alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Stephen Rade, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Stephen Rade
    ------------------------
    Stephen Rade
    Chief Executive Officer
    November 14, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14276-14277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05283]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 14277]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Multi-Component Application.
    Date: March 31, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National 
Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 827-3101, 
[email protected].

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05283 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
#### Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Debtor-Appellant, v. Thomas Patrick GORMAN, Trustee-Appellee, and Judy A. Robbins, US Trustee, Trustee. George Edward McDermott, Appellant. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Debtor, Judy A. Robbins, US Trustee; Thomas Patrick Gorman, Trustees. Janice Wolk Grenadier, a/k/a J. W. Grenadier, a/k/a Janice Grenadier, Debtor-Appellant, v. Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman, Defendant-Appellee, v. Judy A. Robbins; Thomas Patrick Gorman, Trustees. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Debtor-Appellant, v. Thomas Patrick Gorman, Trustee-Appellee, and Judy A. Robbins, US Trustee, Trustee.

No. 17-1540, No. 17-1573, No. 17-1710, No. 17-1737

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 2017

Decided: November 20, 2017

Janice Wolk Grenadier, George Edward McDermott, Appellants Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Gorman, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea L. Moseley, DIMURO-*176GINSBERG, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier and George Edward McDermott appeal the district court’s orders dismissing Grenadier’s bankruptcy appeals and denying McDer-mott’s motions to intervene and to confirm. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. *Grenadier v. Gorman,*No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 3 *&*May 5, 2017); *McDermott,*No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2017); *Grenadier v. Heckman,*No. 1:16-cv-01448-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. May 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### Earl Harrison BOND, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith MILLER, Nurse at WVDC; Joseph Florin, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 15-55321

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 21, 2017

*623Earl Harrison Bond, Jr., Pro Se

James H. Thebeau, Esquire, Deputy County Counsel, County of San Bernardi-no, San Bernardino, CA, for Defendants-Appellants

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *623See Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendants Keith Miller and Joseph Florin appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity in Bond’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutionally inadequate medical care during his pretrial detention. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. *Conner v. Heiman,*672 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir. 2012). We review de novo, and our review, is limited to issues of law. *Lee v. Gregory,*363 F.3d 931, 932 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Miller and Florin’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity because, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Bond, Bond raised a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Miller and Florin violated Bond’s constitutional right to adequate medical care, and that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violations. *See Pearson v. Callahan, 555*U.S. 223, 232, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (setting forth two-part test for qualified immunity claims); *Clement v. Gomez,*298 F.3d 898, 906 (9th Cir. 2002) (explaining that the right to be free from officers intentionally denying or delaying access to medical care was clearly established); *McGuckin v. Smith,*974 F.2d 1050, 1060 (9th Cir. 1992) (deliberate indifference may be established if a defendant “purposefully ignore[s] or fail[s] to respond to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need”), *overruled on other grounds by WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller,*104 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Timi Stephen JONES, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2460

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 8, 2017

Decided: June 20, 2017

H. Glenn Fogle, Jr., THE FOGLE LAW FIRM, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Lance L. Jolley, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timi Stephen Jones, a native and citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion by denying reconsideration. *See Urbina v. Holder,*745 F.3d 736, 741 (4th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *769the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Souce ID

Location 

type 

(U=UTM, 

L=lat/lon) X Y

UTM 

zone

Source type 

(P=point, 

A=area, 

V=volume)

Length in x 

direction - 

area sources 

(m)

D10001A1 U 729445.0000000 4237797.0000000 15 V

D10001A2 U 729505.0000000 4237762.0000000 15 V

D10001B1 U 729505.0000000 4237797.0000000 15 V

D10001B2 U 729532.0000000 4238241.0000000 15 V

D20001B U 729545.0000000 4238132.0000000 15 V

D30001 U 729532 4237968 15 P

D40004 U 729573.0000000 4238097.0000000 15 P

D40006 U 729563.0000000 4238097.0000000 15 V

D50007 U 729567.0000000 4238008.0000000 15 P

D50008 U 729602.0000000 4238043.0000000 15 P

D50011 U 729564.0000000 4237999.0000000 15 P

D20003 U 729535.0000000 4237762.0000000 15 V

D20006 U 729531.0000000 4238116.0000000 15 V
Length in y

direction - 

area sources 

(m)

Angle - 

area 

sources 

(degrees)

Horizontal 

dimension 

- volume 

sources 

(m)

Vertical 

dimension 

- volume 

sources 

(m)

Release height - 

area or volume 

sources (m) [use 

vertical center for 

volume sources]

Stack height - 

point sources 

(m)

Stack 

diameter 

- point 

sources 

(m)

Exit 

velocity - 

point 

sources 

(m/sec)

Exit 

temperature - point 

sources 

(K)

1 1 0.61

1 1 4.27

1 1 4.27

2.33 10.6 6.4

2.33 10.6 6.4

100.75 10.31 5.81 346.67

21.3 0.76 0.69 391.5

15.12 7.09 7.62

45.7 2.59 7.13 285.56

45.7 3.05 34.57 276.11

18.8 0.61 5.96 989.3

1 1 4.27

1 18 20
Elevation 

(m)

Hill Height (in 

meters) Source name
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 230 5

EDMOND MACHIE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. POLICE OFFICER TRAINER ; ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT , Defendant s - Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv - 01 146

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: February 28, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Edmond Machie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edmond Machie appeals the district court’s orders dismissing hi s civil complaint without prejudice and requiring him to file an amended complaint, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order, and denying his
motion for reconsideration. ∗ With respect to the district court’s dismi ssal orders, we have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (pleading standard); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (authorizing dismissal for failure to comply with court order); Martin v. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 248 (4th Cir. 2017) ( discussing pleading standard), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 738 (2018); Ballard v. Carlson , 882 F.2d 93, 95

- 96 (4th Cir. 1989) (reviewing Rule 41(b) dismissal for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm those orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Machie v. Trainer , No. 1:18

- cv 01146

- LMB

- IDD (E.D. Va. filed & entered Sept. 10, 2018; filed Sept. 25 & entered Sept. 26, 2018). The district court should have construed Machie’s motion for reconsideration as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, rath er than a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, as it was filed within 28 days of the entry of judgment. See Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. , 599 F.3d 403, 412 & n.11 (4th Cir. 2010); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) (providing current time limit for filing motion to alter or amend). Nevertheless, b ecause Machie’s motion failed

∗ Although Machie did not file a new or amended notice of appeal from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A), (B)(ii), we conclude that Machie’s inf ormal brief serves as the functional equivalent of a notice of appeal from that order, see Smith v. Barry , 502 U.S. 244, 248

- 49 (1992).3 to demonstrate any ground that would entitle him to relief pursuant to Rule 59(e), we conclude that the district court d id not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Wilkins v. Montgomery , 751 F.3d 214, 220 (4th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Robinson , 599 F.3d at 407 (describing grounds for Rule 59(e) relief). Accordingly, we affirm the order denying postjudgm ent relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05100]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11614]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council Notice of Meeting

    The Department of State's Overseas Schools Advisory Council will 
hold its Winter Committee Meeting on Thursday, April 7, 2022, from 9:00 
a.m. until approximately 12:00 p.m. If permitted, the members will meet 
in-person. To limit exposure, the meeting is open for the public to 
participate virtually only. If an in-person meeting is not permitted 
for the Advisory Council members due to local conditions, the meeting 
will be held exclusively online.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community on improving American-sponsored schools overseas 
that are assisted by the Department of State and attended by U.S. 
government employee dependents, and the children of employees of U.S. 
corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will address issues related to the support provided by 
the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to American-sponsored overseas 
schools. There will be a presentation on the status of the Council-
sponsored Child Protection Project and Social Emotional Learning 
Project. Also, the Regional Education Officers in the Office of 
Overseas Schools will present on the initiatives in the American-
sponsored overseas schools.
    Public members may attend the meeting virtually, subject to the 
instructions of the Chair. Those interested in participating virtually 
should RSVP prior to April 7, 2022 to: Mr. Mark Ulfers, Office of 
Overseas Schools, Department of State, Tel: 202-261-8200, Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d724b584f4e585c4e6e5e555252514e7d4e495c4958135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="206f564552534541537343484f4f4c536053544154450e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Department will send instructions for virtual participation to 
those that RSVP. Requests for reasonable accommodation should be sent 
prior to April 7. Requests sent after that date will be considered but 
may not be possible to fulfill.

Mark Ulfers,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 2022-05100 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14041-14042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Z-Wave Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 28, 2021, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. (the 
``Joint Venture'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade

[[Page 14042]]

Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Specifically, Bluesalve Partners LLC, Ashburn, VA; Shipshape 
Solutions Inc, Austin, TX; Octo Telematics SpA, Rome, ITALY; 
SoftAtHome, Colombes, FRANCE; ZWaveProducts.com, Randolph, NJ; Simon 
Holding SL, Barcelona, SPAIN; and KWSM Group, Bridgeman Downs, 
AUSTRALIA have joined as parties to the venture.
    Also, Base2 Managed It Pty Ltd, Sydney, AUSTRALIA; HAB Home 
Intelligence, North Richland Hills, TX; TIM S.p.A. (TELECOM ITALIA), 
Milano, ITALY; 3MANTECH, South Haven, MS; Automate Asia, Oxley Bizhub 2 
Sin, SINGAPORE; Aware Care Network, Plano, TX; Clare Controls LLC, 
Sarasota, FL; Intermatic Incorporated, Spring Grove, IL; Plexus 
Solutions Pty Ltd, Brighton, AUSTRALIA; Shenzhen Kaadas Intelligent 
Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Smart 
Lifestyle Solutions Pty Ltd, Pagewood, AUSTRALIA; and WeBeHome, Bromma, 
SWEDEN have withdrawn as parties to the venture.
    In addition, an existing member, Ningbo Dooya Mechanic & Electronic 
Technology Co., Ltd., Ningbo, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, name was 
spelled incorrectly on the notification filed on December 1, 2020.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and the Joint Venture intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2020, the Joint Venture filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on December 1, 2020 (85 FR 77241).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 6, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 8, 2021 (86 FR 61791).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-05107 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                                                  April 16, 2002


BY HAND

Mr. Jim Johnson
Alloy, Inc.
151 West 26th Street
New York, New York

     RE:  Lease dated as of November 2, 1996, as modified by that certain Second
          Lease Modification Agreement dated as of January 28, 2002 (Second
          Modification) between Abner Properties Company, as Owner, and Alloy
          Inc., as Tenant, covering portions of the tenth (10th) floor known as
          10th Floor Rear and 10th Floor South, and the entire rentable area of
          the eleventh (11th) floor, (collectively hereinafter referred to as
          the "demised premises") at 151 West 26th Street, NY, NY ("Building");
          the lease as modified by the Second Modification is hereinafter
          collectively referred to as the "Lease".

Dear Mr. Johnson:

     Reference is made to the above captioned Lease. This letter shall serve to
clarify and modify the Lease as follows:

     (a)  The Second Additional Commencement Date, as such term is defined in
          the Second Modification shall be deemed to be March 18, 2002.

     (b)  Subparagraph (i) of Article (1)(i) of the Second Modification shall be
          deemed deleted therefrom; and subparagraph (h) of Article (1)(i) shall
          be revised so that the words "the last day of the eighth (8th) Lease
          Year shall be deleted therefrom and replaced with the following words
          "and including February 28, 2010"; and

     (c)  The aggregate amount of the abatement as set forth in Article 2A(i) of
          the Second Modification shall be $30,000.00 in lieu of $25,000.00.

     Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms, covenants and
conditions of the Lease are and shall remain in full force and effect and are
hereby ratified and confirmed.

     Please confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning all
three (3) copies of this letter for counter-signature. Once fully executed, an
original will be returned to you for your file.

                                              Very truly yours,

                                              Abner Properties Company

                                              By: /s/  Jonathan P. Rosen
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Jonathan Rosen, General Partner

Read, acknowledged and agreed to:

Alloy, Inc.

By: /s/  James K. Johnson, Jr.
   ---------------------------------
   James K. Johnson, Jr.


                                       1