alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         563,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,168,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,514
<INVENTORY>                                 86,755,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           101,372,582
<PP&E>                                      47,891,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             169,426,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       65,268,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,457
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,937,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               169,426,943
<SALES>                                    148,723,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           155,646,607
<CGS>                                      104,758,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              148,767,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,809,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,020,951
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,950,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,560,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,390,308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1450

JOHN S. ZIMMERMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL BRUBAKER; NANCY BRUBAKER; LYNN D.

BRUBAKER; STEVEN BLATT; PORTER GRAVES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-95-39-H)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Zimmerman, Appellant Pro Se. William Augustas Julias,

JULIAS, BLATT & BLATT, P.C., Harrisonburg, Virginia; Peter Robert

Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We grant Appellees' motions to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by

Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264

(1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229

(1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to

file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or

final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the

appeal period are when the district court extends the time to

appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

Appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain either an extension or a reopening of the appeal period

leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of

Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 04-0141 

ENGINEER: Hall / AMO 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

General Eqp.: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): 

CRSS (12/08/2003): 

Chemical Category: 

VP: <1E-06 torr @25EC 

S-H2O: Dispersible 

MW: 422.6 

Phys State: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (12/09/2003): 

Related cases: None Listed 

Ground Water: Slow to Moderate 

Health: 2; Dermal and Inhalation, XB Testing not 

required 

Eco: 2; All releases to water, XB Testing desired 

PBT: P1B1T1 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3 

ASSUMPTIONS: 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr: 

Process Description: 
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 04-0141 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

 Tot. # of workers: 

 Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

Basis: 

Dermal: 

Basis:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6421

SHAWN HUNTER, a/k/a Elijah Rybinni,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. L. BASS, Warden; UNKNOWN CHAPLIN, Captain;

SERGEANT HARRISON; JOHN DOE, Correctional

Officer #1; JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer #2,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-871)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 18, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's judgment, pursuant to

a jury verdict, that he recover nothing in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) action. The record does not contain a transcript of the

trial. Appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the

issues raised on appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); 4th Cir. Local

R. 10(c). Appellants proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis are

entitled to transcripts at government expense only in certain

circumstances. 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). By failing to produce a

transcript or to qualify for the production of a transcript at

government expense, Appellant has waived review of the issues on

appeal which depend upon the transcript to show error. Powell v.

Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1025

(1992); Keller v. Prince George's Co., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th

Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the record before the court and find

no reversible error. We therefore affirm the district court's order

entering judgment for the Appellees. We deny Appellant's motion to

appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is made as of this 1st day
of April, 2002, by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana
corporation (the "Company"), and William E. Rowe (the "Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the
Employee dated as of November 1, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to eliminate certain
benefits payable to Employee upon termination of employment in consideration of
the inclusion of Employee as an initial participant in a Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the "SERP").

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of
Employee by the Company, the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company and the benefits potentially payable to Employee under
the SERP, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of April 1, 2002:

         SECTION 1. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the terms and
provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         SECTION 2. Article IV, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.

         SECTION 3. Article IV, Section 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
renumbered as Article IV, Section 5.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

                                 STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.


                                 By:
                                    -------------------------------------
                                     James W. McFarland
                                     Compensation Committee Chairman

                                 EMPLOYEE:


                                 ----------------------------------------
                                             William E. Rowe
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:          (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company    for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2005 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Michael E. Tennenbaum           Michael E. Tennenbaum *Chairman of the Executive Committee*Dated: November 10, 2005     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely toaccompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Xiaoan He and Xiuyong Zhang, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.




December 2, 2011





/s/ Xiaoan
HeXiaoan He

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Xiuyong
ZhangXiuyong Zhang

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 1O-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Taylor, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/Greg S. Taylor Greg Taylor Chief Financial Officer  May 19, 2008
# EUR-Lex - 32004D0240 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32004D0240

**2004/240/EC: Council Decision of 8 March 2004 amending Decision 2003/479/EC concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council **

*
Official Journal L 074 , 12/03/2004 P. 0017 - 0018 *

Council Decision

of 8 March 2004

amending Decision 2003/479/EC concerning the rules applicable to national experts and military staff on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council

(2004/240/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 207(2) thereof,

Having regard to Decision 2003/479/EC,

Whereas:

(1) Article 15(7) of Decision 2003/479/EC provides that the daily and monthly allowances shall be adjusted each year without retroactive effect on the basis of the adaptation of the basic salaries of Community officials in Brussels and Luxembourg.

(2) The Council, through Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2148/03 of 5 December 2003 correcting with effect from 1 July 2002 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities(1) and (EC, Euratom) No 2182/03 of 8 December 2003 adjusting with effect from 1 January 2004 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the weightings applied thereto(2), has adopted an adjustment of 3,4 % and 1 % respectively of the remuneration and pensions of Community officials,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Article 15 of Decision 2003/479/EC is hereby amended as follows:

1. paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:

"1. A SNE shall be entitled to a daily subsistence allowance throughout the period of secondment. Where the distance between the place of residence and the place of secondment is 150 km or less, the daily allowance shall be EUR 27,96. Where the distance is more than 150 km, the daily allowance shall be EUR 111,83.";

2. paragraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:

"2. If the SNE has not received removal expenses from either the GSC or from the employer, an additional monthly allowance shall be paid as shown in the table below:

>TABLE>

This allowance shall be paid monthly in arrears.";

3. paragraph 4 shall be replaced by the following:

"4. SNEs who during the three years ending six months before the secondment habitually resided or pursued their principal professional activity at a location situated at a distance of 150 km or less from the place of secondment shall receive a daily subsistence allowance of EUR 27,96. For the purpose of this provision, circumstances arising from work done by SNEs for a State other than that of the place of secondment or for an international organisation shall not be taken into account."

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the first day of the month following its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2004.

For the Council

The President

D. Ahern

(1) OJ L 323, 10.12.2003, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 327, 16.12.2003, p. 3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6221

ENGRAM M. BELLAMY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL M. CLATTERBUCK, Magistrate,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-1133)

Submitted: November 17, 2003 Decided: May 26, 2004

Before LUTTIG and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Engram M. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Engram M. Bellamy appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Bellamy v. Clatterbuck, No. CA-02-1133 (W.D. Va. Nov.

12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

NOVEMBER 8, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-11762

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-03375-WCO

CALLIE SMITH, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SAXON MORTGAGE, 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Georgia

 ________________________

(November 8, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES, and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Callie Smith appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor

of Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 

Smith argues the district court erred by (1) finding the Security Deed granted

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) the power of sale and the

authority to assign the security deed, and (2) concluding the notice of foreclosure

sent to Smith by Saxon complied with the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 

44-14-162.2. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs in this case

and find no merit to any of Smith’s issues on appeal. We affirm for the reasons set

forth in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated February 9,

2011, and the district court’s order dated March 16, 2011. 

AFFIRMED. 

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29727-29728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12667]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME:  Monday, June 6, 2011, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and Tuesday, 
June 7, 2011, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

PLACE: Westin Washington, DC City Center Hotel, 1400 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005, Phone number (202) 429-1700.

PURPOSE: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of 
Advisors

[[Page 29728]]

will meet to receive updates on EAC's program activities and budget. 
The Board will receive updates on the Voting System Testing and 
Certification program. The Board will hear updates from a special 
committee on Defining Issues of Voting System Sustainability. The Board 
will hear presentations by the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology (NIST) and the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) on 
UOCAVA Internet voting and common data format. The Board will receive 
updates on EAC grants programs including: The Accessible Voting 
Technology Initiative; and the Pre-Election Logic and Accuracy Testing 
and Post-Election Audit Initiative. The Board will receive updates on 
EAC research and studies. The Board will hear a presentation on a 
Rutgers report on Voter Participation of People with Disabilities in 
2010. The Board will hear other committee reports, elect officers and 
consider motions. The Board will consider other administrative matters.
    Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the EAC's Communications 
Office.
    This meeting will be open for public observation.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-12667 Filed 5-19-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 8133

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM101AD

737

- 32

- 1448

--- 5/19/2011

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008