alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32001D1122(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D1122(01)

**Council Decision of 8 November 2001 appointing the full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions **

*
Official Journal C 327 , 22/11/2001 P. 0001 - 0003 *

Council Decision

of 8 November 2001

appointing the full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

(2001/C 327/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions(1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1947/93(2), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of nominees submitted by the Governments of the Member States for Government representatives and forwarded by the Commission for representatives of workers' and employers' organisations,

Whereas:

(1) By its Decision of 19 October 1998(3) the Council appointed the full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period from 19 October 1998 to 18 October 2001.

(2) The full members and alternates representing the Governments of the Member States and workers' and employers' organisations must be appointed for a three-year period.

(3) It is for the Commission to appoint its own representatives on the Administrative Board,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed full members and alternate members of the Administrative Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period from 19 October 2001 to 18 October 2004.

I. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

>TABLE>

II. REPRESENTATIVES OF WORKERS' ORGANISATIONS

>TABLE>

III. REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

>TABLE>

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members not yet nominated by Ireland at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Brussels on 8 November 2001.

For the Council

The President

E. Boutmans

(1) OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

(2) OJ L 181, 23.7.1993, p. 13.

(3) OJ C 336, 4.11.1998, p. 1.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, the
undersigned, David Scoglio, Chief Financial Officer, of Asure
Software, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.
            The
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      as amended, and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      DAVID SCOGLIODavid
      ScoglioChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      16, 2010


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Asure Software, Inc. and will be retained by Asure
Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.  The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of
the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
15447

#### MERRIMON v. McCAIN

(21 S. E. (2d), 404)

*87
      *Mr. A. S. Merrimon,*of Sumter, Counsel for Appellant,

*88
      *Mr. Wayne Law*Clifton, of Sumter, Counsel for Respondent,

July 22, 1942.

*Per Curiam:*

After a careful study and consideration of the record in 'this case, in the light of the issues made by the exceptions, we are of the opinion that the Circuit Court in its decree correctly decided the case. We adopt that decree as the judgment of this Court. Ret it be reported.'

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Bonham, Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne and Stukes, and Circuit Judge G. Dewey Oxner, Acting Associate Justice, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9570-9571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-21-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone 196--Fort Worth, Texas, Application for 
Subzone Expansion TTI, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by Alliance Corridor, Inc., grantee of FTZ 196, requesting 
expanded subzone status for the facilities of TTI, Inc., located in 
Fort Worth, Texas. The application was submitted pursuant to the 
provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-
81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was 
formally docketed on February 15, 2022.
    The proposed subzone site (3.6 acres) is located at 5050 Mark IV 
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas. No authorization for production activity 
has been requested at this time. The proposed expanded subzone would be 
subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 196. Because the 
proposed new site is located outside of FTZ 196's Alternative Site 
Framework (ASF) service area, authorization for the expanded subzone 
would not be under the ASF
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7412000e3400061510115a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0d1f112b1f190a0f0e450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is April 4, 2022. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to April 18, 2022.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.

[[Page 9571]]

    For further information, contact Camille Evans at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#783b19151114141d563d0e19160b380c0a191c1d561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296a48444045454c076c5f48475a695d5b484d4c074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 16, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-03676 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Peter Somers, Resp’t, *v.*The Metropolitan El. R. Co. *et al.,*App’lts.

Appeal by defendant from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions made at special term.

*Julien T. Davies*and *Alexander S. Lyman, for*app’lts; *Charles Gibson Bennett,*for resp’t.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Carlos CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41233 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Carlos Castro, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos Castro has *827moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*6th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *827published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 85-6348.

#### Sam *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6680 

To prohibit offices of the legislative branch from using Federal funds to 

acquire or display any flag or pennant other than the flag of the United 

States, the flag or pennant of any State or territory or possession 

of the United States, or the POW–MIA flag. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. MILLER of Ohio (for himself, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. WEBSTER

of Florida, and Mr. WALTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To prohibit offices of the legislative branch from using Federal funds to acquire or display any flag or pennant 

other than the flag of the United States, the flag or 

pennant of any State or territory or possession of the 

United States, or the POW–MIA flag. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITING FLAGS AND PENNANTS ACQUIRED 

4 OR DISPLAYED BY LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF5 FICES. 

6 (a) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in subsection 

7 (b), an office of the legislative branch may not use any 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6680 IH

1 funds appropriated or otherwise made available under 

2 Federal law during a fiscal year to acquire or display any 

3 flag or pennant other than the flag of the United States. 

4 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) does not apply to 

5 any of the following flags or pennants: 

6 (1) The flag or pennant of any State or terri7 tory or possession of the United States. 

8 (2) The flag or pennant of any department or 

9 agency of the Government. 

10 (3) The POW/MIA flag (as defined in section 

11 1082 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

12 Fiscal Year 1998). 

13 (4) The flag or pennant of any of the armed 

14 forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United 

15 States Code). 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall apply with re17 spect to fiscal year 2024 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

Æ 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01298**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 01298\01298_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01298\01298_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 01298\01298_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01298\01298_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01298\01298_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01298\01298_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01298\01298_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01298\Certification Statement_01298.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Ash handling.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Birchwood aerial boundary.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Site Location Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6898 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct an operational assessment 

of the installation defense capabilities of the Department of Defense 

to defeat unmanned aircraft system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct an operational 

assessment of the installation defense capabilities of the 

Department of Defense to defeat unmanned aircraft system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6898 IH

1 SECTION 1. OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND REPORT ON 

2 INSTALLATION DEFENSE CAPABILITIES 

3 USING DIRECTED ENERGY TO DEFEAT UN4 MANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM AND UAS 

5 SWARMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

8 shall conduct an operational assessment of the installation 

9 defense capabilities of the Department of Defense to de10 feat unmanned aircraft system (in this section referred to 

11 as ‘‘UAS’’) threats. 

12 (b) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required under 

13 subsection (a) shall include, for the capabilities covered by 

14 the assessment, an assessment of each of the following: 

15 (1) The operation of high energy lasers, high 

16 power microwaves and other emerging directed en17 ergy technologies. 

18 (2) The ability to defeat UAS threats at oper19 ationally relevant distances. 

20 (3) The ability to integrate with other counter21 UAS systems and existing security infrastructure. 

22 (4) The ability to rapidly transport and set-up. 

23 (5) The ability to regulate defeat distances. 

24 (6) The ability to safely operate on United 

25 States installations. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6898 IH

1 (7) The effects on the spectrum and airspace 

2 inside and outside of established defeat distances. 

3 (8) The effects on human beings and vehicles 

4 inside and outside of established defeat distances. 

5 (9) The ease of training and operation. 

6 (10) The maintainability and sustainability. 

7 (11) The cost-effectiveness. 

8 (12) The scalability. 

9 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the com10 pletion of the assessment required by subsection (a), the 

11 Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional de12 fense committees a report that includes— 

13 (1) the results of the assessment; and 

14 (2) the recommendations of the Secretary for 

15 any changes or modifications to equipment, proce16 dures, regulations or existing laws to operationally 

17 employ directed energy systems for installation de18 fense against UAS and UAS swarms. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
% Data Neo (m)


% Human data sets
% note AE is now total amount, summed of form AE from Simusolv model
% Nolan 1984 
% (T,CBLP,AE,BLBES)
NOLANO=[
1.0	0.087	NaN	NaN;
2.0	1.785	NaN	72.;
4.0	3.91	NaN	NaN;
6.0	4.685	6.371	33.;
8.0	4.455	NaN	NaN;
10	 4.229	NaN	NaN;
12.0	4.043	19.301	19.;
24.0	1.365	35.571	15.;	
36.0	NaN  	47.481	NaN;	
48.0	1.808	56.971	23.;	
60.0	NaN	64.47	NaN;	
72.0	0.909	69.351	27.;	
96.0	0.54	76.621	34.;	
120.0	NaN	80.511	NaN;
192.0	NaN	NaN	46.;	
336.0	NaN	NaN	73.;	
528.0	NaN	NaN	75.;	
648.0	NaN	NaN  92.;	
720.0	NaN	NaN	85.];

% Kisicki human study, 500, 1000, 2000 ug/kg
% Fa set to 0.37 based on AUC of Brzak TCP blood data compared to Nolan, different forumations
% (T,cblp,elast)
KISICKI500 =[
2.0	0.361	NaN;
4.0	0.762	NaN;
6.0	0.856	NaN;
8.0	0.878	NaN;
12.0	0.786	3.21;
24.0	0.770	6.07;
36.0	NaN	9.67;
48.0	0.716	12.37;
60.0	NaN	13.78;
72.0	0.464	15.78;
84.0	NaN	17.34;
96.0	0.304	18.41;
108.0	NaN	19.49;
120.0	NaN	20.2;
132.0	NaN	20.71;
144.0	0.160	21.16;
156.0	NaN	21.46;
168.0	0.131	21.73];

KISICKI1000 =[
0	0	NaN;
2	0.728	NaN;
4	1.483	NaN;
6	1.679	NaN;
8	1.545	NaN;
12	1.511	6.19;
24	1.385	12.02;
36	NaN	18.74;
48	1.279	24.15;
60	NaN	28.36;
72	0.806	32.42;
84	NaN	35.01;
96	0.514	36.34;
108	NaN	37.65;
120	0.316	38.41;
132	NaN	39.34;
144	0.223	40.11;
156	NaN	40.54;
168	0.132	41.03];

KISICKI2000 =[
2	1.295	NaN	99.53;
4	1.806	NaN	102.4;
6	3.123	NaN	NaN;
8	2.822	NaN	98.39;
12	2.966	10.31	94.31;
24	2.963	21.36	99.71;
36	NaN	32.41	100.38;
48	2.837	45.38	97.36;
60	NaN	56.06	NaN;
72	1.742	65.31	NaN;
84	NaN	72.2	NaN;
96	1.157	77.69	NaN;
108	NaN	81.95	NaN;
120	0.674	84.99	NaN;
132	NaN	87.52	NaN;
144	0.451	89.31	NaN;
156	NaN	90.83	NaN;
168	0.383	92.11	NaN];
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SCB Computer Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T.
Scott Cobb, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



March 12, 2003



By:  /s/ T. Scott Cobb
     -----------------------

        T. Scott Cobb
        President and
     Chief Executive Officer
#### Henry Whitin, Respondent, *v.*Charles H. Pendegast et al., Appellants.

(Argued November 16, 1872;

decided November 19, 1872.)

Plaintiff delivered to defendants, common carriers at Charleston, fifty bales of cotton to be transported to New York in their steamer Star of the South. The bill of lading acknowledged “ receipt on board,” and the referee so found. In fact, it was on land, and a portion was sent by another •ship. Plaintiff received from this ship thirteen bales. The Star of the South was disabled on the voyage; was taken to Baltimore and there discharged her cargo. Plaintiff authorized one Cole to demand and receive from defendants at Baltimore thirty-seven bales. He made the demand and paid the freight but received only twenty-two bales, that being all the purser could identify as belonging to plaintiff. A number of bales, not identified, were taken possession of by *675agents of parties claiming cotton by this ship and were forwarded to New York, and of this plaintiff received, twelve bales, leaving him three bales short, for which he brought suit and obtained judgment. *Held,*that variance between the finding of the referee, that the cotton was *“*on board,” and the fact, was immaterial. ‘The gravamen of the action was the non-delivery of the. three bales in New York in pursuance of the contract. That plaintiff could accept delivery at an intermediate port and such acceptance would terminate' the voyage and defendants’ liability, but that no such delivery and acceptance appeared in this case. 1st. There was no finding and no fact to authorize it that the cargo of the Star of the South included the thirty-seven bales. 2d. Plaintiff was not bound by any act of Cole in accepting, in common with other claimants, cotton not identified as a delivery, as his authority was simply to demand and receive the thirty-seven bales.

*John N. Whiting*for the appellants.

*Walter Edwards, Jr.,*for thé respondent.

Andrews, J.,

reads opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,220
<SECURITIES>                                    11,889
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,078
<PP&E>                                          18,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,631
<BONDS>                                          1,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,539
<SALES>                                         26,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,088
<CGS>                                            8,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (372)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     21
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,550)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A145