alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Solomon Nordine, Chief Financial Officer of Border
Management, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Border Management, Inc. for the
twelve month period ended December 31, 2008 (the 'Report') fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Border
Management, Inc.

Dated: March 26, 2009

/s/ Solomon Nordine
------------------
Solomon Nordine
Chief Financial Officer,
Border Management, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Border Management,
Inc. and will be retained by Border Management, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John C. Rochester, Appellant, *v.*Hugh G. Bergen et al., Respondents.

Argued June 14, 1943;

decided October 14, 1943.

*657' *Henry Vollmer, Jr.,*and *John C. Osborne*for appellant.

*Lloyd P. Stryker, Howard A. Rochford*and *Harold W. Wolf- , ram*for respondents. 1

*Per Curiam.*

Paragraph 3 of the agreement is invalid. Paragraph 2 is inseparable from paragraph 3 and falls with it. There has been no refusal or failure to perform any other provision of the agreement. The judgment appealed from denying specific performance and dismissing the complaint is therefore affirmed, with costs.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2006-S11 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   National City Mortgage Co. and U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### GAMMAGE v. POWELL.

Appeal from -Nolan county.

The land in controversy is in Nolan county. Powell settled on it December 20, 1880, and applied for it as a homestead donation October 28,1881. On April 11,1881, Gammage located the unlocated balance of a headright certificate on a tract of land embracing the 160 acres in dispute, and the tract was. patented under that location October 18, 1881. Gammage contends that the land was not. within thirty days prior to the time Powell made his application, public unappropriated domain, and therefore his application was ineffective. Powell contends and so alleges, that the location and patent of appellant was void, because at the time of the location and patent the land was in Nolan county, and withdrawn from appropriation by location of land certificates by the Act of July 14, 1879. (General Laws, page 48.) Held: Article 3940, Revised Statutes, intended to protect land from location, for the period named after the occupancy or settlement began, for the benefit of persons seeking a homestead donation. Where the application was made and filed, the survey made within twelve months after the application was made, and being recorded in the Surveyor’s Office, with the *125application for the land, was sent to the General Land Office about October 20,1882, Held: These facts fixed appellee’s rights, if the land had not been legally appropriated by another. Construing tks*r act .Inly 14, 1879, (General Laws, p. 48) in connection with the amendatory act of March 11, 1881, (General Laws, p. 20.) the court holds that Gansmage’s location patent is void, because ors land not subject to appropriation by land certificates except- as the same umy be permitted under the homestead pre-emption laws; but as-Powell was plaintiff, it devolved on Mm to prove his right to the land, which he fails to do. Reversed and remanded.

Opinion by

Stay ton, J.
Exhibit 99.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Toys “R” Us, Inc. (the “**Company**”) for the period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, John H. Eyler, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of the knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the       Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,       the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ John H. Eyler, Jr._______ |
|-------------------------------|
| Name:               | John H. Eyler, Jr. |
| Title:                        | Chairman of the Board, |
|                               | President and |
|                               | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:               | June 16, 2003 |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Toys “R” Us, Inc. and will be retained by Toys “R” Us, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Yuriy Semenov, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DanaPC.com;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: October 15, 2007



/s/ Yuriy Semenov

Yuriy Semenov

Chief Executive and Financial Officer
FAA MCAI AD \VORKSHEET (CONTINUED) 

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

:\'ational Business Aircraft A:-.~m~ at on Eli Cotti 12/19/14 

Regiona l Airline Association 12119114 

,\inTaft Onm~rs & Pilots Association l{obert Hackman 12119114 

-\irlincs for America Robert ln·land 12/19/14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             654
<SECURITIES>                                     1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                      3,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,770
<PP&E>                                           1,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,353
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,321
<SALES>                                          3,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,000
<CGS>                                            1,723
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (677)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (677)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
September 4, 2012 

BY FACSIMILE 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office 

des transports 

du Canada 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

X40, suite 6402 

400 7th Street S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

Reference: OST 2006-24269 

Canadian 

Transportation 

Agency 

M4820-U5-19 

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United 

States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters 

between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport 

Agreement between Canada and the United States of America, signed March 12, 2007 

(Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the 

Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

---

Manager International Agreements, 

cc Robert Ready, ANA 

Marc Rioux, ACEA. 

Brian Hedberg, US DoT 

Ottawa (Ontario) K1 A ON9 

www.otc.gc.ca 

Ottawa Ontario K1 A ON9 

www.cta.gc.ca 

Canada
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRY EUGENE SHIELDS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# EUR-Lex - 32001R0718 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001R0718

**Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2001 of 10 April 2001 adapting Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards the Combined Nomenclature codes for areca (or betel) and cola nuts **

*
Official Journal L 100 , 11/04/2001 P. 0012 - 0012 *

Commission Regulation (EC) No 718/2001

of 10 April 2001

adapting Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards the Combined Nomenclature codes for areca (or betel) and cola nuts

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/79 of 5 February 1979 on the procedure for adjusting the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature used for agricultural products(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94(2), and in particular Article 2(1) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2388/2000 of 13 October 2000 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff(3) amends the Combined Nomenclature, in particular as regards areca (or betel) and cola nuts.

(2) The table in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables(4), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000(5), should therefore be adapted.

(3) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fruit and Vegetables,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the table in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96, ">TABLE>"

is replaced by: ">TABLE>".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2001.

For the Commission

Franz Fischler

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 34, 9.2.1979, p. 2.

(2) OJ L 349, 31.12.1994, p. 105.

(3) OJ L 264, 18.10.2000, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1.

(5) OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6975 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 West Pike Street 

in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the ‘‘Irene M. Keeley United States 

Courthouse’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2024 

Mr. MOONEY (for himself and Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 

West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Virginia, as the 

‘‘Irene M. Keeley United States Courthouse’’, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 located at 500 West Pike Street in Clarksburg, West Vir7 ginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Irene M. 

8 Keeley United States Courthouse’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6975 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Irene 

5 M. Keeley United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
21S T SENATORIA L DISTRIC T

MAR Y J O WHIT E SENAT E BO X 20302 t T H E STAT E CAPITO L HARMISBUlia , P

A I7l20-30a t (717 ) 7a7-»68 4 TT Y (SCO ) 3«s-i8a i FAX : (717 ) 7S7-60a 8 EMAIL : mwhit«@passn.go v WEBSITE : sanatormjwhite.co m 

# <P^ils ^

Jul y 23,201 0 COMMITTEE S
ENVIRONMENTA L RESOURCE S B r ENEROV , CHAIRMA N APPROPRIATION S EDUCATIO N CONSUME R PROTECTIO N a t PROFESSIONA L LICENSUR E JUDICIAR Y ENVIRONMENTA L QUALIT Y BOAR D JOIN T CONSERVATIO N COMMITTE E PENNSYLVANI A COMMISSIO N O N SENTENCIN G WIL D RESOURC E CONSERVATIO N FUN D
Mr
. Denni s J
. DeVane y Chief , Essential Servic e Distric t X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analytic s U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr
. DeVaney : I a mwritin g regardin g th e Essential Ai r Servic e (EAS ) contrac t

fo r th e Oi l Regio n a

t Venang o Regional Airport in Franklin , PA
. I suppor t Gulfstrea mInternationa l Airlines ' proposa l t o continu e t o provid e 1 8 roun dtri p flight s per week t o Clevelan dHopkin s International Airport for a n annua l subsid y o f

$915,101

. Bot h th e Venang o Count

y Commissioner s an dth e Venang o Are aChambe r o f Commerc e ar e supportin g GulfstreamInternational' s proposal an dar e committe dt o workin g wit h th e Airport an dGulfstreamthroug h th e Sav e ou r Servic e effor

t t o improv e passenge r

enplanement s s o tha t th e cos t per passenge r

doe s no t excee dth e $20 0 cap . I as k for you r favorabl e consideratio n o f Gulfstream' s proposal whic h i s th e ai r servic e preferre db y are aresidents
. Sincerely ,

MARYO O WHITE SENATOR , 21S T DISTRIC T
cc : Venang o Count

y Commissioner s Venang o Are aChambe r

o f Commerc e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              55
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                       757
<INVENTORY>                                      1,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,555
<PP&E>                                           3,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,524)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,468
<SALES>                                          2,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,924
<CGS>                                            2,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIX75HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105•3901NOV242009MichaelVillegas,AirPollutionControlOfficerVenturaCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict669CountySquareDriveVentura,CA93003-5417DearMr.Villegas:Thankyouforsubmittingthe2009AnnualMonitoringNetworkPlanfortheVenturaCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict.Wehavereviewedthesubmitteddocumentandhavefoundthatitiscomplete,informative,verydetailedandmeetsalloftherequirementsforannualnetworkplansasrequiredbyourregulationssetforthunder40CFRPart58.10.Whilethisletterservesasofficialapprovaloftheannualnetworkplan,itdoesnotconstituteapprovalofthesystemmodificationsthatareproposedintheplanforthefuture.Wewillcontinuetoworkwithyourdistricttoreviewsystemchangesastheyproceed.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisletterortheenclosedcomment,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeat(415)947-4226orGwenYoshimuraat(415)947-4134.Sinèr1’,,i€isephLapka,ActingManagerAirDivisionAirQualityAnalysisOfficecc:KeithDuval,VCAPCDKarenMagliano,ARBGwenYoshimura,EPARegion9PrintedonRecycledPaperEPACommentonVenturaCounty’s2009AirMonitoringNetworkPlan1.SystemModification:Accordingtothenetworkplan,VenturaproposesdiscontinuingPM1OmonitoringatElRio.Itisunclearwhetherthismonitormeetsthe40CFR58.14(c)criteriafordiscontinuation.PleasecoordinatewithEPARegion9onthepossiblediscontinuationoftheElRiomonitor,andonotherfuturemodifications.Anymonitordiscontinuationrequestsshouldaddresscriteriaspecifiedin40CFR58.14(c).