alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Robert Ashton, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: July 11, 2007 |  | /s/ / Robert Ashton                  
|                     |  | Robert Ashton                        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17363 and #17364; Kentucky Disaster Number KY-
00092]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky 
(FEMA-4643-DR), dated 02/27/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, Flooding, 
Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 12/31/2021 through 01/02/2022.

DATES: Issued on 02/27/2022.

    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/28/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/28/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/27/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Boyd, Breathitt, Carter, Christian, Clay, Floyd, 
Green, Johnson, Knott, Lawrence, Owsley, Pike, Taylor.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17363 B 
and for economic injury is 17364 0.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-04596 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7048

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COREY ELMO WELKER, Defendant - Appellant, THE ESTATE OF LORIN J. WELKER, A/K/A LORIN J. WELKER, Garnishee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CR-00-76) Submitted: November 20, 2001 Decided: December 3, 2001 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Elmo Welker, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Corey Elmo Welker appeals the district court’s orders denyinghis motion to dismiss a writ of garnishment and entering garnishment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s ordersand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Welker , No. CR-00- 76 (E.D. Va. May 30 & June 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Tony COLAGIOVANNI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CH2M HILL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-15782

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 21, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed June 28, 2017

Matthew W. Beasley, Beasley Law Group, North Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Jill Garcia, Counsel, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak *&*Stewart PC, Las Vegas, NV, Mark E. Schmidtke, Esquire, Attorney, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Valparaiso, IN, for Defendant-Appellee

*861Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and LOGAN,* District Judge.

*

The Honorable Steven Paul Logan, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the employer in plaintiffs suit alleging breach of a Business Conduct Agreement containing a provision barring retaliation for reporting misconduct.

The district court ruled on the basis of an Employee Administration Agreement, which provided that plaintiff was an employee at will and therefore could be terminated for any reason. Although we conclude the employer was also bound by the terms of the Business Conduct Agreement, this does not end the analysis. We can affirm summary judgment on the basis of any ground supported by the record. *See Crowley v. Nevada ex rel. Nevada Sec’y of State,*678 F.3d 730, 734 (9th Cir. 2012).

The issue is whether there is any triable issue of fact concerning whether the plaintiff was terminated for reporting misconduct, rather than on the basis of another, non-retaliatory reason. Under Nevada law, the plaintiff has to show not only the existence of a valid contract, but also a breach by his employer. *See Rivera v. Peri & Sons Farms, Inc.,*735 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir. 2013). We conclude there is no triable issue as to whether the employer breached. Even assuming that the more recent actions of plaintiffs co-worker, Kenneth Gilbreth, amounted to misconduct, plaintiff made no report of those actions that could have formed the basis for retaliatory termination. The employer gave a non-retaliative reason for the termination. Summary judgment was appropriate. *See Nidds v. Schindler Elevator Corp.,*113 F.3d 912, 918 (9th Cir. 1996) (affirming summary judgment where employee’s evidence was “not sufficiently probative that it would allow a reasonable factfinder to conclude either that the alleged reason for his discharge was false, or that the true reason for his discharge was a discriminatory one”). We therefore affirm.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 777 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide funding for the National 

Institutes of Health. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2015 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida (for herself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. 

TONKO, Mr. YARMUTH, and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committees on the Budget and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide funding 

for the National Institutes of Health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Investment 

5 in Health Research Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 777 IH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. 

2 (a) FUNDING.—Paragraph (1) of section 402A(a) of 

3 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 282a(a)) is 

4 amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Out of any money in the 

6 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the pur7 pose of carrying out this title, there are hereby ap8 propriated to the National Institutes of Health, to 

9 remain available until expended, the following 

10 amounts: 

11 ‘‘(A) For fiscal year 2016, 

12 $32,000,000,000. 

13 ‘‘(B) For each of fiscal years 2017 through 

14 2025, the amount appropriated under this sub15 section for the preceding fiscal year, adjusted 

16 by any percentage increase in nominal gross do17 mestic product during the preceding calendar 

18 year.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING CHANGES.—Section 402A of the 

20 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 282a) is amended— 

21 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘AU22 THORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS’’ and insert23 ing ‘‘FUNDING’’; and 

24 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘Of the 

25 amount authorized to be appropriated under subVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:31 Feb 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H777.IH H777

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 777 IH

1 section (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘Of the amount made 

2 available under subsection (a)’’. 

3 (c) EXEMPTION FROM SEQUESTRATION ORDERS.— 

4 Subparagraph (A) of section 255(g)(1) of the Balanced 

5 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 

6 U.S.C. 905(g)(1)) is amended by inserting before the item 

7 relating to ‘‘Office of Thrift Supervision’’ the following 

8 new item: 

9 ‘‘National Institutes of Health (75–9915–0–1– 

10 552).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief
Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Pure Bioscience (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|              |                                                              
|------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|June 12, 2007 | /s/ Michael L. Krall
Michael L. Krall
Chief Executive Officer
2007 MOVESRunID 2

Sum of emissionQuant Column Labels

Row Labels 2 5

3 - NOX (grams) 3 582,576,000.0 1,813,190,000.0

1 45,337,900.0 147,919,000.0

2 51,950,400.0 167,871,000.0

3 49,223,000.0 152,505,000.0

4 50,469,800.0 155,922,000.0

5 49,379,900.0 151,838,000.0

6 50,087,000.0 152,434,000.0

7 46,190,400.0 139,019,000.0

8 47,812,700.0 146,264,000.0

9 47,022,000.0 148,115,000.0

10 47,152,000.0 145,953,000.0

11 50,783,700.0 156,247,000.0

12 47,167,200.0 149,103,000.0

31 - SO2 (grams) 31 4,445,720.0 13,855,390.0

1 319,713.0 1,047,730.0

2 367,046.0 1,190,570.0

3 360,355.0 1,116,690.0

4 376,316.0 1,163,250.0

5 375,213.0 1,157,440.0

6 405,218.0 1,237,600.0

7 393,087.0 1,184,210.0

8 397,741.0 1,222,240.0

9 376,475.0 1,192,320.0

10 364,371.0 1,128,920.0

11 368,937.0 1,134,440.0

12 341,248.0 1,079,980.0

91 - Total Energy Consumption 91 1,441,722.0 4,493,295.0
110 - Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total (grams) 110 18,452,180.0 58,181,840.0

1 1,564,670.0 5,179,240.0

2 1,835,160.0 6,039,680.0

3 1,510,690.0 4,742,560.0

4 1,583,890.0 4,948,900.0

5 1,443,990.0 4,489,840.0

6 1,503,550.0 4,618,830.0

7 1,461,690.0 4,426,670.0

8 1,435,440.0 4,430,240.0

9 1,422,010.0 4,532,440.0

10 1,456,260.0 4,551,760.0

11 1,654,790.0 5,168,260.0

12 1,580,040.0 5,053,420.0

111 - Primary PM2.5 - Organic Carbon (grams) 111 6,830,547.0 21,793,700.0

112 - Primary PM2.5 - Elemental Carbon (grams) 112 11,522,520.0 36,079,150.0

115 - Primary PM2.5 - Sulfate Part. (grams) 115 99,119.4 308,983.2

116 - Primary PM2.5 - Brakewear Part. (grams) 116 1,140,369.7 3,558,298.0

1 82,903.4 272,101.0

2 95,591.9 310,300.0

3 94,793.5 293,258.0

4 99,407.7 306,831.0

5 95,870.3 296,153.0

6 101,029.0 309,595.0

7 98,230.5 296,808.0

8 96,566.0 297,984.0

9 95,017.8 301,901.0

10 94,874.7 293,816.0

11 96,938.2 297,487.0

12 89,146.7 282,064.0

117 - Primary PM2.5 - Tirewear Part. (grams) 117 312,359.4 974,657.1

1 22,708.1 74,531.6

2 26,183.7 84,994.6

3 25,965.0 80,326.5

4 27,228.9 84,044.5

5 26,259.9 81,119.8

6 27,672.9 84,801.6

7 26,906.3 81,298.9

8 26,450.4 81,621.0

9 26,026.4 82,693.8

10 25,987.2 80,479.4

11 26,552.4 81,484.8

12 24,418.2 77,260.6
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and 
Servicing Operations

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 1, 2022, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Execution of 
Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (``CONFERS'') filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Allocation.Space, 
Orlando, FL and Virgin Orbit, Long Beach, CA have been added as parties 
to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CONFERS intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 10, 2018, CONFERS filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 19, 2018 (77 FR 36292).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 2, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 26, 2021 (86 FR 67494).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-05182 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Pre- Flight Checklist 

3DR Solo with HD Camera 

Aircraft: 

1. Inspect fuselage for damage, lose screws or connections, camera 

mounts/mounts, and broken or missing pieces. 

2. Inspect blades for condition (no nicks, cracks or damage) 

3. Inspect battery- (fully charged and/or sufficient charge for the mission) 

4. Lights -Illuminated as required. 

Controller: 

Site: 

1. Inspect for condition 

2. Inspect battery charge- (fully charged or sufficient for the mission) 

3. Connection to Drone- Confirm wireless connection complete and GPS 

telemetry received and calibrations complete. 

4. Confirm connectivity to Android Interface 

5. Apps- Confirm apps to be used are loaded and active. 

1. Inspect site for condition. 

2. Ensure Takeoff and Landing sites remain clear. 

3. Inspect area for conflicts with overhead wires, buildings, trees or terrain. 

4. Confirm all areas to be flown are safe with respect to persons and/or 

property. 

5. Confirm any authorizations required for compliance with operations in 

U.S. National Airspace system obtained prior to flight. 

a. For operations in the vicinity of airports or controlled airspace 

where radio communications are required provide adequate 

handheld comm and immediately cease operations if comm is 

lost. 

6. Weather- VFR conditions or ceilings high enough to remain clear of 

clouds, winds within aircraft capabilities and no precipitation.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41184

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OLMAN ALEXI HERRERA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-227-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Olman Alexi 

Herrera-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Herrera-Martinez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41184 Document: 00513472570 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-41184

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41184 Document: 00513472570 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
Exhibit 10.12



April 1, 2002


Mr. Steve Davis

My Personal Salon, Inc.

1407 Broadway, Suite 1206

New York, NY 10018


Re: Our agreement dated April 6, 2001


Dear Steve:


This letter confirms the following:


1     The parties agree to extend the existing agreement for an additional ninety days while they negotiate the terms of a new agreement;








2     During that time REDKEN will not make any further marketing fee contributions;

3     In the event that the parties are unable to reach mutually agreeable terms for a new agreement, the extension may be terminated with one (1) weeks written notice by either party.We look forward to continuing our relationship with My Personal Salon.


Regards,


/s/ Patrick Parenty

Patrick Parenty

Vice President, General Manager
#### Robert H. WRIGHT, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John GOODRICH, Deputy, Jerald Watson, Defendant-Appellants.

No. 16-16281

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(April 12, 2017)

Craig Thomas Jones, The Orlando Firm, LLC, Decatur, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Russell A. Britt, Kenneth Drew Jones, Hall Booth Smith, PC, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WILSON and BLACK Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.

*

 Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After careful review of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. We have considered all of John Goodrich and Jerald Watson’s specifications of error, reviewing de novo the following:

> 1. Whether the district court erred in denying Watson and Goodrich qualified immunity on Robert Wright’s Fourth Amendment claim?

> 2. Whether the district court erred in in denying Watson and Goodrich official immunity on Robert Wright’s parallel state law claim?

The decision of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
	
	                                                                     Exhibit 4.3
	
	
	
	
	<PAGE>
	
	                           Grupo Elektra	 S.A. de C.V.
	
	                              List of Subsidiaries
	
	Elektrafin Comercial	 S.A. de C.V.
	Salinas y Rocha	 S.A. de C.V.
	Elektra Mexicana	 S.A. de C.V.
	Comercios Elektra	 S.A. de C.V.
	Entrega Especializada	 S.A. de C.V.
	Almacenes Especializados	 S.A. de C.V.
	Direccion Especial	 S.A. de C.V.
	Electronica del Moral	 S.A. de C.V.
	Inmuebeles Selectos	 S.A. de C.V.
	Mi Garantia Extendida	 S.A. de C.V.
	Importaciones Electronicas Ribesa	 S.A. de C.V.
	Inmuebles Ardoma	 S.A. de C.V.
	Compania Operadora de Teatros	 S.A. de C.V.
	Siglo XXI	 S.A. de C.V.
	Direccion de Administracion Central	 S.A. de C.V.
	Grupo Proasa	 S.A. de C.V.
	Grupo Mercantil Finemsa	 S.A. de C.V.
	Elmex Superior	 S.A. de C.V.
	Mercadotecnia Tezontle	 S.A. de C.V.
	Aerotraxis Metropolitanos	 S.A. de C.V.
	Sistemas de Mision Estrategica	 S.A. de C.V.
	Administrativos Empresariales	 S.A. de C.V.
	Inmobiliaria Hecali	 S.A. de C.V.
	THE ONE	 S.A. de C.V.
	The One Internet	 S.A. de C.V.
	Operadora SYR	 S.A. de C.V.
	Colchones	 S.A.
	Intra Mexicana	 S.A. de C.V.
	Elektra Transfer	 S.A. de C.V.
	Mercantil Agricola	 S.A. de C.V.
	Datacion y Supervision de Personal	 S.A. de C.V.
	Importadora y Exportadora Elektra de El Salvador	 S.A. de C.V.
	Comercializadora Elektra	 S.A. de C.V.
	Elektra
	
	<PAGE>
	
	Elektra del Peru	 S.A.
	Inmuebles Elektra	 S.A. de C.V.
	Elektra Centroamerica	 S.A. de C.V.
	Inmobiliaria Liur	 S.A. de C.V.
	Colchones Coloso	 S.A. de C.V.
	Direccion Sistematica Empresarial	 S.A. de C.V.
	Operadoras en Servicios Comerciales	 S.A. de C.V.
	Control y Direccion Administrativa	 S.A. de C.V.
	Direccion de Admimistracion en Proyectos Aplicados	 S.A. de C.V.
	Direccion de Admimistracion en Proyectos Especiales	 S.A. de C.V.
	Mediciones y Representaciones Comerciales	 S.A. de C.V.
	Gerencia Administrativas Operacionales	 S.A. de C.V.
	Bienes Raices en Promocion del Centro	 S.A. de C.V.
	Multinational Customer Services LLC
	Investment Partners III	 LLC
	Cappello Investment Partners IV	 LLC
	Cappello Investment Partners V	 LLC