alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Shabtai Adlersberg, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment no. 1 to annual report on Form 20-F/A of AudioCodes Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal controls.



Date:  September 22, 2004



/s/ SHABTAI ADLERSBERG

Shabtai Adlersberg

Chief Executive Officer





| |  | 
| |  |
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q ), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 Date: August 14, 2006
    
    /s/ John L. HigginsJohn L. HigginsChief Financial Officer;Executive Vice President, Finance
and Corporate Development
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6389 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6389

To eliminate the reduction in pay of a Federal employee or District of 
 Columbia employee as a result of such employee serving as a member of 
the National Guard of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2023

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate the reduction in pay of a Federal employee or District of 
 Columbia employee as a result of such employee serving as a member of 
the National Guard of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia National Guard 
Federal Employee Leave Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CREDITING AMOUNTS RECEIVED AGAINST PAY OF FEDERAL 
              EMPLOYEE OR D.C. EMPLOYEE SERVING AS A MEMBER OF THE 
              NATIONAL GUARD OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

     The amendment made by section 1109 of title XI of division A of 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022 (Public Law 
117-81) shall apply to any amounts credited, by operation of section 
5519 of title 5, United States Code, against the pay of an employee or 
individual described under section 6323(c) of such title during the 
period beginning on May 29, 2020, and ending on December 26, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AIJFTIN 
A 11OUl8. bo8tabli8hd by 8 8OfItraOtWbiOh 

waly OOflfW8 a ~itllya oi huntlnl; OS 

premia88 ot the ~antar elthou& the 

l d th8 tr8nnwOtion a l lmSO". 

-Butthowh th8 oontraot un4.r rrhisir Klbbia . 

holdr~ deaomlantw Stsol? l *18880* aad 

80 danamhater it i0 hi8 ~~tit%On, - 

00 

1 

ho all8etiOll8 Ot l QpOllU’8 ~titiOll t-t 

it 8, la raot only a pot30~U 110~~88 fo Xlbbla 

to caJoy tho &It8 &rant& hlr by it8 tUU, 

Md 18 in II0 8UISe ti tO@hliiOti l-8, a8 t&t 

taim i8 uad~atGOd.= 

6. tom of dcmwl4d~t for the 8i&a~tu?o ai 

th. lloea8or mbdtted for oar 4+otnl, to bo wed In 

tti qwll.r~Dtora$lon lioam*, la wti8saosoq. 

Trnstln8 that thlr touJ armelm your inqulryi n 

are 

APPROVID~T 20, 1939 

A?
#### EARP v. CITY OF DETROIT.

Appeal and Error — Pinal Judgment — Jurisdiction—Dismissal op Appeal Taken as op Right.

Summary judgment for 1 of 3 defendants *held,*not to be a final judgment appealable as of right where, trial court failed to make a determination that there was no just reason for delay and to make express direction for entry of judgment; ' the Court' of Appeals is without jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal (GCR 1963, 117.2[1], 518.2).

References for Points in Headnote

4 Am Jur 2d,-Appeal and Error §§ 50-64; 5 Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error § 908.

Appeal from Wayne; Bowles (George E.), J.

Submitted Division 1 June 5, 1968, at Detroit.

(Docket No. 4,250.)

Decided June 10, 1968.

Complaint by Richard Earp against City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, and the Detroit Police Department, and Michigan Bell Telephone Company, a Michigan corporation, for invasion of privacy, loss of employment, and ridicule. Summary judgment for defendant telephone company. Plaintiff appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

*Kelly, Greenstein & McCann,*for plaintiff.

*Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust é Kennedy (A. E. Williams*and *John L. Vanker,*of counsel), and *Alan R. Waterstone,*for Michigan Bell Telephone Company.

*660Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the order of the trial court granting defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company’s motion for summary judgment under GfCR 1963, 117.2(1). This is not a final judgment appealable as of right for the reason that GOB. 1963, 518.2 was not complied with. This Court is without jurisdiction and the appeal must be dismissed. *Fox*v. *Board of Regents of the University of Michigan*(1965), 375 Mich 238; and *Standard Building Products Company*v. *Woodland Building Company*(1965), 1 Mich App 434, 437.

(Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H. Gnus, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit
23.2




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









The Board
of Directors and Stockholders


Perficient,
Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-100490, No. 333-116549, No. 333-117216, No. 333-123177, No. 333-129054, No.
333-138602, No. 333-142267, No. 333-145899, No. 333-147687, No. 333-148978, and
333-152274) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-42626, No. 333-44854, No. 333-75666, No.
333-118839, No. 333-130624, and No. 333-147730) on Form S-8of
Perficient, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated March 5, 2009, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report
on Form 10-K of the Company.





Our
report refers to the Company’s adoption, effective January 1, 2006, of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment.








/s/ KPMG
LLP


St.
Louis, Missouri


March 5,
2009
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shabtai
Adlersberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                          | 
| | ------------------------ | 
| | Date: June
 24, 2008     | 
| |                          | 
| | /s/ SHABTAI
 ADLERSBERG  | 
| |                         
| | Shabtai
 Adlersberg     
| | Chief
 Executive Officer

---
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 99.2 Press Release



PRESS RELEASE
February 26, 1999             For further information contact:
                              David M. Bradley
                              Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                              North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                              825 Central Avenue
                              Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                              515-576-7531


               NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES DIVIDEND


David M. Bradley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of North
Central Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") announced today that the Company
declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share on the Company's
common stock for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1999. This amount is an
increase of 25% compared to the previous dividend rate. The dividend will be
payable to all stockholders of record as of March 16, 1999 and will be paid on
April 6, 1999.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central and southeastern Iowa at 7
full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington and Mount
Pleasant, Iowa through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank
of Iowa, headquartered in Fort Dodge, Iowa.  The Bank's deposits are insured by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.  The Company's stock is traded on The
Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "FFFD".
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
     1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Excalibur Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Matthew C. Flemming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Matthew C. Flemming
--------------------------------------------
Matthew C. Flemming, Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2003
Exhibit 31.01
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Move, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: November 9, 2009
    /s/ STEVEN H. BERKOWITZSteven H. BerkowitzChief Executive Officer 83
EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

To
the Board of Directors
Nextel Partners, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-78459, 333-39386, 333-48470 and 333-82440) on
Form S-4 and (Nos. 333-34724 and 333-99017) on Form S-8 of Nextel Partners, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Nextel Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Nextel Partners, Inc.

Our
report refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements to include the transitional disclosures required by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assetswhich was adopted by Nextel Partners, Inc. as of January 1, 2002
as more fully as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial
statements other than with respect to such disclosures.

/s/KPMG
LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 25, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### ASHLAND OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 160, Docket 30630.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 4, 1966.

Decided Nov. 9, 1966.

Arthur J. Maloney, Buffalo, N. Y., (Adams, Brown, Starrett & Maloney, Buffalo, N. Y.), for appellant.

George M. Gibson, Buffalo, N. Y. (Ohlin, Damon, Morey, Sawyer & Moot, Buffalo, N. Y.) (William S. Easton, Buffalo, N. Y., of Counsel), for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Being persuaded of the correctness of the result reached by the District Court and altogether convinced of our inability to do anything but produce further confusion on a matter of New York insurance law now quite sufficiently confused, contrast, e. g., Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. Phoenix of Hartford Ins. Co., 26 A.D.2d 627, 272 N.Y.S.2d 443 (2d Dept. 1966) (3-2 decision) with Continental Casualty Co. v. Duffy, 26 A.D.2d 630, 272 N.Y.S.2d 470 (2d Dept. 1966), we affirm the judgment for the reasons given by Judge Henderson and also on the authority of the later decided *Continental Casualty Co.*case.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mario ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51136 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mario Estrada, Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

*276PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Estrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF GASCO ENERGY, INC.
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350


         I, W. King Grant,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Gasco Energy,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify that the  accompanying
report on Form 10K for the period  ending  December  31, 2002 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a)
of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (the  "Report")  by the Company  fully
complies with the requirements of that section.

         I further certify that the  information  contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  operations  and results of
operations of the Company.




                                           /s/ W. King Grant
                                           -----------------------
                                    Name:  W. King Grant
                                    Date:  March 27, 2003
14425

#### WOFFORD *ET AL.*v. LAW

(189 S. E., 753)

*455
      *Mr. Donald Russell,*for appellant,

*Mr. Jesse W. Boyd,*for respondents,

*456February 1, 1937.

The opinion of the Court was delivered bjr

Mr. Justice Carter.

This case comes to this Court on appeal from an order of his Honor, Judge T. S. Sease, Circuit Judge, issued in the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg County, affirming the Master’s report in the cause.

In order that the case may be better understood, we quote herewith the following agreed statement appearing in the record: '

> “This is a statutory receivership proceeding against The Merchants and Farmers Bank of Spartanburg, S- C., filed December —•, 1931. The appeal is from a decree for payment by the receiver of rent in the sum of $1,050.00 for seven months, June to December, 1932, inclusive. The property was occupied by the bank and retained by the successive receivers. The bank’s rent was under a lease, and was paid up to the time the bank closed in December, 1931. The leased premises consisted of one half the building occupied by the bank. The first receiver was the First National Bank of Spartanburg, S. C., which retained occupancy of the premises and paid therefor $150.00 a month for the five months (January to May, 1932, inclusive) while it was receiver. On account of its closing in June, 1932, John A. Law, Jr., was appointed receiver in its stead. He continued occupancy of the premises until December 31st, 1932. No rent has been paid for this period, and the owners filed petition in the original proceeding seeking direction of the Court for payment of the same by receiver. The petition was referred to the Master, who took testimony and filed a report recommending payment of rent, $1,050.00. The receiver excepted to the Master’s Report, and the matter was heard and a decree rendered on July —, 1936, directing payment of rent.

> *457“Timely notice of intention to appeal from that decree was served.”

We are satisfied that the Circuit Judge reached'the proper conclusion in the case and for the reasons appearing in the decree issued by his Honor, it is the order of this Court that the judgment of the lower Court be, and is hereby, affirmed.

Note: Let the decree of his Honor, Judge T. S. Sease, be incorporated in the report of the case.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fisitburne concur.
#### Mary E. W. Field, as Executrix of Charles H. Wiltsie, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Dominick Stalica, Individually and as General Guardian of Joseph Stalica et al., Infants, et al., Defendants; Union Properties, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, and Village of Depew et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Submitted April 12, 1943;

decided April 22, 1943.

Motion for reargument on behalf of County of Erie denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 290 N. Y. 181.)