alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.01 SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
(in thousands) Balance at Beginning of
    
    
    Charged to Costs and
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Write-offs Net of
    
    
    Balance at End ofYear
    
    
    Expenses
    
    
    Other
    
    
    Recoveries
    
    
    YearAllowance for
Doubtful Accounts2004
    
    $
    5,377
    
    
    $
    340
    
    
    $
    367
    (3)
    
    $
    4,685
    
    
    $
    1,3992003
    
    
    10,698
    
    
    
    2,248
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    7,569
    
    
    
    5,3772002
    
    
    24,225
    
    
    
    5,115
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18,642
    
    
    
    10,698Valuation Allowance for
Deferred Tax Assets2004
    
    $
    422,303
    
    
    $
    (43,112
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    379,1912003
    
    
    348,793
    
    
    
    73,510
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    422,3032002
    
    
    323,619
    
    
    
    (28,137
    )
    
    
    53,311
    (1)(2)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    348,793
   (1)
    
    Balances acquired from acquisitions.(2)
    
    Balances will be credited to equity upon reduction of valuation allowances.(3)
    
    Charges to Discontinued Operations in 2004 13
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11557-11558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04833]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9025-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 02/22/2016 Through 02/26/2016,
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20160047, Final Supplement, NNSA, TN, Production of Tritium in 
a Commercial Light Water Reactor, Review Period Ends: 04/04/2016, 
Contact: Curtis Chambellan 505-845-5073.
EIS No. 20160048, Final, USAF, AK, United States Air Force F-35A 
Operational Beddown-Pacific, Review Period Ends: 04/04/2016, Contact: 
Toni Ristau 907-377-2116.
EIS No. 20160049, Final, DOE, NM, Disposal of Greater-than-Class-C 
(GTCC) Low-Level Radioactive Waste and GTCC-Like Waste, Review Period 
Ends: 04/04/2016, Contact: Theresa J. Kliczewski 202-586-3301.
EIS No. 20160050, Final, USFS, CA, Jess Project, Review Period Ends: 
04/04/2016, Contact: Danika Carlson 530-468-1225.
EIS No. 20160051, Draft, DOC, PRO, Programmatic--Nationwide Public 
Safety Broadband Network for the Non-Contiguous United States, Comment 
Period Ends: 05/03/2016, Contact: Amanda Pereira 571-665-6141.
EIS No. 20160052, Final, USACE, CA, Cordova Hills, Review Period Ends: 
04/04/2016, Contact: Lisa M. Gibson 916-557-5288.
EIS No. 20160053, Final Supplement, TVA, TN, Adoption--Production of 
Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor, Contact: Charles P. 
Nicholson 865-632-3582. The Tennessee Valley Authority is adopting the 
U.S.

[[Page 11558]]

Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration's FSEIS 
#20160047, filed with EPA on 02/24/2016. TVA is a cooperating agency 
for the project. Therefore, recirculation of the document is not 
necessary under Section 1306.3(c) of the CEQ Regulations.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20150343, Draft, NPS, AZ, Backcountry Management Plan Grand 
Canyon National Park, Comment Period Ends: 04/04/2016, Contact: Rachel 
Bennett 928-638-7326. Revision to FR Notice Published 12/11/2015; 
Extending Comment Period from 03/04/2016 to 04/04/2016.
EIS No. 20160028, Final, FHWA, WI, I-94 East-West Corridor (70th St-
16th St), Review Period Ends: 04/15/2016, Contact: Michael Davies 608-
829-7500. Revision to FR Notice Published 02/12/2016; Extending Comment 
Period from 03/14/2016 to 04/15/2016.

    Dated: March 1, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-04833 Filed 3-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen Biologics, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and15d — 15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 10, 2005         By:                        /s/ GERALD E. BISBEE, JR.    Name:  Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.    Title:  *President and Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Authority.



/s/    LEO M.
CHUPASKALeo M. Chupaska Chief Financial Officer Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority May 19, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Malcolm Skolnick,
President and Chief Executive Officer certify that:  1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CytoGenix, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;  4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;  5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls; and     6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date:  April 4,
2008  /s/ Malcolm
Skolnick Malcolm
SkolnickPresident & CEO
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1090 CAF 14-00216**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ANNA H. MORGAN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES W. PETERSON, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

--------------------------------------------- IN THE MATTER OF JAMES W. PETERSON, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V
ANNA H. MORGAN, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
PAUL A. NORTON, CLINTON, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENTRESPONDENT.
PAUL SKAVINA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROME.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Julia M. Brouillette, R.), entered December 19, 2013 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded Anna H. Morgan sole legal custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: On appeal from an order of custody and visitation entered following a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, respondent-petitioner father contends that Family Court erred in vacating a prior order of custody and visitation entered upon the consent of the parties and in conducting a de novo hearing. We reject that contention. It is well established that a court retains inherent authority to vacate its own order in the interest of justice, even when entered on consent ( see Matter of Chomik v Sypniak , 70 AD3d 1336, 1336-1337). “Indeed, the court’s power to [vacate an order in the interest of justice] is inherent and ‘does not depend upon any statute’ ” ( Ruben v American & Foreign Ins. Co. , 185 AD2d 63, 67; see Matter of Delfin A. , 123 AD2d 318, 320). Here, petitioner-respondent mother had the right to the assistance of counsel in this custody proceeding ( see § 262 [a] [v]; Matter of Kristin R.H. v Robert E.H. ,**-2- 1090 CAF 14-00216**  48 AD3d 1278, 1279), and the conceded failure on the part of the court to advise her of that right was a sufficient basis for vacating the resulting order in the interest of justice ( see generally Delfin A. , 123 AD2d at 319-320).

Entered: October 9, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Helen RAMSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY; Karen J. Glascock; Carol F. Ordess, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1495

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 24, 2017

Decided: August 28, 2017

Helen Ramsey, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Durrum Wingfield, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helen Ramsey appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing her fraud claim as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ramsey v. Branch Banking & Tr. Co.,*No. 3:15-cv-00165-MHL, 2017 WL 1086761 (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
# Maryland Department of the Environment

WATE R About M DE P erm i ts E n forcement/Co m pli an ce

Progra ms

C a l end ar Grants and Loans Sign up fo r eMDE



# MDE HOME MARYLANDER BUSINESS RESEARCH CENTER

A I R LAND

Jobs 

# .~--- - 

# --. .. .,.. . u 

# ; l " 

# .~~ Marcel/us Shale Safe Drilling Initiat

ive l ooks at whether an d h ow g as drill i ng and product i on ca n b e done safe l y


# MD STAT MDESta t Data co l lection, evaluat i on a nd accoun tabili ty workqroup



# http: //www. mde . state . md.uslPages/Home.aspx Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

### Implementation Plan I I WIP - - Our act i on plan to restore & protect the Bay 

### and i ts trib u tar i es

Lead Poisoning 

### Prevention Working toward our goal of no ch i ldren with l ead po i son i ng 

# Page 1 of 2

P ro b lem Solve r I M a ryland
. gov I Online Services I S tate Agencies Phone Directory Search

ema il frI e nd p rint p a~ NEWSROOM



### Action on Climate Change 2011 Greenhouse Gas E m i ss i ons Reduction Act Draft P l an



# " , 

# '\
. ' 

# , "



## - " 'Ii HDE Outreach, Education and Events Together we can al l make a d i fference - leam mo re about MDE outreach and how you can he l p 

### Governor Martrn 0 Malley Lt (lO\,lI'noc Anll'looy G Blown 

# ~

NI.'1t(tri a Prf)h/~·nt f:
.. me-r;;l"",it·\; 866. ~IDJ:: (,"070 

# No tices & A lerts 1 1 0 Ozone Author i ty SIP Emergency T i da l Wetlands L i cense and Penm i t Infonmat i on & Nont i dal Wetland and Waterway Gu i dance /'
\ Publ i c Hear i ng on the Lead 

# .J Infrastructure SIP Rev i sion R evised industr i al stormwater permit proposed Updated: New l ocations for Disposa l of Unwante d R adioactive Materia l Air Q u al i ty Fo recast F i sh Con s u m ption Adv i sory Shellf ish Harvest i ng Adv i so ry & M aps More> 

# N ews

*" 'Med i a Adv i sory*'" Maryland First Lady Katie O'Malley to Present "Rethink Recycling" Sculpture Contest Awards Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown Addresses MDE's 2nd Ann u a l Clean Water Innovations Trade Show, Recognizes Innovat i ve Storm water Project MDE Secretary Summers ce l ebrates t he 40th ann i versary of t h e C l ean Water Act w i th Par kway E l e m enta ry students Lead Po i son i ng cases Drop Overal l , R i se i n Propert i es Not Prev i ously Covered by Md, Law Waterways i n St. Ma ry's, Calvert Count i es Rec l ass i fie d for She l lfish Harvesting More> 

### Featured Clips F rederick News - Post : Md. Sec. of the Env i ronment vis i ts Pa r kway E l ementary to celebrate Clean Water Act ann i versary aa i to. Sun: Survey shows fewer Md
. ch il d ren suffered l ead po i soning in 2011 Nat i onal Academy 

### eX Sc i ence : C li mate Change: L i nes of E v i dence Balt i more Sun ed i tor i al: Impact of d i rty a i r must be taken into account



# 11 1 14

/ 2 01 2
f10k2011a1ex10xxxx_yida.htm



Exhibit 10.40




 


[English Summary]







Fujian Jiaoguang Media Co. Loan Agreement







Borrower/Party A: Fujian Jiaoguang Media Co.


Lender/Party B: Fujian Haixia Bank, Fuzhou Jinshan Branch







Type of loan: Short-term cash flow loan







Amount of loan: RMB 6 million







Purpose of loan: Payment of copyright







Loan period: 1 year, starts from Nov. 4, 2011 to Nov. 4, 2012







Interest: 9.184% per annum







Repayment schedule: Borrower agrees to make lump sum payments on Nov. 4, 2012.







Guaranty: guaranteed by Fujian Jintai Tourism Development Co., Ltd







Jurisdiction:


Laws of China







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, either party can resolve the dispute by the courts of Fuzhou City.







Date of the Agreement:


Nov. 7, 2011


 


1
----

**Exhibit 23.8**

**[LOGO OF ORE RESERVES ENGINEERING]**

**LETTER OF CONSENT**

**TO:**    Lundin Mining Corporation 

I refer to the Annual Report on Form 40-F ofLundin Mining Corporation dated March 31, 2008 (including all exhibits, the"Annual Report").

I hereby consent to the use of my report and theappearance of my name in the Annual Report.

| Yours very truly,                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
| /s/ Alan C. Noble                                      |   |
| Alan C. Noble, P.E.                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
| Dated:   March 31, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |

----
#### Mason *et al. v.*Nour.

No. 13019.

March 29, 1940.

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

1. “In an action for recovery of land the description of the property must be sufficiently definite to enable the sheriff, in the event the plaintiff recovers, to execute a writ of possession from the description given.” Ha*mil*v. *Gormley,*188 *Ga.*585 (4 S. E. 2d, 471), and cit. See *Crider*v. *Woodward,*162 *Ga.*743, 752 (135 S. E. 95). In the instant case the petition with the plat attached thereto as exhibit A, construed most strongly against the plaintiff, as it must be on demurrer, failed to describe the property in such .manner as would enable the sheriff, in the event of a recovery by the plaintiff, to execute a writ of possession.

2. Since, under the ruling above, the suit must fail as an action for land as referred to in exhibit A, it can not be maintained- as an equitable action for the sole purpose of settling disputed land lines of another tract as referred to in exhibit 0. *Georgia Peruvian Ochre Co.*v. *Cherokee Ochre Co.,*152 *Ga.*150, 154 (108 S. E. 609).

3. The judge did not err in dismissing the action on general demurrer to the petition. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*64
      *John I. Kelley*and *Edith Campbell,*for plaintiffs.

*Tye, Thomson & Tye,*for defendant.