alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 84 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 84

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 1996

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46, United 
States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. 
App. 883), the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER, 
hull identification number 3121125, and State of Hawaii registration 
number HA1809E.

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
S. Con. Res. 20 Agreed to June 30, 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, June 29, 1995, or Friday, June 30, 1995,

pursuant to a motion made by the Majority Leader or his designee,

in accordance with this resolution, it stand recessed or adjourned

until 12:00 noon on Monday, July 10, 1995, or until such time

on that day as may be specified by the Majority Leader or his

designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until 12:00 noon

on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this resolution, whichever occurs first; and

that when the House of Representatives adjourns on the legislative

day of Friday, June 30, 1995, it stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m.

on Monday, July 10, 1995, or until 12:00 noon on the second

day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 of this resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and the House, respectively,
S. Con. Res. 20—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 997 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 997

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  exclusion for amounts received under qualified group legal services 
                                 plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 29 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

  Mr. D'Amato introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  exclusion for amounts received under qualified group legal services 
                                 plans.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER 
              QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL SERVICES PLANS.

    (a) General Rule.--Section 120 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to amounts received under qualified group legal services 
plans) is amended by striking subsection (e) and by redesignating 
subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2012-28919]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 744

[Docket No. 121009527-2527-01]
RIN 0694-AF80

Addition of Certain Persons to the Entity List

Correction

    In rule document 2012-28919 appearing on pages 71097-71099 in the 
issue of Thursday, November 29, 2012, make the following changes:

PART 744--[CORRECTED]

    1. On page 71099, in the table ``Supplement No. 4 to Part 744--
Entity List'', in the fifth column, in the fourth row, ``77 FR [INSERT 
FR PAGE NUMBER] 11/30/12.'' should read, ``77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE 
NUMBER] 11/29/12.''
    2. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in the 
sixth row, ``77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 11/30/12.'' should read, 
``77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 11/29/12.''
    3. On the same page, in the same table, in the same column, in the 
tenth row, ``77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 11/30/12.'' should read, 
``77 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER] 11/29/12.''

[FR Doc. C1-2012-28919 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
June 27, 2012

Meeting with Hector Ybanez, Holcim Cement

Attendees:

Sharon Nizich, US EPA

Keith Barnett, US EPA

Hector Ybanez, Holcim Cement

Michael Laney, RTI

A meeting was held today to discuss the NESHAP Portland Cement Reconsideration proposal. 

Discussion was on the revisions to several PM monitoring and recordkeeping items, in the 

proposal, as posted at the following link:

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t3/fr_notices/portcem_nsps_neshap_prop_062212.pdf
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 1996

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To express the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture should dispose of all remaining commodities in

the disaster reserve maintained under the Agricultural

Act of 1970 to relieve the distress of livestock producers

whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely affected

by disaster conditions existing in certain areas of the

United States, such as prolonged drought or flooding,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. USE OF DISASTER RESERVE FOR ASSISTANCE

4 TO LIVESTOCK PRODUCERS.

5 In light of the prolonged drought and other adverse

6 weather conditions existing in certain areas of the United

7 States, the Secretary of Agriculture should promptly dis8 pose of all commodities in the disaster reserve maintained
2

•SCON 63 RFH

1 under section 813 of the Agricultural Act of 1970 (7

2 U.S.C. 1427a) to relieve the distress of livestock producers

3 whose ability to maintain livestock is adversely affected

4 by disaster conditions, such as prolonged drought or flood5 ing.

Passed the Senate June 5, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Fortress Investment Group LLC (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Daniel N. Bass, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Daniel N. Bass     
|Daniel N. Bass         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 1, 2010          

This certification accompanies the Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

End of Filing
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 102

    To express the sense of the Senate concerning Pakistan and the 
               impending visit of Prime Minister Bhutto.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 4 (legislative day, March 27), 1995

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Helms, and 
Mr. Pell) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To express the sense of the Senate concerning Pakistan and the 
               impending visit of Prime Minister Bhutto.

Whereas Pakistan and the United States have been allies since 1947, and 
        throughout the difficult days of the Cold War;
Whereas Pakistan was a front-line state against Soviet totalitarian expansionism 
        and worked with the United States to successfully end the Soviet 
        occupation of Afghanistan;
Whereas Pakistan has been in the forefront of United Nations peacekeeping 
        operations, recently being the largest contributor of forces to United 
        Nations peacekeeping operations;
Whereas Pakistan has cooperated with the United States in the apprehension and 
        swift extradition of Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, the alleged mastermind of the 
        terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York City;
Whereas Pakistan's economy is being increasingly liberalized and opened to 
        outside investors and businesses;
Whereas there are increasing opportunities for economic cooperation between 
        Pakistan and the United States as a result of private sector agreements 
        for investment in Pakistan's energy sector and other pending agreements; 
        and
Whereas Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who has worked to strengthen Pakistan's 
        close relationship with the United States, was reelected to office in 
        October, 1993, and is scheduled to visit the United States on an 
        official visit in April: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate--
            (1) welcomes the visit of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto to 
        the United States as a sign of the warm, enduring friendship 
        between the United States and Pakistan; and
            (2) pledges to work with the Government of Pakistan to 
        strengthen the United States-Pakistan relationship in the years 
        ahead.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 869 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 869

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 26 (legislative day, May 15), 1995

  Mr. Chafee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, United States official 
number 646512.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         120,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         221,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 569,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        371,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   569,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,044
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,146)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.49)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

**We hereby consent to the inclusionof our Independent Auditors’ Report dated March 27, 2009 regarding thestatements of financial condition of 1**st PacificBancorp and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the relatedstatement of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows forthe three years ended December 31, 2008 in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

/s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY &CO., LLP

 

Laguna Hills, California

March 27, 2009

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Trent B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Trent B. Troyer
----------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FFD Financial Corporation and will be retained by FFD Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
..
### ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY EVALUATION

Regulatory Evaluation Form , Revision 2
. 5 Page 1 of 1 1/15/10 

### AD Title: PW4074/PW4077 15th Stage HPC Disk Cracking Docket No. FAA
- 2010
- 1095 Directorate Identifier: 2009
- NE
- 40
- AD **Costs:** Costs per **Product** (e.g., engine, propeller) Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) W ork
h ours Labor cost ( @ $8 5 /hour) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U
. S
. Fleet Replacement Disk 0. 0 $ 0.00 $66, 000 $ 66,000.00 44 $ 2,904,000 $ 255.00 $0 $ 255.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0



### Total Cost s of compliance for U
. S
. fleet: $ 2,904,000



### Costs covered under warranty **Special considerations for Econom**  **ic Analysis :**  . Disks will be remove d at 12,000 cycles, and the life limit of the disk is 20,000 cycles. The prorated cost of the disk is 12,000/20,000 = 0.6 of the new part cost. Replacement Disk Cost for AD = $110,000 (new part cost) x 0.6 x 44 parts = $2,904,000
. Based on the fleet distr ibution, the majority of the US fleet will be removed at 12,000, and will not require an inspection. 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES explain below NO
**DOT R egulatory Policies and Procedures:**  Is the AD significant? YES explain below NO **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES explain below NO
**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of trans portation? YES explain below NO 

### Explanation:
#### John Patrick FLETCHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jason LENGERICH, BVCF Warden; The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 17-1288

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed November 13, 2017

(D.C. No. 1:17-CV-01022-LTB) (D. Colorado)

John Patrick Fletcher, Pro Se

Christine Cates Brady, Esq., Office of the Attorney General for the State of Colorado, Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center, Denver, CO, for Respondents-Ap-pellees

Before LUCERO, BALDOCK, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Bobby R. Baldock, United States Circuit Judge

Petitioner John Patrick Fletcher, a Colorado state prisoner appearing pro se, *796seeks a certifícate of appealability (OOA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). In a written order, the district court denied .the motion as time-barred under § 2244(d)(1). Because Petitioner has not shown “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling,” we summarily deny Petitioner a COA and dismiss his .appeal. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

We need not detail Petitioner’s arguments challenging application of § 2244(d)(l)’s one-year limitation period to his petition. Suffice to say we have carefully reviewed his “Combined Opening Brief and Application for a Certificate of Appeal-ability,” the record on appeal, and the district court’s written order denying his petition as time-barred. Based on our review, we conclude the district court accurately analyzed the statute of limitations issue and properly dismissed the petition. Where -the district court accurately analyzes an issue and articulates a cogent rationale, we see no useful purpose in writing at length. Thus, we reject Petitioner’s 'argument that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is timely substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s written order which ably explains why Petitioner is not entitled to- a COA. '

COA DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. Motion for IFP DENIED as moot

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CESAR MASCORRO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50554

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00410-JAH-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, 

Circuit Judges.

1. Mascorro’s own admission of his prior bad act provides sufficient proof

under Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681, 690 (1988), for admission of the

prior bad act into evidence. Admitting the evidence didn’t violate Federal Rule of

Evidence 404(b) because the prior bad act indicated both Mascorro’s knowledge

FILED

FEB 02 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
page 2

that his passengers were in the United States unlawfully and his purpose to help

them remain. See United States v. Longoria, 624 F.2d 66, 69 (9th Cir. 1980). The

district court didn’t abuse its discretion in finding that the prejudicial effect of

admitting the prior bad act didn’t substantially outweigh its probative value. See

United States v. Ramirez-Jiminez, 967 F.2d 1321, 1327 (9th Cir. 1992).

2. The grand jury instructions Mascorro challenges are indistinguishable

from those we’ve previously held not to be constitutionally defective. See United

States v. Caruto, 663 F.3d 394, 398–99 (9th Cir. 2011); United States v. CortezRivera, 454 F.3d 1038, 1040–41 (9th Cir. 2006); United States v. Navarro-Vargas,

408 F.3d 1184, 1187 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.