alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nathan E. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRFIELD INN SUITES-MARRIOTT, RDU, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1047

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Nathan E. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Regina Worley Calabro, Robert Allen Sar, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK *&*STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan E. Wilson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and denying without prejudice his motion regarding mediation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wilson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IB 

Union Calendar No. 404 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6960 

[Report No. 118–488] 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 

Medical Services for Children program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. JOYCE of 

Pennsylvania, and Ms. SCHRIER) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MAY 7, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. RUIZ, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. THANEDAR, Ms. 

ROSS, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, and Mr. GOTTHEIMER

MAY 7, 2024 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce; committed to the 

Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered 

to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6960 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children program. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6960 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical 

5 Services for Children Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY 

7 MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN. 

8 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

10 $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘$22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

12 through 2024, and $24,334,000 for each of fiscal years 

13 2025 through 2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 404 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6960 

[Report No. 118–488] 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reaudren program. thorize the Emergency Medical Services for ChilMAY 7, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Chester Lee BARNES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. M. Travis BRAGG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7263

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted; August 3, 2017

Decided: August 25, 2017

Chester Lee Barnes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lee Barnes, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *630
      *Barnes v. Bragg,*No. 8:15-cv-02842-HMH, 2016 WL 4040295 (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6990 

To modify the bases for ineligibility for countries to benefit from the 

Generalized System of Preferences, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2024 

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To modify the bases for ineligibility for countries to benefit 

from the Generalized System of Preferences, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Digital Trade for De5 velopment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE 

7 COUNTRIES. 

8 Section 502 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

9 2462) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)(2)— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6990 IH

1 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) 

2 through (H) as subparagraphs (E) through (I), 

3 respectively; 

4 (B) in the matter following subparagraph 

5 (H), by striking ‘‘(D), (E), (F), (G), and (H) 

6 (to the extent described in section 507(6)(D))’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘(D), (E), (F), (G), (H), and (I) 

8 (to the extent described in section 507(6)(D))’’; 

9 and 

10 (C) by inserting after subparagraph (C) 

11 the following new subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(D) The President, acting through the 

13 United States Trade Representative, determines 

14 that such country restricts digital trade to the 

15 detriment of United States development goals, 

16 strategic interests, or competitiveness.’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (c)— 

18 (A) in paragraph (6)(B), by striking ‘‘; 

19 and’’ and the end and inserting a semicolon; 

20 (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe21 riod at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

22 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

23 paragraph: 

24 ‘‘(8) the extent to which such country— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6990 IH

1 ‘‘(A) has refrained from imposing digital 

2 trade barriers, such as unnecessary or discrimi3 natory data localization or data transfer restric4 tions, discriminatory treatment of digital prod5 ucts, or forced disclosure of proprietary source 

6 code; and 

7 ‘‘(B) has taken steps in the digital environ8 ment to support consumer protections, the pri9 vacy of personal information, and open digital 

10 ecoystems.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
201 0 DE C - b P 2 : 1 8 ,*• • »»•'• . •'-• V Novembe r

15,201 0

* • " 1 Kt^' v Hearin g Docke t Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n Orvill e Wrigh t

Buildin g 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S . W. , Washingto nD . C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AG C -43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0 Re : IntheMattero f

Ai r ZFlyin g Servic e Inc . . ^ r > IA

—f: i FA A Docke t

No . (t o b e assigned ) : Cas e No . 2009SW91005 1 Qjp j D ^ W^ ^ 0 /

(=f{[A 

## 2o;o'091 V Dear Si r o r Madam : Enclose dpleas e FIN D th e answe r o f th e respondent . Air

ZFlyin g Service , t o th e above - reference d case : Sincerely , Laurenc e E . Rohl , President , Air

ZFlyin g Servic e Inc . 35 5 Richmon dRd . Hangar 5 Richmon dHeights , Ohi o

2630 0 Curtis s Wrigh t Parlcway• Richmon d Heights , Ohi o 4414 3 Phon e (216 ) 261-299 2 • Tol l Fre e (866 ) 953-299 2 • Fa x(216 ) 261-299 3 • www.airzflyingservice.co mU.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

I nth e matte r

o f AI RZFLYIN GSERVIC EINC . FA A Docke t No . C P(t o b e assigned ) Cas e No . 200 9 SW91005 1 JUDGE : (t o b e assigned )

Responden t

Air ZFlyin g Servic e Inc. , b y an dthroug hit s president , Laurenc e ERohl , an dstate s for

it s answe r

t o th e complain t

a s follows : Th e allegation s o f

Sectio nI ar e admitted . Th e allegation s o f

Section s nresponde dt o a s follows : Th e allegation s o f

paragrap h1 ar e admitted . Th e allegation s o f

paragraph s 2 , 3 , 4 , an d5 o f th e complain t

ar e denie dfo r

wan t o f knowledge . Th e allegation s o f

paragrap h6 ar e denie dan ddenie dfo r wan t o f knowledge . Th e allegation s o f

Sectio nmar e denied , an ddenie dfo r wan t o f knowledge . Affirmativ e Defenses : Th e complain t

i s barre db y th e statut e o f limitation sTh e complain t i s barre db y th e equitabl e doctrine s o f waiver , lache s an destoppel . Th e complain t

i s barre db y intervenin g an dsupersedin g event s o f thir dpartie s ove r

whic h responden t

ha s n o contro l Th e complain t

i s barre db y th e failur e t o joi nnecessary an dindispensibl e parties . An y allegation s o f

th e complain t

no t specificall y admitted , ar e hereb y denied . Th e responden t

request s tha t

th e hearin g b e hel di nCleveland , Ohio . Respectfijll y Submitted , Laurenc e E . Rohl , Presiden t Air ZFlyin g Servic e Inc . 35 5 Richmon dRd . Hangar 5 Richmon dHeights , Ohi o 4414 3 216-261-299 2Certificat e o f Servic e A cop y o f thi s answe r

t o th e complain t

wa s serve dthi s 1- ^ day o f Novembe r

201 0 by regular mai l an dcertifie dmai l on : 1 . Agne s Rodriguez , Senio r Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-300 , Federa l Aviatio n i Administration , Offic e o f Chie f Counsel , 80 0 Independenc e Ave . S.W . Washingto nD . C . 20591 . 

# i I 2 . Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio nAdministration , Orvill e Wrigh t Building , 80 0 Independenc e I Avenu e S . W. , Washingto nD . C . 2059 1 

## i i Laurenc e E . Roh l 

### ^ f

a
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Gazit-Globe
Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dor J. Segal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: April 27, 2017   | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Dor J. Segal        | 
|Dor J. Segal            | 
|Chief Executive Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro GUERRERO-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant

No. 15-10155 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Alejandro Guerrero-Aguilar, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alejandro Guerrero-Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guerrero-Aguilar filed a response to his prior appellate attorney’s motion to withdraw pursuant to *Anders,*but that motion was later withdrawn when new counsel was appointed. Guerrero-Aguilar has not filed a response to his new counsel’s motion. Insofar as Guerrero-Aguilar’s response raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, the record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of those claims. We therefore decline to consider these claims without prejudice to collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Guerrero-Aguilar’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Per the policies and procedures required by the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Title I, Part E,

Section 183, responses to this dat a collection will be used only for statistical purposes. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings across the sample and will not associate responses with a specific district or individual. Any willful disclosure of such information for n onstatistical purposes, except as required by law, is a class E felony. 

### The On

- Time Graduation Study School Survey Consent Form

PURPOSE

The On

- Time Graduation Study is being conducted by the Midwest Regional Educational Laboratory at American Institutes for Research (AIR). It is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
Education Sciences and will run from January 2014 throu gh the spring of 2016. The purpose of this survey is to ask school administrators about their school data culture and how they use student data to identify and intervene with students who may be at

- risk for dropping out of high school.

PROCEDURES
Partic ipation includes an online survey that will take approximately 60 minutes to complete. You can start or stop the survey at any point and your answers will be saved on the online system.

RISKS AND DISCOMFORTS There are no known risks for participation. Y our participation in this study is voluntary. You will not be penalized in any way for not participating. If you decide to participate, you may discontinue at any time without penalty.

CONFIDENTIALITY You are not required to answer questions that you do not want to answer. Responses will be used only for research purposes and will be kept strictly confidential. Each participant is assigned a study identification number in place of their names. The reports prepared for this study will summarize findings an d will not associate responses with a specific school or individual. We will not provide information that identifies you or your school to anyone outside the study team, except as required by law.

BENEFITS Your participation will help the U.S. Department of Education better understand how schools use data to identify and intervene with students who may be at

- risk for dropping out of high school.

MORE INFORMATION Upon completion of the survey, you will receive a $30 gift card. If you have any questions a bout the gift cards, please contact Suzanne Stachel at sstachel@air.org or 202

- 403

- 5584. For more information about the study in general, you may contact Dr. Ann

- Marie Faria, Project Director, at afaria@air.org or 202

- 403

- 5356. If you have concerns or questions about your rights as a participant, contact AIR’s Institutional Review Board (which is responsible for the protection of project participants) at IRB@air.org , toll free at

1

- 800

- 634

- 0797, or c/o IRB, 1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.

INFORMED CONSENT

 YES

, I have read and understand the information above and I agree to participate in this online

survey.

 NO

, I have read and understand the information above and do not agree to participate in this online survey.


#### Sabrina Renee BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYS R US DELAWARE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1315

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

Sabrina Renee Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sabrina Renee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint under 28' U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because it is possible that Brown could cure the defects in her complaint through amendment, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Brown to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented- in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 677 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 677

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To repeal a redundant venue provision, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsection (a) of section 1392 of title 28, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Subsection (b) of section 1392 of title 
28, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(b) Any'' and 
inserting ``Any''.
            Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 677

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To repeal a redundant venue provision, and for other purposes.
```
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of TravelCenters of America LLC (the Company) of our report dated February 26, 2009, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of the Company included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008:  ·Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-156926) ·Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-154735) pertaining to the TravelCenters
of America LLC 2007 Equity Compensation Plan   /s/
  Ernst & Young, LLPBoston,
  MassachusettsFebruary 26,
  2009
**
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-227116) on Form N-2 of Saratoga Investment Corp. of our reports dated May 6, 2020 with respect to the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as ofFebruary 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows for each year ended February 29, 2020, February 28, 2019 and February 28, 2018, and therelated notes to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Saratoga Investment Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of SaratogaInvestment Corp. for the year ended February 29, 2020. 

We also consent to the reference to our firm under the headings“Selected Consolidated Financial Data”, “Controls and Procedures—Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Principal Accounting Fees and Services” in the Form10-K.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

New York, New York 

May 6, 2020 
**
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0249 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0249

**2001/249/EC: Commission Decision of 26 March 2001 fixing the maximum amount of aid granted for the private storage of olive oil under the first partial invitation to tender provided for by Regulation (EC) No 327/2001 (notified under document number C(2001) 823) **

*
Official Journal L 090 , 30/03/2001 P. 0062 - 0062 *

Commission Decision

of 26 March 2001

fixing the maximum amount of aid granted for the private storage of olive oil under the first partial invitation to tender provided for by Regulation (EC) No 327/2001

(notified under document number C(2001) 823)

(Only the Spanish and Greek texts are authentic)

(2001/249/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000(2), and in particular Article 12a thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 327/2001 of 16 February 2001 authorising the conclusion of private storage contracts for olive oil and opening an invitation to tender for a limited period for aid relating thereto(3), the bodies referred to in Article 1 of that Regulation are authorised to conclude contracts for the private storage of virgin and extra virgin olive oil they market.

(2) An invitation to tender has been opened for a limited period. Four consecutive partial invitations to tender are to be opened from 1 March 2001. The first partial invitation to tender is restricted to producer groups or associations of such groups as referred to in the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 12a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC.

(3) Article 12a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for the granting of aid for the implementation of storage contracts. On the basis of the tenders submitted in response to the first partial invitation to tender and with a view to making a significant contribution to regulating the market, the amount of that aid should be fixed.

(4) No tenders were received in Greece in response to the first partial invitation to tender.

(5) The measure provided for in this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the first partial invitation to tender provided for by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 327/2001, the maximum amount of the aid referred to in Article 12a of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be as follows:

>TABLE>

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain and the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66.

(2) OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2.

(3) OJ L 48, 17.2.2001, p. 9.