alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nachum
Falek, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |                          | 
| | ------------------------ | 
| | Date: June 24, 2008      | 
| |                          | 
| | /s/ Nachum Falek         | 
| |                         
| | Nachum Falek             | 
| | Vice
 President and      | 
| | Chief
 Financial Officer | 

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2007052EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/16 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey

(
[Official Journal of the European Communities L 10 of 12 January 2002](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2002_010_R_TOC)
)

On page 51, in Annex II, Point 4, second indent:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘— | honeydew and chestnut honey and blends of these except with those listed below | | not more than 0,8 mS/cm’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘— | honeydew and chestnut honey and blends of these except with those listed below | | not less than 0,8 mS/cm’. |

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**Certification
      of**


**Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer**


**of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




This
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the  report on Form
      10-QSB (the “Form 10-QSB”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Henry S. Leonard, Chief
      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer, of the Company, certify that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or
                section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB
      pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
      of
      the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.






Date:
                November 19, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/ Henry S. LeonardHenry
                S. LeonardChief
                Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer(Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance Program Fee Filing Form

Locomotives All Locomotives NR SI Nonroad Engine Spark-Ignition NR CI Nonroad Engine Compression-Ignition (excludes Locomotives, Marine and Recreational) Recreational Recreational Vehicles (except marine engines) All Marine On Highway Nonroad Manufacturer Name: 

### Certification Request Type: Manufacturer Contact Information:

Contact Name: Email Address: Phone Number: Fax Number:



### Nonroad Certification Types:

VIN(s) of the model(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas. Enter "TBD" if unknown): 

### Fee Payment Information:

Do you qualify for reduced fee?

Has a certificate been issued? 

### Family Name:

What is the total number of the vehicles, engines or units covered? What is the aggregate total retail value of the vehicles, engines or units covered? Amount Owed (U.S. Funds Only): Payment Type: Enter the check number:

Are you an Independent Commercial Importer? Model name(s) of vehicle or engine under this engine family/test group (list all that apply, separated by commas): Make of the model(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas): Year of the vehicle(s) or engine(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas): $ (optional)

$ Before paying offline please click the PDF Preview button below to print out the form. 

### Payment Details: Calendar Year: For dual U.S. / IMO Marine only, also give IMO name: Date: 01/17/2013



### Submit Data

HDE CALIF-ONLY Heavy-duty Engine California-Only Certification HDV EVAP Heavy-duty Evaporative System MOTORCYCLE On-highway Motorcycles

Component Certification for Evaporative Emmissions 

### On-Highway Certification Types: HDE LDV LDT MDPV HDV Light-duty Vehicles (Chassis Certification - California-Only) Light-duty Trucks (Chassis Certification - California-Only) Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles (Chassis Certification - California-Only) Heavy-duty Vehicles(Chassis Certification - California-Only) Light-duty Vehicles (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate) LDV LDT MDPV HDV Light-duty Trucks (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate) Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate) Heavy-duty Vehicles(Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate) Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers LD ICI MDPV ICI HDV ICI Light-duty Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers Heavy-duty Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers Heavy-duty Engine (Engine Dynamometer Certification - Federal Certificate)
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 17 - 00367 - CV MARY LEE COWDEN, APP ELLANT

V. DORIS AKERS AND CARL REX CORDELL, APPELL EE S On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. V

- 102326 - 00 - C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding 

### February 22 , 2018 ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER , JJ. Appellant, Mary Lee Cowden, and Appellees, Doris Akers and Carl Rex Cordell, filed a Joint Motion for Briefing Schedule requesting that we exte n d t he briefing deadlines until thirty days after the parties mediate on April 16, 2018. Appellant’s brief is presently due February 28, 2018 . To expedite the possible disposition of this appeal and in the interest of con servation of judicial resources, w e d eny the parties’ motion as moot and abate th e appeal . All appellate deadlines are , therefore, suspended. The case will be r emov e d from our active docket and treat ed as a closed case until April 1 9 , 201 8 , or until2

further order of this c ourt. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2, 43.6 ; Mesa Water, L.P. v. Tex. Water Dev. Bd. , No. 07 - 11 - 00153 - CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 5311, at * 2 - 3 (Tex. App. — Amarillo July 13, 2011, order) (per curiam) (doing same). The parties are directed to advise the court of the status of the mediation by April 1 9 , 2018. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**(as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of**

**the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Stephen R. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: December 10, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDTCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,309,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,367,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    556,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      41,806,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,039,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,031,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,039,431
<SALES>                                        145,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,552,790
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,540,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               349,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             872,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,533,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,533,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,533,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.04


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugo CONTRERAS-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50189

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2017 *

Filed May 11, 2017

Ryan A. Sausedo, Helen H. Hong, Nicole Ries Fox, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rebecca C. Fish, Trial Attorney, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hugo Contreras-Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment and *994challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Contreras-Hernandez contends that the district court erred when it denied his request for departures for imperfect duress under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12, lesser harm under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.11, and combination of circumstances under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(c). We do not review the procedural correctness of a district court’s decision not to depart from the Sentencing Guidelines range. *See United States v. Vasquez-Cruz,*692 F.3d 1001, 1005-08 (9th Cir. 2012). Instead, we review the ultimate sentence for substantive reasonableness. *Id.*at 1008. The low-end sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Contreras-Hernandez’s criminal history, his prior illegal reentry conviction, and his failure to be deterred by the sentence for that conviction. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). Moreover, contrary to Contreras-Hernandez’s contention, the record reflects that the district court considered his departure requests and adequately explained the sentence imposed. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*994ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 705 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 705

To amend the authorization in title 49, United States Code, for capital 
               grants for rail line relocation projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the authorization in title 49, United States Code, for capital 
               grants for rail line relocation projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rail Crossings Safety Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 20154(i) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``$350,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 
2009'' and inserting ``$100,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2016 
through 2019''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                      |   |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | /s/      W. Randall Fowler                                                                           |   |
| Name:                               | W.      Randall Fowler                                                                                    |   |
| Title:                              | Chief      Financial Officer of DEP Holdings, LLC,the      General Partner of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. |   |
|  Date:     |  March      2, 2009                                                                             |   |
#### DRAGON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, Appellant v. UNIFIED PATENTS, INC., Appellee

2016-1813

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 1, 2017

Lei Mei, Mei <& Mark LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Laurence M. Sandell.

Michael Kiklis, Obion, McClelland, Mai-er & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Lisa Mandrusiak, Christopher Ricciuti; Jonathan Rudolph Kominek Stroud, Unified Patents Inc., Washington, DC.

Before Moore, Mayer, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Stoll, Circuit Judge.

Dragon Intellectual Property appeals the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s determination that claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,930,444 are invalid. Our decision today in a related case, *Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC v. DISH Network LLC et al.,*Nos. 2016-2468, -2492, affirms the Board’s determination that claims 1-4, 7-10, 13, and 14 of the ’444 patent are invalid. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot.

DISMISSED AS MOOT

Costs

No costs.
1

Werner, Christopher

Subject: Feb. 25 Interagency call with OMB and other Federal agencies on Regional Haze Rule 

Revisions

Location: RTP-C400A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C

Start: Thu 2/25/2016 2:00 PM

End: Thu 2/25/2016 3:00 PM

Recurrence: (none)

Meeting Status: Meeting organizer

Organizer: Werner, Christopher

Required Attendees: Jones, Rhea; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, 

Paula; Greenglass, Nora; aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov; Wood, Anna; Smith, Kristi

Resources: RTP-C400A-Max40/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-C400C-Max20/RTP-Bldg-C; RTP-OAQPSC435I/RTP-OAQPS-BLDG-C

Categories: Regional Haze

Materials attached.
PowerCerv Corporation and Subsidiary

Form 10-QSB



Exhibit 32.1



POWERCERV CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of PowerCerv Corporation, a Florida corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                             
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Dated: May 20, 2004 |  | /s/ John Stanton            
|                    |  | Name: John Stanton          
|                    |  | Title: Chairman of the Board
|                    |  | (Chairman)
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                          (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

    The undersigned executive officer of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                              /s/ Bill W. Taylor
                              -------------------------------------------
                              Name: Bill W. Taylor
                              Title: Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 24, 2003


    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5803 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a temporary election 

to accelerate the American Opportunity Tax Credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2016 

Mr. HARDY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

temporary election to accelerate the American Opportunity Tax Credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extra Credit for Work5 ing Students Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCELERATED AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY TAX 

7 CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 25A(i)(2) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5803 IH

1 ‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR NUMBER OF YEARS

2 CREDIT ALLOWED.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (A) 

4 and (C) of subsection (b)(2) shall be applied by 

5 substituting ‘4’ for ‘2’. 

6 ‘‘(B) ELECTION TO ACCELERATE CRED7 IT.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an 

9 eligible student with respect to whom an 

10 election to have this section apply has not 

11 been made for any prior taxable year, a 

12 taxpayer may elect for the taxable year for 

13 subparagraph (A) not to apply with respect 

14 to such student and to apply paragraph 

15 (1) by substituting ‘$4,000’ for ‘$2,000’ in 

16 subparagraph (A) thereof and by sub17 stituting ‘$4,000 but does not exceed 

18 $8,000’ for ‘$2,000 but does not exceed 

19 $4,000’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

20 ‘‘(ii) ELECTION IRREVOCABLE.—Once 

21 made, any such election shall be irrev22 ocable and shall apply with respect to such 

23 student for all subsequent taxable years. 

24 ‘‘(iii) TERMINATION.—No election 

25 may be first made under clause (i) for any 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5803 IH

1 taxable year beginning after December 31, 

2 2022.’’. 

3 (b) STUDY.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date that 

5 is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

6 and annually for the 5 years thereafter, the Sec7 retary of the Treasury shall submit a report to Con8 gress with respect to the election under section 

9 25A(i)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

10 to accelerate the American Opportunity Tax Credit. 

11 Such report shall include details on the election rate 

12 of the option and the demographics of students so 

13 electing. 

14 (2) REPORT UPON TERMINATION.—In the last 

15 report required to be submitted under paragraph 

16 (1), the Secretary of the Treasury shall include an 

17 assessment of the effectiveness of such election at 

18 improving college completion times and the effective19 ness of the American Opportunity Tax Credit, in 

20 general, at helping students to complete college on 

21 time. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2016. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS