### DATE: September 29 , 2011

SUBJECT: Section 112(d)(6) Technology Review for Wool Fiberglass NESHAP EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 06

- 118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4

- 10 RTI Project No. 0210426.004.010

FROM: Cindy Hancy Dave Reeves

TO: Susan Fairchild , EPA /OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of a review on developments in practices, processes, and control technologies that apply to wool fiberglass production , and specifically to sources subject to the national emission s tandards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for Wool Fiberglass Production (40 CFR 63, subpart NNN )

. This analysis is part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ( EPA’s ) review efforts in accordance with section 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act (C AA)

. Section I of this memorandum provides background information on the requirements of section 112(d)(6) of the CAA , the wool fiberglass source category, and the requirements of the Wool Fiberglass NESHAP

. Section II discusses the review of information on developments in practices, processes, and control technologies that have occurred since the original development of this NESHAP

.

I. Background/Purpose

A. Requirements of Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA

Section 112 of the CAA require s EPA to establish technology

- based standards for source s of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) . These technology

- based standards are often referred to as maximum achievable control technology, or MACT, standards. Section 112 also contains provisions requiring EPA to revisit t hese standards. Specifically, paragraph 112(d)(6) section states:

(6) REVIEW AND REVISION.

– The Administrator shall review, and revise as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies), emission standards promulgated under this section no less often than every 8 years.

For the purpose of this technology review , a “development” was considered to be any of the following :

• A dd

- on control technology or other equipment that was not identified and considered du ring the development of the NESHAP;

### 2

• I mprovements in add

- on control technology or other equipment that w ere not identified and considered during NESHAP development that could result in significan t additional HAP emissions reductions;

• W ork practice or opera tional procedure that was not identified and considered during NESHAP development ; and

• P rocess change or pollution prevention alternative that could be broadly applied that was not identified and considered during the development of the NESHAP.

B. Descri ption of Source Category and NESHAP Requirement s 1



### Wool fiberglass manufacturing is the high

- temperature conversion of various raw materials into a homogeneous melt, followed by the fabrication of this melt into glass fibers. Wool fiberglass production can be segmented into 3 phases: raw materials handling, glass melting, and wool glass fiber forming and finishing. The primary component of glass fiber is sand, but it also includes varying quantities of feldspar, sodium sulfate, anhydrous borax, boric acid, and many other materials. In the glass melting furnace, the raw materials are heated to a high temperature and are transformed through a sequence of chemical reactions to molten glass. Although there are many furnace designs, furnaces are generally large, shallow, and well

- insulated vessels that are heated from above. In operation, raw materials are introduced continuously on top of a bed of molten glass, where they slowly mix and dissolve. Mixing is effected by natural convection, gases rising from chemic al reactions, and, in some operations, by air or oxygen injection into the bottom of the bed. Oxygen is also used as a fuel and replaces air at some furnaces.

Glass melting furnaces vary in fuel source and method of heat application into 4 types: recupera tive, regenerative, unit, and electric melter. The recuperative, regenerative, and unit melter furnaces can be fueled by either gas or oil and may supplement those fuels with oxygen

. Recuperative furnaces use a steel heat exchanger, recovering heat from th e exhaust gases by exchange with the combustion air. Regenerative furnaces use a lattice of brickwork to recover waste heat from exhaust gases. Electric furnaces melt glass by passing an electric current through the melt. Electric furnaces are either hot

- t op or cold

- top. The former use gas for auxiliary heating and the latter use only the electric current

. Unit melters are used only for the "indirect" marble melting process

. Wool fiberglass is generally produced for insulation and is formed in to mats that are cut into batts, however, some facilities produce loose wool and other specialty products. During the formation of fibers into a wool fiberglass mat (th e process known as "forming" in the industry), glass fibers are made from molten glass and if the pr oduct is “bonded”, a chemical binder is simultaneously sprayed on the fibers as they are created. Historically, t he binder wa s a thermosetting resin that hol ds the glass fibers together. Although the binder composition varies with pro duct type, typically t he binder consists of a solution of phenol

- formaldehyde resin, water, ur ea, lignin, silane, and ammonia, however new many facilities have begun to use phenol

formaldehyde free resins , many of which do not require heat to cure them in a thermosetting proces s

. Two methods of creating fibers are used by the industry. In the rotary s pin process, centri fugal force causes molten glass to flow through small holes in the wall of a rapidly rotating cylinder t o create fibers that are broken into s trands in an air st ream. In the flame attenuation process, molten glass flows by gravity from a furnace through numerous small orifices to create

### 3

threads that are then attenuated (stretched to the point of breaking) by high velocity, hot air, and/or a flame. After the glass fibers are created (by either process) and sprayed with the binder solution (if bonded) , they are collected by gravity on a conv eyor belt in the form of a mat. If a thermoset bonded product is being produced, t he conveyor carries the newly formed wool fibe rglass through a large oven to cure the thermosetting binder and then through a cooling section where ambient air is drawn down through the mat. The wool fiberglass is then cooled before trimming. This curing process is not performe d if the product is not bonded or if the resin is not one requiring the thermosetting process . A summary of emission units regulated under the proposed Subpart NN for wool fiberglass facilities is included in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of Wool Fiberglass Production Emission Unit s

Emission Unit Description HAP Emitted Furnace F urnace where raw material is melted. COS, metals , HF, HCl RS Lines RS lines that produce bonded building insulation products (includes forming, curing, and collection processes). F ormaldehyde, methanol , and phenol (bonded products only) FA Lines FA lines that produce bonded pipe insulation and heavy density products (includes forming, curing, and collection processes).

The current Wool Fiberglass NESHAP was promulgated on June 1 4 , 1999 and applies to new and existing glass melting furnaces, each new and existing FA manufacturing line producing a bonded pipe product or a bonded heavy density product, and each new and existing RS manufacturing line producing a bonded wool fiberglass building insulation p roduct. The wool fiberglass production source category currently consists of 29 facili ties in the US; combined, these facilities operate approximately 80 furnaces and over 100 process lines.

II. Practices, Processes, and Control Technologies for Wool Fib erglass Production

A. Control Technologies Considered for NESHAP

For the purpose of this exercise, a “development” was considered to be:

• Any add

- on control technology or other equipment (e.g., floating roofs for storage tanks) that was not identified an d considered during MACT development,

• Any improvements in add

- on control technology or other equipment (that was identified and considered during MACT development) that could result in significant additional emission reduction,

• Any work practice or operati onal procedure that was not identified and considered during MACT development, and

• Any process change or pollution prevention alternative that could be broadly applied that was not identified and considered during MACT development.

### 4

Table 2 summarizes the practices, processes, and control technologies considered during the development of the MACT standard. This is followed by descriptions of the searches for developments since that time. The specific information sources that were consulted in this effort in cluded EPA regulatory efforts conducted subsequent to these rulemakings ( S ection II.B ), direct correspondence with the industry ( S ection II.C), and EPA’s RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse ( S ection II. D).

Table 2 . Summary of Practices, Processes, and Control T echnologies Identified and Considered During Wool Fiberglass Production MACT Development 2



### Emission Source Practices, Processes, and Control Technologies Furnaces Fabric filter , ESP , batch wetting Bonded Manufacturing lines ( RS/FA ) Wet ESP, scrubber, for ming air recirculation , mist eliminator, water over spray , HVAF, i ncineration, special binder formulations

B. Technology Developments Since Promulgation of NESHAP

Since the NESHAP was promulgated in 199 9 , several developments were identified. Although the methods for controlling emissions from furnaces are the same as in 1999, improvements in those technologies have developed. In addition, some curing operations are no longer needed due to the development of new binders that have replaced the phenol

- f ormaldehyde binder (which required thermosetting) with a non

- HAP binder that may or may not require thermosetting.

Additionally, new equipment known as ‘high chrome refractory’ is in place in some wool fiberglass furnaces to extend the furnace life. Th e refractory materials are bricks, blocks, shapes, and cementitious materials from which furnaces are constructed. At least two refractory manufacturers have developed a new product line of refractories that are made from over 90% chromium compounds.

C

. C orrespondence with I ndustry

In an attempt to identify new emission control technologies in use, a voluntary information request was sent to all 29 wool fiberglass facilities. To identify new technologies , facilities were asked to identify any controls that did not fall under the following categories: electrostatic precipitator ( ESP ), s crubber, mechanical collector, fabric filter, thermal incinerator, high velocity air filter (HVAF) , mist eliminator, or ventilation system. Facilities did not list any co ntrol devices that have not already been identified. At least one wool fiberglass facility was identified to have a scrubber and dry ESP combination for controls on a furnace. Further research shows that a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) scrubber could be used on furnaces to reduce HF and HCl emissions and selectively reduce c hromium compounds emissions

. Industry was also contacted to discuss chromium emissions from the wool fiberglass source category. Industry was not aware of any one reason that explains why cer tain furnaces emit high

### 5

levels of chromium but believe that it is associated with developments in the construction of o xy

fuel and specialty furnaces.

D

. Search for Other Applicable Technology Developments

In addition to the information discussed above , searches of the RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse an d the Internet w ere conducted to identify other technologies or developments that could be applied to wool fiberglass production

. The results of these searches are described in the following paragraphs.

RA CT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse 3



### Under EPA ’ s New Source Review (NSR) program, if a company is planning to build a new plant or modify an existing plant such that air pollution emissions will increase by a large amount, the company must obtain an NSR permit. T he NSR permit is a construction permit which requires the company to minimize air pollution emissions by changing the process to prevent air pollution and/or installing air pollution control equipment.

The terms “ RACT, ” “ BACT, ” and “ LAER ” are acronyms fo r different program requirements under the NSR program. RACT, or Reasonably Available Control Technology, is required on sources in areas that are not meeting national ambient air quality standards (i.e., non

- attainment areas). BACT, or Best Available Co ntrol Technology, is required on major new or modified sources in attainment areas. LAER, or Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, is required on major new or modified sources in non

- attainment areas.

BACT and LAER (and sometimes RACT) are determined on a ca se

- by

- case basis, usually by State or local permitting agencies. EPA established the RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse, or RBLC, to provide a central database of air pollution technology information (including past BACT and LAER decisions contained in NSR perm its) to promote the sharing of information among permitting agencies and to aid in future case

- by

- case determinations. However, data in the RBLC are not limited to sources subject to RACT, BACT, and LAER requirements. Noteworthy prevention and control tec hnology decisions and information are included even if they are not related to past R ACT, BACT or LAER decisions.

The RBLC contains over 5,000 air pollution control permit determinations that can help identify appropriate technologies to mitigate most air pollutant emission streams. It was designed to help permit applicants and reviewers make pollution prevention and control technology decisions for stationary air pollution sources, and includes data submitted by several U.S. territories and all 50 States on over 200 different air pollutants and 1,000 industrial processes.

To identify technologies appropriate for wool fiberglass production , searches of the RBLC were made using the Process Type Codes : 99.0 33

– Wool Fiberglass

. All records from 199 9 to 201 1 were searched. In all cases, the control devices and methods identified through the RBLC search

### 6

d o not represent new technologies for controlling HAP emissions

. Attachment 1 show s the results of the RBLC search for wool fiberglass

. 1



### Internet Search

A general search of the Internet was conducted for information on control technologies for wool fiberglass furnaces , RS and FA manufacturing lines . The i nternet search did not identif y any new practices, processes, or technologies that have not already bee n considered in this review.

III. Technology Review Findings

After reviewing emissions data provided by facilities , it was ev ident that PM emissions from wool fiberglass furnaces were for the most part, significantly lower than the current MACT li mit , wi th the lowest emission rate provided being three orders of magnitude lower than the current limit. Since the promulgation of the Wool Fiberglass NESHAP , PM emissions have been reduced significantly which is likely due to increases in PM control efficiency

. In order to reflect the current PM emission rates obtained by facilities, EPA is proposing to revise the existing PM limit from 0.5 to 0.014 lb PM/ton for existing sources and 0.0018 lb PM/ton for new sources. Th ese emissions limit s w ere calculated using the same methodology as that used for HF and HCl in the Technical Approach for Wool Fiberglass MACT Floor Calculations

. New developments in furnace construction materials (i.e., refractory bricks) have resulted in significantly higher chrome and hexe valen t chromium emissions at certain facilities. One facility was found to emit more than 800 lbs of chromium compounds per year.

Because of the following factors, we believe a strong economic incentive exists for wool fiberglass companies to rebuild furnaces using this new product:

• glass furnaces must be rebuilt every 7

- 10 years;

• most of the cost of furnace construction (or reconstruction) is incurred in the labor cost;

• the cost to rebuild a glass furnace is between $10

- 12 million;

• the cost of high chrome re fractories is about 15% greater than conventional refractories; and

• the furnace life is almost doubled if constructed from high chrome refractories.

However, we found from the emissions testing and our conversations with the highest chromium emitting s ource that the use of high chrome refractories result in high levels of hexavalent chromium emissions.

In order to control chromium emissions, EPA is proposing a new emissions limit of 6.0E

- 5 lb chromium/ton for both new and existing sources. This chromi um limit is based on chromium emissions data provided by wool fiberglass facilities and reflects a level achievable by most furnaces that are not considered high emitters.

1 The following controls for no n

- HAP pollutants were found: Low NOx Burners, good combustion practices limitations in sodium nitrate added to mixed glass, quench towers with caustic injection for SO2 control,

### 7

IV

. References

1

. Emission Factor Documentation For AP

- 42 Section11.1 3 Glass F iber Manufacturing. http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch11/final/c11s13.pdf

2. Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing. Background Information for Proposed Standards. December 1983 htt p://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe?Client=EPA&Index=1981+Thru+1985&Docs=&Query =%28control%29+OR+FNAME%3D%22000027SW.txt%22+AND+FNAME%3D%220000 27SW.txt%22&FuzzyDegree=0&ZyAction=ZyActionD&User=ANONYMOUS&Password= anonymous&SortMethod=h|&MaximumDocuments=10&Imag eQuality=r75g8%2Fr75g8%2 Fx150y150g16%2Fi425&Display=p|f&DefSeekPage=x&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMetho d=1&Toc=&TocEntry=&TocRestrict=n&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldD ay=&UseQField=&IntQFieldOp=1&ExtQFieldOp=1&XmlQuery=&SearchBack=ZyAction L&Back=ZyAction S&BackDesc=Results+page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=&SeekPage= &ZyActionID=&File=D%3A \ \ ZYFILES \ \ INDEX+DATA \ \ 81THRU85 \ \ TXT \ \ 00000000 \ \ 00 0027SW.txt&Doc=%3Cdocument+name%3D%22000027SW.txt%22+path%3D%22D%3A \ ZYFILES \ INDEX+DATA \ 81THRU85 \ TXT \ 00000000 \ %22+index%3D%22198 1+Thru+19 85%22%2F%3E&QueryTerms=450382022A+wool+fiberglass+preamble+EPA

3

. Technology Transfer Network, Clean Air Technology Center

- RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse. http://cfpub.epa.gov/rblc/index.cfm?action=Reports.ReportComprehensive Report&ReportFormat= pdf&CFID=37103671&CFTOKEN=78160853&jsessionid=cc30594 937a01e31703d13f4615b7942343e

4. Meeting Notes. Conversation between Carlos Davis, Certainteed, Kansas City, KS and Susan Fairchild, Environmental Scientist, US Environmental Protection Agency. April 1 4, 2011.

5. Meeting and Site Visit Notes. Conversation between Carlos Davis, Certainteed, Kansas City, KS and Hugh McCullough, Environmental Scientist, Region 7, US Environmental Protection Agency. Various dates, 2011.

### Attachment 1

## COMPREHENSIVE REPORT Report Date:08/15/2011 

## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## CA-1141 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 03/13/2008 Corporate/Company Name: KNAUF INSULATION GMBH Permit Number: SAC 03-01 Facility Name: KNAUF INSULATION GMBH Permit Date: 05/11/2006 (actual) Facility Contact: MR. STEPHEN R. ALDRIDGE 8664452363 STEVE.ALDRIDGE@KNAUFUSA.COM FRS Number: 110015679041

Facility Description: WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING FACILITY SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: C: Modify process at existing facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 9 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: SHASTA COUNTY Facility State: CA Facility ZIP Code: 96019 Permit Issued By: EPA REGION IX (Agency Name) MR. GERARDO RIOS(Agency Contact) (415)972-3974 rios.gerardo@epa.gov Other Agency Contact Info: SHAHEERAH KELLY AIR DIVISION (AIR-3) EPA REGION 9 SAN FRANCISCO, CA PHONE: (415) 947-4156 EMAIL: KELLY.SHAHEERAH@EPA.GOV Permit Notes: PSD PERMIT WAS INITIALLY ISSUED ON MARCH 14, 2000.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: ELECTRIC GLASS MELTING FURNACE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: ELECTRIC Throughput: 225.00 T/D

Process Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/T 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 0.6700 LB/H 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) USE OF 2 BAGHOUSE DUST COLLECTORS AND AN ELECTRIC GLASS MELTING FURNACE. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 2.9 TONS PER YEAR, BASED ON A 12-MONTH ROLLING SUM



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING LINE

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 225.00 T/D

Process Notes: THE MANUFACTURING LINE CONSISTS OF FORMING, CURING AND COOLING SECTIONS WHICH VENT TO A COMMON STACK.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.7600 LB/T 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 16.5000 LB/H 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (P) LOW NOX BURNERS AND COMBUSTION CONTROL

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: USE OF LOW NOX BURNERS FOR NOX CONTROL AND A THERMAL OXIDIZER FOR VOC CONTROL REQUIRED AT CURING SECTION. USE OF COMBUSTION CONTROLS WHICH MINIMIZE PEAK FLAME TEMPERATURES IN THE FIBER FORMING PROCESS FOR NOX CONTROL REQUIRED AT FORMING SECTION.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.0300 LB/T 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: 28.4000 LB/H 3-HOUR ROLLING AVERAGE Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) (1) VENTURI SCRUBBERS & WESP AT FORMING SECTION; (2) THERMAL OXIDIZER AT CURING SECTION; AND (3) VENTURI SCRUBBER AT COOLING SECTION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THERMAL OXIDIZER AT CURING SECTION MINIMIZES VOC AND SOME PARTICULATES.



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## GA-0125 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 12/23/2005 Corporate/Company Name: OWENS CORNING Permit Number: 3296081-0063-P-01-0

Facility Name: OWENS CORNING CORDELE Permit Date: 10/31/2005 (actual) Facility Contact: MICHAEL PETTIS 7409753428 MIKE.PETTIS@OWENSCORNING.COM FRS Number: 110023160407 Facility Description: WOOL FIBERGLASS INSULATION MANUFACTURING CAPABLE OF MAKING BOTH BONDED AND NONBONDED LIGHT DENSITY INSULATION PRODUCTS SIC Code: 3296Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327993

Permit URL: EPA Region: 4 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: CRISP Facility State: GA Facility ZIP Code: 31015 Permit Issued By: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (Agency Name) MR. JOHN YNTEMA(Agency Contact) (404)363-7117 john_yntema@dnr.state.ga.us Other Agency Contact Info: BRIAN MASSENGALE 404 363-7112 Permit Notes: THIS BACT DETERMINATION IS SPECIFIC TO A WOOL FIBERGLASS PLANT MANUFACTURING FDM 4.2 AND CANNOR BE GENERALIZED IN THE FIBERGLASS INSULATION MANUFACTING INDUSTRY.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BONDED FORMING AND CURING SECTION (CG104-105) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput:

Process Notes: BONDED FORMING AND CURING SECTION (CG104-105) BACT LIMITS ARE SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.23 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.0000 LB/TGP PER TON GLASS PULLED (TGP) Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , NSPS , SIP Control Method: (A) THERMAL OXIDIZER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM4.2 FIBERGLASS

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) GOOD COMBUSTION CONTROL PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.0000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) GOOD COMBUSTION CONTROL PRACTICES Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM4.2

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8400 LB/TGP TOTAL PM Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 7.8000 LB/TGP PER TON GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (A) INHERENT PROCESS EQUIPMENT, LOW PRESSURE DROP SCRUBBERS AND CYCLONE SEPERATOR Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM4.2



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BONDED LINE COOLING SECTION CG106 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: BACT LIMITS LISTED ARE SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9500 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.9500 LB/TGP PER TON GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (A) LOW PRESSURE DROP SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000Compliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS MELT FURNACE CG101 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: NATURAL GAS BACKUP

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 13.5000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: NCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) LIMITED BASED ON AMOUNT OF SODIUM NITRATE ADDED TO MIXED GLASS BATCH Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5800 LB/TGP TOTAL PM Emission Limit 2: 0.5000 LB/TGP FILTERABLE PM Standard Emission: 0.5800 LB/TGP PER TON GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Y Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) BATCH WETTING SYSTEM Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Compliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: ROTARY SPIN FIBERGLASS LINE CG2 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 2.4000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , OPERATING PERMIT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8000 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.3700 LB/TGP Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Compliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.0000 LB/TGP TOTAL PM Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 4.0000 LB/TGP PER TON GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) LOW PRESSURE DROP SCRUBBER AND CYCLONE SEPERATOR Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SPECIFIC TO FDM 4.2 FIBERGLASS INSULATION



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MATERIAL HANDLING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 GR/DSCF Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: NCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## OH-0301 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 08/24/2006 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL Permit Number: 03-16294

Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL, PLANT 8 Permit Date: 06/02/2005 (actual) Facility Contact: G.R. BONIN FRS Number: 110006195777 Facility Description: FIBERGLASS PIPE INSULATION MFG. THIS PROJECT REPRESENTS A NET INCREASE OF 4.23 TONS/YEAR PM10 AND 13.23 TONS/YEAR VOC AND A NET DECREASE OF 5.62 TONS/YEAR OF CO, DUE TO A FIRE AN LOSS OF SIMILAR SOURCES IN 5/03. THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE FIBERGLASS FACILITY LOST TO FIRE AND THEY HAVE NETTED OUT OF PSD. SIC Code: 3296

Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: DEFIANCE Facility State: OH Facility ZIP Code: 43512 Permit Issued By: OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Agency Name) MS. CHERYL SUTTMAN(Agency Contact) (614)644-3617 CHERYL.SUTTMAN@EPA.STATE.OH.US Permit Notes: THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE FIBERGLASS FACILITY LOST TO FIRE AND THEY HAVE NETTED OUT OF PSD. THE FACILITY WIDE POLLUTANTS REPRESENTS THE TOTAL OF THE NEW PERMIT AND UNITS IN THIS RBLC ENTRY.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS ELECTRIC GLASS MELTER (3)PROCESS

NAME: ELECTRIC GLASS MELTER (3)

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: ELECTRIC Throughput: 1357.00 lb/h

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB MOLTEN GLASS/H. RATE OF 1357 LB/H IS FOR EACH MELTER INDIVIDUALLY, AVERAGE PRODUCTION IS 970

LB/H. MAXIMUM OF 5309 TONS OF MOLTEN GLASS PER YEAR FOR EACH MELTER, OR 15,927 TONS OF GLASS PER YEAR FROM ALL 3.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3400 LB/H FOR EACH MELTER Emission Limit 2: 4.4700 T/YR FROM ALL 3 MELTERS TOGETHER Standard Emission: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR BAG LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM WITH COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE MONITORING

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8900 LB/H FOR EACH MELTER Emission Limit 2: 11.7000 T/YR FROM ALL 3 MELTERS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE-SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.000659 LB CO/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/H FOR EACH MELTER Emission Limit 2: 5.9100 T/YR FROM ALL 3 MELTERS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.000334 LB SO2/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY AT STACK AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY AT STACK AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE NOTE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO NOX LIMITS IN PERMIT FOR GLASS MELTERS. EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.000018 LB NOX/LB GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING AND COLLECTION (7)

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: ELECTRIC Throughput: 990.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS MAT/H. RATE OF 460 TO 990 LB GLASS/H IS FOR EACH FORMING UNIT INDIVIDUALLY. MAXIMUM OF

2015, 2891, AND 4336 TONS OF FIBER GLASS MAT PER YEAR FOR EACH MELTER. THREE SIZES OF FORMING UNITS: 4 AT 460 LB/H, 2 AT 660 LB/HR AND 1 AT 990 LB/H

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrocarbons, Total

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Organic Compounds (all) , Organic Non-HAP Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8700 LB/H INDIVIDUAL WORST CASE OF 7 FORMING UNITS Emission Limit 2: 33.7100 T/YR FROM ALL 7 FORMING UNITS TOGETHEREmission Limit 2: 33.7100 T/YR FROM ALL 7 FORMING UNITS TOGETHER

Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE -SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: POLLUTANT REGULATED IS ORGANICS. ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR IS 0.002596 LB OC/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AT STACK AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AT STACK AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 20% OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, EXCEPT MAY EXCEED 20% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FOR NOT MORE THAN 6 CONSECUTIVE MINUTES IN ANY 60 MINUTES, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 60% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE AT ANY TIME.

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.8000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 6.8000 LB/T GLASS PULLEDDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO NOX LIMITS IN PERMIT FOR FORMING UNITS. EMISSION FACTOR OF 43.33333 LB NOX/MMCF FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.0500 LB/H INDIVIDUAL WORST CASE OF 7 FORMING UNITS Emission Limit 2: 108.9200 T/YR ALL 7 FORMING UNITS COMBINED Standard Emission: 16.8000 LB/T GLASS PULLED SEE NOTE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (A) WATER SPRAY SYSTEM

Est. % Efficiency: 20.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSION FACTOR OF LB PM10/T OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 2.0200 LB/H FOR EACH OF 7 FORMING UNITS Emission Limit 2: 61.9500 T/YR FROM ALL 7 FORMING UNITS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 1064.6212 LB CO/MMCF IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT PERMIT SHOWS SAME LIMIT FOR ALL UNITS OF DIFFERENT SIZE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2100 LB/H WORST INDIVIDUAL CASE OF 7 FORMING UNITS Emission Limit 2: 3.7000 T/YR FROM ALL 7 FORMING UNITS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR IS 0.000232 LB SO2/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATIONPollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR IS 0.000232 LB SO2/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: SEAR ROLL AND CURING OVEN (8)

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: ELECTRIC Throughput: 440.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB INSULATION/H. RATE OF 440 LB/H IS FOR EACH CURING OVEN INDIVIDUALLY, AVERAGE PRODUCTION IS

352 LB/H. MAXIMUM OF 1927 TONS OF FIBER GLASS INSULATION PER YEAR FOR EACH MELTER, OR 13,489 TONS OF GLASS INSULATION PER YEAR FROM ALL 7.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2500 LB/H WORST CASE OF 8 CURING OVENS Emission Limit 2: 23.1700 T/YR FROM ALL 8 SEAR ROLL/CURE OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: 2.7800 LB/T GLASS PULLED NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: EMISSION FACTOR OF 2.78 LB PM10/TB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 2.7900 LB/H INDIVIDUAL WORST CASE OF 8 CURING OVENSEmission Limit 2: 51.6000 T/YR FROM ALL 8 SEAR ROLL/CURE OVENS TOGETHER

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.0031 LB CO/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3000 LB/H WORST CASE OF 8 CURING OVENS Emission Limit 2: 5.4800 T/YR FROM ALL 8 SEAR ROLL/CURE OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVILABLE SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.000333 LB SO2/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.8000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 6.8000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.0900 LB/H INDIVIDUAL WORST CASE OF 8 CURING OVENS Emission Limit 2: 19.7700 T/YR ALL 8 SEAR ROLL/CURE OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR IS 0.001216 LB NOX/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrocarbons, Total

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Organic Compounds (all) , Organic Non-HAP Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.1400 LB/H WORST CASE OF 8 CURING OVENS Emission Limit 2: 20.5700 T/YR FROM ALL 8 SEAR ROLL/CURE OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: POLLUTANT REGULATED IS ORGANICS. ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.001267 LB OC/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 20% OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, EXCEPT MAY EXCEED 20% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FOR NOT MORE THAN 6 CONSECUTIVE MINUTES IN ANY 60 MINUTES, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 60% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE AT ANY TIME.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: PRODUCT FINISHING UNITS (8)

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 900.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB PIPE/H. 100 TO 900 POUNDS OF PIPE INSULATION PER HOUR, MOST AT 400 LB/H FINISHING PIPE

INSULATION

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5900 LB/H WORST CASE FOR 8 FINISHING UNITS Emission Limit 2: 9.7900 T/YR FROM ALL 8 FINISHING UNITS TOGETHER Standard Emission: 1.4000 LB/T GLASS PULLED NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) CYCLONE AND BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: LB PM10/T GLASS PULLED EMISSION FACTOR IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) CYCLONE AND BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GDC OVEN(2) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 400.00 LB/HThroughput: 400.00 LB/H

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3700 LB/H FROM EACH OF 2 OVENS Emission Limit 2: 3.2400 T/YR FROM BOTH GDC OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: 3.2000 LB/T GLASS PULLED NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: LB PM10/LB GLASS PULLED IS EMISSION FACTOR FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7900 LB/H FROM EACH OF 2 OVENS Emission Limit 2: 6.9200 T/YR FROM BOTH GDC OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.003513 LB CO/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/H FROM EACH OF 2 OVENS Emission Limit 2: 0.7800 FROM BOTH GDC OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.000391 LB SO2/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrocarbons, Total

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Organic Compounds (all) , Organic Non-HAP Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3600 LB/H FROM EACH OF 2 OVENS Emission Limit 2: 3.1600 T/YR FROM BOTH GDC OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: POLLITANT REGULATED IS ORGANICS. ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.001576 LB OC/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: UnspecifiedTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 20% OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, EXCEPT MAY EXCEED 20% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FOR NOT MORE THAN 6 CONSECUTIVE MINUTES IN ANY 60 MINUTES, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 60% AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE AT ANY TIME.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3100 LB/H FROM EACH OF 2 OVENS Emission Limit 2: 2.7200 T/YR FROM BOTH GDC OVENS TOGETHER Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE - SEE NOTES Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ADDITIONAL EMISSION FACTOR OF 0.001378 LB NOX/LB OF GLASS IS FROM THE APPLICATION AND IS NOT A LIMIT



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RAW MATERIAL RECEIVING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4070.00 lb/h

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1800 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 5.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 5.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## MI-0375 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 08/13/2007 Corporate/Company Name: GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS, INCORPORATED Permit Number: 282-02A Facility Name: GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS, INC. Permit Date: 06/08/2004 (actual) Facility Contact: GROVER THOMAS 5176299464 FRS Number: 110000409923 Facility Description: MANUFACTURER OF FIBERGLASS INSULATION SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: D: Both B (Add new process to existing facility) &C (Modify process at existing facility) NAICS Code: 327993

Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: CALHOUN Facility State: MI Facility ZIP Code: 492241440 Permit Issued By: MICHIGAN DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (Agency Name) MS. DANITA BRANDT(Agency Contact) (517) 373-7034 BRANDTD@MICHIGAN.GOV Other Agency Contact Info: PERMIT ENGINEER: STEPHEN ZERVAS TELEPHONE NUMBER: 517-373-7083 Permit Notes: PERMIT IS FOR ADDITION OF A NEW LINE. THIS PERMIT REPLACED 282-02 (MI-0374)



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MATERIAL HANDLING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS IS THE SAME PROCESS AS IN ORIGINAL PERMIT. NO CHANGE IN EMISSIONS. SEE RBLC ID MI-0374.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY 6-MINUTE AVERAGE

Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: N/A Control Method: (A) INDOOR OPERATIONS AND SOME BAGHOUSE CONTROLS. Est. % Efficiency: 95.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: OPACITY LIMIT OF 10 PERCENT BASED ON A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE. NO CHANGE FROM ORIGINAL PERMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: ELECTRIC MELT UNITS 1 THROUGH 7 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS IS THE SAME PROCESS AS IN ORIGINAL PERMIT. NO CHANGE IN EMISSIONS. SEE RBLC ID MI-0374.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/1000 LB EXHAUST - TEST PROTOCOL Emission Limit 2: 2.0800 LB/H Standard Emission: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED MACT LIMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 95.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO CHANGE FROM THE ORIGINAL PERMIT. 0.5 LB/TGP LIMIT IS MACT LIMIT.

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: ELECTRIC MELT UNIT NO. 8 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: THIS IS A NEW UNIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0170 LB/1000 LB Emission Limit 2: 0.9200 LB/H Standard Emission: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS - MACT LIMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , MACT Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 95.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THIS IS A NEW UNIT. AVG. TIME/CONDITIONS FOR BOTH LIMITS ARE SPECIFIED IN TEST PROTOCOL. LIMIT 1 IS LB/1000 LB OF DRY EXHAUST GAS. 0.50 LB/TGP LIMIT IS MACT LIMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED FIBERGLASS INSULATION FORMING AND COLLECTION Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 108.00 T/D

Process Notes: THIS IS SAME PROCESS AS IN ORIGINAL PERMIT. NO INCREASE IN EMISSIONS. SEE RBLC ID MI-0374.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 125.0000 T/YR ROLLING 12-MONTH Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: SAME AS ORIGINAL PERMIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/1000 LB EXHAUST TEST PROTOCOL Emission Limit 2: 12.8000 LB/H TEST PROTOCOL Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO CHANGE FROM ORIGINAL PERMIT. STANDARD LIMIT (LB/TGP) DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS INDIVIDUAL PROCESS. INSULATION FORMING AND COLLECTION AND INSULATION CURING ARE LIMITED TOGETHER TO A COMBINED 11.0 LB/TGP IN THE PERMIT UNDER RESINATED LINE NO. 1. (NSPS)



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED FIBERGLASS INSULATION CURINGPROCESS NAME: RESINATED FIBERGLASS INSULATION CURING

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 108.00 T/D

Process Notes: THIS IS SAME PROCESS AS IN ORIGINAL PERMIT. NO CHANGE IN EMISSIONS. SEE RBLC ID MI-0374.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/1000 LB EXHAUST TEST PROTOCOL Emission Limit 2: 7.9100 LB/H TEST PROTOCOL Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , NSPS Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTERATION/WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO CHANGE FROM ORIGINAL PERMIT. STANDARD LIMIT (LB/TGP) DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS INDIVIDUAL PROCESS. INSULATION FORMING AND COLLECTION AND INSULATION CURING ARE LIMITED TOGETHER TO A COMBINED 11.0 LB/TGP IN THE PERMIT UNDER RESINATED LINE NO. 1.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED LINE NO. 1 - VOCS Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 108.00 T/D

Process Notes: THIS IS AN EMISSION UNIT TO GROUP ALL VOC EMISSIONS FROM THE LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOCTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 140.0000 T/YR 12-MONTH ROLLLING Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: ALL VOC EMISSIONS FOR LINE 1 WERE COMBINED IN ONE LIMIT. THIS IS AN INCREASE IN EMISSIONS FROM THE ORIGINAL PERMIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.0000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 11.0000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , MACT , SIP Control Method: (A) WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: LB/HR LIMITS ARE ON THE INDIVIDUAL PROCESSES (INSULATION FORMING AND COLLECTION AND INSULATION CURING). LB/TGP LIMIT IS NSPS SUBPART PPP.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED LINE NO. 2 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 96.00 T/D

Process Notes: THIS IS A NEW LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 124.4000 T/YR 12-MONTH ROLLING Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: MACT , SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THIS IS AN INCREASE IN VOC EMISSIONS FOR A NEW LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0360 LB/1000 LB Emission Limit 2: 19.2000 LB/H Standard Emission: 11.0000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , NSPS , MACT Control Method: (A) WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THIS IS AN INCREASE IN PM10 EMISSIONS FOR A NEW LINE. AVG. TIME/CONDITIONS FOR BOTH LIMITS ARE DEFINED IN TEST PROTOCOL. LIMIT 1 IS LB/1000 LB OF DRY EXHAUST GAS. LB/TGP LIMIT IS NSPS SUBPART PPP.

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: NON-RESINATED FORMING AND COLLECTION Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 119.00 T/D

Process Notes: THIS IS SAME PROCESS AS IN ORIGINAL PERMIT. FOR PM10 EMISSIONS SEE RBLC ID MI-0374.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/1000 LB EXHAUST TEST PROTOCOL Emission Limit 2: 8.9200 LB/H TEST PROTOCOL Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NO CHANGE FROM ORIGINAL PERMIT. LB/TGP LIMIT DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS PROCESS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 50.0000 T/YR 12-MONTH ROLLING Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIPControl Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THIS IS AN INCREASE IN VOC EMISSIONS FROM EXISTING PROCESS.



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## OH-0296 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 10/05/2005 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL Permit Number: 04-01345 Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE PLANT 1 Permit Date: 05/20/2004 (actual) Facility Contact: RON HUDSON 4198781584 FRS Number: 110004616201 Facility Description: TEXTILE FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: C: Modify process at existing facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: LUCAS Facility State: OH Facility ZIP Code: 435669731 Permit Issued By: OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Agency Name) MS. CHERYL SUTTMAN(Agency Contact) (614)644-3617 CHERYL.SUTTMAN@EPA.STATE.OH.US Permit Notes: THIS IS A MODIFICATION TO THE ELECTRIC BOOST SYSTEM RESULTING IN AN INCREASE IN PRODUCTION. THIS PERMIT WAS PSD FOR PM10 AND FLUORIDES. THIS PERMIT INCLUDED MANY SMALLER SOURCES WHICH WERE NOT ENTERED INTO A PROCESS, THEY INCLUDED: CRUSHER/HAMMER MILL W/ FLUID BED DRYER TO BAGHOUSE; 7 FORMING PRE-BAKE CURING OVENS; 2 CHOP DRYERS; 2 TUNNEL PREBAKE OVENS; 4 DIRECT CHOP OVENS TO BAGHOUSE; 4 DIRECT CHOP CLASSIFIERS TO BAGHOUSE; GYPSUM LINE OVEN W/ BAGHOUSE; AND FINISHING DEPARTMENT W/ BAGHOUSE. THIS PERMIT INCLUDED COMBINED ROLLING 12-MONTH LIMITS FOR BOTH FURNACES TOGETHER, THAT WERE SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL TPY LIMITS (LOWER BY 1 TO 2 T). THESE LIMITS WERE NOT WORTH INCLUDING FOR THIS MINIMAL DIFFERENCE.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS MELTING FURNACE 9211

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS

Throughput: 8.00 T Glass/H

Process Notes: NATURAL GAS OXYFUEL FIRING AND ELECTRIC BOOST, CONTROLLED BY WET CAUSTIC SCRUBBER AND FABRIC FILTER.

MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 69,350 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9211.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.7100 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 60.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.0200 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 71.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) QUENCH TOWER WITH CAUSTIC INJECTION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 1.4000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 13.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) QUENCH TOWER WITH CAUSTIC INJECTION AND BAGHOUSE W/ NOMEX FILTER MEDIA TO IMPROVE F CONDENSATION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8700 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 66.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: 1.8700 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 17.3400 T/YR Standard Emission: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP , NSPS Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHSStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FROM STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FROM STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS MELTING FURNACE 9212

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8.40 T Glass/H

Process Notes: NATURAL GAS OXYFUEL FIRING AND ELECTRIC BOOST, CONTROLLED BY WET CAUSTIC SCRUBBER AND FABRIC FILTER.

MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 73,000 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9212.POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 14.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) QUENCH TOWER WITH CAUSTIC INJECTION AND BAGHOUSE W/ NOMEX FILTER MEDIA TO IMPROVE F CONDENSATION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.7100 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 63.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) )

Emission Limit 1: 2.0200 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 75.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) QUENCH TOWER WITH CAUSTIC INJECTION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 1.5000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8700 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 69.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: 1.8700 LB/T GLASS PULLEDDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 18.2500 T/YR Standard Emission: 0.5000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: RACT Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS , SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 0.3700 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FROM STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE FROM STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER Est. % Efficiency: 80.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS FOREHEARTH AREA 9211

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8.00 T Glass/H

Process Notes: FIBERGLASS FOREHEARTH AREA WITH NATURAL GAS OVER FIRING AND NO CONTROLS. MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE

PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 69,350 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9211.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0110 LB/T GLASS PULLEDEmission Limit 2: 0.3900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS

Standard Emission: 0.0110 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8800 T/YR Standard Emission: 0.0300 LB/TON GLASS CALCULATED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.8000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 7.9000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements: SIP

Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 9.2000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.5300 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0380 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 1.3200 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS FOREHEARTH AREA 9212

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8.40 T Glass/H

Process Notes: FIBERGLASS FOREHEARTH AREA WITH NATURAL GAS OVER FIRING AND NO CONTROLS. MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE

PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 73,000 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9212.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0110 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 0.4100 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: 0.0110 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency:Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.8800 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.9000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 8.3000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 9.6000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )Emission Limit 1: 0.1300 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 0.5700 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0380 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 1.3900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS FORMING AREA 9211

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8.00 T Glass/H

Process Notes: FIBERGLASS FORMING AREA WITH ROLLED-ON BINDER APPLICATION AND NO CONTROLS. MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE

PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 69,350 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9211.

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0210 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 0.7300 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VETest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 3.2000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHSStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 7.0000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: 0.2000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS FORMING AREA 9212

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8.40 T Glass/H

Process Notes: FIBERGLASS FORMING AREA WITH ROLLED-ON BINDER APPLICATION AND NO CONTROLS. MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE

PRODUCTION RATE NOT TO EXCEED 73,000 TONS OF GLASS PULLED PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS FOR GLASS FURNACE 9212.POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 7.3000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: 0.2000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable (FPM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/T GLASS PULLED

Emission Limit 2: 3.3000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorine

CAS Number: 7782-41-4 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0210 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: 0.7700 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: % OPACITY NO VE FROM EXHAUST STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UCase-by-Case Basis:

Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## KS-0027 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 04/13/2005 Corporate/Company Name: CERTAINTEED CORPORATION Permit Number: 209-0001 Facility Name: CERTAINTEED FACILITY IN KANSAS CITY Permit Date: 01/30/2004 (actual) Facility Contact: JIM EASON 9133426624 JIM.L.EASON@SAINT-GOBAIN.COM FRS Number: Facility Description: GLASS FIBER MANUFACTURING SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 7 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: WYANDOTTE Facility State: KS Facility ZIP Code: 66115 Permit Issued By: KANSAS CITY/WYANDOTTE CO HEALTH DEPT, KS (Agency Name) MR. BRUCE ANDERSON(Agency Contact) (913) 573-6700 BANDERSON@WYCOKCK.ORG Other Agency Contact Info: BRUCE ANDERSON KS (913) 573-6700 Permit Notes: CERTAINTEED IS PROPOSING TO EXPAND THE CURRENT K-2 GLASS MELTING FURNACE AND INSTALL A NEW UNBONDED WOOL FIBERGLASS INSULATION MANUFACTURING LINE AT ITS EXISTING KANSAS CITY, KANSAS FACILITY. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE COMPRISED OF (A) THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING GLASS MELTING FURNACE AND (B) THE ADDITION OF A NEW MANUFACTURING LINE TO PRODUCE UNBONDED GLASS FIBER INSULATION MATERIAL.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: UNBONDED WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURINGProcess Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 72.00 TONNE/D

Process Notes: EMISSIONS FROM BAGGING OPERATIONS WERE ROUTED TO THE FORMING SECTION EMISSIONS STACK

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.4000 LB/T LB/US TON OF GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 2.4000 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) WATER SPRAYS ARE USED TO CONTROL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS FROM THE FORMING SECTION. WATER SPRAYS ARE AN INHERENT PART OF THE PROCESS TO COOL GLASS FIBERS IN THE FORMING SECTION. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: A FILTER PARTIALLY REMOVES SOLIDS FROM THE WASH WATER.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS MELTING

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 72.00 TONNE/D

Process Notes: A BACT LIMIT FOR THE K-2 FURNACE WAS SET TO 0.36 POUNDS OF PM10 PER US TON OF GLASS PULLED (5.6 LB/HR) BECAUSE

THE FURNACE WAS A MODIFIED FURNACE AND NOT A NEW FURNACE. THE OLD FURNACE HAD THE SAME LIMIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.3600 LB/T LB/US TON OF GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.3600 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## MI-0374 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 08/13/2007 Corporate/Company Name: GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS, INC. Permit Number: 282-02 Facility Name: GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS, INC. Permit Date: 12/18/2003 (actual) Facility Contact: GROVER THOMAS 5176299464 FRS Number: 110000409923 Facility Description: MANUFACTURER OF FIBERGLASS INSULATION SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: C: Modify process at existing facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: CALHOUN Facility State: MI Facility ZIP Code: 492241440 Permit Issued By: MICHIGAN DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (Agency Name) MS. DANITA BRANDT(Agency Contact) (517) 373-7034 BRANDTD@MICHIGAN.GOV Other Agency Contact Info: PERMIT ENGINEER: STEPHEN ZERVAS PHONE NUMBER: 517-373-7083 Permit Notes: PERMIT IS FOR INCREASE IN PRODUCTION. THIS PERMIT WAS VOIDED WHEN 282-02A WAS ISSUED. SEE MI-0375 FOR UPDATED EMISSION INFORMATION.

