alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A-1                    7,427,009.03       7,862,240.37         0.00        195,637,759.63
A-2                   26,116,155.59               0.00         0.00        673,747,967.00
B                      1,873,271.95               0.00         0.00         47,260,093.00
C                      2,512,582.93               0.00         0.00         62,028,874.00
D                        608,399.82               0.00         0.00         14,768,779.00
E                      1,762,934.73               0.00         0.00         41,352,582.00
F                        755,543.44               0.00         0.00         17,722,535.00
G                      1,435,279.23               0.00         0.00         41,352,582.00
H                        410,079.81               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
IO                     5,651,994.27               0.00         0.00                  0.00
J                        410,079.74               0.00         0.00         11,815,023.00
K                        410,079.81               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
L                        410,079.74               0.00         0.00         11,815,023.00
M                        410,079.81               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
N                        717,598.83               0.00         0.00         20,676,291.00
R-I                            0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R-II                           0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R-III                          0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Skylyft Media Network, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Yanke, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard Yanke Richard Yanke

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

September 2, 2008

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             319
<SECURITIES>                                       597
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                      3,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,225
<PP&E>                                           2,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,772
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,107
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,919
<SALES>                                         10,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,773
<CGS>                                            6,245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
NMFL # 14013 04/04                                                                                                                                                                                               Wells Fargo Home Mortgage                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   is a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A Exhibit 35.1 **Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.****Servicer Compliance Statement**1.  I, John B. Brown, Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") hereby state that a review of the activities of Wells Fargo during the calendar year 2006 and of Wells Fargo's performance under the servicing agreement(s) listed on the attached Exhibit A (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision. 2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement (s) in all material respects throughout 2006. /s/ John B. Brown John B. Brown Senior Vice President Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. NMFL # 14013 04/04                                                                                                                                                                                               Wells Fargo Home Mortgage                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   is a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A EXHIBIT A CLIENT  INV# INV MASTER SERVICER/TRUSTEE DEAL NAME 106 G75 GOLDMAN US BANK NCAMT 2006-ALT2
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 689

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act regarding the use of organic sorbents

in landfills, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act regarding the use

of organic sorbents in landfills, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Landfill Technological

5 Improvement Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. USE OF ORGANIC SORBENTS.

7 Section 3004(c)(2) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act

8 (42 U.S.C. 6924(c)(2)) is amended—
2

•S 689 IS

1 (1) in the first sentence following subparagraph

2 (B) by striking ‘‘during’’ and inserting ‘‘in the an3 aerobic environment of’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Until

5 such time as the Administrator issues final regula6 tions concerning anaerobic landfill conditions and

7 the use of organic sorbents in landfills, regulations

8 implementing subparagraph (B) shall not prohibit

9 the use in a hazardous waste landfill of a sorbent

10 that is manufactured from processed organic mate11 rial and is not likely to degrade in an anaerobic envi12 ronment.’’.

Æ
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

$£00jll-E-169 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:10 AM Sheet 209 of 264 
P.2 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Contact Report 

Melanie Proctor, 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

July 16,1998 

Mr. Robert DeGraff and Mr. Daniel Helman 

A 94 52 

ll-£-/M 

& 

Contact: Mr. Robert DeGraff and Mr. Daniel Helman 

Company: Werner Company, Franklin Park, TX. 

Telephone Number: (847)455-9450 

Fax Number: (847)455-9458 

PAGE 1 - 2 & 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Helman explained that the mixing vessels at their Franklin Park facility are covered 

by a dome that is attached to the outer sleeve of the mixing shaft He added that no visible gaps 

are present in the mixing vessel cover during actual mixing operations. Mi. ILJIHJUU IUJU uinle#- J^ 

Miip hi tha BOVW far addimjqatwiali tint their opt ninpr itn B rVurtfcdacmy- ^^ 

Mr. Helman also pointed out that occasionally small amounts of resin may be mixed 

manually in buckets which have no covers. But he confirmed that all of their mechanical mixing 

operations are covered. 

»K o « *«•«'> -f*l< 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE fl X*A^~C&L~S{/J\+ 

fry /*rki Al «/-
P.3 

WERNER 

10800 W. BELMONT AVENUE FRANKLIN PARK (847) 455-9450 

FRANKLIN PARK, TL 60131.0448 FAX (847) 455-9465 

FACSIMILE (TELEFAX) NUMBER: 1 (847) 455-9465 

DATE: ^ -I A ^S TIME: 

SEND TO: 

COMPANY r*«•/*'*• ^v n J<yv^, A < 

ATTENTION 

FACSIMILE NUMBER f/ 9 ^^/ Z " & *-3y 

SENT BY: 

NAME: r\(fL4^ TM.«J__l_l___ 

NUMBER OF PAGES (FOLLOWING THIS COVER SHEET) ___________ 

MESSAGE . ^ £«ryc^fc ^ 'C^K^Vx«T7i». /c ^ /^.^^ggw«, T 

;,ivi -?>.u^5 

IF ANY COPIES ARE UNCLEAR OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY 

PHONE: 1 (847) 455-9450 or FAX: 1 (847) 455-9465 

OPERATOR 

^
From: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:44 PM

To: Terry Schimmel (Bricks

- Phenix City)

Cc: Fruh.Steve@epamail.epa.gov; Marinshaw, Richard; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: Re: Brick Industry Association MACT Data Collection

Terry,

Thanks for forwarding this information.

You are welcome to submit hard copy with a CD ROM, but it isn't necessary as email correspondence is

also part of the official record.

Please confirm that non of t he information is considered to be CBI.

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243

- 02)

RTP, NC 27711

919

- 541

- 5427

919

- 541

- 5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243

- 02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709

From: "Terry Schimmel (Bricks

– Phenix City)" Terry.Schimmel@boral.com

Sent: 10/17/2008 02:48 PM

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc:

Subject: Brick Industry Association MACT Data Collection

Jeff,

Attached please find electronic files of a letter as well as an undated spreadsheet based on the new data

we have collected. Please acknowledge receipt of this email as well as letting me know if you need for

me to follow up with either a CD, hard copy or both. You probably need to give me a little guidance on

the proper protocol to use here in submitting this information formally.Thanks,

Terry

(See attached file: Initial Data Submittal to EPA.pdf)

(See attached file: Summary Table

- for EPA.xlsx.tg.zip)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-143179, 333-149973, and 333-158224 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-163811 on Form S-3/A of our reports dated March 16, 2011, relating to the financial statements of U.S. Auto PartsNetwork, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. and subsidiaries for theperiod ended January 1, 2011. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, CA 

March 16, 2011
EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 13, 2007

Mortgage Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc.
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust
    2006-AM3

Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 10/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Trust Administrator), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of a SubServicer, has been
     made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of a Sub-Servicer, in all material
     respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
     failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying
     each such failure known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
----- F o r wa r ded b y B r i an S h r a g e r / R T P / U S E PA

/ U S on 02 / 18 / 2011 03 : 07 PM

-----

F r o m: Br ian S h r age r / R T P / U SE P A

/ US

T o: " Higgi n s

, Co r t n e y " < Co r t ne y _Hi g gin s @ o m b

. eop

. go v> C c: J i m E dd i nge r / R T P / U SEP A

/ U S @ E PA
Da t e: 02 / 09 / 2011 10 : 00 AM
S ubje c t: F w : T e s t ing and M oni t o r ing Co s t De t ai l s b y S u b c a t eg o ry

Co r t ne y,

P e r y o u r r eq u e s t, a t t a c hed a r e t h e t e s t ing and m oni t o r ing c o s t s b r o k en

ou t b y s ub c a t ego ry and c on t r ol (m on i t o r i ng o nl y)

. T he c on t r ol c o s t s a re b r o k en ou t in A pp e ndi x A- 1 t o t he I m p a c t s M e m o ( whi c h I ' v e p r o v id ed

aga i n s in c e i t i s n o t a la r ge f i le ).

T h an k s!

Br ian

(S ee a t t a c hed f ile : T e s t ingCo s t De t a il s f o r O MB 0 20711

. x l s x)(S ee a t t a c hed
f ile : I m pa c t s A ppen d i x A- 1 t o A- 3

. x l sx)
#### IN RE: Yousif H. HALLOUM, Debtor. Yousif H. Halloum, Appellant, v. McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth; Hilton A. Ryder, U.S. Trustee, Appellees.

No. 16-60059

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 21, 2017

Yousif H. Halloum, Pro Se

Scott M. Reddie, McCormick Barstow Sheppard Wayte & Carruth, Fresno, CA, for Appellees

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges,

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Halloum’s request for oral argument, set forth in his reply brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Yousif Halloum appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order allowing fees and expenses to Hall-oum’s former counsel, and the BAP’s order denying rehearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We independently review the bankruptcy court’s decision, *see Law Offices of David A. Boone v. Derham-Burk (In re Eliapo),*468 F.3d 592, 596 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees to Halloum’s *545former counsel on the basis of the parties’ retainer agreement, because counsel testified that Halloum had signed the agreement and that the parties did not enter into a flat fee arrangement. *See Stahl v. Simon (In re Adamson Apparel, Inc.),*785 F.3d 1285, 1291 (9th Cir. 2015) (“Clear error exists when, although there is evidence to support the lower court’s conclusion,-the reviewing court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as without merit Halloum’s arguments that the BAP and the bankruptcy court violated his due process rights'.

Halloum’s motion to file an oversize reply brief (Docket No. 18) is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10427

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2017*

Filed July 17, 2017

Matthew Gould Morris, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USSAC—Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Noa Eva Oren, FPDCA—Federal Public Defender’s Office (Sacramento), Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Bailey appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 151-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for receipt and distribution of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Bailey argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his request for a downward variance or departure under U.S.S.G. § 5H1.4 to reflect his health problems and traumatic brain injury. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the district court considered Bailey’s sentencing arguments, specifically noted his age and poor health, and adequately explained the low-end sentence. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Bailey also contends that his within-Guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his mitigating factors and the fact that, in his view, the Guidelines overinflate the sentencing ranges for child pornography offenses. The district court did not abuse its discretion. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the videos Bailey collected and his admitted “sexting” with minor girls.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Adriana PARRA, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent

2016-1797

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 2017

Raymond D. Martinez, Martinez & Martinez Law Firm, PLLC, El Paso, TX, argued for petitioner.

Domenique Grace Kirchner, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Elizabeth M. Hosford.

(Reyna, Linn, and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Order entered June 17 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01606 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01607 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01608 - CR JOE LEWIS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F13 - 41242 - X , F13 - 41243 - X, F13 - 41244 - X 

### O RDER The Court REINSTATES the appeals. On May 20, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed. We also ordered the trial court to prepare and file completed certifications of appellant’s right to appeal for the cases. On June 16, 2015, we received the reporter’s record, but we have not yet received the certifications of appellant’s right to appeal. Accordingly, w e VACATE the May 20, 2015 order to the extent it requires findings regarding the reporter’s record. We ORDER the trial court to prepare certifications of appellant’s right to appeal for these cases that accurately reflect the trial court proceedings. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a), (d);Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The completed certifications are due

within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. We DENY appellant’s June 1 , 2015 pro se motion to file a brief. Appellant is represe nted by counsel and is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State , 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981). Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6925 

To amend the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act to permanently authorize the Every Kid Outdoors program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2024 

Ms. PORTER (for herself and Ms. DEGETTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act to permanently authorize the 

Every Kid Outdoors program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Every Kid Outdoors 

5 Reauthorization Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6925 IH

1 SEC. 2. EVERY KID OUTDOORS REAUTHORIZATION. 

2 Section 9001 of the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conserva3 tion, Management, and Recreation Act (Public Law 116– 

4 9; 16 U.S.C. 6804 note) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(5), by striking ‘‘or home6 schooled learner 10’’ and inserting ‘‘or fifth grader 

7 or home-schooled learner who is 10 or 11’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (b)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘during 

9 the period beginning on September 1 and ending on 

10 August 31 of the following year’’ and inserting ‘‘for 

11 a 12-month period that begins on a date determined 

12 by the Secretaries’’; 

13 (3) in the heading for subsection (b)(2)(C), by 

14 striking ‘‘IN GRADE FOUR’’; and 

15 (4) in subsection (b), by amending paragraph 

16 (5) to read as follows: 

17 ‘‘(5) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

18 There is authorized to be appropriated for use by 

19 the Secretaries in carrying out paragraph (3), 

20 $25,000,000 for each fiscal year to— 

21 ‘‘(A) provide operational and staff support 

22 for the program, including coordination for the 

23 National Park Service to provide operational 

24 and staff support in carrying out the activities 

25 of the program; 

3 

•HR 6925 IH

1 ‘‘(B) promote the program and distribute 

2 resources related to the program to schools, 

3 youth-serving organizations, parents, and care4 givers; 

5 ‘‘(C) provide transportation services re6 lated to the program to schools and youth-serv7 ing organizations with the greatest financial 

8 needs; and 

9 ‘‘(D) launch targeted outreach related to 

10 the program for underserved communities and 

11 children with disabilities.’’. 

Æ