alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 24, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00747
- CR
STEWART CARTER HURST , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 354 th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 32486CR



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record was due July 21, 2019

. When it was not filed, we notified court reporter Julie Vrooman by postcard dated July 24, 2019 and directed her to file (1) the report er’s record, (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded, or (3) written verification that appellant had not requested the reporter’s record by August 23, 2019. No response was filed. On September 10, 2019, we ordered the complete reporter’s r ecord filed by October 4,
2019. We caution ed Ms. Vrooman that the failure to file the reporter’s record by that date m ight result in the Court taking whatever remedies it has available to ensure that the appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, which m ight in clude ordering that she not sit until the complete reporter’s
record is filed. To date, no reporter’s record has been filed, and we have had no communication
from Ms. Vrooman.We ORDER that court reporter Julie C. Vroom NOT SIT as a court reporter until s he

has filed the complete reporter’s record in this appeal.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Keli Aiken , Presiding Judge, 354 th Judicial District Court; Julie Vrooman , official court reporter, 354 th Judicial District Court; to the Hunt County Auditor’s Office and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.2

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-139722) of Home Inns & Hotels Management Inc. of our report
dated April 16, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Home Inns & Hotels Management Inc. (the Company) and our report dated July 12, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Home Inns Hotel
Management (Beijing) Co., Ltd., which appear in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company

June 21, 2007
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.1






AMENDED AND RESTATED


SPRAGUE RESOURCES GP LLC


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 
Effective September 29, 2016




Unless otherwise determined by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Sprague Resources GP LLC (the “General Partner”), officers, employees or paid consultants and advisors of the General Partner or its affiliates (including Axel Johnson Inc. and its affiliates) who also serve as members of the Board will not receive additional compensation for their service as members of the Board. All members of the Board not included in the preceding sentence shall be referred to as the “non-employee directors”. Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $60,000, paid in quarterly installments. Each non-employee director will also receive an annual award, granted within five business days of October 15 of each year, of the number of fully vested common units representing limited partner interests (“Common Units”) in Sprague Resources LP (the “Partnership”) having a grant date fair value of approximately $60,000, subject to the terms and vesting schedules set forth in the applicable grant documents. Further, each non-employee director serving as a chairman or a member of a committee of the Board will receive an annual retainer of $10,000 or $5,000, respectively, paid in quarterly installments. Annual cash retainers and grants of Common Units will be pro-rated for directors who join the Board mid-year. All directors will receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses associated with attending meetings of the Board or committees of the Board. Each director will receive liability insurance coverage and be fully indemnified by the Partnership for actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 27
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 27
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
             RFMSI SERIES 2006-S11 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
November 1, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of November 1, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential  Funding Securities I, Inc., as company,  Residential  Funding
Company,  LLC,  as master  servicer,  and U.S.  Bank  National  Association,  as
trustee,  does hereby  certify  that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.


2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### Rafael GUITRON-BARAJAS, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-73190

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*629Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

Maria Elena Andrade, I, Attorney, An-drade Legal, Boise, ID, for Petitioner

Mona Maria Yousif, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Guitron-Barajas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings and to reissue its previous decision dismissing his appeal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and a motion to reissue. Her*nandez-Velasquez v. Holder,*611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2010). We review de novo constitutional claims. *Id.*We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Guitron-Barajas’ motion to reopen based on alleged ineffective assistance before the agency for failure to establish prejudice. *See Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 899-900 (9th Cir. 2003) (to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a petitioner must show prejudice).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to reissue its May 31, 2013, order, where Guitron-Barajas does not dispute that he had an opportunity to file a timely petition for review before this court. *See Singh v. Napolitano,*649 F.3d 899, 901 (9th Cir. 2011) (the BIA has reissued decisions where an alien has shown lack of notice due to administrative error or ineffective assistance of counsel). Contrary to Guitron-Barajas’ contention, the BIA also did not abuse its discretion in declining to consider his counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance before this court. *See In re Compean (Compean II),*25 I. & N. Dec. 1, 3 (A.G. 2009).

Contrary to Guitron-Barajas’ contentions, the BIA sufficiently articulated its reasoning, did not ignore contentions, and applied the proper legal standard. *See Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, the BIA did not violate due process in denying the motion. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien must demonstrate error and prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Guitron-Barajas’ remaining contentions regarding diligence and attorney error before the agency.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Filed April 16, 1891.

#### Nathan Bohm *et al.,*Resp’ts, *v.*The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co. *et al.,*App’lts.

Appeal by defendants from judgment entered upon findings and conclusions made at special term.

*Julien T. Davies*and *Osgood Smith,*for app’lts; *Charles Gibson Bennett,*for resp’ts.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Councilmember Coates introduced the following Resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2015-26 WHEREAS, The City of Chadron ownsand operatesthe Chadron Municipal Airport which provides commercial air service; and WHEREAS, The Department
of Transportation
has solicited proposals from carriers
to provide Essential Air Service to Chadron, Nebraska; and WHEREAS, Our currentcarrier's contract
to provide Essential Air Service ends May 31, 2015;and WHEREAS, Fourcarriers submitted proposals which wereevaluated and rated by members of the Airport Advisory Committee and key staff; and WHEREAS, Based onthe evaluations and interviews with
the four carriers, the groupis recommending
the selection of Boutique Air, contingent upon receiving approval with the Transportation Security Administration
for sterile operations,

tothe Department
of Transportation

to provide Essential Air Service for Chadron. NOW THEREFORE BEIT RESOLVED BYTHE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF CHADRON, NEBRASKA: That Boutique Air, contingent upon receiving approval with the Transportation Security Administration
for sterile operations,
berecommended

tothe Department
of Transportation

to provide Essential Air Service tothe Chadron Municipal Airport. The foregoing Resolution having been read, MayorFisher seconded the motion for its passageand adoption, and after consideration thereof, the roll wascalled onthe passageand adoption of said Resolution and the following Councilmembers voted Aye: Fisher, Werner, Coates, Bannan, Gamby. The following voted Nay

:None.The passageof the Resolution having been consented
to by morethan
a majority of the members elected tothe Council was declared passed and adopted this 2nd day of March, 2015. CITY OF CHADRON **~** MayorATIEST: **~~** (SEAL)
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Reidco Acquisition I Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Reid H.
Drescher, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Reid H. DrescherReid
      H. Drescher
              Principal
      Executive Officer
              Principal
      Financial Officer
              January
      28, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

         We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
October 8, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Net2Phone, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended July 31, 2004, in each of following:

         Registration Statement No. 333-101734 on Form S-8;
         Registration Statement No. 333-83670 on Form S-8
         Registration Statement No. 333-51248 on Form S-8;
         Registration Statement No. 333-74354 on Form S-8;
         Registration Statement No. 333-85945 on Form S-8;
         Registration Statement No. 333-56844 (Amendment #1) on Form S-3/A;
         Registration Statement No. 333-78713 (Amendment #1) on Form S-3/A;
         Registration Statement No. 333-110118 (Amendment #2) on Form S-3/A; and
         Registration Statement No. 333-111403 on Form S-8.





New York, New York
October 8, 2004
#### Laryssa JOCK, Jacquelyn Boyle, Christy Chadwick, Lisa Follett, Maria House, Denise Maddox, Lisa McConnell, Gloria Pagan, Judy Reed, Linda Rhodes, Khristina Rodriguez, Nina Shahmirzadi, Leighla Smith, Marie Wolf, Kelly Contreras, Dawn Souto-Coons, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. STERLING JEWELERS INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.

16-1731-cv

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 1, 2017

Appearing for Appellant: Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Seyfarth Shaw LLP (David Bennet Ross, Lorie E. Almon, Daniel B. Klein, on the brief), New York, NY., Jeffrey S. Klein, Weil, Gotshal *&*Manges LLP, New York, NY.

Appearing for Appellees: Joseph M. Sellers, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC (Kalpana Kotagal, Shaylyn Cochran, on the brief), Washington, DC., Sam J. Smith, Loren B. Donnell, Burr *&*Smith LLP, St. Petersburg, FL., Thomas A. Warren, Tallahassee, FL.

