alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Официален вестник C 34/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0855
  doi:10.3000/19770855.C_2014.034.bul |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 34 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 575 февруари 2014 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

doi:10.3000/19770855.C_2014.034.bul

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 34

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 575 февруари 2014 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейски парламент |
| 2014/C 034/01 | Решение | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейски парламент

2014/C 034/01

Решение

1

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейски парламент

| 5.2.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2014

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 34/1

---

РЕШЕНИЕ

2014/C 34/01

ГЕНЕРАЛНИЯТ СЕКРЕТАР НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ,

като взе предвид Регламент (ЕИО, Евратом, ЕОВС) No 259/68 на Съвета (1), изменен с Регламент (ЕО, Евратом) No 723/2004 на Съвета (2) и на последно място с Регламент (ЕС, Евратом) No 1080/2010 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 24 ноември 2010 г. за изменение на Правилника за длъжностните лица на Европейските общности и Условията за работа на другите служители на Европейските общности (3), и по-специално член 30 от този правилник,

като взе предвид решението на Бюрото от 3 май 2004 г. относно предоставянето на правомощия на орган по назначаването и на орган, оправомощен да сключва трудови договори (ОСТД), последно изменено от Бюрото на 4 май 2009 г.,

като взе предвид датата на изтичане на долупосочените резервни списъци на Европейския парламент на 31 декември 2013 г.:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S,

като има предвид, че съгласно член 10а от Правилника съвместната комисия е приканена да излезе със становище в рамките на срок от 15 работни дни,

РЕШИ:

Член 1

Валидността на резервните списъци:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, PE/96/S, PE/110/S, PE/121/S

се удължава до 31 декември 2014 г.

Член 2

Валидността на резервните списъци:

PE/99/S, PE/109/S, AST/5/08, PE/119/S

не се удължава.

Люксембург, 20 декември 2013 година.

Klaus WELLE

Генерален секретар

---

(1)  ОВ L 56, 4.3.1968 г., стр. 1.

1

(2)  ОВ L 124, 27.4.2004 г., стр. 1.

2

(3)  ОВ L 311, 26.11.2010 г., стр. 1.

3

---
#### SIOMIA, Plaintiff v. FALATOGO and SITAUA, Defendants

No. 17-1917

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [“Matai” title: “Toilolo” of Fagali’i]

November 19, 1919

A. M. NOBLE, *Judge of the High Court;*MOLIOO and LEAANA, *Associate Judges*

FINAL JUDGMENT

This case coming on to be heard and being heard before Judges, A. M. Noble, Molioo and Leaana, on the 19th day of November, 1919, and it appearing to the Court that all matters in dispute have been amicably settled by the parties to this action.

It is therefore, ordered, considered and adjudged, with and by the consent of the parties, Plaintiff and Defendants, that the said Sitaua, is by and with the consent of the members of the TOILOLO family permitted to register himself in the records of “Matai Titles” in the office of the Secretary of Native Affairs of American Samoa, under the “matai” name “Toilolo,” of the village of Fagali’i.

*314It is further ordered, considered and adjudged that the cost, $20.00 shall be divided equally between Plaintiffs and Defendants.

This the 19th day of November, 1919.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Americam Wagering, Inc.
Financial Data Schedule Required under:
Appendix A to Item 601(c) of Regulation S-B
Commercial and Industrial Companies
Article 5 of Regulation S-X
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                      10,099,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,206,454
<PP&E>                                       8,616,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,936,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,616,548
<BONDS>                                      5,087,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,376
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,153,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,936,363
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,891,018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,287,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,247,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (476,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (476,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (476,185)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          28,841
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             600
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    150,346
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          31,702
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            31,300
<LOANS>                                        394,980
<ALLOWANCE>                                      7,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,443
<DEPOSITS>                                     556,500
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,698
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,315
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,808
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 640,443
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,899
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,543
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   451
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,893
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,778
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,937
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           21,956
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,323
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,078
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,960
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,960
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,896
<LOANS-PAST>                                        16
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,542
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,918
<RECOVERIES>                                       362
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Kathryne S. Tontrup et al., Appellants, *v.*Rector Church Warden and Vestrymen of St. Bartholomew’s Church in the City of New York, Respondents.

Argued November 30, 1943;

decided January 13, 1944.

*805
      *Francis J. Hughes*for appellants.

*Lyman A. Spalding*and *Robert E. Curran*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ. Conway, J., dissents on the ground questions of fact were presented for the jury as to defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 22, 2004 |  | /s/ Michael A. Baker                                  
|                         |  | Michael A. Baker President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of the written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ArthroCare Corporation and will be retained by ArthroCare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7004 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7004

 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to amend references of gilsonite to 
                              asphaltite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2024

 Mr. Curtis (for himself, Mr. Moore of Utah, Ms. Maloy, and Mr. Owens) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to amend references of gilsonite to 
                              asphaltite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MINERAL AMENDMENT TO THE MINERAL LEASING ACT.

    The first section of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181) and 
sections 21, 27, 34, 39, and 43 of that Act (30 U.S.C. 241, 184, 182, 
209, 226-3) are amended by striking ``gilsonite'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``asphaltite''.
                                 <all>
```
1

NO. 03-14-00402-CR

REX ALLEN NISBETT § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

§

v. § THIRD DISTRICT 

§

STATE OF TEXAS § AUSTIN, TEXAS 

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

NOW COMES THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee, by and through her 

Assistant District Attorney, John C. Prezas, and moves the Court, pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(d), to extend the deadline for filing the State’s brief. 

In support of its motion, the State would show the Court the following: 

1. The State’s Brief in this case is due on June 8, 2015. 

2. No previous extensions of time have been requested by the State or granted by this 

Court. 

3. Appellant’s brief was filed in this Court on May 8, 2015.

4. Mr. Prezas filed a State’s brief in 03-13-00794-CR, State v. Yazdi, on April 21, 

2015. Mr. Prezas recently filed the State’s proposed findings of fact and 

conclusions of law on May 21, 2015, in Ex Parte Rolando Bacon Lopez, 10-1053-

K368A, a habeas corpus proceeding. Mr. Prezas has also recently filed proposed 

findings of fact and conclusions of law in the following other habeas corpus 

proceedings: Ex Parte Robert Jesse Padilla, 06-937-K368A; Ex Parte Robert Jesse 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00402-CR

5578386

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/8/2015 10:39:58 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/8/2015 10:39:58 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

Padilla, 06-921-K368A; Ex Parte Daniel Robert Lock, 94-085-K277A; Ex Parte 

Daniel Robert Lock 97-780-K277A

5. Mr. Prezas filed a State’s brief on or before May 21, 2015, in response to the Court 

of Criminal Appeals granting the State’s petition for discretionary review in John 

Alan Wachtendorf, PD-0280-15. Mr. Prezas submitted a State’s Motion to Dismiss 

in State vs. Gregory Michael Klapesky 03-15-00244-CR on June 5, 2015.

6. Currently, Mr. Prezas is evaluating a request for DNA testing under Chapter 64 in 

03-1063-K277 State vs. Gregory Michael Klapesky and is working towards the July 

1, 2015, due date for the State’s brief in State vs. James Alan Weatherford 03-14-

00527-CR.

7. For the foregoing reasons, The State respectfully requests that the deadline for 

filing its brief in the above stated cause be extended for an additional sixty (60)

days from the current due date of June 8, 2015, to August 7, 2015.
3

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State of Texas respectfully 

requests that this Court grant its motion for an extension of time and extend the State’s 

deadline to file its brief to August 7, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Jana Duty

District Attorney

Williamson County, Texas

/s/ John C. Prezas

John C. Prezas

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar Number 24041722

405 Martin Luther King #1

Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 943-1248

(512) 943-1255 (fax)

jprezas@wilco.org

Certificate of Service

This is to certify that on June 8, 2015, a copy of the foregoing motion has been 

sent to Appellant’s attorney of record, Kristen, 207 S. Austin Ave., Georgetown, TX 

78626, by eservice at Kristen@txcrimapp.com.

/s/ John C. Prezas 

John C. Prezas
#### Catherine J. Bannin, Respondent, *v.*Charles Peck, Appellant.

Submitted October 8, 1943;

decided November 24, 1943.

*718
      *Frederick E. Zane*for appellant.

*Thomas J. Bannin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lotjghran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
#### Owen Columbus BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22658.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1967.

See also 5 Cir., 367 F.2d 145.

Douglas M. Andrews, DeFuniak Springs, Fla., for appellant.

Murray M. Wadsworth, Asst. U. S. Atty., Clinton Ashmore, U. S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before BROWN, GEWIN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted below for selling whiskey without tax stamps affixed on October 31, 1963, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5205(a) (2), 5604(a) (1). Appellant now claims that proof of earlier events associating him and his confederates with the moonshine operation was inadmissible. We find this claim to be without merit because the earlier acts were reasonably related to the time and place of the act covered by the indictment. Indeed, proof of these earlier acts was necessary to explain that the occurrence of October 31 was in fact a sale of whiskey by Appellant through his agents.

With respect to the claim that when compared with the testimony given in the Tampa Division case (5 Cir., 367 F.2d 145), this day decided, the informer gave false testimony to the knowledge of the Government, there is simply nothing *145in either one or both of the records considered alone or together to support this charge.

We also find no merit in Appellant’s claim that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. The jury, under proper instructions from the trial Judge, was clearly justified in finding the Appellant guilty.

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lucia Nayyar, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael Gross, J.), rendered March 9, 2001, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing her *388to a term of one year, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 20, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly considered by the court, and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see *People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). There was sufficient evidence to corroborate the child victim’s unsworn testimony (see *People v*Groff, 71 NY2d 101, 109-110 [1987]; *People v Daniels,*37 NY2d 624, 630 [1975]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecutor and the five-year-old victim’s foster mother to have a private conversation with the victim in the middle of her testimony (see *People v Branch,*83 NY2d 663 [1994]). This conference was for the sole purpose of comforting the child and it could not have caused any prejudice to defendant.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10. The newly discovered evidence would not have affected the verdict *(see People v Salemi,*309 NY 208, 215-216 [1955]), the prosecutor did not violate *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83 [1963]), and the record establishes that trial counsel provided effective assistance *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Loreto RAMOS-PABLO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11706 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 3, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern *320District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jerry Van Beard, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Laura S. Harper, Esq., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Loreto Ramos-Pablo pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal from the United States and was sentenced to 41 months in prison, to be followed by a two-year term of supervised release. Ramos-Pablo argues on appeal that his indictment failed to invoke the sentencing enhancement in 8 U.S.C.. § 1326(b)(2), as his indictment failed to allege the existence of a prior conviction. He contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for a conviction under § 1326(a) and violates his due process rights.

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, asserting that Ramos-Pablo’s argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). As Ramos-Pablo concedes that his argument is foreclosed and is raised only to preserve it for further review, summary affirmance is appropriate. *See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             181
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,331
<ALLOWANCES>                                       757
<INVENTORY>                                      2,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,987
<PP&E>                                           3,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,668)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,056
<SALES>                                          1,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,519
<CGS>                                            1,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>