alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ·~ 

# NLJ. 08 L012 2010115 PFOA Stewardship

### Pro~q\'r:·.· · 

### -? :.'.: [.: 

## 0-1 DuPont Submission ll 1 ' ·- ' -

Document Date 10.31.12 10.31.12 

# OPPT -2006-0621 Index of Documents - Public Version
Document Transmittal letter for report CBI October 31,2012 Page 1 of 1

Number of Pages 1 5 10.31.12 Appendix D- Facility Report on Product Content - Aqueous Fluoropo1ymer Dispersion 5 10.31.12 10.31.12 10.31.12 10.31.12 Appendix D- Facility Report on Product Content- Fluoroelastomers Appendix D- Facility Report on Product Content- Fluorotelomers Appendix F - Company Annual Report Summary of Reductions in Emissions and Product Content CBI (Attachments) 

# IIIIJ!IIjiiiJIIIJ!i

# ~~~**~~~ ~li** **\Ill~~~ ~II** **~II** I 

# j**II~** II Ill Company Sanitized 6 7
3 10

COMPANY SANITIZED PUBLIC COPY OCTOBER 31,2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         April 14, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1037, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alumit Ishai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Grants Management and Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1037, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9539,                         *alumit.ishai@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 10, 2022. 

David W. Freeman, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05485 Filed 3-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.2.1

                                BY-LAW AMENDMENT


         The following amendment to the By-laws of Daisytek International
Corporation ("Daisytek") was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of
Daisytek by a unanimous written consent dated June 26, 2002. Section 2.9 of
ARTICLE TWO of the By-laws shall be deleted and restated in its entirety to read
as follows:

                  "2.9 Method of Voting; Proxies. Except as otherwise provided
         in the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation or by law, each
         outstanding share of capital stock, regardless of class, shall be
         entitled to one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of
         stockholders. Elections of directors need not be by written ballot. At
         any meeting of stockholders, every stockholder having the right to vote
         may vote (a) in person, (b) by a proxy executed in writing by the
         stockholder or by his duly authorized attorney-in-fact or (c) by a
         proxy that is transmitted electronically, including, but not limited
         to, telephonic votes and votes over the internet, to the extent such
         electronic method of voting is permitted by Delaware Corporation Law.
         Each such proxy shall be filed with the Secretary of the Corporation
         before or at the time of the meeting. No proxy shall be valid after
         three years from the date of its execution, unless otherwise provided
         in the proxy. If no date is stated in a proxy, such proxy shall be
         presumed to have been executed on the date of the meeting at which it
         is to be voted. Each proxy shall be revocable unless expressly provided
         therein to be irrevocable and coupled with an interest sufficient in
         law to support an irrevocable power or unless otherwise made
         irrevocable by law."
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anthony Glyn WAGNER, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50243 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

*360Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Anthony Glyn Wagner, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony Glyn Wagner has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Wagner has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14328-14329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05256]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Notice of the Department of Veterans Affairs: Recommendations for 
Modernization or Realignment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) 
Facilities

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is 
required to develop recommendations regarding the modernization or 
realignment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. This 
notice serves as documentation for the public record that the 
Secretary's recommendations to the Asset and Infrastructure Review 
(AIR) Commission have been submitted and are available to the public at 
https://www.va.gov/aircommissionreport.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie Mattison Brown, Chief Strategy 
Officer, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7100.

[[Page 14329]]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Subtitle A of Title II of the Maintaining 
Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks 
(MISSION) Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-182), requires the Secretary to 
submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the 
House of Representatives and to the AIR Commission a report detailing 
recommendations for the modernization or realignment of VHA facilities 
developed utilizing the final criteria published in the Federal 
Register on May 28, 2021.

Signing Authority

    Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this 
document on March 8, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and 
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for 
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

Michael P. Shores,
Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of General 
Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2022-05256 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
Amendment No. Two to 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
 SAIC, INC. 2006 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
 Amendment No. Two

 Effective immediately, the SAIC, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

Section 11 of the plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 11. Payment of Purchase Price; Changes in Payroll Deductions; Issuance of Shares. 
 (a) The
purchase price of the shares is accumulated by regular payroll deductions made during each Offering Period. The deductions are made as a percentage of the participant’s compensation in one percent (1%) increments, not less than one percent
(1%), nor greater than ten percent (10%), or such lower limit set by the Committee. Compensation shall mean, in the case of employees subject to tax in the United States, all W-2 cash compensation, including, but not limited to, base salary, wages,
bonuses, incentive compensation, commissions, overtime, shift premiums, plus draws against commissions, provided, however that compensation shall not include any long term disability or workers’ compensation payments, car allowances, relocation
payments, expense reimbursements or payment of dividends on non-vested stock or payments representing dividends on stock units or stock rights and further provided, however, that for purposes of determining a participant’s compensation, any
election by such participant to reduce his or her regular cash remuneration under Sections 125 or 401(k) of the Code shall be treated as if the participant did not make such election. In the case of employees not subject to tax in the United States,
the Committee shall establish a comparable definition of compensation. Payroll deductions shall commence on the first payday of the Offering Period and shall continue to the end of the Offering Period unless sooner altered or terminated as provided
in this Plan. If payroll deductions are not permitted in a jurisdiction, participants in that jurisdiction may contribute via check or pursuant to another method approved by the Committee. 

 

			
	SAIC, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lucy K. Moffitt

		 	Lucy K. Moffitt
		
	Its:	 	 Vice President for Finance
# EUR-Lex - 32003R2319 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R2319

**Council Regulation (EC) No 2319/2003 of 17 December 2003 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco **

*
Official Journal L 345 , 31/12/2003 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Council Regulation (EC) No 2319/2003

of 17 December 2003

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 37 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament(1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee(2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92(3), the Community Tobacco Fund is to be financed by deductions of 2 % and 3 % respectively from the premiums for the 2002 and 2003 harvests.

(2) The reform of the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco, which also covers the Community Tobacco Fund, is currently being drawn up. The new rules are not due to take effect until 2005. A deduction percentage therefore needs to be set for 2004, and in the transitional context it should be maintained at the same level as in 2003.

(3) According to the conclusions of the report on utilisation of the Community Tobacco Fund presented by the Commission to the Council pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92, a 3 % deduction will be sufficient to cover the fund's prospective expenditure.

(4) Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 therefore needs to be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 is hereby replaced by the following:

"1. A Community Tobacco Fund (hereafter 'the Fund') shall be set up, financed by a deduction of:

- 2 % from the premium for the 2002 harvest, and

- 3 % from the premium for the 2003 and 2004 harvests."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2003.

For the Council

The President

G. Alemanno

(1) Opinion of 16 December 2003 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(2) Opinion of 10 December 2003 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 70. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).
#### Rigoberto RAMIREZ-JUAREZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-72641

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Carlos Alfredo Cruz, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Carlos A. Cruz, Alhambra, CA, for'Petitioner

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Craig Alan Newell, Jr., Esquire, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rigoberto Ramirez-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying a motion to continue. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 *660U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion |he agency’s denial of a motion to continue, and review de novo constitutional claims. *See Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate cjue process in denying Ramirez-Juarez’s motion for a fourth continuance, where the IJ advised him that no further continuances would be granted, and he failed to establish good cause. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an IJ “may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown”); *Sandoval-Luna,*526 F.3d at 1247; *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien must show error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Ramirez-Juarez’s unexhausted contention that the agency failed to properly analyze his motion for a fourth continuance. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to consider a legal claim not presented in administrative proceedings below).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Peter SZANTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARINA MARKET PLACE 2, LLC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15181

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*579Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 21, 2017

Peter Szanto, Pro Se

James J. Rankl, Esquire, Attorney, James J. Rankl, Attorney at Law, P.C., Carson City, NV, for Defendants-Appel-lees

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Peter Szanto appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his diversity action alleging state law claims related to a family trust. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s order dismissing an action under its inherent authority. *Chambers v. NASCO, Inc.,*501 U.S. 32, 55, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Szanto’s action after finding that Szanto failed to effect timely service on defendants and that he misrepresented facts to the court on two separate occasions indicating otherwise. *See id.*at 44, 111 S.Ct. 2123.

We reject as unsupported by the record Szanto’s contentions concerning bias of the district judge.

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal or matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Donald L. SPENCER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Director of Va. Dept. of Corr., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7711

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

Donald L. Spencer, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald L. Spencer seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive and unauthorized his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Spencer has not made the requisite showing, Accordingly, we deny Spencer’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny him leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process,

*DISMISSED*
# EUR-Lex - 32003R2081 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R2081

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 of 27 November 2003 on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 313 , 28/11/2003 P. 0011 - 0020 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003

of 27 November 2003

on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 of 22 May 1995 relating to the trading of goods by the Community and its Member States with non-member countries(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 374/98(2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1779/2002 of 4 October 2002 on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States(3) set out the version valid on 1 January 2003.

(2) The alphabetical coding of countries and territories is based on the ISO alpha 2 standard in force as far as it is compatible with the requirements of Community legislation.

(3) Changes affecting some codes make it necessary to draw up a new version of the nomenclature.

(4) It is nevertheless preferable to provide for a transition period to allow certain Member States to adapt to the amendments made; it is essential for purposes of simplification for this transition period to end when the provisions revising the rules on the Single Administrative Document come into force.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with opinion of the Committee on Statistics relating to the trading of goods with non-member countries,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The version valid from 1 January 2004 of the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States is set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2004.

However, the Member States may use the three-digit numerical codes also shown in the Annex to the Regulation until the provisions revising Annexes 37 and 38 to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 come into force(4).

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2003.

For the Commission

Pedro Solbes Mira

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 118, 25.5.1995, p. 10.

(2) OJ L 48, 19.2.1998, p. 6.

(3) OJ L 269, 5.10.2002, p. 6.

(4) OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

ANNEX

NOMENCLATURE OF COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES FOR THE EXTERNAL TRADE STATISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY AND STATISTICS OF TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

(Version valid with effect from 1 January 2004)

>TABLE>