alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael J. Lyftogt, Vice President, Finance, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Christopher & Banks Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q****for the period ended November 27, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: January 6, 2011 |     |                                                                                      |
|----------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |     |                                                                                      |
|                       | By:      | /s/ Michael J. Lyftogt                                                                    |
|                       |     | Michael J. Lyftogt                                                                        |
|                       | * * | *Vice President, Finance,**Chief Accounting Officer and**Interim Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           3,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,079
<PP&E>                                         184,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,186
<SALES>                                        375,470
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               375,470
<CGS>                                          332,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6115 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6115

 To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to evacuation 
  of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by war or 
                           acts of terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2023

    Mr. Dunn of Florida (for himself, Mr. Mills, and Mr. Moskowitz) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the waiver of costs of activities relating to evacuation 
  of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by war or 
                           acts of terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF COSTS OF ACTIVITIES RELATING TO EVACUATION OF 
              UNITED STATES CITIZENS WHEN THEIR LIVES ARE ENDANGERED BY 
              WAR OR ACTS OF TERRORISM.

    Section 4 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2671) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) With regard to the repatriations loan program, the Secretary 
of State is authorized to waive the costs of activities relating to 
evacuation of United States citizens when their lives are endangered by 
war or acts of terrorism.''.
                                 <all>
```
Byron Burrows Comments to EPA’s Proposed Transport Rule 

Chicago, IL, Hearing on 8/19/2020 

My name is Byron Burrows, Manager of Air Programs with Tampa Electric 

Company (TEC). Tampa Electric is a mid-sized utility located in Florida 

with a balanced fuel mix of half coal and half natural gas. TEC has just 

completed a $1.2 billion initiative to reduce emissions. We have reduced 

system-wide SO2 and NOx emissions each by 90% from 1998 levels. 

TEC supports EPA’s preferred approach, which allows limited interstate 

trading among power plants but assures that each state will meet its 

pollution control obligations. We believe this approach results in a 

reasonable approach to meeting reduction goals and minimizes the cost 

increase for power - unless the allocations are too restrictive to allow 

market dynamics to occur. 

o The 1st alternative, “intra-state trading only” is unfavorable for 

our customers because it unnecessarily limits the trading 

market and the ability to achieve the lowest cost reductions and 

would cause unnecessary increases in the cost of electricity at 

a time when we can least afford it. 

o The 2nd alternative is even more detrimental because it further 

reduces compliance flexibility and ignores the highly successful 

market-based system of emission reduction. This option 

intuitively results in higher overall compliance costs without 

guaranteeing any additional environmental benefit. 

The proposed allocation method penalizes companies like TEC that made 

early commitments to reduce emissions. TEC has been a leader in making 

emission reductions (making a 90% system-wide reduction in SO2 & NOx 

over 1998 levels), yet the proposal does not provide TEC with sufficient 

SO2 allowances to even operate within our current permit limits. It is 

important for EPA to avoid penalizing early action. TEC will propose 

options to accomplish this in our written comments (which may include 

some of the alternatives identified in EPA’s proposal). Good faith efforts 

like TEC’s, to reduce emissions beyond minimum requirements have been 

ignored by EPA in the default proposal, setting a troubling precedent. 

We encourage EPA to consider allocation methods that do not penalize 

those who have made early emission reductions.
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>


                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Luna Technologies International
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kimberly
Landry, the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

Date:  April 15, 2005
                                 By: /s/ Kimberly Landry
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Kimberly Landry, Chief  Executive Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0548 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-008-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: CF-2012-31R1

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### ALABAMA GRAVEL COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL ACCEPTANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 22797.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1966.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 30, 1967.

Robert McD. Smith, William G. Som-erville, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel, for appellants.

Morris K. Sirote, Sirote, Permutt, Friend & Friedman, Birmingham, Ala., Greenberger, Krauss & Jacobs, Michael Wm. Zavis, Richard F. Broude, A. Bruce Schimberg, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

*407Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully considered the record and findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court in this diversity case. The appellant complains of the determination by the trial court that all of the activities in the State of Alabama of the appellee, a nationally active factoring company were incidental to, and a part of a purely interstate transaction. We conclude that the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and agree with the trial court that on the facts thus found, the conclusions were correct.

The findings relative to a reasonable attorneys fee were amply supported.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q ), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
 Date: August 5, 2005
    
    /s/ Thomas G. WiggansThomas G. WiggansChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
NaviSite, Inc.:

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
Nos. 333-112087 on Form S-2, 333-123114 and 333-117543 on Form S-3, 333-117545,
333-111165, 333-89987, 333-67786, 333-67774, 333-56454, 333-56452 and 333-56478
on Form S-8 of NaviSite, Inc. of our report dated October 28, 2005, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of NaviSite, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July
31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in
the three-year period ended July 31, 2005, and our report dated October 28, 2005
relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports are
included in the July 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaviSite, Inc.

      The reports of KPMG LLP on the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule contain an explanatory paragraph
that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations since
inception and has an accumulated deficit, as well as other factors, that raise
substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>



                                  CERTIFICATION

     In  connection  with the Annual Report of Luna  Technologies  International
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  we, Kimberly Landry,  the Chief Executive Officer and Brian Fiddler,
the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

Date:  March 30, 2004
                                 By: /s/ Kimberly Landry
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Kimberly Landry, Chief  Executive Officer


                                   /s/ Brian Fiddler
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Brian Fiddler, Principal Financial Officer
KENDALL PROPERTIES AND INVESTMENTS, Appellant, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### ALAPA and NUUTOFIA, Plaintiffs v. UO SOPOAGA, Defendant

No. 17-1907

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Land: “Lalolama” or “Leusi” near Puapua]

August 30, 1907

Present: E. W. GURR, *Senior Member,*and MAUGA, Associate *Member*

DECISION

This is a claim to a section of land inland of Leone, and being part of an old settlement known as “Puapua”. The Plaintiffs call the land “Lalolama” but the Defendant styles it “Leusi”. Defendant claims the land in .trust for his wife and children.

Plaintiffs have relied upon the evidence of Samana and Fiu in support of their claim, but from a personal observation made by the Court, the land which both these witnesses have been cultivating is outside of the land now claimed by the defendant, who had on a previous occasion surveyed the property under cultivation by Samana and Fiu, as shown on the plan marked “A”. But the defendant does not now claim that land. The cultivations on the land as marked out, according to plan “B” are the result of the energies of the defendant and his family, except an irregular row of young cocoanuts which was planted by the plaintiff Alapa two years ago when a dispute arose between him and Uo Sopoaga, defendant about the ownership of the property. The weight of the testimony is in favor of .the defendant. Even the witnesses called on behalf of the plain*155tiffs prove that the previous owners of the land from whom the defendant derives title, cultivated the land. It is considered by the Court that the land described in the plat marked “B” and produced by the defendant is the land of Uo Sopoaga, in trust for his wife Vea and her children, and let a decree issue accordingly.

Costs to be paid by plaintiffs.
S c o t t E v e l d

A e r i a l I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g i e s

M e n i f e e

, C A 9 2 5 8 5

( 9 5 1 ) 2 4 9

­ 4 5 3 0

D o c k e t # F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 0 1 5 3

­ 0 0 0 1

I n r e s p o n s e t o r e q u i r e m e n t s t o c o m p l y 1 1

. 8 1

P l e a s e a t t a c h t o D o c k e t F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 0 1 5 3



### 1

. P e r s o n n e l S a f e t y

a

. C a p i t a l a s s e t s

, s u c h a s q u a r r i e s

, d a m s

, p i p e l i n e s

, a n d b r i d g e s o f t e n t i m e s s p a n o v e r a r e a s

w h e r e t e r r a i n i s u n s t a b l e

, v e r t i c a l

, o r s i m p l y t o o d a n g e r o u s f o r f o o t t r a v e l

. F i e l d i n s p e c t i o n s

l e a v e e m p l o y e e s v u l n e r a b l e t o e n v i r o n m e n t a l h a z a r d s s u c h a s s t r e a m c r o s s i n g

, s e a s o n a l

w a t e r r u n o f f

, r i s k o f f a l l s a n d b l o c k e d p a t h s ; b i o l o g i c a l h a z a r d s

, s u c h a s s n a k e s

, a n d n a t u r a l

p r e d a t o r s ; a n d e x t r e m e t e m p e r a t u r e c h a n g e s w h i c h m a y c a u s e a l t i t u d e s i c k n e s s

, o r h e a t

s t r o k e

. T h e u t i l i z a t i o n o f o u r U A V w i l l e n s u r e a c c e s s t o t h e s e a r e a s w h i l e m i n i m i z i n g r i s k o f

s e r i o u s i n j u r y o r i s s u e t o p e r s o n n e l a s s i g n e d t o c o n d u c t t h e s e s u r v e y s

.



### 2

. A c c e s s t o r e m o t e o r i m p a s s a b l e a r e a s

a

. S e g m e n t s o f q u a r r i e s

, d a m s

, p i p e l i n e s

, a n d b r i d g e s m a y c u r r e n t l y b e o r b e c o m e

u n r e a c h a b l e

, p a r t i a l l y o b s c u r e d

, o r i m p r a c t i c a b l e f o r i n s p e c t i o n b y c o n v e n t i o n a l m e a n s

, s u c h

a s p h y s i c a l l y w a l k i n g t h e l i n e

, o r u t i l i z i n g a i r p l a n e o r h e l i c o p t e r s f o r i n s p e c t i o n s

. A c c e s s t o

a s s e t s c a n a l s o b e p a r t i a l l y o r c o m p l e t e l y b l o c k e d b y e n v i r o n m e n t a l s i n g u l a r i t i e s

, s u c h a s

s t o r m e v e n t s

, f e l l e d t r e e s

, o r v e g e t a t i o n g r o w t h

, o r b l o c k e d b y m e c h a n i c a l m e a n s s u c h a s

v e h i c l e a c c i d e n t s

, n e w c o n s t r u c t i o n

, o r r o a d m a i n t e n a n c e

. T h e u s e o f o u r U A V w i l l e n s u r e

a c c e s s t o r e m o t e o r i m p a s s a b l e a r e a s o n a n a s

­ n e e d e d b a s i s a s w e l l a s d u r i n g o r a f t e r

u n c o n t r o l l e d s i n g u l a r e v e n t s

.



### 3

. P r o t e c t i o n o f n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s

T h e u s e o f U A V ’ s a l o n g w i t h N I R ( n e a r i n f r a r e d ) p h o t o g r a p h y m a k e i t p o s s i b l e t o q u i c k l y a n d

e f f i c i e n t l y m o n i t o r t h e u s e a n d p o s s i b l e l o s s o f w a t e r t o c r o p s d u e t o o v e r s a t u r a t i o n

, t h e r e b y

i n c r e a s i n g e f

f i c i e n c y o f w a t e r u s e a s w e l l a s i n c r e a s i n g c r o p y i e l d

.
**EXHIBIT - 32.3**

MOSSIMO, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofMossimo, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter period ended June 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I Vicken Festekjian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of myknowledge:

(1)              The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit -32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| /s/    | Vicken  Festekjian       |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Vicken  Festekjian       |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |
|   | August 14, 2006          |

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTENSTATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEENPROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TOTHE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF UPON REQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES THE FORM10-Q TO WHICH IT RELATES, IS NOT DEEMED FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION AND IS NOT TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO A FILING OF THECOMPANY UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 (WHETHERMADE BEFORE OR AFTER THE DATE OF THE FORM 10-Q), IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY GENERALINCORPORATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN SUCH FILING.

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David FLORES-OCHOA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41061 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

Tracey M. Batson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

David Flores-Ochoa, Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent David Flores-Ochoa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Ochoa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.