alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 11, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50691 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICHAEL SCOTT WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-128-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Michael Scott Willis, pro se federal prisoner # 04279-180, appeals the district court’s denial of his “Motion Renewing Objections to Pre-Sentence Report.” The district court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion. Willis’s appellate brief addresses the merits of his underlying claim but does not address the district court’s ruling that it lacked jurisdiction. Willis points to no legal authority for the district court to entertain his motion. Thus, Willis hasNo. 05-50691 -2- abandoned any argument that the district court’s dismissal of his motion for lack of jurisdiction was erroneous. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Even if we were to construe Willis’s motion liberally as seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, such a motion would be successive. Willis’s claims do not meet the criteria for filing a successive § 2255 motion because (a) they do not rely on newly-discovered facts that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty, and (b) they do not rely on a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive by the Supreme Court on collateral review. See §§ 2244(b)(3), 2255; see also In re Elwood, 408 F.3d 211, 213 (5th Cir. 2005) (holding that United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), provides no basis for a successive § 2255 motion). Willis has failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).”
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, we DISMISS the appeal as frivolous.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olaf James HAUGEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30137

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 16, 2017 * Seattle, Washington

Filed June 22, 2017

John David Sullivan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Lori Anne Harper Suek, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mark S. Werner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Gillian Elissa Gosch, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT— Federal Defenders of Montana (Billings), Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: BYBEE and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and DORSEY,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Haugen appeals his jury conviction of aggravated sexual abuse and the sentence imposed by the district court.

1. We affirm a jury conviction if “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, *any*rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” *United States v. Nevils,*598 F.3d 1158, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc) (quoting *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). The evidence is adequate to support Hau-gen’s conviction for aggravated sexual assault, which required the jury to find that the defendant knowingly used force to cause the victim to engage in a sexual act. 18 U.S.C. § 2241. Testimony from the victim at trial could have led the jurors to determine both the elements of “sexual act” and “force” were met beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The district court’s within Guidelines range sentence was “reasonable” and not “procedurally erroneous or substantively unreasonable.” *United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008). The district court refused to consider a factual and credibility question raised by Haugen at sentencing. The decision not to allow the testimony at sentencing was not a procedural error, as there is no clear error and this court is not “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” *United States v. Christensen,*732 F.3d 1094, 1101 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting *Easley v. Cromartie,*532 U.S. 234, 242, 121 S.Ct. 1452, 149 L.Ed.2d 430 (2001)). The decision also does not affect the substantive reasonableness of the sentence, because taking into account the totality of the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the testimony was irrelevant to sentencing and *825a matter for the jury and imposing the within Guidelines range sentence. *Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by'Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit
        32
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
 Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, I, Barry Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of
 Advanced
        ID Corporation (the “Company"), hereby certify, that to the
 best
        of
        my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
        quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934
        and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 Date:
        August 4, 2005
 
 /s/
        Barry I. Bennett
 Barry
        I.
        Bennett, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND THE UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED CONTAINED IN THE REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 OF WIRELESS XCESSORIES GROUP, INC., AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             503
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (492)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,155
<PP&E>                                           1,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,692
<SALES>                                         14,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,157
<CGS>                                            7,044
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    454
<INCOME-TAX>                                       195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                259
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (82)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       177
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03



</TABLE>
21S T SENATORIA L DISTRIC T 

MAR Y J O WHIT E 

SENATE BOX 20302t 

T HE STATE CAPITOL 

HARMISBUlia, PA I7l20-30at 

(717) 7a7-»684 

TTY (SCO) 3«s-i8ai 

FAX: (717) 7S7-60a8 

EMAIL: mwhit«@passn.gov 

WEBSITE: sanatormjwhite.com 

<P^ils^ 

July 23,2010 

COMMITTEES 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Br ENEROV , 

CHAIRMAN 

APPROPRIATIONS 

EDUCATION 

CONSUMER PROTECTION at PROFESSIONAL 

LICENSURE 

JUDICIARY 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD 

JOINT CONSERVATION COMMITTEE 

PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON SENTENCING 

WILD RESOURCE CONSERVATION FUND 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVaney 

Chief, Essential Service District X-53 

Office of Aviation Analytics 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVaney: 

I am writing regarding the Essential Air Service (EAS) contract for the Oil Region at 

Venango Regional Airport in Franklin, PA. I support Gulfstream International Airlines' 

proposal to continue to provide 18 round trip flights per week to Cleveland Hopkins International 

Airport for an annual subsidy of $915,101. 

Both the Venango County Commissioners and the Venango Area Chamber of Commerce 

are supporting Gulfstream International's proposal and are committed to working with the 

Airport and Gulfstream through the Save our Service effort to improve passenger enplanements 

so that the cost per passenger does not exceed the $200 cap. 

I ask for your favorable consideration of Gulfstream's proposal which is the air service 

preferred by area residents. 

Sincerely, 

MARYOO WHITE 

SENATOR, 21ST DISTRICT 

cc: Venango County Commissioners 

Venango Area Chamber of Commerce
IB 

Union Calendar No. 285 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6918 

[Report No. 118–349] 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 

funding for pregnancy centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHBACH (for herself, Ms. TENNEY, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mrs. MILLER

of Illinois, Mr. TIMMONS, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. ESTES, Mr. 

MOOLENAAR, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Mr. GUEST, Mr. 

NEWHOUSE, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. FINSTAD, Mr. STAUBER, and Mrs. LESKO

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on January 9, 2024] 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6918 RH

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from restricting funding for pregnancy centers. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6918 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Pregnant 

5 and Parenting Women and Families Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PREG7 NANCY CENTERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

9 Human Services may not finalize, implement, or enforce, 

10 with respect to expenditures for any pregnancy center, the 

11 modification to section 263.11 of title 45, Code of Federal 

12 Regulations, as described in the proposed regulation set 

13 forth beginning on page 67697 of volume 88 of the Federal 

14 Register, or any substantially similar regulatory action. 

15 (b) DEFINITION OF PREGNANCY CENTER.—In sub16 section (a), the term ‘‘pregnancy center’’ means any organi17 zation, such as a pregnancy resource center, pregnancy help 

18 center or organization, or pregnancy medical center, that— 

19 (1) supports protecting the life of the mother and 

20 the unborn child; and 

21 (2) offers resources and services to mothers, fa22 thers, and families, including but not limited to rela23 tionship counseling, prenatal and pregnancy edu24 cation, pregnancy testing, diapers, baby clothes, or 

25 material supports. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 285 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6918 

[Report No. 118–349] 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human 

centers. Services from restricting funding for pregnancy 

JANUARY 16, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Todd
Noble, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced ID
Corporation.
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present, in all material respects, the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 (c)
Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: May
9, 2005
 
 /s/ Todd
Noble
 Todd
Noble, Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6901 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on Department of Defense restrictions on the employment of former Department 

employees by certain countries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

a report on Department of Defense restrictions on the 

employment of former Department employees by certain 

countries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RE4 STRICTIONS ON EMPLOYMENT OF FORMER 

5 DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES BY CERTAIN 

6 COUNTRIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 30, 2024, 

8 the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6901 IH

1 on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Represent2 atives a report that includes each of the following: 

3 (1) The policy of the Department of Defense in 

4 effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act 

5 with respect to any restrictions on the employment 

6 of former Department employees by countries that 

7 exhibit adversarial behavior against the interests of 

8 the United States. 

9 (2) An identification of the positions in the De10 partment to which such restrictions apply. 

11 (3) An identification of any incident when a 

12 former employee of the Department worked for, or 

13 sought to work for, any such country in contraven14 tion of such a restriction. 

15 (b) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by sub16 section (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but 

17 may include a classified annex. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)**

 

I, William E. Myers, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TravelCenters of America LLC; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:    March 6, 2018 | /s/ William E. Myers                                         |
|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       | William E. Myers                                                  |
|                                       | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer   and Treasurer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4637-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4637-DR), dated January 14, 2022, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued February 3, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include Public 
Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined 
to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster 
by the President in his declaration of January 14, 2022.

    Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson, Gibson, Henderson, Henry, Lake, 
Obion, Stewart, Sumner, and Weakley Counties for Public Assistance 
(already designated for Individual Assistance).
    Decatur and Dyer Counties for Public Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04594 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P