alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    LEO M.
CHUPASKALeo M. Chupaska
Chief Financial Officer,
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
May 14, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the
Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                           (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)

    The undersigned executive officer of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                              /s/ Jerry M. Chancellor
                              --------------------------------------------
                              Name: Jerry M. Chancellor
                              Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 12, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0436 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0436

**2001/436/EC: Commission Decision of 22 May 2001 on the inventory of wine production potential presented by Portugal pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 (notified under document number C(2001) 1458) **

*
Official Journal L 154 , 09/06/2001 P. 0065 - 0065 *

Commission Decision

of 22 May 2001

on the inventory of wine production potential presented by Portugal pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999

(notified under document number C(2001) 1458)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(2001/436/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine(1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000(2), and in particular Article 23(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 provides for the presentation of an inventory of wine production potential. Access to the regularisation of unlawfully planted areas, the increase in planting rights and support for restructuring and conversion is subject to prior presentation of this inventory.

(2) Article 19 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 of 31 May 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, as regards production potential(3) sets out details of the information to be included in the inventory.

(3) By letters of 21 June 2000, 23 November 2000 and 12 February 2001 Portugal sent the Commission the information referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999. Examination of this information shows that Portugal has compiled the inventory for mainland Portugal (not including the Azores and Madeira).

(4) This Decision does not entail recognition by the Commission of the accuracy of the information contained in the inventory or of the compatibility of the legislation referred to in the inventory with Community law. It is without prejudice to any future Commission decision on these points.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Wine,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Commission notes that Portugal has compiled the inventory referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 for mainland Portugal (not including the Azores and Madeira).

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2.

(3) OJ L 143, 16.6.2000, p. 1.
Exhibit
        32.2









CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTIONS 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACTS OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Ronald
      E. Badke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July
                27, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Ronald
                E. BadkeName:
                  Ronald E. BadkeTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stanley Louie, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10‐K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CorTS Trust VI for IBM Debentures (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.             Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2010

/s/ Stanley Louie
#### Dora L. ADKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUBLIC STORAGE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1141

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Na-than D. Rozsa, SUROVELL ISAACS PETERSEN & LEVY, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. '

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action and denying her leave to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Adkins v. Public Storage,*No. 1:16-cv-01556-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *844the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This information contains summary financial information extracted from 
the company's Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND> <F1>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             92 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,692 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       30 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0       
<PP&E>                                              4      
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,931     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0    
<BONDS>                                           415  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<OTHER-SE>                                        296       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,931        
<SALES>                                             0          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  126          
<CGS>                                               0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      19          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    6       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 44       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    57       
<INCOME-TAX>                                       18     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                39      
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0      
<CHANGES>                                           0  
<NET-INCOME>                                       39 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
        
<FN>
<F1>  The balance sheet presented by Case Credit Corporation is unclassified.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Benjamin F. Carver et al., Appellants, *v.*John Bonner et al., Respondents.

(Argued April 25, 1872;

decided April 30, 1872.)

*670Decided upon the admissions in the pleadings and the facts. ,

*Albert Stiekney*for the appellants.

*Noah Navis*for the respondents.

Folder, J.,

reads opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
1 After he fi led his petiti on for post- convicti on reli ef, the pet iti oner fil ed what is st yled “amended petition for a w rit of habea s corpu s.” The issue rais ed in this plea ding is the s ame as in the po stconvict ion pet iti on. The t rialcourt’ s order de nyin g reli ef, howev er, does not di sting uish bet

ween the t

wo pleading s. Rega rdless, the petition for w rit of habea s corpu s was filed in the wron g court, see T.C.A . § 29-21-1 05, and, th erefore , would oth erwise h ave bee n dism issed.

2 The indict ment reads, in per tinent part: “ by the use of

force did unlawfully

engage in sexual condu ct with [the victim ] and cau se bod ily injury to [the victim].” 

# FILED August 31, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON GARY RUSSELL , ) ) Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9712-CC-00475 ) vs. ) MADISON COUNTY ) STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) No. C96-362 ) Respondent. )
O R D E R This matter is before the Court u pon the state’s motion to affirm the tr ial court judgment in this cas e in accordance with R ule 20, Rules of the Court of Cr iminal Appeals. The record has been filed and the petitioner, by and thr ough counsel, has filed his brief.

This case represents an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s post-conv

iction petition. 1 The petitioner is challeng ing the sufficiency of the indictment. Specifically , the petitioner claims the indictment charging hi m with aggravated sexual

battery is void bec

ause it fails to allege the requisite mens rea. 2 In Kimmel v. State , No. 02C01-9701-CR-00006 ( Tenn. Crim. App., Jan. 12, 1998), faced with this very

issue, this Court held that the indictment was cons titutionally and statutorily sufficient to s upport the conviction.

