Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2022 / Notices 12933 

6 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

7See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

8See Large Power Transformers from the 

Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 

53177 (August 31, 2012). 

margins exist for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyosung Heavy Industries Corporation 7.92 

Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems 

Co., Ltd .............................................. 7.92 

Iljin Electric Co., Ltd .............................. 7.92 

Iljin ......................................................... 7.92 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after the date of the 

public announcement of these final 

results of review, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rate 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries.6 For any 

individually examined respondents 

whose weighted-average dumping 

margin is above de minimis, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

same sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final 

results of this administrative review, if 

any importer-specific assessment rates 

calculated in the final results are above 

de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), 

Commerce will issue instructions 

directly to CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on appropriate entries. 

To determine whether the duty 

assessment rates covering the period 

were de minimis, in accordance with 

the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer 

(or customer)-specific ad valorem rates 

by aggregating the amount of dumping 

calculated for all U.S. sales to that 

importer or customer and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of the 

sales to that importer (or customer). 

Where an importer (or customer)- 

specific ad valorem rate is greater than 

de minimis, and the respondent has 

reported reliable entered values, we will 

apply the assessment rate to the entered 

value of the importer’s/customer’s 

entries during the POR. 

Consistent with its recent notice,7

Commerce intends to issue appropriate 

assessment instructions directly to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of this notice for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of these final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: 

(1) The cash deposit rate for 

respondents noted above will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margins established in the final results 

of this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 22.00 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties did occur and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 1, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Final Determination of No Shipments 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

A. Hyosung-Specific Issues 

Comment 1: Mis-reported U.S. Sales 

Service Revenues 

Comment 2: Unreported U.S. Sales 

Adjustments 

Comment 3: Use of Facts Available 

B. General Issues 

Comment 4: Rate for Non-selected 

Respondents 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–04888 Filed 3–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[[A–557–813] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

Malaysia: Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
12934 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2022 / Notices 

1See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 

Malaysia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 49309 

(September 2, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2 In the 2018–2019 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order, Commerce collapsed Euro 

SME Sdn. Bhd. and Nature Green and treated them 

as a single entity. See Polyethylene Retail Carrier 

Bags from Malaysia: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019, 85 FR 83515 (December 22, 2020), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

at 3–5, unchanged in Polyethylene Retail Carrier 

Bags from Malaysia: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 86 FR 

22019 (April 26, 2021). Our treatment of Euro SME 

Sdn. Bhd. and Nature Green remains unchanged in 

the instant review. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier 

Bags from Malaysia: Extension of Time Limit for the 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 2019–2020,’’ dated December 7, 2021. 

4The petitioners are the Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bag Committee and its individual members, 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC and Superbag Corporation 

(collectively, petitioners). See Petitioners’ Letter, 

‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia: 

Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’ dated December 14, 2021. 

5See Euro SME’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bags from Malaysia; Resubmission of 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 7, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

7See Commerce’s Letter, In Lieu of Verification 

Questions, dated October 21, 2021; see also Euro 

SME’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags 

from Malaysia; Response to Request for 

Information,’’ dated October 28, 2021. 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

9See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Euro SME 

Sdn. Bhd. made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR) 

August 1, 2019, through July 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Berger, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–24783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 2, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results for 

this administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. This review covers 

one producer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise: Euro SME Sdn. Bhd. and 

Euro Nature Green Sdn. Bhd. (Nature 

Green) (collectively, Euro SME).2 On 

December 7, 2021, we extended the 

deadline for the final results of this 

review to March 1, 2022.3 We received 

a case brief from the petitioners 4 and a 

rebuttal brief from Euro SME.5 A 

complete summary of the events that 

occurred since publication of the 

Preliminary Results is found in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is polyethylene retail carrier bags 

(PRCBs) from Malaysia, which may be 

referred to as t-shirt sacks, merchandise 

bags, grocery bags, or checkout bags. 

Imports of merchandise included within 

the scope of this antidumping duty 

order are currently classifiable under 

statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). This 

subheading may also cover products 

that are outside the scope of this 

antidumping duty order. Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

antidumping duty order is dispositive. 

For a full description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon for the final results of this 

review. However, we took additional 

steps in lieu of an on-site verification to 

verify this information, in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Act.7

Analysis of the Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.8 A list of the 

issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum is attached in 

an appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is available electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, a review of the record, and for 

the reasons explained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, we made 

changes to Euro SME’s preliminary 

margin calculations. For a detailed 

discussion of these changes, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margin 

exists for the respondent for the period 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Euro SME Sdn. Bhd.; and Euro 

Nature Green Sdn. Bhd .......... 6.47 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce calculated an importerspecific ad valorem antidumping 

assessment rate for Euro SME that is not 

zero or de minimis and intends to 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Euro SME for which it did 

not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no company-specific rate for 

the intermediate company(ies) involved 

in the transaction.9

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2022 / Notices 12935 

10See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene 

Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia, 69 FR 48203 

(August 9, 2004). 

1See Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions from the 

Republic of Trinidad and Tobago: Preliminary 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, 

and Extension of Provisional Measures, 87 FR 5783 

(February 2, 2022) (Preliminary Determination). 

2See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Urea Ammonium 

Nitrate Solutions from the Republic of Trinidad and 

Tobago: Petitioner’s Ministerial Error Comments 

Regarding the Preliminary Determination,’’ dated 

February 2, 2022 (Ministerial Allegation). 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Euro SME will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by producers 

or exporters not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior completed 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the producer or 

exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, a 

prior review, or the original 

investigation, but the producer has been 

covered in a prior complete segment of 

this proceeding, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the producer of 

the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 84.94 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.10 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 1, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Partial Application of Adverse 

Facts Available to Euro SME’s Actual 

Weights 

Comment 2: Partial Application of Adverse 

Facts Available to Euro SME’s Inland 

Freight 

Comment 3: Commerce’s Treatment of 

Euro SME’s Freight Revenue 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–04886 Filed 3–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–274–808] 

Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions 

From the Republic of Trinidad and 

Tobago: Amended Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 2, 2022, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published its preliminary determination 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation 

of urea ammonium nitrate solutions 

(UAN) from the Republic of Trinidad 

and Tobago (Trinidad) in the Federal 

Register. Commerce is amending this 

preliminary determination to correct a 

significant ministerial error. 

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit 

Astvatsatrian, AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2022, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary determination in the lessthan-fair-value investigation of UAN 

from Trinidad,1 and disclosed all 

calculations to interested parties. On 

February 2, 2022, CF Industries 

Nitrogen, LLC and its subsidiaries, Terra 

Nitrogen, Limited Partnership and Terra 

International (Oklahoma) LLC (the 

petitioner) filed timely ministerial error 

allegations concerning the Preliminary 

Determination for the sole respondent, 

Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd. 

(MHTL), and requested, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.224(e), that Commerce correct 

the alleged ministerial error.2

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation is April 1, 

2020, through March 31, 2021. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this 

investigation is UAN from Trinidad. For 

a complete description of the scope of 

the investigation, see Preliminary 

Determination, at Appendix I. 

Significant Ministerial Error 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(e), Commerce ‘‘will analyze any 

comments received and, if appropriate, 

correct any significant ministerial error 

by amending the preliminary 

determination.’’ A ministerial error is 

defined in 19 CFR 351.224(f) as ‘‘an 

error in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function clerical error 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

similar type of unintentional error 

which the Secretary considers 

ministerial.’’ A significant ministerial 

error is defined as a ministerial error, 

the correction of which, singly or in 

combination with other errors, would 

result in: (1) A change of at least five 

absolute percentage points in, but not 

less than 25 percent of, the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated in 

the original (erroneous) preliminary 

determination; or (2) a difference 

between a weighted-average dumping 

margin of zero or de minimis and a 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1