SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V) 

 SIP Submitted by: Maryland Department of the Environment  Date Submitted: April 22, 2009  Subject: Adoption of EPA CTG for Flexible Packaging Printing Amendments to Regulation .10 and new 

26.11.19 

 Completeness Review  Completed by: Irene Shandruk /s/  Date Completed: May 25, 2010 Administrative Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 

1. Letter dated April 22, 2009 from Shari T. WilMaryland Department of the Environment to ShaRegional Administrator. 

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 

2. The State has submitted evidence that the reguadopted and approved in final form on March 21

effective date of April 19, 2010. 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 

3. The regulations were issued pursuant to MarylEnvironment Article, §§1-101, 1-404, 2-101 – 2-303, 10-102, and 10-103, Annotated Code of MaActs of 2006. 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 

4. A copy of the proposed rule was published in Register on December 18, 2009, and the final rulin the Maryland Register on April 9, 2010 with aof April 19, 2010. 

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 

5. Cover letter transmitting the SIP revision date

2009. Copies and certification of public hearing 

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 

6. Notice of public hearing and public comment 

published in The Washington Post and MDE’s w

December 17, 2009 and in The Baltimore Sun an

Frederick News-Post on December 18, 2009, and 

notices were provided. Notice of public hearing 

published in Saint Mary’s Enterprise, Cumberlan

and in the Salisbury Daily Times on December 1

hearing transcript is provided. 

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 

7. Original Transcript of Public Hearing was proApril 22, 2009 submittal. 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. One public comment was given and provided 

22, 2009 submittal. 
Technical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal identifies VOCs, which are pre

hour ozone. 

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 

2. State of Maryland. 

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from theaffected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 

3. Not applicable. The plan established requiremvolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from flexibprinting. 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 

4. The SIP revision consists of an amendment to .10 and a new regulation, .10-1. This CTG will emissions of VOCs from flexible package printiaid in the (1) attainment of the 8-hour ozone stanimprovement of the ambient air quality in Maryl

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 

5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration support the required revision. No additional moUAM attainment modeling is needed. 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 

6. The plan established requirements to limit VOflexible package printing. 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practicestandards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 

7. The plan established requirements to limit VOflexible package printing, and contains work praand recordkeeping/reporting requirements. 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 

8. The plan established requirements to limit VOflexible package printing. 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.)

9. No special justifications are required. 

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 

10. Not applicable because this is not a section