alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Saitta J. (1990). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

0 4 4' Douglas cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Charles H. Hill Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'We have reviewed all of the proper person documents submitted in this matter and we conclude no relief is warranted for the reasons stated above.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,392
<SECURITIES>                                    11,948
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,496
<PP&E>                                           2,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                     930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,233
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,475)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,475)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1      Press Release







PRESS RELEASE
February 28, 2003

                                For further information contact:
                                David M. Bradley
                                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                825 Central Avenue
                                Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                515-576-7531

             NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. INCREASES DIVIDEND 16.7%

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.21 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003. This amount is an
increase of 16.7% compared to the previous dividend rate. The dividend will be
payable to all stockholders of record as of March 17, 2003 and will be paid on
April 7, 2003.

Since 1997, North Central Bancshares annual dividends have increased from $0.25
per share to $0.84 per share, an increase of 236%.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 9
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mount Pleasant,
Perry and Ankeny, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal
Savings Bank of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Bank's deposits are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is
traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0242 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

 

 Plaintiff and Appellee, 

 v. 

JOURNEY RYDER JOHN WIENKE, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

 

ORDER 

Counsel for Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for leave to file an outof-time motion to extend the deadline for filing of the Reply Brief in this matter. 

Wienke’s reply was originally due on March 3, 2022. The State does not oppose 

Wienke’s motion. 

 THEREFORE, no good cause appearing otherwise, Wienke’s Motion is 

GRANTED. Counsel for Wienke shall prepare and file the Reply Brief in this 

matter on or before April 3, 2022. No additional requests for extension shall be 

granted. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 9 2022

03/09/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0242
# Climate Change: Engagement on all Levels Curt Spalding 

# August 14., 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1

# “. . . those who claim the science is unsettled or action 

# is too costly are simply trying to ignore the problem . . .”

-Henry M. Paulson Jr.

# “Climate change ... can add to the challenges of global instability, 

# hunger, poverty, and conflict.”

-Chuck Hagel, United States Defense Secretary

# INCREASE IN EXTREME PRECIPITATION

# Mitigation: Emissions Reduction Reducing Carbon Pollution Accelerating Clean Energy

# The Clean Power Plan Proposal Addresses the Largest Source of Green House Gas Emissions in the U.S.

17State 2012 Fossil Emission Rate 1 Interim Goal (2020 -

2029 average)2 Final Goal (2030 and thereafter)2 Connecticut 844 597 540 Maine 873 393 378 Massachusetts 1,001 655 576 New Hampshire 1,119 546 486 Rhode Island 918 822 782

# Clean Power Plan focuses on four building

blocks as strategies for states to achieve reductions goalsEfficiency

Improvements Dispatch changes to existing natural gas combined cycle (CC) Renewable Energy Certain Nuclear Demand -side energy efficiency programs 

# Strategy EPA used to calculate the state goal

# States and Communities with Programs that Reduce Carbon Pollution

218/27/2014 22% 12%

-20%

-71%

-93% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

New England GDP Total Generation CO2 Emissions NOx Emissions SO2 Emissions Data Sources: 2012 ISO New England Electric Generator Air Emissions Report, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis 

# New England Economic Growth and ISO New England System Emissions23 

# Transportation

# All of the Above Energy Strategy: Promoting Sustainable Approaches

EPA Programs that are reducing our carbon footprint across sectors while promoting sustainability


# • SMARTWAY: Freight Transportation


# • ENERGY STAR
• GREEN CHILL
• FOOD RECOVERY CHALLENGE27 27 

# Dynamics

Carriers: • Save fuel & money • Attain preferred status with shippers • Earn recognition 

## EPA: • Provide platform & tools • Bring agencies & 

### industry together • Show success 

## Shippers : • Choose efficient carriers • Optimize mode choice • Shrink carbon foot print • Earn recognition 

## Logistics: • Help both • Earn recognitionBoston Harbor - MWRA Slide 4 getty images Slide 6 chart source: IPCC Slide 9 by Bert Kaufmann , Slide 28 MWRA Deer Island http://www.flickr.com/photos/rawhead/4376312654/ Slide 25 www.europeanceo.com
#### VOTER VERIFIED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation, Election Systems & Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees

2016-2272

2016-2273

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 20, 2017

*978Anthony Italo Provitola, DeLand, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert M. Evans, Jr., Senniger Powers LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Kyle G. Gottuso, Marc Wade Vander Tuig.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Clevenger and Reyna, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Susan Mae POLK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-15206

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2017*

Filed July 3, 2017

Susan Mae Polk, Pro Se

Neill Tseng, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jennifer S. Wang, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ-USAO, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Susan Mae Polk, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action arising out of her request for documents relating to an investigation of her and a particular case file number. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin.,*836 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Polk failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation did not conduct a reasonable search for all responsive documents. *See Hamdan v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*797 F.3d 759, 770-71 (9th Cir. 2015) (setting forth requirements for demonstrating adequacy of search for documents).

Contrary to Polk’s contentions, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Polk’s motions to strike. *See Nurse v. United States,*226 F.3d 996, 1000 (9th Cir. 2000) (standard of review for district court’s decision to strike under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying costs to Polk, because the district court properly determined that Polk was not eligible for costs. *See*5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E); *Hiken v. Dep’t of Def.,*836 F.3d 1037, 1042-44 (9th Cir. 2016) (setting forth standard of review and requirements for fees and costs in a FOIA action).

Polk’s fifth motion for an extension of time to file her reply brief (Docket Entry No. 41) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Crazy Woman Creek Bancorp,
Incorporated  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "report"),  we, Gary J. Havens,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and
John B. Snyder, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Gary J. Havens                             /s/John B. Snyder
-------------------------------------         ----------------------------------
Gary J. Havens                                John B. Snyder
President and Chief Executive Officer         Vice President and Chief Financial
                                                Officer



February 13, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         The undersigned, Robert J DeSantis, Chief Financial Officer of DSL.net,
Inc. (the "Company"), in connection with the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and filed on this date (the "Report"),
hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
(the "Report"), hereby certifies pursuant to the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the "Exchange Act) and fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the
Report. This certification is being provided pursuant to section 1350 of chapter
63 of title 18 of the United States Code and is not to be deemed a part of the
Report, nor is it to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Exchange Act or to
form a part of the Company's public disclosure in the United States or
otherwise.


By:  /s/ Robert J. DeSantis
---------------------------------
Robert J. DeSantis
Chief Financial Officer
DSL.net, Inc.
Date: April 14, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rafal ARCHULETA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11358 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 2, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Rafal Archuleta, Jr., Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Rafal Archuleta, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Archuleta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 23.2





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS


As independent  petroleum engineers,  we hereby consent to the reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gasco Energy,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the year
ended December 31, 2004, as well as in the Notes to the  Consolidated  Financial
Statements  included in such Annual Report, to Netherland,  Sewell & Associates,
Inc.,  independent  petroleum  engineers,   and  the  report  prepared  by  such
independent petroleum engineers appearing in this Annual Report.



                                 NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                        /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                By:  ________________________________________
                                        Frederic D. Sewell
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005
#### Karleen Crystal LINFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 15-35758

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 9, 2017 * Portland, Oregon

Filed June 13, 2017

Patrick N. George, Attorney, Rachel A. Miller, Racine Olson Nye Budge & Bailey, Chtd, Pocatello, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Syrena Case Hargrove, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, Lowell Sturgill, Jr., Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and RAYES, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge for the District of Ari*466zona, sitting by designation.

*466MEMORANDUM ***

Karleen Linford appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the United States in this Federal Tort Claims Act case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, *Szajer v. City of Los Angeles,*632 F.3d 607, 610 (9th Cir. 2011), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Linford to determine whether any triable issue of fact exists and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant law, *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). We affirm.

Linford asserted a negligence claim arising out of injuries she sustained while riding an all-terrain vehicle across a cattle guard on national forest land in Idaho. There is no dispute that, absent willful and wanton conduct, the United States is entitled to immunity under'Idaho’s recreational use statute, Idaho Code § 364604(d), because it allowed Linford to use the national forest land for recreational purposes without charge. There is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether the United States engaged in willful and wanton conduct. The Forest Service’s construction and maintenance of the cattle guard constitutes, at most, mere negligence.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

***

 xhiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ALEXANDER UCEDA, Appellant,

vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 68525 

# FILED

MAR 1 7 2016

Pt( 

### ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant Alexander Uceda's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge.

Uceda filed a timely petition on May 4, 2015. The district court denied the petition without appointing counsel. We conclude the district court abused its discretion by denying the petition without appointing counsel for the reasons discussed below.

NRS 34.750 provides for the discretionary appointment of postconviction counsel and sets forth the following factors which the court may consider in making its determination to appoint counsel: the petitioner's indigency, the severity of the consequences to the petitioner, the difficulty of the issues presented, whether the petitioner is unable to comprehend the proceedings, and whether counsel is necessary to proceed with discovery. The determination of whether counsel should be appointed is not necessarily dependent upon whether a petitioner raises issues in a petition which, if true, would entitle the petitioner to relief.

Uceda's conviction arose out of a jury trial, and his petition raised claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that may require TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERtS 4 pF SUPREME COURT

10) I 947A 

### e ig 

### '08472SaitTh , J. Pickering Hardesty J. development outside the record. Uceda is serving a significant sentence. In addition, Uceda alleged he was in forma pauperis and moved for the appointment of postconviction counsel.' The failure to appoint postconviction counsel prevented meaningful litigation of the petition. Thus, we reverse the district court's denial of Uceda's petition and remand this matter for the appointment of counsel to assist Uceda in the postconviction proceedings. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with
this order.

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Alexander Uceda Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
'At a hearing on the petition, Uceda's appellate counsel was allowed to withdraw, and Uceda's application to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. From the record, it appears the district court continued the matter for the appointment of counsel regarding the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel only, but at the subsequent hearing the district court advised that counsel was not needed to correct the judgment of conviction.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A artA.,
EXHIBIT 23.2


                                DURLAND & COMPANY
                            CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
                           A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
                              232A ROYAL PALM WAY
                             PALM BEACH, FL   33480
STEPHEN H. DURLAND        (561) 822-9995 * FAX 822-9942              MEMBERS OF:
-----------------                                      FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF CPAS
ALSO CERTIFIED IN CA, CO, GA, LA
MA, MD, MS, NC, NJ, NY, SC, TX, WI



SD Products Corp.
Atlanta, GA


INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

Ladies and Gentlemen:


We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the Post  Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of SD Products Corp., on Form SB-1
of our report dated  December  20,  2000,  on the  financial  statements  of the
company,  and for the year then ended  included  in the  Company's  2001  Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB.



                                               /s/ Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
                                                   Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.

Palm Beach, Florida
December 28, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1245

STEVEN FARR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, a branch of the United States Government; 

DJALMA A. BRAGA,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-02061-CMC)

Submitted: November 30, 2020 Decided: January 19, 2021

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Keffer, KEFFER LAW FIRM, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant. A. Lance 

Crick, Acting United States Attorney, Christie V. Newman, Assistant United States 
2

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM

Steven Farr appeals the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his suit under

the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680, and denying 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farr v. United States, No. 3:18-cv-02061-

CML (D.S.C. Dec. 3, 2018 & Feb. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**B F**  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 461 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NICOLE ABENIIA NOLI ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 8 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief . 04/01/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0461 

## FILED Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 1 2022

04/01/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0461