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MATERIAL HANDLING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 10.0000 % OPACITY SEE PROCESS NOTE Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 10.0000 % OPACITY Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: N/A Control Method: (A) INDOOR OPERATIONS AND SOME BAGHOUSE CONTROL Est. % Efficiency: 95.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: LIMIT IS 10 PERCENT OPACITY ON A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: ELECTRIC MELT UNITS 1 THROUGH 7 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 227.00 T/D

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/1000 LB Emission Limit 2: 2.0800 LB/H Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 95.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: AVERAGING TIME/CONDITIONS FOR BOTH LIMITS ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TEST PROTOCOL. LIMIT 1 IS LB/1000 LB DRY EXHAUST GAS. LB/TGP LIMIT DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS PROCESS.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED FIBERGLASS INSULATION FORMING AND COLLECTION Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 108.00 T/D

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0400 LB/1000 LB EXHAUST Emission Limit 2: 12.8000 LB/H Standard Emission: 7.0000 LB/T GLASS - NSPS LIMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes: AVERAGING TIME/CONDITIONS FOR BOTH LIMITS ARE DEFINED IN TEST PROTOCOL. 7.0 LB/TGP LIMIT IS NSPS LIMIT.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 125.0000 T/YR 12-MONTH ROLLING Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: RESINATED FIBERGLASS INSULATION CURING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 108.00 T/D

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/1000 LB DRY EXHAUST Emission Limit 2: 7.9100 LB/H Standard Emission: 4.0000 LB/T GLASS - NSPS LIMIT Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: NCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTRATION/WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: AVG. TIME/CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN TEST PROTOCOL. 4.0 LB/TGP LIMIT IS NSPS LIMIT.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: NON-RESINATED FORMING AND COLLECTION Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 119.00 T/D

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/1000 LB DRY EXHAU Emission Limit 2: 8.9200 LB/H Standard Emission: NOT APPLICABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (A) WET SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: 90.000 Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: AVG. TIME/CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN TEST PROTOCOL. LB/TGP LIMIT DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS PROCESS.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: 31.0000 T/YR 12-MONTH ROLLING Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: N Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## TX-0460 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 09/26/2007 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INC Permit Number: P1025 Facility Name: CLEBURNE PLANT Permit Date: 11/20/2003 (actual) Facility Contact: MR. JARED KERNEY 8175566659 FRS Number: 110017693156 Facility Description: FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING PLANT SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327993 Permit URL: EPA Region: 6 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: JOHNSON Facility State: TX Facility ZIP Code: Permit Issued By: TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (TCEQ) (Agency Name) RANDY HAMILTON(Agency Contact) (512) 239-1512 RHAMILTO@TCEQ.STATE.TX.US Permit Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE 92 AND 93 FILTERS Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))Process Type: 90.015 (Glass Fiber Manufacturing (except 90.033))

Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 33.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 146.7300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 21.6100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 94.6400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 11.7600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 51.5100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.5300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 28.6500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 57.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 251.6700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 36.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 157.6800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 37.2300 T/YR Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.1200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 18.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Methanol

CAS Number: 67-56-1 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 16.1500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: GLASS FURNACES Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 35.7400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0700 T/YR Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 14.3500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 62.8500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.8500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 30.0000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 2.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 8.7600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrogen Fluoride

CAS Number: 7664-39-3 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: 1901 FOREHEARTH (4) AND 1902 FURNACE FOREHEARTH (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER SET

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.8000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.1000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 6.4000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: 1901 FORMING AREA Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.4400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 6.3100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 19.2000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: 1901 BATCH PLANT (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.2800 T/YR Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MIXING BINS (2) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0140 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: WET SCRUBBERS 1-4PROCESS NAME: WET SCRUBBERS 1-4

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER SCRUBBER

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 16.4300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.8400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 14.0300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 5.6500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0Test Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 9.1500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 40.0800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 4.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 15.3300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2900 T/YRStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.9000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OVEN WET SCRUBBER Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 19.7500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 31.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 15.3300 T/YRStandard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 22.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 97.5900 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 6.6900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 29.3000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 7.6700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 4.3800 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BAGHOUSE 1 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 3.2400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.1600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 31.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.4500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3000 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: BAGHOUSE 2-9PROCESS NAME: BAGHOUSE 2-9

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER STACK

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.1300 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: WASTE RE-FEED BAGHOUSE (2) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: EMISSIONS ARE PER BAG

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0300 LB/HEmission Limit 2: 0.0120 T/YR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OFF-LINE WAST BAGHOUSE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3600 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: E-GLASS RECLAIM AREA (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.6200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 2.7200 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.9700 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N)Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.4400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)

CAS Number: 7446-09-5 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Sulfur (SOx) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.0100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Ammonia (NH3)

CAS Number: 7664-41-7 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.4400 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.3500 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: OFFLINE GROOVING MACHINE (4) Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)Primary Fuel:

Throughput:

Process Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 0.6100 T/YR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## OH-0293 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 08/23/2006 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL Permit Number: 03-13943 Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE DEFIANCE, PLANT 2 Permit Date: 05/22/2003 (actual) Facility Contact: DAN CLARK 4197847032 FRS Number: 110000383549 Facility Description: FIBER GLASS INSULATION MANUFACTURING SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: C: Modify process at existing facility NAICS Code: 320000 Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: DEFIANCE Facility State: OH Facility ZIP Code: 435127218Permit Issued By: OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (Agency Name) MS. CHERYL SUTTMAN(Agency Contact) (614)644-3617 CHERYL.SUTTMAN@EPA.STATE.OH.US Permit Notes: MODIFICATION TO TWO (OF 6) FIBER GLASS PRODUCTION LINES TO INCREASE THEIR CAPACITY TO MELT MORE MARBLES AND PRODUCE A WIDER VARIETY OF PRODUCTS. THIS PERMIT WAS PSD FOR CO.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBER GLASS FORMING AND COLLECTION, LINE 23

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS

Throughput: 1593120.00 lb/rolling 12-months

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS ANNUAL GLASS PULL RATE AND PRODUCTION RESTRICTION FOR LINE 24 OF: 780,000 LB/ROLLING 12-MONTHS

IS THE MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE GLASS PULL RATE FOR LOW-MEDIUM EFFICIENCY PRODUCTS; AND 813,120 LB/ROLLING 12-MONTHS IS THE MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE GLASS PULL RATE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PRODUCTS NOT RELATED TO AIRCRAFT/AEROSPACE PRODUCTION. IN THE APPLICATION IT WAS DETERMINED THAT 40 CFR 60 SUBPART PPP WAS NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS UNIT BECAUSE IT IS AN EXISTING FLAME ATTENUATION FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING PROCESS. SUBPART PPP IS FOR A ROTARY SPIN WOOL FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 9.9200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 29.7300 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE ANDPollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE. TESTING FOR PM AND PM10 WILL USE THE FRONT AND BACK HALF OF THE METHOD 5 SAMPLE TRAIN, TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PM/PM10 LIMIT. ALL PM IS ASSUMED TO BE PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrocarbons, Total

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Organic Compounds (all) , Organic Non-HAP Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 5.1200 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 21.4100 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS, FOR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.3200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 16.8400 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE ANDPollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorides, Total

CAS Number: 16984-48-8 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3900 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 1.0400 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE. LIMIT IS FOR FLUORIDES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, ANY STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, ANY STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 74.7300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 262.8700 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBER GLASS FORMING AND COLLECTION, LINE 24

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS

Throughput: 1685760.00 lb/rolling 12-months

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS ANNUAL GLASS PULL RATE AND PRODUCTION RESTRICTION FOR LINE 24 OF: 1,200,000 LB/ROLLING 12-MONTHS

IS THE MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE GLASS PULL RATE FOR AIRCRAFT/AEROSPACE PRODUCTS; AND 485,760 LB/ROLLING 12-MONTHS IS THE MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE GLASS PULL RATE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PRODUCTS NOT RELATED TO AIRCRAFT/AEROSPACE PRODUCTION. IN THE APPLICATION IT WAS DETERMINED THAT 40 CFR 60 SUBPART PPP WAS NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS UNIT BECAUSE IT IS AN EXISTING FLAME ATTENUATION FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING PROCESS. SUBPART PPP IS FOR A ROTARY SPIN WOOL FIBER GLASS MANUFACTURING LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Fluorides, Total

CAS Number: 16984-48-8 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Emission Limit 1: 0.2600 LB/H

Emission Limit 2: 1.1000 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE. LIMIT IS FOR FLUORIDES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, ANY STACK Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 20.0000 % OPACITY AS A 6-MINUTE AVERAGE, ANY STACK Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 99.6300 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 246.6900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UDid factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.2800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 34.8900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE. TESTING FOR PM AND PM10 WILL USE THE FRONT AND BACK HALF OF THE METHOD 5 SAMPLE TRAIN, TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PM/PM10 LIMIT. ALL PM IS ASSUMED TO BE PM10.

