alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




Perficient,
      Inc.


Austin,
      Texas




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No. 333-100490, No. 333-116549, No. 333-117216, No. 333-123177 and No.
      333-129054) and Form S-8 (No. 333-42626, No. 333-44854, No. 333-75666, No.
      333-118839 and No. 333-130624) of Perficient, Inc. of our reports dated March
      1,
      2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness
      of
      Perficient, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in
      the
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2006.








/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Houston,
      Texas


March
      1,
      2007
#### Commonwealth *versus*Ezra Kellogg.

The commanding officer of a militia company cannot delegate the power of appointing a person to warn his men to appear at a company parade.

On the petition of S. W. Halsey, a private in a company ol militia, a writ of *certiorari*was issued to a justice of the peace, by whom Halsey had been fined for neglecting to meet with the company on the first Tuesday of May 1829. The judgment of the magistrate was alleged to be erroneous, because the order from the commanding officer to warn the company, was not directed to the person who warned them, but to the clerk of the company, authorizing him to issue his warrant to some suitable person in each school district to notify and warn, &c.

*Bishop,*for the Commonwealth,

referred to *St.*1809, *c.*108, § 18, which provides that the commanding officer of a company “ shall issue his orders to some one or more of the non-commissioned officers or privates of his company, requiring him or them to notify the men belonging to his company to appear,” &c.

*Whiting, contra,*

cited *Commonwealth v. Cutter,*8 Mass. R. 279 ; *Commonwealth*v. Derby, 13 Mass. R. 433.

The *Court*

held, that the commanding officer of the company had no right to delegate the power of appointing a person to warn the company, and the proceedings were therelore quashed 1

1

 See Revised Stat. e. 12, § 88.
#### Albert C. Smith, App’lt, *v.*Herbert J. Fowler, Resp’t.

Appeal from order vacating attachment.

*A. M. & G. Gard,*for app’lt; *M. H. Herschberg,*for resp’t.

Pratt, J.

The allegations-upon which the attachment was granted were so answered and explained by defendant that the dissolution of the attachment was proper. Not only was it made plain that there was no reason to apprehend defendant would dispose of his property to defraud his creditors, but some doubt exists as to the good faith of the original application. And much of the property taken possession of by the sheriff was exempt.

The order vacating attachment is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Dykman, J., concurs.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6781 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6781

To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine Debris Program 
        of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2023

   Ms. Bonamici (for herself and Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
    and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural 
 Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Marine Debris Act to reauthorize the Marine Debris Program 
        of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MARINE DEBRIS PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL 
              OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 9(a) of the Marine Debris Act (33 U.S.C. 1958(a)) is 
amended by striking ``for'' the first place it appears and all that 
follows through ``carrying out'' and inserting ``for each of fiscal 
years 2018 through 2028 for carrying out''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

M.L.C.,

Petitioner

v.

B.B.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 18 WM 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of April, 2015, the Application for Le ave to File Original

Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,734
<SECURITIES>                                    30,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (740)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,145
<PP&E>                                          10,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,742)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,076
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,979)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,945
<SALES>                                         37,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,939
<CGS>                                           10,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,193
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       557
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,362)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.45)


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.01

                     RULE 13A-14(a)/15D-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert M. Alderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004

By /s/ ROBERT M. ALDERMAN
   ----------------------
Robert M. Alderman
Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       17
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, George T. Sharp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Hunt Global Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hunt Global Resources, Inc.  By: /s/ George T. Sharp George T. Sharp Chief Executive Officer  April 15, 2011
#### Philip B. Thompson, Jr., Resp’t, v. The Knickerbocker Ice Co., App’lt.

*Jno. J. Adams,*for resp’t; *Albert Stickney,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 25 N. Y. State Rep., 581.
#### Ophelia J. Cuthbert, Resp’t, v. Margaret S. Ives, Impl’d, App’lt.

*W. H. Page, Jr.,*for resp’t; *Robt. Sewell*and *C. Fine,*for app’lt.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur, except Finch, J., absent.

See 38 N. Y. State Rep., 1018.
#### In the Matter of Marie Toyos, Respondent, against Henry E. Bruckman et al., Constituting the New York State Liquor Authority, Appellants.

Argued October 19, 1943;

decided December 2, 1943.

*746■ *Frederick A. Sperling*and *Flvin N. Edwards*for appellants..

*Harold J. Hinman*and *Leonard Farbstein*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs on the ground that the order of the Appellate Division does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
Exhibit 32
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Victor Salerno, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc. for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Wagering, Inc.
 By:             /s/ Victor Salerno
 Name:         Victor Salerno
  Title:            Chief Executive Officer

Date:June 9, 2004
 
 I, Timothy F. Lockinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of American Wagering, Inc. for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Wagering, Inc.
  By:              /s/ Timothy F. Lockinger
 Name:         Timothy F. Lockinger
 Title:            Chief Financial Officer
 Date:            June 9, 2004
  
 1
Exhibit 12.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Nachum Falek, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F/A of AudioCodes Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal controls.



Date: September 22, 2004





/s/ NACHUM FALEK



Nachum Falek

Vice President Finance and

Chief Financial Officer







| |  | 
| |  |
#### Robert Blume, by his Guardian ad Litem, William F. Blume, Appellant, *v.*City of Newburgh, Respondent.

Argued October 18, 1943;

decided December 2, 1943.

*740
      *Henry Hunter*for appellant.

*Hiram B. Odell, Jr., Corporation Counsel,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Division of Aeronautics 3483 Rickenbacker Street

•Boise ID 83705 December 11, 2015 Byron K. Huffman, Acting Director FAA -Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 800 Independence Ave., SW Washington,
DC 20591 Dear Byron:

(208) 334-8775 itd.idaho.gov/aero All of the Idaho State Aviation fuel taxes (6 cents/gal. jet fuel,
7 cents/gal. avgas) goto support the Division of Aeronautics. None of the money goes to;the State General Fund, or general support of lTD, orthe lTD Director, or anything similar. All aviation fuel tax revenuecollected

is used by the Aeronautics Division for: •Administrative costs, •Aeronautics Advisory Board travel and meeting expenses, •General aviation search and rescue operations, •Aviation safety

& education programs, •State-owned and operated airport maintenance programs, • Airport planning, • Matching
of FAA grantstolocal entities There

is anIdaho state aircraft operation that is financed by a chargeback system from the usersand thus self-supported. Based onthat above structure here in Idaho,

I amconfident that the State of Idaho complies with the rules of the FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue. If you require anyadditional information please contact meat myoffice. * MichaelS. Pape Administrator Idaho Division of Aeronautics 3483 Rickenbacker Boise,ID83705 208-334-8788 office 208-830-9624 mobile
Exhibit 99.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mary M. Ebele, Principal Financial Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:     /s/Mary M. Ebele                                   Dated: May 14, 2004
        ----------------
        Mary M. Ebele
Title:  Principal Financial Officer



                                       19
Exhibit 99.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2005, as filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John F. Olmstead, President and Director of CAI Equipment Leasing
V Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Partnership.


By:      /s/ John F. Olmstead                          Dated:  November 14, 2005
         --------------------
         John F. Olmstead
Title:   President and Director




                                       18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,936,878
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,857,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    613,388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      44,975,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,383,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,339,680
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,383,580
<SALES>                                         34,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,132,972
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,599,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               235,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                75,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             588,058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,533,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,533,081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,533,081
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.03


</TABLE>
#### Albert A. Raphael, Appellant, *v.*New York State Realty and Terminal Company et al., Respondents.

Argued June 14, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*552
      *Edward R. Finch*and *Edward Kurland*for appellant.

*Gerald E. Dtvyer, Clive C. Handy*and *Edward R. Bruml'ey*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thachee, JJ.