alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6244 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6244

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, as the ``1st 
            Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT ANDRES ZERMENO POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, shall 
be known and designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 3.9

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        AMALGAMATED ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

         Amalgamated Entertainment Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is Amalgamated Entertainment, Inc.

         SECOND:  The following amendments were adopted by the Board of
Directors and persons owning in excess of 92% of the outstanding voting
securities of the Corporation, in the manner prescribed by Sections 141.228 and
242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and pursuant to an
Information Statement mailed to all stockholders of record on November 4, 1999:

              1.   Name The name of this corporation is MegaMedia Networks, Inc.

              4.   Number of Shares. The number of common shares this
                   Corporation shall be authorized to issue is 50,000,000 shares
                   of $0.01 par value common stock. The remaining provisions of
                   this paragraph shall remain the same.

Such amendments shall take effect on the date of filing of this Certificate of
Amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         THIRD:    This amendment does not provide for any exchange,
reclassification or cancellation of issued shares.

         FOURTH:   This amendment does effect a change in the stated capital of
the Corporation from $250,000 to $500,000.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Amalgamated Entertainment, Inc. has caused this
Certificate to be signed by William A. Mobley, Jr., its sole director, President
and Secretary, this 26th day of November, 1999.

                                       AMALGAMATED ENTERTAINMENT, INC.


                                       By:/s/   William A. Mobley, Jr.
                                          --------------------------------
                                          William A. Mobley, Jr.
                                          Sole Director, President and Secretary
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 LAMMOT J. DU PONT 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 

TO 

AMENDED AND RESTED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”) is dated as of May 21, 2012, by and between DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the “Company”), DF Property Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “LLC”), and Lammot J. du Pont (the “Executive”). 

A. The Company, the LLC and the Executive are parties to an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Original
Agreement”), dated as of October 27, 2011. 
 B. The parties desire to amend the Original Agreement to make
certain revisions to the definition of “Good Reason”. 
 Accordingly, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Section 6.5 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to remove clause (v) from the definition of “Good Reason”.

 2. Unless specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in effect.








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names as of the day and year first
above written. 
  

							
	DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark L. Wetzel

	Name:	 	Mark L. Wetzel
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	
	DF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC
		
	By:	 	 DuPont Fabros Technology, L.P.,
 its Managing Member

			
		 	By:	 	 DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.,
 its General Partner

				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Mark L. Wetzel

		 		 	Name:	 	Mark L. Wetzel
		 		 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	
	 /s/ Lammot J. du Pont

	Lammot J. du Pont
#### The Case of Israel Wadlin.

Where one returned as a grand juror was not present to hear the charge, he was sworn in the form prescribed, and then generally charged to aid the jury in their inquiries into any offences which had been before stated in detail to the jury in the charge of the Court.

I. WADIAN was duly returned as a grand juror for the present term; but by reason of a great flood, which had carried off many of the bridges in this county, he did not arrive at the Court until after the grand jury had been impanelled and charged, and had retired to their chamber. After some consultation upon the bench, he was sworn by order of the Court in the usual form; after which the chief justice very briefly charged him to aid the grand jury in their inquiries into any offences committed within the county, and cognizable by this Court, which had been stated in detail to the grand jury in the charge of the Court when they were impanelled ; *and he then joined his fellows.*
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the''Company'') on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ''Report''),I, Joseph Fuda, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,based on my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

| Date: February 29,    2008 | /s/ Joseph Fuda*                 |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Joseph    Fuda                   |
|                       | Chief    Executive Officer       |
|                       | (Principal    executive officer) |
|                       |                             |

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
#### Celsa RUELAS-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-73909

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*404Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed June 2, 2017

Anya McLean, McLean Law Firm PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Pétitioner

OIL, Virginia Lum, Attorney, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Celsa Ruelas-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to remand and dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a continuance and the denial of a motion to remand. *Vargas-Hernandez v. Gonzales,*497 F.3d 919, 923 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying for lack of good cause Ruelas-Rodriguez’s motion for a three-year continuance, where the basis for the motion remained merely a speculative possibility at the time of her final removal hearing. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; *Singh v. Holder,*638 F.3d 1264, 1274 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he IJ [is] not required to grant a continuance based on ... speculations.”).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ruelas-Rodriguez’s motion to remand where she failed to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought. *See Bhasin v. Gonzales,*423 F.3d 977, 984 (9th Cir. 2005) (an' applicant must generally show an individualized, rather than a generalized, risk of persecution to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum or withholding); *Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder,*600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant must establish it is more likely than not they would be tortured in the country of removal to establish prima facie eligibility for protection under the Convention Against Torture).

The record does not support Ruelas-Rodriguez’s contention that the BIA failed to provide sufficient reasoning for its conclusions or show proper consideration of relevant factors. *See Najmabadi v. Holder,*597 F.3d 983, 990-91 (9th Cir. 2010) (the BIA must “merely ... announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted” (citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX.31.1

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John T. Ruddy, Chief Executive Officer of Nanoscience Technologies, Inc. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed   this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of   Nanoscience
Technologies, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of our financial  reporting  internal  controls  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

                             Date: December 27, 2007

                              By: /s/ John T. Ruddy
                              -------------------------
                              Name:  JOHN T. RUDDY
                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
exhibit_4-16.htm










Exhibit 4.16


 


English summary of undertakings of Izhak Tamir toward the trustees of Orckit's note 


holders re: undertakings required by the Arrangement, dated February 20, 2012


 


Pursuant to the principles of the Arrangement, Mr. Tamir made the following undertakings towards the trustees of our note holders:


 



	
·

	
To participate in equity financing investments that take place by April 2, 2013, at least 10% of each such financing, up to an aggregate amount of $1.0 million, if the aggregate amount raised from other investors in such offerings is not less than $7.0 million.







 


The foregoing undertaking is subject to the Arrangement becoming effective, and to the following conditions: (i) Messrs. Tamir and Paneth continue to hold their current positions in us at the time of the investment (unless terminated voluntarily by Mr. Tamir or Mr. Paneth, as the case may be); (ii) no trustee of liquidator was appointed to administer our affairs at the time of the investment; and (iii) there is no third party shareholder that holds more than 25% of our outstanding shares at the time of the investment (which did not result from any such equity investments, unless the total of such equity investments exceeds $8.4 million).


 



	
·

	
To provide a subordinated loan to us prior to the Arrangement coming into effect in the amount of $200,000, which would be converted into ordinary shares in an equity offering, if such offering comes into effect, as part of the satisfaction of Mr. Tamir's commitment described in the preceding paragraph.







 



	
·

	
The monthly salary of Mr. Tamir will be reduced by 33% for the period between January 1, 2012 and October 2, 2013.
#### Stephen Krom et al., Appellants, *v.*John J. Levy, Respondent.

(Argued October 4, 1871;

decided January term, 1872.)

Action upon an account. Defendant set up a counterclaim for breach, on the part of plaintiffs, of a contract to plane and prepare a plate to print the backs of cards. Defendant was allowed to prove as damages the loss sustained by being deprived of the plate for several months in his business, and *680the referee allowed him such damages. *Held,*error within the rule laid down in *Blanchard*v. *Ely*(21 Wend., 342) and *Griffin*v. *Gol/oer*(16 N. Y., 489).

*A. O. Morris*for the appellants.

*j¥. B. Home*for the respondent.

Lott, Ch. C., and Earl, C., read for reversal.

All concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the''Company'') on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ''Report''),I, Dan Amadori, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,based on my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

| Date: February 29,    2008 | /s/ Dan Amadori*                    |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Dan Amadori                                                                                                                        |
|                       | Chief Financial    Officer                                                                                                         |
|                       | (Principal financial    officer)                                                                                                   |

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

----
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10.18c 
 AMENDMENT TO THE PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
LEADER’S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of
the 27th day of March, 2012, is made to the PSS World Medical, Inc. Amended and Leader’s Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). All defined terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of
Directors of PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan as provided below. 

1. 401(k) Plan Excess Deferrals. A new Section 5.13 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows: 

5.13 401(k) Plan Excess Deferrals. A Participant may elect to defer up to 100% of a refund of excess contributions from the 401(k)
plan of the Company received by such Participant during the same year, provided such election is in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Deferral Election Form. 
 2. Payment Dates for Termination Account. Section 5.08(a)(iv) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

(iv) Annual installment payments shall be for no less than two (2) and no more than twenty (20) annual installments (as indicated in the
Participant’s most recent effective Deferral Election Form). The initial annual installment payment shall be equal to the value of the Participant’s Account on the applicable Valuation Date divided by the number of remaining installments
to be paid (including the then-current installment payment). Thereafter, each subsequent annual installment payment shall be made in January of each subsequent year and in an amount equal to the value of the Participant’s Account as of December
31 of the preceding year divided by the total number of annual installment payments remaining to be paid (including the then-current annual installment payment). 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized representative on the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC
		
	By:	 	/s/ David D. Klarner
	Name: 	 	David D. Klarner
	Its:	 	Vice President and Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Gregory S. Wood,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K/A of Liberate Technologies;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and;

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|                                | By:      | /s/ GREGORY S.  WOOD                                     |
|--------------------------------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |     | Gregory S. Wood                                          |
| Date:  September 28, 2005 | * * | *Executive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----