59468 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed CFM Service Bulletin 

(SB) No. CFM56–7B S/B 73–0203, dated 

June 9, 2014, and CFM SB No. CFM56– 

7B S/B 73–0204, dated June 9, 2014. 

The SBs describe procedures for the 

introduction of new FADEC software for 

the EECs. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

modification of the engine by removing 

FADEC software, version 7BV4 or 

earlier, installed in the EECs on CFM56– 

7B engines. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

would affect about 2,921 engines 

installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 1 hour per product to comply 

with this proposed AD. The average 

labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on 

these figures, we estimate the cost of the 

proposed AD on U.S. operators to be 

$248,285. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 39.13 by adding the 

following new airworthiness directive 

(AD): 

CFM International S.A.: Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0521; Directorate Identifier 2014– 

NE–11–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by December 1, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all CFM International 

(CFM) S.A. CFM56–7B series turbofan 

engines. 

(d) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a dual engine 

thrust instability event that resulted in the 

overspeed and in-flight shutdown (IFSD) of 

one engine. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

a thrust instability event, which could lead 

to overspeed and IFSD of one or more 

engines, loss of thrust control, damage to the 

engine, and damage to the airplane. 

(e) Compliance 

(1) Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(2) Within 6 months after the effective date 

of this AD, modify the engine by removing 

full authority digital engine control (FADEC) 

software, version 7BV4 or earlier, installed in 

the electronic engine controls. 

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. 

(g) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Barbara Caufield, Aerospace 

Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, 

Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New 

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 

01803; phone: 781–238–7751; fax: 781–238– 

7199; email: barbara.caufield@faa.gov. 

(2) CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56– 

7B S/B 73–0203, dated June 9, 2014, and 

CFM No. SB CFM56–7B S/B 73–0204, dated 

June 9, 2014, which are not incorporated by 

reference in this proposed AD, can be 

obtained from CFM using the contact 

information in paragraph (g)(3) of this 

proposed AD. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact CFM International 

Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann 

Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; 

phone: 877–432–3272; fax: 877–432–3329; 

email: geae.aoc@ge.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 

12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 

MA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

September 25, 2014. 

Ann C. Mollica, 

Acting Directorate Manager, Engine & 

Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–23563 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0656; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–224–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; rescission. 

SUMMARY: We propose to rescind 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–08– 

08, which applies to certain Airbus 

Model A330–243, –341, –342, and –343 

airplanes. AD 2010–08–08 requires 

deactivating the water scavenge 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 59469 

automatic operation and revising the 

Limitations section of the airplane flight 

manual (AFM). We also propose to 

rescind AD 2011–06–04, which applies 

to certain Model A330–243F airplanes. 

AD 2011–06–04 requires revising the 

Limitations section of the AFM. We 

issued ADs 2010–08–08 and 2011–06– 

04 to prevent fuel flow restriction, 

caused by ice, resulting in a possible 

engine surge or stall condition, and the 

engine being unable to provide the 

commanded thrust. Since we issued 

ADs 2010–08–08 and 2011–06–04, we 

have determined that the water 

scavenge system (WSS) operation does 

not induce any risk of fuel feed system 

(including the engine) blockage by ice 

on the pipework or pump inlets. We 

have also determined that the risk of 

fuel flow restriction by ice at the fuel oil 

heat exchanger (FOHE) interface on 

airplanes equipped with Trent 700 

engines is now addressed by a redesigned FOHE, which incorporates 

enhanced anti-icing and de-icing 

performance. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by November 17, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, 

Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond 

Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac 

Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 

96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email 

airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; 

Internet http://www.airbus.com. You 

may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0656; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1138; 

fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0656; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–224–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On April 1, 2010, we issued AD 2010– 

08–08, Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 

19196, April 14, 2010), for Airbus 

Model A330–243, –341, –342, and –343 

airplanes equipped with Rolls-Royce 

Trent 700 engines, on which Airbus 

Modification 56966MP16199 has been 

embodied in production or Airbus 

Service Bulletin A330–28–3105 has 

been embodied in service. AD 2010–08– 

08 requires deactivating the water 

scavenge automatic operation and 

revising the Limitations section of the 

AFM. AD 2010–08–08 resulted from 

reports of ice being shed, causing a 

temporary blockage in the engine fuel 

system. We issued AD 2010–08–08 to 

prevent fuel flow restriction caused by 

ice, resulting in a possible engine surge 

or stall condition, and the engine being 

unable to provide the commanded 

thrust. 

On February 28, 2011, we issued AD 

2011–06–04, Amendment 39–16628 (76 

FR 13075, March 10, 2011), for Airbus 

Model A330–243F airplanes, on which 

Airbus Modification 56966H16199 has 

been embodied in production or Airbus 

Service Bulletin A330–28–3105 has 

been embodied in service. AD 2011–06– 

04 requires revising the Limitations 

section of the AFM. AD 2011–06–04 

resulted from reports of ice being shed, 

causing a temporary blockage in the 

engine fuel system. We issued AD 2011– 

06–04 to prevent fuel flow restriction 

caused by ice, resulting in a possible 

engine surge or stall condition, and the 

engine being unable to provide the 

commanded thrust. 

Actions Since ADs 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, 

April 14, 2010), and 2011–06–04, 

Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 13075, 

March 10, 2011), Were Issued 

Since we issued ADs 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, 

April 14, 2010), and 2011–06–04, 

Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 13075, 

March 10, 2011), we have determined 

that the WSS operation does not induce 

any risk of fuel feed system (including 

the engine) blockage by ice on the 

pipework or pump inlets. 

We have also determined that the risk 

of fuel flow restriction by ice at the 

FOHE interface on airplanes equipped 

with Trent 700 engines is now 

addressed by a re-designed FOHE 

(Airbus Modification 200218), which 

incorporates enhanced anti-icing and 

de-icing performance. The re-designed 

FOHE was required to be installed on all 

Trent 700 engines by FAA AD 2010–07– 

01, Amendment 39–16244 (75 FR 

15326, March 29, 2010). 

EASA has issued Airworthiness 

Directive 2010–0132–CN, dated October 

14, 2013 (referred to after this as the 

Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness 

Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to cancel 

EASA AD 2010–0132R1, dated June 10, 

2013, which superseded EASA AD 

2010–0132, dated June 28, 2010. The 

requirements of FAA AD 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, 

April 14, 2010), and AD 2011–06–04, 

Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 13075, 

March 10, 2011), correspond to EASA 

AD 2010–0132. The MCAI states: 

During an in-service event, the flight crew 

of a Trent 700 powered A330 aeroplane 

reported a temporary Engine Pressure Ratio 

(EPR) shortfall on engine 2 during the takeoff phase of the flight. The ENG STALL 

warning was set. The flight crew followed the 

standard procedures which included 

reducing throttle to idle. The engine 

recovered and provided the demanded thrust 

level for the remainder of the flight. 

Data analysis confirmed a temporary fuel 

flow restriction and subsequent recovery, and 

indicated that also engine 1 experienced a 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
59470 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

temporary fuel flow restriction shortly after 

the initial event on engine 2, again followed 

by a full recovery. The engine 1 EPR shortfall 

was insufficient to trigger any associated 

warning and was only noted through analysis 

of the flight data. No flight crew action was 

necessary to recover normal performance on 

this engine. The remainder of the flight was 

uneventful. 

Based on industry-wide experience, the 

investigation of the event focused on the 

possibility for ice to temporarily restrict the 

fuel flow. While no direct fuel system fault 

was identified, the operation of the water 

scavenge system (WSS) at Rib 3 was 

considered to have been a contributory 

factor. 

Prompted by these findings, EASA issued 

Emergency AD 2010–0042–E [which 

corresponds to FAA AD 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, April 

14, 2010] to require deactivation of the 

automatic Standby Fuel Pump Scavenge 

System and to prohibit dispatch of an 

aeroplane with one main fuel pump 

inoperative. 

Subsequently, EASA issued AD 2010–0132 

which superseded EASA AD 2010–0042–E, 

retaining its requirements, to expand the 

applicability to the newly certified model 

A330–243F [which corresponds to FAA AD 

2011–06–04, Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 

13075, March 10, 2011, for the A330–243F 

requirements]. EASA AD 2010–0132 was 

later revised to remove the dispatch 

restriction with one main fuel pump 

inoperative. 

Since EASA AD 2010–0132R1 was issued, 

extensive fuel system icing risk 

investigations testing was conducted by 

Airbus and Rolls-Royce, the results of which 

confirmed that the Rib 3 WSS operation does 

not induce any risk of fuel feed system 

(including the engine) blockage by ice 

accreted on the pipework and/or pump 

inlets. In addition, it was demonstrated that 

the risk of fuel flow restriction by ice at the 

Fuel Oil Heat Exchanger (FOHE) interface on 

aeroplanes equipped with Trent 700 engines 

is now adequately addressed by introduction 

of a re-designed FOHE, more tolerant to the 

release of ice (modification 200218). The 

modified FOHE (incorporating enhanced 

anti-icing and de-icing performance) is 

required to be installed on all Trent 700 

engines through EASA AD 2009–0257 [which 

corresponds to FAA AD 2010–07–01, 

Amendment 39–16244 (75 FR 15326, March 

29, 2010)]. 

Previously, the operation of the WSS at Rib 

3 was no longer considered as a main 

contributory factor on ice build-up and 

subsequent release of ice into the fuel system. 

Based on the latest information, the 

deactivation of the automatic Standby Fuel 

Pump Scavenge System is no longer required. 

For the reasons described above, this 

Notice cancels EASA AD 2010–0132R1. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0656. 

FAA’s Conclusions 

Upon further consideration, we have 

determined that ADs 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, 

April 14, 2010), and 2011–06–04, 

Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 13075, 

March 10, 2011), must be rescinded. 

Rescission of ADs 2010–08–08 and 

2011–06–04 would not preclude the 

FAA from issuing another related action 

nor commit the FAA to any course of 

action in the future. 

Related Costs of Compliance 

AD 2010–08–08, Amendment 39– 

16263 (75 FR 19196, April 14, 2010), 

affects about 13 airplanes of U.S. 

registry. The estimated cost of the 

actions required by AD 2010–08–08 for 

U.S. operators is $1,105, or $85 per 

product. Rescinding AD 2010–08–08 

would eliminate those costs. 

AD 2011–06–04, Amendment 39– 

16628 (76 FR 13075, March 10, 2011), 

affects no airplanes of U.S. registry. For 

U.S. operators, there are no costs 

associated with the actions required by 

AD 2011–06–04. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This proposed 

regulation is within the scope of that 

authority because it addresses an unsafe 

condition that is likely to exist or 

develop on products identified in this 

rulemaking action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979); 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska; and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directives (AD) 

2010–08–08, Amendment 39–16263 (75 

FR 19196, April 14, 2010); and 2011– 

06–04, Amendment 39–16628 (76 FR 

13075, March 10, 2011); and adding the 

following new AD: 

Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2014–0656; 

Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–224–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by November 

17, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This action removes ADs 2010–08–08, 

Amendment 39–16263 (75 FR 19196, April 

14, 2010); and 2011–06–04, Amendment 39– 

16628 (76 FR 13075, March 10, 2011). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to the airplanes specified 

in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. 

(1) Airbus Model A330–243, –341, –342, 

and –343 airplanes, certificated in any 

category, all manufacturer serial numbers 

equipped with Rolls-Royce Trent 700 

engines, on which Airbus Modification 

56966MP16199 has been embodied in 

production or Airbus Service Bulletin A330– 

28–3105 has been embodied in service. 

(2) Airbus Model A330–243F airplanes, 

certificated in any category, all manufacturer 

serial numbers on which Airbus Modification 

56966H16199 has been embodied in 

production or Airbus Service Bulletin A330– 

28–3105 has been embodied in service. 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 59471 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 24, 2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–23472 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0460; FRL–9915–36– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Imperial County 

Air Pollution Control District and San 

Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Imperial County Air 

Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) and 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) 

portions of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern definitions that are 

necessary for the creation, modification 

and understanding of rules that address 

air pollution. Among other changes, the 

revised definitions help clarify federal 

New Source Review (NSR) 

requirements, update the districts’ 

exempt volatile organic compounds list 

to correspond with EPA’s, and improve 

formatting consistency. We are 

proposing to approve local rules which 

include these definitions under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by November 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2014–0460, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: ICAPCD Rule 101 and SJVUAPCD 

Rule 1020. In the Rules and Regulations 

section of this Federal Register, we are 

approving these local rules in a direct 

final action without prior proposal 

because we believe these SIP revisions 

are not controversial. If we receive 

adverse comments, however, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: July 25, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2014–23401 Filed 10–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 271 and 272 

[EPA–R06–RCRA–2012–0793; FRL–9916– 

01–Region 6] 

Arkansas: Final Authorization of StateInitiated Changes and Incorporation by 

Reference of State Hazardous Waste 

Management Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: During a review of Arkansas’ 

regulations, the Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) identified a 

variety of State-initiated changes to 

Arkansas’ hazardous waste program 

under the Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), for 

which the State had not previously 

sought authorization. The EPA proposes 

to authorize the State for the program 

changes. In addition, the EPA proposes 

to codify in the regulations entitled 

‘‘Approved State Hazardous Waste 

Management Programs’’, Arkansas’ 

authorized hazardous waste program. 

The EPA will incorporate by reference 

into the Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR) those provisions of the State 

regulations that are authorized and that 

the EPA will enforce under RCRA. 

DATES: Send written comments by 

November 3, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 

Authorization Coordinator, or Julia 

Banks, Codification Coordinator, State/

Tribal Oversight Section (6PD–O), 

Multimedia Planning and Permitting 

Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Phone number: (214) 665–8533 or (214) 

665–8178. You may also submit 

comments electronically or through 

hand delivery/courier; please follow the 

detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES

section of the direct final rule which is 

located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alima Patterson, (214) 665–8533. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this 

Federal Register, the EPA is authorizing 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES