#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clinton Mack REID, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-50015

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 9, 2017 Pasadena, California

Filed June 22, 2017

Andrew Richard Haden, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Janies Fife, Attorney, Kara Hartzler, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defehdant-Appellee

Before: LIPEZ,* BEA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Kermit V. Lipez, United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, sitting by designation,

MEMORANDUM **

Clinton Reid was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) after a search of his vehicle by San Diego police officers revealed a loaded handgun. The district court granted Reid’s motion to suppress the handgun, and the government appealed that order. We have jurisdiction over that interlocutory appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3731. We reverse and remand.

1. Officers were dispatched to a park after receiving two separate reports of fighting and drug use. Members of a violent street gang had congregated in the park to celebrate a gang holiday, and criminal activity had occurred in the park on previous holidays. When uniformed officers entered the park, Reid, wearing gang colors, “quickly” walked away and “seemed to be the most nervous of everybody.” Reid went to a nearby parked car, sat in the backseat for five to seven seconds, and appeared to place something in the car before walking away. Officers stopped Reid on his way back to the park. An officer testified at the hearing on the motion to suppress that based on his background, training, and experience, Reid was likely “dumping” illegal contraband in the car. Officers had found illegal narcotics and firearms on attendees of this event in the past. Given the totality of the circumstances, there was “particularized and objective basis for suspecting” that Reid had put contraband in his car. *United States v. Valdes-Vega,*738 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc) (citation omitted). The stop was therefore supported by reasonable suspicion, which, as we have observed, “is not a particularly high threshold to reach.” *826*Id.; see Terry v. Ohio,*392 U.S. 1, 30-31, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

2. Officers learned that Reid was a convicted felon during the *Terry*stop. From outside the car where Reid had been sitting, officers observed a bulge in the shape of a handgun in a pouch behind the driver’s seat. With limited exceptions, a convicted felon may not possess a firearm. *See*18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); Cal. Penal Code § 29800. These “facts and circumstances within [the officers’] knowledge” were “sufficient to warrant a reasonable belief that” Reid was a prohibited possessor of a handgun, and the officers therefore had probable cause to search the car. *See United States v. Noster,*590 F.3d 624, 633 (9th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted).1

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Reid did not contend below that the search was deficient for failure to obtain a search warrant.