alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0493 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0493

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2002 of 19 March 2002 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 on the common organisation of the market in eggs and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat as regards the Combined Nomenclature codes of certain products **

*
Official Journal L 077 , 20/03/2002 P. 0007 - 0007 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2002

of 19 March 2002

amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 on the common organisation of the market in eggs and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat as regards the Combined Nomenclature codes of certain products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/79 of 5 February 1979 on the procedure for adjusting the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature used for agricultural products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff(3) amends the Combined Nomenclature for certain products.

(2) Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs(4), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1516/96(5), and Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat(6), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2916/95(7), should consequently be amended.

(3) The amendments should apply from the date of application of Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75, the line: ">TABLE>"

is replaced by the following: ">TABLE>"

and ">TABLE>"

Article 2

In Article 1(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75, CN codes " 0210 90 71 and 0210 90 79 " are replaced by CN codes " 0210 99 71 and 0210 99 79 ".

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply from 1 January 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 34, 9.2.1979, p. 2.

(2) OJ L 349, 31.12.1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ L 279, 23.10.2001, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49.

(5) OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p. 99.

(6) OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77.

(7) OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of FSP 50 South Tenth Street Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officer
and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









|Date: March 11, 2011 | /s/ Barbara J. Fournier                              
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     | Barbara J. Fournier                                  
|                     | Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Bernard JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10007 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(October 20, 2017)

R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, Theodore Stuart Hertzberg, Brian T. Raf-ferty, Patricia Green Rhodes, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

*909Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Brandon N. Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Bernard Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr. Johnson and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Although the brief does not satisfy the requirements of an *Anders*brief, *see, e.g., United States v. Edwards,*822 F.2d 1012, 1013 (11th Cir. 1987), our independent and plenary review of the entire record reveals that Mr. Fleming’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Mr. Fleming’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mr. Johnson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Qi Na     |
|--------|---------------|
|   |          |
|   | Name:         | Qi      Na |
|   | Title:        | Chief      Executive Officer |
|   |          |   |
|   |          | (Principal      Executive Officer) and Director |
|   |          |
|   | /s/ Zhao Ying |
|   |          |
|   | Name:         | Zhao      Ying |
|   | Title:        | Chief      Financial Officer |
|   |          |   |
|   |          | (Principal      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer) |

----
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 787

To provide an exemption from certain hazardous material transportation

regulations for small cargo tank vehicles with a capacity of not more

than 3,500 gallons that transport petroleum, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide an exemption from certain hazardous material

transportation regulations for small cargo tank vehicles

with a capacity of not more than 3,500 gallons that

transport petroleum, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazardous Materials

5 Regulatory Relief Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. SMALL CARGO TANK VEHICLE EXEMPTION.

7 The Secretary of Transportation shall exclude from

8 the application of any regulation promulgated by the Sec-
2

•S 787 IS

1 retary of Transportation pursuant to chapter 51 of title

2 49, United States Code, pertaining to the maintenance,

3 reconditioning, repair, inspection, or testing of packages,

4 or any other function having an effect on the continuing

5 qualification and use of packaging, any cargo tank vehicle

6 that—

7 (1) has a capacity of not more than 3,500 gal8 lons; and

9 (2) is used to transport petroleum products in

10 intrastate or interstate transportation within a 100

11 air-mile radius of the principal place of business of

12 the owner or lessee of the cargo tank vehicle.

Æ
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 780

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require Federal contracts

debarment for persons who violate labor relations provisions, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 9 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require Federal contracts debarment for persons who violate labor

relations provisions, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Contractor

5 Labor Relations Enforcement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEBARMENT.

7 The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151

8 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following

9 new section:
2

•S 780 IS

1 ‘‘FEDERAL CONTRACTS DEBARMENT

2 ‘‘SEC. 20. (a) Any person or entity that, with a clear

3 pattern and practice, violates the provisions of this Act

4 shall be ineligible for all Federal contracts for a period

5 of 3 years.

6 ‘‘(b) The Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regula7 tions regarding debarment provisions and procedures. The

8 regulations shall require that Federal contracting agencies

9 shall refrain from entering into further contracts, or ex10 tensions or other modifications of existing contracts, with

11 any person or entity described in subsection (a) during

12 the 3-year period immediately following a determination

13 by the Secretary of Labor that the person or entity is in

14 violation (as described in subsection (a)) of this Act.

15 ‘‘(c) A debarment may be removed, or the period of

16 debarment may be reduced, by the Secretary of Labor

17 upon the submission of an application to the Secretary of

18 Labor that is supported by documentary evidence and that

19 sets forth appropriate reasons for the granting of the de20 barment removal or reduction, including reasons such as

21 compliance with the final orders that are found to have

22 been willfully violated, a bona fide change of ownership

23 or management, or a fraud or misrepresentation of the

24 charging party.’’.

Æ
Merit Behavioral Care Corporation
1 Maynard Drive
Park Ridge, NJ 07656

Dear Sir:

     At your request,  we have read the  description  included in your Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission for the quarter
ended  March  31,  1996,  of the  facts  relating  to the  Company's  method  of
accounting for deferred  start-up costs related to new contracts or expansion of
existing contracts. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other
information  furnished to us by appropriate  officials of the Company,  that the
accounting  change  described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative  accounting
principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

     We  have  not  audited  any  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Merit
Behavioral Care Corporation and its consolidated  subsidiaries as of any date or
of any period  subsequent  to September  30, 1995.  Therefore,  we are unable to
express,  and we do not  express,  an  opinion  on the  facts  set  forth in the
above-mentioned  Form  10-Q,  on  the  related  information  furnished  to us by
officials of the Company, or on the financial  position,  results of operations,
or cash  flows  of  Merit  Behavioral  Care  Corporation  and  its  consolidated
subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to September 30, 1995.

Yours truly,




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

May 9, 1996
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with Amendment No 1 to the Annual Report of AgriSolar Solutions, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Arnold Tinter,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Arnold TinterArnold Tinter, Chief Financial Officer June 15, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX9 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following  unaffiliated parties:  Mortgage Lenders Network
USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
Order entered June 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 01495 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF DORI S L. TIPPS On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 13 - 3072 - 3 

### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s June 8, 2015 second motion for extension of time to file combined reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 8, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00456-CV

In the Matter of M.F.M.

On Appeal from the

484th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-DJV-00365

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed due to appellant’s 

inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 8, 2024
Order filed September 13, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00454

- CV

____________ DONALD YOUNG, DORIS YOUNG AND DONNA HOLC OMB , Appellant s
V.

CHRIS DI FERRANTE , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0052700



### ORDER
This appeal is from a judgment signed May 3, 2016 . Appellant s filed notice s of appeal on June 6, 2016 . Appellant s filed affidavit s of indigenc e on August 22, 2016, which this court referred to the trial court

. On September 8, 2016, the trial court notified this court that the reporter’s record had been filed and that no contest was filed to the affidavits of indige nce. “Unless a contest is timely filed, no hearing will be conducted, the affidavit’sallegations will be deemed true, and the party will be allowed to proceed without

advance payments of costs.” See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(f).
Accordingly, the Galveston Co unty District Clerk is directed to file the clerk ’s
record within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 682

To provide for the certification by the Federal Aviation Administration of

airports serving commuter air carriers, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide for the certification by the Federal Aviation Administration of airports serving commuter air carriers,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Section 44706(a)(1) of title 49, United States Code,

4 is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(1) that serves any scheduled passenger oper6 ation of an air carrier aircraft designed for more

7 than 9 passenger seats or any unscheduled pas8 senger operation of an air carrier aircraft designed

9 for more than 30 passenger seats;’’.

Æ
#### Frankie M. MILLER, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6765

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 23, 2017

Decided: November 13, 2017

Frankie M. Miller, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Christian Obenshain, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frankie M. Miller, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as time-barred and procedurally defaulted his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the *277merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Miller has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Miller’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### SOURCE SEARCH TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. KAYAK SOFTWARE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

2017-1384

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 7, 2017.

Jeffrey I. Kaplan, Kaplan, Breyer, Schwarz, LLP, Matawan, NJ, arguéd for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Daniel Basov, New York, NY.

John J. Cotter, K&L Gates LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee.

(Moore, Chen, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. Nee Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Body Central Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard L. Walters, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ RICHARD L. WALTERS Richard L. Walters Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)March 31, 2011


This
certification is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks