52190 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection 

Program 

Within 30 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection 

program, as applicable, to incorporate the 

information specified in Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 9, dated February 2013, of the 

Dassault Falcon 2000EX Maintenance 

Manual. The initial compliance time for 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness Limitations, 

DGT 113877, Revision 9, dated February 

2013, of the Dassault Falcon 2000EX 

Maintenance Manual, is within the times 

specified in that maintenance manual, or 30 

days after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs later, except as provided 

by paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(4) of this AD. 

(1) The term ‘‘landings’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total airplane 

landings. 

(2) The term ‘‘flight hours’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total flight hours. 

(3) The term ‘‘flight cycles’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total flight cycles. 

(4) For task number 52–20–00–610–801–01 

52–205 the initial compliance time is within 

24 months after the effective date of this AD. 

(h) Terminating Action for the Affected AD 

Accomplishing the actions specified in 

paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2010– 

26–05, Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010), for Dassault Aviation 

Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes. 

(i) No Alternative Actions and Intervals 

After accomplishment of the revision 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no 

alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or 

intervals may be used unless the actions or 

intervals are approved as an alternative 

method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113877, 

Revision 8, dated July 2012, of the Dassault 

Falcon 2000EX Maintenance Manual. 

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM–116– 

AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA); or Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(l) Related Information 

Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European 

Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness 

Directive 2012–0157, dated August 23, 2012, 

for related information. This MCAI may be 

found in the AD docket on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov/

#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0794-0002. 

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Chapter 5–40, Airworthiness 

Limitations, DGT 113877, Revision 9, dated 

February 2013, of the Dassault Falcon 

2000EX Maintenance Manual. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http://

www.dassaultfalcon.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

1, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19020 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0978; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–120–AD; Amendment 

39–17958; AD 2014–17–05] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767–400ER 

series airplanes. This AD was prompted 

by reports of turbine wheel bursts in the 

air driven pump (ADP) turbine gearbox 

assembly (TGA), which resulted in the 

release of high energy fragments. This 

AD requires replacing the existing ADP 

TGA with an improved ADP TGA. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent fragments 

from an uncontained turbine wheel 

burst penetrating the fuselage and 

striking passengers, or penetrating the 

wing-to-body fairing and striking 

ground handling or maintenance 

personnel, causing serious injury. 

DATES: This AD is effective October 8, 

2014. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of October 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, 

MC2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 

review this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 52191 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0978; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kenneth Frey, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM– 

130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6468; 

fax: 425–917–6190; email: 

kenneth.frey@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain The Boeing Company 

Model 767–400ER series airplanes. The 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on December 6, 2013 (78 FR 

73460). The NPRM was prompted by 

reports of turbine wheel bursts in the 

ADP TGA, which resulted in the release 

of high energy fragments. The NPRM 

proposed to require replacing the 

existing ADP TGA with an improved 

ADP TGA. We are issuing this AD to 

prevent fragments from an uncontained 

turbine wheel burst penetrating the 

fuselage and striking passengers, or 

penetrating the wing-to-body fairing and 

striking ground handling or 

maintenance personnel, causing serious 

injury. 

Revised Service Information 

In Note 1 to paragraph (g) of the 

NPRM (78 FR 73460, December 6, 2013), 

we referred to Fairchild Controls 

Service Bulletin N012000000–29–03, 

Revision 2, dated January 29, 2013, as 

a source of guidance information for 

modifying an existing ADP TGA. Since 

the NPRM was published, Fairchild 

Controls has published Fairchild 

Controls Service Bulletin N012000000– 

29–03, Revision 3, dated March 7, 2014. 

We have revised Note 1 to paragraph (g) 

of this final rule to refer to Fairchild 

Controls Service Bulletin N012000000– 

29–03, Revision 3, dated March 7, 2014. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comment 

received on the proposal (78 FR 73460, 

December 6, 2013) and the FAA’s 

response to the comment. 

Request to Clarify Compliance Time 

Boeing commented that the 

compliance time in paragraph (i) of the 

proposed NPRM (78 FR 73460, 

December 6, 2013) was confusing and 

requested clarification. Boeing stated 

that the compliance time in Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 767– 

29–0113, dated May 29, 2013, is 36 

months after the release date of that 

service bulletin, which was May 29, 

2013. Boeing asked if the NPRM’s 

compliance time was also 36 months 

after that service bulletin’s release date, 

or if it was 36 months after the effective 

date of the final rule. Boeing suggested 

that paragraph (i) of the proposed NPRM 

be revised to state ‘‘36 months after the 

effective date of the AD.’’ 

We agree to clarify the compliance 

time. Paragraph (i) of this AD explains 

that where Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated 

May 29, 2013, specifies a compliance 

time ‘‘after the original issue date of this 

service bulletin,’’ this AD requires 

compliance within the specified 

compliance time ‘‘after the effective date 

of this AD. Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated 

May 29, 2013, specifies a compliance 

time of ‘‘within 36 months after the 

original issue date of this service 

bulletin.’’ Therefore, the compliance 

time for accomplishing the replacement 

required by this AD is within 36 months 

after the effective date of this AD. No 

change was made to this final rule 

regarding this issue. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comment received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

73460, December 6, 2013) for correcting 

the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 73460, 

December 6, 2013). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 37 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators. 

Replacement ........................................................................... 7 work-hours × $85 per hour 

= $595.

$114,705 $115,300 $4,266,100 

Authority for this Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
52192 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 170 / Wednesday, September 3, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2014–17–05 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–17958; Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0978; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–120–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective October 8, 2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 767–400ER series airplanes, 

certificated in any category, as identified in 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

767–29–0113, dated May 29, 2013. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 29, Hydraulic Power. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

turbine wheel bursts in the air driven pump 

(ADP) turbine gearbox assembly (TGA), 

which resulted in the release of high energy 

fragments. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

fragments from an uncontained turbine 

wheel burst penetrating the fuselage and 

striking passengers, or penetrating the wingto-body fairing and striking ground handling 

or maintenance personnel, causing serious 

injury. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Replacement of Turbine Gearbox 

Assembly 

Except as required by paragraph (i) of this 

AD: At the time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated May 29, 

2013, replace the existing ADP TGA having 

part number N012000000 or N012000000–1 

with an improved ADP TGA having part 

number N012000000–2 or N012000000–3, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated May 29, 

2013. 

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: 

Guidance on modifying an existing ADP TGA 

so it can be re-identified as part number 

N012000000–2 or N012000000–3 can be 

found in Fairchild Controls Service Bulletin 

N012000000–29–03, Revision 3, dated March 

7, 2014. 

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition 

As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install an ADP TGA having part 

number N012000000 or N012000000–1 on 

any airplane. 

(i) Exception to Service Information 

Specifications 

Where Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated May 29, 2013, 

specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the 

original issue date of this service bulletin,’’ 

this AD requires compliance within the 

specified compliance time ‘‘after the effective 

date of this AD.’’ 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be 

emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane. 

(k) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Kenneth Frey, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 

3356; phone: 425–917–6468; fax: 425–917– 

6190; email: kenneth.frey@faa.gov. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–29–0113, dated May 29, 2013. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington on August 

15, 2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–20213 Filed 9–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0994; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASW–29] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Albuquerque, NM 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class 

E airspace at the Albuquerque VHF 

Omni-Directional Radio Range Tactical 

Air Navigation Aid (VORTAC), 

Albuquerque, NM, to facilitate vectoring 

of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft 

under control of Albuquerque Air Route 

Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). This 

improves the safety and management of 

IFR operations within the National 

Airspace System. 

DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, 

November 13, 2014. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES