alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| Depositor:                              | Structured                Asset Securities CorporationAttention:                Mortgage Finance LXS 2006-19745                7th Avenue, 7th Floor New                York, NY 10019               |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Master                Servicer:         | Aurora                Loan Services LLCChris                Baker327                Inverness Drive SouthEnglewood,                CO 80112                                                          |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Trustee:                                | LaSalle                Bank, N.A.Attention:                Global Securitization Trust Services Group LXS 2006-19135                South LaSalle Street, Suite 1625Chicago,                IL 60603 |
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Subject:                                | Annual                Officer's Certification                                                                                                                                                        |
| Fiscal                Year:   | 2006                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Investor                Code:           | F86                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| Investor                Name:           | LXS                2006-19                                                                                                                                                                           |

|   | Certified                    by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By                    /s/                    Terry L. Gentry    |
|   | Name:                    Terry L. Gentry                        |
|   | Title:                    Managing Director                     |

----
Wachovia
                Securities8739
                Research Drive, URP4Charlotte,
                NC 28288











**1123
        SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE**
 
 Reference
        is hereby made to that certain Trust and Servicing Agreement dated as of
        November 13, 2006, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II,
        as
        Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR
        Partners, INC, as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
        Trustee , with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
        Series
        LB-UBS 2006-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
        defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
        to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy Ryan, and Marilyn Addison, Managing
        Director of Customer Relationship Management and Director of Compliance Third
        Party Oversight, do hereby certify that:
 
 1.
            A
                review of the activities of the Master Servicer, during the
                period November 13, 2006 to December 31, 2006 of its performance
                under the
                Agreement during such period has been made under our
                supervision; 
 2.
            To
                the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
                Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this
                Agreement in all material respects throughout the period November
                13, 2006
                through December 31, 2006; and 
 IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
        10th
        day of March 2007.
 
 
 /s/
                  Timothy Ryan
              /s/
                  Marilyn Addison, DirectorTimothy
                  Ryan, Managing Director
              Marilyn
                  Addison, DirectorWachovia
                  Bank National Association
              Wachovia
                  Bank National Association
 
 
 O:\Shared/SP/Income/Compliance
        3rdParty Oversight/Annual Certification/Certification_0307/2006 /LBUBS
        2006-C7
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PETER C. GNEHM and ROSA L. GNEHM,

Appellants,

v.

STATE FARM BANK,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2433

[September 2, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard H. Harrison, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502010CA020463XXXXMB.

Peter C. Gnehm, Lake Worth, pro se.

Kimberly Hopkins and Ronald M. Gache of Shapiro, Fishman & 

Gache, LLP, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

CIKLIN, C.J., GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgrou p.com July 22, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for ProCore Drones

, LLC Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, ProCore Drones, LLC

. , an aerial video and

photography service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft System s ( s UAS),

seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to allow

commercial operation of the Leptron RDASS and the Yuneec Q500 within the National

Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, aerial video and photography of Real

Estate Properties, (for homeowners, realtors, h ome builders, home contractors and / or

home inspectors for real estate marketing and inspection of home exteriors), land survey,

filming of special events, as well as operations in support of law enforcement and first

responder activities including crime scene reconstruction, traffic accidents, search and

rescue, and fire rescue and spotter

.

ProCore Drones

, in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements

of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

ProCore Drones has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

numerous exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition, ProCore Drones will be utilizing the s ame Leptron RDASS and Y uneec Q500

pr oven technologies the FAA has already accepted and approved for Exemption Nos.

11727, 11777, and 12086. All of the appropriate documentation to accompany ProCore

Drones Sec tion 333 Petition is included. Combined, th eir comp rehensive Section 333UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgrou p.com Exemption and the approvals the FAA has already given to their chosen products and th e

technology, should provide the support necessary to the FAA for a S ummary G rant of

ProCore Drone ’ s Section 333 Petition and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Bill Crozier

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Barings BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Lloyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ ERIC LLOYDEric LloydChief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2022
Report
      on
      Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria




Midland
      Loan Services, Inc. ("Midland"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The
      PNC
      Financial Services Group, Inc., is responsible for assessing compliance with
      the
      applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation AB") relating to its role in
      the
      servicing of commercial mortgage- backed
      securities transactions.




Midland
      has assessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and
      for
      the year
      ended December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, Midland used the criteria
      set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Item 1122(d)
      of
      Regulation AB. The transactions
      covered by this report include commercial mortgage-backed securities that were issued
      on
      or after January 1, 2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to
      the Securities
      Act of 1933 (the "Platform").




Based
      on
      such assessment, Midland believes that, as of and for the year ended, Midland
      has complied
      in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
      of Regulation
      AB relating to its role in the servicing of commercial mortgage-backed
      securities transactions,
      except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i) through (3)(iv),
      and 1122(d)(4)(xv),
      which Midland has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs
      with respect to the commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions being serviced
      (the "applicable servicing criteria").




Deloitte
      & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued
      an attestation
      report on Midland's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing
      criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.




MIDLAND
      LOAN SERVICES, INC.




/s/
              Steven W. Smith
            /s/
              Vincent E. Beckett
            /s/
              Bradley J. HaugerSteven
              W. Smith
            Vincent
              E. Beckett
            Bradley
              J. HaugerExecutive
              Vice President &
            Executive
              Vice President &
            Senior
              Vice PresidentChief
              Operating Officer
            Chief
              Administrative Officer
            Servicing
              Operations




Date:
      February 16, 2007




**A
      Member of the PNC Financial Services Group**


10851
      Mastin P.O. Box 25965 Shawnee Mission Kansas 66225-5965


www.midlandls.com
      913 253 9000**T** 913 253 9709 **F**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is required to develop recommendations regarding the modernization or realignment of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. This notice serves as documentation for the public record that the Secretary's recommendations to the Asset and Infrastructure Review (AIR) Commission have been submitted and are available to the public at                         *https://www.va.gov/​aircommissionreport.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Valerie Mattison Brown, Chief Strategy Officer, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7100.

      ( print page 14329)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Subtitle A of Title II of the Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-182), requires the Secretary to submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives and to the AIR Commission a report detailing recommendations for the modernization or realignment of VHA facilities developed utilizing the final criteria published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 28, 2021.                

## Signing Authority

Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on March 8, 2022, and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Michael P. Shores,

Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-05256 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, Jeffrey Sternberg, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2 of Trilliant Exploration Corporation for fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2
 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Trilliant Exploration Corporation.








Date: April
16, 2010





/s/  
      "Jeffrey Sternberg"Jeffrey
      Sternberg
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer





/s/  
      "Jeffrey Sternberg"Jeffrey
      Sternberg
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Trilliant Exploration Corporation and will
be retained by American Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Shawn DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden M. MCCALL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6101

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

Shawn Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

*181Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of its prior order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing D|avis’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### Milton N. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6852

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Milton N. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milton N. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as a motion to amend his first § 2254 petition and denying the motion. The order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata‘ble, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
|              (i)   | the      accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal      quarter ended April 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             (ii)  |  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                                                        |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:       June 9, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Michael L. Krall                                                                   |   |
|                          |   | Michael      L. KrallPresident      / Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive  Officer) |

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Victor Garcia Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered July 27, 2017, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Phyllis Chu, J.), rendered July 27, 2017, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Sworn police allegations that defendant was "behind the wheel" of a vehicle, while "the key was in the ignition [and] the engine was running," satisfied the operation element of the offense to which he pleaded guilty (<i>see People v Alamo</i>, 34 NY2d 453, 458-459 [1974]; <i>People v Almanzar</i>, 113 AD3d 527 [2014]<i>, lv denied </i>23 NY3d 1059 [2014]). </p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concurI concurI concur<br>Decision Date: November 19, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>