alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                         132,962
<SECURITIES>                                   176,053
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                       436
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,670
<PP&E>                                          12,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 746,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           909
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   746,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,017
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (80,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (80,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.4   Press Release



PRESS RELEASE
June 17, 1999


                              For further information contact:
                              David M. Bradley
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                              825 Central Avenue
                              Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                              515-576-7531


           NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. COMPLETES STOCK REPURCHASE


Fort Dodge, Iowa - North Central Bancshares, Inc. (Nasdaq:  "FFFD") announced
that it has completed a 5.34% stock repurchase program today. The Company said
it repurchased 150,000 shares of its outstanding common stock, par value $.01
per share, at the aggregate cost of $2,736,625, in open market transactions. The
repurchase program began on May 6, 1999. Upon settlement of the last transaction
on or about June 22, 1999, there will be 2,657,242 shares of North Central
Bancshares, Inc. common stock outstanding.

North Central Bancshares, Inc., with over $334 million in assets, is the holding
company for First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, a federally chartered stock
savings bank. First Federal is a community-oriented institution serving Iowa
through 8 full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Perry, Burlington
and Mt. Pleasant, Iowa. First Federal's deposits are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
#### Orival O. Clark, Resp’t, *v.*John Claflin *et al.,*App’lts. Andresen & Blatt Folding Bed Co. *v.*The Same. Philander Derby *et al. v.*The Same.

Motion to dismiss.

The defendants deny in each of these entitled actions that the same questions only arise in them that have been considered and passed upon by this, court in the other cases just determined. The court cannot undertake, in advance of the argument, to examine the records in each to determine for itself whether such statement is borne out or not. The court shall have to do that when the cases come before it regularly, as reached for argument on the calendar. If the same questions only arise that have already been passed upon here, it may, of course, be expected they will meet with the same end.

The motion is denied, but, under the circumstances, without costs.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Trend-Following FuturesFund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill LynchAlternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  This Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained inthis Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2008                  |                 |
|----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                         |                 |
| By                                           | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                             |                 |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |                 |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |                 |
|                                              |                      |  |

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6737 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop a force design for 

the Air Force and the Space Force, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. BACON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Air Force to develop a 

force design for the Air Force and the Space Force, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Force Future 

5 Force Design Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUTURE FORCE DESIGN OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

7 THE AIR FORCE. 

8 (a) FORCE DESIGN REQUIRED.—Not later than Au9 gust 31, 2024, the Secretary of the Air Force shall develop 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6737 IH

1 a force design for the Air Force and Space Force projected 

2 through 2050. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The force design under subsection 

4 (a) shall address— 

5 (1) the concepts, capabilities, and structural 

6 elements (including size and form) of the Air Force 

7 and Space Force that are necessary to ensure those 

8 forces effectively execute their core functions 

9 through 2050 in support of the National Defense 

10 Strategy and the National Military Strategy; 

11 (2) force structure, including the development 

12 of capabilities (including platforms and systems) at 

13 the correct level of capacity to address the challenges 

14 outlined by the National Defense Strategy and the 

15 National Military Strategy; 

16 (3) force composition, including recruitment 

17 and development of human capital, effective distribu18 tion of forces in the total force, and policies to in19 crease career flexibility across the various compo20 nents of the force; 

21 (4) organizational design, including develop22 ment of potential models to increase agility and 

23 operational effectiveness across the Air Force and 

24 Space Force; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6737 IH

1 (5) such other matters as the Secretary of the 

2 Air Force determines to be relevant. 

3 (c) INFORMATION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 60 

4 days after completion of the force design required under 

5 subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force shall— 

6 (1) submit a summary of the force design to 

7 the congressional defense committees; and 

8 (2) provide to the congressional defense com9 mittees a briefing on the force design. 

10 (d) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE11 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 

12 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

13 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 23

- 2447

___________________________ Juan Raymundo

- Velasquez

Petitioner

v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Respondent

____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ Submitted: January 11, 2024 Filed: January 17, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON , K ELLY , and S TRAS , Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Juan Raymundo

- Velasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, this court denies the petition.-2- The BIA denied Raymundo

- Velasquez ’s request for termination of the proceedings under Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), and dismissed his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) based on an adverse credibility determination. Raymundo

- Velasquez ’s challenge to the agency’s jurisdiction over his removal proceedings is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See Ali v. Barr , 924 F.3d 983, 986 (8th Cir. 2019)

. S ee also Tino v. Garland , 13 F.4th 708, 709 n.2 (8th Cir. 2021)

.
Furthermore, substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination. See Yu An Li v. Holder , 745 F.3d 336, 340 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). The immigration judge provided specific, cogent reasons for the credibility determination, including that Raymundo

- Velasquez failed to adequately explain inconsistencies in his statements or provide sufficient corroborating evidence. See Shazi v. Wilkinson , 988 F.3d 441, 450

- 51 (8th Cir. 2021); Kegeh v. Sessions , 865 F.3d 990, 995

- 97 (8th Cir. 2 017); Ezeagwu v. Mukasey , 537 F.3d 836, 839

- 40 (8th Cir. 2008). Because Raymundo

- Velasquez based his asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims on the same discredited testimony, the adverse credibility determination disposed of his claims. See Ali v. Holder , 776 F.3d 522, 528 (8th Cir. 2015).

The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Order entered February 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01180-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 01-09-843

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 17, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant shall file her brief by MONDAY, MARCH 16, 2015. We caution appellant 

that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6566 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to make grants to local educational 

agencies to make physical improvements at the elementary schools and 

secondary schools served by such agencies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Education to make grants 

to local educational agencies to make physical improvements at the elementary schools and secondary schools 

served by such agencies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stronger Schools Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall 

7 make grants, on a competitive basis, to local educational 

8 agencies to perform the physical improvements referred to 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6566 IH

1 in subsection (b) for elementary schools and secondary 

2 schools served by such agencies. 

3 (b) USE OF FUNDS.—Each local educational agency 

4 receiving a grant under subsection (a) shall use such funds 

5 to ensure each elementary school and secondary school 

6 served by such agency— 

7 (1) hires a school resource officer who carries 

8 a firearm; and 

9 (2) establishes a single point of entry that in10 cludes a locked anteroom— 

11 (A) in which all guests of such school are 

12 inspected by such officer prior to entry into an13 other area of such school; and 

14 (B) which has metal detectors and bullet 

15 proof windows at such point of entry. 

16 (c) APPLICATION.—To receive a grant under sub17 section (a), a local educational agency shall submit to the 

18 Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, 

19 and containing such information as the Secretary may re20 quire. 

21 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

22 of the enactment of this section, the Secretary shall sub23 mit to Congress a report on the implementation of sub24 section (a). 

25 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6566 IH

1 (1) ESEA TERMS.—The terms ‘‘elementary 

2 school’’, ‘‘local educational agency’’, ‘‘secondary 

3 school’’, and ‘‘State educational agency’’ have the 

4 meaning given such terms in section 8101 of the El5 ementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

6 U.S.C. 7801). 

7 (2) SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER.—The term 

8 ‘‘school resource officer’’ has the meaning given such 

9 term in section 1709 of the Omnibus Crime Control 

10 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10389). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
15448

#### LYNCH *ET AL.*v. LYNCH *ET AL.*

(21 S. E. (2d), 369)

*145
      *Mr. M.*L. *Meadors*and *Messrs. Wittcox, Hardee, Houck & Wallace,*all of Florence, counsel for appellant,

*146
      *Mr. Henry B. Davis,*of Florence, counsel for respondent,

July 31, 1942.

*Per curiam.*

Upon mature consideration of the record and the issues presented by the appeal, we are satisfied that the Circuit Court reached the correct conclusion. The decree of the lower Court is adopted as the judgment of this Court. Judgment affirmed.

• Mr. Chiee Justice Bonham, "Messrs. Associate Justices Eishburne. and Stukes, and Circuit Judge Gas-ton, Acting Associate Justice, concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6343 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6343

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide a plot allowance for spouses and children 
    of veterans buried in State cemeteries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2023

Mr. Kim of New Jersey (for himself and Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide a plot allowance for spouses and children 
    of veterans buried in State cemeteries, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting our Veterans' Memories 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PLOT ALLOWANCE FOR SPOUSES AND 
              CHILDREN OF VETERANS BURIED IN STATE CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c) through (e) as 
        subsections (d) through (f), repectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection (c):
    ``(c)(1) In the case of an individual described in paragraph (2) 
who is buried in a cemetery that is owned by a State or by an agency or 
political subdivision of a State, the Secretary shall pay to such 
State, agency, or political subdivision the sum of $525 as a plot or 
interment allowance for such individual.
    ``(2) An individual described in this paragraph is a spouse, 
surviving spouse (which for purposes of this subsection includes a 
surviving spouse who had a subsequent remarriage), minor child (which 
for purposes of this subsection includes a child under 21 years of age, 
or under 23 years of age if pursuing a course of instruction at an 
approved educational institution), or, in the discretion of the 
Secretary, unmarried adult child of any of person described in 
paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (7) of section 2402 of this title.''; 
and
            (3) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``subsection (b)'' and inserting ``subsections (b) and (c)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with 
respect to a death occurring on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RONALD P. GILLIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3887 ) DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY ) AMERICAS, as Trustee for Residential ) Accredit Loans, Inc., Mortgage Asset- ) Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series ) 2006-QS8 and SUNTRUST BANK, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed March 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; James R. Thompson, Senior Judge. Mark A. Cullen of The Cullen Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant. Kimberly S. Mello and Vitaliy Kats of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa; and Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. No appearance for Appellee SunTrust Bank.- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# UnitedStates C ou rt o f App eals For th e First C ircuit
No. 04-1519 MEGAN McLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. BOSTON HARBOR CRUISE LINES, INC.,; MODERN CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERR ATA SHEET The op ini on of thi s c our t, iss uedAu gus t 1 7, 200 5, sho uldbe am end ed as fol low s: On cov er she et: "B rie n E . L ewi s" is rep lac ed wit h "Br ianE. Le wis " On cov er she et: Af ter"C aro l B . F ein ber g," in ser t "At tor ney , O ffi ce of the So lic ito r," On pag e 2 , l ine 6: In ser t p eri od aft er "In c" so tha t "Bo sto n H arb or Cru ise Li nes , I nc" be com es "Bo sto n H arb or Cru ise Li nes , I nc. " On pag e 9 , l ine 5: Ab bre via te "Un ite d S tat es" to "U .S. "
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10880 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(October 3, 2017)

Jillian M. Jewell, Yvette Rhodes, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Taylor G. Stout, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Edwin Hernandez, Pro Se

Before HULL, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rosanne Brady, appointed counsel for Edwin Hernandez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L,Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit the appeal is.correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hernán-*588dez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 11

                        WESTWOOD FINANCIAL CORPORATION


             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                    Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                    December 31, 1996       December 31, 1996


      Net Income....................       $215,000               $234,000
                                           ========               ========


      Primary and fully diluted

      Average shares outstanding....        646,672                581,701
                                           ========               ========


      Per share amount..............          $0.33                  $0.40
                                           ========                =======



Earnings per share of common stock for the three and nine months ended  December
31, 1996 have been  determined  by dividing net income for the nine month period
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6390 

To amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to permit the refusal of 

credit to aliens who do not have lawful status in the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. SELF (for himself, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. BIGGS, and Mr. WEBER of 

Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Consumer Credit Protection Act to permit 

the refusal of credit to aliens who do not have lawful 

status in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reinforcing Immigra5 tion Status for Credit Knowledge Act’’ or the ‘‘RISK 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6390 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFUSAL OF CREDIT TO ALIENS WITHOUT LAWFUL 

2 STATUS. 

3 Section 701(b) of the Consumer Credit Protection 

4 Act (15 U.S.C. 1691(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in6 serting a semicolon; 

7 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking the period at 

8 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(6) to refuse to extend credit to an alien who 

11 does not have lawful status in the United States 

12 under the immigration laws (as such terms are de13 fined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nation14 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB