alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         251,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  261,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    910,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,474,634
<PP&E>                                         130,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,626,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          633,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,452,718
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,822,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,626,240
<SALES>                                      1,134,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,134,521
<CGS>                                          553,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  791,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (210,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (211,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (211,380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### LAUNIU and TALAEAI, Plaintiffs v. TAFISI, Defendant

No. 32-1918

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [“Matai” name: “Maiava”]

December 3, 1918

A. M. NOBLE, *Associate Judge*

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the Court that the matters in controversy have been amicably settled between the plaintiffs and defendant, it is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged that the action be dismissed.

It is further ordered, considered and adjudged that the defendant Tafisi is entitled to register himself under the “matai” name “Maiava”. Plaintiffs pay cost of action $10.00.
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Inns & Hotels
Management Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Huiping Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 24, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Huiping Yan        
|Name:  |  | Huiping Yan            
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAMES HARDING,

Petitioner

v.

SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 14 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process and Motion for Leave to Amend are GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-165927 on Form S-3, No. 333-128488 and No. 333-158232 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 29, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of WPCS International Incorporated and Subsidiaries as of April 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the years then ended, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of WPCS International Incorporated and Subsidiaries for the year ended April 30, 2011.





By:
/s/ J.H. Cohn LLPJ.H. Cohn LLPEatontown, New Jersey

July 29, 2011
#### BLALOCK *v.*WEBB *et al.*

No. 13437.

September 25, 1940.

*770*A. S. Olay, Mitchell & Mitchell,*and Hwsch, *Smith &*Kilpatriclc, for plaintiff.

*Vvrlyn B. Moore Jr.3*and Crenshaw, *Hansell d*Gunby, for defendants.

Duckworth, Justice.

A controlling question presented by the record is whether or not the devise in the will constitutes color of *771title which will ripen by prescription when adverse possession has been held thereunder for the statutory period of seven years. Code, § 85-407. A solution of this question involves in the present case a determination of the incidental question as to whether the legatees can hold adversely to the grantee in a security deed previously executed by their testator. It is obvious that if the devise is color of title, bona fide possession thereunder for a period of seven years will ripen into perfect title as against every one. The very purpose of the law in providing for prescriptive title is to extinguish the claims of all others in the land. If such adverse possession ripened into title that was good only as against those having no claim to the land, the law would be useless and could serve no purpose. The manifest purpose of the law is to' establish title that is good against all legal and legitimate rights and title formerly held by others, but forfeited by reason of adverse possession. Whether such rights be founded upon a mere lien such as a mortgage, upon title for a limited purpose such as a security deed, or upon an absolute and unconditional title, malíes no difference. This is not an unfair or harsh rule of law. Those having an interest are given seven years in which to act to protect their interest. The statute puts them on notice in advance of the result if they fail to act. Thus it is seen that where title is acquired by prescription, those having an interest which is forfeited have virtually sanctioned the forfeiture and have aided in the establishment of prescriptive title by their inaction. In *Harriss*v. Howard, 126 *Ga. 325 (2)*(55 S. E. 59), this court said: *“A*devise of land under a will duly recorded may give color of title.” Then, in *Caraker*v. Brown, 152 *Ga.*677 (111 S. E. 51), this court held that a devise under a will was color of title, and that the legatees thereunder could hold adversely to the grantee of their testator. This court in that case went further than the facts in the present case require us to go. It was there held that the executor, the legatee, and the grantee of the legatee could all hold adversely to a grantee of the testator; and it was held that the possession of the executor could be tacked to that of the vendee of the devisee, to make out the necessary period of prescription. It follows that the defendant legatee and heirs of legatees in the present case, who the evidence shows knew nothing of the existence of the plaintiff’s claim until the present suit was filed, and who have held possession of the premises in*772volved under the devise for more than seven years, acquired title by prescription, and that the evidence demanded the verdict in their favor. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**ANNUAL
        STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**
 **OFFICER'S
        CERTIFICATE**
  Re:
                J.P.
                Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage
                Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-CIBC17.
  In
                accordance with Section 11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
                (the
“Agreement”) dated November 28, 2006, executed by and between J.P. Morgan Chase
                Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. (as “Depositor”), Wells Fargo Bank,
                National Association (as “Master Servicer“), LNR Partners, Inc. (as “Special
                Servicer”), and LaSalle Bank National Association (as "Trustee" and “Paying
                Agent"), as authorized officer of the Master Servicer I certify that
                (A) a
                review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
                calendar
                year or portion thereof and of the performance of the Master Servicer
                under this
                Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and (B) to the best of
                such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
                fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material
                respects
                throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a
                failure to
                fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each
                such
                failure known to such officer and the nature and status
                thereof.
  Wells
        Fargo Bank, National Association
 “Master
        Servicer"
  /s/
        James
        B. Scanlon
  James
        B.
        Scanlon
 Vice
        President
 Wells
        Fargo Bank National Association
 
 March
        2007 -755
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Republic Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, William R. Klich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2)    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 7, 2003



|/s/ William R. Klich                    
|----------------------------------------
|William R. Klich Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF NEXTEL PARTNERS, INC.


Nextel Partners Operating Corp., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned
subsidiary of Nextel Partners, Inc.)

Nextel WIP Lease Corp., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of
Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)

Nextel Partners of Upstate New York, Inc., a Delaware corporation (a wholly
owned subsidiary of Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)

NPCR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Nextel Partners
Operating Corp.)

NPFC, Inc., a Nevada corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Nextel Partners
Operating Corp.)

Nextel WIP License Corp., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of
Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)

Nextel Partners Equipment Corp., a Nevada corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary
of Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)

Nextel WIP Expansion Corp., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of
Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)

Nextel WIP Expansion Two Corp., a Delaware corporation (a wholly owned
subsidiary of Nextel Partners Operating Corp.)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6589 

To require a report on terrorist financing in the Americas, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2023 

Ms. DE LA CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require a report on terrorist financing in the Americas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent the Financing 

5 of Terrorism Through the Drug Trade Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON TERRORIST FINANCING IN THE AMER7 ICAS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6589 IH

1 Treasury shall submit to Congress a report that includes 

2 the following: 

3 (1) An analysis of the major money making 

4 sources for terrorist financing by Hamas and 

5 Hezbollah in Mexico, Central America, South Amer6 ica, and the Caribbean. 

7 (2) An analysis of the amount of money held by 

8 Hamas and Hezbollah in Mexico, Central America, 

9 South America, and the Caribbean, including an 

10 identification of the countries in which it is being 

11 held. 

12 (3) An analysis of the extent to which Hamas 

13 and Hezbollah are linked to drug trafficking organi14 zations in Mexico, Central America, South America, 

15 and the Caribbean and an analysis of the amount of 

16 their funds raised through the narcotics trade. 

17 (4) A description of United States and multilat18 eral efforts to disrupt financing by Hamas and 

19 Hezbollah in Mexico, Central America, South Amer20 ica, and the Caribbean. 

21 (5) An evaluation of the United States efforts 

22 to disrupt financial flows from Mexico, Central 

23 America, South America, and the Caribbean to 

24 Hamas and Hezbollah. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6589 IH

1 (b) NATIONAL TERRORIST FINANCING RISK ASSESS2 MENT REPORT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall, in 

3 the next National Terrorist Financing Risk Assessment 

4 report issued by the Department of the Treasury on or 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act— 

6 (1) identify Hamas as a ‘‘Primary Threat’’ 

7 under the report’s section relating to ‘‘Threats’’; and 

8 (2) include a full description of Hamas’s activi9 ties relating to terrorist financing under such sec10 tion. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Elizabeth J. Osborne, Resp’t, v. The New York Mutual Ins. Co., App’lt.

*Joseph A. Shoudy,*for resp’t; *Geo. A. Black,*for

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 25 N. Y. State Rep., 719.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 680 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on the deduction for State and local taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2023 

Ms. SHERRILL (for herself, Mr. LAWLER, Ms. NORTON, and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on the deduction for State and local taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Relief for Middle 

5 Class Families Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR 

7 STATE AND LOCAL TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 164(b)(6)(B) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$10,000 ($5,000 in the case of a married individual filing 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 680 IH

1 a separate return)’’ and inserting ‘‘$100,000 (twice such 

2 amount in the case of a joint return)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statement.
</LEGEND>

 <MULTIPLIER>                                  1


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         5,572,678
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,844,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    7,877,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,696,446
<PP&E>                                         79,482
<DEPRECIATION>                                 42,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,278,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,718,957
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    590
<COMMON>                                       491
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,563,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,278,144
<SALES>                                        19,643,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,643,941
<CGS>                                          17,656,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,656,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                252,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                   116,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            136,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02



</TABLE>
#### Ronald Craig FISH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-73389

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 17, 2017 * San Francisco, California

Filed October 19, 2017

*656Ronald Craig Fish, Pro Se

Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Nathaniel S. Pollock, Attorney, Douglas Campbell Rennie, Attorney, Francesca Ugolini, Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Robert R. Di Trolio, Esquire, Clerk, U.S. Tax Court, Washington, DC, William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: IKUTA and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MCSHANE,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Ronald Craig Fish deducted losses sustained in his individual retirement account (“IRA”) on his 2009 tax return. The IRS disallowed the deduction, determined a deficiency, and imposed an accuracy-related penalty under I.R.C. § 6662. The Tax Court sustained the deficiency and the penalty. We have jurisdiction over Fish’s appeal of the Tax Court judgment under I.R.C. § 7482(a)(1) and affirm.

The only issue on appeal is whether Fish may deduct unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”) losses sustained by two partnerships held in an IRA from his personal taxable income.1 Although IRAs are generally tax-exempt, they are “subject to the taxes imposed by section 511” on UBTI of organizations in which they invest. I.R.C. § 408(e)(1); see I.R.C. § 511. The Tax Code provides that UBTI losses may be carried forward or backward to deduct against gains within an IRA. *See*I.R.C. § 512(b)(6); *see also*Treas. Reg. § 1.512(b)-(1)(e)(1) (“The net operating loss deduction provided in section 172 shall be allowed in computing unrelated business taxable income.”). But, the Code does not provide for the pass-through of UBTI losses to an IRA beneficiary’s personal tax return. *See*I.R.C. §§ 511-13. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate fpr publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because Fish does not "clearly and distinctly” challenge the accuracy-related penalty in his opening brief, that issue is waived. *See Avila v. L.A. Police Dep’t,*758 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted).
EXHIBIT 10.7 LETTER OF INTENT AMENDMENT

   
 Exhibit 10.7
  
 APD Antiquities, Inc.
 1314 South Grand Blvd, Suite 2-250
 Spokane, WA 99202
 Phone: (509) 744-8590
 

 

 March 30, 2012
 

 Mr. Martin Clemets, Managing Member
 Northern Adventures, LLC
 1028 East Larch Street
 Osburn, Idaho 83849
 

 RE:  Extension of Due Date of Promissory Notes.
 

 Dear Mr. Clemets:
  
 This letter confirms that APD Antiquities, Inc.  ("APD"), a Nevada corporation, through its subsidiary to be formed APD Metals, Inc. (APDM”) hereby agrees to extend the due date of the various promissory notes from March 31, 2012 to June 30, 2012. 
 

 If the foregoing accurately sets forth your understanding, please sign both copies of this letter in the space provided.
 

 

 Very truly yours,
 

 Agreed and accepted this 30th day of March, 2012
 

 Place: Spokane, Washington on March 30, 2012
 

 

 _________________________
 Cindy K. Swank, President
 APD Antiquities, Inc.
 

 Place: Osburn, Idaho on March 30, 2012
 

 

 

 _________________________
 Martin Clemets, a Managing Member
 Northern Adventures, LLC