alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michelle D. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee

No. 17-60284 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 26, 2017

Kevin Stuart Wiley, Jr., Wiley Law Group, P.L.L.C., Dallas, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant

Curtis Clarence Pett, Esq., Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, David A. Hubbert, William M. Paul, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

There has been no legal error in the final order of the Tax Court. Petitioner’s claim of fraud upon the court has no justification. Even if Petitioner sees a problem with the mistake of the deficiency listing, no fraud even can change the jurisdiction *442of the court. *See Smith v. Booth,*823 F.2d 94 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,653
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,053
<PP&E>                                           1,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                     735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,032)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,465
<SALES>                                             32
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   331
<CGS>                                               53
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       53
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
ex10-07.htm




Exhibit 10.07

















 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 



5
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-KSB
  1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934 and2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of
    operations of the Company.  Date: March 29, 2006

By: /s/ Richard M. OsborneRichard M. OsborneChairman of the Board and Chief
    Executive OfficerDate: March 29, 2006

By: /s/ C. Jean MihitschC. Jean MihitschChief Financial Officer  37
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04101]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: National Artificial Intelligence Research 
Resource Task Force (84629).
    Date and Time: April 8, 2022, 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.
    PLACE: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Virtual 
meeting attendance only.
    To attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the 
virtual meeting link to the following email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e487898197978589a48a9782ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f7f9f1e7e7f5f9d4fae7f2baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Brenda Williams, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#610316080d0d08000c210f12074f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315346585d5d58505c715f42571f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: The Task Force shall investigate the 
feasibility and advisability of establishing and sustaining a National 
Artificial Intelligence Research Resource; and propose a roadmap 
detailing how such resource should be established and sustained.
    Agenda: In this meeting, the Task Force members will deliberate on 
the Task Force's interim report to the President and Congress. The Task 
Force members will also discuss their work plan for the remainder of 
2022 and identify the key issues to study as they develop 
implementation-focused recommendations for inclusion in their final 
report.

    Dated: February 22, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-04101 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Tara Chand SINGHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steven MNUCHIN,* Secretary of the Treasury the Executive Branch of the United States Government, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-55461

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Filed April 25, 2017

Tara Chand Singhal, Pro Se

Thomas D. Coker, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Jonathan S. Cohen, Attorney, Geoffrey Klimas, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 Steven Mnuchin has been substituted for his predecessor, Jack Lew, as Secretary of the Treasury under Fed. R. App. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Tara Chand Singhal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing Singhal’s action against the Secretary of the Treasury alleging that a Tax Court judge violated Singhal’s due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of sovereign immunity. *Jachetta v. United States,*653 F.3d 898, 903 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Singhal’s claim for monetary damages for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity. *See FDIC v. Meyer,*510 U.S. 471, 476-78, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994) (the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity for constitutional torts); *Gilbert v. DaGrossa,*756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir. 1985) (United States is immune from suit unless it has expressly waived its sovereign immunity, and sovereign immunity cannot be circum*472vented by naming officers and employees of the United States as defendants).

We reject as without merit Singhal’s contentions that the district court judge was biased and the dismissal of his action was a violation of the First Amendment.

Defendant's request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 14) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT ZACHARY EDMUND STACEY,

Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D21-1344 September 23, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Mark J. O'Brien, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
May 22, 2015

Mr. Lautaro Cline

8327 Aster Avenue Oakland, CA 94605

Dear Mr. Lautaro Cline:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 14, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1001), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITES EXCHANGE**
 **ACT
OF 1934, AS AMENDED (THE “EXCHANGE ACT”), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**
 **TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**  **2002**
  I, Kirby
G. Pickle, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of DSL.net, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  [Paragraph
omitted in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) transition
instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986.]
 
 (c)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
  By: */s/
Kirby G. Pickle*
 Kirby G.
Pickle
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Date:
March 23, 2005
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.15
















CONSENT OF DAVID VACHON







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, David Vachon, participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of a technical report entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, 2011 Geological Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec” completed in February 2012 (the “Report”) concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.4.4 Geological Setting ; 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.4.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,










	
	/s/  David Vachon


	Name:  David Vachon, P.Geo.



















May 14, 2012
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, James J. McNamara, Chief Executive Officer of National Auto Credit, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
do hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ James J. McNamara
--------------------------------------------
Name:  James J. McNamara
Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 18, 2003











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to National Auto Credit, Inc. and
will be retained by National Auto Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       39
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 2.3

                               Amendment to Bylaws
                                       of
                     MDU COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

         Article V, Section 3 of the Bylaws was amended by adding the following
paragraph thereto:

               The Corporation (and its transfer agent or registrar, if any)
               shall refuse to register any transfer of shares of stock,
               warrants or other securities issued by the Corporation not
               made in accordance with the provisions of Regulation S under
               the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
               pursuant to registration under the Securities Act, or pursuant
               to an available exemption from such registration.
#### Christine R. SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KELLY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-60702

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 17, 2017

*352Robert Nicholas Norris, Louis Hanner Watson, Jr., Esq., Watson & Norris, P.L.L.C., Jackson, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Steven M. Potter, Rick J. Patterson, Potter, Deagostino, O’Dea & Patterson, Auburn Hills, MI, Amy C. Felder, Wilkins Patterson, P.A., Jackson, MS, for Defendant-Appellee

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Christine Simpson sued her former employer, Kelly Services, Incorporated (“Kelly”), claiming that her termination violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. The district court granted Kelly’s motion for summary judgment based on judicial estoppel because Simpson had failed to disclose her claim against Kelly in her bankruptcy proceedings.

We have reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law and have heard the arguments of counsel. The district court faithfully applied the requirements of *Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc.,*677 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2012), regarding judicial estoppel, to these facts. In particular, the court explained why, under the applicable law, Simpson cannot reasonably contend that her failure to disclose was inadvertent.

The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned order entered on September 26, 2016.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of Futures Strategic Trust (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|August 14, 2006
Time Sharing Termination Letter



 Exhibit 10.2 
 [ALCS Letterhead] 
 May 17, 2012 
 BY HAND 
 Mr. Michael E. Szymanczyk 

6601 West Broad Street 
 Richmond, Virginia 23230

  

	 	Re:	    Termination of Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement 

 Dear Mr. Szymanczyk: 
 In connection with your retirement, we confirm that the Time Sharing
Agreement, dated January 28, 2009, between you and Altria Client Services Inc. will terminate effective at 12:01 a.m. on May 18, 2012. Invoices for any charges incurred through the date of termination will be forwarded in the ordinary
course of business and will be payable on the terms set forth in the Time Sharing Agreement. 
 Best regards. 

Altria Client Services Inc. 
  

					
			
	By: 	 	/S/ RODGER W. ROLLAND	 	 


					
	Name:	 	Rodger W. Rolland	 	
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Compensation,
 Benefits & HR Services


  

					
	AGREED TO AS OF THE DATE INDICATED:
			
	/s/ MICHAEL E. SZYMANCZYK	 	 	 	
	Michael E. Szymanczyk	 	
	Date: May 17, 2012
SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries











EXHIBIT 32.2




Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 (this "report"), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the "registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




/s/ James R. Segreto

James R. Segreto

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and

Secretary



May 13, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









Ex-4