10334 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2022 / Notices 

15 Id.; see also Appendix. 

16See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

17As noted above, Hangzhou Zhengtian 

Industrial Co., Ltd. was not subject to the first 

review final results. See Final Results. Therefore, 

this company’s entries would have liquidated 

pursuant to prior liquidation instructions. In 

addition, Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., 

Ltd., Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd., 

Karly Wood Product Limited, and Kunshan YingyiNature Wood Industry Co., Ltd. have no 

outstanding injunction for this period of review. 

Therefore, in accordance with our final remand 

redetermination and the Court’s opinion, we are not 

providing these companies with the revised rate. 

1See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 

Republic of Turkey: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 87 FR 

7118 (February 8, 2022). 

litigation and have injunctions in place 

is 0.00 percent.15

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because the companies listed in the 

appendix have a superseding cash 

deposit rate, i.e., there have been final 

results published in subsequent 

administrative reviews for the 

companies listed above, we will not 

issue revised cash deposit instructions 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP). This notice will not affect the 

current cash deposit rates for those 

exporters/producers. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

At this time, Commerce remains 

enjoined by CIT order from liquidating 

entries of subject merchandise that were 

exported by any of the companies listed 

above and that were entered into the 

United States, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption during the 

period May 26, 2011, through November 

30, 2012. These entries will remain 

enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 

injunction during the pendency of any 

appeals process. 

In the event the CIT’s ruling is not 

appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a 

final and conclusive court decision, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on 

unliquidated entries of subject 

merchandise exported by the companies 

listed above in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by the 

review when the importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is not zero or 

de minimis. Where an importer-specific 

ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,16 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 17, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

Separate Rate Companies 17

1. Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

2. Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC 

3. GTP International Limited 

4. Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd. 

5. Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd. 

6. Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood 

Industry Co., Ltd. 

7. Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd. 

8. Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., 

Ltd. 

9. Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., 

Ltd. 

10. Puli Trading Ltd. 

11. Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd. 

12. Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd. 

13. Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd. 

14. Shanghai Lizhong Wood Products Co., 

Ltd./The Lizhong Wood Industry 

Limited Company of Shanghai 

15. Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. 

16. Baishan Huafeng Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

17. Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd. 

18. Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd. 

19. Dasso Industrial Group Co., Ltd. 

20. Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

21. Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

22. Fujian Wuyishan Werner Green Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

23. Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd. 

24. Hangzhou Hanje Tec Co., Ltd. 

25. Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

26. Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd. 

27. Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

28. Jiafeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

29. Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring 

Group Co., Ltd. 

30. Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

31. Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., 

Ltd. 

32. Shanghai Eswell Timber Co., Ltd. 

33. Shanghai Shenlin Corporation 

34. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd. 

35. Zhejiang Fuma Warm Technology Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03923 Filed 2–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–829] 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From 

the Republic of Turkey: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of NoShipments; 2019–2020; Correction 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) published a notice in the 

Federal Register on February 8, 2022, in 

which Commerce announced the final 

results of the 2019–2020 administrative 

review of the antidumping duty (AD) 

order on steel concrete reinforcing bar 

(rebar) from the Republic of Turkey 

(Turkey). This notice corrects the name 

of the respondent for which we tied the 

rates for non-selected companies to in 

that determination. 

DATES: Applicable February 24, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak or Jose Rivera, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642 or (202) 482–0842, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of February 8, 

2022, in the FR Doc 2022–02638 on 

page 7119, in the second column, 

correct the last sentence in the section 

‘‘Rates for Non-Selected Companies:’’ 

‘‘Accordingly, Commerce is assigning 

Colakoglu’s rate of 1.02 percent to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination.’’ The corrected sentence 

should read: ‘‘Accordingly, Commerce 

is assigning Kaptan Demir’s rate of 1.02 

percent to companies not selected for 

individual examination.’’ 

Background 

On August 6, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

notice of the final results of the 2019– 

2020 administrative review.1 We 

inadvertently misstated in the ‘‘Rates for 

Non-Selected Companies’’ section of the 

notice that ‘‘Commerce is assigning 

Colakoglu’s rate of 1.02 percent to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination.’’ The correct rate for nonselected companies is the rate 

calculated for Kaptan Demir Celik 

Energji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S. 

(Kaptan Demir) of 1.02 percent. This 

notice serves as a notification of this 

correction to the Federal Register notice 

published on February 8, 2022. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 37 / Thursday, February 24, 2022 / Notices 10335 

1See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod 

from Korea, 63 FR 49331 (September 15, 1998); see 

also Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless 

Steel Wire Rod from Japan, 63 FR 49328 (September 

15, 1998); and Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod 

from Taiwan, 63 FR 49332 (September 15, 1998) 

(collectively, Orders). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 

FR 35070 (July 1, 2021). 

3See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan, Korea, 

and Taiwan; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 86 

FR 35124 (July 1, 2021). 

4See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 86 FR 56249 (October 8, 2021), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM). 

5See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Japan, South 

Korea, and Taiwan; Determinations, Inv. Nos. 731– 

TA–771–772 and 775 (Fourth Review), 87 FR 8878 

(February 16, 2022), see also USITC Pub. 5279 

(February 2022). 

Dated: February 17, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03922 Filed 2–23–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–843, A–580–829, A–583–828] 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Japan, 

the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: 

Continuation of the Antidumping Duty 

Orders 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) orders on stainless steel wire rod 

(SSWR) from Japan, the Republic of 

Korea (Korea), and Taiwan would likely 

lead to a continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and material injury to an 

industry in the United States, 

Commerce is publishing a notice of 

continuation of these AD orders. 

DATES: Applicable February 24, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Williams or Minoo Hatten, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5166 or 

(202) 482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 15, 1998, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

AD orders on SSWR from Japan, Korea, 

and Taiwan.1 On July 1, 2021, 

Commerce initiated,2 and the ITC 

instituted,3 sunset reviews of the 

Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

As a result of its reviews, Commerce 

determined, pursuant to sections 

751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that 

revocation of the Orders would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping. Commerce, therefore, notified 

the ITC of the magnitude of the margins 

of dumping rates likely to prevail 

should these Orders be revoked.4

On February 16, 2022, the ITC 

published its determination that 

revocation of the Orders would likely 

lead to a continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 

751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.5

Scope of the Orders 

The merchandise covered by the 

Orders is SSWR, which comprises 

products that are hot-rolled or hot-rolled 

annealed and/or pickled and/or 

descaled rounds, squares, octagons, 

hexagons or other shapes, in coils, that 

may also be coated with a lubricant 

containing copper, lime or oxalate. 

SSWR is made of alloy steels 

containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or 

less of carbon and 10.5 percent or more 

of chromium, with or without other 

elements. These products are 

manufactured only by hot-rolling or hot 

rolling annealing, and/or pickling and/ 

or descaling, are normally sold in coiled 

form, and are of solid cross-section. The 

majority of SSWR sold in the United 

States is round in cross-sectional shape, 

annealed and pickled, and later cold 

finished into stainless steel wire or 

small-diameter bar. The most common 

size for such products is 5.5 millimeters 

or 0.217 inches in diameter, which 

represents the smallest size that 

normally is produced on a rolling mill 

and is the size that most wire-drawing 

machines are set up to draw. The range 

of SSWR sizes normally sold in the 

United States is between 0.20 inches 

and 1.312 inches in diameter. 

Two stainless steel grades are 

excluded from the scope of the Orders. 

SF20T and K–M35FL are excluded. The 

chemical makeup for the excluded 

grades is as follows: 

SF20T 

Carbon 0.05 max 

Manganese 2.00 max 

Phosphorous 0.05 max 

Sulfur 0.15 max 

Silicon 1.00 max 

Chromium 19.00/21.00 

Molybdenum 1.50/2.50 

Lead-added (0.10/0.30) 

Tellurium-added (0.03 min) 

K–M35FL 

Carbon 0.015 max 

Silicon 0.70/1.00 

Manganese 0.40 max 

Nickel 0.30 max 

Chromium 12.50/14.00 

Lead 0.10/0.30 

Phosphorous 0.04 max 

Sulfur 0.03 max 

Aluminum 0.20/0.35 

The products subject to the Orders are 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 

7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 

7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of the Orders is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Orders. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect AD cash deposits at 

the rates in effect at the time of entry for 

all imports of subject merchandise. 

The effective date of the continuation 

of the Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to 

initiate the next five-year (sunset) 

reviews of the Orders not later than 30 

days prior to the fifth anniversary of the 

effective date of continuation. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return, destruction, or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which may be subject to sanctions. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1