alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              OF GASCO ENERGY, INC.
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Gasco Energy, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Mark A. Erickson,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to
my knowledge, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                    /s/ Mark A. Erickson
                                    Name:  Mark A. Erickson
                                    Date:  March 25, 2004




                                       1
<PAGE>





                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF GASCO ENERGY, INC.
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Gasco Energy, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, W. King Grant, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                    /s/ W. King Grant
                                    Name:  W. King Grant
                                    Date:  March 25, 2004






                                       2
<PAGE>
#### LeGAULT *v.*KLEBBA.

Tbial — -Evidence—Pleadings.

Trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to allow pleading filed by defense counsel “on information and belief” to be introduced into evidence by plaintiff.

References foe Points in Headnote

29 Am Jur 2d, Evidence §§ 687, 691.

Appeal from Huron; Bach (Arthur D.), J.

Submitted Division 2 June 4, 1968, at Lansing.

(Docket No. 4,007.)

Decided June 24, 1968.

Complaint by Raymond LeGault against Frank Klebba, doing business as Half-Way Tavern, for damages under the Michigan dramshop act for the death of plaintiffs son. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Patterson & Patterson,*for plaintiff.

*Ohrent, Baun & Vulpe,*for defendant.

*700Per Curiam.

In an action brought under the Michigan dramshop act, CLS 1961, § 436.22 *et seq.*(Stat Ann 1957 Bev and Stat Ann 1968 Cum Supp § 18.993 *et seq.),*a judgment of no cause of action was granted in favor of the defendant Frank Kleb-ba, doing business as Half-Way Tavern.

This appeal is taken from the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the court erred in refusing to allow a pleading filed by defense counsel “on information and belief” to be admitted in evidence at the trial.

Upon a review of the pleadings and the record herein, we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge in denying admission of the pleading as evidence and in denying the motion for new trial.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Lesinski, C. J., and Burns and Fenlon, JJ., concurred.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

No. 11–0389

Filed April 20, 2012

WILLIE HALL,

Appellant,

vs.

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL BOARD,

Appellee.

On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. 

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Eliza J. 

Ovrom, Judge.

On further review, appellant alleges the district court erred in 

assessing court costs. DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART; DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.

Benjamin G. Humphrey, Des Moines, for appellant.

Richard R. Autry, Des Moines, for appellee.
2

APPEL, Justice.

The Employment Appeal Board (Board) denied Willie Hall’s 

application for unemployment insurance benefits. Hall filed a petition for 

judicial review. The district court affirmed the decision of the Board and 

assessed costs against Hall. The court of appeals affirmed. We grant 

further review, but limit our consideration to the question of the validity 

of the judgment as it relates to court costs. See Hills Bank & Trust Co. v. 

Converse, 772 N.W.2d 764, 770 (Iowa 2009) (stating we have the 

discretion to limit our review to any issue raised on appeal). The court of 

appeals decision is the final decision with respect to the other issues 

raised on appeal. See State v. Johnson, 784 N.W.2d 192, 193 n.1 (Iowa 

2010). 

Iowa Code section 96.15(2) (2011) provides, “An individual claiming 

benefits shall not be charged fees of any kind in any proceeding under 

this chapter . . . by a court or an officer of the court.” “Fees” include 

court costs. Cobb v. Emp’t Appeal Bd., 506 N.W.2d 445, 448 (Iowa 

1993); Geiken v. Lutheran Home for the Aged Ass’n, 468 N.W.2d 223, 227 

(Iowa 1991). We accordingly reverse the district court judgment by 

removing the requirement that Hall pay court costs.

DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED IN PART 

AND VACATED IN PART; DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT AFFIRMED 

IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6443

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ALEJANDRO REYES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00195

- MHL

- RCY

- 3; 3:16

- cv 00379

- JRS )

Submitted : November 14, 2018 Decided: November 21, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Alejandro Reyes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alejandro Re yes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on t h e 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion he filed after obtaining authorization from us to file his successive motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certif icate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitution al right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reyes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99




           REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To Catalina Marketing Corporation:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Catalina Marketing Corporation (a Delaware corporation) as of June 30, 1997,
and the related condensed consolidated statement of income for the three-month
period then ended, and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for
the three-month period then ended.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the
year then ended (not presented separately herein), and in our report dated
April 18, 1997, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 1997, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which
it has been derived.





