68638 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2010–18–02, Amendment 39–16415 (75 

FR 52240, August 25, 2010), and adding 

the following new AD: 

2011–23–01 Thielert Aircraft Engines 

GmbH: Amendment 39–16852; Docket 

No. FAA–2010–0683; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–NE–25–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective November 22, 2011. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2010–18–02, 

Amendment 39–16415, (75 FR 52240, August 

25, 2010). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Thielert Aircraft 

Engines GmbH (TAE): 

(1) TAE 125–01 reciprocating engines 

(commercial designation Centurion 1.7), all 

serial numbers (S/Ns), if a clutch assembly 

part number (P/N) 02–7210–11001R13 is 

installed, and 

(2) TAE 125–02–99 reciprocating engines 

(commercial designation Centurion 2.0), all 

S/Ns, if a clutch assembly P/N 05–7211– 

K006001 or P/N 05–7211–K006002 is 

installed. 

(d) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by TAE identifying 

additional clutch assemblies that could fail 

with nonconforming disc springs. These 

failures could lead to engine in-flight 

shutdown and loss of control of the airplane. 

We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe 

condition on these products. 

(e) Actions and Compliance 

Unless already done, do the following 

actions. 

(1) After the effective date of this AD, for 

clutch assembly P/N 02–7210–11001R13, 

P/N 05–7211–K006001 and P/N 05–7211– 

K006002, with an S/N listed in TAE Service 

Bulletin (SB) No. TM TAE 125–0021, 

Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011, or SB No. 

TM TAE 125–1011 P1, Revision 2, dated 

August 31, 2011, do the following: 

(i) For engines with affected clutch 

assemblies that have accumulated 100 flight 

hours or more on the effective date of this 

AD, replace the clutch assembly before 

further flight. 

(ii) For engines with affected clutch 

assemblies that have accumulated less than 

100 flight hours on the effective date of this 

AD, replace the clutch assembly before 

accumulating 100 flight hours. 

(2) After the effective date of this AD: 

(i) Do not install an engine having a clutch 

assembly that is listed by S/N in TAE SB No. 

TM TAE 125–0021, Revision 1, dated August 

17, 2011, or SB No. TM TAE 125–1011 P1, 

Revision 2, dated August 31, 2011, and 

(ii) Do not install any clutch assembly 

listed by S/N in TAE SB No. TM TAE 125– 

0021, Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011, or 

SB No. TM TAE 125–1011 P1, Revision 2, 

dated August 31, 2011, into any engine. 

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, 

FAA, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to 

make your request. 

(g) Related Information 

(1) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2011–0152– 

E, dated August 18, 2011, for related 

information. 

(2) Contact Alan Strom, Aerospace 

Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, 

Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New 

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 

01803; email: alan.strom@faa.gov; phone: 

(781) 238–7143; fax: (781) 238–7199, for 

more information about this AD. 

(h) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) You must use Thielert Aircraft Engines 

GmbH Service Bulletin No. TM TAE 125– 

0021, Revision 1, dated August 17, 2011, and 

Service Bulletin No. TM TAE 125–1011 P1, 

Revision 2, dated August 31, 2011, to identify 

the affected clutch assemblies requiring 

replacement by this AD. 

(2) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Thielert Aircraft Engines 

GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14 D–09350, 

Lichtenstein, Germany; phone: +49–37204– 

696–0; fax: +49–37204–696–55; email: 

info@centurion-engines.com. 

(4) You may review copies at the FAA, 

New England Region, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

(202) 741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

October 19, 2011. 

Peter A. White, 

Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–28672 Filed 11–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0773; FRL–9487–6] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Revision to Nitrogen Oxides Budget 

Trading Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). The revision pertains to regulatory 

language in its nitrogen oxides (NOX) 

Budget Trading Program that 

inadvertently ended its NOX budget at 

the end of the 2008 ozone season. EPA 

is approving this revision in accordance 

with the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on January 

6, 2012 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse written comment 

by December 7, 2011. If EPA receives 

such comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2011–0773 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2011–0773, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, 

Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2011– 

0773. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 68639 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD-ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by 

email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. On September 27, 2010, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Department 

of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) 

submitted a formal revision to its State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The SIP revision pertains to the NOX

budget established in Virginia 

regulation 9VAC5 Chapter 140 Part I 

(NOX Budget Trading Program), which 

was adopted by the Commonwealth and 

approved into its SIP to meet the 

requirements of the NOX SIP Call. 

Virginia determined that regulatory 

language inadvertently ended the State 

budget at the end of the 2008 ozone 

season. Because the NOX SIP Call 

requirements continue to apply to the 

affected states, revision of the applicable 

end date in regulation 9VAC5 Chapter 

140, Part I is required in order for the 

budget to apply to ozone season 2009 

and beyond. It should be noted that 

Virginia has continued to comply with 

the requirements of the NOX SIP Call 

through its approved Clean Air 

Interstate Rule (CAIR) NOX Ozone 

Season Trading Program at 9VAC5 

Chapter 140, Part III. As explained in 

the preamble for CAIR (70 FR 25162, 

May 12, 2005), states could meet the 

requirements of the NOX SIP Call by 

achieving all of the emissions 

reductions required under CAIR from 

electric generating units (EGUs) by 

participating in the CAIR Ozone Season 

NOX Trading Program, and by bringing 

its non-EGUs that were participating in 

the NOX SIP Call Budget Trading 

Program into the CAIR Ozone Season 

NOX Trading Program using the same 

non-EGU budget and applicability 

requirements that were in their NOX SIP 

Call Budget Trading Program. Virginia 

chose to implement its CAIR ozone 

season NOX obligations by participating 

in the CAIR Ozone Season NOX Trading 

Program and brought their non-EGUs 

into this program, which was approved 

into the Virginia SIP on December 28, 

2007 (72 FR 73602). 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On September 27, 2010, VADEQ 

submitted a SIP revision that extends 

the NOX SIP Call budget beyond the 

2008 ozone season. The SIP revision 

consists of amendments to sections 5– 

140–900, 5–140–920, and 5–140–930 

that extend the EGU NOX budget of 

17,091 tons and the non-EGU budget of 

4,104 tons to the 2009 ozone season and 

each ozone season thereafter. 

III. General Information Pertaining to 

SIP Submittals From the 

Commonwealth of Virginia 

In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation 

that provides, subject to certain 

conditions, for an environmental 

assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for 

voluntary compliance evaluations 

performed by a regulated entity. The 

legislation further addresses the relative 

burden of proof for parties either 

asserting the privilege or seeking 

disclosure of documents for which the 

privilege is claimed. Virginia’s 

legislation also provides, subject to 

certain conditions, for a penalty waiver 

for violations of environmental laws 

when a regulated entity discovers such 

violations pursuant to a voluntary 

compliance evaluation and voluntarily 

discloses such violations to the 

Commonwealth and takes prompt and 

appropriate measures to remedy the 

violations. Virginia’s Voluntary 

Environmental Assessment Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides 

a privilege that protects from disclosure 

documents and information about the 

content of those documents that are the 

product of a voluntary environmental 

assessment. The Privilege Law does not 

extend to documents or information (1) 

that are generated or developed before 

the commencement of a voluntary 

environmental assessment; (2) that are 

prepared independently of the 

assessment process; (3) that demonstrate 

a clear, imminent and substantial 

danger to the public health or 

environment; or (4) that are required by 

law. 

On January 12, 1998, the 

Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the 

Attorney General provided a legal 

opinion that states that the Privilege 

Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, 

precludes granting a privilege to 

documents and information ‘‘required 

by law,’’ including documents and 

information ‘‘required by Federal law to 

maintain program delegation, 

authorization or approval,’’ since 

Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally 

authorized environmental programs in a 

manner that is no less stringent than 

their Federal counterparts. * * *’’ The 

opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding 

§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or 

other information needed for civil or 

criminal enforcement under one of these 

programs could not be privileged 

because such documents and 

information are essential to pursuing 

enforcement in a manner required by 

Federal law to maintain program 

delegation, authorization or approval.’’ 

Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 

10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the extent 

consistent with requirements imposed 

by Federal law,’’ any person making a 

voluntary disclosure of information to a 

state agency regarding a violation of an 

environmental statute, regulation, 

permit, or administrative order is 

granted immunity from administrative 

or civil penalty. The Attorney General’s 

January 12, 1998 opinion states that the 

quoted language renders this statute 

inapplicable to enforcement of any 

Federally authorized programs, since 

‘‘no immunity could be afforded from 

administrative, civil, or criminal 

penalties because granting such 

immunity would not be consistent with 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
68640 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

Federal law, which is one of the criteria 

for immunity.’’ 

Therefore, EPA has determined that 

Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity 

statutes will not preclude the 

Commonwealth from enforcing its 

program consistent with the Federal 

requirements. In any event, because 

EPA has also determined that a state 

audit privilege and immunity law can 

affect only state enforcement and cannot 

have any impact on Federal 

enforcement authorities, EPA may at 

any time invoke its authority under the 

CAA, including, for example, sections 

113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the 

requirements or prohibitions of the state 

plan, independently of any state 

enforcement effort. In addition, citizen 

enforcement under section 304 of the 

CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or 

any, state audit privilege or immunity 

law. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving the SIP revision 

submitted by VADEQ on September 27, 

2009 that extends the NOX SIP Call 

budget beyond the 2008 ozone season. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

amendment and anticipates no adverse 

comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed 

Rules’’ section of today’s Federal 

Register, EPA is publishing a separate 

document that will serve as the proposal 

to approve the SIP revision if adverse 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective on January 6, 2012 without 

further notice unless EPA receives 

adverse comment by December 7, 2011. 

If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA 

will publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. EPA 

will address all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. Please note that 

if EPA receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by January 6, 2012. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action to 

extend Virginia’s budget under the NOX

SIP Call may not be challenged later in 

proceedings to enforce its requirements. 

(See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: October 25, 2011. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 40 CFR 

part 52 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart VV—Virginia 

■ 2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entries 

for Sections 5–140–900, 5–140–920, and 

5–140–930 to read as follows: 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 68641 

§ 52.2420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation [former SIP 

citation] 

*******

9 VAC 5, 

Chapter 140 

State trading program budget 

Part I NOX Budget Trading Program 

*******

Article 10 State Trading Program Budget and Compliance Supplement Pool 

5–140–900 ................. State trading program budget ........... 12/31/08 11/7/11 [Insert page number where 

the document begins].

Revise applicable year to 

2004 and each year thereafter. 

* * * * * * * 

5–140–920 ................. Total electric generating unit allocations.12/31/08 11/7/11 [Insert page number where 

the document begins].

Add subsection B, which extends the NOX budget beyond 2008. 

5–140–930 ................. Total non-electric generating unit allocations.12/31/08 11/7/11 [Insert page number where 

the document begins].

Add subsection B, which extends the NOX budget beyond 2008. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–28640 Filed 11–4–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 1 and 43 

[WC Docket No. 07–38; FCC 08–89, 08–148] 

Development of Nationwide Broadband 

Data To Evaluate Reasonable and 

Timely Deployment of Advanced 

Services to All Americans, 

Improvement of Wireless Broadband 

Subscribership Data, and Development 

of Data on Interconnected Voice over 

Internet Protocol (VoIP) 

Subscribership 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission published a document in 

the Federal Register that contained new 

information collection requirements. 

This document announces that, on 

January 30, 2009, the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) gave 

approval for these information 

requirements contained in the 

Commission’s Report and Order and 

Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 

as well as the Order on Reconsideration, 

Development of Nationwide Broadband 

Data To Evaluate Reasonable and 

Timely Deployment of Advanced 

Services to All Americans, Improvement 

of Wireless Broadband Subscribership 

Data, and Development of Data on 

Interconnected Voice over Internet 

Protocol (VoIP) Subscribership. 

DATES: The amendments to 47 CFR 

1.7001 and 47 CFR 43.11 in the final 

rule published July 2, 2008, at 73 FR 

37869 are effective November 7, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeremy Miller, Industry Analysis and 

Technology Division, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, at (202) 418–1507, 

or via the Internet at 

jeremy.miller@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Federal Communications Commission 

has received OMB approval for the rules 

contained in information collection 

OMB Control No. 3060–0816, Local 

Telephone Competition and Broadband 

Reporting. The information collection 

was adopted in two orders: (1) The 

Report and Order and Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, Development of 

Nationwide Broadband Data To 

Evaluate Reasonable and Timely 

Deployment of Advanced Services to 

All Americans, Improvement of 

Wireless Broadband Subscribership 

Data, and Development of Data on 

Interconnected Voice over Internet 

Protocol (VoIP) Subscribership in WC 

Docket No. 07–38, which appears at 73 

FR 37869, July 2, 2008, and (2) the 

Order on Reconsideration, Development 

of Nationwide Broadband Data To 

Evaluate Reasonable and Timely 

Deployment of Advanced Services to 

All Americans, Improvement of 

Wireless Broadband Subscribership 

Data, and Development of Data on 

Interconnected Voice over Internet 

Protocol (VoIP) Subscribership in WC 

Docket No. 07–38, which appears at 73 

FR 37861, July 2, 2008. These 

information requests required OMB 

approval to be effective. Through this 

document, the Commission announces 

that it has received this approval (OMB 

Control No. 3060–0816, Expiration Date: 

April 30, 2013), and that the adopted 

rules are in effect. Pursuant to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13, an agency may not 

conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid control number. 

Notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall be subject to any 

penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information subject to the 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES