alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FLK 8K


Exhibit 10.5




Sale of Goods Agreement

Agreement made on May 1, 2017, between Folkup Development Inc., of Mileve Maric Ajnstajn 72, Novi Beograd, Republic of Serbia 11070, in this agreement referred to as Seller, and Kopetr LLC of 17 Karadjordjeva st., Beograd, Republic of Serbia 11070, in this agreement referred to as Buyer.

1. SALE OF GOODS 



Seller shall sell to Buyer on or before May 1, 2017, the following goods:




					
	No.

	DESCRIPTION

	QUANTITY 

	UNIT PRICE (USD)

	TOTAL PRICE (USD)


	1

	IconBIT Smart Scooter SD-0012K Kit Black

	23

	280

	6,440.00


	2

	Monowheel Airwheel X3 170 Wh

	2

	530

	1,060.00


	 
	TOTAL:

	25

	 

	7,500.00







The transportation cost shall be at the expense of Buyer.



2. CONSIDERATION 

The full price for the goods is $7,500 (Seven thousand and five hundred) US Dollars. Buyer shall accept the goods and pay $4,000 (Four thousand) US Dollars as prepayment. The remaining amount in consideration of $3,500 (Three thousand and five hundred) US Dollars shall be paid not later than May 20, 2017. 

3. IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS 

Identification of the goods to this agreement shall not be deemed to have been made until both buyer and seller have specified that the goods in question are to be appropriated to the performance of this agreement.  

4. PAYMENT ON RECEIPT

Buyer shall make payment for the goods at the time when, and at the place where, the goods are received by Buyer.

5. WARRANTY OF NO ENCUMBRANCES 

Seller warrants that the goods are now free, and that at the time of delivery shall be free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance.

6. WARRANTY OF TITLE 

Furthermore, seller warrants that at the time of signing this agreement, seller neither knows nor has reason to know of the existence of any outstanding title or claim of title hostile to the rights of seller in the goods.

7. RIGHT OF INSPECTION 

Buyer shall have the right to inspect the goods on arrival and, within 10 business days after delivery, buyer must give notice to seller of any claim for damages on account of condition, quality or grade of the goods, and buyer must specify the basis of the claim of buyer in detail. The failure of buyer to comply with these conditions shall constitute irrevocable acceptance of the goods by buyer.

In witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement at Belgrade, Republic of Serbia the day and year first above written.

		
	Seller




/s/ Milena Topolac Tomovic

Milena Topolac Tomovic, President

	Buyer




/s/ Fourat Sebti

Fourat Sebti, Director












1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Luis POSADA-GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41543 Consolidated with 16-41539 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 28, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jorge Luis Posada-Guevara, Pro Se

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis Posada-Guevara has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Posa-da-Guevara has filed a response.- We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Posada-Guevara’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Florence E. Riley, Appellant, *v.*Charlotte Carlton, Respondent.

Argued May 18, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*Esmond Murphy*for appellant.

*Frank Gibbons*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
Selvin E. SHAW, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D17-5174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

Selvin E. Shaw, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
#### John Harding, Plaintiff, *v.*F. H. LaGuardia, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Defendants.

Submitted February 23, 1943;

decided March 4, 1943.

*Charles P. Sullivan, District Attorney (James F. T. Delaney*of counsel), for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed.
#### Donna KLECKA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel COX, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-35261

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 17, 2017 * Anchorage, Alaska

Filed August 22, 2017

Danny W. Burton, Esquire, Attorney, Law Office of Danny W. Burton, Wasilla, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellant

*312Susan Mendenhall West, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, AGAK—Office of the Alaska Attorney General (Anchorage), Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Plaintiff Donna Klecka appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment, based on qualified immunity, to Defendant Daniel Cox. Like the district court, we conclude that Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, and therefore summary judgment was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm.

Plaintiff did not satisfy her burden of proving that Defendant’s conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right. *Pearson v. Callahan,*555 U.S. 223, 231, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009). First, Plaintiff failed to prove that Defendant acted in an objectively unreasonable manner given the circumstances. *Sandoval v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep’t,*756 F.3d 1154, 1166 (9th Cir. 2014). Plaintiff was actively resisting arrest, at one point evading another officer’s grip with a loose handcuff attached to her wrist. It was not unreasonable for Defendant to perceive this action as a potential threat and respond accordingly. Further, Defendant was not on notice that he was responding with an unreasonable amount of force. *Brooks v. Clark County,*828 F.3d 910, 920 (9th Cir. 2016). Not only have we found similar uses of force to be appropriate in comparable situations, *see Tatum v. City of San Francisco,*441 F.3d 1090, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006), but Plaintiff cites no case law to demonstrate that it was clearly established that such conduct violated her constitutional rights.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 16-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of VendingData Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Steven J. Blad,Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and John R. Spina, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  STEVEN J. BLAD                    |   | Dated: | August 18,  2003 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Steven  J. Blad                        |   |   |
| Title: | Chief  Executive Officer and President |   |   |

 

 
| By:    | /s/  JOHN R. SPINA                     |   | Dated: | August 18,  2003 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | John  R. Spina                         |   |   |
| Title: | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |   |

 

 

Thiscertification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any otherpurpose.

 

----
Name
    

Jurisdiction
of Incorporation/FormationInternet Capital Group Operations, Inc.
    
    DelawareICG Holdings, Inc.
    
    Delaware2008 Internet Capital LP
    
    Delaware2009 Internet Capital LP
    
    DelawareAcquirgy, Inc.
    
    DelawareAnthem Ventures Annex Fund, L.P.
    
    DelawareAnthem Ventures Fund, L.P.
    
    DelawareAnthem Venture Investors, LLC
    
    DelawareBlackboard, Inc.
    
    DelawareCaptive Capital Corporation
    
    DelawareChannel Intelligence, Inc.
    
    DelawareClickEquations, Inc. (f/k/a Commerce360, Inc.)
    
    DelawareFreeborders, Inc.
    
    DelawareGoIndustry DoveBid plc
    
    United KingdomGovDelivery Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareGovDelivery, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaGovDocs, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaGovLoop, Inc.
    
    MinnesotaICG Commerce Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareICG Commerce, Inc.
    
    PennsylvaniaICG Commerce Australia Pty Limited
    
    AustraliaICG Commerce Germany GmbH
    
    GermanyICG Commerce India Private Limited
    
    IndiaICG Commerce Investments, LLC
    
    DelawareICG Commerce International, LLC
    
    DelawareICG Commerce Latin America, S. de. R.L., de C.V.
    
    MexicoICG Commerce Mexico I, LLC
    
    DelawareICG Commerce Mexico II, LLC
    
    DelawareICG Commerce (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaICG Commerce Services, S. de. R.L. de C.V.
    
    MexicoICG Commerce UK Limited
    
    United KingdomICGC Singapore Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeICG Patent, Inc.
    
    DelawareInvestor Force Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareInvestor Force, Inc.
    
    DelawareInvestor Force Securities, Inc.
    
    DelawareJamcracker, Inc.
    
    DelawareLGO Corporation (f/k/a Logistics.com, Inc.)
    
    DelawareMetastorm Inc.
    
    MarylandOneCoast Network Holdings, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaRotider Holdings Corporation (f/k/a Vcommerce Corporation)
    
    DelawareSavana, Inc. (d/b/a Epitome Systems)
    
    DelawareSeaPass Solutions Inc.
    
    DelawareStage2 Capital Ventures Associates, L.P.
    
    DelawareStarCite, Inc.
    
    DelawareStarCite LLC
    
    DelawareTibersoft Corporation
    
    MassachusettsWhiteFence, Inc.
    
    Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 2ND
QUARTER FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 4/30/98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  285,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,739
<INVENTORY>                                    461,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               777,227
<PP&E>                                         101,635
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 998,986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          615,446
<BONDS>                                          3,762
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          194,562
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   998,986
<SALES>                                      1,206,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,422,383
<CGS>                                        1,090,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,224,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
Converted by EDGARwiz


Exhibit 4.14
















CONSENT OF JÉRÔME LAVOIE







Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.




I, Jérôme Lavoie, participated in the preparation of the technical report entitled “Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2011 Exploration Program, Lac Pau Project, Québec” completed in March 2012 (the “Report”), concerning mineralized material in the Lac Pau property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings “Item III – Description of the Business – 3.5.4 Geological Setting; 3.5.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.5.6 Mineralization” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein). 




I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.







Very truly yours,










	
	/s/  Jérôme Lavoie


	Name:  Jérôme Lavoie, M.Sc., P.Eng.



















May 14, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1439

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
 under the Medicaid program of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

 Ms. Speier (for herself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Scanlon, 
 Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Mr. Cole) introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
 under the Medicaid program of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanded Genetic Screening Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL GENETIC SCREENING.

    Section 1905(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396d(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking at the end ``and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) non-invasive prenatal genetic screening for 
                pregnant women of all age groups (provided in a 
                facility, a home, or other setting);''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S**-**8 (Nos.333-130877, 333-127339, 333-71860, 333-71862, 333-93715, 333-93717, 333-89529 and 333-89533) of ourreports dated April 2, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Tween Brands,Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.123(R), *Share Based Payment*, on January 29, 2006), and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TweenBrands, Inc. and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPColumbus, OhioApril 2, 2007
78
14409

#### UNION BLEACHERY v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION

(189 S. E., 216)

*Mr. W. G.*Sirrine, for appellant,

*Messrs. John M. Daniel, Attorney General,*and *Claude K. Wingate,*for respondents,

*315January 6, 1937.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

Action against the South Carolina Tax Commission and the individual members thereof for recovery of documentary stamp taxes, $1,318.00, paid under protest by plaintiff-appellant, and for interest on the amount so paid from June 21, 1930.

The members of the Tax Commission demurred to the complaint on the ground that it stated no> cause of action against them as individuals. The circuit Judge sustained the demurrer, and the correctness of his ruling is admitted by appellant.

An behalf of the Tax Commission, a motion was made to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a suit cannot be brought against the State for recovery of documentary taxes, paid under protest, but that plaintiff-appellant should have gone into a court of equity and enjoined and restrained the collection thereof.

On the authority of the cases of *Santee River Cypress Lumber Company v. Query et al.,*168 S. C., 112, 167 S. E., 22, and *Federal Land Bang of Columbia v. State Highway Department,*172 S. C., 174, 173 S. E., 284, 288, Honorable G. Dewey Oxner, Circuit Judge, in a well-considered opinion, granted the *motion to*dismiss.

Appellant has appealed to this Court, and asks that the cases cited by Judge Oxner be reviewed and overruled.

Appellant’s counsel has filed an excellent and most persuasive argument. However, as stated by Mr. Justice Bonham, in writing the opinion of the Court in *Federal Land Bank of Coíumbia v. Highway Department, supra,*the case, of *Santee River Cypress Lumber Company v. Query et al.,*holds: “* * * if our lawmaking body desired and intended *316to give an adequate remedy at law for the recovery of illegal documentary taxes paid under protest by a taxpayer, and wished to prevent a court of equity from exercising its powers of injunction as to the collection of such taxes, very quickly, easily, and simply, the General Assembly could have amended the provisions of the act of 1928 to carry out fuly its intention. Its failure to amend in any respect section 29 of the act of 1928 (Code 1932, § 2548) seems to us to evidence the legislative intent to permit an aggrieved taxpayer to seek redress in the courts of equity.”

We feel bound by the former decisions of this Court, and therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Carter, Bonham and Fishburne concur.
2010-AUO-26 00:4 9 AM Rep. Greg g Harpe r 2022255797 810-100826-052 2/4 

307 Camton iloicere ^ffce iSuiUifns " aiSa£l(»ington. 9 C 20a|^ " 202-225-5031 

coMMrrrsES: HOUSE ADMINBTDAHON. BUOQET. JUOIOARV. AND JOINT COMMITTEE ON 

SUBCOMMITTEES: ELECnONSIHauMMnHnlitnikHii 

COURTS ft COMPEimON POUCY UuHdaivl ind IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, REFUGEES, BORDER SECU 

'HE UBRARY OF CONGRESS 

jny & INTERNATIONAL LAW Mudtdwyl 

August 25,2010 

Honorable Raymond LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I am writing in support of the Small Community Air Service Granfj application being submitted 

by the Jackson Municipal Airport Authority. 

The Jackson Municipal Airport, located in Jackson, Mississippi, 

government officials, regional businesses, and educational institutlbns 

across the state. The Authority will use this funding for marketing jpuiposes 

the local community of the services offered by the airport and the 

service to the region. Affordable access to air travel is a very powtjicfid 

development and also ensures small businesses and the general puplic 

to multiple markets to maximize their earning potential. 

pvides essential air service for 

m the Jackson area and 

and to better inform 

I |irlines that currently provide 

tool for economic 

in Mississippi have access 

I offer my support for the Small Community Air Service Grant ap|licati( 

Jackson Mimicipal Airport Authority. The Authority works ext 

services and meet the needs of the community, and I hope you wilj 

strong consideration. Again, thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

(jiegg 

Member of Cb^gress 

DBTmcromces 

: u 

— i 

~ - 1 

•u 

f-O 

c n 

en 

,—^ '•.J 1 

•-^o^ ^ 

rrj-^g m 

'-.r,^~* 

^ . j — ^ —n 

C/'J 

ion submitted by the 

sly hard to market the airport 

give their proposal your 

2S(I7-A Ou> BtMNOON ROAD 

Pliuii.M83U0B 

aoi.tsuAto 

823 22Na AVENUE 

MEROMN. MS 31301 

eaiM3.«eai 

STARKV U 

1 REKMC H Bouut MO, SUITE 20S 

STAmviOE. I B337E9 

662.324. iOO; 

BROOiOUVEH 

230 Soum UAimwOKiH STKEET 

BHOOKHAVEM. MS 39601 

601.823.3400 

pnNlEO ON RECrCLEO PAPER
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Corp of the West (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ThomasT. Hawker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 5, 2004 |   |                                   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | /s/  Thomas T. Hawker                  |   |
|                    |   | Thomas  T. Hawker                      |   |
|                    |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

1

----