alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 24 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 24

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the free exercise of religion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

 Mr. Cochran introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
               relative to the free exercise of religion.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``The right of citizens of the United States to the free exercise 
of religion shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by 
any State.''.
                                 <all>
```
II

Calendar No. 337

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 981

[Report No. 104–235]

Entitled the ‘‘Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership Act’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Mr. EXON (for himself and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

FEBRUARY 20 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 7), 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER without amendment

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Truck Safety and Congressional Partnership

Act’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Truck Safety

5 and Congressional Partnership Act of 1995’’.
2

S 981 RS

1 SEC. 2. SINGLE TRAILER LENGTH.

2 Any Federal regulatory standard for single trailer

3 length issued pursuant to negotiations and procedures au4 thorized under the North American Free Trade Agree5 ment, shall not exceed fifty-three feet.

Calendar No. 337

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 981

[Report No. 104–235]

A BILL

Entitled the ‘‘Truck Safety and Congressional

Partnership Act’’.

FEBRUARY 20 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 7), 1996

Reported without amendment
Helen Arlene Owen, Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lily Mines, Deceased; s 

# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00561

- CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, L.L.C. d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Appell ant

v.

Helen Arlene OWEN , Individually and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Lily Mines, Deceased; Helen Bomar, as Wrongful Death Beneficiary and on Behalf of the Estate of Frank Bomar, Deceased; Trinidad Virginia Luna Rangel and Ted Ric hard Luna,, Appellee s

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 13633 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal. Appellees’ brief is curr ently due November 16, 2015. On October 30, 2015, appellees filed an unopposed motion for extension of time, asking this court to extend the due date for appellees’ brief to January 5, 2016. In support of their request, appellees assert that the parties are scheduled for mediation on December 15, 2015. The parties hope to settle the underlying dispute through the mediation process. After reviewing appellees’ motion, we GRANT appellees’ motion for an extension of time and ORDER appellee’s to file

their b rief on or before January 5, 2016. If the parties are able to settle the underlying dispute at mediation, we ORDER appellant and appellees to notify this court in writing of the settlement as soon as possible.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of November, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NO. 07-04-0288-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	SEPTEMBER 20, 2004

	______________________________

	FORTY ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS

	($41,630.00), APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 91,479-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pending before this Court is claimant Gilberto Lamas’s1 motion by which he requests that his notice of appeal be withdrawn.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  By the certificate of conference he indicates that he and the State have agreed to dismiss this appeal.  

	Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee,

v.

BROCK AMELIA HILL, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0548 

Appeal from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR202000854 

The Honorable Billy K. Sipe, Jr., Judge Pro Tempore

AFFIRMED

COUNSEL

Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Tucson

By Karen Moody

Counsel for Appellee

Jill L. Evans, Attorney at Law, Flagstaff

By Jill L. Evans

Counsel for Appellant

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge D. Steven Williams delivered the decision of the court, in which 

Presiding Judge Cynthia J. Bailey and Judge Peter B. Swann joined.

FILED 8-16-2022
STATE v. HILL

Decision of the Court

2

W I L L I A M S, Judge:

¶1 Brock Amelia Hill was convicted of two counts of negligent 

homicide, two counts of aggravated assault, one count of failure to stop at 

the scene of an accident involving death or serious physical injury, and two 

counts of driving under the influence. The superior court sentenced Hill to 

40.25 years’ imprisonment and, after a contested restitution hearing, 

ordered him to pay restitution of $33,799.12. Hill appeals solely from the 

court’s restitution order. 

¶2 Hill’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967) and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297 (1969) advising us there are no 

meritorious grounds for reversal. Hill was granted an opportunity to file a 

supplemental brief in propria persona but did not do so. Our obligation is to 

review the entire record for reversible error. State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 537, 

¶ 30 (App. 1999). 

¶3 We have reviewed the entire record for reversible error with 

respect to the restitution order and find none. The superior court ordered 

Hill to pay restitution totaling $33,799.12, which included reimbursement 

for: (1) the cost of two funerals; (2) travel costs for victims’ representatives

to attend court; (3) lost wages for a surviving victim; (4) and medical bills.

Record evidence supports the court’s order. We, therefore, affirm the 

restitution order.

¶4 Defense counsel’s obligations pertaining to Hill’s 

representation in this appeal have ended. Defense counsel need do no more 

than inform Hill of the outcome of this appeal and his future options, 

unless, upon review, counsel finds an issue appropriate for submission to 

the Arizona Supreme Court by petition for review. See State v. Shattuck, 140 

Ariz. 582, 584–85 (1984). On this court’s motion, Hill has 30 days from the 

date of this decision to proceed, if he wishes, with an in propria persona

motion for reconsideration or petition for review.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 27 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Clerk of the House of Representatives is directed to correct 
the enrollment of H.R. 402 as follows:
    Amend section 109 to read:

``SEC. 109. CONFIRMATION OF WOODY ISLAND AS ELIGIBLE NATIVE VILLAGE.

    ``The Native Village of Woody, Island located on Woody Island, 
Alaska, in the Koniag Region, is hereby confirmed as an eligible Alaska 
Native Village, pursuant to section 11(b)(3) of the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act (``ANCSA''). It is further confirmed that 
Leisnoi, Inc., is the Village Corporation, as that term is defined in 
section 3(j) of ANCSA, for the village of Woody Island. This section 
shall become effective on October 1, 1998, unless the United States 
judicial system determines this village was fraudulently established 
under ANCSA prior to October 1, 1998.''.

            Passed the Senate September 20 (legislative day, September 
      5), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                 Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 402.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

RITA M. RICHARDS AND CAROLINE J. RICHARDS, CO

- EXECUTRICES OF THE

ESTATE OF JAMES G. RICHARDS AND THE ESTATE OF HELEN RICHARDS,

Petitioners

v.

AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC., AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND THOMAS A. BOUCHARD,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 259 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONALD SEMENEC,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-974

[September 10, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marina Garcia-Wood, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-012440CF10C.

Brett D. McIntosh and Kevin M. Griffith of Brett D. McIntosh, P.A, 

Sarasota, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6074 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6074

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the payments from the 
        Judgment Fund in certain cases, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2016

 Mr. Fleming introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the payments from the 
        Judgment Fund in certain cases, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Taxpayer Obamacare Payouts 
`STOP' Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. NO PAYMENTS FROM JUDGMENT FUND FOR RISK CORRIDOR CASES.

    Section 1304 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no 
amount may be paid from the appropriation made by this section for any 
claim pertaining to the program under section 1342 of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18062).''.
                                 <all>
```
III

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 67

To authorize printing of the report of the Commission on Protecting and

Reducing Government Secrecy.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29, 1996

Mr. MOYNIHAN submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize printing of the report of the Commission on

Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That there shall be printed as a Senate docu3 ment the report of the Commission on Protecting and Re4 ducing Government Secrecy.

5 SEC. 2. The document referred to in the first section

6 shall be—

7 (1) published under the supervision of the Sec8 retary of the Senate; and
2

•SCON 67 IS

1 (2) in such style, form, manner, and binding as

2 directed by the Joint Committee on Printing, after

3 consultation with the Secretary of the Senate.

4 The document shall include illustrations.

5 SEC. 3. In addition to the usual number of copies

6 of the document, there shall be printed the lesser of—

7 (1) 5,000 copies for the use of the Secretary of

8 Senate; or

9 (2) such number of copies as does not exceed

10 a total production and printing cost of $45,000.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Thomas Wroe, Chief Executive Officer of Sensata Technologies B.V., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sensata Technologies B.V.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 22, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,742
<SECURITIES>                                     3,990
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,135
<PP&E>                                           5,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,552
<SALES>                                         38,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,243
<CGS>                                           19,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                       720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,513
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,513
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.1



         Schedule of Differences in Key Executive Employment Agreements

The Registrant's Employment Agreements with Eugene O'Donovan, Chairman of the
Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Susan O'Donovan
are the same in all material respects except that Mr. O'Donovan's salary is
$5,000 more then Mrs. O'Donovan's salary, and Mrs. O'Donovan's title is
Executive Vice President and Secretary.
# Official Journal C 435A/28 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 435A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6428 October 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 435A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6428 October 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| 2021/C 435 A/01 | Corrigendum to the Call for expression of interest – Financial Auditors – Junior Professionals Programme – Temporary staff (grade AD 6) ( OJ C 400 A, 4.10.2021 ) | 1 |

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2021/C 435 A/01

Corrigendum to the Call for expression of interest – Financial Auditors – Junior Professionals Programme – Temporary staff (grade AD 6) ( OJ C 400 A, 4.10.2021 )

( OJ C 400 A, 4.10.2021 )

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7199

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN RODELL JOHNSON, a/k/a Chucky,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-319-A)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Rodell Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Johnson, No. CR-95-319-A (E.D. Va. July 23,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41618 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ROBERTO CASTANEDA-SILVA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-625-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Roberto Castaneda-Silva (Castaneda) appeals the 10-year statutory minimum sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that he was entitled to a safety-valve sentence below the statutory minimum because he truthfully provided the Government with information about the crime. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5); 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-41618

2 The distri ct court did not commit clear error by finding that Castaneda made inconsistent statements to the Government about the number of smuggling trips he made and was thus not completely truthful in his disclosures to the Government. Castaneda failed to show that he was entitled to the safety valve reduction. See United Statesv. Edwards, 65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir. 1995). Castaneda also contends that he should have received a downward departure from the advisory sentencing range because he participated in the criminal activity under duress. See U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12. This contention is moot because Castaneda cannot avoid the statutory minimum sentence by way ofthe safety valve. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.