alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11662]


Determination and Certification of the Foreign Assistance Act 
Relating to the Largest Exporting and Importing Countries of Certain 
Precursor Chemicals

    Pursuant to Section 490(b)(1)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961, as amended, I hereby determine and certify the top five exporting 
and importing countries and economies of pseudoephedrine and ephedrine 
(Canada, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, People's Republic of China, 
Republic of Korea, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United 
Kingdom) have cooperated fully with the United States, or have taken 
adequate steps on their own, to achieve full compliance with the goals 
and objectives established by the 1988 UN Convention Against Illicit 
Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
    This determination and certification shall be published in the 
Federal Register, and copies shall be provided to Congress together 
with the companying Memorandum of Justification.

    Dated: January 28, 2022.
Wendy R. Sherman,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-03743 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-17-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tremain THOMAS, a/k/a Tre, a/k/a Waka, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6123

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 26, 2017

Decided: July 6, 2017

. Tremain Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Day Rottenborn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tremain Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 794 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Muldrow,*844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016). Under § 3582(c)(2), the district court may modify the term of imprisonment “of a defendant who has been sentenced ... based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered,” if the amendment is listed in the Guidelines as retroactively applicable. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); *see*U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(a)(1), (d), p.s. (2016). Guideline § 1B1.10(d), p.s., lists the retroactively applicable amendments, and the list does not include Amendment 794, The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion in denying Thomas the relief he sought under Amendment 794. *See United States v. Dunphy,*551 F.3d 247, 249 n.2 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143294

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143294 COA: 301518 Isabella CC: 07-000830-FC GORDON DEVERE SCHULTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 15, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 By The Chief Executive Officer,
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002.
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Toys R Us, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarterly period ended May 2, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.
78m); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Gerald L. StorchGerald L. StorchChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of CytoGenix, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 1O-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Malcolm
H. Skolnick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.   /s/ Malcolm H.
Skolnick Malcolm H.
Skolnick Chief Executive
Officer   April 4, 2008
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------




                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
               10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
               this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-35CB (the
               "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken
               as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
               fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
               statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
               statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
               covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
               other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
               period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports;

          4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
               servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
               review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
               statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
               Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
               periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
               obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
               respects; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
               attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
               criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
               this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
               Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
               exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
               report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
               reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
          information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
          Bank of New York, as Trustee.

    Date: March 27, 2007


          /s/ Steve Bailey
          --------------------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
# Eiropas Savienības C 11A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0952
  doi:10.3000/19770952.CA2014.011.lav |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 11A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 57. sējums2014. gada 15. janvāris |

ISSN 1977-0952

doi:10.3000/19770952.CA2014.011.lav

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 11A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

57. sējums2014. gada 15. janvāris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| 2014/C 011A/01 | Labojums paziņojumā par izpilddirektora amata vakanci Eiropas Dzelzceļa aģentūrā (ERA) Francijā (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2014/10345 (OV C 6 A, 10.1.2014.) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

2014/C 011A/01

Labojums paziņojumā par izpilddirektora amata vakanci Eiropas Dzelzceļa aģentūrā (ERA) Francijā (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2014/10345 (OV C 6 A, 10.1.2014.)

ERA

(OV C 6 A, 10.1.2014.)

1

ATSKAITE PAR OFICIĀLĀ VĒSTNEŠA C A SĒRIJU KONKURSI

Lūdzu, skatīt sarakstu ar C A sērijas izdevumiem, kas publicēti šā gada laikā.

Ja nav norādīts citādi, Oficiālo Vēstnesi izdod visās valodu versijās.

Oficiālo Vēstnesi

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |

5

6

11

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 15.1.2014 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 11/1

---

Labojums paziņojumā par izpilddirektora amata vakanci Eiropas Dzelzceļa aģentūrā (ERA) Francijā

(pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe)

COM/2014/10345

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 6 A, 2014. gada 10. janvāris
  )

(2014/C 11 A/01)

4. lappusē nodaļas “Pieteikšanās kārtība” trešajā daļā interneta saiti lasīt šādi:

“https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/”.

---
Order entered August 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00452-CR

No. 05-13-00453-CR

No. 05-13-00454-CR

FABIAN FEDRICE GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-28079-H, F12-24798-H, F12-27927-H

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute these appeals, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 
appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeals.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit supplemental records, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                            9853
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   213505
<ALLOWANCES>                                      6036
<INVENTORY>                                     121382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                342979
<PP&E>                                          174390
<DEPRECIATION>                                   26530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  779521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           247597
<BONDS>                                         225004
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      200268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    779521
<SALES>                                         227093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                227093
<CGS>                                           165184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   165184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6839
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1996
<INCOME-TAX>                                       888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
William R. Klich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350 as adopted pursuant to Section (S)906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 9, 2003

/s/  William R. Klich
------------------------
William R. Klich
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Republic Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Republic
Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
f10k2011a1ex10xxxvii_yida.htm



Exhibit 10.37




 


[English Summary]







Fujian Yida Tulou Tourism Development Co. Ltd Loan Agreement







Borrower/Party A: Fujian Yida Tulou Tourism Development Co. Ltd


Lender/Party B: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, Hua’an Branch







Amount of loan: RMB 35 million







Purpose of loan: RMB 3.8 million for Construction Bank of China’s loan repayment, RMB 31.2 million for tourism destination development and construction.







Loan period: 7 years







Interest: 7.76% per annum







Repayment schedule: The 1st repayment date is on Feb. 22, 2012, the repayment amount is RMB 1.25 million. Borrower will repay RMB 1.25 million for every three months, until the last repayment date, Nov. 22, 2018.







Prepayments: Borrower has the flexibility to make prepayments with 20% compensation charge of the amount of prepayment.







Guaranty: Secured by the fixed assets of its subsidiary, Fujian Yida Tulou Tourism Development Co. Ltd and personal guarantees by two of company’s directors Mr. Minhua Chen and Ms. Yanling Fan as additional collateral.







Jurisdiction:


Laws of China







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, either party can resolve the dispute by the courts of Xiamen City.







Date of the Agreement:


Nov. 18, 2011


 




1
#### IN RE: Antonio MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid, Petitioner.

No. 17-1614

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 10, 2017

Decided: August 18, 2017

Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Mosley’s motion on July 13, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Mosley’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00436- CV
In the Matte r of D. D. H.

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 98TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -JV- 14- 0300 74, H ONO RAB LE RHO NDA HURLEY , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant D.D.H. has informed this Court that he no longe r wishes to pursue this appea l and has filed a motion to dismiss it. Appellant’s counsel states that he has confe rre d with counsel for

appellee The State of T exas, a nd it does not oppose this mot ion. We gr ant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a)
.

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: August 27, 2014
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben ZAPATA, III, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11694 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ruben Zapata, III, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Zapata, III, has moved for leave to *819withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zapata has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *819published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

y0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

143129

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143129 COA: 303154 Wayne CC: 09-029068-FC MARCUS MAKULSKI

, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 19, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT
(the “Agreement”), dated as of May 11, 2012, is entered into by and among Novelos Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”)
and Rodman & Renshaw, LLC (“Rodman”). Defined terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings
set forth in the Engagement Agreement (as defined below).


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to
an engagement agreement dated April 9, 2012 (the “Engagement Agreement”) the Company engaged the Rodman as its
lead or managing underwriter in connection with a proposed placement of registered securities of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Placement Agent desire to amend the Engagement Agreement as set forth hereunder.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agrees as follows:


 


		1.	Amendments.



 


		a.	In Section 1(B), the last sentence is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“The Company shall
advance Rodman the sum of $50,000 (the “Advance”) as an advance against Rodman’s actual outside legal expenses
upon execution hereof; provided, however, pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(C), Rodman shall reimburse the Company for any amount
of the Advance not actually incurred as an expense.”


 


		2.	Miscellaneous.



 


		a.	Except as expressly set forth above, all of the terms and conditions of the Engagement Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect after the execution of this Amendment Agreement and shall not be in any way changed, modified
or superseded by the terms set forth herein.



 


		b.	This Amendment Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts and by facsimile signature
or otherwise, and each of such counterparts shall be deemed an original and all of such counterparts together shall constitute
one and the same agreement.



 


[Signature page follows]


 


 



    	 



    	 



    

[Signature page to NVLT
Amendment Agreement]


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Agreement is executed as of the date first set forth above.


 


	NOVELOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Harry S. Palmin	 
	 	Name: Harry S. Palmin
	 	Title:	 
	 	 	 
	RODMAN & RENSHAW, LLC
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ John Borer	 
	 	Name: John Borer	 
	 	Title: Sr. Managing Director