alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Juan Jose Virgen VALENZUELA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-72588

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017 *

Filed June 30, 2017

Alejandro Garcia, Attorney, Law Offices of Alejandro Garcia, Commerce, CA, for Petitioner

Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, David H. Wetmore, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Jose Virgen Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factu*913al findings. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Virgen Valenzuela failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican government. *See Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder,*600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (generalized evidence of violence in Mexico insufficient to establish eligibility for CAT); *Alphonsus v. Holder,*705 F.3d 1031, 1049 (9th Cir. 2013) (despite “troubling country reports,” evidence did not compel the conclusion that it was more likely than not that the petitioner would be tortured upon return).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0640 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0640

**2001/640/EC: Commission Decision of 2 August 2001 amending Decision 2000/585/EC as regards imports of wild and farmed game meat and rabbit meat from Argentina, New Caledonia and Uruguay (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 2455) **

*
Official Journal L 223 , 18/08/2001 P. 0028 - 0032 *

Commission Decision

of 2 August 2001

amending Decision 2000/585/EC as regards imports of wild and farmed game meat and rabbit meat from Argentina, New Caledonia and Uruguay

(notified under document number C(2001) 2455)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/640/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on public health and animal health problems relating to the killing of wild game and the placing on the market of wild game meat(1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 16(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) The animal and public health conditions and veterinary certifications for import of wild and farmed game meat and rabbit meat from third countries are laid down in Commission Decision 2000/585/EC(3).

(2) Imports of such meat must take into account the different epidemiological situations in the countries concerned, and indeed in the different parts of their territories.

(3) Following a Commission mission and information received from the competent veterinary authorities, New Caledonia can be authorised for imports of wild game meat into the Community.

(4) Following changes in the animal health situation in Argentina and Uruguay and consequent amendments to Commission Decision 93/402/EEC of 11 June 1993 concerning animal health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of fresh meat from South American countries(4), as last amended by Decision 2000/401/EC(5), it is necessary to make similar changes for these countries for imports of meat from cloven-hoofed game.

(5) Decision 2000/585/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.

(6) The measures adopted in the present Decision will be reviewed in the light of the evolution of the situation.

(7) The measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annexes I and II of Decision 2000/585/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 35.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 251, 6.10.2000, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 179, 22.7.1993, p. 11.

(5) OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 49.

ANNEX

Annexes I and II are replaced by the following:

"ANNEX I

DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORIES OF CERTAIN THIRD COUNTRIES ESTABLISHED FOR ANIMAL HEALTH CERTIFICATION PURPOSES

>TABLE>

ANNEX II

Animal health guarantees to be requested on certification of wild and farmed game meat and rabbit meat

>TABLE>"
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. William Lee BENHAM, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11074 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

William Lee Benham, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent William Lee Benham has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Benham has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 'presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brenda TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7567

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 4, 2017

Brenda Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Turner,*No. 1:01-cr-00075-JPJ-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten*272tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, March 11, 2022, 12 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public 
by telephone: 1-877-222-5769, Conference ID #: 7593815.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a2a2f383633393b3c3c3b3328291a2f29393928743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f5f5a4d43464c4e49494e465d5c6f5a5c4c4c5d01484059">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of 
January. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted 
real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access 
CART (in English) on Friday, March 11, 2022, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-
only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not 
an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released 
Reports and Memorandums
    B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    C. Discussion and Vote to Appoint Samantha Le as interim Chair of 
the Maine Advisory Committee
    D. Discussion and Vote to Appoint Wayne Heard as Chair of the 
Washington, DC Advisory Committee
    E. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-04880 Filed 3-3-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0072 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0072

**2002/72/EC: Council Decision of 21 January 2002 on the signing and on the provisional application of an Agreement in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt on trade in textile products initialled on 12 November 2001 **

*
Official Journal L 033 , 02/02/2002 P. 0009 - 0009 *

Council Decision

of 21 January 2002

on the signing and on the provisional application of an Agreement in the form of a Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt on trade in textile products initialled on 12 November 2001

(2002/72/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Community a Memorandum of Understanding on trade in textile products with the Arab Republic of Egypt.

(2) The Memorandum of Understanding was initialled on 12 November 2001.

(3) Subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, the Memorandum of Understanding should be signed on behalf of the European Community.

(4) It is appropriate to apply this Memorandum on a provisional basis as from 1 January 2002 pending the completion of the relevant procedures for its formal conclusions, subject to reciprocity,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The signing of the Memorandum of Understanding between the European Community and the Arab Republic of Egypt on trade in textile products is hereby approved on behalf of the Community, subject to the Council Decision concerning the conclusion of the said Memorandum.

The text of the Memorandum is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to sign the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the Community subject to its conclusion.

Article 3

Subject to reciprocity, the Memorandum of Understanding shall be applied on a provisional basis as from 1 January 2002 pending the completion of the procedures for its formal conclusion.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2002.

For the Council

The President

M. Arias Cañete
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  12 p.m. on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04923 Filed 3-3-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
ilFF MILLER 810-100823-001 

rOMMITTES; <:>U ARME D ^!;RV;C•:S 

HANKina MiMatn 

SFltCr COMMITTEE ON IN1ELLIGENCE 

KANKINQ MIMHCn 

COMMITTEE O.N VETtiRANS' APfAIKS 

Coiigrc^is of tf)c llniteb ^ta m 

il^ousc of i%fpifstntatil)ts 

SlaSJit'tigtoit, D C 20515 

Auuusi 18.2010 

3.Si;S;.W Mi.,,.-. !.-- ':,•- • - I',: . .•.:•.•. 

fiMi i Wi : ;i-.?j Bin . i-, Fl :iJMi^ 

• ifJSO: ^t>;- !^p^^ 

fttt{j://tuffmillttr.haU]b().oou 

Tii d FroU! 1-a8fr.36/-)01' ) 

The Honorable Raymond Lai lood 

Secretary 

US Depanmeni of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington. DC 20590 

RE: Docket OST-2010-0124 

Dear Sccreiarv LaHood; 

•TJ 

'>/ 

en 

lis 

c75 

The Northwest Florida Regional Airport (VPS) located in I'on Walton Beach has recently filed a 

proposal for a grant under the Small ConiniunitN Air Service Development Program. The airport 

is seeking funding assistance ibr the specific purpose of recruiting additional air carrier service 

and diversifying public transportation options througii a low-cosi carrier thai is proposing nonstop service to its Denver. Colorado hub. 

As you are aware, viable air transportation is critically important to the economic well being of a 

community. Given the tragic impact of Deepwater Horizon oil spill and overall dowTiturns in 

touiism. there is a significant strategic importance in developing new markets for communities 

along tlie Gulf Coast, especially in communities that do not have a low-cost carrier. Northwest 

Florida Regional Airjiort is the most logical location for a distinctive new service and inclusion 

in the Small Community Air Sen'ice Development Program would greatlv benefit over 2 million 

people in the airport's potential catchment area. 

Thank you for considering Northwest Florida Regional Airport's application. Please do not 

hesitate to contact my olTice if 1 can provide an\' further infonnation. 

With warm personal regard.^., I am 

Member of Congress 

.TM/ee
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6282 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6282

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, as the ``Dr. Roscoe C. 
                   Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2016

    Mr. Serrano (for himself, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Engel, Mr. Meeks, Mr. 
  Higgins, Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Meng, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Katko, 
Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Israel, Mr. Hanna, Ms. Clarke 
 of New York, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Ms. 
    Slaughter, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Collins of New York, Mr. 
 Donovan, Mr. Gibson, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Reed, Mr. King of New 
  York, Mr. Zeldin, and Ms. Stefanik) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, as the ``Dr. Roscoe C. 
                   Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DR. ROSCOE C. BROWN, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2024 Jerome Avenue, in Bronx, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dr. Roscoe C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Roscoe 
C. Brown, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State v. Staton *et al.*

Criminal Case: no arguments : no error round : affirmed.

*Appeal from Sac District Court.*— Hon. J. H. Macomber, Judge.

Filed, June 8, 1888.

The defendants were indicted for the crime of mingling poisons with drink with intent to injure a human being. They were found guilty by a jury, and from the judgment rendered on the verdict appeal.

*763Robinson, J.

This cause was submitted to us upon a transcript of the indictment, verdict, motions for a new trial and judgment. No errors were assigned, and no argument was made for either party. In this condition of the case we have examined the record with care, but have failed to discover any error of which appellants can justly complain. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.
May 9, 2013

EPA meeting with members of the Chemical Users Coalition (CUC) (Attendees list attached). CUC made a presentation on a number of issues. See attached presentation. Part of the presentation was on the article exemption (see slide 7 of the presentation) . This discussion on the article exemption was in part general and in part in reference to several proposed SNURs . Mark Greenwood of CUC and Paul Malichky of PPG stated that risk should be a consideration in whether or not to lift the artic le exemption for these SNURs and for SNURs in general. Jeff Morris, EPA asked if there should be a specific risk consideration any time the article exemption was lifted for a SNUR. Mr. Mahlichky said yes. Jason Leuck of Lockheed Martin said that they do n’t have the knowledge on what is in articles. They have over 30,000 products that they use. Wendy Cleland

- Hamnett of EPA asked whether the companies go back to their suppliers and request that the a rticle not include a particular chemical

. Charle Ingeb retson of Boeing stated that many at EPA had the impression based on what Walmart has done that every company can tell its suppiers not to include a particular chemical in a product but that is not the case. Summary prepared by Maria Doa, EPA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,020
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,705
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,537
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,513
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,614
<LOANS>                                        180,270
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 237,102
<DEPOSITS>                                     196,586
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,059
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,538
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 237,102
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,476
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,442
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   120
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,038
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,793
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,245
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        5
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,186
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,186
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.78
<LOANS-NON>                                        803
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   381
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,039
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,192
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       39
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,158
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,158
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>