alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WATERMARC
FOOD MANAGEMENT CO. 10-Q FOR ITS FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q REPORT.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<CASH>                                          77,453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    438,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,852,089
<PP&E>                                       5,592,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,593,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,994,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    329,540
<COMMON>                                       713,161
<OTHER-SE>                                   (239,338)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,593,575
<SALES>                                     10,868,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,868,076
<CGS>                                        3,448,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,848,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             185,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (516,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (516,337)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (516,337)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
| 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ PATRICK GOEPEL           |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Patrick Goepel                                                                 |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                        |   |
|   |   | May 17, 2010                                                                   |   |
Exhibit 10.5


 


 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


SEEDO CORP.


 


The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held on this 21st day of February, 2019


 


The Board of Directors which was present for this meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Zohar Levy 


Micha Maman 


Jendayi Frazer


 


WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to enter into a certain Share Purchase Agreement and Convertible Debenture with YAII PN, LTD.


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the corporation having considered this matter, has opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, has decided unanimously and RESOLVED:


 


That the Company shall Execute said obligatory documents with YAII PN LTD. for funding purposes, and deems such action in the best interest of the Company.


 


Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records


 


DATED: 21st February, 2019


 











Zohar Levy, Director, CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, March 18, 2022, 10:00 a.m. to March 18, 2022, 07:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 08, 2022, FR Doc 2122-02527, V-87, Number 26, Page 7194.                

Meeting is being amended to change the Contact Person from James Li to David Filpula, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 17, 2022. 

David W. Freeman, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-03820 Filed 2-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.7



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 333-175265, 333-155538 and 333-113073 on Form S-8, and No. 333-159215 on Form F-3 and to the use
of our reports dated March 4, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Brookfield Office Properties
Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013.





/s/Deloitte LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants



Toronto, Canada
March 31, 2014
DRAFT AGENDA

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)

FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL (SAP)

OPEN MEETING

April 19-21, 2016

FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/

DOCKET NUMBER: EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0062

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

CONFERENCE CENTER LOBBY LEVEL

ONE POTOMAC YARD (SOUTH BLDG.)

2777 S. CRYSTAL DRIVE, ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Chlorpyrifos: Analysis of Biomonitoring Data Please note that all

times are approximate (see note at end of Agenda).

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy (OSCP), EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D.,

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Welcome and Opening Remarks – Jack Housenger, Director, Office of Pesticides

Programs (OPP), EPA

9:25 A.M. EPA Presentations

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. EPA Presentations

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont’d)

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont’d)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Day 1

Tuesday April, 19 2016
9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D.,

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day presentations

9:40 A.M. Public Comments

10:30 A.M. Break

10:40 A.M. Public Comments (Cont’d)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. Charge to Panel

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. Charge to Panel

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Day 2

Wednesday, April 20, 2016
9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures – Fred Jenkins, Ph.D.,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members – James McManaman, Ph.D.,

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day discussions

9:30 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont’d)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Please be advised that agenda times are approximate; when the discussion for one topic is

completed, discussions for the next topic will begin. For further information, please contact

the Designated Federal Official for this meeting, Dr. Fred Jenkins, via telephone: (202) 564-

3327; fax: (202) 564-8382; or email: jenkins.fred@epa.gov.

Day 3

Thursday, April 21, 2016
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 19

- 30130

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus
Thomas A. Nelson, Jr.,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:16

- CV

- 782

Before Higginbotham, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Thomas A. Nelson, Jr. moved to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the basis that constitutionally ineffective counsel caused him to reject a plea offer and to stand trial

. The district court denied Nelson’s

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except u nder the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 3, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30130 Document: 00515846256 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2021No. 19

- 30130

2 motion, finding that he did not show prejudice from any alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. 1 We granted a certificate of appealability on this claim. Whether counsel was constitutionally ineffective is a mixed question of law and fact that we review de novo

. United States v. Phea , 953 F.3d 838, 841 (5th Cir. 2020). W e “ independently apply[] the law to the facts found by the district court, as long as the district court ’ s factual determinations are not clearly erroneous.” Ramirez v. Dretke , 396 F.3d 646, 649 (5th Cir. 2005). To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, Nelson must show that his counsel’s performance was deficient and the deficiency caused prejudice. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984)

. Because Nelson alleg es that deficient counsel caused him to reject a plea agreement, to show prejudice he must demonstrate that : (1) but for the ineffective counsel , there is a reasonable probability that he would have accepted the plea; (2) the court would have accepted its terms; and (3) the conviction or sentence would have been less severe. Lafler v. Cooper , 566 U.S. 156, 164 (2012). The district court made a factual finding that Nelson would have insisted on going to trial regardless of his attorney’s advice

. After

co nsidering the parties’ briefs, record, and oral arguments, we conclude that the record supports th is fact ual finding

. Because there is no reasonable probability that Nelson would have pled guilty , he failed to show prejudice

. See id . W e may affirm on that basis without evaluating whether counsel ’s performance was deficient

. See Strickland , 466 U.S. at 697.

A FFIRMED

.

1 The district court also denied relief on the basis that the conviction was invalid under McDonnell v. United States , 136 S. Ct. 2355 (2016). At oral argument, Nelson ’s counsel withdrew his claims under McDonnell

. Case: 19-30130 Document: 00515846256 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2021
Consent of David W. Rennie
 
 I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the New Afton Project, British Columbia, Canada” dated December 31, 2009, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.
 
