alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6164 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize the use of title 

III funds for the establishment of LGBTQ resource centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Ms. ADAMS, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, 

Mr. KEATING, Mr. GRAYSON, Ms. TITUS, Ms. EDWARDS, Ms. NORTON, 

Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. AL GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Ms. LEE, Mr. POCAN, Mr. HONDA, and Mr. DESAULNIER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

the use of title III funds for the establishment of 

LGBTQ resource centers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inclusive Campuses 

5 Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6164 IH

1 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTERS. 

2 Part G of title III of the Higher Education Act of 

3 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1068 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 399A. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR LGBTQ RE6 SOURCE CENTERS. 

7 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, an 

8 institution that receives funds under this title may use a 

9 portion of such funds to establish an on-campus resource 

10 center that provides— 

11 ‘‘(1) support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, 

12 transgender, and queer students; and 

13 ‘‘(2) programming and education about such 

14 students to the entire campus community.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# L_2005166EN.01001401.xml

| 28.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 166/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 166/14

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 209/2003 of 3 February 2003 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 as regards Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural products originating in Lebanon

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 28 of 4 February 2003
  )

On page 31, in the second column, against order number 09.1178:

for:

CN code ‘
  0711 20 11
  ’,

read:

CN code ‘
  0711 20 10
  ’.

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-13-00956-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1886153

Style: Kerry Bernard Laurent

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: September 9, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Reply Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: September 10, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested: October 10, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: October 10, 2014

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of 

Date: September 16, 2014
In the Senate of the United States,

December 6, 1995.

Resolved, That the Senate agree to the amendment of

the House of Representatives to the bill (S. 790) entitled ‘‘An

Act to provide for the modification or elimination of Federal

reporting requirements’’ with the following

SENATE AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE AMENDMENT:

1 Ω1æPage 3, of the House engrossed amendment, in the

2 table of contents, strike out

øSec. 2021. Reports eliminated.¿

3 and insert:

Sec. 2021. Reports modified.

4 Ω2æPage 18, of the House engrossed amendment, strike

5 out lines 6 and 7

6 Ω3æPage 18, line 8, of the House engrossed amendment,

7 strike out ø(2)¿ and insert: (1)

8 Ω4æPage 18, line 9, of the House engrossed amendment,

9 strike out ø(3)¿ and insert: (2)

10 Ω5æPage 39, line 6, of the House engrossed amendment,

11 strike out øreports¿ and insert: report
2

S 790 EAS

1 Ω6æPage 39, line 7, of the House engrossed amendment,

2 strike out all after ‘‘936(b))’’ down to and including

3 ‘‘Code,’’ in line 8

4 Ω7æPage 43, of the House engrossed amendment, strike

5 out line 19 and all that follows over to and including line

6 2 on page 45

7 Ω8æPage 49, line 21, of the House engrossed amendment,

8 strike out øELIMINATED¿ and insert: MODIFIED

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 790

SENATE AMENDMENTS TO

HOUSE AMENDMENT
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, D.C. KING, G.G. GERDING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

EVANDER D. GUILLORY

PRIVATE FIRST CLASS (E

- 2), U.S. MARINE CORPS

N MCCA 201400273

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 14 March 2014

. Military Judge: Col P.L. Starita, USMCR

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 1st Marine

Regiment, 1st Marine Division (REIN), Camp Pendleton, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recom mendation: Maj V.G. Laratta,

USMC

. For Appellant: Maj Michael Berry, USMC R

. For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

2 1 October 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

---------------------------------------------- -----

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of HK Graphene Technology Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jianguo Xu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of November 3, 2015.  /s/ Jianguo XuName:Jianguo XuTitle:Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)  A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to HK Graphene Technology Corporation, and will be retained by HK Graphene Technology Corporation, and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Maurice HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6615

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 31, 2017

Decided: November 7, 2017

*298Craig Maurice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Donald Russell Pender, -Rudy E. Renter, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Maurice Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2012) motion and seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.* Harris makes no argument as to the denial of relief on his § 3582(c)(2) motion. Therefore, Harris has waived appellate review of that order. *See United States v. Winfield,*665 F.3d 107, 111 n.4 (4th Cir. 2012) (stating argument not raised in opening brief considered waived). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying § 3582(c)(2) relief. *United States v. Harris,*No. 5:12-cr-00120-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2017).

The district court’s order dismissing Harris’ § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal with respect to the § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.'

*AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART*

*

 Because both orders were entered on the same day and Harris’ notice of appeal does not specify which order he seeks to appeal, we look to the arguments raised in his informal brief.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.6

                           FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE USF
                         EMPLOYEES' STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

         The USF Employees' Stock Purchase Plan, as restated effective May 1,
1998 (the "Plan"), is hereby amended effective June 17, 2002 as follows:

The first sentence of Paragraph 5e. of the Plan shall be amended to read as
follows:

         e.   The maximum number of shares of Stock which shall be made
available for sale under the Plan shall be 925,000 shares.

         All other provisions of the Plan, including the remaining provisions
of Paragraph 5e., shall continue in effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, USFreightways Corporation has caused this Amendment
to be executed by its officer hereto duly authorized effective the 17th day of
June, 2002.

                                   USFreightways Corporation

                                   By:    /s/ Gerard M. Klaisle
                                       -----------------------------------
                                   Its: Senior Vice President of Human Resources
#### Danny GARCIA Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KALISHER, Dr.; et al. Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15804

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 21, 2017

*636Danny Garcia, Pro Se

Wilfred T. Fong, Esquire, AGCA—Of-fice of the Attorney General, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Danny Garcia, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Garcia failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical conditions. *See id.*at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment, medical malpractice, or negligence in diagnosing or treating a medical condition does not amount to deliberate indifference).

Contrary to Garcia’s argument that he was denied fair notice of the rules and procedures pertaining to summary judgment and an opportunity to be heard, the record shows that defendants served Garcia with concurrent notice of the requirements of summary judgment set forth in *Rand v. Rowland,*154 F.3d 952, 960-61 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Garcia’s motion to accept a supplemental brief (Docket Entry No. 14) is granted. The Clerk shall file the supplemental brief at Docket Entry No. 10. To the extent that Garcia seeks leave to supplement the record, this motion (Docket Entry No. 14) is denied.

Garcia’s other pending motions (Docket Entry Nos. 9 and 13) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Eric D. STREETER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALDEN UNIVERSITY, LLC; Laureate Education, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1004

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Eric D. Streeter, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erie D. Streeter seeks to appeal a motion filed before the Judicial Panel on Mul-tidistrict Litigation (JPML). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The filing Streeter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. In addition, this court may review orders from the JPML only when petitioned by extraordinary writ, and then only in certain circumstances not present here. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1407(e) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of V2K International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry A. Kukuchka,
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      December 24, 2008
            /s/ Jerry A. KukuchkaJerry
      A. Kukuchka, Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,162
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,745
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,087
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,558
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,378
<LOANS>                                        222,027
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,300
<DEPOSITS>                                     215,766
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,506
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 291,300
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,071
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,752
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   114
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,937
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,939
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,995
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,942
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       33
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,638
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,638
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,736
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.768
<LOANS-NON>                                        698
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   332
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,711
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,212
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       39
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,206
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,206
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief
Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Pure Bioscience (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|               |                                                              
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|March 14, 2008 | /s/ Michael L. Krall
Michael L. Krall
Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gary Brownell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PURE Bioscience.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures; and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
          of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
          such evaluation;

     c)   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: December 15, 2003

/s/ Gary Brownell
------------------
Gary Brownell, Chief Financial Officer