alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

As independent  petroleum  engineers,  we hereby consent to (i) the reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gasco Energy,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the
year  ended  December  31,  2003,  as well as in the  Notes to the  Consolidated
Financial  Statements  included in such Annual Report,  to Netherland,  Sewell &
Associates,  Inc.,  independent petroleum engineers,  and the report prepared by
such independent  petroleum  engineers appearing in this Annual Report, and (ii)
the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement No. 333-105974 on Form
S-8 of the Company of all references to Netherland,  Sewell & Associates,  Inc.,
independent  petroleum  engineers,  and the reports prepared by such independent
petroleum engineers appearing in this Annual Report.




                                      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                      By: /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                          ---------------------------------
                                      Frederic D. Sewell
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas
March 24, 2004
ex10-13.htm




Exhibit 10.13

















 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 



5
#### Samuel Galle, Resp’t, *v.*Adolphe Tode *et al.,*App’lts.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department,*

*Filed May 15, 1891.)*

Creditor’s action—General creditors cannot maintain.

General creditors of a firm cannot maintain an action, in aid of an attachment, in which they seek to have confessions of judgments made by a firm declared fraudulent.

*863Appeal from order denying injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing judgments and execution thereupon issued.

*E. J. Myers,*for app’lts; *A. J.*Simpson, for resp’t.

Van Brunt, P. J.

The plaintiffs are attaching creditors of the defendants Tode & Wulling, and certain other defendants, are judgment creditors by confession of the defendants Tode & Wulling, upon which executions had been issued to the defendants, the sheriffs of the counties of New York and Orange.

The plaintiffs alleging said confessions to be fraudulent have brought this action in aid of their attachment, seeking to have the said confessions and judgments declared fraudulent, and to have the sheriffs aforesaid restrained from proceeding under the executions above *mentioned;*and asking that the defendants account to the receiver, and when a judgment shall have been recovered by the plaintiffs against the defendants Tode & Wulling in the action in which the attachment is granted, that it be first paid out of the assets, property and effects of said defendants Tode & Wulling. In other words, the plaintiffs have brought a creditor’s bill to set aside these confessions of judgment upon the ground of fraud, and to reach the property which has been levied upon under the executions issued upon said confessions, being simply creditors at large having no judgment or execution returned unsatisfied.

That such an action cannot be maintained has been the law in this state certainly ever since the case of *McElwain*v. *Willis,*9 Wend., 549. It was recognized in the cases of *Adsit*v. *Butler,*87 N. Y., 585; *Adee*v. *Bigler,*81 id., 349 ; *Carpenter*v. *Osborn,*102 id., 558; 2 N. Y. State Rep., 520, and *Clafiin*v. *Gordon,*39 Hun, 54. The case of *Thurber*v. *Blanck,*50 N. Y., 80, is a direct authority against the claim of the plaintiff.

' The plaintiffs, therefore, are not in a position to maintain this action for equitable relief, and the order continuing the injunction must be reversed, and the motion denied; but in view of the fact that the point was not raised in the court below, or even suggested, and, as far as we have been able to discover, not made upon the brief submitted upon this appeal, the reversal should be without costs.

Daniels, J.

The agree to the reversal of the order from which the appeal has been brought The injunction is not sustained, even by the case of *Bates*v. *Plonsky,*28 Hun, 112, whose chief design was to restrain the execution creditors from taking the proceeds of the sales of the attached property under executions which had been issued on the judgments attacked as fraudulent, until the right to such proceeds could be determined by action.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ArthroCare
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 19, 2009 |  | /s/ David Fitzgerald                 
|                         |  | David Fitzgerald                     
|                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to ArthroCare Corporation and will be retained by ArthroCare Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William DEEL, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6285

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

*296William Deel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinoin.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Deel appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Deel,*Nos. 1:09-cr-00018-JPJ-PMS-1; 1:09-cr-00022-JPJ-PMS-1 (W.D. Va. May 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION '" 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

'1 Mr. David 

### K. Paylor, Director D C. 

## al ' Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 E. Main Street**Ric~ond,** Virginia 23218 Dear Mr. Paylor: On November 1,2010, the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). This SIP - revision consists of a new Chapter 85 (Pennits for Stationary Sources ofPollutants Subject to Regulation), which implements the greenhouse gas pennitting provisions of40 CFR 51.166 as promulgated on June 3, 2010 (75 FR 31514). EPA has detennined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (NPR) action. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them toMr. David Talley, Office ofPennits and Air Toxics, at (215) 814-2117. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely, Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
Willie Terrell JACKSON v. Aimee Cobb SMITH

2160580

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-3343 

SUNG K. KIM, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 

Respondent. 

Kevin L. Owen, Law Offices of Gary M. Gilbert & Associates, of Silver Spring, 

Maryland, argued for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gary M. Gilbert. 

Elizabeth M. Hosford, Senior Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for 

respondent. On the brief were Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, 

Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director. Of counsel on 

the brief was Nolan J. Benson, Jr., Associate General Counsel, Defense Threat 

Reduction Agency, United States Department of Defense, of Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. 

Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-3343 

SUNG K. KIM, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 

 Respondent. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board 

in CASE NO(S). DC0752070892-I-1 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED July 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
IB 

Union Calendar No. 53 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 662 

[Report No. 118–73] 

To amend the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2023 to 

improve disaster relief funding for agricultural producers, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2023 

Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida (for himself and Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

MAY 22, 2023 

Additional sponsors: Mr. DUNN of Florida, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. SOTO, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. WALTZ, Mrs. 

CAMMACK, Mr. GIMENEZ, Ms. LEE of Florida, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. 

MOSKOWITZ, Mr. MILLS, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

MAST, Mrs. CHERFILUS-MCCORMICK, Mrs. LUNA, Mr. BEAN of Florida, 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 

GAETZ, Ms. LOIS FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. VICENTE GONZALEZ of 

Texas, Mr. FROST, Ms. DE LA CRUZ, Mr. VALADAO, and Ms. PEREZ

MAY 22, 2023 

Reported from the Committee on Agriculture; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 662 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropriations 

Act, 2023 to improve disaster relief funding for agricultural producers, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 662 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Block Grant Assistance 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISASTER RELIEF SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIA7 TIONS ACT, 2023 AMENDMENT. 

8 Title I of the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appro9 priations Act, 2023 (division N of Public Law 117–328), 

10 is amended, in the matter under the heading ‘‘OFFICE OF

11 THE SECRETARY’’ under the heading ‘‘PROCESSING, RE12 SEARCH AND MARKETING’’ under the heading ‘‘AGRI13 CULTURAL PROGRAMS’’ under the heading ‘‘DE14 PARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE’’, by inserting ‘‘: Pro15 vided further, That the Secretary of Agriculture may pro16 vide assistance for losses described under this heading in 

17 this Act in the form of block grants to eligible States and 

18 territories’’ before the period at the end. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 53 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 662 

[Report No. 118–73] 

A BILL 

To amend the Disaster Relief Supplemental Appropurposes. funding for agricultural producers, and for other priations Act, 2023 to improve disaster relief 

MAY 22, 2023 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6403 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6403

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to require the disclosure 
         of student medical and counseling records to parents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2023

  Mr. Gaetz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the General Education Provisions Act to require the disclosure 
         of student medical and counseling records to parents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parents' Right to Know Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.

    Section 445 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 
1232h) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``All instructional materials'' and 
                inserting ``(1) All instructional materials''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) All medical or counseling records pertaining to a student 
shall be available for inspection by a parent of such student, upon 
request, unless the inspection of such record by the parent is 
prohibited by a protection order (as defined in section 2266 of title 
18, United States Code).''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(6)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (G) 
                as subparagraphs (E) through (H), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the 
                following:
                    ``(D) Medical or counseling record.--The term 
                `medical or counseling record' means a record that--
                            ``(i) is in the possession of a local 
                        educational agency; and
                            ``(ii) relates to medical care or academic 
                        or mental health counseling provided to a 
                        student.''.

SEC. 3. IMPLEMENTATION.

    Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Education shall issue or modify any rules, 
regulations, policies, or guidance necessary to implement the 
amendments made by section 2.
                                 <all>
```
#### The HILSINGER COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EYEEGO, LLC, Defendant-Appellant Optisource International, Inc., Defendant

2017-1128

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 15, 2017

Craig M. Scott, Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP, Providence, RI, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Christine K. Bush.

Thomas P. McNulty, Lando & Anastasi, LLP, Cambridge, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Eric P. Carnevale; Lori J. Sandman, Sandman *&*Lankford, Daytona Beach, FL.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Bryson and Stoll, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Panolam Industries International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent S. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
March 28, 2008

|/s/VINCENT S. MICELIVincent S. Miceli Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 32
                         SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         In connection with the Report of Net2Phone, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen M.
Greenberg, the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 14, 2004


                                                  /s/  Stephen M. Greenberg
                                                  Stephen M. Greenberg
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Report, I, Arthur Dubroff, the Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 14, 2004



                                                   /s/  Arthur Dubroff
                                                   Arthur Dubroff
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.01





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Andrew
Hidalgo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
WPCS International Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of WPCS International
Incorporated.




By:
            
            /S/ ANDREW
      HIDALGODate:
      July 29, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Andrew
      HidalgoTitle:
            
            Chief Executive Officer




I, Joseph
Heater, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
WPCS International Incorporated on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of WPCS International
Incorporated.




By:
            
            /S/ JOSEPH
      HEATERDate:
      July 29, 2009
            
            Name:
            
            Joseph
      HeaterTitle:
            
            Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10774-10775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XB828]


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Scallop Survey Working Group via 
webinar to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the 
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be 
brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if 
appropriate.

DATES: This webinar will be held on Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 9 a.m. 
Webinar registration URL information https://attendee.gototraining.com/r/5948242878676683522.

[[Page 10775]]


ADDRESSES: Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 
Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    The Scallop Survey Working Group (SSWG) will meet to review 
progress updates to address the Terms of Reference (TORs): Methods and 
analyses identified to address TORs, including timelines for 
completion, and SSWG sub-groups activities. Other business may be 
discussed, as necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency. The public also should be aware that the meeting will be 
recorded. Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is 
available upon request.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. Consistent with 16 
U.S.C. 1852, a copy of the recording is available upon request.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 22, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-04036 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P