alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1998
FIRST QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,506
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          20,312
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    448,950
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        324,454
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 838,272
<DEPOSITS>                                     474,804
<SHORT-TERM>                                   152,580
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,223
<LONG-TERM>                                     77,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 838,272
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,892
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,058
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,950
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,653
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,297
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 257
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,664
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,664
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.23
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,426
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,322
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       37
<RECOVERIES>                                        36
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,501
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,501
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DEBBIE HUGHEY,

Petitioner

v.

SEPTA - SOUTHEASTERN 

PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION 

AUTHORITY, EDWARD ROBINSON AND 

REGINA STONE,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6918 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6918

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2024

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 
                     funding for pregnancy centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Pregnant and Parenting 
Women and Families Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PREGNANCY CENTERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not 
finalize, implement, or enforce, with respect to expenditures for any 
pregnancy center, the modification to section 263.11 of title 45, Code 
of Federal Regulations, as described in the proposed regulation set 
forth beginning on page 67697 of volume 88 of the Federal Register, or 
any substantially similar regulatory action.
    (b) Definition of Pregnancy Center.--In subsection (a), the term 
``pregnancy center'' means any organization, such as a pregnancy 
resource center, pregnancy help center or organization, or pregnancy 
medical center, that--
            (1) supports protecting the life of the mother and the 
        unborn child; and
            (2) offers resources and services to mothers, fathers, and 
        families, including but not limited to relationship counseling, 
        prenatal and pregnancy education, pregnancy testing, diapers, 
        baby clothes, or material supports.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 18, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
                      Financial Data Schedule

 "This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from March 31, 2000 10QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                        78,535
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 290,122
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   11,193,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        49,937
<DEPRECIATION>                (1,388)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                10,108,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   1,312
<COMMON>                      49,014
<OTHER-SE>                    9,875,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  10,108,220
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 9,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (10,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (10,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (10,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                 .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .000


</TABLE>
#### Q INTEGRATED COMPANIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee Sage Acquisitions, LLC, Intervenor-Appellee

2016-1991

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Filed: 06/02/2016

James Fontana, Jeffry Cook, Attorney, David • Barnes Dempsey, Esq., Dempsey Fontana, Tysons, VA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Heidi L. Osterhout, Trial Attorney, Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee United States.

Richard William Oehler, Attorney, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, Andrew Victor, Perkins Coie, LLP, Washington, DC, for Intervenor-Appellee Sage Acquisitions, LLC.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Q Integrated Companies, LLC’s unopposed motion to withdraw its appeal,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3)All other pending motions are denied • as moot.
#### Preet M. SINGH, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent

2016-2668

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 9, 2017

Cassady Toles, Kern, Noda, Devine *&*Segal, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner.

Mark E. Porada, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr„ Elizabeth M. Hosford; Morgan E. Rehrig, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, Washington, DC.

. (Prost, Chief Judge, Reyna and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 13024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-344, OMB Control No. 3235-0391]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form T-6

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and 
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form T-6 (17 CFR 269.9) is an application for eligibility and 
qualification for a foreign person or corporation under the Trust 
Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et seq.). Form T-6 provides the 
basis for determining whether a foreign person or corporation is 
eligible to serve as a trustee for qualified indenture. Form T-6 takes 
approximately 17 burden hours per response and is filed by 
approximately one respondent annually. We estimate that 25% of the 17 
hours (4.25 hours) is prepared by the filer for an annual reporting 
burden of 4 hours (4.25 hours per response x 1 response).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication by May 9, 2022.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John 
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d1d1f0c12002c24212f22350d3e282e632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c09092819f8da1a9aca2afb880b3a5a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 3, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04890 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**FORM 10-K**

 

**ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANTTO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGEACT OF 1934**

 

**For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2013**

**Commission file number:****333-144504**

 

**Pacific Oil Company**

**(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)**

 

 

**9500 W. Flamingo Rd. Suite205**

**Las Vegas, NV 89147**

**(Address of Principal ExecutiveOffices)**

 

**Registrant’s telephone number, includingarea code:****1 888 303 2272**

**Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)of the Act: None**

**Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g)of the Act:**

 

**Common Stock, $0.001 parvalue**

**(Title of class)**

 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes[ ] No [x]  .

 

Indicateby check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [x]  .

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ] 

 

Indicateby check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will notbe contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by referencein Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [x]

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reportingcompany. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x]

 

For theyear ended September 30, 2013, the issuer had revenues of $0.

 

The Company’scommon stock, $.001 par value is traded on the OTCQB.

 

Aggregate market value ofvoting common equity held by non-affiliates as of March 31, 2013: $4,720,500

 

The number of shares outstandingof the issuer’s common stock, $.001 par value, as of March 5, 2014 was 60,057,490 shares.   

 

****

**Pacific Oil Company**

**Form 10-K Annual Report**
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Clifford S. Feibus, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
this report on Form 10-K of the Corporate Backed Callable Trust Certificates, J.C. Penney Debenture-Backed Series 2006-1 Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing, or similar, agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2016



|       |  |                                     
|------ |  | ------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Clifford S. Feibus              
|Name:  |  | Clifford S. Feibus                  
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Controller
|       |  | (Senior Officer of the Depositor)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>           9
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,308
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,869
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          17,290
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,100
<LOANS>                                        365,971
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,055
<DEPOSITS>                                     319,713
<SHORT-TERM>                                   165,412
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,632
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,262
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 523,055
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,213
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,001
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   574
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,788
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,584
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,296
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,492
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      145
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,748
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,748
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,363
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.82
<LOANS-NON>                                        265
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    441
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,503
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       37
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,634
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,634
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
I Date: December 17,2008 

# Record ofCoJtacts 

# AVS Quality Management System Title: Domestic Change Worksheet 

### QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F4 Revision 

### 1



## FDMS Docket No. FAA-1;OO2DID-



# ala"](

_. -- ,- -- --"'.-----,-~.-----------._-- ._- --.--- ·r---------------------- 

### With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (~.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization 

### Person Contacted Date BoeingAR Tim Rudkin I 06/25120]0 ATA Joe White I 

### 06/2512010

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify ThaI This ISthb Correct Revision Before Use
Opinion issued September 27, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00722-CV

———————————

IN RE RAYMOND C. CLARK, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Raymond C. Clark, Jr., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, 

challenging a final order in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship. He requests 

that we direct respondent, the Honorable K. Randall Hufstetler, to vacate the order 

and grant a new trial.1 Because the trial court has signed a final order in the 

 

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of H.C.C., a Child, Cause No. 68312, in the 

300th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable K. Randall 

Hufstetler presiding.
2

underlying proceeding, relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 109.002(b) (West 2014); In re Moore, No. 05-14-01173-CV, 2016 WL 

80205, at *6 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 7, 2016, orig. proceeding) (citations omitted);

In re Harrell, No. 01-13-00517-CV, 2014 WL 866044, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] Mar. 4, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citations omitted).

2

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

 

2

In an issue in his petition, relator contends that he does not have an adequate remedy 

at law because portions of the electronically recorded trial court proceedings are 

inaudible. Relator may raise his contentions that the reporter’s record is incomplete 

or inaccurate in an appeal from the trial court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e), 

(f); see, e.g., Akinwamide v. Trans. Ins. Co., No. 01-15-00066-CV, 2016 WL 

3662696, at *8 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] July 7, 2016, no. pet. h.); 

Villagomez Invs., L.L.C. v. Magee, 294 S.W.3d 687, 689–90 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.).