alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert E. GREEN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; Baltimore City Police Department; SOD Decoy Squad; Carl Stambaugh, Officer; Other Members of the Baltimore Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1176

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: July 6, 2017

Robert E. Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

*728Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Green, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice and confirming that the case was closed. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket on October 28, 1999 and November 10, 1999. The notice of appeal was filed on February 6, 2017. Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Green’s motion to expedite as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6628 

To provide direct hire authority to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. 

BUCSHON, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, 

Mr. TRONE, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. ARMSTRONG, 

Mr. CISCOMANI, and Ms. VAN DUYNE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 

to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide direct hire authority to the Director of the 

Bureau of Prisons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘BOP Direct-Hire Au5 thority Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6628 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY FOR BUREAU OF PRIS2 ONS. 

3 (a) DIRECT HIRE AUTHORITY.—The Director of the 

4 Bureau of Prisons may appoint, without regard to the pro5 visions of subchapter I of chapter 33 (other than sections 

6 3303 and 3328 of such chapter), qualified candidates to 

7 any positions in the competitive service at Bureau of Pris8 ons facilities. 

9 (b) SUNSET.—The authority under subsection (a) 

10 shall expire on the date that 96 percent of the total num11 ber (as of the date of enactment of this Act) of competitive 

12 service positions at all such facilities are occupied. 

Æ
Form of Secured Promissory Note



 Exhibit 4.8 
 FORM OF 
 SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 

 

			
	$5,000,000	  	Dated: April 19, 2012

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, HYPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
(“Borrower”), HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY to              (“Lender”) the principal amount of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) or such lesser amount as
shall equal the outstanding principal balance of the Term Loan made to Borrower by Lender, plus interest on the aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Term Loan, at the rates and in accordance with the terms of the Loan and Security Agreement by
and between Borrower and Silicon Valley Bank, as Collateral Agent, and the Lenders (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”). If not sooner paid, the entire principal amount and all
accrued interest hereunder and under the Loan Agreement shall be due and payable on Term Loan Maturity Date as set forth in the Loan Agreement 
 Principal, interest and all other amounts due with respect to the Term Loan, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America to Lender as set forth in the Loan Agreement. The principal amount
of this Note and the interest rate applicable thereto, and all payments made with respect thereto, shall be recorded by Lender and, prior to any transfer hereof, endorsed on the grid attached hereto which is part of this Note. 

This Note is one of the Notes referred to in, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of
April 19, 2012, to which Borrower and Lender are parties (the “Loan Agreement”). The Loan Agreement, among other things, (a) provides for the making of this secured Term Loan to Borrower, and (b) contains provisions
for acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain stated events. 
 This Note may not be prepaid except as
provided in the Loan Agreement. This Note and the obligation of Borrower to repay the unpaid principal amount of the Term Loan, interest on the Term Loan and all other amounts due Lenders under the Loan Agreement is secured under the Loan Agreement.

 Presentment for payment, demand, notice of protest and all other demands and notices of any kind in connection with the
execution, delivery, performance and enforcement of this Note are hereby waived. 
 Borrower shall pay all reasonable and
documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable and documented out-of-pocket attorneys’ fees and costs, incurred by Lenders in the enforcement or attempt to enforce any of Borrower’s obligations
hereunder not performed when due. This Note shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. 
 [Remainder of page left intentionally blank; signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Note to be duly executed by one of its officers
thereunto duly authorized on the date hereof. 
  

			
	HYPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		
	Name:	 	 
		
	Title:
#### TIFAGA of Nua, Plaintiff v. VAIMILI of Nua, Defendant

No. 13-1933

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Matai Name: “Toomaata” of Nua]

June 16, 1936

H. P. WOOD, *Chief Justice;*LIUFAU, *District Judge;*and PELE, *District Judge*

DECISION

The matai name case Toomaata having come on to be heard by the High Court at the Courthouse in Fagatogo on the 16th day of June 1936 before the following judges:

*Chief Justice*H. P. WOOD, *District Judge*LIUFAU, *District Judge*PELE.

And the proponent of the matai name, Vaimili, having appeared in person and by Ilaoa and his counsel and the objector, Tifaga, having appeared in person and by Atofau his counsel, and the evidence produced by the parties and their witnesses having established the following facts:

1. That Vaimili is a resident of the Village of Nua, the home of the Toomaata and is a retired Fita Fita.

That Tifaga whose home is in Nua resides at Alao and is an ordained L. D. S. Missionary.

2. That Vaimili is the grandson of Toomaata Faautagia who was the father of Vaimili’s father.

That Tifaga is a great great grandson of Toomaata Taaope from whom he descends through his mother *529Faitele who was the daughter of Sa and Saline. That Saline was the daughter of Pae’e and Ganu and that Pae’e was the son of Taaope Toomaata.

3. That the holders of the name Toomaata as testified to by the proponent and his witness do not include Toomaata Taaope and that the holders of the name Toomaata as testified to by the objector and his witnesses did not include Toomaata Faautagia.

Accordingly IT IS ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the matai name Toomaata be given to the proponent and be registered in the name of Vaimili of Nua on the following grounds:—

1. That Vaimili by the uncontradicted testimony has a better hereditary right to the name than Tifaga, as being the grandson of a Toomaata by the male line, while Tifaga is a great great grandson of a Toomaata by the female line.

2. That Vaimili as a retired Fita Fita living in Nua will be able not only to give the family as matai his undivided attention but will not be dependent on the family for his living, while Tifaga being an ordained missionary has many duties outside of his family affairs and by the nature of his calling must live where his missionary duties call him.

JUDGMENT FOR VAIMILI. The matai name Toomaata to be registered in Vaimili’s name. The Court costs of $25.00 to be paid by Tifaga.
#### Anthony WHITEHURST; Anthony Whitehurst, ON BEHALF OF his Minor child M.W., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Thomas L. COUGILL; Charles T. Miers; Richard Simses; Jon C. Vicklund; James L. Ray; Kyle D. Giacco; William T. Green, III; Willingham, Fultz & Cougill, L.L.P.; Winstead, P.C.; Daw and Ray, L.L.P.; William T. Green, P.C.; Bill Burke, Defendants-Appellees

Summary Calendar No. 17-20302

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 6, 2017

Anthony Whitehurst, Baytown, TX, pro se.

Kyle Douglas Giacco, Esq., Daw & Ray, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Demetri Anastasiad-is, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, Murray Jules Fogler, Esq., William Tate Green, III, for Defendants-Appellees.

Thomas L. Cougill, Houston, TX, pro se.

William T. Green, III, Houston, TX, pro se.

*343Kyle D. Giacco, pro se.

Before REAVLEY, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having read all of Appellant’s brief and also the complaint that was filed to initiate the lawsuit. There is no legal claim of error that would give this court jurisdiction to change the judgment of the district court. Appellant has written well about historical problems and even about courts’ jurisdiction, but he fails to allege any legal right of his that has been violated or personal injury suffered as a consequence, This court must affirm the judgment appealed.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6565 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6565

    To establish a system to expedite gate passes and flight access 
  procedures to allow caregivers, parents, and guardians to accompany 
       minors and passengers needing assistance to their flights.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2023

  Mr. Steube introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish a system to expedite gate passes and flight access 
  procedures to allow caregivers, parents, and guardians to accompany 
       minors and passengers needing assistance to their flights.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fast Lane for Youths Act'' or the 
``FLY Act''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF SYSTEM TO EXPEDITE GATE PASSES AND FLIGHT 
              ACCESS PROCEDURES TO ALLOW CAREGIVERS, PARENTS, AND 
              GUARDIANS TO ACCOMPANY MINORS AND PASSENGERS NEEDING 
              ASSISTANCE TO THEIR FLIGHTS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and the 
Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) shall 
collaborate to establish a system to better expedite gate passes and 
flight access procedures to allow caregivers, parents, and guardians to 
accompany minors and passengers needing assistance to their flights. 
Such system shall ensure up to two such gate passes are provided to 
such caregivers, parents, and guardians who already qualify for TSA 
Pre-Check, and such gate passes note such status in the same manner and 
to the same extent as such status would be noted on a ticket issued to 
such caregivers, parents, and guardians.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                             157,365
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,227,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (272,493)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,635,212
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,300,105
<PP&E>                                           3,468,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,513,207)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,176,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,878,987
<BONDS>                                            890,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            46,938
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,981,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,176,248
<SALES>                                         22,140,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,140,214
<CGS>                                           17,610,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,610,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,064,621
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    55,999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204,587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,414,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                       444,456
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                970,469
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       970,469
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .21
                                             
                                     

</TABLE>
a.1



    body {
      color:#000000;
      background-color:#FFFFFF;
    }
    a  { color:#0000FF; }
    a:visited { color:#800080; }
    a:hover { color:#008000; }
    a:active { color:#FF0000; }
    -->

  
  

PYROTEC, INC. 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION

125-E Wappoo Creek Drive

Suite 202A

Charleston, South Carolina 29412 

1-800-PYROTEC

www.pyrotecus.com


May 15, 2012



Jon Dyer

30 Pinnacle Dr.

Rogers, AR 72758


	RE:	ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Dear Mr. Dyer: 


	We are hereby inviting you to serve on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of PyroTec, Inc., a publicly traded entity incorporated in Delaware ("PyroTec").  Your acceptance of this invitation will be confirmed through execution of this correspondence below, and your execution of the enclosed Advisory Board Consulting and Compensation Agreement dated May 1, 2012 (the "Advisor Agreement").

	By executing this correspondence, and the Advisor Agreement, you are agreeing to comply with the duties of such an appointment under all applicable common laws, statutory laws, and rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  Furthermore, you are agreeing to perform your advisory services consistent with the enclosed Bylaws of PyroTec.

	I am looking forward to a productive and long-term relationship.  Please feel free to contact our corporate counsel, Anthony R. Paesano at apaesano@paesanoakkashian.com or (248) 792-6886 with any questions.


Very truly yours,


/s/ John Burns


John Burns

Chief Executive Officer


Agreed:


/s/ Jon Dyer		

Jon Dyer


Enclosures

cc:	Anthony R. Paesano

	Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory C. Talbott, the Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2008 (the Report) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o (d)) and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Gregory C. Talbott                                                                        
|                      |  | Gregory C. Talbott                                                                            
|                      |  | Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
RFG Acquisition I Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W. Matre, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      David W. MatreDavid
      W. MatrePrincipal
      Financial OfficerMarch
      6, 2009
[exhibit998002.gif]


| |                                                                                             |                                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street
Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3
Canada | Telephone
(604) 691-3000
Fax
(604) 691-3031
Internet
www.kpmg.ca

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   The Board of Directors Asanko Gold Inc. We consent to the use of our reports, each dated March 16, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F. //s// KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants  March 16, 2015 Vancouver, Canada   KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative 
(KPMG International), a Swiss entity. 
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.