alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., as Trustee, etc., Appellant and Respondent, against William S. Miller et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents and Appellants.

Argued May 17, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*508*Abraham N. Getter*and *Irving Sonnenschein*for appellant and respondent.

■ *Robert H. Schaffer, Acting Corporation Counsel (Arthur H. Goldberg, Arthur A. Segall*and *Edmund B. Hennefeld*of counsel), for respondents and appellants.

Order affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.*

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

*

 In the above ease, and also in three other companion eases argued on the same day, namely, *People ex rel. Bryant Park Building, Inc.,*v. *Miller,*291 N. Y. 528; *People ex rel. Prudential Insurance Co.*v. *Lilly,*291 N. Y. 600, and *People ex rel. MacCracken*v. *Miller,*291 N. Y. 55, the city contended that *“the*Appellate Division may not substitute its finding of value for the finding of the trial Justice unless the latter finding is clearly contrary to the weight of the credible evidence,” citing *Matter of City of New York (Newtown Creek),*284 N. Y. 493. Lehman, Ch. J., in his opinion in the *MacCracken*case, rejected such contention, saying: “We find no authority in the cited case or in other cases decided by this court for any differentiation in the powers of the Appellate Division to review and set aside findings of value by the Special Term in a certiorari proceeding and its powers to reverse findings of fact made by Special Term in any other special proceedings or actions.” (291 N. Y. 55, 60.) — [Rep.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BellaVista Capital,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William Offenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Corporation.


/s/ JEFFREY BLACK
--------------------------------
Jeffrey Black, Chief Financial Officer of BellaVista Capital, Inc.
January 21, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

## Notice of Partially Closed Meeting

The Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on March 17, 2022, 10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, via teleconference. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to materials and related technology.

## Agenda

### Open Session

1. Opening Remarks and Introduction by BIS Senior Management.

2. Report from working groups.

3. Report by regime representatives.

### Closed Session

4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. §§ 10 (a)(1) and 10 (a)(3).

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yvette.Springer@bis.doc.gov,*                     no later than March 10, 2022.                

To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the materials should be forwarded prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.

The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 14, 2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. § 10(d)), that the portion of the meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.

For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-04163 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6154

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL TRAVIS WIGGINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (1:00-cr-330-2; 1:05-cv-456-FWB-WWD)

Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Travis Wiggins, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Travis Wiggins seeks to appeal the district

court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Wiggins has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We deny Wiggins’s motion for release pending

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -

DISMISSED
ex10-4_051412.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.4







[Letterhead of BCB Community Bank]







May 10, 2012







Amer Saleem, Chief Lending Officer


BCB Community Bank


104-110 Avenue C


Bayonne, NJ 07002








	
  

	
RE:

	
BCB COMMUNITY BANK/AMER







SALEEM/EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







Dear Amer:







Pursuant to the vote of the Board of Directors ("Board") of BCB Community Bank ("BCB") at last night's Board meeting, please be advised that the Board, pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Employment Agreement between BCB Community Bank and Amer Saleem, dated as of July 6, 2010 ("Agreement"), has elected not to extend the term of the Agreement, and hereby gives you written notice of its non-renewal of the Agreement.







Thank you.








	  	
Very truly yours,


	  	  
	  	
/s/ John J. Brogan, Esq.


	  	  
	  	
JOHN J. BROGAN, ESQ.


	  	
GENERAL COUNSEL


	  	
BCB COMMUNITY BANK

















INTER-OFFICE DELIVERY


JBrogan/server/Executive Agreements.Letter to Amer Saleem.5.10.12
#### GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Garmin USA, Inc., Garmin Corporation, Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee *625Navico Inc., Navico Holding AS, Intervenors

2016-2584

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: June 13, 2017

Nicholas P. Groombridge, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by Jennifer H. Wu, Jennifer Diane Cieluch; David J. Ball, Jr., David K. Stark, Washington, DC.

Megan Michele Valentine, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Dominic L. Bianchi, Wayne W. Herring-ton, Sidney A. Rosenzweig.

Kirk T. Bradley, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Matthew S. Stevens, Christopher Charles Ziegler.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Dyk, and Reyna, Circuit Judges.

Reyna, Circuit Judge.

In one of three appeals from a Section 337 investigation, Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., and Garmin Corporation (collectively, “Garmin”) appeal from a Modified Limited Exclusion Order (“Modified Order”) of the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) prohibiting entry into the United States of products and components of products infringing various claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,305,840 (“’840 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,605,550 (“’550 patent”).

Our decision today in a related case, *Garmin International Inc. v. International Trade Commission,*No. 16-1572, reverses the Commission’s finding of validity and finds all of the patent claims referenced by the Modified Order invalid as obvious over the prior art. Because we have already reversed the Commission’s underlying decision, we *dismiss*this appeal as moot.

DISMISSED

Costs

No costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2054

ERMA FRAZIER,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANGELA REPASS; MELISSA SMITH; REGINA KELLY; KAROL SEILER; 

DAVID REPASS; SALVATION ARMY DHQ; REGINA DAVIS,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-03356-JMC)

Submitted: November 21, 2013 Decided: November 25, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erma Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Winters, JOAN 

ELIZABETH WINTERS LAW OFFICES, Chester, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Erma Frazier appeals the district court’s order 

entering judgment in favor of the remaining Appellees in 

accordance with the jury’s verdict on Frazier’s claim of 

retaliation and directing judgment in favor of the Appellees on 

Frazier’s claims of race and age discrimination. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the judgment of the district court and deny Frazier’s 

motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
MEMORANDUM

TO: Public Record for the NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

EPA Docket Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0274 (www.regulations.gov)

FROM: Carey A. Johnston, P.E.

USEPA/OECA/OC

ph: (202) 566 1014

johnston.carey@epa.gov

DATE: 14 May 2014

SUBJECT: Summary of Recent EPA CROMERR Processing Times for State Application of 

EPA’s NetDMR Electronic Reporting Tool Using the Standard Checklist [DCN 

0109]

The table below provides information on the processing time for EPA to approve the use 

of its electronic reporting tool, NetDMR (www.epa.gov/netdmr/), for an authorized state 

NPDES program. The range for EPA to approve use of NetDMR for an authorized state NPDES 

program is 13 to 21 weeks. 

These CROMERR approvals were conducted with a checklist to expedite processing. EPA 

developed this checklist for states to use for their CROMERR approval packages that specify use 

of EPA’s electronic systems (e.g., NetDMR, NPDES Electronic reporting system (NeT), CROMERR 

shared services, Attorney General Statement and Signature Agreements). Use of the checklist 

for these CROMERR approval packages applications only requires the authorized state NPDES 

programs to complete a small amount of state-specific information. 
Table 1: EPA CROMERR Processing Times for State Application of EPA’s NetDMR Electronic Reporting Tool

Application Name Organization Name State/Territory EPA 

Region

Receipt 

Date

Approval 

Date

Weeks to 

approval

RI DEM National Network Discharge Monitoring 

Report System NetDMR - Original

Rhode Island Department of 

Environmental Management Rhode Island 1 11/13/2013 2/14/2014 13

LA DEQ Network Discharge Monitoring Report 

System NetDMR - Original

Louisiana Department of 

Environmental Quality Louisiana 6 12/17/2008 4/27/2009 19

IN IDEM Network Discharge Monitoring Report 

System NetDMR - Original

Indiana Department of 

Environmental Management Indiana 5 7/20/2011 12/9/2011 20

MD MDE Network Discharge Monitoring Report 

System NetDMR - Original

Maryland Department of the 

Environment Maryland 3 12/9/2010 5/4/2011 21

SD DENR Electronic Document Receiving System 

EDRS / NetDMR - Original

South Dakota Department of 

Environment and Natural 

Resources

South Dakota 8 12/9/2010 5/4/2011 21
15420

#### SIMPKINS v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY CO.

(20 S. E. (2d), 733)

*230January, 1942.

*245
      *Mr. Norbert A. Theodore*and *Mr. Heyward Brockinton,*both of Columbia, Counsel for Appellant,

*Messrs. Sloan & S'loan,*of Columbia, Counsel for Respondent,

*246June 2, 1942.

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice Boni-iam.

The order of Judge Bellinger in this case bears evidence of thorough study and logical conclusion. In our judgment he has reached the correct disposition of the issues Involved, and it would be useless for us to add anything to it.

It is affirmed, and it is ordered that it be reported as the judgment of this Court.

Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne and StukES, and Circuit Judges Philip H. Stoll and E. H. Henderson, Acting Associate Justices, concur.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                    BRAUN CONSULTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                STATEMENT RE. COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNT)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      2001                        2000                        1999
                            -------------------------   -------------------------   -------------------------
                               BASIC        DILUTED        BASIC        DILUTED        BASIC        DILUTED
                            -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                         <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Pro forma net income
  (loss)..................  $   (25,044)  $   (25,044)  $   (14,589)  $   (14,589)  $     2,020   $     2,020
                            ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
Shares used in computing
  earnings (loss) per
  share...................   20,483,868    20,483,868    19,372,159    19,372,159    13,979,808    13,979,808
Effect of shares issuable
  under stock options
  based on the treasury
  stock method............           --       784,762            --     1,327,637            --     1,361,001
                            -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
                             20,483,868    21,268,630    19,372,159    20,699,796    13,979,808    15,340,809
Pro forma earnings (loss)
  per share(1)............  $     (1.22)  $     (1.22)  $     (0.75)  $     (0.75)  $      0.14   $      0.13
                            ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========   ===========
</Table>
----------
(1) Common stock equivalents are not considered in the calculation of
    earnings (loss) per share--diluted in 2000 and 2001, since their effect
    is anti-dilutive.
Exhibit 99.11







TO:  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
  AND TO:    Keegan Resources Inc.
  Re:   Keegan Resources Inc. (the "Company")
 Annual Report on Form 40-F
 Consent of Expert




This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended March 31, 2012 and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”), to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the
 year ended March 31, 2012 (the “Annual Information Form”).
 
 I, Harry Warries, MSc (Mining), (FAusIMM), do hereby consent, to:-
 
 ●the use of my name and the disclosure of my involvement in the preparation of information that forms the basis for all disclosure of a technical and scientific nature related to the Company’s Esaase Project contained in the Annual Information Form; and
 
 ●the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such information in the Annual Report.
  Dated this 29thday of June 2012
  
 /s/ Harry Warries
 Signature of Qualified Person
 
 Harry WarriesMSc (Mining), (FAusIMM)
 Principal Consultant – Mine Engineering
 Coffey Mining Pty Ltd.








Coffey Mining Pty LtdABN 52 065 481 209
 1162 Hay Street, West Perth WA 6005 Australia
 PO Box 1671, West Perth WA 6872 Australia
 T (+61) (8) 9324 8800 F (+61) (8) 9324 8877 coffey.com
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6670 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6670

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations 
   with respect to the minimum age of a driver of a commercial motor 
                    vehicle, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2023

 Mrs. Hinson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue certain regulations 
   with respect to the minimum age of a driver of a commercial motor 
                    vehicle, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reciprocity Efficiency and Age 
Limitation Trucking Act'' or the ``REAL Trucking Act''.

SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue such 
regulations as are necessary to update sections 383.5 and 390.5T of 
title 49, United States Code, to reduce the minimum age for an operator 
of a commercial motor vehicle from 21 years of age to 18 years of age.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 23022 of the Infrastructure 
Investment and Jobs Act (49 U.S.C. 31315 note) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Omni Medical Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB-A1 for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Arthur D. Lyons, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 12/15/2004                          /s/Arthur D. Lyons
      ----------                         -------------------
                                         Arthur D. Lyons
                                         President, Treasurer and director
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6825 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to raise the offering amount threshold 

for when issuers using the crowdfunding exemption are required to file 

financial statements reviewed by a public accountant who is independent 

of the issuer, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. MEUSER (for himself, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. NUNN of 

Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to raise the offering 

amount threshold for when issuers using the 

crowdfunding exemption are required to file financial 

statements reviewed by a public accountant who is independent of the issuer, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amendment for 

5 Crowdfunding Capital Enhancement and Small-business 

6 Support Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘ACCESS Act of 2023’’. 

2 

•HR 6825 IH

1 SEC. 2. OFFERING THRESHOLD FOR REVIEWS BY PUBLIC 

2 ACCOUNTANT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4A(b)(1)(D) of the Secu4 rities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d–1(b)(1)(D)) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ each place such term appears and 

6 inserting ‘‘$250,000’’. 

7 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 4A of the Se8 curities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77d–1) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘section 4(6)’’ each place such 

10 term appears and inserting ‘‘section 4(a)(6)’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘section 4(6)(B)’’ each place 

12 such term appears and inserting ‘‘section 

13 4(a)(6)(B)’’. 

Æ