alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearing s Washington , D.C .

FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATION , Complainant , V
. CLOU D DANCE RAVIATIO N Respondent . FAA DOCICETNO . CPIOSOOOO I (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) (Judg e J . E . Sullinvan ) 

# fftft 3 - o l ^ •^\ V • • y 

# 'W k

r >

u j ~t= - — x -— i I n
NOTIC E O FTAKIN G DEPOSITIO N PUCE S TECU M To ; Andre aMichell e Harper , Esq . Offic e o f Regional Counsel , ASO-7 , Southern Regio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 . Atlanta , GA 3032 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 PLEAS E TAKE NOTIC E that , pursuan t t o 1 4 CFR§13.220 , undersigne dcounse l for th e Respondent , Clou dDance r Aviation , wil l tak e th e followin g deposition s befor e perso n authorize db y la w t o take depositions , a t th e location , time s anddat e state dbelow : LOCATION : DATE : TIME : DEPONENTS : Fligh t Standard s Distric t

Offic e 595 0 Hazeitin e Nationa l Drive , Suit e 500 , Orlando , F l 3282 2 January 4 , 201 2 10:0 0 a m FSD O Inspecto r

Larry Enlow e FSD O Manage r

Dian e Frau m Inspecto r Frank Webne r Supervisor , Robert o Echevarri a 

# RE C JA N 

## - \ 201 2 

# HEARIN G DOCKE Tupo n oral examination , whic h wil l continu e fromhour-to-hou r an dfromday-to-da y unti l completed , fo

r th e purpos e o f

discovery , evidenc e fo

r us e a t tria l an dfor

any othe r

purpose s a s ar e permitte dunde r

th e applicabl e rule s o f

court . Certificat e o f

Servic e I HEREB Y CERTIF Y that o n this ^ 5 da

y o f Decembe r

2011 , on e cop y o f

th e foregoin g wa s serve di n accordanc e wit h 1 4 CFR§13.21 0 an d13.22 0 upo n th e partie s indicate dbelow , b y fa x an dU S Mail : Andre aMichelle.Harper,~Esq70ffice'of'RegibharC6unsel;ASO-7 , Sbuth~efn'Regibh , P!0' . Box'20636,' " Atlanta , GA 30320 , FAX : 404-305-522 3 The Honorabl e J . E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judge , Office o f

Hearings , M-20 , U.S . Dept . o f Transportation , 120

0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E. , Eas t BIdg . GroundFloor , Roo

mE12-320 , Washington , DC 20590 , FAX : 202-366-7536 , Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , FAA , AGC-430 , Suit e 2WI000 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Bldg. , 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , SW , Washington , D C 20591 . Respectfijll y submitted , Denni s R . Haber , PA 892 5 S W 14 8 Street , Suit e 20 0 Miami , F l 3317 6 Phone : 305-256-300 2 Fax : 305-256-30Q 4

Denni s K . Hafeet , Esq . FBN : 660817 ^
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Janine Padron, Appellant

No. 06-18-00087-CV v.

Catholic Diocese of Austin a/k/a Roman 

Catholic Diocese of Austin; Its Agents, 

Servants, and Employees; and St. Ignatius 

The Martyr Middle School, Appellee

Appeal from the 250th District Court of 

Travis County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. D-1-GN16-004298). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Janine Padron, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 10, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Pana-Minerales S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: December 14, 2011




/s/ Harry RuskowskyHarry RuskowskyPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, of Aprecia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Isaac Onn, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: June 20, 2012
By:
/s/ Isaac OnnName:
Isaac OnnTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6371 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor posthumously 

to Doris Miller for acts of valor during World War II while a member 

of the Navy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the President to award the Medal of Honor 

posthumously to Doris Miller for acts of valor during 

World War II while a member of the Navy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR AWARD OF MEDAL OF 

4 HONOR TO DORIS MILLER FOR ACTS OF 

5 VALOR AS A MEMBER OF THE NAVY DURING 

6 WORLD WAR II. 

7 Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sec8 tions 6248(a) and 6250 of title 10, United States Code, 

9 or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6371 IH

1 of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed 

2 Forces, the President is authorized to award the Medal 

3 of Honor posthumously under section 6241 of such title 

4 to Doris Miller (service number 356–12–35) for acts of 

5 valor during World War II while a member of the United 

6 States Navy. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 97-20948

_______________

JOYCE RILEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL;

DR. BRANISLAV RADOVANCEVIC; O. HOWARD FRAZIER, M.D.;

SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, P.A.;

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON;

BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE; TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE;

and

EDWARD K. MASSIN, M.D.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________

(Opinion November 15, 1999, 5 Cir., ___ F.3d

___)

(November 15, 1999)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER,

BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART,
* Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this

matter.

PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

The internal procedures of this court require the precirculation, to all non-recused active judges, of a proposed

panel opinion that will create a circuit split. Those procedures

also allow any active judge to request, before the opinion is

issued, a poll on whether the case should be reheard en banc

after the opinion is issued.

A member of the court in regular active service having

requested a poll pursuant to that policy, and a majority of the

judges in regular active service having voted in favor of

granting rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court

en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The

Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; revision to meeting access code.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, March 4, 2022, concerning a briefing of the Virginia Advisory Committee. The document contained the incorrect meeting access code.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sarah Villanueva, 202-499-0263,                         *svillanueva@usccr.gov.*

### Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         on Monday, Friday, March 4, 2022, in FR Document Number 2022-04628, second column on page 12425, correct the meeting access code to: 2760 681 1173.                    

Dated: March 9, 2022.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2022-05386 Filed 3-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)



The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Authority.



/s/    WILLIAM J.
VELARDOWilliam J. VelardoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Randal A. Nardone, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Fortress Investment Group LLC; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|April 28, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Randal A. Nardone  
|(Date)         |  |  |  | Randal A. Nardone      
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0001005335
<NAME>                 Smith Barney Principal PLUS Futures Fund L.P. II
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        6,967,062
<SECURITIES>                                                 12,914,098
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   725,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             20,606,705
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               20,606,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,201,824
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   19,404,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 20,606,705
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               (721,209)
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                219,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (940,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (940,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (51.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
#### James Anton, Appellant, *v.*Mike Pappas et al., Respondents.

Argued January 7,1943;

decided February 25, 1943.

*574
      *Murray Sprung*and *Arthur M. Laufer*for appellant.

*Joseph H. Wasserman*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                                                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         MAY-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>            OCT-13-1996
<PERIOD-END>               JAN-4-1997
<CASH>                          7,642         
<SECURITIES>                        0          
<RECEIVABLES>                   7,638
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                    80,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              101,056
<PP&E>                        320,985
<DEPRECIATION>               (149,343)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                281,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          77,694
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          52,718
<PREFERRED>                     7,604 
<COMMON>                            4 
<OTHER-SE>                   (154,786)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  281,556
<SALES>                       279,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              279,905
<CGS>                         214,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 271,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              8,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (255)
<INCOME-TAX>                       95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (160)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (4.41)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (4.41)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
31/2
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Eric
E. Marin, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Loreto Resources
Corporation.
 
 2. Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have;
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:  April 14, 2009
                /s/ Eric E. MarinEric E. MarinInterim
      Principal Financial Officer
# L_2014271DE.01010201.xml

| 12.9.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 271/102 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 271/102

---

Berichtigung der Entscheidung 2003/33/EG des Rates vom 19. Dezember 2002 zur Festlegung von Kriterien und Verfahren für die Annahme von Abfällen auf Abfalldeponien gemäß Artikel 16 und Anhang II der Richtlinie 1999/31/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 11 vom 16. Januar 2003
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 11 vom 16. Januar 2003

Auf Seite 34, Anhang, Abschnitt 2.1.2.1 „Grenzwerte für Auslaugungsverhalten“, erste Fußnote:

anstatt:

| „(*) | Werden bei dem Abfall diese Grenzwerte für Sulfat nicht eingehalten, können die Annahmekriterien dennoch als erfüllt gelten, wenn die Auslaugung die folgenden Werte nicht überschreitet: 1 5000 mg/l als C0 bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg und 6 000 mg/kg bei L/S = 10 l/kg. Zur Ermittlung des Grenzwerts bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg unter anfänglichen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen ist eine Perkolationsprüfung erforderlich, während der Wert von L/S = 10 l/kg entweder durch einen Schüttelauslaugtest oder eine Perkolationsprüfung unter annähernd lokalen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen zu ermitteln ist.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(*)

Werden bei dem Abfall diese Grenzwerte für Sulfat nicht eingehalten, können die Annahmekriterien dennoch als erfüllt gelten, wenn die Auslaugung die folgenden Werte nicht überschreitet: 1 5000 mg/l als C0 bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg und 6 000 mg/kg bei L/S = 10 l/kg. Zur Ermittlung des Grenzwerts bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg unter anfänglichen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen ist eine Perkolationsprüfung erforderlich, während der Wert von L/S = 10 l/kg entweder durch einen Schüttelauslaugtest oder eine Perkolationsprüfung unter annähernd lokalen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen zu ermitteln ist.“

muss es heißen:

| „(*) | Werden bei dem Abfall diese Grenzwerte für Sulfat nicht eingehalten, können die Annahmekriterien dennoch als erfüllt gelten, wenn die Auslaugung die folgenden Werte nicht überschreitet: 1 500 mg/l als C0 bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg und 6 000 mg/kg bei L/S = 10 l/kg. Zur Ermittlung des Grenzwerts bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg unter anfänglichen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen ist eine Perkolationsprüfung erforderlich, während der Wert von L/S = 10 l/kg entweder durch einen Schüttelauslaugtest oder eine Perkolationsprüfung unter annähernd lokalen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen zu ermitteln ist.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(*)

Werden bei dem Abfall diese Grenzwerte für Sulfat nicht eingehalten, können die Annahmekriterien dennoch als erfüllt gelten, wenn die Auslaugung die folgenden Werte nicht überschreitet: 1 500 mg/l als C0 bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg und 6 000 mg/kg bei L/S = 10 l/kg. Zur Ermittlung des Grenzwerts bei L/S = 0,1 l/kg unter anfänglichen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen ist eine Perkolationsprüfung erforderlich, während der Wert von L/S = 10 l/kg entweder durch einen Schüttelauslaugtest oder eine Perkolationsprüfung unter annähernd lokalen Gleichgewichtsbedingungen zu ermitteln ist.“

---