alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0001005335
<NAME>               SMITH BARNEY PRINCIPAL PLUS FUTURES FUND L.P. II
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     7,330,819
<SECURITIES>                                              16,928,699
<RECEIVABLES>                                                188,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          24,448,069
<PP&E>                                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            24,448,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        614,606
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                23,833,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              24,448,069
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           4,268,629
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             497,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            3,771,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               3,771,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    221.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting, etc., of Estate of Peter Werry. Deceased.

*C. E. Bushmore,*for app’It; *Wm. Vanamee,*for resp’ts.

Order affirmed, with costs to both parties payable out of the estate. All concur.

Affirming 35 N. Y. State Rep., 365.
#### Ezekiel DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amber MARTIN; Johnny Blevins; FNU Weeks; Jane Doe; FNU Tyler; FNU James; FNU Myers; FNU San-Nicholas; FNU Hulderman; FNU Clark; FNU Dawson; Hector Rios, Jr.; Correct Care Solutions, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6060

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed May 1, 2017

(D.C. No. 5:16-CV-01375-HE) (W.D. Oklahoma)

Ezekiel Davis, Pro Se

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.
[L. A. No. 2955.

Department One.

December 23, 1912.]

#### A. M. VICKREY et al., Appellants, v. SIMON MAIER and JOHN T. JONES, Respondents.

Judgment reversed on the authority of *Vickrey*v. *Maier, ante,*p. 384.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Alton M. Cates, and Stewart & Stewart, for Appellants.

James P. Clark, and Mott & Dillon, for Respondents.

SHAW, J.

The facts in this case are in all essential particulars the same in effect as in the second contract considered in the case of *Vickrey*v. *Maier, ante,*p. 384, [129 Pac. 273], this day decided. » The parties to this appeal have stipulated that the decision of the appeal in that case shall control the decision here. Upon the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it is obvious that the judgment of the court below in this case for the defendants was erroneous.

The judgment is reversed.

Angellotti, J., and Sloss, J., concurred.
#### Perry *v.*Harper *et al.*

No. 13311.

May 14, 1940.

*H. A. Wilkinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Joe M. Bay, E. L. Smith, Olin Hammock,*and *M. Davis,*contra.

Duckworth, Justice.

1. This is a companion case to *Harper*v. *Perry,*ante, where it was held: “Where a motion for new trial is pending in the superior court, there is no provision of law authorizing the movant to file a second separate original motion for new trial complaining of the same verdict.”

2. Inasmuch as the second motion was not authorized by law, the judgment refusing to sustain that motion will not be reversed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 18, 2015

jam

Order 

Clerk

March 18, 2015

151078

KEVIN SCOTT VARNER, 

Plaintiff,

v SC: 151078

AGC: 1883-14

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff having failed to acknowledge 

responsibility for the filing fee as required by the order of February 24, 2015, the Clerk of 

the Court is hereby directed to close this file.
D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY ( 3 12 ) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

June 6, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Depart ment of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Applications of United /United Express and Qatar

Docket s DOT

- OST

- 20 07

- 28628 and

– OST

- 2007

- 29161

Dear Mr. Gretch:

I n the above dockets, 1 the Department granted Statements of A uthorization

authorizing code

- share services by Continental/United /United Express 2 and

Qatar

. Consistent with Department requirements

, Continental/United /United

Express notify the Department that they will terminate all code

- share services

with Qatar , eff

ective September 15 , 2012.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International and

Regulatory Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

cc: Robert Finamore

Esta Rosenberg

Anita Mosner

1 By Order 2011

- 3

- 1 4, the Department reissued authorities originally granted to United in the name of

“ Continental, Continental Micronesia and Air Micronesia and/or United ”

. 2 United is filing this notice on behalf of United Express carriers that hold a statement of authoriz ation to

code share with Qatar ( GoJet , SkyWest, Mesa and Shuttle America ), all of which were granted in Docket

DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 29161

.C ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (UPS)

carl.nelson@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com ( World Airways)

rpommer@atlasair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña

International Regulatory A dvisor

June 6, 2012
# L_2010273EN.01001801.xml

| 19.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 273/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 273/18

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2001/548/EC of 9 July 2001 on the setting-up of a committee in the area of supplementary pensions

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 196 of 20 July 2001
  )

On page 27, Article 5, in the first paragraph:

for:

‘three years’,

read:

‘two years’;

in the third paragraph:

for:

‘three-year period’,

read:

‘two-year period’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12715-12716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative: Novel Tools to Probe Cells and 
Circuits in the Brain (R01).
    Date: March 30, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Erin E. Gray, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard NSC 
6152B, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8152, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfdacdd6d191d8cddec6ffd1d6d791d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8feafde6e1a1e8fdeef6cfe1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 12716]]


    Dated: March 1, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04678 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Wilson v. Russell et al.

1. Tax Sale and Deed: imperfect notice to redeem: service on wrong party: limitation of action to redeem. In an action to redeem eighty acres of land from a tax sale and deed, it appeared that the notice of expiration of time of redemption, which was served by publication, described only two and one-half acres of the land, and that it was addressed to James T. Wilson, while the name of the plaintiff, who was in possession at the time, was J. D. Wilson. *Held*that a deed made upon such notice did not cut off plaintiff’s right to redeem, and did not cause the statute of limitations to run against him. (Compare *Hillyer v. Farneman,*65 Iowa, 227, and *Slyjield v. JBarmtm,*71 Id., 245.)'

2. Appeal: practice: abstract: wrong name of trial judge. The fact that appellant’s abstract incorrectly designates the judge who certified to the evidence can have no effect upon the determination of the case.

*Appeal from Ringgold Circuit Court.*

Tuesday, December 13.

Action to quiet the title to land. There was a decree for defendants, upon a demurrer to their answer being overruled. Plaintiff appeals.

*J. W.*Brocket, for appellant.

*Laughlin c&*Campbell, for appellees.

Beck, J.

i. tax sale perrect notice tó redeem: service on wrong party: limitation of deem. I. The petition alleges that plaintiff is the owner of the patent title of the land in controversy, — eighty acres; that defendants claim title under a quitclaim deed from one to whom the land was con- . . ,. veyed by the county treasurer under a tax sale; *....*’ that the land was taxed to plaintiff at the time the notice of the expiration of redemption was given; that such notice described only two and one-half acres of the land, and was addressed to James T. Wilson, and that the notice was not in fact served as shown in the proof of service thereof.. The answer of defendant admits *396these facts, but, in avoidance thereof, pleads the statute limiting actions to recover land conveyed by tax deeds. A demurrer to this answer was overruled.

II. The demurrer should have been sustained. As to all the land, except two and one-half acres, there was no notice at all. As to that much of it, the notice was not directed to the persons to whom the land was taxed. The statute of limitations, under the decisions of this court, does not cut off the right of redemption of plaintiff, the owner of patent title. *(Hillyer v. Farneman,*65 Iowa, 227; *Slyfield v. Barnum,*71 Id., 245.)

2. appeal: SCct?ewrong name of trial judge. An amended abstract filed by defendants shows that the plaintiff’s abstract incorrectly designates the judge making the certificate of the evidence. This matter can have no effect in the determination of the case, as it is *„*. . , _ ox no importance. IJie abstract would be good without giving the name of the judge who certified to the evidence.

The decree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for a decree in harmony with this opinion.

Reversed.
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

12/21/2010 08:09:36

Query Parameters:
12/21/2010 08:09:36

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 129 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 1 

ABX ABX AIR 1 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 2 

AFR AIR FRANCE 10 

AIC AIR INDIA 6 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 5 

AMX AEROMEXICO 7 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

ARA ARIK AIR 1 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 4 

AZA ALITALIA 5 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 19 

BER AIR BERLIN 2 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 6 

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 6 

CAO AIR CHINA CARGO 2 

CAY CAYMAN AIRWAYS 2 

CCA AIR CHINA 2 

CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 3 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 20 

CMP COPA AIRLINES 1 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 119 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 6 

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 8 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 202 

DHL DHL 1 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 8 

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 62 

EIN AER LINGUS 6 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 4 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

FDX FED EX 4 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 13 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 4 

ICE ICELANDAIR 4 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 2 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 348 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LAN LAN CHILE 6 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 2 

LOT LOT - POLISH AIRLINES 4 

MES MESABA AVIATION 6 

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

Page 2
12/21/2010 08:09:36

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 7 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 2 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RJA ROYAL JORDANIAN 2 

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 3 

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 4 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 25 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 7 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 6 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 19 

Page 3
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2c

                        AMENDMENT TO STANDSTILL AGREEMENT

        This Amendment to Standstill Agreement (the "Amendment") is entered into
by and between Paul Chopra, an individual ("Chopra"), on the one hand, and COHR
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("COHR"), on the other hand. (Chopra and COHR are
collectively referred to as "the Parties".) The Effective Date of this Amendment
is January 31, 1999.

                                    Recitals

        A.     The Parties entered into a Standstill Agreement dated April 3, 
1998.

        B.     The Ending Date of that Standstill Agreement initially was 
November 10, 1998, and was extended by previous Amendment to January 31, 1999.

        C.     The Parties have agreed that the Standstill Agreement Effective
Period should be extended to a new Ending Date pursuant to the terms set forth
herein.

                                    Agreement

        1.     Ending Date

        The "Ending Date" of the Standstill Agreement shall be amended to be the
earliest of the following:
        (a) Fourteen (14) days following the date on which either party gives
        written notice to the other party that it is terminating this Agreement;
        or (b) February 28, 1999.
All rights and obligations existing prior to this Amendment (except as revised
herein or by separate written agreement) or arising under this Amendment shall
survive the termination of this Agreement.

        2.     Certain Continuing Benefits

        (a) The Standstill Agreement paragraph 4(b) is amended to provide for a
        salary of $5,000 per month from the Effective Date of this Amendment
        onward. (b) All other terms and conditions of the Standstill Agreement
        continue in effect.

        3.     Integration

        The Standstill Agreement and this Amendment thereto contain the entire
agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
supersede all prior agreements, understandings, commitments and practices,
whether written or oral, except that the Standstill Agreement and this Amendment
thereto are an amendment of that certain Employment Agreement dated January 1,
1996. No amendments to the Standstill Agreement and this Amendment thereto may

<PAGE>   2

be made except by a writing signed by both parties.

        This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be an
original agreement. The undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.

Chopra                                     COHR Inc.


/S/ PAUL CHOPRA                            By     /S/ LYNN P. REITNOUER       
--------------------------                        ------------------------------
Paul Chopra                                       Lynn P. Reitnouer
                                                  Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1,000





<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                                      19,917
<SECURITIES>                                                                20,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                                               17,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                            61,118
<PP&E>                                                                      10,476
<DEPRECIATION>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                              92,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                       13,630
<BONDS>                                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                  76,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                                92,029
<SALES>                                                                     17,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                            17,848
<CGS>                                                                        4,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                4,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                            14,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            (519)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                             (1,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  (424)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         (1,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 362
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                  (647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                (0.06)



</TABLE>
NO. 07-02-0156-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	FEBRUARY 25, 2003

	______________________________

	ERIC DARNELL BOULDWIN, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;

	NO. 873010; HONORABLE BELINDA HILL, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.* 

	On April 19, 2001, upon his plea of guilty, appellant Eric Darnell Bouldwin was adjudged guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance weighing more than four grams but less than 200 grams.  In accordance with a plea bargain, he was placed on probation (community supervision) for a period of three years.  On February 19, 2002, after hearing, appellant’s probation was revoked and he was ordered to serve a three year sentence in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice and in addition was ordered to pay a fine of $500. Appellant gave timely notice of appeal from the conviction.

	On January 31, 2003, we received appellant’s motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and to dismiss the appeal.  His attorney joined in the motion.  Because appellant’s motion meets all the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), and because this court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving appellant’s motion, the motion must be, and is hereby, granted.

	Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motions for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							John T. Boyd

							Senior Justice

Do not publish.