alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY OfficeofAirQualityPlanningand Standards

. ResearchTriangle Park, NorthCarolina27711 

### COpy 

# :30APR1992
MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Maintenance Plans for Redesignation of Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Nonattainment Areas FROM: G.T. Helms, Chief Ozone/Carbon Monoxide Programs Branch (MD-15) TO: Air Branch Chief, Regions I-X
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide clarification of an issue related to maintenance plans for ozone and carbon monoxide. This issue concerns the maintenance demonstration and, in particular, the projection of emissions. In order to make the review of the demonstration easier for both EPARegions and Headquarters, State submittals should clearly show the procedure used to project future emissions. There has been some concern that ifthe procedure is not clear, it is very difficult to evaluate the demonstration. The procedure used should be consistent with the guidance contained in the EPAdocument "Procedures for Preparing Emission Inventory Projections" (EPA450/4-91-019). According to this document, projected emissions should reflect the allowable emission rate and the expected actual production or activity level. Ifyou have any further questions concerning this subject, please contact Laurel Schultz at (919) 541-5511.
#### UELE of Faleniu, Plaintiff v. TALENI of Faleniu, Defendant

No. 4-1932

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Matai Name: “Maea” of Faleniu]

August 2, 1932

*459HARRY P. WOOD, *Chief Justice;*PELE, *Associate Judge;*and LUTU, *Associate Judge*

DECISION

This case came on to be heard on the 2nd day of August 1932 in the Courthouse in the Administration Building, U.S. Naval Station.

Present: *Chief Justice*WOOD, *Associate Judge*PELE, *Associate Judge*LUTU.

The proponent of the name Taleni was represented by his counsel Tuuga and the objector Uele was represented by his counsel Magalei.

It appeared from the testimony that Taleni the proponent of the name is the grandson of Maea Fatafuna, who was the last holder of the name. Uele according to the testimony of his counsel is the grandson of Maea Aiona.

The holders of the name Maea as named by Taleni are:

> Maea Leoo

> Maea Fatafuna

and the holders of the name Maea as named by counsel for the objector are:

> Maea Gasese

> Maea Aiona

> Maea Manavafeea

The Maea family is a small one and no one seemed to know just the number and extent of the lands owned by it. It was generally admitted that the last holder of the name had been dead for many years and that there had been no holder of the name since his death. Both Taleni and Uele *460testified that they had worked on the family lands but neither of them had assumed the duties of the Maea.

Magalei who was the chief sponsor for Uele testified that Fatafuna, the grandfather of Taleni, received his name Maea from Aiona. Magalei states that Uele is the grandson of Maea Aiona and the son of Magalei Tauau. Magalei claims the pule of the Maea family as Magalei and desired the Court to appoint his candidate to the name Maea with the understanding that he, Magalei, the chief of an entirely different family, would have the pule of the Maea family. It is not altogether clear to the Court just how Magalei derives this pule although he endeavored to explain it to the Court.

The evidence was undisputed that there was many years ago a holder of the name called Fatafuna and that Taleni is the grandson of this man. That there was a holder of the name Maea called Aiona from whom Uele traces his descent through Magalei is strenuously denied by Taleni and his counsel.

The Court is not permitted to discuss the relative fitness for the position of matai unless the claims of each are equal to the name, than [sic] the balance will tip in the favor of the one best prepared to hold the name by reason of education.

In this case it seems clear to the Court that Taleni has established the best hereditary right to the name Maea. He has stated that if given the name he will not recognize the pule of Magalei and will himself exercise the pule of the name over the affairs of the family. If the name were given to Uele it is very doubtful if he would do this as he apparently recognizes the pule of Magalei.

Upon all the evidence the Court is of the opinion that the matai name should be given to Taleni and it so decrees, with the costs of $25.00 to be paid by Uele and Magalei.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Liberty Self-Stor, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



By:  /s/ Richard M. Osborne              By:  /s/ Sherry L. Kirchenbauer
-----------------------------------      --------------------------------------
BY RICHARD M. OSBORNE                    BY SHERRY L. KIRCHENBAUER
Chairman of the Board and                Chief Financial Officer
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:          3/27/03                  Dated:           3/27/03
      -----------------------------            --------------------------------
Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification
Dated:  3/30/2007
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
By: /s/
Michelle Gill

Title:
Vice President
GS Mortgage Securities Corp.
I, Michelle Gill, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of  NEW CENTURY ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-ALT2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and
5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
Michelle Gill
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianU.S. Bank National Association, as TrusteeWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer
SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO FIFTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE





THIS SUPPLEMENT No. 2 TO FIFTH AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF LOAN AGREEMENT AND PROMISSORY NOTE by and between BLINK COUTURE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”) and REGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company (the “Payee”) entered into as of July 31, 2011, supplements and amends that certain Fifth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 (the “Amendment and Note Restatement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Amendment and Note Restatement.





For value received, the Maker and Payee hereby agree, effective as of the date hereof, that the following provisions shall supplement and become part of the Amendment and Note Restatement:





1.           Additional Advances.  The Parties hereby agree that during the period from May 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011, the Payee has made additional advances to the Maker, in the aggregate amount of $15,940, in payment of the Maker’s operating expenses during that period, so that effective as of July 31, 2011, the total outstanding principal amount due and payable pursuant to the Note is $226,973.





2.           No Further Changes; Full Force and Effect.  The additional advances described in Paragraph 1 above reflect all changes to the Amendment and Note Restatement. All other terms of the Amendment and Note Restatement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, unless and until further supplemented or amended hereafter.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has caused this Supplement No. 2 to Fifth Amendment and Restatement of Loan Agreement and Promissory Note to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.




BLINK COUTURE, INC.By:
/s/ Lawrence FieldName: Lawrence FieldTitle: President & CEOREGENT PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLCBy:
/s/ Cindy S. FieldName:  Cindy S. FieldTitle: Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
COMMERCE, INC. FORM 10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         346,314
<SECURITIES>                                   149,574
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,155
<PP&E>                                          85,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 680,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           894
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   680,766
<SALES>                                        154,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,303
<CGS>                                           32,127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                       251
<INVENTORY>                                      3,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,558
<PP&E>                                           2,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,105
<BONDS>                                          4,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,188
<SALES>                                          2,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,203
<CGS>                                            1,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,491)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRIC T ATTORNEY' S OFFIC E 

S S " & 424" Judicia l District s 

COUNTIE S O F 

BUUNCO * BUBNETT • IXAN O • BAN SAB A 

Wiley B. McAfee 

District Attorney 

May 14, 2015 

Mr. Jeffery D. Kyle 

Clerk of Cour t of Appeals 

P. O. Box 12457 

Austin, TX 78711 

Re: Case No. 03-15-00289-CR; Rafael Hernandez-Prado v. The State of Texas 

Appeal from Cause No. 9767 in the 33rd District Cour t of Burnet County 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

Please accept this letter as our designation of Lead Counsel for the State of 

Texas, Appellee, in the above described case. Lead Counsel for this case is: 

Gary W. Bunyard 

Assistant District Attorney 

P.O. Box 725 

Llano, TX 78643 

(325) 247-5755 (voice) 

(325) 247-5274 (fax) 

g.bunyard@co.llano.tx.us 

Texas State Bar No. 03353500 

811 Berry Street • P.O. Box 725 • Uano. Texas 78843 • 325-247-5755 • Fax 325-247-5274 

Sincerel 

cc: Mr. Gary E. Prust 

Attorney for Appellant 

via eServe 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00289-CR

5277265

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/14/2015 8:29:41 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/14/2015 8:29:41 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Saratoga Investment Corp. on
Form 10-K (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Christian
L. Oberbeck, the Chief Executive Officer and President and Richard A. Petrocelli, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary of Saratoga Investment
Corp., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

Date:
May 23, 2012

/s/ CHRISTIAN L. OBERBECK Name: Christian L. Oberbeck Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ RICHARD A. PETROCELLI Name: Richard A. Petrocelli Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer
and Secretary


---



QuickLinks
## AHRI and NRDC join forces to urge US 2025 deadline for R134a in new chillers 3 February, 2016 By Andrew Gaved 

### AHRI and Natural Resources Defenses Council issue joint letter supporting EPA SNAP proposal to prohibit R134a, R410A and R407C in new chillers from 2025 The Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration In stitute (AHRI) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) have issued a joint lette r to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in support of changing the status of certain refrigerants used in liquid chillers under the Significant New Alternatives P olicy (SNAP) program effective January 1, 2025. The full letter can be viewed here The two groups said they took this action following ’leng thy discussions’ on the importance of moving beyond high-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants used in chillers and consideration of factors such as the safety of alternatives, t he continued improvement of system efficiency, reasonable product development timelines, and the avoidance of market migration. The effective date was negotiated with those factors in mind. The two bodies emphasised their belief that the eight year window will provide adequate time for manufacturers to develop low-GWP alternatives t hat meet all the required safety and technical standards. AHRI President & CEO Stephen Yurek said: “This is anoth er example of industry and efficiency advocates working together toward environmental progress, while allowing sufficient time and predictability for manufacturers. We are grateful to the members of AHRI’s Liquid Chillers Product Section, who worked dilig ently to reach this agreement.” AHRI said the EPA is expected to decide in the coming mon ths whether or not to accede to this consensus recommendation.

• Sign up to the RAC weekly newsletter for the latest hea dlines Page 1 of 1 AHRI and NRDC join forces to urge US 2025 deadline for R134a in new chillers | News ...

2/ 5/2016 http://www.racplus.com/news/ahri - and-nrdc - join - forces - to - urge - us - 2025 - deadline - for- r134 ...
No. 76-6500.

#### Perkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
May 22, 2015 

 

Mr. Lautaro Cline 

8327 Aster Avenue 

Oakland, CA 94605 

Dear Mr. Lautaro Cline: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1001), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
### 13 Actual Adopted Est. Act. Proposed FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 Operating Expenditures Administration 3,546,003 $ 3,318,852

$ 3,209,190

$ 3,365,397

$ Engineering 2,098,466 2,262,271

2,206,501

1,226,442 Compliance - -

-

1,104,363

2,947,193 3,335,190

3,107,560

3,037,248 Operating Total 8,591,662 8,916,313

8,523,251

8,733,450

Other Financing Uses Increase in Fund Balance 740,280 241,927

843,772

219,952

Expenditure Plan Total 9,331,942 $ 9,158,240

$ 9,367,023

$ 8,953,402

$ EXPENDITURE PLAN

Technology &
Environmental Assessment

CHARACTER OF EXPENDITURES
Actual Adopted Est. Act. Proposed FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 Operating Expenditures Regular Salaries 3,606,760 $ 3,606,801

$ 3,500,712

$ 3,546,577

$ Extra Help - 2,588

2,588

2,588 Benefits 1,940,826 1,759,502

1,715,184

1,872,941 Salaries & Benefits Total 5,547,586

5,368,891

5,218,484

5,422,107

Services & Supplies 2,742,989 3,295,729

3,062,937

3,071,903

Other Charges 148,120 161,293

151,430

149,440

Fixed Assets 152,967 90,400

90,400

90,000

Operating Total 8,591,662 $ 8,916,313

$ 8,523,251

$ 8,733,450

$
Exhibit
10.34




WPCS
International-Suisun City, Inc.


521
Railroad Avenue


Fairfield,
California 94533





May 28, 2009








Gary
Walker


521
Railroad Avenue


Fairfield,
California 94533





Re:           Amendment to Employment
Agreement





Dear
Gary:





This
letter shall serve as an amendment to the employment agreement effective as of
February 1, 2007 between Employee and Employer (the “Agreement”). Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the
Agreement.  Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and
replaced in its entirety with the following:





“4.1.  Employer
shall pay to Employee an annual salary (the “Salary”) of One Hundred Fifty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($155,000.00), payable in equal installments at the end of such
regular payroll accounting periods as are established by Employer, or in such
other installments upon which the parties hereto shall mutually agree, and in
accordance with Employer’s usual payroll procedures, but no less frequently than
monthly.”





The
foregoing amendment shall be effective as of May 1, 2009.






WPCS
      International- Suisun City, Inc.By:
              /s/ Andrew
      HidalgoBy:  Andrew
      HidalgoTitle:  Director


Accepted
to and agreed this


28th  day
of May , 2009:




/s/
      Gary
      WalkerGary
      Walker
#### Eleanor Ruppert, an Infant, by Henry Ruppert, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, *v.*Board of Education, Union Free Schools, District No. 16, Town of Hempstead, Appellant.

Argued April 7, 1943;

decided May 27, 1943.

*795
      *H. H. Brown*and *James E. Turner*for appellant.

*Samuel G. Rabinor*and *Bernard Myerson*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
#### William M. Bacon, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Robert S. Koch, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellant.

(Argued December 16, 1872;

decided December 24, 1872.)

*A. P. Laming*for the appellant.

*George W. Qothra/n*for the respondent.

Judgments from single penalty affirmed with costs. No opinion.