alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Andrew S. Wheeler, Respondent, *v.*Patrick Scully et al., Defendants, Alexander A. Cabre, Purchaser, Appellant.

The service of summons by publication in an action for foreclosure under the provisions of subdivision 6 of section 135 of the Code, which provides for service upon unknown parties having an interest in the mortgaged premises, is valid and binding, although, it appears that the unknown party is an infant.

(Submitted June 11, 1872;

decided November 12, 1872.)

Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial district, affirming an order of Special Term directing appellant, the purchaser upon a mortgaged sale herein, to complete the purchase, or in case of his refusal directing a re-sale, holding him liable for any deficiency.

This was an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by defendant, Patrick Scully. Shortly after making the mortgage, and in 1853, the mortgagor left the State and has not since been heard from. Service of the summons was made by publication under subdivision 6 of section 135 of the Code, providing for service upon unknown parties having an interest. Judgment was perfected, and upon the sale the premises were bid off by Cabré, the appellant. He refused to take title and complete the purchase upon the ground that from the length of time which had elapsed it was to be presumed that the mortgagor was dead; that it was as much to be presumed that his heirs-at-law were infants as that they were adults; and if infants the judgment did not bar them, as the service of summons was not sufficient as against infants.

Whereupon motion was made to compel him to complete the purchase. *Held,*that if it be conceded that the presumption *668was that the mortgagor was dead (as to which the court expressed doubts), and if the unknown heirs were infants, they were bound by the service, as subdivision 6 of section 135 made no exception in case the unknown defendants were infants. But if otherwise, there was no presumption that they were infants; and this was for the puachaser to show, in order to justify his refusal.

*8. W. Games*for the appellant.

*A. H.*and *W. E. Osburn*for the respondent.

Folgee, J.,

reads opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           14017
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   244579
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7857
<INVENTORY>                                     124270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                381331
<PP&E>                                          189994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  812089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           290008
<BONDS>                                         214158
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      204836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    812089
<SALES>                                         245126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                245126
<CGS>                                           178039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   178039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2574
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1290
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Harmon H. Hart, App’lt, *v.*Theodore W. Myers *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*Michael H. Cardozo,*for app’lt; *A. J. Simpson,*for resp’ts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 36 N. Y. State Rep., 641.
[Crim. No. 882.

First Appellate District, Division One.

December 9, 1919.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of ERNEST G. BOOTH for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

[l] Habeas Corpus—Previous Presentation op Question on Appeal Former Adverse Decision Final.-—Where the precise question presented by a petition for a writ of *habeas corpus*has been considered on an appeal from the judgment and decided adversely to the petitioner, the petition will be denied.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Ernest Gr. Booth, *in pro. per.,*for Petitioner.

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of *hateas corpus.*The petitioner, who is confined in the California state prison at San Quentin, was sentenced by the superior court, in and for the county of Butte, on Septem*661ber 24, 1917, “for the indeterminate term of one to fourteen years, ’ ’ after having entered a plea of guilty to the crime of forgery, committed on the eighteenth day of June, 1917, before the indeterminate sentence law of this state went into effect. Thereafter, and pursuant to the personal request of the petitioner, the court made an order for his return into court, to the end that a legal judgment might be pronounced and entered in the case, following the procedure laid down in *In the Matter of the Application of Charles Lee for a Writ of Habeas Corpus,*177 Cal. 690, [171 Pac. 958]. The defendant was, on the twenty-second day of March, sentenced to serve a term of five years in the state penitentiary at San Quentin. The defendant thereupon in open court gave notice of, and thereafter perfected, an appeal from the judgment. [1] The precise questions, presented by this petition, were considered by the district court of appeal for the third appellate district and were decided adversely to the appellant. *(People*v. Booth, 37 Cal. App. 650, [174 Pac. 685].)

The petition for the issuance of a writ of *habeas corpus*is, therefore, denied.
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the period ended March 31, 2010 of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Kenneth J. Mahon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









May 10, 2010


Date









By:  /s/ KENNETH
J. MAHON


Kenneth J. Mahon


First Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Lena Schwartz, Respondent, *v.*Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant.

Argued December 1, 1943;

decided January 6, 1944.

*771
      *William R. McDermott, James D. Ewing*and *Eugene Z. Du Bose*for appellant.

*Morton Miller*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed  Consolidated  Statements of
Earnings on the second  quarter  Form 10Q and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

   <S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-2000
<CASH>                                         430,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,303,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,995,000
<PP&E>                                       6,396,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,909,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,943,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,767,000
<BONDS>                                      1,131,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,417,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,943,000
<SALES>                                      4,313,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,313,000
<CGS>                                        2,959,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               139,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                343,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            218,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97



</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6885 

To amend title 3, United States Code, to include under the Electoral Count 

Act of 1887 that the vote of an elector of a State shall not be counted 

if, with respect to the election for President, the State did not include 

on the ballot in the State a candidate for President who was nominated 

by a major political party, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BURLISON, 

Mr. HARRIS, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. NEHLS, Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER, Mrs. LUNA, and Mr. OGLES) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend title 3, United States Code, to include under 

the Electoral Count Act of 1887 that the vote of an 

elector of a State shall not be counted if, with respect 

to the election for President, the State did not include 

on the ballot in the State a candidate for President 

who was nominated by a major political party, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6885 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Presidential Ballot In3 tegrity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REJECTION OF ELECTORAL VOTES OF A STATE IN 

5 CERTAIN CASES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15(e)(1)(B) of title 3, 

7 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘if, with re8 spect to the State of the elector in question, a candidate 

9 for President who was nominated by a major political 

10 party for election to such office did not appear on the bal11 lot of the State or’’ after ‘‘shall not be counted’’. 

12 (b) MAJOR POLITICAL PARTY DEFINED.—Section 15 

13 of title 3, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

14 the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(f) MAJOR POLITICAL PARTY DEFINED.—For pur16 poses of this section, the term ‘major political party’ has 

17 the meaning given the term ‘major party’ in section 9002 

18 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             134,217
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,962,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10,000
<INVENTORY>                                      7,654,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,000,216
<PP&E>                                              79,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                      39,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,679,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,112,692
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            590
<COMMON>                                               491
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,566,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,679,890
<SALES>                                         10,957,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,957,982
<CGS>                                            9,923,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,923,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    158,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                117,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       117,278
<EPS-BASIC>                                            .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .02



</TABLE>
Opinion filed Dec ember 17, 20 09



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

___________ 

### No. 1 1- 09 -0 02 54 -CR

____ ____ __ OLA N F LOY D B OAT WRIGHT , A ppellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 142nd District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR 32240

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Th is i s an a

pp e a l f ro m a jud g me nt a dju dic a tin g g uil t. We dis mis s. Ol an F loyd B oatw ri g ht o ri g ina lly e nte re d a ple a of g uil ty to the of fe ns e of a g g ra vate d a ssa ult with a dea dly

wea pon. Pursuant to the plea ba rg ain ag ree ment, the adjudicat i o n o f h is guilt was defe rre d, and he was place d on community supervision for ten y ear s. At the hear ing on the State’s motion to adjudicate, appellant enter ed pleas of t rue to the allegations that he viol ated the te rms and co n d i t i o n s of his community supervision. The tria l court found that the a lleg ations were true,2

revoke d his community supervision, adjudicate d his g uilt, and im posed a sentenc e of c onfinement fo r e ig ht y e a rs . Appellant’s c ourt -ap p o i n t edco u n s el h as fi l eda m o t i o nt o wi th dra w. T h e m o t i o ni s s upported by a br ie f i n w hic h c ouns e l pr of e ssi on a lly and

c on sc ie nti ou sly

e xami ne s th e re c or d a

nd a pp lic a ble law and states that he ha s conclude d that t h e appea l is frivolous. Counsel has provided appe llant wi th a c op y of the br ie f a

nd a dv ise d a

pp e lla nt o f h is r ig ht t o r e vie w the re c or d and fi le a re sp on se to counsel’s brie f. A response has not be en filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 3 86 U. S. 7 38 (1 96 7) ; In re Sc hulman , 2 5 2 S. W. 3 d 4 0 3 ( T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 08 ); Sta

ffo rd v . S tat e , 8 13 S.W. 2d

50 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 91 ); H i gh v . Stat e , 5 73 S.W. 2d 807 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tat e , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Ga ino us v . S

tat e , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Ea den v . S tat e , 161 S.W .3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.)

. Following the proc edure s outlined in An de rs , we have independe ntly revie wed the r ecor d, and we a g re e that the a

pp e a l is wi tho ut me ri t. We not e that couns e l ha s th e re sp on sib ili ty to a dv ise a pp e lla nt t hat he may

fi le a pe tit ion fo r d isc re tio na

ry re vie w b y

the Te xas C ourt

of Cr imi na l App e a ls. Ex parte Owens , 206 S.W .3d 670 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). L ikewise, this court a dvises appellant that he may

file a pe tition for discretionar y revie w pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 66. Bl ack v . S tat e , 217 S.W .3d 687 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2007, no pet.)

. The motion to withdraw is g rante d, and the a ppeal is dismissed.
PER C URI AM
Dec ember

17, 2009 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , an d

S t r an g e , J.
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Matthew Siegel, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Time Warner Cable Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                            
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | April 28, 2016 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Matthew Siegel                                                                                                                         
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Name:  Matthew Siegel                                                                                                                      
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Title:    Senior Vice President and Treasurer
and Acting Co-Chief Financial Officer
(Co-Principal Financial Officer)
Time Warner Cable Inc.
ORIX Real Estate
Capital Markets, LLC
Paul Smyth
1717 Main Street, 12th Floor
Dallas, TX 75201
214-237-2010

March 3, 2000

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
Special Servicing

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This  Officer's  Certificate  is  provided  to you by ORIX Real  Estate  Capital
Markets, LLC ("ORECM") pursuant to the terms outlined in the applicable sections
of certain  Agreements as referenced in the attached  Exhibit A, relative to the
securitization for which ORECM serves as Special Servicer.

The  undersigned  officer,  on behalf of ORECM,  hereby  inform you (i) that,  a
review of the  activities  of ORECM as Special  Servicer and of its  performance
under  each  respective   agreement  has  been  made  under  the   undersigned's
supervision for the period of time commencing  January 1, 1999 through  December
31,  1999 or a portion  thereof,  (ii) that,  to the best of such  undersigned's
knowledge,  based on such review,  it has fulfilled all of its obligations under
the agreement and has maintained an effective  internal  control system relating
to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it,  throughout  such period,
and (iii) that, the undersigned has received no notice regarding  qualification,
nor challenging the status of the REMIC's from the IRS or any other governmental
body.

Also, please find attached, an Annual Independent Public Accountant's  Servicing
Report performed by Pricewaterhouse Coopers, L.L.P. relative to the assets being
serviced by ORECM for the period beginning  January 1, 1999 through December 31,
1999.

Duplicates  of these  documents  are being  simultaneously  sent to all  parties
listed on Exhibit B for receipt by March 15, 2000.

If you have any questions or comments relative to the attached documents, please
call me at 214-237-2010.

Sincerely,

ORIX Real Estate
Capital Markets, LLC


By:
           Paul Smyth
           Managing Director, Servicing

Attachments:

Annual Independent Public Accountant's Servicing Report
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 12475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4635-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Washington; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Washington (FEMA-4635-DR), dated January 5, 2022, and related 
determinations.

DATES: The amendment was issued January 27, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this declared disaster is now November 5, 2021, through and 
including December 2, 2021.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04590 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P