alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 021

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

ALONZO GONZALEZ

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 2 75th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices B enavides , and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the

Honorable Ren e Guerra, has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal pursuant to Rule

42.2 of the Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a). No

decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we GRANT the motion and DISMISS

the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing2

will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e

4th day of April , 20 13

.
H. R. 728 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7050 Highway 

BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, 

Jr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM B. WOODS, JR. POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William 

B. Woods, Jr. Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

                    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, that the Special Medical Advisory Group (the Committee) will meet on April 6, 2022, from 9:00 a.m. EDT to 3:30 p.m. EDT. The meeting is open to the public. The public will only be able to attend virtually. Members of the Committee may join in person or virtually. Join by phone: 1-404-397-1596, Access code 27620910241. Join via Webex (please contact POC below for assistance connecting):                     *https://veteransaffairs.webex.com/​veteransaffairs/​j.php?​MTID=​m8189db2dec142f2b5ac52cfcf9f302f8.*

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Veterans Health Administration.

On April 6, 2022, the agenda for the meeting will include discussions on Center for Care and Payment Innovation, H.R. National Green Alert Act of 2021, reinventing training and research at VA facilities, and VA's quality of care priorities, national leadership role and the post-pandemic way ahead.

                    Members of the public may submit written statements for review by the Committee to: Department of Veterans Affairs, Special Medical Advisory Group—Office of Under Secretary for Health (10), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420 or by email at                     *VASMAGDFO@va.gov.*                     Comments will be accepted until close of business on Monday, April 4, 2022.                

                    Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should email                     *VASMAGDFO@va.gov*                     or call 202-461-7000.                

Dated: March 10, 2022.

LaTonya L. Small,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-05461 Filed 3-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40058

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Quintil Cabanas-Castaneda, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:19-CR-1659-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Quintil CabanasCastaneda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cabanas-Castaneda has filed a response. We have 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 9, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40058 Document: 00515970160 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2021
No. 20-40058

2

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, as well as Cabanas-Castaneda’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-40058 Document: 00515970160 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2021
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos OREGON-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 15-50455

15-50456

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED SEPTEMBER 29, 2017

David P. Finn, Helen H. Hong, Nicole Ries Fox, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ellis M. Johnston, III, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Oregon-Mendoza appeals his bench-trial conviction and the 64-month sentence imposed for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the 24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Oregon-Mendoza contends that his prior conviction for assault with a deadly weapon under California Penal Code § 245(a)(1) is not a “crime of violence” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) or U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2014). He argues that, therefore, the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) and by applying a 16-level enhancement to his offense level. This argument is foreclosed. *See United States v. Grajeda,*581 F.3d 1186, 1190-91, 1197 (9th Cir. 2009) (violation of section 245(a)(1) “is categorically a crime of violence”). Contrary to Oregon-Mendoza’s contention, our decision in *Grajeda*is not “clearly irreconcilable” with *Descamps v. United States,*570 U.S. 254, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013). *See Miller v. Gammie,*335 F.3d 889, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Oregon-Mendoza next contends that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable. The sentence is not an abuse of *894discretion in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Oregon-Mendoza’s breach of the court’s trust. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Further, contrary to Oregon-Mendoza’s contention, the record reflects that the district court relied on only proper sentencing factors. *See United States v. Miqbel,*444 F.3d 1173, 1181-82 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00899]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9009]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Staging the Ukrainian Avant-Garde of the 1910s and 
1920s'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Staging the Ukrainian Avant-Garde of the 
1910s and 1920s,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or 
custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Ukrainian Museum, New York, NY, from on or about 
February 7, 2015, until on or about September 13, 2015, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
lists of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-00899 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6306 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 

numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2016 

Ms. GABBARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans 

from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mark Takai Filipino 

5 Veterans Family Unification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT. 

7 Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

10 ‘‘(F) Aliens who— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6306 IH

1 ‘‘(i) are eligible for a visa under paragraph 

2 (1) or (3) of section 203(a); and 

3 ‘‘(ii) have a parent (regardless of whether 

4 the parent is living or dead) who was natural5 ized pursuant to— 

6 ‘‘(I) section 405 of the Immigration 

7 Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–649; 8 

8 U.S.C. 1440 note); or 

9 ‘‘(II) title III of the Act of October 

10 14, 1940 (54 Stat. 1137, chapter 876), as 

11 added by section 1001 of the Second War 

12 Powers Act, 1942 (56 Stat. 182, chapter 

13 199).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gadi Cunia, Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 27, 2012                                      
|                                                           
|/s/ Gadi Cunia                                             
|Gadi Cunia                                                 
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 630 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 630

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
  rules regarding basis adjustments to stock of S corporations making 
                 charitable contributions of property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2015

Mr. Reichert (for himself and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent certain 
  rules regarding basis adjustments to stock of S corporations making 
                 charitable contributions of property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RULE REGARDING BASIS ADJUSTMENT TO STOCK OF S 
              CORPORATIONS MAKING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1367(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking the last sentence.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to contributions made in taxable years beginning after December 31, 
2014.
                                 <all>
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 19

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative

to limiting congressional terms.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 17 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. BROWN introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States relative to limiting congressional terms.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years from the date of its submission

9 by the Congress:
2

•SJ 19 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. No person shall be elected to three con3 secutive terms in the Senate. No person shall be elected

4 to seven consecutive terms in the House of Representa5 tives.

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. Election or appointment to a partial

7 term shall not count against the limitations of section 1.

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. This article shall apply to elections fol9 lowing the date of ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
#### David Wayne WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael SMITH; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-15179

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 **

Filed November 20, 2017

David Wayne Wilson, San Diego, CA, pro se.

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM *

California state prisoner David Wayne Wilson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the filing fee, after the district court denied him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), *Andrews v. Cervantes,*493 F.3d 1047, 1052 (9th Cir. 2007), and for an abuse of discretion its denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, *O’Loughlin v. Doe,*920 F.2d 614, 616 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Wilson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because at least three of Wilson’s prior federal actions were dismissed for failure to state a claim, and Wilson failed to allege plausibly that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time that he lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); *see also Andrews,*493 F.3d at 1055 (an exception to the three-strikes rule exists only where “the complaint makes a plausible allegation that the prisoner faced ‘imminent danger of serious physical injury’ at the time of filing”).

Wilson’s motions (Docket Entry Nos. 7, 9 & 11) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

*

. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Depositor: Structured
        Asset Securities Corporation
 745
        Seventh Avenue , 8th
        Floor
 New
        York , NY
        10019
 
 
 Trustee:  LaSalle
        Bank , N.A.
 135
        S.
        LaSalle Street , Suite
        1625
 Chicago , IL
        60603
 Attention:
        Global Securities and Trust Services
 
 Securities
        Administrator:
 
  Subject: Annual
        Officer's Certification
 Fiscal
        Year: 2006
 Securitization: LXS
        2006-19
 
 I,
        E.
        Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
        Services LLC (the “Master Servicer”), do certify the following for the Calendar
        Year 2006:
  1.
        A
        review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding calendar
        year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement for
        such
        period has been made under my supervision.
  2.
        To the
        best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
        all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout
        2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been a failure to
        fulfill
        any such obligation in any material respect, I have specifically identified
        to
        the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure known to me and the nature
        and
        status thereof, including the steps being taken by the Master Servicer to
        remedy
        such default.
 
 Certified
        by:  AURORA
        LOAN SERVICES LLC
 
 
  By:
        /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
 
 Name: 
        E. Todd Whittemore
 Title: 
        Executive Vice President
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

p0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

142387

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142387 COA: 300667 Wayne CC: 10-002234-FC EUGENE LANARD PEGUIES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.