[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13117-13127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04858]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2022 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 13117]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Farm Service Agency

7 CFR Parts 761, 762, 764, 765, 766, 768, and 785

[Docket No. FSA-2019-0005]
RIN 0560-AI43


Farm Loan Programs; Direct and Guaranteed Loan Changes, Certified 
Mediation Program, and Guaranteed Loans Maximum Interest Rates

AGENCY: Farm Service Agency, Department of Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) amends the Farm Loan Programs 
(FLP) regulations to implement certain provisions authorized by the 
Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill). This rule 
revises the provisions on FLP loan limits, allows additional 
flexibility for loan applicants to meet the required farming 
experience, provides higher guarantee rates for lenders to provide 
credit to beginning farmers and socially disadvantaged farmers, 
provides additional program benefits for veterans, provides equitable 
relief to certain borrowers, allows borrowers who have received debt 
restructuring with a write down to receive Emergency loans (EM), and 
expands those issues that are covered under the agricultural Certified 
Mediation Program. In addition to the 2018 Farm Bill changes, FSA also 
amends the regulations for loan servicing relating to accepting cash 
payments and establishing a fee for dishonored checks; these are 
discretionary changes. The result of these changes will increase loan 
limits or improve the various loan programs to relieve some 
restrictions to participation or otherwise encourage participation. 
This rule also revises the way FSA will establish the maximum interest 
rates in response to the discontinuing publication of the London 
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rates. The result of these 
changes will enable FSA to provide clearer guidance on maximum interest 
rates and allow for more consistency across all lenders participating 
in the guaranteed loan program. In addition, this rule corrects 
references to supervised credit in the regulations.

DATES:  Effective: March 9, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven K. Ford; telephone: (202) 304-
7932; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5b6b1a0b3a0abeba3aab7a1f785b0b6a1a4eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f281869784979cdc949d8096c0b287819693dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons with disabilities or who 
require alternative means for communications should contact the U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at (202) 720-2600 
(voice).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    FSA makes and services a variety of direct and guaranteed loans to 
farmers who are temporarily unable to obtain private commercial credit. 
FSA also provides credit counseling and supervision to direct loan 
borrowers, so they have a better chance for success. FSA loan 
applicants are often:
    <bullet> Beginning farmers (BF) and socially disadvantaged (SDA) 
farmers who do not qualify for conventional loans because of 
insufficient net worth; or
    <bullet> Established farmers who have suffered financial setbacks 
due to natural disasters or economic downturns.
    FSA loans are tailored to a farmer's needs and may be used to buy 
farmland and to finance agricultural production.

2018 Farm Bill Changes

    The following amendments made by this rule are non-discretionary 
and are mandated by the 2018 Farm Bill (Pub. L. 115-334). The majority 
of the changes were self-enacting and previously implemented by FSA; 
this rule updates the regulations to be consistent. The changes to the 
regulation will:
    <bullet> Modify the existing 3-year farming experience requirement 
for Direct Farm Ownership loans (FO) by including additional items as 
acceptable experience;
    <bullet> Increase the loan limit to $600,000 for Direct FOs and 
increase the loan limit to $1,750,000 for Guaranteed FOs (these are the 
base loan limit amounts as specified in the 2018 Farm Bill);
    <bullet> Increase the Direct Operating loan (OL) limit to $400,000 
and increase the Guaranteed OL limit to $1,750,000 (these are the base 
loan limit amounts as specified in the 2018 Farm Bill);
    <bullet> Allow SDA farmers and BF applicants to receive a guarantee 
equal to 95 percent, rather than the otherwise applicable 90 percent 
guarantee;
    <bullet> Expand the definition of and provide additional benefits 
for veteran farmers;
    <bullet> Provide for equitable relief to certain direct loan 
borrowers acting in good faith who have not complied with loan program 
requirements after relying on a material action, advice, or non-action 
from an FSA official;
    <bullet> Allow borrowers who have received restructuring with a 
write down to maintain eligibility for an EM; and
    <bullet> Expand the scope of eligible issues and persons covered 
under the agricultural Certified Mediation Program.
    The Guaranteed FO and Guaranteed OL limits described above are base 
amounts and have increased as a result of annual inflation adjustments 
since the 2018 Farm Bill became effective.\1\ In addition to the 2018 
Farm Bill changes, FSA is making additional discretionary policy 
changes including the removal of cash as an option for payments of FSA 
fees and loan installments and the inclusion of a fee for dishonored 
payments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The loan limit for Guaranteed FOs and OLs are adjusted 
annually based on the Prices Paid by Farmers Index that is published 
by the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. The loan 
limits specified in the 2018 Farm Bill are being included in the 
regulation to show the base amounts. If the loan limit is increased 
as a result of the annual adjustment, the new loan limit will be 
announced on the FSA web page (www.fsa.usda.gov); the loan limit 
will not be decreased based on the annual adjustment. The current 
adjusted loan limit for Guaranteed FOs and OLs is $1,825,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Throughout this rule, any reference to ``farm'' or ``farmer'' also 
includes ``ranch'' or ``rancher,'' respectively.

Farm Ownership Experience Requirement

    Section 5101 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 302(b) of the 
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (CONACT) (7 U.S.C. 1922(b)) 
to expand what can be considered when evaluating whether the applicant 
meets the existing 3-year experience requirement for Direct FOs.

[[Page 13118]]

    To qualify for a Direct FO, 7 CFR 764.152(d) states that applicants 
must have participated in the business operations of a farm for at 
least 3 out of the 10 years prior to the date the application is 
submitted.
    The authorizing legislation in 7 U.S.C. 1922(b)(1) provides FSA 
with the general authority to substitute the 3-year management 
experience requirement with other acceptable experience. Prior to this 
rule, 7 CFR 764.152(d) specified that, for all applicants, 1 of these 3 
years could be substituted with one of the following experiences:
    <bullet> Postsecondary education in agriculture business, 
horticulture, animal science, agronomy, or other agricultural related 
fields;
    <bullet> Significant business management experience; or
    <bullet> Leadership or management experience while serving in any 
branch of the military.
    Section 5101 expands these allowances, including additional 
education options, experience with another farm operation, mentorships 
in day-to-day farm management, honorable discharge from service in the 
armed forces, and similar experiences for BFs. These options address 
the different ways in which farmers can learn about managing a farm 
operation. Given the general authority under 7 U.S.C. 1922(b)(1)(iv), 
FSA chooses to allow these alternative experiences to apply to all 
farmers, not just BFs. Section 5101 also allows any two of these 
allowances to be substituted for 2 years instead of 1 year. 
Furthermore, this experience requirement may be waived altogether if 
the farmer has at least 1-year experience as hired farm labor with 
substantial management responsibilities and has a documented 
established relationship with an individual who has experience in 
farming and is a mentor with a Service Corps of Retired Executives 
(SCORE) program. In the alternative to SCORE, section 5101 allows other 
individuals or organizations that are committed to mentoring, are 
local, and approved by the Secretary, to serve as a mentor. FSA will 
approve documented mentorships on a case-by-case basis and requires 
mentors to be local individuals who are experienced farmers or farm-
related businesspersons able to provide individualized assistance to 
FSA's borrowers.
    This rule amends the eligibility requirement in Sec.  764.152(d) to 
list the alternatives that can be substituted to meet the farm 
experience requirement. These additions provide flexibility for BF 
applicants to meet FSA's Direct FO eligibility rules and access the 
credit needed to finance farm operations without compromising the 
managerial standards this requirement was designed to ensure.

