alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Wilson Creek Mining Corp., (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended November 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Engin Yesil, President and Acting Chief Accounting Officer of the
Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant





Dated: 
March 11, 2010


/s/
      Engin YesilEngin
      YesilPresident
      and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of
the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
Exhibit 35.1

                                                     [LOGO] Countrywide(R)
                                                     ---------------------
                                                          HOME LOANS

                                                     400 Countrywide Way
February 28, 2007                             Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

DEUTSCHE BANK
1761 E ST ANDREW PL
SANTA ANA, CA 92705
Katie Wannenmacher

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide GP,
Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I
further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to
the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement") that:

      (a) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
      calendar year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing
      Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

      (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
      material respects throughout such year.


/s/ Joseph Candelario      February 28, 2007
---------------------      -----------------
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

         See Deal Name listing on following page.

<PAGE>

Exhibit A

MSAC 2006-HE4
ISAC 2006-2 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-3 (Subserviced)
GSAA 2006-10 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-11
GSAA 2006-16
GSAA 2006-17
GSAA 2006-4
GSAA 2006-4 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-7 SUB
GSAA 2006-8
GSAA 2006-8 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-9
GSR 2006-OA1
HALO 2006-2
HARBORVIEW 2006-2
HARBORVIEW 2006-3
HARBORVIEW 2006-5
HARBORVIEW 2006-6
HARBORVIEW 2006-9
MSAC 2006-HE5
MSAC 2006-HE6
MSAC 2006-HE7
MSAC 2006-HE8
MSAC 2006-NC5
MSHEL 2006-1
MSHEL 2006-2
MSIX 2005-1
MSIX 2006-2
SOUNDVIEW2006-A
ISAC 2006-1 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-4 (Subserviced)
ISAC 2006-5 (Subserviced)
HASCO 2006-HE1
HASCO 2006-HE2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anthony Verdean DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10232 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 2017

Leigha Amy Simonton, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

James Matthew Wright, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anthony Verdean Daniels appeals his 224-month sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), for possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. His appeal rests on the assertion that Texas Penal Code § 30.02 is not divisible under *Mathis v. United States,*— U.S. *377-, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016). After his brief was filed, we held that § 30.02 is divisible under *Mathis. United States v. Uribe,*838 F.3d 667, 669-71 (5th Cir. 2016), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1359, 197 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
10/01/2000 CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                      1000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JUL-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                 15,287
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          18,672
<ALLOWANCES>                              996
<INVENTORY>                            13,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       52,865
<PP&E>                                 21,620
<DEPRECIATION>                         10,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         92,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  19,132
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                             54,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           92,093
<SALES>                                17,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       17,192
<CGS>                                   6,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       21,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (10,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (10,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (10,708)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.35)



</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

140540

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140540 COA: 295002 Wayne CC: 08-011405-FC HOSEA MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6776 

To require a publicly traded company to disclose to the Securities and Exchange Commission if the company has a diversity, equity, and inclusion 

program to combat antisemitism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. TORRES of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require a publicly traded company to disclose to the 

Securities and Exchange Commission if the company has 

a diversity, equity, and inclusion program to combat 

antisemitism. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antisemitism Inclusion 

5 in DEI Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6776 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLU2 SION PROGRAM TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM. 

3 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

4 (15 U.S.C. 78m) is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(t) DISCLOSURE OF DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND IN7 CLUSION PROGRAM TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM.—Each 

8 issuer required to file an annual report under subsection 

9 (a) shall disclose in that report if the issuer has a diver10 sity, equity, and inclusion program that includes any ini11 tiative and training to combat antisemitism.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
|   | (a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 8, 2013 | /s/Thomas W. Gardner                                                         |   |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Thomas W. Gardner                                                            |   |
|               | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6706 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6706

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to fund the 
   information clearinghouse through fiscal year 2031, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2023

 Mr. Morelle (for himself and Ms. Meng) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to fund the 
   information clearinghouse through fiscal year 2031, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hunger Clearinghouse Enhancement Act 
of 2023''.

SEC. 2. INFORMATION CLEARINGHOUSE.

    Section 26 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
U.S.C. 1769g(d)) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``, including information with 
                respect to the utilization of trained volunteers,'' 
                after ``provide information''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``resources that address ways to 
                prevent hunger,'' after ``food assistance,''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``and $250,000 for each 
        of fiscal years 2010 through 2024'' and inserting ``and 
        $750,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2031''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report
based on such evaluation;



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report); and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2005
|                       
|/s/    MICHAEL R. SAYRE
|Chief Financial Officer
#### George Montis et al., Appellants, *v.*Fifth Avenue Coach Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Submitted June 11, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*627
      *Benjamin H. Siff*and *Jerome*J. *Licari*for appellants.

*Joseph Cole*and *Henry J. Smith*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ. Taking no part: Lehman, Ch. J.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GEORGE CALVIN WINDLEY, a.k.a. G,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 10208

D.C. No. 2:10

- cr

- 00660

- DGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 8, 2017 **

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

George Calvin Windley appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 121

- month sentence imposed on remand following his guilty

- plea

conviction for conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking , in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1594(c). Pursuant to Anders v. Cali fornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Windley ’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 11 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 10208

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Windley the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se s upplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Windley waived his right to appeal his s entence. Our independent review of

the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no

arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson , 582

F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at

988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
#### Rewis *v.*Sweat, sheriff.

No. 13432.

September 24, 1940.

*I. J. Bussell,*for plaintiff.

*John S. Gibson, solicitor-general,*for defendant.

Jenkins, Justice.

While it has been held that where a defendant was indicted on two counts, one for simple larceny and the other for receiving stolen goods knowing that they had been stolen, a special- verdict merely finding the defendant “guilty of receiving stolen goods,” without more, is bad, with the result that the judgment will be arrested, this principle can not be given application to a ease such as this, where the defendant was'indicted on two counts, one for burglary and the other for receiving stolen goods knowing that they had been stolen, and where the verdict found the defendant “guilty on the second count.” Such a verdict had the effect of finding the defendant guilty, not only of receiving the stolen goods, but of receiving them with knowledge of the fact that they had been stolen.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EX PARTE Charles Darby KILPATRICK

(In re: Marti Buckley Kilpatrick v. Charles Darby Kilpatrick)

2160692

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of drugstore.com, inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 29,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kal Raman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Actof 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/    KAL RAMAN

 

Kal Raman 

*Chief Executive Officer*

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to drugstore.com, inc. and will be retained by drugstore.com, inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

April 28, 2003
**Exhibit 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-130362 and 333-167074) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-125340, 333-125341, 333-125342 and 333-160042), pertaining to the Encore Capital Group, Inc. 1999 Equity ParticipationPlan, the Midland Credit Management, Inc. Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan and the Encore Capital Group 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as well as our reports dated February 14, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of EncoreCapital Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of Encore Capital Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP 

San Diego, California 

February 14, 2011
#### Charles H. Waterman, Resp’t, *v.*August J. Christian, App’lt.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs, with leave to move at the special term.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert BAHENA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-50818 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Franklin Gordon Bynum, Bynum Law Office, P.L.L.C., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Bahena, Jr., appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea *363conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He contends that the district court plainly erred by sentencing him as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 based on his Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation under Texas Penal Code § 30.02. Bahena argues that this conviction does not qualify as a crime of violence under § 4B1.1 in light of *Mathis v. United States,*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016).

The Government has filed an opposed motion for summary affirmance asserting that Bahena’s arguments are foreclosed by our recent decision in *United States v. Uribe,*838 F.3d 667 (5th Cir. 2016), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 1359, 197 L.Ed.2d 542 (2017). In the alternative, the Government requests an extension of time in which to file a brief on the merits.

The Government is correct that *Uribe*forecloses Bahena’s *Mathis*argument. *See Uribe,*838 F.3d at 669-71. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *363published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rosario Cassarino, Respondent, against A. W. Hopeman & Sons Co. et al., Appellants, and Chaplin Dairy Products Co. et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued October 7, 1943;

decided November 18, 1943.

*698
      *Charles D. Mercer*and *John D. Sullivan*for appellants.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Boy Wiedersum*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.