e 7 ; _ '~ 'T/-- °- I-,

C lo+L4s( Aa<^he 4<& ^ ^e^slu, C e^Nr>/

/#ir -t CvAd ior^ 0 h /f

fi^^ 1E-217 J

k';~~AA\K,, ,:.::o , .7- . :

a ho 9 -7 S T -- 

E)L, I( .2 .. a'^ .. L _

R- 0q O3 V6/G- /

<>Xv, 3./ /

KV ^^Ys.z it/?--^^ _ v zJ /7 7 7 6-2n _ ___.

1e, _#I,_ j j^u -_ __A ZfUL_ 32f ___3

- G)/V) a5 2aZ -3 ---- -2 / -(

-CL rjtlJCj . r/

__, -- ¢ (,v - -Zi (A -

/V1A~z~l JfWU-L ACL (z)IL-9,3

J7 ) §<< /b (

54 vsk4-I C 4 UT ^

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14MM2 ~1·, 

I 

c I o+~ ~S 0voJ]tJ~~ 41\1& 12..~~{J.i!'v-f/~ f G.QAijre>. ( !1-i.,- COlVdr'i-'70rJl'~ 111.c.~+/-u') DR. c. -z /f~y 

~ 

RoOM.. 1£ -Uo 7 -

. _JhO~e..nD. 

j) 6' L 6.' I - (2)j)S'rfo 7!- J L . -.. --

" I .)0 -II. $ ~2)2J »~ -~q5? _______ . ____ .. _ 

/JtJc.- . dto/Jg&-l~ ___ ------

Jt~/)L . _ _ 4/J /] 77- o~ 2fL ____ _ 

---Ac£fE- ______________ ?-O~~21-- ~~---,-=73_ 

D~ olfc~._~J- ~v~ 5a3 31~-1.;?_~ _______ . 

)j-5t=- ;Zo~ s- 30 -- 2_?::LY_ 

!5VJV.rtl5,J(.]I«---> (PC; <liZ) q '2.-3, 2"-()- _Q~~~__ _ . 

rG'y ~ Lfi~ ~ 973 --QffJO 

Vti!/)6. . . ~d- ScfC~t1.(.;;_( .. _. 

!Dtq ({ e (ZIOZ.) 5?~" 916~ ~ ______ _ 

rXJ'l/ t"'"i :It:YL s?? \, nStjL_ 

It 0 L .C'ZtJ z.) _ 80 3 : ~~31 ______ . __ .... Do( (UoZ)5~b -o'}7( 

fi/ uJf/~C- CiD3) ~'22 -5"~ __ ~ L 

De 6' vlt ;10 ({}lJ7t 

AOL (2()1.-) gc, ~ -5 ~9~_ 

-0-0-1; ( ~e.. ;J. 0 J - 5""8 ~ - 7.1 ;I 8 

·DD E..- 'SbJ- .s~ Q0.l \ .. 

f)6f ~6 Ajfb~£7_7t: 

.. L I};VL. ----

'-1#G 

--. L.l/jv~ 

!-Ijj.}/....; 
R ^ ; -r/5y-v!TD^ -7 iL'-y

Proposed Agenda

Meeting Objectives:

* To clarify, amend and prioritize the list of issues informally raised by the advocates

* To provide, prior to the Public Workshop, the opportunity to present the Reverse

Engineering Analysis methodology.

* To review the assumptions that go into the Engineering, LCC and NES models and

to determine whether the assumptions are reasonable.

1. Introduction

2. Perceived Issues

3. Reverse Engineering Discussion and Spreadsheet Demo

4. Engineering Analysis Assumptions and Issues

5. LCC/NES Assumptions and Issues

6. Closure

24

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14MM2

Proposed Agenda 

Meeting Objectives: 

• To clarify, amend and prioritize the list of issues informally raised by the advocates 

• To provide, prior to the Public Workshop, the opportunity to present the Reverse 

Engineering Analysis methodology. 

• To review the assumptions that go into the Engineering, LCC and NES models and 

to determine whether the assumptions are reasonable. 

1. Introduction 

2. Perceived Issues 

3. Reverse Engineering Discussion and Spreadsheet Demo 

4. Engineering Analysis Assumptions and Issues 

5. LCCINES Assumptions and Issues 

6. Closure 
Issue ID Description Source

EA-1 Impact of emerging technologies on manufacturing cost: microchannel ACEEE,

hear exchangers NRDC

EA-2 EER vs. SEER NRDC

EA-3 Fixed expansion devices VEIC

LCC-1 Equipment life function: cold region operation ACEEE

LCC-2 RECS 97 data ACEEE

LCC-3 Time of Use Electricity Rates ACEEE

LCC-4 Blended standard based on commercial usage of residential equipment ACEEE

Q :\EE-431 \CAC\StandRul\ANOPR\ 12-9-99_wdrkshop\advocate_issues.wpd4

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14MM2

Issue ID Description Source 

EA-l Impact of emerging technologies on manufacturing cost: microchannel ACEEE, 

hear exchangers NRDC 

EA-2 EER vs. SEER NRDC 

EA-3 Fixed expansion devices VEIC 

LCC-l Equipment life function: cold region operation ACEEE 

LCC-2 RECS 97 data ACEEE 

LCC-3 Time of Use Electricity Rates ACEEE 

LCC-4 Blended standard based on commercial usage of residential equipment ACEEE 

Q:\EE-431 \CAC\StandRul\ANOPR\12-9-99 _ w6rkshop\advocate jssues.wpd4 
N %'-A -RWM. 1sr%-^ li 

Candidate Standard

Levels

* Candidate standard levels:

- SEER 11

- SEER 12

- SEER 13

* Maximum Technologically Feasible (approximately SEER

20 level)

*The Process Rule requires the Department to specify in the

ANOPR candidate standards levels, but not to propose a

particular standard.

*The Department intends to further consider and conduct

analyses for candidate standards levels in the SEER 11, 12 and

13 efficiency range.

·The Department intends to also conduct analyses for

equipment considered to be in the maximum technologically

feasible efficiency range of approximately SEER 20.

*The Department is interested in receiving comments on

alternative scenarios that would provide energy savings to the

Nation comparable to the savings that would be obtained by the

highest standards that are technologically feasible and

economically justified effective in 2006. Alternative scenarios

might include different efficiency levels combined with different

effective dates.

LV6K

EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14MM2

Candidate Standard 

Levels 

• Candidate standard levels: 

- SEER 11 

- SEER 12 

- SEER 13 

• Maximum Technologically Feasible (approximately SEER 

20 level) 

-The Process Rule requires the Department to specify in the 

ANOPR candidate standards levels, but not to propose a 

particular standard. 

-The Department intends to further consider and conduct 

analyses for candidate standards levels in the SEER 11, 12 and 

. 13 efficiency range. 

-The Department intends to also conduct analyses for 

equipment considered to be in the maximum technologically 

feasible efficiency range of approximately SEER 20. 

-The Department is interested in receiving comments on 

alternative scenarios that would provide energy savings to the 

Nation comparable to the savings that would be obtained by the 

highest standards that are technologically feasible and 

economically justified effective in 2006. Alternative scenarios 

might include different efficiency levels combined with different 

effective dates. 
EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 14MM2

Engineering Analy is Reverse Engineering Production Cost Results 

The result ar detailed production cost estimates for each equipment 

sample, aggregated across eight efficiency levels and four product classes. 

Reverse Engineering Re ults (7/11/99) -- Unitary 3-ton 

$1 ,300 

$1,200 Split Air Conditioner: 

$1 ,100 --+- -- Cased coil 

- $1 ,000 en --+- -- Fancoil 

0 

0 $900 

c: Split Heat Pump 

.2 $800 -0 

::::J 

"0 $700 0 

.... 

--- Packaged Air Conditioner 

----*- Packaged Heat Pump 

a. $600 

$500 

$400 

$300 

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 

Efficiency Level (SEER) 

Cost results by subassembly are available in the TSD and on the BTS 

website. 

WAS CAC EngAnalysis ANOPR wkshp