alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34 (n)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 2800
600 Peachtree Street
Atlanta Georgia 30308-2215

Phone: (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Company)
complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Sterling
Integrated Product Solution (ZIPS) hazard insurance outsourcing Platform
(Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has
determined that only certain servicing criteria 1122 (d) 1(iv), 1122 (d) 2(vi),
1122 (d) 4(xi), 1122 (d) 4(xii), and 1122 (d) 4(xiii) are applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's assertion for
the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
for the ZIPS Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young

February 20, 2007

A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
# Flo Mahboob Rana

~ ~ Manager, Simulator QualiBcaGon

August 21, 2014. Mr, Lany McDonald Air Transporfalion DivisionlNaGonal Simulator Program Branch, AFS-205 Federal Avialion Administration P.O. Box 20636 

### Aganta, GA 30320 Mr, Robert H. Frenzel Manager, Operalion Law Branch, Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulalions Division (AGC-200) Federal Aviafion Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washinglon, DC 20591


### Subject: Flight Simulation Training Device Qualiflcation Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Tasks Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Dear Mr. McDonald and Mr. Frenzel, FlightSafety International kindly requests that the Federal Aviation Adminisfralion grant an ezlension to the current comment period for the above men6oned subject. We request ihat lhe FAA exlend fhe commenl period for an addilional 90 days. We would like to review the FAA proposed lenglhy document thoroughly which will require more time to prepare our responsefsignificant comments for submittal. FlightSafety Interna6onal is looking forward to working with the FAA, Please conlact me if I can be of any assislance in lhis matler. Sincerely,
~ k: 

### Mahboob Rana Manager, Simulafor Qualihcation
C.C: Steve Fedynyszyn Steve Krull Greg Arend Nidal Sammur

700 Nodh 9"' SVeet - Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 74012•2847 USA - Tel +1.918.259.4100 - Fax+1.918.251.5597 AktMre HaOroxreycompany 1 iS0900I:20C8FS 72832Regifted
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Naeem Tyab, President of Mogul Energy International, Inc., hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      annual report on Form 10-K of Mogul Energy International, Inc. for the
      period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mogul
      Energy International, Inc.





Dated:
April 15, 2009





/s/
      Naeem TyabNaeem
      Tyab, President(Principal
      Executive
Officer)






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Mogul Energy International, Inc. and will
be retained by Mogul Energy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 85-6776.

#### Assaad *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,291
<PP&E>                                          74,141
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,407
<SALES>                                         67,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,268
<CGS>                                           50,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    197
<INCOME-TAX>                                        93
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Landec Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 27, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary T. Steele, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 8, 2011





/s/ Gary T. SteeleGary T. SteeleChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)





*
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            891,308
<SECURITIES>                                    2,490,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,532,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       42,010
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,241,344
<PP&E>                                          6,106,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,278,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,312,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,318,249
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           86,544
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,698,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,312,147
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,937,969
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,670,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                198,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,931,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      164,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,096,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,096,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.36)
        


</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.3    
  


 
 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
  MICHAELS STORES, INC. EMPLOYEES 401(K) PLAN
  (As Amended and Restated August 1, 1999)    
  


        Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authority of the Michaels Stores, Inc. Administration Committee, adopts the following
amendment to the Michaels Stores, Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan (the "Plan"): 


        1.    Section 9.2(a)
of the Plan ("Time of Distribution") is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 



        (a)  If
a Participant's vested Account Balance is greater than $5,000 ($3,500, for Plan Years beginning before January 1, 1998), but the Participant does not consent
to an immediate distribution, the Participant's Account Balance shall be retained and distributed on the earliest of the following dates: 



        (1)  as
soon as administratively practicable after the date on which the Administration Committee receives the Participant's written request for an immediate lump sum
distribution; 


        (2)  as
soon as administratively practicable after the date on which the Administration Committee receives the Participant's written request for installment payments pursuant
to Section 9.2(c); or 


        (3)  the
required commencement date under Section 9.5. 





        2.    The
foregoing amendment will be effective as of January 1, 2002. 


        Executed
this 17th day of January, 2002. 



	 	 	MICHAELS STORES, INC.
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

/s/ Sue Elliott
 Sue Elliott, Senior Vice

President/Human Resources











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.3


SECOND AMENDMENT TO MICHAELS STORES, INC. EMPLOYEES 401(K) PLAN (As Amended and Restated August 1, 1999)
Exhibit 34.1

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Bank of Scotland plc:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria, that Bank of Scotland plc (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for residential
mortgage-backed securities transactions of Permanent Master Issuer plc (the
"Platform"), except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(ii),(iii) and (iv),
(d)(2)(iii), (d)(4)(x) and (xii) which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and
for the year ended 31 December 2007. Appendix A to the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria identifies the individual
asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting
the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assessment about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended 31 December 2007
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG Audit Plc

Leeds, England
19 March 2008
#### Henry C. Henderson, Resp’t, *v.*William McReynolds, App’lt.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department,*

*Filed May 11, 1891.)*

False imprisonment—Damages.

In an action for false imprisonment the evidence showed that plaintiff was arrested and detained only long enough to walk across the street. The court charged that at most it was only a technical arrest, and that the measure of damages was entirely in the discretion of the jury. A verdict of six cents was set aside as inadequate. *Held,*error.

Appeal from order setting aside verdict and granting a new trial.

Action for false imprisonment. Plaintiff testified that the defendant asked a police officer to arrest him for assault, which the officer refused to do without a warrant, but did so on a charge of having locked defendant in a room, and took him across the street, where he met another officer and on his advice discharged the plaintiff. Defendant and the officer testified that defendant requested the officer to arrest the plaintiff for an assault; that the officer after enquiring into the matter refused to arrest without a warrant, and that the whole occurrence took only three minutes.

*Jacob S. Van Wyck,*for app’lt; *Lewis J. Grant,*for resp’t.

Pratt, J.

This was an action of false imprisonment tried before a jury who assessed the damages at six cents, which verdict was set aside as inadequate.

The judge charged the jury that, at most, the detention was only a technical arrest and that the measure of damages was entirely within their 'discretion.

This was right as the evidence showed that plaintiff was arrested and detained only long enough to walk across the street and the verdict was consistent with the charge.

There was no basis for any specific sum' as damages, and the jury having estimated the same as nominal it was not proper for the court to interfere.

Indeed it is not clear that a verdict for the defendant would not . have been justified.

We think it is clear that the case is one where a verdict cannot be properly interfered with.

Order reversed, with costs.

Babptabd, P. J., concurs; Dykhah, J., not sitting.
Page 2 of 2 

the studies. A complete discussion of the review of each study may be found in the attached 

DERs. 

Table 1. Summary of Data Evaluation Records Transmitted with this Document 

Guideline 

Number Study Description MRID Number Classification 

850.1010 Acute Toxicity of TGAI and EP to Freshwater 

Invertebrates 00103297 Acceptable 

850.1075 Acute Toxicity of TGAI and EP to Freshwater 

Fish 00103297 Supplemental and Acceptable 

850.1075 Acute Toxicity of TGAI to Chinook Salmon 46112001 Supplemental 

Not applicable Seawater Challenge Test to Chinook Salmon 46112001 Supplemental 

850.1400 Chinook Salmon Early Life Stage Toxicity Test 45915601 Supplemental
#### Nelson W. Foote, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Mary A. Norris, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant. Thomas Bulger, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant. Daniel G. Eastman, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant. James Lester, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant. Murdy B. Smith, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant.

(Argued December 17, 1872;

decided December 24, 1872.)

*A. P. Lanvng*for the appellant.

*George W. Cothran*for the respondents.

Judgment reduced to one penalty, and excess of fare paid without costs to either party. No opinion.

These cases presented the same question as in *Fisher*v. *N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co.*(46 N. Y., 644).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Futures Strategic Trust for the period July 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr                                                                                                                                                                
|Title:             |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,Managing Owner ofFutures Strategic Trust
|                   | 
|Date:              |  | November 12, 2008
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                          (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

    The undersigned executive officer of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc., (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                              /s/ Bill W. Taylor
                              -------------------------------------------
                              Name: Bill W. Taylor
                              Title: Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 12, 2003


    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PLANTS POTENTIALLY USING PALM AS FEEDSTOCK

PLANT ST CAPACITY (GAL) POTENTIAL

IMPERIUM RENEWABLE WA 100,000,000 25% 25,000,000

GREEN EARTH TX 50,000,000 25% 12,500,000

REG TX 50,000,000 25% 12,500,000

SUN PRODUCTS TX 25,000,000 100% 25,000,000

ORGANIC TX 25,000,000 25% 6,250,000

RBF TX 180,000,000 25% 45,000,000

US BIO GA 25,000,000 25% 6,250,000

GREEN DIESEL TX 40,000,000 25% 10,000,000

METRO NY 100,000,000 25% 25,000,000

GREEN HUNTER TX 105,000,000 25% 26,250,000

 700,000,000 28% 193,750,000

Projected provided by American Palm Oil Council, September 1, 2010