alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 869 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 869

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, United States official 
number 646512.

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 869

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for the vessel DRAGONESSA, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.14

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                            GOODYEAR CAPITAL TRUST II


                  The undersigned Trustees of Goodyear Capital Trust II (the
"Trust"), pursuant to the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss.3801, et
seq.), HEREBY CERTIFY:

                  1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is:

                            Goodyear Capital Trust II

                  2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the
Delaware Trustee of the Trust in the state of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank
USA, National Association, c/o JPMorgan Chase Bank, Attention: Institutional
Trust Services, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Floor3/OPS4, Newark, Delaware
19713.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the Trustees
of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the 12th day of
June, 2002.


                                  DELAWARE TRUSTEE:

                                  Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association


                                  By: /s/ Dennis Kelly
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Dennis Kelly
                                           Title:  Assistant Vice President


                                  PROPERTY TRUSTEE:

                                  JPMORGAN CHASE BANK

                                  By: /s/Patrick J. Healy
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Patrick J. Healy
                                           Title:  Vice President


                                  REGULAR TRUSTEE:


                                  /s/Stephanie W. Bergeron
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                           Stephanie W. Bergeron
SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries









EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 (this "report"), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the "registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.







/s/ Gary S. Raymond

Gary S. Raymond

President and Chief Executive Officer



November 12, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Ex-3
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gil Kotler, Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 22, 2013                                      
|                                                           
|/s/ Gil Kotler                                             
|Gil Kotler                                                 
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
#### Jessica M. HARMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35117

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017 *

Filed June 28, 2017

*862Kathryn Tassinari, Esquire, Attorney, Kathryn Tassinari, Lawyer, PC, Eugene, OR, Robert A. Baron, Esquire, Attorney, Harder Wells Baron & Manning, PC, Eugene, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Adrian Lee Brown, Janice Elaine Hebert, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, DOJ-USAO, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Ap-pellee

Before: NELSON, TROTT, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Jessica Harms appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Hill v. Astrue,*698 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir. 2012), and we affirm.

An .examining psychologist’s and a reviewing psychologist’s recommendations regarding a supportive work setting did not amount to concrete work-related limitations in function that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) was required to include in his finding of the claimant’s residual functional capacity. *See Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin.,*574 F.3d 685, 691-92 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding that the ALJ properly excluded doctor’s non-imperative recommendation from residual functional capacity).

The ALJ followed the required two-step analysis in finding that Harms’s statements regarding her symptoms were “not entirely credible,” and he provided a specific, clear and convincing reason by explaining that the claimant’s testimony was contradicted in part by evidence of her activities of daily living. *See Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.,*775 F.3d 1090, 1102 (9th Cir. 2014). Substantial evidence, including evidence of such activities as driving children to school and shopping, supports the ALJ’s finding that Harms had the residual functional capacity to work in an environment with a limited amount of social interaction. *See Molina v. Astrue,*674 F.3d 1104, 1113 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that, in reaching a credibility determination, an ALJ may weigh inconsistencies between the claimant’s testimony and her daily activities).

Any error in the ALJ’s evaluation of a lay witness’s statements was harmless. The lay statements described many of the same limitations as Harms’s own testimony, and the ALJ’s reason for rejecting the claimant’s testimony—inconsistency with evidence of her activities of daily living— applies with equal force to the lay testimony. *See id.*at 1122.

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51140 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HOMOGONIO RIOS-FUENTES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-98-CR-252-ALL

-------------------- November 2, 1999 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Homogonio Rios-Fuentes appeals his guilty plea conviction for intentionally distributing morphine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Specifically, Rios-Fuentes argues that the district court erred by failing to state at his rearraignment that: 1) the court had a duty to consider applicable sentencing guidelines; 2) the court could depart from those guidelines in certain circumstances; 3) Rios-Fuentes’ statements under oathcould form the basis of a perjury prosecution; and 4) RiosFuentes had a Fifth Amendment right not to testify. Rios-FuentesNo. 98-51140 -2-

also argues that the court erred by not inquiring into the factual basis for his plea. Rios-Fuentes argues that these omissions affected his substantial rights and rendered his guilty plea invalid. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and find that the errors committed by the district court in its Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 colloquy were harmless. See United States v. Johnson , 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc); United States v. Bachynsky , 949 F.2d 722, 726 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1




     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  filing  of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter  Ended  March  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  by  SmartServ  Online,   Inc.
("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                          /s/  Sebastian E. Cassetta
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Sebastian E. Cassetta
                                         Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
                                         Dated: June 4, 2003



                                         /s/  Thomas W. Haller
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Thomas W. Haller
                                         Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial
                                         Officer & Treasurer
                                         Dated:  June 4, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to SmartServ  Online,  Inc.  and will be retained by SmartServ  Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 677

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To repeal a redundant venue provision, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1392 of title

5 28, United States Code, is repealed.

6 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of

7 section 1392 of title 28, United States Code, is amended

8 by striking ‘‘(b) Any’’ and inserting ‘‘Any’’.

Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June

19), 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2009 |  | /s/ Todd Newton                                  
|                         |  | Todd Newton                                      
|                         |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to ArthroCare Corporation and will be retained by ArthroCare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DAVIDSON &COMPANY LLP Chartered Accountants                 A Partnership of Incorporated Professional   Exhibit 15.1          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 20-F of Horizon Industries Ltd. of our report dated May 30, 2007 appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference of us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.       /s/ DAVIDSON & COMPANY LLP  Vancouver, CanadaChartered AccountantsFebruary 12, 2008
  1200 - 609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V7Y 1G6 Telephone (604) 687-0947  Fax (604) 687-6172
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 FINANCIAL  STATMENTS OF SMARTSERV ONLINE,  INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001005698
<NAME>                        SMARTSERV ONLINE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          1,320,859
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     133,162
<ALLOWANCES>                        6,000
<INVENTORY>                        41,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,489,664
<PP&E>                            968,373
<DEPRECIATION>                    275,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,249,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,338,178
<BONDS>                           120,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           36,950
<OTHER-SE>                        754,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,249,882
<SALES>                           381,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  381,787
<CGS>                           1,146,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,146,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,160,227
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,031,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,933,380)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,933,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,933,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.79)
                                        


</TABLE>
#### Josiah Brigham, Petitioner, *versus*Thomas J. Elliot.

Petition for a review by a trustee.

*Cushing*for the petitioner.

*Loud*for the respondent, the plaintiff in the original action

*Nov. 5th*

It was held in this case, that where it appeared on a petition, that one had been charged as a trustee, in the Court of Common Pleas, by accident or mistake, when in truth he ought to have been discharged, it is within the power of this Court, under the statute, to grant him a writ of review, returnable in this Court, on which the judgment thus erroneously rendered may be corrected. *St.*1791, *c.*17, § *2.*
      *1*

Upon the answers, trustee discharged.

Rev. Stat. *c.*99, § 19.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 720 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 720

 To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to 
representations in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 1995

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relating to 
representations in court and sanctions for violating such rule, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. REPRESENTATIONS AND SANCTIONS UNDER RULE 11 OF THE FEDERAL 
              RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

    (a) In General.--Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(3) by striking out ``or, if 
        specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary 
        support after a reasonable opportunity for further 
        investigation or discovery'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``or 
        are well grounded in fact''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in the first sentence by striking out ``may, 
                subject to the conditions stated below,'' and inserting 
                in lieu thereof ``shall'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2) by striking out the first and 
                second sentences and inserting in lieu thereof ``A 
                sanction imposed for violation of this rule may consist 
                of reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses 
                incurred as a result of the violation, directives of a 
                nonmonetary nature, or an order to pay penalty into 
                court or to a party.''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2)(A) by inserting before the 
                period ``, although such sanctions may be awarded 
                against a party's attorneys''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall take 
effect 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**PowerCerv
        Corporation and Subsidiary**
 **Form
        10-QSB/A**
  **EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 **Pursuant
        to 18 United States Code Section 1350**
 
 
 The
        undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for
        the
        quarter ended March 31, 2005 of PowerCerv Corporation (the "Company") filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ John
                D StantonJohn
                D StantonChief
                  Executive Officer
                September
                  26, 2005
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        PowerCerv Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Anoka Air v MAC Reply**  **- Exhibits 1 thru 4** 

CD containing Audio files are located in the office FAA Docket @ 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC