alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices 

# Order

October 16, 2009

139015

LIGHTHOUSE PLACE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee,

v SC: 139015 COA: 280863 Berrien CC: 05-003263-CH MOORINGS ASSOCIATION, d/b/a/ MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ThirdParty-Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

HARBOR GRAND, LLC and LIGHT HARBOR MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Third-Party-Defendants,

and

LIGHT HARBOR MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Cross-Plaintiff,

v

HARBOR GRAND, LLC, Cross-Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is GR ANTED, limited to the slander of title issue. The pa rties shall include among the i ssues to be briefed: (1) whether the trial court clearly erred in rejec ting the defendant’s assertion that it acted on
advice of counsel in authoriz ing the recording of a 2005 amendment to a 1997 agreement with Harbor Grand, LLC, wh ich 2005 amendment purported to remove from a list of
easements to be terminated by the 1997 agreement a parkin g easement provided to theI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 16, 2009

s1013 2

Moorings in a 1985 agreemen t between the defendant and Ne w Buffalo Harbor, Inc; and (2) whether, if the defendan t acted on advice of coun sel in recording the 2005 amendment, a finding of malice is precluded, requiring the dismissal of the plaintiff’s slander of title claim against the defendant.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by the    Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Adiv Baruch                       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Adiv      Baruch                           |
|                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer and President |

----
# EUR-Lex - 32001R1245 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R1245

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1245/2001 of 26 June 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables **

*
Official Journal L 173 , 27/06/2001 P. 0006 - 0007 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1245/2001

of 26 June 2001

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1498/98(2), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in the Annex thereto.

(2) In compliance with the above criteria, the standard import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 June 2001.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.

(2) OJ L 198, 15.7.1998, p. 4.

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 26 June 2001 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

>TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Saratoga Investment Corp. (the “Company”) for the annual period ended February 29, 2020, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian L. Oberbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, Henri J. Steenkamp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 4, 2022



| | /s/ CHRISTIAN L. OBERBECK                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Christian L. Oberbeck                               
| | Chief Executive Officer                             
| |                                                     
| | /s/ HENRI J. STEENKAMP                              
| | Henri J. Steenkamp                                  
| | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer
#### Franco *v.*Fulton Bakery Inc.

No. 13267.

May 17, 1940.

Gbice, Justice.

The instant case can not in principle be distinguished from *National Linen Service Corporation*v. *Clower,*179 *Ga.*136 (175 S. E. 460); and under the ruling in that case on a similar state of facts, it was not error to grant the injunction, the agreement sought to be enforced, although in restraint of trade, being limited as to both time and territory, and not otherwise unreasonable.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*299
      *Joseph S. Grespi,*for plaintiff in error.

*Shelton, Pharr & Long,*contra.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Qaaid REDDICK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15330 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(April 28, 2017)

*834R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, 'E. Gregory Gilluly, Jr., Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before HULL, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

J. Wrix Mcllvaine, appointed counsel for Qaaid Reddick in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reddick’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATE OF AIRCREW QUALIFICATI~ 

TYPE AFM 60- 1 MAJOR COMMAND OTHER (Speci-fy) 

~ DATE COMPLETED .. OF Qg PROFICIENCY c:J TACTICAL MISSION STAN/EVAL 

CHECK c:J INSTRUMENT ASSIGNfvW.I\i'T' 12 Oct 66 

I. AIRCREW I DENT I Fl CAT I ON 

NAME OF EXAM! NEE (Last, First., Middle Initial) GRADE AFSN DATE OF BIRTH 

PONTI , ROBERT J. lst Lt Yv3l09349 23 AUF!. 

