alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17344 and #17345; Washington Disaster Number WA-00103]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Washington dated 02/15/2022. *Incident:*
                         Winter Weather and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         01/05/2022 through 01/16/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 02/15/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         4/18/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/15/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Lewis. *Contiguous Counties:* Washington: Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Pacific, Pierce, Skamania, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Yakima. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.438Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.660Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.830Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17344 6 and for economic injury is 17345 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Washington. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-03847 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 670 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 670

   To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a clearinghouse on 
           intellectual disabilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2023

 Mr. Molinaro (for himself and Ms. Sherrill) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a clearinghouse on 
           intellectual disabilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Think Differently Database Act''.

SEC. 2. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.

    Subpart 7 of part C of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 285g et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 450 (42 
U.S.C. 285g-2) the following:

``SEC. 450A. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Director 
of NIH and the Director of the Institute, shall establish within the 
Department of Health and Human Services, a publicly-available 
clearinghouse to provide information with respect to resources and 
information for people with an intellectual disability and the 
caregivers and families of such people. Such clearinghouse shall 
include--
            ``(1) information on individual community-based services 
        and long-term support services available to individuals 
        eligible for medical assistance under a State plan under the 
        Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (or 
        a waiver of such plan);
            ``(2) information on how to obtain health care, mental 
        health care, and other relevant services; and
            ``(3) a searchable database of such resources that may be 
        searched by postal zip code.
    ``(b) Promotion.--The Secretary shall, as applicable and 
appropriate, identify and disseminate promotional activities to 
improve, among people with an intellectual disability and the 
caretakers and families of such people, the awareness of the resources 
included in the clearinghouse established under subsection (a).
    ``(c) Model.--In establishing the clearinghouse under this section, 
the Secretary may use the website thinkdifferently.net as a model.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

       Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

       Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of deltathree, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:   December 1, 2003           /s/Shimmy Zimels
         ----------------           ----------------
                                    Shimmy Zimels
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:   December 1, 2003           /s/Paul C. White
         ----------------           ----------------
                                    Paul C. White
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### IN RE: Ronnie VAUGHN, Petitioner

No. 17-1536

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. May 11, 2017

(Opinion filed: July 11, 2017)

Ronnie Vaughn, Pro Se

Kate L. Mershimer, Esq, Mark E. Morrison, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Harrisburg, PA, for Respondents

Before: AMBRO, GREENAWAY, JR. and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

In June of 2016, Ronnie Vaughn filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the District Court, claiming that his due process rights had been violated at a parole hearing when the hearing examiner “proceeded forward with the hearing without all of the information that was submitted to the Parole Commission ... to score [him] correctly.” He filed an amended petition in December of 2016, claiming that “[t]he United States Parole Commission conducted the hearing in an unconstitutional manner by not applying the 1987 Regulations and 1991 Guidelines to [his] initial hearing.” In April of 2017, the District Court denied Vaughn’s request for counsel—observing that “it is not clear that the petition has arguable merit”—but has yet to resolve his § 2241 petition.

Meanwhile, in March of 2017, Vaughn filed this mandamus petition, claiming that “[h]ad the parole board properly scored [him] he would have received parole on July 27, 2015.” He argues that the District Court’s delay in resolving his petition is “tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,” and apparently seeks an order from this Court directing the District Court to resolve it.

While we “may issue a writ of mandamus on the ground that undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction,” Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), only five months have passed since Vaughn filed his amended § 2241 petition. We also note that the District Court, just weeks ago, denied his request for counsel. Though the five-month delay is concerning, it does not warrant mandamus relief. See id. We are confident that the District Court will rule on his petition without undue delay. His mandamus petition will be denied.

*

 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
550 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel. 415-835-9200
Fax: 415-391-2949


                          Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
                                 Series 1999-WF1
                        Annual Statement as to Compliance
               For Period of February 1 through December 31, 1999


Pursuant to section 8.12 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest that:

(a)  A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial  Mortgage as Special Servicer
     during the period,  and of its performance  under this Agreement,  has been
     made under my supervision.

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage
     as Special Servicer, has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement
     in all material respects throughout the period.  However, during the period
     of  February 1 through  December  31,  1999,  GMAC  Commercial  Mortgage as
     Special Servicer did not service any Specially Serviced Mortgaged Loans.



BY: Michele Heisler           Date: 3/8/00
    Vice President, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          40,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,074
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          13,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,499
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,055
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,147
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (425)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,143)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.9




Deloitte
      & Touche LLPBrookfield
      Place181
      Bay StreetSuite
      1400Toronto
      ON  M5J 2V1CanadaTel:
      416-601-6150Fax:
      416-601-6151www.deloitte.ca





Consent of Independent Registered
Chartered Accountants








We consent to theincorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-163579 on Form F-10/A and
No. 333-113073 on Form S-8 and to the use of our reports dated March 5,
2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Properties
Corporation (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a
separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference relating to changes in
accounting principles), the reconciliation of Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles to accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and the effectiveness of Brookfield Properties Corporation’s internal
control over financial reporting incorporated by reference in this Annual Report
on Form 40-F of Brookfield Properties Corporation for the year ended December
31, 2009.








/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP








Independent Registered Chartered
Accountants


Licensed Public
Accountants


Toronto, Canada


March 12, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.02
 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF MOVE, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ LEWIS R. BELOTE, IIILewis R. Belote, IIIChief Financial OfficerMove, Inc.Date: February 29, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         462,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,944,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,654,000
<INVENTORY>                                    852,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,060,000
<PP&E>                                       1,154,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,103,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,617,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,623,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,103,000
<SALES>                                      4,232,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,232,000
<CGS>                                        2,008,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,510,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (310,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (137,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (173,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (173,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Ingrid Junita THEODOREIS, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-72614

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*702Submitted October 5, 2017 * Pasadena, California

Filed October 25, 2017

Cindy Siuhuei Chang, Law Offices of Cindy S. Chang, Walnut, CA, for Petitioner

OIL, Jaclyn Elizabeth Shea, Trial Attorney, Gladys Marta Steffens Guzman, Esquire, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R, App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Ingrid Junita Theodoreis, a native and citizen of Indonesia, challenges a final order of removal. Petitioner seeks relief premised on her Christian religion and Chinese ethnicity. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) concluded that Petitioner, though credible, failed to carry her burden of proof under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, Sanjaa v. Sessions, 863 F.3d 1161, 1164 (9th Cir. 2017), we deny the petition.

1.Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that the harm suffered by Petitioner (name-calling, rock-throwing, and arson and looting of her family’s house) did not rise to the level of past persecution as contemplated by the INA. Substantial evidence also supports the determination that Petitioner failed to establish a . connection between the tragic murder of her brother and any targeting that she experienced. Accordingly, the BIA permissibly denied the claim for asylum.

2. With respect to withholding of removal, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that, although Petitioner subjectively fears persecution in the future on account of her religion or ethnicity, her fear is not objectively well-founded. For example, her remaining family members have continued to live in Indonesia without harm or harassment for 15 years, and recent reports of country conditions confirm improvements in Indonesia for ethnic Chinese and Christians. Even assuming that Petitioner is a member of a disfavored group, see Halim v. Holder, 590 F.Sd 971, 979 (9th Cir. 2009), she has not demonstrated an individualized risk of harm.

3. Petitioner has waived any challenge to the denial of Convention Against Torture relief by failing to include any argument on this issue in her opening brief. See Mendoza v. Block, 27 F.3d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir, 1994) (stating waiver principle).

Petition DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rulfe 36-3.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-82,885-02 IN RE CHRISTOPHER LAMONT ANDERSON, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NOS. 29095, 29096, 29097, 29098 & 29099 IN THE 196 DISTRICT COURT

T H F ROM HUNT COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

R elator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the ori gi n al jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habea s corpus in the 196 District Court of Hunt C o u n t y , t h at more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

t h applications have not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Hunt County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus applications, submitt ing a copy of timely filed order s which desig nate issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

R elator has not filed any applications for writs of habea s corpus in Hunt County

. Sho u l d t h e response include order s desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was serve d with the habea s applications shall also be subm itted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: September 16, 2015 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-83531 and 333-100974)
pertaining to the Tanning Technology Corporation 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Tanning Technology Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 24, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Tanning Technology Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002.

| |  | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
| |  | -----------------

Denver, Colorado
February 12, 2003

|ATTEST: |  | [SEAL] |  | 
|------- |  | ------ |  | 



QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Dewuan C. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-3921

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: June 12, 2017

Filed: June 15, 2017

Jeffrey Q. McCarther, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Dewuan C, Williams, Pro Se

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dewuan C. Williams directly appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. His counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which she argues that Williams’s sentence is unreasonable and requests leave to withdraw.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court1 did not impose an unreasonable sentence. *See United States v. Feemster,*572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (explaining that sentences are reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm Williams’s sentence.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.