alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136531 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136531 

 COA: 284029 

DOUGLAS JAY CLARK, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Lenawee CC: 07-012999-FC,

07-013000-FC, 07-013001-FC,

07-013003-FH, 07-013005-FC,

 07-013006-FC, 07-013007-FC 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
U.S. Interactive, Inc.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-88033) on Form S-8 of U.S. Interactive, Inc. of our reports dated
February 9, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of U.S.
Interactive, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit)
and cash flows and related financial statement schedule for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which reports appear in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of U.S. Interactive, Inc.




KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 11074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04166]



[[Page 11074]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS22-03]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: This will be a virtual meeting via Zoom. Please visit the 
agency's homepage (www.asc.gov) and access the provided registration 
link in the What's New box. You MUST register in advance to attend this 
Meeting.
    Date: March 9, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. ET.
    Status: Open.

Reports
    Chairman
    Executive Director
    Grants Director
    Financial Manager
Action and Discussion Items
    Approval of Minutes
    December 8, 2021 Special Meeting Minutes
    Amendment to FY22 ASC Budget
    7-Hour National USPAP Update Course
    Selection of ASC Vice Chair

    How to Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting: The meeting will be open 
to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.asc.gov) and access the provided registration link in the What's 
New box. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. 
However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may 
refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or 
audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other 
electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC Meetings.

James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-04166 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:  April 2, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Richard M. OsborneRichard M. OsborneChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Date:  April 2, 2007
    By:
    /s/ C. Jean MihitschC. Jean MihitschChief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10329

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERNEST VERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CR-94-A-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Ernest Vera has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th

Cir. R. 42.2.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6407
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MANUEL RAMON LUNA, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR91-075-WMN, CA-95-1952-WMN) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Manuel Ramon Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Luna , Nos. CR-91-075-WMN; CA-95-1952-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1995; Feb. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

MICHAEL P. GUIDO :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2548 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1

- 18

- 859

(Supreme Court of Florida, Case No.
SC18

- 271)

Attorney Registration No. 49274

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 17 th day of January , 201 9

, having failed to respond to a Notice

and Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline,

Michael P. Guido is suspended for one year from the practice of law in the Commonwealth

of Pennsylvania. He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6620 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6620

To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to institutions of higher 
 education with endowment funds equaling or exceeding $5,000,000,000, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2023

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit Federal funds from being provided to institutions of higher 
 education with endowment funds equaling or exceeding $5,000,000,000, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Funding for Ivy League 
Schools Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROVIDED TO CERTAIN INSTITUTIONS 
              OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal 
funds may be provided to an institution of higher education that has an 
endowment fund equaling or exceeding $5,000,000,000 on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (b) Exception.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), an institution 
described in subsection (a) may receive Federal funds for projects or 
research that relate to a critical national function.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Endowment fund.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``endowment fund'' has 
                the meaning given such term in section 331 of the 
                Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1065).
                    (B) Aggregation of funds.--All endowment funds at 
                an institution of higher education shall be treated as 
                one endowment fund for the purposes of this section.
            (2) Institution of higher education.--The term 
        ``institution of higher education'' has the meaning given such 
        term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
        U.S.C. 1001).
            (3) National critical function.--The term ``national 
        critical function'' means a function of Government so vital to 
        the United States that its disruption would endanger national 
        security or operational control (as such term is defined in the 
        Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note)) of the southern 
        border, or any combination thereof.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus PARAMO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11383 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 1, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jesus Paramo, Pro Se

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Paramo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Paramo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Paramo’s response. We agree with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. We gener*294ally do not entertain claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that have not previously been presented to the district court and decline to do so here without prejudice to Paramo’s ability to bring such claims on collateral review. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. Paramo’s motion to reject counsel’s brief and to appoint new counsel is DENIED. *Cf. United States v. Wagner,*158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           9
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997   
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             46
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            786
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    15,035     
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         15,019
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            9,222
<LOANS>                                        27,646
<ALLOWANCE>                                       290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,275
<DEPOSITS>                                     28,658
<SHORT-TERM>                                    9,279
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               525
<LONG-TERM>                                     1,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          106
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 54,275
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,688
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,137
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   50
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,875
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,051
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,405
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,470
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (7)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   759
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        759  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                       213
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  276
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       5
<RECOVERIES>                                       19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              290 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0 
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1369
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1385
<OTHER-SE>                                          16
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1369
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
a.1



    body {
      color:#000000;
      background-color:#FFFFFF;
    }
    a  { color:#0000FF; }
    a:visited { color:#800080; }
    a:hover { color:#008000; }
    a:active { color:#FF0000; }
    -->

  
  

PYROTEC, INC. 

A DELAWARE CORPORATION

125-E Wappoo Creek Drive

Suite 202A

Charleston, South Carolina 29412 

1-800-PYROTEC

www.pyrotecus.com


May 15, 2012



Matthew Dekutoski

32484 Westlady

Beverly Hills, MI  48025


	RE:	ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Dear Mr. Dekutoski: 


	We are hereby inviting you to serve on the Board of Directors (the "Board") of PyroTec, Inc., a publicly traded entity incorporated in Delaware ("PyroTec").  Your acceptance of this invitation will be confirmed through execution of this correspondence below, and your execution of the enclosed Advisory Board Consulting and Compensation Agreement dated May 1, 2012 (the "Advisor Agreement").

	By executing this correspondence, and the Advisor Agreement, you are agreeing to comply with the duties of such an appointment under all applicable common laws, statutory laws, and rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.  Furthermore, you are agreeing to perform your advisory services consistent with the enclosed Bylaws of PyroTec.

	I am looking forward to a productive and long-term relationship.  Please feel free to contact our corporate counsel, Anthony R. Paesano at apaesano@paesanoakkashian.com or (248) 792-6886 with any questions.


Very truly yours,


/s/ John Burns


John Burns

Chief Executive Officer


Agreed:


/s/ Matthew Dekutoski		

Matthew Dekutoski


Enclosures

cc:	Anthony R. Paesano

	Board of Directors
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD F. ADAMS, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 412 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Barbra  E. Kocsis, certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2006                            |                  |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                               |                  |   |
| By                                                 | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                                   |
| Chief Financial  Officer                           |
|  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
II 

Calendar No. 571 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6633 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9355 113th Street in Seminole, Florida, as 

the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan Christian Knauss Memorial Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARMY SSG RYAN CHRISTIAN KNAUSS MEMO4 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 9355 113th Street in Seminole, 

7 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Army SSG 

8 Ryan Christian Knauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6633 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan 

5 Christian Knauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 571 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6633 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostKnauss Memorial Post Office Building’’. nole, Florida, as the ‘‘Army SSG Ryan Christian al Service located at 9355 113th Street in SemiNOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB