alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

August 15, 2014

149921 (26)

WESLEY BASKIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 149921

COA: 320493

MUSKEGON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

WARDEN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion to waive fees is DENIED because 

MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. 

Ordinarily, MCL 600.2963(8) would preclude plaintiff from seeking leave to appeal in 

this Court because of an inability to provide the initial partial fee. However, applying 

that statutory section to bar plaintiff from initiating an application for leave to appeal 

from the original complaint for habeas corpus filed in the court of appeals would violate 

the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Smith v Bennett, 365 US 

708; 81 S Ct 895; 6 L Ed 2d 39 (1961). 

The Clerk shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff. Plaintiff has 21 days 

from the certification of this order to submit one of those copies to this Court. By doing 

that, plaintiff becomes responsible for paying the $375 filing fee. MCL 600.2963. 

Failure to timely submit the order will result in the appeal not being docketed in this 

Court. The Clerk shall retain plaintiff’s pleadings until he timely submits the order or the 

21-day period for doing so has expired.

Plaintiff is not required to pay an initial partial fee at the time he submits the order 

to this Court. The Department of Corrections is directed to collect amounts equal to 50 

percent of the deposits made to plaintiff’s account each month and remit $375 to this 

Court when that full amount is collected. Plaintiff may not file further appeals in this 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 15, 2014

jam

2

Clerk

Court from civil cases initiated by him until the entry fee in this appeal is paid in full. 

MCL 600.2963(8).
~-~-S r-ing ®ar- 

~~

,- -

1 June 1, 2015 

TO: Honorable John Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street, NW 

Wasbington, D.C. 20520 

DOS-2015-0016 

CC: Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

DOT-OST-2015-0082 

Honorable Penny S. Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20230 

DOC-2015-0001 

Dear Mr. Kerry: 

Recent coverage of the battle between the tbree major U.S. airlines and the three major Middle 

Easten airlines has raised concerns within the travel and tourism industry. Springboard Vacations is 

Los Angeles's fastest growing travel company to Auatralia and the South Pacific, and we are proud to 

have been named the official tour operator to the Australian Open in Melbourne. Our business to 

Dubai and Qatar is also increasing. 

The Middle Eastern airlines have expanded service to points in Australasia and the Middle East. They 

have brought helpful competition to Qantus, Virgin Australia, and other airlines offering significant 

U.S.-Australia and -New Zealand flights. There are several advantages of having the Middle Eastern 

airlines in this market: 

• Fares. The more carriers vying for a slice of the U.S. traveler's dollar, the more value-based 

offerings are introduced. The Middle Eastern airlines are not always the lowest cost option, 

but their presence exerts downward preasure as other carriers strive to undercut them on 

price. 

Amenities. With several carders within a$500 range in fares, amenities can be an important 

consideration, especially on flights that exceed 12 hours. Etihad has recendy introduced its 

Residence and First Class Apartment acconunodations on some flights from Abu Dhabi to 

Australia, which can be attractive to a certain class of traveler. Bars and social areas, which 

Spdngboard Vacations, Inc. I Reservations: 866.447.7746 1 E: infoQspnngboardvacations.com I W: www.springboardvacations.com 
make flights part of the tourism experience rather than dead tirne, are also becoming popular 

additions, with Emirates and Qatar bringing such products to market. 

Service quality. The U.S. airlines are not known for service. Although one can have an 

excellent eaperience, there is signiflcant variation from flight crew to flight crew. Somehow 

the U.S. airlines need to be prodded toward excellence. The increase in competition for key 

routes, including lucrative U.S. to Australia travel, can help spur them to make the changes 

travelers are demanding. 

Inhibiting the expansion of the Middle Eastern airlines would be a disservice to travelers and to the 

travel industry. I encourage your agencies to take a conservative approach in addressing Open Skies 

agreements. 

Sinc y, 

Warren Grau 

Executive Vice President 

Springboard Vacations
2 

VineLIN,,:;2„; t,I EMS1 

was committed by discharging a firearm. We therefore conclude that the 

district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Richard Wagner, District Judge 

William 0. Gibbons 

Lander County District Attorney 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Lander County Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A
# L_2004171DE.01000301.xml

| 5.5.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 171/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 171/3

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2002/63/EG der Kommission vom 11. Juli 2002 zur Festlegung gemeinschaftlicher Probenahmemethoden zur amtlichen Kontrolle von Pestizidrückständen in und auf Erzeugnissen pflanzlichen und tierischen Ursprungs und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 79/700/EWG (1)

(1

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 187 vom 16. Juli 2002
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 187 vom 16. Juli 2002

Seite 42, Fußnote 12:

statt:

„Bei Kernobst ...“

muss es heißen:

„Bei Steinobst ...“.

---
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of AgriSolar Solutions, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Arnold Tinter,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Arnold TinterArnold Tinter, Chief Financial Officer July 14, 2010
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1938 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1938

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1938/2002 of 30 October 2002 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals **

*
Official Journal L 297 , 31/10/2002 P. 0006 - 0006 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1938/2002

of 30 October 2002

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 determining the intervention centres for cereals

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1666/2000(2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The intervention centres are determined in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1792/2001(4). Some Member States have requested changes to some of these centres.

(2) Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 should accordingly be amended.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 207, 18.8.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 243, 13.9.2001, p. 25.

ANNEX

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2273/93 is amended as follows:

1. In the BUNDESREPUBLIK DEUTSCHLAND-Brandenburg section, the "Fürstenwalde-Finow" centre is named "Fürstenwalde".

2. In the UNITED KINGDOM section, the "Locharbriggs" centre is replaced by "Henstridge".
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1923

NORMAN GATEWOOD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JACKIE JEFFRIES, Director of Human Resources, Carolina Panthers; PORSCHA PENN, Human Resources Assistant, Carolina Panthers; JERRY RICHARDSON, Owner, Carolina Panthers; BONNIE CREIGHTON, Human Resources Assistant, Carolina Panthers , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charl otte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 00021

- MOC

- DCK )

Submitted : December 18, 2018 Decided: December 20, 2018

Before AGEE, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Norman Gatewood, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Evans Johnson, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Norman Gatewood seeks to appeal the distric t court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint alleging that Gatewood was terminated from his employment because of his race and color, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018)

. The district court dismissed Gatewood’s action without prejudice and without the opportunity to amend the complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because it is possible that Gatewood could amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court , the court’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 25, 628

- 30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Gatewood
to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

w ould not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 5, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00091

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

,

Appellant

v.

Hector R. RAMIREZ

, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Web b County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVT002640

- D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing is

hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to September 24, 2018.

_________________________________ Irene Rio s , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of September, 2 018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QA10 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust
   Company Americas.
Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
# EUR-Lex - 32002E0022 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002E0022

**Council Common Position of 11 January 2002 concerning a prohibition on imports of rough diamonds from Sierra Leone **

*
Official Journal L 010 , 12/01/2002 P. 0081 - 0081 *

Council Common Position

of 11 January 2002

concerning a prohibition on imports of rough diamonds from Sierra Leone

(2002/22/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) On 5 July 2000 the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1306(2000) prohibiting the direct or indirect import of all rough diamonds from Sierra Leone for an initial period of 18 months, while exempting imports of rough diamonds whose origin is certified by the Government of Sierra Leone.

(2) On 2 July 2000 the Council adopted Common Position 2000/455/CFSP(1) so as to implement Resolution 1306(2000). That Common Position expired on 5 January 2002.

(3) On 19 December 2001 the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1385(2001) whereby the measures imposed by Resolution 1306(2000) are to remain in force until 5 December 2002. A new Common Position must therefore be adopted.

(4) Action by the Community is needed in order to implement the required measures,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

The direct or indirect import of all rough diamonds from Sierra Leone to the Community shall be prohibited under the conditions set out in UNSCR 1306(2000) and 1385(2001).

Article 2

Rough diamonds controlled by the Government of Sierra Leone through the Certificate of Origin regime consistent with paragraph 5 of Resolution 1306(2000) shall continue to be exempt from the measure referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Common Position shall be reviewed as the need arises.

Article 4

This Common Position shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

It shall be applicable from 5 January 2002.

It shall expire on 5 December 2002.

Article 5

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 11 January 2002.

For the Council

The President

J. Piqué I Camps

(1) OJ L 183, 22.7.2000, p. 2.
#### Andrew Kwasi DONKOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55889

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed May 31, 2017

Andrew Kwasi Donkor, Pro Se

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Andrew Kwasi Donkor appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and due process violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); *Dominguez v. Miller,*51 F.3d 1502, 1508 n.5 (9th Cir. 1995) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8). We affirm.

In his opening brief, Donkor failed to challenge any of the district court’s grounds for dismissal of the operative complaint, and therefore Donkor waived any such challenge. *See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington,*350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); *Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[Arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

Even if Donkor had not waived this challenge, the district court properly dismissed Donkor’s action because the allegations in his third amended complaint were prolix, difficult to decipher, and failed to indicate how the named defendants violated Donkor’s constitutional rights. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (stating that complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief’); *McHenry v. Renne,*84 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 1996) (Rule 8 is an independent ground for dismissal and requires each averment of a pleading to be simple, concise, arid direct in stating which defendant is liable to the plaintiff for which wrong).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00344

- CV

J ESSICA C HANDLER AND S CULPT P OD

, I NC

. , Appellants

V

.

KMCC E NTERPRISES

, LLC ; K ENNETH

W ALL ; AND M ARIA W

ALL

, Appellees §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 462nd District Court

of Denton County ( 17

- 10144

- 393 )

October 14 , 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

trial court committed revers i ble error. W e reverse the por ti ons of the trial court ’ s

January 25, 2019, August 21, 2019, and November 27 , 2019 orders that disallow ed any

discovery by appellant s Jessica Chandler and Sculpt Pod, Inc. ; wa ived all objection s to

appellees KMCC Enterprises

, LLC , Kenneth Wall, and Maria Wall ’ s discovery ; and

refused to allow Chandler and Scu lpt Pod to support their defenses or oppose the

clai ms against them. We affirm t he r emainder of thes e orders

. We reverse theJu ne 19, 202 0 order and the July 31, 2020 d a m ages judgment. We r emand the case for

further proceedings.

It is further ordered that appell ees KMCC Enterprises, LLC, Kenneth Wall,

and Maria Wall, shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s / D a bney B a ssel Justice Dabney Bassel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0368 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES WILLIAM POST,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 27, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 14 2024

05/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0368
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 71
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 30, 2015

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                              May 6, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Sister Ann 
                          Keefe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SISTER ANN KEEFE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sister Ann Keefe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sister Ann 
Keefe Post Office''.
                                                        Calendar No. 71

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Sister Ann 
                          Keefe Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 6, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```