alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001006027
<NAME>                        Bacou USA, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                          2,202
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,174
<INVENTORY>                                    43,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               92,730
<PP&E>                                         65,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                358,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,794
<BONDS>                                       130,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           17
<OTHER-SE>                                    158,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  358,609
<SALES>                                       128,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              128,482
<CGS>                                          67,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  67,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                    7,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,382
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.76



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings as reported on the third quarter Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
                                            RESTATED
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                           283,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    174,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                    3,923,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,454,000
<PP&E>                                         5,630,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,424,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,489,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,093,000
<BONDS>                                          901,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,101,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,489,000
<SALES>                                        6,055,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,055,000
<CGS>                                          4,136,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 171,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                58,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  176,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      64,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              112,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     112,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .39
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.3
                                 ------------

                            WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

                 SERVICER'S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE


      Washington Mutual Bank (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January
1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") of the Platform
Transactions (as defined below) with the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122), except the following criteria
1(iii) and 3(i)(C) and (D), which we have concluded are either (i) not
applicable to the servicing of the mortgage loans included in the Platform
Transactions (each, a "Mortgage Loan"), or (ii) performed by other parties
with respect to the Mortgage Loans (such criteria, after giving effect to the
foregoing exceptions, the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions
covered by this Servicer's Assessment are those securitizations of pools of
mortgage loans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to
January 1, 2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions
set forth in Item 1122(d), that included one or more classes of publicly
offered securities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, and for which the Asserting Party has
an obligation to deliver an Assessment of Compliance pursuant to Item 1122
(the "Platform Transactions").

      The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing
Criterion, and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Mortgage Loans.

      Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued
an attestation report on the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period.

Dated:  March 14, 2007

                                          WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


                                          By: /s/ H. John Berens
                                              ------------------
                                             Name:  H. John Berens
                                             Title: Senior Vice President
#### Michael ELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KANAWHA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY, Defendant-Appellee, and Alan Englebert, Director, Defendant.

No. 16-2244

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 6, 2017

Michael Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.

Craig W. Snethen,'GORDON & REES, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order partially granting the Appel-lee’s motion to dismiss Ellis’ complaint and referring the matter to a magistrate judge for consideration of the remaining claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Ellis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction., We deny the Appel-lee’s motion for sanctions and a prefiling injunction because Ellis’ litigation does not warrant sanctions. See, e.g., Foley v. Fix, 106 F.3d 556, 558 (4th Cir. 1997) (sanctioning pro se litigant who filed 23 frivolous *313appeals in just over one year); Autry v. Woods, 106 F.3d 61, 63 (4th. Cir. 1997) (sanctioning pro se litigant who filed more than a dozen actions in which he threatened, harassed, or demeaned women in the criminal justice system). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ANNUAL RECLAIM AUDIT

PAGE 3 - 4 MARCH 2011

Figure 3-1

NOx Emissions and Available RTCs

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

NOx (tons)

Compliance Year

Total RTC Supply

Emissions

Similar to Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 for NOx, Table 3-2 presents aggregate 

annual SOx emissions data for each compliance year based on audited 

emissions, and Figure 3-2 compares these audited aggregate annual SOx 

emissions with the aggregate annual SOx RTC supply. Furthermore, after 

resolving outstanding issues related to two facilities’ Compliance Year 2008 SOx 

emissions, staff updated Table 3-2 to reflect a net decrease in Compliance Year 

2008’s aggregate SOx emissions of 47 tons. As shown in Table 3-2 and Figure 

3-2, RECLAIM facilities have not exceeded their SOx allocations on an 

aggregate basis in any Compliance Year since program inception. For 

Compliance Year 2009, SOx emissions were below total allocations by 31%. 

Similar to NOx RTC leftovers, the SOx RTC leftovers for the last two compliance 

years remains in excess of 20%. The data indicates that RECLAIM met its 

programmatic SOx emission reduction goals and demonstrated equivalency in 

SOx emission reductions compared to the subsumed command-and-control rules 

and control measures. Based on updated emissions taken from audited data, 

annual SOx emissions have followed a general downward trend, except for slight 

increases in Compliance Years 1997, 2005, and 2007 compared to their 

respective previous year.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DEBBIE HUGHEY,

Petitioner

v.

SEPTA

- SOUTHEASTERN

PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, EDWARD ROBINSON AND REGINA STONE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 11 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended June 30, 2011 of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth J. Mahon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









August 9, 2011


Date









By:  /s/ KENNETH J. MAHON


Kenneth J. Mahon


First Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF MAY 24 , 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD78172 Patricia Mills vs. Cerner Corporation

WD78395 Demun Walker vs. State of Missouri

WD79027 In the Interest of: J.C.V., II Juvenile Officer; Department of Social Services

Children ’s Division vs. M.R.

- A.C. (Mother)

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD 78469 State of Missouri vs. Kenneth Pickens III
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15921 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(June 6, 2017)

Andy Ross Camacho, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Daren Grove, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Wallace, appointed counsel for Carlos Vasquez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vasquez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
D. G., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2023

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Charles W. Dodson, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief of Criminal 

Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-467 and 731-TA-1164-1165 (Second Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on imports of narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (“narrow woven ribbons”) from China and antidumping duty orders on narrow woven ribbons from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on August 2, 2021 (86 FR 41514), and determined on November 5, 2021, that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 7498, February 9, 2022).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on March 7, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5292 (March 2022), entitled                     *Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from China and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-467 and 731 TA 1164-1165 (Second Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 7, 2022.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2022-05099 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### Sabrina Renee BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTEL 6, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1311

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

*817Sabrina Renee Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sabrina Renee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because it is possible that Brown could cure the defects in her complaint through amendment, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly,. we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Brown to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS*
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 73114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Draft Written Re-Evaluation for Environmental Impact Statement: 
T.F. Green Airport, Warwick, RI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability and notice of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
Draft Written Re-Evaluation for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
has been prepared for Theodore Francis Green Airport in Warwick, Rhode 
Island.

DATES: Comments must be received by January 7, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments by any of the following methods: Email: 
Richard.doucette@faa.gov Include ``Comment to T.F. Green Draft Written 
Re-Evaluation'' in the subject line Mail: Richard Doucette, 
Environmental Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration New 
England, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Doucette, Environmental 
Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration New England, 12 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803, (781) 238-7613, or at 
Richard.doucette@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is making available a Draft Written 
Re-Evaluation document, which evaluates the impacts of Runway Safety 
Areas and other airfield improvements at Theodore Francis Green Airport 
in Warwick, Rhode Island. The document will assist the FAA in 
determining the suitability of the July 2011 EIS and September 2011 
Record of Decision (ROD). The Re-Evaluation document is available for 
review during normal business hours at the following locations:

FAA New England, 16 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 781-
238-7613;
Warwick Central Library, 600 Sandy Lane, Warwick, RI, 401-739-5440;
Warwick Library, Apponaug Branch, 3267 Post Road, Warwick, RI, 401-
739-6411;
Warwick Library, Norwood Branch, 328 Pawtuxet Ave., Warwick, RI, 
401-941-7545.

    Copies of the document can be obtained by contacting Richard 
Doucette at Richard.doucette@faa.gov or 781-238-7613. It is also 
available at http://www.faa.gov/airports/new_england/
    Public comments will be accepted through January 7, 2013.

    Issued on: November 26, 2012.
Richard Doucette,
Environmental Program Manager, Airports Division, FAA New England 
Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-29744 Filed 12-5-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc. (formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/  Vasilios KoutsobinasJune 14, 2011
Vasilios KoutsobinasChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Harris Stratex
as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
Report.
 Date: September 3, 2009
    /s/ Thomas L. Cronan, IIIName:
    Thomas L. Cronan, IIITitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer