alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Subsidiary Name                               |   | State or Country of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                          |   |                              |
| Taian AGS Pipeline Construction Co. Ltd       |   | China                             |
| The Pride Group (QLD) Pty Ltd                 |   | Australia                         |
| WPCS Asia Limited                             |   | China                             |
| WPCS Australia Pty Ltd                        |   | Australia                         |
| WPCS Incorporated                             |   | Pennsylvania                      |
| WPCS International – Brendale, Pty Ltd. |   | Australia                         |
| WPCS International – Brisbane, Pty Ltd. |   | Australia                         |
| WPCS International – Hartford, Inc.     |   | Connecticut                       |
| WPCS International – Lakewood, Inc.     |   | New Jersey                        |
| WPCS International – Portland, Inc.     |   | Oregon                            |
| WPCS International – Sarasota, Inc.     |   | Florida                           |
| WPCS International – Seattle, Inc.      |   | Washington                        |
| WPCS International – St. Louis, Inc.    |   | Missouri                          |
| WPCS International – Suisun City, Inc.  |   | California                        |
| WPCS International – Trenton, Inc.      |   | New Jersey                        |
|                                          |   |                              |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6739 

To modify and extend the temporary authority of the President to modify 

certain contracts and options based on the impacts of inflation, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. BACON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary authority of the President to modify certain contracts and options based on 

the impacts of inflation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Contract In5 flation Adjustment Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6739 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY 

2 AUTHORITY TO MODIFY CERTAIN CON3 TRACTS AND OPTIONS BASED ON THE IM4 PACTS OF INFLATION. 

5 Section 1 of Public Law 85–804 (50 U.S.C. 1431) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the 

8 following new sentence: ‘‘If any such amounts are so 

9 specifically provided, the Secretary may use them for 

10 such purposes.’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘December 31, 

12 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Concierge Technologies, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.  The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:





a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.








****Date: November 11, 2004
By:
/s/ Allen E. KahnAllen E. KahnChief Executive Officer




Exhibit 31Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STERLING
COMMERCE, INC. FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          83,701
<SECURITIES>                                   196,916
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               514,696
<PP&E>                                         174,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 725,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           961
<OTHER-SE>                                     495,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   725,990
<SALES>                                        151,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,438
<CGS>                                           34,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,916
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.27)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6688 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6688

To permit grant funds to be used to identify unidentified human remains 
without regard as to whether the manner of death is determined to be a 
                               homicide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2023

Mr. Reschenthaler introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit grant funds to be used to identify unidentified human remains 
without regard as to whether the manner of death is determined to be a 
                               homicide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cold Case Modernization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING GRANT UNDER JENNIFER'S LAW TO BE USED ON ANY 
              UNIDENTIFIED REMAINS.

    (a) Program Authorization.--Section 202(a)(1) of the Child Abuse 
Prevention and Enforcement Act (34 U.S.C. 40501) is amended by 
inserting after ``including migrants'' the following: ``, without 
regard to whether the manner of death is determined to be a homicide''.
    (b) Use of Funds.--Title II of the Child Abuse Prevention and 
Enforcement Act (34 U.S.C. 40501 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating the first section 205 as section 204; 
        and
            (2) in section 204(a), as redesignated, by inserting after 
        ``including migrants'' the following: ``, without regard to 
        whether the manner of death is determined to be a homicide''.

SEC. 3. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GRANTS.

    Any Department of Justice grant awarded to States and units of 
local government for forensic genetic geneaology may be used to 
identify unidentified human remains without regard to whether the 
manner of death is determined to be a homicide.
                                 <all>
```
#### John Hovey *versus*Zachariah Lovell.

In trover by an officer against a stranger, for a chattel seized on execution, the officer is *not*required to prove the seizure by a return on the execution, but he may prove it by parol evidence.

Trover for a horse. Trial before *Morton*J.

The plaintiff, a deputy sheriff, claimed the horse by virtue of a seizure on execution. He gave in evidence an attested copy of an execution issued upon a judgment in favor of one Breck against Donald Smith, and a copy of his return upon the same. By this return it appeared, that the plaintiff seized and sold divers articles in part satisfaction of the execution, but the horse was not mentioned. The plaintiff then offered to prove by parol evidence, that he seized the horse on the execution, as the property of Smith, that he put it in the custody of a keeper, informing him that he had seized it on the execution, and directing him to keep it until called for by the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff advertised it for sale on the execution in the usual manner of advertising property for sale on execution. To the admission of this evidence the defendant objected, but the objection was overruled, and the evidence admitted. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; but if the parol evidence was inadmissible, a new trial was to be granted

Metcalf, for the defendant,

said the officer ought to produce *70a return of a seizure of the horse on execution, though his return wot,ld not be conclusive evidence in his own favor. 3 Stark. Ev. 1357, 1358. In *Hammatt*v. *Wyman,*9 Mass. R. 138, it is held, that a purchaser at a sale under an execution, cannot prove the sale by parol evidence. In *Wheaton*v. *Sexton,*4 Wheat. 503, the decision was different. Where a rescue may be returned, such a return is indispensable, whether to protect the officer, or to support a prosecution against the rescuers. *Anonymous,*2 Salk. 586 ; *Anonymous,*6 Mod. 141 ; Bac. Abr. *Rescue, E*3.

*Leland*and *Gardner, contra,*

contended that the parol *e*vidence was rightly admitted, and that a return by the plaintifl would not have been evidence in his own favor. *Bean*v *Parker,*17 Mass. R. 601 ; *Adey*v. *Bridges,*2 Stark. R 189. A sheriff cannot return a rescue upon an execution *Mildmay*v. *Smith,*2 Saund. 344 ; *Waldo*v. *Lambert,*Cro Eliz. 868 ; *May*v. *Proby,*Cro. Jac. 419 ; *Anon.*6 Mod 141. And in an action for an escape upon mesne process, a plea of rescue is good, without showing a return of the rescue. *Hill*v. *Mountague,*2 Lev. 144 ; *Gorges*v. *Gore,*3 Lev. 46 ; *Anon.*6 Mod. 141. It is not necessary to return a taking on execution. *Rowland*v. *Veale,*Cowp. 20 ; Com. Dig. *Retorn, F*1 ; *Ingersoll*v. *Sawyer,*2 Pick. 279. Showing possession merely, under a claim of right, is sufficient to maintain the action against a stranger. *Graham*v. *Peat,*1 East, 244 ; 2 Wms’s Saund. 47 ; 1 Chit. Pl. 151. The plaintiff’s right of action existed before any return was or could have been made.

The *Court*

were of opinion that the evidence had been properly admitted, and the motion for a new trial was overruled.1

1

 See *Clark*v. *Foxcroft,*6 Greenleaf, 296.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Concierge Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Allen E. Kahn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and


(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

****Date: November 11, 2004
By:
/s/ Allen E. KahnAllen E. KahnChief Financial Officer

The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1Page 1 of 1
#### Goodnow v. Burrows *et al.*

Recovery of Taxes Paid by Mistake. *{Goodnow v. Wells,*67 Iowa, 651, and ¿fame u. *TAtchfield,*67 Iowa, 691, *followed,)*

*Appeal from Webster District Court.*

Filed, March 12, 1888.

*759Action in equity to recover taxes paid. Judgment for the plaintiff and defendants appeal.

*Nourse & Kaufman,*for appellants.

*Geo. Crane,*for appellee.

Seevers, C. J.

The facts in this case and the questions argued by counsel are precisely the same as in *Goodnow v. Wells,*67 Iowa, 654, and Goodnow *v. Litchfield,*67 Iowa, 691, and as we are not disposed to overrule those cases, the result is that the judgment of the district court must be

Aeeirmed.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6750 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 501 Mercer Street Southwest in Wilson, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Milton F. Fitch, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6750 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MILTON F. FITCH, SR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 501 Mercer Street Southwest in 

4 Wilson, North Carolina, shall be known and designated 

5 as the ‘‘Milton F. Fitch, Sr. Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Milton F. Fitch, Sr. 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Inns & Hotels Management Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, May Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 21, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ May Wu             
|Name:  |  | May Wu                 
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6793 

To prohibit further action on the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Energy Conservation 

Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Ceiling Fans’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. BRECHEEN (for himself, Mr. BURLISON, and Mr. GOOD of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit further action on the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Ceiling Fans’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Ceiling 

5 Fan Manufacturer Protection Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6793 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSED 

2 RULE ENTITLED ‘‘ENERGY CONSERVATION 

3 PROGRAM: ENERGY CONSERVATION FOR 

4 CEILING FANS’’. 

5 The Secretary of Energy may not take any action to 

6 finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule entitled 

7 ‘‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation 

8 Standards for Ceiling Fans’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 40932 (June 

9 22, 2023)) or any future proposed rule of a substantially 

10 similar nature. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### John CRABTREE v. ST. THOMAS ELECTRIC COMPANY and Vitraco, Inc. Vitraco, Inc., Appellant.

No. 15675.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 18, 1966.

Decided Dec. 6, 1966.

Peter P. Liebert, III, Philadelphia, Pa., Liebert, Harvey, Bechtle, Herting & Short, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, for appellant.

William H. D. Cox, Hilton Head Islands, S. C., for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued appellant for damages arising out of personal injuries to him allegedly sustained because of appellant’s *574negligence. The trial was to the Court. The latter found as a fact that at all times relevant to the case, plaintiff had been “ * * '* an employee of Continental Interiors” and that “At no time was he employed or under the direction of Vitraco.” There were the further findings that negligently piled Vitraco, Inc., crates fell and struck plaintiff “causing the back injury from which he now complains.” The Court also held as Conclusions of Law that “The plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence” and that the negligent piling of the crates was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. The trial record substantially supports those findings and conclusions of the Court. We hold that the other contentions argued on behalf of appellant are without merit.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   9,047,000
<SECURITIES>                            18,612,000
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,626,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               118,000
<INVENTORY>                                898,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        32,569,000
<PP&E>                                  11,843,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,697,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          42,495,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    7,546,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   177,000
<OTHER-SE>                              34,772,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            42,495,000
<SALES>                                 13,564,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        15,502,000
<CGS>                                   11,621,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           44,755,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (38,723,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (38,723,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           (38,723,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (2.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.74)


</TABLE>