alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
         EXTRACTED FROM THE EAGLES NEST MINING COMPANY FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
         QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
         STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       8,970
<OTHER-SE>                                   (8,970)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5869 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to require the National Credit 

Union Administration Board to provide a rationale for any amounts 

the Board proposes to use from the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2016 

Mr. MULVANEY (for himself and Mr. HECK of Washington) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to require the 

National Credit Union Administration Board to provide 

a rationale for any amounts the Board proposes to use 

from the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUND TRANSPARENCY. 

4 Section 203 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

5 U.S.C. 1783) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(g) FUND TRANSPARENCY.— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5869 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Board shall accom2 pany each annual budget submitted pursuant to sec3 tion 209(b) with a report containing— 

4 ‘‘(A) a detailed analysis of how the ex5 penses of the Administration are assigned be6 tween prudential activities and insurance-re7 lated activities and the extent to which those 

8 expenses are paid from the fees collected pursu9 ant to section 105 or from the Fund; and 

10 ‘‘(B) the Board’s supporting rationale for 

11 any proposed use of amounts in the Fund con12 tained in such budget, including detailed break13 downs and supporting rationales for any such 

14 proposed use related to titles of this Act other 

15 than this title. 

16 ‘‘(2) PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.—The Board shall 

17 make each report described under paragraph (1) 

18 available to the public.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 32001E0155 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001E0155

**Council Common Position of 26 February 2001 amending Common Position 2000/696/CFSP on the maintenance of specific restrictive measures directed against Mr Milosevic and persons associated with him and repealing Common Position 98/725/CFSP **

*
Official Journal L 057 , 27/02/2001 P. 0003 - 0004 *

Council Common Position

of 26 February 2001

amending Common Position 2000/696/CFSP on the maintenance of specific restrictive measures directed against Mr Milosevic and persons associated with him and repealing Common Position 98/725/CFSP

(2001/155/CFSP)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Common Position 2000/696/CFSP(1) maintained specific restrictive measures directed against the former President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), Mr Slobodan Milosevic and persons associated with him while lifting all other sanctions against the FRY imposed since 1998.

(2) In its conclusions of 22 January 2001, the Council welcomed the free and fair conditions in which the legislative elections in Serbia in December were held. Their outcome confirms the determination of the people of Serbia to continue the consolidation of democracy in their country.

(3) Restrictive measures should therefore be confined to the former President of the FRY, Mr Slobodan Milosevic, his family and persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("ICTY").

(4) Common Position 2000/696/CFSP should be amended accordingly.

(5) Common Position 98/725/CFSP of 14 December 1998 on restrictive measures to be taken against persons in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia acting against the independent media(2) should be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS COMMON POSITION:

Article 1

Common Position 2000/696/CFSP is amended as follows:

1. Article 1 shall be replaced by the following:

"Article 1

1. The ban on the issue of visas referred to in Article 4 of Common Position 98/240/CFSP and Article 1 of Common Position 1999/318/CFSP shall be confined to the former President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), Mr Slobodan Milosevic, his family and persons indicted by the ICTY resident in the FRY, as identified in the Annex.

2. Exemptions may be made in cases where the issuing of a visa is necessary for the indictee to appear before the ICTY.

3. The list of persons identified in the Annex shall be updated by means of a Council implementing decision."

2. The Annex shall be replaced by the following:

"ANNEX

>TABLE>".

Article 2

Common Position 98/725/CFSP shall be repealed.

Article 3

This Common Position shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Article 4

This Common Position shall be published in the Official Journal.

Done at Brussels, 26 February 2001.

For the Council

The President

A. Lindh

(1) OJ L 287, 14.11.2000, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 345, 19.12.1998, p. 1. Common Position as amended by Common Position 2000/696/CFSP.
#### Eric Stephen GERENCSER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-70134

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*763Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 30, 2017

Eric Stephen Gerencser, Pro Se

Jacob Earl Christensen, Richard Far-ber, Esquire, Supervisory Attorney, Douglas Campbell Rennie, Attorney, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eric Stephen Gerencser appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision, following a bench trial, upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of deficiencies and penalties for the tax years 2010 and 2011. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo conclusions of law and for clear error questions of fact. *Hardy v. Comm’r,*181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly determined that Gerencser was not entitled to the foreign tax credit for tax years 2010 and 2011 because Gerencser had not paid any foreign taxes, and he failed to establish that he had accrued any foreign tax liability. *See*26 U.S.C. §§ 901, 905 (explaining the foreign tax credit). Contrary to Gerenc-ser’s contention, the Tax Court did not err in failing to shift the burden of proof to the Commissioner because Gerencser failed to provide credible evidence. *See id.*§ 7491(a) (requirements for shifting burden of proof to Commissioner); *see also Hardy,*181 F.3d at 1004-05 (describing the general burden of proof in deficiency cases).

The Tax Court properly determined that Gerencser was liable for accuracy-related penalties because Gerencser was negligent in claiming both the foreign tax credit and the foreign earned income exclusion, and he failed to establish reasonable cause and good faith. *See*26 U.S.C. §§ 6662 (accuracy-related penalty imposed when underpayment is substantial or due to taxpayer’s negligence); 26 U.S.C. § 6664(c)(1) (penalty should not be imposed for underpayment where reasonable cause and good faith are demonstrated); *see also Sparkman v. Comm’r,*509 F.3d 1149, 1161 (9th Cir. 2007) (defining negligence as any failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the Internal Revenue Code).

We reject as without merit Gerencser’s contentions regarding his NATO wages, the preclusive effect of his tax case from tax year 2009, the applicability of the tax treaty between the United States and Germany, and whether he received due process.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings as
reported on the first quarter for 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such finanicial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                         289,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,209,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,788,000
<PP&E>                                       5,821,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,626,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,067,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,683,000
<BONDS>                                      1,229,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,565,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,067,000
<SALES>                                      2,166,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,166,000
<CGS>                                        1,505,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07





</TABLE>
From: Kenneth Winder [mailto:kwinder@mleainc.com]

Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 9:55 PM

To: Richard Parker

Cc: Rosenstock, Steven; Christopher Bolduc; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.co m; adelaski@standardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; Aris Marantan; artrosenfeld@gmail.com; august.esch@ gmail.com; BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Brian Coffey; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpaci fic.com; Caitlin Johnson; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; chad.kennedy@us.schneider-electric.com; charlied@uss.org; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; Cla_Silcox@nema.org; cstephens@neea.org; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; dave.millure@metglas.com; DYoung@energy-solution .com; eduardorobles@eaton.com; gbf1@pge.com; gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; greg.coulter405 @gmail.com; James.Lass@cleco.com; Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.com; Jeremiah.Freeman@e e.doe.gov; jerry.corkran @cooperindustries.com; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; jhodge@howard-ind.com; Jim.creevy@nema.org; Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov; jmauer@standardsasap.org; Joh_Caskey@nema.org; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; jrossetti@mlgw.org; kcoughlin@lbl.gov; maheshsampat@bellsouth.net; mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com; Matthew Nardotti; mhyland@appanet.org; Michael Rivest; mwaltner@nrd c.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; phil@pjharter.com; phopkinson@hvolt.com; pkumar@publicpower. org; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com; rick.anderson@fayp wc.com; robert.saint@nreca.coop; rroy@nrdc.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com; snadel@aceee.org; tba llo@earthjustice.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com; vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; Zhimei Luo Subject: Re: More Pole Change-out Data



### Mr. Parker and Committee: Two additional Cooperative es timates for the cost of a pole change-out are attached. They are respectively: 1. $1,703.86 for a pole in a three-phase line, and 2. $1,380.27 for a pole in a single-phase line and $2,944.91 for a pole in a three-phase line. Additionally, a North Carolina Cooperative estimates $3,470 for change-out of a pole in a three-phase line.

Ken

--



## Kenneth A. Winder, P.E.
Manager-Engineering

Moon Lake Electric Association 800 W Hwy 40

PO Box 278

Roosevelt UT 84066

435.722.5406 Office

435.724.1539 Cell

435.722.5466 Fax

E-Mail: kwinder@mleainc.com

Web Site: www.mleainc.com
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0603 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0603

**Commission Decision of 8 July 2002 on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Coal and Steel Community and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in certain steel products (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2002) 2482) **

*
Official Journal L 195 , 24/07/2002 P. 0054 - 0054 *

Commission Decision

of 8 July 2002

on the conclusion of an agreement between the European Coal and Steel Community and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in certain steel products

(notified under document number C(2002) 2482)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2002/603/ECSC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 95 thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the Consultative Committee,

After the unanimous assent of the Council,

Whereas:

(1) Following the Council Decision of 19 November 2001, the Commission opened negotiations with the Government of the Russian Federation, culminating in an Agreement concerning trade in certain steel products covered by the European Coal and Steel Community;

(2) The Agreement establishes quantitative limits for the entry into free circulation in the Community of certain steel products for the years 2002 to 2004,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1. The Agreement with the Government of the Russian Federation concerning trade in certain steel products is hereby approved on behalf of the European Coal and Steel Community.

2. The text of the Agreement(1) is annexed to this Decision.

Article 2

The Commissioner responsible for Trade, or the person he designates for this purpose, is empowered to sign the Agreement referred to in Article 1 in order to bind the European Coal and Steel Community.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2002.

For the Commission

Pascal Lamy

Member of the Commission

(1) See page 55 of this Official Journal.
ARTWORK & BEYOND


                                                 631-471-0065 - Fax 631-471-6741
                                        761-D Coates Avenue - Holbrook, NY 11741



Supply Agreement

This agreement dated May 29,2002, is made between Artwork & Beyond, Inc., and
Ross Galleries, LLC.

Ross will act as a contract manufacturer for A&B. As a contract manufacturer,
Ross agrees to frame and pack artwork for shipping, based upon the acceptance of
a purchase order(s) submitted by A&B.

Ross Galleries LLC. Agrees to charge A&B the following:

-   33% above Ross's cost for framing services on unframed items delivered by
    A&B to Ross.
-   42% of opening bid for items mutually identified as art express pieces.
-   2.75% per box for packing.

Ross Galleries LLC may change the above terms upon 30 days written notice.
In the event Ross Galleries LLC wishes to terminate this agreement, 30 days
notice will be given to Artwork & Beyond.



Robert Danker                                       Howard Blum

/s/ Robert Danker                                   /s/ Howard Blum
Ross Galleries, LLC.                                Artwork & Beyond, Inc.









               WWW.ARTinaClick.com - WWW.ArtAuctionFundraiser.com
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.



I, Raymond L. Arthur, Chief Financial Officer of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|/s/    Raymond L. Arthur                                                      
|Raymond L. Arthur                                                             
|Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|September 13, 2005
August 8, 2016

Mr. Joshua Stephen

Joshua Stephen

2 Dutchess Court

Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

Re: FAA–2016–3445

Dear Mr. Stephen:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
#### In the MATTER OF: Robert W. HUNT, M.D., DBA Intercommunity Medical Group, Debtor. *587Peli Popovich Hunt, Appellant, v. Peter C. Anderson, United States Trustee; David M. Goodrich, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees.

No. 16-55646

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017*

Filed July 5, 2017

Peli Popovich Hunt, Pro Se

Dare Law, Trial Attorney, Hatty Yip, Office of the U.S. Trustee, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee Peter C. Anderson

David Gould, Esquire, Gould & Gould LLP, Calabasas, CA, for Appellee David M. Goodrich

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Peli Popovich Hunt appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing Hunt’s bankruptcy appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court’s pre-filing order entered against a vexatious litigant. *In re Fillbach,*223 F.3d 1089, 1090-91 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

In her opening brief, Hunt fails to address how the district court erred by dismissing her bankruptcy appeal for filing the appeal in violation of the district court’s pre-filing order. As a result, Hunt has waived her challenge, to the district court’s order. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); *Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.”).

Because we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Hunt’s bankruptcy appeal, we do not consider her arguments challenging bankruptcy court orders.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

We, John N. Hatsopoulos,Chief Executive Officer, and Anthony S. Loumidis, Chief FinancialOfficer, of American DG Energy Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report on Form10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d)); and

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 30, 2007     |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ John  N. Hatsopoulos |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| /s/  Anthony S. Loumidis |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----