Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 165
          - [Docket Number USCG-2022-0127]
          - RIN 1625-AA87

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

Temporary final rule.

# SUMMARY:

The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary security zones for certain navigable waters of the Anacostia River and Susquehanna River. The security zones are needed to safeguard persons, including those under the protection of the United States Capitol Police (USCP), and property from terrorist acts and incidents and to prevent terrorist acts or incidents while travelling across navigable waters between Washington, DC, and Philadelphia, PA. These security zones will be enforced only for the protection of those persons when in the area and will restrict vessel traffic while the zones are being enforced. Entry of vessels or persons into these zones is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative.

# DATES:

This rule is effective from 11 a.m. on March 9, 2022, until 11 p.m. on March 11, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to                         *https://www.regulations.gov,*                         type USCG-2022-0127 in the “SEARCH” box and click “SEARCH.” Next, in the Document Type column, select “Supporting & Related Material.”                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Sector Maryland-NCR, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard: telephone 410-576-2674, email                         *Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COTP Captain of the Port

DHS Department of Homeland Security

FR Federal Register

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code
      ( print page 11306)    

## II. Background Information and Regulatory History

Persons under the protection of the USCP will be travelling to and from a nationally-publicized event in Philadelphia, PA, on March 9, 2022, and March 11, 2022, respectively. The highways to be travelled are located across navigable waters within the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region's Area of Responsibility, as set forth at 33 CFR 3.25-15.

The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.” Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to public interest to delay the effective date of this rule. Immediate action is needed to protect persons under the protection of the USCP, mitigate potential terrorist acts, and enhance public and maritime safety and security. The Coast Guard was unable to publish a NPRM due to the short time period between event planners notifying the Coast Guard of the event and publication of these security zones. Furthermore, delaying the effective date would be contrary to the security zones' intended objectives of protecting persons under the protection of the USCP, mitigating potential terrorist acts and enhancing public and maritime safety and security. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish the security zones by March 9, 2022.

                    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable because immediate action to restrict vessel traffic is needed to protect life, property and the environment, therefore a 30-day notice period is impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the security zones' intended objectives of protecting persons under the protection of the USCP, mitigating potential terrorist acts and enhancing public and maritime safety and security.                

## III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that the presence of persons under the protection of the USCP at these locations presents a potential target for terrorist attack, sabotage, or other subversive acts, accidents, or other causes of similar nature. This rule is needed to protect persons under the protection of the USCP, personnel in and around these locations, navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities.

## IV. Discussion of the Rule

This rule establishes two security zones for certain navigable waters within the COTP Maryland-National Capital Region Zone, as described in 33 CFR 3.25-15, and will be enforced during the times described below for each zone.

The first security zone will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 9, 2022, and from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 11, 2022. The security zone will cover all navigable waters of the Anacostia River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points, beginning at the shoreline down river from the Southeast Freeway (I-695) Bridge at 38°52′18″ N, 076°59′42″ W, thence southeast across the river to the shoreline at 38°52′06″ N, 076°59′36″ W, thence north and east along the shoreline to 38°52′24″ N, 076°59′02″ W, thence northwest across the river to the shoreline at 38°52′31″ N, 076°59′08″ W, thence west and south along the shoreline back to the beginning point, located at Washington, DC The duration of the zone is intended to protect persons under the protection of the USCP, personnel in and around these locations, navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities.

The second security zone will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 9, 2022, and from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 11, 2022. The security zone will cover all navigable waters of the Susquehanna River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points, beginning at the shoreline down river from the Millard E. Tydings Memorial (I-95) Bridge at 39°34′31″ N, 076°06′25″ W, thence northeast across the river to the shoreline at 39°34′55″ N, 076°05′36″ W, thence northwest along the shoreline to 39°35′15″ N, 076°06′04″ W, thence southwest across the river to the shoreline at 39°34′55″ N, 076°06′50″ W, thence southeast along the shoreline back to the beginning point, located between Cecil and Harford Counties, MD. The duration of the zone is intended to protect persons under the protection of the USCP, personnel in and around these locations, navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities.

No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zones without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

## V. Regulatory Analyses

We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

### A. Regulatory Planning and Review

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a “significant regulatory action,” under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

This regulatory action determination is based on the sizes, locations, and limited durations of the security zones. The first zone impacts a small designated area of the Anacostia River for 24 total enforcement hours. This portion of the waterway supports tug and barge traffic year round and recreational vessel traffic, which at its peak, occurs mainly during the summer season. The second zone impacts a small designated area of the Susquehanna River for 24 total enforcement hours. This portion of the waterway supports recreational vessel traffic, which at its peak, occurs mainly during the summer season. Although these security zones extend across the entire widths of the respective waterways, these security zones will be enforced only for the protection of those persons when in the area and will restrict vessel traffic while the zones are being enforced. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the status of the security zones.

### B. Impact on Small Entities

                    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their                           ( print page 11307)                        fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.                

While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.

                    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section.                

Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

### C. Collection of Information

This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

### D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.

Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

### E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

### F. Environment

                    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves two temporary security zones lasting only 24 total enforcement hours that will prohibit entry within certain navigable waters of the Anacostia River and Susquehanna River. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the                     **ADDRESSES**                     section of this preamble.                

### G. Protest Activities

                    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.                

# List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

      - Harbors
      - Marine safety
      - Navigation (water)
      - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
      - Security measures
      - Waterways

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

# PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

2. Add § 165.T05-0127 to read as follows: 

§ 165.T05-0127 

                            (a)                             *Locations.*                             The following areas are a security zone. These coordinates are based on WGS 84.                        

                            (1)                             *Security Zone 1.*                             All navigable waters of the Anacostia River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points, beginning at the shoreline down river from the Southeast Freeway (I-695) Bridge at 38°52′18″ N, 076°59′42″ W, thence southeast across the river to the shoreline at 38°52′06″ N, 076°59′36″ W, thence north and east along the shoreline to 38°52′24″ N, 076°59′02″ W, thence northwest across the river to the shoreline at 38°52′31″ N, 076°59′08″ W, thence west and south along the shoreline back to the beginning point, located at Washington, DC.                        

                            (2)                             *Security Zone 2.*                             All navigable waters of the Susquehanna River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points, beginning at the shoreline down river from the Millard E. Tydings Memorial (I-95) Bridge at 39°34′31″ N, 076°06′25″ W, thence northeast across the river to the shoreline at 39°34′55″ N, 076°05′36″ W, thence northwest along the shoreline to 39°35′15″ N, 076°06′04″ W, thence southwest across the river to the shoreline at 39°34′55″ N, 076°06′50″ W, thence southeast along the shoreline back to the beginning point, located between Cecil and Harford Counties, MD.                        

                            (b)                             *Definitions.*                             As used in this section—                        

*Captain of the Port (COTP)*                             means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.                        

*Designated representative*                             means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital                                   ( print page 11308)                                Region (COTP) in the enforcement of the security zone.                        

                            (c)                             *Regulations.*                             (1) Under the general security zone regulations in subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.                        

(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.

                            (d)                             *Enforcement periods.*                             This section will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 9, 2022, and from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. on March 11, 2022.                        

Dated: February 24, 2022.

David E. O'Connell,

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.

[FR Doc. 2022-04304 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P