# Patent

## Title
Methods and compositions for treating prostate cancer

## Abstract

Treatment of prostate cancer by regional and prolonged release of one or more nucleotide-based RNAi agents is provided.

## Background
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
Benefit is claimed to U.S. Provisional Application 61/629,135, filed Nov. 14, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


FIELD
Treatment of prostate cancer by regional and prolonged release of one or more nucleotide-based RNAi agents is provided.
BACKGROUND
Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is cancer that starts in the prostate gland. It is the third most common cause of death from cancer in men of all ages and is the most common cause of death from cancer in men over age 75. Prostate cancer is rarely found in men younger than 40. Systemic chemotherapy is often ineffective in the treatment of prostate-confined cancer. In-vivo results from regional delivery of chemotherapy in prostate cancer (1) show potential higher efficiency in tumor arrest but still have major issues to be solved. Chemotherapy treatment requires large drug amounts, having toxicity comparable to the recommended dose of 60 to 80 mg/m2 for intravenous administration. One general cause of anticancer drug resistance is the limited ability of drugs to penetrate tumor tissue and to reach all of the tumor cells in a potentially lethal concentration (2). Extravasation and interstitial transport (via diffusion and convection) are diminished in the intratumoral space by high interstitial pressure, hypovascularity, high tumor cell density and/or a large stroma fraction; these problems are more serious in larger, bulky tumors. Chemotherapy drugs are more effective against proliferating vs. quiescent cells; thus, slowly proliferating cells at greater distances from tumor blood vessels are likely to be resistant to therapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs also are typically inefficient against tumor stem cells.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a protein produced by cells of the prostate gland, whose level is reported as nanograms of PSA per milliliter (ng/mL) in the blood. While a PSA level below 4.0 ng/mL was previously considered normal, one large study showed the presence of prostate cancer in 15.2 percent of men with a PSA level of ≦4.0 ng/mL (2), 15% percent of whom (approximately 2.3 percent overall) had high-grade cancers. In another study, only 25-35 percent of men with PSA level between 4.1-9.9 ng/mL and who underwent a prostate biopsy had prostate cancer. Thus, there is no specific normal or abnormal PSA level, particularly since factors such as inflammation (e.g., prostatitis) and variation between laboratories can cause a PSA level fluctuations. In general, however, higher PSA levels correlate with higher probabilities of cancer.
The Gleason grading system is widely used in prostate cancer. It is determined by summing a primary (representing the majority of tumor) and secondary (assigned to the minority of the tumor) Gleason grade, each a number between 1 and 5. The sum of the two patterns is the Gleason score, which has prognostic significance. Patients with a Gleason score of ≦4 do well clinically, while patients with a score of 8-9 do poorly. A Gleason score of 6 typically is followed by “watchful waiting”.
RNA Interference
Non-coding RNAi molecules regulate genes post-transcriptionally and can lead to gene silencing. Endogenous dsRNA initiates RNAi by activating the ribonuclease protein Dicer, which binds and cleaves double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) to produce double-stranded fragments of 20-25 base pairs with a 2-nucleotide overhang at the 3′ end, known as siRNAs. These interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are integrated into an active RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), while being separated into single “sense” and “antisense” strands. Within the RISC, the antisense strand then base-pairs to its target mRNA and induces cleavage of the mRNA, thereby preventing it from being used as a translation template. Synthetic siRNA can vary widely in their design, including the specific sequence along the mRNA, accessibility to Dicer and RISC, the length of each strand, optional symmetrical, asymmetrical, blunt, and loop structures, and chemical modifications of many types.
The delivery of RNAi to target tissue is a major challenge. Systemic injection of siRNA into the vascular system needs to overcome renal filtration and phagocytosis and degradation in the bloodstream, and needs to achieve targeting to the diseased site, transport across the vascular endothelial barrier, diffusion through the extracellular matrix, uptake into the cell, escape from the endosome, and unpackaging and releasing the siRNA to the cell RNAi machinery. Systemic delivery today is limited to a small number of target tissues, in particular to the liver.
Even direct injection of naked siRNA to topical targets (for example the eye, skin, mucus membranes, and localized tumors) and intranasal/intratracheal instillation of aerosolized siRNA into the lung is subject to rapid dose decline by diffusion and degradation and increased pressure (in some cases of injection). Repeated injections at a frequency of about one per week are often required.
Alshamsan et al. (STAT3 Silencing in Dendritic Cells by siRNA Polyplexes Encapsulated in PLGA Nanoparticles for the Modulation of Anticancer Immune Response, Molecular Pharmaceutics 7(5): 1643-1654, 2010) reported nanoparticles containing siRNA complexed with polyethylenimine (PEI). However, these devices exhibit fast drug release, typically on the order of one week, and are ineffective to carry high drug loads to a wide tissue area, for a sufficient treatment period.
US Patent Publication No. US2008/0124370 (Marx) describes reagents, methods and systems to treat inflammation and pain in a subject using small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules targeted to either TNF-alpha, IL1, IL6 and other pro-inflammatory cytokines.
US Patent Publication No. US 2011/0195123 (Shemi) describes an implantable medical device eluting drug locally and for a prolonged period, treatment methods, and implantation methods. The device comprises a polymeric substrate and a drug, for example gene silencing drugs based on RNA interference (RNAi), including siRNA, shRNA, or antisense RNA/DNA, ribozyme and nucleoside analogs.
Thus, a continuing need exists for RNAi compositions to effectively treat prostate cancer.
SUMMARY
It has been discovered that prostate carcinoma can be treated by regional, prolonged release of an RNAi-based agent that targets prostate carcinoma-related proteins. Provided herein are systems and methods for treatment of prostate carcinoma. The systems and methods alternatively include manufacturing and implanting polymeric implant(s) loaded with agent, the combination of release parameters enabling treatment periods of various lengths, exploiting the RNAi machinery for specific silencing and RNAi for non-specific immune triggering, the shielding of the RNAi agent against degradation until it is released from the implant, the selected targets, and the release of naked, modified, complexed or conjugated types of siRNA. Such modifications can enable improved treatment efficiency by enhancing cellular uptake and/or spatial distribution, and can reduce toxicity levels.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1: shows exemplary time-release curves of siRNA, as measured in PBS, pH ̃7.
FIG. 2: shows working examples of siRNA release in PBS and its dependence on coating, additives, percent of additives, and conjugation. A) Short release periods ( ̃1.5 month). NC=uncoated drug delivery device (DDD); C=coated DDD; Additive I=Mannitol (“Add1”, 5% and 10%); Additive II=Trehalose (“Add2”, 1%, 5% and 10%); “Conjugated”=cholesterol-conjugated (with Mannitol 10%). All samples were non-coated, except for the one indicated as coated. B) Longer release periods ̃(3-6 months).
FIG. 3: shows the effect of down-regulation of Androgen Receptor (AR), by two different siRNA sequences, on cell viability of PC3 prostate cancer cells. Also shown are the calibration and selection of siRNA doses. AR1 & AR2 refer to siAR-1 and siAR-2, respectively. Mock=mock-transfected; u/t=untransfected; SC=scrambled (non-specific) siRNA. Testing was done at 0.5×104 (left panels) and 0.75×104 (right panels) cells/well. Vertical axis: upper panel—OD; lower panel—percentage of viable cells (calculated relative to mock transfected cells). Horizontal axis: siRNA concentration. All changes were significant, with a p value of less than 0.001.
FIG. 4 shows the effect of treatment by various siRNA on viability of PC3 cells, ordered by efficacy (A), and on mRNA levels (B, C, D). PC3 were seeded in 6-well plates one day before transfection. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent. The indicated siRNas were used at a 150 nM concentration, which is 6-μg/well. Scrambled (non-targeting) siRNA was used as a transfection control. For the viability test, cells were grown for 72 hrs, fixed in 4% PFA and stained as by Methylene blue (MB). Percentage viability was normalized to the viability of the scrambled-transfected cells. In each case, the difference between the siRNA-treated cells and the scrambled-transfected cells was significant when compared to the difference between the quadruplicate samples. For RNA quantization, 24-hrs post-transfection, total RNA was purified using Trizol® reagent (InvitrogenTM). cDNA was prepared using gScriptTM cDNA Synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences). Relative mRNA level was assessed compared to HPRT endogenous control using the Image Gauge computer program.
FIG. 5 shows release profiles of DDDs that ‘hibernate’ (do not release a significant amount of drug) during an initial period. In the depicted examples, the cumulative drug released during the first three months is less than  ̃10% (in vitro at 37° C. in PBS; data set A) and/or the release during the first month is less than  ̃5% (in vivo, inside a mouse; data set B). The DDDs contain trehalose.
FIG. 6: shows implantation of DDDs in the external prostate using ultrasound biopsy procedure.
FIG. 7: shows an example of distribution of DDDs in an exemplary protocol, mainly in the peripheral zone.
FIG. 8: shows a picture of the distal end of an 18-gauge biopsy needle and DDDs of dimensions 0.8 mm×1.7 mm.
FIG. 9: A. shows the Argonaut (Ago) cleavage site on an siRNA with overhangs and exemplary sites for modifications. B. shows the Ago cleavage site on a blunt-ended siRNA and exemplary sites for modifications.
FIG. 10: Effect of anti BMI-1 (si-BMI1) and anti-hTERT siRNA on cell viability in several cancer cell lines, namely prostate, pancreas, colon (two lines), lung (two lines), neuroblastoma, embryonic kidney, and hepato-cellular carcinoma.



