Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices 13705 

8These companies are: Hankook Tire China Co., 

Ltd.; Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Company 

Ltd.; Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Tech Corp., Ltd.; 

Qingdao Honghuasheng Trade Co., Ltd; Qingdao 

Kapsen Trade Co.; Shandong Habilead Rubber Co., 

Ltd.; Shandong Hongsheng Rubber Technology Co., 

Ltd.; and Shandong Qilun Rubber Co., Ltd. 

9Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross owned with Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., 

Ltd.: Sumitomo Rubber (China) Co., Ltd. and 

Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co. Ltd. 

10This rate is based on the rates for the 

respondents that were selected for individual 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts available. See section 

705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

According to the CBP import data, 

eight companies subject to this review 

did not have reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR for 

which liquidation is suspended.8

Further, in response to the Preliminary 

Results, no party submitted information 

to contradict the information on the 

record. Therefore, because there is no 

evidence on the record of this segment 

of the proceeding to indicate that these 

companies had entries, exports, or sales 

of subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR, we are 

rescinding the administrative review 

with respect to these companies, 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review 

There are three companies for which 

a review was requested and not 

rescinded, and which were not selected 

as mandatory respondents. For these 

companies, we are applying the rate 

calculated for the sole mandatory 

respondent, Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) 

Co., Ltd. (Sumitomo Rubber), which is 

above de minimis and not based entirely 

on facts available. This methodology to 

establish the non-selected subsidy rate 

is consistent with our practice and uses 

section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which 

governs the calculation of the all-others 

rate in investigations, as guidance. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

POR January 1, 2019, through December 

31, 2019: 

Producer/exporter 

Subsidy rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd. 

and its cross-owned affiliates.9 ........ 24.79 

Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.10 ..................... 124.53 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the 

Following Companies 

Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd ........... 24.79 

Qingdao Landwinner Tyre Co., Ltd ..... 24.79 

Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufacture Co., Ltd ................................ 24.79 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose to interested 

parties the calculations and analysis 

performed for these final results of this 

review within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2), Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of this publication of 

the final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

With respect to the companies for 

which this administrative review is 

rescinded, countervailing duties shall be 

assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit rate required at the time of 

entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, during the period 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce also intends to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP 

will continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, 

as appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 3, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Subsidies Valuation 

V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Reverse its Decision to Countervail the 

Export Buyer’s Credit Program (EBCP) 

based on Adverse Facts Available (AFA) 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Reverse its Decision to Apply AFA in 

Finding that the Domestic Producers that 

Supplied Inputs are ‘‘Authorities’’ 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Use World Export Prices as the Tier-Two 

Benchmark Prices to Calculate the 

Alleged Input Subsidies 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust for Ocean Freight if it Continues 

to Rely on Import Prices as the Tier-One 

Benchmark for Inputs 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA on Electricity for LTAR 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA to ‘‘Other Subsidies’’ 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Treat the Assistance for Deployment of 

Trade as an Export Subsidy for SRH 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply a Separate Adverse Rate for the 

Enterprise Income Tax Law, R&D 

Program 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–05068 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–201–830] 

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 

Rod From Mexico: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
13706 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices 

1See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod 

from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Partial Recission 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 60799 (November 4, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Deacero’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy 

Steel Wire Rod from Mexico—Case Brief,’’ dated 

December 6, 2021; see also Nucor’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon 

and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: 

Case Brief,’’ dated December 6, 2021. 

3See Deacero’s Letter, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy 

Steel Wire Rod from Mexico—Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

December 13, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Carbon 

and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

5See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon 

and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, 

Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, 

and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002) 

(Order). 6See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7See 19 CFR 351.356.8(a). 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that sales of 

carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod 

(wire rod) from Mexico were made at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR), October 1, 2019, 

through September 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin A. Smith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2181. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this review in the Federal Register.1 We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. This review 

covers one mandatory respondent 

selected for individual examination, 

Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V. (Deacero). We 

received case briefs from Deacero and 

Nucor Corporation (Nucor, or the 

petitioner).2 Subsequently, we received 

a rebuttal brief from Deacero.3 A 

complete summary of the events that 

occurred since publication of the 

Preliminary Results is found in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 5

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is wire rod, in coils, of approximately 

round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, 

but less than 19.00 mm, in solid crosssectional diameter. 

