alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Willowbridge Strategic Trust
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0001005006
<NAME>              Willowbridge Strategic Trust
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          48,973,794

<SECURITIES>                    224,676

<RECEIVABLES>                   12,340

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                49,210,810

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,009,847

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      48,200,963

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    49,210,810

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,327,137

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,971,161

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,644,024)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (3.96)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### NET TALK.COM, INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAGICJACK VOCALTEC LTD., an Israel Limited Partnership, Magicjack Holdings Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, FKA YMAX Holdings Corporation, Magicjack LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, Defendants-appellants *942Michele Borislow, Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel Borislow, Defendant

2016-1683

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 6, 2017

Matthew Mcandrews, Niro McAndrews LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Kyle Wal-lenberg.

Darryl Michael Woo, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by Janice Ta, Stephen C. Stout, Austin, TX.

(Wallach, Taranto, and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
2003AQMP - 2010 STATIONARY BASELINE EMISSIONS WITH GROWH - SOX AND PM10 BY MAJOR SOURCE CATEGORY (T/D)

Road Dust

SOx PM10 SOx PM10 PM10 SOx PM10

010 Electric Utilities 0.29 0.99 0.29 0.99020 Cogeneration 0.01 0.67 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.69030 Oil and Gas Production (Combustion) 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.17040 Petroleum Refining (Combustion) 0.00 2.42 0.00 2.42050 Manufacturing and Industrial 0.12 1.61 0.37 1.04 0.49 2.65052 Food and Agricultural Processing 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.09 0.01 0.19060 Service and Commercial 0.55 0.89 0.20 0.23 0.74 1.11099 Other (Fuel Combustion) 0.20 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.33110 Sewage Treatment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00120 Landfills 0.14 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.20

130 Incinerators 0.08 0.11 0.08 0.11199 Other (Waste Disposal) 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14210 Laundering 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00220 Degreasing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00230 Coatings and Related Process Solvents 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06240 Printing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00250 Sealants & Adhesives 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00299 Other (Cleaning and Surface Coatings) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00310 Oil and Gas Production 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03320 Petroleum Refining 4.50 0.79 4.50 0.79330 Petroleum Marketing 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05399 Other (Petroleum Production and Marketing) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00410 Chemical 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50420 Food and Agriculture 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23430 Mineral Processes 0.01 2.72 0.00 1.35 0.01 4.07

440 Metal Processes 0 05 1 32 0 00 0 00 0 05 1 32

Point Area Total Stationary

MSC SumName

440 Metal Processes 0.05 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.32450 Wood and Paper 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.03 0.00 1.11460 Glass and Related Products 0.26 0.27 0.26 0.27470 Electronics 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00499 Other (Industrial Processes) 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.18

NOX/SOX Reclaim 12.03 12.03

Total Emissions (T/D) 18 14 1 4 0 18.8 17.6

Annual Average inventory.

Rounds off may introduce slight discrepancies in totals.

G:\AIR-3\Permit Programs\NSR Info\District NSR Rulemaking\By Districts\South Coast\Rule 1315\TSD support Docs
#### Gloria Villa DE CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-72350

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2017 *

Filed July 19, 2017

Thomas A. Láppin, Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Thomas A. Lappin, San Diego, CA, for Petitioner

Surell Brady, Esquire, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: CÁNBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable' for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gloria Villa de Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate removal proceedings, denying her application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and ordering her removed. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review dé novo the denial of a motion to terminate and claims of constitutional violations. *Martinez-Medina v. Holder,*673 F.3d 1029, 1033 (9th Cir. 2011). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err or violate due process in denying Villa de Carrillo’s motion to terminate removal| proceedings or in sustaining the removability charges, because *Samayoa-Martinez v. Holder*forecloses her contention that her statements to immigration officials at the border were unconstitutionally obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(e). 558 F.3d 897, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2009); *see Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d *5281241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien must show error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Villa de Carrillo’s CAT claim, because Villa de Carrillo failed to establish it is more likely than not she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. *See Silaya*at 1073; *Zheng v. Holder,*644 F.3d 829, 836-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (claims of possible torture were speculative).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust
Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2006-WFHE3

Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest
Distributions to Certificateholders for 2006

Class      Interest            Principal            Realized           Ending
          Distribution            Paid               Losses            Balance

A1        5,297,586.32       39,104,007.13           0.00       603,808,992.87
A2        2,436,919.92                0.00           0.00       289,039,000.00
A3        1,605,014.69                0.00           0.00       188,628,000.00
A4        1,334,073.81                0.00           0.00       154,248,000.00
CE        7,497,565.36            1,587.16           0.00        28,474,159.82
M1          546,664.58                0.00           0.00        62,643,000.00
M10         247,400.47                0.00           0.00        20,338,000.00
M11         197,915.51                0.00           0.00        16,270,000.00
M2          647,204.20                0.00           0.00        74,032,000.00
M3          257,408.98                0.00           0.00        29,288,000.00
M4          244,830.59                0.00           0.00        27,661,000.00
M5          224,401.96                0.00           0.00        25,220,000.00
M6          175,247.72                0.00           0.00        19,525,000.00
M7          162,649.20                0.00           0.00        17,085,000.00
M8          151,969.32                0.00           0.00        15,458,000.00
M9          182,741.41                0.00           0.00        16,271,000.00
P           247,221.12                0.00           0.00               100.00
R                 0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00
RX                0.00                0.00           0.00                 0.00
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,257
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 558,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,023
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   558,923
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (44,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (44,415)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (44,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (44,415)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.002)



</TABLE>
#### Noel RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ISAAC, Counselor at Corcoran State Prison-SHU, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-15705

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 25, 2017

*468Noel Rodriguez, Pro Se

Neah Huynh, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Misha Igra, Esquire, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Noel Rodriguez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). *Watison v. Carter,*668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Rodriguez’s action because Rodriguez failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant caused the alleged constitutional deprivation. *See Farmer v. Brennan,*511 U.S. 825, 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (to violate the Eighth Amendment, a prison official must know of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate safety); *Harper v. City of Los Angeles,*533 F.3d 1010, 1026 (9th Cir. 2008) (in a § 1983 action, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant’s conduct caused the claimed injury by establishing both causation-in-fact and proximate causation).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 14, 2011 

jam 

Order 

 

September 14, 2011 

143720 (51) 

GORDON SCOTT DITTMER, 

 Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 143720 

 COA: 298997 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CT of CLAIMS: 09-000126 MP 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

DIRECTOR, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY WARDEN, ST. LOUIS 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY DEPUTY 

WARDEN and ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL 

FACILITY CORRECTIONS OFFICER, 

 Respondents-Appellees. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, appellant shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $9.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If appellant timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to appellant’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$366.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) appellant shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to appellant 

and return appellant’s pleadings with this order. 
2
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-225-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements foraircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might bethe only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory C. Talbott, the Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company), in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the Report), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o (d)) and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                               
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|February 20, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Gregory C. Talbott                                                                        
|Dated             |  |  |  | Gregory C. Talbott                                                                            
|                  |  |  |  | Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BRIGHTCUBE, INC. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Brightcube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: March 31, 2010





/s/Michael Manion





Michael Manion


Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Michael Manion





Michael Manion


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of RFG Acquisition II Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard F. Beston, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard F. Beston, Jr.Richard F. Beston, Jr.Principal Executive OfficerMarch 22, 2011
#### Atlanta Gas-Light Company *v.*Farrell *et al.*

No. 13191.

June 11, 1940.

*Alston, Foster, Moise & Sibley*and *Henry J. Miller,*for plaintiff in error.

*McElreath, Scott, Duckworth & DuVall,*contra.

Bell, Justice.

The Court of Appeals correctly held that the appliance in question became a part of the realty upon its installation as an adjunct of the furnace, and that as against the owner or a purchaser of the realty the tenant had no authority to contract with a conditional vendor for the removal of such appliance upon failure to pay the purchase money. *Farrell*v. *Atlanta Gas-Light Co.,*61 *Ga. App.*18 (5 S. E. 2d, 607). The decision of the Court of Appeals appears to be correct as applied to the facts shown, and to afford no cause of complaint to the petitioner in certiorari. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2016

t0414

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2016

146819

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146819

COA: 314080

Wayne CC: 94-002089-FC

CORTEZ ROLAND DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, in conformity with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the 

United States, we REVERSE the January 16, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals, we 

VACATE the defendant’s sentence for first-degree murder, and we REMAND this case 

to the Wayne Circuit Court for resentencing on that conviction pursuant to MCL 769.25 

and MCL 769.25a. See Montgomery v Louisiana, 577 US ___; 136 S Ct 718; 193 L Ed 

2d 599 (2016), and Miller v Alabama, 567 US ___; 132 S Ct 2455; 183 L Ed 2d 407 

(2012). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of drugstore.com, inc. (the Company)
for the period ending December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Potter, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert P. PotterRobert P. PotterVice President and Chief Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to drugstore.com, inc. and will be retained by drugstore.com, inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 13, 2009