alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Reeder *vs.*Anderson’s Administrators.

Assumpsit»

[Mr. Ilord for plaintiff: no appearance for defendants.]

From the Circuit Court eor Mason County.

*June*11.

When a man loses a piece of property, there is an implied request from him to every body else; to aid him in recovering it; and any one who finds and restores it, may recover of the owner, upon the implied assumpsit, at least an indemnity for his time and expenses-.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The only question to be considered in this case, is whether the law will imply a promise by the owner of a runaway slave, to pay a reasonable compensation to a stranger, for a voluntary apprehension and restitution of the fugitive. And, though such friendly offices are frequently those only of good neighborship, which should not be influenced by mercenary motives or expectations—nevertheless* it seems to us that,|£here is an implied request from the owner, to ail other persons to endeavor to secure to him lost property which he is anxious to retrievé; and that, therefore, there should be an implied undertaking to (at least) *indemnify*any person who shall, *by the expenditure of time*or *money,*contribute to a reclamation of the lost property.^

Whether, according to the proof, there was any such claim to reparation or indemnity in this case, is very doubtful: but, *because it is doubtful,*the Circuit Court erred in instructing the jury to find as in case of a non-suit.

And therefore, it is considered by the Court that, the judgment be reversed, the verdict set aside, and the cause remanded for a now trial.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 9, 2014

NO. 03-12-00678-CV

Darnell Delk, Appellant

v.

The Honorable Rosemary Lehmberg, District Attorney, and 

The Honorable Robert Perkins, Judge, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 26, 2012. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 11125 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Crystal Ann Reed,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23
- CR
- 129 - 3

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Ho,** and **Ramirez,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Crystal Ann Reed has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reed has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 4, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11125 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2024No. 23
- 11125

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-11125 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/04/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2006-SA4 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

   In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on information
   provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  Branch  Banking and
   Trust  Company of  Virginia,  PHH  Mortgage  Corporation,  Provident  Funding
   Associates, LP and U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
<PAGE>   1
                                 Exhibit 11.1


                       DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC.

             STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                      For periods ending December 31, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                    ------------       -----------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>
Common shares outstanding
 at the beginning of the period                       3,959,528          3,920,700

Net effect of shares granted for
 options exercised during the
 period                                                      50             19,612
                                                     ----------        -----------

Total                                                 3,959,578          3,940,312
                                                     ==========        ===========

Net income (loss) applicable to
common stockholders                                   ($667,000)       ($1,344,000)
                                                    ===========       ============


Net income (loss) per share applicable
to common stockholders                                   ($0.17)            ($0.34)
                                                     ==========        ===========
</TABLE>


                                    Page 17
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: June 22, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: 06 /2 2 /15 Phone Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants with NRDC **SUMMARY** On June 22, 2015, Ben Longstreth of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) call to discuss legal issues concerning the Clean Power Plan proposal for e xisting p ower p lants .
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 40 0 . KI ERA SHANI CE GRAHAM v

. THE STATE.

Ki era Sh an i ce G rah am p l ed g u i l t y t o m u lt i pl e o ffen s es , i n c l u d i n g fel o ny

m u rd er. Su b seq uen t l y , Grah am fi l ed a m o t i on t o wi t h draw h er g u i l t y p l ea. Th e t ri al

co u rt d en i ed Grah am ’ s m o t i o n, an d s h e fi l ed t h is di rect ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

In S t a t e v. Mu r r a

y , 2 86 G a. 2 5 8 (6 8 7 SE2 d 7 9 0 ) ( 2 0 09 ), t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

h el d th at “ [i ] f th e u n d erl y i ng act i o n i s a m u rd er cas e, t h i s Co urt h as j u ri s d i ct i o n o f t h e

ap p eal

, reg ard l es s o f wh et h er t h e ord er b ei n g ap p eal ed i s b as ed on fact s h av i n g s o m e

b eari n g o n t h e u n d erl y in g cri m i n al t ri al .” Id

. at 2 5 9 (1 ). See al s o Nea l v. S t a t e , 2 9 0

Ga. 5 63

, 57 2 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 65 ) (2 0 1 2 ) (Hu ns t ei n , C. J

., co ncu rri n g ); S t a t e v. Th o r n t o n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4 (3 2 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 9 8 4) ( d i r e c t in g th i s Co u rt t o t ran sfer “ al l cas es in

wh i ch ei t h er a sen ten ce o f d eat h o r o f li fe im p ri so n m en t h as b een im

p o s ed u p o n

co n vi ct i o n o f m

u rd er, an d al l p re-co n v i ct i o n ap p eal s i n m u rd er cas es

. . . .”).

Acco rd in g ly

, t h i s ap p ea l i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o th e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r

d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/13/2016 April 13, 2016
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6912 

To direct the Librarian of Congress to obtain a stained glass panel depicting 

the seal of the District of Columbia and install the panel among the 

stained glass panels depicting the seals of States, which overlook the 

Main Reading Room of the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2024 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Librarian of Congress to obtain a stained 

glass panel depicting the seal of the District of Columbia 

and install the panel among the stained glass panels 

depicting the seals of States, which overlook the Main 

Reading Room of the Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

2 

•HR 6912 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCLUDING STAINED GLASS PANEL DEPICTING 

2 SEAL OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN LIBRARY 

3 OF CONGRESS THOMAS JEFFERSON BUILD4 ING. 

5 The Librarian of Congress shall obtain a stained 

6 glass panel depicting the seal of the District of Columbia 

7 and install the panel among the panels depicting the seals 

8 of States, which overlook the Main Reading Room of the 

9 Library of Congress Thomas Jefferson Building. 

Æ
#### Elizabeth W. WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-2315

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 2017

Decided: July 11, 2017

Samuel F. Furgiuele, Jr., Boone, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, United States Attorney, Gill P. Beck, Katherine T. Armstrong, Assistant United States Attorneys, Christian M. Vai-nieri, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth W. Williamson appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of Williamson’s application for disability benefits. Our review of the Commissioner’s determination is limit*739ed to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was applied. *Mascio v. Colvin,*780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir. 2015). “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as - adequate to support a conclusion.” *Johnson v. Barnhart,*434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). We do not reweigh evidence or make credibility determinations in evaluating whether a decision is supported by substantial evidence; “[wjhere conflicting evidence allows reasonable minds to differ as to whether a claimant is disabled,” we defer to the Commissioner’s decision. *Id.*(internal quotation marks omitted).

Against this framework, we have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Williamson v. Berryhill,*No. 5:15-cv-00070-GCM (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of GSC Investment Corp.
  /s/ Thomas V. InglesbyName:
    Thomas V. InglesbyChief Executive Officer/s/ Richard T. Allorto, Jr.Name:
    Richard T. Allorto, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
---

EXHIBIT 99.17

VIA EDGAR

|TO: | United States Securities and
      Exchange Commission
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                       
|Re: | Asanko Gold Inc. (the
      "Company")                
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                            
|    | Consent of Expert                                     

This consent is  provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F for the financial  year ended December 31, 2016, and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”),  as filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange  Commission.  The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other  things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended  December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Information Form”), and the Management’s  Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “MD&A”).

I, Frederik  Fourie, Senior Mine Engineer for the Company, DO HEREBY CONSENT, to:

- the use of my name and the  disclosure of me as the person responsible for verifying of certain scientific  and technical information contained in the Annual Information Form in respect  of the Asanko Gold Mine;
- the use of my name and the disclosure of me as the  person responsible for verifying of certain scientific and technical  information contained in the MD&A in respect of the Asanko Gold Mine; and
- the inclusion and incorporation by reference of such  information in the Annual Report.



Dated March 15, 2017



|/s/ Frederik Fourie     | 
|----------------------- | 
|Frederik  FouriePr.Eng. | 

---
#### In the Matter of New York State Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, against George B. Wheeler, Inc., Respondent. In the Matter of The People of the State of New York ex rel New York State Labor Relations Board, Respondent, against George B. Wheeler, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Argued June 18, 1943;

decided July 20, 1943.

*564
      *Howard C. Campbell*and *E. Crosby Kindleberger*for appellants.

*William E. Grady, Jr., George G. Gallants*and *Daniel Kornblum*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.
Exhibit 10.2 - BIG 2012 NQSO






Exhibit 10.2
BIG LOTS 2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT


	
						
	Participant:
	 
	 
	Number of Shares:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Grant Date:
	 
	 
	Exercise Price:
	 
	 








In accordance with the terms of the Big Lots 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as may be amended (“Plan”), this Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the Grant Date by and between you, the Participant, and the Company in connection with the Company's grant of the right to purchase, at the option of the Participant, at the Exercise Price (“Option”) an aggregate of the number of Shares of the Company.  The Option is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.  To ensure that you fully understand the terms and conditions of this Award, you should carefully read the Plan and this Agreement.


Nature of Grant


The Option is a Non-Qualified Stock Option (“NQSO”) and, as such, is not an Incentive Stock Option (“ISO”) within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


Exercisability of Option


The Option will become vested and exercisable in increments according to the vesting schedule.  However, if an Acceleration Event occurs before the latest date in the vesting schedule, the then-remaining unvested portion of the Option will vest and become exercisable on the day on which the Acceleration Event occurred, but only if the Acceleration Event occurred at least six (6) months following the Grant Date (and such vesting shall be deemed to have occurred immediately prior to the Participant's Termination of Employment or Service).  “Acceleration Event” means the earlier of the Participant's death or Disability.  Except as provided in the Plan, the Option, to the extent that it is vested, may be exercised any time from the date it vests through the date that it expires.  Vesting is always subject to all other Plan requirements being satisfied.


	
			
	Shares
	Vesting Date
	Expiration Date

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 








Acceptance


The Participant hereby accepts the Option and acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, as in effect on the Grant Date.  By accepting the Option, the Participant agrees to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement, and the Participant agrees to accept as binding, conclusive and final all determinations, decisions and interpretations of the Committee upon any issues arising under the Plan and/or this Agreement.  The Participant also represents and warrants to the Company that he or she is aware of and agrees to be bound by the Company's insider trading policies and the applicable laws and regulations relating to the receipt, ownership and transfer of the Company's securities.


	
				
	Accepted as of _______________________, 20___
	 
	BIG LOTS, INC.
	 

	"Participant,"
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	_____________________________________
	 
	By: ______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                        11,591
<SECURITIES>                                  11,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24,604
<PP&E>                                         1,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,211
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           9
<OTHER-SE>                                    25,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28,383
<SALES>                                        8,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,459
<CGS>                                          5,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (6,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (6,056)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (6,056)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 ($0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 ($0.69)

         

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with this quarterly report of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"),
I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2005

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)