13968 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Notices 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

15See Order, 80 FR at 47904 n.19 and 47906. 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.14 For entries that 

were not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by an exporter 

individually examined during this 

review, but that entered under the case 

number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

China-wide rate (i.e., 76.46 percent).15

For any individually examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.5 percent), we will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of antidumping duties calculated for 

each importer’s examined sales and the 

total entered value of the sales, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

For respondents not individually 

examined in this administrative review 

that qualified for a separate rate, the 

assessment rate will be the dumping 

margin assigned to the mandatory 

respondent in the final results of this 

review. 

For the respondents not eligible for a 

separate rate and that are part of the 

China-wide entity, we intend to instruct 

CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment 

rate of 76.46 percent (i.e., the Chinawide entity rate) to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR that were 

exported by these companies. 

Additionally, if Commerce 

determined that an exporter under 

review had no shipments of the subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under the exporter’s case 

number will be liquidated at the Chinawide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date for the final results of 

review, as provided for by section 751 

(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters 

listed in the table above, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

in the final results of review that is 

listed for the exporter in the table; (2) 

for previously investigated or reviewed 

China and non-China exporters not 

listed in the table above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) for all China exporters 

of subject merchandise that have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate previously established for the 

China-wide entity, which is 76.46 

percent; and (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the China exporter that 

supplied that non-China exporter. The 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing these final results of 

administrative review and publishing 

this notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 4, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Final Determination of No Shipments 

V. Separate Rates 

VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Russia Should be the 

Primary Surrogate Country 

Comment 2: Whether to Correct the 

Calculation of Surrogate Value of 

‘‘Carbon Black 7’’ 

Comment 3: Whether to Value Certain 

Inputs Using Market Economy Purchases 

Comment 4: Whether to Grant Adjustments 

Reported in REBATE6U 

Comment 5: Whether to Rely on Quantities 

Shipped to Tollers Rather Than 

Quantities Consumed as Facts Available 

Comment 6: Whether to Grant a Separate 

Rate to Qingdao Landwinner Tyre Co., 

Ltd. 

Comment 7: Whether to Grant a Separate 

Rate to Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd. 

Comment 8: Whether to Apply the Cohen’s 

d Test 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–05209 Filed 3–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–914] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Hangzhou 

Ailong Metal Products Co., Ltd. (Ailong) 

made U.S. sales of light-walled 

rectangular pipe and tube (LWRPT) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) at less than normal value during 

the period of review (POR) August 1, 

2019, through July 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 11, 2022. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Notices 13969 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 50054 (September 7, 

2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and 

the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (Order). 

3See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

4See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

5See Order, 73 FR at 45403. 

6 Id. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0835. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 24, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

For details regarding the events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 2

The scope of the Order is certain 

welded carbon quality light-walled steel 

pipe and tube, of rectangular (including 

square) cross section, having a wall 

thickness of less than 4 millimeters. For 

a full description of the scope, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

sections in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is in the appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. The 

signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

We made no changes to the 

Preliminary Results. 

Separate Rates 

No parties commented on our 

preliminary separate rate findings. 

Therefore, we have continued to grant 

Ailong (the mandatory respondent) 

separate rate status. 

Final Results of Review 

We are assigning following dumping 

margin to the firm listed below for the 

period August 1, 2019, through July 31, 

2020: 

Producer or exporter 

Weighted 

average 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hangzhou Ailong Metal 

Products Co., Ltd .............. 157.40 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in a proceeding the 

calculations performed in connection 

with a final results of review within five 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, here, Commerce 

made no adjustments to the margin 

calculation methodology used in the 

Preliminary Results; therefore, there are 

no calculations to disclose for the final 

results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review.3

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication date of 

the final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.4 For entries that 

were not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by an exporter 

individually examined during this 

review, but that entered under the case 

number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

China-wide rate (i.e., 264.64 percent).5

For any individually-examined 

respondent whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent), we will calculate 

importer-specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of antidumping duties calculated for 

each importer’s examined sales and the 

total entered value of the sales, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6

For the respondents not eligible for a 

separate rate and that are part of the 

China-wide entity, we intend to instruct 

CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment 

rate of 264.64 percent (i.e., the Chinawide entity rate) to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR that were 

exported by these companies. 

Additionally, if Commerce determines 

that an exporter under review had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries that entered 

under that exporter’s case number will 

be liquidated at the China-wide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

review, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

exporters listed in the table above, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the final results of review 

that is listed for the exporter in the 

table; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed China and non-China 

exporters not listed in the table above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate published 

for the most recent period; (3) for all 

China exporters of subject merchandise 

that have not been found to be entitled 

to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate previously established 

for the China-wide entity, which is 

264.64 percent; and (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
13970 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2022 / Notices 

1See Ripe Olives from Spain: Preliminary Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 

2019, 86 FR 50022 (September 7, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Ripe Olives from Spain: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ 

dated December 6, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Ripe 

Olives from Spain; 2017–2018,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the China exporter that 

supplied that non-China exporter. The 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant POR entries. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 7, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–05210 Filed 3–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–469–818] 

Ripe Olives From Spain: Final Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

producers/exporters of ripe olives from 

Spain received countervailable 

subsidies during the period of review 

(POR), January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable March 11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Kolberg or Dusten Hom, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1785 and (202) 482–5075, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this review on September 7, 

2021, and invited comments from 

interested parties.1 On December 6, 

2021, Commerce extended the deadline 

for the final results of this 

administrative review until March 4, 

2022.2 For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

ripe olives from Spain. For a complete 

description of the scope of this order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by the interested 

parties in their case and rebuttal briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of these issues is 

identified in the appendix to this notice. 

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties, we revised the 

calculation of the net countervailable 

subsidy rates for the respondents: Agro 

Sevilla Aceitunas S.COOP Andalusia 

(Agro Sevilla) and Angel Camacho 

Alimentacion S.L. (Camacho). For a 

discussion of these issues, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). For each of the subsidy programs 

found to be countervailable, we 

determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a 

government-provided financial 

contribution that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.4 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum contains a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying Commerce’s conclusions, 

including any determination that relied 

upon the use of facts otherwise 

available, including, adverse facts 

available, pursuant to sections 776(a) 

and (b) of the Act. 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review 

There are three companies for which 

a review was requested and not 

rescinded, and which were not selected 

as mandatory respondents or found to 

be cross owned with a mandatory 

respondent. For these companies, 

because the rates calculated for the 

mandatory respondents, Agro Sevilla 

and Camacho, were above de minimis 

and not based entirely on facts 

available, we are applying to the nonselected companies the weighted 

average of the net subsidy rates 

calculated for Agro Sevilla and 

Camacho, which we calculated using 

the publicly-ranged sales data submitted 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1