alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6501 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to improve the calculation 

and reduce the taxpayer cost of payment errors under the supplemental 

nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. FEENSTRA (for himself and Mr. BOST) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to improve 

the calculation and reduce the taxpayer cost of payment 

errors under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snap Back Inaccurate 

5 SNAP Payments Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6501 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM TOLERANCE LEVEL 

2 FOR EXCLUDING SMALL ERRORS. 

3 Section 16(c) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

4 (7 U.S.C. 2025(c)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (A) in subparagraph (A)(ii)— 

7 (i) in subclause (I), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 at the end; 

9 (ii) in subclause (II)— 

10 (I) by inserting ‘‘through fiscal 

11 year 2023’’ after ‘‘thereafter’’; and 

12 (II) by striking the period at the 

13 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (iii) by adding at the end the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(III) for fiscal year 2024 and 

17 each fiscal year thereafter, $0.’’; 

18 (B) in subparagraph (C)— 

19 (i) in the matter preceding clause (i), 

20 by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’; 

21 (ii) in clause (ii)(I), by inserting ‘‘, as 

22 adjusted under subparagraph (H), if appli23 cable’’ after ‘‘agency’’; and 

24 (iii) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘10’’ 

25 and inserting ‘‘25’’; and 

26 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

3 

•HR 6501 IH

1 ‘‘(H) REDUCTION OF PAYMENT ERROR

2 RATE BASED ON PERCENTAGE OF OVERPAY3 MENTS RECOUPED.—In determining the liabil4 ity amount of a State agency under subpara5 graph (C) for fiscal year 2024 and each fiscal 

6 year thereafter, the payment error rate de7 scribed in clause (ii)(I) of that subparagraph 

8 shall be equal to the product obtained by multi9 plying— 

10 ‘‘(i) the payment error rate of the 

11 State agency for that fiscal year; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) the percentage of the total 

13 amount of overpayments of benefits made 

14 by the State agency that are not recouped 

15 by the State agency under paragraph (9) 

16 for that fiscal year.’’; 

17 (2) by redesignating paragraph (9) as para18 graph (10); and 

19 (3) by inserting after paragraph (8) the fol20 lowing: 

21 ‘‘(9) RECOUPMENT OF OVERPAYMENTS.—Each 

22 State agency shall seek to recoup any overpayments 

23 of benefits made to benefit recipients.’’. 

Æ
##### 



DEFERRAL AGREEMENT
  Annual deferred compensation credits:
    
    Up to $100,000Duration of deferral agreement:
    
    4 yearsFirst compensation credit:
    
    Up to $100,000 fully vested and credited effective 09/30/2004Second compensation credit:
    
    Up to $100,000 fully vested and credited effective 09/30/2005Third compensation credit:
    
    Up to $100,000 fully vested and credited effective 09/30/2006Fourth compensation credit:
    
    Up to $100,000 fully vested and credited effective 09/30/2007Total credits over deferral period:
    
    Up to $400,000Expiration date:
    
    09/30/2007
       /s/
Karl W. Singer
Participant
    
    
    
    5/2/04
Date/s/
John E. Long, Jr.
Chief Officer
    
    
    
    5/7/04
Date
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  C ONSTANTINA R AMIREZ M OTA , Petitioner, No. 07-71880

v. Agency No.



#  A79-540-706 M ICHAEL B. M UKASEY , Attorney General of the United States, ORDER

Respondent. 

# 

Filed December 8, 2008
Before: David R. Thompson and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge.*

ORDER The parties having advised this court that they have exhausted attempts to settle this case, and the court’s Circuit Mediator having advised the court that mediation proceedings have terminated, and the parties having requested that the mandate now issue,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mandate in this case shall issue forthwith.

*The Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
16065PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee

Notice of Partially Closed Meeting

    The Materials and Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet 
on March 17, 2022, 10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, via 
teleconference. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions 
that affect the level of export controls applicable to materials and 
related technology.

Agenda

Open Session

    1. Opening Remarks and Introduction by BIS Senior Management.
    2. Report from working groups.
    3. Report by regime representatives.

Closed Session

    4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 
Sec. Sec.  10 (a)(1) and 10 (a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference on a first 
come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to 
Ms. Yvette Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c351a09181809423f1c1e05020b091e2c0e051f4208030f420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d78ea1b2a3a3b2f984a7a5beb9b0b2a597b5bea4f9b3b8b4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>, no later than March 
10, 2022.
    To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral 
statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any 
time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution 
of public presentation materials to Committee members, the materials 
should be forwarded prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on February 
14, 2022, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. Sec.  10(d)), that the portion of the 
meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control 
List and the U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. App. 
Sec. Sec.  10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting 
will be open to the public.
    For more information, contact Yvette Springer via email.

Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-04163 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      | 
|Dated: August 8, 2005 |  | /s/ Fernando Sanchez   
|                      |  | Fernando Sanchez       
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of the written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to ArthroCare Corporation and will be retained by ArthroCare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ARTHOCARE
CORPORATION BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ARTHOCARE
CORPORATION 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          17,851
<SECURITIES>                                     4,162
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,340
<PP&E>                                           1,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,921
<SALES>                                          2,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,261
<CGS>                                            1,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.25)
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Whitton *versus*Daniel F. Harding.

*A*surrender by bail of his principal before a justice of the peace must bo a matter of record, and cannot be proved by paroi evidence.

Scire Facias against the defendant, as bail for one *Sargent*in an action brought against him by the plaintiff before a justice of the peace. A deputy sheriff happened to be present at the time of the trial before the justice; and, soon after the trial was over, *Harding*said he wished to surrender the principal, and afterwards said to the justice that he tendered the body of the principal to the court, and * wished to be discharged from his suretiship. *Sargent*in a few minutes left the court, the justice having taken no measures in consequence of the supposed surrender, nor made any record thereof. Two questions arose at the trial before *Thatcher,*J., at the last September term: I. Whether the facts proved amounted to a surrender; *2.*Whether a surrender, might be proved by paroi evidence.

*Curia.*

Parol evidence is not admissible, to prove a surrender by bail of his principal. Indeed, the surrender itself must be of record, to justify the commitment of the principal, and, being a matter of record, the common rule of requiring the best evidence applies.

By the statute of 1803, c. 133, much formality is required in surrendering bail before a justice of the peace; and these are essential to the warrant of commitment which he is required to issue —a mere order to the officer to take the principal into custody not being sufficient, as in cases of surrender in the higher courts.

To allow the facts to be proved by paroi would be to render a record unnecessary and useless, and would produce much mischief. The plaintiff had judgment. (1)

*Thayer*for the plaintiff.

*Bailey*for the defendant.

(1)

 Vide 1 *Roll.*337,10. — *Hobart,*210.
#### George Proestler, Respondent, *v.*Lewis H. Kuhn, Appellant.

An appellant will not be heard to allege as error that which was inserted in a judgment at his own instance.

(Argued February 28, 1872;

decided March 26, 1872.)

Action to restrain a nuisance and for damages. The jury found for plaintiff, and a decree was entered enjoining *655defendant from doing the acts complained of, *“*to the injury and nuisance of the plaintiff or his tenants.” The prominent ground of error assigned was that the decree was too general and indefinite; as originally drawn and settled it was not subject to this objection, but was resettled and modified to its present form at defendant’s request. *Meld,*that defendant could not raise the question on appeal.

*N. O. Modk*for the appellant.

*A. J. Perry*for the respondent.

Peckham, J.,

reads opinion for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed with costs.
a.1



    body {
      color:#000000;
      background-color:#FFFFFF;
    }
    a  { color:#0000FF; }
    a:visited { color:#800080; }
    a:hover { color:#008000; }
    a:active { color:#FF0000; }
    -->

  
  

PYROTEC, INC. 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION

125-E Wappoo Creek Drive

Suite 202A

Charleston, South Carolina 29412 

1-800-PYROTEC

www.pyrotecus.com


May 15, 2012



Amy Roy-Haeger

400 MacArthur Blvd., 9th Floor

Newport Beach, CA  92660


	RE:	ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Dear Ms. Roy - Haeger: 


	We are hereby inviting you to serve on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of PyroTec, Inc., a publicly traded entity incorporated in Delaware ("PyroTec").  Your acceptance of this invitation will be confirmed through execution of this correspondence below, and your execution of the enclosed Advisory Board Consulting and Compensation Agreement dated May 1, 2012 (the "Advisor Agreement").

	By executing this correspondence, and the Advisor Agreement, you are agreeing to comply with the duties of such an appointment under all applicable common laws, statutory laws, and rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  Furthermore, you are agreeing to perform your advisory services consistent with the enclosed Bylaws of PyroTec.

