# r,.v'··.

ISSUES RELATING TO VOC REGULATION CUTPOINTS, DEFICIENCIES, AND D1:VJA TIONS
Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 FEDERAL 

# RE:GISTER

May 25, 1988

Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Program Branch Air Quality Management Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

### I NTt<\JUUCT IUN



### Jn Novemoer 

### 24, 1Y87, EPA proposed its**post-19~7** 

### ozone and caroon :nonvAlue 1J011cy st.Ht!lnent. In that prol)osal tne A':Jency descr·1oeo a proceS$ to

### mat~ SIP deficiency "calls" pursuant to Section 

## 11U(a){2)(HJ 

# or**:~t!** 

### Clean Air Act. Apl)endix I) 

### oT' tne**~o~rllposed** 

### policy stat.ement contained a listiny of 

### SIP deficiencies and inconsistencies that**snoul~** 

### oe**a~art!ssea** 

### ana corrected wnen States respona to such SIP cal Is.

nlt! 

### purpose of tnis document is to provide additional clarifica:ion or ::1ose art!aS descr1Ded in Al)pendix U in wnic:n existiny ReasllnclDiy Avai laote _;Jntrol Tecnnology (RACT) regulations for volatile organic cctmpounas (VOC, 

### nave not Ot!en adoptea and/or implt!mente.d on a nationally cons1stent oas1s. ThlS clarification does not expand or modify existing federal regulatory**r~~u1rements,** 

### but merely ennances Appendix 0 

### by l)rovidiny**mar·~::** 

### spec1t1c 1nfonnation in cases wnere l)ast EPA guidance or approved rulE!making was va':)ue or amoiyuous. This document does not address issues cC>vereo in**~ppenaix** 

## 0 related to new source review regulations.
In tne Apri I**1~1:!7** 

### 1 etter from tne EPA Administrator to 1:11e Governurs of 

### 42 States, EPA announced its intention to undertake a thrE!e-part process 1n its**post-1~1:!7** 

### Sll-' revisions. First, EPA was to**r1~view** 

### all**fecierally-a~o~~roved** 

### contro·l commitments in the State implementation plan ':.J 

### Ot!tenni ne wnetner tney nave been**ado~o~ted.** 

### Second, EPA**wa~i** 

### to revi ':!w**wn~tner** 

### tnese aaopted measures are technically adequate and**n~eet** 

### minimum natton41 standaras T'or consistency. Third, EPA was to 1nitiate a comprenens i ve**~o~rogram** 

### to detenni ne whether adopted measures are be1i ny**effec~** 

### i vel.y lmplementeo. Tnis aocument addresses many of tne "Appendix IJ"**~o~roolems** 

### uncovered during the second part of this process. Corrections of the aefic1encies aescrioed herein provide for a yreater aeyree or equitt and national consistency among all States ana localities tha1: receive**post-1~~7** 

### ozone SIP cal Is.

### ISSU~S 

## KtLATlNb Tu VOC KtbULATIUN**CUTPUINT~.** 

## DEFICIENCIES ANO DEVIATIONS**~xecutive** 

## Summary

aased on**A~pendix** 

## 0 of Federal Register of November 24,**19~7**



### 2.**~A~T** 

## Keyulation Exemptions··**~** 

## wnere EPA has**~reviously s~ecifiea**  

## a reyulation size cutoff (1n CTG or other guidance documents·-e.g •• model regulation documents, sucn as**EPA-4~U/2-7~-UU4** 

## ana**EPA-~U~/2-7ts·UU1).** 

## State**n~ust lncort-~oratc:**  

## tnese cutoffs if their existing regulations are less**strin~ent.** 

## \See Attacnment l)**~** 

## Where**~PA** 

## has**~r~viously s~ec1ri~d**  

## 3 ID 

## VOC/hr or**1~** 

## lo**VOC/d~J** 

## cutufi, State may use it on actual ernissions basis or**us~** 

## 10 tiJ.Y tneorl:!tlcaa t)Ott!ntial emissiuns (design**Cd~acity** 

## (or mclxlmum proauctionj ancJ**~7bU** 

## hr/yr)**beior~** 

## ada-on controi.-Car·e shoula oe taken to make enforceable any reyulations specified on an "actual" emissions basis •

., Cutorf total determined from the sum of individual emi!;siun sour:es witnin same CTG category. (Exception: Petroleum markE!tiny

-- storaye'tanks, terminals, and loadin\:1 rcScks mustoe**con~oin~a.)**



## ., States may only use higher cutoffs if SUtJpOrted oy !l':. 

## cmalysis on an emissions oasis (snowiny tnat no siynlficant emissiuns**airrer~ntlal** 

## occurs between EPA guidance and State chOice). (See Attachment 2) Uetinition of lUO tpy non-CTG source-- 0

0
0 

## Aggre\:late all unregulated sources (including sources wt1ich woul a nave oet!n covered oy a CTG if they had been aoove the**f~PA-cScce~tea** 

## size cutoff--e.g •• <lOU tpy graphic drts sources). Base on theoretical potential emissions**(desi~n** 

## capacil:y (or maximum production] and**~76U** 

## nr/yr) oefore add-on contr·ol.- Cannot merely apply less-tnan-RACT controls to avoid applicabillty. Can restrict nours of operation by legally ana federally enrorceaole permit conditions to limit emissions below lOU tpy. "Once-in-always-in"**conce~t** 

## must**a~~ly** 

## (i.e •• if 

## emiss·ions are found**abov~** 

## cutoff, then State must**a~~ly** 

## RACT thereafter).
3. 

## Form of**SurfcSc~** 

## Coatiny Emission Limit Units--**~ ~eyulations**  

## snould oe expressed as lo VOC/9a1 or codtiny (less water and "exempt" solvents). "Exempt" solvents are tt1ose**a~ter.ninea** 

## oy EPA to nc1ve neylll:fible**~notocnemical** 

## rea<:tlvity. See VOC definition,· page 

## 1-2.

o 

## If "equivalent" add-on controls, transfer efficiency. or emission traainy (cross line averaging) are contemplated, tnen r·egulation snould.also oe expressed as lo VUC/yal of solids (or lb VUC/lb so 1 ids 10'rgraphi c arts).

o 

## Alternatlvely, tne re\:lulat1on cc1n contain a calculation conversion**proc~dure** 

## to determine**com~liance.** 

## Procedure must be c:learly defined**r~..,** 

## I i Cc!D

### I~, 

## ana consider**tn~** 

## aoove factors. (See At tctc:nment 3) '

o 

## Daily emission caps are desirable but not mandatory unl,ess estab- !lshed as**l)a~t** 

## of tne SlP control-.strategy. They canMt oe**us~a** 

## 1n exchanye tor a relaxation of RACT.

## 1-2**~. ~xempt**  

## Solvents-- • Treat as water in "lb VOC/gal coating less water" calculations. • Cannot take credit in emissions inventory and attai11ment demonstration or·new source review for control of exempt solvents. • Exempt only those solvents determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity listed in the five Federal Reaister notices C see RECOf-1f.1EtiOA TIOfJ FOR EXEHPT**SOLVE~HS.** 

## page 

## 2-5. l 5. VOC Definition-- • Cannot use 0.1 mm Hg 

## vapor pressure cutoff--**inconsist~nt wi~h** **C:~A** 

## reactivity policy. Such a definition would exempt compounds of 1 

## ow vo 1 

## a ti 1 

## i ty. which, under certain processes. wou 'I 

## d vo 1 

## a til i 

### ze 

## and, therefore, participate in photochemical reactic)ns. • Model definition: "Volatfle organic compound (VOC)--Any organic compound which participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions

.. This incluces any organic compound other than the following compounds: methane, ethane, methyl chloroform (1,1,1-trichloroethanel.**CFC-11~** 

## (trichlorotrifluoroethane), methylene chloride, CFC··ll Ctrichlorofluoromethane), CFC-12 (dichlorodifluoromethanel. CrC-22 (chlorodifluoromethane), FC-23 (trifluoromethane), c:FC-114 ( di chl 

## oro tetra fl uoroethane), CFC-115 ( ch 1 

## or open ta 

## fl uoroetha ne l. These compounds have been determined to have negl i gii b le photochemical reactivity. For purposes of determining cc,mpliance with 

## emission limits, VOC will be measured by the approved test methods. Uhere such a method_ a 1 

## so inadvertently measures compounds wi tt'l negligible photochemical reactivity, an owner 

## or operator may 

## exclude these negligibly reactive compounds when determining compliance with an emissions standard."
6. 

## Corrections 

## for Other VOC Rule Definitions-- • List from Appendix D: 

## (coating, coating line, refirlishing, paper coating, fabric coating, vi ny 1 

## coating) • EPA Regions to make SIP calls on State-specific defiinitional**proble~s** 

## to ensure consistency with CTG's and to avoid vague and ambiguous wording. 7. 

## Transfer Efficiency (TE)-- • Where SIP allows credit 

## for TE, SIP must clearly state the applicable baseline, emission limit, and test procedure. A 

## replicable baseline should be no less stringent than standard industry practice. • 60% default baseline acceptable for most large appliances,**~~~etal** 

## furniture, and miscellaneous metal coating operations; however, testing for actual TE above 60: default baseline is needed to determine final compliance. • 30% pefault baseline generally acceptable for certain auto coatincs: i.e., surfacer and top coat waterborne equivalence (i.e., 2.8 lb

- VOC/gal coating, less water at 30% TE). See page 2··22. • TE cannot be used as an alternative means of control unless baseline is specified and test method is approved as part of the SIP. • Source-specific SIP revision is required unless use of TE is approved pursuant to 9eneric SIP**provis~on** 

## (see discussion, page 2-14). • Actual TE's must be used; no NSPS TE table values allowed for final 

## RACT cornpli a nee.**-~-** 

## 1-3


# s. Cross-Line Averaging (Bubble)-- • In cases where a State, prior to the post-1987 SIP call, has previously granted (without EPA approval) cross-line averaging to a source, the State must include the cross-line averaging scheme for 

## approval as a source-specific SIP revision under· the emissions tradino (ET) 

## policy (see 57 FR 

## 43814, 12-4-86). Tre·at this as a de**fac~o** 

## pending bubble, but only for purposes of the additional 20:-control requirement. • Source-specific revision must meet ET policy on daily weighted average bash • If approved under generic bubble rule, generic rule must also meet provisions of ET policy • The following situations are examples of cross-line averaging: (1) 

## The source averages emissions between two or 

## mc1re separate operations (e.g., auto prime coat and top coat) with the same or different regulatory limits; and ( 2) The source averages emissions between two or 

## mc1re similar processes (e.g., separate conveyor lines of similar machines) with the same or different regulatory limits.
9. 

## Compliance Periods-- • SIP must clearly state compliance period (e.g., hour·ly, daily) anc: averaging method (arithmetic or 

## weighted). • Regu 1a 

## ti on must require comp 1 

## i ance on no 1 

## onger thar1 daily basis (generally**acceptable)~** 

## • Longer than 24-hr averaging must meet EPA policy (O·'Connor memo 1-20-84) • Compliance date extensions must meet EPA policy (Potter**mer.~o** 

## 8-7-86)

. 10. Recordkeeping Requirements-- •**r~ust** 

## keep records consistent with compliance time fr·ames--daily compliance requires daily records • Employ most recent EPA recordkeeping guidance (guidance forthcoming). ll. Test**~1ethods--Use** 

## most current EPA acceptable methods. Al 1 methods must be specified in the SIP. (See Attachment 4) For auto topcoating operations, see page 2-22. 12. 

## Capture Efficiency-- • Specify capture efficiency test method where capturE! efficiency is discussed or 

## implie1 in limit (e.g., web-coating opE!rations with add-on control). • Employ most recent guidance on capture efficiency tE!sting (guidance forthcoming).
13. 

## Equipment Leak Components-- • Inaccessible valves 

## are required to be monitored at least annually. • Unsafe-to-monitor valves are required to be**mon;tort~d** 

### when conditions 

## would allow these valves to be monitored safely, e.!J·• during shutdown. 14. 

## Exemptions, Variances, and Alternative Means of Control-- • Generic approva 1 of emission trades is a 1 ready cove1·ed by EPA's emission trading policy statement (51 FR 43814, Dect!mber 4, 1986).

### 1-4



## • All SIP's must specify whether approval of source-specific exemptions, variances, and/or alternative means of control shall be accomplished as a source-specific SIP revision or by a determination of approval by 

## the State Director (a "generic" provision). All such generic determinations and supporting documentation shall be submitted to the appropriate**~egional** 

## Office. • To be approvable, a provision for generic approval of source-specific exemptions, variances, and/or alternative means.of control must

-- •• specify appropriate test methods and other replicable criteria in accordance with guidance issued by EPA; AND •• reQuire that any 

## source seeking approval**o~** 

## exemption, variance, or alternative means of control demonstrates that its control method achieves emissions reductions equal to 

## or greater than the emission reductions reQuired by the SIP. • Provisions that are intended to be generic (i.e., not reQuiring caseby-case EPA approval 

## for the alternative means to be federally effective) must**~eet** 

## the general principle of replicability described in EPA's emissions trading policy statement (51**~R** 

## 43850, 

## December 4, 1986). 

## • Federal Reaister notices that approve SIP revisions containing general prov1sions that may be construed as generic procedures should include ·.EPA's**"~arning"** 

## about residual authority to 

## ensure consistent**~ctions**



## under generic procedures. See page 2-14. 

## • Seasonal controls (other than shutdown of natural gas afterburners or use of emulsified asp.halt) not allowed • State redesignation to attainment classification must not affect applicability of regulations. The EPA will approve a redesignation under 40 

## CFR Part 81 

## only if 

## it meets EPA's redesignation policy.

## YHAT DOES SIP CALL MEAN? (Regarding VOC RACT Rules)
Response to SIP calls will be made in two phases as described belo.,,: 

## riRST PHASE--LIMITED RESPONSE \S!? revision due 1 year after work plan is submitted under SIP call)

• llo 

## addition a 1 

## regu 1 

## a tory reQuirements added

• Meet all previously applicable reQuirements for 

## 1987 extension areas and 

## 1982 SIP call areas ("Level Playing Field") (e.g., consistent cutoffs, test methods). All such areas must meet

.. reoui remen ts of Groups I, 

## I I, 

## and II I 

## CTG source categories.

• No additional RACT reQuirement <100 tpy for 

## contiguous rural cour.ty**SECO~O** 

## PHASE--FULL RESPOHSE (After EPA Publishes Final Ozone/CO Policy)

• llew additional reQuirements possible for 

## additional MSA and new contiguous (rural) SIP call areas. (May be mandatory or 

## discretionary-- depends upon final policy). Groups I and II Group III

> 

## 100 tpy non CTG

•**~lew** 

## rec:uirements possible for 

## new isolated rural SIP call areas. Again, depends upon final policy. Groups I and**II:~** 

## 100 tpy coverage only

# z-z

CTG RACT REGULATION**CUTOFFS/EXEMPTIO~S**



## • Recommended cutoffs contained in CTG's, model regulations, or 

## EPA policy memorandums (See Attachment 1)



## • For additional CTG categories size cutoffs, see SELECTED COATIHGS CTG CATEGORY RECOr·mEtmED EXEHPTION LEVEL, page 16.



## • Calculating regulation size cutoffs for CTG sources

•• Base tpy cutoff on theoretical potential to emit (design capacity [or maximum production] and 8760 

## hr/yr) before add-on controls. Care should be taken to make enforceable any regulations specified on an "actual" emissions basts.

•• Cutoff total determined from the sum of individual emission sources within same CTG category (Exception: petroleum marketing--storage-tanks, terminals and loading racks must be combined)

• • Apply RACT if**plan~i** 

## de emi s.si ons > 

## cutoff 1 

## imi t ·


## •• If caught with emissions > 

## cutoff limit in the future, then State must apply RACT ("once in, always in")

•• CTG area sources have no cutoff (e.g., cold cleaner degreasers and tank trucks)

• SIP call requires States to assess their existing VOC regulations and address cutoffs in EPA guidance. Exemptions can be granted only by way of the 

# s: rule (see Attachment 2)



## • In cases where past guidance recomfl'lends high cutoff**(e.~~** 

## •• 100 

## tpy l, 

## SIP call should also recommend that State investigate small exemption levels to prepare for 

## additional emission reductions under full response to SIP ca 11**-~-** 

## Z-3 DEFINITION OF 100 

## TPY NON-CTG SOURCE

• Based on theoretical potential to emit (design capacity [.2.!:, 

## maximur.1 production] and 8760 

## hr/yr) before add-on controls

• 7o determine**if~** 

## 100 

## tpy:

•• aggregate emissions of all nonregulated sources 

## --include sources which would have been covered by a CTG if they had been above the EPA-accepted size cutoff--e.g., <100 

## tpy graphic arts sources --exclude regulated CTG sources

• If > 

## 100 

## tpy, evaluate RACT on all unregulated source types in plant

• Even "status quo" (RACT-level) emissions must be put in r·egulation or federally enforceable permit form to avoid increases**(e.~r** 

## •• emission levels without any additional controls)

• To achieve "below 100 

## tpy" (and avoid RACT), a State may limit production or capacity and specify this limitation in a federally er1forceable permit (cannot just apply minima 1 

## controls to go bel ow lCIO 

## tpy)

• Employ "once-in-always-in" concept for applicability

## 2-4



## FORM OF SURFACE COATING EMISSION LIMIT UNITS

• Recommended form of emission limit--pounds VOC per gallon coating (less water and "exempt" solvents•)

• However, if rule 

## or SIP allows:

•• determination of compliance from "equivalent" add-on controls,

•• credit 

## for transfer efficiency, 

## or

•• emissions trades and cross-line averaging

• ihen rule must have VOC limits expressed as both:

•• pounds VOC per gallon coating (less water and exempt solvents) to aid in compliance determination

**~** 

## •• pounds 

# vee per gallon solids (or pounds 

# voc per pound of solids for. graphic arts)

**~** 

## •• provide clearly defined, replicable conversion calculation procedure to obtain eQuivalent limit (See Attachment 3)

• Daily emission caps are desirable, but not mandatory unless they are established as part of the SIP control strategy. Daily emission caps cannot be used ·in exchange 

## for a relaxation of RACT.

**•"~.xempt"** 

## s'91vents are those determined by EPA to have negligible

photochemical reactivity. See VOC DEFINITION, page 2-6.

## 2-5**RECO~trtENDA** 

## TION FOR EXEMPT SOL VENTS

• :heck all regulations

• Cannot allow circumvention of 

## EPA reactivity policy base1j on other VOC definitions and exemptions

•**~cr** 

## calculation purposes. any exempt compounds shall be ·treated as water

• Cannot talce credit for 

## control of 

## exempt sol vents for 

## pul'"poses of emissions inventory and attainment demonstrations or 

## new source review

• Exempt solvents are only those identified in the following Federal Register notices:

•• 42 

## FR 35314, 7/8/77 

## (Table 1)

•• ·42 

## FR 38931, 8/1/77 

## (corrects 7/8/77 

## FR)

•• 44 

## FR 32042, 6/4/79

•• 45 

## FR 32424, 5/16/80 

## (clarifies 6/4/79 

## FR)

•• 45 

## FR 48941, 7/22/80

# I I. 

## 2-4

FORM OF SURFACE COATING EMISSION LIMIT UNITS

• Recommended form of emission limit--pounds VOC per gallon coating (less water and "exempt" solvents•)

• However, if rule or 

## SIP allows:

•• determination of compliance from "eQuivalent" add-on controls,

•• credit for transfer efficiency, or



## •• emissions trades and cross-line averaging

• ihen rule must have VOC limits expressed as both:

•• pounds VOC per gallon coating (less water and exempt solvents) to aid in compliance determination and

•• pounds VOC per gallon solids (or pounds VOC per pound of solids for graphic arts)

or



## •• provide clearly defined, replicable conversion calculation procedure to obtain eQuivalent limit (See Attachment 3)

• Daily emission caps are desirable, but not mandatory unless they are established as part of the SIP control strategy. Daily emission caps cannot be used ·in exchange for a relaxation of RACT.**•"~xemptu** 

## s'olvents are those determined by EPA to have neglligible photochemical reactivity. See VOC DEFINITION, page 2-6.I"'' 

## 2-7



## CORRECTIONS FOR OTHER VOC RULE DEFINITIONS

• List 

## from proposed ozone policy--

Appendix 0

•• coating



### •• coating 1 

### i ne



## •• refinishing



## •• paper coating



## •• fabric coating

•• vinyl coating
•·EPA Regions to make SIP calls on State-specific definitio1nal problems to ensure consistency with CTG's and to avoid vague 

## or aml:>iguous wording.

## 2-8



## TRAHSFER EFFICIENCY (TE)

• Where SIP allows credit forTE, SIP must clearly state the applicable baseline based on standard industry practice, emission l·imit, and fully replicable• test procedure for 

## transfer efficiency.

• Current guidance: in most cases, can accept use of 60: 

## transfer efficiency as baseline for:**--~arge** 

## appliances**--~~eta** 

## 1 furniture --r>1i scellaneous meta 1 parts

• Testing for actual TE above the 60: 

## default baseline is needed to deter-mine final compliance

• In most cases accept use of 30: 

## TE as baseline for auto surfacer and topcoat waterborne eQuivalence (i.e., 2.8 

## lb VOC/gal coating less**wa~~r** 

## at 30: 

## TE) (see page 2-22)



## • TE cannot be used as an alterna·tive means of control unless baseline is specified and test method is approved as part of the SIP

• Source-specific SIP revision is reQuired unless use of TE is approved pursuant to generic SIP provision (see discussion on EXEMPTIONS, VARIA"CES, AND A(TERMATIVE MEANS OF CONTROL, page 2-14)

.


## • Actual TE's must be used; TE table values (e.g., from NSPS) are unacceptable for final RACT compliance.

• For a discussion of replicability, see 51 FR 43850, 12/4/86

## 2-9



## CROSS-LINE AVERAGING (BUBBLE)

• In cases where a State, prior to the post-1987 SIP call, has previously granted (without EPA approval) cross-line averaging to a source, the State must include the cross-line averaging scheme for approval as a source-specific SIP revision under the emissions trading (ET) policy (see 51 FR 43814, 12/4/86). Treat this as a de facto pendina bubble, but only for purposes of the additional 20: 

## c'Ontr:ori='eou1irement.

• Sased on daily weighted average

•**:~o** 

## credit for 

## downtime; however, credit a 11 owed when ther·e are enforceable production limits.

• Must be submitted as source-specific SIP rev1s1on, unless processed by the State under an EPA-approved bubble rule.**~ust** 

## be consistent with provisions of EPA ET policy

• If allowed under EPA-approved generic bubble rule, generic rule must

meet EPA ET policy*

• Fix deficiencies in calculation procedures or 

## compliance techniQues associated with generic regulations

• The following situations are examples of cross-line averaging:

• • the source a vera ges emissions be tween two or more sepct 

### rate 

## operations (e.g., 

## auto prime coat and top coat) with 1:he same or different regulatory limits; and

•• the source averages emissions between two 

## or more 

### simiilar 

## processes (e.g •• separate conveyor lines of similar mclchines) with the same or different regulatory limits**·~OTE:** 

## SIP call needed for currently approved generic bubble rules that are inconsistent with EPA 

## ET policy**~.:..** 

## 2-10 COMPLIANCE PERIODS

• SIP must clearly state compliance period (e.g., hourly, daily) and averaging method (arithmetic or weighted)

• In general, regulation must reQuire compliance on no lon1ger than a daily basis

• Averaging times longer than 24 hours allowed Ot,LY in acc:ordance with established EPA policy (O'Connor memo--1/20/84)

• Averaging periods in excess of 24 hours are not allowed generically. Must receive EPA approval as SIP revision

• Reexamine pre-O'Connor memo approvals of > 

## daily averagi'ng to ensure that RACT levels of control are applied

• Compliance date extensions allowed only in accordance w'ith 

## Potter memo (8/7/86)

### 2-11

RECOROKEEP ltlG REOU I REf.lEtiTS



## •**~eep** 

## records consistent with compliance time frames--daily compliance reQuires daily records

• Record or calculate coating solids use and 

## VOC emitted consistent with compliance time frames

EXAliPLES: gallons of solids per day pounds of 

## VOC per day (This allows. for instance. one to calculate compliance with a VOC

limit in terms of 1b VOC/gal of solids)

• List amount of diluents and (where relevant to determining compliance)

wash and clean-up solvents

• Document use of EPA test .methods 

## or EPA-approved State r:ll!thod in calculating 

## VOC content of coatings

•**Docu~ent** 

## methods used to calculate volume percent solids content of coatings

• Separately enforceable provisions must clearly reQuire ri!Cordlceeping

• Employ most recent EPA recordlceeping guidance

### +<:--· 

### 2-12



## TEST METHODS AND CAPTURE EFFICIENCY

• Use most current VOC test methods (See Attachment 4). F()r auto topcoating operations, see page 2-22.

• All oethods must be specified in the SIP.

• Procedures should allow verification of accuracy. of test data.

• Prescribe capture efficiency test method where capture efficiency is discussed 

## or implied in limit (e.g •• web-coating operattions with add-on control). ·
··Employ most recent EPA guidance on capture efficiency testing.-fC.<__ 

## 2-13

EOU I PMENT LEAK COf·1PONENTS



## • Sources previously exempt from monitoring (e.g, plug and ball valves) subject to SIP 

## reQuirements

• Inaccessible valves are required to be monitored at least annually.

• Unsafe-to-monitor valves are required to be monitored**whE~n** 

## conditions would allow .these valves to be monitored safely. e.g •• during shutdown

.



# .

.

## • 2-14
EXEMPTIONS, VARIANCES, AHO ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF CONTROL Generic approval of emission trades is already covered by EPA's emission trading policy statement (51 

## FR 43814, 

## December 4, 1986). 

## For information on emissions trading, see page 2-9.

• All SIP's must specify whether approval of source-specific exemptions, variances, and/or alternative means of control shall be**acco~plished** 

## as a source-specific SIP revision 

## or by a determination of approval by the State Director (a "generic" provision). All such generic determinations and supporting documentation sha 11 

## be submitted to' 

## the appropriate**~egional** 

## Office.

• To be approvable, a provision 

## for generic approval of source-specifi: exemptions, variances, and/or alternative means of contr·ol must--

•• specify appropriate test methods and other**replicable~** 

## criteria in accordance with guidance issued by**EPA;~** 

## •• reQuire that any source seeking approval of an exemption, variance, or alternative means of control demonstrates that iU control method achieves emissions reductions equal to 

## or greatter than the emission reductions required by the SIP.

• Provisions that are intended to be generic (i.e., not rE!quiring caseby-case EPA approval for the alternative means to be federally effective) must meet the general principle of replicability described in EPA's emissions trading policy statement (51 

## FR 43850, 

## DecembE!r 4, 1986).



## • Federal Reaister notices that approve SIP revisions containing general provisions that may be construed as generic procedures lihould include the following statement: It should be noted that, similar to EPA's treatment of generic bubble rules (51 

## FR 43853, 

## ·column 3, 12-4-66), 

## if a State-approved action under a generic rule does not meet all the requirements for replicability, it 

## cannot be considered part of the SIP and by definition cannot replace prior valid emission limits in the SIP. Should EPA determine, as a result of its oversight activities that a State-approved action is inconsistent with the above requirements, it will notify the Stllte and source in writing and specify any necessary rernedial measures. In such circumstances, EPA may take app1r-opriate remedial action to assure attainment and maintenance, including direct enforcement of the original SIP l"imits.

• Seasonal controls (other than shutdown of natural gas afterburners 

## or use of emulsified asphalt) are not allowed.

• State redesignation to attainment classification must n1ot affect applicability of**r~gulations.** 

## The-EPA will approve a redesignation under 40 

## CFR Part 81 

## only if it meets EPA's redesignati1on policy.

## 2-15



## AOOITIOHAL CLARIFICATION BY CTG SOURCE CATEGORY (For Selected Categories)

### 2-16 

## SELECTED COATINGS CTG CATEGORY**RECOMME~DED** 

## EXEMPTION LEVEL
Applicable Source Categories: Can**~1eta1** 

## Coil**~leta** 

## 1 Furniture**~1a** 

## gne t ;1i 

## re Large Appliance**~1iscellaneous** 

## !·1etal Parts Flat Uood Paneling Paper Coating Fabric Coating

State may use:

• 10 

## tpy theoretical potential emissions (design capacity [2r**maximu~** 

## production] and 8760 hrs/yr) before add-on control
·.3 

## lb VOC/hr or 15 

## lb/day actual emissions before add-on control

• To show that there is 

## no significant difference between "State-derive.j cutoffs" and EPA guidance, States must apply 

# Ns: rule" (See Attachment 2) to allow higher cutoff. Analysis must be based on comparison of:

•• emissions after control under presumptive cutoff--with

•• emissions after control under higher cutoff

•• NOTE: 

# s: rule applies to entire source category, not individual sources. RACT is the test for 

## individual sourc:es.

• Allow coatings usage rate (gal/day) as basis for exemption if shown eQuivalent to emission rate exemption (see EPA guidance**n~mo** 

## from Tom Helms, EPA/OAOPS, to Air Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X, Additional Information Concerning Emission Cut-off--3 lbs/hr, 15**lb~i/day.** 

## ::ovember 4, 1987).

## 2-17

GASOLINE LOADING TERMINALS

• > 

## 20,000 gal/day--considered terminal

• < 

## ZO,OOO gal/day • bulk plant

•**~llow** 

## rolling 30-day average 

## to determine applicability-··but not for determining compliance with emission limit

-----

• Employ "once-in-always-in" concept for 

## applic.ability

• CTG limit recommendation--SO mg/1

• Ensure that trucks using terminals pass leak-tight test



# . f· I**~;.**

## 2-18

GASOLINE BULK PLANTS

• Cefined as! 20,000 gal/day throughput

• Allowed exemption--< 4,000 gal/day throughput

• Recommend CTG control alternative #3 (Submerged fill +vapor balance--in and out)

• Allow rolling 30-day average for determining applicabiliity--but**~** 

## for determining compliance

• Employ "once-in-always-in" concept for 

## applicability

• Recommend tank truck must ·be certified leak tight at bu'lk plantI

## 2-19
LEAKS FROr1 PETROLEUt-1 REFINERIES

• Define "leak" as VOC concentration > 

## 10.000 ppm; VOC concentration**~** 

### 10,000 ppm is not a leak

• No CTG cutoff for petroleum refinery size --applies to all refineries

• Recommend consistency with SOCHI leak CTG guidance, i.e.,, valves located such that monitoring personnel must be el'!vated**~!meters** 

### above permanent support surfaces 

## or reQuire scaffolding**~~ight** 

### be exempt from Quarterly monitoring. Annual monitoring still reQuired.

# z-zo

MISCELLANEOUS REFINERY SOURCES

• vacuum producing systems, wastewater separators, and process unit t1.1rnarounds

• No CTG cutoffs

• Recommended cutoff--only recovered petroleum products with Reid vapor pressure 0.5 pounds 

## or greater are covered. Affec·ted sources are not covered if throughput of these recovered petroleum products is < 

## ZOO gal/day •

. •.**~lay** 

## a 1 so wish to consider 

## tiSPS where no cutoff is recomr.M!nded. Segregated storm water runoff drain systems and non-contc!ct cooling water systems are exempt.

## 2-21 

## SERVICE STATIONS--STAGE I

•**~egulation** 

## can be written two ways: --tank si ::e. or --gasoline tr.roughput

• Tank size:

.--exempt storage tanks < 

## 550 gal capacity for agricultural use --exempt < 

## 2,000 gal capacity storage tanks in place before 1/1/79 --exempt < 

## 250 gal capacity storage tanks in**plac~** 

## after 12/31/78

• Gasoline throughput: --exempt < 

## 10,000 gal/mo (120,000 gal/yr) throughput for service stations --allow rolling 30-day**~verage** 

## for applicability level--but not for compliance

---

• Employ "once-in-always-in" concept for applicability

• Apply 5: rule for other than 10,000 gal/mo (120,000 gal/yr) exemption (5: rule applies to the entire source category and not individual facilities).

## 2-22 AUTOMOBILE AND LIGHT DUTY TRUCK COATING

• EPA autocoating protocol is the preferred method for 

## ca'lculating aaily topcoat emission rate (protocol forthcoming)

• Topcoat regulation must be amenable to use of EPA autoc1Jating protocol:

•• Emission limit must be in units of lb VOC/gal of :solids deposited (2.8 lb VOC/ga1 coating, less water at 30 percent TE translates to 15.1 lb VOC/gal solids deposited)

•• Compliance must be calculated on a daily weighted average basis

•• Topcoat operation must include all spray booths, flash-off areas and ovens in which topcoat is applied, dried and cured (excludes final off-line repair).

• Emission limit for 

## surfacer (guidecoat) should be expressed in pounas of VOC per gallon of solids deposited with compliance calc:ulated on a daily weighted average basis if transfer efficiency is to be considered in determining compliance. In these cases, the EPA protocol may be**app1ica~~~** 

## for calculating daily surfacer emission rate.

• The SIP should specify whether anti-chip materials applied to main body**p~rts** 

## (e.g., rocker panels, tottom of doors and**fenders~** 

## and leading edge of roof) are treated as· surfacer or 

## misce11aneoous metal coating. These anti-chip materials should generally be treated as surfacer, especially if transfer efficiency is to be considered in compliance· demonstrations. Underbody**anti~chip** 

## (e.g •• underbody plastisol) should be specified as a miscellaneous metal coating.

• Coatings other than primer, surfacer, topcoat and final repair should generally be considered miscellaneous metal coatings. (See**memorandu~** 

## from Richard Rhoads, EPA/OAQPS, to Directors, Air and Hazardous**:1a~e,.ia1s** 

## Division, Regions I-X, Applicability of VOC Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG's) to the Automobile Manufacturing Industry. July 31, 198C.)

• No CTG cutoffs

• Should define exemption level on plantwide basis

• CTG applies only to manufacture of new vehicles

• New and modified sources must also meet new source review requirements, which may include BACT and LAER.

## 2-23

CUTBACK OR £MULSIFIED ASPHALT

• Ho CTG cutoffs

• Recommend seasonal exemptions (i.e., outside of ozone season) as opposec to temperature forecasting (e.g. • < 

# so•F). (See memorand1um from Richar:: Rhoads, EPA/OAQPS, to Air 

## & Hazardous Materials Division Directors,**Re~ions** 

## I-X. Cutback Asphalt-acceptable RACT Regulation. December 19, 1975).



## • Specify (1) 

## no higher than 7,; oil distillate as maximur.1 allowable sohen: content in emulsified asphalt, as determined by**ASTr~** 

## dist·illation test D-244, or (2) allow use of certain grades or applications of emulsified asphalt-with the following maximum solvent contents as determined by**·AST~·1** 

## D-244: (a) 3: 

## Hmit for 

## seal coats used in early sp1ring or 

## late fall; (b) 3: 

## limit when chip seals used when aggregate is dusty or 

## dirty; (c) 

# e: limit when mixing with open graded aggregate that is not

. _well washed; and (d) 12: limit when mixing with dense graded aggregate (See memorandum from Richard Rhoads to Director. Air & 

## Hazudous r·laterials**~ivision,** 

## Regions I-X, Clarification for Final SIP Actions on Asphalt Regulations. October 4, 1979)



## • Other exemptions for use solely as penetrating prime coat and when stockpiled for extended periods ( 1 

## onger than 1 

## month) (See 1nemorandum from Richard Rhoads to Director, Air 

## & Hazardous Materials Division, Regions I-X, Cutback Asphalt-Acceptable RACT Regulation. D4!Cember 19, 1978).

## 2-24



## SOLVENT METAL CLEANING

•**~xemptions:** 

## See 

## CTG for appropriate cutoffs

• No 3 lb/hr, 15 lb/day exemption for small cold cleaner**d~!greasers** 

## (area source). (See memorandum from Richard Rhoads. EPA/I)AOPS, to Director, Air 

## & Hazardous Materials Division, Regions I-X. C1arification of Degreasing Regulation Requirements, September 7, 1978).

## 2-25 GRAPHIC ARTS

• CiG 

## cutoff < 

## 100 

## tpy potential emissions (design capacity and 8760 hr or 

## maximum production) before control

• EPA will accept as an alternative emission limit 0.5 

## lb VOC/lb soliC$ on a per line basis. (See memorandum from Darryl Tyler, EPA/OACPS, to**~irector,** 

## Air Division, Regions I-X, Alternative Compliance for 

## Graphic Arts RACT, September 9, 1987.)

• If a source wishes to average emissions across lines, it must meet the general provisions of the EPA emissions trading policy.

•**~:r.ploy** 

## "once.:.in-always-in" concept for 

## applicability

### ATTACHMENT 1
CTG APPLICABILITY: CUTOFFS,**EX~~TIONS,** 

### AND GENERAL APPLICABILITYI I 

### -I 

## CTG APPLICABILITY: CUTOFFS, EXEMPTIONS, AND GENERAL AP PLI CAB 

## I L lTY

7he E?A has**~ssued** 

## cont:-ol technique**gu~del~ne** 

## (CTG) documents fo" 30 sou:-:e**categor~es,-two** 

## :-egulatory**gu~del~ne** 

## documents**cove~~ng** 

## 25**o~ ~~ese**  

## 30 source**categor~es.** 

## and several**pol~cy** 

## and other miscellaneous**gu~dance** 

## memoranda. Part of the guidance provided in the CTG's, the**~wo ~egulatory**  

## documents, and the guidance memoranda concerns cutoffs,**exempt~ons,** 

## and other similar guidance on the applicability of the recommended cont:-ol techniques. This information is summarized**~n** 

## Tables 1, 2, and 3 for 29 of 

## the 30 source categories. The CTG for the 30tn source catego:-y, Vegetaole 

# on, was recommended by E?A not to be implemented by the States**unt~l** 

## test method uncertainties were resolved, and thus is not**inclu~e~ ~n**  

## these tables. A complete list of 

## refe:-ences is provided at the end of
:nese tables.**7n~s** 

## information represents guidance issued prior· to May, 1988. For categories with cutoffs listed as "None", no specific guidance on cutoffs has**~een** 

## issued for 

## this particular category although a 3 lb/hr or 15 lb/day general exemotion has been discussed in pre-1988 guidance. For current guidance on cutoffs for categories listed here as "None", see "Issues**~ela:~n;** 

## to VOC**~egulations.** 

## Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations

-**Clarificat~on** 

## to**~ppendix** 

## D of Novemoer 24, l9B7. Federal Register," May 1988.**~lso,** 

## for CTG Groups I and II for nonattainment areas that nei:ne"**"!Ceive~** 

## an**atta~nment** 

## date extension beyond 1982 nor received a**not~ce** 

## of**s:~** 

## deficiencies ("SIP cills"), States were not required to cover sources**wi~n emiss~ons**  

## less than 100 tons per year, even**~f** 

## the CTG or EPA**gu~aance conta~ne~**  

## no applicability size cutoff.

Last Update: 5/16/88tJAUHI.l:IHUIrsIURliltOlll'IC:HiC:AIEGUitI[SSmircl!CaleyoryIt:uloffsConunenlsI"ef..........................·····-········.............·•....................-·--·---·············-···-···········-·······-·1_.__L_o.._d_i_n_g________________________J___2.GasolineBulkPlants(a)Storayetankswtthlessthan2.000gallonsstoragecapacity(Ref.2.p.5-l)•(b)hemptionforbulkplantswtththroughputsoflessthan4.000yals_______1____c!!1__lRef1.P·.,.l.ServiceStationsStageIgasolinestoragecontainersoflessthan2.oosIHers(550gallons)capacityusedexclusivelyforthefuelingofimplementsofhusbandry.providedthecontainersareequippedwtthsul•neryedftilpipes(Ref.4.p.29).(b)<7.5UUliters(2.000gallons)capacitytttnranota.nLrc.in...u•..:I""..........,,,r·---beforel/l/79(Ref.4.p.29).(c)<948liters(250gallons)capacttystoragetanksint•laceafterli'/11//U("ef.4.p.29).•Bulkplantsaredefinedas<76.000IIters(20.000galIons)/daythrought•ut.i'.34.5!Soun:et:ateynryIAIIHI.riiiiiiiSIIIICtiiUJIII'ICHiCAflfilllti[S(cunlintwtl)t:lit()t'sCmttmentslteft!reru.e5.-••••....••••-I•-- . . . . ...•..•••••....••••••.I-•••••••••••••••••••...••••••••••••••••.••••••••••·I..••••••..•.•.•.(tl)ExemptIonsforservteestatiuntankswtththrt)uyhputsofnomorethan10,000yals/mopthorlltl,OOOyah/year____________________,__________-•---------------------_____________··--__________4.fixedRoof1etmtTanks5.MiscellaneousRefinerySources(VacuumProducingSystems,WastewaterSeparators,andProcessUnitTurnarounds)6.CutbackAsphalt(a)<l5U,tlOUliters(40,000gallons)storagecapacityofvolatilepetro)Pumltqutds(greathan10.5kPaTVP)(Ref.6,p.6-1).(b)<I,60U,OOUltters1420,000gallons)storagecapacityofcrudeoilandcondensatepriortoleasecustodytransfer•OoesnotapplytostoragevesselsequipJledwithexternalfloatingroofsbefore1/l/19·Doesnotapplytohorizontal,undergroundstoragetanksstortnyJP-4jetfuel(Ref.1,p.2).6,p.6-:!L____I--------------•Noneforvacuumproducingsystemsandprocessunttturnarounds.•<200ya1/dayforwasteseparators(Ref.4,p.A-bH)·None(seeC(XIIntent)·CTGrecommendscase-by-caseaddressingofinstancesinwhichcontrolmaynotbejusttfted(Ref.8,p.6-l).•IfaStatechoosesaIOUtonJleryearcutoff.theStatemustconstderatIState,locaI,andprivateuseInanareaforwhichthecontrolstrategydemonstrationIsdevelol't!•l(Rt!f.ttl,,,•6)b,14,89,ttl,11lf.r·-·---·-------·---Cate9nryIAliilI•UtiUITSItlltliltnlll1ICreiCArHitlltl[5(cuntInut!•I)t:utotfs(lllllllf!ntSlteft!fl!fl(t!\..-................-..........-•-....•I--..........-.......-...-..............•I•--..-...--...-.....-•---·-•-..·-......-..............-...-.•- .--.....-..-...- -...---••••b.CutbackAsphalt(continued)1.SolventHetalCleaning(a)Inurbannonattalnmentareas,opentopvapordegreaserswithanopenareaoflessthan1m2fromequipmentstandards(Ref.12,p.7-4)andconveyorlzedwithlessthan2.11mofair/vaporInterfacefromrequirementofamajorcontroldevice(e.CJ.,carbonadsorber)(Ref.12,p.3-34).(b)Inruralnonattatnmentareas,allcoldcleanerscanbeexen••tedandopento1•vapororconveyurtzedde9reaslnCJuperattonsatoneI'Iantlucatiunwlwrecmtsstunsdrt!IIIIIt.uns•UseofcutbackasphaltIsaa•t•rovahleunderthefollowtnycircumstances:(1)wherettcanbedemonstratedthatlong-ltfestockt•tllnCJIsnecessary,(2)wheretheasa•halttstoheusedsolelyasapenetrattnyprimecoat,(l)monthsdurlnytheyearwheretemperaturesilonotlingerabove50°Fforperiodsoftimeadequateforemulsifiedasphaltapplicationandsetting,and(4)whereHcanbedemonstratedthatnoVOCemissionswilloccurfromtheuseofthecutback(Ref.11,pp.2,1).•Noshecutoffsfromoperationalstandards•VolatilityofsolventIsusedtorequiregreatercontrolIncoldcleanersforthesamecontroltechniques(Ref.12,p.l-31).·OperatingandequipmentrequirementexemptionsforcoldcleanerswtthremotesolventreservotrSinootherexemptionsforcoldcleanersInurbannon-attainmentareas(Ref.13,p.1).12,13,14t'IAliiII,CllllllISItlitliiWIII'ICIIiI:AIIlillllI[S(wncluclt!ll).-.Stlur:r_;---...-.---....------------·-····-------··..-.--...-t:ctlt:utntfsCommentslteft!ft!Ufl!S••-•-.........-.............-4....._...............................--·-·······--·-···-···-----····--·---....."...__.,._....---.-.....--....-.-..'.SolventMetalorlessonctfacility-witlelldsishctsetlon(continued)annualsolvent1111rchaserecordscanbe"eKemptetl(Ref.14.I'·I).---H.CanCoattng•None15IJ.MetaICotIs•None1510.fabrtcs•None15II.·None1512.and•None15ltghkOutyTrucks13.Metalfurniture•None1614.MagnetWtre·None17--15.largeAppliances·None·Quickdryinglacquersusedtore1,airscratcheslHandnicksthatoccurduringassemblyareexemptfrornmeetinganyemissionlimits(Ref.1u.p.1-2).--rSuur(t!CategoryI.IeakfromPetroleumRefineriesIAUIIi'.t:IIIIIIISHllffiltnlll'IIUGCAJUilliUfSCutoftsIComments·leaksufconcentratIonslesslhdnoretJUaItolU,unoppm(Ref.IIJ,1•.6-1).·NocutoffforJ•etroleumrefineryapr•liestoallrefineries.Hl!ferenc•!sICJ,2U•NotIntendedtoaffectfactlttlesthatrecyclewastef!.tl(Ref.20,________________,________________2.MiscellaneousMetalParts·None-------------------3.flatWoodPaneltngI•None---------------·---------------------4.Synthesized•<l5lbs/day;foreachceuttcalProductsventfromreactors,distillationriperattons,crystalltzers,centrlfuyes,andvacuooadryers(Ref.23,p.l-5).•ThisregulationIsnotIntendedtocoversurfacecoatingofthefollowingmetala•artsandproducts:(I)automobileandlight-dutytrucks,(2)metalcans,(3)flatmetalsheetsandstripsIntheformofrollsorcoils,(4)magnetwireforuseInelectricalmachinery,(5)metalfurniture,(6)lar9eappliances,(7)exteriorofplanes,(8)automobilerefinishing,(9)customizedtopcoatlnyofautomobilesandtrucks,IfproductionIslessthan35vehiclesperday,and(10)exteriorofmarinevessels(_Ref.20,pp.28and29).•Doesnotapplytothemanufactureofexteriorsiding,tlleboard,orparticleboardusedasafurntturec01nponent(Ref.____•RecommendscutoffsIfcase-by-caseapproachIsnotpractical(Ref.23,p.1-5).•Requtrementforatrdryersandt•roducttone'tulpmentexhaustsystemsdifferat330lb/day(Ref.23,p.l-6).·Doesnotcoverfermentation,eKtrartionoforganicchemicalsfromlematedalsoranimaltIssues,andtornmlationanti.___tS(lt_ef2()!f161)_20.ll20,2220.23f.'·!·Sour.ce········Category!>.RubberTireHty.·NoneTABU'l.liiUIIII1IICHiCAflGIIIH1::S (contlnued)CutoffsICmntntmls·Doesnotat•t•lytothet•roductionnftiresforantiqueorothervehicleswhenproducedonanirregularbasIsorwtthshortproductionrunsonlyIfthesetiresareproducedonequipmentseparatefromnormalproductionlinesforpassengertypetires(Ref.-----------------·---------·--·----------11--2_0..._,_._p-'-._7_4_._)_.-----6.ExternalFloatingRoofPetroleumTanks(a)<150,000liters140,000gallons)ofstoragecapacity(Ref.25,p.5-l).(b)<1,600,000liters(42U,OOOgallons)storagecapacityusedtostoreproducedcrudeoiIandcondensatepriortocustodytransfer(Ref.25,p.5-3).•DoesnotapplytofixedrooftankswithorwithoutInternalfloatingroofs,ortosmallproductiontanks(Ref.25,p.1-2).•Doesnotapplytotankswithametallic-typeshoesealInaweldedtankwhichhasasecondarysealfromthetopoftheshoesealtothetankwallorexternalfloatingrooftanksstoringwaxy,heavypourcrudes(Ref.25,p.5-3).·Doesnotapplytopetroleumliquidstorage-vessels:(1)thatcontainpetroleumliquidwithatruevaporpressureoflessthan10.5kPa(1.5psta),and(2)containingJletroleumliquidwithatruevaporpressurelessthan27.6kPA(4.0psia)thatareofweldedconstructtonar.dpiesentlypossessaPietalltctypeshoeseal.aIi•1uid-mountedfoamseal,alittuid-mountedHttuidfUledtypeseal,orotherat•t•rovedclosuredt!vlceofde11K1nstratedet1uivalence(Ref.2U,I'·111!1).References211,2420.2!1r: · ·soair.ce- --- · - - -- --- · -- · Cateyory IAIIH 2. t:IIIUIIS llHt fiROlltt II f.IG CAfffiltiU[S (cuncludt.!d)
·-----------·.·· ---·--·----------------:---------··--

Cutoffs Com111ents References

·- -·- ....... ·--·· ............... -··-·-····················-•···· ... ··············-·····················-·-········ --·· ····- ......... .

6. External Floattny
Roof Petroleu•

____ **la•~k_!__(con~!__nued)** •Does not apply to horizontal underyround

storage tanks storing JP-4 jet fuel (Ref. 2S,

p. ?. ,

1. Graphic Arts **l·'!~o :1':''''**  **-~Rel.--2~~--l-------------·**

8. Perchloroethylene

Dry Cleaning ·None

-- -- 1------·

9. Gasoline Tank

Trucks and Vapor

Col teet ton Sys te• leaks ·None
------ .__ ___________________ _ ·Adsorbers are not required where there Is
Inadequate space to acca..odate the• or

where there ts no way to desorb the•. Other

. hardships •ay be found to exclude plants

froa using adsorbers (Ref. 27, p. 1-4).
·Adsorbers are also not required at coinoperated fact **lttt~s (Ref!_~(),_**  &»!_ ll@).

·The affected facilities are (I) gasoline tank

trucks that are ·equipped for vapor collection

and C2) the vapor collection syste•s at bulk
ter•lnals, bulk plants, and service stations

that are equipped with vapor balance and/or

vapor processing _9.ste11S (Ref. 28LP· 2). 211, 26 20, 21 281·I.SourceCateyuryPolymerHanufacturinyIAUHJ.t:liiUIISUIRGIUIIII'Illt:lfiCArUiflltU.Srutofts·ApJlroximatelyl,UIIUtonsofIiyhlIi•I11itlamlgaseousVOCprocessed(Sl!I!CUIIIIIII!Ill).Comments•Provides·guidelinestoStatestocalculateuncontrolledemissionratesbelowwhichRAc:rmaybeunreasonableandStatescouldconsldertheexempttonofplantswithuncontrolledemissionsatorbelowtheseemissionlevels,Rt!feli.J-----------------------·----------.---------------__,___________----------------·----------l.SOCHIandPolymerHfy.Equipmentleaks3.largePetroleumDryCleaners·leaksofconcentrationslessthanIU,UOOppm(Ref.30,p.3-2).·DoesnotapplytopetroleumsolventdrycleaningfactlIttesthatconsumelessthan123,000liters(32,5UUgallons)ofpetroleumsolventannually(Ref.31,-----------------------·-4.AirOxidationProcesses-SOCHi•factIItieshavingatotalresourceseffectiveness(lRE)indexvaluegreaterthanone(I)wouldnotbere•1utredtomeetRACT•Smal1processunitsmaybeexemt•tedfromImplementtnyroutlneleakdetecttonandret•alrprogramsonthebastsofcosteffectivenessforthesesmallunits(Ref.30,p.4-1).•ProcessunitsprocessingonlyheavyliquidVOCorprocessingonlynon-VOCandequipmentoperatingundervacuummayalsobeexemt•ted3U(Ref.30,p.------·-------------31----------------------·--------------32___l?_t______,___________________________________.._______.____lftulpmentl.eaksfromNaturallias/GasolineProlesstnyfJI(a)leakswithvncconcentratInnslesslhdnliJ,IJIJIJ,,,,m·lloesnotat•t•lytoetlulpmentotterattnyuntlt!rvacuun1andtoequlpmt!nlInht•avyIitttdtlservlet!(Ref.JJ,I'·4-l).JJtIAUHJ.t:lllllltSttlltliiWlll'IIIClGCAJLiill!U1::S (wncltult!cl)·····s-oairce--·---·--------·-···-··------·-CateyoryCutoffsCommentsHeferenct!s......-.-..-.-...............--........-............................-·-.......-....-...-..-.-.-...........-...-...--..................-..........£qutpmentLeaksfromNaturalGas/.GasoltneProcesstngPIants(conttnued)(b)Statesmayconstderexemptinynon-complexgasplantsthathavedestynthrouyh1mtsoflessthanlOmillionscfd(Ref.33.p.3-22)(c)RACTshouldapplyonlytocontatntngorcontactingaprocessstreamwithaVOCconcentrationof1.0percentbywetghtormore(Ref.33.p.4-2).·DoesnotapplytowetgasservtcerectprocattngcompressorsthatdonothaveaVOCcontroldevtce(Ref.33.p.4-2).

## REFERENCES

1.**Cont~ol** 

### of 

## Hydrocarbons**f~om** 

## Tank Truck**Gasol~ne Load~ng** **Te~~nals. ~?A-J50/2-77-026.**  

## U.S.**Env~~onmental** 

## Protection Agency,**Off~ce** 

## of**~~~ Jual~ty** **Plann~ng** 

## ana Standards. October 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-082. 2.**Cont~ol** 

## of**Volat~le Organ~c**  

## Emissions from Bulk**Gasol~ne** 

## Plants.**Ei>A-~50/2-77-035.** 

## U.S.**Env~:-onmental** 

## Protection Agency,**Off~ce** 

## of**A~~ Jual~ty** **Plann~ng** 

## and Standards. December 1977. OAOPS No. 1.2-085. 3.**Co:-~espondence.** 

# w. C. Barber,**D~:-ector,** 

## OAQPS, EPA, to Hon. L. Gudge·, House of**Rep:-esentat~ves.** 

## November 13, 1978.

, 

# -.**~egulator-y Gu~dance**  

## foro Cont:-ol of**Volat~le Organ~c**  

## Compound**f~om** 

## 15**Categor~es** 

## of Stationa:-y Sources. EPA-905/2-78-001.**Env~~onmental P:-otect~on**  

## Agency, Region V,**A~:-** 

## and HazardiOtJS**D~v~s~on.** 

## April 1978.**Em~ss~ons** 

# u.s.**Mater~a1s**


## 5. Memorandum. Richard G. Rhoads, Director, CPOO, EPA, to D·::-ector,**A~~** 

## anc Haza:-dous**Mater~als** 

## Division, Regions 1-X. Evaluation of 10,000**gals/mont~** 

## Th:-ougnput Exemptions for Petroleum Marketing**Operat~ons.** 

## August 17, :979. 5;·**Cont~ol** 

## of Volatile Organic Emissions from Storage of Peuoleum**L~qu~cs ~n** **F~xed-Roof** 

## Tanks. EPA-450/2-77-036. 

## u. S. Environmenul**Pr-otect~on** 

## Agency.**Off~ce** 

### of 

## Air Quality Planning and Standards. Dl!cember 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-089.

. 7. Memorandum. B. Polglase, Technical Guidance Section, EPA., to G. 1". 

## He1ms,**Ch~ef,** 

## Control Programs Operation Branch, EPA. Applicability of Fuel Storage Regulations to JP-4 Jet Fuel. December 23, 1981.


# a. Cont:-o 1 of Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems. Wastewater Separators and ?:-ocess Unit Turnarounds. EPA-450/2-77-025. U.S.**Env~:-onmental** 

## ;:>rotection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. October 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-081. 9.**Cont~ol** 

## of Volatile Organic Compounds from Use of Cutback Asphalt. E?A-450/2-77-037. U.S.**Env~:-onmental** 

## Protection Agency, Office of**~~r Oual~ty**  

## Planning and Standards. December 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-090. !0. 

## Memorandum. R. G. Rhoads,**Di~ector,** 

## CPOO, EPA, to**Di~ector, A~~**  

## ana**~azar1ous** 

## Materials Division, Regions 

## I-X. Cutback Asphalt VOC**Regulat~o,s.** 

## '1arch 6, 1979. ll. Memorandum. R. l'i. 

## Rhoads,**D~:-ector,** 

## CPOO, EPA, to Directc1r,**A~r** 

## ana Hazardous Materials Division, Regions 

## I-X. Cutback Asphalt

- Acceptaole RACT Regu;lation. Oecembe:- 19, 1978. 12.**Cont~ol** 

## of Volatile Organic Emissions fr-om Solvent Metal Cleaning. E?A-450/2-77-022. IJ.S. Envi:-onmental Protection Agency, Office of 

## Air Quality Planning and**Standa~ds. Novembe~**  

## 1977.

### 13.



# , 

# - 

# .

:;,.



### 16. Memorandum. R. G. Rhoads, Director, CPDD, EPA, to Director, Air ana Ha:ardous Materials Division, Regions 

## I-X. Exemption for Cola :leaner Degreasers. July 2, 1980. Memorandum. R. G. Rhoads, Director, CPDD, EPA, to Director, Air anc Ha:ardous Materials Division, Regions 

## I, III-X, and Director, 

## Environmental Programs Division, Region 

## II. Clarification of Degreasing Regulation Requirements. September 7, 1978. Control of Volatile Organic Emissions 

## from Existing Stationary Sources -volume 

### II: Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Faor·ics, Automo-**~iles,** 

### and Light-Duty Trucks. EPA-450/2-77-008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Stanaaras. May 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-07:3. Control 

## of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing -Volume 

### III: Surface Coating of Metal Furniture. 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Standards. December 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-086. Stationary Sources EPA-450/2-77-032. Quality Planning anc

17. Control 

## of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources

- Volume IV: Surface Coating 

## for Insulation of Magnet Wire. EPA-450/ 2-77-Q33. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office 

### o1f Air QualitJ Planning and Standards. December 1?77. OAQPS No. 1.2-08:7.
18. Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existiny Stationary Sources -Volume V: Surface Coating of Large Appliances. EPA 4510/2-77-034. ·· 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Plannin; and Standarcs. December 1977. OAQPS No. 1.2-088.

, Q


# ...

20.

21.

22.

23. Control of 

### Volatile Organic Leaks from 

### Petroleum Refinery Equipment.**E~A** 

### 450/2-78-036. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office 

## of**~ir** 

### Quality**~lanning** 

### and Standards. June 1978. OAQPS Net. 1.2-111.
Guidance to State and Local Agenchs in Preparing Regulations 

## :o Cont:-o; Volatile Organic Compounds from 

### Ten Stationary Source Cat:egories. E?A-450/2-79-Q04, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of**~ir** 

### Quality Planning and Standards. Septemoer 1979.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stati.onary SourcesVolume VI: Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Parts and Pr·oaucts.**E?~-** 

### 450/2-78-Q15. 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of**~ir** 

### Oua;i:y Planning and Standards. June 1978. OAQPS No. 1.2-101.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions 

## from Existing Statiionary SourcesVolume V,II: Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood Panelirtg. E?A-450/2- 78-032 •. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. June 1978. OAQPS No. 1.2-112.
Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture o1' Synthesi;:ed Pharmaceutical Products. EPA-450/2-78-029. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Qua 

### 1 i ty P 1 ann in g and Standa**ra~;.** 

### Decemoe r 19 ';' 3. OAOPS 

### No. 1.2-105.

## 25.

26.



# ,- _, 

# .

2S. Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of Pneuma:ic**~uooer** 

## Tires.**EPA-~50/2-73-030.** 

## U.S. Environmental Protect1on AgenCJ, Office of 

## Air Quality Planning and Standards. December 1978. OAOPS No. 

## 1.2-106. Control of 

## Volatile Organic Emissions from Petroleum Liauia Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks. EPA-450/2-78-047. U.S. Environmentai Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.**De~emce~** 

## 1973. OAQPS No. 1.2-116. Control of 

## Volatile Organic Compounds from Existing Stationary SourcesVolume 

## VIII: Graphic Arts- Rotogravure and Flexography. EPA-450/2- 76-033. 

# u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air QualitJ Planning ana Standards. DeceiTi:ler 1978. OAQPS No. 1.2-109. Control of 

## Volatile Organic Emissions from Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Systems: EPA-450/2-76-050. U.S. Environmental Protecti1:>n Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. December 1978. OAQPS No. 1.2-117. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank TrucKs ana Vapor Collection Systems. EPA-450/2-76-051. U.S. E.nvironmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.**De~emoe!"'** 

## 1978. OAQPS No. 1.2-119. 29. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyren'e Resins. E?A-450/3-83-008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. November 1983. 30.

31.



## 32.

..,.., 

## _



# .... Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Syntheti,c Organic Chemical ana Polymer Manufacturing Equipment. EPA-450/3-83-006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. March 1984. Control of 

## Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners. EPA-450/3-82-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. September 1982. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Inaustry.**E?.~-** 

## 450/3-a4-015. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DEcemoer 1984

. :ontr-ol of Volatile Organic Compound Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants. EPA-450/3-83-007. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December 1983.

### ATTACHMENT 2**E~~LE** 

### 5% RULE CALCULATION

### EXA~PLE 

## OF**A~ APPLICATIO~**  

## OF THE 5 PERCENT**EOUIVALE~CY** 

## RULE

State**"X~** 

## was in the process of developing volatile organic compounc ('v'OC) regulations for the "Netal Furniture" control technioue guideline ( CiG) category.**~n** 

## analysis of their emission inventory for their 

## ozone nonattainment area disclosed the following with regards to metal furniture plant potential emissions. ( 81: Overa 11 Control Efficil!ncy)
Pre-control Post Control Post Controi (Potential) ( CTG Allowable) (St. Rec. Al 1owa:.1e;
Plant .. A" 

## 100 t/yr 19 t/yr 1 9 

## t/yr Plant 

## .. B
.. 

# - 300 

## t/yr 

## 57 t/yr 

## 57 t/yr Plant 

## "C" 18.5 t/yr 3.5 t/yr 1 8. 

## 5 t/yr ?lant 

# ··o·· 80 t/yr 15.2 t/yr 1 5. 2 

## t/yr ?lant "E

.. 

## 90 t/yr 17.1 t/yr 1 7. 1 

## t/'lr

· . iota 1 588.5 t/yr ll 1. 8 t/yr 126. 

# c t/yr
7he cutpoi nt recommended by EPA for the meta 1 furniture· source category was a VOC emissions level of 10 tons per**yea~** 

## potential. The State was considering a cutpoint of 25 tons per year potential in order to provide relief to Plant "C". It was intended to show that with a 25 ton/yr cutoff. allowable emissions would be within 5 percent of potential emissions by applying a 10 ton/yr cutoff. An evaluation of the various plant potential emissions (assuming**9C~** 

## capture efficie.ncy and 90: control) indicated that post control (CTG) allowable VOC emissions (with a 10 ton. per year cutoff) would be lll.P. tons/yr. Post control allowable VOC 

## emissions (with the State's recommended 25 ton per year cutoff) would be 126.8 tons/yr. The difference in post control allowable emissions from the metal furniture source category would be 126.8- 111.8 

# = 15.0 tons/yr.
1 5 

# TTI.8 X 

### 1 

## oo. 

# = 13.4 percent Therefore, allowable emissions with a 25 tons per year cutoff would not be within 5 percent of allowable emissions with a 10 ton per year cutoff; thus, the**2~** 

## ton/yr cutoff would not be acceptable.

### ATTACHMENT 3

VOC CONVERSION CALCULATIONS: COATINGS

# VOC CONVERSION CALCULATIONS: 

# COATINGS

OZONE AND CO PROGRAMS BRANCH

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

## & STANOARCIS FEBRUARY, 1988·

•

I**-~-**tCOMPAHISONOFVOCREGULATIONFORMATS#VOC/GALCOATINGvs#VOC/GALSOLIDSEXAMPLECONVERSIONGI\/EI!:•.:-.·,::..·,-,;'.u.-;/!VOC/GALCOATING(LESSWATER);J: .:...:!II.. - -7.36#VOCIGALrhl--:,L:-...::.-.··-:::TO---#VOC/GALSOLIDS.STEP#1--WHAT'SVOLUMEOfVOCIN1.GALOfCOATING?3.06VOC•1GALVOC::::0.408GALVOCGALCOAT7.36#VOC·GALCOATINGSTEP#2--WHAT'STHEVOLOFSOLIDSIN1GALCOATING?1GALCOATING-VOLVOC==VOLSOLIDS1-0.408=0.592GALSOLIDSSTEP#3--HOWMANYGALOfCOATINGDOESITTA.KETOGElAGALOfSOLIDS?(INVERSEOfSTEP#2)i=i.669GALCOATiNG0.592GALSOLIDSGALSOLIDSSTEP#4--CONVERT3.0#VOC/GALCOATINGTO#VOC/GALSOLIDS•__GALCOAT·=:5.07_8VOC·GALCOATGALSOLIDSGALSOLIDSI·'.....IL/t;;\I::IIIVOC/C,'\1C.'r.ttflUS2/1/88-------·-----·-rOFVOCREGULA.TIONFORMA1,S#VOC/GALCOATINGvs#VOC/GALSOLIDSc:a::l13..rn::l0rnl!J"u0>==It::35II30I'I25I2015JFORDENSITY=7.3B#1050t-IIIII...-._•.---------1IIIIII,,,,,,,1I10123/'///_,.-/IIIIIIIIIIIII4///5#VOC/GALOFCOATING{LESSWATER)6.---OZONE/COBRANCUG.T.UEUAS12/24/87niAIIl81lU01•'---·--------**=~OGR~M** 

## TO COVVERT**•vOC.'G~L** 

## OF**CO~TING** 

## TO •vOC!GAL SOLIDS**~** 

## #VQC/•SOLIDS

1 • (• 

## l.: 1.4 l. Q 

# La 

# :. •)



# ... 

# - :.4

.... 

# -·= :.s
-· 

# .....

-··- ::.4 

# ::.o ::.a



# ... •) 

# 4.: 4.4 

# 4.e 4.8**~-** •)**~-~**

### ~-= C"

- 

# ... .' 

### 5.3 5.9 Q. 

### •:J 6. 1

e.
- : 

# ....



# - - 

# -. 

# -**~.** 

# =



# - . -:"



# - - 

# ....

. i 

# -**#VOC~G~L** 

## SOLIDS


# 1.: 1.4 1.7

:. t) 

# ::.4



# ... 

# -
-• I ::. 1 

### 4.(1**4.~ ~.1** **~.7** 

# =

.. :. 7. t) 

### 7.9 

# e. a 9.8 1(1.9 

# 1::.e**15.~** 

### :1.9



# ... - -..J·

. .;. :i.4**=~.i**

-... C"

-·-· ...J**:.~.e** 

## -+::.7**4~.** l**.:=::.~** 

# - ... -: 

# =-·=.**~** 1 .1. 

## <·. -+ i.

.. ::. i

-··· 1 •



## -. 

# -·-------- 

# ·----------···-------- --.::._.,
.. £: 

## :"•JC**!:IErlSIT~** 

# = 7.:::=**#')QC:G~L** 

### 50LI05**DEN~ITf ~** **1c:~.0 ~~G~L**  

## #VOC / •SOL I 

## l:·S

(•. 1 .: •. ! (1. 

