alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                         Jaya Raman, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S107-B, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6511, Email:                         *JRaman@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-04689 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted
Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended May 3, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 10, 2008



|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|/s/ F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                                                                             
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr. Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Said ALI, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-4215

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: August 15, 2017

Filed: August 17, 2017

*998Allison Hart Behrens, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Sayler Anne Ault Fleming, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Missouri, Saint Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Said Ali, Pro Se

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Said Ali challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a gun charge, pursuant to a written plea agreement which included an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising the issue that the district court erred by denying Ali’s motion to suppress evidence prior to his plea. Ali has also filed a pro se supplemental brief, challenging the use of a prior attempted assault conviction as a crime of violence for the purpose of determining his base offense level.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is valid and should be enforced as to the issues on appeal, because our review of the record demonstrates that Ali entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, see Nguyen v. United States, 114 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 1997); the arguments fall within the scope of the waiver; and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver, see United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly; we enforce the appeal waiv_ er¡ grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
### IN THE COURT OF APP EALS OF TENNESS EE AT KNOXVI LLE Se pte m be r 14, 200 9 S es sio n CHRIS YO US IF, d/b/a QU ALIT Y M OTOR S v. NOT RIA L C LAR K and

THE C IRC UIT C OUR T OF KN OX COU NTY Direc t Appeal from the Circ uit Court for Knox County No. 1-565-07 Hon. Dale Wor km an, Jud ge

____________________________ No. E2008-02626-COA- R3-CV - F I L ED JANUARY 13, 2010

____________________________ J o h nW . M cC l ar t y , J . , d i s s en t i n g. Irespe ctfully

dissent. Ba sed upon the factual hi story prese nt in this case, I would aff

irm the tr ia l c ourt ’s dis mis sa l of

the wr it.

___________________________________ JOHN W . McCLARTY, JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,975
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             203
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    345,498
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        224,506
<ALLOWANCE>                                        947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 588,912
<DEPOSITS>                                     417,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,289
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 588,912
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,382
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,080
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,462
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,681
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,781
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 580
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,541
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,541
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.44
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,104
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   822
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  947
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               947
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.11

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                         UNION ELECTRIC CAPITAL TRUST I

            THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Union Electric Capital Trust I (the
"Trust"), dated as of June 17, 2002, is being duly executed and filed by The
Bank of New York (Delaware), a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form
a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss.ss. 3801
et seq.).

      1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is "Union Electric
Capital Trust I".

      2. Delaware Trustee. The name and address of the trustee of the Trust with
a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is:

                        The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                        White Clay Center
                        Route 273
                        Newark, Delaware 19711

      3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon its
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of the
Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first written
above.



                                    THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                                    not in its individual capacity,
                                    but solely as trustee



                                    By:   /s/ WILLIAM L. LEWIS
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Name:  WILLIAM L. LEWIS
                                          Title: Senior Vice President
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0676 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0676

**2001/676/EC: Commission Decision of 20 August 2001 amending Decision 95/453/EC laying down special conditions for the import of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in the Republic of Korea (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 2556) **

*
Official Journal L 236 , 05/09/2001 P. 0018 - 0018 *

Commission Decision

of 20 August 2001

amending Decision 95/453/EC laying down special conditions for the import of bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in the Republic of Korea

(notified under document number C(2001) 2556)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/676/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs(1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 1 of Commission Decision 95/453/EC of 23 October 1995 laying down special conditions for the import of live bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in the Republic of Korea(3), as last amended by Decision 1999/530/EC(4), states that the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries - National Fishery Products Inspection Station (NFPIS) shall be the competent authority in the Republic of Korea for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/492/EEC.

(2) Following a restructuring of the Korean administration, the competent authority for issuing health certificates for fishery products (NFPIS) has changed to the "National Fisheries Products Quality Inspection Service (NFPQIS)" and this new authority is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force. It is, therefore, necessary to modify the nomination of the competent authority identified by Decision 95/453/EC.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Decision 95/453/EC is replaced by the following: "Article 1

The National Fisheries Products Quality Inspection Service (NFPQIS) shall be the competent authority in the Republic of Korea for verifying and certifying that bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods fulfil the requirements of Directive 91/492/EEC."

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 264, 7.11.1995, p. 35.

(4) OJ L 203, 3.8.1999, p. 76.
#### J. Holbrook Cushman, Appellant, *v.*Rachael A. Brundrett et al., Respondents.

Upon appeal from an order which may have been matter of discretion the appellant must show that it was made upon a ground that did not authorize the court to exercise any discretion; otherwise the appeal will be dismissed.

The time to appeal in cases coming under the fourth subdivision of section 11 of the Code is not limited. (Peckham, J.)

(Argued November 12, 1872;

decided November 19, 1872.)

Motion to dismiss appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, affirming an order of Special Term setting aside an inquest. The facts and grounds of motion appear in the opinion. *

*William Watson*for the appellant.

*B. W Townsend-*for the respondents.

*297Peckham, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground that the order involved discretion, also that it was not taken in time. The plaintiff took an inquest in May, 1870. This was set aside by an order at Special Term in first district, Supreme Court, with ten dollars, costs to abide event. The motion was made for irregularity and on the merits. The plaintiff appealed from that order to the General Term of that department. That appeal was decided against him, and after the expiration of more than sixty days from receiving written notice of that last order he appeals to this court. The defendants now move to dismiss the appeal to this court, insisting that that order was not appealable. It is clear that if the order setting aside the inquest was granted upon the merits, then, as it involved the exercise of a discretion, it was not appealable. There is nothing in the papers showing the ground upon which it was made.'

If it were granted for irregularity, as the motion was confessedly made in time, it surely should have been granted with costs. This is substantially a universal rule as to irregularity.

If it were granted upon the merits, the rule is almost as universal (not quite) that it should have been upon payment of costs.

This order does neither. It neither grants costs against plaintiff as for an irregularity nor requires their payment to him as for a favor if upon the merits.

The *onus*is upon the appellant to show that the order was made upon a ground that did not authorize that court to exercise any discretion in its decision. Otherwise the appeal should be dismissed.

It is impossible to make a reasonable guess as to the ground upon which this order setting aside the inquest was made. So far as the case shows, it may have been granted upon either, and this court cannot be called upon to speculate as to which was the real ground. As it may, therefore, have been granted upon the merits, this appeal must be dismissed with costs. (Code, § 11, sub. 4.)

*298It is not necessary to decide the other point. But I find no provision in the Code, and we have been referred to none, limiting the time to appeal in cases of appeals under the fortieth subdivision of section 11. Section 331 does not embrace them.

The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Ail concur.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-188107) of Gazit Globe Ltd. and in the related Prospectus of our
reports dated September 10, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2013.



|                   |  |  |  |                                 
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabby & Kasierer 
|Tel-Aviv, Israel   |  |  |  | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|September 23, 2014 |  |  |  | A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph F. Bukofski, Chief Accounting Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:      /s/ Joseph F. Bukofski                           Dated: August 14, 2003
         ----------------------
         Joseph F. Bukofski
Title:   Chief Accounting Officer


                                     20
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7063 

To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to any pregnancy center 

that diverts people from accessing comprehensive and timely medical 

care from licensed medical professionals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2024 

Mr. LANDSMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to 

any pregnancy center that diverts people from accessing 

comprehensive and timely medical care from licensed 

medical professionals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDING FOR PREGNANCY CEN4 TERS THAT DIVERT FROM MEDICAL CARE. 

5 No Federal funds may be made available to any preg6 nancy center that diverts people from accessing comVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:24 Jan 25, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7063.IH H7063

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7063 IH

1 prehensive and timely medical care from licensed medical 

2 professionals. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6868 

To require the Attorney General to conduct a review and submit a report 

to the Congress on grant and other assistance programs of the Department of Justice to support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, 

dating violence, or stalking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2023 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa (for himself and Ms. CARAVEO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Attorney General to conduct a review and 

submit a report to the Congress on grant and other 

assistance programs of the Department of Justice to 

support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, or stalking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Women and 

5 Children Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6868 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON PROGRAMS SUP2 PORTING VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 

3 SEXUAL ASSAULT, DATING VIOLENCE, OR 

4 STALKING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General of 

7 the United States shall— 

8 (1) complete a review of all grant and other as9 sistance programs of the Department of Justice that 

10 support victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, 

11 dating violence, or stalking, including such programs 

12 under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (34 

13 U.S.C. 12291 et seq.) and the Victims of Crime Act 

14 of 1984 (34 U.S.C. 20101 et seq.); 

15 (2) submit to the Congress a report on the re16 sults of such review. 

17 (b) REPORT CONTENTS.—The report required by 

18 subsection (a)(2) shall include recommendations for 

19 changes to the grant and other assistance programs re20 ferred to in such subsection— 

21 (1) to increase protection and other support of 

22 victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating 

23 violence, or stalking, particularly in rural areas; and 

24 (2) to provide such victims with pathways out 

25 of the environment in which the victims have been 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6868 IH

1 mentally, verbally, physically, or sexually abused; 

2 and 

3 (3) to encourage and increase long-term sup4 port for such victims. 

5 (c) PUBLIC AWARENESS CAMPAIGN.—The Attorney 

6 General of the United States shall publish the report re7 quired by subsection (a)(2) and take such other steps as 

8 may be appropriate to increase awareness of the programs 

9 described in subsection (a)(1) among State agencies, non10 profit organizations, and other entities eligible to apply for 

11 assistance through such programs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB