alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                                                NEWS RELEASE

                                                [AAF-MCQUAY LOGO]

                                                Corporate Office
                                                215 Central Ave.
                                                Louisville, Kentucky  4028  USA



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

             MR. HO NYUK CHOY IS NEW PRESIDENT AND CEO OF AAF-MCQUAY
LOUISVILLE, KY. -- (NOVEMBER 4, 1999)-- Mr. Ho Nyuk Choy, Group Managing
Director of OYL Industries Berhad ("OYL"), will also assume active leadership
and direct management of AAF-McQuay Inc. (the Company) as President and Chief
Executive Officer, the Company announced today. He replaces Joseph B. Hunter,
who announced his intention to retire by the end of this calendar year. OYL
Industries is a major manufacturer of HVAC&R systems and products celebrating
its 25th anniversary this year. A wholly owned subsidiary of OYL, AAF-McQuay is
a leading manufacturer of air conditioning systems and air filtration products
primarily for commercial, industrial, and institutional customers.

Under Mr. Ho's leadership, OYL has grown more than 70% in the last four years,
despite Asia's economic difficulties. With a worldwide sales network spanning
more than 100 countries, OYL also has manufacturing facilities in 14 countries.

"The most immediate focus for McQuay is to continue to execute the strategy that
has recently been developed," said Mr. Ho. "Focus and follow-through are the
hallmarks of successful companies."


                                     -more-


<PAGE>

HO NEW PRESIDENT AND CEO...PAGE TWO



Mr. Ho will be relocating to the company's corporate headquarters in Louisville,
Kentucky in the month of November.

Mr. Hunter has been the president and chief executive officer of AAF-McQuay
since the purchase of the company by OYL Industries Bhd in May 1994. Under his
leadership, the company has experienced significant sales growth, developed its
worldwide presence through acquisition and joint venture partnerships, and
established new operating systems and procedures to better prepare the company
to meet its growth targets in a global environment. He will continue to
contribute to the company as a member of the Board of Directors.

AAF-McQuay has production facilities in nine countries with sales operations in
more than 80 countries. AAF-McQuay is a member of the Hong Leong Group Malaysia,
one of Malaysia's leading manufacturers and exporters of commercial and
industrial air conditioners, refrigerators, freezers, and electrical components.
The Company includes AAF International, McQuay International and J&E Hall.


                                      # # #


MEDIA INQUIRIES, PLEASE CONTACT:
Ben Schlinsog
McQuay International
(612) 553-5320
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-34156) of deltathree, Inc. (the "Company'),
our report, dated February 11, 2001, relating to our audit of the financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 1999 and 2000 and for the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000, contained in this Annual Report on Form
10-K

/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
Brightman Almagor & Co. (A member firm of Deloitte Touche)

Tel Aviv, Israel
March 30, 2001
#### DEL WEBB COMMUNITIES, INC.; PulteGroup, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Roger F. CARLSON; Mary Jo Carlson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17-1347

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 26, 2017

Decided: October 13, 2017

William Jefferson Leath, Jr., Michael S. Seekings, LEATH BOUCH & SEEK-INGS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Phillip Ward Seguí, Jr., SEGUI' LAW FIRM, PC, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, for Appellants. Robert L. Widener, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; A. Victor Rawl, Jr., Henry W. Frampton, IV, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger and Mary Jo Carlson (“Carl-sons”) appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Del Webb Communities, Inc., and its parent company, PuIteGroup (together “Pulte”). We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Pulte de novo. *Choice Hotels Int’l, Inc. v. Shiv Hosp., LLC,*491 F.3d 171, 176 (4th Cir. 2007). We have considered the record and the Carlsons’ appellate arguments and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. *Del Webb*v. *Carlson,*No. 9:14-cv-01877-PMD, 2017 WL 1050139 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Yakov Albaz and AA Top Success LLC d/b/a Crossland Van

Lines and Storage

,

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00804

- CV, 01

- 17

- 00910

- CV, & 01

- 17

- 00911

- CV

Trial court case number: 1080464 & 1080464

- 101

Trial court: County C ivil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

Party filing motion: The State of Texas

Yakov Albaz’s motion for rehearing is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3. Any pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Lloyd, and Caughey

.

Date: December 20 , 2018
#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Aurelio, Respondent, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Appellants. In the Matter of Matthew M. Levy et al, Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Thomas J. Curran et al., Appellants, against S. Howard Cohen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents. Michael J. Kennedy et al., Constituting the Committee on Vacancies Appointed by the Judicial Convention for the First Judicial District of the Democratic Party, et al., Appellants.

Argued September 27, 1943;

decided September 27, 1943.

*646
      *Ignatius M. Wilkinson, Corporation Counsel (Paxton Blair*and *James Hall Prothero*of counsel), for Board of Elections of the City of New York, appellants.

*Charles H. Tuttle*for George Frankenthaler, appellant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz*and *Alfred J. Bohlinger*for Thomas J. Curran et al., appellants.

*Andrew M. Lawler*and *Harold P. Spivak*for the Democratic Party, appellant.

*Leo J. Rosett*and *Harold P. Spivak for*Matthew M. Levy, appellant.

*Robert H. Elder*and *Otho S. Bowling*for Thomas A. Aurelio, respondent.

*Anthony J. Graziano*for William Lauricella et al., object ants, respondents.

Orders affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
#### CAIQIN LI, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-72708

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted October 6, 2017 * Pasadena, California

Filed October 16, 2017

Michael A. Rohr, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Michael A. Rohr, West Covina, CA, for Petitioner

Nicole N. Murley, Attorney, OIL, Daniel Eric Goldman, Esquire, Senior Litigation Counsel, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: KLEINFELD, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Li seeks review of a BIA order denying her claims for asylum and withholding of removal; the BIA decided Li did not meaningfully appeal the denial of her CAT claim, and she does not challenge that ruling on appeal to our court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny Li’s petition for review.

“We review factual findings of the IJ and BIA under the substantial evidence standard. That is, we must sustain factual findings if supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence in the record.” Mel*konian v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Under the REAL ID Act, the IJ’s credibility determination is based on “the totality of the circumstances, and all relevant factors,” which may include the inherent plausibility of the applicant’s account, the consistency between her written and oral statements, the internal consistency of her statements, and any inaccuracies or falsehoods in these statements. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii).

The IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence. For example, the IJ pointed to several inconsistencies in the record including Li stating a fact in a supplemental written application and then contradicting the fact while being questioned by her own attorney. Without credible testimony or other evidence supporting her claim, Li has not shown that she is entitled to asylum or withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,876
<INVENTORY>                                     22,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,003
<PP&E>                                         240,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,274
<BONDS>                                         92,363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,533
<SALES>                                        196,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,232
<CGS>                                          165,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  188,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,891)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (493)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (493)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STERLING
COMMERCE, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          79,060
<SECURITIES>                                    11,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,977
<PP&E>                                          77,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 259,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,184
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           750
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   259,887
<SALES>                                         74,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,769
<CGS>                                           15,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,060
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (the Authority), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Authority for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Authority.



/s/    MITCHELL GROSSINGER
ETESSMitchell Grossinger EtessChief Executive Officer, Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityAugust 13, 2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Authority and will be retained by the Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Emma Lorena BONILLA DE IBARRA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-73606

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 20, 2017 San Francisco, California

Filed May 02, 2017

Tiffany Joana Gates, Attorney, Law Offices of Tiffany J. Gates, Santa Rosa, CA, Stephen Tollafield, Assistant Director, Hastings College of the Law, University of California, Gary A. Watt, Esquire, Attorney, Hanson Bridgett LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner

William Clark Minick, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and STAFFORD,** District Judge.

**

 The Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Emma Lorena Bonilla de Ibarra (“Bonilla de Ibarra”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) denial of her claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We deny the petition.

Bonilla de Ibarra argues that she qualified for asylum and withholding of removal due to persecution on the basis of her membership in two separate particular social groups: the social group of women married to police officers and the social group of married women unable to leave their relationships.

1. Assuming there is a cognizable social group of women married to police officers of which Bonilla de Ibarra is a member, Bonilla de Ibarra cannot establish she suffered past persecution. Bonilla de Ibarra alleges that she was verbally threatened by gang members and that her house was once burglarized by gang members. This does not rise to the level of a finding of persecution we can recognize. *See Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 969 (9th Cir. 1998).

2. Assuming that Bonilla de Ibarra’s mistreatment by her husband would have amounted to persecution, Bonilla de Ibarra cannot establish that she was a member of a particular social group of women unable to leave their relationships. Bonilla de Ibarra testified that she moved out of her husband’s home, that her husband would grant her a divorce, and that she could *517relocate within El Salvador. The evidence does not compel a finding that Bonilla de Ibarra was unable to leave her marriage.

The petition is DENIED,

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6511 

To prohibit the United States from soliciting or accepting funds from United 

States citizens or lawful permanent residents of the United States as 

a condition of their repatriation from Israel and other nations during 

the period of evacuation, as a result of the Hamas terrorist attacks, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Ms. WILSON of Florida (for herself and Mr. GIMENEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the United States from soliciting or accepting 

funds from United States citizens or lawful permanent 

residents of the United States as a condition of their 

repatriation from Israel and other nations during the 

period of evacuation, as a result of the Hamas terrorist 

attacks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justifiable Use of 

5 Money for Peace Act’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6511 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SOLICITATION OF REIMBURSE2 MENT. 

3 Notwithstanding subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii) of section 4 

4 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 

5 (22 U.S.C. 2671), during the period of evacuation from 

6 Israel as a result of the Hamas terror attacks— 

7 (1) the Secretary of State shall waive any ex8 pectation of repayment of any travel expenses in9 curred by the Department of State on behalf of any 

10 United States citizen or lawful permanent resident 

11 evacuated from Israel and repatriated to the United 

12 States as a result of the Hamas terror attacks; 

13 (2) any promissory note or other obligation to 

14 repay an emergency repatriation loan signed by a 

15 United States citizen or a lawful permanent resident 

16 of the United States to reimburse the Department of 

17 State for travel expenses described in paragraph (1) 

18 shall be null and void; and 

19 (3) no Federal official or employee may solicit 

20 or accept any amount from any individual who is a 

21 citizen of the United States or a lawful permanent 

22 resident of the United States, whether in the form 

23 of a reimbursement or as any other condition of 

24 using transportation provided by the United States, 

25 to repatriate such individual to the United States. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Eric Wilton BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. FOX; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56756

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

Filed October 5, 2017

Eric Wilton Burton, Stockton, CA, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Eric Wilton Burton, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to pay the filing fee after denying Burton’s motion to proceed in for-ma pauperis (“IFP”) because he had three strikes under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

By failing to address in his opening brief how the district court erred, Burton has *520waived his challenge to the district court s determinations that Burton has three or more prior actions dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and that Burton has not alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See. Smith v.*Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); *Greenwood v. FAA,*28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim ....”); *see also*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.