### 1
·:·. ! (•. 1 

## •).:



# . ... 

## '·'•- •).: ,:, 

# . :: t). :: 

# (•.:. •). 4 t). 

### 4 

### (1.4 t).**~** 

### •). 5 (I.e, (1. 

### 7 1). 

# a t). 

### 9 1. (• 1.4 

### 1. 5 l.Q 1.'7 1.0

... ...

... 

# ... 

# -· 

# -· :.':



# - , -· 

# ..

. = 

# -. -· 4 .·. 

## ·+.-**~-=**



### ::. 

## ·.·

### :**=E:~ ::;:.c~;:,.::.,.,**  

### C.4Ll-Er• "SCoLIDC.:tLCUL..:.TE" : :- =.E"" =!=•::'GF

. .4M TO**C~LCULATE** 1 

### 10C !·: 

### 50LII:·S
:::**:....~;,I** 

### J\iT

.. 

## =.:**!'J~** '- 1..i=.;!NT"


### ,-**~,..FF.INT** 

### " FROGRAM TO CONIJERT t.VOC/GAL OF COATING TIJ" •vOC/GAL 50LIOS**~ •vOCt.SOLIOS":LPF:NT:LF~!N7** **~tVQCtG~L** 

### COATING !tVOCtGAL SOLIDS •'IOC.''IitSOL!DS"**~,..::::;I** 

### NT "----------------------------------- i_FI:;;INT 

## :.•.' F·:·::.**w.=~ ~o**  

### 5 

### STEF· 

## .2**-·~··.·** 

# == l-··**:...?SOL=~NS/lCI'**



# -

..**~EM ~F~!NT**  

### USING FORMAT**P~INTS** 

### OUT**~NSWERS** 

### WITH ONE**~EM ~L50** **S~** 

### IPS SFACES PER ALL THE •••••••••••••·;**~EM** 

### SEE PAGE**7-1~7** 

### OF**GW-~ASIC** 

### MANUAL**~F~INT** 

### USING**"••••••••••••••·•":X:ANS:L~SOL** 

### NE**~(** T X



## : ::.:H) W= 1 I : l.;.,>(•**..:.~S=** 

### '( •W**:~:5** 

### REM**DENS!~~** 

### OF SOLIDS IS**1~ ~VOC/GAL**  

## :.1::·:, l-E50L=AN;/1.:,'**~** 

## ':: ·>·> :..:=:; 

### II'JT usING II

................. II: .(:AN$: 

### i__E.SOL 

# ·-=

! 

## :•:u:>**~,..;::!=:!NT:** 

### !..F F: 

### I 

### NT: LF·R I 

### NT "



# --------------------------------------------------------- :;·:-:.**:..=:::NT:LF~!NT** 

### " !=5<· 

### t_:=c::!'JT"**-~:.** 

### ASSUMES VOC DENSIT¥ =**~.:=** 

### •vOC/GAL" SOLIDS DENSITY= 1=.(1 

### •IGAL"



# -

### ATTACHMENT 4

TEST METHODS OR PROCEDURES FOR GROUP·I, II, AND III CTG'S#/\111\UIHINfIllHIM11IIUIHJIAI(I(ytfYI.Lif,t.I'A/111\Iji'S,\l.l'llMIIIU1'1,I'JIIIJr_y__________________Cans,Coils,fabric,andAutomobilesandliyht-OutyTrucksMetaIfurnitureHayneticWireCoatinylaAvvIianeeTdhlcITlSIMllllliUSUltPIWUUUitlS•UHliiWUPIClliCTGUocumentt•umberApplIcableControlOptionslowsolventcoattnysAdd-onllowsolventcoatinysAdd-on1Add-onllowsolventMll-onJRecummer11JetlMethod(s)dOllUocument(s)CitiTest11ethull11etholl24,40lfRPartbOr-tethod40t:fMPartbOormethodsin"MeasurementorYoIatiIeOryantcCompounds."EPA(CTGtoMethod24.40CFMPart6UMethod40CFMPart6Uormethodsin"MeasurementofVolatileUryanicCompounds."EPA11etllod40UMPart6Uormethodsin"MeasurementotVolatileCompounds,"EPA(CHiPI'·Method24,40ClRPartbtlMethotl4llURPartbllormethodsin"MeasurementotVoldtilellry.tllict:un.wunds,"U'A4-/ll-041Uuc.umeut11dyUeOrderedfromGPU7GPUIrn1s2UJISlGP07GP07NTIS2liPU7NTISlNTISlGPo7lil'll'IHI')/

## ... 

# - --
- 

# -

.r.



# - -



# -

- •J" 

## = 

# = =



# a.**-~** 

# -

...:- 

# -

. ::.::



# -


# - 

# - .=-



# -

-

. 

# -- =--· <:**~:**



# - .- 

# -

< J'l**~':'.I** 

# = J't



# ... 

# - ::- 

## .-:f 

# "'



# - 

# -· : J't

### ~ 

# e 

# -



# = = ....**-~ ~::::**  • :1 

# = 1.,1 

### ..= 

# = <



## .... :-.. 

# ==-



# - 

# -**~ ~**  :"1..1 

# = I 

# - -

.,.**~** 

# - ! •· 

# - 

# - - - ..**£~** 

# "' 

# ·- Ill



# ....... "' :1 

# -.,. 

# - -
='- 

# - 

# .. 

# -- ·-

.-: 

### ....... 

# ... .,. .... ••• :.1 

### ,:., c.,.:
..

### !.---~ 

# ·- :.: "': 

# .., 

# ;.: 

# .: .:

_., ,..., 

# - I 

# - - I :-.a ::::::-



# ..

I 

### <



# -
....



# -



# - =

= 

# ·- ... ',j

### ~ Ill**=~** -I 

# ..., 

# -·- -·-


# - ·-;.,)



## .... 

# =""

-**~** :"II. 

# =-**;~**

... "1:1 

### c:

### ~**~** I 11'1 

# ·- .,.

, :1
*'til -:,.,
- "1:1

....**~- ~**  :1

-

### 5~~



# -=-

# t~ 

# -- =

:-.a I**·~**



# .. 

# -

_.,



# - - - _, ..r.;:.:
... 

# -

... "'



# - -**~** 

# = .: 

# ·-**~-­** 

# ·= , - ... =-· - 

# =**~ ~**  '=

## .~



# ... 

# - ... 

# - :.: "':

## ~·=~**!~-** 

# =-**~** 

# - -


# - - I :-.a ::::::- 

### ,; 

# .. I

### ~ 

# -

- - = =

I 

# -

-


# -

= 

# =



# -/' 

# - = •



# - ii >. -**.::~**



# = ="



# - :f._,



# -- ._,=·**-=~;** ; 

# - ii 

### i 

# - ""· 

# -·· 

# -

:.-

i: 

# =-- < 

# =· '-'**~** 

# - 

# = •



# --

- ... 

# - -· ;

..,.; 

# a:



# -**~** 

# = i



# - - ::



# .... 

# -

.... 

# = -

I**~** 

# - "'**~"'** 

### ::z.,.**~**



# . ..., "' Q

### !~**~** 

# ::-=**:J'I~ ~** 



# -**="~~'** 

# =**~** 

# -==**~~..,** 

# -**~** 

# - =**~ ~**  

## :t 

# :r '- 

# .,= = 

# =**~** -:J-.l '..J**~·­** 

# - >:i- 

# - 

# - -



# - -·



# - -

- ·-



# - ..., 

# = I 

# - - I :'\.1 

## ::::- J=i**~**

I

### ~ 

# .... /1 

### c



# - - % ·-:; .J'I 

### <



## .... 

# =

.1'1 

## ,...,

I 

## ....,



## ...., ....,

I 

# ....,_ I 

# ·- <'"'lQ**~­** 

## ,..., 

# -

• I 

# =-- c. "='

### ~~~ c.; ·-"" 

# =

·- .- :.r !:.. -' "= '- 

# ·- , '- 

# = '-'**~** 

# =-·-**~** 1.1**--~=** 

# ._, -;.,



# - <



# -



# - 

# - -

.... 

# - 'o:l



# = "t:**~ (,.,)~** **~** 

# - - - - I 

### -:**~** "='

- 

### <<

### _..,



# -



# -

= =**~** 

## ,._ 

## ::: ..::i :..



# - -

-:'I



# - -

- oJ :.1 :1: -.l**~i** 

# - ..-..::: 

# - ..,. .-: 

## --= ...... :.1• 

# f**~** 2:. 

### i ; -::. 

# -**~** :.:· ..; ..; 

# -



# --

- 

# -- :.E :._. 

### <**~· ~·** **~** 

# = 

# .. -=

- -· 

# -

:=: 

# ·-



# -



# - =

... - =

... ., :1: =-:'I 

# ..,. = 

# =

.:;



# - -

::oo.- :.. 

## ., :;. 

# =**~** 

# ·- ':.; 

# -

....**:.~-**

# ~ 

# .:

= :-... 

### _ ... 

# _

-



# - 

# -



# -

-



# =**-=~** •..:

### =-~ 

# -x



# -
...

_.,



# - - I 

# - 

# -

_..,. '":oJ : I..**:..;~** \,1- -:**~** 

# -
...**~** 

# ..**;:;~** 

# -

:=:



# -

- : 

### ' 

# ··-

< :"\,



# --- 

# =-

= 

# -· :"1..1 I 

# J'l



# ·= :._. 

# -
.. -:a:



# -**~**



# - = 

# -

_. 

# - - :.1 "' >:'I



# -- 

# - Vi

:"1..1 

# ..., 

# - I


# - ,:::::

I :"1..1 ::::::- 

### :::; o:r

I 

### <**~** 

# ...



# - Q

### ~ 

# ·- 

# - ":: e::-,**~** 

# - :.1

### ~**~ ~~**  

### v;- 

# ::oo.::**~** lC 

# =- 

# -**~** '.J- -o
.... 

# -

-
- -



# - j :"\,



## ..... 

# =



# -**~** I 

# -

-

-**~** :.1

### ~ 

# -
-o 

# =



# - _. 

# ...**~** 

# = I.. :1 

# .., 

# - :I:Q

:"I N



# - 

# - I 

# - 

# - I ="'

# ~ o:r

I

### ~ ...ool 

# - -



# -

:=:



## ..... (,;



# - - ...

g

I 

# - 

# - - < 

# - -



# -

= ·..c



# = 

# - u



# - -**~** J'l N



# -



# - -
- 

# -**·~** 

### ::



# = 

# = I 

# - 

# - <

:.. I..


# -



# -**~** :.1 

# .. 

# - 

# - -



# - 

# - - 

# -

- - .::1



# = 

# - (,; 

# = o:r


# • N



# -


# - -

oJ 

## .... 

# = .•. :.1 > ••



### .;;



# - .;, 

# .. ::"1 

# ! -·

'7



# - - 

# - I 

### :-... 

# - = _., o:r

I

### ~ ...ool



# "' 

# - I.. 

### <

# ~: -.:11 l..J :.,**=~** 

### .:= •: 

# t**~I**

### ~ 

# -

-



# -

- 

# - .::1



# - o:r



# _., :"1..1



# - 

# -
- - 

# - 

# -

I J'l



# ... 

# -

:"1 

# =



# - : 

# -**-~**



# -**~** I



# - 

# - I ="' 

## ::::-



# - 

# -**~** I

### ~

Jl 

# """ c '0 

# -
Q



# - -

....



# ... • 

# =



# - ·-



# - 

# -

.. ai

..:



# - - 

# - = 

# - <



# =

:.

.::

..:



# - IJt ...0:

### ~ :... 

# -**~ ~** **:-~** :::.., 

# .. 

# - I r..


# ...**~** 

# - -=· ,;;:; 

# -·**-~** 

# -·



# - 

# -

# -**~**



# - - = ; ::0.. 

# - 

# - .: 

# -

: 

# - :"., 

# -

. 

# - 

# - - 

# -

- -**~** 

# -

- ·-**~** 

# ·-



# - 

# -**~** 

# =**~**

.1 '- :'1 Q 

# -



# - : 

### --= 

# ... 

# . . . :.1



# - - 

# = - _., 

# ... 

# - 

# - "' 

# -**~** I,Q I,Q**~** 

# .,



# - - 

# - ... '- r...n '- '- '- 

# = S"



# - :. :"1.; 

# ;:.**~** 

# •**~** 

# • .:1. 

# =- '-



# - - - =- < 

# = 

# - = 

# - = 

# - = 

# - - - ;-


# - - - 

# -



# - 

# - - 

# - c..: 

# - c..: 

# - <



# .. :. 

# _., oJt 

# = : 

# - ; 

# - % 

# = 2:**~** 

### < 

# -

- ... 

# ... 

# ... ... 

# ·- 

# - :f.._



# --- :: "" =· "':


### ....... :, :
..... %



# - = _.. 

# ... 

# - • i ::**.~ .~**  

# .,



# -



# - - ·- 

# - 

# - :.1 :.1



# - 

# - • E :'1

### ~

### ~**~** 

# - c: 

# a 

# -**~** 

# -· = 

# = • 

# ·- •



# - '- 

### c: '- 

# - - -

-· 

# - Q :.1 

# ... Q 

# .. 

# -



# - 

# - 'a 

# - 1..1 

# - -**~** 

# - - = = 

# - .... 

# .., 

# =**~** c: Q



# ... '- I 

# ·- c:·- I 

# < 

# -**~** 

# .., "' :i 

# •**~** "1\1 

# -**~:** 

# - -· ,;: 

# = 2: 

# = :: 

# :i

.....**~** 

# - 

# -· 

# - -· -

..... 

# - :.:

..... 

# - =\ ="' .r 

# •. = 

# -



# - ;II 

# "'



# - 

# - .::l 

# -**~: ~**  

### ,..., '- 

# - g 

# -· I 

# = - -· 

# - 

# -

- -= :"\,; I I ' 

# -· ::.1 ii 

# .., .., :-'I I 

# = = = "' ·'



# . .: ,_, I I I 

## "" JO 

## ::::- :-'I 

### ,..., :-'I


# ·- 

# - ::::- 

# - .:::; 

## ::::- 

## ::::- .::; 

## .::; .::; 

# .... 

# - 1..; ::.1 

# ... = 

# :. I 

# .. .. .. -· = -,**~** I I I**~I** 

### <

### ~

### ~**~'** 

# ·- :51 

### ...... Q, 

# -· 

# - loW**~** 1.1.1 I..: c..:

:; 

# a I 

### ::; I**~** 

# "' :::00. '- 

# -



# - 

# - - =- :::00. 

# - 

# - - Q '- 

# - - ! 

# ., "1\1 Q, 

# - J'l "1\1 

# - :] 

# - :.1 

# - ::0.. :::00. 

### :.a 

# c 

# - > 

### c: :::..- 

# - 

# - -**~** 

# ::.**~** 

# - a ., a' 

# ... :.1**~** 

# ...**~** 

# ·- , '- 

# ... ::"1



# - .,**~** :'1 

# = 

# - :.a 

# - •II '- >. 

# - :.1 1.1'1 

# = 

# -**~** 

# - :: '-· ::. 

# ... 

# .... 1..1 :.1 

# - <



# - - "1\1 ::.1 I 

# ., 

# - ... "' :.1 

# ; 1..1 

### .=::o..

### ~ 

## ..,., 

# -· :'1 ?"' 

# = x- 

# =**="~** 

## ;:.; 

# =· '- 

# - 

# - '- ;.;- 

# = 

# ·- ... :.a 

# :5 

# -· -:: 

# - "1\1**~** :;) "1\1 

# = ::.1 

# -
- ....,; 

### z: 

# "" 

# = ::• .r.**-~~**..,; 

# - - - 

# - =-

**~** 

# -

.:::.



# -

-



# - -·



# -

...



# - -=



# -

...



# -

**~**



# - .:



# -

- 

# - -= 

# ...

·...;



# -


# - I 

# - < 

# - -

-

..



# - ;:

**~** 

# ·-



# -
-
= 

# - 

# - - =



# - =

- 

# -- 

# - =

**~** 

## =



# - 

# -- '-



### ~ :,



## - =- 

# l-
=-

**=~** 

# .. 

# -

**=~**

**~!'.It** 

### .... 

# = <- 

# -==-

**~-** 

# -- -

**~** :I



# .. 

# ·- -=-

**~-l** 

# --

**~** 

# . 

# - :"... 

### .. 

### ::; 

# .. 

# -
=

:'1:.1 

# =- 

# --

- - ,_ :: 

# !



# ·- . • _-s 

# ·= ......

... ="



# - 

# ·- -:

'.J

. ,_ 

# ··-

**-~>** 1:-

- 

# -

**~** 

# =

**~_.,**



### ~ 

## :S 

# = < - 

# - = =

**~** 

# .: :, 

# -

..... **~** 

# =



# - =



# ...

..... 

### !!

**~** 

# = 

# - >. 

# - -

. !



# - =



# . .r. >. 

# - -· , 

# -

i



# .., 

# - :z::



# = 

# ..

**~** 

# -

- -


# --

:. 

# - ,.,_


# --- 

# ---
-

**·~** 

# ..... :-.=



# ... 

# -

**~**



### :z:: < 

# . 

# - 

# = '="'



# . 

# -

- :1 

# =- 

# =



# -= :I_.., 

# ....,_ ·-N



### - ·..=

·- • ..=

**=u~**

**·~** 

### <Z :.



# .... = 

# - = !

.... 

# - =



# - - = = 

# ... !'


# ·-

-=· :a_



# - 

# ·= :..



# ·- = 

# ·- ... 

# - 

# -- ===

**~** 

## --:: -::_ Zi 

# i

**~** 

# -

**~**

**~-­** :, > > 

# = :!-



# • = 

# =-



# .... "'

..... 

# ... :.;

**~~** 

# i

**-~** .j-



# -- =s



# - =-

•


# ... = ':lVI "= 

# = 

# = 

# = «:.1·- 

# -

... =.., 

# ·--

**~** 

# = :.: :-a

**=-~** 

# -- ,;:;-



# .., 

# .

**~** 

# =

**~**

**~~**

- ':.1 

# -

- .e·:

**~~**



# - =

**·~** 

# -· . 

# - - 

# - -

= '...J



# - 

# - 

# ..

- -



# -

**~** 

# = 

# -

..... 

# =



# - j



# ...

**~** !!



# ... V'l ':I 

# - •"I"I)('.,,,r:"'...L,.,'II••ou()=-L.,VItfr:,.•1•:s:"Ill"'I.nour"'Lno.,ftJ,,.VIn"'•I.,,,,"'I...,.."·'I•:o•I...no\1L:•C'Vl:--.L..,c0••"I...•nLr)'IVI"'tilL.,,..,I.,_.,..._,.,:--1,....:c:"'>("'0C'n'll1:n"'f)Ul..,,.,....'IIv,,"I,...."'e.,,r·••>:"''II..'-....:J'-0Q"l\Vl••:--..L••"',,,c0L"'t-IQ"10I.JIIVlUnL'J....en'""'.,,"''1)Ill•.,LOVIY.;-.......LOl,_•t....,•JlI'\1......•11()111L-......l.IJc..,"'.."',_,;)nr:."otJL•nr,•r...,II'"'...,"'II'•no••"'"..'·'.._·-·Ille='0>uc'":--.._.·-,,u .0Y..,...GIU:--c:ftltiiO..,'l.I?--tUQ"''"tJVl"Y•••c,().r:·tC'.."'ouoc:1.,_It:.,"'f)IJtJ"'..f10II..rII.••"':-...,I'\Jn..,uc..,VIftln.....n.c0>::ll0.._.ctftlsOM:--oomVIrf..,,.,rrt,._.....f')It•,Illc:'JIUUI.._:-3VI('I"',,IllUl7,.,t"l•••J(1(IllILL...<T),.,•(c-i.,I)c .••'";:••II'",.""'..,,.,EttI...."I'..,fY,.,Jr'"0••IL"'Ill........-til,.._,•J•:1VI•1'..,,.,·tIJfhIll":lit'...,.,r:fY.,,,··-··-fiJf')·tr:,,til·-...,,"'..c"'....rftl•tlf'IIr·(:..on..,,,III...,."'1•1•ttI'...,,;It......''I''.....,,......."''·''n-"'.,,.,n·...Itn_lll·Il.'(I....,.."'F.0:iu·-0OL:-n"c,.,_.Ill:--.n••:1·r·I-"(.'1•t·-""'.,:--·-,VI"'"('1.._..,...,IIlJC"'"'.,'Vlll'l··-'>'".."C)•r·f":)u"IL,.Qr'""--I)•UM....,•Jt'lJIJt)tIltil•I'III•I,,r.II'"II•••1'\IIf)..Ill"'••":JtJt::"'"'"'f"\.n...,eVlc"'cu..,..,exi:Jf"'l.-IX'.....,,IllE•I-·-"'n:-Lf\1.,0000CJ..u(},,·-cUl"',,r,'lJcol-•·-:-3YIllII.••I......:=.'(I('I•III•I'•III."'.1u.,.0....Lrt,,r:....._;r(til"'"'">(...cftl"':--..)C0"''3)C0)Cnoc:cIll00.OQ.._•(..,C..I0.._,,.0-,..cr,,_"'u...t110........"'I;I••rr:,_,,"'--"'IllI.If..,to"I;"Of:;(')...,.,.h.II.)-·"'ll'"'"'I!JIJ......Vlc..C'Ill..,cf')(..)a•L:1••"'='.:.._'-'c0.II-t;..,r·wruc:"'...II.-,ftt•III•1.·I.:III'••Ill::"..Il.Illn,,IUt:"I.cc..•i.""i"'1.!1:-.n,.,uc::ll0n..-ij1.1uc..,,..,c''""L•h...,·•"'.,....0·-·...IllI..,"'•:1IJQ...'nuC">!_t--.,II•J"',.,c:"'·r--·rn•...,..,.,,...,,(I..,•I••'lI••...l'..I..flIll:J....I•I'!II}•uI'f')'Y....'f)·t"'l(...Ill_,tJc::Jc•o.EI)uu·-c..,(n.._,..,"'II..,Q:--...0c0.."'I.rf\1r·1ItC(1•••(11'"·-·"III•••,.II•:<'I•II,,.II'I•••"•nIll".._:J01/1t·"'r.0w......,,F.(1.._..-VIuc..,c..n.._,.,0•.,._uoIQCX)C!l>ftl•••U10..,......:t:Of'1-cn.:1.,c0..."'"',..._r:n•-....f--.:n1ILIt"''"•t1'1•'Itl..I..•II"'•••r:If.",•.)("•{JItt·.."'"'J'uIll•(Cl•I'J,,•v("...,.."''·t:(..)pt.I';J....."'...Ill"'U>'1:C'......,.,c:r)ftl,_,pc"'oul)"'··-.._.._"'::ll"en.,..,._,.0IllIll·-u.....wovo--.,,0-wc...tl>o--1110-uate"'"'r:t:?"'Ql0nt'l·II'I..f)I',.'"l'Ill"f,,.t:...r:,_n..._0:•,I'tilc"'(.:1uc.-.:"')(.........cuovc..,.,en00.u.-.:LGIOP\0.,...x::EU..uftl.-0·-llllf...,..,Ill00>:--r:.......•'oouI}cl.J0.-u..,Ill..,..,cour:Ill••0IVCt'l"'•("''''I(I'·'I'•••IIl'I.,,fIL"IIIVI..Itilr:uIll'"I",,,.,c..,"'Lr'\"'c"'c:...Illf?"'::ll(I1\'"'..,CJ"'.(,_,0)(,_tJ...c,...,ac'.10r(II'ISOc:.,rr.:nlIJ••·J•CLf '·t...,,,\I1.'r..,,,,.'"l'...It...lhr:,,'"c0..,,.,...('('...1•,,...c"'..,...C.-of')t.tI'IllU:JUlc::ll"'r1:0>L•OUl0>Ill.,,::llr---OMcu"'n:..,··-n)-rt..,L'C1L'-Illt-1"-:--,"'c c0•C:·-wr:ovoc.........r;::nl••c...Q.-..'.(...1'1"..t:••111,Il"'fl•II(Jr0Oil(J>1:,,=Icf•t0(1}(1tw...,_...c:"'I.JcnL'..."'.-·,,"'il.u•(c..,..."'0>Len0••Ill::ll"'..,1..!1..,...0t-,.,rn'IL-:f.._01,.,•0....c'(').(cl.l0••......_....."'I.c:··-cf'II......:--.,...,..til•O...'"II..r:,.Ill:c(,,r:Ill'J'of!..,I;-,til="',....··-1\)-·..,......r:Jftl<nc.....OvtIll::ll..,U>1'1:J··-n,..._"'.,,.,..,.ftlr·-l:r'l..r.rr:tl>h•...,_")·t.._0UOIOilVI".•.I-.._:1c:'1r>u.."'..--"'Ic........_[...:'"f\1'"...."'.,...(1(\·-·f'll'IJ...,,iI

### ATTACHMENT 5**I~DEX** 

### TO EPA GUIDANCE MEMORANDUMS AND POLICIES**l~I Upea~ee**  

## - l/13/Ec

INDEX

l. 7_!08/'ii 

### Rec:crmended Policy on Control 42 

## FR 353:3 \..- of Volatile Organic Compounds
2. 

### S/01/ii Recamended Policy on Control 42 :R 

### 38931 of Volatile Organic Ccmpcunds, Correction
3. l/03/78 Attaiment/Nonattaiment

- Status Designations Hawkins


## 4. 2/02/78 IJ'I'9lem!ntation of RAC'l' on Rydroc:arbon Hawkins Stationary Sources 

## 5. 2/24/78 c:-i teria for Approval of 

### 1979 SIP**~vision:s** 

### ACminist:at::::-

6. 3!16/iS txample Demonstration of Attainment for Rhoads 

### Photochemical Oxidants 

# '· 4/03/78**~tage** 

### I Vapor**~ec:overy** 

### - Bulk Plants Bar!:le:-


# s. 4/28/iS Development of Regulations for HC RACr 

### from Ba:-!:le:- 

### erG's
9. 5!19/78 criteria for Prcposing Approval of 

### Revision**~3** 

## :R 21673 to Plans for Nonattainment Areas


### 10. 6/05/78**~.Jla** 

### tions for HC Sa.arces Covered 

## bJ C'l'Gs Helms


## 11. 6!13/78 Application of RACT to Point Sa.arces of 

# vo: Neligan in Rural Areas
12. 6/30/78 Vapor Recovery Regulations Required to Meet 

## Rhoaes RACI' Requi.reftl!nts for the 

### 1979 SIP


### 13. 7/03/78 Internal Offsets for RAcr 

### Categories Hawkins 

## 14. 7/l.0/78 Procedures 

### for ,.._asurin; Volatile Or9anic 

## Rhoads Caqx:unds


### 15. 8/04/78 Requirenent for VOC RACT Regulations in all Hawkins Oxidant Nonattainrrent Areas


### 16. 8/16/78 Clarification of 

### Attainment/Nonattainment 

## Rhoaes evaluation G.aidance 

## 17. 8/23/78 Oxidant Standard Hawkins
lB. 

### 8/24/78. Clarification of EPA Policy on Emissions cf 'Barber Methyl Chlorofo:m 

### 19. 9/0i/78 Clarification of Oegreasing Regulation Rhoads 

### Requirements



# -- 20. 9/11/78 Continuity of 

### SIP Regulations Hawkins



# - -10:.:<..

# .,_.
_

.........



# .,, 9/lS,**'i~ Cat~orical** **~liance** 

### Schedules for VOC :Sourees Rasnic 

# -··

.,., 9/29/78 Va;:cr**~co.rery** 

### !"2edn; CU!stions 

# --· " 23. 

### 10/06/18 Caftnents on Auto Industry Prc:posals Rhoaes



# ... 10.'12/78 Unclassi!ied Counties with Si;nificant**~=** 

### Hawk.ins



# ......**~int** 

### Sotrce E:nis.4Sions
25. 10/26/78 O:one Trans;:crt Values fer SIP**~isions** 

### Bar::er
26. 10/26/78 D!finition Clf 

### Volatile Or;anic 

### Car;x::unds Hell'S


### :2i. 10/27/78 Olcidant Standard WoJ:k 

### GrOJp Meeting on 10/19/78 Hei:n


### 28. ll/03/78 \blatile Or;anic CaPp:unds Emissions InveJ,tory Bart:er
29. 1l/03/i8 Cata:;;orical Canpliance Schedule for 

# vee Sc:urces Baeer
30. 

### 11/09!78 Clarification Clf 

### Paper Coating Definition for Rhoads VU: 

### Scurces 

# 3:. 11/13/18 \oeste Ois;:osal Jte;ulations for vtJC 

### Calc:a;ni
32. ll/l3/7t! Clarification Clf 

### REP for OJCidant Control Barber 

### Strategies
33. 

### ll/16/78 \blatile Organic**~und** 

### !)nissions**~c1~icns** 

### Bar:er at Qo1 

### 34. ll/21/78 MCl'**~tions** 

### for Can Coating**~rations** 

## Rhoads
35. 12/07/78 Se1ec::.ion Clf 

# Ox Cesi;n Value Rhoads


### 36. 12/19/78 OJt!:>ac:k 

### Asphalt

- AcceptAble RAC'I'**~at:ion** 

### Rhoads 

## 3i. 12/20/78 Availability of End Seal C:mpounds for**Cal~** 

### Helms 

### Manufacturin; Operations
38. 

### 12/21/78**~asona!:lle** 

### f\Jrther Pro;ress**Rec;ui~nts** 

### :Eor .larles Areas with**~fficult** 

### Oxidant Problems 39. 12/22/78 Jequest · for Res;:cnse to Prc::posed**~ianc::e ~n**  

### Scnedules l:rj 

### the New 

### En;land States fer Coordinated Air Use**Ma~ernent (N~)**  

### 40. 

### 12/29/78 iSO and NSR SIP Revision SJ.tmittals Hc::trt\an 

## -41. l/16/79 Continuity of SIP Regulations

-**~vised** 

### Hawk.ins 

### Enclosure 42. 1/16/79 New 

### England States fQr Coordinated Air Usa 

### Rhoac4.s 

### Managanent (NESCAlt1) CO"'''pliance Prc:lgram fl:% 

# vu:
-fC<:... 

# - Sources
43. 

### 1/25179 Consistency in VDC Regulations HelJ'IS

# .. 

# _ .. ,).,..., 

# ..



# .. 2/2l/i9**D!te~ination** 

### of**~uctions** 

### Necessary to**Jl~ttain** 

### P!ioa:s 

# ..... the Ozone Standard
45. 3/06/79 Regulation of 

### Methyl Ollorofor"'' 

## (1, 1, 1, Baeer 

### Tricholoroet!"\ane) and Methyl OUoride.
46. 

### 3/06179**OJ~ac:k** 

### Asphalt 

# vue Re;ulations R.'"loac:s**4~.** 

### 3/15179 OJestions and Answers on \lUC**~lations** 

### Pol;.lase
48. 

### 4/04/79 State Jr!lpletent.ation Plans; General Prumble 44 FR 20372 for Pro;x:sed Rul 

### emski n; on ,tpproval of 

### Plan**~visions** 

### for Nonattainnent Areas
49. 4/13/79 Fabric Coat.in; E)nission t.iJni 

### ts Hel.'TS


# so. S/Ol/79 Letter to 

### 3M on Bubblin; Rhoad.c;


### 5!. S/03179 Paper CoatinQ !)tlission LlJtoli t.s Hel"":".S
5:2. 

### 5/04/79 Need 

### for enission Offsets in 1\Jral 03 Non- 

### R'loa<is at.tainrtent Areas
53. 5/16/79 Need 

### for 1\Jral. !Nssion Offset. in**~prCM!d Rhoa~s**  

### State Plans
54. S/lB/79 IJ9\plt!"'ent.ation of 

### Rfi> Requira.nts**Ra~r** 

## !5. S/21/79 Ik'aft.**Lan;UA~e** 

### - Pre.bles for SIP Prt:p:)Sals Rhoads and Approvals
Sfi. 

### S/24/79 ENaluat.ion of RAC'l' 

### for an Autawcbile Assen.ioly Rhoat1s**P.r~** 

### Coating Operation 57. 5/25179 9.1..,tnission of 

### State Air Pemits as SIP**~visions** 

### R."loa.:!s 

# sa. 6/04/79 Air OJali 

### ty: Clarification of Agency Policy 44 FR 3204.2 Concernin.; 02one SIP Revisions and Sol 

### vent Reac:t.ivi ties 59. 6/15179 Baseline Transfer Efficiency for Spray App;Lica- \·lalsn tion 

## c::t W.ter-t:crne Auta10tive Coatings 60. 6/20/79 f't:)difications to 

### Recorutendations for Solve1,t**Rho~s** 

### Metal Cleaning
61. 7/03/79 I 

### Apprcpriate Transfer Efficiency for -water.::crne Rl')oads Equivalence•
62. B/17!79 ENaluation of 

### 10,000 gals/month throughout Rhoads 

### Exerptions for Petrole\11'1 P'arketin; CP!ratic::ns



# -- 63. 

### B/17/79 S\**~nstration** 

### Rhoads



# - -""<-

### 65.

66.



### 6i.

68.
69.


### 70.



# n.

73.

i '·



### 75.

76.
77.

iS.


### i9.


# so.
Sl.
82.


### 83.

84.**S/~2179**



### 8/28,1'79

9/19,1'79

10/04,1'79

ll/15,1'79
l2/l2/i9
12/21/79

1/03/80
l/28/80

3/20/80

4/18/80

4/2S/8U

4/30/80
S/OS/80

S/16/80
6/16/80
7/02/89 

## i/Oi/80
7/18/80
7/21/80

7/22/80 State Implementation Plans/Revi Md Schedules H!!I..,Y.ins for**s~** 

### t:.in; Reas.:nably tlvailable Contr::>l 'I'echnolc;y**Regul~tion ~r**  

### Stationary Sources 1 

## of VOC


### SIP: General Prenhle**~r** 

### Prc::posed**~lernali<.ing** 

### on**~~oval** 

### of Plan Revisions for Nonattainment**Areas-Suppl~nt** 

### SJrmary of State Izt,plenent.ation Plan vtJC 

### Regulations Cl.arificadon for Final SIP Actions on 

### Asphalt Regulations \tJC 

### Test Methods 

### of 

### Prec:edures Exemptions for Degreasers
\OC**·~.;ulat.ions** 

### Issues \OC**~lations** 

### Issues State and Regional Agencies Continue to 

### Make Sericus Errors in Calculatin; E:quivalenee· with 

### t.he RACI'**~CC'Vn!ndations** 

### for SUrface Coat.ing 44 FR 50371

Pol;lase/ Calca;:'li
Rhoaes

Rhoads


### Helms



### New 

### f\Jgit.ive Hydrocarbons Dnissions Fac:tc1rs for Rhoads Petrolel.ll'l Refineries ard Petrod'lertlical Plants 

### A;:lplic:ability of VU: 

### E)ftissiorv; G.Jide1ines•: General Motors**Cor~=Qration,** 

### N:::lnh 

### Tarrytc:JWn AsSO"\bly Plant Giacc:one

CaTiplianc:e rchedules for tOol 

### Solvent Ted'1nolc;y Rhoaes Pro;raJtS of the Graphic Art.s 

### C1C Cate;or:r•
Letter to 

### N.Y. tl€C, 

### Phatl"'\aceutical CI'Ci


### Procedure to 

### CalOJlate [Qui valency with 

### t:.he C'I'G Rhoads 

### Recommendations for Surface Costing
Solvent Reactivities
Gas::»line Tank 

### Truck**~ations** 

### Exenption for Cold Cleaner Dagreasers**Oete~ination** 

### of 

### Capture Efficiency
Letter to 

### Texas Oil Mari<.C!ter-5 Associati01,
calOJlation r:% 

### Evaporation Loss 

### frO'\ E:xtt!rnal Floating ft:)of Tanks : Solvent Reac:tivi ties List Additions Rhoads 

### PlilliS'$

45 FR 48941**~~I**


### 95. :/23/80**Le~~er ~o** **N~** 

### on 'I'ark Truc:ks**Ba~::-**


### !E. 

### '7/30/60**Leal<.~** 

### frO" Cas:)line 'l'ark 

### Trucks**He~ s~.**  

### 7/31/60 At:r'licabili ty 

### of 

## vue Control 'I'od'lnique**GJic~e-** 

### R!·'loaes 

### lines (C'I'Gs) 

### to the AutCJI"'bile**Marufactl.l:'iJ"~g** 

### Industry



# ss. 6/04/60 .Applic:abiliey of Paper Coatin;, Fabric**eoa~~:.in;,** 

### an:!**~aphic** 

### Arts 

### C'I'G Hel."'nS



## 89. 8/08/80 Re<;l.l!st for Confi:mation of the 

### Ol!finitic:n of HP.lr.s


### a 100 'Ibn Source 

### as Applie:S to Q:)ntrols in the Gascline Stora;e and 

### Marketin; Olain
90. 

### 8/22/80 'Ihe Use of 

### Pe:mi t Condition!' to 

### Cafine P:ltten- Rhoac!s tial to**~t** 

### 9!. 

### 8/25/80 Fabric Printing Definition 

### Be::::y

Q":' 

### 8/28/80 Issl.l!s Concernir; vt:C 

### RACI' II Pe-;ula tions Helrs 

# --· DevelOi)f'ent
93. 9/03/80 MiscellaneOJs Metal Part!' and Products 

### en; Entission Limits for Cofttin; of Shippin; Pails Helms


### and Drums 

## H. lO!l7/SO E'.Quivalenc:y Calculations with the 

### en; 

## Reo::rr- Rhoads Pendations for Surface Coating


### 95. l0/24/80 Set II**~** 

### Regulation ,lpprcwal Hawkins

96. 10/28/80 Standards of PerfotTnance for ......., Stationary 45 FR 71537
sources:**~aphic** 

### Arts Inc:klstry: Publication Roto;ravure Printin;: Prc:posed**~le** 

### and Nr:ttiee of POOlic Hearing
97. ll/20/80**~le** 

### of Irnprcwed Transfer E:f 

### ficienc:y in D!!m!On- 

### R."'loads**stratin~ ~j)liance**  

### with the C"''G 

### Fecarm!nc!ations for 9Jrf ace Coating
98. ll/20/80**~prc::priate** 

### Transfer Efficiencies for**Me~ll ~**  

### F\zrni ture and 

### large .tppliance Coatin;
99. ll/20/80 O:r'llpli ance with '.U: 

### ani ssion Limitations 1:or HMI!dns Can Coating Operations
100. 1.1/25/80 ApprC7olal am Pranu19!1tion 

### c1 ImplementatiC)n Plans: Revisa:1 taat11ine for S&JtrtU.ssicn of 

# va: .CS FR 78121
RACI' 

### Pegulations for Set II Cl"G


### 101. ll/28/80 Apprcpriate Transfer :Efficiencies for Metl!tl 

### Furniture and large Appliance c:oatin; Helms



# -**-~:..:,-** 

### 102. 12/0l/80**~vised** 

### Seasonal Aftert:llrner Policy Bar:er**6~!**


### lJ3. 1:V0:!.'80 Role C::**IJ9\~r~ed** 

### 'I'ransfer Efficiency in Hel.""S 

### Oe!Tcn.llltrati n; CO"r9lianc:e with 

### the C'l'G 

### Rec:o-**~tendations** 

### for Surface Coatin;
104. 12/02/80 Cr::st E:ffec:t.iveness fer RACI'

- Application to He!:ns leaks 

### fran PetroleiJ'I"' Refinery E'.qui.,.,.nt**l~S.** 

### 12/02/80 RACI' for Specialty Printin; Operations R."lor_,s


### 106. 12/03/80 Set 

### II \OC 

### Jegulations**ApprC~~ra1** 

### Rhoa:!s


### lOi. 12/03/80 Canpliance with 

### U.X:: !mission Limitations for Hawkins can Coating Operaticns
lOB. 12/24/80 RACI'/t.AER Dttetminations for Casket Coate:::s 

### Hew 109. 12/30/80 New**Nonattai~nt** 

### Designations Rhoads llO. 

### l/16/Bl Model Index for Ozone SIPs Cal:a;ni lll. 

### l/22/81 SIPs,**Appr~al** 

### of 

### 82 Ozone Plan for Exten:sion 46**F~** 

### il82 Areas Final Policy
112. 1/28/81 letter to**~oehler** 

### Concemin;**Coati~** 

### Specifications Barber

113. l/28/81 Federal Paint Specifications Vis-A-Vis**~#** 

### Rarl:ler 114. 2/03/81 

### Part D Conditional Apprc:wa1s

- PrioritiziJ"Q 

### Helms Conditions
115. 2/06/81 Stonr;e Tank Vap!)r Balance Requir..nts a1: Tyler Synthesized Fhar'l'\!ceutic:a1 Products M!lrufclc:t.\Jre Facilities 116. 3/13/81 Applicability of Fuel Storage**~ations** 

### to JP-4 

### Jet F\Jel 'Iuerk



## 117. 3/24/81 Test Meth::>ds for the 

### Set I ard Set II Cl'G 

### '!\Jerk Source Categories 

### llB. 4/03/81 Clarification af 

# vue ""Test Method·**~in~ments** 

### '!\Jerk 119. 4/06/81 \OC 

### Test Methods 

### or Procedures for Gro.Jp 

# J: and**~OJP** 

### II C'IG5 

### '!\Jerk

120. 4/17/81 In 

### tarnal Surf ace CoatiJ'Q &Jbble for 

### Rhode Island Willi al'l\.5 

### 121. 4/23/81 Criteria for**~ewin;** 

### State VUC !Uhhle 

### '1\Jert Regulations 122. 4/24/81 Letter to 

### Mass;crt on· Jet Fuel 

## Burr



# - +:<.. 

### 123. 4/29/Bl NSPS,**Petroleutt~** 

### Liquid Stora;e**~ssel5** 

### - 46 FR 23984 Equivalency Deterndnation

## i:CI



# , 

# ... 4/30/31 Status of 1982 O:one SIP Iata 

### Base Rhoads



# _



# ..... ' Tyler**!~5.** 

### S/06/81 Cost E::f 

### fe c:t 

### i ve ness ef 

### Gasoline Tank 

### 'l'r\Jck**Ce~ification** 

### PrCQram
126. 7/2l/Bl State cf**Mic.~i;an** 

### Stage I Setvi 

### ce Station 5\ Hel..""S 

### Detet'TIIination
l2i. 

### 7/24/81 Tank 

### 'l'r\Jck**Ce~ification** 

### toclitshcp FollOo>"'U p Nid'lolson


## 129. 7/24/81 Results of 

### the**~ional** 

### 9Jrvey 

### of**St~ies** 

### Related to RAC' Beyond the 

# va: C'l'Gs 

### Hel:ts


### 129. 8/07/81 \oerkin; Gra.:p Meetin;

- Review of lll(d) Cuide- Goc:::ldwi 

### n lines to Control lrichloroethylene,**Perchloroet~-** 

### lene, lll Trichlorc:at.hane Methyl Olloride and 

### Trichlorotri-flouroethane from Existing**~ganic** 

### Solvent Cleaners
130. 8/ll/81 Aerosol can Mcuntin; OJp Sealant CO'n;:ounds 

## Hel-ns
131. 

### 8/14/81 A.?plicabili ty 

### of the 

### f'4iscellaneOJs Metal**P"~s** He 

### .!.:Its C'l'G 

### to 

### the Coating of Electrarctive Parts
132. 9/ll/81 Review of PA CrOJp II**~C ~ations** **Pol;lase~•i~li~s** 

### 133. 9/22/Sl SUrtmaey 

### of Gra.:p I and II \U: RACI' 

### Regulations Nicholson
134. 9/22/81 Review of Final Gra.:p II \OC**~lations** 

### for**Pol;lase/Willi~s** 

### Massachusetts
135. 9/24/81**~ry** 

### af 

### Gra.:p I \t.JC 

### Rl!gulatiors**~** 

### lli lJI"\5 

### 136. 10/20/81 Catlpliance Schedules for Auto 

### As58"1\bly 46 FR 51366 

### Paint Shc:ps
137. 10/26/81 \U:**~;uh** 

### tions for the 

### 19 82 SIP Helr.s


### 138. ll/04/81 Status of State Action on Gl:a.:p III and Po1c;lase**Be~nd** 

### Source Categories
139. ll/06/81 Policy on the 

### Use of 

### c:.ondi tional**Ap~CMlls** 

### Pennett ( traft)
140. ll/09/81, New 

### Prccedures for Review of State Implement-a- Bennett tion Plans
l4l. 

### ll/30/81 Review of Plan**~visions** 

### by the 

### Office of 

### Bennett Managel"ent and !U:!get
142. 12/ll/81 Policy on the Use of**~Conditional Ap~ovals;**  

### Bennett



# - 

# - 143. 12/14/81**~ry** 

### of TaM 'l'r\Jek Certification Tests Polglase**-~-** 

## 144. 12/14/81 Letter to 

### George Payne on Can**Manufaeturir~** 

### P.ar!::er**S...~I** 

### HS. 

### 2/09/82**Acc~~ility** 

### of**~.la~'s ~ns~ration**  

### Con- rel:ns 

### cernin; the Surface Coatin; of Miscellaneous Mt!tal Part.S 

### and Products 

# ' 2/12/82**Ac~t.abili** 

### t.y 

### of Otlahatla 's J:li!M:)nstration Con- Hel."TTS 

### 146. cernirr; t.he Surface Q:)atin; of 

### Miscellan•eous Metal Pans 

### and Products
147. 3/19/82**-'Ptr~al** 

### and PrOIIUlgation of 

### Implementation Plans: San Francisco Ray 

### Area Air Basin ten

### 47 F'R 11866
att.air"rnent Area Plan (Boiler-Plate for 

### •,;cod cause•)
148. 3/19/82 San Francisco Nonattail"'""!nt Plan 47 FR ll866
149. 3/25/82 Clean Air Act 

### Jtestric:tion Applyin; to 

### SIP PI! 

### r:y-rx::a:::**~isions** 

### D.Je 

### 7/l/82
150. 4/08/82 EPA !ttissia'\5 

### Tra:UI"k:; Policy Spirlk


### 151. 4/19/82**~** 

### from Rakeries Car!:l
152. 6/18/82 Prime Coatin; at Chrysler Assa"\t)ly Plant "''tler
153. 

## B1211a2**~uivalency** 

### wi 

### t.h the Perdlloroethylene Ocy 

# Hew Cleaning 

## CTG·RAcr Recommendations 15.;. 9/07/82 Clarificatic::n of Me!1IO 

### tated May 

### 6, 1981 'l'ruck Helms 

### Certification Program
155. 9/28/82**~1ic:y** 

### on Excess &rdssions Illrin; Start"'l.a·J•, Bennett R'lutdown,**Maintenal'\c~,** 

### and**Malf~ct.ions** 

### 156. ll/Ol/82 Errata Sheet for**Petroleurt~** 

### Dry 

### Cleaners Fa:::ner 157. l/17/83 Alloeb1e 'l'ank 

### l'ruc:k teminal Emission Lind 

### ts 

### Pol; lase 158. 3/04/83 Review of Illinois Grcup II**~** 

### Rules**\4lli~/?ol;lase** 

### 159. 4/04/83 Draft RACI' 

### t:eterminations Wil1iC!I'ftS 160. 4/lS/83 Reynolds "'etals

- vtX: 

### 9Jbhle with Lon;-'Ile:cn 

### HelMs**Errtis~ions** 

### Averaging 161. 4/21/83 Avengin:J 'l'ilne

-**~** 

### El::;uivalence Ccmpliance Calculations Pol;lase

162. 5/10/83 Q:-aphic Arts

- 100 'l'PY ibtentia1**!:)(et'lpti~:)n** 

### Pol;lase 163. 

### S/17/83 QJidance fer Non-C:'I'G RACr 

### t:eteJ:minations Hel:ns 

### 164. 6/03/83 Boc:K 

### Cover Coating Pol; lase 165. 6/06/83 'l'ank 

### Truck Ka 

### tch 

### Covers Calcagni



# - ·f<.-...:. 

# - 166 6/28/83 Letter to tbw 

### Olt!r.\ical on !:)(empt Sol-uentls Helms

### 158.
169. liO. 6.'29/83

7/05/83
9/14/83 9/19/83
li1. 10/12/83
li2. 

### 10/20/83
173. 10/24/83
174. 

### 10/31/83

l 75. 

### 12/05/83

! 

### i6.



### li7.

178.



### 179.

180.
181.

182.


### 183.**18~.**


### leS.



### l86.

187. 

### 1/20/84

l/27/84

2/29/84

3/06/84

3/08/84
3/15/84

4/16/84
517/84

5/7/S4

5/21/84



### 6/19/84



### 6/25/84 Exclusion o!**Ex~pt.** 

### 5ol "Uent.s f:-C" 

## v..:t::. Calc::..-**l~t.ions** 

### Reynold!; Met.al B.Jhble Helms


### AllCJool'able 'I'ank 

### Truck 'Terminal Endssion IJ.J,,i tlt"'- 

### P.:>lc;lase**~ate** 

### of 

### l/17/83 MemO 

### lest Met.h::lds for**Ga~line** 

### Bulk 'I'e%:1'1\inals Mcl.au:;hj.:in Averagin; 'I'imes for Canpliance 'IYler
Addition of 

### Dilution Solvents to 

### Printin;; Inks P.:>lc;lase
Solvent**~a~ivities** 

### Federal**~;is:e:** 

### Avera;in; 'I'iJnes for Canpliance with \tlC 

### 'IYler emission Lw ts Meetin;**~;:crt** 

### on 

### torrr'I'e=n Averain; for ,.U: Fblc;;lase Sources Avera;il"\1 'I'i.rtes for**~liance** 

### with \tJC 

### E)o,ission O'Connc:**Li~its--SIP** 

### Revision Policy
Violations of 

### Record Ker,:lin; Pra..oisions**il~ ~~oved**  

### SIPs Draft F-tx:o Re;:crt 

### for 9Jrface Coating Calculations


# vue EQuivalency Calculations

- Clarification of Require-rents
Letter to 

### Lillquist on Flexible Packagin; Reynolds and \oestvaco Plant 

### Prc::posed**~e** 

### SIP Revisions
Letter on 

## vue ext end 

## c::cmpli ance dates 'Toj)c:oatinQ and Printy of 

### Urethane Fabric and Sheets
Exclusion of 

### Vinyl**Plasti~l** 

### frcm 

# va: canpliance Calculations
ConfitJnation that 

# vue Regulations are required for C1C III Re;ional survey
-**~** 

### EQuivalency Calculations
ConfiJ:Ntion of 

### tefinition of 

### 100 TPY !iource 

# sso

Fblc;lase

'JYler

Cannon
Hellns



### Rothblatt

Helms



### "IYler

Pole; lase**~::x:-;:;:**



### lSS. 

### 6/25/84**~~icahi1ity** 

### of CTG III 'lYle:-



## -- 189. 

### 7/30/84 Federally**El"\force~1e** 

### Fe:ni ts 

### Hel.-ns fa:' 

### 100 'I'?Y non CTG sout"CeS
190. 8/28/84 \lX: 

### data sheet for suppliers Emison 

### cf 

### paints and c::r:lilting&
191. 8/29/84 \0: 

### Poli**~snic** 

### (Frcm

# 19~ Issue

# ~solution Ptccess)
192. 9/ll/84 Meehods 

### to establish daily violations fran Ber::y 

### annual 'Ill 

### C u..;e 

### data


### 193. 9/14/84 \llC 

### test**~~~ethods** 

### or**~ocedures** 

### fer Gra1p**I~,** 

### 'IYler II, and III CTGs


### 194. ll/07/84 Connecticut \OC 

### issues "'-:rphy



### 195. 12/06/134 Comments on 

## vee clarification**~** 

### Ha;;

196. 

### 12/21/84 Connecticut \lUC 

### issues Helms



### 197. l/09/85 Clarification of C'Iti RJICr**~c::ararend.ation fc~r**  

### 'IY1er High-I»nsi ty**Pol~thylene,** 

### polyprcpylene, · and polystyrene
198. 

### 2/04/85 Stack height in facilities usin; air stripi)in; Cannon for groundwater cleaning
199. 

### 2/ll/85 Pes;::onse c:oncernin; 

# va: clarification 1'N!mC 

### 'I'jler
200. 4/02/85**~ission** 

### 1imi ts 

### for c::r:liltin; cf shippin; pails Hel.ns 

### and d runs 201. 4/23/85 Consic1eration cf 

### Organi!IIOls in \1tJC 

### Canplia.nce 8nison Calculations
202. 4/23/85 Printin; on UnsupJ;Ortec1 Vinyl Film Q:)ve 

### rec1**~ler** 

### hyC'l'G


### 203. S/20/85 Pesul t s cf May 3 \OC 

### Meetin; (tram 19 VC: 

### Issue Jesolution Process)
204. 7/22/85 ( Gr' 

### aphic Arts

- 

### ltd 

### d-On 

### Control 5ystans tal ton
205. 8/15/85 Fabric Coadng

- Dip and 

### Impregnator Coati.n; CNTpler
'206. 8/27/85 Classification of Benzene as a "WC 

### 'tYler
207. 8/29/85 Paper Coat in; RACl' 

## te tetll'\i nation .:bhnson



## , 208. 12/16/85 Baseline Ti.!'le 

### Period for \tJC 

### Transfer E:ff].cien- Hel:ns -""'=:..

--- - r::y 

### credits

## ___ ....:.



# ., 

# .... 1:/:1.'66**Ea~ly** 

### Compliance and**Stip~ated** 

### Penalties in ?.as:-:i c/.:..:

... s:-. :.:-: 

# ---· \ 

# vee Enforcement Cases



# .. ., 

# ..**·-~·** 

## 1/20/8'7 Deter.nination of Econanic Feasibility Hel.-rs



# ...... 

# . _



# ... 3:'16/Si November 

## 21 , 1966 '1encranc!.Jm Titled •tarly**Hi~~e C~liance**  

### and Stipulated Penalties in 

# vee Enforcement Cases•**~:s.** 

## 4/li/8'7 Definition of VOC Hel.-rs


## 226. 6/25/87 Emission**OoJt~f** 

### for Ccntrol Tec:hniaues qeli"!'S Guidelines

- Volatile Organic carpa.md Sa:'ces 

## 227. 7/21/87 Definition 

## of Volatile Organic Ccmpounds Hel.ms (VOC's)
2:::9. 

## 9/09/97 Alternative**C~liance** 

### for Graphic**~.s** 

### '!'.;le:- RAC"I' 

### 2:9. ·. 

## 11/04/87 Additional Information Concernin; E:missi1::>n Hel.-:s Cwt-of! - 3 lbs/hr, 

## 15 lt&/day



# -·

# --co**Upca':.e~** 

# - 1/:J;s: 

# lo...,. C:-oss Reference Index bv Source Cate·corv

Date of

'1. 

## Cateoorv Memo Ctrioinator
1)**s~:-f** 

## ace Coating of Cans ll/21/78 Rhoads 12/20/78 Helms ll/20/80 Hawkins 12/03/80 Hawkins

8/11/81 Helms 12/14/81 Barber

5/16/86 Emison ( 19 

## vo::: :ss..;e: 2)**S~J:-face** 

## Coating of Metal Coils 3) SOJrface Coating of Fabrics 4/13/79 Helms 8/04/80 Helms 8/25/80 Berry 12/02/80 R.'"loads

8/05/85 Cr:Jmple:- 4)·surface Coating of Paper 11/09/78 Rhoads P:-ocucts 5/13/79 Helms 8/04/80 Helms 8/29/85 Johnson
5) 

## Su:-face Coating of Auto- 10/06/78 Rhoads mobiles ll/16/78 Barber 5/24/79 Rhoads 4/18/80 Giaccone 7/18/80 Giaccone 7/31/80 Rhoads 10/20/81 46 FR 51386

6/18/82 Tyler 6) 5.::-face Coating of Metal ll/20/80 Rhoads**F~.:rni** 

## ture ll/28/80 Helms 7)**S~Jrface** 

## Coating of Magnet Wire
8)**S~J:-face** 

## Coating of Large 11/20/80 Rhoads Ap;:>liances ll/28/80 Helms 9 ) 

## Gasoline 'I'ermi nals 8/08/80 Helms ' 

## 8/22/80 Rhoads 9/14/83 Polglase 10) Gasoline Bulk Plants 9/14/83 Polglase 11) Stage I Vapor Recovery 7/21/81 Helms Roof 'I'anks



# -**-~..:.**

### c~oss**~e!erence** 

## Index bv**So~rce** 

## Cateoorv (co. 2)

Catec:c:-v 

# ::> Gasoline Storage in Fixed Roof Tanks 13) 

## Petroleum Refinery Process 14)**C~tback** 

## Asphalt

15) Solvent Metal Degreasing

l6)**s~r:ace** 

## Coating of Hiscel-**laneo~s** 

## Metal Parts and Products

l7) Flatwood Paneling 18) Pharmaceutical

l9) Pneumatic**R~bber** 

## Tire 20)**Vegeta~le** 

## Oil 21) Graphic Arts

22) Dr"J Cleaning

23) Leaks at Petroleum Refineries Date of Memo 8/08/80

3/20/80 12/19/78

3/06/79 10/04/79

9/07/78 12/12/79

7/02/80 8/04/80 9/03/80 l/28/81 8/14/81 2/09/82 2/12/82 4/02/85

4/30/80 8/04/80 2/06/81 3/13/81

4/25/80 8/04/80 10/28/80

5/10/83 7/22/85 9/09/87 8/04/80 8/07/81 8/27/82 ll/01/82 10/24/83 12/02/80 Oric:inato:- Helms

Rhoads Rhoads Rhoads Rhoads Rhoads Rhoads Rhoads Rel:ns Helms**Bar~er** 

## Helms Helms Helms Helms

Giaccone Helms Tyler Tuerk

Rhoads rtelms Federal Registe:- Polglase Dalton Tyler Helms Helms Helms Farmer Federal Register Helms

## CGF**C~oss Refe~ence**  

### Index bv**So~rce** 

### Catecorv**(oc~**



### Cat.eco:v**~4)** 

### Ext-ernal Floating Roof ':'a 

### nits

25) Gasoline Tank Trucks

:!6)**Bw~!:lling**



### 27) Solids Applied/Transfer Efficiency Date of Memo
8/08/80 3/13/61 4/29/81
6/16/80 7/18/80 7/21/80 7/30/80 5/06/81 7/24/81 12/14/81

9/07/82 6/06/83 9/19/83 5/01/79 7/15/79 4/17/81 4/29/81 4/08/82 4/15/83 7/05/83 10/12/83 10/31/83 12/05/83

1/20/84 3/09/84 1/22/86 2/28/86
6/15/79 7/03/79 1/28/80 5/05/80 8/04/80 10/17/80 ll/20/80 12/02/80

2/26/81 3/04/83 6/29/83 2/29/84 3/06/84 12/16/85

4/ll/86 C 1 

### rici**nato~** 

### Helms '!'ue rk Federal**Re;:s~e~** 

### Rhoads Rhoads Williams Hel:ns Tyler Nicholson Polglase Helms r:alcagni**McLa~ghlin** 

### Rhoads Walsh Williams 'I'i.2erk Spink. Helms Helms Tyler Tyler Polglase O'Connor Tyler Price (19 VOC !sswesl Emison (19 VOC :ss
... es Walsh Rhoads Salman Rhoads Relms Rhoads Rhoads Re1ms Salman Wi1liams/Polglase Helms Polglase Tyler Helms Emison (19 VOC**:ss~es·**

# ' --:-**-~.**



## :::-css Re!e:-e!"'ce !r.dex bv**Sc~,;:-ce** 

## Catecorv (pc. 4)

::a:eoorv 

# :s> Exempt Solvents

29) 

## Capture Efficiency 30) 

## '!'est Methods

31) 

## Beyond Set I and II 

## CTG

32) 

## lll(d) 33) 

## Definition of VOC

34) RFP 35) 

## 5\**R~,;le** 

## 36) 

## Long**T~rm** 

## Averaging

37) 

## Jet Fuel

3e)**nil~tion** 

## Solvents Date of Memo 7/08/77 8/24/78 3/06/79 6/04/79 7/22/80 2/26/81 6/28/83 6/29/83 l0/24/83

5/01/86 5/22/86 9/22/86 7/07/83 11/15/79

3/24/81 4/03/81 4/06/81

## ~/11/86 1/11/t¥ 7/24/81 11/04/81 12/30/81**8/2~/84**



## l/31/86 6/25/87 ll/4/87 8/07/81 10/26/78

8/27/85 4/17/87 7/21/87 12/21/78

8/17/79 10/31/83 12/05/83 l/20/84 3/06/84 3/13/81 4/21/81 :4/24/81 10/20/83 10/30/86 

## Oricinator Federal**Re~is:e:­** 

## Barber**Bar~er** 

## Federal ?.e;iste:- Federa1**Re~iste:­** 

## Salman Helms Helms Federal Re;iste:- Tyler Tyler Hathaway Berry Rhoads T1.1er1< Tuerk T1.1erk Emison (19 

## VOC**:ss~es** 

### Tyle.r 

## Helms Polglase Helms Rasnic (19 VOC**Iss~es**



## . SSCD (19 

## VOC Isswes)

Helms Helms Goodwin Helms Tyler Helms Helms James Rhoads Tyler Polglase O'Connor Tyler Tuerk Polglase Burr Berry Helms

### c::;F



## Cress Re!erence Index bv**~ource** 

## Cateoorv**C~o~**


## Ca:eco:-v 39) De!inition of 100**'!on-Per-~ear**



## 40) Cl'G III Date of Me"'o 9/07/79 8/08/80 8/22/80 S/10/83 6/2 5/84 2/28/86 4/11/86 S/21/84 41) Afterburners 12/01/80 2/28/86 42) Non-C!G Bakeries
431 

## Hi;h**~n~ity** 

## Polyethylene,

.. Polypro;>ylene, and Polystyrene 44) Surface Coat in; of Vinylcoaterl**Fa~ric** 

## or Vinyl Sheets 45) Criteria for Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas 46) Low Solvent Technology

47) Com;>liance Date Extension 48) General 

# vue Issues 49)**Recordkee~inc;/** 

## Re&:lOrtinc; 50) Class Al, A2, and. B 

# vue sources Sl) Baselin• Year for VOC Percent**-E~ission** 

## Reductions as per State SIP Regulations 4/19/82 l/09/8 6

4/23/8 6

S/19/78

8/07/86 ll/21/86

3/16/87 8/07/86 S/20/85 l/17/86 4/11/8 6 1/31/86

2/28/86 10ri c ina tor Rhoads Helms Rhoads Pol; lase Helms Emison Cl9 VOC**!ss~es:** 

## Emison (19 

## vue**:ss~es:.** 

## 'Tyler Barber Emison ( 19 VOC :ss",;es)

1 

## Carb Tyler

Crumpler

43 FR 21673

Potter Rasnic/Alushin Hitte Potter SSCD (19 VOC Issues) Price (lY 

## voc Issues) Emison (19 VOC**!ssues~** 

## SSCO (19 VOC Issues)

Emison (19 VOC !SS',;esl1-


### ,



# -- \- 

## !

- C -1:' 

# "'·
Cross Reference Index 

# ov Source Cateoory 

## Coo. 6)

52)**~y?e** 

### of**C~pliance** 

### Monitor- 4/ll/86 in;**~•hen** 

### Incineration Is Used S?oradically 53) Cost Effectiveness of 8/04/86 controlling VOC's 54) Clean up Solvents 10/30/86 Emison (19 

## voc**iss~esl**



## Berey

Helms

### ATTACHMENT 6**SL~IES** 

### OF CONTROL TECHNIQUES GUIDELINES (CTG'S)

# I SIJI't"ART OF C'TG OOC:JMEN':' FOR TAme TRUCX GASOL.I NE L.OAO I HG

**:!~~M** I NI.LS

AFC'tC":"tD

**F.OC!t.!~:ES** 

### NUI'!SER OF

**AFrtc~tO** F'AC:t.!'T1ES Ally t1n1r. truck lo.a1n9 ooerat 1ons It the pr1111ry

**w1~o** i eu I e out; et for

**~sohne** wfl;cn del;vers It letst 76.000 littr/dly f:ZO.OOO

**;•It=•~** · A fiC111ty wfllCII 0tl1VII"S under 20,000 91l/01y H

**~~~ve~e=** Oy :l"'t CTG for bulk 1111nts. AccOI"dlftCJ to tilt lul"tlu of Census. tl'ltl"! ,...,., 1,92'5 tt-1na;$ '" 1972.

**C~o~rl"ent** tstllllf.tS 11"1 IOOUt 1,600 f.lr"'lllfti)S ftlf.lii)IIWid!.

lhtl'lour. viOO" l"tCOvtry systtfiiS, YOC 1!1111UlonS can range fi"''ll' :.: :: 1.4 g/1,000 llttrs of ti'II"Ougnout (5 to 12 1b/1,000 g1ll.

**~o,.** a

**:y:~:!·** s1ze f1c1l1ty l'ltv1n9 1 tl'lrougnout of 950,00: 11ttl"/d1Y (25o,::o 

### ;•:;:ay VOC IM1SS1011S 11"1 tStlmtttd to bt 200

**~/yr** (220 tOn/yl"),
Fo,. 111 uncont!"Ollea flclllty wltl'l fi•ed f'OOf ttnks, 1

**133.~00 :,~e~**  /d1y

**(35,00~** gll/dly) 1111nt would I"ISult ;n VOC .-;sslon of 10:

**:~"'!"·** Fo,- 1n unconti"Olled ftc111ty wltl'l floeting roof ttnks, 1 454,00C

**11te~/** dly (120,000.911/dly) fecility would re$Wlt tn 

### YOC emissions of 100 f.OII/yr.
Tilt recon.nded tiiUSion lt•it ts 80 111J/11ter

**(O.~i7** 1b/1,000 911 l of ,asoline 1oldecS. Tins h•tt ts basH on

**su~~~~ergeo** fill ana v1oo,. recovery/conti"Ol systeft!S. No leaks tn tilt vaoor collec:tion system during ooer1t1on ts 1

**requi~t.**

A 1111111111111 conti"Ol of 87 oercent ts uoecttd for tr•e lotdlng facil tty.

BASIS: 250,000 911/day f1e1l ;ty witll ac:we veoot• control

**syst~s.**

**~o;** ttl cost: Annu• 1 ; ztd cost : Cost etfecttveness:



### 1 

## suo.ooo - $195,000 

## s zo.ooo - s 30,000 S1ZO • $180 11er ton 

### vee

# I I I I 

### : ; I 

# I ' I 

## I SU"MARY 

# or

**~G** DOCUMENT

**~OR** 

### BULK GASOLINE

**PLAN~:** 

# i

. A wnoleule guol1ne dat,.1Dut1on fac:n 1ty wn1er.

**,~s** • !Ill& llftutr·

**AF~E:~tO** 

# I 011ly tnrougnout of 76,000

**lite~s** (20,000 gel) of gasol1ne.

**FAC:~lTl£S** Facil1t1tS WII1Cft

**Gtlivt~ OYI~**  20,000 gal/day

**I~ C:Ovt~~**  **~nOtP** ·. tnt

**~~ fo~**  ttP'IIItnals. Potentially

**sevt~e** ec:onolntc

**,a~osrnc** 'l'

.. y :e lencounUP"ed Dy bulk Dlants """Cft dtl1vtP' less tft.ln 4,000 galt:ay. 

### NIJI'IIIEI: OF 

# I

**Tllt~e** .. ,.. 

### ZJ,l67 buill: olants in 1972

**ac:co~•S,no** to tM

**AFt:':~ED 8u~e1u**  of Census.

**Cu~,..nt** tst1•tts a" aoout 1l! ,OCC tlu I k

**FACI~!TitS** gasoline olants ftlt1onw•ae. 

## vo: ,. Est,

.. teo annual em1ssions .,., 150,000 M;/Y"

**116~.~CC ~=~ty~.** 

**EP'ISSI~S** [1(, 15) wft1C:II r'eDP'fStnt atxlut 0.6

**llt~ent** of tSt'lllllteo VCC

**~-.o~;~,** tm1SS10nS ftlt1011WI0t. YOC 

## I A facH1ty wHII tllf'H Storage tankS wouiG IUIVf VOC ttrtSS1011S

**£~:SSIOt\** aooro111111t1ng 4.4 tg/Oay (20 1b/day) olus a 

## "1"9t' of O.Z :c

**~-::** ;/

**u~.~:** I , 000 11 ttP"S tll,.ouqnout ( 2. 0 to 25. 0 1 b/1 , 000 gal)

. Fo,. a :yc ·:a: PER size fac:11ity 11av1119 1 tllrouqnout of 18,900 liter·toay (S,COO ;al; FACli.ITY day) IYtr'lgt VOC tm1SS1011S are tSt1Nted tO De l!i l'lq/yP' (17 tOIIIf";. 100 TOr./YR 

# I

SOURCE None.

SIZE EI!1SS 10n 1 i•1ts recon.ntSetS in teNS of

**eouietN~~t** soectfic:at1on CTG altt"'lt1ves: E"lSSION 1.

**Su0..~9td** ftll of outgoing tank tructs.

LIMIT 2. Altt"'lttve 1 • vaoor balance for incolring tl'lnSfeP'. l. A1te"'at1ve 

### Z •

**vaoo~** balance for outgoing tl'lftSftl".


## voc Em1ssion ••ouc:;ons 

# I Totll Pllnt 

# I 

# ,, TransftM

**•t!ru~ION** A1te"'ative 1 

# I Z2 IJtr'Ciftt 

# I Z7

**oe~ent** ll[ll ' Al tl"'ltht Z 5'

**oe~ent** 

# " Ot!r'CI"t ' II'AC::.!TY 

### I A 1 te"'at1ve l 77

**~:»e~cent** 92

**oe~ce"~** i 

### BASIS: 4,000 ;alttSay tii1'0UgftDut US1ft9

**SU~"9fC** fill antS COSTS vaoo,. Dalance for bOtft inconin9 ano out901ng

**tl'ansfe~s:.** C.oita1 cost: S,,000 • S10,000 Annu•l izetS cost: 

## s 100- 

## s 1,200 Cc H effect1veness: S9 • S90 Cit" ton VOC



### 2 : '

I I I
: I I i

'

'**AFFEC~ED F'AC:L:~tES**  

### !4CDSr.· vf**AI='FtC~!O F'AC:L.I~lt:S**  

## voc**~!SSIO~S** 

### IU.':'lONiil:lE



## voc EMISSIOrl RAr•Gt PER



### FACILITY
100 TOM/YR

SOURCi



### SIZE
CTii 

### EMISSION

LIMIT

YOC**REDUC~ION** PER 

### FACILITY

COSTS• 

## •**SU~RT** 

### OF DOCUMENT FOR GASOLINE SERVIC[ STATIONS •**S~AG~**



### Transfer of guohne frQII 

### oeli•ery tl"\\cU to sei"V1Ct st1t1on storac;e unu. No 

### uet110tions 

# we"' IIOtad in tile •eesign Critt'''• for S:age : Yaoor Control Systems.•
Estillllted to De 

### 180,000

... 

## un guoline sei"V1ce sut1ons nationwtoe. The"' 1"' 2CO,OOO otfter gesoltne 01Soens1ng outle!s. For transfer of guohne to sti"VtCe sution storege unu, 'IOC (14 •c• 

### lfii1SStons estillllted to De 

### COO,OOO**~/yr** 

### (CCO,OOC :on/yrl ' .•• wntcn reoresents eoout 1.5 percent of esti

.. tad VOC em1SS1ons Mt10nwtOe. Wttftout •1oor eontrols, YOC emtssions are**estlm~ted** 

### to De 

### l.C lr.g/1,000 hta" (11.5 lb/1,000 911l of tllrougnout. For •**t~ical** 

### f1cility n1Y1n9 1 

### thraugnout of 151,000 11tertmo (CO,OOC g1l/mo1 

## vc: tm1SS1ons would De 2.5**~/yr** 

### (2.8 ton/yr) for Stlge I. 

### For 1ft 

### UftCOntrollld fac111ty, • 2,800.000 liter/me (750,000 g1l/-a) tnrougftaut results '" YOC .-iss1ons of 100 ton/yr.**v~~** 

### fe• ser•ict Stlt1ons will n1Y1 tft1s s1ze througftout. The eft1SS1ons 1ncluae Datft St191 

### I lnd Stage 

### 11 losses. E•iss10fl H•its**~nclld** 

### 1n ttPWS 

### of**~u1o-ent** 

### setecificlttons. , lleca-.noed cantrols are suC.Wf'9ed ffll Of 

### storege tants, ••oor tw1l1nce ·**Detwet~** 

### tl"\\ct 1nd tani., and 1 lelk '"'" tPVCk encl uoor transfer system

.. Stlqe r 

### control can Peduce 

### transfer losses by 95• 

### Dtrctnt and total fact11ty losses by 

### SO percent.

BASIS: Aoo11cat1on of sua.erged ffll 1nd YIOOr balance !o • Sti"ViCe SUtiOn w1th til"" 

### tlni.S. C.oital cost: 

## saoo Annul 11zed cost: Cost effecti'ftness: (S200l ( (S110) "'" ton 

### VOC lJ]

3**.\F~c:c;Eo**

**F.l.C::.:~IES**

NUI'!I!EII OF 

## .\F='::c;::o

.

. **~:.c:urtts**

I 

# I I YOC

E"!SStOHS NAT:OM;;:::lE

YOC
""'SSION 

# - ..

RANG£

P£11 

### FACILITY

I 

### 100 TON/TR 

## i ! ' SuURC£ 

### SIZE 

### c;G

**E!'!l~S:ON**

**LII'Il~**



# voc REOUt;ION

**'~il**

**j:'AC:L~TY**

COS!S• 

### SUMMARY OF CTG DOCUf.,ENT FOR PEiROL::UM 

## LIQUID STORAGE IN FIXED-ROOF TANKS

FiaeCI•I'OOf stOr"191t tiiiiiS 111¥1119 • C:IOIC1t}' 9"1ttr'

**~:1\tn** 1 

### so ,000 1, te

.. S '£:;. ::: 911 Or' 950 bDl) IIIII St0r"111g

**Olttr"Oie~** 11Qy1CIS wftiCft

**~IVIt** I :rue

**VIOC~ :~!S!~~**  9r'etter t!Wn 10.5 kP1 ( l.S OS\1). Fhed•f'OOf tan liS wftiC,,

**~ve** CIOIC

**~.** !S i

**!~** l

**~- ~**  • 1,600,000 liter'S (420,000 gal Or" 10,000 DDl) wseo to

**stor~** orcowc:ee

**:r~ae** 

### :·• tr.: c:onoens1tt Or"IOr" to le1se c:wstody transfer" '" eaemot.

Est1

.. ttd tnnutl

**e~~~issions** '" 560,000 l'rg/yr" (616,0CIO ton/yr) wnter

**"'!:·"!~!·:** 100wt 

### %.1 oerctnt of the tStl

.. ted 

### YOC eDISSions ftltionwtdt. EmtsStons :• ;:;: •·:· fued-rcof UnitS.,.. 4.7 t1111es that ff'CIII uut'inc; flott1r1g I"''of unr.s, •::.,:
.. ;·

**:-~** tot1l c:aotclty of

**fi•eo~oof** tanll storaqe is less. (1 4 

## 1
YOC

**e~~~ission** ranges for gasoline Or" crude oil

**store~tt USUI!I,"~**  5 t: 2': :.·"- oveM Otr' yw1r 1nd I true viOOr' O"U"" of 1J.8 

### to 69 lth (2.0 t: 1C :IS11 •. 

## s z

**e~** 

## s • I 1 1 

# I M t d t 

### w m CiOICity (gil) 

## •zo 1 

## toJ 2.J I 

### 10° 6.3 , 1 

### c= 01111ef1S lOftS

d'i

... I llt. (ft) 

# sa 1 

### 3D 100 I 

### 10 1 

### so J: 

## •e YOC £•1SS10ns ..

G.saline (!'11)/yr") 12

- 113 

### 52

- 535 123

- 1 .J! J

**(ton/yr~** 

### 13 • 125 57

- 590 135



### - 1,190 Crude Oil (Mg/yr 

### 7 • 65 

### 28 • 311 68

- 796 (t11n/yr) 

### 8 • 72 30 • 3'0 75

- 

### 875

**V1r"i1DI~** Cleotnding on
.. ny o.r ...

**te~** tncl11dtnq tht tyoe and

**v1oo~ ~ressure** 

**t~e** oet!"''le11m ltqyiCI storwd, SCfteGIII t Of Unll f;J 11 ft9 IIICI tii'Dty1 ng, InC!

**:~e** geogreon1c locat1on of ttnk. AS SIIOIIft IIIOYe I •eli.,_

**Sil~t** tlntl "'"tUlly

**uc:e~** 100 ton/yr tiii1SS\OftS of 

### YOC. **~~**

[1111 

### ss 10n 1i111i ts "'a..noed 1n tef'IIIS of eouio•nt

**Slle~i** fic:At1 ens: :

**n~ :a~~!:·:~**  of inttr"ntl f1ott1ng I"''OfS or llter"ntt1•e eawtvtlent

**c:an1~rol.** Types 

### of

**&i:e~a:~•t**

**~=nti"'** 1s a" not soeci fitd tn tht 

### CTG cSOC\IIIItftt.



### YOC tiii1SSion

**...ou~t1on** of 

### go.

**oer~ent** can t1e acn1ev•td l:ly insulht;on ,'!' lfttel"ftll notting I"''OfS.

8AS:S: 55,000 I:IDl (2,310,000 gtl) 

### •cs111111 sue tank wttn

**g~sol1ne** 

### o
..

**:-~~e** 

### :··, w1th true .v•oor o"ssur"t r"anqe of lo& to 

### 69 tPa (% to 

### 10 ;)S11) 11111 5 

### :o

**:;.~rno•e** .. 

### s
oer JIWI". C.o,ul cast: Annutl1ZeCI cost: Cost effectiveness:

• (S•) in01C:Ites SIV1119S Sll.OOO 

### SC70.000l to 

### 2,100 (S12Jl • S7J oer ton YOC



### 4

### Tht lffected f1c11it1es lnd

**ooe~'ltlons** 

### 1re: a. Vacuum oroauc1n9 systems (VPS).

I 

# ,u·-···-· i ;Ac:

**7**



### ~ **~t.Js** I

., 

### •••'' 

### D. ••st

.. •ttr SeOII'ItOI'S (WS). c. Process un1t turnl,.ounas (PUT)

- 

### (i.e., snutdown.

**~'tOa,.** •• 

### insoectton, 1nd s;art uo of a process un1t).

1 

### VQC 

## ' EMtssro,.s 

## 1

**H&.~:on.::r** I



## voc E!I'!!SSIOt\

IA,_\a£



### PEil F'AClL:TY TN CTG 

### orov1aes no tltntlt1ons.

t 

### Est,.,ted 1nnu1l n1t1on.'lt eM1SS1ons

**f~** 

### v1cuur. oroauc,n;

**sr~:e~s**

**~VPS),** .. 

### st

.. Utr StOIP'itOP'S (1.:5), 

### 1n0 l:lroCIU unit tul'ftiP'OunCS

**(~·~-:** 

# 1.,.,

**7]0,00~** "qlyr 

### (80:,000



### ton/~1') **wn1c~** reo,.esent IDOUt 

### 2.7



### ~·:t"" **,~** 1 

### Ut1mlteo 

### VQC tr.1U10ftS ftlt10no;tQe. (14j 

# I The eSt1mattd 1veP'191 annuli 

### VOC



### ~1sstons fror.



### affe~~~~ **fac~l·:·es** tit 

### 1 oet,.oleum refinery,,., Z,SiO Mg (2,3!0 ton). Em1SS10n fac::,.s

**wse~** 

### lfOI' eSt1mit1ng uncontrolled, reactive 

### VQC em1SSiOnS ll'e: 

# I 1. 'IPS • 

### 1•5



### k9/l05m~ ( 50



### lb/10~ btll) ,..fine,.,. tnrou;nout. b. 

### WS • 570

**k9/10~m**



## 3 (%00

**lb/1~~** 

### bOll P"tfinery tnrougnout. c. 

### PUT· 860 k9/lO • (301 lb/Ta- bb1) ref1ne"Y tnrougnout. The following annuli refirte"Y tftr"'UCJI\Outs will 

### ,..suit in 100 tonty,.

1 

### 100 TON/YR uncontralled 

### vee .-tss1ons

**f~** 

### eacn affected facility tyoe: SOURCE 

### 6 , 6 l 

### SIZE a. VPS

- 

### 24.6 I 

### 105111'" (3.9 I 

### 106 btll). 

# I b. 

### W5 • 6.J I JQ 

### 6 

### mJ (1.0 I 

### 10 

### 6 1:101). c. PUT • 

### 4.2 1 

### 10 

### .J (0.67a 10 bbl). 

# _ _,;..._ 

# ______ _

**~G**

**E~'t~s:oN**

**LIMY~**



### voc

**RE:lUC~lON**

**cos~s· ~1ss1on**  

### lt•1ts

**rec~oea** 

### in

**te~** 

### of toulOmeftt soec1ficat1ons: 1. 

### VPS •

**inc;nera~ion** 

### of 

### VOC .-;ss;ons

**f~** 

### conoense,.s. 1:1. 

### WS • COvtP'inq StDIP'ItOf' fof'etllyS. 

### c. 

### PUT • ca.oust1on of VIOOP' .-nted

**f~** 

### vessels. lmolement1nq

**t~t rec~notd**  

### controls c1n ,..duct 

## voc
.. ,ss1ons

**~y:** 

### 1. VPS

- 

### 100 oercent. D. 

### WS • 95 l:lel'cent. 

### c. PUT • 98 

### oei"Cent. 

### 9AS!S; A 

### 15,900 m 

### 3 101y 

### (Z,SOO ool/dly)



### l'efint~y ws1n9



### :~e : "'COillnenoed control tou1oment.

**t~otUl** 

### cost Sl,OOO: 

### Annu1l1zed cost Sl,OOO: 

### Cost effectiveness S/ton

• ( $•) 

### 1n01CiteS SIVlngs



### 5 24 • 52 ( 95) • ( 89, (104) 

### (96) **~** Ot

..

**~** 

# . 

# .. '" 63 

### 98 (310) 

### Z5 

## ' 901 \ 

### u,. •

**~s**·f.C<...:.**AF'FtC~ED F:..::~Ints** **Nur·~or:o:** 

### or**AFr~:n:o n.c:L.:~IES**  

# voc Ei

4 ISSIONS**~:..:.** 7 

## :ca •• ::'


## !voc EMlSSIOt; 

### i llANCii: P£R 

# I FAC!L.ITY

100 TON/YR SOURCE SIZE 

### CTG D'l!SSION

L.lMlT

YOC 

### AEOUCTI:lN PER 

### FACILITY**ccs~s·** Sl.ttQRT Of' CTG OOCIJI'IENT FOR C'JTBACK ASPHAL**~** 

# I

. Ro•""''tY construct1on 1ne1 llllinttnence ooerat1ons

### ~o~s1ng**IS""•l~ 'it~ue~,e:~**  !•'tft oetf'O 

### eur. CI1St111etes.

Est,

.. tn eM-.. 1 •; 

### ss; ans '" 655 ,000 

### "'9/ yr ( 721J. 000 ton '1"' i

. 

### n, s P'tPP'tStnts IOOut Z.C Oef'Ctnt Of tSt1

.. ttd YOC t1111SS101tS net10""'101!.**:~::**

Est1111tt«< YOC tiii1SS10ftS fror.**cu~eck** upnelt**pro•~~o~c::1on** ere: 

### •· 0.078 kg/kg (ton/ton) ·of slow cure aspnalt. o. 

### O.Z09·kg/kg (ton/ton) of**~~tdtwm** cure uPnllt

.. C. 

### O.ZOC kg/kg (ton/ton) Of P'I01CI CUP't ISOIIIlt. 

# I NOt genef'llly eoolicaole to this souf'Ce category s1nee tne 

### me1n sources of •ns 1ons ,,.. tile P'OICI surlaees .,,,.. tile netnel t 'Is IDP li eel. 

# I SY0st1tutt

.. ttr and nanvoletilt _,1s1f1tr

## f~r lletf'Oli'UIII distillate**o1e~111g** stoct. ·

YOC tll'iss1on P'tdUCt1ons aP't ICIOP'0&1

.. tt1y 100 Pti"Ctnt. 

# I lAS IS: The •jor cost assoe1etn wi ttl cantf'O 1 o1' YOC , s tne or1 ce Cl1ffertnee oec
... n cutDICk and ..ulsified esonalt. A or,ce**di~ftrt"tlti** of 

### 5 cent/c;ellon Siv1119s to 1 ctnt/c;allon**~:~enel** ty res:u 1 ts in • cost ef. !feet1vlfttss range of (S7J). 

### S15 per ton YOC.



### 6**-~- .\FF[C~£!)**  FA::!L!TIE:S

NUl'!!; OF**Ar::::~to** ' rA::L.IiiES SU..URY OF CTG DOCUMENT FOR SOL VENT Mt'iAL C:.EAN.ING**Th~e** 

### types Of solvent**aeq~ese~s** 

### •re •ffeeted: a. Cola cleener: lletcl'l IOICieCI, nonao1lin; solvent**oe~~~s~p** 11. 

### Ooen too vepor**deq~eser:** 

### llatcl'l 1oeo, 110111ng solvent**cSeq~uer** 

### . c. Conveyoraeo**cSeq~aser:** 

### contl nuaus 1 y 

### 1 oacleCI,**conveyo~1** zeo 

### salYeftt**deq~uer,** 

### tither IIOiltnq or nanacn11ng.

·

### ODet~ tao vaoar

### dtq~Uti"S Sllllller t111n 1 

# ,.z of CIOtn ere•

### •~•**ue~::** II 

### f,.OIII tile IOOhCJtlon of

### ~f,.;qa,.ltiCI Cl'lilie.-s 01: 

### Cll"l:IOn

### ICISO~~Ie!"~. Canveyol"iZtd dearoeiSti"S Slllllle,. tl'lan Z.O,. Of lrtr/veoor tnte

.. 4 

### ace 

### i '" llltiiiDt ,,. • P'IQut P"eNnt for 1 

### IIIJOP' conti"O 1 

### eSt• 'ce. I 

## I Estillltes of the numae,. of solvent cSeqroeese,.s n1t1onwtae for**:~e** 

## II )'eiP' 

## 19,. 11"1: 1. 

### Cola cleenti"S 

### (CC) • l,Z%0,000. b. 

### Open too veoo,. cSeq

.. eese,.s (OTJ

- Zl,OOO. c. Conveyo,.,zeo cSeqi"IIStl"s (COl • 3,700.
I


## voc 

# l EMISSIONS**~~:OK•4DE ,.~ich**  

### Estlllltts of ennual net1onw1Cit**e~1ssions** 

### .,.,: 1. 

### CC • 380,000 Mq/yr ('19,000 ton/yr). 

### II. OT • ZOO,OOO**J~IY'"** 

### (Z%1,000 ton/y,.) c. CD • 100,000 "-J/yl" (110,000 ton/yl"·) r-es»resen t. 100u t 

### 2 • 5 oe.-c111 t. of est 11111 

### te<S (14: VOC 

### emissions net,onwiCit.:

YOC 

### EMlSStON ltANGt 1t£R



### FACILITY Avel"l9td .-iss1on races**Pt~" dtq~IStl":**  

## •• cc • 0.3 

### "-J/yl" (0.3 

### ton/yl"). b. 

### OT • 10 "9/Y'" 

### (11 t.on/yl"). c. CD .• 

### %7 "'9/yl" 

### (30 ton/y.-). 100 

### TONITR 

# I DIU 

### ind1cau trllt. 

### on an IWI"I91 10 

### ooen too de"l"tiiii"S o,. 4 

### con-

SOURCE

..



### SiZE •eyartzed**cStq~asers** 

### .. ,**e~it** 

### 100 t.on/yl".**~G EM.!:~:ON**  l.ZM!-:'



### voc**~E~UC~:ON** 

### II£R FAC!L!TY



### 'COSTS • 

# I TM 

### YOC •iss ion t;,.,t ts**roec~~~~~~~enaed** 

### 1n te-s 

### of eouiOI!Ient soet'- fications end ODII"Itlon**o~ctdu.-es.** 

### Aeou,,.ea control eou10111ent can**~** 1 1 IS 

### SlmDlt IS I -.nually OPII"ItiCI •ani COYIP' 0,. 

### IS**C~~les** 

### IS l 

### ;arcon**•«~sa,.,t1on** 

### system dtoena1nq on**tl'l~** 

### tyoe, size, end e1e:s1qn 

### of t,e I**atq~u''"·** 

# I The ectu•l Dei"Cettt YOC**~auction** 

## wn l 

### very**cSeoen•~,** 

### ng on 

### tne**:ont"~'**


### , .autament 1nst•llea end the ooe,.at;onel**;~roceduroes** 

### folloPea.**~eco~~=­** 

### : eCI**cont~ol** 

### metl'lodS can rwauce YOC 11111Ss1ons**~y:** I 

### a. CC

- 50 

### to SJ 

### oer-eent (• ZO 

### oe.-centl. D. 

### OT • 

## •s to 60 OII"Cint (; 15 DII"Cint). .c. CD· 25 to 60 oe.-cent 

# (! 10 oe,.eentl.



### 7

# ....... .,.,.. 

# ...**:.r;t~-:"a.u** 

### I T-o· and tnree•OitCt c:an ,..,,.face c:oatlnc 1 1nes 1nc::.,.c:,n; ':!'It**•-~:~ITitS** 

### ;aool1cat1on al"tas and tnt dl"ylnt; ovens.**NtJ-~;;.** (,;**AFFtC-:"t~ F.\CIL!~:::s:**  

### Est1111ted to be 46C 

### affected facil it11s n.ationw1oe.

VOC j 

### EstUIIted annual t1111U10ftS fM)III can coat1nq**f~c~1i':1tS** 

### I"!**Er::ss:or:~** ·Mc;tyr \**lSO.:l~:l** 

### ton/vr) wnlcn P'IOI"tstnt aoou': 

## a.: 011"::!,': ot**':!'~! N;~:or;.::£'**  

### nat,onw,:lt VO(" ,,..,,; 

### 'O"S. r14,1Sj


### voc 

### tr.:s; :.:.:.**AA'.~£ ~~;** **;:.::~:':'\'** 

### 10: TQ:;;YR**sou~:t** SiZE


### CTG**~!SSION** 

### LJM!T



## voc AEilUc:'IOr> 

### PtA FAC!L!TY Ty,l;al annual I!I!USIOns frcitr, 

### can C:Oit1nQ lines can**"~"'1** 

### •
.. :-**·~** 

### ·•; I (**~.:** 

### tons i for 

### end seali nq to Zt:C "!; ( Z6C 

### ton) fo,. t.C.·P 1 

### e:! :lr 

### ::a:· ; in; fo,. a giant averat;e of 310**~-;** (J4C 

### ton:. I 

## j Typ1cal can cottinq facn ities u 

### ,.eol"tstnted 1n ':!'It**l•oo~acn** 

### Ol" eacaed 

### 100 TPY VOC 

### _.,ss1ons if**uncont~llec.** ·The**I"IC~ded** VOC 

### e11ss1on li•its are: 1. 

### Sheet COit1nq, t.O•CI11CI eatel"iOI" 0.34 

### kq/1 (Z.B 

### lb/;al ;• b. Two- and tlll"tt•D1ece 1nte,.;o,. 0.51 

### kq/1 (4.% lb/gal )• c. Two·oiece end eate,.;o,. 

### 0.51 k9/1 

### (4.2 lb/gal)• d.**Th.-..·~iiCI** 

### SiOe SeiW. 

### 0.66 kg/1 

### (5.5 lb/g&l)• e. End seal CQIOOund 

### 0.44 kg/1 

### (l.7 lb/gal)• 

# I The actwal oe.-cent reouc:ion will 

### va,.,. oeoenoinq on tile solvent colltent of tftt ea1st1n9 coat1nqs and the cont,.ol metiiOd selectee. lmolementat1on of the**l"tc~noed cont~l**  

### met11oas can I"ICuc:e 

## vc:**~1s·** 

### l s 1ons l)y 

# 6., to 100 Clti"Ciftt. 

# I I BAS:S;**s.~o** 

### SCflll fiC11fty YS1ftCJ tnermal 01" 

### Cltllyt1C:**InC~.,** 

### ... ,.

t1on •ltll**111"1~.-y** 

### lleat r"ecove.-y. o,. aasorpt1on**•It~ ,.ecove~!~** **s::•e~:** 

### c.-edited It fuel v•lue. 1 

### c.&PJTAL COST: S12S,OOO •

### ~162.:l00**A~::::;:.(.** 

### ; Z£0**C~ST** : S42**:J~O** • S 71 • 000 

### cos-:**EF'~EC'rJVENESS:** S1l5 • 

### S7n6 o)t!P' 

### ton 't'OC



### 8**-~. SUMMA~Y**  

## or**~G OOCUM£~~**  

### FOP COATING 

## or**M~~~ :~:~S** **AH~~£~** 

### i Cotl surlace co1t1nq lines 1ncllldtng tne eooltcatton 

### .,.us, ';!'lt :r;-· 

### ; ;..;,**::.:~I ~S**  

## i , n; ovens , eno tne Quencn 

# .,..u.



# ··-----
..**-~r-:.** •. :. 

### £sttmated to De 

### 180 f1cilities nationwide.**FAC:~;il£S** 

### ·;;::::
. Est111aUG 1nnu1l lllliSS\ons fM)III**~011** 

### c:o1t1ng facilttas lr'! 

## ;:.:::**E":~s=~~;~** .f'!;;y,. 

### (lJ,::oo 

### tor\'Yr:, wtncn r-ep,.esent 

### aoou: 0.1 

### oercl!flt of tl"•**N'-~** ;Qr,. o :l£ , lftattG n1 

### t tonw lOt VOC fill\ 

### S$1 onS. [ 14 ,15)**!~:** 

### ..



### ve;:**.,·~·"''** 

# . -·."".**AA:.~~** P£il 

## r::.::1.:r' I : Aver'IOI**enn~o~1l** 

### VOC llllis$\On fOI' i 

### typical faC111t;,- IS !5';1::"

.. 

### ';!: ! 

### to be 180**~;** 

### (ZOu 

### toni. I I !t IS**tStl~** 

### .. ttO tnat 

### 2 I 

### 10m 

### (2 I 

### 10 ft ) Of 

### C:tl**COlt!:~:** 

### •. : 100 TOI\/TP 

# I 6 2 g 2

### S~¥~~£ result in I 

### POttntlll e111SS10n of 

### 100 tons of VOC.**C~G** 

### D'!ISSlOH



### LIMIT



## voc •EDUCTION P£il 

### FAC:LITY**c:s~s** 

# I The recommenoea VOC

.. 1ss1on 11a1t is 0.31 kg 

### per liter of colttng 111n1.1s water 

### (2.6 lb/g1l), 

# I The actual percent**~uction** 

### will vary depending on tne solvent content of tne e:a1st1119 cotttnCJS tn4 

### tne control lltttnoo**sel~:ec:.** ·t!IICit· 

# l ftlnt&tion of tne**rec~noeo** 

### control attnoos**~n** 

### ,.eouce 

### vee tm1SS1ons**~Y** 70 

### to 98 11ercent. · 

# I BASIS;**~Overy.** 1 

### C.o1t1l cost: 

# I Annualized cost: Cost effectiveftess:



### 9 

# = S170,000**~** 

## s 70,00:l 

### SSl •**S9~** 

### oe,. ton VOC**:.~:£~!:~** I ,. • ..,., , •••

**~** : '-'-

.... I •'-•



# ·------- 1 .r •

**:.~,** :.
... 1

**,:.:.::1.:~:ts·** 

### vo;: I



### t"'··~·.,··· I .•

**~** 

### ... 'iJ

..

**~** 1

**,.;.":":o~.::JE** 

## I
I 

### YOC EY.::

**s~:ot..** AAt.wE

**PE~** FAClL.ITl 

# ! 100 

### TOII/YR ' SOUDCt 1 

## s:u

**~G** 

### EMISSION

L.!MIT



### YOC ll£:lUCTIOH

**P~ll**

**F:.,::_:~Y**



## c:sn **SU~'/.P.T** OF C':"u OOC:.:r:Et;':' FOF. COA':'ING OF' FABP.lC AN:

**'J!HT~**



### FaDr1C ana v.nyl s11rface cott1ng llnes inclwd1'"9 tnt

**&D:::,~a~·c~** 

### : are•s ana

**t~t** 

### ary1n9 ovens. Faor1c coat1ng 1nclwaes all

**tyDe~** 

### :• ! 

### COit1nes IDOllt<l tO flbr'1C. V1nyl C:Oit1nO rottfei"S t10 any

**:lr"Hit~n:,** 

### l

**oe~:lr"ltlvt,** 

### Or" Or'OteCt1vt toocoat aoDlltCI.ove,. v1nyl coatec: 

### f&ori: :r :

**~1n l**  **sne~u.**



### ; [s:,na:.ec annwal tll'iSSIOn ff'OfP faOI"lC 

### C:llt11"i

**ODtr"ltlO~S ar~**  

### ':: .::: rM;'vr (ll:.:::oc

**t:~nl~r\.** [15) 

### !he

**~1nyl """'~":.**  **c~** tnt

**•a:~~c ~~=-~~-** 

**1** 

### I , .. ,:.s

**ae~o.-: J~.o~:**  

### l'ic;.'Y" i:O,O')') 

### ton/y,.l. VI)C 

# ,,.Or" fat-"''

**c:~c!:·•,c-** "'!:· 

# I

**~"tS.nts** 

### aoo•1t 

## :.t.

**O!~"~tnt** 

### o' tilt

**Uti~qttd** 

### VOC er:Hslons na<:lon.::e.



# I Any bllt tile saallest fabric coat1n9 fac111t1es Sllould



## e~ceec: tm1S· !s'ons of 

### lOW ton11r of 

### VOC.
Ttle

**reconwt~oed** 

### voc lll'i 

### ss; on 11•1 

### u are :
a. Fabr"iC coat1ng 

### O.lS k9 per liter of coating minus •ate,. (Z. 9 

### lbtgal). b. vtnyl coating 

## o.•s kg per ltter of coating m1nus •ate,. (3.8 

### lb/gal ). 

## I Tile act.,.l perocent ,..auction w1ll v1ry oeoeno1n9 on the

**solve~:**



### ' content of tne 1a15t1n9 coat1ngs and tile control

**~tnod** 

### seiec:ec:.

lmaltmentJt10n Of tfte r'IC:OmmtftOIO control mtthOOS CJn r"tCiuCe YOC

**~~S·** 

### :s1ons Dy 

# ao to 100 

### oerocent. BAS:S. 15,000

**SC~III** 

### fJC111ty 1111n9

**inc1ne~1t10n** 

### •1tl'l PP''I!""'":t 

### "U'! I 

### f'tCOvtr"y or IOSOr'Dt10n •1tft

**~"ICOVer'eCI** 

### solvent CP'eOiteC It fuei

**va:~e.** 

### \ Cao1u1 cost: S1SO.OOO

- S3ZO,OOC 

### Annua11zec cost: 

### S OC,OOO- S 75,000 

### Cos: effect! veness: '14 •

**~J9** 

### oe" t::ln 

## ·m::

10**SU~RY** 

## or**~G OOCU~ENT**  

### FOR SURFA;£ COATING 

### OF**PAPE~ PROOU~:** 

:**Paoe~ su~face**  coat1nq 11nes 1nclud1nq the aoOIIC&tlon**•~tiS** anc**~~' ,r:-£~!~**  

### I d"Y'"9 ovens. The CTG dOc:UIIIInt 1001 1es to unufictu,.,nq of**ac~es1ve** 

### i:':.c:;.:-:-:::s · :aoes, 1d11es1ve lloels, ce:ol'lttc oaoe,., oootr eovt"S, ot•,::e ::oo1e

.. :**0104!~,** CIP'QOft**Dille~, tYJ)ew~He~** **~1tiDOnS,** and C)fiOtO,;f"10ft1C**~;** li!IS.

i [St11111ttC annual t1111SS1ons II'! 