SEQUENCE LISTING
The nucleic and/or amino acid sequences listed in the accompanying sequence listing are shown using standard letter abbreviations for nucleotide bases, and three letter code for amino acids, as defined in United States of America Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations 1.822. In cases where only one strand of each nucleic acid sequence is shown, the complementary strand is understood as included by any reference to the displayed strand. The Sequence Listing is submitted as an ASCII text file named “SILE 2142-1.3 SEQ listing—FINAL_ST25”, created Nov. 11, 2012, about 27 KB, which is incorporated by reference herein. In the accompanying sequence listing:
SEQ ID NOs 1-33 are the target sequences set forth in Table 2.
The even-numbered sequences from SEQ ID Nos: 34-102 are the sense siRNA sequences set forth in Table 2.
The odd-numbered sequences from SEQ ID Nos: 35-103 are the antisense siRNA sequences set forth in Table 2.
SEQ ID NOs 104-107 are exemplary sequences having 2′-OMe-modifications and dTdT tails.
SEQ ID NOs 108-109 are the sense and antisense strands, respectively of the siG12D utilized herein.
SEQ ID NOs 110-114 are exemplary sequences of cell-penetrating peptides.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Described herein is a millimeter-scale DDD comprising: (a) a biodegradable matrix; and (b) an RNA interfering (RNAi) agent that targets a prostate-carcinoma-related target gene. Typically, the biodegradable matrix is a biodegradable polymeric matrix, meaning that it comprises a polymer. In some embodiments, the RNAi agent is incorporated within the biodegradable matrix. In other embodiments, the RNAi agent is dispersed within the biodegradable matrix.
The term “RNAi agent”, in certain embodiments, may refer to a nucleotide molecule that decreases or “downregulates” the level of an RNA target in a cell in a sequence-specific manner. In other embodiments, the RNA target is a messenger RNA.
In particular embodiments, RNAi nucleotides are short (or small) interfering RNA (siRNA), short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and microRNA. Other embodiments include longer polynucleotide molecules that are processed intracellularly to yield siRNA. Such molecules include DsiRNA, which are cleaved by the RNase III class endoribonuclease dicer into 21-23 base duplexes having a 2-base 3′-overhang; UsiRNAs, which are duplex siRNAs that are modified with non-nucleotide acyclic monomers, termed unlocked nucleobase analogs (UNA), in which the bond between two adjacent carbon atoms of ribose is removed—these may be designed to enter the RNAi (RNA inhibitory) pathway via Dicer enzyme or directly into RISC; self-delivering RNA (sdRNA) such as rxRNA® of RXi Therapeutics, which has a single-stranded phosphorothioate region, a short duplex region, and contains a variety of nuclease-stabilizing and lipophilic chemical modifications; aptamers, triple-helix antisense nucleotides, DNAzymes; and agents inhibiting the pre-mRNA maturation step of polyA tail addition such as the U1 adaptor (Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) Inc). The U1 adaptor consists of two parts, a target-gene binding domain and a U′1 domain that attracts and inhibits the cellular splicing apparatus. By combining both capabilities in the same molecule, the U1 adaptor can inhibit the pre-mRNA maturation step of polyA tail addition.
Target Genes
“Prostate-cancer-related target gene” refers, as used herein, to a gene that is upregulated in prostate carcinoma cells (in all or a fraction of tumors, preferably at least 10% of tumors) relative to healthy (non-cancerous) prostate tissue. In other embodiments, the term refers to a gene that is upregulated in prostate carcinoma cells with metastatic potential relative to healthy somatic cells. In other embodiments, the term refers to a gene that is upregulated (whose expression is increased) in all or a fraction of prostate tumors relative to healthy somatic cells. Alternatively, the term may refer to a gene that is upregulated in all or a fraction of prostate tumors relative to non-embryonic somatic cells.
In other embodiments, the target prostate cancer-related gene is expressed in all or a portion of prostate tumors and is undetectable in healthy tissue by standard methods such as gene expression array.
Non-limiting examples of preferred prostate-carcinoma-related genes are set forth in Table 1. In certain embodiments, the target is selected from Androgen Receptor, Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (Pappalysin; PAPPA), Neurophilin and tolloid-like 2 (NETO2), Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor α (PTPRA), BMI1 polycomb ring finger oncogene (BMI-1), Interleukin 6 signal transducer (IL6ST)/gp130, human Telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), Bromodomain containing 4 (BRD4), ErbB3/HER3, PSCA prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2)/Ets Related Gene (ERG) gene fusion (TMPRSS2/ERG), Carbonic anhydrase XII (CA12), MEK4/MAP2K4, p63/KET, Transmembrane and coiled-coil protein 1 (TMCC1), TMCC2, TMCC3, Neurotrimin (NTM), Cluster of Differentiation 70 (CD70), Transmembrane protein 50B (Tmem50b), Claudin-11 (CLDN11), Neuroplastin NPTN, and CD44. Each target represents a separate embodiment.
In more specific embodiments, the target may be selected from the group consisting of Androgen Receptor, Pappalysin, NETO2, PTPRA, BMI-1, IL6ST/gp130, hTERT, BRD4, ErbB3/HER3, PSCA, and EZH2.
In other embodiments, the target may be selected from the group consisting of Androgen Receptor, Pappalysin, NETO2, PTPRA, BMI-1, IL6ST/gp130, BRD4, and EZH2.
In addition to the role of these prostate-carcinoma-related genes in prostate cancer, the role of such genes in more cancers has been intensively explored and in some cases demonstrated. Recently, Song et al (Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 1754-1760) found that BMI-1 plays an important role in the late progression of pancreatic cancer and may represent a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Reference to a particular gene or protein herein includes, in some embodiments, all isoforms of the gene or protein.
In certain, more specific embodiments, the target is associated with prostate carcinoma stem cells. Non-limiting examples of prostate carcinoma stem cell targets are CA12, p63, Pappalysin, NETO2, Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor α, TMCC1, TMCC2, TMCC3, Neurotrimin, CD70, Tmem50b, Claudin-11, and Neuroplastin NPTN. In other embodiments, the target is another prostate carcinoma target. In other embodiments, the target is another stem cell-specific target.







TABLE 1







Exemplary RNAi Targets:












Exemplary




Synonyms/GenBank Gene
GenBank



Name
ID No.
Accession #′s
Remarks





Androgen
KD; AIS; TFM; DHTR;
NM_000044.3
Expressed in 100%


Receptor
SBMA; HYSP1; NR3C4;
NM_001011645.2
of prostate cancer



SMAX1; HUMARA
NM_000044.2
lesions



Gene ID #: 367
M20132.1





FJ235918





NM_001011645.1



Pappalysin
PAPPA pregnancy-
NM_002581.3




associated plasma protein A





Gene ID #: 5069.




NETO2
Neurophilin (NRP) and
NM_001081324.1
Transcript variants



tolloid (TLL)-like 2;
NM_001201477.1
1 and/or 2 can be



BTCL2; NEOT2.
(variant 2)
targeted



Gene ID #: 81831.
NM_018092.4





(variant 1)



Protein tyrosine
LRP; HLPR; PTPA;
NM_080840.2



phosphatase
HEPTP; HPTPA; RPTPA;
NM_001163688.1



receptor α
PTPRL2; HPTPalpha; R-




(PTPRA)
PTP-alpha.





Gene ID #: 5786.




BMI-1
BMI1 polycomb ring finger 
NC_000010.10




oncogene,





Gene ID #648




gp130
IL6ST interleukin 6 signal
NM_001190981.1




transducer; CD130;
NM_175767.2




CDW130; IL-6RB.
NM_002184.3




Gene ID #3572.




hTERT
TERT telomerase reverse
NM_001193376




transcriptase
NM_198253.2




Gene ID #7015




BRD4
BRD4 bromodomain
NM_014299.2




containing 4; CAP; MCAP;
NM_058243.2




HUNK1; HUNKI.





Gene ID #23476.




ErbB3
HER3; LCCS2; ErbB-3; c-
NM_001005915.1




erbB3; erbB3-S; MDA-BF-
NM 001982.3




1
NP_001973




Gene ID #2065




PSCA
PSCA prostate stem cell
NM_005672.4




antigen; PRO232
NP_005663




Gene ID #8000




EZH2
Enhancer of zeste homolog 
NM_004456.4




2; ENX1; EZH1; KMT6;
NM_152998.2




WVS2; ENX-1; KMT6A.
NM_001203247.1




Gene ID #2146
NM_001203248.1





NM_001203249.1



CD44

NM_001202557.1





NM_001202556.1





NM_001202555.1





NM_001001392.1





NM_001001391.1





NM_001001390.1





NM_001001389.1





NM_000610.3









Additional Targets

TMPRSS2/ERG fusion gene is a fusion of ERG v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (also known as erg-3; Gene ID#: 2078) to TMPRSS2 transmembrane protease, serine 2 (also known as PP9284 or PRSS10; Gene ID#: 7113). It is expressed in 15-80% of prostate cancer lesions.
CA12 Carbonic anhydrase XII (also known as CAXII or HsT18816; Gene ID #: 771) is a transmembrane and extracellular enzyme involved in the regulation of microenvironment acidity and tumor malignancy. CA XII has a central role in hypoxia and tumor acidosis, invasion and metastasis. Representative GenBank sequence: NM—001218.3.
MEK4 (also known as MAP2K4; JNKK; MEK4; MKK4; SEK1; JNKK1; SERK1; MAPKK4; PRKMK4; SAPKK1; and SAPKK-1; Gene ID #: 6416) regulates prostate cancer cell invasion/metastasis. See US 2009/0124569. Representative GenBank sequence: NM—003010.2.
p63 (also known as KET, p51A/B, CUSP, p40, and p73L; Gene ID #: 8626) is a transcription factor and homologue of p53. Representative GenBank sequences: NM—001114978.1, NM—001114979.1, NM—001114980.1, NM—001114981.1, NM—001114982.1, and NM—003722.4.
Transmembrane and coiled-coil proteins (TMCCs) are a group of putative proteins that contain a coiled-coil domain and two transmembrane domains. Both transmembrane domains are located in the C-terminal region (571-653a.a.). There are three family members in humans, which share high sequence homology, namely TMCC1, TMCC2, and TMCC3 (GenBank Gene ID #'s 23023, 9911, and 57458, respectively).
Neurotrimin is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell adhesion molecule expressed on neuronal populations (GenBank Gene ID #50863).
CD70, a member of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily, is a type II integral membrane protein and the ligand for CD27 (GenBank Gene ID #970).
Tmem50b (GenBank Gene ID #757) is one of two genes in the transmembrane 50 group.
Claudin-11, also known as oligodendrocyte-specific protein, was first identified to be specifically expressed in the tight junction (TJ) strands of oligodendrocytes in brain and in sertoli cells of rats and mice (GenBank Gene ID #5010).
Neuroplastin NPTN (previously known as stromal cell derived factor receptor I) is a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily (GenBank Gene ID #27020).
CD44: CD44 is a multifunctional protein involved in cell adhesion and signaling. Studies have shown both tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting effects of CD44 in prostate cancer development and progression (Patrawala et al). Gene ID#960.
All isoforms of the proteins mentioned herein may be included. The mention of particular representative sequences is not intended to exclude isoforms not exemplified herein.
In other embodiments, the DDD comprises two or more separate RNAi agents. In other embodiments, 2 of the above-listed genes are targeted.
In other embodiments, the DDD further comprises an RNAi agent that targets a gene involved in vasculogenesis, angiogenesis and endothelial growth, and/or epidermal growth. In a more specific embodiment, the target is selected from VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor), Aurora B kinase (AURKB), and EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor). In other embodiments, the angiogenesis target is targeted together with gene from Table 1 above. For example, a DDD may comprise a first RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from Androgen Receptor, Pappalysin, NETO2, PTPRA, BMI1, IL6ST/gp130, hTERT, BRD4, ErbB3/HER3, PSCA, EZH2, TMPRSS2/ERG, CA12, MEK4/MAP2K4, p63/KET, TMCC1, TMCC2, TMCC3, Neurotrimin, CD70, Tmem50b, Claudin-11, Neuroplastin NPTN, and CD44; and a second RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from VEGF, AURKB, and EGFR. In other embodiments, the DDD comprises a first RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from Androgen Receptor, Pappalysin, NETO2, PTPRA, BMI-1, IL6ST/gp130, hTERT, BRD4, ErbB3/HER3, PSCA, and EZH2; and a second RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from VEGF, AURKB, and EGFR. In still other embodiments, the DDD comprises a first RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from Androgen Receptor, Pappalysin, NETO2, PTPRA, BMI-1, IL6ST/gp130, BRD4, and EZH2; and a second RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from VEGF, AURKB, and EGFR.
In other embodiments, the angiogenesis target is targeted together with a prostate cancer stem cell target. In other embodiments, the DDD comprises a first RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from CA12, p63, Pappalysin, NETO2, Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor α, TMCC1, TMCC2, TMCC3, Neurotrimin, CD70, Tmem50b, Claudin-11, and Neuroplastin NPTN; and a second RNAi agent that targets a gene selected from VEGF, AURKB, and EGFR.
In other embodiments, the angiogenesis gene is targeted together with two prostate cancer targets. In other embodiments, the two prostate cancer targets are targets listed in Table 1 above.
In other embodiments, the target of an siRNA present in a DDD of the methods and compositions described herein is one of the target sequences set forth in Table 2 (SEQ ID Nos: 1-33).
In other embodiments, the sense sequence of an siRNA present in a DDD of the methods and compositions described herein is one of the sense siRNA sequences set forth in Table 2 (even-numbered sequences from SEQ ID Nos: 34-102).
In other embodiments, the antisense sequence of an siRNA present in a DDD of the methods and compositions described herein is one of the antisense siRNA sequences set forth in Table 2 (odd-numbered sequences from SEQ ID Nos: 35-103).







TABLE 2







Exemplary target sequences and siRNA sequences.











Sequence
Target sequence/
Position and GenBank


SEQ
name/
Sense sequence/
Accession No. of targets;


ID
siRNA
Antisense sequence,
specificity; and other


No:
number
5′-3′
comments





  1
siAR-1
UGCCAGGGACCAUGUUUUG
NM_000044.3: 2741;


 34
201
UGCCAGGGACCAUGUUUUGdTdT
NM_001011645.2: 192


 35

CAAAACAUGGUCCCUGGCAdTdT



 


  2
siAR-2
CGGAAAUGUUAUGAAGCAG
NM_000044.3: 2967


 36
202
CGGAAAUGUUAUGAAGCAGdTdT
NM_001011645.2: 418


 37

CUGCUUCAUAACAUUUCCGdTdT



 


  3
siAR-3
GCUGAAGAAACUUGGUAAU
NM_000044.3: 3626


 38
203
GCUGAAGAAACUUGGUAAUdTdT
NM_001011645.2: 1077


 39

AUUACCAAGUUUCUUCAGCdTdT



 


  4
siAR-4
UGAUUUAUACUUCUCUGUU
NM_000044.3: 3026


 40
204
UGAUUUAUACUUCUCUGUUdTdT
NM_001011645.2: 477


 41

AACAGAGAAGUAUAAAUCAdTdT



 


  5
siBMI1-1
UGAUUUAUACUUCUCUGUU
siBMI-1-1 start 2016, Hs


 42
205
UGAUUUAUACUUCUCUGUUdTdT
and Mm


 43

AACAGAGAAGUAUAAAUCAdTdT



 


  6
siBMI1-2
AUGAAUGGAACCAGCAACA
siBMI-1-2, start 1383, Hs


 44
206
AUGAAUGGAACCAGCAACAdTdT
and Mm


 45

UGUUGCUGGUUCCAUUCAUdTdT



 


  7
siCDC44-
CUGAGCAUCGGAUUUGAGACUG
siCD44-1 (starts at 641,


 46
1
CUGAGCAUCGGAUUUGAGAdTdT
all 8 Hs variants, targets


 47
207
UCUCAAAUCCGAUGCUCAGdTdT
Hs only)


 


  8
siCDC44-
GGCGCAGAUCGAUUUGAAU
pos. 2003, Hs only, v-1


 48
2
GGCGCAGAUCGAUUUGAAUdTdT
(NM_198253.2) and v-2


 49
208
UGAGACGCUCGGCCCUCUUdTdT
(NM_001193376.1)


 


  9
si-
AAGAGGGCCGAGCGUCUCA
siCD44-2 (starts at 491,


 50
hTERT-1
AAGAGGGCCGAGCGUCUCAdTdT
all 8 Hs variants, targets


 51
209
AUUCAAAUCGAUCUGCGCCdTdT
Hs only)


 


 10
si-
GAACGUUCCGCAGAGAAAA
starts at 1986, Hs only v-


 52
hTERT-2
GAACGUUCCGCAGAGAAAAdTdT
1(NM_198253.2) and v-


 53
210
UUUUCUCUGCGGAACGUUCdTdT
2(NM_001193376.1)


 


 11
si-
GCACUUCCUCUACUCCUCA
starts at 1045, Hs only


 54
hTERT-3
GCACUUCCUCUACUCCUCAdTdT



 55
211
UGAGGAGUAGAGGAAGUGCdTdT



 


 12
si-
CACCAAGAAGUUCAUCUCC
starts at 1528, Hs only


 56
hTERT-4
CACCAAGAAGUUCAUCUCCdTdT



 57
212
GGAGAUGAACUUCUUGGUGdTdT



 


 13
si-
CAUCGCCAGCAUCAUCAAA
starts at 2242, Hs only


 58
hTERT-5
CAUCGCCAGCAUCAUCAAAdTdT



 59
213
UUUGAUGAUGCUGGCGAUGdTdT



 


 14
siNETO2-
GACUCAUAUCCACCAAACA
in open mRNA area:


 60
1
GACUCAUAUCCACCAAACAdTdT
starting at 603 nt in v 1 & 2,


 61
214
UGUUUGGUGGAUAUGAGUCdTdT
NM_001201477.1 (v2)





and NM_018092.4 (v1)


 


 15
siNETO2-
CAGGGAGATTCATGTGGAT
starting at 811 nt in both


 62
2
CAGGGAGAUUCAUGUGGAUdTdT
variants,


 63
215
AUCCACAUGAAUCUCCCUGdTdT
NM_001201477.1 (v2)





and NM_018092.4 (v1)


 


 16
siNETO2-
GTCTTGGTCCTTCTCATTA
starting at 1464 at v2 and


 64
3
GUCUUGGUCCUUCUCAUUAdTdT
1485 at v1


 65
216
UAAUGAGAAGGACCAAGACdTdT



 


  3
siAR-3-
GCUGAAGAAACUUGGUAAU
Modified siAR-1.


 66
O-Me
GCoUGAAGAAACUoUGGoUAAU



 67
217
AUoUACoCAAGUUUCUUoCAGC



 


 14
siNETO2-
GACUCAUAUCCACCAAACA
Modified siNETO2-1


 68
1-O-Me
GACUoCAoUAUCoCACoCAAAoCA



 69
218
oUGUUoUGGoUGGAUAoUGAGUC



 


 17
gp130
GGCAUACCUUAAACAAGCU
targets all 3 variants:


 70
219
GGCAUACCUUAAACAAGCUdTdT
NM_001190981.1 (v3) at


 71

AGCUUGUUUAAGGUAUGCCdTdT
1663, NM_175767.2 (v2)





at 1763, NM_002184.3





(v1) at 1846


 


 18
PTPRA-1
GACGACAAUAAGCUCUUCA
targets 3 Hs variants and


 72
220
GACGACAAUAAGCUCUUCAdTdT
Mm, starts at 1072 at v2


 73

UGAAGAGCUUAUUGUCGUCdTdT
NM_080840.2


 


 19
PTPRA-2
CCUUAUGACCACUCUAGAG
targets 3 Hs variants,


 74
221
CCUUAUGACCACUCUAGAGdTdT
starts at 1192 at v2


 75

CUCUAGAGUGGUCAUAAGGdTdT
NM_080840.2


 


 20
PTPRA-3
GAUGAGACACCAAUUAUUG
targets 3 Hs variants and


 76
222
GAUGAGACACCAAUUAUUGdTdT
Mm, starts at 808 at v2


 77

CAAUAAUUGGUGUCUCAUCdTdT
NM_080840.2


 


 21
PTPRA-4
GCCAAAACUUCAAAUCCAA
targets 3 Hs variants,


 78
223
GCCAAAACUUCAAAUCCAAdTdT
starts at 532 at v2


 79

UUGGAUUUGAAGUUUUGGCdTdT
NM_080840.2


 


 22
PTPRA-5
CCACAAGAACAGCAAGCAC
targets 3 Hs variants,


 80
224
CCACAAGAACAGCAAGCACdTdT
starts at 654 at v2


 81

GUGCUUGCUGUUCUUGTGGdTdT
NM_080840.2


 


 23
PAPPA-1
CGACGACAUGAAUAAGAUC
targets Hs and Mm, starts


 82
225
CGACGACAUGAAUAAGAUCdTdT
at nt 3261 at


 83

GAUCUUAUUCAUGUCGUCGdTdT
NM_002581.3


 


 24
PAPPA-2
CCAUCAGCUACCCAUAUUC
targets Hs , starts at nt


 84
226
CCAUCAGCUACCCAUAUUCdTdT
3593 at NM_002581.3


 85

GAAUAUGGGUAGCUGAUGGdTdT



 


 25
PAPPA-3
GGAAGGCAACCAGCUGUUA
targets Hs and Mm, starts


 86
227
GGAAGGCAACCAGCUGUUAdTdT
at nt 100 at NM_002581.3


 87

UAACAGCUGGUUGCCUUCCdTdT



 


 26
siErbB3-1
GCTGAGAACCAATACCAGA
both variants,


 88
228
GCTGAGAACCAATACCAGAdTdT
NM_001982.3 and


 89

TCTGGTATTGGTTCTCAGCdTdT
NM_001005915.1, 317-





335 in NM_001005915.1


 


 27
siErbB3-2
CAACUCUCAGGCAGUGUGU
both variants, 262-280 in


 90
229
CAACUCUCAGGCAGUGUGUdTdT
NM_001005915.1


 91

ACACACUGCCUGAGAGUUGdTdT



 


 28
siPSCA-1
CACGAAGGCUGUGCUGCUU
Targets NM_005672.4 at


 92
230
CACGAAGGCUGUGCUGCUUdTdT
56-74


 93

AAGCAGCACAGCCUUCGUGdTdT



 


 29
siPSCA-2
CGUGCUGUGACACCGACUU
NM_005672.4 at 310-328


 94
231
CGUGCUGUGACACCGACUUdTdT



 95

AAGUCGGUGUCACAGCACGdTdT



 


 30
siBrd4-1
CCAACGCAGCCAGCACCAA
both variants:


 96
232
CCAACGCAGCCAGCACCAAdTdT
NM_014299.2 and


 97

UUGGUGCUGGCUGCGUUGGdTdT
NM_058243.2


 


 31
siBrd4-2
CUGGAAUGCUCAGGAAUGU
targets both variants


 98
233
CUGGAAUGCUCAGGAAUGUdTdT



 99

ACAUUCCUGAGCAUUCCAGdTdT



 


 32
siEZH2-1
CCUGACCUCUGUCUUACUU
all 5 variants:


100
234
CCUGACCUCUGUCUUACUUdTdT
NM_004456.4 (v1),


101

AAGUAAGACAGAGGUCAGGdTdT
NM_152998.2 (v2),





NM_001203247.1 (v3),





NM_001203248.1 (v4),





NM_001203249.1 (v5);





1952-1970 in v1


 


 33
siEZH2-2
CUGGGAAGAAAUCUGAGAA
all 5 variants:


102
235
CUGGGAAGAAAUCUGAGAAdTdT
204-222 in v1


103

UUCUCAGAUUUCUUCCCAGdTdT









Modifications of Specific Sequences

In other embodiments, the following 4 sequence criteria are used to design additional siRNA molecules:
(1) AU richness in the 5′-terminal, 7-bp-long region of the antisense strand;
(2) G/C at the 5′ end of the sense strand; and
(3) the absence of any long GC stretch of >9 bp in length.
(4) a G/C content ranging from 36% to 52%.
In certain embodiments, an RNAi agent that is used is between 25-30 nt, inclusive, in length. More specifically, the length may be 25-27 nt. In other embodiments, the length is 19-25-nt. In other embodiments, the length is 19 nt. In other embodiments, the sense strand and/or the antisense strand further comprises a 1-6-nt 3′-overhang. In other embodiments, a two-base 3′ overhang is present. In more specific embodiments, the sense strand and the antisense strand each further comprises a 2-nt 3′-overhang.
siRNA structure determinants: In one embodiment, the A-form helix of the guide strand-mRNA duplex is preferred. A 25-30-nt asymmetric dsRNAs with a 5′ blunt end and a 2-nt 3′ overhang on the other end is also preferred. In certain embodiments, a blunt structure at the 3′ end is present, followed by a 5′ overhang.
Loops, if present, may be preferably on the 3′ end of the sense strand, or also may be on the 5′ end of the sense strand. The loop may contain nucleotides optionally in combination with non-nucleotide residues.
In other embodiments, an siRNA used in the described methods and compositions has a 19+2 overhang design, namely sense and anti-sense of 19 base-paired nucleotides and two unpaired nucleotides at the 3′ end of each of the strands. In certain embodiments, as exemplified herein, the overhangs are each dTdT (2 deoxythymidine residues). Non-limiting examples of siRNA molecules with dTdT tails are shown in Table 2.
In other embodiments, one or both strands of an siRNA described herein is modified by 2′-OMe, 2′-F, or another modification. In some embodiments, the positions identified below as “o” may be modified with 2′-OMe:









AR siRNA (#217):










Sense:
(SEQ ID No: 66)









5′ GCoUGAAGAAACUoUGGoUAAU



 










Antisense:
(SEQ ID No: 67)









3′ AUoUACoCAAGUUUCUUoCAGC



 



siNETO2 (#218):










Sense:
(SEQ ID No: 68)









5′ GACUoCAoUAUCoCACoCAAAoCA



 










Antisense:
(SEQ ID No: 69)









5′ oUGUUoUGGoUGGAUAoUGAGUC






2′-OMe-modified oligonucleotides may be used with or, in other embodiments without, overhangs at the 3′ end of each of the strands. In certain embodiments, the overhangs each consist of two unpaired nucleotides. In more specific embodiments, as exemplified herein, the overhangs are each dTdT (2 deoxythymidine residues). Non-limiting examples of siRNA molecules with 2′-OMe-modifications and dTdT tails are shown below.









