alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 8, 2016

Mr. Joshua Stephen
Joshua Stephen
2 Dutchess Court Saratoga Springs

, NY 12866

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 3445

Dear Mr. Stephen :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                  99,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  10,771
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  38,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   6,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 172,089
<PP&E>                                               0                  39,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 585,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 160,879
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     349
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 349,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 349,803
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,231                 145,636
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,941                 123,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,290                  22,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,930                  10,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,360                  12,472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,360                  12,472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21                    0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21                    0.37
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 10, 2015

NO. 03-15-00535-CV

David Rebolloso, Appellant

v.

Terry Cortez-Vega, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on August 17, 2015. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal by failing to 

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and did not comply with a notice from 

the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# EUR-Lex - 32003L0007 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003L0007

**Commission Directive 2003/7/EC of 24 January 2003 amending the conditions for authorisation of canthaxanthin in feedingstuffs in accordance with Council Directive 70/524/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 022 , 25/01/2003 P. 0028 - 0030 *

Commission Directive 2003/7/EC

of 24 January 2003

amending the conditions for authorisation of canthaxanthin in feedingstuffs in accordance with Council Directive 70/524/EEC

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1756/2002(2), and in particular Article 9r thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Under Directive 70/524/EEC the additive canthaxanthin is authorised under certain conditions.

(2) In 1997 the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) concluded the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of canthaxanthin for humans could be set at 0,03 mg/kg of body weight.

(3) In the light of the SCF's revision of the ADI, the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition (SCAN) reviewed levels of canthaxanthin in feed for salmonids, broilers and laying hens to ensure consumer safety. SCAN has stated that consumer safety would be assured by setting maximum canthaxanthin concentrations of 25 mg/kg of feed for salmonids and broilers and at 8 mg/kg of feed for laying hens.

(4) The current canthaxanthin authorisations need to be amended to provide greater protection for consumers' health.

(5) The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The conditions for authorising canthaxanthin (E 161g) in feedingstuffs are amended in accordance with the entries in the Annex to this Directive.

Article 2

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 September 2003 at the latest. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

They shall apply those provisions from 1 December 2003.

When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The procedure for making such reference shall be adopted by Member States.

Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.

Article 3

This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 265, 3.10.2002, p. 1.

ANNEX

>TABLE>
2014-2015 Federal Student Aid Application Commenters Listing

The following is a listing of the individuals or organizations that provided comments on the 2014-2015 

Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Comments were collected May 6, 2013 thru July 6, 2013. A 

summary of the comments received is provided separately.

1) Dr. Mary O'Reilly, Josephinum Academy 

2) Tina Johann, Herzing University 

3) G. Michael Johnson, Pacific University 

4) Melisa Ibanez, University of Pittsburgh at Bradford 

5) Raymond Gurrola, Central New Mexico Community College 

6) Karen Koenig-Griffin, East Central College 

7) Lynn Dubay, University of Wisconsin System 

8) Lauren Asher, The Institute for College Access and Success 

9) Cynthia Heaton, Pennsylvania State University 

10) Pamela Palermo, Northwestern Michigan College

11) Anthony Tanking, Benedictine College

12) Elizabeth Alaniz, California State University

13) Christopher Shultz, University of California, Irvine

14) Vicki Shipley, National Council of Higher Education Resources

15) Deborah Faust, Lake Superior State University

16) Jana Haile, Boston University

17) Nancy Segal, ETS

18) Tori Weigant, West Chester University

19) Susan Johnson, Wisconsin Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators 

20) Karen McCarthy, NASFAA

21) Emily Hecht-McGowan, Family Equality Council

22) Susan Degen, National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs
# EUR-Lex - 32001R1202 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R1202

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1202/2001 of 19 June 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products **

*
Official Journal L 163 , 20/06/2001 P. 0010 - 0010 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1202/2001

of 19 June 2001

amending Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 laying down special detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 as regards export licences and export refunds in the case of milk and milk products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1670/2000(2), and in particular Articles 30(1) and 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 20a of Commission Regulation (EC) No 174/1999(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2001(4), lays down the provisions applicable to the management of the milk powder quota for export to the Dominican Republic under the Memorandum of Understanding concluded between the European Community and the Dominican Republic and approved by Council Decision 98/486/EC(5). The scope of the provision on the period of validity of export licences issued under that quota should be clarified.

(2) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 20a(13) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999 is replaced by the following text: "13. Notwithstanding Article 6, export licences shall be valid from their actual day of issue within the meaning of Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 until 30 June of the quota year for which the licence application was made."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply to licences issued from 1 June 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 June 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8.

(4) OJ L 118, 27.4.2001, p. 4.

(5) OJ L 218, 6.8.1998, p. 45.
GradeB/0Step11B$8.70013.052B9.78014.673B10.68016.024B11.98017.975B13.41020.126B14.95022.437B16.61024.928B18.39027.599B20.32030.4810B22.37033.5611B24.58033...5.D..12B{29.460"'3'T5"613B35.03035.0314B41.40041.4015B48.70Q-48.70SALARYTABLE2015-GSINCORPORATINGTHE1%GENERALSCHEDULEINCREASEEFFECTIVEJANUARY2015Step2$8.9913.4910.0215.0311.0316.5512.3818.5713.8520.7815.4423.1617.1625.7419.0128.5220.9931.4923.1233.5625.4033.5630.4433.5636.2036.2042.7842.7850.3250.32HourlyBash:{B)RatesbyGradeandStepHourlyOvertime(0)RatesbyGradeandStepStep3Step4Step5Step6$9.28$9.57$9.86$10.0313.9214.3614.7915.0510.3410.6110.7311.0515.5115.9216.1016.5811.3911.7412.1012.4617.0917.6118.1518.6912.7813.1813.5813.9819.1719.7720.3720.9714.3014.7515.2015.6421.4522.1322.8023.4615.94 16.4416.9417.4423.9124.6625.4126.1617.7218.2718.8219.3826.5827.4128.2329.0719.6220.2320.8521.4629.4330.3531.2832.1921.6722.3523.0223.7032.5133.53335633.5623.8624.6125.3526.1033.5633.5633.56 33.5626.2227.0427.8628.6833.5633.5633.5633.5631.4332.4133.39 34.3733.56 33.5633.5634.3737.3738.5439.7040.8737.3738.5439.7040.8744.1645.5446.9248.3044.1645.5446.9248.3051.9453.5755.1956.8151.9453.5755.1956.81Step7$10.3215.4811.3717.0612.8119.2214.3821.5716.0924.1417.9426.9119.9329.9022.0733.1124.3833.5626.8533.5629.5033.5635.3635.3642.0442.0449.6849.6858.4458.44Step8Step9Step10$10.60$10.61$10.8815.9015.9216.3211.6812.0012.3117.5218.0018.4713.1713.5213.88I19.7620.2820.8214.7815.1815.5822.1722.7723.3716.5416.9817.4324.8125.4726.1518.4318.9319.4327.6528.4029.1520.4821.0421.5930.7231.56 32.3922.6923.3023.9133.5633.56 33.5625.0625.7326.4133.56 33.5633.5627.59 28.3429.0833.5633.5633.5630.3231.1331.9533.5633.56 33.5636.3437.3238.3036.3437.3238.3043.2144.3845.5443.2144.3845.5451.0652.4453.8251.0652.4453.8260.0661.6863.3160.0661.6863.31
# EUR-Lex - 32001R2241 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R2241

**Council Regulation (EC) No 2241/2001 of 15 November 2001 amending the autonomous common customs tariff duty for garlic falling within CN code 07032000 **

*
Official Journal L 303 , 20/11/2001 P. 0008 - 0008 *

Council Regulation (EC) No 2241/2001

of 15 November 2001

amending the autonomous common customs tariff duty for garlic falling within CN code 0703 20 00

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Argentine Republic pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, for the modification of concessions with respect to garlic provided for in Schedule CXL annexed to the GATT, was approved on behalf of the Community by Decision 2001/404/EC(1).

(2) The conditions for importing garlic have thus been amended as a result from 1 June 2001. The new system subjects imports of garlic falling within CN code 0703 20 00, outside of a GATT quota, to a customs duty comprising an ad valorem rate of 9,6 % and a specific amount, fixed at EUR 1200 per tonne net.