### lZC,OOO**P'!fJ/y~** 

### (JSC,OOC' ::mr;n·.. :• 

## vc: 

## i tiltS IIIIOuflt, :11e lllnufactul't of

### CJf"tSS.u~t sensltlvt uoes •ne 

### i•ot"s

### ~s**£":!!::~;~:** tst1Nte: to .,.,t**26~,000** 

### "';!y,. (290,000**ton/y~).** [1111SS10I'S**'"0~ ~!'It** **~7:0to.:;j£** I CCI!lftC of**~lOt~** PI'OduC:ts l'tOI'!Stnt IOOUt 1.2 Qei'Citnt Of ftlt10ftw1C! JC: 

### j**ttr.:4S1~ns.** [I•]


## voc 

# I Emiss1ons fi'OIII tyoical PlOt!" coat1nq I ines 

## ca•, v1ry**f,.~** ZJ**~o E~tSSION**  

### 450 kq/111' (50 to 1,000 ltl/llf"). 

### A plant 

### 1111 111ve 

### I to 20 c:oa:1nq**~1nes.** UNGE P£;< ' It tS eSt11111ttC tlllt tilt lftnual avtl'lqt VOC**ti11U11~ft** fi'OIII**::IIOt~ eoatln~**  FlCli.ITY 

### I plants tS 1,480 Mg (1,630 ton).



### SOURC.. llsed on tilt diU 91vtn, a o1ant wttll one hf"•;t 11ne Of' t1100 1 00 

### iON/YR 

# I

.

SIZE" 511111 lines can esceed 100 ton/yf" of 

## voc •as1ons

..



### E M'SSION The l'tcommendtd 

### VOC emission 11•1t Is 

### 0.35 kg per liter

r:TG 

# I
'' Of C:Oat1n" 111ftUS wattf" (2.9 lb/"11). l.lMIT ., .,



## vo:: 

# I ·Tilt actual lltf"Ctnt rfduct1on will w1ry dtOeftd'tnq on tilt solvent**I!E!:lU~!ON** 1 content of tilt ti1H1nCJ coat1n9S and tilt conti'Ol lllttlloa seltcua.**~~~** ·I Irnolttntntlt1on of tilt**rec~ncecs** conti'Ol •tl10ciS 1:1n f"9duce 

## vo:**'At:~:~** e1111SS1ons Qy 80 to 99 Oti'Ctnt. 

# I BASIS: 15,000**sc~"'** fac11ity us1nq tnc1neratil)n w1:!1**or,1111~:- 'ltl~** 

,..eovtry or idSOr;lt10ft witll**rec:ove~ecs** solvtttt '"'"tee H**~uti** faiue. 

# i C.ottal cost: 

### S1SO,OOO

-**Sl20.0i~O** 1**Anr~utltzed** cost: S 60,000- S 7!,01JO 

## i Cost effect1vtntss: 

### SJ4

- S40 Off' ton YOC



### 11**"F'PtC~£C**

**;:-~:~:-:-:ts**



# ·------·

... ,.·:, •. c.. l!'olCll..!TI£S


## voc

**t~:** !S

**tO":~**

**tc:.~IONa!:!** 

### vee

**£~!~s:c~~**

**R,A~::;** P£:"



### FACIL.!TY 

# l AutOIIIOCilt 1nd liCJ"t•duty tP'UCk Sur'1.ce

**COitl~ICJ** !1nes

**tnc;:.,.e~n; ~r.e·**  ;•oollCitlon ar"ees. tne flesnoff lr"eiS,

**•"~** tne d"Y'"CJ

**~ve~s.** 

# i Tile CTG Clr'Ovtdes no ue1110t1ons bUt notes tnlt



### ~~ tMy



### 1'10~ :)t 

## i ,.euonecle 

### to convtr't •n tatStlnq ••te,.•DOr'l'lt dto 

### c,,.,.,. c::at'":;

**Sf~:!~**

t [Stlllllttd lftftull tfP'1SS10ftS fr'Oif. IUtO 1ne ltqnt. =u:y

**:~:.::• ~·a,::** 

**~lr't 90,00~**  **"~IY"** 

### (IOC,OOO ton•v,.).

**rl1-:s~'S** ICOut 

### C.l

**~e,.:e~:** :• itS: I lilt

**!t~** VO: f"'l U lOftS lilt I

**On..;.,~.** • '' I

I [I'IISStons 

# ,,.':llfl t:o-otc;ll coettnq l1nes c;111 vi"Y 

## •,..::r.: 21': ::

**~** .::: 

# I kq/1'1,. !6!JC: to 

## •.ooc lb/1'1,.). Awe,.aqe ennu•l '"''"'c,ns .,., estH!ta:e: :: ::e 12,J8C "; (2,620 tOn) Ot" SUCJtC: Ollnt.

I 

### 100 TOI'\/YI\ I

SOuit::; 1 . All uncont,.olltd co1t1nq 1 '"" It tilt &SStiiiOI,· ::lllnts .,.. 

### u:e::e: SIZE to •nt '" ucess o# 

### 100 tons of 

## voc "'"year.



### CTG E!'!lSS:or;



### L.lMIT



### vee

**atou~:ON**

**P~il** 

### FAC:L.lTY

COSTS Tile P'WCOIIII'efldtd VOC ""' 

### ss 1on 1 1•1 ts '":

•· P";

... couinq 0.23 kq/1 (1 .9

**1bl~l•l)** 

# """"s ••te

.. b. Too eoat1n9 0.34 kg/1 (2.8

**lb/~111)** •tnus •Itt" 

### c. Fintl r'tollr' C:Oittnq 0.58 kq/1 (4.8

**lb/~111)** mtnus •t:e,. 

# I The IC:tull oerc:ent rwduC:t10n •;11 very dtOtfldtnq on 

### tne soivt": 

# I

content of tile uuttnq c:oetinqs end tht contr"Ol N!tnod

**sele~o;e~.** !lll)iet!Wntltlon of tht r'tc:oanndeO •tiiOdS can ,duc:e 

## •o: tiiiiH1ons • ., ... 

### 1.

**P~;-.** COitinq • 80 to 93 Ptf'C:ent. b. 

### Too c:olt1nCJ • 

### 75 to 

### 92 Ptf"Cent. C:. rlntl f'WOI1r' C:Oitinq • not •vail&Oit BASlS: 30 

### ·55 units oer 

### IIOu,. facility •itll l>UOStintal 

### .,,.,,c,'•:y In bOtn tXlStlnCJ ODer'IClOnS lnd PQtenti&lly

**IOOIIC:~IOlt** control sySttiiiS.
C.oit.al cost: """"' 1 , zed cost :
.

**C~st** effectlveness:



### 12 

# ss.soo.ooo
- sso.ooo
.. ooo S2.ooo.ooo

- szs.ooo
.. ooo S1 .000 • S4 .000 ,.,. ton VOCI I 

# i I

:


# . I I

I 

# I **.\F~~:-:-t:**

**F'AC:~IT:tS**

**NUl"!~::** OF :

**AF;:"t:-:-~:** 

### I FAC:L!'!"l£S 1 **S~&RY** 

### OF CiG

**ooe~~Nr** 

### FOR COATING OF

**~~AL FURNf~t~(** 



### .,..ul

**f~o~rn1tu,..** 

### surhce cou1ng '"'''

**1ncl~o~cs1nq** 

### tilt IDD11Cit1on lftd flasnoff lrtiS, lnd tilt CSry1nq OYtnS.

Est,_,tecs

**1nn~o~al** 

### emtss1ons •r• 90,000 Mq/yr

**(10:.oo~ ::~r.'**  

### yr). (IS] TillS



### reornet~ts IOOut 0.3 

### otrctnt of tSt11111ttC 'IC:



### ~ISS10ftS ftlt10ftWIOf.(l']



### vee

**t~:sstc:.**

**IIAN~[** II[;! 

# I cao 

# I **Estim~ttd** 

### IYtrlgt •nnull vee tm1SS10ftS lrt 70 "9 ton) otr fAcility. F'AC;Ln'Y 

### 100 TON/YR 

### For I IIIOdtl diD CDit1nq 11nt, 

### I pllftt COit1nq (w1tll no

**:l'"~llle,.;,**



### SOURCE 1,500,000 

### m 2 (16,ZOO,OOO ft 

### 2 ) Qf 

### sntlv;ng oer ye1r would

**~1:** 

# st:£

**IOO~t** 100 

### ton/yr.

**~G** Tilt

**,..c~ndtd** 

### YOC eMission J;•;t is 0.36 

### kg otr liter EMISSION



### Lli'HT of coat1n9 •1nus Wlttr (l.O 1b/ga1).

vee Tile 

### ICtUil oercent

**~un1Dfl** 

### will varoy deoettding 

### on tilt solvent 

### REDUCTION content of tilt tliSt1ft9 coat1ngs 1nd tile

**~ontrol** 

### .. thOd

**stlt~te~.** 

### PER I-..ltllltntltion of tile ...cOIIIIItncted cDfltrol

.. tllods can

**rte~uce** 

## vc: FAC!I.:TY tm1SS10fiS lty 

### 50 to 99 

### oercent. BASIS: A 

### diD coating fac11tty coat1n9 7,000.000 

# 't' of sne 1

.. ,,; 

### oer year converting to

.. tlr'•OOrnt or tltctr'OdiOOS1t1on: 

# cosrs c.o;ul 

### con: S 3,000 • S12,,oeo Annu1lt Zld cost : Sll,OOO • 

### S 25,000



# . .. Cost tfftct1vtness. S.UO S6S1 

### oer ton 

### vee



### 13

# I AFFECTED FACU.%Tl£S
NUI'I!ER 

### OF

AFFECTED FAC1L.IT1£S YOC EMtSStOr.S NATtONiiiOE 

### voc EMISSIOrl UNG£ 

### PER

FACILITY 100 TON/YR

SOURCE

SIZE 

# rn EMISSION

LIMIT

YOC U::IUCT 

### I ON 

### P£R FACILITY

COSTS **S~AY** 

### OF CTG OOCUPIEHT FOR COATING OF MAGNET 'liRE

I 

# I ESt1

.. ttd to De



## 3~ P11nts Rltion•ide. It Is not unusu&l for a

**.,r~**



### co1tin9 P11nt to hive SO COit1niJ ovens. 

# I CTG states tNt tfl.,.. h 

### no .. Y to line- 11011 IIIUC:II 

### so 1 went , s •ct

.. 4 • ·: 

### tm1tted. ADOut Z9,SOO

.. **t~ic:** 

### tons (32,SOO ton) of solvent

**a~e** 

### usee e&:·

, **yu~** 

### Clut IIIUC:II 

### of ttus is

**c:ont~lled.** 

### Emissions

**f~** 

### 1 typic:ll

**uncont~11ed** 

### oven •ill be
**ao~r011matt1J** 

### ,. I'

**kq/h~** 

### (26

**lb/11~).** 

### Tile 1ve1'19e annuli eanssions of 'IOC

**r:~er ~:~lin~**  **•~** 

### esti-.ted to be 

### 31& Mq 

### (340 tonl.(lS)
C'1'G 1 nd i C:l 

### tes tfllt e1c:fl of tne f•c:iltties, tf

**unc:ont~llec, cou~d**  

### easily eac:eed 100

TM NCOI!ftndecl VOC •tssion 1t•tt ts 

### O.ZO

**~:9** 

### 1:111' 11ter of e:1at1n9 lrinus

.. u,. (1.7 lb/gal).
The

**IC~Il** 

### oerctttt ""uc:tton trill vary deoet"•d1n1J on tne solvent content of tile 

### existing c:01ttn9S and ;fte

**c:ont~l** 

### metftOd selec::ed

... 1•1emenutton of tM

**I'WC~ftOed** 

### c:onti"Ol •tfiOdl' c:an ""uc:t VOC

..

,sstons lty 90

**oe~lftt.** 

### lAS IS: 10,000

**sc:~** 

### facility c:ontrolltng

**v~:** 

### by use of 1nc:1nerat1cn •itt! pr1NI')' llelt 

### .-.covery. tlo t 

### ul cost: **loO~I11111U1y** 

### $221,,000 Annual t 

### zed cost: 

## sas.ooo - sns.oo1o Cost effectiveness: Sl OS • $1&1)

**De~** 

### :c)n VOC



### 14

### SLM1ART OF' CTG OOCIJI'1ENT FOR COATING OF LARG£ APPl.IANC£:**AF'Il'~:·t:** 

### 1."'9e IOPlllftCI Sllr'fiCt COU1ft9 incl11Ciinq t.lle 

### ;:lr'llllt, Slngie, or F'AC;L:;ItS,**tooc~t** 

### •oo11Cit1on**•~•s. ~fte**  

### flasnoff**a~as,** 

### •ncs tfte oven.**NU"!~~** ilF**u·~='~~·r~** 

### F'ACILI;I£S Estillllttd to be 

### a0011t 270 Pltnts ftltionw,de.

## ~--------------------------------------------------·------------~---

I



# I vo: EStlmlttd lftftllll eBISSions lr't ,2,000**~tyr** 

### ('6,000 :on1yr.·**11 !~s:cr:~**  

# .,,c,**reo~sent** 

### 10011t 0.2 Cler"cent of est11111ttd ntt1onw1Cit '10::**HA;IO~IOE** 

### emiss1ons.


### voc**E~':!SIC~. AAs:~**  

### PEP FACILITY 100 TOPUTR

SOURCE

SIZE CTG EP'IlSS ION

LIMIT



### voc**R£DU~ION** 

### PER FACILI'T'f



## c:srs• 

# I I**T~e** 

### averac;e ann11al VOC emiss1ons**•~** 

### estimAted to be

170 14q ( 

### 185 ton 

### l .**E~t,.aoolttlnq** tile 

### .aael facility data, 1 ol1nt coating 221**.~c:** 

### clothes •tsfttr' c101nets oer ,..,. would tzceed 100 ton/yr**~ISSlOnt o~**  

### ""conti"Oiltd VOC.
The**rec~noecs** 

### VOC em1ss1on l1•it is 

### 0.3' 19 Ptr liter of**c~t1nq** 

### •1nus

.. ttr (2.8 lb/qt1).
The •ctull oen:ent r'eduction will var-y deoenoinq on tilt solvent content of tne ta1st1n9**c~t1nqs** 

### and tftt conti"Ol RttftOCI selectees

... IIIIDlftllfiUtion of tne**,..~dtd** 

### cantrol •uads 

### c•n ,..duct 

### voc

. ewtssions by 79 to 

### 95 percent. WIS: 768,000 clotnes WIShtr" caoinets coned per ,..,. 11S1n9 vtr"ious co.D1ntt1ons of conti"Ol ttchntQues. Clo1ul cost: S70,000 • S1 ,%50,.000 Annu1liztd cost: (SJOO,OOO) • SJSO,OOO Cost efftc:t1¥1fttss: (Sl,050) • Sl,180 per ton VOC



### 15 '

# I 

# I

I 

# I

: !
I **St~\RY** 

### OF C1'G DOCUMENT F'OR LEAKS FROM PETROLEUM REFINERY

**EQUIPME~T** 

# -· Aff.:cte\1

**P~:trult:UIB** rertnery eql.lipment

**Lnc:l~o~din&** PWII' see.Ls, C:OIIpreaaor f ac:J.l1 ties

**~e•l•,** 

### ••al o11 deaa»Min& vents, pipeline valves, flanaes and (p. 

## o-1>• other connections,

**presa~o~re** relief ciev1c:es, process cit• a ina, and open ended pipes.

I refineries in the nation as c1f N\d!Oer of ntere were 311 petroleua afhctecl Janu.ry 1, 1979. 1 : fac:1l1t1••


## voc The eacL

.. ted 

## voc eaisaiona nationwide are 170,000 H&/year, ••1••1on• or

**abo~o~c:** 1

**per~enc:** of the total VOC ea1sa1ona fro•

**st~ltionary** nationwide 110\lt'CIUI. (p. S-1) •


### vee The potential VOC -iSSiOnS per leakin& SOI.It'Ce ran&e f'roa 1.0 to niss1ona 10 kll/day. ranK• P•r fac1lJ ty (p. 3-2)•
100 con/veer A sln,lo

**leak1n~t »o~o~rc:e**  has the potential to

.. it 0.4 to 

### 3.7 Ma

**•u~o~rc:e** •Lzc VOC/year (0.5 to 4.1 ton/yr). A refinery vith between 25 and (p. 1-J, 2-J)• 227 leaking c:o111ponent!l

**vo~o~ld** ea1t 100 tons/year of 

## voc:. A model

.. dlua

**~tze** refinery aay have 90,000 le&k1n&

**c:~onents.**
CTC: If a

**leAkln~t** co•ponent has a VOC concentration of

**ove1~** 10,000 ppa ewal••Lon :u: tne potent lal leak

**!lo~o~rc:e.** lt sho1.1ld be

**sched~o~led** l!or

..inl1aiu tenancw and repa1red vith1n I 5 ,\ayll. (p. 1-J)•


## voc !at1

.. ted to prevent the release of 1821.1 Ma/year (2007.4 ton/ red1.1ctlon per year) of 

### VOC at a .ade1

..

**d1~.~a** size refinery (15,900 113/day) by facil1c:y

**red~o~cin&** eaia»ions fro• 2933.6 Ma· (3%33.5 con) to 1114:.5 M&

**Ccalc:~o~lated)** (12%6.1 ton) per year.ll

**Collt~** lash: A monic:orin& and maintenance proJr

.. for a 15,900 a 3 

### I cay (p. io-ts)• 

## ClOu,ono bb1/day) refinery

**(Fo~o~rth** ql.l&rter 1977

**dolla~a).**

**lnHtr~o~** .. ntation Capital Cost 81800 Tut:al AnnuM II :r.ecl Collt!l 115,000

**Cn~t** Effectiveness S/H& (86.8S)tiJ S/ton (78.81)tiJ



## • Th• !tOI.Irce of the !lulllll&ry Lnfonnat1on ls the indic:aced page nuaber(s) in "Control of \/olat!le or.an1c CoiiPOI.Iftd Lo&aks frOIII PecrohtUII Refinery

**Eq~o~1paent** ...

**EPA-~)Q/2-7~-0)~.**



### 16 

# I 

# I**S~~\RY** 

## OF CTC DOCUMENT FOR SURFACE**C~ATINC** 

## OF**MISCEL~~EOUS** 

## METAL PARTS AND PRODUCTS

## ""·~·­**,.~lilt** •••

, •. l·ll· ·r.
-utacuarer• ul: l•l'l• I erw -cttlft•"Y

-· s
.. u lo

.. _ .. , ... " 

## c. s
.. u 

## •••U•nce• .a. r-nlo! -111•1"1 •· 1-trlo! _,,..,., I. P

.. fiUCM -co!**.~ucce** I• ,...,**••"•~** 

### a..- ... ct'&al cacea•"· wflJcft c•c• .. cala,**~·•** SIC

.. ,,,**1~** ]l-It, locluelve. taco'' tlloo• leciUU

.. 

## ""'ell ora •••••• ., •revl- c:rr •.



# -· •' ••.ooo••

# -~ 

# ., 

# .. , 

# .. fecli&U• i

## -------------------------------------------------·~ voc •.o • 10·· "''" 

### o • 10• ,_,,,, ••"

.. '" lor 1977. ••Ucft**.-~** .. ,... , •• , ..... ,. ea.uc**~.0** "'"CWIIC of •cac&oM" eeurce 

### ••t••c•• 1 

## ;...

... _,_, ___ ,_._.

_ _, __ -_

•. _._._-_ .. ''•

___________ j

woe •· "" ••-•• lector of 0

... kl VOC:/1 coouna IMo wo&or -ool• "·**~** 111 vnt/

.. 1 coou
.. 1- wocerl 

## c
.. Ito ••.-cc• frw

..... ,,, a locUity

.. cUUlOI 0 coo&IIIC 

# c--

of 7\ ,_HOftl oraMIC locUUy aolwDftt, :S •orcont ooU• ., wol-. '"' 1 • 10 • "· Por locUIUoe

.. uualal oa o1ocu•o.-oltl• •roc••• ella VOC: 

# J I**~-J)o** ••••1,. foc&ur lo 0. Jt kl VOC:/1 cooU111 looo wour (],0 alao1).

## ~-------~-----------------------------------------------------~-----~ I 100 ,_,,, ""

.. , .. , .. foetor of**~.)** a YOC/col

... u

.. , ... , • ···- , ...... 0
· ••rc• •••• nee or 

# l.•• • 10' a•l cooU111

.. cerloll,r _,,. •o
..**.,.,.,~** ror • 1 lcalc,.loc•l focUUy co •• • ,., ... uol 100 ,_,, .. -reo. ;.,._ 

# _____ _ CTC 

# .. , 

# .. , 

# .. Uo&c 

# ,,, .. 

# , 

# .

YOC

....... u

.. 

### c •• , •••• , ....

•· A&r • IorcH .o_U ,. .. , .. u-

•· Cloor cooc
c.
.. or laf""-' color -•o or -u -or of colon o"U" l. 

# ,_01'

... u
.. o 

### z. OCI\er
•• Clll&

... r
........ _ .. r.
or oon- porfo-• Cl\oroctorloclce

•·**,,.~** .... , celet' 

### eta•••·

..... -· "' ce1oro -UM, or fine cHc
• 1111trao&M lorr- •••cl'aCe

Proc- -lUcoUoa

,.,_, 100 cr•c-c 

### o.o\ ka/l 

### co.• a/aou o. l6 

### ke/1 o.o llolaoU o.,,z kall "·'**'~'•""**

Pal'canc rMucs!e Ut !!!C 

## •1••'•• (CMUIIII

..... &-C clloa.a) )0••1 to. 

# l

1 por facUlty



### ,,. z-u• 

# ·-----------------------------------J

, Cooca 1 

# <••· J-1 co I J-141• I ,,.,., "_,,. euo coauaa 

### u
.. (- 743.000 

### .z,,,, -a • to• u:l,rl ! wltl\ al•d• or
- ... , _ .. u
... uellla o--
.... ,. "--·· or •ttray•coac •••11caci
.. e. 'ftte ru1•• c-..r sM coce of -r•& dUierooc VOC: c011trol 

# .,u
... a. C:.•tcal CMt 1110001



### 17 ZO•l,l17**SL~Y** 

## OF CTC

**OOC~~NT** 

## FOR FACTORY SURFACE COATINC OF FLAT WOOD PANELING

lllfPC:Ud focl11U.,.

, 11 l•Z>•



## --·-·· j,.

..... , ,,, i of foe: toot

· racUltioo l (p 

### •-:>. n,
.. ·•' rc-. "''' '·" 1 1111 • .- .. ore '"ccor&vo chat •urf••·or coal ,.,. foll-lftt. IVP"" "' flat WOOd

**p~nelo:** •· Horcl-d plvovood 11. Portlrloooorcl c. Hardboard 

# ···-l

·- --- .. - ···---------------------1 M.!.•r.J•d FacUlcleo

o. Har4w00d

**111~** 11. Porclcloooarcl c. Hardboard Moclonvlcle Tocol Z47

10 67 

# ------+-·- - 

# -·-·-------------------1

. voc •·• • to• "IIYr (9.) • 10• coae/yrl ooci

.. c.O for 1977 which ropr
.. onco

**~ouc** 

## o.s percent of ocaclonary oource ooc1

.. ced 

# .. , 

# .. , 

# __ ,, .•

coolon• l••tl-Lclo

**~---·** 

# - 

# --

... 

# ______________________________________ **~**

l•c••lon ronp por roc IItty IToole 

## z-z I'•

**:-~).**



# ----- 0 

# ,_,,r
urt-e elao ol.cul.ocedl ""toncl•l VIII' 

## •••I••''"'• ,..., coecoll ourfaco oroa are:
u. to '" 1.1.1 lo.a/ IIICl .: (0 .I co Ul. S 111/LOOO feZ)
""'"'""'"• "" ct

.. roouna/curlttl llooc••• oo ... 

### u oo tho coouns -cerlala -·"·



# _____ .. ___ 

# --------------------...., ll.'laod 011 the Vnt r•tooLOII ron
.. oboft, o 100

**~Oot** A

**elnl~** OllftUOl thrOUtltiiUC of: 

### J.e • •o• co 1.1 • 

# toa •coadorll , ... ta/yr Whore • •toadorcl panel to Z.97 

### .Z ClZ feZ).



## ·-··---+--------------------------------~ I C'TC 

# ! .. , •• , ... U•H j<11 vh Prlncad

**her~** 'l,vood

..... ,.rClC'IC"IIOOrll Nacurol r&nlOh h•r._.,. 'l'I'VOOII

Cl••• 11' ftntahoo for herd•

.,.,,.,. IIIIMilna Aeco

... ndod 11•1ceclon Z.9 aa vOc/100

**.~** (6.0 111 YOC/1000 fc2)



## s.a •• YOC/100 

### .Z> 

## uz.o n VOC/1000 rcz>

4,1 as VOC/\00 

### .Z) <10.o •• VOC/1000 rczl



## r,~·--·-- **-~-;:-;;;.;;,** 

# .. , vnc: _, •• , ... r.oucc1on, doi'Oftdi•s 011 coauns reclu•· c '"" 

## :P•r faclllCy 

# I . 1 raole 2•1 II· 2•4)• 

## ·-· 

# --- Co•c• •(Toole l•Z II•

**~9)•** I .. cvrLol Aftd cov•raae, chrou&h yeo of ¥ator•-.ffto cooci•l•• lnc&noroc&vn, auavrllcloa, ulcrav&oloc curlas or oloccr.. •••• cur&na.



# ~:::::-------l---------------------------~~------2------------~,i •-lolyr: 2,000,000 4,000,000

**~-** 

# -· **00--r-----r----+---....,..---~** 

# I Wocerllortte



### ~----·-------·~------~--------~------~------~

l.:o"col '""at 

# !
($11)00) 

# j

**~~:::~:··** 

### .. """t
Co•c •"""' ,.,,.., .... fS/Ma) 2119 CS/conl Zlolo



# -- • ·-··· •·- • ---...1.--·----__JL.....

____ _L

__ .. I 101 UV/WocenftrM W•cerbo"'•l UV IWor•rb""'ei U5 5% 155
124.6 

### :oo.a %34.4

Z9:Z 

# :z" 264 264 ZlZ :ZloO

eon-.e •-rc.' of tho a-ry lnforwoUon Lo ctle lnd1caced 11•1• n.-or 111 "'Control of

Valoctlo OFaonlc '•l•olon• fr

.. ta1oc1n1 StaC1onory Sourcao, Yoluoe Vll: Factory

**~urf•ce** CooC1nt of Floc Wood

**PanoUn~&,"'** !PA-450/Z-711-0)%. 'noflnJtlon on p. vll of F.PA-450/2·71-03%.



### 18 

# r

# r

I 

# l


# i

I



# I ! 

## i 

## I SUMMARY OF CTG DOCUMENT FOR MANUFACTURE OF SYNTHESIZED 

## PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS



# ·-·- Affected Synthed7.o:d ph.•r-co:uUcal

.. nufaccurlnJ facil1t1el. Specific· fac111t1

.. •ource• include: (p. 

## 1-•>· 5. P'Uten l. Df'vera 2. ReactOf'l fl. Extraction equip.anc ], DlacUlation Uniu 7. C.ncr1fur;e• 

# "·**Ste~ra1•** and tranafer 8. Cryecalli&an. of 

### voc M\&Uer of t.ca.

.. cad 800 plant• nationwide affected !ac111Uee (p. 1•2)•
VOC lO ,000 Ma/yr (55,000 tona/yr) eati

.. ced for 1977 which**r111~reeen~s**

..

le•lon• aDouc 0.3 percent of ltatiOn&r)' IOUrCI e&ti

.. ted VOC eaiaa :Lon•

. 

# .. nationwide


### voc Hot aveilaDle laiaalon ruse per fac1l U:y .100 con/yr Not evllf 1&D11 IOurce liae


### c::c 1. a. Surface condenaara or equivalent control on. venca f'ro. .-Laaioft reactor&, diatillation O!laraciofta, cryacallizerl; c:en- 11ait trifusea, and vacuua dryers that eait 6.1 klfday (15 lb/day) 

# <•· 1-5). or •re VOC. h. Surface condanaer• aysc
.. et certain**t~erat~o~re** ve:rluS VOC vapor preaaure criteria. 2. Additional "1M1clt1c eaisaton reduction& are required for air dryere, production equip

.. nc exhauac sysc•·•· and scorase and cranafer of VOC.
3. lncloeuraa or cover• are recOIIIeftdad for rotary vacuua f1 Ltere, proceaaa.ns liquid conca1n1n1 VOC and in•proceaa tanlta. 4. R.a11air of coaponents laak1n& liquid a conca1n1ns 

## voc.
voc 

# I Moe ava1laDla reduc t1oft per fac111ty
Coau C.p1tal and Annualized Coat ara11h• are provided for the following CYII

.. (pp. 5·14 of control equ1p

.. ftt: conaervacion vents, float in& roofs, 'l)riiiUrl to 5·42) • ••••ela, carbon**ad~tor!lt1on** syece
.. , theraal and catalytic lli\Cinerat1on eyece
.. , water cooled condanaers, chilled water and brtne C1)oled con- de1taere, freon cooled condeneer1, packed bed •crubDers and 'itlftturi •crunhere.
•Coat effectivaneea data 11 DOt calculated for tY!Iical plantll • 

# •

nte •ource of the 1"-rY lnforMC10n 11 the indicated pase (I) in "Contrlll of Volatile Or"anic !aiaaione fro• Kanufacture of Synthesized Pharaaceuc teal ProcluctJI," EPA-450/2•78•029.



### 19 I I 

### ! 

### I 

# I I 

# I I
I I 

# I



# I**S~~y** 

## OF CTC DOCUMENT FOR MANUFACTURE OF PNEUMATIC RUBBER TIRES ;:;;:::t:d •
.. 

## ·r-;:;,~:r-t;·rc• **llllln.uf.~c·t~;l-n&** p1o1ftU • producing pa11sen·;e·r· 

# :·a;: and lignt

. 

### I fact Utlell ;and 

### -dt 11111 

### cJutv truck tire».

**~eraUonll** 

### aftected are: undertread

'I 

### (pp. 1-1. 

### c
.. ent1n&, head

**d1pf'1n~.** 

### tread end cementin&. and green tire spray1n&. 1-)).



# -

**~UIIIber** 

### or

**~x1•u•** 

### of

**&~** 

### rubher tl re plants nationwide affected facill tie11 ( p. 2-2). 

## I voc 1976 

### VOC .-iaaluna rstimate from rubber tire

**manufactur1n~** 

### totalled

ew.ia11lona 88,200

**~/yr** (97,200 

### tona/yr). This quantity represents 0.6 

### percent
: nationwide of total national VOC

..

**i.~1ona** 

### fra. stationary sources. 

# i (p. 1·2) • 

### I voc The averaae tire plant ia eaci

.. ted to rclaaae 4,000 

### Ita per day 

# I elliaalon (1,820 

### lb/day) of e•iasiona or 1,000 

### Ml 

### voc per year (1,100 

### tona/y't').

ru1e per 

# I facility

(p. 1•2).
100 

### tona/y't' The •odel plant, producin¥ 16,000 

### tir

.. /day, has potential to emtt ·!IOUrce size 1,460 

### "a/yr (1,600 

### tons VOC/y't'). Therefore a plane producing approxi•

(p. 2-8) •


### .. tely

**1,~)0 ~ires/day**  

### would be a potential 100 

### tons/yr source.
CTC 

### VOC

.. lflalona reduction

**fr~** 

### the affected operations 11 recommended

..

1aalon throuah uae of ·carbon adsorption or incinerntion. Water-baaed coat• Uait 

### ln11

.. Y be uaed for green tire 1praytna. (p. 4-2). ..



### voc a. Carbon adsorption ttves an overall efficiency of 62-86 

### percent in reduction reduclna VOC OMissions, when applied to the affected operations. per f 

### acill ty b. Incineration &ivea· an overall efficiency of 59-81 

### percent when (p. 1-4) • 

### applied to the affected operations.

c. Water-based concinas. applied co green tire sprayina. provide an overall

.. lssion reduction efficiency of 97 

### percent. Coats 

## !!!!.!!.: A 

### IIOdul 1&,000 

### tl't'es/day rlant us1nJ the various control

**(;~p.** 4-ll. 

### tadlnolo&Les recommended on the followinv, affected operations. '-lS) • All coAt» are b

.. ed on January 1978 

### dollars. Unuertread Bead d1ppin& Tread end 

# I Creen tire

**ce~~~entin& ce~~~entinR**  I 

### •T'rayin&



# - I 

### Coapl tal COflt 130-340 115-250 135-375 j 15-450 ($1000)
I 

### Annuali aod e·o" t 92-280 70-985 100-340 

### i 118-490 

### I ($1000) 

# L CoAt

**~ffwctlvenc~fl** I 

### CS/!1&) 166-505 1.4:10-ZO,AOO 1.140-3.880 202-839 

### (S/tnn) 150-458 1,340-11,800 1,000-3.500 

### i l84-i63



## __ ._ I 

### *'The ooour•:l' nf tnt: "-ry 1nfunution t"' 

### the 1nd1caced rtaai.'(S) 1n "C:ont't'OI

of VnlatliC! OrJienlc

**Ellll•u•lona~** 

### fro111 Manufacture of Pneuuci.; Rubber Tires " EPA•4 50/2-78•0 lU. •

20 ' I

' I I I I

: 

### i

I 

### i

I '



## !
l 

# I

I I 

# i**-~.** 

### Sl1Ml'1ARY OF CT\. DOCUMENT FOR EXTERNAL FLOATING ROOF TANKS

**-------~··-------·--** 

# ----- j Afhct•d

1 factlHlee I (p. l-Z>.

I NUIIIDer of

afhcud fac:ll1tln (p. 2-l).


### voc

..

iaaion• !'\oU l Omt l de (p. 1-2).


### voc em1aa1on ranae porr facility (pp. 3-3. 3-9).
100 tona/yr BOGrC:e liZe


### ere

**a~1aaion** Umlt (pp. 5-l,

**~4).** VOC· r'tductlon per facility I ( pp. 3•3,

3-9). r.,,.ta (pp. 4-9. 4•12} • 1 F.xternal

**nn:~tlns:** roof tanks larger thaa 150,000 liters (40,000 jtal)

I I I 11toring petroh.•tllll liquids. See exceptions

**not~:d** 1n text.

There 1• an c!tlmatcd 1J,800 internal and external floating roof tanKs that are larur than 150,000 liters (40,000 "al). The numoer of external floating roof tanks ls not available.

An eatimated 65,000 Hg (71,630 tons) of VOC

**v~** emitted in 1978 which

**re~re••nts** about 4.0 percent of stationary source estimated emisaions

.

The

.. 1aa1on ran•e for a 30.5 • (100 ft) diameter tank storing 41.4 kPa (6 pai) vapor

**prc~sure** aaaoline 1a 212 Mg/yr

**(~33** tons/yr) for a slightly gapped priaary seal to 2.2 l'tg/yr (2.4 tons/yr) for a t1gir\t r1-mounted •econdary seal over a

**ti~ht** priaary seal.

No llln•Je rloat1nK roof tank ill expected to eait 1110re th••n 100 tOnM/yr. I '• 

### A

**cont1nuou~** secondary seal nr equivalent closure on all

**aff~cted**

**~toraae** tanks, piU8 certain 1napect1on and recordkeeping requir

... nta.

Ran.ea fro. anout 200 to 2 Hg/yr (220 to 2.2 tona/yr).



### !!!!.!.= Ex.tL-rnal floatlniJ roof tank J0.5 • (100 ft) in d1.&Mter with a capacity of 8.91 • 10 6 Uters (55,000 bbl) contrc1lled by a rtm •ountL-d

**S~'"tJnclo~r; ac~l.**  r.apltal coat ($1000) Annualized c:osc ($1000) 16.9 

### ).3


## I (&6);. -3,655 I ($/ton)

**(59)~-3.316**

.._ ____ ....J... •.

_ .. -------· -----------------·------- -The 11ource nf the 'luftllary lnfnl'ftUJt lon is the indicated paRe(s) in "Control of Volatile

**Or~anlc:** Elll111,.iuna fr0111 Pc:trnleum l.lttuid Stnrase in External F'loating Roof Tanks," EPA-450/2-78-04,7.

**~umoer•** ln parentheaia indicate

**c:r~dlts.**



### 21

## SUMMARY OF C!C DOCUMENT FOR CRAPHIC ARTS

-**ROTOG~~VURE** 

### AND 

## FLEXOGRAPHY


# ,. -

ACft't"ted 

### r ac 111 t l "" : (p. ,_, )• .,__ 

# __**)lullllt~r** nf

aH•cud

, fad Ut**1~!1** 

## '(p.:-s>• F'1t'aoar:af'h h· .mol**rutu~r:avure** prncesawM :arr lied to pub I i c."lt Inn .uul**packa~ln~** prlntlnK.



# - ··---- 

# -------------

.... Puhllc:aclon prlntlnr. 1!'1 done 1n lar;e**pr1ntln~** pl•lnL

.... ,,,.,.,.r,,.**l~sa** rhan 50 ln**toc~l.** h. 'nlere are ap.,roxi-cely 13 co 14 thousand aravure rrtnt111.· ""'**~** • and )0 thom1and flexoKraph1c pr1nt1ng units • 

# ..__.---**~----** 100,000 Mg/yr 1976 (110,000 conA/yr)



### voc t'Wila111nn111 nat lnnwldr (p. :-R) • h. .10.000 !'11/yr 19711 C'lJ,OOil**con~t/yr)** 'nlla repreaenc,. abnuc 0.8 pvrcl'ftt of**~c.uionary** 11ource , .... t lm."lt••i t•aJ !IIIII l"Onll. I I 

### L .
·-·-- -· -----------------·------- ---

voc c•l••lun r•nar per faclllty (calculatl.'d)

, 100 tona/yr !.!lourc• 11Ur

I C'TC ' -i111alnn 

# i llllllt ., I (pf'l. I•. o

l•'J) •

I 7.4 11,;/t•rlntint; •anlt per year (IS.:! con11/un1 t) 1 "&/prlnttna unlt per Y'-'•r 

### (1.1 tonA/printinc unit per year)

A plAnt will ht'**~** rot•nti:al 100 cona/yr VOC source 

### lC it uses 110•180 Ma (120-200 tuna) or Ink pl'r year, where the solvent concPntracLon IM**~0-85** p•rcenc.


# ·-------- ""• uf water•hurne ur hillh l'olld!l lnka ••tlna certain**~:..,lllpos1tion** crita:rla or th._..,, •• nf capture and cont'C'ol equ1p-nc which provides:**;~. 7~**  pt'rct•nt nver•ll VOC reduction where a rub**Uc~1t** ion rutocr:wurt' proces11 ls _,loyed: h. 65 J'l("rct•nt ovcraJ.l VOC rcductlon where a packac:l.nK rocorococr:avur• rroce1111 Is .-ployed: or,

c. 60 p

.. rc••nc ·overall VOC reduct I on where a (**leXOSI~aphi** C

,**prlntln~** procc11a**L~** employed. 

# 1------- ···-r-------·· - . ·-- ---

voc:**s.~** ;a" I:TC: I htlt MOV('.
: rl'duc:t l "" 1

## ~-r~r.~l 

# u:_L__ 

# I

I 

# --l**~** 

# I

- .. - -- --. - -- -------·**----~-·-** 

# -1------

- VIIC ,.oncru1 urt Inn 

# I incinerator 1
1 . Incinerator '

# ,,d;~:~~;r:"" .

# ad~~~::·t": .. 

# m\ Co11t11 (pp. 4-11 4-1 )) • tnk uaaar. ,../yr 7 1 C

ton8/yr) ( 7. 7) 1' 

## z.soo (2,7S0) 

# I vee concentration pp• 

# i 500 

# r

ca,tcal cost j
Annua 11 zPd """ 

# I ')4,000 24,900 

## soo l,ltO ,000

1 1.66S,SOO J,SOO 0,8&0)**I.~oo** 701,000

7::,!100 7,1011 (**~.** 7:'11

:,:.nn
70 I ,tlOO 

### ( .:.1. 

### ;nn,-. 

# l l C:OII C t' (( IIC' t l VC"ft

.. llll 

# ----. - ·--**~.l- -~~~..**  

# --- .. 

# J 8,)110 

# L
t,liSO 51**'-·-~_7_o_ -~·-'·-"_o**  

# __ ._ ____ "'_,

__ _ I I 'ol I l I)
""The oo<IUrct• nf tht• 'lulllll:lry lnfor•at lun ,,. thto**lndlc:1t~d** paae n..-ber 1n "'Control or

Volatile OrJI&nlc f.lllllllalunM fro1111 F.xllltlnr.**!'ic;~Clonnry** Source!l, Vol111nr Vl.[l: c:r:\!'hH Art111 Rntoaravure .1nd**Fh•xn~:r.,phy,"** 1-:PA-4')0/2-711-0)), Numer• In p11renthe11es aro.o savlnKfl·



### 22· 

### ..**SU~Y** 

### OF CTG DOCUMENT FOR PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING SYSTEMS 

# r -.,;r,:c·t:

.. ;-
... 

# r**·.~.--f·c·;t·,;-f.u_.l.l.lll•··:~,;** ..

## .-·~-~ln-oper.'l;::;-:..:.:.:~~-:~nu**·i·n-dulltr.l.·;l-~~** f"'t'llltlt'"' · clf•:mln•: SV"f<'lll" whlc·h lit( tlllf' perchlnrnl'thylent: o'lS

.. utvcnt. \fl. 

## :-n• I Scanh('r of 11ff 

# •c ted f ac111 t 1es \calculated) a. Col n-u1• h. co-crclal c • l ncJ us t r t n l

. 

# --. -·-. 

# -------------------------- J.:.,<JOO 44,t.OO ZJO

### ~-----------·-------- \'OC .-mil'"'llt'ln"' nationwlut• \ i'T'. l-.!. :-1) • ,,. Coln-np 11. CUIIIIIII!t'Cl"l .:.**!ndu~ttrlal** 21,400**M~/yr** I Zl ,000 Mr,/yr

11.600 Mv,/yr (23.500 tons/yr) (135,000 tons/yr)

(15,000 tons/yr)**Th~ ~stimated**  158,000 

# '*'• VOC/yr is 0.9 p•rcent of total stationary Mource**t'"'t1~tecJ emi»slon~t.**  

# 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------

voc em1a11ton rangl' per facility (p. S-2) • 

# ,,. h. Coin-up**COIIIIII~trt:lll1** 1 r. lndu11t r loll Uncontrolled VOC emissions 

## !IL.ll 1,460 ),240 32,400 (lb/yr) () ,200) (7,200) (72 .000)

# ------rtndu,.tri.'ll dry cleanins; plant,**procesain~** 750 Ma (825 tons) of pt'r**y~nr,** would be 11 potential 100 tons VOC p•r year**s~urc:e.** l00.tonll/yr 

### A**lar~t'** aource**•iz~** cloth•• (extrapollltrd):


### err.
em t '"' I nn limit ( pp. Il-l 6-4)"'



## voc reduction per fac:il1ty (pp. 2-5, 

### 2-7)• .'\. Reduct tun of ·.,.fryPr outlt't concPntration to less than 100 ppm VOC, hy**meun>~** uf c;arhun**~d!llorpcion.** (Facilic:leR with inade<Juate**sp~c:e.** or !ltl•:am cnpnc 1 ty ror adsorbers are excluded.) h. Reductlun ur VOC: t-llllisllions frr:. filter and distillation wastes.

c. F:l.lm1nntt• llquid**~nd** vapor leaks.**C~rhon** adRorptlon "PPlicd co commercial and lndustr1al plants will rt'duca**ov~rall** VOC emis,.ions by 40-75 percent.

Carbon adsorhars ror a c011111ercial**pl~nt** cleaning 46,000 kg (100,000 lh) or c:Jothe!ll per year.

# i~' I C.lp Ita l c·n!lt $4.500 Annuallzcd cn,.t 5300 

# .__

__________ L

_**_:_~·::'_t_i_v_c:_"_•_•_s** ______________ 

## :_:o_o

__ :_:_::

__

# :_:_~M-~-:" ________________ .....J

rnte "nurc:t· or thr "u11111ary lnfC)t"ftation 11'1 the indicated page nuft)er in "Control oi

VolatJl•**nr~11nic ~~ia~tlon,.**  from Pucnloroetnylene Dry Cleanina Systelfts," EPA-450::!-18-050.



### 23

### SUMMARY OF CTC DOCUMENT FOR LEAKS FROM GASOLINE TANK !RUCKS AND VAPOR COLLECTION SYSTEM 

# -----T----·------·---------·-------------
1 Affected 

# I facilities

(p. 2)• a. C:aaoline tank c ruC"ks that are equipped for va.-or colllect ion.

I 

# I :I!UIIoer of

affected facUitiea


### voc •iaa1ona naC1anv1de 

### VOC ••iaaion ranae per facility
CTC

..

iaaion l1J111t (pp •. 1 and 2)



### voc reduction per facility
Costa 

# I b. Vapor collection systeiM ac bulk terminals, bulk

**pla~ats,** and service atat1ona chat are equipped with vapor balance and/or vapor processing ayatna.
Not avail&Dle

Noc available

Noc available

The control ;approach is a c0111binat1on of test1na, •on1tor1ng, and .quip- ••nt desi111n to ensure that ROOd

.. 1ntenance practice• are etll1)loyed to prevenc leaks fro.. truck tanu or tank ca.partMnta and vapor collection ayat- durinR guoline transfer ac bulk planta, bulk terminal•, and aervice atac1ons. A leak is a read1na areacer than or equal to 100 .. percent of the LEL at 2.S cm from a potential leak source as detected by a combustible gas detector.
Not available

:.lot avallab le
-The aourc:e of the summary information is the indicated pa•• number in "Control of Volatile

OrJjanic: C0111pound Leakll from Casoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Sy,.tema," EPA-450/2-7R-051.



### 24 ' ' I I

' ' I i 

### I I I

' 

# I I 

# I**Sur-~1arv** 

## of :Tl; Document for 1·1anufacture of Hi gh-Densi 1:y**~c1y~thy1ene, ~Jlypropylene,**  

## and Polystyrene Resins**~~~ECTED** 

## FACILITIES: This CTG applies to emissions from certain processes in the manufacture of high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene.

CTG**E~ISSION** 

## LIMIT:

CGr:7?.0L TECHI!ICUES: The manufacture of these three**polyr.~ers** 

## ctrl! estimated to account for 53,000 ton/yr of VOC emissions or**56~** 

## of emissions from all types of polymer manufacturing. Typical size uncontrolled plants could emit: high density polyethylene polypropylene polystyrene 2,100 tons/yr !i, 

## 700 tons/yr**:~60** 

## tons/yr The following emission reductions or limitations are considered representative of RACT: (1) For polypropylene plants using liquid phase processes: a 98 we.ight percent reduction or reduction to 20 ppm of continuous VOC emissions from the polymerization reaction section (i.e., 'rE!actor vents), the material recovery section (i.e., decctnter vents, neutralizer vents, by-product and diluent recovery operations vents), and the product**fini~hing** 

## section (i.e., dryer vents and extr.usion and**pel~letizing** 

## vents). (2) For high-density polyethylene plants using liouid phase slurry processes: a 98 weight percent reduction 

## or reduction to 20 ppm of continuous VOC**e~issions** 

## fror the material recovery section (i.e., ethylene recycle treater vents) and the product finishing section (i.e., dryer vents and continuous mixer vents). (3) For polystyrene plants using continuous processes: an emission limit of 0.12 kg VOC/1,000 kg product**fro~** 

## the materia 1 recovery section ( i . e. , 

## proc1uc t devo 1 a ti 1 i :e'" system). F'lares or thermal incinerators are the mc)St commonly used control devices. They can destroy 98: of the streams ducted to them. Condensers are often used on polystyrene vents. These can control 95: of the VOC 

## emissions passing through**the~.**



### 25**CC~7f::OL** 

## COSTS: 2



## Cost per ton of VOC controlled is a function of the uncontrolled emission rates. The CTG gives emission rates (in Kg VOC/Mg product ancl rig/yr) above which the control cost is SlOOO/Mg or less. Similar cutoffs are given for S2000/Mg and S3000/f·1g. A State may choose to use any cutoff which gives an appropriate level of stringency.

26I J 

## ,- Summary or· CT!.i Uocument tor VIJC LeaKs from SUCMI/Polymer Manutactur1ny**~FFE~TEO F~'ILITit$/**  

## APPLI,AtHLITY:

wtu**~MISSiuN** 

## LIMIT:**Equi~ment** 

## in VOC service in**~rocess** 

## units**proauc1n~** 

## synthetic organic cnemicals listed in**SOC~1I** 

## NSPS anc manuracturiny**~olymers ~nd**  

## resins; Applies to VOC leaks from process equipment: pumps, compressors, valves, open-enaeu**11n~s.** 

## sampling connections, safety relief devices. Equipment**s~ecirications** 

## and**inspections/maintenanc~** 

## requirements: 1. Cappiny of**open-end~d** 

## lines (except when in use) 2. Quarterly leak detection and**re~air** 

## ot pumps, valves, compressors, safety**reli~f** 

## devices 3. Kepair components**appearin~** 

## to leak on oasis of sight, smell, sound 4. Less· frequent monitoring tnan**quart~rly** 

## for valves in gas or lignt liquid service 5. Weeklt visual inspections for indications or leaks from pumps in light liquid service 6. Monitor safety relief devices after eacn**over~r~ssure** 

## relief for proper reseating

27

## Summary of CTG Oocument for VOC Emissions From Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners**~FFE~T~U F~~ILITit$/** **~PPLICAtHLITY:**



## CTG EMISSiuN LIMIT: Petroleum solvent wasners, dryers, solve!nt nlters, settling tanks, vacuum stills, and other containers and conveyors of**~etroleum** 

## solvent usea in**petro1~um** 

## solvent dry cleaning facilities. Applies to all petrolttum solvent dry cle!aniny facilities consuming 123,000 

## liters (32,,500 

## gallons; or more 

# or**~etroleum** 

## solvent annually.
1. 

## Petroleum solvent dry cleaning dryer·: t:itner

o 

# vue limit of 3.!;) lb of 

# voc per lULl lo 

## ary weight of articles dry cleaned Or

0 

## Install solvent recovery dryer 

## 2. Petroleum solvent filtration system: Either

0 

## Limit VOC content in filtration wastes to 1 lb per lOU lb dry weight of 

## articles dry cleaned Or

o 

## Instal I 

## cartridge filtration system; drain filter cartriages in their sealed housings for 8 nours or more before their removal 3. Repair petroleum solvent vapor and liquid leaks witn1n 3 work1ny aays after**iaentift1n~** 

## the leaks

-k;.__ 28·k:-::. 

## Summary vT 

## CTG Llocument tor VUC Emissions from Air Oxiaati1:>n**Proc~ss~s** 

## In Syntnetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Indus1:ry**~FFECTEU** 

## FACILITIES/ APPLlCAtHLITY:**~.u** 

## EMISS10N LIMIT: 

# .. Air oxidation r'acilities witnin SOCMI,**incluain~:~** 

## all reactors using air as oxidizing agent to**~roauce** 

## an oryanic cnenical. Includes any**e~uipment** 

## (absorbers, aelSIJroers, conaensers, ammonia/HCl recovery units) used to collect 

# vue for beneficial use or reuse (for sale or recycling) For eacn air oxidation process vent stream, eitner:
1. 

## Use combustion**devic~** 

## (e.g., tnermcll oxidation, flares, boilers) to reduce VOC emissio,,s oy**~o** 

## we1ynt percent or to 20 ppmv, whichever is less stringent;
OR: 

## 2. Maintenance of total resource**er'tectiven~ss (T~E** **1** 

## index value greater than l.U (TRE is a measure of cost**efi~ctiveness** 

## of controlliny air oxidation streams**~1:~** 

## a 981. 

## combustion device (thermal oxida1:ion). A Tr<E incex ot 

## 1.0 is equivalent to a cost**eft~ctiveness** 

### or 

## SltiUU/My (198u 

## dollars) of VOC emission reduction)

29

## Summary ot' eTli Uocument t'or VOC Equi!)ment Lealcso From Natural**Gas/l.idSOiln~ Proc~ssiny**  

## Plants**~FFtCTtU** 

## FACILITltS/**~Pf'LlCAIH** 

### L1 TY: 

## Equil)ment in vue**servic~** 

## witnin a tJroc:ess unit in onshore natural gas processing plants. Equi!Jment leaks rrom**~as** 

## tJiants are vue emissions tnat result when process fluid (either yas or liquia; leaks from 

## plant**equi~ent:** 

## pumps,**cornpr~ssors,** 

## va1'1es, pressure relief devices, open-ended valves or lines, rlanyes ana connections,**gas-operat~a** 

## control vaives. RAeT applies only to equipment containing or**contac:in~** 

## a l)rocess stream with VOC concentration ot' l.U**perc~nt** 

## by weight or more 

## CTu tMISSIUN LIMIT:**Equi~JR~ent** 

## StJeCifications and**inSIJ~Ctions/maintenance** 

## ·requirements:
1. 

## Quarterly monitoriny of pumps, valves, compressors, and relief valves 

## 2. Weekly visual**insp~ction** 

## of pumps 3. Repair any component that appears to be**leakin~** 

## on tne basis of siyht, smell, or sound 4. Less-frequent monitoring than quarterly for dift'icult-to-monltor valves 5. Capping of open-ended lines (except when OJ,Jen end is in use)
6. Lealciny**compon~nts** 

## should De tagge<l dnd re!)alrec witnin 15 

## days or at next. snutdown.

30

## Summary ot' eTli Uocument t'or VOC Equi!)ment Lealcso From Natural**Gas/l.idSOiln~ Proc~ssiny**  

## Plants**~FFtCTtU** 

## FACILITltS/**~Pf'LlCAIH** 

### L1 TY: 

## Equil)ment in vue**servic~** 

## witnin a tJroc:ess unit in onshore natural gas processing plants. Equi!Jment leaks rrom**~as** 

## tJiants are vue emissions tnat result when process fluid (either yas or liquia; leaks from 

## plant**equi~ent:** 

## pumps,**cornpr~ssors,** 

## va1'1es, pressure relief devices, open-ended valves or lines, rlanyes ana connections,**gas-operat~a** 

## control vaives. RAeT applies only to equipment containing or**contac:in~** 

## a l)rocess stream with VOC concentration ot' l.U**perc~nt** 

## by weight or more 

## CTu tMISSIUN LIMIT:**Equi~JR~ent** 

## StJeCifications and**inSIJ~Ctions/maintenance** 

## ·requirements:
1. 

## Quarterly monitoriny of pumps, valves, compressors, and relief valves 

## 2. Weekly visual**insp~ction** 

## of pumps 3. Repair any component that appears to be**leakin~** 

## on tne basis of siyht, smell, or sound 4. Less-frequent monitoring than quarterly for dift'icult-to-monltor valves 5. Capping of open-ended lines (except when OJ,Jen end is in use)
6. Lealciny**compon~nts** 

## should De tagge<l dnd re!)alrec witnin 15 

## days or at next. snutdown.

30

### ATTACHMENT 7

EPA PROTOCOL FOR CALCULATING DAILY EMISSION RATE FOR AUTOMOBILE AND**LIGHT~DUTY** 

### TRUCK TOPCOAT OPERATIONS (TO BE PROVIDED)

### ATTACHMENT 8

APPENDIX D. NOVEMBER 24, 1987, FEDERAL REGISTER

### F.deral**R~** 

### I Vol. 52.**~. ~e**  

### I Tuesday.**~vember ~.**  

### 1981 

### I Notices 451!5

lnfonnation far PropoNCi Standards.

## EP.-\~13-G-01~·**'1~=·Paru** lor



# • s.rsace Colllllll 0

### ~-- WedUn•• 

### aadQvound lnf .,..... for**Prolt~d** Stana.rds.

-

### ~ga.Dec:ealber 1915. 

# D': =ociaeGDcally R.ac:uve Orwanic Co...,-d .EJDIUiaaa From CODIWMr and 

## c,nuraereal Prociac!S. EPA 90:/4- 86-401-lftPiftd by EPA Repon 

### D.**~ove,.._UM&** · 9. Evaluaaon ola PaiDt Spny 

### Booda t:talluiiAil Rean:Wation.**EPA-&00/~** 86-14!.

10. 

### BeMfit. of Mic:rDprac:euor Control ol C..CDI Oveu for Solwnt 8aHG Coatmp.**EPA125/:~t.** September 1914.

The EPA Ration IV hu prepand. with contractar u1iataDee. a nWIJDer of reparta OD 1pecific DOD-C'TC IOIU'Cel ill sped.fic cities. Thue report1 descnbe control techDOlOIY wbicb is available. The reparts lilted below were prepared by EPA Rqion IV.

.



## u. Volatile Qrwaaic Compound Control at Specific Source1 

### to Louilvilla. Kentucky ud Na1bville. Teuesaee.**EPA-901/e-11~.** December 1911.

Thia repart**dila&~an** control tec:hnolou for th

... indUitries: Wood Fumitun · AlUIIUDwn Rollina 

### MiD Lubricant

Control Fiberwlau Reialorced Polynter Boat

Buildint (Sr,rene Emiuioaa) 12. Tedmical S1qtp011 ia tbl Development of a Reviaed Ozoae State Implementation Plua lor AtlULt&. Ceo11ia. preparwcl.for EPA Retion IV by Pacific: Environmental 

### Semen. EPA Contract No. 

### -..oz-3881. Aupst 1915.

This report includes: ArchitecturaJ Surface Coatint Automobile Refinisbint Commercsal/Consumer Solvent UH Fuel Combustion Cuoline Volatility A1rc:aft Emassaons**De~Jreasan@** Lawn and Carden Equipment

!3. Summary Report for Technical Suppor: :n Development of a Revised Ozone Sla!e Implementation Pl3n for**~.1e:nplus.** Tennessee. prepared for EPA RP.o;:on IV hv Pac&fic En"**.ror.me~tal** Ser·.**;r:e~.** EPA Cor.mu:t :-.lo. 68-0:-31187. 

### ! ;ne 1985.**T~1s** mult&·volume report ar.cludes: 

### ·::o.,d Fum&ture Coauna !l.;r!e LoadiniJ Fac11ines**Sh~et** Fed P:.perboard Coauna C!lem&c.Ai Process1n1 Plants Soh·ent Extracuon Offset Litho@raphy Buik Plants

14. Tecbnicallnformataon Document for Technac:al Support in Development of 

### a**~** 

### Omne State tmpll!ftll!'ft'tation Plan for**B~ilam.** Alabama. prepared for EPA Repan IV by Paci5c Enrironllmltal Semees. EPA 

### Ccmtract No. tii-OZ-3881. 

### nM 

### canmtl of a series of 

### repam poablished in OctDber and Noftftlbfor t984 and febnaai"J' 1985. Irntastaet coftl'ed include: Surfaca C".oatiq llf**~11•** 

### A.ircral1 PaiDt ManllfactUDIII Coke Procasaes Lamination 

### 41 Vlnyl Coutertops MineraJ Wood Productioll lndUitry Bnck .Naaufactwin11ndu.atry Explosives Manulac:lvnnllnciUitry

A number 

### of CDIUZ'Oltec:Anolae documents 

### haw beu wadely 

### CU'C111ated
as dralt doc:umentl for review. Some of these docwnelltl have never 

### beu iaaaaed as final docwnentl sucb as 

# crc·. for variou.a 

### rnaona. but they still contain much helpful technical ialormation. Copin of aome of the1e may be still available from EPA. espedally from the Emissions Standanb and Ensmearm1 Diviaioa 

### of the Office 

### of Air Qaality Plaraai.q and Stuadarcia. AIDOIII th

... are:

tS. 

### Draft. 

### ""Contz'Ol of Volatile Qrwanic: Compouad EnUaaiou From Full-Web Procua-Colar HeatHt Web 

### OffMt Lithapapbic Prinliftl, •• Aquat 111ft.

1L 

### Draft. '"Conaol Tecbaique Cuidelinn for the Coaaol of Volatile Qrwanic Emiaaiona From Wood Furniture Coatins." Apriltm.

11. Draft. -Fabric:**Prilltiftllnda~** BackpoUDd lllfonutiDil for 

### Ps..,......t Stawdarda

... April %1.1181.

18. Draft. "Economic: Impact ADaly.ia of Catalytic Incineration and Carbon Adlorption on the Fabric Printint lnduslrf. ·• November 1111.

19. Draft. "Conaol of Volatile Qrwanic**Emission~** From Existins Stationary Sources: Paint Manufactllrins Industry

... U.S. EPA. OAQPS.ln addition. EPA"s Air Toxica Control Tecbnoloty Canter bas issued the followinl report:

::0. Air Strippinl of Contaminated Water Sources. Air Emisaions and Control. July 20. 1987. Prepared for Air Toxacs Control Technoloty Center. U.S. En\"tronmental Protection**A~reney. ~.esearc!l**  Tnansle Park. North Caroline**Z~ll.** PIJtllntiol**Nt~tv** SoutT:tl**nr~,•it~w** (.\'SRI 

### .\1easuns

The primary approach a State could follow to mattwaae the effects of IJI'OWih by reductions throu1h its NSR PrGRram would be to sub1ect more sources to new source rev1ew.

The followan1 meas!olfel are beina sugested for States to consider in their control stratqies aa appropnate techniqun to deal with pwtb. Under current rales. new sOW"Ces and mocfifications may be exem;11ed from tile 

### Pm 0 major NSR l'l'qlnrements by: 

### Ill Hnina a potmtial to ennt beiow c!!'tain threshold.s [100 tons per year (tpy) for new sources and 40 rpy of 

## vee for modifications to lt'nsnnw ma1or sourcesj: (2l not beans locatn 1n an area desipated u nonattAu:uaent Wlaer section 107 of the Clean Air Act !Act): and**t31t~tUalifyins** for one of the spectfic exemption• contaaned 1n 1be NSR rqulatioM (e.s .• conversaOft to municipal wastes for !)ower generation. produc:tton**inc:rea~es** not linnted by a permal. increased OJ)er&tlftl noun).

Each of these situataona has 1 se!)arate set of pesstble solunons or**revision~.**

(t 

### 1 Th,.shoJds- The thresholds contained in the NSR program could be lowered to. say. 25 tpy for major sources and major modificataons. A significant portion of the total VOC em1ssaons aenenrily come from small sources. so lowerint Qtof& would bnna sipific:uatly more of the VOC emission• into the major NSR program. Evn 

## zs rpy threshold may not COYer 

### a majonty of the emissions rnulting from new aourca. One study bas ahown that for VOC's. modificationa and new IGW'Citl eauttiqlen than 5 tpy compese 55 percent of total new VOC emissions.

(%) L«:Gtion Ouuide Nonatt4inment ..4nro-States may 

### wish to apply the non.nainment area I'CSR req'airementl of aec:tion 

### 113 of the 

### Onn M Act (and State programs under that section) to aources located outsicie but near desipated nonattainmant U"eas.

· (3) Sptlt:ifir: uemption- The definition• currently contained in the NSR program exempt certaan increases in emissions from beina constdered as a modification. These exemptions allow sources capable of accommodating allemalive fuels or raw matenals to swttch fuels or raw :natenals [e.g

.. from oil to coal) Mthout betna sub1ect to major NSR requirements. Also. sources may 1ncrease thetr operaung hours i e.g .• £rom II hours per day to :
.. hours ?!r**ua~·l** and**throut~hput** (!.1

.. from 00 percent of CIIOiiC&tyl to !he mu:rmum pnss&ble whtle mee:sng**F~der3i** :":SR r.:qu&remP.nts (unless the**c!t:1n~es** 

### ilre**sp~:csfical!~·** limlled b)' Federal**~tnfurcuble** cnnduionsl. Slates could**~emo,·e th~se**  uemptions from :he :":SR rl!gula lions. Appenciix D-Discrepancies and lnc:onsiatencin Found in Current SJP"s

The EPA has rev1ewed a number of SIP" 1 and found inconsistenCies and discrepencin from established EPA policy and pidance. The followina

### 45108 Federal Register 

## I Vol. 52. No.

**~6** 

## 1 Tuesday. November

**~4.** 1987 

## I Notices discussion lists the moat prominent problems and sugests corr.cuons to these problems. While no State or local &@iencaes arw specafically identified. EPA intends to discUIS individual State and local deficiencaes wuh the appropnate asenctes at the ume the SIP call is made.
o. :4cllieve Consistent Implementation o.f.Vew Source

**Rev~ew** Programs

Dunns its audits of State and local 

### ;..;sR programs. EPA has found consaderable differences 

### an how agencaes tmplement thetr NSR regulations. EPA has found. for example. that many ma1or modifications. of sources escape preconstrucuon reV1ew and tbat lowest acluevable enussaon reducuon (1...-\ERI determinations for sources subject to NSR are often inconsistent and insu!ficiently slrinsenL In many cases. these problems may result from improper interpretation of the applicable rules. To minimaze the likelihood that this will occur in the fuiW'I. EPA ·mtends to develop pidance on such issues as how emissions increases and decreases should be calculated for nettm1 purposes. when and bow implementing asencan may use 

### lfOW1h allowances as a substitute for offsets. and how to ensure that best available control tec:hnoiOI)' and 

### LA.ER determinations reflect the best tec!mology for the soW'Ce in question rather thaD simply the new source performance standarda control leveL The EPA also intends to increase its auditing and enforcement 

### ol State programs. Sew Source Review Repletions

The primary focus of the new soW'Ce review retulanons IS to evaluate the emisSions ampact of new or modified source projecu before construction commences on the projects. The basic requtrement for a new source of air polluuon 11 to ensure that 111 emiSsions do not cause any new nonattaanment s1tuat1ons or exacerbate any exasung nonat1a1nment problems. All sources must "prove."

**g~nerally** by modeling air quahry ampacts before and after the proposed c..,ange. rhat they do not cause or conrnbute to any non.1ttamment j)roblem. For ma1or new suurees .1nd ma1or :nod1ficauons washar.g to lccate •n desn;nated nona11a1nment areas. the apphcant must also show that the most smr.l!e.,t pollution control equtpment

**!l.A£.~1** is betnll installed. that all other sources owned by the applicant wllhtn the State are in compliance (Statew•de compliance). and that the emisaaon 1ncreases are either offset or t<lken into account wath an approved growth allowance (emisSJon offsets). These requirements are listed in the Clean Air Act in sectaons 17% and \73.

The wording in some State NSR

. regulations allows or has the potentaal to allow certaan sources to avoid some or all of the antended requarementa of new source revaew. Thts IS in conflict wath the Federal provisions. sance State rules can be more strinsent than the Federal provtsions. but tn no case can they be less stnngent. The EPA belie.ves that appropriate guidance and technacal support can help ensure that

**S.t~tes** implement the new source revaew reiulationa in conformance w1th 

## EP.a. policy: however. States may need to correct or clarify some of their repletions to avoid possible applicability or enforcement problems that may arise under new source rwview due to less stringent provisions. The followin8 areas are the focus of efforts to achieve conformity with EPA policy. Exemptions

Pemrit Conditions: Federal requarements state that only federally enforceable permit conditions may be used to exempt a soW'Ce from the requirements for major sources. State operatinl permits and State consent decrees arw not federally enforceable unless incorporated into the SIP either through EPA approved case-by-case rulemakins or throush • aeneric mechanism. State preconstnaction permits iuued by States under EPA· approved SIP rqulations pursuant to 40 CFR 51.18. 51.%4. or 51.30. as well as constrw:llon permits issued by EPA or by delegated Sl<ltes under 5%.%1 arw federally enforceable.

Slate NonottDJnment Designations: The EPA will not permit a State to exempt soun:es located in nonactaanment areas that the State has des•gnated "attainment" wathout EPA approval. Similarly. States wall not be permatted to use attaann1ent demonstrattons that have not received EPA approval to determ1ne whether .1n offset or nettins transilctaon 11 cons1s1ent wuh RFP.

Ceneral.· States should revtse

**the~r** re:;ulattons to

**rem.:~ve** any regul.uury provasaons that could be used to e:\e:r.pt any source from .1ny ma1or

**:\:S~** requtremenrs. The nnly

**e:ot.:iuston~** .t>.! those contaaned in the Fl!ul!ral definations of major sta:t:'"ary 1ou•r.es 

### f-10 CFR Sl.165(al(llfivll or m11jor modifications (40 CFR 51.163(H!IlJ(vlJ. No source type (e.g

.. cottcn g1ns. resource recovery facilityJ or source claas (e.11. reactivated sources) may have a blanket exemption from any new source review

**requirem~tnt.** This is a problem under the major source and major modification thresholds. sance the NSR provisi,ons requare that all emu11on increases be1 accumulated for applicabilit)• purposes. For e:umtlle. 01 stngle cottora gan may be a l!unor source. whale four Cl)tton gtns (under common ownersllip) locannt on one

**p~ece** of •ana would consmute a major source or major modiliication. States may retain exemptions from mmor source permittang r11quirements if ( ll there exasts a federally approved growtn allowance tCII mangate resulttng increases in emissaons and !ZI State regulations expressly prohtbat the use cf the exempnc1ns to e:ocempt any ma1or source or ma1or modificanon from ma1cr NSR requtretnents.

Clean

**Spo•~** E:cempt1on: As a resuit of the Aupst 1iiHIO rulemaluns whacn was conducted u part of the Alabomo Power decision. State regulations cannot contain

**prov:~sions** that exempt a source from major new source

**rev~ew** requirement•, wnl!re the source does not "sianificand)• caUie or contnbute to a violation of 1, Nauonal Amb11nt A1r Quality Stant:iarci." The August 1980 requirements subject any ma1or source or major modification located in an EP:\ designated Dt)nattainment area to the major NSR

**re~quirements** regardlt!ss of the ambient impact of the source. Some SIP's. howevter. still retaan this exemption alltd should be reV1seci. Offset/Nettin11 Requirements 111

Of{seu: The EPA requires State reguJations tc1 contain enforceable and specific cnter;a on the credibality of emission red"ctions 

### as offsets. These provisions must lftclude a specific. well· defined baseline for emassaon 1ncreases and decrease:s. a requarement that ail emiSsaon redttctions used for oifsets be federally enfc1rceable (see secuon on perm1t condit110ns

.. ooveJ. certain

**rl~!ltm:uons** 011 the use of emiss1on reduc:tons

**t:a~::;ed** by pl'lor shutJowns and

**curt;ulmenr~** 

### .u off$cts

... nd the pmhabiuon of thP. use of 1ny em1ssaon reducuons 01lreauv

**n~clud~d** 1n a St

.. re "'""lnmP.nt

**d!"naonsrr~ttmn.** Tl:! !.1st rftuuarement

**li!ll~u** as ro .msure

**:~c11** a !::a•" dOt'S

**~"•lll :.~sea**  reuur.uon rwr:e. i.e

..

..

**~·** .• ;
... ,. r · - 1 1 • •
... ,,,, ur •"';:

.. •·
.. ••t •• •••!"'·,: : •· ''"•'" ltn

.. t

**,.....,,.,~htft** 

### ,,;

**,..,~**

....

**••~o·-** .. -.· •••·-••.,1 .1:-'"'lnlf !:"'nfft

**~~IP** tfttl·oto:J"\

...... , .... , .. ••• ;..:• \

**~~** , ... .,) prurth:!.;.tflun ui

... ,:
... .,J '·'M

**~** ,1

.. , .. ·.,',,-

. :. ·•
...... ._.

**""•"'~"'** :·

...

**~:1•** \. \..1

.. **~Ill!** 

# I' r.: r..· f-"•• 1 •'"'''"'"'' t

**t-t:~** -: ,, ·•h•t

**'"··-~**

**·~** ' ,,., •. ,,.".,

**~** .. ..,. ... " .;!'fi·.a.: \ • .:.
.... :S. :•Nrtl i tt'Uf'U

...... t

**f'~\** tnft•f 

### n.,
... ,_.,

**\f~~-·1** •• ,J unul F.l'-\

**;,~** • ."!v

**r.~\tM"4 ~:'\It**  **rt·~t•\,a"t** ._.._ • .,.::.•na uw c-trr.?nt

**rl'q.,ert~•ll'.-tt••** :-
.. m.un '" 

### ,..r
.... : 1!"'

**"'·•~··**

**r.twft~** •ts ,...u
.. uu"t ,.., m.-.! ,-. ..

**,~ •l'flu!~""''**  41ftd 

### EP., '"""

........

**'"~** 

### ........ **\11:'~-fUI** l)Ur4Y.If\l 10 lin• C.\1

... .w•tle"'••ll

**~.,,...,...nt.** F.P

... wul .;;.,,. ll'te $C41n tO (ft41ft1M

**t~etr** 41P:tiiC•ht• fft"u•l••tft'4

..

**~** •PIIfOPn••e

### Fearal

**Rti~i•er** 

### I Vol. 52. 

### No.

**~e** 

### I Tuesday. NOYember 24. 1987 

### I Notice. 

### 45107

once 

### Iar .aua&nmeru purpoaes aad once fat JIUUpliGII a{ DeW IOIII'CI 811JWI.b.

**.\'~tt:llg:** TheDA 

### ,..aaraa S&&te re,W..uona to coatain spcdlc and enforceable 

## en len& 

### ii a SIMe w11aes to allow • source 10 ·•net out

.. 

### ai majar

**~SR** revtew. A sou.rce '"nets ol&t"' ol ma joe new source revaew by secunns

**~masaion** deczzaaes wuhan the

**so~&rce** to mlllsate ancreases from the same source. reswtinw m an ''iDaignilicanf' emisaioos anc:rease on a sourcewide baaia. The Federal rewulations require the fo11owins c..,:ena for nenana: (1) AD "'actual"' baseiine: (!) health and welfare equwaJence between the emission anc:eases and decreases: (3) Federal enforceabality of enussiOD.I decreases (see secuon on permit cooditions above): 

### 1"1 a specific contemporaneou ume frame (up to 10 yean): and (5) the prohibi.Lion on Lbe use of any reduC1.ions already incorporated in a State' 

### a attainment demonstration (see discus11an on aUseUineabove). The health and welfare eqwulence senerally focuses on the concept of air quality: the air quality eff.ects of the propased nenm, action mut resul! in equ1valeat or inqlroved air quality. For ''statlle"' pollutants. this places 

### an emphasis on dispersion. For an ozone nonanauunent area. the ralative

**reacn~ties** of the VOC species also plays an important role in air quality determinauans. The State 1hould not allow a nettins tr8nnctian that causes an increase in a reactive VOC and a· decreue in I nqlisibly reactive VQC even if the ab1olute 

### unoant of VOC emuted does not increase sisnificandy. The contemporaneous timeframe ia needed to ensure Lbat increases are accumulated over 1 reasonable period of lime. to discourage constnaction projects

**~:ootempUniJ** themselves from NSR. and e:"'sure that decreases are not so old 11 to aiready be taken into account in .:llliiinment demonstrations. Also. if a rll!t.h.:c:aon occurred a very loniJ time ago. t!':at reducuon should IJO towards

**..s~•~llniJ** an arl!l to show attainment

**r1:i':~~** tl'u1n asstsllnfil a source to avoid ::-;;.,,r 

### :-:sR requtrements.

**O~::;~!t:ons**

**~** 

### ·cc. '.:SR rP.!:l:!ataons should use a • ")C: .:e!:n.uon that defines VOC as all •· ··;
.. ,.ec compounds

**e:otc~pt thos~**  that F.r· '.

**~** .. s :isted •n tiS Federal Refiltster
r.
...

**:.r.~s** as nonphococ:hemacally reoctive. IS.,., VOC defintlion tn RACT f"!.!UiiillOftS diSCUSSIOn.)

**Ut!·~r.** :'liSR rP.sulauons should contain cio,oJr defintttons. consiStent wtth Federal

**r~:q10arements.** for the followcna terms: St.,llnnary source: actual em1ss1ons: ..tllowilble em11saons: fuanive emassaons: cmr.mence or be111n construction: buildina. &truclura. or facility: and major s1a11onary soarca. State rerulat.ions that do not cOIIlain IJOQd.

**conc:~se** definitions that meet the Nderal requirements risk truti.Ds sources meqwtably 

### becaUM of varyiaa uuerpretatimll of the definit&aftL For example. minor var1at1ona in a State ntle resardins the 1.A£R deftrubon wbic:ia appear un1mportant cowd allow a source to avoid installina proven technolOSY by arsuina that it costs too much. a result that it unacceptable utna the EPA defirubon. The definitions mut provide a framework to make decision• replicable amana SOI&rcel. Small Sources



### LDt:k of Minor

**So~•** 

### and Minor Modifit:tztion R11view: AI required by the Federal rules. SIP' 

### a should require a review proaram of aU sources of air pollution reaardleu of aize. 

### Thia review must indude an auurance that no new source 

### ar modification wifi interfere with auainment and maintenance of .the standard as wen as a requirement that all constnactioa projects be subject .to public comment procedure. Many States only have reqwrernants for major sources and major modlfications. Slates may only exempt minor

**so~&rces** from these requirements if (1) there exiata 

### .a federally approved srowth allowance to militate resultina increases in emissions and

**~)** State rerulations expressly prohibit the use of exemptions to exempt any major source or major modifications from 

### NSR requirements. 

### b. EnsUI'fl 

### Conformity of 

### SIP

.. With EJcisting EPA Policy



### Althoash most 

### 'SIP rqulations have met tbe terms of EPA'a requirement• for Part 0 plans. EPA may have approved some SIP's containins rules that do not meet those requ1rements.

Some State rqulations controlling VOC emissions are beins implemented in a manner that is not consiStent with EPA requirements and policies and can. in certain cases. significantly anterfere wtth the effectiveness of those re3ulutions. These amplementahun problems appear to be caused b}•

**::~correct** or ambiguous definmons. \.ilrlilble interpretation. the lack or key pro"'IScons (e.s

.. comp!ictnce

**llm~s. t~!lt**  methods. etc.). or spec1Cic pro
.... •sions '" St:1te regulations that are t:lc:ons1stent wllh current EPA policies. In

**so~e**

**c:~ses. th~se**  problems can interfere wuh the States' ability to (1) secure their e:oo.pected umlis&ona red:.u;tions from sumon11ry source RACT regulations or 121 control em11saon srowth throuiJh their !':SR resulations.

**~A** plans to work wuh States to identafy these problem areas and provtde traan•ns. auidance. and

**~ther** teciuUcal support to msure that RACT aod 

### NSR rquiauons are effectively irnplementltci. Statio:aary Source RACT Regulauona

The existing RACT regula lions were develc.ped as a major component of the SIP su·ateg1es to achaeve VOC tiDISIIO • reductions. The followtng 

### ciescnt:n th.: areas where RACT rqulauons

**hav~** been 11dopted and/or amplemented on an inconsistent basis. RACT Resulation Exemptions

Mar1y of the C7C's that 

### EPA issued :n the late 1910's recommended that States e:tmnpt from thear RACT ru.ies oniy those :IOI&rcet falling below certain s1ze or thrctughput cutoffs. Other CTG's recom:mended no such cutoffs. Some of the 

### R.JrCT rqulations now in the SIP's. howe">er. establish exemptions wader than 

### than recommended in the CTC's or pro•nde exemptions so ambtauous aa to be s1usceptible to abuse. The 

### EPA wtll requi.r!t the States to amend such ru.ies to ensure: 1hat these exemptions conform to the C'l'C recommendations in aU cases except: 1hose for which the State provides adequate jutificauon that the CTC letvel would impose unreasonable requir1aments in that State. DefiDi:tion of 100 Tons Per Year Source

The EPA p.idance has called on SIP's for ext:ension areas to require RACT for source:s with the potential to emit mora than 1100 tona per year (tpy). but that do not fall into a 

### CTC category. Althouah EPA ilatended the deranit.ion of source for thi:1 purpose to be the entire plant. some l)IP's are suscaptible to an

**interpt~tation** requinns RAC7 only for individual emisaions units emitting more than 1100 tpy. Also. some SIP's are

**susce~ltible** to 1 readins under which the source, must apply RACT only if it has a potential to emit

**mor~** than 100 tpy witn controls. EPA intended. however. to h;n·e Sit.ues apply RACT to non·CTG source'S

**~mlltlft~** more than that amount wllh0\11 controls. Therefore. EPA mtends to reGiure the relevant Stales to

**ame~d** \'OC r-.:les that do not

**ciu~iy** rellect F.P..s.·s intent. Ot!lc:r

**ls~u~s**

**1::,,),11~8** \'OC rules Ci>nt.un a \·;met}' of Otht:r itmbtguJIU!S

**c~nd** eump:wns

**tho~t** :nn impede elfrJrts to ac:hte\'e !uil R

.. \CT·ie"·el reduc:ions

.. ,lthoush some of the alfected State or local agenc:es currently interpret these !'\lies consistently wnh EPA poiacy. courts w11l frequently tum to the actual words of the rules to decide the legal obli!lalions of the affected sources. For that reason. EPA believes ilts essential for States to

## -......__. 

## ..

**~--** 45108 Federal R.,Pster 

### 1 Vol. 52. No. :::6 

### I Tuesday. November 24. 1!187 

### I Notices

amend these nales to state clearly what is requ1red. Untalthe States change these rules. lhe A1ency will conunue to Interpret them consistent wuh EPA's 1ntent when 11 approved them and wall encourage lhe relevant State or local

**awen~:~es** to do the same. Examples of these

**defic1en~:~es** are descr1bed 3eneraJiy below.

.

Em1Sszon /.Jmll Units: VOC rules incorporaunw lim1ts expressed as pounds of VOC per sallon (lb VOC/sal) of coatins should also list the equavalent lb VOC/sal of solids emisa1on limit. It 1111111 be acceptable but not mandatory to totally replace poundt of VOC per llallon of coalinl untts w1th unata of lbs VOC per sallon of solidi. VOC rules should state that un1ta of lbs VOC/sal of solids be used for all calculations involvins emission tradei. cross-line averasina. and determanins compliance by add-on control equipment such as incinerators and carbon acisorbers.

Eumpt Solvents: Compliance calaalauons for coalinss expressed as lb VOC/gallon coatins (less water) should treat exempt solvents such aa 1.1.1- tnchloroeihane and methylene chloride as water for PUiliOses of calculatins the "less water" part of the coatins compoaition. VOC Definitions: These rules should define VOC as all Of'IIDIC compound. exceptthoae that EPA has listed as photochemically nonreactive in ita Federal ReSister notices. Many rules incorrectly

**co~tain** a vapor pressure cutoff (e.s

.. 0.1 mmHaJ that effectively exempt• some photochemically reactive compoUDds (such as butyl dioxitol. a paant solvent. and certain mineral oils) from control The followins definition is a model for use:

**Voiat1/~** OIJflniC: CDtrtpound tVOCI-Any oraanac compound wllrcil parlltlpatn '" atmo•pllenc pllorocilemacal nracuons: that 11. any

**o~anac** compound oilier than those wiucil the Admanasrraror dntcnAres '"' hav•n1 neljiaa:ble pilorochemrcal reac:uvny VOC mily

**~** meuurP.d by 1 nrfenrnc:e mer!'lod. •n eq:.uvaaonn merhud. an alremauve mttthod or by

**~roceciunr!** soecafi01d

**under~** CFR P:m 60. A

**!'t!fe~e!"~e** me111011. an

**e~uJVillent** merhnd. or an

**••ll!~iiiiVI!** mf!\hud. howevttr.

**m;~y** ilhiO

**!:\~asurll!** ,onnrac:Jvll!

**,~.,nat** compounds. In

**•uc~ ~a•ll!s.**  •n own'!r or

**•Jper;~rnr** m•y ea•.;<ul! the nonre•c:"·• 'lrtilnlt c:umon11nds

**wnl!~ ue·~!'!!Un•nc**  comp!a4nt:t w1:h •

**~-** ..

**~.;.rd.**

Ot

...

**~.- D~>'inmons:**  A vari11tv ,f other dttfi:IIIJDns tn VQC ru!O!S are ;nconSilltent Wl:h EPA's crc·s. EPA proposes to a\lenufy rhttse defic1enc1es and requare the Stares to remedy them.•• a

• •• ' ''

.... .,. .... ct.f1ntt•.m• of ··ctwttnc

.. ,... .. '""viO ftnl

... etnpl '"'"' COtltrfli CINIIIfiC llllft lh411 .lo ftOI

**~•••** O•il• .,,_,, AIIO. d•hlloiiOfll of -.frllollltn' "' IIIOICellaMOul ,... .. , CINIIIIIJt ruMI Tran6{t!r E.f/iciency: Transfer efficiency is a measure of how efficientty coauns solids are applied to the objects beins coated in spray coatins

**operation~.** lncreasans transfer efficaency reduces the amount of coaling used for a panicular JOb and may thereby reduce VOC em1asions. Some States h.ve attempted to provide sources with credit for transfer efficaency improvements.

The EPA proposes to require that sources be allowed to 1eelt credit for transfer efficiency improvements only if tne SIP specifies a baseline transfer efficiency and a test method acceptable to EPA for determanans actual transfer efficaency. (The uae of defaulL assumed or table trantfer efficiency values would be unacceptable.) This could be done eather with pneral or source-specific SIP revisions.

Ctw6 Lint! Av•raging: A source may use c:rossline averasing only upon (11 EPA approval a• a source-specific SIP revision or (%1 State adoption under a cross-line averasins or equivalency rule that EPA has approved senerically.

CDmpJionc. Pt!l'iods: VOC rul11 should describe explictly the compliance timeframe aasociated w1th each emiuion limit (e.s" instantaneous or daily). However. where the nales are silent on compliance lime. EPA will intei1'NI it aa inttantaneous. The rules could include period• Ianser than %4 hours only in accordance with the memorandum from John O'Connor. Actina Director of the Office of Air Quality Plannina and Standards. dated January 

## zo. 1984. entitled "Avera1in1 Times for Compliance With VOC Emission Limits-SIP Revision Policy.·• and only as source-1pecilic SIP revisions.

Recordkeeping: The EPA would require States to amend their VOC I".Jies to require explicitly that sources keep records needed to assess compliance fllr the timeframe spec1fied 1n the rule. Records must be comm"naurate w11h requlatory requirements anJ mus: IJe ava1lable for elltammatmn nn re"lllt·''l. 

### Thl! SIP must l!IVe

**re~porung scht~l.luitt~**  '"'''''d :n.eA• c..iear th.,r

**·:n·la~~··** .,, ·f;n.! .,,i: ="'" :"t•p

.. tr

**tJ~** IJrl.ftft•f

... IUtpm.ftt

**l'!".,ft•J(,tf"ltl~** 11 ft•lf ,..hn••h•nc. R,.hnt•hu•c "'"'

. .; '"'

......

**:w~·J** ... :
.... :-";»:ur.unc ul u"'fll!'d

**~mD~··nt.** T:te tJttrtnu

... n of p

.. ,..., cn.une thoui.J be rPtmttd to

..... , ..

**r~.~** .• , :h.ll

**~~~.** 

# '.uMt co.t:f't ,...:ui•t•nns r.u""' ,....,.,.'""'•" pl.,.uc (;1111 •nil -o
.. lhc ''"' "' 

### ••II .os ""11•• p,,.,..,. •nil j,.bftc cuom:ae •h•ould cnv.., ••rurauun

**fl~r•UIHI•** •• WIPU •• liru,;t1y

**crw~::-2** oltf•r.trutnl. \ '""' COAIIII• defo11Uon111 ollu11id "'"••

**~~~"'** :fto1t

**-~111101** and

**plo~tUIIII ~llliUn••**  twh

... n ""'"''nn

.. Uw lwv• COftiiOIIIOhl hllllt or 110 101"""' I c.on"'>l

**~** 11"'d

,., buhhlot ltlllo..,OM '"'"' ""'!II 1tro11:o11• .ol'd ltlllt:08Irt1Jt. C...lllllt-uld boo

.... foMd Ill oiiChod• "func111111al" •• 

# -11 ••II"''"""" or dolr.orau•·• filma. and reporlting formats. For e:ocample. these rule:1 must requ1re dilly recoras ,f the SIP

**re•~u1res** daaly cumphance. If a company 111 bubblingats emassaons on " da1ly bati:t. the rules must requare

**d;~aly** records to determane compliance. If units of lb VOC/lJallon soiads 1s used :n calculatioau for daaly compii: nee. tne tource must record gallons o. solids used per d.ay and pounds of • 

## ·oc ematted per day. The rules should

**t~lso** require sources to list separately

**t~e** amount of diluents and. where relevant to

**determ1nin~** compiiance. wash and dean-up VOC. Beyond that. they snould require sotJrces to document (1]

**:~::** :ne coalinss manufacturer used euher EPA Method %4 or an EPA-approved Stille method to calculate the amount of VOC per sallon of coaling (less water and exempt solvents) and (Zl what meth.,c.i the manufacturer used to calculate the volume percent solids content of the coatinss.

T•st M•thods: EPA wlil requ1re States to amend their VOC rules to requare :he use of the molt current test me!nods to determine the VOC content oi coaungs (e.s .• EPA liteference Method

**Z~** (l·hour bake) or ec1uivalent ASTM Methods!. The method uted to determane voiume percent sollids should be specific and should be 11n EPA-approved method (see "Procedures for Certify1n8 Quantity of Volatile 0111anic Compounds Emttted by Paint. 

### Ink. and Other Coaungs," EP.o\-

**450/~9.** December 1984). The procedurett in outdated ASTM methods and the Volume II CTC are generaily no lonser acceptable. Procedures should specify tha.t EPA or States may ver1fy test data submitted by compan1es wun independent tests and that EP.o\ or State conducted tests w1lltake precedence.

The EPA will also

**re~qu1re** States :o :otmend th1111r VOC rules to sta:e the procedures: to be used to measure r.apture dnd control device

**eificu:nc1~s.** 1-'or

**Udmp~e.** the rules for sume

**type~** l.li'

**~ources** or cuntrnl systt?ms shouiJ r:!qu1re the use •Jf temporary enc:lr.su:eo;. r.l!!ll!r than miHP.rli\1

**bt~lanr:,.~.** 1!'1 :.Jptur'! ,.;;:.-
.. •ncv tests. P:o\'is:ons thoit

**~··~·11rl!** "w

.. lll!!"ll!lnle"rP.I.i

**c.1~•ture s~·s:o>~:;**  · M "J:\.P,Jmum reaa;una!:llt! c .• prure ·

**.~** .•

**~:J** be

**rt!p:"~:e\1** ··"''h •pcr.u'i.: control II''

**II~** ll't't:'l l'!lt !1.

**i~_,;,,.-;:u,.~t L.t~':.;.**  Cvr.·.::,,,,,_•r·

**·~·. -:·~,.**  f':'.\

..

**~** •. 111 requ•r"'

**c<;l.llpn~•·:'lt** , .. ,;,.

**~rr** r•!:;ulitllons to he str"nl!thl'nt!J "'

**.··:!"·i·:~~** !.>the 1nten:t uf the CTG's. F\Jr l"

.

**.J:'l';:;~•** suur::e-1 thil,t ha\·e pre\·1ously l.:l'•'!l exempt fro1m

**monuor~ng requ1re~!:!~ls**  due to line stze or the u•c of piu@ .tnd hall \'i.llves should become subti"Ct :o !h

.. SIP requirements. In add1t11Jn. SIP's shouid not exempt unsafe and •nac.cess1ble valves from till

**per~odic**Federal

**R~ster** 

### 1 Vol. 

## s::. No. 

## :=s I Tuesday. November ::4. 1987 

### I Notices 

### 45109
monatonn, requirements. The 

### EPA beiie\·es that anaccessable and unsafe-to· monitor valves should be monitored as often 11 practicable because of the potenual for findins leaks and reducing emassaons. The 

### EPA doea not consider annual monatorins or monatonng at shutdown to be an unreasonable burden for anaccessable and unsafe-to-monitor \·ah·es.

For naturalsas plants. RACT should apply to equapment that contatns or contac:s I procesa Stream Wllh a VQC concentration of 1.0 percent by wetght or more. Equtpment wuh procesa streams contaantnl relallvely low percentaaes of 

## vee (i.e

.. between 1.0 and 10.0 percent 

### I contnbutes a sagnaficant pon1on of total emasaions from natural gas plants and. therefore. is sub1ect to RACT requirements.



### E.temptlons and Variances: Manv SIP's contain proviSions giv1ng the State authonty to grant variances. e:otemplions. and altemalive means of control stratea1es. SIFs must clearly state whether 

### EPA approval of such vanances is required on a case-by-case baaii before such a variance. exemption. or altemallve meacs becomes federallyeffective. Provisrons that are intended to be genenc (i.e

.. not requiring caae-by· case EPA approval for the altemalive means to be federally-effective) must meet the general principle of replicability desc::ibed in EPA's Em1ssions Tradins Policy Statement (51 FR 43814. December 4. 19&eJ •. Appeodix E-Guidaac:al Doc:wneot oo Echuced 

### liM I. Introduction

The EPA has considered the potential for greater 

## vee and 

## co reductions from veiucle tnspection and maintenance programs. and believes that substa::uial er.hancement is available.

The 

### EPA is considenns a variety of opuons relative to enhanced 1/M. 1::cludina establishiniJ a specific e::nancea

**1/~** performance level fer some

**:~onat:aanrnent** areas as well as reiy1::11 on the J l)ercent reduction

**r!t;;oJrl!~e:~r** ro force consadernuon or r.::::unced

**l/~1an** lieu of a mnnd.ated

**;~·:c~anr.l!** reouaremenr. The Iauer r;;:::or: wou!t! ailow States to con!lider ::-1! LJeneiits cf

**enhat;~ced 1/~.**  along with :::::se of other control measures. in

**~t=c:~m~** how to meei the J percent '" l!tOIS:I! annual reduction requarement.

T!:e other option toward which EPA :s

**p~o;sl!nt!y** lenmtniJ would be to establish 11 specafic enhanced

**1/~** requirement for 01reas wath relatively serious ozone or CO nonattamment problems. The remilmder or thiS appendi)t descrtbes upects of and issues related to a separate enhanced 1/M requirement. if adopted.

Possible enhancements !all into four ciuesones. First.

**oper~ung** loues due to improper inspectaons. mcomplete enforcement. or len1ent repair waaver svstems can be reduced. Second. additional vehacles which are exempt based on age. or vehicle type can be made subject to the inspection requirement. Third. the emisaion test pOrtiOn of the periodic inspection can be made more sophisticated or the pass/ faillimtls or cutpoints more SU'in1Jent. Fourth. imponant emisa1on control components can be checked visually. or by other meana that do not involve enuss1ona measurement. for evidence of tampenns or misfuelins.

The concept of "enhanced 1/M." therefore. covers both increases to the coverase and stringency of inspection. and 1mproved manasement practices to asaure full effectivenesa. The requirements being considered for areas adopung enhanced 1/M are explained in detail below. 

### //. Bacicground

In 1971. EPA first established policy for the implementation o! the 1/M programa required under the Clean AJr Act Amendmenta of 1971. 

### Thia policy addressed the elements to be included in SIP revisiona, minimum emisaion reduction requirementa. adminiatntive requirementa. and schedules for implementation. Approvable 

### 1/M prosrama were to be in place in all ozone and CO extension areaa by the end of 1982. and were to produce at least a 25 percent reduction in light-duty vehicle hydrocarbon exhaust emisaiona and at least 3 percent reduction in CO exhaust emis11ons as of the end of 1987.

At this lime. there are 

### 1/M programs operating in 60 urban areas in 32 States. There are a variety of program designs in place. some wh1ch just exceed manimum levels. and some whach contnan additional measures to achie\·e greater emassion reducuons. The EPA audits of 1/M prosrams O\'er the !nst J yenrs have •dttnttfied both considerable acccmpl:$hments by State and loc:al asenc:es 1n ampiemenung programs suc:c:es:;f:Jlly. 11nd a number of

**operata~~~**

**;:~roblcms.** These audit finciin-:s sen:e as the biiS;s for the i:tcrensed

**st~:n;enc:y** and rhe additional

**adm~ntst~alive**

**r~q:.;art'me:tts** assoc:ated wi:h e!thanced I i :\I. 

### Ill. :;""" Fru 1 

### or.r.anca S::mdn:d 'or

**~** 

# ·oc a:1d CO 

### Reduc:1or.s ·

The Er.'\ has deu1o;led a computer model whic.'t it proposes to use to assess the benefits of vanous

**1/~** prosram desasns.

**e~pressed** as annual tons of **red~1ction** from a typaca! uroan fleet of one mallion vehacles. The model is based on MOBII.Ll. but performs adduaonal man1apulattons of the emtssaon esumates. The aasumpuons empioyed 1 n thiS computer model are exptaaned 1 n detaa! 1n

**til~e** techmcal report. entuled "Mernod for E:.stt:naung the Coat·E!fer:uveness of lnspect.on/Maantenance Program Desagns."

nae I.PA is leaning toward a nomana! perft)rmance standard to be ac.•ueved b

.. enh1anced 1/M of 5700 tons of HC and 1 69.1XIO tona of CO per year per m:!hon liaht·duty vehicles over the fint 

## s · 1 ears of OJieration of the enhanced

**;~ror.ar::.** This level represents the desa@n ;eve 1 

## c: the third moat stnngent of 111e ::; or so distinct 

### liM programs currentiy 1n operation. A.. discussed 1n the preami:lie or this policy. EPA IS aiso r:ons:denn, other performance levels whtc.'l couid be established. if a separate enhanced

**I!~** requirement is adopted. The !eve! of performance descnbed above wowc! be equbralent to the following deSign:

**-c.~ntralized** biennial inspections 

## -zo model years of passenger can and

!ish t trucka 

## -zo percent stringency for pre-1981

vehicles -Idle test -za.r{b) cutpoints for 1981- vehicles

(l.Z percent C0/220 ppm HCJ -c.-..talyst. inlet. and lead deposit

iJu:pections on 1981 + vehacles 

## -s

**~·ercent** waiver on the emuaum

**sht~i1** test

**Pro11~ams** which vary from this desiiZI yet have equivalent emassion reductions would be acceptable. For example. decentralized biennial inspectioDS 111d/ or fe•wer model years of r:overa1e 

# a" also allowed. provaded other features of the program de111n are

**stren~tllened** suc.'l that the estimated benefit 

### :neetS the new performance standard.

Prt1g:ams may show equ1vaienc:y to thts clesasn usang

**etthe~** nauonal or locol con.!:uons of tampennai mtsiueitng r:-.:es. '·ehtc!e type m:x.

**avera~e** speed. C!!C. t."se or !OC3f COftQI::OI:$

**~.tV ~es;:il**  ::: .1

**;:c~:o~:-::.1nr:e** standnrd

**d:irt!~P~t** :::Jn 5;'00/G9.000: tn all cases. equava,l!nc:y ::J t!-.e OJt.ove de:ug:l wouid !:le

**t~e**

**tc::t~cl!::l~ ~::te~tnn**  f<Jr <l;::'i)ro,·Jl.

**1"!':,~** new c:ompurer :node!

**~as** :wo t.:..ai!.:res wh:c!-: we:e nor :::r:!u.:!cd '"

**~ICSIU:J** but whar:h

**q~pw** 01:: .Ji the ;:;;<: J yeurs oi

**evai~ar:::g -o;:oe~alln'**  pro11r:rns. f':rst. f&Jr

**pur;:~oses** oi Si? itpj:rCI\"31. decentrala:ed pregr:Jr.":S w.;! be

**C~t!ti:ted** wt:h identafy1ng anu

**re~a.t~tn;** elttS!Ing t•mpenn, at a r::ue '"hach is less than t!'!at :notieled for c:enmahzed pro8fams. The anaual nnalysas suaests a reduced