alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCED TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         129,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,004,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,614,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    556,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,035,000
<PP&E>                                       1,438,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (294,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,306,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,822,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,937,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,306,000
<SALES>                                      4,432,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,432,000
<CGS>                                        1,836,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,259,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPORTED IS ACTUALLY EPS-BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued December 3, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00284 - CV

——————————— LATRICE HARRIS , Appellant

V. HIGHLAND KNOLLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIO N , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 908487

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Latrice Harris , attempts to appeal from the trial court’s final agreed judgment signed on April 8, 2008 . Appellee, Highland Knolls Community2

Association , has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is si gned. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to ninety days after the date the judgment is signed if, within thirty days after the judgment is signed, any party files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgm ent, or motion to reinstate. Id .; see T EX . R. C IV . P . 329b(a), (g). The time to file a notice of appeal also may be extended if, within fifteen days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.5(b), 26.3. And a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen

- day extension period provided by rule 26.3. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.1, 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Here, the trial court signed an agreed final judgment on April 8 , 20 08 . The clerk’s record filed in this Court does not reflect that appellant filed a post

- judgment motion or a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, which would have extended the time to file a notice of appeal. Accordingly, Harris’s notice of appeal was due by May 8 , 20 08 , or by May 23 , 20 08 , with a3

fifteen

- day extension. See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 26.1(a), 26.3; Verburgt , 959 S.W.2d at 617. Harris untimely filed her notice of appeal on March 25 , 2015. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 25.1. Accordingly, we grant Highland Kno lls’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Schanny Marie RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10677 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Schanny Marie Ramos, Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Schanny Marie Ramos has moved for leave *250to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that , this opinion should not be *250published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6676 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6676

To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the matters covered by 
        the Armed Forces Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2023

Mr. Levin (for himself and Ms. Escobar) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to expand the matters covered by 
        the Armed Forces Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Military Sexual Assault 
Data Collection Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MATTERS COVERED BY ARMED FORCES WORKPLACE AND 
              GENDER RELATIONS SURVEYS.

    Subsection (c) of section 481 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as 
        paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) Indicators of the assault (including unwanted sexual 
        contact) that give reason to believe that the victim was 
        targeted, or discriminated against, or both, for a status in a 
        group.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kevin BOGUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-35078

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 2017 * Seattle, Washington

Filed April 17, 2017

Jason Anderson, Anderson Law of King County, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant .

Damian P. Richard, Sessions Fishman Nathan & Israel, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: W, FLETCHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and BLOCK,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed, R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

**

 The Honorable Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Kevin Bogue. appeals from a district court order awarding him $1,001 in attorney’s fees. Because the district judge did not begin his fees analysis by first calculating the lodestar, Bogue asks that we vacate the award and remand for a recalculation of fees. *See Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc.,*523 F.3d 973, 982 (9th Cir. 2008). Under the circumstances, a remand for recalculation is so likely to result in the same award that we decline to do as Bogue requests.

AFFIRMED

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             230
<SECURITIES>                                     1,001
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                      3,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,289
<PP&E>                                           1,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,510
<SALES>                                          6,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,678
<CGS>                                            3,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,344)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the

United States
Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (Aviat Networks) for the fiscal year
ended July 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John J. Madigan, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
§1350, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                     |  |                                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 12, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Madigan
|                         |  |  |  | Name:               |  | John J. Madigan                                                                                       
|                         |  |  |  | Title:              |  | Vice President, Corporate Controller, Principal Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Motor Vehicle and Engine Compliance Program Fee Filing Form

Locomotives All Locomotives 

NR SI Nonroad Engine Spark-Ignition

NR CI Nonroad Engine Compression-Ignition (excludes Locomotives, Marine and Recreational)

Recreational Recreational Vehicles (except marine engines)

All Marine

On Highway Nonroad

Manufacturer Name:

Certification Request Type:

Manufacturer Contact Information:

Contact Name: Email Address:

Phone Number:

Fax Number:

Nonroad Certification Types:

VIN(s) of the model(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas. Enter "TBD" if unknown):

Fee Payment Information:

Do you qualify for reduced fee?

Has a certificate been issued?

Family Name:

What is the total number of the vehicles, engines or units covered?

What is the aggregate total retail value of the vehicles, engines or units covered?

Amount Owed (U.S. Funds Only):

Payment Type:

Enter the check number:

Are you an Independent Commercial Importer?

Model name(s) of vehicle or engine under this engine family/test group (list all that apply, separated by commas):

Make of the model(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas):

Year of the vehicle(s) or engine(s) (list all that apply, separated by commas):

$

(optional)

$

Before paying offline please click the PDF Preview button below to print out the form.

Payment Details:

Calendar Year:

For dual U.S. / IMO Marine only, also give IMO name:

Date: 01/17/2013

Submit Data

HDE CALIF-ONLY Heavy-duty Engine California-Only Certification

HDV EVAP Heavy-duty Evaporative System

MOTORCYCLE On-highway Motorcycles

Component Certification for Evaporative Emmissions

On-Highway Certification Types:

HDE 

LDV

LDT

MDPV

HDV

Light-duty Vehicles (Chassis Certification - California-Only)

Light-duty Trucks (Chassis Certification - California-Only)

Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles (Chassis Certification - California-Only)

Heavy-duty Vehicles(Chassis Certification - California-Only)

LDV Light-duty Vehicles (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate)

LDT

MDPV

HDV

Light-duty Trucks (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate)

Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles (Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate)

Heavy-duty Vehicles(Chassis Certification - Federal Certificate)

Medium-duty Passenger Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers

LD ICI

MDPV ICI

HDV ICI

Light-duty Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers

Heavy-duty Vehicles for Independent Commercial Importers

Heavy-duty Engine (Engine Dynamometer Certification - Federal Certificate)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Concierge Technologies, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: November 11, 2004
By:
/s/ Allen E. KahnAllen E. KahnChief Financial Officer


|Exhibit 31.1
|------------
|            
|            

|
|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,030
<SECURITIES>                                     5,941
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   956
<PP&E>                                           4,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,874
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,725
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       111,446
<OTHER-SE>                                   (103,394)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,244
<SALES>                                          6,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,262
<CGS>                                            2,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (524)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,714)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6620 

To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to institutions of higher 

education with endowment funds equaling or exceeding $5,000,000,000, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to institutions 

of higher education with endowment funds equaling or 

exceeding $5,000,000,000, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Funding 

5 for Ivy League Schools Act’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6620 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROVIDED TO 

2 CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDU3 CATION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, notwithstanding any other 

6 provision of law, no Federal funds may be provided to an 

7 institution of higher education that has an endowment 

8 fund equaling or exceeding $5,000,000,000 on the date 

9 of enactment of this Act. 

10 (b) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), an 

11 institution described in subsection (a) may receive Federal 

12 funds for projects or research that relate to a critical na13 tional function. 

14 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 (1) ENDOWMENT FUND.— 

16 (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘endowment 

17 fund’’ has the meaning given such term in sec18 tion 331 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

19 (20 U.S.C. 1065). 

20 (B) AGGREGATION OF FUNDS.—All endow21 ment funds at an institution of higher edu22 cation shall be treated as one endowment fund 

23 for the purposes of this section. 

24 (2) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The 

25 term ‘‘institution of higher education’’ has the 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6620 IH

1 meaning given such term in section 101 of the High2 er Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001). 

3 (3) NATIONAL CRITICAL FUNCTION.—The term 

4 ‘‘national critical function’’ means a function of Gov5 ernment so vital to the United States that its dis6 ruption would endanger national security or oper7 ational control (as such term is defined in the Se8 cure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note)) of the 

9 southern border, or any combination thereof. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS