alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Kent A. Steinwert, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen W.
Haley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities
Exchange act of 1934 and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. $ 1350), that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. $ 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


March 10, 2006


/s/ Kent A. Steinwert
------------------------
Kent A. Steinwert
President & Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Stephen W. Haley
------------------------
Stephen W. Haley
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 11



                       OPTION CARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                       (In thousands, except share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                          March 31
                                        1997     1996
                                       -------  -------


<S>                                    <C>      <C>
Net income...........................  $   922  $   850
                                       =======  =======

Weighted average shares issued.......   10,564   10,481
Additional shares included assuming
  exercise of stock options using
  treasury stock method..............      234       37
                                       -------  -------
Weighted average common shares and
  common share equivalents...........   10,798   10,518
                                       =======  =======

Net income per common and common
  equivalent share...................  $  0.09  $  0.08
                                       =======  =======

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6514 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6514

  To require agencies to notify the Archivist of the date on which a 
 final rule is submitted to Congress and the Government Accountability 
                                Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2023

 Mr. Alford (for himself, Mr. Meuser, and Mr. Finstad) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require agencies to notify the Archivist of the date on which a 
 final rule is submitted to Congress and the Government Accountability 
                                Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Holding Agencies Accountable Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE DATE RULE IS SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS AND 
              GAO.

    (a) In General.--Upon submission of a final rule to Congress and 
the Government Accountability Office, the head of the agency shall 
notify the Archivist of the date of such submission. The Archivist 
shall include such date in the Document Details of the rule published 
in the Federal Register.
    (b) Agency and Rule Defined.--In this section, the terms ``agency'' 
and ``rule'' have the meaning given those terms in section 551 of title 
5, United States Code.

SEC. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH CUTGO.

    No additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act. Such Act shall be carried out using amounts otherwise 
appropriated to the head of the agency.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          130,189
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    75,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                290,376
<PP&E>                                          183,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                   54,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  585,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           464,552
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           1
<COMMON>                                          1,900
<OTHER-SE>                                       62,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    585,740
<SALES>                                         759,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                759,394
<CGS>                                           447,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,243,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (482,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (482,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (482,794)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.58)
        


</TABLE>
#### IN RE: Jokwan Lamar HARVEY, Petitioner.

No. 17-1040

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 3, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

Jokwan Lamar Harvey, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jokwan Lamar Harvey has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus. In his petition, Harvey asks this court to order the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently disposed of Harvey’s habeas motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Harvey’s § 2255 motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and iegal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and, argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1999 FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      46,307,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,680,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (44,800)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               639,360
<PP&E>                                       6,268,778
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,715,117)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,766,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,052,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    75,535,710
<OTHER-SE>                                (31,523,320)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,766,725
<SALES>                                      4,650,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,650,818
<CGS>                                     (10,381,390)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (10,381,390)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (15,428,311)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (35,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (23,110)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,807,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,807,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,807,427
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.12)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John Woods, Appellant.

Argued May 20, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*Alfred A. Duffy*and *Benjamin Schifter*for appellant.

*Thomas Cradock Hughes, Acting District Attorney (Henry J. Walsh*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgments reversed and indictment dismissed. There is in this record no proof of such conscious, exclusive and personal possession as would warrant the jury in convicting the defendant of larceny. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ*.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Charter for the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Committee (TAP), has been renewed for a two-year period beginning February 16, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Terrie English, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Director, at                         *TaxpayerAdvocacyPanel@irs.gov.*                         For questions about TAP, call the TAP toll-free number, 1-888-912-1227.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), and with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury to announce the charter renewal for the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Committee (TAP). The TAP purpose is to provide a taxpayer perspective to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on critical tax administrative programs. The TAP shall provide listening opportunities for taxpayers to independently identify suggestions or comments to improve IRS customer service through grass roots outreach efforts, and have direct access to elevate improvement recommendations to the appropriate operating divisions. The TAP shall also serve as a focus group to provide suggestions and/or recommendations directly to IRS management on IRS strategic initiatives.

