alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Chantal Bourgeat, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A of Wavecom SA;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986]

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:
        November 8, 2005 |  | /s/
        CHANTAL BOURGEAT                                                 
|------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                               |  | Chantal
        Bourgeat,
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Wavecom SA
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Miguel PEDRO-FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40781 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 24, 2017

Eileen K Wilson, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jorge Miguel Pedro-Fernandez, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Miguel Pedro-Fernandez appeals his jury conviction for one count of conspiring to transport undocumented aliens within the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(I), and (a)(l)(B)(i) and two counts of transporting undocumented aliens within the United States in violation of § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii), (a)(l)(A)(v)(II), and (a)(l)(B)(i). Pedro-Fernandez argues that the magistrate judge abused his discretion during the voir dire when he denied Pedro-Fernandez’s requests to play an excerpt from the movie, “My Cousin Vinny,” and to present a Power Point presentation on the elements of the transportation offense with which he was charged.

We will not disturb the scope and content of voir dire unless abuse of discretion and prejudice are shown. *United States v. Cervantes,*706 F.3d 603, 613 (5th Cir. 2013). Pedro-Fernandez has not made the requisite showing, as the magistrate judge’s questions about the prospective jurors’ ability to be impartial and follow the law on which the trial court would instruct them, together with Pedro-Fernandez’s questions and comments, provided defense counsel ample opportunity to exercise a reasonably knowledgeable right of challenge to the prospective jurors. *See id.; see*
      *361
      *also United States v. Harper,*527 F.3d 396, 409-10 (5th Cir. 2008).

Pedro-Fernandez also argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to perfect the record by proffering an exhibit that was ruled inadmissible. Because the record is not sufficiently developed, we will not adjudicate Pedro-Fernandez’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. *See United States v. Isgar,*739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); *United States v. McPhail,*No. 92-7559, 1994 WL 121700, at *3 (5th Cir. March 22, 1994) (unpublished).

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan ZARATE-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41227 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

*266Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Zarate-Ramirez, Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Zarate-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Za-rate-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Leola BREE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 18356.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1966.

*117Leola Bree, Chicago, 111., submitted typewritten letter pro se without oral argument.

Deene R. Goodlaw, Atty., Tax Division, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent. Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, Attys., Tax Division, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., were with her on the brief.

Before VAN OOSTERHOUT and GIBSON, Circuit Judges, and NICHOL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Taxpayer Leola Bree has filed a timely petition for review of the order and decision of the Tax Court dismissing her petition for redetermination of the deficiency in her 1959 income tax and determining the amount of such deficiency to be $98.48, the amount previously determined to be due by the Commissioner.

Taxpayer’s petition for redetermination was filed with the Tax Court on December 19, 1962. Hearing thereon was set at St. Paul for June 1, 1964, and timely notice thereof given taxpayer. On May 27, 1964, taxpayer advised Government counsel that she was unable to attend the hearing and she requested that a lawyer be appointed to represent her. She was told that this could not be done and that unless she appeared the Government would move for dismissal for want of prosecution.

The case was continued. Thereafter, by stipulation between the taxpayer and the Commissioner, the place of trial was changed to Chicago, taxpayer’s then residence. On March 4, 1965, hearing was set for June 7, 1965, at Chicago and notice thereof was sent to taxpayer. When the taxpayer’s case was called on calendar on June 9, 1965, she failed to appear and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. Order was entered determining the deficiency in income tax due for 1959 in the amount of $98.48.

Taxpayer has not appeared here for oral argument nor has she by brief or any other manner sought to demonstrate that the Tax Court abused its discretion in dismissing her petition and determining the deficiency. Our Rules 11(e) and 13(e) would warrant a dismissal of the appeal.

We have carefully examined the record submitted by the Tax Court and we are convinced that the Tax Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the petition and in ordering the deficiency. See 26 U.S.C.A. § 7459(d); Tax Court Rules of Practice 27(c) (3); Visceglia v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 311 F.2d 946; Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 300 *118F.2d 760; see also Janousek v. French, 8 Cir., 287 F.2d 616.

The decision and order of the Tax Court are affirmed.
#### Mary Ester HARDESTY et al., Appellants, v. Jerry BROWNLEE et al., Appellees.

No. 22986.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1966.

Charles F. Baldwin, Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.

S. G. Johndroe, Jr., Leo Ferris, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The case on appeal was properly dismissed by the district court for lack of jurisdiction. Its order of dismissal is

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64363-64364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25841]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Wednesday, October 29, 2014, 3 p.m. EDT.

Place: Broadcasting Board of Governors, Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20237.

Subject: Notice of Closed Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of 
Governors.
Summary: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will 
meet in a special session to further discuss and consider the Fiscal 
Year 2016 budget. According to Office of

[[Page 64364]]

Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Section 22.1, all agency 
budgetary materials and data are considered confidential prior to the 
President submitting a budget to Congress. In accordance with section 
22.5 of Circular A-11, the BBG has determined that its meeting should 
be closed to public observation pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). In 
accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act and BBG policies, 
the meeting will be recorded and a transcript of the proceedings, 
subject to the redaction of information protected by 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B), will be made available to the public. The publicly-
releasable transcript will be available for download at www.bbg.gov 
within 21 days of the date of the meeting.
    Information regarding member votes to close the meeting and 
expected attendees can also be found on the Agency's public Web site.

Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Director of Board Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-25841 Filed 10-27-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
**SPAR Group, Inc.**

 

EXHIBIT 32.1

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 (this “report”), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the “registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.         The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.         The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

 

|   | /s/ Gary S. RaymondGary S. RaymondPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

Ex-3
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6553 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6553

To require the waiver of costs of activities relating to the evacuation 
  of United States citizens endangered by acts of terrorism or war in 
     Israel instigated by Hamas and other Islamist militant groups.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2023

Mr. Magaziner (for himself, Mr. Lawler, Ms. Balint, Ms. Lois Frankel of 
  Florida, Mr. Gottheimer, Mr. Landsman, Ms. Manning, Mr. Nadler, Mr. 
Schiff, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, and Ms. Lee of 
   Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the waiver of costs of activities relating to the evacuation 
  of United States citizens endangered by acts of terrorism or war in 
     Israel instigated by Hamas and other Islamist militant groups.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF COSTS OF ACTIVITIES RELATING TO EVACUATION OF 
              UNITED STATES CITIZENS ENDANGERED BY ACTS OF TERRORISM OR 
              WAR IN ISRAEL INSTIGATED BY HAMAS AND OTHER ISLAMIST 
              MILITANT GROUPS.

    Section 4 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 
U.S.C. 2671) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) With regard to the repatriations loan program, the Secretary 
of State shall waive the costs of activities related to the evacuation 
of United States citizens endangered by acts of terrorism or war in 
Israel instigated by Hamas and other Islamist militant groups on 
October 7, 2023, through November 17, 2023, to include the evacuation 
of United States citizens on United States Government-coordinated 
transport, from Israel, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and affected 
countries, including Cyprus.''.
                                 <all>
```
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 4 - 0 180 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. BRANDON LEE CRAFT ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including July 2 6 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 13 2024

06/13/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0180
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,580
<SECURITIES>                                    54,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,648
<PP&E>                                           4,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,266
<OTHER-SE>                                    (75,646)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,990
<SALES>                                          9,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,753
<CGS>                                            1,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    981
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       981
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          52,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,905
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          14,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,498
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,445
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3,186)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,481)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,003)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,767
<SECURITIES>                                     8,373
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,170
<PP&E>                                           3,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,316
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,650
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,839
<SALES>                                          2,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,006
<CGS>                                              332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Curtis J. Parker                                
|                   |  |     |  | Curtis J. Parker                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer