S-Type Pi tot Tube Inspection and Probe Thermocouple Calibration Check 

Pilot 10, P-·361----

Calibrated Initials Oc.......- Reviewed Initials (1 

CaHper ID: "? o{) 8 () 2/ by Date ~- .i,~ 1:3 by Date 'i o,/.} 

8--Sitle 

End View A•Htt" Sidt Vfl:w Jl!:oi!C 

~ ,..-'-,-· - --r·· o, . O. 7~ • ani~'<r~ - / J 

General Pitot "fu!~AX ~ 

· i v D 1>11 J cusa~so_ so.ns'? ' ~~~lfd \UI ! • s _..,. __1 j e ; - A Tube Alignment ~ I~A\ S ; A .,, I [ t;;_<vln) ' ' t· ' ' '·' \ 1.0 ,So, ::; 1.$0? 1--- '"' ---i ~<J l 

O,..·..sil'.: A .Side -f-!v/n) ~h !~ f'll'lne 

"• a, "' r--, o. 'f -- ':-i (II : 0 

. I : '.I 0) ~ 0 ' 7 0 ,. Tll'ln$vcn;e , 

--/;;;5_-;d- ~10' ?-¥- (y/n) Tuk A);i$ '-., b"".-----1 

-· . ..v;:r.-- . '-!_,.J '~ a,SlO'? Jt--(y/n) ,, ,. I f+E2--- -- ~~0~~ ~; Q,f_ _______ ? S ~ -·-'b~ B R""' - ·-·-·- ~:0. ~ 

~ 

A A ' ·AU A 

-·-J! ) -- ~ ss•? t (y/nl 

Misalignment _ ::.~ -· . 61 _ -·-·Ii _ :-::_,_, I II,SS'? (y/n) 

··-..... 3J 

z ,-n 8 

J(r·fi?- 8 .,. 

r--'.':;., 

----4

--.... """-

·( i ) 

-

·-' ·1 zJ 9 8 I A 

v= o, y • 6'5 

~ Z=Atan(vl = 0 , ' z s 0.125"? (y/n) 

- ~0 W ·Atan(6)=,e,o 2.o W$0.03!"? (y/n) 

Acceptability for. V'if all answers are "Y", this pilo t~ tf all answers except the first (0,) afe "Y", Any other situation, the 

Use I c~ Is available for use_, and may be this pitot tube Is available for u~. but pltot tube must be 

(Cirde Selection) a.sslgned a correction factot of 0. needs to be calibrated using a wind tunn.el. removed from service. 

Probe ID: Initials f1L..- Initials ~ 

,rsOL calibrated by Reviewed by I 

i'-2(-13 'I c.l ... ' Oate 

Reference Compare thermocouple 

Thermometer Thermocouple to reference 

thennometer 

Stack IONo. 2 Readout 10 No. 

A/Wto& T Thermocouple /:f'oo q_o1'/? obs, TC = 0. 9'7 {. 

Calibration ' 

r,?SZ ' F T,fq'9 "F T,M.RT --

T ""·or '6(2. ' R T "''· Tt <:'0/ 'R Is this between 0.985 and 

1.0 15? -1--{y/ n) 

' Per SOP 032, this calibration Is g@flerally perlormeO at 160•F. 

' T""' {'Rj = T,('F) + 460 

Oate 

calculate applicability range for thermocouple 

Mlnebs :; 0.9 X Tells. TC 

n.~ ·R 

Mint!-=- Mln,..M - 460 

2.(.8' ·F 

Max;,bJ .- 1.1 x T,tn.rc MaxF =- Maxatu: - 460 

~9o 'R Y'Jo•F 

Cf)S J ~· Pirot rube IMP«tkvt TC Co/ibrarlon 

Pv EM SONXJ9 

Rew'slon txJn: MJraR-2013 

VES015600 
S· Type Pi tot Tube Inspection and Probe Thermocouple Calibrat1on Check 

PltatiO: p" ') '2-"! 

Caliper 10: 1 ol IF \S Calibrated 

by 

General Pitot 

Tube All&nment 

Misalignment 

f:II'I\W: ~ 

:A't ~ .. 

f:.nd View 

L.·B"J 

1.- ~A' .1 o,.-..~ 

J'JIIIIJ 

., 

~-

~- -. 

~ -::_ _-_ ]!, 

z 

;' u 

Initials N/lltf Reviewed 

by 

Side View 

~ L 

I I 

'I. 

\ 

"' "' -· .... ... 

i '(- .\. · A D 

- ·---

... ... . ) 4 

.1 '• I . 

' ' 

I ,I 

Initials P-c 

Date (o -!.f~J 'j 

A•O.'I t'!" 

o,. ~13 . 

a , e a .t.( # 

a 1 • f 0 

a,SlO"l ....Y.._ (y(n) 

a,SlO"l_l_ (y(n) 

.: () 

~' : ¢ . 8 ~.ss ·? ..):__(y/n) 

p,ss•? ..Y_ (y/n) 

' 

' 

0 

-r~~ ~ ____ -~ -~-r , L~- :-.{ j ~ ' ' -~- -. 

B 

v=C>to 

e=l...k..." 

' 

Z•At;n(y): 1!>.61\ 

w • A 13n(9)• (;), 0'26 

• 

ZSO.US"? '( 

w s 0.031"1 'i 

(y/n) 

(y(n) 

Atcepta:.~lli or f- ii;U;~swers are "Y". tt11s pitot t\lblt 

Us is avaUab5e for use. and may·mr-- tf all answers ex-cept the first (Dt) are 'Y', 

this pitot tube is available! for u~. but 

needs to be calibrated using a wind tunnel. 

Any other situatlcn, the 

pltot tube must be 

{Ordt Stl ) assigned a correction factor of 84~- removc.-'d from servi<.e. 

Probe ID: 

r-rz1 lnated by 

Initials 1\f M p Reviewed by Initial$ I {K 

Stack 

Thermocouple 

calibtation ' 

Reference 

Thermometer 

IDNo.' 

~J~.Jti' r, ·F 

r..._ •• ~·R 

Thermocouple 

~eodout I 0 No. 

4 1!.1 4o'Z., 

T,39S'·F 

T '""" .i:11_ "R 

Compare thermocouple 

to reference 

tht.l'mOmtt•r 

r...,rc; ~ 

T~t...ar 

Is this between 0.985 and 

1.015? . .:f..Jy/n] 

1 Per SOP 032, this t a1ibration is ge11era ~ performed It t60•F 

J T,N, (•RJ • T, ("~) + 460 

Calculate applicability range for 111ermocouple 

Min, ~ Min• -460 

ltl_"F 

COS~ISF; Pitor Tube Inlp«fidn. TCCo/lbntM 

P.,- £.f.l SCJP·(X)9 

lllt~iliM Oar•: ...w~a 2013 

VESOI5601 
1 

2 

3 

1 

2 

3 

Calibration Data Sheet- Calipers 

Caliper 10 Number 100C(0'3> 

Initials )"Y\~ Calibrated by 

Date 2-fo-?/)\?.. 

Initials 

Reviewed by M~ 

Date •'Z./oi..J,'L 

calibration E:xpites 

(2 years after calibration) 

Ring Gauge Ca r 

ID No. Diameter Measureme-nt Frror (in) (in) 

0 I&.«,"'"''-' 6.?.4'1 - D.61 

.., ~ . I() ~c.Jqf'i' {). :z,~ l) -o.SI 

0'2«'47. 0. <7,<.JCICiC? ll ,-:>,4'1 - 6 . 'L'f> 

Ring Gauge Caliper 

ID No. Diameter Measurement Error (in) (In) 

o~oo36 i<'l. 231~'{ O.d.<l>C! - c:;5 

O?OCJ35 0-7 . .'3"1 '6 '1 (', ') 2_ '2> -o.-rl 

o7.d.:>"!>S CJ. 7.?A~<1 c. 1 ~PI -

E Mecsured - Standard 1000, rror = x 10 

Standard 

o.?S 

Error for each of the three determinations must be within ±2% 

CDS· 18 Cuflpt.rs 

Per EM SOP·OU 

Ret?Sion l)ore.: Ftbrwty 2012 

VES015602 
Portable Barometer Calibration 

Portable Barometer Identification 

Reference Baromet er Identification 

Initials 

C<llibrated by 

Date 

Initials Reviewed by 

Date 

!"'l\, 

~1"1- t.l l~ 

£1Jr 

o/17/13 

l.ab<lratory barometer reading (reference) (in Hg) 

Portable barometer reading after co.-rection (in Hg) 

Difference betv.•een reference and portable after correction (in 

Hg) 

Is the difference StO.l ln Hg (yes/ no) 

'VI-''l t 'Z'l t~ 

[£ 

Vt.~ 

ct>S· ZO Porlobk Barometer 

Per EM SOP-008 

ltevlsiort O<Jte1 J(J(IJJ(N"f 2006 

Revi<we<t -l""""'Y 2013 

l 

I.JS 

VES015603 
Bastrop Scale Co1i1pany, Inc. 

P.O. Drawcr2JOO 

B>Sirop, TX 78602 

CERTIFICATION OF CAUSRATION 

(877) 321-3443 

Fax(SI2) 321 ·1 114 

emait ln(o@bawops<a!e.com 

wwwbo.stropscale.com 

CUSTOMER# : 132950 SCAI.E #: 100008310 

MAKE : 

MOOEL : 

S'.N. : 

CUSTOMER NAME : URS CORPORATION 

SERVICE ADDRESS ~ 9400 AMBERGLEN BLV.D. 

SERVICE CITY ST ZIP : AUSTIN TX. 787·29 

SARTOAIUS 

TE4101 

21450056 

CAPACITY : 4100G. 

'GRAOUATlON SIZE : .1 G 

TOLERANCE : 

l OCAJlON I DEPT : MOBILE 

BEFORE SERVICE: AFTER SERVICE: 

Comer or &;¢lion Erro : Q @ {Q() (}; 

Test W<rigl\ts 

Applied 

Scale Reading 

as Found 

Corner or Secllon Error: Q e ( ()c} dy_ 

Scale Reading 

lOG fO. 0 y 

100G 

1000 G ruvu.o; 

2000G 

4000G 

as Left 

_i.QU. Oy 

tuUo.oc. 

"' !l-000 0<; , 

I.(OUCI. OJ 

The weights used for this t .. t are traceable to the National Institute of Standards & Technology ( NJST). 

Testing equipment is certified oach year with standards traceable to NIST. Credentials may be obtained 

by vloltlng http://www.baotropocale. com/crt~dentlals.htm l 

Technician &1;1 ~ f0;._ l.lcense II <] 5/ b / D•tc (, /2 f / J 3 

Certificate #s of weights used: -L..r.t..i3.t.J :..J. C4)kt(/uf_'ft...JLL_,~.._s.L...\!!(..~- -------

8a•trop SCale Co., Inc. 

TDA Service a Inopectlon License #245519 

BSCI FORM: ~ 

1-38 

VES015604 
Balance Calibration 

Balance 10 ,-,:. Lj I O!llf 

Initials II¥ \f:> calrbtattd by 

O.to 6-1.;·13 

btema1 Contrllct« Oate 

Initial 

(allbratlo n J:?ft~~'SO f\~ 

co. ~C.· o<.:>-'l1·l!. 

Callbtatlon Welah t 

'"' Mau(c) 

"">o <;<o so 

't ")C S5 100 

Unt~u y Check 'b "\o<S'-! zoo 

<f."'' ot;3 500 

~~()I)~ 1000 

CiaUbration of Studotnt WeCJhts 

Student Weicht Set 10 

10 01,.1.'-{ 

Initials !X.- R.tvtewed by 

Dati 1-~-11 

Per EM SOP.010, 1t1.11 b.alanc;c c.aflbratton 

iS good f&r one vu r, 

Expiration Date: 

Q(p - "2 '7-''Z. Ol '{ 

Balance Reidlna c::etf)~ble Ranae (&) 

,,, 

c;o.o 49.9-501 

too-0 99.9 . 100 1 

<aoo.o 1.99.8 • 200.2 

t;oo.o 499.5. soo.s 

qq'\.9 999·1001 

·~ ""~ "' ... "''" C.I~~\P 

C05-l¥A• e.Jw•Ccl'brahM 

Pv eM 501'·010 

Rel'islon {)(ltc: July 20/Z 

1-37 

VES015605 
' . . 

r 

nAI ra rDE __,i /l/I IJIJadoAmorica J:L:I-- . $j)oclol!y Closes u.c @Scott· RATA CLASS 

Dual-Analyzed C4/ibration Standard 

11426 FAIRMONT PKWY. LA PORTE. TX 77571 Fox: 281-474-8419 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Customer 

P.O. No.: IJRS UIIS CORPOM llON 

AIR UOUIOE AME!IICA SPEClALTY GASES LLC D<lcumen< t : 4142955().001 

114 26 FAIRMONT PKWY 

LA PORTE, TX 77671 9400 AMBERGLEN BlVD 

AUSTIN TX 78729 

us 

Prooeduce 0 ·1; Sep ~Wnber, 1997. 

CyllndOr Number: AAL4460 

Cylinder Pressure• • •: 2000 PSIG 

Certlflcotlon Dote: 26Apr201 1 

COMPOI'IENT 

PROPANE 

AIR 

CERTIRED CONCENTRATION 1-.1 

•' • 0o I UU: wtlotl G~ iodol PIM1\!rt ft btlow ISO pt}O. 

21.1 PPM · BALANCE 

•• Anatv*•• accuracy it bllseCI on lhtleQIUhman\S oi GPA rtotooOI ~o~• G1. Scp1emb.r 1897. 

ANALYZEfl READINGS 

CONCEI'f!"RA TION 

&8.80 PPM 

E>tP. Doto: 26Apr2014 

Batch No: LAP0039832 

TRACEABIUTY 

Direct NISI elid VSL 

tZ• Zoro Gas A· Refe.-ence G&s f lest Gas , .. correlation CoeHtCIOflf) 

pf!OPAHE 

o.ta: 28AQr2011 RM;~cnso Unit: PPM 

Z, • 0.00000 ft1•359S4.00 T1•7865.000 

R2-35947.oo z2-o.ooooo n-7874.000 

Z3 .. 0.00000 T3•7t70.000 R3-3!593:2..00 

A!!, ~t:-.1!5!: 21. 10 Pf'iN 

\ 

\ 

APPROVED ' 

Second Triad Anal'y&is 

Conc;<.tncration •A • 8x + C• 2. +-O:~t'3 + EJ.4 

r=0..8009H832 

Conitang: 

8 • 0.00269222 

D• 

....... •.. ..._ ... -

' ' 

A•O.Ol $711152 

C• 

• 

VES015606 
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases LLC 

rJAIR UOUIDE 

114:1 F'A~l PKWY. I.Af'OR'Tt. TX71S71 f't!Orlkeo:I.Z4U7J' r:• ;281 ... 74-i14\t 

RATA CLASS 

Dua/..Ant~ly:;ed C•librolitJtt Sttutdnrd 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

As-uy l,.abQr•tol'}' • PGVP Vendor 10; A32010 

AIR UOUlDE .V.'ERCA SKX:IAL T'V CASES U.C 

11011 rAIWOHT PI<WY 

LA f'OIInt. nc nsn 

Page I of I 

!ANALYTICAL INFORMATION,_,__ ,G,as::..D' !Jcr:f?! ;:.:.;: N,;O, N:!!E=---- ---- --------------' 

C)'lindw Numbu: AUtt 

Cylincler Prusure-; 2000 ,_ 

COMPONENT f'~P.AA8 

AIR 

CER11FII!!D CONCENTRATION (Mol .. ) 

)Z.'f Jlll(4 

n.At.II.NC.C 

.. , Do"'II.UM ..._ Cflirdtlt~ • ..... l,;!Oif4 

-~~-----~fllfJ'I\,._.,,......,Gl..~ttfJ 

fLEFERENCE STANDARD ___ _ _____ ___ 

ACCURACY'' 

"rr- 1\-

EIQ:l. Date: 22Ar'2011 

8*'Ch Ho: Url't'OlStll 

TRACEABA.ITV 

o~~e¢t NlSt and vaL 

TYPEISA.M NO. NTRU1Ht !XPIRATIOH OATE 020cl:o'OU CYLINDER NUMBflR 

AI.M!Ha&.IO 

CONCI!:NTRATK>N 9UOPPM COMPO ...... _ NENT 

!NSTRUMENTATION 

tNSTRUMeNU •OOEl/SERIAU ~YJHP~97ol 

I!'<NALYZER READINGS 

fltsl Ttt.d AIWIIysis 

PROPANE 

0. ~fO~U.:JISIU 

11~01111000 R1-.»7«J..OOn~IOO 

RMlJIU 00 D.=O.OOXI) f2ooU01100 

n-o ooooo n•··•-4aooo ~1111t3.oo 

A'9, ~liOn' UJIOPf't" 

Sp4tclal Note•: 

(Z•Zero Gat R-Rtftrtnot Gas T•Teat Ot• r=Cofrt lat.iOn Coef!'icitnt} 

Second T rf ld ArQiys,ls Cell)rttion Cwn 

c:r...o.r.~--~·.£M 

,.._~-~- eorw.w. A*4..a:1"5199t7 ~402001118 Qo 

~ ~· 

Tlio ~10t'1411 • tw,a:s beW1 ~~~ •!lhollt ~fliiiJ)'F« £PA to01'1\2H.:,I$AZ. COU'I -'NO TA,OS URS JTEtM UR6005 

Q UALITY ASSURANCE 

AP~OVEO BY. SARAH HEAOERT 

{!IIQIIGII.IO Of\ R.t) 

http://172.24.128.11/3lasglrxcarp 17?Doc"()483367&Cyi• AL899 &Usr-SHOP 

1-39 

1116/2013 

VES015607 
r:JAIR LIQUIDEI Alr Liq"'ldo Amerlet llyGnt,sUC ':1 Scott RATA CLASS 

Duai-Arullyr.ed C4Jibralion StandiJrd 

11 ~28 FAIRMONT PKWY. LA PORTE. TX 7757 1 Phono: 8()0.248·'1427 • Fox: 281-474-8419 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Auax ltboratorv • PGVP Vendor 10: A32011 Customet 

P.O. No.: URS URS CORPORA '!10N 

AIR UOUIOE AMERtCA S!'i;CIALTY GASES LLC Document I: 437 11 369·001 

11426 FAIRMONT PKWY 

LA PORTE, TX 77571 9400 AMBER OLEN SI.VO 

AUSTIN TX 78729 

us 

Procedl.W"e 0·1: Septe~r. 1997. 

Cylinder N..,.bor: CC111634 

Cylinder Prtnure• • • : 2000 PSIG 

310ct2011 Exp. Date: 300ct20 14 

Batch No: LAP0051851 

CERTIFI£0 CONCENTRATION !Moloo) 

21.3 PPM 

ACCURACY" 

... ). 1 'II> 

TRACEABRJTY 

bored NIST ond VSl 

BALANCE 

•• • Do I'IOt uu \lofMin cvlincl., ~·Mot~• I• bttow 150 ps!g, 

•• Ar\llyoc1ctll tec'Jiat:Yk bs!:.O ond'le r..-emenu o1 EPA PmtOOOI ~G1. Stp~ 11:97. 

~)'UN)ER NUMBER 

A.LM0131540 

CONCENTRATION 

tl.80 PFM 

DATE !.MLCALIBRATm 

OIOe.t2011 

COMPONENT 

PROP AN!; 

ANALYDCAL ""INCtPLE 

G4$ OiltOMATOGRAPHY 

ANALYZER READINGS ..!:>='-""=:!!..===='-rr. ero GaSlt-;'Jllletence Gas r • rost Ges r=Ccrrellitlon CoeR1..;tenU 

Flut Tdad An•lytla 

PROPANE 

Ott•! 310ct20U itupont• Unl1: PPM 

21•0.00000 fill = .C.OSe-0.00 T1•88&1.000 

R2•41012.00 22=0.00000 1 2 •1829.000 

u =-o.ooooo n .. es12.000 ft3•·Uon.oo 

Aw. Conc•"!'!tlon: 21.28 PPM 

S~Notts : 

Second Tffbd An•fpb: 

eone.rmatlott •A • 8K + CJc2 + Dx3 + b4 

r •O.ft"PHa:Ji04 

Cotastann: A • 0..00'78« 213 

B=0.0023tat5 C= 

0= .2_· ---

VES015608 
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases LLC Page I of I 

AIR LIQUIDE ":s.· scott 

.. 

ll.f@fAIANONf .. M.W"t, LA I'O«ff. TX n$11 "'-: 100-Z4.i<t:l7 f'$11 2el-411-4-&41* 

RATA CLASS 

Duoi-ANIIIy:.trd CilflbNition Stamhml 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Interference FreeT" Multi-Component EPA Protocol 

Gas 

A&Ny ~ • POVP Vendof D; A320t t A'StliQUU N AIIIIICAIN.CIII\1.TYGASf.S.llC 

1H~i FAI~U0t.frfJ/K'IN 

lAPOR1!. TX 71&11 

ft.O.No.: STOOC 

~· ~001 

\IRS """- COfiiiiOAA TlOH 

MC»AMio!MU.H ot.VO 

AUIT'H f)( l j'l'29 

"' 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Gil Type: C02,02,BALN!_ ___ ________ _ ___ _ ...J 

Cyih:Mt NymtMr: CC11M6S 

Cyt..., P,..aurr-: tNO PS!I;i 

COMPONI!.Nt C:AAIIOIJ I> l (IX I 1:e OXYG:Ctl 

Nl'!J.OGCN 

CERnFlEO CONCENTRATION (Mole&) 

b.2 • 

22.~ ' [OO.A9;£! 

l}lEfER£NCE STANDARD 

[ NSTRUMENTATION 

ALYZER READINGS 

OAT! LAST CAUBRATED 

"""""' 

.. """"' 

ACCURACY'' 

..,. 1'\o 

-+1 .. H 

bp.Dete:l~l 

l•td'l No! LA~' 

TRACEABlt.ITY 

oir.ct " 1ST ano v~ 

Di-r•c::t lJIST &.'l<l vs:. 

CONCENTRATION 

17,81,. COMPOHE'HT A~6014 OIOXID£ 

20 ~ O)CYGEH 

AHA.L. YllCAL PRINCIPLE 

.,... 

._, 

{VZoroGu R•Ftelerenoe Ges Te~ Gat ,.Cctrelalon Coefficient) 

S.COnd Triad Anafyt;lf CaHbrado" CuiVt 

Special Nateli: llwo to~ h!JOI\<UI.j Ml-.!'!••wded -.tt\OUIIW$tiy Ptf [I'AWl"R2l-2':3lS42_ 

URSOaQ 00A5110 :Dt.WPT, 60 OEG.f 

!CiUAUTY ASSURANCE 

~niiA•III•C!Ct~+~ 

r..,.9'M?E>1 ccr.swu: NO.OOOOOE-o 9:S.C-1f.1 C>U1MOE-2 

o:o.occtOC oO f: 1 OfiiMQE .. 

~.A·O.-cll2•o-:>04 

....._ 

~.u.t.OOf~ 

~-7t.:I!IOOC. 

o: £2; 

htlp:l/172.24.128.11/alasglrxcarp 17?Doc=040 1904&Cyi=CC 189665 &Usr=SHOP 

1-4 I 

111 6/2013 

VES015609 
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases LLC 

AIR U Q U IDE ,S scott 

~ CICIIIIOAO, SAHTA N $P'R:NG$, CA.tOIT0-211' PI!~ .. ~2 F-.; "l~ 

RATA CLASS 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Asuy LAboratory · POVP VendOfiD: A52010 

~ l.IOI.G. At.Pit:A. li CCIAt. TV GASEi: U.C ..,...,_, P.O. Nl) COI't!SOOC.SISt:tn)ol• 

AcljectNo ~1 

~A'W.~CA~l& 

I!:~!£!!:!!::!YT!.!!: ..!! IN!:!!C!O~R~ !.!!:!!!- Gas Type : NONE 

COMPOHENT 

PROPANt 

AlA 

Cartifiottlon O.te: ~10 

CERnFI£0 CONCENTRATlON (Moles) 

L~II PP~ 

""""'en 

'REFERENCE STANDARD 

ACCUAACY•• 

' 1- 1" 

Cuatomer UA$ OORPORAnOH 

!xp. o.a.~ 11k r2011 

8M.cJ'I No: seooo•mJ 

TRAC!ABIUTY tr•c~ ~rsT a~d VSL 

Page I of L 

J 

TYPI!I&RM NO. NTRI.I tll811 I!XPIRATtON DATE 020cl20t2 CYl.INDER NUMB!R 

,o\Al.l6136 

COHC£HTAATION U I'O""M COMPOIENT 

PROP ANt! 

iNSTRUMENTATION 

INSTRUM!NT .. OOEIJSE.RIALI f.l)fG1$MIMJWO~ETH 

iMAlVZER READINGS 

1i,..t Tr*l Analysia 

PROPANE 

o.wt: t8o\iM-2010 ~ UWt: MEA 1-o.o»clff h~lt.5510Tt-1'73519!l 

lt2oo2li.OOU=G.OOCIOO f2-.11U~ 

v:o ... n-,~~.6.2!11 

.C~7.51»,.... 

:0UALITY ASSURANCE 

APPROVED 8 ¥! SAAAH HERBERT 

{8ighlture on Be) 

AHA.l Y'11CAl. PRJNCIPU! AO &TCO 

(Z=Zero Gu R•Recerenot Gat T•Test Gas ,.Con"er.uon Cotllc:ietl} 

S.cond Ttlad Anlll)'tit C•libra6on CW'W'e 

ConoenhllonorA•Ib.•CK:l•O•.:It.£»1 

190tmlltl 1666 Carabl!!ls:~Uioll 

... ~Coo 

o- •• 

http:/!l72.24.128.1 J/alasglrxcrup 171Doc=0270228&Cyi=CC250309 &Usr=SHOP 

1..02 

1/16120 13 

VES015610 
~AIR LIQUIDEJ f'"':="ti'c ~Scott' RATA CLASS 

Dual-Analyzed Calibradon StaJzdard 

1200 COM8EIIMERE STREET, TROY, M! 48083 Pho.,.: 2•8 589 29~ Fo>c 248-5S9·2134 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

As.ny Laboratory· PGVP Vendot 10: A22012 

AIR UOUIOE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES UC 

! 200 COM!ll!RMER£ STREET 

TROY. Ml 48083 

P.O. No.: 59!61·7~5000 

Oocumtflt I: 45935248-042 

Certification Date ~ 

Cuatome• CLEAN AIR IHS'JRUMENT RENTAL 

JACK BIONOA 

110 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 

RIO PARK. ANLAV TOWNSHIP 

CORAOPOUS PA 15108 

us 

16Mav2012 E>q>. Date: 1 GMoy2015 

Batch No: TROOOS7923 

COMPONENT oXvGEN CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION !Molas) ACCURACY" 

+I· 1'111 

TRACEABIUTY 

Olrect NIST aiid VSL 

Direct NIST and VSL 

iO. l % 

CARSON DIOXIDE 10.0 % +I· 1% 

NITROGEN BALANCE 

•• • Do not UN wMn cvfndet Pfa&w• it b.row ISO paig. 

•• At'latytlc:ll •ocur"y Is cased on d\ot ,.quircmtt~ts or EPA Ptotocot Pl'oeedure Gl, Strpctmlltt 1997. 

K0260S2. 

AFI/2000/COtO\& 

ANALYZER READINGS 

CONCENTAA TION 

23.20 ,.. 

23.00 " 

DATE LAST CAUBRATED 

0'7May2012 

07Miv2012 ""'" 

(2 •Zero Gas R Re1orcnce Gas I • I eat GGs r COfTeiation CoefhcumU 

firs1 Triad Analysis Seoond Tdad Analysis 

OXYGEN 

OatG: 14Mfy2012. RUj)OIU! Unll:,.. 

Z1•0..00000 R1 • 23.20000 T1•10.09000 

R2.:23.20000 U•O.OOOOO T2~ .08000 

l3a.Q,OOOOO T3•10.08000 R3~~t23 .20000 

Aw. Cone:•nuatlon: 10.08 " 

Z1•0.00000 A1•t9.10000 T1•80.30000 

f\2 • 19. 10000 Z2=0.00000 T2•00.30000 

u..-o.ooooo T3=60.JOOOO R3•i9.toooo 

Avg. Con(l!Oitltlon; tO.O\ '' 

Page 1 of 1 

Ct.libretion Curve 

Coru;.,..tradrM • A + !lx +Cc2 + Ox3 • ().4 

r• 0 .0$9007 

Constallls: A• .0.0423:l989 

8= 1.0018082&6 C=O 

0 =0 f cO 

ConoenuacJo.ft•A+Bx+Cx2 +0x3+£a• 

,.o..tt9917 

constiW\u; A-..0.0061•4 1!1 

8.,0.136.4149&2 C•-0.0002.271 

0 • 1.2374 !£.06 E.:oO 

43 

VESOIS6ll 
@scott· Dual-Amuyud Calibralion Standard 

1290 COM9ERMt:RE STREET. TROY. Ml 48083 Phooo: 24fH89· 2950 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Proto~c~o!!.I.!:G!:!:a!.!!ac__ _ __ _ 

c u.lom.r P.O. No" !8310 11·6~000 mxN"A1A ENGINEERING 

AIR UOVIOE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES Ll.C Ptotect No.; ().5..90126-010 

1290 COM8EitMEliE STRE<T DON .. llEH 

TROY. Ml 48083 600 W. WOOO STF!E:ET 

PALATINE ll 80067 

Fa.x: 248·689 2134 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION '1h..s ce•l•lic::auon wu pc::=;1,,.;;;;:,....,:r .. :;.,c""'"'"'"''":-;"' ::"1£"'P"'A-fr.,-. .... &'"":::v,Pi"ot::::DCOI::;;r"lf""ot Auav & C.roie.non of da...ow Clhtifat on St;11'16Md.s 

Proc:..dVt"e G·l; S.ptemtlet, 1997 . Cylloclot Numbet: ALM02~4~6 Cenlfle.nl.., Dote: 09Aug20 10 f>o. Oo1o: 06Aug2013 

Cylkl!Mt Pfessuro• • •: t 900 PS4G 

COMPONENT 

PIRlJ>Am--

AIR 

CSITIFIED CONCENTRATION !Molnl ACCURACY" TRACEABiliTY 

a;: ,i Pt'M +I· hb Direct NISJ and VSl 

BALANCE 

• '• Do tiiH vM when (lyfftder pr611U,. Ill bd.lw I ISO ptiO. 

•• A1\lll'l"lbl M~a .. ev It bued on tht req~Ma of t,A Pnnooot> Pf~u" Gl, ...,...,...,... t817 

REFERENCE 

~ 

STANDARD 

NO. EXHMAT10,. DATE 

NTRM 1eee 02eo ~012 

Ftitn Tried An_,. 

PROPANE 

0610: 09A.~~Q?.010 ftt>ICIO"I• tki~:AAEA 

Zl-000000 Rl .. ,822110. T1 ·6S1l1t0 

R2~2eu,~ 1.2• 000000 n -enna.o ZJ• O.OCIOOO ll 6~A.l.O "R3-113o&1&0 

A'I'Q. ~'ll'ftlh•ti vn 24. 70 I¥M 

~CEN!JlADON 

88.80 PPM 

OA TE LAST CAUBRA TED --- :UAII2010 

CoiiC1ontr.oon • A. 1tx .. c,.2+0ll"3 ·f•"' t•I.CXOO(l() 

(oftllll"'l1 

8 .. ' JJOOI{.CS 

o-o 

... .()03187273 

c.o 

1-0 

VES015612 
~AIR LIQU ID ] {§)Scott· 

1290 COMIJ.ERMEI<E STRUT, TRoY, f<ll 48083 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

A!!ay lltbSIJ!tCty • PGVP VPOcfor IDj A22012 

AlA UQUIDE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES U.C 

1280 COM89WE:Af STREET 

TROY. M l 48083 

P.O. No.: ti9748· 71-6&000 

Oooi.Jil'neflt,: .q86()9118·01G 

Certification Oate: 

COMPONENT 

PROPANE 

AIR 

CEI\TIFI!O CONCENTRATION !Molool 

14.8 PPM 

BALANCE 

• 0 ' 0o not UM whUI ........ Pf11'•~YA~. W- 1$0 ClliQ. 

RATA CLASS 

Duai·Analyzed Calibration Stantlard 

Fax: l:48-e69-2134 

$OG \\'1;ST \WOO STIEf 

PALATINE IL SOo&·? 

us 

27Jun2012 Exp.Oat., 27JU!\2015 BIICI1 No: TA00060969 

ACCURACY•• 

+1· 114 

TRACEABILITY 

Duct NIST end VSL 

' " AI'IJMle.lj JCCOfq Ill liMed ot1 the feQ!Ar.Metm of Ef'A Pro10¢01 f G1, StOt~W 1Ml7 

ANALYZER READINGS 

DAlE: LAST CAL@HATEO 

14.\11\2.012 

ANAlJTICAL PRINCI.Pt.£ 

TCO""D 

Z•Zero On R•Rtt1en:ncc Got$ I =- lMt Gu r=Conehman toelhduntJ 

PROPANE 

O•r. 27.,..Xn 2 Au~•• U•1t~ AI\I!A 

z , .. o.OOOOO R1•20.;5011. Tt• 3Stl3a.O 

ft~ 2.6408G9 . 12•0.00000 T2 • 31t350.0 

za -o.ooooo T3•31nS2.0 A3•2&23e&t. 

A!l, CcM.fo!17•tiotl: 1•,13 'fM 

Pago 1 of 1 

C'oncenu•tlon •A"' ex ... ~2 "'ou ,._ Exll 

r• O.SHf ~UMU A - 0.(M42'3J13S 

1•3.8UfU4)5 C • 0 

0•0 ti • O 

145 

VES015613 
ArR Lra RATA CLASS tHoe] ,.,...,,.,._ s.. ·scott· ta.:J-----·- SMCi.CW Gattt'-LC ~ D11al-Analyzed Calibration Standard 

1290 COM8EIIMERE STREIT. TROY. MI480S3 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Anay l.!bQ!!toty • P~ Vtn9of ID: A22011 

AtR UOUIOE AMM.ICA SPEC\ALTV GASES LLC 

1290 eot•6EflMEAE STP.ffi 

P.O. No.: 59748-7 ~6000 

ClrlfiWJ!' 

