alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RALI Series 2006-QO9 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust
   Company Americas.


Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ---------------------
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
DISMiSS; Opinion Filed January 17, 2013.

In The

(!inirt rif Appra1

.Fift1 Hstrirt nf Jxa at Da11a

No. 05-1 2-00626-CV

ERICA MAHOP, Appellant

V.

GMAC MORTGATE, LLC, Appellee

On \ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC- 12-01 209A

OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang

Opinion by Justice Moseley

Appellant’s brief is overdue. By letter dated October 5, 2012, we notified appellant the

time to file her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file her brief and an extension motion

within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this

appeal. To date, appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of her appeal.

Accordingly vve dismiss this appeal Sec TEX R AP P 38 8 (A)( 1) 42 3(b) (c)

/

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE

I 20626F.P05
(nitrt nf Aiica1i

.fifth Jitrirt nf Irxa% at a11a

JUDGMENT

Erica Mahop, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

No. 0512-00626-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-0l209A.

()pinion delivered b Justice Moseley.

(iMAC Mortuate, LLC. Appellee Justices Francis and Lang participating.

iii accordance with this Court’s opinion of this (late, this appeal is DISM ISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee (iMAC Mortgate, LLC recover its costs of this appeal

from appellant Erica Mahop.

Judgment entered this January 17. 201 3.

/ /

/ / I

JIM MØSELE

.JUST1CE
#### Raymond Allen REDWINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. BRANCH, M.D., Physician and Surgeon, C.T.F. North Medical, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-15038

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 15, 2017 *

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

Raymond Allen Redwine, Soledad, CA, pro se

Micah Charles Edmonds Osgood, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raymond Allen Redwine, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C, § 1291. We review de novo, *Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Redwine failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to Redwine’s serious medical needs. *See id.*at 1057-58 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health; a mere difference in medical opinion is insufficient to establish deliberate indifference; a plaintiff “must show that the chosen course of treatment was medically unacceptable under the circumstances” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); *see also Roberts v. Spalding,*783 F.2d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 1986) (a prisoner has no constitutional right to outside medical care to supplement the medical care provided by the prison).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not *466presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### John J. CUNNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PATRICK COMMUNICATIONS; W. Lawrence Patrick; Susan Patrick, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-1902

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: October 26, 2017

Decided: November 22, 2017

ARGUED: Neil James Ruther, LAW OFFICES OF NEIL J. RUTHER, LLC, Towson, Maryland; Kenneth Broh Frank, KENNETH B. FRANK PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for. Appellant, Harriet Ellen Cooperman, SAUL EWING LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Brett S. Covington, SAUL EWING LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appel-lees.

Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and Loretta C. BIGGS, United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*205PER CURIAM:

John J. Cunney appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his action against Patrick Communications, LLC (“PCL”), W. Lawrence Patrick, and Susan Patrick, in which Cun-ney sought to recover commissions he claims he earned in his former capacity as a vice president and broker at PCL. Finding no error, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Cunney v. Patrick Commc’ns,*LLC, 191 F.Supp.3d 480 (D. Md. 2016); *Cunney v. Patrick Commc’ns, LLC,*No. JKB-13-2519, 2016 WL 3997289 (D. Md. July 26, 2016).

*AFFIRMED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jotham Rafael SIMMONS, a/k/a Johnathan Rashad Simmons, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7096

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 21, 2017

Decided: November 28, 2017

*290Jotham Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jotham Simmons seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently - reviewed' the record and conclude that Simmons has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### GEORGETOWN RAIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HOLLAND L.P., Defendant-Appellant

2016-2297

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 1, 2017

Dana M. Herberholz, Attorney, Christopher Cuneo, Senior Attorney, Jamie K. Ellsworth, Esq., Attorney, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Boise, ID, C. Kevin Speirs, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Daniel J. Schwartz, Kathryn Ann Feier-eisel, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Chicago, IL, Lauren J. Frank, Attorney, Timothy E. Grimsrud, Attorney, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant-Appellant

Before Reyna, Schall, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Per Curiam.

Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. The court does not believe, however, that the opinion contains confidential material.

The parties are hereby ordered to show cause, by means of a single joint response coordinated among the parties, why the opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which words, if any, are proposed to be redacted, and must specifically state the cause for each such requested redaction. If the parties propose redactions, the response to this order must also propose specific words to replace each of the proposed redactions in an unsealed opinion. The joint response shall be filed no later than August 15, 2017.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 14546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neuroimaging Technologies.
    Date: April 13, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sharon S. Low, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5104, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-237-
1487, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa96958d8989ba998988d4949392d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c60637b7f7f4c6f7f7e22626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 10, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05469 Filed 3-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IDT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard S. Jonas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: June 14, 2010
 
 /s/    HOWARD S. JONASHoward S. Jonas

Chief Executive Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to IDT Corporation and will be retained by IDT Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## SERVE D FEBRUARY 25 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIOM-p j O F[ ^ ;SPOHWIO N OFFIC EO FHEARING S ' i' ^ WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH EMATTE RO F REDO X TECH , LLC , Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09AL001 3 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2009-097 8
NOTIC EO FHEARIN G PLEAS ETAK ENOTIC Etha t th e hearin g i n thi s cas e wil l b e hel do n Marc h25 , 2010 , beginnin g at 10:0 0 a.m. , loca l tim e at

th e followin g location : Offic e o f Administrativ e Hearing s 171 1 Ne w Hop e Churc hRoa d Courtroo mC Raleigh , N C 2760 9 Allo w tim e t o pas s throug hsecurity an dnot e tha t cameras , includin g cellular telephone s incorporatin g cameras , ar e no t allowe di n federal courthouses
.

lenki n Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09AL001 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y
Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Dr
. Joh n Haselo w Redo x Tech , LL C Responden t 20 0 Quad e Driv e Gary , N C 2751 3 TEL : 919-678-014 0 FAX : 911-678-015 0 HowardL
. Martin , Jr. , Complainant' s Counse l Regional Counsel , Alaska n Regio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AAL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 Wes t 7 * Avenue , Bo x 1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-527 1 FAX : 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e in perso n o r

b y expedite dcourier , us e tiie followin g address : Federal Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
EXHIBIT 32.0

                        LAST MILE LOGISTICS GROUP, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the Annual Report of Last Mile Logistics Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Regina R. Flood, Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer), of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods indicated.



Date:  April 7, 2008                     /S/ REGINA R. FLOOD
                                         -------------------
                                         Regina R. Flood
                                         Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Victor Salerno, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc. for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Wagering, Inc.




By:

/s/  Victor Salerno

Name:       Victor Salerno

Title:          Chief Executive Officer

Date:          December 15, 2003

I, Timothy F. Lockinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc. for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Wagering, Inc.







/s/ Timothy F. Lockinger






















1
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6258 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6258

 To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
  the department in which the Coast Guard is operating to enter into 
 certain contracts for the acquisition of vessels for the Coast Guard, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2016

  Mr. Hunter (for himself and Mr. Garamendi) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 14, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
  the department in which the Coast Guard is operating to enter into 
 certain contracts for the acquisition of vessels for the Coast Guard, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coast Guard Acquisition Improvement 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. CONTRACTING AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 15 of title 14, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 578. Contracting authority
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may enter into contracts described 
in subsection (b) for the acquisition for the Coast Guard of no less 
than--
            ``(1) three heavy polar icebreakers;
            ``(2) three medium polar icebreakers;
            ``(3) four Offshore Patrol Cutters; and
            ``(4) five Fast Response Cutters.
    ``(b) Authorized Methods.--Contracts referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:
            ``(1) Block buys.
            ``(2) Leases.
            ``(3) Combined purchases, also known as economic order 
        quantity purchases, of--
                    ``(A) materials and components; and
                    ``(B) long lead time materials.
            ``(4) Advance construction funding.
            ``(5) Multiyear contracts entered into in accordance with 
        section 2306b of title 10.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 223 of the Howard Coble Coast 
Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2014 (14 U.S.C. 577 note) is 
repealed.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis at the beginning of such 
chapter is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to such 
subchapter the following:

``578. Contracting authority.''.
                                 <all>
```