Present: JON 0. NEWMAN, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant Sterling Jewelers Inc. (“Sterling”) appeals the May 22, 2016 opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, *J.)*holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Sterling’s motion to vacate the arbitrator’s Equal Pay Act Collective Action Conditional Certification Award and the arbitrator’s Order Re Claimants’ Motion for Tolling of EPA Limitations Period. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history, and specification of issues for review.

“Every federal appellate court has a special obligation to satisfy itself not only of its own jurisdiction, but also that of the lower courts in a cause under review, even [if] the parties are prepared to concede it.” *Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft v. U.S. Oil Trading LLC,*814 F.3d 146, 150 n.10 (2d Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act provides that an appeal may be taken only in limited circumstances, including from “an order” “confirming or denying confirmation of an award or partial award.” 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(D). The district court’s order *666from which Sterling appeals neither confirmed nor denied confirmation of an award or partial award, but instead held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider an interim decision of the arbitrator. *See Accenture LLP v. Spreng,*647 F.3d 72, 77 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining Section 16(a)(1)(D) confers jurisdiction only-over appeals of arbitration awards that “finally and definitively dispose of a separate independent claim”).

Accordingly, the instant appeal hereby is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jane Lanning, Respondent, against Erie Railroad Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued October 7, 1943;

decided November 18, 1943.

*689
      *William G. Conable*for appellant.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*and *Orrin G. Judd*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippet, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The
undersigned, the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.



/s/    JEFFREY E.
HARTMANNJeffrey E. HartmannExecutive Vice President, Finance andChief Financial OfficerAugust 16, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON



### O RDER

Appellate case name: Terrence Tompkins v. State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 12

- 00592

- CR

Trial court case number: 1337275

Trial court: 232nd District Court of Harris Cou nty

Appellant Tompkins has filed a motion to supplement the clerk’s record with a bill of costs. The motion to supplement the clerk’s record is granted . Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c) and 44.3, the trial court clerk is ordered to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental record containing a bill of costs. If no bill of costs currently exists, the trial court clerk or an officer of the court is ordered to prepare a bill of costs for inclusion in the supplemental record. See T EX

. C OD E C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 103.006 (West 2001) (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send

the bill of costs to the court to which the acti on . . . is . . . appealed.”); see also Cardenas

v. State , No. 01

- 11

- 01123

- CR, 2013 WL 1164365, at *4−5 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 21, 2013, no pet. h.) (op. on reh’g).

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appea ls no later than May 3 , 2013

.

At the same time he filed his motion to supplement the record, appellant Tompkins also filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. The motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted . Altho ugh Tompkins only requested until May 5, 2013 to file his appellant’s brief, the supplemental clerk’s record ordered above is not due until May 3 , 2013. Accordingly, we order Tompkins’s appellant’s brief to be filed no later than 15 days after the date the supplemental

clerk’s record is filed . No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary

circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown______

Acting individually

Date: April 23, 201 3
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gensym Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Stephen D. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2006 |  | /s/ STEPHEN D. ALLISON                    
|                    |  | Stephen D. Allison Chief Financial
Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6895 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 

to extend Federal support for bioindustrial manufacturing processes to 

include support for the manufacturing of certain pharmaceutical ingredients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2023 

Ms. SLOTKIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2023 to extend Federal support for bioindustrial 

manufacturing processes to include support for the manufacturing of certain pharmaceutical ingredients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Production 

5 and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6895 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF SUPPORT FOR RESEARCH AND 

2 DEVELOPMENT OF BIOINDUSTRIAL MANU3 FACTURING PROCESSES. 

4 Section 215(c)(1) of the James M. Inhofe National 

5 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Public 

6 Law 117–263; 10 U.S.C. 4841 note) is amended by insert7 ing ‘‘active pharmaceutical ingredients, key starting mate8 rials for such ingredients,’’ after ‘‘commodity chemicals,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB