alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID 73457]

Deletion of Item From February 18, 2022 Open Meeting

February 17, 2022.
    The following item has been adopted by the Commission and deleted 
from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Friday, 
February 18, 2022, Open Meeting. This item was previously listed in the 
Commission's Sunshine Notice on Friday, February 11, 2022.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.......................................  MEDIA......................  Title: Updating Technical Rules for Radio
                                                                        Broadcasters (MB Docket No. 21-263).
                                                                       Summary: The Commission will consider a
                                                                        Report and Order to eliminate or amend
                                                                        outmoded or unnecessary broadcast
                                                                        technical rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04150 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0610 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0610

**2001/610/EC: Commission Decision of 18 July 2001 amending Decision 93/195/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 1953) **

*
Official Journal L 214 , 08/08/2001 P. 0045 - 0048 *

Commission Decision

of 18 July 2001

amending Decision 93/195/EEC on animal health conditions and veterinary certification for the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export

(notified under document number C(2001) 1953)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/610/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae(1), as last amended by Commission Decision 2001/298/EC(2), and in particular Article 19(ii) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In accordance with Commission Decision 93/195/EEC(3), as last amended by Decision 2001/144/EC(4), the re-entry of registered horses for racing, competition and cultural events after temporary export is restricted to horses kept for less than 30 days in any of the non-member countries listed in the same group in Annex II to that Decision.

(2) In order to make it easier for race horses originating in the Community to take part in International Group/Grade meetings in non-member countries listed in different groups, notably Australia, Canada, the United States of America, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore or United Arab Emirates, that period should be extended to less than 90 days and the restriction to countries of the same group should be withdrawn for race horses participating in such meetings.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 93/195/EEC is amended as follows:

1. An indent is added to Article 1 as follows: "- have taken part in International Group/Grade meetings in Australia, Canada, the United States of America, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore or the United Arab Emirates and meet the requirements laid down in a health certificate in accordance with the model set out in Annex VIII to this Decision."

2. The Annex to this Decision is added as Annex VIII.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 42.

(2) OJ L 102, 12.4.2001, p. 63.

(3) OJ L 86, 6.4.1993, p. 1.

(4) OJ L 53, 23.2.2001, p. 23.

ANNEX

"ANNEX VIII

>PIC FILE= "L_2001214EN.004603.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2001214EN.004701.TIF">

>PIC FILE= "L_2001214EN.004801.TIF">"
#### Johnson NAPITULPULU, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 13-71873, 14-71291

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017*

Filed July 7, 2017

Cindy Siuhuei Chang, Law Offices of Cindy S. Chang, Walnut, CA, for Petitioner

Kate Deboer Balaban, Esquire, Trial Attorney, Regina Byrd, Esquire, Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent'

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Johnson Napitulpulu, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of *618the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying his motions to reopen removal proceedings based on changed country conditions (No, 13-71873) and based on ineffective assistance of counsel (No. 14-71291). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, *Toufighi v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petitions for review.

As to No. 13-71873, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Napitulpu-lu’s motion to reopen where it was filed more than five years after the BIA’s final order, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Napitulpulu failed to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief he sought, *see Tou-fighi,*538 F.3d at 996 (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen based on changed country conditions for failure to establish a prima case); *Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1065 (9th Cir. 2009) (even under disfavored group analysis, petitioner must present some evidence of individualized risk).

As to No. 14-71291, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Napitulpu-lu’s motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel where it was filed more than six years after the BIA’s final order and was numerically-barred, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where Napitu-pulu failed to demonstrate that he acted with the due diligence required to warrant equitable tolling, *see Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (equitable tolling of time and numerical limitations on motions to reopen available where petitioner is prevented from filing due to deception, fraud or error, and exercises due diligence).

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### LEVU of Nu’uuli, Plaintiff v. TAGATA of Nu’uuli, Defendant TUA of Nu’uuli, Plaintiff v. TAGATA of Nu’uuli, Defendant

No. 5-1925

No. 8-1925

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Land: “Fale Malama” in Nu’uuli]

February 6, 1930

JAMES W. FOXALL, *President of the High Court;*LUTU and PELE, *Associate Members*

DECISION

And now, to wit, this 6th day of February A. D. 1930, all the testimony in the above case having been carefully considered, the Court is of the opinion

That Levu Taliililagi never had the full pule and authority of the family and land of the Levu;

That in any event he would have no right to give land which is the Tulaga Maota or residence of the Matai to anyone;

That probably the only reason Futi was suffered to occupy and use the land in question was because he was using the name Tagata, a name of the Levu family.

*422The decision of the Court therefore is, that the pule and authority of the land in question (viz: That portion of “FALE MALAMA” covered by the survey which extends from the center of the road running through the village of Nu’uuli and extending in a northwesterly direction, being that portion shown by said survey lying on the landward side of said road), is in the Matai Name Levu,

That said land be registered in the name of Levu,

That the Court costs be assessed at $75.00, payable as follows:

> $60.00 by Levu Fuatau

> $15.00 by Futi.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Aisha L. Wilkes, M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone (404) 639-6473,                         *AWilkes@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-04681 Filed 3-4-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
---

Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Timothy J. Turner, certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mogul Energy International, Inc.;
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.           The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and 15(d)-15(f) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 (a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)          evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)          disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.           The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2011
 
 /s/ Timothy J. Turner
 Timothy J. Turner
 President
 (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Lizzie Ward, as Administratrix of the Estate of Stanley C Ward, Appellant, *v.*New York State Electric & Gas Corporation, Respondent.

Argued March 9, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

*327
      *George A. King*and *A. J. Rodenbeck*for appellant.

*328
      *A. H. Harpending*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no testimony in this record to support a jury finding that defendant failed to comply with a definite notice or warning that the wires had to be removed before a fixed date. However, it was still a question of fact for the jury as to whether under all the circumstances defendant had reason to anticipate that the crane might come into contact with the wires and as to whether defendant’s failure thereafter to remove the wires was negligent.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Judgments reversed, etc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4634-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Colorado (FEMA-4634-DR), dated December 31, 2021, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued February 9, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Colorado is hereby amended to include permanent work under the Public Assistance program for the area determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of December 31, 2021.

Boulder County for permanent work [Categories C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2022-04588 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### W. BLACKLOCK, Plaintiff v. ALAFAIO and EDGAR REID, Defendants

No. 1-1907

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division

April 5, 1907

E. W. GURR, *Judge of the High Court*

ORDER OF INJUNCTION

The plaintiff in the above-entitled cause having commenced an action in this Court against the above named defendants, and having moved for an injunction against the said defendants, requiring them to refrain from certain acts in said complaint and hereinafter more particularly mentioned. On reading said complaint in said action and it satisfactorily appearing to me therefrom that it is a proper case for an injunction, and that sufficient grounds exist therefor, and the necessary undertaking having been given:

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED by me, Judge of the High Court, that until further order in the premises, you, the said Alafaio and the said Edgar Reid, and all your representatives, agents and all others acting in aid or assistance of you, and each and every one of you, do absolutely desist and refrain from encroaching on the property claimed by the said plaintiff.

Given under the hand and seal of the Court this 5th day of April in the year 1907.
#### Blackwell (Paymaster) *vs.*Irvin’s Administrators.

Assumpsit.

[Mr. Owsley for plaintiff: Mr. Turner and Mr. Breck for defendants,]

From the Circuit Court eor Madison County.

*June*10.

The paymaster of a regiment is entitled to the custody of its funds; and if the adrp’rs of a deceased paymaster refuse to pay over the balance that was in his hands, to his successor, upon proper demand, or the order of the Col, com’dt, they are liable to an action. Assumpsit will lie for such balance—tho’ the decedent may have given bond and security to account: the liability exists independent of the bond.

The dec’n in assumpsit should, regularly, allege a promise by the def’t *to the pit’f;*but an omission in that respect may not be fatal, as it will be intended that the promise was made to him from whom the consideration pro ceeded.

Judge Ewing

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Blackwell, as paymaster of the seventh regiment, Kentucky militia, sued Irvin’s administrators in assumpsit, for money alleged to have been received by Irvin, in his lifetime, as paymaster of the same regiment. The defendents demurred to the declaration, and pleaded nonassumpsit. The demurrer was joined, and sustained by thp Court; and the Plaintiff has appealed to this Court.

We have scrutinized the declaration, and are satisfied that it contains all necessary and appropriate averments, not only to show the liability of the defendants, but to show the plaintiff’s right of action. The law gives .to the paymaster for the time being the custody of the funds of the regiment, and on the refusal of his administrators to pay over the amount to his successor in office, on proper demand, or on the order of the colonel commandant, they are surely liable to an action.

Nor can we doubt, but that the action of assumpsit is maintainable, notwithstanding the execution of a bond by their intestate, with sureties, for the faithful discharge of his duties as paymaster. The bond does not *create*his liability, no more than it does in the case of sheriffs. But it *exists*independent of the bond. 1 Marshall, 296.

Though technically speaking, the promise should be charged to have been made by the defendants to the plaintiff, yet if the person to whom the promise be made be omitted, it has been said that, it will be intended that the promise was made to the person from whom the consideration proceeded. 1 Chilly, 331.

*188And it would require a less violent intendment, in this case, to construe the charge in the declaration, of *indebtedness*to the regiment, and a *promise to*pay, into a promise by implication, to the rightful keeper of the funds of the regiment, the plaintiff in the action.

It is therefore considered by the Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed, and the cause remanded, that the demurrer may be overruled.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DIAHANN D. KING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2562

[August 20, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; James W. McCann, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562015CF002488A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Diahann D. King, Brooksville, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### First National Bank of Whitehall, Respondent, *v.*James Lamb et al., Appellants. Same, Respondent, *v.*Same, Appellants.

These two cases were argued and decided with *First National Bank of Whitehall*v. *Lamb et al., (ante*p. 95).