alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5746 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5746

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit wellness programs 
      from sharing personally identifiable information related to 
        individuals' use of or prescriptions for contraceptives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2016

 Ms. DelBene (for herself, Ms. Slaughter, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Speier, 
   Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mrs. Capps, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Ms. 
  Edwards, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. 
Cicilline, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Gallego, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
 McGovern, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Murphy of Florida, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Swalwell 
of California, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Moore, Mr. Keating, Miss Rice of New 
 York, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Takano, 
Mr. Honda, Mr. Heck of Washington, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Danny K. Davis of 
 Illinois, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of 
 California, Ms. Norton, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Higgins, Mr. 
 Farr, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Welch, 
 Mr. Lewis, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. Ryan of 
Ohio, and Mr. Engel) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit wellness programs 
      from sharing personally identifiable information related to 
        individuals' use of or prescriptions for contraceptives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Birth Control Privacy Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING WELLNESS PROGRAMS FROM SHARING PERSONALLY 
              IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION RELATED TO INDIVIDUALS' USE OF 
              OR PRESCRIPTIONS FOR CONTRACEPTIVES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2705(j)(1) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C.300gg-4(j)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Privacy of individuals' use of or 
                prescriptions for contraceptives.--Such wellness 
                program shall violate this subsection if the plan or 
                issuer involved shares personally identifiable 
                information of an individual with an employer, either 
                directly or indirectly, related to the individual's use 
                of or prescriptions for contraceptives.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to plan years beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-20-1998
<CASH>                                           9,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,350
<PP&E>                                         640,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                 352,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 674,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           66,924
<PREFERRED>                                      9,487
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                   (189,844)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   674,707
<SALES>                                        958,592
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               958,592
<CGS>                                          714,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  939,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   544
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,283)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,551)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,551)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (30.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (30.13)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Sister Ann 
                          Keefe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SISTER ANN KEEFE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sister Ann Keefe Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sister Ann 
Keefe Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 820 Elmwood Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, as the ``Sister Ann 
                          Keefe Post Office''.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2478-2479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00450]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8150]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Ming Masterpieces From the Shanghai Museum''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Ming Masterpieces from the Shanghai 
Museum,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about 
March 3, 2013, until on or about June 2, 2013, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The

[[Page 2479]]

mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor 
(Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 7, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-00450 Filed 1-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Asset Mapping

Site Number/Name: PH43915 McCormick

Date of Site Visit: 3-10-2015

General Contractor: DSI

V1.1
Asset Mapping Information

V1.1

Sector Alpha Beta Gamma Delta

Antenna Count 3 3 3 N/A

Manufacturer

Model #

Azimuth 355 167 262

Top Antenna Height 180'4" 180'4" 180'4"

Bottom Antenna Height 177'1" 177'1" 177'1"

Ant. Separation Distance 173'8" 173'8" 173'8"

Coax Count 6 6 6

Coax Size AVA7-50A 1-5/8" AVA7-50A 1-5/8" AVA7-50A 1-5/8"

Sector Alpha Beta Gamma Delta

TMA Count 3 3 3

Manufacturer RFS RFS RFS

Model #

Mounting Location

Sector Alpha Beta Gamma Delta

RRH Count 1 1 1

Manufacturer NSN NSN NSN

Model # 084422A.101 084422A.101 084422A.101

Mounting Location IN 3G CABINET

RRHs

TMAs

Panel Antennas

CELLMAX

CMA-B/6521/EO-6/RET/TB05 

ATM1900D-1CWA/ATM2100D-1CWA

BEHIND ANTENNA ON PIPE

EACH SECTOR HAS 2-TWIN 1900 AND 1-TWIN 2100
Asset Mapping Information (Cont.)

V1.1

Antenna 1 Antenna 2 Antenna 3

Manufacturer N/A

Model #

Azimuth

RAD Center

Coax Count

Coax Size

Site Support Cabinet 3G Purcell Battery Backup Unit

# Rack Units Available 4 if blank cover removed ample amount batteries in SSC

Amps at Meter Main Breaker Size PPC Power Rating

Site Power (Amps) 200 200 200

MW & Misc.

BTS Information

Power Information
Tower Photos Tape Drop Photos (cont.)

Full Site View X Gamma Antennas RAD CenterX

Alpha Antennas X Delta Antennas RAD Center

Alpha TMAs/RRHs X MW/Misc. Tape Drop

Beta Antennas X MW/Misc. Tape Drop

Beta TMAs/RRHs X MW/Misc. Tape Drop

Gamma Antennas X MW/Misc. Tape Drop

Gamma TMAs/RRHs X Ground Photos

Delta Antennas Full View of BTS X

Delta TMAs/RRHs Inside SSC X

Existing MW/Miscellaneous SSC Available Rack Space X

Existing MW/Miscellaneous Inside 3G Purcell X

Existing MW/Miscellaneous 3G Purcell Av. Rack Space X

Tape Drop Photos Insite BBU

Alpha Antennas RAD Center X BBU Available Rack Space

Beta Antennas RAD Center X Meter X

Main Breaker Size X

Asset Mapping Photo Check List

V1.1
Tower Photos

Full Site View

V1.1
Tower Photos

Alpha Antennas

Alpha TMAs

V1.1
Tower Photos

Alpha TMA Alpha TMA
Tower Photos

Beta Antennas Beta TMAs

V1.1
Tower Photos

Beta TMA Beta TMA
Tower Photos

Gamma Antennas Gamma TMAs

V1.1
Tower Photos

Gamma TMA Gamma TMA

V1.1
Tape Drop Photos

Alpha Antennas RAD Center Beta Antennas RAD Center

V1.1
Tape Drop Photos

Gamma Antennas RAD Center

Delta Antennas RAD Center

(if applicable)

V1.1
Ground Photos

Full view of all BTS’s

V1.1
Ground Photos

Inside SSC SSC Available Rack Space

V1.1
Ground Photos

Inside 3G Purcell 3G Purcell Available Rack Space

V1.1
Ground Photos

Meter Main Breaker

V1.1
Ground Photos

PPC Rating

V1.1

PPC disconnect
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hector Camirlo ESPINOZA-GUIDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10878 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(October 31, 2017)

Peter J. Sholl, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Jennifer Lynn Peresie, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Howard C. Anderson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tampa, FL, Donna Lee Elm, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Dear Mr. Ross:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3606). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/26/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
EXHIBIT 10.5

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                      REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE REVOLVING LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (the
"Amendment") by and between Bateman Dynasty, LC ("Bateman") and Quest Group
International, Inc. ("Quest") is made and entered into to be effective as of the
1st day of February, 2002, by and between the undersigned parties.

                                    RECITALS

         A. Bateman and Quest entered into an agreement captioned "Revolving
Loan And Security Agreement" effective September 1, 2001 (the "Loan Agreement").
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as
set forth in the Loan Agreement.

         B. The parties desire to amend the Loan Agreement as described below.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby amend the Loan Agreement as
follows:

         1. Section 2.3 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

         2.3 In addition to the payments referenced in Section 2.1 and the
         repayment of the principal and interest owing on the Loans, Lender
         shall be entitled to payments of $5,000 per month beginning in
         September 2001. This monthly payment is only due when monthly Net Sales
         exceeds $100,000. The monthly payment shall be increased to $10,000 in
         any month in which Net Sales exceeds $200,000 and the monthly payment
         shall be increased to $20,000 in any month in which Net Sales exceeds
         $1,000,000. The payment is due on the last day of the month following
         the month in which the payment amount becomes known. Bateman and Quest
         will determine a payment schedule for any payments in arrears at such
         time as Quest's monthly sales reaches $100,000. The payment reference
         in this section 2.3 may be assigned by the Lender with or without the
         written authorization of the Borrower provided that the assignment
         complies in all respects with applicable laws and regulations,
         including, but not limited to, applicable securities laws.

         2. The Loan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall
remain unaltered, except to the extent specifically amended herein.

         3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of duplicate originals
or counterparts, each of which shall be of equal force and effect. The signature
in counterpart on a facsimile transmission copy of this contract shall be valid
and binding.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, have executed this Amendment No. 1
to the Loan Agreement to be effective as of the date first above written.

BATEMAN DYNASTY, LC                           QUEST GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.



By   /s/ Lynn Bateman                         By   /s/ Craig Davis
   -----------------------                       ------------------------------
Its:                                             Craig Davis, President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador TORRES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4213

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed June 5, 2017

(D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00060-TS-l) (D. Utah)

Elizabethanne Claire Stevens, Esq., Felice John Viti, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Salvador Torres-Garcia, Pro Se

Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, BALDOCK, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Timothy M. Tymkovich, Chief Judge

Salvador Torres-Garcia is serving a 151-month sentence after pleading guilty to possessing, with intent to distribute, over 500 grams of cocaine. After the Sentencing Commission promulgated Amendment 782 to the Guidelines, Mr. Torres-Garcia filed *614a motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court denied that motion in August 2015. In September 2016, more than a year after that denial, Mr. Torres-Garcia moved for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion to reconsider on October 13, 2016. Mr. Torres-Garcia then waited until December 7, 2016 to- file an “Application for Certificate of Appealability,” which this court construed as a notice of appeal filed on December 12. The government now asks us to dismiss the appeal as untimely. The law compels us to agree.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1) requires a criminal defendant to file a notice of appeal in the district court within 14 days of the entry of the judgment or order being appealed. Although that time bar is not jurisdictional, it “must be enforced by this court when properly invoked by the government.” *United States v. Mitchell,*518 F.3d 740, 744 (10th Cir. 2008). Here, the government has properly invoked the time bar in its response brief. *See United States v. Garduno,*506 F.3d 1287, 1292 *&*n.7 (10th Cir. 2007). Mr. Torres-Garcia did not submit his application for a certificate of appealability until over 50 days after the district court denied his motion to reconsider and over a year after the denial of his original § 3582 motion. Accordingly, that application cannot serve as a timely notice of appeal of either decision.

We DISMISS this appeal as untimely. We also DENY the motion to proceed in forma pauperis because we cannot discern a reasoned, non-frivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues Mr. Torres-Garcia raised in his briefs. We remind him of his obligation to pay the filing ■ fee in full.

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 706 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 706

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 2015

   Mr. Scott of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Massie) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent unjust and irrational 
                         criminal punishments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice Safety Valve Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE BELOW A STATUTORY MINIMUM.

    Section 3553 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Authority To Impose a Sentence Below a Statutory Minimum To 
Prevent an Unjust Sentence.--
            ``(1) General rule.--Notwithstanding any provision of law 
        other than this subsection, the court may impose a sentence 
        below a statutory minimum if the court finds that it is 
        necessary to do so in order to avoid violating the requirements 
        of subsection (a).
            ``(2) Court to give parties notice.--Before imposing a 
        sentence under paragraph (1), the court shall give the parties 
        reasonable notice of the court's intent to do so and an 
        opportunity to respond.
            ``(3) Statement in writing of factors.--The court shall 
        state, in the written statement of reasons, the factors under 
        subsection (a) that require imposition of a sentence below the 
        statutory minimum.
            ``(4) Appeal rights not limited.--This subsection does not 
        limit any right to appeal that would otherwise exist in its 
        absence.''.
                                 <all>
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 730

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that receipt of disability

compensation for dependents not depend upon the waiver of receipt

of an equal amount of retired or retirement pay.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

receipt of disability compensation for dependents not depend upon the waiver of receipt of an equal amount

of retired or retirement pay.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT AWARD OF DISABILITY COM4 PENSATION FOR DEPENDENTS AND RETIRED

5 PAY.

6 (a) CONCURRENT AWARD.—Section 5305 of title 38,

7 United States Code, is amended—
2

•S 730 IS

1 (1) by striking out ‘‘Any person’’ and inserting

2 in lieu thereof ‘‘(a) Except as provided in subsection

3 (b), any person’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section:

6 ‘‘(b) The requirement under subsection (a) of this

7 section that a person receiving compensation under the

8 laws administrated by the Secretary waive receipt of re9 tired or retirement pay in an amount equal to such com10 pensation shall not apply to receipt by the person of com11 pensation for dependents under section 1115 or 1135 of

12 this title.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact15 ment of this Act. No person shall be entitled to receive

16 by reason of the amendments made by subsection (a) any

17 benefits for any period before such date.

Æ