(3) So that the new system can completely fulfil its role, the autonomous rate of duty fixed in the common customs tariff should be increased by the same specific amount as that laid down for the out-of-quota conventional duty, with effect from 1 June 2001,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The autonomous common customs tariff duty for garlic falling within CN code 0703 20 00 shall comprise an ad valorem rate of 12 % and a specific amount of EUR 1200 per tonne net.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 June 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 2001.

For the Council

The President

M. Aelvoet

(1) OJ L 142, 29.5.2001, p. 7.
#### GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; Walter Investment Management Corporation; Best Insurors, Incorporated; Mid State Capital, L.L.C.; Mid State Trust II; Mid State Trust III; Mid State Trust IV; Mid State Trust V; Mid State Trust VI; Mid State Trust VII; Mid State Trust VIII; Mid State Trust IX; Mid State Trust X; Mid State Trust XI; Wilmington Trust Company; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2004-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2005-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Corporation 2006-1 Trust; Mid-State Capital Trust 2010-1, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Marvell DUCKSWORTH; Roslyn Ducksworth, Defendants-Appellants

No. 17-60109 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 14, 2017

Kaytie Michelle Pickett, Esq., Andrew Scott Harris, Adam Stone, Jones Walker, L.L.P., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiffs-Appel-lees

Mitchell Dee Thomas, Esq., Logan *&*Mayo, P.A., Newton, MS, Peter Emmanuel Ferraro, Ferraro Law Firm, Austin, TX, *385Jeffery P. Reynolds, Esq., Senior Attorney, Jeffery P. Reynolds, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Defendants-Appellants

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This case presents an identical issue to one we recently addressed in *Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C. v. Charles,*872 F.3d 637 (5th Cir. 2017): whether a district court’s order compelling arbitration and dismissing the case with prejudice constitutes a final appealable order when a case involving the same parties and essentially the same dispute is stayed in the district court pending arbitration. We held in *Charles*that the district court’s order was not a final appealable order, and we therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *Id.*at 639-40. We similarly DISMISS this case for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 876 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 876

   To provide that any payment to a local educational agency by the 
  Department of Defense, that is available to such agency for current 
  expenditures and used for capital expenses, shall not be considered 
 funds available to such agency for purposes of making certain Impact 
                          Aid determinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 May 26 (legislative day, May 15), 1995

 Mr. Exon (for himself and Mr. Kerrey) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that any payment to a local educational agency by the 
  Department of Defense, that is available to such agency for current 
  expenditures and used for capital expenses, shall not be considered 
 funds available to such agency for purposes of making certain Impact 
                          Aid determinations.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE REGARDING DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PAYMENTS.

    (a) 1994 Payments.--The Secretary of Education shall not consider 
any payment to a local educational agency by the Department of Defense, 
that is available to such agency for current expenditures and used for 
capital expenses, as funds available to such agency for purposes of 
making a determination for fiscal year 1994 under section 3(d)(2)(B)(i) 
of the Act of September 30, 1950 (Public Law 874, 81st Congress) (as 
such Act was in effect on September 30, 1994).
    (b) Amendment.--Clause (ii) of section 8003(f)(3)(A) of the 
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
7703(f)(3)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' before ``The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subclause:
                    ``(II) The Secretary shall not consider any payment 
                to a local educational agency by the Department of 
                Defense, that is available to such agency for current 
                expenditures and used for capital expenses, in 
                determining under subclause (I) the amount of State aid 
                per pupil received by such agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|December 12, 2006                                
|                                                 
|/s/ F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                         
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                             
|Executive Vice President -Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 CITY OF GALLUP, New Mexico, 

3 a municipal corporation,

4 Plaintiff-Appellee,

5 v. NO. A-1-CA-37247

6 PHILLIP HART,

7 Defendant-Appellant,

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY

9 Robert A. Aragon, District Judge

10 Stelzner, Winter, Warburton, Flores, Sanchez & Dawes, P.A.

11 Rebekah Anne Gallegos

12 Albuquerque, NM

13 for Appellee

14 JoHanna C. Cox

15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 VIGIL, Judge.

19 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2

1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

3 {2} DISMISSED.

4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 _______________________________

6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 ___________________________________

9 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

10 _________________________________

11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge