alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32001R0179 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R0179

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2001 of 29 January 2001 determining the aid referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 for the private storage of butter and cream **

*
Official Journal L 027 , 30/01/2001 P. 0014 - 0014 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 179/2001

of 29 January 2001

determining the aid referred to in Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 for the private storage of butter and cream

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1670/2000(2), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 34(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 of 16 December 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards intervention on the market in butter and cream(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2099/2000(4), stipulates that, without prejudice to Article 38 of that Regulation, the amount of the aid referred to in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 for private storage is to be fixed each year.

(2) Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999 stipulates that entry into store must take place only between 15 March and 15 August of the same year. It is therefore necessary to determine the components of that aid before entry into store for 2001 starts.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The aid referred to in Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 shall be calculated per tonne of butter or butter equivalent for contracts concluded in 2001 on the following basis:

(a) EUR 24 for the fixed costs,

(b) EUR 0,35 for the costs of cold storage of each day of contractual storage, and

(c) an amount per day of contractual storage, calculated on the basis of 91 % of the intervention price for butter in force on the day the contractual storage begins and on the basis of an annual interest rate of 4,5 %.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 January 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48.

(2) OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 10.

(3) OJ L 333, 24.12.1999, p. 11.

(4) OJ L 249, 4.10.2000, p. 20.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001005748
<NAME> ROBINSON PROPERTY GROUP LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,548
<SECURITIES>                                     4,821
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,496<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                        354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,558
<PP&E>                                          77,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,883
<BONDS>                                         38,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,325
<SALES>                                          3,439<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,731
<CGS>                                            3,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,563
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-TRADE ARE REPORTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IN THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION.
<F2>NET SALES ARE REPORTED NET OF PROMOTIONAL ALLOWANCES APPLICABLE TO TANGIBLE
ITEMS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32002R0602 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002R0602

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 602/2002 of 5 April 2002 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled long grain rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2010/2001 **

*
Official Journal L 091 , 06/04/2002 P. 0017 - 0017 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 602/2002

of 5 April 2002

fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled long grain rice in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2010/2001

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 of 22 December 1995 on the common organisation of the market in rice(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2002(2), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) An invitation to tender for the export refund on rice was issued pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2010/2001(3).

(2) Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 584/75(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 299/95(5), allows the Commission to fix, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 and on the basis of the tenders submitted, a maximum export refund. In fixing this maximum, the criteria provided for in Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 must be taken into account. A contract is awarded to any tenderer whose tender is equal to or less than the maximum export refund.

(3) The application of the abovementioned criteria to the current market situation for the rice in question results in the maximum export refund being fixed at the amount specified in Article 1.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The maximum export refund on wholly milled long grain rice to be exported to certain third countries pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2010/2001 is hereby fixed on the basis of the tenders submitted from 29 March to 4 April 2002 at 311,00 EUR/t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 April 2002.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 April 2002.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 329, 30.12.1995, p. 18.

(2) OJ L 62, 5.3.2002, p. 27.

(3) OJ L 272, 13.10.2001, p. 19.

(4) OJ L 61, 7.3.1975, p. 25.

(5) OJ L 35, 15.2.1995, p. 8.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Bridgeline Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ronald M. Levenson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
 
 Date:       December 29, 2010

/s/ Ronald M. LevensonName:
Ronald M. LevensonTitle:
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### IN RE: NUVASIVE, INC., Appellant

2015-1842, 2015-1843

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 10, 2017

Michael T. Rosato, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich *&*Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Andrew Swanson Brown, Sonja Rochelle Gerrard; Grace J. Pak, Paul David Tripodi, II, Los Angeles, CA; Richard Torczon, Washington, DC.

Sarah E. Craven, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Joseph Matal, Scott Weidenfeller.

(Dyk, O’Malley, and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Proclamation 10342 of February 28, 2022

# American Red Cross Month, 2022

Throughout our history, Americans have always stepped up for each other in moments of crisis. This spirit is woven into the fabric of our Nation, and for more than 140 years it has been exemplified by devoted employees, volunteers, and supporters of the American Red Cross. This month, we honor the American Red Cross and the selfless Americans who serve our communities in need across our country and around the world.

Since its founding in 1881 by Clara Barton, a nurse and educator, the American Red Cross has carried out its noble mission of preventing and easing human suffering. Today, in big cities and small towns across the country, hundreds of thousands of Red Cross workers—more than 90 percent of whom are volunteers—continue to carry out that mission by selflessly giving blood, making donations, and teaching first aid in local communities.

Support from the American Red Cross has provided hope to people in their darkest hours—in the face of armed conflict, climate-related disasters, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Red Cross volunteers are on the front lines of recovery, providing emergency shelter to families impacted by devastating floods, tornadoes, fires, and other disasters; donating lifesaving blood to meet the rising demand of hospital patients; supporting our Nation's service members, veterans, and their families; and providing medical care and essential resources to combat diseases worldwide.

During American Red Cross Month, Americans who can are encouraged to answer the call to donate blood and serve communities in need. You are encouraged to learn more about eligibility and the steps involved to donating blood. Let us renew our commitment to Clara Barton's timeless ideal of caring for one another in times of hardship and uncertainty. Let us take part in this proud tradition of lending a helping hand to those in need. Let us live up to the duty of care we owe each other through acts of compassion every day.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America and Honorary Chair of the American Red Cross, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2022 as American Red Cross Month. I encourage all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities, and by supporting the work of service and relief organizations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-eighth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth.



[FR Doc. 2022-04610 Billing code 3395-F2-P
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated June 5, 2012, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-181456) of Smart Trust, Value
Architects Equity Advantage Trust, Series 1.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


June 5, 2012
Dismissed an d Memorandum Opinion filed January 2 4 , 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 11

- 00 952

- CV

____________

JOE GARZON , Appellant

V.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 999178



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

According to information provided to this court, t his appeal is from a judgment
signed October 17, 2011 . No clerk ’ s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for
preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements
to pay for the record.

On December 21 , 20 11 , notification was tra nsmitted to all parties of the c ourt’ s
intent i on to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with
proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record or demonstrated that he has made arrangements to pay for the record

. Accordingly, the
appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Christopher.
August 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

GIAO Q. NGUYEN AND HIEU T. NGUYEN, Appellants

NO. 14-13-01017-CV V.

SEPHORA USA, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed November 5, 2013 in favor 

of appellee Sephora USA, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for 

proceedings in accordance with the court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee Sephora USA.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Honorable Ralph Logan 

County Attorney 

Ton Oreen County 

San Angelo, Texan 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-3446 

Re: Qual.iflcatlonr ofperronm 

entitled to vote for 

county school trusteea. 

We received your letter dated April 23, 1941, requesting our opinion on the following question: 

Are the qualified voters of the San Angelo Independent 

School District proper electors to vote for a member of the 

County Board elected from Precinct One a? Tom Green County? 

We appreciate your opinion and analysis of the question 

which you submitted with your request. 

involved 

You state in your letter that the City of San Angelo lien wholly 

within Precinct One. 

Article 2676, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, reads, in part, 

a* follows: 

"The general management and control of the public free 

schools and high schools in each county, unless otherwise provided by law shall be vested in five (5) county echo01 trustees 

elected from the county, one of whom shall be elected from the 

county at large by the qualified voters of the cormton and consolidated independent school districts of the county, and one 

from each Commissioners' Precinct by the qual.iffed voters of 

Commissioners' Precinct, who shall hold offfce for a term of 

two years. . -" (Underscoring ours) 

We held in our opinion No. O-3235 "that all qualified voters of the 

Commissioners' Precincts of the county may vote for the county school trustee 

from their respective precincts without reference to whether such voters reside in common or independent school districts of whatsoever nature." We wish 

to point out, however, that this rule is not applicable to the truetee who 

is elected by the county at large. 
Honorable Ralph Logan, Page 2 (0-3446) 

You are advised that all of the qualified voters of Commissioners~ 

Precinct Eo. One, which includes the San Angelo Independent School District, 

are proper electors to vote for a member of the County School Board elected 

from Precinct One of Tom Green County. 

We enclose copiee of our opinions Hoe. O-3235 and 0-2066 wherein 

the question la more fully diecursed. 

Yourn very truly 

APPROVED MAY 7, 1941 

/6/ Grover Seller-8 

FIRST ASSISTAET 

All'OBEEYGElVEBAL 

LS:lh:lm 

2 enc. 

ATiXBEEYGEEEBALOFTEEAS 

By /6/ Lee Shoptaw 

Lee Shoptaw 

ABBistsnt 

APPROVED 

OPIEIOE 

COMMITTEE 

BY /e/ BWB 

CHAlRMAa
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 769

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to limit the value of certain

real and personal property that the debtor may elect to exempt under

State or local law, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 9 (legislative day, MAY 1), 1995

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to limit the

value of certain real and personal property that the debtor may elect to exempt under State or local law, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bankruptcy Abuse Re5 form Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

7 Section 522 of title 11, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•S 769 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A) by inserting ‘‘sub2 ject to subsection (n),’’ after ‘‘(2)(A)’’, and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(n) As a result of electing under subsection

5 (b)(2)(A) to exempt property under State or local law, the

6 debtor may not exempt an aggregate interest of more than

7 $100,000 in value in real or personal property that the

8 debtor or a dependent of the debtor uses as a residence,

9 in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or a

10 dependent of the debtor uses as a residence, or in a burial

11 plot for the debtor or a dependent of the debtor.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

87 FR 12748, March 7, 2022.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:00 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Dated: March 7, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-05097 Filed 3-7-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4744



# 
T ROY S HELTONH ALL ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-99-190) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 11, 2002 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Ronnie M. Mitchell, MITCHELL, BREWER, RICHARDSON, ADAMS, BURNS & BOUGHMAN, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, J. Frank Bradsher, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Troy Shelton Hall appeals his conviction for distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 2000). Hall was sentenced to a term of 108 months imprisonment. On appeal, he contends that (1) the district court impermissibly questioned him at trial, causing prejudice to the defense, (2) the district court abused its discretion in overruling Defendant’s objections to the form of certain questions, and (3) the district court erroneously determined the drug quantity attributable to him during sentencing. Because we find no reversible error, we affirm.Hall failed to object at trial to the district court’s questions. Therefore, any challenge is waived except in the "limited exception" where the trial court’s questions were so prejudicial as to deny the defendant a fair and impartial trial. United States v. Gastiaburo , 16 F.3d 582, 589-90 (4th Cir. 1994); Stillman v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. , 811 F.2d834, 839 (4th Cir. 1987). Hall has failed to show this level of prejudice. Hall also challenges several questions as leading and argumentative. We review a district court’s rulings as to the form of questions for a clear abuse of discretion and will not overturn such decisions absent prejudice or clear injustice to the litigant. United States v. Durham , 319 F.2d 590, 592 (4th Cir. 1963). Hall has not demonstrated prejudice here. Hall also claims that the district court erroneously determined hissentence using hearsay testimony in calculating drug quantities. However, reliable hearsay may be considered by sentencing judges in determining relevant facts. United States v. Bowman , 926 F.2d 380, 381 (4th Cir. 1991). Moreover, we note that the district court properly applied a preponderance standard in assessing all evidence bearing on drug quantity. See United States v. Crump , 120 F.3d 462, 468 (4th 2 U NITED S TATES v. H ALLCir. 1997). We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. H ALL