alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Power of the Dream Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ildiko Rozsa, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 19, 2014





| | /s/ Ildiko Rozsa                | 
| | ------------------------------- | 
| | Ildiko Rozsa                    | 
| | Title:  Chief Financial Officer | 





This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Antonio MURILLO-CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41506 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

*147Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Antonio Murillo-Camacho, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Antonio Murillo-Camacho has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Murillo-Camacho has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of New York Telephone Company, Appellant. William F. Canough, as Commissioner of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, Respondent. (2 Proceedings — 1941 and 1940 Assessments.)

Argued March 4, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*539
      *Edward L. Blackman, George R. Fearon*and *Frank A. Fritz*for appellant.

*541
      *James C. Tormey, Corporation Counsel (Edward Garfield*of counsel), for respondent.

*543
      *Thomas D. Thacher, Corporation Counsel (Arthur A. Segall, Robert H. Wrubel*and *Edward Garfield*of counsel), for City of New York, *amicus curiae,*in support of respondent’s position.

*Andrew P. Ronan, Corporation Counsel (Herbert A. Hickman*of counsel), for City of Buffalo, *amicus curiae,*in support of respondent’s position.

*544
      *Per Curiam.*

The orders should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of *Matter of New York Telephone Co.*v. *Ferris*(257 App. Div. 415, 282 N. Y. 667).

There is no conflict between the *Ferris*case and *People ex rel. New York Edison Co.*v. *Feitner*(99 App. Div. 274, 181 N. Y. 549). The Tax Law has long defined *“*real property ” as including “ All mains, pipes and tanks laid or placed in, upon, above or under any public or private street or place for conducting steam, heat, water, oil, electricity * * *.” (§ 2, subd. 6). This provision was held by the *Feitner*case not to include equipment which the Edison Company had placed in private premises of its customers for the purpose of connecting the premises with the company’s feed mains in the street. The decision was that such equipment was not *“*laid or placed in, upon, above or under any public or private street or place.” The word “ place,” as so used, was taken by the court to signify a short thoroughfare or square.

The orders should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., taking no part.

Orders affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**WPCS
      INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED**


**FORM
      10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I
      am the
      Chief Financial Officer of WPCS International Incorporated, a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection
      with
      the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2007 and filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July
                30, 2007
            
            /s/ JOSEPH
                HEATER
              Joseph
                  Heater
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
# Static vs. Total Efficiency

Why we insist on using both:

– So that the metric is correlated to the energy

consumed

– To encourage the right behavior and obtain the right results (energy savings)

# Misconceptions

1. Fan static pressure and efficiency are

calculated from total pressure and efficiency (NODA

- “static efficiency is, by definition, calculated using total pressure”)

2. If we don’t use total efficiency, we will be ignoring the energy that goes into accelerating the air.

# Arguments

1. Velocity pressure is not “useful energy” for fans without outlet ducts (Mathson)

2. Using total efficiency for fans without outlet ducts gives an advantage to smaller fans that consume more energy (Smith)

3. Fan customers are not willing to pay for velocity pressure that is wasted at the discharge at a non

ducted fan (Stevens)

4. Europeans get it and have it in their regulation (no one would argue that they have a dual metric, but a single metric applied to 2 different fan types)

# Assumptions

How Tested

Non

- Ducted DuctedHow AppliedNon-Ducted Good correlation (metric represents

power consumed) DW (blow through) Utility fans (some on roof) Other specific applicationsDucted This situation

does not exist. Good correlation (metric represents

power consumed)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AmericanWagering, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I certify as of thedate hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 ofthe United States Code, to my knowledge, that:

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the datesand for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” withthe Securities and Exchange Commission.
| Date: September 19, 2007 |   | /s/ Victor J. Salerno                                                                                                   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Victor J. Salerno  President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating  Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|                     |   |                                                                                                                    |
|                     |   |                                                                                                                    |
|                     |   | /s/ Melody J. Sullivan                                                                                                  |
|                     |   | Melody J. Sullivan  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                                                               |

 

----
1242265-R 8 SDM S

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y REGIO N 8 X<^ar ^ : | 159 5 V(/ynkoo p Stree t DENVER , C O 80202-112 9 ' Phon e 800-227-891 7 http:/Awww.epa.gov/region0 8 Februar) ' 17 , 201 0 Ref : 8EPR-S R Lev i Tod d Pacifi c Wester

n Technologies , LTD . 1104 9 W . 44' " Ave . Suit

e 20 0 Whea t Ridge , Colorado . 8003 3 Dea r Levi , • I'Hi s lette r i s writte n t o infor myo u tha t Regio n 8 EP A accept

s you r Fina l Remedia l Actio n Repor t fo r th e Arkansa s Valley Smelte

r an dColorad o Zin c Lea

dMil l portio

n o f Operabl e Uni t 5 o f th e Califomi aGulch Superfiin dsit e i n Leadville , Colorado . Th e lette r serves a s notification dia

t al l wor k i s complet

e an dacceptabl

e o n thi s project, Wor

k Assignmen

t No. : 009-RARA-0829 . Jta n Christensen , Remedia l Projec t Manage r



# ®Printed on Recycled

Paper
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Camille Diane ARMSTRONG, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 17-40018 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 17, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. ’ Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, ' Kayla R. Gassmann, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Of*807fice, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Camille Armstrong appeals her conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. She asserts that the factual basis for her guilty plea was inadequate because the government failed to meet its obligation to prove that she had knowledge of the quantity of actual methamphetamine involved in her offense.

As Armstrong concedes, her argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Betancourt,*586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that *Flores-Figueroa v. United States,*556 U.S. 646, 129 S.Ct. 1886, 173 L.Ed.2d 853 (2009), did not overturn *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the government is not required to prove knowledge of drug type and quantity as an element of a § 841 drug offense. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court' has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 35.3
                          SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
                           RALI SERIES 2006-QA9 TRUST

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### Fob JAMES, as Governor, and on Behalf of the STATE OF ALABAMA, and its citizens; Alabama Medical Services Administration; and Rebecca B. Beasley, Commissioner, Medical Assistance, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard S. SCHWEIKER, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Leonard D. Schaeffer, Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration; Virginia M. Smyth, Regional Administrator, Region IV, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 80-7990

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit B

July 13, 1981.

Ira DeMent, Sp. Counsel, Montgomery, Ala., for F. James.

Herman H. Hamilton, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Shepard D. Ashley, Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Elizabeth N. Petree, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for Alabama Medical Services Administration.

Kenneth E. Vines, Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., F. Richard Waitsman, Asst. Reg. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.

Before TJOFLAT, VANCE and THOMAS A. CLA’UI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed on the basis of the Memorandum Opinion of the district court, *James v. Harris,*499 F.Supp. 594 (M.D.Ala.1980).

AFFIRMED.
#### Hartol Products Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to provide that judgment is directed for the plaintiff for $50,000 with interest from February 1, 1936, together with costs .to appellant in all courts. (See 290 N. Y. 44.)
# Službeni list C 11A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CA2014.011.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 11A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 5715. siječnja 2014. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CA2014.011.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 11A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

5715. siječnja 2014.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2014/C 011A/01 | Ispravak oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto izvršnog direktora Europske agencije za željeznice (ERA) u Francuskoj (privremeno osoblje — razred AD 14) — COM/2014/10345 (SL C 6 A, 10.1.2014.) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2014/C 011A/01

Ispravak oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto izvršnog direktora Europske agencije za željeznice (ERA) u Francuskoj (privremeno osoblje — razred AD 14) — COM/2014/10345 (SL C 6 A, 10.1.2014.)

(SL C 6 A, 10.1.2014.)

1

PREGLED NATJEČAJA SL C A

Dolje je naveden popis SL C A objavljenih u tekućoj godini.

Ako nije drugačije navedeno, SL je objavljen na svim jezičnim inačicama.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |

5

6

11

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 15.1.2014 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 11/1

---

Ispravak oglasa za slobodno radno mjesto izvršnog direktora Europske agencije za željeznice (ERA) u Francuskoj

(privremeno osoblje — razred AD 14)

COM/2014/10345

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 6 A od 10. siječnja 2014.
  )

(2014/C 11 A/01)

Stranica 4., pod naslovom „Postupak prijave”, poveznica u trećem odlomku glasi:

„https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/”.

---
#### Grayr POGOSYAN, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent

2017-1734

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 16, 2017

Thomas Tierney, Norwalk, CT, argued for petitioner.

Isaac B. Rosenberg, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by Chad A. Readler, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Claudia Burke; Peter D. Gregory, Office of the Chief Counsel, Commercial & Administrative Law Division, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Washington, DC.

(Prost, Chief Judge, O’Malley and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6728 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6728

 To require public school, and public institution of higher education, 
   athletic teams and clubs to be designated for membership based on 
                biological sex, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2023

  Mrs. McClain (for herself, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Higgins of 
 Louisiana, Mr. Burchett, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Sessions, Mrs. 
Luna, Mr. Fry, Ms. Mace, and Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require public school, and public institution of higher education, 
   athletic teams and clubs to be designated for membership based on 
                biological sex, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Women's Sports Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED DESIGNATION OF SCHOOL ATHLETIC TEAMS.

    (a) Types of Designations.--An intercollegiate, intramural, or club 
athletic team or sport that is sponsored by a public school, or a 
public institution of higher education, or that is a competing team or 
sport sponsored by a non-public school or institution, and that 
receives Federal financial assistance, shall be expressly designated 
as, and composed of students of, only 1 of the following categories of 
team or club members based on biological sex at birth:
            (1) Males.
            (2) Females.
            (3) Coed members described in paragraphs (1) and (2).
    (b) Requirement.--The membership of athletic teams or sports 
designated only for females shall only be open to biological females at 
birth.

SEC. 3. PENALTY.

    All Federal financial assistance shall be terminated for a failure 
to comply with section 2.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Bryan HALL, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51068 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for ‘ Plaintiff-Appellee

James Bryan Hall, Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James Bryan Hall has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hall has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Frank Bailey et al., Appellants, for an Order, Pursuant to Section 61-a of the General Corporation Law, Assessing upon Bush Terminal Company, Respondent, the Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorneys’ Fees Incurred by Petitioners in Connection with an Action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, Entitled: *“*C. Walter Randall, as Trustee, Plaintiff, *v.*Frank Bailey et al., Defendants,” and awarding such expenses as special costs recoverable as statutory costs. In the Matter of the Application of Title Guarantee and Trust Company, as Ancillary Executor of Edward T. Bedford, Deceased, Appellant, for an Order, Pursuant to Section 61-a of the General Corporation Law, Assessing upon Bush Terminal Company, Respondent, the Reasonable Expenses, Including Attorneys’ Fees Incurred by Petitioner in Connection with an Action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, Entitled: *“*C. Walter Randall, as Trustee, Plaintiff, *v.*Frank Bailey et al., Defendants,” and awarding such expenses as special costs recoverable as statutory costs.

Argued June 10, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*537
      *Spencer Pinkham, Henry F. Holthusen*and *Lawrence S. Pratt*for appellants in first above-entitled proceeding.

*David Paine, George Koegler*and *Francis D. Kalosky*for appellants in second above-entitled proceeding.

*Frederick E. Crane, Arthur Garfield Hayes, John Schulman-*and *Morris Shilensky*for respondent.

Orders affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the final judgment within the meaning of the statute had been entered before the date when the statute went into effect. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ. Taking no part: Lewis, J.