# e 7 ; _ '~ 'T/-- °- 

# I-, Clo+L4s( Aa<^he 4<& 

# ^ ^e^slu, C 

# e^Nr>/ /#ir CvAd 0 

### ior^ -t h /f fi^^ 1E-217 

### J 

## k';~~AA\K,, , ,:.::o .7- . : 

## ho 9 -7 -- 

### S

T a


## E)L, I( a'^ .2 .. .. L



### _ 

## R- 

## 0q O3 V6/G- / <>Xv, 3./ / KV ^^Ys.z it/?--^^
_ v zJ /7 7 7 6-2n
_ ___. 

# 1e, _#I,_ j^u 

# _ __A 

# j ZfUL_

- 

## 32f ___3



# - G)/V) 

### a5 ---- 2aZ -3 -2 / 

### -(

-CL . rjtlJCj r/



### __, 

## ¢ (,v -- - -Zi (A 

### - 

### /V1A~z~l JfWU-L 

# ACL (z)IL-9,3 

# J7 ) §<< /b (

54 vsk4-I C 4 

## UT ^**~1·,**

I 

# c I**o+~ ~S** **0voJ]tJ~~** 41\1&

## 12..~~{J.i!'v-f/~ f G.QAijre>. ( !1-i.,-**COlVdr'i-'70rJl'~ 111.c.~+/-u')**  

### DR. c. 

# -z**/f~y** RoOM.. 1£-Uo 

### 7 -

## ~ 

# .**_JhO~e..nD.** 

## j) 

# 6' L 6.' I - 

### (2)j)S'rfo 

# 7!- J L . -.. -- " I .)0 -II. $

### ~2)2J**»~** 

# -**~q5?** 

### _______. ____.. _ 

# /JtJc.- .**dto/Jg&-l~** 

# ___------**Jt~/)L** . _ _ 4/J /] 77-

### o~ 2fL _____ 

# ---Ac£fE- ______________**?-O~~21-- ~~---,-=73_** **D~ olfc~._~J-** **~v~** 

### 5a3**31~-1.;?_~** 

### _______ . 

### )j-5t=-

## ;Zo~ 

# s- 30
-- 

## 2_?::LY_ 

# !5 VJ

# V. rt 

## l5,J(.]I«---> 

# (PC; <liZ) q '2.-3, 2"-()-

## _Q~~~__ _ . 

# rG'y**~ Lfi~** **~** 973 

# --QffJO V t 

## i!/)6. . .

## ~d-**ScfC~t1.(.;;_(**.. _. 

# !Dtq({

# e (ZIOZ.)

## 5?~"**916~ ~**  ______ _ 

## rXJ'l/ t"'"i :It:YL 

## s?? \, nStjL_ 

## It0 

### L 

### .C'ZtJz.) _

## 80 3 :**~~31** 

# ______. __ .... Do(**(UoZ)5~b** 

### -o'}7( 

# fi/**uJf/~C-** 

### CiD3)**~'22 -5"~**  __

### ~ 

# L 

# De 6' vlt 

## ;10 ({}lJ7t 

## AOL (2()1.-) gc,**~** 

### - 

### 5**~9~_**



### -0-0-1; (

## ~e.. ;J. 0 J - 

## 5""8**~** 

## - 7.1 ;I 

### 8 

# ·DD E..- 

# 'SbJ-**.s~** 

### Q0.l \ .. 

# f)6f**~6 Ajfb~£7_7t:** 

.. L I};VL. ---- 

## '-1#G

- -.**L.l/jv~** 

### !-Ijj.}/....;

### R 

### ; ^ -r/5y-v!TD^ -7 

## iL'-y Proposed Agenda Meeting Objectives: * To clarify, amend and prioritize the list of issues informally raised by the advocates * To provide, prior to the Public Workshop, the opportunity to present the Reverse Engineering Analysis methodology. * To review the assumptions that go into the Engineering, LCC and NES models and to determine whether the assumptions are reasonable.
1. Introduction 2. Perceived Issues 3. Reverse Engineering Discussion and Spreadsheet Demo 4. Engineering Analysis Assumptions and Issues 5. LCC/NES Assumptions and Issues 6. Closure



## 24 Proposed Agenda Meeting Objectives: • To clarify, amend and prioritize the list of issues informally raised by the advocates • To provide, prior to the Public Workshop, the opportunity to present the Reverse Engineering Analysis methodology. • To review the assumptions that go into the Engineering, LCC and NES models and to determine whether the assumptions are reasonable.
1. Introduction 2. Perceived Issues 3. Reverse Engineering Discussion and Spreadsheet Demo 4. Engineering Analysis Assumptions and Issues 5. LCCINES Assumptions and Issues 6. ClosureIssue ID Description Source EA-1 Impact of emerging technologies on manufacturing cost: microchannel ACEEE, hear exchangers NRDC EA-2 EER vs. SEER NRDC EA-3 Fixed expansion devices VEIC LCC-1 Equipment life function: cold region operation ACEEE LCC-2 RECS 97 data ACEEE LCC-3 Time of Use Electricity Rates ACEEE LCC-4 Blended standard based on commercial usage of residential equipment ACEEE



### Q :\EE-431 \CAC\StandRul\ANOPR\ 12-9-99_wdrkshop\advocate_issues.wpd4

Issue ID Description Source EA-l Impact of emerging technologies on manufacturing cost: microchannel ACEEE, hear exchangers NRDC EA-2 EER vs. SEER NRDC EA-3 Fixed expansion devices VEIC LCC-l Equipment life function: cold region operation ACEEE LCC-2 RECS 97 data ACEEE LCC-3 Time of Use Electricity Rates ACEEE LCC-4 Blended standard based on commercial usage of residential equipment ACEEE

Q:\EE-431 \CAC\StandRul\ANOPR\12-9-99 _w6rkshop\advocate jssues.wpd4N 

### %'-A 

## -R 

# 1sr%-^ li WM.
CandidateStandard Levels
* Candidate standard levels:

- SEER 11

- SEER 12

- SEER 13 * Maximum Technologically Feasible (approximately SEER 20 level)



### *The Process Rule requires the Department to specify in the ANOPR candidate standards levels, but not to propose a particular standard. *The Department intends to further consider and conduct analyses for candidate standards levels in the SEER 11, 12 and 13 efficiency range.

· The Department intends to also conduct analyses for equipment considered to be in the maximum technologically feasible efficiency range of approximately SEER 20. *The Department is interested in receiving comments on alternative scenarios that would provide energy savings to the Nation comparable to the savings that would be obtained by the highest standards that are technologically feasible and economically justified effective in 2006. Alternative scenarios might include different efficiency levels combined with different effective dates.


# LV6K Candidate Standard Levels

• Candidate standard levels:

- SEER 11

- SEER 12

- SEER 13 • Maximum Technologically Feasible (approximately SEER 20 level)

-The Process Rule requires the Department to specify in the ANOPR candidate standards levels, but not to propose a particular standard. -The Department intends to further consider and conduct analyses for candidate standards levels in the SEER 11, 12 and

. 13 efficiency range.

-The Department intends to also conduct analyses for equipment considered to be in the maximum technologically feasible efficiency range of approximately SEER 20. -The Department is interested in receiving comments on alternative scenarios that would provide energy savings to the Nation comparable to the savings that would be obtained by the highest standards that are technologically feasible and economically justified effective in 2006. Alternative scenarios might include different efficiency levels combined with different effective dates.E ngin ee ri ng Ana l y i s Revers e Engineerin g Pr oducti on Cost Results 

### T he result ar deta il e d productio n cost es timates for each e quipm e nt sampl e , aggregated across eight effi c i en cy l ev e l s and four product classes. Reve rse E ngine e ring Re u l t s (7/11/9 9) -- Unitary 3-ton $1 , 300 $1,200 Split Air Conditioner : $1 , 100 

### --+- -- Case d coil


# - $1 , 000 en 

### --+- -- Fancoil 0 0 $900 c: Split Heat Pump

.2 $800 

# - 0 ::::J $700 "0 0 

### .... --- Packaged Air Cond iti one r 

### ----*- Packaged Heat Pump a. $600 $ 500 $400 $300 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Efficiency Leve l (SEER) 

### Cost result s by s ubassembly are available in the TSD and on the BTS websit e. WAS CAC EngAna lysis ANOPR wkshp