   
  
 "David W. Rennie"Name:
David W. Rennie, P. Eng.Title:
Principal Geologist
James FLOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-539

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

James Floyd, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF PINNACLE
DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006.

I, George A. Troutman, certify that,
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of November 14, 2006.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George A. Troutman 
|Chief Financial Officer



32
#### LIANJU YANG, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60619 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 12, 2017

Donglai Yang, Law Office of Donglai Yang, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner

Christina Petersen Greer, Stefanie N. Hennes, Trial Attorneys, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lianju Yang petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). He challenges the denial of relief from removal, including applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

Lianju Yang’s brief, through counsel Donglai Yang, is virtually identical to the brief he filed with the BIA. The brief devotes less than two pages to his argument, advances eonclusory assertions, and only makes one statutory or case citation—to an out-of-eireuit ease—while his list of authorities denotes five cases that are not cited in his brief. Because Lianju Yang’s brief has not meaningfully challenged the BIA’s reasoning as to whether he demonstrated that his actual or imputed political opinion was a central reason driving the harm he suffered from Chinese officials, he is deemed to have waived the claim. *United States v. Scroggins,*599 F.3d 433, 446-47 (5th Cir. 2010); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A). Therefore, the petition for review is DENIED.

This is not the first time we have rejected claims brought by counsel for failure to adequately brief. *See Poscual-Jimenez v. Sessions,*678 Fed.Appx. 191, 192 (5th Cir. *3702017). Sanctions may be warranted where we are “left with the inescapable impression that [the appellant’s] arguments on appeal were so totally without merit and his briefing so sloppily prepared.” *Macklin v. City of New Orleans,*293 F.3d 237, 241 (5th Cir. 2002). We have imposed sanctions under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927 for the filing of a “ ‘slap-dash’ excuse for a brief’ after noting that “poor quality of briefing is inexcusable.” *Carmon v. Lubrizol Corp.,*17 F.3d 791, 795 (5th Cir. 1994). Counsel is therefore WARNED that we will impose sanctions for future frivolous filings. *See Cilauro v. Thielsch Eng’g,*123 Fed.Appx. 588, 591 (5th Cir. 2005) (issuing á warning to counsel for filing a frivolous brief).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In the Matter of Charles Reschke, Deceased. Anne Dieterich et al., Appellants; Joseph Peck, Respondent.

Argued May 19, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*916
      *Thomas F. Hyland*and *William H. Daly*for appellants.

*Edward R. Dobson*and *Anthony A. Cocheo*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to all parties filing separate briefs payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
#### Martin Juman et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Louise Wise Services, Respondent-Appellant. Martin Juman, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael Juman, Deceased, Appellant, v Louise Wise Services et al., Respondents.

[770 NYS2d 305]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered September 8, 2000, which, in the first of the above-captioned actions, to the extent appealed and cross-appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to preclude plaintiffs in this action for “wrongful adoption” from offering evidence of lost earnings allegedly attributable to heart attacks induced by emotional stress stemming from the alleged wrongful adoption, and denied, in part, defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for punitive damages in its entirety, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered July 24, 2002, which, in the second of the above-captioned actions, granted defendants’ motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee finding that plaintiffs decedent Michael Juman was not entitled to toll the running of the applicable statutory period pursuant to CPLR 208, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In these actions arising out of the alleged wrongful adoption of Michael Juman by plaintiffs Martin and Phyllis Juman, we have already had occasion to note that any compensatory damages recovered by plaintiffs should be limited to damages for pecuniary loss directly attributable to the alleged fraud (254 *310AD2d 72, 74 [1998]). Damages for emotional distress or for its somatic sequelae, such as the heart condition that is alleged to have caused plaintiff Martin Juman’s premature retirement, do not fall within this description *(id.; and see Jeffrey BB. v Cardinal McCloskey School & Home for Children,*257 AD2d 21, 24 [1999]) and were properly disallowed by the motion court. However, the motion court erred in concluding that plaintiffs were entitled to seek punitive damages for defendant’s alleged disregard of its disclosure obligations under Social Services Law § 373-a subsequent to September19, 1983, the effective date of the enactment setting a statutory standard for disclosure. Defendant’s conduct subsequent to September 1983 is irrelevant to plaintiffs’ wrongful adoption claim, since the operative facts are those that occurred at and around the time of the 1966 adoption.

Finally, inasmuch as the findings of the Referee, to the effect that plaintiff’s decedent Michael Juman was not unable to protect his legal rights by reason of “an over-all inability to function in society” *(see McCarthy v Volkswagen of Am.,*55 NY2d 543, 548 [1982]), are well supported in the record, the Referee’s conclusion that Michael Juman was not entitled to a toll of the statutory period pursuant to CPLR 208 was properly confirmed *(see Burgos v City of New York,*294 AD2d 177 [2002]).

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17286 and #17287; Kentucky Disaster Number KY-
00087]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4630-DR), dated 
12/12/2021.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Flooding, and 
Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 12/10/2021 through 12/11/2021.

DATES: Issued on 02/14/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/14/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/12/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 12/12/2021, is 
hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to 03/14/2022.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Barbara Carson,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-03550 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P