alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BRIAN SCHWEITZER JOHN BOHLINGER

GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOR

STATE CAPITOL • P.O. BOX 200801 • HELENA, MONTANA 59620-0801

TELEPHONE: 406-444-3111 • FAX: 406-444-5529 • WEBSITE: WWW.MT.GOV

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

STATE OF MONTANA

December 8, 2010

James B. Martin

Regional Administrator

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region VIII, 8P-AR

1595 Wynkoop St.

Denver, CO 80202-1129

RE: Montana Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) NAAQS Designations

Dear Mr. Martin:

As you are aware, EPA promulgated a revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 

for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on February 9, 2010 (75 FR 6474). Pursuant to 42 USC §7407, Congress

directs governors to submit a list of areas designating as nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable 

with respect to a new or revised NAAQS. Such lists of designated areas are due no later than one year 

following the promulgation of a new or revised standard.

Montana designates all 56 counties in the state attainment for the revised NO2 NAAQS. The information

provided in the enclosed technical memorandum and the associated enclosure demonstrates that 

Montana’s designation is appropriate for all counties.

We anticipate working with you as we maintain Montana’s status with regard to the revised NO2 NAAQS. 

If you have any questions regarding this action, please contact M. Eric Merchant, the Department’s Air 

Quality Policy and Planning Supervisor, by telephone at (406) 444-1457 or by email at 

emerchant@mt.gov. 

Sincerely,

BRIAN SCHWEITZER

Governor

Enclosure

cc: Richard Opper, Director, Department of Environmental Quality

Dave Klemp, Chief, Air Resources Management Bureau

M. Eric Merchant, Air Resources Management Bureau
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  Y AO R ICHARD S OSSOU , Petitioner,

v. No. 03-1241



# 
J OHNA SHCROFT , Attorney General, Respondent. 

# 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

(A76-924-742) Submitted: September 8, 2003 Decided: November 19, 2003 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Edwin K. Fogam, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. McConnell, Deputy Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Yao Richard Sossou, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review from an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. We have reviewed the record provided by the parties and the decision of the Board. Sossou challenges the negative credibility findings made by the immigration judge and affirmed by the Board. We have reviewed theimmigration judge’s credibility determination and find it to be supported by specific, cogent reasoning and therefore entitled to substantial deference. Figeroa v. INS , 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir. 1989). Wehold that the Board’s conclusion that Sossou failed to establish eligibility for asylum is not manifestly contrary to the law or an abuse of discretion. 8 U.S.C. § 1254(b)(4)(D) (2000).The standard for receiving withholding of removal is "more stringent than that for asylum eligibility." Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). An applicant for withholding must demonstrate a clear probability of persecution. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). As Sossou failed to establish entitlement to asylum, he cannot satisfy the higher standard for withholding of removal. We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED 2 S OSSOU v. A SHCROFT
#### Clifford J. SCHUETT Plaintiff-Appellant v. L. LARIVA, Warden; M. Smith Defendants-Appellees

No. 17-1210

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 7, 2017

Filed: September 12, 2017

Clifford J. Schuett, Pro Se

David W. Fuller, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellees

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this pro se civil-rights action, federal prisoner Clifford Schuett appeals after the District Court1 dismissed his lawsuit without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. He has also moved for appointment of counsel.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we conclude that dismissal was appropriate. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (requiring exhaustion of available administrative remedies before a prisoner may bring a federal action challenging prison conditions under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)); King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir.) (reviewing de novo a dismissal under § 1997e(a)), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 966, 131 S.Ct. 499, 178 L.Ed.2d 296 (2010); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (“Under the plain language of section 1997e(a), an inmate must exhaust administrative remedies *before*filing suit in federal court.”); see also McAlphin v. Toney, 375 F.3d 753, 755 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (“[A] claim falling within the imminent danger exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) must nonetheless meet the mandatory exhaustion requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).”).

We affirm the District Court and deny Schuett’s motion for appointment of counsel.

1

. The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, partially adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota,
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of VendingData Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Steven J. Blad,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and John R. Spina, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  STEVEN J. BLAD                    |   | Dated: | August 19,  2003 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Steven  J. Blad                        |   |   |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer and President |   |   |

 

 
| By:    | /s/  JOHN R. SPINA                     |   | Dated: | August 19,  2003 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | John  R. Spina                         |   |   |
| Title: | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |   |

 

 

Thiscertification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any otherpurpose.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      1,914
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,796
<PP&E>                                           2,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                     598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,467
<SALES>                                          6,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,544
<CGS>                                            2,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,089
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,739
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets or Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Guy P. Vellake, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 895]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), rendered November 14, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.

After his wife’s body was found floating in Cayuga Lake near Stewart Park in the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County, on July 2, 2000, defendant was charged with two counts of second degree murder. At his August 2, 2000 arraignment, defendant entered a plea of not guilty. The prosecution served an order to show cause prior to the arraignment requesting that defendant be ordered to provide a sample for DNA testing and maintaining that DNA evidence was crucial to the case. County Court granted the prosecution’s request. On August 18, 2000, the prosecution served a statement of readiness for trial and voluntarily disclosed, among other things, copies of serology and certain DNA reports based upon evidence recovered. The prosecution advised that it would make available laboratory reports when the DNA analysis was finally complete. Following a pre*788liminary conference on August 23, 2000, the parties stipulated that discovery would be completed by September 1, 2000 and that the trial would commence on November 6, 2000.

On September 5, 2000, the prosecution advised that the DNA analysis was not yet complete. Such material, however, was provided on September 13, 2000. After being informed the following day that County Court had decided to move the trial date to October 16, 2000, defense counsel made an omnibus motion seeking, among other things, a continuance to have the trial moved back to the original date. This request was denied by County Court. On October 11, 2000, defense counsel moved again for a continuance of the trial for 45 days, citing the need to retain a forensic expert. County Court denied the motion on the date of trial, noting that, if necessary, defense counsel could reapply for a continuance at the close of the prosecution’s case. Before the trial commenced, defendant pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree in satisfaction of all charges and without a promise as to sentencing. He was thereafter sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. He now appeals.

We note that by pleading guilty, defendant is foreclosed from challenging County Court’s denial of his request for a continuance. Such request was premised upon defendant’s desire to retain a forensic expert to potentially controvert the evidence advanced by the prosecution at trial. Insofar as this was essentially an exercise of defendant’s right to confrontation, it is waived by his guilty plea *(see People v Hansen,*95 NY2d 227, 230-231 [2000]; *People v Reiblein,*200 AD2d 281, 283 [1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 831 [1994]; *People v Bishop,*139 AD2d 817, 818 [1988], *lv denied*72 NY2d 856 [1988]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### Abraham Sacks, Respondent, *v.*Louis E. Phillips, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted May 24, 1943;

decided June 10, 1943.

*Arthur*S. *Gales send Joseph S. Robinson*for motion.

*James P. Evers*and *James J. McLaughlin*opposed.

Motion denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I Kevin McCarthy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), in connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the Report) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin McCarthy                   
|                        |  |  |  | Kevin McCarthy                       
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[S. F. Nos. 5457, 5450, 5455, 5456, 5458.

In Bank.

June 25, 1912.]

#### W. S. DOWNING et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM McGRATH et al., CHRISTIANA G. REAY, Appellant. (No. 5457.) JOSEPH SCHODER et al., Respondents, v. WILLIAM McGRATH et al., CHRISTIANA G. REAY, Appellant. (No. 5450.) C. E. GIFFARD, Respondent, v. WILLIAM McGRATH et. al., CHRISTIANA G. REAY, Appellant. (No. 5455.) HENRIETTA SCHAUBEL, Respondent, v. WILLIAM McGRATH et al., CHRISTIANA G. REAY, Appellant. (No. 5456.) ANDREW L. EDWARDS, Respondent, v. WILLIAM McGRATH et al., CHRISTIANA G. REAY, Appellant. (No. 5458.)

Evidence—Destruction of Records—Abstract of Title.—Judgments and orders refusing new trials reversed on the authority of *Dahler*v. *All Persons, ante,*p. 160.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders refusing a new trial. George H. Buck, Judge presiding.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in *Dahler*v. *All Persons, ante,*p. 160.

Norman H. Hurd, and A. A. Sanderson, for Appellant.

William J. Herrin, William S. Downing, and Oscar C. Mueller, for Respondents.

Crittenden Thornton, *Amicus Curiae,*on petition for a rehearing in Bank in No. 5458.

*814THE COURT.

These eases, one and all,, present the same proposition decided in *Dahler*v. *All Persons*(S. F. No. 5622), *ante,*p. 160, [124 Pac. 995].

The so-called abstract of title and certificate thereto of date February 24, 1908, were improperly admitted for the reasons given in the Dahler case. Wherefore, in each of the above entitled cases the judgment and order refusing a new trial are reversed and the cause remanded.

Rehearing denied.
Attachment of Public Interset for Swift Air petition for walk around exemption 4416

Public Interest

End

- products are a higher degree of proficiency in flight crews and a greater level of safety overall, because it allows students to be trained in abnormal situations. The actual airplane, before flight, most likely will not have anything out of the ordinary. In a pictorial, students can see what the airplane would look like if something were wrong. Therefore, better protecting the public as a 121 carrier.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6395 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 602
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6395

                          [Report No. 118-710]

    To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to require the Secretary of the 
   Interior to include the Secretary of Health and Human Services in 
 consultations regarding designations of critical minerals, elements, 
                       substances, and materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2023

Mr. Curtis (for himself and Ms. DeGette) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                            October 22, 2024

           Additional sponsors: Mr. Fitzpatrick and Mr. Crow

                            October 22, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to require the Secretary of the 
   Interior to include the Secretary of Health and Human Services in 
 consultations regarding designations of critical minerals, elements, 
                       substances, and materials.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recognizing the Importance of 
Critical Minerals in Healthcare Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED CONSULTATION WITH THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN 
              SERVICES.

    Paragraphs (4)(C) and (5)(A) of section 7002(c) of the Energy Act 
of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606(c)(4)(C) and (5)(A)) are each amended by 
inserting ``Health and Human Services,'' after ``Agriculture,''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 602

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6395

                          [Report No. 118-710]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend the Energy Act of 2020 to require the Secretary of the 
   Interior to include the Secretary of Health and Human Services in 
 consultations regarding designations of critical minerals, elements, 
                       substances, and materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 22, 2024

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Federal Register: February 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 21)]
[Notices]               
[Page 5287]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02fe10-31]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

 
Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 18 February 2010, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by e-mailing staffcfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: January 22, 2010, in Washington DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary, AIA.
[FR Doc. 2010-1899 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```