alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.39

# LEASE EXTENSION

CB Richard Ellis Limited
#600 - 1111 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC  V6E 4M3

Attention:    Ms. Lisa Bailey and Mr. Blair Quinn

|Re: |  | Leases  between  Pivotal   Corporation  (the  "Tenant")  and
                Dunsmuir and Hornby Ltd.  (the  "Landlord")  for the 4th and
                6th floor premises of the building  located at 885 Dunsmuir,
                Vancouver,    BC   (the   "Building")   dated   August   18,
                2000.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

Pivotal Corporation hereby
provides notice to the Landlord as per the Schedule D Special
Provisions Option to Extend clauses to extend the lease of the
4th and 6th floor premises for a period of five (5) months
commencing May 1, 2002 and expiring September 30, 2002 on the same terms
and conditions as the 6th floor premises less the leasing commission.

Pivotal Corporation hereby
exercises their Right of First Refusal as per the Schedule D Special
Provisions of the 6th Floor Lease as follows:

|Premises:          |  | 7th Floor - approximately 12,000 square feet
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Commencement Date: |  | May 1, 2002                                 
|Expiry Date:       |  | September 30, 2002                          
|Rental Rate:       |  | Market rental rates                         

A party hereto may signify
its agreement to the terms hereof by facsimile transmission. A telecopy
facsimile of this agreement received by a party hereto which shows the
signature(s) of the authorized signatory(ies) of the other party will be good
proof of execution by that other party.

DATED at North Vancouver this 30th day of October, 2001.

PIVOTAL CORPORATION
Per:     [SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE]   
    [SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE]       
         (Authorized Signatory) 
              
             (Witness)

ACCEPTED at ____________________ this ____ day of _________________, 2001.

DUNSMUIR & HORNBY LTD.
Per:        
           
         (Authorized Signatory) 
              
     (Witness)
**Exhibit      10.18                                                                                         **

| **North                  Central Bancshares, Inc.**                                       |   | **First                  Federal Savings Bank of Iowa** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
| /s/                  Melvin R. Schroeder                                                  |   | /s/                  C. Thomas Chalstrom                |
| *Name*                                                                                    |   | *Name*                                                  |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
| Compensation                  Committee Chairman                                          |   | President                                               |
| *Title*                                                                                   |   | *Title*                                                 |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
| **Agreed                  to and accepted on** **October                  31, 2007** |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
|                                                                                      |   |                                                    |
| /s/                  David M. Bradley                                                     |   |                                                    |
| *David                  M. Bradley*                                                       |   |                                                    |
[EXHIBIT 32.2]


   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
            OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   I,  Garth Jensen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of
2002,  that the Annual Report of North American Liability  Group,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the   Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  that  information
contained  in  such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in  all  material
respects  the  financial condition and results of  operations  of
NorMexSteel, Inc.



By: /s/ Garth Jensen
   ---------------------------------
   Name:  Garth Jensen
   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### Galloway *vs.*Hamilton.

Oct. 5.

Error to the Bath Circuit; Silas W. Robbins, Judge.

*Parties. Practice. Mandate. Costs.*

Chancery. Case 95.

vendorof °f land, to subjectittopayment of the uey° a^sub-purchaser mustbemade pai *7‘*

Bill dismissod absolute-,y’"hu0 have hoon without prejudice:deoree reversed.

Costs refused.

*Triplett*for plaintiff.

Judge Mills

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The objectof Galloway’s bill being to subject land Hamilton, to the payment of a debt contracted by Moore, in purchasing the land from Galloway, it was irregular to hear and decide the cause upon f¡ie merits without the appearance of Moore, or the service of process upon him, though it would have been competent for the court, in consequence of Hamilton’s failure to bring Moore before the court, to have dismissed the bill without prejudice to any other suit.

But, as instead of doing so, the bill was absolutely dismissed, ^ie decree must be reversed, the cause re-«landed to the court below, and a decree entered, dismissing tiie bill without prejudice, to the right of Galloway in any future suit.

Each party must pay their own cost in this court.
#### FOLENI of Fagatogo, Plaintiff v. FAATELEUPU of Fagatogo, Defendant

No. 12-1935

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Matai Name: “Sarnia”]

December 30,1936

December 30, 1936

The proponent of the name Sarnia was Faateleupu who was represented by Amituanai as counsel.

The objector was Foleni who was represented by Aumavae as counsel.

DECISION

At the Annual Fono of 1936 the Eastern District, through its spokesman, a descendant of Tuiasosopo Sarnia, laid great stress upon the demand that the High Court in the decision of matai name cases should limit its inquiry to the sole question of which of the candidates has the best hereditary right to the name.

*542The proponent of the name Sarnia in this case is a grandson of a former holder of the name — the objector is a son of the last holder of the name.

According to the demand of the Eastern District, what else can the Court consider ?

Certainly the son of the last holder of the name has a greater right than the grandson of a former holder. There can be no dispute on this question.

If the Court could consider the questions raised as to pule; the fitness of a candidate to hold the office of matai; whether or not he is the choice of a majority of the family, or the other chiefs of his village, the decision in this case might be different, but as the Eastern District desires that hereditary right alone shall be considered, the Court has no alternative but to award the matai name Sarnia to Foleni.

The Court costs amounting to $25.00 shall be paid by Faateleupu.

SO ORDERED.

HIGH COURT OF AMERICAN SAMOA

Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division

No. 1-1935

[REMOVAL OF MATAI-NAME “MAGAEA” FROM TAP ASA]

January 29,1937

We, the undersigned are members of the “Magaea Family” at Amouli, hereby respectfully request the Honorable High Court of American Samoa for withdrawal of the foregoing Case for the reason that this matter has been settled amongst ourselves amicably.

*543The present holder of the name is to keep the same.

s/Suaese Utu

s/Magaea

s/Afaga

s/Sinanene

The subscribers to this document appeared before me this 29th day of January, 1937, and severally acknowledged that they signed the same as their own act and deed.

s/H. P. Wood

Chief Justice of American Samoa
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         203,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,117,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,500
<INVENTORY>                                  4,179,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,784,108
<PP&E>                                       1,758,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                 880,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,679,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,762,046
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,636,638
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      5,043,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,043,954
<CGS>                                        3,769,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,769,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               932,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,017
<INCOME-TAX>                                   118,957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   186,060
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.01 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF HOMESTORE, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Homestore, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned W. Michael Long, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ W. MICHAEL LONGW. Michael LongChief Executive Officer
Homestore, Inc.
Date: March 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Homestore, Inc. and will be retained by Homestore, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 11
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6602 

AN ACT 

To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 relating 

to the review of the interagency dispute resolution process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6602 EH

1 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF INTERAGENCY DISPUTE RESOLU2 TION PROCESS. 

3 Section 1763(c) of the Export Control Reform Act 

4 of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4822(c)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘In any case’’ and inserting the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In any case’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘countries subject to a com9 prehensive United States arms embargo,’’ after 

10 ‘‘matters relating to’’; 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘may be decided’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘shall be decided’’; 

13 (4) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The 

14 chair of the Committee is authorized to decide any 

15 case or matter described in the preceding sentence 

16 in which the Committee is unable to decide the case 

17 or matter by majority vote.’’; and 

18 (5) by further adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In paragraph (1), the term 

20 ‘country subject to a comprehensive United States 

21 arms embargo’ means— 

22 ‘‘(A) any country listed on table 1 to para23 graph (d)(1) of section 126.1 of title 22, Code 

24 of Federal Regulations (as such section is in ef25 fect on the day before the date of the enact26 ment of this paragraph); and 
3 

•HR 6602 EH

1 ‘‘(B) the Russian Federation.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 19, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6602 

AN ACT 

To amend the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 

resolution process. relating to the review of the interagency dispute
#### Anson CHI, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John DOE #1, et al., Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-10584

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 14, 2017

*294Anson Chi, Pro Se

Before JONES, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Anson Chi, Texas prisoner # 312275, moves for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris (IFP) in an appeal of the district court’s dismissal of his motions in limine; for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b); for leave to file a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 supplemental complaint; for reconsideration of the denial of leave to amend his § 1983 complaint; to recuse; for a televised trial; and to change the filing dates of his motions. Chi filed these motions after the district court dismissed his § 1983 complaint as frivolous. His IFP motion is a challenge to the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

Chi’s § 1983 complaint alleged a wide conspiracy among diverse defendants to kill him by lethal injection, using a remote device, as he recovered from injuries sustained by a bomb. The district court dismissed Chi’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(l) and 1915(e)(2)(B)® as frivolous. We agree that Chi has not shown that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal with respect to the motions he filed following the dismissal of his complaint. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, we deny his motion for leave to proceed IFP and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. *See Baugh,*117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Our dismissal of Chi’s appeal from the denial of the motions he filed following the dismissal of his § 1983 complaint counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir, 1996). Chi also received two strikes when the district court dismissed his § 1983 complaint as frivolous and we dismissed his appeal from the dismissal of his § 1983 complaint as frivolous. Because he has accumulated at least three strikes under § 1915(g), Chi is barred from proceeding IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's Committee on Oversight hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, February 22, 2022, from 3:00-4:00 p.m. EST.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda of the teleconference is: Chair's 
opening remarks; approval of prior Committee minutes; discussion of 
requests for changes to Merit Review Digest; the Office of the 
Inspector General update; Chief Financial Officer update; report on 
pilots--Merit Review training and Broader Impacts expertise on 
Committees of Visitors.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac9c8c6cbc3d8eac4d9cc84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd8d9d7dad2c9fbd5c8dd95dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000. The meeting may be 
viewed live at https://youtu.be/U-oAd7QUUXI. Meeting updates may be 
found at the National Science Board website at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-03626 Filed 2-15-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the forty weeks ended January 5, l999
included in this report on Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000  <F1>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-05-1999
<CASH>                                          61,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  181,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,600
<INVENTORY>                                     78,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               375,900
<PP&E>                                       1,392,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 654,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,495,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,500
<BONDS>                                          1,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,495,000
<SALES>                                      1,484,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,484,600
<CGS>                                          842,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  842,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<FN>
<F1>Footnote to electronic filing only:  as presented,
data is rounded to the nearest $100 except for per 
share data.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00174

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

00174\00174_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00174\00174_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00174\00174_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00174\00174_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00174\00174_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00174\00174_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00174\Certification Statement Plant ID 00174.pdf Plant certification statement

00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-Cane Run A5-2 - Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-CR - Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-CR - D-1 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 1011r5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-CR - D-2 Wastewater Treatment Block Diagram - 1011r5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-CR - WB-1 Water Balance Block Diagram - 1011r5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00174\Supplemental Documents\00174_LGE-CR - WB-2 Water Balance Block Diagram - 1011r5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00174\00174_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00174\00174_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.