alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Berel David STOLWORTHY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10376

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2017*

Filed July 17, 2017

Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Berel David Stolworthy, Pro Se

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Berel David Stolworthy appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 136-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Stolworthy’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Stolworthy the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Stolworthy waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id.*at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Journal officiel C 34/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0936
  doi:10.3000/19770936.C_2014.034.fra |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 34 |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 57e année5 février 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0936

doi:10.3000/19770936.C_2014.034.fra

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 34

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

57e année5 février 2014

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Parlement européen |
| 2014/C 034/01 | Décision | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Parlement européen

2014/C 034/01

Décision

1

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Parlement européen

| 5.2.2014 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

C 34/1

---

DÉCISION

2014/C 34/01

LE SECRÉTAIRE GÉNÉRAL DU PARLEMENT EUROPÉEN,

vu le règlement (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 259/68 du Conseil (1), modifié par le règlement (CE, Euratom) no 723/2004 du Conseil (2) et en dernier lieu par le règlement (UE, Euratom) no 1080/2010 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 24 novembre 2010 modifiant le statut des fonctionnaires des Communautés européennes et le régime applicable aux autres agents de ces Communautés (3) et notamment l'article 30 de ce statut,

vu la décision du bureau du 3 mai 2004 concernant la délégation des pouvoirs de l'autorité investie du pouvoir de nomination (AIPN) et de l'autorité habilitée à conclure les contrats d'engagement (AHCC), telle que modifiée en dernier lieu par le bureau, le 4 mai 2009,

vu la date d'expiration, le 31 décembre 2013, des listes de réserve du Parlement européen ci-après:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S,

considérant que la commission paritaire a été invitée à émettre son avis dans un délai de 15 jours ouvrables conformément à l'article 10 bis du statut,

DÉCIDE:

Article premier

La durée de validité des listes de réserve:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S

est prorogée jusqu'au 31 décembre 2014.

Article 2

La durée de validité des listes de réserve:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S

n'est pas prorogée.

Luxembourg, le 20 décembre 2013.

Klaus WELLE

Secrétaire général

---

(1)  JO L 56 du 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  JO L 124 du 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  JO L 311 du 26.11.2010, p. 1.

3

---
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Golden Century Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  October 13, 2010





By:       /s/ David Lee


David Lee


President, Treasurer and Director





(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      of**


**Chief
      Executive Officer**


**of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




This
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the  report on Form
      10-QSB (the “Form 10-QSB”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, of
      Buckeye Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Alan J. Mintz, the Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or
                section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-QSB
      pursuant to Item 601(6)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part
      of
      the Form 10-QSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the
      registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.






Date:
                November 19, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/ Alan J. MintzAlan
                J. MintzPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 802 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 802

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel ROYAL 
                                AFFAIRE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 1995

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel ROYAL 
                                AFFAIRE.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, 
and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with a 
coastwise endorsement for the vessel ROYAL AFFAIRE, United States 
official number 649292.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Espere PIERRE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-13182 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(May 5, 2017)

Olivia Choe, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Seth Michael Schlessinger, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Roy Jeffrey Kahn, Roy J. Kahn, PA, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant Willis Maxi

David Scott Markus, Law Offices of David Marcus, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant Markentz Blanc

Before HULL, WILSON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James Gailey, appointed counsel for Es-pere Pierre, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to with*881draw is GRANTED, and Pierre’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
·l!Y.~~J aediG3ted to goun!Kcess • www.pulaskitech.edu 

August 8, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington DC, 20590 

SUBJECT: Request for extension of exemption. 

Exemption No: 7926E 

Docket Number FAA-2002-13291 

Dear Sir or Ma'am, 

. ;:\· 

I request that an extension of exemption 7926E be approved for my organization. The 

ability to test students upon the completion of training has greatly benefited their ability 

to succeed in their pursuit of FAA mechanics certification. In the past a student had to 

complete 12 months of training before being evaluated on the first 3 months of that 

training. 

Since the approval of this exemption the completion rate of our curriculum has continued 

. to increase. The number of students completing the entire maintenance training 

program has also increased. · 

With the implementation of this exemption, students are more confident and self reliant 

as to their ability to succeed in the program. Our exemption has benefited this program 

immensely. · 

I hope to have our exemption extended another 2 years. Please contact me if you have 

any questions. 

Sincerely, 

~"1~ 

Vince Gemmiti, 

Director of Aerospace 

Pulaski Technical College 

vgemmiti@pulaskitech.edu 

PH: (501) 835-5420 

FX: (501) 834-7859 

Aviation Maintenance fechnologlJ tenter 

160~~west Man'.jland Me11ve North little Rock AR 72i20 Phone 501-83•y5420 Fax 501·8w;a59
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27

Financial Data Schedule

 "This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from March 31, 1997 10QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                            158,878
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,527
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       17,993,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  160,405
<PP&E>                            46,437
<DEPRECIATION>                         (553,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         17,647,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             386
<BONDS>                           16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       1,212
<COMMON>                          46,349
<OTHER-SE>                        17,583,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      17,647,397
<SALES>                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  200,218
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     6,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   193,868
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    193,868
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      193,868
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                     .004
        

</TABLE>
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed, United States-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the national emergency was expanded to deny monetary and material support to the Cuban government. On February 24, 2016, by Proclamation 9398, and on February 22, 2018, by Proclamation 9699, the national emergency was further modified based on continued disturbances or threatened disturbances of the international relations of the United States related to Cuba. The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of excessive force against United States vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba.

Further, the unauthorized entry of any United States-registered vessel into Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy of the United States because such entry could facilitate a mass migration from Cuba. It continues to be United States policy that a mass migration from Cuba would endanger United States national security by posing a disturbance or threatened disturbance of the international relations of the United States.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867, as amended by Proclamation 7757, Proclamation 9398, and Proclamation 9699.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2022-04144

Billing code 3395-F2-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6959 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6959

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that dependent 
   children under the age of 26 are eligible for coverage under the 
 Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2024

  Ms. Brownley (for herself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that dependent 
   children under the age of 26 are eligible for coverage under the 
 Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fix FEDVIP Age Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDVIP COVERAGE FOR DEPENDENT CHILDREN UNDER AGE 26.

    Section 8901(5) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``22'' in each instance and inserting ``26''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ezekiel Donja GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4548

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2017

Decided: June 8, 2017

*734W. Michael Dowling, BROOKS PIERCE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, First Assistant United States Attorney, Barbara D. Kocher, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KEENAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ezekiel Donja Gardner appeals his 120-month sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Gardner argues that the district court erred in applying sentencing enhancements for a stolen firearm and possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense. He also claims that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to address adequately his arguments at sentencing. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

We review a criminal sentence “under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.” *Gall v. United States, 552*U.S. 38, 41, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). “In determining whether a district court properly applied the advisory [Sentencing] Guidelines, including application of any sentencing enhancements, we review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error.” *United States v. Layton,*564 F.3d 330, 334 (4th Cir. 2009). Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support the district court’s findings that Gardner possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense and that the firearm was stolen. *See*U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A), (6)(B) (2013). We also find sufficient the district court’s explanation of Gardner’s within-Guidelines sentence. *See Rita v. United States,*551 U.S. 338, 356, 359, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13739-13740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 13740]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Neuroscience and Behavior Study 
Section.
    Date: June 7, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 
20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, Room 2116, MSC 6902, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-0800, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e4c4c5b544f5d6e434f47420040474600494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="13717166697260537e727a7f3d7d7a7b3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 7, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-05075 Filed 3-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dion Levering WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6050

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 22, 2017

Jeffrey Michael Brandt, ROBINSON & BRANDT, PSC, Covington, Kentucky, for Appellant. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

*794Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dion Levering Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of'the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*