alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A)
    
    Westernbank Puerto Rico  an insured non-member commercial bank organized and existing
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.Subsidiaries of Westernbank Puerto Rico:
 1.
    
    Westernbank World Plaza,
Inc.  incorporated
under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, for the purpose of
owning, developing,
managing and operating a
23-story office building,
including its related
parking facility, located
in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico.2.
    
    SRG Net, Inc. 
incorporated under the
laws of the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, for the
operation of an
electronic funds transfer
network.3.
    
    W International Corp.
(Inactive)  an
International banking
entity incorporated under
the laws of the
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, to carry commercial
banking and related
services, and treasury
and investment activities
outside of Puerto Rico.4.
    
    Westernbank Financial
Center Corp. 
incorporated under the
provision of Section
607.0501 of the Florida
Business Corporation Act
of the State of Florida,
to carry commercial
lending and related
services and activities
in the United States of
America. The corporation
commenced its operations
in February 2007, was largely inactive, and was closed during the third quarter of 2008.
 B)
    
    Westernbank Insurance Corp.  a registered insurance agency organized and existing under
the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. On May 19, 2008, the Company transferred
100% of its ownership in Westernbank Insurance Corp to Westernbank Puerto Rico.C)
    
    Westernbank Securities, Inc. (Inactive)  a registered securities broker-dealer incorporated under the
laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,279
<SECURITIES>                                     4,624
<RECEIVABLES>                                      921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,043
<PP&E>                                           3,590
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,524
<SALES>                                          5,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,028
<CGS>                                            1,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.30)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.30)
<FN>
<F1>For purposes of this exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Resource-Related Research Projects (R24 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         March 25, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                              ( print page 11726)    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sandip Bhattacharyya, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 292-0189,                         *sandip.bhattacharyya@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 24, 2022.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-04359 Filed 3-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Shelia Kay JONES Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-1290

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 2017

Filed: October 30, 2017

Daniel S. Jones, Binder & Binder, New York, NY, William B, Ryan, Donati Law Firm, LLP, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Jonathan Ryan Clark, Traci B. Davis, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel Region VI, Dallas, TX, Stacey E. McCord, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After plaintiff Shelia Jones was awarded past-due disability benefits by the Social Security Administration (SSA) on remand *588by the district court, she sought—through counsel—$13,000 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The district court found that the hourly fee resulting from the requested amount was excessive, and that the $4,244.82 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act—upon the district court’s remand to the SSA— was appropriate. Jones appeals.

The Supreme Court has stated that, while the district court may consider the hourly rate in determining the reasonableness of a fee award, the court must first consider the fee agreement, testing it for reasonableness; then reduce the fees based on the character of the representation and results achieved, whether counsel was responsible for delay, and whether the benefits achieved were large in comparison to the time expended by counsel. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08, 122 S.Ct. 1817, 152 L.Ed.2d 996 (2002). Because the record does not show whether the district court conducted the required analysis, we conclude that remand is appropriate. See Jorstad v. IDS Realty Trust, 643 F.2d 1305, 1312 (8th Cir. 1981) (abuse of discretion review); see also Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 U.S. 132, 139, 126 S.Ct. 704, 163 L.Ed.,2d 547 (2005) (decision left to district court’s discretion must still be guided by sound legal principles).

Accordingly, we remand the case for further consideration consistent with this opinion.
Order entered July 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00195
- CV
DR. ERIC VANDERWERFF , D.C., Appellant

V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
- DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND COM MISSIONER RYAN BRANN AN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND THE TRA VELERS INDEMNITY COM PANY OF CONNECTICUT, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 02886



### O RDER Appellant Dr. Eric Vanderwerff, D.C.’s unopposed motion for exten sion of time to file a rely brief is GRANTED . Appellant’s reply brief is due August 31, 2015

.
/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6810 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6810

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 518 North Ridgewood Drive in Sebring, Florida, as the ``U.S. Army 
       Air Corps Major Thomas B. McGuire Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. U.S. ARMY AIR CORPS MAJOR THOMAS B. MCGUIRE POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 518 North Ridgewood Drive in Sebring, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``U.S. Army Air Corps Major Thomas B. 
McGuire Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``U.S. Army 
Air Corps Major Thomas B. McGuire Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered September 26, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00538
- CV GWENDOLYN BYARS, Appellant

V. MANUEL H. ORNELAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 01578
- E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 24, 2018 motion for an extension of time to file a jurisdictional letter brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to Octobe r 8, 2018

.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan RODRIGUEZ-AGUIRRE, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41136 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 14, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for

Juan Rodriguez-Aguirre, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Rodriguez-Aguirre has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Aguirre has filed a response.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Rodriguez-Aguirre’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review before our panel. In his response, Rodriguez-Aguirre challenges, *inter alia,*the enhancement applied pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Ll.l(b)(7)(D) (2015) due to the death of an undocumented alien. He argues that while this circuit applies a but-for causation requirement to determine whether an offense caused a death, other circuits apply a proximate cause standard, which he contends is the proper standard. This contention is foreclosed, *see United States v. Ramos-Delgado,*763 F.3d 398, 401-02 (5th Cir. 2014), but by raising the issue, Rodriguez-Aguirre has preserved it for further review.

The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur*297ther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be. published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20078

Conference Calendar

 

VINOD K. AGGARWAL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MADELEINE ALBRIGHT, 

SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES; 

JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General; 

AMERICAN CONSUL, in New Delhi, India, 

Individually and His Official Capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-1255

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vinod K. Aggarwal appeals from the district court's grant of

the defendants’ motion to dismiss his claims for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). In his

complaint, Aggarwal sought review of a consular officer’s denial

of visa applications for his wife and children. "[D]ecisions of

United States consuls on visa matters are nonreviewable by the
No. 97-20078 

-2-

courts." Centeno v. Shultz, 817 F.2d 1212, 1213-14 (5th Cir.

1987); see Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753, 766 (1972).

Aggarwal has not raised on appeal the argument asserted in

the district court that he was entitled to relief under Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). Therefore, this issue has been abandoned. See Evans

v. City of Marlin, Tex., 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6**  **875**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v.
ROBERT JONES , Defendant

- Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri ct of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris , Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00001

- JCC

- 4 )

Submitted : August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirm ed by un publ ished per curiam opinion

.

Robert Jones , Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Steven Donald Mellin , Assistant United States Attorney s , Alexandria , Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM :
Robert Jones appeals the district court ’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States

v. Jones , No. 1: 08

- cr - 00001

- JCC

- 4 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2010 );
United States v. Hood , 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , __ U.S. __, 130 S. Ct. 321 (2009) (noting that defendant convicted
of a crack offense , but sentenced pursuant to a mandatory statutory minimum sentenc e , is ineligible for a reduction under
§ 3582(c)(2) )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Zimbra Page 1 of2 

Zimbra rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

Re: Boston Executive Helicopters 

From :Russ Maguire, A.A.E. ,ACE 

<rmaguire@norwoodma.gov> 

Subject: Re: Boston Executive Helicopters 

To: CHRISTOPHER DONOVAN 

<christopherdonovan1@gmail.com> 

Mon, Sep 27, 2010 04:10 PM 

Thanks Chris . I ' ll put this into the packet for October ' s 

meeting , which is tentatively scheduled for 10/13. As mentioned 

in our earlier meeting , please have your insurance provider list 

the two aircraft and their covered use (e . g ., flight training , 

charter, etc . ) on the certificate , which you ' ll want to get us a 

copy of prior to the meeting . Regarding your safety and noise 

abatement program, I would incorporate this into a document . 

(1 - 2 pages) I have some safety/noise abatement programs already 

on file , from other commercially permitted businesses . So , 

rather than re - invent the wheel , I ' ll be happy to provide you 

with copies, which can simply be adopted . 

Russ 

----- Original Message - - - - -

From : "CHRISTOPHER DONOVAN " <christopherdonovanl@gmail . com> 

To : "Russ Maguire , A.A . E. , ACE" <rmaguire@norwoodma . gov> 

Sent : Friday, September 24 , 2010 6 : 15 : 02 PM GMT - 05 : 00 US/Canada 

Eastern 

Subject : Boston Executive Helicopters 

Mr. Maguire , 

As we discussed today , I am looking to add Flight instruction 

and rental to my Commercial permit . 

We have 2 Helicopters, N6089J and N80KK under Boston Executive 

Helicopters . 

I have classroom space and an office as well as hanger space in 

our current location that exceeds the required space . 

I plan on reviewing the Airport Noise abatement procedures with 

all students and staff and will fly friendly . 

We own our own hangers here at Norwood . 

https://ncs.norwoodma.gov/h/printmessage?id=l3884&tz=America!New _York 411 8/2015 
Zimbra 

We have a listed telephone on file . 

I currently have insurance on file in accordance with the 

requirements of the Commission . 

Thank you , 

Christopher Donovan 

Boston Executive Helicopters 

Russ Maguire , A. A. E., ACE 

Manager , Norwood Memorial Airport 

Business phone (781) 255 - 5616 

https:/ /ncs.norwoodma.gov /h/printmessage?id= 13 8 84&tz= America/New_ York 

Page 2 of2 

4/18/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000884124  
<NAME>                        GALEY & LORD
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000                
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-03-1998              
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-28-1997              
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-28-1998              
<CASH>                               16,505             
<SECURITIES>                              0             
<RECEIVABLES>                       197,388             
<ALLOWANCES>                              0             
<INVENTORY>                         178,591             
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    423,531             
<PP&E>                              490,115             
<DEPRECIATION>                       78,639             
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,045,030             
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               149,853             
<BONDS>                             698,059             
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0             
<PREFERRED>                               0             
<COMMON>                                121             
<OTHER-SE>                          108,585             
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,045,030             
<SALES>                             364,792             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    364,792             
<CGS>                               320,880             
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       320,880             
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0             
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0             
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   20,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       6,659
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,986
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         524
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          3,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .29
        

</TABLE>