alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          124
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,415
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  29,485
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              0
<LOANS>                                      30,316
<ALLOWANCE>                                     274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               63,586
<DEPOSITS>                                   33,652
<SHORT-TERM>                                  7,150
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             317
<LONG-TERM>                                   9,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        106
<OTHER-SE>                                   12,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               63,586
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               1,753
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             1,426
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 80
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              3,259
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,868
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,391
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 669
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      669
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    478
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.01
<LOANS-NON>                                      12
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                249
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    12
<RECOVERIES>                                     37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               274
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            274
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-0342

LT Case No. 16-2020-CF-008854-AXXX

____________________________

JUSTINA LYNN WRIGHT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Victoria Rose Cordero, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

June 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, JAY, and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Elephant Talk
Communications,  Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"), for the period ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Russelle Choi,  President & Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  and Manu Ohri, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Russelle Choi
                                            ------------------------------------
Dated: March 28, 2003                       Russelle Choi
                                            President & Chief Executive Officer

                                            /s/ Manu Ohri
                                            ------------------------------------
Dated: March 28, 2003                       Manu Ohri
                                            Chief Financial Officer




























                                      99.1-1
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
ArthroCare Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2003 |  | 
|                         |  | 
|                         |  | 
|                         |  | 



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into
any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### Nicholas R. Acker, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Submitted May 22, 1872;

decided June 4, 1872.)

*A. P. Zaning*for the appellant.

*George W. Cothrom*for the respondent.

Agree to modify by reducing the recovery to one penalty and excess of fare paid by plaintiff, and as modified affirmed with costs in court below, but without costs to either party in this .court.

Judgment accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand  Exchange Commission on the datehereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partnerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 12,  2009                   |                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                            |                 |
|                                            |                 |
| By                                              | /s/ JUSTIN C.  FERRI |   |
| Justin  C. Ferri                                |                 |
| Chief Executive  Officer, President and Manager |                 |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)                  |                 |
|                                                 |                      |  |

 

----
1 Faulk, Scott (OST)

Subject: EAS at Beckley

From: Faulk, Scott (OST) Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:22 AM To: 'Beckley Airport Manager'; 'Beckley' Cc: Kelly Carbone ( KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com ); Dave Hackett < dhackett@gosunair.com > ( dhackett@gosunair.com ); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Subject: EAS at Beckley

Greetings All,

I would like to update you on the Esse ntial Air Service (EAS) situation at Beckley, and give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we su bmit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

As you know, by Order 2014-7-11, issued on July 18, 2014, th e Department re-solicited proposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS at Beckley for a new term. In response to our request, Charter Air Transport and Sun Air International submitted a proposals fo r consideration. I have at tached each air carrier’s proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and su bmit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than August 15 th . Please send your comments directly to scott.faulk@dot.gov . Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distri bution list. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Kind Regards, Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-9967
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BRIGHTCUBE, INC. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael F. Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Brightcube, Inc., certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: March 31, 2010





By: /s/Michael F. Manion


Michael F. Manion


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6333 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the limitation on reimbursement for emergency treatment of amounts owed to a third party or 

for which the veteran is responsible under a health-plan contract. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2023 

Mrs. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify the limitation on reimbursement for emergency treatment of 

amounts owed to a third party or for which the veteran 

is responsible under a health-plan contract. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Emergency 

5 Care Reimbursement Act of 2023’’. 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6333 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON REIMBURSE2 MENT FOR EMERGENCY TREATMENT OF 

3 AMOUNTS OWED TO A THIRD PARTY OR FOR 

4 WHICH THE VETERAN IS RESPONSIBLE 

5 UNDER A HEALTH-PLAN CONTRACT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1725(c)(4)(D) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘(i) The Secretary’’; 

10 (2) in clause (i), as designated by paragraph 

11 (1), by striking ‘‘or similar payment’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘of less than $100’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(ii) In this subparagraph, the term ‘copayment’ 

16 means a fixed amount paid by an individual for a covered 

17 health service received by the individual and does not in18 clude any amount paid for a deductible or coinsurance.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amend20 ments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 

21 any reimbursement claim under section 1725 of such title 

22 submitted to the Department of Veterans Affairs for 

23 emergency treatment furnished on or after February 1, 

24 2010, including any such claim submitted by a member 

25 of the certified class seeking relief in Wolfe v. McDonough, 

26 No. 18–6091 (U.S. Vet. App.). 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6333 IH

1 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

2 (1) The terms ‘‘emergency treatment’’ and 

3 ‘‘health-plan contract’’ have the meanings given 

4 those terms in section 1725(f) of title 38, United 

5 States Code. 

6 (2) The term ‘‘reimbursement claim’’ includes 

7 any claim by a veteran for reimbursement of a co8 payment, deductible, coinsurance, or any other type 

9 of cost share for emergency treatment furnished to 

10 the veteran in a non-Department of Veterans Affairs 

11 facility and made by a veteran who had coverage 

12 under a health-plan contract, including any claim for 

13 the reasonable value of emergency treatment that 

14 was rejected or denied by the Department of Vet15 erans Affairs, whether the rejection or denial was 

16 final or not. 

Æ 


dmwilson on DSKJM0X7X2PROD with BILLS
#### _ The People, App’lts, *v.*Thos. F. Wynn, Resp’t.

*McKenzie Semple,*ass’t dis’t att’y, for app’lts; *Wm. F. Howe,*for resp’t.

Judgment affirmed on opinion below. All concur, except Earl and Peckham, JJ., dissenting, and Finch, J., absent.

Affirming 35 N. Y. State Rep., 487.
#### In the Matter of Ruby P. Davis, Respondent, against Patrick Walsh, Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Comprising the Board of Trustees of the City of New York Fire Department Pension Fund, et al., Respondents, and Mary Hergenrother, Intervener, Appellant.

Argued May 19, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*893
      *H. H. Nordlinger, Leonard Lazarus*and *J. M. Dinnes*for appellant.

*Adelbert W. Bailey*and *Louis E. Cooper*for Ruby P. Davis, respondent.

*Robert H. Schaffer, Acting Corporation Counsel (Charles F. Murphy*and *William S. Lebwohl*of counsel), for Patrick Walsh, et al., respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Rippey and Conway, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145908

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145908

COA: 299518

Jackson CC: 09-006140-FC

LONNIE RICHARD MANNING,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### Dolores MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAVY LEAGUE OF the UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-56682

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 20, 2017

Dolores Martinez, Pro Se

Peter Hugh Crossin, Esquire, Attorney, Veatch Carlson, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dolores Martinez appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her diversity action seeking damages for negligence related to a trip and fall accident. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Colwell v. Bannister,*763 F.3d 1060, 1065 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Martinez failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant owed her a duty of care. *See Ortega v. Kmart Corp.,*26 Cal.4th 1200, 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 470, 36 P.3d 11, 14 (2001) (elements of a premises liability negligence claim under California law); *Sprecher v. Adamson Cos.,*30 Cal.3d 358, 178 Cal.Rptr. 783, 636 P.2d 1121, 1126 (1981) (“[T]he duty to take affirmative action for the protection of individuals coming upon the land is grounded in the possession of the premises and the attendant right to control and manage the premises.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Martinez’s motion for reconsideration because Martinez failed to establish grounds for such relief. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 1993) (standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)).

We reject as unsupported by the record Martinez’s contention that the district court was biased against her.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Chas. U. Wing, Resp’t, *v.*Belnado De La Rionda *et al.,*App’lts.

*Chas. H. Otis*and *Edward M. Shepard,*for resp’t; *Oliver J. Wells*and *G. E. Waldo,*for app’lts.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 37 N. Y. State Rep., 404.
#### Harris *v.*The State.

No. 13461.

September 25, 1940.

*Randall Evans Jr., Jack E. Evans, James R. Evans,*and *L. D. McGregor,*for plaintiff in error.

*Ellis G. Arnall, attorney-general, J. Cedi Davis, solicitor-general, C, E. Suttonf Duke Davist*and *C. E. Gregory,*contra.

Tenkins, Justice.

The defendant filed to his indictment for a capital felony a plea in abatement, attacking the qualifications and procedure of the grand jurors in the return of the indictment. After rulings striking certain portions of the plea on demurrer by the State, the issues of fact raised by the unstricken parts were tried by a special jury, which returned a verdict “ against the plea in abatement.” The defendant brought to this court a bill of exceptions assigning error on the refusal of a new trial from this verdict alone, and on exceptions pendente lite to the ruling on the plea. This procedure not presenting a case ■“of conviction of a capital felony” or any constitutional question such as under art. 6, sec. 2, par. 5, of the constitution (Code, § 2-3005), would give this court jurisdiction, the writ of error with its exceptions relating to the plea in abatement must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. See *Humphrey*v. *State,*175 *Ga.*666 (165 S. E. 587), and cit.; *Wilburn*v. *State,*140 *Ga.*138, 140 (78 S. E. 819); *Ruffin*v. *State,*151 *Ga.*743, 744 (108 S. E. 29); *Coleman*v. *George,*140 *Ga.*619 (2), 621 (79 S. E. 543); *Bashinski*v. *State,*123 *Ga.*508 (2), 510 (51 S. E. 499) ; *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Williams,*146 *Ga.*27 (90 S. E. 478); *McDow*v. *State,*113 *Ga.*699 (39 S. E. 295); *Boisclair*v. *State,*92 *Ga.*453 (17 S. E. 270). *Transferred.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6661 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6661

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to reauthorize 
                 rural cooperative development grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2023

  Ms. Caraveo (for herself and Mr. Valadao) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to reauthorize 
                 rural cooperative development grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Rural Cooperatives and 
Communities Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF RURAL COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT GRANTS.

    Section 310B(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act 
(7 U.S.C. 1932(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Cooperative development.--The term 
                `cooperative development' means activities including 
                outreach, education, training, and technical 
                assistance, to support the startup, expansion, or 
                ongoing sustainability of new and existing 
                cooperatives.'';
            (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting ``, and award maximum 
        points in scoring criteria to applicants that satisfy the 
        requirements of paragraph (5)(F),'' before ``if the plan'';
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking subparagraph (D) and 
        inserting the following:
                    ``(D) commit to providing technical assistance and 
                other services to socially vulnerable, underserved, or 
                distressed communities;'';
            (4) in paragraph (6)(B), by striking ``If the Secretary 
        determines it to be in the best interest of the program, the'' 
        and inserting ``The'';
            (5) in paragraph (10), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``The Secretary shall analyze the data resulting from the 
        research, and include the data and the analysis in the annual 
        report submitted by the interagency working group under 
        paragraph (12).'';
            (6) in paragraph (12), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
        this sentence and annually thereafter, the interagency working 
        group shall submit to the Congress a report describing the 
        activities carried out by the working group.''; and
            (7) in paragraph (13), by striking ``2014 through 2023'' 
        and inserting ``2024 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```