 1065. The triplicate filter weights were averaged to form a composite result for each test phase. Filters were equilibrated overnight in a clean room environment before taking pre- and post-test weights. Weighing was done using a

Mettler Toledo UMT2 microbalance.

67
**EXHIBIT 15.1**
The Board of DirectorsPowerCerv Corporation
     We are aware of the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-3960,No. 333-90825, and No. 333-90827) of PowerCervCorporation for the registration of 6,490,000 shares of itscommon stock of our report dated October 14, 1999, relatingto the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financialstatements of PowerCerv Corporation that is included in itsForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.
     Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ourreports are not a part of the registration statement prepared orcertified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, FloridaOctober 14, 1999
**Exhibit 15.1**
November 12, 2004
Board of Directors and StockholdersParty City CorporationRockaway, New Jersey
     We have made a review, in accordance withstandards established by the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States), of the unaudited interim financialinformation of Party City Corporation and Subsidiary for thequarter ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003,as indicated in our report dated November 3, 2004; becausewe did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation.
     We are aware that our report referred to above,which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended October 2, 2004, is incorporated byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-75078, 333-65632and 333-19473 on Form S-8 of Party City Corporation.
     We also are aware that the aforementioned report,pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933,is not considered a part of the Registration Statement preparedor certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certifiedby an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 ofthat Act.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C.
               SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                                    CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc.
(formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


January 9, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 18, 2009 |  | /s/ Todd Newton                                  
|                         |  | Todd Newton                                      
|                         |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to ArthroCare Corporation and will be retained by ArthroCare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 19 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 19

            To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 483.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 26 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

 Mr. Packwood submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            To correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 483.
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 483) to amend title XVIII of 
the Social Security Act to permit medicare select policies to be 
offered in all States, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall make the following correction: Amend the title 
so as to read as follows: ``An Act to amend the Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1990 to permit medicare select policies to be 
offered in all States.''.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0926 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0926

**2002/926/EC: Commission Decision of 25 November 2002 amending Decision 2001/556/EC, with respect to Canada for gelatine intended for human consumption (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 4540) **

*
Official Journal L 322 , 27/11/2002 P. 0049 - 0050 *

Commission Decision

of 25 November 2002

amending Decision 2001/556/EC, with respect to Canada for gelatine intended for human consumption

(notified under document number C(2002) 4540)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/926/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Decision 2001/4/EC(2), and in particular Article 2(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Provisional lists of establishments in third countries producing gelatine intended for human consumption have been drawn up by Commission Decision 2001/556/EC of 11 July 2001 drawing up provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of gelatine intended for human consumption(3).

(2) Canada has provided the name of an establishment producing gelatine intended for human consumption for which the competent authorities certify that the establishments are in accordance with the Community rules.

(3) Provisional listing of this establishment can thus be drawn up for Canada. Decision 2001/556/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In the Annex to Decision 2001/556/EC, the following row is added:

"País: CANADÁ/Land: CANADA/Land: KANADA/Χώρα: ΚΑΝΑΔΑΣ/Country: CANADA/Pays: CANADA/Paese: CANADA/Land: CANADA/País: CANADÁ/Maa: KANADA/Land: KANADA"

Article 2

This Decision shall apply as from the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2002.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17.

(2) OJ L 2, 5.1.2001, p. 21.

(3) OJ L 200, 25.7.2001, p. 23.
#### George Frederick DELANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brandon MULLEN, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his official capacity; Jacob T. McNamara, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his official capacity; Kenneth Stolle, Sheriff, sued individually and in his official capacity; Yolanda Vines, R.N., sued individually and in her official capacity; Elizibeth Nicholson, L.P.N., sued individually and in her official capacity; M. Baptiste, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his or her official capacity; B. Orchard, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his or her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

*291No. 17-7178

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

George Frederick Delaney, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Frederick Delaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against some, but not all, Defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Delaney seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Francisco Mendez, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of El Palenque Vivero,
Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.   Date:
 December 23, 2009 /s/ Francisco
Mendez___________________ Francisco
Mendez Principal
Executive and Financial Officer