alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
GA FINANCIAL, INC.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GA Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
V. Dionise, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ James V. Dionise
-------------------------------------
James V. Dionise
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GA Financial, Inc. and will be retained by GA Financial, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6701 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for 

inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Mr. LAWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

and adjust for inflation the above-the-line deduction for 

teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EX4 PENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY 

5 SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$250’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘$600’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 62(d)(3) 

10 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6701 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’, 

2 (2) by striking ‘‘$250’’ and inserting ‘‘$600’’, 

3 and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘calendar year 2014’’ and in5 serting ‘‘calendar year 2022’’. 

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years begin8 ning after December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Samuel Kwame AMANKRAH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. F. X. CHAVEZ, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 11-57060

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 20, 2017

Samuel Kwame Amankrah, Pro Se

Andrew Mestman, Neru Joy Utomi, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Kevin Vienna, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, AGCA — Office of the Attorney General (San Diego), San Diego, CA, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Samuel Kwame Amankrah appeals pro se from the district court s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the denial of a habeas corpus petition, *see Fairbank v. Ayers,*650 F.3d 1243, 1250 (9th Cir. 2011), and we affirm.

Amankrah argues that the prosecutor made several remarks during closing argument that violated Amankrah’s Fifth Amendment right not to testify under *Griffin v. California,*380 U.S. 609, 615, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed,2d 106 (1965). The California Court of Appeal analyzed the prosecutor’s entire closing argument and concluded that two of the comments were improper, but that the *Griffin*error was harmless under *Chapman v. California,*386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). The state court’s rejection of Amankrah’s claim was not contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, either *Griffin*or *Chapman,*nor an unreasonable determination of facts based on the evidence presented. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); *see also Davis v. Ayala,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2187, 2199, 192 L.Ed.2d 323 (2015). Moreover, given the significant evidence of his guilt at trial, Amankrah has not shown that the prosecutor’s remarks had a “substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.” *Brecht v. Abrahamson,*507 U.S. 619, 637, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (internal quotations omitted); *see also Davis,*135 S.Ct. at 2198.

Amankrah’s motion to present late new evidence is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX-33 (o)

                      MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION ON COMPLIANCE
                           WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA

                                February 26, 2007

     SunTrust Bank (the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section
229.1122(d)(2)(i), 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") (the  "Applicable  Servicing  Criteria"), for
securitization transactions serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. occurring after
December 31, 2005 (the "Platform"). The Asserting Party is not assessing
compliance with any other criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the CFR.

     The Asserting Party used the applicable criteria in paragraph (d) of Title
17, Section 229.1122 of the CFR to assess compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

     The Asserting Party has concluded that is has complied, in all material
respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the twelve month
period ending December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period").

     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this
assertion.


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Sections 229.1122(d)(4)(i) and 229.1122(d)(4)(ii)


By: /s/  Rosealma T. Burton    2/26/07
----------------------------
Name:   Rosealma T. Burton
Title:   First Vice President


SUNTRUST BANK
Solely with respect to Section 229.1122(d)(2)(i)

By: /s/ Tomas E. Suarez        2/26/07
-----------------------
Name:    Tomas E. Suarez
Title:   Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4156

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHANIYRUS S. BOGLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (CR-04-231)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 27, 2005

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank W. Dunham, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Amy L. Austin,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Brian L.

Whisler, Michael S. Dry, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Bogle does not seek to challenge his sentence. Thus, United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), does not impact this

appeal.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Shaniyrus S. Bogle appeals his convictions for possession

with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841 (2000), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug

trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000).*

Bogle entered a guilty plea conditioned on his ability to appeal

the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence.

Finding no error, we affirm.

Bogle argues that the district court erred in denying his

motion to suppress. This court reviews the factual findings

underlying a motion to suppress for clear error, and the district

court’s legal determinations de novo. See Ornelas v. United

States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996). When a suppression motion has

been denied, this court reviews the evidence in the light most

favorable to the government. See United States v. Seidman, 156

F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1998).

With these standards in mind, and having reviewed the

record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the officer who

seized Bogle did so based on a reasonable articulable suspicion

that Bogle was engaged in criminal activity. “[A]n officer may,

consistent with the Fourth Amendment, conduct a brief,

investigatory stop when the officer has a reasonable, articulable
- 3 -

suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.” Illinois v. Wardlow,

528 U.S. 119, 123 (2000); see also Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30

(1968). We conclude that, given the totality of the circumstances,

see United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 8 (1989), Bogle’s

suspicious and evasive behavior justified the officer’s actions.

See United States v. Mayo, 361 F.3d 802, 807-08 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we affirm Bogle’s conviction and sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7068 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7068

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for the scheduling of 
    tianeptine as a schedule III substance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2024

  Mr. Panetta (for himself and Mr. Pfluger) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
   in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for the scheduling of 
    tianeptine as a schedule III substance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scheduling Tianeptine and Analogues 
Now to Defend Against Emerging Opioids Act'' or the ``STAND Against 
Emerging Opioids Act''.

SEC. 2. SCHEDULING OF TIANEPTINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act 
(21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended by adding at the end of schedule III the 
following:
    ``(f) Tianeptine, including its analogues, salts, isomers, and 
salts of isomers.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
become effective on the date that is 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ESTECH SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor

______________________

2023

- 1242

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021

- 00574.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J OHN W ITTENZELLNER

, Williams Simons & LandisPLLC, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellant. Also represented by F RED W ILLIAMS , Austin, TX.

M ICHAEL S. F ORMAN

, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, Case: 23-1242 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2024argued for intervenor. Also represented by P ETER J. A YERS

, W ILLIAM L A M ARCA

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, L INN

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 11 , 2024
Date Case: 23-1242 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 09/11/2024
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym
Corporation. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Kim Mayyasi, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                               
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ KIM MAYYASI                               
|                    |  | Kim Mayyasi President, Chief Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,058,424
<SECURITIES>                                18,580,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,851,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,501
<INVENTORY>                                      4,126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,876,974
<PP&E>                                       3,284,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 744,583
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,714,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,297,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        74,771
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,258,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,714,054
<SALES>                                     46,656,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,656,248
<CGS>                                       33,865,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,865,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,991,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,214,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,777,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,777,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,074,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,982,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                    55,175
<INVENTORY>                                  1,144,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,641,052
<PP&E>                                      34,138,377
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,481,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             143,171,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,184,057
<BONDS>                                     59,945,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,098
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,795,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               143,171,743
<SALES>                                    113,388,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           113,388,685
<CGS>                                       77,532,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,532,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,525,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,457,636
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,250,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,946,390
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,303,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,303,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**




**AGGREGATE
      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO
      CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**




Class
                
                Interest
                
                Principal
                
                Losses
                
                Ending
                    BalanceA-1
                
                
                1,217,006.60
                
                
                9,661,100.46
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                210,782,899.54A-2
                
                
                79,062.04
                
                
                627,627.06
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                13,693,372.94A-R
                
                
                0.55
                
                
                100.00
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                0.00B-1
                
                
                42,791.00
                
                
                801.27
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                7,750,198.73B-2
                
                
                13,801.77
                
                
                258.44
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                2,499,741.56B-3
                
                
                10,351.32
                
                
                193.83
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                1,874,806.17B-4
                
                
                6,900.88
                
                
                129.22
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                1,249,870.78B-5
                
                
                5,520.71
                
                
                103.38
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                999,896.62B-6
                
                
                4,835.19
                
                
                90.54
                
                
                0.00
                
                
                875,738.17
----

|   | 1. | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael Katz              |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Michael Katz                  |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
| Dated: March 22, 2011         |   |

|   | 1. | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Roger Clark               |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Roger Clark                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer       |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
| Dated: March 22, 2011         |   |

----
II

Calendar No. 313

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 680

[Report No. 104–211]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of

documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

JANUARY 26, 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, and

6 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of
2

S 680 RS

1 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

2 with a coastwise endorsement for the vessel YES DEAR,

3 United States official number 578550.

Calendar No. 313

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 680

[Report No. 104–211]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

DEAR.wise trade endorsement for the vessel YESissue a certificate of documentation and coastJANUARY 26, 1996

Reported without amendment