alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Withey, Charlotte

Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:57 AM

To: George Tsiolis

Cc: Nudd, Gregory; Webb, Thomas; McKaughan, Colleen; 'Giff, Jennifer'; 'Martz, Verle'; 'Lindsay, Brett'; Chen, Eugene Subject: RE: Followup to November 14 Call Between SRPMIC, Phoenix Cement and EPA



### George,

I’m!afraid!my!notes!on!our!Nov.!14!meeting!did!not!reflect!our!commitment!to!send!a!revised!cost!
analysis!

– my!apologies!for!the!oversight.!

The!requested!analysis!is!attached.!Please!n ote!that!the!revisions!made!to!the!October!2012!analysis!
were!based!upon!PCC’s!previous!comments!to!EPA,!so!there!should!not!be!any!big!surprises!here.!

Please!contact!Eugene!Chen,!copied!on!this!email,!with!any!questions!on!this!analysis.!Eugene’s!phone!

number!is!415

J 947

J 4304.

Thanks,

Charlotte!

Charlotte!Withey
Office!of!Regional!Counsel

U.S.!EPA!Region!9

75!Hawthorne!Street

San!Francisco,!CA!94105 Tel:!(415)!972

J 3915 Fax:!(415)!947

J 3570
withey.charlotte @epa.gov

________________________________________ The!information!contained!in!this!message,!including!any!attachments!hereto,!may!be!privileged,!confidential! and/or!exempt!from!disclosure!under!applicable!laws.!It!is!intended!for!the!recipient!only.!If!yo u!are!an!agency! employee!or!consultant,!please!consult!with!the!sender!prior!to!disclosing!the!contents!of!this!message!to!third!
parties.!If!you!have!received!this!transmission!in!error,!please!notify!the!sender!by!reply!email!and!delete!the!
message!and!an y!attachments.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael O. PEARSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7745

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 2017

Decided: May 24, 2017

*742Michael 0. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael 0. Pearson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pearson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 23.1



UHY LDMB Advisors Inc.  Chartered Accountants

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Border Management, Inc.


We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report of Border
Management, Inc. on Form 10-K of our report dated March 11, 2009, with
respect to our audit of the financial staements of Border Management, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008.


/s/ UHY LDMB Advisors Inc.
- --------------------------
UHY LDMB Advisors Inc.

Chartered Accountants
Surrey, British Columbia

March 26, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Virginia MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-16476 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(July 18, 2017)

Germaine Seider, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, *862Nicole M. Andrejko, Karen L. Gable, Nathan W. Hill, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Maria Guzman, Rosemary Cakmis, Rosemary Cakmis, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARCUS, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges..

PER CURIAM:

Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Virginia Miller, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
# L_2005185DE.01003702.xml

| 16.7.2005 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 185/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2005

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 185/37

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1777/2001 der Kommission vom 7. September 2001 zur Änderung des Anhangs I der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2658/87 des Rates über die zolltarifliche und statistische Nomenklatur sowie den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 240 vom 8. September 2001
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 240 vom 8. September 2001

Seite 5, Artikel 1, Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

| „b) | die Konzentration der aktiven Wirkstoffe oder der darin enthaltenen Stoffe;“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

die Konzentration der aktiven Wirkstoffe oder der darin enthaltenen Stoffe;“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | die Konzentration des enthaltenen Wirkstoffs oder der enthaltenen Wirkstoffe;“; |
| --- | --- |

„b)

die Konzentration des enthaltenen Wirkstoffs oder der enthaltenen Wirkstoffe;“;

Seite 5, Artikel 1, Buchstabe c:

anstatt:

| „c) | die Dosierung und“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die Dosierung und“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | die zu verabreichende Menge und“. |
| --- | --- |

„c)

die zu verabreichende Menge und“.

---
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0016

SAT Date: 11/1/2013

Print Date: 12/3/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0012-3/5-6

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 4.21 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 6.57 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.55 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to 

eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the 

compound.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 11.2

green algal 96-h EC50 6.3

fish _ chronic value 2.5

daphnid _ chronic 

value

1.1

algal _ chronic 

value

2.4

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines-Acids; SAR 

chemical class = Aliphatic Amines; MW 528; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

110

SARs Aliphatic Amines-Acid

SAR Class Aliphatic Amines-Acid

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### Gayle A. KERN; Gayle A. Kern, Ltd, DBA Kern and Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Sheryl MOULTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-15544

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed June 26, 2017

Michael A. Pintar, Esquire, Attorney, Glogovac & Pintar, Reno, NV, for Plaintiffs-Appellees

Sheryl Moulton, Pro Se

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sheryl Moulton appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motions for relief from judgment in this diversity action alleging malicious prosecution and other state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5*F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993), and we affirm.

*837The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Moulton’s motions for relief from judgment filed on February 9, 2016 and February 10, 2016 because Moul-ton failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. *See id.*at 1263 (setting forth grounds for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Moul-ton’s contentions regarding the district court’s prior orders because Moulton failed to file a timely notice of appeal or timely post-judgment tolling motion after the district court entered judgment on February 10, 2015. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed -within 30 days after entry of judgment or order appealed from); *Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc.,*476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th Cir. 2007) (“A timely notice of appeal is a non-waivable jurisdictional requirement.”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Moulton’s requests for appointment of counsel are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
## Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Compliance Information System - NPDES

Local Limits Program Report Created Date: 09/17/2013 Refresh Date: 6/27/14 Created By: HQ Version 1.0 NPDES ID: State: UT Report Date Range: 01/01/2007 To 04/22/2014 Local Limits Program Details Per Permittee

Report Received Date: 07/21/2007 

### Local Limits

Date of Most Recent Technical Evaluation for Local Limits: 7/21/08 Date of Most Recent Adoption of Technically Based Local Limits: 7/21/08 

### Removal Credits Removable Credits Application Status: Not Applicable Date of Most Recent Removal Credits Approval: Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Cyanide Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Zinc



## Div Local Lim Pollutants: Removal Credits: Facility Name: PAYSON CITY CORPORATION City: PAYSON County: Utah NPDES ID: UT0020427

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-


Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, I, Todd Noble, Chief Financial Officer of


Advanced
      ID Corporation (the “Company"), hereby certify, that to the


best
      of
      my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
      quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 4, 2005





/s/
      Todd D. Noble


Todd
      D.
      Noble, Chief Financial Officer
#### Gilbert Haas, Appellant, *v.*Maurice Wertheim et al., Copartners under the Name of Wertheim & Co., Respondents.

Submitted July 20, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*641
      *Raphael H. Weissman*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion denied, with leave to renew upon argument.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10


                               AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is made as of this 1st day
of April, 2002, by and between Stewart Enterprises, Inc., a Louisiana
corporation (the "Company"), and Everett N. Kendrick (the "Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an Employment Agreement with the
Employee dated as of November 1, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have agreed to eliminate certain
benefits payable to Employee upon termination of employment in consideration of
the inclusion of Employee as an initial participant in a Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the "SERP").

         NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the continued employment of
Employee by the Company, the payment of wages, salary and other compensation to
Employee by the Company and the benefits potentially payable to Employee under
the SERP, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of April 1, 2002:

         SECTION 1. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the terms and
provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         SECTION 2. Article IV, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.

         SECTION 3. Article IV, Section 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
renumbered as Article IV, Section 5.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
duly executed and signed as of the date indicated above.

                               STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.


                               By:
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                       James W. McFarland
                                       Compensation Committee Chairman

                               EMPLOYEE:


                               -------------------------------------------
                                         Everett N. Kendrick
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/12/2011 04:52 PM Subject: FW: Investors Support Clean Air Rules - 32 Investors with

over $28.6 Billion in Combined Assets Urge Timely Implementation

Hi Bob, Consistent with the EO, please see the attached letter that was sent to

us.

Regards, Cortney

From: Angela Bonarrigo [mailto:bonarrigo@ceres.org] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 3:40 PM To: Sunstein, Cass R. Cc: Higgins, Cortney; Hertz, Jessica R.; Angela Bonarrigo; Mindy Lubber;
Dan Bakal Subject: Investors Support Clean Air Rules - 32 Investors with over $28.6 Billion in Combined Assets Urge Timely Implementation

Dear Mr. Sunstein,

Please find attached a letter on behalf of 32 Ceres investor partners with over $28.6 billion in combined assets under management. The letter encourages timely implementation of the CSAPR and the Utility MACT rules; highlighting that the two rules will create jobs and that a majority of the nation's electricity generating fleet is prepared and ready to comply. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Best, Angela

Angela Bonarrigo Director, Washington DC Office

Ceres

1101 14th Street, NW | Suite 1200 Washington DC 20005 p. 202-480-2127 x 1013
m. 617-816-9102

www.ceres.org

Investor Letter to Senate on EPA 12Dec11.pdf
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICON Capital Corp., the
Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the Annual Report of ICON Leasing
Fund Twelve, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.








Date:
March 30, 2009





/s/Mark
Gatto


Mark
Gatto


Co-Chief
Executive Officer and Co-President


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as                of the                dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the                Company                for the periods presented. |

|                                                                  |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:                     December 21, 2007 |   |
|                                                                  |   |
| /s/                Gary Cebula                                        |   |
| Gary                Cebula                                            |   |
| *Chief                Financial Officer*                              |   |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6759 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut (for himself and Mr. BACON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Segal AmeriCorps 

5 Education Award Tax Relief Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS 

7 EDUCATIONAL AWARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (B), by striking the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6759 IH

1 period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘, 

2 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new subpara3 graph: 

4 ‘‘(D) a national service educational award 

5 under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

6 Community Service Act of 1990.’’. 

7 (b) EXCLUSION OF DISCHARGE OF STUDENT LOAN

8 DEBT.—Subsection (f) of section 108 of such Code is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new para10 graph: 

11 ‘‘(6) PAYMENTS UNDER NATIONAL SERVICE

12 EDUCATIONAL AWARD PROGRAMS.—In the case of 

13 an individual, gross income shall not include any 

14 amount received under a national service educational 

15 award under subtitle D of title I of the National and 

16 Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 

17 et seq.).’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

20 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04584]



[[Page 12476]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4513-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 10 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-4513-DR), dated 
April 2, 2020, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on February 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, David 
Warrington, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Chad M. Gorman as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04584 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P