alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. James Franklin PUTNAM, also known as Tony Martinez, also known as Bobby Spiers, also known as Bob Watson, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-60165 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

Gaines H. Cleveland, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jay Tresca Golden, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee

James Franklin Putnam, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Franklin Putnam appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ *278of error *coram nobis*pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Putnam has completed his term of imprisonment but is still serving the five-year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction of hostage taking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203.

At all times, this court must be assured of its jurisdiction and the district court’s jurisdiction. *United States v. Key,*205 *F.3d 773, 774*(5th Cir. 2000). Because Putnam is still subject to an unexpired term of supervised release, he is “in custody” and ineligible for *coram nobis*relief. *See United States v. Scruggs,*691 F.3d 660, 662 n.1 (5th Cir. 2012); *United States v. Esogbue, 357*F.3d 532, 534 (5th Cir. 2004). Because Putnam is challenging his federal conviction, the district court should have construed his petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See Tolliver v. Dobre,*211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th Cir. 2000). The district court, however, lacked jurisdiction to do so because Putnam previously filed a § 2255 motion, and this court did not authorize the filing of a successive § 2255 motion. *See Hooker v. Sivley,*187 F.3d 680, 681-82 (5th Cir. 1999); 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED on the alternative ground that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Putnam’s petition. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). All pending motions are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Gregory C. Talbott is the Executive VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the"Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with thefiling by the Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

         the Report fully complies with the requirements of          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934          (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the          Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit tothe Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as theReport is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

November 12, 2002
/s/ Gregory C. Talbott
Dated 
Gregory C. Talbott
#### John W. GARDNER, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellant, v. Georgia H. HAMMONDS, Appellee.

No. 22841.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1966.

Macon L. Weaver, U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert J. Vollen, Jack H. Weiner, Attys., Dept, of Justice, John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. William Doolittle, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., L. Wayne Collier, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.

Max C. Pope, Levine, Fulford, Gwaltney & Pope, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court applied the proper standards of review of this case. We concur in its finding that no substantial evidence supports a reversal by the Secretary of his previous determination in favor of the appellee, Mrs. Hammonds. Therefore, the judgment is

Affirmed.
#### LIGHT *v.*OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

1. Insurance — Ambiguity—Parol Evidence — Hunters’ Accident Policy.

Parol testimony as to coverage of a hunters’ accident insurance poliey is immaterial where the policy is unambiguous.

2. Same — Accidental Death — Disease—Finding op Fact-.

Findings of trial judge in nonjury action under hunters’ accident insurance poliey that death of insured did not result from accident or other physical occurrence within purview of policy and that policy was unambiguous *held,*supported by record.

References for Points in Headnotes

[1] 29A Am Jur, Insurance §§ 1912, 1914.

[2] 5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 839.

Appeal from Oakland; Templin (Robert L.), J.

Submitted Division 2 May 6, 1968, at Lansing.

(Docket No. 3,901.)

Decided May 31, 1968.

Myrtle Light brought action on a hunters’ accident insurance policy against the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, for death of her husband, Floyd Y. Light, while hunting. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

*Powell, Peres, Carr & Jacques,*for plaintiff.

*Metry, Metry, Sanom, Ashare <& Goldman,*for defendant.

Per Curiam.

This nonjury action on a hunters’ accident insurance policy resulted in a judgment of no cause of action. Plaintiff appeals.

*570We concur in the finding of the trial judge that the policy is unambiguous, and we find the parol testimony as to coverage is immaterial.

The trial court’s finding that the death did not result from an accident or other physical occurrence within the purview of the policy is supported by the record.

Affirmed.

Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.
J-A13005-20

2020 PA Super 236

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Appellee

 v.

TIMOTHY OLIVER BARR II,

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 2347 EDA 2019

Appeal from the Order Entered August 2, 2019

in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-39-CR-0000279-2019

BEFORE: BENDER P.J.E., LAZARUS, J. and STRASSBURGER, J.*

CONCURRING OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.:FILED SEPTEMBER 25, 2020

I join the Majority in its entirety, and agree “the odor of marijuana 

does not per se establish probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of a 

vehicle[,]” thus requiring remand of this matter for the trial court to consider 

that factor, along with any other factors, in its probable cause analysis. 

I write separately to note my discontent with the Commonwealth’s 

reliance on the “high-crime area” factor in support of a finding of probable 

cause. I believe that the status of the neighborhood at issue as a “highcrime area” should not be relevant to the probable cause determination. 

People who live in poor areas that are riddled with crime do not have fewer 

constitutional rights than people who have the means to live in “nice”

neighborhoods.

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-A13005-20

- 2 -

President Judge Emeritus Bender and Judge Lazarus join in this 

concurring opinion.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6417 

To amend the Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act to provide for a 

prohibition on importation of energy products produced at refineries 

outside the Russian Federation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2023 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. BACON, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. SPARTZ, Mrs. 

RADEWAGEN, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. GOLDMAN of New York, Mr. SCHIFF, 

Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. TITUS, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. 

VARGAS, Mr. COHEN, Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. 

KHANNA, Mr. CARSON, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. MCCLELLAN, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. LYNCH, Mr. DELUZIO, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. COSTA, Mr. GARAMENDI, 

Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. LANDSMAN, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. 

EVANS, Ms. CROCKETT, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. 

THOMPSON of California, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. MAGAZINER, Mr. PAYNE, 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. MORELLE, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Ms. STEVENS, Ms. MENG, Mr. NADLER, Mr. NORCROSS, and 

Mr. TONKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act to 

provide for a prohibition on importation of energy products produced at refineries outside the Russian Federation. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6417 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Importation 

5 of Laundered Russian Oil Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ENERGY PROD7 UCTS PRODUCED AT REFINERIES OUTSIDE 

8 THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Ending Importation of Rus10 sian Oil Act (Public Law 117–109; 136 Stat. 1154) is 

11 amended— 

12 (1) by redesignating section 3 as section 4; and 

13 (2) by inserting after section 2 the following: 

14 ‘‘SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ENERGY PROD15 UCTS PRODUCED AT REFINERIES OUTSIDE 

16 THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 

17 ‘‘All products classified under chapter 27 of the Har18 monized Tariff Schedule that were produced at any refin19 ery that uses crude oil originating in the Russian Federa20 tion shall be banned from importation into the United 

21 States.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 4 of the 

23 Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act (Public Law 117– 

24 109; 136 Stat. 1154), as redesignated by subsection 

25 (a)(1), is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6417 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or 3’’ after 

2 ‘‘section 2’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘or 3’’ 

4 after ‘‘section 2’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-108501) and Form S-8(Nos. 333-34326) of eCollege.com of our report dated March 16, 2006,relating to the consolidated balance sheet of eCollege.com and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, whichreport appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K ofeCollege.com. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reporton management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting included in the annual report of eCollege.com on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 in those registration statements.

 

 
|   | /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|

 

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 16, 2006

 

----
MICHAEL Z. RIVERA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2976

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 26, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

Michael Z. Rivera, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Ernest COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1922

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 27, 2018

Ernest Coleman, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.
Amendment to Employment Agreement - Michel B. Moreno




 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is executed by and among Green Field Energy Services, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and
Michel B. Moreno, (“Employee”). 
 Recitals: 

On or about October 24, 2011, the Company and Employee executed an Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”). The
capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the meanings ascribed those terms in the Employment Agreement. 
 The Employment
Agreement stated that the Effective Date and the Start Date were each October 6, 2011, however, this was an error and the correct Effective Date and the correct Start Date were each May 1, 2011. 

As set forth in this Amendment, the parties have agreed to modify and correct both the Effective Date and the Start Date of the
Employment Agreement. 
 Agreement: 
 In consideration of the foregoing recitals and the covenants and agreements stated herein, the Company and the Employee agree as follows: 

1. The introductory paragraph of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

The “Effective Date” will be May 1, 2011, not October 6, 2011. 

2. Section 1.2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

The “Start Date” as defined in Section 1.2 will be May 1, 2011, not October 6, 2011. 

3. Miscellaneous. 
 A. The parties agree that the Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, except to the extent it has been expressly modified in this Amendment. 

B. The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment does not establish any precedent to any subsequent amendments. 

4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and
all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
executed this Amendment on the dates noted opposite their respective signature lines. 
  

							
	/s/ Michel B. Moreno	 		  	GREEN FIELD ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
	Michel B. Moreno, Individually	 		  		  	
	Date: April 13, 2012	 		  	BY:	  	/s/ Earl J. Blackwell
		 		  		  	         Name: Earl J. Blackwell
         Position: Secretary/ CFO

		 		  	Date: April 13, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BOWFIN KEYCON HOLDINGS, LLC; CHIEF POWER FINANCE II, LLC; CHIEF POWER TRANSFER PARENT, LLC; KEYCON POWER HOLDINGS, LLC; GENON HOLDINGS, INC.; PENNSYLVANIA COAL ALLIANCE; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA; INTERNATIONAL

BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS; AND INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS, BLACKSMITHS,

FORGERS AND HELPERS

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTME NT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND

PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY BOARD

APPEAL OF: CONSTELLATION ENERGY

CORPORATION AND CONSTELLATION ENERGY GENERATION, LLP,

Possible Intervenors :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 84 MAP 2022

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12 th day of October , 2022

, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED

.

See Pa.R.A.P. 501 (allowing an aggrieved party to file an appeal); In re Barnes

Foundation , 871 A.2d 792, 795 (Pa. 2005) (holding that the failure to secure intervenor

status foreclose s the ability to file a cognizable appeal).

The Motion to Quash is DISMISSED as moot.
Exhibit 31.2

Panolam Industries International, Inc.  Certification pursuant to Section 302  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Certification

I,
Vincent S. Miceli, as the principal financial officer of the registrant, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Panolam Industries International, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 31, 2009

/s/ VINCENT S. MICELI Vincent S. Miceli Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6160 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6160

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2024

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a lifespan 
                         respite care program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE CARE PROGRAM.

    Section 2905 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ii-4) 
is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through fiscal year 2024'' 
and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 11126 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:17

- cr - 00305

- VMC

- AAS

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus

SHANE DANIELS , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (June 28, 2019) Before TJOFLAT , JORDAN and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 18-11126 Date Filed: 06/28/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Stephen Langs , appointed counsel for Shane Daniels in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of t he relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Daniels’s conviction s and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 18-11126 Date Filed: 06/28/2019 Page: 2 of 2
# Jornal Oficial C 11A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-1010
  doi:10.3000/19771010.CA2014.011.por |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 11A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 57.o ano15 de Janeiro de 2014 |

ISSN 1977-1010

doi:10.3000/19771010.CA2014.011.por

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 11A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

57.o ano15 de Janeiro de 2014

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2014/C 011A/01 | Retificação do Anúncio de vaga de Diretor Executivo da Agência Ferroviária Europeia (AFE), em França (Agente temporário — grau AD 14) — COM/2014/10345 (JO C 6 A de 10.1.2014) | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

Retificações

2014/C 011A/01

Retificação do Anúncio de vaga de Diretor Executivo da Agência Ferroviária Europeia (AFE), em França (Agente temporário — grau AD 14) — COM/2014/10345 (JO C 6 A de 10.1.2014)

(JO C 6 A de 10.1.2014)

1

RECAPITULAÇÃO DOS JO C A CONCURSOS

Lista dos JO C A publicados no ano em curso.

Salvo indicação em contrário, os JO são publicados em todas as versões linguísticas.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |

5

6

11

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 15.1.2014 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 11/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2014

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 11/1

---

Retificação do Anúncio de vaga de Diretor Executivo da Agência Ferroviária Europeia (AFE), em França

(Agente temporário — grau AD 14)

COM/2014/10345

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 6 A de 10 de janeiro de 2014
  )

(2014/C 11 A/01)

Na página 4, «Apresentação das candidaturas», terceiro parágrafo, a hiperligação passa a ter a seguinte redação:

«https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/human-resources/seniormanagementvacancies/».

---