13700 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2020–2021, 86 FR 61131 (November 5, 

2021). 

2See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 

80 FR 8596 (February 18, 2015) (Order). 

3 Id. 

4See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131–32. 

These companies are: (1) AU Optronics Corporation 

(AU); (2) Canadian Solar Inc.; (3) Canadian Solar 

International Limited; (4) Canadian Solar 

Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc.; (5) Canadian Solar 

Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc.; (6) Canadian Solar 

Solutions Inc.; (7) Vina Solar Technology Co., Ltd.; 

(8) Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd.; (9) Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd.; (10) Hainan Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd.; (11) Hengshui Yingli New 

Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (12) Lixian Yingli New 

Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (13) Shenzhen Yingli 

New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (14) Tianjin Yingli 

New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; (15) Yingli Energy 

(China) Co., Ltd.; and (16) Yingli Green Energy 

International Trading Company Limited. 

5See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61131–32. 

6 In the Preliminary Results, Commerce rescinded 

the review with respect to eleven companies that 

had reviewable entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR, including the mandatory 

respondents, in response to timely withdrawn 

review requests from all parties that requested a 

review of these eleven companies. See Preliminary 

Results, 86 FR at 61131. 

7See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; Final Determination of No Shipments; 

2019–2020, 86 FR 49509, 49510–11 (September 3, 

within FTZ 93, in Durham, North 

Carolina. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (86 FR 62985, 

November 15, 2021). On March 7, 2022, 

the applicant was notified of the FTZ 

Board’s decision that no further review 

of the activity is warranted at this time. 

The production activity described in the 

notification was authorized, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.14. 

Dated: March 7, 2022. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05074 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–853] 

Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products From Taiwan: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 5, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic products 

(solar products) from Taiwan during the 

period of review (POR), February 1, 

2020, to January 31, 2021. We received 

no comments or requests for a hearing. 

We continue to find that 16 of the 

companies under review made no 

shipments of solar products from 

Taiwan during the POR. Moreover, with 

respect to the companies that did not 

submit no-shipment certifications and 

were not selected as mandatory 

respondents, we have determined to 

apply a rate of 7.89 percent, i.e., the 

non-selected rate from the prior (fifth) 

administrative review under this 

antidumping duty order. 

DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin or Zachary Shaykin, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936 or 

(202) 482–2638, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 5, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

We received no comments on the 

Preliminary Results from any interested 

parties. Commerce conducted this 

review in accordance with section 751 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is solar products from Taiwan.2

Imports of subject merchandise are 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings: 8501.71.0000, 

8501.72.1000, 8501.72.2000, 

8501.72.3000, 8501.72.9000, 

8501.80.1000, 8501.80.2000, 

8501.80.3000, 8501.80.9000, 

8507.20.8010, 8507.20.8031, 

8507.20.8041, 8507.20.8061, 

8507.20.8091, 8541.42.0010, 

8541.43.0010. These HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes; the 

written description of the scope of the 

Order is dispositive.3

Final Determination of No Shipments 

As noted in the Preliminary Results, 

we received claims of no shipments 

from 16 producers and/or exporters 

under review, and we preliminarily 

determined that these 16 companies had 

no shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR.4 We received no 

comments from interested parties with 

respect to these claims. Therefore, 

because we have not received any 

information to contradict our 

preliminary no-shipment determination, 

nor any comment in opposition to our 

preliminary finding or to record 

evidence indicating that these 16 

companies had no entries of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR, we continue to find that these 

16 companies had no shipments during 

the POR.5 We will issue appropriate 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) based on our final 

results. 

Final Rate for Non-Examined 

Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ However, in 

this administrative review, there are no 

individually investigated companies 

receiving calculated dumping margins. 

Accordingly, because we have no 

companies in the instant review for 

which we are calculating a rate that can 

be applied to the non-selected 

companies,6 for the final results of 

review, we have determined to apply a 

rate of 7.89 percent to the non-selected 

respondents, which is the weightedaverage dumping margin determined 

and assigned to the non-selected 

respondents in the previous (fifth) 

administrative review of the Order.7


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices 13701 

2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

8See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 61132. 

9See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

10For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

11See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 76966, 76969 

(December 23, 2014). 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the non-selected respondents 

for the POR, February 1, 2020, through 

January 31, 2021: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic 

Technology Co. Ltd ................. 7.89 

Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd 7.89 

Kyocera Mexicana S.A. de C.V .. 7.89 

Sunrise Energy Co. Ltd .............. 7.89 

Disclosure 

As noted above, no party commented 

on the Preliminary Results. As a result, 

we have not modified our analysis from 

the Preliminary Results and will not 

issue a decision memorandum to 

accompany this Federal Register notice. 

We are adopting the Preliminary Results 

as the final results of this review. 

Further, because we have not changed 

our calculations since the Preliminary 

Results, there are no new calculations to 

disclose in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b) for these final results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. In 

accordance with the Preliminary 

Results, we determined that no 

companies in this review had 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise upon which to calculate a 

dumping margin.8

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at an ad valorem rate equal to the 

non-selected rate determined in the 

previous administrative review. The 

final results of this review shall be the 

basis for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.9

For entries of subject merchandise 

produced during the POR by the 16 

companies that had no shipments 

during the POR, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(-ies) involved in 

the transaction.10

Commerce intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions to 

CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for all remaining 

companies in this review will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin of 7.89 percent that was 

established in the final results of the 

previous administrative review; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not covered in this review, 

including the companies which 

Commerce has determined had no 

shipments in these final results, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the companies 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the producer is, then 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) if neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer is a firm covered in this or 

any previous review or the LTFV 

investigation, the cash deposit rate for 

all other producers or exporters will 

continue to be 19.50 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.11 The cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: March 3, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05070 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–871] 

Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From 

India: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review did not make 

sales of finished carbon steel flanges 

from India at prices below normal value 

during the period of review (POR), 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES