66532 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

above. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a safety zone for 

filming from a low flying helicopter on 

the Main Branch of the Chicago River in 

Chicago, IL. It is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0883 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T09–0883 Safety Zone; Main Branch 

of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. 

(a) Location. All waters of the Main 

Branch of the Chicago River between the 

Franklin-Orleans Street Highway Bridge 

and the Michigan Avenue Highway 

Bridge. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This rule will 

be enforced intermittently on October 1, 

2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. or an 

alternate date of October 2, 2016 from 6 

p.m. to 11 p.m. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23 of 

this part, entry into, transiting, or 

anchoring within this safety zone is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a 

designated on-scene representative. 

(2) This safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene 

representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 

is any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant or petty officer who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan to act on his or her 

behalf. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan or an on-scene representative 

to obtain permission to do so. The 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an 

on-scene representative may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel 

operators given permission to enter or 

operate in the safety zone must comply 

with all directions given to them by the 

Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or an 

on-scene representative. 

Dated: September 21, 2016. 

A.B. Cocanour, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2016–23318 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0221; FRL–9951–54– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Oklahoma; 

Revisions to Major New Source Review 

Permitting 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 66533 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving severable 

portions of revisions to the Oklahoma 

New Source Review (NSR) State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by 

the State of Oklahoma on June 24, 2010; 

July 16, 2010; December 27, 2010; 

February 6, 2012; and January 18, 2013. 

These revisions update the Prevention 

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and 

Nonattainment NSR (NNSR) permit 

programs to be consistent with federal 

permitting requirements and make 

general updates to the Oklahoma SIP to 

support major NSR permitting. We are 

taking this final action under section 

110, parts C and D of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on October 

28, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0221. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Adina Wiley, (214) 665–2115, 

wiley.adina@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ means the EPA. 

I. Background 

The background for this action is 

discussed in detail in our June 30, 2016 

proposal at 81 FR 42587. In that 

document we proposed to approve 

revisions to the General Provisions in 

the Oklahoma SIP submitted on July 16, 

2010 and December 27, 2010. These 

revisions included updates to the 

definitions and units, abbreviations, and 

acronyms used throughout the 

Oklahoma SIP; provisions establishing 

the ability to incorporate by reference 

federal requirements; revisions to the 

PSD increments regulated under the 

Oklahoma SIP; and updates to the 

Emission Inventory provisions. We also 

proposed to approve revisions to the 

Oklahoma PSD and NNSR Programs that 

had been submitted on June 24, 2010; 

July 16, 2010; February 6, 2012; and 

January 18, 2013. These proposed 

revisions had been submitted by the 

State of Oklahoma to address 

amendments to the federal PSD and 

NNSR regulations made in the following 

final rules: 

• NSR Reform Rule (67 FR 800186, 

December 31, 2002) and (68 FR 63021, 

November 7, 2003); 

• Implementation of the 8-hour 

Ozone (O3) NAAQS-Phase 2; Final Rule 

to Implement Certain Aspects of the 

1990 Amendments Relating to NSR and 

PSD as They Apply to Carbon Monoxide 

(CO), PM and O3 NAAQS (70 FR 71612, 

November 29, 2005); 

• PSD and NNSR: Reasonable 

Possibility in Recordkeeping (72 FR 

72607, December 21, 2007); 

• NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule (73 

FR 28321, May 16, 2008); 

• PSD for PM2.5—Increments, 

Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and 

Significant Monitoring Concentration 

(SMC) (75 FR 64864, October 20, 2010); 

• GHG Tailoring Rule (75 FR 31514, 

June 3, 2010) (specific to PSD permitting 

only); and 

• PSD and NNSR: Reconsideration of 

Inclusion of Fugitive Rule (76 FR 17548, 

March 30, 2011). 

The EPA provided a 30-day comment 

period on our proposed action. We did 

not receive any comments on our 

proposed action. As such, we are 

finalizing as proposed. 

