alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**NANOVIRICIDES
      INC.**








Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 USC 1350


(Section
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I,
      Eugene Seymour, Interim Chief Financial Officer of NanoViricides,
      Inc.  (the “Company”), certify, that to the best of my knowledge,
      based upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
      June 30, 2007 of the Company (the “Report”):





1.      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October
      15, 2007





/s/
                Eugene SeymourEugene SeymourInterim
                Chief Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 676

For the relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of

Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. GRAMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala, and Paul

Bjorgen of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF OF D.W. JACOBSON, RONALD KARKALA,

4 AND PAUL BJORGEN.

5 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

6 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,

7 $3,391,404.50 jointly to D.W. Jacobson, Ronald Karkala,

8 and Paul Bjorgen of Norwood Manufacturing, Inc. (now

9 dissolved) of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, for damages in10 curred relating to the termination of a contract with the
2

•S 676 IS

1 United States Postal Service for the manufacture of wood2 en pallets.

3 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED

4 STATES.

5 Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settle6 ment of all legal and equitable claims by D.W. Jacobson,

7 Ronald Karkala, and Paul Bjorgen of Norwood Manufac8 turing, Inc. (now dissolved) of Grand Rapids, Minnesota,

9 against the United States.

10 SEC. 3. NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.

11 Nothing in this Act shall infer liability on the part

12 of the United States.

13 SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 10 percent of the

15 payment specified in section 1 may be paid to or received

16 by an agent or attorney as consideration for a service ren17 dered in connection with this Act.

18 (b) ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACT.—A contract

19 that violates subsection (a) is unenforceable.

20 (c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Violation of subsection (a)

21 is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than

22 $1,000.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmie A. MCCORVEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15132 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(July 31, 2017)

Alicia Forbes, Robert G. Davies, Pamela C. Marsh, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Pensacola, FL, Peter G. Fisher, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee

Before HULL, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald W. Johnson, appointed counsel for Jimmie McCorvey in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McCor-vey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Executive Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, Gerald L. Storch, Chief Executive Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|December 12, 2006                   
|                                    
|/s/ Gerald L. Storch                
|Gerald L. Storch                    
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
Static vs. Total Efficiency

Why we insist on using both:

– So that the metric is correlated to the energy 

consumed

– To encourage the right behavior and obtain the 

right results (energy savings)
Misconceptions

1. Fan static pressure and efficiency are 

calculated from total pressure and efficiency 

(NODA - “static efficiency is, by definition, 

calculated using total pressure”)

2. If we don’t use total efficiency, we will be 

ignoring the energy that goes into 

accelerating the air. 
Arguments

1. Velocity pressure is not “useful energy” for fans 

without outlet ducts (Mathson)

2. Using total efficiency for fans without outlet ducts 

gives an advantage to smaller fans that consume 

more energy (Smith)

3. Fan customers are not willing to pay for velocity 

pressure that is wasted at the discharge at a nonducted fan (Stevens)

4. Europeans get it and have it in their regulation (no 

one would argue that they have a dual metric, but a 

single metric applied to 2 different fan types)
Assumptions

How Tested

Non-Ducted Ducted

How Applied

Non-Ducted

Good correlation

(metric represents

power consumed)

DW (blow through)

Utility fans (some on roof)

Other specific applications

Ducted

This situation

does not exist.

Good correlation

(metric represents

power consumed)
#### Carl WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Joe Gordwin, an FBI agent, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-16909

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted January 6, 2016 San Francisco, California

Filed April 3, 2017

David W. Dow, Attorney, Dow Law Office, Phoenix, AZ, Plaintiff-Appellant Peter Michael Lantka, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and MCKEOWN,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Following argument in this case, Judge McKeown was drawn to replace Judge Noo-nan.

MEMORANDUM **

At the time West filed his complaint, he had not yet presented his FTCA claims to the appropriate government agency. See 28 U.S.C. § 2676(a). The district court thus found that it lacked jurisdiction over these claims. Concluding that exhaustion of Counts 4, 7 and 10 would be futile because the two-year FTCA filing deadline had passed, see 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), the district court dismissed those claims with prejudice. But, while West’s appeal was pending, the Supreme Court confirmed that plaintiffs may seek equitable tolling of claims against the United States under the FTCA. United States v. Wong, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1625, 1638, 191 L.Ed.2d 533 (2015). At oral argument before us, West’s counsel represented that West has now presented his claims to the appropriate agency.

The district court also found that Counts 7, 9 and 10 failed to state a claim and thus dismissed Count 9 with prejudice as well. Because West had not yet exhausted administrative remedies, the district court did not have jurisdiction to resolve those claims on the merits. See Munns v. Kerry, 782 F.3d 402, 413 (9th Cir. 2015). We therefore reverse the dismissal with prejudice of Counts 4, 7, 9 and 10 so that West may refile and seek equitable tolling of those claims. We address the rest of West’s claims in a concurrently filed opinion.

REVERSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

_____________________________ _______ INTHE MATTER OF: ) ) ) TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ) Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement ) Between the United States Environmental 400 West Summit Hill Drive ) Protection Agency and the Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 ) Valley Authority ) Allen, Bull Run, Colbert, ) Cumberland, Gallatin, Johnsonville, ) Docket No . CAA - 04 - 2010 - 1760 John Sevier, Kingston, Paradise, ) Shawnee, and Widows Cre ek ) Fossil Plants ) )

__________________________ ______ ___ _ FEDERAL FACILITIES COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT EPA has reviewed all public comments submitted pursuant to Paragraph 211 of the Federal Facilities Compliance Agreement (Compliance Agreement) via www.regulations.gov , ID # EPA - HQ - OECA - 2010 - 0710. EPA received comments during the comment period which closed on May

20, 2011. EPA appreciates all the comments received and will issue a specific, written response to the comments by July 8, 2011. This written response will be published on www.regulations.gov, ID# EPA - HQ - O ECA - 2010 - 0710, and also at EPA's Coal - Fired Power Plant Initiative website at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/cases/civil/caa/tvacoal fired.html. However, EPA finds that the public comments do not warrant a change to the Compliance Agreement or an extension of the public comment period. The public comments received, while useful and informative, do not present any information that demonstrated that the Compliance Agreement is erroneous, or an y new policy concerns which EPA has not already2

consider ed. Therefore, EPA finds that the Effective Date of the Compliance Agreement is June 13, 2011, sixty

(60) say s after the Date of Execution of the Compliance Agreement.
SPAR GROUP, INC.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the three month period
ended March 31, 2005 (this "report"),  of SPAR Group,  Inc. (the  "registrant"),
the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1. The report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



                                          /s/ Charles Cimitile
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Charles Cimitile
                                          Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
                                          Secretary

                                          May 18, 2005


A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SPAR GROUP,  INC.  AND WILL BE  RETAINED  BY SPAR GROUP,  INC.,  AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



                                      Ex-4
Attachment links for Gabor Simon, Skypropics:

1. Phantom 3 User manual

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

2. Phantom 3 Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Intelligent_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guidelines_en.pdf

3. Phantom 3 Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer 

 http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Safety_Guidelines_Disclaimer_en.pdf
Exhibit 99.1


                        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
          as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
           --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Form 10-Q of Toys "R" Us, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ended August 3, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. Eyler, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.





                                             /s/ John H. Eyler, Jr._______
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Name:    John H. Eyler, Jr.
                                             Title:   Chief Executive Officer
                                             Date:    September 12, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Stephen D. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ STEPHEN D. ALLISON 
|                      |  |  |  | Stephen D. Allison     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6438 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6438

  To extend the waiver of limitations with respect to excluding from 
 gross income amounts received by wrongfully incarcerated individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 5, 2016

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the waiver of limitations with respect to excluding from 
 gross income amounts received by wrongfully incarcerated individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER OF LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO EXCLUDING 
              FROM GROSS INCOME AMOUNTS RECEIVED BY WRONGFULLY 
              INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 304(d) of the Protecting Americans from 
Tax Hikes Act of 2015 is amended by striking ``1-year'' and inserting 
``2-year''.
    (b) Technical Correction.--Section 304(d) of such Act is amended by 
striking ``application of this Act'' and inserting ``application of 
this section''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 304 of the Protecting Americans from 
Tax Hikes Act of 2015.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7066 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7066

 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to allow or study the breach or 
  alteration of the Lower Snake River dams or implement the Columbia 
         Basin Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2024

    Mr. Newhouse (for himself, Mrs. Chavez-DeRemer, Mrs. Rodgers of 
Washington, Mr. Fulcher, and Mr. Bentz) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to allow or study the breach or 
  alteration of the Lower Snake River dams or implement the Columbia 
         Basin Restoration Initiative, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Against Manipulative 
Negotiators Act'' or the ``DAMN Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO BREACH LOWER SNAKE RIVER 
              DAMS.

    (a) In General.--No Federal funds may be used to--
            (1) allow, lead to, or study the breach or functional 
        alteration of, including study of power, flood control, or 
        navigation replacement of, or provide dam removal technical 
        assistance for, the Lower Snake River dams; or
            (2) implement the Columbia Basin Restoration Initiative, as 
        proposed in the memorandum of understanding filed on December 
        14, 2023, in the District Court for the District of Oregon in 
        National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. National Marine 
        Fisheries Service, et al. (Case No. 3:01-cv-00640-SI).
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Lower Snake River 
dams'' means the following dams in the State of Washington, authorized 
by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (chapter 19, 59 Stat. 21):
            (1) Ice Harbor Dam.
            (2) Lower Monumental Dam.
            (3) Little Goose Dam.
            (4) Lower Granite Dam.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
AS REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,805)
<INVENTORY>                                        794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              (11,021)
<PP&E>                                          11,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,422)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,868
<SALES>                                          4,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,708
<CGS>                                            1,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (5)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (439)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>