alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-1999 
<PERIOD-START>                                   JUL-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-1999 
<CASH>                                            13,242,000 
<SECURITIES>                                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,274,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         154,000 
<INVENTORY>                                                0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  17,351,000 
<PP&E>                                             8,988,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     3,799,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    29,501,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,180,000 
<BONDS>                                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             146,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                        19,269,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      29,501,000 
<SALES>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  10,979,000 
<CGS>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     15,396,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   878,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (5,038,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         125,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (5,163,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (5,163,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (0.42)
                                                  


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Victor Salerno, certify that;
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
 those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
 reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
 equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: December 15, 2003
 
 /s/  Victor Salerno
 By: Victor Salerno
 Title: Chief Executive Officer
   1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
1999, and the unaudited statement of income for the three months
then ended contained in the report on Form 10-Q for the six
months ended June 30, 1999 of Batteries Batteries, Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (756)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,056
<PP&E>                                           1,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                     397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,515
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,102
<SALES>                                         22,579
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,579
<CGS>                                           14,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    583
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       303
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
# L_2008307EN.01002101.xml

| 18.11.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 307/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 307/21

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 807/2001 of 25 April 2001 amending Annexes I, II and III to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 118 of 27 April 2001
  )

On page 10, in the Annex, in point A, amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90, the table in point 2.2.3, ‘Pyrethroids’ is replaced as follows:

| Pharmacologically active substance(s) | Marker residue | Animal species | MRLs | Target tissues | Other provisions |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘Cyfluthrin | Cyfluthrin (sum of isomers) | Bovine, caprine | 50 μg/kg | Fat | |
| 10 μg/kg | Liver |
| 10 μg/kg | Kidney |
| 20 μg/kg | Milk | Further provisions in Council Directive 94/29/EC are to be observed’ |

Pharmacologically active substance(s)

Marker residue

Animal species

MRLs

Target tissues

Other provisions

‘Cyfluthrin

Cyfluthrin (sum of isomers)

Bovine, caprine

50 μg/kg

Fat

10 μg/kg

Liver

10 μg/kg

Kidney

20 μg/kg

Milk

Further provisions in Council Directive 94/29/EC are to be observed’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,725
<SECURITIES>                                   102,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,019<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                      1,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,847
<PP&E>                                         192,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,113
<BONDS>                                        297,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   465,780
<SALES>                                          5,250<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,040
<CGS>                                            5,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,243
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-TRADE ARE REPORTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS.
<F2>NET SALES ARE REPORTED NET OF PROMOTIONAL ALLOWANCES APPLICABLE TO TANGIBLE
ITEMS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0961 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0961

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 961/2002 of 5 June 2002 fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 2001/02 marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 148 , 06/06/2002 P. 0018 - 0018 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 961/2002

of 5 June 2002

fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 2001/02 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 453/2002(2), and in particular Article 9(8) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 provides for aid to be granted to storage agencies for the quantities of sultanas, currants and dried figs that they buy in and for the actual duration of storage.

(2) Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 449/2001 of 2 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the aid scheme for products processed from fruit and vegetables(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1343/2001(4), lays down the dates of the marketing years.

(3) The storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs from the 2001/02 marketing year should be fixed and, to that end, account should be taken of Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1622/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 as regards the scheme for the storage of unprocessed dried grapes and unprocessed dried figs(5) and of the fact that the storage aid is to be calculated on the basis of the technical cost of storage and of financing the buying-in price paid for the products.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Products Processed from Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For products from the 2001/02 marketing year, the storage aid provided for in Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 shall be:

(a) EUR 0,1405 per day and per tonne net weight until 28 February 2003 and EUR 0,1144 per day and per tonne net weight from 1 March 2003 for dried grapes;

(b) EUR 0,1261 per day and per tonne net weight for dried figs.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 June 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 72, 14.3.2002, p. 9.

(3) OJ L 64, 6.3.2001, p. 16.

(4) OJ L 181, 4.7.2001, p. 16.

(5) OJ L 192, 24.7.1999, p. 33.
#### Daniel ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. Colston JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; Kathleen A. Ortiz, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6675

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 2017

Decided: September 28, 2017

Daniel Rose, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior ■ Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Rose appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Rose v. Jones,*No. 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. filed May 15, 2017, entered May 16, 2017), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 17365 and # 17366; ALABAMA Disaster Number AL-00126]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Alabama dated 03/07/2022. *Incident:*
                         Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         02/03/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 03/07/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/06/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/7/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Hale. *Contiguous Counties:* Alabama: Bibb, Greene, Marengo, Perry, Tuscaloosa. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.880Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.940Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17365 C and for economic injury is 17366 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Alabama. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-05157 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

In The Matter Of: FRIENDSHIP AIRWAYS, INC., dba YELLOW AIR TAXI, and CHRISTOPHERBEHNAM
Enforcement Proceeding WASHINGTON, D. C.
Served August 8, 2014

Docket OST-2013-0066 Judge J.E. Sullivan

Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings Notice ofIntent to Respond to Order Deeming Well-Pleaded Facts Admitted, Reserving Entry ofDefault Judgment, and Setting Deadline for Filing Supplemental Proof The Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("OAEP") hereby files this Notice oflntent to respond to Your Honor's Order Deeming Well-Pleaded Facts Admitted, Reserving Entry ofDefault Judgment, and Setting Deadline for Filing Supplemental Proof("Order"). In response to the holdings ofthe Order, served onJuly 22, 2014, the OAEP elects to present supplemental documentary proofon orbefore September 26, 2014, in support of: (1) its allegation that Respondent Mr. Christopher Behnam as the President and owner ofRespondent Friendship Airways, Inc., d/b/a Yellow Air Taxi ("Friendship"), was a "central figure" in Friendship's activities prior to October 18, 2011, and may be held personally liable for Friendship's violations of 14 CFR 374.3 and 49 U.S.C. § 41712; and (2) its request for the proposed civil penalty of$67,500 against Friendship and Mr. Behnam,jointly and severally, as well as proofin support ofthe prospective affirmative reliefsought against Mr. Behnam

### 2 individually. As stated above, this supplemental documentary proofwill be filed on or before September 26, 2014. In addition, the OAEP is evaluating whether to file a motion for reconsideration, on or before September 26, 2014, requesting that the Office ofHearings reconsider its determination that the OAEP failed to prove that Respondent Friendship violated 49 U.S.C. 

### § 41101.
Respectfully submitted,

BLANE A. WORKIE Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

Laura E. Jennings Senior Trial Attorney Office ofAviation Enforcement

and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590 (202) 366-0966

### 3 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY U.S. Department ofTransportation Dockets Operations, M-30 West Building, Ground Floor Room W12-10 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 ONE COPY The Honorable J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 via: Inter-Departmental Delivery Friendship Airways, Inc. dba Yellow Air Taxi, Respondent 2680 N.E. 24 Street Pompano, FL 33064 Via: CertifiedMail, Return-ReceiptRequested Email: christopher@flyyellowairtaxi.com, beth@flyyellowairtaxi.com Christopher Behnam, Respondent 2680 N.E. 24 Street Pompano, FL 33064 Via: CertifiedMail, Return-ReceiptRequested Email: christopher@flyyellowairtaxi.com, beth@flyyellowairtaxi.com Christopher Behnam, Respondent 5061 Knightswood Way Granite Bay, CA 95746 Via: CertifiedMail, Return-ReceiptRequested
#### Kayi GOUDEAGBE, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 17-1245

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: November 7, 2017

*287Jay S. Marks, LAW OFFICES OF JAY S. MARKS, LLC, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Leslie McKay, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kayi Goudeagbe, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. Gou-deagbe’s motion was untimely filed, and the Board declined to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen her proceedings.

We lack jurisdiction to review how the Board exercises its sua sponte discretion. *See Lawrence v. Lynch,*826 F.3d 198, 206-07 (4th Cir. 2016); *Mosere v. Mukasey,*652 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DISMISSED*