alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             86
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            722
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0   
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0   
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    30,269
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0   
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                        30,534
<ALLOWANCE>                                       294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 63,890
<DEPOSITS>                                     32,451
<SHORT-TERM>                                   11,200
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               436
<LONG-TERM>                                     5,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          106
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 63,890
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,211
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 860
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   87
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,158
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,196
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             962
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   494
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        150
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.11
<LOANS-NON>                                       109
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   21
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  284
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      11
<RECOVERIES>                                       21
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 294
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              294
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0
        


</TABLE>
#### Michele Russo, Appellant, *v.*Thomas Crimmins Contracting Co., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Submitted April 16, 1943;

decided May 27, 1943.

*800
      *Charles Glatzer*for appellant.

*John V. Downey, James B. McNally*and *Samuel Rudykoff*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

' Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of drugstore.com, inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert A. Barton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    ROBERT A.
BARTONRobert A. BartonChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to drugstore.com, inc. and will be retained by drugstore.com, inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March 12, 2004
Exhibit
10.50







May 22,
2008








Joseph A.
Heater


109
Brookhollow Drive


Downingtown,
PA 19335





Re: Amendment to Employment
Agreement








Dear
Joe,





As
Chairman of the Executive Committee of the WPCS International Incorporated Board
of Directors, I wish to inform you that the committee has duly executed a
resolution to increase your compensation. This letter shall serve as an
amendment to the employment agreement effective June 1, 2005 between Employee
and Employer (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. Section 5 of the
Agreement is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety with the
following:


___





5. Compensation of Heater. As
compensation for the services provided by Heater under this Paragraph, the
Company shall pay Heater an annual salary of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($250,000) to be paid in accordance with the Company’s usual payroll procedures.
In addition to the above base compensation, Heater shall be eligible to receive
bonuses based on the performance of the Company.


___





The
foregoing amendment shall be effective as of June 1, 2008. Please confirm your
acceptance by signing below.








Respectfully,







/s/ Norm
      DumbroffNorm
    DumbroffChairman of the
      Executive CommitteeBoard of
      DirectorsWPCS International
      Incorporated







Accepted
and agreed to this the 22ndday of May
2008.







/s/ Joseph A.
      HeaterJoseph
      A. Heater
#### Juan Carlos Rodriguez MIRANDA Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70813

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

Filed October 2, 2017

James B. Rudolph, Esquire, Attorney, Rudolph, Baker & Associates, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner

OIL, Lindsay Corliss, DOJ'—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, *492Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Rodriguez Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order, and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a continuance. *Ahmed v. Holder,*569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand, and review de novo constitutional claims. *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 921, 923 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez Miranda’s request for an eighth continuance where he did not demonstrate good cause. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.29, 1003.31(c); *Ahmed,*569 F.3d at 1012 (listing factors to consider). It follows that Rodriguez Miranda’s due process claim fails for lack of error. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez Miranda’s motion to remand based on ineffective assistance of counsel, where Rodriguez Miranda did not show that any deficiency in his former counsel’s performance accounted for his failure to timely file an application for relief. *See Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 793 (9th Cir. 2005) (to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel, petitioner .must show counsel failed to perform with sufficient competence).

We reject Rodriguez Miranda’s contentions that the agency failed to consider relevant evidence or insufficiently explained its decisions. *See Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency need not write an exegesis on every contention); *Fernandez v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner did not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6633 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9355 113th Street in Seminole, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan Christian Knauss Memorial Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6633 EH

1 SECTION 1. ARMY SSG RYAN CHRISTIAN KNAUSS MEMO2 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 9355 113th Street in Seminole, 

5 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army SSG 

6 Ryan Christian Knauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan 

11 Christian Knauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6633 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostKnauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. nole, Florida, as the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan Christian al Service located at 9355 113th Street in Semi-
#### SCOTT CIAK *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 19544)

Spear, Mihalakos and Dranginis, Js.

Argued May 8

officially released June 5, 2001

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose ARANDA, AKA Vicious, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-50534

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 9, 2017 Pasadena, California

Filed July 17, 2017

*667Tara K. McGrath, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Fred Sheppard, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee ■

John Paul Balazs, Attorney, Law Offices of John P. Balazs, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LIPEZ,* BEA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The. Honorable Kermit V. Lipez, United States Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Aranda pleaded guilty to a conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)), a drug trafficking conspiracy (21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846), and discharge of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence and drug trafficking crime (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)). We have jurisdiction of Aranda’s appeal of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291.1

The government concedes that the district court erred in applying a discharge of firearm enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2), because Aranda was also sentenced for discharging a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). *See United States v. Aquino,*242 F.3d 859, 863-65 (9th Cir. 2001). We agree, and therefore vacate Aranda’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing on an open record. *See United States v. Matthews,*278 F.3d 880, 885-86 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc).

VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Aranda's appeal was consolidated with the appeals of four codefendants: Jesus Barragan (No. 13-50516), Hector Fernandez (No. 13-50518), Francisco Gutierrez (No. 13-50525), and Pablo Franco (No. 13-50531). These appeals remain pending.
EXHIBIT 99.12 VIA EDGAR  TO: United States Securities and Exchange Commission  Re: Asanko Gold Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 40-F Consent of Expert This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report), as filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Companys Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2014 (the Annual Information Form). I, Doug Heher, DO HEREBY CONSENT, to:  · the use of my name and the disclosure of my involvement in the preparation of information that forms the basis for disclosure of a technical and scientific nature related to the Companys Asanko Gold Mine Project, contained in the Annual Information Form, and  · the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such information in the Annual Report.  Dated March 16, 2015   // Doug HeherDoug Heher
B.Sc Eng (Mechanical), Pr Eng.
DRA Mineral Projects (Pty) Ltd.
Unassociated Document


 



ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE







THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF LEASE (this “Assignment”) is made this 24th   day of May 2012 by Pershing Gold Corporation, formerly Sagebrush Gold Ltd. (“Pershing”) and Arttor Gold LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pershing (“Arttor Gold” and, together with Pershing, the “Assignors”), to Noble Effort Gold, another wholly owned subsidiary of Pershing (“Assignee”).


 



RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Centerra (US) Inc. (“Lessor”) owns an undivided interest in those certain 24 RRC unpatented lode mining claims located in Lander County, Nevada, which unpatented mining claims are more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the


“Mining Property");




 


WHEREAS, Centerra leased the Mining Property to the Assignors pursuant to a Mining Lease dated August 22, 2011 (the “Lease”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and







WHEREAS, the Assignors wish to assign the Lease to Assignee, and Assignee has agreed to accept such assignment, on the terms and conditions contained herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Assignment.  Assignors, as of the date hereof, assign, transfer and convey to Assignee all of Assignors’ right, title and interest in and to the Lease.







 



	
  

	
2.

	
Assumption.  Assignee accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes the Lease and all obligations of Assignors thereunder as of the date hereof.







 



	
  

	
3.

	
Indemnity.  Assignee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Assignors from and against all loss, cost, liability and expense arising out of or in connection with the Lease after the date hereof.













	
  

	
4.

	
Entire Agreement.  This Assignment contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect of the transactions described herein. There are no restrictions, promises, representations and warranties, covenants or undertakings as to such transactions other than those expressly set forth or referred to herein or in such other agreements dated the date hereof, and this Agreement together with such others supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect thereto.












 


[signature page follows]


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


 



	  	
ASSIGNORS:


 


PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION


 


By:_____________________________


Name: Stephen Alfers


Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


ARTTOR GOLD LLC


 


By:_____________________________


Name: David Rector


Title: Manager


 


 


ASSIGNEE:


 


NOBLE EFFORT GOLD LLC


 


By:_____________________________


Name: David Rector


Title: Manager


 


 


	
Acknowledged and Accepted:


 


 


CENTERA (US) INC.


 


By:_____________________________


Name:_____________________________


Title:_____________________________
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 15

                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
NCS HealthCare, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NCS
HealthCare, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 1996, and the
related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and
six-month periods ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended December
31, 1996 and 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical review procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements 
referred to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of NCS HealthCare, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996, and the consolidated statements of income,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented
herein, and in our report dated August 2, 1996, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of June 30, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.




Cleveland, Ohio                                  /s/   Ernst & Young LLP
February 14, 1997



                                      13
ArthroCare, Corporation

DO NOT DESTROY THIS NOTE: When paid, this note, with Deed of Trust
securing same, must be surrendered to Trustee before reconveyance will
be made.


NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST
STRAIGHT NOTE


$350,000

Sunnyvale, California


May 1, 1999




For value received, John Tighe and Susie Tighe, husband and wife
(payor/trustor)  and promises to pay to ArthroCare Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (payee/beneficiary), or order, at place designated
by payee,  the principal sum of  three hundred fifty thousand dollars
($350,000), together with interest from N/A on the unpaid principal
hereof from the date hereof at the rate of zero percent (0%) per annum,
payable upon the earlier of (1) following a sale or transfer of the
property securing this note or any interest therein (2) twelve months
following the termination by ArthroCare Corporation of John Tighe's
employment with ArthroCare (3) twelve months following the sale of
ArthroCare Corporation by merger, reorganization or sale of
substantially all assets or (4) upon the termination by John Tighe of
his employment with ArthroCare.

Principal, interest, and all other sums which may become due in
connection with this note and the deed of trust security same, shall be
payable in lawful money of the United States of America.  Should default
be made in any payment when due, the whole sum of principal and interest
shall become immediately due at the option of the holder of this note.
If action be instituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum as the
Court may fix as attorney's fees.

The Deed of Trust securing this note contains the following provision:
In the event the herein described property or any part hereof, or any
interest therein is sold agreed to be sold, conveyed or alienated by the
Trustor, or by the operation of law or otherwise, all obligations
secured by this instrument, irrespective of the maturity dates expressed
therein, at the option of the holder hereof and without demand or notice
shall immediately become due and payable.  This note is secured by a
DEED OF TRUST to ArthroCare Corporation, a Delaware corporation as
Trustee.




        _______________________________
                                                        John Tighe


        _______________________________
                                                        Susie Tighe
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**ANDPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of American Wagering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposesof Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, to myknowledge, that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

 

A signed original of this written statement, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 
| Date:  September 20,  2010 |   | /s/  Victor J. Salerno                                                        |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |   | Victor  J. Salerno                                                            |
|                                      |   | President,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer,                 |
|                                      |   | Chairman  of the Board of Directors, and Interim Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                      |   | (Principal  Executive and Financial Officer)                                  |

 

----