FO Limits

    Section 5103 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 305 of the CONACT 
(7 U.S.C. 1925) to increase the maximum limits for the Direct and 
Guaranteed FO programs. The loan limits have increased to $600,000 for 
Direct FOs and $1,750,000 for Guaranteed FOs.
    Prior to the 2018 Farm Bill the loan limit for Direct FOs was 
$300,000. Loan limits for Guaranteed FOs, which increase annually based 
on inflation, were at $1,429,000 prior to the 2018 Farm Bill.
    These increased loan limits are necessary to assist farmers in 
their ability to respond to the rising costs of farmland. The loan 
limit changes also will enable more farmers to participate in loan 
programs. Direct loan limits were last increased in the Food, 
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill; Pub. L. 110-246). 
Rising farmland prices since that time have made it increasingly 
difficult for BFs to purchase farmland within the previous $300,000 
Direct FO limit. Many FSA loans are made in conjunction with financing 
from commercial lenders; however, as prices continue to rise joint 
financing arrangements have become less effective to meet demand, 
particularly from BFs looking to purchase real estate.
    This rule amends 7 CFR 761.8 to increase the Direct and Guaranteed 
FO loan limits. In addition, Sec.  761.8(a)(4) and (6) are being 
amended to increase the limits for combined program assistance 
reflecting these increased loan limits. The increase will help family 
farmers better compete with larger, more financially secure farmers 
when purchasing farmland. The amount of the increase is modest and will 
not change the type of farm operation receiving FSA loans.

Farm OL Limits

    Section 5201 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 313 of the CONACT 
(7 U.S.C. 1943) to increase the loan limits for the Direct and 
Guaranteed OL programs. The loan limits have increased to $400,000 for 
Direct OLs and $1,750,000 for Guaranteed OL.
    Prior to the 2018 Farm Bill the loan limit for Direct OLs was 
$300,000. The loan limits for Guaranteed OLs, which increase annually 
based on inflation, were at $1,429,000 prior to the 2018 Farm Bill.
    The 2018 Farm Bill modified the loan limits to better assist 
farmers with the increasing cost of operating and family living 
expenses. Direct and Guaranteed OLs are critical for farmers when 
purchasing crop inputs, livestock feed, farm equipment, and other 
operating expenses. Since direct loan limits were last increased in the 
2008 Farm Bill, the cost for farm equipment and operating expenses have 
risen significantly. The additional operating credit available to 
farmers will assist in responding to this inflation and help them to 
continue to operate.
    This rule amends 7 CFR 761.8 to increase the loan limits for Direct 
and Guaranteed OLs. The increase in the loan limits will give BFs 
access to the credit necessary to finance farm operations at today's 
costs.

95 Percent Guarantee for SDA Farmers and BF Applicants

    Section 5306 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends the CONACT by adding 
section 367 (7 U.S.C. 2008b), which increases the percent of the FSA 
guarantee for Guaranteed FOs and OLs from 90 percent to 95 percent for 
a qualified BF or SDA farmer.
    Previously, lenders could only receive a 95 percent guarantee 
(rather than the typical 90 percent) under limited circumstances such 
as refinancing FSA direct loan debt or participating in the Direct FO 
Down Payment Loan Program. The increase in the guaranteed loan 
percentage will give lenders more incentive to extend credit to BFs and 
SDA farmers, a traditionally underserved segment of farmers.
    This rule amends Sec.  762.129 to increase the Guaranteed FO and OL 
guarantee percentage on loans made to all applicants meeting the 
definition of ``beginning farmer'' or ``socially disadvantaged 
applicant or farmer.''

Veteran Farmers

    Section 12306 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 2501 of the 
Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 2279) 
and expands the definition of veteran farmer to include veterans who 
have first obtained status as a veteran during the most recent 10-year 
period, regardless of their previous farming experience. Specifically, 
this expanded definition includes any veteran who served in the active 
military, naval, or air service; and who was discharged or released 
from service under conditions other than dishonorable; and whose 
discharge was during the most recent 10-years from the date of 
application for a direct or guaranteed loan.
    Section 12306 also amends section 310E of the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 
1935) to include veteran farmers as eligible borrowers to receive 
direct Down

[[Page 13119]]

Payment loans, a program previously limited to BF applicants and SDA 
farmers. To encourage program participation and expand benefits for 
targeted groups, Down Payment Loan Program participants are not charged 
a fee when they receive a guaranteed loan in conjunction with a Down 
Payment loan. This change will ensure guarantee fees are also waived 
for veteran farmers obtaining a direct Down Payment loan. This rule 
amends 7 CFR 761.2, 762.130, 764.201, and 764.202 to include these 
changes.

EMs

    Section 5307 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 373(b)(2)(B) of 
the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 2008h(b)(2)(B)) to allow borrowers who have 
received debt restructuring with a write down to maintain eligibility 
for an EM.
    Prior to the 2018 Farm Bill, borrowers who had received debt 
forgiveness were ineligible for EM. This change addresses the concern 
that borrowers who have experienced a disaster, through no fault of 
their own, are suddenly unable to receive financial assistance and 
continue their operations. Borrowers who have received prior debt 
forgiveness through restructuring with a write down still have viable 
operations and FSA can now extend assistance to those current and past 
borrowers who have suffered from a disaster. While there are other ways 
debt forgiveness can be obtained through FSA, the 2018 Farm Bill 
expands EM eligibility only to those whose debt forgiveness was in 
conjunction with an approved debt restructuring plan.
    This rule amends Sec.  764.352 to allow borrowers who have received 
certain debt forgiveness to remain eligible for EM loans, allowing them 
access to the necessary credit to continue their operations.

Equitable Relief

    Section 5305 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends the CONACT (7 U.S.C. 
2008a) by adding provisions to provide FSA the authority to consider 
equitable relief under certain circumstances for FLP borrowers. 
Previously, there were no statutory provisions for equitable relief for 
FLP.
    FSA is adding the definition of equitable relief to 7 CFR 761.2. 
Equitable relief, as included in the 2018 Farm Bill, allows FSA 
flexibility in working with existing borrower loan accounts that are 
determined to be in non-compliance with loan program requirements, if 
the borrower acted in good faith and relied on a material action of, 
advice of, or non-action from an FSA official. Adding the equitable 
relief definition will provide a common understanding of the term and 
allow reference to the term in other portions of the regulation while 
the specific details and process are provided in a newly added part of 
the regulation.
    FSA is adding a new part, 7 CFR part 768, to address the 
requirements and conditions under which equitable relief can be 
provided. Under existing regulations, FSA has been required to 
determine noncompliant accounts as having received unauthorized 
assistance regardless of cause. Borrowers are then required to 
immediately repay the loan or convert it to a non-program loan subject 
to higher interest rates, less favorable terms, and limited loan 
servicing. Instances have arisen and may arise where borrowers are 
negatively impacted due to good faith reliance on a material action, 
advice, or non-action of an FSA official. The new provision allows FSA 
to consider relief in these specific instances to allow for more 
equitable rates, terms, and conditions to be applied to noncompliant 
accounts. The action, advice, or lack of action should be material to 
the non-compliance for the reliance to be in good faith as required by 
the 2018 Farm Bill. For example, it could be determined reasonable, 
given a certain set of facts, for a borrower to interpret the failure 
of a farm loan officer to respond to a borrower's statement that the 
borrower plans to sell FSA collateral as an approval of that action. 
Depending on the circumstances, the failure of the farm loan officer to 
advise of the consequences of such an action (non-compliance) in 
response to that information from the borrower may constitute a 
material lack of action under the regulation. In contrast, minor 
customer service issues, such as a failure by FSA to make a courtesy 
reminder phone call under FSA policy to a borrower would not rise to 
the requisite level of materiality. Repeated or more significant 
customer service failures could rise to the level of material failures 
based on a case-by-case determination, but such customer service 
issues, especially where disparate levels of service arise across FSA's 
customer base, should also be addressed through other technical service 
initiatives and outreach programs.
    The action, advice, or lack of action relied upon by the borrower 
should also ordinarily be documented, but there may be situations where 
documentation is not reasonably available (for example, where the 
interaction with FSA was verbal). In those situations, the FSA official 
with authority to grant equitable relief may determine that 
contemporaneous documentation is not necessary. A lack of documentation 
on its own should not be held against the borrower. All determinations 
of equitable relief, however, must be documented with an explanation of 
the determining official's basis for providing that relief.
    Impacted borrowers may be required to assist in the resolution of 
the noncompliance, provided the borrower agrees that these actions are 
not detrimental to the long-term viability of the borrower's operation; 
by taking such actions as partially repaying debt, disposing of assets, 
changing operation or entity structure, and other necessary actions to 
return to compliance and or eligibility. The 2018 Farm Bill also 
specifies that equitable relief decisions are not subject to appeal or 
judicial review.

Certified Mediation Program

    Section 5402 of the 2018 Farm Bill amends section 501(c) of the 
Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5101(c)) to expand the scope 
of issues for which mediation may be provided.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 2018 Farm Bill provides that in 
addition to compliance with farm programs and conservation programs, 
national organic program issues may now be mediated. Under the existing 
regulation, the Certified Mediation Program may mediate pesticide use 
issues that fall under the jurisdiction of USDA; this has not changed 
as a result of the 2018 Farm Bill. Under the 2018 Farm Bill's new 
provision, issues involving pesticide use may be a covered issue for 
mediation when it involves organic producers outside of USDA programs. 
In addition, organic certification-related disputes with the local 
agencies that USDA has accredited to provide the certification may also 
be eligible for mediation.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the 2018 Farm Bill provides that 
lease issues, including land and equipment leases, may be issues 
covered by mediation programs. As leasing is a common farm practice, 
disputes can and do occur between farmers and their landlords or 
lessors. Increased restrictions in agricultural leases or the loss of a 
lease can have negative impacts on a farm's viability. Mediation may 
help resolve disputes at the early stages and enable farmers to retain 
land or property under their leases.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the 2018 Farm Bill also includes 
family farm transition as an issue for which mediation services may be 
provided. Farm families are frequently involved in transition issues, 
which may include land division, asset and debt

[[Page 13120]]

distribution, individual and business responsibility for repayment of 
farm loans, farm viability, managing interests and responsibilities of 
off-farm heirs, and intergenerational conflict and responsibilities. 
Unresolved family conflicts often complicate the process when FSA is 
considering making loans to an operation as well as taking loan 
servicing actions. Using mediation to resolve farm transition disputes 
has the potential to keep farms viable. Resolving such disputes and 
developing a sound business plan helps both FSA and the farmers, as FSA 
or other creditors may make loans and help keep farmers in compliance 
with loan or other program requirements.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the 2018 Farm Bill further provides 
that mediation may be used to help resolve farmer-neighbor conflicts. 
As rural areas are developed, farmers are being increasingly faced with 
neighbors who are unfamiliar with, and at times unsympathetic to, 
typical and essential farming practices. Neighbors might complain about 
a farm's noise, hours, dust, pesticide application, manure management, 
odors, and runoff. Conflicts may also occur with municipal ordinances, 
for example fence height limits, impervious cover limitations, and 
prohibitions on specific farming activities. Such disputes may escalate 
into conflicts involving multiple stakeholders that can result in legal 
fees, which may have a negative impact on a farm's viability and 
ability to access credit and pay debts.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the 2018 Farm Bill provides for 
mediation of such other issues as the USDA Secretary or head of a State 
Department of Agriculture of each participating State considers 
appropriate for better serving the agricultural community and persons 
eligible for mediation. This rule, therefore, amends 7 CFR 785.3 to 
provide that the list of additional issues to be mediated will be 
included in the certification and recertification request.
    Section 5402(a)(1)(B) of the 2018 Farm Bill provides that mediation 
grant funding may be used to provide credit counseling to covered 
persons before the initiation of mediation for issues involving USDA or 
for issues unrelated to any ongoing dispute or mediation in which the 
USDA is a party.
    Further, section 5402(a)(2)(C) of the 2018 Farm Bill expanded the 
universe of eligible persons to include any other person involved in an 
issue for which mediation services are provided by a Certified 
Mediation Program. The current definition provides that producers, 
their creditors (as applicable), and other persons directly affected by 
certain actions of USDA are considered ``covered persons.'' This rule, 
therefore, amends 7 CFR 785.2 to revise the definition of ``covered 
persons.''
    This rule also amends 7 CFR 785.4(c) introductory text and (c)(1) 
to provide that grant funds may be used for allowable costs in 
mediating covered issues for covered persons. This rule amends the list 
of the covered issues in 7 CFR 785.4(d) to reflect the additions made 
by the 2018 Farm Bill.
    In addition, a correction is being made in Sec.  785.4(c); the 
reference to Sec.  785.3(b)(2) is being corrected to Sec.  785.3(a)(2), 
and in the introductory text in Sec.  785.9, the reference to 2 CFR 
200.333 is being corrected to 2 CFR 200.334. Also, in Sec.  785.9, the 
recordkeeping requirement is being changed from 5 years to 3 years 
because that is standard for the Federal Government records. For 
consistency, edits are being made throughout 7 CFR part 785 for 
references to the Certified Mediation Program.

Dishonored Payment Fee

    FSA is adding new section 7 CFR 761.11 to add a penalty fee for 
payments made by monetary instruments, such as checks, that are later 
dishonored by the payer's financial institution. Payments made to FSA 
that are later dishonored result in increased burdens on FSA payment 
system and the staff to make accounting corrections, notify borrowers, 
and reprocess payments. FSA will follow the U.S. Treasury statutory 
determination in 26 U.S.C. 6657. By making this revision, FSA will 
offset some of the cost associated with returned checks and anticipates 
that it will serve as a deterrent against future infractions.

Remove Cash as an Acceptable Form of Payment

    FSA is revising its Direct Loan Servicing regulations to remove 
references to cash payments as it will no longer accept cash as a form 
of payment on loans. This change will ensure borrower accounts are 
correctly credited for submitted payments since FSA payment systems are 
not designed to accept cash payments. In addition, the current process 
for cash payments is inefficient. Currently cash payments involve a 
two-step process. Employees have to travel to a financial institution 
to obtain a money order or cashier's check and then have that money 
order or cashier's check used for payment processing, resulting in risk 
or additional risk of loss when using paper-based money for employees 
and customers from, for example, improper handling and human error. The 
regulatory change will require that borrowers provide FSA with a form 
of payment that can be correctly and immediately processed into FSA's 
payment system. FSA has analyzed the change to cash and determined that 
this change will result in minimal impact on customers, will save time 
and expense, eliminate risk, and is consistent with many electronic 
commerce initiatives being implemented throughout USDA.
    The change is consistent with the U.S. Department of the Treasury's 
requirement to accept electronic payments and to meet Federal cash-
management laws (see U.S. Treasury Bulletin No. 2017-12).
    This rule amends 7 CFR 765.151, 765.152, and 765.155, and 766.355 
to remove the term cash.

Maximum Interest Rates

    The regulations in 7 CFR 762.124 specify the interest rate rules 
governing guaranteed loan program loans. Prior to this rule, the 
regulation allowed lenders to charge a maximum interest rate at loan 
closing or restructuring no greater than the 3-month LIBOR for loans 
with rates fixed less than 5-years, or the 5-year Treasury note rate 
for loans with rates fixed for 5 or more years, plus an allowable 
markup.\2\ FSA had also included an alternative method for lenders 
using a risk-based pricing model. These lenders were allowed to charge 
a rate no greater than the rate one risk tier lower than the borrower 
would qualify for without a guarantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ There are two maximum interest rates that depend on the 
length of the loan--one is for shorter term loans and the other is 
for longer term loans. The maximum interest rates are set using a 
base rate plus an allowable markup.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced they 
would phase out LIBOR interest rates, ending publication in December 
2021. Since 7 CFR 762.124 specifically included LIBOR as a rate that 
guaranteed loans may not exceed, FSA is amending Sec.  762.124 to allow 
for a replacement rate comparison.
    FSA monitors the interest rates charged on its loans monthly, 
comparing closed loans' rates to the LIBOR and Treasury thresholds. 
Historically, very few loans have been closed with an interest rate at 
or near the maximum rates allowed, regardless of the interest rate 
method the respective lenders operated under.
    FSA will replace use of the 3-month LIBOR rate with the Secured 
Overnight Financing Rate (which is also known as SOFR) which was 
established by the industry as an alternative to LIBOR

[[Page 13121]]

before LIBOR starts to phase out in December 2021.
    FSA will continue to analyze agricultural lending pricing policies 
and consider any changes in industry loan pricing practices as a result 
of the discontinuation of LIBOR, lender pricing practices, economic 
shocks, and financial market changes. Based on this analysis, FSA will 
determine appropriate short-term maximum interest rates going forward, 
whether using SOFR or another rate, and will post them on the FSA 
website. FSA does not plan to make any changes to the use of the 5-year 
Treasury rate basis plus markup for longer term loans. In order to be 
flexible in response to changes in financial markets and other related 
factors and to ensure the best rates are used to benefit borrowers and 
lenders to ensure the success of the farm loans, we have determined 
that the maximum interest rates are more appropriately announced 
through the FSA website instead of specifying the specific indexes that 
are being used by FSA in the regulation.
    FSA's intent with this rule is not to reduce the rate charged to 
guaranteed loan borrowers, or to reduce lender's profit margin on 
loans. Rather, the purpose of this rule change is to simplify maximum 
interest rate compliance for both lenders and FSA's staff. FSA's intent 
is to select a replacement rate as close to the current LIBOR rates as 
possible to minimize any impact on lenders and guaranteed loan 
borrowers.
    There has also been a concern from FSA staff and lenders about the 
effectiveness of the risk-based pricing method in the regulation. FSA 
included it as an alternative method to establish a maximum interest 
rate for lenders using a formal risk-based pricing method. FSA added 
the option to the regulation in 2013; both the agency and lenders have 
had difficulty in trying to use the option, as explained below.
    There are multiple approaches that lenders use to implement risk-
based pricing and many are more complex than the simple tier system 
envisioned when this method was added to the regulation. Lender 
policies include other factors beyond loan risk. Many include separate 
tiers for default risk and loss risk, allow for considerable analyst 
judgement using subjective factors, and may allow exceptions to 
policies based on local market competition.
    Lenders have also expressed frustration with the risk-based pricing 
method in the regulation. Many are reluctant to share internal interest 
rate practices or formulas and their credit staff are not aware of the 
one tier better requirement, even several years later after 
considerable training. As a result, lender loan narratives frequently 
lack a description of the interest rate tier adjustment and FSA is 
unable to determine at loan approval whether or not the proposed 
interest rate complies with FSA rules. Therefore, FSA has relied 
primarily on post-closing lender file reviews to confirm compliance 
with interest rate regulations.
    This rule amends Sec.  762.124 by removing the risk-based interest 
rate alternative and places all lenders under the same base rates plus 
allowable markup depending on the length of the loan.

Crop Insurance Violations

    FSA is adding a paragraph to Sec.  762.120 to clarify that 
guaranteed loan applicants must not be ineligible for assistance due to 
disqualification resulting from a Federal Crop Insurance violation 
according to 7 CFR part 718. This restriction already applies to FSA 
guaranteed loan applicants; however, FSA is adding this provision to 7 
CFR 762.120 for consistency with an identical limitation in the 
regulations for FSA's direct loan applicants in 7 CFR 764.101(h).

Corrections

    On August 9, 2021, FSA published a final rule titled ``Heirs' 
Property Relending Program (HPRP), Improving Farm Loan Program 
Delivery, and Streamlining Oversight Activities'' (86 FR 43381--43397) 
in which FSA replaced the outdated term ``supervised credit,'' with the 
term ``progression lending'' or similar pro-graduation terminology. 
While most references were updated, several references were 
inadvertently left unchanged. Therefore, the reference to ``supervised 
credit'' wherever it appears in Sec.  761.1(c) is replaced with the 
term ``progression lending,'' the reference to ``supervisory 
agreements'' is replaced with the term ``progression lending plans'' in 
Sec.  761.102(b)(1), and the term ``supervisory needs'' is replaced 
with the term ``progression lending needs'' in Sec.  761.103(a)(2).
    That August 2021 final rule also amended the regulations concerning 
limited resource reviews in 7 CFR part 765. As a result of that change, 
the paragraphs in 7 CFR 766.107 and 766.108 concerning these reviews 
are no longer necessary and this rule is removing them.
    In reviewing the regulations, FSA noticed an inconsistency that 
needs to be addressed to avoid confusion and reduce program delivery 
errors. Specifically, 7 CFR 764.40(d) specifies that title insurance or 
final title opinion can be waived when, among other things, the loan 
amount is less than $10,000. FSA is amending the regulation to increase 
that amount to $25,000.00 to be consistent with EM title requirements 
in 7 CFR 764.355(d) and (e).

Effective Date, Notice, and Comment

    The Administrative Procedure Act (APA, 5 U.S.C. 553) provides that 
the notice and comment and 30-day delay in the effective date 
provisions do not apply when the rule involves any specified actions, 
including matters related to loans. In addition, because this rule is 
exempt from the requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also exempt from 
the regulatory analysis requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
(5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory 
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). The requirements for the 
regulatory flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 are 
specifically tied to the agency being required to issue a proposed rule 
by section 553 or any other law, and the definition of rule in 5 U.S.C. 
601 is also tied to the publication of a proposed rule.
    The rule is not a major rule under Congressional Review Act. 
Therefore, FSA is not required to delay the effective date for 60 days 
from the date of publication to allow for Congressional review.
    Therefore, this rule is effective when published in the Federal 
Register.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and 
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' 
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available 
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select 
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential 
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive 
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasized the importance 
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of 
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The requirements in 
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 for the analysis of costs and benefits 
to loans apply to rules that are determined to be significant.
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as 
not significant under Executive Order 12866 and therefore, OMB has not 
reviewed this rule and an analysis of costs and

[[Page 13122]]

benefits to loans is not required under either Executive Order 12866 or 
13563.

Environmental Review

    This rule revises the provisions on FLP loan limits and servicing. 
The result of these changes will increase loan limits or improve the 
various loan programs and relieve some restrictions to participation or 
otherwise encourage participation. This rule includes changes mandated 
by the 2018 Farm Bill and discretionary technical amendments that are 
administrative in nature. All discretionary aspects of these loan 
actions are covered by the Categorical Exclusions in 7 CFR 799.31(b). 
The discretionary provisions of this action are covered by the 
Categorical Exclusions, found in 7 CFR 799.31(b)(2)(iii) for minor 
amendments or revisions to previously approved actions, and Sec.  
799.31(b)(3)(i), for the issuance of minor technical corrections to 
regulations. No Extraordinary Circumstances (Sec.  799.33) exist. As 
such, the implementation of the discretionary technical amendments 
provided in this rule does not constitute a major Federal action that 
would significantly affect the quality of the human environment, 
individually or cumulatively. Therefore, FSA will not prepare an 
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement for this 
regulatory action and this rule serves as the environmental screening 
documentation of the programmatic environmental compliance decision for 
this Federal action.

Executive Order 12988

    This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 
12988, ``Civil Justice Reform.'' This rule will not preempt State or 
local laws, regulations, or policies unless they represent an 
irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Before any judicial actions may 
be brought regarding the provisions of this rule the administrative 
appeal provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 are to be exhausted.

Executive Order 13175

    This rule has been reviewed for compliance with Executive Order 
13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments.'' The Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to 
consult and coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis 
on policies that have tribal implications, including regulations, 
legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy 
statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or 
more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government 
and Indian Tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
    USDA has assessed the impact of this rule on Indian Tribes and 
determined that this rule has Tribal implications that required Tribal 
consultation under Executive Order 13175. Tribal consultation for this 
rule was included in the 2018 Farm Bill consultation held on May 1, 
2019, at the National Museum of the American Indian, in Washington, DC. 
The portion of the Tribal Consultation relative to this rule was 
conducted by USDA Farm Production and Conservation mission area, as 
part of the Title V session. There were no specific comments from 
Tribes on this rule during Tribal consultation. If a Tribe requests 
additional comments, FSA will work with the Office of Tribal Relations 
to ensure meaningful consultation is provided for modifications 
identified in this rule that are not expressly mandated by legislation.

Unfunded Mandates

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA, Pub. L. 
104-4) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their 
regulatory actions on State, local, or Tribal governments or the 
private sector. Agencies generally must prepare a written statement, 
including a cost benefit analysis, for final rules with Federal 
mandates that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more in any 
1 year for State, local, or Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to 
the private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies to consider 
alternatives and adopt the more cost effective or least burdensome 
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. This rule 
contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory provisions of Title 
II for State, local, or Tribal governments, or private sector. 
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 
and 205 of UMRA.

Federal Assistance Programs

    The title and number of the Federal assistance programs, listed in 
the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, to which this rule applies 
are:

10.099 Conservation Loans;
10.404 Emergency Loans;
10.406 Farm Operating Loans;
10.407 Farm Ownership Loans.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520), this rule does not change the approved information 
collection under OMB control numbers 0560-0155, 0560-0233, 0560-0236, 
0560-0237, 0560-0238 and 0560-0230.

USDA Non-Discrimination Policy

    In accordance with Federal civil rights law and USDA civil rights 
regulations and policies, USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, 
and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are 
prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, 
religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual 
orientation, disability, age, marital status, family or parental 
status, income derived from a public assistance program, political 
beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in 
any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases 
apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by 
program or incident.
    Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of 
communication for program information (for example, braille, large 
print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the 
responsible Agency or USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and 
TTY) or (844) 433-2774 (toll-free nationwide). Additionally, program 
information may be made available in languages other than English.
    To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA 
Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at https://www.usda.gov/oascr/how-to-file-a-program-discrimination-complaint and 
at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in 
the letter all the information requested in the form. To request a copy 
of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form 
or letter to USDA by mail to: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of 
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, 
Washington, DC 20250-9410 or email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7f8f6f4f7c2c4d3d699d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="347b757774414750551a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>.
    USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

List of Subjects

7 CFR Part 761

    Accounting, Loan programs--agriculture, Rural areas.

7 CFR Part 762

    Agriculture, Banks, Banking, Credit, Loan programs--agriculture.

7 CFR Part 764

    Agriculture, Credit, Loan programs--agriculture.

[[Page 13123]]

7 CFR Part 765

    Agriculture, Agricultural commodities, Credit, Livestock, Loan 
programs--agriculture.

7 CFR Part 766

    Agriculture, Agricultural commodities, Credit, Livestock, Loan 
programs--agriculture.

7 CFR Part 768

    Agriculture, Credit, Loan programs--agriculture.

7 CFR Part 785

    Agriculture, Federal-state relations, Grant programs--
intergovernmental relations, Mediation programs.

    For the reasons discussed above, FSA amends 7 CFR parts 761, 762, 
764, 765, 766, 768, and 785 as follows:

PART 761--FARM LOAN PROGRAMS; GENERAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

0
1. The authority citation for part 761 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.

Subpart A--General Provisions


Sec.  761.1   [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  761.1(c), remove ``Parts 761 through 767'' and ``supervised 
credit'' wherever they appear and add ``This part and parts 762 through 
767 of this subchapter'' and ``progression lending'' in their places, 
respectively.
0
3. Amend Sec.  761.2(b) as follows:
0
a. Add the definition of ``Equitable relief'' in alphabetical order; 
and
0
b. In the definition of ``Veteran farmer'':
0
i. Redesignate paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (i) and (ii);
0
ii. In newly redesignated paragraph (i):
0
A. Remove the word ``has'' and add ``Has'' in its place; and
0
B. Remove the word ``or''; and
0
iii. In newly redesignated paragraph (ii), remove ``has'' and the 
period at the end and add ``Has'' and ``; or'' in their places, 
respectively; and
0
iv. Add paragraph (iii).
    The additions read as follows:


Sec.  761.2  Abbreviations and definitions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    Equitable relief means waiving a requirement for Direct Farm 
Ownership, Direct Farm Operating, or Direct Emergency loans when the 
borrower is not in compliance with loan program requirements, but acted 
in good faith and relied on a material action, advice, or non-action 
from an Agency official to the detriment of the borrower's operation.
* * * * *
    Veteran farmer * * *
    (iii) Is a veteran who served in the active military, naval, or air 
service, and who was discharged or released from that service under 
conditions other than dishonorable and who first obtained status as a 
veteran during the most recent 10-year period.
* * * * *


Sec.  761.8  [Amended]

0
4. Amend Sec.  761.8 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), remove the dollar amount ``$300,000'' and 
add ``$600,000'' in its place;
0
b. In paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) and (iii), remove ``$700,000'' and ``2000'' 
and add ``$1,750,000'' and ``2019'' in their places, respectively;
0
c. In paragraph (a)(2)(i), remove the dollar amount ``$300,000'' and 
add ``$400,000'' in its place;
0
d. In paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) and (iii) and (a)(3), remove ``$700,000'' 
and ``2000'' and add ``$1,750,000'' and ``2019'' in their places, 
respectively;
0
e. In paragraph (a)(4), remove the dollar amount ``$300,000'' and add 
``$600,000'' in its place; and
0
f. In paragraph (a)(6), remove ``guaranteed Farm Ownership'' and 
``$800,000'' and add ``guaranteed Farm Ownership loan'' and 
``$1,100,000'' in their places, respectively.

0
5. Add Sec.  761.11 to read as follows:


Sec.  761.11  Dishonored payment fee.

    (a) The Agency will charge a fee for payment transactions that are 
returned for insufficient funds.
    (b) [Reserved]

Subpart C--Progression Lending

0
6. In Sec.  761.102, revise the section heading and paragraph (b)(1) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  761.102  Borrower recordkeeping and reporting.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Cooperate with the Agency and comply with all progression 
lending plans, farm assessments, farm operating plans, year-end 
analyses, and all other loan-related requirements and documents;
* * * * *


Sec.  761.103  [Amended]

0
7. In Sec.  761.103(a)(2), remove the word ``supervisory'' and add 
``progression lending'' in its place.

PART 762--GUARANTEED FARM LOANS

0
8. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.


0
9. In Sec.  762.120, add paragraph (o) to read as follows:


Sec.  762.120  Applicant eligibility.

* * * * *
    (o) Disqualification. The applicant, and all entity members in the 
case of an entity, must not be ineligible due to disqualification 
resulting from a Federal Crop Insurance violation, according to 7 CFR 
part 718.


Sec.  762.124   [Amended]

0
10. Amend Sec.  762.124 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(3) introductory text, remove the words ``the 
following, as applicable:'' and adding ``the rates established and 
announced by the Agency on the FSA website (www.fsa.usda.gov).'';
0
b. Remove paragraphs (a)(3)(i) through (iii); and
0
c. Remove paragraph (a)(4) and redesignate paragraphs (a)(5) and (6) as 
paragraphs (a)(4) and (5).

0
11. Amend Sec.  762.129 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (b)(1); and
0
b. In paragraph (b)(2)(i), remove the acronym ``SDA'' and add 
``socially disadvantaged'' in its place.
    The revision reads as follows:


Sec.  762.129  Percent of guarantee and maximum loss.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) For OLs and FOs, the guarantee will be issued at 95 percent 
when:
    (i) The sole purpose of a guaranteed FO or OL is to refinance an 
Agency direct farm loan and when only a portion of the loan is used to 
refinance a direct Agency loan, a weighted percentage of a guarantee 
will be provided;
    (ii) The purpose of a guaranteed FO is to participate in the down 
payment loan program;
    (iii) A guaranteed OL is made to a farmer who is participating in 
the Agency's down payment loan program. The guaranteed OL must be made 
during the period that a borrower has the down payment loan 
outstanding;
    (iv) A guaranteed OL is made to a farmer whose farm land is subject 
to the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe and whose loan is secured by one 
or more security instruments that are subject to the jurisdiction of an 
Indian tribe;
    (v) A guaranteed FO or OL is made to a qualified socially 
disadvantaged farmer; or

[[Page 13124]]

    (vi) A guaranteed FO or OL is made to a qualified beginning farmer.
* * * * *


Sec.  762.130  [Amended]

0
12. In Sec.  762.130(d)(4)(iii)(C), remove the words ``beginning or 
socially disadvantaged'' and adding ``beginning, socially 
disadvantaged, or veteran'' in their place.

PART 764--DIRECT LOAN MAKING

0
13. The authority citation for part 764 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.

Subpart D--Farm Ownership Loan Program

0
14. In Sec.  764.152, revise the section heading and paragraph (d) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  764.152   General eligibility requirements.

* * * * *
    (d) And in the case of an entity, one or more members constituting 
a majority interest, must have participated in the business operations 
of a farm for at least 3 years out of the 10 years prior to the date 
the application is submitted.
    (1) The following experiences can substitute for up to 2 of the 3 
years:
    (i) Not less than 16 credit hours of post-secondary education in an 
agriculture-related field;
    (ii) Successful completion of a farm management curriculum offered 
by a cooperative extension service, community college, adult vocational 
agriculture program, non-profit organization, or land-grant college or 
university;
    (iii) One (1)-year experience as a farm laborer with substantial 
management responsibility;
    (iv) Successful completion of an internship, mentorship, or 
apprenticeship in day-to-day farm management;
    (v) Significant business management experience;
    (vi) Honorable discharge from the armed forces of the United 
States;
    (vii) Successful repayment of an FSA financed youth loan; or
    (viii) Established relationship with a counselor in the Service 
Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) program who has experience in 
farming or ranching, or with Agency-approved local individuals or 
organizations that are committed to providing mentorship in farming or 
ranching; or
    (2) The 3-year requirement in this paragraph (d) will be waived if 
the applicant meets the requirements of both paragraphs (d)(1)(iii) and 
(viii) of this section.
* * * * *

Subpart E--Downpayment Loan Program


Sec.  764.201  [Amended]

0
15. In Sec.  764.201, remove the words ``beginning farmer or socially 
disadvantaged'' and adding ``beginning farmer, socially disadvantaged 
farmer, or veteran farmer'' in their place.

0
16. In Sec.  764.202, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  764.202  Eligibility requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Be a beginning farmer, socially disadvantaged farmer, or 
veteran farmer.

Subpart I--Emergency Loan Program

0
17. Amend Sec.  764.352 as follows:
0
a. In paragraphs (a) and (b), remove the semicolon and add a period it 
its place;
0
b. In paragraph (c)(3)(i), remove the semicolon and add ``; and'' in 
its place;
0
c. In paragraphs (c)(3)(ii), (d), and (e)(3) and (4), remove the 
semicolon and add a period in its place; and
0
d. Revise paragraph (f).
    The revision reads as follows:


Sec.  764.352  Eligibility requirements.

* * * * *
    (f) And all entity members in the case of an entity, must not have 
received debt forgiveness from the Agency on more than one occasion on 
or before April 4, 1996, or any time after April 4, 1996. A write down 
associated with a restructuring action under Section 353 of the Act is 
not considered debt forgiveness for EM Loan purposes.
* * * * *

Subpart J--Loan Decision and Closing


Sec.  764.402   [Amended]

0
18. In Sec.  764.402(d)(1)(i), remove the dollar amount ``$10,000'' and 
add ``$25,000'' in its place.

PART 765--DIRECT LOAN SERVICING--REGULAR

0
19. The authority citation for part 765 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.

Subpart D--Borrower Payments

0
20. In Sec.  765.151, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:


Sec.  765.151  Handling payments.

    (a) Borrower payments. Borrowers must submit their loan payments in 
a form acceptable to the Agency, such as checks and money orders. Forms 
of payment not acceptable to the Agency include, but are not limited 
to, cash, foreign currency, foreign checks, and sight drafts.
* * * * *


Sec.  765.152  [Amended]

0
21. In Sec.  765.152(b)(4), remove the words ``Cash proceeds'' and 
adding ``Proceeds'' in their place.


Sec.  765.155  [Amended]

0
22. In Sec.  765.155, remove paragraph (a)(1)(i) and redesignate 
paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) through (iv) as paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through 
(iii).

PART 766--DIRECT LOAN SERVICING-SPECIAL

0
23. The authority citation for part 766 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 1989, and 1981d(c).

Subpart C--Loan Servicing Programs


Sec.  766.107  [Amended]

0
24. In Sec.  766.107, remove paragraph (d)(4).


Sec.  766.108   [Amended]

0
25. In Sec.  766.108, remove paragraph (c)(4) and redesignate paragraph 
(c)(5) as paragraph (c)(4).

Subpart H--Loan Liquidation

0
26. In Sec.  766.355, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:


Sec.  766.355   Acceleration of loans.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Pay the account in full;
* * * * *

0
27. Add part 768, consisting of Sec. Sec.  768.1 and 768.2, to read as 
follows:

PART 768--EQUITABLE RELIEF

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989.


Sec.  768.1  Providing equitable relief.

    (a) If the Farm Service Agency (Agency or FSA) determines that a 
borrower is not in compliance with Agency loan requirements in this 
chapter, the Agency may consider equitable relief as specified in this 
section:
    (1) Requirements. After determination that a borrower is in 
noncompliance with loan program requirements in this chapter, the 
Agency may provide equitable relief to a borrower if it is determined 
that the borrower:

[[Page 13125]]

    (i) Acted in good faith; and
    (ii) Relied on a material action, advice, or non-action from an 
Agency official to the detriment of the borrower's operation or the 
action approved by the Agency official resulted in the borrower 
becoming noncompliant with the loan program requirements in this 
chapter.
    (2) Determination. The material action, advice, or response from an 
Agency official under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be 
documented, unless the Agency official with authority to grant 
equitable relief determines that documentation is not reasonably 
available. Notwithstanding any delegations in this chapter, only the 
Secretary, FSA Administrator, Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan 
Programs, or any other official within U.S. Department of Agriculture 
(USDA) specifically designated by the Secretary, may make the 
determination for the Agency to grant equitable relief and must 
document the basis for that determination.
    (3) Relief. If the borrower meets the requirements in paragraph 
(a)(1) of this section, the Agency may provide to a borrower either or 
both of the following forms of equitable relief:
    (i) The borrower may choose to keep loans at current rates or other 
terms received in association with the loan which was determined to be 
noncompliant; or
    (ii) The borrower may receive other equitable relief for the loan 
as the Agency determines to be appropriate.
    (4) Conditions. As a condition of receiving relief, the Agency may 
require the borrower to take actions to remedy the noncompliance, 
provided the borrower agrees those actions do not adversely affect the 
long-term viability of the borrower's operation.
    (b) A determination or action of the Agency under this section is 
final and not subject to administrative appeal or judicial review.


Sec.  768.2  [Reserved]

PART 785--CERTIFIED MEDIATION PROGRAM

0
28. The authority citation for part 785 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1989; and 7 U.S.C. 5101-5104.


0
29. Revise the heading for part 785 to read as set forth above.


Sec.  785.1   [Amended]

0
30. Amend Sec.  785.1 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b), remove ``USDA'', ``certified State mediation 
program'', ``State's certified mediation program'', and ``appeals 
regulations'' and add ``U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'', 
``Certified Mediation Program'', ``State's Certified Mediation 
Program'', ``appeals regulations in this chapter'' in their places, 
respectively;
0
b. In paragraph (d), remove the words ``program certified'' and add 
``Certified Mediation Program'' in their place; and
0
c. In paragraph (e), remove the words ``program certified'' and ``This 
provision'' and add ``Certified Mediation Program'' and ``This 
paragraph (e)'' in their places, respectively.

0
31. Amend Sec.  785.2 as follows:
0
a. Remove the definition for ``Certified State mediation program'' and 
add the definition for ``Certified Mediation Program'' in its place;
0
b. Revise the definition of ``Covered persons'';
0
c. In the definition for ``Mediation services'', remove the words 
``State mediation program'' and add ``Certified Mediation Program'' in 
their place; and
0
d. In the definition for ``Qualifying State'', remove the words ``State 
mediation program'' and add ``Certified Mediation Program'' in their 
place.
    The addition and revision read as follows:


Sec.  785.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Certified Mediation Program means a program providing mediation 
services that has been certified in accordance with Sec.  785.3.
* * * * *
    Covered persons means agricultural producers, their creditors (as 
applicable), persons directly affected by actions of the USDA, and any 
other persons involved in covered issues under Sec.  785.4(d); for 
which mediation services are provided by a Certified Mediation Program.
* * * * *

0
32. In Sec.  785.3, revise the section heading, the introductory text, 
and paragraphs (a) introductory text and (a)(2)(vi) to read as follows:


Sec.  785.3  Annual certification of a State's Certified Mediation 
Program.

    To obtain certification from FSA for the Certified Mediation 
Program, the State must meet the requirements of this section.
    (a) New request for certification. A new request for certification 
of a State mediation program must include descriptive and supporting 
information regarding the mediation program and a certification that 
the mediation program meets certain requirements as prescribed in this 
section. If a State is also qualifying its mediation program to request 
a grant of Federal funds under the Certified Mediation Program, the 
State must submit with its request for certification additional 
information as specified in Sec.  785.4.
* * * * *
    (2) * * *
    (vi) That the State's Certified Mediation Program ensures, in the 
case of other issues covered by the Certified Mediation Program, that:
    (A) USDA receives adequate notification of those issues by the 
deadline specified in Sec.  785.6(a)(1); and
    (B) Persons directly affected by actions of USDA receive adequate 
notification of the Certified Mediation Program; and
* * * * *

0
33. Amend Sec.  785.4 as follows:
0
a. Revise the section heading;
0
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text, remove the words ``State 
mediation program'' and add ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in 
their place;
0
c. In paragraph (b)(1), remove the words ``in any FSA office and on the 
internet,'' and add ``at'' in their place;
0
d. Revise paragraph (b)(2);
0
e. Revise paragraphs (c) introductory text, (c)(1) introductory text, 
and (c)(2)(iv); and
0
f. Add paragraph (d).
    The revisions and addition read as follows:


Sec.  785.4   Grants to States with a Certified Mediation Program.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) A budget with supporting details providing estimates of the 
cost of operation and administration of the Certified Mediation 
Program. Proposed direct expenditures will be grouped in the categories 
of allowable direct costs under the Certified Mediation Program as 
specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
* * * * *
    (c) Grant purposes. Grants made under this part will be used only 
to pay the allowable costs of operation and administration of the 
components of a qualifying State's Certified Mediation Program that 
have been certified as specified in Sec.  785.3(a)(2). Costs of 
services other than mediation services to covered issues and covered 
persons within the State are not considered part of the cost of 
operation and administration of the Certified Mediation Program for the 
purpose of determining the amount of a grant award.
    (1) Allowable costs. Subject to applicable cost principles in 2 CFR 
part

