### 46865 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules

requirements of 40 CFR part 75. The testing and evaluation of the inlet
monitors and the calculations of relative accuracy for lb/hr of NO X , SO 2 and heat input shall be performed each time the 40 CFR part 75 CEMS undergo relative accuracy testing.

(ii) Compliance determinations for

NO X
. (A) [Reserved] (B) Coronado Generating Station. Compliance with the NO X emission limits for Coronado Unit 1 and Coronado Unit 2 in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of
this section shall be determined on a rolling 30 boiler-operating-day basis. The 30-boiler-operating-day rolling NO X emission rate for each unit shall be
calculated in accordance with the following procedure: Step one, sum the total pounds of NO X emitted from the unit during the current boiler operating day and the previous twenty-nine (29) boiler operating days; Step two, sum the total heat input to the unit in MMBtu during the current boiler operating day and the previous twenty-nine (29) boiler operating days; Step three, divide the total number of pounds of NO X emitted from that unit during the thirty (30) boiler operating days by the total heat input to the unit during the thirty (30)boiler operating days. A new 30-boileroperating-day rolling average NO X emission rate shall be calculated for each new boiler operating day. Each 30- boiler-operating-day average NO X emission rate shall include all emissions that occur during all periods within any boiler operating day, including emissions from startup, shutdown, and
malfunction.

(C) If a valid NO X pounds per hour or heat input is not available for any hour for a unit, that heat input and NO X pounds per hour shall not be used in the calculation of the 30-day rolling

average.

(iii) Compliance determinations for

SO 2 . (A) The 30-day rolling average SO 2 emission rate for each coal-fired unit
shall be calculated in accordance with the following procedure: Step one, sum the total pounds of SO 2 emitted from the unit during the current boiler-operating day and the previous twenty-nine (29) boiler-operating days; step two, sum the total heat input to the unit in MMBtu during the current boiler-operating day and the previous twenty-nine (29) boiler-operating day; and step three, divide the total number of pounds of

SO 2 emitted during the thirty (30) boiler-operating days by the total heatinput during the thirty (30) boileroperating days. A new 30-day rolling average SO 2 emission rate shall be calculated for each new boiler-operating day. Each 30-day rolling average SO 2 emission rate shall include all emissions and all heat input that occur during all periods within any boiler-operating day, including emissions from startup, shutdown, and malfunction.

(B) [Reserved] (C) If a valid SO 2 pounds per hour at the outlet of the FGD system or heat input is not available for any hour for a unit, that heat input and SO 2 pounds per hour shall not be used in the calculation of the 30-day rolling

average.

(D) If both a valid inlet and outlet SO 2 lb/MMBtu and an outlet value of lb/hr
of SO 2 are not available for any hour,
that hour shall not be included in the efficiency calculation.

* * * * *

(10) Equipment operations. (i) [Reserved] (ii) Coronado Generating Station. At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator of Coronado Generating Station Unit 1 and Unit 2 shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate
each unit in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. The owner or operator shall continuously operate pollution control equipment at all times the unit it serves is in operation, and operate pollution control equipment in a manner consistent with technological limitations, manufacturer’s specifications, and good engineering and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of whether acceptable operating and maintenance procedures are being used will be based on information available to the Regional Administrator which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of operating and maintenance procedures, and inspection of each unit.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2016–16959 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0221; FRL–9948–88– Region 8]** 

**Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions to**  **Permits, Rules and Approval Orders;**
**Utah**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule. **SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Utah on February 10, 2012 and August 29, 2014. These submittals request SIP revisions to remove changes to the major source baseline date that were disapproved by the EPA on July 15,
2011. The submittals also address the EPA’s February 6, 2014 disapproval of several permit rules related to the public availability of good engineering practice stack height demonstrations in the public comment process for an approval order, and the process for making
emission reductions enforceable in an approval order. The EPA is taking this
action in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

**DATES :**  Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– OAR–2016–0221, at http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov

. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission ( i.e. , on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jody Ostendorf, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–7814, ostendorf.jody@epa.gov.

Incorporation by Reference

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the Utah rules


### 46866 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 138 / Tuesday, July 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules

1 Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal areas consist of national parks exceeding 6000 acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks exceeding 5000 acres, and all international parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977 (42 U.S.C. 7472(a)).

2 On August 22, 2012, EPA approved New Hampshire’s Regional Haze SIP submittal addressing the requirements of the first implementation period for regional haze. See 77 FR

50602. described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the **FOR FURTHER**

**INFORMATION CONTACT** section of this preamble for more information).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register , the EPA is approving the State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the agency views this as a
noncontroversial SIP revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final
rule.

If the EPA receives no adverse comments, the EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the EPA
will withdraw the direct final rule and
it will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule.

The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further information, please see the **ADDRESSES** section of this notice.

Please note that if the EPA receives
adverse comment on a distinct provision of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. See the information provided in the Direct Final action of
the same title which is located in the Rules and Regulations Section of this Federal Register

.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: June 22, 2016.
Shaun L. McGrath, Regional Administrator, Region 8.

[FR Doc. 2016–16960 Filed 7–18–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R01–OAR–2014–0909; FRL–9949–15– Region 1]** 

**Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Regional Haze 5-Year Report** 

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule. **SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of New Hampshire on December 16, 2014. New Hampshire’s SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA’s rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established for regional
haze and a determination of the adequacy of the State’s existing Regional Haze SIP. In addition, the December 16,
2014 submittal includes a revised regulation that reduces the total suspended particulate (TSP) emissionlimit for the State’s sole TangentialFiring, Dry-Bottom Boiler.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA–

R01–OAR–2014–0909 at http:// www.regulations.gov, or via email to arnold.anne@epa.gov . For comments submitted at Regulations.gov , follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov . For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission ( i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ‘‘For
Further Information Contact’’ section. For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Anne McWilliams, Air Quality Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square—Suite 100, (Mail Code OEP05–02), Boston, MA 02109— 3912, telephone number (617) 918– 1697, fax number (617) 918–0697, email mcwilliams.anne@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean

EPA.

Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this preamble.

I. Background II. Requirements for Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report SIPs and Adequacy

Determinations III. EPA’s Evaluation of New Hampshire’s SIP

Revision A. Regional Haze Progress Report B. Determination of Adequacy of Existing

Regional Haze Plan
C. Revised Env–A 2302.02 Emission

Standards Applicable to TangentialFiring, Dry-Bottom Boilers IV. Proposed Action V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

States are required to submit a progress report in the form of a SIP revision every five years that evaluates progress towards the RPGs for each mandatory Class I Federal area 1 (Class I area) within the state and in each Class I area outside the state which may be affected by emissions from within the

state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g). In addition, the provisions under 40 CFR 51.308(h) require states to submit, at the same time as the 40 CFR 51.308(g) progress report, a determination of the adequacy of the state’s existing Regional Haze SIP. The first progress report SIP is due five years after submittal of the initial Regional Haze SIP. On January 29, 2010, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) submitted the State’s first Regional Haze
SIP in accordance with 40 CFR 51.308. 2

On December 16, 2014, NH DES
submitted a revision to the New Hampshire SIP detailing the progress made in the first planning period toward implementation of the Long Term Strategy (LTS) outlined in the 2010 Regional Haze SIP submittal, the visibility improvement measured at the State’s Class I areas, and a determination of the adequacy of the State’s existing Regional Haze SIP. EPA is proposing to approve New Hampshire’s December 16, 2014 SIP
revision on the basis that it satisfies the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(g) and (h).