alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,042,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  798,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                    96,613
<INVENTORY>                                    280,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,366,175
<PP&E>                                       6,784,096
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,674,948)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,212,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,955,159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,516,200
<COMMON>                                        78,979
<OTHER-SE>                                     947,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,212,836
<SALES>                                      3,056,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,056,911
<CGS>                                        2,438,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,712,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (699,798)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (699,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (699,798)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
 Data & Consulting Services  Division of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
 Two Robinson Plaza, Suite 200
Pittsburgh, PA 15205
Tel: 412-787-5403
Fax: 412-787-2906
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)
  
   Table 1.
 Table 1
 Estimated Net Reserves And Income
Certain Proved Oil And Gas Interests
John D. Oil and Gas Company
JohnD Properties  SEC Report
As Of 31 December 2010
 John DProvedProducingReservesRemaining Net ReservesOil  Mbbls
    
    
    33.344Gas  MMscf
    
    
    2,477.125Income Data (M$)Future Net Revenue
    
    
    15,520.264DeductionsOperating Expense
    
    
    8,661.124Production Taxes
    
    
    80.983Investment
    
    
    0.000Future Net Cash Flow
    
    
    6,778.158Discounted PV @ 10% (M$)
    
    
    4,002.435




---



##### 



Data & Consulting ServicesDivision of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)29 March, 2011Page 2
  RESERVES ESTIMATES
 2
  RESERVE CATEGORIES
 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X,
Rule 210.4-10 (a)
   ECONOMIC TERMS




---



##### 



Data & Consulting ServicesDivision of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)29 March, 2011Page 3
 PRICING AND ECONOMIC PARAMETERS
 Table 2
 Table 2
 Pricing and Operating Expense Assumptions
John D. Oil and Gas Company
As Of 31 December 2010
 John DBtu Factor
    
    
    1.05Gas Price Basis Adjustment, $/MMBtu
    
    
    0.5775Oil Price Basis Adjustment, $/Bbl
    
    
    0.00Transportation Charge, $/Mscf
    
    
    1.35Operating Cost, $/well/month
    
    
    523Gas Severance Tax, $/Mscf
    
    
    0.03Oil Severance Tax, $/Bbl
    
    
    0.20
 OWNERSHIP
  GENERAL




---



##### 



Data & Consulting ServicesDivision of Schlumberger Technology Corporation
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)29 March, 2011Page 4
       -s- Charles M. Boyer
    
    -s- Denise L. DelozierCharles M. Boyer II, PG
    
    Denise L. DelozierAdvisor Unconventional Reservoirs
    
    Senior Engineer
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
drugstore.com, inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert A. Barton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Robert A. BartonRobert A. Barton Chief Financial Officer




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to drugstore.com, inc. and will be retained by drugstore.com, inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



March 31, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-2271

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed March 30, 2017

Matthew M. Beck, Renee Lyn Camacho, Office of the United States Attorney, District of New Mexico, Las Cruces, NM, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Nia Rucker, Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of New Mexico, Las Cruces, NM, for Defendant-Appellant

Before KELLY, MURPHY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge

Defendant-Appellant Carlos Perez seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mr. Perez contends that the calculation of his sentencing guideline range relied on language found unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2). The district court found that Mr. Perez’s status as a career offender resulted from the application of an enumerated offense (burglary of a dwelling) in § 4B 1.2(a), not the language found wanting in Johnson. But even had that language been applied, the Supreme Court recently held that the void-for-vagueness holding in Johnson does not apply to the Sentencing Guidelines. Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 900-02, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017). Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Perez’s request for a COA and DISMISS the appeal.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael  L. Pungello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

Beauty.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Custom Nutrition Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

DS Pharmacy, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

de~luxe Distributors, Inc., a Delaware corporation

DS Distribution Canada Ltd., a British Columbia, Canada company 

Medco Online Sales, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

RAD Online Sales, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Vision Direct Inc., a Texas corporation 

Salu Beauty, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Salu Australia Pty Ltd., an Australia company

Skincarestore Australia Pty Ltd., an Australia company
#### Sussan NG and Lin Xie, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-73000

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 18, 2017

Sussan Ng, Pro Se

Lin Xie, Pro Se

Joseph Anthony O’Connell, OIL, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sussan Ng and Lin Xie, natives of China and citizens of Australia, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of *559discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ second motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred, where it was filed more than six years after the order of removal became final, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and they have not established that any statutory or regulatory exception applies, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ challenges to their underlying proceedings, the BIA’s 2007 dismissal of their appeal from an immigration judge’s finding of removability, and the BIA’s 2008 denial of their motion to reconsider and 2012 denial of their first motion to reopen, because this petition is not timely as to those orders. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

To the extent petitioners seek prosecu-torial discretion, we lack jurisdiction to consider such a request. *See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder,*688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 4, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Tao Wang      |
|-------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|              |   | Tao Wang                    |
|              |   | Principal Executive Officer |
|              |   | Qingdao Footwear, Inc. |

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6537 

To waive General Schedule qualification standards related to work experience 

for nurses at military medical treatment facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Ms. STRICKLAND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To waive General Schedule qualification standards related 

to work experience for nurses at military medical treatment facilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘REWARD Experience 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER WITH RESPECT TO EXPERIENCED NURSES 

7 AT MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILI8 TIES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The hiring manager of a military 

10 medical treatment facility or other health care facility of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6537 IH

1 the Department of Defense may waive any General Sched2 ule qualification standard related to work experience es3 tablished by the Director of the Office of Personnel Man4 agement in the case of any applicant for a nursing or prac5 tical nurse position in a medical treatment facility or other 

6 health care facility the Department of Defense who— 

7 (1)(A) is a nurse or practical nurse in the De8 partment of Defense; or 

9 (B) was a nurse or practical nurse in the De10 partment of Defense for at least 1 year; and 

11 (2) after commencing work as a nurse or prac12 tical nurse in the Department of Defense, obtained 

13 a Bachelor’s degree or graduate degree from an ac14 credited professional nursing educational program. 

15 (b) CERTIFICATION.—If, in the case of any applicant 

16 described in subsection (a), a hiring manager waives a 

17 qualification standard in accordance with such subsection, 

18 such hiring manager shall submit to the Director of the 

19 Office of Personnel Management a certification that such 

20 applicant meets all remaining General Schedule qualifica21 tion standards established by the Director of the Office 

22 of Personnel Management for the applicable position. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0001004991
<NAME>  Redwood Broadcasting, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,201
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          150,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           201
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,201
<SALES>                                        102,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,450
<CGS>                                            4,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,052,787 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            902,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   902,787)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64 
        



</TABLE>
#### Henry L. Meyer, Resp’t, v. The New York El. R. R. Co. *et al.,*App’lts.

Appeal from judgment entered upon the decision of a judge after a trial of the issues at the equity term.

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001004990 
<NAME> NCS Healthcare, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          21,207
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,701
<INVENTORY>                                     20,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,602
<PP&E>                                          34,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     247,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,060
<SALES>                                        180,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,904
<CGS>                                          135,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

PACIFIC WEBWORKS, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officers of Pacific WebWorks, Inc. certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

·

the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·

the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                          |                                                                                                                              |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  July 2, 2009 | */s/ Kenneth W. Bell*

Kenneth W. Bell

Chief Executive Officer

*/s/ R. Brett Bell*

R. Brett Bell

Chief Financial Officer |
Filed June 23, 1891.

#### Ella Tredwell, Resp’t, v. Jonas A. Lincoln, App’lt.

*Cephas Brainerd, Jr.,*for resp’t; *Frank Moss,*for app’lt*.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 24 N. Y. State Rep., 424.
Form of Stock Certificate for Common Stock



 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 



 
 ABnote North America 711 ARMSTRONG LANE COLUMBIA, TENNESSEE 38401 (931) 388-3003 HOLLY
GRONER 931-490-7660 PROOF OF APRIL 3, 2012 CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. WO-5271 FACE Operator: jkc NEW COLOR: This proof was printed from a digital file or artwork on a graphics quality, color laser printer. It is a good representation of the
color as it will appear on the final product. However, this proof process is different from offset printing. It is not an exact color rendition, and the final printed product may appear slightly different from the proof due to the difference between
the dyes and printing ink. PLEASE INITIAL THE APPROPRIATE SELECTION FOR THIS PROOF:  OK AS IS  OK WITH CHANGES  MAKE CHANGES AND SEND ANOTHER PROOF COLORS SELECTED FOR PRINTING: Intaglio prints in SC-3
Dark Green. NOTE: TEXT RECEIVED BY MODEM OR E-MAIL IS NOT PROOFREAD WORD FOR WORD. FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE OF $.01 PER SHARE, OF transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its
duly authorized officers. Dated: SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 14574X 10 4 THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE OWNER OF C INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARROLS RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN
STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) Transfer Agent and Registrar By Authorized Officer Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. Common Stock PRESIDENT TREASURER