alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramoth JEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7563

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 4, 2017

Ramoth Jean, Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*271Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramoth Jean seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find' that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jean has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### KM ENTERPRISES, INC., an Illinois corporation, and Rodney Kris Morgan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GLOBAL TRAFFIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Global Traffic Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15865

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 15, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed March 28, 2017

*583Jana Yocom Rine, Yocom Rine Law Office, Mount Vernon, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Chad M. Drown, Calvin L. Litsey, Lauren J. Frank, James Poradek, Eva B. Stensvad, Attorney, Faegre Baker Daniels, Minneapolis, MN, Helen E. Chacon, Faegre Baker Daniels, East Palo Alto, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: FERNANDEZ, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

1. The district court did not err by granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. Defendants argued that plaintiffs’ action was barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion, based on an earlier judgment entered against plaintiffs by the District Court for the District of Minnesota. In support of that argument, defendants identified several allegations supporting plaintiffs’ claims in this case that overlapped with the allegations asserted by plaintiffs in the Minnesota case. Defendants also argued that to the extent plaintiffs had not brought the claims previously, plaintiffs could have brought their antitrust claims in the Minnesota litigation, and that this also had equivalent claim-preclusive effect. Plaintiffs did not meaningfully contest defendants’ claim preclusion arguments in their opposition to the motion to dismiss and, on their face at least, defendants’ arguments appeared meritorious.

2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiffs’ motion to alter or amend the judgment. In their motion, plaintiffs asserted for the first time a potentially valid response to defendants’ arguments that claim preclusion applied. But plaintiffs offered no explanation for failing to assert that response in their opposition to the motion to dismiss. As a result, the district court was under no obligation to entertain their untimely post-judgment arguments. *See Ramona Equipment Rental, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, 755*F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir. 2014); *see also Beech Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 51*F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 1995) (appellate court has no obligation to consider arguments on appeal that could have been raised below but were not).

AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs’ motion to strike portions of defendants’ supplemental excerpts of record is DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

June 9, 2016

No. 10-16-00171-CR

IN RE HERMAN LEE KINDRED

Original Proceeding

**JUDGMENT**

	The Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Herman Lee Kindred has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court has no jurisdiction of this proceeding, the Court has determined that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be and hereby is dismissed.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
**Annual
        Statement of Compliance**
  VIA:
        EMAIL
  Morgan
        Stanley Capital I Inc.
 1585
        Broadway
 New
        York,
        New York10036
  Re:
              Morgan
                  Stanley Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-14SL (the “Trust”), Mortgage
                  Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-14SL, issued pursuant to
                  the Trust
                  Agreement dated as October 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”), between Morgan
                  Stanley Capital I Inc., as depositor (the “Depositor”), and LaSalle Bank
                  National Association, as trustee (the
“Trustee”)
  
  I,
        Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
        as Trustee hereby certify that:
  (1) A review of the activities of the Trustee during the
        preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee under the
        Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
  (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled
        all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
        such
        year or a portion thereof.
    Date: February
        1, 2007
  LaSalle
        Bank National Association, as Trustee
   /s/
        Barbara L Marik
 Barbara
        L. Marik
 First
        Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines Meeting Cancellation

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration; Department of 
Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to notify the public that the March 3, 2022, meeting 
of the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) is canceled and 
will be rescheduled. This meeting was announced in the Federal 
Register, Vol. 87, No. 20 on Monday, January 31, 2022 (FR Doc. 2022-
01848 Filed 1-28-22). Future meetings will occur in June, September, 
and December of calendar year 2022 and were announced through the same 
Federal Register notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CDR Reed Grimes, Designated Federal 
Official, ACCV, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, 
telephone: (301) 443-6634 or email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f4e4c4c594f475d5c4e21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2465676772646c7677650a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>.

