alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Science 
Advisory Board for Biosecurity.
    The meeting will be held as a virtual meeting and is open to the 
public as indicated below. Individuals who plan to view the virtual 
meeting and need special assistance or other reasonable accommodations 
to view the meeting should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be 
accessed from the NIH Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov/).

    Name of Committee: National Science Advisory Board for 
Biosecurity.
    Date: February 28, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity 
meeting will include a review of the charge to the committee and 
discussion of next steps for the committee.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, 
Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting Link is available at 
https://osp.od.nih.gov/biotechnology/national-science-advisory-board-for-biosecurity-nsabb/#meetings).
    Contact Person: Cari Young, Office of Science Policy, National 
Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-9838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3f0c0cac6cdc0c6f3cccfcac0dae3ccc78dcdcacb8dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efbc8c868a818c8abf8083868c96af808bc1818687c1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments by forwarding 
the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice at least 
two days prior to the meeting date. The statement should include the 
name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or 
professional affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the NIH Office of Science 
Policy's web page: https://osp.od.nih.gov/biotechnology/national-science-advisory-board-for-biosecurity-nsabb/, where an agenda, link 
to the webcast meeting, and any additional information for the 
meeting will be posted when available.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling difficulties.

    Dated: February 14, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03406 Filed 2-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tayron Pascual Rojas GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-11357 Non-Argument Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

(March 6, 2017)

Peter J. Sholl, Arthur Lee Bentley, III, Joseph K. Ruddy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Tayron Pascual Rojas Garcia, Coleman, FL, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David Hardy, appointed counsel for Tay-ron Rojas Garcia, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rojas Gar*984cia’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.A



CERTIFICATION



I, John D. Bair, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation;



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report); and



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004  
|                       
|/s/ John D. Bair       
|Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00223

- CV

Maria Lidia GONZALEZ et al

,

Appellant

v.

ESTATE OF IDELFONSO RAMIREZ

,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6215

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellees ’ unopposed third motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to July 5, 2018. No further extensions of time will be allowed.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of June, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### BRAUER *v.*MITCHELL.

Brokers- — Commission—Performance by Buyer.

Plaintiff real estate broker was entitled to commission where record supported trial court’s finding that buyer was always ready to perform agreement.

Reference for Points in Headnote

12 Am Jur 2d, Brokers §§ 157, 183, 248.

Appeal from Washtenaw, Breakey (James R., Jr.), J.

Submitted Division 2 May 8, 1968, at Lansing.

(Docket No. 2,835.)

Decided May 31, 1968.

Leave to appeal denied October 3, 1968.

See 381 Mich 781.

Complaint by Carl A. Brauer against Ronald E. Mitchell and Diane A. Mitchell for a real estate *573commission. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

*Crippen, Dever S Urquhart,*for plaintiff.

*Jacic J. Garris,*for defendants.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff broker sued defendant seller for a real estate commission and had a judgment for $17,700. Defendant appeals.

By sales agreement, defendant seller agreed to pay plaintiff broker a real estate commission. The trial court found, and the record supports the finding, that the buyer was always ready to perform the agreement and the broker is entitled to his commission.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Lesinski, C. J., and Quinn and Moody, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,471,759
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,953,337
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 44,902,932
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    307,350,210
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,799,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             382,815,677
<DEPOSITS>                                 265,841,506
<SHORT-TERM>                                51,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,628,850
<LONG-TERM>                                 27,652,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,652,722
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             382,815,677
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,709,072
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,552,379
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,261,451
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,949,889
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,816,418
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,445,033
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,222,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,069,464
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,069,464
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,011,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.54
<LOANS-NON>                                    836,632
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,776,539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   39,032
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,556
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,799,063
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,799,063
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. EARL LATSHA LUMBER COMPANY. EARL LATSHA LUMBER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

Nos. 15912, 15960.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 18, 1966.

Decided Oct. 27, 1966.

Morton Namrow, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N. L. R. B., on the brief), for the Board.

Louis J. Adler, Harrisburg, Pa., for Earl Latsha Lumber Co.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

These are petitions by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Earl Latsha Lumber Company, and by the Lumber Company to review and set aside the order. The order was entered upon the Board’s finding that the Lumber Company had coercively interrogated employees and discharged one of them in the presence of the others because of his union activities, in violation of section 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and had discharged six other employees because of their union activities, in violation of that section and of section 8(a) (3) of the Act. The Lumber Company attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support these findings. Our examination of the record, however, satisfies us that substantial evidence which the Board was entitled to, and did, credit supports the fiiidings. We may not, therefore, set them aside.

*217The Lumber Company also raises the procedural objections that the Board refused to grant its motion for a more definite statement of the complaint, that the Board refused to grant its request for oral argument before the Board, and that the Board denied its motion for reconsideration, rehearing and reopening of the record based on a letter subsequently received from one of the complaining witnesses. We find each of these objections to be without merit as is the Lumber Company’s motion in this court for an order permitting it to introduce before the Board the additional evidence of the witness in question.

The motion for leave to introduce additional evidence before the Board will be denied.

A decree enforcing the order of the Board will be entered.
J.S., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-266

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

J.S., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 37683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part F of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations 
of Authority for the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers 
for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), (Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 
64, pp. 18555-18556, dated April 4, 2011) is amended to reflect updates 
to the functions of the Center for Strategic Planning.
    Part F. is described below:
     Section FC. 20 (Functions) reads as follows:

Center for Strategic Planning (FCK)

     Directs and oversees the strategic planning process to 
achieve CMS strategic aims and goals, through a collaborative process 
with internal and external partners.
     Obtains understanding and concurrence of CMS senior 
management, the Principal Deputy Administrator, and the CMS 
Administrator on long term strategic plans and goals, and timelines and 
actions steps to be taken to achieve strategic aims and goals.
     Performs environmental scans and gap analysis on CMS 
strategic imperatives and enterprise goals.
     Integrates and aligns CMS strategic plans with Department 
of Health and Human Services' 5-year strategic plan and performance 
goals.
     Provides senior leadership over the strategic planning 
process and the development of CMS strategic goals, metrics, and plans.
     Confers with CMS' Centers, Offices and Regions to 
facilitate the development and update of strategic plans and 
performance goals.
     Oversees the CMS Challenge Competition, working with 
components to plan, organize, implement and report on CMS Challenge 
Competitions.
     Manages and coordinates internal and external inquiries 
regarding CSP activities.

    Dated: June 14, 2012.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator and Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Medicare 
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-15306 Filed 6-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
```
#### ULUFALE, Plaintiff v. AIVAO, Defendant

No. 5-1920

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division [Land: “Lepapa”]

June 6, 1921

Before A. M. NOBLE, *Associate Judge*

JUDGMENT

This cause coming on to be heard and it appearing to the *323court that the matters in controversy have been amicably settled between the parties, plaintiff and defendant.

It is therefore ordered, considered and adjudged, by and with the consent of the parties, plaintiff and defendant, that the Ulufale family, under the control of the name “ULUFALE,” is the owner of the land “Lepapa”; that the defendant entered upon the land “Lepapa: through and with the consent of the plaintiff “Ulufale,” the said defendant being a member of the Ulufale family (not the name “Aivao” being a branch of the Ulufale family, but the defendant personally being a member of the Ulufale family); and that having gone upon the land “Lepapa” with the consent of the plaintiff Ulufale, and having made improvements thereon, the defendant is entitled to the use of said land. Plaintiff pay cost of action $10.00.

Consented to by,

/s/ Ulufale, Plaintiff

/s/ Aivao, Defendant

Interpreter,

/s/ G. Peters, Government Interpreter
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MIGUEL PEREZ, III, a/k/a, )

MIGUEL ANGEL PEREZ, DOC #P90128, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4679

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 16, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco

County; Declan Mansfield and Kimberly 

Campbell, Judges.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Miguel Perez, III, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         130,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,052,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                   960,921
<INVENTORY>                                     97,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,025,415
<PP&E>                                      11,468,252
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,904,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,250,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,779,665
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,000,000
<COMMON>                                        99,004
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,080,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,250,102
<SALES>                                     13,978,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,978,170
<CGS>                                       10,799,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,799,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,223,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               173,867
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             748,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (967,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (967,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
#### Mary Lincoln Candies, Inc., et al., Respondents, *v.*Department of Labor of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 22, 1943.

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 289 N. Y. 262.)
EXHIBIT 32.1


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Excalibur Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10KQSB for the year ending December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Larry C. Shumate, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Larry C. Shumate
--------------------
Larry C. Shumate, Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Corp of the West(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R.Dale McKinney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August  9, 2004 | /s/ R. Dale McKinney                                       |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | R. Dale McKinney                                           |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----