alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### U.S. Department

of Labor December

2, 2009 Employment Standards Administration Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Washington, D.C. 20210 File Number:



# .. TO: ALL AUTHORIZED CARRIERS REPORTING WORKERS' COMPENSATION POLICIES THROUGH THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSA TIQN INSURANCE SUBJECT: REPORT OF ISSUANCE OF POLICY- PROOF OF COVERAGE FOR THE LONGSHORE AND HARBOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT AND ITS EXTENSIONS. Carriers are required
to report the issuance of policies and endorsements under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and its extensions, the Defense Base Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentalities
Act coverage
in accordance with 20 CFR
§ 703.116
as well as notices of cancellation
of policies in accordance with 20 CFR §703.114. The current manner of submission
of these reports
is by mailing

a hard copy on DOL standard form LS570 to the District Director.

It is our intention
to phase out hard copy reporting and to replace

it with electronic filing to the national office of the Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation. Electronic reporting will eliminate the need for filing ofhard copy coverage information directly to the US DOL. We have authorized the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI),
to act on industry's behalf, as the Data Collection Organization (DCO), to collect, translate and electronically transmit reports of issuance and cancellation
of policies and endorsements

in our approved format. In order to implement electronic submission, testing will begin on 12/24/09 and will include all NCCI jurisdictions (AL, AK, AZ, AR, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, OK, OR, Rl, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WV). We are requiring NCCI to provide us with three years of historical policy submissions from carriers in NCCI jurisdictions. We emphasize that NCCI acts on behalf of the reporting entities to submit issuances and cancellations
of policies and endorsements
by electronic means. They are not under contract with the Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation. Please direct any technical questions

to the NCCI, Amy Royce, at 561-893-1066.

· If you have any questions relating to this notice, please contact me on 202-693-0925

or on chamberlain.john@dol.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. JOHN CHAMBERLAIN Chief, Branch of Financial Management, Insurance and Assessments
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                      |                                    |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                      |
|                                |                                                 |                               |
| Date: March                31, 2006 | By:                                             | /s/ *JOSEPH                HEATER* |
|                                     | Joseph                Heater                              |
|                                     | Chief                  Financial                  Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUAIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,981
<SECURITIES>                                   361,204<F3>
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,149<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      1,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,727
<PP&E>                                         445,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 911,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,231
<BONDS>                                        780,781
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   911,393
<SALES>                                          7,919<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,111
<CGS>                                            8,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,649
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,389
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Notes and accounts receivable-trade are reported net of allowances for doubtful
accounts in the Statement of Financial Position.
<F2>Net sales are reported net of promotional allowances applicable to tangible
items.
<F3>Includes $345 million of secured proceeds account. This account to be used to
complete the Empress merger.
</FN>


</TABLE>
MEMO TO FILE: MEETING WITH TREATED WOOD COUNCIL- 7/20/2015 DISCUSS STATUS OF TWC PETITION FOR TREATED WOOD

## J a ... 

# cJc 

# 1-fy/e-;;

**Se~ <::A-**  **'f ov**  **r')~**

**t)~1 (M-\"t,b.v-h~**  

### Toss 

### El{ , 

## oft ..c

# El/J B12ct_ 

# efJ fJ o {y- {_ ErA OR<..K 

### EPA- 

## /o~ct?....

**F4/t,~** 

### 1o3-

**~0~** -8" **~c{g'** 

### t.//(i/t

**rt~>s ~**  lefOt . j l -..1 

# 'f(7"'"ctf3bv~~ 1o'J -Y t **o~.)** 

### 7



### ~klL **.** 

# fo1J t.a" 

# e [:III tJdll
EXHIBIT
32




STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002,


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The
undersigned, Xiqun Yu, is Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Tia II, Inc. (the “Company”). This statement is being furnished in connection
with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended  September 30, 2009 (the “Report”).




By
execution of this statement, we certify that:




The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods covered by the Report.




This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.




It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      December 18, 2009
              /s/ Xiqun YuXiqun
      YuChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5948 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5948

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 830 Kuhn Drive in Chula Vista, California, as the ``Jonathan `J.D.' 
                   De Guzman Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JONATHAN ``J.D.'' DE GUZMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 830 Kuhn Drive in Chula Vista, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jonathan `J.D.' De Guzman Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jonathan 
`J.D.' De Guzman Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 30, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5948

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 830 Kuhn Drive in Chula Vista, California, as the ``Jonathan `J.D.' 
                   De Guzman Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the filing of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter  ended  September  30, 2005 (the  "Report")  by SmartServ  Online,  Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                                                 /s/  Robert M. Pons
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Robert M. Pons
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Dated:  November 14,, 2005

                                                 /s/  Len von Vital
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Len von Vital
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      Dated:  November 14, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to SmartServ  Online,  Inc.  and will be retained by SmartServ  Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
Exhibit 27

Financial Data Schedule

"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from September 30, 1996 10QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                            9,914
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       17,845,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  11,414
<PP&E>                            46,437
<DEPRECIATION>                         (246,543)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         17,657,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             235
<BONDS>                           16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       1,212
<COMMON>                          45,873
<OTHER-SE>                        17,593,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      17,657,038
<SALES>                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  0
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     4,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (4,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (4,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      (4,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dave Andrae TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6388

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 5, 2017

Decided: November 9, 2017

Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Katherine Lee Martin, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Heather Hart Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Arlen Jagels, Senior Deputy Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order construing his second 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Guidelines as a motion to reconsider and denying it sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction, citing *United States v. Goodwyn,*596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that no provision authorizes a district court to reconsider its order on a § 3582 motion). We affirmed for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor has now filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Upon review, we grant Taylor’s petition for panel rehearing.

After the district court denied Taylor’s motion to reconsider, this court determined that the prohibition against “§ 3582(e)(2)-based motions for reconsideration” is not jurisdictional and, thus, is “waived when the government failed to assert it below.” *United States v. May,*855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, — S.Ct. —, — L.Ed.2d —, No. 17-142 2017 WL 3219499 (U.S. Oct. 2, 2017). Accordingly, the district court did not lack authority to entertain Taylor’s motion to reconsider.

Though aware that Taylor was eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782, the district court denied Taylor’s initial request for that relief as a matter of discretion. In his motion to reconsider, Taylor claimed that a prison infraction cited by the district court in its original order denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion has since been expunged. Because, under *May,*the district court had authority to consider Taylor’s motion to reconsider, we vacate the district court’s order and remand this matter to the district court so that it may reconsider Taylor’s request for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED*
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of RFG Acquisition I Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      W. Matre, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David W. Matre
              David
                W. Matre
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              February
                20, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Cruz Diosdado ARANDA, also known as Cruz D. Aranda, also known as Cruz Aranda, also known as Crus Diosdado, Jr., also known as Crus Diosdado, also known as Cruz Diosada, also known as Cruz Aranda Diosdado, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-50106 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 3, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Cruz Diosdado Aranda, Pro Se

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

*377PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Cruz Diosdado Aranda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diosdado Aranda has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Diosdado Aranda’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider these claims. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). This denial is without prejudice to collateral review: Diosdado Aranda may raise any claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. *See id.*

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Diosdado Aran-da’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, we note that, if the imposition of forfeiture was a clerical error as counsel suggests, Diosdado Aranda may move the district court to correct the judgment. *See*Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

Accordingly, the motion for leaye to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### IN RE: MEDICAL BIOMECH PARTNERSHIP, Appellant

2016-2159

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 15, 2017

Joseph Anthony Farco, Locke Lord LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant.

Amy J. Nelson, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Benjamin T. Hickman, Thomas W. Krause.

(Newman, Dyk, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed, Cir. R. 36.
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERALAVIATIONADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

# ,ECEIVED OCT2 22013 

## dEARINGDOCKET
In theMatter of: FAADOCKET No. FAA-2013-0040 MartinaireAviation, LLC Respondent

THE HONORABLE RICHARD C. GOODWIN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE FAA CaseNo.2011SW700189 (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040

RESPONSE TO ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE NOW COMES the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to pursuant to Judge Richard C. Goodwin's Order Granting Continuance. In response to Judge Goodwin's Order, the Federal AviationAdministration advises the court that it is available for the hearing in the above-captioned case on the following dates: 1. The attorney and its witnesses are available to conduct the hearing in the above-captionedmatter on the following dates: T

• February 10 through 14, 2014.

• February 19 through 21, 2014.

• February 24 through 28, 2014. Respectfully submitted this 21st day of October 2013.
ERIC E. ANDERSON Regional Counsel rruw'"\t Region

# B':;Jau~· JJame'i,/Archier, AgencyAttorney ./(By!) 222-5074 

# /

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: Martinaire Aviation, LLC, FAA Case No. 2011SW700189 I hereby certifythat on this date, I have sent via Federal Express an executed original and one copy of the Response to Order Granting Continuance addressed as follows: Federal AviationAdministration Attention: Hearing Docket, AGC 430 600 IndependenceAvenue, SW Washington DC 20591 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 washington, DC 20591 (original plus one copy) (Federal Express) I further certifythat on this date, I have sent via FAX and Federal Express a true copy of the Response toOrder Granting Continuance addressed as follows: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202) 366-7536 (Federal Express)

2I further certify that on this date, I have sent via FAX and Federal Express a true copy of the Response toOrder Granting Continuance addressed as follows: Mr. Michael L. Dworkin andAssociates Law Offices. 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, California 94104-1808 (Federal Express) Telephone: (415) 421-2500 Facsimile: (415) 421-2560

October 21, 2013

3