AR siRNA + tail:










Sense:
(SEQ ID No: 104)









5′ GCoUGAAGAAACUoUGGoUAAUdTdT



 










Antisense:
(SEQ ID No: 105)









3′ AUoUACoCAAGUUUCUUoCAGCdTdT



 



siNETO2 + tail:










Sense:
(SEQ ID No: 106)









5′ GACUoCAoUAUCoCACoCAAAoCAdTdT



 










Antisense:
(SEQ ID No: 107)









5′ oUGUUoUGGoUGGAUAoUGAGUCdTdT.






Chemical Modifications

In other embodiments, an RNAi agent used in the described methods and compositions may be chemically modified. In another embodiment, the modification is a backbone or linkage modification. In another embodiment, the modification is a nucleoside base modification. In another embodiment, the modification is a sugar modification. In more specific embodiments, the modification is selected from the modifications appearing in Table 2 hereinbelow. In more specific embodiments, the modification is selected from a 2′-O-methyl (2′-OMe), 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) (MOE) and 2′-fluorine modification. In still more specific embodiments, the modification is a 2′-O-methyl (2′-OMe) modification. In other embodiments, the modification is selected from a locked nucleic acid (LNA) and/or peptide nucleic acid (PNA) backbone.
In some embodiments, siRNA modifications are designed based on the following guidelines:

    
    
        1. Cluster modifications around endonuclease cleavage sites: 5′-UA, 5′-CA, 5′-UG
        2. When choosing modification sites use the following guiding rules:
        
            a. Fewer modifications on the antisense strand compared to the sense strand.
            b. Avoid modifications on the Argonaut (Ago) cleavage site (the 10 nth nucleotide on antisense strand; FIGS. 9A-B).
            c. As modification increases duplex stability, therefore make fewer modifications on the 3′ end of the sense strand or the 5′ end of antisense strand.
        
        
        3. Order modifications in diagonal 5′ to 5′.
        4. Use of blunt ends instead of overhangs lower exonuclease activity.
    
    









TABLE 3







Selected chemical modifications.








Modification
Position of the substitution










Sugar modifications








dNTPs- dTdT
3′-overhangs of sense and anti-sense strands


dNTPs- dNPs
Any number of residues in the sense strand; 0-4 



residues at the 5′ end of the antisense strand


2′-O-methyl (2′OMe)
Any number of residues in the sense and 


rNPs
antisense strands


2′-fluoro (2′-F) rNPs
Any number of pyrimidine residues in the 



sense and antisense strands


combined use of 2′OMe
Any number of pyrimidine residues in the 


and 2′-F
sense and antisense strands to 2′-F; and any 



number of purine residues in the sense 



and antisense strands to 2′-OMe.


2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) 
Any number of pyrimidine residues in the 


(MOE) rNPs
sense and antisense strands


2′-fluoro-β-D (FANA) 
Any number of pyrimidine residues 


rNPs
in the sense strand


Locked nucleic acids 
from none till 4 last ribonucleotides at 


(LNA)
the 3′ end of the sense strand; and 3′ 



overhangs of the antisense strand


combined use of DNA
substitution of any number of pyrimidine 


and 2′-F
(T and C) ribonucleotides to 2′-F 



ribonucleotides and any number of 



purines (A and G) to deoxyribonucleotides



in sense and antisense strands







phosphate linkage modifications - phosphorotioate (PS)








phosphodiester
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 



in sense and antisense strands


phosphothioate (PS)
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 



in sense and antisense strands


boranophosphate DNA 
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides


or RNA
in sense and antisense strands


amide-linked
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 



in sense and antisense strands


phosphoramidate
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 



in sense and antisense strands


methylphosphonate
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 



in sense and antisense strands


2′,5′-linked DNA or
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides 


RNA
in sense strand







Base modifications








5-bromouracil (5-Br-
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 


Ura)
in sense and antisense strands


5-iodouracil (5-1-Ura)
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 



in sense and antisense strands


dihydrouracil
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 



in sense and antisense strands


2-thiouracil
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 



in sense and antisense strands


4-thiouracil
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 



in sense and antisense strands


pseudouracil
substitution of any number of ribouraciles 



in sense and antisense strands


diaminopurine
substitution of any number of adenines 



in both sense and antisense


difluorotoluene
substitution of any number of adenines 



in both sense and antisense


peptide nucleic acids
substitution of any number of ribonucleotides


(PNAs)
in sense and antisense strands


(2-aminoethylglycine)








modifications to the overhangs and termini








2-nt-3′-DNA overhang
3′ end of sense and antisense strands


2-nt-3′-RNA overhang
3′ end of sense and antisense strands


blunt-ended duplexes
3′ end of sense and antisense strands







chemical conjugation








cholesterol
covalently attached to sense strand


vitamin-E (α-tocopherol)
covalently attached to sense strand









In other embodiments, the chemical modification is a modification described in paragraphs 0040-0050 of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In other embodiments, the chemical modification is a modification to the overhang(s) and/or termini, or to the duplex architecture, as described in paragraphs 0061 and 0062, respectively, of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
In other embodiments, an RNAi agent used in the described methods and compositions may be conjugated to a molecule. In more specific embodiments, a non-nucleotide molecule is used. In more specific embodiments, the molecule may be cholesterol, a cell penetrating peptide, or alpha-tocopherol-vitamin E. In certain embodiments, the cholesterol may be conjugated to the 3′ end of the sense strand. In other embodiments, the cholesterol may be conjugated to the 5′ end of the sense strand. In certain embodiments, in the case of a hairpin-shaped molecule, the cholesterol may be conjugated to the loop. In other embodiments, the non-nucleotide molecule is a molecule described in paragraphs 0051-0060 of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
In certain embodiments, the RNAi agent is associated, either via covalent attachment or via non-covalent complexation, with a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), also referred to as protein transduction domains (PTDs). A CPP is a peptide that has the ability to traverse the plasma membrane and facilitate the delivery of a molecular cargo to the cytoplasm. CPP's include HIV-1 Tat (NCBI Gene ID: 155871) or a fragment thereof comprising the sequence YGRKKRRQRRR (SEQ ID No: 110); pAntp (penetratin) and pIsl, which originate from the third helix of homeodomain proteins (Antennapedia (NCBI Gene ID: 40835; Terrone et al) and Isl-1 (NCBI Gene ID: 3670 and Magzoub et al), respectively); Transportan, a synthetic chimera of galanin and mastoparan (GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL-amide [SEQ ID No: 111]; Pooga et al), MPG (GALFLGFLGAAGSTMGA [SEQ ID No: 112]); Pep-1 (KETWWETWWTEW SEQ ID No: 113]); and secondary amphipathic peptides based on aromatic tryptophan and arginine residues linked with lysine as spacer (“CADY”), which contain a short peptide sequence of 20 amino acids, with the sequence “Ac-GLWRALWRLLRSLWRLLWRA-cysteamide” (SEQ ID No: 114). CPP's are known to those skilled in the art and are described inter alia in Deshayes et al.
In other embodiments, an RNAi agent used in the described methods and compositions may be complexed with a cationic molecule, such as DOTAP (N-[1-(2,3-Dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium) DOPE (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-di-O-octadecenyl-3-trimethylammonium propane (DOTMA), spermine, PEI (polyethylenimine), a PEI-PLA polymer, or N-Acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc). In other embodiments, the non-nucleotide molecule is a molecule described in paragraphs 0051-0060 of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
In other embodiments, an RNAi agent used in the described methods and compositions is a hairpin-shaped molecule. In another embodiment, an RNAi agent used in the described methods and compositions is a double-stranded molecule containing 2 separate strands. In another embodiment, the RNAi agent is selected from the group consisting of a small interfering RNA (siRNA), a short hairpin RNA (shRNA), a Dicer-substrate siRNAs (DsiRNAs), a microRNA, and a non-coding RNA.
Millimeter-Scale Implant/Matrix Drug Delivery Technology
The drug delivery device of the described methods and compositions may be a cylinder, a sphere, or any other shape suitable for an implant (i.e. that can be implanted in a subject). In certain embodiments, the device is a cylinder.
“Millimeter-scale”, as used herein, refers to a device whose smallest diameter is a least 0.3 mm. In certain embodiments, each of the dimensions (diameter, in the case of a sphere or cylinder; and height and/or width or length, in the case of a cylinder, box-like structure, cube, or other shape with flat walls) is between 0.3-10 mm, inclusive. In other embodiments, each dimension is between 0.5-8 mm, inclusive. In still other embodiments, each dimension is between 0.8-5.2 mm, inclusive, between 1-4 mm, inclusive, between 1-3.5 mm, inclusive, between 1-3 mm, inclusive, or between 1-2.5 mm, inclusive.
In yet other embodiments, the device is a cylinder, having a diameter of 0.8 mm. In other preferred embodiments, the cylinder has a length of 5 mm. In other embodiments, the cylinder has a diameter of 0.8 mm and a length of 5 mm. In other embodiments, a DDD of the described methods and compositions has the diameter of an 18-gauge needle.
In yet other embodiments, the device is cylindrical, with an 0.83-mm diameter ( ̃0.033′′) and a length of 5 mm.
In other embodiments, the volume of the device is between 0.1 mm3 and 1000 mm3, between 0.2 mm3 and 500 mm3, between 0.5 mm3 and 300 mm3, between 0.8 mm3 and 250 mm3, between 1 mm3 and 200 mm3, between 2 mm3 and 150 mm3, between 3 mm3 and 100 mm3, or between 5 mm3 and 50 mm3.
An exemplary embodiment of a DDD has a diameter of 0.8 mm and a length of 5 mm, containing 25% w/w siRNA, namely about 650 μg of siRNA. In other embodiments, the DDD's contain siRNA; PLGA 85:15; D-Mannitol, and sodium bicarbonate. In other experiments, the DDD's contain siRNA, PLGA, trehalose, and sodium bicarbonate. In more particular embodiments, the molecular weight of the PLGA is between 5-15 kDa, inclusive.
In other embodiments, the w/w agent:polymer load ratio above 1:100. In more preferred embodiments, the load is above 1:20. In more preferred embodiments, the load is above 1:9. In more preferred embodiments, the load is above 1:3
In other embodiments, the device is a DDD that is described in US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
The DDD is designed in some embodiments to preferably employ degradable polymers, wherein the release mechanism includes both bulk erosion and diffusion; or in some embodiments, non degradable, or slowly degraded polymers are used, wherein the main release mechanism is diffusion rather than bulk erosion, so that the outer part functions as membrane, and its internal part functions as a drug reservoir, which practically is not affected by the surroundings for an extended period (for example from about a week to about a few months). Combinations of different polymers with different release mechanisms may also optionally be used. The concentration gradient at the surface is preferably maintained effectively constant during a significant period of the total drug releasing period, and therefore the diffusion rate is effectively constant (termed “zero mode” diffusion). The term “constant” refers to a diffusion rate that is preferably maintained above the lower threshold of therapeutic effectiveness, but which may still optionally feature an initial burst and/or fluctuate, for example increasing and decreasing to a certain degree. In other embodiments, there is an initial burst of less than 10% of the total amount of drug, which may be considered negligible. In other embodiments, there is an initial burst of about 20% of the total amount of drug. In other embodiments, the design enables initial a strong burst of 30% or more of the total amount of drug. The diffusion rate is preferably so maintained for a prolonged period, and it can be considered constant to a certain level to optimize the therapeutically effective period, for example the effective silencing period. These embodiments are described in US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
Suitable Release Profiles
In preferred embodiments, a device of the described methods and compositions is designed to release the active agent in a controlled fashion. It will be apparent to those of skill in the art, in light of the knowledge in the art taken together with the information provided herein, that the PLA:PGA ratio, composition and additives, and/or the molecular weight (MW) of the polymer, and controlling the surface-to-volume ratio of the implant may be adjusted to achieve a particular release profile. For example, deviating the PLA:PGA ratio from 50:50, or increasing the MW, or reducing surface-to-volume ratio can increase the release time.
In other embodiments, the DDD of the described methods and compositions is designed with a particular release profile. One relevant parameter is the time point at which 95% of the active agent has been released. In some embodiments, the DDD releases 95% of the active agent in vivo, for example in a human prostate, over a time period between 3-24 months inclusive, for example 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, or 24 months. In other embodiments, the time point of release of 95% of the active agent is between 3-12 months inclusive, between 2-24 months inclusive, between 2-15 months inclusive, between 3-15 months inclusive, between 3-12 months inclusive, between 3-10 months inclusive, between 4-24 months inclusive. Another relevant parameter is the time point at which 90% of the active agent has been released; this may be any of the aforementioned time frames.
Another relevant parameter is the percent of active agent released at a given time point. For example, in some embodiments, 80-99% inclusive of the active agent is released at the 3-month timepoint. In other embodiments, 80-99% inclusive of the active agent is released at the 2-month timepoint or the 4-month, 6-month, 9-month, 12-month, or 24-month timepoint, each of which is considered a separate embodiment.
Alternatively or in addition, in some embodiments no more than 30-50% of the active agent of a DDD of the described methods and compositions is released during the first 3 weeks.
In other embodiments, a delayed-release DDD is utilized. “Delayed-release”, as used herein, refers to DDD's that do not release more than 10% of their drug load within the first 2 months (discounting an initial burst of up to 20%, which sometimes occurs). In other embodiments, the DDD does not release more than 10% of its drug load within the first 3 months. The inventors have discovered that, in some embodiments, DDD's containing 1% trehalose exhibit delayed release. Trehalose has the additional advantage that, in some embodiments, it is effective at a concentration of only 1% (as opposed to 5-10% for mannitol, for example), thus allowing an increased drug load.
In other embodiments, the DDD is coated (by dipping, spraying, or any other method known to those skilled in the art) with a slowly-degraded polymer that contains no drug. Various embodiments of slowly-degraded polymers are described herein, each of which can be utilized to create a delayed-release DDD. In some embodiments, the coating comprises a linear-chain monosaccharide; a disaccharide; a cyclic monosaccharide, a cyclic disaccharide. In other embodiments, the coating comprising an additive selected from lactose, sucrose, dextran, and hydroxyethyl starch. In yet other embodiments, the coating comprises mannitol. Alternatively, the coating may comprise trehalose. In still other embodiments, the coating does not comprise a sugar.
In certain embodiments, less than 5% of the RNAi agent is released from the DDD over a time period of 1 month starting from implantation. In other embodiments, less than 10% of the RNAi agent is released from the DDD over a time period of 1 month starting from implantation.
In other embodiments, a delayed-release DDD is provided, comprising an siRNA against a target that is not a prostate-cancer-related target gene. In other embodiments, a therapeutic package is provided, comprising both (a) one or more delayed-release DDD and (b) one or more DDD that is not delayed-release. In some embodiments, the DDD comprise an siRNA against a prostate-cancer-related target gene. In other embodiments, siRNA is against a target that is not a prostate-cancer-related target gene.
Other exemplary release profiles are depicted in FIG. 1.
Suitable Biodegradable Matrices
In certain embodiments, the biodegradable matrix present in the drug delivery device comprises poly(lactic acid) (PLA). In other embodiments, the biodegradable matrix comprises poly(glycolic acid) (PGA). In other embodiments, the biodegradable matrix comprises both PLA and PGA (known as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) or PLGA).
Methods for making PLGA matrices that incorporate RNAi agents are well known in the art. Exemplary methods are described in described in US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123—for example in Examples 1.1 and 1.2 thereof.
In other embodiments, the PLA/PGA ratio of PLGA used in the methods and compositions is between 25:75 and 75:25. In other embodiments, the ratio is between 50:50 and 75:25, meaning that there is between 50-75% PLA and between 25-50% PGA in the biodegradable matrix (discounting substances other than polymer building blocks). In other embodiments, the PLA/PGA ratio is between 25:75 and 50:50, between 35:65 and 75:25, between 45:55 and 75:25, between 55:45 and 75:25, between 65:35 and 75:25, between 75:25 and 35:65, between 75:25 and 45:55, between 75:25 and 55:45, or between 75:25 and 65:25. In other embodiments, the PLA/PGA ratio is between 80:20 and 90:10, inclusive.
In other embodiments, the PLA/PGA ratio is larger than 75:25, between 75:25 and 85:15, or between 75:25 and 95:5. Alternatively, the ratio is smaller than 25:75, between 25:75 and 15:85, or between 25:75 and 5:95.
In other embodiments, the polymer comprises a polymer selected from the group consisting of poly(glycolide-co-lactide) (PLGA), polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG). In other embodiments, the polymer comprises both PLA and PEG (poly(ethylene glycol)).
In other embodiments, tri-block PLA-PCL-PLA is used. PCL denotes poly-caprolactone.
In other embodiments, Poly(D,L-lactide) (DL-PLA), poly(D,L-glycolide), or poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) is used, each of which is considered a separate embodiment.
Design of biodegradable controlled drug-delivery carriers containing PLA, PGA, PEG, and/or PCL to have a specified release profile is well-within the ability of those skilled in the art, and is described inter alia in Makadia and Siegel, Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) as Biodegradable Controlled Drug Delivery Carrier, Polymers 2011, 3:1377-1397.
In another embodiment, the polymer is a polymer described in paragraphs 0076-0078 of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
In some embodiments, a polymer used in the methods and compositions described herein has a molecular weight (MW) of greater than 5 kilodaltons (kDa). In other embodiments, the MW is greater than 50 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW is greater than 7 kDa, greater than 10 kDa, greater than 15 kDa, greater than 20 kDa, greater than 30 Da, greater than 70 kDa, greater than 100 kDa, greater than 150 kDa, or greater than 200 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW is between 5-100 kDa, inclusive, between 7-80 kDa, inclusive, between 10-60 kDa, inclusive, between 20-50 kDa, inclusive, or between 25-50 kDa, inclusive. As provided herein (Example 2), very slow release (approximately 6 months) can be achieved, PLGA of high PLA:PGA ratio, such as 90:10, and MW (molecular weight) higher than 50 KDa. A similar effect can be achieved by use of PLA.
In some embodiments, the polymer is L-PLA that has a molecular weight of greater than 5 kilodaltons (kDa). In other embodiments, the MW of the L-PLA is greater than 50 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW is greater than 7 kDa, greater than 10 kDa, greater than 15 kDa, greater than 20 kDa, greater than 30 Da, greater than 70 kDa, greater than 100 kDa, greater than 150 kDa, or greater than 200 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW of the L-PLA is between 5-100 kDa, inclusive, between 7-80 kDa, inclusive, between 10-60 kDa, inclusive, between 20-50 kDa, inclusive, or between 25-50 kDa, inclusive.
In some embodiments, the polymer is PLGA that has a molecular weight of greater than 5 kilodaltons (kDa). In other embodiments, the MW of the PLGA is greater than 50 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW is greater than 7 kDa, greater than 10 kDa, greater than 15 kDa, greater than 20 kDa, greater than 30 Da, greater than 70 kDa, greater than 100 kDa, greater than 150 kDa, or greater than 200 kDa. In other embodiments, the MW of the PLGA is between 5-100 kDa, inclusive, between 7-80 kDa, inclusive, between 10-60 kDa, inclusive, between 20-50 kDa, inclusive, or between 25-50 kDa, inclusive.
In some embodiments, the polymer has a PLA:PGA ratio of between 80:20 and 90:10, inclusive, for example 80:20, 82:18, 84:16, 86:14, 88:12, or 90:10, and a MW of greater than 50 KDa, for example greater than 50 Da, greater than 70 kDa, greater than 100 kDa, greater than 150 kDa, or greater than 200 kDa. In other embodiments, the polymer has a PLA:PGA ratio larger than 75:25, for example 76:24, 78:22, 80:20, 82:18, 84:16, 86:14, 88:12, 90:10, 92:8, 94:6, 96:4, or 98:2, and a MW of greater than 50 KDa. In yet other embodiments, the polymer has a PLA:PGA ratio smaller than 25:75, inclusive, for example 24:76, 22:78, 20:80, 18:82, 16:84, or 14:86, 12:88, 10:90, 8:92, 6:94, 4:96, or 2:98, and a MW of greater than 50 KDa. Each of the aforementioned PLA:PGA ratio may be freely combined with each MW value.
Additives
In other embodiments, the biodegradable matrix further comprises an additive for modulating hydrophilic-hydrophobic interactions; in other embodiments for enabling dispersion of the drug and eliminating aggregation; in other embodiments for preserving the drug in hot-temperature or cold-temperature storage conditions, for example 55° C. and −20° C., respectively, or significantly colder, in the case of lyophilization with liquid nitrogen; in other embodiments for facilitating creation of cavities in the implant that affect to drug diffusion from the matrix. Hydrophilic-hydrophobic interactions may cause aggregation of the active substance in cases of hydrophilic active substances, such as siRNA, incorporated within a hydrophobic polymer, resulting in aggregation during production or subsequently when the device is implanted into the body of a subject and it is subjected for example to hydrolysis. Non-limiting examples of such additives are open monosaccharides, for example mannitol; disaccharides such as trehalose; sorbitol; and other cyclic monosaccharides such as glucose, fructose, galactose and disaccharides such as sucrose. The above additives, when chiral, may be in the form of the D-enantiomer, the L-enantiomer, or a racemic mixture. Additional, non-limiting examples of such additives are lactose, sucrose, dextran, and hydroxyethyl starch.
In other embodiments, more than one additive is present.
In other embodiments, the biodegradable matrix further comprises an additive for protecting the drug against low pH after implantation. The microenvironment in the implant interior tends to be acidic. Unlike chemotherapy, pH should preferably be maintained above a threshold. While doxorubicin is stable in an acidic environment, with minimal hydrolytic degradation within a pH range of 3 to 6.5, RNAi drugs might degrade at pH<3. In more specific embodiments, this additive may be selected from bicarbonates and carbonates, for example sodium bicarbonate, sodium carbonate, and magnesium hydroxide.
In other embodiments, the biodegradable matrix further comprises a small-molecule therapeutic agent against prostate carcinoma, such as a chemotherapeutic agent. Finasteride is a non-limiting example of a suitable chemotherapeutic agent.
In other embodiments, the DDD comprises an immunotherapy agent (Guo et al and references therein; Clinical Immunotherapy Trials Network www.CITNinfo.com). Non-limiting examples of immunotherapy agents are ipilimumab (Yervoy; Bristol-Myers Squibb), sipuleucel-T (Dendreon Corp, Seattle, Wash.), IL-7, CP-870,893 (Pfizer), Allovectin-7 (Vical), BiovaxID (Biovest International), IMA901 (Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH), MAGE-A3 (GlaxoSmithKline), Multikine (CEL-SCI Corporation), NeuVax (Galena Biopharma), PROSTVAC (Bavarian Nordic A/S), Rindopepimut (CDX-110) (Celldex Therapeutics), Stimuvax (Oncothyreon and Merck KGaA), Talimogene laherparepvec (Amgen), and TG4010 (Transgene and Novartis). In certain embodiments, the immunotherapy agent does not comprise live cells.
Numerous types of immunotherapeutic agents have been developed, and a number of intratumoral immunotherapies are currently being examined in clinical trials (Cancer Immunotherapy Trial Network www.CITNinfo.org). Agents include T-cell and NK-cell growth factors like IL-15, others that stimulate T cells or activate dendritic cells, so-called immune checkpoint inhibitors like ipilimumab, and others that inhibit or neutralize factors secreted by tumors that suppress the immune system. Recently, two agents have been selected to be tested in CITN-led trials, selected from the 20 identified in the CITN 2007 workshop, IL-15 and a dendritic cell-activating monoclonal antibody called CP-870,893.
Immunotherapy agent interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a recombinant agent that is chemically identical or similar to the endogenous cytokine interleukin-15 (IL-15) with immunomodulating activity. IL-15, secreted by mononuclear phagocytes (and some other cell types) following viral infection, regulates T and natural killer cell activation and proliferation. This cytokine induces activation of transcription activators STAT3, STATS, and STATE via JAK kinase signal transduction pathways in mast cells, T cells, and dendritic epidermal T cells.
CP-870,893 is a fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) agonist of the cell surface receptor CD40 with potential immunostimulatory and antineoplastic activities. Similar to the CD40 ligand (CD40L or CD154), CD40 agonist monoclonal antibody CP-870,893 binds to CD40 on a variety of immune cell types, triggering the cellular proliferation and activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), activating B cells and T cells, and enhancing the immune response; in addition, this agent may activate CD40 present on the surfaces of some solid tumor cells, resulting in apoptosis and decreased tumor growth.
Dosage and Drug Percentage
A DDD of the described methods and compositions may, in certain embodiments, contain at least 10 μg siRNA. In other embodiments, the amount is between 10-2000 μg (inclusive) siRNA per device. In more specific embodiments, the amount is between 300-1700 (inclusive) μg siRNA per device. In still other embodiments, the amount is between 300-1100 (inclusive) μg siRNA per device. Alternatively, the amount is between 400-900 (inclusive) μg siRNA per device.
In yet other embodiments, the amount of said RNAi agent in all the DDD's administered as a batch (a single dose) is at least 4 μg, for example at least 5 μg, at least 6 μg, at least 7 μg, at least 8 μg, at least 10 μg, at least 12 μg, or at least 15 μg. In still other embodiments, the amount of RNAi agent present per dose is between 2-10 μg, inclusive, for example 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 μg.
In yet other embodiments, all the DDD's administered as a batch deliver a dose of 0.008-0.065 mg/kg/month, inclusive, for example 0.008 mg/kg/month, 0.01 mg/kg/month, 0.015 mg/kg/month, 0.02 mg/kg/month, 0.03 mg/kg/month, 0.05 mg/kg/month, or 0.065 mg/kg/month.
In certain embodiments, the drug percentage of a device of the described methods and compositions is at least 20%. In another embodiment, the drug percentage is at least 30%, for example 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, or 60%. In another embodiment, the drug percentage is between 8-30%, inclusive, for example 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 22%, 24%, 26%, 28%, or 30%. Some exemplary formulations are as follows:
64-76% PLGA; 16-27% drug; 5-12% mannitol; an exemplary specific formulation is 70% PLGA; 20% drug; 10% mannitol.
In still other embodiments, a DDD of the methods and compositions described herein comprises trehalose and does not comprise mannitol. In still other embodiments, the DDD comprises both trehalose and mannitol. In more specific embodiments, the DDD may contain 70-91.2% PLGA; 8-30% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In other embodiments, the DDD may contain 75-91.2% PLGA; 8-25% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In still other embodiments, the DDD may contain 80-91.2% PLGA; 8-20% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In yet other embodiments, the DDD may contain 85-91.2% PLGA; 8-15% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In additional embodiments, the DDD may contain 88-91.2% PLGA; 8-12% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In yet other embodiments, the DDD may contain 89-91% PLGA; 8-10% siRNA; 0.6-1.5% trehalose; and 0.1-0.4% sodium bicarbonate. In still other embodiments, the DDD may contain about 90% PLGA 85:15, about 9% siG12D, about 1% Trehalose, and about 0.2% NaHCO3.
In other embodiments, the DDD has less than 5% trehalose, for example in different embodiments 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5%, 4%, or 4.5%. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the release profiles and efficacies of DDD's having varying percentages of trehalose can readily be tested in light of the information provided herein.
Sodium bicarbonate is an excipient that in some embodiments facilitates cavity formation. In other embodiments, sodium bicarbonate facilitates modulation of or decrease in pH. An exemplary specific formulation is 70% PLGA; 28% drug; 1% trehalose; 1% sodium bicarbonate and/or >1% of an excipient that facilitates modulation of decrease in pH.
In other embodiments, a trehalose-containing DDD is provided, comprising an siRNA against a target that is not a prostate-cancer-related target gene. In other embodiments, the DDD has less than 5% trehalose, for example in different embodiments 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, 3.5%, 4%, or 4.5%.
Additional Features
In other embodiments, a DDD of the described methods and compositions is coated. A coating can be designed for a number of characteristics, including modulating the release rate or preventing protein stickiness during long-term storage. The coating in some embodiments comprises the same material used to form the matrix, for example a PLGA matrix, only without the drug. In other embodiments, the coating comprises a material similar to that used to form the matrix (for example containing the same building blocks in a different ratio, or containing the same polymer but with a different MW), only without the drug. In other embodiments, the coating comprises the same material used to form the matrix, together with at least one other polymeric material such as PEG. In other embodiments, the coating is selected from polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA:PGA (polyglycolic acid) in a ratio of at least 80:20, inclusive for example 80:20, 82:18, 84:16, 85:15, 86:14, 88:12, 90:10, 92:8, 94:6, 96:4, 98:2, and 99:1, and a MW greater than 50 KDa, for example 60 KDa, 70 KDa, 80 KDa, 100 KDa, 120 KDa, 1500 KDa, or 200 KDa). In more particular embodiments, the coating comprises PLGA in a ratio of at least 80:20, inclusive, having a MW of 50,000-100,000, inclusive.
In certain embodiments, DDD's of dimensions larger than  ̃0.8 mm can be identified by standard ultrasound (US). In other embodiments, materials to visualization in a medical or surgical procedure, for example CT, MRI or US visualization are included. Non-limiting examples of contrast agents are barium, diatrizoate, ethiodized oil, gallium citrate, iocarmic acid, iocetamic acid, iodamide, iodipamide, iodoxamic acid, iogulamide, iohexyl, iopamidol, iopanoic acid, ioprocemic acid, iosefamic acid, ioseric acid, iosulamide meglumine, iosemetic acid, iotasul, iotetric acid, iothalamic acid, iotroxic acid, ioxaglic acid, ioxotrizoic acid, ipodate, meglumine, metrizamide, metrizoate, propyliodone, and thallous chloride.
Activating Device:
Some embodiments include activation via an external device, such as a radiation source or an ultrasound probe, to affect drug release, and/or penetration into cells. Activation can be performed along the time span of the DDD, at a single or several defined time points. The protocol defining such time points can be based on a pre-defined treatment plan and/or changes in patient read-outs. FIG. 6 depicts implantation of DDDs in the external prostate using the ultrasound biopsy procedure. FIG. 7 depicts an exemplary distribution of DDDs, mainly in the peripheral zone.
Other embodiments provide methods of making DDDs described herein. Methods of making various DDD's similar to those presented herein are described in US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
Therapeutic Methods
Also provided herein is a device described herein for treating a prostate carcinoma. In certain embodiments the subject is a human patient. In other embodiments, the subject is a veterinary patient.
In some embodiments, patients treated by the described methods have prostate carcinoma. In more specific embodiments, the patients have a Gleason score between 5-7, inclusive, more preferably 6. In other embodiments, the patients have a PSA level of below about 10 ng/ml (nanograms per milliliter). In other embodiments, they have both a Gleason score of between 5-7, inclusive, more preferably 6, and a PSA level of below 10 ng/ml.
In certain, more specific embodiments, the DDD is designed for implantation into a subject using a biopsy needle via an ultrasound probe. Prostate biopsy is a well-known procedure to those skilled in the art. In certain, still more specific embodiments, the needle is a straight 18 gauge needle, and the number of DDDs implanted is between 8-12, inclusive, for example 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12.
In other embodiments, the DDD is designed for implantation into a subject using a prostate brachytherapy needle. Prostate brachytherapy is a well-known procedure to those skilled in the art. It is described, for example, in paragraph 0142 of US Patent Application Pub. No. 2011/0195123.
In other embodiments, the DDD is designed for implantation into a subject using a delivery device as described in International Patent Publication No. WO 2010/086849 to Silenseed LTD, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiments the drug load in DDD is between 150-300 μg, in another embodiment about 200 μg, per mm length of the DDD.
In other embodiments, a method is provided of treating a subject having prostate carcinoma, comprising the steps of implanting in the subject a DDD described herein.
In certain, more specific embodiments, the DDD is implanted into the subject using a biopsy needle.
In still more specific embodiments, 8-32 DDD per patient are implanted, for example 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, or 32 DDD. In yet more specific embodiments, 12 DDD per patient are implanted.
In other embodiments, the DDD is implanted into the subject using a prostate brachytherapy needle. In some embodiments, patients are implanted with 12 DDD's per treatment using a straight 18 gauge prostate biopsy needle under ultrasound visualization, using the existing transrectal ultrasound and biopsy protocol. The treatment achieves about 3×108 siRNA molecules per cell for a tumor containing 109 cells.
The following steps are performed as one possible exemplary protocol that may be used: This procedure makes use of a needle apparatus containing a hollow beveled straight needle and an inner straight stylet, for example with a rounded head, both of dimension about 30 cm and of 18 gauge diameter. Unlike existing biopsy needles, for example Pro-MagTM 18G×30 cm of Angiotech Inc, the needle preferably has no ‘biopsy gun’ but a basic handle, and a port at its proximal end enabling loading of implants. An additional embodiment is a single needle device combining the two functions of biopsy sampling and DDD implantation. In such a single device the biopsy sampling is based on aspiration. In another embodiment the biopsy sampling is by harvesting histological specimens as is done, for example, with the Tru-Cut® sampling apparatus:

    
    
        Identify the location of the prostate by transrectal US.
        Insert biopsy needle apparatus into endoscope and connect.
        Progress the needle apparatus through the scope into the prostate.
        Fix the needle.
        Withdraw the stylet.
        Load the needle with DDDs at the stylet hub.
        Insert the stylet or optionally a dedicated blunt stylet, and slide DDDs to the distal end.
        Place DDDs at the cylindrical cavity created by the needle
        Repeat the procedure for implanting more DDDs.
        Retract the needle
        Withdraw the system out of the US.
        Withdraw US
    
    


The DDD's are in some embodiments distributed isotropically, but with special care not to puncture the central zone and urethra, and in general not in the inner zones, rather solely or primarily in the peripheral zone.
In other embodiments, the DDD is implanted into the subject using a delivery device as described in WO 2010/086849 to Silenseed Ltd.
In other embodiments, a method of treating cancer is provided, comprising the step of administering to a subject one or more DDD's described herein, comprising one or more delayed-release DDD. In other embodiments, a combination of DDD's is administered, comprising both (a) one or more delayed-release DDD and (b) one or more DDD that is not delayed release. In some embodiments, the cancer is a prostate carcinoma. In other embodiments, the cancer is another cancer. In some embodiments, the cancer is selected from a pancreatic tumor, a colon tumor, a lung tumor, brain cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, endometrial carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, renal carcinoma, biliary carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma. In more specific embodiments, the cancer is selected from pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung carcinoma, and colorectal cancer. Provision of a combination of delayed-release and non-delayed-release DDD's in some embodiments enables a longer time course of significant siRNA release, without the need for repeated therapeutic intervention.
In other embodiments, a trehalose-containing DDD, as described herein is administered, to treat a cancer other than prostate cancer. In some embodiments, the cancer is selected from a pancreatic tumor, a colon tumor, a lung tumor, brain cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, endometrial carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, renal carcinoma, biliary carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma. In more specific embodiments, the cancer is selected from pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, small-cell lung carcinoma, and colorectal cancer.
Animal and Human Testing
In animal models, tumor progress may be monitored by any method known in the art. One method is by removing and weighing the tumor. This may be done, for example, by weighing slices after histology slice preparation.
The presence and amount of therapeutic siRNA in tissue samples may be determined by any method known in the art, for example by a method described herein. RNA quantity may be assessed, for example, by Nanodrop, and RNA quality by gel electrophoresis. RNA quantity may also be assessed by PCR, e.g. real-time PCR, Northern blot, HPLC, MSLC (Membrane surface liquid culture), or in situ hybridization.
Excised tumor tissue from human or animal studies may be preserved by any method known in the art, for example by freezing in liquid nitrogen (for subsequent studies requiring live cells), or may be fixed, for example in paraformaldehyde solution.
Characterization of tissue samples may include various methods known in the art, including but not limited to hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry staining, and measuring levels of gene products, such as the genes targeted by the therapeutic siRNA, in some cases in the presence of an internal control.
In other cases, the effects of devices described herein on the excised tissue sample may be studied, for example in an experimental animal or in culture.
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS SECTION
Example 1
Production of DDD's Containing Anti-Prostate Cancer RNAi Molecules
DDD's containing anti-prostate cancer RNAi molecules were produced in a biological-class hood in a clean room, as follows:
Step 1: Preparation of siRNA/D-Mannitol/Sodium Bicarbonate Mixture:
siRNA was added to the pre-weighed D-Mannitol and Sodium Bicarbonate, and they were dissolved in RNase-free sterile water.
Step 2: Freezing:
The liquid was placed into glass vials, frozen in dry ice, and lyophilized for 48 hours.
Step 3: PLGA Preparation:
PLGA was dissolved in Ethyl Acetate.
Step 4: Combining PLGA with D-Mannitol/Sodium Bicarbonate/siRNA:
The PLGA solution was poured into the glass vial containing the lyophilized D-Mannitol/Sodium Bicarbonate/siRNA in fractions and stirred until homogenization
Step 5: Solvent Evaporation.
The solution was poured into a Teflon-covered dedicated glass dish and left to evaporate inside a dedicated container for 3-5 days.
Step 6: Release of Film:
The film was released from the glass dish using tweezers and a scalpel.
Step 7: Excision of Individual DDDs:
Individual DDDs were excised using a dedicated puncher. Each DDD was of a cylindrical shape, with a length and diameter of  ̃1.3 mm and  ̃0.6 mm, respectively.
Example 2
In Vitro Testing of Release Characteristics of DDDs
FIG. 2 describes variations in release characteristics that were achieved by varying the composition of DDDs. The curve “1% add II” provides a working demonstration of very slow release that can last 6 months, for example using PLGA of high PLA:PGA ratio, such as 90:10, and MW (molecular weight) higher than 50 KDa.
The following protocol was used to make the DDD, covering all cases in FIG. 2:

    
    
        1. Mix siRNA 40 mg (naked, 5′-chol) RNAse free water solution with 1% NaHCO3 (Sigma) and with Mannitol (10% or 5%) or Trehalose (10%, 5% or 1%) and lyophilize overnight.
        2. Weight 450 mg PLGA 85:15 (Boehringer-. Ingelheim), add to the lyophilized powder and mix. The viscosity of the PLGA was 0.63-0.67 dl/gr, and its estimated MW was 60,000-80,000.
        3. Add Ethyl acetate ( ̃1.5 ml) (Sigma) and mix to get clear white solution.
        4. Pour onto Teflon covered glass dish (D=2 cm).
        5. Dry (5-7 days) to get a film.
        6. Punch the film with 19G puncher to get 19G DDDs.

PLGA coating:

        1. Dissolve PLGA 85:15 30% in Ethyl acetate and drip onto each DDD.
        2. Push the DDDs out of the drop after 2 sec.
        3. Dry.
    
    


Measurements of release were done by Nanodrop at a specific wavelength of 260 nm and/or 230 nm. Measurements were taken at time points of 0 h, 4 h, 12 h, 24 h, 3 d, 7 d, 2 w, 4 w, 6 w, and 8 w, and, in some experiments, at additional time points after and between these times. Each measurement utilized 1.5 microliters (μL) of siRNA solution (PBS or water) and results are given in nanogram/microliter. Prior to each measurement, a null measurement of solution only (PBS) was performed for subtraction. Each time point contained five parallel measurements (from five different DDDs). Presented in FIGS. 1-2 are the averages of such five points.
Example 3
Testing of Targets in Cell Culture
Methods
Viability Test
PC3 cells were seeded on 96-well plates one day before transfection. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent, according to the manufacturer's protocol. siRNas were used at the indicated concentration. Scrambled non-targeting siRNA was used as transfection control. 72 hrs post transfection, viable cells were fixed and stained by Methylene Blue (MB). Relative cell amounts were assessed using a microplate absorbance reader. The results are presented relative to cells transfected with scrambled siRNA.
Methylene Blue (MB) Assay
The protocol was adapted from Oliver et al.
Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate, then treated as follows:
1. Remove medium from plate.
2. Wash cells twice with PBS (250-400 ul)
3. Fix cells: Add 100-μ14% formaldehyde. Keep at room temperature for 20 min or for up to several weeks at +4° C. (cold room, wrapped so the liquid will not evaporate).
4. Wash twice with PBS (250-400 μl).
3. Wash cells twice with 200 μl 0.2 M borate buffer, pH 8.5.
4. Stain cells with 50 μl 1% Methylene blue in borate buffer. Incubate for 20 min at room temperature.
5. Wash with tap water until control well (without cells) is white.
6. Color elution: add 100 μl 0.1M HCl. Incubate at room temperature for at least 2 hrs, up to overnight (wrapped so the liquid will not evaporate)
7. Measure OD at 585 nM.
0.2M borate buffer pH 8.5: Add 7.628 gr/100 ml of borate (sodium tetraborate) (Na2B4O7.10H2O; MW 381.3) and 1.2378 gr/100 ml boric acid (H3BO3; MW 61.83). Titrate with NaOH if needed.
0.1M HCl: 50 ml DDW+0.5 ml 37% HCl (=10.1 M)
PBS solution: 0.26 g KH2PO4, 2.17 g Na2HPO4.7H2O, and 8.71 g NaCl in 800 mL dH2O. Adjust pH to 7.4 and bring volume to 1 L with dH2O.
Results
PC3 cells (ATCC #CRL-1435) were grown and tested for mycoplasma contamination, and were found to be mycoplasma free.
Viability testing was done by the MB assay. Based on growth calibration, two cell concentrations of 0.5 and 0.75×104 cells/well were tested with two AR siRNAs. For transfection calibration, cells were seeded at the indicated concentration and transfected at the indicated siRNA concentrations. The optimum concentration was found to be 125 nM, which corresponds to 0.375 μg siRNA/well (FIG. 3).
Next, viability testing was performed with siRNA molecules targeting various prostate carcinoma-related genes. As shown in Table 4 and FIG. 4A, many of the constructs caused growth inhibition. Notably, the 2-O-Me-modified constructs retained a significant amount of activity. Their relative activity compared to non-modified constructs is expected to be greater in vivo, where their resistance to nucleases will be manifested. Furthermore, the effects of anti-BMI-1-2, anti-NETO2-1, and anti-PTPRA-3 on the levels of their target genes were assessed. Each tested siRNA caused a significant decrease in the level of the target (FIGS. 4B-D).







TABLE 4







Viability testing of PC3 cells treated with 


prostate carcinoma-specific siRNA′s.














Average






percentage of



target 
no.
siRNA-name 
viable cells 
stderr %














Androgen
201
siAR-1
43%
2%


receptor
202
siAR-2
48%
4%



204
siAR-4
55%
2%



203
siAR-3
111% 
1%



217
siAR-1-O-Me
71%
2%


BMI1
205
siBMI1-1
94%
4%



206
siBMI1-2
 7%
1%


Brd4
233
siBrd4-2
22.2% 
1.7% 



232
siBrd4-1
37.6% 
1.5% 


CDC44
207
siCDC44-1
98%
8%



208
siCDC44-2
87%
1%


EtbB3
229
siErbB3-2
45.2% 
1.8% 



228
siErbB3-1
50.9% 
25.5%  


EZH2
235
siEZH2-2
34.0% 
2.0% 



234
siEZH2-1
64.8% 
2.1% 


gp130
219
gp130
38%
2%


hTERT
213
si-hTERT-5
50%
6%



211
si-hTERT-3
52%
1%



210
si-hTERT-2
53%
2%



209
si-hTERT-1
58%
2%



212
si-hTERT-4
81%
4%


NETO2
214
siNETO2-1
31%
3%



215
siNETO2-2
53%
3%



216
siNETO2-3
69%
3%



218
siNETO2-1-O-Me
84%
4%


PAPPA
227
PAPPA-3
21%
2%



225
PAPPA-1
34%
3%



226
PAPPA-2
54%
3%


PSCA
231
siPSCA-2
47.6% 
1.0% 



230
siPSCA-1
52.3% 
1.8% 


PTPRA
222
PTPRA-3
33%
1%



224
PTPRA-5
36%
1%



223
PTPRA-4
38%
3%



220
PTPRA-1
72%
1%



221
PTPRA-2
84%
4%









Example 4
Manufacturing and Testing of Trehalose-Containing DDD's
1% Trehalose-containing DDD's were produced as follows:

    1. Dissolve 40 mg siG12D (BioSpring GmbH) in 2 ml DNAse/RNAse free water.


The sequences of the sense and antisense strands of siG12D were GUUGGAGCUGAUGGCGUAGdTdT (SEQ ID No: 108), and CUACGCCAUCAGCUCCAACdTdT (SEQ ID No: 109), respectively.

    2. Add siRNA solution to pre-weighed Trehalose (4 mg.) and NaHCO3 (1 mg) and vortex for several min.
    3. Freeze solution of siG12D, Trehalose and NaHCO3 in liquid nitrogen and lyophilize for 48 h.
    4. Combine 400 mg of lyophilized PLGA with the lyophilized siG12D, Trehalose and NaHCO3 powder and mixed.
    5. Dissolve the mixed powder in 1.5 ml Ethyl acetate to obtain a milky solution. Mix and pour into a Teflon-covered glass dish, diameter 2 cm.
    6. Dry for 3 days to obtain a film.
    7. Punch the film to obtain DDD's.


The final composition was 89.89% PLGA 85:15 (supplier:Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH), 9% siG12D, 1% Trehalose, and 0.22% NaHCO3. DDD dimensions were 2-3 mm×1 mm.
The release profiles of DDD's were measured in vitro at 37° C. in PBS and in vivo. For in vivo testing, C57bl/6 mice were anesthetized using ketamine and xylazine (for a 25-gram mouse, a 50 μl intra-peritoneal injection of 0.9 ml ketamine+0.1 ml xylazine). The DDD's were inserted subcutaneously into a minimal incision made in the skin.
Release in vitro was quantified using a Nanodrop® apparatus. For validation, release from in vivo trials was also quantified by electrophoresis in a 10% urea-acrylamide gel. Gels were visualized using Pharmacia Biotech ImageMasterTM VDS (cat #80-6246-82) and quantified using ImageGauge software.
In vitro, the trehalose-containing DDD's exhibited delayed release, with less than 10% of the siRNA released after 90 days, followed by a steady release of the next 55% of the siRNA over the next 70%. In vivo, these DDD's steadily released about 90% of the siRNA over the first 90 days, followed by a slower release of most of the remaining siRNA over the next 70 days (FIG. 5).
Example 5
Effect of Anti-BMI-1 and Anti-hTERT siRNA on Various Cancer Cell Lines
Anti BMI-1 (si-BMI1) and anti-hTERT siRNAs were administered to several cancer cell lines, and the effect on cell viability was tested. The cell lines used included prostate, pancreas, colon (two lines), lung (two lines), neuroblastoma, embryonic kidney, and hepato-cellular carcinoma lines, as follows:
PC3 Human prostate adenocarcinoma.
Panc1 Human pancreatic ductal carcinoma.
HT29 Human colorectal adenocarcinoma.
H460 Human large cell lung carcinoma.
SHY86 Human neuroblastoma.
HEK293T Human embryonic kidney.
Huh7 Human hepatocellular carcinoma.
H1299 Human non-small cell lung carcinoma.
RKO Human colon carcinoma.
Experimental Description
The indicated cell lines were seeded in a 96-well plate one day before transfection. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent. The indicated siRNAs were used at a 125-nM concentration, which is 0.375-μg/well. Scrambled non-targeting siRNA was used as transfection control. 72 hrs post-transfection the reaction was stopped, viable cells were fixed and stained by Methylene Blue. Relative cell amounts were assessed using a microplate absorbance reader) (Tecan Group Ltd, model Infinite F50), and data was processed using the Magellan program (Tecan). The siRNA's were each effective in a number of cancer cell lines (FIG. 10). The results are presented relative to scrambled siRNA-transfected cells.
Example 6
Further In Vitro Testing of Targets
Following transfection with siRNA, siRNA functionality is measured by proliferation assay, colony-forming assay, and in other experiments by scratch assay, for example in PC3 cells, LNCaP cells, DU145 cells, or one or more of the other cell lines mentioned herein. In some experiments, kinetic studies are performed.
In other experiments, target mRNA inhibition is measured, for example using semi-quantitative PCR or quantitative PCR.
In other experiments, the effect on target protein level is measured, for example by Western blotting.
In other experiments, the stability of siRNAs in a RNase-rich environment is studied by incubation in a RNase-rich environment, followed by analysis of siRNA content, for example by gel electrophoresis.
In other experiments, siRNAs are modified to improve their stability and functionality, and their efficacy and stability are tested.
In other experiments, the release rate of siRNA is determined, for example using the methods described herein.
In other experiments, the effect of the siRNA's is tested in cancer stem cells, for example by colony forming ability, proliferation assay, or apoptosis assay.
Example 7
In Vivo Testing of DDDs Against Prostate Cancer
One or more DDDs are implanted in a mouse xenograft tumor model or other suitable model for prostate carcinoma. Tumor progress and/or the amount of therapeutic siRNA are monitored by methods known in the art. In some experiments, measurement of tumor volume is used to follow tumor growth. In other experiments, the survival of mice bearing the tumor is followed.
In other experiments, an orthotopic model is utilized to follow tumor growth during and after treatment with siRNA's.
Example 8
Testing of DDDs Against Prostate Cancer in Humans
Humans with prostate cancer are implanted with DDD's described herein, and the anti-tumor activity is tested. In some experiments, patients having a Gleason score of  ̃6 and PSA up to 10 are selected.
Example 9
Testing of Trehalose-Containing DDDs
Trehalose-containing DDDs are tested in an animal model, or in other experiments in human subjects, using an appropriate experimental setup, relative to mannitol-containing DDD's. Impaired tumor growth is indicative of enhanced therapeutic efficacy.
Example 10
Testing of Delayed-Release DDDs
Delayed-release DDDs are tested in an animal model, or in other experiments in human subjects, using an appropriate experimental setup, relative to non-delayed-release DDDs. In some experiments, delayed-release DDDs are implanted together with non-delayed-release DDDs, and are compared to non-delayed-release DDDs alone. siRNA release and tumor progression are monitored. A longer time course of significant siRNA release and/or impaired tumor growth are indicative of enhanced therapeutic efficacy.
It will be apparent that the precise details of the methods and compositions described herein may be varied or modified without departing from the spirit of the described invention. We claim all such modifications and variations that fall within the scope and spirit of the claims below, including all equivalents thereof.
REFERENCES


    1. Biodegradable Intraprostatic Doxorubicin Implants, Ronnie Ortiz, 1, 2 Jessie L-S. Au, 1, 3 Ze Lu, 1, 4 Yuebo Gan, 1 and M. Guillaume Wientjes. The AAPS Journal 2007; 9(2) Article 27.
    2. Drug Resistance and the Solid Tumor Microenvironment Olivier Tredan, Carlos M. Galmarini, Krupa Patel, Ian F. Tannock, J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1441-54.
    3. Bergan and Scheidt, Inhibition And Treatment Of Prostate Cancer Metastasis. US Application Pub. No. 2009/0124569.
    4. Patrawala et al, Highly purified CD44+ prostate cancer cells from xenograft human tumors are enriched in tumorigenic and metastatic progenitor cells. Oncogene (2006) 25:1696-1708).
    5. M. H. Oliver et al, “A rapid convenient assay for counting cells cultures in microwell plates: application for assessment of growth factors.” Journal of Cell Science 92, 513-519 (1989).
    6. Guo et al., In situ vaccination with CD204 gene-silenced dendritic cell, not unmodified dendritic cell, enhances radiation therapy of prostate cancer.” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Nov. 6. [Epub ahead of print].
    7. Terrone et al, Penetratin and related cell-penetrating cationic peptides can translocate across lipid bilayers in the presence of a transbilayer potential. Biochemistry. 2003 Dec. 2; 42(47):13787-99.
    8. Magzoub et al, Interaction and structure induction of cell-penetrating peptides in the presence of phospholipid vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001 May 2; 1512(1):77-89.
    9. Pooga et al, Cell penetration by transportan. FASEB J. 1998 January; 12(1):67-77.

## Claims

1. A millimeter-scale drug delivery device (DDD) comprising:
A biodegradable polymeric matrix comprising a mixture of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA), wherein the PLA:PGA ratio is 50:50, or between 65:35 and 95:5, inclusive; and
An RNAi (RNA interference) agent incorporated within said biodegradable polymeric matrix, wherein the RNAi agent comprises a sense strand and an antisense strand, and wherein the sequences of the sense strand and the antisense strand target a gene sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 14 (NETO2), SEQ ID NO: 20 (PTPRA), and SEQ ID NO: 31 (Brd4).

2. The DDD of claim 1, wherein the sequences of the sense strand and the antisense strand target SEQ ID NO: 14 (NETO2).

3. The DDD of claim 1, wherein said DDD comprises RNAi agents targeting at least one additional gene sequence, selected from the group consisting of: SEQ ID NO: 1 (Androgen receptor), SEQ ID NO: 5 (BMI1), SEQ ID NO: 14 (NETO2), SEQ ID NO: 25 (PAPPA), SEQ ID NO: 20 (PTPRA), SEQ ID NO: 31 (Brd4), SEQ ID NO: 33 (EZH2), SEQ ID NO: 17 (130), SEQ ID NO: 27 (ErbB3), and SEQ ID NO: 29 (PSCA).

4. The DDD of claim 1, wherein said DDD further comprises an RNAi agent targeting a gene selected from the group consisting of EGFR, VEGF, and AURKB.

5. The DDD of claim 1, wherein the sense and the antisense strands of the RNAi agent each have a dTdT overhang at the 3′-end.

6. The DDD of claim 1, wherein said RNAi agent is chemically modified with a modification selected from the group consisting of 2′-O-methyl (2′-OMe), 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) (MOE) and 2′-fluorine.

7. The DDD of claim 1, wherein said siRNA is conjugated to a molecule selected from the group consisting of a cholesterol moiety, spermine, hydrophobized hyaluronic acid-spermine conjugates (HHSCs), or alpha-tocopherol-vitamin E, or a cell penetrating peptide; or complexed with a cationic molecule.

8. The DDD of claim 1, wherein the biodegradable matrix further comprises 5%-12% mannitol.

9. The DDD of claim 1, wherein said PLA and PGA are present in a ratio of between 80:20 and 90:10, inclusive, and said polymer has a molecular weight of greater than 50 KDa.

10. The DDD of claim 1, further comprising a pH-modulating additive.

11. The DDD of claim 1, further comprises 0.5%-5%, or 10% trehalose.

12. The DDD of claim 1, further comprising a coating comprising an additional biodegradable polymer.

13. The DDD of claim 1, further comprising a therapeutic agent selected from the group consisting of a small-molecule therapeutic agent, a chemotherapy agent, and an immunotherapy agent against prostate carcinoma.

14. The DDD of claim 1, wherein 95% of said RNAi agent is released from said DDD over a time period between 3-24 months, inclusive.

15. The DDD of claim 1, wherein less than 50% of said RNAi agent is released from said DDD over a time period of 1 month starting from implantation.

16. The DDD of claim 1, wherein less than 75% of said RNAi agent is released from said DDD over a time period of three months starting from implantation.

17. A method of treating a prostate carcinoma, comprising the step of implanting the DDD of claim 1 into the prostate of said subject, thereby treating a prostate carcinoma.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein said DDD's are implanted into said subject via an apparatus selected from the group consisting of ultrasound apparatus and a seed implantation prostate brachytherapy apparatus, using a needle.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the number of DDDs per treatment is determined to achieve a dose of 0.008-0.065 mg/kg/month.