alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed March 5, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00388

- CR 14

- 20

- 00389

- CR

____________ THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

V.
AARON JAMES TEMPLE , Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. 1557153 , 1557664



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed June 19, 2020 . Our review has determined that a
relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the Final Judgment, signed on or about April 28, 2020

.The Harris County District Clerk is directed t o file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before March 12, 2021, containing the Final Judgment, signed on or about April 28, 2020

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted
item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Poissant and Wilson.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guillermo Chan SANCHEZ, also known as Guillermo Sanchez Chan Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-1715

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 1, 2017

Filed: November 9, 2017

Amy L. Jennings, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Guillermo Chan Sanchez, Pro Se

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Guillermo Chan Sanchez directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to immigration and drug offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), suggesting that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions). In addition, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

, The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------



                         WIRELESS XCESSORIES GROUP, INC.
                         ------------------------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "report"),
I, Ronald E. Badke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the  Company.



                                             By:  /s/  Ronald  E.  Badke
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Ronald  E.  Badke
                                             Chief  Financial  Officer
                                             November  14,  2002


                                        18
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5928 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to establish 

requirements relating to rent-to-own transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 25, 2016 

Mr. DELANEY (for himself and Mr. CARNEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 

to establish requirements relating to rent-to-own transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Rent-to5 Own Protections Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RENT-TO-OWN TRANSACTIONS. 

7 (a) DEFINITION OF RENT-TO-OWN TRANSACTION.— 

8 Section 1002(5) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act 

9 of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481(5)) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5928 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

2 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively (and con3 forming the margins accordingly); 

4 (2) in clause (ii), as so redesignated, by striking 

5 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

6 (3) by striking ‘‘means any financial product or 

7 service that is described in one or more categories 

8 under—’’ and inserting ‘‘means— 

9 ‘‘(A) any financial product or service that 

10 is described in one or more categories 

11 under—’’; and 

12 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(B) a contract in the form of a ter15 minable lease or bailment of personal property 

16 (other than a lease or bailment of a motor vehi17 cle as defined in section 1029(f)) used by a con18 sumer primarily for personal, family, or house19 hold purposes, under which— 

20 ‘‘(i) a consumer has the right of pos21 session and use of such property and has 

22 the option to renew the contract periodi23 cally by making payments specified in the 

24 contract; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5928 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) a seller agrees, in writing or oral2 ly, to transfer ownership of such property 

3 to the consumer upon the fulfillment of all 

4 obligations of the consumer under the con5 tract for that transfer.’’. 

6 (b) REGULATIONS RELATING TO RENT-TO-OWN

7 TRANSACTIONS.—Pursuant to authority granted under 

8 section 1031 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act 

9 of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5531), the Bureau of Consumer Fi10 nancial Protection shall prevent unfair, deceptive, or abu11 sive acts or practices in connection with any contract de12 scribed in section 1002(5)(B) of the Consumer Financial 

13 Protection Act of 2010 (as added by this Act) and, not 

14 later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this 

15 Act, shall issue regulations identifying methods to protect 

16 consumers from entering into such contracts. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000877

03-MAR-2015

09:10 AM
#### Norma Elizabeth XILOJ-CHAN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-1782

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: November 3, 2017

Anita Sinha, Director, Anupama Selvam, Daniel Gestal, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW CLINIC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Victor M. Lawrence, Senior Litigation Counsel, Lisa M. Arnold, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and Raymond A. JACKSON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norma Elizabeth Xiloj-Chan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s decision granting her relief in withholding-only removal proceedings. Xiloj-Chan argues that the reinstated order of removal does not bar her from also applying for asylum relief. In *Mejia v. Sessions,*866 F.3d 573, 576, 584 (4th Cir. 2017), this Court held that the reinstatement provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5) (2012), clearly precludes an alien subject to a reinstated order of removal from applying for asylum. Because Xiloj-Chan was subject to a reinstated order of removal, she was statutorily ineligible for asylum relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *281the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
EXHIBIT 23.1


                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA , LLC








                                                                  April 10, 2008


To Whom It May Concern:



The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, Certified Public Accountant, LLC hereby consents to
the inclusion of his report of March 25, 2008, accompanying the audited
financial statements of Star Financial Direct Placement, Inc., as of December
31, 2007 in the Form 10K.


Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC




        P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
             Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5873 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 511 East San Antonio Avenue in El 

Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘R.E. Thomason Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5873 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 511 East San Antonio Avenue in El Paso, 

4 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘R.E. 

5 Thomason Federal Building and United States Court6 house’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

10 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘R.E. 

12 Thomason Federal Building and United States Court13 house’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5873 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United 

Courthouse’’. Thomason Federal Building and United States nio Avenue in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘R.E. States courthouse located at 511 East San Anto-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan SAUCEDO-DURAN, also known as Juan Manuel Duran-Saucedo, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40284 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 15, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Saucedo-Duran, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Saucedo-Duran has *397moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sauce-do-Duran has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *397published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nelson Rubiel CANAR-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15854 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(April 5, 2017)

Roberta Josephina Bodnar, U.S. Attorney’s Office—FLM, Ocala, FL, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Christopher Francis Murray, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Nelson Rubiel Canar-Valencia, Pro Se

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Nelson Canar-Valencia appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to modify a defendant’s term of imprisonment if the Sentencing Commission later reduces the guidelines range for his offense. He contends that he was entitled to that reduction based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We disagree.

Amendment 782 amended the Drug Quantity Table in U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(c) by, among other things, increasing from 150 kilograms to 450 kilograms the minimum amount of cocaine for which a defendant must be responsible to qualify for a base offense level of 38. Compare U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) (2013), with U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c) (2014). This change would not have affected Canar-Valencia’s base offense level, however, because—according to the pre-sentence investigation report in his case— he was “accountable for approximately 5,268 kilograms of cocaine” (and some heroin). As a result, he is not eligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B); United States v. Jones, 548 F.3d 1366, 1368 (11th Cir. 2008).1

AFFIRMED.

1

. Because we conclude that the district court correctly denied Canar-Valencia’s motion on the merits, we do not address the government’s law of the case argument.

We also do not address Canar-Valenica’s arguments as to "safety valve" reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3553, the substantive reasonableness of his sentence, and his lack of access to certain programs available to non-alien prisoners. Those arguments have no bearing on whether he was entitled to relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Bravo, 203 F.3d 778, 782 (11th Cir. 2000) ("Section 3582(c), under which this sentencing hearing was held, does not grant to the court jurisdiction to consider extraneous resentencing issues such as this one. Bravo must instead bring such a collateral attack on his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”).
# L_2004296DE.01002701.xml

| 21.9.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 296/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 296/27

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 46/2003 der Kommission vom 10. Januar 2003 zur Änderung der Vermarktungsnormen für frisches Obst und Gemüse hinsichtlich Mischungen von frischem Obst und Gemüse unterschiedlicher Arten in einer Verkaufsverpackung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 7 vom 11. Januar 2003
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 7 vom 11. Januar 2003

Seite 61, Artikel 1 letzte Zeile:

anstatt:

„...anderer Sorten gemischt werden.“

muss es heißen:

„...anderer Arten gemischt werden.“

---
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 06, 2007

Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
11 Madison Ave
4th Floor
New York, ny 10010

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust
2006-6

Per Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 11/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function
     Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of any Servicing Function Participant, in
     all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there
     has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
     specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and
     status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers
Barry Akers
Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc.
(formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/  Andrew Eracleous
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Eracleous
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

November 25, 2009
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley C. Horton, Chief Executive Officer of Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 26, 2008



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ STANLEY C. HORTON                                                                        
|Stanley C. Horton                                                                            
|Chief Executive Officer of Sabine Pass LNG-GP, Inc., general partner of Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
pennsylvania 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

SECRETARY 

June 21, 2013 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

In accordance with Section 172 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7502, the Department of 

Environmental Protection (DEP) is submitting to EPA for approval a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) pertaining to the attainment demonstration for the 2006 fine 

particulate matter (PMz 5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the LibertyClairton PM2.5 nonattainment area. This "partial" county PMz.s nonattainment area includes the 

City of Clairton and the Glassport, Liberty, Lincoln and Port Vue boroughs in Allegheny 

County. The Liberty-Clairton PM2.5 nonattainment area was designated by EPA as a separate, 

local-source impacted nonattainment area for the 1997 and 2006 PM25 health-based standards in 

April2005 and November 2009, respectively. 

The SIP submittal includes one hard copy and one CD, consisting of the following documents: 

1) An attainment demonstration and base year inventory, analysis of reasonably 

available control measures, and a description of contingency measures that will be 

implementedto bring the area back into attainment should violations of the 2006 

PM2.s NAAQS occur after the standard is attained; 

2) Certification of public participation activities and proof of publication of public 

hearing notices; 

3) Technical appendices (appendices consisting of data files are provided in electronic 

form only); and 

4) The comment and response document. 

I certify that the electronic files are exact duplicates of the hard copies. This SIP revision is 

identified as revision 75 for the Allegheny County Health Department's (ACHD) internal 

tracking purposes. 

The ACHD is a local health agency organized under Local Health Administration Law, Act 315 

of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1304, as amended, whose powers and duties include the enforcement of 

laws relating to public health within Allegheny County. The ACHD has an air pollution control 

program that has been approved by DEP in accordance with Section 12 of the Air Pollution 

Control Act. 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 1 P.O. Box 2063 I Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 

717.787.2814 l5'z Printed on Recycled Paper Q;C/ www .depweb.state.pa. us 
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin -2-

The public comment period for the SIP revision began January 18,2013, and ended 

March 5, 2013. A public hearing was held on February 19,2013. Comments were addressed in 

a comment and response document, which is included in this submittal. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions concerning this SIP 

revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps, Director of Air Quality, by e-mail at jeepps@pa.gov or 

by telephone at 717.787.9702. You may also contactJames E. Thompson, ACHD's Air Quality 

Program Manager, by e-mail atjthompson@achd.net or by telephone at 412.578.8103. 

Sincerely, 

E. Christopher Abruzzo 

Acting Secretary 

Enclosure