alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6736 

To provide a retroactive effective date for the promotions of senior officers 

of the Armed Forces whose military promotions were delayed as a result 

of the suspension of Senate confirmation of such promotions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. BACON (for himself and Mr. GALLEGO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide a retroactive effective date for the promotions 

of senior officers of the Armed Forces whose military 

promotions were delayed as a result of the suspension 

of Senate confirmation of such promotions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Personnel 

5 Confirmation Restoration Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 Congress holds the men and women who defend the 

8 United States in the highest esteem. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6736 IH

1 SEC. 3. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE OF PROMOTIONS 

2 OF SENIOR OFFICERS OF ARMED FORCES 

3 THAT WERE DELAYED AS A RESULT OF SUS4 PENSION OF SENATE CONFIRMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual con6 firmed, during the period beginning on December 5, 2023, 

7 and ending on December 31, 2023, to a grade or rank 

8 in the Armed Forces associated with pay grade O–7 or 

9 higher and whose confirmation was delayed as a result of 

10 the suspension of the provision of advice and consent by 

11 the Senate to appointments to such grades and ranks that 

12 began in February 2023— 

13 (1) the Secretary of Defense shall provide the 

14 individual, retroactive to the date described in sub15 section (b)— 

16 (A) pay and allowances at the rates or in 

17 the amounts payable for the pay grade associ18 ated with the appointment of the individual; 

19 and 

20 (B) the benefits to which an individual in 

21 the grade or rank associated with the appoint22 ment is entitled; and 

23 (2) the date described in subsection (b) shall be 

24 the date used for determining the seniority of the in25 dividual in the grade or rank associated with the ap26 pointment. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6736 IH

1 (b) DATE DESCRIBED.—The date described in this 

2 subsection is, with respect to an individual described in 

3 subsection (a), the date that is the later of— 

4 (1) the date that is 30 days after the date on 

5 which the nomination of the individual was placed 

6 on the Executive Calendar of the Senate; or 

7 (2) the date on which the individual would have 

8 been appointed but for the suspension of the provi9 sion of advice and consent described in subsection 

10 (a), as determined by the Secretary concerned (as 

11 defined in section 101 of title 10, United States 

12 Code). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Court of Appeals.

Filed June 2, 1891.

#### Christian Eberspacher, App’lt, v. Leopold Bohm, Resp’t.

*Edward W. S. Johnston,*for resp’t.

Order affirmed, with costs, on default of appearance. All concur.

Affirming 33 N. Y. State Rep., 792.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6577 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require the 

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to appoint amicus curiae assist 

such court in the consideration of each application for an order or 

review under title I of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 4, 2023 

Mr. LIEU (for himself and Mr. BUCK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to require the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court 

to appoint amicus curiae assist such court in the consideration of each application for an order or review under 

title I of that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 from Unauthorized Surveillance Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6577 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SUR2 VEILLANCE COURT TO APPOINT AMICUS CU3 RIAE. 

4 Section 103(i) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveil5 lance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)) is amended— 

6 (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as fol7 lows: 

8 ‘‘(2) REQUIREMENT.—A court established 

9 under subsection (a) or (b), consistent with the re10 quirement of subsection (c) and any other statutory 

11 requirement that the court act expeditiously or with12 in a stated time, shall appoint an individual who has 

13 been designated under paragraph (1) to serve as 

14 amicus curiae to assist such court in the consider15 ation of each application for an order or review 

16 under this title.’’; 

17 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘If a court es18 tablished under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an 

19 amicus curiae under paragraph (2)(A)’’ and insert20 ing ‘‘An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph 

21 (2)(A)’’; 

22 (3) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking ‘‘If a court 

23 established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an 

24 amicus curiae under paragraph (2), the amicus cu25 riae’’ and inserting ‘‘An amicus curiae appointed 

26 under paragraph (2)(A)’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6577 IH

1 (4) by repealing paragraph (7). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 35.1
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA9 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
October 30, 2006,  and the Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of October 30, 2006 (as amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC, as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee,
does hereby  certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects  throughout such period.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has
     duly executed this Certificate this 26th day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            6006 - RAST 2006-A13 (CITI)



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
#### In the Matter of Sol Cohen, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Brooklyn Auto School, Appellant, against John Splain, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted June 17, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*561
      *Julius Soloway*for appellant.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (John G. Crary, Jr., Orrin G. Judd*and *John P. Powers*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aviat Networks, Inc. (Aviat Networks) for the
fiscal year ended July 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael A. Pangia, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aviat Networks as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                       |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 12, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael A. Pangia
|                         |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Michael A. Pangia                    
|                         |  |  |  | Title:                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard COREY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16429

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 19, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed April 26, 2017

Daniel Eric Cohen, Paul D. Cullen, Jr., The Cullen Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, Brian C. Leighton, Attorney, Law Offices of Brian C. Leighton, Clovis, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Courtney Suzanne Covington, Attorney, Linda Lea Gandara, Deputy Attorney General, Nicholas Stern, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, John Seiichi Sasaki, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees

Before: REINHARDT and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Mon*480tana, sitting by designation.

*480MEMORANDUM **

Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction its challenge to Appel-lees’ enforcement of the Truck and Bus Regulation, an EPA-approved rule concerning heavy vehicle emissions. Because, “as a practical matter,” the Association’s suit challenges the EPA Administrator’s final action in approving the Regulation as part of California’s State Implementation Plan, we affirm. *Cal. Dump Truck Owner’s Ass’n v. Nichols,*784 F.3d 500, 507 (9th Cir. 2015), *cert. denied*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 403, 193 L.Ed.2d 315 (2015). *See also*42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1). We need not reach the issue of whether the EPA was a necessary and indispensable party to the action,

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In the Matter of Frank O. Bauer, Treasurer of Rochester State Hospital, Appellant. Thomas Byrne, Sr., Respondent.

Argued October 11, 1943;

decided November 24, 1943.

*712
      *Nathaniel L. Goldstein,*Attorney-General *(Henry S. Manley, Orrin G. Judd*and *Ruth K. Toch*of counsel), for appellant.

*C. N. Whitman*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-128488 and No. 333-158232 on Form S-8 of our report dated July 24, 2009,
relating to the consolidated financial statement and financial statement
schedule of WPCS International Incorporated and Subsidiaries, which report
expressed an unqualified opinion and appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of WPCS International incorporated and Subsidiaries for the year ended April 30,
2009.




By:
              /s/ J.H.
      Cohn LLPJ.H. Cohn
      LLPRoseland,
      New Jersey
                July
      24, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-29-1996
<CASH>                                                                  8185
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         211740
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            6143
<INVENTORY>                                                           126548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      346643
<PP&E>                                                                179925
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         33334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        779936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 253169
<BONDS>                                                               221825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                 250
<OTHER-SE>                                                            200855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          779936
<SALES>                                                               686352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      686352
<CGS>                                                                 500809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         500809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     19581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         6625
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            3307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     3318
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            3318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Rowland W. Thomas, Resp’t, v. James H. Whitelegge, App’lt.

See per curiam opinion.

Appeal from order of this court.

Order affirmed, with costs.
#### Gerald LAMB, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Graham Brown, Plaintiff, v. Dr. DICOCO, Health Services Administrator, Defendant-Appellee, and J. Keys, Correctional Officer; Ms. Bennett, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Defendants.

No. 16-7244

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 20, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

Gerald Lamb, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Lamb, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Lamb v. Brown,*No. 2:15-cv-00389-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. July 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
DAN MORALES

/LrrORNEY GENERAL 

## QBffice of the ST4ttornepGeneral



## SbtateofIll;exae March 10,1995

Honorable Mike Driscoll Hanis County Attorney 1001Preston, Suite 634 Houston, Texas 77002-1891

Dear Mr.Driscoll: Opiion No. DM-333 Re: Harris County SheritYs authority to call up resetve deputy she&H to provide security personnel to separate govemmeintd or private edtie& andrelated questions (RQ-750)

You ,askwhether section 85.004 of the Local Government Code authorizes the Harris County Sheriff “to call a reserve deputy [sheriQ into service for the purpose of providing security personnel to a separate govemmental or private entity that will paythe deputies on an employee or independent contmctor basis.” Elsewhere in your request, you chsracterize the contemplated artangement as one where *a resetve deputy sheriff is assigned by the SheritT to be employed...as securhy personnel with a sepamte govemmentd orprivate entity,” ktion 85.004 gcmrdy empowers a commissioners court to authorize the &tiff to appoint reserve deputies and to call them “into service if the sheriff considers it nemsary to have additional officers to preserve the peace and enforce the law.” Section 85.004 in no way alludes to the sheriB’s provision of deputies, resem or otherwise, to other public or private entities which will themselves pay the deputies. Clearly, section 85.004 does not itself provide the authority you ask about-nor, we note, do any of the other provisions oflawcited inyourbrief. We answeryour first question inthenegative.1 You ask additionally whether the licenstue requiretnents of the Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act, V.T.C.S. art. 4413(29bb), apply to reserve deputies assigned as seauity permute1 to other entities, and also who could be held liable for injuries s&bred or inflicted bythem while aC$ttgin such capacity. In viewHonorable Mike DriscoU - Page 2 (DM-333)

of our response to your Srst question-that neither section 85.004 nor any other law you have cited authorizes the sheriB’s assignment of reserve deputies to other entities as security personnel-we do not think it appropriate to attempt to reach these questions here. Since counties and county officers have only such powers as are expressly granted bylegislation ornecessarily to beinferred therefrom, webe&evethat itmust beestablished as a threshold matter whether and if so ,under what circumstances the use of reserve deputies you ask about isauthorized3 SUMMARY !kCth 85.0&f hCd -Ult code, Which &XlUdy empowers a commissioners court to authorize the sheriff to appointment reserve deputies and to call them “into setvice if the sheriff considers it necessary to have additional officers to preserve the peace and enforce the law,” does not initselfauthorize theHarris CountyShaifftocallaresavedeputysheriffintosaviaforthe purpose of providint3 securhy personnel to a separate Sovemmental or private entity that will pay the deputies on an employee or independent contractor basis.

DAN MORALES Attorney General ofTexas JORGE VEGA Fii Assistant Attorney General SARAH J. SHIRLEY Chair, Opinion Committee Prepared byWilliamWalker Assistant Attorney General
SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries





EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 (this "report"), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the "registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



1.     The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2.     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





| | /s/ Gary S. RaymondGary S. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 13, 2013
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.