alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                       233
<INVENTORY>                                      7,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,846
<PP&E>                                          15,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,472
<SALES>                                          4,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,392
<CGS>                                            2,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    973
<INCOME-TAX>                                       438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.04
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Cienega Creek Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),
the undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,
herby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  August 13, 2008


/s/ Michael A. Klinicki
-------------------------------------
Michael A. Klinicki, President and C.E.O.
(principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Theodore A. Boutacoff, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of IRIDEX Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 27, 2008 (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IRIDEX Corporation.

Date: November 4, 2008



By:

/s/ THEODORE A. BOUTACOFFName: Theodore A. BoutacoffTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)
S. Con. Res. 32 Agreed to November 20, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Monday, November 20, 1995, pursuant to a motion

made by the Majority Leader or his designee, in accordance with

this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned until a time to

be determined by the Majority Leader on Monday, November 27,

1995, or until one hour after the House has voted on H.J. Res.

122, unless the House agrees to the Senate amendment.

SEC. 2. The two Houses shall convene at 12:00 noon on the

second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant

to section 3 of this resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

when the House of Representatives adjourns on the legislative

day of Monday, November 20, 1995, or the legislative day of Tuesday, November 21, 1995, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on

Tuesday, November 28, 1995, or until 12:00 noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

3 of this resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC 3. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and the House, respectively,
S. Con. Res. 32—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,695
<SECURITIES>                                     3,445
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (347)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,245
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,189
<PP&E>                                           4,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,537)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,466
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,433
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,618)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,297
<SALES>                                          3,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,600
<CGS>                                            1,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (204)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,292)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Merrill
      Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.


250
      Vesey
      Street


4
      World
      Financial Center, 10th Floor


New
      York,
      New York 10080





National
      City Home Loan Services, Inc.


150
      Allegheny Center Mall


Pittsburgh,
      Pennsylvania 15212





Attention:
      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Series 2006-FF1





Re:
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 1,
      2006,
      among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as depositor, National City Home
      Loan Services, Inc., as servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as
      trustee, relating to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan
      Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-FF1





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 65

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Members should understand and

use the Internet to improve the democratic process and to communicate

with the Internet community.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. PRESSLER (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Members should

understand and use the Internet to improve the democratic process and to communicate with the Internet

community.

Whereas approximately 18,000,000 people use the Internet

and nearly 100,000,000 expect to use it by 1998;

Whereas the Internet is changing the way the world communicates, conducts business, and educates;

Whereas the Internet can lead to a more open democratic

process if fully utilized by elected representatives;

Whereas many Members of the House of Representatives and

Senate do not use electronic mail or World Wide Web

sites;
2

SCON 65 IS

Whereas an increase in the usage and knowledge by Members

of the Internet will lead to better policy decisions regarding the Internet and better communications with the

Internet community: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) Congress should educate itself about the

4 Internet and use the technology in personal, commit5 tee, and leadership offices;

6 (2) Congress should work in a bipartisan and

7 bicameral fashion to facilitate the growth and ad8 vancement of the Internet;

9 (3) Congress should maximize the openness of

10 and participation in government by the people via

11 the Internet so that our constituents can have more

12 information from and more access to their elected

13 representatives;

14 (4) Congress should promote commerce and

15 free flow of information on the Internet;

16 (5) Congress should advance the United States’

17 world leadership in the digital world by avoiding the

18 passage of laws that stifle innovation and increase

19 regulation of the Internet; and
3

SCON 65 IS

1 (6) Congress should work with the Internet

2 community to receive its input on the issues affect3 ing the Internet that come before Congress.

Æ
#### Josephine MCALLISTER, et al., Appellants v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee

No. 16-7035

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 25, 2017

Douglas William Tyrka, Tyrka *&*Associates, LLC, McLean, VA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Todd Sunhwae Kim, Solicitor General, Richard Stuart Love, Assistant Attorney General, Karl A. Racine, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: Tatel and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs and arguments of the parties, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the District Court be AFFIRMED.

Appellants, the parents of children who prevailed in part in proceedings brought pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400*et seq.,*appeal from a judgment denying in part their request for attorneys’ fees for time spent obtaining fees for their underlying IDEA cases. Appellants argue that the district court abused its discretion by failing to address declarations filed with their reply brief and by relying on other district court fee awards as evidence of the prevailing market rate for IDEA fee litigation. Appellants contend, specifically, that the decisions cited by the district court lack any evidence of market rates in the Washington, D.C. area.

We reject both arguments. The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to address two cursory declarations, which contain no mention of specific rates and were submitted for the first time with *647plaintiffs’ reply. Nor did the court err in relying on other fee decisions, three of which referred to the *Laffey*matrix, a schedule of market rates for complex federal litigation in Washington, D.C. *See Covington v. District of Columbia,*57 F.3d 1101, 1109 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (noting that, to demonstrate the prevailing market rate, plaintiffs may “provide ... evidence of recent fees awarded by the courts”); *National Association of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense,*675 F.2d 1319, 1325 n.7 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (“[D]ata about fee awards in other cases help to ensure comparable treatment of like cases.”); *cf. Eley v. District of Columbia,*793 F.3d 97, 100-01 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (discussing *Laffey*matrices and explaining that such “fee matrices [are] one type of evidence that ‘provide[s] a useful starting point’ in calculating the prevailing market rate” (quoting *Covington,*57 F.3d at 1109)).

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R. Apr P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MINDSPRING ENTERPRISES FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       7,317,440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,495,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                   443,195
<INVENTORY>                                     81,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,249,354
<PP&E>                                      24,077,187
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,973,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,819,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,029,711
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,305
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,828,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,819,460
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,347,659
<CGS>                                       11,742,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,738,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,026,385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,581,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,581,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,581,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5946 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5946

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the 
                           Paralympic Games.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Appreciation for 
Olympians and Paralympians Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MEDALS AND USOC PRIZE MONEY EXCLUDED 
              FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 74 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Exception for Olympic and Paralympic Medals and Prizes.--
            ``(1) In general.--Gross income shall not include the value 
        of any medal awarded in, or any prize money received from the 
        United States Olympic Committee on account of, competition in 
        the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games.
            ``(2) Limitation based on adjusted gross income.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to 
                any taxpayer for any taxable year if the adjusted gross 
                income (determined without regard to this subsection) 
                of such taxpayer for such taxable year exceeds 
                $1,000,000 (half of such amount in the case of a 
                married individual filing a separate return).
                    ``(B) Coordination with other limitations.--For 
                purposes of sections 86, 135, 137, 199, 219, 221, 222, 
                and 469, adjusted gross income shall be determined 
                after the application of paragraph (1) and before the 
                application of subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to prizes and awards received after December 31, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5946

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
  any prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the 
                           Paralympic Games.
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 830

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraud and false

statements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 18 (legislative day, MAY 15), 1995

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to

fraud and false statements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS IN MATTERS

4 WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS

5 OR CONGRESS.

6 Section 1001 of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended by striking ‘‘any department or agency of the

8 United States’’ and inserting ‘‘any department, agency, or
2

•S 830 IS

1 court of the United States, or of Congress or any duly

2 constituted committee or subcommittee of Congress,’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of**

**the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James A. Courter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: December 10, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDTCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.