alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6306 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6306

 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
    numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2016

 Ms. Gabbard introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
    numerical limitations on immigrant visas and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mark Takai Filipino Veterans Family 
Unification Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT.

    Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) Aliens who--
                    ``(i) are eligible for a visa under paragraph (1) 
                or (3) of section 203(a); and
                    ``(ii) have a parent (regardless of whether the 
                parent is living or dead) who was naturalized pursuant 
                to--
                            ``(I) section 405 of the Immigration Act of 
                        1990 (Public Law 101-649; 8 U.S.C. 1440 note); 
                        or
                            ``(II) title III of the Act of October 14, 
                        1940 (54 Stat. 1137, chapter 876), as added by 
                        section 1001 of the Second War Powers Act, 1942 
                        (56 Stat. 182, chapter 199).''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 16, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 16 new standards have been initiated and 10 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​dec2021.html.*                     The following pre-standards activities associated with IEEE Industry Connections Activities were launched or renewed:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​bog/​smdc/​december2021.html.*

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 14, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 24, 2021 (86 FR 67081).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-05196 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar COUTINO-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50178

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 24, 2017

Christopher Alexander, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Benjamin Holley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Chelsea Ann Estes, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Coutino-Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24-month sentence and one-year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Coutino-Lopez contends that the government breached the parties’ plea agreement at the sentencing hearing by implicitly suggesting that it did not support the stipulated low-end Guidelines sentence or the four-level fast-track departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. We reject this argument because the record reflects that, in its sentencing summary chart and at the sentencing healing, the government stood by its recommendation that Coutino-Lopez receive the stipulated fast-track departure and a low-end Guidelines sentence. Accordingly, Coutino-Lopez received the benefit of his bargain and “the presentation of a united front to the court.” *See United States v. Alcala-Sanchez,*666 F.3d 571, 575 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotations omitted).

Coutino-Lopez next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Coutino-Lopez’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.CL 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The custodial sentence and term of supervised release are substantively reasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Coutino-Lopez’s immigration history. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K (the “Report”) of NanoViricides, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014,
the undersigned Meeta Vyas, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 29, 2014



| | /s/ Meeta Vyas                              
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Name: Meeta Vyas                            
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer,             
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JASPER WASHINGTO N , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2537

[ April 5, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Mariya Weeks , Judge; L.T. Case No. 19

- 009772CF10A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Petillo, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul P atti, III

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

P ER C URIAM

.
The Florida Supreme Court quashed our decision in Washington v. State , 293 So. 3d 1060 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020), and remanded for reconsideration in light of Morgan v. State , 350 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 2022). State v. Washington , SC20

- 671, 2023 WL 2340306 (Fla. Mar. 3, 2023).

Based on Morgan , we affirm the circuit court’s May 7, 201 9

, order rescinding the circuit court’s November 18, 2016

, order granting the defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., G ERBER and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *2 No motions for rehea ring shall be permitted

.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3 OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 20th

day of July, 2016, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ROBERT LAFAYETTE WALKER, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00128-CR; Trial Court No. 003-82609-14

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 16th day of September, 2016.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

# NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE:

STEM Education Advisory Panel (#2624).

# DATE AND TIME:

April 27, 2022; 11:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. EST.

# PLACE:

National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Virtual Meeting. No onsite Participants.

                        All visitors must register at least 48 hours before the meeting. To attend this virtual meeting in listen-in only mode, send your request to                         *stemedadvisory@nsf.gov.*                         The final meeting agenda will be posted to:                         *https://www.nsf.gov/​ehr/​advisory.jsp.*

# TYPE OF MEETING:

Open.

# CONTACT PERSON:

                        Keaven Stevenson, Directorate Administrative Coordinator, Room C11001, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 Contact Information: 703-292-8600/                        *kstevens@nsf.gov.*

# SUMMARY OF MINUTES:

                        Agenda and Minutes will be available on the STEM Education Advisory Panel website at                         *https://nsf.gov/​ehr/​STEMEdAdvisory.jsp*                         or can be obtained from Jolene Jesse, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room C11000, Alexandria, VA 22314; (703) 292-8600;                         *stemedadvisory@nsf.gov.*

# PURPOSE OF MEETING:

To provide advice to the Committee on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (CoSTEM) and to assess CoSTEM's progress.

## Agenda

    - Welcoming Remarks
    - Reflections on the Stem Strategic Plan
    - Update—Fc-Stem Interagency Working Groups
    - Meeting With Costem Leadership
    - Panel Discussion
    - Closing Remarks

Dated: March 9, 2022.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-05325 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE

         This Second Amendment to Subordinated Debenture ("Amendment") is made
and entered into as of the 5th day of February, 1999, by and between DIGITAL
TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, and SIRROM
CAPITAL CORPORATION d/b/a Tandem Capital (the "Purchaser"), a Tennessee
corporation.

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, the Purchaser and the Company have previously executed that
11.5% Subordinated Debenture due September 25, 2002, in the original principal
amount of $4,000,000, as amended by that First Amendment to Subordinated
Debenture dated as of October 21, 1998 (the "Debenture");

         WHEREAS, the Purchaser and the Company wish to further amend the
Debenture;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are acknowledged, it is agreed as follows:

         1.    The Debenture is hereby amended by deleting the third paragraph
thereof and substituting therefor the following language:

         Interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal balance of this
         Debenture at the rate often percent (10%) per annum. Interest shall be
         paid in arrears (i) on February 1, 2000, (ii) on each June 1, September
         1, December 1 and February 1 until and including February 1, 2002,
         (iii) on the first day of each month commencing March 1, 2002, and (iv)
         on the final maturity date, February 5, 2004. Monthly interest payments
         shall be accompanied by payments of principal on the first day of each
         month (i) beginning on February 1, 2002, in the amount of $55,555.55
         each, and (ii) beginning on February 1, 2003, in the amount of
         $111,111.11 each, and (iii) all remaining principal shall become due
         on February 5, 2004. All payments shall be made by automatic bank
         draft.

         2.    The Debenture remains in full effect, as amended hereby.

            [the remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]



<PAGE>   2

         Executed as of the date stated above.

                                       DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC.


                                       By: /s/
                                          --------------------------------------

                                       Title: President and CEO
                                             -----------------------------------


                                       SIRROM CAPITAL CORPORATION 
                                       d/b/a Tandem Capital


                                       By: /s/
                                          --------------------------------------

                                       Title: Vice President
                                             -----------------------------------



                                      -2-
#### CITY OF DALLAS v. ROSS.

Appeal from Dallas county.

*Municipal Corporation*— Damages—Liability *.*— -To render a municipal corporation liable for damages done to property, it must be alleged and proved that the wrongful acts complained of were committed under the direction and authority of the city; and, that such acts were within the scope of the corporate powers of the city.

*Limitation.*— In such action, the statute of limitations begins to run when such act was done and not when the injury occurs. Reversed and remanded.

Opinion by

Willson, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2011 of Ruby Creek Resources, Inc (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





ROB SLAVIKRob Slavik, President, Chief Executive Officer, DirectorDecember 14, 2011
# Asset Mapping

Site Number/Name: PH43915 McCormick Date of Site Visit: 3

- 10

- 2015 General Contractor: DSI

V1.1

# Asset Mapping Information

V1.1

# Asset Mapping Information (Cont.)

V1.1

# Asset Mapping Photo Check List

V1.1

# Tower Photos Full Site View

V1.1

# Tower Photos Alpha Antennas Alpha TMAs

V1.1

# Tower Photos Alpha TMA Alpha TMA

# Tower Photos
Beta Antennas Beta TMAs

V1.1

# Tower Photos
Beta TMA Beta TMA

# Tower Photos
Gamma Antennas Gamma TMAs

V1.1

# Tower Photos
Gamma TMA Gamma TMA

V1.1

# Tape Drop Photos Alpha Antennas RAD Center Beta Antennas RAD Center

V1.1

# Tape Drop Photos
Gamma Antennas RAD Center Delta Antennas RAD Center (if applicable)

V1.1

# Ground Photos Full view of all BTS’s

V1.1

# Ground Photos
Inside SSC SSC Available Rack Space

V1.1

# Ground Photos
Inside 3G Purcell 3G Purcell Available Rack Space

V1.1

# Ground Photos
Meter Main Breaker

V1.1

# Ground Photos PPC Rating

V1.1 PPC disconnect
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14045-14046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--R Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 2, 2022, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), R Consortium, Inc. (``R 
Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Swiss Re Management Ltd., Adliswil, Switzerland; American 
Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA; Lander Analytics, New York, 
NY; and Novo Nordisk A/S, Hovedstaden, Denmark, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, ThinkR, Aubervilliers, France, has withdrawn as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department

[[Page 14046]]

of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 9, 
2021. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72629).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-05174 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the  Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K/A of Regency Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jane C. H. Brooke, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The  Annual  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this  Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Date:   October 28, 2011
 
 
 JANE C.H. BROOKE
 Jane C. H. Brooke
 Chief Executive Officer,
 President and Director
 
 
 
 -1-