alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6413 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require oil polluters to 

pay the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2016 

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on the Budget, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require 

oil polluters to pay the full cost of oil spills, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Big Oil Bailout Pre5 vention Trust Fund Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6413 IH

1 SEC. 2. OIL SPILL LIABILITY TRUST FUND. 

2 (a) LIMITATIONS ON EXPENDITURES AND AUTHOR3 ITY TO BORROW.—Section 9509 of the Internal Revenue 

4 Code of 1986 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c)— 

6 (A) by striking paragraph (2), 

7 (B) by striking ‘‘EXPENDITURES’’ and all 

8 that follows through ‘‘Amounts in’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘EXPENDITURES.—Amounts in’’, and 

10 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

11 through (F) as paragraphs (1) through (6), re12 spectively, and moving such paragraphs (as so 

13 redesignated) 2 ems to the left, 

14 (2) in subsection (d)— 

15 (A) by striking paragraph (2), 

16 (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as 

17 paragraph (2), and 

18 (C) in paragraph (2) (as so redesig19 nated)— 

20 (i) by striking subparagraph (B), and 

21 (ii) by redesignating subparagraph 

22 (C) as subparagraph (B), and 

23 (3) in subsection (e)— 

24 (A) by striking ‘‘(or is unable by reason of 

25 subsection (c)(2))’’, and 

26 (B) by striking ‘‘and such subsection’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6413 IH

1 SEC. 3. ADVANCE PAYMENTS. 

2 Section 1012 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 

3 U.S.C. 2712) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(m) ADVANCE PAYMENTS.—The President shall 

6 promulgate regulations that allow advance payments to be 

7 made from the Fund to States and political subdivisions 

8 of States for actions taken to prepare for and mitigate 

9 substantial threats from the discharge of oil.’’. 

10 SEC. 4. BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

11 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

12 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

13 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

14 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

15 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

16 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

17 House of Representatives, provided that such statement 

18 has been submitted before the vote on passage. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32003R1043 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R1043

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2003 of 17 June 2003 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods **

*
Official Journal L 151 , 19/06/2003 P. 0028 - 0031 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2003

of 17 June 2003

establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council(2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 444/2002(4), and in particular Article 173(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Articles 173 to 177 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 provide that the Commission shall periodically establish unit values for the products referred to in the classification in Annex 26 to that Regulation.

(2) The result of applying the rules and criteria laid down in the abovementioned Articles to the elements communicated to the Commission in accordance with Article 173(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 is that unit values set out in the Annex to this Regulation should be established in regard to the products in question,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The unit values provided for in Article 173(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 June 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 June 2003.

For the Commission

Erkki Liikanen

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 17.

(3) OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 68, 12.3.2002, p. 11.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
#### GODADDY.COM, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, Rmail Limited, RPost International Limited, RPost Holdings Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants

2016-2335

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 5, 2017

Brian W. Lacorte, Ballard Spahr LLP, Phoenix, AZ, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Jonathon A. Talcott, Jessica A. Wilson.

Lewis Emery Hudnell, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, argued for defendants-appellants.

Maximilian A. Grant, Latham *&*Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Endurance International Group, Inc. Also represented by Gabriel Bell, Abigail A. Rives; Richard Gregory Frenk-el, Menlo Park, CA.

Casey L. Griffith, Griffith Bates Champion *&*Harper LLP, Dallas, TX, for ami-cus curiae Raymond A. Mercado, Ph.D

(Dyk, Bryson, and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan He and Xiuyong Zhang, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.



September 4, 2012



|/s/ Xiaoan He                             | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|Xiaoan He
        Chief Executive Officer | 



|/s/ Xiuyong Zhang                             | 
|--------------------------------------------- | 
|Xiuyong Zhang
        Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
### TEX A S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00163- CV Gary W . Gat e s, J r . , App e lla nt

v. Texas Depart ment of

Family and Protect ive Service s, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COU NTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRI CT NO. GN100925 , HONO RABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I NI O N Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismis s his appeal. We gr ant the motion and dismi ss the appea l. T ex. R. App. P . 42. 1(a) .

__________________________________________ D avid P ur year , Justice B efor e Justices B . A. S mith, P ur year and Wa ldr op D ismiss ed on Appe llant’s M otion F iled: M ay 11, 2006
----

**ANNUAL      STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

**Pooling      and Servicing Agreement dated November 13, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing      Agreement") by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II as      depositor, LaSalle Bank National Association as trustee, Wachovia Bank, National      Association as master servicer, and LNR Partners, Inc. as special servicer      (the      "Special Servicer")**

**LB-UBS      2006-C7**

| 1.   | I                have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under                the                Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end                of the                fiscal year 2006 (the “Reporting                Period”)                and the Special Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing                Agreement has been made under my supervision;                and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer                has                fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement                in all                material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
02/03/201 1 15:3 4 FftX 2024935142 FAA "> DMS 12)001/003 

OEPARTMENT OF 

irlMNSPORWION 

rOGKET OPERATIONS 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

ml FEB-3 F ' ....^^^ , 

WASHINGTON,DC HEARING DOCKET 

on.. jTpg . 3 p ^: , t ^pp^^g ^ p HEARINGS . . ^^^ ' ^ ZM 

IN THE MATTER 01-

FLIGHTSTAR AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. 

FAA Docket No. CP10GT0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-1076 

Tlie Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF IIEARINC; REQUEST 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that Klightsiar Aircraft Services, inc., Respondent herein, by 

and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R. Part 13), hereby 

withdraws its request for a hearing in thi.s matter. 

llic parties have agreed to a lull and final settlement of this matter. As a result, aheaiing 

on the merits is no longer necessary. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, Fiighistar Aircraft Services, Inc., respectfully requests that 

the above-captioned matter be terminated with prejudice. 
02/03/201 1 15:3 4 FAX 202493514 2 FAA •> DMS 0002/003 

Dated: January 26, 2011 

Respectfully sjjbmitfcd, 

JNTON, ESQ. 

Court 

Rockvidc, MD 20850 

Tel: (301) 294-8550 

Fax:(301)294-2525 

CTreg(a)AviaiionLawi:ixperts.com 

Counsel for Respondent 
02/03/201 1 15:3 4 FAX 2024935142 FAA •> DMS EI003/003 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

1 hereby certify that I have this date served by regular U.S. mail, po.stagc prepaid, an original and 

one (1) copy of the foregoing Notice of Withdrawal addressed to: 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

And, further, that I have this date sei-ved via facsimile and legular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, a 

copy oftho foregoing Notice of Withdrawal addressed to; 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative r.aw Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

(jleim L. Brown 

Senior Attorney 

Office t)f the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lalce.s Region. AGL-7 

2300 Devon Avenue 

Dcs Plaines, TL 60018 

Tel; 847-294-7063 

Fax: 847-294-7498 

Dated: January 26, 2011 

iY S. WINTON, ESQ. 

iation Law Firm 

Oflfc'Rcsearch Court 

Suite 450 

Rockville, MD 20850
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Patrick J. Goodman,  Senior  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer
of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period
     ended   September  30,  2003  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2003




                           /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
                -------------------------------------------------
                               Patrick J. Goodman
                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                            (chief financial officer)
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00843- CR Chr ist ophe rDa nie l G ue r r a, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY NO. 05-4 787- 3, HO NORAB LE DONALD HI GGINB OTH AM, JUDGE P RESIDING

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N On Dec ember 30, 2005, afte r notice of appea l w as filed, the trial co u rt grante d appellant Christopher D aniel Gue rra ’s motion for new trial. The a ppeal is dismissed.

________________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P atterson a nd Puryear Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: January

26, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
# EUR-Lex - 32003R0836 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003R0836

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 836/2003 of 15 May 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002 approving operations to check conformity to the marketing standards applicable to fresh fruit and vegetables carried out in South Africa prior to import into the European Community **

*
Official Journal L 121 , 16/05/2003 P. 0003 - 0004 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 836/2003

of 15 May 2003

amending Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002 approving operations to check conformity to the marketing standards applicable to fresh fruit and vegetables carried out in South Africa prior to import into the European Community

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003(2), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002(3) sets out in its Annex II a model of certificate referred to in Article 7(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1148/2001 of 12 June 2001 on checks on conformity to the marketing standards applicable to fruit and vegetables(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2003(5).

(2) The South African authorities have informed the Commission that the certificate used has been amended.

(3) Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4) In order to avoid practical and commercial difficulties it should be possible to use the existing model certificate until 30 June 2003.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply as from 1 June 2003. However, certificates according to the model in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2103/2002 in its version of the 28 November 2002, can also be used until 30 June 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2003.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64.

(3) OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 11.

(4) OJ L 156, 13.6.2001, p. 9.

(5) OJ L 62, 6.3.2003, p. 8.

ANNEX

'ANNEX II

MODEL CERTIFICATE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 7(3) OF REGULATION (EC) No 1148/2001

>PIC FILE= "L_2003121EN.000403.TIF">
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James BRANCH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4766

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Eric J. Brignac, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*832PER CURIAM:

James Branch appeals the 60-month sentence imposed by the district court after his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2012). Branch's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), concluding there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning whether Branch’s sentence is substantively reasonable. Although notified of his right to file a pro se brief, Branch has not done so. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal as barred by the appeal waiver in Branch’s plea agreement. We dismiss the appeal.

We review de novo the validity of an appeal waiver. *United States v. Copeland,*707 F.3d 522, 528 (4th Cir. 2013). A defendant’s waiver is valid if he agreed to it “knowingly and intelligently.” *United States v. Manigan,*592 F.3d 621, 627 (4th Cir. 2010). An appeal waiver generally is enforceable “if the record establishes that the waiver is valid and that the issue being appealed is within the scope of the waiver.” *United States v. Thornsbury,*670 F.3d 532, 537 (4th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Branch knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that the sentencing issue Branch seeks to raise on appeal falls squarely within the scope of his waiver of appellate rights. Moreover, in accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record for any potentially meritorious issues that might fall outside the scope of the waiver and have found none. *See Copeland,*707 F.3d at 529-30. Accordingly, we grant the Government’s motion. to dismiss the appeal.

This court requires that counsel inform Branch, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Branch requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such' a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was.served on Branch. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 4.3



                                                                     Exhibit 4.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Tele Centro Oeste Celular Participacoes S.A.
SCN Q.02 Bloco C, 226 - 6 andar
Brasilia- DF

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of our report dated
January 31, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tele
Centro Oeste Celular Participacoes S.A., prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in Brazil for the year ended December 31, 2001,
which appears in such Annual Report.

                 Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S.C.

                             /s/ Luiz Carlos Nannini
                                     Partner


Brasilia, Brazil

June 24, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Theodore A. Boutacoff, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, certify that the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2010 (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IRIDEX Corporation.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFF            
|Name:                  |  | Theodore A. Boutacoff                
|Title:                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)