alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-12-00211-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 26, 2012

IN RE TIMOTHY N. MIDDLETON, RELATOR

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

	On May 23, 2012, relator Timothy N. Middleton filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the District Court of Wilbarger County, Texas.  

By letter of June 1, 2012, we notified relator the required filing fee remained unpaid and explained the proceeding would be dismissed unless the filing fee was paid by June 11, 2012.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1, 42.3(c).  Relator did not pay the fee or file an affidavit of indigence.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(c).  

								James T. Campbell

									Justice

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-06-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,917
<PP&E>                                          26,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,051
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,202
<SALES>                                          2,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,063
<CGS>                                            2,411
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (21)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)

 

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| Dated: April 27, 2015  | By:   /s/ Porfirio González Álvarez |   |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        | Name:   Porfirio González Álvarez   |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        | Title: Chief Executive Officer                |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
| Dated: April 27 , 2015 | By:   /s/ José Luis Guerrero Cortés |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        | Name:   José Luis Guerrero Cortés   |   |
|                        |                                          |   |
|                        | Title: Chief Financial Officer                |   |

 

----
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                           |   |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |         /s/ Richard H.      Bachmann                              |   |
| Name:                               | Richard      H. Bachmann                                                                                       |   |
| Title:                              | Chief      Executive Officer of DEP Holdings, LLC,the      General Partner of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. |   |
|  Date:     |  March      2, 2009                                                                                  |   |
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Gazit-Globe
Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adi Jemini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 21, 2016   | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Adi Jemini          | 
|Adi Jemini              | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.16(b)

                                       July 2, 2001


Ms. Trudy Briley
DSM Catalytica Pharmaceuticals
P.O. Box 1887
Greenville, NC 27835-1887

         Re:      Amendment No. 1 to Toll Manufacturing and Packaging Agreement
                  -------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Ms. Briley:

         This letter is to confirm our understanding concerning an amendment to
be made with respect to the Toll Manufacturing and Packaging Agreement dated as
of August 24, 1999 (the "Agreement"), between Cephalon, Inc. ("Cephalon") and
DSM Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Catalytica"). All terms not otherwise
defined herein are used as defined in the Agreement.

         The purpose of this Amendment is to increase the minimum annual
quantities of Product to be purchased by Cephalon and to increase the
manufacturing capacity reserved by Catalytica for the remainder of the Initial
Term of the Agreement.

         The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       Existing Schedule F of the Agreement relating to Minimum
Quantities shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached
revised Schedule F.

         2.       Except as amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect.

         If the foregoing accurately reflects your understanding as to these
matters, please indicate your agreement in the space provided below, and return
one fully-executed original to me.

                                       Very truly yours,



                                       \s\ Robert Urban
                                       Vice President, Technical Operations

Acknowledged and agreed to by:

DSM CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

By: \s\ Michael H. Thomas
    --------------------------------
Name: Michael H. Thomas
Title: President & CEO




      **Certain portions of this document have been omitted based upon a
request for confidential treatment that has been filed with the Commission.
The omitted portions have been filed separately with the Commission.0


<PAGE>

                                  Schedule F
                                  ----------

                              Minimum Quantities
                              ------------------

The minimum annual quantities to be purchased by CEPHALON and capacity to be
reserved by CATALYTICA, are as follows for the remainder of the Initial Term of
this Agreement:

              Year    Quantity
              ----    --------
              2001    [**]

              2002    [**]

              2003    [**]

              2004    [**]

Pursuant to Section 3.1, if the actual annual quantity exceeds the minimum
annual quantity in any year by twenty-five percent (25%) or less, this excess
will reduce the minimum annual quantity in the following year






                                      A-1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6081

In Re: MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-85-547-Y, CA-99-1191-Y) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 6, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Cortez Proctor, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Maurice Cortez Proctor brought this petition for writ of mandamus requesting this court to order the district court to entertain and hear his motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), in which he seeks to vacate his judgment and sentence and to be resentenced. The district court construed the motion as one pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999), and dismissed it without prejudice to Proctor’s ability to move in the court of appeals for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). Proctor has not met his burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his right to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Proctor could have noted an appeal from the district court’s order, see In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979) (mandamus not a substitute for appeal), or he could file a motion in this courtseeking authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. Therefore, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RAMP SERIES 2006-RZ5 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
    Name: Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Managing Director
#### Carlos TORO, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

2016-1960

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 12, 2017

*970Michael L. Avery, Sr., The Avery Law Firm, Falls Church, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael Anthony Rodriguez, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Deborah A. By-num.

(Dyk, Moore, and Reyna, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ben Yan, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sino Fibre Communications, Inc.

Date:  April 22, 2008

/s/ Ben Yan
Ben Yan
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Sino Fibre Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 32

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Monday, November 20, 1995,

4 pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his

5 designee, in accordance with this resolution, it stand re6 cessed or adjourned until a time to be determined by the

7 Majority Leader on Monday, November 27, 1995, or until

8 one hour after the House has voted on H.J. Res. 122,

9 unless the House agrees to the Senate amendment.

10 SEC. 2. The two Houses shall convene at 12:00 noon

11 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem12 ble pursuant to section 3 of this resolution, whichever oc13 curs first; and that when the House of Representatives

14 adjourns on the legislative day of Monday, November 20,

15 1995, or the legislative day of Tuesday, November 21,

16 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday,

17 November 28, 1995, or until 12:00 noon on the second

18 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

19 section 3 of this resolution, whichever occurs first.
2

SCON 32 ES

1 SEC 3. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

2 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

3 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and Minority

4 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen5 ate and the House, respectively, to reassemble whenever,

6 in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate November 20, 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 32

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional recess or adjournment

vember 28, 1995.Tuesday, November 21, 1995, until Tuesday, Notive day of Monday, November 20, 1995, ortional adjournment of the House on the legislauntil Monday, November 27, 1995, and a condiof the Senate on Monday, November 20, 1995,
Exhibit 10.01.f.2



                                                                    ANNEX B

                                   OPTION
                                   ------

         If, at any time prior to December 31, 2001, the Project has not
sold a minimum of 70 percent of the output of the Project (up to a maximum
of 350,000 tons of Product per year) under contracts extending through
December 31, 2001, then KECC or its Affiliates will have the option to
enter into a contract to purchase the tonnage necessary to increase the
amount of output of the Project under contracts extending through December
31, 2001, to 70 percent of the output of the Project (up to a maximum of
350,000 tons of Product per year). Such contract may be entered into at any
time (prior to December 31, 2001) during the period beginning on the date
on which a proposal for a Commercial Project (including, without
limitation, a completed Feasibility Study) is submitted to the Members for
approval as provided in the LLC Agreement and the date on which KECC or its
Affiliate elects to approve such Commercial Project pursuant to the
procedures set out in the LLC Agreement. The price per ton of such Product,
F.O.B. the Project, shall be the price set forth with respect to such
tonnage under the lines "Utility #1 Index Coal Cost ($/ton)" and "Other
Utility Purchase Price ($/ton)" on the first page of the proforma
projections attached to the Partnership Agreement applicable to the tonnage
purchased and the year in which such Product is delivered. Such prices may
be escalated as provided in such proforma (a copy of which is attached
hereto with such lines highlighted).
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6228 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6228

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
         alternative fuel and alternative fuel mixture credits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2016

 Mr. Boustany introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and modify the 
         alternative fuel and alternative fuel mixture credits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE FUEL AND 
              ALTERNATIVE FUEL MIXTURE CREDITS.

    (a) Extension and Alternative Fuel and Alternative Fuel Mixture 
Credits.--
            (1) Alternative fuel credit.--Section 6426(d)(5) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 
        31, 2016'' and inserting ``December 31, 2021''.
            (2) Alternative fuel mixture credit.--Section 6426(e)(3) of 
        such Code is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' and 
        inserting ``December 31, 2021''.
            (3) Outlay payments for alternative fuels.--Section 
        6427(e)(6)(C) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2016'' and 
        inserting ``December 31, 2021''.
    (b) Alternative Fuel Credit Allowed for Fuel Used in Qualifying 
Landscape Equipment.--
            (1) In general.--Section 6426(d)(1) of such Code is amended 
        by inserting ``sold by the taxpayer for use as fuel in 
        qualifying landscape equipment,'' after ``in aviation,''.
            (2) Qualifying landscape equipment.--Section 6426(d) of 
        such Code, as amended by subsection (a)(1), is amended by 
        redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (5) and (6), 
        respectively, and by inserting after paragraph (3) the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Qualifying landscape equipment.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `qualifying landscape equipment' means any 
        equipment which--
                    ``(A) is of a type used in landscaping or similar 
                activities,
                    ``(B) is powered by an engine capable of running 
                only on alternative fuel, and
                    ``(C) is not designed primarily for carrying or 
                towing persons or loads from one place to another.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to fuel sold or used after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1109

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Anibal Carbajal-Galvan

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

 ____________

 Submitted: July 24, 2019

 Filed: July 29, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Anibal Carbajal-Galvan directly appeals after he pled guilty to illegal reentry,

and the district court sentenced him to a prison term below the calculated United

1

The HonorableBeth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual range. His counsel has moved to

withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

questioning whether Carbajal-Galvan received ineffective assistance of counsel, and

whether Carbajal-Galvan’s prison term is substantively unreasonable.

Initially, we decline to consider any ineffective-assistance claims on direct

appeal. See United States v. Hernandez, 281 F.3d 746, 749 (8th Cir. 2002) (noting

generally an ineffective-assistance claim, not cognizable on direct appeal, is properly

raised in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 action). We further conclude the district court did not

impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572

F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential

abuse-of-discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness). In addition,

having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-