alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Christopher GOINS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10015 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Christopher Goins, Pro Se

*897Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Christopher Goins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Goins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. .

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 29 9 . ROLANDAS MI LI NAVI CI US v . THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g a ju ry t ri al

, Ro l an d as M i l i n av i ci us w as co nv i ct ed o f t wo co u n t s each

o f m al i ce m

u rd er, fel o n y m

urd er, ag g rav a t e d a s s au l t, an d p o s s es s io n o f a fi rearm

d u ri n g th e co m

m i s s i o n o f a fel o ny

. Hi s co n v i ct i o ns were affi rm ed o n ap p eal

. See

Mi l i n a vi ci us v. S t a t e , 29 0 Ga. 3 7 4 (7 2 1 SE2 d 8 43 ) (2 0 12 ). In 2 0 18

, M i l i n av ici u s fi l ed

a p ro s e m o t i on seek i ng , am on g o t h er t h i n g s , co p i es o f t h e g ran d ju ry p ro ceed i n g s an d

t h e in d i ct m en t i n hi s cas e p u rs uan t t o t h e Geo rg ia Op en Reco rd s Act

. Th e t ri al co u rt

d i s m i s s ed t h e m o t i o n , an d M il i n av i ci u s t h en fi l ed t h e i n s t an t d i rect ap p eal

. Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n , t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l a t e ju ri s d ict i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n wh i ch a sen t en ce o f d eat h was i m p os ed or co u l d b e i m

p o s ed .” Ga.

Co n s t

. of 19 8 3

, A rt

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Be c a u s e a p en al t y o f d eat h can b e

i m p o s ed fo r t he cri m e of m al i ce m u rd er, ju ri s d i ct i o n i s p ro p er i n t he Su p rem e Co u rt

. See OCGA § 1 6 -5 -1 (a), ( e ) ( 1 ) ; N e a l v. S ta t e , 2 9 0 Ga. 5 6 3, 5 72 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 6 5 )
(2 0 1 2) (Hu n s t ei n, C. J

., co n cu rri n g ). Th e Su p rem e Co u rt ’ s j u ri s d i ct i o n o v er m u rd er

cas es i n cl u d es ap p eal s fro m o rd er s r e s o l v i n g po s t-ju d g m en t m o t i o n s in su ch cas es

. See S imp s o n v. S t at e , 2 9 2 Ga. 7 6 4 , 7 6 4 -7 6 5 (7 4 0 SE2 d 1 2 4 ) (2 0 1 3 ). February 01, 2019Acco rd i ng l y , M i l in av i ci u s ’ s ap p e a l is he r e b y T R A N SFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e

Co u rt fo r d i s po s it i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/01/2019
#### Reginald Underwood FULLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA YADKIN COUNTY; Director Bureau of ATF, ADCE; North Carolina Department of Correction/NCPS; North Carolina General Assembly; Superior Court of Forsyth County; United States Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7746

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

Reginald U. Fullard, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Underwood Fullard appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Fullard seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. *See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,*807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); *Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant To  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Annual Report of eCollege.com (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Oakleigh Thorne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Reid Simpson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/OAKLEIGH THORNEOakleigh Thorne
Chief Executive Officer
August 24, 2004 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/REID SIMPSONReid Simpson
Chief Financial Officer
August 24, 2004       | 

In
accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, the above certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or other wise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company explicitly incorporates it by reference.



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of GREM USA (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: MARCH 30, 2007              /S/ EDWARD MIERS
       --------------              ----------------
                                       Edward Miers
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Principal Accounting Officer
#### Willard Divoll, Respondent, *v.*Henry Henken, Appellant.

(Argued September 28, 1871;

decided January term, 1872.)

The complaint in this action alleged an agreement on the part of defendant to pay plaintiff a commission of two and a half per cent upon a purchase price, for procuring a purchaser for defendant’s farm, which plaintiff did. Hpon the trial, the evidence, received without objection, showed an agreement to pay the commission upon the price of the property sold. This included a large amount of personal property as well as the farm. There was no suggestion upon the trial of variance between the evidence and the complaint. Plaintiff recovered the per centage upon the whole sale. Held, the objection could not be raised upon appeal, and if raised upon the trial it would have been the duty of the referee to have amended the complaint.

*673
      *Scrnwel Hand*for the appellant.

*Ira H. Tuthill*for the Respondent.

Leonard and Earl, CO., read for affirmance.

