alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00398-CV

In the Matter of the Marriage of Raymond Blinn Barron III and Crystal Dawn Barron 

and in the Interest of C.L.B and S.G.B.

On Appeal from the

135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-06-85886-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 5, 2022
EXHIBIT 23.01
                                                                   -------------






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-88513, No. 333-39016, No. 333-75230 and No.
333-89886) of DSL.net, Inc. of our reports dated February 14, 2003, except for
Note 16 as to which the date is March 26, 2003, relating to the financial
statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Stamford, CT
March 28, 2003
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip Luizzo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Accufacts Pre-Employment
Screening, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):


         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.


Date:   March 30, 2004

/S/ PHILIP LUIZZO.
-----------------------------------------------
Philip Luizzo.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer





                                     PAGE 23

<PAGE>
IB 

Union Calendar No. 583 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6474 

[Report No. 118–689] 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal exploration 

and development in previously studied or developed areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2023 

Mrs. STEEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Additional sponsor: Ms. LEE of Nevada 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6474 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal exploration and development in previously studied or developed areas. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6474 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEPA REVIEW. 

4 Section 390 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 15942) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, or the 

7 Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et 

8 seq.) for the purpose of exploration or development 

9 of geothermal resources’’ after ‘‘or gas’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (b)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or gas’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘, gas, or geothermal’’; and 

13 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘or gas’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘, gas, or geothermal’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 583 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6474 

[Report No. 118–689] 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expepreviously studied or developed areas. dite geothermal exploration and development in 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2014
(the Report), I, Joseph Fuda, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: February 27, 2015 | /s/ Joseph Fuda              
|----------------------- | -----------------------------
|                        | Joseph Fuda                  
|                        | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        | (Principal executive officer)

---
Exhibit 10.29
 EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT
Ronnie Robinson
      1. EMPLOYMENT
 AT WILL.
 POSITION.
 OBLIGATIONS.
 BASE SALARY.
 EQUITY COMPENSATION.
 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS.




---



##### 



BONUS AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVES.
 OFFICE AND FACILITIES.
 EXPENSES.
 VACATION.
 2. DEFINITIONS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
 CAUSE.
     CHANGE IN CONTROL.
   2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



NOTICE OF TERMINATION.
 PRO-RATED BONUS AMOUNT.
 TERMINATION DATE.
 3. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT; COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION
 TERMINATION BY COMPANY WITH CAUSE, OR VOLUNTARY TERMINATION BY EXECUTIVE.
    TERMINATION BY COMPANY WITHOUT CAUSE OR UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL.
     4




---



##### 



SECTION 409A COMPLIANCE
  5




---



##### 



4. EXECUTIVE COVENANTS.
 UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE, NONDISPARAGEMENT.
 NON-COMPETITION.
  NON-SOLICITATION.
  DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS UPON TERMINATION.
  6




---



##### 



INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
 REMEDIES.
  5. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS.
   7




---



##### 



6. ARBITRATION.
 7. NOTICE
   
 
  
 8. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS
 9. MISCELLANEOUS
  8




---



##### 



10. GOVERNING LAW
 11. SEVERABILITY
 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 TWEEN BRANDS, INC.By:
    /s/ Michael RaydenName:
    Michael RaydenTitle:
    Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerEXECUTIVE/s/ Ronnie RobinsonRonnie Robinson  9
<TABLE> <S> <C>




                    



<ARTICLE> 5





<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE RERERENCED TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         287,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,152,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,802,000
<INVENTORY>                                    560,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,889,000
<PP&E>                                       1,836,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 410,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,487,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,109,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,951,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,487,000
<SALES>                                     13,263,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,263,000
<CGS>                                        5,315,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,787,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             307,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                169,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    74,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $ 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $ 0.01
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the              Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Mark R. Newburg                                                                                          | Dated: |                  August 14, 2006 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Mark                R. Newburg                                                                                              |   |                                  |
| Title: | President,                Chief Executive Officer                and Treasurer (Principal                Executive Officer) |   |                                  |
|   |                                                                                                                        |   |                                  |
| By:    | /s/                Arnaldo F. Galassi                                                                                       | Dated: |                  August 14, 2006 |
|   | Arnaldo                F. Galassi                                                                                           |   |                                  |
| Title: | Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial                Officer)                           |   |                                  |

----
#### In the Matter of Dennie Chan, Respondent-Appellant, v Brion Travis, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole, Appellant-Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 896]

Kane, J.

Cross appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sheridan, J.), entered March 10, 2003 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner, who was serving a prison sentence, had his first appearance before the Board of Parole in 2001. After the Board denied parole and his administrative appeal went unanswered, petitioner commenced this proceeding to annul the Board’s determination. In 2003, Supreme Court granted the petition, annulled the determination and remanded the matter to the Board for rehearing. Respondent appealed, and petitioner cross-appealed the court’s dismissal of one of his claims. Shortly thereafter, petitioner appeared before the Board at his regularly scheduled review, not a rehearing of the first review. At that time, the Board granted petitioner parole.

Initially, since petitioner did not appear in this appeal, his cross appeal is deemed abandoned. As to respondent’s appeal, it *821is moot based on the Board’s grant of parole to petitioner, and we find no exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Lichtel v Travis,*287 AD2d 837, 838 [2001]). We further decline to exercise our discretion, as urged by respondent, to vacate Supreme Court’s judgment but instead simply dismiss the appeal as moot *(see Matter of Sarbro IX v McGowan,*271 AD2d 829, 830 [2000]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Exhibit 10.1


 






THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS







OF







SEEDO CORP.







The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held on this 28th day of February, 2019;







The Board of Directors which was present for this meeting & took active part therein was:







Zohar Levy







WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to appoint new Directors and Board Members of the Company;







NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of Board having considered this matter, has decided and RESOLVED that it has appointed:







PNINAT YANAY as Director, and Board Member;







The Above qualified person, having been nominated, has Accepted her position and shall join Zohar Levy, Jendayi Frazer and Micha Maman as Director and Board Member, said appointment and officer status shall begin immediately, to be ratified by the next Shareholder’s meeting to be held on or before March 30th, 2019.







Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records




 






DATED: 28th February, 2019


 













Zohar Levy, Director, CEO
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Vitalstate, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa Dalberth,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Lisa Dalberth
-------------------------------
Name:   Lisa Dalberth
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   April 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6374 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6374

      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2023

  Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. Allred, Mr. Dunn of Florida, and Mr. 
    Crow) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the 
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS HEALTH CARE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for the medical care and treatment 
of veterans, the United States Postal Service shall provide for the 
issuance and sale of a special postage stamp which shall be known as 
the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp''.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the Veterans 
Health Care Stamp shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code (as last in effect, if expired), except that--
            (1) all amounts becoming available from the sale of the 
        stamp shall be transferred to the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs in accordance with section 416(d) of such title; and
            (2) the stamp--
                    (A) shall be issued in time for Veterans Day of 
                each year;
                    (B) shall bear such illustration, depiction, 
                design, or other image as the United States Postal 
                Service shall determine; and
                    (C) shall not be subject to any numerical 
                limitation under section 416(e)(1)(C) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
2015 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

8-4-2015 

# U S A v . Dun g B ui

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2015

Thi s Au g us t i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of A

ppe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2015 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . Dun g B ui " (2015). 2015 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 823. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2015/823

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________
No. 11

- 3795

_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DUNG BUI a/k/a DANNY BUI

Dung Bui, Appellant

______________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES D ISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. C rim . Action No. 5

- 08

- cr

- 00427

- 002 ) District Judge: Honorable Legrome D. Davis

______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

June 26, 2014

______________
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge

, and FUENTES, and GREENAWAY, JR.

, Circuit Judges

.

______________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION

______________

A lthough the panel denied rehearing in this matter, it agrees that two changes to the opinion should be made as suggested by the government. Accord ingly, an amended opinion shall be issued. The judgment of this Court shall not be altered.

### By the Court,

s/Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge

Dated: August 4, 2015
#### Dellie Britt et al., Appellants, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[770 NYS2d 744]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated November 22, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant New York City Housing Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A landlord has no duty to prevent one tenant from attacking another tenant unless it has the authority, ability, and opportunity to control the actions of the assailant *(see Adelstein v Waterview Towers,*250 AD2d 790, 791 [1998]; *Siino v Reices,*216 AD2d 552, 553 [1995]; *Johnson v Slocum Realty Corp.,*191 AD2d 613, 614-615 [1993]; *Blatt v New York City Hous. Auth.,*123 AD2d 591, 592 [1986]). Here, the landlord’s power to evict the assailant did not furnish it “with a reasonable opportunity or effective means to prevent or remedy [the assailant’s] unacceptable conduct, since the incident giving rise to the injuries sustained, and indeed, the pattern of harassment alleged by the plaintiff, arose from a purely personal dispute between the two individuals” *(Blatt v New York City Hous. Auth., supra*at 593 [citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]; *see also*
      *515
      *Firpi v New York City Hous. Auth.,*175 AD2d 858, 859 [1991]). Moreover, under the circumstances presented, the assault upon the injured plaintiff was not foreseeable *(see Firpi v New York City Hous. Auth., supra*at 859; *see also Adelstein v Waterview Towers, supra*at 791; *Hughes v City of New York,*238 AD2d 477 [1997]; *Perry v Northwestern Realty Co.,*236 AD2d 378 [1997]). Accordingly, the landlord’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it was properly granted.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.