alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of WASHINGTON and State of Minnesota, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Donald J. TRUMP, President of the United States; et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17-35105

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 27, 2017

D.C. No. 2:17-ev-00141, Western District of Washington, Seattle

Before: CANBY, CLIFTON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants’ motion to hold this appeal in abeyance is denied (Docket Entry No. 178).

On our own motion, we extend the briefing schedule for this appeal. The opening brief is due March 10, 2017; the answering brief is due March 31, 2017; and the optional reply brief is due April 5, 2017.
Exhibit 33.3**[****JPMORGAN CHASE LOGO****]****Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria**     JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessingcompliance as of October 1, 2006 and for the period from October 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006(the “Reporting Period”), with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122 (d)of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”), ”), to the extent required by the relatedtransaction agreements excluding the criteria set forth in 17 CFR 229.1122(d) (1)(i)-(iv),(2)(i)-(vi), (3)(i)-(iv), and (4)(i)-(xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded are notapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securitizationtransactions covered by this report (such criteria, after giving effect to the exclusionsidentified above, the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”). This report covers the asset-backedsecurities transactions backed by residential mortgages and home equity loans, auto loans, creditcards, dealer floor plans, retail installment contracts and manufactured housing contracts forwhich transactions the Asserting Party performs the applicable servicing criteria, that wereregistered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, where the related asset-backed securities were either (1) issued during the calendar yearending December 31, 2006 or (2) issued prior to the calendar year ending December 31, 2006 andremain subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Platform”), as listed in Appendix A.     The Asserting Party has (i) used the criteria set forth in 17 CFR 229.1122(d) to assess thecompliance by the Asserting Party with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand (ii) concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period with respect tothe Platform, taken as a whole.     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued anattestation report for the Platform, on our assessment of compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this report.JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association/s/ Brian GoldmanBrian Goldman, Senior Vice President
Order filed January 31, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 01049

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A .L.L., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 20727



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 30, 2018. Appellant I.L.L. timely filed a post judgment motion. The notice of appeal was due November 28,
2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on November 30, 2018, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal.
A motion for extension of time is necessa rily implied when the perfecting instrument
is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appell ant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v.Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston

[14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before February 11, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Fred Cox, Sr v. Allen Samuels Chevrolet and Allen Samuels

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00973

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 82605

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Fred George Cox

, Sr., who is self

- represented, filed a notice of appeal that

referenced an attached “Affidavit of Poverty.” A ppellant has not made financial arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record.

In his affi davit

, appellant claimed indigence based on his unemployment, his lack of regular income

, his disability, his receipt of S ocial S ecurity benefits , and his lack of assets

. However, appellant’s submission does not conform to the form Statement of Inability t o Afford Payment of Court Costs, nor does it otherwise completely satisfy Rule 145 of the Rules of Civil

Procedure.

An appellate court may permit a party who did not file a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in the trial court to proc eed without payment of costs. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c). Within 30 days of the date of this order , appellant is ordered to file a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs in form prescribed by the Supreme Court of Texas.

See id

.
The form Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs is attached to this

order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 14, 2018
From: Risley, David

To: Szabo, Aaron

Cc: Fisher, Brian

Subject: E.O. 12866 Review: Interagency Discussion about Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (2060-

AS05)

Date: Friday, November 13, 2015 6:00:55 PM

Attachments: EO 12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_2015113 Preamble (redline).docx

EO 12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151113 RIA- RLSO.docx

EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20150113 REG TEXT - RLSO.docx

Aaron,

Here are the final redline versions of the preamble, regulatory text, and RIA.

Best,

David
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Loreto Resources Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric E. Marin, Interim Chief Financial officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Eric E. MarinName:
                Eric
      E. MarinTitle:
                Interim
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                April
      15, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                 142,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   8,454
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  41,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   2,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 225,087
<PP&E>                                               0                  50,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 634,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 180,938
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     353
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 377,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 378,312
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,684                 113,225
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,044                  94,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,640                  19,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,975                   8,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,665                  10,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,665                  10,837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19                    0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19                    0.31
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Euro  Group of  Companies,  Inc.
(formerly ICT  Technologies,  Inc.), a Delaware  corporation  (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
          section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/  Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Vasilios Koutsobinas
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2008
~-~- 

# S r

- ing ®ar -

~~ -

,-

1 June 1, 2015

TO: Honorable John Kerry Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW 

### Wasbington, D.C. 20520 DOS-2015-0016 CC: Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

### Washington, D.C. 20590 DOT-OST-2015-0082 Honorable Penny S. Pritzker Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW 

### Washington, D.C. 20230 DOC-2015-0001 Dear Mr. Kerry: Recent coverage of the battle between the tbree major U.S. airlines and the three major Middle Easten airlines has raised concerns within the travel and tourism industry. Springboard Vacations is Los Angeles's fastest growing travel company to Auatralia and the South Pacific, and we are proud to have been named the official tour operator to the Australian Open in Melbourne. Our business to Dubai and Qatar is also increasing. The Middle Eastern airlines have expanded service to points in Australasia and the Middle East. They have brought helpful competition to Qantus, Virgin Australia, and other airlines offering significant U.S.-Australia and -New Zealand flights. There are several advantages of having the Middle Eastern airlines in this market: • Fares. The more carriers vying for a slice of the U.S. traveler's dollar, the more value-based offerings are introduced. The Middle Eastern airlines are not always the lowest cost option, but their presence exerts downward preasure as other carriers strive to undercut them on price. Amenities. With several carders within a$500 range in fares, amenities can be an important consideration, especially on flights that exceed 12 hours. Etihad has recendy introduced its Residence and First Class Apartment acconunodations on some flights from Abu Dhabi to Australia, which can be attractive to a certain class of traveler. Bars and social areas, which

Spdngboard Vacations, Inc. I Reservations: 866.447.7746 1 E: infoQspnngboardvacations.com I W: www.springboardvacations.commake flights part of the tourism experience rather than dead tirne, are also becoming popular additions, with Emirates and Qatar bringing such products to market. Service quality. The U.S. airlines are not known for service. Although one can have an excellent eaperience, there is signiflcant variation from flight crew to flight crew. Somehow the U.S. airlines need to be prodded toward excellence. The increase in competition for key routes, including lucrative U.S. to Australia travel, can help spur them to make the changes travelers are demanding. Inhibiting the expansion of the Middle Eastern airlines would be a disservice to travelers and to the travel industry. I encourage your agencies to take a conservative approach in addressing Open Skies agreements. Sinc y,

Warren Grau Executive Vice President Springboard Vacations
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 747 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 747

 To require the President to notify the Congress of certain arms sales 
 to Saudi Arabia until certain outstanding commercial disputes between 
    United States nationals and the Government of Saudi Arabia are 
                               resolved.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                  May 3 (legislative day, May 1), 1995

  Mr. D'Amato (for himself and Mr. Moynihan) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the President to notify the Congress of certain arms sales 
 to Saudi Arabia until certain outstanding commercial disputes between 
    United States nationals and the Government of Saudi Arabia are 
                               resolved.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION OF ARMS SALES.

    Until the certification under section 2 is submitted to the 
Congress, section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act shall be 
applied to sales to Saudi Arabia by substituting in the first sentence 
``$10,000,000'' for ``$50,000,000'', ``$560,000,000'' for 
``$200,000,000'', and ``$2,000,000'' for ``$14,000,000''.

SEC. 2. CERTIFICATION.

    Section 1 shall cease to apply if and when the Secretary of States 
certifies and reports in writing to the Congress that the unpaid claims 
of American firms against the Government of Saudi Arabia that are 
described in the June 30, 1993, report by the Secretary of Defense 
pursuant to section 9140(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations 
Act, 1993 (Public Law 102-396; 106 Stat. 1939), including the 
additional claims noticed by the Department of Commerce on page 2 of 
that report, have been resolved satisfactorily.
                                 <all>
```
#### David A. GAMBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HERSHBERGER, PHD/Chief Psychologist, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland; Shane Sheetz, PSY/D, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland; Mr. Eirich, Lieutenant, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland; Brett Dodd, PSY/D, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland; Leon Bryan, PSY/D, Federal Correctional Institution Cumberland; 7 Unknown Officers and 3 Unknown Nurses; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6800

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 30, 2017

Decided: November 2, 2017

David A. Gambino, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

*273Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Gambino filed an action in the district court seeking preliminary injunctions to recover and preserve evidence for use in a future lawsuit against prison officials, The district court denied the motions and dismissed the complaint because the Government, once on notice of the potential lawsuit, was already obligated to preserve any existing evidence and provided documentation that it was complying with that obligation. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gambino’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gambino has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). In any event, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions for injunctive relief because Gambino.failed to demonstrate that he was likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction. *See Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc.,*555 U.S. 7, 22, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA. The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDA.                    

*Date:*                         May 3, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5:45 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personnel qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21224 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Deon M. Harvey, Ph.D.,  Management Analyst, Office of the Scientific Director, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Room 04A314, Baltimore, MD 21224, (443) 740-2466                         *deon.harvey@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 8, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-05285 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P