Maria G. Button,
Director, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2022-04105 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended
April 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
George H. Kirby III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|/s/
    George H. Kirby III               | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|George
    H. Kirby III                   | 
|President
    and Chief Executive Officer | 



Date:
July 17, 2018



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20687-20688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7839]

Secretary of State's Determination Under the International 
Religious Freedom Act of 1998

SUMMARY: The Secretary of State designation of ``countries of 
particular concern'' for religious freedom violations.
    Pursuant to Section 408(a) of the International Religious Freedom 
Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-292), as amended (the Act), notice is hereby 
given that, on August 18, 2011, the Secretary of State, under authority 
delegated by the President, has designated each of the following as a 
``country of particular concern'' (CPC) under section 402(b) of the 
Act, for having engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations 
of religious freedom: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Saudi 
Arabia, Sudan, and Uzbekistan.
    The Secretary simultaneously designated the following Presidential 
actions for these CPCs:
    For Burma, the existing ongoing arms embargo referenced in 22 CFR 
126.1(a), pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the Act;
    For China, the existing ongoing restrictions on exports to China of 
crime control and detection instruments and equipment, under Public Law 
101-246 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1990 and 1991, 
pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the Act;

[[Page 20688]]

    For Eritrea, the existing ongoing arms embargo referenced in 22 CFR 
126.1(a), pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the Act;
    For Iran, the existing ongoing restrictions on certain imports from 
and exports to Iran, in accordance with section 103(b) of the 
Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 
2010 (Pub. L. 111-195), pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the Act;
    For North Korea, the existing ongoing restrictions to which North 
Korea is subject, pursuant to sections 402 and 409 of the Trade Act of 
1974 (the Jackson-Vanik Amendment), pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of 
the Act;
    For Saudi Arabia, a waiver to ``further the purposes of the Act,'' 
pursuant to section 407 of the Act;
    For Sudan, the restriction on making certain appropriated funds 
available for assistance to the Government of Sudan in the annual 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, currently set forth in section 7070(f) of the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117), as carried forward 
by the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Div. B, Pub. L. 
112-10) and any provision of law that is the same or substantially the 
same as this provision, pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the Act; and
    For Uzbekistan, a waiver to ``further the purposes of the Act,'' 
pursuant to section 407 of the Act.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
Victoria Alvarado,
Office Director, Office of International Religious Freedom, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-8240 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-18-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 1O-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Malcolm H. Skolnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Malcolm H. Skolnick

Malcolm H. Skolnick

Chief Executive Officer





May 15, 2007
Jeffrey M. Harper 

# D
FAA Office of Regional Counsel 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 T (425) 227-2161 

## DOCKET F (425) 227-1007

In the Matter of: 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
FAA Case No. 2012NM060014 DMS No. FAA-2013-0619 SkyWest Airlines, Inc. Honorable Richard C. Goodwin



### NOTICE OF APPEAL In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a), Complainanthereby submits Notice ofhis intentto appealthe Initial Decision ofAdministrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin, served July 16, 2015. Respectfully submitted this 22"d day ofJuly, 2015.


## yM". Harper rAAAttomey

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that the foregoingNotice ofAppeal has been served viafacsimile, electronic 

### mail and Certified Mail- Return ReceiptRequested this date, to the following: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 F (202) 366-7536 E Richard.goodwin@dot.gov Todd Emerson, Esq. SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 F (435) 634-3505 E temerson@skywest.com I hereby certifY that the foregoingNotice ofAppeal has been served via facsimile, and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 F (202) 267-1293 Dated this 22nd day ofJuly, 2015.

Notice of Appeal In the Matter of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

# .±z**~"** ' f , •" ' •i '": i

. ·.._ r
__ f""

### 7 }L./' ):..:;. I< f

. ./C.{:;

..{}\- Dana Stephenson- 1 ·-. Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 (425) 227-2007

FAA Case No. 2012NM060014, DMS No. FAA-2013-0619 Page 2 of2 Jeffrey M. Harper, FAA Attorney T (425) 227-2161 F (425) 227-1007
# L_2004172DE.01000903.xml

| 6.5.2004 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 172/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2004

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 172/9

---

Berichtigung der Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 753/2002 der Kommission vom 29. April 2002 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1493/1999 des Rates hinsichtlich der Beschreibung, der Bezeichnung, der Aufmachung und des Schutzes bestimmter Weinbauerzeugnisse

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 272 vom 23. Oktober 2003
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 272 vom 23. Oktober 2003

Auf Seite 38, in der Berichtigung für die Seite 24 des
  Amtsblatts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 118 vom 4. Mai 2002:

Amtsblatts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften

anstatt:

„anstatt:

| ‚— | Baden |
| --- | --- |

‚—

Baden

| — | mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund, |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund,

| — | mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘ |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘

muss es heißen:

| ‚— | Baden






  — | mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‚—

Baden

—

mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund,

| — | mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘“ |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘“

muss es heißen:

„anstatt:

| ‚— | Baden |
| --- | --- |

‚—

Baden

| — | mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund, |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schöpfergrund,

| — | mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘ |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘

muss es heißen:

| ‚— | Baden






  — | mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schüpfergrund, |
| --- | --- | --- |

‚—

Baden

—

mit Ursprung im Taubertal und im Schüpfergrund,

| — | mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘“. |
| --- | --- |

—

mit Ursprung in den Teilgemeinden ...‘“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6904 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6904

 To direct the Secretary of State to further surge capacity to better 
    support special immigrant visa applicants who are nationals of 
                  Afghanistan, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 2023

Ms. Slotkin (for herself and Mr. Waltz) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of State to further surge capacity to better 
    support special immigrant visa applicants who are nationals of 
                  Afghanistan, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Our Afghan Partners Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA AND REFUGEE 
              APPLICANTS.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the United 
States should increase support for nationals of Afghanistan who aided 
the United States mission in Afghanistan during the past twenty years 
and are now under threat from the Taliban, specifically special 
immigrant visa applicants who are nationals of Afghanistan and 
referrals of nationals of Afghanistan to the United States Refugee 
Admissions Program, including through the Priority 2 Designation for 
nationals of Afghanistan, who remain in Afghanistan or are in third 
countries.
    (b) Requirements.--The Secretary of State, in coordination with the 
Secretary of Homeland Security and the heads of other relevant Federal 
departments and agencies, shall further surge capacity to better 
support special immigrant visa applicants who are nationals of 
Afghanistan and referrals of nationals of Afghanistan to the United 
States Refugee Admissions Program and who have been approved by the 
chief of mission, including through the Priority 2 Designation for 
nationals of Afghanistan, and reduce their application processing 
times, while ensuring strict and necessary security vetting, including, 
to the extent practicable, enabling refugee referrals to initiate 
application processes while still in Afghanistan.
    (c) Surge Capacity Described.--The term ``surge capacity'' includes 
increasing consular personnel to any embassy or consulate in the region 
processing visa applications for nationals of Afghanistan.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register: September 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 188)]
[Notices]               
[Page 60146]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29se10-105]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts

 
President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities: Meeting 
66

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities (PCAH) will be 
held on October 19, 2010, from 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The meeting will be 
held in the Crystal Room, The Willard Intercontinental, 1401 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004.
    The Committee meeting will begin with welcome, introductions, and 
announcements. Updates and discussion on recent programs and activities 
will follow. The meeting will also include a review of PCAH ongoing 
programming for youth arts and humanities learning, preservation and 
conservation, special events, and international cultural projects. The 
meeting will adjourn after discussion of other business, as necessary, 
and closing remarks.
    The President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities was 
created by Executive Order in 1982, which currently states that the 
``Committee shall advise, provide recommendations to, and assist the 
President, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment 
for the Humanities, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services on 
matters relating to the arts and the humanities.''
    Any interested persons may attend as observers, on a space 
available basis, but seating is limited. Therefore, for this meeting, 
individuals wishing to attend are advised to contact Lindsey Clark of 
the President's Committee seven (7) days in advance of the meeting at 
(202) 682-5409 or write to the Committee at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Suite 526, Washington, DC 20506. Further information with 
reference to this meeting can also be obtained from Ms. Clark at 
lhansen@pcah.gov.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 724, Washington, DC 20506, (202) 
682-5532, TDY-TDD (202) 682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the 
meeting.

     Dated: September 24, 2010.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2010-24366 Filed 9-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```