      ( print page 10431)    
Dated: February 18, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-03928 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF ART TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF ORGANIZATION                                   JURISDICTION
--------------------                                   ------------
<S>                                                    <C>
ATG Securities Corporation                             Massachusetts
ATG Global, Inc.                                       Massachusetts
Art Technology Group B.V.                              Netherlands
Art Technology Group GmbH                              Germany
Art Technology Group (Europe) Limited                  United Kingdom
Art Technology Group Australia Pty Limited             Australia
Art Technology Group (Canada) Inc.                     Canada
Art Technology Group Canada ULC                        Canada
Art Technology Group, S.A.R.L.                         France
Art Technology Group HK Limited                        Hong Kong
Art Technology Group, KK                               Japan
ATG E-Business Solutions PTE LTD                       Singapore
Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc.                       Washington
Primus Knowledge Solutions (UK) Limited                United Kingdom
Primus Knowledge Solutions France                      France
Amacis Group, Limited                                  Northern Ireland
Amacis, Inc.                                           Massachusetts
Amacis Ltd.                                            Northern Ireland
Amacis Trustees Ltd.                                   Northern Ireland
AnswerLogic, Inc.                                      Delaware
Broad Daylight, Inc.                                   Delaware
Imparto, Inc.                                          Delaware
2order.com, Inc.                                       Delaware
</TABLE>
#### Marion L. Kirby, Respondent, *v.*Fred J. Tricker et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 8, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*Rudolph Dugan*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, unless appellant serves and files undertaking on appeal within ten days, in which event the motion is denied.
### (^/,'frSD^z April 3rd, aois ^oo fm l£5 

### KosWr^V^W^O RECEIVED IM COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS flU W», C-W APR 082015 5upatvM. CouA Mi'ivxji AbelAcosta, Clerk



### cW fA^A iU 05 XA* ^ kn^o if ^ *W
ju\c£f«-»iy 

## Mi Cc: Wil
CERTIFICATE  PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C.  SUBSECTION  1350

                              EXHIBIT  32.2

                        CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                         18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                         AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
              SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Prime  Air,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  and 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 1 for the quarter ended
September  30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  section 13(a)
     or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
     material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
     operations  of  the  Company.


Dated  December  5,  2003            /s/  Wayne  Koch
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Wayne  Koch
                                   Director  and
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
                                   (Principal  Financial  Officer)



<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**JOSE MIGUAL PEREZ,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 104 MM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or**

**Extraordinary Relief is** DENIED

**.**
#### William PARKER, Appellant v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK, Appellee

No. 16-7136

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: August 15, 2017

William Parker, Woodbridge, VA, pro se.

Matthew James Sharbaugh, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed September 28, 2016, be affirmed. Appellee has provided a “legitimate, non-discriminatory reason” for its employment decision, and appellant has not “produced sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that the employer’s asserted non-discriminatory reason was not the actual reason and that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee on the basis of’ a characteristic protected by law. Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 493-94 (D.C. Cir. 2008); see also Burley v. Nat’l Passenger Rail Corp., 801 F.3d 290, 296 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (applying McDonnell Douglas framework to Title VII and D.C. Human Rights Act claims); Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (applying McDonnell Douglas framework to claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981). He also failed to show that the final decision maker reached her determination without “conducting] an independent review of the evidence,” Hampton v. Vilsack, 685 F.3d 1096, 1101 (D.C. Cir. 2012), or that his termination was proximately caused by the discriminatory acts of others, see Hairston v. Vance-Cooks, 773 F.3d 266, 275 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Finally, appellant forfeited arguments mentioned for the first time on appeal. See Salazar ex rel. Salazar v. District of Columbia, 602 F.3d 431, 437 (D.C. Cir. 2010).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6538 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a definition of ‘‘establishment, determination, or adjustment of employee compensation’’ for 

purposes of the collective bargaining of certain Department of Veterans 

Affairs employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2023 

Mr. TAKANO (for himself and Mr. BOST) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

definition of ‘‘establishment, determination, or adjustment of employee compensation’’ for purposes of the 

collective bargaining of certain Department of Veterans 

Affairs employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Correct Compensa5 tion Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6538 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF ‘‘ESTABLISHMENT, DETERMINA2 TION, OR ADJUSTMENT OF EMPLOYEE COM3 PENSATION’’ FOR PURPOSES OF THE COL4 LECTIVE BARGAINING OF CERTAIN DEPART5 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS EMPLOYEES. 

6 Subsection (c) of section 7422 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c) In this section: 

9 ‘‘(1) The term ‘professional conduct or com10 petence’ means any of the following: 

11 ‘‘(A) Direct patient care. 

12 ‘‘(B) Clinical competence. 

13 ‘‘(2) The term ‘establishment, determination, or 

14 adjustment of employee compensation’— 

15 ‘‘(A) means setting a rate of pay as re16 quired by applicable law, rule, or regulation; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(B) does not include a grievance chal19 lenging whether an employee described in sec20 tion 7421(b) of this title has received the cor21 rect compensation as required by law, rule, reg22 ulation, or binding agreement.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB