OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable **Robert** D. **Pen?** County Attorney Reeve8 County **Peoor** , Texar

**Dear sat** 

OS River and flat0 the vaterr 0r the ed underArtlole

r Control Dlrtrlct

**“ Sub-&.**  1. The Board of Mreotorr of ruoh Dlstriotr rim11 Wve uul 8r8 hereby olothedrith the povec 

### and

l thorltf to aAopt 8nd promulgate 811 such remomble awl.8 uul regu~tlonr l8 me deemed neaerrary for pnsbrvlng the unitary aondition of all uatem oontrollbdby the Di@trlct, to prevent veto or v8tar, or the wmthorired weHonorable Robert D. Penn, Page 2

thereof, t6 regulaterorldence,boating and campIizg and all rroreatlonaland busInes8prlvilrger upon any body of vater, and any bod7 of land ovned

or controlledby such DIstrIct.s,....etc.
“Sub-seo.2. Providesa punishmentby a fiae not to exceed #lOO.OO or ImprI8onmentIn th8 oounty jail not to exceed 

### 30 da78 or both such fIn8 and Imprlsomwnt 

### for the violationof auah 

### rulesand regulationsafter due promlgatlon thereof.
“The Districthas promulgatedosrtainrule8 and regulationsin oomplianaevlth the procrdure outlined In Sub-sea. 2 of said Artlole 

### 7652a.
“Certain flshsrmanIn trying to circumvent these rules and regulations, go into Hev Xexiioo, plaoe their boats in the river and float dwn the river Into the vaters of the lake, aatah their fish and go baok up the river Into Hew NexIoo and dlsembark. At no time do they get off,thevater of the lake onto the land adjaaen$ theretovhieh I8 wned and controlledby thr Dlstrlot.
“The question InvolvedIs: Can th88e fishermen be prosecuted~under &tie18 

### 76f$!a,

of the Bevlsrd Civil Statutea for violating th8 rule8 and regulations a8 promulgatedby the Dlstrlotunder these cIraumH.ancea?”

We interpretyour request to bet Ssy the Board of Directors of the Dlstrlotpromulgaterules aad regulations vhIch mrry

form the basis for a crImlnalprorecutlon? Therefore, In thla opinion ve are not attempt- to pass upon the valIdit or the rules and regulationsas promulgatedby the Dlstrlot, but are only passing upon the queatlon of 

### vhetherrule8 and regulationspromulgatedbr the Dlstrlet, othervisevalid aa7 be made the basis of 

### oriminal proseoutionunder J&la18 ‘&a, Vernon’8Civil Statutes.

The Constitutiono? T8xas, &tIole 

### 16, Stztlon 59 (a) and (b), vhlch beoams etfeotlveOatober 2, 1917, reads as follovst

‘Sec. 59s. The cons8rvatIonand developmmt of all of the natural resouroe8 af thI8 State, lneluding the oontrol,storing, preservation and dlrrtributionOS Its 8torm and flood vatw8, the vater8 of Its rivers and streams,for Irrlgatlon,pwcr and all other useful purpo8e8, the reohnmtlon asd irrigationOS Its arid, semi-aridad other landa needing Irrlgatloe,and reOlaI8atIOn and dralmge Of Its orerfloved lands, and other landr needing drain-

### 63

Honorable Robert 0. **Pam, Page**  **3**

age, th8 oanrervatloa8ad denlopmat or its forests, vater and Wo-eleotrio pwor, the navigatlon of its inlandand oo88tal vatera, aad the pr88orv8tIon and oOMOm8tlOn of all rwh natural POSOUZ'O~S

Of th@ stat. U'. eaoh **end** 811 **&rob7** de&and publlo rights and dutlor: and the Loglrlaiao8hall pus all ruoh lava a8 nuy k appropriate



### ‘(i) There MT Ee oruted 

### vU&ia the State of Texas, or the State PIJ bo divided Into, rwh number 0r ooxu4matloa and reolamtloa di8trlot8 80 maybe determIn8d to b8 l rrmtial to the 

### l

ooorpliahm8ntof the pU?pOSeS Of this -&ttt t0 th. OOMtitUtiOa, vhioh diStPiOt8 S-11 be governmentalrgeaolea and bodies polltlo and OOrPOr8tevlth SUOh povera of governmnt and vlth the authorit? to rrenlre 8uOh rights, prIvIlego8and ?uaotloru coaaerning the Subjeot matter **of** this **ammdt8@nt u**  **ialq be**  oonfernd br **l&T. ”**  The

k@SbttU'O, ?Ozltit. PPrpOSeS Of ,@ViXl g l ffeot to Artiolo **16,** Sootion 59 (a) and (b) o? the Con8tItutlon, rupra, rnaoted Chapter 2, Title **128,** Vernont8 ClvIl Statutes,and partlaular attention is dinoted to Artloler 7271 and 76528 of Title 128.

Artlole 7471 NdS, la part, a8 ?011ow8,

"In the 

### oonaervcrtlon **aad** utlllratloaof vater deolared the property of the State, the pub118 velfan requin8 not only the reUOgaltIoaof we8 beaefioial to the pub110 veil boIag, **but** requires as a oonatrwtlre publlo pollor, b deolantloa of priOl$tieS in the allotmoatand 

### l pproprtitloathorooil and It la h8r8by doolared to be the pub110 polloy of th8 State aad l aa8ntI81 to the pub110 vel?ar8 and for tb, benefit of the people that in the allotmnt and 

### l pproprlatloaof tha waters defined la Artlole **7467,** of the Rovlr8dCivil St&tutor of Texas of 1925, 

### pnfenwr and priority **be** given to the ?ollwlng u8ea la the order ammd, to-witt

I

. . . .-. 

### 64

Honorable 

### Robert0. **Penn,** ?age 4



### “7. Reonation and ploaruro.'
Arm10 76528 mad8, ln put, as ?O~tWSt

**’ ub-reo.**  **1. Th@**  **Board** Of DiPeOtor8**of** S&h Dlatri iI t8 Sh811 bm. and a?8 hereby olot&d with the 

### powerand authority to adopt aad promulgateall 8UOh PUaoMbl@ ti.8 Utd PO~tlOM U UO doemd wOtJ888PJ ?OP pPe8OrVbg th0 SUdt~7 OOXtditiOn Of all 

### ntora ooatrolladby the Dirtriot, to prwoat vanto of vater, or the tmauthorlredtue thoreo?.to

“Sub-800. 0. ASJ rlolatloa 0s tha 

### proYl8Ion8 of this Act, 

### or such ruler and regulatlona, Uter dw promulgationtheroof as herolna?terprovided for, Sb11 be

ttitwrti., l

d Sh411 be pWi8h.d by a ia0 not to l

xaoed thcava **0s** one madnd

(#l o o.o o) bolhrr, 

### or ImpHronm8nt la the oount7 ail 0s tha county 

### vhere such offense taker plaoe, 4**or8tIm** not to oxcord thirtJ (#O) days, 

### or by both Such flno and Imprl8oamnt

. . .
IIt VX’itiDgth18 OpiXtiWt, Ye UO 888tdDg t&t tb Board 0s DInotor8 **0s** th8 Dlrtrlot duly 8dopt.d 8nd PUbliShOd the rules and regulatloru,as **required** 

### by Article 76528.

BJ Artlolo 16, goation 59 of the Constltutlon, SUPN, the sagirlatureIs empwend to authorlse the 0rganIsatloa0s pub110 

### or qu&l-publio 

### corporationa ohargedvlth the dut? of SOcurIng to all the poop10 a11 0s th8 ben.?ltS o? ooxmervation, protecting

### rlpulaa **PigbtS, if**  all7l **XiSt,** Vhil. SWiIQ the Y&trPS ttdt vould OthOXWiSeb lOSt, ud at the SapU tJu l eowing to all 0s the poop10 0s the State the rights 0s flirhvhenln rwh dIrtrI& is ioa4ted. Chapter 2, Title 

### 128, ibraon's Civil Ststutea,md mm~lwntr theP8t.o.

zh8 right 0s propartj, and the u8e th8r8or, is subject to the pollee ponr. of the State. Lombard0T. CItT of^,



### 7 Ronorablo Robert D. Penn, Page 5

Dallas, 73 SW(2d) 575~ 30 **Tex.** Jr. 120, Sea. 58. As to the povor 0s th8 taglrlatureto authorice the DIreotor8 0s the Red Blair Water 

### Pwor Control DIrtPlot to adopt and promlgata **ruaomblr** rub8 and PegIalbtiOaa, Cool8y, on Conrtitutional LImItatIon8,8th Rdltloa,Vol. I, page 231, ha8 th& follovlng to uyt "8osrdS amlcOmml881On8nwplaymltuportant part In the admlniatratlonof ou? law. The great SOOiai and IndubtrIal8volutloa0s the pa8t century, and the many d8mandS mado upon OUT Iuglrlatureby the increa8Ingcociplexlty 0s humn MtiVitiSS, have made essential the creation of these administrative bodioa and the delegationto then o? 08Ptalnpoverr. Though lOgl8latIV8

### pwer CwOt be delegated to board8 and 00~80ioIu~ the Leqlalaturearay delegate to them aarainistratlre rittiotio- in 

### carrying out the purposes 0s a statute and various gov8rnmental poverr 

### for the more efiicientadaIniLtratIoaOf the lav.' Undoubtedlythe tegiSb&tW 18 VithoUt pOVer to dolegate to a board or to an executive officer the paver to deolare vhat shall actually aoastltutoa criainal 0rm80. This has been pointed out by numerous 8UthOrItIe8,many Of vhIoh are cited In Ruling Case Lsv. Boo 6 R.C.L. 182. Such a delegation or paver IS held to be prohibitedbecause of the dlvlslon or poverr provided for ln the conatItutIonaof the statesand the Federal constitution.

**Hwever,** a8 i8 tither Stated **by** this text, it s8 competsnt for the bgirlatun to authorire a OOEE!dSSiOII to pPe8oribe certain dutler on vhlch the l&v may operateIn imposlng a penalty and in effeotuatfagthe broad generalpurposedesigned In enacting the law. by the authoritiescited. Thlr observationIL vsll-Supported In other vords, the lagIrlatur8 amy set out the gener81 purpose of the lav and leavelt to Some adeIn&tratlve body to fill In the dstallr by ml08 and rag&b

. An ind.i8pOn8ible requlreinemt

IL that the EtatUt itSOl? provide the penalty fOP tho VIOlatIOn Of the rules and regulations prescribed by the adminlatratlvebody. There mrut in a11 case8 be statutory6uthorIty for deolarlng that an act amounts to a **orlmo.**

Thur vhere **the** statute itSOl? preacribaa the punishmeat for vlolatlon8of the regulation8of the admInIatratIve body, It oaanotb8 said that It i8 uncoa8tItutIor.ml on the

.,. - 

### 66

. . Bortonble Robart D. Pam, Page 

### 6

theory that 1bgiS~tiTe pave8 

### to Croat0 a trims la delegated to such 8 body.

A SpeOifiC illwtratlon 0s the application

### 0s tbi8 prlnolple i8 presentedIn the 0888 of Unlted States v. 

### OrImmt$, 220 U.S. 

### 506, 31 S. Ct. 480, 55 U.S. (L&d.) 

### 563,who- It i8 held that legislative**paver** delegated to the Sooretaryof AgrlcultuP8 by th8 Forest **Rerorw** Act, m8kIng CrIBI~l the vlolatlon 0s the ruler aad ngulationa covering fOrSEt reasrvstion8 made and promulgatedby him under authority of ruoh statutes is constItutIoaal. A detallsddiSOu88ionof this ~a88 at this point nuypraveblpfbl.

~hap.'56),

By the rot of #arch 

### 3, 1891 

### (26 Stat.at L. 1103, U.S. Camp. 

### Stat, 1901,page 

### 1537),the President of the United States vaa authorlmd, from tImo to tlae, to set apart and **rosame,** in anj state or territory,public lands, vholly or b part oovered vith timber 

### or undergrowth, vhether 0s commercialvalue or not, as public forest reserortioru.

By subsequentleglslatloathe Secretary o? Agrlculture, 

### underthe pwor given him **by** various statutes,vaa authorized, to "makeprovisions fop the prOtectIonagdnat destrwtion by fire and depredationsupon the publio forests and forest reservations....~ and ha may make such rules and regulation8 and establishsuch SePvlce a8 vi11 1nsuzV the objeota 

### 0s such resorvatlonsj namely, to regulate their oooupanoy and ULO, and to preserve the **foreatn** thereon from destruotloa; and any violationof the provlafonrof thI8 act or suoh rules and regulatlona shall be puniahod,* as presoribed In Revised gtatUte8, Sec. 

### 5388,U.S. Coup. Stat. 1901, p. 3649, - vhloh, 88 amended, providedfor a 

### rm 0s 

### not IEore than $500.00and Imprlsonwat for not r&ore than tvelvemontha, or both, at the discretion o? the oourt.

**Under** the author$tr of theme statutes,the **Zewetary** of Agrloulturopromulgatedand establIshedcertain rules **for** 

### the purpose 

### or regulatingthe use and oacupenoy of the publo forest reservations,and among those so promulgatedMI tho SOllovIngt

"Regulation45. All 

### pbraonr must sccuro permltr before grulng My StOOk In 8 forest ~eservo (with certeinexceptions)."

### . . .-- 67

Bonorrble Robert D. Penn, P8ge 7

The defendantr, Orlmaud and Carajow vece charged vlth violating thl8 rule, arrd on tri81 contendedthat the Rorert Rererve Aat vu unooA8titutioAal in8ofm 88 lt delegated to the Secretary of Agrloulture the paver to tie ruler md regulation8and make violationthereo? 8 9e~al offense. Thlr contentionva8 8U8taiilOd by tha trial court and the c88e var sp9ealed to the United State8 Suprem Court,vhere the trial court va8 z'eVOr8ed.

In a rather exhawtive opinionby Mr. JuatlaeLemsr, the COUH madO 8Om VOrJ ilbX8tAdiAg 8tatW%i+At8 vhloh ve quote a8 iOiiOV81

"That fCongm88 cannot delegate legialatlve power is a prlnolpleuniversallyracognizedas vital to the integritytbnd nniatensnce0r the systemof govemntentordainedby the CoA8tltution,t Wmhall Field Ir

Go. vs. Xurk, 143 U.S. 692, 35 L. ad. 309, I2 Sup. Ct. Rap, 495. But the authority to m&e adminlstratlva rule8 18 not a delegationof legi8l8tive pwex-,
nor are such rule8 raised from an administntlve to a legislatlvacharacter because the vlolatloAthereof 18 punished 88 a public OffeASe.
*xt 18 true that there la no act OS CoAgresr vhloh, in exprees terns,declare8 that It shsllbe unlawful to grime sheep 0~ 8 forest reserve. But the statutes from vhloh ve h8ve quoted declare that the privilege of using re8ervi38 for ' all proper and lawful purpo8e8* ia subject to the proviro that the person 80 u8Ug them 8h811 conply 'vlth the rule snd regulationsooverlng stid forest reservation.~ The sama act makes it 821ottewe to violate those regulstloAaj t&t i8, to u8e them othervlrethan in ~00ord8Ace vlth the rule8 establl8hedby the Secretary. Thus the lmplaad llceA8e under vhloh the United State8 had suffered Its public domain to be used a8 a pasture for sheep and cattle,mentionedin Buf'ord v. Routs, 133 U.S. 326, 33 L. ed. 620, 10 sup. ct. Rep. 305, +a8 curtailedand qualifiedby 

### Congress, to the extent that ruch privilege should not be exerolsedl.n oontraventionof the rule8 and regulations. Wllaox
v. Jack8on, 13 Pet. 513, 10 L. ed. 271,Honorable Robert D. **Penn, Page**  

### 8

"If, 8ft.W the plL888gO Of the 8Ot &rid

the promulgation of the rule, the defendant8 drove and grued thea 8hWp upon the rer)erve, la vlolrtloa of the regulatlo~, the7 

### werePeking an ualavhl we Of the gOVOl'nmlIt'8 DrOQOPty. In do- 80 they tho?ebPmulo thu8elves liable to the pus1t.P iEpO8Odw COII@'@88."

Ia a 8Ub8ecpiOat case ari8ing in TOXU, our Court of OrLm5nalAppealr enu?iolated smoh the 8ame rule la oonaeotloa vlth the Tlok Eradloatlon Lav,, xhioh at th8 time 

### l ppoarod in Ax-tide

7312 **et** 8Oq. (II.0.S. x911), but vhloh 18 aov oodlfled **a8** Artiole 15250 of the Penal Code. Mul.ke~ v. Stat@, 

### 83 Tex. Cr. 1, 201 S.W. 991.

Thi8 l8V areated the EiVO Stook SUtit8rJQd88iOn and pre8orlbed it8 dUtie8 aad pwerr. Under that lav the COW miorionvas "authorizedand empwered to ertabll.rh, maintain ~andenforoe suoh quamatinellnes and sanltaI7awle8 a8 It may deem neoesrar~,.... Ql8WAdiM mf dilt?fiOt, COW&y OF &UU’t

Of OOuntf, within thlr rtato vhen It &all detemalnethe faot that oattle 

### or other live 8took in ruoh di8triot,oounty 

### or part of oounty, am affeotrd.... to 

### dco and promulgaterule8 

### anb rogulatlona, whloh 8hall 

### permitaad govera the inrpeation,.... treatment, handling and nmthod and -P of dellverPand ohlpnmat of cattle and Other llV0 8tOOk frOm a qUaraI&lN d<FlOt, OOtWP OC p8l't

Of OOIUltJ

intO Other bi8triOt8....8ha11 g&V0nOti of such rule8 8~13

~egta&btloa

by proolanst'lon



### irrued by the governor.

" 

### Vernon’8Sayler'Ann. Clv. St. 1914, tit. 

### 731.5.
**OthOP** provl810~ **la** the **hr protided**  that no oattlr or other livertook oould b8 moved Tom one quamntlnod dilrtrlet to another 

### l

xoept In the 

### zmnaerprovidedby tha oomml88ion.
Under the authority ot therre statrL8, the Live Steak Sanitary Commi88iea promulgatedd, la the mmner 

### pro8orlbed, order III, vhloh provided:

'It 8ha11 be unlrrwul **for** any cattle to bo ID*- ed Into, Vlthln, **or** fmm 88ld area Until thoP have been lnrpeotedand oartii'led to by an inrpeotor o? the Live Stook Saulty CoaPi88ionor the Vnlted btate8 Bureau of Animal lDdu8try,eta.”Honorable Robert D. **Peaa, Page**  9

D8fadaat Hulkof var charged vlth Ylolatioaof order III, and, oa trIa1, vu ooavloted In the lover oourt, from vhioh he appealed to the oourt of orlmlnal appealr. He contendedthat the lnformtloa oa vhAoh he va8 oonvioted charged np oifenee **beoawe** It ohaqed the rlolatlon o? aa order premorlbed br the LIwo Stook Seal- C~88lon, vhioh we8 AOt aa 8Ot Of th8 bgi8htUl'O, aad th8t the h&8- lature oould not delemte the lav-mskingpaver to raid oommi8810~ In vlolatIonof Seotlon 1, Art. 3 of the Coa8titutioa.

The Court oi CrImInalAppea& afilra8d the trial oourt, oItIngAUl8O~OU8 authorltiersu8talnIngit8 holding. The oourt 8tateds

“Under the80 authorltle8 ve thiak the authority giVeA t0 Our liV0 8toOk wtarr Wlm4I88IOnt0 quarantinelive 8twk and to adopt ruler ~4 regU.latlan8 to enforoe the 8ame4, rhen prqperl7promulgated by thr 

### Oovernor, 18 not the exeroise of Legielative funotlon8by the 00~m~I88lon, and that ruoh rule8 

### and rogdationr 80 properly promulgated 

### are valld, and the violation thereofmay bo nrdr an offense. Thi8 rerultr In holding that th8 indiotment herein ua8 valid In 

### ohrglng an Offen8e." lie do not con8ldm the 0880 of Dockery v. State, 93 Rex. Cr. R. 220, 247 S.Y. 508, vhich WM oitedby you in your brlet a8 oontrolllng. Although the Bklke~ cane walldeolded lrsr than flvr year8 beion the Doolcery ca8e by the 8ame oourt, the 00upf doe8 aOt oonslder 

### or alto the blulkey cue as being IA aoafliot.

In the rtatute oo~ldered la the 

### Doukery aa80, AO pr0Vi8iOava8 made for promulgat%ag t&e rule8 andregulatIoa8 of the Stat0 

### Fire Harshal. The ~gi8l&U'O attempted to dole

### gate to the raar8ha1, the 

### paverand 

### l

utharlty to prrroribe rule8 applicable throughoutthe Stat.,vlthout 8pPUent rea8on 

### ior not pre8orlblng8uah rule8 itreli. Ill th0 NulkrJCare 8lld 

### under the 8tatuterbeing aamldered in fhi8 OpipLon, deflalte method8 of promulgation are provided,and the rril.8promulgated we to be applloableonly to lImIted pOrtIOn8 o? the State. The fire marshal In the Dookery situationMI givenunlimited discretion In formulatingrule8 and regulation8In regard to fir8 ewape8, vlthaut any lndlaationof the PurPoreto bei 1

.”

Honorable Robert D. PeAA, Page 10

i

: aooomplirhedby suoh regulation8and rules. Ye believe that

If there had been any real nrroe88ltp 

### for giving the fire mr8hal 8uah a vlde diroretlon,the rtatuteafght have bean upheld.

At any rate, ve 8ee **by** the Mulkey aa8e, that the empwering of a board or corml88loato prerorlbe oertrln rule8 and regulatIoA8aAd maklng the vlolatlon of 8uOh rule8 and regulatlonra peaal offensevlth prerorlbedpeMltle8 18 not, 

### par 80, uncon8tItutIa~l.

The ~gi8btU.N it8elf ha8 pa88ed laV8 l%gUkSting the right8 of the pub110 to the vater8 

### of the 

### riverad the lake, and bar provided **for** the proteotlon of these rights **by** authorlrlng the Board of ltlreotora to promulgaterea8onable poliae and 8anltary regulations.

Ped Rl~~~~~~"P~~e",'~~~t~~~~r~~tth~3~~ ~~6~~~ ~~~IfIoall~ held that the rule8 and reguiationsa8 pros&ated by the Board of Mreotors of the DI8trlotvere rearoaable. The rulas aad regulationa of the Red Bluff Water Parer Control District vem again upheld by the Court of Civil Appeal8 at xl Pa80 IA an opinion ded
v dowA in the case 31 Roluld XI Roberson, et al v. Red luff Water Pover Control DirtriotOA June 6, 1940, (not Pet beported).

The facts in the Dlverslon Lake Club V. Beatb tale, 86 SU (26) 441, cited **by** you, 18 &early di8tinguisbablO fX'on the f8Ot8 1nVOlVed IA the iA8t8llt CMe. IA the biVer8iOn I&k0 Club case a private corporation, vhIoh ha8 M authorIt?In lay to appropiate the vater of a navigable 8trean, va8 lnv$lved. In thfs Oase the Club attempted to appropriatethe vatere of a navigable strem to the excluslo~of the publio, and **for** the pIAL- of 

### OreatiAg a privatehunting and fishingpre8arve.

In the lnntant.

came, the rule8 and regulation8promulgated by the Red Bluff Water Pover Control Mstrict are applicable to all perrow alike. 190 attempt 18 made to exclude-. 

### ';)'I '.

.

Bonorablo Robert D. Pm, ?ago 11

the publio rron tlrhing, 

### or other*lre 

### l

a~oylng 

### the

vater8 

### of the Dlrtrlot. RaorwtIoaal prlvllegerand ?aollltlerof the Mrtrlot are offered to the g8n8Fal pub110 on term8 that are equal to all, aad under rule8 and regulation8vhioh have been jud$olallyd8tormlnodto k rea8onablo 

### aad propor.

&8 t0 JOUl'8Ug@8tiOa tht 8 OPilSiMl pFO8OOUtiOa would not 118 la thir lnrtmo~, booau8e of the hot that the penalty provided In ~tlole ‘f652a 18 not oarrled over into the Penal &de, your 8tt8nMOn 28 oalled to the feat that Artlolo 7698 vu not elvoted until the yw 1935, tea year8 after the la8t oodifluatloa of the pwial Wd8.

Th8refor8, In vl8v of tho foregoing authoritie8you are r.a8prot~1y advlwd that it 18 the opiplon o? thI8 department that the Board o? Mreatorr of th8 Red Blu?? 

### Uater Paver Oontrol Dl8trlotIry promulgate reasonable ruh8 and regulatlon8 vhioh may ?orm the ba8ir o? a orlalirul proseoutlan; hovever, ve are not undortaklngto pa88 upon the validity of any rule or regulation thw promulgatedor vh8ther i&&e ha8 been **a** vlolatlon o? any **rub** 

### or regulation

### under the partloular fact8 pFO8OAtOd br YOU.

Trulting that this 8ati8?aatari~y di8pO808 o? your Inquiry, ve remain
YOU?8 very truly

D. Burl0 ad88

h8818t8nt

DBDrAli