POLLUTANT NAME: Hydrocarbons, Total

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Organic Compounds (all) , Organic Non-HAP Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 6.8200 LB/H SEE NOTES Emission Limit 2: 26.2900 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UCase-by-Case Basis:

Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS, FOR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.1400 LB/H Emission Limit 2: 17.5600 T/YR PER ROLLING 12-MONTHS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: Other Applicable Requirements: SIP Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: No Pollutant/Compliance Notes: THESE LIMITS ARE BASED UPON THE MAXIMUM HOURLY PRODUCTION RATE AND RESTRICTION ON THE ROLLING 12-MONTHS GLASS PULL RATE.



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## WV-0017 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 06/21/2004 Corporate/Company Name: GUARDIAN FIBERGLASS, INC. Permit Number: R14-0015 Facility Name: INWOOD Permit Date: 04/05/2002 (actual) Facility Contact: JOHN STOTTLENYER 3042676885 FRS Number: 110000604052 Facility Description: WOOL FIBERGLASS MANUFACTURING FACILITY SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: D: Both B (Add new process to existing facility) &C (Modify process at existing facility) NAICS Code: 327993Permit URL:

EPA Region: 3 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: BERKELEY Facility State: WV Facility ZIP Code: 25428 Permit Issued By: WEST VIRGINIA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMM (Agency Name) MR. JOE KESSLER(Agency Contact) (304)926-3727 jkessler@mail.dep.state.wv.us Other Agency Contact Info: JOE KESSLER 7012 MACCORKLE AVE., SE CHARLESTON, WV 25304 (304) 926-3647 Permit Notes: Facility consists of two wool fiberglass production lines. 1st line produces 7,500 lb/hr of resinated fiberglass insulation; 2nd line produces 8,000 lb/hr of fiberglass insulation. Facility will be subject to 40 CFR 63 Subpart NNN upon start-up of the 2nd line.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: CURING & COOLING OF 2ND PRODUCTION LINE

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: Curing Oven is vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) & cooling table is vented to a venturi scrubber. Throughput is lb of glass per hour.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3100 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency:Compliance Verified: Yes

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.5100 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) COMBUSTION CONTROLS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0770 LB/T LB PM/ TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.0770 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) COOLING TABLE IS VENTED TO A FISHER-KLOSTERMAN NO. MS-650H VENTURI SCRUBBER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)CAS Number: VOC

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0900 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) MCGILL AIR CLEAN THERMAL OXIDIZER MODEL MCT 30.0 Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0170 LB/T LB HCOH/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0170 LB/T LB PHENOL/TON GLASSEmission Limit 2:

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MELTING AND REFINING OF 2ND PRODUCTION LINE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: Throughput is lb of glass per hour.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7280 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)CAS Number: 10102

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0240 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) ELECTRIC ARC MELTER/COMBUSTION CONTROLS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0240 LB/T LB PM/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.0240 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2150 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASSEmission Limit 2:

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: Other Case-by-Case Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING AND COLLECTION OF THE 2ND PRODUCTION LINE

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 8000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: 5.5 mmBtu/hr forehearth and 9 fiberizer line is permitted to produce 4000 lb/hr of non-resinated insulation and 2000 lb/hr of resinated insulation with

a maximum production of 8000 lb of glass/hr.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1300 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4200 LB/T LB/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0830 LB/T LB/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 4.5900 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.2500 LB/T LB PM/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.2500 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) THREE VENTURI SCRUBBERS IN PARALLEL Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2030 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) COMBUSTION CONTROLS/MONITOR A/F RATIO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FORMING AND COLLECTION OF THE 1ST PRODUCTION LINE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 7500.00 LB/H

Process Notes: 5.5 mmbtu/hr forehearth and 7 fiberizer producing 7500 wool fiberglass insulation

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 4.5900 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) MONITORING AIR-TO-FUEL RATIO TO OPTIMIZE COMBUSTION Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 3.4700 LB/T LB PM/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.4700 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) DROP OUT BOXES W/ WATER SPRAYER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2030 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) COMBUSTION CONTROLS/MONITORING A/F RATIO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1300 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3630 LB/T LB/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: MELTING AND REFINING OF 1ST PRODUCTION LINE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 7500.00 LB/H

Process Notes: 7500 lb/hr electric arc melter

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 0.7280 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) ELECTRIC ARC MELTER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0610 LB/T LB PM/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.0610 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: 99.000 Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0230 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) ELECTRIC ARC MELTER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2160 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) ELECTRIC ARC MELTER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: CURING & COOLING OF 1ST PRODUCTION LINE Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 7500.00 LB/H

Process Notes: 18 mmbtu/hr curing oven and cooling table vented to a regenerative thermal oxidizer, throughput is lb glass per hour.

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: UnspecifiedPollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) )

Emission Limit 1: 3.0100 LB/T LB NOX/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) COMBUSTION CONTROLS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.3700 LB/T LB PM/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 1.3700 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Formaldehyde

CAS Number: 50-00-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0240 LB/T LB/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission:Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown

Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Phenol

CAS Number: 108-95-2 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) , Organic Compounds (all) , Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0130 LB/T LB/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (A) RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.0770 LB/T LB VOC/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) RTOEst. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.1300 LB/T LB CO/TON GLASS Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) UNITED MCGILL RTO Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## GA-0119 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 07/18/2005 Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL Permit Number: 3246-013-0005-P-01-0 Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE Permit Date: 09/30/1999 (actual) Facility Contact: PATTI BLEVINS 7708670229 FRS Number: 110000358808 Facility Description: FIBERGLASS INSULATION MANUFACTURING SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: A: New/Greenfield Facility NAICS Code: 327893 Permit URL: EPA Region: 4 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: BARROW Facility State: GA Facility ZIP Code: 306803428Permit Issued By: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (Agency Name) MR. JOHN YNTEMA(Agency Contact) (404)363-7117 john_yntema@dnr.state.ga.us Permit Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE 106 FORMING

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 1.90 MMBTU/H

Process Notes: FORMING CONSISTS OF TWO LINES, EACH USING ONE 1.9 MMBTU/HR NATURAL GAS BURNER. EMISSIONS ARE CONTROLLED

WITH A VENTURI SCRUBBER AND WET ESP FOR EACH LINE.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 12.1470 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) VENTURI SCRUBBERS AND WET ESP Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 87.0000 LB/H EACH (TWO TOTAL) Emission Limit 2:Emission Limit 2:

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) NATURAL GAS OR PROPANE ONLY Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 19 MMBTU/HR BURNER EACH

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 9.4500 LB/H EACH (TWO TOTAL) Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) VENTURI SCRUBBER AND WESP Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 12.2400 LB/H EACH (TWO TOTAL) Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (P) NATURAL GAS AND PROPANE ONLY Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE 106 CURING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 6.60 MMBTU

Process Notes: 6.6 MMBTU/HR NATURAL GAS/PROPANE CURING OVEN AND COOLING CONVEYOR

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.3380 LB/H CURING OVEN Emission Limit 2: 0.9800 LB/H COOLING CONVEYOR Standard Emission: NOT AVAILABLE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: NSPS Control Method: (A) REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

CAS Number: 10102 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds , Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) , Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 12.3000 LB/H CURING OVENEmission Limit 2: 1.3000 LB/H COOLING CONVEYOR

Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) LOW NOX BURNERS ON CURING OVEN Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: FIRES NATURAL GAS OR PROPANE ONLY 6.6 MMBTU/HR

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.9790 LB/H CURING OVEN Emission Limit 2: 1.9700 LB/H COOLING CONVEYOR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) NATURAL GAS AND PROPANE ONLY Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: NATURAL GAS AND PROPANE FIRED CURING OVEN 6.6 MMBTU/HR

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2270 LB/H FROM CURING OVEN Emission Limit 2: 2.4810 LB/H FROM COOLING CONVEYOR Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDOther Applicable Requirements:

Control Method: (A) REGENERATIVE THERMAL OXIDIZER Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: 6.6 MMBTU/HR



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: LINE 106 RAW MATERIAL HANDLING Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: RAW MATERIAL STORAGE CONTROLLED BY BAGHOUSES

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: SEE NOTE Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: U Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSES Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: RACT IS USE OF BAGHOUSES ON VARIOUS SOURCES. RAW MATERIAL STORAGE, AND MELTERS CONTROLLED BY VARIOUS BAGHOUSES



## Facility Information

RBLC ID: 

## IN-0084 (final) Date Determination Last Updated: 03/07/2003Corporate/Company Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Permit Number: CP-177-5873

Facility Name: JOHNS MANVILLE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Permit Date: 04/22/1999 (actual) Facility Contact: FRS Number: 110000573772 Facility Description: SIC Code: 3296 Permit Type: D: Both B (Add new process to existing facility) &C (Modify process at existing facility) NAICS Code: 327993

Permit URL: EPA Region: 5 COUNTRY: USA Facility County: WAYNE Facility State: IN Facility ZIP Code: 47374 Permit Issued By: INDIANA DEPT OF ENV MGMT, OFC OF AIR (Agency Name) MS. NISHA SIZEMORE(Agency Contact) (317) 232-8356 NSIZEMOR@IDEM.IN.GOV Other Agency Contact Info: MICHELE WILLIAMS IN (317) 233-0863 Permit Notes: THE COMPANY IS MAKING MODIFICATIONS TO THE FORMING CHAMBERS TO MANUFACTURE A MORE CONSISTENT WOOL FIBERGLASS PRODUCT. THIS WILL ALSO INCREASE THE PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES.



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD., MELT FURNACE, NAT GAS, LINE 3

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: STACK TESTING FOR PM,PM10,NOX. THROUGHPUT IS LBS GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. NOX AND SO2 BELOW PSD

THRESHOLD LEVELS. NOX = 3.41 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0.2 LB/HR

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2:Standard Emission: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements:Control Method: (N)

Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING, CURING, COOLING, LINE 3

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: For bonded product. ADDITIONAL SCC CODE: 30501209. THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. Limits for other pollutants

(PM10, CO, & VOC) are in separate line 3 bonded processes.

POLLUTANT NAME: Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

CAS Number: HAP Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) )Emission Limit 1: 2.2800 LB/H SINGLE HAP

Emission Limit 2: 5.7100 LB/H COMBINED HAPS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY BINDER MIX HAS INHERENTLY LOWER HAPS. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: HAPS ARE FORMALDEHYDE AND PHENOL. LIMIT BASIS IS INDIANA STATE MACT: 326 IAC 2-1-3.4



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING CHAMBER, UNBONDED, LINE 6

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO. LINE 6 CAN PRODUCE EITHER

BONDED OR UNBONDED PRODUCT. DIFFERENT LIMITS ARE ESTABLISHED FOR EACH PRODUCT. NOX AND SO2 ARE BELOW PSD SIGNIFICANT THRESHOLD LEVELS. LINE 6 NOX = 2.18 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0 LB/HR TO AVOID PSD.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 25.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: UnknownPollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOCTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7700 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY PRODUCT MIX INHERENTLY HAS LOWER VOC/HAP EMISSIONS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING CHAMBER, BONDED, LINE 6

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, CO, HAP. NOX AND SO2 ARE BELOW PSD

THRESHOLDS

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 7.8400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency:Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.6600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY PRODUCT MIX HAS INHERENTLY LOWER VOC/HAP EMISSIONS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 25.3000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 7.8400 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, HOUSEKEEPING SYSTEM Process Type: 29.900 (Other Waste Processing & Disposal Processes) Primary Fuel: Throughput:

Process Notes: COLD END HOUSEKEEPING SYSTEM. FOR THROUGHPUT, SEE OTHER PROCESSES.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSEEst. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5100 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 3.0000 % OPACITY Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.0000 % OPACITY Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) BAGHOUSE Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, CURING PROCESS, BONDED, LINE 6

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO, HAP. NOX AND SO2 ARE BELOW

PSD THRESHOLDS. NOX = 0.84 LB/HR, SO2 = 0 LB/HR TO AVOID PSD.

POLLUTANT NAME: Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

CAS Number: HAP Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.2800 LB/H SINGLE HAP Emission Limit 2: 5.7100 LB/H COMBINED HAPS Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: MACT Other Applicable Requirements: MACT Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY BINDER MIX IS INHERENTLY LOWER IN HAPS. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes: HAPS ARE FORMALDEHYDE AND PHENOL. LIMIT BASIS IS INDIANA STATE MACT (3261AC 2-1-3.4)

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.5000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSDCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) LOW VOC PRODUCT MIX Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 1.9900 LB/T Emission Limit 2: 0.0200 GR/DSCF Standard Emission: 1.9900 LB/T Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTER (HEAF), WATER SPRAY Est. % Efficiency:Compliance Verified: Unknown

Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING, BONDED, LINE 6 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: ADDITIONAL SCC CODE: 30501208. THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. NOx and SO2 avoid PSD

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 7.8400 LB/T lb/t glass pulled Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 7.8400 LB/T lb/t glass pulled Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTER (HEAF), WATER SPRAY Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 8.6600 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: UnknownCase-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD

Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) LOW VOC PRODUCT MIX Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 25.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PRODUCTION, ELECTRIC MELTER, LINE 6

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 4000.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB OF GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX. NOX AND SO2 BELOW PSD SIGNIFICANT

THRESHOLD LEVELS. NOX = 0.08 LB/HR, SO2 = 0.11 LB/HR TO AVOID PSD.

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PMTest Method: Unspecified

Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.4500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER. EMISSION LIMIT UNITS IN LB/TON GLASS PULLED Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.8500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2:Standard Emission:

Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.4500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.4500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) FABRIC FILTER. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD., FORMING CHAMBER, UNBONDED,LINE 2

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB UNBONDED GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR, STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO. NOX AND SO2 BELOW

PSD THRESHOLD LEVELS. NOX = 2.03 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0 LB/HR TO AVOID PSD. LINE 2 CAN ONLY PRODUCE UNBONDED PRODUCT.POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) WATER SPRAY AND ENCLOSURE. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) WATER SPRAY AND ENCLOSURE. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) )

Emission Limit 1: 6.7800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 21.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING CHAMBER, UNBOND, LINE 3

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 7200.00 LB/HProcess Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO. LINE 3 CAN PRODUCE BONDED AND UNBONDED PRODUCT. THERE ARE DIFFERENT LIMITS ESTABLISHED FOR EACH PRODUCT. NOX AND SO2 ARE BELOW PSD THRESHOLD LEVELS. LINE 3 NOX = 2.03 LB/H, LINE 3 SO2 = 0 LB/H TO AVOID PSD.

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 6.7800 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 21.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)CAS Number: PM

Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.7000 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, FORMING CHAMBER, BONDED, LINE 3 Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel:Primary Fuel:

Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 18.6000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY PRODUCT MIX INHERENTLY HAS LOWER VOC/HAP EMISSIONS. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 2.1900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 21.0000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 2.1900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 2.1900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURE AND WATER SPRAY. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, CURING PROCESS, BONDED, LINE 3Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Primary Fuel: Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO, HAPS. NOX AND SO2 ARE BELOW

PSD THRESHOLD. LINE 3 CURING NOX = 1.51 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0 LB/HR

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 1.2200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 4.2500 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY PRODUCT MIX IS INHERENTLY HAS LOWER VOC/HAP EMISSIONS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.5600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTER (HEAF). Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.5600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.5600 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY AIR FILTER (HEAF). Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant InformationPROCESS

NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, COOLING PROCESS, BONDED, LINE 3

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS LB GLASS PRODUCED/HR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX, VOC, CO, HAP. NOX AND SO2 EMISSIONS BELOW

PSD THRESHOLD. NOX = 0.46 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0 TO AVOID PSD.

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7000 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.2900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HIGH EFFICIENCY FILTER (HEAF).Est. % Efficiency:

Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.7200 LB/H Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (P) PROPRIETARY PRODUCT MIX INHERENTLY HAS LOWER VOC/HAP EMISSIONS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.2900 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) HEAF. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, RAW MATERIAL HANDLING

Process Type: 90.024 (Non-metallic Mineral Processing (except 90.011, 90.019, 90.017, 90.026)) Primary Fuel: Throughput: 0

Process Notes: ADDITIONAL SCC CODES: 30501222 - RAW MATERIAL: STORAGE BINS AND 30501222 - RAW MATERIAL: MIXING/WEIGHING.

Limit for VE only.

POLLUTANT NAME: Visible Emissions (VE)

CAS Number: VE Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): Emission Limit 1: 3.0000 % OPACITY Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 3.0000 % OPACITY Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ENCLOSURES OR FABRIC FILTERS Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Unknown Pollutant/Compliance Notes:



## Process/Pollutant Information

PROCESS NAME: FIBERGLASS PROD, MELT FURNACE, NATURAL GAS, LINE 2

Process Type: 90.033 (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing) Primary Fuel: NATURAL GAS Throughput: 7200.00 LB/H

Process Notes: THROUGHPUT IS 7200 LBS GLASS PRODUCED PER HOUR. STACK TEST FOR PM, PM10, NOX. NOX AND SO2 BELOW PSD

THRESHOLD LEVELS. NOX = 3.41 LB/HR AND SO2 = 0.2 LB/HR TO AVOID REQUIREMENTS OF PSD.POLLUTANT NAME: Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

CAS Number: VOC Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.3800 LB/T lb/t glass pulled Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate Matter (PM)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Carbon Monoxide

CAS Number: 630-08-0 Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )Pollutant Group(s): ( InOrganic Compounds )

Emission Limit 1: 0.8500 LB/T lb/t glass pulled Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (N) Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes:

POLLUTANT NAME: Particulate matter, filterable < 10 μ (FPM10)

CAS Number: PM Test Method: Unspecified Pollutant Group(s): ( Particulate Matter (PM) ) Emission Limit 1: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Emission Limit 2: Standard Emission: 0.2500 LB/T GLASS PULLED Did factors, other then air pollution technology considerations influence the BACT decisions: Unknown Case-by-Case Basis: BACT-PSD Other Applicable Requirements: Control Method: (A) ESP. Est. % Efficiency: Compliance Verified: Yes Pollutant/Compliance Notes: