Bill Richardson 

Governor 

Mayor Richard Greene 

Regional Administrator 

State of New Mexico 

office cf the Governor 

May 2, 2007 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross A venue 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Dear Mayor Greene: 

CJ1 

On behalf of the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), I am pleased to submit fir 

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the enclosed pair of amended state rules as support 

for a request for delegation of authority for certain federal National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

standards. 

On April4, 2007, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board promulgated 

amendments to the following Parts ofthe New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC): 

• 20.2.78 NMAC- Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to 

incorporate by reference federal requirements promulgated by EPA between September 

2, 2001 and November 30, 2006}, and 

• 20.2.82 NMAC - Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source 

Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to incorporate by reference federal 

requirements promulgated by EPA between September 2, 2002 and November 30. 2006). 

The hearing record for these amended rules is attached and includes the filed rules, 

transmittal forms, exhibits, public notices, affidavits ofpublication, and notice of intent to 

present technical testimony. 

NMED seeks delegation of authority from EPA for NESHAP and MACT standards for the 

time periods indicated above, and in doing so, provides the following statements as per the 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2). EPA approved NMED's program for receiving delegation 

of existing and future Clean Air Act Section 112 standards when it granted final interim approval 

to our Title V program on November 18, 1994. NMED reaffirms that it still me.ets the criteria 

State Capitol • Room 400 • Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 • 505-476-2200 • www.governor.state.nm.us 
for receiving delegation of Section 112 standards. NMED is seeking delegation ofNESHAP and 

MACT Standards for both Title V and non-Title V sources. 

The State ofNew Mexico looks forward to EPA's approval ofthe above-mentioned 

delegation request. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Bob 

Spillers ofNMED's Air Quality Bureau at (505) 955-8046. 

BR/mw 

Enclosures 

Cc: Tom Diggs, EPA Region 6 

Ron Curry, NMED Secretary 

Sincerely, 

Bill Richardson 

Governor of New Mexico 

Jim Norton, NMED Environmental Protection Division Director 

Mary Uhl, NMED Air Quality Bureau Chief 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Letter from Governor Richardson to Mayor Greene 
Bill Richardson 

Governor 

Mayor Richard Greene 

Regional Administrator 

State of New Mexico 

office of tfie §oventor 

May2, 2007 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 

1445 Ross A venue 

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 

Dear Mayor Greene: 

On behalf of the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), I am pleased to submit to 

the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the enclosed pair of amended state rules as support 

for a request for delegation of authority for certain federal National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 

standards. 

On April4, 2007, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board promulgated 

amendments to the following Parts of the New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC): 

• 20.2.78 NMAC- Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to 

incorporate by reference federal requirements promulgated by EPA between September 

2, 2001 and November 30, 2006), and 

• 20.2.82 NMAC -Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source 

Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to incorporate by reference federal 

requirements promulgated by EPA between September 2, 2002 and November 30. 2006). 

The hearing record for these arriended rules is attached and includes the filed rules, 

transmittal forms, exhibits, public notices, affidavits of publication, and notice of intent to 

present technical testimony. 

NMED seeks delegation of authority from EPA for NESHAP and MACT standards for the 

time periods indicated above, and in doing so, provides the following statements as per the 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2). EPA approved NMED's program for receiving delegation 

of existing and future Clean Air Act Section 112 standards when it granted final interim approval 

to our Title V program on November 18, 1994. NMED reaffirms that it still meets the criteria 

State Capitol • Room 400 • Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 • 505-476-2200 • www.governor.state.nm.us 
for receiving delegation of Section 112 standards. NMED is seeking delegation ofNESHAP and 

MACT Standards for both Title V and non-Title V sources. 

The State ofNew Mexico looks forward to EPA's approval ofthe above-mentioned 

delegation request. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Bob 

Spillers ofNMED's Air Quality Bureau at (505) 955-8046. 

BR/mw 

Enclosures 

Cc: Tom Diggs, EPA Region 6 

Ron Curry, NMED Secretary 

Sincerely, 

Bill Richardson 

Governor ofNew Mexico 

Jim Norton, NMED Environmental Protection Division Director 

Mary Uhl, NMED Air Quality Bureau Chief 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Transmittal 

Forms Parts 78 and 82 
. . .. ~ : i :· ,._ . , :-, ·: ·~· ..... :.; · · : !.~~ r:·, 

I~ I'-,-

NMAC TRANSMITTAL FORM 

New D Amendment W Renumber D Repeal D Emergency D 

No Yes X Please list attachments 

and Internet site{s) if 

applicable 

Name: Gay Dillingham 

Title: Chair 

5/26/2000 

SRC-2000-02 

·~ 

~ 

IJilb~cv{ 

4/4/07 6/8/07 

1. htto:Uwww.epa.gov/fedrqstr/ 

2. 

3. 

Check if delegated 

authority D 

15'-1 -{)]= 

Date Signed 
NMAC TRANSMITTAL FORM 

New D Amendment [!] Renumber D Repeal D Emergency D 

No Yes X Please list attachments 

and Internet site(s) ff 

applicable 

Name: Gay Dillingham 

Title: Chair 

~·~ SRC-2000-02 

5/26/2000 

1. http:jjwww.epa.gov/fedrgstr/ 

2. 

3. 

6/8/07 

Check if delegated 

authority 0 

5-f- a+ 

Date Signed 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

Effi 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2. 78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Amended Parts 

78 and 82 
This is an amendment to 20.2.78 NMAC, Sections 2 and 9, to be effective June 8, 2007. 

20.2.78.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants which are subject to the requirements of 

40 CFRPart 61, as amended through [September 1, 2001] November 30.2006. 

[06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.78.9 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 61: Except as otherwise provided, the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR 

Part 61, as amended in the Federal Register through [September 1. 2001] November 30. 2006 are hereby 

incorporated into this part [20.2. 78 NMAC]. 

[06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.107 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 

06/08/07] 

20.2.78 NMAC 
This is an amendment to 20.2.82 NMAC, Sections 2 and 8, to be effective June 8, 2007. 

20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, which are subject to the requirements of 

40 CFR Part 63, as amended through [September 1, 2002]November 30. 2006. 

[Rn., 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06/23/00; 

A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC 

(below), the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories as promulgated by the US 

EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as amended in the Federal Register through [September 1, 2Q02] November 30. 2006 are 

hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.82 NMAC). 

[Rn., 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06123/00; 

A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.82 NMAC 1 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Integrated Parts 

78 and 82 
TITLE 20 

CHAPTER2 

PART78 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) 

EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.78.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.100 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants which are subject to the requirements of 

40 CFR Part 61, as amended through November 30,2006. 

[06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.78.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The environmental improvement board "shall promulgate 

regulations and standards in ... air quality management" (NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-8.A) and "regulations adopted 

by the environmental improvement board ... may ... prescribe standards of performance for sources and emissions 

standards for hazardous air pollutants ... " (NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5.C). 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.102 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.4 DURATION: Permanent. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.103 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995, except where a later date is cited at the end of a section or 

paragraph. 

[06/16/95, 08/02/96; 20.2.78.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.104 06/23/00] 

[The latest effective date of any section in this part is June 8, 2007] 

20.2.78.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective of Part 78 of Chapter 2 is to adopt or establish state authority to 

implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants in New Mexico subject to 40 CFR Part 61. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.105 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.7 DEFINITIONS: [RESERVED] 

[20.2.78.7 NMAC - N, 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.8 AMENDMENT AND SUPERSESSION OF PRIOR REGULATIONS: This part amends and 

supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 751, last filed on AprillO, 1994. All references to AQCR 751 

in any other rule shall be understood as a reference to this part. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.8 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.106 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.9 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 61: Except as otherwise provided, the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR 

Part 61, as amended in the Federal Register through November 30, 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part 

[20.2.78 NMAC]. 

[06/l6/95, 08/02/96, 11119/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.107 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 

06/08/07] 

20.2.78.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made 

to the incorporated federal standards: 

A. amend 40 CFR Part 61, Section 61.02, Defmitions, as follows: For the purposes of delegation of 

authority which the Administrator of the United States environmental protection agency may, in his discretion, 

delegate to the secretary of the New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary or his 

authorized representative. 

B. exclude 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts B (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from 

Underground Uranium Mines), H (National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides Other Than Radon 

from Department of Energy Facilities), I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Facilities 

Licensed by the NRC and Federal Facilities not covered by Subpart H), K (National Emission Standard for 

Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants), Q (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions 

20.2.78 NMAC 
from Department of Energy Facilities), R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum 

Stacks), T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings), and W 

(National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings). 

C. the federal emission standards incorporated by this regulation shall not be subject to NMSA 1978, 

Section 74-2-8 [Variances] 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.108 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this part may be viewed at the New 

Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, NM 87502. 

[06116/95; 20.2.78.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.109 06/23/00] 

HISTORY OF 20.2.78 NMAC: 

Pre-NMAC History: The material in this part was derived from that previously filed with the commission of 

public records-state records center and archives. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

07/24/84. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

08118/87. 

EIB/ AQCR 7 51, Air Quality Control Regulation 7 51 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

07/07/88. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

04/27/89. 

EIB/ AQCR 7 51, Air Quality Control Regulation 7 51 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

05/29/90. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

04/22/91. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

04/14/92. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Po11utants, filed 

04/21/93. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

04/12/94. 

History of Repealed Material: [RESERVED] 

Other History: 

EIB/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants (filed 

04/12/94) was renumbered into frrst version of the New Mexico Administrative Code as 20 NMAC 2.78, Emission 

Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/16/95. 

20 NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants (filed 05/17/95), was renumbered, reformatted, 

amended and replaced by 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00. 

20.2.78 NMAC 2 
TITLE 20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

CHAPTER 2 AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) 

PART 82 MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE 

CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.82.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, which are subject to the requirements of 

40 CFR Part 63, as amended through November 30, 2006. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06/23/00; 

A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.82.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: Environmental Improvement Act, NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8 

(A) (4) and (7), and Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 74-2-1 et seq., including specifically, Section 

74-2-5 (A), (B) and (C). Section 74-2-5 (C) provides that "regulations adopted by the environmental improvement 

board may prescribe standards of performance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants ... " 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.102 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.4 DURATION: Permanent. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.4, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 1994, except where a later date is cited at the end of a 

section or paragraph. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.5, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06/23/00] 

[The latest effective date of any section in this part is June 8, 2007] 

20.2.82.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective of this part is to adopt or establish state authority to implement 

emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for the source categories in New Mexico subject to federal standards. 

The US EPA requires New Mexico to adopt such standards in order to implement requirements in Section 112 of the 

Clean Air Act. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.6, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.105 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.7 DEFINITIONS: [Reserved) 

[20.2.82.7 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC 

(below), the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories as promulgated by the US 

EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as amended in the Federal Register through November 30, 2006 are hereby incorporated into 

this part (20.2.82 NMAC). 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06/23/00; 

A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07] 

20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 63.40-63.44 OF SUBPART B (Constructed and 

Reconstructed Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants): The owner or operator of a source subject to these 

provisions, that will be constructing or reconstructing after June 29, 1999, shall not construct or reconstruct unless: 

A. the source has received a maximum achievable control technology (MACT) determination and 

approval from the department under this part; and 

B. the MACT determination and approval has been incorporated into a permit under 20.2.72 NMAC 

-Construction Permits or 20.2.70 NMAC- Operating Permits. 

[08/14/98; 20.2.82.9 NMAC - Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1 08 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made 

to the incorporated federal standards: 

20.2.82 NMAC 
A. general provisions: Amend 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A- General Provisions, Section 63.2, 

Definitions, as follows: For the purposes of delegation of authority which the Administrator of the US EPA may, in 

his or her discretion, delegate to the secretary of the New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means 

the secretary or his/her authorized representative. 

B. variances: The federal emission standards incorporated by this Part shall not be subject to NMSA 

1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances). 

C. constructed and reconstructed major sources: The effective date for incorporation of 40 CFR 

63.40-63.44 of Subpart B under 20.2.82.8 NMAC shall be June 29, 1999. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.1 0 NMAC - Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1 09 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this Part may be viewed at the New 

Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, NM 87502. 

[08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.110 06/23/00] 

HISTORY OF 20.2.82 NMAC: 

Pre-NMAC History: None. 

History of Repealed Material: [RESERVED] 

Other History: 

20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air 

Pollutants, effective ll/27/94. 

20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air 

Pollutants (filed 10/28/94) was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by 20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00. 

20.2.82 NMAC 2 
State of New Mexico 

Environmental Improvement Board 

EIB 06-16(R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2. 78 NMAC -Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC -Maximum Achievable Control Technologies for 

Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Miscellaneous Supporting Documents 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Statement of Reason NMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT 

IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO: 

20.2. 78 NMAC- Emissions Standards For 

Hazardous Air Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology Standards for Source 

Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT 

DEPARTMENT, 

Petitioner. 

EIB No. 06-16(R) 

ORDER AND STATEMENT OF REASONS 

FOR AMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS 

THIS MATTER comes before the New Mexico Environmental hnprovement Board 

("Board") upon a petition filed by the Environmental Protection Division ("Division") of the 

New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED" or "Petitioner") proposing revisions to 

Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants in Title 20, Chapter 2, 

Parts 78 and 82 NMAC. A public hearing was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico on April 4, 

2007, with a quorum of the Board present during the hearing. The Board heard technical 

testimony from Petitioner and admitted exhibits into the record. The Board also received nontechnical testimony and admitted exhibits from Ms. Rebecca Perry-Piper. On April 4, 2007, the 

Board deliberated and voted unanimously to adopt the amendments set forth below in relevant 

part, for the reasons that follow. 
I. AMENDMENTS 

1. The proposed adoption of Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and 

Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants in Title 20, Chapter 2, Parts 78 and 82 NMAC were adopted by 

the Board at its April4, 2007 meeting. See NMED's Exhibits# 1, 2. 

II. STATEMENT OF REASONS 

1. NMED filed its Petition for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to Title 

20, Chapter 2, Parts 78 and 82 of the New Mexico Administrative Code ("NMAC") on 

December 15, 2006. 

2. The Board met at its January 2007 meeting and scheduled a hearing for its April 2007 

meeting. 

3. Notice of Hearing was published in the Albuquerque Journal on February 9, 2007. 

4. Notice of Hearing was published in the New Mexico Register on February 6, 2007. 

5. NMED filed a Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony on March 16, 2007. 

6. A hearing was convened in this matter on April4, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. 

7. Mr. Robert Spillers, Environmental Analyst for the Control Strategies Section of the Air 

Quality Bureau, provided oral and written testimony at the hearing in support of the 

amendments. See NMED's Exhibits# 4. 

8. His testimony established the following: (a) the purpose of the proposed revisions to 

Parts 78 and 82 is to incorporate by reference new rules, corrections, revisions and 

amendments promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

("EPA") regarding the federal National Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Statement of Reasons 06-16(R) 

Page2 

2 
("NESHAP") and Maximum Achievable Control Technology ("MACT") Standards for 

Source categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants; (b) EPA has delegated to New Mexico the 

authority to implement the NESHAP and MACT at affected sources within its 

jurisdiction; (c) the proposed amendments to Part 78 NESHAP rules were published in 

the Federal Register from September 2, 2001 to November 30, 2006; (d) the proposed 

amendments to Part 82 MACT rules were published in the Federal Register from 

September 2, 2002 to November 30, 2006; and (e) the Board's adoption of the proposed 

revisions serves the sole purpose of ensuring that the NMED has the regulatory authority 

to implement the federal requirements pursuant to the delegation from EPA. See 

NMED' s Exhibits # 3, 4. 

9. His testimony established a section-by-section discussion in Part 78, including but not 

limited to: (a) New Mexico's exclusion for radionuclides; (b) benzene waste operators; 

and (c) asbestos. His testimony established a section-by-section discussion in Part 82, 

including but not limited to: (a) pesticide active ingredient productions; (b) stationary 

reciprocating internal combustion engines; (d) reinforced plastic composites production; 

(e) stationary combustion turbines; and (f) national perchloroethylene Air Emissions 

Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities. See NMED's Exhibits# 3, 4. 

10. Mr. Andy Berger, Manager of the Control Strategies Section of the Air Quality Bureau, 

provided oral at the hearing in support of the amendments. 

11. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8(A)(4) (2000) of the Environmental 

Improvement Act and NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(B)(l )-(2) (1992) of the Air Quality 

Control Act, the Board has the authority to adopt rules regarding air quality management. 

Statement ofReasons 06-16(R) 

Page 3 

3 
12. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(A), (B) and (C), the Board shall prevent or 

abate air pollution, and shall adopt rules to attain and maintain ambient air quality 

standards and prevent or abate air pollution. 

13. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(EX1), the Board determines that the 

amendments to Chapter 2 of Title 20 ofNMAC would benefit the public in that it would 

improve air quality and reduce emissions that are harmful to the public. This is 

applicable to sources located near socio-economically disadvantaged communities. 

14. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(E)(l), the Board found the amendments would 

protect health and human safety and the consequences of the amendments would be 

improvement in the air quality of the State. The Board's adoption of new amended 

standards will ensure NMED has regulatory authority to implement the federal 

requirements and allow Air Quality personnel to effectively implement and enforce these 

standards to keep New Mexicans healthy. 

15. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(E)(2), the Board found no evidence that the 

amendments would cause any environmental injustices or any adverse social or cultural 

impact. 

16. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(E)(2), (3), the Board's adoption of the federal 

requirements comports with NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(C)(2) and does not alter the 

substantive obligations of affected sources because affected sources already must comply 

with the federal requirements as promulgated through November 30, 2006. See NMED's 

Exhibits #3,4. 

17. The Board adopted NMED's proposal without any changes. See NMED's Exhibits #1,2. 

Statement of Reasons 06-16(R) 

Page4 

4 
18. Pursuant to the Small Business Regulatory Relief Act, the rule would have no adverse 

impact on small businesses because the federal requirements are simply being 

incorporated into the state rule. 

19. In conclusion, NMED had the authority to bring this petition. 

20. The Board has the authority to approve this petition. 

21. The petition satisfies all applicable procedural requirements. 

22. The proposed replacement regulations satisfy the statutory requirements of NMSA 1978, 

Sections 74-2-5. 

23. The proposed regulations are adopted for any or all of the reasons stated above. 

III. ORDER 

By a unanimous vote, the petition was approved on April 4, 2007. The proposed regulations 

as set forth in Exhibits # 1, 2 with any appropriate corrections of typographical errors, formatting 

or other changes necessary to file this rule with the New Mexico State Records Center, are 

hereby adopted, to be effective 30 days after filing with the State Records Center. 

Statement of Reasons 06-16(R) 

Page 5 

5 

Dated: 5/ '0 1= 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Notice of Transcript Filing NMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

Petition re: Revisions to 20.2.78 and 

20.2.82 NMAC 

NOTICE OF TRANSCRIPT FILING 

lr-.:"it 

f r?' ,,_ 

fN ''t'-

:~ 

·~.,.,-

APR 2007 

Received fnriroi::!i:~m~.:~! lmp.ro~ement 

6~2rd 

You are hereby notified that the complete transcript of the April 4, 2007, hearing 

in the above case was filed on April19, 2007. The transcript is available for review at 

the Boards and Commission's Office, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Room N-2150, Santa Fe, 

New Mexico 87505. A copy can be obtained from Kathy Townsend Court Reporters, 

110 Twelfth Street, NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, telephone: (505) 243-5018. 

_)0?< 

"~ '\:\ ...._. /. ~~-rn . . 0 1 o ce e ina, c.-

Adrriinistrator ~ 

U Environmental Improvement Board 

Post Office Box 26110 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 

(505) 827-2425 p 

(505) 827-2836 F 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the forgoing document was mailed or hand 

delivered on January 9, 2007, to the following: 

U.S. Mail 

Zachary Shandler, Asst. Atty. General 

Office of the Attorney General 

State ofNew Mexico 

P. 0. Box 1508 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 

Hand delivered 

Bill Grantham 

New Mexico Environment Dept. 

Office of General Counsel 

Runnels Bldg. N4050 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 
EIB HEARING, RE· HAPS, 4/4/07 

1 

2 

3 

STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

No. EIB 06-16(R) 

4 IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 

20.2.78 NMAC- EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 

5 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.82 NMAC- MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL 

6 TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE 

CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

7 

B 

9 

10 

11 

12 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 

13 

14 BE IT REMEMBERED that on the 4th day of April, 

15 2007, the above-entitled matter came on for hearing 

16 before the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board, 

17 taken at Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting Room A, 

18 6900 Gonzales Road, Southwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 

19 at the hour of 5:15 p.m. 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

1 A P P E A R A N C E S 

2 

1 

2 

I N D E X 

3 WITNESSES: 

4 ROBERT SPILLERS and ANDY BERGER 

5 

6 

7 

B 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Direct Examination of Robert Spillers 

by Mr. Grantham 

Cross Examination by the Board 

1 EXHIBITS 

PAGE 

6 

16 

3 For the Environmental Improvement Board: 2 MARKED/ADMITTED 

4 GAY DILLINGHAM, Chair 

KATHI BEARDEN, Vice Chair 

5 DOLORES HERRERA, Secretary 

GREGORY GREEN 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

HAROLD TSO 

SOREN PETERS 

ZACH SHANDLER 

Assistant Attorney General 

office of the Attorney General 

Post office Box 1508 

Bataan Memorial Building 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 

11 For the New Mexico Environment Department: 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

BILL GRANTHAM 

Assistant General Counsel 

1190 St. Francis Drive 

Harold Runnels Building 

santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 

3 NMED: 

4 1. Proposed 20.2.78 NMAC - Emission 

5 

6 2. 

7 

8 

9 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Proposed 20.2.82 NMAC - Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants 

10 3. List of Federal Register notices 

11 4. Direct Testimony of Robert Spillers 

12 PERRY-PIPER: 

13 1. Letter, January 31, 2007, to Joyce 

14 Medina from Rebecca G. "Gert" 

15 Perry-Piper, with attachments 

16 2. Letter, February 17, 2007, to Joyce 

17 Medina from Rebecca G. "Gert" 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Perry-Piper, with attachments 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 

16 

16 

16 

16 

25 

25 
EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

1 MR. GREEN: Let's get started. Let's get 

2 started with the hearing. 

3 This hearing is now open. This hearing is in 

4 EIB 06-16(R) to consider proposed revisions to 20.2.78 

5 and 20.2.82. 

6 My name is Gregory Green. I'm the EIB Board 

7 member who has been designated as Hearing officer in 

8 this matter. 

9 For the record, the time is now 5:15. We're 

10 meeting in Albuquerque. 

11 As usual, the hearing procedures are as 

12 follows: 

13 Testimony will be taken under oath. 

14 Optional opening statements. 

15 Department witnesses will testify as a panel. 

16 Cross-examinations of the Department's 

17 witnesses. 

18 Department's rebuttal. 

19 other parties' witnesses. 

20 Public comment. 

21 Optional closing statements. 

22 I'm not aware of any prehearing issues, so we 

23 can begin with the optional opening statements. 

24 MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, I have no 

1 environmental science and management from New Mexico 

2 Highlands university, Las vegas, New Mexico. 

3 Q. And are you familiar with the subject matter 

4 of this hearing? 

5 A. Yes. I have researched and assembled the 

6 material to be incorporated for each of the proposed 

7 revisions and exhibits and prepared today's testimony. 

8 Q. And what is your purpose here today? 

9 A. Madam chair, Mr. Hearing officer, and members 

10 of the Board, I'm here to present the Department's 

11 proposed amendments to the air quality control 

12 regulations 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission Standards for 

13 Hazardous Air Pollutants, and 20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 

14 Achievable Control Technology -- Control Technology 

15 Standards for source Categories of Hazardous Air 

16 Pollutants. 

17 From now on, I will refer to these rules as 

18 Parts 78 and 82 respectively. 

19 The purpose of -- the proposed revisions to 

20 Part 78 are shown in Exhibit NMED 1, and the proposed 

21 revisions to Part 82 are shown in Exhibit NMED 2. New 

22 material is shown as underlined with deleted material 

23 shown as bracketed and strike-out. 

24 The purpose of the proposed revisions is to 

25 opening statement. I'd like to proceed with examination 25 incorporate by reference new rules, corrections, 

1 of the witness. 

2 MR. GREEN: Please proceed. 

3 ROBERT SPILLERS and ANDY BERGER 

4 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, were 

5 examined and testified as follows: 

6 DIRECT EXAMINATION DF ROBERT SPILLERS 

7 BY MR. GRANTHAM: 

8 Q. Mr. Spillers, can you please state your name 

9 for the record? 

10 

11 

12 

A. My name is Robert Spillers, S-P-I-L-L-E-R-S. 

Q. And where are you employed? 

A. I'm employed by the New Mexico Environment 

13 Department Air Quality Bureau in the Control Strategies 

14 Section. 

15 Q. And how long have you been in that position, 

16 sir? 

17 A. I have been with the Centro 1 strategies 

18 Section since September of 2005. 

19 Q. And can you describe the nature of your 

20 employment in the Control Strategies Section? 

21 A. My duties consist of regulatory revisions, 

22 development of regulations for various sources that are 

23 currently unregulated and public outreach. 

1 revisions and amendments the Environmental Protection 

2 Agency, EPA, has made to the federal National Emission 

3 Standards for Hazardous Air. Pollutants, NESHAP, and to 

4 Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards for 

5 source categories of hazardous air pollutants, MACT. 

6 The EPA has delegated to New Mexico --

7 MR. GREEN: I'm sorry. slow down just a 

8 little bit. Some of these are long, technical words to 

9 type out. 

10 MR. SPILLERS: Okay. I'm sorry. 

11 The EPA has delegated to New Mexico the 

12 authority to implement the NESHAP and MACT at affected 

13 sources within its jurisdiction. 

14 The proposed amendments to Parts 78 and 82 are 

15 date changes, which can be seen in Exhibit NMED 1 and 

16 NMED 2. The proposed date changes will reflect the most 

17 recent date that the federal rules have been 

18 incorporated into the state rules. 

19 The NESHAP Federal Register notices were 

20 published from September 2nd, 2001, to November 30th, 

21 2006, and the MACT Federal Register notices were 

22 published from September 2nd, 2002, to November 30th, 

23 2006. 

24 Q. And what is your educational background? 24 A list of the Federal Register notices is in 

25 A. I have a bachelor's of science degree in 25 Exhibit NMED 3, which is accompanied by a complete set 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

9 

1 of the Federal Register notices, which are included on 

2 the CD. 

3 It is standard procedure to simultaneously 

4 revise Part 77, 20.2.77 NMAC, New Source Performance 

5 Standards, w1th Parts 78 and 82. However, Part 77 

6 proposed revisions will be concurrent with the New 

7 Mexico mercury rule. 

8 Q. (BY MR. GRANTHAM) What is the Board's 

9 authority to adopt new and amended NESHAPs and MACTs 

10 into state regulations? 

11 A. The Board is authorized by section 74-2-5.C(2) 

12 of the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act to adopt 

13 performance standards and emission standards for 

14 hazardous air pollutants. Such standards shall be no 

15 more stringent than but at least as stringent as the 

16 federal requirements. 

17 The Board's adoption of the federal 

18 requirements comports with this statutory limitation and 

19 does not alter the substantive obligations of affected 

20 sources because affected sources already must comply 

21 w1th the federal requirements as promulgated through 

22 November 30th, 2006. 

23 Q. what is the effect of the Board's adoption of 

24 new and amended NESHAPs and MACTs into the regulations? 

25 A. The Board's adoption of new and amended NESHAP 

10 

1 and MACT ensures that the Division has the regulatory 

2 authority to implement the federal requirements pursuant 

3 to the delegation agreement with EPA. 

4 Q. And can you explain why the Board should adopt 

5 the proposed revisions to Part 78 and Part 82? 

6 A. The Board's adoption of the proposed revisions 

7 benefits New Mexico. The EPA delegated to New Mexico 

8 the authority to implement the NESHAP on March 15th, 

9 1985, and delegated -- by delegatin~ to New Mexico the 

10 authority to implement the MACT on July 27th, 1995. 

11 Under the delegation agreements, the Division 

12 must update its regulations regularly to reflect the 

13 current federal requirements for NSPS, NESHAP and MACT. 

14 Both the EPA and regulated sources prefer that 

15 New Mexico implement the NESHAP and MACT. State 

16 implementation conserves federal resources, and the 

17 federal requirements are more effectively implemented 

18 and enforced by the same Air Quality Bureau personnel 

19 who review permit applications, issue permits, test and 

20 inspect regulated sources in New Mexico. 

1 believe, has a question. I assume it's about the 

2 acronyms. 

MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. 

11 

3 

4 MS. HERRERA: I didn't hear you define the 

5 acronyms NESHAP and MACT. 

6 MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. The NESHAP --

7 

8 

9 

MS. HERRERA: Thank you, Mr. Hearing Officer. 

MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. 

Oh, Mr. Hearing Officer, NESHAP is National 

10 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. And 

11 the MACT is Maximum Achievable control Technology 

12 standards for source categories of hazardous air 

13 po 11 utants. 

14 MR. GREEN: I thought they were Bible 

15 characters, but go ahead. 

16 

17 Q. 

MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. 

(BY MR. GRANTHAM) Mr. Spillers, can you 

18 please describe in a little more detail the NESHAP and 

19 give some examples of the proposed changes? 

20 A. The EIB first adopted the National Emission 

21 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, NESHAP, by 

22 reference in 1984. The NESHAP are set forth in Title 40 

23 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 61, 40 CFR Part 

24 61. 

25 The Department is proposing that Part 78 be 

12 

1 amended to incorporate by reference the federal 

2 requirements pertaining to the NESHAP rules promulgated 

3 by the EPA from september 2nd, 2001, through 

4 November 30th, 2006. 

5 This is a periodic incorporation of the 

6 federal standards which is part of the Department's 

7 delegation authority agreement with the EPA. There are 

8 eight changes to the NESHAP during this time period. 

9 Many of the NESHAP changes are not substantive. 

10 I w1ll review a few examples of the type of 

11 changes made to the regulations. A complete list of the 

12 changes can be reviewed in Exhibit NMED 3. 

13 First, there was only one final rule that was 

14 promulgated during this time period. However, this 

15 NESHAP is for radionuclides. New Mexico made the 

16 decision not to adopt this portion of the NESHAP. 

17 subsection lOB of Part 78 presently excludes 

18 subparts H and I from incorporation by reference. 

19 Therefore, the proposed amendments to the effective 

20 dates in Part 78 will not affect these subparts. In 

21 Potential disputes regarding NESHAP and MACT 21 other words, Subparts H and I w1ll continue to be 

22 are more effectively resolved at the state level, 22 excluded. 

23 although the Division routinely consults with the EPA to 23 This can be seen in NMED 3.1. 

24 ensure -- ensure consistency with national practice. 24 Second is a partial withdrawal of the direct 

25 MR. GREEN: Mr. Spiller, Ms. Herrera, I 25 final rule for benzene waste operations that is due to 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

1 an adverse comment that was received on one of the 

2 provisions. 

3 This can be seen in NMED 3.3. 

13 

4 Third is a direct final rule amendment that 

5 will amend the citation for labeling containers of 

6 asbestos waste material which is based on requirements 

7 from the Occupational safety and Health Administration, 

8 OSHA. 

9 And this is in NMED 3.5. 

10 Q. And could you describe the Maximum Achievable 

11 Control Technology, MACT, and give some examples of the 

12 proposed changes? 

13 A. The EIB first adopted Maximum Achievable 

14 control Technology standards, MACT, by reference in 

15 1994. The standards are set forth in Title 40 of the 

16 Code of Federal Regulations Part 63, 40 CFR Part 63. 

17 The Department is proposing that the-- that 

18 Part 82 be amended to incorporate by reference the 

19 federal requirements pertaining to the MACT standards 

20 for source categories of hazardous air pollutants 

21 promulgated by the EPA from September 2nd, 2002, to 

22 November 30th, 2006. 

23 This is a periodic incorporation of federal 

24 standards which is part of the Department's delegation 

25 authority to work with EPA. There are 137 MACT changes 

14 

1 during this time period. 

2 Some example of the changes to the MACT are, 

3 first, there are two new rules that apply to the MACT. 

4 One is for surface coating of plastic parts and 

5 products, and the second is for reinforced plastic 

6 composite production. 

7 These processes emit hazardous air pollutants 

8 that have an adverse health -- adverse effects on 

9 health. These rules will establish emission standards 

10 and requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous 

11 compliance with the emission limitations. 

12 These are in NMED 3.27 and NMED 3.55. 

13 Second, in this final rule, EPA is revising 

14 its standards to limit emissions of perchloroethylene, 

15 

1 nor to impose any requirements on such operations by 

2 direct final rule. 

3 This is NMED 3.75. 

4 These are just -- these are a few examples of 

5 the Federal Register notices that have been published 

6 during the time period noted. The complete list can be 

7 viewed in Exhibit NMED 3. As stated previously, this is 

8 a periodic incorporation of federal standards which is 

9 part of the Department's delegation authority agreement 

10 with the EPA. 

11 State implementation conserves federal 

12 resources, federal requirements are more effectively 

13 implemented, and potential disputes are more effectively 

14 resolved at the state level through the adoption of 

15 these rules. 

16 The Board's adoption of these new and amended 

17 NESHAP and MACT standards 1vi 11 ensure that New Me xi co --

18 that the New Mexico Environment Department has 

19 regulatory authority to implement the federal 

20 requirements and allow air quality personnel to 

21 effectively implement and enforce these standards to 

22 keep New Mexico healthy and our skies blue. 

23 MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, I would 

24 like to move that the Board adopt the exhibits as listed 

25 in the notice of intent into the record at this point. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

MR. GREEN: Any objections? 

seeing none, so adopted. 

16 

(Exhibits NMED 1 through 4 were marked for 

identification and admitted into evidence.) 

MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing Officer, I have no 

6 further questions of the panel, unless there are any 

7 comments the panel would like to make. 

8 CROSS EXAMINATION 

9 BY THE BOARD: 

10 MR. GREEN: Mr. Berger, just because we're on 

11 a new hearing, would you state your name for the record? 

12 we'll stipulate to your expertise, your 

13 position and your education. 

14 MR. BERGER: My name is Andy Berger, last name 

15 PEC, PEC, from new and existing dry cleaning facilities. 15 is B-E-R-G-E-R. 

16 EPA reviewed the standards from 1993 -- from the 1993 16 I have a bachelor of science degree in 

17 rule in taking into account new developments in 17 integrated science and technology from James Madison 

18 production practices, processes and control technologies 18 university. 

19 that are setting more stringent standards. 19 I'm employed as the manager of the control 

20 This is in NMED 3.140. 20 Strategies Section at the New Mexico Environment 

21 And third is in -- in this example is an 21 Department's Air Quality Bureau. 

22 amendment to the final rule for printing, coating and 22 I did want to, for the Board's clarification, 

23 dying of fabrics and other textiles. The purpose of 

24 this amendment is to clarify that EPA did not intend to 

25 include any synthetic fiber manufacturing operations, 

23 again point out that the proposed changes to Parts 78 

24 and 82 are similar to those that you heard testimony on 

25 on Part 77 in the hearing earlier today on the matter of 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

17 

1 EIB 06-15 (R). 

2 Again, this is a periodic practice of the 

3 Department, to propose to the Board to revise dates 

4 within these state rules to incorporate by reference 

5 these federal regulations. 

6 This enables -- as Mr. Spillers testified to, 

7 this enables the Department to take responsibility and 

8 authority for enforcement of these federal standards 

9 here in this state. 

10 we're also complying with our stringency 

1 

19 

MR. BERGER: I believe the -- I believe we 

2 have some language in our statute that limits our 

3 ability to regulate radionuclides from an air quality 

4 perspective. 

5 MR. TSO: Even -- Mr. Hearing officer, even 

6 though the radiation protection group -- bureau is with 

7 that expertise, you can't do this? 

8 MR. BERGER: I'm not very familiar with the --

9 with the work of the Radiation Control Bureau that's 

10 part of the Environment Department. I think the Air 

11 language in proposing these date changes within Parts 78 11 Quality Control Act may contain some -- some language 

12 and 82. 12 limiting our ability to regulate radionuclides. 

13 MR. GRANTHAM: I have no more questions. 

14 MR. GREEN: And for the Board, I know that we 

15 are in a hurry to get out of here and this only looks 

16 like a date change, but I do want the Board to 

17 understand that by adopting this date change, you are, 

18 in effect, adopting very substantial changes that the 

19 federal government has made in these regulations, and 

20 you're adopting them into New Mexico regulations. 

21 Is that correct? 

22 

23 

24 

25 

MR. BERGER: By reference, yes. 

MR. GREEN: By reference. 

MS. HERRERA: what is the choice? 

MR. GREEN: Do you have a question? 

MS. DILLINGHAM: Do we have a choice? 

18 

1 

2 MR. BERGER: You do have a choice. You can 

3 elect to not adopt the date changes. In that case, the 

4 state Environment Department will be in a position of 

5 having delegated authority for some of these standards, 

6 some of these NESHAP and MACT standards, some of these 

7 NSPS standards that we addressed in the earlier hearing 

8 today. 

9 But in the case of the NESHAP and MACT 

10 standards, if you don't adopt the proposal before you 

11 today, the Department would be in the position of not 

12 having delegated authority for these -- these latest 

13 federal standards. 

14 That -- in essence, that will mean that the 

15 federal EPA will be the responsible agency for 

16 enforcement of those standards. 

17 MR. GREEN: And I'm comfortable with the ones 

18 you left out. 

19 Is the Board comfortable with those provisions 

20 that were left out? And the reasons why? 

21 

22 

23 

MR. TSO: Mr. Hearing Officer. 

MR. GREEN: Mr. Tso. 

MR. TSO: I'd just like an explanation on Part 

24 78, the section dealing with radionuclides, why that is 

25 excluded, just an explanation. 

13 MR. TSO: I just need something to hang my hat 

14 on here. Why don't we include radionuclides? I mean, 

15 why aren't we -- isn't it a part of New Mexico NESHAPs? 

16 

17 

18 

MR. BERGER: I --

MR. STILLERS: Go ahead. 

MR. BERGER: I believe it depends on that 

19 statutory language, that I would regret to say I would 

20 have to look at the statute to be absolutely sure about 

21 that. 

22 MR. TSO: Is the Radiation Control Bureau 

2 3 doing this also in addition to its work, NESHAPs, 

24 radionuclides? 

25 MR. BERGER: I don't believe we'd be able to 

20 

1 answer that. I don't know. 

2 

3 

MR. SPILLERS: I can't answer that one either. 

MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing Officer, if the 

4 Board does not object, the Department does have other 

5 personnel here who might be able to answer that 

6 question, that we could call Rita as a witness. 

7 

8 sworn? 

9 

10 

11 

MR. GREEN: Rita, would you stand and be 

MS. TRUJILLO: Sure. 

(RITA TRUJILLO was duly sworn or affirmed.) 

MR. GREEN: Rita, can you answer Mr. Tso's 

12 questions? 

13 

14 

MS. TRUJILLO: Sure. 

My name is Rita Trujillo. I'm the Planning 

15 and Policy Section Manager for the Air Quality Bureau. 

16 We have looked several times at taking a 

17 delegation of the radionuclide NESHAPs. However, we 

18 really don't have the expertise on staff to do that. 

19 we started to develop that expertise several 

2 0 years ago, before I started, and I've been with the 

21 Bureau for nine years. We started to --we looked at 

22 that, we thought about taking it over, and we actually 

23 even trained some people, and then they left after they 

24 got trained for much higher paying jobs elsewhere. 

25 And so we never -- we never took on that 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

21 

1 responsibility. It's a very highly technical and 

2 difficult thing that we just really don't have any 

3 in-house expertise. 

4 So EPA out of Region 6, out of Dallas, 

5 actually --we just didn't take delegation for that, and 

6 they are the ones who handle the enforcement of that, of 

7 those NESHAPs. 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

MR. GREEN: Mr. Tso. 

MR. TSO: That's fine, Mr. Hearing Officer. 

Thank you, MS. Trujillo, Mr. Hearing Officer. 

MR. GREEN: Further questions from the Board? 

MS. DILLINGHAM: I have a question on the 

13 benzene operations, waste operations. 

14 Are these changes making it more or less 

15 stringent? 

16 And I'm asking that partly because I'm aware 

17 of the spill that took place up in Espanola from a small 

18 dry cleaning operation that created a Superfund site. 

19 So it's a serious po 11 utant. 

20 MR. BERGER: Is that -- I'm sorry. Is that 

21 part of NESHAPs or the --

22 

23 

24 

25 

1 revised? 

2 

MR. SPILLERS: It's part of NESHAPs. 

MS. DILLINGHAM: It's Part 78. 

MR. SPILLERS: If you can give me a minute. 

MR. BERGER: Is that a new rule, or is that a 

22 

MR. SPILLERS: I can quote out of the notice 

3 itself, if that would be all right. 

4 MS. DILLINGHAM: Well, I mean, I would like to 

5 assume that it's more stringent because there's a change 

6 taking place, but I can't necessarily assume that. So 

7 I'd like your professional opinion about whether or not, 

8 in fact, it is an improvement or if it's literally a 

9 housekeeping -- it might be a housekeeping matter, but 

10 it doesn't say in the summary. 

11 (Discussion off the record.) 

12 MS. TRUJILLO: If I could, one thing I'd like 

13 to make clear is whether or not we -- we have the 

14 jurisdiction or the delegation in New Mexico to enforce 

15 these requirements. They're still requirements that can 

16 be forced -- in force by EPA, and facilities will be 

17 required-- are already required and will continue to be 

18 required to comply with these, because they are federal 

19 rules that apply to those requirements. 

20 This isn't the case like you heard in the 

21 previous hearing, where we had some flexibility in how 

22 to adopt the requirements for the New Source Performance 

23 Standard for mercury. They gave us some flexibility in 

24 how to adopt that. 

25 These requirements -- these rules do not have 

23 

1 those same kinds of flexibility built in, so they will 

2 either be enforced by the State of New Mexico, if the 

3 Board adopts these date changes, or they will be 

4 enforced by federal EPA, in the absence of that 

5 adoption. 

6 MR. GREEN: And let me make sure I understand 

7 your answer one step further. 

8 So on benzene, we are not allowed to be more 

9 stringent than the federal level. 

10 MS. TRUJILLO: we are not allowed to be any 

11 more stringent on any of these than the federal 

12 requirements. 

13 MR. GREEN: Does that answer your question, or 

14 do you still want the answer? 

15 MS. DILLINGHAM: I understand it's a yes or 

16 no, up or down kind of hearing. 

17 You know, I was curious to know are we 

18 generally weakening or strengthening, and it's okay if 

19 we don't have that answer right now. 

20 MR. BERGER: I think in regards to the 

21 specific NESHAP you asked about, there's -- Exhibit 3.3 

2 2 is the notice about this parti a 1 wi thdrawa 1 of the fi na 1 

23 rule, national emission standards for benzene waste 

24 operations. 

25 It looks like from the notice here what they 

24 

1 did is on November 12th, 2002, publish two proposals for 

2 an emission standard for this hazardous air pollutant 

3 from this source category. It looks like they -- EPA 

4 received some adverse comments on provisions related to 

5 control devices in new -- in the new compliance option 

6 for tanks equipped with an enclosure in -- and then they 

7 give a citation of some of the federal rules. 

8 They say in this notice that they are 

9 withdrawing -- withdrawing 40 CFR Part 61.343 (d), 

10 introductory text, and withdrawing and reserving 

11 paragraph (e)(ii) that appeared in that earlier NESHAP, 

12 which, based on the date, should also be included in --

13 in this incorporation by reference. 

14 They say in this notice that they will address 

15 the adverse comments in subsequent final review based on 

16 a parallel proposal published back at the original time. 

17 So it looks like they published two proposals for 

18 regulating benzene from creating emission standards for 

19 benzene waste operations. 

20 one of them created some compliance 

21 requirements for tanks. They received what amounts to 

22 one adverse comment, and so they're withdrawing those 

2 3 provisions and wi 11 in a subsequent direct fi na 1 rule 

24 promulgate a parallel final rule. 

25 MS. DILLINGHAM: Thank you. 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
2 

3 

4 

5 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

I don't have any more questions. 

MS. HERRERA: Thank you, Gay. 

25 

MR. GREEN: Further questions from the Board? 

Closing statements? 

MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, by way of 

6 closing statement, I would simply respectfully request 

7 the Board to adopt the proposed changes to 20.2.78 and 

8 20.2.82 NMAC for the reasons explained by the witnesses. 

9 

10 

MR. GREEN: counsel have any housekeeping? 

MR. SHANDLER: one piece of housekeeping. 

11 For the record, there's two public 

12 documents -- or public comments documents submitted by 

13 Ms. Piper, and I'd ask that you admit those into the 

14 record. 

15 MR. GREEN: So admitted. 

16 

17 

18 

(Exhibits Perry-Piper 1 and 2 were marked for 

identification and admitted into evidence.) 

MR. GREEN: At this time, I'm going to close 

19 the record and turn it over to our Chair. 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

MS. DILLINGHAM: Thank you. 

(Proceedings adjourned at 5:42 p.m.) 

1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

2 ss. 

3 COUNTY OF BERNALILLO 

4 

5 

26 

6 I, CHERYL ARREGUIN, the officer before whom the 

7 foregoing proceeding was taken, do hereby certify that 

8 the witnesses whose testimony appears in the foregoing 

9 transcript were duly sworn or affirmed; that I 

10 personally recorded the testimony by machine shorthand; 

11 that said transcript is a true record of the testimony 

12 given by said witnesses; that I am neither attorney nor 

13 counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of the 

14 parties to the action in which this proceeding is taken, 

15 and that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney 

16 or counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially 

17 interested in the action. 

18 

19 

20 

21 

NOTARY PUBLIC 

CCR License Number: 21 

Expires: 12/31/07 

22 My Commission Expires: 12/12/07 

23 

24 

25 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
0 

06-15(R) 111 - 17:1 

06-16(R 121- 1:3, 5:4 

I 

1 

1 [6]- 4:4, 4:13, 7:20, 

8:15, 16:3, 25:16 

10B[1]-12:17 

1190 (1]- 2:13 

12/12/07 [1]- 26:22 

12/31/07 [1]- 26:20 

12th [1] - 24:1 

137 [1]- 13:25 

1508 (1]- 2:9 

15th [1]- 10:8 

16 [5]- 3:7, 4:5, 4:9, 

4:10,4:11 

17[1]-4:16 

1984[1]-11:22 

1985 [1]- 10:9 

1993 [2] - 14:16 

1994[1]-13:15 

1995 [1] - 10:10 

2 

2[5]-4:6, 4:16,7:21, 

8:16, 25:16 

20.2.77 [1]- 9:4 

20.2.78 [5] - 1:4, 4:4, 

5:4, 7:12, 25:7 

20.2.82 [5] - 1:5, 4:6, 

5:5, 7:13, 25:8 

2001 [2]- 8:20, 12:3 

2002 [3] - 8:22, 

13:21' 24:1 

2005[1]- 6:18 

2006 [5] - 8:21' 8:23, 

9:22, 12:4, 13:22 

2007[3]-1:15, 4:13, 

4:16 

21 [1]- 26:20 

25 [2]- 4:15, 4:18 

27th [1]- 10:10 

2nd [41- 8:20, 8:22, 

12:3, 13:21 

3 

I 3 [4] _ 4:10. 8:25. 

112:12, 15:7 

3.1 [1] - 12:23 

3.140[1]- 14:20 

3.27 [1]-14:12 

3.3[2]- 13:3, 23:21 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

3.5 [1]- 13:9 8:25 AIR£2]-1:5, 1:6 

3.55 [1]- 14:12 account [1]- 14:17 Alamosap]-1:17 

3.75 [1]- 15:3 ACHIEVABLE 111- Albuquerque [21 -

30th [5]- 8:20, 8:22, 1:5 1:18,5:10 

9:22, 12:4, 13:22 Achievable [6]- 4:7, allow 111 - 15:20 

31 (1]- 4:13 7:14, 8:4, 11:11' allowed [21 - 23:8, 

13:10, 13:13 23:10 

4 acronyms 121 - 11:2. alter[1]- 9:19 

11:5 amend [1]-13:5 

Act£2]-9:12, 19:11 amended [61 - 9:9, 

4[2]-4:11, 16:3 action 121 - 26:14, 9:24,9:25, 12:1, 

40 (5] - 11 :22, 11 :23, 26:17 13:18, 15:16 

13:15, 13:16, 24:9 addition 111- 19:23 amendment £31 - 4th [1]- 1:14 address [1]- 24:14 13:4, 14:22, 14:24 

5 

addressed [11- 18:7 amendments [4] -

adjourned 111 - 7:11' 8:1' 8:14, 12:19 

25:21 amounts 111- 24:21 

5:15 [2]- 1:19, 5:9 Administration 111 - Andy[11- 16:14 

5:42 [1] - 25:21 13:7 ANDY 121 - 3:4, 6:3 

I admit 111- 25:13 answer[B]- 20:1, 

I 6 admitted [3]- 16:4, 20:2, 20:5, 20:11' 

~ 125o15, 25o17 23:7, 23:13, 23:14, 

adopt [10l- 9:9, 23:19 

6 [2] - 3:6, 21:4 9:12, 10:4, 12:16, appeared [11- 24:11 

61 [2] - 11 :23, 11 :24 I 15:24, 18:3, 18:10, applications 111 -

61.343(d [1]· 24:9 22:22, 22:24, 25:7 10:19 

63 [2] - 13: 16 adopted [3]- 11:20, apply[2]- 14:3, 

6900 [1]- 1:18 13:13, 16:2 22:19 

adopting £31 - 17:17, April 111- 1:14 

7 17:18, 17:20 ARREGUIN 111- 26:6 

adoption [7]- 9:17, asbestos 111 - 13:6 

74-2-5.C(2 111- 9:11 

9:23, 9:25, 10:6, assembled [1]- 7:5 

15:14, 15:16, 23:5 Assistant 121 - 2:8, 77 [3]- 9:4, 9:5, adopts 111 - 23:3 2:12 

16:25 

78[12]-7:18, 7:20, 

adverse[6]-13:1, assume [3]- 11:1, 

8:14,9:5, 10:5, 11:25, 

14:8, 24:4, 24:15, 22:5,22:6 

112:17, 12:20, 16:23, 

24:22 attachments [21 -

affect 111- 12:20 4:15, 4:18 

~17:11, 18::4, 21:~-3- affected [3]- 8:12, Attorney 121 - 2:8, 

9:19, 9:20 2:8 

affirmed £31 - 6:4, attorney[2]- 26:12, 

20:10, 26:9 26:15 

~ 82"' - 7o1 8, 1021, agency[1]-18:15 authority[12J- 8:12, 

:14, 9:5, 10:5, 13:18, Agency 111- 8:2 9:9, 10:2, 10:8, 10:10, 

6:24, 17:12 ago [1] - 20:20 12:7, 13:25, 15:9, 

87502 [1]- 2:14 agreement [3] - 10:3, 15:19, 17:8, 18:5, 

87504[1]- 2:10 12:7, 15:9 18:12 

agreements [11 - authorized [11- 9:11 

A 10:11 aware 121- 5:22, 

-- ahead 121- 11 :15, 21:16 

19:17 

ability 121 - 19:3, Air[13J- 4:5, 4:9, B 

19:12 6:13,7:13, 7:15, 8:3, 

able 121 - 19:25, 20:5 9:12, 10:18, 11:10, 

above-entitled 111 - 11:21, 16:21,19:10, B·E·R-G-E-R 111 -

1:15 20:15 16:15 

absence 111- 23:4 air [9] - 7:11, 8:5, bachelor[1]- 16:16 

absolutely 111- 9:14, 11:12, 13:20, bachelor's 111- 6:25 

19:20 14:7, 15:20, 19:3, background 111 -

accompanied [11 - 24:2 I 6:24 

i 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 

based [31 -13:6, 

24:12, 24:1 

Bataan 111 

5 

-2:9 

BE£1]-1: 14 

BEARCE 

begin(1]-

benefits r 

benzene 

1 

N111- 2:4 

5:23 

1]-10:7 

[6]- 12:25, 

I 21:13, 23:8 • 23:23, 

I 

I 

I 

24:18,24:1 

Berger[2] 

16:14 

BERGER 

6:3, 16:14, 

18:2, 19:1, 

19:16, 19:1 

21:20,21:2 

BERNALI 

26:3 

9 

- 16:10, 

[13]- 3:4, 

17:22, 

19:8, 

8, 19:25, 

5, 23:20 

LL0[1lBible 111-

BILL[1]-

11:14 

2:12 

bit [1]- 8: 8 

bluep]-1 

BOARD12 

5:22 

]- 1 :1' 

16:9 

Board [17] - 1:16, 

6, 7:10, 

15:24, 

2:3, 3:7, 5: 

9:11, 10:4, 

17:3, 17:14 • 17:16, 

18:19, 20:4, 21:11, 

23:3,25:3, 25:7 

Board'sr 

9:17, 9:23, 

7]- 9:8, 

9:25, 10:6, 

15:16, 16:2 2 

Box [1]- 2: 9 

bracketed [1]-7:23 

Building[ 2]- 2:9, 

2:13 

built 111- 2 3:1 

Bureau£71 - 6:13, 

1, 19:9, 

5, 20:21 

- 19:6 

'9:8, 

10:18, 16:2 

19:22, 20:1 

bureau111 

BY[4]- 6:7 

11:17, 16:9 

f--

I 

c ---i 

case[3]-1 

22:20 

categorie 

i 

:;:·_1:~~· i 

11:12, 13:2 0 

CATEGO RIE5[1]-

1:6 

Categorie s [2]- 4:8, 

7:15 

category11 ]- 24:3 

CCR111-2 6:20 

CD 111-9:2 

__j 
Center[1)-1:17 

certify[1J- 26:7 

CFR [31 - 11 :23, 

13:16,24:9 

Chaiq4J- 2:4, 2:4, I 7:9,25:19 I 

i change [3J - 17:16, 

I 17:17, 22:5 

changes [17]- 8:15, 

8:16,11:19,12:8, 

12:9,12:11, 12:12, 

13:12, 13:25, 14:2, 

16:23, 17:11, 17:18, 

18:3, 21:14, 23:3, 

25:7 

characters 111 -

11:15 

CHERYL 111 - 26:6 

choice (31- 17:24, 

18:1, 18:2 

citation 121- 13:5, 

24:7 

clarification 111 -

16:22 . 

I clarify [1]- 14:24 

cleaning 121 - 14:15, 

21:18 

clear 111- 22:13 

close(1J- 25:18 

closing 121- 5:21, 

25:6 

I Closing 111- 25:4 

coating 121 - 14:4, 

14:22 

Code 121 - 11 :23, 

13:16 

comfortable [21 -

18:17, 18:19 

comment [31 - 5:20, 

13:1' 24:22 

comments [4]- 16:7, 

24:4, 24:15, 25:12 

Commission 111-

126:22 

complete [31 - 8:25, 

12:11, 15:6 

compliance [3J -

14:11' 24:5, 24:20 

comply [21 - 9:20, 

22:18 

complying 111-

17:10 

comports(1J- 9:18 

composite 111 - 14:6 

concurrent 111- 9:6 

conserves [21 -

10:16, 15:11 

consider[1J- 5:4 I 

consist 111 - 6:21 

consistency 111 -

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

10:24 14:10 

consults 111- 10:23 Department 1121-

contain 111- 19:11 2:11' 5:15, 6:13, 

containers £11- 13:5 11:25, 13:17, 15:18, 

continue 121 - 12:21, 17:3, 17:7, 18:4, 

22:17 18:11, 19:10,20:4 

continuous [1] - Department's (7] -

14:10 5:16, 5:18, 7:10, 12:6, 

controi[3J -7:11, 13:24, 15:9, 16:21 

14:18,24:5 describe [3J - 6:19, 

Control [15]- 4:7, 11:18,13:10 

6:13, 6:17, 6:20, 7:14, designated (1J- 5:7 

8:4, 9:12, 11:11' detail 111- 11:18 

13:11, 13:14, 16:19, develop [1] - 20:19 

19:9, 19:11, 19:22 development 111-

CONTROL 111- 1:5 6:22 

correct 111- 17:21 developments 111-

corrections 111- 14:17 

7:25 devices [1]- 24:5 

Counsel 121-2:12, difficult 111-21:2 

25:9 DILLINGHAM !81 -

counsel 121-26:13, 2:4, 18:1,21:12, 

26:16 21:23, 22:4, 23:15, 

COUNTY 111- 26:3 24:25, 25:20 

created 121-21:18, DIRECT 111- 6:6 

24:20 Direct 121- 3:5, 4:11 

creating 111- 24:18 direct [4J- 12:24, 

Cross 121- 3:7, 5:16 13:4, 15:2, 24:23 

CROSS [1]-16:8 Discussion 111-

Cross- 22:11 

examinations 111- disputes 121 - 10:21, 

5:16 15:13 

curious [1]- 23:17 Division [3] - 10:1, 

current 111 - 10:13 10:11, 10:23 

documents 121 -

D 25:12 

DOLORES 111- 2:5 

down [2]- 8:7, 23:16 

Dallas 111- 21 :4 Drive 111- 2:13 

date [9J- 8:15, 8:16, dry[2J -14:15,21:18 

8:17,17:11,17:16, due 111- 12:25 

17:17, 18:3,23:3, duly [31- 6:4, 20:10, 

24:12 26:9 

dates 121 - 12:20, during [41 - 12:8, 

17:3 12:14, 14:1, 15:6 

dealing 111- 18:24 duties 111- 6:21 

decision 111- 12:16 dying 111- 14:23 

define 111 - 11:4 

degree [21 - 6:25, E 16:16 

delegated [6J - 8:6, 

8:11, 10:7, 10:9, 18:5, e)(ii 111- 24:11 

18:12 I education 111- 16:13 

delegating 111- 10:9 educational 111-

delegation (BJ- 10:3, i 6:24 

10:11' 12:7, 13:24, effect [21 - 9:23, 

15:9, 20:17, 21:5, 17:18 

22:14 effective[1J -12:19 

deleted [11 - 7:22 effectively [51 -

15:13, 15:21 

effects [1]-14:8 

Examination 121-

3:5,3:7 

EIB 161- 1:3, 5:4, 5:6, examination [1J11:20, 13:13, 17:1 5:25 

eight111 -12:8 EXAMINATION 121 -

either 121 - 20:2, 23:2 6:6, 16:8 

elect 111 - 18:3 

elsewhere 111-

20:24 

examinations [1J5:16 

examined 111 - 6:5 

emission [6J - 9: 13, example 121 - 14:2, 

14:9, 14:11,23:23 14:21 

24:2, 24:18 examples [4] -

EMISSION 111- 1 :4 11:19,12:10,13:11, 

Emission (51 - 4: 4, 15:4 

7:12, 8:2, 11:1 0, 

11:20 

emissions 111-

14:14 

emit 111- 14:7 

excluded [21- 12:22, 

18:25 

excludes 111- 12:17 

Exhibit [7] - 7:20, 

7:21' 8:15, 8:25, 

employed [51 - 6: 11, 12:12, 15:7,23:21 

6:12, 16:19, 26:13 

26:16 

Exhibits 121 - 16:3, 

25:16 

employee 111- 2 6:15 exhibits 121 - 7:7, 

employment 111 15:24 

6:20 existing 111- 14:15 

enables 121 - 17: 6, expertise [5J -16:12, 

17:7 19:7,20:18,20:19, 

enclosure 111- 2 4:6 21:3 

enforce 121 - 15:2 1, Expires 121- 26:20, 

22:14 26:22 

enforced [31 - 1 0: 18, explain [1]-10:4 

23:2, 23:4 

enforcement [3] 