C1EAN AIR ENGINEERING 

o .......... : 443609 11 8.()15 

TROY, hii 4BOIJ3 500 WEST WOOD STREET 

PALATINE L 60017 

us 

Certification Oatt : 27Jun.2012 bp. Dato: 27J\Jf\2016 

Botch No: TR00060070 

COMPONENT 

PROPANE 

AIR 

CERTIFIED CO CENT ON !MaiO!) 8.43 

ACCURACY• • +I· \ if,; TI\ACEAPILITY 

oir•ci N1ST a iii VSL 

BAlANCE 

• • • Do t~t u.so whtm vli~ l)ft'u ut• I& b$1ow IGO p slg. 

• • Mlll'r*tl accur.oy 1t11 to;:,s.ad llfl ttl• reqt.tlftm.nta of f.:PA Pl'otoc.:o1 Pfoc~ • 0 1, Set>ltl'flbw 1t07. 

X £PNCENTRA n o N 

".'!0 PPM 

QATE lAST CAUBAAifO 

14JUft2012 

COMPONENT 

PROPANE 

MfAl YTtCAL PRIHCIPC.E 

TCCI>ID 

A NALYZER READINGS It 2eto Gas R·flit•rence Gu 1- 1est Un r•C[i(iliTIOn COiT"Iic"'""'n'"t"l----- --- -

Art\ 'rrlad Anal'(lh 

PJ!QPAI>IE .t~ 2:1JI.rl20iZ ~· UNt: A.JIIf.A 

11 .. 0.00000 1\1•2$45091. T1•Ullll 0 

IU.•11401!89. U•O.CCOOO T2 .. 221&U ,O 

Z3•0.00000 T'J• 12'1871.0 R! •2tll 38t 1. 

,h o, Conoenua\lonc ...Ai29 P9M 

DUN~ l:::~z APPROVED BY: ----,m,-..,.,,.n-- --- - JEfF CROTEAU 

Secot~d Triad A~ sls 

Pago 1 of 1 

Cont•TWMioi\•A +SJI+(lii.\•Ootl*hoi 

r•O,ilftt 

CoMtatiU: 0.0M2UU~ 

1 •3·,6U7Ko05 C•O 

p•O E• O 

VES015614 
Air Liquide America Specially Gases LLC Page I of 1 

g AlA LJQUI~ • S. Scott 

1~ fAIU,Orffpt('WV, LA~ 1)( 71$1J "-:n:ICIO-M-J47tf..:: 21H7+6ttt 

RATA CLASS 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Interference FrccTM Multi-Component EPA Protocol 

Gas 

MN)I Llboratory • PGVP Vetldor 1D: AS2011 Nt UOf.IQI; AU£IiiiiC.o\ tf'COM.1Y GASES l1.C ' l-OIS fl#f!IJIOt'ff Pt(WY 

U.POIIIT1, TX 77!71 

P O. -.:S10Ct( 

~' 

IAiW. YTICAL INFORMATION Gu TYJl! : C02.02,BALN 

Cylindef Number. C<:11tllS 

Cy1ftliH ,.~ .... ; M1tflll(; 

Certlflc.adon Dlllr. t40e<:llll1 

COMPOHENT 

CAABOtl DIOX.H £ 

OX'J'GCII 

..,.,._.. 

CERTIFitD CONCENTAAnoN (M.s) H l . :t t 

22.5 I 

£>.I..&»:t 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

INSTRUMENT AnON 

W!ALVZER READINGS 

QUAUTY ASSURANCE 

APPR0\1£0 8Y: SARAH HERBERT 

{SiQIUi!I.Q <:n fil•) 

OATE LAST CAUBRATED 02owrott 

010.CN1t 

ACCURACY'' .. , .. )'\ 

1/- 1\ 

c ......... 

URS OORPOitA 1 •ON 

t4(0A_\~k'VO 

.wsm TX lint 

us 

Exp.Da .. :t ~19 

8a.1d'l No: 1 

TRACEABILITY Direct. tllSt Ol-'ld VSL 

o uect. 11151 ~d VS!. 

COF*ONENT CARSON OtO~CIOG 

OXYGt'W 

hnp:/1172.24.128.11 /alasg/rxcrup 17?Doc=040 1904&Cyi=CC 189665 &UsFSHOP 

1-47 

l/16120 13 

VES015615 
ri W AIR LIQUioEJ ~-- (§~)s tt• Sc>ocollyGaotsU.C : .. , CO 

1290 COMSEJIMERE STREET, TROY. Ml •8083 

RATA CLASS 

Dual-Analyud Calibration Sumdard 

Phone! 248-689·2950 f ax: 24,3-589--2134 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Asuy Lilboratot r • PGVP Vendot ID: A.220 12 Cu•tOr'tler 

P.O. No.: 59661 7~5000 

Ooeumont I : 4593&248..042 

Q.EAN AIR INSTRUMENT RENTAl. 

AIR LIOUIOE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES LLC 

1 200 COMBfRMERE STREET JACK lltONOA 

TROY, Ml 413083 11 0 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE 

R<O PARI(. FINLAY TOWNSHIP 

CORAOPOLIS PA 16108 

us 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Gas T~pe : OC2 

Tf'11s certfiiC:Iilion Wil pertOrmlld xcordlng to EPAfaceebiLty ProtOOOI FOI' AJ.uv & tertHiclllon of Gaseous CeibratiOO Standardt; 

P>ceed.,.. G-1: s.-~>e<. 1997. 

Cyilndor Number: CC43365 

Cytinder Pres$ur• • • • : 2000 PSIG 

Certi-fication Date : t6May20t2 E-xp. Date: 

Batdl No: 1 6M<iy2015 TR00057923 

CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION !Molos) 

to .1 "' 

ACCURACY• • 

+I· 1 i6 

TRACEABIU TY 

Dlroct NISl end VSL 

10 . 0 11. +I· 1% Diroct NIST ond VSL 

BALANCE 

• • • Don~ uu whtl'l c\'tnder pnAW't I• klow tl50 ptlg. 

• • AM~ydtal aoetnev Ia bls!d on me ~etMnts of EP/4 Protocol Proc...,_ G1, SIIPtOft\bar lfi7. 

ANALYZER READINGS 

CYLINDER NUMBm 

IC024512 

Jt0260S2 

CONCENTRAT.ON 

23.20 " 

23-04 " 

DATE LAST CAUB.RATED 

07Mav2012 

~2012 

ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE 

P,A.RAMAGK(TJC 

"""' 

il•Zero Gas R Reference Ges I Test Gas r =COrrelation Coefhc.end 

Ft,.-t Triad Anatysh Soc:ond T rio4 Analysis 

OXYQ£N 

Ost•: 141May2012 Ruponn UnJt: % 

Z1•0.00000 Rl •23.20000 T1•10.08000 

R2 •2l.20000 Z2•0.ooooo n""to.oeooo 

Z3,.0.COOOD 13• 10.06000 RJ•2S.20000 

AYP. Concenuation: 10.06 % 

%1•0.00000 A1•0S. 1QOOO T1 •60.30000 

R.2 •tt . IOOOO Z2•0.00000 T"2•&0.30000 

Z3•0.00000 T3 •60.30000 R3•99.10000 

AW). Cone.ntratiOf\! 10.01 ~ 

Page 1 of 1 

C~n i'CitlOI\ •A +IX+ CJC2 + 0Jt3 + b 4 

r•0.99Qtt7 

ear.:twt~U: 

8 •1.0011082A 

0 • 0 

A•.0.0423$Kt 

C•O 

hO 

C::.ncti'!Cta"*" •A .. 8IC • CJa • ·O'.d + W 

r=0...8tlt87 

Con$tf!'IC•: A•·O.OOS1641$ 

a• o. '""ous2 c ... . o.ooo2;272 

0•1.23741!·05 E•O 

1-48 

VES0156 ! 6 
®scott· DIUll-A.nalyud CDlibratio11 Slmri1ard 

1290 COMBeftMERE STREET. TROY, Ml 4806-3 Phone; 248-589·2950 Fu: 248·&80 213~ 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Proto':!:c~o!!.I.!:G!.!:a~s ______ ------- -

Auay LeboratOfy 

AIR UOUIOE AMERCA SPEOALTY GASES UC 

1290 COMWMERE STREfl 

TROY, Ml ot8083 

£!!!!2.m!!. 

P.O. No,· 511320-71-66000 CU:ii.N AIR EN01NE€R1NG 

P.ojeel No. oa 901 zo-o1 o 

DON AllEH 

500 W. WOOO STIIEET 

PALATI'NE 1\. e0067 

"!~~~::~~~::::: ~iri~iWili;;QIOll'~r;o;;ut;liYJt;Oi;;Ccii'l'Q; An•v 6 Cen.1.c.aoon oi Get.out tiiliW.t on SUJnd..-ds 

ALM02!4S6 Cort1flcodon O.te: 09Aug2010 b p. Oote: 08Aug2013 

1900 PSlG 

COMPONENT 

l'l!l:fP A-,:,rAIR 

CBinRal CONCENTRATION IMoloo! 

:11.7 f'PM 

ACCURACY • • TRAClABIUTY 

+f. 1'1 OifiCt NISf and VSl 

BALANCE 

• •• Do not VM ~n o~ PtGfwr. II btiow 160 p•lg. 

•• An•vtk-.. •oct.~riC'f it beNd "' tht 'MI'-'If'llmetltJ of EPA Protocol JltocNu,. 01, S11rt111mbllt lltl 

CONC&!<~ COMPO~ HT. 

118 10 PPM PROPANf 

DATE !.ASl 

21 Jul"201 

CAU8RATlO 

0 TCD*ID 

ANAlYllCAL ~ 

ANALYZER READINGS -""-"'"'-!~!!.!!"-".!'-!!!!-"'!...-,l"z"'·"Z"•:;•o~G,;uo ~;;:e,'"o;;;nc"'o~G"as::-"'Tf'::.,f":e:oa•• 7

G"•"'·--,.-:.=-•corralauon Cuttli•c•Oil\1 

Fim Ttt.t AMtysi& 

f'R()I'ANE 

0&10: 09AuQ,DIO RHCIOn&e Urri\ Af\EA 

Z1-000000 Rh2:G22t00 Tl-8172'9.0 

R2:-16U7.54 a -oooooo u - emJS.o 

2'3•0-00000 tl•6.SM4l 0 111•18)4150 

A\1'9. ConC'CntlotiOII; 2ol 10 PPM 

APPROVED BY: 

COn.tDrlll-10!'1 • /\ • 9>1 •C•2 •0JC3 • h<\ 

I - I.OOQ(IQQ 

Col\i'LII"'If •• -oOJ'''"l 

B•J 1l009{4$ C .O 

O.aO [ •0 

VES015617 
fi]AJR UQUIDEJ A.lll:l.b M\8.ra 

Spttfa!tv O.set LLC @scott· 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Atuy laDontory • PGVP V•?S!of 10: A22012. 

AlA LIQUIOE AMERICA SP£CtAl TV GASES llC 

1200 COMB£AMI'RE Snu<ET 

TROY. Ml <48083 

P.O. No.: '!59748-71-tWOO 

OQO\I'nllt'll I : 48808118-018 

C.rtific:•tfon Oat•: 

RATA CLASS 

Dual·AnaiJ?,ed Calibralion Sttu~dard 

6<;::l~A E>IGINEEIUNG 

500 WEST WOOD ST11E£T 

PALA TJ.Jrol~ fl. 60007 

us 

27Junl012 E•P· Date: 27Jun2016 

Bltth No: TR00050989 

COMPONENT 

PAtiPANE 

AIR 

CERTIFIED CONCS'ITllATIDN !Molosl 

14 .8 PPM 

ACCU1lACV II "' 

+I· 1¥.1 T~I\CEABIUTY 

0 oct NIST a_fit VSL 

BALANCE 

• • • Do n.ut ut* wl.-n oytndtt pl6)t\l(• k billow 1§0 !)fig. 

•' An.,V'lell ~OUI'flty II N.!IY.I on lh4 (6Qu!l•mot~tl Clf EPA Pfotoc:ol Proco\fult 0,, Se~ttiiYibOf 19:97. 

CON£ENTRATIQN 

H .50 FfM 

DATE LAST CAUMATED 

\C.Asft2012 

AHAlYitcAl PR.INCt"U 

rcomo 

ANALYZER READINGS 

IZ- Z8fo Gaa R = Rufttcnc-e Gas I = 1 eil Gaa r •COfrol•iion Co~rri'"o"'lo:;;,.i1ti -------

Flrtt Trlfd Ana(riA"s 

PROPANE 

O.tt; V.IUII-7'012 Jk.q)CII\t41 Uftl': AfttA 

t 1 ... 0.00000 " ' •D4$0N. Tl • 3118M.O 

IU •1t40$69. Z2 •0.00000 T2 •Sit HO.O 

n "'o.ooooo n~a9 1S2 .0 AJ•2t2311111. 

Avq. Cot!to.ntrp!l!!ftl 11.1:1 Pl'r.t 

Speca.l Notest 

APPROVEO BY: _~~~vw~~rn:-------­ Al CHitR 

PaQt 1 of 1 

C~nCwfv• 

Conc.enptlon •10. -t Ox ... C~~o2"" Cx3 ..-£~ r•O.wtl 

~ A~O O.U.23i1 133 

8•3.U171t-o& c-o 

0•0 1•0 

VES015618 
1290COM8EAMERE. STREET. TROY, Ml 48083 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Anay l~toty • PG)(P VendOr 10: A220'12 

Alt' t.IOUJOE AMERICA SPECtALTY GJ'.SES t.LC 

1290 COMBEAMERE STREET 

TROY, Ml40083 

•: 

P.O. No.: 6974tJ..71..e&OOO 

Ooc...-nernl : •15509\16-01! 

Cenlflcatton 01te: 

RATA CLASS 

Dua/.A11alyr.ed Calibration Standard 

Cd12!l!!! CleAN .l>Jft EI'OGINEERING 

500 WEST WOO() STREeT 

PALA'!lNE ll 60067 

us 

27Jun2012 Exp.Dat•: 27Jun2015 

Ba1oh No: TR00060970 

COMPONeNT 

PROPANE 

AIR 

CERT1Fiet> CO CENTJIA~ON (Moles! 

8 .43 PfS 

ACCURACY•• 

+I· \ 'i VSL 

BALANCE 

• • • Co net w.e ~~Ind., ptu&foll'l Ia below 1 ISO,....., 

• • Aft'IV'k<lt • tC\II'IKJV 1:$ bOIJ-td 01\ thl r•qulr4mcwnt of EPA ProtOI.tOI ,..OCtdiJI• G1 , 8op1.embtt \ 997. 

ONCENTRAnON 

-.;.so P"Pt.! 

PA 1'E LAST CAUOAATED l4Jt~,2012 

ANAL YT&CAL PfiiNCJPt.E 

t etill'\D 

ANALYZER READINGS 

(Z • Zero Gn R- Ftiiferene11 Oas f • f est Ga. r• Cor:elauon CoefhetenU 

!82.~~~~-- o.,~: 27 Jon2012 Rd;IOM:e ==~~7-H~-- Unlh AR.I!A 

Z1 • 0.AlOCXlO AI =2:8410h. Tl -22:2818.0 

ft2•M4Ca6J. U•O.OOOOO T2•2219$4,0 

Z3•0.00000 'f'3 c2211'1'1.0 Al • 2B23S81. 

Avo. Co'leenu~vol'l: &A:Z~ PPM 

(___ 

OM~~ IS 4N07392 

APPROVED BY: --.,.,.,,.,_,n--- - - - JEFF dtOTEAO 

Pal.)O 1 ot 1 

ConctnlrodM•ii. ~e~~"' C.~t l· .. Vd"' f.lt.& 

1•0.9999 

ec~c~u: A•0.0441IIt33 

8•3.851181-05 C•O 

~51 

VES015619 
Air Liquide America Specialty Gases LLC Page I of I 

ltQBFNIWOHTPI<WV.lAPOft'f'ft, 1)( 71$11 Pt'<OI'W C!U~~ <.Vt'rf.; ::ut-c'l6·&4l0 

RATA CLASS 

Duui-.Analy-..ed Colibrr.rdtm Suuulai'J 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Interference FrceTM Multi-Component EPA Protocol 

Cas 

AI••~ labor110ry . PGVP Vtndot 1&. A32011 o\!M LIDUIOE ,\M[It(;A SI"ECW.T'V OA&ES U.C 11~,~fi!M"( 

LA ltQIIn£. 1X IT1ft 

PO.No.:lSlOCK ~~ f :+f<Oil!&C01 

@ ALYTICALINFORNATION Gas TYJ>t : C02,02,,BALN 

C)'lln6ef Number: CC16MIS 

C)ltlndw Pte:Huft•-: li50NICJ 

COMPONENT 

. 

CM9oto DIOXIC! .,. ... C!!RTIFlEDCOHteNTRATtoH (MOles) 11'. i • 

u.s • 

·- .,....,.,. 

REfERENCE STANDARD 

TYPEISRM NO, Nl~ 1e00 

·--

)NSTRUMENTATION 

INITfWMEHTIMOOEliSEftlAU 

.................. ~Xlt&4N701tt• 

li\NAL YZER READINGS 

'QUALITY ASSURANCE 

APPROVED BY: SARAH HER8SHT ~-gnetwc on tile) 

CYliHOER NUMOER 

ICO:tftn 

........ 

OATE LAST CALIBRATED 

"""""" ,~, 

c .......... 

URS COWOftAliON 

t400 ..... i!.MI..C:N at\10 

~lXJt'2t 

"" 

Exp. D11to: 1$tlkl0tll 

Sitch No! ~ 

ACCURACY"' 

•1- u. TRACEABILITY Pirect NI $1 ~d VSL 

•1- lt Diroct lU51 ~.nd \I$L 

COHCI'!NTRA TK>N t7.&1tf COMPONENT 

CAAIION OICOOOE 20.e:IS '""'""" 

ANALYT.C:AL PftlNctPLE 

rn• -•me 

COIIOIII'U*~--911•ClQ-tOJ:l.*EM 

MQOIIrfE·I CcnMw.U: 4:0.0(1()00C•O 14CI!III\!·1 C)o1.t13UE.Z 

o-o~~ f-o.oooooE~ 

,._

C~o9w~;)-~ ,. 

COMI.,U:A;:.o(I.OOtO] eG 

24~7 15&1111 C• .... 

http:// l72.24. 128.1 alasgloccarpi7?Doc=040 904 Cyi CC 189665 &Usr=SHOP 1116/2013 

VES015620 
r.I.AIR uau1oe: I ""UQ""'""'"""'" ~s· .·l scott· u.:1 Sj>odol\y GasQ U.C 

RATA CLASS 

Duai-A11alyzed Calibralio11 St011dard 

1 280 COMBERMERE STREET. TROY, Ml43083 PhOno: 2411-689·2950 fox: 246·589·2134 

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

Assey Lllboratorv • PGVP Vel'ldot 10: A22012 

AIR LIOUIOE AMERICA SPECIALTY GASES U.C 

1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

TROY, Ml 48oa3 

Pn>cedwo G-1; Sopteml>e<, 1987. 

Cylinder NOO>bor: CC43355 

Cylinder Prenura•• • : 2000 PSIG 

P.O. No.: 69561·70.85000 

Ooovmunt # : 4~936248·042 

C.rtification Date: 

Cutsgme r ClEAN AIR INSTRUMENT RENTAL 

JACK BIONDA 

1 10 TECHI..OLOGV DRIVE 

RIO PARK. FINLAY TOWNSHIP 

CORAOPOLIS PA 15108 

us 

16May2012 Elcp. Date: 16M<oy2015 

Botch No: TR00057923 

COMPONENT 

OXYGEN 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

NITROGEN 

CERTIAED CONCENTflA TION !Mol .. I 

10 . i " 

ACCURACY " 

+7·1% 

TRACEABILITY 

Direct NtST end VSL 

D;rcct NIST ond VSL 10.0 " BALANCE +I·'" • • • Do Mt ww wMn cyllndef presour• is bek)w 1 &0 pa.ig. 

• • A.Miytictll KCWII:Y tl bisad on en. rtQIMf~t ot EPA Protocol Procedure 01. So!plM'Ibtf 1997. 

CONCENTRATION 

23.20 " 

2.3.04 " 

DATE LAST CALIBRATED 

07MtyZ012 

07Miy2012 

CAMOH DOOXIOE 

ANAL VnCAL PRINCIPlE 

PARA.MA.GNETIC 

"""' 

ANALYZER READINGS ..:::========'-,.,~-=-ze,;:;o-ror.os..-uR-;;.-•Rilerence Gos l • Test Gns r = Corroiotton Cooificlend 

OXYGEN 

~101 1"Mey2012 Response Unit:% 

Zl•O.OOOOO R1•23..210000 r1•10.09000 

R.2•23.20000 U•O.ooooo n~to.oeooo 

Z3•0.COOOO T3•10.0&000 R3•23.20000 

Ava. Collt:l!n-ration: tO.Ofl % 

CARBON DIOXIDE 

oar.~: 17May2012 RdponM Url't.: aN 

z-t •0.00000 R1 •88. 10000 Tl =00.30000 

A2•99.10000 Z2•0.00000 T2•60.SOOOO 

!.3•0.00000 13•80.3-0000 R3•99.10000 

A\00. Conct-ntmlcn: 10.01 " 

Page 1 of 1 

Conc.encratloi\•A • Bx + CX2 +0~t3 + hA 

f•0.99t~7 

Comune.t: 

a • 1.ocn 10&266 

0 = 0 

A•o0.04233.Nt 

C•O 

<•0 

ConoMV&tiol'I•A +Bal. +Otl+ 01C3 + b4 

r•0..99't887 

Ccnn~nu: A•.0 11411!1 

8 •0.1380164952. c -..0.0002~7% 

D • 1. p741E.·OS C .. o 

1·53 

VES015621 
VES015622.pdf 
Ogule i, David 

from: Ogulei, David 

Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 2:27 PM 

To: Wooklms, Jane 

Cc: Ogulet. David 

Subject: RE: Phone Call Record 3/26/14 - Date COtrected 

Call Record 

Caller. D avid ~lei 

Date of call: 3/ 26/ 14 

Time of eall: I :49 pm 

PutpQse of CaU: To obtain updated information on the commercial av:Ulabllity of the multi-metals CEMS. 

Call with: Krag Petterson 

Phone no. (503) 670-8335 

Companr: C.oopcr Environmental Services, PonlaoJ, O~p,<>n 

I) Any dditional updates on the commercial availability of the multi et:~ s C!Th!S that you would Ukc to add 

to i\k Cooper's? 

• A Chinue company {Sale Hero) has purchased a majority stake of Cooper Environmental Services 

• Cooper Envoronmental will be shipping one stack unit In April/early May to be installed at a Chevron facility In 

Nigeria. E~pect the unrt to be&ln operating 1n mid-5ummer 

• Currently working on a spectal project for SCAQMD {2 secondary lead smelters). SCAQMD wUI be renting the 

units for a period of 10 months starting around Decemb4tr 2014. Plan to do side by stde method 29 tutina. Also 

hope to deploy the Quantitative Aerosol Generator {QAG) at this location at some point while the unJtis 

deployed there. SCAQMO contact Is: phillip fine 310·486-4295. Email: pfine@agmd.gov. 

• No stack unit is currently runnlnc at a facility. 

• Currently have a number of 1mbient units in China, Australia and othe r countnes. 

Z) What would be the approximntc: cost of installing and testing the three unitS? How much would it be for 

on< unit? Do you ha\'e a sample invoice you can share with us? 

• Each unit's purchase cost Is about $2SOk. Approx. $900k ballpark totill for 3 untts includong onstallotion and 

testlna. Would need to visit the focllity and do an appraisal of what is needed. 

• Operating costs primarily come from filter tape. For continuous operation (15 min samples), filter tape would 

cost $780 per roll per week {S4lk per year) per unit. Total operating c<»t Is approximately $50k per yeir per 

unit 

• Kraa will look Into possibly shaflni a copy of the quote they recently did for Chevron (S3SOk project) but that 

project Included a number of spare pans that m•ght not be needed for the average project. 

• Krag will share the rental quote estimate for the SCAQMD. That quote Is public information. 

l 

VES015622 
VES015623.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Paddock, Nancy <nancy.paddocl<@veolia.com> 

Tues(lay, March 04, 201 4 6:2.8 AM 

Ogulel, David 

Dennis Warchol 

Re: Title V Request regarding material processing areas and emissions calculations 

Yes, David, old habits die bard. We've been through many name changes but TWl was the original. I am io 

fac.t, referring to Veolia in my original e-mail message. 

Please let me know if you need additional infonnation regarding this request. 

Thanks and have a great day! 

Nancy 

Nancy Paddod< 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

Please note that my e-mail address has changed: 

Nancy.Paddock@Veolla.com 

This e-mail message from Veolia E5 Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended 

redpient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution Is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all 

computers. 

Oo Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at4:28 PM, Ogulei, David <O!..'ulei Da\ldiU epa.go' > wrote: 

Nancr, 

The ~mail below rdcrs tO '"1'\X.T' in multiple locations. I'm assuming rou are referring to Veolia's pcnnit ond 

csnmated emissions. I ( this request indeed pertains to Ve,.,lia, we will review the request as part nf the renewal 

permit application. 

Thank you. 

VESOI5623 
U.S. Emironmenrnl Pro«ction Agency 

Rej1ion 5 J Air & Radiation Division I A-18J 

77 Wrst Jackson Hlvd. I Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Phone: (312) 353-0987 I Fa!<: (312) 692-2080 

From: Paddodl, Nancy (mailto:oaocv,paddock@yeoloa coml 

Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:43 PM 

To: Ogulei, David 

Cc: Dennis Warchol 

Subject: Title V Request regarding material processing areas and emissions calrulatlons 

Hello David, 

Seetion 2.2(E)(3) ofTWrs 2008 Title V permit states tlJat the TANKS program must be used to calculate 

emissions from MPI, MP2 and LPR. 

Last year, a consultant reviewed our emissions inventory process. The Surface Evaporation Model rrom EPA 

GuldMCe EIIP Volo.me II:Chal)ler 8 Sec:Uon 4.1 4. Prelerred and AltemaUve Methods lor Estimating Air Emissions from Paint 

and Ink Manufacturing Facilities, March 1998. Equation 8.4-18 was used to calculate e,.ssions from MPl, MP2 and 

LPR. The consultant compiled an average of 5 years of the most reecnt TRI concentration data to determine 

tile concemration of VOC and HAP in the waste, which was then used in the EPA Surface Evapordlion Model 

referenced above. 

TANKS is based on routine displacement of liquids. The surface evaporation model is ba~ed on the volatility 

and ability of a compound to evaporate from the surface of solids and then be picked up by the air in the 

building and carried to the atmosphere. lbe evaporation method seems to be more appropriate for MP J, MP2 

and LPR; TWI would like to change seetion 2.2(E)(3) of the upcoming pennit (or the equivalent section 

thereof) to indicate the Surface Evaporation Model will be used to calculate emissions from these source-~ . 

This table compares emissions calculated by botb methods for tbe same calendar year: 

2 

VES015624 
TANKS Model 

3tea TPY lb 

MP-1 0.06 117 

MP-2 0.02 44 

LABPACKIREPACK 0.03 68 

Evaporative 

model 

TPY lb 

0.21 424 

0.1 I 212 

0.04 85 

I hope tbis makes sense. Please let me know if you have questions. 

Thank you, 

Nancy 

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

sauget, IL 62 20 1 

618.271.2804 (x-115) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

Please note that my e-mail address has changed: 

Nancy.paddock@\/eol!a.com 

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended 

redpient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged Information. Any unauthorized review, use, 

disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate 

with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all 

computers. 

3 

VES015625 
4 

VESOI5626 
VES015627 .pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent 

To: 

Gamel!, Kim 

Wednesday, October OS, 2014 10:27 AM 

Ogulei, David 

Subject: FW: 2013 ses presentations 

Attachments: QAG SES poster presentation 2013rev1.pptx; Sources of Uncertainty in HAP Metal Emission 

Esllmates 032713ggggggg.ppt 

From: John Cooper [maitto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 11:03 AM 

To: Garnett, Kim; Bivins, Dan 

Subject: 2013 ses presentations 

Give me a call and I can go through these presentations with you. 

John A Cooper, Ph. D. 

President 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave. 

Suite J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

VES015627 
VES015628.pdf 
Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

Sources of Uncertainty in HAP 

Metal Emission Estimates: 

Assumptions, Probes, CEMS and 

Surrogates 

Source Evaluat~~" So~iety----.. ....... .· r ___,. ... 

March 28 2013 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

VES0l5628 
Outline 

• HAP Metal Emissions 

"' 

• Uncertainties in Metal iss ions 

- Actual emissions 

- Measured emissions 

• Session 9: Uncertainty Details 

App~icabfe Sources: 

Incinerators Coal-fired Boilers 

Mills Mineral Processing 

Plating Portland Cement 

Cooper Environmental Services 

Smelters 

Kilns 

Welding 

2 

VES015629 
Key HAP Metals are Different 

• They typically occur at trace levels in feed, fuel, 

additives and emissions 

• Concentrations and potency ar hly variable 

• May partition between vapor and particulate 

phases to varying degrees depending on source 

chemistry 

Cooper Environmental Services 3 

VES015630 
EPA-Designated HAP Metals 

Transition 

Element Cancer Toxic PM~* NAAOS Metal** 

Antimony ..J 

Arsenic ..J ..J ..J 

Beryllium ..J ..J 

Cadmium 

Chromium " ...; " ...; y ..J 

Cobalt y ..J 

Lead ..J ..J ..J 

Manganese 

Mercury " " 

Nickel ..J " " y ..J 

Selenium ..J ..J 

Other Non-HAP Metals of Concern 

Thallium ..J ..J 

Vanadium ..J ..J ..J 

Iron ..J Y ..J 

Copper ..J ..J ..) 

Molybdenum ..J ..J 

Zinc ..J 

*Identified as a significant contributor to observed PM bealtb effects. 

**Generate reactive oxygen species, which cause damage to cell structures. 4 

VES015631 
Data Quality Objectives of 

Emissions Monitoring for Metals 

Congress 

EPA ........ Protect Public Health 

" MACT 

§ 112 of with Adequate Margin of Safety ~ "' 

AAA (1990) "\ 

' -<...,7 c. 

Residual Risk 

Metals are a significant contributor 

to PM Health Effects 

/~ 

PM Health Effects <: 

Cooper Environmental Services 5 

VES015632 
EPA Has Said: 

• Monitoring is part of the emissions reduction and 

control process 

• Uncertainty minimization is best ac'hieved with 

more measurements of emissions 

• Reducing uncertainty in compliance 

measurements produces quantifiable benefits 

Knowing sources of uncertainty and their 

general magnitude is important to 

reducing those uncertainties. 

Cooper Environmental Services 6 

VESOJ5633 
Examples of Uncertainties 

• Typically Small (<10°/o) 

• CEMS single point samplin 

• FRM sample recovery 

• Deviations from lsokinetic sampling 

• Analytical sensor/procedure 

• Potentially Large ("'lOO+o/o) 

• Feed/fuel composition variability 

• Process/aerosol variability 

• Probe loss variability 

• Surrogacy assumptions 

Cooper Environmental Services 7 

VESOJ5634 
Actual Metal Emissions Variability 

Feed 

Fuel 

and Measurement Uncertain 

Differences between 

measured (PM or Metals) and 

actual metals emissions 

Metals 

Emissions 

Measurements 

Process 1 )j Emissions Controls I >I 

Additives 

Cooper Environmental Services 

Stack 

8 

VES015635 
Example: HWI Compliance 

Demonstration 

• Initial Tests- Performanc~ "Trial Burn" 

- Determine transmission effici y (T) 

• Metal spiking (F s) 

• Method 29 measurements (C=M/U) 

- Define plant operating parameters 

• Continued compliance demonstration 

- Maintain plant operating parameters 

- Monitor Feed Rate (FCi) 

• Periodic "Stack Tests"- years between tests 

Cooper Environmental Services 9 

VES015636 
HWI Stack Emissions Model 

E TF VA .. 

\ 

Emissions Feed Rate Area 

Velocity 

Stack 

Concentration Assumptions: 

Transmission 

Efficiency 

-Transmission efficiency is constant and independent 

-Metal feed rate is accurately known 

Cooper Environmental Services 10 

VESOI5637 
Assumed/Calculated 

Concentration of ith Metal 

/ ck Velocity & Area ~ 

........... *" c~ l 

F.oT.o I z z 

VoA 

Metal Feed Rate ith Meta1 Transmission 

Efficiency (Performance. tests) 

Current Operating Conditions r ) 

Cooper Environmental Services 11 

VESOI5638 
Calculated Concentration Based on 

Feed and Performance Test Data 

Measured Method 29 

.,sumed = 1.0 

co= F°C( 

l 

vt 

- M: lsgsJRe 

F ut /C: vo 

Gas Sampling Bias 

Feed Sampling Bias 

Efficiency Representation Bias 

Cooper Environmental Services 12 

VES015639 
Uncertainty (a) in Current Calculated Gas 

Concentration for ith Element 

- -- 1to10% 

(j =Co 

Co . i 1 

O" p 

0 

Fo 

2 

+1 -. 

M~ l 

() f C; 

c! 

l 

(J U' 

+. u~ 

2 

2 

() 

+I F; 

F' 

s 

2 

2 

~ 1to10% 

Cooper Environmental Services 

a sf 

sf 

2 

<>v, 

+. ~ 

21 

h 

l 

(J Re 

Re 

, .. ---.. 

+ 

..... 

.... 

2 

(jvo 

vo 

13 

VESOI5640 
HWI Uncertainties 

e Measured Parameters ( <1 0°/o, small) 

• Bias - Sampling Stack Gas lO~mall) 

• Bias - Sampling feed, fuel, etc. (--100+0/o, large) 

• Bias -Representation of process, controls, etc. 

during trial burn testing (--100+0/o, large) 

• Deviations from Assumptions (--100+0/o, large) 

- PM surrogate for metals emissions 

Small 

t 

L'arge 

-99o/o of Uncertainty in Actual Metals 

Emissions is Due to These Large Sources 

Cooper Environmental Services 14 

VES015641 
Estimating 

Magnitudes of 

Variability ali.d 

Metals Emissions 

Uncertainties 

-E MPLESCooper Environmental Services I 5 

VES015642 
1 PM 

(173) 

w 

SPM 

(2.4) 

3PM 

(11) 

Arr 

;:;;' 1,000 

E 

..... .., 

.=. 100 .... 

c 

8 

.... ·c: 

.. 

.. 

¢ 

10 

1 

0 

• • _::._ 2,345 ng/m3 -

4%of 70 year 

one in million 

concentration 

0 2 4 6 8 w 12 " 16 18 20 22 ~ 

Time of Day 

Louis E 

Monitor 

xam e 

11 AM - - ind Dire 

(2,345)(Concentra 

s 

tion 

ng/m3 ) 

9AM 

(0.76) 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 16 

VES015643 
Time WD ws 

- 9 118 0.9 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

2,345.00 

173.00 

17 

VES015644 
Hourly Lead (11/23/09) 

45 350 

40 

35 

Two thirds of 

totallead ~ ~ 300 

"' -

E 

' 30 

~ 

- 25 u 

1: 

0 

u 20 

, 

nl 

Cll 15 

...J 

10 

Wirul 

Direction 

' ' 

~ 

Jl - .. -- - • 

/ - - -- - ... _., .... v 

• 

250 c 

0 

·... -

u 

200 Cll 

... 

c 

, 

150 1: 

~ 

100 

5 

0 

24-hour average :;: 4.6 ~Jg/m3 

LLa .J J r- .--

' . - • li - . - -.--

so 

0 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

,...; N <n <t Ill \0 " 00 en 0 ,...; N <n <t Ill \0 " 00 en 0 ..... N <n 0 ..... ,...; ,...; ..... ,...; ,...; ,...; ..... ,...; ,...; N N N N 

Time of Day 

Cooper Environmental Services 18 

VES015645 
60% 

SO% 

Percent of total Mass 

& Samples for Pb 

40

% _D Pb Mass _ '-II 16% of samples represent 

87°/d of Pb Mass % r No. Samples I 

~ I V"l 

~ - ---.· - - e t e 1-hour sample Q 30% 

-0 

1-

1 re resents >11% of -0 

~ _ 1 Pb mass 20% j10% 11T L[ 0% J 

f;)"" f;)., <:)">- 1:)'\. 1:)., .... --:. .... <:> "" " ""I:) '\.1:) ::~,l:l <:S <:S ••• " ........ o .... o o 0.., t-· 0 · .._o .._o .._o .._o '"o <, ">- c.."" 0

.., ~ <;; f;)" <:)..., 1:)'\. 1:)" .... '>- 1:). -' "> 9<:) ~ • • . " 

M ass Category (t-tg) 

Cooper Environmental Services 19 

VES015646 
~80.0 

= "' 

~ 60.0 

,§, ~ I 

"' 40.0 . = 0 

Probe Losses And BAM-Based PM 

CEMS Correlations 

QAG Correlation 1 !I ' QAG Correlation I I -- ~ 

I I 5 80.0 ~ 

~ 70.0 ~,.~ I y l.OSx- r:rsy = l.07x - 2 96 o-!'":~T~ ;. x~ II < 60.0 1 It' = 0.994 R' = 0.985 .... ! so.o ·I I I' -- ~ 40.0 

'I 

2 

~ 30.0 

~20.0 --

i' 

I <-' 20.0 

< 

6 0.0 l 

0.00 

~ 80.0 I ~ 60.0 

Cl, 

,§, 40.0 u 

= 0 

u 20.0 

0 

< 0' 0.0 

0.00 

-- ~ 

20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 

Beta # I Cone {mg/wsem) 

QAG Correlation 3 

y = 1.06x - 0.364 __ ...:.._ R' = 0;')93'-

• • 4 _ .. 

' 

20.00 40.00 6000 

Beta # 3 Cone (mg/wscm) 

80.00 

I 

o- 10.0 

0.0 

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 

Beta # 2 Cone (mg/wscm) 

SloRe 

CEMS QAG PS-11 R2 

1 1.07 1.17 >0.98 

2 1.05 1.19 >0.98 

3 1.06 1.63 >0.98 

20 

VES015647 
QAG Calibration of BAM PM CEMS 

Stack 

Aerosol 

MS Measured Cone. 

Gravimetric Measurement of 

PM Deposit 

Probe Transport Filter 

PS-11 CALIBRATION 

Probe Transport Filter Tape 

\ I 

y 

PM De pos it Not 

M ea sured 

PM Mea sured via BAM-Based 

CEMS Response 

Probe Loss Cone. 

:PIC 

CEMS Measured Cone. ? 

Cooper Environmental Services 

VES015648 
14 

I~ 

~ 10 

! 

e • ~ 

::10 

~ G 

;;; . 

~ 

0 

0 

Light Scattering PM CEMS on HWI 

Method 5 vs Sigrist CEMS 

- --- • -

• • • 

• • 

• 

__51ope = - 0.2'l__ 

- -

5 10 t S ~0 

Sl!lflsl mg!m l 

-g 

:.1 

a. 

§. 

I) 

<( 

0 

::10 

... 

• 

~ 

• 

-

-

- -

-

~5 

QAG vs Sigrist CEMS •. .,00 

1.200 

1.000 y_ = 3.031 X • 0.032 · 

0,800 

0.600 

0.400 

0.200 

- R•= 0.989 ~ __,./ 

~ 

/ 

0.000 

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0 .200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0400 0.450 

Sig<isl Response (PLA) 

Cooper Environmental Services 22 

VES015649 
Comparison of Light Scattering PM CEMS 

(PS-11 Calib.) with Series ofM5B 

Measurements (Wet.Stack) 

CEMS Slope Intercept R2 - 1 + 0.19 +2.7 0.74 

2 + 0.24 +1.8 0.80 

M5B c--~ 0.36 +6.2 0.38 

% M5B Probe Deposit = 95% 

Cooper Environmental Services 23 

VES015650 
PM May Be Dominated by Sources 

Independent of HAP Metal Sources ~ 

PM can ~ ... 

by slurry blow-by 

Feed Scrubber Slurry 

Process I ;l Controls FGD Stack 

Fuel 

Additives 

Cooper Environmental Services 24 

VES01565 1 
1 

-

~ v 

0 

E 

! 

c -

Coal-Fired Boiler - Wet Stack 

M29 PM v M29 Cr 

y . l .88 1.oc . 2.'J977 

R' : 0.9996 

• 

• 

Ht1 tM&/rt'IJI 

M29 PM v M29 As 

• ·• 

.... """~" 

• 

• 

1'\ 

E 

...... 

CD 

~ 

-Ql 

"' 

:; 

i 

Jt 

0 

Method 29 Se v As 

.... 

y = 3.598x + 7.1769 

R2 = 0.9954 

As ~Jg/m ) 

M29 PM v M29 Se 

• 

• 

I'M ( '"'",... J) 

Cooper Environmental Services 

• 

25 

VES015652 
105 

I 04 

........ 

M ] OJ 

~ ~ J02 

(.) 

g 101 

u 

-

~ wo ~ 

C5 l O·l 

~ 

c.. I 0-2 

10-3 

Hypothetical Variability of PM and HAP Metal 

E1n issions from CFPP 

A. j'-'A 

Coal Blend Coal from Additive 

Time (months) 

........_...._ _____ _ 

PM 

--- Se 

Co, 

Cr 

VES015653 
95°/o CONFIDENCE INERVALS FOR METALS 

Data Quality Objectives: Process Optimization, Compliance or Health? 

HWI PM 

HWI Metals 

CFB PM 

PM2.s 

CFB Metals 

I 

I 

10•

1 10° 101 102 103 104 105 

Confidence Interval (J,~g/m ) 

Cooper Environmental Services 27 

VES015654 
Estimated Metals Uncertainties for Compliance 

Demonstration Options 

Options 

MMCEMS 

PMCPMS 

(with M29) 

Periodic M29 

PMCEMS 

--BAM 

-L. Scat 

PMCPMS 

(with MS) 

Periodic MS 

Small Probe 

Sources Deposit* 

< 5% < 20% 

<5% <20% 

15% 

< 5% < 20% 

<5% < 20°/c, 

<5% <20% 

15% 

* Due to Probe deposit variability. 

Process Metals Total 

Variability Surrogacy Uncertainty 

< 10% -- - 30% 

> 100% - 300% > 400% 

> 300% > 300% 

< 10% - 1000% > 1000% 

- 50% - 1000% > 1000% 

>50% - 1000% > 1000% 

>300% - 1000% > 1000% 

VESOI5655 
Conclusions and Recommendations 

• Focus on obtaining a more representative sample by 

developing a probe with minimal P'Woss- <5°/o in either 

wet or dry stacks 

• Uncertainty minimization is best achieved 

'

w" ith more, 

direct measurements- Multi-Metals CEMS 

• If the first two can be achieved, concern for process 

variability is minimized 

Focus on largest sources of uncertainty 

• Process variability 

• Probe loss variability 

• Surrogacy assumption 

Cooper Environmental Services 29 

VESOI 5656 
Clear Improvements 

1925 

Acentu - Pittsburg, PA, ()SA 

1925 

1957 

me 1957 

1998 

• 

Cooper Environmental Services From AWMA flies 30 

VES015657 
C\• 
VES015659.pdf 
PROBLEM 

Tl'leff! i$ no NIST•l"rKM* c.-radon Met audl 

tundard to dial ... PM CEMS 

OBJECTIVES 

Evatuat. Md ck\1Sot;l cu• HIST·l'nl<e•bto 

qu:tnUtattve aerosol t•n•r•tor (QAG) to catlbfate 

PM CI!!MS owr a tats• rMge (I( PM ooncentttdon•· 

APPROACH 

F·OCUt researd\ on fh• two mlin PM CE.MS' 

t.chno~l••· light tc:afleflrtg and Nta 

attenuaeion wttlkt inclfll•ln!l thl utllty of u,. 

QAG. 

!valul!te the QAG wilt!. lg:hl AUtMorlfll tnd tMtta 

llttWluation PM Cftl$ 

~ posaiblil •~~ cNwacwl•1kt 

lilodiry theQAO 110 fit l !l'kJfic ... FI: &lion ftMdt 

OPERATING PRINCIPLE 

__,ofNIST-T.-c-no.-. (CJ 

llleasured nebUib:.adon r11t. (R) 

Dried in NIST·Tratnble flew (F) 

Produc. a NIST·Tracub .. • ro.o4 

CO~I!fltration (CJ 

c. = £...!.! F 

REFERENCES/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

1. 

2. 

••. • 

s. IIIHI0111111. _., 

~~~ 

U ghttattsrioq PM CC¥S 

Initial evaluation 

Field evaluautd with 3 dlff•Nnt PM CEMS 

Highl~ linear tflltiOMhtp {tl,. O.t$) 

RESULTS 

Btta •tteonu-ation PM CQ!S 

lnltlll evaluation at ~ervy'a Bruct~ 

Mansfiekl Pow. Ptant 

Hur 1:1 eomp.arlson betw.en factory 

ealiibratlon and QAO on 3 dlfftn.nt unU• 

PS·11 and QAO col"f'detlons very dlfftttnl 

Aerosol eharacterlstlea n"d adJuatmtnl 

Good eomparb4n wtth 2 out of l PS~11 

c;:orrot.tion.$ 

..:::: .... em> ~G 

""""' ' 2J) , ... ..... -,.., .... ;..,.. 

14<0 ... .. --~~ 6. pertk.le site chtribulion 

f:nc:rvaM predtion ot ~llm' 

P•nka. $U of Old QAO .. 

j:L --::.. 

o»llllllllll - -. . . . ... .. .. ' cE!~!> • •r11Cit lf•I'II01W (u ~ 

P•rtkte Size of New QAG 

,,

~ _ i• - --,--- - .. . 

,. t: ~tf!i • e ... • • hdidlo ._..... c-t 

Model developed explalntng dlfforenc. In 3"" 

1'$-11 <Omla<lo<l (Sola I 3) 

~ .. _. .... O,.,C(loiNI- c...oc~....., 

I§fl:z· r~ ft??: • • ''-'*··....,._ •· P•UM ..... - .. - - ) ... / - - i':: - -- J • .! s----It------- J---W... f---- I ··--··- -·-.,._. -u~ ... ., ~ ... u-.-

J= ·~·~ . - ---

~ 

~·--- ~;~~~-- 1=• 1····-·-·-- --- ·r- - ·-- . - - ............. • • • • • • • • • . -··-- -··-~ 

_ ... _ ...........,. 

1 

............. .. . _ liM • ] 

--- ,----

.. ~ .... 

-- I "'.:.::.- ~ "-:::-=:--1 

RESULTS (coni) 

Oymll ut11ty pf tl!• QAG 

TI'IIJ MI'OSOI ~dis _.c:h .,_. prfll!ctllltt l f'ld 

pre<:iseutlng ltll N1W Mb.IH'(~ ~ 

TM Owral sin ot QAO flu bHn~~tc:l cl 

flimlnate Vapot cor~ 111\4 b ... M .. 

--·- - -- ~ ............ --... l fj:: _- - --_-- ::-

• -· , ·-~ --~ • - # '"""-... 

CONCLUSION 

The QAO ~ gen.,. .. an ..,.... ... c......- ,.,.,.._. ..... dilllrtllullon clownMrNm of 

envl .......... ....,.-. CP'PIJ. 

"'lille 

__ GAG hid....._. . ........... !.II .. ,.caw-.- ,..~--~ .. .-.-. ..... -~~ ........... 4 ... ........ 

-- L----------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ ~ 
VES015660.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Oavtd, 

Ktag Pe«erson tagp@coop en onmental.com> 

Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:30 PM 

Ogulei, David 

'John Coope~; andreag@cooperenvironmental.com 

FW: 

I wanted to add a lottie clarification on my response to your l•rst question. We would be able to deliver a unit on site 

within d to 5 months then we should allow 2 to 3 months to get the RATA scheduled and completed. 

Please don't hesitate to contact me If you have any questions. 

Best Regards, 

Krag 

Krag Penerson 

Vice President 

Cooper Environmental Services, LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave Ste. J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

503·670·8335 

From: Krag Petterson [mailto:kragp@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: WedneSday, July 17, 2013 3:32 PM 

To: 'Ogulei.David@epa.gov' 

Cc: 'andreag@cooperenvironrnental.com'; 'John Cooper' 

Subject: 

Mr. Ogulei, 

Andrea asked me to provide you with some responses to the questions you sent to her In your email dated June 21, 

2013. My responses to each que>tlon are given in red. In addition I have attached several flies in response to these 

questions as well. 

I am particularly interested In receiving an update on the followu>g areas: 

1. Commercial availabohty of the Xact multi-metals CEMS. 

The Xact CEMS is avao ab~ commercially from Cooper Envoronmental Services, llC. (CES) Pall Corpotatioo 

dl><:ontlnued fts license In early february of I his year and since !hal time C£5 has been marketing and 

manufacturing both the Xact625 and Xact 640 and 645 (CEMS models). 

Xact 640 (Multi·Metals CEMS)- All CEMS sales have been In the United Stal es. 

Eli Lilly - 1 unit 

US Army-3 units 

CES- This demonstnatlon unit has been used for testing sponsored by various organlullons including U.S. EPA. 

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and Ell lilly. 

X act 620/625 

Korea- 6 units purchased by National Institute of Envoronmental Research 

VES015660 
China - 9 units purchased by varcous Envoronmental Monitoring Centers 

Canada - 8 units Ontario Ministry of Environment, Environment Canada, Quebec Mimstry of Environment, 

University of Toronto, University ol Dalhousie, and a smelting facility 

New Zealand - 1 unit- secondary lead smelter 

Austroila 1 umt- Queensland EPA 

Unit.ci Stotes 3 units- U. Mus., Mossouri DEQ. U.S. EPA 

We have known competition for the ambient market in China from FPI and Skyray (both Chonese 

companoes). We have also heard that FPI produces a mufti-metals CEMS but cannot confirm this. 

We have no known competotlon outside of China. 

2. Applicability/feasibility/reliability of the Xact multi-metals CEMS for measuring emissions ftom heterogeneous 

waste streams. 

The Xact and the filter chemistry utilized by ~he Xa~ have demonstrated the ability to ~ke 

measurements in wide variety of stack conditions. Testing with the Kact and its filter 

chemistry has occurred on stacks burning fflany different fuel types including coal (sub·bit , 

lignite and bitumi nous), natural gas, and diesel fuel and testing has occurred at facilities 

with different pollution controls like ESP's, baghouses, and wet scrubbers. The xact has 

been tested on facilit ies with stack temperatures ranging from lee to 450 degrees Fahrenheit 

and ranging in .aisture content up to at least 29S. In addition the Xa~ has de.onstrated 

accuracy in the presence of a wide range che.ical species likely to be present in stack 

effluent. 

One of the strengths of the xact is t hat t he saMple col lecti on is separated from the K·ray 

analysis. This means t hat t he more sensitive component s of the analysis system are never 

exposed to stack effluent. In addition because the Xact collects a sample for a defined 

l ength of ti~e (for xa ple 

15 minutes) this ~eans that the filter trapping cheoi stry is refreshed with every sa~ple 

eliodnating the proble~s with the cheaistry becoolna spent over tl~ . Also the Xact employs 

sample dilution prior to the filter trapping allowing many of the stack gas components and 

the dew point to be diluted to their optimal ranges. Finally, we would recoa.end dyna~ic 

spiking procedures in erfo ~lng RATA 's, similar to those used by Ell Lilly in their 

al t ernative monitoring petition. Dynamic spiking allows the Xact to be chall enged by a known 

concentration of metals in the presence of potentially interfering components f rom the stack 

ga s. 

I ' ve attached two files with details on the range of stack conditions over which the Xact has 

been tested. 

l ) Method 301 Repor~ pdf - please see section 7 

2) Pall Comments on the Secondary Lead Smelter MACT Rule .pdf - these give additional 

details on places t he Xact has been tested . 

3. Case studies documenting application and/or deployment of the Xact multi·metafs CEMS. 

Please see the files above. In additoon I would add the folfowin& documents flst.cl below 

1) Yanca-2006 · Paper published In the Journal of the Air and Waste Management Assodatoon 

documentmg the Method 301 validation of the Xact. 

2) EP-0·07·026 Final report and Appendix A.pdf- paper documenting the Xact's performance during an 

EPA sponsored Small Business Innovative Research grant. The RATA procedures used at Ell lilly were 

performed on a coal fired source. 

3) Xact 625 ETV Report.pdf-this was st\Jdy was done on an ambient unit but demonstrates the accuracy 

of the technology 

2 

VES015661 
4) Xcem.pdf- an Army Corps of Engineers study of the Xact's performance on Army's hazardous waste 

Incinerators. 

S) Feasibility of using the Xact Multi-metals CEMS as a Mercury Monitor on Coal Ftred Power Plants.pdfpresentation given at the EUEC conference in 2011 and documents our comparison with Method 308 

for mercury. 

4. list of locations/facilities where the Xact muit•·metals CEMS is currently deployed and operating for any reason. 

I've listed the f~cili es were the xact CEMS was deployed 

1. Eli llllv's Tippecanoe lilborntories, lilfayette IN-Deployed and opernted for 6 years. The facility Is 

under new owncrsh1p and the Xact is no loncer operated. 

2. U.S. Army - Tooele UT munitions test fumace - It operated periodically at this facility as the U.S. Army 

tested procedures for burning different types of munitions. 

3. U.S. Army - Tooele, UT production furnace. The Xact was installed at this facility but was never 

operated because regulations were never required for it. 

4 . U.S. Army - Crane, IN production furnace. The Xact was Installed at this facility but was never operated 

because reaulations were never required for lt. 

5. How beryllium emisSIOns are typic.alfy handled given that the Xact multi-metals CEMS cannot quantify beryllium. 

Efi Ully was only client that utlhted the Xact CEMS for compliance purposes It handl~d the beryllium issue as 

follows (quoted from Ully's AMP) 

"Because the XACT is Incapable of measuring bery11ium (Be), Lilly has developed a delaull value for beryllium emissions 

Fortunately, beryllium is a scarce element that Is nol used In Lilly pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. Lilly has 

examtned all its manufacturing processes and associated process construction materials (e.g. alloy steels) and found no 

lndlcallon that beryllium should be present. Therefore. Lilly believes that a conservatively calculated default value for 

beryllium os technically defensible 

Trace levels of betyflum are possible 11'1 raw materials and ground water Uly has sampled its liquid waste and found only 

$p0flldic "hits" of beryl hum at levels close ID the detecilon hmiiS Lilly has also done some lomlled sampling of plant trash. 

some of which might be proCessed In th$ solid-iquid lnanerator, and some low-levels of beryllium were reported Fa< the 

purposes or calculating a conservabve default ermsSJon eoncentrabOn, Lilly has assumed that an loquid and solid wastes 

fed to the solid-IJCiuld Incinerator contain Be at the maximum levels detected: 1 0 ppm In the solid waste and 0.01pprn In 

the liquid wastes The default emission concentration was then calculated using the maximum waste feed rates from the 

CPT plan, and an LVM system removal efficiency (SRE) of 98% (which is a factor of two less lhan the design SRE of 99% 

and a factor of 20 less I han lhe SRE of 99.9% obtained during lhe CPT of another Lilly lnclneratOf with a virtually Identical 

scrubber system) The resulbng value was just over 1 ug/dscm. To be more conservative, Ll"y has chosen 2 ug/dscm as a 

default value. Therefore, a ~alue or 2 ugldscm will be added to the measured LVM emission before comparison to the 

emi551on standard llmK II the CPT data or any other evidence lnd•cates tile default value Is not appropriate. H will be 

&djUSied accordingly." 

6. Estimated timeline lor deployment or the X.>ct multo-metals CEMS at an existing facility. i.e., from order date to 

operation. What are the potential challenges? 

We believe that a 9 month time line Is sufficient and Includes manufacturing, shipping installation and RATA 

testing. 

Krag Petterson 

Vice President 

Cooper Environmental Services, UC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave Ste. J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

3 

VES015662 
503-670-8335 

VES015663 
VES015664.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Garnett, Kim 

Wednesday, Ootober 08, 2014 10:25 AM 

Ogulei, David 

FW: Question 

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 16,2013 3:53PM 

To: Garnett, Kim 

Cc: 'John Cooper' 

Subject: Question 

llcllo Kim. 

Please accept my apologies for the delay in our ~ponse. I bavc filled in the blanks below 3> well n> offered a 

ltttlc bit of extra inforruation, just in cnsc. It's nlways diJ!icult to give a price without a few qualtficrs on 

instruments like these ... 

Tlw l'irsl costs fot'j)urchasc/install:lllon/ccrtiOcntion/tmiuing of a MM CEMS are anticipated to be 

approximlltcly $365.000 - $40 000~. The instrument runs about $260.000 of th:ll cost. Annual costs will 

likely be nbout $25.1100.** 

*Facrors such a.< transportll?llgllt. IY!/110/1' contmllpolling options. sampling intr:n•al (i.e. shorter sompling 

iflfl'r'l·ol• require more rape). and iMrallmion complesitie.< n·i/1 haw? art impact 011 thl' t'II'CI'tlll initi11/ budge/for 

M.lfCEMS. 

••,rnmml costs depe11d large~v 011 .rampling illlerw1l. For a 30 min me sampling i111e11·al. filter ltlpe costs run 

uboul S/9.5/JOI~ear. 1 5-mbm/e sampling inflm·aL• double 1l101amoun1 mmtml~t·. In adtfwun, n·e recommend 

1ha1 comJXmh•s hudge1 for an ammal X-ruy luhe replacemem and re-<·alibrotion (app.1· Ji5-6K). Amwallabor 

general(• requirf!< one tedmif'ion appmximarelt• .~-10 lmurs per rnomh for tape change.< 0111/ general operatio11 

(111(/ mttlllll'trance task<. 

I hope tbh help$. Plea>e don't hesitate 10 contact me if you lmvc questions. 

!lest Regards, 

Andren Geiger 

Pm)••t'l MartuJ:tn·!£m•iromnc!!11al Scterrti.\1 

COOIJCr Envii\>IUllCOtnl Services, LLC 

101 ~0 SW N>n>bll' Aw. Sunc J6 

l'unlun<l. OR Q722J 

303-670-8127. ""' 0 

<UldQ;dC I! 'i'-'l(lrro:O\ U))ftiDeflL'IlCOin 

\\"'\\'\to SOOJ'!C!!'n\ tror~ntalrom 

lnnu.·utiun ,., ;itollitoring 

Conlidcnualny NQri<:e Titl\ ~·mall and an)' anachmaw. may contam contidcmiaJ information inl~ndOO ,.nl'l!l) ror the \I'IC nfthc: 

addrc,<.tC. I rthoc reader of this mc:,~!,"t is not lht Intended rttip1cn1. •my diS.1ribuliOtL cop)•ing. or u~e o( lhitt- e---mail or its anachmeniS 

IS prohib•h:d. If you received this mt'Ssa~· in «:rror. plt:L\C nuufy I be sender imox.."diately by e-.ma1l o1ttl delete thi_, mc:Ro.tgc ;and any 

COflll!':". Thank yo\1, 

VES015664 
2 

VES015665 
VES015666.pdf 
'' 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION S 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

REPLY TOlHe ATTEHliON OF' 

Douglas Harris, General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, Jllinois 62201 

Re: Notification of locompletcncss of 40 C.l'.R.. Part 71 Permit Renewal Application 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed the Clean Air Act (CM) Title V 

ptmn.it renewal application that Veolia ES Te~hnical Solutions, L.L.C., Sauget, lll in ~ {Veolia) 

subrnined on April9, 2013. Veolia operates undet· a federal Title V Penn it to Operate No. VlL- 12716300103-08-01, which EPA i~ d oo September 12, 2008, p ursuant to Title V of the 

CAA and its i.mplementiog regulations at 40 C.F.R. Part 71. Veolia's penni! expires on 

October 12,2013. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § ?l .S(a)(l)(iii), Veolia's renewal application is 

timely. 

EPA has reviewed Veolia's Title V pem1it reoewal application for completeness pursuant to the 

criteria ill 40 C.F.R. § 71 .5(aX2), which requires, among other things, that the ioformatioo in the 

application must be sufficient to evaluate the subject source and its application and to detennioe 

all applicabl~ requirements. EPA has determined that Veolia's Title V peirnit renewal 

application is incomplete. In order for EPA to deem the renewal application complete and for 

Veolia to continue to operate 1mder its existing permit until EPA issues a renewed permit, Veolia 

must subnlit the following information no later than August I, 2013: 

I. Citation and description of all applicable requirements. Pur.;uant to 40 C.F.R. 

§ 71.5( c)( 4), tbe renewal application must ioclude: (i) citations to and descriptions of all 

applicable requirements, and (ii) a description of, or reference to, any applicable test 

method for determioiog compliance with each applicable requirement. Pursuant to 40 

C.P.R.. § 71.5(cX3Xvi), Vc:olia mw."l identify any restrictions on source operation that 

affect emissions or any work practice standards, wh~ awlicablo, for all regulated 

pollutants at the source. 

VES015666 
2. Initial compliance plan and compliance certification. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 7I.5(cX8) 

and (9), Veolia must provide the facility's compliance status and compliance plao for 

each unique combination of applicable requirements and emissions units at the facility. 

You must list all compliance methods (e.g., monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting) 

you used to determine compliance "~th each applicable requirement. For all 

requirements for which the source is not in compliance, you must include a compliance 

schedule. Veolia may submit the information required by 40 C.P.R. § 71.5(c)(8) and (9) 

on EPA Form 5900-86 (I-COMP), which is available at: 

http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqpslpermits/p71tonns.html. 

3. Description and justification of emissions estimation methods. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 

§ 71.5(cX3Xviii), Veolia must provide sample calculations and the necessary 

documenwion upon which you relied to estimate emissions from each emissions unit 

(e.g., copies of relevant pages of stack test reports, AP-42 section(s), industry 

publications, etc).

1 If emission factors arc used, Veolia must explain whether or oot more 

accurate emissions estimation methods are available for the source, and how you 

