alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Adam Konopka, Appellant, against Henry E. Bruckman et al., Constituting the New York State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

Argued April 5, 1943;

decided May 27, 1943.

*778
      *William I. Cohen*for appellant.

*Monroe I. Katcher, II,*and *Francis V. McHugh*for respondents.

Order of Appellate Division reversed and determination of the State Liquor Authority annulled, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the findings of the Authority are not supported by any substantial evidence. We express no opinion as to the matter of a renewal of the license of the petitioner. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey and Lewis, JJ. Dissenting: Conway and Desmond, JJ., dissent upon the ground that the record discloses circumstances which afforded scope for a reasonable exercise of administrative discretion in the manner which led to the determination of the Authority. *(Matter of Durr*v. *Paragon Trading Corp.,*270 N. Y. 464, 469; *Matter of Stracquadino*v. *Dept. of Health,*285 N. Y. 93, 96; *Matter of Kasha*v. *Board of Regents,*290 N. Y. 630, decided March, 1943; *Matter of Conomon*v. *State Liquor Authority,*254 App. Div. 650, affd. 276 N. Y. 591; *Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc.*v. *Boland,*282 N. Y. 256, 275; *Matter of Yates,*245 App. Div. 146; *People ex rel. Hirschberg*v. *Board of Supervisors,*251 N. Y. 156, 160, 161; *Matter of Fortino,*273 N. Y. 31; *Lyman*v. *Kurtz,*166 N. Y. 274, 279; *People*v. *Hawk,*156 Misc. 870, affd. 268 N. Y. 678; *Clement*v. *Federal Union Surety Co.,*122 App. Div. 18; *Matter of Clement*[Ruehl certificate] 144 App. Div. 156, 157.) Taking no part: Finch, J.
# Úřední věstník C 34/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0863
  doi:10.3000/19770863.C_2014.034.ces |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 34 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 575. února 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0863

doi:10.3000/19770863.C_2014.034.ces

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 34

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 575. února 2014

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Evropský parlament |
| 2014/C 034/01 | Rozhodnutí | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropský parlament

2014/C 034/01

Rozhodnutí

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropský parlament

| 5.2.2014 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 34/1

---

ROZHODNUTÍ

2014/C 34/01

GENERÁLNÍ TAJEMNÍK EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU,

s ohledem na nařízení Rady (EHS, Euratom, ESUO) č. 259/68 (1) ve znění nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 723/2004 (2) a nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU, Euratom) č. 1080/2010 ze dne 24. listopadu 2010, kterým se mění služební řád úředníků Evropských společenství a pracovní řád ostatních zaměstnanců těchto společenství (3), a zejména na článek 30 tohoto služebního řádu,

s ohledem na rozhodnutí předsednictva ze dne 3. května 2004 o převodu pravomocí orgánu oprávněného ke jmenování (AIPN) a orgánu oprávněného k uzavírání pracovních smluv (AHCC), naposledy pozměněné předsednictvem dne 4. května 2009,

s ohledem na to, že dne 31. prosince 2013 skončila platnost následujících rezervních seznamů Evropského parlamentu:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S,

vzhledem k tomu, že smíšený výbor byl vyzván, aby vydal své stanovisko ve lhůtě 15 pracovních dní v souladu s článkem 10a služebního řádu,

ROZHODL:

Článek 1

Doba platnosti rezervních seznamů:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S

se prodlužuje do 31. prosince 2014.

Článek 2

Doba platnosti rezervních seznamů:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S

se neprodlužuje.

V Lucemburku dne 20. prosince 2013.

Klaus WELLE

generální tajemník

---

(1)  Úř. věst. L 56, 4.3.1968, s. 1.

1

(2)  Úř. věst. L 124, 27.4.2004, s. 1.

2

(3)  Úř. věst. L 311, 26.11.2010, s. 1.

3

---
#### PRECISION STANDARD, INC., Appellant v. UNITED STATES DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY, Appellee

2017-1045

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 19, 2017

Kevin Michael Cox, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, argued for appellant.

Mark E. Porada, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing-ton, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Joyce R. Branda, Robert E. Kirschman, JR., Martin F. Hockey, JR.; Edward Ralph Murray, Office of Counsel, United States Defense Logistics Agency, Richmond, VA.

(Newman, Chen, and Stoll, Circuit . Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.1


                             Incorporated in Bermuda

                                   MONDAY LTD


This is to certify that -



is/are the registered shareholders of:


<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>                     <C>
No. of  Shares          Type of Shares          Par Value

-                        -                        -

Date of Record          Certificate Number      % Paid

-                        -                        -
</TABLE>

The above shares are subject to the Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws of
the Company and transferable in accordance therewith.
                        Given under the Common Seal of the Company

__________________________Director____________________________Director/Secretary
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A (Amendment No.1) for the period ended December 31, 2013
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gil Kotler, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 23, 2014                                  
|                                                           
|/s/ Gil Kotler                                             
|Gil Kotler                                                 
|Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.25.2  


 
 

Amendment 1 to
  First Amendment and Restatement of
  Alliant Techsystems Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan    
  


        The Alliant Techsystems Inc. First Amendment and Restatement of 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (effective March 21, 2000) (the "Plan") is hereby amended
as follows, effective April 24, 2001: 


        (1)    Section 4(a)
is amended to increase the shares available under the Plan by an additional 100,000 shares of Common Stock; and 



        (2)    Section 6(a)(i) is
amended to add a sentence to the end so that Section 6(a)(i), as so amended, reads in its entirety as follows: 


        "(i)    Exercise Price. The purchase price per Share purchasable under an Option shall be determined by the Committee; provided,
however, that such purchase price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of such Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee in its discretion
may determine a price per Share of less than Fair Market Value if such grant is in substitution for a stock option granted by an entity merger with or acquired by the Company or an Affiliate and such
grant is made in connection with such merger or acquisition." 


        Capitalized
terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Plan. 


        Except
as expressly amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and provisions as in effect on the effective date of this Amendment 1. 









QuickLinks


Amendment 1 to First Amendment and Restatement of Alliant Techsystems Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to estimate landfill

leachate flow rates is considered CBI or CBI deducible.
#### Richard MALLOY, Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689, Appellees.

No. 16-7092

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 31, 2017

l:15-cv-01499-RDM

Richard Malloy, Pro Se.

Michael K. Guss, Esquire, Associate General Counsel, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, *650for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

Douglas Taylor, Attorney, Gromfine, Taylor, and Tyler PC,' Alexandria, VA, Douglas Richard Taylor, Law Office of Douglas R. Taylor, Rockville, MD, for Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689.

BEFORE: Brown and Pillard, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of appellant’s brief and the supplement thereto; the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto; the motion to remand; and the response to the October 19, 2016 order to show cause, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for remand be denied and the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Appellant’s “hybrid § 301/fair representation claims” against appellees were subject to a six-month statute of limitations. See DelCostello v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 169, 171-72, 103 S.Ct. 2281, 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). The district court correctly determined those claims were not filed until appellant paid the court filing fee and his complaint was entered on the civil docket, which was well after the six-month period had expired. Appellant’s other civil and criminal claims were properly dismissed because there was no legal theory on which any of the relief sought could be granted. See Baker v. Director, U.S. Parole Commission, 916 F.2d 725, 726 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal whenever “the plaintiff cannot possibly win relief’).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Gazit-Globe Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rachel Lavine, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
    as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Dated:
    April 21, 2016   | 
|--------------------------- | 
|/s/
        Rachel Lavine   | 
|Rachel
    Lavine           | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 677 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 677

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To repeal a redundant venue provision, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsection (a) of section 1392 of title 28, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Subsection (b) of section 1392 of title 
28, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(b) Any'' and 
inserting ``Any''.
            Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 35.1


                   DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

            This OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE is furnished pursuant to Section 3.11 of
the Trust Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2006, by and among Indymac MBS,
Inc., as Depositor, Morgan Stanley & Co., as Underlying Certificate Seller and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, Securities Intermediary and
Bank (the "Trustee"), (the "Trust Agreement"). Capitalized terms not defined
herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Trust Agreement.

            I, Ronaldo Reyes, a Vice President of Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, a national banking association, do hereby certify that:

            1.    A review of the activities of the Trustee for the period
                  beginning October 31, 2006 and ending December 31, 2006 (the
                  "Annual Period") and the performance of the Trustee under the
                  Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

            2.    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee
                  has fulfilled all its obligations under the Trust Agreement,
                  in all material respects throughout the Annual Period.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of
March 2007.


                                     By: /s/ Ronaldo Reyes
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Ronaldo Reyes
                                         Vice President
#### In the Matter of Frederica Bond (now Frederica B. Bindley), Respondent. Lee Shubert, Appellant.

Argued May 19, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*903
      *Theodore Kiendl, William Klein, Milton B. Weinberger*and *Adolph Lund*for appellant.

*Roland Ford*and *Herman B. Forman*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway. Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2013 - 0543 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM202AD

A320 - 57 - 1169 --- 1/12/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
**CERTIFICATIONS**




I,
      Andrew
      Leszczynski, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SACO
      I
      Trust 2006-10 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
      required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report
      is
      included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.
      I am
      responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
      on
      my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
      compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
      AB,
      and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
      have
      fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and




5.
      All of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
      otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
      described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
      10-K.




In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC Mortgage Corporation, as servicer;
      LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; American Security Insurance
      Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and Safeco Financial Institution
      Solutions, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each as vendor; GMAC Mortgage,
      LLC, as servicer; GMAC Bank, as vendor; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
      custodian.




Date:
      March 29, 2007




LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Master Servicer




/s/
      Andrew Leszczynski


Andrew
      Leszczynski


First
      Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000


<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                   23,623
<SECURITIES>                                                             11,873
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            30,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         69,654
<PP&E>                                                                   15,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          115,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    20,392
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                               93,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            115,590
<SALES>                                                                  89,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         89,911
<CGS>                                                                    23,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            23,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         62,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       (1,660)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           5,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              5,517
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           8
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              372
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                380
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0.03



</TABLE>