alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
             RFMSI SERIES 2006-SA4 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-140421) pertaining to the 2006 Omnibus IncentiveCompensation Plan of HFF, Inc. of our report dated March 8,2007, with respect to the statement of financial condition of HFF,Inc., of our report dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of HFFHoldings, LLC and subsidiaries and of our report dated March 8, 2007, with respect to thecombined financial statements of HFF, Inc., Holliday GP Corp.,Holliday Fenolgio Fowler, L.P. and HFF Securities L.P. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of HFF, Inc. for the yearended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2006-S12 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   National City Mortgage Co., SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Wachovia Mortgage
   Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17354 and #17355; NEBRASKA Disaster Number NE-
00094]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Nebraska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Nebraska (FEMA-
4641-DR), dated 02/23/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 12/15/2021.

DATES: Issued on 02/23/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/25/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/23/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Adams, Buffalo, Burt, Cass, Cuming, Fillmore, Gage, 
Hamilton, Harlan, Jefferson, Johnson, Kearney, Nemaha, Nuckolls, Otoe, 
Pawnee, Platte, Polk, Richardson, Saline, Sarpy, Saunders, Thayer, 
Washington, Webster.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17354 B 
and for economic injury is 17355 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-04356 Filed 3-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
# EUR-Lex - 32001R0545 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R0545

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 545/2001 of 20 March 2001 amending Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms **

*
Official Journal L 081 , 21/03/2001 P. 0021 - 0021 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 545/2001

of 20 March 2001

amending Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000(2), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 46(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2786/2000(4), lays down certain detailed implementing rules on the delivery of by-products of wine-making for experiments. These rules are not sufficiently clear and their wording needs to be amended accordingly.

(2) Article 64(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 lays down certain detailed implementing rules on the storage aid for alcohol resulting from the distillation referred to in Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999. These rules are not sufficiently clear and their wording needs to be amended accordingly.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1. The second subparagraph of Article 46(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 is replaced by the following:"In the case of producers who deliver wine and by-products of their own production for supervised experiments conducted by the Member States, the provisions referred to in Articles 45, 46 and 47 shall apply and aid shall be paid to the person authorised to conduct the experiment at a rate of EUR 0,277/% vol/hl."

2. The second and third indents of the first subparagraph of Article 64(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 are replaced by the following:

"- for at least six months and at most 12 months in the period running from 1 December of the wine year concerned until 30 November of the following year.

However, for the 2000/01 wine year, secondary aid may be paid against aid applications submitted during the period running from 1 December 2000 until 30 May 2001 and for at least six months and at most 12 months."

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2.

(3) OJ L 194, 31.7.2000, p. 45.

(4) OJ L 323, 20.12.2000, p. 4.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW -2014-0598

DCN: SGE00 635 .A0 1

THE FOLLO WING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6304 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6304

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 501 North Main Street in Florence, Arizona, as the ``Adolfo `Harpo' 
                         Celaya Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

 Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Schweikert, Ms. Sinema, 
 Mr. Salmon, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Franks of Arizona, and Ms. 
   McSally) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 501 North Main Street in Florence, Arizona, as the ``Adolfo `Harpo' 
                         Celaya Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADOLFO ``HARPO'' CELAYA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 501 North Main Street in Florence, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Adolfo `Harpo' Celaya Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Adolfo 
`Harpo' Celaya Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Clinton Lee SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. K. KLEIN, Nursing Supervisor at Arizona Department of Correction; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16613

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*863Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed May 31, 2017

Clinton Lee Spencer, Pro Se

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner Clinton Lee Spencer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to effectuate service of process his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. *In re Sheehan,*253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm.

Spencer failed to challenge the district court’s dismissal of his action for failure to effectuate service of process, and has therefore waived any such challenge. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived,”); *see also Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (‘We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant .... ”).

Even if Spencer had not waived this challenge, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Spencer’s action for failure to effectuate service of process because Spencer failed to identify an address at which defendant Transue could be served, despite receiving an extension of time and being warned of the consequences of failing to do so. *See*Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (imposing 90-day time limit to effect service absent showing of good cause); *see also In re Sheehan,*253 F.3d at 512-13 (discussing good cause standard for extending time for service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)).

We do not consider Spencer’s arguments regarding the merits of his claim against Transue. because the district court dismissed the action for failure to effectuate service of process.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Christopher Eugene BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1127

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

*843Christopher Eugene Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ballantine Molony, ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Glenn G. Patton, ALSTON *&*BIRD, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appel-lee.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Buckner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *See Union Carbide Corp. v. Richards,*721 F.3d 307, 314-15 (4th Cir. 2013); *Foy v. Giant Food Inc.,*298 F.3d 284, 287-88 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Buckner v. United Parcel Serv.,*No. 5:16-cv-00644-D, 2016 WL 6477048 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard S. Jonas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: March 17, 2010
 
 /s/    HOWARD S. JONASHoward S. Jonas

Chief Executive Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50442

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 31, 2017

Benjamin Holley, Stacey H. Sullivan, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael Marks, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eric Mendoza appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 80-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mendoza contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to appreciate or acknowledge its discretion to vary from the career offender guideline based on a policy disagreement under *Kimbrough v. United States, 552*U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). We review for plain error, *see United States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude there was none.

The record reflects that the district court considered the parties’ arguments, noted its discretion to vary from the Guidelines, and imposed a substantially below-Guidelines sentence based on the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Under such circumstances, the district court did not procedurally err by failing to appreciate its discretion to vary from the Guidelines under *Kimbrough,*nor did it fail to explain adequately its exercise of discretion. *See United States v. Ayala-Nicanor,*659 F.3d 744, 752-53 (9th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Infrax Systems, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sam Talari, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

 

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: September 29, 2014

 

 

/s/ Sam Talari                        

Sam Talari,

Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1


The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-3960, 333-50621 and 333-90827) pertaining to the PowerCerv
Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-90825) pertaining to
Stock Option Agreements of our report dated July 14, 2000 relating to the
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of PowerCerv
Corporation that is included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Tampa, Florida
July 14, 2000
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 786

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 24 Corliss

Street, Providence, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Harry Kizirian Post Office

Building’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Mr. CHAFEE (for himself and Mr. PELL) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office building located

at 24 Corliss Street, Providence, Rhode Island, as the

‘‘Harry Kizirian Post Office Building’’, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HARRY KIZIRIAN POST OF4 FICE BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office building located at 24

6 Corliss Street, Providence, Rhode Island, shall be known

7 and designated as the ‘‘Harry Kizirian Post Office Build8 ing’’.
2

•S 786 IS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 record, or other paper of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harry Kizirian Post

6 Office Building’’.

Æ
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SAN JUAN LUMBER COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 20848.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 17, 1966.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Counsel, Marcel MalletPrevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Roy Kilpatrick, Canyon City, Or., for respondent.

Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Board’s petition for enforcement of its order issued against respondent on September 13, 1964, is granted. However, we do not pass upon the adequacy of the Board’s alternate ground for decision; that is, that the issuance by the employer of paychecks not covered by sufficient funds permitted the employees to disregard the grievance and no-strike provisions of the collective bargaining agreement.