alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.7**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
          In connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Properties Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig J. Laurie, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         By:      /s/ Craig J. Laurie    Craig J. Laurie    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
March 31, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03831]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17348 and #17349; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-
00068]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Hawaii

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of HAWAII (FEMA-4639-
DR), dated 02/15/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Landslides.
    Incident Period: 12/05/2021 through 12/10/2021.

DATES: Issued on 02/15/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/18/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/15/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/15/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: City of Honolulu, Honolulu, Maui.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available                   1.875
   Elsewhere............................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available                1.875
   Elsewhere............................................
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available                1.875
   Elsewhere............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17348 B 
and for economic injury is 17349 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-03831 Filed 2-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Omar Orlando RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41544 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 9, 2017

*360Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Omar Orlando Rodriguez, Pro Se

Before KING, SMITH, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Omar Orlando Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XIRCOM,
INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         117,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,616
<INVENTORY>                                     16,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,479
<PP&E>                                          54,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,068
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,202
<SALES>                                         97,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,684
<CGS>                                           55,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 3RD
QUARTER FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 4/30/98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,279
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,224
<INVENTORY>                                    515,141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               850,436
<PP&E>                                         110,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,079,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          687,079
<BONDS>                                          2,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          194,586
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,079,251
<SALES>                                      1,781,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,125,747
<CGS>                                        1,610,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,821,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,565
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        


</TABLE>
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF Page 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0394

DAN H. WOOODARDS, JR.,

 Plaintiff/Appellant,

 v.

GARY WOODARDS, CAROL WOOD, 

TERRI LASELL, BARBARA WOODARDS,

ESTATE OF DAN HOOVER WOODARDS, 

SR., and ESTATE OF DORIS WOODARDS.

 Defendants/Respondents.

 

 ORDER 

Having reviewed Appellant Dan H. Woodards, Jr.’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Appellant’s Reply Brief and good cause appearing therefrom,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s motion is GRANTED and his reply brief shall 

be filed no later than January 11, 2024.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 27 2023

12/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0394
B.G. and D.P. v. H.W.

2150913

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Curtis Louis SANGSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WAKE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7773

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

Curtis L. Sangster, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Louis Sangster, a state pretrial detainee, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sangster has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of. appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT







I, Sangeon Park, Chief Financial Officer of MB Tech, Inc. ( the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



-    the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended

December 31, 2003 (the " Report") fully complies with the requirements of

Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C.

78m or 78o (d); and



-    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:    May 3, 2004









/s/ Sangeon Park

Sangeon Park

Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert J. Blum, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Frey *&*Horgan Corporation, Despondent, *v.*Fresh Grown Preserve Corporation, Appellant.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 22, 1943.

*760
      *Robert J. Blum,*in person, for motion.

*Isador Goetz*opposed.

Motion denied with leave to renew npon proof that no judgment has been entered in the office of the Clerk of the County npon the decision of the Appellate Division .before the notice of appeal was served. If such judgment has been entered, errors in description may be disregarded. (See 290 N. Y. 857.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 20

- 00104

- CV

Russell CALLAHAN

, Appellant

v.

Barbara Susan JUDKINS

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI05321

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellant’s motion to dismiss is

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed aga inst the appellant,

Russell Callahan

.

SIGNED April 22, 2020.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          37,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,119
<INVENTORY>                                      5,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,028
<PP&E>                                           5,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           887
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,609
<SALES>                                         65,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,121
<CGS>                                           46,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
        

</TABLE>
#### 138-19th Street, Jackson Heights, Inc., Appellant, *v.*Roscoe H. Canaday, Respondent.

Argued February 24, 1943;

decided April 8, 1943.

*673
      *Samuel Shapiro*for appellant.

*Samuel Lippman*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blockbuster Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 6, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Thomas M. Casey, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 3. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 6, 2008



/s/ Thomas M. CaseyThomas M. Casey Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elliott BROWN, a/k/a Ta Dow, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6097

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 26, 2017

Elliott Brown, Appellant Pro Se. James Thomas Wallner, Assistant United States Attorney, Christopher M. Mason, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Elliott Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*118We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
1 

### Sutton, Tia

From: Achanta, Chandana L. <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.g ov> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:02 PM To: Spears, Matthew; Hengst, Benjamin; Sutton, Tia; Tim othy.Mullins@dot.gov; 'james.tamm@dot.gov' (james.tamm@dot.gov) Cc: Whiteman, Chad Subject: Summary of working interagency comments received un der EO 12866 review of EPA/NHTSA HD NPRM Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments Received on EO 1286 6 Review of Draft Heavy Duty Vehicles NPRM.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Completed



### Hi All,

Attached are follow-up EO 12866 interagency comm ents received on the draft joint EPA/NHTSA proposed rule, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Stand ards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Work T rucks -- Phase 2,” EPA RIN 2060-AS16 - NHTSA RIN 2127-AL52. These are subject to further policy review.

Thanks Chandana
`EXHIBIT 32.1

                           NATIONAL AUTO CREDIT, INC.
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, James J. McNamara, Chief Executive Officer of National Auto Credit, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), in connection with the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), do
hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ James J. McNamara
--------------------------------------------
Name:  James J. McNamara
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date:  September 12, 2005

















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to National Auto Credit, Inc. and
will be retained by National Auto Credit, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.`
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Blockbuster Inc. Subsidiaries**

Ardnasillagh Ltd. 

Blockbuster Argentina, S.A. 

Blockbuster Australia Pty. Ltd. 

Blockbuster Canada Co. 

Blockbuster Canada Inc. 

Blockbuster de Mexico, SA de CV 

Blockbuster Distribution, Inc. 

Blockbuster Entertainment Limited 

Blockbuster Entertainment (Ireland)Limited 

Blockbuster Global Services Inc. 

Blockbuster HoldingsIreland 

Blockbuster International Spain Inc. 

BlockbusterInternational (Taiwan) B.V. 

Blockbuster Investments LLC 

Blockbuster Italia, S.p.A. 

Blockbuster Limited Partner Holdings LLC 

Blockbuster Procurement LP 

Blockbuster Texas LP 

Blockbuster UK Limited 

Blockbuster Uruguay Ltda. 

Blockbuster Video Danmark A/S 

Blockbuster Video Espana S.L. 

Blockbuster Video International Corporation (Chile) Ltda. 

Blockbuster Video Italy, Inc. 

Cityvision Limited 

Direcorp, S.A. de D.V. 

EntretenT a Domicilo, S. de R.L. 

Games Station Limited 

Sercorp, S.A. de C.V. 

Trading Zone Inc. 

Xtra-Vision Limited