alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, John A. Vella, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR4 (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all materials repects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

      Dated: July 14, 2008

     /s/ John A. Vella
     Signature

     President and CEO
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 13963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05216]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-75-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 41--Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Authorization 
of Production Activity, GXO Logistics (Thermal Transfer Printers, Data 
Transmission Devices and Accessories Kitting), Kenosha, Wisconsin

    On November 8, 2021, GXO Logistics submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 41, in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 64898-64899, November 19, 
2021). On March 8, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.14.

    Dated: March 8, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05216 Filed 3-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                           10156
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   228462
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7232
<INVENTORY>                                     125793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                363534
<PP&E>                                          194692
<DEPRECIATION>                                   46090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  787393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           272864
<BONDS>                                         198836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      207756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    787393
<SALES>                                         709388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                709388
<CGS>                                           518610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   518610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  10276
<INCOME-TAX>                                      4622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudolph Emmanuel ENGLETON, Jr., a.k.a. C-Cat, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50064

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 2017 *

Filed March 21, 2017

Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kevin M. Lally, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Nathaniel Burke Walker, DOJ—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rudolph Emmanuel Engleton, Jr., Pro Se

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rudolph Emmanuel Engleton, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his 48-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Engleton’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no *642grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert M. Alderman,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This quarterly report containing the financial statements fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ML JWH
Strategic Allocation Fund L.P.


Date: November 15, 2004

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       19
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17352 and #17353; KANSAS Disaster Number KS-00149]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas (FEMA-4640-DR), dated 02/17/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Straight-line Winds. *Incident Period:*
                         12/15/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 02/17/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/18/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/17/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 02/17/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Barton, Brown, Clay, Cloud, Doniphan, Edwards, Ellis, Ellsworth, Ford, Geary, Gove, Graham, Grant, Gray, Greeley, Hamilton, Haskell, Hodgeman, Jewell, Kearny, Lane, Lincoln, Logan, Marshall, Meade, Mitchell, Morris, Morton, Nemaha, Ness, Osborne, Ottawa, Pawnee, Republic, Rice, Riley, Rooks, Rush, Russell, Saline, Scott, Sheridan, Smith, Stafford, Stanton, Stevens, 
                    ( print page 10890)
                    Sumner, Trego, Wabaunsee, Wallace, Washington, Wichita, Wyandotte. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17352 B and for economic injury is 17353 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-04040 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00240

- CR

J OSE V ALENTINE B ARRON A / K / A J OE

B ARRON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1489122D)

December 12, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By / s/ Dana Wo mack

Justice Dana Womack
# L_2016297EN.01002501.xml

| 4.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/25

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2001/470/EC of 28 May 2001 establishing a European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 174 of 27 June 2001
  )

On page 30, Article 15, paragraphs 4 and 5 are renumbered as paragraphs 3 and 4 respectively.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5986 

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 

the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2016 

Mr. CURBELO of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses 

affected by the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible 

for disaster relief. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Relief 

5 from Disease Induced Economic Hardship Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(k)(1) of the Small Busi8 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(k)(1)) is amended by inserting 

9 ‘‘, onset of transmissible diseases for which the Federal 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5986 IH

1 Government issues a public health advisory or declara2 tion,’’ after ‘‘civil disorders’’. 

3 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub4 section (a) shall apply to the onset of a transmissible dis5 ease for which the Federal Government issues a public 

6 health advisory or declaration— 

7 (1) that commences before, on, or after the date 

8 of enactment of this Act; and 

9 (2) the effects of which are experienced on or 

10 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6394 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6394

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress 
 a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Broadband Access for 
Veterans Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON PROMOTING BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE FOR 
              VETERANS.

    (a) Veteran Defined.--In this section, the term ``veteran'' has the 
meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
    (b) Report Required.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
submit to Congress a report on promoting broadband Internet access 
service for veterans, in particular low-income veterans and veterans 
residing in rural areas. In such report, the Commission shall--
            (1) examine such access and how to promote such access; and
            (2) provide findings and recommendations for Congress with 
        respect to such access and how to promote such access.
    (c) Public Notice and Opportunity To Comment.--In preparing the 
report required by subsection (b), the Commission shall provide the 
public with notice and an opportunity to comment on broadband Internet 
access service for veterans, in particular low-income veterans and 
veterans residing in rural areas, and how to promote such access.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6394

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require the Federal Communications Commission to submit to Congress 
 a report on promoting broadband Internet access service for veterans.
```
#### Gerry JOHNS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. ZAMORA, Registered Nurse, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-55623

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed November 1, 2017

Gerry Johns, Pro Se

Terry Price, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA—Office of the Attorney General (San Diego), San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerry Johns, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Johns failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant Zamora was deliberately indifferent in treating Johns’ forearm injury. *See id.*at 1057-60 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; negligence and a mere difference in medical opinion are insufficient to establish deliberate indifference); *Hallett v. Morgan,*296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir. 2002) (prisoner alleging deliberate indifference based on delay in treatment must show that delay led to further injury).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Atanacio CRUZ-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10609 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 22, 2017

Mark Tindall, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Atanacio Cruz-Rivera, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Atanacio Cruz-Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Rivera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *354the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6863

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BARKLEY GARDNER, a/k/a Big Black , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 4:95

- cr - 00041

- H

- 8 )

Submitted : February 15, 2022 Decided: March 23, 2022

Before DIAZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: G. Alan DuBois, Federal Public Defend er , Eric Joseph Brignac, Chief Appella te Attorney, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Raleigh, No rth Carolina , for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, David A. Bragdon , Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appell ee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Barkley Gardner appeals the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 13 2
Stat. 5194. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in finding that it was
not authorized to reduce Gardner’s life sentence for murder in aid of racketeering and aiding and abetting such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1959(a) (1), 2, because Gardner’s sentence was the mandatory minimum statutory sentence

. We affirm.

In United States v. Under Seal , 819 F.3d 715 (4th Cir. 2016) , we held that § 1959(a)(1) has a mandatory statutory sentence of death or life imprisonment. We stated
that “[u]nder the plain language of § 1959(a)(1), Congress has authorized two penalties

— and only two penalties

— for the crime of murder in aid of racketeeri ng: death or life imprisonment. ” Id . at 720 (internal quotation marks omitted). We also determined that a
fine is not a “stand

- alone penalty” for committing murder. Id . at 720 n.5. Rather, § 1959(a)(1) authorizes a “fine in addition to either death or life imprisonment.” Id

. (internal quotation marks omitted).
Because the district court could not consider a sentence of less than life imprisonment, we affirm the court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael SPEED, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4520

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 23, 2017

Decided: April 7, 2017

Mirriam Z. Seddiq, MIRRIAM Z. SED-DIQ, LLC, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Christine Goo, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Speed pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count each of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2012); and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2012). After Speed entered his guilty plea but before he was sentenced, the parties agreed that circumstances justified allowing Speed to withdraw and reenter the guilty plea. The district court allowed Speed to withdraw and reenter his guilty plea, and ultimately sentenced Speed to 132 months in prison. Speed now argues that the district court committed plain error when it allowed Speed to withdraw his guilty plea without first considering the factors set forth in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(d) and *United States v. Moore,*931 F.2d 245 (4th Cir. 1991). Because Speed received what he requested in the district court, i.e., the opportunity to withdraw and reenter his guilty plea, and since Speed and the Government agreed there was a “fair and just *331reason” for Speed’s original guilty plea to be vacated, we find Speed’s assertions to be meritless. Thus, we affirm the district court’s amended judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*