alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                               NAVARRE CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 10.2



                               PART TIME AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 2nd day of January, 2002, by and
between NAVARRE CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation ("Company"), and CHARLES
E. CHENEY, the Company's Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and
Treasurer ("Executive").

The Company and Executive mutually desire to enter into this Part Time Agreement
to facilitate the Executive's desire to complete his law degree. The Executive
commits to returning to the Company upon completion of law school. The terms and
conditions are outlined below:

1.   Executive will perform Navarre business activity as a consultant being paid
     $250 per hour to a maximum annual fee of $135,000.

2.   As a consultant, the Executive will have responsibility for treasury,
     legal, human resources, and operations functions.

3.   Executive remains head of the Finance Committee.

4.   Executive will remain the Company's Vice Chairman of the Board.

5.   Executive agrees to attend all Board and Board Committee meetings.

6.   Executive will retain all current employee benefits to include medical,
     dental, life, STD, LTD, and 401K account.

7.   The Company agrees to pay for the Executive's law school tuition and books
     during the term of this Agreement.

8.   The term of this Agreement shall be for one (1) year.

9.   The Board of Directors, at its sole discretion, shall determine whether any
     bonus shall be paid to Consultant.

The parties below have executed this Consultant Agreement as of the date first
set forth above.


NAVARRE CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation



By:                                          By:
     ------------------------------               ------------------------------
     Eric H. Paulson                              Charles E. Cheney
Its: President and Chairman                  Its: Vice Chairman
EUGENE LUCAS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2119

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela Cox , Judge

.

Eugene Lucas, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 966

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1996

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Nathan C. Vance, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 966 RFH

1 SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO NATHAN C. VANCE.

2 (a) PAYMENT.—Subject to subsections (b) and (c),

3 the Secretary of Agriculture shall pay $4,850.00 to Na4 than C. Vance of Wyoming for fire loss arising out of the

5 Mink Area Fire in and around Yellowstone National Park

6 in 1988.

7 (b) SOURCE OF FUNDS.—The Secretary of the Treas8 ury shall pay the amount specified in subsection (a) from

9 amounts made available under section 1304 of title 31,

10 United States Code.

11 (c) CONDITION OF PAYMENT.—The payment made

12 pursuant to subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of

13 the claim of Nathan C. Vance against the United States,

14 for fire loss arising out of the Mink Area Fire, that was

15 received by the Forest Service in August 1990.

Passed the Senate April 30, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
#### Harold CORTES; Julie Cortes, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

Nos. 15-71128, 15-71129

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017 *

Filed July 7, 2017

Harold Cortes, Pro Se

Julie Cortes, Pro Se

Paul Andrew Allulis, Francesca Ugolini, Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Harold and Julie Cortes appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s decisions, following a trial, sustaining the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies and penalties for tax years 2007 through 2009. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions and for clear error its factual findings. *Gardner v. Comm’r,*845 F.3d 971, 975 (9th Cir. 2017). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly sustained the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies on the basis that the Corteses had complete dominion and control over the payments deposited into the Living Water Ministries accounts. *See id.*at 976-78 (affirming Tax Court’s conclusion that deposits were taxable income because, despite vow of poverty, petitioners retained complete control over them).

The Tax Court properly found that the Corteses were liable for accuracy-related penalties for underpayments during tax years 2007 through 2009. *See*26 U.S.C. § 6662(a), (b) (accuracy-related penalties); *Hansen v. Comm’r,*471 F.3d 1021, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining that accuracy-related penalty on underpayment of tax may be assessed due to taxpayer’s negligence).

The Commissioner’s motion to strike the Corteses’ Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) response letter is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio BAYRON-ARRIOLA, a.k.a. Julio Bayron Estrada-Arriola, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10099, No. 17-10100

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 27, 2017

Lawrence Lee, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Erica McCallum, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU-Offiee of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Julio Bayron-Arriola, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDJjAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Julio Bay-ron-Arriola appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bayron-Arrio-la’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Bayron-Arriola the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Bayron-Arriola waived his right to appeal his conviction, the revocation of supervised release, and his sentences. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waivers. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeals. *See id.*at

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6309 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6309

   To allow acceleration certificates awarded under the Patents for 
                  Humanity Program to be transferable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow acceleration certificates awarded under the Patents for 
                  Humanity Program to be transferable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patents for Humanity Program 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFERABILITY OF ACCELERATION CERTIFICATES.

    (a) In General.--A holder of an acceleration certificate issued 
pursuant to the Patents for Humanity Program (established in the notice 
entitled ``Humanitarian Awards Pilot Program'', published at 77 Fed. 
Reg. 6544 (February 8, 2012)), or any successor thereto, of the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, may transfer (including by sale) 
the entitlement to such acceleration certificate to another person.
    (b) Requirement.--An acceleration certificate transferred under 
subsection (a) shall be subject to any other applicable limitations 
under the notice entitled ``Humanitarian Awards Pilot Program'', 
published at 77 Fed. Reg. 6544 (February 8, 2012), or any successor 
thereto.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05540]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: Advisory Committee for Geosciences (1755).


DATE AND TIME: 

April 13, 2022; 11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. EDT
April 14, 2022; 11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. EDT


PLACE:  Virtual. Meeting registration information is available on the 
GEO Advisory Committee website at https://www.nsf.gov/geo/advisory.jsp).

TYPE OF MEETING:  Open.

CONTACT PERSON:  Melissa Lane, National Science Foundation, Room C 
8000, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; Phone 703-
292-8500.

Minutes:  May be obtained from the contact person listed above.

Purpose of Meeting:  To provide advice, recommendations, and oversight 
on support for geoscience research and education including atmospheric, 
geo-space, earth, ocean, and polar sciences.

Agenda

April 13, 2022

<bullet> Directorate and NSF activities and plans
<bullet> Update on Division and OPP Activities
<bullet> Discussion on Growing and Enhancing Access to Research 
Resources for all Institutions
<bullet> Discussion of Innovation and Partnerships

April 14, 2022

<bullet> Discussion of the NSF Learning Agenda Related to Climate 
Equity
<bullet> Meeting with the NSF Director and Chief Operating Officer
<bullet> Action Items/Planning for Fall 2022 Meeting

    Dated: March 11, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-05540 Filed 3-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Innovative  Medical  Services,  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the six month period  ending  January 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Michael L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




March 14, 2003              /s/ Michael L.Krall
-------------              --------------------------------------------
                               Michael L.Krall
                               Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Innovative  Medical  Services,  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the six month period  ending  January 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Gary Brownell,  Chief Financial Officer,  certify   pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




March 14, 2003              /s/ Gary Brownell
--------------             -------------------------------
                               Gary Brownell
                               Chief Financial Officer
#### KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John GERRITSMA, Field Manager, Ashland Resource Areas, Medford District, acting in his official capacity and Bureau of Land Management, an administrative agency of the U.S. Department of Interior, Defendants-Appellees, Rough & Ready Lumber Company; et al., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35811

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 27, 2017

D.C. No. l:12-cv-01166-PA, District of Oregon, Medford

*836Before: CANBY, CLIFTON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A review of the record and appellants’ response to the motion for summary affir-mance indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court did not err in its decision awarding costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920. *See In re Online DVD-Rental Antitrust Litigation,*779 F.3d 914, 924-34 (9th Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance (Docket Entry No. 9) is granted.

AFFIRMED.
#### Jose AGUILAR-CORTES, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70024

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

Filed November 20, 2017

Eduardo A. Paredes, Attorney, Law Office of Eduardo A. Paredes, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Lynda Do, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Aguilar-Cortes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual determinations regarding inadmissibility. *Abufayad v. Holder,*632 F.3d 623, 631 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review.

Aguilar-Cortes raises no contentions regarding the agency’s determination that the admissions and concessions in his written pleadings make him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(II) and therefore ineligible for adjustment of status, and thus he waives challenge to this dispositive determination. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(2) (to be eligible for adjustment of status, an alien must be admissible); 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(G)(i)(H) (any alien who has been ordered removed under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and reenters the United States without being admitted is inadmissible); *Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder,*706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived).

In light of this disposition, we need not address Aguilar-Cortes’ remaining contentions. *See Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (the court is not required to make findings on issues unnecessary to the result reached).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

JOSHUA THOMAS WRIGHT,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 418 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 25, 2019

NO. 03-19-00517-CV

Clyde Nubine, Appellant

v.

Texas Workforce Commission c/o, Mr. Paul Tabor; Travis County Shoe Hospital, Inc., c/o 

Mr. Carrol Kelly; Mr. Kaub Harper; and Mr. Raul, et al., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 459TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on April 29, 2019. Having reviewed the 

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 60 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 60

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 1996

   Mr. Lott submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the 
                       House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 23, 1996, Friday, May 24, 1996, or Saturday, May 25, 
1996, pursuant to a motion made by the majority leader or his designee 
in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned 
until noon on Monday, June 3, 1996, Tuesday, June 4, 1996 or until such 
time on that day as may be specified by the majority leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 23, 1996, it 
stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 29, 1996, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The majority leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the minority leader of 
the Senate and the minority leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 34 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 34

 To authorize the printing of ``Vice Presidents of the United States, 
                              1789-1993''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 1995

   Mr. Byrd submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the printing of ``Vice Presidents of the United States, 
                              1789-1993''.

Whereas the United States Constitution provides that the Vice President of the 
        United States shall serve as President of the Senate; and
Whereas the careers of the 44 Americans who held that post during the years 1789 
        through 1993 richly illustrate the development of the nation and its 
        government; and
Whereas the vice presidency, traditionally the least understood and most often 
        ignored constitutional office in the Federal Government, deserves wider 
        attention: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF THE ``VICE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 
              1789-1993''.

    (a) In General.--There shall be printed as a Senate document the 
book entitled ``Vice Presidents of the United States, 1789-1993'', 
prepared by the Senate Historical Office under the supervision of the 
Secretary of the Senate.
    (b) Specifications.--The Senate document described in subsection 
(a) shall include illustrations and shall be in the style, form, 
manner, and binding as directed by the Joint Committee on Printing 
after consultation with the Secretary of the Senate.
    (c) Number of Copies.--In addition to the usual number of copies, 
there shall be printed with suitable binding the lesser of--
            (1) 1,000 copies (750 paper bound and 250 case bound) for 
        the use of the Senate, to be allocated as determined by the 
        Secretary of the Senate; and
            (2) a number of copies that does not have a total 
        production and printing cost of more than $11,100.
                                 <all>
```