# TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR 2002 MANE **- VU** 

**SIP MODELING INVENTORIES, VERSION 3** 

Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 3622 Lyckan Parkway, Suite 2005 Durham, NC 2770 7
November 20, 2006 for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE -VU)

## [This page intentionally left blank.]

## iii **CONTENTS** TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ vi FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... viii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................ ................................ ...................... ix CHAPTER I

– IN TRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 1 A. What is the purpose of this TSD? ................................ ................................ ....................... 1 B. What are Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE - VU Inventory? ................................ .... 2 C. How is this TSD organized? ................................ ................................ ............................... 3 CHAPTER II

– POINT SOURCES ................................ ................................ ................................ 4 A. General Methods for all State and Local Agencies ................................ ............................ 4 1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................ ................................ ................... 4 2. What Quality

Assurance Steps Were Performed? ................................ ........................ 5 3. Version 3 Emissions Summary ................................ ................................ ................... 18 B. State - Specific Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 20 1. Connecticut ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 20 2. Delaware ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 21 3. District of Columbia ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 21 4. Maine ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 22 5. Maryland ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 22 6. Massachusetts ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 23 7. New Hampshire ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 23 8. New Jersey ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 24 9. New York ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 24 10. Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties) .................... 25 11. Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003) ................................ ................. 27 12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42101) ................................ ............. 28 13. Rhode I sland ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 28 14. Vermont ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 30 C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Vers ions? ................................ .................. 30 CHAPTER III

– AREA SOURCES ................................ ................................ ............................. 32 A. General Methods for all States ................................ ................................ .......................... 32 1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................ ................................ ................. 32 2. What Quality

Assurance Steps Were Performed? ................................ ...................... 34 3. Version 3 Revisions ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 53 4. Version 3 Emissions Summary ................................ ................................ ................... 57 B. State - Specific Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 58 1. C onnecticut ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 58 2. Delaware ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 59 3. District of Columbia ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 60 4. Maine ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 60 5. Maryland ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 61 6. Massachusetts ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 62 7. New Hampshire ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 63 8. New Jersey ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 65 9. New York ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 65 10. Pennsylvania ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 70 11. Rhode I sland ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 71

## iv

12. Vermont ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 72 C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions? ................................ .................. 73 CHAPTER IV

– NONROAD SOURCES ................................ ................................ .................... 75 A. General Methods for all States ................................ ................................ .......................... 75 1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................ ................................ ................. 75 2. What Quality

Assurance Steps Were Performed? ................................ ...................... 79 3. Version 3 Emission Summaries ................................ ................................ .................. 82 B. State - Specific Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 84 1. Connecticut ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 84 2. Del aware ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 84 3. District of Columbia ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 85 4. Maine ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 86 5. Maryland ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 87 6. Massachusetts ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 88 7. New Hampshire ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 89 8. New Jersey ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 89 9. New York ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 90 10. Pennsylvania ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 91 11. Rhode I sland ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 92 12. Vermont ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 93 CHAPTER V

– ONROAD SOURCES ................................ ................................ ........................ 94 A. General Methods for All States ................................ ................................ ......................... 94 1. Data Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 94 2. What Quality

Assurance Steps were Performed? ................................ ....................... 95 3. Version 3 Emission Summaries ................................ ................................ .................. 96 B. State - Specific Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 97 1. Connecticut ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 97 2. Delaware ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 99 3. District of Columbia ................................ ................................ ................................ . 100 4. Maine ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 102 5. Maryland ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 103 6. Massachusetts ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 105 7. New Hampshire ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 106 8. New Jersey ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 108 9. New York ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 110 10. Pennsylvania ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 111 11. Rhode I sland ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 113 12. Vermont ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 114 CHAPTER VI

– BIOGENIC SOURCES ................................ ................................ ................... 117 A. General Methods for all States ................................ ................................ ........................ 117 1. What Data Sources Were Used? ................................ ................................ ............... 117 2. Version 3 Emissions Summary ................................ ................................ ................. 118 B. State - Specific Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 118 CHAPTER VII. TEMPORAL , SPECIATION, AND SPATIAL ALLOCATION PROFILES AND PREPARATION OF SMOKE (IDA) AND RPO DATA EXCHANGE PROTOCOL(NIF 3.0) FORMATS ................................ ................................ ............... 119 A. Temporal Profiles ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 119 1. Point and Area Sources ................................ ................................ ............................. 119

## v

2. Nonroad Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 120 3. Onroad Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 120 B. Speciation Profiles ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 121 1. Point and Area Sources ................................ ................................ ............................. 121 2. Nonroad Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 121 3. Onroad Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 121 C. Spatial Allocation Profiles ................................ ................................ .............................. 122 D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats .. 122 CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE MANE -VU REGION ..... 155 CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ........................... 157 APPENDIX A - POINT SOURCE I NVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMI SSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................A - 1 APPENDIX B - AREA SOURCE I NVENTORY, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMI SSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT....................................................................B - 1 APPENDIX C - NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3: FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (NM IM ) INPUTS TEMPORAL PROFILES FOR POINT AND AREA SOURCES............... .....................................................C - 1

## vi

**TABLES** Table II - 1. Description of the Field Names and Descriptions for the SCC Control Device Ratios Table ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 14 Table II - 2. Version 3 2002 MANE -VU Point Source Emissions by State ................................ .. 19 Table II - 3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 20 Table II - 4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 21 Table II - 5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pe ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 21 Table II - 6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 22 Table II - 7. Maryland 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 22 Table II - 8. Massachusetts 2002 Point, Version 3: Uni que List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 23 Table II - 9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 23 Table II - 10. New Jersey

2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 24 Table II - 11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pe ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 25 Table II - 12. Penns ylvania 2002 Po int, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 26 Table II - 13. Penns ylvania - Allegheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ......................... 27 Table II - 14. Penns ylvania - Philadelphia County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique Li st of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................ 28 Table II - 15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 30 Table II - 16. Vermont 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 30 Table III - 1. Summary

of MANE -VU - Sponsored Inventories Included in Version 1 of the Area Source Consolidated Emissions Inventory ................................ ................................ ....... 41 Table III - 2. Area Source Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel Combustion Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10 - PRI/FIL, PM25 - PRI/FIL, and PM - CON ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 44 Table III - 3. SCCs for which PM25 - PRIEmissions were Estimated b y Applying a Ratio to the PM10 - PRIEmissions in the State inventory ................................ ................................ .... 49 Table III - 4. Revisions to PM25 - PRIand PM25 - FIL Emissions for Paved and Unpaved Roads and Construction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 56 Table III - 5. Version 3 2002 MANE -VU Area Source Emissions by State ................................ . 57 Table III - 6. Connecticut 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 58 Table III - 7. Delaware 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 59

## vii

Table III - 8. District of Columbia 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 60 Table III - 9. Maine 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 60 Table III - 10. Maryland 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 61 Table III - 11. Massachusetts 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 62 Table III - 12. New Hampshire 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 64 Table III - 13. New Jersey 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 65 Table III - 14. New York 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 66 Table III - 1 5. Summary

of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MANE - VU's Area Source Inventory ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 68 Table III - 16. Penns ylvania 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 70 Table III - 17. Rhode Island 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty

pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 71 Table III - 18. Vermont 2002 Area, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pes ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 72 T able IV - 1. List of Unique Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by States in MANE -VU Inventory ................................ ................................ ........................ 76 Table IV - 2. Summary

of Basis for 2002 MANE - VU Aircraft, Commercial Marine , and Locomotive Inventory ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 77 Table IV - 3. Data Source Code Descriptions ................................ ................................ ................ 82 Table IV - 4. Annual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions by MANE -VU State ................................ 82 Table IV - 5. Annual 2002 NONROAD2005 Model Emissions by MANE - VU State ................. 83 Table IV - 6. Annual 2002 Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Emissions by MANE -VU State ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 83 Table IV - 7. Delaware NONROAD External Data Files ................................ ............................... 85 Table IV - 8. M aryl and NONROAD External Data Files ................................ ............................. 87 Table V- 1. Annual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by MANE -VU State ................................ ... 97 Table V- 2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ..................... 98 Table V- 3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ....................... 100 Table V- 4. District of Columbi a Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ..... 101 Table V- 5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ............................ 102 Table V- 6. Maryland Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ....................... 104 Table V- 7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ............... 105 Table V- 8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ............ 107 Table V- 9. New Jersey

Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ .................... 108 Table V- 10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ................... 110 Table V- 11. Penns ylvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ............... 112 Table V- 12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ............... 113 Table V- 13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files ................................ ...................... 115 Table VI - 1. Version 3 2002 MANE -VU Biogenic Source Emissions by State ........................ 118

## viii

Table VII - 1. Profiles, Cross -references, and Documentation for Model Inputs for Version 3 of 2002 MANE -VU Inventory ................................ ................................ ............................ 123 Table VII - 2. Point Source Temporal Cross - reference Additions ................................ .............. 126 Table VII - 3. Unknown SCCs in the MANE -VU Point Source Inventory ................................ .. 130 Table VII - 4. Area Source Temporal Cross - Reference Updates ................................ ................ 131 Table VII - 5. Area Source Temporal Cross - Reference Additions ................................ .............. 136 Table VII - 6. Area Source Temporal Cross - Reference and Profile Additions for the MANE - VU Inventory ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 141 Table VII - 7. Point Source Speciation Profiles Added to Speciation Cross -reference File for CB IVwith PM Mechanism ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 151 Table VII - 8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile Assignments for CB - IVwith PM Mechanism ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 152 Table VII - 9. Summary

of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files ....................... 153 Table VII - 10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Ty pe Combinations for Daily Emissions in the MANE -VU 2002 Point and Area Source Inventories, Version 3 ....... 154 Table VIII - 1. Description of Non- MANE -VU Regi on Inventory Data Used for MANE - VU BaseB Modeling ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 156 Table C - 1. MANE - VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONROAD Inputs ................................ ...... C - 2

**FI GURES**  Figure 1. MANE -VU 12 - Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain ................................ ................... 2 Figure VIII - 1. MANE - VU 12 - Kilometer CMAQ Modeling Domain ................................ ........ 155

## ix

**ACRONYMS AND AB BREVIATIONS**  ATP Anaerobic Thermal Processor BEIS Biogenic Emissions Inventory S ystem CAA Clean Air Act CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule CAMD Clean Air Markets Division CAP criteria air pollutant CE Control Equipment (NIF 3.0) table CEM Continuous Emissions Monitoring CENRAP Central Regional Air Planning Organization CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule CMU Carnegie Mellon University CNG compressed natural gas CO carbon monoxide CO 2 

## carbon dioxide EF emission factor EFIG Emi ssion Factors and Inventory Group EGU electricity generating unit EI inventory EM Emission (NIF 3.0) table EP Emission Process (NIF 3.0) table EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ERP Emission Release Point (NIF 3.0) table ETBE ethyl terti ary butylether ETOH ethanol ETS Emission Tracking S ystem EU Emission Unit (NIF 3.0) table FIPS Federal Information Processing Standard FIRE Factor Information and REtrieval Factor GI S geographic information system GSE ground support equipment HAP hazardous air pollutant HC hydrocarbon HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System ID identification ID A Inventory Data Analyz er format I/M inspection and maintenance km kilometer LA I leaf area indices LEV low emission vehicle LPG li quified petroleum gas MACT maximum achievable control technology MANE -VU Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union MARAMA Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association MTBE methyl tertiary butyl ether NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NAICS North American Industrial Classification System

## x

NEI National Emissions Inventory NH 3 

## ammonia NIF NEI Input Format NMIM National Mobile Inventory Model NO nitrous oxide NO x 

## oxides of nitrogen NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ORI S Office of Regulatory Information Systems OTC Ozone Transport Commission PAR photosy nthetic active radiation PE Emission Period (NIF 3.0) table Pechan E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. PFC portable fuel container PM particulate matter PM - CON condensible PM PM 10 

## particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a

nominal 10 micrometers PM10 - FIL filterable PM 10 

## PM10 - PRI primary PM 10 

## PM 2.5 

## particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a

nominal 2.5 micrometers PM25 - FIL filterable PM 2.5 

## PM25 - PRI primary PM 2.5 

## POTWs public owned treatment works ppm parts per million psi pounds per square inch QA quality

assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan RPO Regional Planning Organization RVP Reid vapor pressure SCC Source Classification Code SPDPRO speed profile SPDREF speed cross reference SI Site (NIF 3.0) table SIC Standard Industrial Classification SIP State Implementation Plan S/L State and Local SMOKE Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SO 2 

## sulfur dioxide TAME tertiary amylmethyl ether TR Transmittal (NIF 3.0) table TSD technical support document U.S. United States VI STAS Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compound WRAP Western Regional Air Partnership

## 1

**CHAPTER I**
**– INTRODUCTION**  **A. What is the purpose of this TSD?**  This technical support document (TSD) explains the data sources, methods, and results for preparing Version 3 of the 2002 base year criteria air pollutant (CAP) and ammonia (NH 3 

## ) emissions inventories for point, area, onroad, nonroad, and biogenic sources for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE - VU) Regional Planning Organization (RPO). The MANE -VU region includes Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Penns ylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Local air planning agencies include Philadelphia and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The region also includes the Penobscot Tribe of Maine Indian Nation (Tribal code 018) and the St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York (Tribal code 007). However, these tribal authorities did not provide any data for the 2002 MANE -VU inventory . MANE -VU will use these inventories to support air quality modeling, State Implementation Plan (SIP) development, and implementation activities for the regional haze rule and fine particulate matter (PM) and ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The inventories and supporting data prepared include the following: (1) Comprehensive, county- level, mass emissions and modeling inventories for of 2002 emissions for CAPs and NH 3 

## for the State and Local (S/L) agencies included in the MANE -VU region; (2) The temporal, speciation, and spatial allocation profiles for the MANE -VU region inventories; (3) Inventories for wildfires, prescribed burning, and agricultural field burning for the southeastern provinces of Canada ; and (4) Inventories for other RP Os, Canada, and Mexico. The mass emissions inventory files were prepared in the National Emissions Inventory (NE I) Input Format Version 3.0 (NIF 3.0). The modeling inventory files were prepared in Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions/Inventory Data Analyz er (SMOKE/IDA) format. Ancillary files (holding spatial, temporal, and speciation profile data) were prepared in SMOKE/IDA compatible format. Figure 1 shows the Models - 3 Community Multiscale Air Quality

Modeling System (CMAQ) modeling domain for the MANE -VU region. The inventories include annual emissions for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

## ), oxides of nitrogen (NO x

## ), volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbon monoxide (CO), NH 3 

## , and particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 and 2 .5 micrometers (i.e., primary PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## ). The inventories included summer day, winter day, and average day emissions. However, not all agencies included daily emissions in their inventories, and, for the agencies that did, the temporal basis for the daily emissions varied between agencies. The temporal profiles prepared for this project will be used to calculate daily emissions when not available in the inventory files.

## 2 **Figure 1. MA NE**  **- VU 12**  **- Kilometer CMA** **Q Modeling Domain**

**B. What are Versions**  **1, 2, and 3 of the 2002 MANE -** **VU Inventory?** Work on Version 1 of the 2002 MANE -VU inventory began in April 2004. The consolidated inventory for point, area, onroad, and nonroad sources was prepared by starting with the inventories that S/Lagencies submitted to the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from May through July of 2004 as a requirement of the Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). The EPA’s format and content quality assurance (QA) programs (and other QA checks not included in EPA’s QA software) were run on each inventory to identify format and/or data content issues (EPA, 2004a). E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. (Pechan) worked with the MANE - VU S/Lagencies and the staff of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management A ssociation (MARAMA) to resolve QA issues and augment the inventories to fill data gaps in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for this project (MANE -VU, 2004a). MARAMA is the MANE -VU organization’s employees, whereas

## 3

MANE -VU is the member S/Lagencies plus MARAMA employees. MARAMA is one of three RPOs (in addition to Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) and North East States for Coordinated Air Use Management) supporting the MANE -VU effort. A draft of the point and area source inventories and summary files were provided for stakeholder review during August 2004. Stakeholder comments were reviewed b y the S/Lagencies and revisions to the inventory files were made to the files to incorporate stakeholder comments as approved b y e ach S/L agency . The inventories were finalized during December 2004 and the SMOKE input files were prepared and reviewed by the modelers during December 2004 and early J anuary

2005. The final inventory and SMOKE input files were finalized during January 2005. Work on Version 2 (covering the period from April through September 2005) involved incorporating revisions requested b y some S/Lagencies on the point, area, and onroad inventories. Work on Version 3 (covering the period from December 2005 through April 2006) included additional revisions to the point, area, and onroad inventories as requested b y some states. Thus, the Version 3 inventory for point, area, and onroad sources were built upon Versions 1 and 2. This work also included development of the biogenics inventory . Version 3 of the nonroad inventory

was completely redone due to changes that EPA made to the NONROAD2005 model. **C. How is this TSD organized?**  Chapters II through V of this TSD present the general and State - specific methods and data sources used to develop Version 3 of MANE -VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. Chapter VI presents the methods, data sources, and model used to develop the biogenics inventory . Chapter VII documents the temporal alloc ation, speciation, and spatial allocation modeling input files used for Version 3 of MANE -VU’s 2002 inventory for all sectors. Chapter VIII describes the non- MANE - VU region inventory data used for MANE -VU BaseB Modeling. References for the TSD are provided in Chapter IX. Appendices A and B provide the QA Summary

Report files prepared during development of the State - specific inventories for point and area sources, respectively . Appendices A and B also provide tables that identify for each S/L agency, the Version 3 data sources, emission ty pe period, pollutant, and the number of counties by

source classification code (SCC). For the nonroad inventory, Appendix C provides the final county, monthly National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) inputs provided or confirmed b y the States for Reid vapor pressure (RVP), weight percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur.

## 4

**CHAPTER II** – **POINT SOURCES A.**  **General Methods for all State and Local Agencies 1.**  **What Data Sources Were Used?** Version 3 of the 2002 MANE -VU point source inventory is based primarily

on Version 1 with some state - specific revisions incorporated into Versions 2 and 3. Version 1 was developed using the inventories that S/Lagencies submitted to EPA from May through July

of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. All 12 State agencies submitted point source inventories to EPA. In addition, Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania each submitted their own point source inventories to EPA. The EPA performed some limited QA review of the S/L inventories to identify

format, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA revised the inventories to address these issues and made the files available to the S/L agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory

files were used as the starting point for Version 1 of the MANE -VU inventory . These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, revised (as approved b y the MANE -VU S/Lagencies) to address QA issues and to fill data gaps identified while preparing Version 1. Subsequently, the following agencies provided revisions to their point source inventories:

 Version 2

– Connecticut, Delaware, and Maryland

 Version 3

– Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode I sland The revisions that these states provided for Versions 2 and 3 are discussed in the “State - Specific Methods” section of this chapter. In order to track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields were added to the Transmittal (TR), Site (SI), Emission Unit (EU), Emission Release Point (ER), Emission Process (EP), Emission Period (PE), Emission (EM), and Control Equipment (CE) tables:

 Data Source Codes: **Code Description**  S State agency- supplied data. L Local agency- supplied data to incorporate S/Lcomments for individual

records. P NH 3 

## emissions from MANE -VU inventory for cement kilns. AUG -A PM Augmentation: ad-hoc change. AUG - C PM Augmentation: standard augmentation method. AUG - O PM Augmentation: set PMxx - FIL = PMxx - PRIfor SCCs starting with

10 (external fuel combustion) and 20 (internal fuel combustion). Note: emission factors and particle - size data for estimating condensible emissions for fuel combustion SCCs starting with 30 were not available; therefore, condensible emissions were not estimated for these processes

## 5 if an agency

provided filterable and not primary emissions for these processes. In other words, the primary emissions were assumed to equal the filterable emissions. AUG - Z PM Augmentation: automated fill - in of zero values where all PM for a

particular process is zero.

 Revision Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision was made to a record.

 State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS): This field indicates the state FIPS code of the submittal.

 County

FIPS: This field indicates the county F IP S code of the submittal. The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table:

 Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the values of the emissions in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis.

 Emission Ty

pe Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type

– either ANNUAL or NONANNUAL. This field was used to prepare summari es of annual emissions.

 CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP versus records for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). For the MANE -VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records.

 Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002. Note that the QAPP for Version 1 includes more data source codes than were used in Version 3 of the point source inventory . The data source codes listed above are the codes used in Version 3. The exception is for Rhode Island, who requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with its inventory included in the final 2002 NEI prepared b y EPA. Thus, for Rhode Island, it was agreed to maintain the data source codes used in the NEI in Version 3 of the MANE -VU inventory . The data source codes for Rhode I sland’s point source inventory are explained under the state - specific section for Rhode Island.

**2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?**  A QAPP was prepared and approved b y MANE - VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (MANE - VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of all three versions of the inventory . This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory. The QA process for each S/L inventory

involved the following steps:

 Conduct QA checks on each S/Linventory;  Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the agency for review;

## 6

 Revise the inventory

to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency;  Repeat the QA che cks on the revised inventory to verify that the corrections were completed;  Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; and  Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augmentation was completed correctly . **a. QA checks for S/L agency inventories**  The f ollowing discusses the QA diagnoses that were run on the consolidated point source inventory data set. For each S/Lagency, a “QA Summary Report” was prepared for each QA check in an Excel Workbook file. The results of each QA check was summarized in a s eparate spreadsheet and submitted to the S/Lagency for review and resolution. The agencies provided corrections to the data in the Excel files or via e -mail and the inventory was updated with the corrections. i. Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) A nalysis The goal of this analys is was to compare annual NO x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions that were measured with CEM systems and reported to EPA to the annual NO x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions reported in the S/L inventories. Facilities report hourly CEM data to EPA for units that are subject to CEM reporting requirements of the NO x 

## SIP Call rule and Title IV of the Clean Air Act (CAA). Thus, hourly CEM emissions were summed to the annual level and compared to the annual emissions in the S/Linventories. If the S/Lagencies agreed, the CEM hourly emissions would be used to support air quality

modeling to accurately

reflect the temporal distribution of emissions from CEM units during 2002. Since some of the states require facilities to certify the emissions they report for inc lusion in the inventory, the agencies needed proof that the emissions in the CEM inventory compared well with the emissions in the S/Linventory . The 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly NO x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions and heat input data were downloaded from the EPA/Clean Air Markets Division’s (CAMD) web site (www.epa.gov/airmarkets ) on July 8, 2004 (CAMD, 2004). The data were provided by quarter and state resulting in 48 separate files for the 12 states in the MANE -VU region. For each state, the hourly

emissions were summed to the annual level by facility and EU. The first stage in the CEM analysis involved preparing a crosswalk file to match facilities and units in the CEM inventory to facilities and units in the S/Linventories. In the CEM inventory, the Office of Regulatory

Information Systems (ORI S) identification (ID) code identifies unique facilities and the unit ID identifies unique boilers and internal combustion engines (i.e., turbines and reciprocating engines). In the S/Linventories, the state and county FIPS and state facility ID together identify

unique facilities and the EU ID identifies unique boilers or internal combustion engines. However, in some of the S/Linventories, the emissions for multiple EUs were summed and reported under the same EU ID. Thus, an Excel Workbook was sent to the S/Lagencies that contained an initial crosswalk with the ORI S ID and unit ID in the CEM inventory matched to the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and EU ID in the S/Linventory . Agencies were asked to confirm/correct/supplement the information in the crosswalk. The initial crosswalk also contained annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions and flags that indicated if

## 7

CEM units were subject to reporting requirements under the NO x 

## SIP Call and/or Title IV of the CAA. It should be noted that the initial matching of the IDs in both inventories was based on previous crosswalks that had been developed for the 1999 NEI and in -house information c ompiled by

Pechan. The matching at the facility level was nearly complete; however, S/L agency assistance was needed to match most of CEM units to EUs in the S/Linventories. The crosswalk was updated with corrections to facility and CEM unit-to - EU matches, and with new matches provided by the S/L agencies. The matching of each CEM unit to an EU was still incomplete. Consequently, the comparison of annual emissions was performed at the facility level. The second stage in the CEM analysis was to prepare an Excel Workbook file for each S/L agency that compared the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM inventory to the annual emissions reported in the S/Linventory . The file included three spreadsheets that compared annual emissions at the facility level, listed the facilities in the CEM inventory that could not be matched to the facilities in the S/L inventory, and listed the facilities in the S/L inventory identified as an electricity generating unit (EGU) that could not be matched to a facility in the CEM inventory . The Excel files were sent to the S/Lagencies for review. The S/L agencies then indicated if they did or did not want to use the hourly CEM inventory . The facility- level comparison of CEM to emission inventory NO x 

## and SO 2 

## emiss ions found that for some facilities, the annual emissions from the S/Linventory exceeded the CEM annual emissions because the facility in the S/Linventory

contained more than just CEM units. This condition was determined to be acceptable. However, S/L agencies were asked to review data for facilities where the CEM emissions were higher than the emissions summed from the S/L inventory . For these cases, CEM emissions may be higher than those reported in a S/Linventory due to methods EPA uses for using artificially high default values to fill in hourly CEM data when not reported or when a CEM unit was not working properly. After reviewing the comparison of the CEM to S/L inventory emissions, New York and Vermont elected to use the 2002 CEM inventory containing hourly

NO x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions for all facilities. Maryland; New Hampshire; and Allegheny County, Penns ylvania elected to use the 2002 CEM data for some but not all of the facilities within their jurisdiction. The Excel Workbook files containing the comparison of CEM to S/Linventories provides a spreadsheet identifying the facilities for which these S/L agencies elected to use the CEM inventory . Subsequent to the completion of this analysis, it was determined that the structure of the EPA/CAMD file would not be compatible with the format of the SMOKE input file. The database structure did not affect the annual emissions summed from the hourly CEM emissions used in the comparison to S/L inventory data. For each of the S/Lagencies that elected to use the 2002 CEM data, CAMD agreed to provide separate database files for each state with a structure compatible with the SMOKE input file format. Pechan then used the crosswalk to add to the CEM inventory

files the state and county FIPS, state facility ID, and EU ID (if the crosswalk contains a CEM unit to EU match) to the hourly CEM database files provided by CAMD. The modified database was then used to create the SMOKE input files for these states.

## 8

Note that Delaware requested that the 2002 CEM inventory for its facilities not be used for regional haze modeling. However, if the consolidated point source inventory prepared under this project is used to support ozone episode modeling, Delaware may consider using the CEM hourly data for the episodes modeled. Therefore, the 2002 CEM inventory was also processed for Delaware’s facilities.

ii. PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level (for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

 If a process was associated with a PM emission record, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., condensible PM (PM - CON) is associated with fuel combustion only]): filterable PM 10 

## (PM10 - FIL), primary PM 10 

## (PM10 - PRI), filterable PM 2.5 

## (PM25 - FIL), primary PM 2.5 

## (PM25 - PRI), or PM - CON, the record was flagged for review.

 The following equations were used to determine consistency : PM10 - FIL + PM - CON = PM10 - PRI PM25 - FIL + PM - CON = PM25 - PRI PM - FIL + PM - CON = PM - PRI

 The following comparisons were applied to determine consistency : PM10 - PRI>= PM10 - FIL PM25 - PRI>= PM25 - FIL PM10 - PRI>= PM - CON PM25 - PRI>= PM - CON PM10 - FIL >= PM25 - FIL PM10 - PRI>= PM25 - PRI PM - PRI>= PM10 - PRI PM - PRI>= PM25 - PRI PM - FIL >= PM10 - FIL PM - FIL >= PM25 - FIL If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an error, summarized in an Excel Workbook file, and provided to the S/Lagency for corrections. If a S/L agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected or filled in according to the augmentation procedures.

## 9 iii. ERP Coordinate Review Location coordinates for point sources were evaluated using geographic information system (GI S) mapping to determine if the coordinates were within 0.5 -kilometers of the boundary of the county in which the source was located. If not, the S/Lagency was asked to review the coordinates and provide corrections to either the coordinates or the state and county FIPS codes. The 0.5 -kilometer test resulted in a large number of ERPs for review b y the agencies. Therefore, to assist S/Lagencies in prioritizing their review of coordinates, ERP records with coordinates located more than 0.5, 1, 2, 3 , 5, 7, and 10 or more kilometers from their county boundary, and coordinates that mapped outside of their state boundary were identified. Annual emissions summed to the ERP level were included in the QA Summary Report to identify

records with zero emissi ons for all pollutants and to identify the highest emitting stacks. The QA Summary Report was provided to the S/Lagency for review and corrections. iv. ERP Parameter Review The EPA’s QA guidance for diagnosing ERP issues for the point source NEI (EPA , 2004b) was applied to identify

QA issues in the S/Lpoint source inventories. The QA guidance involved diagnosing the correct assignment of the ERP ty pe (i.e., stack or fugitive), parameters with zero values, parameters not within the range of values sp ecified in the EPA’s QA procedures, and consistency

checks (i.e., comparing calculated values against the values reported in the inventory). In many

cases errors were caused by missing or zero values. In other cases, out- ofrange errors were caused by unit conversion issues (e.g., stack parameters were in ft, ft/sec, cu ft/sec, or degrees Fahrenheit). The QA issues were summarized in a separate QA Summary Report for each agency

and each agency

was asked to provide corrections. If an agency did not provi de corrections for out- of -range or missing values, the data were corrected or filled in according to the ERP augmentation procedures.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Review The CE codes in the “Primary Device Ty

pe Code” and “Secondary Device Ty pe Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid codes (i.e., codes that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data). QA review of c ontrol efficiency data involved diagnosis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency

values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%). The second check identified records where 100% control was reported in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% (implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or z ero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater

## 10

than zero. The records that met these criteria were summarized in a QA Summary Report for review and correction, if necessary, by the S/Lagency . vi. Start and End Date Checks QA review was conducted to identify start date and end date values in the PE and EM tables to confirm consistency

with the inventory

year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the start date reported. This check did not identify any QA issues in the three versions of the inventory .

vii. Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison The following QA checks were conducted to identify potential errors associated with the incorrect reporting of daily and/or annual emissions:

 Any “DAILY” type record that is greater than its associated “ANNUAL”. A review of the daily vs. annual comparison revealed that in many cases, the daily

value was nonzero (but very

small), but the annual value was zero. This was generally a result of rounding in a S/Lagency ’s original emissions database, where annual records were recorded in tons per ye ar to a set number of decimal places, while the corresponding daily records were recorded in pounds per year to a set number of decimal places. The annual record rounds to zero in the original database, while the daily value remains non- zero. A tolerance check reveals the following (comparison in tons):

 Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> 0  Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> . 000001  Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .00001  Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .0001  Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .001  Difference Tolerance (daily - annual)> .01 For Version 1, the affected S/Lagencies were as follows:

 Connecticut (09) 11 records  Maine (23) 4 records  Maryland (24) 72 records  New Jersey

(34) 2935 records  Pennsylvania Allegheny County (42003) 17 records  Pennsylvania Philadelphia County (42101) 146 records  Rhode I sland (44) 1 record Rhode I sland, Philadelphi a, and New Jersey responded that the dailies that were greater than the annuals could be deleted. Maryland determined that they should be kept since the difference values were small. The records for the remaining S/Lagencies were kept. This QA issue only occurred during processing of Version 1.

## 11 **b. Responses from S/L agencies**  Each S/Lagency

reviewed its “QA Summary Report” files and the S/L agency provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel files or via e -mail. The inventory

was then revised to incorporate responses from each agency and the QA checks were run again to verify

that the QA issues were addressed. If an agency responded to a QA issue by e -mail, the direction was recorded in the “QA Summary Report” file. The “QA Summary Report” file for each S/L agency was updated to document QA issues and resolution of issues associated with developing Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory . The “QA Summary Report” files for Version 3 are provided with thi s report in a separate zip file. The files in the zip file are organized in separate folders for each S/L agency . Each folder includes a separate Excel workbook file for the following QA checks if a QA issue existed:

 PM Augmentation QA Summary ;  Stack Parameter QA Summary ;  Stack Coordinates QA Summary ;  Stack Parameter and Coordinate Augmentation Summary ;  CEM Comparisons and Revisions; and  Control Device/Efficiency Summary .

**c. Gap Filling and Augmentation**  The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were used to fill in missing data that were not supplied b y the S/Lagencies. The S/L agencies approved the procedures before they were applied. These procedures were applied after revising the inventory to address QA issues as directed b y each S/Lagency .

i. MANE- VU

-Sponsored Inventories MANE -VU prepared a 2002 NH 3 

## emissions inventory for cement kilns for SCCs 30500606 and 30500706 located in four MANE -VU states. Maryland chose to add one new facility 24013/0012 (state and county FIPS code/facility

ID). New York chose to add the following three sites 36001/4010300016, 36001/4012400001, and 36111/3514800084. Maine and Pennsylvania chose not to add emissions from this inventory . The data for Maryland and New York were added to Version 1. These data were not changed in Versions 2 and 3 of the point source inventory . ii. PM Augmentation The PM augmentations process gap - fills missing PM pollutant complements. For example, if a S/Lagency

provided only

PM10 - PRIpollutants the PM augmentati on process filled in the PM25 - PRIpollutants. The steps in the PM augmentation process were as follows:

 Step 1: Initial QA and remediation of S/L provided PM pollutants;

## 12

 Step 2: Development of PM factor ratios based on factors from the Factor In formati on and REtrieval (FIRE) Data S ystem, version 6.2, and the PM Calculator (EPA, 2003a; EPA, 2004c);  Step 3: Implementation of the ratios developed in step 2.; and  Step 4: Presentation of PM augmentation results to S/L agencies for review and comment. An Access database (named Reference Tables for PM Augmentation ) accompanies this document. This database contains the SCC Control Device Ratio table, the Emission Factors table, and Emission Factors Crosstab table discussed in Step 2. The Emission Factors Crosstab table contains the ratios developed from the Emission Factors table. The Emission Factors table contains detailed information on the emission factors used to develop the ratios. The PM Calculator ratio table can be provided upon request

– it contains all possible combinations for SCC and Control Device ty pes that are available in the PM Calculator. Ratios from the PM calculator were developed using a standard input of 100 TONS of uncontrolled PM - FIL emissions. 1. Initial QA and Remediation of PM Pollutants S/Lagencies were initially presented with files that detailed potential inconsistencies and missing information in their PM pollutant inventory . Inconsistencies in PM pollutants include the following:

 PM - PRIless than PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , PM1 0 - FIL, PM25 - FIL, or PM - CON;  PM - FIL less than PM10 - FIL, PM25 - FIL;  PM10 - PRIless than PM25 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - FIL or PM - CON;  PM10 - FIL less than PM25 - FIL;  PM25 - PRIless than PM25 - FIL or PM - CON;  The sum of PM10 - FIL and PM - CON not equal to PM10 - PRI ; and  The sum of PM25 - FIL and PM - CON not equal to PM25 - PRI . Potential missing information was summarized in a table which detailed the variety of cases provided b y each S/Lagency . For example, an S/L agency might have provided PM10 - FIL and PM25 - FIL for some process es, but provided only PM10 - FIL for other processes. S/Lagencies were asked to review this information and provide corrections where possible. In general, corrections (or general directions) were provided in the case of the potential inconsistency

issues . An example of a general direction provided by a S/L agency

was to remove PM25 - FIL where greater than PM10 - FIL because the PM10 - FIL was (in their particular case) known to be more reliable. In other cases, the agency-provided specific process - level pollutant corrections. If specific direction was not provided by the agency, zero PM pollutants were generally

removed, or complements were set equal to the higher number.

## 13

2. Development of PM Factor Ratio The primary

deliverable of this step of the process was the development of a table keyed by SCC, primary

control device, and secondary control device. This table is called the SCC Control Device Ratios table (see Table II- 1). This table was filled according to the following steps:

 Ratios (both condensib le and noncondensible) were added from FIRE for SCCs starting with 10* (external fuel combustion) and 20* (internal fuel combustion) where there was a direct match between the provided SCC, and primary and secondary control devices.

 Ratios (non- condensabl e) were added from the PM Calculator for SCCs starting with 10* and 20* where there was not a direct match between the provided SCC, and primary and secondary

control devices. Condensible ratios were added from the PM Calculator based on the uncontrolled SCC for these SCCs. In some cases, it was necessary to map the SCC and control devices to the PM calculator to find a match for the noncondensible ratios. In other cases, it was necessary to map the SCC to FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios.

 For natural gas, process gas, and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) SCCs starting with 10* and 20*, it was assumed (based on FIRE emission factors) that the PM PRI/PM10 - PRI/PM25 - PRIratio was equal to 1. It was also assumed that the PM FIL/PM10 - FIL /PM25 - FIL was equal to 1. Condensible ratios were calculated from uncontrolled FIRE emission factors for these SCCs. In some cases it was necessary to map the SCC to FIRE to find a match for condensible ratios.

 Ratios for SCCs not like 10* and 20* were obtained f rom the PM Calculator. It was assumed that the condensible component was zero.

## 14

**Table II -**  **1. Description of the Field Names and Descriptions for the SCC Control Device Ratios**  **Table** Field Name Field Description PM Calculator A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the PM Calculator FIRE A “Yes” in this field indicates that at least some of the information was retrieved from the Emission Factors table. A “Condensible Ratios” in this field indicates that th e condensible ratios factors were retrieved from this table. Other A field to indicate other sources as necessary. SCC Source category code from the S/L agency- provided data. SCC_DESC Description of source category code from the S/L agency- provided data . maptoSCC This field equals SCC unless the SCC provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the SCC was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. maptoSCC_DESC Description of the maptoSCC. mapSCCNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SCC. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SCC was mapped. PD Primary device type from the S/L agency provided data. PD_DESC Description of the primary device (PD). maptoPD This field equals PD unless the PD provi ded was not found in the appropriate source table. In that case, the PD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. maptoPD_DESC Description of the maptoPD. mapPDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the PD. A “Yes” in this fi eld indicates that the PD was mapped. SD Secondary device type from the S/L agency provided data. SD_DESC Description of the secondary device (SD). maptoSD This field equals SD unless the SD provided was not found in the appropriate source table. In th at case, the SD was mapped using the closest available appropriate mapping choice. maptoSD_DESC Description of the maptoSD. mapSDNote Any notes related to the mapping of the SD. A “Yes” in this field indicates that the SD was mapped. PM - FIL/PM10 - FIL Th is field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM - FIL/PM25 - FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM - FIL/P M - PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM - PRI/PM10 - PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM - PRI/PM25 - PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM10 - FIL/PM25 - FIL This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM c alculator. PM10 - PRI/PM25 - PRI This field and the following are ratios calculated from emission factors found either in FIRE or the PM calculator. PM - CON/PM10 - FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensibl e ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. PM - CON/PM10 - PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were s et to zero. PM - CON/PM25 - FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. PM - CON/PM25 - PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. PM - CON/PM - FIL Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. PM - CON/PM - PRI Condensible ratios were calculate from FIRE if available for 10* and 20* SCCs. If condensible ratios were not found in FIRE for 10* and 20* these ratios were set to zero. RPO Specific Note Indicates SCC and control device combinations are in the RPO inventory. Additional Notes Any notes regarding assumptions about ratios.

## 15

3. Implementation of the QA Ratios In order to calculate the additional PM pollutants based on the S CC Control Device ratio table developed in the above step, a crosstab table was created from the EM table based on the following fields:

 State FIPS  County

FIPS  Tribal Code  EU ID  Process ID  Start Date  End Date  Emission Ty

pe  SCC  Primary

Device Ty

pe  Secondary

Device Ty

pe The primary

and secondary

device type fields were added based on information from the CE table. If CE information was not available these fields were defaulted to 000 (“UNCONTROLLED”). In the few cases where there was a conflict between the control devices reported for the same process for PM pollutants (e.g., a PM10 - PRIis listed as controlled, but PM - PRIdid not have control information), the control device type was selected based on the controlled pollutant. In addition to the fields listed above, the crosstab included the PM emission amounts for the particular process and a field that indicated whether those emissions existed in the inventory . These fields were as follows:

 PM_PRI  PM_FIL  PM10_PRI  PM10_FIL  PM25_PRI  PM25_FIL  PM_CON  PM_P RI

_EXI STS  PM_FIL_EXISTS  PM10_PRI

_EXI STS  PM10_FIL_EXISTS  PM25_PRI

_EXI STS  PM25_FIL_EXISTS  PM_CON_EXI STS

## 16

The emission values were in the PM_PRI , PM_FIL, PM10_PRI , PM10_FIL, PM25_PRI , PM25_FIL, PM_CON fields. The _EXISTS field indicated whether the pollutant was provided by the S/L agency . A zero indicated that the pollutant was not provided; a number greater than zero (usually

one) indicates that it was provided by the S/L agency . Prior to the development of this crosstab, the EM table was filled in as much as possible using basic assumptions. For example, if the S/Lagency provided zero emissions for some but not all forms of PM for a particular process, it was assumed that all forms of PM for that process were zero and they

were filled in accordingly. S ince that assumption was that for non 10* and 20* SCCs, the condensible value was zero

– that would lead to PM10 - FIL = PM10 - PRIand PM25 - FIL = PM25 - PRIand PM - FIL = PM - PRI . Given that assumption, values for these pollutants were also filled in. After thi s data insertion, a subset of the crosstab was created. This subset only contained processes that required additional augmentation. The SCC Control Device Ty pe ratio table was based on only those SCC and control device types that required augmentation. The next step was to fill in the missing information in this crosstab using the information found in the SCC Control Device Ratio table. In calculating PM complement pollutants, priority was given to calculating

–PRIand

–CON pollutants. FIL pollutants were only calculated if necessary to calculate other pollutants or if it was a b y-product of this calculation. In augmenting the PM pollutants, the non 10* and 20* SCCs were augmented first, with order given to augmenting based on PM 10 

## where available, P M 2.5 

## where available, and then PM. Augmenting the PM pollutants for the 10* and 20* SCCs is more complicated, but the basic approach was to augment based on PM 10 

## (FIL or PRI) where available, PM 2.5 

## (FIL or PRI) where available, and then PM (FIL or PRI) if PM 10 

## or PM 2.5 

## variations were not available. Where both PM 10 

## (FIL or PRI) and PM 2.5 

## (FIL or PRI) variations were both available, the calculation for PM - CON was generally driven from the PM 10 

## number and the complements as necessary were back calculated. Where a PRIemission factor ratio was required and was not available, the FIL emission factor ratio was used. After completing the calculations, the data was QA checked to ensure that the calculations resulted in consistent values for the PM complement. On a few occasions, the mix of ratio value and the pollutants and values provided b y the S/Lagency resulted in negative values when FIL was back- calculated. In this case the negative FIL value was set to zero and the PRI value was readjusted. In a few c ases the appropriate combination of ratios, SCC, and control efficiencies were not available to calculate the PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIvalues. In these cases, PM10 - PRI and PM25 - PRIwere set equal. The resultant PM table information was appended to the EM ta ble. Note: The augmentation procedures resulted in some high condensible ratios that were calculated for some SCC control device type combinations. In most cases, these high condensible ratios were the result of the back calculation of PM - CON from PMxx -PRIrecords.

## 17

Since the state had already provided the PMxx - PRI records, these PM - CON values were not added. The data source code field was used to identify records that were added to the inventory to complete the set of PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions.

iii. ERP Coordinates If an S/Lagency

did not provide corrections for ERP coordinates that map more than 5 km outside of the county boundary, or provide coordinates for ERP records that did not have any coordinates in the S/Linventory, the following procedures were applied to replace the coordinates:

 Coordinates for other ERPs at the same facility, if available, that map within the county ;  Coordinates for the centroid of the zip code for a facility if a valid zip code was provided or could be obtained from the agency if it is not valid; or  County

centroid coordinates. The zip code was taken from the SINIF 3.0 table. The zip code was compared to a reference table of valid zip codes to verify that it was an active zip code and existed in the state and county reported in the inventory . If a valid zip code for a facility could not be identified, the centroid for the facility ’s county

was used as a last resort. In some cases, the S/Lagency provided confirmation that the S/L coordinates were correct even if the analys is indicated that the coordinates were outside of the county. These coordinates were not changed. Additionally, all coordinates were converted to latitude/longitude measurements.

iv. ERP Parameters If valid ERP parameters were not provided by the S/Lagency, the ERP augmentation procedures that EPA developed for the 2002 point source NEI were applied to the MANE -VU inventory (EPA, 2004b). It has been determined that the augmentation procedures in this document regarding SCC - specific ERP ty pes and temperatures may be difficult to resolve. When this situation occurs, preference was given to the S/L agency - supplied ERP ty pe and SCC. For example, the procedures do not account for cases where an EU has two processes with one defined as a stack source and the other as a fugitive source. Therefore, the S/L - supplied ERP ty pe was used when this situation occurred. If the ERP ty pe was null, and information was not available from the S/Lagency, the stack height information was used as a guide. If stack height information was available, the ERP was treated as a stack, if stack height information was not available, the ERP was treated as a fugitive. An additional modification to the augmentation procedure was also implemented. Since in many cases null values were filled in with zeros by S/Llocal databases when comparing out- of - range velocities and flows (after it was determined that the stack and diameter information was correct)

– null and zero values were treated in the same manner to prevent inappropriate replacement of stack parameter values. Additionally, stack parameter values were rounded to 1 decimal place when comparing with range values (just

## 18

for the purposes of comparison) to prevent replacement of S/L parameter values based on ne gligible decimal differences.

v. Control Device Type and Control Efficiency Data Control efficiencies that were 100% and rule effectiveness of 100% with non- zero emissions were diagnosed as potential errors and sent to the S/Lagencies. Where possible these data were updated with S/Ldata corrections. Decimal control efficiencies were also diagnosed and sent to the S/Lagencies. A decimal control efficiency was usually

a sign that a control efficiency had not been entered as a percentage as is require d by NIF 3.0. Where possible these data was updated with S/Ldata corrections.

**c. QA Review of Final Inventory**  Final QA checks were run on the revised point source inventory data set to ensure that all corrections provided b y the S/Lagencies were incorporated into the S/Linventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. The EPA QA program was run on the inventory and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could b e addressed were resolved. The QA output file was provided in an Access database along with Version 3 of the inventory .

**3. Version 3 Emissions Summary**  Table II - 2 presents a State - level summary of the annual point source emissions in Version 3 of the 2 002 MANE -VU inventory . Note that PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions are included in the inventory

for all SCCs for which S/Lagencies reported any form of PM, PM 10 

## , and/or PM 2.5 

## emissions. If an agency

did not report PM10 - PRIand/or PM25 - PRIbut reported PM - PRI , PM FIL, PM - CON, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency

to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency reported PM10 - PRI and/or PM25 - PRIemissions but not PM10 - FIL, PM25 - FIL, or PM - CON emissions, the agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or condensible emissions. Note that PM - CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources.

## 19

**Table II -** **2. Versio n 3 2002 MA**  **NE -** **VU Point Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year) State**  **CO NH**  **3 NO**  **x PM10**  **- FIL**  **PM10 -** 

**PRI PM25**  **-**

**FIL PM25**  **-**

**PRI PM**  **- CON**  **SO 2**  **VOC** Connecticut 4,053 12,923 738 1,617 0 1,283 389 15,988 4,907 Delaware 9,766 196 16,345 2,466 4,217 1,919 3,666 1,750 73 ,744 4,755 District of Columbia 248 4 780 91 161 54 132 68 963 69 Maine 17,005 845 19,939 4,535 7,289 2,567 5,787 2,753 23,711 5,319 Maryland 99,024 305 95,328 3,723 9,029 0 5,054 2,018 290,927 6,184 Massachusetts 21,262 1,463 47,086 2,776 5,852 997 4 ,161 2,984 101,049 8,263 New Hampshire 2,725 74 9,759 1,180 3,332 786 2,938 2,151 46,560 1,599 New Jersey 12,300 51,593 2,928 6,072 2,543 4,779 3 61,217 14,401 New York 66,427 1,861 118,978 1,808 10,392 1,965 7,080 210 294,729 11,456 Pennsylvania 121 ,524 1,388 297,379 18,044 40,587 6,038 20,116 5,065 995,175 37,323 Rhode Island 2,234 58 2,764 233 300 117 183 68 2,666 1,928 Vermont 1,078 787 130 304 97 267 2 905 1,097 **MA NE**  **- VU**  **357,645 6,194**  **673,660 38,654**  **89,150 17,083**  **55,447 17,462**  **1,907,634 97,3**  **00**

## 20

**B. State** **- Specific Methods**  For each of the MANE - VU states and two local agencies in Penns ylvania, this section identifies the temporal basis of the emissions included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this section also discusses the origin of each S/Lagency ’s emissions included in Version 3. For each agency, a table is provided in Appendix A that lists the data source codes b y SCC, emission ty pe period, and pollutant. In addition, an electronic folder is provided for each S/L agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared during Version 1 and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3.

**1. Connecticut**  Connecticut’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the following revisions that Connecticut provided for Version 2 and included in Version 3:

 Changed coordinates for AES Thames, Inc. in New London County to - 72.3184, 41.4499 (FIPS code 09011, facility identifier 1544).

 Changed values for Hartford S team (FIPS code 09003, facility identifier 3471), EU P0250, process 02 for summer daily values as follows: Changed actual throughput from 1934 E6FT3 to 1.934 E6FT3, CO summer daily emissions from 53.185 tons to 0.0532 tons, NO x 

## summer daily emissions from 255.288 tons to 0.1021 tons, and VOC summer daily emissions from 1.2569 tons to 0.0027 tons. Table II - 3 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Connecticut provided emissions. **Table II -** **3. Connecticut 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Da**  **te, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 27 NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 27 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table A- 1 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Connecticut provided the data for CO, NO x 

## , PM10 - PRI , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Connecticut did not provide any data for NH 3 

## . Emissions for PM10 - FIL, P M25 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, and PM - CON were calculated from the PM10 - PRIemissions provided by Connecticut using the PM augmentation procedures.

## 21 **2. Delaware**  Delaware’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for some updates to ORI S B oiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in Version 3. Table II - 4 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Delaware provided emissions. **Table II -** **4. Delaware 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End D**  **ate, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table A- 2 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Delaware provided the data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Delaware also provided much of the PM emissions data but in some cases the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the PM data provided b y Delaware to calculate emissions for other f orms of PM (e.g., to estimate PM10 - PRIfrom PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRIfrom PM25 - FIL, PM10 - PRIand PM10 - FIL from PM25 - PRIand PM25 - FIL).

**3. District of Columbia**  The District of Columbia’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II - 5 shows the emission ty pe period for which the District of Columbia provided emissions. **Table II -** **5. District of Columbia 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type** 

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

## Table A- 3 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. The District of Columbia provi ded the data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. The District of Columbia provided at least one form of PM emissions and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions provided by the District of Columbia to calculate emissions for the other for ms of PM.

## 22 **4. Maine**  Maine’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II - 6 shows the emission ty

pe periods for which Maine provided emissions.

**Table II -** **6. Maine 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date,**  **and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table A- 4 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Maine provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Maine provided PM10 - FIL and/or PM25 - FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Maine provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

**5. Maryland**  Maryland’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for some updates to ORI S Boiler IDs in the EU table that were incorporated into Version 2 and included in Version 3. Table II - 7 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Maryland provided emissions. **Table II -** **7. Mary land 2002 Point, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20040101 200 41231 30 NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL 20020501 20020930 29 NONANNUAL 20040101 20041231 29 

## Table A- 5 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties b y SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Maryland provided the emi ssions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , VOC, PM10 - PRI , and PM - PRI . The PM augmentation procedures were applied to the PM10 - PRIemissions that Maryland provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Maryland provided NH 3 

## emissions for its point sources except for one new facility (state and county FIPS code 24013, facility ID 0012, SCC 30500622, data source code P) for which it used NH 3 

## emissions for four EUs (preheater kiln/dry

process) prepared by

MANE - VU.

## 23 **6. Massachusetts**  Massachusetts’ Versi on 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the some stack parameter revisions that Massachusetts provided and were incorporated into Version 3. For Version 3, Massachusetts provided revisions to stack parameters in the ERP table for six EUs at three facilities. The revisions are listed in the Excel file named “MA Revisions to MANEVU V3 Point EI_040706.xls”. Table II - 8 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions.

**Table II -** **8. Massachusetts 2002 Point , Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20030101 20031231 30 

## Table A- 6 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Massachusetts provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Massachusetts provided PM - FIL, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Massachusetts provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

**7. New Hampshire**  New Hampshire’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II - 9 shows the emission ty pe periods for which New Hampshire provided emissions. **Table II -** **9. New Hampshire 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table A- 7 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. New Hampshire provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New Hampshire provided PM - FIL, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Hampshire provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

## 24 **8. New Jersey**  New Jersey ’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. In addition to the QA checks discussed previously in this TSD, New Jersey ’s original inventory submittal to EPA contained several issues with SCCs. For Version 1, per direction provided by New Jersey, SCCs that were less than 8 digits were changed to SCCs with 8 digits. Also, as approved b y New Jersey, inactive SCC 39999901 was changed to active SCC 39999999. The invalid unit “GAL” was changed to the valid unit “E6GAL” in the EP table. Table II - 10 shows the emission ty pe periods for which New Jersey provided emiss ions. **Table II -**  **10. New Jersey 2002 Point, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 200208 31 29 

## Table A- 8 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. New Jersey

provided the emissions data for CO, NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New Jersey provided PM PRI , PM10 - PRI , and/or PM25 - PRIemi ssions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New Jersey provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New Jersey

did not provide any

data for NH 3 

## . **9. New York**  New York’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1 except for the following revisions that New York provided and were incorporated into Version 3. For Version 3, New York provided an Access database named “MANEVU_NY2002_ Point_Corrected_093005.mdb” with revisions to records in the EM table. New York also provided in this database 651 records that were not included in Version 2 of MANE -VU's point source inventory, and, therefore, these records were added to Version 3 of MANE -VU's point source inventory . The new records added emissions for pollutants (not in Version 2) for EUs and processes that existed in Version 2 of MANE -VU's point source inventory . The records in Version 2 that were revised and the records that were added to Version 3 are listed in the Excel file named “NY Revisions to MANE -VU V3 Point EI _040706.xls”. Table II - 11 shows the emission ty pe period for which New York provided emissions.

## 25 **Table II -**  **11. New York 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type** 

**Emission Ty pe**  **Pe riod**  **Start Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 

## Table A- 9 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. New York provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. New York provided PM - PRI , PM10 - PRI , and/or PM25 - PRIemissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that New York provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. New York provided NH 3 

## emissions for its po int sources except for four cement kilns for which it used NH 3 

## emissions from a MANE - VU - sponsored inventory . The following identifies the facilities for which the MAEN -VU - sponsored NH 3 

## emissions inventory for cement kilns was used. **FIPS Code Facility**  **ID SCC**  **Data Source** 36001 4010300016 30500606 (2 kilns/dry process) P 36001 4012400001 30500706 (1 kiln/wet process) P 36111 3514800084 30500606 (1 kiln/dry process) P 

## 10. **Pennsylvania (State, Excluding Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties)** The Version 3 point source inventory for the state of Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. The following summary

excludes Allegheny and Philadelphia Counties who provided their own point source inventories for Versions 1, 2, and 3. Table II - 12 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions. Table A- 10 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Pennsylvania provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Pennsylvania provided PM10 - PRIand/or PM25 - PRIemissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Pennsylvania provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

## 26 **Table II -**  **12. Pennsy lvania 200**  **2 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**  **Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe Emission** 

**Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20020104 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20020812 30 ANNUAL 20 020101 20020111 30 ANNUAL 20020131 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020120 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020228 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020123 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020424 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020130 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020131 30 ANNUAL 20 020201 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020212 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021030 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020215 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020221 30 ANNUAL 20020201 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020228 30 ANNUAL 20020205 20021223 30 ANNUAL 2 0020101 20020313 30 ANNUAL 20020213 20020913 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020329 30 ANNUAL 20020214 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020216 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020412 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020331 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020414 30 ANNUAL 2 0020301 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020422 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020427 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020503 30 ANNUAL 20020301 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020514 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021213 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020517 30 ANNUAL 20020311 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020521 30 ANNUAL 20020314 20021209 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020318 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020603 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20020915 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020614 30 ANNUAL 20020320 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020626 30 ANNUAL 20020328 20021120 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020628 30 ANNUAL 20020330 20021122 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020630 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020430 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020701 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020531 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020813 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020401 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020909 30 ANNUAL 20020409 20021205 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021117 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020415 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021101 30 ANNUAL 20020421 20021024 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021112 30 ANNUAL 20020424 20021016 30 ANNUA L 20020101 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020428 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021213 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20020922 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021216 30 ANNUAL 20020429 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021217 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20020630 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021220 30 ANNUA L 20020501 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021013 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021031 30 ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020501 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20020703 30 ANNUAL 20020506 20021202 30 ANNU AL 20020102 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20020511 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021215 30 ANNUAL 20020515 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020519 20020727 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021227 30 ANNUAL 20020525 20021231 30

## 27 **Table II -**  **12. (Continued) Emis**  **sion Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe Emission** 

**Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020102 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020602 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021229 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021230 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020102 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020601 20021019 30 ANNUAL 20020103 20021126 30 ANNUAL 20020603 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020103 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020606 20021127 30 ANNUAL 20020103 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020629 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020104 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020731 30 ANNUAL 20020104 20021223 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020104 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020701 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020105 20021218 30 ANNUAL 20020708 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020105 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020831 30 ANNUAL 20020106 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020107 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021130 30 ANNUAL 20020108 20021221 30 ANNUAL 20020801 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020108 20021228 30 ANNUAL 20020802 20021231 30 ANNUA L 20020110 20021204 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20020930 30 ANNUAL 20020111 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020901 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020113 20021006 30 ANNUAL 20020920 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020114 20021203 30 ANNUAL 20021001 20021030 30 ANNUAL 20020115 20020318 30 ANNUA L 20021001 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020115 20020323 30 ANNUAL 20021028 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020115 20020326 30 ANNUAL 20021101 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020115 20020830 30 ANNUAL 20021118 20021231 30 ANNUAL 20020123 20020127 30 ANNUAL 20021201 20021231 30 ANNU AL 20020124 20021127 30 

## 11. **Pennsylvania (Allegheny County, FIPS code 42003)** The Version 3 point source inventory for Allegheny

County, Pennsylvania originates from Version 1. Table II - 13 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Allegheny County provided emissions. **Table II -**  **13. Pennsy lvania**  **- Al**  **legheny County 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20011201 2 0020228 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29

## 28

Table A- 11 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Allegheny

County provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Allegheny County provided PM - FIL, PM10 - FIL, PM25 - FIL, and/or PM - CON emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Allegheny County provided to calculate emis sions for the other forms of PM.

**12. Pennsylvania (Philadelphia County, FIPS code 42101)**  The Version 3 point source inventory for Philadelphia County, Penns ylvania originates from Version 1. Table II - 14 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Philadelphia County provided emissions. **Table II -**  **14. Pennsy lvania**  **- Philadelphia County 2002 Point, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NON ANNUAL 20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table A- 12 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Philadelphia County provided the emissions data for CO, NH 3 

## , NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Philadelphia County

provided PM - FIL, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL emissions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Philadelphia County provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM.

**13. Rhode Island**  Rhode I sland requested that their Version 2 inventory be replaced with the CAP and NH 3 

## inventory in the final 2002 point source NEI that EPA released during March 2006. Therefore, all of Rhode Island’s point source data in Version 2 was replaced with the point source data provided in the final 2002 point source NEI. The following provides a summary of the QA issues identified and addressed in Version 1. The Excel file named “RI Revis ions to MANE -VU V3 Point EI

_040706.xls” provides documentation and correction of each of these issues for Version 3. The Site table in the NEI did not include the ORI S IDs for all of the EGUs identified in the EGU crosswalk table. Therefore, the crosswalk table was used to add the ORIS IDs to the Site table. Matching of boiler IDs to the EU table for one facility was maintained in the NEI, and, therefore, included in Version 3 of MANE -VU’s inventory . However, matching of boiler IDs for other facilitie s was not available in the crosswalk table.

## 29

The data source codes that EPA used in the Rhode Island’s point source inventory for the NEI were maintained in the MANE -VU inventory . The following defines the codes:

**Code Description**  A Augmented PM data. CAMD Record only in 2002 Emission Tracking System (ETS)/CEM for

SO 2 

## , NO x 

## , and heat input values; other emissions estimated. SCAMD1 Data were received from the state. The state’s NO x 

## and SO 2



## emission values were replaced with the ETS values. 99_PMPRI Not defined

– presumed to mean PM - PRIdata originating from the

1999 NEI. SUM Primary

PM emissions calculated as the sum of the filterable PM and PM - CON emissions DIFF PM - CON emissions calculated as the difference between the

primary PM and filterable PM emissions QA of PM emissions was also performed in accordance with the QAPP for the 2002 base ye ar inventory for EM table records that were revised or added for Rhode Island and New York. As a result, it was identified that the emission ton value was not correctly calculated from the emission unit numerator and emission numeric value fields in the NEI file, therefore, the emission ton value was corrected for the MANE - VU inventory . In addition, the final NEI for Rhode I sland contained NH 3 

## emissions for several facilities but no SCCs were provided for the NH 3 

## emissions; therefore, the NH 3 

## emissions were removed for the MANE - VU inventory as requested b y Rhode Island. For Version 3 of MANE - VU's inventory, Facility ID EGU1036 and Facility Name MANCHESTER STREET in the final 2002 NEI was changed to Facility ID AIR936 and Facility Name USGEN NEW ENGLAND INC per Rhode Island’s request because this is the same facility (with ORI S ID 3236). Also, for State Facility ID AIR594, EU ID 2, ERP 2, and Process ID2, the SCC was changed from 39000589 to 39000599. In addition, the ORI S IDs reported in the NEI were revised to make them consistent with the crosswalk prepared for MANE - VU that matches state facility

IDs to ORI S IDs. One issue was identified with one record for Rhode Island where the sum of the PM10 - FIL and PM - CON emissions was more than the PM10 - PRIemissions, and the sum of the PM25 - FIL and PM - CON emissions was more than the PM25 - PRIemissions for facility ID AIR1248 in County FIPS 44007; SCC 10300601 (External Combustion Boilers : Commercial/Institutional : Natural Gas : > 100 Million Btu/hr). In addition, the PM10 - FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM10 - PRIemissions reported, and the PM25 - FIL emissions reported was 1.6 tons more than the PM25 - PRIemissions reported for this facility. The record has very low emissions and it was not clear how the PM consistency issues should be addressed; therefore, due to time and resource constraints, this issue was not corrected in Version 3. Table II - 15 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Rhode Island provided emissions.

## 30 **Table II -**  **15. Rhode Island 2002 Point, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 20020831 30 

## Table A- 13 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the numb er of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Rhode Island provided the emissions data for CO, NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , VOC, and PM - PRI . The EPA applied PM augmentation procedures to the PM - PRIemissions that Rhode Island provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. The EPA added NH 3 

## emissions for an EGU from EPA’s CAMD data; otherwise, NH 3 

## emissions are not available for other point sources in Rhode Island.

**14. Vermont**  Vermont’s Version 3 point source inventory originates from Version 1. Table II - 16 shows the emission ty

pe periods for which Vermont provided emissions.

**Table II -**  **16. Ver mont 2002 Point, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 NONANNUAL 20020101 20020331 27 NONANNUAL 20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL 20020601 2 0020831 27 

## Table A- 14 in Appendix A identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 point source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Vermont provided the emissions data for CO, NO x 

## , SO 2 

## , and VOC. Vermont provided PM - FIL, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL emi ssions data and the PM augmentation procedures were applied to the emissions that Vermont provided to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM. Vermont’s inventory does not include NH 3 

## emissions. **C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi**  **ons?** This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporate into future versions of the MANE -VU point source inventory .

## 31

All States

– A coordinated effort between the S/L agencies should be developed to apply consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedures to augment inventory data to correct for the QA issues and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied across S/Lagencies to ensure accurate rep orting of stack parameters, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that were identified during the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory . For PM emissions, the S/L agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for including condensible emissions for fuel combustion sources that can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This may include compiling the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control ty

pe (for filterable emiss ions), and sharing the database among the MANE -VU S/L agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE -VU inventory as well as ensure that condensible emissions are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory . The EGU crosswalk should be maintained to ensure that State Facility IDs and EU IDs are correctly matched with ORI S IDs and boiler IDs. State - specific suggestions are as follows: Connecticut, New Jersey, Rhode I sland, and Vermont

– Include NH 3 

## emissions. New Jersey

– Develop a method to translate the SCCs that are less than 8 digits reported b y facilities to 8 digit SCCs for reporting in the inventory .

## 32

**CHAPTER III** – **AREA SOURCES A.**  **General Methods for all States 1.**  **What Data Sources Were Used?** Version 1 of the 2002 MANE -VU area source inventory was built on the inventories that the State agencies submitted to EPA from May through July

of 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. Except f or Rhode Island, all of the MANE -VU States also submitted area source inventories to EPA. Rhode I sland elected to use the preliminary 2002 NEI for its area source inventory . The EPA performed some limited QA review of the State inventories to identify fo rmat, referential integrity, and duplicate record issues. The EPA revised the inventories to address these issues and made the files available to the State agencies on August 6, 2004. These inventory files were used as the starting point for the MANE -VU inventory . These inventory files were obtained from EPA, consolidated into a single data set, subjected to extensive QA review, and revised (as approved b y the MANE - VU State agencies) to address QA issues and fill data gaps identified while preparing Vers ion 1. Subsequently, the following agencies provided revisions to their area source inventories:

 Version 2

– District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont.

 Version 3

– Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island. The Version 2 and 3 revisions for these States are discussed in section III.B (State - Specific Methods) of this chapter. In addition, as requested by MANE -VU, revisions were made to Version 3 to (1) add emissions for portable f uel containers (PFCs), industrial adhesives, and outdoor residential wood combustion for some States; (2) decrease the PM2.5 

## emissions for paved and unpaved roads and construction for all States; and (3) remove invalid CE records that originated from the preliminary 2002 NEI for some States. These revisions are explained in section III.A.3 of this chapter.

## 33

To track the origin of data, the temporal period of emissions, and to facilitate generation of emission summaries, the following NIF plus fields were added to the EP, PE, EM, and CE tables:

 Data Source Codes: For the area source inventory data, the data source codes are based on the following 9 - character format: [Data Origin] - [Year] - [Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward] - [PM Augmentation Code] **Code Fiel**  **d Length** Data Origin 1 Year 3 (including leading hyphen) Grown/Not Grown/Carried Forward 2 (including leading hyphen) PM Augmentation 3 (including leading hyphen) **Data Origin Codes** Code Description S State agency- supplied data L Local agency- suppli ed data R Tribal agency- supplied data P Regional Planning Organization E EPA/Emission Factors and Inventory Group (EFIG) - generated data **Year Codes** Year for which data are supplied (e.g., Year = - 02 for 2002), or from which prior year data are taken (e .g., Year = - 99 for 1999; - 01=2001). **Grown/Carried Forward/Not Grown Codes** Code Description

- G Used when emissions in a pre - 2002 inventory are grown to represent 2002 emissions.

- F Used when emissions in a pre - 2002 inventory are carried forward and included in the 2002 inventory

without adjustment for growth.

-X Used when the emissions are not grown or are not carried forward. For

example, X is used when emissions are calculated for the 2002 inventory using 2002 activity, or when data are replaced with 2002 State data.

## 34

**PM Augmentation Codes**

- PA PM Augmented Emissions: Record for PM 10

## /PM2.5 

## emissions that were

updated or added using ad-hoc updates.

- PC PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10

## /PM2.5 

## emissions estimated

using the PM Calcul ator.

- PR PM Augmented Emissions: Record added for PM 10

## /PM2.5 

## emissions estimated

using ratios of PM 10 

## -to - PM or PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## . If PM 10 

## and PM2.5 

## emissions are equal and one of the pollutants is assigned this code, the ratio is assumed to be 1.

 Revisi on Date: This field indicates the month and year during which the last revision was made to a record.

 State FIPS: This field indicates the State FIPS code of the submittal.

 County FIPS: This field indicates the county F IP S code of the inventory . The following NIF plus fields were added to the EM table:

 Emission Ton Value: This field indicates the values of the emissions in tons. This field was used to prepare summaries of emissions on a consistent EU basis.

 Emission Ty

pe Period: This field indicates the period of the Emission Type

– either ANNUAL, SEASONAL, MONTHLY, or DAILY. Emission table records designated as ANNUAL were used to prepare summaries of annual emissions.

 CAP_HAP: This field identifies records for CAP versus records for HAPs . For the MANE -VU inventory, the flag is CAP for all records.

 Year: This field indicates the year of the data; for this inventory, it is 2002. **2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?**  A QAPP was prepared and approved b y MANE - VU/MARAMA and the EPA Regional Office prior to initiating work on Version 1 of the inventory (MANE - VU, 2004a). This QAPP was followed during preparation of all three versions of the inventory . This section provides an overview of the QA checks completed on each version of the inventory . The QA process for each State inventory

involved the following steps that are also included in the following discussion:

 Conduct QA checks on each State inventory ;  Prepare a QA Summary Report for submittal to the agency for review;  Revi se the inventory

to resolve QA issues as directed by the agency;  Repeat the QA checks on the revised inventory to verify that the corrections were completed;

## 35

 Perform augmentation to correct for missing data; and  Repeat the QA checks to verify that the augm entation was completed correctly . **a. QA checks for State emission inventories**  The following QA checks were run on each State inventory :

i. County

and SCC coverage ii. Pollutant coverage iii. EPA QA summaries sent to State agencies iv. Range errors v. PM emissions cons istency and completeness review vi. Control device ty

pe and control efficiency

data review vii. Start and end date checks viii. Annual and daily emissions comparison County and SCC Coverage The county coverage in the State inventories appeared to be reasonable for all S tates. The SCC coverage was difficult to evaluate simply by showing a count of the number of SCCs by State. Each State inventory

was compared to the preliminary 2002 NEI, and area source categories in the NEI but not in a State inventory were sent to each agency for review. Each State agency then selected the NEI categories that were then added to the MANE -VU inventory . Pollutant Coverage The pollutant coverage in the State inventories was complete for all pollutants except for PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## . Diagnosis and resolution of PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## pollutant emissions is discussed later in section III.A.2.c. The exception was Connecticut who included only VOC, NO x 

## , and CO emissions in its inventory submittal to EPA. EPA QA Summaries Sent to State Agencies Under a separate project with EPA, Pechan performed QA review of the State area source inventories. This QA review involved running EPA’s QA program on each data set to identify and resolve QA issues. Using the results of this QA work, Pechan prepared two sets of QA summaries that EPA sent to the State agencies. Pechan contacted each State agency with QA issues identified in the EPA reports to obtain direction for correcting the QA issues identified in the reports. The following explains these two summari es:

## 36

High- level Summary

of State Inventories Submitted to EPA: The first summary

was an Excel workbook file with four spreadsheets that provided the following information:

 2002 Nonpoint File Names: This spreadsheet documented names and formats of the files that EPA received from the State agencies and the dates on which they were transferred to Pechan.

 2002 Nonpoint Summary: This spreadsheet documented the name of the state agency, type of inventory (i.e., CAP, HAP, or both), a comparison of the numb er of the counties in the inventory to the total number of counties in the State to identify the geographic coverage of the inventory, a unique list of CAP codes, and the total number of area source SCCs. This spreadsheet also indicated if any nonroad or onroad emissions data were moved from the agency ’s area source inventory to its nonroad or onroad inventory .  2002 Nonpoint Emission Sums: This spreadsheet summarized emissions by start date, end date, and emission ty pe and assigned the appropriate code to the emission ty pe period NIF plus field.

 2002 Nonpoint Error Summary : This spreadsheet provided a copy of the “SummaryStats” table from the EPA QA program (EPA, 2004a). This table provided the count of records for each NIF 3.0 table and identified the number of records with errors b y type of error. Detailed Summary

of QA I ssues: This summary

(sent to State agencies on August 11) was prepared in a text file that listed by State and NIF table the number of records with errors, and provided correction s for the errors. To support documentation of corrections to some of the errors in the text file, Pechan prepared an Excel workbook file that summarized the following errors and corrections by State: invalid pollutants codes; invalid units; invalid maximum achievable control technology (MACT) codes; and invalid and inactive SCCs. A spreadsheet was also included to show the mapping of standard industrial classification (SIC) codes to North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes. This cro sswalk was used to correct invalid NAICS codes if a valid SIC code was available in the State inventories and vice versa.

## 37

Additional QA for the MANE -VU Area Source Inventory The following explains additional QA and data tracking that was performed for the MANE -VU inventory . The following data elements were reviewed to identify QA issues:

 Range Errors;  PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness;  Control Device Codes and Control Efficiency Values;  Start and End Dates;  Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison; and  Comparison of State Inventories to the 2002 Preliminary NEI. For each State inventory

for which QA issues were identified, a separate QA Summary Report was prepared in an Excel workbook file, and sent to each State agency for review. The State agencies provided directions in the Excel Workbook file, via e -mail, or b y submitting revised records in NIF 3.0 in an Access database to correct the inventories. The QA reports are discussed under section III.A.2.b. Range Errors The EPA’s QA program contains routines that compare annual emission values, numeric fields in the PE and EP tables, and other temporal numeric fields against a range of values. The QA program flags records that are less than or greater than the range of values for review. Pechan summarized the range errors for the State agencies to review and provide corrections. According to EPA, the ranges to which values in inventories are compared represent “normal” ranges that are based on percentiles from previous inventories. The range values are conservative in that EPA wants to identify

suspicious values even though the values may be real (Thompson, 2002). PM Emissions Consistency and Completeness Review The following consistency checks were performed at the EM table data key level ( for annual emissions) to compare PM emissions:

 If an SCC was associated with a PM emission record, but was missing one or more of the following (as appropriate for the SCC [i.e., PM - CON is associated with fuel combustion only]): PM10 - FIL, PM10 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , or PM - CON, the record was flagged for review.

