alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|    |                                                                                                                         |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TravelCenters of America LLC; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |
| Date: May 17, 2017 | /s/ THOMAS M. O'BRIEN |
|                    | Thomas M. O'Brien |
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03198]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, February 18, 2022, 12:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place by telephone and is open to the public 
by telephone: 888-204-4520, Conference ID #: 1292275.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-7700; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e79792858b8e84868181868e9594a79294848495c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="027277606e6b61636464636b70714277716161702c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month of 
January. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted 
real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access 
CART (in English) on Friday, February 18, 2022, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-
only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not 
an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released 
Reports and Memorandums
    B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    C. Discussion and Vote to Appoint Raul (Danny) Vargas as interim 
Chair of the Virginia Advisory Committee
    D. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

     Dated: February 10, 2022.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-03198 Filed 2-11-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael A. Reisner, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Chief Financial
Officer of ICON Capital Corp., the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with
the Annual Report of ICON Income Fund Twelve, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”) certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and





2.   The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the LLC.





Date:March31,
2008








/s/Michael A.
Reisner


Michael
A. Reisner


Co-Chief
Executive Officer, Co-President, and Chief Financial Officer


ICON
Capital Corp.


Manager
of ICON Leasing Fund Twelve, LLC
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the “Trustee”), as Trustee in respect of the CorTS Trust VI For IBM Debentures (the “Trust”), does hereby certify that: 

1.        The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. 

2.        The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. 

3.        This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. 

4.        A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2009 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

5.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2010. 

 

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Balance Sheet/Income Statement and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,510,967
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,711,853
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 53,657,204
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    251,590,159
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,601,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             331,124,031
<DEPOSITS>                                 246,397,519
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,197,775
<LONG-TERM>                                 21,342,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<COMMON>                                        40,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,146,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             331,124,031
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,905,841
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,609,302
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,515,143
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,214,252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,163,495
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,351,648
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              54,853
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,529,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,491,667
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,491,667
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,221,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.71
<LOANS-NON>                                    161,628
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,150,588
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   13,048
<RECOVERIES>                                       730
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,601,688
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,601,688
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofGensym Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Lowell B. Hawkinson, Chief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/S/ LOWELL B. HAWKINSON

Dated: November 19, 2003                                                                  Lowell B. Hawkinson 

Chief Executive Officer and Principal 

Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Oscar MAZARET, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-17080 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(August 24, 2017)

Yvette Rhodes, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Daniel George, James A. Muench, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Yvette Clair Gray, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Stephen John Langs, Rosemary Cakmis, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Oscar Mazaret appeals his 37-month sentence, imposed at the low end of the advisory guideline range, after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to import heroin and cocaine into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 (an offense carrying a 20-year maximum penalty), Ma-zaret received a longer sentence than his two co-conspirators; the district court said this difference was due to Mazaret’s greater criminal history. We see no unwarranted disparity. The district court considered and rejected Mazaret’s arguments for miti*987gation in weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and did not place undue weight on his criminal history. See United States v. Kuhlman, 711 F.3d 1321, 1327 (11th Cir. 2013). Mazaret’s sentence has not been shown to be substantively unreasonable.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
COMMERCE, INC. FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         338,595
<SECURITIES>                                   235,595
<RECEIVABLES>                                  125,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               736,638
<PP&E>                                         135,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 907,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           916
<OTHER-SE>                                     739,193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   907,287
<SALES>                                        339,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               339,454
<CGS>                                           68,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,217
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

262 

CAF 12-00247 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF LILLIANNA G. 

------------------------------------------ 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

ORENA G., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR

LILLIANNA G. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Lisa Bloch

Rodwin, J.), entered January 11, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things,

transferred the guardianship and custody of the subject child to

petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law §

384-b, respondent mother appeals from an order that, inter alia,

terminated her parental rights with respect to the subject child and

ordered that the child be freed for adoption. Contrary to the

mother’s contention, petitioner established “by clear and convincing

evidence that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the

relationship between [the mother] and the child” (Matter of Ja-Nathan

F., 309 AD2d 1152, 1152; see Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g] [i];

[7] [a]; see generally Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 142). 

Furthermore, “Family Court properly determined that the child is a

neglected child based upon the derivative evidence that [three] of the

mother’s other children were determined to be neglected children . . 

. , including the evidence that [the mother] had failed to address the

mental health issues that led to those neglect determinations and the

placement of the custody of those children” in a foster home (Matter

of Sophia M.G.-K. [Tracy G.-K.], 84 AD3d 1746, 1746-1747 [internal

quotation marks omitted]).

Contrary to the mother’s further contention, the court properly

denied her request for a suspended judgment. A suspended judgment, as
-2- 262 

CAF 12-00247 

provided for in section 633 of the Family Court Act, “is a brief grace

period designed to prepare the parent to be reunited with the child”

(Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 311; see Matter of Baron C., 101

AD3d 1622, 1622; see also Matter of Ada M.R., 306 AD2d 920, 920-921,

lv denied 100 NY2d 509). “The court’s assessment that [the mother]

was not likely to change [her] behavior is entitled to great

deference” (Matter of Philip D., 266 AD2d 909, 909; see Matter of Jane

H. [Susan H.], 85 AD3d 1586, 1587, lv denied 17 NY3d 709).

We have considered the mother’s remaining contentions and

conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: March 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John WATSON, Jr., Respondent-Appellant.

No. 16-6955

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 13, 2017

Decided: May 23, 2017

*739Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Diana H. Pereira, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, First Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s judgment ordering Watson to be committed to the care and custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2012). We affirm.

A person may be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for medical, psychiatric, or psychological care or treatment “[i]f, after [a] hearing, the [district] court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d). The district court’s finding in this regard is a factual determination we will not overturn unless it is clearly erroneous. *United States v. LeClair,*338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2003); *United States v. Cox,*964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992). “[CJlear and convincing has been defined as evidence of such weight that it produces in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction, without hesitancy, as to the truth of the allegations sought to be established, and, as well, as evidence that proves the facts at issue to be highly probable.” *United States v. Hall,*664 F.3d 456, 461 (4th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted). “A finding is clearly erroneous when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” *Id.*at 462 (internal quotation marks omitted).

We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court’s finding that the Government showed by clear and convincing evidence that Watson was “suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another” is not clearly erroneous'. *See*§ 4246(d). Among the factors supporting the court’s finding are Watson’s history of violent conduct, including use of a firearm, which appears directly related to his mental illness; his lack of insight into his illness and the refusal to accept treatment; and the lack of family or social support if he is released.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JUSTIN HALL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3570

[October 20, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 from the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Anne Scherer,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-15811CF10A.

Justin Hall, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 152 ) ll-K-(B)-15 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 152 of 325P. 2


### ENERG Y AN D 

# EiwmoixiMEixnA L ANALYSIS , INC . 165 5 NORT

H POR T MYE RDRIV E ARLINGTON, VIRGINI A 2220 9 703/528-190 0 

# A-83-2 7

Septembe r 12 , 1984 ) n . K<B>15 l

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Subject : EP AContrac t No . 68-02-3564 , Wor k Assignmen t #1 9 Dea r Robert : Attache d ar e additiona l revision s t o summar ytable s fo r Appendi x J o f th e Augus t 30 , 198 4 draf t o f th e Leve l I Option s Briefing Packag e fo r industria l boile r SO . NSPS . Th e attache d table s reflec t IFCA M result s assuming (1 ) 0. 3 lb S0_/MMBt u ceiling emissio n standard fo r residua l fue l oi l combustio n i n newboiler s large r than 10 0 MMBtu/h r wit hannua l capacit yutilizatio n rate s large r than 3 0 percent , (2 ) minimu m5 0 per cen t S0

_

emissio n reduction , 0. 9 lb S0-/MMBt u ceiling whe n scrubbing an d 0. 8 l b 50-/MMBt u exemptio n fro mscrubbing requirement s i f the newuni t large r than 10 0 MMBtu/h r wit han annua l capacit yutilizatio n rat e les s tha n 3 0 percen t burn s residua l fue l oil , an d (3 ) minimu

m5 0 percen t SO
emissio n reductio n wit ha 0. 9 l b S0_/MMBt u emission s ceiling i f coa l i s burned . Pleas e cal l m e i f yo u hav e an yquestions . Sincerely , 

# fiy. Tim Hoga n\j TH/c e Enclosure s c c : Dr . A . Weh e

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMIC S /

ENGINEERING

### TABL E 3 SENSITIVIT YANALYSIS—NATIONA L IMPACT S LO W COAL PENETRATION

SCENARI O

S0 2 

### Emissions , 1 0 ton/yr Annualize dCosts , IO 6 

### $/y r Fue l Use , IO 1 2 

### Btu/y r o Coa l o Oi l o Ga s Cos t Effectiveness , $/ton o Averag e o Incrementa l Bas e Cas e 27 9 334 9
2 3 32 3 15 2 Coa l

Oil : 1. 7 1. 6 18 1 337 0
1 4 31 2 17 3


## 20 5 Coal : 1. 2

Oil : 0. 8 10 6 340 6
1 7 25 6 22 6 Coa l

Oil : 50%-Q. 9

0.3 a



### 32 4 47 9 53 l



### 3466 1

27 

### t 225 j 246 c



### 518 ^ 923 c



### a « 0. 3 i f C U>3 0 percent ; 0. 8 i f C U<3 0 percent . 'Revise d9/12/84 .TABL E 7 NATIONAL IMPACT S O

F REGULATORYALTERNATIVE S LO W COA L PENETRATION

SCENARI O

Baseline Alternativ

e 1 Alternativ

e 2 Alternativ

e 3 Alternativ

e 4 Alternativ

e 5 Alternativ

e 6 S0 2 3



### (lO 3 Emission s ton/yr ) 27 9 

### 146 106 89 a 

### 80 a 

### 66 a 

### 53 3 Annualize dCost s (IO 6 $/yr ) 334 9 338 6 340 6 3437 a 3442 3 3454 3 3466 3 Cos t Effect i

Average


### 27 8 32 9 463 3 467 3 493 3 518 3 venes s ($/ton )

Incrementa l

— 

### 50 0 1824 3 556 3 857 3 923 a Fue l Us e

Coa l 2 3 

### 15 1 7 3 0 3 0 2 9 2 7 (10 "

Oi l 32 3 

### 28 6 25 6 232 a 231 3 228 a 225 3 Btu/Yr )

Ga s 

### 152 19 7 22 5 23 6 23 7 24 1 246

'Revise d9/12/84 .