alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | March      4, 2010 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY U FUND, LLC               |
|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |               | By:    |   | /s/    | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |               |   |   | Name:  | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |               |   |   | Title: | Chief      Executive Officer                              |
|   |               |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |               |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: | March      4, 2010 |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |               | By:    |   | /s/    | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |               |   |   | Name:  | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |               |   |   | Title: | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |               |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |               |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |               |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

              CASE CREDIT CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (dollars in millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Three Months Ended     Three Months Ended
                                                                          March 31, 2002         March 31, 2001
                                                                          --------------         --------------
<S>                                                                     <C>                    <C>
Net income (loss) ....................................................        $  1                     $ (8)
Add:
  Interest expense ...................................................          39                       52
  Income tax (benefit) expense and other taxes on (loss) income ......          --                       (4)
                                                                             -----                    -----
    Earnings as defined ..............................................        $ 40                     $ 40
                                                                             =====                    =====

Interest expense .....................................................        $ 39                     $ 52
                                                                             -----                    -----
    Fixed charges as defined .........................................        $ 39                     $ 52
                                                                             =====                    =====

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...................................       1.03x                     .77x
                                                                             =====                    =====
</TABLE>

                                       16
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0877 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0877

**2001/877/EC: Council Decision of 24 September 2001 on the signing and conclusion on behalf of the European Community of the International Coffee Agreement 2001 **

*
Official Journal L 326 , 11/12/2001 P. 0022 - 0022 *

Council Decision

of 24 September 2001

on the signing and conclusion on behalf of the European Community of the International Coffee Agreement 2001

(2001/877/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133, in conjunction with Article 300(1), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1) The International Coffee Council approved the text of the International Coffee Agreement 2001 by Resolution No 393 of 28 September 2000.

(2) This new Agreement has been negotiated to replace the International Coffee Agreement 1994 which was extended to 30 September 2001.

(3) The International Coffee Agreement 2001 is open for signature and deposit of the instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval up to 25 September 2001.

(4) The Community is a member of the 1994 International Agreement, as extended, and it is therefore in its interest to approve the agreement which replaces it.

(5) Notwithstanding the exclusive Community competence in this matter, and in order to avoid certain temporary operational difficulties, it is appropriate to authorise the Member States to conclude the Agreement at the same time as the Community and to participate on a temporary basis in the new arrangement.

(6) Member States should ensure that the Community's participation in the Agreement is regularised in accordance with the applicable Treaty provisions,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The International Coffee Agreement 2001 is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is authorised to designate the person authorised to sign the Agreement and deposit the instrument of approval on behalf of the Community by 25 September 2001.

Article 3

The Community and the Member States shall ensure that, within a year from its entry into force, the provisions of the International Coffee Agreement which create operational difficulties for the sole Community membership are amended.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2001.

For the Council

The President

L. Michel
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                    CASE CREDIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Nine
                                                                      Months
                                                                       Ended
                                                                     September
                                                                        30,
                                                                     ----------
                                                                     1999  1998
                                                                     ----  ----
<S>                                                                  <C>   <C>
Net income.......................................................... $ 63  $ 62
Add:
  Interest expense..................................................  141   103
  Amortization of capitalized debt expense..........................    2     1
  Income tax expense and other taxes on income......................   36    34
                                                                     ----  ----
    Earnings as defined............................................. $242  $200
                                                                     ====  ====
Interest expense.................................................... $141  $103
Amortization of capitalized debt expense............................    2     1
                                                                     ----  ----
    Fixed charges as defined........................................ $143  $104
                                                                     ====  ====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.................................. 1.69x 1.92x
                                                                     ====  ====
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Partnership Executive
       1. Term
  2. Duties and Status
  Exclusive Employment provided




---



##### 



3. Compensation and Benefits




---



##### 



provided,
however
  4. Non-Competition; Confidential Information




---



##### 



5. Termination of Employment




---



##### 



6. Payment Upon Termination




---



##### 



th




---



##### 








---



##### 



provided, however,




---



##### 








---



##### 



7. Compliance with Other Agreements by Executive
  8. Miscellaneous
   If to the Executive
 
 If to the Partnership




---



##### 



9. Code Section 409A.
 vesting




---



##### 



provided,
however




---



##### 



SUBURBAN PROPANE, L.P.By:
    /s/ HAROLD R. LOGAN, JR.Name:
    Harold R. Logan, Jr.Title:
    Chairman of the Board/s/ MARK A. ALEXANDERMark A. Alexander
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy Joe COLLINS, a/k/a B.J., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6895

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 2017

Decided: September 28, 2017

Billy Joe Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Joe Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, construing his self-styled “Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to [Fed. R. Civ. P.] 60(b)” as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d *786931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Collins’ notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

> (1) newly discovered evidence that ... would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or

> (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to eases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Collins’ claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 23.1
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-109495) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-34156)
of deltathree, Inc. (the "Company"), our report, dated March 4, 2004, relating
to our audit of the financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2002
and 2003 and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, and 2003 contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel Aviv, Israel
March 29, 2004
#### Villa Mae SIMMONS, Appellant, v. MAISON BLANCHE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 22928.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1966.

Donald V. Organ, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Pat W. Browne, Jr., of Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before JONES and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant complains of charges given and of other charges refused at the trial in the district court. She asserts that the district court committed error in not excusing a juror for cause. We have reviewed the record and are unable to find reversible error. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
ON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2003  (the  "Report"), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/Allen E. Kahn
Dated:  May  15,  2003                  -----------------------------
                                        Allen  E.  Kahn
                                        Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-Q  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.






                                                                      Exhibit 99
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 15  INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
            INFORMATION


October 21, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington DC  20549

RE:   GA Financial, Inc.
      1.  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-37837)
      2.  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-66107)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that our report dated October 21, 1998 on our review of interim
financial information of GA Financial, Inc. for the three month and nine month
periods ended September 30, 1998 and included in GA Financial, Inc.'s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period then ended is incorporated by reference in
the registration statements referred to above. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the
registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 20, 2008



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Allen E. Kahn      
| | Allen E. Kahn          
| | Chief Financial Officer





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of FSP 50 South Tenth Street
Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his
knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











Date:  March
      11, 2009
            /s/ George J.
      CarterGeorge
      J. CarterPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management Renewals

    The NSF management officials having responsibility for three 
advisory committees listed below have determined that renewing these 
groups for another two years is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Director, 
National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This 
determination follows consultation with the Committee Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Committees:

Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education, #9487
Proposal Review Panel for Industrial Innovations and Partnerships, 
#28164
Proposal Review Panel for Emerging Frontiers and Multidisciplinary 
Activities #34558

    Effective date for renewal is March 2, 2022. For more information, 
please contact Crystal Robinson, NSF, at (703) 292-8687.

    Dated: March 2, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-04701 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Project Development Pacific, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Darryl Mills, CEO and CAO of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Darryl Mills                               ***

Darryl Mills, CEO, CAO

Dated: April 2, 2007
Exhibit 34.2

Exhibit C

(logo) Grant Thornton

Accountants and Business Advisors


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors and Shareholders
LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage backed
securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment
provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform") as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x) and
1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Irvine, CA
February 20, 2007


18400 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92612-0525
T 949.553.1600
F 949.553.0168
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US member of Grant Thornton International