alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
srqT

~

s 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

0 

~~~T"94 PROS ,G~ _ 

JUN - 9 1014 

OFFICE OF 

Mr. Jose R. Franco, Manager 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 

Dear Mr. Franco: 

On April 9, 2014, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) 

waste characterization team visited Waste Control Specialists (WCS) to determine whether the 

Department of Energy (DOE) was meeting EPA's waste inventory tracking requirements at 40 CFR 

194.24(c)(4). DOE began shipping waste to the Andrews, Texas-based WCS facility in Apri12014 due 

to the temporary closure of WIPP in response to the February 2014 fire and subsequent radiological 

release. 

EPA observed unloading and storage of transuranic waste containers (namely, standard waste boxes) 

shipped to WCS from the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), interviewed WCS personnel, 

interviewed WIPP waste characterization contractor (Central Characterization Project, CCP) staff in 

Carlsbad, New Mexico and evaluated information supporting waste inventory tracking as objective 

evidence for technical adequacy. EPA concludes that the system of controls implemented by CCP at 

WCS to track waste inventory and container placement at WCS were technically adequate and ensured 

secure storage. The EPA report is enclosed and is also available at EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4- 

187. 

If you have any questions, please contact Tom Peake, Director, Center for Waste Management and 

Regulations at (202) 343-9765. 

an D. Edwards, Director 

ion Protection Division 

Enclosure 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1997 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1997

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1997/2002 of 8 November 2002 amending Regulation (EC) No 296/96 on data to be transmitted by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) **

*
Official Journal L 308 , 09/11/2002 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1997/2002

of 8 November 2002

amending Regulation (EC) No 296/96 on data to be transmitted by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy(1), and in particular Articles 5(3) and 7(5) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 16(1) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities(2) provides that the budget shall be drawn up and implemented in euro and the accounts shall be presented in euro.

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1934/2001(4), should be amended so as to bring it in line with this new provision.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 4(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 296/96 is hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2003.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 103.

(2) OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 39, 17.2.1996, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 262, 2.10.2001, p. 8.
#### Kyle E. MCCLAMMA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-14962 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(September 22, 2017)

Kyle E. McClamma, Pro Se

Yvette Rhodes, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Roger Bernard Handberg, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Respondent-Ap-pellee

Before HULL, WILSON, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Kyle McClamma, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate. In that motion, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Mr. McClamma challenged a special condition of supervised release which, as relevant here, allows him to have visitation with his older daughter only when monitored by an approved third-party supervisor.1

*665We affirm. Assuming that Mr. McClam-ma’s motion to vacate was timely filed, and that there are no procedural defaults, we conclude that Mr. McClamma is not entitled to relief. In 2011, “Mr. McClamma and the government agreed to modify the terms of supervised release to allow [him] to have contact with his older daughter when he was supervised by an approved third-party supervisor and according to a safety plan.” *McClamma,*613 Fed.Appx. at 847. Mr. McClamma, in other words, invited the very error he now seeks to correct, and that means he cannot prevail. *See United States v. Love,*449 F.3d 1154, 1157 (11th Cir. 2006) (“It is a cardinal rule of appellate review that a party may not challenge as error a ruling or other trial proceeding invited by that party”) (quoting *United States v. Ross,*131 F.3d 970, 988 (11th Cir. 1997)).2

AFFIRMED.

1

. Mr. McClamma was convicted of possessing child pornography, and sentenced to 36 months' imprisonment, to be followed by a life-long term of supervised release. In a prior appeal, we affirmed the substantive reasonableness of the special condition of supervised release and the district court’s denial of Mr. McClamma’s motion for early termination of supervised release. See *United States v. McClamma,*548 Fed.Appx. 598 (11th Cir. 2013). In another appeal, we affirmed the district court’s denial of Mr. McClamma's motion to modify the special condition of supervised release as to his older daughter. *See United States v. McClamma,*613 Fed.Appx. 846 (11th Cir. 2015).

2

. To the extent Mr. McClamma is challenging the district court’s initial imposition of supervised release with special conditions in 2006, •that challenge is untimely. *See McClamma,*548 Fed.Appx. at 600.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5967 

To amend chapter 301 of title 49, United States Code, to improve access 

to motor vehicle information, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 

Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 301 of title 49, United States Code, 

to improve access to motor vehicle information, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVED ACCESS TO MOTOR VEHICLE INFOR4 MATION. 

5 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subchapter II of chapter 301 of 

6 title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

7 section 30117 the following new section: 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5967 IH

1 ‘‘§ 30117A. Motor vehicle information made available 

2 to owners and potential purchasers 

3 ‘‘(a) MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION.—The Sec4 retary of Transportation may require that each manufac5 turer of a motor vehicle provide the following information, 

6 with regard to a specific vehicle identification number: 

7 ‘‘(1) Each original equipment manufacturer 

8 (OEM) part name included within such vehicle, a de9 scription of each such part, each part number (in10 cluding any superceded and successor OEM part 

11 number), any other part identification number and 

12 distinguishing marking of each such part, and the 

13 software of each such part (if applicable). 

14 ‘‘(2) Build sheet information. 

15 ‘‘(3) Additional information as determined by 

16 the Secretary. 

17 ‘‘(b) INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE TO OWNERS

18 AND POTENTIAL PURCHASERS.— 

19 ‘‘(1) WEBSITE ACCESS.—Each manufacturer of 

20 a motor vehicle shall provide access to the informa21 tion described under subsection (a), in a standard22 ized format, through a website to the owner of the 

23 motor vehicle and any potential purchaser of the 

24 motor vehicle (and to any designated agent of any 

25 such owner or potential purchaser). The website 

26 shall also be searchable electronically with batch acVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:43 Sep 10, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5967.IH H5967

emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5967 IH

1 cess to the information described under subsection 

2 (a), in a standardized format. 

3 ‘‘(2) COMPLIANCE.—The Secretary shall deter4 mine and ensure compliance with this paragraph.’’. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

6 The table of chapters for chapter 301 of title 49, United 

7 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat8 ing to section 30117 the following new item: 

‘‘30117A. Motor vehicle information made available to purchaser.’’. 

9 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub10 section (a) shall take effect with regard to any motor vehi11 cle sold on or after November 1, 2000. 

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act, and the amend13 ments made by this Act, shall take effect 90 days after 

14 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Order entered June 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01495-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF DORIS L. TIPPS

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-13-3072-3

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s June 8, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file 

combined reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 8, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Friday, February 13, 2015

No. 04-14-00787-CR

Matthew O. ARANDA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR2070

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due to be filed with this court on January 6, 2015. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 35.1. On January 13, 2015, this court granted court reporter Kay Gittinger’s request for a

thirty-day extension of time to file the record until February 5, 2015.

On February 9, 2015, the court reporter filed a second request for a thirty-day extension 

of time to file the reporter’s record until March 9, 2015. The request is GRANTED. The 

reporter’s record must be filed with this court not later than March 9, 2015. See id. R. 35.3(c). 

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by March 9, 2015, any requests for additional 

time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The report must 

describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. 

The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, 

and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe 

any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter 

reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date. A 

preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached to this order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 33.5


[LOGO]                                                  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                                                        Document Custody
                                                        1015 10th Avenue SE
                                                        Minneapolis, MN 55414

                                                        Appendix I

          ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform, the Company provides the following assessment of
compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.


                                WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                                By:    /s/ Shari L. Gillund
                                   -----------------------------------
                                       Shari L. Gillund

                                Its:   Senior Vice President

                                Dated: March 1, 2007
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,


AS
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.





In
connection with the annual report of interCLICK, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Garrity, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Date:
March 31, 2009





/s/ David GarrityDavid
      GarrityChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Joseph F. Bukofski, Chief Accounting Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:      /s/ Joseph F. Bukofski                         Dated: November 14, 2003
         ----------------------
         Joseph F. Bukofski
Title:   Chief Accounting Officer


                                       20
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|September 10, 2010                                
|                                                  
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey,
Jr.                       
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                              
|Executive Vice President -
Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Continuing Abatement Order filed October 15, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00256

- CR

____________ ULESSIA PROCTER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1372857



### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On August 5 , 201 5 , this c ourt directed the trial court to conduct a hearing in
this case to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. Our order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing is made, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing andthe courts findings and conclusions were to be filed with the clerk of this c ourt on

or before September 8 , 201 5 . To date, the court has not received the record or findings.

We therefore ORDER the judge of the 208th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant, appellant ’ s coun sel, if any, and counsel for the State shall participate, either in person or by video teleconference, to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and, thus entitled to a free record and appoint ed counsel on appeal. The judge may appoint appellate counsel for appellant if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of t he hearing and a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing, the court ’ s findings and conclusions, and a videotape or compact disc, if any, containing a recording of the video
teleconference s hall be filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the
date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this c ourt ’ s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this c ourt ’ s active docket when the
trial court ’ s findings and recommendations are filed in this c ourt. The c ourt will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date
from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this c ourt ’ s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of


the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bill Pereira, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: June 14, 2011





/s/    BILL PEREIRABill Pereira

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc.
(formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

          (1)  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Andrew Eracleous
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Eracleous
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


November 25, 2009