Accordingly, having reviewed the petitioner’s brief in light of the entire record on appeal, we find that the trial court did not err by dismissing the petition. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the s tate’s motion is granted and the judgment of the trial2

court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

_______________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E

_______________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUD GE

_______________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
#### Barry J. BLUEFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry S. COHEN; Joel S. Meisel; David H. Cohen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1046

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*767PER CURIAM:

Barry J. Bluefeld seeks to appeal the district court’s order directing him to obtain counsel or face dismissal of his pending derivative shareholder action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan*Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Bluefeld’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 12, 2018

a0905

Order 

Clerk

September 12, 2018

155842 & (10)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155842

COA: 336957

Wayne CC: 11-012059-FC

MARTELL LAMAR HARPER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
#### The Commonwealth *vs.*Alfred.

Presentment

[Átto. Gen. Morehead for the Com’th: no appearance for defendant.]

From the Circuit Court for Mercer County.

*October 20.*

In the trial of ah indictment or pre, sentment, proof fixing *the time*when the offence was committed, is not essential ■—except where time enters into the character of the offence. Evidence showing that the indict, or present, when found, was not barred by thelirn itation, is sufficient *as to time.*

So—

*Held,*that a present. for retailing liquor, *on the IZth of' Feb.*was sustainedby proof of the fact *about that time.*

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Granville C. Alfred having been presented for retailing to Jacob Lung, a half pint of whiskey, without license, the Circuit Court acquitted him on the ground that, as the presentment charged that the retailing was on the 12th of February, 1835, proof that it was *about*that time, was insufficient.

That decision was, in our judgment, erronébus. The general rule is that, except where time *11 enters into the character of the*offence,” proof of the precise time speeb lied in an indictment or presentment is not indispensable to conviction. And, as the d.ay on which the whiskey was sold to Lung is not material to the character or ex* istence of the *déliclwn*charged, and was essential for the purpose only of showing that the presentment was made within the limitation prescribed by law, we can perceive no reason for excepting this case from the general rule.

The offence charged is sufficiently identified by the proof of the sale of a half pint of whiskey to Jacob Lung, at *thaplace*specified in the presentment, *about*the 12th of February, 1835; and if Alfred should, after conviction, be presented again for the same act, he would, as we must presume; have no difficulty in identifying the two charges—and barring the latter upon a plea of *autrefois convict.*

Wherefore, as the presentment was made within a year after the retailing, according to any reasonable interpretation of the proof of its having been *about*the 12th of February, 1835—it seems to us, that the evidence was sufficient to authorize a judgment against the accused.

And therefore, the judgment rendered in his favor must be reversed, and the case be remanded.
Exhibit 99.4



The following certification accompanies the Authoritys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed
as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003.



Written Statement of Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Executive Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the Quarter and Six Months Ended March 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JEFFREY E.
HARTMANNJeffrey E. Hartmann Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer May 14, 2003




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0399 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0399

**2001/399/EC: Commission Decision of 7 May 2001 recognising the fully operational character of the French database for bovine animals (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 1183) **

*
Official Journal L 140 , 24/05/2001 P. 0069 - 0069 *

Commission Decision

of 7 May 2001

recognising the fully operational character of the French database for bovine animals

(notified under document number C(2001) 1183)

(Only the French text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/399/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97(1), and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,

Having regard to the request submitted by France,

Whereas:

(1) On 3 December 1999 the French authorities submitted to the Commission a request asking for recognition of the fully operational character of their database that forms part of the French system for the identification and registration of bovine animals.

(2) The French request was accompanied by appropriate information that was updated on 24 January 2001.

(3) The French authorities have undertaken to improve the reliability of this database ensuring in particular that (i) the delays for notification of movements, births and deaths shall be shortened to seven days at maximum, and the procedure for the control of these delays is introduced, (ii) all kinds of movements shall be recorded in the database, (iii) the existing measures for prompt correction of any errors or deficiencies which could be detected automatically or following the appropriate on-the-spot inspections, are reinforced. The French authorities have undertaken to implement those improvement measures at the latest by 1 September 2001. The French authorities have undertaken to inform the Commission in the event of any problems occurring during the implementation period of the abovementioned measures.

(4) In view of the situation in France, it is appropriate to recognise the fully operational character of the database for bovine animals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The French database for bovine animals is recognised as fully operational from 2 September 2001.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 1.