alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6690 

To amend the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act to authorize the 

use of Commodity Credit Corporation funds for emergency assistance 

to dairy producers in the case of livestock relocation and feed crop 

losses due to natural disasters, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. VALADAO (for himself and Mr. DUARTE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act 

to authorize the use of Commodity Credit Corporation 

funds for emergency assistance to dairy producers in 

the case of livestock relocation and feed crop losses due 

to natural disasters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING AUTHORITY FOR LIVESTOCK RELO4 CATION AND FEED CROP LOSSES DUE TO 

5 NATURAL DISASTERS. 

6 Section 5 of the Commodity Credit Corporation Char7 ter Act (15 U.S.C. 714c) is amended— 

2 

•HR 6690 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as sub2 section (i); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(h) Provide emergency assistance to dairy and live6 stock producers for livestock relocation, shelter-in-place, 

7 and feed crop losses due to natural disasters.’’. 

Æ
#### VIDEOSHARE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff-Appellant v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation, Youtube, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees

2016-2438

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 16, 2017

Gregory S. Dovel, Dovel *&*Luner, LLP, Santa Monica, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Simon Franzini, Richard Elgar Lyon, III.

Paul Alessio Mezzina, King <7⁄8 Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Daryl Joseffer.

(Prost, Chief Judge, O’Malley and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
# Europos Sąjungos C 11A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0960
  doi:10.3000/19770960.CA2014.011.lit |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 11A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir prane_imai | 57 tomas2014m. sausio 15d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

doi:10.3000/19770960.CA2014.011.lit

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 11A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir prane_imai

57 tomas2014m. sausio 15d.

---

| Prane_imo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2014/C 011A/01 | Pranešimo apie konkursą Europos geležinkelio agentūros (ERA, Prancūzija) vykdomojo direktoriaus (AD 14 lygio laikinojo darbuotojo) pareigoms klaidų ištaisymas – COM/2014/10345 (OL C 6 A, 2014 1 10) | 1 |

Prane_imo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2014/C 011A/01

Pranešimo apie konkursą Europos geležinkelio agentūros (ERA, Prancūzija) vykdomojo direktoriaus (AD 14 lygio laikinojo darbuotojo) pareigoms klaidų ištaisymas – COM/2014/10345 (OL C 6 A, 2014 1 10)

(OL C 6 A, 2014 1 10)

1

OFICIALIOJO LEIDINIO C A SERIJOS KONKURSAI APŽVALGA

Toliau pateikiamas šiais metais išleistų C A serijos leidinių sąrašas.

Jei nenurodyta kitaip, Oficialieji leidiniai yra išleisti visomis kalbomis.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |

5

6

11

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 15.1.2014 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 11/1

---

Pranešimo apie konkursą Europos geležinkelio agentūros (ERA, Prancūzija) vykdomojo direktoriaus

(AD 14 lygio laikinojo darbuotojo) pareigoms klaidų ištaisymas

COM/2014/10345

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 6 A, 2014 m. sausio 10 d.
  )

(2014/C 11 A/01)

4 puslapis, „Registracijos procedūra“, trečioje pastraipoje interneto nuoroda turi būti tokia:

„https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/“.

---
#### In the Matter of Frederica Bond, Respondent; Lee Shubebt, Appellant.

Argued April 5, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

*Roland Ford, Ellis*J. *Staley*and *Henry B. Forman*for motion.

*Theodore Kiendl, William Klein, Milton B. Weinberger*and *Adolph Lund*opposed.

Motion denied with ten dollars costs.
#### COULSON v. THE STATE.

Appeal from Collin eounty.

*Libel*— -The conviction was upon an indictment which attempted *128to charge the making* and circulating of a libel. Libel is of that class of cases wherein the indictment must set out the language used in *hatee*verba. In Brownlow vs. State, 7 Humph. 62, the indictment, which was similar upon the point in question, charged that the libel “contained amongst other things, the following false, malicious and libelous matter and things, according to the tenor following, that is to say,” It was held that “this averment professes to set forth the substance and not the words of the libel, and, therefore it is not valid. An indictment for libel should profess to set forth on its face accurate copy of the alleged libel in words and figures. If it does not it will be held insufficient on demurrer or in arrest of judgment. The indictment will not be valid if it professes to set forth the libel according to substance or effect.” Held: That the rule quoted is the rule in this State. In this case the writing appears to have been set forth *hatee verba,*but the averment that the “foregoing is the language and substance and meaning of said false and malicious statements as near as they (grand jurors) can give,” shows that the substance and not the words is attempted to be charged. Motions to quash and in arrest should have been sustained. Writing and mailing of a libelous letter constitutes publication.

Opinion by

Willson, J.
#### Joshua Neil HARRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TARGET; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-15863

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2017 *

Filed July 17, 2017

*699Joshua Neil Harrell, Pro Se

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Joshua Neil Harrell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, *Res-nick v, Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Harrell’s action because Harrell failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. *See Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); *see also Lacey v. Maricopa County,*693 F.3d 896, 918-19 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (setting forth requirements for false arrest and malicious prosecution claims).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Harrell’s third amended complaint without leave to amend because further amendment would have been futile. *See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment would be futile).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

d0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

138799(31)

SANDRA CANTLEY, Personal Representative of the Estate of James Cantley, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138799 COA: 288800 Genesee CC: 07-085696-NO GENESEE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s October 9, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.

C AVANAGH 

### , J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
#### Otto Denecke *v.*The Same. Henry Greenberg *v.*The Same. Emelia Schloss *v.*The Same.

Same as above.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11418-11419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB852]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management Councils 
(Councils) will hold a public meeting of their joint Northeast Trawl 
Advisory Panel (NTAP). See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for agenda 
details.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, March 17, 2022, from 9 
a.m. until 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the calendar prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Councils' Northeast Trawl Advisory Panel 
(NTAP) will review recent developments related to relevant fishery 
surveys and develop future priorities.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.

(Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.)


[[Page 11419]]


    Dated: February 24, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-04280 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### CITY OF DETROIT *v.*MORGAN.

Criminal Law — Ordinance Violation — New Trial — Cross-Examination — Witnesses.

A new trial must be granted to defendant, charged with violating a eity ordinance, where a review of the record shows that she was denied a fair trial because she was denied the right of ■■ cross-examination and an opportunity to produce a witness but does not establish that she was entitled to have the charge against her dismissed.

Reference for Points in Headnote

21 Am Jur 2d, Criminal Law §§ 222, 237, 333, 336.

Appeal from Recorder’s Court of Detroit, Traffic and Ordinance Division, Maher (Richard M.), J.

Submitted Division 1 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.

(Docket No. 3,567.)

Decided June 10,1968.

Mary Morgan was convicted of failure to surrender a dog for rabies observation in violation of an ordinance of tbe City of Detroit. Defendant appeals.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

*Robert Reese,*Corporation Counsel, and *Robert D. McGlear,*Assistant Corporation Counsel, for plaintiff.

*Jane Kerr,*for defendant on appeal.

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals her conviction for violating an ordinance of tbe city of Detroit. *657A review of the record demonstrates that defendant was denied a fair trial because she was denied right of cross-examination and an opportunity to produce a witness, but the record does not establish that defendant is entitled to have the charge against her dismissed as requested by defendant on this appeal.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

                      WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

1. The  undersigned  authorized  officer of LandAmerica  Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's  compliance with
the applicable  servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)
(4) (xi) and 1122(d) (4) (xii) (the  "Regulation  AB  Servicing  Criteria")  for
residential   mortgage  backed  securities  for  which  the  Company  served  as
third-party  property tax payment  provider on the  underlying  collateral  (the
"Platform").  Except  as set  forth in the  preceding  sentence,  the  servicing
criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section  1122(d) are not applicable to the
activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform.

2. The Company  used the  criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section  1122(d) to assess
the compliance with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.

3. Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to
remit tax payments  directly to tax agencies  without  having the Company  remit
those property tax payments through our tax payment  service.  We refer to these
customers  as  "non-outsourced   servicer  customers."  With  respect  to  these
non-outsourced  customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the
servicing  criteria  set forth in 17 CFR Part 229  Section  1122(d)(4)(xi),  the
Company's  assertion  is  strictly  limited to its  processing  of tax  payments
submitted through the Company's tax payment service.

4. With  respect  to  servicing  criteria  set forth in 17 CFR Part 229  Section
1122(d)(4)(xii),  the Company's  assertion is strictly limited to its processing
of property tax penalty  payments.  The Company has determined that its servicer
customers my also have access to systems that enable those  servicers to process
penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment of compliance
does not relate to the actual or  potential  activities  of other  parties  with
access to obligor escrow accounts.

5. Based on such  assessment,  management  believes that, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006, the Company has complied in all material  respects with
the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform.

6. The registered public  accounting firm of Grant Thornton,  LLP, has issued an
attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the Regulation
AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Date: February 20, 2007

LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.


By:   /s/ Bob Ige
Name: Bob Ige
Its:  Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,333,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,378,593
<PP&E>                                         126,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,466,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           373
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,749,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,466,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  814,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (722,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (722,848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (722,848)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SCB COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         365,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,363,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,903,289
<INVENTORY>                                    391,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,251,374
<PP&E>                                      34,927,817
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,823,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,394,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       57,964,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,453
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,914,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,394,684
<SALES>                                     35,945,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,945,623
<CGS>                                       25,708,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,708,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,605,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,042,506
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                979,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                   386,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            592,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   592,673
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the Company) on Form
1O-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pam Schertz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.   /s/ Greg S.
Taylor Greg S.
Taylor Chief Financial
Officer  April 4, 2008
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Stella Wechsler et al., as Executors of Sigmund Wechsler, Deceased. Virginia W. Fields et al., Appellants-Respondents; Irving Trust Company, Respondent-Appellant; Doris W. Freiden, Respondent. (Seven Consolidated Appeals)

Argued May 27,1943;

decided December 8, 1943.

*J. Alvin Van Bergh, Joseph M. Proskauer*and *Charles Loolcer*for Virginia W. Fields, appellant-respondent.

*759
      *Forrest M. Anderson, Raymond M. White*and *Norman B. Murphy*for Irving Trust Company, respondent, and for Gifford, Woody, Carter and Hays, respondents-appellants.

*Helen L. Buttemuieser*for Stella Wechsler, appellant-respondent.

*Richard 8. Wechsler,*in person, and also for Catherine W. Palmer, appellants-respondents.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman,” Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
#### Minnie Manchik, Respondent, *v.*Pinelawn Cemetery, Respondent, et al., Appellant.

Argued November 29, 1943;

decided January 13, 1944.

*817
      *Lewis G. Evans*for appellant.

*G. Elmer Bpedick*and *Arthur L. Reuter*for plaintiff-respondent.

*818Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W ashington 98057 - 3356

December 21 , 2012 Mr. Douglas M. Lane Director, Regulatory

Administration The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 MC 03 - 56 Seattle, WA 98124 - 2207 Dear Mr. Lane: We have received your December 12 , 2012, petition for exemption from the requirements o f Title 14 , Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.901(c), Amendment 25 - 126, and 25 - 981(a)(3) , Amendment 25 - 125 for the Models 7 4 7 - 4 00/ - 4 00 D / - 4 00 F airplane s . The exemption, if granted, would allow the planned changes to the Fuel Quantity Indication Sy stem (FQIS). This request has been given Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 1 324 in the Federal Docket Management S ys tem (FDMS) . We are in the process of reviewing your request and will contact you if we need additional information . A summary

of your petition will be pub lished in the Federal Register for public comment , in accordance with the requirements of § 11.85 . You will be advised of the agency's decision on your petitions as soon as possible. If you have any questions or c oncerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Mike Dostert b y phone at 425 - 227 - 2132 or by e - mail at mike.dostert @faa .gov. Sincerel y,

Theresa White Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service