II. Final Action 

We are approving the following 

severable revisions to the Oklahoma SIP 

submitted on June 24, 2010; July 16, 

2010; December 27, 2010; February 6, 

2012; and January 18, 2013. The 

revisions were adopted and submitted 

in accordance with the requirements of 

the CAA and the EPA’s regulations 

regarding SIP development at 40 CFR 

part 51. Additionally, we have 

determined that the submitted revisions 

to the Oklahoma PSD and NNSR 

programs are consistent with our major 

source permitting regulations at 40 CFR 

51.160–51.166 and the associated policy 

and guidance. Therefore, under section 

110 and parts C and D of the Act, the 

EPA approves into the Oklahoma SIP 

the following revisions: 

TABLE 1—REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA SIP 

Section Title Effective date Submittal date 

OAC 252:100–1–1 ............... General Provisions, Purpose ........................................ June 12, 2003 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–1–2 ............... General Provisions, Statutory definitions ...................... June 12, 2003 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–1–3 ............... General Provisions, Definitions ..................................... June 12, 2003 ...................

July 1, 2008 .......................

July 1, 2009 .......................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 1, 2012 .......................

July 16, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–1–4 ............... General Provisions, Units, Abbreviations and acronyms.June 12, 2003 ...................

July 1, 2009 .......................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 16, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100–2–1 ............... Incorporation by Reference (IBR) Purpose ................... July 1, 2012 ....................... January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–2–3 ............... IBR, Incorporation by Reference ................................... July 1, 2012 ....................... January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–3–4 ............... Air Quality Standards and Increments, Significant Deterioration Increments.June 15, 2005 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

December 27, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100, Appendix P .. Regulated Air Pollutants ................................................ June 15, 2007 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100, Appendix Q .. Incorporation by Reference ........................................... July 1, 2009 .......................

July 1, 2012 .......................

July 16, 2010. 

January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–5–1.1 ............ Definitions ...................................................................... June 15, 2007 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–5–2.1 ............ Emission Inventory ........................................................ June 11, 2004 ...................

June 15, 2007 ...................

July 16, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–1.1 ............ General Provisions, Definitions ..................................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–30 ............. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements for Attainment Areas, Applicability.June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
66534 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

TABLE 1—REVISIONS TO THE OKLAHOMA SIP—Continued 

Section Title Effective date Submittal date 

OAC 252:100–8–31 ............. PSD, Definitions ............................................................ June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 1, 2012 .......................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–8–32 ............. PSD, Source Applicability Determination ...................... Revoked June 15, 2006 .... Revoked July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–32.1 .......... PSD Ambient Air Increments and Ceilings ................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–32.2 .......... PSD Exclusion from Increment Consumption ............... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–32.3 .......... PSD Stack Heights ........................................................ June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–33 ............. PSD, Exemptions .......................................................... June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 1, 2012 .......................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–8–34 ............. PSD, Control Technology Review ................................. June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–35 ............. PSD Air Quality Impact Evaluation ............................... June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100–8–35.1 .......... PSD Source Information ............................................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–35.2 .......... PSD Additional Impact Analyses .................................. June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–36 ............. PSD Source Impacting Class I Areas ........................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–36.2 .......... PSD Source Obligation ................................................. June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–37 ............. PSD, Innovative Control Technology ............................ June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–38 ............. PSD, Actuals PAL ......................................................... June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–39 ............. PSD Severability ........................................................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–50 ............. Majors Affecting Nonattainment Areas (NNSR), Applicability.June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–50.1 .......... NNSR, Incorporation by Reference .............................. June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100–8–51 ............. NNSR, Definitions ......................................................... June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100–8–51.1 .......... NNSR Emission reductions and offsets ........................ June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

July 1, 2012 .......................

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

January 18, 2013. 

OAC 252:100–8–52 ............. NNSR, Applicability determination for sources in attainment areas causing or contributing to NAAQS 

violations.

June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

July 1, 2011 .......................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

February 6, 2012. 

OAC 252:100–8–53 ............. NNSR, Exemptions ....................................................... June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–54 ............. NNSR Requirements for sources located in nonattainment areas.June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–54.1 .......... NNSR, Ozone and PM10 precursors ............................. June 1, 2009 ..................... June 24, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–55 ............. NNSR, Source Obligation ............................................. June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–56 ............. NNSR, Actuals PAL ...................................................... June 1, 2009 .....................

June 15, 2006 ...................

June 24, 2010. 

July 16, 2010. 

OAC 252:100–8–57 ............. NNSR Severability ......................................................... June 15, 2006 ................... July 16, 2010. 

As a result of this final approval of the 

revisions to the Oklahoma SIP 

addressing the GHG Step 1 permitting 

requirements, we are removing the 

provisions at 40 CFR 52.1929(c), under 

which the EPA narrowed the 

applicability of the Oklahoma PSD 

program to regulate sources consistent 

with federal requirements because these 

provisions at 40 CFR 52.1929(c) are no 

longer necessary. 

The EPA finds that the February 6, 

2012, revisions to the Oklahoma NNSR 

program address all required NNSR 

elements for the implementation of the 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. We note 

that the Oklahoma NNSR program does 

not include regulation of VOCs and 

ammonia as PM2.5 precursors. However, 

as section 189(e) of the Act requires 

regulation of PM2.5 precursors that 

significantly contribute to PM2.5 levels 

‘‘which exceed the standard in the area’’ 

and Oklahoma does not have a 

designated PM2.5 nonattainment area, 

the revisions addressing only SO2 and 

NOX are not inconsistent with the 

requirements of the CAA. In the event 

that an area is designated nonattainment 

for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, or any other 

future PM2.5 NAAQS, Oklahoma will 

have a deadline under section 189(a)(2) 

of the CAA to make a submission 

addressing the statutory requirements as 

to that area, including the requirements 

in section 189(e) that apply to the 

regulation of PM2.5 precursors. 

The EPA is also finalizing a 

ministerial correction to 40 CFR 

52.1920(c) to remove a duplicate entry 

for the SIP approval of OAC 252:100–5– 

1. We are removing the first listing of 

this section; we retain the identical 

entry in numerical order under OAC, 

Title 252, Subchapter 5—Registration, 

Emissions Inventory, and Annual 

Operating Fees. 

III. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, we are finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with the requirements of 1 

CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

revisions to the Oklahoma regulations as 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 66535 

described in the Final Action section 

above. We have made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the EPA Region 6 office. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the Clean Air 

Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, described in 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by November 28, 

2016. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: September 21, 2016. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart LL—Oklahoma 

■ 2. In § 52.1920(c), the table titled 

‘‘EPA Approved Oklahoma Regulations’’ 

is amended by: 

■ a. Revising the entries for 252:100–1– 

1, 252:100–1–2, 252:100–1–3, 252:100– 

3–4, 252:100–5–1.1, 252:100–5–2.1, 

252:100–8–1.1, 252:100–8–30, 252:100– 

8–31, 252:100–8–33, 252:100–8–34, 

252:100–8–35, 252:100–8–36, 252:100– 

8–37, 252:100–8–50, 252:100–8–51, 

252:100–8–52, 252:100–8–53, and 

252:100–8–54; 

■ b. Adding a centered heading titled 

‘‘Subchapter 2: Incorporation by 

Reference’’ and entries for 252:100–2–1 

and 252:100–2–3 in numerical order; 

■ c. Adding entries in numerical order 

for 252:100–1–4, 252:100–8–32.1, 

252:100–8–32.2, 252:100–8–32.3, 

252:100–8–35.1, 252:100–8–35.2, 

252:100–8–36.2, 252:100–8–38, 

252:100–8–39, 252:100–8–50.1, 

252:100–8–51.1, 252:100–8–54.1, 

252:100–8–55, 252:100–8–56, 252:100– 

8–57, 252:100 Appendix P, and 252:100 

Appendix Q; and 

■ d. Removing the first centered 

heading titled ‘‘Subchapter 5. 

Registration, Emissions Inventory and 

Annual Operating Fees’’, the first entry 

for 252:100–5–1, and the entry for 

252:100–8–32. 

The additions and revisions read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1920 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
66536 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA APPROVED OKLAHOMA REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State 

effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Chapter 100 (OAC 252:100). Air Pollution Control 

Subchapter 1. General Provisions 

252:100–1–1 ......... Purpose ....................................... 6/12/2003 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–1–2 ......... Statutory definitions ..................... 6/12/2003 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–1–3 ......... Definitions .................................... 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP does not include revisions to 

the definition of ‘‘carbon dioxide equivalent emissions’’ for 

the GHG Biomass Deferral, effective on 7/1/2012 and submitted on 1/13/2013. 

252:100–1–4 ......... Units, abbreviations and acronyms.7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

Subchapter 2: Incorporation by Reference 

252:100–2–1 ......... Purpose ....................................... 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–2–3 ......... Incorporation by reference .......... 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

Subchapter 3: Air Quality Standards and Increments 

*******

252:100–3–4 ......... Significant deterioration increments.7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

Subchapter 5: Registration, Emissions Inventory and Annual Operating Fees 

*******

252:100–5–1.1 ...... Definitions .................................... 6/15/2007 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

*******

252:100–5–2.1 ...... Emission inventory ...................... 6/15/2007 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

Subchapter 8: Permits for Part 70 Sources 

Part 1. General Provisions 

*******

252:100–8–1.1 ...... Definitions .................................... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

Part 7. Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements for Attainment Areas 

252:100–8–30 ....... Applicability .................................. 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 66537 

EPA APPROVED OKLAHOMA REGULATIONS—Continued 

State citation Title/subject State 

effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

252:100–8–31 ....... Definitions .................................... 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP does not include paragraph 

(E) of the definition of ‘‘subject 

to regulation’’, effective on 7/1/

2011 and submitted 2/6/2012 

for Step 2 GHG permitting. 

SIP does not include revisions to 

the definition of ‘‘subject to regulation’’ paragraph (B)(i) for the 

GHG Biomass Deferral, effective on 7/1/2012 and submitted 

on 1/13/2013. 

252:100–8–32.1 .... Ambient air increments and ceilings.6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–32.2 .... Exclusion from increment consumption.6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–32.3 .... Stack heights ............................... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–33 ....... Exemptions .................................. 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP does not include OAC 

252:100–8–33(c)(1)(C) effective on 7/1/2011 and submitted 

2/6/2012. 

252:100–8–34 ....... Control technology review ........... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–35 ....... Air quality impact evaluation ....... 7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].SIP does not include OAC 

252:100–8–35(a)(2) effective 

on 7/1/2011 and submitted 2/6/

2012. 

252:100–8–35.1 .... Source information ...................... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–35.2 .... Additional impact analyses .......... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–36 ....... Source impacting Class I areas .. 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–36.2 .... Source obligation ......................... 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–37 ....... Innovative control technology ...... 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–38 ....... Actuals PALs ............................... 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–39 ....... Severability .................................. 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

Part 9. Major Sources Affecting Nonattainment Areas 

252:100–8–50 ....... Applicability .................................. 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–50.1 .... Incorporation by reference .......... 7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–51 ....... Definitions .................................... 7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–51.1 .... Emission reductions and offsets 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–52 ....... Applicability determination for 

sources in attainment areas 

causing or contributing to 

NAAQS violations.

7/1/2011 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–53 ....... Exemptions .................................. 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–54 ....... Requirements for sources located 

in nonattainment areas.

6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–54.1 .... Ozone and PM10 precursors ...... 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–55 ....... Source obligation ......................... 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–56 ....... Actuals PALs ............................... 6/1/2009 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100–8–57 ....... Severability .................................. 6/15/2006 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
66538 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA APPROVED OKLAHOMA REGULATIONS—Continued 

State citation Title/subject State 

effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Appendices for OAC 252: Chapter 100 

*******

252:100, Appendix 

P.

Regulated Air Pollutants .............. 6/15/2007 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

252:100, Appendix 

Q.

Incorporation by Reference ......... 7/1/2012 9/28/2016, [Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

§ 52.1929 [Amended] 

■ 3. Section 52.1929 is amended by 

removing paragraph (c). 

[FR Doc. 2016–23189 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2016–0315; FRL–9952–72– 

Region 4] 

Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Prong 4— 

2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 

PM2.5

Correction 

In rule document 2016–22887 

beginning on page 65899 in the issue of 

Monday, September 26, 2016, make the 

following correction: 

On page 65899, in the second column, 

under the DATES heading, in the first 

through third lines of that paragraph, ’’ 

[insert date 30 days after date of 

publication in the Federal Register].’’ 

should read ‘‘October 26, 2016’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2016–22887 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 90 

[PS Docket No. 15–199; FCC 16–113] 

Railroad Police Officers To Access 

Public Safety Interoperability and 

Mutual Aid Channels 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) provides railroad police 

officers access to the public safety 

interoperability channels. In this 

document, we amend our rules to 

permit railroad police officers to use 

public safety interoperability channels 

to communicate with public safety 

entities already authorized to use those 

channels. Specifically, we permit 

railroad police officers empowered to 

carry out law enforcement functions to 

use public safety interoperability 

channels in the VHF (150–174 MHz, 

and 220–222 MHz, UHF (450–470 

MHz), 700 MHz narrowband (769–775/ 

799–805 MHz)5 and 800 MHz National 

Public Safety Planning Advisory 

Committee (NPSPAC) bands (806–809/ 

851–854 MHz). Allowing railroad police 

officers to use these channels will 

promote interoperability, facilitate 

improved emergency response in 

railroad-related emergencies, and 

streamline access to these channels for 

emergency public safety 

communications. 

DATES: Effective October 28, 2016, 

except for section 90.20(a)(2)(xiv) which 

contain new or modified information 

collection requirements that require 

approval by the Office of Management 

and Budget under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The Federal 

Communications Commission will 

publish a document in the Federal 

Register announcing such approval and 

effective date. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Evanoff, Policy and Licensing Division, 

Public Safety and Homeland Security 

Bureau, (202) 418–0848 or 

john.evanoff@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Report 

and Order in PS Docket No. 15–199, 

FCC 16–113, released on August 23, 

2016. The document is available for 

download at http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ 

edocs_public/. The complete text of this 

document is also available for 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC Reference 

Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554. To request 

materials in accessible formats for 

people with disabilities (Braille, large 

print, electronic files, audio format), 

send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call 

the Consumer & Governmental Affairs 

Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202– 

418–0432 (TTY). 

In the Report and Order we amend the 

Commission’s rules to permit railroad 

police officers to use public safety 

interoperability channels to 

communicate with public safety entities 

already authorized to use those 

channels. Specifically, we permit 

railroad police officers empowered to 

carry out law enforcement functions to 

use public safety interoperability 

channels in the VHF (150–174 MHz, 

and 220–222 MHz, UHF (450–470 

MHz), 700 MHz narrowband (769–775/ 

799–805 MHz) and 800 MHz National 

Public Safety Planning Advisory 

Committee (NPSPAC) bands (806–809/ 

851–854 MHz). Allowing railroad police 

officers to use these channels will 

promote interoperability, facilitate 

improved emergency response in 

railroad-related emergencies, and 

streamline access to these channels for 

emergency public safety 

communications. 

Procedural Matters 

A. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

As required by the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended 

(RFA) the Commission prepared this 

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

(FRFA) of the possible significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities by the policies 

and rules adopted in this Report and 

Order. The Commission will send a 

copy of the Report and Order, including 

this FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for 

Advocacy of the Small Business 

Administration (SBA). In addition, the 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES