alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 18, 2010


/s/ Allen E. KahnAllen E. KahnChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Concierge Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Concierge Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### T.O., a minor, BY AND THROUGH his mother, Katrina HAYES; Katrina Hayes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Frank Till, Cumberland County Schools; Susan Williams, Cumberland County Board of Education; Judge Selina M. Brooks, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1470

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 24, 2017

Decided: August 28, 2017

*641T.O.; Katrina Hayes, Appellants Pro Se. James G. Middlebrooks, MIDDLE-BROOKS LAW PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Judith Maria Estevez, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

T.O., a minor, by and through his mother, and Katrina Hayes, appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss T.O. and Hayes’ civil action related to the minor child’s education. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *T.O. v. Cumberland Cty. Bd. of Educ.,*No. 5:16-cv-00853-FL, 2017 WL 979025 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 99.0


           REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





To Republic Bancshares, Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Republic
Bancshares, Inc. (a Florida corporation) and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998,
and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1998, and the consolidated
statement of stockholders' equity for the period ended June 30, 1998. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Republic Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented separately herein), and, in our report dated March 13, 1998, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.





                                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Tampa, Florida,
   August 13, 1998
#### O’BRIEN *v.*CITY OF DETROIT, DEPARTMENT OF STREET RAILWAYS.

Carriers — Automobiles—Contributory Negligence — Question por Jury.

Trial judge’s submission of issue of plaintiff's contributory negligence to jury *held,*not error on record presented in aetion arising from collision between plaintiff’s car and defendant carrier’s bus.

Reference for Points in Headnotk

14 Am Jur 2d, Carriers § 1190.

Appeal from Common Pleas Court of Detroit; Kent (George D.), J.

Submitted Division 1 May 14, 1968, at Detroit.

(Docket No. 3,674.)

Decided June 10, 1968.

Declaration by Gladys A. O’Brien against City of Detroit, Department of Street Railways, and Alfonso D. Zammarelli for damages for personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*Frances B. Avadenka,*for plaintiff on appeal.

*Manuel Zechman,*General Counsel and *Michael F. Peters,*for defendants.

*649Per Curiam.

The City of Detroit, Department of Street Railways, appeals a jury verdict of $2,000 in favor of Gladys A. O’Brien. An automobile driven by Mrs. O’Brien collided with a bus operated by one of defendant’s drivers at an intersection regulated by neither sign nor traffic signal. The defendant asserts the trial judge erred in submitting the issue of plaintiff’s contrihutory negligence to the jury and that he should have ruled the plaintiff con-tributorily negligent as a matter of law.

We have examined the record and have concluded that the trial judge did not err in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury. *Ingram*v. *Henry*(1964), 373 Mich 453; *Clark*v. *Naufel*(1950), 328 Mich 249, 253.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Levin, P. J., and Holbrook and Beer, JJ., concurred.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6709 

To eliminate certain requirements with respect to dredging and dredged 

material, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2023 

Mr. MOYLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To eliminate certain requirements with respect to dredging 

and dredged material, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Incentivizing the Ex5 pansion of U.S. Ports Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DREDGING; DREDGED MATERIAL. 

7 (a) DREDGING.—Section 55109(a)(3) of title 46, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘or is exempt’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

10 is exempt’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6709 IH

1 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert2 ing ‘‘, or is otherwise eligible for such a certificate 

3 and endorsement without regard to the requirement 

4 under section 12112(a)(2)’’. 

5 (b) EXCLUDING DREDGED MATERIAL FROM TRANS6 PORTATION REQUIREMENTS.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 55110 of title 46, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (A) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘OR

10 DREDGED MATERIAL’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘or dredged material’’. 

12 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis 

13 for chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, is 

14 amended by striking the item relating to section 

15 55110 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Sec. 55110. Transportation of valueless material.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Inns & Hotels
Management Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Jian Sun, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 24, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ David Jian Sun     
|Name:  |  | David Jian Sun         
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### WOLOK *v.*WOLOK.

Divorce — Appeal and Error — Record.

Judgment for divorce on defendant’s counterclaim for divorce is affirmed on appeal by defendant from certain parts of the judgment where a review of the reeord and briefs fails to persuade the Court of Appeals that the judgment should be altered in any way.

Reference for Points in Headnote

5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 868.

Appeal from Wayne, Foley (Thomas J.), J.

Submitted Division 1 June 7, 1968 at Detroit.

(Docket No. 2,897.)

Decided June 24, 1968.

Complaint by Shirlee Wolok against Charlie Wolok for divorce because of extreme and repeated cruelty. Counterclaim by defendant against plaintiff for divorce. Judgment for defendant on his counterclaim. Defendant appeals from part of the judgment.

Affirmed.

*727*Vandeveer, Doelle, Gar&ia, Tonkin & Kerr (Edmund M. Brody, Jr.,*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Louis Rosensweig,*for defendant.

Per Curiam.

A judgment of divorce was granted defendant on the ground of extreme and repeated cruelty. On appeal lie attacks the trial court’s failure to find plaintiff guilty of adultery, its award of custody of the children to plaintiff, and the alimony and property settlement provisions of the judgment.

A review of the record and briefs fails to persuade us that the judgment should be altered in any way.

Affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gillis, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BellaVista  Capital,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended  September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Michael Rider, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     Corporation.


/s/ MICHAEL RIDER

Michael Rider, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
July 20, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; URGenT: Translational Efforts to 
Advance Gene-based Therapies for Ultra-Rare Neurological and 
Neuromuscular Disorders.
    Date: March 9, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 
9529, Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d20243f28212c63202421283e2e380d232425632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb0b4afb8b1bcf3b0b4b1b8aebea89db3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 15, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03666 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Internet Capital Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-34736, 333-76870, 333-76872 and 333-12808) on Form S-8 and the registration
statement (no. 333-115702) on Form S-3 of Internet Capital Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2007, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Internet Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), comprehensive income (loss) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,
and related financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report
on Form 10-K of Internet Capital Group, Inc.

Our report dated March 16, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of Internet Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 refers to Internet
Capital Group, Inc.'s adoption of the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 16, 2007
NO. 07

- 12

- 0022

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 22 , 2012

______________________________ GRADY R. MITCHELL,

Appellant

v.

POPAT PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, A/K/A PAUL PATEL, KAMU PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY, SUNIL PATEL, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A SUPER 8 MOTEL AND ANAND, INC.,

Appellees

________________________________ FROM THE 237th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2009

- 547,914; HON. LESLIE HATCH, PRESIDING

_______________________________
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Grady R. Mitchell appeals from the trial court’s judgment that appellan t take

nothing by his suit. The clerk ’ s rec ord was filed with this Court on March 16, 2012. An

affidavit of indigence was filed by appellant on February 6, 2012. Appellees have filed a

response to the affidavit contesting Mitchell’s request to proceed w ithout the payment of

costs.2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 237th District

Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial

court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a

hearing to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so,

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record due to his indigency.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1)

execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2)

cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of f act and

conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter,

and 3) cause to be developed a reporter ’ s record transcribing the evidence and

arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the d istrict

court shall then file the supplemental records and reporter ’ s records transcribing the

hearing with the clerk of this court on or before April 23 , 2012. Should further time be

needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same m ust be req uested before

April 23 , 2012.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Trend-Following FuturesFund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”) I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill LynchAlternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  August 13, 2010

 

 
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 13, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 13, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0233. HERBERT W. BENSON et al. v. DONALD J. WARD.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2013CV428
#### Loureece CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas MCGUIRE, Sacramento County Sheriff's Deputy, # 266, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-16826

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 7, 2017* San Francisco, California

Filed July 13, 2017

Loureece Clark, Pro Se

Shanan L. Hewitt, Esquire, Attorney, Jesse Rivera *&*Associates, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Sheriffs Deputy Thomas McGuire appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity in Loureece Clark’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. We have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity. *Knox v. Sw. Airlines,*124 F.3d 1103, 1106-07 (9th Cir. 1997). We review de novo, *Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield,*439 F.3d 1065, 1059 (9th Cir. 2006), and we reverse.

The district court properly determined that McGuire had probable cause to believe that Clark had committed a crime involving the infliction of serious physical harm, and that Clark posed a serious threat of harm. *See Forrett v. Riehardson,*112 F.3d 416, 420 (9th Cir. 1997) (‘Whenever there is probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm, deadly force may be used if necessary to prevent escape, if some warning has been given, where feasible.”), *superseded by rule on other grounds as stated in Chroma Lighting v. GTE Prods. Corp.,*127 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (order).

*650The district court also determined the Fourth Amendment prohibited McGuire from using deadly force because allowing the K-9 officers and their dogs to apprehend Clark was a reasonable, non-deadly alternative. But the “Fourth Amendment does not require law enforcement officers to exhaust every alternative before using justifiable deadly force.” *Forrett,*112 F.3d at 420. Rather, the defendant’s “decision to use deadly force ‘must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight.’ ” *Id.*(quoting *Graham v. Connor,*490 U.S. 386, 396, 109 S.Ct. 1866, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989)); *see also White v. Pauly,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 548, 561, 196 L.Ed.2d 463 (2017) (emphasizing that “for a right to be clearly established, ‘existing precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate’”) (quoting *Mullenix v. Luna,*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 305, 308, 193 L.Ed.2d 255 (2015)).

Because McGuire did not violate clearly established law, we reverse the denial of qualified immunity and remand with instructions to grant summary judgment to McGuire.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Jack Tobin, Respondent, *v.*Ariel Holding Corporation et al., Appellants.

Argued June 14, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*608
      *Everett W. Bovard*for appellants.

*I. Maurice Wormser, Louis II. Schleider*and *Morris Silver*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thachepv, JJ.