alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Wiggans, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Connetics
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ Thomas G. Wiggans
-------------------------------------
Thomas G. Wiggans
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Organoid Modeling of Neural Stimulants and HIV 
Comorbidity of Human Brain (R01-Clinical Trial Optional).
    Date: March 21, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian Stefan Wolff, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, 
MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 480-1448, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5436263d353a7a233b383232143a3d3c7a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2c3c272f206039212228280e20272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 18, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst. Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-04003 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Joel ESTRADA-FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51046 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 25, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Joel Estrada-Fernandez, Pro Se

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joel Estrada-Fernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Fernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment *395that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Notwithstanding that determination, we note a clerical error in the judgment. At sentencing, the district court agreed to recommend that Estrada-Fernandez be placed in a facility in Post, Texas. The judgment does not contain this recommendation.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. The case is REMANDED to the district court for the limited purpose of correcting a clerical error in the judgment. *See*Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of AudioCodes Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mike Lilo, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ MIKE LILO



Mike Lilo

Chief Operating Officer and

Chief Financial Officer





April 1, 2003
NUMBER 13-22-00122-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN RE MICHAEL LEE BRACEWELL

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On March 24, 2022, relator Michael Lee Bracewell filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus through which he asserts, in six issues, that the trial court abused its discretion 

by disqualifying relator’s counsel of record. Relator also filed a “Motion to Stay Underlying 

Proceedings” in which he requests that we stay the trial court proceedings pending 

resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the “Motion to Stay Underlying 

Proceedings,” is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion,

and we order the trial court proceedings to be stayed pending further order of this Court,
2

or until this case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Sally Marie Bracewell, or any 

others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to 

the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of 

this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of March, 2022.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Antonio De Jesus RAMIREZ-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11210 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 12, 2017

Timothy W. Funnell, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Antonio De Jesus Ramirez-Olvera, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

*330PER CURIAM: *

Antonio De Jesus Ramirez-Olvera appeals from the denial of a postconviction pleading’ in which he purported to reserve the right to challenge his conviction and sentence under *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct, 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015). Ramirez-Olvera, in essence, sought 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief. Thus, his pleading was an unauthorized • successive § 2255 motion that the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain, and he has appealed from the denial of a meaningless motion. *See United States v. Key,*205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000); *United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the’ court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-38926, 333-83321, 333-83325, 333-83327, 333-73664,
333-100003, 333-106057 and 333-106058 and Form S-3 No. 333-110389) of Art
Technology Group, Inc. and the related Prospectus of our report dated January
26, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Art Technology
Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 11, 2004
#### Oscar Jesus RODRIGUEZ-MORENO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-72272

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

Filed October 2, 2017

*493Erin Trusler Hall, Amanda L. Bhuket, Attorneys, Global Justice Law Group, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner

OIL, Lori Warlick, Trial Attorney, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Jesus Rodríguez-Moreno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

Rodriguez-Moreno’s contentions that the agency failed to consider his arguments on appeal, violated due process by mischarac-terizing or failing to consider evidence, and failed to conduct a future-oriented analysis are not supported by the record, and do not amount to colorable claims that would invoke jurisdiction over the agency’s hardship determination. *See Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder,*688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (absent a colorable legal or constitutional claim, the court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination regarding hardship); *Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,*424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“To be colorable in this context, ... the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation omitted)); *Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2000) (“[A]n alien attempting to establish that the Board violated his right to due process by failing to consider relevant evidence must overcome the presumption that it did review the evidence.”).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rodriguez-Moreno’s unexhausted contention that he was denied a full and fair hearing before the IJ. *See Tijani v. Holder,*628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Moses Flores, Plaintiff, v The Lower East Side Service Center, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. *460Procida Realty and Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 855]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered April 18, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment on its third-party action for indemnification and granted the cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since the damage plaintiff suffered to his right eye is not a “grave injury” under Workers’ Compensation Law § 11 *(see Ibarra v Equip. Control,*268 AD2d 13, 18 [2000]), defendant is unable to obtain indemnification from plaintiffs employer unless, prior to the accident, the parties entered into a written contract whereby the employer expressly agreed to contribute to or indemnify the claimant *(cf. Acosta v Green Mgt. Corp.,*267 AD2d 67 [1999]). It is undisputed that the contract defendant offered in support of its demand for indemnification was never signed. A contract that was not actually entered into before the occurrence of an accident is not available for indemnification against the employer, notwithstanding the latter’s supervision, direction and control of the work site and its general compliance with the terms of the unexecuted contract *(see Burke v Fisher Sixth Ave. Co.,*287 AD2d 410 [2001]; *Beckford v City of New York,*261 AD2d 158 [1999]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6574 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6574

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the contempt 
        authority of immigration judges, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2023

Mr. Gallagher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the contempt 
        authority of immigration judges, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Empowering Immigration Courts Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTEMPT AUTHORITY OF IMMIGRATION JUDGES.

    Section 240(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1229a(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``(under regulations prescribed by 
the Attorney General) to sanction by civil money penalty any action (or 
inaction) in contempt of the judge's proper exercise of authority under 
this Act'' and inserting ``to sanction by fine contempt of its 
authority in accordance with section 401 of title 18, United States 
Code''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 23.1      Letter from Areson & Company



March 30, 2001


The Board of Directors
Supply Chain Services Inc.
8/F., Guangdong Textile Centre
22 Minden Avenue
Tsimshatsui
Kowloon
Hong Kong



Dear Sirs,

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation in
this Form 10-KSB of our audit report dated March 19, 2001 on the consolidated
financial statements of Supply Chain Services Inc; formerly known as Paddington
Inc.; ("the Company") and its subsidiaries for the period from September 10,
1997 to December 31, 1998 and years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000. It should
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of Supply Chain
Services Inc. subsequent to December 31, 2000 or performed any audit procedures
subsequent to the date of our report.




ARESON & COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
D.J.M., JR., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/06-0349]

Notice is hereby given that Main Street Capital III, L.P., 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the “Act”), in connection with a financing involving small concern NuStep, LLC located at 511 Venture Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, provided notice of this transaction to the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) pursuant to the Regulations found at 13 CFR 107. The financing is brought within the purview of 13 CFR 107.730—Financings which constitute conflicts of interests, of the Regulations because NuStep, LLC is an Associate of Main Street Capital III, L.P. because Associate Main Street Equity Investment, Inc. owns a greater than ten percent interest in the NuStep, LLC.

This financing is pursuant to § 107.730 (f) of the Regulations because Main Street Capital III, L.P.'s parent corporation, Main Street Capital Corporation, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and received an exemption from the Securities and Exchange Commission for the transaction.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.

      ( print page 11495)    
U.S. Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-04229 Filed 2-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation

# SUMMARY:

Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC), is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of Article VI of the Bylaws of the FCSIC.

# DATES:

10:00 a.m., Wednesday, March 9, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the current operating status of the FCSIC, the public may only virtually observe the open portions of this meeting. If you would like to virtually observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit                         *FCSIC.gov*, select “News & Events,” and then select “Board Meetings.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and complete the described registration process.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

If you need more information or assistance for accessibility reasons, or if you have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Status:*                     Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*

## Portions Open to the Public

    - Approval of January 27, 2022, Minutes
    - Quarterly FCSIC Financial Reports
    - Quarterly Report on Insured Obligations
    - Quarterly Report on Annual Performance Plan
    - Annual Report on Investment Portfolio
    - Presentation of 2021 Audit Results

## Portions Closed to the Public

    - Quarterly Report on Insurance Risk
    - Executive Session of the FCSIC Board Audit Committee with the External Auditor

Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-04310 Filed 3-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P