Calendar No. 109

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 13

[Report No. 104–82]

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Setting forth the congressional budget for the

1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.United States Government for the fiscal years

MAY 15, 1995

Placed on the calendar
III

Calendar No. 109

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 13

[Report No. 104–82]

Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government

for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 15, 1995

Mr. DOMENICI, from the Committee on the Budget, reported the following

original concurrent resolution; which was placed on the calendar

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States

Government for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,

2000, 2001, and 2002.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET

4 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996.

5 (a) DECLARATION.—The Congress determines and

6 declares that this resolution is the concurrent resolution

7 on the budget for fiscal year 1996, including the appro-
2

•SCON 13 PCS

1 priate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999,

2 2000, 2001, and 2002, as required by section 301 of the

3 Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

4 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for

5 this concurrent resolution is as follows:

Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1996.

TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

Sec. 2. Recommended levels and amounts.

Sec. 3. Debt increase.

Sec. 4. Social Security.

Sec. 5. Major functional categories.

Sec. 6. Reconciliation.

TITLE II—BUDGETARY RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

Sec. 201. Discretionary spending limits.

Sec. 202. Extension of pay-as-you-go point of order.

Sec. 203. Tax reserve fund in the Senate.

Sec. 204. Budget surplus allowance.

Sec. 205. Scoring of emergency legislation.

Sec. 206. Sale of Government assets.

Sec. 207. Credit reform and guaranteed student loans.

Sec. 208. Extension of Budget Act 60-vote enforcement through 2002.

Sec. 209. Repeal of IRS allowance.

Sec. 210. Exercise of rulemaking powers.

TITLE III—SENSE OF THE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE

Sec. 301. Restructuring Government and program terminations.

Sec. 302. Sense of the Senate regarding returning programs to the States.

Sec. 303. Commercialization of Federal activities.

Sec. 304. Nonpartisan Advisory Commission on the CPI.

Sec. 305. Sense of the Congress on a uniform accounting system in the Federal

Government.

Sec. 306. Sense of the Congress that 90 percent of the benefits of any tax cuts

must go to the middle class.

Sec. 307. Bipartisan Commission on the Solvency of Medicare.

Sec. 308. Sense of the Senate on the distribution of agriculture savings.

Sec. 309. Sense of the Congress regarding protection of children’s health.

Sec. 310. Sense of the Senate that lobbying expenses should remain nondeductible.

Sec. 311. Expatriate taxes.
3

•SCON 13 PCS

1 TITLE I—LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

2 SEC. 2. RECOMMENDED LEVELS AND AMOUNTS.

3 The following budgetary levels are appropriate for the

4 fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and

5 2002:

6 (1) FEDERAL REVENUES.—(A) For purposes of the

7 enforcement of this resolution—

8 (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues

9 are as follows:

10 Fiscal year 1996: $1,042,400,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 1997: $1,082,800,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 1998: $1,134,200,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1999: $1,188,400,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2000: $1,247,400,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2001: $1,314,200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2002: $1,385,000,000,000.

17 (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels

18 of Federal revenues should be changed are as fol19 lows:

20 Fiscal year 1996: ¥$600,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 1997: ¥$700,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 1998: ¥$800,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 1999: $900,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2000: $1,200,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2001: $0.
4

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 2002: $0.

2 (iii) The amounts for Federal Insurance Con3 tributions Act revenues for hospital insurance within

4 the recommended levels of Federal revenues are as

5 follows:

6 Fiscal year 1996: $103,800,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1997: $109,000,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 1998: $114,900,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 1999: $120,700,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2000: $126,900,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 2001: $133,600,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 2002: $140,400,000,000.

13 (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu14 rity Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the

15 Hospital Insurance Trust Fund)—

16 (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues

17 are as follows:

18 Fiscal year 1996: $938,600,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1997: $937,800,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 1998: $1,019,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 1999: $1,067,700,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2000: $1,120,500,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2001: $1,180,600,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2002: $1,244,600,000,000.
5

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels

2 of Federal revenues should be changed are as fol3 lows:

4 Fiscal year 1996: ¥$595,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1997: ¥$701,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 1998: ¥$793,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1999: $902,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2000: $1,201,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2001: $11,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2002: ¥$6,000,000.

11 (2) NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY.—(A) For purposes of

12 comparison with the maximum deficit amount under sec13 tions 601(a)(1) and 606 of the Congressional Budget Act

14 of 1974 and for purposes of the enforcement of this reso15 lution, the appropriate levels of total new budget authority

16 are as follows:

17 Fiscal year 1996: $1,268,500,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1997: $1,295,300,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1998: $1,343,400,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 1999: $1,385,900,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2000: $1,444,800,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2001: $1,472,000,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2002: $1,518,100,000,000.

24 (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu25 rity Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the
6

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Hospital Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of

2 total new budget authority are as follows:

3 Fiscal year 1996: $1,171,200,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 1997: $1,194,800,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1998: $1,237,000,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 1999: $1,272,500,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2000: $1,324,400,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2001: $1,324,400,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002: $1,377,900,000,000.

10 (3) BUDGET OUTLAYS.—(A) For purposes of com11 parison with the maximum deficit amount under sections

12 601(a)(1) and 606 of the Congressional Budget Act of

13 1974 and for purposes of the enforcement of this resolu14 tion, the appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as

15 follows:

16 Fiscal year 1996: $1,274,800,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1997: $1,292,700,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1998: $1,320,000,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1999: $1,367,100,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2000: $1,422,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2001: $1,451,000,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002: $1,498,500,000,000.

23 (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu24 rity Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the
7

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Hospital Insurance Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of

2 total budget outlays are as follows:

3 Fiscal year 1996: $1,179,200,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 1997: $1,193,200,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1998: $1,214,600,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 1999: $1,255,500,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2000: $1,302,900,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2001: $1,322,500,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002: $1,359,500,000,000.

10 (4) DEFICITS.—(A) For purposes of comparison with

11 the maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and

12 606 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for pur13 poses of the enforcement of this resolution, the amounts

14 of the deficits are as follows:

15 Fiscal year 1996: $232,400,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 1997: $209,900,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1998: $185,800,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1999: $178,700,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2000: $174,900,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2001: $136,800,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2002: $113,500,000,000.

22 (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu23 rity Act (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the

24 Hospital Insurance Trust Fund), the amounts of the defi25 cits are as follows:
8

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 1996: $240,600,000,000.

2 Fiscal year 1997: $219,400,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 1998: $195,300,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 1999: $187,800,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2000: $182,400,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 2001: $141,900,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2002: $114,900,000,000.

8 (5) PUBLIC DEBT.—The appropriate levels of the

9 public debt are as follows:

10 Fiscal year 1996: $5,201,700,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 1997: $5,481,000,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 1998: $5,734,900,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1999: $5,980,000,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2000: $6,219,000,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2001: $6,421,800,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2002: $6,599,500,000,000.

17 (6) DIRECT LOAN OBLIGATIONS.—The appropriate

18 levels of total new direct loan obligations are as follows:

19 Fiscal year 1996: $37,600,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 1997: $40,200,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 1998: $42,300,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 1999: $45,700,000,000.

23 Fiscal year 2000: $45,800,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2001: $45,800,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2002: $46,100,000,000.
9

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (7) PRIMARY LOAN GUARANTEE COMMITMENTS.—

2 The appropriate levels of new primary loan guarantee

3 commitments are as follows:

4 Fiscal year 1996: $193,400,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1997: $187,900,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 1998: $185,300,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1999: $183,300,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2000: $184,700,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2001: $186,100,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2002: $187,600,000,000.

11 SEC. 3. DEBT INCREASE.

12 The amounts of the increase in the public debt sub13 ject to limitation are as follows:

14 Fiscal year 1996: $298,700,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 1997: $279,300,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 1998: $253,900,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1999: $245,100,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 2000: $239,000,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2001: $202,800,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2002: $177,700,000,000.

21 SEC. 4. SOCIAL SECURITY.

22 (a) SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUES.—For purposes of

23 Senate enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the

24 Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of reve25 nues of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance
10

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust

2 Fund are as follows:

3 Fiscal year 1996: $347,700,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 1997: $392,000,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1998: $411,400,000,000.

6 Fiscal year 1999: $430,900,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2000: $452,000,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2001: $475,200,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 2002: $498,600,000,000.

10 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY OUTLAYS.—For purposes of

11 Senate enforcement under sections 302 and 311 of the

12 Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the amounts of outlays

13 of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust

14 Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund

15 are as follows:

16 Fiscal year 1996: $299,400,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 1997: $310,900,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1998: $324,600,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1999: $338,500,000,000.

20 Fiscal year 2000: $353,100,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2001: $368,100,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002: $383,800,000,000.

23 SEC. 5. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

24 The Congress determines and declares that the ap25 propriate levels of new budget authority, budget outlays,
11

•SCON 13 PCS

1 new direct loan obligations, and new primary loan guaran2 tee commitments for fiscal years 1996 through 2000 for

3 each major functional category are:

4 (1) National Defense (050):

5 Fiscal year 1996:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $257,700,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $261,100,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $1,700,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 1997:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $253,400,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $257,000,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $1,700,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 1998:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $259,600,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $254,500,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $1,700,000,000.
12

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 1999:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $266,200,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $259,600,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $1,700,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2000:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $276,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $267,800,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $1,700,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2001:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $275,900,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $267,700,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $1,700,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 2002:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $275,900,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $269,200,000,000.
13

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $1,700,000,000.

4 (2) International Affairs (150):

5 Fiscal year 1996:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $15,400,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $16,900,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $5,700,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $18,300,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1997:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $14,300,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $15,100,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $5,700,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $18,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 1998:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $13,500,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $14,300,000,000.
14

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $5,700,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $18,300,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1999:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $12,600,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $5,700,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $18,300,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2000:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $14,100,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $13,100,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $5,700,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $18,300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $14,300,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.
15

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $5,700,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $18,300,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2002:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $14,200,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $13,300,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $5,700,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $18,300,000,000.

13 (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):

14 Fiscal year 1996:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $16,700,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $16,700,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 1997:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $16,300,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
16

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 1998:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $16,100,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $16,300,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 1999:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $16,000,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $16,000,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 2000:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $15,800,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2001:
17

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $15,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2002:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $15,800,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 (4) Energy (270):

15 Fiscal year 1996:

16 (A) New budget authority, $2,900,000,000

17 (B) Outlays, $2,700,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations,

19 $1,200,000,000.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1997:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $1,700,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $1,000,000,000.
18

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,200,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1998:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $3,300,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $2,600,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $1,200,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 1999:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $4,200,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $3,100,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $1,200,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $4,100,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $2,800,000,000.
19

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,200,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 2001:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $4,000,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $1,200,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 2002:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $4,000,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $2,900,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $1,200,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $19,500,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $20,400,000,000.
20

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $100,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1997:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $18,300,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $20,100,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $100,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 1998:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $15,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $17,900,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $100,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 1999:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $16,800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $18,400,000,000.
21

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $100,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 2000:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $16,400,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $17,400,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $100,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 2001:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $15,000,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $15,900,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $100,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2002:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $15,800,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $16,600,000,000.
22

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $100,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 (6) Agriculture (350):

6 Fiscal year 1996:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $13,100,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations,

11 $11,500,000,000.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $5,700,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 1997:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $12,200,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $10,900,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations,

19 $11,500,000,000.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $5,700,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 1998:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $11,800,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.
23

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $10,900,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $5,700,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1999:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $11,700,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $10,400,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $11,600,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $5,700,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2000:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $11,700,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $10,600,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $11,400,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $5,700,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2001:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $10,500,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
24

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $11,100,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $5,700,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2002:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $10,100,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $9,100,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $10,900,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $5,700,000,000.

13 (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):

14 Fiscal year 1996:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $2,500,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations,

19 $1,400,000,000.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $123,100,000,000.

22 Fiscal year 1997:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $1,500,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, ¥$5,400,000,000.
25

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,400,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $123,100,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1998:

6 (A) New budget authority, $600,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, ¥$7,000,000,000

8 (C) New direct loan obligations,

9 $1,400,000,000.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $123,100,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 1999:

13 (A) New budget authority, $100,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, ¥$5,100,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations,

16 $1,400,000,000.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $123,100,000,000.

19 Fiscal year 2000:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $1,700,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, ¥$2,500,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations,

24 $1,400,000,000.
26

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $123,100,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority, $500,000,000.

5 (B) Outlays, ¥$3,300,000,000.

6 (C) New direct loan obligations,

7 $1,400,000,000.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $123,100,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2002:

11 (A) New budget authority, $200,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, ¥$3,400,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations,

14 $1,400,000,000.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $123,100,000,000.

17 (8) Transportation (400):

18 Fiscal year 1996:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $36,500,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $38,300,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations,

23 $200,000,000.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
27

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 1997:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $38,800,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $32,800,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations,

6 $200,000,000.

7 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit8 ments, $0.

9 Fiscal year 1998:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $39,400,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $31,800,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations,

14 $200,000,000.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 1999:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $40,200,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $31,300,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations,

22 $200,000,000.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2000:
28

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $41,200,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $200,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 Fiscal year 2001:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $41,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations,

13 $200,000,000.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 Fiscal year 2002:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $40,800,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $31,100,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations,

21 $200,000,000.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 (9) Community and Regional Development (450):

25 Fiscal year 1996:
29

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $5,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $9,800,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $2,700,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $1,200,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 1997:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $5,400,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $7,300,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations,

13 $2,700,000,000.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $1,200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 1998:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $5,100,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $5,600,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations,

21 $2,700,000,000.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $1,200,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 1999:
30

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $5,100,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $2,700,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $1,200,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2000:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $5,000,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $5,100,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations,

13 $2,700,000,000.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $1,200,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2001:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $4,500,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations,

21 $2,700,000,000.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $1,200,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 2002:
31

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $4,400,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $2,700,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $1,200,000,000.

8 (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social

9 Services (500):

10 Fiscal year 1996:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $48,100,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $51,700,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations,

15 $13,600,000,000.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $16,300,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1997:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $47,300,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $47,900,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations,

23 $16,300,000,000.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $15,900,000,000.
32

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 1998:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $47,200,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $47,000,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations,

6 $19,100,000,000.

7 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit8 ments, $15,200,000,000.

9 Fiscal year 1999:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $47,400,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations,

14 $21,800,000,000.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $14,300,000,000.

17 Fiscal year 2000:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $47,800,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $47,300,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations,

22 $21,900,000,000.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $15,000,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2001:
33

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $47,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $46,800,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations,

5 $22,000,000,000.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $15,800,000,000.

8 Fiscal year 2002:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $47,400,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $46,900,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations,

13 $22,200,000,000.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $16,600,000,000.

16 (11) Health (550):

17 Fiscal year 1996:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $120,100,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $120,600,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $300,000,000.

24 Fiscal year 1997:
34

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $126,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $126,500,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $300,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 1998:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $132,100,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $132,200,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $300,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 1999:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $137,000,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $136,900,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $300,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $141,100,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $140,900,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
35

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $300,000,000.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $145,200,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $145,000,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $300,000,000.

10 Fiscal year 2002:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $149,600,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $149,300,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $300,000,000.

17 (12) Medicare (570):

18 Fiscal year 1996:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $171,900,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $169,500,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1997:
36

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $180,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $178,900,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 1998:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $193,100,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $191,400,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 1999:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $207,400,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $204,800,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $221,400,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $219,500,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
37

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $238,900,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $236,900,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2002:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $258,900,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $256,700,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 (13) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu18 rity Act, Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust

19 Fund:

20 Fiscal year 1996:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $61,200,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $60,500,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
38

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 1997:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $66,500,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $65,900,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 1998:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $73,700,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $73,000,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 1999:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $81,900,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $81,100,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2000:
39

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $90,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $89,400,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2001:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $100,400,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $99,500,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 2002:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $112,300,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $111,300,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (14) Income Security (600):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $226,300,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $225,900,000,000.
40

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $1,000,000,000.

4 Fiscal year 1997:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $233,700,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $235,600,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $1,000,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 1998:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 $253,000,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, $246,100,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $1,000,000,000.

18 Fiscal year 1999:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $256,000,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $257,900,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $1,000,000,000.

25 Fiscal year 2000:
41

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $272,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $272,600,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $1,000,000,000.

7 Fiscal year 2001:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $277,500,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $277,400,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $1,000,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2002:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $291,900,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $291,700,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $1,000,000,000.

21 (15) Social Security (650):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $5,900,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $8,500,000,000.
42

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 Fiscal year 1997:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $8,100,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $10,500,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 Fiscal year 1998:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 $8,800,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, $11,300,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 1999:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $9,600,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $12,100,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2000:
43

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $10,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $12,900,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 2001:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 $11,100,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 2002:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 $11,700,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, $14,100,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 (16) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):

22 Fiscal year 1996:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $37,400,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $36,900,000,000.
44

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,200,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $26,700,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 1997:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $37,500,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $37,700,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $1,100,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $21,600,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1998:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $37,600,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $38,000,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $1,000,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $19,700,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 1999:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $37,900,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $38,200,000,000.
45

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,000,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $18,600,000,000.

5 Fiscal year 2000:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $37,900,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $39,400,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations,

10 $1,200,000,000.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $19,300,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 2001:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $38,300,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $40,100,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations,

18 $1,400,000,000.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $19,900,000,000.

21 Fiscal year 2002:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 $38,700,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.
46

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations,

2 $1,700,000,000.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $20,600,000,000.

5 (17) Administration of Justice (750):

6 Fiscal year 1996:

7 (A) New budget authority,

8 $20,000,000,000.

9 (B) Outlays, $19,600,000,000.

10 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

11 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit12 ments, $0.

13 Fiscal year 1997:

14 (A) New budget authority,

15 $20,700,000,000.

16 (B) Outlays, $21,200,000,000.

17 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

18 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit19 ments, $0.

20 Fiscal year 1998:

21 (A) New budget authority,

22 $21,400,000,000.

23 (B) Outlays, $22,400,000,000.

24 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
47

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 1999:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 $22,300,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, $23,100,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2000:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 $22,300,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, $23,700,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 Fiscal year 2001:

18 (A) New budget authority,

19 $21,900,000,000.

20 (B) Outlays, $23,300,000,000.

21 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

22 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit23 ments, $0.

24 Fiscal year 2002:
48

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $21,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $23,200,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (18) General Government (800):

8 Fiscal year 1996:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $12,500,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1997:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $12,400,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1998:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $12,200,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
49

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 Fiscal year 1999:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $12,100,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $12,000,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 Fiscal year 2000:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 $12,000,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, $11,900,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $11,600,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $11,700,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
50

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $11,600,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $11,600,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (19) Net Interest (900):

8 Fiscal year 1996:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 $297,900,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, $297,900,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1997:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 $308,900,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, $308,900,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 1998:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 $316,600,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, $316,600,000,000.
51

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 Fiscal year 1999:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 $327,800,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, $327,800,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 Fiscal year 2000:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 $338,600,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, $338,600,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $0.

18 Fiscal year 2001:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 $345,500,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, $345,500,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 2002:
52

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 $353,300,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, $353,300,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 (20) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu8 rity Act, Net Interest (900):

9 Fiscal year 1996:

10 (A) New budget authority,

11 $308,800,000,000.

12 (B) Outlays, $308,800,000,000.

13 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

14 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit15 ments, $0.

16 Fiscal year 1997:

17 (A) New budget authority,

18 $319,800,000,000.

19 (B) Outlays, $319,800,000,000.

20 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

21 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit22 ments, $0.

23 Fiscal year 1998:

24 (A) New budget authority,

25 $326,900,000,000.
53

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (B) Outlays, $326,900,000,000.

2 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

3 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit4 ments, $0.

5 Fiscal year 1999:

6 (A) New budget authority,

7 $337,100,000,000.

8 (B) Outlays, $337,100,000,000.

9 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

10 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit11 ments, $0.

12 Fiscal year 2000:

13 (A) New budget authority,

14 $346,300,000,000.

15 (B) Outlays, $346,300,000,000.

16 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

17 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit18 ments, $0.

19 Fiscal year 2001:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 $351,200,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, $351,200,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
54

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 2002:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 $356,400,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, $356,400,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 (21) The corresponding levels of gross interest on the

9 public debt are as follows:

10 Fiscal year 1996: $369,598,000,000.

11 Fiscal year 1997: $380,164,000,000.

12 Fiscal year 1998: $388,144,000,000.

13 Fiscal year 1999: $400,182,000,000.

14 Fiscal year 2000: $411,444,000,000.

15 Fiscal year 2001: $421,668,000,000.

16 Fiscal year 2002: $430,760,000,000.

17 (22) Allowances (920):

18 Fiscal year 1996:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 ¥$8,600,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, ¥$6,500,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1997:
55

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$8,500,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$8,500,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 1998:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 ¥$7,300,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, ¥$7,600,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 1999:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 ¥$6,800,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, ¥$7,100,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 ¥$5,700,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, ¥$6,100,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
56

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 ¥$5,700,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, ¥$6,100,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2002:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 ¥$5,700,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, ¥$6,100,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 (23) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):

18 Fiscal year 1996:

19 (A) New budget authority,

20 ¥$33,100,000,000.

21 (B) Outlays, ¥$33,100,000,000.

22 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

23 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit24 ments, $0.

25 Fiscal year 1997:
57

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (A) New budget authority,

2 ¥$33,800,000,000.

3 (B) Outlays, ¥$33,800,000,000.

4 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

5 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit6 ments, $0.

7 Fiscal year 1998:

8 (A) New budget authority,

9 ¥$36,300,000,000.

10 (B) Outlays, ¥$36,300,000,000.

11 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

12 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit13 ments, $0.

14 Fiscal year 1999:

15 (A) New budget authority,

16 ¥$37,700,000,000.

17 (B) Outlays, ¥$37,700,000,000.

18 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

19 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit20 ments, $0.

21 Fiscal year 2000:

22 (A) New budget authority,

23 ¥$39,700,000,000.

24 (B) Outlays, ¥$39,700,000,000.

25 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
58

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit2 ments, $0.

3 Fiscal year 2001:

4 (A) New budget authority,

5 ¥$41,100,000,000.

6 (B) Outlays, ¥$41,100,000,000.

7 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

8 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit9 ments, $0.

10 Fiscal year 2002:

11 (A) New budget authority,

12 ¥$42,300,000,000.

13 (B) Outlays, ¥$42,300,000,000.

14 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

15 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit16 ments, $0.

17 (24) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Secu18 rity Act, Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):

19 Fiscal year 1996:

20 (A) New budget authority,

21 ¥$30,600,000,000.

22 (B) Outlays, ¥$30,600,000,000.

23 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

24 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit25 ments, $0.
59

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Fiscal year 1997:

2 (A) New budget authority,

3 ¥$31,200,000,000.

4 (B) Outlays, ¥$31,200,000,000.

5 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

6 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit7 ments, $0.

8 Fiscal year 1998:

9 (A) New budget authority,

10 ¥$33,600,000,000.

11 (B) Outlays, ¥$33,600,000,000.

12 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

13 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit14 ments, $0.

15 Fiscal year 1999:

16 (A) New budget authority,

17 ¥$34,900,000,000.

18 (B) Outlays, ¥$34,900,000,000.

19 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

20 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit21 ments, $0.

22 Fiscal year 2000:

23 (A) New budget authority,

24 ¥$36,700,000,000.

25 (B) Outlays, ¥$36,700,000,000.
60

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

2 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit3 ments, $0.

4 Fiscal year 2001:

5 (A) New budget authority,

6 ¥$37,900,000,000.

7 (B) Outlays, ¥$37,900,000,000.

8 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

9 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit10 ments, $0.

11 Fiscal year 2002:

12 (A) New budget authority,

13 ¥$39,000,000,000.

14 (B) Outlays, ¥$39,000,000,000.

15 (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.

16 (D) New primary loan guarantee commit17 ments, $0.

18 SEC. 6. RECONCILIATION.

19 (a) SENATE COMMITTEES.—Not later than July 14,

20 1995, the committees named in this subsection shall sub21 mit their recommendations to the Committee on the Budg22 et of the Senate. After receiving those recommendations,

23 the Committee on the Budget shall report to the Senate

24 a reconciliation bill carrying out all such recommendations

25 without any substantive revision.
61

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (1) COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION,

2 AND FORESTRY.—The Senate Committee on Agri3 culture, Nutrition, and Forestry shall report changes

4 in laws within its jurisdiction that provide direct

5 spending (as defined in section 250(c)(8) of the Bal6 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of

7 1985) to reduce outlays $2,490,000,000 in fiscal

8 year 1996, $27,973,000,000 for the period of fiscal

9 years 1996 through 2000, and $45,804,000,000 for

10 the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

11 (2) COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES.—The

12 Senate Committee on Armed Services shall report

13 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

14 direct spending to reduce outlays $21,000,000 in fis15 cal year 1996, $338,000,000 for the period of fiscal

16 years 1996 through 2000, and $649,000,000 for the

17 period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

18 (3) COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND

19 URBAN AFFAIRS.—The Senate Committee on Bank20 ing, Housing, and Urban Affairs shall report

21 changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the

22 deficit $373,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

23 $5,742,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

24 through 2000, and $6,690,000,000 for the period of

25 fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
62

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (4) COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND

2 TRANSPORTATION.—The Senate Committee on Com3 merce, Science, and Transportation shall report

4 changes in laws within its jurisdiction to reduce the

5 deficit $2,464,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

6 $21,937,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

7 through 2000, and $33,685,000,000 for the period

8 of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

9 (5) COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RE10 SOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Energy and

11 Natural Resources shall report changes in laws with12 in its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to re13 duce outlays $1,771,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

14 $4,775,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

15 through 2000, and $5,001,000,000 for the period of

16 fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

17 (6) COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC

18 WORKS.—The Senate Committee on Environment

19 and Public Works shall report changes in laws with20 in its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to re21 duce outlays $106,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

22 $1,290,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

23 through 2000, and $2,236,000,000 for the period of

24 fiscal years 1996 through 2002.
63

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (7) COMMITTEE ON FINANCE.—The Senate

2 Committee on Finance shall report changes in laws

3 within its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to

4 reduce outlays $21,657,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

5 $278,760,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

6 through 2000, and $519,002,000,000 for the period

7 of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

8 (8) COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS.—The

9 Senate Committee on Foreign Relations shall report

10 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide

11 direct spending to reduce outlays $0 in fiscal year

12 1996, $0 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through

13 2000, and $0 for the period of fiscal years 1996

14 through 2002.

15 (9) COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AF16 FAIRS.—The Senate Committee on Governmental

17 Affairs shall report changes in laws within its juris18 diction that provide direct spending to reduce out19 lays $118,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

20 $3,023,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

21 through 2000, and $6,871,000,000 for the period of

22 fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

23 (10) COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY.—The

24 Senate Committee on the Judiciary shall report

25 changes in laws within its jurisdiction that provide
64

•SCON 13 PCS

1 direct spending to reduce outlays $119,000,000 in

2 fiscal year 1996, $923,000,000 for the period of fis3 cal years 1996 through 2000, and $1,483,000,000

4 for the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

5 (11) COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN RE6 SOURCES.—The Senate Committee on Labor and

7 Human Resources shall report changes in laws with8 in its jurisdiction that provide direct spending to re9 duce outlays $1,141,000,000 in fiscal year 1996,

10 $9,165,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

11 through 2000, and $13,795,000,000 for the period

12 of fiscal years 1996 through 2002.

13 (12) COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRA14 TION.—The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

15 shall report changes in laws within its jurisdiction

16 that provide direct spending to reduce outlays

17 $2,000,000 in fiscal year 1996, $280,000,000 for

18 the period of fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and

19 $319,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

20 through 2002.

21 (13) COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS.—

22 The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs shall re23 port changes in laws within its jurisdiction that pro24 vide direct spending to reduce outlays $301,000,000

25 in fiscal year 1996, $5,760,000,000 for the period of
65

•SCON 13 PCS

1 fiscal years 1996 through 2000, and

2 $10,002,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 1996

3 through 2002.

4 TITLE II—BUDGETARY

5 RESTRAINTS AND RULEMAKING

6 SEC. 201. DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

7 (a) DEFINITION.—As used in this section and for the

8 purposes of allocations made pursuant to section 602(a)

9 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, for the discre10 tionary category, the term ‘‘discretionary spending limit’’

11 means—

12 (1) with respect to fiscal year 1996—

13 (A) for the defense category

14 $258,379,000,000 in new budget authority and

15 $262,035,000,000 in outlays; and

16 (B) for the nondefense category

17 $219,441,000,000 in new budget authority and

18 $264,908,000,000 in outlays;

19 (2) with respect to fiscal year 1997—

20 (A) for the defense category

21 $254,028,000,000 in new budget authority and

22 $257,695,000,000 in outlays; and

23 (B) for the nondefense category

24 $212,164,000,000 in new budget authority and

25 $249,248,000,000 in outlays;
66

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (3) with respect to fiscal year 1998—

2 (A) for the defense category

3 $260,321,000,000 in new budget authority and

4 $255,226,000,000 in outlays; and

5 (B) for the nondefense category

6 $219,247,000,000 in new budget authority and

7 $244,735,000,000 in outlays;

8 (4) with respect to fiscal year 1999—

9 (A) for the defense category

10 $266,906,000,000 in new budget authority and

11 $260,331,000,000 in outlays; and

12 (B) for the nondefense category

13 $210,579,000,000 in new budget authority and

14 $242,240,000,000 in outlays;

15 (5) with respect to fiscal year 2000—

16 (A) for the defense category

17 $276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and

18 $268,468,000,000 in outlays; and

19 (B) for the nondefense category

20 $215,533,000,000 in new budget authority and

21 $243,293,000,000 in outlays;

22 (6) with respect to fiscal year 2001—

23 (A) for the defense category

24 $276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and

25 $268,468,000,000 in outlays; and
67

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (B) for the nondefense category

2 $219,454,000,000 in new budget authority and

3 $248,790,000,000 in outlays; and

4 (7) with respect to fiscal year 2002—

5 (A) for the defense category

6 $276,644,000,000 in new budget authority and

7 $270,000,000,000 in outlays; and

8 (B) for the nondefense category

9 $218,854,000,000 in new budget authority and

10 $248,160,000,000 in outlays;

11 as adjusted for changes in concepts and definitions and

12 emergency appropriations.

13 (b) POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.—

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para15 graph (2), it shall not be in order in the Senate to

16 consider—

17 (A) any concurrent resolution on the budg18 et for fiscal year 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,

19 2000, 2001, or 2002 (or amendment, motion,

20 or conference report on such a resolution) that

21 provides discretionary spending in excess of the

22 sum of the defense and nondefense discre23 tionary spending limits for such fiscal year; or

24 (B) any appropriations bill or resolution

25 (or amendment, motion, or conference report on
68

•SCON 13 PCS

1 such appropriations bill or resolution) for fiscal

2 year 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,

3 2001, or 2002 that would exceed any of the dis4 cretionary spending limits in this section or

5 suballocations of those limits made pursuant to

6 section 602(b) of the Congressional Budget Act

7 of 1974.

8 (2) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply if

9 a declaration of war by the Congress is in effect or

10 if a joint resolution pursuant to section 258 of the

11 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control

12 Act of 1985 has been enacted.

13 (c) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or sus14 pended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three15 fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.

16 (d) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the deci17 sions of the Chair relating to any provision of this section

18 shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between,

19 and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the

20 concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the case

21 may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members

22 of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required

23 in the Senate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the

24 Chair on a point of order raised under this section.
69

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (e) DETERMINATION OF BUDGET LEVELS.—For pur2 poses of this section, the levels of new budget authority,

3 outlays, new entitlement authority, and revenues for a fis4 cal year shall be determined on the basis of estimates

5 made by the Committee on the Budget of the Senate.

6 SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO POINT OF ORDER.

7 (a) PURPOSE.—The Senate declares that it is essen8 tial to—

9 (1) ensure continued compliance with the bal10 anced budget plan set forth in this resolution; and

11 (2) continue the pay-as-you-go enforcement sys12 tem.

13 (b) POINT OF ORDER.—

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order in

15 the Senate to consider any direct-spending or re16 ceipts legislation (as defined in paragraph (3)) that

17 would increase the deficit for any one of the three

18 applicable time periods (as defined in paragraph (2))

19 as measured pursuant to paragraph (4).

20 (2) APPLICABLE TIME PERIODS.—For purposes

21 of this subsection, the term ‘‘applicable time period’’

22 means any one of the three following periods—

23 (A) the first fiscal year covered by the

24 most recently adopted concurrent resolution on

25 the budget;
70

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (B) the period of the first 5 fiscal years

2 covered by the most recently adopted concur3 rent resolution on the budget; or

4 (C) the period of the 5 fiscal years follow5 ing the first 5 years covered by the most re6 cently adopted concurrent resolution on the

7 budget.

8 (3) DIRECT-SPENDING OR RECEIPTS LEGISLA9 TION.—For purposes of this subsection, the term

10 ‘‘direct-spending or receipts legislation’’ shall—

11 (A) except as otherwise provided in this

12 subsection, include all direct-spending legisla13 tion as that term is interpreted for purposes of

14 the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

15 Control Act of 1985;

16 (B) include—

17 (i) any bill, joint resolution, amend18 ment, motion, or conference report to

19 which this subsection otherwise applies;

20 and

21 (ii) the estimated amount of savings

22 in direct-spending programs applicable to

23 that fiscal year resulting from the prior

24 year’s sequestration under the Balanced

25 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act
71

•SCON 13 PCS

1 of 1985, if any (except for any amounts

2 sequestered as a result of a net deficit in3 crease in the fiscal year immediately pre4 ceding the prior fiscal year); and

5 (C) exclude—

6 (i) any concurrent resolution on the

7 budget; and

8 (ii) full funding of, and continuation

9 of, the deposit insurance guarantee com10 mitment in effect on the date of enactment

11 of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990.

12 (4) BASELINE.—Estimates prepared pursuant

13 to this section shall—

14 (A) use the baseline used for the most re15 cent concurrent resolution on the budget, and

16 for years beyond those covered by that concur17 rent resolution; and

18 (B) abide by the requirements of sub19 sections (a) through (d) of section 257 of the

20 Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Con21 trol Act of 1985, except that references to ‘‘out22 years’’ in that section shall be deemed to apply

23 to any year (other than the budget year) cov24 ered by any one of the time periods defined in

25 paragraph (2) of this subsection.
72

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (c) WAIVER.—This section may be waived or sus2 pended in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three3 fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.

4 (d) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from the deci5 sions of the Chair relating to any provision of this section

6 shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between,

7 and controlled by, the appellant and the manager of the

8 bill or joint resolution, as the case may be. An affirmative

9 vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly

10 chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sus11 tain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of

12 order raised under this section.

13 (e) DETERMINATION OF BUDGET LEVELS.—For pur14 poses of this section, the levels of new budget authority,

15 outlays, and receipts for a fiscal year shall be determined

16 on the basis of estimates made by the Committee on the

17 Budget of the Senate.

18 (f) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 23 of

19 House Concurrent Resolution 218 (103d Congress) is re20 pealed.

21 (g) SUNSET.—Subsections (a) through (e) of this sec22 tion shall expire September 30, 2002.

23 SEC. 203. TAX RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE.

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—After passage of a conference re25 port on legislation complying with the reconciliation re-
73

•SCON 13 PCS

1 quirements of section 6, revenue and spending aggregates

2 may be reduced and allocations may be revised for legisla3 tion that reduces revenues within a committee’s jurisdic4 tion if such a committee or the committee of conference

5 on such legislation reports such legislation, if, to the ex6 tent that the costs of such legislation are not included in

7 this concurrent resolution on the budget, the enactment

8 of such legislation will not increase the deficit in this reso9 lution for—

10 (1) fiscal year 1996;

11 (2) the period of fiscal years 1996 through

12 2000; or

13 (3) the period of fiscal years 2001 through

14 2005.

15 (b) REVISED ALLOCATIONS.—Upon the reporting of

16 legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon the

17 submission of a conference report on such legislation (if

18 a conference report is submitted), the Chairman of the

19 Committee on the Budget of the Senate may file with the

20 Senate appropriately revised allocations under sections

21 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of

22 1974 and revised functional levels and aggregates to carry

23 out this subsection. These revised allocations, functional

24 levels, and aggregates shall be considered for the purposes

25 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as allocations,
74

•SCON 13 PCS

1 functional levels, and aggregates contained in this concur2 rent resolution on the budget.

3 (c) REPORTING REVISED ALLOCATIONS.—The ap4 propriate committee shall report appropriately revised al5 locations pursuant to sections 302(b) and 602(b) of the

6 Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to carry out this sec7 tion.

8 SEC. 204. BUDGET SURPLUS ALLOWANCE.

9 (a) ADJUSTMENTS.—For the purposes of points of

10 order under the Congressional Budget and Impoundment

11 Control Act of 1974 and this concurrent resolution on the

12 budget, the revenue aggregates may be reduced and other

13 appropriate budgetary aggregates and levels may be re14 vised to reflect the additional deficit reduction achieved

15 as calculated under subsection (c) for legislation that re16 duces revenues.

17 (b) REVISED AGGREGATES.—Upon the reporting of

18 legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon the

19 submission of a conference report on such legislation (if

20 a conference report is submitted), the Chairman of the

21 Committee on Budget of the Senate may submit to the

22 Senate appropriately revised budgetary aggregates and

23 levels by an amount that does not exceed the additional

24 deficit reduction calculated under subsection (d).
75

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (c) CBO REVISED DEFICIT ESTIMATE.—After the

2 enactment of legislation that complies with the reconcili3 ation directives of section 6, the Congressional Budget Of4 fice shall provide the Chairman of the Committee on the

5 Budget of the Senate a revised estimate of the deficit for

6 fiscal years 1996 through 2005.

7 (d) ADDITIONAL DEFICIT REDUCTION.—For pur8 poses of this section, the term ‘‘additional deficit reduc9 tion’’ means the amount by which the total deficit levels

10 assumed in this resolution for a fiscal year exceed the re11 vised deficit estimate provided pursuant to subsection (c)

12 for such fiscal year for fiscal years 1996 through 2005.

13 (e) CBO CERTIFICATION AND CONTINGENCIES.—

14 This section shall not apply unless—

15 (1) legislation has been enacted complying with

16 the reconciliation directives of section 6;

17 (2) the Director of the Congressional Budget

18 Office has provided the estimate required by sub19 section (c); and

20 (3) the revisions made pursuant to this sub21 section do not cause a budget deficit for fiscal year

22 2002, 2003, 2004, or 2005.

23 SEC. 205. SCORING OF EMERGENCY LEGISLATION.

24 Notwithstanding section 606(d)(2) of the Congres25 sional Budget Act of 1974 and beginning with fiscal year
76

•SCON 13 PCS

1 1996, the determinations under sections 302, 303, and

2 311 of such Act shall take into account any new budget

3 authority, new entitlement authority, outlays, receipts, or

4 deficit effects as a consequence of the provisions of section

5 251(b)(2)(D) and 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and

6 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

7 SEC. 206. SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS.

8 (a) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the

9 Congress that—

10 (1) the prohibition on scoring asset sales has

11 discouraged the sale of assets that can be better

12 managed by the private sector and generate receipts

13 to reduce the Federal budget deficit;

14 (2) the President’s fiscal year 1996 budget in15 cluded $8,000,000,000 in receipts from asset sales

16 and proposed a change in the asset sale scoring rule

17 to allow the proceeds from these sales to be scored;

18 (3) assets should not be sold if such sale would

19 increase the budget deficit over the long run; and

20 (4) the asset sale scoring prohibition should be

21 repealed and consideration should be given to replac22 ing it with a methodology that takes into account

23 the long-term budgetary impact of asset sales.

24 (b) BUDGETARY TREATMENT.—For purposes of any

25 concurrent resolution on the budget and the Congressional
77

•SCON 13 PCS

1 Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, the

2 amounts realized from sales of assets shall be scored with

3 respect to the level of budget authority, outlays, or reve4 nues.

5 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the

6 term ‘‘sale of an asset’’ shall have the same meaning as

7 under section 250(c)(21) of the Balanced Budget and

8 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

9 (d) TREATMENT OF LOAN ASSETS.—For the pur10 poses of this section, the sale of loan assets or the prepay11 ment of a loan shall be governed by the terms of the Fed12 eral Credit Reform Act of 1990.

13 SEC. 207. CREDIT REFORM AND GUARANTEED STUDENT

14 LOANS.

15 For the purposes of allocations and points of order

16 under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and this res17 olution, the cost of a direct loan shall be the net present

18 value, at the time when the direct loan is disbursed, of

19 the following cash flows for the estimated life of the loan:

20 (1) Loan disbursements.

21 (2) Repayments of principal.

22 (3) Payments of interest and other payments by

23 or to the Government over the life of the loan after

24 adjusting for estimated defaults, prepayments, fees,

25 penalties, and other recoveries.
78

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (4) In the case of legislation increasing direct

2 loan commitments for a program in which loan com3 mitments will equal or exceed $5,000,000,000 for

4 the coming fiscal year (or for any prior fiscal year),

5 direct expenses, including—

6 (A) activities related to credit extension,

7 loan origination, loan servicing, training, pro8 gram promotion, management of contractors,

9 and payments to contractors, other government

10 entities, and program participants;

11 (B) collection of delinquent loans; and

12 (C) writeoff and closeout of loans.

13 SEC. 208. EXTENSION OF BUDGET ACT 60-VOTE ENFORCE14 MENT THROUGH 2002.

15 Notwithstanding section 275(b) of the Balanced

16 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (as

17 amended by sections 13112(b) and 13208(b)(3) of the

18 Budget Enforcement Act of 1990), the second sentence

19 of section 904(c) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

20 (except insofar as it relates to section 313 of that Act)

21 and the final sentence of section 904(d) of that Act (ex22 cept insofar as it relates to section 313 of that Act) shall

23 continue to have effect as rules of the Senate through (but

24 no later than) September 30, 2002.
79

•SCON 13 PCS

1 SEC. 209. REPEAL OF IRS ALLOWANCE.

2 Section 25 of House Concurrent Resolution 218

3 (103d Congress, 2d Session) is repealed.

4 SEC. 210. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.

5 The Senate adopts the provisions of this title—

6 (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of

7 the Senate, and as such they shall be considered as

8 part of the rules of the Senate, and such rules shall

9 supersede other rules only to the extent that they

10 are inconsistent therewith; and

11 (2) with full recognition of the constitutional

12 right of the Senate to change those rules (so far as

13 they relate to the Senate) at any time, in the same

14 manner, and to the same extent as in the case of

15 any other rule of the Senate.

16 TITLE III—SENSE OF THE

17 CONGRESS AND THE SENATE

18 SEC. 301. RESTRUCTURING GOVERNMENT AND PROGRAM

19 TERMINATIONS.

20 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that to balance the

21 Federal budget in a rational and reasonable manner re22 quires an assessment of national priorities and the appro23 priate role of the Federal Government in meeting the chal24 lenges facing the United States in the 21st century.

25 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

26 Senate that to balance the budget the Congress should—
80

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (1) restructure Federal programs to meet iden2 tified national priorities in the most effective and ef3 ficient manner so that program dollars get to the in4 tended purpose or recipient;

5 (2) terminate programs that have largely met

6 their goals, that have outlived their original purpose,

7 or that have been superseded by other programs;

8 (3) seek to end significant duplication among

9 Federal programs, which results in excessive admin10 istrative costs and ill serve the American people; and

11 (4) eliminate lower priority programs.

12 SEC. 302. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING RETURNING

13 PROGRAMS TO THE STATES.

14 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that—

15 (1) section 8 of article I of the Constitution

16 grants the Federal Government limited powers and

17 the 10th amendment to the Constitution expressly

18 provides that the powers not delegated to the Fed19 eral Government are reserved to the States and the

20 people;

21 (2) in fiscal year 1993, the Federal Government

22 provided funds to States and localities through 593

23 categorical programs totaling $206,000,000,000;

24 (3) in attempting to solve every problem of soci25 ety, the Federal Government is overburdening the
81

•SCON 13 PCS

1 States and its citizens with cumbersome and intru2 sive laws, programs, regulations, and mandates; and

3 (4) in administering many Federal programs,

4 the States are often better equipped to determine

5 and respond to the particular needs of the people

6 than the Federal Government.

7 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

8 Senate that—

9 (1) Federal programs should be reviewed to de10 termine whether they are an appropriate function of

11 the Federal Government and whether they are more

12 appropriately a responsibility of the States consist13 ent with the 10th amendment to the Constitution;

14 (2) Federal resources should be provided in a

15 manner which rewards work, promotes families, and

16 provides a helping hand during times of crisis;

17 (3) the Federal Government should seek a new

18 partnership with States that recognizes that ‘‘one

19 size fits all’’ solutions of the past are flawed;

20 (4) this new partnership should include block

21 grants that provide maximum flexibility to States

22 and localities in terms of the design and structure

23 of programs to ensure the maximum benefit at the

24 least cost to the American taxpayer;
82

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (5) Federal funds must not be used to supplant

2 existing expenditures by individuals, localities, and

3 States;

4 (6) block grants should not be reduced to reve5 nue sharing;

6 (7) adequate safeguards should be in place to

7 protect the Federal investment, such as auditing or

8 maintenance of effort provisions; and

9 (8) the inclusion of Federal goals and principles

10 in block grant programs may be appropriate, as well

11 as essential data collection requirements for evalua12 tion purposes.

13 SEC. 303. COMMERCIALIZATION OF FEDERAL ACTIVITIES.

14 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that—

15 (1) there are a number of functions being per16 formed by the Federal Government that should not

17 be performed by the Federal Government because

18 they could be more conveniently and efficiently pro19 vided by the private sector;

20 (2) our Founding Fathers wrote a Constitution

21 that created a Federal Government of limited powers

22 and limited responsibility;

23 (3) the current Federal Government owns one24 third of the land of this great Nation, oil fields, hos25 pitals, railroads, Tokyo office buildings, electric com-
83

•SCON 13 PCS

1 panies, 4,900,000 housing units which are owned

2 outright by Housing and Urban Development or are

3 eligible for Housing and Urban Development subsidy

4 payments, and loan portfolios that are larger than

5 most of the financial institutions in the country; and

6 (4)(A) the Federal Government’s encroachment

7 into the private sector is significant, often duplica8 tive, inconsistent with free market principles, and

9 costly for taxpayers;

10 (B) when the Federal Government monopolizes

11 a service that could be provided by the private sec12 tor it usually costs taxpayers 30 percent more; and

13 (C) one-fourth of the work done by Federal em14 ployees competes with the private sector.

15 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

16 Senate that—

17 (1) Congress should better define privatization

18 and how it can contribute to ‘‘right sizing’’ the Fed19 eral Government and at the same time achieve better

20 service, more innovation, and significant deficit re21 duction;

22 (2) privatization can take at least four forms:

23 asset sales, contracting out, creating corporate en24 terprises under strict and clearly defined deadlines

25 designed to achieve full privatization, and eliminat-
84

•SCON 13 PCS

1 ing legislative barriers, generically called ‘‘private

2 sector lockouts’’;

3 (3) provisions of law that prohibit or ‘‘lockout’’

4 the private sector from competing for providing cer5 tain services should be examined and eliminated;

6 (4) the private sector from Main Street, Wall

7 Street and Academia should be encouraged by the

8 President and the Congress to bring forward their

9 privatization best practices and proposals for privat10 ization;

11 (5) the Head of each Federal agency and de12 partment and the Office of Management and Budget

13 should designate senior level staff persons to develop

14 and evaluate private sector privatization initiatives

15 that should be included in the President’s budget;

16 (6)(A) the Office of Management and Budget

17 should set appropriate privatization goals for each

18 agency; and

19 (B) no expansions of programs under a depart20 ment’s jurisdiction should be approved by the Office

21 of Management and Budget unless the agency has

22 achieved those privatization goals;

23 (7) section 257(e) of the Balanced Budget and

24 Emergency Deficit Control Act which prohibits cred-
85

•SCON 13 PCS

1 iting savings from asset sales should be repealed or

2 modified; and

3 (8) Congress should evaluate privatization proc4 esses taking place in other countries to determine

5 what lessons could be learned so that United States

6 could develop a comprehensive privatization policy by

7 the end of the next fiscal year.

8 SEC. 304. NONPARTISAN ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE

9 CPI.

10 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

11 (1) Congress intended to insulate certain gov12 ernment beneficiaries and taxpayers from the effects

13 of inflation by indexing payments and tax brackets

14 to the Consumer Price Index (CPI);

15 (2) approximately 30 percent of total Federal

16 outlays and 45 percent of Federal revenues are in17 dexed to reflect changes in the CPI; and

18 (3) the overwhelming consensus among experts

19 is that the method used to construct the CPI and

20 the current calculation of the CPI both overstate the

21 estimate of the true cost of living.

22 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

23 Senate that—

24 (1) a temporary advisory commission should be

25 established to make objective and nonpartisan rec-
86

•SCON 13 PCS

1 ommendations concerning the appropriateness and

2 accuracy of the methodology and calculations that

3 determine the CPI;

4 (2) the Commission should be appointed on a

5 nonpartisan basis, and should be composed of ex6 perts in the fields of economics, statistics, or other

7 related professions; and

8 (3) the Commission should report its rec9 ommendations to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and

10 to Congress at the earliest possible date.

11 SEC. 305. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS ON A UNIFORM AC12 COUNTING SYSTEM IN THE FEDERAL GOV13 ERNMENT.

14 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds the following:

15 (1) Much effort has been devoted to strengthen16 ing Federal internal accounting controls in the past.

17 Although progress has been made in recent years,

18 there still exists no uniform Federal accounting sys19 tem for Federal Government entities and institu20 tions.

21 (2) As a result, Federal financial management

22 continues to be seriously deficient, and Federal fi23 nancial management and fiscal practices have failed

24 to identify costs, failed to reflect the total liabilities

25 of congressional actions, and failed to accurately re-
87

•SCON 13 PCS

1 port the financial condition of the Federal Govern2 ment.

3 (3) Current Federal accounting practices do not

4 adequately report financial problems of the Federal

5 Government or the full cost of programs and activi6 ties. The continued use of these practices under7 mines the Government’s ability to provide credible

8 and reliable financial data, encourages already wide9 spread waste and inefficiency, and will not assist in

10 achieving a balanced budget.

11 (4) Waste and inefficiency in Federal Govern12 ment undermine the confidence of the American peo13 ple in the Government and reduces the Federal Gov14 ernment’s ability to address adequately vital public

15 needs.

16 (5) To rebuild the accountability and credibility

17 of the Federal Government, and restore public con18 fidence in the Federal Government, a uniform Fed19 eral accounting system, that fully meets the account20 ing standards and reporting objectives for the Fed21 eral Government, must be immediately established so

22 that all assets and liabilities, revenues and expendi23 tures or expenses, and the full cost of programs and

24 activities of the Federal Government can be consist25 ently and accurately recorded, monitored, and uni-
88

•SCON 13 PCS

1 formly reported throughout all government entities

2 for control and management evaluation purposes.

3 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

4 Congress that—

5 (1) a uniform Federal accounting system should

6 be established to consistently compile financial data

7 across the Federal Government, and to make full

8 disclosure of Federal financial data, including the

9 full cost of Federal programs and activities, to the

10 citizens, the Congress, the President, and agency

11 management; and

12 (2) beginning with fiscal year 1997, the Presi13 dent should require the heads of agencies to—

14 (A) implement and maintain a uniform

15 Federal accounting system; and

16 (B) provide financial statements;

17 in accordance with generally accepted accounting

18 principles applied on a consistent basis and estab19 lished in accordance with proposed Federal account20 ing standards and interpretations recommended by

21 the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

22 and other applicable law.
89

•SCON 13 PCS

1 SEC. 306. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS THAT 90 PERCENT OF

2 THE BENEFITS OF ANY TAX CUTS MUST GO

3 TO THE MIDDLE CLASS.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the incomes of middle-class families have

6 stagnated since the early 1980’s, with family in7 comes growing more slowly between 1979 and 1989

8 than in any other business cycle since World War II;

9 and

10 (2) according to the Department of the Treas11 ury, in 1996, approximately 90 percent of American

12 families will have incomes less than $100,000.

13 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the

14 Congress that if the 1996 Concurrent Budget Resolution

15 includes any cut in taxes, approximately 90 percent of the

16 benefits of these tax cuts must go to working families with

17 incomes less than $100,000.

18 SEC. 307. BIPARTISAN COMMISSION ON THE SOLVENCY OF

19 MEDICARE.

20 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that—

21 (1) the Health Insurance for the Aged Act,

22 which created the medicare program, was enacted on

23 July 30, 1965, and, therefore, the medicare program

24 will celebrate its 30-year anniversary on July 30,

25 1995;
90

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (2) on April 3, 1995, the Trustees of medicare

2 submitted their 1995 Annual Report on the Status

3 of the medicare program to the Congress;

4 (3) the Trustees of medicare have concluded

5 that ‘‘the medicare program is clearly unsustainable

6 in its present form’’;

7 (4) the Trustees of medicare have concluded

8 that ‘‘the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which

9 pays inpatient hospital expenses, will be able to pay

10 benefits for only about 7 years and is severely out

11 of financial balance in the long range’’;

12 (5) the Public Trustees of medicare have con13 cluded that ‘‘the Supplementary Medical Insurance

14 Trust Fund shows a rate of growth of costs which

15 is clearly unsustainable’’;

16 (6) the Trustees of medicare have recommended

17 ‘‘legislation to reestablish the Quadrennial Advisory

18 Council that will help lead to effective solutions to

19 the problems of the program’’;

20 (7) the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement

21 and Tax Reform concluded that, absent long-term

22 changes in medicare, projected medicare outlays will

23 increase from about 4 percent of the payroll tax base

24 today to over 15 percent of the payroll tax base by

25 the year 2030;
91

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (8) the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement

2 and Tax Reform recommended, by a vote of 30 to

3 1, that spending and revenues available for medicare

4 must be brought into long-term balance;

5 (9) the Public Trustees of medicare have con6 cluded that ‘‘We had hoped for several years that

7 comprehensive health reform would include meaning8 ful medicare reforms. However, with the results of

9 the last Congress, it is now clear that medicare re10 form needs to be addressed urgently as a distinct

11 legislative initiative’’; and

12 (10) the Public Trustees of medicare ‘‘strongly

13 recommend that the crisis presented by the financial

14 condition of the medicare trust funds be urgently ad15 dressed on a comprehensive basis, including a review

16 of the programs’s financing methods, benefit provi17 sions, and delivery mechanisms.’’.

18 (b) SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.—It is the sense of

19 the Congress that—

20 (1) a special bipartisan commission should be

21 established immediately to make recommendations

22 concerning the most appropriate response to the

23 short-term solvency and long-term sustainability is24 sues facing medicare;
92

•SCON 13 PCS

1 (2) the commission should report to Congress

2 its recommendations on the appropriate response to

3 the short-term solvency of medicare by July 10,

4 1995, in order that the committees of jurisdiction

5 may consider those recommendations in fashioning

6 an appropriate congressional response; and

7 (3) the commission should report its rec8 ommendations to respond to the Public Trustees’

9 call to make medicare’s financial condition sustain10 able over the long term to Congress by February 1,

11 1996.

12 SEC. 308. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF

13 AGRICULTURE SAVINGS.

14 It is the sense of the Senate that, in response to the

15 reconciliation instructions in section 6 of this resolution,

16 the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and For17 estry should provide that no more than 20 percent of the

18 savings be achieved in commodity programs.

19 SEC. 309. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING PROTEC20 TION OF CHILDREN’S HEALTH.

21 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

22 (1) Today’s children and the next generation

23 are the prime beneficiaries of the benefits of attain24 ing a balanced Federal budget. Without a balanced

25 budget, today’s children must bear the increasing
93

•SCON 13 PCS

1 burden of the Federal debt. Continued deficit spend2 ing would doom future generations to slower eco3 nomic growth and lower living standards.

4 (2) The health of children is essential to the fu5 ture economic and social well-being of the Nation.

6 (3) Medicaid covers one in four children and

7 one in three births. Nearly 60 percent of children

8 covered by medicaid are from working families.

9 (4) While children represent one-half of all peo10 ple eligible for medicaid, they account for less than

11 25 percent of medicaid expenditures.

12 (5) Medicaid provides a broad range of services

13 essential for the health of a significant portion of the

14 Nation’s children with disabilities.

15 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the

16 Congress that—

17 (1) the health care needs of low-income preg18 nant women and children should be a top priority;

19 (2) careful study must be made of the impact

20 of medicaid reform proposals on children’s health

21 and on vital sources of care including children’s hos22 pitals and community and migrant health centers;

23 and

24 (3) medicaid reform legislation which would

25 allow greater State flexibility in the delivery of care
94

•SCON 13 PCS

1 and in the control of the rate of growth in costs of

2 the program should also encourage States to place

3 a priority on coverage for pregnant women and chil4 dren.

5 SEC. 310. SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT LOBBYING EX6 PENSES SHOULD REMAIN NONDEDUCTIBLE.

7 (a) FINDINGS.—The Senate finds that ordinary

8 Americans generally are not allowed to deduct the costs

9 of communicating with their elected representatives.

10 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the

11 Senate that lobbying expenses should not be tax deduct12 ible.

13 SEC. 311. EXPATRIATE TAXES.

14 It is the sense of the Senate that—

15 (1) Congress should revise the Internal Revenue

16 Code to ensure that very wealthy individuals are not

17 able to reduce or avoid their United States income,

18 estate, or gift tax liability by relinquishing their

19 United States citizenship; and

20 (2) the increased revenues resulting from the

21 revision should be used to reduce the deficit.

SCON 13 PCS——2

SCON 13 PCS——3

SCON 13 PCS——4

SCON 13 PCS——5
95

•SCON 13 PCS

SCON 13 PCS——6

SCON 13 PCS——7