alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.9




VIA EDGAR




TO:          United States Securities and Exchange Commission




Re:           Asanko Gold Inc. (the "Company")


Annual Report on Form 40-F


Consent of Expert




This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the financial year ended December 31, 2012, and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”), as filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Information Form”), and the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis for the financial years ended December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012 (the “MD&A”).




I, Charles J. Muller (SACNASP), DO HEREBY CONSENT, to:




·
the use of my name and the disclosure of my involvement in the preparation of information that forms the basis for disclosure of a technical and scientific nature related to the Company’s Esaase gold project, Ghana, contained in the Annual Information Form and the MD&A; and




·
the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such information in the Annual Report.






Dated March 28, 2013







/s/ Charles J. Muller  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —


Charles J. Muller (SACNASP)


Director – Mineral Resources


Minxcon (Pty) Ltd.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 3, 2022.

# PLACE:

 The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

                    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory,                           ( print page 11494)                        examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

 Dated: February 24, 2022.

Eduardo A. Aleman, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-04325 Filed 2-25-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6824 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6824

To require the Attorney General to submit to the Congress a report that 
includes the demographic data of persons determined to be ineligible to 
    purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the 
           National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2023

  Mr. Massie introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Attorney General to submit to the Congress a report that 
includes the demographic data of persons determined to be ineligible to 
    purchase a firearm based on a background check performed by the 
           National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NICS Data Reporting Act''.

SEC. 2. NICS REPORT.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and 
annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee 
on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of 
the House of Representatives a report that includes, with respect to 
the preceding year, the demographic data of persons who were determined 
to be ineligible to purchase a firearm based on a background check 
performed by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, 
including race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, 
disability, average annual income, and English language proficiency, if 
available.
                                 <all>
```
#### Margarita Yamileth RIVAS-PORTILLO, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60553 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 1, 2017

*441Randy Olen, Esq., Olen Law Offices, Providence, RI, for Petitioner

Rachel Louise Browning, Rosanne M. Perry, Trial Attorneys, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BARKSDALE, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Margarita Yamileth Rivas-Portillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the denial of her motion to reopen her *in absentia*removal proceedings, under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a. She claims the Board,of Immigration Appeals (BIA) erred by affirming the denial of her motion.

An alien may be ordered removed *in absentia*if she fails to appear for her scheduled hearing after receipt of proper notice, and if the Government establishes she is removable. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(A). An *in absentia*removal order may be rescinded upon a motion to reopen if the alien demonstrates the failure to appear was because of “exceptional circumstances”. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i).

There was no abuse of discretion in denying Rivas’ motion to reopen. *Barrios-Cantarero v. Holder,*772 F.3d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 2014). Rivas’ mistaken belief her hearing would be transferred and rescheduled is not an exceptional circumstance justifying the reopening of her proceedings. *De Morales v. INS,*116 F.3d 145, 148 (5th Cir. 1997). Additionally, the BIA’s order “reflect[s] meaningful consideration of the relevant substantial evidence supporting the alien’s claims”. *Abdel-Masieh v. INS,*73 F.3d 579, 585 (5th Cir. 1996).

DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Veronica Saunders, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 878]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered March 14, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted that portion of defendant’s motion to direct plaintiff to appear for a statutory hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and that portion of the order directing plaintiff to appear for a statutory hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h vacated.

Inasmuch as New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) has failed to produce any proof that it served plaintiff with a notice for a hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, the IAS court erred in directing plaintiff to appear for such a hearing *(see Kelly v New York City Hous. Auth.,*248 AD2d 594, 595 [1998]). Even if such notice were properly served upon plaintiff, by failing to raise plaintiffs failure to appear at the hearing as an affirmative defense, NYCTA waived its right to defend the action on that ground *(see Hoffman v New York City Hous. Auth.,*187 AD2d 334, 338 [1992]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 684 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 684

  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit the award of 
     Federal funds to institutions of higher education that employ 
   instructors funded by the Chinese Communist Party, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2023

 Mr. Steube (for himself and Mr. Self) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit the award of 
     Federal funds to institutions of higher education that employ 
   instructors funded by the Chinese Communist Party, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Higher Education from 
Foreign Threats Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF INSTRUCTORS FUNDED BY THE CHINESE 
              COMMUNIST PARTY.

    Title I of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001 et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 117 the following:

``SEC. 117A. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF INSTRUCTORS FUNDED BY THE 
              CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY.

    ``(a) Restriction on Eligibility.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, no institution of higher education shall be eligible 
to receive funds or any other form of financial assistance under any 
Federal program for an award year in which the institution employs an 
CCP-funded instructor.
    ``(b) Resumption of Eligibility.--An institution of higher 
education that loses eligibility to receive funds for an award year as 
described in subsection (a) may regain eligibility to receive such 
funds in a subsequent award year by demonstrating, to the satisfaction 
of the Secretary, that the institution no longer employs a CCP-funded 
instructor.
    ``(c) CCP-Funded Instructor Defined.--In this section, the term 
`CCP-funded instructor' means a professor, teacher, or any other 
individual who--
            ``(1) provides instruction directly to the students of an 
        institution of higher education; and
            ``(2) received funds, directly or indirectly, from the 
        Chinese Communist Party while employed by such institution.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
MANDALAY DIGITAL GROUP, INC.
	AMENDED AND RESTATED 2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
	 
	NOTICE OF GRANT AND STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
	 


 


	Name:	 	 	Option Number:	 
	Address:	 	 	Plan Name:	Amended and Restated 2011
 Equity Incentive Plan
	Employee ID:	 	 	 	 


 


Effective
__________, 20__, (“Grant Date”), you have been granted [incentive/non-qualified] stock option to purchase ___________(
________) shares of Mandalay Digital Group, Inc. common stock at an Exercise Price of $ ______ per share pursuant to the Mandalay
Digital Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Except as otherwise defined
herein, terms with initial capital letters shall have the same meanings
set forth in the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached to this Notice and Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Plan are incorporated
herein by this reference.


 


[Insert vesting schedule]


 


By accepting this grant and exercising
any portion of the Option, you represent that you: (i) agree to the terms and conditions of this Notice and Agreement and the Plan;
(ii) have reviewed the Plan and the Notice and Agreement in their entirety, and have had an opportunity to obtain the advice of
legal counsel and/or your tax advisor with respect thereto; (iii) fully understand and accept all provisions hereof; (iv) agree
to accept as binding, conclusive, and final all of the Administrator’s decisions regarding, and all interpretations of, the
Plan and the Notice and Agreement; and (v) agree to notify the Company upon any change in your home address indicated above.


 


Please return a signed copy of
this Notice of Grant and Stock Option Agreement to [insert contact name and address], and retain a copy for your records.


  


	For Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.:	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:	 	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 
	Participant:	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name:
# '.

SERVED: APRIL 30, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD.

FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046
ORDER GRANTING COMPLAINANT'S MOTION 

### o ·'"l.**~** l r L· 1

ComplainantFederal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has movedthat the hearing, now set to begin on June 25, 2013, be re-scheduled to a later date. In support it cites schedule conflicts. ComplainantMotion is hereby GRANTED. The hearing is hereby postponed, andwill be scheduled on a later date which will be set by subsequent order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List2

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1 ONE COPY Charles R. Barnett III, Respondent's Counsel Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 TEL: 847-809-9520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Jeanette

### B. Daubaras, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region Federal Aviation Administration 2300 EastDevon Avenue Des Plaines, AL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7313 FAX: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366:-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0046 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 31


Re: GSAMP Trust 2006-S6 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2006-S6, issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
October 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage
Securities Corp., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer"), and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee
(the "Trustee")


I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and the
Servicer.



                                              Date: March 29, 2007


                                              /s/ Michelle Gill
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Michelle Gill
                                              Vice President
                                              GS Mortgage Securities Corp.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Thomas M. Dougherty, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AirGate PCS, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 15, 2005
/s/ Thomas M. Dougherty
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary ofTransportation

Jim Talbert Airport Manager, Alamogordo-White Sands Regional Airport 3500 Airport Road Alamogordo, NM 88310

DearMr. Talbert: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590



### FEB 182015

Thank you for yourletter ofNovember 6, 2014, requesting reinstatement bythe Department ofTransportation ("Department") ofAlamogordo/Holloman AirForce Base ("Alamogordo" or "the community") into the Essential Air Service (EAS) program.
You state that Alamogordo's EAS eligibility was terminated inMarch 2012 becausethe per-passenger subsidy exceeded $1,000 perpassenger, but at the time, the community met all otherrequirements for EAS eligibility. Further, you state that for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014, the subsidy perpassenger was $0 and thatthe community continues to meet the otherrequirements for subsidized service under the EAS Program. Thus, you request that Department issue a request for proposals to provide subsidized service between Alamogordo and Dallas/Fort Worth to begin as soon as possible.
49 U.S.C. § 41731(a)(l)(C) requires that all EAS communities, exceptthose inAlaskaor Hawaii, have a subsidy perpassengerunder $1,000 during the most recent fiscal year. Congress did notprovide for a waiver from the $1,000 cap, nor is there a reinstatement provision.
While 49 U.S.C. § 41733(g)(1) provides for areinstatement ofservice, itonly applies to communitiesthat were found ineligible pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 41731(a)(l)(B), which is the requirement that communities average 10 or more enplanements per service day during the mostrecent fiscal year. That was not the reason for Alamogordo's termination from the EAS program. Thus, the Department lacks authority to reinstate the community into the EAS program, as the statute provides no opportunity for reinstatement where a community's EAS eligibility has been terminated for exceeding the $1 ,000 per-passenger subsidy cap.Page 2 Mr. Jim Talbert

While I appreciate thatthe community had hoped for a different outcome, I hope that this information is helpful inunderstanding the reasons for the Department's response. I am placing this letter onwww.regulations.gov in Docket DOT-OST-1996-1901.

Sincerely,

Kevin Schlemmer Chief, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis Division