alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           9
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,511
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,180
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,890
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,724
<LOANS>                                        360,330
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 517,336
<DEPOSITS>                                     304,081
<SHORT-TERM>                                   176,693
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,452
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 517,336
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,463
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,327
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   181
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,971
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,803
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,449
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,522
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       35
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,259
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,259
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       794
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.82
<LOANS-NON>                                        400
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    445
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,557
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       26
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,566
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,566
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7040 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7040

     To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2024

 Mr. Lawler (for himself and Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Undetectable Firearms 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE UNDETECTABLE FIREARMS ACT OF 1988 FOR 10 
              YEARS.

    Section 2(f)(2) of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 (18 U.S.C. 
922 note) is amended by striking ``35'' and inserting ``45''.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-520-CV

In re Daniel J. Barrera, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relator Daniel J. Barrera has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency

motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8, 52.10. We grant relator’s emergencymotion

for temporary relief and stay the trial court’s order granting the real party in interest’s motion to

compel, which was signed on August 18, 2014, pending further order of this Court. The Court

orders the real party in interest to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before

August 29, 2014.

It is so ordered on August 22, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5924 

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing services in the 

Sinai Peninsula of Egypt shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same 

manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2016 

Mr. MCCAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing 

services in the Sinai Peninsula of Egypt shall be entitled 

to tax benefits in the same manner as if such services 

were performed in a combat zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS PER4 FORMING SERVICES IN THE SINAI PENIN5 SULA OF EGYPT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the following pro7 visions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a qualified 

8 hazardous duty area shall be treated in the same manner 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5924 IH

1 as if it were a combat zone (as determined under section 

2 112 of such Code): 

3 (1) Section 2(a)(3) (relating to special rule 

4 where deceased spouse was in missing status). 

5 (2) Section 112 (relating to the exclusion of 

6 certain combat pay of members of the Armed 

7 Forces). 

8 (3) Section 692 (relating to income taxes of 

9 members of the Armed Forces on death). 

10 (4) Section 2201 (relating to members of the 

11 Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of 

12 combat-zone-incurred wounds, etc.). 

13 (5) Section 3401(a)(1) (defining wages relating 

14 to combat pay for members of the Armed Forces). 

15 (6) Section 4253(d) (relating to the taxation of 

16 phone service originating from a combat zone from 

17 members of the Armed Forces). 

18 (7) Section 6013(f)(1) (relating to joint return 

19 where individual is in missing status). 

20 (8) Section 7508 (relating to time for per21 forming certain acts postponed by reason of service 

22 in combat zone). 

23 (b) QUALIFIED HAZARDOUS DUTY AREA.—For pur24 poses of this section, the term ‘‘qualified hazardous duty 

25 area’’ means the Sinai Peninsula of Egypt, if as of the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5924 IH

1 date of the enactment of this section any member of the 

2 Armed Forces of the United States is entitled to special 

3 pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code (re4 lating to special pay: duty subject to hostile fire or immi5 nent danger), for services performed in such location. 

6 Such term includes such location only during the period 

7 such entitlement is in effect. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para10 graph (2), the provisions of this section shall take 

11 effect on June 9, 2015. 

12 (2) WITHHOLDING.—Subsection (a)(5) shall 

13 apply to remuneration paid after the date of the en14 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6317 

To require the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit 

a report describing a process for seeking public comment about proposed 

changes to mandatory design standards for public buildings, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2023 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the General Services Administration to submit a report describing a process for 

seeking public comment about proposed changes to mandatory design standards for public buildings, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVISION OF DESIGN STANDARDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the 

5 date of enactment of this section, the Administrator of the 

6 General Services Administration shall revise the process 

7 by which the Administrator updates or changes any P100 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6317 IH

1 guidance document or other guidance document estab2 lishing mandatory design standards and performance cri3 teria for federally owned buildings under the custody of 

4 the Administration. 

5 (b) PROCESS.—The Administrator shall ensure that 

6 the process revised under subsection (a) requires— 

7 (1) a public comment period for any updates or 

8 changes to the documents described in such sub9 section; 

10 (2) publication of such updates or changes in 

11 the Federal Register and on the website of the Gen12 eral Services Administration; and 

13 (3) a summary of any comments received dur14 ing such public comment period. 

15 (c) REPORT.—The Administrator shall submit to the 

16 Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 

17 House of Representatives and the Committee on Environ18 ment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing 

19 the revisions to the process required under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
US
Bank(logo)



| | Global Corporate
    Trust     
| | -------------------------------
| | 190 S. LaSalle Street, 7thFloor
| | MK-IL-SL7C                     
| | Chicago, IL 60603              
| |                                
| | usbank.com                     





Annual
Statement of Compliance

J.C. Penney Debenture- Backed Series 2006-1 Trust





I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), hereby certify that:



| | 1) | A review of the activities of the Trustee during the fiscal year covered by this annual report on Form 10-K and of the performance of the Trustee under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2006, between the Trustee and the
Depositor (the “Agreement”) has been made under my supervision;
                                         and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
February 28, 2022



| | U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Trustee
| | ----------------------------------------------
| |                                               
| | By:                                           
| |                                               
| |
Exhibit 31
----------

CERTIFICATION

I, Barry Bennett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced ID
Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 12, 2004

/s/Barry Bennett
Barry Bennett, Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Duane MONTGOMERY, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 17-6164

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: November 3, 2017

Louis C. Allen, Acting Federal Public Defender, Eric J. Brignac, Assistant Federal Public .Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, G. Norman Acker, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Duane Montgomery appeals the district court’s order finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect for the treatment of which he is in need of custody for care and treatment in a suitable facility and committing him to the custody of the Attorney General for hospitalization and treatment. *See*18 U.S.C. § 4245 (2012). Montgomery contends that the district court clearly erred in reaching this conclusion. We affirm.

In finding that Montgomery satisfied the criteria for commitment, .the district court relied on two written forensic evaluations prepared by staff at FMC—Butner as well as the testimony of a third forensic psychologist, The unanimous conclusion of the medical personnel was that Montgomery suffered from a mental disease or defect for which he required treatment at a suitable facility. Montgomery presented no evidence to contradict these opinions. Based on Montgomery’s medical history, the written evaluations, and the sworn testimony, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err when it found that he met the criteria for commitment under § 4245.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6395 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt the spouses of 

active duty members of the Armed Forces from the determination of 

whether an employer is subject to the employer health insurance mandate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2016 

Mr. HUDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

the spouses of active duty members of the Armed Forces 

from the determination of whether an employer is subject 

to the employer health insurance mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Realizing Opportunity 

5 for Spouses in Employment Act’’ or the ‘‘ROSIE Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6395 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF SPOUSES OF ACTIVE DUTY MEM2 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FROM DETER3 MINATIONS UNDER THE EMPLOYER HEALTH 

4 INSURANCE MANDATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4980H(c)(2)(F) of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol7 lows: 

8 ‘‘(F) EXEMPTION FOR HEALTH COVERAGE

9 UNDER TRICARE OR THE VETERANS ADMINIS10 TRATION.—Solely for purposes of determining 

11 whether an employer is an applicable large em12 ployer under this paragraph for any month, an 

13 individual shall not be taken into account as an 

14 employee for such month if— 

15 ‘‘(i) such individual has medical cov16 erage for such month under— 

17 ‘‘(I) chapter 55 of title 10, 

18 United States Code, including cov19 erage under the TRICARE program, 

20 or 

21 ‘‘(II) a health care program 

22 under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, 

23 United States Code, as determined by 

24 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in 

25 coordination with the Secretary of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6395 IH

1 Health and Human Services and the 

2 Secretary, or 

3 ‘‘(ii) such individual is the spouse of 

4 an individual who, at any time during such 

5 month, is on active duty in the Armed 

6 Forces of the United States.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to months beginning after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10.26


                         TANNING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
                                November 1, 1999



To:    Larry Tanning

From:  Henry Skelsey

Re:    Five Quarter Compensation Plan


    As we have discussed, Tanning has developed a compensation plan for certain
senior executives for the five-quarter period beginning October 1, 1999 and
ending December 31, 1999.  Your cash compensation for the period will be an
annual rate of $206,500 ($8,604.17 on  a semi-monthly basis).

    Your existing employment and related agreements with Tanning (including
provisions relating to non-competition, etc.) will remain in full force and
effect except to the extent related to cash compensation matters.  As to all
matters relating to cash compensation, including cash incentive compensation and
bonus arrangements, the cash compensation described above will govern, effective
October 1, 1999.

    We are extremely excited about our company's future, and look forward to
more success together. Please indicate your agreement with the provisions of
this memorandum by signing below.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       TANNING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                                       By:  /s/ Henry F. Skelsey



AGREED AND ACCEPTED


By:  /s/ Larry G. Tanning
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6821
RUTH ANNE KILPATRICK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus E. RICHARD BAZZLE; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-959-4-18BE) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ruth Anne Kilpatrick, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Kilpatrick v. Bazzle , No. CA-97-959-4-18BE (D.S.C. May 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7064 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7064

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 
  the provision of tree nuts (including shelled tree nuts) under the 
   seniors farmers' market nutrition program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2024

   Mr. Moore of Alabama (for himself and Mr. Vasquez) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 
  the provision of tree nuts (including shelled tree nuts) under the 
   seniors farmers' market nutrition program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers' Market Expansion Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``and herbs'' and 
inserting ``herbs, and tree nuts (including shelled tree nuts)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 7