alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             190,809
<SECURITIES>                                     8,213,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,404,109
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,404,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              166,094
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             93
<COMMON>                                            10,560
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,227,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,404,109
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   213,624
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   103,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    110,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                110,611
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       110,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .12
        



</TABLE>
2015 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-4-2015

USA v. Dung Bui

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

This August is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2015 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Dung Bui" (2015). 2015 Decisions. Paper 823.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015/823
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11-3795

_____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DUNG BUI

a/k/a

DANNY BUI

 Dung Bui,

 Appellant 

______________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Crim. Action No. 5-08-cr-00427-002)

District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

June 26, 2014

______________

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, and FUENTES, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges.

______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

______________

Although the panel denied rehearing in this matter, it agrees that two changes to 

the opinion should be made as suggested by the government. Accordingly, an amended 

opinion shall be issued. The judgment of this Court shall not be altered.
By the Court,

s/Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. 

Circuit Judge

Dated: August 4, 2015
**EXHIBIT 12.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Joseph Fuda, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Micromem TechnologiesInc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: February 28, 2006 /s/ Joseph Fuda     Joseph Fuda  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal executive officer)
Order entered June 12, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 00852
- CR
LEROY SHERARD JACKSON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. F11
- 34319
- T



### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly , we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees , and court appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copie s of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1      Press Release









PRESS RELEASE
August 23, 2002                 For further information contact:
                                David M. Bradley
                                Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                                North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                825 Central Avenue
                                Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                515-576-7531

                NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002. The dividend will
be payable to all stockholders of record as of September 16, 2002 and will be
paid on October 7, 2002.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 9
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mount Pleasant,
Perry and Ankeny, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal
Savings Bank of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Bank's deposits are
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is
traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                         ENDOVASCULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended Sept. 30,    Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
                                            ----------------------------    ----------------------------
                                                 1997           1996             1997          1996  
                                               -------        -------          --------       -------
<S>                                            <C>            <C>              <C>            <C> 
Net Loss                                       $(6,113)       $(3,507)         $(15,380)      $(9,399)
                                               =======        =======          ========       =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding       8,533          8,355             8,489         8,042

Common shares and options granted (using
  the treasury stock method assuming an 
  initial public offering price price of 
  $12.00) since December 15, 1994 included 
  pursuant to Securities and Exchange 
  Commission Rules                                  --             --                --            62
                                               -------        -------          --------       -------

Weighted average common and equivalent
  shares                                         8,533          8,355             8,489         8,042
                                               =======        =======          ========       =======          

Net loss per common and equivalent share       $ (0.72)       $ (0.42)         $  (1.81)      $ (1.16)
                                               =======        =======          ========       =======

</TABLE>
ACC CPI Safety & Health Training

Through May 20, 2011

April 2011 May 20, 2011 Total Through May 20, 2011

Job

Description Fully Complete Fully Complete Fully Complete InProgress

Instructor Online Instructor Online Instructor Online Started, not 

finished

Applicator 16 81 0 63 64 345 183

Helper 3 23 1 12 18 59 20

Other 4 113 14 58 99 493 284

Test Scores through May 12 90-100% 70-89% <70%

Percent achieving test scores 90.0% 8.1% 1.9%

Other 4 113 14 58 99 493 284

Supervisor 14 58 1 29 99 235 240

Total 37 275 16 162 280 1132 727

Total Students Fully Completed 

Through May 20, 2011

Total Students Started or Finished 

Through May 20, 2011

1412 2139
ex10-17.htm




Exhibit 10.17

















 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  






 







  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 



5
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




Perficient,
      Inc.


Austin,
      Texas




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No. 333-100490, No. 333-116549, No. 333-117216, No. 333-123177 and No.
      333-129054) and Form S-8 (No. 333-42626, No. 333-44854, No. 333-75666, No.
      333-118839 and No. 333-130624) of Perficient, Inc. of our reports dated March
      1,
      2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness
      of
      Perficient, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in
      the
      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2006.








Houston,
      Texas


March
      1,
      2007
Exhibit 99.1     Press Release




PRESS RELEASE
May 24, 2001           For further information contact:
                                David M. Bradley
                                Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                                North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                                825 Central Avenue
                                Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                                515-576-7531


                NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2001. The dividend will be
payable to all stockholders of record as of June 15, 2001 and will be paid on
July 6, 2001.

Recently, the Company commenced a new stock repurchase program for 100,000
shares, of which 67,100 shares remain to be repurchased. The Company has
1,838,480 shares of common stock currently outstanding.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 8
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mount Pleasant
and Perry, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank
of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa. The Bank's deposits are insured by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is traded on The
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                    12,071,072.43      13,580,406.90         0.00        182,057,352.73
A2                    44,770,552.44               0.00         0.00        673,747,967.00
B                      3,211,323.36               0.00         0.00         47,260,093.00
C                      4,307,285.04               0.00         0.00         62,028,874.00
D                      1,042,971.12               0.00         0.00         14,768,779.00
E                      3,016,220.33               0.00         0.00         41,352,582.00
F                      1,292,665.84               0.00         0.00         17,722,535.00
G                      2,460,478.68               0.00         0.00         41,352,582.00
H                        702,993.96               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
IO                     9,420,257.49               0.00         0.00                  0.00
J                        702,993.84               0.00         0.00         11,815,023.00
K                        702,993.96               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
L                        702,993.84               0.00         0.00         11,815,023.00
M                        702,993.96               0.00         0.00         11,815,024.00
N                      1,208,531.24               0.00         0.00         20,676,291.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R3                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
#### Matthew James LEACHMAN, Clerk Petitioner-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee

No. 17-20008

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 1, 2017

Matthew James Leachman, Pro Se

Edward Larry Marshall, Office of the Attorney General, Postconviction Litigation Division, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Matthew James Leachman, Texas prisoner # 903617 / Harris County # 01525039, was convicted of indecency *442with a child. He seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal, the district court’s order denying his motion for stay and abeyance of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding so that he could exhaust his state court remedies. Leachman contends that the district court erred by denying his motion, arguing that he had good cause warranting a stay, i.e., his reasonable confusion regarding whether the sole claim raised in his state habeas application was exhausted pursuant to the requirements set forth in Texas Government Code § 501.0081 and thus whether the application was properly filed for tolling purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(2).

A district court should grant a stay if it determines that the prisoner has shown good cause warranting a stay, that the prisoner has raised meritorious issues, and that the prisoner has not engaged in intentionally dilatory tactics. *Rhines v. Weber,*544 U.S. 269, 278, 125 S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005). Leachman has not satisfied this standard; at the very least, he has failed to show good cause excusing his failure to exhaust his state remedies. Thus, he has not established that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a stay. *See id.*at 278, 125 S.Ct. 1528.

The district court’s denial of the motion for stay and abeyance is AFFIRMED, Leachman’s motion for a COA is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY as no COA is required to review the district court’s ruling on this non-merits issue. *See Young v. Stephens,*795 F.3d 484, 494 (5th Cir. 2015).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that' this opinion should not be *442published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose SOSA-ALCIDES, also known as Jose Alcides-Sosa, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41537 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 15, 2017

John A. Reed, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael Lance Herman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

*386Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Sosa-Alcides appeals the 37-month within-guidelines sentence imposed on his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). Finding no error by the district court, we affirm. *See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez,*517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008).

The district court properly overruled Sosa-Alcides’s sole objection to the calculation of the guidelines sentencing range, which was that it was error to enhance the base offense level by eight levels under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2015) on the ground that Sosa-Alcides had 2010 and 2012 California felony convictions for receipt of a stolen motor vehicle and that each conviction constituted an aggravated felony conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). Sosa-Alcides was sentenced to more than one year in prison on each of those convictions under California Penal Code § 496d(a), which makes it a crime for anyone to buy or receive “any motor vehicle ... that has been stolen or that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft or extortion, knowing the property to be stolen or obtained.”

As Sosa-Alcides acknowledges, we have held that a conviction under a substantially similar statute, Texas Penal Code § 31.03, constitutes a conviction for an aggravated felony theft under § 1101(a)(43)(G). *See United States v. Rodriguez-Salazar,*768 F.3d 437, 438 (5th Cir. 2014). Sosa-Alcides suggests, however, that *Martinez v. Mukasey,*519 F.3d 532, 541 (5th Cir. 2008), controls the disposition of this appeal. He suggests further that his argument is not foreclosed because *Rodriguez-Salazar*did not specifically address § 496d(a), which Sosa-Alcides believes not to fit within the generic crime of theft because the statute criminalizes conduct that may involve the victim’s consent.

We conclude that *Rodriguez-Salazar,*768 F.3d at 437-38, resolves the issue at hand in the Government’s favor. In *Rodriguez-Salazar,*we emphasized that the theft question before us, namely, the eight-level offense enhancement for a violation of § 31.03, had not been before us in *Martinez,*which addressed whether a conviction under the federal bank fraud statute qualified as an aggravated felony. *Rodriguez-Salazar,*768 F.3d at 438.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 99.3   Press Release



PRESS RELEASE
February 27, 1998           For further information contact:
                            David M. Bradley
                            Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                            North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                            825 Central Avenue
                            Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                            515-576-7531


               NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND

David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced on February 27, 1998 that the
Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $.08 per share on the
Company's common stock for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1998. This amount
is an increase of 28% compared to the previous dividend rate. The dividend will
be payable to all stockholders of record as of March 16, 1998 and will be paid
on April 6, 1998.

The Company's common stock trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol
"FFFD". The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank of
Fort Dodge, is a federally chartered savings bank headquartered in Fort Dodge,
Iowa.