### Bill Richardson Governor



## Mayor Richard Greene Regional Administrator 

# State ofNew Mexico office 

# cf the Governor May 2, 2007

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
Dear Mayor Greene:
CJ1 

## On behalfofthe New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), I am pleased to submit

## fir the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the enclosed pair ofamended state rules as support for a request for delegation ofauthority for certain federal National Emission Standardsfor Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards.
On April4, 2007, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board promulgated amendments to the following Parts ofthe New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC):

• 20.2.78 NMAC- Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to incorporate byreference federal requirements promulgated byEPAbetween September 2, 2001 and November 30, 2006}, and

• 20.2.82 NMAC

- Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous Air Pollutants (amended to incorporate byreference federal requirements promulgated by EPA between September 2, 2002 and November 30. 2006).
The hearing record for these amended rules is attached and includes the filed rules, transmittal forms, exhibits, public notices, affidavits ofpublication, and notice ofintent to present technical testimony.
NMED seeks delegation ofauthority from EPA for NESHAP and MACT standards for the time periods indicated above, and in doing so, provides the following statements as per the requirements of40 CFR 63.91(d)(2). EPA approved NMED's program for receiving delegation ofexisting and future Clean Air Act Section 112 standards when it granted final interim approval to our Title V program on November 18, 1994. NMED reaffirms that it still me.ets the criteria

State Capitol • Room 400 • Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 • 505-476-2200 • www.governor.state.nm.us

## for receiving delegation ofSection 112 standards. NMED is seeking delegation ofNESHAP and MACT Standards for both Title V 

## and non-Title V 

## sources. The State ofNew Mexico looks forward to EPA's approval ofthe above-mentioned delegation request. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Bob Spillers ofNMED's Air Quality Bureau at (505) 955-8046.

BR/mw Enclosures
Cc: Tom Diggs, EPA Region 6 Ron Curry, NMED Secretary Sincerely,

Bill Richardson Governor ofNew Mexico

Jim Norton, NMED Environmental Protection Division Director Mary Uhl, NMED Air Quality Bureau Chief

# STATE OF NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD EIB 06-16 (R)



# Revisions to: 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

Letterfrom Governor Richardson to Mayor Greene

### Bill Richardson Governor



### MayorRichard Greene Regional Administrator 

# State ofNewMexico office 

# of tfie §oventor May2, 2007

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733
Dear Mayor Greene:
On behalfofthe NewMexico EnvironmentDepartment (NMED), I ampleased to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the enclosed pair ofamended state rules as support for a request for delegation ofauthority for certain federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards.
On April4, 2007, the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board promulgated amendments to the following Parts ofthe NewMexico Administrative Code (NMAC):



### • 20.2.78 NMAC- Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (amended to

incorporatebyreference federal requirements promulgatedbyEPA between September 2, 2001 and November 30, 2006), and

• 20.2.82 NMAC -MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous AirPollutants (amended to incorporatebyreference federal requirements promulgated byEPAbetween September2, 2002 and November 30. 2006).
Thehearing record for these arriended rules is attached and includes the filed rules, transmittal forms, exhibits, public notices, affidavits ofpublication, and notice ofintent to presenttechnical testimony.
NMED seeks delegation ofauthority from EPA for NESHAP and MACT standards for the time periods indicated above, and in doing so, provides the following statements as per the requirements of40 CFR63.91(d)(2). EPA approved NMED'sprogram for receiving delegation ofexisting and future Clean Air Act Section 112 standards when it granted final interim approval to ourTitle V program on November 18, 1994. NMED reaffirms that it still meets the criteria

State Capitol • Room 400 • SantaFe, New Mexico 87501 • 505-476-2200 • www.governor.state.nm.us

### for receiving delegation ofSection 112 standards. NMED is seeking delegation ofNESHAP and MACT Standards for bothTitle V 

### and non-Title V 

### sources. The State ofNewMexico looks forward to EPA's approval ofthe above-mentioned delegation request. Ifyouhave any questionsregarding this submittal, please contact Bob Spillers ofNMED's Air QualityBureau at (505) 955-8046.

BR/mw Enclosures
Cc: TomDiggs, EPARegion 6 Ron Curry, NMED Secretary Sincerely,

Bill Richardson Governor ofNewMexico

Jim Norton, NMED Environmental ProtectionDivisionDirector MaryUhl, NMED Air QualityBureau Chief

# STATE OFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD EIB 06-16 (R)

Revisions to: 

# 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Transmittal Forms Parts 78 and 82

### . . ..**~** :i :· ,._ . ,:-, ·:**·~·** ..... :.; · · :**!.~~** r:·,**I~** I'-,- 

# NMAC TRANSMITTAL FORM

New 

# D Amendment 

# W Renumber 

# D Repeal 

# D Emergency 

# D

No Yes 

### X Please listattachments andInternetsite{s)if applicable

Name: 

### Gay Dillingham

Title: 

### Chair

# ·~ SRC-2000-02 5/26/2000**~**

# IJilb~cv{ 4/4/07 6/8/07

1. htto:Uwww.epa.gov/fedrqstr/ 

### 2. 

### 3.

Checkif delegated 

### authority 

# D 

# 15'-1 -{)]= Date Signed

# NMAC TRANSMITTAL FORM

New 

# D Amendment 

# [!] Renumber 

# D Repeal 

# D Emergency 

# D

No Yes 

### X Pleaselistattachments andInternetsite(s) ff applicable

Name: 

### Gay Dillingham

Title: Chair

# ~·~ SRC-2000-02 5/26/2000 1. http:jjwww.epa.gov/fedrgstr/ 

### 2.
3. 

### 6/8/07

Checkif delegated 

### authority 

# 0 

# 5-f-

# a+

Date Signed

# STATE OF NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD 

# Effi 06-16 (R)

Revisions to: 

# 20.2.78 NMAC-Emission Standards forHazardousAir Pollutants 

# 20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) Amended Parts 78 and 82

### This is an amendmentto 20.2.78 NMAC, Sections 2 and 9, to be effective June 8, 2007.



### 20.2.78.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants which are subjectto the requirements of 40 CFRPart 61, as amendedthrough [September 1, 2001] November 30.2006. [06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2NMAC- Rn 

### 20NMAC 2.78.101 & 

### A, 06/23/00; 

### A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07] 

### 20.2.78.9 ADOPTION OF40 CFR PART 61: Except as otherwise provided, the national emission standards for hazardous airpollutants as promulgated bythe United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Part 61, as amended in the Federal Registerthrough [September 1. 2001] November 30. 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part [20.2.78 NMAC]. [06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn 

### 20NMAC2.78.107 & 

### A, 06/23/00; 

### A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07]

20.2.78 NMAC

### This is an amendment

### to 20.2.82NMAC, Sections 

### 2 and 

### 8, to be effective June 

### 8, 2007.
20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emittinghazardous 

### air pollutants, which are subjectto the requirements of 

### 40 CFRPart

### 63, as amendedthrough 

### [September 1, 2002]November 

### 30. 2006. 

### [Rn., 20 NMAC 

### 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 

### 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- 

### Rn20 NMAC 

### 2.82.101 & A, 

### 06/23/00; A, 

### 02/18/02; A, 

### 06/13/03; A, 

### 06/08/07]
20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 63: Except 

### as otherwise providedin section 

### 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below), the national emission 

### standards forhazardous airpollutants for source categories 

### as promulgatedbythe US EPA, 

### 40 CFRPart

### 63, as amended in the FederalRegisterthrough 

### [September 1, 2Q02] November

### 30. 2006 are herebyincorporated 

### into thispart

### (20.2.82 NMAC). 

### [Rn., 20 NMAC 

### 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 

### 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- 

### Rn 20 NMAC 

### 2.82.106 & A, 

### 06123/00; A, 

### 02/18/02; A, 

### 06/13/03; A, 

### 06/08/07]

20.2.82 NMAC 

### 1

# STATE OFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD EIB 06-16 (R)



# Revisions to: 20.2.78

# NMAC-Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC) IntegratedParts 78 and 82

### TITLE 20 CHAPTER2 PART78 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) EMISSION STANDARDS FORHAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

20.2.78.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.1 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.100 06/23/00] 20.2.78.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants which are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, as amended through November 30,2006. [06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2 NMAC- Rn 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07] 20.2.78.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: The environmental improvementboard "shall promulgate regulations and standards in

...air quality management" (NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-8.A) and "regulations adopted by the environmental improvementboard

...may...prescribe standards ofperformance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants

..." (NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5.C). [06/16/95; 20.2.78.3 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.102 06/23/00] 20.2.78.4 DURATION: Permanent. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.4 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.103 06/23/00] 20.2.78.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995, except where a later date is cited at the end ofa section or paragraph. [06/16/95, 08/02/96; 20.2.78.5 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.104 06/23/00] [The latest effective date ofany section in this part is June 8, 2007] 20.2.78.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofPart 78 ofChapter 2 is to adopt or establish state authority to implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants in NewMexico subjectto 40 CFR Part 61. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.6 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.105 06/23/00]
20.2.78.7 DEFINITIONS: [RESERVED] [20.2.78.7 NMAC

- N, 06/23/00] 20.2.78.8 AMENDMENT AND SUPERSESSION OFPRIORREGULATIONS: This part amends and supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 751, last filed on AprillO, 1994. All references to AQCR 751 in any other rule shall be understood as a reference to this part. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.8 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.106 06/23/00] 20.2.78.9 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 61: Exceptas otherwise provided, the national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants as promulgated bythe United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Part 61, as amended in the Federal Register through November 30, 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part [20.2.78 NMAC]. [06/l6/95, 08/02/96, 11119/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9NMAC- Rn 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.107 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/08/07]
20.2.78.10 MODIFICATIONSAND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications or exceptions are made to the incorporated federal standards: A. amend 40 CFR Part 61, Section 61.02, Defmitions, as follows: Forthe purposes ofdelegation of authority which the Administrator ofthe United States environmental protection agency may, in his discretion, delegate to the secretary ofthe New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary orhis authorized representative. B. exclude 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts B (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines), H (National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides Other Than Radon from Department ofEnergy Facilities), I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Facilities Licensed bythe NRC and Federal Facilities not covered by Subpart H), K (National Emission Standard for Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants), Q (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions

20.2.78 NMAC

### from Department ofEnergyFacilities), R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks), T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal ofUranium Mill Tailings), and W (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from OperatingMill Tailings). C. the federal emission standards incorporatedbythis regulation shall not be subject to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-8 [Variances] [06/16/95; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.78.108 06/23/00] 

### 20.2.78.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this partmaybe viewed attheNew Mexico environment department, air quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, SantaFe, NM 87502. [06116/95; 20.2.78.11 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.78.109 06/23/00] 

### HISTORY OF20.2.78 NMAC: Pre-NMAC History: Thematerial in this partwas derived from thatpreviously filed with the commission of public records-state records centerand archives. EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 07/24/84. EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 08118/87. EIB/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 07/07/88. EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 04/27/89. EIB/ AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, filed 05/29/90. EIB/AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 04/22/91. EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 04/14/92. EIB/AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Po11utants, filed 04/21/93. EIB/AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 04/12/94. 

### History ofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] 

### Other History: EIB/ AQCR 751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants (filed 04/12/94) was 

### renumbered into frrst version oftheNewMexico Administrative Code as 20NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/16/95. 20NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards ForHazardous Air Pollutants (filed 05/17/95), was 

### renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission StandardsForHazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00.

20.2.78 NMAC 2

### TITLE 20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CHAPTER 2 AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) PART 82 MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROLTECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS

20.2.82.1 ISSUINGAGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.1, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.1 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.100 06/23/00] 20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous airpollutants, which are subjectto the requirements of 40 CFRPart 63, as amended throughNovember 30, 2006. [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- Rn 20NMAC 2.82.101 & 

### A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07] 20.2.82.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: Environmental ImprovementAct, NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8 (A) (4) and (7), and Air Quality Control Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 74-2-1 et seq., including specifically, Section 74-2-5 (A), (B) and (C). Section 74-2-5 (C) provides that "regulations adoptedby the environmental improvement board mayprescribe standards ofperformance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants

..." [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.3 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.102 06/23/00] 20.2.82.4 DURATION: Permanent. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.4, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.103 06/23/00]
20.2.82.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 1994, except where a later date is cited at the end ofa section orparagraph. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.5, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06/23/00] [The latest effective date ofany section in this part is June 8, 2007]
20.2.82.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofthis part is to adopt or establish state authority to implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for the source categories in New Mexico subjectto federal standards. The US EPA requires New Mexico to adopt such standards in orderto implement requirements in Section 112 ofthe Clean AirAct. [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.6, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.6 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.105 06/23/00]
20.2.82.7 DEFINITIONS: [Reserved) [20.2.82.7 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06/23/00]
20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF 40 CFR PART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below), the national emission standards for hazardous airpollutants for source categories as promulgatedby the US EPA, 40 CFRPart 63, as amended in the Federal Register through November 30, 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.82 NMAC). [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.7, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & 

### A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03; A, 06/08/07]
20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECTTO 40 CFR 63.40-63.44 OF SUBPART B (Constructed and Reconstructed Major Sources ofHazardous Air Pollutants): The owner or operator ofa source subjectto these provisions, thatwill be constructing orreconstructing afterJune 29, 1999, shall not construct orreconstruct unless: A. the source has received a maximum achievable control technology (MACT) determination and approval from the department under this part; and B. the MACT determination and approvalhas been incorporated into a permit under 20.2.72 NMAC -Construction Permits or 20.2.70NMAC- Operating Permits. [08/14/98; 20.2.82.9NMAC

- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.108 06/23/00] 20.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications orexceptions are made to the incorporated federal standards:

20.2.82 NMAC

### A. general provisions: Amend 40 CFR Part 63, SubpartA- General Provisions, Section 63.2, Definitions, as follows: Forthe purposes ofdelegation ofauthority which the Administrator ofthe US EPA may, in his orher discretion, delegate tothe secretary ofthe New Mexico environment department, "administrator" means the secretary orhis/her authorized representative. B. 

### variances: The federal emission standards incorporated bythis Part shall not be subjectto NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances). C. 

### constructed and reconstructed major sources: The effective date for incorporation of40 CFR 63.40-63.44 ofSubpart B under 20.2.82.8 NMAC shall be June 29, 1999. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.10 NMAC

- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.109 06/23/00] 20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited 

### in this Part maybe viewed at theNew Mexico environment department, airquality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, NM 87502. [08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.110 06/23/00] HISTORY OF20.2.82 NMAC: Pre-NMAC History: None. History ofRepealed Material: [RESERVED] Other History: 20 NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants, effective ll/27/94. 20NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants (filed 10/28/94) was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants, effective 06/23/00.

20.2.82 NMAC 2

# State ofNew Mexico Environmental ImprovementBoard EIB 06-16(R) Revisions to: 20.2.78 NMAC 

# -EmissionStandards forHazardousAirPollutants 20.2.82 NMAC 

# -MaximumAchievable Control Technologiesfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants 

# Miscellaneous Supporting Documents

# STATE OF NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD EIB 06-16 (R)



# Revisions to: 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

Statement ofReason NMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82

### STATE OF NEW MEXICO BEFORE THEENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT

IN THEMATTEROFPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO: 20.2.78 NMAC- Emissions Standards For Hazardous AirPollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous AirPollutants
NEW MEXICOENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT,
Petitioner. EIB No. 06-16(R)



### ORDERAND STATEMENT OFREASONS FORAMENDMENT OF REGULATIONS
THIS MATTER comesbefore theNew Mexico Environmental hnprovement Board ("Board") upon a petition filed bythe Environmental Protection Division ("Division") ofthe
New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED" or "Petitioner") proposing revisions to Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous AirPollutants in Title 20, Chapter 2,
Parts 78 and 82 NMAC. A public hearing was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico on April 4, 2007, with a quorum ofthe Board present during the hearing. The Board heard technical testimony from Petitioner and admitted exhibits into the record. The Board also received nontechnical testimony and admitted exhibits from Ms. Rebecca Perry-Piper. On April 4, 2007, the
Board deliberated and voted unanimously to adopt the amendments set forth below in relevant part, for the reasons that follow.

## I. AMENDMENTS 1. The proposed adoption of Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants in Title 20, Chapter 2, Parts 78 and 82 NMAC were adopted by the Board at its April4, 2007 meeting. See 

## NMED's Exhibits# 1, 2.
II. STATEMENT OFREASONS 1. NMED filed its Petition for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to Title 20, Chapter 2, Parts 78 and 82 ofthe New Mexico Administrative Code ("NMAC") on December 15, 2006. 2. The Board met at its January 2007 meeting and scheduled a hearing for its April 2007 meeting. 3. Notice ofHearing was published in the Albuquerque Journal on February 9, 2007. 4. Notice ofHearing was published in the New Mexico Register on February 6, 2007. 5. NMED filed a Notice ofIntent to Present Technical Testimonyon March 16, 2007.
6. A hearing was convened in this matter on April4, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
7. Mr. Robert Spillers, Environmental Analyst for the Control Strategies Section ofthe Air Quality Bureau, provided oral and written testimony at the hearing in support of the amendments. See 

## NMED's Exhibits#4. 8. His testimony established the following: (a) the purpose of the proposed revisions to Parts 78 and 82 is to incorporate by 

## reference new rules, corrections, revisions and amendments promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") regarding the federal National Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Statement ofReasons 06-16(R) Page2 

### 2

### ("NESHAP") and Maximum Achievable Control Technology ("MACT") Standards for
Source categories ofHazardous Air Pollutants; (b) 

### EPA has delegated to New Mexico the authority to implement the NESHAP and MACT at affected sources within its jurisdiction; (c) the proposed amendments to Part 78 NESHAP rules were published in
the Federal Register from September 2, 2001 to November 30, 2006; (d) the proposed
amendments to Part 82 MACT rules were published in the Federal Register from September 2, 2002 to November 30, 2006; and (e) the Board's adoption ofthe proposed
revisions serves the sole purpose ofensuring that the NMED has the regulatory authority
to implement the federal requirements pursuant to the delegation from EPA. See


### NMED's Exhibits # 3, 4.
9. His testimony established a section-by-section discussion in Part 78, including but not limited to: (a) New Mexico's exclusion for radionuclides; (b) 

### benzene waste operators; and (c) asbestos. His testimony established a section-by-section discussion in Part 82, including but not limited to: (a) pesticide active ingredient productions; (b) 

### stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines; (d) reinforced plastic composites production; (e) stationary combustion turbines; and (f) 

### national perchloroethylene Air Emissions Standards for Dry Cleaning Facilities. See 

### NMED's Exhibits# 3, 4.
10. Mr. Andy Berger, Manager ofthe Control Strategies Section ofthe Air Quality Bureau, provided oral at the hearing in support ofthe amendments.
11. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8(A)(4) (2000) of the Environmental Improvement Act and NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(B)(l)-(2) (1992) ofthe Air Quality Control Act, the Board has the authority to adopt rules regarding air quality management.

Statement ofReasons 06-16(R) Page 3 

### 3

### 12. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(A), (B) and (C), the Board shall prevent or abate air pollution, and shall adopt rules to attain and maintain ambient air quality
standards and prevent or abate air pollution.
13. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(EX1), the Board determines that the
amendments to Chapter 2 ofTitle 20 ofNMAC would benefit the public 

## in that it would improve air quality and reduce emissions that are harmful to the public. This is applicable to sources locatednearsocio-economicallydisadvantaged communities.
14. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-S(E)(l), the Board found the amendments would protect health and human safety and the consequences of the amendments would be improvement in the air quality of the State. The Board's adoption of new amended
standards will ensure NMED has regulatory authority to implement the federal requirements and allow Air Quality personnel to effectively implement and enforce these
standards to keep New Mexicans healthy.
15. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(E)(2), the Board found no evidence that the
amendments would cause any environmental injustices or any adverse social or cultural impact.
16. Pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(E)(2), (3), the Board's adoption ofthe federal requirements comports with NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5(C)(2) and does not alter the substantive obligations ofaffected sources because affected sources already must comply
with the federal requirements as promulgated through November 30, 2006. 

## See NMED's Exhibits #3,4. 17. TheBoard adopted NMED's proposal without any changes. 

## See NMED's Exhibits #1,2.

Statement ofReasons 06-16(R) Page4 

### 4

### 18. Pursuant to the Small Business Regulatory Relief Act, the rule would have no adverse impact on small businesses because the federal requirements are simply being incorporated into the state rule.
19. In conclusion, NMED had the authority to bring this petition.
20. The Board has the authority to approve this petition.
21. Thepetition satisfies all applicable procedural requirements.
22. The proposed replacement regulations satisfy the statutoryrequirements ofNMSA 1978,
Sections 74-2-5.
23. Theproposed regulations are adopted for anyor all ofthe reasons stated above.



## III. ORDER By a unanimous vote, the petition was approved on April 4, 2007. The proposed regulations

as set forth in Exhibits 

### #1, 2 with any appropriate corrections oftypographical errors, formatting

or other changes necessary to file this rule with the New Mexico State Records Center, are hereby adopted, to be effective 30 days after filing with the State Records Center.

Statement ofReasons 06-16(R) Page 5 

### 5 Dated: 

# 5/'0

# 1=

# STATE OF NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD EIB 06-16 (R)



# Revisions to: 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission Standardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

Notice ofTranscript Filing NMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82

## STATE OFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTALIMPROVEMENT BOARD



# Petition re: Revisions to 20.2.78 and 20.2.82 NMAC

NOTICE OFTRANSCRIPT FILING lr-.:"it f r?' 

# ,,_ fN ''t'-**:~ ·~.,.,-**  

# APR 2007 Received**fnriroi::!i:~m~.:~! lmp.ro~ement** **6~2rd**



## You are hereby notified that the complete transcript ofthe April 4, 2007, hearing in the above case was filed on April19, 2007. The transcript is available for review at the Boards and Commission's Office, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Room N-2150, SantaFe, New Mexico 87505. A copy canbe obtained from Kathy Townsend Court Reporters, 110Twelfth Street, NW Albuquerque, NewMexico 87102, telephone: (505) 243-5018.

# "~

# /.**~~-rn** c.-

# ~ _)0?< '\:\...._. . .

# 0 1 

## o ce e ina, Adrriinistrator 

# U Environmental Improvement Board Post OfficeBox 26110 SantaFe, New Mexico 87502 (505) 827-2425 p 

## (505) 827-2836 F CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE I 

## hereby certifythat a copy ofthe forgoing document was mailed or hand delivered on January 9, 2007, to the following: 

## U.S. Mail Zachary Shandler, Asst. Atty. General Office oftheAttorney General State ofNewMexico P. 

## 0. Box 1508 SantaFe, New Mexico 87504 Hand delivered Bill Grantham New Mexico Environment Dept. Office ofGeneral Counsel Runnels Bldg. N4050 SantaFe, New Mexico 87505

### EIB HEARING, RE· HAPS, 4/4/07

1
2
3 STATE OF NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD

No. EIB 06-16(R)
4 IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO 20.2.78 NMAC- EMISSION STANDARDS FOR 5 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 20.2.82 NMAC- MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL 6 TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS 7
B
9
10
11 12 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 13 14 BE IT REMEMBERED that on the 4th day of April, 15 2007, the above-entitled matter came on for hearing 16 before the New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board, 17 taken at Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting Room A, 18 6900 Gonzales Road, Southwest, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 19 at the hour of 5:15 p.m. 20 21 22 23 24 25

1 A P P E A R A N C E S 2 1 2 I N D E X

3 WITNESSES: 4 ROBERT SPILLERS and ANDY BERGER 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Direct Examination of Robert Spillers by Mr. Grantham Cross Examination by the Board

1 EXHIBITS PAGE

6 16

3 For the Environmental Improvement Board: 2 MARKED/ADMITTED 4 GAY DILLINGHAM, Chair KATHI BEARDEN, Vice Chair 5 DOLORES HERRERA, Secretary GREGORY GREEN 6
7
8
9
10 HAROLD TSO SOREN PETERS ZACH SHANDLER Assistant Attorney General office of the Attorney General Post office Box 1508 Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504
11 For the New Mexico Environment Department: 12
13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BILL GRANTHAM Assistant General Counsel 1190 St. Francis Drive Harold Runnels Building santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 3 NMED: 4 1. Proposed 20.2.78 NMAC

- Emission 5 6 2. 7 8 9 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Proposed 20.2.82 NMAC

- Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants 10 3. List of Federal Register notices 11 4. Direct Testimony of Robert Spillers 12 PERRY-PIPER: 13 1. Letter, January 31, 2007, to Joyce 14 Medina from Rebecca G. "Gert" 15 Perry-Piper, with attachments 16 2. Letter, February 17, 2007, to Joyce 17 Medina from Rebecca G. "Gert" 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Perry-Piper, with attachments



### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018 16

16 16 16

25

25

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

1 MR. GREEN: Let's get started. Let's get 2 started with the hearing. 3 This hearing is now open. This hearing is in 4 EIB 06-16(R) to consider proposed revisions to 20.2.78 5 and 20.2.82. 6 My name is Gregory Green. I'm the EIB Board 7 member who has been designated as Hearing officer in 8 this matter. 9 For the record, the time is now 5:15. We're 10 meeting in Albuquerque. 11 As usual, the hearing procedures are as 12 follows: 13 Testimony will be taken under oath. 14 Optional opening statements. 15 Department witnesses will testify as a panel. 16 Cross-examinations of the Department's 17 witnesses. 18 Department's rebuttal. 19 other parties' witnesses. 20 Public comment. 21 Optional closing statements. 22 I'm not aware of any prehearing issues, so we 23 can begin with the optional opening statements. 24 MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, I have no 1 environmental science and management from New Mexico 2 Highlands university, Las vegas, New Mexico. 3 Q. And are you familiar with the subject matter 4 of this hearing? 5 A. Yes. I have researched and assembled the 6 material to be incorporated for each of the proposed 7 revisions and exhibits and prepared today's testimony. 8 Q. And what is your purpose here today? 9 A. Madam chair, Mr. Hearing officer, and members 10 of the Board, I'm here to present the Department's 11 proposed amendments to the air quality control 12 regulations 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission Standards for 13 Hazardous Air Pollutants, and 20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum 14 Achievable Control Technology

-- Control Technology 15 Standards for source Categories of Hazardous Air 16 Pollutants. 17 From now on, I will refer to these rules as 18 Parts 78 and 82 respectively. 19 The purpose of

-- the proposed revisions to 20 Part 78 are shown in Exhibit NMED 1, and the proposed 21 revisions to Part 82 are shown in Exhibit NMED 2. New 22 material is shown as underlined with deleted material 23 shown as bracketed and strike-out. 24 The purpose of the proposed revisions is to 25 opening statement. I'd like to proceed with examination 25 incorporate by reference new rules, corrections,

1 of the witness. 2 MR. GREEN: Please proceed. 3 ROBERT SPILLERS and ANDY BERGER 4 having been first duly sworn or affirmed, were 5 examined and testified as follows: 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION DF ROBERT SPILLERS 7 BY MR. GRANTHAM: 8 Q. Mr. Spillers, can you please state your name 9 for the record? 10 11 12 A. My name is Robert Spillers, S-P-I-L-L-E-R-S. Q. And where are you employed? A. I'm employed by the New Mexico Environment 13 Department Air Quality Bureau in the Control Strategies 14 Section. 15 Q. And how long have you been in that position, 16 sir? 17 A. I have been with the Centro1 strategies 18 Section since September of 2005. 19 Q. And can you describe the nature of your 20 employment in the Control Strategies Section? 21 A. My duties consist of regulatory revisions, 22 development of regulations for various sources that are 23 currently unregulated and public outreach. 1 revisions and amendments the Environmental Protection 2 Agency, EPA, has made to the federal National Emission 3 Standards for Hazardous Air. Pollutants, NESHAP, and to 4 Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards for 5 source categories of hazardous air pollutants, MACT. 6 The EPA has delegated to New Mexico

-- 7 MR. GREEN: I'm sorry. slow down just a 8 little bit. Some of these are long, technical words to 9 type out. 10 MR. SPILLERS: Okay. I'm sorry. 11 The EPA has delegated to New Mexico the 12 authority to implement the NESHAP and MACT at affected 13 sources within its jurisdiction. 14 The proposed amendments to Parts 78 and 82 are 15 date changes, which can be seen in Exhibit NMED 1 and 16 NMED 2. The proposed date changes will reflect the most 17 recent date that the federal rules have been 18 incorporated into the state rules. 19 The NESHAP Federal Register notices were 20 published from September 2nd, 2001, to November 30th, 21 2006, and the MACT Federal Register notices were 22 published from September 2nd, 2002, to November 30th, 23 2006. 24 Q. And what is your educational background? 24 A list of the Federal Register notices is in 25 A. I have a bachelor's of science degree in 25 Exhibit NMED 3, which is accompanied by a complete set 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

9 1 of the Federal Register notices, which are included on 2 the CD. 3 It is standard procedure to simultaneously 4 revise Part 77, 20.2.77 NMAC, New Source Performance 5 Standards, w1th Parts 78 and 82. However, Part 77 6 proposed revisions will be concurrent with the New 7 Mexico mercury rule. 8 Q. (BY MR. GRANTHAM) What is the Board's 9 authority to adopt new and amended NESHAPs and MACTs 10 into state regulations? 11 A. The Board is authorized by section 74-2-5.C(2) 12 of the New Mexico Air Quality Control Act to adopt 13 performance standards and emission standards for 14 hazardous air pollutants. Such standards shall be no 15 more stringent than but at least as stringent as the 16 federal requirements. 17 The Board's adoption of the federal 18 requirements comports with this statutory limitation and 19 does not alter the substantive obligations of affected 20 sources because affected sources already must comply 21 w1th the federal requirements as promulgated through 22 November 30th, 2006. 23 Q. what is the effect of the Board's adoption of 24 new and amended NESHAPs and MACTs into the regulations? 25 A. The Board's adoption of new and amended NESHAP 10 1 and MACT ensures that the Division has the regulatory 2 authority to implement the federal requirements pursuant 3 to the delegation agreement with EPA. 4 Q. And can you explain why the Board should adopt 5 the proposed revisions to Part 78 and Part 82? 6 A. The Board's adoption of the proposed revisions 7 benefits New Mexico. The EPA delegated to New Mexico 8 the authority to implement the NESHAP on March 15th, 9 1985, and delegated

-- by**delegatin~** to New Mexico the 10 authority to implement the MACT on July 27th, 1995. 11 Under the delegation agreements, the Division 12 must update its regulations regularly to reflect the 13 current federal requirements for NSPS, NESHAP and MACT. 14 Both the EPA and regulated sources prefer that 15 New Mexico implement the NESHAP and MACT. State 16 implementation conserves federal resources, and the 17 federal requirements are more effectively implemented 18 and enforced by the same Air Quality Bureau personnel 19 who review permit applications, issue permits, test and 20 inspect regulated sources in New Mexico. 1 believe, has a question. I assume it's about the 2 acronyms. MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. 11

3 4 MS. HERRERA: I didn't hear you define the 5 acronyms NESHAP and MACT. MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. The NESHAP

-- 6 7 8 9 MS. HERRERA: Thank you, Mr. Hearing Officer. MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. Oh, Mr. Hearing Officer, NESHAP is National 10 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. And 11 the MACT is Maximum Achievable control Technology 12 standards for source categories of hazardous air 13 po11utants. 14 MR. GREEN: I thought they were Bible 15 characters, but go ahead. 16 17 Q. MR. SPILLERS: I'm sorry. (BY MR. GRANTHAM) Mr. Spillers, can you 18 please describe in a little more detail the NESHAP and 19 give some examples of the proposed changes? 20 A. The EIB first adopted the National Emission 21 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, NESHAP, by 22 reference in 1984. The NESHAP are set forth in Title 40 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 61, 40 CFR Part 24 61. 25 The Department is proposing that Part 78 be
12 1 amended to incorporate by reference the federal 2 requirements pertaining to the NESHAP rules promulgated 3 by the EPA from september 2nd, 2001, through 4 November 30th, 2006. 5 This is a periodic incorporation of the 6 federal standards which is part of the Department's 7 delegation authority agreement with the EPA. There are 8 eight changes to the NESHAP during this time period. 9 Many of the NESHAP changes are not substantive. 10 I w1ll review a few examples of the type of 11 changes made to the regulations. A complete list of the 12 changes can be reviewed in Exhibit NMED 3. 13 First, there was only one final rule that was 14 promulgated during this time period. However, this 15 NESHAP is for radionuclides. New Mexico made the 16 decision not to adopt this portion of the NESHAP. 17 subsection lOB of Part 78 presently excludes 18 subparts H and I from incorporation by reference. 19 Therefore, the proposed amendments to the effective 20 dates in Part 78 will not affect these subparts. In 21 Potential disputes regarding NESHAP and MACT 21 other words, Subparts H and I w1ll continue to be 22 are more effectively resolved at the state level, 22 excluded. 23 although the Division routinely consults with the EPA to 23 This can be seen in NMED 3.1. 24 ensure -- ensure consistency with national practice. 24 Second is a partial withdrawal of the direct 25 MR. GREEN: Mr. Spiller, Ms. Herrera, I 25 final rule for benzene waste operations that is due to 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

1 an adverse comment that was received on one of the 2 provisions. 3 This can be seen in NMED 3.3. 13

4 Third is a direct final rule amendment that 5 will amend the citation for labeling containers of 6 asbestos waste material which is based on requirements 7 from the Occupational safety and Health Administration, 8 OSHA. 9 And this is in NMED 3.5. 10 Q. And could you describe the Maximum Achievable 11 Control Technology, MACT, and give some examples of the 12 proposed changes? 13 A. The EIB first adopted Maximum Achievable 14 control Technology standards, MACT, by reference in 15 1994. The standards are set forth in Title 40 of the 16 Code of Federal Regulations Part 63, 40 CFR Part 63. 17 The Department is proposing that the-- that 18 Part 82 be amended to incorporate by reference the 19 federal requirements pertaining to the MACT standards 20 for source categories of hazardous air pollutants 21 promulgated by the EPA from September 2nd, 2002, to 22 November 30th, 2006. 23 This is a periodic incorporation of federal 24 standards which is part of the Department's delegation 25 authority to work with EPA. There are 137 MACT changes
14 1 during this time period. 2 Some example of the changes to the MACT are, 3 first, there are two new rules that apply to the MACT. 4 One is for surface coating of plastic parts and 5 products, and the second is for reinforced plastic 6 composite production. 7 These processes emit hazardous air pollutants 8 that have an adverse health

-- adverse effects on 9 health. These rules will establish emission standards 10 and requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous 11 compliance with the emission limitations. 12 These are in NMED 3.27 and NMED 3.55. 13 Second, in this final rule, EPA is revising 14 its standards to limit emissions of perchloroethylene, 15 1 nor to impose any requirements on such operations by 2 direct final rule. 3 This is NMED 3.75. 4 These are just

-- these are a few examples of 5 the Federal Register notices that have been published 6 during the time period noted. The complete list can be 7 viewed in Exhibit NMED 3. As stated previously, this is 8 a periodic incorporation of federal standards which is 9 part of the Department's delegation authority agreement 10 with the EPA. 11 State implementation conserves federal 12 resources, federal requirements are more effectively 13 implemented, and potential disputes are more effectively 14 resolved at the state level through the adoption of 15 these rules. 16 The Board's adoption of these new and amended 17 NESHAP and MACT standards 1vi 11 ensure that New Mexico -- 18 that the New Mexico Environment Department has 19 regulatory authority to implement the federal 20 requirements and allow air quality personnel to 21 effectively implement and enforce these standards to 22 keep New Mexico healthy and our skies blue. 23 MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, I would 24 like to move that the Board adopt the exhibits as listed 25 in the notice of intent into the record at this point.

1 2 3 4 5 MR. GREEN: Any objections? seeing none, so adopted. 16

(Exhibits NMED 1 through 4 were marked for identification and admitted into evidence.) MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing Officer, I have no 6 further questions of the panel, unless there are any 7 comments the panel would like to make. 8 CROSS EXAMINATION 9 BY THE BOARD: 10 MR. GREEN: Mr. Berger, just because we're on 11 a new hearing, would you state your name for the record? 12 we'll stipulate to your expertise, your 13 position and your education. 14 MR. BERGER: My name is Andy Berger, last name 15 PEC, PEC, from new and existing dry cleaning facilities. 15 is B-E-R-G-E-R. 16 EPA reviewed the standards from 1993

-- from the 1993 16 I have a bachelor of science degree in 17 rule in taking into account new developments in 17 integrated science and technology from James Madison 18 production practices, processes and control technologies 18 university. 19 that are setting more stringent standards. 19 I'm employed as the manager of the control 20 This is in NMED 3.140. 20 Strategies Section at the New Mexico Environment 21 And third is in

-- in this example is an 21 Department's Air Quality Bureau. 22 amendment to the final rule for printing, coating and 22 I did want to, for the Board's clarification, 23 dying of fabrics and other textiles. The purpose of 24 this amendment is to clarify that EPA did not intend to 25 include any synthetic fiber manufacturing operations, 23 again point out that the proposed changes to Parts 78 24 and 82 are similar to those that you heard testimony on 25 on Part 77 in the hearing earlier today on the matter of 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

17 1 EIB 06-15 (R). 2 Again, this is a periodic practice of the 3 Department, to propose to the Board to revise dates 4 within these state rules to incorporate by reference 5 these federal regulations. 6 This enables

-- as Mr. Spillers testified to, 7 this enables the Department to take responsibility and 8 authority for enforcement of these federal standards 9 here in this state. 10 we're also complying with our stringency 1 19 MR. BERGER: I believe the

-- I believe we 2 have some language in our statute that limits our 3 ability to regulate radionuclides from an air quality 4 perspective. 5 MR. TSO: Even

-- Mr. Hearing officer, even 6 though the radiation protection group -- bureau is with 7 that expertise, you can't do this? 8 MR. BERGER: I'm not very familiar with the

-- 9 with the work of the Radiation Control Bureau that's 10 part of the Environment Department. I think the Air 11 language in proposing these date changes within Parts 78 11 Quality Control Act may contain some -- some language 12 and 82. 12 limiting our ability to regulate radionuclides. MR. GRANTHAM: I have no more questions. 13 14 MR. GREEN: And for the Board, I know that we 15 are in a hurry to get out of here and this only looks 16 like a date change, but I do want the Board to 17 understand that by adopting this date change, you are, 18 in effect, adopting very substantial changes that the 19 federal government has made in these regulations, and 20 you're adopting them into New Mexico regulations. 21 Is that correct? 22 23 24 25 MR. BERGER: By reference, yes. MR. GREEN: By reference. MS. HERRERA: what is the choice? MR. GREEN: Do you have a question?

MS. DILLINGHAM: Do we have a choice? 18 1 2 MR. BERGER: You do have a choice. You can 3 elect to not adopt the date changes. In that case, the 4 state Environment Department will be in a position of 5 having delegated authority for some of these standards, 6 some of these NESHAP and MACT standards, some of these 7 NSPS standards that we addressed in the earlier hearing 8 today. 9 But in the case of the NESHAP and MACT 10 standards, if you don't adopt the proposal before you 11 today, the Department would be in the position of not 12 having delegated authority for these

-- these latest 13 federal standards. 14 That

-- in essence, that will mean that the 15 federal EPA will be the responsible agency for 16 enforcement of those standards. 17 MR. GREEN: And I'm comfortable with the ones 18 you left out. 19 Is the Board comfortable with those provisions 20 that were left out? And the reasons why? 21 22 23 MR. TSO: Mr. Hearing Officer. MR. GREEN: Mr. Tso. MR. TSO: I'd just like an explanation on Part 24 78, the section dealing with radionuclides, why that is 25 excluded, just an explanation. 13 MR. TSO: I just need something to hang my hat 14 on here. Why don't we include radionuclides? I mean, 15 why aren't we -- isn't it a part of New Mexico NESHAPs? 16 17 18 MR. BERGER: I

-- MR. STILLERS: Go ahead. MR. BERGER: I believe it depends on that 19 statutory language, that I would regret to say I would 20 have to look at the statute to be absolutely sure about 21 that. 22 MR. TSO: Is the Radiation Control Bureau 2 3 doing this also in addition to its work, NESHAPs, 24 radionuclides? 25 MR. BERGER: I don't believe we'd be able to 20 1 answer that. I don't know. 2 3 MR. SPILLERS: I can't answer that one either. MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing Officer, if the 4 Board does not object, the Department does have other 5 personnel here who might be able to answer that 6 question, that we could call Rita as a witness. 7 8 sworn? 9 10 11 MR. GREEN: Rita, would you stand and be

MS. TRUJILLO: Sure.

(RITA TRUJILLO was duly sworn or affirmed.) MR. GREEN: Rita, can you answer Mr. Tso's 12 questions? 13 14 MS. TRUJILLO: Sure. My name is Rita Trujillo. I'm the Planning 15 and Policy Section Manager for the Air Quality Bureau. 16 We have looked several times at taking a 17 delegation of the radionuclide NESHAPs. However, we 18 really don't have the expertise on staff to do that. 19 we started to develop that expertise several 20 years ago, before I started, and I've been with the 21 Bureau for nine years. We started to --we looked at 22 that, we thought about taking it over, and we actually 23 even trained some people, and then they left after they 24 got trained for much higher paying jobs elsewhere. 25 And so we never -- we never took on that 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07
21 1 responsibility. It's a very highly technical and 2 difficult thing that we just really don't have any 3 in-house expertise. 4 So EPA out of Region 6, out of Dallas, 5 actually --we just didn't take delegation for that, and 6 they are the ones who handle the enforcement of that, of 7 those NESHAPs. 8 9 10 11 12 MR. GREEN: Mr. Tso. MR. TSO: That's fine, Mr. Hearing Officer. Thank you, MS. Trujillo, Mr. Hearing Officer. MR. GREEN: Further questions from the Board? MS. DILLINGHAM: I have a question on the 13 benzene operations, waste operations. 14 Are these changes making it more or less 15 stringent? 16 And I'm asking that partly because I'm aware 17 of the spill that took place up in Espanola from a small 18 dry cleaning operation that created a Superfund site. 19 So it's a serious po11utant. 20 MR. BERGER: Is that

-- I'm sorry. Is that 21 part of NESHAPs or the

-- 22 23 24 25

1 revised? 2 MR. SPILLERS: It's part of NESHAPs. MS. DILLINGHAM: It's Part 78. MR. SPILLERS: If you can give me a minute. MR. BERGER: Is that a new rule, or is that a 22

MR. SPILLERS: I can quote out of the notice 3 itself, if that would be all right. 4 MS. DILLINGHAM: Well, I mean, I would like to 5 assume that it's more stringent because there's a change 6 taking place, but I can't necessarily assume that. So 7 I'd like your professional opinion about whether or not, 8 in fact, it is an improvement or if it's literally a 9 housekeeping

-- it might be a housekeeping matter, but 10 it doesn't say in the summary. 11 (Discussion off the record.) 12 MS. TRUJILLO: If I could, one thing I'd like 13 to make clear is whether or not we -- we have the 14 jurisdiction or the delegation in New Mexico to enforce 15 these requirements. They're still requirements that can 16 be forced

-- in force by EPA, and facilities will be 17 required-- are already required and will continue to be 18 required to comply with these, because they are federal 19 rules that apply to those requirements. 20 This isn't the case like you heard in the 21 previous hearing, where we had some flexibility in how 22 to adopt the requirements for the New Source Performance 23 Standard for mercury. They gave us some flexibility in 24 how to adopt that. 25 These requirements

-- these rules do not have 23 1 those same kinds of flexibility built in, so they will 2 either be enforced by the State of New Mexico, if the 3 Board adopts these date changes, or they will be 4 enforced by federal EPA, in the absence of that 5 adoption. 6 MR. GREEN: And let me make sure I understand 7 your answer one step further. 8 So on benzene, we are not allowed to be more 9 stringent than the federal level. 10 MS. TRUJILLO: we are not allowed to be any 11 more stringent on any of these than the federal 12 requirements. 13 MR. GREEN: Does that answer your question, or 14 do you still want the answer? 15 MS. DILLINGHAM: I understand it's a yes or 16 no, up or down kind of hearing. 17 You know, I was curious to know are we 18 generally weakening or strengthening, and it's okay if 19 we don't have that answer right now. 20 MR. BERGER: I think in regards to the 21 specific NESHAP you asked about, there's

-- Exhibit 3.3 2 2 is the notice about this partia1 withdrawa1 of the fina1 23 rule, national emission standards for benzene waste 24 operations. 25 It looks like from the notice here what they
24 1 did is on November 12th, 2002, publish two proposals for 2 an emission standard for this hazardous air pollutant 3 from this source category. It looks like they

-- EPA 4 received some adverse comments on provisions related to 5 control devices in new -- in the new compliance option 6 for tanks equipped with an enclosure in

-- and then they 7 give a citation of some of the federal rules. 8 They say in this notice that they are 9 withdrawing

-- withdrawing 40 CFR Part 61.343(d), 10 introductory text, and withdrawing and reserving 11 paragraph (e)(ii) that appeared in that earlier NESHAP, 12 which, based on the date, should also be included in

-- 13 in this incorporation by reference. 14 They say in this notice that they will address 15 the adverse comments in subsequent final review based on 16 a parallel proposal published back at the original time. 17 So it looks like they published two proposals for 18 regulating benzene from creating emission standards for 19 benzene waste operations. 20 one of them created some compliance 21 requirements for tanks. They received what amounts to 22 one adverse comment, and so they're withdrawing those 2 3 provisions and wi 11 in a subsequent direct fina1 rule 24 promulgate a parallel final rule. 25 MS. DILLINGHAM: Thank you. 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-50182 3 4 5 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

I don't have any more questions. MS. HERRERA: Thank you, Gay. 25

MR. GREEN: Further questions from the Board? Closing statements? MR. GRANTHAM: Mr. Hearing officer, by way of 6 closing statement, I would simply respectfully request 7 the Board to adopt the proposed changes to 20.2.78 and 8 20.2.82 NMAC for the reasons explained by the witnesses. 9 10 MR. GREEN: counsel have any housekeeping? MR. SHANDLER: one piece of housekeeping. 11 For the record, there's two public 12 documents

-- or public comments documents submitted by 13 Ms. Piper, and I'd ask that you admit those into the 14 record. MR. GREEN: So admitted. 15 16 17 18 (Exhibits Perry-Piper 1 and 2 were marked for identification and admitted into evidence.) MR. GREEN: At this time, I'm going to close 19 the record and turn it over to our Chair. 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. DILLINGHAM: Thank you. (Proceedings adjourned at 5:42 p.m.)

1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 ss. 3 COUNTY OF BERNALILLO 4 5 26

6 I, CHERYL ARREGUIN, the officer before whom the 7 foregoing proceeding was taken, do hereby certify that 8 the witnesses whose testimony appears in the foregoing 9 transcript were duly sworn or affirmed; that I 10 personally recorded the testimony by machine shorthand; 11 that said transcript is a true record of the testimony 12 given by said witnesses; that I am neither attorney nor 13 counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of the 14 parties to the action in which this proceeding is taken, 15 and that I am not a relative or employee of any attorney 16 or counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially 17 interested in the action. 18 19
20
21 NOTARY PUBLIC CCR License Number: 21 Expires: 12/31/07

22 My Commission Expires: 12/12/07 23 24 25 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018

## 0
06-15(R) 111
- 17:1 06-16(R 121- 1:3, 5:4
I 

## 1

1 [6]- 4:4, 4:13, 7:20, 8:15, 16:3, 25:16

10B[1]-12:17 1190 (1]- 2:13 12/12/07[1]- 26:22 12/31/07[1]- 26:20 12th [1]

- 24:1 137[1]- 13:25 1508 (1]- 2:9 15th [1]- 10:8 16[5]- 3:7, 4:5, 4:9, 4:10,4:11

17[1]-4:16 1984[1]-11:22 1985 [1]- 10:9 1993 [2]

- 14:16 1994[1]-13:15 1995 [1]

- 10:10 

## 2
2[5]-4:6, 4:16,7:21, 8:16, 25:16

20.2.77 [1]- 9:4 20.2.78 [5]

- 1:4, 4:4, 5:4, 7:12, 25:7

20.2.82 [5]

- 1:5, 4:6, 5:5, 7:13, 25:8

2001 [2]- 8:20, 12:3 2002 [3]

- 8:22, 13:21' 24:1

2005[1]- 6:18 2006 [5]

- 8:21' 8:23, 9:22, 12:4, 13:22

2007[3]-1:15, 4:13, 4:16

21 [1]- 26:20 25 [2]- 4:15, 4:18 27th [1]- 10:10 2nd [41- 8:20, 8:22, 12:3, 13:21 

## 3
I 3 [4]

_4:10. 8:25. 112:12, 15:7 3.1 [1]

- 12:23 3.140[1]- 14:20 3.27 [1]-14:12 3.3[2]- 13:3, 23:21 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

3.5 [1]- 13:9 8:25 AIR£2]-1:5, 1:6 3.55 [1]- 14:12 account [1]- 14:17 Alamosap]-1:17 3.75 [1]- 15:3 ACHIEVABLE 111- Albuquerque [21

- 30th [5]- 8:20, 8:22, 1:5 1:18,5:10 9:22, 12:4, 13:22 Achievable [6]- 4:7, allow111
- 15:20

31 (1]- 4:13 7:14, 8:4, 11:11' allowed [21

- 23:8, 13:10, 13:13 23:10 

## 4 acronyms121
- 11:2. alter[1]- 9:19 11:5 amend [1]-13:5

Act£2]-9:12, 19:11 amended [61

- 9:9, 4[2]-4:11, 16:3 action 121
- 26:14, 9:24,9:25, 12:1, 40 (5]

- 11 :22, 11 :23, 26:17 13:18, 15:16 13:15, 13:16, 24:9 addition 111- 19:23 amendment£31

-

4th [1]- 1:14 address [1]- 24:14 13:4, 14:22, 14:24 

## 5 addressed [11- 18:7 amendments [4]

- adjourned 111
- 7:11' 8:1' 8:14, 12:19 25:21 amounts 111- 24:21 5:15 [2]- 1:19, 5:9 Administration 111
- Andy[11- 16:14 5:42 [1]

- 25:21 13:7 ANDY121
- 3:4, 6:3 

# I admit111- 25:13 answer[B]- 20:1, 

### I 

## 6 admitted [3]- 16:4, 20:2, 20:5, 20:11'

# ~ 125o15, 25o17 23:7, 23:13, 23:14, adopt[10l- 9:9, 23:19 6 [2]

- 3:6, 21:4 9:12, 10:4, 12:16, appeared [11- 24:11 61 [2]

- 11 :23, 11 :24 I 15:24, 18:3, 18:10, applications 111
- 61.343(d [1]· 24:9 22:22, 22:24, 25:7 10:19 63 [2]

- 13:16 adopted [3]- 11:20, apply[2]- 14:3, 6900 [1]- 1:18 13:13, 16:2 22:19 adopting £31

- 17:17, April 111- 1:14 

## 7 17:18, 17:20 ARREGUIN 111- 26:6 adoption [7]- 9:17, asbestos111
- 13:6 74-2-5.C(2 111- 9:11 9:23, 9:25, 10:6, assembled [1]- 7:5 15:14, 15:16, 23:5 Assistant121
- 2:8, 77 [3]- 9:4, 9:5, adopts 111
- 23:3 2:12 16:25

78[12]-7:18, 7:20, adverse[6]-13:1, assume [3]- 11:1, 8:14,9:5, 10:5, 11:25, 14:8, 24:4, 24:15, 22:5,22:6 112:17, 12:20, 16:23, 24:22 attachments[21

- affect 111- 12:20 4:15, 4:18

### ~17:11, 18::4,

### 21:~-3- affected [3]- 8:12, Attorney121
- 2:8, 9:19, 9:20 2:8

affirmed£31

- 6:4, attorney[2]- 26:12, 20:10, 26:9 26:15

# ~82"'

- 7o18, 

### 1021, agency[1]-18:15 authority[12J- 8:12, :14, 9:5, 10:5, 13:18, Agency 111- 8:2 9:9, 10:2, 10:8, 10:10, 6:24, 17:12 ago[1]

- 20:20 12:7, 13:25, 15:9, 87502 [1]- 2:14 agreement[3]

- 10:3, 15:19, 17:8, 18:5, 87504[1]- 2:10 12:7, 15:9 18:12 agreements[11

- authorized [11- 9:11 

## A 10:11 aware121- 5:22,

-- ahead 121- 11 :15, 21:16 19:17 ability121
- 19:3, Air[13J- 4:5, 4:9, 

## B 19:12 6:13,7:13, 7:15, 8:3,

able 121
- 19:25, 20:5 9:12, 10:18, 11:10, above-entitled 111
- 11:21, 16:21,19:10, B·E·R-G-E-R 111
- 1:15 20:15 16:15

absence111- 23:4 air [9]

- 7:11, 8:5, bachelor[1]- 16:16 absolutely111- 9:14, 11:12, 13:20, bachelor's 111- 6:25 19:20 14:7, 15:20, 19:3, background 111
-

accompanied [11

- 24:2 

### I 6:24 

### i KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018 based [31 -13:6, 24:12, 24:1

Bataan 1115 -2:9 BE£1]-1:14 BEARCE begin(1]- benefits 

### r benzene 

## 1

N111- 2:4 5:23 1]-10:7 [6]- 12:25, •23:23, I 21:13, 23:8



# I I 

### I 24:18,24:1 Berger[2] 16:14

BERGER 6:3, 16:14, 18:2, 19:1, 19:16, 19:1 21:20,21:2

BERNALI 26:3 9

- 16:10, [13]- 3:4, 17:22, 19:8, 8, 19:25, 5, 23:20LL0[1lBible 111- BILL[1]- 11:14 2:12 bit [1]- 8:8 bluep]-1 BOARD125:22 ]- 1:1' 16:9

Board [17]

- 1:16, 6, 7:10, 15:24, 2:3, 3:7, 5: 9:11, 10:4, 17:3, 17:14• 17:16, 18:19, 20:4, 21:11, 25:7 23:3,25:3,

Board'sr 9:17, 9:23,7]- 9:8, 9:25, 10:6, 15:16, 16:22

Box [1]- 2:9 [1]-7:23 bracketed Building[ 2]- 2:9, 2:13

built111- 23:1 Bureau£71
- 6:13, 1, 19:9, 5, 20:21

- 19:6 '9:8, 10:18, 16:2 19:22, 20:1

bureau111 BY[4]- 6:7 11:17, 16:9 f--



# I c

# ---i
case[3]-1 22:20

categorie i

# :;:·_1:~~· i 11:12, 13:20 RIE5[1]- CATEGO 1:6

Categorie s [2]- 4:8, 7:15

category11]- 24:3 6:20 CCR111-2 CD 111-9:2 

## __jCenter[1)-1:17 certify[1J- 26:7 CFR [31

- 11 :23, 13:16,24:9

Chaiq4J- 2:4, 2:4, I 7:9,25:19 

### I 

### i change [3J

- 17:16, I 17:17, 22:5 changes [17]- 8:15, 8:16,11:19,12:8, 12:9,12:11, 12:12, 13:12, 13:25, 14:2, 16:23, 17:11, 17:18, 18:3, 21:14, 23:3, 25:7

characters 111
- 11:15

CHERYL 111
- 26:6 choice(31- 17:24, 18:1, 18:2

citation 121- 13:5, 24:7

clarification 111
- 16:22

. 

### I clarify[1]- 14:24 cleaning 121
- 14:15, 21:18

clear 111- 22:13 close(1J- 25:18 closing 121- 5:21, 25:6 

### I Closing 111- 25:4 coating 121
- 14:4, 14:22

Code 121
- 11 :23, 13:16

comfortable[21

- 18:17, 18:19

comment [31

- 5:20, 13:1' 24:22

comments [4]- 16:7, 24:4, 24:15, 25:12

Commission 111- 126:22 complete [31

- 8:25, 12:11, 15:6

compliance [3J

- 14:11' 24:5, 24:20

comply [21

- 9:20, 22:18

complying 111- 17:10

comports(1J- 9:18 composite 111
- 14:6 concurrent 111- 9:6 conserves [21

- 10:16, 15:11

consider[1J- 5:4 I consist111
- 6:21 consistency 111
- 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

10:24 14:10

consults 111- 10:23 Department1121- contain 111- 19:11 2:11' 5:15, 6:13, containers £11- 13:5 11:25, 13:17, 15:18, continue 121
- 12:21, 17:3, 17:7, 18:4, 22:17 18:11, 19:10,20:4

continuous [1]

- Department's (7]

- 14:10 5:16, 5:18, 7:10, 12:6,

controi[3J -7:11, 13:24, 15:9, 16:21 14:18,24:5 describe[3J

- 6:19,

Control [15]- 4:7, 11:18,13:10 6:13, 6:17, 6:20, 7:14, designated (1J- 5:7 8:4, 9:12, 11:11' detail 111- 11:18 13:11, 13:14, 16:19, develop[1]

- 20:19 19:9, 19:11, 19:22 development 111-

CONTROL 111- 1:5 6:22 correct 111- 17:21 developments 111- corrections 111- 14:17 7:25 devices [1]- 24:5

Counsel 121-2:12, difficult111-21:2 25:9 DILLINGHAM !81

-

counsel 121-26:13, 2:4, 18:1,21:12, 26:16 21:23, 22:4, 23:15,

COUNTY 111- 26:3 24:25, 25:20 created 121-21:18, DIRECT 111- 6:6 24:20 Direct121- 3:5, 4:11

creating 111- 24:18 direct[4J- 12:24, Cross 121- 3:7, 5:16 13:4, 15:2, 24:23 CROSS [1]-16:8 Discussion 111- Cross- 22:11 examinations 111- disputes121
- 10:21, 5:16 15:13

curious [1]- 23:17 Division [3]

- 10:1, current111
- 10:13 10:11, 10:23 documents121
- 

## D 25:12 DOLORES 111- 2:5 down[2]- 8:7, 23:16 Dallas 111- 21 :4 Drive 111- 2:13 date[9J- 8:15, 8:16, dry[2J -14:15,21:18 8:17,17:11,17:16, due111- 12:25 17:17, 18:3,23:3, duly[31- 6:4, 20:10, 24:12 26:9

dates121
- 12:20, during [41

- 12:8, 17:3 12:14, 14:1, 15:6 dealing 111- 18:24 duties 111- 6:21 decision 111- 12:16 dying 111- 14:23 define111
- 11:4 degree[21

- 6:25, 

## E 16:16

delegated [6J - 8:6, 8:11, 10:7, 10:9, 18:5, e)(ii 111- 24:11 18:12 

### I education 111- 16:13

delegating 111- 10:9 educational 111- delegation (BJ- 10:3, i 6:24 10:11' 12:7, 13:24, effect[21

- 9:23, 15:9, 20:17, 21:5, 17:18 22:14 effective[1J -12:19

deleted [11

- 7:22 effectively[51

- 15:13, 15:21 effects [1]-14:8 Examination 121- 3:5,3:7 EIB 161- 1:3, 5:4, 5:6, examination [1J11:20, 13:13, 17:1 5:25

eight111 -12:8 EXAMINATION 121
- either121
- 20:2, 23:2 6:6, 16:8 elect 111
- 18:3 elsewhere 111- 20:24 examinations [1J5:16

examined 111
- 6:5 emission [6J

- 9: 13, example 121
- 14:2, 14:9, 14:11,23:23 14:21 24:2, 24:18 examples [4]

-

EMISSION 111- 1:4 11:19,12:10,13:11, Emission(51

- 4:4, 15:4 7:12, 8:2, 11:1 0, 11:20

emissions 111- 14:14

emit 111- 14:7 excluded [21- 12:22, 18:25

excludes 111- 12:17 Exhibit[7]

- 7:20, 7:21' 8:15, 8:25, employed [51

- 6: 11, 12:12, 15:7,23:21 6:12, 16:19, 26:13 26:16 Exhibits121
- 16:3, 25:16 employee 111- 26:15 exhibits 121
- 7:7, employment111 15:24 6:20 existing 111- 14:15

enables 121
- 17:6, expertise [5J -16:12, 17:7 19:7,20:18,20:19,

enclosure111- 24:6 21:3 enforce121
- 15:21, Expires 121- 26:20, 22:14 26:22

enforced [31

- 10:18, explain [1]-10:4 23:2, 23:4

enforcement[3] 17:8, 18:16,21:6

ensure [3]

- 10:24, 15:17

ensures 111- 10:1 entitled 111- 1:15 Environment[6] 2:11,6:12, 15:18, 16:20, 18:4,19:10

environmental 111
- 7:1

ENVIRONMENT AL [1]- 1:1

Environmental r 3]- 1:16, 2:3, 8:1

EPAr2o]- 8:2, 8:6 8:11' 10:3, 10:7, 10:14, 10:23, 12:3, 12:7, 13:21, 13:25, 14:13, 14:16, 14:24, 15:10, 18:15, 21 :4, 22:16, 23:4, 24:3

equipped 111
- 24:6 Espanola 111- 21: 17 4 explained 111- 25:8 explanation [2]

- 18:23, 18:25 

## F

fabrics [1]- 14:23 facilities 121
- 14:15, 22:16

fact 111
- 22:8 familiar[2]

- 7:3, 19:8

Fe[2J-2:10, 2:14 February[11

- 4:16 federal [271

- 8:2, 8:17, 9:16, 9:17, 9:21, 10:2, 10:13, 10:16, 10:17, 12:1' 12:6, 13:19, 13:23, 15:8, 15:11, 15:12, 15:19, 17:5, 17:8, 17:19, 18:13, 18:15,22:18, 23:4, 23:9, 23:11' 24:7

Federal [8]- 4:10, essence[1J -18:1 establish 111- 14:9 18:19,8:21,8:24,9:1, 

## 2

evidence 121
- 16: demonstrate[11- 10:17,10:22, 15:12, 25:17 4. I 1**~** :23, 13:16, 15:5 

# __l_ .ew[2J -12:10,**15~** 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018fiber[1J

- 14:25 final [10J- 12:13, 12:25, 13:4, 14:13, 14:22, 15:2. 23:22. 24:15, 24:23, 24:24

financially[1J26:16

fine [1J- 21:9 first[4J

- 6:4, 11:20, 13:13, 14:3

First[1J -12:13 flexibility[3J

- 22:21, 22:23,23:1

follows [21

- 5:12, 6:5

FOR [21 - 1:4, 1:6 force [1J- 22:16 forced [11- 22:16 foregoing [2]- 26:7, 26:8

forth [21

- 11 :22, 13:15

Francis[11- 2:13 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

HAROLD [1J- 2:6 Harold[1J- 2:13 hatr11 -19:13 hazardous [6J- 8:5, 9:14, 11:12, 13:20, 14:7,24:2

HAZARDOUS [2J

- 1:5, 1:6

Hazardous [7]- 4:5, 4:9, 7:13, 7:15, 8:3, 11:10,11:21

Health [1J- 13:7 health [2J

- 14:8, 14:9

healthy[1J- 15:22 heaq11- 11:4 heard [2J

- 16:24, 22:20

Hearing [13]- 5:7, 5:24, 7:9, 11:7' 11:9, 15:23, 16:5, 18:21' 19:5, 20:3, 21:9, 21:10,25:5 1:16,2:3 Letter[2J-4:13,4:16 meeting[1]-5:10 IN [1]- 1:4 level [3]- 10:22, member[11- 5:7 in-house[1]- 21:3 15:14, 23:9 members [1]- 7:9 include[2J

- 14:25, License[11- 26:20 Memoriai[1J- 2:9 19:14 limit[1J-14:14 mercury[2]-9:7,

included [2]- 9:1, limitation [1]- 9:18 22:23 24:12 limitationS[1J MEXIC0[2]-1:1,

incorporatet4J- 14:11 26:1 7:25, 12:1, 13:18, limiting[1J -19:12 Mexic0[26J -1:16, 17:4 limits[1J -19:2 1:18,2:10,2:11,2:14,

incorporated (2]- List[1J- 4:10 6:12, 7:1, 7:2, 8:6, 7:6,8:18 list[3J- 8:24, 12:11, 8:11,9:7,9:12, 10:7,

incorporation [5J- 15:6 10:9, 10:15, 10:20, 12:5, 12:18, 13:23, listed[1J -15:24 12:15, 15:17, 15:18, 15:8, 24:13 literally[1J- 22:8 15:22, 16:20, 17:20,

initiai[1J-14:10 lookt1J-19:20 19:15,22:14,23:2 inspect[1J- 10:20 looked 

### r 21
_20:16, might[2]- 20:5, 22:9 integrated [1J- 20:21 minute[11- 21 :24 16:17 lookst4 J-17:15, most[1J-8:16 intend [1]- 14:24 23:25, 24:3, 24:17 move [11- 15:24 intent[1]

- 15:25 MR [59]- 5:1, 5:24, interested [1]- 26:17 

## M 6:2, 6:7, 8:7, 8:10, hearing[11J -1:15, 5:2, 5:3, 5:11' 7:4, f-----------1 16:11,16:25,18:7, 

## G introductory[1]- I ---1 9:8, 10:25, 11:3, 11:6, 24:10 11:8, 11:14, 11:16,

issuet1J -10:19 machine[1J- 26:10 11:17, 15:23, 16:1, issues[1J- 5:22 MACTt19l- 8:5 16:5, 16:10, 16:14, Gay[1J

- 25:2 GAYt1J- 2:4 General [31

- 2:8, 2:8, 2:12

generally[11

- 23:18 Gertr21- 4:14, 4:17 given [1]- 26:12 Gonzales [11- 1:18 government[11- 17:19

GRANTHAM [10]- 2:12, 5:24, 6:7, 9:8, 11:17, 15:23, 16:5, 17:13, 20:3, 25:5

Grantham [1]- 3:6 Green [1J

- 5:6 GREEN [231

- 2:5, 5:1,6:2,8:7, 10:25, 11:14, 16:1, 16:10, 17:14, 17:23, 17:25, 18:17, 18:22, 20:7, 20:11,21:8,21:11, 23:6, 23:13, 25:3, 25:9, 25:15, 25:18

Gregory[1J

- 5:6 GREGORYr11- 2:5 group[11

- 19:6 

## H 22:21,23:16 hereby[1J

- 26:7 hereto[1J- 26:16 Herrera[1J -10:25 HERRERA[5J

- 2:5, 11:4, 11:7, 17:24, 25:2

higher[1J- 20:24 Highlands[1]

- 7:2 highly[1]- 21:1 hour[1J - 1:1 9 house[1]- 21:3 housekeeping [4J

- 22:9. 25:9, 25:10

hurry[1J- 17:15 1Tt1J-1:14 8:12,8:21, 10:1, 17:13, 17:14, 17:22, itself[1J- 22:3 10:10, 10:13, 10:15, 17:23, 17:25, 18:2, ,----------------1 10:21,11:5,11:11, 18:17,18:21,18:22, 13:11, 13:14, 13:19, 18:23, 19:1. 19:5,



### I 

### I 

## J

Jamesr11 -16:17 January[1]- 4:13 jobs[11- 20:24 j Joyce[21- 4:13, 4:16 

### I July[1J- 10:10 

# I jurisdiction [21

-

8:13, 22:14 

### I 

## K -113:25, 14:2, 14:3, 19:8, 19:13,19:16, 115:17, 18:6, 18:9 19:17,19:18, 19:22,



### I MACTs !21

- 9:9, 9:24 19:25, 20:2, 20:3, Madam [1]- 7:9 20:7, 20:11, 21:8, Madison [1J- 16:17 21:9, 21:11, 21:20, 

### I management[1]- 21:22, 21:24, 21 :25,

1 7:1 22:2, 23:6, 23:13, Manager [1J

- 20:15 23:20, 25:3, 25:5, managert1J-16:19 25:9,25:10,25:15, manufacturing [1]- 25:18 14:25

March [11

- 10:8 marked[2J

- 16:3, KATHI !11- 2:4 25:16 keep !11

- 15:22 MARKED/ identification [2]- kind l1l- 23:16 ADMITTED [1]- 4:2 16 4 25 17 kinds [1]- 23:1 MS [15J

- 11:4, 11:7, 17:24, 18:1, 20:9, 20:13,21:12,21:23, 22:4. 22:12, 23:10, 23:15, 24:25, 25:2, 25:20 : , : material[41

- 7:6, implement[7J- 8:12, 1-----------1 7:22, 13:6 10:2,10:8,10:10, 

## L MATTER[1]-1:4 10:15, 15:19, 15:21 matter[5J -1:15,5:8,

implementation [21

- labeling [11 _13:5 7:3, 16:25, 22:9 10:16, 15:11 language [ 41 _17:11 , 

# I Maximum[61

- 4:6, implemented[2J- 19:2, 19:11 , 19:19 7:13,8:4,11:11, 10:17, 15:13 Lasr11

_7:2 13:10, 13:13

impose[1J-15:1 last[11

_16:14 MAXIMUM[1]-1:5 Multi[1J- 1:17 Multi-Service[1J

- 1:17

must[21

- 9:20, 10:12 

## N

improvement[1J- mean [3]- 18:14, name !7J- 5:6, 6:8, latest[1J-18:12 610 1611 1614 f-------------1 22:8 19 14 22 4 : ' : . : ' least[1]-9:15 : ' : 20:14 h IMPROVEMENTt1J- left[31

_18_. 18, Medina[2]-4:14,

andle[1J-21:6 1 :1 4:17 National[3]-8:2, 

## 3

hang[1]-19•13 18:20,20:23 c1·911•20 '---------·

___

# L___'m_p_r_ov---:e----:-m-:-e=n:-:-t--:::[2J----:---=c~:-:-:-~--=-=::-::-:-=--=-=:-:-:-=-==-=.l,--M---=e--=et=-in--:-:g=-[=1J----=-,-1-: 1

__ 7____ · '

__ · _____ _ --- leSS[1]-21:14 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 

### 505-243-5018national 121- 10:24, 23:23

nature 111-6:19 necessarily111- 22:6

need 111- 19:13 NESHAP [241

- 8:3, 8:12,8:19, 9:25, 10:8, 10:13, 10:15, 10:21, 11:5, 11:6, 11:9, 11:18,11:21,11:22, 12:2, 12:8, 12:9, 12:15, 12:16, 15:17, 18:6, 18:9, 23:21, 24:11

NESHAPs[BJ

- 9:9, 9:24, 19:15, 19:23, 20:17,21:7,21:21, 21:22

never121
- 20:25 new1121
- 7:25, 9:9, 9:24, 9:25, 14:3, 14:15, 14:17, 15:16, 16:11, 21:25, 24:5

NEW[2]-1:1,26:1 New [29]- 1:16, 1:18, 2:10,2:11,2:14,6:12, 7:1, 7:2, 7:21, 8:6, 8:11,9:4,9:6,9:12, 10:7, 10:9, 10:15, 10:20, 12:15, 15:17, 15:18, 15:22, 16:20, 17:20,19:15,22:14, 22:22,23:2

nine 111- 20:21 NMAC [BJ- 1:4, 1:5, 4:4, 4:6, 7:12, 7:13, 9:4,25:8

NMED [16J- 4:3, 7:20,7:21,8:15,8:16, 8:25, 12:12, 12:23, 13:3, 13:9, 14:12, 14:20, 15:3, 15:7, 16:3

none 111- 16:2 NOTARY 111-26:19 noted 111
- 15:6 notice [6J- 15:25, 22:2, 23:22, 23:25, 24:8, 24:14

notices [6]

- 4:1 0, 8:19, 8:21, 8:24, 9:1, 15:5

November£61- 8:20, 8:22, 9:22, 12:4, 13:22,24:1

NSPS 121- 10:13, 18:7

Number111
- 26:20 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07



## 0 partial 121
- 12:24, 23:22

parties 121- 26:14, oath(1]-5:13 26:16 object [1]

- 20:4 parties' 111- 5:19 objections [1]- 16:1 partly111- 21:16 obligations 111-9:19 Parts[SJ -7:18,8:14, Occupational 111- 9:5, 16:23, 17:11 13:7 parts 111
- 14:4

OF [7]- 1:1, 1:4, 1:6, paying [1]- 20:24 1:12, 6:6, 26:1, 26:3 PEC[2J-14:15

Office 121
- 2:8, 2:9 people 111- 20:23 Officer(13J- 5:7, perchloroethylene 5:24, 7:9, 11:7, 11:9, (1]- 14:14 15:23, 16:5, 18:21, Performance 121
- 19:5, 20:3, 21:9, 9:4, 22:22 21:10,25:5 performance 111-

officer[1J- 26:6 9:13 one[6J

- 12:13, 13:1, period [4J

- 12:8, 20:2, 22:12, 23:7, 12:14,14:1,15:6 24:22 periodic[4J- 12:5,

One [31- 14:4, 24:20, 13:23, 15:8, 17:2 25:10 permit 111- 10:19

1 ones(2J-18:17, permits(1J- 10:19

21:6 PERRY[1J- 4:12

open 111- 5:3 Perry[3J- 4:15, 4:18, opening[3J

- 5:14, 25:16 5:23,5:25 PERRY-PIPER[1Joperation 111-21:18 4:12 operationsI7J

- Perry-Piper[31

- 12:25, 14:25, 15:1, 4:15, 4:18, 25:16 21 :13, 23:24, 24:19 

### I personally[1Jopinion [1J- 22:7 I 26:10 option [1]- 24:5 personnel [31

- optional 111- 5:23 10:18, 15:20,20:5 Optional 121-5:14, perspective [1]

- 5:21 19:4

original 111-24:16 pertaining 121- 12:2, OSHA[1J- 13:8 13:19 outreach 111- 6:23 PETERS [1]- 2:6

--------- piece 111-25:10 

## p PIPER 111-4:12



### -- Piper[4J- 4:15,4:18, 25:13, 25:16 p.m[2]-1:19, 25:21 place 121-21:17, PAGE 111- 3:2 22:6 panel !3J- 5:15, Planning 111- 20:14 16:6, 16:7 plastic121
- 14:4,

paragraph 111- 14:5 24:11 pointr21- 15:25,

parallel 121
- 24:16, 16:23 24:24 Policy111- 20:15

Part[1BJ- 7:20, 7:21, pollutant121- 21:19, 9:4, 9:5, 10:5, 11:23, 24:2 11:25, 12:17, 12:20, POLLUTANTS [2J

- 13:16, 13:18, 16:25, 1:5, 1:6 18:23, 21:23, 24:9 pollutants[5J

- 8:5,

part [7]

- 12:6, 13:24, 9:14, 11:13, 13:20, 15:9, 19:10, 19:15, 14:7 21:21,21:22 Pollutants !71

- 4:5, 

# . 4:9, 7:13, 7:16, 8:3 11:10, 11:21

portion (1]- 12:1 position [4]- 6:1 6 5,

:13 :21 16:13, 18:4, 18:11

Post111
- 2:9 potential 111- 15 Potentiai[1J-10 practice [21 - 10:24, 17:2 :18
5:22 7 practices 111- 14 prefer[1]- 10:14 prehearing [1]- prepared 111
- 7: present[1]-7:10 presently[1J- 12 previous 111- 22 previously[1] - 1 printing [1]- 14: procedure 111- 9 procedures 111
- :17 :21 5:7 22 :3
5:11

proceed 121
- 5:25, 6:2

proceeding [21- 26:7, 26:14

Proceedings[11 25:21

PROCEEDINGS 1:12 

## - [1]

-
processes 121
- 14:7, 14:18

production 121
- 14:6, 14:18

products 111 - 1 professional [14:5 J - 22:7

promulgate 111
- 24:24

promulgated [4 9:21, 12:2, 12:14 13:21 lproposal 121 - 18:10, 24:16

proposals[21

- 24:1, 24:17 :3

propose [11- 17 PROPOSED [11 Proposed [21 - 4 - 1:4 :4, 4:6 5:4, :20, 9:6, proposed [16]- 7:6, 7:11, 7:19, 7 7:24, 8:14, 8:16, 10:5, 10:6, 11:19 12:19, 13:12. 16:23, 25:7

proposing [31

- 11:25, 13:17, 17

protection (1]- Protection [1]-:11 19:6 8:1 

### KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018 

## 4

provisions[4J

- 13:2, 18:19,24:4,24:23

Public111- 5:20 PUBLIC [1]- 26:19 public [3]

- 6:23, 25:11,25:12

publish 111- 24:1 published [5J

- 8:20, 8:22, 15:5, 24:16, 24:17

purpose (41

- 7:8, 7:19, 7:24, 14:23

pursuant 111- 10:2 

## Q
quality[3J- 7:11, 15:20, 19:3

Quality [6]- 6:13, 9:12,10:18,16:21, 19:11,20:15

1 questions [6]- 16:6, 117:13,20:12,21:11,

25:1,25:3

quote111
- 22:2 

## R I

radiation [1]- 19:6 Radiation 121
- 19:9, 19:22

radionuclide 111- 20:17

radionuclides [6]- 12:15, 18:24, 19:3, 19:12,19:14, 19:24

really 121-20:18, 21:2

reasons [21

- 18:20, 25:8

Rebecca 121
- 4:14, 4:17

rebuttal 111-5:18 received [3]- 13:1, 24:4,24:21

recent[1J- 8:17 record [91

- 5:9, 6:9, 15:25,16:11,22:11, 25:11,25:14,25:19, 26:11

recorded 111-26:10 refer 111- 7:17 reference [10J

- 7:25, 11:22,12:1,12:18, 13:14, 13:18, 17:4, 17:22. 17:23, 24:13

reflect 121- 8:16, 10:12

regarding 111- 10:21regards 111- 23:20 Region [11- 21:4 Register!61

- 4:10, 8:19, 8:21' 8:24, 9:1' 15:5

regretr11- 19:19 regularlY PI- 10:12 regulate 121
- 19:3, 19:12

regulated 121 - 10:14, 10:20

regulating 111
- 24:18

Regulations [2]

- 11:23, 13:16

regulations [9)

- 6:22, 7:12, 9:10, 9:24, 10:12, 12:11, 17:5, 17:19, 17:20

regulatory!31

- 6:21, 10:1, 15:19

reinforced 111- 14:5 related 121
- 24:4, 26:13

relative[11

- 26:15 REMEMBERED 111- 1:14

request 111- 25:6 required [31- 22:17, 22:18

requirements [20]

- 9:16,9:18, 9:21, 10:2, 10:13, 10:17, 12:2, 13:6, 13:19, 14:10, 15:1,15:12,15:20, 22:15, 22:19, 22:22, 22:25, 23:12, 24:21

researched 111- 7:5 reserving 111-24:10 resolved [2]- 10:22, 15:14

resources 121
- 10:16, 15:12

respectfully[11

- 25:6

respectively 111- 7:18

responsibility121
- 17:7,21:1

responsible 111
- 18:15

revieW[3J -10:19, 12:10, 24:15

reviewed [2]- 12:12, 14:16 I revise 121- 9:4, 17:3 I 

### I revised111
- 22:1 I revising 111- 14:13 

### I revisions [10J- 5:4,

II 6:21, 7:7, 7:19, 7:21, 

### EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

7:24, 8:1,9:6, 10:5, similar111
- 16:24 State [31- 10:15, 10:6 simply111
- 25:6 15:11' 23:2

REVISIONS 111- 1:4 simultaneously111
- statement 121
- 5:25, Rita(41

- 20:6, 20:7, 9:3 25:6 20:11' 20:14 site[1J- 21:18 statements[41

-

RITA 111-20:10 skies111
- 15:22 5:14,5:21,5:23,25:4 Road[1]-1:18 Slow[11- 8:7 statute [21

- 19:2, ROBERT[31

- 3:4, small 111-21:17 19:20 6:3, 6:6 SOREN [11

- 2:6 statutory[21- 9:18,

Robert!31

- 3:5, sorry[?]- 8:7, 8:10, 19:19 4:11,6:10 11 :3, 11 :6, 11 :8, step 111- 23:7

Room [1]- 1:17 11:16, 21:20 still 121
- 22:15, 23:14 routinely[11- 10:23 Source[41- 4:8, STILLERS [11- rule[12J- 9:7, 12:13, 7:15, 9:4, 22:22 19:17 12:25, 13:4, 14:13, SOURCE 111- 1:6 stipulate 111- 16:12 14:17, 14:22, 15:2, source [41

- 8:5, Strategies[41

- 6:13, 21 :25, 23:23, 24:23, 11:12, 13:20,24:3 6:17,6:20, 16:20 24:24 sources [61

- 6:22, strengthening 111-

rules 1121- 7:17, 8:13, 9:20, 10:14, 23:18 7:25,8:17,8:18, 12:2, 10:20 strike 111- 7:23 14:3, 14:9, 15:15, Southwest[1)- 1:18 strike-out[1J - 7:23 17:4, 22:19, 22:25, specific 111- 23:21 stringency111- 24:7 spill 111
- 21 :17 17:10

Runnels 111- 2:13 Spiller[1J- 10:25 stringent[7]- 9:15, SPILLERS [12]- 3:4, 14:19,21:15,22:5, 

# s 6:3, 6:6, 8:10, 11 :3, 23:9, 23:11 11:6,11:8,11:16, subject 111- 7:3 S-P-1-L-L-E-R-S 111
- 20:2, 21:22, 21 :24, submitted 111-25:12 6:10 22:2 Subparts 121- 12:18,

Safety111- 13:7 Spillers[6J- 3:5, 12:21 4:11,6:8,6:10, 11:17, subparts 111- 12:20 Santar21- 2:10,2:14 17:6 Subsection 111
- science [41- 6:25, SS(1]- 26:2 12:17 7:1, 16:16, 16:17 St111- 2:13 subsequent (2)

-

Second 121- 12:24, staffpJ- 20:18 24:15,24:23 14:13 stand 111- 20:7 substantial [1]-

second [1]- 14:5 standard 121
- 9:3, 17:18 Secretaryr11- 2:5 24:2 substantive [21

- section [1]- 18:24 Standard [11- 22:23 9:19, 12:9 Section[6J

- 6:14, standards [26]

- 8:4, summary(1J- 22:10 6:18,6:20,9:11, 9:13,9:14, 11:12, Superfund [1]- 16:20, 20:15 12:6, 13:14, 13:15, 21:18

Seeing 111- 16:2 13:19, 13:24, 14:9, surface [11- 14:4 September[5J

- 14:14, 14:16, 14:19, sworn [4]

- 6:4, 20:8, 6:18, 8:20, 8:22, 12:3, 15:8,15:17, 15:21, 20:10,26:9 13:21 17:8, 18:5, 18:6, 18:7, synthetic111- 14:25

serious 111-21:19 18:10, 18:13,18:16, Service[1J- 1:17 23:23,24:18 

## T set(31

- 8:25, 11 :22, Standards[SJ

- 4:5, 13:15 4:8, 7:12, 7:15, 8:3, setting 111- 14:19 9:5, 11:10, 11:21 tanks 121
- 24:6, several 121
- 20:16, STANDARDS 121
- 24:21 20:19 1:4, 1:6 technical 121- 8:8,

shall 111- 9:14 started [5]- 5:1, 5:2, 21:1 SHANDLER 121- 2:7, 20:19,20:20, 20:21 I technologies [1J25:10

1 statecsr- 6:8, 8:18, 14:18

shorthand 111- 9:10, 10:22, 15:14, Technology[7]- 4:7, 26:10 16:11' 17:4, 17:9, 7:14, 8:4, 11:11'

shown !41- 7:20, 18:4 13:11, 13:14 7:21' 7:22, 7:23 STATE!2J -1:1,26:1 technology(1]- 

# I KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018 

## 5

16:17 TECHNOLOGY [11- 1:6

test[11- 10:19 testified 121- 6:5, 17:6

testify 111- 5:15 testimony[5J- 7:7, 16:24, 26:8, 26:10, 26:11

Testimony(2)

- 4:11, 5:13

textr11- 24:10 textiles111
- 14:23 THE 121
- 1:4, 16:9 Therefore [11

- 12:19 third 111- 14:21 Third 111
- 13:4 Title£21

- 11 :22, 13:15 TOp]-1:4 today[41

- 7:8, 16:25,18:8, 18:11

today's£11- 7:7 took 121- 20:25, 21:17

trained 121
- 20:23, 20:24

TRANSCRIPT 111- 1:12

transcript121
- 26:9, 26:11

true [11

- 26:11 TRUJILLO !51

- 20:9, 20:10, 20:13, 22:12, 23:10

Trujillo[2]- 20:14, 21:10

TSO !71

- 2:6, 18:21, 18:23, 19:5, 19:13, 19:22, 21:9 Tso 121- 18:22, 21 :8 Tso's 111-20:11 turn 111-25:19 two [4]- 14:3, 24:1, 24:17,25:11

type 121- 8:9, 12:10 

# f--------------1 u I 

# 1 Under111- 10:11 under111- 5:13 underlined 111
- 7:22 University[21

- 7:2, 16:18

unlesspr- 16:6 unregulated 111- 

### I 6:23

Up[2]- 21:17,23:16update [1]- 10:12 usual 111- 5:11 

# v

various 111- 6:22 Vegas 111
- 7:2 Vice(1]- 2:4 viewed 111- 15:7 

# f

__ 

# w
__

I waste (51

- 12:25,

13:6, 21:13, 23:23, 24:19 

### I weakening [1]- 1 23:18 withdrawal 121
- 12:24, 23:22

withdrawing [41

- 24:9, 24:10, 24:22

witness 121- 6:1, 20:6

WITNESSES 111- 3:3 ' witnesses (6]

- 5:15,

5:17, 5:19, 25:8, 26:8, 26:12

words 121
- 8:8, 12:21 

## y

j I l years 121- 20:20, 

### I 20:21 

### i 

# z

ZACH 111- 2:7 

### I 

# I EIB HEARING, RE: HAPS, 4/4/07

KATHY TOWNSEND COURT REPORTERS 505-243-5018 

## 6

# STATE OFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTBOARD EIB 06-16 (R)

Revisions to: 

# 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission StandardsforHazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants

Notice ofIntentto Present TechnicalTestimonyNMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82

## IN THEMATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO: 20.2.78 NMAC- EMISSIONSTANDARDSFOR

HAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS 

## 20.2.82 NMAC- MAXIMUMACHIEVABLECONTROL

TECHNOLOGYSTANDARDSFORSOURCE CATEGORIES OFHAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS



## ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONDIVISION'S NOTICE OF INTENTTO PRESENTTECHNICAL TESTIMONY
Pursuant to 20.1.1.302.A NMAC, theNewMexico Environment Department 0'-JMED) Environmental Protection Division ("the Division") hereby submits its Notice ofIntent to present technical testimony in this proceeding.

1. 

### Person Represented By

### TheTechnicalWitnesses. The NewMexico Environment Department, Environmental Protection Division.


### 2. NameAnd Qualifications OfEach TechnicalWitness. Robert Spillers. 

## Mr. Spillers is an Environmental Analyst for the Control Strategies Section ofthe Air Quality Bureau. He has worked inthe Air Quality Bureau since September
2005. Mr. Spillers holds a B.S. degree in Environmental Science and Management from New Mexico Highlands University.
Andy Berger. Mr. Bergeris Control Strategies Manager at the Air Quality Bureau. He has worked at the Air Quality Bureau since March 2002. Mr. Berger holds a B.S. degree in Integrated Science and Technology from James Madison University.

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE I

### ,,.


## 3. Summary OfTestimony And Anticipated Length OfTestimony

The witnesses will testify in support ofadoption ofthe revisions for thefollowing

reasons: The proposed revisions incorporate byreference the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAPs) promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) between September2, 2001 andNovember 30, 2006; and Maximum Achievable
Control Technology (MACT) Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous Air Pollutants promulgated by the EPA between September 1, 2002 andNovember 30, 2006. The Division periodically petitions the Environmental ImprovementBoardto update the state's regulations to incorporatethese federal requirements, in order to ensurethatthe Divisionhas the regulatory authority to to implement the most recent requirements. Theproposed revisions include new MACTs and amendmentsto existingNESHA.Ps and MACTs adopted by EPA during the time periods stated above. Mr. 

### Spillers' writtentestimony is submitted as ExhibitNMED4. His oral direct testimony is anticipated to take 30 minutes. 

## Mr. Berger's direct testimony is anticipated to take
10 minutes. 

## 4. Text ofRecommended Modifications to the Proposed Regulatory Change
The Division does not recommend anymodifications to the proposedregulatory changes
submitted inthe Petition ofDecember 14, 2006. (Pleading Log at I).

NOTICE OF INTENT- PAGE 2

## 5. List and Description ofExhibits The Division submits the following exhibits:
EXHIBIT NUMBER TITLE OF EXHIBIT NMED 1 Proposed 20.2.78 NMAC -EmissionStandardsfor HazardousAir Pollutants


## NMED 2 Proposed 20.2.82 NMAC- MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of HazardousAir Pollutants


## NMED 3 List ofFederal Register Notices
NMED 4 Written Testimony ofRobert Spillers
A complete set ofthe federal notices identified in ExhibitNMED 3 is included on CD, is

. available for review at the Air Quality Bureau's Santa Fe office and will be made available for

review at the public hearing.

6. Case 

## Record File.
The case record file in this proceeding is part ofthe administrative record and consists of the following:

• "Petition for Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Regulatory Revisions" filed bythe Division on December 15," 2006.

• Notice ofDocketing, issued December 18,2006.



# • Affidavit ofPublication (NewMexic Register), filed February 6, 2007

.


## • Affidavit ofPublication (Albuquerque Journal), filed February 9, 2007

.


# • Public comment ofR. Perry-Piper, January 29, 2007

NOTICE OFINTENT- PAGE 3

## 7. Reservation ofRights
This Notice ofIntent to Present Technical Testimony is based onthe Division's petition. The Division reserves the rightto call anyperSon to testify and to present any exhibit in response
to another notice ofintent orpublic comment filed in this matter orto any testimony orexhibit offered at the public hearing. The Division also reserves the right to call any person as a rebuttal witness and to present any exhibit in support thereof.

NOTICE OFINTENT- PAGE 4 

### Respectfully submitted,
NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

# ~~~ Bill Grantham Assistant General Counsel NewMexico Environment Department 1190 St. Francis Drive Santa Fe, NewMexico 87502-6110 Telephone (505) 827-2824 Facsimile (505) 827-1628

## EXHIBIT 

# JHMt:D 

# 1

TITLE20 CHAPTER2 PART78 EXHIBITNMED 1

F.NVrn.ONMENT AL PROTECTION AIR 

### QUALITY(STATEWIDE) EMISSION STANDARDS FORHAZARDOUS AIR 

### POLLUTANTS

20.2.78.1 ISSUJNG AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. [06116/95; 20.2.78.1 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.l00 06/23/00]
20.2.78.2 SCOPE: All sources emittinghazardous air pollutants which are**su~ject** 

### to the requirements of40 CFRPart 61, as amended through( September I, 200I] November 30, 2006. (06/16/95, 11/19/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.2 NMAC- Rn 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.101 & 

### A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02;.A. OXIXX/07]


### 20.2.78.3 STATUTORYAUTHORITY: The environmental improvementboard "sha11 promulgate regulations and standards in

...air quality management'' (NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-8.A) and "regulations adopted bythe environmental improvementboard

...may...prescribe standards ofperformance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous airpollutants

..." (NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-5.C). [06/16/95; 20.2.78.3 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.102 06/23/00]
20.2.78.4 DURATION: Permanent. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.4 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.103 06/23/00]
20.2.78.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 16, 1995, except where a later date is cited atthe end ofa section or paragraph. [06/16/95, 08/02/96; 20.2.78.5 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.104 06/23/00] [The latest effective date ofany section 

### in this partis February 18, 2002]
20.2.78.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofPart 78 ofChapter 2 is to adopt orestablish state authority to implement emission standards for hazardous air pollutants in NewMexico subjectto 40 CFR Part 61. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.6 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.105 06/23/00]
20.2.78.7 DEFJNITIONS: [RESERVED] [20.2.78.7 NMAC- N, 06/23/00]
20.2.78.8 AMENDMENT

### AND SUPERSESSION OFPRIORREGULATIONS: This part amends and supersedes Air Quality Control Regulation (AQCR) 75 I, 

### last filed on April 10, 1994. All references to AQCR751 

### inany otherrule shallbe understood as a referenceto this part. [06116/95; 20.2.78.8 NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.106 06/23/00]
20.2.78.9 ADOPTIONOF40 CFRPART 61: 

### Except as otherwise provided, the national emission standards for hazardous airpollutants as promulgated by the United States environmental protection agency, 40 CFR Part 61, as amended in the Federal Registerthrough [September I.

### 200I] 

### November30, 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part (20.2.78 NMAC]. [06/16/95, 08/02/96, 11119/97, 09/08/99; 20.2.78.9 NMAC- Rn 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.107 & 

### A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02;.A. OXIXX/07]



### 20.2.78.10 MODIFICATIONS 

### AND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications orexceptions are made to the incorporated federal standards: A. amend40 CFRPart 61, Section 61.02, Definitions, as follows: Forthe purposes ofdelegation of authority which the Administrator ofthe United States environmental protection agency may, in his discretion,

20.2.78 NMAC February 18, 2002 XXJXX/07

### delegate to the secretary ofthe NewMexico environment department, "administrator"means the secretary orhis authorizedrepresentative. B. exclude 40 CFRPart61, Subparts B (National Emission Standards for RadonEmissions from Underground Uranium Mines), H (National Emission Standards forEmissions ofRadionuclides OtherThanRadon from Department ofEnergy Facilities), 

### I (National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Facilities Licensed bytheNRC andFederal Facilities notcoveredby Subpart

### H), K (NationalEmission Standard for Radionuclide Emissions from ElementalPhosphorus Plants), Q (National Emission Standards for RadonEmissions from DepartmentofEnergy Facilities), R (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks), T (National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from the Disposal ofUraniumMill Tailings), and 

### W (NationalEmission Standards for Radon Emissions from OperatingMill Tailings). 

### C. the federal emission standards incorporated bythis regulation shallnotbe subjectto NMSA 1978, Section 74-2-8 (Variances] [06116/95; 20.2.78.9NMAC- Rn, 

### 20 NMAC 2.78.108 06/23/00] 

### 20.2.78.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited inthis partmaybe viewed atthe New Mexico environment department, airqualitybureau, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, 

### NM 87502. [06/16/95; 20.2.78.11 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.78.109 06/23/00]
IDSTORY OF

### 20.2.78 NMAC: Pre-NMAC History: The material in this partwas derived from thatpreviously filed with the Commission of Public Records-State Records Center andArchives. Effi/AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, 07/24/84. Effi/ AQCR 751, Air QualityControlRegulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, 08/18/87. Effi/ AQCR751, Air Quality ControlRegulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, 07/07/88. Effi/AQCR751, AirQualityControl Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, 04127/89. Effi/AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards For HazardousAirPollutants, 05/29/90. Effi/AQCR751, Air Quality Control Regulation 751 -Emission Standards For HazardousAirPollutants, 04122/91. Effi/ AQCR751, Air QualityControl Regulation 751

- Emission StandardsFor Hazardous AirPollutants, 04/14/92. Effi/AQCR 751,Air Quality Control Regulation 751- Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, 04/21193. EIB/AQCR751,Air Quality ControlRegulation 751 -Emission Standards ForHazardousAirPollutants, 04/12/94. History ofRepealed Material: [RESERVED]
OtherHistory: EIB/AQCR751,Air QualityControl Regulation 751

- Emission Standards ForHazardousAirPollutants, filed 04/12194 was renumbered into first version oftheNewMexico Administrative Codeas 20NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards ForHazardousAirPollutants, filed 05/17/95. 20 NMAC 2.78, Emission Standards ForHazardous AirPollutants, filed 05/17/95, was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replacedby 20.2.78 NMAC, Emission Standards ForHazardousAirPollutants, effective 06/23/00.

20.2.78 NMAC February 18,2002XXJXXJ07 

### 2EXHIBITNMED 2
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIR QUALITY (STATEWIDE) 

## EXHIBIT

TITLE20 CHAPTER2 PART82 MAXIMUMACIDEVABLE CONTROLTECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OFHAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

20.2.82.1 ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board. 

### [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.1, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.1 NMAC- 

### Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.100 06/23/00]
20.2.82.2 SCOPE: All sources emitting hazardous air pollutants, which are subjectto the requirements of 40 CFRPart 63, as amended through [September I, 2902)November 30, 2006. 

### [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.2, 08/14/98; A, 08114/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.2 NMAC- 

### Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.101 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/18/02; A, 06/13/03: A. OXIXX/07]
20.2.82.3 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: Environmental ImprovementAct, NMSA 1978, Section 74-1-8 (A) (4) and (7), andAirQuality Control Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 74-2-1 et seq., including specifically, Section 74-2-5 (A), 

### (B) and (C). Section 74-2-5 (C) provides that "regulations adoptedby the environmental improvement board may prescribe standards ofperformance for sources and emissions standards for hazardous airpollutants

..." 

### [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.3, 08114/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.3 NMAC- 

### Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.102 06/23/00]
20.2.82.4 DURATION: Permanent. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.4, 08/l4/98; 20.2.82.4 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC2.82.103 06/23/00]
20.2.82.5 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 1994, exceptwhere a later date is cited atthe end ofa section or paragraph. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.5, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.5 NMAC- Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.104 06/23/00] [The latest effective date ofany section in this part is June 13, 2003]
20.2.82.6 OBJECTIVE: The objective ofthis part is to adopt or establish state authority to implement emission standards forhazardous airpollutants for the source categories in NewMexico subjectto federal standards. The US EPA requires New Mexico to adopt such standards in orderto implementrequirements in Section 112 ofthe Clean AirAct. 

### [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.6, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.6 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.105 06/23/00]
20.2.82.7 DEFINITIONS: [Reserved] [20.2.82.7 NMAC- 

### Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.107 06/23/00]
20.2.82.8 ADOPTION OF40 CFRPART 63: Except as otherwise provided in section 20.2.82.10 NMAC (below), the national emission standards forhazardous airpollutants for source categories as promulgatedbythe US EPA, 40 CFRPart 63, as amended 

### in the Federal Registerthrough [September I, 2092] November 30. 2006 are hereby incorporated into this part [20.2.82 NMAC]. 

### [Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.7, 08/l4/98; A, 08/14/98, 09/08/99; 20.2.82.8 NMAC- Rn 20 NMAC 2.82.106 & A, 06/23/00; A, 02/l8/02; A, 06/13/03; A, OXIXX/07]
20.2.82.9 SOURCES SUBJECTTO 40 CFR 63.40-63.44OF SUBPART B (Constructed and Reconstructed MajorSources ofHazardous Air Pollutants): The owneroroperator ofa source subject to these provisions, thatwill be constructing or reconstructing afterJune 29, 1999, shall not construct orreconstruct unless: A. the source has received a maximum achievable control technology (MACT) determination and approval from the department underthis part; and B. the MACT determination andapproval has been incorporated into a permit under 20.2.

### 72 NMAC

- Construction Permits or20.2.70 NMAC

- Operating Permits. [08/l4/98; 20.2.82.9 NMAC

- 

### Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82. 108 06/23/00]

20.2.82 NMAC June 13,2003 XX!XX/07

### 20.2.82.10 MODIFICATIONSAND EXCEPTIONS: The following modifications orexceptions are made to the incorporatedfederal standards: A. generalprovisions: Amend40 CFRPart 63, Subpart A- General Provisions, Section 63.2, Definitions, as follows: Forthe pwposes ofdelegationofauthority which the Administrator ofthe US EPAmay, in his orher discretion, delegateto the secretary oftheNewMexico environment department, "administrator''means the secretary orhis/her authorized representative. B. 

### variances: The federal emission standards incorporatedby this Partshall notbe subjectto NMSA 1978, Section74-2-8 (Variances). C. constructed andreconstructedmajorsources: The effective date for incorporation of40 CFR 63.40- 63.44 ofSubpartB under20.2.82.8 NMAC shallbeJune 29, 1999. [Rn, 20 NMAC 2.82.8, 08/14/98; A, 08/14/98; 20.2.82.10 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.109 06/23/00]
20.2.82.11 DOCUMENTS: Documents incorporated and cited in this Partmay be viewed atthe New Mexico environment department, air

### quality bureau, 2044 Galisteo, SantaFe, NM 87502. [08/14/98; 20.2.82.11 NMAC- Rn, 20NMAC 2.82.110 06/23/00]
HISTORY OF 20.2.82 NMAC: Pre-NMACHistory: None. HistoryofRepealed Material: [RESERVED]
OtherHistory: 20NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards ForSource Categories OfHazardous Air Pollutants, filed 10/28/94. 20NMAC 2.82, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For SourceCategories OfHazardous Air 

### Pollutants, filed 10/28/94was renumbered, reformatted, amended and replaced by20.2.82 NMAC, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards For Source Categories OfHazardousAirPollutants, effective 06/23/00.

20.2.82 NMAC Jl!fle 

### 13,2003 XXIXX/07 2

## EXHIBIT

m 

# a IYMeo3 

# Exhibit NMED 3
Update of40 CFRPart 61
Exhibit Date Federal Register Source Catl!Q"ory 3.1* 9/9/01 67 FR 57159 National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides OtherThan Radon From Department ofEnergy Facilities; National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than NuclearRegulatory Commission Licensees andNot Coveredby Subpart H; Final Amendment 3.2* 6/47/04 69 FR33865 National Emission Standards for Emissions ofRadionuclides OtherThan Radon From Department ofEnergy Facilities; National Emission Standards for Radionuclide Emissions From Federal Facilities Other Than NuclearRegulatory Commission Licensees and Not Coveredby Subpart H; Final Amendment-Correction 3.3 2/6/03 68 FR6082 National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations 3.4 12/4/03 68 FR67932 National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations 3.5 9/18/03 68 FR 54790 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos 3.6 7/20/04 69 FR43322 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos 3.7 12/11/03 68 FR 69036 Delegation ofAuthority to New Mexico 3.8 12/9/05 70 FR 73138 Delegation ofAuthorityto AlbuquerqueBernalillo County Air Quality Control Board
*Notincluded in the incorporation byreference. 

## Update of40 CFRPart63
Date FederalRegister SourceCate.,ory 3.9 9/20/02 67 FR59336 Pesticide Active IngredientProduction 3.10 9/24/02 67 FR 59787 SecondaryAluminum Production 3.11 1118/02 67 FR 68038 Secondary Aluminum Production 3.12 12/30/02 67 FR 79808 Secondary Aluminum Production 3.13 9/3/04 69 FR53980 Secondary Aluminum Production 3.14 I0/1/04 69 FR58837 Secondary Aluminum Production 3.15 10/3/05 70 FR57513 SecondaryAluminum Production 3.16 9/20/02 67FR 59433 Bulk Gasoline Terminals and National Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 3.17 9/30/02 67 FR 61380 Bulk Gasoline Terminals and National Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 3.18 8/10/05 70 FR46452 Bulk Gasoline Terminals andNational Emission Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 3.19 12/19/03 68 FR 70960 Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and Pipeline Breakout Stations) 3.20 4/6/06 71 FR 17352 Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals and



### NMED 3- PAGE 1! 

### Pipeline Breakout Stations) 

## I 3.21 10/18/02 67 FR64498 FrictionMaterials Manufacturing Facilities 

### 322 10/21102 67FR64742 Publicly Owned Trea1ment Works 3.23 12/4/02 67 FR72330**P~** 

### and Other Web Coating

1 

### 3.24 12/6/02 67FR72580 Portland CementManufacturing Industry

3.25 7/18/06 71 FR40679 Portland CementManufacturing Industry • 3.26 12/19/02 67 FR77828 Surface Coating ofPlasticParts and Products

3.27 4/19/04 69 FR20968 Surface CoatingofPlasticParts andProducts 3.28 12/19/02 67FR77830 StationaryReciprocating Internal CombustionEngines 3.29 • 6/15/04 69FR33474 StationaryReciprocating Internal CombustionEngines 3.30 6/12/06 71 FR33804 Spark IgnitionInternal CombustionEngines andNational Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants for ReciprocatingInternal Combustion Engines (PR) 3.3 

### I 6126106 71 FR36394 Spark Ignition Internal CombustionEngines andNational Emission Standardsfor Hazardous AirPoJlutants for Reciprocating Internal CombustionEngines 3.32 7127/06 71 FR42622 Stationary SparkIgnition Internal CombustionEngines and National Emission Standards for HazardousAir Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal CombustionEngines 3.33 1/16/03 68 FR2227 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills 3.34 9/8/06 71 FR53272 Municipal Solid Waste Landfills andNational Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (PR) 3.35 2110/03 68 FR6635 Generic MaximumAchievable Control Technology 3.36 5/6/03 68FR23898 Source Categories 3.37 6/2/04 69 FR31008 Source Categories 3.38 711/04 69 FR39862 Source Categories 3.39 6/23/06 71 FR36014 Source Categories 3.40 8/9/06 71 FR45487 Source Categories 3.41 3/12/03 68 FR 11745 Rubber Tire Manufacturing 3.42 3/17/03 68 FR 12590 Surface Coating ofMetal Coil 3.43 4/14/03 68 FR 18062 FlexiblePolyurethaneFoamFabrication Operations 3.44 4/14/03 68 FR 18008 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and BatteryStacks 3.45 4122/06 68 FR 19885 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, andBattery Stacks 3.46 10/13/04 69FR60813

1 

### Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 3.47 1110/05 70FR 1670 Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks 3.48 4115/05 70 FR 19992 CokeOvenBatteries 3.49 812/05 70FR44285 Coke Ovens: Pushing._Quenching, andBatteryStacks 3.50 4/16/03 68 FR 18730 RefractoryProductsManufacturing 3.51 2/13/06 71 FR7415 RefractoryProducts Manufacturing 3.52 4114/06 71 FR 19435 RefractoryProducts Manufacturing 

### 3.53 4/17/03 68 FR 19076 HydrochloricAcidProduction 3.54 4nt06 71 FR 17738 Hydrochloric AcidProdnction 

### 3.55 4/21/03 68 FR 19375 ReinforcedPlastic CompositesProduction 3.56 8/25/05 70 FR50118 ReinforcedPlastic Composites Production 3.57 4129/03 68FR22976 Processing and AsphaltRoofingManufacturing, 3.58 

### 5nt03 68FR24562 Processing andAsphalt RoofingManufacturing 3.59 5/17/05 70FR28360 AsphaltProcessingandAsphalt RoofingManufacturing 3.60 5/8/03 68FR24653 Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources atKraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone SemichemicalPull!_Mills(1} 3.61 7/18/03 68FR42603 Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills 3.62 12/5/03 168FR67953 Chemical RecoveryCombustion Sources atKraft, Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills



## NMED3 PAGE2

### 3.63 5/6/04 69 FR2532l 

# IChemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, 

### Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills 3.64 5/16/03 68 FR26690 Brickand Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and ! 

### National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants for

. Clay Ceramics Manufacturing 

### I 3.65 5/28/03 68 FR31744 Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; and 

### I NationalEmission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants for ! 

### Clay Ceramics Manufacturing(2) 3.66 5120/03 6& FR27646 Integrated Iron and SteelManufacturing I 

### 3.67 

### 7113/060**~**

### FR 39579 Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities 3.68 5/22/03 68 FR27913 SemiconductorManufacturing 3.69 10/19/06 FR61701 Semiconduct()r Manufacturing 3.70 68 FR28606 Surface Coating ofMetal Furniture 3.71 5127/03 68 FR28774 1 

### Engine Test Cells/Stands 3.72 8/28/03 68 FR 51830 Engine Test Cells/Stands 3.73 5/28/03 68FR31746 Coating ofWood BuildingProducts 3.74 5/29/03 68 FR32172 Printing, Coating, and Dyeing ofFabrics and OtherTextile 3.75 8/4/04 69 FR47001 Printing, Coating, and Dyeing ofFabrics and OtherTextiles 3.76 5/30/03 68 FR32586 ! 

### General Provisions; and Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance With CleanAirAct Sections, Sections 1l2(g)and 1120) 3.77 7111/05 70FR39662 Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance With Clean AirAct Sections,
6/23/03

# = Sections 112(g) and 112(j) i 

### 3.78 68 FR37334 Hazardous Air Pollutants Delegations' Provisions 3.79 10/8/03 68 FR58172 Site Remediation 3.80 11129/06 71 FR69011 SiteRemediation 3.81 11/10/03 68 FR63852 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 3.82 7/1/05 70 FR38554 Miscellaneous ()rganic Chemical Manufacturing 3.83 8/30/05 70 FR51269 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 3.84 3/l/06 71 FR 10439 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 3.85 7/14/06 71 FR40316 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing 3.86 11/13/03 68 FR64432 Surface Coating ofMetal Cans 

# rWs 12128/05 70 FR76918 Surface Coating ofMetal Cans 12111/03 68 FR69036 Delegation ofAuthorityto NewMexico

i. 

### 3.89 12/9/05 70 FR73138 Delegation ofAuthority to Albuquerque, Bernalillo CountyAirQuality Control Board i 

### 3.90 1219/05 70 FR73183 Approval ofthe Clean Air Act Section 112(1) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation ofAuthority to the 

### I Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board 3.91 12/19/03 68 FR70904 MercuryEmissions From Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants i 

### 3.92 12/19/03 68 FR 70948 Chlorine and Hydrochloric Acid Emissions From Chlorine 

# I Production • 3.93 

## I 12111103 68FR69164 Miscellaneous CoatingManufacturing

3.94 

## I 12129/03**~8** 

### FR75033 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 3.95 5113/05 0 FR25676 Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing 3.96 7/6/05 70 FR38780 Miscellaneous CoatingManufacturing 3.97 12/21/05 70 FR75924 Miscellaneous CoatingManufacturing 3.98 10/4/06 71 FR58499 Miscellaneous CoatingManufacturing 3.99 112/04 69 FR 130 Surface Coating ofMiscellaneous Metal Parts and Products • 3.100 l/5/04 69 FR394 Lime ManufacturingPlants

3.101 213/04 69 FR 5038 Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline 3.102 7128/06 71 FR42898 Organic Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline) 3.103 3/5/04 69 FR 10512 Stationary Combustion Turbines



## NMED 3- PAGE 3

### 3.104 8/18/04 69 FR51184**Statio~**

### Combustion TurbinesJ:sta_TI 3.105 4/22/04 69 FR21906 Iron and Steel Foundries 3.106 5/20/05 70FR29400 Iron and Steel Foundries 3.107 4/26/04 69 FR22602 Surface Coating ofAutomobiles and Light-Duty Trucks 3.108 7/19/04 69 FR42885 Hard and Decorative ChromiumElectroplating and Chromium Anodizin_g_Tanks 3.109 7/30/04 69 FR45944 Plywood and Composite WoodProducts; Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the TimberProducts Point Source Category; List ofHazardous AirPollutants, Lesser Quanti!Y_Desig!!__ations, Source**Cat~**

### List 3.110 2/16/06 71 FR8342 Plywood and Composite WoodProducts; List ofHazardous AirPollutants, Lesser Quantity Designations, Source CategoryList 3.111 9/1/04 69 FR53338 SolventExtractionfor Vegetable Oil Production 3.112 9113/04 69 FR55218 Industrial, Commercial, and InstitutionalBoilers and Process Heaters 3.113 12/28/05 70 FR 76918 Industrial, Commercial, and InstitutionalBoilers and Process Heaters:Reconsideration 3.114 11129/04 69 FR69320 Petition Process, Lesser QuantityDesignations, Source CategoryList; PetitionToDelist ofEthylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether 3.115 12123/04 69 FR76859 Organic Hazardous AirPollutants Fromthe Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Other Processes Subject to 

### the NegotiatedRegulation for Equipments Leaks 3.116 6/14/06 71 FR34422 Organic Hazardous Air PollutantsFromthe Synthetic Organic ChemicalManufacturing Industry 3.117 2/7/05 70 FR 6355 LeatherFinishing Operations 3.118 2/9/05 70 FR6930 Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and SulfurRecovery Units 3.119 3/29/05 70 FR 15994 Revision ofDecember 2000 RegulatoryFinding on the Emissions ofHazardous 

### AirPollutants From Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and the Removal ofCoal- and OilFiredElectricUtility Steam Generating Units Fromthe Section 112(c) List 3.120 617105 

### 70FR33000 Revision ofDecember2000 Regulatory Finding on the Emissions ofHazardous AirPollutants FromElectricUtility Steam Generating Units and the Removal ofCoal- and OilFiredElectric Utility Steam Generating Units Fromthe Section 112(c) List 3.121 4/13/05 70 FR 19266 Generic MaximumAchievable ControlTechnology Standards; and NationalEmission Standards for Ethylene Manufacturing Process Units: HeatExchange Systems and Waste Operations 3.122 5/13/05 70 FR25666 Pharmaceuticals Production 3.123 6/14/05 70 FR34538 Waste Management System; Testing and Monitoring Activities; Final Rule: Methods Innovation Rule and SW-846 FinalUpdate IIIB 3.124 10/12005 70 FR59402 Final Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste Combustors (PhaseI Final Replacement Standards and Phase_ID 3.125 12/19/02 67 FR77687 Waste Combustors-Corrections 3.126 12/19/05 70FR75042 Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants for Hazardous Waste Combustors 3.127 9/6/06 71 FR52624 Waste Combustors @econsideration)



### NMED 3- PAGE 4

### 3.128 10/25/06 71 FR 62388 Waste Combustors (Amendment)_ 3.129 6/24/05 70 FR 36523 Cellulose Products Manufacturing_ 3.130 8/10/05 70 FR46684 Cellulose Products Manufacturing 3.131 7/14/05 70FR40672 Primary CopperSmelting 3.132 11/2/05 70 FR 66280 PrimaryAluminum Reduction Plants 3.133 12/19/05 70 FR75320 Exemption ofCertain Area Sources From Title V Operating Permit Programs 3.134 12/19/05 70 FR75042 List ofHazardous Air Pollutants, Petition Process, Lesser Quantity Designations, Source CategoryList 3.135 

### 417106 71 FR 17720 Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations 3.136 4/7/06 71 FR 17712 Sterilization Facilities 3.137 

### 417106 71 FR 17729 Industrial Process Cooling Towers 3.138 4/20/06 71 FR20446 GeneralProvisions 3.139 5/24/06 71 FR 29792 Printing and Publishing_Industry 3.140 7/27/06 71 FR42724 National Perchloroethylene AirEmission Standardsfor Dry CleaningFacilities 3.141 9/21/06 71 FR55280 DryCleaning Facilities 3.142 8/17/06 71 FR 4'/670 Halogenated Solvent Cleaning 3.143 10/6/06 71 FR 59302 Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production, Primary Copper Smelting, Secondary Copper Smelting, and Primary Nonferrous Metals--Zinc, Cadmium, and Beryllium 3.144 ll/6/06 71 FR64907 Hospital Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers 3.145 1119/06 71 FR66064 Source Categories: Gasoline Distribution BulkTerminals, BulkPlants, Pipeline Facilities, and Gasoline Dispensing Facilities



## NMED3-PAGE5

## EXHIBITNMED 4 StateofNew Mexico Environmental ImprovementBoard
IN THE MATTER OFPROPOSED REVISIONS TO: EXHIBIT 

# I NME.O 

# Lf

20.2.78 NMAC- 

## EMISSIONSTANDARDSFORHAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS 20.2.82 NMAC-

## MAXIMUMACHIEVEABLE CONTROL TECHNOLGYSTANDARDS FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES OFHAZARDOUSAIRPOLLUTANTS DIRECT TESTIMONY OFROBERT SPILLERS
I. 

## INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

Chair and Members ofthe Environmental ImprovementBoard (Board), I amhere onbehalfof the Environmental Protection Division oftheNewMexico EnvironmentDepartment to present proposed revisions to Parts 78 and 82 ofthe Air Quality Control Regulations. Part 78 is codified as 20.2.78 NMAC- 

### Emission Standards for HazardousAirPollutants. Part 82 is codified as 20.2.82 NMAC 

### -MaximumAchievable Control TechnologyStandards for Source Categories of HazardousAirPollutants. Copies ofthe proposedrevisions will be submitted respectively as ExhibitNMED 1and ExhibitNMED 2. In these exhibits newmaterial is shown as underlined and deleted material shown as bracketed and strike-out. From now on, I will refer to these rules as Parts 78 and 82, respectively.
The purpose ofthe proposed revisions to parts 78 and 82 is to incorporate byreference new rules, corrections, revisions and amendments promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the federal National Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards for Source categories of Hazardous Air Pollutants. The EPA has delegated to NewMexico the authority to implementthe NESHAP and MACT at affected sources within itsjurisdiction. The proposed amendments to part 78 NESHAP rules were publishedinthe Federal Register from September 2, 2001 to November 30, 2006, andpart 82 MACTrules were published inthe FederalRegister from September2, 2002 to November 30,2006.
The Board is authorizedby Section 74-2-5.C(2) oftheNewMexico Air Quality Control Act to adoptperformance standards and emission standards for hazardous airpollutants. Such standards shall be "no more stringentthan but atleast as stringent as" the federal requirements. The Board's adoption ofthe federal requirements comports with this statutory limitation and does not alterthe substantive obligations ofaffected sources because affected sources already must comply withthe federal requirements as promulgatedthroughNovember 30, 2006. As a result, the Board's adoption ofthe proposedrevisions serves the solepurpose ofensuring thatthe Division has the regulatory authority to implementthe federal requirements pursuantto the delegation from EPA.



## SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 1

### The Board's incorporation byreference ofthe proposedrevisions to the NESHAPs and MACT benefitsNewMexico. The EPA delegated to NewMexico the authority to implement the NESHAP onMarch 15, 1985. The EPA delegated toNewMexico the authority to implement the MACTonJuly 27, 1995. Underthe delegation agreements, the Divisionmustupdate its regulations annually to reflectthe current federal requirements forNSPS, MACT, andNESHAP.
Boththe EPAand regulated sources preferthatNewMexico implement the NESHAP, and MACT. Stateimplementation conserves federal resources, and the federal requirements are more effectively implemented and enforced bythe same

## Air QualityBureaupersonnel who reviewpermitapplications, issuepermits, test, and inspectregulated sources inNewMexico. Potential disputes regarding theNESHAP, and MACTare more efficiently resolved atthe state level (although the Divisionroutinely consults with the EPAto ensure consistency withnational practice).



## ll. PART 78 

## REVISION
The EIB first adoptedNational Emission Standards for Hazardous 

## AirPollutants (NESHAP) by reference in 1984. These standards are contained within40 CFRPart 61. The Department is proposingthat Part 78 be amendedto incorporatebyreference the federal requirements pertainingto NESHAPrules promulgated bythe EPA from September2, 2001 through November30, 2006. There are eight changestothe NESHAP duringthis timeperiod. 

### Radionuclides A. 

### There is one final 

### rulethat was promulgatedduring this timeperiod, however, this NESHAP is for radionuclides whichNewMexico made the decisionnot to adopt this portionofthe NESHAPs. TheAmendments were to 40 CFR61 Subparts H 

### & L Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. In 1987, it was decided thatthe State ofNewMexico lackedthe resources to assume Subparts B, 

## H, I, K, and W of40 CFRPart 61 oftheFederal 

## Air Quality Programfor NESHAPs. These subparts are the Radionulides portion oftheregulated Hazardous 

## AirPollutants ofthe Federal Air Program. These subparts continueto be enforced at thefederal leveL Subsection 1O.B of Part 78 presently excludes Subparts H 

### & I from incorporationbyreference. Therefore, today's proposed amendmentto the effective dates in Part 78 will not affectthese Subparts 

### -inother words, Subparts H & 

### I 

### will continueto beexcluded.


### Benzene Waste Operations A. 

### The EPAis making a partial withdrawal ofthedirect final rule for benzene waste operations. ExhibitNMED 3.3. B. 

### TheEPAissued amendments to the national emission standard for benzene waste operations. ExhibitNMED 3.4. 

### Asbestos



## SPILLERSTESTIMONY- PAGE2

### A. 

### The EPA amended the citation for labeling containers ofasbestos waste materials Exhibit NMED3.5 B. 

### The EPA corrected typographical errors in Table 1. 

### ExhibitNMED 3.6. 

### Delegation ofAuthority A. The EPA has delegated authority to the State ofNewMexico for NSPS and MACT. Exhibit NMED3.7.
B. The EPAhas delegated authority to Albuquerque-Bernalillo County for NSPS andNESHAP. ExhibitNMED 3.8



### ill Part 82 Proposed Revisions The EIB first adopted Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards (MACT) by reference in 1994. These Standards are in40 CFRPart 63. The Departmentis proposing that Part 82 be amended to incorporate by reference the federal requirements pertaining to the MACT standards for source categories ofhazardous air

### pollutants, promulgated by the EPA from September2, 2002to November 30,2006. There were 137 changes to the MACT during this time period.
Letme summarize the some ofthe MACT changes that would be incorporated by reference. 

### PesticideActive Ingredient Productions
In this action, EPA takes final action onthose proposed amendments to the rule to address issues raised by petitioners and to correct inconsistencies that have been discovered since EPA originally promulgated the rule. ExhibitNMED 3.9. 

### Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
The EPA adopted the MACT for stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines with a site rating ofmore than 500 brake horsepower. The EPA has identifiedthese as major sources of hazardous airpollutants (HAP) enrissions such as formaldehyde, acrolein, methanol, and acetaldehyde. TheNESHAP will implement section 112(d) ofthe CleanAir Act (CAA) by requiring

## all major sources to meet HAP enrission standards reflecting the application ofthe maximum achievable control technology. ExhibitNMED 3.29. 

### Reinforced Plastic Composites Production
A. The EPA adopted the MACT for new and existing reinforced plastic composites production facilities. This will regulate production and ancillaryprocesses used to manufacture products with thermosetresins and gel coats. Reinforced plastic composites production facilities emit hazardous airpollutants (HAP), such as styrene, methyl methacrylate (MMA), and methylene



### SPILLERS TESTIMONY- PAGE 3

### chloride (dichloromethane). Methylene chloride has been classified as a probable human carcinogen. ExhibitNMED 3.55. 

## B. The direct final amendments revise compliance options for openmolding, correct errors, and add clarificationto sections oftherule. ExhibitNMED 3.56. 

### StationaryCombustion Turbines
A. The EPA adoptedtheMACT for stationary combustionturbines. They have identified stationary combustionturbines as major sources ofhazardous 

### airpollutants emissions. Inthe fmal rule, the EPA

### has divided the stationary combustionturbine category into eight subcategories, including leanpremix gas-fired turbines, leanpremix oil-fired turbines, diffusion flame gas-firedturbines, diffusion flame oil-fired turbines, emergency turbines, turbines with a ratedpeakpower output oflessthan 1.0 megawatt 

### (MW), turbinesburning landfill ordigester gas, andturbines located onthe North Slope ofAlaska The EPA has also adopted a final emission standardrequiring control offormaldehyde emissions for all new orreconstructed stationary combustionturbines inthe four lean premix and diffusion flame subcategories. ExhibitNMED 3.103.
B. The EPA is stayingthe effectiveness oftwo subcategories ofthe final rule for stationary combustionturbines: Leanpremixgas-firedturbines and diffusionflame gas-fired turbines. ExhibitNMED 3.104. 

### National PerchloroethyleneAirEmission Standards forDry CleaningFacilities
A .The EPA ispromulgating revised standards to limit emissions ofperchloroethylene (PCE) from existing and newdry cleaning facilities. The final standards are expected toprovide further reductions ofPCEbeyondthe 1993 national emission standards for hazardous 

### airpollutants (NESHAP), basedonapplication ofequipmentand workpractice standards and, in certain situations, disallowingtheuse ofPCE at dry cleaning facilities. Inaddition, EPA istakingthis opportunityto make sometechnical corrections tothe 1993 Dry CleaningNESHAP. Exhibit NMED3.140. 

## B. The EPA is making a correctionto §63.323(b)(l). Exhibit NMED 3.141.



### SPILLERSTESTIMONY- PAGE 4

# STATE OFNEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENTBOARD EIB 06-16 (R)



# Revisions to: 20.2.78 

# NMAC-Emission StandardsforHazardousAir Pollutants 20.2.82 NMAC- 

# MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standardsfor Source Categories of HazardousAir



# ProofofPublishingNMAC Revisions Parts 78 and 82 in the New Mexico Register and AlbuquerqueJournalNEwMEXICO

. 

# .I

ENVIRONMENTAl IMPROVEMENT BOARD NOTICE OF PUBUC MEETING AND**AULE~~ING** HEARINq

. The

. New Mexico·

### En~iio~~ental lmprQVef1lenl**B~ar~** ("Board") will

. '· hold a**pubf~** hBillJng ·(!II April 3;

2007 at 9:00 a.m. at-the Alamosa /**Mul!l;~er\fice** Cellh!(, Meeting**.Roo~** A,. 6900. Gonzai!!S·**ro~a.** 

### I SW, AlbUfiuerque, ·New MexiCO 87121' :The purpose ollhe.hearing '

. is to consider ·the.\lllatter cif EIB ' :.**~16'{A), pro~sed**  

### reviSions .to· Atr Quality Control, :Regulations 20.2-.75 NMAC:(Errils$ion**Stan~·** dardS lor Haiardous· Air Poilut'· ants) and 20.2.82 NMAC (Maximum .Achievable Control 

### reclmology Staridaids:for Source

.**Categori~** of HaZardous /JJr Pol'**lu~r:** 

## ;. , ':::
.. ·.-.: The propenent 0! thil(**.rewlal~ry** adoption and revision Is the New Mexico Ellvfromrient ·oeP.artnient**('NMED"~** •. '·: • ·. :. : •, NMED

### p~pos~ to

### ~vi~e**~.2.78** NMAC to Incorporate 

### W reference. federal National Emission Stati=' dards for Haiardolis Ai' Pollutants. NMED proposes to revise 202.82 NMAC to- incorporate by.reference federal Maximum Ai:hievabl_e Con-- trol TechnoiO!jY ·Standards ·lor**Sou~ce** Categones.

. · The

## p~n~~~d**i~v~~d regut~iions**  maY,**~(!** during regul!lr bus11 .urs. at the NMEO ·Air**Qual~** 4reau .office· 2044 Gallsleo, :;anta Fe, New'Mexico. Fun text of NMED's proposed revise(! regulations are availabhi on N M**E"D·~.s·w** e·b 1r 1.1 e .at· www.n!flE!nv.state.n!luis; or**~** contacttng**Ro~ert ~Pt!lers**  a\ (505)

. 955:8046 or · ·. ·.' :: , ...**~** ·**robertspUter~~state,n~.us:** .. · 

## STATE OF NEW MEXICO County ofBernalillo SS
Bill Tafoya, being duly sworn, declares and says that he is Classified Advertising Manager of The Albuquerque Journal, and that this newspaper is duly qualified to publish legal notices or advertisements within the meaning of Section 3, 

### Chapter 167, 

### Session Laws of 1937, 

### and that payment therefore has been made of assessed as court cost; that the notice, copy of which is hereto attached, was published in said paper in the regular daily edition, for

# ./**~** :

## ~ti**mes,)** the first publication being on the

## ~ day of

_ __. ....rJ.

_ 

### sequent consecutivepublications on

### --------~~~~--~~-------------------------··20

# __.

before me, a NotaryPublic, in and for the County Bernalillo and State of New Mexico this

## ~ 

# q day of._C-;rl'-"'P-'....qc.L..L.

__

### of200

# .'1, 

# f7**PRICE~** ( 

## :;6

# ~ c 

# @?C( Statement to come at end of month.
ACCOUNT NUMBER 

# C. 

# 8' 0 Cj

# :2i {)
CLA-22-A (R-1193)

The. hearing Will. be conducted in accordimce with 20.1.1· NMAC (AulemakinQ Procedures • Environmental lrrijlrovement ·Board),' the .Environmental lmprovemeRI Act, 8ection.74-1·9 NMSA 1978, thefJJr Quality.Com_rol Aci.Section, 74;2-6 NMSA 1978,**an~** other appliCable**Pll)Cf!du~,** ·•, ' An**~rest~d** persons will be'given reasonable ilppo!'lunity:' af the hearing to, s'ubmij relevant**evi~** dence, data, views and ar_guments, ·orally .or In'writing, 

### wintroduce exhibits, and to examine withess- es. Persons wishing to present technical testimony must file with the.Board

## a written notice of infeR!

. to do so. The notice of intent shall: (1) identify 

### ihe person for ·whom the witness(es) willtestif)i; •. · · (2) .identify each technicill wi)I)ess ihat the person IntendS to. present and state 1he guaflfiCations of.the**wH~eS&.** llicludmg a·description 0! the1r: education and work back# g~~=o~J:~dJ~ nical.witness and stale the**antic~.** paled_duration of the testim_oiiy o_( that witness; · ' :· • · (4) fist and descnbe; or attach, each exhlbH**~ted** Iii be of**fe~~** ·!hat**~~,:~.the ~e,ar­** 

## :~ aitacll

## ·~leX! ill ,aiiy.

## re~om­ mended modifications to the progosed rJ!!W: and**rey~sed** regulaens•..... ·'-·.,:,' '·**Not~es** of**~ient.** lor ihe hearing must· be .received in\he. Office· ol the Board not later than 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007; and should ·reference the docket**numbe~** EIB

.06-:16- (R), and 1he date· .o/ the· hearing. Notices of intentto present**,~lm_icaltestiinony shoul~**  be

.1 submitted to:

. . ·

• • . t**J~ce.** · Medina,**~SrdAdm.**inistratorJ Office of the Envtronmentat

. Improvement Board

...' · · '· · Harold Runnels BUilding •
. 1190 St. Francis Dr.,

. · Room N-2150/2153 · · Santa Fe;NM 87502 • PhOne: (505) 827-2425, Fax (50S) 827-2836

. . . • - >**~** Any

### me~ber of !he

### geri~ral public maY. teS!ffY at the. hearing. No prior notification

.. is required to present :**non:t_e~hn.**1cal**t~stirnQny** at. the**he~ ~**  auc;lpilember,may also·:olfe( exhibits in

. connection. 

### V!ilf:i his.testimony;so long as the exhlbn is not unduly repetitious of the testimony., : ,, · ; ·

# ~~~~~**~o~u~er~rnf~** state_m_ent for the record, .Jn Tteu of provtdmg pral testimony at the hearing, .ShaD file the_'Written statement**prio~**to the hearing, or submftft at

### !hehe¥!1ig.· · .. ·· ·· 

# 1 1

# ~~~~i~roc 

# __**~_· ~~.** **e~1~1~** Judy llei1IJeybv March 19 2007at the

..NMEP,,_'F'erson.nel Servic

__es Bureau, P .u. BoX"26110 1190 St. Francis ·Drive, Santa i=e-, New Mexlco,.•**B750~ ·,t~lephon** e 505-82?-987?, :JD.r**us~rs** please access her number via the New

. Mnlco Relay ·Network a1 1.-800-65!l-8331/. : .:··.
. .. .

## :In~·**~rd.~~{~~** a

## ~~ci~ion·.
, on 1he'froposed}evisiO<t·.regula-

. lions il 

### :tlie i:onehlsion 'Ofthe**.h~aring;**

## 'or 1/Je**~aard** 

### may

## :eon,· -ven_.e a.m
..**e.~!ll'!9**__atter_the _liea_nng to cons1deract1on on the propo!iaf.

### Jou'~uiJanu~rit8,

### 2~~.':: · ···

..**-~··,** ·-··-··-··

# New Mexico Commission ofPublic Records AdministrativeLaw Division 1205 Camino Carlos Rey SantaFe, NM 87507 505-476-7907 

# Affidavit ofPublication in the 

# NewMexico Register I certifythat the agency noted below has published legal notices or rules inthe New Mexico Register, and thatpayment has been assessedbyinvoice for said legal notice orpublication, which appeared on the date and in the volume and issuenumbernotedbelow. Date ofPublication: 113112007 

## Volume: XVII Issue # : 2 Invoice# : NMR-2007- 196 

## Amount: $28.50 

## Description: Notice



# Attest: 

# JL_ /1;

# ?:!;,~ Publisher,

# "f1wMexico

# Re;!er
Administrative Law Division NewMexico CommissionofPublic Records 

## Agency: Em- Air Qual Contact: Robert Spillers 2044 Galisteo Santa Fe, NM 87502-

Notice ofPublic Meeting and Rulemaking Hearing



## Date: 1131/2007



# Notice to Publishing Agency Enclosed are your agency's proofcopies ofthe legal notices orrules which were published in the New Mexico Register. These document the fact thatyourNotice ofRulemaking, Proposed Rule, or Adopted Rule has been published in the New Mexico Register.
Forrn SRC-2002-04

## New Mexico Register 

## IVolume XVIII, Number 2/January 31,2007 25 

# Notices ofRulemaking and Proposed Rules NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND RULEMAKING HEARING
The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a publichearing onApril 3, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting Room A, 6900 Gonzales Road, SW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 8712I. Thepurpose ofthehearingis to considerthe matter ofEIB 06-15 (R)to adopt a new regulation, 20.2.85 NMAC (Mercury Emission Standards and Compliance Schedules for Electric Generating Units), and make related revisions to 20.2.71 NMAC (Operating Permit Emission Fees), 20.2.77 NMAC (New Source Performance Standards), and 20.2.84 NMAC (Acid Rain Permits).
The proponent of this regulatory adoption and revision is the New Mexico Environment Department ("NMED").
NMED proposes to adopt 20.2.85 NMACto create mercury emission limitations and compliance schedules for electric generating units. In doing so, NMED proposes to satisfy obligations pursuant to the federal Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Mercury Rule. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.71 NMAC to incorporate fees for mercury emission limitations. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.

### 77 NMAC to incorporate by .reference federal New Source Performance Standards. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.84 NMACto incorporate definitions added to federal regulations as pa."1 ofthe Clean Air Mercury Rule.
The proposed new and revised regulations may be reviewed during regular business hours at the NMED Air Quality Bureau office, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Full text of NMED's proposed new and revised regulations are available on NMED's web site at www.nmenv.state.nm.us, or by contacting Andy Berger at (505) 955-8034 or andy.berger@state.nm.us.
The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20. Ll NMAC (Rulemaking Procedures

- Environmental Improvement Board), the Environmental Improvement Act Section 74-l-9 NMSA 1978, the Air

## Qu~lity Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978 and other applicable procedures. All interested persons will be given reasonable opportunity at the hearing to submit relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Persons wishingto presenttechnical testimony must file with theBoard 

### awritten notice ofintent to do so. The notice ofintent shall: (I) identifY the person for whom the witness(es) will testify; (2) identifY each technical witness that the person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a description of their education and work background; (3) summarize or include a copy of the direct testimony of each technical witness and state the anticipated duration ofthe testimony ofthat witness; (4) list and describe, or attach, each exhibit anticipated to be offered by that person at the hearing; and (5) attach the text of any recommended modifications to the proposed new and revised regulations.
Notices of intent for the hearing must be received in the Office ofthe Board not 

### later than 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007, and should reference the docket number, EIB 06-15 (R), and the date of the hearing. Notices ofintent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: Joyce Medina, Board Administrator Office of the Environmental Improvement Board Harold Runnels Building 

### 1 I90 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 

### I 2153 Santa Fe, NM 87502 Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827- 2836 Any member ofthe general public may testifY at the hearing. No prior notification is required to present non-technical testimony at the hearing. Any such member may also offer exhibits in connection with his testimony, so long as the exhibit is not unduly repetitious ofthe testimony.
A member ofthe general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the record, in lieu ofproviding oral testimony at the hearing, shall file the written statement prior to the hearing, or submit it at the hearing.
Persons having a disability and needing help in being a part ofthis hearing process should contact Judy Bentley by March 19, 

### 2001 at the NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 2611 0, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TDY users please access her number via the New Mexico Relay Network at 1-800-659-8331.
The Board may make a decision on the proposed new and revised regulations at the conclusion ofthe hearing, or the Board may convene 

### ameeting after the hearing to consider action on the proposal.


## NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD

NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND RULEMAKING HEARING
The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a public hearing on April3, 2007 at 9:00a.m. at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting RoomA, 6900 Gonzalesroad, SW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87121.The purpose ofthe hearing 

### is to consider the matter ofEIB 06-16 (R), proposed revisions to Air Quality Control Regulations 20.2.78 NMAC (Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and 20.2.82 NMAC (MaximumAchievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories of HazardousAir Pollutants).
The proponent of this regulatory adoption and revtsiOn is the New Mexico Environment Department (''NMED").
NMED proposes to revise 20.2.

### 78 NMAC to incorporate by reference federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.82 NMAC to incorporate by reference federal Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories.
The proposed revised regulations may be reviewed during regular business hours at the NMED Air Quality Bureau office, 2044 Galisteo, Santa Fe, New Mexico. Full text of NMED's proposed revised regulations are available on NMED's web site at www.nmenv.state.nm.us, or by contacting Robert Spillers at (505) 955-8046 or robert.spillers@state.nm.us.
The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking Procedures

- Environmental Improvement Board), the Environmental Improvement

### 26 

## New Mexico Register I

## Volume XVIII, Number 2 I 

## January 31, 2007 Act, Section 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, the Air Quality Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978, and other applicable procedures.

Iinterested persons will be given reasonaole opportunity at the hearing to submit relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Persons wishing to present technical testimony must file with the Board awritten notice ofintent to do so. The notice ofintent shall: (1) identify the person for whom the witness(es) will testify; (2) identify each technical witness that the person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a description of their education and work background; (3) summarize or include a copy of the direct testimony of each technical witness and state the anticipated duration ofthe testimony ofthat witness; (4) list and describe, or attach, each exhibit anticipated to be offered by that person at the hearing; and (5) attach the text of any recommended modifications to the proposed new and revised regulations.
"''atices of intent for the hearing must be

ceived in the Office ofthe Board not later

..tan 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007, and should reference the docket number, EIB 06-16 (R), and the date of the hearing. Notices of intent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: Joyce Medina, Board Administrator Office of the Environmental Improvement Board Harold Runnels Building 1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 I 2153 SantaFe, NM 87502 Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827- 2836 Any member ofthe general public may testify at the hearing. No prior notification is required to present non-technical testimony at the hearing. Any such member may also offer exhibits in connection with his testimony, so long as the exhibit is not unduly repetitious ofthe testimony.
A member ofthe general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the record, in lieu ofproviding oral testimony at the hearing, shall file the written statement

·ior to the hearing, or submit it at the hear- 

### _,g.
Persons having a disability and needing help in being a part ofthis hearing process should contact Judy Bentley by March 19, 2007 at the NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 26110, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TOY users please access her number via the New Mexico Relay Network at 1-800-659-8331.
The Board may make a decision on the proposed revised regulations at the conclusion ofthe hearing, or the Board may convene a meeting after the hearing to consider action on the proposal. 

## NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL**I~ROVEMENTBOARD** NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC RULE MAKING HEARING TO CONSIDER REPEAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 20.9.4 NMAC, "SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN" REGULATIONS
The New Mexico Environmental Improvement Board (Board) will hold a public rule making hearing beginning on April 3, 2007 and continuing thereafter as necessary, at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Meeting Room A, 6900 Gonzales Road SW, Albuquerque, NM 87121. The hearing location may change prior to April 3 and those interested in attending should check the EIB website: http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/eib/index.ht ml prior to the hearing. The purpose ofthe hearing is to consider repeal and replacement ofthe Solid Waste Management Plan regulations, 20.9.4 NMAC. The New Mexico Environment Department is the proponent ofthe proposed replacement regulations.
The Solid Waste Management Plan is intended to provide guidance concerning solid waste disposal issues and to assist waste management decision-makers, practitioners and communities. The replacement Plan will affect: waste characterization, waste diversion, siting and capacity ofsolid waste facilities, education, funding for disposal and diversion, and environmentaljustice. The proposed Plan may be reviewed during regular business hours at the office of the Environmental Improvement Board, Harold Runnels Building, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Room N-2153 Santa Fe, NM, 87505. Copies of the proposed Plan may be obtained by contacting Joyce Medina at (505) 827-2425 or by email atjoyce.medina@state.nm.us. Please refer to Docket No. EIB 06-03(R). Written comments may be submitted to the EIB regarding the amended a,nd replaced Plan at the above address and should reference the docket number. The proposed Plan can also be found on the New Mexico Environment Department website at http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us/swb/pd£'SW

. MPbody5.pdf.

Please note formatting and minor technical changes in the proposed Plan may occur. In addition, the Board may make other amendments in response to ·comments submitted to the Board and evidence presented at the hearing.
The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking Procedures) Environmental Improvement Board, the Environmental Improvement Act, NMSA 1978, Section 74-l-9, and other applicable procedures.
All interested persons will be given reasonable opportunity at the hearing to submit relevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Any person who wishes to submit a non-technical written statement for the record in lieu of oral testimony shall file such statement prior to the close ofthe hearing.
Persons wishing to present technical testimony must file with the Board a written notice of intent to do so. The notice of intent shall:

- identify the person or entity for whom the witness(es) will testify;

- identify each technical witness that the person intends to present and state the qualifications of the witness, including a description of their education and work background;

- summarize or include a copy ofthe direct testimony of each technical witness and state the anticipated duration ofthe testimony ofthat witness;

- list and describe, or attach, each exhibit anticipated to be offered by that person at the hearing; and

- attach the text ofany recommended modifications to the proposed changes.
Notices of intent for the hearing must be received in the Office ofthe Environmental Improvement Board not later than 5:00 pm on March 19, 2007, and should reference the Solid Waste Management Plan, the date ofthe hearing, and docket number EIB 06- 03(R). Notices ofintent to present technical testimony should be submitted to: Joyce Medina Office of the Environmental Improvement Board Harold Runnels Building- , - . . -.----- - --- o-- 1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2153 Santa Fe, NM 87502
Ifyou are an individual with a disability and you require assistance or an auxiliary aid, such as a sign language interpreter, to participate in any aspect ofthis process, please contact the Personnel Services Bureau by March 19, 2007. The Personnel Services Bureau can be reached at the New Mexico Environment Department, 1190 St Francis Drive, P.O. Box 26110, Santa Fe, NM 87502, (505) 827-9872. TDD orTDY users may access this number via the New Mexico Relay Network 1-800-659-1779.
The Board may make a decision on the proposed regulatory change at the conclusion ofthe hearing, or the Board may convene a meeting after the hearing to consider action on the proposal. 

## NEW MEXICO HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEDICALASSISTANCE DIVISION
NOTICE
The New Mexico Human Services Department (HSD) will hold a public hearing at I0:00 am., on March 2, 2007, in the HSD Law Library at Pollen Plaza, 2009 S. Pacheco Street, Santa Fe, New Mexico. The subject of the hearing will be State Coverage Insurance (SCI).
New Mexico Human Services Department is proposing regulation updates regarding the following: to clarify that premium payments for State Coverage Insurance (SCI) must be paid in full each month; that no partial payments of premiums or co-payments and no refunds of premiums will be allowed; that in appealing a denial or termination of SCI eligibility through an administrative hearing with the Department, an individual found to be eligible for SCI may enroll with an Managed Care Organization (MCO) but there is no retroactive enrollment or benefit coverage; that a potential SCI member has thirty days to send in the eligibility application and all documentation to the Income Support Division office after receiving the pre-enrollment (contact) letter from the MCO; and to effect various other minor revisions to clarify regulatory language.
Interested persons may submit written comments no later than 5:00 p.m., March 2, 2007, to Pamela S. Hyde, J.D., Secretary, Human Services Department, P.O. Box 2348, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504-2348. All written and oral testimony will be considered prior to issuance ofthe final regulation. Ifyou are a person with a disability and you require this information in an alternative format or require a special accommodation to participate in any HSD public hearing, program or services, please contact the NM Human Services Department toll-free at 1- 888-997-2583, in Santa Fe at 827-3156, or through the department TDD system, 1- 800-609-4833, in Santa Fe call 827-3184. The Department requests at least 1 0 days advance notice to provide requested alternative formats and special accommodations. Copies ofthe Human Services Register are available for review on our Website at www.state.nm.us/hsd/register.html

. or by sending a self-addressed stamped envelope to Medical Assistance Division, Program Oversight & Support Bureau, P.O. Box 2348, Santa Fe, NM. 87504-2348. 

## NE'V MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION INSURANCE DIVISION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE
IN THE MATTER OF AMENDING 13.10.13 NMAC, MANAGED HEALTH CARE RULE
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKINq DOCKETNO. 07-00017-IN

HEARING ANDPROCEDURALORDER
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the New Mexico Superintendent of Insurance ("Superintendent") upon the instruction of the Legislature and the recommendations of Insurance Division Staff("Staff'), proposes to amend 13.1 0.13 NMAC, Managed Health Care Rule. The Superintendent, being otherwise fully advised, FINDS and CONCLUDES THAT:
I. The Managed Health Care Rule includes standards for credentialing and recredentialing, which states that, "At least every two years, MHCPs shall repeat primary verification of its participating providers and facilities to assure ongoing compliance with this section." Paragraph G ofSection 13.10.13.13 NMAC.
2. In 2003 the Legislature found that health care providers licensed in New Mexico are severely burdened by multiple layers of mandatory credentialing obligations, costing**~em,** their patients and thirdparty payers needless expense and wasted time. As a result, state licensure provisions may be contributing to harmful delays and professional shortages in the state. Laws 2003, ch. 235 Paragraph I, effective June 30, 2003; NMSA I978, Section 8-8-9.2, Temporary provisions. Based on these findings, the Legislature required that the Superintendent adopt rules that "shall require primary credential verification no more frequently than every three years and shall be scheduled to coincide with national accrediting organizations and hospital and managed care organizations' credentialing requirements." NMSA 1978, Section 8-8-9.2 (emphasis added). The Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, should be amended to conform to this legislative requirement.
3. On May 3, 2004 the Superintendent promulgated a Grievance Procedures rule. 13.10.17 NMAC. The Grievance Procedures rule applies to al.l health care insurers that are covered under the Managed Health Care Rule. Staff recommends that the Managed Health Care Rule be amended to reflect that the Grievance Procedures rule has superseded the earlier provisions regarding grievances found in the Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC. The Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, should be amended to conform with the subsequent Grievance Procedures rule.
4. The Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, is enforced by the superintendent of the Division of Insurance, Public Regulation Commission ofthe State ofNew Mexico. The Managed Health Care Rule, 13.10.13 NMAC, should be amended to conform to the current designation of "Division" of Insurance within the Public Regulation Commission ofthe State ofNew Mexico.
COPIES OF PROPOSED RULEMAKINGAREAVAILABLE: a. by downloading from the Public Regulation Commission's website, www.nmprc.state.nm.us, under "Insurance Division," then "News" and "Proposed Rules, 13.10.13 NMAC, Managed Health Care Rule;" b. by sending a written request with the docket number, rule names, and rule numbers to the Public Regulation Commission's Docketing Office, P.O. Box 1269, SantaFe, NM 87504-1269 along with a self-addressed envelope and a check for $37.00 made payable to the Public Regulation Commission to cover the cost of

## NEWMEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND RULEMAKING HEARING TheNew Mexico Environmental Improvement Board ("Board") will hold a publichearing on April3, 2007 at 9:00a.m. at the Alamosa Multi-Service Center, MeetingRoom A, 6900 Gonzales road, SW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87121. The purpose ofthe hearing is to consider the matter ofEIB 06-16 (R) proposedrevisions to 

## Air Quality Control Regulations 20.2.78 NMAC (Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) and 20.2.82NMAC (Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous 

## AirPollutants). The proponent ofthis regulatory adoption and revision is the NewMexico Environment Department ("NMED").
NMED proposes torevise 20.2.78 NMACto incorporate byreference federal National Emission Standards for Hazardous AirPollutants. NMED proposes to revise 20.2.82 NMACto incorporate byreference federal Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards for Source Categories ofHazardous AirPollutants. The proposed revised regulations may be reviewed during regular business hours at the NMED AirQuality Bureau office, 2044 Galisteo, SantaFe, NewMexico. A full text ofNMED's revised regulations are available onNMED's web site at www.nmenv.state.nm.us, orby contacting Robert Spillers at (505) 955-8046 orrobert.spillers@state.nm.us.
The hearing will be conducted in accordance with 20.1.1 NMAC (Rulemaking Procedures

- Environmental Improvement Board), the Environmental ImprovementAct, Section 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, the Air Quality Control Act Section, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978, and other applicable procedures.
All interestedpersons will be given reasonable opportunity atthe hearingto submitrelevant evidence, data, views and arguments, orally or in writing, to introduce exhibits, and to examine witnesses. Persons wishing to present technical testimony mustfile withthe Board a written notice ofintentto do so. The notice ofintent shall: (1) identify the person for whom the witness(es) will testify; (2) identify eachtechnical witness thatthe person intends to presentand state the qualifications ofthe witness, including a description oftheir education and work background; (3) summarize orinclude a copy ofthe directtestimony ofeachtechnical witness and state the anticipated duration ofthe testimony ofthat witness; (4) list and describe, or attach, eachexhibitanticipatedto be offered by thatperson atthe hearing; and (5) attachthe text ofany recommended modifications to the proposed new and revised regulations.
Notices ofintent for the hearing mustbe received inthe Office ofthe Board not laterthan 5:00 pmonMarch 19, 2007, and shouldreference the docket number, EIB 06-16 (R), 

## and the date of the hearing. Notices ofintent to presenttechnical testimony should be submittedto:

## Joyce Medina, BoardAdministrator Office ofthe Environmental ImprovementBoard Harold Runnels Building 1190 St. Francis 

## Dr., RoomN-2150 

## I 2153 SantaFe, NM 87502 Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-2836 Any memberofthe general public may testify atthe hearing. No prior notification is required to presentnon-technical testimony atthe hearing. Any suchmembermay also offer exhibits in connectionwithhis testimony, so long as the exhibit is notunduly repetitious ofthe testimony.
A memberofthe general public who wishes to submit a written statement for the record, in lieu ofproviding oral testimony atthe hearing, shall file the written statementpriorto the hearing, or submitit atthe hearing.
Persons having a disability and needing help inbeing apart ofthis hearing process should contactJudyBentleyby March 19, 2007 atthe NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 26110, 1190 St. Francis Drive, SantaFe, NewMexico, 87502, telephone 505-827-9872. TDY usersplease access her numberviathe NewMexico RelayNetwork at 1-800-659-8331.
The Boardmay make a decision onthe proposed newandrevised regulations atthe conclusion ofthe hearing, orthe Boardmayconvene a meeting afterthe hearing to consider action onthe proposal.

## STATE OF NEW MEXICO County of Bernalillo SS
Bill Tafoya, being duly sworn, declares and says that he is Classified Advertising Manager of The Albuquerque Journal, and that this newspaper is duly qualified to publish legal notices or advertisements within the meaning of Section 3, Chapter 167, Session Laws of 1937, and that payment therefore has been made of assessed as court cost; that the notice, copy of which is hereto attached, was published in said paper in the regular daily edition, for

### ~ times, the first publication being on the \ 

# S day of 

# ---...._N\**(~** t.. , , 

## f1

. bl'

.**--'f---J-v~** _ 

### quent consecutive pu 1cat10ns on
__ _**------------~~~~~-4-+------------------------~20**

### ___.

Sworn and subscri edt before me, a NotaryPublic, in and for the County of alillo and State of New Mexico this '

# ~day of 

# )Y\ a..h , of 2001. 

# +------? \ t



### PRICE

# -t'\ ;!_,

# ~ 1 

# 0

# ~· Statement to come at end of month.
ACCOUNT NUMBER CLA-22-A (R-1/93)

### ~NVOOO**~~** 

# P- 6-e-qfi'""-MESA DIRECTIVA PARA EL MEJORAMlENTO DEL

MEDIO AMBlENTE DE NUEVO MEXICO DECLARACION DE AUDIENCIA PUBUCA SOBRE REGLAMENTOS La Mesa Directive para el mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico ('Comite') tendra una audiencia publica el 3de abril
1 del 2007 a las 9:00 a.m. en Ia Alamosa Multi-Service Center, Sala A, 6900 Gonzales Rd, SW, Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico 871-21. El proposito de Iajunta es considerar Ia importancia de EIB 06-16 {R), revis1ones propuestas para los reglamentos del control de Ia calioad del a ire 20.2.78 NMAC (Estandares de Emisiones de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire) y20.2.82 NMAC {Estandares para el_ progreso del control y el maximo mejoramiento de Fuente de Categorias de Contaminantes Peligrosos delAire) El defensor de Ia propuesta para Ia revision de los reglamentos es. el Departamento del Media Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico (NMED). NMED propane revisar el 20.2.78 NMAC para incorporar Ia referencia federal de los Estandares de Emisiones de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire. La propuesta de NMED es revisar el 20.2.82 para incorporar Ia referencia federal los Estandares para et progreso del control yel maximo mejoramiento de Fuente de Categonas de Con: taminantes Peligrosos del Aire. Se puede revisar las reglas propuestas durante las horas de ne- 1 gocio en Ia oficina del Departamento de Ia Calidad del Aire de NMED, 2044· Gaisteo, Santa Fe, Nuevo Mexico. El Texto complete de las reglas propuestas estan disponibles en el s1tio www.nmenv.state.r.m.us. Tambien puede contactar aRobert Spillers par telefono (505) 955-8046 op!!l correo electronico robert.spillers@state.nm.us. La audiencia publica sera realizada en acuerdo a 20.1.1 NMAC 1 fProcedimientos de Reglas • La 1Mesa Directiva para el Mejo- ·ramiento del MedJo Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico), el Aero para Mejorar el Annbiente, Seccion 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, el Acto para el Contot de Ia Calidad del Aire, 74-2-6 NMSA 1978, ytambien otras procedimientos aplicables. Todas las personas interesadas seran dado la oportunidad asom- eter evidencia pertinente, datos y

1 opinions oral o escrito, intoduar
1 evidencia yexaminertestigos. Las
· personas que desean presenter testimonio tecnico Ieinen que someter una nota escrita. La nota escrita debe de: {1) identificar Ia**~ersona·** para quien el (los) test1go(s) testific-

### ~)\~entificar cada testigo tecnico que Ia persona piensa presentar y indicarlas calificaciones del testigo incluyendo una descripcion de s.u

.educacion ytrabajo. (3) resumiroincluyir una copia del testimonio directo de cada testigo tecnico eindicar Ia duracion antlc- _pada del testimonio. (4) dar una descripcion o incluyir cada muestra que Ia personaof- recera en Ia vista del publico, y (5) incluyir et texto de cualquier modificacion a las regulaciones re•tisadas propuestas. Notificacion de intencion _Para Ia vista publ"1ca debe ser rec1b1de en Ia oficina del Comite antes de las 5:00 pm el 19_de marzo y debe contener el numero legal, ElB 06-16 (R), y Ia lecha .de Ia vista Debe de mandar not111caaon de intencion para presentar testimonio tecnico a: Joyce Medina, Board Administrator Office of the Environmental Improvement Board Harold Runnels Building 1190 St."Francis Dr., Room N-2150 /2153 Santa Fe. NM 87502 Phone: (So5\ 827-2425, Fax (505) 827-2836 Cualquier miembro.del gran publi- co puede testificar en Ia vista. No es necesario dar notificacion antes de presentartestimonio que no es tecnico. La persona puede ofrecer muestras que penenece al testimonio. Cualquier miembro del gran publi- co que desel! someter una declaracion escrita para el reg1stro, en vez de proporcionar testimonio oral en Ia vista, tiene que someter · Ia declaracion escrita antes de Ia vista osometerlo durante Ia vista. Las personas que tienen una incapacidad y**neces~an** ayuda para ser parte del proceso deben de contactar aJudy Bentley antes de et 19 de marzo, 2007 en el NMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box 26110, 1190 St. Fran_cis Drive Santa Fe, Nuevo Mex1co, 87502 telefono 505-827-9872. Los que usan el servicio de 'TDY' fa- vor de conseguir el acceso de su numero par el New Mexico Relay Network 1-800-659-8331. Es posible que el**Com~e** tamara una decicion sabre las**r~gula** ciones revisadas propuestas al conclucion de esta vista o el 

### yo- mtte puede convocar una reumon despues de Ia vista para consid- erar acion sabre Ia propuesta. Journal: March**1~~5,_., 2,.-C00~7.___** __

### MESA DIRECTIVA PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE DE NUEVO MEXICO DECLARACION DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA SOBRE REGLAMENTOS
LaMesa Directivaparael mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico ("Comite") tendrauna audiendapublica el 3 de abril del 2007 a las 9:00 a.m. en Ia AlamosaMulti-Service Center, SalaA, 6900 Gonzales Rd., SW, Albuquerque, Nuevo Mexico 87121. Elprop6sito de Iajuntaes considerar Ia importancia de Em 06-16 (R), revisiones propuestas para los reglamentos del control de Ia calidad del aire 20.2.78 NMAC (Estandares de Emisiones de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire) y 20.2.82 NMAC (Estandares para el progreso del control y el maximo mejoramiento de Fuente de Categorias de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire)
El defensor de Ia propuestaparaIa revision de los reglamentos es el Departamento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico (NMED).
NMED proponerevisar el20.2.78 NMACpara incorporar Ia referenda federal de los Estandares de Emisi6nes de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire. Lapropuestade NMED es revisar el20.2.82 para incorporar Ia referendafederal los Estandares parael progreso del control y el maximo mejoramiento de Fuente de Categorias de Contaminantes Peligrosos del Aire.
Se puede revisar las reglas propuestas durante las horas de negocio en Ia oficina del Departamento de Ia Calidad del Aire de NMED, 2044 Gaisteo, SantaFe, Nuevo Mexico. El Texto completo de las reglas propuestas estan disponibles en el sitio www.nmenv.state.nm.us. Tambien puede contactar a Robert Spillers portelefono (505) 955-8046 o por correo electr6nico robert.spillers@state.nm.us.
La audiencia publica sera realizada en acuerdo a 20.1.1 NMAC (Procedimientos de Reglas -LaMesa Directiva para el Mejoramiento del Medio Ambiente de Nuevo Mexico), el Acto paraMejorar el Ambiente, Secci6n 74-1-9 NMSA 1978, el Acto para el Contol de Ia Calidad del Aire, 74-2-6NMSA 1978, y tambien otras procedimientos aplicables.
Todas las personas interesadas seran dado Ia oportunidad a someter evidenciapertinente, datos y opinions oral o escrito, intoducir evidenciay examiner testigos. Laspersonas que desean presentar testimonio tecnico teinen que someterunanota escrita. Lanota escrita debe de: 

### (1) identificar Ia personaparaquien el (los) testigo(s) testificara{n) (2) identificar cadatestigo tecnico que Ia persona piensapresentary indicar las calificaci6nes del testigo incluyendo una descripci6n de su educaci6n y trabajo. (3) resumir o incluyiruna copia del testimonio directo de cadatestigo tecnico e indicar Ia duraci6n anticipada del testimonio. (4) daruna descripci6n o incluyir cada muestra que Ia persona ofrecera en Ia vista del publico, y (5) incluyir el texto de cualquiermodificaci6n a las regulaci6nes revisadas propuestas. Notificaci6n de intenci6n para Ia vistapublica debe ser recibido en Ia oficina del Comite antes de las 5:00 pro el 19 de marzo y debe contener el numero legal, EIB 06-16 (R), y Ia fecha de Ia vista. Debe de mandar notificaci6n de intenci6n parapresentar testimonio tecnico a: Joyce Medina, BoardAdministrator Office ofthe Environmental Improvement Board Harold Runnels Building 1190 St. Francis Dr., Room N-2150 /2153 SantaFe, NM 87502 Phone: (505) 827-2425, Fax(505) 827-2836 Cualquier miembro del gran 

### publico puede testificar en Ia vista. No es necesario darnotificaci6n antes de presentartestimonio que no es tecnico. La 

### personapuede ofrecermuestras que pertenece al testimonio.

### Cualquiermiembro del gran

### publico que desea someter una declaraci6n escritaparael registro, en vez de proporcionartestimonio oral enIa vista, tiene que someter Ia declaraci6n escrita antes de Ia vista o someterlo durante Ia vista. ·

Las 

### personas que tienenuna incapacidady necesitan ayudapara serparte del proceso deben de contactar a Judy Bentley antes de el19 de marzo, 2007 en elNMED, Personnel Services Bureau, P.O. Box26110, 1190 St. Francis Drive, Santa Fe, Nuevo Mexico, 87502, telefono 505-827-9872. Los que usan el servicio de "TDY''favor de conseguir el acceso de su nt1mero porelNewMexico Relay Network 1-800-659-8331.
Esposible que el Comite tomaraunadecici6n sobre las regulaciones revisadas propuestas al concluci6n de esta vista o el Comitepuede convocarunareunion despues de Ia vistaparaconsiderar aci6n sobre Ia propuesta.