NUMBER 13-11-00551-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN ANTONIO CASTILLO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Juan Antonio Castillo, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction 

for aggravated assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on June 15, 2011. No motion for new trial 

was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on August 10, 2011. On November 8, 2012, the 

Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely 
2

perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was 

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. Appellant 

has not responded to this notice. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended 

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The 

time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline 

for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before July 15, 2011. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time to file 

his notice of appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 and did not 

file his notice of appeal until August 10, 2011.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). AWhen a 

notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of 

time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.@ Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Absent 

a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address 

the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998). 

Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of 

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the 
3

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 31st

day of January, 2013.