alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Hall, Judge of Probate, *versus*Elizabeth Durell *et al.*

In an action brought originally in this Court, at a law term, in which action an ap« pearance is entered for the defendant, but no question of law, nor any defence, is intended to be made, and no plea is filed, the plaintiff’s costs of attendance are to be taxed for only three days.

Debt on a probate bond given by Elizabeth Durell on taking letters of administration on the estate of her deceased husband. The action was brought for the benefit of a creditor of the estate, who had obtained an execution against the administratrix *personally,*on a *scire facias*issued for that purpose, for waste of the estate. This action on the bond was entered at March term 1829, and an appearance was entered for the defendant. In May following, the defendant paid the sum due to the creditor, and costs of attendance for three days only, to a person not authorized to receive the same, (the creditor being absent,) under an agreement, that if the creditor confirmed the settlement, the action should be entered *neither party.*The creditor refused to confirm the settlement, unless he was allowed costs of attendance for the whole of March term 1829.

*Osgood,*for the plaintiff.

*Field,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The action was not put into a condition to authorize the taxing of more costs than have been paid. There were no pleadings, and no question of law was raised. It was necessary to bring the action into this Court, (which has original and exclusive jurisdiction in suits upon probate bonds,) but as it was settled by the parties, it ought to be presumed that there was no intention to make a question of law ; and the plaintiff’s counsel might, on the first, second or third day of the term, have moved for a rule on the defendant to plead, in order to ascertain whether there was any question of law. By analogy to cases standing for a trial by jury, costs should be taxed for onlv three days’ attendance at the law term.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT MCNATT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-34) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 29, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Robert McNatt, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert McNatt appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion to reconsider sentence.” To the extent McNatt’s motion can be construed as a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c) motion, the district court properly dismissed the motion because it was untimely. To the extent the motion can be construed as a motion filed under 28U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), the district court properly denied the motion both because it was untimely and because McNatt failed to seek authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion. See Brown v. Angelone , ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 97-7173, 96-7208 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998); 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Kesheanna JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NORAC, INC. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives, Defendant-Appellee

No. 16-2971

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 19, 2017

Filed: May 24, 2017

Robert E. Kinchen, Kinchen Law Firm, Helena, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Brian A. Vandiver, Cox *&*Sterling, North Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this employment-discrimination action, Kesheanna Jackson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

This' court agrees with the district court’s reasoning and concludes that summary judgment was properly granted. *See Beaulieu v. Ludeman,*690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant); *Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC,*521 F.3d 914, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court’s determination of state law is reviewed de novo).

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00227**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 

### 00227\00227_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part D a.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00227\00227_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00227\Certification Statement Plant ID 00227.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartins Creek_F5-6_091610.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartins Creek_WB-1_091410.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_ClosurePlan_AshBasin1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_EA_AshBasin1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_EA_AshBasin4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_MAP-1_091110.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\Supplemental Documents\00227_PPLMartinsCreek_MC B4 Form18R Narrative - Closure Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 00227\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Martins Creek_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 00227\00227_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00227\00227_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
##### 



Exhibit 23.02 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Homestore, Inc.: Our audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated March 25, 2003,
except as to Notes 13 and 21, as to which the date is
August 12, 2003, except as to Note 3, as to which the date
is March 10, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Homestore, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004 also included an
audit of the financial statement schedule for the year ended
December 31, 2002, listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP Los Angeles, California
March 25, 2003, except as to Note 3 of the financial
statements, as to which the date is March 10, 2005 4
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Andrew William Cox

, * From the 91st District Court

o f Eastland County,

Trial Court No

. 2552 4

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 1 9 1

- CR * March 14 , 2024

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J

. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6983 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6983

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Valdosta Road in Lakeland, Georgia, as the ``Nell Patten 
                        Roquemore Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2024

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. 
 Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Williams 
  of Georgia, Mr. McCormick, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Collins, Mr. 
 Loudermilk, Mr. Allen, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, and Ms. Greene of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 15 South Valdosta Road in Lakeland, Georgia, as the ``Nell Patten 
                        Roquemore Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NELL PATTEN ROQUEMORE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 South Valdosta Road in Lakeland, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Nell Patten Roquemore Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nell 
Patten Roquemore Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger Etess
Chief Executive Officer,
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
May 14, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the
Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 15

- 00206

- CV

IN RE Tamer F. MORSI

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 8, 2015

, relator Tamer Morsi filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining

of the trial court’s order requiring relator to execute consent forms to allow his ex

