alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.651

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Sister Ann 
                          Keefe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SISTER ANN KEEFE POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sister Ann Keefe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sister Ann 
Keefe Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### AIPING TONG, Petitioner, v. Jefferson SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-70554

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 10, 2017 *

Filed October 12, 2017

Jisheng Li, Attorney, Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner

Dana Michelle Camilleri, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER, NELSON, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Aiping Tong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“U”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

We review adverse credibility determinations under the substantial evidence standard. *See Shrestha v. Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based on, among other things, inconsistencies in Tong’s testimony regarding the alleged incident giving rise to her asylum claim, discrepancies in Tong’s testimony regarding an earlier forced abortion that she omitted from her asylum application and asylum interview, and Tong’s failure to adequately explain her use of an alias. *See id.*at 1046-48 (inconsistency regarding underlying events supported adverse credibility determination under the REAL ID Act’s “totality of the circumstances” standard); *see also Zamanov v. Holder,*649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2011) (adverse credibility finding was supported where petitioner omitted material incidents from asylum application).

Because we affirm the BIA’s determination that Tong failed to establish eligibility for asylum, we affirm the denial of Tong’s application for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of Tong’s claim under CAT, because Tong failed to present any evidence beyond the testimony deemed not credible to establish that it was “more likely than not that [she] ... would be tortured if removed.” *Shrestha,*590 F.3d at 1048.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 10, 2022, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative                           ( print page 13756)                        Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), OpenJS Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Functional Software, Inc. (Sentry), San Francisco, CA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenJS Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 17, 2015, OpenJS Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 28, 2015 (80 FR 58297).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 5, 2021. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 24, 2021 (86 FR 67081).                

Suzanne Morris,

Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-05087 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Kathryn J. GILLETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GAMING ENTERTAINMENT (INDIANA) d/b/a Rising Star Casino, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-3662

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

*496Submitted * February 21, 2017

Decided May 16, 2017

Kathryn J. Gillette, Pro Se

Gregory A. Neibarger, Attorney, Jessica Elizabeth Whelan, Attorney, Bingham Greenebaum Doll, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee Gaming Entertainment

Robin L. Babbitt, Attorney, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants-Ap-pellees Indiana Gaming Company, LLC, LVGV, LLC

Jane D. Wilson, Attorney, Matthew Evan Burkhart, Attorney, Anne K. Ricchi-uto, Attorney, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee Belterra Resort, Indiana, LLC

Scott Ernest Andres, Attorney, Due Doyle Fanning & Metzger, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellee. Centaur, LLC

Michael V. Brodarick, Attorney, Lloyd & McDaniel, PLC, Louisville, KY, for Defendant-Appellee Patrick J. Kilbum

Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

*

 We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and oral argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).

ORDER

Kathryn Gillette defaulted on loans from eight casinos. Shé then sued the casinos, alleging violations of various consumer-protection laws. The district court dismissed Gillette’s claims, and she appeals.

We ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing the participation in bankruptcy of appellee RDI Caesars Riverboat Casino. After reviewing the supplemental briefs, this court has determined that the district court’s judgment of September 14, 2016, is nonfinal due to the bankruptcy of appellee RDI Caesars Riverboat Casino. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; *Maritime Elec. Co., Inc. v. United Jersey Bank,*959 F.2d 1194, 1203-09 (3d Cir. 1991). This court therefore lacks jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court has not disposed of *all*claims by *all*parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); see also *id.;*see also *Tradesman Int’l, Inc. v. Black,*724 F.3d 1004, 1006-07 (7th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
# EUR-Lex - 32002R1771 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R1771

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 1771/2002 of 3 October 2002 concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of rye issued in Regulation (EC) No 900/2002 **

*
Official Journal L 267 , 04/10/2002 P. 0020 - 0020 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1771/2002

of 3 October 2002

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of rye issued in Regulation (EC) No 900/2002

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in cereals(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1666/2000(2),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1163/2002(4), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1324/2002(5), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of rye to all third countries excluding Hungary, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 900/2002(6), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1632/2002(7).

(2) Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23 of Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award.

(3) On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 a maximum refund should not be fixed.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 27 September to 3 October 2002 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of rye issued in Regulation (EC) No 900/2002.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 October 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 October 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 181, 1.7.1992, p. 21.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 1.

(3) OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7.

(4) OJ L 170, 29.6.2002, p. 46.

(5) OJ L 194, 23.7.2002, p. 26.

(6) OJ L 142, 31.5.2002, p. 14.

(7) OJ L 247, 14.9.2002, p. 3.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of GCA I Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Membrado,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Michael M. MembradoMichael
                M. Membrado
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              August
                29, 2008
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration Statement Nos. 333-149583 and 333-163842 of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. on Form S-3; and (ii) Registration Statement No. 333-164852 of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2010 (May 21, 2010 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 21), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph indicating the financial statements of the Company were prepared from the separate records maintained by Enterprise Products Partners L.P. or affiliates and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed or the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated entity), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Houston, Texas
 May 21, 2010
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2006-7 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, EMC Mortgage
     Corporation as Servicer, EverHome Mortgage Company, as Servicer, First
     Horizon Home Loan Corporation, as Servicer, HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation,
     as Servicer, HSBC Mortgage Corporation, USA, as Servicer and MidAmerica
     Bank, FSB, as Servicer.


     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ William Augustin IV
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
Exhibit
13.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nachum Falek, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:
      June 30, 2009/s/
      NACHUM FALEKNachum
      FalekVice
      President andChief
      Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LENIST KEY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1506

[ December 30, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Daniel A. Casey , Judge; L.T. Case No.

062011CF002654A88810

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O' Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Atto rney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6815 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to revise its regulations to 

protect patients from unintended exposure to radiation during nuclear 

medicine procedures, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. GRIFFITH (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of North Carolina, and Mr. CLINE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to revise 

its regulations to protect patients from unintended exposure to radiation during nuclear medicine procedures, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Medicine Clar5 ification Act of 2023’’. 

2 

•HR 6815 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICAL EVENT REPORTING OF UNINTENDED IR2 RADIATION. 

3 (a) REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—Not 

4 later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this 

5 Act, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall revise sec6 tion 35.3045(a)(1) of title 10, Code of Federal Regula7 tions, by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(iv) A dose that is due to an extravasation and ex9 ceeds— 

10 ‘‘(A) 0.5 Sv (50 rem) dose equivalent to the 5 cubic 

11 centimeter volume of tissue receiving the highest absorbed 

12 dose during residence time; or 

13 ‘‘(B) 0.5 Sv (50 rem) shallow dose equivalent to the 

14 contiguous 10 square centimeters of skin receiving the 

15 highest absorbed dose during residence time.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The revision required under 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 18 

18 months after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
DUNCAN ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.
as of February 1, 2008
 JurisdictionName of Subsidiary
    
    
    of Formation
    
    
    Effective OwnershipAcadian Gas, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Enterprise Products Operating LLC  34%
DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.  66%Acadian Gas Pipeline System
    
    
    Texas
    
    
    TXO-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%
MCN-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%Calcasieu Gas Gathering System
    
    
    Texas
    
    
    TXO-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%
MCN-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%Cypress Gas Marketing, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%Cypress Gas Pipeline, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%DEP OLPGP, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Duncan Energy Partners L.P.  100%DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Duncan Energy Partners L.P.  99.999%
DEP OLPGP, LLC  0.001%Enterprise Lou-Tex Propylene
Pipeline L.P.
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Enterprise Products Operating LLC  33%
Propylene Pipeline Partnership L.P.  1%
DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.  66%Evangeline Gas Corp.
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Evangeline Gulf Coast Gas, LLC  45.05%
Third Parties  54.95%Evangeline Gas Pipeline Company L.P.
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Evangeline Gulf Coast Gas, LLC  45%
Evangeline Gas Corp.  10%
Third Party  45%Evangeline Gulf Coast Gas, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%MCN Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%MCN Pelican Interstate Gas, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%Mont Belvieu Caverns, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Enterprise Products Operating LLC  33.365%
Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc.  0.635%
DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.  66%Neches Pipeline System
    
    
    Texas
    
    
    TXO-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%
MCN-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%Pontchartrain Natural Gas System
    
    
    Texas
    
    
    TXO-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%
MCN-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC  50%Sabine Propylene Pipeline L.P.
    
    
    Texas
    
    
    Enterprise Products Operating LLC  33%
Propylene Pipeline Partnership L.P.  1%
DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.  66%South Texas NGL Pipeline LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Enterprise Products Operating LLC  34%
DEP Operating Partnership, L.P.  66%Tejas-Magnolia Energy, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Pontchartrain Natural Gas System  96.6%
MCN-Pelican Interstate Gas, LLC  3.4%TXO-Acadian Gas Pipeline, LLC
    
    
    Delaware
    
    
    Acadian Gas, LLC  100%
Exhibit 21 

| Subsidiaries of the Company                | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                       |                          |
| Net2Phone Global Services, L.L.C           | Delaware                      |
| Net2Phone Cable Telephony, L.L.C.          | Delaware                      |
| Net2Phone Global Servicos de Comunicacoes  | Madeira, Portugal             |
| Sprewell Consultadorio e Projectos, Lda    | Madeira, Portugal             |
| Net2Phone MEA Ltd                          | Israel                        |
| Net2Phone, B.V                             | Netherlands                   |
| Dekkam Holdings, B.V                       | Netherlands                   |
| Net2Phone America do Sul Comunicacoes Ltda | Brazil                        |
| Net2Phone do Brasil Comunicacoes Ltda      | Brazil                        |
| VoIP Technology Holdings, LLC              | Delaware                      |
|                                       |                          |

----