alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Served: September 24, 2010

U N I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T

I O N UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

JOINT APPLICATION FOR A PENDENTE LITE EXEMPTION

AND MOTION FOR A SHORTENED ANSWER PERIOD

Docket DOT

- OST

- 20 10

- 02 24

NOTICE SHORTENING ANSWER PERIOD

On Septe mber 2

, 2010 Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. (“ASA ”) and ExpressJet Airlines, Inc

., (“ ExpressJet ”) (collectively, the “Joint Applicants”) filed a joint application requesting that the Department grant them a pendente lite exemption from section 41105 of Title 49 of the United States Code (the Statute) to enable ExpressJet to continue to operate certain international authority under common ownership with ASA

.

On September 22, 2010

, the Joint Applicants amended the application to formally include SkyWest Airlines, Inc. (“SkyWest”), as an applicant to the transfer of ExpressJet’s international route authority. SkyWest, Inc., the corporate parent of ASA, is also the parent of SkyWest, and thus has common ownership of both ASA and SkyWest thereby making Sky West a relevant party to the transaction. Concurrently, the Joint Applications filed a motion requesting that the Department shorten the answer period in this case to September 29

, 2010

, 1 to facilitate their request for expedited action in this matter and to enable the Joint Applicants to proceed with

their commercial transaction.

On September 24 , 2010 , the Joint Applicants orally advised the Department that there were no objections to shortening the answer period

. 2 Under these circumstances, we have d ecided to grant the Joint Applicants’ request for a shortened answer period in this case. Therefore, acting under authority assigned in 14 CFR 385.12, answers to the Joint Applicants ’ request for a pendente lite exemption will no w be due no later than Sep tember 29

, 20 10

.

We will serve this notice by email or facsimile on all parties served with the request. We authorize answers to the application to be served by email or facsimile.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this notic e under the Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR 385.30, may file their petitions within 10 days of the service date of this

order.

1 Because the Joint Applicants amended their exemption application, answers to the exemption re quest would be due on October 7, 2010 (14 CFR 302.307)

. 2 By letter dated September 24 , 2010, the Joint Applicants confirmed these polling results.2

This notice is effective immediately and the filing of a petition for reconsideration shall not alter

its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: http:// www.regulations.gov
October 27, 2015

Mr. Garrett Hayes

Aqua Survey, Inc.

469 Barbertown Point Breeze Road

Flemington, NJ 08822

Dear Mr. Hayes:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your May 29, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Aqua Survey, Inc. filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−2950, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

MARIO AKOTHE, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

WARDEN BEAR, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

No. 17-6221 

(D.C. No. 5:17-CV-00693-D) 

(W.D. Okla.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

_________________________________ 

Before KELLY, MURPHY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

The district court denied Oklahoma state prisoner Mario Akothe’s application 

for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the ground that it was untimely under 28 

U.S.C. § 2244(d). To appeal that ruling, Mr. Akothe must obtain a certificate of 

appealability (“COA”) from this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (requiring a 

COA to appeal “the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention 

complained of arises out of process issued by a State court”). To obtain a COA, he 

must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

 *

 This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the 

case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

December 27, 2017

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

accord Dulworth v. Jones, 496 F.3d 1133, 1137 (10th Cir. 2007). 

Mr. Akothe does not address timeliness in his brief requesting a COA. 

Although we liberally construe Mr. Akothe’s filings because he represents himself, 

we do not act as his advocate. Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 927 n.1 (10th Cir. 

2008). Without an argument from Mr. Akothe as to why reasonable jurists would 

debate the district court’s ruling, we must deny a COA and dismiss this matter. We 

also deny Mr. Akothe’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 

 

Entered for the Court 

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. 

Circuit Judge
### PHANTOM 3 ADVANCED Release Note s

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 22 Overview : 1. All
- in
- One F irmware version updated to : v1. 1.9 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed issue of some aircraft unable to determine their altitudes. 2. Fixed issue of the DJI Pilot app unable to obtain and display battery error history. 3. Fixed issue of the compass calibration progress not being displayed properly. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to updat e the firmware version to v1.1.9 , otherwise future firmwar e will not be able to install.  Users may skip updating the remote controller if they have already updated the firmware to v1.1.8 , as the latest firmware update does not affect the remote controller.

### PHANTOM 3 ADVANCED Release Note s

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 8 Overview : 2. All
- in
- One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.8 

### Major Updates : 4. Fixed the issue of failure to update the firmware if the remote controller is turned off. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.8, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Re
- link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware update . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 6 Overview : 1. All
- in
- One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.6 2. DJI Pilot app iOS version updated to: v1.1.1 3. DJI Pilot app Android version updated to: v1.1.0 

### Major Updates : 1. Updated to be compatible with the iOS version of the DJI Pilot app. 

### Notice : Re
- link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware upgrade.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

p1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139641 

TORIANO JACOE TISDALE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139641 

 COA: 285267 

Wayne CC: 07-707476-NM 

LAURA KATHLEEN SUTTON, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### SERVED: JUNE 

### 18, 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
·IN THE MATTER OF 

### M & 

### R HELICOPTERS, LLC

FAA DOCKETNo. CPIOS00011 (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2010-1211
ORDER CORRECTING TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING The following corrections are hereby made inthe transcript ofthe hearing held January 26 and 27, 2012:
PAGE LINE READS SHOULD READ 108 2 employee employer 114 16 wholePRM NRPM 150 17 21.53(b) 2150.3B 164 18 Q. A. 304 2 21.53(b) 2150.3B

-**··~** ·:.-·2 SO ORDERED.

Attachment

- Service List

### REVISED SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration· 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. ·Washington, DC 20591

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Michael Selig, MD, FACC, CFI-H,

Respondent'sRepresentative 2816 Orefield Road Allentown, P A 18104 TEL: 610-360-3953 FAX: 

### ONE COPY

Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Enforcement Division/AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-3357 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20**·~** U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536 FAADocket No. CP10S00011 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 SeiVice was by U.S. Mail. For seJ.Vice inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilb1,1rWright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ··.;..·
#### TIETEX INTERNATIONAL LTD., Appellant v. PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC., Appellee

2016-1748

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 10, 2017

Jamaica P. Szeliga, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by Neil C. Jones, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Greenville, SC; James Robertson, J.M. Robertson, LLC, Birmingham, AL.

Lynne A. Borchers, Sage Patent Group, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Peter Daniel Siddo-way.

(Dyk, O’Malley, and Wallach, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.01
 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF MOVE, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ STEVEN H. BERKOWITZSteven H. BerkowitzChief Executive Officer
Move, Inc.
Date: November 9, 2009  85
## Ryan Montgomery’s Petition **for Exemption** 

1. Operator’s name and address; Ryan Montgomery 9933 Panther Ct Aumsville, OR 97325 Cell: 503
- 576
- 1530 2. The specific applicable regulations from which relief is required (CFRs); 3. How the operator will maintain an equivalent level of safety or no adverse impact to safety; I will ensure the work I do will be safe, ensuring that I check any mechanical/maintenance found in the owner’s manual of the drone. (I don’t have specific until I purchase one) I will only be flying when the weather is nice to not have to deal with wind or rain. People will not be present, and if they are I would have a landing area with signs to ensure people around me know there is a flying drone in progress and to stand back a given amount of feet near the flying zone
. I have tried to contact other people doing this kind of work in other states to get more knowledge about this industry but so far no luck but will continue to try and seek more answers.
4. How granting the exemption would be in the public interest; I currently own a small sign company and deal with a wide range of current people who could use aerial photography in their daily work. As I am unsure entirely of what my capabilities of a UAV could do, my hope that I can offer aerial photography to my real estate friends and people I have met throughout my 5 years making signs that it will help in future real estate sales with a new look on a home’s pictures from the sky in high definition. 5. The proposed operations; and, My proposed operation is to start up a small aerial photography business dealing specifically with the real estate market to list future houses for sale, in extension to that could turn into real estate land for sale and business wanting to display th eir building/office in a nice visually appealing photograph. As a 24 year old entrepreneur I hope I can continue my success by adding this level of work into my current sign business of 5 years and grow aerial photography into a successful venture for me and my families future. I am driven individual and although I do not know how to operate an aerial drone nor have all the answer on how to safely fly one (yet) I will figure out and will always put myself and others in a safe position while it’s aerial. 6. The make and model of the aircraft for proposed operations (aircraft manuals are not necessary). I am looking at a Phantom 3 Professional drone that has a range of 400’ and the work I will be doing I don’t see a need/desire to have to go above that distance. Ready to submit your petition? Note: Proprietary/Confidential documents should be clearly marked and emailed to 333exemptions@faa.gov. Be sure to include your comment tracking number (received uponsuccessful submission to regulations.gov) when emailing these documents. Do not submit them

to regulations.gov.
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2015
(the Report), I, Joseph Fuda, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: March 14, 2016 | /s/
      Joseph Fuda        
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Joseph Fuda                  
|                     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     | (Principal executive officer)

---
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.2


                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of National Auto Credit,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), do hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
-------------------------------
Name: Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  September 18, 2003


















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to National Auto Credit, Inc. and
will be retained by National Auto Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       39
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements of The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999     DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                     2,840,242        3,985,786
<SECURITIES>                                       0          500,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              6,659,480        6,284,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                 257,000          291,000
<INVENTORY>                               17,693,432       16,066,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          27,807,419       27,412,112
<PP&E>                                    21,458,361       19,555,956
<DEPRECIATION>                            11,413,059        9,757,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            39,688,056       39,471,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      4,275,831        5,253,602
<BONDS>                                            0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                0
<COMMON>                                   1,712,638        1,437,276
<OTHER-SE>                                32,503,370       31,695,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              39,688,056       39,471,045
<SALES>                                   55,751,215       60,144,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          55,751,215       60,144,243
<CGS>                                     41,335,806       43,076,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             49,592,952       50,973,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            6,158,263        9,170,755
<INCOME-TAX>                               2,377,494        3,514,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                0
<CHANGES>                                          0                0
<NET-INCOME>                               3,780,759        5,656,005
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.66            0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.66            0.97



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Gregory C. Talbott is the Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o (d)) and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to PFF Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFF Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                |  |                                                                                                                  
|--------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Gregory C. Talbott                                                                                           
|Dated           |  | Gregory C. Talbott Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer