alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marie HENRY, as guardian, parent, next of kin, and for and on behalf of M.E. Henry-Robinson, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MT. DORA, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Florida, Brett Livingston, individually and in his official capacity, L. Severance, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-11351

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(May 31, 2017)

Tillman J. Breckenridge, Bailey Glasser LLP, Washington, DC, Jacob Derr, William & Mary School of Law, Williamsburg, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Marie Henry, Pro Se

Cindy Ann Townsend, Michael J. Roper, Bell *&*Roper, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellee City of Mt. Dora

Michael L. Forte, Rumberger Kirk & Caldwell, PA, Tampa, FL, for Defendants-Appellees Brett Livingston, L, Severance

Before HULL, JULIE CARNES, and BARKSDALE,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Rhesa H. Barksdale, United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Marie Henry sued the City of Mt. Dora and police officers Brett Livingston and L. Severance on behalf of her minor daughter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Among other things, plaintiff alleged that these officers had arrested her minor daughter without probable cause in violation of the latter’s constitutional rights. The officers moved to dismiss these false arrest claims, and the district court granted the motion. Plaintiff has appealed the district court’s judgment dismissing these false arrest claims.

Having heard oral argument and carefully reviewed the record, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order dismissing plaintiffs § 1983 false arrest claims against the above officers. We therefore AFFIRM the district court’s order of dismissal.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6933 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6933

 To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility 
    to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2024

 Mr. Fitzgerald (for himself, Mr. Vargas, Mrs. Kim of California, and 
 Mr. Sherman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide the National Credit Union Administration Board flexibility 
    to increase Federal credit union loan maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Access to Lending Options 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that as the prudential regulator of the 
federally chartered credit unions of the United States, it is of 
paramount importance that the NCUA place safety and soundness as a 
cornerstone of its oversight of these credit unions.

SEC. 3. POWERS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS.

    Section 107(5) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757(5)) 
is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting 
        ``(or, as the Board may allow by regulation, shall not exceed 
        20 years)'' after ``15 years''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``or will be the 
        principal residence of a credit union member, and which is''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-15XS (the
     "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Fifth Third Mortgage Company as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a
     GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage
     Funding, Inc. as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer,
     and Hemisphere National Bank as Servicer.

     Dated:    May 27, 2008

     /s/ Diane Courtney
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
     Title
506 A.2d 624

#### In re LOUIS S., Leroy F., Russell P., Joseph B. and Wayne B.

No. 14,

Sept. Term, 1986.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 1, 1986.

Submitted to MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, COUCH and McAULIFFE, JJ.

*774PER CURIAM.

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, in the above entitled case, it is this 1st day of April, 1986

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgments of the Court of Special Appeals be, and they are hereby, reversed and the cases remanded to that Court with directions to remand these cases to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for further proceedings to determine whether vacation of the orders of adjudication is in the best interest of the juveniles and the public. *In Re: Leslie M., Nathan C., Steven R. and Tammy L.*305 Md. 477, 505 A.2d 504 (1986). Costs to be paid by the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.
#### GONZALES v. THE STATE.

Appeal from Tom Green county.

*Practice.*— -State’s witness, O. 0., having testified on cross-examination that she was induced by the district attorney to make complaint, it was proper to admit rebutting testimony. It was improper as hearsay, to permit the witness, S., to testify to what the prosecuting witness told him the day after the offense, concerning certain matters pertaining to the offense. In the record there is not a particle of evidence establishing venue. Upon the grounds indicated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion by

Willson, J,
#### The Congregation Shaaer Hash Moin, Respondent, *v.*William Halladay, Appellant.

Where a contract for the sale of lands contains restrictions respecting the use to which the premises are to he applied hy the vendee, the vendor has the right to insert in the deed tendered in performance of the contract suitable provisions either in the form of a condition or a covenant to preserve and effectuate these provisions of the contract. If he inserts them in the form of a covenant and the grantee is entitled to a change in the form, or if he has the right to elect that a condition be substituted for a covenant, it is his duty to make his election or to provide the modification required before he can rescind the contract and sue to recover back the purchase-money paid. A mere general objection and refusal to accept the deed tendered is insufficient. (Church, Oh. J., and Peckham, J., dissenting.)

(Argued June 13, 1872;

decided November 12, 1872.)

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of New York, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered on the report of a referee.

This action was brought to recover $1,000 paid by plaintiffs to defendant, on the execution of a contract, by which the defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff a lot of land on the corner of Fourteenth street and Second avenue. The residue of the purchase-money was to be paid on the 1st day of May, 1864, when the deed was to be delivered. By the terms of the contract the defendant was to sell the land to plaintiff, a Jewish congregation, “to be used for a Jewish synagogue; the building to be erected to recede” eight feet from the line of the lot on Second avenue.”

At the time of performance defendant tendered a deed containing this covenant: “And the said parties of the second part, for themselves and their successors, -covenant and agree with the said parties of the first part, their heirs and assigns, that any building which may be erected upon said premises shall be set back eight feet from the line of Second avenue, and that said premises shall be occupied for a Jewish synagogue.”

This plaintiff refused to accept without specifying any objection or proposing any modification. *Held*(Church, Ch. *665J., and Peckham, J., dissenting), that the deed tendered was a substantial offer of performance, and that defendant was not bound to tender any different one unless plaintiff pointed out some specific valid objection, and offered to accept a deed with the clause in such form as it could show would be more appropriate, and until defendant was thus put in default the action could not be maintained.

*Amasa J. ParTcer*for the appellant.

*Samuel Hand*for the respondent.

Rapallo, J.,

read" opinion for reversal and new trial'

All concur except Church:, Oh. J., and Peckham, J., dissenting.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY AS REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,746                   7,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,456                  13,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,155)                   (255)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,786                   2,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,913                  24,103
<PP&E>                                           3,896                   3,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,110                  28,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,062                   9,843
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,753                  14,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,110                  28,125
<SALES>                                          3,524                  17,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,692                  25,049
<CGS>                                            2,209                   7,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,301                  14,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,002                   9,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96                      90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,516)                   1,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (931)                     637
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,586)                   1,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,586)                   1,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)                    0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)                    0.15
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 13034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-121, OMB Control No. 3235-0110]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form T-1

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form T-1 (17 CFR 269.1) is a statement of eligibility and 
qualification under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et 
seq.) of a corporation designated to act as a trustee under an 
indenture. The information is used to determine whether the corporation 
is qualified to serve as a trustee. Form T-1 takes approximately 15 
hours per response to prepare and is filed by approximately 2 
respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 15 hours (4 hours per 
response) is prepared by the company for a total reporting burden of 8 
hours (4 hours per response x 2 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication by May 9, 2022.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John 
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5e5e7f4eaf8d4dcd9d7dacdf5c6d0d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f6f6d7e60725e56535d50477f4c5a5c11585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 2, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04797 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/December%202012/P-13-0108/p130108.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:46:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0108 Focus Ready Draft 12/6/2012 ENGINEER: Austin \ REC PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: No Label: No TLV/PEL: MSDS not provided.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/December%202012/P-13-0108/p130108.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:46:17 AM] SAT (concerns) (11/27/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B2T2 . Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1.00) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/December%202012/P-13-0108/p130108.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:46:17 AM] the Bromine Recovery Unit (consistent with this IRER). POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0108file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/December%202012/P-13-0108/p130108.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:46:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0108file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-1/December%202012/P-13-0108/p130108.eng.txt[1/7/2013 9:46:17 AM]
---

Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Power of the Dream Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ildiko Rozsa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Ildiko RozsaIldiko RozsaTitle:  Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

No. 16-1386

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed: 12/29/2016

NLRB-28CA181475

Matthew J. Cute, Assistant General Counsel, The Trump Organization, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, for Petitioner.

Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Eric Briner Myers, Esquire, Davis, Co-well *&*Bowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Movants-Intervenors for Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of petitioner’s unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of the petition for review, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted and this case be dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Aisha L. Wilkes, M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (404) 639-6473,                         *AWilkes@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-04680 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P