alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for
the period ended June 30, 2009 of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.,
(the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Kenneth J. Mahon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









August 10,
2009


Date









By:  /s/ KENNETH J.
MAHON


Kenneth J. Mahon


First Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
#### County of Nassau, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin Davis et al., Defendants, and Helen Jaschek, Appellant.

Submitted October 19, 1943;

decided December 2, 1943.

*737
      *Nathaniel Taylor*for appellant.

*Eugene B. Hurley*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed without costs on the ground that the order does not finally determine the special proceeding within the meaning of the constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
a50282463ex10-2a.htm


Exhibit 10.2a


 







HOT TOPIC, INC.


18305 East San Jose Ave.


City of Industry, California 91748


 


March 16, 2012


 







 


Jim McGinty


18305 East San Jose Ave.


City of Industry, CA 91748







Re:   Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement







Dear Jim:







This second amendment (this “Second Amendment”) to your Amended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Hot Topic, Inc. (the “Company”), dated November 24, 2008, as first amended as of March 21, 2011, amends the terms and conditions of the Agreement to the extent provided herein.  From and after the execution of this Second Amendment by the parties hereto, this Second Amendment shall form a part of the Agreement for all purposes and any reference to the Agreement shall be deemed a reference to the Agreement as amended hereby.  Except as specifically amended as set forth herein, each term and condition of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.







1.           SECTION 6. The references to “twelve (12) months” in Section 6 of the Agreement are hereby replaced with “six (6) months.”







2.           GOVERNING LAW. This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of California.







If the above terms are acceptable to you, please sign this Second Amendment and return it to the Company at your earliest convenience.







Sincerely,












/s/ Lisa Harper


Lisa Harper


CEO







Accepted and Agreed:












/s/ Jim McGinty


Jim McGinty
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable George n. cox 

state Health orrhw 

Auetln, Texae 

mir will aakfmfledge ‘rsoe%it or your letter 0r 

June 81, 19 1443, regarding thq constitutionality or House 

Bill 825, e gsnera@ogd-i, drugs and aosti?tlcs eat introduced but not mydtsqfat ehy Regular EMsion of the 46th 

Leglsle turo . \ ‘,, ‘\ \ ‘>. . . . 

./ 

\ 

With nn&a&r: the &ur& here been Tory liberal 

.in oonrtru$rigvmaotnh~ts Qsq%&md to proteot the publio 

health u&m the eta& .polSjr pliirer. Xx parts Vaughan, 

93 Cd&’ m J&3, 240 S1~ W .,,6?3; Cozlns ~8’. state, 09 

Crlm.,4to 

boar& 

4’ 92; 28!W3. w. X%B. 

o f health-~ ar& ,_seldofi held unwarrented. 

Dslegatlons or authority to 

See 12 R. 0. 

I,. 1206. 

In the -*i&d or rood end drug lrgialation, uhllr 

eneatmnte or the state must not aonrliat with superior federal legislation, a broad lattitude is allowed the stats in 

proteoting its altizena from adulterated, impure or miabranded arti.ales In raopact to purely lntraetate transaotions if 

the enaetnwnt does not burden or interfere with interstate 

eomerce. Royal Baking Powder compeny vs. Enrerson (C.C .A. 

xck..l020) 270 Fed. 429, appeal dlaniased (1922), 43 Sup. 
Honorable George w. COX, Page 2 

Ct. 166, 200 U.S. 762, 67 L. Ed. 96; MoDermott vs. State 

or Wisoonsin (1913) 288 u. s. 156, 33 sup. ct. 431, 57 L. 

Ed. 754, Ann. Cas, 1915a, 39, 47 L.R.A. (N.S.) 984. In 

the case or H.B. 226 a studlous erfort seems to have bern 

made to avoid aontllot with the Bsderal Food and Drugs Act, 

62 Stat. 1040, 21 U.S.C.A. Seas. 301-302. 

Consequently, It is our opinion, and you are respeotrully advised that so far as we oan asoertain rrom a 

oarerul study of H. B. 225 without haring an opportunity to 

consider its relation to the multitude of diverse fact situatlons whlah might arise In its application, the bill does 

not offend the State or Federal Constitutions insofar aa it 

arreots Intrastate transactions. 

Yours vdry truly 

ATTORNEY CENERAL OF TE$AS 

BY 

Asafstant
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7542

TERRY LEE ROSEBORO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cv-0389) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 28, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Terry Lee Roseboro, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. See Roseboro v. United States , No. 5:04- cv-0389 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 2005; Sept. 15, 2005). Accordingly, we grant Roseboro’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the ground that Roseboro’s petition is properly characterized as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sanitized Consolidated Chemical Substance 2: Manufacture of 

Pre-Impregnated Substrates
#### MORRILL vs. STELL, Administrator, etc.

Appeal from Lamar county.

*Contract*— Evidence.—The one question involved in the controversy was whether or not the letters of Stell and Morgan to the ap*55pellant, which were read in evidence, together with the other evidence on the trial, constituted a contract in writing for the sale of the land. That question turns upon whether or not the appellant accepted the appellee’s proposition to convey him the land in the event the appellant should succeed in reversing the judgment in a certain case then on appeal. The finding of the judge was that there was no such acceptance on the part of the appellant. It was purely a question of fact, and having ample evidence to support it," the finding of the court, sitting without a jury, is as conclusive as a verdict in such eases.

Affirmed on the report of

Walker, Presiding Commissioner.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |     |                        
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|Date:  February 13, 2009 |     |                        
|                         |     |                        
|                         | By: | /s/ ALLEN E. KAHN      
|                         |     | Allen E. Kahn          
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer
|                         |     |                        



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Tween Brands, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended February 2, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth T. Stevens, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Dated: March 28, 2008              /s/ Kenneth T. Stevens   Kenneth T. Stevens   President and Chief OperatingOfficer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)



The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ WILLIAM J. VELARDOWilliam J. VelardoPresident and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 11, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6851 

To prohibit certain funding to sanctuary jurisdictions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2023 

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain funding to sanctuary jurisdictions, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperation with ICE 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SANCTUARY CITY RECEIPT OF 

7 SSP FUNDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Federal 

9 Emergency Management Agency shall revise the eligibility 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6851 IH

1 requirements for the Shelter and Services Program (SSP) 

2 of the Agency (or any related successor program) to 

3 render a sanctuary jurisdiction ineligible to receive Fed4 eral funding under such program. 

5 (b) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN OFFI6 CERS AND EMPLOYEES WHO COMPLY WITH LAWFUL RE7 QUESTS MADE BY DHS.—An officer or employee of a 

8 sanctuary jurisdiction may not be held liable under Fed9 eral, State, or local law, for— 

10 (1) sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchang11 ing with any Federal, State, or local government en12 tity information regarding the citizenship or immi13 gration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; 

14 or 

15 (2) complying with a request lawfully made by 

16 the Department of Homeland Security under section 

17 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

18 (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer 

19 for, or notify about the release of, an individual. 

20 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

21 term ‘‘sanctuary jurisdiction’’ means any State or political 

22 subdivision of a State that has in effect a statute, ordi23 nance, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts any 

24 government entity or official from— 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6851 IH

1 (1) sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchang2 ing with any Federal, State, or local government en3 tity information regarding the citizenship or immi4 gration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; 

5 or 

6 (2) complying with a request lawfully made by 

7 the Department of Homeland Security under section 

8 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer 

10 for, or notify about the release of, an individual. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### W. A. ROBERSON vs. A. C. ROBERSON.

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS,

AUSTIN TERM, 1884.

*Divorce*— Evidence.—See tlie opinion for evidence in a suit for divorce brought by the husband against thewjft^heldjnsuflieient to authorize a decree, inasmuch as it does not show that the abandonment charged was not caused by, procured by ~or consented to by him._ _'

Appeal from Brown county.

*G-.I.*Goodrich, for the appellant.

STATEMENT.

This suit was brought by appellant against appellee, March 1st, 1881.

He alleged that he and defendant, Amanda C. Roberson, were married in Keutucky in 1844; that they lived together in that state until the year 1868, when she “wilfully, voluntarily, and without any cause or provocation abandoned his bed and board,” and had never returned. He also avers that she left him with the intention of perpetual abandonment.

A general denial was filed by defendant March 27th, 1882. On same day trial was had by the court without a jury and judgment rendered for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

On the trial plaintiff introduced John H. Roberson the only witness. He testified that plaintiff and defendant were married in Kentucky thirty years ago, and lived together until 1869, when defendautleft and went to Memphis, Tenn., where she remained until 1872, when she went to the house of witness in the state of Missouri, where she remained a short time. She then went to California where she has been ever since.

Witness states that plaintiff had a comfortable home, and he does not know why defendant left plaintiff. Plaintiff had resided in Brown county several years before the filing of the suit. This is all the evidence.

Plaintiff assigns as error the judgment of the court.

*23OPINION.

In our opinion there is no error in the judgment of the court below. Every fact attested by the witness in this case might be true, and yet the defendant might have been driven from her home by the plaintiff, or at least, she might have left it with his consent.

In accordance with the rule announced in *McGown*vs. *McGown,*(52 Tex. 567,) the plaintiff should have produced at least some reasonable measure of proof, that he “neither caused, nor procured, nor consented to the separation.”

The plaintiff’s evidence falls far short of this. The judgment should be affirmed.

Report of commissioners Of appeals adopted and the judgment affirmed.

Opinion by

Delaney, Commissioner,

adopted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6475
In Re: CALVIN ROBINSON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-4777) Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: October 10, 2003 Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Calvin Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly de layed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has recently taken substantial action in Robinson’s case. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant Robinson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Head, revenue-commissioner, *v.*Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital *et al.*

*No.*13173.

May 23, 1940.

*Broadus■ B. Z.ellars, assistant attorney-general, Bryan, Middlebroolcs ■& Garter,*and *N. T. Anderson Jr.,*for plaintiff.

*Spalding, Sibley, Troutman é Broch,*for defendants.

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The exception is to a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition of Grady Head as State revenue-commissioner for intervention in the case of *Taylor*v. *Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital,*ante, 349. The object of the intervention was to collect an inheritance tax alleged to be due to the State of Georgia by the plaintiff Taylor as heir at law, and certain ad valorem taxes alleged to be due to the State on the property devised by will to the. Trustees of Jesse Parker Williams Hospital. There were no assets or funds in the custody of the court for distribution to creditors | or others. *Held:*

.1. While the main suit was in equity, the prayers being for injunction and for establishing title of the' plaintiff to the property involved, and for an accounting, these were matters purely of personal concern as between the parties to the suit, in which the State did not have any special interest. In such circumstances there is no authority of law for the State to intervene.-. See generally on this subject, Code, §§ 37-1006; 55-304; 55-312; 24-211; Krippendorf *v.*Hyde, 110 U. S. 276 (4 Sup. Ct. 27, 28 L. ed. 145) ; 11 Enc. Pl. & Pr., 498 (b), note 2.

2. The judge did not err in dismissing the petition for intervention, on general demurrer. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6810 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 518 North Ridgewood Drive in Sebring, Florida, as the ‘‘U.S. Army Air Corps Major Thomas B. 

McGuire Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6810 EH

1 SECTION 1. U.S. ARMY AIR CORPS MAJOR THOMAS B. 

2 MCGUIRE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 518 North Ridgewood Drive in 

5 Sebring, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘U.S. Army Air Corps Major Thomas B. McGuire Post 

7 Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘U.S. Army Air Corps 

12 Major Thomas B. McGuire Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6810 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. Corps Major Thomas B. McGuire Post Office in Sebring, Florida, as the ‘‘U.S. Army Air al Service located at 518 North Ridgewood Drive
#### In the Matter of Jacob Rud, Appellant. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent.

Argued February 24, 1943;

decided April 8, 1943.

*705
      *John F. X. Finn, I. Maurice Wormser*and *Israel Hoffman*for appellant.

*Einar Chrystie*for respondent.

Order affirmed, no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lotjghban, Finch, Rippet, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
#### VIRAJ PROFILES LIMITED, Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee Valbruna Slater Stainless, Inc., Valbruna Stainless Inc., Acciaierie Valbruna S.P.A., Intervenors

2016-2482

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 11, 2017

Robert- A. Jaffe, Kutak Rock LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Lizbeth' Robin Levin-son.

Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the General Counsel, United ■ States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Wayne W. Herrington, Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Dominic L, Bianchi.

Stefan Mentzer, White & Case.LLP, New York, NY, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Dimitrios T. Drivas; Gregory J. Spak, James P. Gagen, Ting-Ting Kao, Sonia W. Murphy, Washington, DC.

(Dyk, Linn, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

              CASE CREDIT CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Case Credit Corporation (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
J. McGrane, III, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2002

                                   By /s/ WILLIAM J. MCGRANE, III
                                   ------------------------------
                                          William J. McGrane, III
                              Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Director and
                          Authorized Signatory for Case Credit Corporation)

                                       23