alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). SZ/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OSE S ER AFI N RAM I RE Z- DE LA CR UZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 30147 D. C. No . 3 : 0 7 - CR - 0 0 4 4 8 - ALH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon A nc e rL . H a gge rty , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose S er af

i n R am i re z- D e L a C ruz app ea l s f rom the 57 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for i l l egal re entry , i n v i ol at i on of 

# FI LED JAN 04 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSS Z/ Res ea r ch 09- 30147 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f i rm, b u t r e m a n dto c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t. R a m i r e z - D e L aC ruz c ont e nds tha thi s s e nt e nc e i s unr e a s onabl e be c aus e : ( 1) i ti s bas ed on a 16-l evel enhancem ent , pu rs uantt o U . S . S . G . § 2 L 1. 2(b)(1)(A ), w hi ch i s an i nh er ent l y f l aw ed G ui del i ne; (2) app l i ca t i on of the 16 -l evel e n h a n c e m e n t r e s u lte din aG u id e lin e s ’ r a n g e th a t w a s g r e a te rth a n n e c e s s a ryto a c hi e ve the purpos e s of s e nt e nc i ng; ( 3) the di s tr i c tc ourtf a i l e d t o c ons i de rthe 18 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c to r s ; a n d( 4 ) th e d is tr ic t c o u rt f a ile dto c o n s id e rh is ar gu m entre gardi ng the 16 -l evel i ncre as e and hi s argum enti n favor of a departure ba s e d on a s s i m i l a t i on. T he r e c or d i ndi c a t e s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtdi d not p r o c e d u r a llye rra n dth a t R a m ir e z - D e L aC ru z ’s s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly r e a s o n ab le . Se e U

n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 2-93 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en b a n c ) ; cf . U ni ted States v. A m ez cua-V asqu ez , 56 7 F . 3d 10 50 , 10 54 -58 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). I n a c c or da nc e w i th U ni ted States v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m a n dth e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e in c o rr e c t r e f e r e n c e to § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) . See U ni ted States v. H erre ra-B lan co , 2 3 2 F .3 d7 1 5 , 7 1 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ( r e m a n d in g s u as p o n te to del et e the re fe re nce t o § 13 26 (b)) .S Z/ Res ea r ch 09- 30147 3 A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ctth e j u d gm en t.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Authority.



/s/    WILLIAM J.
VELARDOWilliam J. Velardo Chief Executive Officer Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority May 19, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6677 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6677

   To amend the National Levee Safety Act of 2007 to include in the 
definition of levee hard or manmade structures, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2023

Mr. Lynch (for himself and Mr. Moulton) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Levee Safety Act of 2007 to include in the 
definition of levee hard or manmade structures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seawall Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF LEVEE.

    Section 9002(7) of the National Levee Safety Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
3301) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``manmade barrier'' and inserting 
                ``hard or manmade structure or barrier'';
                    (B) by inserting ``, seawall, revetment, bulkhead, 
                groin, jetty, breakwater, dike, levee'' after 
                ``floodwall''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``or soft infrastructure 
                (including a beach, dune, or coastal bank)'' after 
                ``other structure)''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)--
                    (A) in clause (iii), by inserting ``or'' after the 
                semicolon;
                    (B) in clause (iv)(V), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a period; and
                    (C) by striking clause (v).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2

 

HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $35,000, plus a fee of $750 for each meeting attended. Up to two $750 fees are payable if a board meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.

 

·                  The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an Independent Trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $10,000, $5,000 and $5,000, respectively.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 2,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred from their attending certain continuing education programs.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 20-F of our report dated January 30, 2002, included in
the Company's 2001 Annual Report previously filed on Form 6-K (as amended),
and to the incorporation by reference of our report included in this Form
20-F into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8,
File No. 33-28473, Form S-8, File No. 333-6958, Form S-8, File No. 333-11178,
Form F-3, File No. 33-51798, Form F-3, File No. 33-96994, and Form F-3, File
No. 333-6960. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of the Company subsequent to November 30, 2001 or performed any
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                          /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

New York, New York
May 27, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2013

No. 04-13-00467-CR

Lynda Renee **SOLOMON**,

Appellant

v.

The **STATE** of Texas,

Appellee

From the 82nd District Court, Falls County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9165

Robert Miller Stem, Judge Presiding

# ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is extended to December 13, 2013. **NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.**

cms

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 22nd day of October, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

VOL.  _____ PAGE _______
#### Mary C. Maitland, Executrix, etc., et al., Appellants, *v.*Amelia M. Whitlock, Respondent.

(Argued June 10, 1872;

decided June 20, 1872.)

*AsKbel Green*for the appellants.

*G. M. Speir*for the respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

Judgment affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Belmont Paper Box Co., Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, *v.*John Stephen, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

Submitted October 4, 1943;

decided October 21, 1943.

*James 1. Cuff*for motion,

*Isidor Glasgal*opposed.

Motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal thereof upon the argument of the appeal.
ex10_1.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





  











  











  





  











  









 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  









 




  





  











  









\
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6781 

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine Debris Program 

of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Ms. BONAMICI (for herself and Mrs. GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine 

Debris Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MARINE DEBRIS 

4 PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND 

5 ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. 

6 Section 9(a) of the Marine Debris Act (33 U.S.C. 

7 1958(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘for’’ the first place it 

8 appears and all that follows through ‘‘carrying out’’ and 

2 

•HR 6781 IH

1 inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2028 for 

2 carrying out’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     6/28/98  CONDENSED   CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEET  AND  THE  STATEMENT  OF
     OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
     BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                          46,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                       384
<INVENTORY>                                      6,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,043
<PP&E>                                          12,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,979
<SALES>                                         18,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,035
<CGS>                                            4,472
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                       924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        


</TABLE>
#### Farrar *v.*Empire Talc *&*Lumber Company *et al.*

Bell, Justice.

1. In a suit by a stockholder for rescission and cancellation of a deed alleged to have been made in behalf of the corporation by the president without authority of the directors or stockholders and for an inadequate consideration, where a copy of the deed was attached to the petition and recited that it was made in pursuance of and in accordance with a lease contract '“with option to purchase said property,” which antedated the deed by nearly two years, and which lease contract had been transferred by the lessee to the persons named as grantees in the deed, and there is no allegation attacking the recital or showing that the lease with option to purchase was not a valid and binding contract as against the corporation, the petition when considered on general demurrer must be construed as showing that the corporation was under a leg'al and binding obligation to execute the deed in question, and consequently that the Anal sale and conveyance, the only transaction complained of, did not result in injury to the corporation or its stockholders, notwithstanding the averments as to want of authority in the president. Code, §§ 22-710, 22-711, 37-106; *Blaisdell*v. *Bohr,*77 *Ga.*381; *Hand*v. *Dexter,*41 *Ga.*454; *Smith*v. *Albright-England Co.,*171 *Ga.*544 (3) (156 S. E. 313); *Krueger*v. *MacDougald,*148 *Ga.*429 (96 S. E. 867) ; *James*v. *Maddox,*153 *Ga.*208 (3) (111 S. E. 731).

*650No. 13266.

July 13, 1940.

2. The petition failed to state a cause of action, and was properly dismissed on general demurrer.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices eoneur.*

*651*Wright & Willingham,*for plaintiff.

*B. W. Mitchell, W. M. Henderson,*and *Jesse M. Sellers,*for defendants.
#### AVIATION SUPPLIERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner v. Michael P. HUERTA, Administrator, et al., Respondents

No. 16-1202

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 25, 2017

Jason Adam Dickstein, Washington Aviation Group, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

John S. Koppel, Mark B. Stern, Lewis Yelin, Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Before: Tatel and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the record from the Federal Aviation Administration and the briefs and arguments of the parties, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be dismissed.

Because airplanes have a habit of crossing jurisdictional lines, the Federal Aviation Administration and the European Aviation Safety Agency (“EASA”) have a practice of jointly issuing Mainte*645nance Annex Guidance, which describe the requirements for maintaining European Union registered airplanes in American repair centers. Petitioner, a group representing suppliers of parts for airplane repairs, challenges and seeks to enjoin certain Guidance revisions that require parts to have specified documentation before they can be installed on European airplanes. Petitioners also challenge FAA Notice 8900.360 (May 2, 2016), which announced that the FAA and EASA had agreed temporarily to postpone the compliance deadline for that requirement. Petitioner’s objection rests on the proposition that European Union regulations under some circumstances permit the use of parts lacking the documentation' required under the revised Maintenance Annex Guidance. But the Guidance revisions describe EASA’s view of the documentation required to comply with European law, so an injunction against FAA enforcement would provide petitioner’s members no relief. See *Spectrum Five LLC v. Federal Commc’ns Comm’n,*758 F.3d 254, 260-261 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (holding plaintiff lacked standing to challenge agency order because redress of the alleged harm depended on action by “an international organization that is not regulated by our government and therefore not bound by this Court or the [agency]” and because plaintiff failed to show that a favorable ruling would create a “significant increase in the likelihood” that its injury would be redressed). Accordingly petitioner lacks standing and we lack subject matter jurisdiction.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing *en banc.*See Fed. R. Apf. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Executive Officer,
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended August 2, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.
78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Gerald L. StorchGerald L. StorchChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
Exhibit 3.91

                        THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS OF
               INTEGRATED SPECIALISTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.


Chapter 5, Section 500, entitled "Qualifications" is amended by deleting the
same in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof:

"Section 500. Reserved."



                            CERTIFICATE BY SECRETARY

I DO HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:

     That I am the duly elected, qualified, and acting Secretary of Integrated
Specialists Management Services, Inc., and that the foregoing Third Amendment to
the Bylaws of Integrated Specialists Management Services, Inc. was approved by
the Board of Directors on February 23, 2001.


                                                 /s/ [Signature Illegible]
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004981 
<NAME> NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,490
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          15,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   467,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,624
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,814
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>