	I am looking forward to a productive and long-term relationship.  Please feel free to contact our corporate counsel, Anthony R. Paesano at apaesano@paesanoakkashian.com or (248) 792-6886 with any questions.


Very truly yours,


/s/ John Burns


John Burns

Chief Executive Officer


Agreed:


/s/ Amy Roy - Haeger		

Amy Roy - Haeger


Enclosures

cc:	Anthony R. Paesano

	Board of Directors
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
550 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA  94104
Tel. 415-835-9200
Fax  415-391-2949

LB Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 1999-C1
Annual Statement as to Compliance
For Period of December 8 through December 31, 1999

Pursuant to section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest that:

(i.)      A review of the  activities  of GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage  as Special
          Servicer  during  the  period,  and  of  its  performance  under  this
          Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

(ii)      To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such review,  GMAC  Commercial
          Mortgage  as  Special  Servicer,  has  fulfilled  all of its  material
          obligations under this agreement in all material  respects  throughout
          the period.

(iii)     GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage as Special  Servicer has received no notice
          regarding  qualifications,  or challenging the status, of any of REMIC
          I, REMIC II OR REMIC III as a REMIC or the Grantor  Trust as a grantor
          trust,  from the Internal  Revenue  Service or any other  governmental
          agency or body.



BY: Michele Heisler
Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation

Date: 3/8/00
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  CytoGenix,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 1O-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Randy Moseley,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)The  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


November 19, 2008



/s/Randy Moseley
-----------------
Randy Moseley
Prinicpal Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Petition of TUFAGA, et al., for the Cancellation of the Lease with the CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS for Certain Land in Ana

No. 11-1906

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division

July 24, 1906

Before: His Excellency C. B. T. MOORE, *Governor*and *President of the High Court;*and HON. E. W. GURR, *Chief District Judge*and *Member of High Court*

Upon motion of Tufaga, one of the Petitioners, for himself and on behalf of the other Petitioners in the above-entitled cause, moving this Court to enforce the judgment of the Court for that the Respondents herein have not satisfactorily performed the conditions of the Judgment which on their part should have been observed and performed, as set forth in the affidavit of said Tufaga filed herein.

And it appearing to the Court, upon a personal inspection of the premises, that the Respondent herein has not satisfactorily performed the conditions which on his part were to have been performed in that he, the Respondent, or his Agent or Representative have failed to erect a school on the land leased and place a qualified teacher there for the purpose of educating pupils belonging to the Town of Aua within a period of four months from the date of the Judgment (Jan. 29, 1906), within the meaning and intention of said Judgment.

Now therefore, in pursuance of said motion, it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed by this Court that the lease *149entered into on the 16th day of May, 1904, between Tufaga and others and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints for the lease of certain land in Aua, to be used for educational and religious purposes, for forty years upon the consideration of Five Dollars ($5.00) a year, be and the same is hereby cancelled, and every condition, term, clause, matter and thing in said lease shall immediately cease and determine, and the land demised in said lease shall thereupon revert to the lessors, who may enter unto and upon the said premises (subject to the time for removal hereinafter stated) and possess and reoccupy the same as in their former estate.

And it is hereby ordered that the Respondent quit the land described in said lease within one week from the date of this order, with authority to remove the structure erected thereon by them within one week from date.

Costs of proceedings assessed at $15.00 to be paid by the Respondent.
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Basic loss per share is calculated using the average number of common shares
outstanding.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                                                            June 30                          June 30
                                                                     2000            1999             2000             1999
                                                                --------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                             <C>             <C>              <C>              <C>
Income before income taxes                                        (324,192)       (208,009)        (972,700)        (437,733)

Income Taxes                                                             0               0                0                0
                                                                --------------------------------------------------------------


Net Income (Loss)                                               $ (324,192)     $ (208,009)      $ (972,700)      $ (437,733)
                                                                ==============================================================

Basic earnings per share of common stock:                            (0.01)          (0.01)           (0.03)           (0.02)
                                                                --------------------------------------------------------------

Weighted average common shares outstanding                      29,851,789      22,973,276       29,492,860       22,709,666
                                                                ==============================================================
</TABLE>

Diluted earnings per share was included as they are anti-dilutive due to the
company being in a loss position.