alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6003 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6003

  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the inclusion of 
       medical debt on a consumer report, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2023

 Ms. Porter (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Doggett, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Norton, Ms. Scanlon, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Mullin, Mr. 
   Neguse, Ms. Tlaib, Ms. Chu, Ms. Meng, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mrs. 
 Foushee, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Spanberger, 
    Ms. Omar, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Pocan, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. 
   McGovern, and Ms. Lee of California) introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

            Referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the inclusion of 
       medical debt on a consumer report, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Debt Relief Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT.

    (a) Medical Debt Defined.--Section 603 of the Fair Credit Reporting 
Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(bb) Medical Debt.--The term `medical debt' means a debt related 
to, in whole or in part, transactions, accounts, or balances arising 
from the receipt of medical services, products, or devices.''.
    (b) Exclusion for Medical Debt.--Section 605(a) of the Fair Credit 
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681c(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(9) Any adverse information related to a medical debt, including 
a medical debt that was placed for collection, charged to profit or 
loss, or subjected to any similar action.''.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO PROHIBITIONS ON USE OF 
              MEDICAL DEBT INFORMATION.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``credit'' and 
``creditor'' have the meanings given those terms in section 702 of the 
Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691a).
    (b) Requirement.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 
Protection shall amend section 1022.30 of title 12, Code of Federal 
Regulations, or any successor regulation, to ensure that creditors are 
prohibited from obtaining or using information relating to the medical 
debt of a consumer in determining whether or not to extend credit to 
that consumer.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the City of New York, Appellant and Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for the Addition to the Public Beach, bounded by West 15th Street and Other Streets, in the Borough of Brooklyn. City Bank Farmers Trust Co., as Trustee, et al., Respondents and Appellants.

Argued October 8, 1943;

decided November 24, 1943.

*716
      *Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel (Reuben Levy*and *Julius Isaacs*of counsel), for City of New York, appellant-respondent.

*Emil N. Baar send. Herbert 8. Camitta*for Charles L. Feltman et al., respondents-appellants.

*Milton Loewe*for City Bank Farmers Trust Co., as Trustee, etc., respondent-appellant.

*Andrew F. Van Thun, Jr.,*and *Frank A. Kister*for West Tenth Street Realty Corporation, respondent-appellant.

*Charles Lamb, William A. Lamb*and *Walter L. Hopkins*for Roy J. Cook et ah, respondents-appellants.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lottghban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.
#### Howard N. Bailey, Resp’t, *v.*Simon Epstein *et al.,*App’lts.

*Abram Kling,*for resp’t; *E. Countryman,*for app’lts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 86 N. Y. State Rep., 83.
#### John A. Sopher, Resp’t, *v.*Gertrude W. Sargent, App’lt.

*(City Court of Brooklyn, General Term,*

*Filed April 27, 1891.)*

Trial—Exceptions.

Error cannot be predicated on an exception to a statement in a charge to the jury that certain questions were the only ones for them to determine, where the counsel in response to an inquiry stated that he did not think there was any question for the jury and made no request to submit any.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on verdict, and from order denying motion for a new trial.

*Horace*Graves, for resp’t; *George C.*Comstock, for app’lt

Van Wyck, J.

After the trial judge had charged the jury, the defendant’s counsel stated to the court that he wished to except to the charge wherein the court had stated the only questions for the jury to determine were whether or not the husband of defendant was authorized to sign the contract for her, and the value •of the services. When the court asked the counsel what other question there was, he answered he did not think there was any question for the jury, and made no request of the court to submit any other question to the jury. Upon such an exception no error can be predicated. The testimony was sufficient to carry' the case to the jury, and therefore the motion for a nonsuit was properly denied. We discern nothing in the testimony which' calls upon us to disturb the verdict as against the weight of evi-, dence. ,

Judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs.

Osborne, J., concurs.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6976 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 5, 2024 

Received 

MARCH 6, 2024 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

that aliens who have been convicted of or who have 

committed an offense for driving while intoxicated or 

impaired are inadmissible and deportable. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 6976 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Commu3 nities from DUIs Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY AND DEPORTABILITY RELATED 

5 TO DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR IM6 PAIRED. 

7 (a) INADMISSIBILITY.—Section 212(a)(2) of the Im8 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(J) DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR IM11 PAIRED.—Any alien who has been convicted of, 

12 who admits having committed, or who admits 

13 committing acts which constitute the essential 

14 elements of an offense for driving while intoxi15 cated or impaired, as those terms are defined 

16 under the law of the jurisdiction where the con17 viction, offense, or acts constituting the essen18 tial elements of the offense occurred (including 

19 an offense for driving while under the influence 

20 of or impaired by alcohol or drugs), without re21 gard to whether the conviction or offense is 

22 classified as a misdemeanor or felony under 

23 Federal, State, tribal, or local law, is inadmis24 sible.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

HR 6976 RFS

1 (b) DEPORTABILITY.—Section 237(a)(2) of the Im2 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(G) DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR IM5 PAIRED.—Any alien who has been convicted of 

6 an offense for driving while intoxicated or im7 paired, as those terms are defined under the 

8 law of the jurisdiction where the conviction oc9 curred (including a conviction for driving while 

10 under the influence of or impaired by alcohol or 

11 drugs), without regard to whether the convic12 tion is classified as a misdemeanor or felony 

13 under Federal, State, tribal, or local law, is de14 portable.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# EUR-Lex - 32001D0252 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32001D0252

**2001/252/EC: Commission Decision of 21 March 2001 amending Decision 98/424/EC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Maldives (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2001) 739) **

*
Official Journal L 091 , 31/03/2001 P. 0078 - 0080 *

Commission Decision

of 21 March 2001

amending Decision 98/424/EC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Maldives

(notified under document number C(2001) 739)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2001/252/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products(1), as last amended by Directive 97/79/EC(2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 1 of Commission Decision 98/424/EC of 30 June 1998 laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Maldives(3), states that the Department of Public Health (DPH) of the Ministry of Health shall be the competent authority in Maldives for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.

(2) Following a restructuring of the Maldives administration, the competent authority for health certificates for fishery products has changed of the Public Health Laboratory (PHL) of the Ministry of Health. This new authority is capable of effectively verifying the application of the laws in force. It is therefore necessary to modify the nomination of the competent authority mentioned in Decision 98/424/EC and the model health certificate included in Annex A to this Decision.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 98/424/EC shall be modified as follows:

1. Article 1 shall be replaced by the following:

"Article 1

The Public Health Laboratory (PHL) of the Ministry of Health shall be the competent authority in Maldives for verifiying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC."

2. Article 3(2) shall be replaced by the following:

"2. Certificates must bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the PHL and the latter's official stamp in a colour different from that of other endorsements."

3. Annex A shall be replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Decision shall come into effect 45 days after its publication on the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2001.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 15.

(2) OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 31.

(3) OJ L 190, 4.7.1998, p. 81.

ANNEX

"ANNEX A

>PIC FILE= "L_2001091EN.007903.EPS">

>PIC FILE= "L_2001091EN.008001.EPS">"
#### HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMAZON.COM, INC., AMZN Mobile LLC, AmazonFresh LLC, A9.Com, Inc., A9 Innovations LLC, Quidsi, Inc., Defendants-Appellees

2016-1906

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 19, 2017

Martin Richard Lueck, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Matthew L. Woods, Andrew Joseph Kabat, Shira T. Shapiro; Danielle Rosenthal, New York, NY.

David Benyacar, Arnold *&*Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Daniel Reisner, David Soofian.

(Newman, Dyk, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having-been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### John Consalus et al., Respondents, *v.*Thomas H. Maghee et al., Appellants.

(Argued November 21, 1872;

decided November 26, 1872.)

Decided upon the facts in the case; the court holding that various rulings as to rejection and reception of evidence claimed to be erroneous could not have affected the judgment.

*Charles Jones*for the appellants.

*F. F. Bulla/rd*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

Opinion for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit B**

**Tarot 680mm (ZYX -**  **M)** Frame: Tarot 680 Flight Controller: ZYX
- M
- 25 Motors: DJI 3508 Props: DJI1242 Battery : 8000mah 25c 6s ESCs: Castle Creations 35
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00363-CV

Broderick Darnell Jones

v.

Leslie Deases, Justice of the Peace, Pct. 1, San Patricio County, Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. S-23-5113CV-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed due to appellant’s 

inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 26, 2023
#### Jotham SIMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeremiah BEAM; H. Eric Cohoon; The City of Myrtle Beach, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7054

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 2017

Decided: April 17, 2017

Jotham Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jotham Simmons, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) and *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 394-95, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Simmons v. Beam,*No. 4:15-cv-03401-RBH, 2016 WL 4035457 (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*

*

**We have jurisdiction over the appeal because Simmons cannot cure by mere amendment the defect identified in his complaint. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015) (discussing *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993)).
#### Belle E. Sommerich, Respondent, *v.*Joseph B. Miller, Individually and as Trustee of Series N-69 of New York Title and Mortgage Company, Appellant.

Argued November 29, 1943;

decided January 6, 1944.

*770
      *Reid A. .Curtis*for appellant.

*Seymour J. Wilner*and *Walter M. Weis*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thachek, JJ.
Exhibit 23  -- Consent of Experts


Beckstead and Watts, LLP
----------------------------

Certified Public Accountants
                                                        3340 Wynn Road, Suite B
                                                            Las Vegas, NV 89102
                                                                   702.257.1984
                                                               702.362.0540 fax





To Whom It May Concern:

We have issued our report dated  March  18,  2003,  accompanying  the financial
statements of EClic, Inc. on Form 10KSB for the year ended December  31,  2002.
We  hereby  consent  to the incorporation by reference of said report of EClic,
Inc. on Form 10KSB.

Signed,

/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP
----------------------------
    Beckstead and Watts, LLP


March 18, 2003





<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-965]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Lyndra 
Therapeutics

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Lyndra Therapeutics has applied to be registered as an 
importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to 
Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before March 28, 2022. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before March 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a 
hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: 
Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All 
requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, 
Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, 
Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this 
is notice that on January 13, 2022, Lyndra Therapeutics, 65 Grove 
Street, Suite 301, Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, applied to be 
registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of 
controlled substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methadone..............................     9250  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to develop the formulation and process, and then 
manufacture the finished oral dosage form for use in preclinical and 
human clinical trials and analysis. No other activity for this drug 
code is authorized for this registration.
    Approval of permit applications will occur only when the 
registrant's business activity is consistent with what is authorized 
under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import 
of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non-approved finished 
dosage forms for commercial sale.

Matthew J. Strait,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-04061 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| | (a) | this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the three months ended December 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger Etess Chief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
February 14, 2011


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### SERVED: AUGUST 11, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

. - -_,..._ '-
.. l InThe Matter Of: ) ) ) ) ) ) .:.i
.. ;**~~** -· ....**~** -<. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION Respondent DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813
CaseNo. 2012EA150022


### ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnAugust 4, 2015, an Order Setting a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and Directing the Parties to Confer and File a Rule 26(f) Proposed Discovery Plan was filed. Among other things, this Order required the parties to file a proposed scheduling/discovery planon or before October 27, 2015, and set a Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for November 3, 2015. OnAugust 10,2015,the parties filed ajointNotice ofWithdrawal stating that "JetBlue hereby withdraws its Request for a Hearing and Answer to the Complaint" andthe "FAAhereby withdraws its Complaint." After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The October 27, 2015 deadline for the parties to file a proposed scheduling/ discovery plan is cancelled. 2. The Rule 16 Litigation scheduling Conference set for November 3, 2015, is cancelled. 3. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the parties have withdrawn theirrespective pleadings, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Mr. Christian Lewerenz 

### Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY

Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Steven Raffaele 

### Respondent's Counsel HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 31 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 TEL: 212-513-3200 FAX: 212-385-9010 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.