 The following equations were used to determine consistency :

PM10 - FIL + PM - CON = PM10 - PRI PM25 - FIL + PM - CON = PM25 - PRI

## 38

 The following comparisons were made to determine consistency :

PM10 - PRI>= PM10 - FIL PM25 - PRI>= PM25 - FIL PM10 - PRI>= PM - CON PM25 - PRI>= PM - CON PM10 - FIL >= PM25 - FIL PM10 - PRI>= PM25 - PRI If the data failed one of these checks it was diagnosed as an error. If a State agency did not provide corrections to these errors, the errors were corrected/filled in according to an augmentation procedure explained in section III.A.2.c. For information purposes, all PM - PRIand PM - FIL records were flagged to indicate that these pollutants were included instead of, or in addition to, the standard PM10 - PRI/FIL, PM25 - PRI/FIL, and PM - CON pollutants. Control Device Ty

pe and Control Efficiency Data Review The CE codes in the “Primary Device Ty

pe Code” and “Secondary Device Ty

pe Code” fields were reviewed to identify invalid code s (i.e., codes that did not exist in the NIF 3.0 reference table) and missing codes (e.g., records with a null or uncontrolled code of 000 but with control efficiency data). QA review of control efficiency data involved diagnosis of two types of errors. First, records were reviewed to identify control efficiency

values that were reported as a decimal rather than as a percent value. Records with control efficiencies with decimal values were flagged as a potential error (although not necessarily an error, since the real control efficiency may be less than 1%). Records with a 1% control efficiency value were also identified for review by the State agency

to determine if the value was reported as a decimal in its internal data s ystem but rounded to 1% when the data were converted to NIF 3.0. The second check identified records where 100% control was reported in the CE table, but the emissions in the EM table were greater than zero and the rule effectiveness value in the EM table was null, zero, or 100% ( implying 100% control of emissions). Because many agencies did not populate the rule effectiveness field or a default value of zero was assigned, records with null or zero rule effectiveness values were included where the CE was 100% and emissions were greater than zero. For records that met these criteria, Pechan consulted with the State agency to determine if corrections were needed to any of the fields. Start and End Date Checks QA review was conducted to identify start and end date values in the P E and EM tables to confirm consistency

with the inventory

year in the TR table, and to confirm that the end date reported was greater than the start date reported.

## 39

Annual and Daily Emissions Comparison The State inventories were reviewed to determine if any of the following conditions existed:

 Multiple records coded at the SCC level as emission ty pe 30, but with different start and end dates. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or inclusion of both annual and seasonal values.

 Multip le records coded at the SCC level as a daily emission ty pe (27, 29, etc.) but with different start and end dates. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of additional ty pes of daily

emissions.

 Multiple records coded at the SCC level with the same start and end date, but different emission ty

pes. While not a true duplicate, this may indicate an error or just inclusion of additional ty pes of daily emissions.

 Any

“DAILY” type record that was missing its associated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review.

 Any

“DAILY” type record that was greater than its associated “ANNUAL” record was flagged for review. **b. Responses from State Agencies**  QA Summary

Reports were sent to the State agencies to review the QA issues identified . The State agencies were asked to return these reports to MANE -VU with their corrections documented in the reports. These reports were then used to document revisions to the State inventories. The QA Summary Reports containing the revisions provided by the State agencies are provided in Excel Workbook files with this TSD.

**c. Gap Filling and Augmentation**  This section explains the methods used to add data for categories and/or pollutants missing in a State’s inventory

after revising the inventory to address QA issues. i. MANE -VU sponsored inventories ii. PM augmentation iii. Fossil fuel combustion sources iv. Other sources of PM emissions v. Merging of NEI data into S/Linventories vi. Revisions to the preliminary 2002 NEI incorporated into Version 1 of the MANE -VU inventory vii. Additional work on Area source methods

- Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads

- Wildfires and Prescribed Burning

## 40

The following discusses the augmentation procedures that were applied to the State inventories to improve the inventories or to fill in missing data not supplied by the State agencies. MANE -VU - Sponsored Inventories MANE -VU sponsored inventory development for residential wood combustion, open burning, public owned treatment works (POTWs), compositing, and industrial refrigeration. At the beginning of the project for developing Version 1, each State agency was requested to indicate if it (1) included the MANE -VU - sponsored inventory for one or more of these categories in the inventory it submitted to EPA; (2) included its own estimates for a category in the inventory it submitted to EPA; or (3) if it did not include a category in its inventory, if the MANE -VU sponsored inventory

or the 2002 preliminary

NE I should be used as the source of data for the category . The results of this Version 1 inventory development request are summarized in Table III - 1. Improvements to fugitive dust emissions for the paved and unpaved road categories were completed after the draft version of the consolidated area source inventory was prepared. Agencies provided guidance on if they wanted the MANE -VU - sponsored inventory for these two categories to replace the paved and unpaved road inventories they had included in their inventories. For paved roads, all States requested that the MANE -VU - sponsore d inventory be used; however, New Jersey and Maryland requested that the winter-time sand/silt adjustment not be included in their inventories. For unpaved roads, nine of the 12 States requested that the MANE -VU - sponsored inventory be used. New Jersey

re quested that its unpaved road inventory be used instead of the MANE -VU - sponsored inventory . In addition, the District of Columbia and Delaware do not have any unpaved road activity and excluded this category from their inventories. PM Augmentation Pro cedures were developed to estimate missing pollutant data from data provided by the State agencies in order to develop a complete set of PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions to support air quality modeling. The following discusses the procedures for fossil fue l combustion sources first followed b y the procedures for all other area sources of PM emissions. Fossil Fuel Combustion Sources Fossil fuel combustion sources include industrial, commercial/institutional, and residential anthracite coal, bituminous/subb ituminous coal, distillate oil and kerosene, residual oil, natural gas, and LPG. All of these sources emit both filterable and condensible emissions. The QA review of the PM emissions data for these sources focused on verifying that the emissions reporte d in the State inventories included both filterable and condensible emissions. The emissions for these pollutants can be reported in State inventories individually (i.e., as filterable and condensible separately) or as primary emissions (i.e., the sum of the filterable and condensible emissions). The QA review also focused on evaluating the emission factors reported in the State inventories to determine if they were reasonable.

## 41 **Table III -**  **1. Summary of MA NE**  **- VU**  **- Sponsored Inventories Included in Version**  **1 of the A rea**  **Source Consolidated**  **Emissions Inventory** 

**Ar ea Source**  **Category Pollutant**  **SCCs MA** **NE -** **VU Inventory Included in**  **State’s Inventory**

**Submitted to EPA**  **Not Included in State’s Inventory**  **- Ad**  **d to M ANE**  **- VU** 

**Inventory State’s Inventory**  **Includes State**   ** Devel** **oped Estimates Not Included in State’s**  **Inventory -**  **Ad d 2002**  **Preliminary**

**NEI Data to State’s Inventory**  **An nual**  **Summer**

**Day Winter** 

**Day An**  **nual Summer**  **Day Winter** 

**Day An**  **nual Summer**  **Day Winter** 

**Day An**  **nual** 

### POTW s NH 3, VOC 2630020010 (W astewater Treatment) DE, N J, PA DE, NJ, PA VT VT CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, NH, NJ, NY CT, DC, DE,

MA, MD, NH, NJ NJ ME, RI 2630020020 (Biosolids Processes) DE, NJ, PA DE, NJ, PA VT VT CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, NH, NJ, NY CT, DC, DE,

MA, MD, NH, NJ NJ ME, RI 2630050000 (Digested Slu dge) DE, NH, NJ, PA DE, NH, NJ,

PA VT VT CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, NY CT, DC, DE,

MA, MD ME, RI 

### Composting NH 3, VOC 2680001000 (Biosolids) NH, NJ NH, NJ CT, DC, MA, ME, PA, VT CT, DC, MA,

ME, PA, VT 2680002000 (Mixed Biosolids and Green W aste) NH, NJ NH, NJ CT, DC, MA, ME, PA, VT CT, DC, MA,

ME, PA, VT 2680003000 (Composting; Green Wa ste) DC, MA, ME DC, MA, ME 

### Industrial Refrigeration NH 3 2399010000 ME, NH, NJ ME, NH, NJ CT, MA, PA, VT CT, MA, PA,

VT 

### Residential Wo od Combu stion All criteria pollutants/ precursors, and many toxic air pollutants 2104008000

(Indoor) MA, MD,

NH MA, MD,

NH MA, MD,

NH CT, DE,

ME CT, DE, ME CT, DE, ME NJ, NY, VT NJ NJ DC, PA, RI 2104008070 (Outdoor) MA, MD,

NH MA, MD,

NH MA, MD,

NH CT, DE,

ME C T, DE, ME CT, DE, ME 

### Open Burning All criteria pollutants/ precursors, and many toxic air pollutants 2610000100

(Leaves) MA, MD,

NH, PA DC, DE, NY, VT NJ NJ NJ ME, RI 2610000400 (Brush) MA, MD,

PA CT, DC, DE, NY, VT NJ NJ NJ ME, NH, RI 2610030000 (Municipal Solid Wa ste) MA, MD,

PA DC, DE, NY NH, NJ NH, NJ NJ ME, RI, VT 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Wa ste) MA, NY,

PA DC, NY, VT DE, NJ DE, NJ DE, NJ

## Table III **- 1 (continued)** 

42 **Notes:** Gray shading identifies categories for which daily emissions are not available. **POT Ws**  **:** CT, MD: Provided VOC but not NH 3 em issions in its State inventory. DC, MA, MD, ME, NH, RI: Reported POTW emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed). DE: MANE -VU inventory used for NH 3 ; DE provided its own VOC emissions under SCC 2630020000 (Total Processed). NJ: MANE -VU - sponsored inventory used for NH 3 only. NJ included its own inventory for the other criteria pollutants under SCCs 2630010000 and 2630020000. NY: Reported VOC emissions under SCC 2630000000 (from the preli minary 2002 NEI) and SCC 2630020000 (State - developed inventory). MANE -VU - sponsored NH 3 inventory was not used. **Composting:** CT, NH: SCC 2680003000 is not in the MANE -VU - sponsored composting inventory for these States. DE: This State does not have composting activity. MD: State requested that the MANE -VU inventory for this category not be included in its inventory. NY, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in the 2002 inventory. **Industrial Refrigeration:** DC: Requested that t he preliminary 2002 NEI be used but the NEI does not contain any emissions for this category in DC. DE: State - developed emissions are included in point source inventory. MD, RI: Did not include emissions for this category in its inventory. ME: Used the MANE -VU inventory emissions under SCC 2302080002 (Miscellaneous Food and Kindred Products/Refrigeration). NH: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO 2 and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NH 3 em issions for SCC 2 399010000 are from the MANE -VU inventory. NY: Original inventory submittal to EPA includes SO 2 and PM emissions for SCC 2399000000 from the preliminary 2002 NEI; NY did not use the MANE -VU -sponsored NH 3 inventory for SCC

2399010000. **Residential Wood C ombustion:**  DC: R WCinventory in 2002 NEI covers seven SCCs and does not include daily emissions. **Open Burning:** CT: Statewide activity for SCC 2610000100 (Leaves) and SCC 2610030000 (Municipal Solid Waste) is negligible. For SCCs 2610000400 ( Brush) and 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste), State initially provided VOC, NO x , and CO emissions under SCC 2610000000 which is no longer a valid SCC in EPA’s ma ster SCC list. CT recalculated emissions to include VOC, NOx , CO, PM10 - PRI/- FIL, and PM25 - PRI/- FIL, and placed the emissions on valid SCC 2610000500 (Land Clearing Debris) since the majority of the activity is associated with activities covered by this SCC. MD: The MANE -VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard W aste) reports zero emissions indicating that the activity for the category does not occur in MD. MD did not include the SCC in its

inventory for this reason. NH: Did not include NH 3 em issions in MANE -VU inventory for SCC 2610040400 (Municipal Yard Waste).

## 43

To support the QA review effort, the uncontrolled PM emission factors shown in Table III - 2 were compiled from AP - 42. The emission factors reported in the State inventories were compared to the emission factors in this table. Emission factors that appeared too high or too low were flagged for review b y the State agency. In addition, inventory data were flagged for review b y the State agency if the emissions were reported under the primary PM pollutant codes but the emission factors matched with the emission factors for filterable PM in Table III - 2. Finally, if emission factors were not reported in the State agency inventory, the emission factors were back- calculated using the throughput data (if available), emissions, rule effectiveness values, and control efficiency data (if available). The back- calculated emission factors were compared to the factors in Table III- 2 to identify data with major difference between the factors. It is emphasized that the uncontrolled emission factors in Table III- 2 were used as a reference for reviewing State inventory data. The emission factors in this table should not be construed to be the best available for all State agencies since the emission factors will vary depending on the composition of the boiler population in an agency ’s area sourc e inventory . Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Penns ylvania provided their own inventory for all fossil fuel combustion categories. Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont used f ossil fuel combustion inventory data in the preliminary

2002 NEI for some or all of the categories. The following provides details on the origin of the fossil fuel combustion inventories for these States: Connecticut supplied VOC, NO x 

## , and CO emissions from its 1999 inventory for industrial and commercial/institutional fossil fuel combustion. PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , SO 2 

## , and NH 3 

## emissions were taken from preliminary NE I estimates (carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI). For the residential sector, Connecticut’s inventory was taken from the preliminary

2002 NEI. Connecticut provided guidance on the counties with natural gas and LPG activity for which to use the NEI estimates. For the District of Columbia, the preliminary NE I was used to gap fill missing PM10 - PRI and PM25 - PRIemissions for commercial/institutional bituminous/ subbituminous coal combustion and PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , SO 2 

## , and NH 3 

## for commercial/institutional natural gas combustion. The NEI estimates for these commercial/institutional categories were carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. The District of Columbia used the NEI estimates for residential bituminous/subbituminous coal combustion. Maine and Rhode Island used the preliminary 2002 NEI for all three sectors. The NEI estimates for the industrial and commercial/institutional sectors were carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI , while the residential sector estimates are based on 2000 or 2002 activity

estimates prepared by

EPA. Vermont used the preliminary 2 002 NEI for the industrial and commercial/ institutional sectors and residential anthracite coal (carried forward from Version 3 of the 1999 NEI), but provided its own inventory for residential distillate oil, natural gas, and LPG.

## 44

**Table III -** **2. A rea S**  **ource Industrial, Commercial/Institutional, and Residential Fossil Fuel Combustion**

**Uncontrolled Emission Factors for PM10 -**  **PRI/FIL, PM25 -**  **PRI/FIL, and PM -**  **CON**

Pollutant1 Uncontrolled

Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference Industrial Boilers: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2102001000) PM10 - FIL 2.3 x % Ash content

of coal LB TON 30.77 AP -42 Table 1.2 -4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM25 - FIL 0.6 x % Ash content

of coal LB TON 8.03 AP -42 Table 1.2 -4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content (13.38%) (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM - CON 0.08 x % Ash

content of coal LB TON 1.07 AP -42 Tabl e 1.2 - 3 Used formula for SCC 10300101, EF calculated from formula of .08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM10 - PRI LB TON 31.84 PM25 - PRI LB TON 9.10 Industrial Boilers: Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal (SCC 2102002000) PM10 - FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 9 EF (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors) PM25 - FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 9 EF (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors) PM - CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 5 (used Commercial/Institutional emission factors) PM10 - PRI LB TON 14.24 PM25 - PRI LB TON 5.64 Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Distillate Oil (SCC 2102004000) PM10 - FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 6 PM25 - FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 6 PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1 .3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.30 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 1.55 Industrial Boilers: Residual Oil (SCC 2102005000) PM10 - FIL 7.17 x % Sulfur

content of oil LB E3GAL 10.683 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); where A=1.12(S)+ 0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios. PM25 - FIL 4.67 x % Sulfur

content of oil LB E3GAL 6.958 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 5. EF calculated from formula of 7.17(A); where A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios. PM - CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 12.18 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 8.46 Industrial Boilers and IC Engines: Natural Gas (SCC 2102006000) PM10 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM25 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM - CON 5.7 LB E 6FT3 5.7 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM10 - PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25 - PRI 7.6 LB E6FT3 7.60

## Table III **- 2 (continued)** 

45 Pollutant1 Uncontrolled

Emission Factor (EF) EF Numerator EF Denominator Calculated Uncontrolled EF Reference Industrial Boilers - Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2102007 000) PM10 - FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP -42 Table 1.5 - 1 PM25 - FIL 0.6 LB E3GAL 0.6 AP -42 Table 1.5 - 1 PM - CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM - CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for all PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emission factor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane. Reference: AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf for natural gas (AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP -42, Ap pendix A, page A- 5). PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 1.11 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 1.11 Industrial Boilers: Kerosene (SCC 2102011000) PM10 - FIL 1 LB E3GAL 1 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 6 PM25 - FIL 0.25 LB E3GAL 0.25 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 6 PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 6 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.30 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 1.55 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2103001000) PM10 - FIL 2.3 x % Ash content

of coal LB TON 30.77 AP -42 Table 1.2 -4 EF calculated from formula of 2.3 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM25 - FIL 0.6 x % Ash content

of coal LB TON 8.03 AP -42 Table 1.2 -4 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM - CON 0.08 x % Ash

content of coal LB TON 1.07 AP -42 Ta ble 1.2 - 3 Used formula for SCC 10300101, EF calculated from formula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for ash content is EPA, 2002. PM10 - PRI LB TON 31.84 PM25 - PRI LB TON 9.10 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Bituminous and Lignite (SCC 2103002000) PM10 - FIL 13.2 LB TON 13.2 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 9 EF PM25 - FIL 4.6 LB TON 4.6 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 9 EF PM - CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26MMBtu/ton=1.04) PM10 - PRI LB TON 14.24 PM25 - PRI LB TON 5.64 Commercial/Institution al Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2103004000) PM10 - FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 PM25 - FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.13

## Table III **- 2 (continued)** 

46 **Pollutant 1**  **Uncontro lled** 

**Emission Factor (EF)**  **EF Numerator EF Denominator**  **Calculated Uncontrolled EF**  **Reference** Commercial/Institutional Heating: Residual Oil (SCC 2103005000) PM10 - FIL 5.17 x % Sulfur

content of oil LB E3GAL 7.703 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7. EF calculated from form ula of 5.17(A); where A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of calculating EF ratios. PM25 - FIL 1.92 x % Sulfur

content of oil LB E3GAL 2.861 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7. EF calculated from formula of 5.17(A); where A=1.12(S)+0.37; Assumed S=1% for purpose of ca lculating EF ratios. PM - CON 1.5 LB E3GAL 1.5 AP -42, Table 1.3 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 9.20 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 4.36 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Natural Gas (SCC 2103006000) PM10 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM25 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM - CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP -42 Table 1.4 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25 - PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2103007000) PM10 - FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP -42 Table 1.5 - 1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers) PM25 - FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP -42 Table 1.5 - 1 (Propane for Commercial Boilers) PM - CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM - CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for all PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emission factor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane. Reference: AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf for natural gas (AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP -42, Appendix A, page A- 5). PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 Commercial/Institutional Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2103011000) PM10 - FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP) PM25 - FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP) PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP) PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 Residential Heating: Anthracite Coal (SCC 2104001000) PM10 - FIL 10 LB TON 10 EPA, 2002. PM25 - FIL 0.6 x % Ash content

of coal LB TON 8.03 EF calculated from formula of 0.6 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for EF and ash content is EPA, 2002. PM - CON 0.08 x % Ash

content of coal LB TON 1.07 EF calculated from formula of 0.08 * % Ash Content (13.38%). Reference for EF and ash content is EPA, 2002. PM10 - PRI LB TON 11.07 PM25 - PRI LB TON 9.10

## Table III **- 2 (continued)** 

47 **Pollutant 1**  **Uncontrolled**

**Emission Factor (EF)**  **EF Numerator EF Denominator**  **Calculated Uncontrolled EF**  **Reference** Residential Heating: Bitum inous and Lignite Coal (SCC 2104002000) PM10 - FIL 6.2 LB TON 6.2 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 11 PM25 - FIL 3.8 LB TON 3.8 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 11 PM - CON 1.04 LB TON 1.04 AP -42 Table 1.1 - 5 (0.04 lb/MMBtu * 26 MMBtu/ton=1.04) PM10 - PRI LB TON 7.24 PM25 - PRI LB TON 4.84 Residential Heating: Distillate Oil (SCC 2104004000) PM10 - FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 (Commercial/Institutional EF) PM25 - FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 (Commercial/Institutional EF) PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 Residential Heating: Natural Gas - All types (SCC 2104006000) PM10 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4.2 PM25 - FIL 1.9 LB E6FT3 1.9 AP -42 Table 1.4.2 PM - CON 5.7 LB E6FT3 5.7 AP -42 Table 1.4.2 PM10 - PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 PM25 - PRI LB E6FT3 7.60 Residential Heating: Liquified Petroleum Gas (SCC 2104007000) PM10 - FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP -42 Table 1.5 - 1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers; based on EIIP) PM25 - FIL 0.4 LB E3GAL 0.4 AP -42 Table 1. 5 - 1 (Same factor used for Propane for Commercial Boilers; based on EIIP) PM - CON 0.506 LB E3GAL 0.506 Used natural gas PM - CON emission factor of 5.7 lb/Million Cubic Feet (for all PM controls and uncontrolled). Used factor of 0.0887 to convert emission fa ctor from lb/Million Cubic Feet of natural gas to lb/1,000 gallons of propane. Reference: AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2. Conversion factor assumes 1020 Btu/scf for natural gas (AP -42, Table 1.4 - 2) and 90,500 Btu/gallon for propane (AP -42, Appendix A, page A- 5). PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 0.91 Residential Heating: Kerosene (SCC 2104011000) PM10 - FIL 1.08 LB E3GAL 1.08 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP) PM25 - FIL 0.83 LB E3GAL 0.83 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 7 Used EF for Distillate Oi l (per EIIP) PM - CON 1.3 LB E3GAL 1.3 AP -42 Table 1.3 - 2 Used EF for Distillate Oil (per EIIP) PM10 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.38 PM25 - PRI LB E3GAL 2.13 1 PM10 - PRI EF = sum of PM10 - FIL and PM - CON emission factors; PM25 - PRI EF = sum of PM25 - FIL and PM - CON emi ssion factors.

## 48

Revisions to the NEIfor residential LPG and kerosene were completed after the preliminary 2002 NEI was released in February 2004. Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, and Rhode I sland approved replacement of the preliminary 2 002 NEI estimates with the revised estimates for LPG. Connecticut was the only State that elected to use the NEIfor the residential kerosene category, and Connecticut approved replacing the preliminary 2002 NEI for this category with the revised inventory prepared b y EPA. Other Sources of PM Emissions For States that provided only PM10 - FIL and PM25 - FIL emissions, PM10 - PRIemissions were set equal to PM10 - FIL emissions and PM25 - PRIemissions were set equal to PM25 - FIL emissions. The PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions that were added to the inventory were assigned a data source code of S - 02 -X - PR where S - 02 -X represents the code assigned to the PM10 - FIL and PM25 - FIL emissions provided b y the State agency and the “ - PR” indicates that the ratio was applied to estimate the primary emissions (in this case, the ratio of primary to filterable emissions is “1”). PM25 - PRIemissions missing from State inventories were estimated by applying a ratio of PM25 - PRI -to - PM10 - PRIemissions to the PM10 -PRIemissions provide d by the State agency . Table III - 3 identifies the agencies with SCCs for which ratios were applied to estimate PM25 - PRIemissions. This table also shows the ratios and the reference for the ratios.

## 49

**Table III -** **3. SCCs for which PM25 -**  **PRI Emissions were E stimated by**  **A pply**  **ing a Ratio to the PM10**  **- PRI Emissions in the State inventory** 

**SCC SCC Description**  **Agenc y**  **Ratio of PM25**  **- PRI to**  **PM10 -**  **PRI Reference**  2309100010 Industrial Processes: Fabricated Metals:

SIC 34: Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services: Electrop lating NY 0.947 AP -42 emission factors for hard chrome plating tank controlled with mist eliminator. AP -42 (Table 12.20 - 3) shows 94.7% of total PM as less than 2.35 micrometers. Applied factor to State - supplied PM10 - PRI emissions to estimate PM25 - PRI emi ssions. 2461023000 Solvent Utilization: Miscellaneous Non industrial: Commercial: Asphalt Roofing: Total: All Solvent Types MA 1 No data available; assumed PM25 - PRI equals PM10 - PRI. 2601000000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery:

On - site Incineration : All Categories: Total MD, NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25 - PRI equals PM10 - PRI. 2610000100 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery:

On - site Incineration: All Categories: Yard Wa ste - Leaf Species Unspecified NH 1 No data available; assumed PM25 - PRI equals PM10 - PRI. 2810001000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Forest W ildfires: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25 - PRI equals PM10 - PRI. 2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Prescribed Burning for Forest Management: Total MD 1 No data available; assumed PM25 - PRI equals PM10 - PRI. 2810020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Prescribed Burning of Rangeland: Total MD 0.86 Based on ratio of PM25 - PRI to PM10 - PRI for same SCC used by States in 2002 NEI. 28100 30000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Structure Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method. 2810050000 Miscellaneous Area Sources: Other

Combustion: Motor Vehicle Fires: Total MD, NH 0.91 NEI Method. 

## d. **2002 NEI** Merging of NEI Data into State Inventories The area source inventory provided b y each State agency was compared to the 2002 NEI to identify categories in the NEI that were not in each State inventory . The list of categories identified was provided to each State agency and each agency

then selected the NEI categories to be added to its inventory . Identification of categories included in the 2002 NEI but not in a State inventory involved a two - step process. First, Pechan identified the categories in the NEI that did not have an electronic match on the data key of the EM table between the State inventory and the NEI. Then, Pechan manually compared the NEI categories without an electronic match to the State inventory

to identify

and eliminate NEI categories that were in the State inventory but had a different SCC. For example, a State inventory may use a general SCC for a category while the NEI may use different SCCs to breakout emissions at a finer detail. Examples of categories where this typically occurred include the residential wood combustion, open burning of land clearing debris, solvent utilization, and petroleum marketing and transportation categories. In

## 50

addition, if a State agency requested that a MANE -VU - sponsored inventory be added to its inventory, the NEI categories that overlapped with the MANE -VU - sponsored categories were removed from the list of NEI categories considered for incorporation into a State inventory . The source categories in the 2002 NEI that were added to a State inventory can be identified where the data source code starts with “E”. These categories can be identified using the data source code field in the NIF 3.0 files or in the summary of area source emissions that contains the data source code. Revisions to the Preliminary 2002 NEI During preparation of the MANE -VU inventory, EPA completed revisions to the emissions for six categories in the preliminary 2002 NEI released in February 2004. As agreed to with each State agency, the revised emissions were used in the MANE -VU inventory in lieu of the preliminary

2002 NEI emissions if the agency requested that the category be included.

 Non- Residential Construction (SCC 2311020000): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary

2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

 Highway

Constructi on (SCC 2311030000): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary

2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

 Open Burning of Land Clearing Debris (SCC 2610000500): 2002 emissions data replaced data in preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI. The activity

for this category

was based on activity

prepared for the non-residential and highway

construction categories. For 2002, emissions were set to zero for counties with a population that was 80% urban or more based on 2000 C ensus data. This was not done for the 1999 NEI. For the NEI method, it was assumed that highly urban counties do not allow this activity to take place. Note that 2002 emissions data were already included in the preliminary 2002 NEI for the open burning of residential municipal solid waste, open burning of yard waste, and the residential construction categories.

 Residential LPG Combustion (SCC 2104007000): 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary

2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

 Residential Kerosene Combustion (SCC 2104011000): 2000 emissions data replaced data in the preliminary 2002 NEI that were carried forward from 1999 NEI.

 Residential Wood Combustion (SCCs starting with 2104008xxx; 4 SCCs for fireplaces and 3 SCCs for woodstoves): The preliminary 2002 NEI emissions were revised to:

## 51  Correct the CO, PM10 - PRI , and PM25 - PRIemission factors for fireplaces without inserts (this change doubled the emission factors associated with correcting an error in converting the values from g/kg to lb/ton);

 Correct the climate zone map for allocating national activity to States;

 Replace 1997 total residential wood consumption with 2001 estimates (this change reduced wood consumption for fireplaces with inserts and woodstoves);

 Update urban/rural population data to reflect 2002 estimates based on year 2002 total county

population and year 2000 county ratios of urban/rural population to total population; and

 Change the data source code from E - 02 -X (this was incorrect) to E - 01 - X to reflect 2001 activity

data adjusted to 2002. **e. QA Review of Final Inventory**  Final QA checks were run on the revised data set to ensure that all corrections provided by the State agencies were incorporated into the State inventories and that there were no remaining QA issues that could be addressed during the duration of the project. After exporting the inventory in Oracle to an Access database in NIF 3.0, the EPA’s QA program was run on the Access database and the QA output was reviewed to verify that all QA issues that could be addressed were resolved (EPA, 2004a). The output file from the EPA’s QA program run on the area source inventory is provided in an Access 2000 database along with the Access database containing the area source inventory in NIF 3.0. Additional Work on Area Source Methods

 Fugitive Dust Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads Review of Methods This work involved compiling and summarizing information on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE -VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following fugitive dust area source categories: windblown dust, paved and unpaved roads, agricultural tiling and harvesting, and construction activities. A short survey form was prepared and sent to the MANE -VU State agencie s to collect information on whether an agency had activity

for each category during 2002. For each agency for which activity

occurred in its jurisdiction during 2002, information was requested on the methods and data sources it used to prepare its 2002 inventory for each category . This information was used to prioritize the categories (e.g., work on agricultural field burning was eliminated from further consideration if MANE -VU State agencies

## 52

did not have activity

for this category). The methods and data applied b y RPOs other than MANE -VU were obtained from RPO websites and discussions with the RPOs. The results of this review were documented in a technical memorandum (MANE -VU, 2004b). Based on the results of the review, MANE -VU decided to proceed with developing a paved and unpaved road fugitive dust inventory that incorporated improvements to activity data used in the NEI methodology . Methods for Improving Paved and Unpaved Road Fugitive Dust Inventory Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved roads are classified under SCCs 2294000000 and 2296000000, respectively . Fugitive dust emissions from paved and unpaved road traffic were estimated for PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL. Since these categories are not sources of PM - CON, PM10 - PRIemissions are equal to PM10 - FIL emissions and PM25 - PRIemissions are equal to PM25 - FIL. The following provides a summary of the methods. Paved Roads Several changes were made in the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations to improve these estimates over those prepared for EPA’s 2002 NEI. First, the monthly precipitation data representing the number of days in a month with at least 0.01 inches of precipitation were developed at the county level. In comparison, a single monthly precipitation value was used to model an entire State in the 2002 NEI. Thus, the resulting MANE - VU county- specific paved road fugitive dust emission estimates should be more representative of each county than the NEI data since precipitation events can vary significantly from one part of the State to another. The second improvement made to the paved road fugitive dust emission calculations was the use of county and road-ty

pe - specific average vehicle weights. This is an improvement over the NEI where a single average vehicle weight is applied nationwide. Thus, in the MANE -VU inventory, county /road ty pe combinations with significant heavy truck traffic have a higher average vehicle weight and a corresponding emission factor compared to county/road ty pe combinations with primarily lighter vehicle traffic. The final improvement made to the MANE - VU paved road emission calculations was the use of the winter silt loading adjustments. These adjustments account for the application of sand and salt on the roads during month s with frozen precipitation. The 2002 NEI does not include any wintertime silt loading adjustments. The effect of the wintertime silt loading adjustments is an increase in the paved road emission factors during the months in which it is applied. The months during which this adjustment was applied varied by State in the MANE -VU inventory . Unpaved Roads The county- specific precipitation data used in the paved road fugitive dust calculations were also used to improve the unpaved road fugitive dust calculations. As with the paved roads, this represents an improvement over the State - specific precipitation data used in the 2002 NEI

## 53

unpaved road emission inventory . The other improvement made to the unpaved roads was the use of State - supplied unpaved road mileage data by county for Maine.

 Wildfires and Prescribed Burning Review of Methods This work involved compiling and summarizing information on emission estimation methods and data sources from the MANE -VU State agencies, RPOs, and EPA for the following area source categories: wildfires, prescribed burning, slash burning, and agricultural field burning. The approach previously

described for the fugitive dust categories was used to collect and compile data from the MANE -VU State agencies, RPOs other than MANE -VU, and EPA for the fire categories. All of the information collected from these various information sources was summarized in a technical memorandum (MANE - VU, 2004c). Results of Methods Review MANE -VU recognized the need to improve the metho ds for estimating emissions for the fire categories. The most important revision would be to inventory fire events as point sources rather than as area sources at the county- level. However, due to resource constraints, it was decided not to pursue improvements to the methods for estimating emissions from the fire categories. It should be noted that during this project, some of the MANE -VU States provided revisions to their wildfire and prescribed burning inventories to add PM25 - PRIemissions and to improve the spatial allocation of activity data at the county level. These improvements were incorporated into the MANE -VU area source inventory .

**3. Version 3 Revisions**  The following explains revisions to Version 3 that applied to several or all of the MANE -VU States. Gap Filling In Version 2 of MANE - VU’s inventory, emissions for PFCs, industrial adhesives, and residential outdoor wood burning existed for some States but were missing for other States. Since these are categories for which SIP rules may b e developed, it was determined that emissions for these categories should be added to Version 3. The following provides a summary of the Version 3 revisions to address missing data concerns for these categories:

 PFCs: MANE -VU estimated default 2002 emis sions for these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with this TSD .

## 54

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE -VU’s default inventory which was added to Version 3. Massachusetts elected to use the per capita emission factor but provided revisions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissions to counties, and then allocated emissions between the commercial (16%) and residential (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls" provided with this TSD.

 Industrial Adhesives: Emissions for industrial adhesives were missing in Version 2 for Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. MANE -VU estimated default 2002 emissions for these States using a per capita emission factor and county population data for each State. The derivation of the emission factor, population data, and calculation of annual and daily VOC emissions for industrial adhesives is provided in an Excel file named “PFC_Adhesive Calcs for 2002_022106.xls” along with this TWD . Massachusetts elected to use MANE -VU’s gap - f illing inventory

which was added to Version 3. The rest of the States elected to use EPA’s 2002 inventory which is based on a top - down, mass balance methodology where national industrial adhesive solvent estimates were allocated to counties using industri al employ ment. The EPA estimates were adjusted to remove uncontrolled VOC emissions included in the final 2002 point source NE I. The point- source adjustments were conducted at the county level. Note that the point- source - adjusted emissions for Rhode I sl and are zero for all three counties. Note New Jersey

is the only

State that prepared its own 2002 inventory for this category that is included in Version 3. The industrial adhesive inventory data for the rest of the MANE -VU States originates from the 1 999 NEI. These States were contacted to determine if they

wanted the 1999 data replaced with the default estimates or with the EPA’s 2002 inventory

for industrial adhesives. Maine commented that the 1999 estimates are more realistic of the solvent emissi ons for their State than the 2002 NEI or MANE -VU default estimates. The other States did not indicate that they wanted their data replaced. Therefore, the 1999 NEI data for Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont was not changed in Vers ion 3 of MANE - VU’s inventory .  Residential Wood Burning: Residential outdoor wood burning emissions were missing in Version 2 of the MANE - VU inventory for the District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. In Versions 1 and 2, New Jerse y’s and New York’s emissions for outdoor wood burning were included with their inventory for indoor wood burning. The District of Columbia, Rhode Island, and Vermont elected to use MANE -VU’s outdoor wood burning inventory

which was added to Version 3. In addition, per direction provided b y New Jersey, its wood burning inventory was replaced with the MANE -VU sponsored indoor wood burning inventory in Version 3, and the MANE - VU outdoor wood burning inventory

was added to Version 3.

## 55

New York’s inventory in Version 2 included emissions for both residential indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided revisions that lowered its overall emissions relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory to show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separately. New York also added NH 3 

## emissions to its inventory for Version 3. Adjustments to PM2.5 

## Emissions for Fugitive Dust Categories In formation developed by the Western Governors’ Association, Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Dust Emissions Joint Forum and EPA indicates that, for paved and unpaved roads and the construction nonpoint source categories, the PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratio is lower than the ratio used in the EPA method to estimate PM25 - PRI/- FIL emissions from PM10 - PRI/ - FIL emissions (WRAP, 2005). Therefore, for the final 2002 NEI , EPA applied an adjustment factor to the PM25 - PRI/ - FIL emissions to correct for overestimates of PM25 - PRI/- FIL emissions for these categories. Because the PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratio used for the MANE -VU States is based on the EPA method, this information was communicated to the MANE -VU States and all of the States agreed that these adjustments should be made to the MANE -VU inventory . Table III - 4 identifies the categories to which this adjustment was applied, the old and new PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratios, and the adjustment factors applied to the PM25 - PRI/ - FIL emissions in Version 3 of MANE -VU’s inventory . Note that these adjustments to PM 2.5 

## emissions were applied prior to applying the transport adjustment factors for PM 10 

## and PM2.5 

## emissions. The modelers applied the transport adjustment factors to the mass emissions in Version 3. Documentation of the file containing the transport adjustment factors is provided under “Speciation Profiles” section of Table VII- 1 in Chapter VII. For the construction categories, the EPA assumed an original PM2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratio of 0.15 and an adjustment factor of 0.67. However, the original PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratio used for both the NEI method and MANE -VU's inventory for construction is 0.2. Based on discussions with EPA, the goal is to revise the original PM 2.5 

## emissions such that the PM 2.5 

## -to - PM 10 

## ratio is 0.1. Therefore, for Version 3 of MANE - VU's 2002 area source inventory, an adjustment factor o f 0.5 (ratio of 0.1 -to - 0.2) was applied to adjust the PM 2.5 

## emissions. Note that based on Pechan’s discussions with EPA during the week of March 6, 2006 concerning the application of the paved road PM2.5 

## adjustment factor, it was determined that adjusting the emissions by

applying the factor (shown in Table III - 4) to the PM 2.5 

## emissions is a simplistic approach. The EPA noted that it is evaluating this issue and will be issuing guidance in the near future for revising the equation for estimating PM 2.5 

## emissions which, when applied, will likely yi eld different results. Because EPA was unable to provide guidance on how to address this issue before Version 3 needed to be completed during the week of March 6, the adjustment factor shown in Table III - 4 was a pplied to the PM 2.5 

## emissions for paved roads because this adjustment will provide a better estimate of PM2.5 

## emissions than the unadjusted emissions.

## 56

**Table III -** **4. Revisions to PM25 -**  **PRI and PM25 -**  **FIL Emissions for Paved and**

**Unpaved Roads and Constr uction** 

**SCC SCC Description**  **Original PM**  **2.5 -** **to -**  **PM 10**  **Ratio Revised** 

**PM 2.5**  **- to**  **- PM**  **10 Ratio**  **Ad justment** 

**Factor 1,2**  2294000000 Mobile Sources : Paved Roads : All Paved Roads :

Total: Fugitives 0.25 0.15 0.6 2296000000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : All Unpaved

Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67 2296005000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Public Unpaved

Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67 2296010000 Mobile Sources : Unpaved Roads : Industrial

Unpaved Roads : Total: Fugitives 0.15 0.1 0.67 2311000000 In dustrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

All Processes : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50 2311010000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Residential : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50 2311010040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Residential : Ground Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50 2311020000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50 2311020040 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Ground Excavations 0.2 0.1 0.50 2311030000 Industrial Processes : Construction: SIC 15 - 17 :

Road Construction : Total 0.2 0.1 0.50
1 For these categories, filterable and primary emissions are equal because they are not sources of condensible emissions . The adjustment factor was applied to both the PM25 -PRI and PM25 - FIL emissions and emission factors in the MANE -VU inventory. 2 See text for discussion of issue concerning the adjustment factor for paved road PM2.5 emissions. Also, for construction, see text for explanation of PM 2.5 adjustment factor shown in this table. 

## Removal of Invalid CE Records For the following SCCs, Version 2 contained invalid CE records for Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont that were removed in Version 3: SCC SCC Description 2311020000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Industrial/Commercial/Institutional : Total 2311030000 Construction: SIC 15 - 17 : Road Construction : Total 2610000100 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Leaf Species Unspecified 2610000400 Open Burning : All Categories : Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 2610030000 Open Burning : Residential : Household Waste 

## The CE records all originate from the preliminary 2002 NEI that have been removed from the final 2002 nonpoint NEI . They are invalid because they

have a control efficiency value of 100% and corresponding records in the EM table with rule effectiveness and rule penetration values of 100% (implying that the emissions are zero), but with emissions greater than zero. The Excel spreadsheet file named “CE_records_removed from V3.xls” provides the CE records b y State and county F IP S, SCC, and pollutant code that were removed in Version 3.

## 57 **4. Version 3 Emissions**  **Summary** Table III - 5 presents a State - level summary of the annual area source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE -VU inventory . Note that PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions are included in the inventory

for all SCCs for which State agencies reported any form of PM, PM 10 

## , and/or PM 2.5 

## emissions. If an agency

did not report PM10 - PRIand/or PM25 - PRIbut reported PM - PRI , PM FIL, PM - CON, PM10 - FIL, and/or PM25 - FIL, the PM augmentation procedures discussed in the TSD were applied to the form of PM emissions supplied by the agency

to calculate emissions for the other forms of PM emissions. If an agency reported PM10 - PRIand/or PM25 - PRIemissions but not PM10 - FIL, PM25 - FIL, or PM - CON emissions, the agency's inventory was not augmented to calculate filterable or c ondensible emissions. Note that PM - CON is associated with only fuel combustion sources. For NH 3 

## , the area source inventory includes emissions for natural sources for the following States: SCCs 28060xxxxx for domestic cats and dogs in Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Jersey ; 28070xxxxx for wild animals in Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York; and SCC 2810010000 for human perspiration in Delaware, Massachusetts, and New Jersey . The area source inventory also includes NH 3 

## biogenic emissions (SCC 2701420000) for Massachusetts. **Table III -** **5. Version 3 2002 MA NE**  **- VU**  **Ar ea Source Emissions by State (Tons/Year)**  **State CO**  **NH 3**  **NO x**  **PM10 -**  **FIL PM10**  **- PRI**  **PM25 -** 

**FIL PM25**  **-**

**PRI PM**  ****

**CON SO**  **2 VOC**  Connecticut 70,198 5,318 12,689 37,790 48,281 4,038 14,247 846 12,4 18 87,302 Delaware 14,052 13,279 2,608 12,910 13,039 3,075 3,204 128 1,588 15,519 District of Columbia 2,300 14 1,644 5,745 6,293 507 1,029 147 1,337 6,432 Maine 109,223 8,747 7,360 155,237 168,953 19,090 32,774 686 13,149 100,621 Maryland 141,178 25,8 34 15,678 31,116 95,060 3,375 27,318 611 12,393 120,254 Massachusetts 136,552 18,809 31,358 150,046 192,839 23,354 42,067 1,156 54,923 162,016 New Hampshire 79,647 2,158 10,960 32,138 43,328 6,688 17,532 449 7,072 65,370 New Jersey 97,657 17,572 26,692 37,282 61,601 2,811 19,350 476 10,744 167,882 New York 356,254 67,422 98,803 288,991 369,595 30,894 87,154 102 130,409 507,292 Pennsylvania 266,935 79,911 47,591 363,173 391,897 51,792 74,925 266 63,679 240,785 Rhode Island 8,007 883 3,886 7,090 8,295 8 87 2,064 336 4,557 31,402 Vermont 43,849 9,848 3,208 51,392 56,131 6,729 11,065 180 4,087 23,265 **MA NE**  **- VU**  **1,325,853 249,795**  **262,477 1,172,909**  **1,455,311 153,243**  **332,729 5,383**  **316,357 1,528,141** 

## 58

**B. State -**  **Specific Methods** For each of the MANE - VU States, this section identifies the temporal basis of the emissions included in Version 3 and discusses revisions incorporated into Version 3. In addition, this section also discusses the origin of each State agency ’s emissions included in Version 3. Fo r each agency, a table is provided in Appendix B that lists the data source codes by SCC, emission ty pe period, and pollutant. In addition, an electronic folder is provided for each State agency containing the QA Summary Reports prepared for Versions 1, 2 , and/or 3 and other files documenting revisions included in Versions 2 and 3. Except for Rhode Island, a QA Summary Report was prepared for Version 1. Subsequently, a QA Summary Report was prepared for States that provided Version 2 or 3 revisions. Rho de Island elected to use EPA’s draft 2002 NEI for Versions 1 and 2 but provided revisions for Version 3; therefore, a QA Summary Report is available for Version 3 only for Rhode Island. **1. Connecticut**  Table III - 6 shows the emission ty pe periods for whi ch Connecticut provided emissions. **Table III -** **6. Connecticut 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table B - 1 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Connecticut provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Connecticut elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives. Connecticut elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emis sions for indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;  Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFC s; and  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI. For Connecticut, these emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EP A or carried forward

## 59

from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI. Data carried forward from the 1999 NEI originate from either State data included in the 1999 NEI or EPA data developed for the 1999 NEI.

**2. Delaware**  Table III - 7 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Delaware provide d emissions. **Table III -** **7. Delaware 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types Emission**  **Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe Emission** 

**Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20020831 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20020101 20020831 27 ANNUAL 20020512 20020512 30 DAILY 20020512 20020512 27 ANNUAL 20020629 20020629 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 ANNUAL 20021029 20021029 30 DAILY 20020629 20020629 27 ANN UAL 20021104 20021104 30 DAILY 20021029 20021029 27 ANNUAL 20021205 20021205 30 DAILY 20021104 20021104 27 DAILY 20021205 20021205 27 

## Table B - 2 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Delaware provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3, and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI or MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the remaining categories. Delaware elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives, and prepared its own inventory for PFCs. Delaware elected to use data from MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in Delaware);  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for POTWs; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 60 **3. District of Columbia**  Table III - 8 shows the emission ty pe periods for which the District of Columbia provided emissions. **Table III -** **8. District of Columbia 2002 A rea**  **, Version 3:**

**Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 

## Table B - 3 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. The District of Columbia provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3. The District of Columbia provided annual VOC emissions for PFCs for Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. The District of Columbia elected to use the EPA’s 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and indoor wood burning. The exception is for the following categories for which the District of Columbia elected to use data from MANE -VU - sponsored inventories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - F IL emissions for paved roads (note: there are no unpaved roads in the District of Columbia);  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories. **4. Mai** **ne** Table III - 9 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Maine provided emissions. **Table III -** **9. Maine 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 DAILY 20020601 20020929 29

## 61

Table B - 4 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Maine provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. Maine’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Maine provided annual and daily VOC and annual NH 3 

## emissions for industrial wastewater treatment that were added to Version 3. Maine elected to use data from MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM1 0 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs; and  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting. **5. Maryland**  Table III - 10 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Maryland provi ded emissions. Table B 5 in Appendix B identifies the data sources b y SCC, emission ty pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. **Table III -**  **10. Mary land 2002 A** **rea, Version 3: U**  **nique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types Emission**  **Ty pe**  **Period Start Date**  **End Date Emission**  **Ty pe**  **Emission**

**Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 SEASONAL 20020401 20020930 30 M ONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 SEASONAL 20020401 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 SEASONAL 20020601 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 DAILY 20020101 20021231 29 MONTHLY 20020601 200206 30 30 DAILY 20020401 20020930 29 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 DAILY 20020401 20021031 29 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

## Maryland provided 2002 annual, seasonal, and daily emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for industrial adhesives and commercial cooking. Maryland prepared its own inventory for PFCs. Maryland elected to use data from MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

## 62

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories; and  Annual and monthly

NH 3 

## emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers. For Version 2, Maryland provided revisions to annual, seasonal, and daily VOC emissions for SCC 2505030120 (Storage and Transport : Petroleum and Petroleum Product Transport : Truck : Gasoline). Maryl and also removed PM10 - FIL and PM25 - FIL annual, seasonal, and daily records for open burning of land clearing debris (SCC 2610000500). Maryland had revised the PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIemissions in an earlier version of the MANE -VU inventory but not the PM10 - FIL and PM25 - FIL. As a result of revising the primary emissions, the filterable emissions were no longer met the consistency check as compared to the primary emissions. QA of PM emissions in Version 3 identified one record for Maryland in county 510 for SCC 2801000003 (Agriculture - Crops : Tilling) where PM10 - PRIannual emissions are 2317.2 tons and PM25 - PRIannual emissions are 0 tons. For the other counties in Maryland with this SCC, PM25 - PRIemissions are about 20% of the PM10 - PRIemissions. This is sue was not addressed due to time and resource constraints for completing revisions to Version 3.

**6. Massachusetts**  Table III - 11 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Massachusetts provided emissions. **Table III -**  **11. Massachusetts 2002 A rea, Version**  **3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table B - 6 in Appendix B i dentifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Massachusetts provided 2002 annual and daily emissions for the majority of the area source categories in Version 3 and used 2002 data that EPA prepared for the draft 2002 NEI for residential coal combustion, asphalt roofing, and agricultural livestock (NH 3 

## ).

## 63

Massachusetts elected to use data from MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the foll owing source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily VOC emiss ions for industrial adhesives and PFCs;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes;  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories. For Version 2, Massachusetts revised annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for the following categories: aircraft refueling, surface coating, degreasing, miscellaneous nonindustrial: consumer and commercial products and pesticides, and gasoline service stations (stage 1: balanced submerged fill). Massachusetts also revised annual and daily emissions for 14 counties for forest wildfires, revised annual emissions for four counties for residential open burning o f brush using the correct rule penetration factors for the counties, and revised control efficiency and control device data for selected categories in the CE table. For Version 3, Massachusetts revised annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 countie s for auto refinishing. In the CE table, Massachusetts changed control device code 102 (low- solvent coatings) to 000 (uncontrolled) and associated control efficiency values were set to null for all counties. Massachusetts also added annual and summer day VOC emissions for 14 counties for gasoline service stations (stage 2: displacement loss/controlled). For PFCs, Massachusetts elected to use the per capita emission factor but provided revisions to the population data, used 2002 owner occupied units to allocate the emissions to counties, and then allocated emissions between the commercial (16%) and residential (84%) sectors. Massachusetts’ calculations are provided in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named MA_AR_QA_Report_03 0806.xls".

**7. New Hampshire**  Table III - 12 shows the emission ty pe periods for which New Hampshire provided emissions. Table B - 7 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. New Hampshire provided 2002 emissions for many of the area source categories in Version 3. New Hampshire’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI.

## 64 **Table III -**  **12. New H ampshire 2002 A** **rea, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 MONTHLY 2002090 1 20020930 30 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

## New Hampshire elected to use data from MANE - VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - P RI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs;  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting;  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories; and  Annual and monthly

NH 3 

## emissions for agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI; these emissions are either based on 2002 data prepared by EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI . New Hampshire provided revis ions to Version 2 that were kept in Version 3. For Version 2, New Hampshire revised annual and daily VOC emissions for the gasoline storage and transport sector to reflect revisions it made to the 2002 inventory that EPA prepared for the 2002 NEI. The categories revised include bulk plant breathing losses, gasoline service stations (stages 1 and 2 total and underground tank breathing and emptying losses), and gasoline tank trucks.

## 65 **8. New Jersey**  Table III - 13 shows the emission ty pe periods for which New Jersey provided emissions. **Table III -**  **13. New Jersey 2002 A** **rea, Version 3: Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20 011201 20020228 29 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table B - 8 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counti es b y SCC. New Jersey

provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories. New Jersey provided its own 2002 inventory for industrial adhesives and PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE VU - sponsored inventories. New Jersey elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for indoor and outdoor residential wood combustion (replacing New Jersey ’s indoor residential wood combustion inventory provided in Versions 1 and 2);  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved roads;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs; and  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting. For Version 3, New Jersey added annual and summer day VOC emissions for 21 counties for SCC 2501060100 (gasoline service stations : stage 2: total). The emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named "NJ_AR_QA_Report_ 030806.xls". New Jersey provided 2002 emissions data for the industrial adhesives and PFC categories in Version 1. For Version 2, New Jersey corrected PM25 - PRIemissions that were greater than PM10 - PRIemissions for SCC 2601000000 (on- site incineration : all categories : total). **9. New York**  Table III - 14 shows the emission ty pe periods for which New York provided emissions. Table B 9 in Appendix B identifies the data sources b y SCC, emission ty pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SC C. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination or

## 66

because emissions are not reported for all pollutants for the s ame SCC and emission ty pe period combination. **Table III -**  **14. New York 2002 A rea, Version 3:** 

**Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20 020131 30 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 MONTHLY 20020601 20020630 30 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 MONTH LY 20021001 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

## New York provided revisions to annual emissions for all 62 counties for the categories and pollutants shown in Table III - 15. This revision completely replaced the 2002 emissions that New York provided in Version 2. Table III - 15 also identifies categories and pollutants for which emissions were added to Version 3 (i.e., not in Version 2). The emissions are summarized in the spreadsheet named "Version 3 Revisions" in the Excel file named NY_AR_QA_Report_030806.xls". New York’s inventory

in Version 2 included emissions for both residential indoor and outdoor wood burning. For Version 3, New York provided revisions that lowered its overall emissions relative to Version 2 and broke out its inventory to show emissions for fireplaces, woodstoves, and outdoor equipment separately . New York also added NH 3 

## emissions to its inventory for Version 3. New York’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. New York provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE -VU sponsored inventories. New York elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for agri cultural livestock; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 67

A QA issue that may

affect the use of the MANE - VU inventory for air quality

modeling and revisions to the projection year inventory is the addition of SCCs 2103004001 and 2103004002 by New York that are not in EPA’s master SCC list used by the EPA QA program. These SCCs are defined in Table III - 15. In addition, the QA program shows SCCs for PFCs and outdoor wood burning as invalid becaus e EPA has not updated the master list to include these SCCs for the EPA QA program. These SCCs were included in Version 2 and should have been assigned speaciation profiles and included in the projection year inventory prepared from Version 2.

## 68

**Table II I**  **- 15. Summary of New** **York's Revisions to Version 3 of MA NE**  **- VU's A** **rea Source Inventory SCC**  **SCC Description Pollutant**  **Ty pe of Revision to Emissions**  **Revisions to Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery : Wastewater Treatment**  2630020000 Public Owned : Tota l Processed VOC Revised emissions for all pollutants **Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential : Wood**  2104008001 Fireplaces: General VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added NH3, revised emissions for rest of pollutants 210400 8052 Non - catalytic Woodstoves: Low Emitting VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants 2104008070 Outdoor W ood Burning Equipment VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants **Revisions to Stationary**  **Source Fuel Combustion : Electric Utility** 2101001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI No change to emissions 2101002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2101004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2101005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2101006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants **Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Com**  **bustion : Industrial** 2102001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI No change to emissions 2102002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revi sed emissions for all pollutants 2102004000 Distillate Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2102005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2102006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2102007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2102008000 Wo od : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI No change to emissions 2102011000 Kerosene : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, P M25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants **Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Commercial/Institutional**  2103001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI No change to emissions 2103002000 Bitumi nous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2103005000 Residual Oil : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollut ants 2103004000 Residual Oil : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Removed and replaced with data for SCCs 2103004001 and 2103004002 2103004001 Distillate Oil : Boilers VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Adde d emissions for all pollutants 2103004002 Distillate Oil : IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants 2103006000 Natural Gas : Total: Boilers and IC Engines VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emiss ions for all pollutants 2103007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2103008000 Wo od : Total: All Boiler Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revis ed emissions for all pollutants 2103011000 Kerosene : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants

## 69

**Table III -**  **15. Summary of New York's Revisions to Version 3 of MA**  **NE -** **VU's A rea Source Inventory**  **(Continued) SCC**  **SCC Description Pollutant**  **Ty pe of Revision to Emissions**  **Revisions to Stationary Source Fuel Combustion : Residential**  2104001000 Anthracite Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI No change to emissio ns 2104002000 Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2104004000 Distillate Oil : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Rev ised emissions for all pollutants 2104006010 Natural Gas : Residential Furnaces VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2104007000 Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) : Total: All Combustor Types VOC, NOX, CO, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Revised emissions for all pollutants 2104011000 Kerosene : Total: All Heater Types VOC, NOX, CO, NH3, SO2, PM10 - PRI, PM25 - PRI Added emissions for all pollutants

## 70 **10. Pennsylvania**  Table III - 16 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Pennsylvania provided emissions. **Table III -**  **16. Pennsy lv** **ania 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types Emission**  **Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe Emission** 

**Ty pe**  **Period Start** 

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 200 20101 20021231 30 MONTHLY 20020101 20020131 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 MONTHLY 20020201 20020228 30 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 MONTHLY 20020301 20020331 30 MONTHLY 20020401 20020430 30 MONTHLY 20020501 20020531 30 MONTHLY 20020601 20020 630 30 MONTHLY 20020701 20020731 30 MONTHLY 20020801 20020831 30 MONTHLY 20020901 20020930 30 MONTHLY 20021001 20021031 30 MONTHLY 20021101 20021130 30 MONTHLY 20021201 20021231 30 

## Table B - 10 in Appendix B identifies the data sources b y SCC, emission ty pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Note that some SCC and emission ty pe period combinations are listed more than once because the data source codes are different for more than one SCC and emission ty pe period combination. Pennsylvania provided 2002 emissions for the majority of the area source categories. Penns ylvania provided its own 2002 inventory for PFCs and residential indoor wood burning . Penns ylvania’s inventory for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EPA or EPA data carried forward from f inal Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE -VU - sponsored inventories. Pennsylvania elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and agricultural crop fertilizers and livestock;  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for POTWs and composting; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 71 **11. Rhode Island**  Table III - 17 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Rhode Island provided emissions. **Table III -**  **17. Rhode Island 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Types**

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table B - 11 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Rhode I sland provided 2002 annual VOC emissions for several solvent utilization categories (surface coating, degreasing, graphic arts, rubber/plastics, and industrial adhesive); annual and daily VOC emissions for petroleum and petroleum product storage (gasoline service stations and all transport ty pes); and annual VOC emissions for POTWs. Rhode I sland’s indoor wood burning inventory

originates from the draft 2002 NEI. Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE -VU - sponsored inventories. Rhode I s land elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;  Annual PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads; and  Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs.

## 72 **12. Vermont**  Table III - 18 shows the emission ty pe periods for which Vermont provided emissions. **Table III -**  **18. Vermont 2002 A rea, Version 3:**  **Unique List of Start Date, End D ate, and Emission Types** 

**Emission Ty** **pe Period**  **Start**

**Date End Date**  **Emission Ty** **pe** ANNUAL 20020101 20021231 30 DAILY 20011201 20020228 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 27 DAILY 20020601 20020831 29 

## Table B - 12 in Appendix B identifies the data sources by SCC, emission ty

pe period, and pollutant in the Version 3 area source inventory . This table also shows the number of counties by SCC. Vermont provided 2002 annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, PM10 - PRIor PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI or PM25 - FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for residential fuel combustion (distillate oil, natural gas, LPG, and indoor wood burning); annual VOC emissions for gasoline service stations and breathing losses at bulk terminals; annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for residential open burning; annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , and PM25 - PRIemissions for forest fires, and annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, PM10 - PRI, and PM25 - PRIemissions for structure fires. Vermont’s inventory

for industrial adhesives originates from the 1999 NEI. For Version 2, Vermont provided revisions to EPA’s draft 2002 inventory for SCC 2501050120 (bulk stations and terminals : breathing loss : gasoline) to incorporate the effects of vapor balance controls not accounted for in the EPA estimates. The revised inventory for this category was added to Version 2 (and kept in Version 3) that did not include this category . Control records were added to the NIF 3.0 CE table for the counties with vapor balance controls. In addition, Vermont provided emissions for three counties (i.e., county FIPS codes 50015, 50017, and 50019) that were not in EPA's inventory . Emissions for the remaining area source categories were taken from the draft 2002 NEI (that are either based on 2002 data prepared b y EPA or EPA data carried forward from final Version 3 of the 1999 NEI) or MANE -VU - sponsored inventories. Vermont elected to use MANE -VU - sponsored inventories for the following source categories:

 Annual and daily VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## emissions for outdoor wood burning;  Annual P M10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , and PM25 - FIL emissions for paved and unpaved roads;  Annual and daily NH 3 

## emissions for industrial refrigeration processes and POTWs;  Annual and daily VOC emissions for PFCs;  Annual and daily VOC and NH 3 

## emissions for composting; and  Annual VOC, NO x 

## , CO, NH 3 

## , PM10 - PRI , PM10 - FIL, PM25 - PRI , PM25 - FIL, and SO 2 

## emissions for open burning categories.

## 73

**C. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  This section provides a summary of potential revisions to incorporate into future versions of the MANE -VU area source inventory . All States

– A coordinated effort between the State agencies should be developed to apply consistent methods to avoid having to apply procedures to augment inventory data to correct for the QA issue s and fill in missing data as discussed previously in this chapter. For example, this will ensure that consistent methods are applied across State agencies to ensure consistent and accurate reporting of source categories using the same SCCs across States, PM emissions, and minimize other QA issues that were identified during the development of Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the inventory . For PM emissions, the State agencies should develop and apply a consistent method for including condensible emissions for f uel combustion sources that can be applied when the agencies develop their inventories. This may include compiling the emission factors for all forms of PM into one database, organized by SCC and control ty

pe (for filterable emissions), and sharing the database among the MANE -VU State agencies. Use of a consistent set of emission factors will help to avoid the PM consistency issues identified in Versions 1, 2, and 3 of the MANE -VU inventory

as well as ensure that condensible emissions are included in the primary emissions reported in the inventory . State - specific suggestions are as follows: Delaware: Revise the residential wood combustion emissions inventory with the latest revisions sponsored b y MARAMA. Rhode I sland: This State felt that the area s ources (from the nonpoint inventory EPA prepared) which they

had changed to zeros in Version 3 would revert back to the Version 2 numbers which were from the EPA report. Rhode I sland would like to see this change in the next version of the inventory . (Ta

ble with changes can be received upon request). New Jersey :  Why is the EPA VOC emission factor for fireplaces completely out of proportion with the other emission factors? The ratio of conventional wood stoves/fireplaces = 0% to 10% for other pollutants and is 77% for VOC. It is discussed in the Pechan Technical Memo #5, 9/3/03, page 19, how a study of the accuracy

of the emission factors showed the VOC should be more like 10 to 30 lb/ton, instead of 229 lb/ton and the woodstove emission factors (certified) should be higher than Emission Inventory Improvement Program guidance.

 The summer seasonal adjustment factors for indoor wood burning used in the model appear high. This combined with the very high VOC emission factor results in high ozone season wood burning emissions.

## 74

 In general, the accuracy of the very

large residential wood burning numbers, all pollutants.

 The large fugitive dust inventory numbers don not correlate to dust found in monitors, even with the latest 30% to 40% reduction in pave d and unpaved road emissions.

 We need consistent guidance from the EPA for adhesives and sealants, PFC, and commercial cooking.

## 75

**CHAPTER IV** – **NONROAD SOURCES A.**  **General Methods for all States** This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in preparing the 2002 nonroad sector inventory for the MANE -VU States. The nonroad sector is comprised of nonroad engines included in EPA’s NONROAD model, as well as other engines not modeled in NONROAD, including aircraft, commercial marine vessels and locomotives.

**1. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Data sources used for the various nonroad categories are described below.

**a. Aircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Categories**  As a starting point, aircraft, commercial marine vessel and l ocomotive inventories were prepared using the inventories that State agencies submitted to the EPA in June 2004 as a requirement of the CERR. In addition, some States provided data directly to MANE -VU for use in this inventory that were not submitted for the CERR. Missing data were supplemented with estimates from EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. For the aircraft and commercial marine vessel source categories, the 2002 NEI CAP emissions were estimated by

carrying over the 2001 estimates. 2001 emissions were estimated using the methodologies described in EPA’s Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessel, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory (EPA, 2003b). The 2002 locomotive emissions were calculated using 200 2 activity data and the methodologies described in the EPA, 2003b documentation. Table IV - 1 provides a summary of the aircraft, commercial marine, and locomotive emission SCCs reported in the MANE -VU inventory . Table IV - 2 provides a summary of the basis for these nonroad subsector emissions by State.

## 76

**Table IV -**  **1. List of Unique A ircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive SCCs Reported by**  **States in MA NE**  **- VU Inventor** **y SCC**  **SCC Description 1 SCC Description 2**  **SCC Description 3 SCC Description 4**  2275000000 Mobile Sources Aircraft All Aircraft Types and Operations Total 2275001000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Military Aircraft Total 2275020000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Commercial Aircraft Total: All Types 2275050000 Mobile Sources Aircraft General Aviation Total 2275060000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Air Taxi Total 2275070000 Mobile Sources Aircraft Aircraft Auxiliary Power Units Total 2280000000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial All Fuels Total, All Vessel Types 2280002000 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, C ommercial Diesel Total, All Vessel Types 2280002010 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Ocean - going Vessels 2280002020 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Harbor Vessels 2280002100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Dies el Port emissions 2280002200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Diesel Underway emissions 2280003100 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Port emissions 2280003200 Mobile Sources Marine Vessels, Commercial Residual Underway emission s 2285000000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment All Fuels Total 2285002000 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total 2285002005 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Total Line Haul Locomotives 2285002006 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Class I Operations 2285002007 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Class II / III Operations 2285002008 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Passenger Trains (Amtrak) 22850020 09 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Line Haul Locomotives: Commuter Lines 2285002010 Mobile Sources Railroad Equipment Diesel Yard Locomotives

## 77

**Table IV -** **2. Summary of Basis for 2002 MA NE**  **- VU A**  **ircraft, Commercial Marine, and Locomotive Inventory Basis for Subsector of Nonroad Inventory**  **FIPSST State**  **Aircraft Commercial Marine Vessels**  **Locomotives** 09 Connecticut 2002 Preliminary NEI 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in March 2006 10 Delaware June 2004 CERR Submittal; State supplied revision s in Sep 2004 June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal 11 District of Columbia Not supplied by State and not available from NEI 2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal 23 Maine State supplied in Oct 2004 State supplied in Oct 2004 State su pplied in Oct 2004 24 Maryland June 2004 CERR Submittal; State supplied revisions in Sep 2004 June 2004 CERR Submittal; State supplied revisions in Oct 2004 June 2004 CERR Submittal 25 Massachusetts June 2004 CERR Submittal State - supplied for June 2004 C ERR Submittal, with revisions as directed by State June 2004 CERR Submittal 33 New Hampshire June 2004 CERR Submittal 2002 Preliminary NEI June 2004 CERR Submittal 34 New Jersey June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal June 2004 CERR Submittal 36 New York 2002 Preliminary NEI State supplied in Oct 2004 2002 Preliminary NEI 42 Pennsylvania State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004 State supplied to Pechan in June 2004; State supplied revisions in Aug 2005 44 Rh ode Island State - supplied for June 2004 CERR Submittal, with revisions as directed by State State - supplied for June 2004 CERR Submittal, with revisions as directed by State State - supplied in Oct 2004 50 Vermont 2002 Preliminary NEI Not supplied by State a nd not available from NEI Not supplied by State and not available from NEI

## 78 **b. NONROAD Model Categories**  NONROAD model categories include equipment such as recreational marine and land-based vehicles, farm and construction machinery, and lawn and garden e quipment. Aircraft ground support equipment (GSE) and rail maintenance equipment are also included in NONROAD. These equipment are powered b y diesel, gasoline, compressed natural gas (CNG) and LPG engines. EPA released a final version of NONROAD during December 2005 called NONROAD2005 (EPA, 2005a). To reflect the updates made to EPA’s final NONROAD model, all MANE -VU Version 2 NONROAD model estimates were replaced with updated NONROAD2005 emission estimates. EPA also released an updated version of its NMIM, which incorporates the final NONROAD2005 model. EPA’s NMIM2005 is a consolidated modeling s ystem that incorporates the NONROAD and MOBILE models, along with a county database of inputs (EPA, 2005b). The NMIM county database contains monthly input data to reflect countyspecific fuel parameters and temperatures. Because incorporating revised monthly inputs for use in NMIM2005 is more efficient than preparing county- specific monthly option files needed to run NONROAD2005 independently, Pechan use d NMIM2005 for most MANE -VU States. The two exceptions were for the District of Columbia and Maine due to the differences in oxygenated fuel inputs used for NMIM versus NONROAD. As a first step, Pechan compiled fuel input data avail able from NMIM2005 by county and b y month for all MANE -VU states for 2002. Pechan developed a spreadsheet that summarized the gasoline RVP, gasoline weight percent oxygen, and gasoline and diesel sulfur content proposed as inputs to the updated runs. Values consistent with State - supplied MOBILE6 inputs used for the development of 2002 MANE -VU highway vehicle inventories were presented for use where they differed from NM IM. Pechan requested that States confirm the use of these data for the NONROAD model r

uns, or provide alternative inputs. The final county, monthly NMIM inputs provided or confirmed b y the States for RVP, weight percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur are presented in Appendix C, Table C - 1. Pechan used NMIM’s 2002 default value for nonroad diesel sulfur content. This value is 2,457 parts per million (ppm) for land-based equipment, and 2,767 ppm for recreational marine, for all MANE -VU counties. Pechan also requested that States provide any local activity data in the format of updated NONROAD external data files. These include data files which specify activity parameters such as equipment populations, equipment annual hours of use, county allocation factors, and monthly allocation profiles. Pechan updated the NMIM county database for 2 002 to add in new gasoline profiles to reflect the monthly

and county fuel input values provided by States. Pechan also updated the NMIM county database to cross reference the State - supplied NONROAD data files that replaced default

## 79

NONROAD2005 inputs. Pe chan then ran NMIM/NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0.

**c. NONROAD2005 Model Runs**  The majority

of the model runs were performed using NMIM2005. NM IM and NONROAD have differences in the required format of the oxygenated fuel inputs. For NONROAD, this variable is required to be expressed as a composite weight percent oxygen that accounts for the market share and the percent oxygen of all contributing oxygenates. Since NMIM models HAP emissions, the volume percent and market share of each of four oxygenates must be entered as fuel inputs. These oxygenates include methyltertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), ethanol (ETOH), and tertiary amylmethyl ether (TAME). In cases where only one known oxygenate is present, this is straightforward to reflect in NMIM, as weight percent can be easily

converted to volume percent. However, two States (the District of Columbia and Maine) provided a composite weight percent value for more than one oxyg enate, but could not provide the corresponding volume percent and market share for each oxygenate to use in NMIM. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 for both the District of Columbia and Maine so that their submitted values for weight percent oxyg en could be used directly . The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM2005 were used to calculate average monthly

temperature inputs to NONROAD for both States. Pechan developed monthly NONROAD option files and ran these f iles through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory . Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions.

**2. What Quality Assurance Steps Were Performed?**  The final MANE -VU nonroad inventory was comprised of emission estimates that were either: 1) submitted by

States for the June 2004 CERR submittal or as additional revisions after this date; 2) developed using NONROAD model inputs provided or approved by States; or 3) reported b y EPA in the preliminary 2002 NEI. As such, the QA steps were tailored to each of these ty pes of submittals. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE -VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all three versions of the MANE -VU inventory .