A full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The issues are identified 

in the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at https://access.

trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.

aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from parties, we 

have made certain revisions to the 

margin calculation for Deacero.6 For 

detailed information, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Respondent Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

Commerce did not select Ternium 

Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Ternium) for 

individual examination. Further, 

Ternium was not the subject of a 

withdrawal of request for review; did 

not request to participate as a voluntary 

respondent; did not submit a claim of 

no shipments; and was not otherwise 

collapsed with a mandatory respondent. 

Therefore, Ternium remains a 

respondent not selected for individual 

examination. As explained in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, we have 

assigned to Ternium the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

Deacero. 

Final Results of the Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period October 1, 

2019, through September 30, 2020: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margins 

(percent) 

Deacero S.A.P.I de C.V ............. 4.64 

Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V ...... 4.64 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after publication of 

these final results in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

For Deacero, Commerce has 

calculated importer-specific 

antidumping duty assessment rates by 

aggregating the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales of 

each importer and dividing each of 

these amounts by the total entered value 

associated with those sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate without 

regard to antidumping duties any 

entries for which the importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Deacero for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. For the companies not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to apply an 

assessment rate to all entries produced 

and/or exported by those companies 

equal to the dumping margin indicated 

above. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 41 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review.7

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) For 

producers or exporters covered in this 

administrative review, the cash deposit 

rates will be the rates established in the 

final results of this administrative 

review; (2) for producers or exporters 

not covered in this administrative 

review but covered in a prior segment 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2022 / Notices 13707 

8See Order, 67 FR at 65947. 

of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the producer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 20.11 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

Dated: March 3, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Final 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Margin for Company Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VI. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Made a 

Ministerial Error Related to Currency 

Conversion 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Exclude Insurance Revenue from the 

Calculation of Deacero’s Home Market 

Credit Expenses 

Comment 3: Whether Deacero Failed to 

Report Inland Freight Expenses for Some 

U.S. Sales. 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–05069 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

United States-Mexico-Canada 

Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: 

Binational Panel Review: Notice of 

Request for Panel Review 

AGENCY: United States Section, USMCA 

Secretariat, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of USMCA Request for 

Panel Review. 

SUMMARY: A Request for Panel Review 

was filed on behalf of Evraz, Inc. NA 

with the United States Section of the 

USMCA Secretariat on March 4, 2022, 

pursuant to USMCA Article 10.12. Panel 

Review was requested of the U.S. 

Department of Commerce’s Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review (2018–2020) in 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe from 

Canada, which was published in the 

Federal Register on February 4, 2022. 

The USMCA Secretariat has assigned 

case number USA–CDA–2022–10.12–01 

to this request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vidya Desai, Acting United States 

Secretary, USMCA Secretariat, Room 

2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20230, 202–482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 

10.12 of Chapter 10 of USMCA provides 

a dispute settlement mechanism 

involving trade remedy determinations 

issued by the Government of the United 

States, the Government of Canada, and 

the Government of Mexico. Following a 

Request for Panel Review, a Binational 

Panel is composed to review the trade 

remedy determination being challenged 

and issue a binding Panel Decision. 

There are established USMCA Rules of 

Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational 

Panel Reviews), which were adopted by 

the three governments for panels 

requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of 

USMCA which requires Requests for 

Panel Review to be published in 

accordance with Rule 40. For the 

complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/ 

rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng. 

The Rules provide that: 

(a) A Party or interested person may 

challenge the final determination in 

whole or in part by filing a Complaint 

in accordance with Rule 44 no later than 

30 days after the filing of the first 

Request for Panel Review (the deadline 

for filing a Complaint is April 4, 2022); 

(b) A Party, an investigating authority 

or other interested person who does not 

file a Complaint but who intends to 

participate in the panel review shall file 

a Notice of Appearance in accordance 

with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after 

the filing of the first Request for Panel 

Review (the deadline for filing a Notice 

of Appearance is April 18, 2022); 

(c) The panel review will be limited 

to the allegations of error of fact or law, 

including challenges to the jurisdiction 

of the investigating authority, that are 

set out in the Complaints filed in the 

panel review and to the procedural and 

substantive defenses raised in the panel 

review. 

Dated: March 4, 2022. 

Garrett Peterson, 

International Trade Specialist, USMCA 

Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2022–05016 Filed 3–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–928] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2020– 

2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Comfort 

Coil Technology Sdn. Bhd. (Comfort 

Coil), the only company subject to 

review, had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review (POR), February 1, 2020, through 

January 31, 2021. 

DATES: Applicable March 10, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christopher Maciuba, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES