alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 15, 2011

Mr. Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20591

Dear Mr. Towels:

Thank you for your letter dated Oct 1, 2010 in reference to our request for an exemption from

§ 141.5(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. You stated in your letter that the relief we are seeking is now covered under the amended regulation. Because of the wording in the revised amendment, our POI and FSDO still have a problem in renewing our 141 certificate. They have instructed me to return to your office for clarification.

The revised amendment reads in pertinent part: (emphasis added)

(d) Has established a pass rate of 80 percent or higher on the first attempt for all knowledge test leading to a certificate or rati ng, practical tests leading to a certificate or rating, or end-of-course tests for an approved training course specified in appendix K of this part

.

All of the courses offered by RTC use FTD’s only. Therefore, our pilot refresher courses are part 141.57 Special Curricula and may not technically be in appendix K. RTC’s training courses contain features that achieve a level of pilot pr oficiency equivalent to the Pilot Refresher Course in appendix K. (See enclosed TCO.)

The intent of 141.5(d) is to measure the quality of training. It is also apparent that if an approved course leads to certification or a rating, then t he test must be the official FAA knowledge test or the official FAA practical test in the PTS. However, in the case where a course does not lead to a rating, there is no official FAA test. This leaves only an end of course test to measure quality from. It should also be noted that 141.5(d) uses the words for all indicating that all approved courses need to be tested under the quality of training aspect.

So could our end of course test be used to meet the requirement of 141.5(d), or do we need to continue with the exemption process?

Thank you,

John Killeen,

President

Ps. I have also included a copy of our request for exemption in case you no longer have it.

Enclosures
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 5 E0 02 2 . J ONATHAN MARCANTONI O v . SARAH MARCANTONI O.

Up o n co n s id erat i o n o f J o n at h an M arcan t o n i o ’ s e m erg en cy m o t i o n fo r an

ex t en s i o n o f t i m e i n w hi ch t o fi l e an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary r e v i e w, t h e s am e

i s h ereb y GRANTED. M o v a n t s h al l h av e u n t il Oct o b er 2 9

, 2 0 24

, t o fi l e h i s

ap p li cat io n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 

## September 25, 2024

09/25/2024
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5291670 v3

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0076

Application of

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109

(U.S.-Mexico)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0152

NOTICE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC. OF DORMANCY

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Scott L. Durgin

Vice President, Administration

Ethan Blank

Vice President and General Counsel

REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC.

8909 Purdue Road

Indianapolis, IN 46268

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

+1 202 637 4999/5659

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

Counsel for

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

February 27, 2014
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5291670 v3

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

MEXICO PROCEDURAL DOCKET

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0076

Application of

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

for an exemption pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109

(U.S.-Mexico)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0152

February 27, 2014

NOTICE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC. OF DORMANCY

The pro-rate agreement between Republic Airline Inc. (“Republic”) and Frontier

Airlines, Inc. (“Frontier”) pursuant to which Republic operated U.S.–Mexico services on

Frontier’s behalf has been discontinued. Republic will therefore no longer provide service

on the following transborder routes, and, pursuant to the condition attached to the

corresponding authority to operate service on these routes and DOT Order 2012-1-30,

Republic informs the Department that its designations on these routes are now available for

other carriers:

Denver-Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo

Denver-Puerto Vallarta

Kansas City-Puerto Vallarta

Kansas City-San Jose del Cabo

In light of the dormancy of these U.S.-Mexico services, Republic does not intend to apply for

renewal of the exemption authority for these routes granted in Docket DOT-OST-2010-

0152, which expires on May 14, 2014.
Dormancy Notice of Republic Airline Inc.

Page 2

\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5291670 v3

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Counsel for

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

cc: bob.kneisley@wnco.com; marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com;

robert.wirick@aa.com; howard.kass@aa.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com;

chris.walker@delta.com; jhill@cooley.com; jyoung@yklaw.com;

dkirstein@yklaw.com; Thomas.Ting@suncountry.com; dan.weiss@united.com;

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;

brett.kruger@dot.gov; brian.hedberg@dot.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Stephen D. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ STEPHEN D. ALLISON 
|                    |  |  |  | Stephen D. Allison     
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04585]



[[Page 12477]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4628-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Virginia; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4628-DR), dated October 26, 
2021, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on February 4, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Catharine O. 
Fan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Timothy S. Pheil as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04585 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS LEONARD WALLACE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 28 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2020, the Application to Exceed Word Count 

Limit is DENIED. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a compliant Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal within 30 days of this order, subject to any filing extensions conferred due to the 

COVID-19 pandemic. See 533 Judicial Administration Docket.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 69 

To abolish the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To abolish the Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nullify Occupational 

5 Safety and Health Administration Act’’ or the ‘‘NOSHA 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 69 IH

1 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

2 The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is 

3 repealed. The Occupational Safety and Health Adminis4 tration is abolished. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Raymond FELDMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOSCO CREDIT LLC, a foreign entity, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-56470

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 26, 2017

Raymond Feldman, Pro Se

Homan -Mobasser, Esquire, Attorney, Prober & Raphael, A Law Corporation, Woodland Hills, CA, for Defendant-Appel-lee

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Raymond Feldman appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his diversity action seeking to set aside a state court judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Owen,*519 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir. 2008). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. *Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Corp. v. McKinley,*360 F.3d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Feldman’s collateral attack on the state court judgment under the *Rooker-Peldman*doctrine because Feld-man’s action amounted to a forbidden “de facto appeal” of a prior, final state court judgment. *See Noel v. Hall,*341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003) (“It is a forbidden de facto appeal under *Rooker-Feldman*when the plaintiff in federal district court complains of a legal wrong allegedly, committed by the state court, and seeks relief from the judgment of that court.”).

We reject as without merit Feldman’s contention that he was entitled to summary judgment in his favor based on the district court’s granting of the parties’ requests for judicial notice.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F,3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Webinar Attendees: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans Meeting

Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Chapman, George N/A Consortium for Energy Efficiency 98 N Washington St. Boston MA 02114 N/A N/A Charles, John Engineering Manager Mortex Products, Inc 501 Terminal Rd Fort Worth TX 76106 800-444-6354 

Ext 274

N/A 

Edwards, Peter Principal Peter Edwards Co. 1277 Tredmore Dr. Mississauga ON L5J3V5 905-822-6524 N/A Eysie, Joe N/A Technical Energy Solutions 2401 Amherst Ct Boynton 

Beach

FL 33436 954-655-5324 N/A 

Fox, Cory N/A ICF International 7125 Thomas Edison Drive Columbia MD 21046 N/A N/A Gonzalez, Amanda Project Manager Energy-Solutions 1610 Harrison St Oakland CA 94612 510-482-4420 

x 287

510-482-442

Huckabee, Jerrylyn N/A MA Department of Energy 

Resources

100 Cambridge St. Ste. 1020

Boston MA 02114 N/A N/A 

Li, Xianglin PostDoc Fellow Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL)

1 Cyclotron Road, MS90-4000

Berkeley CA 94720 N/A N/A 

Lis, David Appliance Standards 

Program Manager

Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP)

91 Hartwell Avenue Lexington MA 02421 781-860-9177 

x 127

781-860-917

Martin, Justin N/A Allstyle Coil Company 7037 Brittmoore Rd Houston TX 77041 N/A N/A Mauer, Joanna Technical Advocacy 

Coordinator

Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP)

529 14th Street NW,Suite 600

Washington DC 20045 202-507-4034 N/A 

Menzere, Mark N/A Intertek 11112 Chessington Reston VA 20194 N/A N/A Meyers, Karen B. Director, Government 

Relations

Rheem Manufacturing Company 5600 Old Greenwood Road

P.O. Box 17010

Fort Smith AR 72917-7010 479-648-4747 479-648-612

Primiano, Austin N/A HARDI Mill Run Drive Columbus OH 43215 N/A N/A Rieke, Larry N/A N/A 4621 St. John Circle Zionsville IN 46077 N/A N/A Rocky, Bryan Director, Res. Product 

Management

Johnson Controls, Inc. 3110 N. Mead Street Wichita KS 67219 316-832-6431 316-832-659
Webinar Attendees: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnace Fans Meeting

Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Westphalen, Detlef Associate Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 S. Bedford Street

Suite 400

Burlington MA 01803-5154 781-270-8360 781-270-041

Williams, Daniel S. Associate C2E2 Strategies 1200 New Hampshire Ave. 

NW

Washington DC 20036 202-701-5031 N/A 

Wilson, Linda Environmental Scientist New York State Office of the 

Attorney General

120 Broadway New York NY 10271 212-416-8948 212-416-600

Woodford, Michael W. Vice President, 

Standards

Air-Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard,Suite 500

Arlington VA 22201 703-600-0328 703-528-381

Zakarian, Arshak N/A Energy Solutions 449 15th Street Suite 200 Oakland CA 94612 N/A N/A Zheng, Diana N/A N/A Lawrence Berkeley National 

Laboratory (LBNL)

1 Cyclotron Way Berkeley CA 94720 N/A N/A
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 651 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode 

Island, as the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 651 EH

1 SECTION 1. SISTER ANN KEEFE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Provi4 dence, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sister Ann Keefe Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 651 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostKeefe Post Office’’. Providence, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Sister Ann al Service located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 97-20948

_______________



### JOYCE RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, 

## VERSUS
ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL; DR. BRANISLAV RADOVANCEVIC; O. HOWARD FRAZIER, M.D.;

SURGICAL ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS, P.A.; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON; BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE; TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE; and EDWARD K. MASSIN, M.D., Defendants-Appellees.



## _________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________
(Opinion November 15, 1999, 5 Cir., ___ F.3d ___) (November 15, 1999)

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART,* Chief Judge King is recused and did not participate in this

matter. PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *
BY THE COURT:The internal procedures of this court require the precirculation, to all non-recused active judges, of a proposed panel opinion that will create a circuit split. Those procedures also allow any active judge to request, before the opinion is issued, a poll on whether the case should be reheard en banc after the opinion is issued. A member of the court in regular active service having requested a poll pursuant to that policy, and a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
#### Sylvester RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R.O.S.P. MEDICAL DEPT.; Dr. Miller; Sgt. Payne; Osborne, Officer; Officer Stanly, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6087

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 19, 2017

Decided: May 30, 2017

Sylvester Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia; Jessica Leigh Berdichevsky, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *821U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Richardson v. R.O.S.P. Med. Dep’t,*No. 7:15-cv-00595-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 2, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    FERNANDO SANCHEZ
|                        |  |  |  | Fernando Sanchez       
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Christopher D. Wallace, Respondent, *v.*Arthur Leary, Appellant.

(Argued May 1, 1872;

decided May 3, 1872.)

*Amasa J. Parker*for the appellant.

*James M. Smith*for the respondent.

Agree to affirm, after deducting forty dollars, with costs to-respondent, hfo opinion.

Judgment accordingly.
Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph F. Bukofski, Chief Accounting Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:      /s/Joseph F. Bukofski                             Dated:  May 14, 2003
         ---------------------
         Joseph F. Bukofski
Title:   Chief Accounting Officer



                                       19