alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael Villegas, Air Pollution Control Officer

Ventura County Air Pollution Control District

669 County Square Drive

Ventura, CA 93003-5417

Dear Mr. Villegas:

Thank you for submitting the 2009 Annual Monitoring Network Plan for the Ventura County Air

Pollution Control District. We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that it is

complete, informative, very detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual network plans as

required by our regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. While this letter serves as official

approval of the annual network plan, it does not constitute approval of the system modifications that

are proposed in the plan for the future. We will continue to work with your district to review systemchanges as they proceed.

If you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed comment, please feel free to

contact me at (415) 947-4226 or Gwen Yoshimura at (415) 947-4134.

Sinèr1’,

,i€iseph Lapka, Acting Manager

Division

Air Quality Analysis Office

cc: Keith Duval, VCAPCD

Karen Magliano, ARB

Gwen Yoshimura, EPA Region 9

Printed on Recycled Paper
discontinuation. Please coordinate with EPA Region 9 on the possible discontinuation of the El

Rio monitor, and on other future modifications. Any monitor discontinuation requests should

address criteria specified in 40 CFR 58.14(c).
<PAGE>
Exhibit 3.92

                        FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS OF

                INTEGRATED SPECIALISTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Chapter 5, Section 501, entitled "Transfer of Shares and Right of First
Refusal" is amended by deleting the same in its entirety and substituting in
lieu thereof:
"501. Transfer of Shares and Right of First Refusal.
A share in the corporation is transferable subject to a right of first refusal
in the corporation, as follows. Any shareholder intending to sell his or her
shares in the corporation shall first give the corporation written notice of
intent to sell, stating the identity of the proposed purchaser, the
consideration to be paid and the payment term or terms. Corporation shall have
forty-five (45) days from receipt of the written notice to either exercise or
decline to exercise its right of first refusal by written notice to the
shareholder. If the corporation exercises its right of first refusal, it shall
purchase and the shareholder shall sell his or her shares on the terms and
conditions set forth in the shareholder's notice of intent to sell. If the
corporation declines to exercise its right of first refusal or fails to respond
in writing within the foregoing forty-five (45) day period, then the shareholder
shall be free to sell his or her shares in the corporation, but only to the
purchaser and on the terms stated in the shareholder's notice to the corporation
of intent to sell. Written notices under this section shall be effective on
receipt by the President or Secretary of the corporation or the shareholder, as
the case may be, three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail, postage
paid, return receipt requested, addressed to the President or Secretary of the
corporation or to the shareholder at his or her record address, as the case may
be.

           [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]


                                  Page 1 of 2
<PAGE>
This Section 501 does not apply to the transaction contemplated by that certain
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as June 12, 2001 among the corporation, Team
Anesthesia, Inc. a Tennessee corporation, Team Health, Inc., a Tennessee
corporation and the corporation's shareholders that elect to become a party to
the agreement."

                            CERTIFICATE BY SECRETARY

I DO HEREBY CERTIFY AS FOLLOWS:

     That I am the duly elected, qualified and acting Secretary of Integrated
Specialists Management Services, Inc., and that the foregoing Fifth Amendment
to the Bylaws of Integrated Specialists Management Services, Inc., effective
June 12, 2001, was approved by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2001.

                                        /s/ [Signature Illegible]
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Secretary

                                  Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Willis and Overton 

Argued at Alexandria, Virginia 

BESSIE L. WEBSTER 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 1323-95-4 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 APRIL 2, 1996 

VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND 

 STAFFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF STAFFORD COUNTY 

James W. Haley, Jr., Judge 

 Robin J. Mayer (Rappahannock Legal Services, 

Inc., on brief), for appellant. 

 Lisa J. Rowley, Assistant Attorney General 

(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General; 

 D. Patrick Lacy, Jr.; Curtis G. Manchester; 

Hazel & Thomas, on brief), for appellees. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 The Virginia Employment Commission (VEC) denied Bessie L. 

Webster's request for unemployment benefits. Webster appeals the 

judgment of the circuit court affirming the commission's finding 

that Webster voluntarily left her employment without good cause. 

 Finding no error in the judgment from which she appeals, we 

affirm. 

 "When determining whether good cause existed for a claimant 

to voluntarily leave employment, the [VEC] and the reviewing 

courts must first apply an objective standard to the 

reasonableness of the employment dispute and then to the 

reasonableness of the employee's efforts to resolve that dispute 
- 2 - 

before leaving the employment." Umbarger v. Virginia Employment 

Comm'n, 12 Va. App. 431, 435, 404 S.E.2d 380, 383 (1991). 

However, the courts are governed by the statutory directive that 

"the findings of the [VEC] as to the facts, if supported by 

evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and 

the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of 

law." Code § 60.2-625(A); see Shifflett v. Virginia Employment 

Comm'n, 14 Va. App. 96, 97, 414 S.E.2d 865, 865 (1992). "The 

VEC's findings may be rejected only if, in considering the record 

as a whole, a reasonable mind would necessarily come to a 

different conclusion." Craft v. Virginia Employment Comm'n, 8 

Va. App. 607, 609, 383 S.E.2d 271, 273 (1989). 

 The record supports the VEC's determination that Webster did 

not qualify for unemployment benefits because she did not have 

good cause to leave her employment. Code § 60.2-618(1). Webster 

worked as a custodian at a Stafford County School. During the 

course of her employment, she had experienced various medical 

problems, including pain in her heel, knee, and elbow. In March 

1992 Webster saw her doctor because of continuing pain. Her 

doctor diagnosed a bone spur on her heel and tendinitis in her 

elbow, but he indicated that she could return to work the next 

day, and he did not advise her to quit. Nevertheless, Webster 

went to her principal and informed him that she could not 

continue to work because of medical reasons. 

 The circuit court affirmed the VEC's determination that 
- 3 - 

Webster left her job voluntarily without good cause because she 

demonstrated no medical reason sufficient to compel her to 

resign. We cannot say that the record as a whole necessarily 

leads us to a different conclusion than that reached by the VEC. 

 Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SURESH PACKIRISAMY,

Petitioner

v.

SENTHAMILSELVI JAYABALAN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 375 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SUPERIOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

VOLTSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2016-1204

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,365.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

SID LEACH, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, argued 

for appellant. 

JEROLD I. SCHNEIDER, Schneider Rothman IP Law 

Group, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOEL B. ROTHMAN. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 February 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### Robert Deveraux, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant. Henry B. Deveraux, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant. George W. Cothran, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellant. Mary Ann Hagan, Respondent, *v.*The Same, Appellant.

Submitted with, and the like judgment rendered as in Casey, respondent, *v.*Same, appellant (supra).
#### In the Matter of the Claims of Leo Van Beck et al., Respondents, against Allied Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Appellant, and the Claim of Harry DeBree, Respondent, *v.*Allied Pneumatic Service Company et al., Appellants, and State Insurance Fund, Respondent. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Submitted October 4, 1943;

decided October 14, 1943.

*Jeremiah F. Connor*for' motion.

*William F. O’Rourke*opposed.

*661Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. The appellants are not parties aggrieved, since no award has been made against either of them.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Depomed, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Tammy L. Cameron, Interim Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date:  August 7, 2009 |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | /s/ Tammy L.  Cameron      |
|   | Tammy L. Cameron           |
|   | Vice President,  Finance   |

 

----
#### Hester Bates *et al.,*App’lts, *v.*Wm. H. Johnston *et al.,*Resp’ts.

*James L. Bishop*and *Lewis Sanders,*for app’lts; *Morris S. Thompson,*for resp’ts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 35 N. Y. State Rep., 801.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     13181
<RECEIVABLES>                                   206110
<ALLOWANCES>                                      7055
<INVENTORY>                                     106747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                324838
<PP&E>                                          201486
<DEPRECIATION>                                   69367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  696586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           271680
<BONDS>                                         160276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           250
<OTHER-SE>                                      185110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    696586
<SALES>                                         427315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                427315
<CGS>                                           316812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   316812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (731)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2168)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 8.1**

**List of Subsidiaries**

Significant Subsidiaries: 

Home Inns & Hotels Management (Hong Kong) Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Hong Kong Ai Home Hotel Investment Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Yitel HotelManagement (Hong Kong) Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Grandmaster Property Management (Hong Kong) Limited — Incorporated inHong Kong 

He Mei Hotel Management (Shanghai) Limited — Incorporated in the PRC 

Home Inns & Hotels Management (Beijing) Limited — Incorporated in the PRC 

Home InnsHotels Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai Chuwen Investment Holding Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in thePRC 

Shanghai Top Star Hotel Management Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Yitel Hotel Management (Shanghai) Limited — Incorporated in the PRC 

Home Inns &Hotels (China) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Huichuang Hotel Management (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC

Suzhou Hengchuang Software Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Hui Ju Hotel Equipment Leasing (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Hui Yi HotelEquipment Leasing (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Jiangsu Home Inns Hotel Equipment Leasing Co., Ltd. — Incorporatedin the PRC 

Suzhou Home Trading Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

He Mei Hotel Management (Shanghai) Limited — Incorporated in the PRC 

Beijing HuidongmilindeInvestment Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai Ban Li Software Technology Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Beijing Huidongmilinde Investment Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Yijiu Daguanjia Property Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Motel 168International Holdings Limited — Incorporated in the Cayman Islands 

Merrylin Hospitality Holdings Limited — Incorporated inMauritius 

Better Wide Holdings Limited — Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands 

Motel 168 Holdings Limited — Incorporated in the Cayman Islands 

Merrylin Hotel Holdings Limited — Incorporated in Mauritius 

Motel 168 International HoldingsLimited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Merrylin Motel Holdings Limited — Incorporated in Mauritius 

Champion Merit Investments Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Glory Essence Development Limited — Incorporated in Hong Kong 

Shanghai Shenzhou MerrylinHotel Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Tianjin Jinju Hotel Management Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Hongju Hotel Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai Yiju Hotel Management Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Beijing Yuetai HotelManagement Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Merrylin Hotel Management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Meiju Hotel Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC 

Shanghai Motel Hotel Management Co., Ltd. — Incorporated in the PRC
#### Arnold R. Krakower, Appellant, *v.*Helen Krakower, Respondent.

Argued June 7, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*606
      *Charles C. Peters*for appellant.

*Henry Cohen*and *Lazarus Joseph*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lotjghran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6558 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6558

To prohibit the issuance of the rule entitled ``Upholding Civil Service 
    Protections and Merit System Principles'' or any successor rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2023

Mr. Ogles (for himself, Mr. Jackson of Texas, Mr. Cloud, Mr. Brecheen, 
Mr. Duncan, Mr. Burlison, Mr. Alford, Mr. Clyde, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Good 
of Virginia, Ms. Boebert, and Mr. Perry) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the issuance of the rule entitled ``Upholding Civil Service 
    Protections and Merit System Principles'' or any successor rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enabling Necessary Discipline with 
the Defense of Executives' Endeavors to Properly Staff Their Agencies 
with Trustworthy Employees Act'' or the ``END the DEEP STATE Act''.

SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSED RULE.

    The Director of the Office of Personnel Management--
            (1) shall withdraw the proposed rule titled ``Upholding 
        Civil Service Protections and Merit System Principles'' (88 
        Federal Register 63862 (September 18, 2023)); and
            (2) may not take any action to finalize, implement, or 
        enforce the proposed rule described in paragraph (1) or any 
        substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 13.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**          In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan Amadori, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.                  June 23, 2006 /s/ Dan Amadori*   Dan Amadori   Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SCB Computer Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Boling, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of
the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

September 11, 2003

By:        /s/  Michael J. Boling
    -----------------------------------------
             Michael J. Boling
         Executive Vice President,
   Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Louis Morelli, Appellant.

Submitted October 4, 1943;

decided October 14, 1943.

*Louis Morelli,*in person, for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion denied. Under the provisions of the Constitution no appeal lies as of right and no leave to appeal can be granted by the court.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Natural Gas Services  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Earl R. Wait, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                          /s/Earl R Wait
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Earl R. Wait
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                                         March 29, 2005