12084 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2022 / Notices 

part of the blend equals or exceeds 35% of the 

volume of the blend. 

20Commerce determined that T.T. International 

Co., Ltd. and T.T. International Co., Limited are a 

single entity (collectively, TTI). 

1See Initiation and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 17124 (April 1, 

2021); see also Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical 

Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from the People’s 

Republic of China and India: Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 83 FR 4637 (February 1, 2018) (Order). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Drawn 

Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from 

India: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 

2020,’’ dated October 5, 2021. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Cold-Drawn 

Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from 

India; 2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

125 incorporated into a blend that conforms 

to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 34 is excluded 

from the scope of these orders. When R–125 

is blended with other products and otherwise 

falls under the scope of these orders, only the 

R–125 component of the mixture is covered 

by the scope of these orders. 

Subject merchandise also includes purified 

and unpurified R–125 that is processed in a 

third country or otherwise outside the 

customs territory of the United States, 

including, but not limited to, purifying, 

blending, or any other processing that would 

not otherwise remove the merchandise from 

the scope of the orders if performed in the 

country of manufacture of the in-scope R– 

125. The scope also includes R–125 that is 

commingled with R–125 from sources not 

subject to these orders. Only the subject 

component of such commingled products is 

covered by the scope of these orders. 

Excluded from the scope is merchandise 

covered by the scope of the antidumping 

order on Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the 

People’s Republic of China, including 

merchandise subject to the affirmative anticircumvention determination in 

Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People’s 

Republic of China: Affirmative Final 

Determination of Circumvention of the 

Antidumping Duty Order; Unfinished R–32/ 

R–125 Blends, 85 FR 15428 (March 18, 2020). 

See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping 

Duty Order, 81 FR 55436 (August 19, 2016) 

(the Blends Order). 

R–125 is classified under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheading 2903.49.1010. Merchandise 

subject to the scope may also be entered 

under HTSUS subheadings 2903.49.0000 and 

3827.11.0000, or 3827.39.0000. The HTSUS 

subheadings and CAS registry number are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of the orders is dispositive. 

Appendix II—Separate Rate Companies 

Exporter Producer 

Non-individually-examined exporters receiving separate rates Producers supplying the non-individually-examined exporters receiving 

separate rates 

Huantai Dongyue International Trade Co. Ltd ......................................... Jinhua Binglong Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Dongyue Chemical Co., Ltd .................................................... Shandong Dongyue Chemical Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd ................................................. Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd. 

T.T. International Co., Ltd./T.T. International Co., Limited 20 ................... Sinochem Environmental Protection Chemicals (Taicang) Co., Ltd. 

T.T. International Co., Ltd./T.T. International Co., Limited ...................... Zhejiang Quhua Fluor-Chemistry Co., Ltd. 

T.T. International Co., Ltd./T.T. International Co., Limited ...................... Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry. Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd ..................................................... Jinhua Yonghe Fluorochemical Co., Ltd.

Zibo Feiyuan Chemical Co., Ltd ............................................................... Zibo Feiyuan Chemical Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–04505 Filed 3–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–874] 

Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing 

of Carbon and Alloy Steel From India: 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of 

carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn 

mechanical tubing) from India during 

the period of review, January 1, 2020, 

through December 31, 2020. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable March 3, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eliza Siordia or Eric Hawkins, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3878 or (202) 482–1988, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 1, 2021, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on colddrawn mechanical tubing from India.1

On October 5, 2021, Commerce 

extended the time period for issuing 

these preliminary results by 117 days, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 The revised deadline for these 

preliminary results is now February 25, 

2022. 

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included at the 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is cold-drawn mechanical tubing 

from India. For a complete description 

of the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) 

of the Act. For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily find that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution 

that gives rise to a benefit to the 

recipient, and the subsidy is specific.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2022 / Notices 12085 

5See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results 

of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386, 37387 (June 

29, 2010). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of Subsidy Rate 

for Non-Selected Companies Under Review,’’ dated 

February 25, 2022. 

7Entries for Goodluck India Limited may have 

been made under the following company names: 

Goodluck India Limited (formerly Good Luck Steel 

Tubes Limited); Good Luck Steel Tubes Limited 

Good Luck House; and Good Luck Industries. 

8Tube Investments of India Ltd. is also known as 

Tube Investments of India Limited. 

9See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1); 

see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) 

(Temporary Rule). 

11See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

12See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

13See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

14See Temporary Rule. 

15See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

16See 19 CFR 351.310. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not directly address the subsidy rate 

to be applied to companies not selected 

for individual examination where 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, 

Commerce normally determines the 

rates for non-selected companies in 

reviews in a manner that is consistent 

with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation. 

Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides 

that ‘‘the individual countervailable 

subsidy rates determined under 

subparagraph (A) shall be used to 

determine the all-others rate under 

section 705(c)(5) {of the Act}.’’ Section 

705(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that for 

companies not investigated, in general, 

we will determine an all-others rate by 

weight-averaging the countervailable 

subsidy rates established for each of the 

companies individually investigated, 

excluding zero and de minimis rates or 

any rates based solely on the facts 

available. 

Accordingly, to determine the rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination, Commerce’s practice is to 

weight average the net subsidy rates for 

the selected mandatory companies, 

excluding rates that are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available.5 We preliminarily determine 

that Goodluck India Limited (Goodluck) 

and Tube Investments of India Ltd. (TII) 

received countervailing subsidies that 

are above de minimis and are not based 

entirely on facts available. Therefore, we 

preliminarily determine to apply the 

weighted-average of the net subsidy 

rates calculated for Goodluck and TII 

using publicly ranged sales data 

submitted by those respondents to the 

non-selected companies.6 The following 

companies are companies for which a 

review was requested, and which were 

not selected as mandatory respondents 

or found to be cross-owned with a 

mandatory respondent: KLT Automotive 

and Tubular Products Limited; 

Metamorphosis Engitech India Private 

Limited; and Pennar Industries Limited 

India. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

For the period January 1, 2020, 

through December 31, 2020, we 

preliminarily find that the following net 

subsidy rates exist: 

Company 

Subsidy rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Goodluck India Limited 7 ....... 3.30 

Tube Investments of India 

Ltd.8 ................................... 5.57 

Review-Specific Average Rate 

Applicable to the Following 

KLT Automotive and Tubular 

Products Limited ............... 3.96 

Metamorphosis Engitech 

India Private Limited ......... 3.96 

Pennar Industries Limited 

India .................................. 3.96 

Assessment Rate 

Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act, upon issuance of the final 

results, Commerce shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties 

on all appropriate entries in accordance 

with the final results of this review. If 

the assessment rate calculated in the 

final results is zero or de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate all 

appropriate entries without regard to 

countervailing duties. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP 

to collect cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties in the amounts 

indicated above, except, where the rate 

calculated in the final results is de 

minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required on shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company, 

as appropriate. These cash deposit 

instructions, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We will disclose to parties to this 

proceeding the calculations performed 

in reaching the preliminary results 

within five days of the date of 

publication of these preliminary 

results.9 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.10 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.11 Case and 

rebuttal briefs should be filed using 

ACCESS 12 and must be served on 

interested parties.13 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. Note 

that Commerce has temporarily 

modified certain of its requirements for 

serving documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.14

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing must do so within 30 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

by submitting a written request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system.15

Requests should contain the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, and a list of 

the issues to be discussed. Issues raised 

in the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs.16 If a request for a 

hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

the date and time of the hearing two 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
12086 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2022 / Notices 

1See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, 

Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015). 

days before the scheduled date. Parties 

are reminded that all briefs and hearing 

requests must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS and received 

successfully in their entirety by 5:00 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of our analysis of 

the issues raised by the parties in their 

comments, within 120 days after 

publication of these preliminary results. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This administrative review and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. 

Dated: February 24, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Period of Review 

V. Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

VI. Subsidies Valuation Information 

VII. Benchmarks and Interest Rates 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–04490 Filed 3–2–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review and Join 

Annual Inquiry Service List 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may 

request, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213, that the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) conduct an 

administrative review of that 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

order, finding, or suspended 

investigation. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

comments or actions by Commerce 

discussed below refer to the number of 

calendar days from the applicable 

starting date. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event Commerce limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews 

initiated pursuant to requests made for 

the orders identified below, Commerce 

intends to select respondents based on 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the 

period of review. We intend to release 

the CBP data under Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) to all parties 

having an APO within five days of 

publication of the initiation notice and 

to make our decision regarding 

respondent selection within 35 days of 

publication of the initiation Federal 

Register notice. Therefore, we 

encourage all parties interested in 

commenting on respondent selection to 

submit their APO applications on the 

date of publication of the initiation 

notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. 

Commerce invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the review. 

In the event Commerce decides it is 

necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, Commerce finds that 

determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will 

not conduct collapsing analyses at the 

respondent selection phase of a review 

and will not collapse companies at the 

respondent selection phase unless there 

has been a determination to collapse 

certain companies in a previous 

segment of this antidumping proceeding 

(i.e., investigation, administrative 

review, new shipper review or changed 

circumstances review). For any 

company subject to a review, if 

Commerce determined, or continued to 

treat, that company as collapsed with 

others, Commerce will assume that such 

companies continue to operate in the 

same manner and will collapse them for 

respondent selection purposes. 

Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse 

companies for purposes of respondent 

selection. Parties are requested to: (a) 

Identify which companies subject to 

review previously were collapsed; and 

(b) provide a citation to the proceeding 

in which they were collapsed. Further, 

if companies are requested to complete 

a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for 

purposes of respondent selection, in 

general each company must report 

volume and value data separately for 

itself. Parties should not include data 

for any other party, even if they believe 

they should be treated as a single entity 

with that other party. If a company was 

collapsed with another company or 

companies in the most recently 

completed segment of a proceeding 

where Commerce considered collapsing 

that entity, complete quantity and value 

data for that collapsed entity must be 

submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that requests a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that Commerce may 

extend this time if it is reasonable to do 

so. Determinations by Commerce to 

extend the 90-day deadline will be 

made on a case-by-case basis. 

Deadline for Particular Market 

Situation Allegation 

Section 504 of the Trade Preferences 

Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act 

by adding the concept of particular 

market situation (PMS) for purposes of 

constructed value under section 773(e) 

of the Act.1 Section 773(e) of the Act 

states that ‘‘if a particular market 

situation exists such that the cost of 

materials and fabrication or other 

processing of any kind does not 

accurately reflect the cost of production 

in the ordinary course of trade, the 

administering authority may use 

another calculation methodology under 

this subtitle or any other calculation 

methodology.’’ When an interested 

party submits a PMS allegation pursuant 

to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce 

will respond to such a submission 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES