alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
American Wagering, Inc. Financial Data Schedule Required under: Appendix A to
Item 601(c) of Regulation S-B Commercial and Industrial Companies Article 5 of
Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1


<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   1,289,061
<SECURITIES>                                               373,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                              530,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                              (78,295)
<INVENTORY>                                                680,416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           579,482
<PP&E>                                                   6,002,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (2,028,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          10,018,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,338,505
<BONDS>                                                  1,874,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                              1,892,400
<COMMON>                                                    78,857
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,842,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            10,018,375
<SALES>                                                  3,010,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,010,123
<CGS>                                                    1,765,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            2,684,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           128,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          70,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            267,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        267,180
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               267,180
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.03



</TABLE>
### Gas drilling
dkocurek@sbcglobal.net to: Nick Parsons 08/01/2010 09:27 PM

Dear Sir, I would like to encourage the EPA to begin a program to protect citizens from the potentially harmful effects of unregulated gas drilling . We have been told too many things that turned out to be true about the safety of gas drilling in our area. First the industry said there was no release of VOC's. Then after testing revealed over 20% of the wells were releasing dangerous levels of VOC 's the industry decided to perform maintenance on them to stop the leaks . Relying on the industry is not a good idea when it comes to protecting the health of our citizens . The profit motive is too great and blinds the industry decision makers . Leaving it up to our local politicians has not been shown to be a reliable method of dealing with these problems since they are too reliant on the money that the gas industry provides . I am a physician, and in our industry (which I am not particularly proud of ) we are supposed to perform testing before we subject a patient to a potentially dangerous treatment (which means any treatment). In the gas drilling industry the practice appears to be to wait until someone else discovers a problem before they look for potential danger . We need protection and

we need it now. Thank you for your interest. Sincerely, Danny Kocurek, MD
# Úradný vestník C 19A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-1037
  doi:10.3000/19771037.CA2014.019.slo |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 19A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Zväzok 5722. januára 2014 |

ISSN 1977-1037

doi:10.3000/19771037.CA2014.019.slo

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 19A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Zväzok 5722. januára 2014

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznamy |
| | ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY |
| | Európska agentúra pre lieky |
| 2014/C 019A/01 | Oznámenie o zrušení | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európska agentúra pre lieky

2014/C 019A/01

Oznámenie o zrušení

1

PREHĽAD VÝBEROVÝCH KONANÍ v Ú. v. EÚ C A

Pripojený je zoznam Ú. v. EÚ C A, ktoré boli vydané počas tohto roku.

Ak nie je uvedené inak, Ú. v. EÚ vyšli vo všetkých jazykoch.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |

5

6

11

19

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

V Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európska agentúra pre lieky

| 22.1.2014 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 19/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 19/1

---

Oznámenie o zrušení

(2014/C 19 A/01)

Európska agentúra pre lieky sa rozhodla zrušiť tieto výberové konania:

| — | EMA/CA/S/039: zmluvný zamestnanec (krátkodobá pracovná zmluva), vedecká podpora pre Európsky dohľad nad spotrebou antimikrobiálnych látok vo veterinárnom lekárstve (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1), |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/039: zmluvný zamestnanec (krátkodobá pracovná zmluva), vedecká podpora pre Európsky dohľad nad spotrebou antimikrobiálnych látok vo veterinárnom lekárstve (ESVAC) (FG IV) (1),

| — | EMA/CA/S/040: zmluvný zamestnanec (krátkodobá pracovná zmluva), vedecký sekretariát pre stanoviská Európskej komisie k rezistencii na antimikrobiálne látky, oddelenie pre veterinárne lieky (FG IV) (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

EMA/CA/S/040: zmluvný zamestnanec (krátkodobá pracovná zmluva), vedecký sekretariát pre stanoviská Európskej komisie k rezistencii na antimikrobiálne látky, oddelenie pre veterinárne lieky (FG IV) (2).

---

(1)  Ú. v. EÚ C 320 A, 6.11.2013, s. 2.

(2)  Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 1.

---
#### Adele Bernheimer *et al.,*Ex’rs, Resp'ts, v. Thomas Kilpatrick, App’lt.

*Matthew Hale,*for resp’ts; *Wm. F. MacRae,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of the general term. All concur.

Affirming 25 N. Y. State Rep., 837.
---

Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Power of the Dream Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Viktor Rozsnyay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Viktor RozsnyayViktor RozsnyayTitle:    President & Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUBSERVICER
      1123 CERTIFICATION




Re:
      Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
      Certificates, Series Trust 2006-C5






I,
      Michael J. Myers, certify that:




I
      am
      responsible for reviewing the activities performed by NorthMarq Capital, Inc.,
      as Subservicer under the aforesaid Subservicing Agreement.




A
      review
      of the Subservicer's activities during-the Reporting Period (the calendar year
      ending December 31, 2006) and of the Subserv'icer's performance under the
      aforesaid Subservicing Agreement has been made under by
      supervision.




To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, NorthMarq, as Subservicer, has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Subservicing Agreement in all
      material respects throughout the Reporting Period, except as specifically set
      forth below, or on the attachment:






NorthMarq
      Capital , Inc.




By:    
      Michael J. Meyers


Title: 
      EVP/CAO


Date: 
      2-12-07
Written Agreement amongDocket No. 08-014-WA/RB-HCCAPITAL CORP OF THE WEST
    
    08-014-WA/RB-SMMerced, CaliforniaCOUNTY BANKMerced, CaliforniaandFEDERAL RESERVE BANK 
OF SAN FRANCISCOSan Francisco, California
  Curtis Riggs




---



##### 



Board Oversight
         2




---



##### 



et seq.
  Risk Management
     3




---



##### 



Lending and Credit Administration
         4




---



##### 



Loan Review
       Asset Improvement
  5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
   7




---



##### 



Capital Plan
     Dividend Payment and Distributions
  8




---



##### 



(see
  9




---



##### 



Debt and Stock Redemption
   Earnings Plan and Budget
      10




---



##### 



Liquidity/Funds Management
       Compliance with Agreement
  11




---



##### 



Approval, Implementation, and Progress Reports
     Communications
  (a)
    
    Mr. Joe A. Lozano
Examining Officer
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 
101 Market Street, Mail Stop 920
San Francisco, California 94105
 12




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Mr. Jerry E. Callister
Chairman of the Board
Capital Corp of the West
County Bank
550 West Main Street
Merced, CA 95340
 Miscellaneous
    13




---



##### 



Capital Corp of the West
    
    
    
    Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoBy:
    
    /s/ Curtis Riggs
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Steve HoffmanSteve HoffmanCounty BankBy:
    
    /s/ Curtis Riggs
 14
#### Phillips *v.*The State.

No. 13261.

May 14, 1940.

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the overruling of a motion for new trial based on the general grounds only, and an examination of the record disclosing that the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the verdict having received the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*All the Justices concw.*

*227
      *A. G. Smith*and *Claude C. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, Daniel L. Duke, Herschel E. Smith*and *C. E. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general,*contra.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-71-2021]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 38--Spartanburg County, South Carolina; 
Authorization of Production Activity; Swafford Warehousing, Inc. 
(Medical Kits), Greer, South Carolina

    On November 1, 2021, the South Carolina State Ports Authority, 
grantee of FTZ 38, submitted a notification of proposed production 
activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Swafford Warehousing, Inc., 
within FTZ 38, in Greer, South Carolina.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (86 FR 61756, November 8, 2021). On 
March 1, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: March 1, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04609 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Eddin Julio TUMAX-TUY, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 12-71637

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*605Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

Eddin Julio Tumax-Tuy, Pro Se

Lindsay Corliss, Ada Elsie Bosque, Senior Litigation Counsel, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eddin Julio Tumax-Tuy, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. *Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

To the extent Tumax-Tuy seeks prose-cutorial discretion before this court, we lack jurisdiction to consider such a request. *See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder,*688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Tu-max-Tu/s challenges to the BIA’s December 28, 2011, order dismissing his direct appeal because he did not timely file a petition for review of that order. *See Stone v. INS,*514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (deadline for filing a petition for review from a final order of removal is “mandatory and jurisdictional”).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Tumax-Tuy’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s May 4, 2012, order. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Alejandro LICEA-CERDA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 15-41723 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed July 12, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Alejandro Licea-Cerda, Pro Se

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Licea-Cerda has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Licea-Cerda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that *779the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5,4.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6879 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the diagnosis, 

maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic agricultural equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2023 

Mrs. SPARTZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 17, United States Code, to provide for the 

diagnosis, maintenance, and repair of certain digital electronic agricultural equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm Freedom to Re5 pair Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6879 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIAGNOSIS, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF CER2 TAIN DIGITAL ELECTRONIC AGRICULTURAL 

3 EQUIPMENT. 

4 Section 1201 of title 17, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(l) DIAGNOSIS, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR OF

8 DIGITAL ELECTRONIC AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT.—(1) 

9 Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), it 

10 is not a violation of that subsection for a person, for the 

11 purpose of the diagnosis, maintenance, or repair of digital 

12 electronic agricultural equipment, to circumvent a techno13 logical measure that effectively controls access to a work 

14 protected under this title. 

15 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 

16 (a)(2), it is not a violation of that subsection for a person, 

17 for the purpose of the diagnosis, maintenance, or repair 

18 of digital electronic agricultural equipment, to manufac19 ture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traf20 fic in any technology, product, service, device, component, 

21 or part thereof described in that subsection. 

22 ‘‘(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 

23 (b)(1), it is not a violation of that subsection for a person, 

24 for the purpose of the diagnosis, maintenance, or repair 

25 of digital electronic agricultural equipment, to manufac26 ture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise trafVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:27 Jan 09, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6879.IH H6879
3 

•HR 6879 IH

1 fic in any technology, product, service, device, component, 

2 or part thereof described in that subsection. 

3 ‘‘(4) For the purposes of this subsection, the term 

4 ‘digital electronic agricultural equipment’ means any agri5 cultural product dependent, in whole or in part, upon at6 tached or embedded digital electronics to function.’’. 

Æ
# **Exhibit 32.3**

 

**BRAUN CONSULTING, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                Inconnection with the amendment to the Annual Report of BraunConsulting, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Braun, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Steven J. Braun                                  |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Steven J. Braun                                      |   |
| *Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| April 29, 2004                                       |   |
|                                                 |   |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6887 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

86 Main Street in Haverstraw, New York, as the ‘‘Paul Piperato Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Mr. LAWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 86 Main Street in Haverstraw, New York, 

as the ‘‘Paul Piperato Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAUL PIPERATO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 86 Main Street in Haverstraw, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Paul 

7 Piperato Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6887 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paul Piperato Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### William Hodson, as Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, on the Complaint of Bertha Hoff, Respondent, *v.*William Hoff, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 1943;

decided December 8, 1943.

*Noah Seedman*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion to resettle order of October 14, 1943, granted. Chapter 777 of the Laws of 1942* has removed from the statute those provisions which previously authorized the court to grant costs upon appeals from orders made in filiation proceedings in the city of New York.

*

 Amdg. New York City Criminal Courts Act in relation to security for costs on appeal.— [Rep.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos CORONA-PEDROZA, also known as Carlos Michell Corona, also known as Carlos Pedroza Corona, also known as Carlos Mitchell Corona-Pedraza, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-20711 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of, Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Carlos Corona-Pedroza, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Corona-Pedroza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Corona-Pedroza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.