Tampa, Florida,
    July 16, 1997
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 99.2  Limited Financial Information


July 21, 1997              For further information contact:

                           David M. Bradley
                           Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                           North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                           825 Central Avenue
                           Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                           515-576-7531

NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES EARNINGS
(Nasdaq: FFFD)

Fort Dodge, Iowa -- North Central Bancshares, Inc., (the "Company") the holding
company for First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge (the "Bank"), announced
today that the Company earned $959,000, or $0.30 per share for the second
quarter of 1997, compared to $1.0 million, or $0.26 per share during the second
quarter of 1996. For the six months ended June 30, 1997, the net earnings were
$1.8 million or $0.57 per share, as compared to $1.7 million or $0.43 per share
for the corresponding period a year ago.

On March 20, 1996, First Federal Savings Bank completed a reorganization from a
mutual holding company form of organization to a stock holding company form of
organization. Pursuant to this transaction, the Bank became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of North Central Bancshares, Inc. and the Company replaced the Bank
as the issuer listed by The Nasdaq Stock Market. In addition to the exchange of
the Bank's common stock for 1,385,590 shares of the Company's stock, the Company
sold 2,625,467 shares of stock in a subscription offering. This stock offering
resulted in net proceeds for the Company of $25.4 million.

Total assets at June 30, 1997 were $212.9 million as compared to $203.1 million
at December 31, 1996. The increase in total assets resulted primarily from
increases in cash, securities available for sale and loans, partially offset by
decreases in securities held to maturity. Deposits increased $6.5 million, or
5.0% from $129.7 million at December 31, 1996 to $136.3 million at June 30,
1997. Other borrowed funds increased $4.2 million or 18.9% from $22.3 million at
December 31, 1996 to $26.6 million at June 30, 1997.

Nonperforming assets were 0.12% of total assets as of June 30, 1997 compared to
0.15% of total assets as of December 31, 1996. The allowance for loan losses was
$2.1 million or 1.18% of total loans at June 30, 1997, compared to $2.0 million
or 1.14% of total loans at December 31, 1996.

The net interest margin for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 was 4.07% compared
to 4.57% for the corresponding quarter in 1996, primarily due to the cost
associated with the purchase of treasury stock, as compared to no such costs for
the second quarter of 1996. Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30,

                                  ...MORE...
Exhibit 99.2      Press Release




PRESS RELEASE
September 27, 2002

                                 For further information contact:
                                 David M. Bradley
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                 North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                 825 Central Avenue  PO Box 1237
                                 Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                 515-576-7531



                    NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES
                            STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

Fort Dodge, Iowa, September 27, 2002 - North Central Bancshares, Inc. (Nasdaq:
"FFFD") (the "Company"), the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank of
Iowa, announced that it will commence a new stock repurchase program beginning
three days after the Company's press release announcing earnings for the third
quarter ending September 30, 2002. The program authorizes the Company to
repurchase up to 6.02 % or 100,000 shares of its 1,659,880 outstanding shares of
common stock during the next twelve months. The repurchases will be made from
time to time, in open market transactions, at the discretion of management.

North Central Bancshares also announced that it has completed its most recent
stock repurchase program. The Company said it repurchased 100,000 shares of its
outstanding common stock, par value $.01 per share, at the aggregate cost of
$2.7 million in open market transactions. This repurchase program began on
February 21, 2002.

North Central Bancshares, Inc., with over $404 million in assets, as of June 30,
2002, is the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, a federally
chartered stock savings bank. First Federal is a community-oriented institution
serving Iowa through 9 full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames,
Perry, Ankeny, Burlington and Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. First Federal's deposits are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
P. 1



# OAR Box 1867 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 33 ) ll-B-8 7 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:20AM

Sheet 33 of 95P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-8 7 

## PENDING CONFIDENTIAL 

# W



# m Th e following informatio n i s locafce^bisiMReDb^£i£3;derrtia l file s o f th e Director , Emissio n StandartnTTDivision , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , January1991 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Methy l Isobuty l Carbinol . 2 3 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-87 .
Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 14, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00866-CV 

IN RE COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF ARLINGTON SUBSIDIARY, L.P. D/B/A 

MEDICAL CENTER ARLINGTON, Relator 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06294-C 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

The Court has before it relator’s motion to dismiss this original proceeding. Relator 

states that the parties have reached an agreement regarding the discovery dispute that is the 

subject of the petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss this original 

mandamus proceeding. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

150866F.P05 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
7964 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 29 / Friday, February 11, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

In consideration of the foregoing, 

NHTSA amends 49 CFR part 571 as 

follows: 

PART 571—FEDERAL MOTOR 

VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 571 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 

30117, and 30166; delegation of authority at 

49 CFR 1.95. 

■ 2. In § 571.304, revise S7.4(g) to read 

as follows: 

§ 571.304 Standard No. 304; Compressed 

natural gas fuel container integrity. 

* * * * * 

S7.4 * * * 

(g) The statement: ‘‘This container 

should be visually inspected for damage 

and deterioration after a motor vehicle 

accident or fire, and either (a) at least 

every 12 months when installed on a 

vehicle with a GVWR greater than 4,536 

kg, or (b) at least every 36 months or 

36,000 miles, whichever comes first, 

when installed on a vehicle with a 

GVWR less than or equal to 4,536 kg.’’ 

* * * * * 

Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 

1.95 and 501.4. 

Steven S. Cliff, 

Deputy Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02588 Filed 2–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

49 CFR Part 571 

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 

Standards 

CFR Correction 

This rule is being published by the 

Office of the Federal Register to correct 

an editorial or technical error that 

appeared in the most recent annual 

revision of the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

■ In Title 49 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 400 to 571, revised as 

of October 1, 2021, in § 571.108, remove 

S5.1 and S5.2. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03043 Filed 2–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 0099–10–D 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 300 

International Fisheries Regulations 

CFR Correction 

This rule is being published by the 

Office of the Federal Register to correct 

an editorial or technical error that 

appeared in the most recent annual 

revision of the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

■ In Title 50 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 228 to 599, revised as 

of October 1, 2021, in § 300.21, the 

definition of ‘‘Vessel monitoring system 

(VMS)’’ is reinstated to read as follows: 

§ 300.21 Definitions. 

* * * * * 

Vessel monitoring system (VMS) 

means an automated, remote system that 

provides information about a vessel’s 

identity, location and activity, for the 

purposes of routine monitoring, control, 

surveillance and enforcement of area 

and time restrictions and other fishery 

management measures. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2022–03042 Filed 2–10–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 0099–10–D 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 10289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03972]



[[Page 10287]]

Vol. 87

Wednesday,

No. 36

February 23, 2022

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of February 18, 2022--Continuation of the National Emergency 
Concerning the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 36 / Wednesday, February 23, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 10289]]

                Notice of February 18, 2022

                
Continuation of the National Emergency Concerning 
                the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

                On March 13, 2020, by Proclamation 9994, the President 
                declared a national emergency concerning the 
                coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The 
                COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause significant risk 
                to the public health and safety of the Nation. For this 
                reason, the national emergency declared on March 13, 
                2020, and beginning March 1, 2020, must continue in 
                effect beyond March 1, 2022. Therefore, in accordance 
                with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency 
                declared in Proclamation 9994 concerning the COVID-19 
                pandemic.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 18, 2022.

[FR Doc. 2022-03972
Filed 2-22-22; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3395-F2-P
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Micromem TechnologiesInc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, AntonioLopes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

        (1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

        (2) The information contained inthis Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 19, 2004

|   | /s/    Antonio Lopes |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Antonio Lopes        |