alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Robinson Cruise Planners Limited 

Under Contract No. N00189-07-C-Zl22 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60452 

Edward J. Kinberg, Esq. 

Widerman Malek, PL 

Melbourne, FL 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Gregory T. Allen, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been withdrawn because appellant's bankruptcy has concluded 

and, according to the parties, the debt owed to the government was discharged in the 

bankruptcy proceeding. Accordingly, pursuant to appellant's unopposed motion for 

dismissal, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket with prejudice. 

Dated: I May 2018 

TERRENCE S. HARTMAN 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60452, Appeal of Robinson Cruise 

Planners Limited, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 35.2
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QO9 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
#### Raymond J. TAHIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1684

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 20, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Brian K. Leonard, B.K. LEONARD LAW, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Norman G. Acker, Rudy E. Renter, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond J. Tahir, a former employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Tahir’s complaint alleging he was terminated because of his national origin, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e, to 2000e-17 (West 2012 *&*Supp. 2017). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Tahir v. Sessions,*No. 5:16-cv-00781-D, 2017 WL 1735158 (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately- presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
08
        11 11
        Draft Aprecia Inc. Form 10K for the year ended June 30, 2008




Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008
      (the “ **Report** ”)
      of
      Aprecia, Inc. (the “ **Company** ”)
      on as
      filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
      hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to his
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(D) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly resents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                November 12, 2008
            */s/
                Isidore Sobkowski*Isidore
                Sobkowski, President, Chief Executive
              Officer
                and Interim Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.4

ROSS MILLER
Secretary of State
254 Norht Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(776) 684 5708
Website:  secretaryofstate.biz

Certificate of Amendment
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)

                                              ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of Corporation:

OnePak, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

Article 3 is hereby deleted in its entirety and amended as follows:

Number of shares corporation is authorized to issue:
Number of common shares with par value: 100,000,000 Par Value $0.001
Number of preferred shares with par value: 100,000,000 Par Value $0.001

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 100%

4. Effective date of filing (optional): 12/21/05
(must be no later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)


5. Officer Signature (Required)  /s/ Steven Andon
                                ------------------------------
* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preferences or any
relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then
the amendment must be approved by the vote. In addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 13964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-73-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 262--Southaven, Mississippi, 
Authorization of Production Activity, Avaya, Inc. (Kitting of Audio/
Video Conferencing Equipment), Olive Branch, Mississippi

    On November 5, 2021, Avaya, Inc., submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 262, in Olive Branch, Mississippi.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 64182, November 17, 2021). On 
March 7, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
section 400.14.

    Dated: March 7, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05073 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 35.1
                   SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
               RAAC SERIES 2006-SP4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among  Residential  Asset  Mortgage  Products,  Inc., as depositor,  Residential
Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:  /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
     -------------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### Debbie COGHILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1765

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 27, 2017

Debbie Coghill, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay A. Freedman, Linda Hitt Thatcher, Wayne Bennett Wiseman, THATCHER LAW FIRM, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Ap-pellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*212Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Debbie Coghill appeals from the district court’s orders granting the Board of Education for Prince George’s County summary judgment on her claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2012), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Coghill v. Board of Educ. for Prince George’s Cty.,*No. 8:14-cv-02767-GJH, 2017 WL 1049470, 2017 WL 2779624 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2017; filed June 23, 2017 & entered June 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6753

JOHNNY WHITE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus G. L. WOODARD, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-590-5-HC-H-3) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny White, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe Delforge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Woodard , No. CA-97-590-5-HC-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification
 
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: September 9, 2010
    /s/ Charles D. KissnerName:
    Charles D. KissnerTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
TAT

Y

1021 MalN Stnnnr, Sulrs 1275

ONr Clrv CnNrnr

Housro¡r, Trxes 77002

TnLepHoNe 7 13.227 .8835

TnLscopren 7 13.227 .6205

www.wynne-law.com

April29,2015

Clerk of the Court

First Coufi of Appeals

301 Fannin Street, Room 208

Houston TX77002-2066

Attn: Jessie

CaseNo. 01-12-01087-CY;Arnold J. Webre, Jr. and Jo Kathryn Gross vs Ray Black,

Guardian of the Estate of Arnold J. Webre, Sr.; In the First Court of Appeals,

Houston, Texas

Dear Clerk:

This letter serves as notice that the Bill of Costs filed by the First Courl of Appeals on March

27,2015 contains an error with respect to the fbe assessed/paid by our tìrm in connection with the

"Clk Record" dated 1211112012 for $165.00.

Jennifer Cantu with the Probate Court electronically filed with this Court an amended

statement on April 2,2015 (Tracer #9348) correcting the price discrepancy. Attached is a copy of

the receipt from the Harris County Clerk's Office indicating the correct amount of $401.00 was paid

by our firm.

Please issue an Amended Bill of Costs to reflect the correct amount paid for the Clerk's

Record.

Very truly yours,

Re:

WYNNE & WYNNE

S AT LAW

Kenneth R.

Enclosures (as stated)

KRW:lp

i468

kwynne@wynne-law.com

ACCEPTED

01-12-01087-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/29/2015 10:37:20 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/29/2015 10:37:20 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
State of Texas

County of HarrÍs

County Auditor's Form 153

Harr¡s County, TX (rev.07111)

WYNNE & WYNNE

71"1. LOUTSTANA ST STE 2010

Stan Stanart, County Clerk

(7r3l.755-6425

Fee Officer's Official Receipt

Receipt # z LOL7295

Receipt Date : L2/77/2Ot2

FeesAssessed By : JCANTU

Cashier: CARROYO29

Notes

HOUSTON TX77002

Fee Description

County Clerk - Transcript Fee

Amount

S4o1.oo

SubTotal: $a01.00

Total: 5401.00

JenderType TenderSubType Checkü/CCAuthf Tender

Check

Remarks:

TI'YiINE & WVNNÊ ¡.I.P

2664 s401.00

TotalPaid : 5401.00

Over Payment: 50.00

ChangeDue:S0.00

OPERÀTIiIG ÂCCOUNT 2664

Ha-rris County Clerk 12t17t2012

401.00

W&W Operating Gross Estate - Clerk's Record 401.00
#### Darrel A. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. W. JACKSON, Chaplain; Foster, Treatment Program Supervisor; V. Antorn, Health Administrator, Defendants-Appellees, and J. Adams, Operations Officer; A. David Robinson, Chief of Corrections Operations; E. P. Witt, Grievance Coordinator, Defendants.

No. 17-6875

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 29, 2017

Decided: December 7, 2017

Darrel A. White, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Maughan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Ramon Rodriguez, III, RAWLS LAW GROUP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darrel A. White appeals the district court’s order* granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees in White’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *White v. Jackson,*No. 2:16-cv-00597-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. June 28, 2017). We grant White’s motion for leave to use the original record but deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

 We construe White’s informal brief as also challenging the district court’s December 22, 2016, and March 29, 2017, orders. While we conclude that we have jurisdiction to review those orders, *see Jackson v. Lightsey,*775 F.3d 170, 176-77 (4th Cir. 2014) (discussing compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 3), White has forfeited appellate review of the December 22 order, *see id.*at 177 (limiting appellate review to issues raised .in informal brief). Further, contrary to White’s apparent assertion on appeal, the March 29 order did not rule that any of his claims should be rejected for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
#### Peter K. MUKURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, Head Director of VDOC; Randall Mathena, Warden; Red Onion State Prison; David Robinson, Chief of Corrections Operation; Gerald Keith Washington, Regional Operations Chief; Jeffrey Artrip, EBP Manager Red Onion State Prison; Dual Treatment Team, Red Onion State Prison, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7371

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 2017

Decided: December 19, 2017

Peter K. Mukuria, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter K, Mukuria appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Mukuria v. Clarke,*No. 7:15-cv-00172-JPJ-RSB, 2016 WL 5396712 (W.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2016). We deny Mukuria’s motions to appoint counsel and to file an exhibit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### NUEVOLUTION A/S, Peter Birk Rasmussen, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Henrik PEDERSEN, Chemgene Holding APS, Defendants-Appellees

2015-1284

2015-1285

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 19, 2017

Jonathan Freiman, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT, argued for plaintiff-appellant Nuevolution A/S. Also represented by David R. Roth; James Bicks, Stamford, CT.

Richard'L. Beizer, Crowell *&*Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant Peter Birk Rasmussen. Also represented by Tiffany Wynn.

*908Turner Pearce Smith, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Kevin Arthur Meehan.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Newman and Linn, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 906 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 906

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to add multiple deaths as an 
aggravating factor in determining whether a sentence of death is to be 
            imposed on a defendant, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 9 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

  Mr. Bradley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to add multiple deaths as an 
aggravating factor in determining whether a sentence of death is to be 
            imposed on a defendant, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MULTIPLE DEATHS AS AGGRAVATING FACTOR.

    Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(16) Multiple deaths.--The death, or injury resulting in 
        death, of more than 1 person, occurred during the commission of 
        the crime.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 25, 2016
No. 04

- 16

- 00236

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.A. IV, ET AL., CHILDREN , From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 01

- 0021

- CVW Melissa Uram

- Degerolami, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The reporter’s record is due today, April 21, 2016

. On April 19, 2016 , the reporter filed a notification of late record, asking for an extension of time to May 10 , 2016

. The reporter is reminded that strict deadlines exist with regard to disposal of appeals dealing with termination of parental rights. With regard to the appellate record, appellate courts may not grant more than 30 days cumulatively with regard to extensio ns of time for the reporter’s record. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(b). Accordingly, we GRANT the reporter’s request, and therefore we ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before May 10 , 2016.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justi ce
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Cler k of Court
Exhibit 35 ITEM 1123 CERTIFICATION I, Amy B. Byrnes, Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that:  (1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K and of the performance of the Servicer under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, between the Servicer and the depositor (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision; and  (2)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have specified below each such failure known to me and the nature and status thereof. Date: March 21, 2017 /s/ Amy B. Byrnes Amy B. Byrnes Senior Vice President
#### WHITEPAGES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee v. Jeffrey ISAACS, Greenflight Venture Corporation, Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellants Greenflight Venture Corporation, Jeffrey Isaacs, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. True Software Scandinavia A.B., Defendant-Appellee

2016-2672

2017-1299

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 11, 2017

Bryan Alexander Kohm, Fenwick & West, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Whitepages, Inc. also represented by Ravi Ragavendra Ran-ganath; Elizabeth B. Hagan, Seattle, WA.

Ashley Nicole Moore, McKool Smith, PC, Dallas, TX, for appellee True Software Scandinavia A.B. Also represented by Warren Lipschitz, Jonathan Nathanial Powers.

Aldo Badini, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by Mulan Cui.

(Dyk, Reyna, and Wallach, Circuit1 Judges).

*614JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.