ORGANIZATION BASE 

509 AREFS 9 509 Bomb Wg (SAC) 

"TYPE AIRCRAFT (Model/Series) I CREW POSITION I CREW NUMBER (If applicable) 

KC-135A CP S-152 

II. PREREQUISITES 

AERONAUTICAL RAT! NG I FLYING STATUS CODE I ELI Gl BLE FOR CHECK AS OF DATE ORGANIZATION 

c:J YES D NO 

DATE TYPED NAME AND GRADE OF CERTIFYING OFFICIAL SIGNATURE 

, I I I. QUALIFICATION 

GROUND PHASE FLIGHT PHASE 

EXAMINATION/C~ECK DATE GRADE MISSION/GHECK J;>/ITE TIME 

' 

Emerg Procd Exam 11 Oct 66 96.7/H Crew/Tnst· .R 12 Oct 66 6:30 

Proficiency Exercise 11 Oct 66 06 '7/T-I / o I ~ 

! 

t 

STATUS/GRADE (IAW Command directives) RESTRICTION (As applicable) EXP I RAT! ON DATE 

Q ~1 Or>t. f..7 

INSTRUMENT RATING (Pilot only) UPGRADE (Include date) EXPIRATION DATE DATE CRITIQUE 

D NO. I D NO. z c:J NO, 1 l?t'vj_~ 

TYPED NAME AND GRADE OF EXAMINEE SIGNAT~v .. . 0 . Robert J . Ponti, lst Lt ?t/-~r/-:rn cz: 

IV. CERTI Fl CATION 

The above aircrew member has demonstrated Qg satisfactory 0 unsatisfactory performance and knowledge of 

procedures, techniques, equipment, and directives which GB would CJ would not assure the safe and suecessiul accomplishment of his assigned flying duties. 

for remarks) ORGANIZATION DATE !CHECK ~S APPLICABLE (Use reverse side 

1 D REMARKS 509 AREFS / 7 0 t::-/. b-6 

TYPED NAME AND GRADE OF FLIGHT EXAMINER 

;1~~k( SIGNATURE 

Samuel Vo Tyson, Lt Col :0 ().~ uJ.JLf -~/ 2 

I CHECK APPLICABLE BOX(S~se reverse for remarks) ORGANIZATION DATE/[? _ . ·' 

CJ REMARKS V CONCUR CJ DO NOT CONCUR 509 AP.EFS ·;jf N . 

y<~ vv , ~Jr&(., 

TYPED NAME AND GRADE OF REVI·EWING OFFICER " ;>:''"" /:~~I . j ·• ' I ' • " .,./ , c ~ 

Bernard R. Simon , Lt Col i1 ;J.fLtyv/L.d( {k-1\ . )\ .A/PPt..<f·•·V ., 

_I_ CHECK APPLICABLE BOX(S) (Use reverse for remarks) ORGANIZATION DATE 

3 c:J REMARKS D CONCUR D DO NOT CONCUR 

TYPED NAME AND GRADt OF FINAL APPROVlNG OFFICER SIGNATURE 

AF FORM 

MAY 64 8 REPLACES AF FORM ab 1 MAR 63 AND AF FORM 8C 1 OCT 62, WHICH ARE OBSOLETE. 

~ i 

' 

i 

1 

!l 

I 

H 

~ 

~ I 

' l 

! 

l 

! 

I 

u 

I 

~ 

I 

I 

I 

"
#### Nestor C. DOMINGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Megan J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General Pacific Area United States Postal Service, Agency, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-16784

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 8, 2017 *

Filed May 10, 2017

Nestor C. Domingo, Pro Se

*936Steven Josh Saltiel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nestor C. Domingo appeals pro se from the district court’s order taxing costs in his federal employment action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Bravo v. City of Santa Maria,*810 F.3d 659, 665 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

To the extent Domingo challenges the district court’s authority to award costs in this case, this court previously resolved this issue in *Domingo v. Brennan,*639 Fed.Appx. 418, 420 (9th Cir. 2016), and we are bound by this determination. *See S. Or. Barter Fair v. Jackson County,*372 F.3d 1128, 1136 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The law of the case doctrine ... precludes a court from reexamining an issue previously decided by ... a higher court in the same case.”). Contrary to Domingo’s contention, defendant’s amended bill of costs, filed after this court’s mandate issued, was not untimely, and our mandate did not preclude the district court from recalculating the amount of the costs award. *See Stevens v. F/V Bonnie Doon,*731 F.2d 1433, 1435 (9th Cir. 1984) (“The mandate is controlling as to all matters within its compass, but leaves to the district court any issue not expressly or impliedly disposed of on appeal.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 12 p.m. on Wednesday, March 9, 2022.

# PLACE:

 The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: March 3, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-04923 Filed 3-3-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,885-02

IN RE CHRISTOPHER LAMONT ANDERSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. 29095, 29096, 29097, 29098 & 29099 

IN THE 196 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HUNT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the 196 District Court of Hunt County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the th

applications have not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Hunt

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus applications, submitting a copy of timely filed orders which designate issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed any applications for writs of habeas corpus in Hunt County. Should the

response include orders designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served

with the habeas applications shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave

to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 16, 2015

Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4629-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-4629-DR), dated October 30, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued February 2, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Connecticut is hereby amended to include the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 30, 2021.

Fairfield and Litchfield Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-04586 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
a.1



    body {
      color:#000000;
      background-color:#FFFFFF;
    }
    a  { color:#0000FF; }
    a:visited { color:#800080; }
    a:hover { color:#008000; }
    a:active { color:#FF0000; }
    -->

  
  

PYROTEC, INC. 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION

125-E Wappoo Creek Drive

Suite 202A

Charleston, South Carolina 29412 

1-800-PYROTEC

www.pyrotecus.com


May 15, 2012



Desmond Brunton

4000 MacArthur Blvd., 9th Floor

Newport Beach, CA  92660


	RE:	ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Dear Mr. Bunton: 


	We are hereby inviting you to serve on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of PyroTec, Inc., a publicly traded entity incorporated in Delaware ("PyroTec").  Your acceptance of this invitation will be confirmed through execution of this correspondence below, and your execution of the enclosed Advisory Board Consulting and Compensation Agreement dated May 1, 2012 (the "Advisor Agreement").

	By executing this correspondence, and the Advisor Agreement, you are agreeing to comply with the duties of such an appointment under all applicable common laws, statutory laws, and rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  Furthermore, you are agreeing to perform your advisory services consistent with the enclosed Bylaws of PyroTec.

	I am looking forward to a productive and long-term relationship.  Please feel free to contact our corporate counsel, Anthony R. Paesano at apaesano@paesanoakkashian.com or (248) 792-6886 with any questions.


Very truly yours,


/s/ John Burns


John Burns

Chief Executive Officer


Agreed:


/s/ Desmond Brunton		

Desmond Brunton


Enclosures

cc:	Anthony R. Paesano

	Board of Directors
AMENDMENT TO SHUFFLE MASTER, INC









                                                                                                                                                Exhibit 10.33




 




March 13, 2002




Clarification to Shuffle

Master, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan




 




1.                Paragraph

14 of the Shuffle Master, Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “New Plan”) is

hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefore as a

new Paragraph 14:




 




14.                                 Modification of

Outstanding Options.  The

Committee may accelerate the exercisability of an outstanding Option and may

authorize modification of any outstanding Option with the consent of the

Optionee when and subject to such conditions as are deemed to be in the best

interests of the Company and in accordance with the purposes of the Plan; provided however, that except as provided in

Paragraph 8 hereof, no previously granted Option will be repriced by lowering

the Exercise Price thereof, nor will a previously granted Option be cancelled

with a subsequent replacement or regrant of that same Option with a lower

Exercise Price, without the prior approval of the stockholders of the Company.




 




2.                Paragraph

20 of the New Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is

substituted therefore as a new Paragraph 20.




 




20.                                 Modifications

to the Plan.  The Board

may make such modifications of the Plan as it shall deem advisable, but may

not, without further approval of the stockholders of the Company, except as

provided in Section 8 hereof, (a) increase the number of shares reserved for

Options under this Plan, (b) change the manner of determining the Option

Exercise Price for Incentive Stock Options, (c) increase the maximum term of

the Options provided for herein, (d) change the class of persons eligible to

receive Options under the Plan, or (e)

reprice any previously granted Option by lowering the Exercise Price or cancel

any previously granted Option with a subsequent replacement or regrant of that

same Option with a lower Exercise Price.




 




3.             Except

as expressly clarified hereby, the New Plan is reconfirmed and ratified as

being in full force and effect.




 








	

  \s\ Mark L. Yoseloff


  
	

  Mark L. Yoseloff


  
	

  Chairman


  










 




 








	

  \s\ Mark A. Lipparelli


  
	

  Mark A. Lipparelli


  
	

  Secretary