alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James R. Lavelle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.'s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.


Date: January 6, 2003                           By: /s/ James R. Lavelle
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James R. Lavelle
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Ex-10.18(g)
Description of Charter Communications Long-Term Incentive Program
The Long-Term Incentive Program “LTIP,” administered under the Charter Communications,Inc. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, offers two forms of long-term, equity-based compensation— stock options and performance shares. Employees of Charter and its subsidiaries whosepay classifications exceed a certain level are eligible to receive options to purchaseshares of Class A common stock of Charter Communications, Inc. Employees who are moresenior are eligible to receive stock options and performance shares. Employees eligibleto receive performance shares receive awards of Charter stock that are earned based onCharter’s performance against company performance targets established by management andthe Compensation Committee of Charter’s Board of Directors.
For awards made during 2004, performance is measured over a three-yearperiod referred to as a performance cycle. The number of performance shares an employeeearns at the end of a three-year performance cycle depends on Charter’s performance inrelation to the targets. Financial Performance measures are calculated over a three-yearperiod, based on Revenue Growth and Unlevered Free Cash Flow. Revenue Growth is the annualcompound growth in our audited revenues excluding franchise fees. Unlevered Free Cash FlowGrowth is the annual compound growth in our Free Cash Flow excluding the effects of ourdebt and equity capital structure. This is calculated as Charter’s total revenues minusoperating, selling, and general and administrative expenses less capital expenditures.
For awards made beginning in March 2005, performance is measured over a one-yearperformance cycle. The number of performance shares an employee earns at the end of aone-year performance cycle depends on Charter’s performance in relation to the targets.Financial Performance measures are calculated over a one-year period, based on RevenueGrowth and Unlevered Free Cash Flow. Vesting of the performance shares occurs on the third anniversary of the grant date.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Vendome Service, Inc., Appellant.

Argued January 20, 1943;

decided March 4, 1943.

*644
      *Samuel L. Teitler*for appellant.

*William C. Chandler, Corporation Counsel (John D. J. Moore, Jr.,*and *Paxton Blair*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch. Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO
 18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 
 In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Corp of the West (the "Company")
          on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas T.
          Hawker,
          President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
          to 18
          U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
          Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
                  May 5, 2006
              By:/s/
                  Thomas T. HawkerThomas
                  T. HawkerPresident
                  andChief
                  Executive Officer
#### Ciprian Matei VLAD and Evelyn Klara Grim, AKA Evelyn Grim-Smout, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-70331

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

Filed October 2, 2017

John Carlos Barrera, Attorney, Acción Legal, PLLC, Nampa, ID, for Petitioner

Lindsay Dunn, Trial Attorney, David H. Wetmore, Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is. suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ciprian Matei Vlad and Evelyn Klara Grim, natives and citizens of Romania, petition for review of the Board of Immigra*489tion Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, and review de novo questions of law. *Tamang v. Holder,*598 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that petitioners are removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i} due to each having procured a visa through a fraudulent marriage, where the government presented clear and convincing evidence that they did not intend to establish a life with their respective United States citizen spouses at the inception of their marriages. *See Nakamoto v. Ashcroft,*363 F.3d 874, 881-82 (9th Cir. 2004) (in determining whether an alien entered into a marriage for the purpose of procuring admission into the United States, the focus of the inquiry is whether the couple intended to establish a life together at the time they were married; this court must affirm the IJ’s ruling unless the evidence is “so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the facts were as [the alien] alleged”).

To the extent petitioners contend the agency erred in considering evidence after the time of their respective marriages, this contention fails because such evidence may “bear on the subjective intent of the parties at the time they were married.” *Oropeza-Wong v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1135, 1148 (9th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted).

Petitioners’ contention that the BIA improperly shifted the burden of proof onto them is not supported by the record.

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioners’ unexhausted contentions that they were not given a proper individualized inquiry, and that the IJ improperly shifted the burden of proof onto them. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Nilsa N. Santiago, Respondent, v 679 Waring Avenue LLC, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 620]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about July 3, 2003, which restored plaintiffs case to the trial calendar and denied defendant’s application for further discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 4, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

