alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                              |                                       |                                                          |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:               November 14, 2005  | By:                              | /s/ Mark              R. Newburg                         |
|                                              |                                       |                                                               |
|                                              |                                       | Mark              R. Newburg                                  |
|                                              | Title:                           | President,              Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer |
|                                              | (Principal              Executive Officer) |
|                                              |                                       |

|                                                |                                         |                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:                 November 14, 2005  | By:                                | /s/ Arnaldo                F. Galassi           |
|                                                |                                         |                                                      |
|                                                |                                         | Arnaldo                F. Galassi                    |
|                                                | Title:                             | Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |
|                                                | (Principal                Financial Officer) |
|                                                |                                         |
|                                                |                                         |

----
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of China
Agri-Business, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 (the “Report”) that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  April 15, 2010
              /s/ Xiaolong ZhouXiaolong ZhouChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6412 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6412

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 
          the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2016

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to require oil polluters to pay 
          the full cost of oil spills, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Big Oil Bailout Prevention Unlimited 
Liability Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITS ON LIABILITY FOR OFFSHORE FACILITIES.

    Section 1004(a)(3) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 
2704(a)(3)) is amended by striking ``plus $75,000,000'' and inserting 
``and the liability of the responsible party under section 1002''.
                                 <all>
```
January 18,2013

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE SHELBYVILLE MUNICIPALAIRPORT 3529 NORTH, 100 WEST SHELBYVILLE, INDIANA 46176

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 To Whom ItMay Concern: (317) 392-1284
DARRELL SHRADER President SHERRY SHRADER Secretary

Shelbyville Aviation, Inc. would like to petitionthe Federal Aviation Administration for exemption from 14 CFR Part 120 Shelbyville Aviation requests to allowjust one ofthe two existing FAA approved Drug and Alcohol programs to cover both the part. 135 and part 91.147 operations for a small family company with only two employees. Currently, Shelbyville Aviation maintains Anti Drug and Alcohol programs for two separate operations Part 135 On-Demand Air Charter 

## * * Part 91.147 Passenger Carrying Scenic Flight Tour Operations At this time we have ourpilot and our maintenance director enrolled in each program. The reliefwe seek is acceptance ofcombiningthe drug and alcohol program for the 91.147 operationwiththe Part 135 program in order to avoid redundant effort and expense. Havingto maintain two separate programs is costly to us as a small business, both in testing and monthly maintenance costs through our consortium. This would also relieve us from having a DERfor bo!h programs. Webelieve that having justone program for the pilot and our maintenance director will streamline operations for our Anti-drug and Alcohol program manager makingthe management and**imple11;1e~tation** more efficient. Reducing our cost helps us maintain the lowestpossible rates for our services, as well as minimizes the effortthat the FAA must expendmanaging our drug and alcohol program. Both are in the public interest. Public safety shall not be compromised; the program will not change as all safety sensitive employees will continue to be enrolled and subject to the same program rules as they currently are. Benefits to the public will be to eliminate redundancy,**the~efore** decreasing costs to the taxpayer. Our small family company has**been)~** operation more than twenty-five years with no accidents or drug/alcohol issues. J• Ifyou require further details,**pleaseLc~:mtact** me eitherbyphone or email. P.!. Sincerely,

# A~4~ ,,,- '


### ... 

# -· ' !**~** • 

### ,.. Sherry G. Shrader Phone: 317-392-1284 Email: sgshrader@comcast.net
'l ) 

# . Instruction • 

# Rental 

# • Charter
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.5

ARTICLE 5
LEGEND
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
STOLT-NIELSEN S.A. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
LEGEND
MULTIPLIER  1,000


<Table>
<S>                                                <C>
PERIOD-TYPE                                        12 MOS
FISCAL-YEAR-END                                    NOV-30-2001
PERIOD-START                                       DEC-01-2000
PERIOD-END                                         NOV-30-2001
CASH                                                  24,865
SECURITIES                                                 0
RECEIVABLES                                          566,628
ALLOWANCES                                            15,174
INVENTORY                                            186,695
CURRENT-ASSETS                                       954,816
PP&E                                               3,771,900
DEPRECIATION                                       1,260,187
TOTAL-ASSETS                                       3,971,874
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                                1,105,814
BONDS                                              1,275,755
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                        0
PREFERRED                                                  0
COMMON                                                62,607
OTHER-SE                                           1,038,015
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                         3,971,874
SALES                                                      0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                     2,678,416
CGS                                                        0
TOTAL-COSTS                                        2,326,580
OTHER-EXPENSES                                             0
LOSS-PROVISION                                             0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                     119,155
INCOME-PRETAX                                         51,253
INCOME-TAX                                            27,561
INCOME-CONTINUING                                     23,692
DISCONTINUED                                               0
EXTRAORDINARY                                              0
CHANGES                                                    0
NET-INCOME                                            23,692
EPS-BASIC                                               0.43
EPS-DILUTED                                             0.43
</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, David Hallonquist, President and Chief Executive Officer of Play LA Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Play LA Inc. for the year ended  December  31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Play LA Inc.





Dated:  October 16, 2012




/s/ David Halloquist





David Hallonquist





President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.2

                            SCHOOLWEB SYSTEMS INC.
                        #280-815 West Hastings Street
                           Vancouver, BC  V6C 1B4
                            Phone: (604) 608-2540
                             Fax: (604) 608-8775


June 29, 2001


Advanced Interactive Inc.
718-1350 East Flamingo Road
Las Vegas, Nevada  89119

Attention:  Karim Lakhani

-and-

Advanced Interactive Canada Inc.
2101-1177 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, BC  V6E 2K3

Attention:  Harry K. Davis

Dear Sirs:

Re: License Agreement dated January 1, 2001 (the "Agreement")

This letter is written to confirm as follows:

1.  The license agreement dated January 1, 2001 (the
"Agreement") between Advanced Interactive Inc. ("AII Nevada"),
Advanced Interactive Canada Inc. ("AII Canada") and SchoolWeb
Systems Inc. (formerly Alternet Systems Inc.) ("SchoolWeb")
states, in Section 5.1(c), that SchoolWeb shall issue shares to
AII Nevada for the license as follows:

     "Also, in consideration of the license granted, and on
     execution of this Agreement, Alternet will issue to AII
     Nevada the greater of 2,000,000 of its common shares,
     or an amount equal to 25% of Alternet's totally issued
     and outstanding common shares at the date of execution
     of this Agreement."

2.  The Agreement is hereby amended such that the amount of
shares which are granted is:

     "Also, in consideration of the license granted, and on
     execution of this Agreement, Alternet will issue to AII
     Nevada 2,500,000 of its common shares."

3.  In all other ways, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.

If this accurately describes your understanding of our agreement,
please so indicate by signing below and returning a copy of this
letter to our offices at (604) 608-8775.

Upon execution hereof, this letter becomes an amendment to the
Agreement binding upon its terms.

Yours truly,

SCHOOLWEB SYSTEMS INC.

/s/ Patrick Fitzsimmons
Patrick Fitzsimmons, Director


The terms of the Agreement above are hereby read, understood,
acknowledged and accepted by the undersigned effective the 29th
day of June, 2001.


ADVANCED INTERACTIVE INC.
By Its Authorized Signatory


/s/ Karim Lakhani
Karim Lakhani, President and Director


ADVANCED INTERACTIVE CANADA INC.
By Its Authorized Signatory

/s/ Harry Davis
Harry Davis, President and Director
#### Lee Wayne HUNT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gary JONES, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7472

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2017

Decided: July 6, 2017

Mary Sheehan Pollard, NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INC., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, HI, Peter Andrew Regulski, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*724PER CURIAM:

Lee Wayne Hunt seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of . appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certifícate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hunt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hunt’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ARMANDO MONROYPERDOMO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70435

Agency No. A088-889-834

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Armando Monroy-Perdomo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-70435

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional challenges

to removal orders, Lopez-Rodriguez v. Mukasey, 536 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.

2008), and review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand,

Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition

for review. 

Even assuming that the allegedly unlawful search of Monroy-Perdomo’s

residence and his subsequent arrest was an egregious violation of his constitutional

rights, the agency did not err in concluding that there was substantial independent

evidence in the record to establish that he was nonetheless subject to removal as

charged. See Hoonsilapa v. INS, 575 F.2d 735, 738 (9th Cir. 1978), modified by

586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978) (“[T]he mere fact that a Fourth Amendment illegality

directs attention to a particular suspect does not require exclusion of evidence

subsequently unearthed from independent sources.”)

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Monroy-Perdomo’s motion

to remand to apply for voluntary departure, where he had the opportunity to apply

for voluntary departure before the IJ and he did not claim that ineffective

assistance of counsel prevented him from applying. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1);

Magallanes-Damian v. INS, 783 F.2d 931, 934 (9th Cir. 1986) (“petitioners are
3 12-70435

generally bound by the conduct of their attorneys, including admissions made by

them, absent egregious circumstances.”)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7025 

To extend and authorize annual appropriations for the United States 

Commission on International Religious Freedom through fiscal year 2026. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. 

CUELLAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend and authorize annual appropriations for the 

United States Commission on International Religious 

Freedom through fiscal year 2026. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Commis5 sion on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization 

6 Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 7025 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL 

2 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

4 207(a) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 

5 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2023 

6 and 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 and 2026’’. 

7 (b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.—Section 209 of 

8 the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 

9 U.S.C. 6436) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 

10 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2026’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Brian CLAROS-BEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. T. SHARTLE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-16872

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2017 *

Filed July 17, 2017

Brian Claros-Bey, Pro Se

Dennis C. Bastron, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM ***

Brian Claros-Bey appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We review the denial of a section 2241 petition de novo, *see United States v. Lemoine,*546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

Claros-Bey was convicted in the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia. He was assessed $500 pursuant to the Victims of Violent Crime Compensation Act of 1996 (“WCCA”) and designated to serve his custodial sentence with United States Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Claros-Bey contends that the BOP lacks authority to collect, through its Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”), the $500 WCCA assessment. This claim is belied by the language of the applicable statutes and regulations. Regardless of how the WCA assessment is categorized under 28 C.F.R. § 545.11(a), the BOP is authorized to collect Claros-Bey’s WCCA assessment from wages earned during his period of incarceration. *See*D.C. Code § 24401(a) (any person incarcerated pursuant to the District of Columbia Official Code is in BOP custody and subject to BOP regulations); *id.*at § 4-516(a) (assessments made pursuant to the WCCA shall be paid from wages subsequently earned, including “in a facility of the Department of Corrections or elsewhere”). Moreover, contrary to Cla-ros-Bey’s contention, his participation in the IFRP is voluntary and “does not implicate [his] constitutional rights.” *See Lem-oine,*546 F.3d at 1049.-

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Jean Paul GAMARRA, Appellant v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, Appellee

No. 16-5323

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: January 25, 2017

Jean Paul Gamarra, Pro Se.

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office (USA), Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant on November 15, 2016, and the supplement thereto. See Fed. R. App, P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the notices filed by appellant, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order entered October 6, 2016 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed appellant’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that it is “ ‘patently insubstantial,’ presenting no federal question suitable for decision.” Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994)).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.