[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14039-14040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1306]


Certain Barcode Scanners, Mobile Computers With Barcode Scanning 
Capabilities, Scan Engines, RFID Printers, Components Thereof, and 
Products Containing the Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on February 4, 2022, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Zebra 
Technologies Corporation of Lincolnshire, Illinois and Symbol 
Technologies, LLC of Holtsville, New York. A supplement to the 
complaint was filed on February 25, 2022. The complaint, as 
supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain barcode 
scanners, mobile computers with barcode scanning capabilities, scan 
engines, RFID printers, components thereof, and

[[Page 14040]]

products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,498,942 (``the '942 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 8,411,177 (``the '177 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 10,667,219 
(``the '219 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal 
Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and a cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3673727f65057e535a467643455f425518515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50151419036318353c201025233924337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Mullan, Office of the 
Secretary, Docket Services Division, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, telephone (202) 205-1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on March 7, 2022, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1-8 and 10-26 of the '942 patent; claims 1-10 of the '177 
patent; and claims 1, 4-6, and 11-18 of the '219 patent, and whether an 
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) 
of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``barcode scan engines 
and scanners (handheld and stationary scanners), mobile computers with 
barcode scanning capabilities (handheld, tablet, and wearable 
computers), RFID printer (printers with RFID encoding capabilities), 
and components thereof (circuit boards with barcode scanning, RFID 
encoding or RFID decoding capabilities)'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

Zebra Technologies Corporation, 3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, 
Illinois 60069
Symbol Technologies, LLC, 1 Zebra Plaza, Holtsville, New York 11742

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Honeywell International Inc., 855 S. Mint Street, Charlotte, North 
Carolina 28202
Hand Held Products, Inc., 855 S. Mint Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 
28202

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating as 
a party in this investigation.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission 
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the 
complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. 
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the 
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor 
is shown.
    Failure of a respondents to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: March 7, 2022.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-05142 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>