This action was marked off the trial calendar due solely to circumstances connected to the reorganization of defendant’s *410insurance carrier. Generally, the failure to move to vacate a note of issue and certificate of readiness within 20 days of service constitutes a waiver of the right to conduct a subsequent physical examination, absent a showing of special circumstances or adequate reason for delay *(Sewell v Singh,*160 AD2d 592, 593 [1990]). In certain circumstances where no prejudice would result, a party may be relieved of its waiver *(Williams v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*147 AD2d 558, 559 [1989]). The record is devoid of any special circumstances or adequate excuse for the delay. Moreover, given that this matter has been on the trial calendar since March 2000, we cannot say that the 65-year-old plaintiff would not be prejudiced by further delay of the trial. Concur— Buckley, P.J, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Sullivan and Rosenberger, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Capital Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter W. Buckley, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|/s/    Walter W. Buckley, III                                
|                                                             
|Walter W. Buckley, III Chief Executive
Officer April 14, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6212 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6212

 To provide for a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and exploration on 
 the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida until 2032, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 3, 2023

 Mr. Rutherford (for himself, Mr. Waltz, Ms. Lois Frankel of Florida, 
  Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
 Gimenez, Ms. Salazar, Mr. Soto, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Mast, Mr. 
     Donalds, Mr. Dunn of Florida, Mr. Buchanan, and Mrs. Cammack) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and exploration on 
 the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Florida until 2032, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Recreation, Oceans, 
Tourism, Environment, and Coastal Towns in Florida Act'' or the 
``PROTECT Florida Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL AND GAS LEASING AND EXPLORATION ON THE OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF OFF COAST OF FLORIDA.

    (a) Extension of Gulf Coast Moratorium.--Section 104(a) of the Gulf 
of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 1331 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2032''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and may not issue a permit for oil and 
        gas exploration (as such term is defined in section 2 of the 
        Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act) in'' after ``related 
        activity''.
    (b) Establishment of Atlantic Coast Moratorium.--Section 12 of the 
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1431) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Moratorium on Oil and Gas Leasing and Seismic Testing Off the 
Coast of Florida.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may not offer for oil and 
        gas leasing, preleasing, or any related activity, including 
        seismic testing, and may not issue a permit for oil and gas 
        exploration in--
                    ``(A) any area in the Straits of Florida Planning 
                Area; and
                    ``(B) any area in the South Atlantic Planning Area 
                that is south of the northernmost lateral seaward 
                administrative boundary of the State of Florida.
            ``(2) Application.--This subsection shall apply during the 
        period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and 
        ending on June 30, 2029.''.
                                 <all>
```
ex10-3.htm







EXHIBIT 10.3







AMENDMENT NO. 2







TO THE







GEORGIA-CAROLINA BANCSHARES, INC. DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends (the “Amendment”) the Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. Directors Equity Incentive Plan (formerly the Directors Stock Purchase Plan) (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective October 26, 2009, and as amended on January 23, 2012, as set forth herein.







1. Background Information. The Company established the Plan effective as of June 2001, amended and restated the Plan effective as of October 26, 2009, and amended the Plan effective as of January 23, 2012. Section 10 of the Plan provides that the Company may, at any time, modify the Plan. The board of directors of the Company wishes to modify the Plan as set forth in this Amendment to provide for an increase in the amount of the common stock, $.001 par value, of the Company that is available for sale and issuance to eligible participants under the Plan, from the currently authorized 126,801 shares (adjusted for all stock splits) to a total of 300,000 authorized shares.







2. Amendment to Preamble. The following sentence in the Preamble of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety:







“The Company originally authorized the sale and issuance of fifty thousand (50,000) shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of this Plan;” and is replaced with the following:







“The Company hereby authorizes the sale and issuance of 300,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms of this Plan.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (“Morton’s”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Allen J. Bernstein, the Chief Executive Officer of Morton’s, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Morton’s.

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | /s/ ALLEN J.  BERNSTEIN |   |
|                     | Allen J.  Bernstein |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Baldomero GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ, also known as Juan Gonzalez-Ramirez, also known as Ivan Gonzalez, also known as Antonio De La Cruz, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-50224 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 18, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. At'torney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Baldomero Gonzalez-Ramirez, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Baldomero Gonzalez-Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Ramirez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Ramirez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except Under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. DiNella, the Chief Financial Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.

Date: August 2, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA  
|Ronald M. DiNella      
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of Blockbuster Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John F. Antioco, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 15, 2004

/s/ JOHN F. ANTIOCOJohn F. AntiocoChairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Blockbuster Inc. and will be retained by Blockbuster Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1








Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Section 302 Certification





I, Gary L. Nalbandian, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Metro Bancorp, Inc. (the registrant);




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




Date: April 30, 2015





/s/ Gary L. Nalbandian


Gary L. Nalbandian


President and Chief Executive Officer
Docket Number FAA-2014-0140