alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed December 11, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00179-CR

____________

MATTHEW JOSEPH OLIVEIRA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 7

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1934280

ORDER

Appellant is not represented by counsel. The trial court has previously 

determined that appellant is not entitled to appointment of counsel on appeal. No 

reporter’s record or brief has been filed. Rule 38.8 provides that we will not 

dismiss or consider the appeal without briefs unless it is shown the appellant no 

longer desires to prosecute his appeal or that he is not indigent and has failed to 

make necessary arrangements for filing a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. The rule was 

designed to protect an indigent appellant from the failure of his appointed counsel 
to provide a brief. The rule further provides that under appropriate circumstances, 

“the appellate court may consider the appeal without briefs, as justice may 

require.” Tex. R. App. P. 38.8 (b)(4).

The trial court has already held two hearings at the direction of this court. 

Despite having received notice from the court coordinator, appellant failed to 

appear at the most recent hearing scheduled December 1, 2014. Because the trial 

court has already held one hearing to make the findings required under Rule 38.8, 

and we can find nothing in the rules or case law that requires this court to once 

again send this matter back to the trial court, we decline to do so. 

Therefore, we ORDER appellant to file a brief in this appeal on or before 

January 12, 2015. If appellant fails to file his brief as ordered, we will decide this 

appeal upon the record before the Court. See Lott v. State, 874 S.W.2d 687, 688

(Tex. Crim. App. 1994) (affirming conviction on record alone where appellant 

failed to file a pro se brief after being properly admonished); Coleman v. State, 774 

S.W.2d 736, 738–39 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no pet.) (holding that 

former rule 74(l)(2) (now Rule 38.8(b)) permitted an appeal to be considered 

without briefs “as justice may require” when a pro se appellant has not complied 

with the rules of appellate procedure).

PER CURIAM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6649 

To facilitate non-motorized border crossings across the Gordie Howe 

International Bridge, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. THANEDAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To facilitate non-motorized border crossings across the 

Gordie Howe International Bridge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bike the Border Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FACILITATION OF NON-MOTORIZED BORDER 

6 CROSSINGS ACROSS THE GORDIE HOWE 

7 INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of U.S. Cus9 toms and Border Protection shall take such actions as 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6649 IH

1 may be necessary to effectively and vigorously facilitate, 

2 including through expedition, of non-motorized, including 

3 bicycle and pedestrian, border crossings across the Gordie 

4 Howe International Bridge. 

5 (b) GAO REPORT.—Not later than two years after 

6 the date of the first day of public operation of the Gordie 

7 Howe International Bridge, the Comptroller General of 

8 the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

9 Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and 

10 the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

11 Affairs of the Senate a report that— 

12 (1) reviews the progress of the U.S. Customs 

13 and Border Protection’s handling of non-motorized, 

14 including bicycle and pedestrian, traffic across the 

15 Bridge; and 

16 (2) includes— 

17 (A) a determination regarding whether 

18 U.S. Custom and Border Protection has facili19 tated, including through expedition, such non20 motorized border crossings across the Bridge; 

21 (B) recommendations regarding how U.S. 

22 Custom and Border Protection may further 

23 such facilitation; and 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6649 IH

1 (C) recommendations regarding what, if 

2 any, incentives could be utilized to encourage 

3 such non-motorized traffic. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.6
















CONSENT OF MATHIEU SAVARD







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Mathieu Savard, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, 2011 Exploration Program, Coulon Project, Quebec Mines Virginia Inc.”, completed in November 2011; and




-

“Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2011 Exploration Program – Wabamisk Project” completed in May 2012; 




concerning mineralized material in the Coulon and Wabamisk properties for the Company (collectively the “Reports”). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Coulon property, under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.1.4 Geological Setting; 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.1.6 Mineralization” and for the Wabamisk property, under headings “3.4.4 Geological Setting, 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling, and 3.4.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,










	
	/s/  Mathieu Savard


	Name:  Mathieu Savard, B.Sc., P.Geo.



















May 14, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          45,795
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    606,456
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,583
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,622
<LOANS>                                      1,864,057
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,615,466
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,713,881
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            638,598
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                     262,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,615,466
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 71,663
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,622
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                94,285
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              40,662
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,379
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           36,244
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,499
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,291
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.45
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,920
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                14,798
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                27,721
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,999
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,221
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            27,221
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               11,652,505
<SECURITIES>                            540,234
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,198,199
<ALLOWANCES>                             43,906
<INVENTORY>                              18,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     13,740,981
<PP&E>                                  992,272
<DEPRECIATION>                         (197,053)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       20,210,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,230,620
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 22,205
<OTHER-SE>                           15,957,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         20,210,785
<SALES>                              27,220,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     27,220,240
<CGS>                                17,031,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         5,629,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (5,464,629)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       22,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      10,002,287
<INCOME-TAX>                          3,784,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   6,218,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          6,218,177
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.24



</TABLE>
[S. F. No. 6278.

In Bank.

July 17, 1912.]

#### ROBERT VINCENT et al., Petitioners, v. FRANK H. MOTT et al., Mayor and Commissioners and City Council and Ex-Officio Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Oakland, etc., Respondents.

Election—Charter of City of Oakland—Recall Election—Officers of Election Boards.—Under the provisions of the charter of the city of Oakland, section 1142 of the Political Code, determining the qualifications and method of appointment of the officers of election boards, applies to recall elections held under such charter.

Id.—Apportionment of Officers Between Different Political Parties—Mandamus to Compel.—A writ of mandate will not lie to compel the city council of such city to apportion the officers of the election boards at a recall election among persons belonging to different political parties, as required by that section, in the absence of an averment that the council threatens to disobey the section in that particular.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the city council of the City of Oakland and ex-officio Board of Election Commissioners, to appoint as officers of the election boards at a recall election persons of whom half belong to *343the Republican party and half to the Democratic party, as required by section 1142 of the Political Code. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

R. M. Royce, for Petitioners.

THE COURT.

It does not appear from the petition presented that the Oakland council has been asked to appoint on the election boards to hold the recall election persons of whom half belong to the Republican party and half to the Democratic party, as required in section 1142 of the Political Code. We think that under the provisions of the charter that section applies to recall elections held under said charter. But because of the failure to aver that the council threatens to disobey that section, the application for *mandamus*is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7542

TERRY LEE ROSEBORO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (5:04-cv-0389)

Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 28, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Roseboro, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and

find no reversible error. See Roseboro v. United States, No. 5:04-

cv-0389 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 31, 2005; Sept. 15, 2005). Accordingly,

we grant Roseboro’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and affirm on the ground that Roseboro’s petition is properly

characterized as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,452
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  253
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27
<INVENTORY>                                     12
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,782
<PP&E>                                         574
<DEPRECIATION>                                 150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          993
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         5
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,146
<SALES>                                      1,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,819
<CGS>                                        1,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .41
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







Perficient,
Inc.


Austin,
Texas




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-100490, No. 333-116549, No. 333-117216, No. 333-123177, No.
333-129054, No. 333-138602, No. 333-142267, No. 333-145899, No. 333-147687, No.
333-148978 and No. 333-152274) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-42626, No. 333-44854, No. 333-75666, No. 333-118839, No.
333-130624and No.
333-147730) of Perficient, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, except Note 2
relating to the 2006 consolidated financial statements, as to which date is
August 13, 2007, which appears in this Form 10-K.





Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the Company’s
adoption, effective January 1, 2006, of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment.











/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP


Houston,
Texas


March 5,
2009
Exhibit-32.1


                        Certification Pursuant to
                          18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                          as Adopted Pursuant to
             Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Amended Report of eClic, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Evagelina Esparza Barrza, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of eClic, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: June 15, 2004
      -------------
                                           /s/ Evagelina Esparza Barrza
                                           ----------------------------
                                               Evagelina Esparza Barrza
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the periodic report of Connetics Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Thomas G. Wiggans, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

Date: May 14, 2003

/s/ Thomas G. Wiggans
-------------------------------------
Thomas G. Wiggans
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors
Nextel Partners, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-10998 and 333-106352) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-34724, 333-99017, and
333-117015) on Form S-8 of Nextel Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports
dated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Nextel
Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity
and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K
of Nextel Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries.

As discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company
has restated its consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2003.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 16, 2005
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6591 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 29, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To amend section 8(a) of the Small Business Act to require 

the Administrator of the Small Business Administration 

to regularly reassess the asset and net worth thresholds 

for qualifying as an economically disadvantaged individual, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6591 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Encouraging Success 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REGULAR REASSESSMENT OF THE THRESHOLDS 

5 FOR ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED INDI6 VIDUALS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8(a)(6) of the Small Busi8 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)(6)) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following new subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(F)(i) Not later than 1 year after the date of the 

11 enactment of this subparagraph, and not less frequently 

12 than every 4 years thereafter, the Administrator shall as13 sess and, if appropriate, revise the maximum value of 

14 asset and the maximum net worth an individual may have 

15 to qualify as an economically disadvantaged individual 

16 under subparagraph (A) to account for changes in the 

17 economy, including inflation and other factors as deter18 mined appropriate by the Administrator. 

19 ‘‘(ii) The Administrator shall make each 

20 covered revision by issuing a rule after an op21 portunity for public notice and comment. 

22 ‘‘(iii) To the extent practicable, the Admin23 istrator shall coordinate the activities carried 

24 out under clause (i) with the activities required 

25 under section 1344(a)(2) of the Small Business 

26 Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 632 note). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6591 RFS

1 ‘‘(iv) In this subparagraph, the term ‘cov2 ered revision’ means a revision described in 

3 clause (i) that the Administrator determines is 

4 appropriate pursuant to an assessment under 

5 such clause.’’. 

6 (b) COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.—No additional 

7 amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry out 

8 this Act or the amendments made by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 28, 

2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS