alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         278,915                 110,730
<SECURITIES>                                   137,389                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,074                   3,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (696)                   (348)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,673                   5,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               427,920                 102,960
<PP&E>                                         354,887                 326,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                (59,419)                (30,195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 888,977                 554,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          207,956                  72,553
<BONDS>                                        500,000                 265,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,021               (216,927)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   888,977                 936,780
<SALES>                                        555,324                 641,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               555,324                 641,415
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,347                 506,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,118                  50,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,559                  87,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (39,423)               (419,457)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,136               (331,879)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**U.S. Bank Trust National Association**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the “Trustee”), as Trustee in respect of the CorTS Trust VI For IBM Debentures (the “Trust”), does hereby certify that: 

1.        The Bank is Trustee under the Trust Agreement. 

2.        The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Trust Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust. 

3.        This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB. 

4.        A review of the Trustee’s activities during the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2010 and of its performance under the Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

5.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Trust Agreement in all material respects throughout such twelve-month period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 14th day of March 2011. 

 

 

 

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6773 

To designate the Senator Dianne Feinstein Memorial Trail in Headwaters 

Forest Reserve, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself and Mr. HUFFMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the Senator Dianne Feinstein Memorial Trail 

in Headwaters Forest Reserve, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Fein5 stein Memorial Trail Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN MEMORIAL TRAIL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Elk River Trail in Head8 waters Forest Reserve, California, shall hereafter be 

9 known and designated as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein 

10 Memorial Trail’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6773 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Elk River Trail in Headwaters Forest Re4 serve shall be deemed to be a reference to the Senator 

5 Dianne Feinstein Memorial Trail. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31

      Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

Re:   Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2006-HE7 (the "Trust")

I, Steven Shapiro, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Countrywide Home Servicing
LP, NC Capital Corporation, WMC Mortgage Corporation,  Decision One Mortgage
Company, L.L.C., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Wells Fargo, National
Association, and LaSalle Bank National Association.

Date: March 30, 2007


/s/ Steven Shapiro
By: Steven Shapiro
Title: Vice President
#### NEVINS vs. McKEE,

Appeal from Grayson county.

*Practice.*— An attempt, by petition filed after adjournment of the trial term of the court, to obtain a new trial of the cause, is a relief which a court of chancery has power to grant, but will not do except upon facts which show the clearest and strongest reason for interposition.

*Same.*— To make such showing, it is not sufficient that it appears that injustice has been done, or that the party had a good defense, *54which lie was prevented from making. It must further be shown that he has not resorted to chancery, because of any inattention or negligence on his part ; a clear case of diligence as well as merit; a good defense which he was prevented from making by fraud, accident or the acts of the opposing party, wholly unmixed with any fault or negligence on his own part.

*Same.*— That the attorney for the party seeking such relief misunderstood the scope and extent of his employment, is not a sufficient showing.

Affirmed.

'Willie, chief justice.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.115    
  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO THE
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
  


        This Amendment Agreement, made as of the 28th day of November, 2001 is between ATC Healthcare, Inc (formerly Staff Builders, Inc.) (the
"Company") and Stephen Savitsky (the "Employee"). 


        WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1987, amended by Agreement dated October 31, 1991 and further amended by
Agreement dated December 7, 1992 (the "Agreement"); and further amended by Agreement dated October 20, 1999; and 


        WHEREAS,
the parties now desire to further amend the Agreement as provided herein; 


        NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


	1.
	Section 3(a)
of the Agreement, relating to compensation, is hereby amended such that the Employee's base salary will be $201,625.



	2.
	Section 4,
relating to duties is hereby amended such that the Employee will serve as Chairman of the Board and will provide advice and guidance to the Company on key issues. 



        Except
as expressly amended herein, all other terms, conditions, agreements, representations and warranties contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written: 



	 	 	ATC HEALTHCARE, INC.
	

 	
 	

By	

/s/  DAVID SAVITSKY      
 Name: David Savitsky

Title: President
	

 	
 	
EMPLOYEE
	

 	
 	

 	

/s/  STEPHEN SAVITSKY      
 Stephen Savitsky











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.115


AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth W. Bell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pacific WebWorks,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


                               /s/ Kenneth W. Bell
Date: March 29, 2005           ____________________________________
                               Kenneth W. Bell
                               Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony SWABY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-17780 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(August 29, 2017)

Jodi Leigh Anton, Wifredo A. Ferrer, Emily M. Smachetti, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Michael Caruso, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Miami, FL, Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, Federal Public Defender’s Office, West Palm Beach, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Swaby appeals his 120-month, below-the-guideline-range sentence, after pleading guilty to two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). On appeal, Swaby argues that he was incorrectly classified and sentenced as a career offender. Swaby argues that his previous conviction under Fla. Stat. § 893.13(1), does not qualify as a controlled substance offense under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b) because the statute does not contain a mens rea element. Although he acknowledges that in *United States v.*Smith, 775 F.3d 1262, 1268 (11th Cir. 2014), we held that § 893.13 qualifies as a controlled substance offense, he argues that *Smith*conflicts with several Supreme Court decisions.

We review constitutional sentencing challenges de novo, which includes the question of whether a defendant’s prior convictions qualify as controlled substance offenses for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b). *See Smith,*775 F.3d at 1265. And “[w]e are bound by [our] prior panel decisions unless and until we overrule them while sitting en banc, or they are overruled by the Supreme Court.” *United States v. Jordan,*635 F.3d 1181, 1189 (11th Cir. 2011). In other words, “[w]e are authorized to depart from a prior panel decision based upon an intervening Supreme Court decision only if that decision actually overruled or conflicted with it.” *United States v. Marte,*356 F.3d 1336, 1344 (11th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Swaby relies on *Begay v. United States,*553 U.S. 137, 128 S.Ct. 1581, 170 L.Ed.2d 490 (2008), *Elonis v. United States,*575 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2001, 192 L.Ed.2d 1 (2015), and *McFadden v. United States,*576 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2298, 192 L.Ed.2d 260 (2015) for the proposition that *Smith*has been overruled. However we are not convinced that those cases overrule or conflict with *Smith.*Therefore, because no Supreme Court or en banc decision has overruled the holding from *Smith,*the pri- or panel precedent rule bounds us to that *620holding. *See Marte,*356 F.3d at 1344. We affirm Swaby’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1



Written Statement of President and Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM J. VELARDO

William J. Velardo

President and Chief Executive Officer

February
12, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent *v.*John Regan, Appellant.

Argued June 9, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*509
      *Henry A. Lowenberg, Myron J. Greene*and *Francis L. Valente*for appellant. :

*Frank 8. Hogan, District Attorney (Bernard L. Alderman, Stanley H. Fuld*and *Milton H. Spiero*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion. (See 291 N. Y. 702.)

Concur: Lotjghran, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., and Rippey, J., on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04004]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Cognitive Systems Analysis and Aging.
    Date: March 9, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of 
Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37515e45435f5c5a775a565e5b19595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d2ddc6c0dcdfd9f4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04004 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Irvin Lee SMITH, Appellant, v. Mr. Dave SERNA, District Attorney, Mr. Shelly, Former Sheriff of Grant County, Mr. Lucero, the arresting officer, Mr. K. Myers, Former Under-Sheriff, Mr. Shelly, Former Deputy Sheriff, Appellees.

No. 8776.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 18, 1966.

Irvin Lee Smith, pro se.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, N. M., and L. D. Harris, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Albuquerque, N. M., on brief for appellees.

Before PICKETT and SETH, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Smith brought this civil action against several New Mexico law enforcement officials, alleging damages arising out of false arrest and imprisonment. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Smith thereupon appealed.

The appeal clearly must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment. It was not the action, but merely the complaint which was dismissed. In Garrison v. Lacey, 10 Cir., 362 F.2d 798, 799, this court stated:

> “The hazards which beset a layman when he seeks to represent himself are illustrated by this appeal. The record contains no final judgment. The order sought to be reviewed dismissed the complaint but did not dismiss the action. Hence it is nonappealable. See Midwestern Developments, Inc. v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 319 F.2d 53, certiorari denied 379 U.S. 989, 85 S.Ct. 702, 13 L.Ed.2d 610. * * * ”

See, also, Martinez v. Flores, 9 Cir., 299 F.2d 888, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is dismissed.
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 99.2

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of National Auto Credit,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), do hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Name: Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  December 12, 2002