alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Monique Nicole WELDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lori NOHE, Warden; Joe Wood, Associate Warden of Security; Jim Rubenstein, Commission, WVDOC; C. J. Rider, Director of Inmate Services, WVDOC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7721

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 30, 2017

Decided: April 4, 2017

Monique Nicole Weldon, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Gardner, Stacy L. Nowicki-Eldridge, WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Monique Nicole Weldon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation. of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Weldon v. Nohe,*No. *2763:16-cv-03815, 2016 WL 7042931 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 2, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7079 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7079

 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
    from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing certain changes to 
 regulations regarding meat and poultry products effluent discharges, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2024

   Mr. Burlison (for himself, Mr. Estes, Mr. Ogles, and Mr. Edwards) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
    from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing certain changes to 
 regulations regarding meat and poultry products effluent discharges, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banning EPA's Encroachment on 
Facilities Act''.

SEC. 2. MEAT AND POULTRY PRODUCTS POINT SOURCE CATEGORY.

    The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may not 
finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule entitled ``Clean 
Water Act Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat 
and Poultry Products Point Source Category'' signed by the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on December 13, 
2023, or any substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
# RECEIVED ,-U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**t~'** 1• 't i 

### OFFICE OFHEARINGS 

## AUG 1**~** 

## 2013 HEARING 

# DOCKET WASHINGTON, DC

In the Matter ofChemSystems, Inc., Respondent. FAA Docket No.: unassigned FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0911 FAA Region: Western-Pacific Judge: Richard C. Goodwin
COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FORCONTINUANCE
To: Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge, and Respondent, through its attorney, Robert Fling, Esq.: Complainant, by andthrough counsel, pursuant to Section 13.218 ofthe Rules of Practice inFAA Civil Penalty Actions, hereby moves to continue the hearing inthis matter to a later date after October 2013. The hearing in thismatter is currently scheduled for September 18 and 19, 2013, in

.• ! Houston, Texas. Complainant and Respondenthave recently been discussing the possibility ofsettlement, and Complainant would like more time to explore settlement. A continuance ofthe hearing will allow Complainant additional time to contact Respondent, and potentially resolve this matter without the necessity ofa hearing. ·Based onvoicemail exchanges, Respondent does not object to a continuance inthis matter and would also like to engage in settlementnegotiations. Furthermore, Complainant's counselhas previously-scheduled leave during the latter

. \ halfofAugust 2013, and was entertaining the possibility oftransferring this case for preparation and hearing to the Complainant's Southwest Regional Office, inFort Worth,

### 2 Texas, due to recentbudgetary constraints related to travel. Counsel in the Southwest Regional Office indicated thatthey were unable to take such a case to hearing until after October 2013. Accordingly, Complainant hereby respectfully requests thatthe hearing in this matter be continued until after October 2013. Respectfully submitted, NAOMI TSUDA

# :~0:~==.:::_:::-

# ____ Attorney Dated: August 9, 2013FAADocketNo.: unassigned FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0871 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

DocumentTitle: Complainant's Motion for Continuance 

### 3

I hereby certifY that on this date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original and one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 I further certifY that on this date I sentvia United States mail, postage prepaid, one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows: Hon. Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 I further certifY that on this date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows: RobertFling, Esq. S. Robert Fling, PLLC 5518 Fifth Street, Suite C Katy, TX 77493 Tel.: (281) 391-2003 Facsimile: (281) 727-0082
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof American Wagering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Icertify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

A signed original of this written statement, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date:  June 12,  2009 |   | /s/  Victor J. Salerno                               |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   | Victor  J. Salerno                                   |
|                                 |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating |
|                                 |   | Officer,  and Chairman of the Board of Directors     |
|                                 |   |                                                 |
|                                 |   |                                                 |
|                                 |   | /s/  Melody J. Sullivan                              |
|                                 |   | Melody  J. Sullivan                                  |
|                                 |   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer               |

 

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-15718

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:17-cr-00066-LGW-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EVEROL PALMER,

 Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(August 29, 2018)

Case: 17-15718 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Jenkins, appointed counsel for Everol Palmer in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel has correctly assessed 

the relative merit of the appeal. Because our independent examination of the entire 

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Palmer’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-15718 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 32001R2020 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R2020

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 of 15 October 2001 on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States (Text with EEA relevance) **

*
Official Journal L 273 , 16/10/2001 P. 0006 - 0014 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001

of 15 October 2001

on the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 of 22 May 1995 relating to the trading of goods by the Community and its Member States with non-member countries(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1917/2000(2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1172/95 the introduction of the nomenclature of countries and territories is the responsibility of the Commission.

(2) The version thereof valid as at 1 January 2001 was set out in the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2000(3).

(3) The alphabetical coding of countries and territories is based on the ISO alpha 2 standard into force as far as it is compatible with the requirements of Community legislation; moreover, it is preferable to have a transition period allowing Member States to adapt to the amendments made; it is essential for purposes of simplification for this transition period to end when the provisions revising the rules on the Single Administrative Document come into force.

(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Statistics relating to the Trading of Goods with Non-member Countries,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The version valid as of 1 January 2002 of the nomenclature of countries and territories for the external trade statistics of the Community and statistics of trade between Member States is set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2002.

However, the Member States may use the three-digit numeric codes also shown in the Annex to this Regulation until the provisions revising Annexes 37 and 38 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93(4) come into force.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 October 2001.

For the Commission

Pedro Solbes Mira

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 118, 25.5.1995, p. 10.

(2) OJ L 229, 9.9.2000, p. 14.

(3) OJ L 243, 28.9.2000, p. 14.

(4) OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.

ANNEX

NOMENCLATURE OF COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES FOR THE EXTERNAL TRADE STATISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY AND STATISTICS OF TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

(Version valid with effect from 1 January 2002)

>TABLE>
#### Seth A. Beattie, Respondent, *v.*The Niagara County Savings Bank, Appellant.

(Argued December 2, 1872;

decided December 10, 1872.)

*S. F. Bowen*for the appellant.

*A. W. Brazee*for the respondent.

All concur for affirmance. No opinion.

Judgment affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) L-3 Communications Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. W58RGZ-10-C-0107 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58357

Jeremy D. Kernodle, Esq.

Haynes and Boone, LLP Dallas, TX Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney LTC Brian J. Chapuran, JA CPT Harry M. Parent, J A

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Board has received the parties'joint motion dated 8 August 2014 to dismiss or alternatively suspend this appeal. The parties request that the Board dismiss this appeal without prejudice pursuantto Board Rule l 8(b) to permit settlement discussions to continue. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed withoutprejudice under Board Rule 18(b). Unless either party or the Board acts within one year to reinstate the appeal, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. Dated: 11 August 2014 

# ,/:Y

# ~~**r~1~~** MARK N. STEMPLE Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58357, Appeal ofL-3 Communications Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

GA FINANCIAL, INC.

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GA Financial, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Kish, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.


/s/ John M. Kish
-------------------------------------------------
John M. Kish
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GA Financial, Inc. and will be retained by GA Financial, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS LEONARD WALLACE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 28 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of April, 2020, the Application to Exceed Wo rd Count

Limit is DENIED. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a compliant Petition for Allowance of

Appeal within 30 days of this order, subject to any filing extensions conferred due to the

COVID

- 19 pandemic. See 533 Judicial Administration Docket.
#### Jaime Alvarez RUIZ, AKA Francisco Alvarez, AKA Gerardo Casares, AKA Alex Ramirez, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-71427

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*467Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 20, 2017

Richard Miyamoto, Attorney, Phung, Miyamoto & Diaz, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Jennifer A.- Singer, Russell John Verby, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ — U.S, Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Alvarez Ruiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

As to past persecution, the agency found Alvarez Ruiz was not credible regarding the only direct past harm he allegedly experienced in Mexico, namely, his claim of arrest and abuse by police. Alvarez Ruiz does not challenge this finding. *See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder,*706 F.3d 1072, 1079-1080 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are deemed waived). As to future harm, the agency found Alvarez Ruiz’s proposed social group was not cognizable. He does not challenge this finding. *See id.*Further, we lack jurisdiction to consider the new social group he presents to the court for the first time. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust claims in administrative proceedings below). Because Alvarez Ruiz does not otherwise challenge the BIA’s basis for denying withholding of removal, we deny the petition for review as to this claim.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Alvarez Ruiz’s CAT claim because he did not show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiesce of the government if returned to Mexico. *See Silaya,*524 F.3d at 1073.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition- is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Micron Memory Japan, Inc., Defendants-Appellants Apple Inc., Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory USA, Inc., Defendants

2016-2358

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 2017

Steven Pollinger, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Joel Lance Thollan-der.

Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendants-appellants.

(Reyna, Linn, and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
NUMBER                                                                   SHARES


               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                              EVENTEMP CORPORATION

                The Corporation is authorized to issue 30,000,000 Common Share -
Par Value $.10 each

THIS CERTIFIES THAT: __________________________________________ is owner of
__________________________________ fully paid and non-assessable shares of
Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
certificate duly endorsed.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation.

DATED:____________________________

------------------------------------        ------------------------------------
SECRETARY                                            PRESIDENT



<PAGE>


         The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations. Additional abbreviations may also
be used though not in the list.

TEN COM -         as tenants in common               UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -. ......
TEN ENT-          as tenants by the entireties       Custodian .................
JT TEN -          as joint tenants with right of     (Cust)             (Minor)
                  survivorship and not as tenants  under Uniform Gifts to Minors
                  in common                          Act ...................
                                                     (State)

    For Value Received, _________________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND
                                      ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

_______________________________________________________________ Shares of the
stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby Irrevocably
constitute and appoint
__________________________________________________________________ Attorney to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises.

Dated_______________________________

                  In presence of                     ___________________________

------------------------------------

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION
OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30,  2003  (the  "Report"),  I,  Allen  E.  Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November  12,  2003
                                        /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Allen  E.  Kahn
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.








                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page