Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2022 / Notices 12659 

1See Steel Propane Cylinders from Thailand: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2020, 86 FR 49295 

(September 2, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Steel Propane Cylinders 

from Thailand: Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty administrative 

Review; 2018/2020,’’ dated December 14, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Steel 

Propane Cylinders from Thailand; 2018–2020,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Steel Propane Cylinders from the People’s 

Republic of China and Thailand: Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 41703 (August 15, 

2019) (Order). 

5See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Scope of the Order.’’ 

6See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–839] 

Steel Propane Cylinders From 

Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Sahamitr 

Pressure Container Plc. (also known as 

Sahamitr Pressure Container Public 

Company Limited) made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR), 

December 27, 2018, through July 31, 

2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 2, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results 1 and 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. On December 

14, 2021, Commerce extended the 

deadline for the final results to March 

1, 2022.2 For a summary of events that 

occurred since the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is steel propane cylinders from 

Thailand. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an Appendix. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of the Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the period December 

27, 2018, through July 31, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Sahamitr Pressure Container 

Plc ..................................... 13.89 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after publication of 

these final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. We will 

calculate importer-specific assessment 

rates on the basis of the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for each 

importer’s examined sales and the total 

entered value of the importer’s sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is either zero 

or de minimis within the meaning of 19 

CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.6

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective for all shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for Sahamitr Pressure 

Container Plc. will be equal to its 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review (except if that rate 

is de minimis, in which situation the 

cash deposit rate will be zero); (2) for 

merchandise exported by a producer or 

exporter not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will be the 

company-specific rate established for 

the most recent period for the producer 

of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
12660 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2022 / Notices 

7See Order, 84 FR at 41704. 

1See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 59985 (October 29, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2We initiated this review with respect to POSCO 

and POSCO Daewoo Corporation. We preliminarily 

found that POSCO International Corporation (PIC) 

is the successor-in-interest to POSCO Daewoo 

Corporation (PDW) and treated POSCO and PIC as 

a single entity. See Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. For the final results, we continue 

treat POSCO and PIC as a single entity, hereinafter 

collectively referred to as POSCO. See ‘‘Successorin-Interest Determination’’ and ‘‘Affiliation and 

Single Entity Treatment’’ sections of this notice. 

3See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 59985. 

4See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’ dated November 29, 2021. 

The petitioners are SSAB Enterprises, LLC, and 

Steel Dynamics, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners). 

5See Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from Korea, 10/01/2019–9/30/ 

2020 Administrative Review, Case No. A–580–883: 

Hyundai Steel’s Case Brief’’ dated November 29, 

2021; and POSCO’s Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from the Republic of Korea—POSCO’s 

Case Brief,’’ dated November 29, 2021. 

6See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated December 6, 

2021; see also Hyundai Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Korea, 10/01/2019– 

9/30/2020 Administrative Review, Case No. A–580– 

883: Hyundai Steel’s Case Brief’’; and POSCO’s 

Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Republic of Korea—POSCO’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ both 

dated December 6, 2021. 

7See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016) (Order). 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

will continue to be 10.77 percent,7 the 

all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 1, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Final Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

‘‘Cap’’ Sahamitir Pressure Container 

Public Company Limited’s (SMPC) 

Reported Freight Revenue at the Amount 

of Actual Freight Expenses SMPC 

Incurred 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Made a 

Ministerial Error Regarding Treatment of 

SMPC’s Bank Charges 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Use SMPC’s Month-Specific Certification 

Expenses in the Final Results 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Reverse the Adjustment Made to SMPC’s 

Reported Scrap Offset in the Final 

Results 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–04756 Filed 3–4–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–883] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR), 

October 1, 2019, through September 30, 

2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Williams or Thomas 

Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5166 or 

(202) 482–0410, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 29, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

2019–2020 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on hot-rolled 

steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from 

the Republic of Korea (Korea).1 This 

review covers two producer/exporters of 

the subject merchandise, Hyundai Steel 

Company (Hyundai Steel) and POSCO.2

We invited parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results.3 On November 29, 

2021, we received case briefs from the 

petitioners 4 and from the mandatory 

respondents, Hyundai Steel and 

POSCO.5 On December 6, 2021, the 

petitioners, Hyundai Steel, and POSCO 

submitted rebuttal briefs.6 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 7

are hot-rolled steel. A full description of 

the scope of the Order is contained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that were submitted by 

parties in this administrative review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and are listed in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES