alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 687 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 687

  To prevent States and local jurisdictions from interfering with the 
 production and distribution of agricultural products in interstate or 
                           foreign commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 2015

    Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. 
 Peterson, Mr. Blum, Mr. Huelskamp, and Mr. Young of Iowa) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent States and local jurisdictions from interfering with the 
 production and distribution of agricultural products in interstate or 
                           foreign commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Interstate Commerce Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERFERENCE BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 
              WITH PRODUCTION OR MANUFACTURE OF ITEMS IN OTHER STATES.

    (a) In General.--Consistent with article I, section 8, clause 3 of 
the Constitution of the United States, the government of a State or 
locality therein shall not impose a standard or condition on the 
production or manufacture of any agricultural product sold or offered 
for sale in interstate commerce if--
            (1) such production or manufacture occurs in another State; 
        and
            (2) the standard or condition is in addition to the 
        standards and conditions applicable to such production or 
        manufacture pursuant to--
                    (A) Federal law; and
                    (B) the laws of the State and locality in which 
                such production or manufacture occurs.
    (b) Agricultural Product Defined.--In this section, the term 
``agricultural product'' has the meaning given such term in section 207 
of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1626).
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6632 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require the Secretary 

of Agriculture to make timely decisions on applications of retail food 

stores to accept benefits from recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance through on-line transactions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. LIEU (for himself, Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require 

the Secretary of Agriculture to make timely decisions 

on applications of retail food stores to accept benefits 

from recipients of supplemental nutrition assistance 

through on-line transactions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timely Review of 

5 SNAP Online Retailer Applications Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6632 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR DECISIONS ON APPLICATIONS TO 

2 ACCEPT BENEFITS THROUGH ON-LINE 

3 TRANSACTIONS. 

4 Section 7(k) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

5 (7 U.S.C. 2016(k)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(5) TIMELY REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In implementing para9 graph (1), the Secretary, to the maximum ex10 tent practicable, shall make a determination of 

11 approval or non-approval of an application of a 

12 retail food store to accept benefits from recipi13 ents of supplemental nutrition assistance 

14 through on-line transactions not later than 180 

15 days after the Secretary receives that applica16 tion. 

17 ‘‘(B) NOTIFICATION OF CONGRESS.—If the 

18 Secretary is not able to make a determination 

19 described in subparagraph (A) by the deadline 

20 described in that subparagraph, the Secretary 

21 shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture, 

22 Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate and the 

23 Committee on Agriculture of the House of Rep24 resentatives a written notification that includes 

25 an explanation of the reasons why the Secretary 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6632 IH

1 was not able to make the determination by the 

2 applicable deadline.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                              0001005335
<NAME>                        Smith Barney Principal PLUS Futures Fund L.P. II

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       8,594,209
<SECURITIES>                                                14,023,893
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  305,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            22,923,446
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              22,923,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          668,818
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  22,254,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                22,923,446
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               634,711
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               252,671
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                382,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   382,040
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    24.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Fehlhaber Pile Co., Inc., Respondent, *v.*B. Turecamo Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant.

Argued March 9, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

*726
      *Chester B. McLaughlin, William C. Goodson*and *Morris G. Duchin*for appellant.

*Irwin H. Rosenberg*and *Louis Rosenberg*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Celvin Brooks v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00175-CR

Trial court case number: 1515314

Trial court: 184th District Court of Harris County

This Court’s August 21, 2018 Order of Abatement had abated and remanded this 

case for the trial court to determine whether appellant’s counsel, David Booker, had 

abandoned this appeal and whether new counsel should be appointed. On October 4, 2018, 

the September 13, 2018 abatement hearing record was filed in this Court in which the trial 

court found that Mr. Booker had abandoned the appeal and it re-appointed Scott Pope, from 

the Harris County Public Defender’s Office, as counsel. On October 9, 2018, a

supplemental clerk’s record was filed in this Court attaching the September 13, 2018

pauper’s oath on appeal and order of the court appointing Scott Pope as counsel. However, 

on September 20, 2018, Jani Maselli, Assistant Public Defender, Harris County Public 

Defender’s Office, filed a designation of new lead counsel to replace Scott Pope.

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte directs the Clerk of this Court to REINSTATE

this case on the Court’s active docket, to remove David Booker and Scott Pope as 

appellant’s counsel, and to designate Jani Maselli as appellant’s new lead counsel. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(c), 6.5(b), (d). Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 

days of the date of this order. See id. 2, 34.5(c)(3), 38.6(a)(1). The State’s appellate brief, 

if any, is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days from the filing of appellant’s brief. 

See id. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 16, 2018
#### Kevin COCHRANE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OPEN TEXT CORPORATION; Open Text Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 15-16322

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 18, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed June 27, 2017

Jeffrey Faucette, Skaggs Faucette LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Patrick P. Gunn, Attorney, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey A. Rosenthal, *849Cleary Gottlieb Steen *&*Hamilton LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and DRAIN,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Gershwin A. Drain, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants Open Text Corporation and Open Text, Inc (“Open Text”) appeal the district court’s judgment confirming an arbitration award against them and in favor of Appellee Kevin Cochrane, a former employee. The primary issue below and on appeal is whether the parties agreed to submit the question of arbitrability to arbitration.

1. The district court correctly determined that the parties had agreed to arbitrate arbitrability via incorporation in the employment agreement of the American Arbitration Association’s Rules. *Brennan v. Opus Bank,*796 F.3d 1125, 1130 (9th Cir. 2015). The district court then deferred, as required by that agreement, to the arbitrator’s determination that the amount of variable compensation fell within his jurisdiction. *See First Options of Chicago v. Kaplan,*514 U.S. 938, 944-45, 115 S.Ct. 1920, 131 L.Ed.2d 985 (1995).

2. Neither the arbitrator’s determination that he had jurisdiction to determine the amount of variable compensation to which Cochrane was entitled nor the arbitrator’s determination of the amount was “completely irrational or exhibited] a manifest disregard of the law.” *Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc.,*341 F.3d 987, 997 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (citations and quotation marks omitted). The arbitrator’s decisions derived from the language of contracts signed between the parties and representations Open Text made to Cochrane. It therefore does not matter whether this court “might have interpreted the contract[s]” between Coch-rane and Open Text in a different manner. *Bosack v. Soward,*586 F.3d 1096, 1106 (9th Cir. 2009).

The district court’s order is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of TOMBSTONE CARDS, INC. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John H. Harris,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 24, 2008


By:       /s/ John H. Harris
         -----------------------------
         John H. Harris
         Chief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 739 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 739

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade for the vessel SISU, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46, United 
States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. 
U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for 
the vessel SISU, United States official number 293648.

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 739

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade for the vessel SISU, and for other purposes.
```
#### Margaret Christmas LAFARGUE and Alexander Lafargue, Appellants, v. Dr. Ernest C. SAMUEL et al., Appellees.

No. 23034.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1966.

John D. Lambert, Jr., Harry Nowalsky, New Orleans, La., Robert B. Adam, Gulfport, Miss., and Coe, Nowalsky & Lambert, New Orleans, La., for appellants.

Rae Bryant, Gulfport, Miss., James N. Drury, Drury & Lozes, New Orleans, La., Thomas L. Stennis, II, Gulfport, Miss., for appellees.

Before JONES, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, the controlling principle is announced in Succession of Roux v. Guidry, decided by the Court of Appeal of Louisiana and reported in 182 So.2d 109. The rule there announced requires that the judgment of the district court be, and it is

Affirmed.
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

November 29 , 2012

Docket Number: EPA

- HQ

- OPP

- 2011

- 0885 www.regulations.gov

Errata Sheet for the Pyrethrins Summary Document (12/13/2011)

In the version of the pyrethrins Summary D ocument that was posted in the public docket , EPA indicated under Hazard Characterization, second bullet on page 17 that “Pyrethrins were classified as “Suggestive Evidence of Carcin ogenicity, but Not Sufficient to Assess Human Carcinogenic Potential” because there was suggestive evidence that pyrethrins are carcinogenic based on weight

- of

- the

- evidence considerations.” This was an error on EPA’s part and was

noted in EPA’s response t o comments section on page 7 of the pyrethrins Final Work Plan (5/18/2012).

The correction classification for the p yrethrins is “Not Like ly to be Carcinogenic to Humans at doses that do not cause a mitogenic response in the l iver/cell proliferation.” This is indicated in the EPA HED report “PYRETHRINS: Fourth Report of the Cancer Assessment Review Committee”, TXR No.: 0054822, dated February 14, 2008

.
September 23, 2014

To: expartecommunication@hq.doe.gov (sent via email)

Re: Memorandum Summarizing Ex Parte Communication

On September 12, 2014, representatives of the American Gas Association (AGA) met with staff of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to share and discuss the results of a national survey of builders and contractors designed to identify the likely rates of fu el switching under a scenario of a national condensing standard for gas furnaces and the output from a sp readsheet model developed by AGA and the Gas Technology Institute designed to assess and quantify the impacts of the fuel switching data gathered from the contractor/builder survey. The purpose of this meeting was to encourage DOE to incorporate similar types of analyses in the rulemaking proceeding und erway on a new gas furnace
standard. The subject of establishing two product categories for furnaces was also discussed as a possible option for consideration in the rulemaking proceeding.

The following persons attended the meeting: Representing the Department of Energy

• Judith Greenwald

• Joseph Hezir

• Melanie Ke nderdine

• Ernest Moniz

Representing the America n Gas Association

• Kathryn Clay

• David McCurdy

Documents review and discussed at the meeting are attached

. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kathryn Clay

Kathryn Clay | Vice President, Policy Strategy
American Gas Association 400 N. Capitol St., NW | Washington, DC | 20001
P: 202

- 824

- 7122 | F: 202

- 824

- 9125 | kclay@aga.org
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

39 40 41 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rosa ROGEL-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40014 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 16, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rosa Rogel-Jimenez, Aliceville, AL, pro se.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Kathryn Shephard, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rosa Rogel-Jimenez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rogel-Jimenez has not filed a response. We *796have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0526 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0526

**2002/526/EC: Commission Decision of 28 June 2002 repealing Decision 94/141/EC approving the plan presented by France for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in the northern Vosges (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 2380) **

*
Official Journal L 170 , 29/06/2002 P. 0085 - 0085 *

Commission Decision

of 28 June 2002

repealing Decision 94/141/EC approving the plan presented by France for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in the northern Vosges

(notified under document number C(2002) 2380)

(Only the French text is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/526/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever(1), and in particular Article 16(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Classical swine fever was confirmed in the feral pig population in northern Vosges, France.

(2) By means of Decision 94/141/EC(2), the Commission approved the plan presented by France for the eradication of classical swine fever in feral pigs in northern Vosges.

(3) France has provided information suggesting that classical swine fever has been successfully eradicated from the feral pigs in northern Vosges.

(4) For the sake of clarity Decision 94/141/EC should therefore be repealed.

(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 94/141/EC is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2002.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 316, 1.12.2001, p. 5.

(2) OJ L 61, 4.3.1994, p. 29.