alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State v. Ullins.

Criminal Case : no arguments : no error found : affirmed.

*Appeal from Polk Circuit Court.*— Hon. Josiah Given, Judge.

Filed, June 9, 1888.

Indictment for a nuisance caused by the defendant selling and keeping for sale intoxicating liquors. He pleaded not guilty. ■ Trial by jury, verdict and judgment. The defendant appeals.

*764No appearance for appellant. ■

*A. J. Baker,*Attorney General, for the State.’

Servers, O. J.

This case was submitted on a transcript, which contains the indictment, plea, instructions, motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and the judgment of the court. No argument has been filed. We have examined the record and reach the conclusion that there is no error in the record, and, therefore, the judgment of the district court must be

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.5 Letter of Intent Amendment

  

 Exhibit 10.5
 

 Amendment to Letter of Intent Between APD Antiquities, Inc. (APD)
 and Northern Adventures LLC (NALLC) dated April 8, 2011
 Date of this Amendment August 5, 2011
 

 Section One
 

 1.
 The number of shares APD will be amended from 8,432,111 up to 12,432,111 as a result of shares which may be issued pursuant conversion on loans up to $400,000.
 

 2.
 Phase II capital will be adjusted down from 10,000,000 shares at $.25 to an intermediate level of funding consisting of the sale of up to 5,000,000 shares between $.10 and $.15 a share.
 

 3.
 As an alternative to the issuance of 3,000,000 shares as a consideration for NA granting leases on the Quartz Creek and Monitor properties, APD agrees to issue up to 33,000,000 shares in exchange for the transfer of all third party mineral leases, assignment of all right, title and interest in certain unpatented mining claims and rights to a total of nine mineral prospects from NALLC to APD.
 

 Section Two
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Three
 

 1.
 The amount of convertible promissory notes can be increased from $200,000 up to $400,000.  The conversion rate remains the same.
 

 Section Four
 

 1.
 All promissory notes from NALLC to APD will be extended to December 31, 2011 and the amount maybe be increased pursuant to an amount agreed upon the NALLC and APD.
 

 Section Five
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Six
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Seven
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Eight
 

 No Amendments
 


 
 

 Section Nine
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Ten
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Eleven
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Twelve
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Thirteen
 

 No Amendments
 

 Section Fourteen
 

 1.
 The period of time shall be extended until December 31, 2011 by mutual written consent of the parties as outline in this Amendment.
 

 Section Fifteen
 

 No Amendments
 

 

 

 Very truly yours,
 

 Agreed and accepted this 5th day of August, 2011. This document can be signed in counter parts.
 

 Place: Spokane, Washington on August 5, 2011
 

 

 _________________________
 Cindy K. Swank, President
 APD Antiquities, Inc.
 

 Place: Osborn, Idaho on August 5, 2011
 

 

 

 _________________________
 Martin Clemet, a Managing Member
 Northern Adventures, LLC
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Authority.



/s/    LEO M.
CHUPASKALeo M. ChupaskaChief Financial Officer,Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityAugust 13, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Central Freight Lines, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
      A. Hale, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Jeffrey A. Hale


Jeffrey
      A. Hale


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      1,
      2006
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6903 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a plan to ensure an adequate 

supply of medications for the military health system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN (for herself and Mr. GALLAGHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a plan to 

ensure an adequate supply of medications for the military 

health system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stockpiling Active 

5 Pharmaceutical Ingredients Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6903 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE 

2 SUPPLY OF MEDICATIONS FOR THE MILI3 TARY HEALTH SYSTEM. 

4 Not later than one year after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop 

6 a plan, regarding the military health system— 

7 (1) for stockpiling essential medications to en8 sure availability of a 180-day supply during armed 

9 conflict or other supply chain disruptions; and 

10 (2) that mitigates vulnerabilities to active phar11 maceutical ingredient supply chains and reduces de12 pendence on active pharmaceutical ingredients from 

13 foreign sources. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Jas. P. Kernochan, Ex’r, Resp’t, *v.*The N. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. *et al.,*App’lts.

See 36 N. Y. State Rep., 1024.

*Davies & Rapallo,*opposed.

Motion to amend return denied, with ten dollars costs.
No. 76-1365.

#### Redmond *v.*Wheeler et al.

Appeal from Ct. App. Ky. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: December 11, 2014 106102 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

NEW YORK,

Respondent, 

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DESARAIE BROWN, 

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 21, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

G. Scott Walling, Schenectady, for appellant.

Derek P. Champagne, District Attorney, Malone (Glenn

MacNeill of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin

County (Main Jr., J.), rendered June 25, 2013, which revoked

defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In 2012, defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to

criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree

and was sentenced to five years of probation. She was

subsequently charged with violating the terms of her probation. 

Defendant pleaded guilty to certain probation violations and

waived her right to appeal. Thereafter, her probation was

revoked and she was sentenced in accordance with the plea

agreement to four years in prison followed by two years of

postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of

representing defendant on the ground that there are no
-2- 106102 

nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon reviewing the

record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is

affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted

(see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d

650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, P.J., Rose, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to

be relieved of assignment granted. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 32.1****   **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****   **

               In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Atrisco Oil & Gas, L.L.C. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Sanchez, Chief Executive Officer of the            registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:             
| (1)    | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |

              Date: April 14, 2009                            

    
|  | By:    | /s/ Peter Sanchez                                        |
|--|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   | Peter Sanchez                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|  |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

   

 

               This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange            Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Frances Armstrong et al., Appellants, against Richard C. Montgomery, Successor to William A. Schubert, as Comptroller of the City of Yonkers, et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 4, 1943;

decided October 14, 1943.

*Richard II. Level*for motion.

*Paul L. Bleakley, Corporation Counsel*(J. *Raymond Hannon*of counsel), opposed.

*666Motion dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the application was not made within the time specified in section 592, subdivision 3, of the Civil Practice Act. *(Pollak*v. *Port Morris Bank,*257 N. Y. 287, 288; *Low*v. *Bankers Trust Co.,*265 N Y. 264, 265; *Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.*v. *Public Nat. Bank & Trust Co.,*262 N. Y. 614.)
#### In the Matter of Reader Mail, Inc., Appellant, against Sol Fishko, as President of Paper Workers & Distributing Trades Union, Local 447 of International Printing Pressmen and Assistants’ Union of North America, A. F. of L., an Unincorporated Association, Respondent.

Submitted November 22, 1943;

decided December 2, 1943.

*Lloyd B. Ranter*and *Oscar A. Lewis*for motion.

*Mildred Both*and *Frank Bcheiner*opposed.

Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 99    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MDU Communications International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Sheldon Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|                                    |  | /s/SHELDON NELSONSheldon Nelson Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial OfficerMDU Communications International, Inc.
|----------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|January 10, 2002
Totowa, New Jersey |  |                                                                                                                          

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10 KSB for theyear ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.This 12th day of April, 2006.     /s/ Monty G. Watson     Monty G. Watson  President and Chief Executive Officer     /s/ Kelly J. Johnson     Kelly J. Johnson  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 35
MKL 03.31.2012 EX 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Description of Awards under Executive Bonus Plan and
Omnibus Incentive Plan for 2012


Markel Corporation (the “Company”) has an incentive compensation program for executive officers that generally consists of two elements-cash incentive compensation paid under the Executive Bonus Plan and restricted stock units issued under the Omnibus Incentive Plan.  All executive officers (Alan I. Kirshner, Anthony F. Markel, Steven A. Markel, Thomas S. Gayner, Richard R. Whitt, III, Gerard Albanese, Jr., Britton L. Glisson, F. Michael Crowley and Anne G. Waleski) participate in the Executive Bonus Plan.  All executive officers, except for Alan I. Kirshner, Anthony F. Markel and Steven A. Markel, participate in the Omnibus Incentive Plan.  
Awards are subject to the achievement of pre-established performance goals and are administered to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Performance goals for 2012 relate to growth in book value and, in the case of Mr. Albanese, also include underwriting combined ratio and revenue growth.  For all executive officers other than Mr. Crowley, the measurement period for the growth in book value goal is five years; for Mr. Crowley, it is four years. 
The Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors sets the amounts payable under each performance award. The employee receives the appropriate payment at the end of the performance period if the performance goals and other terms and conditions of the award are met. Awards under the Executive Bonus Plan are payable in cash and under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, in restricted stock units. Any performance award must be made before the 90th day of the period for which the performance award relates and before the completion of 25% of such period. 
Growth in book value targets are similar to prior years, except that if compound annual growth in book value falls within the 6-10% range, there is a potential payout equal to 40% of base salary.  If performance falls within that range, the Committee is expected to use discretion to determine whether the awards should be reduced. Underwriting-based targets are based on a grid measuring underwriting performance and revenue growth for the business operations for which the executive officer has direct responsibility, modified by the overall corporate combined ratio.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6862 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 655
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6862

                          [Report No. 118-794]

To amend the FAST Act to include certain mineral production activities 
             as a covered project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2023

    Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. Moore of Utah, and Mr. Newhouse) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

                            December 4, 2024

            Additional sponsors: Mr. Moylan and Mr. Donalds

                            December 4, 2024

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                           December 19, 2023]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the FAST Act to include certain mineral production activities 
             as a covered project, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mineral Mining Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF COVERED PROJECT.

    Section 41001(6)(A) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 4370m(6)(A)) is 
amended by inserting ``mineral production,'' before ``or any other 
sector''.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST FINALIZING, IMPLEMENTING, OR ENFORCING THE 
              PROPOSED RULE RELATED TO THE SCOPE OF MINING UNDER THE 
              FAST ACT.

    The Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council may not 
finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule titled ``Revising 
Scope of the Mining Sector of Projects That Are Eligible for Coverage 
Under Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act'' (88 
Fed. Reg. 65350; September 22, 2023).
                                                 Union Calendar No. 655

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6862

                          [Report No. 118-794]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the FAST Act to include certain mineral production activities 
             as a covered project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 4, 2024

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERWIN ALVARADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10622

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02002-JGZBPV-1

District of Arizona, 

Tucson

ORDER

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The parties’ joint motion to affirm the district court without prejudice to

resentencing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on September 14,

2012, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition is filed concurrently

with this order. 

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. 

FILED

DEC 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ERWIN ALVARADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10622

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02002-JGZBPV-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Erwin Alvarado appeals from the 24–month sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. 

FILED

DEC 19 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Alvarado asserted that the district court erred by not sua sponte granting him

a third-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. He argued that the reason

cited by the government for refusing to make the motion for the reduction, that he

reserved his right to appeal, was an impermissible reason under U.S.S.G. 

§ 3E1.1(b). 

Effective November 1, 2013, U.S.S.G § 3E1.1 was amended to clarify that

“[t]he government should not withhold [a motion for a third-level reduction for

acceptance of responsibility] based on interests not identified in § 3E1.1, such as

whether the defendant agrees to waive his or her right to appeal.” U.S.S.G §

3E1.1, cmt. n.6. The parties have filed a joint motion indicating that resentencing

is warranted in light of this amendment, but requesting nevertheless that the

sentence be affirmed without prejudice because Alvarado has been released and

removed from the United States. Accordingly, because Alvarado has been

removed from the United States, we affirm the sentence imposed by the district

court, but do so without prejudice to a later request by Alvarado for a resentencing

if he returns to the United States. See United States v. Aguilar-Reyes, 723 F.3d

1014, 1017-18 (9th Cir. 2013).

AFFIRMED without prejudice and with instructions.

2