alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

152) ll-K-(B)-151 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 152 of 325 
P.2 

ENERGY AND EiwmoixiMEixnAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

1655 NORTH PORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 A-83-27 

September 12, 1984) n . K<B>15 l 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #19 

Dear Robert: 

Attached are additional revisions to summary tables for Appendix J 

of the August 30, 1984 draft of the Level I Options Briefing Package for 

industrial boiler SO. NSPS. The attached tables reflect IFCAM results 

assuming (1) 0.3 lb S0_/MMBtu ceiling emission standard for residual 

fuel oil combustion in new boilers larger than 100 MMBtu/hr with annual 

capacity utilization rates larger than 30 percent, (2) minimum 50 percent S0_ emission reduction, 0.9 lb S0-/MMBtu ceiling when scrubbing and 

0.8 lb 50-/MMBtu exemption from scrubbing requirements if the new unit 

larger than 100 MMBtu/hr with an annual capacity utilization rate less 

than 30 percent burns residual fuel oil, and (3) minimum 50 percent SOemission reduction with a 0.9 lb S0_/MMBtu emissions ceiling if coal is 

burned. 

Please call me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

fi y. 

Tim Hogan \j 

TH/ce 

Enclosure s 

c c : Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
TABLE 3 

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS—NATIONAL IMPACTS 

LOW COAL PENETRATION SCENARIO 

S02 Emissions, 10 ton/yr 

Annualized Costs, IO6 $/yr 

Fuel Use, IO12 Btu/yr 

o Coal 

o Oil 

o Gas 

Cost Effectiveness, $/ton 

o Average 

o Incremental 

Base 

Case 

279 

3349 

23 

323 

152 

Coal 

Oil: 

1.7 

1.6 

181 

3370 

14 

312 

173 

205 

Coal: 1.2 

Oil: 0.8 

106 

3406 

17 

256 

226 

Coal 

Oil: 

50%-Q.9 

0.3a 

324 

479 

53l 

34661 

27t 225j 

246c 

518^ 

923c 

a « 0.3 if CU >30 percent; 0.8 if CU <30 percent. 

'Revised 9/12/84. 
TABLE 7 

NATIONAL IMPACTS OF REGULATORY ALTERNATIVES 

LOW COAL PENETRATION SCENARIO 

Baseline 

Alternative 1 

Alternative 2 

Alternative 3 

Alternative 4 

Alternative 5 

Alternative 6 

S023 (lO3 

Emissions 

ton/yr) 

279 

146 

106 

89a 

80a 

66a 

533 

Annualized Costs 

(IO6 $/yr) 

3349 

3386 

3406 

3437a 

34423 

34543 

34663 

Cost Effecti 

Average 

278 

329 

4633 

4673 

4933 

5183 

veness ($/ton) 

Incremental 

— 

500 

18243 

5563 

8573 

923a 

Fuel Use 

Coal 

23 

15 

17 

30 

30 

29 

27 

(10" 

Oil 

323 

286 

256 

232a 

2313 

228a 

2253 

Btu/Yr) 

Gas 

152 

197 

225 

236 

237 

241 

246 

'Revised 9/12/84.
[f20fconsentletter002.gif]         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of our reports dated March 24, 2010 relating to the financial statements of Play La, Inc.  We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption Experts in the Annual Report.    /s/ Jewett, Schwartz, Wolfe & Associates Hollywood, Florida April 9, 2010 Endnotes 200 South Park Road, Suite 150    Hollywood, Florida 33021    Main 954.922.5885    Fax 954.922.5957    www.jsw-cpa.com Member - American Institute of Certified Public Accountants  Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants Private Companies Practice Section of the AICPA  Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board of the SEC
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. ( the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I Stephen
Rade, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (4)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                        By /s/ Stephen Rade
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Stephen Rade
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        May 17, 2004
#### MONOPOLY HOTEL GROUP, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-16126

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(July 31, 2017)

*753Angelo Todd Merolla, Merolla *&*Gold, LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Norman M, Leon, DLA Piper LLP (US), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Monopoly Hotel Group, LLC, appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Hyatt Hotels Corporation and against its complaint of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. Monopoly entered into a licensing agreement with Hawthorn International, LLC, that permitted Monopoly to develop hotels abroad using the Hawthorn Suites brand. The chief executive officer of Hawthorn later sent Monopoly a letter stating that if Monopoly would agree to a few conditions—including allowing Hyatt to have a role in approving development projects submitted by Monopoly—then Hawthorn would alter certain terms in the licensing agreement. Monopoly agreed. Monopoly asserts that this agreement created a contract between Hyatt and Monopoly either because the chief executive officer of Hawthorn sent the letter on behalf of Hyatt or because Hyatt accepted the benefits of the contract by approving development projects submitted by Monopoly. Monopoly also asserts that it was in a fiduciary relationship with Hyatt.

This appeal presents two issues: (1) whether Hyatt and Monopoly were parties to a contract; and (2) whether Hyatt and Monopoly were in a fiduciary relationship. Monopoly presents no evidence that warrants a reasonable inference that Hyatt was a party to a contract with Monopoly, nor does Monopoly offer any evidence that Hyatt had a fiduciary duty to Monopoly. For these reasons and the reasons stated in the well-reasoned order of the district court dated August 16, 2016, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Hyatt.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6677 

To amend the National Levee Safety Act of 2007 to include in the definition 

of levee hard or manmade structures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself and Mr. MOULTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the National Levee Safety Act of 2007 to include 

in the definition of levee hard or manmade structures, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seawall Expansion 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF LEVEE. 

7 Section 9002(7) of the National Levee Safety Act of 

8 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3301) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), in the matter pre10 ceding clause (i)— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6677 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘manmade barrier’’ and in2 serting ‘‘hard or manmade structure or bar3 rier’’; 

4 (B) by inserting ‘‘, seawall, revetment, 

5 bulkhead, groin, jetty, breakwater, dike, levee’’ 

6 after ‘‘floodwall’’; and 

7 (C) by inserting ‘‘or soft infrastructure (in8 cluding a beach, dune, or coastal bank)’’ after 

9 ‘‘other structure)’’; and 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

11 (A) in clause (iii), by inserting ‘‘or’’ after 

12 the semicolon; 

13 (B) in clause (iv)(V), by striking ‘‘; or’’ 

14 and inserting a period; and 

15 (C) by striking clause (v). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  CytoGenix,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 1O-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Randy
Moseley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)The  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

September 19, 2008


/s/ Randy Moseley
-----------------
Randy Moseley
Interim Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.8

TOYS R US HOLDINGS, INC.

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION

Date:

Grant to:



---

the right to purchase from Toys R Us Holdings, Inc. (the Company):

shares of its Class A Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share, at a price of $0.2972

per share; and

shares of its Class L Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $24.0752

per share.

The foregoing options are Options as such term is defined in the Companys 2005 Management Incentive Plan (as amended, the Plan), and are subject to all of the terms and conditions
of the Plan in effect from time to time.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or Article II of the Plan, with respect to this Award
Competing Business for purposes of the Plan shall mean a Competitive Business as defined in Section 8(a)(i)(A) of the employment agreement entered into as of
 between the undersigned
and Toys R Us, Inc. (the Employment Agreement).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the undersigned
resigns with Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement), then such resignation shall be treated, for purposes of Article IX of the Plan, as if the undersigned had been terminated without Cause on the date of the undersigneds
resignation.

[Notwithstanding the foregoing or Section 10.6 of the Plan, the put rights set forth in Article X of the Plan shall be
applicable to this Award in accordance with the terms thereof.]

The start date for the accrual of yield on the shares of Class L
Common Stock subject to this Option shall be the date hereof.

This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts (including by
means of telecopied signature pages), all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, acting by and through its duly authorized officers, has caused this
agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.



TOYS R US HOLDINGS, INC.By:Name: Its:Accepted and Agreed:<NAME>




2
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7065 

To include water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of 

the Corps of Engineers in planning, designing, constructing, modifying, 

operating, and maintaining water resources development projects, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2024 

Mrs. NAPOLITANO (for herself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To include water supply and water conservation as a primary 

mission of the Corps of Engineers in planning, designing, 

constructing, modifying, operating, and maintaining 

water resources development projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Priority for Water 

5 Supply and Conservation Act of 2024’’. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7065 IH

1 SEC. 2. WATER SUPPLY AND WATER CONSERVATION MIS2 SION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army, acting 

4 through the Chief of Engineers, shall include water supply 

5 and water conservation as a primary mission of the Corps 

6 of Engineers in planning, designing, constructing, modi7 fying, operating, and maintaining water resources develop8 ment projects. 

9 (b) LIMITATION.—Nothing in this section affects— 

10 (1) existing Corps of Engineers’ authorities, in11 cluding its authorities with respect to navigation, 

12 flood control, and environmental protection and res13 toration; 

14 (2) pending Corps of Engineers permit applica15 tions or pending lawsuits involving permits or water 

16 resources projects; 

17 (3) the application of public interest review pro18 cedures for Corps of Engineers permits; or 

19 (4) any authority of a State to manage, use, or 

20 allocate the water resources of that State. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0182 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0182

**2001/182/EC: Commission decision of 8 March 2001 repealing Decision 93/351/EEC determining analysis methods, sampling plans and maximum limits for mercury in fishery products (Text with EEA relevance.)(notified under document number C(2001) 672) **

*
Official Journal L 077 , 16/03/2001 P. 0022 - 0023 *

Commission decision

of 8 March 2001

repealing Decision 93/351/EEC determining analysis methods, sampling plans and maximum limits for mercury in fishery products

(notified under document number C(2001) 672)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/182/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of fishery products(1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC(2) and in particular chapter V, part II, point 3.C of the Annex thereto.

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 466/2000(3) provides for the setting of maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs in order to protect public health and, for reasons of transparency, maximum limits for concentrations of mercury in fishery products intended for human consumption covered by Decision 93/351/EEC(4)have been integrated in that Regulation. It follows that Decision 93/351/EEC should be repealed.

(2) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 93/351/EEC is repealed with effect from 5 April 2002.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1997, p. 31.

(3) See page 1 of this Official Journal.

(4) OJ L 144, 16.6.1993, p. 236.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John N. Hatsopoulos, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAmerican DG Energy Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a.               All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 18, 2008 |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| /s/ John  N. Hatsopoulos   |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer   |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of recharter.

# SUMMARY:

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972, that the Lead Exposure and Prevention Advisory Committee (LEPAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through January 17, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Paul Allwood, Ph.D., MPH, RS, Designated Federal Officer, Branch Chief, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, telephone (770) 488-6774;                         *PAllwood@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-03865 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a -14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications I, John A. Vella, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 1 0-K and all reports on Form 1 0-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Prime Mortgage Trust 2006-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 1 0-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic report;  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer (s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review (s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement (s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer (s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement (s) and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset- backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 1 3a- 18 and 1 5d- 18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services Inc, Assurant, Inc and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as Servicer and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee.  March 14, 2007  /s/John Vella  President & CEO
EXHIBIT 23.3


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
333-114496  and  333-121039 on Form S-3, and Nos.  333-105974,  333-116014,  and
333-122716  on Form S-8 of our report,  dated March 15, 2005,  appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gasco Energy, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2004.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 15, 2005