alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QH1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche
   Bank Trust Company Americas.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0779 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0779

**2003/779/EC: Commission Decision of 31 October 2003 laying down animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of animal casings from third countries (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 3988) **

*
Official Journal L 285 , 01/11/2003 P. 0038 - 0041 *

Commission Decision

of 31 October 2003

laying down animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of animal casings from third countries

(notified under document number C(2003) 3988)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/779/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/118/EEC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A(1) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC(1), as last amended by Commission Decision 2003/721/EC(2), and in particular Article 10(2)(a) and (c) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Decision 94/187/EC of 18 March 1994 laying down animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of animal casings from third countries(3) has been substantially amended several times(4). In the interests of clarity and rationality, the said Decision should be codified.

(2) Annex I(2) to Directive 92/118/EEC allows the importation from any third country of animal casings which have undergone a prescribed treatment.

(3) The animal health conditions and veterinary certification must be laid down in order to guarantee that the prescribed treatment of the casings is carried out.

(4) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Member States shall authorise the importation from any third country of animal casings accompanied by a health certificate as laid down in Annex I, which shall consist of one sheet and shall be completed in at least one official language of the Member State carrying out the import control.

Article 2

Decision 94/187/EC is repealed.

References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to this Decision and read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex III.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 62, 15.3.1993, p. 49.

(2) OJ L 260, 11.10.2003, p. 21.

(3) OJ L 89, 6.4.1994, p. 18.

(4) See Annex II to this Decision.

ANNEX I

>PIC FILE= "L_2003285EN.003902.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2003285EN.004001.TIF">

ANNEX II

Repealed Decision and its successive amendments

>TABLE>

ANNEX III

CORRELATION TABLE

>TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0688 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0688

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 688/2002 of 22 April 2002 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Panellets) **

*
Official Journal L 106 , 23/04/2002 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 688/2002

of 22 April 2002

supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 on the entry of certain names in the register of certificates of specific character provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs (Panellets)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92 of 14 July 1992 on certificates of specific character for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92, Spain has forwarded an application to the Commission for the name "Panellets" to be entered in the register of certificates of specific character.

(2) The description "traditional speciality guaranteed" can only be used with names entered in that register.

(3) No objection under Article 8 of that Regulation was sent to the Commission following the publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities(2) of the name set out in the Annex hereto.

(4) As a consequence, the name set out in the Annex should be entered in the register of certificates of specific character and thereby protected as a traditional speciality guaranteed within the Community pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

(5) The Annex hereto supplements the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2301/97(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 244/2002(4),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name in the Annex hereto is added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2301/97 and entered in the register of certificates of specific character in accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/92.

It shall be protected in accordance with Article 13(1) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 April 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 9.

(2) OJ C 5, 9.1.2001, p. 3.

(3) OJ L 319, 21.11.1997, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 39, 9.2.2002, p. 11.

ANNEX

Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares

- Panellets
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0432 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0432

**2003/432/CFSP: Council Decision 2003/432/CFSP of 12 June 2003 on the launching of the European Union military operation in the Democratic Republic of Congo **

*
Official Journal L 147 , 14/06/2003 P. 0042 - 0042 *

Council Decision 2003/432/CFSP

of 12 June 2003

on the launching of the European Union military operation in the Democratic Republic of Congo

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17(2) and Article 25 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Joint Action of 2003/423/CFSP of 5 June 2003 on the European Union Military Operation in the Democratic Republic of Congo(1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) On 30 May 2003, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1484 (2003) authorising, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the temporary deployment of an interim emergency multinational force in Bunia, in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

(2) Following the request by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the European Union has decided to provide a temporary stabilisation force in the Ituri Region in implementation of the mandate provided in the UNSC Resolution 1484 (2003) of 30 May 2003.

(3) The Council has authorised the Political and Security Committee to take relevant decisions concerning the political control and strategic direction of the operation.

(4) In conformity with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not participate in the financing of the operation,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Operation Plan is approved.

Article 2

The Rules of Engagement Authorisation message is approved.

Article 3

The EU military operation in the Democratic Republic of Congo shall be launched on 12 June 2003.

Article 4

The Operation Commander is hereby authorised with immediate effect to release the activation order (Actord) in order to execute the deployment of the forces, prior to transfer of authority following their arrival in theatre, and start execution of the mission.

Article 5

Without prejudice to Article 15 of the Joint Action 2003/423/CFSP, this Decision will remain in effect until such time as the forces committed to the operation in Bunia have been re-deployed.

Article 6

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2003.

For the Council

The President

G. Drys

(1) OJ L 143, 11.6.2003, p. 50.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DARRELL EDWARD TAYLOR,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 112 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of October, 2016, the Application for Leave to Exceed** 

**Word Limitations is** DENIED **. Petitioner is** DIRECTED **to file a compliant Petition for**

**Allowance of Appeal within 30 days.**
# EUR-Lex - 32002R2351 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R2351

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2351/2002 of 20 December 2002 fixing the amount of the carry-over aid and the flat-rate aid for certain fishery products for the 2003 fishing year **

*
Official Journal L 351 , 28/12/2002 P. 0027 - 0028 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2351/2002

of 20 December 2002

fixing the amount of the carry-over aid and the flat-rate aid for certain fishery products for the 2003 fishing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products(1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2814/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 relating to the grant of carry-over aid for certain fishery products(2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 939/2001 of 14 May 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 relating to the grant of flat-rate aid for certain fishery products(3), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 provides that aid may be granted for quantities of certain fresh products withdrawn from the market and either processed to stabilise them and stored or preserved.

(2) The purpose of this aid is to give suitable encouragement to producers' organisations to process or preserve products withdrawn from the market so that their destruction can be avoided.

(3) The aid level should not be such as will disturb the balance of the market for the products in question or distort competition.

(4) The aid level must not exceed the technical and financial costs associated with the operations essential to stabilising and storage recorded in the Community during the fishing year preceding the year in question.

(5) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fishery Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2003 fishing year, the carry-over aid referred to in Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 and the flat-rate aid referred to in Article 24(4) of that Regulation shall be as indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.

(2) OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 34.

(3) OJ L 132, 15.5.2001, p. 10.

ANNEX

1. Amount of the carry-over aid for products listed in Annex I(A) and (B) and for sole (Solea spp.) listed in Annex I(C) to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

>TABLE>

2. Amount of the carry-over aid for products listed in Annex I(C) to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

>TABLE>

3. Amount of the flat-rate aid for products listed in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

>TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-188107) of Gazit Globe Ltd. and in the related Prospectus of
our reports dated March 23, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2014.



|                 |  |  |  |  |  |                                 
|---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|                 |  |  |  | 
|                 |  |  | 
|                 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabby & Kasierer 
|Tel-Aviv, Israel |  |  |  |  |  | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|April 22, 2015   |  |  |  |  |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6164 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6164

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize the use of title 
       III funds for the establishment of LGBTQ resource centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2016

 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Ms. Adams, Mrs. Watson Coleman, 
  Mr. Keating, Mr. Grayson, Ms. Titus, Ms. Edwards, Ms. Norton, Mrs. 
   Lawrence, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Hastings, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. 
 Quigley, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. McNerney, Ms. Lee, 
  Mr. Pocan, Mr. Honda, and Mr. DeSaulnier) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize the use of title 
       III funds for the establishment of LGBTQ resource centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inclusive Campuses Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTERS.

    Part G of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1068 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 399A. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTERS.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, an institution 
that receives funds under this title may use a portion of such funds to 
establish an on-campus resource center that provides--
            ``(1) support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and 
        queer students; and
            ``(2) programming and education about such students to the 
        entire campus community.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Lee HAYNES Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-1878

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Filed: November 28, 2017

John E. Beamer, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael Lee Haynes, Pro Se

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lee Haynes appeals the within-Guidelines sentence the district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised re*447lease. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Haynes’s counsel has filed a brief asserting that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and moved to withdraw. After careful review of the record, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Haynes. *See United States v. Miller, 557*F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); *United States v. Petreikis, 551*F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009) (applying presumption of substantive reasonableness to revocation sentence within Guidelines range).

The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

1

. The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7164

JUSTIN VALENTINO MASON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

B. BOOKER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00864-REP-RCY)

Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Valentino Mason, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Justin Valentino Mason seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Mason’s informal brief, we

conclude that Mason has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also 

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Merle Brandon MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10043

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

OCTOBER 27, 2017

Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail Gianasi Natale, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Merle Brandon Martin, Screven, GA, pro se. •

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Merle Brandon Martin appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and the 30-month sentence imposed for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(a)(6). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Martin’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a *585motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Martin the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Martin waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id,*at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Romar BERNARD, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11197 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Romar Bernard, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ro-mar Bernard has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bernard has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no *353nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.