determined that the emission factors you chose are applicable to your specific somce. 

See In the Matter of ~1ited States Steel Corporation - Granite City Works, Petition 

Nwnber V -2009-03 (January 31 , 2011) at 14. 

4. A listing of all active air permits and consent orders (if applicable) issued by a state or 

federal agency. EPA believes that V eolia bas received several construction pennits, 

andtherefore, that tbe information provided in Section K, Form 5900· 79 (GIS) is not 

complete. For each active permit, please identifY the permitting authority, the date the 

permit was issued, date of expiration (if applicable), and type of pennit (e.g., 

construction, operating, etc). 

5. Process flow diagrams showing all emissions units and air pollution control equipment, 

and a plot plan showing buildings and process areas. Veolia must label the emission 

points, process equipment, air pollution control equipment, stacks and vents. 

6. A listing aod description of any inapplicable requirements, for which Veolia desires a 

nonapplicabil ity determination in the permit. Veolia must identify and include a concise 

sununary of any inapplicable requirements as well as a complete explanation of why 

Veolia believes each is not applicable to your source. Pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 71.6(f), 

EPA may only extend a permit shield to requirements that are included and are 

specifically identified in the pem1it, or EPA, in acting on the permit application or 

1 Note tbat the S3111plo volatile organic material (VOM) enussions calculation provided oo page 20 (Appendix A) for 

the "Drum Qusher" refers to "Summation of Pounds VOM from Column 1 above;" however, Column J of the table 

on Page 19 is titled "Comments." Thi• is probably a typographical etror. 

2 

VES015667 
revision, determines in writing that other requirementS specifically identified are not 

applicable to the source, and the permit includes the determination or a concise summary 

thereof. 

Should Veolia wish to request confidential treatment for business information, such infom1ation 

musl be submitted separately along with a claim of confidentiality a~ provided in 40 C.F.R. l'art 

2, Subpart B. All confidential business i.uJormation must be clearly and properly marked, and 

copies of the renewal application suitable for public inspection must be submined. EPA will 

process all b~iness confidentiality claims following the procedures found in 40 C.F.R. Part 2. 

Consistent with 40 C.F.R. § 71.5(d), the responsible official must certify all information Voolia 

submitS in response to this request. EPA is available to meet or teleconference with you to 

clarify any of the information requested in this letter. To arrange a meeting or teleconference, or 

if you have any questions, please contact David Ogulei, of my staff, at (312) 353-0987. 

Sincerely, ') 

' ,i .. -· 

L~/JU?t.U~ G. nevieve Damico 

(. · hief 

Air Penn its Section 

3 

VES0!5668 
VES015669.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Nancy L Paddock <nancy.peddock@veoliaes.com> 

Tuesday, Oeoember 10, 2013 8:29AM 

Ogulei, David 

Dennis J Warchol 

Title V Revisions 

Attachments: Emissions Cales from Application from Veolla 12·9·13.xlsx; A4 Form PTE Summary(1 or 2) 

rev5dean.doc; AS Form PTE Summary(2 of 2)rev5dean.doc; cUnlt 3 (1 of 2)rev5.doc; aUnit 2 

(1 of 2)rev5.doc; IDrum Crusherrev5.doc; eUnit 4 (1 of 2)rev5.doc; VeOIIa Page 18rev5 

clean.pdf 

David, 

We've corrected errors/typos and hopefully all the numbers add up now. We've also addressed 

organic compounds as HAPs. Your spreadsheet has been modifted as well, hopefully you'll find this 

helpful. Attached you will find the following; lers see if these items will get the job done for us! 

1. Your spreadsheet with our updates in RED. 

2. Revised FORM PTE's 

3. Revised FORM EM ISS's for Unlt2, Unit3, Unit4 and Drum Crusher 

4. Revised Page 18 from the Narrative. 

Let me know if you need anything else. 

Nancy Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolla ES Technical Solutions, L.L C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 {X-115) 

618.271.2128 {fax) 

Nancy,Paddoc;k®Veo!Ji!ES.com 

WWW,\feo!tiiES cpm 

This e-mail message from Veolla ES Technical Solutrons, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the Intended redpient(s) and may 

contain confidential and privileged Information. Any unauthorized review, use, dlsdosure or distribution Is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete It from all computers. 

VES015669 
VES015670.pdf 
PTE as reported byVeolia on EPA Form 5900·85 (tpy) 

1 Unit 1 " '~'"" ., .. r soz1 . !Aold

1

HAP (To!!!) 

0.6156 2.8 . 

7 

2,,8 7.7 

7 

0.022 1 t 1.04 

VOCI ' ' NOll 

[UNIT N2 

[UHIT#3 M l 41 0.64041 2.911 2.911 7.71 0.02211 10.4 

3.11 61.61 1.941 8.821 16.921 51.761 0.06951 11.49 

1.45 0.241 

[UH ITI4 13.1 

IMP· ! I I 0.23871 I I I I I I 0.041 

MP·Z ~87 0.041 

DRUM CRUSHER 3,87 0.2481 

ITANK •2 0. 1348 0.00021 

-ANK N4 0.0203 3.65£·051 

TANKM6 I I 0.0133 

TANK §8 0.025! 

TANK #10 0.012! 

TANK 420 I I 0.041 

TANK #30 I I 0.0203 

TANK # 40 I I 0.0143 

rANK HSO I I 0.0085 

TANK M60 I I 0.025< 

rANK #300 I I 0.1454 

TANK #302 I I 0.422' 

TANK #304 I I 0.3094 

:TANK #306 I I 1.29 

ITANK #308 I I 1.62 

[TANK #310 I I 2.1 8 

ITANK #312 I I 3.23 

[TANK #314 I I 0.4736 

4.6 

0.00011 

3.65E·OS 

2.58E·O 

1.531l·O: 

4.62E· 

).00 

O.OOOQ 

).0006 

).00_2:! 

• BLDG I I 2.561 I I I I I I 0.1 

11 3.79 0.248 +.51 0.343 o.oz; 

UGITIVB EQUIP LEAKS I I 0.0391 I I I I I I 0.0014 

~ l.095 I 0.031 0.421 I 0.031 I 0.031 01 0.0001 

EGENZ 0.095 0.03 0.42 0.03 0.03 0 0.00011 

FACILITY TOTALS 31.04 23.6 74.95 3.196 14.93 22.63 67.25 0.1137 33.61 

TotaJHromarmlltadcin 30,94 23.6 . ·, 1~95 ·: .q,;·•w~,;.?.v-.1'4.93 wt!-'"111. '1<·,. 67,,25 ' · 0.1137 33.41 

VESOI5670 
PTE •• reported byVeoUa for Fee Purposes on EPA Form 5900·84 (q>y) 

[mission tinlt co VOC. ~ PMZ";$ ,.# PMl!l !'?- ~"''' PM 502 ' Uacl HAP !Tor.! 

UNIT 112 6.6 0.9 4 0.6 156 2.8 2.8 7.7 0.0221 10.0207 

UNIT 113 6.6 0.9 4 0.6404 2.91 2.91 7.7 0.0229 10.1348 

UNIT 114 13.86 3.1 6!.6 1.94 16.92 16.92 50.76 0.0695 10.7173 

LABPACK R£PACK 1.45 0.2418 

MP· I 0.2387 0.0495 

MP-2 0.2387 0.0495 

lRUM CRUSHER 3,87 0.248 

BFBLOG 2.56 00188 

BOILER Ill 3.79 0 .. 248 4.51 0.343 0.343 0.343 0.027 

EGENI 0.095 0.03 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.03 O.o3 0.0001 

EGEN2 0.095 0.03 042 0.03 0.03 O.oJ 0.03 o.ooo·1 

FACILITY TOTAL 31.04 13.57 74.95 3.60 23.03 23.03 66.25 0.1145 31.5 

Breakdown of HAP Emissions :tpy) 

. Bulk Feed Total 

Drum LabPack Building 

Polhatant UnltU UnlUJ Unit 114 Crusber Repack MP·l MP-2 (SF Bldril 

HC1f'l:l2 9.92 10.03 10,4 30.4 

Hg 0.0125 0.013 0.0393 0.06 

As 00088 0.0092 0.0278 0.05 

Be 0.0080 0.0092 0.0278 o.os 

Ben1.ene 0.246 0.2418 0.0495 0.0495 0.0!86 0.61 

Cd 0.0221 0.0229 0.0695 0.11 

Cr 0.0080 0.0092 0.0278 o.os 

Sb 0.0066 0.0092 0.0278 0.05 

Pb 0.0221 0.0229 0.0695 0.11 

Nl 0.0088 0.0092 0.0278 0.05 

Dloxlns/Furons 1.92E-08 1.20£-07 6.65£-07 0.000001 

Notes: 

1. No emissions reported lor the rest oftbe emission units li.sted in Form 5900-85. 

2. No HAl' emissions were reported for Boiler #L NH3 emissions of0.144 tpy reported for Boll or •r. 

3. No breakdown ofHAP emissions provided lor EGEN I and EGEN2. 

VES015671 
Pollutant 

HC1/C12 

H~ 

As 

Be 

PTE as reported by Veolia on EPA Form EMISS (tpy) 

(August 2013 Addendum) 

Breakdown of HAP Emissions tpy) 

Drum Lab Pack 

Unitll2 Unlt#J Unit#4 Crusher Reoack MP·l 

4.09 4.09 11.57 

0.00114 0.00114 0.0319 

0.0081 0.0081 0.0226 

0.0081 0.0081 0.0226 

VES015672 
Benzene 0.00006 0.2418 0.0495 

Cd 0.0202 0.0202 0.0564 

Cr 0.0081 0.0081 0.0226 

Sb l.SE-05 1.5E-05 4.9E-OS 

Pb 0.0202 0.0202 0.0564 

Ni 0.00002 0.00002 4.8E-OS 

Se 3.7E-05 3.7E-05 0.00012 

Methanol 0.4069 

Dioxins/Furans 1.92E-08 2.00E·08 6.05£-08 

Orgamc HAP Compounds 

Notes: 

0.5287 

1. No emissions reported for the rest of the emission units Us ted in For 

2. No HAP emissions were reported for Boiler #1. NH3 emissions of 0. 

3. No breakdown of HAP emissions provided for EGEN1 and EGEN2. 

TANKS 

TankiD Benzene 

TANK 112 2.18E·05 

TANK 114 2.47E·04 

TANK 116 7.73E·06 

TANK#S 9.61E-06 

TANK1110 l.B2E-04 

TANK 1120 3.11E-05 

TANK 1130 2.55E-04 

TANK #40 3.07E· 05 

TANK #50 B.03E· 06 

TANK#60 4.98E-OS 

TANK#300 2.71E-OS 

TANK#302 1.84£-04 

TANK #304 5.4SE·OS 

TANK#306 9.59E·OS 

TANK#308 2.15£-04 

TANK#310 2.48E-04 

TANK#312 3.42E-04 

TANK #314 2.05E·04 2.21E·03 

VES015673 
soz Lead HAP(Totall 

7.7 0.0202 4.17 

7.7 0.0202 4.16 

50.76 0.0564 11.78 

0.24-18 

0.0495 

0.0495 

0.9356 

2.18E·OS 

2.47£-04 

7.73£-06 

9.61£-06 

1.82£-05 

3.11E·OS 

2.55E·04 

3.07£-05 

8.03E-06 

4.98E-05 

2.71£-05 

1.84E-04 

5.4SE-05 

9.59E·OS 

2.14E·04 

2.84£-04 

3.42E-04 

2.05E-04 

0.0188 

0.027 

0.0001 

0.029 0.0071 

0.029 0.0071 

66.25 0.0968 21.4 

66.19 0.0968 21.41 

Bulk Feed Total 

Building 

MP-2 (Bf Bldl!) 

19.8 

0.03 

0.04 

0.04 

Sum of HAPs 

tsee belowl 

4.16 

4.16 

11.78 

0.2418 

0.0495 

0.0495 

0.93566 

2.18E·05 

2.47E-04 

7.73£-06 

9.61E-06 

1.82E-04 

3.11E·05 

2.SSE-04 

3.07E-05 

8.03E-06 

4.98E·05 

2.71E-05 

1.84B-04 

5.45£-05 

9.59E-05 

Z.ISE-04 

2.48E-04 

3.42E·04 

2.05E·04 

0.0188 

0.0001 

0.0071 

0.0071 

21.4 

22.41 

Revised Unit #2 FORM EM ISS (rtv5) & FORI 

Revised Unit #3 FORM EM ISS (rev51 & FORI 

Revised Unit #4 FORM EM ISS (rev51 & FORI 

VES015674 
0.0495 0.0188 0.36 

0.10 

0.04 

0.0001 

0.0968 

0.0001 

0.0002 

9.97E-08 

Revised Drum Crusher FORM EMISS trevS) 

'U1 5900-85. 

144 tpy reported for Boller Ill. 

VES015675 
M PTE for plant 

M PTil for plant 

M PTE for plant 

VES0!5676 
TPY Emis.~ions 

Pollutant Potential to Emit 2012 Actual 2011 Actual 2010 Actual 

(PTE) Emissions Emissions Emissions 

PM 13.93 107 1.12 1.1 

PM10 12.55 1.07 

PM2.5 1.07 

so2 66.19 0.53 0.49 0.49 

NOx 74.11 56.56 58.16 57. 1 

VOM 15.63 1.93 1.5 1 1.62 

co 30.85 1.16 1.21 1.41 

Lead 0.0968 0.000 18 

Total HAPs 21.41 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00001 (NR) 

Arsenic (As) <0.10 0.0000251 

Benzene < 0.40 0.0019 

Beryllium (Be) < 0.05 l.76E-07 

Cadmium (Cd) 3.11E-05 

Chromium (Cr) 5.46E-05 

Dioxins/Furans 6.35E-OR 

Hydrogen Chloride 1.89 2.03 

Lead see above 

Mercury (Hg) 0.055 0.0017 

Nickel (Ni) 0.0000 I (NR) 

Selenium (Se) 0.0001 <NRJ 

Organic HAPs 0.04 

VESOI5677 
2009 Actual 2008 Actual 

E missions Emissions 

1.07 1.04 

0.52 0.496 

55.23 54.76 

1.74 1.7 

1.67 1.95 

2.09 3.56 

VESOI5678 
4.166 

4.166 

11.78 

O.l41 K 

0.0495 

0.0495 

0.9356 

2.1 8£-0S 

2. 7E~ 

7.7JE-06 

9.6LLU\6 

t. 2E~S 

3.1 LL!-oS 

2.SSil.Q4 

3.07E..(JS 

K.OJIS·06 

4.98E·OS 

2. 71 E·OS 

1.846·04 

S.4Sll·05 

9.59E·OS 

2.151l·04 

2.481!·04 

3.421l·04 

2.0SE·04 

0.0 18~ 

0.0001 

0.0142 

21.42355 

2.56 7.7 4 

2.53 7.7 4 

7.15 50.76 61.6 

0.343 0.021 4.51 

0.031 0.029 0.441 

0.031 0.029 0.441 

12.645 66.245 74.992 

2.7819 

VES015679 
0.0512 0.9 6.6 0.0202 

0.0287 0.9 6.6 0.0202 

0.1894 3.1 13.86 0.0564 

0.0561 1.45 3.79 

0.0993 02381 0.095 

0.2218 02387 0.095 

0.2569 3.87 31.04 0.0968 

0.3517 0.023 

0.2117 0.0252 

2.56 0.0019 

0.0138 0.01 

0.241! 0.1R71 

O.o35 0.0316 

O.Q35 0.2584 

0.9 0.0323 

0.9 0.0088 

3.1 0.0512 

1.45 O.o2~7 

02387 0. 1894 

0.2387 0.0567 

3.87 0.0993 

0.023 0.221& 

0.0252 0.2569 

0.0079 0.3517 

0.0 1 02 117 

0.1871 2.56 

0.03 16 0.0?38 

02584 0.248 

0.0323 0.035 

0.0088 0.035 

15.7009 

15.7009 

VES0l5680 
VES015681 .pdf 
OMS Control No. l060~336 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEOERAL OF£RATING P€RMFT, 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM EMJSS • EMlSSIONS CALCULATIONS 

INSTRUCTIONS, Use til's form to calrulate potEf'ltiaf kl emil (PTE} lor applicability purposes and actual ernissWJns fof- l&e p4..1p01S&$ tor each 

~ unit CON.I'Of d&Wee, or et ~ve ope:ro1.1ng ~ lfted In sec:tlon l of loon GIS. If form FEE does not need to be 

aobnllted w'lh the awka:tion. m not calculate actual f.f1'\issions. 

A. Emissions Unit 10 

Unit 3 (I of 2) 

8. ldenlillcation and Ouantificalioo of Emission$ 

tnstrucOOos: Fnt. li&t each air pOIMont lhe1. is eitl"l:er rtgufMtd bl l'le unll CH prestnt In m&Jor amounts. Second, list arvy other regula6ed pol~ {for lee 

calculation) emined at the uM that have not already been lisied. Each HAP added 10 tfle l &t in this step m:~y be simply li&ted n .. HAP". 

Next, <:ak:ultJte PTE fO¥ applic&bCity pwpos~H znc1 .ctual emissions tor fee purposes fOC" eam listed air pollutant. Do not calcul:lkl PTE for air 

pcA.stants listed sot-ely for tee purposes. lndude a1 fugiives. iw.:loctng those that dtl not eoun1 toward$ a~b!llty, when calculating actual 

emlssiOflS. A1 a minlmiiTI, round 10 !he nearest &enrn of a too for yearly values or tenth of a pound fof OOUty vabe:s. Allach •x.-omple$ « 

cala.Aatlons that ift.tstrates be methodology used. 

Air Pollutants {lnd udlng t'f!9UiatP.d air pol nts and Emission Rates CAS No. 

polll.•tbnt$ lot' whleh the $0urce Is majOf} 

AcWal Potential t() Emit 

Am val 

Erissions Hourty Aoouel 

(tons/yr) (b/hr) (tons/yr) 

PMIPM10/PM2.5 0.5775 2.53 

HCI/CL2 0.9340 4.09 

NOx NA 4.0 

co 2.31 6.6 

S02 NA 7.7 

VOM 8.0 0.90 

Hg 0.0026 0.00114 7439-97-6 

As 0.0018 0.0081 7440-38-2 

Be 0.0018 0.0081 7440-41-7 

Cd 0.0046 0.0202 7440-43-9 

Cr 0.0018 0.0081 7440-47-3 

Sb 0.0000342 0. 0000 L 5 7440-31-5 

VES015681 
VES015682 
VES015683.pdf 
OMS CM rol No. 2060·0l36 

U.S. ENIIlRONMENTAI. PROTEC'TION AGENCY 

A.PPLICAHON FOR FEDERAL OPERATING Pf IT, 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM EMISS • EMISStONS CALCULATIONS 

INSTRUCTIONS: Use tljs form to ealo.Aate potential lO emit (PTE) lOr applbbiity purpose$ and acwal etr\issiotl$ tor See purposes for e&dl 

emissions unit oon1rol deoke. or altemrive operating soenario id8f166ed in section 1 ol form GIS. ff fonn FeE Cloes noc need ~o be 

wbnitt.ed w11h 1M oPI)Iebtion. do not Ct~lc::ul()te t1Clu31 emi$SIOns. 

A. Emissions lAW 10 

Unit 4 (I of 2) 

B. ldenllflcalion and Ouentiflca1Jon of Etnlssloos 

lnstruc1lons: First, lsi escn arr polkltant that is Hher regula\ed at !he wVt or res«~t in major eroount&. Seoonc:l, fist any ocher regul* d Fdtllo:IN (rot' fee 

eak:Oiatlon) emnted at tOO unit that have not * e&dv been isWd. Each HAP added &o the lst ln l'lls step may be sfnply lis.OO as -HAP". 

Next, calc\A&te PTE tor applicablity pwposes and actual emissions for fee pwpos.es for aad't li6ted air . Oo nol caJcut!ltO PTE fOf air 

pollutant$ lit ttd sotely W see purposes. Include all T.ive$, lnc:k.ICing tho9e Chat do not count lowacds eppllcabillt}•, when calculatn;J ac.1.ual 

erni&OOns. At a minirrun, round 10 lhe MareS! h ol a n fOf y-&&rly \';!!lues or tenth or a pound lOt' hOurly values. Attach exafll)les of 

calCulatiOns that llklsr'al.eS the med'IOOOiOOY U$00. 

Air Pollul..,.s Orte:lucfing rCJ91.Utcd air potlul:&nl$ end Emi$'$kl0 Fl&tes CAS No. 

pollutartts for wtlk h the souroe is majoc) 

Actual Potential to Emit 

Annual 

Emissions Holl'ly Amual 

t~/yr) (lb/hr) (tons/yr) 

PM 1.63 7.15 

HCVCL2 2.64 11.57 

NOx NA 61.6 

co 6.52 13.86 

S02 INA 50.76 

VOM 8.0 3.1 

IJ-Ig 0.0073 0.0319 7439-97-6 

As 0.0052 0.0226 7440-38-2 

!Be 0.0052 0.0226 7440-41-7 

Cd 0.0129 0.0564 7440-43-9 

Cr 0.0052 0.0226 7440-47-3 

Sb ~.00001 1 0.0000486 7440-31-5 

VE$015683 
VES015684 
VES015685.pdf 
OMB Conlrof No. Z060.0336 

U.$. ENVJRONMENTAL PROTECTION AG£NCY 

APPUCADON FOR FEDERAL OPERATjNQ PERMIT, 40 CFR PAAT 71 

FORM PTE - POTEHTIAl TO EMrT SUMMARY 

STRUCTIONS: Complete l:hi& form onoe for the it . You may lind il helpM '0 oompl- form EMJSS for e:&eh emlssiMs unil berore completing 

'hi$ fOrm. For each emi$$10ns ri h eml$sioi"'S thai ooln! towards 1\W'~ty. fst the em~sicns unit 10 and the PTE fof the air 

pc6.rtants listed below. If there are other air pollutants no1 liMed btlow for wt'lk:h lhe source I$ a majof ~. provide anac:twneots 

noming 1M ~ pOik.rlant 8nd $ho\\itlg caiOJtaclon ol the 1Qtai for thai pololanl. Round values to the nearest tenth of a ton. Add an 

values together il ~ column 00<1 enter the tOUIJ in 'he space proWdecJ at the boltc:m of the teble. Alto repot~ ftese tolals in 

aeccioo J at tonn GI'S. 

Emls$1ons Unit 10 Regulaled Ak ants end Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

NOx voc soz PhilO co .._ HAP 

(tons/ yr) {tons/yr) {rons/yr) {tons/yr) {tcns/ yr) hons/yr) Uonst'yr) 

Unit2 4.0 0.9 7.7 2.53 6.6 0.0202 4.166 

Unit3 4.0 0.9 7.7 2.53 6.6 0.0202 4.166 

Unit 4 61.6 3.1 50.76 7.15 13.86 0.0564 11.78 

Lab Pack Repack 1.45 0.241 8 

Material Processing 1 0.2387 0.0495 

Material Processing 2 0.2387 0.0495 

Drum Crusher 3.87 0.9356 

Tank2 0.0230 2.1 8&05 

Tank 4 0.0252 2.47E-04 

Tank6 0.0079 7.73£-06 

Tank S 0.01 00 9.61£-06 

Tank 10 0.1871 1.82E-05 

Tank 20 0.031 6 3.11E-05 

Tank30 0.2584 2.55E-04 

Tank 40 0.0323 3.07E-05 

VESOI5685 
I Tank 50 ls.OJE-061 

TOTALS TOTAL ON 2Nb FORM 

VESOI5686 
VES015687.pdf 
OM8 ConttOI N(), l060-0336 

U.$. ENVIRONMENTAl. PROTECTIOtl AGENCY 

APPUCATION FOR FEDERAl. OPERATING PERMIT, 40 Cffi PART 71 

FORM EMISS • EMISSIONS CALCULATIONS 

INSTRUCTIONS: U$e lhi& form \o Q!ltculale poleni&! lo emil (PTE) kit &pp!lcabilily QU'PQSe$ and actusl emi$Si:lns for tee fdPOSE!S for each 

emissions uM. control de'VIce. or alttmative operating scenario identified in secllon I of form GIS. It fonn FEE doss I'M)1 need to be 

submitted wilh fle a;»~lon . dO nol Cllleulcla actual eml3$1ons. 

A Emissions Unit 10 

Unit 2 (1 of2) 

B. ldenl.iflcallon and Quanliftcstion ol Emissk>ns 

n&truefioos~ Fimt. 1161 each air pollllant that is either eg~Aated at lhe unit or pr S«~t in rra;or amounts. Seconi, list any oltter regulo\ed pollu~l'll (for foe 

caiC\IIaOon) emiUed at the unit that have not ateacty been li$ted. Each HAP added to the list In lhie. step may be sinply listed as "HAP". 

Nexa, calctJale PTE for appl cab~ity purposes and aaual emissioos for fee p..rposes for eadl i&ted air pot:utarrt. Oo not e&leukne PTE lOr oir 

I)Oiutenu li$tt<l $dtly for tee purposes. Include t!lll f\tglllves. W'dudlng those thai do not ClOIXrt KIWatds appkabill1y, when calcutaq actual 

emissions. At a minirmm, round lo the ONrel!l lenlh of a ton t()r yearly values 01 " nth ol a pounO fOf howty 1/akles. Anach examples d 

cawauoos th&llklstrates the mectlOOOklOY used. 

Ai $ (inducing regiAelcd air pclutants and Emission Riles CAS No. 

pollJtants fof Yttlkh the 50uroe is maj(:d 

""""' Potential lO Emit 

Annual 

Emissions Hou"y Annual 

(~n /yr) (lb/hr) (100$/ )T) 

PMIPM IOIPM2.5 0.5775 2.53 

HCI/CL2 0.9340 4.09 

NOx NA 4.0 

co 2.31 6.6 

S02 NA 7.7 

VOM 8.0 0.90 

Hg 0.0026 0.00114 7439-97-6 

As 0.0018 0.0081 7440-38-2 

Be 0.0018 0.0081 7440-41-7 

d 0.0046 0.0202 7440-43-9 

r 0.0018 0.0081 7440-47-3 

Sb 0.0000342 0.000015 7440-31-5 

VES015687 
VES015688 
VES015689.pdf 
POLLUTANT PTE POLLUfANT PTE 

(tons/yr) (tonslyr) 

PM 12.62 BENZENE 0.36 

PMIO 12.62 BERYLLTUM O.o4 

PM.1..s 12.62 DIOXIN/FURAN 9.97 X J0'

8 

so2 66.25 HCI/Ch 19.8 

NOx 74.99 LEAD 0.0968 

VOM(OZONE) 15.70 MERCURY 0.03 

co 31.04 METHANOL 0.4069 

TOTAL HAPS 21.4 NICKEL 0.0001 

ANTIMONY 0.0001 ORGANIC HAP 0.5287 

COMPOUNDS 

ARSENIC 0.04 SELENIUM 0 .0002 

The current facility 's PTE is a summation of the potential to emit of each emission unit. 

B. Incinerators: Unit 2, Unit 3, and Unit 4 Emission Standard Requirements 

The regulations applicable to the incinerators are listed below. A listing of any nonapplicable requirements and the reasons for the non-applicability are provided in Appendix 

B. 

1. Visible Emissions 

a. Visible Emissions Limitations 135 lAC 2J2.123(a)J 

The emission of smoke or other particulate matter, with an opacity greater than 30 

percent, into the atmosphere from any emission source shall not be caused or allowed, 

except as allowed by 35 lAC 212. 123(b) and 212.124. 

b. Fugitive Particulate Matter (35 lAC 212.301 and 2U.314J 

T he facility shall not cause or allow the emission of fugitive particulate matter from 

any process, including any material handling or storage activity, that is visible by an 

observer looking generally overhead at a point beyond the propeny line of the source 

unless the wind speed is greater than 40.2 kilometers per hour (25 miles per hour.) 

except as described in 351AC 212.314. 

18 

VES015689 
VES015690.pdf 
OMB Concrol No. 2060oo0336 

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECn ON AGENCY 

APPUCATION FOR FCOERAJ. OPERATING PERMIT. 40 CFR PART 71 

FORM PTE • POTEOITIAI. TO EMIT SUMMARY 

NS RV llON$ ~ CoffiC)Iele IJi.i9 form ooce tor the taclf«y. You may lind lt hef;:Aul to comp6ete bm EMISS tor e&eh P.mlsslons ri. before c~tintJ 

this farm. f« each emissions urit wilh enisslons that OOU'It lOwards appk ebility, list the emissions unit 10 encf the PTE bf tile a!, 

polh.nenl$ listed below. If theft ~ other sir pollutants not lls:ted betow for whlc:h the sotl'ce is a majof source. provide att<lehmMts 

naming the air pollutant and showing calct.iation of the total for that pollutant Romcl values to the nearest tenth ol a ton. Add all 

V111ue$ together in each <:olumn an4 erner the IOial in th e spat» provided at the bottom of ttte lable. Also report these totals in 

secOOo J of form GIS. 

Emissions Urit 10 RagulakMJ Ai Polkltants and Polvtaru for vd1ich the SO\I'c. is Major 

NOx voc soz PMIO co Lead HAP 

(tons/)•r) (tons/yr) (tons/yr) (tons/yo) (tons/yr) (..,s/yr) (tons/ yr) 

Tank 60 0.0512 4.98E-05 

Tank 300 0.0287 2.71E-OS 

Tank 302 0.1894 1.84E-04 

Tank 304 0.0567 5.45E-05 

Tank 306 0.0993 9.59E-05 

Tank 308 0.2218 2.1 5E-04 

Tank 310 0.2569 2.48E-04 

Tank 312 0.3517 3.42E-04 

Tank 314 0.21 17 2.05E-04 

Bulk Solids Storage 2.56 0.0188 

Fugitive Equipment Leaks 0.0738 0.0001 

Boiler I 4.5 1 0.248 0.027 0.343 3.79 

Emergency Generator # 1 0.441 0,035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071 

Emergency Generalor #2 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071 

VES01 5690 
TOTAl.$ 74.99 15.63 66.25 12.62 30.85 0.0968 21.4 

VESOI5691 
VES015692.pdf 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGE.NCY 

APPLICATION FOR FEOE:RAI. OI'EAATING PERMrT. 40 CfR PART 71 

FORM EMISS • EMISSIONS CAI.CUl.ATIONS 

INSTRUCTIONS' V&e N fo:m tO calcU&le potenrlal to emil CPTE} f()( bllfy I)Urposes: and aciUal em~lone for tee pt.rpC!68S tor each 

emissions unit.. control de'oice. or allernetivo operatirlg sctAariO kMnOOM in $eCCiOn I of form G.f$. I form FEE does no1 Mled to be 

subnlt!ed wi:h the aPQication. 00 not caledate actual ~s. 

A. Emissions Unit 10 

Drum Crusher 

8 . ldenliication aocl Quantification of Emissions 

Instructions: First. list each air polluLan t that is eithar regulated at the unit or present in major amounts. Second, iSl My other regu~D td poiUiaN (fof fee 

ca6eolatlon) emhted M lhe unil that have not M'eady been listed. Each HAP added to he ~ in !his s.ap may be sin~ listed as AP" . 

Next, caiNilte PTE for appicabi:ity pt.l1)(ll.i85 and actual elris6ions tor ~ purposes for ach li$ted 8ir poiU:&nt. 00 not taiCU:ne PTE t()f' air 

pollutants lrseed solety for Me putp<)!leS. Include &!I fughive-s. lncldng those thaJ do not comt towatds appllcabilty, ~ c..ak::~Aating edual 

emi&s.iOO$, At t1 minilft.lm, rounct '<> !he nearosc tet'Wh of a ton tor yeerty values or tenth ot a po..m k>r hourly values. Anac:h exall'C)Ies ol 

calculaelons that ltllstrstes the methodology used. 

Ait Polk.catlls ~ regtja!ed a1r po!lu!aO!s: and Emission Aales CAS No. 

I)Oit.MnlS f<>r \'lflieh lhe l$oOU"C. is major) 

A<:IUal Po4enlial to Emit 

Annut.~l 

Emissions 

- Annual (IOO$/y1) ( lb/IYI (IOns/Yr) 

YOM 0.8833 3.87 

Benzene 0.000157 0.00006 71-43-2 

Med1anol 0.0929 0.4069 67-56-1 

Organic Compounds 0.1207 0.5287 

VES015692 
VES015693 
VES015694.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

David, 

Klarich, David <davld.klarlch@veolia.com> 

Monday, March 10, 201 4 3:11 PM 

Ogulei, David 

UnHs 2 and 3 Operation 

Regarding the in-service dates for Unit 2 and Unit 3, Unit 2 came on-line in October, 1986 and Unit 3 came online in November, 1987. 

Please contact me if you have any further questions. 

Dave 

VES015694 
VES015695.pdf 
~THOMPSON ra cosuRNLLP 

Joseph M. Kellmeve: 

p 314.552.&166 

F 314.552.7166 

ellmey~r@lthompso"coburo.c m 

September 9, 2013 

VIA ELECTRONIC ANO CERTD!l'lED MAIL 

Robe1t A. Kaplan 

Regional Counsel 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

kaplan.robert@epa.gov 

Re: ReSPonse to USEPA Correspondence Dated August27, 20 13 Regarding Veolia ES 

Technical Solutions, L.L.C. ("Veolia~) 

Dear Bob: 

Thank you for your follow-up regarding your correspondence dated August 27, 2013 ("August 

27th Letter") concerning communications between Veolia and USEPA Region 5 (''Region 5" or 

"Agency"). 1 believe our telephone conversations have been productive and I look forward to 

working with you to resolve this matter. 

Veolia's response to the August 27th Letter is set forth below. As I related in our conversations, 

the information contained in August 27th Letter answered some of our questions concerning why 

we had not received any response from Region 5 regarding our submissions. 

As you know, on March 28, 2013, Veolia submitted its comments pertaining to RegionS's 

proposal to reopen and modi!)' Veolia's Clean Air Act Title V operating permit ("Title V 

permit"). The following day, March 29, 2013, Veolia mailed a letter to Region 5 in an effort to 

continue to negotiate and resolve the various open issues concerning Veolia's Title V permit 

("March 29th Letter"). Among other items, the March 29th Letter included an o!Ter by Veolia 

to SPend signi:licant resources on additional pollution control equipment at its Sauget fucility. 

The . .March 29th Letter also conveyed Veolia's request for a meeting with Region 5 to further 

dlsc\ISS Veolia's olfers at resolution. In addition, because Veolia's Title V permit is essential to 

its business operations-and critical to Veol.ia's ability to remain a viable regional cmployerVeolia carbon copied both U.S. Representative William Enyart and U.S. Representative John 

Shimkus on the March 29th Letter. 

After sending the March 29th Letter, we learned that both congressmeu received the letter 

shortly after it was mailed and, therefore, we also assumed that Region 5 received the March 

29th Letter a few days after its' mailing. 

l homp•or: Coburn LLP I Attomoys Cl Law I OM US Bonk Plaza I S7. Louis. Mi»ovri 63101 

f 3l4.552.60CO I F 314.552 .700a ) www.thompsoncobum.com 

VESOI5695 
September9, 2013 

Page2 

Having no indication that Region 5 did not, in fact, receive the March 29th Letter, Veolia 

assumed that Region 5 would eventually respond. However, a$ the months passed, and still 

having not received a response from Region 5, Veolia reached out to various elected officials to 

establish a line of communication with the Agency. 

The first lime Veolia had any indication that USEPA did not receive the March 29th Letter was 

at a June 5, 2013 meeting with George C.r.crniak. However, at that time, Veolia had already 

reached out to the Agency through various elected officials and understood that Regional 

Admini,trator Hedman had agreed to meet with Veolia concerning the reopening ofVeolia's 

Title V permit. Veolia also believed that Regional Administrator Hedman requested that Veolia 

provide her with a document plior to the meeting setting forth the background for the permit 

reopening and Veolia's positions on various important issues involved with Veolia's Title V 

penn it. 

Veolia drafted a letter and memorandum in response to what it believed was Regional 

Administrator Hedman's request(" August 2nd Letter"). Veolia did not mail the August 2nd 

Letter to the Regional Administrator. Rather, Veolia again reached out through various elected 

officials to communicate with the Agency. 

Ba.ed on this series of events, we were surprised to learn that Regional Administrator Hedman 

had not agreed to meet with Veolia and had not requested the August 2nd Letter. As you 

indicate, there bas apparently been a misunderstanding and a miscommunication regarding these 

issues. 

While there may have been a misunderstanding, I can assure you that-at no time-{)id Veolia 

try to make a false record concerning the would-be meeting between it and the Regional 

Administrator. Veolla was merely expressing its thanks to the Regional Administrator for 

agreeing to mcet·-a fact that it believed to be true at the time the August 2nd Letter was drafted. 

To the extent that the Regional Administrator never agreed to such a meeting, we apologize for 

this misunderstanding. 

As you point out, the August 2nd Letter also includes Veolia's concern that the Agency breached 

its verbal agreement concerning the timi.ug of Veolia's Comprehensive Performance Testing 

("CPT'). Unlike the meeting issue, the events surrounding the CPT have nothing to do with the 

misunderstanding or miscommunication noted above. To this end, Veolia stands by its assertion 

that the Agency did indeed faiJ to honor a verbal agreement made to Veolia in the fall of 2008 

concerning the timing of the CPT testing. As we discussed, this, and the other issues set forth in 

the August 2nd Letter, continue to be points of contention between USEPA and V eolia 

Because we have always believed that these issues should be addressed-and potentially 

resolved-in a high-level meeting between Veolia and USEPA, I was pleased when you 

informed me that Regional Administrator Hedman would now be open to meeting with us. 

VES015696 
September 9, 20 13 

Pagc3 

However, despite the Regional Administrator's offer to acconunodate our request, I remain 

hopeful that we can Tesolve the issues between counsel, without the Regional Administrator's 

interveotioo. 

In sum, the August 27th Letter shed light on a miscommunication issue that had also perplexed 

us and we apologize for the misunderstanding. Moreover, we agree to send all further 

correspondence to Mr. Cohen, as suggested in your letter. (However, as we discussed, I hope 

that we can continue to conununicate directly, by telephone or otherwise, about any issues that 

arise as we work toward a solution for our clients.) 

Please let me know if you have any questions and I look forward to speaking with you again 

soon about the CPT Plan and other pend ing issues. 

V cry truly yours, 

Thompson Coburn LLP 

}--t-1~~ Joseph M. Kellmeyer 

cc: Mr. Doug Harris 

Mr. Eric Cohen 

Multi-Media Branch II 

U.S. En'lironmental Protection Agency - Region 5 

77 W. Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

cohen.eric@epa.gov 

VES015697 
VESO 15698.pdf 
Ogulel, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Hi David, 

Nancy L Paddock <nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com> 

Thursday, December OS. 2013 11:51 AM 

Ogulei, David 

Dennis J W arc hoi 

TWI boiler designation 

Dennis and I spoke this momlng about !he possibility of our boiler being an area source as opposed to a major 

source. This is a different perspective for us and we'd like to understand all aspects of this approach before making a 

decision. I will get back to you as soon as possible once we've had an opportunity to digest t hings. 

Thank you! 

Nancy L. Paddock 

Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618.271.2804 (ext·llS) 

618.271.2128 (fax) 

Nancy.Paddock<iilVeoliaES.com 

www.VeoliaES.com 

This e-mail message from Veolla EST echnlcal Solullons, LLC Is for lhe sole use of lhe Intended recipient(s) and may 

contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete it from all computers. 

VES015698 
VES015699.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent 

To: 

Subject 

Attachments; 

sarah Marshall 

Marshall, Sarah 

Monday, June 17, 2013 12:24 PM 

Downey, Shannon; Ogulei, David 

FW: tEPA 6/11/13 1etter response 

Nightingale 6-11-13 Leiter Response.pdf 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5 

Air Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Branch 

312-886-6797 

From: Qemiak. GeOO'ge 

Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:53 PM 

To: Marshall, Sarah 

Subject: FW: !EPA 6/ll/13 letter response 

From: Doug Harris [mailto:doug,harrjs@veoliaes com) 

Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:29 PM 

To: Q emiak, George 

Subject: FW: !EPA 6/11/13 letter response 

George, 

Attached below is a advanced copy of a response to Mr. Nightingale 6/11/13 letter I sent you a copy of this 

morning. Don't hesitate to call me at the numbers below if you have any questions. 

Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC 

7 Mobile Ave. 

Sauget, IL 62201 

Office 618-271-2804 Ext. 101 

Cell: 618·616-7420 

Fax: 618·271-2128 

Doug.harris@veoliaes.com 

www.veofiaes.com 

Service First. Safety Always 

This e-mai message from Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. is for the sole use of the intended recipient 

and may contain confidential and privileged Information. Any unauthorized review, use disclosure or distribution is 

prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate wilh the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 

copies of the original message and delete same from all computers. 

From: Doug Harris 

Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:25 PM 

VES015699 
To: 'Steve.Nightfngale@llllnois.gov' 

Subject: !EPA 6/11/13 letter response 

Mr. Nightingale, 

Attached is an advanced copy of a letter I sent out today responding to your 6/11/13 1etter. If you have any questions 

don't hesitate to call me at the numbers below. 

Doug Harris 

General Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC 

7 Mobile Ave. 

Sa ge~ IL 62201 

Office 618-271-2804 Ext. 101 

Cell: 618-616-7420 

Fax: 618-271-2128 

Doug.harris@veoliaes.com 

VIWW.veofiaes.com 

Service First. Safety Atways 

This e-ma~ message from Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. Is for the sole use of the Intended recipient 

and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use disclosure or distribution is 

prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all 

copies of the original message and delete same from all computers. 

VES015700