alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5945 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5945

 To amend title III of the Social Security Act to allow States to drug 
test applicants for unemployment compensation to ensure they are ready 
                                to work.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2016

    Mr. Brady of Texas (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
 Boustany, Mr. Tom Price of Georgia, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Reed, 
Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Holding, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. Rice 
of South Carolina, and Mr. Roskam) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title III of the Social Security Act to allow States to drug 
test applicants for unemployment compensation to ensure they are ready 
                                to work.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ready to Work Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT ALLOWING STATES TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS REGARDING 
              OCCUPATIONS THAT REGULARLY CONDUCT DRUG TESTING.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 303(l)(1)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 503(l)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by striking ``as determined 
under regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor'' and inserting ``as 
determined by the State''.
    (b) Termination of Authority of Existing Regulations.--The final 
rule issued by the Department of Labor on August 1, 2016, entitled 
``Federal-State Unemployment Compensation Program; Middle Class Tax 
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 Provision on Establishing 
Appropriate Occupations for Drug Testing of Unemployment Compensation 
Applicants'' (81 Fed. Reg. 50298), shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of 
Earnings as reported on the first quarter form 10Q and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
                                              RESTATED
</LEGEND>
                                              
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000                       
       
                                              
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Jan-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             Feb-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               May-03-1997
<CASH>                                         277,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,552,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,058,000
<PP&E>                                       5,328,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,312,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,899,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,499,000
<BONDS>                                        906,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,062,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,899,000
<SALES>                                      1,924,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,924,000
<CGS>                                        1,326,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6815 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6815

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to revise its regulations 
   to protect patients from unintended exposure to radiation during 
          nuclear medicine procedures, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2023

Mr. Griffith (for himself, Mr. Davis of North Carolina, and Mr. Cline) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to revise its regulations 
   to protect patients from unintended exposure to radiation during 
          nuclear medicine procedures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Medicine Clarification Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAL EVENT REPORTING OF UNINTENDED IRRADIATION.

    (a) Revision of Regulations Required.--Not later than 120 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission shall revise section 35.3045(a)(1) of title 10, Code of 
Federal Regulations, by adding at the end the following:
    ``(iv) A dose that is due to an extravasation and exceeds--
    ``(A) 0.5 Sv (50 rem) dose equivalent to the 5 cubic centimeter 
volume of tissue receiving the highest absorbed dose during residence 
time; or
    ``(B) 0.5 Sv (50 rem) shallow dose equivalent to the contiguous 10 
square centimeters of skin receiving the highest absorbed dose during 
residence time.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The revision required under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date that is 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### IN RE: Richard J. KOONCE, III, Petitioner.

No. 17-1295

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 22, 2017

Richard J. Koonce, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard J. Koonce, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus requesting expedited decision on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and also seeking an order granting the relief requested in his § 2255 motion. We conclude that Koonce is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has dismissed Koonce’s § 2255 motion and denied a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Koonce’s case, we deny the part of the mandamus petition complaining of delay as moot.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. U.S. Dist.*Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *United States v. Moussaoui,*333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and no other adequate remedy is available. *In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Because Koonce can pursue his claims through his § 2255 motion and appeal, the relief he seeks is not available by way of mandamus.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*789fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Christopher HATFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-3719

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 5, 2017

Filed: September 8, 2017

Angela C. Hasty, The Law Office of Angela Hasty, L.L.C., Leawood, KS, for appellant.

Bruce A. Rhoades, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Hatfield directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to drug and money-laundering offenses, pursuant to a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), essentially arguing that the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is valid and enforceable. *See United States v. Scott,*627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); *United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
#### Juan Rafael CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-72565

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

Michael Franquinha, Aguirre Law Group APC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner

Dawn S. Conrad, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Rafael Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

*611We decline Carrillo s request to remand to the BIA in light of *Matter of Avetisyan,*25 I. & N. Dec. 688 (BIA 2012), and EOIR’s subsequent policy memorandum, because Carrillo did not request administrative closure from the BIA.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7051 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to revise recidivist penalty provisions 

for child sexual exploitation offenses to uniformly account for prior military convictions, thereby ensuring parity among Federal, State, and 

military convictions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2024 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself and Ms. ROSS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to revise recidivist 

penalty provisions for child sexual exploitation offenses 

to uniformly account for prior military convictions, thereby ensuring parity among Federal, State, and military 

convictions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parity for Child Ex5 ploitation Offenders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Title 18 of the United States Code is amended— 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7051 IH

1 (1) in section 2241(c), in the second sentence, 

2 by inserting ‘‘or an offense under the Uniform Code 

3 of Military Justice’’ after ‘‘State offense’’; 

4 (2) in section 2251(e), by striking ‘‘section 920 

5 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Mili6 tary Justice), or under’’ each place it appears and 

7 inserting ‘‘the Uniform Code of Military Justice or’’; 

8 (3) in section 2252(b)— 

9 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘section 

10 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code 

11 of Military Justice), or under’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘the Uniform Code of Military Justice or’’; and 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘section 

14 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code 

15 of Military Justice), or under’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘the Uniform Code of Military Justice or’’; 

17 (4) in section 2252A(b)— 

18 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘section 

19 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code 

20 of Military Justice), or under’’ and inserting 

21 ‘‘the Uniform Code of Military Justice or’’; and 

22 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘section 

23 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code 

24 of Military Justice), or under’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘the Uniform Code of Military Justice or’’; 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7051 IH

1 (5) in section 2426(b)(1)(B), by inserting ‘‘or 

2 the Uniform Code of Military Justice’’ after ‘‘State 

3 law’’; and 

4 (6) in section 3559(e)(2)— 

5 (A) in subparagraph (B)— 

6 (i) by striking ‘‘State sex offense’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘State or Military sex offense’’; 

8 and 

9 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or the Uniform Code 

10 of Military Justice’’ after ‘‘State law’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘ or 

12 Military’’ after ‘‘State’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7097 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to conduct outreach and provide 

assistance to institutions of higher education to support training and 

internships for members of the Armed Forces and veterans, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2024 

Ms. SHERRILL (for herself, Mrs. KIGGANS of Virginia, Mr. ALLRED, Mr. 

CROW, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. KIM of New 

Jersey, Ms. NORTON, Ms. TITUS, and Ms. TOKUDA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to conduct outreach 

and provide assistance to institutions of higher education 

to support training and internships for members of the 

Armed Forces and veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘College Opportunities 

5 for Servicemembers Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7097 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRAINING AND EDUCATION FOR TRANSITIONING 

2 MEMBERS THROUGH INSTITUTIONS OF HIGH3 ER EDUCATION. 

4 (a) SKILLBRIDGE.—The Secretary of Defense may 

5 conduct outreach to institutions of higher education in 

6 order to enter into more agreements with such institutions 

7 that may provide training or internships to members of 

8 the Armed Forces pursuant to the Skillbridge program es9 tablished under section 1143(e) of title 10, United States 

10 Code. 

11 (b) CENTERS FOR MILITARY AND VETERANS EDU12 CATION.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct outreach 

13 and provide assistance to institutions of higher education 

14 to support the creation of centers at such institutions 

15 through which members of the Armed Forces eligible for 

16 Skillbridge and veterans may receive job training. 

17 (c) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION DE18 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘institution of higher 

19 education’’ means an institution described in section 

20 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

21 1001(a)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Order filed June 3, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00556

- CR

____________ COLLIN TERRELL LOVET T , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #3 & Probate Court

Brazoria County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. 188056



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's E xhibits # 3 and # 4 .
The clerk of the County Court at Law #3 & Probate Court is directed to deliver to the
Clerk of this court the original of State's E xhibits # 3 and # 4 on or before June 10, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices o f this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's exhibits # 3 and # 4 to the clerk of the County Court at Law #3 & Probate
Court.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Blink Couture, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
      hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 (the "Form
      10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 21, 2008





*/s/
                Thomas W. Colligan*Thomas
                W. ColliganPrincipal
                Executive Officer and Principal
              Accounting
                Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 18, 2020

No. 04-19-00836-CV

Al SUAREZ, as Mayor of the City of Converse; Jeff Beehler, as Place 5 Member, City Counsel 

of the City of Converse; Kathy Richel as place 1 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; 

Shawn Russell, as Place 3 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; Marc Gilbert, as Place 

6 Member, City Counsel of the City of Converse; Le Ann Piatt, as City Manager of the City of 

Converse; Holly Nagy, as Secretary of the City of Converse and City of Converse,

Appellants

v.

Katherine SILVAS,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI22419

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 12, 2020, appellee filed a second unopposed motion for a six-day extension 

of time to file appellee’s brief. The unopposed motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that 

appellee’s motion is due no later than February 18, 2020.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0744 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0744

**2001/744/EC: Commission Decision of 17 October 2001 amending Annex V to Council Directive 1999/30/EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 3091) **

*
Official Journal L 278 , 23/10/2001 P. 0035 - 0036 *

Commission Decision

of 17 October 2001

amending Annex V to Council Directive 1999/30/EC relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air

(notified under document number C(2001) 3091)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/744/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 June 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air(1), and in particular Article 7(7) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air are laid down in Directive 1999/30/EC.

(2) The method of determining the upper and lower assessment thresholds of those pollutants laid down in that Directive should be amended in order to clarify the calculation procedure.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee instituted by Article 12(2) of Council Directive 96/62/EC(2),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Section II of Annex V to Directive 1999/30/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 October 2001.

For the Commission

Margot Wallström

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 163, 29.6.1999, p. 41.

(2) OJ L 296, 21.11.1996, p. 55.

ANNEX

"II. Determination of exceedances of upper and lower assessment thresholds

Exceedances of upper and lower assessment thresholds must be determined on the basis of concentrations during the previous five years where sufficient data are available. An assessment threshold will be deemed to have been exceeded if it has been exceeded during at least three separate years out of those previous five years.

Where fewer than five years' data are available Member States may combine measurement campaigns of short duration during the period of the year and at locations likely to be typical of the highest pollution levels with results obtained from information from emission inventories and modelling to determine exceedances of the upper and lower assessment thresholds."