Ex 34 a) [Ernst & Young logo] Ernst & Young LLP Suite 3300 Phone: (720) 931-4000 370 17th Street Fax:  (720) 931-4444 Denver, Colorado 80202-5663 **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform**Board of Directors Aurora Loan Services LLC We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying  Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan master servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(l)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Master Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 Master Servic ing Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP March 13, 2007 Ex 34 b) [ERNST& YOUNG LOGO] ERNST& YOUNG LLP  Phone: (720) 9314000  Suite 3000  Fax: (720) 931-4444 370 17th Street  Denver, Colorado 80202-5663  **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform**Board of Directors  Aurora Loan Services LLC  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Management Certification"), that Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Certification, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1 122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1 122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the Interpretation 17.06 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. As described in management's assertion, for servicing criteria 1 122(d)(2)(i), 1 122(d)(4)(iv), 1 122(d)(4)(vii), 1 122(d)(4)(xi) and 1 122(d)(4)(xii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06. As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned  applicable servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1 122(d)(2)(i), 1 122(d)(4)(iv),  1 122(d)(4)(vii), 1122 (d)(4)(xi) and 1 122(d)(4)(xii) for which compliance is determined based on  Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the  Regulation AB 1122 Servicing Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLP March 13, 2007 Ex 34 c) [KPMG LOGO] KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago. IL 60801-5212********Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors  The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Ame ricas (collectively the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), I 122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  As described in management's assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I, for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC  Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (`Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria1 including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois  February 28, 2007 Ex 34 d) [KPMG LOGO] KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive Chicago. IL 60801-5212********Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors  The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), I 122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,2006. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  As described in management's assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I, for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item  1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations (`Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria1 including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ KPMG LLP Chicago, Illinois  February 28, 2007 Ex 34 e) PriceWaterhouseCoopers PriceWaterhouseCoopers Suite 1800 2001 Ross Ave. Dallas, TX 75201-2997 Telephone:  214-999-1400 Facsimile:  214-754-7991 www.pwc.com **Report of Independcnt Registered Public Accounting Firm******To the Board of Directors of The First American Corporation:  We have examined First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L. P.'s (the `Company" and an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation), compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item I1(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for an loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company salved as the residential tax service provider (the Platform) described In the accompanying Report on 4ssessment or Compliance, as of December 3l, 2006 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d )(l)(1-(iii), 1122(d)(2i)-{iv), 1122(d)(3)(i-iv), ll22(d)(4)(I)-(x) and 1122(d)(4)(x)-(xv), wh ich the Comp any has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by It with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion On the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria  based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United Stales) and accordingly, included examining, on a fest basis, evidence about The Company's comp liance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determin ing whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not des igned to detect noncomp liance arising from errors that nay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our examination disclosed The following material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(2)(v ii)(B) of Regulation AB applicable to the company during year ended December 31, 2006. Account reconciliations for all asset-backed securities related bank accounts were not prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified In the transaction agreements as required by item  1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of Regulation AB. In our opinion except for the material Instance of noncompliance described In the preceding paragraph, First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, LP. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended Oecemberal,2006 for all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential tax service provider, in all material respects.  /s/  PriceWaterhouseCoopers February 28,2007  Ex 34 f) Ernst & Young LOGO                                                       Ernst &Young LLP                             Phone: (213) 977-3200                                                                                             725 South Figueroa Street                    www.ey.com                                                                                              Los Angeles, California 90017-5418  **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm****Regulation AB Item 1122 SFR Servicing Platform******The Board of Directors and Shareholder  Indymac Bank, F.S.B.  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (the "Management Assertion"), that Indymac Bank, F.S.B. (the "Bank"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Indymac Bancorp, Inc., complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the single family residential ("SFR") mortgage loan servicing compliance platform (the "Regulation AB Item 1122 SFR Servicing Platform"), as defined in the Management Assertion, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(cl)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Bank has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Regulation AB Item 1122 SFR Servicing Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Regulation AB Item 1122 SFR Servicing Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Regulation AB Item 1122 SFR Servicing Platform, and determining whether the Bank processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the Interpretation 17.06 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Bank during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  As described in the Management's Assertion, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), the Bank has engaged various vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. The Bank has determined that these vendors are not considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Bank has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06. As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Bank has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply, in all material respects, with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Bank is solely responsible for determining that it meets the Securities and Exchange Commission requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in the Management Assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Bank's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), for which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Regulation AB 1122 SFR Servicing Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP March 16, 2007  Ex 34 g) **Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management's Assertion on Compliance with Item 1122 Criteria, that  LaSalle Bank National Association ("LBNA" or "the Company"), a wholly owned subsidiary of LaSalle Bank Corporation, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB  for all new Asset Backed Securities, Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities and Residential Mortgage Backed Securities securitization trust transactions subsequent to January 1, 2006, to the extent subject to Regulation AB for which LBNA  is trustee ("the Platform"), as of and for the  year ended December 31, 2006, except for****those criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this report. See  Exhibit  A of management's assertion for a list of servicing criteria determined by the Company to be applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the Platform.  As indicated in the Management's Assertion on Compliance with Item 1122 Criteria, management's assertion for servicing criteria 1122(d)(3)(i)(A) and (B) covers only the information in reports to investors that is specifically required by the respective transaction agreements, and not to any additional information included in reports to investors that is not required by the respective transaction agreements.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria listed in Exhibit A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual mortgage transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. ****In our opinion,  management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.  ********/s/ Ernst & Young LLP  February 28, 2007 Ex 34 h) [KPMG LOGO] KPMG LLP  Suite 2000  355 South Grand Avenue  Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors  Newport Management Corporation: We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Newport Management Corporation (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for pools of loans, underlying publicly issued residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1, 2006 by Aurora Loan Services, LLC, on which escrow payments were disbursed in 2006 (the Platform), specifically Item 1 122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates to: (1) processing the obligor's hazard insurance information the Company receives; (2) providing Aurora Loan Services, LLC with the applicable hazard insurance effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, Insurance Information); (3) providing the Insurance Information to Aurora Loan Services, LLC no later than 5 days prior to the applicable  expiration date as indicated in the Insurance Information; and (4) disbursing escrowed insurance payments to insurance carriers on or before the applicable expiration date, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that no other servicing criteria are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Schedule A to the Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria lists the individual loans identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ KPMG LLP Los Angeles, California  February 28, 2007 Ex 34 i) [KPMG LOGO] KPMG LLP Suite 2000 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568 ******Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Directors Newport Management Corporation: We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Newport Management Corporation (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for pools of loans, underlying publicly issued residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1, 2006 by IndyMac Bank, on which escrow payments were disbursed in 2006 (the Platform), specifically Item 1122(d)(4)(xi), only as it relates to processing the obligor's hazard insurance information the Company receives, providing IndyMac Bank with the applicable hazard insurance effective date, payment amount, and payee (collectively, Insurance Information), and providing the Insurance Information to IndyMac Bank no later than 5 days prior to the applicable expiration dates as indicated in the Insurance Information, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has determined that no other servicing criteria are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Schedule A to the Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria lists the individual loans identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the Company's comp liance based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermo re, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ KPMG LLP Los Angeles, California February 27, 2007 Ex 34 j) [Ernst & Young LLP  LOGO]  Ernst & Young LLP   Phone: (612) 343-1000 2 South Sixth Street, Ste. 1400  www.ey.comMinneapolis, MN 55402-4509  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, except for criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) through 1122 (d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.  Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  February 26, 2007  A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global Ex 34 k) [KPMG logo] KPMG LLP 303 East Wacker Drive  Chicago, IL 60601-5212  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors  The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank National Association:  We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix I, that the Document Custody section of the Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank National Association complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the Platform) as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) are applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, and that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the document custody services provided by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.  Our examination was cond ucted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.  In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the period ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.  /s/: KPMG LLP  Chicago, Illinois  March 1,2007  KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U S.  member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.