- wife to obtain

passports for their minor children

. The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for

writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011

- CI

- 15236, styled In the Interest of E.M., G.M. and L.M., Children

, pen ding in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Renee Yanta presiding.
**UNITED STATES**  **ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY REGION**  **IX 75**  **Hawthorne Street San**  **Francisco, CA**  **94105 September**  **30, 2016**  **Sweetwater Chapter,**  **Navajo Nation**  **Reservation P.O.**  **Box 105**  **TeecNosPos, AZ**  **86514 ATTN:**  **Sarah Lee**  **Subject:**
**Dear Ms.**  **Lee: Request**  **to retain**  **public documents**  **at the**  **Sweetwater Chapter** **for public** 

**inspection**

**The purpose**  **of this**  **letter is**  **to request**  **that the**  **Sweetwater Chapter**  **of the**  **Navajo Nation**  **Reservation retain**  **the enclosed**  **package at**  **the library**  **for at** **least sixty**  **(60) days**  **for public**  **inspection. The**  **package consists**  **of documents**  **related to**  **the United**  **States Environmental**  **Protection Agency's**  **final decision**  **on the**  **Clean Air**  **Act Prevention**  **of Significant**  **Deterioration amendment** **permit for**  **the McElmo**  **Creek Unit**  **Oil Production**  **Facility on**  **the Navajo**  **Nation Indian**  **Reservation near**  **the city**  **of Aneth,**  **San Juan**  **County, Utah.**  **We would**  **greatly appreciate**  **your assistance**  **for making**  **these documents**  **available to**  **the general**  **public. Please**  **contact me**  **at (415)**  **947-4156 or**  **r9air:permits@epa.gov if** **you have**  **any questions.** 

**Enclosure Sincerely,** 



# �M **Shaheerah Kelly**  **Environmental Engineer Permits**  **Office, Air**  **Division**
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6957 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6957

 To require that the President's annual budget submission to Congress 
 and any concurrent resolution on the budget include the ratio of the 
   public debt to the estimated gross domestic product of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2024

   Mr. Smucker (for himself and Mr. Golden of Maine) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and 
in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that the President's annual budget submission to Congress 
 and any concurrent resolution on the budget include the ratio of the 
   public debt to the estimated gross domestic product of the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debt-to-GDP Transparency and 
Stabilization Act''.

SEC. 2. RATIO OF PUBLIC DEBT TO GDP INCLUDED IN PRESIDENT'S BUDGET 
              SUBMISSION AND CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET.

    (a) President's Budget Submission.--Section 1105(a) of title 31, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(40) the ratio of the public debt to the estimated gross 
        domestic product.''.
    (b) Concurrent Resolution on the Budget.--Section 301(a) of the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) the ratio of the public debt to the estimated gross 
        domestic product for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 of 
        such year.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7032 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2024 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide the Congressional Budget 

Office with necessary authorities to expedite the sharing 

of data from executive branch agencies, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 7032 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Budget 

3 Office Data Sharing Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REQUESTS BY CBO OF INFORMATION FROM EXECU5 TIVE AGENCIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 201(d) of the Congres7 sional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 

8 U.S.C. 601(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘The Director is authorized’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘(1) The Director is authorized’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘(other than material the disclo12 sure of which would be a violation of law)’’ and in13 serting ‘‘(with or without written agreement) pro14 vided that the Director maintains the level of con15 fidentiality required by law of the department, agen16 cy, establishment, or regulatory agency or commis17 sion from which it is obtained in accordance with 

18 section 203(e)’’; and 

19 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(2) No provision of law enacted after the date of 

21 the enactment of the Congressional Budget Office Data 

22 Sharing Act shall be construed to supersede, limit, or oth23 erwise modify the authority of the Director to obtain any 

24 material under this subsection unless such provision spe25 cifically provides, by specific reference to this paragraph, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 7032 RDS

1 that such authority is to be superseded, limited, or other2 wise modified.’’. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Congres5 sional Budget Office shall submit, to the chairs of the 

6 Committees on the Budget of the House of Representa7 tives and the Senate, a report listing any request for infor8 mation pursuant to a written agreement under section 

9 201(d) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 

10 Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 601(d)), as amended by 

11 subsection (a) of this Act, made to any department, agen12 cy, or establishment of the executive branch of Govern13 ment or any regulatory agency or commission of the Gov14 ernment and any challenges faced accessing information 

15 under such section. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04896]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than April 7, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Manager) 
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can also be sent 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9eddf1f3f3fbf0eaedb0ffeeeef2f7fdffeaf7f1f0eddeedeaf2edb0f8ecfcb0f1ecf9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70331f1d1d151e04035e1100001c19131104191f1e033003041c035e1602125e1f0217">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Southern Bancorp, Inc., Arkadelphia, Arkansas; to merge with FCB 
Financial Services, Inc., Marion, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Premier Bank of Arkansas, Jonesboro, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 3, 2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-04896 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2013 of Pacific Oil Company (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.   Very truly yours,  /s/ Anthony Sarvucci Anthony Sarvucci President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director   Dated: January 13, 2015    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Pacific Oil Company and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.