alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Timothy F. Lockinger, certify that;
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
 statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
 report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
 financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
 defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
 ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
 those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
 reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the
 equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: December 15, 2003
 
 /s/    Timothy F. Lockinger
 By: Timothy F. Lockinger
 Title: Chief Financial Officer
   1
#### Lynda J. DELELLIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maude RUMPLE; Robert B. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1084

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Lynda J. DeLellis, Appellant Pro Se. Kirby Todd Phillips, HARTSELL *&*WILLIAMS, P.A., Concord, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*753PER CURIAM:

Lynda J. DeLellis appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the *Rooker-Feldman** doctrine, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because DeLellis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition of her complaint and motion, DeLellis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

*D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); *Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7080 

To reinstate pre-pandemic telework policies of Executive agencies, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Mr. CARL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To reinstate pre-pandemic telework policies of Executive 

agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Earn Your Keep Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF PRE-PANDEMIC EXECUTIVE 

6 AGENCY TELEWORK POLICIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the head of each Executive 

9 agency shall reinstate the telework policies in use by such 

10 Executive agency on December 31, 2019. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7080 IH

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Beginning on the 

2 date that the head of an Executive agency reinstates the 

3 telework policy under subsection (a), such policy shall 

4 apply in place of any other provision of a teleworking, col5 lective bargaining, or other employment agreement of such 

6 Executive agency to the extent that such other provision 

7 conflicts with the policy so reinstated. 

8 (c) REMOVAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision 

9 of law, any employee of an Executive agency who does not 

10 comply with a reinstated telework policy under subsection 

11 (a) shall be removed from the civil service, and the position 

12 formerly occupied by such employee shall be eliminated. 

13 (d) GAO STUDY.—Not later than 60 days after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

15 shall submit a report to Congress analyzing, with respect 

16 to any employee of Executive agencies who were tele17 working during the COVID–19 pandemic— 

18 (1) the rate of locality pay (if any) paid to such 

19 employee; and 

20 (2) the geographic location of the teleworking 

21 work site of the employee. 

22 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

23 (1) the term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the mean24 ing given such term in section 105 of title 5, United 

25 States Code; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 7080 IH

1 (2) the term ‘‘locality pay’’ means locality pay 

2 under section 5304 or 5304a of such title; and 

3 (3) the term ‘‘telework’’ and ‘‘teleworking’’ have 

4 the meaning given those terms in section 6501 of 

5 such title, and includes remote work. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Application of Emergency Provision Under the Antarctic 
Conservation Act

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, is 
giving notice that an emergency relating to considerations of human 
health and safety caused hazardous waste to be stored at McMurdo 
Station for more than 15 months.
    Hazardous waste in the form of batteries, biomedical waste, 
laboratory chemical waste, gas cylinders, hazardous debris, glycol, 
PCBs, petroleum-based compounds, solvents/paints/adhesives, radioactive 
material, and fuel contaminated soils and materials, with an aggregate 
of approximately 22,140 lbs. net weight, was, consistent with waste 
management best practices, segregated, packaged, and stored in a 
secured location for removal from the station.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Polly A. Penhale, Senior Advisor, 
Environment at 703-292-7420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The waste was to be removed in February 
2022, at the end of the 2021-2022 season. In January 2022, the annual 
cargo vessel sustained electrical damage on its voyage to Antarctica, 
and had to return to port in California for repairs. Due to this delay, 
the ship arrived to McMurdo Station later than anticipated, and the ice 
pier at McMurdo cracked during the off-load and on-load of material. 
This crack posed a serious safety concern for human life and the 
vessel, making further waste removal operations impossible. The removal 
of the remaining hazardous waste is a priority for removal during the 
January-February 2023 time period.

(Authority: 45 CFR 671.17)

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-04779 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6957 

To require that the President’s annual budget submission to Congress and 

any concurrent resolution on the budget include the ratio of the public 

debt to the estimated gross domestic product of the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. SMUCKER (for himself and Mr. GOLDEN of Maine) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in 

addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require that the President’s annual budget submission 

to Congress and any concurrent resolution on the budget 

include the ratio of the public debt to the estimated 

gross domestic product of the United States, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debt-to-GDP Trans5 parency and Stabilization Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6957 IH

1 SEC. 2. RATIO OF PUBLIC DEBT TO GDP INCLUDED IN 

2 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET SUBMISSION AND CON3 CURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET. 

4 (a) PRESIDENT’S BUDGET SUBMISSION.—Section 

5 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(40) the ratio of the public debt to the esti8 mated gross domestic product.’’. 

9 (b) CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET.— 

10 Section 301(a) of the Congressional Budget and Impound11 ment Control Act of 1974 is amended— 

12 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

13 end; 

14 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

15 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(8) the ratio of the public debt to the esti18 mated gross domestic product for the fiscal year be19 ginning on October 1 of such year.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,615,000              31,453,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,961,000               2,180,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,450,000              38,492,000
<PP&E>                                       5,635,000               6,191,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,256,000              65,920,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,984,000              16,636,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       111,000                 108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,685,000              22,792,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,796,000              22,900,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,904,000              26,218,000
<CGS>                                       17,493,000              15,347,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,116,000               8,582,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               651,000                 488,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             329,000                 616,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,315,000               1,585,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   552,000                 720,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   763,000                 865,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07                     .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07                     .08
        

</TABLE>
# Jornal Oficial C 19A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-1010
  doi:10.3000/19771010.CA2014.019.por |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 19A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 57.o ano22 de Janeiro de 2014 |

ISSN 1977-1010

doi:10.3000/19771010.CA2014.019.por

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 19A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

57.o ano22 de Janeiro de 2014

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avisos |
| | PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Agência Europeia de Medicamentos |
| 2014/C 019A/01 | Notificação de anulação | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

V   Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Agência Europeia de Medicamentos

2014/C 019A/01

Notificação de anulação

1

RECAPITULAÇÃO DOS JO C A CONCURSOS

Lista dos JO C A publicados no ano em curso.

Salvo indicação em contrário, os JO são publicados em todas as versões linguísticas.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |

5

6

11

19

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

V Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Agência Europeia de Medicamentos

| 22.1.2014 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 19/1

---

Notificação de anulação

(2014/C 19 A/01)

A Agência Europeia de Medicamentos decidiu anular os procedimentos das seleções seguintes:

| — | EMA/CA/S/039: Agente contratual (curto prazo), Apoio científico à Vigilância do Consumo de Agentes Antimicrobianos de Uso Veterinário (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/039: Agente contratual (curto prazo), Apoio científico à Vigilância do Consumo de Agentes Antimicrobianos de Uso Veterinário (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1),

| — | EMA/CA/S/040: Agente contratual (curto prazo), Secretariado Científico responsável pelos pareceres da Comissão Europeia em matéria de resistência antimicrobiana, Departamento de Medicamentos Veterinários (FG IV) (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/040: Agente contratual (curto prazo), Secretariado Científico responsável pelos pareceres da Comissão Europeia em matéria de resistência antimicrobiana, Departamento de Medicamentos Veterinários (FG IV) (2).

---

(1)  JO C 320 A de 6.11.2013, p. 2.

(2)  Ver nota 1.

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Edward W. Hellwig, Deceased. Catharine Osterstock, as Executrix of Edward W. Hellwig, Deceased, Appellant; Florence D. Hellwig, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

*John F. O’Ryan*and *Charles H. George*for motion.

*Thomas A. McGrath*opposed.

Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Hinkle vs. The Commonwealth.

Indictment,

[Mr. H. Marshall jr. for the plaintiff: Atto. Gen. Morehead *contra.]*

From ti-ie Circuit Court for Jefferson County.

*October*24.

Settingup agamjng table may be an entire offence; keeping a gaming table and inducing others to bet upon it, may also, constitute a distinct offence: for either, unconnected with the other, an injiictment will lie. ■Jfet when both ¿re perpetrated by the same person at the same jitne, they constitute but one of-fence, for which pne count is suf|icient, and for which but one penalty can be in Jlicted.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff having been fined five hundred dollars, on conviction, upon an indictment charging him with having *set up,*and *kept a*gaming table, and *induced*others to *bet*at it—only two questions are presented on this writ of error, prosecuted by him, to reverse the judgment: First:—whether the proof was sufficient. Second—whether offences, which *may be distinct,*being charged in the same count, the indictment is good?

We are of opinion that there is no error. *First.*The evidence was sufficient to authorize the finding, that the facts charged were true; and to justify the deduction also, that the offence charged had been committed since the date of a previous offence of a similar character, for which the plaintiff liad been before convicted. *Second.*'Although the setting up of a gaming table may alone be an indictable offence, the keeping of such table, and the inducing of any person to bet upon it, another, when each shall have been committed by different persons, or at different times; nevertheless, as they are co-operating acts, constituting altogether one of-fence, when committed by the same person, at the same time, an indictment for that *combined*act in violation of law, may properly charge the whole in one count; and but one punishment can be inflicted, *as-*for one offence.

Wherefore, the judgment must be. affirmed,
#### Amy HOLBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35552

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 28, 2017 *

Filed August 30, 2017

D. James Tree, Attorney, Tree Law Office, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Leisa Wolf, Esquire, Gerald James Hill, Assistant Regional Counsel, SSA—Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, Timothy M. Durkin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSP-— Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: D.W. NELSON, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Amy Holbrook appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Berry v. Astrue,*622 F.3d 1228, 1231 (9th Cir. 2010), and we reverse and remand.

The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed adequately to consider a Washington State decision finding Holbrook disabled approximately four months prior to her alleged Social Security disability onset date. *See*Social Security Ruling 06-03p (stating that “evidence of a disability decision by another governmental or nongovernmental agency cannot be ignored and must be considered”). The ALJ failed to provide persuasive, specific, and valid reasons for not according the Washington State decision great weight. *See Berry,*622 F.3d at 1236 (holding that a decision of another agency' is ordinarily entitled to great weight when that agency’s disability program bears a “marked similarity” to the Social Security disability program); Wash. Admin. Code § 182-512-0050 (2014) (previously codified as Wash. Admin. Code § 388-475-0050) (providing for use of the five-step Social Security analytic framework).

The ALJ’s error was not harmless because we cannot say that it was inconsequential to the ultimate nondisability determination. *See Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.,*775 F.3d 1090, 1099 (9th Cir. 2014). We therefore reverse the district court’s judgment aftd remand with *847instructions to remand to the agency for further proceedings. *See id.*at 1100-02.

Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.