alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Banyan Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Gelmon, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                        
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Cory Gelmon 
  Cory Gelmon 
  President and Chief Financial Officer 
  April 14, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Banyan Corporation and will be retained by Banyan Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
MEETING LOG

DIRECTORATE FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES

SUBJECT: ASTM Ballot 12

- 06 Item #3 : Revision of F406

- 2012A Consumer Safety Specification for Non

- Full

- Size Baby Cribs/Play Yards

LOCATION: Via Conference Call

DATE: November 28, 2012

ENTRY DATE: November 28, 2012

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Patty Edwards , Greg Rea

COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Patty Edw ards, Greg Rea

NON

- COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Mo Anooshah, Steve Anzaroot, Dave Campbell, Bob Coughlin, Bob Crowley, Gary Gillett, Ron Hoffman, Vaibhav Kulkarni, Jonathan Lee, Julia Pritchett, Sam Shamie, Bill Suvak, Ken Walsh, Steve Tasker, Andrew Kutylo,

Ben Gross

MEETING SUMMARY:

This ballot item deals with the possible mi sassembly of bassinet/cradle accessories to play yards.

The task group reviewed the persuasive negative from Mr. Anooshah, and discussed possible solutions. Mr. Anooshah’s negative is as follows:

I understand the need of having some kind of test / verification when the misassembled product by the consumers present safety hazard to children. However, I disagree with this requirement since there are pla yards in the market th at do not present any safety concern such as fall, suffocation, or strangulation hazard when one of the key structural elements such as one of the metal bars is missing. In another word, why do we need to modify the product per this requirement if the prod uct is safe when one of the key

structural elements is not assembled at all?

The discussion centered around the fact that the key structural elements involved in the

fatal incident were attachment bars

– those used to secure and attach the bassinet

accessory to the play yard frame, and not the mattress support bars. Testing results of some products were discussed. The results showed that the mattress support bars on some products are redundant features, and thus, it was argued that they should not be required to be permanently attached. The option to limit the misassembly requirement to only those components that attach the bass inet accessory to the play yard was discussed.CPSC staff e xpressed a concern is that if ASTM exempt s the mattress sup port bars , that

the misassembly requirement would not address problems of mattress flatness when a support bar is missing in the bassinet accessory. The mattress flatness test is part of the

ASTM bassinet standard.

After much discussion, the task group agreed to c reate a requirement that is specific to components that attach bassinet/crad le accessories to the play yard

. And that the m attress support bar issue should be addre ssed in the bassinet standard. The solution agreed to by the task group was tha t bassinets with segmented mattress must meet the mattress fl atness test with and without any removable (not permanently attached) support bars. This information will be conveyed to the bassinet sub

- committee chairman.

A sub

- task group will develop new language for the play yard standard, and will circulate

it to the entire task grou p for comments. It will then be d iscussed at the January sub

committee meeting

. It is expected that after this meeting it will go to ballot.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
    reference of our reports dated October 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
    financial statements and schedule of Net2Phone, Inc., Net2Phone, Inc. managements
    assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
    and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Net2Phone,
    Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July
    31, 2005, in each of following:


Registration Statement No. 333-101734
  on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-83670
        on Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-51248
        on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-74354
        on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-85945
        on Form S-8; Registration Statement No. 333-56844
        (Amendment #1) on Form S-3/A; Registration Statement No. 333-78713
          (Amendment #1) on Form S-3/A;
  Registration Statement No. 333-110118
          (Amendment #2) on Form S-3/A;
  Registration Statement No. 333-111403
          on Form S-8;
  Registration Statement No. 333-121318
          on Form S-8;
  Registration Statement No. 333-124684
          on Form S-8; and
  Registration Statement No. 333-125880
        on Form S-3.


/s/
Ernst & Young LLP




New York, New YorkOctober 10, 2005



---
#### In the Matter of Jonathan F., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent. New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 886]

Appeal from an extension of placement and permanency hearing order of the Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2002, which directed the New York State Office of Children and Family Services to treat the respondent in aftercare, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

This appeal has been rendered moot since the extension of placement order by its own terms expired on October 18, 2002, and any determination of this Court will not affect the rights of the parties with respect to this controversy *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). The circumstances presented do not warrant addressing the issue raised under an exception to the mootness doctrine *(id.*at 714-715). Concur— Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe and Ellerin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Panolam Industries International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Muller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
March 28, 2008

|/s/ROBERT J. MULLERRobert J. Muller Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 106 (Monday, June 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 33145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13017]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface 
Wireless Communications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 223, Airport Surface Wireless 
Communications.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 26-28, 2013, from 9:00 a.m.-5:00 
p.m. daily.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Booz, Allen, Hamilton Offices, 
1201 Maryland Avenue SW., Suite 5140, Washington, DC 20036 (Across from 
the Portals Building) on June 26th and RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th 
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington DC 20036 on June 27-28.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0662/(202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 223. The agenda will 
include the following:

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 (Plenary at Booz Allen Facilities)

     Welcome, Introductions, Administrative Remarks.
     Agenda Overview.
     Review and Approve prior Plenary Meeting Summary and 
Action Item Status.
     General Presentations of Interest.
     MOPS: Review and Disposition of Comments.

Thursday, June 27, 2013 (Plenary at RTCA Facilities)

     MOPS: Review and Disposition of Comments.

Friday, June 28, 2013 (Plenary at RTCA Facilities)

     Profiles: Review CCB actions and Dispositions.
     Review/Approval of Document--Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards (MOPS) for the Aeronautical Mobile Airport 
Communication System (AeroMACS) and Profiles for Publication.
     Review letter regarding WiMAX Forum Reference Resolution.
     Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

     Issued in Washington, DC, on March 6, 2013.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-13017 Filed 5-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COHR INC.,
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,042
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,414
<INVENTORY>                                      6,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,334
<PP&E>                                           6,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,760
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           887
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,451
<SALES>                                         26,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,513
<CGS>                                           18,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATION**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Trend-Following Futures Fund L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”) I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, thegeneral partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 12,  2009                 |                 |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                          |                 |
|                                          |                 |
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |                 |
| Chief Financial Officer                       |                 |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                 |
|                                               |                      |  |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Art Technology Group, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned,
Robert D. Burke, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ EDWARD TERINO                               
| |                                                 
| | Edward Terino                                   
| | Senior Vice President, Finance and
    Chief    
| | Financial Officer                               
| | (principal financial and accounting
    officer)

Date: March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Art Technology
Group, Inc. and will be retained by Art Technology
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

85
Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS |
LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 
TORONTO MONTREAL

CONSENT OF SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP

The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby
consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated February 16,
2009 on the consolidated financial statements of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the
Company) included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F being filed by the Company,
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008.

We also consent to the use of our name and the use of our
opinion dated February 16, 2009 on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting for Micromem Technologies Inc. included in its Annual Report
on Form 20-F being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2008.

"SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP"

|Toronto, Ontario  | Chartered Accountants      
|----------------- | ---------------------------
|February 18, 2009 | Licensed Public Accountants



| | 1167 Caledonia Road     
| | ------------------------
| | Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1
| | Tel: 416 785 5353       
| | Fax: 416 785 5663       

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shane Douglas HOSKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30289

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

OCTOBER 2, 2017

Joseph E. Thaggard, Assistant U.S., Tara Elliott, Timothy John Racicot, Assistant U.S., USMI-Office of % U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S., Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Shane Douglas Hoskins, Greenville, IL, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Shane Douglas Hoskins appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hoskins contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether a district court had authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2). *See United States v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009). Contrary to Hoskins’s argument, his guidelines range remained life even under Amendment 782. Thus, his sentence was not “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), and the district court correctly concluded that he was ineligible for a sentence reduction. *See Leniear,*574 F.3d at 673; *see also United States v. Ornelas,*825 F.3d 548, 552-53 (9th Cir. 2016) (defendant’s applicable guideline range is determined without consideration of any departure or variance). Hoskins’s argument that the court nevertheless had discretion to grant a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) is without merit. *See Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 825-30, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00033-CR

Style: Eric Alonzo Greer

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: January 9, 2015

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File State’s Response Brief

Party filing motion: The State

Document to be filed: State’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: October 10, 2014

Number of previous extensions granted: 2 Current Due date: January 10, 2015

Date Requested: February 10, 2015

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: February 10, 2015

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: January 15, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE 9/26/97
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AND THE  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE
NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                  1000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                                            25089
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     21364
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        413
<INVENTORY>                                                       10241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  60309
<PP&E>                                                            12908
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     6566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    79882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             12377
<BONDS>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                            286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                        66887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      79882
<SALES>                                                           55011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  55011
<CGS>                                                             18973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     18973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  98255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (59220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       1333
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              (60553)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (60553)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (2.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (2.32)
        


</TABLE>