All concur, Lott, Oh. 0., not sitting. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Order entered May 6, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00409
- CV TIM REED, Appellant

V. ADAMS GOLF, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 00494
- 2013



### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s April 25, 2013 sealed emergency motion for stay of temporary injunction pending appeal

. The Court requests that appellee file any response to the motion by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, May 1 0 , 2013.

/s/ KERR Y P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of E.J.V., a child * From the 70th District Court

 of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. A-3534-PC

No. 11-21-00041-CV * September 9, 2021

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2221

___________

Jesse Garcia, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Marty C. Anderson, Warden; *

Dr. T. Tran; Dr. S. Stanton; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Jane Doe; and John Doe, sued *

in their individual/official capacities, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 2, 2010

Filed: November 17, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Jesse Garcia appeals following the district court’s1

 adverse grant

of summary judgment in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act.
-2-

Having conducted de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was

warranted. See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 559 F.3d 880, 884-85 (8th Cir.

2009) (summary judgment standard of review); see also Melford Olsen Honey, Inc.

v. Adee, 452 F.3d 956, 966 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing de novo district court’s

application of state law). We also find no abuse of discretion in the denial of Garcia’s

motion to alter or amend judgment. See Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan, 462 F.3d

913, 920 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit 21.01
 Subsidiaries of Move, Inc.
 State or Jurisdictionof Incorporation orFull Name of Entity
    
    Other Legal Names
    
    Legal Status of Entity
    
    OrganizationHomeBuilder.com (Delaware), Inc.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareHomestore Europe Corporation
    
    None
    
    British Virgin Islands Co.
    
    British Virgin IslandsHomestore International Limited (BVI)
    
    None
    
    British Virgin Islands Co.
    
    British Virgin IslandsMove Sales, Inc.
    
    Move Sales, Inc.
dba Move
 Los Angeles / Ventura
County
 Minnesota
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareMove Sales, Inc.
dba Rentnet
 Los Angeles County, CAMove Sales, Inc.
dba Homestore.com
 Los Angeles County, CAMove Sales, Inc.
dba Homestore Apartments and
Rentals
 Los Angeles County, CAMoving.com, Inc.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareImmoclick Online S.A.
    
    None
    
    Spanish Company
    
    SpainNational New Homes
Co., Inc.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareRealSelect, Inc.
    
    RealSelect, Inc.,
dba REALTOR.com®
 Los Angeles
County, CA
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareThe Enterprise of America, Ltd.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    WisconsinHomestore, Inc.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    DelawareTop Producer Systems Company
    
    None
    
    Nova Scotia, Canada ULL
corporation
    
    Nova ScotiaWelcome Wagon International Inc.
    
    None
    
    Corporation
    
    New York
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM WATERMARC FOOD MANAGEMENT CO. FORM 10-Q FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF FISCAL
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                         197,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  249,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,971,462
<PP&E>                                       5,068,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                 496,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,783,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,350,406
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    329,540
<COMMON>                                       713,161
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,014,427)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,783,675
<SALES>                                     10,138,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,138,939
<CGS>                                        3,113,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,235,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             296,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (347,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (347,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (347,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL 1 

CAUSE NO. 2014-01360 

SARAH T. HARRIS, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

 § 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant § 

 § 

vs. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

 § 

JOHN W. HANKINS, § 

 § 

 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff § 333RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1, John W. Hankins (“Hankins”), Defendant and CounterPlaintiff in the above-numbered and styled cause, files this his Notice of Appeal to either the 

First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston, Texas. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Hankins 

desires to appeal from the Order Granting Final Summary Judgment rendered in favor of 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Sarah T. Harris and against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Hankins by 

the 333rd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, on March 26, 2015. 

This Notice is timely because it has been filed within thirty days of the date the judgment 

was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. 

Dated: April 24, 2015. 

Respectfully submitted, 

WILSON, CRIBBS & GOREN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Brian B. Kilpatrick 

Brian B. Kilpatrick, TBN 24074533 

Email: bkilpatrick@wcglaw.net 

H. Fred Cook, TBN 04732500 

Email: hfcook@wcglaw.net 

2500 Fannin Street 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone (713) 222-9000 

Facsimile (713) 229-8824 

4/24/2015 4:55:29 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 5030802

By: Phyllis Washington

Filed: 4/24/2015 4:55:29 PM

ACCEPTED

01-15-00396-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/29/2015 10:07:40 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/29/2015 10:07:40 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL 2 

HUGHES ELLZEY, L.L.P. 

Jarrett L. Ellzey, TBN 24040864 

Email: jarrett@hughesellzey.com 

W. Craft Hughes, TBN 24046123 

Email: craft@hughesellzey.com 

Galleria Tower I 

2700 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1120 

Houston, Texas 77056 

Phone (713) 554-2377 

Facsimile (888) 995-3335 

ATTORNEYS FOR JOHN W. HANKINS, 

DEFENDANT & COUNTERPLAINTIFF 

 
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on April 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon the following parties in accordance with Rule 21(a) of the TEXAS RULES OF 

CIVIL PROCEDURE: 

 

Via Efile 

Michael J. Mazzone 

Mike Powell 

Robert A. Carlton 

1221 McKinney, Suite 2100 

Houston, Texas 77010-2007 

Telephone (713) 547-2115 

Telecopier (713) 236-5662 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

Via Efile 

Hartley Hampton 

Hampton & King 

3 Riverway, Suite 910 

Houston, TX 77056 

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

 /s/ Brian B. Kilpatrick 

 Brian B. Kilpatrick
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Alfred Haynes, Appellant.

Argued April 15, 1943;

decided May 27, 1943.

*823
      *Julian V. Carabba, Ralph J. Barra*and *Samuel Goldstein*for appellant.

*Thomas Cradock Hughes, Acting District Attorney (Henry J. Walsh*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Taking no part: Finch, J.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4237-4238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01812]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice of Open Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee 
of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM).

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 24, 2022, from 2:00 p.m.-4:00 p.m. 
EDT.

PLACE: The meeting will be held virtually.

[[Page 4238]]


STATUS: Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation and time will be allotted for questions or comments 
submitted online. Members of the public may also file written 
statements before or after the meeting to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#82e7faf6e7f0ece3eec2e7faebeface5edf4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5b464a5b4c505f527e5b46575310595148">[email protected]</span></a>. Interested 
parties may register for the meeting at https://teams.microsoft.com/registration/PAFTuZHHMk2Zb1GDkIVFJw,5M1LfonJMEi2VFUgYRv6oQ,i145n2l9vkmDj5btNlkuGw,x0C4PsIxqEe3e1J4MkfX9A,PdrWkxBplEaPp-Y8sXyvBg,4YXl84_USEajrqMjPef8Gw?mode=read&tenantId=b953013c-c791-4d32-996f-518390854527.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Discussion of EXIM policies and programs 
designed to support the expansion of financing support for U.S. 
manufactured goods and services in Sub-Saharan Africa.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, contact 
India Walker, External Engagement Specialist at 202-480-0062.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01812 Filed 1-25-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901
 

DEC 1 8 2009 

Stephen B. Etsitty, Executive Director 

Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency 

P.O. Box 339 

Window Rock, Arizona 86515 

Re: Extension Consultation on Advanced Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (ANPR) concerning Best Available Retrofit Technology 

(BART) determination for Navajo Generating Station, EPA Docket No. 

EPA-R09-0AR-2009-0598 (74 Fed. Reg. 44313; August 28, 2009) 

DearM~~ty: 2~

EPA met with the tribes of ITCA on December 15, 2009, to discuss our 

ANPR on the BART determination for Navajo Generating Station to hear directly 

the concerns of tribes about this issue. We understand that representatives of the 

Navajo Nation were unable to attend this meeting. Therefore, we are writing you 

to inform you that in this meeting, EPA agreed to extend the comment period for 

all tribes potentially affected by our future BART determination from December 

28, 2009, until March 1, 2010, to provide more time for government-togovernment consultation. Please note that only tribes will be eligible to submit 

comments during this informal extension. 

We appreciate your interest in our action and look forward to consulting 

with you throughout our rulemaking process. Please contact me at 520-498-0118 

if you have additional questions. 

Sincerely, 

Colleen McKaughan 

Associate Director, Air Division 

Printed on Recycled Paper
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0804 SAT Date: 9/3/2014 Print Date: 2/3/2015

Related cases : CBI : Yes Health related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: HYPERSENS (UNCERT); AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0804 FATE: Solid with MP = Dec. 1166 C (M) S = 1.4 g/L at 25 C (M) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate PBT Potential: P3B1*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed from the skin, good absorption from the lung and GI tract ( p che m ). Uncertain concern for hypersensitivity based on the .

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 34.6
daphnid 48-h LC50 19.4
green algal 96-h EC50 0.123

fish

_ chronic value 3.5
daphnid

_ chronic value 1.9
algal

_ chronic value 0.042

. Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for compounds and with MW adjustments; SAR chemical class = ; solid with mp idneitfied as decomposes at 403.7 C (P); S = 1400 mg/L @ 20 C (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 4

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916