alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6651 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6651

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
603 West 3rd Street in Necedah, Wisconsin, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth E. 
                     Murphy Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH E. MURPHY POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 603 West 3rd Street in Necedah, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth E. Murphy Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth E. Murphy Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0349]

Notice is hereby given that Main Street Capital III, L.P., 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the “Act”), in connection with a financing involving small concern Charps, LLC located at 453 Tower St. NW, Clearbrook, MN 56634, provided notice of this transaction to the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) pursuant to the Regulations found at 13 CFR 107. The financing is brought within the purview of 13 CFR 107.730—Financings which constitute conflicts of interests, of the Regulations because Charps, LLC is an Associate of Main Street Capital III, L.P. because Associate Main Street Equity Investment, Inc. owns a greater than ten percent interest in the Charps, LLC.

This financing is pursuant to § 107.730 (f) of the Regulations because Main Street Capital III, L.P.'s parent corporation, Main Street Capital Corporation, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and received an exemption from the Securities and Exchange Commission for the transaction.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

U.S. Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-04228 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted
from financial  statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001086473
<NAME>                        Banyan Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                       32423
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                46874
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                   6693
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,533,330
<PP&E>                                       36160
<DEPRECIATION>                               18481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,799,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       715458
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                 4,310,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 334906
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,799,521
<SALES>                                     141176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            317550
<CGS>                                        52565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                66711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            118325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           19838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            980,079
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        980,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               980,079
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.10




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT OT
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report of Liberty Self-Stor, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Richard M. Osborne,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, C. Jean
Mihitsch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

Date: March 24, 2004                      By: /s/ RICHARD M. OSBORNE
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard M. Osborne
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 24, 2004                      By: /s/ C. JEAN MIHITSCH
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            C. Jean Mihitsch
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### Earl JACKSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. C. V. RIVERA, (originally named as USA) Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-1856

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 4, 2017

Filed: October 31, 2017

*592Earl Jackson, Pro Se

Richard Pence, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal prisoner Earl Jackson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his sentence, which was enhanced under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)), based on Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 2557, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). The district court denied the petition as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We construe Jackson’s notice of appeal as a request for authorization to file a successive section 2255 motion, and grant the request, as Jackson has made a prima facie showing that he no longer has three qualifying convictions to support an ACCA sentence. See Menteer v. United States, 806 F.3d 1156, 1156 (8th Cir. 2015) (this court may grant authorization only if applicant makes prima facie showing that he has met requirements of § 2255(h)); Woods v. United States, 805 F.3d 1152, 1153-54 (8th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (prima facie showing is sufficient showing of possible merit to warrant further exploration by district court). While we express no views on whether any section 2255 motion filed by Jackson in the district court is timely filed or has merit, we note that he protectively filed a timely section 2255 motion raising claims based on Johnson in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri on June 26, 2016.
IN THE THIRD COURT OFAPPEALS OF TEXAS ATAUSTIN
NO.03-14-00404-CV KEVIN TOWER AND KARRIE LYNN TOWER, Appellants,

v. BANK OFAMERICA, N.A. Appellee.
APPELLANTS FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLYBRIEF COMES NOW APPELLANTS Kevin Tower and Lynn Tower ("Appellants") and files this their First Motionfor Extension of Time to file a Reply Brief, and in support thereof, would show as follows: I. FACTS 1. This matteroriginated from the Hays County Court at Law. Appellants' were the Defendant's in a case styled, Bankof America, N.A. v. Kevin Tower, Cause No. 13-0320-C. 2. Appellants' received notice that Appellee's brief was filed on March 12, 2015 

### thereby making the deadline for filing aReply BriefApril 1, 2015.' 3. Appellant Kevin Tower was recently promoted at his employ which has caused 

### great delay in a number of tasks most importantly the filing of the Reply Brief. With an inordinate number of additional tasks required of him with his new position he has had no time 

### to set aside two uninterrupted days to focus on crafting the arguments required for the Reply Brief.

Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure §38.6(c) ofwithin 20 days after the date the appellee's briefwas/I 

## JPcbvhT Appellants Motion forExtension ofTime

### 4. Itmust be noted that the Appellant's are fighting for their home, the single most important asset they own. Therefore it is desperately important that a Reply Brief be filed to distinguish certain important points oflaw.

II. ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES 

### 5. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(c) demands the Appellants' Reply Briefbesubmitted within 20days ofthe Appellee filing its brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(d) does, upon motion, allow for a 

### modification ofthe timelines inwhich to file the briefprovided this motion complies with Tex. R. App. P. 10.50(b), which the undersigned believes to be thecase. 

### 6. However, for good cause this Court may grant an extension. Appellants are confident that with the impending holiday twelve (12) additional days from the date of submission ofthis motion shall be sufficient time in which to file its brief.

III. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant preys that this Court grant an extension of time to file Appellants Appeal Brief. Respectfully submitted: Kevin Tc

Appellants Motion forExtension ofTime Page2 of 3CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### Ihereby certify that on this the 2^ day ofApril 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing was served as stated below pursuant to the Texas Rulesof Civil Procedure. Mr. Jonathan M. Williams Marinosci Law Group. P.C. 14643 Dallas Parkway. Suite 750 

### Dallas, Texas 75254 "

Appellants Motion forExtension ofTime Page 3 of3 Confirmed Facsimile to (972) 331-5240
In re David

RodriguezAppellant/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00112-CV

IN RE David RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On February 18, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on February 21st, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of February, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010PC2639, styled Maria I. Rodriguez, An Incapacitated Person,

pending in the Probate Court No. 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer presiding.

FILE COPY
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leslie Evans, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 900]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered April 10, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (three counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors *391and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). The court properly permitted elicitation of matters that were highly relevant to defendant’s credibility and were not unduly prejudicial.

We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the noninclusory concurrent counts *(see People v Spence,*290 AD2d 223 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 641 [2002]; *People v Kulakov,*278 AD2d 519 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 785 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      175300
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                77000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 16900
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            534900
<PP&E>                                      534200
<DEPRECIATION>                              116200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              970100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1185500
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     12900
<OTHER-SE>                                 (228300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                970100
<SALES>                                     254500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            254500
<CGS>                                       124200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5623100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (1300)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            6000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5497500)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (745400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (4752100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (4752100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.49)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A of Wavecom SA (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ron Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: November 8, 2005 |  | /s/
        RON BLACK                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                        |  | Ron Black
Chief Executive Officer
Wavecom SA
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50552

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mark R. Rehe, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Debra Ann Dilorio, Attorney, Law Office of Debra Dilorio, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

*429Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Alvarez-Jimenez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alvarez-Jimenez challenges the 16-level enhancement that the district court imposed on the basis of his 2013 aggravated assault conviction.

This sentencing appeal is moot because Alvarez-Jimenez has fully served his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release. *See United States v. Palomba,*182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-Q of NCI Building Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and3.
    
    The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NCI Building Systems, Inc.
  /s/ Norman C. ChambersNorman C. ChambersChairman of the Board,

President and Chief Executive Officer
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the Company) on Form
20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shabtai Adlersberg, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)        
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  | Date: June 2, 2005SHABTAI ADLERSBERG
Shabtai AdlersbergChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- 1 -

---

---
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

 
 



 
  

					
	Personal and Confidential	  	 May 22, 2012
  
	  	

 Ms. Laurie F. Gilner 
 9233 Weston Drive 
 Brentwood, TN 37027 
 Dear Laurie: 
 The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend certain provisions of your offer
letter, dated July 26, 2010, as amended (the “Offer Letter”). As we discussed, we have agreed as follows: 
 1. Effective
immediately, Section 1 of the Offer Letter shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 1. Contract Term
– The term of your employment will be five (5) years, commencing September 7, 2010 and ending September 6, 2015, unless terminated earlier by you or by CRG at any time as provided herein. Thereafter, your employment status with
CRG will continue to be that of an employee at-will, subject to termination by either you or CRG at any time. 
 2. In addition to reimbursement
of relocation expenses as set forth in Section 3 of the Offer Letter, we have agreed to pay you an additional $30,000 for your relocation costs. We will pay you such additional amount, less applicable tax withholdings and payroll deductions,
promptly after your execution of this letter agreement. 
 3. Effective immediately, the following paragraph shall be added as a new second
paragraph to Section 4 of the Offer Letter: 
 In the event that CRG terminates your employment without cause at any time on
or after September 6, 2013 but prior to September 6, 2015, and subject to your compliance with the terms and conditions of this letter agreement, CRG will pay you an amount equal to one year of your then-current annual base salary (less
applicable tax withholdings and payroll deductions). 
 In all other respects, the Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect according
to its terms and conditions. 
 402 BNA Dr. Building 100, Suite 600, Nashville, TN 37217 / 615-724-2800 







 Ms. Laurie F. Gilner 
 May 22, 2012 
 Page 7 
 Please confirm your understanding of the foregoing provisions by executing the enclosed counterpart of this letter and returning the executed counterpart to me. 

 

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	/s/ Christopher J. Munyan
	Christopher J. Munyan
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	C.R. Gibson, LLC


 The aforementioned is confirmed as of this 22nd day of May, 2012: 

 

	
	 /s/ Laurie F. Gilner

	Laurie F. Gilner
	cc: William G. Kiesling