alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

 2:00 p.m., Thursday, March 10, 2022.

# PLACE: 

Via Conference Call.

# STATUS: 

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Audit Committee Meeting.

The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

    - Executive Session

## Agenda

I. Call to Order

II. FY21 External Audit—BDO

III. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session

IV. Executive Session with External Auditors—BDO

V. Executive Session with Chief Audit Executive

VI. Action Item Approval of FY21 External Audit

VII. Action Item HPN Launchpad Acquisition Audit Report

VIII. Internal Audit Status Reports

a. Internal Audit Reports Awaiting Management's Response

○ Finance—Accounts Payable/ACH Transactions (NetSuite) FY21

b. ITS Road Map IAM Dependency

c. Internal Audit Performance Scorecard

d. Implementation of Internal Audit Recommendations

IX. Adjournment

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                         Lakeyia Thompson, Special Assistant, (202) 524-9940;                         *Lthompson@nw.org.*

Lakeyia Thompson,

Special Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2022-04604 Filed 3-1-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTIONS 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wireless Xcessories Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I Ronald E.
Badke, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   By /s/ Ronald E. Badke
                                                      ------------------
                                                      Ronald E. Badke
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      May 3, 2005
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dana Resources (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|                        | /s/ Len De Melt                                                   
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 8, 2009 | Len De Melt                                                       
|                        | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial Officer,
|                        | Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary,
      Treasurer, Director

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6701 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6701

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for 
          inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2023

  Mr. Lawler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and adjust for 
          inflation the above-the-line deduction for teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(a)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$600''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 62(d)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2023'',
            (2) by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$600'', and
            (3) by striking ``calendar year 2014'' and inserting 
        ``calendar year 2022''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Salvador Antonio Damian LOPEZ, also known as Salvador Cruz Guillen, also known as Salvador Antoni Damian Lopez, also known as Don Chava, also known as Pappy, also known as Apa, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51138 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 9, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Salvador Antonio Damian Lopez, Pro Se

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Salvador Antonio Damian Lopez appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion seeking a reduction of his 240-month sentence for conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine and more than 500 grams of methamphetamine. He renews his assertion that he was entitled to a two-level reduction under retroactive Amendment 782, asserts that the district court failed to provide written reasons for the denial, and complains that his sentence should be lowered because of his ill health and cooperation with the investigation.

This court reviews the district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion, its interpretation of the sentencing guidelines de novo, and its findings of fact for clear error. *United States v. Benitez,*822 F.3d 807, 810-11 (5th Cir. 2016). “[A] defendant is not eligible for a reduction under § 3582(c)(2) if a qualifying amendment ‘does not have the effect of lowering the defendant’s applicable guideline range.’” *Id.*at 810 (quoting U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B)).

The 45.36 kilograms of methamphetamine (actual), 36.01 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine or “Ice,” and 35 kilograms of cocaine for which the district court held Damian Lopez accountable trigger the highest base offense level of 38 under the drug quantity table as revised by Amendment 782. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1). Because Damian Lopez’s base offense level of 38 remains unchanged, Amendment 782 does not have the effect of lowering his advisory guideline range. *See Benitez,*822 F.3d at 810. The district court thus did not abuse its discretion in concluding that he was not eligible for any sentence modification. *See id.*at 810-11; *see also United States v. Hernandez,*645 F.3d 709, 712 (5th Cir. 2011).

Section 3582(c)(2) does not authorize the district court to reduce Damian Lopez’s sentence under § 3582(c)(2) based on his assistance or a request for leniency. *See*§ 3582(c)(2); *Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 825-27, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 *276L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). Contrary to Damian Lopez’s assertion, the district court issued a written reason for the denial of his motion.

The district court’s judgment denying Damian Lopez’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction is AFFIRMED. Damian Lopez’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### calif.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 03/24/11

Worksheet Description

Sheet1 reports baseline impingement and entrainment

mortality losses at baseline and under regulatory options 1 through 3. Purpose: This is an output file for the california region including baseline impingement and entrainment mortality losses at baseline and under regulatory options 1 through 3.

File Info 1 of 2Species Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3

1 All forage species 0.201212 0.175999 0.198139 0.199981 17.35468 0 14.79113 15.47294 17.55589 0.175999 14.98927 15.67292 2 All harvested species 0.592765 0.518487 0.583711 0.589137 18.68535 0 15.92525 16.65933 19.27812 0.518487 16.50896 17.24847 3 American shad 0 0 0 0 2.17E-07 0 1.85E-07 1.94E-07 2.17E-07 0 1.85E-07 1.94E-07 4 Cabezon 9.88E-05 8.65E-05 9.73E-05 9.82E-05 0.059004 0 0.050288 0.052606 0.059103 8.65E-05 0.050386 0.052705 5 California halibut 0.000491 0.000429 0.000483 0.000488 0.232392 0 0.198064 0.207194 0.232883 0.000429 0.198548 0.207682 6 California scorpionfish 0.000251 0.000219 0.000247 0.000249 0 0 0 0 0.000251 0.000219 0.000247 0.000249 7 Crabs (other) 0.024148 0.021122 0.023779 0.024 7.797866 0 6.646004 6.952356 7.822014 0.021122 6.669783 6.976356 8 Sea Basses0.001795 0.00157 0.001768 0.001784 2.830883 0 2.412719 2.523935 2.832678 0.00157 2.414486 2.525719 9 Shrimp (other) 0.007815 0.006835 0.007695 0.007767 0.625946 0 0.533484 0.558075 0.63376 0.006835 0.541179 0.565842 10 Drums and croakers 0.045703 0.039976 0.045005 0.045423 0.227833 0 0.194179 0.20313 0.273536 0.039976 0.239184 0.248553 11 Dungeness crab 0.000954 0.000834 0.000939 0.000948 0.008489 0 0.007235 0.007569 0.009443 0.000834 0.008175 0.008517 12 Flounders 0.01066 0.009324 0.010497 0.010594 0.096052 0 0.081864 0.085637 0.106712 0.009324 0.092361 0.096232 13 Fish (other) 0.004224 0.003695 0.00416 0.004198 0.007752 0 0.006607 0.006911 0.011976 0.003695 0.010766 0.01111 16 Northern anchovy 0.344701 0.301508 0.339437 0.342592 0.031608 0 0.026939 0.028181 0.37631 0.301508 0.366376 0.370773 19 Rockfishes 0.016174 0.014147 0.015927 0.016075 6.3284 0 5.3936 5.642221 6.344574 0.014147 5.409527 5.658297 20 Salmon 2.39E-07 2.09E-07 2.36E-07 2.38E-07 0 0 0 0 2.39E-07 2.09E-07 2.36E-07 2.38E-07 21 Sculpins 0.014786 0.012934 0.014561 0.014696 0.425481 0 0.362631 0.379347 0.440267 0.012934 0.377192 0.394043 22 Smelts 0.005941 0.005196 0.00585 0.005904 0.000539 0 0.00046 0.000481 0.00648 0.005196 0.00631 0.006385 23 Striped bass 0 0 0 0 0.012059 0 0.010278 0.010752 0.012059 0 0.010278 0.010752 24 Sunfish 0.000104 9.13E-05 0.000103 0.000104 0.001049 0 0.000894 0.000936 0.001154 9.13E-05 0.000997 0.001039 25 Surfperches0.114918 0.100518 0.113163 0.114215 0 0 0 0 0.114918 0.100518 0.113163 0.114215 26 Total (all species) 0.793977 0.694486 0.78185 0.789118 36.04003 0 30.71638 32.13227 36.83401 0.694486 31.49823 32.92139

Sheet1 2 of 2
#### Agatha (Named Herein as Mrs. Reginald) Reichman, Appellant, *v.*Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, Respondent.

Submitted May 24, 1943;

decided June 10, 1943.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 290 N. Y. 344.)
#### Hutchinson v. Hutchinson et al.

Appeal: less than $100: no certificate: dismissed.

*Appeal from Bremer District Court*— Hon. J. B. Cleland, Judge.

Tuesday, October 25, 1887.

The plaintiff brought this action claiming a landlord’s lien against certain chattel property belonging to the defendants. The defendants made delault, and the lien was established. William Britt intervened in the action, and claimed that he had a chattel mortgage upon the property. Issue was taken by the plaintiff by answering the petition of intervention, and the cause was continued to the next term of the court as to the controversy be*764tween the plaintiff and the intervenor. At the next term the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the petition of intervention because it was not tried at the previous term. The motion was overruled and a trial was had, and it was found that the claim of the intervenor was superior to the claim of the plaintiff. Plaintiff appeals.

*A. F. Brown,*for appellant.

*E. L. Smalley,*for appellees.

Rothrock, J.

The amount claimed by plaintiff in his petition is $87.50. Counsel for intervenor makes the question that the appeal cannot be entertained because the amount in controversy does not exceed $100, and no question of law is certified to this court by the trial judge as required by law. The point appears to be well taken, and the appeal must be

Dismissed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 606 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain compensation 

received by public safety officers and their dependents from gross income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2015 

Mr. PAULSEN (for himself, Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. 

PASCRELL, and Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

certain compensation received by public safety officers 

and their dependents from gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Don’t Tax Our Fallen 

5 Public Safety Heroes Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 606 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RE2 CEIVED BY PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS AND 

3 THEIR DEPENDENTS. 

4 Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal Revenue 

5 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end 

6 of paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end of para7 graph (5) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by inserting after 

8 paragraph (5) the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(6) amounts received pursuant to— 

10 ‘‘(A) section 1201 of the Omnibus Crime 

11 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 

12 U.S.C. 3796); or 

13 ‘‘(B) a program established under the laws 

14 of any State which provides monetary com15 pensation for surviving dependents of a public 

16 safety officer who has died as the direct and 

17 proximate result of a personal injury sustained 

18 in the line of duty, 

19 except that subparagraph (B) shall not apply to any 

20 amounts that would have been payable if death of 

21 the public safety officer had occurred other than as 

22 the direct and proximate result of a personal injury 

23 sustained in the line of duty.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
| Entity                                                       |   | Jurisdiction |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Cornerstone      Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P. |   | Delaware     |
| CGI      Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P.              |   | Delaware     |
| CGI      Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P.              |   | Delaware     |
| CGI      Retail Operating Partnership, L.P.                  |   | Delaware     |
| Master      HC TRS, LLC                                      |   | Delaware     |
| Caruth      Haven TRS, LLC                                   |   | Delaware     |
| Caruth      Haven GP, LLC                                    |   | Delaware     |
| Caruth      Haven, L.P.                                      |   | Delaware     |
| The      Oaks Bradenton TRS, LLC                             |   | Delaware     |
| The      Oaks Bradenton, LLC                                 |   | Delaware     |
| GreenTree      Acquisition TRS, LLC                          |   | Delaware     |
| GreenTree      Acquisition, LLC                              |   | Delaware     |
| MVI      Health Center GP, LLC                               |   | Delaware     |
| MVI Health Center,      L.P.                       |   | Delaware     |

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 21, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00456

- CR

Dwayne Edward Nash, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBE RTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment

of the district court is in all things affirmed; that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal;

and that this decision be certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of drugstore.com, inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 29,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert A. Barton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

/s/    ROBERT A. BARTON 

 

Robert A. Barton 

*Chief Financial Officer*

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to drugstore.com, inc. and will be retained by drugstore.com, inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

April 28, 2003
#### ADAMS SHEET METAL CORPORATION *v.*CITY OF ROYAL OAK. CITY OF ROYAL OAK *v.*CLAIR DITCHY ASSOCIATES.

Appeal and Error — Trial Court Findings.

Findings of trial judge in third-party aetion for damages for negligence in maintenance of air conditioner *held,*not clearly erroneous on record presented (GCR 1963, 517.1).

Reference for Points in Headnote

5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 839 *et seq.*

Appeal from Oakland; Adams (Clark J.), J.

Submitted Division 2 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.

(Docket No. 3,946.)

Decided June 10,1968.

Complaint by Adams Sheet Metal Corporation, a Michigan corporation, against the City of Royal Oak, a municipal corporation, for costs of material and labor in replacement of air conditioner coils. Third-party complaint by City of Royal Oak against *658Clair Ditchy Associates, a partnership, for negligence in causing damage which necessitated repair. Judgment for principal plaintiff. Judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant. Third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak appeals from judgment in favor of third-party defendant.

Affirmed.

*Allan G. Eertler,*for third-party plaintiff City of Royal Oak.

*Malcolm Eeber,*for third-party defendant Clair Ditchy Associates.

Per Curiam.

Third-party plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action in favor of third-party defendant entered by the trial court sitting without a jury on the basis that the alleged negligence of defendant had not been established.

A review of the trial record fails to establish that the findings of the trial judge which support his judgment are clearly erroneous. OCR 1963, 517.1.

Affirmed, with costs to third-party defendant.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. G-illis, JJ., concurred.