alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7395** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DERRICK LAMONT EVANS, a/k/a Shank, a/k/a Dechee Dan, a/k/a Big Head, a/k/a Debo , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00024

- JPJ

- RSB

- 1 )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Derrick Lamont Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zacha ry T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Mary Kathleen Carnell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Lamont Evans appeals the district court ’ s order denying Evans’ 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Evans , No. 1:08

- cr - 00024

- JPJ

- RSB

- 1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2 015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 739 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 739

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade for the vessel SISU, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 1995

 Mr. Packwood introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
      coastwise trade for the vessel SISU, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46, United 
States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. 
U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for 
the vessel SISU, United States official number 293648.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

d0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

138799(31) 

SANDRA CANTLEY, Personal 

Representative of the Estate of 

James Cantley, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138799 

 COA: 288800 

Genesee CC: 07-085696-NO 

GENESEE COUNTY ROAD 

COMMISSION, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

______________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 9, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6337 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to the definition of 

urbanized area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Mr. WEBER of Texas (for himself, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. GENE GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BABIN, and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to 

the definition of urbanized area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF URBANIZED AREA. 

4 Section 5302(23) of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6337 IH

1 ‘‘(B) ADDITIONAL AREAS.—Notwith2 standing subparagraph (A), an area shall be 

3 treated as an ‘urbanized area’ if the Secretary 

4 of Commerce determines that— 

5 ‘‘(i) the area was defined and des6 ignated in a previous decennial census as 

7 an ‘urbanized area’; 

8 ‘‘(ii) the area was not defined and 

9 designated in the most recent decennial 

10 census as an ‘urbanized area’ as the result 

11 of a natural disaster that caused the popu12 lation of the area to fall below 50,000 peo13 ple; and 

14 ‘‘(iii) the most recent annual estimate 

15 of the Bureau of the Census estimates the 

16 population of the area to be restored to 

17 50,000 or more people.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
#### IN RE: William H. RADCLIFFE, Appellant

2017-1069

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 8, 2017

Mathew Perrons, Jr., Law Office of Mathew R. P. Perrone, Jr., Algonquin, IL, argued for appellant.

Amy J. Nelson, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by Nathan K Kelley, Thomas W. Krause, Jeremiah Helm.

(Moore, Chen, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of East Bridge Investment Group Corporation,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Keith Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





EASTBRIDGE
INVESTMENT GROUP CORPORATION


By /s/ Keith
Wong


Keith
Wong


Chairman,
CEO


March 14,
2008
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Bounded by Farragut Road, East 40th Street, Foster Avenue and Albany Avenue in the Borough of Brooklyn, for Park Purposes. Lily B. Cortelyou et al., Appellants.

Argued May 20, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*503
      *George Schenker*and *Edwin A. McGuire*for appellants.

*Robert E. Schaffer, Acting Corporation Counsel (Reuben Levy, Julius Isaacs*and *Joseph S. Deutsch*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Thaoheb, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6926 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6926

To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal penalty 
        for interfering with commerce by blocking public roads.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2024

 Mr. Rouzer (for himself, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Hudson) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal penalty 
        for interfering with commerce by blocking public roads.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe and Open Streets Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIME OF INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY BLOCKING PUBLIC ROADS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1951 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Interference With Commerce by Blocking Public Roads.--
            ``(1) Offense.--It shall be unlawful to, in any way or 
        degree, purposely obstruct, delay, or affect commerce or the 
        movement of any article or commodity in commerce by blocking a 
        public road or highway, or to attempt or conspire so to do.
            ``(2) Penalty.--Any person who violates paragraph (1) shall 
        be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or 
        both.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section heading.--The heading of section 1951 of title 
        18, United States Code, is amended by striking ``by threats or 
        violence''.
            (2) Table of sections.--The table of sections for chapter 
        95 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
        item relating to section 1951 and inserting the following:

``1951. Interference with commerce.''.
            (3) Cross references.--
                    (A) Title 5, united states code.--Section 
                8332(o)(2)(B)(xx) of title 5, United States Code, is 
                amended by striking ``by threats of violence''.
                    (B) Title 18, united states code.--Part I of title 
                18, United States Code, is amended--
                            (i) in section 1961(1), by striking ``, 
                        robbery, or extortion''; and
                            (ii) in section 2516(1)(c), by striking 
                        ``by threats or violence''.
                                 <all>
```
#### President and Directors of the Manhattan Company, Appellant, v. Bankers Trust Company, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Submitted January 8, 1943;

decided February 25, 1943.

*551
      *James J. Milligan*for appellant.

*J. Adam Murphy*and *Adrian D. Stevenson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
# EUR-Lex - 32002D0622(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32002D0622(01)

**Council Decision of 13 June 2002 amending the Council Decision of 27 March 2000 authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU related bodies **

*
Official Journal C 150 , 22/06/2002 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Council Decision

of 13 June 2002

amending the Council Decision of 27 March 2000 authorising the Director of Europol to enter into negotiations on agreements with third States and non-EU related bodies

(2002/C 150/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Article 42(2), Article 10(4) and Article 18 of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention)(1),

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing Europol's external relations with third States and non-European Union related bodies(2), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 3 November 1998 laying down rules governing the receipt of information by Europol from third parties(3), and in particular Article 2 of that Act,

Having regard to the Council Act of 12 March 1999 adopting the rules governing the transmission of personal data by Europol to third States and third bodies(4), and in particular Articles 2 and 3 of that Act,

Whereas:

(1) Operational requirements and the need to combat in an effective way organised forms of criminality through Europol, especially the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, require that Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) be added to the list of third States with whom the Director of Europol is authorised to start negotiations.

(2) Council Decision of 27 March 2000(5) should therefore be amended,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Council Decision of 27 March 2000 is hereby amended as follows:

In Article 2(1):

(a) under the heading "Third States", the following indent shall be added, before Bolivia: "- Albania";

(b) under the heading "Third States", the following indent shall be added, between Bolivia and Bulgaria: "- Bosnia and Herzegovina";

(c) under the heading "Third States", the following indent shall be added, between Colombia and Cyprus: "- Croatia";

(d) under the heading "Third States", the following indent shall be added, between Estonia and Hungary: "- Federal Republic of Yugoslavia"

"- Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)".

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg on 13 June 2002.

For the Council

The President

M. Rajoy Brey

(1) OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 2.

(2) OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 19.

(3) OJ C 26, 30.1.1999, p. 17.

(4) OJ C 88, 30.3.1999, p. 1.

(5) OJ C 106, 13.4.2000, p. 1.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Saratoga Investment Corp. (the“Company”) for the annual period ended February 28, 2019, as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian L. Oberbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Henri J.Steenkamp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date: May 13, 2019 

 

/s/ CHRISTIAN L. OBERBECK
Christian L. Oberbeck*Chief Executive Officer*
 

/s/ HENRI J. STEENKAMP
Henri J. Steenkamp*Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer***
#### City Bank Farmers Trust Company et al., as Trustees, Respondents, *v.*Eugene T. Cannon et al., Defendants, and William B. Levet, as Guardian ad Litem for Charles A. Cannon, Jr., et al., Infants, Appellants.

Submitted January 18, 1943;

decided March 4, 1943.

*William B. Levet*for motion.

*C. Alexander Capron*opposed.

Motion dismissed on the ground that an appeal lies as of right.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource-Related Research Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         March 30, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandip Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health,  5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 292-0189,                         *sandip.bhattacharyya@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 24, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-04363 Filed 3-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60090

Summary Calendar

 

LARRY ROCHELL SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DON GRANT, Warden of Delta

Correctional Facility; OHAMZAH

BRIMAH, Doctor and Psychiatrist

at Delta Correctional Facility,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CV-272-D-D

- - - - - - - - - -

December 14, 2001

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Rochell Smith, Mississippi prisoner # 89754, appeals

from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in

favor of the defendants in Smith’s civil rights complaint brought

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Smith argues that the appellees

were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs

because: 1) the Delta Correctional Facility (DCF) is not a

medically adequate or proper facility in which to incarcerate him

because of his mental condition; and 2) the treatment and
No. 01-60090

-2-

medications he received at DCF were inadequate to fully address

his mental condition. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties,

and we conclude that the district court committed no reversible

error. Smith’s allegations do not meet his burden of producing

evidence showing the existence of a genuine issue for trial

regarding deliberate indifference because they amount to no more

than disagreement with his medical treatment, a claim not

actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920

F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
# SPAR Group, Inc.

# Certification of Chief
Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2006 (this
report), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the registrant), the undersigned
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.       
          The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       
          The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Robert G. Brown                            
| |                                                
| | Robert G. Brown,                               
| | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
| |                                                
| | Date: August 14, 2006                          

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be
retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Ex-3