alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12474-12475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4493-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 10 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-4493-DR), dated March 27, 
2020, and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on February 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, David 
Warrington, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Chad M. Gorman as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households in Presidentially

[[Page 12475]]

Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.


Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-04583 Filed 3-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### HAROLD v. THE STATE.

Appeal from Callahan county.

*Statute Construed.*— The conviction in this case was had under Article 694 of the penal code, which denounced as an offense the permitting of one having control of or owning sheep infected with *122scab, the herding or running at large of such sheep upon land not his own. But held, that said article was repealed by the act entitled, “An act for the protection of the wool-growing* interests of the state of Texas,” passed April *4,*1883. For rules of construction in such cases, see *21*Texas, 734. Reversed and dismissed.

Opinion by

Hurt, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.28
                            [LETTERHEAD OF AGENCY.COM]



                                                        January 26, 2000
Omnicom Finance Inc.
437 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10019


Gentlemen:

Reference is made to the Credit Agreement dated as of November 4, 1999 (the
"Credit Agreement") between Omnicom Finance Inc. as Lender and AGENCY.COM Ltd.
and Subsidiary Guarantors. Capitalized terms used herein without a definition
shall have the meaning assigned to such terms by the Credit Agreement.

We have agreed that the subsidiaries of AGENCY.COM located in France and
Denmark would not be required to become Subsidiary Guarantors under the Credit
Agreement. Rather, AGENCY.COM Holding A/S (formerly Visionik A/S), a
corporation organized under the laws of Denmark (and to the extent
applicable, its own wholly-owned subsidiaries) and SRC Localisation S.A. (to
be renamed AGENCY.COM: Paris S.A.), a corporation organized under the laws of
France, would be deemed to be "Unrestricted Subsidiaries" regardless of
whether they meet the definition thereof as set forth in Section 1.1
Notwithstanding the foregoing. AGENCY.COM shall pledge 65% of the shares of
capital stock of these subsidiaries to secure its borrowings under the Credit
Agreement.

It is further acknowledged that AGENCY.COM has exercised its right to
purchase the remaining equity capital of Pictoris Interactive S.A. ,a
corporation organized under the laws of France. It is intended that the
operations of Pictoris and SRC will be combined in a manner which has yet to
be determined. The resulting entity will also be deemed to be an
"Unrestricted Subsidiary" under the Credit Agreement regardless of whether it
meets the definition thereof as set forth in Section 1.1.

Please indicate your agreement by signing in the space provided below for
your signature.


                                                        Very truly yours,


                                                        AGENCY.COM LTD.


                                                        By:____________________


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

OMNICOM FINANCE INC.


By:_____________________
#### The People *ex rel.*Wm. T. Cagney, App’lt, v. Charles B. MacLean *et al.,*Com’rs, etc., Resp’ts.

*Louis J. Grant,*for app’lt; *David J. Dean,*for resp’ts.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Finch, J., absent.‘

Affirming 32 N. Y. State Rep., 844.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 692 

To amend the International Financial Institutions Act to provide instructions 

with respect to the U.S. policy on co-financing arrangements at the 

multilateral development banks, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2023 

Mr. TORRES of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the International Financial Institutions Act to 

provide instructions with respect to the U.S. policy on 

co-financing arrangements at the multilateral development banks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. U.S. POLICY ON CO-FINANCING ARRANGE4 MENTS AT THE MULTILATERAL DEVELOP5 MENT BANKS. 

6 Title XVI of the International Financial Institutions 

7 Act (22 U.S.C. 262p et seq.) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 692 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1634. U.S. POLICY ON CO-FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS 

2 AT THE MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT 

3 BANKS. 

4 ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the 

5 United States Executive Directors at the multilateral de6 velopment banks (as defined in section 1701(c)(4)) to use 

7 the voice and vote of the United States to vote against 

8 any program or project at the respective institution if it 

9 includes joint or parallel financing provided by the Asian 

10 Infrastructure Investment Bank unless the Secretary of 

11 the Treasury has certified to the Committee on Financial 

12 Services of the House of Representatives and the Com13 mittee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that the Asian 

14 Infrastructure Investment Bank— 

15 ‘‘(1) has the authority and the resources to pro16 vide grants and concessional assistance to countries 

17 eligible to borrow from the International Develop18 ment Association on terms similar to those provided 

19 to these countries by the International Development 

20 Association; and 

21 ‘‘(2) has demonstrated a track record of pro22 viding such assistance to these countries.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
ffi* South Coast

flTIIftI

Hil Air Quality Management District

21865 Copley Drive, Diamoncl Bar, CA 91765-4178

(9O9) 396-200O' www.aqmd.gov

August 12,20ll

Ms. Wienke Tax

U.S.EPA REGION 9

75 Hawthorne Street

Mail Code: AIR-2

San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: Correction to Table 6-12 Motor Vehicle Emissions

Dear Ms. Tax:

Upon review of the SCAQMD 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQNIP), staff has

noted a technical error in Table 6-12, Motor Vehicle Emissions (Summer Planning -Tons

Per Day). As listed in the table, the remaining VOC emissions (column four from the

left) for 202I and2022 read 88 and 85 TPD, respectively. The correct values of

remaining VOC for 2021 and2022 are 9I and 88 TPD, respectively. Please accept the

revisions to Table 6-12 (attached) that reflect the corrected values stated above.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,

9z^)-a--7

Elaine Chang, Dr.PH.

Deputy Executive Officer

Planning, Rule Development and Areas Sources

Attachment
Attachment

TABLE 6-12

Motor Vehicle Emissions

(Summer Planning - Tons Per Day)*

Year Baseline Remaining

VOC NOx VOC

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

20r0

20ll

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

360

341

321

302

273

243

214

199

186

176

166

157

148

142

r35

129

t24

119

rt4

ll0

t07

103

95

6tr

595

s79

563

518

472

441

419

379

3s5

331

309

287

269

250

232

216

200

184

176

r69

16l

t46

360

341

321

302

273

243

210

195

164

154

144

135

126

I19

113

109

101

96

93

8891

8s88

86

6tl

59s

579

563

518

472

438

413

330

291

252

219

r91

174

r62

160

135

r20

lt2

78

52

27

24

* Values shown in bold are results from model .uns, whii
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: March 17, 2016 107093

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM L. SMITH, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: February 16, 2016 Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant. Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Emilee B. Davenport of counsel), for respondent.

__________ McCarthy, J.P. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County (Hall Jr., J.), rendered August 27, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of arson in the second degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to arson in the second degree and his plea included a waiver of the right to appeal. Prior to sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea. County Court denied the motion and thereafter sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement to eight years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals. Contrary to defendant's contention, his waiver of the right-2- 107093

to appeal was valid. The record reflects that County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea, and defendant acknowledged that he signed the written waiver after conferring with counsel regarding its contents. Accordingly, defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Burritt, 127 AD3d 1433, 1434 [2015]). Defendant's remaining contention, that his sentence is harsh and excessive, is precluded by his valid appeal waiver (see People v Mayo, 130 AD3d 1099, 1100 [2015]; People v Almeida, 127 AD3d 1499, 1500 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1006 [2015]). Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
#### GILLISPIE v. THE STATE.

Appeal from Coleman county.

*Record*— Substitution—Practice.—It was error to substitute lost • papers other than the indictment without notice to the defendant. Such action by the court is either under the inherent power of the court, or under the provision of Art. 1475, R. S., and in either case notice to the defendant is necessary.

*Constitutional Law*— Indictment, —A doubt is expressed by the court as to whether a lost indictment can be legally substituted, and it is suggested to the state’s counsel to have a new indictment presented by the grand jury. Reversed and remanded.

Opinion by

Willson, J.
#### Walter D. Ludlum, Respondent, *v.*Kathryn E. Haskins et al., Respondents, and Marie T. West et al., Appellants.

Argued November 23,1943;

decided January 13, 1944.

*812
      *Egbert W. Doughty*for appellants.

*Clarence F. Corner*and *Gilbert F. Regan*for plaintiff-respondent.

*Benjamin Cohn*for defendants-respondents.

Costs and disbursements waived by all parties. Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
#### Charles W. Weeks, Appellant, *v.*Dyer D. S. Brown, Respondent.

(Argued November 21, 1872;

decided November 26, 1872.)

Decided upon the facts in the case.

*Amasa J. ParTcer*for the appellant.

*Ely & Husbands*for the respondent.

Geoveb, J.,

reads opinion for affirmance.

All concur; except Rapallo, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Scott SCHUTZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRN OF SAN DIEGO, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-55704

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 6, 2017* Pasadena, California

Filed July 10, 2017

Russell Clive Handy, Esquire, Mark D. Potter, Esquire, Potter Handy LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Jane A. Rheinheimer, Esquire, Rhein-heimer Smigliani, APC, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Christopher Chen-Hsin Wang, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division/Appellate Section, Washington, D.C, for Amicus Curiae United States of America

Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsid*627eration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.

VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.

BYBEE, Circuit Judge,

acquiescing dubitante:

I acquiesce *dubitante*for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in *Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC,*No. 15-55633.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6533 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require a Federal medical 

assistance percentage of 100 percent for urban Indian organizations, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. BACON, Mr. COLE, and Ms. DAVIDS of Kansas) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 

a Federal medical assistance percentage of 100 percent 

for urban Indian organizations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Urban Indian Health 

5 Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FULL FEDERAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PERCENT7 AGE FOR URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS. 

8 Section 1905(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1396d(b)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘by an Indian 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6533 IH

1 tribe or tribal organization (as defined in section 4 of the 

2 Indian Health Care Improvement Act)’’ the following: ‘‘, 

3 or through an urban Indian organization (as defined in 

4 section 4 of such Act) pursuant to a grant or contract 

5 with the Indian Health Service under the Indian Health 

6 Care Improvement Act’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04086]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[223A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Resumption of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement 
for the Proposed Coquille Indian Tribe Fee-to-Trust and Gaming Facility 
Project, Medford, Oregon; Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) published a notice in the 
Federal Register of December 27, 2021, that listed incorrect dates.

DATES: On December 22, 2021, the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs 
remanded the Tribe's application to the BIA to complete the 
environmental review process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bryan Mercier, Northwest Regional 
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Region, by mail: 911 
Northeast 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232-4165; or by telephone: 
(503) 231-6702. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, 
deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 27, 2021, in 86 FR 73313, on 
page 73313, in the second column, in the DATES section, on the first 
line, ``November 19, 2021'' should read, ``December 22, 2021''.
    In the same edition of the Federal Register, on page 73313, in the 
second column, in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, on line 
twelve, BIA included the sentence: ``On November 19, 2021, the 
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs withdrew the 2020 Denial and 
remanded the Tribe's application to the BIA to complete the 
environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy 
Act (NEPA).''
    BIA is replacing that language with this corrected sentence: ``On 
December 22, 2021, the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs withdrew the 
2020 Denial and remanded the Tribe's application to the BIA to complete 
the environmental review process under the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA).''
    Authority: This notice is published in accordance with sections 
1501.7 and 1506.6 of the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508) implementing the procedural 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321-4345 et seq.), and the Department of the 
Interior National Environmental Policy Act Regulations (43 CFR part 
46), and is in the exercise of authority delegated to the Assistant 
Secretary--Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2022-04086 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
#### Kenneth J. SCHIRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen CLARK, Sgt.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15266

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 21, 2017

Kenneth J. Schiro, Pro Se

John L. Ward, IV, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, AGNV—Nevada Office of the Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nevada state prisoner Kenneth J. Schiro appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims, including a due process violation in connection with a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion. *Garity v. APWU Nat'l Labor Org.,*828 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Schiro’s due process claim against defendant Clark because Schiro is collaterally estopped from relitigating issues relating to his April 7, 2008 disciplinary hearing that the Nevada courts resolved. *See Allen v. McCurry,*449 U.S. 90, 97-98, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980) (federal claim collaterally estopped by prior state court litigation); *Arduini v. Hart,*774 F.3d 622, 629 (9th Cir. 2014) (elements of issue preclusion under Nevada law).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Schiro’s motion to appoint counsel because Schiro did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances. *See Terrell v. Brewer,*935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991) (standard of review and requirements for appointment of counsel).

We do not consider the dismissal of Schiro’s other claims because Schiro does not raise any arguments about those claims in his opening brief. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[Arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s post-judgment order denying Schiro’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion because Schiro failed to file an amended or separate notice of appeal. *See Whitaker v. Garcetti,*486 F.3d 572, 585 (9th Cir. 2007) (appellant generally must file a separate notice of appeal or amend a previously filed notice of appeal to secure review of a post-judgment order).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6606 

AN ACT 

To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 relating 

to the statement of policy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6606 EH

1 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY. 

2 Section 1752(2) of the Export Control Reform Act 

3 of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4811(2)) is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following: 

5 ‘‘(H) To protect the trade secrets of the 

6 United States, its people, and its industrial 

7 base either related to items subject to control 

8 by the Secretary pursuant to this part or when 

9 the subject of economic espionage as described 

10 in section 1831 of title 18, United States 

11 Code.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6606 

AN ACT 

To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 

relating to the statement of policy.