**a. Summary of QA checks for State emission submittals**  Nonroad emission submittals were accepted as part of the June 2004 CERR submittals to EPA or as direct submittals to MANE -VU. Upon receipt of an emissions submittal, Pechan prepared spreadsheets providing a unique list of errors identified by running the EPA NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the nonroad source inventory (EPA, 2004a). Notes were provided to identify the NIF 3.0 tables in which the errors appeared, as well as clarification as to where an error occurred (e.g., for what SCC and pollutant). For many of the errors, Pechan provided a potential correction, and S tates indicated whether they agreed with the correction, or provided their own

## 80

instructions for correcting the error. These spreadsheets served to document each state's direction on how to correct errors and the state's representative authorizing the correction. The list of general QA checks include the following:

• Duplicate records (i.e., only one record allowed for each unique county/ SCC/ pollutant) • Invalid record ty

pe • Mandatory

field is not populated • Invalid field length • Invalid data type (e. g., invalid SCCs or pollutants) • “Out- of

- range” emission values • Referential integrity (i.e., the presence of widow or orphan records in the NIF 3.0 relational tables) Note that EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool also checks for other specific QA issues by field not listed above. See EPA’s User Guide, Appendix A for a listing of all potential errors that are checked b y the program, and EPA’s guidance for how they should be resolved. Pechan also performed other general QA procedures outside of EPA’s NIF 3. 0 QA software tool, including pollutant augmentation, SCC reconciliation, and completeness and reasonableness checks. Pechan performed pollutant augmentation in cases where the complete set of CAPs and NH 3 

## were not provided b y a State. For example, several States did not provide PM25 - PRI , but did provide PM10 - PRI , so that PM25 - PRIwas estimated using EPA-published particle - size multipliers. Where multipliers were not available from EPA documentation, Pechan used available pollutant emission estimates reported b y all other MANE -VU States to develop “emission ratios” for a given SCC. These “emission ratios” were then used to multiply available pollutant estimates to estimate values for the missing pollutants. Specific values used for a given State and S CC are cited in the “State - Specific Methods” section below. In addition, SCC assignments were reviewed and reassigned after clarification from States as to what the specific SCC estimate represented. For example, a State may have reported all aircraft activity under one of the specific aircraft ty pe SCCs (e.g., commercial or general aviation), when it should more accurately be reported under the general SCC 2275000000 (All Aircraft Types and Operations). Finally, completeness checks were performed on the inventory to determine that emissions for nonroad categories known to operate in a State or county were being reported. Note that emissions may

not be reported for all NONROAD SCCs for all counties in the MANE -VU RPO, and will depend on the geographic allocation methods used by the model, or specific allocation data provided b y a State. NONROAD model category estimates originally

provided by

States for the June 2004 submittal were replaced b y emission estimates developed using NMIM/NONROAD 2005. As such, this

## 81

TSD will not document corrections made b y Pechan to these original NONROAD model estimates, since they

were replaced for Version 3. **b. Data input summary spreadsheets for State review**  As mentioned above for NONROAD model categories, Pechan prepared the MANE -VU emission estimates using EPA’s final NMIM/NONROAD2005 model. An important QA step in running NONROAD is to ensure that the inputs used for fuel specifications and temperatures for a given county and month in 2002 are representative. As such, Pechan compiled the RVP, percent oxygen, and gasoline sulfur inputs reported by NMIM2005 b y county and month for States to review. If a State had previously submitted input data for the MANE -VU onroad inventory, these data were proposed in lieu of NMIM data. States either confirmed use of the default NMIM/onroad MANE -VU inputs, or provided alternate data in the specified format to replace the proposed inputs. Pechan updated the gasoline table in the NMIM county database to add in new gasoline prof

iles to reflect revised fuel input values provided by States. These profiles were then cross -referenced to the appropriate county and month in a separate table called countyyearmonth . Pechan performed QA checks of these NMIM county database tables for each State to ensure that the correct fuel data were input by county and b y month as requested b y the State. **c. QA of final mass emissions**  After performing QA of the inputs, Pechan ran NMIM/NONROAD2005 at the county and monthly level for 2002 and generated the results in NIF 3.0. As a QA step, Pechan ran EPA’s NIF 3.0 QA software tool on the NIF 3.0 files. Errors identified were resolved and checked to ensure they

were corrected in the final files. As part of final processing of the inventories, and to as sist in tracking revisions and preparing emission summaries, Pechan added the following NIF plus fields to each table: TblCE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblEM : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date, CAP/HAP, Year, Emission Ton Value, Emission Ty pe Period TblEP : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblPE : State FIPS, County FIPS, Data Source, Revision Date TblTR : State FIPS, County FIPS, Revision Date Data source codes are included to document the origin of the emissions data, which assists in tracking and quality- assuring revisions made to the emission estimates. Table IV- 3 provides a listing of the data source codes included in the MANE -VU nonroad inventories, as well as a definition of each code . State FIPS and County FIPS are separated out to assist in developing area- specific emission summaries, and the Emission Ton Value places all emissions on the same basis. The Emission Ty

pe Period describes the temporal basis of the estimates (in this case, they are all annual). Finally, the Revision Date tracks when record- specific changes are made.

## 82 **Table IV -** **3. Data Source Code Descriptions Data**  **Source Code**  **Description** E - 02 - F E = EPA- generated data; - 02 = year 2002; - F = emissions are carried forward for inclusion in

the 2002 base year E - 02 -X E = EPA- generated data; - 02 = year 2002; - F = emissions are not grown or carried forward P - 02 -X P = RPO - generated data; - 02 = year 2002; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward S - 02 -X S = State data; - 02 = year 2002 data; -X = emissions are not grown or carried forward



## 3. **Version 3 Emission Summaries** Table IV - 4 presents a summary of the annual 2002 nonroad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE -VU State, as well as a regional total. These emissi ons include SCCs for all NONROAD model engines, as well as aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories, where applicable, for each State. Table IV- 5 presents the emission results for NONROAD model equipment only, while Table IV- 6 provide s emission estimates for aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive categories separately . **Table IV -** **4. A nnual 2002 Nonroad Sector Emissions by**  **MA NE**  **- VU State**  **(Tons/Year) State**  **CO NH**  **3 NO**  **x PM10**  **- PRI**  **PM25 -**  **PRI SO**  **2 VOC**  Connecticut 276,773.0 16.6 25,46 0.2 1,952.1 1,793.9 2,087.4 33,880.2 Delaware 68,782.0 5.2 16,226.5 1,021.4 925.6 3,983.3 8,010.1 District of Columbia 18,844.7 2.4 3,571.3 310.2 298.7 375.4 2,072.5 Maine 153,423.6 11.4 9,820.4 1,436.8 1,329.4 916.8 31,144.1 Maryland 437,400.3 28.2 37 ,472.2 4,936.0 4,357.1 7,941.6 56,330.4 Massachusetts 461,514.3 28.2 42,768.5 3,531.2 3,226.4 3,791.2 56,748.5 New Hampshire 130,782.2 9.1 9,912.1 1,057.8 965.4 891.0 22,376.5 New Jersey 704,396.4 43.0 63,479.0 5,495.1 4,997.2 15,686.0 83,918.9 New Yor k 1,233,968.3 79.3 109,878.3 9,605.3 8,820.9 12,919.7 157,611.7 Pennsylvania 931,978.0 55.0 103,824.2 9,737.9 8,440.1 7,915.0 102,331.0 Rhode Island 73,012.7 4.1 5,001.5 500.2 443.1 377.2 7,779.7 Vermont 62,248.1 4.5 4,217.1 529.9 485.8 372.1 10,547.6 **Total MANE -** **VU 4,553,123.5**  **286.9 431,631.3**  **40,113.9 36,083.6**  **57,256.6 572,751.3** 

## 83

**Table IV -** **5. A nnual 2002 NONROA** **D2005 Model Emissions by MA**  **NE -** **VU State (Tons/Year)**  **State CO**  **NH 3**  **NO x**  **PM10 -**  **PRI PM25**  **- PRI**  **SO 2**  **VOC** Connecticut 274,387.6 16.6 17,897.0 1,712.9 1, 577.6 1,376.6 33,519.0 Delaware 65,954.1 4.9 5,798.3 570.4 525.1 513.0 7,530.5 District of Columbia 18,774.9 2.4 3,066.4 298.4 287.8 341.3 2,052.9 Maine 148,555.3 11.4 8,228.9 1,204.2 1,135.1 771.8 30,741.0 Maryland 424,776.8 28.2 27,789.1 3,118.7 2,87 0.4 2,569.2 53,035.0 Massachusetts 448,398.7 28.2 30,046.7 2,887.2 2,658.8 2,428.1 54,835.8 New Hampshire 128,571.5 9.1 8,149.5 946.8 871.7 672.7 22,237.8 New Jersey 692,547.9 43.0 43,515.2 4,285.4 3,950.5 3,524.9 81,900.4 New York 1,219,308.7 79.3 78, 648.3 8,338.9 7,677.1 6,966.3 155,475.1 Pennsylvania 903,167.7 55.0 62,265.2 6,281.5 5,784.3 5,292.4 99,240.9 Rhode Island 71,573.1 4.1 4,563.9 402.8 371.1 335.5 7,698.7 Vermont 61,732.1 4.5 4,169.9 517.6 476.6 367.6 10,520.4 **Total MANE -** **VU 4,457,748.6**  **286.6 294,138.2**  **30,564.8 28,186.1**  **25,159.4 558,787.4** 



## Table IV **- 6. A** **nnual 2002 A ircraft, Commercial Marine, and**  **Locomotive Emissions**  **by MA**  **NE -** **VU State (Tons/Year)**  **State CO**  **NH 3**  **NO x**  **PM10 -**  **PRI PM25**  **- PRI**  **SO 2**  **VOC** Connecticut 2,385.4 0.0 7,563.2 239.2 216.4 71 0.8 361.2 Delaware 2,827.9 0.3 10,428.2 451.1 400.5 3,470.3 479.6 District of Columbia 69.7 0.0 505.0 11.8 10.9 34.1 19.7 Maine 4,868.3 0.0 1,591.5 232.6 194.3 145.0 403.1 Maryland 12,623.5 0.0 9,683.2 1,817.3 1,486.7 5,372.3 3,295.4 Massachusetts 13, 115.6 0.0 12,721.7 644.0 567.6 1,363.1 1,912.7 New Hampshire 2,210.7 0.0 1,762.5 111.0 93.7 218.3 138.6 New Jersey 11,848.5 0.0 19,963.9 1,209.7 1,046.7 12,161.1 2,018.6 New York 14,659.6 0.0 31,230.0 1,266.4 1,143.8 5,953.4 2,136.6 Pennsylvania 28,810 .2 0.0 41,559.0 3,456.4 2,655.8 2,622.7 3,090.2 Rhode Island 1,439.6 0.0 437.6 97.4 72.1 41.7 81.0 Vermont 516.0 0.0 47.3 12.2 9.2 4.5 27.2 **Total MANE -** **VU 95,374.9**  **0.3 137,493.1**  **9,549.1 7,897.4**  **32,097.3 13,963.9** 

## 84

**B. State** **- Specific Methods**  The following sections describe the methods used and QA issues addressed for each MANE -VU State in developing Version 3.0 of MANE -VU’s nonroad sector inventory .

**1. Connecticut**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan ran EPA’s NMIM2005 to generate NONROAD model S CC emission estimates. Pechan incorporated Connecticut- supplied data for gasoline sulfur content and RVP into the NMIM database. Pechan used NMIM defaults for diesel sulfur content and for weight percent oxygenate values. The final input data by county and by

month are summarized in Table B - 1. Aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions are based on the preliminary 2002 nonroad NEI. In March 2006, Connecticut provided county- level emission estimates for VOC, NO x 

## , and CO for all line -haul and switchyard locomotive SCCs.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  For commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000), PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIwere not reported in the EPA’s NEI. For completeness, Pechan estimated PM10 - PRIemissions by applying an average PM1 0 - PRI/NO x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO x 

## emissions. Commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemissions were estimated by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versio** **ns?** Because EPA’s NEI does not include locomotive category emission estimates for Connecticut, and since Connecticut only provided emission estimates for VOC, NO x 

## , and CO, estimates are still missing for PM10 - PRI , PM25 - PRI , and SO 2 

## .

**2. Delaware**  **a. Wha** **t Data Sources Were Used?** Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Delaware approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. The final fuel input data by county and b y month are summarized in Table B - 1. Delaware provided updated files listed in Table IV- 7 to replace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for five nonroad categories, and a revised equipment population file with updated populations for specific SCCs.

## 85 **Table IV -** **7. Delaware NONROA D External Data Files**  **County NR File Name File Type**  10000air.alo County allocation for airport GSE 10000gc.alo County allocation for golf carts 10000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden 10000log.alo County allocation for logging 10000rvp.alo County allocation for land - based recreational 10000.pop Equipment population 

## Pechan used Delaware’s June 2004 CERR submittal as the basis for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel category estimates in the 2002 MANE -VU inventory . i. Wha t Revisions Were Requested by State? In September 2004, Delaware provided corrections to the general aviation emissions (SCC 227505000) for all pollutants for Kent County to add in general aviation activity at Dover Air Force Base. **b. What QA Issues we** **re Identified and Addressed?** Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y Delaware. Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) included emission estimates for all pollutants except PM25 -PRI . Pechan calculated commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM10 - PRIis PM25 - PRI(ERG, 2004).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**3. District of Columbia**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan developed NONROAD Model SCC emissions for District of Columbia using NONROAD2005. NONROAD2005 was used directly instead of NMIM2005 to incorporate State - supplied weight percent oxygen data. The District of Columbia also requested changes to the default NMIM RVP and gasoline values for some months. The final fuel input data by county and by month are summarized in Table B - 1. The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan developed monthly NONROAD2005 option files for the District of Columbia. Pechan ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory . Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and NONROAD2005 fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 

## emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 

## per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 

## per gallon fuel for diesel engines.

## 86

The District of Columbia provided locomotive emissions for their nonroad sector June 2004 CERR submittal. **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y the District of Columbia. PM emissions in the inventory were not identified as either PM 10 

## or PM2.5 

## , nor were the emissions identified as primary or filterable. The District of Columbia authorized Pechan to change PM to PM10 - PRI . Locomotive PM25 - PRIemissions were estimated using the assumption that 90 percent of PM 10 

## is PM2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b). Hydrocarbon (HC) pollutant emissions were also removed from the inventory, as this is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0. P echan added commercial marine vessel emissions from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. There are no aircraft emission estimates in the NEI for the District of Columbia, since there are not airports located in the District of Columbia.

**c. What Issues Need**  **to be Addressed in Future Versions?** None identified b y the State.

**4. Maine**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions using NONROAD2005. For Maine, weight percent oxygen values were submitted based on actual fuel survey results by

county and by month, but Maine had not tracked the corresponding oxygenate volume percent and market share. As such, Pechan used NONROAD2005 so that Maine’s values for weight percent oxygen could be reflected. Maine also provided revisions to the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reported in NMIM2005. Pechan developed NONROAD2005 monthly option files for two county groups in Maine that shared values for all three fuel inputs (see Appendix C, Table C - 1). The 2002 minimum, maximum, and average hourly temperatures included in NMIM were used to calculate average monthly

temperature inputs to NONROAD. Pechan ran the option files through NONROAD2005 to generate monthly emissions that were then summed to develop an annual 2002 inventory . Pechan performed additional calculations using NMIM emission factors and fuel consumption to calculate NH 3 

## , since NONROAD does not calculate NH 3 

## emissions. NMIM reports NH 3 

## emission factors of 116 grams NH 3 

## per gallon gasoline for gasoline engines, and 83 grams NH 3 

## per gallon fuel for diesel engines.

## 87 i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? In October 2004, Maine provided aircraft, commercial marine vessel, and locomotive SCC emissions to be added to their inventory . Commercial marine emissions submitted by Maine only represented in-port emissions. Diesel and residual commercial marine underway emissions (SCCs 2280002200 and 2280003200) were based on EPA’s 2002 preliminary NEI. **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  PM25 - PRIestimates were missing f rom all aircraft SCC records provided by Maine. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25 - PRIemissions by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by

a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemiss ions were estimated b y multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004). In-port commercial marine emissions (SCC 2280002100) were missing estimates for PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRI . Pechan estimated PM10 - PRIemissions by applying a PM10 - PRI/NO x 

## emission ratio of 0.042 to available NO x 

## emissions. PM25 - PRI emissions were estimated by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.92 (EPA, 2003b).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None i dentified b y the State.

**5. Maryland**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to prepare NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Maryland reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revisions to the input values for RVP and weight percent oxygen for all months. Maryland requested that a value of 2.1 percent oxygen be used for all counties and months. This weight percent value was then converted to a volume percent of 11.8 percent for use in NMIM, assuming MTBE was the only oxygenate. In addition, gasoline sulfur content revisions were incorporated into NMIM for select counties for the months of April through September. The final fuel input data b y county and b y m onth are summarized in Table B - 1. Maryland also provided updated files listed in Table IV - 8 to replace the default files used in NMIM. These included county allocation files for several nonroad categories. **Table IV -** **8. Mary land NONROA**  **D External Data Files County NR File Name**  **File Type** 24000pop.alo County allocation for severa l nonroad categories (population) 24000con.alo County allocation for construction 24000hou.alo County allocation for lawn & garden

## 88

Pechan used Maryland’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE -VU inventory for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? In September 2004, Maryland provided revised aircraft and commercial marine vessel emission estimates. Pechan replaced the aircraft and commercial marine vessel emissions from their CERR submittal with the revised emissions.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y Maryland. Maryland did not provide PM25 - PRIaircraft emis sions in their inventory . Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25 - PRIemissions by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by

a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). Commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemissions were estimated by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**6. Massachusetts**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Massachusetts reviewed the NMIM inputs and approved of the fuel input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur content. NMIM2005 reported a weight percent oxygen of 2.1 percent for all months for all counties in Massachusetts, and the State requested a value of 1.5 percent be used for all counties from October through April. This weight percent value was then converted to a volume percent of 8.4 percent for use in NMIM, given that MTBE was the only oxygenate. Final fue l input data by

county and b y month are presented in Table B - 1. Massachusetts provided annual emissions for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal. These inventories included all CAP.

i. Wha t Revisions Were Requested by State? Massachusetts requested that Pechan incorporate revisions supplied for annual emissions for inport diesel commercial marine (SCC 2280002010) for Dukes County (25007).

## 89 **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Address** **ed?** Pechan changed the aircraft SCC “2275050000” to “2275000000,” since Massachusetts verified that this emission record represents all aircraft typ es, not just general aviation.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified by

the State. **7. New Hampshire**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Hampshire reviewed and approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B - 1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Pechan used New Hampshire’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the MANE -VU aircraft and locomotive inventory . Pechan added commercial marine vessel emissions from the preliminary

2002 Nonroad NEI. **b. What**  **QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?** Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y New Hampshire. New Hampshire did not provide PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## aircraft emissions in their inventory . New Hampshire authoriz ed Pechan to develop aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft ty pes b y applying an average PM10/NO x 

## emission ratio to the aircraft NO x 

## emissions in their inventory . The PM 10

## /NO x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25 - PRIemissions by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25 - PRI emissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM 10 

## is PM2.5 

## (ERG, 2004).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**8. New Jersey**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New Jersey approved of the default fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B - 1 for a summary of the final fuel input data b y county and month. New Jersey provided an updated data input file

## 90

containing revised equipment populations (34000.pop) for specific SCCs for the NMIM model runs. Pechan used New Jersey ’s nonroad sector CERR submittal as the basis for the aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories. These inventories included all CAPs.

**b. What QA Is** **sues were Identified and Addressed?** Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y New Jersey . The only QA issue identified was the inclusion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 

## ) in the inventory, which is not a valid pollutant code in NIF3.0, so these records were removed.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**9. New York**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. New York reviewed the default NMIM inputs and provided revisions to the input values for RVP and gasoline sulfur for all months. New York also requested revisions to weight percent oxygen values for all counties and months. These weight percent values were then converted to a volume percent for use in NMIM, based on MTBE as the only oxygenate for all counties, with the exception of four counties. These included Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, and Niagara counties, which use ETOH as the oxygenate. The f inal fuel input data b y county and b y month are summarized in Table B - 1. For the aircraft and locomotive categories, Pechan used emissions reported in the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? In October 2004, New York provided commercial marine vessel emissions to be added to their inventory . New York did not provide PM - 2.5 commercial marine vessel emissions for some counties in their inventory . Pechan estimated the commercial marine vessel PM25 - PRI emissions from PM10 - PRIusing the assumption that 92% of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b).

## 91 **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIwere not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan e stimated PM10 - PRIemissions by applying a PM10 - PRI/NO x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO x 

## emissions for this SCC. Commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemissions were estimated by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 20 04).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**10. Pennsylvania**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Pennsylvania approved of the fuel input s provided, which were based on the onroad MOBILE6 inputs. Since these differed from the values in NMIM2005, Pechan updated the NM IM profiles accordingly. See Table B - 1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by county and month. Pennsylvania provide d one county allocation file for the lawn and garden category (42000hou.alo) to replace the default file used in NMIM. Pennsylvania submitted an aircraft, locomotive, and commercial marine vessel emissions inventory to MANE -VU after the CERR submittal date.

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? In August 2005, Pennsylvania provided Pechan with county- level updates to SCC 2285002006 (Line Haul Locomotives: Class IOperations) emissions for all pollutants. Pechan updated all emission records for this SCC in Pennsylvania's inventory .

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Pennsylvania authorized Pechan to remove the CO 2 

## emission records from their inventory . In addition, the following data augmentation was performed to add missing SCCs and pollutants. Pennsylvania did not provide commercial aircraft emissions in their inventory . Pechan added commercial aircraft emissions from the 2002 preliminary NEI to Penns ylvania’s inventory . Pennsylvania did not provide PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIaircraft emissions in their inventory . Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft types b y applying an average PM 10

## / NO x 

## emission ratio to Pennsylvania’s available aircraft NO x 

## emissions. The PM 10

## /NO x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25 - PRIemissions by multiplying PM10 - PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For commerci al aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25 - PRIemissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (ERG, 2004).

## 92

Pennsylvania also did not provide SO 2 

## general aviation and air taxi emissions in the inventory. Pechan estimated the SO 2 

## emissions by applying a SO 2

## /NO x 

## emission ratio to the general aviation and air taxi NO x 

## emissions, using ratios of 0.154 and 0.095, respectively .

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**11. Rhode Island**  **a. What Data Sources Were**  **Used?** Pechan used NM IM2005 to generate NONROAD model SCC emission estimates. Rhode Island approved of the fuel inputs used in NMIM2005. See Table B - 1 for a summary of the final fuel input data by

county and month. Rhode I sland provided a revised equipment population file (44000.pop) with updated populations for specific SCCs to replace the default file used in NMIM. Rhode I sland provided emissions for aircraft, locomotive and commercial marine vessel categories for their nonroad sector CERR submittal .

i. What Revisions Were Requested by State? Rhode I sland provided updates in September 2004 to their county- level railroad equipment emissions. The new emissions fall under SCC 2285002005 and replace all line haul locomotive emissions provided in the ir CERR submittal. Emission estimates for yard locomotives were also provided (SCC 2285002010).

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Pechan performed QA of the file, and revised the file to address QA issues as approved b y Rhode I sland. PM 1 0 

## was not identified as either primary or filterable. Rhode Island authorized Pechan to change it to PM10 - PRI . To avoid double counting, Pechan removed the following SCCs from Rhode I sland’s inventory: 2275000000, 2280002000, 2280002020, 2280003000, and 2280003020. These emissions are accounted for under more specific SCCs for aircraft, and more aggregate SCCs for commercial marine. Rhode I sland did not provide PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIaircraft emissions in their inventory . Pechan developed aircraft PM 10 

## emissions for all aircraft types b y applying an average PM 10

## / NO x 

## emission ratio to the aircraft NO x 

## emissions in their inventory . The PM 10

## /NO x 

## ratios used were 3.819 for military

and air taxi, 3.642 for general aviation, and 0.058 for commercial aircraft. Pechan estimated general aviation, military aircraft, and air taxi PM25 - PRIemissions by multiplying PM10 - PRI emissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.69 (EPA, 2003b). For

## 93

commercial aircraft, Pechan estimated PM25 - PRIemissions using the assumption that 97.6% of PM 10 

## is PM 2.5 

## (ERG, 2004). Rhode I sland did not provide yard locomotive, and commercial marine vessel PM25 - PRI emissions in their inventory . Pechan estimated the yard locomotive PM25 - PRIemissions from PM10 - PRIusing the assumption that 9 0% of PM 10 

## is PM25 (EPA, 2003b). Pechan estimated the commercial marine vessel PM25 - PRIemissions from PM10 - PRIusing the assumption that 92% of PM 10 

## is PM2.5 

## (EPA, 2003b).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**12. Vermont**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Pechan developed NONROAD model SCC emissions for Vermont using NMIM2005. Vermont approved of the default fuel input values used in NMIM2005 for weight percent oxygen, but requested that the RVP and gasoline sulfur values reflect values used for onroad mobile source emissions. Pechan added aircraft emissions for Vermont from the preliminary 2002 Nonroad NEI. **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Commercial aircraft (SCC 2275020000) emissions for PM10 - PRIand PM25 - PRIwere not reported in the EPA’s preliminary 2002 NEI. Pechan estimated PM10 - PRIemissions by applying an average PM10 - PRI/NO x 

## emission ratio of 0.058 to available NO x 

## emissions. Commercial aircraft PM25 - PRIemissions were estimated by multiplying PM10 - PRIemissions by a particle size multiplier of 0.976 (ERG, 2004).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  Note that there are no locomotive or commercial marine vessel emissions in the NEI for Vermont. Where activity for any of these SCCs occurs in Vermont, these categories are not represented in the State’s inventory .

## 94

**CHAPTER V** – **ONROAD SOURCES A.**  **General Methods for All States** This section provides an overview of the data sources and QA steps used in prep aring the 2002 onroad sector inventory

for the MANE -VU States and in preparing the corresponding modeling inputs for the MANE -VU Version 3 modeling inventory . The onroad sector is comprised of all motorized vehicles that travel on the public highways including passenger cars, light- duty trucks, minivans, sport utility

vehicles, heavy- duty trucks, and buses. It should be noted that, unlike the other emission sectors, the modeling inventory inputs for the onroad sector do not include any emissions data. The primary modeling inputs for the onroad sector instead are the activity inputs (vehicle miles traveled (VMT)) and SMOKE - formatted MOBILE6 input files. The SMOKE model then generates full MOBILE6 input files using the MOBILE6 inputs, speed inputs, and meteorological inputs for the episode(s) to be modeled, runs the MOBILE6 emission factor model to calculate the appropriate emission factors, and calculates emissions using the supplied VMT and additional temporal allocation factors for the VMT.

**1. Data Sour**  **ces a.**  **Source of default model data** The MANE -VU 2002 onroad emissions inventory was compiled from data supplied by the MANE -VU State agencies in the form of onroad emissions input data or emissions inventories either directly

to MANE - VU or to EPA through their CERR submittal. States provided information in one or more of the following ways: (1) an onroad emission inventory submittal to EPA, (2) MOBILE6 inputs and VMT data in NMIM format to EPA, (3) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to EPA, or (4) portions of MOBILE6 inputs or full MOBILE6 input files and supporting files plus VMT to MANE -VU. Different procedures were followed in developing the MANE -VU 2002 onroad emission inventory depending upon how the data were submitted. As discussed above, the primary data needed in preparing the inputs for the onroad modeling files were the VMT data and MOBILE6 input files. All of the MANE -VU States provided VMT data, which were incorporated in the SMOKE modeling. The level of detail of the supplied VMT data and any additional processing of the VMT data are discussed individually by State, below, in Section B: State - Specific Methods. Therefore, no default data were needed for the VMT inputs. Default model inputs for the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files were needed in some cases. The source of default information to be included in these input files was the NMIM national county

database, as this was also the default source of data for EPA in preparing the 2002 NEI. This database includes information on monthly fuel data by

county, control program information by

county, such as inspection and maintenance (I/M) program inputs, and other fleet information, such as vehicle registration distributions, that may have been supplied by

the States. Additionally, vehicle speed information is needed in the SMOKE modeling files. Some States supplied this information. In cases where no speed data were supplied, the default speeds used by EPA in calculating the NEI were used. These speeds differ b y road class group and b y vehicle class group.

## 95

For the SMOKE modeling, Pechan did not provide any ambient data such as temperature or humidity. Instead, the SMOKE model needs meteorological input data specific to the episode(s) being modeled. Thus, although the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files do include temperature data and in some cases humidity data, these inputs will be replaced by the SMOKE model with the appropriate episode - specific data.

**b. Model inputs and revisions provided by State** **s** The model inputs and revisions provided by the States are discussed in detail in Section B, below. These inputs include VMT data, VMT temporal data, vehicle speeds, I/M program inputs, registrations distributions, and other MOBILE6 input data.

**c. Mode** **l inputs provided vs. model inputs used** Pechan prepared the following model input files for Version 3 of the MANE -VU modeling inventory :  MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt

—contains VMT and speeds b y county and SCC;  MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt

—contains VM T temporal profiles;  MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt

—contains cross references between temporal profiles and county/ SCC;  MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt

—contains VMT vehicle mix fractions;  MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt

—contains cross reference between MANE -VU counties and the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files;  MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt

—contains general county- level information for SMOKE;  MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt

—contains hourly

speed profiles (SPDPRO);  MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt

—contains cross references between spe ed profiles and MANE -VU county

/SCC;  MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt

—contains information on SCCs used in MBINV file;  MANEVU_SMOKE_M6Inputs_MA_NJ_02022006.zip

—contains monthly SMOKE formatted MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts and New Jersey, updated for Version 3;  MANEVU_2002_SMOKE_M6_InputFiles032004.zip

—contains monthly SMOKE formatted MOBILE6 input files for all MANE - VU States. Files for Massachusetts and New Jersey

from this zip file should be replaced by the Version 3 files dated 02/02/2006.  MANEVU_2002_SMO KE_M6_ExternalFiles.zip

—contains external data files called b y the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files. **2. What Quality Assurance Steps were Performed?**  This section provides a brief summary of the QA steps and processes that were performed in the development of the onroad sector modeling inputs for MANE - VU. The initial QA procedures were performed on the emissions and input data used to calculate the MANE -VU 2002 onroad

## 96

emission inventory . Some of these QA procedures are also relevant here to the modeling inventory as many of the inputs are either the same or start with common information. For States submitting onroad emission inventories to EPA, Pechan performed QA checks on the State -provided emission inventory data to ensure completeness, referential integrity, and correct formatting of the data. Where necessary as a result of these QA checks, and with the approval of the affected State, Pechan revised the inventories to meet the necessary inventory

standards. For the modeling inventory, the VMT checks inc luded in these QA checks are relevant. Note that a Quality Assurance Plan was prepared prior to initiating work on Version 1 (MANE -VU, 2003). This plan was applied during development of all three versions of the MANE -VU inventory .

**a. Data input summary**  **spreadsheets for State review** In reviewing the data submitted for both the annual onroad inventory and the onroad modeling files, Pechan prepared a State QA report for each State. These reports were in the form of Excel spreadsheets. In each of the State QA reports, a page was included that summarized the modeling inputs. This included MOBILE6 input parameters, such as I/M data, registration data, and fuel data. Columns were included indicating the data file name, data coverage (e.g., statewide or for specific counties), data source, any comments regarding the data, an indication of whether any guidance was requested from the State agency before proceeding, and columns for State agency

approval of the listed inputs. These reports were provided to each State agency and the State could either approve the inputs summarized or provide an alternate data source or calculation method. For States that had submitted emission inventories in NIF format, results of the NIF QA checks were also included in these State QA reports for the states to review and approve and provide alternate data or methods. This table also include information on the VMT data source and any proposed methodologies needed for processing the VMT.

**b. Responses from State Agencies**  The appropriate State agency staff reviewed the State QA reports and provided direction for correcting QA issues either in the QA Summary Report Excel file or via e - mail. The modeling inputs were then revised to incorporate responses from the agencies.

**3. Versio**  **n 3 Emission Summaries** Table V- 1 presents a summary of the annual 2002 Version 3 MANE - VU onroad sector pollutant emissions for each MANE -VU State, as well as a regional total. Differences between these Version 3 annual emission totals and the Version 2 totals documented in the January 2005 MANE -VU mobile sources inventory report are the result of updated data provided by New Jersey and Massachusetts. Emissions for the remaining states have not changed. Itshould be noted that these emission results are from the annual inventory modeling. These will differ from the results obtained b y the SMOKE onroad modeling. Additionally, the emissions in this table do not reflect VMT updates from Vermont that were provided after the Version 2 MANE -VU annual inventory had been calculated, but were included in the SMOKE Version 2 and Version 3 modeling inputs.

## 97

**Table V -**  **1. A nnual 2002 Onroad Sector Emissions by**  **MA NE**  **- VU State**  **(Tons/Year) State**  **VOC NO**  **x CO**  **SO 2**  **PM10 -**  **PRI PM25**  **- PRI**  **NH 3**  Connecticut 31,755.3 68,816 .2 562,124.0 1,666.9 1,580.0 1,041.6 3,293.9 Delaware 10,563.8 21,340.5 160,760.4 583.9 581.1 414.9 902.8 District of Columbia 4,895.3 8,902.0 66,017.6 271.1 222.0 153.0 397.8 Maine 23,037.4 54,686.8 410,957.8 1,803.9 1,239.1 934.4 1,467.5 Maryland 61, 846.7 122,210.0 1,000,762.8 4,057.6 3,168.3 2,200.4 5,594.3 Massachusetts 57,185.5 143,367.6 1,039,100.1 4,398.8 3,407.5 2,409.9 5,499.1 New Hampshire 16,762.3 33,283.0 306,792.5 776.9 814.3 561.8 1,447.0 New Jersey 89,752.9 152,076.1 1,273,513.1 3,648. 6 3,725.3 2,469.0 7,382.0 New York 287,845.2 319,732.5 3,711,149.6 10,639.5 8,457.5 5,897.7 14,680.9 Pennsylvania 176,090.3 346,471.5 2,784,196.5 10,924.1 7,351.5 5,331.2 10,532.3 Rhode Island 12,537.8 16,677.2 186,196.8 425.3 345.1 210.5 852.6 Vermont 17,287.8 20,669.9 248,247.6 893.8 669.6 482.8 934.1 **Total MANE -** **VU 789,560.3**  **1,308,233.3 11,749,818.8**  **40,090.5 31,561.3**  **22,107.2 52,984.3**  

## B. State**- Specific Methods**  The following sections describe what modeling inputs were used for each State and how these inputs were developed.

**1. Connecticut**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 2 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Connecticut. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. The VMT inputs provided by Connecticut were in the form of three sets of data. This included a file with VMT by

county and four road types (Expressway, Arterial/Co llector, Local, and Ramp), a set of Statewide VMT mixes at the 16 vehicle type - level for each of the four Connecticut road types, and a Statewide hourly VMT distribution file. Additional data provided by Connecticut showing the correspondence between the four Connecticut road ty pes and the 12 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) road types were used to first distribute the county VMT to the 12 road ty

pes. Average daily

miles were converted to annual miles by multiplying the average daily miles by 365. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the Connecticut registration distribution and with a separate scenario for each of the VMT mixes provided at the 16 vehicle type level. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle type VMT mix corresponding to each of the four Connecticut road ty pes. The VMT data b y county and 12 road types were then multiplied b y the 28 vehicle type VMT fractions to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicle ty pe level and 12 road ty

pe level by

county (for use in calculating the annual emission inventory). VMT from these 28 vehicle types were

## 98

then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by

vehicle ty

pe for each county

and road ty

pe were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file.

**Table V -** **2. Connecticut Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC CT Speeds MANEV U_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle groups Default NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/ hour/road ty pe CT VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type CT SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2 002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## For Connecticut, speed information is contained in both the MBINV SMOKE file as well as in the SMOKE speed profile (SPDPRO) and speed cross reference file (SPDREF) files. The speed information contained in the MBINV file is simply the default NEI speed data. The actual speed data to be used in the modeling inventory for Connecticut are contained in the SMOKE SPDPRO and SPDREF. The speed data from these two files should overwrite the default speed information contained in the MBINV file during the SMOKE modeling. The data used to develop the speed profiles were provided b y Connecticut in the form of NMIM speed input files with the fraction of VMT occurring within each of 14 speed bins. These speed distributions differ b y hour of day and by freeways versus arterials and collectors. Separate speed distribution files were provided b y C onnecticut for each county . Pechan then converted these speed data into the speed profile format needed for SMOKE

— hourly average speeds by

county and the two specified road ty

pes. Connecticut provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution;  

## Hourly

VMT distributions;  

## Statewide I/M program inputs and Anaerobic Thermal Processor (ATP); and  

## RVP and fuel program data. The data submitted b y Connecticut indicated that Federal Northern reformulated gasoline is in place in the State, with an ozone season RVP of 6.8 pounds per square inch (psi). Based on the NMIM modeling that was performed for the annual emission inventory, the reformulated gasoline program was modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files using the combination of the FUEL PROGRAM: 4 command (indicating user- supplied gasoline sulfur inputs), RVP command, and the OXYGENATED FUELS command. The monthly oxygenated fuel and gasoline sulfur inputs, and the non- ozone season monthly RVP values were obtained from the

## 99

NMIM national county database for Connecticut. During the ozone season months, the RVP value submitted by

Connecticut of 6.8 psi was modeled. The fuel data obtained from NMIM are the same for all counties in Connecticut, except Fairfield, which shows different fuel properties, but all represent reformulated gasoline. These values for both Fairfield and the remaining counties differed b y season (i.e., the ozone season from May through September, transition months of March, April, October, and November, and the winter months of December, January, and February). Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 367 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 353 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. Data provided b y Connecticut indicated that the State follows the OTC low emission vehicle (LEV) program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for Connecticut.

**c. What**  **Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?** None identified b y the State.

**2. Delaware**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 3 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Delaware. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files. Delaware provided VMT data in the form of the NEINIF PE table as well as in the NMIM BaseYearVMT table format. Additionally, Delaware provided monthly VMT fractions developed from VMT counts on a variety of road ty pes. These monthly

VMT fractions were provided for each of the Delaware counties. Since the data in the NEI NIF PE table were at the level of detail needed for the SMOKE MBINV file, the format of the VMT data was simply converted from the NIF format to the SMOKE MBINV format. Similarly, the monthly VMT fractions were converted to the profile format needed in the SMOKE MTPRO file, with the appropriate cross referenc es in the MTREF file. The average speeds provided by Delaware at the county

/road type level were included in the SMOKE MBINV file.

## 100 **Table V -** **3. Delaware Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Dat**  **a Source**  VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC DE Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road typ e DE VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_0202200 6.txt Monthly by county/road type DE SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## The fuel data submitted by Delaware was based on the NMIM defaults with the NMIM October data replaced b y the NMIM November data. The reformulated gas fuel parameters were modeled in the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files b y using the combination of the OXYGENATED FUELS, FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for e ach month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 280 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 290 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. Data provided b y Delaware indicated that the State follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model ye ar followed b y a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for Delaware.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**3. District of Columbia**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 4 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the District of Columbia. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

## 101

**Table V -** **4. District of Columbia Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_0202200 6.txt County/ SCC DC Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type DC VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Road type DC SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt Co unty 

## The District of Columbia provided 2002 VMT data in the form of the NM IM BaseYearVMT table. This table included VMT at the 28 vehicle ty pe level for each of the six urban road ty pes in the District of Columbia. VMT from these 28 vehicle types were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle ty pe for each county and road ty pe were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. The District also provided a spreadsheet including the daily average weighted speed b y roadway class. These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file. The District of Columbia provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## District-wide registration distribution;  

## I/M program and ATP inputs; and  

## Weekday

trip length distribution file. The District of Columbia specified that the NM IMfuel program default data for the District should be used for the MANE -VU modeling. This included reformulated gasoline district wide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 329 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August) , 324 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 326 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. Data provided b y the District of Columbia indicated that the District follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA I** 

**ssues were Identified and Addressed?** No QA issues were identified for the District of Columbia.

## 102 **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the District of Columbia should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model reformulated gasoline in the District of Columbia. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. **4. Maine**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 5 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Maine. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

**Table V -** **5. Maine Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version**  **3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail**  **Data Source**  VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC ME Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road typ e ME VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide/road type Default SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MA NEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## Maine provided 2002 average daily VMT by county and 12 roadway

ty pes. Maine had no information available on the distribution of VMT among vehicle types. Therefore, Pechan developed the VMT b y county, roadway type, and vehicle type b y using the default MOBILE6 2002 VMT mix by

vehicle ty

pe. These VMT data were converted to annual VMT by multiplying the average daily VMT b y 365. The MOBILE6 VMT default mix fractions by vehicle type for 2002 were included for Maine in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Maine also provided average speed data b y county and roadway typ e. These data were included in the SMOKE MBINV file. Maine provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## I/M program inputs and ATP inputs for Cumberland County only ; and  

## Monthly

average RVP data. Statewide diesel sulfur values were obtained from the NMIM defaults for Maine. A diesel sulfur value of 390 ppm sulfur was modeled in the summer months (June, July, and August), 338 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 364 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months.

## 103

Data provided b y M aine indicated that the State follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed b y a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for Maine.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**5. Maryland**  **a. What**  **Data Sources Were Used?** Table V- 6 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Maryland. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information us ed to create these data files. Maryland submitted annual VMT data in the form of a NIF tblMobilePE table. This included VMT by county, 12 vehicle ty

pes, and 12 road types. These VMT data were then converted to the format needed for the SMOKE MBINV file. Pechan calculated VMT mix fractions from the VMT data supplied b y M aryl and to obtain the VMT mixes by county and road ty

pe contained in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. In addition, Maryland provided monthly VMT distribution data by road ty pe. Pechan converted these data to the format needed for the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. The same set of monthly temporal profiles were applied to all counties in Maryland. Maryland also provided a spreadsheet showing the average speed Statewide for each of the 12 roadway

ty pes. These speed data were included in the SMOKE MBINV file. Maryland provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## County- specific registration distribution;  

## County- specific diesel sales fractions;  

## I/M program inputs and ATP inputs to be applied in the 14 I/M counties; and  

## Statewide monthly

diesel sulfur content data. Maryland indicated that the NMIM default fuel parameters for Maryland should be used in the MANE -VU modeling. This fuel data includes reformulated gasoline in 14 of the Maryland counties. The reformulated gasoline program was modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. Maryland provided monthly Statewide diesel sulf

ur values. These values ranged from 455 ppm sulfur to 500 ppm

## 104

sulfur. These values were included in the corresponding monthly SMOKE MOBILE6 input files. **Table V -** **6. Mary land Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files** 

**Final M AN**  **E -** **VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File L**  **evel of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC MD Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road typ e MD VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e MD Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEV U_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Statewide monthly by road type MD SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## Data provided b y M aryl and indicated that the State follow s the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed b y a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for Maryland affecting the modeling inventory files. **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for Maryland should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully

model reformulated gasoline in the Maryland counties that implement the reformulated gasoline program. This command was inadvertently left out of the Maryland SMOKE MOBILE6 files.

## 105 **6. Mass**  **achusetts a.**  **What Data Sources Were Used?** Table V- 7 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Massachusetts. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

**Table V -** **7. Massachusetts Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC MA Speeds MANEVU_2002_ mb inv_02022006.txt County/road typ e MA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e Default Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county MA SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref _02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## The Version 3 MANE -VU onroad modeling for Massachusetts differed from the Version 2 modeling, based on updates provided b y Massachusetts in December 2005. The primary changes for Massachusetts from Version 3 is the use of updated 2002 VMT data and vehicle speed date. Massachusetts provided a spreadsheet containing revised VMT values and vehicle speeds for 2002 b y county and SCC. Pechan prepared the revised Massachusetts VMT data and the speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV file. Using the revised VMT data b y SCC, Pechan calculated the updated VMT mixes by vehicle ty

pe for each county and road type in Massachusetts and formatted the resulting data to be included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. The original VMT data submitted by Massachusetts included VMT for each of the four seasons. Pechan used these data to develop monthly VMT temporal profiles. Seasonal VMT was assigned to the months in that season based on the ratio of the number of days in a specific month to the number of days in the season. Pechan then formatted the monthly temporal VMT allocation factors for inclusion in the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files.

## 106

Massachusetts provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution;  

## Statewide I/M program inputs and ATP inputs;  

## RVP and fuel program data;  

## Diesel sulfur content of 350 ppm sulfur year-round and statewide; and  

## Massachusetts - specific LEV and Tier 2 implementation files. Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewide throughout the State, with a RVP value of 6.7 psi during the ozone season and 13.5 psi during the remaining months, based on inputs provide d by

Massachusetts. The section below on QA issues for Massachusetts discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. Massachusetts provided the necessary inputs to model the State’s LEV implementation schedule and Tier 2 data, which differ from the OTC - LEV program and from the default MOBILE6 Tier 2 data. **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  In addition to the VMT updates, Pechan revised the SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts for Version 3. This was done because Version 2 of the MANE -VU modeling inventory was prepared using the default setting of MOBILE6 to model reformulated gasoline (i.e., using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”). Since the time that the Version 2 inventory was created, EPA found a bug with the sulfur content values used when the default reformulated gasoline command is used. To eliminate this problem, Pechan created revised SMOKE MOBILE6 input files for Massachusetts that model reformulated gasoline by explicitly setting the RVP, gasoline sulfur contents, and gasoline oxygen contents. The gasoline sulfur contents and gasoline oxygen contents were set according to the default parameters laid out in the MOBILE6 user’s guide. The summer (May through September) sul fur content is 129 ppm in 2002 and the winter sulfur content is 279 ppm in 2002. The summer gasoline contains 2.1 percent oxygen, with MTBE as the oxygenate. The winter gasoline contains 1.5 percent oxygen in 70 percent of the fuel having MTBE as the oxygenate, and 3.5 percent oxygen in 30 percent of the fuel having ETOH as the oxygenate. The RVP values were not changed from those modeled in Version 2 (6.7 psi in the summer and 13.5 psi in the winter).

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versi** **ons?** None identified b y the State.

**7. New Hampshire**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 8 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of New Hampshire. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

## 107 **Table V -** **8. New Hampshire Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_020 22006.txt County/ SCC NH Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road typ e NH VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide NH SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022 006.txt County 

## The VMT inputs provided by New Hampshire were in the form of summer day VMT by county or nonattainment area and roadway typ e. In addition, New Hampshire provided a Statewide VMT mix distribution by 16 vehicle types in the MOBILE6 files provided by the State. Pechan then developed a simple MOBILE6 input file that used the New Hampshire Statewide registration distribution and the Statewide VMT mix by vehicle ty

pe. Pechan used the resulting MOBILE6 output file to extract the 28 vehicle ty pe VMT mix to be applied Statewide to the county /roadway type VMT data. Summer day miles were converted to annual miles by using national data from the Federal Highway Administration’s Travel Volume Trends which provides 2002 monthly

VMT for groups of road categories. Additionally, the VMT data from the three New Hampshire nonattainment areas represented four counties. To allocate these VMT b y county, Pechan first totaled the VMT data from these three nonattainment areas by roadway typ e. Then, using ratios developed from the preliminary 2002 NEI VMT, Pechan allocated the grouped VMT b y county and roadway type. With VMT for the entire State at the county /roadway type level of detail, Pechan then multiplied the VMT data by the 28 vehicle type VMT fraction s to obtain a VMT file at the 28 vehicle ty pe level and 12 roadway

ty pe level by county for use in preparing the annual onroad emission inventory . VMT from these 28 vehicle ty pes were then aggregated to the 12 vehicle types needed for the SMOKE MBINV input file. The VMT mix fractions by vehicle type for each county and road type were also calculated for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. New Hampshire also provided a spreadsheet including the average speed b y roadway class for each county or county group . These speeds were incorporated in the SMOKE MBINV file. New Hampshire provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution; and  

## Statewide ATP inputs. New H ampshire specified that the NMIM fuel program default data for New Hampshire should be used for the MANE -VU modeling. This included reformulated gasoline in four counties, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the

## 108

summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. Data provided b y New Hampshire indicated that the State follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed by

a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model ye ar. **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Through the State QA report process, New Hampshire provided updated inputs for VMT and speeds that were incorporated in the modeling inventory inputs. **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  The SMOKE MOBILE6 files for the four New Hampshire that implement reformulated gasoline should include the OXYGENATED FUELS command to fully model the benefits reformulated gasoline. This command was inadvertently left out of the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. **8. New Jersey**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 9 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of New Jersey . This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

**Table V -** **9. New Jersey Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Inpu**  **t File Level of Detail**  **Data Source**  VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC NJ Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle groups Default NEI VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e NJ Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_m tpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county groups and weekday/weekend NJ SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## Updates were made to the Version 2 MOBILE6 SMOKE inputs for New Jersey in December 2005 to create Version 3, based on revised data provided by the State. New Jersey

provided the following files:

## 109  

## a set of SMOKE MOBILE6 input files by county and month;  

## NJ_2002_mbinv.txt file that contained revised VMT and speeds b y county and SCC, generated b y NJDEP in August 2005, in SMOKE format;  

## amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt

—a SMOKE - formatted file containing county /SCC - level temporal profile cross -references;  

## amptro.m3. manevu.vistascem.032805_NJVMT.txt

—a SMOKE - formatted file containing county- specific VMT temporal profiles prepared by NJDEP in August 2005; and  

## zip files containing external files needed to run the SMOKE MOBILE6 files. After an initial review of these fil es, Pechan did not note any differences in the SMOKE MOBILE6 files from the Version 2 files. Pechan then confirmed with New Jersey that the only changes from the Version 2 date were in the VMT data. The VMT and speed data b y county and SCC in the MBI

NV f ile provided by

New Jersey

were copied to the MANE -VU SMOKE MBINV file, replacing the VMT and speed data from the Version 2 SMOKE MBINV file for New Jersey . The speed data included by New Jersey

are the default NEI speeds by road typ e and vehicle type. U sing the new VMT data provided by New Jersey, Pechan calculated a revised set of VMT mix fractions by vehicle type and included these in the Version 3 SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pechan pasted the temporal profiles provided for New Jersey into the SMOKE MTPRO file . This included monthly temporal profiles and diurnal temporal profiles. The diurnal temporal profiles were applied to both weekdays and weekends. Similarly the temporal cross reference data included in the file provided b y New Jersey was pasted into the SMOKE MTREF file for MANE -VU Version 3. The following New Jersey-provided were included in the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution;  

## Statewide diesel sales fractions;  

## Statewide I/M program and ATP inputs; and  

## Diesel sulfur content data (340 ppm statewide). Northern reformulated gasoline was modeled statewide throughout the State, using NM IMfuel program input defaults for New Jersey . The section below on QA issues for New Jersey discusses the fuel inputs modeled in the Version 3 SMOKE MOBILE6 input files in more detail. Data provided b y New Jersey indicated that the State follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE 6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed b y a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  As discussed above for New Jers ey, the Version 2 New Jersey SMOKE MOBILE6 input files modeled reformulated gasoline using the command line “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”, which is the default method for modeling reformulated gasoline with MOBILE6. To eliminate the effects

## 110

of the MOBILE6 reformulated gasoline bug from the SMOKE MOBILE6 inputs, Pechan explicitly modeled the reformulated gasoline program in the New Jersey MOBILE6 input files by explicitly

modeling the appropriate settings of the RVP, oxygenated fuel content commands, and gaso line sulfur commands. The values for oxygenated fuel settings and gasoline sulfur contents by

month were extracted from the NMIM county- level database used in developing the annual emissions inventory for the MANE -VU Version 2 onroad emissions inventory . **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**9. New York**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 10 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of New York. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

**Table V -**  **10. New York Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC NY Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/3 vehicle groups Default NEI Speed profiles MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt and

MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt County/ hour/road ty pe NY VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmt mi x_02022006.txt County/road typ e NY Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by 3 county groups NY SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2 002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## VMT for New York was provided in the form of a NIF PE table. These VMT data were extracted and included in the SMOKE MBINV file. VMT mix fractions by vehicle type were calculated from these VMT data and included in the S MOKE VMTMIX file. New York provided a spreadsheet with average speeds in each of four daily time periods by county and road type. Pechan converted these speed data to the SMOKE SPDPRO format, assigning the speed for a given time period to all hours included in that time period. Pechan also prepared the SMOKE SPDREF file to appropriately cross reference each county and road type to the corresponding hourly speed profile. Because these more detailed speed files were provided for New York, the average spee d by road type and county in the MBINV file was populated with default NEI speeds.

## 1 11

New York also provided spreadsheets showing monthly VMT b y county and roadtype. After processing these VMT values to develop monthly temporal factors, Pechan observed that there were only three unique monthly profiles in this data set. These three profiles were then added to the SMOKE MTPRO file. Pechan then matched each county and road typ e in the State to the corresponding monthly

VMT profile in the SMOKE MTREF file. New York provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Registration distributions

—one for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;  

## Diesel sales fractions

—one for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;  

## Statewide mileage accumulation rate input;  

## Monthly

RVP data

—one set for the New York metropolitan area and one for the rest of the State;  

## Reformulated gasoline program inputs for affected counties modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”);  

## I/M program inputs for affected counties;  

## Statewide ATP inputs;  

## Hourly

VMT distributions by

county group;  

## Start distributions by

county ;  

## Diesel sulfur content data (400 ppm statewide). New York also provided the necessary input files to model the State’s LEV program implementation schedule, which differs from the OTC LEV program. New York also provided MOBILE6 Tier 2 modeling files to be used along with the New York LEV program inputs. These inputs were included in the SMOKE MOBILE6 modeling.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for New York affecting the modeling inventory files. **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

**10. Pennsylvania**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 11 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Pennsylvania. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

## 112 **Table V -**  **11. Pennsy lvania Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files**  **Final M AN**  **E -** **VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File Level of Detail**  **Data Source**  VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC PA Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/road typ e PA VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e PA Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly by county PA SMOKE MOBILE6 file l isting MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## Pennsylvania provided a database file (NEIANN02.dbf) that contained the VMT and speed data by county, roadway

ty pe, and vehicle type. This included the same VMT used in the calculation of the annual onroad inventory submitted by

Pennsylvania for MANE -VU. Pechan converted the data from this database file into VMT and speed data in the format of the SMOKE MBINV file. From the VMT data, Pechan calculated VMT fractions b y vehicle type by county and road ty pe for inclusion in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Pennsylvania also provided estimates of VMT by month for each county . Pechan converted these data to monthly allocation factors in the format neede d by

the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. A separate monthly profile was developed for each county, but applied to all road ty pes within that county. Pennsylvania provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Registration distributions for each individual county ;  

## I/M program and ATP inputs for affected Philadelphia and Pittsburgh area counties (inputs differ for the two areas);  

## Monthly RVP data for all counties including 7.8 psi RVP program from May through September for Pittsburgh counties;  

## Reformulated gasoline for the 5 - county Philadelphia area modeled with MOBILE6 defaults (i.e., “FUEL PROGRAM : 2 N”); and  

## Diesel sulfur content data (500 ppm statewide). Data provided b y Penns ylvania indicated that the State follows the OTC - LEV program vehicle implementation schedule. Therefore, the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule was included in the MOBILE6 SMOKE input files, starting implementation in the 1999 model year followed b y a full implementation of the National LEV program in the 2001 model year.

## 113 **b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  No QA issues were identified for Penns ylvania affecting the modeling inventory files. **c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Ver**  **sions?** None identified b y the State.

**11. Rhode Island**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 12 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Rhode Island. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

**Table V -**  **12. Rhode Island Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input File**  **Level of Detail Data**  **Source** VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_0 2022006.txt County/ SCC RI Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County group/road ty pe RI VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt Statewide RI SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County 

## Rhode I sland provided a spreadsheet with the 2002 VMT as well as Statewide 2002 VMT fractions b y 16 vehicle types. Pechan prepared a simple MOBILE6 input file including this Rhode I sland 2002 VMT mix by vehicle typ e and the 2002 Rhode Island registration distribution. The VMT mix in the MOBILE6 output file at the 28 vehicle ty pe level was then used to distribute the VMT by vehicle category . The 2002 daily VMT was at the State level, broken down b y the 12 roadway types. To allo cate these VMT data to the county /road ty pe level of detail, Pechan summed the VMT from the preliminary version of EPA’s 2002 NEI for Rhode Island first b y State and roadway type and then b y county and roadway typ e. Pechan calculated county /roadway type VMT fractions b y dividing the VMT at the county/roadway type level b y the State/roadway

type VMT for the same roadway type. These fractions were then multiplied by the VMT supplied b y Rhode I sland at the State/roadway type level of detail to obtain county /roadway type VMT data. These county/roadway type VMT data were then multiplied b y the 28 vehicle type VMT fractions to obtain VMT at the level of detail needed to populate the NMIM BaseYearVMT table for calculating the annual inventory and were then summe d to the 16 -vehicle type level of detail for use in the SMOKE MBINV file. The data were also converted from daily

VMT to annual by

multiplying the average daily VMT b y 365. VMT mix fractions

## 114

from this final data set were then formatted in the SMOKE VMTMIX format at the State level of detail. Statewide speeds by road type, as provided by Rhode Island, were included in the SMOKE MBINV file. Rhode I sland provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution; and  

## Statewide I/M program inputs. Data for fuel parameters were obtained from the NMIM national county database for Rhode Island. This included reformulated gasoline Statewide, modeled using the FUEL RVP, and FUEL PROGRAM (for gasoline sulfur contents) commands for each month. These values differed b y s eason, but were consistent Statewide. Statewide diesel sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 400 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 340 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 370 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. The NMIM default LEV program for Rhode Island was modeled, which includes the OTC - LEV program LEV implementation schedule.

**b. What QA**  **Issues were Identified and Addressed?** No QA issues were identified for Rhode Island.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  The Rhode Island SMOKE MOBILE6 input files did not include the OXYGENATED FUELS command. This should have been used to fully characterize the parameters of reformulated gasoline that is used Statewide in Rhode Island.

**12. Vermont**  **a. What Data Sources Were Used?**  Table V- 13 summarizes the onroad SMOKE input files that were prepared containing information for the State of Vermont. This table notes the level of detail of the data included as well as the source of the original information used to create these data files.

## 115 **Table V -**  **13. Vermont Onroad Data in SMOKE Input Files Final M**  **AN E**  **- VU Version 3 SMOKE Input F**  **ile Level of Detail**  **Data Source**  VMT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt County/ SCC VT Speeds MANEVU_2002_mbinv_02022006.txt Road type/vehicle group (light- duty

vs. heavy- duty) VT VMT mix MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02022006.txt County/road typ e VT Te mp oral profiles MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006.txt and

MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006.txt Monthly statewide SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mcref_02022006.txt County SMOKE MOBILE6 file listing MANEVU_2002_mvref_02022006.txt County



## Vermont submitted VMT data in the format of the NIF PE table. Vermont then provided updated VMT data for three road classifications (rural minor collectors, rural local roads, and urban local roads) in December 2004, after the time that these changes could be included in the MANE -VU annual onroad emission inventory . However, the updated VMT were included in the MANE -VU Version 3 onroad SMOKE modeling files. This VMT change resulted in a Statewide decrease in VMT from about 9.5 billion miles to about 7.8 billion miles. As a result, the SMOKE modeling performed b y MANE -VU will not match the MANE -VU emission inventory for Vermont. The VMT data were converted to the SMOKE MBINV file format. VMT mix fractions were calculated from the VMT data and included in the SMOKE VMTMIX file. Vermont also provided information on the temporal allocation of VMT. From these data, Pechan prepared a monthly VMT profile for Vermont and included the data in the SMOKE MTPRO and MTREF files. Vermont provided information on Statewide speeds by roadway ty pe. These speeds differed for light- duty vehicles and heavy- duty vehicles. Pechan incorporated this speed information into the SMOKE MBINV file. Vermont provided the following data that were incorporated into the monthly MOBILE6 input files for the SMOKE modeling:

 

## Statewide registration distribution;  

## Statewide I/M program inputs; and  

## RVP data. The RVP data provided by Vermont were based on data from a local gasoline tank farm and resulted in an RVP value of 8.5 psi during the ozone season months (May through September) and 9.47 psi for the remaining months. Data for fuel parameters other than RVP (e.g., diesel and gasoline fuel sulfur content) were obtained from the NMIM national county database for Vermont. These values differed b y s eason, but were cons istent Statewide. Statewide diesel

## 116

sulfur values modeled from NMIM were 300 ppm sulfur in the summer months (June, July, and August), 290 ppm sulfur in the winter months (December, January, and February), and 295 ppm sulfur in the spring and fall months. The NMIM default LEV program for Vermont was modeled, which includes Vermont’s State specific LEV implementation schedule.

**b. What QA Issues were Identified and Addressed?**  Through the State QA report process, Vermont provided a missing registration data file, RVP data and revised VMT.

**c. What Issues Need to be Addressed in Future Versions?**  None identified b y the State.

## 117

**CHAPTER VI** – **BIOGENIC SOURCES A.**  **General Methods for all States 1.**  **What Data Sources Were Used?** Biogenic emissions for the time period from January 1, 2002

– December 31, 2002 were calculated b y the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for all of the MANE -VU states using the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) version 3.12 integrated within SMOKE2.1. The inventory was prepared at the state - level for CO, nitrous oxide (NO), and VOC. General information about BEIS is available at http://www.epa.gov/AMD/biogen.html while documentation about biogenic emissions processing within SMOKE2.1 is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch06s10.html and http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch06s17.html. Note that the SMOKE documentation refers to BEIS3.09 and has not yet been updated for BEIS3.12. This aff ects the number of species modeled as well as the use of different speciation profiles. However, the general processing approach has not changed from BEI S3.09 to BEIS3.12. In short, this processing approach is as follows and was utilized by NYSDEC for it s biogenic emission processing for MANE -VU and the OTC modeling:

 **Normbeis3** reads gridded land use data and emissions factors and produces gridded normalized biogenic emissions for 34 species/compounds. The gridded land use file utilized by

NYSDEC include s the fractional coverage of 230 different land use ty pes for each of the 172 * 172 12 -km grid cells in the MANE -VU/OTC modeling domain. In a separate BEIS3.12 input file, both summer and winter emissions factors for each species/compound are provided for each of the 230 land use ty pes. On output, **Normbeis3** generates a file B3GRD 

## which contains gridded summer and winter emission fluxes for the modeling domain that are normalized to 30 °C and a photosy nthetic active radiation (PAR) of 1000 μmol/m2 

## s. In addition, gridded summer and winter leaf area indices (LAI) are also written to B3GRD 

## .  **Tmpbeis3** reads the gridded, normalized emissions file B3GRD and meteorological data from the MCIP -processed MM5 meteorological fields generated by the University

of Maryl and for MANE -VU/OTC modeling. Specifically, the following MM5/MCIP meteorological variables are used b y **Tmpbeis3** to compute hourspecific, gridded biogenic emissions from the normalized emission fluxed contained in B3GRD: layer- 1 air temperature (“TA”), l ayer- 1 pressure (“PRES”), total incoming solar radiation at the surface (“RGRND”), and convective (“RC”) and nonconvective (“RN”) rainfall. Additionally, the emissions for the 34 species/compounds modeled b y BE IS 3.12 are converted to CO, NO, and the CB - IV VOC species utilized in CMAQ via the use of the BEIS3.12 - CB - IV speciation profile. Furthermore, an external file, BIOSEASON , was utilized to decide whether to use summer or winter emissions factors for any given grid cell on any given day . This file was generated by the SMOKE2.1 utility **Metscan** based on MM5 layer- 1 air

## 118 temperatures to determine the date of the last spring frost and first fall frost at each grid cell. Summer emission factors are used b y **Tm pbeis3**  for the time period between the day

of the last spring frost and the day of the first fall frost at any given grid cell, and winter emission factors are used for the remaining time period. Documentation for the **Metscan** utility is available at http://cf.unc.edu/cep/empd/ products/smoke/version2.1/html/ch05s07.html. An animated GIF file showing the BIOSEASON file used by NYSDEC can be found at ftp://ftp.dec.state.ny .us/dar/ air_research/chogrefe/biog_reports/b3season_movie.gif.

 For reporting purposes, the hourly, speciated, gridded emissions were aggregated to the county

level for each day . For any given grid cell, emissions were distributed among the counties intersecting this grid cell in proportion to the area of each of these counties within the grid cell. The area gridding surrogates needed for this aggregation are based on a file obtained from EPA via http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/new/bgpro.2km_041604.us.gz, followed b y windowing for the MANE -VU/OTC modeling domain. **2. Version 3 Emissions Summary**  Table VI - 1 presents a State - l evel summary of the annual biogenic source emissions in Version 3 of the 2002 MANE -VU inventory . The annual emissions are based on the sum of the daily emissions prepared using the modeling approach previously discussed. **Table VI -**  **1. Version 3 2002 MA N**  **E -** **VU Biogenic Source**

**Emissions by**

**State (Tons/Year) State**  **CO NO**  **VOC*** Connecticut 6,889 560 64,017 Delaware 4,274 990 46,343 District of Columbia 150 30 1,726 Maine 64,936 2,018 600,205 Maryland 18,351 2,934 210,104 Massachusetts 11,594 1,257 1 13,958 New Hampshire 14,306 482 141,894 New Jersey 14,058 1,813 181,617 New York 63,436 8,313 492,487 Pennsylvania 59,946 8,646 585,272 Rhode Island 1,764 211 19,233 Vermont 14,745 1,142 118,377 MANE -VU 274,451 28,396 2,575,232 * VOC emissions were calculated by adding the emissions for the following pollutants: ALD2, ETH, FORM, ISOP, NR, OLE, PAR, TERB, TOL, XYL. 

## B. **State -**  **Specific Methods** No state - specific methods were used in Version 3 of the MANE -VU inventory for biogenic emissions.

## 119

**CHAPTE R VII.**  **TEMPORAL, SPECIATION , AND SPATIAL ALLOCA** **TION**

**PROFILES AND PREPARA TION OF SMOKE (IDA)**  **AND RPO DATA EXCHANGE PROTOCOL (N** **IF 3.0) FORMATS** Table VII - 1 provides a summary of the file names and documentation used for modeling inputs for Version 3 of MANE - VU’s 2002 inventory for point, area, nonroad, and onroad sources. The final input files used for temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation of emissions were developed for Version 1 of the 2002 inventory and delivered to MARAMA during January 2005 (MANE -VU, 2005). These files were developed starting with the latest model input files available from EPA and then revised to include updates needed for the MANE -VU region or to add SCCs and profile assignments not included in the initial EPA data s ets. The files were revised between September 2004 and January 2005 to incorporate comments provided by MANE -VU. Files in Table VII - 1 with a date that is later than January 2005 were prepared to support modeling for Version 3. The notes column in the ta ble identifies the modifications made to the files if the files were changed after this date. Otherwise, files with a date later than January 2005 were either provided by a state agency

or were obtained from EPA and used for modeling Version 3. The remainder of this chapter provides a brief summary of the revisions made to the EPA data sets prepared for Version 1 of the 2002 MANE -VU inventory and subsequently

carried for the modeling for Version 3. Sections A, B, and C of this chapter discuss how the temporal allocation, speciation, and spatial allocation profiles, respectively, were developed. Section D of this chapter describes how the emissions inventory data were prepared in the SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0) Formats. **A. Te**  **mporal Profiles 1.**  **Point and Area Sources** The most recent SMOKE temporal cross - reference files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the cross -reference files for point and area sources. The following 3 classes of modifications were completed to improve the temporal allocation input files:

 Update temporal cross -reference to assign an existing profile in the default SMOKE profiles for SCCs in the MANE -VU inventory  Create a new temporal cross -reference to an existing profile in the default SMOKE profiles for SCCs in the MANE -VU inventory ; the cross - reference did not previously exist in the default SMOKE files but the profile did exist.  Create new temporal profiles and cross - references for SCCs in the MA NE -VU inventory ; neither the cross -reference nor profiles for the MANE -VU SCCs previously

existed in the default SMOKE files.

## 120 **a. Point Sources**  A total of 30 point SCCs existed in the MANE -VU point source inventory that were not in the point source cross - reference file; therefore, the SCCs were added to the cross -reference file and assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles. Table II- 2 lists the SCCs along with the state and county FIPS where the y occurred in the MANE -VU inventory . Temporal profiles could not be identified for the SCCs listed in Table VII - 3 due to either the SCC being shorter than 8 - digits or the lack of information about the source categories for identifying an appropriate profi le assignment. These SCCs were assigned the default profile b y SMOKE.

**b. Area Sources**  For area sources, the improvements to the EPA cross -reference file included updates to existing profiles in the file based on MANE -VU - specific data (see Table VII - 4) , addition of SCCs that were assigned to existing profiles based on the assignment of similar SCCs already assigned to the profiles (see Table VII - 5), and addition of new SCCs and profiles based on MANE -VU - or RPO - specific data (see Table VII- 6). Additi onal cross -referencing information used to revise the temporal cross - reference file included MANE -VU county- level information for residential wood combustion, monthly temporal profiles developed for NH 3 

## source categories using the Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) model, and a Delaware - specific cross -reference file associated with the Delaware inventory . The additions of new SCCs and new profiles shown in Table VII - 6 mostly apply to the state of Delaware (State FIPS=10). For the FIPS column, the “ - 9” designation means the cross -reference is applied for all counties that do not have a county or state - specific SCC cross reference record. These changes to the temporal cross -reference file allowed for the assignment of a non- flat temporal profile (262= uniform monthly, 7=uniform weekly and 24=uniform diurnal) to 95% of the SCCs in the area inventory.

**2. Nonroad Sources**  Nonroad sources used the same temporal profile and cross -reference files as area sources.

**3. Onroad Sources**  For onroad sources, the following States provided their own data to update the default temporal profile files and the temporal cross reference files: Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Penns ylvania, and Vermont. Each of these States provided VMT inf

ormation that could be used to develop monthly temporal profiles. The data were provided in a variety of formats, ranging from monthly or seasonal VMT to SMOKE formatted monthly

VMT temporal profiles. Where necessary, the monthly or seasonal VMT data were converted into the SMOKE monthly temporal profile format. In addition, New Jersey provided information for diurnal temporal profiles. However, the level of detail or variability provided in these monthly profiles varied b y State. Connecticut ’ s and Del aware’s profiles each varied b y county and road ty pe. Maryland’s profiles applied Statewide, with variability in the

## 121

profiles b y road type. Massachusetts’ profiles varied by county, road type, and vehicle type. Both New Jersey

and New York provided info rmation for three monthly temporal profiles, each used throughout one of the three county groups in each State. The Penns ylvania profiles varied by county, but not b y road type. Vermont provided information for a single monthly temporal profile to be use d throughout the State. **B. Speciation Profiles**  **1. Point and Area Sources**  The most recent SMOKE speciation cross - reference files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the cross -reference files for po int and area sources. These files were revised to complete SCC assignments for the Carbon Bond IV (CB IV) with PM mechanism for point and area sources. Inaddition, sulfur tagging species were added to the REMSAD7 CB - IV with PM mechanism (see Table VII- 1).

**a. Point Sources**  Thirty- one SCCs in the MANE -VU point source inventory did not have chemical speciation profile assignments for the CB - IVwith PM mechanism in the default SMOKE chemical cross reference file. For 10 of the SCCs, assignments for VOC and PM 2.5 

## were added to the speciation cross -reference file based on the speciation profile codes assigned to similar SCCs. Table VII - 7 shows the SCCs where an SCC speciation cross -reference record was added, the VOC and PM 2.5 

## speciation profile code ass igned, and the method used to assign the profiles. Assignments were not completed for the remaining 21 point source SCCs because of a lack of information on the emission sources needed to complete the assignments (see Table VII - 8 for the list of the SCCs) .

**b. Area Sources**  Speciation profile assignments were completed for many area source SCCs for the CB - IV with PM mechanism and were documented in separate spreadsheet files provided to MARAMA during September 2004. Assignments for VOC and PM 2.5 

## were added to the speciation cross reference file based on the speciation profile codes assigned to similar SCCs. Note that the transport fractions for fugitive dust were applied as a part of the modeling effort to adjust the mass emissions in Version 3 of the inventory .

**2. Nonroad Sources**  No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for nonroad sources were provided b y the MANE - VU States.

**3. Onroad Sources**  No updates to the speciation profiles or speciation assignments for onroad sources were provided by the MANE -VU States.

## 122

**C. Spatial Allocation Profiles**  The most recent spatial profile data files available from EPA during the summer of 2004 were used as the starting point for developing the spatial profile file for point and area sources. A detailed description of this surrogate dataset was provided in a file named “surrogate_ documentation_workbook052804.xls” from EPA’s website at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ chief/emch/spatial/newsurrogate.html. Many SCCs in the MANE -VU inventory did not have surrogate assignments in the default SMOKE gridding cross -reference file. About 200 SCC assignments were added to the gridding cross -reference file. The assignments were based on matching surrogate descriptions from the EPA99 surrogate data with the SCC descriptions. No updates to the spatial allocation files for nonroad and onroad sources were provided by the MANE -VU States. **D. Preparation of SMOKE (IDA) and RPO Data Exchange Protocol (NIF 3.0)**  **Formats** Table VII - 9 identifies the mass emissi ons and SMOKE input files for Version 3 of the MANE -VU point, area, nonroad, and onroad inventories. The SMOKE input file format contains one field for storing daily emissions for each pollutant. The area source inventory contains summer day, winter day, and average day emissions depending on the state and source category . Thus, two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for the area source inventory . One file contains annual, summer day, and average day emissions and the other file contains annual, winter day, and average day emissions. If summer day and average day

emissions were provided for the same process and pollutant in the inventory, the summer day

value was included in the SMOKE input file. If winter day and average day emissions were provided for the same process and pollutant in the inventory, the winter day value was included in the SMOKE input file. The point source inventory contains summer day

and winter day

emissions. Two sets of SMOKE input files were prepared for point sources as well (one file containing annual and summer day

emissions and the other containing annual and winter day emissions). Table VII - 10 provides the unique list of the start date, end date, and emission ty pe combinations for daily emissions in the point and area source inventories that were used to define summer, winter, and average day

emissions. This table also shows the names of the SMOKE input files in which the emissions are included. For onroad sources, daily emissions were calculated by SMOKE using the monthly MOBILE6 input files included in the SMOKE input files. The nonroad IDA file only has annual total emissions. The values in the “typical day” column are zero. Annual total emissions were allocated for each hour using the monthly, weekly, and diurnal profiles described in Section A.2 of this chapter.

## C - 123 **Table VII -**  **1. Profiles, Cross -**  **references, and Documentation for Model Inputs**

**for Version 3 of 2002 MA NE**  **- VU Inventor** **y**
**Description File Name**  **Format Date of**  **File used for**  **Version 3 Size** 

**(By tes)**  **Notes SCC descriptions file**  scc_desc_manevu.083104.txt SM OKE 8/31/2004 1,335,524 **Temporal Allocation Profiles** Technical memo on profile/cross - reference review for area sources MANE -VU_AreaEI_review_draft_090304.doc MS Wo rd 9/3/2004 760,320 Technical memo on profile/cross - reference review for point sources MANE -VU_PointEI_review_draft_090304.doc MS Wo rd 9/3/2004 262,144 Temporal profile cross reference file for point sources amptref.m3.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SM OKE 3/28/2005 704,998 Based on "amp tref.m3.manevu.012405.txt" prepared for Version 1, but added VISTAS BaseD cross - references to the state -specific 2002 continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) - derived point source temporal profiles generated by VISTAS for their BaseD modeling. Temporal profi les file for point sources amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.vistascem.032805.txt SM OKE 3/28/2005 178,427 Based on "amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt" prepared for Version 1, but added state -specific 2002 CEM - derived point source temporal profiles generated by VI STAS for their BaseD modeling. Temporal profile cross reference file for area sources amptref.m3.manevu.012405.txt SM OKE 1/24/2005 687,196 Temporal profiles file for area sources amptpro.m3.us+can.manevu.030205.txt SM OKE 3/2/2005 136,131 Temporal cros s reference file containing state -specific onroad mobile source data for Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont MANEVU_2002_mtref_02022006_addCT.txt SM OKE 2/22/2006 2,522,013 Data for Connecticut were added to the file after the file was prepared for the other states. Hence the reason “_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.

## Table VII **- 1 (continued)** 

124 **Description File Name**  **Format Date of**  **File used for**  **Version 3 Size** 

**(By tes)**  **Notes** Temporal profiles file containing state - specific onroad mobile source data for Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Mas sachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Vermont MANEVU_2002_mtpro_02022006_addCT.txt SM OKE 2/22/2006 23,122 Data for Connecticut were added to the file after the file was prepared for the other states. Hence the reason “_addCT” is included at the end of the file name.

**Spatial/Gridding** Spreadsheet summary generated for area source gridding review MANE -VU_agref_review.xls 8/31/2004 1,607,680 Spatial profile cross reference file amgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt SM OKE 8/31/2004 89,860 Gridding surrogate cross - reference file amgref_us_051704_manevu_added SM OKE 5/17/2004 35,825 Based on the surrogate cross - reference file downloaded from the EPA/CHIEF site that corresponds to the gridding surrogates file. However, several MANE -VU - specific additions included in "amgref.m3.us+can+mex.manevu.082404.txt" for Version 1 were added to the gridding - cross reference file downloaded from EPA. These are cross - references for SCCs 2806010000, 2806015000, 2870000011, 2870000015, 2870000021, and 2870000 022. Modeling grid (12 - km) amgpro.12km_041604.otc12.us.txt SM OKE 4/16/2004 150,689,358 Based on downloaded 12 - km EPA gridding surrogates windowed for the OTC domain **Speciation Profiles** Spreadsheet summary generated for area source speciation review MA NE -VU_asref_review.xls Excel 8/31/2004 5,626,880 Speciation profiles file for CB - IV gspro.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SM OKE 142,255 Speciation cross reference file for CB - IV gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt SM OKE 8/31/2004 786,998

## Table VII **- 1 (continued)** 

125 **Description File Name**  **Format Date of**  **File used for**  **Version 3 Size** 

**(By tes)**  **Notes** Speciation profile cross re ference assignment file gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.txt SM OKE 2/1/2005 754,302 This file is based on the file "gsref.cmaq.cb4p25.manevu.083104.txt" prepared for version 1 of the MANE -VU inventory. The only revision was to change the PM2_5 speciation profile # from its default 99999 to 35501 for some mobile source categories. This update had been done by either CENRAP or VISTAS in the speciation profiles they provided and the update had a more recent creation date than the MANE -VU files created for Version 1, so thi s appeared to be a refinement. Speciation profiles for REMSAD7 gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SM OKE 5/1/2005 532,990 Based on "gspro.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE, but added tagged species for REMSAD state - level sulfur tagging. Speciation cross referenc e for REMSAD7 gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt_tag SM OKE 5/1/2005 2,614,360 Based on "gsref.remsad7.cb4mpm.txt" in the SMOKE, but added tagged species for REMSAD state - level sulfur tagging. Transport fractions for fugitive dust gcntl.xportfrac.txt SM OKE 2/1/200 4 124,495 File obtained from input file EPA used to adjust for PM transport for modeling of Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR).

## C - 126 **Table VII -** **2. Point Source Temporal Cross -**  **reference A dditions**  **State FIPS**  **SCC Recommended profiles**  **Method of assignment SCC D**  **escription (Complete description not alway s**  **available) Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  VT 50005 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;W ood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50019 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;W ood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50021 10200908 262 7 24 Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;W ood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50017 10300908 262 7 24 Use SCC=103009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Commercial/Institutional;W ood/Bark W aste;W ood fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) PA 42009 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42029 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42045 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;In dustrial;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42061 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42067 20200299 262 7 24 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42015 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42029 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42037 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 42071 20300299 262 7 24 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Unknown PA 4 2011 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments PA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classifi ed;Specify in Comments PA 42123 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments PA 42129 28888899 262 7 24 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments MD 24031 30500261 262 7 24 Use SCC=30500260 profile Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Asphalt Concrete;Drum Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer, Wa ste/Drain/#6 Oil - Fired

## Table VII **- 2 (continued)** 

127 **State FIPS**  **SCC Recommended profiles**  **Method of assignment SCC D**  **escription (Complete description not alway s**  **available) Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  NY 36055 31603001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Extrusion Operations NY 36055 31603002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and e valuate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Film Support Operations NY 36055 31604001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial P rocesses;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Manufacturing NY 36055 31604002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturin g;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Emulsion Making Operations NY 36055 31604003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Mixing Operations NY 36055 31605001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Surface Coating Operation s NY 36055 31605002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Grid Ionizers NY 36055 31605003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC =2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Corona Discharge Treatment NY 36055 31606001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;General Film Manufacturing NY 36055 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations PA 42101 31606002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Produ ct Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations NY 36055 31612001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operation s;Tank Cleaning Operations NY 36055 31612002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;General Cleaning Operations NY 36055 3 1613002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Storage Operations;General Storage Operations

## Table VII **- 2 (continued)** 

128 **State FIPS**  **SCC Recommended profiles**  **Method of assignment SCC D**  **escription (Complete description not alway s**  **available) Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  NY 36055 31614001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=27 96 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Filling Operations (non petroleum) NY 36055 31614002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and eva luate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Transfer of Chemicals NY 36055 31615001 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial P rocesses;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Separation Processes;Recovery Operations NY 36055 31615003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Supp ort Activities - Separation Processes;Distillation Operations NY 36055 31616002 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;General Process Tank Operations NY 36055 31616003 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Operations NY 3 6055 31616004 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC=2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Paint Spraying Operations NY 36055 31616006 262 7 24 Use SIC=3861 and SIC =2796 as guidance and evaluate specific sources Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Chemical W eighing Operations PA Numerous counties 39000698 262 7 24 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In - process Fuel Use;Natural Gas;Unknown NJ Numerous counties 39999901 262 7 24 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes;Unknown PA 42015 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown PA 42017 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown PA 42091 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown PA 42095 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Mis cellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown PA 42097 40202598 266 7 16 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts;Unknown PA 42013 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent E vaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown PA 42041 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown

## Table VII **- 2 (continued)** 

129 **State FIPS**  **SCC Recommended profiles**  **Method of assignment SCC D**  **escription (Complete description not alway s**  **available) Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  PA 42045 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC =404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants;Unknown PA 42071 40400299 262 7 24 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants;U nknown

## C - 130

**Table VII -** **3. Unknown SCCs in the MA NE**  **- VU Point Source Inventory**  **State FIPS**  **SCC Description**  PA 42101 24950002 Need more info: Unknown SCC PA 42061 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General PA 42091 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General PA 42133 40500299 Need more info:Printing/Publishing; General

## C - 131 **Table VII -** **4. A rea Source Temporal Cross**  **- Reference Updates**  **SCC SCC description**  **SMOKE Default profile New** **MANE -** **VU profile Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  **Monthly Weekly**  **Diurna l**  30502713 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sand

and Gravel;Screening: Size Classification 262 7 24 262 5 12 30502760 Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Industrial Sand

and Gravel;Sand Handling, Transfer, and Storage 262 7 24 262 5 12 2302000000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;All Processes;Total 262 7 26 262 7 250 2302050000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Bakery Products;Total 262 7 26 262 5 26 2305000000 Industrial Processes;Mineral Processes: SIC 32;All

Processes;Total 262 7 26 262 5 10 2309100010 Industrial Processes;Fabricated Metals: SIC 34;Coating,

Engraving, and Allied Services;Electroplating 262 7 26 262 5 10 2311010000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;General

Bui lding Construction;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2311020000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Heavy

Construction;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Road

Construction;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 232500000 0 Industrial Processes;Mining and Quarrying: SIC 14;All

Processes;Total 262 7 26 262 5 10 2399000000 Industrial Processes;Industrial Processes: NEC;Industrial

Processes: NEC;Total 262 7 26 262 5 10 2399010000 Industrial Processes; Industrial

Refrigeratio n; Refrigerant Losses; All Processes 262 7 26 262 5 10 2401015000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Factory Finished

Wo od: SIC 2426 thru 242;Total: All Solvent Types 173 7 26 173 5 26 2401020000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;W ood Furniture: SIC

2 5;Total: All Solvent Types 287 7 26 287 5 26 2401025000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Furniture: SIC

25;Total: All Solvent Types 287 7 26 287 5 26 2401030000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Paper: SIC 26;Total:

All Solvent Types 257 7 26 257 5 26 2401040000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Cans: SIC

341;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26 2401045000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Metal Coils: SIC

3498;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26 2401050000 Solvent Uti lization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous

Finished Metals: SIC 34 - (341 + 3498);Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26

## Table VII **- 4 (continued)** 

132 **SCC SCC description**  **SMOKE Default profile New** **MANE -** **VU profile Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  **Monthly Weekly**  **Diurna l**  2401055000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Machinery and

Equipment: SIC 35;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26 2401060000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Large Appliances:

SIC 363;Total: All Solvent Types 262 7 26 262 5 26 2401065000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Electronic and Other

Electrical: SIC 36 - 363;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26 2401070000 So lvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Motor Vehicles: SIC

371;Total: All Solvent Types 140 7 26 140 5 26 2401075000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Aircraft: SIC

372;Total: All Solvent Types 169 7 26 169 5 26 2401080000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coatin g;Marine: SIC

373;Total: All Solvent Types 266 7 26 266 5 26 2401085000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Railroad: SIC

374;Total: All Solvent Types 169 7 26 169 5 26 2401090000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous

Manufacturing;Total: All Solvent Types 260 7 26 260 5 26 2401090999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Miscellaneous

Manufacturing;Solvents: NEC 260 7 26 260 5 26 2401200000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Other Special

Purpose Coatings;Total: All Solvent Types 260 7 26 26 0 5 26 2401990000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface Coating

Categories;Total: All Solvent Types 260 7 26 260 5 26 2401990999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;All Surface Coating

Categories;Solvents: NEC 260 7 26 260 5 26 2415000000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Processes/All

Industries;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 26 2415020000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products

(SIC 34): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415025000 Solvent U tilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery and

Equipment (SIC 35): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415030000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415035000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment

(SIC 37): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415045000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous

Manufacturing (SIC 39): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Ty pes 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415055000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC

55): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415060000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous Repair

Services (SIC 76): All Processes;Total: A ll Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12

## Table VII **- 4 (continued)** 

133 **SCC SCC description**  **SMOKE Default profile New** **MANE -** **VU profile Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  **Monthly Weekly**  **Diurna l**  2415065000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC

75): All Processes;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 6 12 2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open Top

Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415105000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures

(SIC 25): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415110000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries

(SIC 33): Open To p Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415120000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products

(SIC 34): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415125000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Mach inery and

Equipment (SIC 35): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415135000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation Equipment

(SIC 37): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415140000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and Related

Products (SIC 38): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415145000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous

Manufacturing (SIC 39): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415200000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries:

Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415230000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): Conveyerized Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Cold

Cleaning;Total: A ll Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415305000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Furniture and Fixtures

(SIC 25): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415310000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Primary Metal Industries

(SIC 33): Cold Clean ing;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415320000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Fabricated Metal Products

(SIC 34): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415325000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Industrial Machinery and

Equip ment (SIC 35): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415330000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12

## Table VII **- 4 (continued)** 

134 **SCC SCC description**  **SMOKE Default profile New** **MANE -** **VU profile Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  **Monthly Weekly**  **Diurna l**  2415335000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Tran sportation Equipment

(SIC 37): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415340000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Instruments and Related

Products (SIC 38): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415345000 Solvent Utili zation;Degreasing;Miscellaneous

Manufacturing (SIC 39): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415355000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Automotive Dealers (SIC

55): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2415360000 So lvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC

75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 6 12 2415365000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Miscellaneous Repair

Services (SIC 76): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 7 26 253 5 12 2425000000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;All Processes;Total: All

Solvent Types 257 7 26 257 5 26 2425010000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Lithography;Total: All

Solvent Types 257 7 26 257 5 26 2425020000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Letterpress;Total: All

Solvent Types 257 7 26 257 5 26 2425030000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Rotogravure;Total: All

Solvent Types 262 7 26 262 5 26 2425040000 Solvent Utilization;Graphic Arts;Flexography;Total: All

Solvent Types 257 7 26 257 5 26 24300000 00 Solvent Utilization;Rubber/Plastics;All Processes;Total:

All Solvent Types 200 7 26 200 5 26 2601010000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;On - site

Incineration;Industrial;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2601020000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery; On - site

Incineration;Commercial/Institutional;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2610010000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Industrial;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2610020000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Commercial/Institutio nal;Total 262 7 26 262 5 12 2805020000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Total 489 7 26 1500 7 26 2805025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Hogs and Pigs W aste E missions;Total 489 7 26 1500 7 26 2805030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Total 489 7 26 1500 7 26

## Table VII **- 4 (continued)** 

135 **SCC SCC description**  **SMOKE Default profile New** **MANE -** **VU profile Monthly**  **Weekly Diurnal**  **Monthly Weekly**  **Diurna l**  2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Horses and Ponies W aste E missions;Total 262 7 26 1500 7 26 2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Sheep and Lambs W aste Emissions;Total 489 7 26 1500 7 26 2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats W aste Emiss ions;Total 489 7 26 262 7 24 2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other

Combustion;Prescribed Burning for Forest Management;Total 14 7 24 3 11 13

## C - 136 **Table VII -** **5. A rea Source Temporal Cross**  **- Reference A** **dditions SCC**  **Description Month**  **Week Diurnal**  210400 8002 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Fireplaces: Insert; non - EPA certified 485 7 26 2104008003 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; non - catalytic 485 7 26 2104008004 Stationary Source Fu el

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Fireplaces: Insert; EPA certified; catalytic 485 7 26 2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26 2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kin dred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20; Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26 2302080002 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Misce llaneous Food and Kindred Products;Refrigeration 262 7 26 2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural

Coatings - Solvent- based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural

Coatings - Wa te r- based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial

Maintenance Coatings - Solvent- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial

Maintenance Coatings -Wa ter- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 2415270000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufacturing

(except SIC 36): Vapor and In - Line Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12 2415280000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other

Elec. (SIC 36 ): Vapor and In - Line Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12 2415370000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Transportation

Equipment Repair Services: Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12 2415380000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Manufactur ing:

Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 253 5 12 2610000400 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;All Categories;Yard Waste - Brush Species Unspecified 262 7 26 2610000500 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;All Catego ries;Land Clearing Debris (use 28 - 10 - 005 - 000 for Logging Debris Burning) 262 7 26 2610040400 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Municipal (collected from residences, parks,other for central burn);Yard W aste - Total 262 7 26 2630020010 W aste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;W astewater Treatment;Public Owned;W astewater Treatment Processes Total 262 7 24

## Table VII **- 5 (continued)** 

137 **SCC Description**  **Month Week**  **Diurnal** 2630020020 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;W astewater Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24 2630020030 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;W astewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 2630050000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;W astewater Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 2680001000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Composting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All Processes 262 7 26 2680002000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Composting;Mixed W aste (e.g., a 50:50 mixture of biosolids a nd green wastes);All Processes 262 7 26 2801700011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Calcium Ammonium Nitrate 998 7 26 2801700012 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Applicat ion;Potassium Nitrate 998 7 26 2801700013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Diammonium Phosphate 998 7 26 2801700014 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Monoammon ium Phosphate 998 7 26 2801700015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Liquid Ammonium Polyphosphate 998 7 26 2801700099 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Miscella neous Fertilizers 998 7 26 2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Confinement 1500 7 26 2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;B eef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26 2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land application of manure 15 00 7 26 2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Not Elsewhere Classified 1500 7 26 2805003100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on pas ture/range;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805007200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Management 1500 7 26 2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Land application of manu re 262 7 24 2805007330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems; Land application 1500 7 26 2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Pou ltry Production - layers with dry manure management systems; Land application 1500 7 26

## Table VII **- 5 (continued)** 

138 **SCC Description**  **Month Week**  **Diurnal** 2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Confinement 1500 7 26 28050082 00 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26 2805008300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry producti on - layers with wet manure management systems;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805009300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricul ture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24 2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Source s;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24 2805010300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805018000 M iscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle composite; Not Elsewhere Classified 1501 7 26 2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805019200 M iscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26 2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of manure 15 00 7 26 2805020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Milk Cows 1500 7 26 2805020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Beef Cows 15 00 7 26 2805020003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Cattle and Calves Waste Emissions;Heifers and Heifer Calves 1500 7 26 2805021300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;La nd application of manure 1500 7 26 2805022100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805022200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep p it dairy;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26 2805022300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - deep pit dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805023300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Live stock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805030001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Pullet Chicks and Pullets less than 13 weeks old 1500 7 26

## Table VII **- 5 (continued)** 

139 **SCC Description**  **Month Week**  **Diurnal** 2805030002 Miscella neous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Pullets 13 weeks old and older but less than 20 weeks 1500 7 26 2805030003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Layers 1500 7 26 2805030004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Broilers 1500 7 26 2805030008 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry W aste Emissions;Geese 1500 7 26 2805039100 Miscellaneou s Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure handling and storage 1500 7 26 2805039300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805045000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats W aste Em issions;Not Elsewhere Classified 1500 7 26 2805045002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats W aste Emissions;Angora Goats 1500 7 26 2805045003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats W aste Emission s;Milk Goats 1500 7 26 2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep - pit house operations;Confinement 1500 7 26 2805047300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep - pit house operations;Land application of manure 1500 7 26 2805053100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations; Confinement 1500 7 26 2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Produ ction -

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros W aste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classified 262 7 24 2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals

Wa ste Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24 2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals

Wa ste Emiss ions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 2807020001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Bears;Black Bears 262 7 26 2807020002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Bears;Grizzly Bears 262 7 26 2807025000 Miscellaneous Area Sources; Wi ld Animals W aste

Emissions;Elk;Total 262 7 26 2807030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 26 2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 26 2810060100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other

Combustion;Cremation;Humans 262 7 24 2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration

and Perspiration;Total 262 7 24 2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Diapered

Wa ste;Total 262 7 24 2870000011 Miscellaneous Area S ources;Domestic

Activity;Household Products;Total 262 7 24

## Table VII **- 5 (continued)** 

140 **SCC Description**  **Month Week**  **Diurnal** 2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Non agricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24 2870000021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic

Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 2870000022 Miscellane ous Area Sources;Domestic

Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24 2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24

## C - 141

**Table VII -** **6. A rea Source Temporal Cross**  **- Reference and Profile A** **dditions for**  **the MA**  **NE -** **VU Inventory** SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2102002000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Industrial;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: All Boiler Types 1726 8 26 10000 2102006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Natural

Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1727 8 26 10000 2102007000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Industrial;Liquified

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Boiler Types 1727 8 26 10000 2103001000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Anthracite Coal;Total: All Boiler Types 1720 8 26 10000 21 03004000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Distillate Oil;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1721 8 26 10000 2103006000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas;Total: Boilers and IC Engines 1722 8 26 1000 0 2103007000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Commercial/Institutional;Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 1723 8 26 10000 2104002000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal;Total: All Combustor Types 1732 7 26 10000 2104004000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Distillate

Oil;Total: All Combustor Types 1733 7 26 10000 2104006000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Natural

Gas;Total: All Combustor Types 1734 7 26 10000 21040 07000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;Liquified

Petroleum Gas (LPG);Total: All Combustor Types 1735 7 26 10000 2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;W ood;Total:

Wo odstoves and Fireplaces 1740 2007 2014 10001 2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;W ood;Total:

Wo odstoves and Fireplaces 1741 2008 2015 10003 2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel Combustion;Residential;W ood;Total:

Wo odstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005 2104008000 Stationary Source Fuel C ombustion;Residential;W ood;Total:

Wo odstoves and Fireplaces 1742 2009 2016 10005 2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Outdoor Wo od Burning Equipment; 1743 2010 2017 10001 2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Outdoor Wo od Burning Equipment; 1744 2011 2017 10003 2104008070 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;W ood;Outdoor Wo od Burning Equipment; 1745 2012 2017 10005 2104011000 Stationary Source Fuel

Combustion;Residential;Kerosene;Total: All Heate r Types 1736 7 26 10000 2294000000 Mobile Sources;Paved Roads;All Paved Roads;Total:

Fugitives 1729 7 26 10000 2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000 2302002100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Conveyorized Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000 2302002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

142 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2302 002200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Charbroiling;Under-fired Charbroiling 262 7 26 10000 2302003000 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000 2302003000 Ind ustrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Total 262 7 26 10000 2302003100 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000 2302003100 Industrial Proc esses;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Flat Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000 2302003200 Industrial Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000 2302003200 Industri al Processes;Food and Kindred Products: SIC

20;Commercial Deep Fat Frying;Clamshell Griddle Frying 262 7 26 10000 2311030000 Industrial Processes;Construction: SIC 15 - 17;Road

Construction;Total 262 7 9 10000 2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coati ng;Architectural Coatings -

Solvent- based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 - 9 2401002000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings -

Solvent- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000 2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;A rchitectural Coatings -

Wa ter- based;Total: All Solvent Types 467 7 26 - 9 2401003000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Architectural Coatings -

Wa ter- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 20 27 10000 2401005000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refi nishing: SIC

7532;Total: All Solvent Types 1702 5 27 10000 2401005500 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC

7532;Surface Preparation Solvents 1702 5 27 10000 2401005600 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC

7532;Primers 1702 5 27 10000 2401005700 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC

7532;Top Coats 1702 5 27 10000 2401005800 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC

7532;Clean - up Solvents 1702 5 27 10000 2401005800 Solvent Util ization;Surface Coating;Auto Refinishing: SIC

7532;Clean - up Solvents 1702 5 27 10001 2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Total: All

Solvent Types 1700 7 26 - 9 2401008000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Total: All

Solvent Types 1700 5 26 10000 2401008999 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Traffic Markings;Solvents:

NEC 1700 7 26 - 9 2401102000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance

Coatings - Solvent- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 2 6 10000 2401103000 Solvent Utilization;Surface Coating;Industrial Maintenance

Coatings -Wa ter- based;Total: All Solvent Types 500 5 26 10000 2415100000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Open Top

Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 1000 0 2415130000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Electronic and Other Elec.

(SIC 36): Open Top Degreasing;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000 2415300000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;All Industries: Cold

Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 6 5 10000 24 15360000 Solvent Utilization;Degreasing;Auto Repair Services (SIC

75): Cold Cleaning;Total: All Solvent Types 262 5 5 10000 2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10001 2 461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10001 2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 1000 3

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

143 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1712 7 26 10003 2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1714 7 26 10005 2461021000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Cutback Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1713 7 26 10005 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 170 9 7 26 10001 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1711 7 26 10001 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1710 7 26 10003 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1709 7 26 10003 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: A ll Solvent Types 1711 7 26 10005 2461022000 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Emulsified Asphalt;Total: All Solvent Types 1710 7 26 10005 2461850001 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Applica tion: Agricultural;Herbicides, Corn 536 7 26 10000 2461850005 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herbicides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000 2461850006 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industria l:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Herbicides, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000 2461850051 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other Pesticides, Corn 536 7 26 10000 2461850055 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other Pesticides, Soy Beans 536 7 26 10000 2461850056 Solvent Utilization;Miscellaneous Non - industrial:

Commercial;Pesticide Application: Agricultural;Other Pesticid es, Hay & Grains 536 7 26 10000 2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000 2501011010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000 2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000 2501011011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Stora ge;Portable Containers: Residential;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000 2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000 2501011012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000 2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501011015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Pet roleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000 2501011016 Storage and Transport;Petrol eum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Residential;Transport 1701 7 26 10000 2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000 2501012010 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Vapor Losses 1701 7 26 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

144 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000 2501012011 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Permeation 1701 7 26 10000 2501012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000 25 01012012 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Diurnal 1701 7 26 10000 2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10 000 2501012015 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 170 1 7 26 10000 2501012016 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Portable Containers: Commercial;Transport 1701 7 26 10000 2501060000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Total: All Gasoline/All Processes 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060051 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Submerged Filling 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060052 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Splash Filling 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060053 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 1: Balanced Submerged Filling 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060100 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and P etroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Total 1724 7 26 10000 2501060101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Uncontrolled 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060102 Storage a nd Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Displacement Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 2 6 - 9 2501060201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Underground Tank: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 - 9 2501060204 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Statio ns;Stage 2: Off - Highway Equipment Displacement Loss/Controlled 1701 7 26 10000 2501060205 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Gasoline Service Stations;Stage 2: Off- Highway Equipment Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501080050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports : Aviation Gasoline;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501080102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Displacement Loss 1701 7 26 100 00 2501080103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501080201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Aviation Gasoline;Underground Tan k: Breathing and Emptying 1701 7 26 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

145 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2501090050 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP - 8;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501090060 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: J et A or JP - 8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501090070 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Jet Naphtha or JP -4;Stage 1: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501090080 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Air ports: Jet Naphtha or JP -4;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501090101 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Airports: Jet A or JP - 8;Stage 2: Total 1701 7 26 10000 2501090102 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Sto rage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Displacement Loss 1701 7 26 10000 2501090103 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Stage 2: Spillage 1701 7 26 10000 2501090201 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Storage;Marinas: Gasoline;Underground Tank: Emptying and Breathing 1701 7 26 10000 2505000000 Storage and Transport;Petroleum and Petroleum Product

Transport;All Transport Types;Total: All Products 1701 7 26 - 9 2610010000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;Open

Burning;Industrial;Total 262 9 2013 10000 2630020000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;W astewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Total Processed 262 7 24 10000 2630020010 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;W astewater

Treatment;Public Ow ned; Wa stewater Treatment Processes Total 262 7 24 10000 2630020020 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;W astewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Biosolids Processes Total 262 7 24 10000 2630020030 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;W astewater

Treatment; Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000 2630050000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery;W astewater

Treatment;Public Owned;Land Application - Digested Sludge 262 7 24 10000 2680001000 Wa ste Disposal, Treatment, and

Recovery;Compo sting;100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls);All Processes 262 7 26 10000 2730100000 Natural Sources;Geogenic; Wi nd Erosion;Total 1704 7 26 10000 2801001001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Corn;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801001005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops; Wh eat;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801001009 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801001013 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801001017 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801001021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Land preparation and cultivation 1703 20 132 10000 2801002001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;C orn;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000 2801002002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops; Wh eat;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000 2801002003 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Barley;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000 2801002004 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Soybeans;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000 2801002005 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Hay/Alfalfa;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000 2801002006 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Crops;Vegetables;Harvesting 1703 20 132 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

146 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2801700020 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Corn 1705 7 26 10000 2801700021 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilize r Application;Sorghum 1705 7 26 10000 2801700022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Wheat 1705 7 26 10000 2801700023 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Barley 1 705 7 26 10000 2801700024 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Soybeans 1705 7 26 10000 2801700025 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Hay/Alfalfa 1705 7 26 10000 2801700026 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Crops;Fertilizer Application;Vegetables 1705 7 26 10000 2805001100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Con finement 1706 7 24 10000 2805001200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Manure handling 1706 7 24 10000 2805001300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land application of 1706 7 24 10000 2805001310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 100 00 2805001320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000 2805001330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finish ing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000 2805001340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle - finishing operations on feedlots (drylots);Land Appl 1706 7 24 10000 2805002000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Beef Cattle Composite; Total 1706 7 24 10000 2805007100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000 2805007 200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Man 262 7 24 10000 2805007300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with dry manure management systems;Land applicati 262 7 24 10000 2805007340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with dry manure management systems;Lan 262 7 24 10000 2805008100 Miscellaneous Area Sources; Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Confinement 262 7 24 10000 2805008200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - layers with wet manure management systems;Manure handlin 262 7 24 10000 2805008310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000 2805008320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - layers with wet manure management systems;Lan 1708 7 24 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

147 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2805009100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Confinement 262 7 24 10000 2805009200 Miscellaneous Are a Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - broilers;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24 10000 2805009330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000 2805009340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - broilers;Land Application of solid manure wit 1708 7 24 10000 2805010100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poul try production - turkeys;Confinement 262 7 24 10000 2805010200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Poultry production - turkeys;Manure handling and storage 262 7 24 10000 2805010330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of solid manure with 1708 7 24 10000 2805010340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Poultry Production - turkeys;Land Application of solid manure with 1708 7 24 1000 0 2805019100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000 2805019200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000 2805019300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - flush dairy;Land application of manure 1706 7 24 10000 2805019310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - fl ush dairy;Land Application of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000 2805019320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of liquid manure witho 1706 7 24 10000 2805019330 Miscellaneous Area So urces;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid manure with i 1706 7 24 10000 2805019340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - flush dairy;Land Application of solid man ure withou 1706 7 24 10000 2805021100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000 2805021200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - scrape dai ry;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000 2805021310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000 2805021320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of liquid manure with 1706 7 24 10000 2805021330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid manure with 1706 7 2 4 10000 2805021340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - scrape dairy;Land Application of solid manure witho 1706 7 24 10000 2805023100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - d rylot/pasture dairy;Confinement 1706 7 24 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

148 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2805023200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Dairy cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Manure handling and storage 1706 7 24 10000 2805023310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000 2805023320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of liquid man 1706 7 24 10000 2805023330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000 2805023340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Dairy Cattle - drylot/pasture dairy;Land Application of solid manu 1706 7 24 10000 2805035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Horses and Ponies W aste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000 2805038100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Confineme 1707 7 24 10000 2805038200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Manure ha 1707 7 24 10000 2805038300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons (unspecified animal age);Land appl 1707 7 24 10000 2805039100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Lives tock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000 2805039200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - operations with lagoons;Manure handling and storage 1707 7 24 10000 2805039310 Miscell aneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000 2805039320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000 2805039330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000 2805039340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Produ ction -

Livestock;Swine Production - operations with lagoon (unspecified animal age) 1707 7 24 10000 2805040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Sheep and Lambs W aste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000 2805045001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Goats W aste Emissions;Total 262 7 24 10000 2805046100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep - pit house operations (unspecified animal age);Confine 1707 7 24 10000 2805046300 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - deep - pit house operations (unspecified animal age);Land ap 1707 7 24 10000 2805047100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine product ion - deep - pit house operations;Confinement 1707 7 24 10000 2805047200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

149 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2805047310 Miscellaneous Area Sources ;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000 2805047320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified ani mal a 1707 7 24 10000 2805047330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000 2805047340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;S wine Production - deep pit house operations (unspecified animal a 1707 7 24 10000 2805052100 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations (unspecified animal age);Confinement 1707 7 24 10000 28050531 00 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agriculture Production -

Livestock;Swine production - outdoor operations; Confinement 1707 7 24 10000 2805053200 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecifie d animal age);Man 1707 7 24 10000 2805053310 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000 2805053320 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000 2805053330 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000 280 5053340 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;Swine Production - outdoor operations (unspecified animal age);Lan 1707 7 24 10000 2805054000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Agricultural Production -

Livestock;"Mules; Donkeys; and Burros Wa ste Emissions";Not Elsewhere Classif 262 7 24 10000 2806010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals W aste

Emissions;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000 2806015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals W aste

Emissions;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000 2807 030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000 2807040000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals W aste

Emissions;Birds;Total 262 7 24 10000 2810010000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Human

Perspirati on and Respiration;Total 1739 2006 24 10000 2810015000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Prescribed

Burning for Forest Management;Total 1731 7 24 10000 2810030000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Structure

Fires;Total 1715 7 24 10000 2810035000 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Other Combustion;Firefighting

Training;Total 1716 2004 24 10000 2870000001 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Respiration and

Perspiration;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000002 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Humans;Infant Dia pered

Wa ste;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000011 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Household

Products;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000015 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Activity;Non agricultural Fertilizers;Total 3 7 24 10000

## Table VII **- 6 (continued)** 

150 SCC Description Month We ek Diurnal FIPS 2870000021 Miscellan eous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Dogs;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000022 Miscellaneous Area Sources;Domestic Animals;Cats;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000031 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals;Deer;Total 262 7 24 10000 2870000032 Miscellaneous Area Sources;W ild Animals;Birds;Total 1728 7 24 10000

## C - 151

**Table VII -** **7. Point Source Speciation Profiles A dded to Speciation Cross**  ****

**reference File for CB -**  **IV with PM Mechanism**

**State FIPS**  **SCC Recommended**  **Profiles Method of** 

**As signment**  **SCC Description (Complete descript**  **ion not alway s available)**  **VOC PM**  **2.5** VT 50005 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50019 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50021 10200908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=102009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Industrial;Wood/Bark Wa ste;W ood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) VT 50017 10300908 1084 NWWAS Use SCC=103009XX profiles External Combustion Boilers;Commercial/Institutional;Wood/Bark Waste;Wood -fired Boiler - Dry W ood (<20% moisture) PA 42009 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Indu strial;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42029 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42045 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42061 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42067 20200299 0007 22004 Use SCC=202002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Industrial;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42015 20300299 0007 2 2004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42029 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42037 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42071 20300299 0007 22004 Use SCC=203002XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Commercial/Institutional;Natural Gas; Unknown PA 42011 28888899 90 02 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify i n Comments PA 42123 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emissions;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments PA 42129 28888899 9002 35602 Use SCC=288888XX profiles Internal Combustion Engines;Fugitive Emission s;Other Not Classified;Specify in Comments MD 24031 30500261 0025 22035 Use SCC=30500260 profile Industrial Processes;Mineral Products;Asphalt Concrete;Drum Mix Plant: Rotary Drum Dryer/Mixer, Waste/Drain/#6 Oil - Fired PA Numerous counties 39000698 0000 2 2004 Use SCC=39000699 profile Industrial Processes;In - process Fuel Use;Natural Gas; Unknown NJ Numerous counties 39999901 9003 22054 Use SCC=399999XX profiles Industrial Processes;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries;Miscellaneous Industrial Processes; Un known PA 42015 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts; Unknown PA 42017 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coa ting Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts; Unknown PA 42091 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts; Unknown PA 42095 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile P etroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts; Unknown PA 42097 40202598 1003 99999 Use SCC=40202599 profile Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Surface Coating Operations;Miscellaneous Metal Parts; Unknown PA 42013 40 400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants; Unknown PA 42041 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage ( non - Refinery);Bulk Plants; Unknown PA 42045 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and Solvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants; Unknown PA 42071 40400299 1014 22042 Use SCC=404002XX profiles Petroleum and S olvent Evaporation;Petroleum Liquids Storage (non - Refinery);Bulk Plants; Unknown

## C - 152

**Table VII -** **8. Point Source SCCs Lacking Speciation Profile A ssignments for CB**  **- IV**  **with PM Mechanism State**  **FIPS SCC**  **Description** NY 36055 31603001 Industrial Processes;Photog raphic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Extrusion Operations NY 36055 31603002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Substrate Preparation;Film Support Operations NY 36055 31604001 In dustrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Manufacturing NY 36055 31604002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Emulsion Making Operations NY 36055 31604003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Chemical Preparation;Chemical Mixing Operations NY 36055 31605001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface T reatments;Surface Coating Operations NY 36055 31605002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Surface Treatments;Grid Ionizers NY 36055 31605003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufactur ing - Surface Treatments;Corona Discharge Treatment NY 36055 31606001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;General Film Manufacturing NY 36055 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Ma nufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations PA 42101 31606002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Product Manufacturing - Finishing Operations;Cutting/Slitting Operations NY 36055 31612001 Industr ial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;Tank Cleaning Operations NY 36055 31612002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Cleaning Operations;General Cleaning Operations NY 36055 31613002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Storage Operations;General Storage Operations NY 36055 31614001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operation s;Filling Operations (non petroleum) NY 36055 31614002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Material Transfer Operations;Transfer of Chemicals NY 36055 31615001 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Sup port Activities - Separation Processes;Recovery Operations NY 36055 31615003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Separation Processes;Distillation Operations NY 36055 31616002 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film M anufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;General Process Tank Operations NY 36055 31616003 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Miscellaneous Manufacturing Operations NY 36055 31616004 Indus trial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Paint Spraying Operations NY 36055 31616006 Industrial Processes;Photographic Film Manufacturing;Support Activities - Other Operations;Chemical W eighing Operations

## 153

**T able VII**  **- 9. Summary of Version 3 Mass Emissions and SMOKE Input Files** 

**S/L A gencies Included**  **in Files NIF 3.0 File Name** 

**Containing Mass Emissions Inventory**  **(A ccess 2000 Database** 

**Files) Temporal Period of** 

**Mass Emissions Inventory**  **SMOKE Input File Name Tem**  **poral Period of Emissions in**  **SMOKE/IDA**

**File Point Source Inventory**  CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA (state and Philadelphia, and Allegheny Counties), RI, VT MANEVU_2002_Pt_Versi on 3_040706.mdb Annual, Summer Day, and W inter Day MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_I N

PUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERD AY_042706.txt Annual and Summer Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_IN PUT_ANNUAL_

WIN TERDA Y_042706.txt Annual and Winter Day **Ar ea Source Inventory**  CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT MANEVU_2002_Area_04 0606.mdb Annual, Summer Day, Wi nter Day, and Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I

NPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMER DAY_040606.txt Annual, Summer Day, and Average Day

“ “ “ MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_I NPUT_ANNUAL_

WIN TERD AY_040606.txt Annual, Winter Day, and Average Day **Nonroad Source Inventory** CT, DC, DE, MA, MD , ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT MANEVU_NRD2002_NIF _030306.mdb Annual MANEVU_NRD2002_SMOK E_030306.ida Annual **Onroad Source Inventory**

CT CT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb Annual DE DE2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual DC DC2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual ME ME2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual MD MD2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb Annual MA MA2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000.md

b MA2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NH NH2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual NJ NJ2002MANEVUORCAP

_022006_Access2000 .md

b NJ2002MANEVUORCAP _022006_Access97.mdb Annual

NY NY2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual PA PA2002MANEVUORCAP

_072004.mdb Annual RI DRI2002MANEVUORCA

P_072004.mdb Annual VT VT2002MANEVUORCAP

_122004.mdb Annual CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY , PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mbinv_020 22006.txt CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mcref_0202 2006.txt

## 154

**S/L A gencies Included**  **in Files NIF 3.0 File Name** 

**Containing Mass Emissions Inventory**  **(A ccess 2000 Database** 

**Files) Temporal Period of** 

**Mass Emissions Inventory**  **SMOKE Input File Name Tem**  **poral Period of Emissions in**  **SMOKE/IDA**

**File** DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtpro_0202 2006.txt DE, MA, MD, NJ, NY, PA,

VT MANEVU_2002_mtref_0202 2006.txt CT , DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_mvref_0202 2006.txt CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT MANEVU_2002_vmtmix_02 022006.txt MANEVU_2002_mcodes.txt CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdpro.txt CT, NY MANEVU_2002_spdref.txt CT, DC, DE, MA, MD, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI,

VT SMOKE MOBILE6 input files—too numerous to list individually 

## Table VII **- 10. Unique List of Start Date, End Date, and Emission Type**  **Combinations for Daily Emissions in the MA**  **NE -** **VU 2002 Point and A rea S**  **ource Inv** **entories, Version 3** Start Date End Date Emission Type Emission

Type Period Season

Designation SMOKE File Point Source Inventory 20011201 20020228 27 NONANNUAL Wi nter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 20011201 20020228 29 NONANNUAL Wi nter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 20020101 20020331 27 NONANNUAL Wi nter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt 20020101 20021231 29 NONANNUAL MD -Wi nter MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_042706.txt VT - Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 20020501 20020930 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 20020601 20020831 27 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 20 020601 20020831 29 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt 20020601 20020831 30 NONANNUAL Summer MANEVU_Point_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_042706.txt Area Source Inventory 20020101 20020831 27 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AR EA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20020101 20021231 29 Daily Average Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt and MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20020401 20020930 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020401 20021031 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020512 20020512 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMM ERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020831 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020601 20020929 29 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_ INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20020629 20020629 27 Daily Summer Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_SUMMERDAY_040606.txt 20011201 20020228 27 Daily Wi nter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20011201 20020228 29 Daily Wi nte r Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021029 20021029 27 Daily Wi nter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021104 20021104 27 Daily Wi nter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt 20021205 200212 05 27 Daily Wi nter Day MANEVU_AREA_SMOKE_INPUT_ANNUAL_WINTERDAY_040606.txt

## 155

**CHAPTER VIII. METHODS FOR AREAS OU**  **TSIDE OF THE MANE -** **VU REGION** Figure VIII - 1 shows the geographic area for which the 12 -kilometer (km) CMAQ modeling domain was used to support air quality modeling for the MANE -VU region. The 36 -km domain definition was used for geographical areas outside of the area shown in Figure VIII- 1. Table VIII - 1 identifies the geographic region as well as the ty pes of emissions inventory and ancillary data used to in modeling for the MANE - VU region. The geographic areas for which data were obtained include the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VI STAS), Central Regional Air Planning Organization (CENRAP), and WRAP RPOs, the Midwest RPO, Canada, and Mexico.

**Figure VIII -**  **1. MA NE**  **- VU 12**  **- Kilometer CMA** **Q Modeling Domain**

## 156

**Table VIII -**  **1. Description of Non -**  **MA NE**  **- VU Region Inventor** **y Data Used for MA NE**  **- VU BaseB Modeling** 

* Only utilized for 2002 BaseA 36 - km modeling to generate boundary conditions for BaseA/BaseA1/BaseB current and future year 12 - km modeling. **Geographical Region/RPO**  **Raw Data**  **Time Period and Version**  **Number Raw** **Data**

**Format Source of Data**  **Source of Ancillary Data**  **Date Data and Summaries Obtained by** 

**MA NE**  **- VU Mo**  **delers** VISTAS Point, area,

nonroad, and mobile 2002 BaseG SM OKE IDA Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics June/July 2006 MRPO Point, area,

nonroad, and mobile 2002 BaseK SM OKE IDA NIF files provided by Mark Janssen, MRPO, an d converted to IDA format by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics Ma y 2006

CENRAP Point, area,

nonroad, and mobile 2002 BaseB SM OKE IDA CENRAP ftp site Lee Wa rden, Oklahoma DEQ CENRAP ftp site Lee Wa rden, Oklahoma DEQ March 2006 WR AP * Point, area,

nonroad, and mobile Part of

VISTAS 2002 BaseD SM OKE IDA Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics Part of VISTAS 2002 BaseD provided by Gregory Stella, Alpine Geophysics January 2005
Canada Area, nonroad

and mobile 2000 SM OKE IDA ftp://ftp.epa.gov/EmisInventory /canada_2000inventory SM OKE 2.1 defaults February 2005

Point 2002 SM OKE IDA crea ted by NYSDEC from Canadian NPRI database http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/npri/n

pri_home_e.cfm SM OKE 2.1 defaults Ma y 2005

Me xico * Point, area,

nonroad and mobile 1999 SM OKE IDA EPA CAIR NODA SM OKE 2.1 defaults February 2005

## 157

**CHAPTER IX. REFERENCES**  CAMD, 2004: 2002 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data Files downloaded on July 8, 2004 from the EPA’s Clean Air Markets Division’s web site (www.epa.gov/ airmarkets ). [Note: The files can be found b y clicking on Data and Maps on the left panel of the screen, then on Data Sets and Published Reports, and then on the first item on the list, Emissions Data Prepackaged Datasets (http://cfpub.epa.gov/gdm/index.cfm?fuseaction= prepackaged.select). Year 2002 data for the quarterly time period was selected and then “Display List” that provides 48 data sets (comma delimited text format) that were downloaded one b y one and combined into a single dataset.] EPA, 2002: Final Summary of the Development and Results of a Methodology for Calculating Area Source Emissions from Residential Fuel Combustion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2002. (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html). EPA, 2003a: Enhanced Particulate Matter Controlled Emissions Calculator, User’s Manual, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Factor and Inventory Group, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. September 2003. EPA, 2003b: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Documentation for A ircraft, Commercial Marine, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory, prepared by Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2003. EPA, 2004a: Basic Format & Content Checker 3.0 (Formerly known as the Quality Assurance / Quality Control Software 3.0) - March 2004; Extended Quality Control Tool - Updated May 18, 2004. Available at the following EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/nif/index.html#nei . EPA, 2004b: NEIQuality Assurance and Data Augmentation for Point Sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division, Emission Factor and Inventory

Group, May 26, 2004. EPA, 2004c: Factor Information and REtrieval (FIRE) Data S ystem, Version 6.24, located on the Technology

Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emission Factors Web Site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/fire/index.html . March 2004. EPA, 2005a. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final NONROAD2005 [computer software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI. Available December 2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonroadmdl.htm .

## 158

EPA, 2005b. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Mobile Inventory Model, NMIM2005 [computer software], Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI . Available De cember 2005 at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nmim.htm . ERG, 2004: Environmental Research Group, Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine, Locomotive, and Other Nonroad Components of the National Emissio ns Inventory, technical memorandum prepared b y Eastern Research Group, Morrisville, NC, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 2004. MANE -VU, 2003: Quality Assurance Plan for Development of a 2002 Mobile Source Emissions Inventory

for the MANE -VU States, Final. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE -VU). January 31, 2003. MANE -VU, 2004a: Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for Area and Point Source Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Final. Prepared b y E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. and Carolina Environmental Program for the MidAtlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE - VU). August 3, 2004. MANE -VU, 2004b: Summary of Approaches Available for Fugitive Dust Sources, Final. Prepared b y E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE -VU). July 15, 2004. MANE -VU, 2004c: Summary of Approaches Available for Wildfires, Prescribed Burning, Slash Burning, and Agricultural Field Burning, Draft. Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE -VU). July

24, 2004. MANE -VU, 2005: Area and Point Source Emissions Modeling Inventory Project, Prepared by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. for the Mid- Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE VU). January

31, 2005. Thompson, 2002: Thompson, Rhonda L ., “A Demonstration of the Quality Assurance (QA) software specifically

developed for the National Emission Inventory (NEI),” presented at the International Emission Inventory Conference “Emission Inventories - Partnering for the Future,” Atlanta, GA, April 15 - 18, 2002, (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ ei11/qa/thompson.pdf

). WRAP, 2005: Western Governors’ Association, Western Regional Air Partnership, “Analysis of the Fine Fraction of Particulate Matter in Fugitive Dust,” Final Report, October 12, 2005 (http://www.wra

pair.org/forums/dejf/index.html).

## A- 1 **APPENDIX A POINT SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3:**  **DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT**

[NOTE: The Appendix A table for each State is provided in a separate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files are provided in the zip file named “Appendix A.zip”; this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]

## B - 1 **APPENDIX B AREA SOURCE INVENTORY** **, VERSION 3: DATA SOURCES BY SCC, EMISSION TYPE PERIOD, AND POLLUTANT** 

[NOTE: The Appendix B table for each State is provided in a separate MS Word file because of the large size of each table. The Word files are provided in the zip file named “App endix B.zip”; this zip file also includes an Excel Workbook file that contains the spreadsheet from which the Word file was created for each State.]

## C - 1 **APPENDIX C NONROAD SOURCE INVENTORY, VERSION 3:**  **FINAL COUNTY, MONTHLY NATIONAL MOBILE INVENTORY MODEL (** **NMIM) INPUTS**
**CONTENTS** CONNECTICUT ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ C - 2 DELAWARE ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. C - 2 DI STRICT O F COLUMBIA ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... C - 3 MAINE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... C - 3 MARYLAND ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. C - 4 MASSACHUSETTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... C - 6 NEW HAMPSHIRE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... C - 7 NEW JERSEY ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ C - 7 NEW YORK ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... C - 9 PENNSYLVANIA ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... C - 13 RHODE I SLAND ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... C - 17 VERMONT ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... C - 18

## C - 2 **Table C -**  **1. MA NE**  **- VU County, Monthly NMIM/NONRO**  **AD Inputs FIPS_State**  **State FIPS_County**  **County JAN**  **FEB MAR**  **APR MAY**  **JUN JUL**  **AUG SEP**  **OCT NOV**  **DEC 09**  

## CONNECTICUT **RVP, psi** 001 Fairfield County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 003 Hartford County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 005 Litchfield County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 007 Middlesex County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 009 N ew Haven County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 011 New London County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 013 Tolland County 12.3 12.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 015 Windham County 12.3 1 2.3 10.0 10.0 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.0 10.0 12.3 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Fairfield County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 003 Hartford County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6 596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 005 Litchfield County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 007 Middlesex County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 009 New Haven County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 011 New London County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 013 Tolland County 1.5667 1.5 667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 015 Windham County 1.5667 1.5667 1.6068 1.6068 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6596 1.6068 1.6068 1.5667 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Fairfield County 135.0 135.0 135 .0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 003 Hartford County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 005 Litchfield County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 007 Middlesex County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 009 New Haven County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 011 New London County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106. 0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 013 Tolland County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 015 Windham County 135.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 106.0 135.0 135.0 135.0 

### 10 

## DELAWARE **RVP, psi** 001 Kent County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 003 New Castle County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 005 Sussex County 13.4 13.4 10.4 10.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 10.4 10.4 13.4 **Oxygen Weight P ercent**  001 Kent County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 003 New Castle County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 005 Sussex County 1 .4645 1.4645 1.5538 1.5538 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.6431 1.5538 1.5538 1.4645 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 003 New Castle County 174.0 174.0 155.1 15 5.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 005 Sussex County 225.0 225.0 186.0 186.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 134.0 186.0 186.0 225.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 3 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **11** 

## DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA **RVP, psi** 001 District of Columbia 13.1 13.1 10.4 10.4 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.4 13.1 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 District of Columbia 1.7681 1.7681 1.8217 1.8217 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8932 1.8217 1.7681 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 District of Columbia 230.0 230.0 199.6 199.6 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 199.6 230.0 

### 23 

## MAINE **RVP, psi** 001 Androscoggin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 003 Aroostook County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8. 6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 005 Cumberland County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 007 Franklin County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 009 Hancock County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 1 0.3 11.6 011 Kennebec County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 013 Knox County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 015 Lincoln County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 017 Oxford County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 019 Penobscot County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 021 Piscataquis County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 023 Sagadahoc County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7 .5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 025 Somerset County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 027 Waldo County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 029 Washington County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.4 9.7 10.7 10 .3 11.6 031 York County 12.3 11.1 11.2 8.4 7.5 7.5 7.7 7.3 9.7 10.7 10.3 11.6 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Androscoggin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 003 Aroostook County 0. 4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 005 Cumberland County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 007 Franklin County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 009 Hancock County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 011 Kennebec County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 013 Knox County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 015 Lincoln County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 017 Oxford County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 019 Penobscot County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 021 Piscataquis County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0. 6930 0.3560 0.2080 023 Sagadahoc County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.7061 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 025 Somerset County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 027 Waldo County 0. 4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 029 Washington County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.3786 0.5845 0.8545 0.5448 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 031 York County 0.4334 0.6510 0.5390 0.3235 0.2420 0.1753 0.70 61 0.6868 0.5895 0.6930 0.3560 0.2080 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Androscoggin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 003 Aroostook County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 005 Cumberland County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 007 Franklin County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 4 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  009 Hancock County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 

### 23 **MAINE (cont’d)** 011 Kennebec County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 013 Knox County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 015 Lincoln County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 017 Oxford County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 019 Penobscot County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 021 Piscataquis County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 023 Sagadahoc County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 025 Somerset County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170. 1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 027 Waldo County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 029 Washington County 151.5 236.1 221.1 145.4 170.1 290.9 128.6 299.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 031 York County 151. 5 236.1 221.1 145.4 319.7 268.1 101.1 83.4 159.9 279.8 190.9 171.0 

### 24 

## MARYLAND **RVP, psi** 003 Anne Arundel County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 005 Baltimore County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9 .3 9.3 9.3 12.6 009 Calvert County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 011 Caroline County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 013 Carroll County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 015 Cecil County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 017 Charles County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 019 Dorchester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 021 Frederick County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6. 6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 023 Garrett County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 025 Harford County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 027 Howard County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 029 Kent County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 031 Montgomery County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 033 Prince George's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 035 Queen Anne's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 037 St. Mary's County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 039 Somerset County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 041 Talbot County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 0 43 Washington County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 045 Wicomico County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 047 Worcester County 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 8.2 8.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 510 Baltimore city 12.6 12.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 9.3 9.3 9.3 12.6 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Allegany County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 003 Anne Arundel County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.10 75 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 005 Baltimore County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 009 Calvert County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 0 11 Caroline County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 013 Carroll County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 015 Cecil County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 017 Charles County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 019 Dorchester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.107 5 2.1075 2.1075 021 Frederick County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 5 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  023 Garrett County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 

### 24 **MARYLAND (cont’d)** 025 Harford County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 027 Howard County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 029 Kent County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.107 5 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 031 Montgomery County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 033 Prince George's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1 075 2.1075 2.1075 035 Queen Anne's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 037 St. Mary's County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 039 Somerset Co unty 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 041 Talbot County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 043 Washington County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2. 1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 045 Wicomico County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 047 Worcester County 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2 .1075 510 Baltimore city 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Allegany County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 003 Anne Arundel County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0 005 Baltimore County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0 009 Calvert County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129 .0 159.0 199.6 230.0 011 Caroline County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 013 Carroll County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0 015 Cecil County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 12 9.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0 017 Charles County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0 019 Dorchester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 021 Frederick Co unty 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0 023 Garrett County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 025 Harford County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184 .0 211.0 027 Howard County 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0 029 Kent County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0 031 Montgomery County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 12 9.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0 033 Prince George's County 230.0 230.0 199.6 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 159.0 199.6 230.0 035 Queen Anne's County 174.0 174.0 155.1 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 130.0 155.1 174.0 037 St. Mary's Cou nty 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 039 Somerset County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 041 Talbot County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191. 9 207.9 043 Washington County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 045 Wicomico County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 047 Worcester County 207.9 207.9 191.9 191.9 170.5 17 0.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 170.5 191.9 207.9 510 Baltimore city 211.0 211.0 184.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 148.0 184.0 211.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 6 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **25** 

## MASSACHUSETTS **RVP, psi** 001 Barnstable County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 003 Berkshire County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 005 Bristol County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 007 Dukes County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 009 Ess ex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 011 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 013 Hampden County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 015 Hampshire County 13.5 13.5 13 .5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 017 Middlesex County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 019 Nantucket County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 021 Norfolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6 .7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 023 Plymouth County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 025 Suffolk County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 027 Worcester County 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Barnstable County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 003 Berkshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 005 Bristol County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 007 Dukes County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 009 Essex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 011 Franklin County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 013 Hampden County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 015 Hampshire County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 017 Middlesex County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 019 Nantucket County 1. 5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 021 Norfolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 023 Plymouth County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1 075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 025 Suffolk County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 027 Worcester County 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 1.5002 1.5002 1.5002 **Ga soline Sulfur, ppm**  001 Barnstable County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 003 Berkshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 005 Bristol County 279.0 2 79.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 007 Dukes County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 009 Essex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 011 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 013 Hampden County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 015 Hampshire County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 12 9.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 017 Middlesex County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 019 Nantucket County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 021 Norfolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 27 9.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 023 Plymouth County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 025 Suffolk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 027 Worceste r County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 7 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **33** 

## NEW HAMPSHIRE **RVP, psi** 001 Belknap County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6 003 Carroll County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6 005 Cheshire County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6 007 Coos County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6 009 Grafton County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 1 1.2 13.6 011 Hillsborough County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9 013 Merrimack County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9 015 Rockingham County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9 017 Strafford County 12.9 12.9 10.2 10.2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.2 10.2 12.9 019 Sullivan County 13.6 13.6 11.2 11.2 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.2 11.2 13.6 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Belknap County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2 858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 003 Carroll County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 005 Cheshire County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 0 07 Coos County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 009 Grafton County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 011 Hillsborough County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9 110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217 013 Merrimack County 1.8217 1.8217 1.9110 1.9110 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 2.0182 1.9110 1.9110 1.8217 015 Rockingham County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825 017 Strafford County 1.9825 1.9825 2.0539 2.0539 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.1432 2.0539 2.0539 1.9825 019 Sullivan County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2322 0.2322 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2858 0.2322 0.2322 0.1786 **Gasoline Sulfur, pp m**  001 Belknap County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 003 Carroll County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 005 Cheshire County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182. 5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 007 Coos County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 009 Grafton County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 011 Hillsborough County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 101.3 101.3 121.0 013 Merrimack County 121.0 121.0 101.3 101.3 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 101.3 101.3 121.0 015 Rockingham County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0 017 Strafford County 148.0 148.0 121.0 121.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 121.0 121.0 148.0 019 Sullivan County 228.1 228.1 208.6 208.6 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 182.5 208.6 208.6 228.1 

### 34 

## NEW JERSEY **RVP, psi** 001 Atlantic County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 003 Bergen County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 005 Burlington County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 007 Camden County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 009 Cape May County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 011 Cumberland County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 013 Essex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 1 0.1 12.5 015 Gloucester County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 017 Hudson County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 019 Hunterdon County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 021 Merce r County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 023 Middlesex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 8 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **34 NEW JERSEY**  025 Monmouth County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5



### (cont’d) 027 Morris C ounty 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 029 Ocean County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 031 Passaic County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 033 Salem County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 035 Somerset County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 037 Sussex County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 039 Union County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.1 10.1 12.5 041 Warren County 13.4 13.4 10.6 10.6 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 10.6 10.6 13.4 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Atlantic County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922 003 Bergen County 1.7172 1. 7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 005 Burlington County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 007 Camden County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2. 0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 009 Cape May County 1.6922 1.6922 1.8499 1.8499 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 2.0718 1.8499 1.8499 1.6922 011 Cumberland County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 013 Essex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 015 Gloucester County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 017 Hudson County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1 .8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 019 Hunterdon County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 021 Mercer County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1. 9457 1.8442 023 Middlesex County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 025 Monmouth County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 027 Morris County 1.7172 1 .7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 029 Ocean County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 031 Passaic County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 033 Salem County 1.8442 1.8442 1.9457 1.9457 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 2.0896 1.9457 1.9457 1.8442 035 Somerset County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 037 Sussex C ounty 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 039 Union County 1.7172 1.7172 1.7660 1.7660 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.8234 1.7660 1.7660 1.7172 041 Warren County 1.8753 1.8753 1.9110 1.9110 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9825 1.9110 1.9110 1.8753 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Atlantic County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0 003 Bergen County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 005 Burlington County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 007 Camden County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 009 Cape May County 207.0 207.0 174.0 174.0 130.0 1 30.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 174.0 174.0 207.0 011 Cumberland County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 013 Essex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 015 Gloucester County 1 74.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 017 Hudson County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 019 Hunterdon County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 14 1.0 021 Mercer County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0 023 Middlesex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 025 Monmouth County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114. 0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 027 Morris County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 029 Ocean County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 031 Passaic County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 9 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **34 NEW JERSEY**  033 Salem County 174.0 174.0 155.1 155.1 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 155.1 155.1 174.0



### (cont’d) 035 Somerset County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 037 Sussex County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 039 Union County 141.0 141.0 129.4 129.4 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 114.0 129.4 129.4 141.0 041 Warren County 125.0 125.0 123.7 123.7 122.0 122.0 122.0 12 2.0 122.0 123.7 123.7 125.0 

### 36 

## NEW YORK **RVP, psi** 001 Albany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 003 Allegany County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 005 Bronx County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 007 Broome County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 009 Cattaraugus County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 011 Cayuga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8. 3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 013 Chautauqua County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 015 Chemung County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 017 Chenango County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 019 Clinton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 021 Columbia County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 023 Cortland County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 025 Delaware County 12. 7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 027 Dutchess County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 029 Erie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 031 Essex County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 033 Franklin County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 035 Fulton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 037 Genesee County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 039 Greene County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 041 Hamilton County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 043 Herkimer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 045 Jefferson County 12.7 12.7 12 .6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 047 Kings County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 049 Lewis County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 051 Livingston County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9 .6 10.7 11.4 053 Madison County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 055 Monroe County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 057 Montgomery County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 059 Nassau County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 061 New York County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 063 Niagara County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 065 Oneida County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 067 Onondaga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 069 Ontario County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 071 Orange County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 073 Orleans County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 075 Oswego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 077 Otsego County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 079 Putnam County 12. 8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 081 Queens County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 10 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **36 NEW YORK**  083 Rensselaer County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4



### (cont’d) 085 Richmond County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 087 Rockland County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 089 St. Lawrence County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 091 Saratoga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 093 Schenectady County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 095 Schoharie County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 097 Schuyler County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11. 4 099 Seneca County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 101 Steuben County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 103 Suffolk County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 105 Sullivan County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 107 Tioga County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 109 Tompkins County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 111 Ulster County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8. 2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 113 Warren County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 115 Washington County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 117 Wayne County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 119 Westchester County 12.8 12.6 12.1 9.0 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.9 10.3 11.7 12.5 121 Wyoming County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 123 Yates County 12.7 12.7 12.6 10.9 8.6 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 9.6 10.7 11.4 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Albany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 003 Allegany County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 005 Bronx County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 007 Broome County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 009 Cattaraugus County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.655 1 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965 011 Cayuga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 013 Chautauqua County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965 015 Chemung Coun ty 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 017 Chenango County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 019 Clinton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 021 Columbia County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 023 Cortland County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.893 0 025 Delaware County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 027 Dutchess County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 029 Erie County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965 031 Essex County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 033 Franklin County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6 965 0.9466 0.8930 035 Fulton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 037 Genesee County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 039 Greene County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 041 Hamilton County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 043 Herkimer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 045 Jefferson County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 047 Kings County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 049 L ewis County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 051 Livingston County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 053 Madison County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0 .8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 11 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **36 NEW YORK**  055 Monroe County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930



### (cont’d) 057 Montgomery County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.94 66 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 059 Nassau County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 061 New York County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 063 Niagar

a County 0.8965 1.0344 0.8275 0.6551 0.8965 0.5862 0.8275 0.9654 0.6551 0.6896 0.9310 0.8965 065 Oneida County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 067 Onondaga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 069 Ontario County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 071 Orange County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 073 Orleans County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 075 Oswego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 077 Otsego County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 079 Putnam County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 081 Queens County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8 217 1.8574 1.6431 083 Rensselaer County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 085 Richmond County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 087 Rockland County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 089 St. Lawrence County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 091 Saratoga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0. 5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 093 Schenectady County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 095 Schoharie County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.946 6 0.8930 097 Schuyler County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 099 Seneca County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 101 Steuben County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 103 Suffolk County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 105 Sullivan County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 107 Tioga County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 109 Tompkins County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 111 Ulster Cou nty 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 113 Warren County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 115 Washington County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5 894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 117 Wayne County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 119 Westchester County 1.8932 1.9467 1.8932 1.8753 1.9646 1.9467 1.9646 1.8217 1.9646 1.8217 1.8574 1.6431 121 Wyoming County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 123 Yates County 0.8751 1.0180 0.8216 0.6430 0.8930 0.5894 0.8216 0.9466 0.6787 0.6965 0.9466 0.8930 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 00 1 Albany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 003 Allegany County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 005 Bronx County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 007 Broome County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 009 Cattaraugus County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 011 Cayuga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 3 10.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 013 Chautauqua County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 015 Chemung County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 017 Chenango Co unty 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 019 Clinton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 021 Columbia County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 25 0.0 210.0 023 Cortland County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 025 Delaware County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 12 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **36 NEW YORK**  027 Dutchess County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0



### (cont’d) 029 Erie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 031 Essex County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 033 Franklin County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 035 Fulton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 037 Genesee County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 25 0.0 210.0 039 Greene County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 041 Hamilton County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 043 Herkimer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 045 Jefferson County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 047 Kings County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 049 Lewis County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 051 Livingston County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 053 Madison County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 0 55 Monroe County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 057 Montgomery County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 059 Nassau County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 1 90.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 061 New York County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 063 Niagara County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 065 Oneida County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 067 Onondaga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 069 Ontario County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 071 Orange Coun ty 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 073 Orleans County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 075 Oswego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 077 Otsego County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 079 Putnam County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 081 Queens County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 1 90.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 083 Rensselaer County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 085 Richmond County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 087 Rockland County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 089 St. Lawrence County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 091 Saratoga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 093 Schenectady County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 095 Schoharie County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 097 Schuyler County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 099 Seneca County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 101 Steuben County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 103 Suffolk County 210.0 220.0 180. 0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 105 Sullivan County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 107 Tioga County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 109 Tompki ns County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 111 Ulster County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 113 Warren County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 115 Washington County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 117 Wayne County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 119 Westchester County 210.0 220.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 210.0 220.0 190.0 190.0 220.0 200.0 240.0 121 Wyoming County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0 123 Yates County 260.0 250.0 250.0 230.0 310.0 320.0 340.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 250.0 210.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 13 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **42** 

## PENNSYLVANIA **RVP, psi** 001 Adams County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 003 Allegheny County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 005 Armstrong County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 007 Beaver County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 009 Bedford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 011 Berks County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 013 Blair County 13 .5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 015 Bradford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 017 Bucks County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5 019 Butler County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7 .8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 021 Cambria County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 023 Cameron County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 025 Carbon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 027 Centre County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 029 Chester County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5 031 Clarion County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 033 Clearfield County 1 3.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 035 Clinton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 037 Columbia County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 039 Crawford County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 041 Cumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 043 Dauphin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 045 Delaware County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5 047 Elk County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 049 Erie County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 051 Fayette County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 053 Forest County 1 3.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 055 Franklin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 057 Fulton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 059 Greene County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 061 Huntingdon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 063 Indiana County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 065 Jefferson County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11 .0 13.5 067 Juniata County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 069 Lackawanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 071 Lancaster County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 073 Lawre nce County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 075 Lebanon County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 077 Lehigh County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 079 Luzerne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 081 Lycoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 083 McKean County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 085 Mercer County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 1 1.0 11.0 13.5 087 Mifflin County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 089 Monroe County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 091 Montgomery County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5 093 Mo ntour County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 14 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **42 PENNSYLVANIA**  095 Northampton County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5



### (cont’d) 097 Northumberland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 099 Perry County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 101 Philadelphia County 13.5 13.5 10.6 10.6 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 10.6 10.6 13.5 103 Pike County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 105 Potter County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 107 Schuylkill County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 109 Snyder County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 111 Somerset County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 113 Sullivan County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 115 Susquehanna County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 117 Tioga County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 119 Union County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 121 Venango County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 123 Warren County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 125 Washington Coun ty 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 127 Wayne County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 129 Westmoreland County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 11.0 11.0 13.5 131 Wyoming County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 133 York County 13.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 11.0 11.0 13.5 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Adams County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 0 03 Allegheny County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 005 Armstrong County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 007 Beaver County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0. 2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 009 Bedford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 011 Berks County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 013 Blair County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 015 Bradford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 017 Bucks County 2.5303 2.5 303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 019 Butler County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 021 Cambria County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 023 Cameron County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 025 Carbon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 027 Centre Co unty 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 029 Chester County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 031 Clarion County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.26 79 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 033 Clearfield County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 035 Clinton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1 965 037 Columbia County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 039 Crawford County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 041 Cumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 043 Dauphin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 045 Delaware County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 047 Elk County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 049 Erie County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 051 Fayette County 0 .1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 053 Forest County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 055 Franklin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2 679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 15 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **42 PENNSYLVANIA**  057 Fulton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965



### (cont’d) 059 Greene County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 061 Huntingdon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 063 Indiana County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 065 Jefferson County 0. 1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 067 Juniata County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 069 Lackawanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0 .2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 071 Lancaster County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 073 Lawrence County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 075 Lebanon County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 077 Lehigh County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 079 Luzerne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0. 2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 081 Lycoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 083 McKean County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.23 22 0.2322 0.1965 085 Mercer County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 087 Mifflin County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 089 Monroe County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 091 Montgomery County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 093 Montour County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 095 Northampton County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 097 Northumberland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.19 65 099 Perry County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 101 Philadelphia County 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.1075 2.5303 2.5303 2.5303 103 Pike County 0.1965 0.1965 0.232 2 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 105 Potter County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 107 Schuylkill County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.267 9 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 109 Snyder County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 111 Somerset County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 113 Sullivan County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 115 Susquehanna County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 117 Tioga County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.267 9 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 119 Union County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 121 Venango County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 123 Warren County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 125 Washington County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 127 Wayne County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2 322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 129 Westmoreland County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 131 Wyoming County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 133 York County 0.1965 0.1965 0.2322 0.2322 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2322 0.2322 0.1965 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Adams County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 003 Allegheny County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 005 Armstrong County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 007 Beaver County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 009 Bedford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 011 Berks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 013 Blair County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 015 Bradford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 017 Bucks County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 16 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **42 PENNSYLVANIA**  019 Butler County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0



### (cont’d) 021 Cambria County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 023 Cameron County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 025 Carbon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 027 Centre County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 029 Chester County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 031 Clarion County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 033 Clearfield County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 035 Clinton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 037 Columbia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 039 Crawford County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 041 Cumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 043 Dauphin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 045 Delaware County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 047 Elk County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 049 Erie County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 051 Fayette County 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 053 Forest County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 055 Franklin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 057 Fulton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 059 Greene County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 061 Huntingdon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279 .0 279.0 279.0 279.0 063 Indiana County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 065 Jefferson County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 067 Juniata County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 069 Lackawanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 071 Lancaster County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 073 Lawrence County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 075 Lebanon County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 077 Lehigh County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 079 Luzerne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 081 Lycoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 083 McKean County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 085 Mercer County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 087 Mifflin County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 089 Monroe County 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 091 Montgomery County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 093 Montour County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 095 Northampton County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 097 Northumberland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 099 Perry County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 101 Philadelphia County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 129.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 103 Pike County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 105 Potter County 279.0 279.0 2 79.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 107 Schuylkill County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 109 Snyder County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 111 Somerset County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 113 Sullivan County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 115 Susquehanna County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 17 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **42 PENNSYLVANIA**  117 Tioga County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0



### (cont’d) 119 Union County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 121 Venango County 279 .0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 123 Warren County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 125 Washington County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279 .0 127 Wayne County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 129 Westmoreland County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 131 Wyoming County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279. 0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 133 York County 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 279.0 

### 44 

## RHODE ISLAND **RVP, psi** 001 Bristol County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5 003 Kent County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5 005 Newport County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5 007 Providence County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5 009 Washington County 12.5 12.5 10.1 10.1 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 10.1 10.1 12.5 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Bristol County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110 003 Kent County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6 745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110 005 Newport County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110 007 Providence County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1. 7110 009 Washington County 1.7110 1.7110 1.6801 1.6801 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6745 1.6801 1.6801 1.7110 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Bristol County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0 003 Kent County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0 005 Newport County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0 007 Providence County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166 .4 166.4 193.0 009 Washington County 193.0 193.0 166.4 166.4 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 131.0 166.4 166.4 193.0

## Table C **- 1 (continued)** 

C - 18 **FIPS_State State**  **FIPS_County County**  **JAN FEB**  **MAR APR**  **MAY JUN**  **JUL AUG**  **SEP OCT**  **NOV DEC**  **50** 

## VERMONT **RVP, psi** 001 Addison County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 003 Bennington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 005 Caledonia County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 007 Chittenden County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 009 Essex County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9 .5 9.5 011 Franklin County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 013 Grand Isle County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 015 Lamoille County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 017 Orange County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9 .5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 019 Orleans County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 021 Rutland County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 023 Washington County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 025 W indham County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 027 Windsor County 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 **Oxygen Weight Percent** 001 Addison County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0 .2143 0.2143 0.1786 003 Bennington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 005 Caledonia County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 007 Chittenden C ounty 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 009 Essex County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 011 Franklin County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.26 79 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 013 Grand Isle County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 015 Lamoille County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0. 1786 017 Orange County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 019 Orleans County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 021 Rutland County 0.1786 0.1786 0.21 43 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 023 Washington County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 025 Windham County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2 679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 027 Windsor County 0.1786 0.1786 0.2143 0.2143 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2679 0.2143 0.2143 0.1786 **Gasoline Sulfur, ppm** 001 Addison County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 003 Bennington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 005 Caledonia County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 007 Chittenden County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 18 3.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 009 Essex County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 011 Franklin County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 013 Grand Isle County 209. 3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 015 Lamoille County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 017 Orange County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 019 Orleans County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 021 Rutland County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 023 Washington County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 1 83.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 025 Windham County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3 027 Windsor County 209.3 209.3 209.3 209.3 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 183.1 209.3 209.3 209.3