alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the annual report of Prime Air, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report").  I, Blaine Haug,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  April  30,  2004             /s/  Blaine  Haug
                                     -----------------
                                     Blaine  Haug
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer
                                     (Principal  Executive  Officer  and
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


                                       15
<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David L. Standig, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[771 NYS2d 260]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 8, 2002, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that claimant and a friend incorporated a business for the purpose of establishing an on-line information brokerage system, agreed on the division of stock and invested money for business expenditures. To that end, claimant, who was listed as chief financial officer on the corporate business cards, testified that his activities on behalf of the corporation consisted of seeking funding through making presentations, searching Web sites, contacting prospective investors and recently obtaining a marketing research study. Claimant admitted that such activities were focused on future income or profit once funding was obtained. Notwithstanding claimant’s assertion that the business is not operational, substantial evidence supports the finding of the Administrative Law Judge, adopted by the Board, that “claimant’s activities have surpassed those inherent to merely exploring the feasibility of establishing a business.” As claimant’s “activities were in furtherance of a plan that was intended to produce income” *(Matter of Savage [Commissioner of Labor],*253 AD2d 924, 924 [1998]), their current or ultimate profitability is not determinative. Thus, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision *(see Matter of Franke [Commissioner of Labor],*305 AD2d 919 [2003]; *Matter of Sichel [Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 771 [2003]). Furthermore, even if the Administrative Law Judge should have received into evidence claimant’s tax return and work search logs, any error in that regard was harmless inasmuch as the content of the documents was not in dispute *829
      *(see Matter of Williams [Commissioner of Labor],*262 AD2d 903, 904 [1999]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### Clara Lewis BROCKINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; Reese Palmer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1028

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

*277Clara Lewis Brockington, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clara Lewis Brockington seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because it is possible that Brock-ington could cure the defects in her complaint through amendment, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y,*807 F.3d 619, 623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Brockington to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED AND REMANDED*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6317 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6317

To require the Administrator of the General Services Administration to 
 submit a report describing a process for seeking public comment about 
 proposed changes to mandatory design standards for public buildings, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2023

  Ms. Titus introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the General Services Administration to 
 submit a report describing a process for seeking public comment about 
 proposed changes to mandatory design standards for public buildings, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF DESIGN STANDARDS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 6 months after the date of 
enactment of this section, the Administrator of the General Services 
Administration shall revise the process by which the Administrator 
updates or changes any P100 guidance document or other guidance 
document establishing mandatory design standards and performance 
criteria for federally owned buildings under the custody of the 
Administration.
    (b) Process.--The Administrator shall ensure that the process 
revised under subsection (a) requires--
            (1) a public comment period for any updates or changes to 
        the documents described in such subsection;
            (2) publication of such updates or changes in the Federal 
        Register and on the website of the General Services 
        Administration; and
            (3) a summary of any comments received during such public 
        comment period.
    (c) Report.--The Administrator shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
describing the revisions to the process required under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John L. Higgins, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Connetics
Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

    b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ John L. Higgins
--------------------------------------------
John L. Higgins
Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development
Chief Financial Officer
#### Thomas Newton, Respondent, *v.*Julian Hook, Appellant.

A judgment *by*default in an action to recover a payment of interest due upon a promissory note, where process was personally served and defendant appeared, but did not answer, is conclusive evidence against a defence of usury interposed in an action between the same parties, brought to recover the principal of said note. (Lott, Ch. 0., dissenting.)

(Submitted September 30, 1871;

decided January term, 1872.)

This action was brought against defendant, as indorser, to recover the amount of these promissory notes, payable in one, two and three years respectively, with interest semiannually. Defense, usury. Plaintiff proved a judgment, *677recovered in the District Court for the third judicial district in the city of Hew York, in his favor, against defendant and the maker of the note,, in an action brought to recover a payment of interest due upon two of the notes; the complaint was personally served; defendant appeared by counsel, but no answer was interposed, and judgment was taken by default. All the notes grew out of the same transaction; defendant here offered evidence to prove his defense of usury; objected to by plaintiff upon the ground that defendant was estopped by the judgment in the District Court; evidence rejected. *Held,*no error, and that the judgment in the District Court was conclusive.

*Ra/ndol/ph, Alexander da Green*for the appellant.

*Samuel Hand*for the respondent.

Hunt, 0., reads for affirmance.

Lott, Ch. C., reads for reversal.

For affirmance, Hunt, Gbay and Eabl, CC.

For reversal, Lott, Ch. 0.; Leonabd, C., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### DELING ZHAO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70286

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 3, 2017

Thomas J. Tarigo, Esquire, Law Offices of Thomas J. Tarigo, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Matthew Allan Spurlock, U.S. Department Of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, . and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Deling Zhao, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. *Shrestha v.*
      *372
      *Holder,*590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies regarding Zhao’s house church attendance and the name of the doctor who treated her in 2007, the IJ’s observations about Zhao demeanor while testifying about the n^me of the doctor, and her evasive testimony regarding her attempts to contact Chen. *See id.*at 1048 (9th Cir. 2010) (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances); *Huang v. Holder,*744 F.3d 1149, 1155 (9th Cir. 2014) (giving special deference to findings based on demeanor). Zhao’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Zhao’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. *See Huang,*744 F.3d at 1156.

Finally, Zhao’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and Zhao does not point to any other evidence that compels the conclusion it is more likely than not she would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in China. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit  99.1

CERTIFICATION  OF  THE  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

I,  Joseph  F. Ollivier, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for
Datigen.com,  Inc.  certify  that:

     1.  I  have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Datigen.com, Inc.:

     2.  Based  on  my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3.  Based  on  my  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report.

Dated:  March  17,  2003
/s/  Joseph  F.  Ollivier
Joseph  F.  Olliver
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Immune Responses to Blood Transfusion.
    Date: March 22, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Michael P. Reilly, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 208-Z, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7975, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb899e92979782968bbb9593979992d5959293d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3644535f5a5a4f5b4676585e5a545f18585f5e18515940">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 22, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04126 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
10.38





COGNOVIT
PROMISSORY NOTE OF


JOHN
D. OIL AND GAS COMPANY







$600,000
            April 7,
    2009




For value
received, the undersigned, promises to pay to the order of Great Plains
Exploration, LLC (“Maker”) the principal sum of six hundred thousanddollars($600,000.00)with interest
payable at the rate of 8.0% per year.  Principal is payable in the
amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per month plus
accrued but unpaid interest on the twenty-fifth date of each month beginning on
May 25, 2009.  This Note replaces a $600,000 cognovit promissory note
issued by Maker to John D. Oil and Gas Company on February 13, 2009, which note
is hereby cancelled.





The
indebtedness evidenced hereby may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time
without penalty or notice.





Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary which may be provided for, or implied by, the other
terms of this Note, the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and
unpaid interest and any other charges, advances and fees, if any, outstanding
hereunder, shall be due and payable in full on demand if the maker is more than
thirty (30) days in arrears under this Note.





The Maker
waives demand presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest and of
non-payment, and any and all lack of diligence or delays in collection or
enforcement of this Note, and expressly consents to any extension of time of
payment hereof, or any other indulgence of forbearance, any of which may be made
without notice to any party and without in any way affecting the personal
liability of any party.





The
undersigned authorize any attorney-at-law to appear in any court of record in
Lake County, Ohio after the indebtedness evidenced hereby becomes due in
accordance with the terms hereof, whether by acceleration or otherwise, and to
thereupon waive the issuing and service of process, waive presentment, demand,
notice of dishonor, protest and notice of non-payment, and to confess judgment
against the undersigned Makers, in favor of the holder hereof for the amount
then appearing due together with the costs of this suit, and thereupon to waive
all errors and all rights of appeal and stays of execution.





WARNING:
BY SIGNING THIS PAPER, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO NOTICE AND COURT
TRIAL.  IF YOU DO NOT PAY ON TIME, A COURT JUDGMENT MAY BE TAKEN
AGAINST YOU WITHOUT YOUR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND THE POWERS OF A COURT CAN BE USED
TO COLLECT FROM YOU REGARDLESS OF ANY CLAIMS YOU MAY HAVE AGAINST THE CREDITOR
WHETHER FOR RETURNED GOODS, FAULTY GOODS, FAILURE ON HIS PART TO COMPLY WITH THE
AGREEMENT, OR ANY OTHER CAUSE.




JOHN
      D. OIL AND GAS COMPANYBy:
      /s/ Gregory J.
      Osborne
                  
                  Gregory
      J. Osborne, President and Chief Operating
    Officer
Commercial License Requests under the Subscription and License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3(B) 
 Execution Version 
 [***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. 
 APPENDIX 4.3(a) 
 COMMERCIAL LICENSE REQUEST FORM 

(To be completed for each Commercial Target) 
 Target requested pursuant to Section 4.3 of the Subscription and License Agreement (define: by common name(s), accession number, and amino acid sequence, if possible): 

[***] 
 Type of Commercial License
Requested: Commercial Therapeutic License 
  

									
	ONCOMEDPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 		 	MORPHOSYS AG
					
	By:	 	 /s/ John A. Lewicki
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ I.A. Christine Rothe

					
	Name:	 	 John A. Lewicki
	 		 	Name:	 	 Christine Rothe

					
	Title:	 	 SR VP, R&D
	 		 	Title:	 	 Senior Manager, Alliance Manager

					
	Date:	 	 28th April, 2008
	 		 	Date:	 	 6th May 2008

				
		 		 		 	MORPHOSYS AG
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Harald Watzka

					
		 		 		 	Name:	 	 Harald Watzka

					
		 		 		 	Title:	 	 Director, Head of AM

					
		 		 		 	Date:	 	 6th May 2008


 [to be filled out by MORPHOSYS:] Does the Commercial License include a Clinical Monitoring License? (please circle)
[***] 







 APPENDIX 4.3(a) 

COMMERCIAL LICENSE REQUEST FORM 
 (To be completed for each Commercial Target) 
 Target requested pursuant to
Section 4.3 of the Subscription and License Agreement (define: by common name(s), accession number, and amino acid sequence, if possible): 

[***] 
 Type of Commercial License
Requested: Commercial Therapeutic License 
  

									
	ONCOMEDPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 		 	MORPHOSYS AG
					
	By:	 	 /s/ John A. Lewicki
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ I.A. Christine Rothe

					
	Name:	 	 John A. Lewicki
	 		 	Name:	 	 Christine Rothe

					
	Title:	 	 SR VP, R&D
	 		 	Title:	 	 Senior Manager, Alliance Manager

					
	Date:	 	 17th April, 2008
	 		 	Date:	 	 28th April 2008

				
		 		 		 	MORPHOSYS AG
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Harald Watzka

					
		 		 		 	Name:	 	 Harald Watzka

					
		 		 		 	Title:	 	 Director, Head of AM

					
		 		 		 	Date:	 	 28th April 2008


 [to be filled out by MORPHOSYS:] Does the Commercial License include a Clinical Monitoring License? (please circle)
[***] 

  
 [***] Certain information
in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.