alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0019 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-045-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 1O-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pam Schertz, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Pam Schertz

Pam Schertz

Controller



November 20, 2006
#### people *v.*McCracken. APPEAL OF UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY.

1. Bail — -Recognizance Bond — Breach—Imprisonment of Principal.

Imprisonment of the prineipal on a criminal recognizance bond in another jurisdiction does not exeuse the surety from production of the prineipal, because the surety, as jailer away from jail, is bound at its peril to keep the accused within the jurisdiction in which the recognizance is given.

2. Same — Recognizance Bond — Breach—Imprisonment of Principal.

Surety on a recognizance bond to assure the appearance of the prineipal in a court in Michigan held, liable on the bond when the prineipal fails to appear because he is imprisoned by Eederal authorities in Indiana.

References for Points in Headnotes

[1,2] 8 Am Jur 2d, Bail and Recognizance §§ 187-189.

Appeal from Kalamazoo, Fox (Raymond W.), J.

Submitted Division 3 April 2, 1968, at Grand Rapids.

(Docket Nos. 1,375, 1,376, and 1,377.)

Decided May 29, 1968.

*554Petition by the people against United Bonding-Insurance Company, an Indiana corporation, for the amount of 3 recognizance bonds posted for Walter L. McCracken, upon failure of McCracken to appear in court for trial. Bonds forfeited and judgment entered against surety. Surety appeals.

Affirmed.

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Derengoski,*Solicitor General, *Donald A. Burge,*Prosecuting Attorney and *J ames L. Shonkwiler, J r.,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

*Joseph J. Jerkins,*for surety.

Burns, P. J.

The United Bonding Insurance Company appeals from judgments which were entered upon the forfeiture of 3 recognizance bonds. The question common to each of these consolidated cases is:

“Should a forfeiture of the bond and a subsequent judgment be entered against the surety when the principal is unable to appear because of incarceration by the Federal authorities (in Indiana) and the surety has offered to produce the principal upon his release by the Federal authorities or in the alternative, deposit a sum of money with the court to guarantee the cost of returning the principal upon his release by the Federal authorities?”

The Michigan Supreme Court has stated by way of dictum that the impossibility of the principal appearing at a specified time because of arrest and detention *in Michigan*would discharge the surety from liability. *People*v. *Robb*(1894), 98 Mich 397, 400. But the Court has not addressed itself to the problem of incarceration outside of Michigan. The majority rule is clear that such imprisonment *555will not excuse the production of the principal. See *State*v. *Mitchell*(1965), — Del — (212 A2d 873), and relevant cases cited therein on p 885.' ,.

United Bonding Insurance Company, as jailer away from jail, was bound at its peril to keep the accused within this jurisdiction.

Judgments, affirmed. '

Quinn and Ziem, JJ., conpurred.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof American Wagering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Icertify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

A signed original of this written statement, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date:  December 15,  2009 |   | /s/  Victor J. Salerno                               |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Victor  J. Salerno                                   |
|                                     |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating |
|                                     |   | Officer,  and Chairman of the Board of Directors     |
|                                     |   |                                                 |
|                                     |   |                                                 |
|                                     |   | /s/  Melody J. Sullivan                              |
|                                     |   | Melody  J. Sullivan                                  |
|                                     |   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer               |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dartaniel HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-31156 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Dartaniel Harris, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dartaniel Harris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harris has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.
#### Dulla SINGH, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70213

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 23, 2017 *

Filed October 30, 2017

Dulla Singh, Pro Se

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Brooke Maurer, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges,

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision, without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dulla Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. *Najmabadi v.*Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reopen where it was untimely and number-barred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where Singh failed to establish materially changed circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limitations for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3); *Najmabadi,*597 F.3d at 991-92 (BIA did not abuse its discretion where petitioner failed to introduce material evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Thomas M. Dougherty, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AirGate PCS, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: December 14, 2004 /s/ Thomas M. DoughertyThomas M. DoughertyChief Executive Officer
#### William B. Sachs, Appellant, *v.*Cluett Peabody & Co., Inc., Respondent.

Argued November 15, 1943;

decided January 6, 1944.

*773
      *Elkon Turk, George Gaskill*and *Herman Goldman*for appellant.

*William Piel, Jr., Edward H. Green*and *Roy L. Steinheimer, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the   accompanying   Quarterly  Report  of  Concierge
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December
31,  2006 (the  "Report"),  I, Allen E.  Kahn,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 13, 2007
                                                        /s/ Allen E. Kahn
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Allen E. Kahn
                                                        Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.











                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Evan Williams, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Border Management,
Inc;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the Small Business Issuer ("registrant") as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

A)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
Such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

B)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(a)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2007

/s/ Evan Williams
-------------------------------
Evan Williams
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
 WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 (Effective March 26, 2012) 
 The annual retainer for all non-employee directors is $40,000. Annual retainers for committee chairpersons are as follows: Chairman of the Board (if non-employee) -$20,000; Chair of the Audit
Committee—$10,000; and Chair of the Compensation Committee—$10,000. Annual retainers for the members of committees are as follows: Member of the Audit Committee—$5,000; and Member of the Compensation Committee—$5,000. There is
not separate compensation for meeting attendance. In addition, all directors may be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive
additional compensation for service as directors. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. On a director’s initial appointment date, non-employee directors are each granted 20,000
restricted shares, with 25% vesting on each annual anniversary date of the grant. On April 1 of each year, another 10,000 restricted shares shall be granted to each non-employee director with 25% vesting on each annual anniversary of their
respective grant dates.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger Etess
Chief Executive Officer,
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
August 13, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the
Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.14 VIA EDGAR  TO: United States Securities and Exchange Commission  Re: Asanko Gold Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 40-F Consent of Expert This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report), as filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Companys Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Information Form). I, John Stansbury, DO HEREBY CONSENT, to:  · the use of my name and the disclosure of my involvement in the preparation of information that forms the basis for disclosure of a technical and scientific nature related to the Companys Asanko Gold Mine Project, contained in the Annual Information Form, and  · the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such information in the Annual Report.  Dated March 16, 2015   // David MorganDavid Morgan
M.Sc. Eng (Civil), CP Eng
Managing Director
DRA Mineral Projects (Pty) Ltd.
Exhibit 99.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Toys “R” Us, Inc. (the “**Company**”) for the period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”), I, Louis Lipschitz,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Louis Lipschitz_______ |
|----------------------------|
| Name:            | Louis Lipschitz |
| Title:                     | Executive Vice President |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:            | June 16, 2003 |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Toys “R” Us, Inc. and will be retained by Toys “R” Us, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.