alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 34.3**

Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

We have examined management’s assertion,included in the accompanying Report on Compliance with Applicable ServicingCriteria Pursuant to Item 1122 of Regulation AB under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, that FDI Collateral Management (the “Company’’), a wholly-ownedsubsidiary of Trivin, Inc., complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for thetitle servicing platform as of and for the year-ended December 31, 2006, exceptfor 1122(d)(l)(ii)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii)(D), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv) and1122(d)(4)(iii)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable tothe activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform coveredby this report. See Management’s Assertion for the asset backed transactionscovered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Company’scompliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactionsand securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of theservicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether theCompany processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, ourprocedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurredeither prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balancesor amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered bythis report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management’s assertion that theCompany complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for theyear-ended December 31, 2006 for the title servicing platform is fairly stated,in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

February 26, 2007

** **

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6341 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6341

  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2016

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To delay the amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal 
                               Procedure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Review the Rule Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the order entered by the Supreme 
Court of the United States on April 28, 2016--
            (1) effective on the date of enactment of this Act, rule 41 
        of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is amended to read 
        as it read on November 17, 2016; and
            (2) the proposed amendments to rule 41 of the Federal Rules 
        of Criminal Procedure set forth in such order shall take effect 
        on July 1, 2017.
    (b) Applicability.--Notwithstanding the amendment made by 
subsection (a)(1), for any warrant issued under rule 41 of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure during the period beginning on December 1, 
2016, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, such rule 41, as 
was in effect on the date on which the warrant was issued, shall apply 
with respect to the warrant.
                                 <all>
```
IV

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 21

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1995

Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas in 1995, women of America are celebrating the 75th

anniversary of their right to participate in our government through suffrage;

Whereas Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Susan

B. Anthony were pioneers in the movement for women

suffrage and the pursuit of equal rights; and

Whereas, the relocation of the ‘‘Portrait Monument’’ to a

place of prominence and esteem in the Capitol Rotunda

would serve to honor and revere the contribution of thousands of women: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Architect of the Capitol shall—

3 (1) restore the ‘‘Portrait Monument’’ to its

4 original state and place it in the Rotunda of the

5 United States Capitol; and
2

SCON 21 RFH

1 (2) make all necessary arrangements for the re2 dedication ceremony of such statue in the Capitol

3 Rotunda and procession connected therewith, in co4 operation with the 75th Anniversary of Woman Suf5 frage Task Force.

6 SEC. 2. The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to

7 be used from 7 o’clock ante meridiem until 4 o’clock post

8 meridiem on August 26, 1995, for such ceremony.

Passed the Senate July 17 (legislative day, July 10),

1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge and upon a review of
the Report that:

     (1) The Report of the Company filled today pursuant to Section 12(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ( the "Exchange Act"), fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
     Act; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.

  Dated: November 19, 2007                  /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |      |                                  |   |
|----------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 31, 2011 | By:  | /s/ Adiv Baruch                       |   |
|                 |      | Adiv Baruch                           |   |
|                 |      | Chief Executive Officer and President |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 3.1(b)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                   FIRST RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                       APPLIED GRAPHICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.




                  Applied Graphics Technologies, Inc., a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law
("DGCL") (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify pursuant to Section 242 of the
DGCL:

                  FIRST: That, at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of
the Corporation held on February 13, 1998, the Board of Directors of the
Corporation duly adopted a resolution setting forth a proposed amendment to the
First Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended,
declaring such amendment advisable, and submitted the amendment to the
stockholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

                  RESOLVED, that the First Restated Certificate of
         Incorporation, as amended, of the Corporation be, and the same hereby
         is, amended as follows:

                  1. By amending Article FOURTH thereof so that, as amended, it
         reads in its entirety as follows:

                                 "ARTICLE FOURTH
                                  CAPITAL STOCK

                           The Corporation shall have the authority to issue a
                  total of 160,000,000 shares of capital stock, each with a par
                  value of $0.01, consisting of 150,000,000 shares of Common
                  Stock and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock."

                  SECOND: That, at a Special Meeting in Lieu of an Annual
         Meeting of the Stockholders of the Corporation held on May 27, 1998,
         the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock entitled to
         vote thereon, and a majority of the holders of each class of stock
         entitled to vote thereon as a class, voted in favor of the amendment.
<PAGE>   2
                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, APPLIED GRAPHICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has
caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer on this 27th day of May, 1998.


                                   APPLIED GRAPHICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                   By:_________________________________
                                          Louis Salamone, Jr.
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Record of Contacts

Docket No. FAA
- 2012
- 0727 Directorate Identifier: 2012
- NM - 012
- AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  ORGANIZATION PERSON CON TACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Bob Takara 11/8/2011 A4A Mike Bianchi 01/10/2012

Other/Additional Information:
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0243 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0243

**2003/243/EC: Commission Decision of 3 March 2003 amending for the 13th time Decision 2000/284/EC establishing the list of approved semen collection centres for imports of equine semen from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 1109) **

*
Official Journal L 089 , 05/04/2003 P. 0026 - 0038 *

Commission Decision

of 3 March 2003

amending for the 13th time Decision 2000/284/EC establishing the list of approved semen collection centres for imports of equine semen from third countries

(notified under document number C(2003) 1109)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/243/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992, laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(I) to Directive 90/425/EEC(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1282/2002(2), and in particular Article 17(3)(b) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 2000/284/EC(3), as last amended by Decision 2003/101/EC(4), established the list of approved semen collection centres for imports of equine semen from third countries.

(2) The competent authorities of the United States of America officially informed the Commission of the approval in accordance with the provisions of Directive 92/65/EEC of additional equine semen collection centres.

(3) It is appropriate to amend the list of approved centres in the light of new information received from the third countries concerned, and to highlight the amendments in the Annex for clarity.

(4) Decision 2000/284/EC should be amended accordingly.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 2000/284/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54.

(2) OJ L 187, 16.7.2002, p. 3.

(3) OJ L 94, 14.4.2000, p. 35.

(4) OJ L 41, 14.2.2003, p. 46.

ANNEX

"ANEXO/BILAG/ANHANG/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ/ANNEX/ANNEXE/ALLEGATO/BIJLAGE/ANEXO/LIITE/BILAGA

>TABLE>"
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0912 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0912

**2003/912/EC: Council Decision of 17 December 2003 amending Decision 95/408/EC on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third-country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs, as regards the extension of its validity **

*
Official Journal L 345 , 31/12/2003 P. 0112 - 0112 *

Council Decision

of 17 December 2003

amending Decision 95/408/EC on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third-country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs, as regards the extension of its validity

(2003/912/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third-country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs(1), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) Decision 95/408/EC expires on 31 December 2003.

(2) The Commission proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down detailed rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption(2) (the Regulation for the organisation of official controls) provides for a new procedure for drawing up lists of establishments in third countries intended to replace the rules laid down in Decision 95/408/EC.

(3) The validity of Decision 95/408/EC should be extended to bridge the gap between the expiry of that Decision and the entry into force of the Regulation for the organisation of official controls.

(4) Decision 95/408/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 9 of Decision 95/408/EC "31 December 2003" shall be replaced by "31 December 2005".

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2003.

For the Council

The President

G. Alemanno

(1) OJ L 243, 11.10.1995, p. 17. Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(2) OJ C 262 E, 29.10.2002, p. 449.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 945

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor Act of 1984

to modify the boundaries of the corridor, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. SIMON (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Illinois and Michigan Canal Heritage Corridor

Act of 1984 to modify the boundaries of the corridor,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES.

4 Section 104(b)(1) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal

5 National Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–

6 398; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking para7 graph (1) and inserting the following:
2

•S 945 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The corridor shall consist

2 of the Joliet Army Ammunition Plant in the State

3 of Illinois and the areas depicted on—

4 ‘‘(A) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michi5 gan Canal National Heritage Corridor’, dated

6 May 1983 and numbered IMC–80,000;

7 ‘‘(B) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michi8 gan Canal National Heritage Corridor—Bound9 ary Definition for portions of the Corridor East

10 of Harlem Avenue’, dated llllll and

11 numbered llllll; and

12 ‘‘(C) the map entitled ‘Illinois and Michi13 gan Canal National Heritage Corridor—Bound14 ary Definition for the Lake Renwick Zone’,

15 dated llllll and numbered

16 llllll,

17 each of which maps shall be on file and available for

18 public inspection in the offices of the Commission

19 and in the offices of the National Park Service.’’.

20 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DURATION OF COMMISSION.

21 Section 111(a) of the Illinois and Michigan Canal Na22 tional Heritage Corridor Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–398;

23 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking ‘‘ten’’ and

24 inserting ‘‘20’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Futures Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2006
#### XIONGMING WANG, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-72619

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 13, 2017 * Honolulu, Hawaii

Filed November 24, 2017

Jisheng Li, Attorney, Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner

Matthew Allan Spurlock, Attorney, OIL, Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips, Esquire, Trial, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument, *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Xiongming Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“I J”) decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Our appellate jurisdiction rests on 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we DENY the petition.

Wang’s application is governed by the standards of the REAL ID Act. *See Ren v. Holder,*648 F.3d 1079, 1084 (9th Cir. 2011). We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence and only reverse the BIA’s decision if the evidence compels it. *See Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010); *I.N.S, v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

The IJ found inconsistencies, omissions, and implausibilities between Petitioner’s testimony and his asylum application surrounding, for example, his nonpayment of the fine and’ his payment of 180,000 yuan to a “snakehead,” and the implausibility of Petitioner’s accounts of his confrontation with the family planning officials. Under the totality of the circumstances, these inconsistencies, omissions, and implausibilities undermined Petitioner’s veracity and thus constituted substantial evidence in support of the adverse credibility finding. *See Shrestha,*590 F.3d at 1044.

As the BIA correctly found, absent credible testimony, Petitioner’s corroborating evidence was insufficient independently to *630establish entitlement to asylum. Petitioner therefore also failed to satisfy his higher burden for showing entitlement to withholding of removal. *See Kumar v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 520, 525 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,