alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 670

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the unauthorized

inspection of tax returns or tax return information.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. GLENN (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent

the unauthorized inspection of tax returns or tax return

information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Browsing

5 Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED INSPECTION OF TAX

7 RETURNS OR TAX RETURN INFORMATION.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part I of subchapter A of chapter

9 75 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to
2

•S 670 IS

1 crimes, other offenses, and forfeitures) is amended by add2 ing after section 7213 the following new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 7213A. UNAUTHORIZED INSPECTION OF RETURNS OR

4 RETURN INFORMATION.

5 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—It shall be unlawful for—

6 ‘‘(1) any officer or employee of the United

7 States or any former such officer or employee,

8 ‘‘(2) any person described in section 6103(n),

9 an officer or employee of any such person, or any

10 former such officer or employee, or

11 ‘‘(3) any person described in subsection (d),

12 (i)(3)(B)(i), (l) (6), (7), (8), (9), (10) or (12), or

13 (m) (2), (4), (6), or (7) of section 6103,

14 willfully to inspect (as defined in section 6103(b)(7)), ex15 cept as authorized by this title, any return or return infor16 mation (as defined in section 6103(b)).

17 ‘‘(b) PENALTY.—

18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Any violation of subsection

19 (a) shall be punishable upon conviction by a fine in

20 any amount not exceeding $1,000, or imprisonment

21 of not more than 1 year, or both, together with the

22 costs of prosecution.

23 ‘‘(2) FEDERAL OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES.—An

24 officer or employee of the United States who is con25 victed of any violation of subsection (a) shall, in ad-
3

•S 670 IS

1 dition to any other punishment, be dismissed from

2 office or discharged from employment.’’

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec4 tions for part I of subchapter A of chapter 75 of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting after

6 the item relating to section 7213 the following new item:

‘‘7213A. Unauthorized inspection of returns or return information.’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to violations occurring on and after

9 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA

Cause No. DA 22-0562

KILA SHEPHERD,

 Plaintiff/Appellant, 

vs. 

STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 

 Defendant/Appellee. 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Pursuant to Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time 

to file its response brief and good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee’s Motion is GRANTED. 

Appellee’s Response brief will be due on or before March 3, 2023.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 20 2023

01/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0562
**EXHIBIT 99.17**

VIA EDGAR 

**TO:**

**United States Securities and Exchange Commission**

**Re:**

**Asanko Gold Inc. (the "Company")**

**Annual Report on Form 40-F**

**Consent of Expert**

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the “**Annual Report**”), as filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2013 (the “**Annual Information Form**”).

I, Ross Cheyne, **DO HEREBY CONSENT**, to:

·

the use of my name and the disclosure of my involvement in the preparation of information that forms the basis for disclosure of a technical and scientific nature related to the Company’s Obotan Gold Project, Ghana, contained in the Annual Information Form, and

·

the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such information in the Annual Report.
Exhibit 4.4


                         AMENDMENT #2 TO PRIVATE EQUITY
                            LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT


                  This Amendment #2 to Private  Equity Line of Credit  Agreement
("Amendment  #2"),  dated as of June 1, 2002,  is by and between  Prima  Capital
Growth Fund LLC. ("Prima") and Hand Brand Distribution, Inc.

Amendment #2 hereby amends the Private  Equity Line of Credit  Agreement  ("PELC
Agreement")  between the parties  dated as of January 16, 2002 and the Amendment
to the PELC Agreement dated March 4, 2002 (the "Amendment #1").

         The PELC Agreement and Amendment #1 are amended as follows:

         (1)      Paragraph one of Amendment #1 is deleted in its entirety.

         (2)      Pursuant to the PELC Agreement, as amended, the deadline for a
                  registration  statement  on  Form  S-1  or  Form  SB-2  to  be
                  effective is hereby extended until September 30, 2002.

         (3)      The  deadlines  for (a) the payment of the  Commitment  Fee as
                  such term is defined in the PELC  Agreement and (b) the option
                  to convert to common  stock,  are hereby  extended to November
                  30, 2002.

All other terms and  conditions  of the PELC  Agreement  and  Amendment  #1 not
otherwise amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have  executed  this  Agreement as of the date
above written.
                                              Prima Capital Growth Fund LLC

                                              By: /s/ Gary Morgan
                                                  -----------------------

                                              Name:   Gary Morgan
                                                  -----------------------

                                              Title:  Manager
                                                  -----------------------


                                              Hand Brand Distribution Inc.

                                              By: /s/ Nicolas Wollner
                                                  -----------------------

                                              Name:   Nicolas Wollner
                                                  -----------------------

                                              Title:  President
                                                  -----------------------
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September. 30, 2010 of Kat Racing, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Kenny ThatcherKenny ThatcherChief Executive Officer/s/ Kenny ThatcherKenny ThatcherChief Financial OfficerDated: January, 28, 2011   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Kat Racing, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-149583 of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. on Form S-3 of our reports
dated March 2, 2009 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the financial statements
of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. from the separate records maintained by
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.), relating to the financial statements of
Duncan Energy Partners L.P. and the effectiveness of Duncan Energy Partners
L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Duncan Energy Partners L.P. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.











/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Houston,
Texas


March 2,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MINDSPRING ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 21, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,492
<INVENTORY>                                        123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,477
<PP&E>                                          75,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,628
<CGS>                                           21,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,210)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6031 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6031

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2016

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Prevention Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR FEDERAL FUNDING UNDER 
              THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972.

    Section 304(4) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 
U.S.C. 1453(4)) is amended by inserting ``the District of Columbia,'' 
after ``the term also includes''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rick Lee EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-11651

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(August 29, 2017)

*618Ramona Albin, Michael B. Billingsley, Daniel J. Fortune, Jacquelyn Mather Hut-zell, Praveen S. Krishna, Joyce White Vance, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Sabra M. Barnett, Kevin L. Butler, Federal Public Defender, Birmingham, AL, Deanna Lee Oswald, Federal Public Defender—NAL, Huntsville, AL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WILSON and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges, and WOOD,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Lisa Wood, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Rick Lee Evans appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c) for aggravated sexual abuse of a child under twelve. A jury found that he molested the child of an American soldier while the soldier was deployed in Iraq, and the district court sentenced him to 660 months’ imprisonment.

Evans challenges (1) the sufficiency of his indictment, (2) the district court’s denial of his request to subpoena notes taken by the victim’s therapist, (3) the district court’s exclusion of certain expert testimony, and (4) the district court’s admission of testimony about child pornography found on electronic devices seized from him. But after careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error,

AFFIRMED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27

          Financial Data Schedule

 "This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from September 30, 2000 10QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements."
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEPTEMBER-30-2000
<CASH>                                         81,321
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    12,278,953
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         49,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,388)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,082,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        16,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,562
<COMMON>                                       49,730
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,998,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,082,490
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,428)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .000


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernesto ROJAS-MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41579 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ernesto Rojas-Macias, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto Rojas-Macias has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Macias has .not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Neibert, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  February
      16, 2010
              By:
              /s/ David W.
      NeibertDavid
      W. NeibertChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004990
<NAME> N/A
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  185,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,400
<INVENTORY>                                     38,568
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,683
<PP&E>                                          94,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 637,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,078
<BONDS>                                        310,028
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           210
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   637,724
<SALES>                                        533,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               533,976
<CGS>                                          424,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,204
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,326
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (52,717)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,717)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.50)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2006-20
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-20


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.



/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Harris *v.*Whittle, sheriff.

No. 13435.

September 24, 1940.

Rehearing denied October 15, 1940.

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. The writ of habeas corpus is an available remedy for release of one illegally restrained of his liberty. Code, § 50-101. Detention by arrest under a bench warrant based on an indictment regular upon its face (§ 27-801) is not illegal; and consequently the writ of habeas corpus is not available for discharge of one so arrested. § 50-116 (3). See 29 C. J. 45, § 37; *Holder*v. *Beavers,*141 *Ga.*217 (2) (80 S. E. 715); *Jackson*v. *Lowry,*170 *Ga.*755 (154 S. E. 228). The judge did not err in refusing to discharge the accused on writ of habeas corpus.

. 2. It is unnecessary to pass on other assignments of error in reference to the right of the State to place a person on trial under an indictment for robbery by force, where such person had been previously acquitted under an indictment for murder committed during an attempted robbery, based on the same facts, and dependent for conviction upon the same evidence as was depended upon in the trial for murder.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*851
      *Pierce Brothers, Benjamin B. Pierce Jr.,*and *0. Franklin Pierce,*for plaintiff.

*George Hains*and *J. Cecil Davis, solicitors-general,*for defendant.