alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shabtai Adlersberg,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:




(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: June
      30, 2009/s/
      SHABTAI ADLERSBERGShabtai
      AdlersbergChief
      Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Louis P. Goldberg and Frank Monaco, Individually and as Duly Designated Candidates of the American Labor Party, Kings County, for the Public Offices of City Councilmen of the City of New York, Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Richard Mazza and Abraham Bernknopf, Respondents.

Argued October 22, 1943;

decided October 22, 1943.

*685
      *Israel Gonvisser*for appellants.

*Leo J. Linder*and *Victor Babinowits*for Richard Mazza and Abraham Bernknopf, respondents.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2004  (the  "Report"), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  13,  2004

                              /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Allen  E.  Kahn
                              Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.


















                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
#### State Board of Education *et al. v.*Board of Public Education for Savannah and Chatham County.

No. 13362.

June 21, 1940.

Rehearing denied July 13, 1940.

Bell, Justice.

The questions in this case are controlled by the decision heretofore rendered on this date, in *State Board of Education*V. *County Board of Education of Richmond County,*ante.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*598
      *ElUs G. Arnall, attorney-general, E. J. Clower*and *Marshall L.*

*Allison, assistant attorney s-general,*for plaintiffs in error. *Isaac 8. Peebles Jr.,*contra.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6652 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6652

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of 
      small business loan data related to LGBTQI-owned businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2023

   Mr. Torres of New York (for himself, Mr. Allred, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. 
Blumenauer, Ms. Bonamici, Ms. Castor of Florida, Ms. Chu, Ms. Davids of 
 Kansas, Mr. Evans, Mr. Foster, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Garcia of 
Texas, Mr. Goldman of New York, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. 
 Grijalva, Mrs. Hayes, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, Mr. Kim of New 
  Jersey, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Moore of 
 Wisconsin, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Nickel, Ms. Norton, Mr. Payne, Mr. Pocan, 
  Ms. Salinas, Ms. Schakowsky, Mrs. Sykes, Mr. Takano, Ms. Titus, Mr. 
    Tonko, Ms. Velazquez, and Ms. Wilson of Florida) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of 
      small business loan data related to LGBTQI-owned businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``LGBTQI Business Equal Credit 
Enforcement and Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION.

    Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691c-
2) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``LGBTQI-owned,'' after ``minority-
        owned,'' each place such term appears;
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)(G), by inserting ``, sexual 
        orientation, gender identity, intersex status'' after ``sex''; 
        and
            (3) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) LGBTQI-owned business.--The term `LGBTQI-owned 
        business' means a business--
                    ``(A) more than 50 percent of the ownership or 
                control of which is held by 1 or more individuals self-
                identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, 
                queer, or intersex; and
                    ``(B) more than 50 percent of the net profit or 
                loss of which accrues to 1 or more individuals self-
                identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, 
                queer, or intersex.''.
                                 <all>
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01298

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 01298\01298_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01298\01298_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 01298\01298_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01298\01298_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01298\01298_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01298\01298_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01298\01298_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01298\Certification Statement_01298.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Ash handling.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Birchwood aerial boundary.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Site Location Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01298\Supplemental Documents\01298_Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Financial Officer,

As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.

I, F. Clay
Creasey, Jr., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2009 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|December 9, 2009                                 
|                                                 
|/s/    F. Clay Creasey,
Jr.                      
|F. Clay Creasey, Jr.                             
|Executive Vice President -Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Richard MONTGOMERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joe COAKLEY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6451

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 9, 2017

Decided: August 24, 2017

Richard Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Montgomery, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Montgomery’s motion to amend his informal brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Montgomery v. Coakley,*No. 3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA, 2017 WL 1129977 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### John C. CARRINGTON; Deborah T. Carrington, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMB HOLDCO LLC; OneWest Bank, FSB, Defendants-Appellees, and Steven T. Mnuchin, Defendant.

No. 16-2190

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 29, 2017

Decided: July 6, 2017

John Thomas Irick, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN THOMAS IRICK, Washington, DC, for Appellants. Rik S. Tozzi, Richard Carlton Keller, BURR & FORMAN LLP, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellees.

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Carrington and Deborah T. Carrington appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm *716for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Carrington v. Mnuchin,*No. 5:13-cv-03422-JMC, 2016 WL 4771288 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 10.3 Board of Directors Resolutions


Exhibit 10.3




LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC.

3276 Buford Drive, Bldg. 104, Suite 320, Buford, GA 30519




UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF DIRECTORS OF LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC. IN LIEU OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LAUFER BRIDGE ENTERPRISES, INC. (A NEVADA CORPORATION)




Pursuant to the Authority granted to directors to take action by unanimous consent without a meeting pursuant to Nevada General Corporation Law 78.315 (pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation) of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (“Laufer”) the Board of Directors (“Directors”) of Laufer, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do hereby consent to adopt, ratify, confirm and approve, as of the date indicated below, the following recitals and resolutions, as evidenced by their signature hereunder:




WHEREAS, the Directors have been presented with the proposal to authorize the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for relief of debt owed by the Company in the amount of Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars represented by a Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollar Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”) dated September 13, 2008;




WHEREAS, the Directors shall specifically authorize the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to First Trust Management;




WHEREAS, the Directors believe it is in the best interest of the Company to authorize the issuance of the common stock to First Trust Management in exchange for relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note as set forth herein;




NOW, BE IT RESOLVED, that it is hereby authorized and approved to issue 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company to First Trust Management in exchange for relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note.




GENERAL RESOLUTIONS




RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are hereby authorized and instructed to take whatever steps necessary to effectuate the above described resolutions.




FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Promissory Note shall be restated and amended to show that a payment in the amount of $10,000 on the Promissory Note has been satisfied by the Company.




(Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow)








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set forth their hands in their capacity as of this 27th day of April, 2012.




/s/ Bill Chaaban                                    

Bill Chaaban, President, CEO, Director




/s/ Reid Stone                                        

REID STONE, Vice President, Director






2
#### RYAN vs. RYAN.

Appeal from Tarrant county.

*Attachment*— Interueniion—Marital *Rights*— Charge *of the Court*— Practice—Case *Stated*— The wife sued her husband for debt and ran an attachment. Her husband’s creditors intervened, setting up that the proceedings in the suit proper were conclusive ; that plaintiff and defendant, were husband and wife 5 that the debts *64and property levied on were community. Upon this state of case the court charged that the wife, because of her conjugal relation to the defendant in the suit proper, was not entitled to an attachment against the community property, whereby she could secure rights superior to other creditors, who held just debts against the community. Under the marital laws in force in this state the wife can maintain a suit against the husband to protect her separate property. 35 Tex., 471, and 52 Tex., 298, are cases in point.

Reversed and remanded.

West, J.
## Cody-YellowstoneAir Improvement Resources
February 23, 2013 Michael Martin Essential Air Service US Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20590 DearMr. Martin: "Promoting Commercial Air Service for the BighornBasin"

... \ .l ><·''

On behalfofCody-Yellowstone Air Improvement Resources, I would like to support SkyWest Airline's Essential Air Service Proposal for Cody, Wyoming. I have reviewed the proposal and find it adequate to meetthe presentneeds ofour community. The counties and cities in the Bighorn Basin recognize the value ofthe Essential Air Service Program in bringing commercial air service to our part of Wyoming. With some of our communities located more than 100 miles from a freeway, they really appreciate scheduled air service. Sincerely, Raymond Lee Administrator

CYAIR P. 0.Box 1448 Cody, Wyoming 82414 rayleecyair.gmail.com (602)-315-0604
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30,  2003  (the  "Report"),  I,  Allen  E.  Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November  12,  2003

                                   /s/  Allen  E.  Kahn
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Allen  E.  Kahn
                                   Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.





                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis Bernal ANGULO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6072

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed June 30, 2017

(D.C. No. 5:16-CR-00071-R-1) (W.D. Oklahoma)

Kerry Blackburn, Steven W. Creager, Office of the United States Attorney, Western District of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

. After entering into a plea agreement, Jose Luis Bernal Angulo pleaded guilty to *552one count of possessing methamphetamine with the intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). In the agreement, Mr. Angulo expressly waived “his right to appeal his guilty plea,” and “his sentence as imposed by the Court ... and the manner in which the sentence is determined!,]” provided the sentence is not “above the advisory guideline range determined by the Court to apply” in his case. Plea Agt. at ¶ 8(a),(b).

In addition to the plea agreement that stated the waivers were knowing and voluntary, *see*Plea Agt. at ¶ 8, the district court confirmed at the plea hearing that Mr. Angulo understood the waivers in the plea agreement, *see*Plea Hr’g Tr. at 8-9.

The district court sentenced Mr. Angulo to 180 months’ imprisonment — below the advisory guideline range of 360 months to life imprisonment. Notwithstanding the appeal waivers, Mr. Angulo filed a notice of appeal.

The government has filed a motipn to enforce the plea agreement pursuant to *United States v. Hahn,*359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per cu-riam). In response, Mr. Angulo’s counsel has stated that there are no non-frivolous arguments that can be presented in response to the motion to enforce, citing *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel. This court gave Mr. Angulo an opportunity to file a pro se response to the motion to enforce. The deadline for filing a response has passed and Mr. Angulo has not filed anything with this court.

Under *Anders,*we have conducted an independent review of the motion and the record and we conclude that Mr. Angulo’s proposed appeal falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and that enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice. *See Hahn,*359 F.3d at 1325-28 (describing the factors this court considers when determining whether to enforce a waiver of appellate rights).

The motion to enforce is granted and this appeal is dismissed. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

*

 This panel has determined that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and 'collateral estoppel. It *552may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed, R. App. P. 32.1 and *553lOthCir. R. 32.1.
#### Julius P. Chesebrough, App’lt, *v.*Daniel D. Conover, Resp’t.

See 36 N. Y. State Rep., 644.

*Lewis Sanders,*for app’lt; *Austen G. Fox,*for resp’t.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur.
EXHIBIT 31

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT



I, John G. Perry, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Reva, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effective-
         ness of  the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
         as of the Evaluation Date;

<PAGE>

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  January 14, 2004

/s/ John G. Perry
-----------------------
John G. Perry,
CEO & CFO