alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.7







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Properties Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
B. Clark, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









By:  /s/Richard B.
      Clark




Richard
      B. Clark


Chief
      Executive Officer




March 12,
2010
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**









In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Security Resources Corporation
      , a
      Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December
      31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      Randall Newton, Chief Financial Officer, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Randall Newton




Randall
      Newton


Chief
      Financial Officer







October
      31, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Security Resources Corporation and will be retained by the Company
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Alvin CHESONIS, Appellant, v. John GARDNER, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America.

Nos. 15875, 15876.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 1, 1966.

Decided Dec. 12, 1966.

W. J. Krencewicz, Shenandoah, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph R. Ritchie, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GANEY, SMITH and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This matter involves the disposition of motions for summary judgment by both the plaintiff and defendant and an appeal by the plaintiff from the granting of defendant’s motion and the denial of the plaintiff’s motion.

The plaintiff filed an application for a period of disability and for disability insurance benefits on April 18, 1962, alleging he became unable to work on November 10, 1959. The application was denied initially and later reconsidered by the Division of Disability Operations of the Social Security Administration, after the Pennsylvania Board of Vocational Rehabilitation had found the plaintiff was not under a disability upon an evaluation of the evidence by a physician and a disability examiner. The hearing examiner, considering the case *de novo,*found, on April 11, 1963, that the plaintiff was not under a disability beginning on or before June 30, 1962, when he last had the necessary disability status. After denial of his request for review of the hearing examiner’s decision by the Appeals Council, plaintiff brought an action in the District Court requesting judicial review of the decision. On its own motion, by order of January 8, 1964, the matter was remanded to the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare for the taking of additional testimony stating that reconsideration should be given to his employment capabilities and establishment of whether such disability as he had prevented him from engaging in any substantial gainful activity. Additionally, evidence was taken by the hearing examiner, including that of a vocational consultant, and the examiner found that the plaintiff was not under a disability and, upon consideration of the whole record, the Appeals Council, as of December 30, 1964, rendered a decision which approved and adopted the hearing examiner’s recommended decision of October 9, 1964. Accordingly, the Appeals Council’s decision was the final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

*1013On July 11, 1963, the plaintiff filed a complaint and cross-motions for summary judgment were filed and argued before Honorable Harold K. Wood who, in a well-considered opinion, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6460 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from issuing, finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any rule or guidance to facilitate abortions or access to abortions for an unaccompanied alien child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. BRECHEEN (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. 

GOOD of Virginia, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. DUNCAN, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, 

Mrs. HINSON, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. WEBER of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from issuing, finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any 

rule or guidance to facilitate abortions or access to abortions for an unaccompanied alien child. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Taxpayer Abortions 

5 for Unaccompanied Minors Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6460 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RULES TO FACILITATE ABOR2 TIONS OR ACCESS TO ABORTIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi4 sion of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

5 may not issue, finalize, implement, or enforce any rule or 

6 guidance to facilitate abortions or access to abortions (in7 cluding expenses for travel or lodging for the purpose of 

8 obtaining an abortion) for an unaccompanied alien child. 

9 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘unac10 companied alien child’’ has the meaning given such term 

11 in section 462(g)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

12 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04099]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 39 / Monday, February 28, 2022 / 
Notices

[[Page 11038]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Submission for OMB Review; Notice of Request for Emergency 
Approval

February 22, 2022.
    In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (PRA), the Department of Agriculture (USDA) has submitted a 
request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for a six-month 
emergency approval of the following information collection: ICR 0596-
NEW, Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission Nomination. The 
requested approval would enable the implementation of this Commission 
to collect the necessary information needed to brief to Congress on 
future wild fire mitigation and management plans and techniques.

Forest Service

    Title: Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission 
Nomination.
    OMB Control Number: 0596-NEW.
    Summary of Collection: The Forest Service (FS) is requesting 
emergency clearance and review through 5 CFR 1320.13 for a new 
information collection for the Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management 
Commission Nomination. The United States Department of Agriculture 
(USDA), United States Department of Interior (DOI) and Federal 
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) collaboratively established the 
Wildland Fire Mitigation and Management Commission in December 2021 as 
part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Levi S. Harrell,
Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-04099 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
Abatement Order filed June 2 , 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00130

- CV

____________ IN RE TREY MELCHER A ND YVONNE MELCHER, E T AL , Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 52524



### ABATEMENT ORDER
On February 19, 2006, relators 1 filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this

court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West. 2004). In the petition, relators requested that this court compel the Honorable Elaine Palmer, Judge of the 215 th

1 Relators are Trey Melcher and Yvonne Evie Melcher, Trustees of the Evie Melcher Non

Exempt Trust; Melcher Investments; Bill E. Lewis and Richard L. Kerr, Jr., Co

- Trustees of the Lucille Birmingham Melcher Management Trust and the Leroy Melcher Marital Deduction Trust, and former Co

- Trustees of the Evie Melcher Non

- Exempt Trus t, and as for Co

- Executors of the Estate of Lucille Birmingham Melcher (collectively, the “Melchers”).District Court, Harris County, Texas, to set aside her August 28, 2015 order granting the supplemental motion for sanctions filed by Harris County in trial court cause
number 2011

- 52524, styled Harris County, et al. v. S.K. Brothers, Inc., et al.
On May 31, 2016, relators filed an agreed motion to abate this original proceeding for at least sixty days to allow the parties to explore settlement options. The agreed motion to abate is GRANTED

. Accordingly, we issue the following
order:
The original proceed ing is abated for a period of sixty days from the date of this order, at which time relators and real parties in interest are directed to advise the court of the status of the case. The original proceeding is treated as a closed case,
and removed from thi s court’s active docket. The original proceeding will be
reinstated on this court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original proceeding or other dispositive motion. This court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinst ate the original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.17
















CONSENT OF JEAN-FRANÇOIS OUELLETTE







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Jean-François Ouellette, participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of a technical report entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, 2011 Geological Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec” completed in February 2012 (the “Report”) concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.4.4 Geological Setting ; 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.4.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,










	
	/s/  Jean-François Ouellette


	Name:  Jean-François Ouellette



















May 14, 2012
#### The State, ex rel. Hinkley, v. Humber et al., and Eighteen Other Like Cases.

Intoxicating liquors: failure to make return of sale: penalty: WHO MAY SUB FOR.

*Appeals from Plymouth District Court.*

Thursday, October 27, 1887.

*Zink <£ Gosselin*and *Cole, MeVey <& Clark,*for appellant.

Noappearan.ee for appellees.

Per Ouriam.

The record in all of the foregoing cases is precisely the same as in *The State, ex rel Hinkley, v. Martland et al,*71 Iowa, 545; and, following that case, the judgment in each of the foregoing cases is

Reversed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD F. ADAMS, JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 412 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Isaac A. McGowan (Now Deceased), Respondent, against New York Central Railroad Company, Employer and Self-Insurer, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Argued April 5, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*Robert E. Whalen*and *Charles E. Nichols*for appellant.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Roy Wiedersum*and *Orrin G. Judd*of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.

*890Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lewis, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the claim.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                                       to
                               Certificateholders

                                                                             Ending
Class                  Interest              Principal     Losses           Balance
<S>                   <C>            <C>                   <C>         <C>
A-1                  12,983,359.13      11,774,215.26        0.00      257,225,784.74
A-2                  24,672,019.50               0.00        0.00      476,754,000.00
B                     2,550,383.30               0.00        0.00       48,425,000.00
C                     2,375,273.50               0.00        0.00       43,583,000.00
D                       545,932.70               0.00        0.00        9,685,000.00
E                     1,703,230.46               0.00        0.00       29,056,000.00
F                       993,531.56               0.00        0.00       16,949,000.00
G                       476,986.22               0.00        0.00        9,685,000.00
H                       953,972.50               0.00        0.00       19,370,000.00
J                       357,752.00               0.00        0.00        7,264,000.00
K                       405,426.00               0.00        0.00        8,232,000.00
L                       596,269.74               0.00        0.00       12,107,000.00
M                       238,468.50               0.00        0.00        4,842,000.00
N                       238,517.80               0.00        0.00        4,843,000.00
O                       429,308.40               0.00        0.00        8,716,922.00
R-I                           0.00               0.00        0.00                0.00
R-II                          0.00               0.00        0.00                0.00
R-III                         0.00               0.00        0.00                0.00
X                     7,176,394.73               0.00        0.00                0.00


</TABLE>
#### Solomon Graves, Respondent, *v.*Clarinda H. Spier, Appellant.

(Argued March 27, 1872;

decided April 2, 1872.)

*A. McDonald*for the appellant.

*Francis Ferncm*for the respondent.

Agree to affirm. Fo opinion. Folger, J., not voting.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of MDU Communications International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2009 (the “Report”),
I, Sheldon Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  SHELDON
      NELSONSheldon
      NelsonChief
      Executive Officer and
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerMDU
      Communications International, Inc.December
      29, 2009Totowa,
      New Jersey





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
and will be retained by MDU Communications International, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
----

**Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp**  CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS  LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS  TORONTO • MONTREAL 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents  to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated April 13, 2007 on the  consolidated financial statements of Banyan Corporation (the Company) included  in its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB being filed by the Company, for the fiscal  year ended December 31, 2006.

| Toronto, Ontario      April 16, 2007 | *“Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP”*

Chartered Accountants        Licensed Public Accountants |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

1167 Caledonia Road  Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1  Tel: 416 785 5353  Fax: 416 785 5663

----
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




Perficient,
      Inc.


Austin,
      Texas




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No. 333-100490, No. 333-116549, No. 333-117216, No. 333-123177, No.
      333-129054, No. 333-138602, and No. 333-142267) and Form S-8 (No. 333-42626,
      No.
      333-44854, No. 333-75666, No. 333-118839 and No. 333-130624) of Perficient,
      Inc.
      of our reports dated March 1, 2007, except Note 2 as to which date is August
      13,
      2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness
      of
      Perficient, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, which appear
      in
      the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
      2006, as amended by Amendment No. 2.





/s/
      BDO Seidman, LLP


Houston,
      Texas


August
      13, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,486
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,610
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,698
<PP&E>                                          79,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,639
<SALES>                                        105,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,072
<CGS>                                           89,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    98
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,372
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,445
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Blockbuster Inc. Subsidiaries**

Blockbuster Argentina, S.A.

Blockbuster Canada Co. 

BlockbusterCanada Inc. 

Blockbuster de Mexico, SA de CV 

Blockbuster Digital Inc. 

Blockbuster Distribution, Inc. 

Blockbuster Entertainment Limited 

Blockbuster Entertainment (Ireland) Limited 

Blockbuster Global Services Inc. 

BlockbusterInternational Spain Inc. 

Blockbuster Investments LLC 

Blockbuster Italia, S.p.A. 

Blockbuster NZ Limited 

Blockbuster Procurement LP 

Blockbuster UK Limited

Blockbuster Uruguay Ltda. 

Blockbuster Video Danmark A/S 

Blockbuster Video Espana S.L. 

Blockbuster Video Italy, Inc. 

Cityvision Limited 

Direcorp, S.A. de D.V. 

EntretenT a Domicilo, S. deR.L. 

Movielink, LLC 

Sercorp, S.A.de C.V. 

Trading Zone Inc.