alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 966 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 383
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 966

       For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 26 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

  Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             April 25, 1996

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO NATHAN C. VANCE.

    (a) Payment.--Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall pay $4,850.00 to Nathan C. Vance of Wyoming for fire 
loss arising out of the Mink Area Fire in and around Yellowstone 
National Park in 1988.
    (b) Source of Funds.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay the 
amount specified in subsection (a) from amounts made available under 
section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.
    (c) Condition of Payment.--The payment made pursuant to subsection 
(a) shall be in full satisfaction of the claim of Nathan C. Vance 
against the United States, for fire loss arising out of the Mink Area 
Fire, that was received by the Forest Service in August 1990.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 383

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 966

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

       For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 25, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Stanley FULLER, also known as Wardy, also known as Webo, Defendant-Appellee, Kamel Lambus, also known as Kamel Angevine, also known as K, also known as Kamel Angenevine, Shavona Trappier, also known as Bobby, Shakeem Powell, also known as Sha, Tyran Trotter, also known as TY, also known as Terry, also known as Terror, Sean Brabram, also known as Grinch, also known as Lye, Tyrone Thomas, also known as Pop, FNU LNU, Scott Williams, Earl Davis, also known as Choice, Michael Scott, also known as Ross, Andre Mitchell, also known as Dre, also known as Bright, Henry Curry, also known as Junior, Kash, Defendants.

17-676-cr

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 4, 2017

For Appellant: Marcia Henry (David C. James, Lauren H. Elbert, on the brief), for Bridget M. Rohde, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY

For Defendant-Appellee: James Kousou-ros, Law Offices of James Kousouros, New York, NY

Present: John M. Walker, Jr., Debra Ann Livingston, Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

The Government appeals from a March 7, 2017 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, *J.)*granting defendant-appellee Stanley Fuller bail pending trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

As a general rule, we review a district court’s bail determination, including its determination as to the adequacy of proposed bail conditions, for clear error. *See United States v. Sabhnani,*493 F.3d 63, 75 (2d Cir. 2007). The Government has represented at oral argument that the record on appeal is complete, and thus the matter ripe for our determination. On the record before us, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in determining that the conditions proposed by the defendant were sufficient to mitigate concerns about risk of flight and the danger the defendant presented to the community, and that Fuller was therefore entitled to release on bail. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court and *680DENY as moot the Government’s motion for a stay pending appeal. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50656

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENITO LOPEZ-MILIAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-219-3)

_________________________________________________________________ March 26, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Benito Lopez-Milian appeals his conviction and sentence for

conspi racy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. The

testimony of appellant’s co-conspirator, which was corroborated by

the testimony of the Customs Agents as well as by circumstantial

evidence, wa s sufficient to support the conviction. S ee United

States v. Greenwood

, 974 F.2d 1449, 1457 (5th Cir. 1992), cert.- 2 -

denied

, 508 U.S. 915 (1993). Further support was provided by

appellant’s conflicting statements at trial and to federal

officials, evidencing his “consciousness of guilt”. S ee United

States v. Diaz-Carreon , 915 F.2d 951, 954-55 (5th Cir. 1990).

Appellant contends that the district court should have granted

him a two-point reduction in his offense level on the basis that he

was a minor participant in the conspiracy. Although the district

court’s denial of appellant’s objection did not contain a

recitation of the factual basis for its denial, the findings in the

presentence investigation report were clear enough that this court

was not left to “second guess” the basis for that sentencing

decision. S ee United States v. Carreo n , 11 F.3d 1225, 1231 (5th

Cir. 1994). The record supports the district court’s conclusion

that appellant was just as culpable as the other participants.

There is no clear error in the decision not to award the reduction.

See United States v. Davis , 19 F.3d 166, 172 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 2 AND 3 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE; AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  190781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (18395)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    190781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18505)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18505)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.2
















CONSENT OF TRACY ARMSTRONG







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the “Technical Study”) concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading “Item III – Description of the Business – Coulon Property – 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,










	
	/s/  Tracy Armstrong


	Name:  Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.



















May 14, 2012
# L_2004218DE.01002001.xml

| 18.6.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 218/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 218/20

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1335/2003 der Kommission vom 25. Juli 2003 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2454/93 mit Durchführungsvorschriften zu der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2913/92 des Rates zur Festlegung des Zollkodex der Gemeinschaften

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 187 vom 26. Juli 2003
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 187 vom 26. Juli 2003

Seite 17, Artikel 870, Absatz 2, Satz 2:

anstatt

„Die Mitteilung nach Absatz 1 ...“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Mitteilung ...“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                       273
<INVENTORY>                                      1,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,167
<PP&E>                                           3,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,818
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,121
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,851
<SALES>                                          5,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,101
<CGS>                                            2,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,480
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,510
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (218)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (674)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (680)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
#### Lesly GATHERIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Haley BARBOUR; Jim Hood; Ben Creekmore; Lon Stallings; Honey Ussery; Mickey Mallette; Calhoun County Mississippi Sheriff's Office; Dewayne Winter; Tracy McGuirt, Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-60149

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed December 13, 2017

Lesly Gatheright, Pro Se

Paul Eldridge Barnes, Esq;, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Ap-pellees Jim Hood, Ben Creekmore, Lon Stallings, Honey Ussery, Mickey Mallette

Daniel J. Griffith, Esq., Jamie Ferguson Jacks, Esq., Mary McKay Lasker, Jacks Griffith Luciano, P.A., Cleveland, MS, for Defendants-Appellees Calhoun County Mississippi Sheriffs Office, Dewayne Winter, Tracy McGuirt

Before KING, DENNIS, arid COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff Lesly Gatheright appeals the dismissal of his claims against several Mississippi state and county actors stemming from his arrest and indictment on two charges of felony bad check. We have carefully considered this appeal in light of the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error in the district court’s dismissal of the claims. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.15

 

TERMINATION AND RELEASE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 

Dated as of May 11, 2012

 

Reference is made to the Guarantee dated as of August 11, 2011 (the “Guarantee”) by FS Energy and Power Fund (the “Guarantor”) in favor of Citibank, N.A. (the “Beneficiary”).

 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Guarantee.

 

Release of Guarantee

 

1.             Each of the Guarantor and the Beneficiary hereby acknowledges and agrees that, as of the date of this Termination and Release Acknowledgement, the Guarantor is hereby released from all obligations under the Guarantee.

 

2.             Each of the Guarantor and the Beneficiary hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Guarantee shall be terminated and of no further force or effect.

 

Miscellaneous

 

1.             This Termination and Release Acknowledgement may be executed in any number of counterparts and on separate counterparts, each of which is an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same instrument.  Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Termination and Release Acknowledgement by e-mail (PDF) or telecopy shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Termination and Release Acknowledgement.

 

2.             This Termination and Release Acknowledgement shall be construed in accordance with, and this Termination and Release Acknowledgement and all matters arising out of or relating in any way whatsoever to this Termination and Release Acknowledgement (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) shall be governed by, the law of the State of New York.

 











 

Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth the terms of our agreement by having a duly authorized officer of Guarantor execute this Termination and Release Acknowledgement and return the same by e-mail (PDF) to the attention of Victoria Chant at Citibank.

 

	
Very truly yours,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
CITIBANK, N.A.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Victoria Chant
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Victoria Chant
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Vice President
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACKNOLWEDGED AND AGREED
    	
 
    
	
AS OF THE DATE FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
FS ENERGY AND POWER FUND
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Gerald F. Stahlecker
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:   Gerald F. Stahlecker
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:   Executive Vice President
    	
 
    


 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 26 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 26

 To authorize the Newington-Cropsey Foundation to erect on the Capitol 
 Grounds and present to Congress and the people of the United States a 
               monument dedicated to the Bill of Rights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            September 7 (legislative day, September 5), 1995

   Mr. Lott submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the Newington-Cropsey Foundation to erect on the Capitol 
 Grounds and present to Congress and the people of the United States a 
               monument dedicated to the Bill of Rights.
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION.

    The Newington-Cropsey Foundation is authorized to erect on the 
Capitol Grounds and present to Congress and the people of the United 
States a monument dedicated to the Bill of Rights (referred to as the 
``monument''). The monument shall be erected without expense to the 
United States.

SEC. 2. DESIGN AND REVIEW.

    The design and plans for the monument shall be subject to review 
and approval by the Architect of the Capitol. The monument shall be 
erected on a site to be determined by the Architect of the Capitol, 
subject to the approval of the Committee on Rules and Administration of 
the Senate and the Committee on House Oversight of the House of 
Representatives and in consultation with the Newington-Cropsey 
Foundation.

SEC. 3. ACCEPTANCE OF MONUMENT.

    After the completion of the monument according to the approved 
plans and specifications, the monument shall be accepted by the 
Congress on behalf of the people of the United States for permanent 
placement on the Capitol Grounds.
                                 <all>
```
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 622 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction of State and local general sales 

taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 622 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Sales 

3 Tax Deduction Fairness Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION OF STATE 

5 AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(5) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subpara8 graph (I). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2014. 

12 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act shall not be entered 

14 on either PAYGO scorecard maintained pursuant to sec15 tion 4(d) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 16, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 622 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

general sales taxes. make permanent the deduction of State and local
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Beverly Allen BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6981

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

Beverly Allen Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Phillip Anthony Rubin, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Beverly Allen Baker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately .presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
S. 966

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO NATHAN C. VANCE.

(a) PAYMENT.—Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary

of Agriculture shall pay $4,850.00 to Nathan C. Vance of Wyoming

for fire loss arising out of the Mink Area Fire in and around

Yellowstone National Park in 1988.

(b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

pay the amount specified in subsection (a) from amounts made

available under section 1304 of title 31, United States Code.

(c) CONDITION OF PAYMENT.—The payment made pursuant to

subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of the claim of Nathan

C. Vance against the United States, for fire loss arising out of

the Mink Area Fire, that was received by the Forest Service in

August 1990.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.