17:8, 18:16,21:6 

ensure [3] - 10:2 4, 

15:17 

ensures 111- 10:1 

entitled 111- 1:15 

Environment [6] 

2:11,6:12, 15:18, 

16:20, 18:4,19:10 

environmental 11 1 -

7:1 

ENVIRONMENT AL 

[1]- 1:1 

Environmental r 3]-

1 :16, 2:3, 8:1 

EPAr2o]- 8:2, 8:6 

8:11' 10:3, 10:7, 

10:14, 10:23, 12:3, 

12:7, 13:21, 13:25, 

14:13, 14:16, 14:2 4, 

15:10, 18:15, 21 :4, 

22:16, 23:4, 24:3 

equipped 111 - 24: 6 

Espanola 111- 21: 17 

4 

explained 111- 25:8 

explanation [2] -

18:23, 18:25 

F 

fabrics [1]- 14:23 

facilities 121 - 14:15, 

22:16 

fact 111 - 22:8 

familiar [2] - 7:3, 

19:8 

Fe[2J-2:10, 2:14 

February [11 - 4:16 

federal [271 - 8:2, 

8:17, 9:16, 9:17, 9:21, 

10:2, 10:13, 10:16, 

10:17, 12:1' 12:6, 

13:19, 13:23, 15:8, 

15:11, 15:12, 15:19, 

17:5, 17:8, 17:19, 

18:13, 18:15,22:18, 

23:4, 23:9, 23:11' 

24:7 

Federal [8]- 4:10, essence[1J -18:1 

establish 111- 14: 9 18:19,8:21,8:24,9:1, 

2 

evidence 121 - 16: 

demonstrate [11- 10:17,10:22, 15:12, 25:17 

4. I 1 ~ :23, 13:16, 15:5 __l_ .ew[2J -12:10, 15~ 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
fiber [1J - 14:25 

final [10J- 12:13, 

12:25, 13:4, 14:13, 

14:22, 15:2. 23:22. 

24:15, 24:23, 24:24 

financially [1J26:16 

fine [1J- 21:9 

first [4J - 6:4, 11:20, 

13:13, 14:3 

First[1J -12:13 

flexibility [3J - 22:21, 

22:23,23:1 

follows [21 - 5:12, 

6:5 

FOR [21 - 1 :4, 1 :6 

force [1J- 22:16 

forced [11- 22:16 

foregoing [2]- 26:7, 

26:8 

forth [21 - 11 :22, 

13:15 

Francis [11- 2:13 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

HAROLD [1J- 2:6 

Harold [1J- 2:13 

hatr11 -19:13 

hazardous [6J- 8:5, 

9:14, 11:12, 13:20, 

14:7,24:2 

HAZARDOUS [2J -

1:5, 1:6 

Hazardous [7]- 4:5, 

4:9, 7:13, 7:15, 8:3, 

11:10,11:21 

Health [1J- 13:7 

health [2J - 14:8, 

14:9 

healthy [1J- 15:22 

heaq11- 11:4 

heard [2J - 16:24, 

22:20 

Hearing [13]- 5:7, 

5:24, 7:9, 11:7' 11:9, 

15:23, 16:5, 18:21' 

19:5, 20:3, 21:9, 

21:10,25:5 

1:16,2:3 Letter[2J-4:13,4:16 meeting[1]-5:10 

IN [1]- 1:4 level [3]- 10:22, member [11- 5:7 

in-house [1]- 21:3 15:14, 23:9 members [1]- 7:9 

include [2J - 14:25, License [11- 26:20 Memoriai[1J- 2:9 

19:14 limit[1J-14:14 mercury[2]-9:7, 

included [2]- 9:1, limitation [1]- 9:18 22:23 

24:12 limitationS[1J MEXIC0[2]-1:1, 

incorporatet4J- 14:11 26:1 

7:25, 12:1, 13:18, limiting[1J -19:12 Mexic0[26J -1:16, 

17:4 limits[1J -19:2 1:18,2:10,2:11,2:14, 

incorporated (2]- List [1J- 4:10 6:12, 7:1, 7:2, 8:6, 

7:6,8:18 list[3J- 8:24, 12:11, 8:11,9:7,9:12, 10:7, 

incorporation [5J- 15:6 10:9, 10:15, 10:20, 

12:5, 12:18, 13:23, listed[1J -15:24 12:15, 15:17, 15:18, 

15:8, 24:13 literally [1J- 22:8 15:22, 16:20, 17:20, 

initiai[1J-14:10 lookt1J-19:20 19:15,22:14,23:2 

inspect [1J- 10:20 looked r

21 _ 20:16, might [2]- 20:5, 22:9 

integrated [1J- 20:21 minute [11- 21 :24 

16:17 lookst4J-17:15, most[1J-8:16 

intend [1]- 14:24 23:25, 24:3, 24:17 move [11- 15:24 

intent [1] - 15:25 MR [59]- 5:1, 5:24, 

interested [1]- 26:17 M 6:2, 6:7, 8:7, 8:10, 

hearing[11J -1:15, 

5:2, 5:3, 5:11' 7:4, 

f-----------1 16:11,16:25,18:7, 

G 

introductory [1]- I ---1 9:8, 10:25, 11:3, 11:6, 

24:10 11:8, 11:14, 11:16, 

issuet1J -10:19 machine[1J- 26:10 11:17, 15:23, 16:1, 

issues[1J- 5:22 MACTt19l- 8:5 16:5, 16:10, 16:14, 

Gay [1J - 25:2 

GAYt1J- 2:4 

General [31 - 2:8, 

2:8, 2:12 

generally [11 - 23:18 

Gertr21- 4:14, 4:17 

given [1]- 26:12 

Gonzales [11- 1:18 

government [11-

17:19 

GRANTHAM [10]-

2:12, 5:24, 6:7, 9:8, 

11:17, 15:23, 16:5, 

17:13, 20:3, 25:5 

Grantham [1]- 3:6 

Green [1J - 5:6 

GREEN [231 - 2:5, 

5:1,6:2,8:7, 10:25, 

11:14, 16:1, 16:10, 

17:14, 17:23, 17:25, 

18:17, 18:22, 20:7, 

20:11,21:8,21:11, 

23:6, 23:13, 25:3, 

25:9, 25:15, 25:18 

Gregory [1J - 5:6 

GREGORYr11- 2:5 

group [11 - 19:6 

H 

22:21,23:16 

hereby [1J - 26:7 

hereto [1J- 26:16 

Herrera[1J -10:25 

HERRERA [5J - 2:5, 

11:4, 11:7, 17:24, 

25:2 

higher [1J- 20:24 

Highlands [1] - 7:2 

highly[1]- 21:1 

hour [1 J - 1: 1 9 

house [1]- 21:3 

housekeeping [4J -

22:9. 25:9, 25:10 

hurry[1J- 17:15 

1Tt1J-1:14 8:12,8:21, 10:1, 17:13, 17:14, 17:22, 

itself[1J- 22:3 10:10, 10:13, 10:15, 17:23, 17:25, 18:2, 

,----------------1 10:21,11:5,11:11, 18:17,18:21,18:22, 

13:11, 13:14, 13:19, 18:23, 19:1. 19:5, 

I 

I 

J 

Jamesr11 -16:17 

January [1]- 4:13 

jobs [11- 20:24 

j Joyce [21- 4:13, 4:16 

I July[1J- 10:10 

I 

jurisdiction [21 -

8:13, 22:14 

I K 

-113:25, 14:2, 14:3, 19:8, 19:13,19:16, 

115:17, 18:6, 18:9 19:17,19:18, 19:22, 

I 

MACTs !21 - 9:9, 9:24 19:25, 20:2, 20:3, 

Madam [1]- 7:9 20:7, 20:11, 21:8, 

Madison [1J- 16:17 21:9, 21:11, 21:20, 

I management [1]- 21:22, 21:24, 21 :25, 

1

7:1 22:2, 23:6, 23:13, 

Manager [1J - 20:15 23:20, 25:3, 25:5, 

managert1J-16:19 25:9,25:10,25:15, 

manufacturing [1]- 25:18 

14:25 

March [11 - 10:8 

marked [2J - 16:3, 

KATHI !11- 2:4 25:

16 

keep !11 - 15:22 MARKED/ 

identification [2]- kind l

1l- 23:

16 ADMITTED [1]- 4:2 

16 4 25 17 kinds [1]- 23:1 

MS [15J - 11:4, 11:7, 

17:24, 18:1, 20:9, 

20:13,21:12,21:23, 

22:4. 22:12, 23:10, 

23:15, 24:25, 25:2, 

25:20 

: , : material [41 - 7:6, 

implement[7J- 8:12, 1-----------1 7:22, 13:6 

10:2,10:8,10:10, L MATTER[1]-1:4 

10:15, 15:19, 15:21 matter[5J -1:15,5:8, 

implementation [21 - labeling [

11 _ 13:

5 7:3, 16:25, 22:9 

10:16, 15:11 language [

41 _ 17:

11 , I Maximum [61 - 4:6, 

implemented[2J- 19:

2, 19:

11 , 19:19 7:13,8:4,11:11, 

10:17, 15:13 Lasr11 _7:

2 13:10, 13:13 

impose[1J-15:1 last[11 _16:

14 MAXIMUM[1]-1:5 

Multi[1J- 1:17 

Multi-Service [1J -

1:17 

must [21 - 9:20, 

10:12 

N 

improvement[1J- mean [3]- 18:14, name !7J- 5:6, 6:8, latest[1J-18:12 610 1611 1614 f-------------1 22:8 19 14 22 4 : ' : . : ' 

least[1]-9:15 : ' : 20:14 

h IMPROVEMENTt1J- left[31 _18_. 18, Medina[2]-4:14, andle[1J-21:6 1:

1 4

:

17 National[3]-8:2, 

3 

hang[1]-19•13 18:20,20:23 c1·9 11•20 

'---------· ___ L___'m_p_r_ov---:e----:-m-:-e=n:-:-t--:::[2J----:---=c~:-:-:-~--=-=::-::-:-=--=-=:-:-:-=-==-=.l,--M---=e--=et=-in--:-:g=-[=1J----=-,-1-: 1 __ 7____ · ' __ · _____ _ --- leSS[1]-21:14 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 
national 121- 10:24, 

23:23 

nature 111-6:19 

necessarily 111-

22:6 

need 111- 19:13 

NESHAP [241 - 8:3, 

8:12,8:19, 9:25, 10:8, 

10:13, 10:15, 10:21, 

11:5, 11:6, 11:9, 

11:18,11:21,11:22, 

12:2, 12:8, 12:9, 

12:15, 12:16, 15:17, 

18:6, 18:9, 23:21, 

24:11 

NESHAPs [BJ - 9:9, 

9:24, 19:15, 19:23, 

20:17,21:7,21:21, 

21:22 

never 121 - 20:25 

new 1121 - 7:25, 9:9, 

9:24, 9:25, 14:3, 

14:15, 14:17, 15:16, 

16:11, 21:25, 24:5 

NEW[2]-1:1,26:1 

New [29]- 1:16, 1:18, 

2:10,2:11,2:14,6:12, 

7:1, 7:2, 7:21, 8:6, 

8:11,9:4,9:6,9:12, 

10:7, 10:9, 10:15, 

10:20, 12:15, 15:17, 

15:18, 15:22, 16:20, 

17:20,19:15,22:14, 

22:22,23:2 

nine 111- 20:21 

NMAC [BJ- 1:4, 1:5, 

4:4, 4:6, 7:12, 7:13, 

9:4,25:8 

NMED [16J- 4:3, 

7:20,7:21,8:15,8:16, 

8:25, 12:12, 12:23, 

13:3, 13:9, 14:12, 

14:20, 15:3, 15:7, 

16:3 

none 111- 16:2 

NOTARY 111-26:19 

noted 111 - 15:6 

notice [6J- 15:25, 

22:2, 23:22, 23:25, 

24:8, 24:14 

notices [6] - 4:1 0, 

8:19, 8:21, 8:24, 9:1, 

15:5 

November £61- 8:20, 

8:22, 9:22, 12:4, 

13:22,24:1 

NSPS 121- 10:13, 

18:7 

Number 111 - 26:20 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

0 partial 121 - 12:24, 

23:22 

parties 121- 26:14, 

oath(1]-5:13 26:16 

object [1] - 20:4 parties' 111- 5:19 

objections [1]- 16:1 partly 111- 21:16 

obligations 111-9:19 Parts[SJ -7:18,8:14, 

Occupational 111- 9:5, 16:23, 17:11 

13:7 parts 111 - 14:4 

OF [7]- 1:1, 1:4, 1 :6, paying [1]- 20:24 

1:12, 6:6, 26:1, 26:3 PEC[2J-14:15 

Office 121 - 2:8, 2:9 people 111- 20:23 

Officer(13J- 5:7, perchloroethylene 

5:24, 7:9, 11:7, 11:9, (1]- 14:14 

15:23, 16:5, 18:21, Performance 121 -

19:5, 20:3, 21:9, 9:4, 22:22 

21:10,25:5 performance 111-

officer[1J- 26:6 9:13 

one [6J - 12:13, 13: 1 , period [4J - 12:8, 

20:2, 22:12, 23:7, 12:14,14:1,15:6 

24:22 periodic [4J- 12:5, 

One [31- 14:4, 24:20, 13:23, 15:8, 17:2 

25:10 permit 111- 10:19 

1 

ones(2J-18:17, permits(1J- 10:19 

21:6 PERRY[1J- 4:12 

open 111- 5:3 Perry[3J- 4:15, 4:18, 

opening [3J - 5:14, 25:16 

5:23,5:25 PERRY-PIPER [1Joperation 111-21:18 4:12 

operations I7J - Perry-Piper [31 -

12:25, 14:25, 15:1, 4:15, 4:18, 25:16 

21 :13, 23:24, 24:19 I personally[1Jopinion [1J- 22:7 I 26:10 

option [1]- 24:5 personnel [31 -

optional 111- 5:23 10:18, 15:20,20:5 

Optional 121-5:14, perspective [1] -

5:21 19:4 

original 111-24:16 pertaining 121- 12:2, 

OSHA[1J- 13:8 13:19 

outreach 111- 6:23 PETERS [1]- 2:6 

--------- piece 111-25:10 

p PIPER 111-4:12 -- Piper[4J- 4:15,4:18, 

25:13, 25:16 p.m[2]-1:19, 25:21 

place 121-21:17, PAGE 111- 3:2 

22:6 panel !3J- 5:15, Planning 111- 20:14 16:6, 16:7 

plastic 121 - 14:4, paragraph 111-

14:5 24:11 

pointr21- 15:25, parallel 121 - 24:16, 

16:23 24:24 

Policy111- 20:15 Part[1BJ- 7:20, 7:21, pollutant121- 21:19, 9:4, 9:5, 10:5, 11:23, 

24:2 11:25, 12:17, 12:20, POLLUTANTS [2J - 13:16, 13:18, 16:25, 

1:5, 1:6 18:23, 21:23, 24:9 

pollutants [5J - 8:5, part [7] - 12:6, 13:24, 

9:14, 11:13, 13:20, 15:9, 19:10, 19:15, 

14:7 21:21,21:22 

Pollutants !71 - 4:5, 

4:9, 7:13, 7:16, 8:3 . 11:10, 11:21 

portion (1]- 12:1 

position [4]- 6:1 

6 

5, 

:13 

:21 

16:13, 18:4, 18:11 

Post 111 - 2:9 

potential 111- 15 

Potentiai[1J-10 

practice [21 - 1 0: 24, 

17:2 

:18 

5:22 

7 

practices 111- 14 

prefer[1]- 10:14 

prehearing [1]-

prepared 111 - 7: 

present[1]-7:10 

presently[1J- 12 

previous 111- 22 

previously [1] - 1 

printing [1]- 14: 

procedure 111- 9 

procedures 111 -

:17 

:21 

5:7 

22 

:3 

5:11 

proceed 121 - 5:2 5, 

6:2 

proceeding [21-

26:7, 26:14 

Proceedings [11 

25:21 

PROCEEDINGS 

1:12 

-

[1] -

processes 121 - 14:7, 

14:18 

production 121 -

14:6, 14:18 

products 111 - 1 

professional [1 

4:5 

J -

22:7 

promulgate 111 -

24:24 

promulgated [4 

9:21, 12:2, 12:14 

13:21 

lproposal 121 - 1 8:10, 

24:16 

proposals [21 - 24:1, 

24:17 

propose [11- 17 :3 

PROPOSED [11 

Proposed [21 - 4 

- 1:4 

:4, 

4:6 

5:4, 

:20, 

9:6, 

proposed [16]-

7:6, 7:11, 7:19, 7 

7:24, 8:14, 8:16, 

10:5, 10:6, 11:19 

12:19, 13:12. 16 :23, 

25:7 

proposing [31 -

11:25, 13:17, 17 

protection (1]-

Protection [1]-

:11 

19:6 

8:1 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 

4 

provisions [4J - 13:2, 

18:19,24:4,24:23 

Public 111- 5:20 

PUBLIC [1]- 26:19 

public [3] - 6:23, 

25:11,25:12 

publish 111- 24:1 

published [5J - 8:20, 

8:22, 15:5, 24:16, 

24:17 

purpose (41 - 7:8, 

7:19, 7:24, 14:23 

pursuant 111- 10:2 

Q 

quality [3J- 7:11, 

15:20, 19:3 

Quality [6]- 6:13, 

9:12,10:18,16:21, 

19:11,20:15 

1 questions [6]- 16:6, 

117:13,20:12,21:11, 

25:1,25:3 

quote 111 - 22:2 

R I 

radiation [1]- 19:6 

Radiation 121 - 19:9, 

19:22 

radionuclide 111-

20:17 

radio nuclides [6]-

12:15, 18:24, 19:3, 

19:12,19:14, 19:24 

really 121-20:18, 

21:2 

reasons [21 - 18:20, 

25:8 

Rebecca 121 - 4:14, 

4:17 

rebuttal 111-5:18 

received [3]- 13:1, 

24:4,24:21 

recent[1J- 8:17 

record [91 - 5:9, 6:9, 

15:25,16:11,22:11, 

25:11,25:14,25:19, 

26:11 

recorded 111-26:10 

refer 111- 7:17 

reference [10J - 7:25, 

11:22,12:1,12:18, 

13:14, 13:18, 17:4, 

17:22. 17:23, 24:13 

reflect 121- 8:16, 

10:12 

regarding 111- 10:21 
regards 111- 23:20 

Region [11- 21:4 

Register !61 - 4:10, 

8:19, 8:21' 8:24, 9:1' 