[[Page 13126]]

200, subpart E, allowable costs for operations and administration are 
limited to those that are reasonable and necessary to carry out the 
State's Certified Mediation Program in providing mediation services for 
covered issues and covered persons within the State. Specific 
categories of costs allowable under the State's Certified Mediation 
Program include, and are limited to:
* * * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iv) Services provided by a State's Certified Mediation Program 
that are not consistent with the features of the Certified Mediation 
Program as specified in this part including advocacy services on behalf 
of a mediation participant, such as representation of a mediation 
client before an administrative appeals entity of the USDA or other 
Federal Government department or Federal or State Court proceeding.
    (d) Covered issues. Covered issues include:
    (1) Agricultural loans, regardless of whether the loans are made or 
guaranteed by USDA or made by a third party--mediation services must be 
provided; and
    (2) The following issues for which mediation services may be 
provided to covered persons that are involved in one or more of the 
following:
    (i) Wetlands determinations;
    (ii) Compliance with farm programs, conservation programs, and the 
National Organic Program established under the Organic Foods Production 
Act of 1990;
    (iii) Rural water loan programs;
    (iv) Grazing on National Forest System lands;
    (v) Pesticides;
    (vi) Lease issues, including land leases and equipment leases;
    (vii) Family farm transition;
    (viii) Farmer-neighbor disputes;
    (ix) Such other issues as the Secretary or the head of the 
Department of Agriculture of each participating State considers 
appropriate for better serving the agricultural community and persons 
eligible for mediation; or
    (x) Credit counseling:
    (A) Prior to the initiation of any mediation involving the USDA; or
    (B) Unrelated to any ongoing dispute or mediation in which the USDA 
is a party.
0
33. Revise Sec.  785.5 to read as follows:


Sec.  785.5  Fees for mediation services.

    A requirement that non-USDA parties who elect to participate in 
mediation pay a fee for mediation services will not preclude 
certification of a State's mediation program or its eligibility for a 
grant; however, if participation in mediation is mandatory for a USDA 
agency, a State's Certified Mediation Program may not require the USDA 
agency to pay a fee to participate in a mediation.

0
34. In Sec.  785.6, revise paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:


Sec.  785.6  Deadlines and address.

    (a) * * *
    (3) Requests for additional grant funds during a fiscal year. Any 
request by a State's Certified Mediation Program, that is eligible for 
grant funding as of the beginning of the fiscal year, for additional 
grant funds during that fiscal year for additional, unbudgeted demands 
for mediation services must be submitted on or before March 1 of the 
fiscal year.
* * * * *

0
35. Amend Sec.  785.7 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a), remove the words ``certified State mediation 
program'' and add ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in their 
place;
0
b. In paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, remove the words ``State 
program'' and add ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in their 
place;
0
c. Revise paragraph (c)(1);
0
d. In paragraph (c)(2), remove the words ``certified State mediation 
program'' and add ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in their 
place;
0
e. In paragraph (d)(1)(iii), remove the words ``certified State 
mediation programs'' and add ``Certified Mediation Program'' in their 
place; and
0
f. Revise paragraph (e)(1).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  785.7   Distribution of Federal grant funds.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Grant funds will be paid in advance, in installments throughout 
the Federal fiscal year as requested by a State's Certified Mediation 
Program and approved by FSA. The initial payment to a Certified 
Mediation Program in a qualifying State eligible for grant funding as 
of the beginning of a fiscal year will represent at least one-fourth of 
the State's annual grant award. The initial payment will be made as 
soon as practicable after certification, or re-certification, after 
grant funds are appropriated and available.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) States receiving Certified Mediation Program grant funds are 
encouraged to obligate award funds within the Federal fiscal year of 
the award. A State may, however, carry forward any funds disbursed to 
its Certified Mediation Program that remain unobligated at the end of 
the fiscal year of award for use in the next fiscal year for costs 
resulting from obligations in the subsequent funding period. Any 
carryover balances plus any additional obligated fiscal year grant will 
not exceed the lesser of 70 percent of the State's budgeted allowable 
costs of operation and administration of the State's Certified 
Mediation Program for the subsequent fiscal year, or $500,000.
* * * * *

0
36. Amend Sec.  785.8 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a) introductory text;
0
b. In paragraphs (a)(1) introductory text and (a)(1)(i), remove the 
words ``certified State mediation program'' and add ``State's Certified 
Mediation Program'' in their place;
0
c. In paragraph (a)(2) introductory text, remove the words ``certified 
mediation program'' and add ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in 
their place; and
0
d. In paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(B), remove the word ``certified''.
    The revision reads as follows:


Sec.  785.8  Reports by qualifying States receiving mediation grant 
funds.

    (a) Annual report by the State on its Certified Mediation Program. 
No later than 30 days following the end of a fiscal year during which a 
qualifying State received a grant award under this part, the State must 
submit to the Administrator an annual report on its Certified Mediation 
Program. The annual report must include the following:
* * * * *

0
37. In Sec.  785.9, revise the introductory text and paragraph (c) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  785.9  Access to program records.

    The regulations in 2 CFR 200.334 through 200.338 provide general 
record retention and access requirements for records pertaining to 
grants. In addition, the State must maintain and provide the Government 
access to pertinent records regarding services delivered by the State's 
Certified Mediation Program for purposes of evaluation, audit and 
monitoring of the State Certified Mediation Program as follows:
* * * * *
    (c) All participants in a mediation must sign and date an 
acknowledgment of receipt of such notice from the mediator. The State's 
Certified Mediation Program must maintain originals of such 
acknowledgments in its mediation files for at least 3 years.

[[Page 13127]]


0
38. In Sec.  785.10, revise paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1), 
(2), and (5), and (b) to read as follows:


Sec.  785.10   Penalty for non-compliance.

    (a) The Administrator is authorized to withdraw the certification 
of a State's Certified Mediation Program, terminate or suspend the 
grant to the State's Certified Mediation Program, require a return of 
unspent grant funds, a reimbursement of grant funds on account of 
expenditures that are not allowed, and may impose any other penalties 
or sanctions authorized by law if the Administrator determines that:
    (1) The State's Certified Mediation Program, at any time, does not 
meet the requirements in this part for certification;
    (2) The State's Certified Mediation Program is not being operated 
in a manner consistent with the features of the program as certified by 
FSA, with the regulations in this part, or the grant agreement;
* * * * *
    (5) Reports submitted by a State on its Certified Mediation Program 
as required by Sec.  785.8 are false, contain misrepresentations or 
material omissions, or are otherwise misleading.
    (b) In the event that FSA gives notice to the State of its intent 
to enforce any withdrawal of certification or other penalty for non-
compliance, USDA agencies will cease to participate in any mediation 
conducted by the State's Certified Mediation Program immediately upon 
delivery of such notice to the State.


Sec.  785.11   [Amended]

0
39. In Sec.  785.11, remove the words ``State mediation program'' and 
adding ``State's Certified Mediation Program'' in their place wherever 
they appear.


Sec.  785.12   [Amended]

0
40. In Sec.  785.12, remove the cross reference ``parts 15, 15b and 
1901, subpart E, of'' and adding ``parts 15 and 15b of'' in their 
place.

Zach Ducheneaux,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04858 Filed 3-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>