alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 709 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To provide for the termination of employment of employees 

of the Internal Revenue Service who take certain official 

actions for political purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 709 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Targeting at 

3 the IRS Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF INTERNAL REV5 ENUE SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR TAKING OF6 FICIAL ACTIONS FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (10) of section 

8 1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring 

9 and Reform Act of 1998 is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(10) performing, delaying, or failing to per11 form (or threatening to perform, delay, or fail to 

12 perform) any official action (including any audit) 

13 with respect to a taxpayer for purpose of extracting 

14 personal gain or benefit or for a political purpose.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

17 of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
III

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 16

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Russian Federation should

be strongly condemned for its plan to provide nuclear technology to

Iran, and that such nuclear transfer would make Russia ineligible under

terms of the Freedom Support Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 25 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Ms. SNOWE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Russian Federation should be strongly condemned for its plan to

provide nuclear technology to Iran, and that such nuclear

transfer would make Russia ineligible under terms of

the Freedom Support Act.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

4 (1) Iran is aggressively pursuing a program to

5 acquire and/or develop nuclear weapons;
2

SCON 16 IS

1 (2) the Director of Central Intelligence, in Sep2 tember of 1994, confirmed that Iran is manufactur3 ing and stockpiling chemical weapons;

4 (3) Iran has opposed the Middle East peace

5 process and continues to support the terrorist group

6 Hezballah in Lebanon and radical Palestinian

7 groups;

8 (4) Iran has asserted control over the Persian

9 Gulf island of Abu Musa, which it had been pre10 viously sharing with the United Arab Emirates;

11 (5) during the last few years Iran has report12 edly acquired several hundred improved Scud mis13 siles from North Korea;

14 (6) Iran has moved modern air defense missile

15 systems, tanks, additional troops, artillery, and a

16 surface-to-surface missiles onto islands in the Per17 sian Gulf, some of which are disputed between Iran

18 and the United Arab Emirates;

19 (7) Iran has already taken delivery of as many

20 as thirty modern Mig-29 fighter aircraft from the

21 Russian Federation;

22 (8) The Russian Federation has sold modern

23 conventionally powered submarines to Iran, which

24 increase Iran’s capability to blockade the Straits of

25 Hormuz and the Persian Gulf; and
3

SCON 16 IS

1 (9) the Russian Federation has continued to

2 pursue a commercial agreement intended to provide

3 Iran with nuclear technology despite being provided

4 with a detailed description by the President of the

5 United States of Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

6 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con7 gress that the Russian Federation should be strongly con8 demned if it continues with a commercial agreement to

9 provide Iran with nuclear technology which would assist

10 that country in its development of nuclear weapons, and,

11 if such transfer occurs, that Russia would be ineligible for

12 assistance under the terms of the Freedom Support Act.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 14, 2019

No. 04-18-00532-CR

Daniel Cervantes SALAZAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR6992

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his motion for rehearing is granted. 

Having considered the motion for rehearing, we deny the motion.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of August, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Paul Edwards, certify that:
1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in

respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed Callable Trust Certificates, J.C.
Penney Debenture-Backed Series 2006-1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain

any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and other information required to be
provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4.

Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under

Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing, or similar, agreement in all material respects; and
5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed

securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
Date: March 28, 2023

By:
/s/ Paul Edwards
Name:    Paul Edwards
Title:   Vice President
(Senior Officer of the Depositor)
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PURE Bioscience (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



December 15, 2003                /s/ Michael L. Krall
------------------------         --------------------------
                                     Michael L. Krall
                                     Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PURE Bioscience, (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary
Brownell, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

December 15, 2003                     /s/ Gary Brownell
------------------------              -----------------------------------
                                          Gary Brownell
                                          Chief Financial Officer
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 965

AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse for the Eastern

District of Virginia in Alexandria, Virginia, as the Albert

V. Bryan United States Courthouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 965 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ALBERT V. BRYAN UNITED

2 STATES COURTHOUSE.

3 (a) NEW COURTHOUSE.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building located

5 at Courthouse Square South and Jamieson Avenue

6 in Alexandria, Virginia, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States

8 Courthouse’’.

9 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

10 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of

11 the United States to the Federal building referred to

12 in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference

13 to the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse’’.

14 (b) OLD COURTHOUSE.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Federal building located

16 at 200 South Washington Street in Alexandria, Vir17 ginia, shall not be known and designated as the

18 ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse’’.

19 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law,

20 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of

21 the United States to the Federal building known and

22 designated prior to the effective date of this section

23 as the ‘‘Albert V. Bryan United States Courthouse’’

24 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Federal

25 building referred to in paragraph (1).
3

S 965 ES

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall become ef2 fective on the date of the completion of the construction

3 of the Federal building referred to in subsection (a)(1).

Passed the Senate August 9 (legislative day, July

10), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 965

AN ACT

To designate the United States Courthouse for the

Courthouse.ginia, as the Albert V. Bryan United StatesEastern District of Virginia in Alexandria, Vir-
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.56  


 
 

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
  TO THE
  UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.
  EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN    
  


        This Amendment Number One (the "Amendment") to the Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is hereby duly adopted,
approved, ratified and confirmed by the Board of Directors of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). All capitalized terms used herein but not defined
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan. 


        WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Company previously adopted the Plan; 


        WHEREAS,
Section 9.01 of the Plan reserves to the Company the right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow commissions to be included in the pay from which stock can be purchased in accordance with the Plan; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Board of Directors hereby amends the Plan as follows: 


        1.    Section 2.01,
"Base Pay" is deleted, and Sections 2.02, 2.03 and 2.04 are hereby amended by renumbering them as Sections 2.01, 2.02 and 2.03, respectively. 



        2.    Article II
of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following as a new Section 2.04: 




"Eligible
Pay" means regular straight-time earnings, including commissions, but excluding payments for overtime, shift premium, bonuses and other incentive and special payments. 





        3.    Section 5.02
of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the term "Base Pay" everywhere it appears and replacing it with the term "Eligible Pay." In addition, the
sentence that begins "In the case of a part-time hourly Employee" is amended to read as follows: 




In
the case of a part-time hourly Employee, such Employee's Eligible Pay during an Offering shall be determined by multiplying such Employee's hourly rate of pay in effect on the Offering
Commencement Date by the number of regularly scheduled hours of work for such Employee during such Offering and adding any payments received as commissions. 





        4.    Section 5.03
of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the term "Base Pay" everywhere it appears and replacing it with the term "Eligible Pay." 


        5.    Section 6.02
of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the term "Base Pay" everywhere it appears and replacing it with the term "Eligible Pay." 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, constituting all of the members of the Company's Board of Directors, adopt and declare effective this Amendment on Dec. 20, 2001. 



	 	 	By:	 	/s/  STEPHEN A. SNIDER      
 Stephen A. Snider

Director
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ERNIE L. DANNER      
 Ernie L. Danner

Director











QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.5

ROSS MILLER
Secretary of State
254 Norht Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(776) 684 5708
Website:  secretaryofstate.biz

Certificate of Amendment
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)

                                              ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of Corporation:

OnePak, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

Article 3 is amended by adding the following language:

The Company's Board of Directors are authorized to fix and determine in a
resolution, the classes, series and numbers of each class or series of shares of
the Corporation that are authorized to be issued.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 62.8%

4. Effective date of filing (optional):
(must be no later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)


5. Officer Signature (Required)  /s/ Steven Andon
                                ------------------------------
* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preferences or any
relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then
the amendment must be approved by the vote. In addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6996

JESSE JAMES PRITCHARD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GEORGE HINKLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00129-CMH)

Submitted: March 28, 2008 Decided: April 21, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pritchard has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. The motion to compel

prison officials to return legal documents is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### YO, f/k/a Mario L. Ballard, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARK, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-7101

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 19, 2017

Decided: December 22, 2017

Yo, Appellant Pro Se. Victoria Lee Johnson, Laura Maughan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

*159Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. '

PER CURIAM:

Yo seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.'The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v.*McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Yo has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         5,175,577
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  265,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    204,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,645,103
<PP&E>                                         1,255,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 724,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,570,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,276,959
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       40,983
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,696,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,570,111
<SALES>                                        2,710,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,710,856
<CGS>                                          843,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  843,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               37,686,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (677,450)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (35,083,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,083,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35,083,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (17.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (17.55)


</TABLE>