alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Environmental Protection Agency

Integrated Compliance Information System - NPDES

Local Limits Program Report

Created Date: 09/17/2013

Refresh Date: 6/27/14

Created By: HQ

Version 1.0

NPDES ID: 

State: UT

Report Date Range: 01/01/2007 To 04/22/2014

Local Limits Program Details Per Permittee

Report Received Date: 07/21/2007

Local Limits

Date of Most Recent Technical Evaluation for Local Limits: 7/21/08

Date of Most Recent Adoption of Technically Based Local Limits: 7/21/08

Removal Credits

Removable Credits Application Status: Not Applicable

Date of Most Recent Removal Credits Approval:

Arsenic

Cadmium

Chromium

Copper

Cyanide

Lead

Mercury

Molybdenum

Nickel

Selenium

Silver

Zinc

Div

Local Lim Pollutants: Removal Credits:

NPDES ID: UT0020427 Facility Name: PAYSON CITY CORPORATION City: PAYSON County: Utah

Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael SASSNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-12356 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(November 3, 2017)

R. Brian Tanner, James D. Durham, Brian T. Rafferty, Edward J. Tarver, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Savannah, GA, Nancy Greenwood, Patricia Green Rhodes, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Augusta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael Sassnett, RRM Atlanta, Residential Reentry Office, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARCUS, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

*923PER CURIAM:

Brendan Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Sassnett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sassnett’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                    CASE CREDIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    SIX MONTHS
                                                                    ENDED JUNE
                                                                        30,
                                                                    -----------
                                                                    1997  1996
                                                                    ----- -----
<S>                                                                 <C>   <C>
Net Income......................................................... $  39 $  45
Add:
  Interest expense.................................................    44    31
  Amortization of capitalized debt expense ........................   --      1
  Portion of rentals representative of interest factor ............   --    --
  Income tax expense and other taxes on income ....................    18    32
  Fixed charges of unconsolidated subsidiaries ....................   --    --
                                                                    ----- -----
    Earnings as defined ........................................... $ 101 $ 109
                                                                    ===== =====
Interest expense .................................................. $  44 $  31
Amortization of capitalized debt expense ..........................   --    --
Portion of rentals representative of interest factor ..............   --    --
Fixed charges of unconsolidated subsidiaries ......................   --    --
                                                                    ----- -----
    Fixed charges as defined ...................................... $  44 $  31
                                                                    ===== =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ................................ 2.30x 3.52x
                                                                    ===== =====
</TABLE>
TS- ASLT60

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter

– Manufacture and Processing
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4629-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Connecticut; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-4629-DR), dated October 30, 2021, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued February 2, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Connecticut is hereby amended to include the Public 
Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined 
to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster 
by the President in his declaration of October 30, 2021.

    Fairfield and Litchfield Counties for Public Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04586 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Faronte Antonio MCDUFFIE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4721

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 25, 2017

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, First Assistant United States Attorney, Donald R. Pender, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Faronte Antonio McDuffie appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a sentence of 24 months of imprisonment. We affirm.

Because McDuffie did not challenge in the district court whether the court erred in classifying his marijuana-related conduct as a Grade A supervised release violation, we review this issue for plain error. *See United States v. McNeal,*818 F.3d 141, 148 (4th Cir. 2016).

Conduct constituting a controlled substance offense is a Grade A supervised release violation. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7Bl.l(a)(l)(ii) (2016). A “controlled substance offense” is defined as an offense punishable by imprisonment of more than one year prohibiting, among other things, possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. USSG § 4B1.2(b). Under North Carolina law, marijuana is a Schedule VI controlled sub*765stance. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-94(1) (2015). Possession of a Schedule VI controlled substance with intent to sell and deliver is a Class I felony. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(a), (b)(2) (2015). A Class I felony is punishable by imprisonment of up to 13 months. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.17(c), (d) (2015).

McDuffie was charged with possession of marijuana with intent to sell and deliver, in violation of North Carolina law, and the district court found that McDuffie’s conduct supported the charge. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not plainly err in classifying McDuffie’s marijuana-related conduct as a Grade A supervised release violation. *See McNeal,*818 F.3d at 148.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002,


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The
undersigned, Xiqun Yu, is Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
TIA II, Inc. (the “Company”). This statement is being furnished in connection
with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”).




By
execution of this statement, we certify that:




The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
Report.




This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.




It is not
intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:January
      13, 2011
                /s/ Xiqun YuXiqun
      Yu
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Alexandra HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No, 16-41625 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

*837Lesley Anne Woods, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Daniel Alexandra Hernandez, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Alexandra Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*6th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Nicolas AQUINO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; Ivan Rodriguez, an individual, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16-16815

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed October 11, 2017

Nina M. Patane, Andrea C. Avila, Pa-tane Gumberg Avila, LLP, Salinas, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael R. Philippi, Esquire, Deputy County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel, County of Monterey, Salinas, CA, for Defendants-Appellants

Before: KOZINSKI and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, * Distinct Judge.

*

 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Summary judgment was denied on defendant-appellant Ivan Rodriguez’s claims of qualified immunity because the district court found genuine issues of material fact remained unresolved concerning each claim. We agree and thus affirm.

Plaintiff-appellee Nicolas Aquino moved this court to impose sanctions against Rodriguez for filing a frivolous appeal. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 38 (“[I]f a court of appeals determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may, after a separately filed motion or notice from the court and reasonable opportunity to respond, award just damages and single or double costs to the appel-lee.”). “ ‘An appeal is considered frivolous if the result is obvious or the appellant’s arguments are wholly without merit.’ ” *Ingle v. Circuit City,*408 F.3d 592, 595 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting *Adriana Int’l Corp. v. Thoeren,*913 F.2d 1406, 1417 (9th Cir. 1990)).

The request for sanctions in Aquino’s answering brief does not provide Rodriguez sufficient notice. *See Higgins v. Vortex Fishing Sys., Inc.,*379 F.3d 701, 709 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A request made in an appellate brief does not satisfy Rule 38....” (quoting *State of Cal. Emp’t Dev. Dep’t v. Taxel (In re Del Mission Ltd.),*98 F.3d 1147, 1154 (9th Cir. 1996))). However, we may,. *sua sponte,*impose sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal under Rule 38 “after ... notice from the court and reasonable opportunity to respond.” Fed. R. App. P. 38. We order Rodriguez to show cause in writing, within 14 days' after this memorandum disposition is filed, why we should not award attorneys’ fees and double costs to Aquino under Rule 38—includ-ing addressing the questions raised at oral argument about Rodriguez’s potentially frivolous positions. Aquino may file a reply within 14 days after service of Rodriguez’s response.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”) I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, thegeneral partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 14,  2009                   |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial Officer                       |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
#### Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Limited, Appellant, *v.*Otis Elevator Company, Respondent.

Submitted October 4, 1943;

decided October 14, 1943.

*663*Arthur K. Wing*and *James G. Purdy*for motion.

*Bertrand L. Pettigrew*and *Ghauncey L. Grant*opposed.

Motion dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the application was not made within the time specified in section 592, subdivision 3, of the Civil Practice Act. *(Pollak*v. *Port Morris Bank,*257 N. Y. 287, 288; *Low*v. *Bankers Trust Co.,*265 N. Y. 264, 265; *Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.*v. *Public Nat. Bank & Trust Co.,*262 N. Y. 614.)*

*

 See, also, *Morris*v. *Chemical Bank & Trust Co.*(291 N. Y. 646).— [Rep.
#### Bethany L. DUBROC; Roger Dubroc, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. WAL-MART LOUISIANA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee

No. 16-31249

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 26, 2017

Richard Alan Rozanski, Esq., Wheelis & Rozanski, A.P.L.C., Alexandria, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Robert O’Neal Chadwick, Jr., Counsel, Gregory Brent Odom, II, Chadwick *&*Odom, L.L.C., Alexandria, LA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The plaintiff suffered a slip-and-fall in a Wal-Mart store during a rainstorm. In her resulting lawsuit, the district court granted summary judgment for Wal-Mart because she could not show any evidence that Wal-Mart either created or had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition that caused her injury, as is required under Louisiana negligence law. We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court in its November 29,2016 Memorandum Ruling.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Michigan Supreme** 

**Court**

**Lansing, Michigan**

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 13, 2015 

# Order

January 13, 2015

149948 & ( 21 )

STEPHANIE LAWSON

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

ANTHONY NAM and NAM BUILDING

MANAGEMENT COMPANY

, Defendant s

- Appell ants

. SC: 149948

COA: 320523

Washtenaw CC: 12

- 000182

- NO

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs or fees to either

party.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6968 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6968

 To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give marriage 
  and family therapists participating in the National Health Service 
 Corps Loan Repayment Program the option of completing a postgraduate 
  degree clinical training program that is accredited by the State in 
    which the program is located in lieu of such a program that is 
 accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family 
                           Therapy Education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2024

   Mr. Harder of California introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to give marriage 
  and family therapists participating in the National Health Service 
 Corps Loan Repayment Program the option of completing a postgraduate 
  degree clinical training program that is accredited by the State in 
    which the program is located in lieu of such a program that is 
 accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Marriage and Family 
                           Therapy Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bringing More Therapists to the 
Valley Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MARRIAGE AND FAMILY 
              THERAPISTS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE 
              CORPS LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    In issuing or updating guidance for the National Health Service 
Corps Loan Repayment Program under section 338B of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1), the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services, acting through the Administrator of the Health Resources and 
Services Administration, shall give participants who are marriage and 
family therapists the option of completing a postgraduate degree 
clinical training program in marriage and family therapy that is 
accredited by the State in which the program is located in lieu of such 
a program that is accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for 
Marriage and Family Therapy Education.
                                 <all>
```
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/12/2011 04:52 PM 

Subject: FW: Investors Support Clean Air Rules - 32 Investors with 

over 

$28.6 Billion in Combined Assets Urge Timely Implementation 

Hi Bob, 

Consistent with the EO, please see the attached letter that was sent to 

us. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

From: Angela Bonarrigo [mailto:bonarrigo@ceres.org] 

Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 3:40 PM 

To: Sunstein, Cass R. 

Cc: Higgins, Cortney; Hertz, Jessica R.; Angela Bonarrigo; Mindy Lubber; 

Dan Bakal 

Subject: Investors Support Clean Air Rules - 32 Investors with over $28.6 

Billion in Combined Assets Urge Timely Implementation 

 

Dear Mr. Sunstein, 

 

Please find attached a letter on behalf of 32 Ceres investor partners 

with over $28.6 billion in combined assets under management. The letter 

encourages timely implementation of the CSAPR and the Utility MACT rules; 

highlighting that the two rules will create jobs and that a majority of 

the nation's electricity generating fleet is prepared and ready to 

comply. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

Best, 

Angela 

 

Angela Bonarrigo 

Director, Washington DC Office 

Ceres 

 

1101 14th Street, NW | Suite 1200 

Washington DC 20005 

p. 202-480-2127 x 1013 

m. 617-816-9102 

www.ceres.org 

 

 

Investor Letter to Senate on EPA 12Dec11.pdf