alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,977,996
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,766,123
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 50,460,734
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    281,475,653
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,753,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             357,894,600
<DEPOSITS>                                 260,651,576
<SHORT-TERM>                                25,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,738,331
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,744,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,220,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             357,894,600
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,574,150
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,526,727
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            18,100,877
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,165,869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,825,408
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,275,469
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              61,564
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,339,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,949,962
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,949,962
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,219,142
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                    503,354
<LOANS-PAST>                                    28,199
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,676,438
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   21,040
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,982
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,753,380
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,753,380
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 1971-134]

On October 8, 2021, Idaho Power Company filed an application to amend the license for the Hells Canyon Hydroelectric Project No. 1971 (FERC No. 1971). The Hells Canyon Project is located on the Snake River in Adams and Washington counties, Idaho and in Wallowa, Malheur, and Baker counties, Oregon. The project occupies federal lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (Payette and Wallowa Whitman National Forests and Hells Canyon National Recreational Area).

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on November 4, 2021, Commission staff issued a notice that the application was accepted for filing and soliticed comments, motions to intervene and protests. Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the notice, staff does not anticipate that amending the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to amend the Hells Canyon Project.

The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties.

                    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Jennifer Polardino at (202) 502-6437 or                     *jennifer.polardino@ferc.gov.*

      ( print page 11422)    
Dated: February 23, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-04250 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 10.1

 

EXECUTION COPY

 

AMENDMENT

TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2009 (the “Agreement”), by and between HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HCC”), and John N. Molbeck, Jr. (“Executive”) is made and entered into as of May 15, 2012.  HCC and Executive are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”. All capitalized terms, not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Agreement.

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Parties set forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with HCC in the Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement to delete certain provisions relating to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, HCC and Executive hereby agree as follows:

 

AGREEMENT

 

1.                                      Effective as of May 15, 2012, Section 19(d) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety.

 

2.                                      The provisions of Section 1 of this Amendment are hereby incorporated into and made part of the Agreement as if fully set forth therein.

 

3.                                      Except as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged, and as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.

 

4.                                      This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth below.

                                                                                                                                                 

 

	
EXECUTIVE:
    	
 
    	
HCC:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
HCC   Insurance Holdings, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   John N. Molbeck, Jr.
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Christopher J.B. Williams
    
	
John   N. Molbeck, Jr.
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Christopher   J.B. Williams
    
	
Date:
    	
May 15,   2012
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
President
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Date:
    	
May 15,   2012
    	
 
    


 

Signature Page – Amendment to Employment Agreement
#### Mary E. McCowan, Resp’t, v. John Sullivan *et al.,*App’lts.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 27, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00175-CV BRIDGET PARSON AKA BRIDGE T BROWN PARSON, Appellant
V. BECKY COLE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01563-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Partida-Kipness Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant, a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order, filed this appeal without an order from the local admini strative judge granting her permission to appeal. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. §§ 11.101, 11.102. Accordingly, we directed appellant to file a copy of the order granting her permission. See id. § 11.1035(b). Although we cauti oned appellant that failure to comply within ten days would result in dismissal of the appeal wit hout further notice, more than ten days–2– have passed and appellant has not responded. See id. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal. See id.

210175F.P05 /David J. Schenck / DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

BRIDGET PARSON AKA BRIDGET BROWN PARSON, Appellant
No. 05-21-00175-CV V. BECKY COLE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-01563- B. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Osborne and Partida-Kipness participating.
In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered January 27, 2022.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

1 1 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

Deidre Taber 

Official Court Reporter 

Fergus County Courthouse 

712 West Main St. 

Lewistown, MT 59457 

(406) 535-1081 

MONTANA, TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, FERGUS COUNTY 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DAVID ALLEN PEIN, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: DC 23-15 

ORDER 

Upon reading the Affidavit of Deidre Taber, Official Court Reporter, for an extension of time of 

time to transmit the record, and good cause having been shown: 

IT IS HEREI3Y ORDERED that the Appellant shall have 50 additional days in which to transmit 

the record in this case or until September 24th, 2024. 

DATED this a(4„ day of July, 2024. 

roxA-4.A4:-

NICKOLAS C. MURNION 

JUDGE 

Copies e-mailed to: Attorney Theresa Diekhans 

Attorney Alex Jacobi 

Hon. Nickolas C. Murnion 

FILED

STATE OF MONTANA

By: __________________

CLERK

176.00 Fergus County District Court Brenda Snapp DC-14-2023-0000015-IN 07/26/2024 Phyllis D. Smith Murnion, Nickolas C.

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0387
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 3.151

                            ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION

                                       OF

                     HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC

      The undersigned, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 608 of the Florida
Statutes, for the purpose of forming a limited liability company under the laws
of the State of Florida, hereby adopts the following Articles of Organization.

                                ARTICLE I - NAME

      The name of the limited liability company is Healthcare Revenue Recovery
Group, LLC (the "Company").

                              ARTICLE II - ADDRESS

      The mailing address and the street address of the principal office of the
Company is:

                               1801 NW 66th Avenue
                                   Suite 200A
                              Plantation, FL 33313

                   ARTICLE III - REGISTERED AGENT AND ADDRESS

      The name of the Registered Agent for the Company is Corporation Service
Company and its street address is as follows:

                                1201 Hays Street
                         Tallahassee, Florida 32301-2525

                             ARTICLE IV - MANAGEMENT

      The Company shall be managed by one or more managers and is, therefore, a
manager-managed company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these Articles of
Organization on this ______ day of December, 2004



                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John R. Stair
<PAGE>
                   STATEMENT OF ACCEPTANCE OF REGISTERED AGENT

         The undersigned, being the corporation named in the Articles of
Organization of Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC, as the Registered Agent
of this limited liability company, hereby consents to and accepts the
appointment as Registered Agent of the Company and agrees to act in such
capacity. The undersigned further agrees to company with the provisions of all
statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of the undersigned's
duties as Registered Agent. The undersigned states that it is familiar with and
accepts the responsibilities and obligations of its position as the Registered
Agent of the Company, as provided for in Chapter 608, Florida Statues.

                                                     Corporation Service Company

                                                     By:________________________
                                                     Its:_______________________
#### In the Matter of Lawyers Mortgage Company. Brentmore Estates, Inc., et al., Appellants; Louis H. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator of Lawyers Mortgage Company, Respondent. Reorganization Managers op Lawyers Mortgage Company.

Submitted November 15, 1943;

decided November 24, 1943.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 291 N. Y. 615.)
#### Marquita SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Marian BOULWARE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7414

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 28, 2017

Decided: August 17, 2017

Cameron Jane Blazer, BLAZER LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellant. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marquita Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § -2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00461-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 236-309611-19

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE METROPLEX, LLC D/B/A METROPLEX CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP 

RAM FIAT LLC, AND CLARENCE FOSTER AND DANIEL WHITE,

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF METROPLEX CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP 

RAM FIAT LLC., Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 8, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,555
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    625,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,036,977
<PP&E>                                         116,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,179,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          537,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,452,718
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,771,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,179,688
<SALES>                                      1,245,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,245,338
<CGS>                                          756,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  652,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (164,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (164,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (164,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with Annual Report of WPCS International Incorporated (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Heater,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------













Date:
                July 27, 2006
            By:*/s/ JOSEPH HEATER*
              
              Joseph
                HeaterChief
                Financial Officer
#### Metropolitan Savings Bank, Respondent, *v.*Friend L. Tuttle, as Surviving Executor and Trustee under the Will of Angelo Ubriaco, Deceased, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Submitted July 20, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

Motion by respondent for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 290 N. Y. 497.)
#### Frederick Lange, Resp’t, v Peter Kearney, App’lt.

*Hathaway & Montgomery,*for resp’t; *Edward F. O’Dwyer,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 21 N. Y. State Rep., 262.
#### Griffith v. The Chicago, Burlington & Pacific Railroad Company *et al.*

Railroads : authority or president. The president of a railroad company has no power, by virtue of his office simply, to let a contract in behalf of the company for the construction of its road, when the same is already under contract made by its board of directors. *(Templin v. Chicago, B. & P. Ry. Co.,*73 Iowa, 548, *followed.)*

*86*Appeal from, Jefferson Circuit Court.*

Filed, March 9, 1888.

This is an action in equity to recover a balance alleged to be due the plaintiff for work done by him in the construction of a railroad, and to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the property. The circuit court entered judgment dismissing the petition, and plaintiff appeals.

*Jones &*Fuller, for appellant.

Coolci6 *Clements*and *R. A. SanJcep,*for appellees.

Reed, J.

Plaintiff claims to have done the work under a contract with the New Sharon, Coal Yalley *&*Eastern Railroad Company, the agreement being entered into on the part of the corporation by S. C. Cook, its president. The name of the corporation was subsequently changed to the Chicago, Burlington & Pacific Railroad Company. The evidence shows that the work was in fact done under a contract entered into by plaintiff with Cook ; but defendants claim that the latter was acting for the Trunk Line Construction Company, and that consequently plaintiff was a subcontractor. If that claim is true, it is conceded that plaintiff cannot recover as against these defendants, for the reason that he did not take the steps requisite to preserve his lien as against .them. The evidence leaves little doubt, we think, but that plaintiff understood, when he entered into the contract with Cook, that the latter was representing the railroad company ; and if Cook had been clothed with power to contract for that company, it probably would have been bound by the contract. But there is no evidence that he had that power, and it is shown that the board of directors of the company had already entered into a contract with another person for the performance of the same work, and that that contract had been transferred to the Trunk Line Construction Company, which company has been paid for the *87work. The case, in its facts, is like *Templin v. Chicago, B. & P. Ry. Co., 73*Iowa, 548, in which we held that the president of a railroad company does not have power, by virtue of his office merely, to bind the company by a contract for the construction of its railroad. That holding is conclusive of the rights of these parties.

Affirmed.