alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d)) and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                14, 2008 |   | /s/                David M. Bradley          |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| Dated                          |   | David                M. Bradley              |
|                           |   | Chairman,                President & CEO |

----
#### Cheryl JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sandra GREGORY; Mecklenburg Department of Social Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1617

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 24, 2017

Decided: August 28, 2017

Cheryl Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cheryl Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jones’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Jones has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s- judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar*648gument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of WPCS International Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew
Hidalgo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  July
      29, 2008
            By:/s/ ANDREW
      HIDALGOAndrew
      HidalgoChief
      Executive Officer
#### Cynthia M. Jones, Resp’t, v. The City of Troy, App’lt.

*R. A. Parmenter,*for resp’t; *Martin I. Townsend,*for app’lt.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Affirming 22 N. Y. State Rep., 276.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6826 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 623
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6826

                          [Report No. 118-738]

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
   Monument and Historic Shrine as the Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                           Education Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2023

   Mr. Mfume (for himself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Harris, Mr. 
  Raskin, Mr. Trone, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. Ivey) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

                           November 14, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
   Monument and Historic Shrine as the Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                           Education Center.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The visitor and education center at Fort McHenry 
National Monument and Historic Shrine, currently located at 2400 E Fort 
Ave, Baltimore, MD 21230, is designated as the ``Paul S. Sarbanes 
Visitor and Education Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other document of the United States to the visitor center 
designated by subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and Education Center.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 623

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6826

                          [Report No. 118-738]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the visitor and education center at Fort McHenry National 
   Monument and Historic Shrine as the Paul S. Sarbanes Visitor and 
                           Education Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Letter
of Authorization 


 


I, Haijuan Xu, a citizen of the People’s
Republic of China (the “PRC”) (Passport Number: G37404222), am the beneficial controlling shareholder of Beijing Lianhe
Chuangxiang Advertising Co., Ltd. (北京联合创想广告有限公司)
(the “Company”) (the “Equity Interests”). I hereby irrevocably appoint Galaxy Strategy & Communications
(Beijing) Management Co., Ltd. (北京银河星系管理咨询有限公司)
(“Galaxy Beijing”) to, within the validity term of this letter (the “Letter”), exercise the following rights:


 


Authorize a person designated by Galaxy
Beijing as my sole and exclusive agent to represent myself to exercise all rights in connection with the Company and Equity Interests,
including, but not limited to: (1) exercising all shareholder rights and voting rights in accordance with the Company’s articles
of association and the applicable PRC laws, including without limitation to selling, transferring or pledging or disposing part
or all of the Equity Interests; and (2) as my authorized representative, nominating and appointing the legal representative (Chairman),
directors, supervisors, general manager and other senior management of the Company.


 


The person designated by Galaxy Beijing
shall have the right to sign the equity interest transfer agreement as stated in the Agreement for Exclusive Purchase Right (me
being a signing party) for and on behalf of me within the scope of this Letter, and duly perform the Equity Pledge Agreement and
Agreement for Exclusive Purchase Right (me being a signing party to both agreements) executed on the same day as this Letter. Exercising
the aforesaid rights will not constitute any restrictions on this Letter.


 


All actions taken by the person designated
by Galaxy Beijing in connection with the Company and Equity Interests shall be deemed as my own, and all documents signed by the
authorized person shall be deemed as signed by myself. I will acknowledge them.


 


The person designated by Galaxy Beijing
shall have the right to assign this authorization and can act in his way through authorizing other person or entity to conduct
the aforesaid matters, without prior notice to or consent from me.


 


From execution this Letter is irrevocable
and will remain in effect for so long as I remain a shareholder of the Company.


 


Within the validity term of the Letter,
I hereby forfeit all rights related to the Equity Interests that have been authorized to Galaxy Beijing through this Letter.


 


	/s/ Haijuan Xu	 
	Name: Haijuan Xu	 
	 	 
	Date: July 8, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROGER J. MCBRIDE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 283 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Carl Doron WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-13210 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(April 19, 2017)

David Charles Waterman, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, Andrew C. Searle, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

James Carl Doron Williams, AUSP Thomson Satellite Camp, Thomson, IL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Baghdadi, appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the en*631tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams’s motions for appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as moot.
EX PARTE David Jerome RUSSELL

CR-16-0038

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 3, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

October 16, 2009 

139015 

LIGHTHOUSE PLACE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 

Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee, 

v SC: 139015 

 COA: 280863 

Berrien CC: 05-003263-CH 

MOORINGS ASSOCIATION, d/b/a/ 

MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ThirdParty-Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

HARBOR GRAND, LLC and LIGHT HARBOR 

MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, 

Third-Party-Defendants, 

and 

LIGHT HARBOR MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM 

ASSOCIATION, 

Cross-Plaintiff, 

v 

HARBOR GRAND, LLC, 

Cross-Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the 

slander of title issue. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) 

whether the trial court clearly erred in rejecting the defendant’s assertion that it acted on 

advice of counsel in authorizing the recording of a 2005 amendment to a 1997 agreement 

with Harbor Grand, LLC, which 2005 amendment purported to remove from a list of 

easements to be terminated by the 1997 agreement a parking easement provided to the 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 16, 2009 

s1013 

 

2

Moorings in a 1985 agreement between the defendant and New Buffalo Harbor, Inc; and 

(2) whether, if the defendant acted on advice of counsel in recording the 2005 

amendment, a finding of malice is precluded, requiring the dismissal of the plaintiff’s 

slander of title claim against the defendant.
#### Eddie Rudy RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70648

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

OCTOBER 3, 2017

Eddie Rudy Ramirez, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Timothy Hayes, Trial, Oil, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eddie Rudy Ramirez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for relief and ordering removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and we review for substantial evidence the agem cy’s factual. findings. *See Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005); *Quijadas-Aguilar v. Lynch,*799 F.3d 1303, 1305 (9th Cir. 2015). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Ramirez has not challenged the BIA’s denial of asylum as untimely filed. *See Corro-Barragan v. Holder,*718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening brief resulted in waiver).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture, where Ramirez failed to show it was more likely than not that a government official in Guatemala would torture him or consent or acquiesce to his torture. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.18(a)(1), *Zheng v. Holder,*644 F.3d 829, 835 (9th Cir. 2011).

The agency did not err in determining Ramirez’s conviction for possession of cocaine under Cal. Health and Safety Code § 11350(a) renders him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II).. He is therefore statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C). *460Because his conviction involved cocaine, he is not eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (waiving inadmissibility for “a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana”). Accordingly, he is also ineligible to adjust status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a)(2), because he is inadmissible.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Ramirez’s unexhausted contentions regarding post-conviction relief. *See Tijani v. Holder,*628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of Prudential Securities Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                              |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Ronald J. Ivans                                                           |  |  |  | 
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner August 13, 2004 |  |
Exhibit
3.6








CERTIFICATE
OFAMENDMENT TO THE


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION OF





LANDBANK
GROUP, INC.





Landbank
Group, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does
hereby certify that:





I.           The
Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a meeting duly held on October 26,
2007, has duly adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the
following amendments to the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation
(together, the “Amendment”):





a.      Article
One is hereby amended to read as follows:




“The name of the Corporation is Trist
Holdings, Inc.”




b.           Article
Five is hereby amended to read as follows:





“The
Corporation shall be authorized to issue Two Billion (2,000,000,000) shares of
common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.”





II.           That
thereafter, a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon, acting
by written consent in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware, approved the amendment.





III.           That
said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.








IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by
Eric Stoppenhagen, its Interim President & Secretary, this 31st day of
December, 2007.











By:           /s/ ERIC
STOPPENHAGEN


Name: 
Eric Stoppenhagen


Title:    Interim
President & Secretary
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |           |   |   |                                                 |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | March 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/    | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |           |   | Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |           |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |           |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |           |   |   |                                                 |
|   |           |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | March 10, 2011 | By:    | /s/    | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |           |   | Name:  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |           |   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |           |   |   |                                                 |
|   |           |   |   |                                                 |

----
1

Opinion issued July 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00324-CV

———————————

BRIDGET AUSMUS, Appellant

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Probate

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CI50623

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Bridget Ausmus, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); 

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts 
2

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket 

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). 

Further, Ausmus has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing 

the clerk’s record, nor the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), (c). After 

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not 

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of 

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-23-00251-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-005575-2

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

KENNETH MAGNUSON, Appellant

V.

MATTRESS FIRM, INC., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered Appellant’s “Notice of Dismissal.” We grant the motion 

and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 7, 2023