alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         298,592
<SECURITIES>                                     5,896
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,250
<PP&E>                                          57,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          471,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           362
<OTHER-SE>                                     419,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,096
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0882 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0882

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 882/2002 of 28 May 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 2441/2001 opening a standing invitation to tender for the export to zone VII of rye from the 2001 harvest held by the German intervention agency **

*
Official Journal L 139 , 29/05/2002 P. 0023 - 0023 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 882/2002

of 28 May 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 2441/2001 opening a standing invitation to tender for the export to zone VII of rye from the 2001 harvest held by the German intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/2000(2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1630/2000(4), lays down the procedures and conditions for the sale of cereals held by the intervention agencies.

(2) A later date must be set for the last partial invitation to tender for the tender opened by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2441/2001(5).

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2441/2001 is replaced by the following: "3. The last partial invitation to tender shall expire on 22 May 2003, at 9 a.m. (Brussels time)."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 May 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 191, 31.7.1993, p. 76.

(4) OJ L 187, 26.7.2000, p. 24.

(5) OJ L 329, 14.12.2001, p. 20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006027
<NAME> BACOU USA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,705,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,867,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                   956,683
<INVENTORY>                                 24,888,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,633,808
<PP&E>                                      33,982,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             157,384,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,051,053
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,571
<OTHER-SE>                                 119,411,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               157,384,977
<SALES>                                     94,455,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            94,455,271
<CGS>                                       45,184,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,184,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,628,610
<INCOME-TAX>                                 8,798,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,830,471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,830,471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62
        

</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 41

To provide for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a citizen regent of

the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24, 1995

Mr. MOYNIHAN (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

To provide for the appointment of Louis Gerstner as a

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents

5 of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than

6 Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the resigna7 tion of Ira Michael Heyman of California on May 27,

8 1994, is filled by the appointment of Louis Gerstner of

9 Connecticut. The appointment is for a term of six years
2

•SJ 41 IS

1 and shall take effect on the date on which this joint resolu2 tion becomes law.

Æ
#### Andrew I. PHILIPSBORN, as Trustee ON BEHALF OF the THOMAS D. PHILIPSBORN IRREVOCABLE INSURANCE TRUST Dated July 10, 2005, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AVON CAPITAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Appeal of: TPG Group, Inc., Claimant.

No. 17-3044

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted October 4, 2017 *

Decided October 6, 2017

*.*John William Moynihan, Cooney Corso & Moynihan, LLC, Downers Grove, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Kelly S. Hadac, HKM, P.A., ST. Paul, MN, for Defendants-Appelleés.

Before Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge, Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge, Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge

*

 This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b).

Order

This case is remanded for further proceedings in light of *Thomas D. Philipsborn Irrevocable Insurance Trust v. Avon Capital, LLC,*No. 15-3368, — Fed.Appx. -, 2017 WL 4465539 (7th Cir. Oct. 5, 2017) (nonprecedential disposition).
Exhibit 10.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Companhia
Vale do Rio Doce for the year ended December 31, 2001 of our report dated March
28, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Companhia Vale
do Rio Doce and its subsidiaries, which appears in such Annual Report. We also
consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts"and "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" in such Annual Report.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Auditores Independentes

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
June 26, 2002
#### Susan Mae POLK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-17141

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017 *

Filed July 3, 2017

Susan Mae Polk, Pro Se

Colin A. Wood, Office of the County Counsel, Contra Costa County, Martinez, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*920MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner and Chapter 7 debtor Susan Mae Polk appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court order denying her motion to avoid a lien and denying injunc-tive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158 and 1291. We review de novo a district court’s decision on appeal from a bankruptcy court, and review a bankruptcy court’s decision independently, without deference to the district court’s decision. *In re JTS Corp.,*617 F.3d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010). We review de novo the bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law de novo and for clear error its findings of fact. *Id.*We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly denied Polk’s motion to avoid the County’s lien because the County’s lien was consensual and arose from the promissory note and deed of trust, not a judicial lien that could be avoided under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f). *See In re Chiu,*304 F.3d 905, 908 (9th Cir. 2002) (under § 522(f), the lien to be avoided must be a judicial lien).

The bankruptcy court properly denied Polk’s motion for injunctive relief because the County did not retain Polk’s property in violation of the discharge injunction. *See*11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(2); *Zilog, Inc. v. Corning,*450 F.3d 996, 1007-08 (9th Cir. 2006) (requirements for establishing violation of the discharge injunction).

The bankruptcy court properly declined to consider Polk’s substantive and procedural challenges to state court orders because her challenges fell outside the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction. *See Bell v. City of Boise,*709 F.3d 890, 897 (9th Cir. 2013) (“The *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine forbids a losing party in state court from filing suit in federal district court complaining of an injury caused by a state court judgment, and seeking federal court review and rejection of that judgment.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Polk’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 56) is granted.

Polk’s motion requesting oral argument (Docket Entry No. 57) is denied.

Polk’s motion to strike the County’s answering brief (Docket Entry No. 63) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Presidential Documents

14755 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 50 

Tuesday, March 15, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of February 25, 2022 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) and Section 

614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the following 

authorities, subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 614(a)(3) and 

section 652 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), in order to provide 

immediate military assistance to Ukraine: 

(1) the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether 

it is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish 

up to $250 million in assistance without regard to any provision of law 

within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA; and 

(2) the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown 

of up to an aggregate value of $350 million in defense articles and services 

of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, and 

to make the determinations required under such section to direct such 

a drawdown. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, February 25, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–05615 

Filed 3–14–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC2BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,


c/o
      Global Commercial Real Estate


4
      World
      Financial Center, 16 th Floor


250
      Vesey
      Street, New York, New York 10080





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of December 1, 2006
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, Midland Loan
      Services, Inc. as Master Servicer No. 1, Wells Fargo Bank National Association,
      as Master Servicer No. 2, LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer, and LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to ML-CFC Commercial Mortgage
      Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
      2006-4.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### SCALF vs. TOMPKINS.

Appeal from Collin county.

*Beconvention*— Thejokljind the revised .statutes upon the sub ject do not conflict, and it was provided in the old, that the plea in re-convention was valid in^ oases where . the_ (ie.feiulant__has_a_ claim agai n st th e_]dai fit iff. similar in natu re (t hough _tlmy _ ne.ed._no t bq_of the same degree) tojjha^ujopn_whi_ch tkélstñfii'jS.uñiled.

*Same*— llecovery.-—-The right to recover in such suit does tuff depend upon the money character of the claim sued on.

*Sam.e*— Pleading—Under our system of jurisprudence, all matters touching the cause of action, which under that law may be pleaded in reconvention, may be alleged in an answer.

*Same.*— -The plea in recimvention under *'7*Tex., 205, and 5 Tex., 506, is not confined to cases wherein, the original .suit was on a moneynd_demand, but may be interposed in any case where the matter pleaded comes within_flie_definitjou in art. 605, Rev, StaL. »

*~~~Sáme*— Pleading—Practice.-—Second objection to the plea in re-convention was well taken because after discovering the defect in the machinery, the defendant had the right to rescind within a reasonable time, or retain and sue for damages, or recoup them in a suit for purchase money. It appears that while he offered to rescind, at the request of plaintiff he retained the machinery and used it, plaintiff agreeing to pay any damage he might sustain by reason *63of failure of machinery to perform according to contract. Had this proposition been rejected, action for purchase money would have been sustained. That plaintiff claims exemplary damages is tantamount to prayer therefor^

Reversed and remanded.

Willie, C, J.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Stewart &
Stevenson LLC’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned officer certifies that to my
knowledge:




1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods presented in the Report.




Date:  May
1, 2009




By:/s/ROBERT
      L. HARGRAVERobert
      L. Hargrave
              Chief
      Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6400 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                 Resources System units in New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Seidler Beach Unit NJ-02, 
Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ-03P, Conaskonk Point Unit NJ-04'', dated August 
1, 2014, that is included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units in New Jersey, is hereby 
replaced by another map subtitled ``Seidler Beach Unit NJ-02/NJ-02P, 
Cliffwood Beach Unit NJ-03P, Conaskonk Point Unit NJ-04, Sayreville 
Unit NJ-15P, Matawan Point Unit NJ-16P'' and dated October 7, 2016.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                 Resources System units in New Jersey.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert R. Gerber, the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Robert R. Gerber
-------------------------------------------
Robert R. Gerber
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
#### DOMINANT INVESTMENTS 113, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1517

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 2017

Decided: December 22, 2017

C. Thomas Brown, SILVER & BROWN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Stacey A. Moffet, ECCLESTON *&*WOLF, P.C., Hanover, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Dominant Investments 113, LLC, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant United States Liability Insurance Company on Dominant’s claims for breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Cts. *&*Jud. Proc. § 3-1701 (West 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Dominant Invs. 113, LLC v. U.S. Liab. Ins. Co.,*247 F.Supp.3d 696 (D. Md. 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*