alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8582

ELLIS HARVEY MARSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JEB S. CREWS, Unit Supervisor,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-518-5-HC-F)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellis Harvey Marsey, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that

such a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a

certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Marsey v. Crews, No. CA-95-518-5-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 7,

1995). We further deny Appellant's motions for the appointment of

counsel, to be heard as a pro se Appellant, and for relief from

violations of rights. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14327-14328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05342]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (``OFAC'') is updating the identifying information on its 
Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (``SDN List'') 
for a person whose property and interests in property are blocked 
pursuant to Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, ``Blocking 
Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten 
To Commit, or Support Terrorism,'' as amended by Executive Order 13886 
of September 9, 2019, ``Modernizing Sanctions to Combat Terrorism''.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 14328]]

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On March 8, 2022, OFAC published the following revised information 
for the following person on OFAC's SDN List whose property and 
interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as 
amended.

Individual

    1. SAADE, Ali (a.k.a. SAADE, Ali Moussa; a.k.a. SAADI, Ali), 
Beirut, Lebanon; DOB 18 May 1942; POB Conakry, Guinea; nationality 
Lebanon; Gender Male; Secondary sanctions risk: section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as amended by Executive Order 13886; Passport 
RL0420013 (Lebanon) expires 01 Mar 2015; alt. Passport 
14205180170519 (Guinea) expires 29 May 2024; alt. Passport 18FV09784 
(France) expires 06 Feb 2029 (individual) [SDGT] (Linked To: 
HIZBALLAH).

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
Bradley T. Smith,
Deputy Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of 
the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022-05342 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
#### Abraham Moliver, as Administrator of the Estate of Isidore Moliver, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Samuel Knebel, Respondent.

Submitted January 3, 1944;

decided January 13, 1944.

*823
      *Morris Felder*for motion.

! *Harry J. McDermott*opposed.

Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements on the ground that the judgment does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
CERTIFICATIONI, Kokmeng Koh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 24 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct period reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 28, 2007   /s/ Kokmeng Koh     Kokmeng Koh  Second Vice President
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7088 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to establish a permanent program 

to provide tuition assistance to members of the Air National Guard. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. JACKSON of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Mississippi) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to establish a 

permanent program to provide tuition assistance to members of the Air National Guard. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Guard Standard5 izing Tuition Assistance To Unify the Services Act of 

6 2024’’ or the ‘‘Air Guard STATUS Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7088 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE TO MEMBERS 

2 OF AIR NATIONAL GUARD. 

3 The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish a per4 manent program to pay, under section 2007 of title 10, 

5 United States Code, all or a portion of the charges of an 

6 educational institution for the tuition or expenses of a 

7 member of the Air National Guard who is in compliance 

8 with the training requirements under regulations pre9 scribed under section 502(a) of title 32, United States 

10 Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Charles STEPHENS, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 15-60910 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 4, 2017

Robert D. Kolken, Esq., Kolken & Kolken, Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner

Claire L. Workman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for-Respondent

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Charles Stephens is a native of Guyana and citizen of the United Kingdom who was ordered removed based on his commission of an aggravated felony. He petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying as untimely his motion to reconsider or reopen. He argues that the BIA erred by concluding that he was not entitled to equitable tolling. He further argues that his prior counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not arguing that his offense did not involve more than $10,000 because there is no indication that the district court made such a finding. The record undermines this assertion, as it shows that the district court adopted the presentence report, which found that the offense involved more than $10,000.

Because Stephens was ordered removed based on his commission of an aggravated felony, and. because his arguments concerning equitable tolling and ineffective assistance of counsel do not present substantial constitutional claims, we lack jurisdiction. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D); *Assaad v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 471, 474-76 (5th Cir. 2004). The petition is, therefore, DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
## F2002-00520

DRAFT AGENDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW ROOM 1E-245 WASHINGTON, DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127 TELEFAX: 202-586-4617 DATE AND TIME: MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001 9:00 A.M.

- 5:00 P.M. PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP The purpose ofthis public workshop is to hear the views ofinterested persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider updated energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department will consider the views presented and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking. I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS II. AGENDA REVIEW III. COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS

- TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION A. Introduction B. Market and Technology Assessment C. Screening Analysis D. Engineering Analysis 1. Equipment Efficiency and Cost Analysis 2. Building Energy Use and Electric Load Shape Characterization 

### F2002-00520

DRAIT AGENDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OFENERGY OFFICE"OF ENERGY EFFICIENCYAND RENEWABLE ENERGY PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDIT]ONERS AND HEAT PUMPS PLACE OFWORKSHOP:

DATE AND TIME:

PURPOSE OFTHE WORKSHOP FORRESTAL BUILDING 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW ROOM lE-245 WASHINGTON, DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127 TELEFAX: 202-586-4617 MONDAY, OCTOBER 1,2001 9:00 A.M.

- 5:00 P.M.

The purpose ofthis public workshop is to heartheviews ofinterested persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider updated energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department will considerthe views presented and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking. I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS II. AGENDA REVIE\V III. COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPSTOPICS FORDISCUSSION A. Introduction B. Market and Technology Assessment 

## C. ScreeningAnalysis D. EngineeringAnalysis 

### 1. EquipmentEfficiency and CostAnalysis 2. BuildingEnergy Use and Electric Load Shape CharacterizationE. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis F. Consumer Sub-group Analysis G. National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Analysis H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis I. Employment Impact Analysis J. Utility Impact Analysis K. Environmental Impact Analysis IV. ADJOURNMENT E. Life-Cycle CostAnalysis F. ConsumerSub-groupAnalysis 

### G. National**Ener~y** Savings and Net PresentValue Analysis H. ManufacturerImpact Analysis I.EmploymentImpactAnalysis J. Utility ImpactAnalysis K. EnvironmentalImpactAnalysis IV. ADJOURNMENT
Order filed January 27, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00928-CV

____________

ALICE M. JONES, Appellant

V.

ANTONIO MURILLO INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A TIGER 

CONSTRUCTION AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 

MINORITY CONTRACTORS OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-76136

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed February 07, 2014. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain Order Granting Bill of Review and Vacating 

Underlying Judgment, filed January 24, 2012 (signed January 30, 2012).
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before Tuesday, February 06, 2015, containing Order Granting Bill of 

Review and Vacating Underlying Judgment, filed January 24, 2012 (signed 

January 30, 2012).

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 688 

To reduce the rate of pay for Members of Congress by 10 percent and 

to eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2015 

Mr. LOEBSACK (for himself, Mrs. BUSTOS, and Mr. ASHFORD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To reduce the rate of pay for Members of Congress by 

10 percent and to eliminate automatic pay adjustments 

for Members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Halt in 

5 Pay Increases and Cut Congressional Pay Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 688 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN PAY. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a) of the Legislative 

3 Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501) is amended 

4 to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 601. (a) Effective as of the beginning of the 

6 first applicable pay period commencing after the date on 

7 which is held the next regularly scheduled general election 

8 for Federal office following the date of the enactment of 

9 the Congressional Halt in Pay Increases and Cut Congres10 sional Pay Act, the annual rate of pay for— 

11 ‘‘(1) each Senator, Member of the House of 

12 Representatives, and Delegate to the House of Rep13 resentatives, and the Resident Commissioner from 

14 Puerto Rico, 

15 ‘‘(2) the President pro tempore of the Senate, 

16 the majority leader and the minority leader of the 

17 Senate, and the majority leader and the minority 

18 leader of the House of Representatives, and 

19 ‘‘(3) the Speaker of the House of Representa20 tives, 

21 shall be equal to the annual rate of pay for that position 

22 as of the date on which such general election is held, re23 duced by 10 percent.’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef25 fect as of the date on which is held the next regularly 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 688 IH

1 scheduled general election for Federal office following the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-18 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Inc.,
     as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Wells Fargo
     Bank, N.A. as Securities Administrator.

     Dated: June 30, 2008

     /s/ Michelle Gill
     Michelle Gill, Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6960 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6960

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR 
              CHILDREN.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended by striking ``and $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 
2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``$22,334,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2020 through 2024, and $24,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2025 
through 2029''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6960

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YU HUA WANG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10224

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 27, 2017

Garth R. Backe, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USNMI—Office of the US Attorney, Saipan, MP, Ross K. Naughton, USSAC— Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Yu Hua Wang, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yu Hua Wang appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Wang’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Wang the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Wang waived his right to appeal his sentence, with the exception of claims based on prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, and the involuntariness of his plea. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the voluntariness of Wang’s plea or any prosecutorial misconduct. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009). We decline to address on direct appeal any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. *See United States v. Rahman,*642 F.3d 1257, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 2011).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.