### 1

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TO: Jodi Howard , U.S. EPA, Sector Policies and Programs Division/ Coatings and

Chemicals Group

FROM: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

DATE: April 11

, 2011

SUBJECT: Baseline Emission Estimates for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC)

Production Source Category

1.0 Introduction

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under section 112 of the Clean Air

Act (CAA), is required to establish National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

(NESHAP) emitted fro m polyvinyl chloride and copolymer (PVC) production facilities. The

complete set of regulated hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) is listed in CAA section 112(b). In

order to assess the effects of regulatory requirements on these HAPs, it is first necessary to

determine HAP emissions at the current level of control at each PVC production facility. These

emissions are referred to as the baseline emissions. As a part of this rulemaking, each PVC

production facility was required to provide responses to an inf ormation collection that included a

survey, stack testing and stripped resin sampling under the authority of CAA section 114. These

data were used to estimate baseline emissions.

This memorandum describes the development of baseline emissions estimates for

existing sources in the PVC production source category. Section 2.0 discusses the sources of

data used in the development of the baseline emission estimates, Section 3.0 presen ts the

methodology used to estimate baseline emissions, and Section 4.0 summarizes the results of this

analysis.

Each facility was required to conduct tests for vinyl chloride (VC) and other hazardous

air pollutants ( HAP ) at the inlet and outlet of the control systems (e.g. thermal oxidizers in series

with an acid gas scrubber). Additionally, stack testing was also required to determine hydrogen

chloride ( HCl ) and chlorinated dibenzodioxin and dibenzofuran (CDD/CDF) emissions at the

control system’s out let. The stack tests consisted of three runs and the facilities were required to

provide PVC production rate, the exhaust gas flow rate and oxygen concentration during testing.

Some of the facilities are co

- located with other manufacturing process such a s vinyl chloride

monomer and ethylene dichloride and also share a common control device. Most of the facilities

segregated the PVC production streams during testing, but a few facilities tested with streams

from other manufacturing sources which may accou nt for higher emissions than if just PVC

production were being conducted.

### 2

Each facility, with the exception of CertainTeed was required to conduct stripped resin

sampling for 30 days as a part of the CAA section 114 information collection (section 114)

. The

sec tion 114 required e ach facility to take samples of the stripped resin being produced daily over

a 30

- day period at the outlet s of the resin stripper (s) and the resin dryer(s)

. The facilities

analyzed the samples for the concentration(s) of HAP pres ent in the resin and then calculated the

corresponding mass of each HAP present in the stripped resin, based on the analysis of the

concentration in each of the samples.

2.0 Data Sources

The data sources used in the baseline emissions analysis are describe d in a separate

memo

. 1



### 3.0 Methodology for Estimating Baseline Emissions

Baseline emissions were estimated for 7 emission points in the PVC production source

category: process vents, resin residuals, storage tanks, heat exchange systems, equipment leaks,

other emission sources, and wastewater. The general methodology consisted of multiplying a

HAP concentration by the emission point flow rate and assuming an operating time of 8,400

hours per year (with 2 weeks or 336 hours of downtime). Baseline emissions from certain

emission points or sources, such as equipment leaks, were d etermined using EPA supplied

factors; other emission estimates were supplied by facilities in their section 114 ( survey and

testing ) responses. In multiple instances, a complete emissions data set did not exist for a given

emission point or source. Avera ge factors were used to estimate facility emissions where data

did not exist. A description of how baseline emissions were determined is provided below.

3.1 Process Vents

Annual baseline emissions from process vents were estimated in the PVC production

source category for VC, HCl, CDD/CDF, and total organic HAP. The total organic HAP

estimated includes VC and CDD/CDF emissions, but does not include HCl or other non

- organic

HAP. Baseline emissions estimates were calculated using the facility submitted process vent

stack testing information reported in the section 114 , which included . HAP concentrations,

exhaust gas flow rates, and oxygen concentrations. The determinatio n of HAP concentrations is

described in a separate memo. 2



### Process vent test results from Shintech

- Plaquemine were not used in the analysis because

concentrations in the inlet to the thermal oxidizer were reported to be less than the outlet

concentration. Baseline emissions from this facility were calculated using the flow rates reported

by Shintech Plaquemine and the thermal oxidizer outlet concentrations from the Shintech Addis

facility. Information provided by the company indicates the Addis facility i s similar to the

Plaquemine facility in terms of resin produced, equipment used, and process layout and would be

the best source for using a similar emission profile without potential errors.

A process vent exhaust gas flow rate was calculated for each fa cility and used to estimate

baseline emissions. Since a single test method cannot be used to determine all of the HAP

concentrations in an emission stream, each facility used multiple test methods to determine the

### 3

concentrations of HAP present in their ex haust gas stream. Not all test methods can be

conducted concurrently; therefore, multiple volumetric flow rates were reported for each process

vent at every facility. Facilities were required to perform 3 test runs for each test method they

conducted, s o 3 volumetric flow rates were reported for each test method. The volumetric flow

rate used in the baseline emission estimation was determined by calculating the average flow rate

for each test method for each facility. The maximum average flow rate was then selected for

each facility and used to estimate baseline emissions. For example, one facility may have

determined the concentration of VC, HCl, and CDD/CDF using Method 0031, Method 26, and

Method 23 respectively. Each method was comprised of 3 test runs, for a total of 9 individual

volumetric flow rates. The volumetric flow rates were averaged for each test method, resulting

in 3 volumetric flow rate averages. The maximum average value was then selected for the

baseline emissions calculation. The maximum average volumetric flow rate was used to

calculate a conservatively high baseline emissions estimate.

A process vent exhaust gas oxygen concentration was also calculated for each facility and

used to estimate baseline emissions. Facilities were required to report HAP concentrations

corrected to a 3 percent oxygen basis. Concentration data are not directly comparable if reported

on various oxygen concentration bases; however, to calculate a HAP mass flow rate, it is

necessary to convert the conc entration data point to the actual oxygen concentration of the

exhaust gas. As stated in the exhaust gas volumetric flow rate discussion, facilities used multiple

test methods to determine HAP concentrations and reported multiple oxygen concentrations in

their exhaust gas stream. The oxygen concentration used in the baseline emission s estimation

was determined by calculating the average oxygen concentration for each test method for each

facility. The average test method oxygen concentrations were then av eraged to determine an

overall average oxygen concentration for each facility’s process vent exhaust gas stream. It was

assumed that facilities would more than likely control oxygen concentration (i.e., excess air) to a

relatively constant level, regardle ss of flow rate; an average oxygen concentration was used in

the baseline emissions estimate.

Using the equations presented in Appendix A and the average exhaust gas flow rate and

oxygen concentrations previously discussed, baseline emissions were determ ined for VC, HCl,

CDD/CDF and total organic HAP.

Baseline emissions for CDD/CDF were estimated on a toxic equivalency (TEQ) basis.

For each facility, the 17 CDD/CDF congeners were converted from a total mass basis to a TEQ

basis as described in a separat e memo 2



### . CDD/CDF compounds vary in toxicity. Converting

mass based CDD/CDF values to TEQ allows one to compare releases of total CDD/CDF on a

toxicity basis 3



### . The concentrations of the 17 congeners were summed to obtain the total

CDD/CDF TEQ concentrati on for each facility. Annual baseline emissions were then calculated

using the equations presented in Appendix A.

Total organic HAP baseline emissions were calculated by determining and summing the

annual baseline emissions for each organic HAP compound reported by facilities using the

equations presented in Appendix A. HCl was not included in the total organic HAP baseline

estimate, as HCl is not an organic compound. CDD/CDF was not converted to a TEQ basis for

the total organic HAP sum to reflect the actual tonnage of total organic HAP.

### 4

Details of the analysis can be found in Attachment A . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for process vents are presented in Section 4.0.

3.2 Stripped Resin

HAP emissions from vents associated with processes downstream of the resin stripper are

dependent on the concentration of HAP in the stripped resin. That is, the greater the HAP

concentration in the stripped resin, the greater the HAP emissions from downs tream process

components. Similarly, the lower the HAP concentration in the stripped resin, the lower the

HAP emissions from downstream process components.

Annual baseline emissions resulting from residual VC and total HAP remaining in the

stripped resin were estimated for each PVC production facility. As discussed above, i t was

assumed that the total amount of all residual VC and other organic HAP in the stripped resin

would be emitted from process equipment downstream of the resin stripper (or in proces s

equipment following polymerization if there is no separate resin stripper). For facilities that

manufacture a type of resin other than a bulk resin, t he majority of these emissions would likely

occur from the resin centrifuge and/or dryer vents as the r esin slurry is dried

. The manufacture

of bulk resins does not require the use of a resin dryer as the product is a solid and not a slurry

after the polymerization process . For bulk resin facilities, there may be emissions downstream of

the polymerization reactors, but these emissions would be particulate emissions from solids

handling operations and would be negligible. For all non

- bulk PVC facilities, b aseline emissions

from stripped resins were estimated based on the calculated or reported residual VC and total

HAP concentrations in the stripped resin(s) for each facility and assuming that 100 percent of the

pollutant mass is subsequently emitted from the facility from operations downstream of the resin

stripper

. As discussed above for em i s s ions from b ulk resin production facilities, the baseline

emissions from stripped resins for CertainTeed

– Lake Charles were assumed to be zero.

To conservatively estimate emissions, the m aximum r esin flow rates were extracted from

F orm K

- 2

- A of the section 114 survey responses. For facilities with multiple resin strippers , all

the stripped resin stream flow rates were totaled for each facility. One facility that produces

dispersion resin and one facility that produces suspension resin did not report a resin stream flow

rate in their survey response. For these two facilities , t he average resin stream flow rate from the

other facilities in the sam e subcategory was assumed

. The residual VC and total HAP

concentrations in the stripped resin for each facility that were calculated for the MACT floor

analysis 2 

### were also used with the resin flow rate to estimate the annual mass emissions using

Equation 5 , found in Appendix A.

Details of this analysis can be found in Attachment B . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for resins are presented in Section 4.0.

3.3 Storage Vessels

VC and total HAP baseline emissions from storage vessels were provided by each facility

on F orm O of the section 114 survey responses. 1 

### Total HAP w ere estimated by summing all the

organic HAP pollutants for each facility. A percentage of facilities indicated that storage vessel

emissions were not calculated or recorded. A number of facilities reported pollutant vapor

### 5

pressures and concentrations, but did not provide an estimate for annual emissions. To estimate

the industry total baseline emissions from storage vessels , the ave rage factors were applied to

those facilities which did not report annual emissions.

Details of this analysis can be found in Attachment C . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for storage vessels are presented in Section 4.0.

3.4 Heat Exchange Systems

VC and total HAP baseline emissions from heat exchange systems were calculated for

each facility by extracting data from survey form ’s C

- 1

- A, D, and K

- 1

- C the section 114

. Only

one facility provided emissions estimates of VC and other volatile org anic compound s (VOC)

from cooling towers. T he average VC emission s per average cooling tower recirculation rate

and the average VOC emission s per average cooling tower recirculation rate were calculated

using the data reported by the facility to estimate the emissions from all other cooling towers

. Cooling towers for each facility were then identified using form C

- 1

- A of the section 114 survey.

Cooling water recirculation rates were extracted for each cooling tower identified in the section

114 survey an d multiplied by the average VC and other VOC emission factors to obtain

estimated VC and other VOC emissions for each cooling tower. T he VC and other VOC

emission s were added to obtain a total HAP estimate for each cooling tower. VC and total HAP

emissio ns from each cooling tower were summed to obtain a baseline emission estimate from

heat exchange systems for each facility.

Details of this analysis can be found in Attachment D . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for heat exchange systems are presented in Section 4.0.

3.5 Equipment Leaks

Baseline emissions from equipment leaks were calculated by applying the control

effectiveness associated with leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs used by each facility to

uncontrolled emissions estimated for each facility. Emissions were calculated on an equipment

basis (e.g., valves, pumps, compressors, open

- ended lines, sampling connections, pressure relief

devices, connectors) and then summed over all equipment to calculate facility emissions.

EPA’s 1995 P rotocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates 4 

### (i.e., Protocol) provides

control efficiency estimates on an equipment basis based on the requirements of the LDAR

program for which a facility complies. The LDAR program requirements include monitoring

frequ ency (monthly, quarterly, etc), leak definition (10,000 ppm, 500 ppm, etc), and equipment

specifications (caps for open

- ended lines, non

- leaking equipment, etc). Data provided in survey

responses showed that PVC facilities comply with the requirements of 40 CFR part 61 Subpart F

(which references the equipment leak requirements of 40 CFR part 60 Subpart V), or the

requirements in 40 CFR part 63 Subpart UU. These two standards have similar requirements for

most equipment. The primary difference is the mon itoring frequency and leak definitions for

valves and pumps, with Subpart UU having more stringent requirements for these components.

Uncontrolled emissions are also calculated using procedures documented in the Protocol.

Uncontrolled emissions are cal culated by multiplying the average uncontrolled emission factors

for each piece of equipment (in lbs VOC emitted/component/hour), equipment counts at each

### 6

facility, and the hours of operation. The hours of operation were assumed to be 8400 for this

analy sis, which allows for 2 weeks downtime. The uncontrolled emission factors associated with

chemical manufacturing processes were obtained from the Protocol. Information was not

collected on the compounds in PVC process streams to determine speciation prof iles from

equipment leak emissions. However, almost all the compounds in process lines at PVC facilities

are HAPs (vinyl chloride, ethylene dichloride, etc). Consequently, the emissions are also

expected to be all or a majority of HAPs. Therefore, the e stimated VOC emitted was considered

for this analysis to be total organic HAP.

Information on actual equipment counts at each PVC facility were not collected in the

section 114 . Consequently, model equipment counts developed by EPA for other chemical

f acilities were used in this analysis. 5 

### The model equipment counts are associated with 3

categories of facilities: (1) facilities with highly complex processes that require a number of

pipelines and equipment, (2) facilities with moderately complex process es (which have less

process lines or equipment), and (3) facilities with low complexity processes (which have a basic

level of process lines or equipment). For this analysis, it was assumed that PVC facilities would

fit into the second category, moderatel y complex, because, while the processes are basic, a

facility could have a number of different process lines to make different grades of PVC resin.

For very small facilities, such as the one synthetic minor facility (CertainTeed

- Lake Charles)

that also produces resin in a different process than all the other PVC facilities (bulk resin

production), this assumption may overestimate emissions, and equi pment counts from a low

complexity process may be more appropriate. Consequently, u ncontrolled emissions (and

subsequent baseline emissions) were calculated using equipment counts for a low complexity

facility

.

Attachment E summarizes the model componen ts used in the analysis, the LDAR

program the facility is currently using, and the baseline emissions estimated for the facility.

Results of the baseline emissions estimation for equipment leaks are presented in Section 4.0.

3.6 Other Emission Sources

A nnual baseline emissions of VC and total HAP from reactor openings and process

component openings were estimated by most facilities and submitted as part of their survey

responses

. For those facilities, emissions data were reported for either vinyl chloride, to tal VOC,

or both. One facility also reported estimated emissions for vinyl acetate and methanol in

addition to vinyl chloride and total VOC. Estimates for total HAP emissions for each facility

were calculated as the sum of all reported HAP emissions

. E m ission factor s for vinyl chloride

and for methanol were calculated based on the provided data and were used to estimate vinyl

chloride and total HAP emissions for those facilities that did not provide emissions estimates

from reactor openings or process c omponent openings. Two d ifferent emission factors were

calculated ; one for suspension resin facilities and another for dispersion resin facilities

. The

calculated emission factor s for VC and methanol were then applied to the facilities according to

the type of resin manufactured (suspension or dispersion) and total annual emissions for vinyl

chloride and total HAP were calculated

.

Details of this analysis can be found in Attachment F . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for other emission sources are presented in Section 4.0.

### 7

3.7 Wastewater

Baseline wastewater generation of VC and total HAP emissions w ere determined for

three categories of wastewater; stripper outlets, uncontrolled streams, and maintenance

wastewater. Only a small percentage o f facilities reported adequate information for each

category. T he emissions of the remaining facilities were estimated by calculating average factors

from the wastewater data set

.

The following steps were taken to calculate baseline wastewater generation :

1. E ach reported wastewater stream was identified as one of 3 categories : stripper outlet

, uncontrolled, or maintenance.

2. F acility supplied process flow diagrams and originating equipment designations were

used to identify str ipper outlet streams.

3. A stream w as assumed uncontrolled if it was exposed to the atmosphere and not

previously identified as a stripper outlet

.

4. Facilities reported m aintenance wastewater in a separate section of the survey ;

therefore, no additional categorization was needed

.

T he summation of the stripper outlet, uncontrolled, and maintenance wastewater streams

were assumed to represent the total wastewater generated by a facility

. A nnual generation of VC

and total HAP emissions in each wastewater stream was calculated using Equat ion 6 , found in

Appendix A.

To estimate the VC and total HAP emissions generated by facilities that did not report

sufficient wastewater information, the available data set was used to develop and apply average

factors to the under

- reported facilities. T h ree factors were developed for each wastewater

category : the average amount of wastewater generated per pound of resin produced, the average

concentration of VC , and the average co n centration of total HAP.

Only a percentage of facilities reported total an nual wastewater generation for each

wastewater category

. Therefore, it was necessary to estimate the annual wastewater generation

for facilities that did not provide information. For each wastewater category, t he average

tonnage of wastewater generated p er pound of resin produced was calculated by dividing the

total tons of wastewater generated by the total pounds of resin produced in 2008 for each facility

that provided adequate wastewater information and non

- confidential production data. The values

were then averaged to obtain a wastewater generation factor based on resin production for each

wastewater category

. The CertainTeed

- Lake Charles facility was excluded from the average

calculation because of the anhydrous nature of the bulk process. Sin ce a relatively small amount

of water is used in the production of bulk resin, inclusion in the average would decrease the

estimation of wastewater generated by unknown suspension and dispersion facilities.

Similar to wastewater generation, only a fractio n of facilities reported the VC and total

HAP concentrations in each wastewater category

. Therefore, it was necessary to estimate the

average annual VC and total HAP concentration for t he remainder of the facilities. All

### 8

categorized data provided by ind ustry were used to develop average factors except for

maintenance wastewater. Of the three facilities that reported VC and total HAP concentrations

for maintenance wastewater, Shintech

- Freeport reported a low value for total HAP compared to

the other 2 fa cilities. This low value resulted in an average total HAP concentration less that the

average vinyl chloride concentration for maintenance wastewater. Since total HAP includes VC,

the average total HAP concentration must be equal to or greater than the a verage VC

concentration. Therefore, the low value was excluded from the total HAP average.

T he amount of wastewater generated was calculated by multiplying the average tonnage

of wastewater generated per pound of resin produced factor by the 2008 resin capacity rating for

each facility that did not report adequate wastewater data. Once the total amount of wastewater

generated was calculated for each facility, the total amount of VC and total HAP were estimated

by multiplying the average factors by the estimated wastewater generation.

Details of this analysis can be found in Attachment G . Results of the baseline emissions

estimation for wastewater are presented in Section 4.0.

4.0 Results

The following tables present the results of the baseline emissions a nalysis for the PVC

production source category

. Baseline emissions estimates are provided for each facility by

emission point in Tables 4

- 1 through 4

- 7

. Total baseline emissions by pollutant are summarized

in Table 4

- 8. Total baseline emissions by facility are summarized in Table 4

- 9, and total

baseline emissions by emission point are summarized in Table 4

- 10.

Table 4

- 1. Baseli ne Emissions from Process Vents

Company/ Facility Baseline Emissions (Tons Per Year)

VC HCl CDD/CDF T otal Organic HAP

CertainTeed

- Lake Charles 5.84E

- 02 6.77E

- 01 1.32E

- 10 1.09

Dow

- Midland 1.01E

- 04

- 1.44E

- 11 6.29E

- 03

Formosa

- Delaware City 4.88E

- 03 1.41 2.05E

- 11 5.06E

- 02

Formosa

- Point Comfort 1.13E

- 05 1.00E

- 02 2.09E

- 08 4.96E

- 02

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 3.57E

- 04 6.85E

- 01 1.35E

- 09 2.07E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

- Plaquemine 6.52E

- 04 29.8 4.95E

- 09 3.13E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

- Aberdeen 2.27E

- 02 1.04 2.04E

- 11 2.05E

- 01

OxyVinyls

- Deer Park 4.38E

- 04

- 7.80E

- 10 1.15

OxyVinyls

- Pasadena 1.62E

- 02 3.50 4.93E

- 11 2.82E

- 01

PolyOne

- Henry 1.12E

- 04 1.59E

- 05

- 9.14E

- 01

PolyOne

- Pedricktown 2.05E

- 05 5.94E

- 06

- 3.55E

- 01

Shintech

- Freeport 8.32E

- 05 1.16E

- 03 7.34E

- 11 3.76E

- 03

Shintech

- Addis 3.77E

- 03 7.67E

- 04 1.02E

- 10 2.62E

- 01

Shintech

- Plaquemine 6.3E

- 02 1.3E

- 02 1.7E

- 09 4. 35

Westlake

- Calvert City 2.87E

- 07 3.27E

- 03 7.77E

- 11 1.04E

- 01

Westlake

- Geismar 3.71E

- 04 1.20E

- 01 5.62E

- 09 1.63

TOTAL * 1.71E

- 01 37.2 3. 58E

- 08 11.0

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding

### 9 VC

– Vinyl Chloride

HCl

– Hydrogen Chloride

CDD/CDF

– Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofurans

TOHAP

– Total organic hazardous air pollutant



### Table 4

- 2

. Baseline Emissions from Stripped Resins

Company/ Facility Resin Type Baseline Emissions

( Tons Per Year )

VC Total HAP

Certain Teed

- Lake Charles Bulk 0 a 0 a

Dow

– Midland Suspension 4.97 66.0

Formosa

- Baton Rouge Suspension 1.17 79.1

Formosa

– Delaware City Dispersion 18.9 59.9

Formosa

– Point Comfort Suspension 2.10E

- 01 26.6

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen Suspension 12.6 159

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine Suspension 69.7 786

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park Suspension 0.241 14.4

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena Suspension 8.91 242

OxyVinyls

– Pedricktown Suspension 1.57 24.5

PolyOne

– Henry Dispersion 9.13 9.1 3

PolyOne

– Pedricktown Dispersion 9.89 15.0

Shintech

– Addis Suspension 9.35E

- 01 112

Shintech

– Freeport Suspension 6.17E

- 01 54.7

Shintech

– Plaquemine Suspension 4.43E

- 01 56.6

Westlake

– Calvert City Suspension 23.2 204

Westlake

– Geismar Suspension 8.86 12.3

TOTAL * 171 1, 922

a Assumed that emissions are zero because resin produced by the bulk resin process does not go

through downstream drying processes since the resin is in solid form after the polymerization

process

. VC

– Vinyl Chloride

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding



### Table 4

- 3. Baseline Emissions from Storage Vessels for the PVC Production Source

Category

Company /Facility Baseline Emissions (Tons Per Year)

VC T otal HAP

CertainTeed

- Lake Charles 0 1.00E

- 04

Formosa

- Delaware City 0 3.53E

- 01

PolyOne

– Henry 0 3.53E

- 01

PolyOne

- Pedricktown 0 3.53E

- 01

Dow

– Midland 0 0

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 3.36E

- 01 1.22

Formosa

- Point Comfort 0 0

Georgia Gulf

- Aberdeen 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

- Plaquemine 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01

### 10 Company /Facility Baseline Emissions (Tons Per Year)

VC T otal HAP

OxyVinyls

- Deer Park 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01

OxyVinyls

- Pasadena 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01

OxyVinyls

- Pedricktown 3.36E

- 01 4.92E

- 01

Shintech

– Addis 8.99E

- 01 1.06

Shintech

- Freeport 3.36E

- 01 2.02E

- 01

Shintech

- Plaquemine 9.02E

- 02 9.02E

- 02

Westlake

- Calvert City 3.36E

- 01 0

Westlake

- Geismar 1.97E

- 02 2.32E

- 02

TOTAL * 3.70 6.12

VC

– Vinyl Chloride

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding



### Table 4

- 4. Baseline Emissions from Hea t Exchange Systems for the PVC Production

Source Category

Company/ Facility Baseline Emissions

( Tons Per Year )

VC T otal HAP

Certain Teed

- Lake Charles 2.03E

- 01 1.33

Dow

- Midland 6.40E

- 02 4.21E

- 01

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 2.90E

- 02 1.91E

- 01

Formosa

– Delaware City 1.07E

- 01 7.02E

- 01

Formosa

– Point Comfort 2.11 13.9

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen 1.07E

- 01 7.02E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine 8.30E

- 01 5.46

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 3.20E

- 01 2.11

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena 2.75E

- 01 1.81

OxyVinyls

- Pedricktown 1.78E

- 01 1.17

PolyOne

– Henry 5.20E

- 01 3.42

PolyOne

– Pedricktown 1.33E

- 03 8.77E

- 03

Shintech

– Addis 5.98E

- 03 3.94E

- 02

Shintech

– Freeport 4.80E

- 03 3.16E

- 02

Shintech

– Plaquemine 5.77E

- 03 3.80E

- 02

Westlake

– Calvert City 3.04E

- 01 2.00

Westlake

- Geismar 1.95E

- 01 1.29

TOTAL * 5. 26 34.6

VC

– Vinyl Chloride

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding

### 11

Table 4

- 5. Baseline Emissions from Equipment Leaks in the PVC Production Source

Category

Company/ Facility LDAR Program Baseline

Emissions

Total Organic

HAP

(TPY) a,b

Certain Teed

- Lake Charles 40CFR61 V 16.5 c

Dow

– Midland 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Formosa

– Delaware City 40CFR63 UU 8.10

Formosa

– Point Comfort 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine 40CFR63 UU 8.10

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 40CFR61 V 59. 3

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena 40CFR61 V 59. 3

OxyVinyls

- Pedricktown 40CFR61 V 59. 3

PolyOne

– Henry 40CFR61 V 59. 3

PolyOne

– Pedricktown 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Shintech

– Addis 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Shintech

– Freeport 40CFR63 UU 8.10

Shintech

– Plaquemine 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Westlake

– Calvert City 40CFR61 V 59. 3

Westlake

- Geismar 40CFR61 V 59. 3

TOTAL * 811

a Based on average VOC emission factors, and assuming all VOC emissions are organic

HAP emissions.

b Based on model equipment counts from a moderately complex chemical facility.

c Based on model equipment counts from a simple complexity chemical facility.

LDAR

– Leak detection and repair

T PY

– Tons per year

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding



### Table 4

- 6. Baseline Emissions from Other Emission Sources for the PVC Productio n

Source Category

Company/ Facility Baseline Emissions (Tons Per Year)

VC T otal HAP

Certain Teed

- Lake Charles 3.35E

- 02 3.35E

- 02

Dow

– Midland 5.06E

- 02 5.10E

- 02

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 1.46E

- 01 1.47E

- 01

Formosa

– Delaware City 1.79E

- 05 1.79E

- 05

Formosa

– Point Comfort 1.13E

- 01 1.14E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen 5.06E

- 02 5.10E

- 02

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine 5.06E

- 02 5.10E

- 02

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 3.04E

- 01 3.06E

- 01

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena 2.02E

- 01 2.05E

- 01

OxyVinyls

- Pedricktown 1.57E

- 01 1.59E

- 01

PolyOne

– Henry 5.06E

- 02 5.10E

- 02

### 12 Company/ Facility Baseline Emissions (Tons Per Year)

VC T otal HAP

PolyOne

– Pedricktown 3.79E

- 05 3.79E

- 05

Shintech

– Addis 6.65E

- 03 7.09E

- 03

Shintech

– Freeport 1.98E

- 01 1.99E

- 01

Shintech

– Plaquemine 2.50E

- 01 2.50E

- 01

Westlake

– Calvert City 9.01E

- 02 9.14E

- 02

Westlake

- Geismar 5.25E

- 02 5.30E

- 02

TOTAL * 1.75 1.77

VC

– Vinyl Chloride

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding



### Table 4

- 7. Baseline Generation of HAP in Wastewater for the PVC Production Source

Category

Company/ Facility Baseline Generation

( Tons Per Year )

VC T otal HAP

Certain Teed

- Lake Charles 3.91E

- 01 3.92E

- 01

Dow

- Midland 2.46E

- 02 1.80E

- 01

Formosa

- Baton Rouge 9.52E

- 01 9.71E

- 01

Formosa

– Delaware City 1.63E

- 01 1.20

Formosa

– Point Comfort 1.78 13.1

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen 9.05E

- 01 9.07E

- 01

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine 1.44 8.61

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 5.93E

- 01 3.89

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena 1.85 3.29

OxyVinyls

- Pedricktown 3.99E

- 01 2.93

PolyOne

– Henry 5.59E

- 01 5.59E

- 01

PolyOne

– Pedricktown 4.40E

- 02 2.82E

- 01

Shintech

– Addis 5.53E

- 01 5.54

Shintech

– Freeport 5.16E

- 03 8.85

Shintech

– Plaquemine 1.14 2.40

Westlake

– Calvert City 1.67E

- 02 8.99E

- 01

Westlake

- Geismar 1.10E

- 01 1.10E

- 01

TOTAL * 10.9 54.1

VC

– Vinyl Chloride

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding

### 13

Table 4

- 8. Summary of Baseline Emissions for the PVC Production Source Category by

Pollutant a

Pollutant Baseline Emissions

( Tons Per Year )

Vinyl Chloride (VC) 193

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 37.3

Chlorinated Dibenzodioxin /

Chlorinated Dibenzofuran (CDD/CDF) 3.53E

- 08

Total HAP 2

, 841

a Process vent emission estimates for Shintech

- Plaquemine are based on values reported by facility in

electronic data submittal. No test report was provided to verify emissions. However, information

provided in the electronic submittal may be incorrect and could be excluded, due to VC concentrations

reported at the inlet of the incinerator being less than the outlet.



### Table 4

- 9. Summary of Baseline Emissions for the PVC Production Source Category by

Facility

Company /Facility Baseline Emissions

( Tons Per Year )

VC HCl CC D/ CD F Total HAP

Certain Teed

– Lake Charles 0.68 6.77E

- 01 1.32E

- 10 19.1

Dow

– Midland 5.11 0 1.44E

- 11 126

Formosa

– Baton Rouge 2.63 6.85E

- 01 1.35E

- 09 141

Formosa

– Delaware City 19.2 1.41 2.05E

- 11 70.3

Formosa

– Point Comfort 4.22 1.00E

- 02 2.09E

- 08 113

Georgia Gulf

– Aberdeen 14.0 1.04 2.04E

- 11 221

Georgia Gulf

– Plaquemine 72.4 29.8 4.95E

- 09 809

OxyVinyls

– Deer Park 1.79 0 7.80E

- 10 81.7

OxyVinyls

– Pasadena 11.6 3.50 4.93E

- 11 308

OxyVinyls

– Pedricktown 2.63 0 0 88.6

Poly One

– Henry 10.3 1.59E

- 05 0 73.7

Poly One

– Pedricktown 9.94 5.94E

- 06 0 75.3

Shintech

– Addis 2.40 7.67E

- 04 1.02E

- 10 178

Shintech

– Freeport 1.16 1.16E

- 03 7.34E

- 11 72.1

Shintech

– Plaquemine 2.0 1.27E

- 02 1. 7 E

- 09 123

Westlake

– Calvert City 24.0 3.27E

- 03 7.77E

- 11 266

Westlake

– Geismar 9.24 1.20E

- 01 5.62E

- 09 74.7

TOTAL * 193 37.3 3.5 8 E

- 08 2

, 841

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding VC

– Vinyl Chloride

HCl

– Hydrogen Chloride

CDD/CDF

– Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofurans

### 14

Table 4

- 10. Summary of Baseline Emissions for the PVC Production Source Category by

Emission Point

Emission Point Baseline Emissions

( Tons P er Y ear )

VC HCl CCD/CDF Total HAP

Process Vents 1.7 1 E

- 01 37. 3 3. 58E

- 08 11.0

Resin 17 1 0 0 1,9 22

Wastewater 10.9 0 0 54.1

Equipment Leaks 0 0 0 811

Storage 3.70 0 0 6.12

Heat Exchange Systems 5.26 0 0 34.6

Other Emission Sources 1.75 0 0 1.77

TOTAL * 193 37.3 3.5 8 E

- 08 2

, 841

*Totals may not add exactly due to rounding VC

– Vinyl Chloride

HCl

– Hydrogen Chloride

CDD/CDF

– Chlorinated dibenzodioxin and chlorinated dibenzofurans

### 15

5.0 References

1. “Information Collection for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production

Source Category ” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency. April 2011.

2. “MACT Floor Analysis for the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymer s (PVC) Production

Source Category” Memorandum from Eastern Research Group, Inc. to Jodi Howard, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency. April 2011.

3. “TRI Dioxin and Dioxin

- like Compound Toxic Equivalency (TEQ) Information Rule

– Final rule.” U.S. EPA, 22 April, 2009. Web. 13 Jan. 2011.

http://www.epa.gov/tri/lawsandregs/teq/teqpfin alrule.html

4. 1995 Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates. U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency. November 1995. EPA

- 453/R

- 95

- 017

.

5. “ Data and Assumptions used in the Equipment Leaks Cost Analysis for the SOCMI.”

Memorandum from Kristin Parrish and David Randall, RTI International, to Karen

Rackley, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. October 31, 2006. (Docket item no.

EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2006

- 0699

- 0035).

### 16

Appendix A

. Equations U sed in Baseline Calculations

Process Vents

Vinyl Chloride, HCl, and Total Organic HAP

Baseline Emissions:

(Eq. 1)

where,

B E 

### = Annual baseline emissions in tons per year,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in parts per million volume at 3 percent oxygen,

O 2 

### = average oxygen concentration of all pollut ant three run tests,

385.3 ft 3 

### = volume, in cubic feet, of one pound mole of ideal gas at 20 ° C (68 ° F)

and one atmosphere of pressure,

MW i 

### = molecular weight of the pollutant in pounds per pound mole, and

= volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas in dry standard cubic meters per

minute.

CDD/CDF (TEQ)

Baseline Emissions:

(Eq. 2)

where,

B E 

### = Annual baseline emissions in tons per year,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in nanograms per dry standard cubic meter at 3 percent

oxygen, TEQ

O 2 

### = average oxygen concentration of all pollutant three run tests, and

= volumetric flow rate of the exhaust gas in dry standard cubic meters per minute.

Conversion of CDD/CDF Concentration from a Mass to Volumetric Basis :

(Eq. 3)

### 17

where,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in micrograms per dry standard cubic meter at 3 percent

oxygen,

MW

g 

### = molecular weight of the compound in grams per gram mole

(Eq. 4)

where,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in nanograms per dry standard cubic meter at 3 percent

oxygen,

MW

g 

### = molecular weight of the compound in grams per gram mole

Resin

Vinyl Chloride and Total Organic HAP

Calculation for Vinyl Chloride and Total Organic HAP Resin Emissions on a Tons per Year

Basis

(Eq. 5)

where:

B E 

### = Annual baseline emissions in tons per year,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in PPM (mass basis), and

= volumetric flow rate of stripped resin in liters per minute.

Wastewater

Vinyl Chloride and Total Organic HAP

Calculation of Annual Generation of Vinyl Chloride and Total Organic HAP in Individual

Wastewater Streams:

(Eq. 6 )

where,

### 18

B

g 

### = Annual baseline generation in tons per year,

C i 

### = pollutant concentration in PPM (mass basis), and

= volumetric flow rate of wastewater in gallons per year.

### 19

Attachments

Attachment A. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Process Vents

Attachment B. Analysis of Baseline Emissions from Residual HAP in Resin

Attachment C. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Storage Tanks

Attachment D. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Heat Exchange Systems

Attachment E. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Equipment Leaks

Attachment F. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Other Emission Sources

Attachment G. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Wastewater

### Attachment A

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Process VentsAttachment ACompany FacilityMaximum Flowrate(DSCMM)Average Stack O2%HCl Reduction Needed%Vinyl ChlorideReduction Needed %DF TMB ReductionNeeded %CertainTeed Lake Charles34.3516.90.9390.698Formosa Delaware City15.745.4PolyOne Henry0.1115.30.853PolyOne Pedricktown0.0418.70.880Westlake Calvert City27.9111.2Formosa Point Comfort-PVC Unit74.9311.00.988Westlake Geismar650.4811.30.651OxyVinyls Deer Park591.0912.5Georgia Gulf Plaquemine336.1510.80.969Formosa Baton Rouge117.529.60.013Dow Midland34.3912.9Shintech Freeport11.042.4Shintech Addis14.307.6OxyVinyls Pasadena15.457.70.671Georgia Gulf Aberdeen10.667.80.840Shintech Plaquemine245.228.0TotalBulkDispersionOtherNotes1 - HCl reduction does not include actual reduction from VC condenser. HCl is only calculated to meet the HCl limit.2 - TOH reduction does not include reduction due to D/F limits met. D/F reduction is negligible compared to overall TOH reductions3 - Shintech Plaquemine data flagged as outlier. Concentrations for all HAP compounds have been set equal to those of Shintech Addis. Shintech Addis and Shintech Plaquemine share nearly idenitcal PVC production processes.Attachment ACompany FacilityCertainTeed Lake CharlesFormosa Delaware CityPolyOne HenryPolyOne PedricktownWestlake Calvert CityFormosa Point Comfort-PVC UnitWestlake GeismarOxyVinyls Deer ParkGeorgia Gulf PlaquemineFormosa Baton RougeDow MidlandShintech FreeportShintech AddisOxyVinyls PasadenaGeorgia Gulf AberdeenShintech PlaquemineTotalBulkDispersionOtherNotes1 - HCl reduction does not include actual reduction from VC condenser. HCl is only calculated to meet the HCl limit.2 - TOH reduction does not include reduction due to D/F limits met. D/F reduction is negligible compared to overall TOH reductions3 - Shintech Plaquemine data flagged as outlier. Concentrations for all HAP compounds have been set equal to those of Shintech Addis. Shintech Addis and Shintech Plaquemine share nearly idenitcal PVC production processes.DF TEQ ReductionNeeded %TOH ReductionNeeded %VC (ppmvd @3% O2)VC Limit(ppmvd@ 3%O2)VC Reduced(PPMVD @3% O2)VC Baseline(tpy)VC aftermeeting limit(tpy)Total VCReduced(tpy)HCl (ppmvd @3% O2)HCl LimitHCl Baseline(tpy)HCl AfterMeeting Limit(tpy)Total TonsReduced / yr0.2610.8425.24 3.20E-01 4.92 5.84E-02 3.57E-03 5.49E-02 104.12 2000.00 6.77E-01 6.77E-01 0.00E+000.25 3.20E-01 0.00 4.88E-03 4.88E-03 0.00E+00 121.33 2000.00 1.41E+00 1.41E+00 0.00E+000.998772.18 3.20E-01 1.86 1.12E-04 1.65E-05 9.55E-05 0.53 2000.00 1.59E-05 1.59E-05 0.00E+000.99952.66 3.20E-01 2.34 2.05E-05 2.47E-06 1.81E-05 1.32 2000.00 5.94E-06 5.94E-06 0.00E+001.29E-05 3.20E-01 0.00 2.87E-07 2.87E-07 0.00E+00 0.25 2000.00 3.27E-03 3.27E-03 0.00E+000.9751.86E-04 3.20E-01 0.00 1.13E-05 1.13E-05 0.00E+00 0.28 2000.00 1.00E-02 1.00E-02 0.00E+000.2117.31E-04 3.20E-01 0.00 3.71E-04 3.71E-04 0.00E+00 0.41 2000.00 1.20E-01 1.20E-01 0.00E+001.08E-03 3.20E-01 0.00 4.38E-04 4.38E-04 0.00E+00 NR 2000.00 NRNRNR0.5102.35E-03 3.20E-01 0.00 6.52E-04 6.52E-04 0.00E+00 184.26 2000.00 2.98E+01 2.98E+01 0.00E+000.3013.31E-03 3.20E-01 0.00 3.57E-04 3.57E-04 0.00E+00 10.88 2000.00 6.85E-01 6.85E-01 0.00E+004.51E-03 3.20E-01 0.00 1.01E-04 1.01E-04 0.00E+00 NR 2000.00 NRNRNR0.01 3.20E-01 0.00 8.32E-05 8.32E-05 0.00E+00 0.12 2000.00 1.16E-03 1.16E-03 0.00E+000.24 3.20E-01 0.00 3.77E-03 3.77E-03 0.00E+00 0.08 2000.00 7.67E-04 7.67E-04 0.00E+000.3300.97 3.20E-01 0.65 1.62E-02 5.34E-03 1.09E-02 359.74 2000.00 3.50E+00 3.50E+00 0.00E+000.1472.00 3.20E-01 1.68 2.27E-02 3.63E-03 1.91E-02 156.78 2000.00 1.04E+00 1.04E+00 0.00E+000.24 3.20E-01 0.00 6.27E-02 6.27E-02 0.00E+00 0.08 2000.00 1.27E-02 1.27E-02 0.00E+000.170.0837.250.000.05840.05490.6772-0.00500.00011.4111-0.10740.030035.1603-3 - Shintech Plaquemine data flagged as outlier. Concentrations for all HAP compounds have been set equal to those of Shintech Addis. Shintech Addis and Shintech Plaquemine share nearly idenitcal PVC production processes.Attachment ACompany FacilityCertainTeed Lake CharlesFormosa Delaware CityPolyOne HenryPolyOne PedricktownWestlake Calvert CityFormosa Point Comfort-PVC UnitWestlake GeismarOxyVinyls Deer ParkGeorgia Gulf PlaquemineFormosa Baton RougeDow MidlandShintech FreeportShintech AddisOxyVinyls PasadenaGeorgia Gulf AberdeenShintech PlaquemineTotalBulkDispersionOtherNotes1 - HCl reduction does not include actual reduction from VC condenser. HCl is only calculated to meet the HCl limit.2 - TOH reduction does not include reduction due to D/F limits met. D/F reduction is negligible compared to overall TOH reductions3 - Shintech Plaquemine data flagged as outlier. Concentrations for all HAP compounds have been set equal to those of Shintech Addis. Shintech Addis and Shintech Plaquemine share nearly idenitcal PVC production processes.Dioxin / Furans(TMB)ng/dscm @3%O2DF TMB Limit(TMB)ng/dscm @ 3%O2DF TMB Baseline(TPY)DF Tmb AfterMeeting Limit (tpy)DF TMB Reduction(TPY)Dioxin / Furans(TEQ)ng/dscm @3%O2DF TEQ Limit(TEQ)ng/dscm @ 3%O2DF TEQ Baseline(TPY)DF TEQ AfterMeeting Limit (tpy)DF TEQ Reduction(TPY)0.660.202.81E-098.49E-101.96E-090.030.0231.32E-109.76E-113.44E-110.040.203.01E-103.01E-100.00E+000.00270.0232.05E-112.05E-110.00E+00NR0.20NRNRNRNR0.023NRNRNRNR0.20NRNRNRNR0.023NRNRNR0.070.206.30E-106.30E-100.00E+000.009210.0237.77E-117.77E-110.00E+0016.180.203.73E-074.61E-093.69E-070.907750.0232.09E-085.31E-102.04E-080.570.201.10E-073.86E-087.19E-080.029140.0235.62E-094.44E-091.18E-090.080.201.18E-081.18E-080.00E+000.005060.0237.80E-107.80E-100.00E+006.360.206.71E-072.11E-086.49E-070.046900.0234.95E-092.43E-092.52E-090.200.208.32E-098.21E-091.05E-100.032900.0231.35E-099.44E-104.06E-100.020.201.66E-101.66E-100.00E+000.001680.0231.44E-111.44E-110.00E+000.070.204.50E-104.50E-100.00E+000.011590.0237.34E-117.34E-110.00E+000.080.204.44E-104.44E-100.00E+000.017310.0231.02E-101.02E-100.00E+000.130.207.97E-107.97E-100.00E+000.007760.0234.93E-114.93E-110.00E+000.040.201.74E-101.74E-100.00E+000.004720.0232.04E-112.04E-110.00E+000.080.207.38E-097.38E-090.00E+000.017310.0231.70E-091.70E-090.00E+001.19E-061.09E-063.58E-082.46E-082.81E-091.96E-091.32E-103.44E-113.01E-100.00E+002.05E-110.00E+001.18E-061.09E-063.57E-082.45E-08Attachment ACompany FacilityCertainTeed Lake CharlesFormosa Delaware CityPolyOne HenryPolyOne PedricktownWestlake Calvert CityFormosa Point Comfort-PVC UnitWestlake GeismarOxyVinyls Deer ParkGeorgia Gulf PlaquemineFormosa Baton RougeDow MidlandShintech FreeportShintech AddisOxyVinyls PasadenaGeorgia Gulf AberdeenShintech PlaquemineTotalBulkDispersionOtherNotes1 - HCl reduction does not include actual reduction from VC condenser. HCl is only calculated to meet the HCl limit.2 - TOH reduction does not include reduction due to D/F limits met. D/F reduction is negligible compared to overall TOH reductions3 - Shintech Plaquemine data flagged as outlier. Concentrations for all HAP compounds have been set equal to those of Shintech Addis. Shintech Addis and Shintech Plaquemine share nearly idenitcal PVC production processes.TOH(ppmvd @3% O2)TOHLimitTOH %ReductionFromBaselineTOH baseline (tpy) (w/o anyother HAP Reduction)TOH BaselineAfter VCReduction%ReductionAchieved byVC ReduxRemaining %ReductionTOH AfterRemainingReduction (TPY)TOHReduction(TPY)75.98 12 0.8420567721.091.040.05 0.790.220.878432.86 1200.050.050.00 0.000.050.000009724.20 12 0.9987659650.910.910.00 1.000.000.9126225173.20 12 0.9995233030.350.350.00 1.000.000.354516.43 1200.100.100.00 0.000.100.000001.14 1200.050.050.00 0.000.050.000004.31 1201.631.630.00 0.001.630.000003.51 1201.151.150.00 0.001.150.000001.73 1200.310.310.00 0.000.310.000003.26 1200.210.210.00 0.000.210.000000.34 1200.010.010.00 0.000.010.000000.22 1200.000.000.00 0.000.000.0000011.89 1200.260.260.00 0.000.260.0000017.90 12 0.3297744550.280.270.04 0.290.190.0896714.07 12 0.1473390190.200.190.09 0.050.180.0291111.89 1204.354.350.00 0.004.350.0000010.982.261.09480.87841.31921.26718.56890.1188

### Attachment B

Analysis of Baseline Emissions from Residual HAP in ResinMACT Floor for Residual HAP in Stripped Resin, Dispersion and Other Processes (Excluding Bulk) SubcategoriesExistingNewExistingNewAverage of Top Five (ppmw)7.17.1167.3 167.399% UPL(ppmw)NANANA NA3xDLNANANA NAMACT Floor Limit (ppmw)7.17.1167.3 167.3Average of Top Five (ppmw)4828105 4399% UPL(ppmw)5540100 583xDLNANANANAMACT Floor Limit (ppmw)5540100 58Average of Top Five (ppmw)0.4350.15125 2199% UPL(ppmw)0.4710.19128 253xDL0.0840.06976 42MACT Floor Limit (ppmw)0.4710.19176 42ppmwppmwVinyl Chloride Total Organic HAP BothVinyl ChlorideTotal Organic HAP Vinyl Chloride Total Organic HAP Vinyl Chloride Total Organic HAPCertain Teed - Lake Charles - BulkBulkFormosa - Delaware City - Dispersion Dispersion67.4214NoNoNo 114 Sampling Data504.518.753.1560.61,778.218.959.9PolyOne - Henry - DispersionDispersion42.842.8 YesYesYes 114 Sampling Data384NANA426.7426.79.19.1PolyOne - Pedricktown - DispersionDispersion28.543.1 YesYesYes114 Sampling Data625NANA694.51,051.59.915.0Dow - Midland - SuspensionSuspension7.1695 NoNoNo 114 Survey Response, Max Conc124993.420.2277.63,688.15.066.0Formosa - Baton Rouge - Suspension Suspension0.59140 NoYesNo 114 Sampling Data356220.4NA791.653,556.51.279.1Formosa - Point Comfort - Suspension Suspension0.15119 YesYesYes114 Sampling Data2502NANA556.170,537.50.226.6Georgia Gulf - Aberdeen - Suspension Suspension18.7237 NoNoNo 114 Sampling Data121197.567.9269.13,407.812.6159.4Georgia Gulf - Plaquemine - Suspension Suspension21.4241 NoNoNo 114 Sampling Data586797.868.51,303.814,697.969.7786.0OxyVinyls - Deer Park - SuspensionSuspension0.19912 YesYesYes114 Sampling Data2177NANA483.828,978.90.214.4OxyVinyls - Pasadena - SuspensionSuspension2.8377 NoNoNo 114 Sampling Data566883.41.51,259.634,319.68.9242.9OxyVinyls - Pedricktown - Suspension Suspension2.5239 NoYesNo 114 Sampling Data112081.3NA248.93,899.91.624.5Shintech - Addis - SuspensionSuspension0.669 NoYesNo 114 Survey Response, Max Conc290718.7NA646.077,343.40.9112.0Shintech - Freeport - SuspensionSuspension0.77269 NoYesNo see comment143839.0NA319.628,356.00.654.7Shintech - Plaquemine - Suspension Suspension0.5469 NoYesNo see comment147612.8NA328.041,892.70.456.6Westlake - Calvert City - Suspension Suspension29.38258 NoNoNo 114 Sampling Data142298.470.5316.02,772.423.2203.6Westlake - Geismar - SuspensionSuspension8.2611 NoYesNo 114 Sampling Data193094.3NA428.9593.38.912.3`Dispersion1,6823,2563884Other7,229364,0441331,838TOTAL8,911367,3001711,922Company, Facility, and Resin Type Resin TypeVinyl ChloridePercent Reduction Required to Meet Part 63 LimitFlow Rate, Max(liters/min)Data SourceTotal Organic HAPCan Meet Limit?BulkTotal Organic HAPBaseline Emissions, tons/yrVinyl ChloridePart 61Part 63DispersionOtherBaseline Emissions, tons/yr

### Attachment C

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Storage TanksBaseline Emissions Analysis for Storage TanksTotal VOC Total Organic HAP Vinyl ChlorideTotal VOC Total Organic HAP Vinyl ChlorideCertainTeed Lake Charles B 0.2 0.20.200.200.00FormosaDelaware City D705.6705.6705.60705.600.00PolyOneHenryD705.60705.600.00PolyOnePedricktown D705.60705.600.00DowMidlandS0000.000.000.00Dow (Union Carbide) Texas CitySL720720720.00720.00672.27FormosaBaton Rouge S2007.632435.992007.632435.99672.27FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC S0000.000.000.00Georgia Gulf AberdeenS1016.92984.84672.27Georgia Gulf Plaquemine S1016.92984.84672.27OxyVinylsDeer ParkS1016.92984.84672.27OxyVinylsPasadenaS1016.92984.84672.27OxyVinylsPedricktown S1016.92984.84672.27ShintechAddisS2583212317972583.002123.001797.00ShintechFreeportS1313.71403.181313.71403.18672.27ShintechPlaquemine S420.4180.4180.4420.40180.40180.40WestlakeCalvert City S0.09600.100.00672.27WestlakeGeismarS73.5946.4539.473.5946.4539.40Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yrTotals in Tons per YearBulk0.20.20.0Bulk0.00010.00010.000000Dispersion705.6705.60.0Dispersion1.061.060.000000All Other1016.9984.8672.3All Other5.745.063.70TOTAL6.806.123.70* PolyOne - Henry included in dispersion category.** Average of reported emissions grater than zero for each category applied to facilities in that category that didnot report emissions.*** Certain Teed did not report a value for Vinyl Chloride - Since there are no other bulk facilities, a value of zerowas assumedCompanyFacility ProcessReported Emissions, lb/yrBaseline Emissions, lb/yr

### Attachment D

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Heat Exchange SystemsCOOLING TOWERS - BASELINE EMISSIONS ANALYSISCompanyNameFacilityNameProcessNum ofCTsCT IDTotal Flow,gpmlbwater/yrVinyl Chloride Other VOC Vinyl Chloride Other VOCVinyl Chloride(tpy)Other VOC(tpy)VC+OtherVOC (tpy)CertainTeedLake CharlesB1U-13102004.29E+100.02670.14880.13590.75880.8947CertainTeedLake CharlesB1U-1950002.10E+100.02670.14880.06660.37200.4386FormosaBaton RougeS1U-1021759.14E+090.02670.14880.02900.16180.1908FormosaDelaware CityD1U-1440001.68E+100.02670.14880.05330.29760.3509FormosaDelaware CityD1U-7340001.68E+100.02670.14880.05330.29760.3509FormosaPoint Comfort - PVCS1U-241587006.67E+110.02670.14882.114711.806213.9209FormosaPoint Comfort - Specialty Polyvinyl Chloride (SPVC) UnitS, O1U-170.0000Georgia GulfAberdeenS1U-6620008.41E+090.02670.14880.02670.14880.1754Georgia GulfAberdeenS1U-6720008.41E+090.02670.14880.02670.14880.1754Georgia GulfAberdeenS1U-6820008.41E+090.02670.14880.02670.14880.1754Georgia GulfAberdeenS1U-6920008.41E+090.02670.14880.02670.14880.1754Georgia GulfPlaquemineS1unknown - assume 2 CTs400001.68E+110.02670.14880.53302.97573.5087Georgia GulfPlaquemineS1unknown - assume 2 CTs223009.37E+100.02670.14880.29721.65901.9561OxyVinylsDeer ParkS1unknown - assume 3 CTs22009.25E+090.02670.14880.02930.16370.1930OxyVinylsDeer ParkS1unknown - assume 3 CTs22009.25E+090.02670.14880.02930.16370.1930OxyVinylsDeer ParkS1unknown - assume 3 CTs196008.24E+100.02670.14880.26121.45811.7193OxyVinylsPasadenaS1U-110390003.78E+101.88E+021.41E+030.02670.14880.11990.66950.7895OxyVinylsPasadenaS1U-1104116004.88E+103.61E+021.66E+030.02670.14880.15460.86301.0175OxyVinylsPedricktownS1U-600133335.60E+100.02670.14880.17770.99191.1696PolyOneHenryS, D1U-1390001.64E+110.02670.14880.51972.90133.4210PolyOnePedricktwonD1U-181004.20E+080.02670.14880.00130.00740.0088ShintechAddisS1U-624491.89E+090.02670.14880.00600.03340.0394Emission Factor, lbs/yr-gpm2008 Emissions, lbs/yrBaseline Emissions, tons/yrShintechAddisS1U-624491.89E+090.02670.14880.00600.03340.0394ShintechFreeportS1U-453601.51E+090.02670.14880.00480.02680.0316ShintechPlaquemineS1U-584331.82E+090.02670.14880.00580.03220.0380DowMidlandS1CTW-148002.02E+100.02670.14880.06400.35710.4210WestlakeCalvert CityS1U-89228009.58E+100.02670.14880.30381.69622.0000WestlakeGeismarS1U-40146506.16E+100.02670.14880.19521.08991.2851Bulk0.20251.13081.3333Dispersion0.62763.50394.1315Other4.432024.743229.1752TOTAL5.262129.377934.6400* PolyOne - Henry included in "Dispersion" category

### Attachment E

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Equipment LeaksAttachment E1 - Baseline Emissions Analysis for Equipment LeaksCompany FacilityLDAR ProgramType (by Survey)Facility TypeBaselineEmissions (TPY)[1]Certain TeedLake Charles40CFR61 V Bulk16.5FormosaBaton Rouge40CFR61 V Other59.29FormosaDelaware City40CFR63 UU Dispersion8.1FormosaPoint Comfort40CFR61 V Other59.29Georgia GulfAberdeen40CFR61 V Other59.29Georgia GulfPlaquemine40CFR63 UU Other8.1OxyVinylsDeer Park40CFR61 V Other59.29OxyVinylsPasadena40CFR61 V Other59.29OxyVinylsPedricktown40CFR61 V Other59.29PolyOneHenry40CFR61 V Other/Dispersion59.29PolyOnePedricktown40CFR61 V Dispersion59.29ShintechAddis40CFR61 V Other59.29ShintechFreeport40CFR63 UU Other8.1ShintechPlaquemine40CFR61 V Other59.29DowMidland40CFR61 V Other59.29WestlakeCalvert City40CFR61 V Other59.29WestlakeGeismar40CFR61 V Other59.29[1] 59.29 from "PVC_eqlk_baseline_er_estimate_102610" Worksheet "Using Protocol" For subpart V, medium/small complexity plant. 8.1 from Worksheet "factors-EPA sprdsht, emissions" US, Level 2,medium/small complexity plantAttachment E2 - Baseline Emissions Analysis for Equipment LeaksFactors from protocolsimple medium complexControlFactor ControlFactor Subpart V US, Level 2 Subpart V US, Level 2Pump Seals* Light-liquid service1540560.0199Monthly (10,000ppm)0.00617Monthly (1,000ppm)0.004882.281.810.860.680.480.18* Heavy-liquid service05360.00862none0.00862none0.008620.400.400.000.000.000.00Valves* Gas/vapor service774141,3790.00597Monthly (10,000ppm)0.00078Quarterly (500 ppm)0.000352.971.330.550.251.640.31* Light-liquid service3801,1791,9800.00403Monthly (10,000ppm)0.00084Quarterly (500 ppm)0.000389.164.142.951.335.021.62* Heavy-liquid service0711,2720.00023none0.00023none0.000230.150.150.000.000.000.00Connectors* Flanges - gas/vapor0.00183* Flanges - light liquid7312,6627,4100.00183None0.00180annual (500)0.0001344.333.2012.170.8841.1311.29* Flanges -heavy liquid0.00183Pressure Relief Devices* Disks245760.104no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00* Disk holders, valves,etc.245760.104no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Open-ended Valves331414240.0017no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Sampling Connections8351060.015no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Compressor Vent0280.228no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Total59.2911.0316.533.1448.2713.40Equipment counts from Subpart VV analysis provided by EPAEmissionreduction (simplecomplexity) (tpy)Type of ComponentNumber of ComponentsEmission Factors From Protocol (kg/hr/source)Emissions, mediumcomplexity (tpy)Emissionreduction(mediumcomplexity) (tpy)UncontrolledBaseline (subpart V)US, Level 2Emissions, simplecomplexity (tpy)Factors from "emissions" tab of EPA spreadsheet (A7:C11) or "final estimates" tabsimplemediumcomplexControlFactorControlFactorSubpart VUS, Level 2Subpart VUS, Level 2Pump Seals* Light-liquid service1540560.0199Monthly (10,000ppm)0.00251Monthly (1,000ppm)0.0006950.930.260.350.100.670.25* Heavy-liquid service05360.00862none0.00862none0.008620.400.400.000.000.000.00Valves* Gas/vapor service774141,3790.00597Monthly (10,000ppm)0.000352Quarterly (500 ppm)0.000201.350.780.250.140.570.11* Light-liquid service3801,1791,9800.00403Monthly (10,000ppm)0.00039Quarterly (500 ppm)0.000234.252.531.370.821.720.56* Heavy-liquid service0711,2720.00023none0.00023none0.000230.150.150.000.000.000.00Connectors* Flanges - gas/vapor0.00183* Flanges - light liquid7312,6627,4100.00183None0.00031annual (500)0.0001627.563.992.081.103.570.98* Flanges -heavy liquid0.00183Pressure Relief Devices* Disks245760.104no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00* Disk holders, valves,etc.245760.104no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Open-ended Valves331414240.0017no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Sampling Connections8351060.015no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Compressor Vent0280.228no leaks0no leaks00.000.000.000.000.000.00Total14.648.104.052.156.541.89Equipment counts from Subpart VV analysis provided by EPAEmissionreduction (simplecomplexity) (tpy)Type of ComponentNumber of ComponentsEmission Factors From Protocol (kg/hr/source)Emissions, mediumcomplexity (tpy)Emissionreduction(mediumUncontrolledBaseline (subpart V)US, Level 2Emissions, simplecomplexity (tpy)

### Attachment F

Baseline Emissions Analysis for Other Emission SourcesTotal VOC Vinyl Chloride MethanolTotal VOC Vinyl Chloride MethanolTotal OrganicHAPCertainTeedLake Charles BReactor Openings66.900.0066.900.0066.90DowMidlandS55.68101.190.88 102.08Dow (Union Carbide)Texas CitySLFilter Openings0.8855.68101.190.88 102.08FormosaBaton Rouge SFilter Openings102.63102.63102.63102.630.88 103.51FormosaBaton Rouge SReactor Openings86.1986.1986.1986.190.8887.07FormosaBaton Rouge SVessel Openings102.63102.63102.63102.630.88 103.51FormosaDeleware City DReactor Openings0.040.040.000.04FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSFilter Openings0.160.160.160.160.881.04FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSReactor Openings213.00213.00213.00213.000.88 213.88FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSStripping Column1.901.901.901.900.882.78FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitSVessel Openings9.969.969.969.960.8810.84Georgia GulfAberdeenSVessel Openings55.68101.190.88 102.08Georgia GulfPlaquemineSReactor Openings55.68101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSFilter Openings0.010.01101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSFoam Trap0.060.06101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSReactor Openings30.3030.30101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSStripping Column0.300.30101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSVessel Openings1.011.01101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsDeer ParkSWaste Water Stripper0.000.00101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPasadenaSCondensers0.190.19101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPasadenaSFilter Openings0.050.05101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPasadenaSReactor Openings8.238.23101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPasadenaSVessel Openings26.140.0126.140.010.880.89OxyVinylsPasadenaSWash Columns0.860.86101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPedricktown SFilter Openings55.68101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPedricktown SReactor Openings4.894.894.894.890.885.77OxyVinylsPedricktown SRecovery Separators55.68101.190.88 102.08OxyVinylsPedricktown SStripping Column4.894.894.894.890.885.77OxyVinylsPedricktown SVessel Openings55.68101.190.88 102.08PolyOneHenryS, DReactor Openings55.68101.190.88 102.08PolyOnePedricktown DReactor Openings 7694.28 549297.260.040.040.000.04PolyOnePedricktown DVessel Openings0.040.040.040.040.000.04ShintechAddisSReactor Openings13.2913.2913.2913.290.8814.17ShintechFreeportSReactor Openings390.4055.68390.400.88 391.28ShintechFreeportSStorage Sphere5.1155.685.110.885.99ShintechPlaquemineSReactor Openings500.00500.00500.00500.000.88 500.88WestlakeCalvert CitySReactor Openings177.50177.50177.50177.500.88 178.38WestlakeCalvert CitySStripping Column2.722.722.722.720.883.60WestlakeCalvert CitySVessel Openings0.000.000.000.000.880.88WestlakeGeismarSReactor Openings105.03105.03105.03105.030.88 105.91* Excluded: compressors, pumps, exchangers.Average of Reported Emissions >0 lb/yr** PolyOne included with dispersion.Bulk0.066.90.0Bulk0.0000.0330.0000.033*** Dow - Midland added; no emissions reported from equipment openings.Dispersion0.040.040.0Dispersion0.02790.05070.00040.0511All Other55.7101.20.88All Other0.9191.6700.0151.685Reported values from PolyOne - Pedricktown excluded.TOTAL0.9471.7540.0151.769Average value applied to PolyOne - Pedricktown0.9466FacilityCompanyTotal 2008 Emissions (lbs)ProcessEquipmentTotal 2008 Emissions (lbs)CompanyFacilityProcessVC(tpy)TOH(TPY)DataCertainTeed Lake Charles B 0.0335 0.0335Company Facility ProcessSum of VC (tpy)Sum of TOH (TPY)DowMidlandS0.0506 0.051CertainTeedLake CharlesB0.033450507 0.033450507Dow (Union Carbide)Texas CitySL 0.0506 0.051DowMidland S0.050597353 0.051037753Formosa Baton Rouge S 0.0513 0.0518FormosaBaton RougeS0.145725 0.1470462Formosa Baton Rouge S 0.0431 0.0435Deleware CityD0.0000179 0.0000179Formosa Baton Rouge S 0.0513 0.0518Point Comfort - PVC UnitS0.11251 0.1142716Formosa Deleware City D 2E-05 2E-05Georgia Gulf Aberdeen S0.050597353 0.051037753FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS 8E-05 0.0005PlaquemineS0.050597353 0.051037753FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS 0.1065 0.1069OxyVinyls Deer Park S 0.303584118 0.306226518FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS 0.001 0.0014Pasadena S 0.202394412 0.204596412FormosaPoint Comfort - PVC UnitS 0.005 0.0054PedricktownS0.156682059 0.158884059Georgia Gulf AberdeenS 0.0506 0.051PolyOneHenry S, D 0.050597353 0.051037753Georgia Gulf PlaquemineS 0.0506 0.051PedricktownD0.0000379 0.0000379OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051ShintechAddis S0.006645 0.0070854OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051Freeport S0.197755 0.1986358OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051PlaquemineS0.25 0.2504404OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051WestlakeCalvert CityS0.0901115 0.0914327OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051Geismar S0.052515 0.0529554OxyVinyls Deer ParkS 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls PasadenaS 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls PasadenaS 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls PasadenaS 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls PasadenaS 5E-06 0.0004OxyVinyls PasadenaS 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 0.0024 0.0029OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 0.0506 0.051OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 0.0024 0.0029OxyVinyls Pedricktown S 0.0506 0.051PolyOne HenryS, D 0.0506 0.051PolyOne Pedricktown D 2E-05 2E-05PolyOne Pedricktown D 2E-05 2E-05Shintech AddisS 0.0066 0.0071Shintech FreeportS 0.1952 0.1956Shintech FreeportS 0.0026 0.003Shintech PlaquemineS 0.25 0.2504Westlake Calvert CityS 0.0888 0.0892Westlake Calvert CityS 0.0014 0.0018Westlake Calvert CityS 2E-06 0.0004Westlake GeismarS 0.0525 0.053

### Attachment G

Baseline Emissions Analysis for WastewaterAttachment G-1. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Maintenance and Process Wastewater1. Stripper Outlet DataCompany & FacilityOriginating Equipment Total WW (GAL) AcetaldehydeEDCMeOHMIBKVCTOHAPCertain Teed Lake CharlesWaste Water Stripper36000.40.4Dow MidlandFormosa Baton RougeWastewater Stripping Columns 137030400.30.140.44Formosa DelawareFormosa Point ComfortOxyVinyls Deer ParkWaste Water Stripper0.0180.0650.083OxyVinyls PasadenaWaste Water Preheater E-422 640000000.040.04OxyVinyls PedricktownPolyOne HenryWaste Water Stripper Column 49536001.41.4PolyOne PedricktownWaste Water Stripping Column 2471011.463157895 1.463157895Shintech AddisWaste Water Stripper14839200400.260.00640.266Shintech FreeportHEAT EXCHANGER27000000390.2590.00639.265Shintech PlaquemineWaste Water Stripper3801600400.30.0140.31Westlake Calvert CityWater Stripper Col Feed Heat Exch 289080002.260.052.31Westlake GeismarPVC Plant Waste Water Stripper 13225138.431.7231.723Georgia Gulf AberdeenWaste Water strippers105840000.70.7Georgia Gulf PlaquemineWaste Water Stripper11Avg Conc (PPMW)0.549.95Stripper Outlet Wastewater Baseline EstimationCompany & FacilityResin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity2008 Stripper WW(Gal)2008 Stripper Outlet(Gals)/Lb of Resin2008 StripperOutlet (Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)% Reduction of VCConc Needed tomeet MACT floorlimitTOHAP ConcW/ Avg forNon-Report(PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTOHAP(Tons/YR)VCReduction(Tons PerYear)Certain Teed Lake CharlesBulk447,348,640No480,607,1603600.008.05E-063,6000.4073% 0.406.01E-06 6.01E-06 4.36E-06Dow MidlandOther21,600,000No677,2730.5480% 9.951.52E-03 2.81E-02 1.21E-03Formosa Baton RougeOtherYes917,121,92013703040.0013,703,0400.1421% 0.448.01E-03 2.52E-02 1.72E-03Formosa DelawareDispersionYes143,300,3004,493,2140.5480% 9.951.01E-02 1.87E-01 8.04E-03Formosa Point ComfortOtherYes1,565,280,20049,079,7230.5480% 9.951.10E-01 2.04E+00 8.78E-02OxyVinyls Deer ParkOtherYes551,155,00017,281,5930.07-0.084.69E-03 5.99E-03 0.00E+00OxyVinyls PasadenaOtherYes2,101,002,86064000000.0064,000,0000.04-0.041.07E-02 1.07E-02 0.00E+00OxyVinyls PedricktownOther350,534,58010,991,0930.5480% 9.952.47E-02 4.57E-01 1.97E-02PolyOne HenryOther/Dispersion76,007,292No125,663,3404953600.006.52E-02 4,953,6001.4092% 1.402.89E-02 2.89E-02 2.67E-02PolyOne PedricktownDispersion39,809,584No130,072,580247101.006.21E-03 247,1011.4692% 1.461.51E-03 1.51E-03 1.40E-03Shintech AddisOtherYes623,907,46014839200.0014,839,2000.01-40.273.72E-04 2.49E+00 0.00E+00Shintech FreeportOtherYes3,196,699,00027000000.0027,000,0000.01-39.276.76E-04 4.42E+00 0.00E+00Shintech PlaquemineOtherYes1,300,725,8003801600.003,801,6000.01-40.311.59E-04 6.39E-01 0.00E+00Westlake Calvert CityOther1,100,000,000No800,277,06028908000.002.63E-02 28,908,0000.05-2.316.03E-03 2.79E-01 0.00E+00Westlake GeismarOther476,390,000No573,201,20013225138.432.78E-02 13,225,1381.7294% 1.729.51E-02 9.51E-02 8.90E-02Georgia Gulf AberdeenOther1,000,897,48010584000.0010,584,0000.7084% 0.703.09E-02 3.09E-02 2.61E-02Georgia Gulf PlaquemineOther1,199,313,28037,604,7461.0089% 1.001.57E-01 1.57E-01 1.40E-01Average*3.14E-02Totals4.91E-01 1.09E+01 4.01E-01*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk processAverage of Avg Conc (ppmw)Attachment G-2. Baseline Emissions Analysis for Maintenance and Process WastewaterUnControlled DataDataFacilityNameSum of Total WW (GAL) Sum of VC2 Sum of TOHAP2Formosa Plastics Corporation Baton Rouge342048960 0.142731880.14273188Georgia Gulf Chemicals Aberdeen Facility2772000000Lake Charles Polymer Plant59616000 0.0006219210.000621921OxyVinyls Deer Park0OxyVinyls Pasadena462061144.201.439935448PolyOne Henry41253800 0.344291790.34429179Shintech Addis51112800 0.0079397442.500909276Shintech Freeport27000000 0.0006760024.423867165Shintech Plaquemine10022400 0.0027977450.622724265Union Carbide Texas City188575088044.31144614Westlake Calvert City6464880000.609679537Westlake Geismar110527230.7 0.0066663940.006666394Grand Total1384586223 0.50572547654.40287382Company & FacilityTotal WW (GAL) Tons VC Tons TOHAPVC Conc (PPMW) TOHAP Conc (PPMW)Formosa Baton Rouge342048960 0.142731880.142731880.10.1Georgia Gulf Aberdeen27720000000Certain Teed Lake Charles59616000 0.0006219210.0006219210.00250.0025OxyVinyls Deer ParkOxyVinyls Pasadena462061144.201.43993544800.746811268PolyOne Henry41253800 0.344291790.3442917922Shintech Addis51112800 0.0079397442.500909276 0.03722580611.7256129Shintech Freeport27000000 0.0006760024.4238671650.00639.265Shintech Plaquemine10022400 0.0027977450.622724265 0.06689655214.88988506Westlake Calvert City6464880000.60967953702.26Westlake Geismar110527230.7 0.0066663940.006666394 0.014454030.01445403Average0.227.10Company & FacilityResin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity2008 Uncontrolled WW(Gal)2008 UncontrolledFlow (Gals/Lb ofResin2008UncontrolledFlow (Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)TOHAP Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTOHAP(Tons/YR)Certain Teed Lake CharlesBulk447,348,640No480,607,16059616000.001.33E-01 59,616,0000.00250.0025 6.22E-04 6.22E-04Dow MidlandOther21,600,000No4,501,1310.222707639 7.100426326 4.18E-03 1.33E-01Formosa Baton RougeOtherYes917,121,920342048960.00342,048,9600.10.1 1.43E-01 1.43E-01Formosa DelawareDispersionYes143,300,30029,861,7290.222707639 7.100426326 2.78E-02 8.85E-01Formosa Point ComfortOtherYes1,565,280,200326,181,9680.222707639 7.100426326 3.03E-01 9.66E+00OxyVinyls Deer ParkOtherYes551,155,000114,852,8050.222707639 7.100426326 1.07E-01 3.40E+00OxyVinyls PasadenaOtherYes2,101,002,860462061144.24462,061,1440 0.746811268 0.00E+00 1.44E+00OxyVinyls PedricktownOther350,534,58073,046,3840.222707639 7.100426326 6.79E-02 2.16E+00PolyOne HenryOther/Dispersion76,007,292No125,663,34041253800.005.43E-01 41,253,80022 3.44E-01 3.44E-01PolyOne PedricktownDispersion39,809,584No130,072,5800.00E+00 8,295,7470.222707639 7.100426326 7.71E-03 2.46E-01Shintech AddisOtherYes623,907,46051112800.0051,112,8000.03722580611.7256129 7.94E-03 2.50E+00Shintech FreeportOtherYes3,196,699,00027000000.0027,000,0000.00639.265 6.76E-04 4.42E+00Shintech PlaquemineOtherYes1,300,725,80010022400.0010,022,4000.066896552 14.88988506 2.80E-03 6.23E-01Westlake Calvert CityOther1,100,000,000No800,277,06064648800.005.88E-02 64,648,80002.26 0.00E+00 6.10E-01Westlake GeismarOther476,390,000No573,201,200110527230.712.32E-01 110,527,2310.014454030.01445403 6.67E-03 6.67E-03Georgia Gulf AberdeenOther1,000,897,48027720000.0027,720,00000 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Georgia Gulf PlaquemineOther1,199,313,280249,919,7050.222707639 7.100426326 2.32E-01 7.40E+00Average*2.08E-011.26E+00 3.40E+01*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20in Bulk processAttachment G-3.Baseline Emissions Analysis for Maintenance and Process WastewaterMaintenance WastewaterCompany & FacilityTotal WW (GAL) VC Conc (PPMW) TOHAP Conc (PPMW)PolyOne Henry22,243,957.0022.000Shintech Freeport430,000.000.077 ` Excluded from average concentration factorWestlake Calvert City1,206,000.00Westlake Geismar852,000.002.252.2502.12502.125Company & FacilityResin Type2008 lbs ofResin2008 lb of Resin CBI? 2006 Capacity 2008 Main WW (Gal)2008 Maint Flow(Gals/Lb of Resin2008 MaintFlow (Gals/YR)VC Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PPMW)TOHAP Conc W/ Avgfor Non-Report(PMW)Baseline VC(Tons/YR)BaselineTOHAP(Tons/YR)Certain Teed Lake CharlesBulk447,348,640No480,607,16044,069,8622.132.13 3.91E-01 3.92E-01Dow MidlandOther21,600,000No2,127,8912.132.13 1.89E-02 1.89E-02Formosa Baton RougeOtherYes917,121,92090,348,8542.132.13 8.01E-01 8.03E-01Formosa DelawareDispersionYes143,300,30014,117,0082.132.13 1.25E-01 1.25E-01Formosa Point ComfortOtherYes1,565,280,200154,201,1682.132.13 1.37E+00 1.37E+00OxyVinyls Deer ParkOtherYes551,155,00054,296,1862.132.13 4.81E-01 4.83E-01OxyVinyls PasadenaOtherYes2,101,002,860206,977,0612.132.13 1.84E+00 1.84E+00OxyVinyls PedricktownOther350,534,58034,532,3742.132.13 3.06E-01 3.07E-01PolyOne HenryOther/Dispersion76,007,292No125,663,34022,243,957.002.93E-01 22,243,9572.002.000 1.86E-01 1.86E-01PolyOne PedricktownDispersion39,809,584No130,072,5803,921,7802.132.13 3.48E-02 3.49E-02Shintech AddisOtherYes623,907,46061,463,2832.132.13 5.45E-01 5.46E-01Shintech FreeportOtherYes3,196,699,000430,000.00430,0002.132.13 3.81E-03 3.82E-03Shintech PlaquemineOtherYes1,300,725,800128,138,9992.132.13 1.14E+00 1.14E+00Westlake Calvert CityOther1,100,000,000No800,277,0601,206,000.001.10E-03 1,206,0002.132.13 1.07E-02 1.07E-02Westlake GeismarOther476,390,000No573,201,200852,000.001.79E-03 852,0002.252.250 8.00E-03 8.00E-03Georgia Gulf AberdeenOther1,000,897,48098,601,8742.132.13 8.74E-01 8.76E-01Georgia Gulf PlaquemineOther1,199,313,280118,148,5012.132.13 1.05E+00 1.05E+00Average*9.85E-029.17E+00 9.19E+00*Average does not include CTLC due to absence of H20Stripper Outlet, Uncontrolled, and Maint. Wastewater Combinedin Bulk processCompany & FacilityResin TypeBaseline VC(Tons/YR)Baseline TOHAP(Tons/YR)VC Reduction (TonsPer Year)Certain Teed Lake CharlesBulk3.91E-013.92E-014.36E-06Dow MidlandOther2.46E-021.80E-011.21E-03Formosa Baton RougeOther9.52E-019.71E-011.72E-03Formosa DelawareDispersion1.63E-011.20E+008.04E-03Formosa Point ComfortOther1.78E+001.31E+018.78E-02OxyVinyls Deer ParkOther5.93E-013.89E+000.00E+00OxyVinyls PasadenaOther1.85E+003.29E+000.00E+00OxyVinyls PedricktownOther3.99E-012.93E+001.97E-02PolyOne HenryOther/Dispersion5.59E-015.59E-012.67E-02PolyOne PedricktownDispersion4.40E-022.82E-011.40E-03Shintech AddisOther5.53E-015.54E+000.00E+00Shintech FreeportOther5.16E-038.85E+000.00E+00Shintech PlaquemineOther1.14E+002.40E+000.00E+00Westlake Calvert CityOther1.67E-028.99E-010.00E+00Westlake GeismarOther1.10E-011.10E-018.90E-02Georgia Gulf AberdeenOther9.05E-019.07E-012.61E-02Georgia Gulf PlaquemineOther1.44E+008.61E+001.40E-011.09E+015.41E+014.01E-01Bulk3.91E-013.92E-014.36E-06Disp7.66E-012.04E+003.61E-02Other9.76E+005.17E+013.65E-01