15:5 

regretr11- 19:19 

regularlY PI- 10:12 

regulate 121 - 19:3, 

19:12 

regulated 121 - 1 0:14, 

10:20 

regulating 111 -

24:18 

Regulations [2] -

11:23, 13:16 

regulations [9) -

6:22, 7:12, 9:10, 9:24, 

10:12, 12:11, 17:5, 

17:19, 17:20 

regulatory !31 - 6:21, 

10:1, 15:19 

reinforced 111- 14:5 

related 121 - 24:4, 

26:13 

relative [11 - 26:15 

REMEMBERED 111-

1:14 

request 111- 25:6 

required [31- 22:17, 

22:18 

requirements [20] -

9:16,9:18, 9:21, 10:2, 

10:13, 10:17, 12:2, 

13:6, 13:19, 14:10, 

15:1,15:12,15:20, 

22:15, 22:19, 22:22, 

22:25, 23:12, 24:21 

researched 111- 7:5 

reserving 111-24:10 

resolved [2]- 10:22, 

15:14 

resources 121 -

10:16, 15:12 

respectfully [11 -

25:6 

respectively 111-

7:18 

responsibility 121 -

17:7,21:1 

responsible 111 -

18:15 

revieW[3J -10:19, 

12:10, 24:15 

reviewed [2]- 12:12, 

14:16 

I revise 121- 9:4, 17:3 I 

I revised 111 - 22:1 I revising 111- 14:13 

I revisions [10J- 5:4, 

II 6:21, 7:7, 7:19, 7:21, 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

7:24, 8:1,9:6, 10:5, similar 111 - 16:24 State [31- 10:15, 

10:6 simply 111 - 25:6 15:11' 23:2 

REVISIONS 111- 1:4 simultaneously 111 - statement 121 - 5:25, 

Rita (41 - 20:6, 20:7, 9:3 25:6 

20:11' 20:14 site[1J- 21:18 statements [41 -

RITA 111-20:10 skies 111 - 15:22 5:14,5:21,5:23,25:4 

Road[1]-1:18 Slow [11- 8:7 statute [21 - 19:2, 

ROBERT [31 - 3:4, small 111-21:17 19:20 

6:3, 6:6 SOREN [11 - 2:6 statutory [21- 9:18, 

Robert !31 - 3:5, sorry[?]- 8:7, 8:10, 19:19 

4:11,6:10 11 :3, 11 :6, 11 :8, step 111- 23:7 

Room [1]- 1:17 11:16, 21:20 still 121 - 22:15, 23:14 

routinely [11- 10:23 Source [41- 4:8, STILLERS [11-

rule[12J- 9:7, 12:13, 7:15, 9:4, 22:22 19:17 

12:25, 13:4, 14:13, SOURCE 111- 1:6 stipulate 111- 16:12 

14:17, 14:22, 15:2, source [41 - 8:5, Strategies [41 - 6:13, 

21 :25, 23:23, 24:23, 11:12, 13:20,24:3 6:17,6:20, 16:20 

24:24 sources [61 - 6:22, strengthening 111-

rules 1121- 7:17, 8:13, 9:20, 10:14, 23:18 

7:25,8:17,8:18, 12:2, 10:20 strike 111- 7:23 

14:3, 14:9, 15:15, Southwest [1)- 1:18 strike-out [1 J - 7:23 

17:4, 22:19, 22:25, specific 111- 23:21 stringency 111-

24:7 spill 111 - 21 :17 17:10 

Runnels 111- 2:13 Spiller [1J- 10:25 stringent[7]- 9:15, 

SPILLERS [12]- 3:4, 14:19,21:15,22:5, 

s 6:3, 6:6, 8:10, 11 :3, 23:9, 23:11 

11:6,11:8,11:16, subject 111- 7:3 

S-P-1-L-L-E-R-S 111 - 20:2, 21:22, 21 :24, submitted 111-25:12 

6:10 

22:2 Subparts 121- 12:18, 

Safety111- 13:7 Spillers [6J- 3:5, 12:21 

4:11,6:8,6:10, 11:17, subparts 111- 12:20 

Santar21- 2:10,2:14 17:6 Subsection 111 - science [41- 6:25, SS(1]- 26:2 12:17 

7:1, 16:16, 16:17 St111- 2:13 subsequent (2) - Second 121- 12:24, staffpJ- 20:18 24:15,24:23 14:13 stand 111- 20:7 substantial [1]- second [1]- 14:5 

standard 121 - 9:3, 17:18 

Secretaryr11- 2:5 24:2 substantive [21 - section [1]- 18:24 Standard [11- 22:23 9:19, 12:9 

Section [6J - 6:14, standards [26] - 8:4, summary(1J- 22:10 

6:18,6:20,9:11, 9:13,9:14, 11:12, Superfund [1]- 16:20, 20:15 12:6, 13:14, 13:15, 21:18 

Seeing 111- 16:2 13:19, 13:24, 14:9, surface [11- 14:4 

September [5J - 14:14, 14:16, 14:19, sworn [4] - 6:4, 20:8, 6:18, 8:20, 8:22, 12:3, 15:8,15:17, 15:21, 20:10,26:9 13:21 17:8, 18:5, 18:6, 18:7, synthetic 111- 14:25 

serious 111-21:19 18:10, 18:13,18:16, Service[1J- 1:17 23:23,24:18 T set (31 - 8:25, 11 :22, Standards [SJ - 4:5, 

13:15 4:8, 7:12, 7:15, 8:3, 

setting 111- 14:19 9:5, 11:10, 11:21 tanks 121 - 24:6, 

several 121 - 20:16, STANDARDS 121 - 24:21 

20:19 1:4, 1:6 technical 121- 8:8, 

shall 111- 9:14 started [5]- 5:1, 5:2, 21:1 

SHANDLER 121- 2:7, 20:19,20:20, 20:21 I technologies [1J25:10 

1 

statecsr- 6:8, 8:18, 14:18 

shorthand 111- 9:10, 10:22, 15:14, Technology[7]- 4:7, 

26:10 16:11' 17:4, 17:9, 7:14, 8:4, 11:11' 

shown !41- 7:20, 18:4 13:11, 13:14 

7:21' 7:22, 7:23 STATE!2J -1:1,26:1 technology(1]-

I 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 

5 

16:17 

TECHNOLOGY [11-

1:6 

test [11- 10:19 

testified 121- 6:5, 

17:6 

testify 111- 5:15 

testimony[5J- 7:7, 

16:24, 26:8, 26:10, 

26:11 

Testimony (2) - 4:11, 

5:13 

textr11- 24:10 

textiles 111 - 14:23 

THE 121 - 1:4, 16:9 

Therefore [11 - 12:19 

third 111- 14:21 

Third 111 - 13:4 

Title £21 - 11 :22, 

13:15 

TOp]-1:4 

today [41 - 7:8, 

16:25,18:8, 18:11 

today's £11- 7:7 

took 121- 20:25, 

21:17 

trained 121 - 20:23, 

20:24 

TRANSCRIPT 111-

1:12 

transcript 121 - 26:9, 

26:11 

true [11 - 26:11 

TRUJILLO !51 - 20:9, 

20:10, 20:13, 22:12, 

23:10 

Trujillo[2]- 20:14, 

21:10 

TSO !71 - 2:6, 18:21, 

18:23, 19:5, 19:13, 

19:22, 21:9 

Tso 121- 18:22, 21 :8 

Tso's 111-20:11 

turn 111-25:19 

two [4]- 14:3, 24:1, 

24:17,25:11 

type 121- 8:9, 12:10 

f--------------1 

u I 

1 Under111- 10:11 

under 111- 5:13 

underlined 111 - 7:22 

University [21 - 7:2, 

16:18 

unlesspr- 16:6 

unregulated 111- I 

6:23 

Up[2]- 21:17,23:16 
update [1]- 10:12 

usual 111- 5:11 

v 

various 111- 6:22 

Vegas 111 - 7:2 

Vice(1]- 2:4 

viewed 111- 15:7 

f __ w __ 

I 

waste (51 - 12:25, 

13:6, 21:13, 23:23, 

24:19 

I weakening [1]-

1 23:18 

withdrawal 121 -

12:24, 23:22 

withdrawing [41 -

24:9, 24:10, 24:22 

witness 121- 6:1, 

20:6 

WITNESSES 111- 3:3 

' witnesses (6] - 5:15, 

5:17, 5:19, 25:8, 26:8, 

26:12 

words 121 - 8:8, 

12:21 

y 

j 

I l years 121- 20:20, 

I 20:21 

i 

z 

ZACH 111- 2:7 

I 

I 

EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07 

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

505-243-5018 

6 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony NMAC 

Revisions Parts 78 and 82 
IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO: 

20.2.78 NMAC- EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 

HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.82 NMAC- MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL 

TECHNOLOGYSTANDARDSFORSOURCE 

CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION'S 

NOTICE OF INTENT TO PRESENT TECHNICAL TESTIMONY 

Pursuant to 20.1.1.302.A NMAC, the New Mexico Environment Department 0'-JMED) 

Environmental Protection Division ("the Division") hereby submits its Notice of Intent to present 

technical testimony in this proceeding. 

1. Person Represented By The Technical Witnesses. 

The New Mexico Environment Department, Environmental Protection Division. 

2. Name And Qualifications Of Each Technical Witness. 

Robert Spillers. Mr. Spillers is an Environmental Analyst for the Control Strategies 

Section ofthe Air Quality Bureau. He has worked in the Air Quality Bureau since September 

2005. Mr. Spillers holds a B.S. degree in Environmental Science and Management from New 

Mexico Highlands University. 

Andy Berger. Mr. Berger is Control Strategies Manager at the Air Quality Bureau. He 

has worked at the Air Quality Bureau since March 2002. Mr. Berger holds a B.S. degree in 

Integrated Science and Technology from James Madison University. 

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE I 
,,. 

3. Summary Of Testimony And Anticipated Length Of Testimony 

The witnesses will testify in support of adoption of the revisions for the following 

reasons: The proposed revisions incorporate by reference the National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) between September 2, 2001 and November 30, 2006; and Maximum Achievable 

Control Technology (MACT) Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 

promulgated by the EPA between September 1, 2002 and November 30, 2006. The Division 

periodically petitions the Environmental Improvement Board to update the state's regulations to 

incorporate these federal requirements, in order to ensure that the Division has the regulatory 

authority to to implement the most recent requirements. The proposed revisions include new 

MACTs and amendments to existing NESHA.Ps and MACTs adopted by EPA during the time 

periods stated above. 

Mr. Spillers' written testimony is submitted as Exhibit NMED 4. His oral direct 

testimony is anticipated to take 30 minutes. Mr. Berger's direct testimony is anticipated to take 

10 minutes. 

4. Text of Recommended Modifications to the Proposed Regulatory Change 

The Division does not recommend any modifications to the proposed regulatory changes 

submitted in the Petition of December 14, 2006. (Pleading Log at I). 

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE 2 
5. List and Description of Exhibits 

The Division submits the following exhibits: 

EXHIBIT NUMBER TITLE OF EXHIBIT 

NMED 1 Proposed 20.2. 78 NMAC -Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

NMED 2 Proposed 20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

NMED 3 List of Federal Register Notices 

NMED 4 Written Testimony of Robert Spillers 

A complete set of the federal notices identified in Exhibit NMED 3 is included on CD, is 

. available for review at the Air Quality Bureau's Santa Fe office and will be made available for 

review at the public hearing. 

6. Case Record File. 

The case record file in this proceeding is part ofthe administrative record and consists of 

the following: 

• "Petition for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Regulatory Revisions" filed by the 

Division on December 15," 2006. 

• Notice ofDocketing, issued December 18,2006. 

• Affidavit of Publication (New Mexic Register), filed February 6, 2007 . 

• Affidavit of Publication (Albuquerque Journal), filed February 9, 2007 . 

• Public comment ofR. Perry-Piper, January 29, 2007 

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE 3 
7. Reservation of Rights 

This Notice of Intent to Present Technical Testimony is based on the Division's petition. 

The Division reserves the right to call any perSon to testify and to present any exhibit in response 

to another notice of intent or public comment filed in this matter or to any testimony or exhibit 

offered at the public hearing. The Division also reserves the right to call any person as a rebuttal 

witness and to present any exhibit in support thereof. 

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE 4 

Respectfully submitted, 

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL 

~~~ Bill Grantham 

Assistant General Counsel 

New Mexico Environment Department 

1190 St. Francis Drive 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502-6110 

Telephone (505) 827-2824 

Facsimile (505) 827-1628 
EXHIBIT 

J HMt:D 1 

TITLE20 

CHAPTER2 

PART78 

EXHIBIT NMED 1 

F.NVrn.ONMENT AL PROTECTION 

AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) 

EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.78.1 ISSUJNG AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. 

[06116/95; 20.2.78.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.l00 06/23/00] 

20.2. 78.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants which are su~ject to the requirements of 40 

CFR Part 61, as amended through( September I, 200 I] November 30, 2006. 

(06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02;.A. 

OXIXX/07] 

20.2.78.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: The environmental improvement board "sha11 promulgate 

regulations and standards in ... air quality management'' (NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-8.A) and "regulations adopted 

by the environmental improvement board ... may ... prescribe standards of performance for sources and emissions 

standards for hazardous air pollutants ... " (NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5.C). 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.102 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.4 DURATION: Permanent. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.103 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995, except where a later date is cited at the end of a section or 

paragraph. 

[06/16/95, 08/02/96; 20.2.78.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.104 06/23/00] 

[The latest effective date of any section in this part is February 18, 2002] 

20.2.78.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective of Part 78 of Chapter 2 is to adopt or establish state authority to 

implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants in New Mexico subject to 40 CFR Part 61. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.105 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.7 DEFJNITIONS: [RESERVED] 

[20.2.78.7 NMAC- N, 06/23/00] 

20.2.78.8 AMENDMENT AND SUPERSESSION OF PRIOR REGULATIONS: This part amends and 

supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 75 I, last filed on April 10, 1994. All references to AQCR 751 

in any other rule shall be understood as a reference to this part. 

[06116/95; 20.2.78.8 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.106 06/23/00] 

20.2. 78.9 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 61: Except as otherwise provided, the national emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR 

Part 61, as amended in the Federal Register through [September I. 200 I] November 30, 2006 are hereby 

incorporated into this part (20.2.78 NMAC]. 

[06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11119/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.78.107 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02;.A. 

OXIXX/07] 

20.2. 78.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made 

to the incorporated federal standards: 

A. amend 40 CFR Part 61, Section 61.02, Definitions, as follows: For the purposes of delegation of 

authority which the Administrator of the United States environmental protection agency may, in his discretion, 

20.2.78 NMAC February 18, 2002 XXJXX/07 
delegate to the secretary of the New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary or his 

authorized representative. 

B. exclude 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts B (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from 

Underground Uranium Mines), H (National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides Other Than Radon 

from Department of Energy Facilities), I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Facilities 

Licensed by the NRC and Federal Facilities not covered by Subpart H), K (National Emission Standard for 

Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants), Q (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions 

from Department of Energy Facilities), R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum 

Stacks), T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings), and W 

(National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings). 

C. the federal emission standards incorporated by this regulation shall not be subject to NMSA 1978, 

Section 74-2-8 (Variances] 

[06116/95; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.108 06/23/00] 

20.2. 78.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this part may be viewed at the New 

Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, NM 87502. 

[06/16/95; 20.2.78.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.109 06/23/00] 

IDSTORY OF 20.2. 78 NMAC: 

Pre-NMAC History: The material in this part was derived from that previously filed with the Commission of 

Public Records-State Records Center and Archives. 

Effi/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 07/24/84. 

Effi/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 08/18/87. 

Effi/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 07/07/88. 

Effi/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 04127/89. 

Effi/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 05/29/90. 

Effi/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 04122/91. 

Effi/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 04/14/92. 

Effi/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 04/21193. 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 04/12/94. 

History of Repealed Material: [RESERVED] 

Other History: 

EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 - Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 

04/12194 was renumbered into first version of the New Mexico Administrative Code as 20 NMAC 2.78, Emission 

Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 05/17/95. 

20 NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, filed 05/17/95, was renumbered, reformatted, 

amended and replaced by 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00. 

20.2.78 NMAC February 18,2002 XXJXXJ07 2 
EXHIBIT NMED 2 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) 

EXHIBIT 

TITLE20 

CHAPTER2 

PART82 MAXIMUM ACIDEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE 

CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.82.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.1 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, which are subject to the requirements of 

40 CFR Part 63, as amended through [September I, 2902)November 30, 2006. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 08114/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06/23/00; 

A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03: A. OXIXX/07] 

20.2.82.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: Environmental Improvement Act, NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8 

(A) (4) and (7), and Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 74-2-1 et seq., including specifically, Section 

74-2-5 (A), (B) and (C). Section 74-2-5 (C) provides that "regulations adopted by the environmental improvement 

board may prescribe standards of performance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants ... " 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 08114/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.102 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.4 DURATION: Permanent. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.4, 08/l4/98; 20.2.82.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 1994, except where a later date is cited at the end of a 

section or paragraph. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.5, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06/23/00] 

[The latest effective date of any section in this part is June 13, 2003] 

20.2.82.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective of this part is to adopt or establish state authority to implement 

emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for the source categories in New Mexico subject to federal standards. 

The US EPA requires New Mexico to adopt such standards in order to implement requirements in Section 112 of the 

Clean Air Act. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.6, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.105 06/23/00] 

20.2.82. 7 DEFINITIONS: [Reserved] 

[20.2.82.7 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.1 0 NMAC 

(below), the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for source categories as promulgated by the US 

EPA, 40 CFR Part 63, as amended in the Federal Register through [September I, 2092] November 30. 2006 are 

hereby incorporated into this part [20.2.82 NMAC]. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/l4/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06/23/00; 

A, 02/l8/02; A, 06/13/03; A, OXIXX/07] 

20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECT TO 40 CFR 63.40-63.44 OF SUBPART B (Constructed and 

Reconstructed Major Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutants): The owner or operator of a source subject to these 

provisions, that will be constructing or reconstructing after June 29, 1999, shall not construct or reconstruct unless: 

A. the source has received a maximum achievable control technology (MACT) determination and 

approval from the department under this part; and 

B. the MACT determination and approval has been incorporated into a permit under 20.2. 72 NMAC -

Construction Permits or 20.2. 70 NMAC - Operating Permits. 

[08/l4/98; 20.2.82.9 NMAC - Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82. 108 06/23/00] 

20.2.82 NMAC June 13,2003 XX!XX/07 
20.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made 

to the incorporated federal standards: 

A. general provisions: Amend 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A- General Provisions, Section 63.2, 

Definitions, as follows: For the pwposes of delegation of authority which the Administrator of the US EPA may, in 

his or her discretion, delegate to the secretary of the New Mexico environment department, "administrator'' means 

the secretary or his/her authorized representative. 

B. variances: The federal emission standards incorporated by this Part shall not be subject to NMSA 

1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances). 

C. constructed and reconstructed major sources: The effective date for incorporation of 40 CFR 

63.40- 63.44 of Subpart B under 20.2.82.8 NMAC shall be June 29, 1999. 

[Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.10 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.109 06/23/00] 

20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this Part may be viewed at the New 

Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, NM 87502. 

[08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.110 06/23/00] 

HISTORY OF 20.2.82 NMAC: 

Pre-NMAC History: None. 

History of Repealed Material: [RESERVED] 

Other History: 

20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air 

Pollutants, filed 10/28/94. 

20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air 

Pollutants, filed 10/28/94 was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by 20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories Of Hazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00. 

20.2.82 NMAC Jl!fle 13,2003 XXIXX/07 2 
EXHIBIT 

m 

a IYMeo3 

Exhibit NMED 3 

Update of 40 CFR Part 61 

Exhibit Date Federal Register Source Catl!Q"ory 

3.1* 9/9/01 67 FR 57159 National Emission Standards for Emissions of Radionuclides 

Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities; 

National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions 

from Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H; Final 

Amendment 

3.2* 6/47/04 69 FR33865 National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides 

Other Than Radon From Department of Energy Facilities; 

National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions 

From Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H; Final 

Amendment-Correction 

3.3 2/6/03 68 FR6082 National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations 

3.4 12/4/03 68 FR67932 National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations 

3.5 9/18/03 68 FR 54790 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Asbestos 

3.6 7/20/04 69 FR43322 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Asbestos 

3.7 12/11/03 68 FR 69036 Delegation of Authority to New Mexico 

3.8 12/9/05 70 FR 73138 Delegation of Authority to AlbuquerqueBernalillo County Air Quality Control Board 

*Not included in the incorporation by reference. 

Update of 40 CFR Part 63 

Date Federal Register Source Cate.,ory 

3.9 9/20/02 67 FR59336 Pesticide Active Ingredient Production 

3.10 9/24/02 67 FR 59787 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.11 1118/02 67 FR 68038 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.12 12/30/02 67 FR 79808 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.13 9/3/04 69 FR53980 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.14 I 0/1/04 69 FR 58837 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.15 10/3/05 70 FR57513 Secondary Aluminum Production 

3.16 9/20/02 67FR 59433 Bulk Gasoline Terminals and National 

Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk 

Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 

3.17 9/30/02 67 FR 61380 Bulk Gasoline Terminals and National 

Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk 

Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 

3.18 8/10/05 70 FR46452 Bulk Gasoline Terminals and National 

Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk 

Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 

3.19 12/19/03 68 FR 70960 Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline 

Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 

3.20 4/6/06 71 FR 17352 Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and 

NMED 3- PAGE 1 
! Pipeline Breakout Stations) I 

3.21 10/18/02 67 FR64498 Friction Materials Manufacturing Facilities 

322 10/21102 67FR64742 Publicly Owned Trea1ment Works 

3.23 12/4/02 67 FR 72330 P~ and Other Web Coating 

1 3.24 12/6/02 67FR 72580 Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry 

3.25 7/18/06 71 FR40679 Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry 

• 3.26 12/19/02 67 FR 77828 Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products 

3.27 4/19/04 69 FR20968 Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products 

3.28 12/19/02 67FR 77830 Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

3.29 • 6/15/04 69FR33474 Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

3.30 6/12/06 71 FR33804 Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines and National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (PR) 

3.3 I 6126106 71 FR36394 Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines and National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air PoJlutants for 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

3.32 7127/06 71 FR42622 Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines and 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

3.33 1/16/03 68 FR2227 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 

3.34 9/8/06 71 FR53272 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills and National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid 

Waste Landfills (PR) 

3.35 2110/03 68 FR6635 Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

3.36 5/6/03 68FR23898 Source Categories 

3.37 6/2/04 69 FR31008 Source Categories 

3.38 711/04 69 FR39862 Source Categories 

3.39 6/23/06 71 FR36014 Source Categories 

3.40 8/9/06 71 FR45487 Source Categories 

3.41 3/12/03 68 FR 11745 Rubber Tire Manufacturing 

3.42 3/17/03 68 FR 12590 Surface Coating of Metal Coil 

3.43 4/14/03 68 FR 18062 Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations 

3.44 4/14/03 68 FR 18008 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 

3.45 4122/06 68 FR 19885 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 

3.46 10/13/04 69FR60813 1 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 

3.47 1110/05 70 FR 1670 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 

3.48 4115/05 70 FR 19992 Coke Oven Batteries 

3.49 812/05 70FR44285 Coke Ovens: Pushing._ Quenching, and Battery Stacks 

3.50 4/16/03 68 FR 18730 Refractory Products Manufacturing 

3.51 2/13/06 71 FR 7415 Refractory Products Manufacturing 

3.52 4114/06 71 FR 19435 Refractory Products Manufacturing 

3.53 4/17/03 68 FR 19076 Hydrochloric Acid Production 

3.54 4nt06 71 FR 17738 Hydrochloric Acid Prodnction 

3.55 4/21/03 68 FR 19375 Reinforced Plastic Composites Production 

3.56 8/25/05 70 FR50118 Reinforced Plastic Composites Production 

3.57 4129/03 68FR22976 Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing, 

3.58 5nt03 68FR24562 Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing 

3.59 5/17/05 70FR28360 Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing 

3.60 5/8/03 68FR24653 Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, 

Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pull!_ Mills( 1} 

3.61 7/18/03 68FR42603 Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, 

Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills 

3.62 12/5/03 168 FR67953 Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, 

Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills 

NMED3 PAGE2 
3.63 5/6/04 69 FR2532l I Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, 

Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills 

3.64 5/16/03 68 FR26690 Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and ! 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for . 

Clay Ceramics Manufacturing I 

3.65 5/28/03 68 FR31744 Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and I 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for ! 

Clay Ceramics Manufacturing(2) 

3.66 5120/03 6& FR27646 Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing I 

3.67 7113/060 ~ FR 39579 Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities 

3.68 5/22/03 68 FR 27913 Semiconductor Manufacturing 

3.69 10/19/06 FR61701 Semiconduct()r Manufacturing 

3.70 68 FR28606 Surface Coating of Metal Furniture 

3.71 5127/03 68 FR28774 1 Engine Test Cells/Stands 

3.72 8/28/03 68 FR 51830 Engine Test Cells/Stands 

3.73 5/28/03 68FR31746 Coating of Wood Building Products 

3.74 5/29/03 68 FR32172 Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textile 

3.75 8/4/04 69 FR47001 Printing, Coating, and Dyeing of Fabrics and Other Textiles 

3.76 5/30/03 68 FR32586 ! General Provisions; and Requirements for Control 

Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance 

With Clean Air Act Sections, Sections 1l2(g) and 1120) 

3.77 7111/05 70FR39662 Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for 

Major Sources in Accordance With Clean Air Act Sections, 

6/23/03 = Sections 112(g) and 112(j) i 

3.78 68 FR37334 Hazardous Air Pollutants Delegations' Provisions 

3.79 10/8/03 68 FR58172 Site Remediation 

3.80 11129/06 71 FR69011 Site Remediation 

3.81 11/10/03 68 FR63852 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

3.82 7/1/05 70 FR38554 Miscellaneous ()rganic Chemical Manufacturing 

3.83 8/30/05 70 FR51269 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

3.84 3/l/06 71 FR 10439 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

3.85 7/14/06 71 FR40316 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 

3.86 11/13/03 68 FR64432 Surface Coating of Metal Cans 

rWs 12128/05 70 FR 76918 Surface Coating of Metal Cans 

12111/03 68 FR69036 Delegation of Authority to New Mexico 

i. 3.89 12/9/05 70 FR 73138 Delegation of Authority to Albuquerque, 

Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board i 

3.90 1219/05 70 FR 73183 Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(1) Program for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority to the 

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board I 

3.91 12/19/03 68 FR 70904 Mercury Emissions From Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants i 

3.92 12/19/03 68 FR 70948 Chlorine and Hydrochloric Acid Emissions From Chlorine 

Production I • 3.93 I 12111103 68FR69164 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.94 I 12129/03 ~8 FR 75033 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.95 5113/05 0 FR 25676 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.96 7/6/05 70 FR38780 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.97 12/21/05 70 FR 75924 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.98 10/4/06 71 FR58499 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 

3.99 112/04 69 FR 130 Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products 

• 3.100 l/5/04 69 FR394 Lime Manufacturing Plants 

3.101 213/04 69 FR 5038 Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline 

3.102 7128/06 71 FR42898 Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) 

3.103 3/5/04 69 FR 10512 Stationary Combustion Turbines 

NMED 3- PAGE 3 
3.104 8/18/04 69 FR51184 Statio~ Combustion Turbines J:sta_TI 

3.105 4/22/04 69 FR21906 Iron and Steel Foundries 

3.106 5/20/05 70FR29400 Iron and Steel Foundries 

3.107 4/26/04 69 FR22602 Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks 

3.108 7/19/04 69 FR42885 Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and 

Chromium Anodizin_g_ Tanks 

3.109 7/30/04 69 FR45944 Plywood and Composite Wood Products; Effluent Limitations 

Guidelines and Standards for the Timber Products Point 

Source Category; List of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Lesser 

Quanti!Y_ Desig!!__ations, Source Cat~ List 

3.110 2/16/06 71 FR8342 Plywood and Composite Wood Products; List of Hazardous 

Air Pollutants, Lesser Quantity Designations, Source 

Category List 

3.111 9/1/04 69 FR53338 Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production 

3.112 9113/04 69 FR 55218 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process 

Heaters 

3.113 12/28/05 70 FR 76918 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process 

Heaters:Reconsideration 

3.114 11129/04 69 FR69320 Petition Process, Lesser Quantity Designations, Source 

Category List; Petition To Delist of Ethylene Glycol 

Monobutyl Ether 

3.115 12123/04 69 FR 76859 Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Synthetic 

Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Other 

Processes Subject to the Negotiated Regulation for 

Equipments Leaks 

3.116 6/14/06 71 FR34422 Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic 

Chemical Manufacturing Industry 

3.117 2/7/05 70 FR 6355 Leather Finishing Operations 

3.118 2/9/05 70 FR6930 Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic 

Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units 

3.119 3/29/05 70 FR 15994 Revision of December 2000 Regulatory Finding on the 

Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Electric Utility 

Steam Generating Units and the Removal of Coal- and OilFired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units From the 

Section 112(c) List 

3.120 617105 70FR33000 Revision of December 2000 Regulatory Finding on the 

Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Electric Utility 

Steam Generating Units and the Removal of Coal- and OilFired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units From the 

Section 112(c) List 

3.121 4/13/05 70 FR 19266 Generic Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards; and National Emission Standards for Ethylene 

Manufacturing Process Units: Heat Exchange Systems and 

Waste Operations 

3.122 5/13/05 70 FR25666 Pharmaceuticals Production 

3.123 6/14/05 70 FR34538 Waste Management System; Testing and Monitoring 

Activities; Final Rule: Methods Innovation Rule and SW-846 

Final Update IIIB 

3.124 10/12005 70 FR59402 Final Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous 

Waste Combustors (Phase I Final Replacement Standards and 

Phase_ID 

3.125 12/19/02 67 FR 77687 Waste Combustors-Corrections 

3.126 12/19/05 70FR 75042 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 

Combustors 

3.127 9/6/06 71 FR52624 Waste Combustors @econsideration) 

NMED 3-PAGE 4 
3.128 10/25/06 71 FR 62388 Waste Combustors (Amendment)_ 

3.129 6/24/05 70 FR 36523 Cellulose Products Manufacturing_ 

3.130 8/10/05 70 FR46684 Cellulose Products Manufacturing 

3.131 7/14/05 70FR40672 Primary Copper Smelting 

3.132 11/2/05 70 FR 66280 Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants 

3.133 12/19/05 70 FR 75320 Exemption of Certain Area Sources From Title V Operating 

Permit Programs 

3.134 12/19/05 70 FR 75042 List of Hazardous Air Pollutants, Petition Process, Lesser 

Quantity Designations, Source Category List 

3.135 417106 71 FR 17720 Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations 

3.136 4/7/06 71 FR 17712 Sterilization Facilities 

3.137 417106 71 FR 17729 Industrial Process Cooling Towers 

3.138 4/20/06 71 FR 20446 General Provisions 

3.139 5/24/06 71 FR 29792 Printing and Publishing_ Industry 

3.140 7/27/06 71 FR42724 National Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry 

Cleaning Facilities 

3.141 9/21/06 71 FR55280 Dry Cleaning Facilities 

3.142 8/17/06 71 FR 4'/670 Halogenated Solvent Cleaning 

3.143 10/6/06 71 FR 59302 Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production, Primary 

Copper Smelting, Secondary Copper Smelting, and Primary 

Nonferrous Metals--Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium 

3.144 ll/6/06 71 FR64907 Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers 

3.145 1119/06 71 FR66064 Source Categories: Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals, 

Bulk Plants, Pipeline Facilities, and Gasoline Dispensing 

Facilities 

NMED3-PAGE5 
EXHIBIT NMED 4 

State of New Mexico 

Environmental Improvement Board 

IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO: 

EXHIBIT 

I NME.O Lf 

20.2.78 NMAC- EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

20.2.82 NMAC- MAXIMUM ACHIEVEABLE CONTROL TECHNOLGY STANDARDS 

FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT SPILLERS 

I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 

Chair and Members of the Environmental Improvement Board (Board), I am here on behalf of 

the Environmental Protection Division of the New Mexico Environment Department to present 

proposed revisions to Parts 78 and 82 of the Air Quality Control Regulations. Part 78 is 

codified as 20.2. 78 NMAC- Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Part 82 is 

codified as 20.2. 82 NMAC -Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source 

Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants. Copies of the proposed revisions will be submitted 

respectively as Exhibit NMED 1 and Exhibit NMED 2. In these exhibits new material is shown 

as underlined and deleted material shown as bracketed and strike-out. From now on, I will refer 

to these rules as Parts 78 and 82, respectively. 

The purpose of the proposed revisions to parts 78 and 82 is to incorporate by reference new 

rules, corrections, revisions and amendments promulgated by the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) regarding the federal National Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 

and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards for Source categories of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants. The EPA has delegated to New Mexico the authority to implement the 

NESHAP and MACT at affected sources within its jurisdiction. The proposed amendments to 

part 78 NESHAP rules were published in the Federal Register from September 2, 2001 to 

November 30, 2006, and part 82 MACT rules were published in the Federal Register from 

September 2, 2002 to November 30,2006. 

The Board is authorized by Section 74-2-5.C(2) of the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act to 

adopt performance standards and emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. Such 

standards shall be "no more stringent than but at least as stringent as" the federal requirements. 

The Board's adoption of the federal requirements comports with this statutory limitation and does 

not alter the substantive obligations of affected sources because affected sources already must 

comply with the federal requirements as promulgated through November 30, 2006. As a result, 

the Board's adoption of the proposed revisions serves the sole purpose of ensuring that the 

Division has the regulatory authority to implement the federal requirements pursuant to the 

delegation from EPA. 

SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 1 
The Board's incorporation by reference of the proposed revisions to the NESHAPs and MACT 

benefits New Mexico. The EPA delegated to New Mexico the authority to implement the 

NESHAP on March 15, 1985. The EPA delegated to New Mexico the authority to implement 

the MACT on July 27, 1995. Under the delegation agreements, the Division must update its 

regulations annually to reflect the current federal requirements for NSPS, MACT, and NESHAP. 

Both the EPA and regulated sources prefer that New Mexico implement the NESHAP, and 

MACT. State implementation conserves federal resources, and the federal requirements are 

more effectively implemented and enforced by the same Air Quality Bureau personnel who 

review permit applications, issue permits, test, and inspect regulated sources in New Mexico. 

Potential disputes regarding the NESHAP, and MACT are more efficiently resolved at the state 

level (although the Division routinely consults with the EPA to ensure consistency with national 

practice). 

ll. PART 78 REVISION 

The EIB first adopted National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) by 

reference in 1984. These standards are contained within 40 CFR Part 61. The Department is 

proposing that Part 78 be amended to incorporate by reference the federal requirements 

pertaining to NESHAP rules promulgated by the EPA from September 2, 2001 through 

November 30, 2006. There are eight changes to the NESHAP during this time period. 

Radionuclides 

A. There is one final rule that was promulgated during this time period, however, this NESHAP 

is for radionuclides which New Mexico made the decision not to adopt this portion of the 

NESHAPs. The Amendments were to 40 CFR 61 Subparts H & L Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. In 

1987, it was decided that the State ofNew Mexico lacked the resources to assume Subparts B, H, 

I, K, and W of 40 CFR Part 61 of the Federal Air Quality Program for NESHAPs. These 

subparts are the Radionulides portion of the regulated Hazardous Air Pollutants of the Federal 

Air Program. These subparts continue to be enforced at the federal leveL Subsection 1 O.B of 

Part 78 presently excludes Subparts H & I from incorporation by reference. Therefore, today's 

proposed amendment to the effective dates in Part 78 will not affect these Subparts -in other 

words, Subparts H & I will continue to be excluded. 

Benzene Waste Operations 

A. The EPA is making a partial withdrawal ofthe direct final rule for benzene waste operations. 

Exhibit NMED 3.3. 

B. The EPA issued amendments to the national emission standard for benzene waste operations. 

Exhibit NMED 3.4. 

Asbestos 

SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 2 
A. The EPA amended the citation for labeling containers of asbestos waste materials Exhibit 

NMED3.5 

B. The EPA corrected typographical errors in Table 1. Exhibit NMED 3.6. 

Delegation of Authority 

A. The EPA has delegated authority to the State of New Mexico for NSPS and MACT. Exhibit 

NMED3.7. 

B. The EPA has delegated authority to Albuquerque-Bernalillo County for NSPS and NESHAP. 

ExhibitNMED 3.8 

ill Part 82 Proposed Revisions 

The EIB first adopted Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards (MACT) by 

reference in 1994. These Standards are in 40 CFR Part 63. The Department is proposing that 

Part 82 be amended to incorporate by reference the federal requirements pertaining to the MACT 

standards for source categories of hazardous air pollutants, promulgated by the EPA from 

September 2, 2002 to November 30,2006. There were 137 changes to the MACT during this 

time period. 

Let me summarize the some of the MACT changes that would be incorporated by reference. 

Pesticide Active Ingredient Productions 

In this action, EPA takes final action on those proposed amendments to the rule to address 

issues raised by petitioners and to correct inconsistencies that have been discovered since EPA 

originally promulgated the rule. Exhibit NMED 3.9. 

Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

The EPA adopted the MACT for stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines with a site 

rating of more than 500 brake horsepower. The EPA has identified these as major sources of 

hazardous air pollutants (HAP) enrissions such as formaldehyde, acrolein, methanol, and 

acetaldehyde. The NESHAP will implement section 112(d) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) by 

requiring all major sources to meet HAP enrission standards reflecting the application of the 

maximum achievable control technology. Exhibit NMED 3.29. 

Reinforced Plastic Composites Production 

A. The EPA adopted the MACT for new and existing reinforced plastic composites production 

facilities. This will regulate production and ancillary processes used to manufacture products 

with thermoset resins and gel coats. Reinforced plastic composites production facilities emit 

hazardous air pollutants (HAP), such as styrene, methyl methacrylate (MMA), and methylene 

SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 3 
chloride (dichloromethane). Methylene chloride has been classified as a probable human 

carcinogen. Exhibit NMED 3.55. 

B. The direct final amendments revise compliance options for open molding, correct errors, and 

add clarification to sections of the rule. Exhibit NMED 3.56. 

Stationary Combustion Turbines 

A. The EPA adopted the MACT for stationary combustion turbines. They have identified 

stationary combustion turbines as major sources of hazardous air pollutants emissions. In the 

fmal rule, the EPA has divided the stationary combustion turbine category into eight 

subcategories, including lean premix gas-fired turbines, lean premix oil-fired turbines, diffusion 

flame gas-fired turbines, diffusion flame oil-fired turbines, emergency turbines, turbines with a 

rated peak power output ofless than 1.0 megawatt (MW), turbines burning landfill or digester 

gas, and turbines located on the North Slope of Alaska The EPA has also adopted a final 

emission standard requiring control of formaldehyde emissions for all new or reconstructed 

stationary combustion turbines in the four lean premix and diffusion flame subcategories. 

ExhibitNMED 3.103. 

B. The EPA is staying the effectiveness of two subcategories of the final rule for stationary 

combustion turbines: Lean premix gas-fired turbines and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines. 

Exhibit NMED 3.104. 

National Perchloroethylene Air Emission Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities 

A . The EPA is promulgating revised standards to limit emissions of perchloroethylene (PCE) 

from existing and new dry cleaning facilities. The final standards are expected to provide further 

reductions ofPCE beyond the 1993 national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants 

(NESHAP), based on application of equipment and work practice standards and, in certain 

situations, disallowing the use of PCE at dry cleaning facilities. In addition, EPA is taking this 

opportunity to make some technical corrections to the 1993 Dry Cleaning NESHAP. Exhibit 

NMED3.140. 

B. The EPA is making a correction to §63.323(b)(l). Exhibit NMED 3.141. 

SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 4 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

EIB 06-16 (R) 

Revisions to: 

20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants 

20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air 

Proof of Publishing NMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82 in the 

New Mexico Register and Albuquerque Journal 
NEwMEXICO . 

.I 

ENVIRONMENTAl 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBUC MEETING 

AND AULE~~ING HEARINq . 

The . New Mexico· En~iio~~ental lmprQVef1lenl B~ar~ ("Board") will . '· hold a pubf~ hBillJng ·(!II April 3; 2007 at 9:00 a.m. at-the Alamosa / Mul!l;~er\fice Cellh!(, Meeting .Roo~ A,. 6900. Gonzai!!S · ro~a. I 

SW, AlbUfiuerque, ·New MexiCO 

87121' :The purpose ollhe.hearing ' . is to consider ·the.\lllatter cif EIB ' :. ~16'{A), pro~sed reviSions .to· 

Atr Quality Control, :Regulations 

20.2-.75 NMAC:(Errils$ion Stan~· 

dardS lor Haiardous· Air Poilut'· 

ants) and 20.2.82 NMAC 

(Maximum .Achievable Control 

r eclmology Staridaids:for Source . Categori~ of HaZardous /JJr Pol' lu~r: ;. , ': :: .. · .-.: 

The propenent 0! thil( .rewlal~ry adoption and revision Is the New 

Mexico Ellvfromrient ·oeP.artnient ('NMED"~ •. '·: • ·. :. : •, 

NMED p~pos~ to ~vi~e ~.2.78 NMAC to Incorporate W reference. 

federal National Emission Stati=' 

dards for Haiardolis Ai' Pollutants. 

NMED proposes to revise 202.82 

NMAC to- incorporate by .reference 

federal Maximum Ai:hievabl_e Con--

trol TechnoiO!jY ·Standards ·lor Sou~ce Categones. . · 

The p~n~~~d i~v~~d regut~iions maY, ~(! during regul!lr bus11 .urs. at the NMEO ·Air Qual~ 4reau .office· 2044 Gallsleo, :;anta Fe, New 'Mexico. Fun 

text of NMED's proposed revise(! 

regulations are availabhi on N M E"D·~.s·w e·b 1r 1.1 e .at· 

www.n!flE!nv.state.n!luis; or ~ 

contacttng Ro~ert ~Pt!lers a\ (505) . 955:8046 or · ·. ·.' :: , ... ~ · robertspUter~~state,n~.us: .. · 

STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

County of Bernalillo SS 

Bill Tafoya, being duly sworn, declares and says that he is Classified 

Advertising Manager of The Albuquerque Journal, and that this newspaper is 

duly qualified to publish legal notices or advertisements within the meaning of 

Section 3, Chapter 167, Session Laws of 1937, and that payment therefore has 

been made of assessed as court cost; that the notice, copy of which is hereto 

attached, was published in said paper in the regular daily edition, for 

./

~ : ~times,) the first publication being on the ~ day of 

_ __. ....rJ. _ sequent consecutive publications on 

--------~~~~--~~-------------------------··20 __ . 

before me, a Notary Public, in and 

for the County Bernalillo and State of New Mexico this 

~ q day of._C -;rl'-"'P-'....qc.L..L. __ of 200 .'1, 

f7 PRICE~ ( :;6 ~ c @?C( 

Statement to come at end of month. 

ACCOUNT NUMBER C. 8' 0 Cj :2i {) 

CLA-22-A (R-1193) 

The. hearing Will. be conducted in 

accordimce with 20.1.1· NMAC 

(AulemakinQ Procedures • Environmental lrrijlrovement ·Board),' 

the .Environmental lmprovemeRI 

Act, 8ection.74-1·9 NMSA 1978, 

the fJJr Quality .Com_ rol Aci.Section, 

74;2-6 NMSA 1978, an~ other appliCable Pll)Cf!du~, · • , ' 

An ~rest~d persons will be' given 

reasonable ilppo!'lunity:' af the 

hearing to, s'ubmij relevant evi~ 

dence, data, views and ar_guments, ·orally .or In' writing, w introduce 

exhibits, and to examine withess- es. Persons wishing to present 

technical testimony must file with 

the.Board a written notice of infeR! . to do so. The notice of intent shall: 

(1) identify ihe person for ·whom 

the witness(es) willtestif)i; •. · · (2) .identify each technicill wi)I)ess ihat the person IntendS to. present 

and state 1he guaflfiCations of .the wH~eS&. llicludmg a ·description 0! 

the1r: education and work backg~~=o~J:~dJ~ nical. witness and stale the antic~. 

paled _duration of the testim_ oiiy o_( that witness; · ' :· • · (4) fist and descnbe; or attach, 

each exhlbH ~ted Iii be offe~~ ·!hat ~~,:~.the ~e,ar­

:~ aitacll ·~leX! ill ,aiiy. re~om­ mended modifications to the progosed rJ!!W: and rey~sed regulaens •..... ·'-·.,:,' '· 

Not~es of ~ient. lor ihe hearing 

must· be .received in\he. Office· ol 

the Board not later than 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007; and should 

·reference the docket numbe~ EIB . 06-:16- (R), and 1he date· .o/ the· 

hearing. Notices of intent to present ,~lm_icaltestiinony shoul~ be .

1 submitted to: . . · • • . t 

J~ce. · Medina, ~SrdAdm. inistrator J 

Office of the Envtronmentat . Improvement Board ... ' · · '· · 

Harold Runnels BUilding • . 1190 St. Francis Dr., . · Room N-2150/2153 · · Santa Fe; NM 87502 • PhOne: (505) 827-2425, 

Fax (50S) 827-2836 . . . • - > ~ 

Any me~ber of !he geri~ral public 

maY. teS!ffY at the. hearing. No prior notification .. is required to present : 

non:t_e~hn. 1cal t~stirnQny at. the he~ ~ auc;lpilember, may also· :olfe( exhibits in . connection. 

V!ilf:i his .testimony; so long as the 

exhlbn is not unduly repetitious of 

the testimony., : , , · ; · 

~~~~~ ~o~u~er~rnf~ state_m_ent for the record, .Jn Tteu of 

provtdmg pral testimony at the 

hearing, .ShaD file the_ 'Written statement prio~ to the hearing, or submft ft at !he he¥!1ig. · · .. · · · · 

1

1 

Judy 

~~~~i~roc llei1IJey __ ~_· ~~. bv March e~1~1~ 19 2007at 

the .. NMEP,,_' F'erson. nel Servic __ es Bureau, P .u. BoX" 26110 1190 St. 

Francis ·Drive, Santa i=e-, New 

M exlco, .• B750~ ·,t~lephon e 505-82? -987?, :JD.r us~rs please access her number via the New . Mnlco Relay ·Network a1 1.-800-65!l-8331/. : .:··. . . . . 

:In~· ~rd.~~{~~ a ~~ci~ion·. , on 1he'froposed }evisiO<t ·.regula- . lions il :tlie i:onehlsion 'Ofthe .h~aring; 'or 1/Je ~aard may :eon,· -ven_. e a.m ..e.~!ll'!9 __ atter_the _liea_nng to cons1der act1on on the propo!iaf. 

Jou'~uiJanu~ri t8, 2~~.':: · · · · 

.. -~··, ·-··-··-·· 
New Mexico Commission of Public Records 

Administrative Law Division 

1205 Camino Carlos Rey 

Santa Fe, NM 87507 

505-476-7907 

Affidavit of Publication in the New Mexico Register 

I certify that the agency noted below has published legal notices or rules in the New Mexico 

Register, and that payment has been assessed by invoice for said legal notice or publication, 

which appeared on the date and in the volume and issue number noted below. 

Date of Publication: 113112007 

Volume: XVII Issue # : 2 

Invoice# : NMR-2007- 196 

Amount: $28.50 

Description: 

Notice 

Attest: JL_ /1; ?:!;,~ Publisher, "f1w Mexico Re;!er 

Administrative Law Division 

New Mexico Commission of Public Records 

Agency: 

Em- Air Qual 

Contact: Robert Spillers 

2044 Galisteo 

Santa Fe, NM 87502-

Notice of Public Meeting and Rulemaking Hearing 

Date: 1131/2007 

Notice to Publishing Agency 

Enclosed are your agency's proof copies of the legal notices or rules which were published in the New 

Mexico Register. These document the fact that your Notice ofRulemaking, Proposed Rule, or 

Adopted Rule has been published in the New Mexico Register. 

Forrn S RC-2002-04 
New Mexico Register I Volume XVIII, Number 2/ January 31,2007 25 

Notices of Rulemaking and Proposed Rules 

NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND 

RULEMAKING HEARING 

The New Mexico Environmental 

Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a 

public hearing on April 3, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, 

Meeting Room A, 6900 Gonzales Road, 

SW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 8712 I. 

The purpose of the hearing is to consider the 

matter of EIB 06-15 (R) to adopt a new regulation, 20.2.85 NMAC (Mercury Emission 

Standards and Compliance Schedules for 

Electric Generating Units), and make related revisions to 20.2.71 NMAC (Operating 

Permit Emission Fees), 20.2.77 NMAC 

(New Source Performance Standards), and 

20.2.84 NMAC (Acid Rain Permits). 

The proponent of this regulatory adoption 

and revision is the New Mexico 

Environment Department ("NMED"). 

NMED proposes to adopt 20.2.85 NMAC to 

create mercury emission limitations and 

compliance schedules for electric generating units. In doing so, NMED proposes to 

satisfy obligations pursuant to the federal 

Environmental Protection Agency's Clean 

Air Mercury Rule. NMED proposes to 

revise 20.2.71 NMAC to incorporate fees 

for mercury emission limitations. NMED 

proposes to revise 20.2. 77 NMAC to incorporate by .reference federal New Source 

Performance Standards. NMED proposes 

to revise 20.2.84 NMAC to incorporate definitions added to federal regulations as pa."1 

of the Clean Air Mercury Rule. 

The proposed new and revised regulations 

may be reviewed during regular business 

hours at the NMED Air Quality Bureau 

office, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, New 

Mexico. Full text of NMED's proposed 

new and revised regulations are available on 

NMED 's web site at 

www.nmenv.state.nm.us, or by contacting 

Andy Berger at (505) 955-8034 or 

andy.berger@state.nm.us. 

The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20. Ll NMAC (Rulemaking 

Procedures - Environmental Improvement 

Board), the Environmental Improvement 

Act Section 74-l-9 NMSA 1978, the Air 

Qu~lity Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 

1978 and other applicable procedures. 

All interested persons will be given reasonable opportunity at the hearing to submit 

relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce 

exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Persons 

wishing to present technical testimony must 

file with the Board a written notice of intent 

to do so. The notice of intent shall: 

(I) identifY the person for whom the witness( es) will testify; 

(2) identifY each technical witness that the 

person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a 

description of their education and work 

background; 

(3) summarize or include a copy of the 

direct testimony of each technical witness 

and state the anticipated duration of the testimony of that witness; 

(4) list and describe, or attach, each exhibit 

anticipated to be offered by that person at 

the hearing; and 

(5) attach the text of any recommended 

modifications to the proposed new and 

revised regulations. 

Notices of intent for the hearing must be 

received in the Office of the Board not later 

than 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007, and 

should reference the docket number, EIB 

06-15 (R), and the date of the hearing. 

Notices of intent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: 

Joyce Medina, Board Administrator 

Office of the Environmental Improvement 

Board 

Harold Runnels Building 

1 I 90 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 I 2153 

Santa Fe, NM 87502 

Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-

2836 

Any member of the general public may testifY at the hearing. No prior notification is 

required to present non-technical testimony 

at the hearing. Any such member may also 

offer exhibits in connection with his testimony, so long as the exhibit is not unduly 

repetitious of the testimony. 

A member of the general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the 

record, in lieu of providing oral testimony at 

the hearing, shall file the written statement 

prior to the hearing, or submit it at the hearing. 

Persons having a disability and needing 

help in being a part of this hearing process 

should contact Judy Bentley by March 19, 

2001 at the NMED, Personnel Services 

Bureau, P.O. Box 2611 0, 1190 St. Francis 

Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TDY users please 

access her number via the New Mexico 

Relay Network at 1-800-659-8331. 

The Board may make a decision on the proposed new and revised regulations at the 

conclusion of the hearing, or the Board may 

convene a meeting after the hearing to consider action on the proposal. 

NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND 

RULEMAKING HEARING 

The New Mexico Environmental 

Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a 

public hearing on April3, 2007 at 9:00a.m. 

at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, 

Meeting Room A, 6900 Gonzales road, SW, 

Albuquerque, New Mexico 87121. The purpose of the hearing is to consider the matter 

ofEIB 06-16 (R), proposed revisions to Air 

Quality Control Regulations 20.2.78 

NMAC (Emission Standards for Hazardous 

Air Pollutants) and 20.2.82 NMAC 

(Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

Standards for Source Categories of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants). 

The proponent of this regulatory adoption 

and revtsiOn is the New Mexico 

Environment Department (''NMED"). 

NMED proposes to revise 20.2. 78 NMAC 

to incorporate by reference federal National 

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants. NMED proposes to revise 

20.2.82 NMAC to incorporate by reference 

federal Maximum Achievable Control 

Technology Standards for Source 

Categories. 

The proposed revised regulations may be 

reviewed during regular business hours at 

the NMED Air Quality Bureau office, 2044 

Galisteo, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Full text 

of NMED's proposed revised regulations 

are available on NMED's web site at 

www.nmenv.state.nm.us, or by contacting 

Robert Spillers at (505) 955-8046 or 

robert.spillers@state.nm.us. 

The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking 

Procedures - Environmental Improvement 

Board), the Environmental Improvement 
26 New Mexico Register I Volume XVIII, Number 2 I January 31, 2007 

Act, Section 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, the Air 

Quality Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 

1978, and other applicable procedures. 

I interested persons will be given reasonaole opportunity at the hearing to submit 

relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce 

exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Persons 

wishing to present technical testimony must 

file with the Board a written notice of intent 

to do so. The notice of intent shall: 

(1) identify the person for whom the witness( es) will testify; 

(2) identify each technical witness that the 

person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a 

description of their education and work 

background; 

(3) summarize or include a copy of the 

direct testimony of each technical witness 

and state the anticipated duration of the testimony of that witness; 

(4) list and describe, or attach, each exhibit 

anticipated to be offered by that person at 

the hearing; and 

(5) attach the text of any recommended 

modifications to the proposed new and 

revised regulations. 

"''atices of intent for the hearing must be 

ceived in the Office of the Board not later 

. .tan 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007, and 

should reference the docket number, EIB 

06-16 (R), and the date of the hearing. 

Notices of intent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: 

Joyce Medina, Board Administrator 

Office of the Environmental Improvement 

Board 

Harold Runnels Building 

1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 I 2153 

Santa Fe, NM 87502 

Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-

2836 

Any member of the general public may testify at the hearing. No prior notification is 

required to present non-technical testimony 

at the hearing. Any such member may also 

offer exhibits in connection with his testimony, so long as the exhibit is not unduly 

repetitious ofthe testimony. 

A member of the general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the 

record, in lieu of providing oral testimony at 

the hearing, shall file the written statement 

·ior to the hearing, or submit it at the hear-

_,g. 

Persons having a disability and needing 

help in being a part of this hearing process 

should contact Judy Bentley by March 19, 

2007 at the NMED, Personnel Services 

Bureau, P.O. Box 26110, 1190 St. Francis 

Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TOY users please 

access her number via the New Mexico 

Relay Network at 1-800-659-8331. 

The Board may make a decision on the proposed revised regulations at the conclusion 

of the hearing, or the Board may convene a 

meeting after the hearing to consider action 

on the proposal. 

NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

I~ROVEMENTBOARD 

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL 

IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULE MAKING 

HEARING TO CONSIDER REPEAL 

AND REPLACEMENT OF 20.9.4 

NMAC, "SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN" REGULATIONS 

The New Mexico Environmental 

Improvement Board (Board) will hold a 

public rule making hearing beginning on 

April 3, 2007 and continuing thereafter as 

necessary, at the Alamosa Multi-Service 

Center, Meeting Room A, 6900 Gonzales 

Road SW, Albuquerque, NM 87121. The 

hearing location may change prior to April 

3 and those interested in attending should 

check the EIB website: 

http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/eib/index.ht 

ml prior to the hearing. The purpose of the 

hearing is to consider repeal and replacement of the Solid Waste Management Plan 

regulations, 20.9.4 NMAC. The New 

Mexico Environment Department is the 

proponent of the proposed replacement regulations. 

The Solid Waste Management Plan is 

intended to provide guidance concerning 

solid waste disposal issues and to assist 

waste management decision-makers, practitioners and communities. The replacement 

Plan will affect: waste characterization, 

waste diversion, siting and capacity of solid 

waste facilities, education, funding for disposal and diversion, and environmental justice. 

The proposed Plan may be reviewed during 

regular business hours at the office of the 

Environmental Improvement Board, Harold 

Runnels Building, 1190 St. Francis Drive, 

Room N-2153 Santa Fe, NM, 87505. 

Copies of the proposed Plan may be 

obtained by contacting Joyce Medina at 

(505) 827-2425 or by email at joyce.medina@state.nm.us. Please refer to Docket No. 

EIB 06-03(R). Written comments may be 

submitted to the EIB regarding the amended a,nd replaced Plan at the above address 

and should reference the docket number. 

The proposed Plan can also be found on the 

New Mexico Environment Department 

website at 

http://www.nmenv.state.nm. us/swb/pd£'SW 

. MPbody5.pdf. 

Please note formatting and minor technical 

changes in the proposed Plan may occur. In 

addition, the Board may make other amendments in response to ·comments submitted to 

the Board and evidence presented at the 

hearing. 

The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking 

Procedures) Environmental Improvement 

Board, the Environmental Improvement 

Act, NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-9, and other 

applicable procedures. 

All interested persons will be given reasonable opportunity at the hearing to submit 

relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce 

exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Any 

person who wishes to submit a non-technical written statement for the record in lieu 

of oral testimony shall file such statement 

prior to the close of the hearing. 

Persons wishing to present technical testimony must file with the Board a written 

notice of intent to do so. The notice of 

intent shall: 

- identify the person or entity for whom the 

witness(es) will testify; 

- identify each technical witness that the 

person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a 

description of their education and work 

background; 

- summarize or include a copy of the direct 

testimony of each technical witness and 

state the anticipated duration of the testimony of that witness; 

- list and describe, or attach, each exhibit 

anticipated to be offered by that person at 

the hearing; and 

- attach the text of any recommended modifications to the proposed changes. 

Notices of intent for the hearing must be 

received in the Office of the Environmental 

Improvement Board not later than 5:00 pm 

on March 19, 2007, and should reference 

the Solid Waste Management Plan, the date 

of the hearing, and docket number EIB 06-

03(R). Notices of intent to present technical 

testimony should be submitted to: 

Joyce Medina 

Office of the Environmental Improvement 

Board 

Harold Runnels Building 
- , - . . -.----- - --- o--

1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2153 

Santa Fe, NM 87502 

If you are an individual with a disability and 

you require assistance or an auxiliary aid, 

such as a sign language interpreter, to participate in any aspect of this process, please 

contact the Personnel Services Bureau by 

March 19, 2007. The Personnel Services 

Bureau can be reached at the New Mexico 

Environment Department, 1190 St Francis 

Drive, P.O. Box 26110, Santa Fe, NM 

87502, (505) 827-9872. TDD or TDY users 

may access this number via the New 

Mexico Relay Network 1-800-659-1779. 

The Board may make a decision on the proposed regulatory change at the conclusion 

of the hearing, or the Board may convene a 

meeting after the hearing to consider action 

on the proposal. 

NEW MEXICO HUMAN 

SERVICES DEPARTMENT 

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE DIVISION 

NOTICE 

The New Mexico Human Services 

Department (HSD) will hold a public hearing at I 0:00 am., on March 2, 2007, in the 

HSD Law Library at Pollen Plaza, 2009 S. 

Pacheco Street, Santa Fe, New Mexico. 

The subject of the hearing will be State 

Coverage Insurance (SCI). 

New Mexico Human Services Department 

is proposing regulation updates regarding 

the following: to clarify that premium payments for State Coverage Insurance (SCI) 

must be paid in full each month; that no partial payments of premiums or co-payments 

and no refunds of premiums will be 

allowed; that in appealing a denial or termination of SCI eligibility through an administrative hearing with the Department, an 

individual found to be eligible for SCI may 

enroll with an Managed Care Organization 

(MCO) but there is no retroactive enrollment or benefit coverage; that a potential 

SCI member has thirty days to send in the 

eligibility application and all documentation to the Income Support Division office 

after receiving the pre-enrollment (contact) 

letter from the MCO; and to effect various 

other minor revisions to clarify regulatory 

language. 

Interested persons may submit written comments no later than 5:00 p.m., March 2, 

2007, to Pamela S. Hyde, J.D., Secretary, 

Human Services Department, P.O. Box 

2348, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-2348. 

All written and oral testimony will be considered prior to issuance of the final regulation. 

If you are a person with a disability and you 

require this information in an alternative 

format or require a special accommodation 

to participate in any HSD public hearing, 

program or services, please contact the NM 

Human Services Department toll-free at 1-

888-997-2583, in Santa Fe at 827-3156, or 

through the department TDD system, 1-

800-609-4833, in Santa Fe call 827-3184. 

The Department requests at least 1 0 days 

advance notice to provide requested alternative formats and special accommodations. 

Copies of the Human Services Register are 

available for review on our Website at 

www.state.nm.us/hsd/register.html . or by 

sending a self-addressed stamped envelope 

to Medical Assistance Division, Program 

Oversight & Support Bureau, P.O. Box 

2348, Santa Fe, NM. 87504-2348. 

NE'V MEXICO PUBLIC 

REGULATION 

COMMISSION 

INSURANCE DIVISION 

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO 

SUPERINTENDENT 

OF INSURANCE 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AMENDING 

13.10.13 NMAC, 

MANAGED 

HEALTH CARE 

RULE 

NOTICE OF 

PROPOSED 

RULEMAKINq 

DOCKET NO. 

07-00017-IN 

HEARING 

ANDPROCEDURALORDER 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 

New Mexico Superintendent of Insurance 

("Superintendent") upon the instruction of 

the Legislature and the recommendations of 

Insurance Division Staff ("Staff'), proposes 

to amend 13.1 0.13 NMAC, Managed 

Health Care Rule. The Superintendent, 

being otherwise fully advised, FINDS and 

CONCLUDES THAT: 

I. The Managed Health Care Rule 

includes standards for credentialing and recredentialing, which states that, "At least 

every two years, MHCPs shall repeat primary verification of its participating 

providers and facilities to assure ongoing 

compliance with this section." Paragraph G 

of Section 13.10.13.13 NMAC. 

2. In 2003 the Legislature found that 

health care providers licensed in New 

Mexico are severely burdened by multiple 

layers of mandatory credentialing obligations, costing ~em, their patients and thirdparty payers needless expense and wasted 

time. As a result, state licensure provisions 

may be contributing to harmful delays and 

professional shortages in the state. Laws 

2003, ch. 235 Paragraph I, effective June 

30, 2003; NMSA I 978, Section 8-8-9.2, 

Temporary provisions. Based on these findings, the Legislature required that the 

Superintendent adopt rules that "shall 

require primary credential verification no 

more frequently than every three years 

and shall be scheduled to coincide with 

national accrediting organizations and hospital and managed care organizations' credentialing requirements." NMSA 1978, 

Section 8-8-9.2 (emphasis added). The 

Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 

NMAC, should be amended to conform to 

this legislative requirement. 

3. On May 3, 2004 the 

Superintendent promulgated a Grievance 

Procedures rule. 13.10.17 NMAC. The 

Grievance Procedures rule applies to al.l 

health care insurers that are covered under 

the Managed Health Care Rule. Staff recommends that the Managed Health Care 

Rule be amended to reflect that the 

Grievance Procedures rule has superseded 

the earlier provisions regarding grievances 

found in the Managed Health Care Rule, 

13.10.13 NMAC. The Managed Health 

Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, should be 

amended to conform with the subsequent 

Grievance Procedures rule. 

4. The Managed Health Care Rule, 

13.10.13 NMAC, is enforced by the superintendent of the Division of Insurance, 

Public Regulation Commission of the State 

of New Mexico. The Managed Health Care 

Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, should be amended 

to conform to the current designation of 

"Division" of Insurance within the Public 

Regulation Commission of the State of New 

Mexico. 

COPIES OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ARE AVAILABLE: 

a. by downloading from the Public 

Regulation Commission's website, 

www.nmprc.state.nm.us, under "Insurance 

Division," then "News" and "Proposed 

Rules, 13.10.13 NMAC, Managed Health 

Care Rule;" 

b. by sending a written request 

with the docket number, rule names, and 

rule numbers to the Public Regulation 

Commission's Docketing Office, P.O. Box 

1269, Santa Fe, NM 87504-1269 along with 

a self-addressed envelope and a check for 

$37.00 made payable to the Public 

Regulation Commission to cover the cost of 
NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND RULEMAKING HEARING 

The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a public hearing on 

April3, 2007 at 9:00a.m. at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting Room A, 6900 

Gonzales road, SW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87121. The purpose of the hearing is to consider 

the matter ofEIB 06-16 (R) proposed revisions to Air Quality Control Regulations 20.2.78 

NMAC (Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and 20.2.82 NMAC (Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants). 

The proponent of this regulatory adoption and revision is the New Mexico Environment 

Department ("NMED"). 

NMED proposes to revise 20.2.78 NMAC to incorporate by reference federal National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.82 NMAC to 

incorporate by reference federal Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for 

Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants. 

The proposed revised regulations may be reviewed during regular business hours at the NMED 

Air Quality Bureau office, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, New Mexico. A full text ofNMED's 

revised regulations are available on NMED's web site at www.nmenv.state.nm.us, or by 

contacting Robert Spillers at (505) 955-8046 or robert.spillers@state.nm.us. 

The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking Procedures -

Environmental Improvement Board), the Environmental Improvement Act, Section 7 4-1-9 

NMSA 1978, the Air Quality Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978, and other applicable 

procedures. 

All interested persons will be given reasonable opportunity at the hearing to submit relevant 

evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce exhibits, and to examine 

witnesses. Persons wishing to present technical testimony must file with the Board a written 

notice of intent to do so. The notice of intent shall: 

(1) identify the person for whom the witness(es) will testify; 

(2) identify each technical witness that the person intends to present and state the qualifications 

of the witness, including a description of their education and work background; 

(3) summarize or include a copy of the direct testimony of each technical witness and state the 

anticipated duration of the testimony of that witness; 

(4) list and describe, or attach, each exhibit anticipated to be offered by that person at the 

hearing; and 

(5) attach the text of any recommended modifications to the proposed new and revised 

regulations. 

Notices of intent for the hearing must be received in the Office of the Board not later than 5:00 

pm on March 19, 2007, and should reference the docket number, EIB 06-16 (R), and the date of 

the hearing. Notices of intent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: 
Joyce Medina, Board Administrator 

Office of the Environmental Improvement Board 

Harold Runnels Building 

1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 I 2153 

Santa Fe, NM 87502 

Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-2836 

Any member of the general public may testify at the hearing. No prior notification is required to 

present non-technical testimony at the hearing. Any such member may also offer exhibits in 

connection with his testimony, so long as the exhibit is not unduly repetitious of the testimony. 

A member of the general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the record, in lieu 

of providing oral testimony at the hearing, shall file the written statement prior to the hearing, or 

submit it at the hearing. 

Persons having a disability and needing help in being a part of this hearing process should 

contact Judy Bentley by March 19, 2007 at the NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 

26110, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TDY 

users please access her number via the New Mexico Relay Network at 1-800-659-8331. 

The Board may make a decision on the proposed new and revised regulations at the conclusion 

of the hearing, or the Board may convene a meeting after the hearing to consider action on the 

proposal. 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 

County of Bernalillo SS 

Bill Tafoya, being duly sworn, declares and says that he is Classified 

Advertising Manager of The Albuquerque Journal, and that this newspaper is 

duly qualified to publish legal notices or advertisements within the meaning of 

Section 3, Chapter 167, Session Laws of 1937, and that payment therefore has 

been made of assessed as court cost; that the notice, copy of which is hereto 

attached, was published in said paper in the regular daily edition, for 

~ times, the first publication being on the \ S day of 

---...._N\ (~ t.. , , f1 . bl' . --'f---J-v~ _ quent consecutive pu 1cat10ns on __ _ 

------------~~~~~-4-+------------------------~20 ___ . 

Sworn and subscri edt before me, a Notary Public, in and 

for the County of alillo and State of New Mexico this 

' ~day of )Y\ a..h , of 2001. +------? \ t 

PRICE -t '\ ;!_, ~ 1 0 ~· 

Statement to come at end of month. 

ACCOUNT NUMBER 

CLA-22-A (R-1/93) 

~NVOOO ~~ 

P- 6-e-qfi'""-
MESA DIRECTIVA PARA 

EL MEJORAMlENTO DEL 

MEDIO AMBlENTE 

DE NUEVO MEXICO 

DECLARACION DE 

AUDIENCIA PUBUCA 

SOBRE REGLAMENTOS 

La Mesa Directive para el mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de 

Nuevo Mexico ('Comite') tendra una audiencia publica el 3 de abril 1 del 2007 a las 9:00 a.m. en Ia 

Alamosa Multi-Service Center, 

Sala A, 6900 Gonzales Rd, SW, 

Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico 

871-21. El proposito de Ia junta es considerar Ia importancia de EIB 

06-16 {R), revis1ones propuestas 

para los reglamentos del control 

de Ia calioad del a ire 20.2. 78 

NMAC (Estandares de Emisiones 

de Contaminantes Peligrosos del 

Aire) y 20.2.82 NMAC {Estandares 

para el_ progreso del control y el 

maximo mejoramiento de Fuente 

de Categorias de Contaminantes 

Peligrosos del Aire) 

El defensor de Ia propuesta para 

Ia revision de los reglamentos es. el Departamento del Media Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico (NMED). 

NMED propane revisar el 20.2.78 

NMAC para incorporar Ia referencia federal de los Estandares de 

Emisiones de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire. La propuesta de 

NMED es revisar el 20.2.82 para 

incorporar Ia referencia federal los 

Estandares para et progreso del 

control y el maximo mejoramiento 

de Fuente de Categonas de Con: 

taminantes Peligrosos del Aire. 

Se puede revisar las reglas propuestas durante las horas de ne- 1 

gocio en Ia oficina del Departamento de Ia Calidad del Aire de 

NMED, 2044· Gaisteo, Santa Fe, 

Nuevo Mexico. El Texto complete 

de las reglas propuestas estan disponibles en el s1tio 

www.nmenv.state.r.m.us. 

Tambien puede contactar a Robert 

Spillers par telefono (505) 

955-8046 o p!!l correo electronico 

robert.spillers@ state .nm.us. 

La audiencia publica sera realizada en acuerdo a 20.1.1 NMAC 1 

fProcedimientos de Reglas • La 

1 Mesa Directiva para el Mejo- ·ramiento del MedJo Ambiente de 

Nuevo Mexico), el Aero para Mejorar el Annbiente, Seccion 74-1-9 

NMSA 1978, el Acto para el Contot de Ia Calidad del Aire, 74-2-6 

NMSA 1978, y tambien otras procedimientos aplicables. 

Todas las personas interesadas seran dado la oportunidad a som- eter evidencia pertinente, datos y 

1 opinions oral o escrito, intoduar 1 evidencia y examiner testigos. Las · personas que desean presenter 

testimonio tecnico Ieinen que 

someter una nota escrita. La nota 

escrita debe de: 

{1) identificar Ia ~ersona· para 

quien el (los) test1go(s) testific-

~)\~entificar cada testigo tecnico 

que Ia persona piensa presentar y indicar las calificaciones del testigo incluyendo una descripcion de s.u . educacion y trabajo. (3) resumir o incluyir una copia del 

testimonio directo de cada testigo tecnico e indicar Ia duracion antlc-

_pada del testimonio. 

(4) dar una descripcion o incluyir cada muestra que Ia personaof- recera en Ia vista del publico, y (5) incluyir et texto de cualquier modificacion a las regulaciones re•tisadas propuestas. 

Notificacion de intencion _Para Ia 

vista publ"1ca debe ser rec1b1de en Ia oficina del Comite antes de las 

5:00 pm el 19 _de marzo y debe 

contener el numero legal, El B 

06-16 (R), y Ia lecha .de Ia vista 

Debe de mandar not111caaon de 

intencion para presentar testimonio tecnico a: 

Joyce Medina, Board Administrator 

Office of the Environmental 

Improvement Board 

Harold Runnels Building 

1190 St." Francis Dr., 

Room N-2150 /2153 

Santa Fe. NM 87502 

Phone: (So5\ 827-2425, 

Fax (505) 827-2836 

Cualquier miembro.del gran publi- co puede testificar en Ia vista. No es necesario dar notificacion antes 

de presentar testimonio que no es tecnico. La persona puede ofrecer 

muestras que penenece al testimonio. 

Cualquier miembro del gran publi- co que desel! someter una declaracion escrita para el reg1stro, en vez de proporcionar testimonio 

oral en Ia vista, tiene que someter · Ia declaracion escrita antes de Ia 

vista o someterlo durante Ia vista. 

Las personas que tienen una incapacidad y neces~an ayuda para ser parte del proceso deben de 

contactar a Judy Bentley antes de 

et 19 de marzo, 2007 en el NMED, 

Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. 

Box 26110, 1190 St. Fran_cis 

Drive Santa Fe, Nuevo Mex1co, 

87502 telefono 505-827-9872. Los 

que usan el servicio de 'TDY' fa- vor de conseguir el acceso de su numero par el New Mexico Relay 

Network 1-800-659-8331. 

Es posible que el Com~e tamara una decicion sabre las r~gulaciones revisadas propuestas al 

conclucion de esta vista o el yo- mtte puede convocar una reumon despues de Ia vista para consid- erar acion sabre Ia propuesta. 

Journal: March 1~~5,_., 2,.-C00~7.___ __ 
MESA DIRECTIVA PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE DE NUEVO 

MEXICO DECLARACION DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA SOBRE REGLAMENTOS 

La Mesa Directiva para el mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico ("Comite") tendra una 

audienda publica el 3 de abril del 2007 a las 9:00 a.m. en Ia Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Sala A, 6900 

Gonzales Rd., SW, Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico 87121. El prop6sito de Ia junta es considerar Ia 

importancia de Em 06-16 (R), revisiones propuestas para los reglamentos del control de Ia calidad del aire 

20.2.78 NMAC (Estandares de Emisiones de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire) y 20.2.82 NMAC 

(Estandares para el progreso del control y el maximo mejoramiento de Fuente de Categorias de 

Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire) 

El defensor de Ia propuesta para Ia revision de los reglamentos es el Departamento del Medio Ambiente de 

Nuevo Mexico (NMED). 

NMED propone revisar el20.2.78 NMAC para incorporar Ia referenda federal de los Estandares de 

Emisi6nes de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire. La propuesta de NMED es revisar el20.2.82 para 

incorporar Ia referenda federal los Estandares para el progreso del control y el maximo mejoramiento de 

Fuente de Categorias de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire. 

Se puede revisar las reglas propuestas durante las horas de negocio en Ia oficina del Departamento de Ia 

Calidad del Aire de NMED, 2044 Gaisteo, Santa Fe, Nuevo Mexico. El Texto completo de las reglas 

propuestas estan disponibles en el sitio www.nmenv.state.nm.us. Tambien puede contactar a Robert 

Spillers por telefono (505) 955-8046 o por correo electr6nico robert.spillers@state.nm.us. 

La audiencia publica sera realizada en acuerdo a 20.1.1 NMAC (Procedimientos de Reg las -La Mesa 

Directiva para el Mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico), el Acto para Mejorar el Ambiente, 

Secci6n 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, el Acto para el Contol de Ia Calidad del Aire, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978, y tambien 

otras procedimientos aplicables. 

Todas las personas interesadas seran dado Ia oportunidad a someter evidencia pertinente, datos y opinions 

oral o escrito, intoducir evidencia y examiner testigos. Las personas que desean presentar testimonio 

tecnico teinen que someter una nota escrita. La nota escrita debe de: 

(1) identificar Ia persona para quien el (los) testigo(s) testificara{n) 

(2) identificar cada testigo tecnico que Ia persona piensa presentar y indicar las calificaci6nes del testigo 

incluyendo una descripci6n de su educaci6n y trabajo. 

(3) resumir o incluyir una copia del testimonio directo de cada testigo tecnico e indicar Ia duraci6n 

anticipada del testimonio. 

(4) dar una descripci6n o incluyir cada muestra que Ia persona ofrecera en Ia vista del publico, y 

(5) incluyir el texto de cualquier modificaci6n a las regulaci6nes revisadas propuestas. 

Notificaci6n de intenci6n para Ia vista publica debe ser recibido en Ia oficina del Comite antes de las 5:00 

pro el 19 de marzo y debe contener el numero legal, EIB 06-16 (R), y Ia fecha de Ia vista. Debe de mandar 

notificaci6n de intenci6n para presentar testimonio tecnico a: 

Joyce Medina, Board Administrator 

Office of the Environmental Improvement Board 

Harold Runnels Building 

1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 /2153 

Santa Fe, NM 87502 

Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-2836 

Cualquier miembro del gran publico puede testificar en Ia vista. No es necesario dar notificaci6n antes de 

presentar testimonio que no es tecnico. La persona puede ofrecer muestras que pertenece al testimonio. 
Cualquier miembro del gran publico que desea someter una declaraci6n escrita para el registro, en vez de 

proporcionar testimonio oral en Ia vista, tiene que someter Ia declaraci6n escrita antes de Ia vista o 

someterlo durante Ia vista. · 

Las personas que tienen una incapacidad y necesitan ayuda para ser parte del proceso deben de contactar a 

Judy Bentley antes de el19 de marzo, 2007 en el NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 26110, 

1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, Nuevo Mexico, 87502, telefono 505-827-9872. Los que usan el servicio 

de "TDY'' favor de conseguir el acceso de su nt1mero por el New Mexico Relay Network 1-800-659-8331. 

Es posible que el Comite tomara una decici6n sobre las regulaciones revisadas propuestas al concluci6n de 

esta vista o el Comite puede convocar una reunion despues de Ia vista para considerar aci6n sobre Ia 

propuesta.