Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 15, 2010 / Proposed Rules 56027 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule is 

categorically excluded, under figure 2– 

1, paragraph (34)(h), of this instruction. 

The special local regulation is necessary 

to provide for the safety of the general 

public and event participants from 

potential hazards associated with 

vessels. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05– 

0813 to read as follows: 

§ 100.35–T05–0813 Wrightsville Channel, 

Wrightsville Beach, NC. 

(a) The waters of Banks Channel, 

adjacent to Wrightsville Beach, NC, 

from the southern tip of Wrightsville 

Beach approximate position latitude 

34°11′15′′ N., longitude 077°48′51′′ W., 

thence northeast to Seapath Marina, 

Wrightsville Beach, NC, approximate 

position latitude 34°11′45′′ N., longitude 

077°48′27′′ W. All coordinates reference 

Datum NAD 1983. 

(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander means a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the Coast 

Guard who have been designated by the 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector North 

Carolina. 

(2) Official Patrol means any person 

or vessel assigned or approved by 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector North 

Carolina with a commissioned, warrant, 

or petty officer on board and displaying 

a Coast Guard ensign. 

(3) Participant includes all swimmers 

and support vessels participating in the 

‘‘Beach 2 Battleship Full and Half Iron 

Distance Triathlon’’ under the auspices 

of the Marine Event Permit issued to the 

event sponsor and approved by 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector North 

Carolina. 

(c) Special local regulations. (1) 

Except for persons or vessels authorized 

by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, 

no person or vessel may enter or remain 

in the regulated area. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

regulated area must: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately when 

directed to do so by any Official Patrol 

and then proceed only as directed. 

(ii) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Official Patrol. 

(iii) The operator of a vessel in the 

regulated area shall stop the vessel 

immediately when instructed to do so 

by the Official Patrol and then proceed 

as directed. 

(iv) When authorized to transit the 

regulated area, all vessels shall proceed 

at the minimum speed necessary to 

maintain a safe course that minimizes 

wake near the swim course. 

(d) Enforcement Period. This section 

will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 11 

a.m. on November 13, 2010. 

Dated: August 27, 2010. 

Anthony Popiel, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port North Carolina. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22931 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2010–0620; FRL–9199–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Revisions to the New Source Review 

(NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP); 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

(PSD) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Texas PSD State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA 

proposes to approve a SIP revision 

submitted February 1, 2006, as amended 

by a SIP revision submitted July 16, 

2010. This action makes no significant 

changes to the Texas PSD SIP; it merely 

approves reorganization and 

renumbering of the Texas PSD SIP rules. 

Further, the July 16, 2010 submission 

corrects certain deficiencies identified 

in EPA’s September 23, 2009 proposed 

disapproval. The EPA proposes to 

approve these revisions pursuant to 

section 110 and part C of the Federal 

Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before October 15, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits 

Section (6PD–R), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the Addresses section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley M. Spruiell, Air Permits Section 

(6PD–R), Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, 

telephone (214) 665–7212; fax number 

214–665–7263; e-mail address 

Spruiell.stanley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no relevant adverse comments 

are received in response to this action, 

no further activity is contemplated. If 

EPA receives relevant adverse 

comments, the direct final rule will be 

withdrawn and all public comments 

received will be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: August 31, 2010. 

Al Armendariz, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2010–22671 Filed 9–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS