alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.01
  SCHEDULE II 
    VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
  Years
    ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
 (In
    thousands)
  Balance at


Charged to





Write-offs


BalanceBeginning


Costs and





Net of


at End ofof Year


Expenses


Other


Recoveries


YearAllowance for Doubtful
    Accounts2006

$
1,377


$
2,200


$



$
(246
)

$
3,3312005


1,399



731







(753
)


1,3772004


5,377



340



367
(1)


4,685



1,399Valuation Allowance for
    Deferred Tax Assets2006

$
399,444


$
(41,534
)

$







$
357,9102005


379,191



20,253











399,4442004


422,303



(43,112
)










379,191     (1)
    
    Charged to Discontinued Operations in 2004.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Pungello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML JWH Strategic Allocation Fund
L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a.) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005
------------------

By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO
   -----------------------
Michael L. Pungello
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6792

ANTONIO COX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. F. AMONETTE; DAVID SMITH, Warden Camp #1; M. AMONETTE, Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-00-181-7) Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 14, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: This appeal is before us on Appellant Antonio Cox’s petition for rehearing. We dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, based on the timing of Cox’s filing of his notice of appeal. However, in light of evidence that the district court had granted Cox an extension of time to file his notice of appeal out of time, we grant rehearing and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cox v. Amonette , No. CA-00-181-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Michael Christopher STOFFA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeffery B. KISER, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7327

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: May 3, 2017

Jonathan P. • Sheldon, SHELDON, FLOOD & HAYWOOD, PLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Christopher Stoffa seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) *191(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Wien the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stoffa has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6651

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 603 West 3rd Street in Necedah, Wisconsin, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth 
                   E. Murphy Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2023

 Mr. Tiffany (for himself, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Gallagher, Mr. 
  Steil, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Van Orden, Mr. Fitzgerald, and Mr. Grothman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 603 West 3rd Street in Necedah, Wisconsin, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth 
                   E. Murphy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH E. MURPHY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 603 West 3rd Street in Necedah, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth E. Murphy Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth E. Murphy Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                   THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

      In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Walter W. Buckley, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Walter W. Buckley, III
------------------------------------
Walter W. Buckley, III
Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth W. Bell, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pacific WebWorks,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



                               /s/ Kenneth W. Bell
Date: March 29, 2005           ____________________________________
                               Kenneth W. Bell
                               Principal Financial Officer
#### MULTIMEDIA PLUS, INC., Multimedia Technologies, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. PLAYERLYNC LLC, Defendant-Appellee

2016-2574

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 16, 2017

Barry Evan Negrin, Kane Kessler, P.C., New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ryan Aftel Tyz, Tyz Law Group PC, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee.

(Prost, Chief Judge, O’Malley and Chen, Circuit Judges).

*578JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,713
<INVENTORY>                                     13,176
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,194
<PP&E>                                          11,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,265
<SALES>                                         14,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,545
<CGS>                                           10,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,667)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,667)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32











Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Kent A. Steinwert, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen W.
Haley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. $ 1350), that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. $ 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








March 7,
2008








/s/ Kent
A. Steinwert


________________________


Kent A.
Steinwert


President
& Chief Executive Officer











/s/
Stephen W. Haley


________________________


Stephen
W. Haley


Executive
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### GUO YONG YANG, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2241

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 2017

Decided: May 23, 2017

*225Khagendra Gharti-Chhetry, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, Wendy Benner-León, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Guo Yong Yang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the various documentary exhibits, the transcript of Yang’s merits hearings, and his supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 88 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re Yang*(B.I.A. Oct. 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (235)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.00)



</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13 - 24 - 00189 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF L.R.C., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. B - 22 - 1329 - CV - A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. No costs are assessed, due to appellant ’ s inability to pa y costs . We further order this decision certified below for observance. Ju ne 20, 2024