Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices 10787 

The detailed unit-by-unit data and 

preliminary allowance allocation 

calculations for ‘‘new’’ units are set 

forth in Excel spreadsheets titled 

‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2021_NOX_Annual_

Prelim_Data_New_Units’’, ‘‘CSAPR_

NUSA_2021_NOX_OS_Prelim_Data_

New_Units’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_

2021_SO2_Prelim_Data_New_Units’’, 

available on EPA’s website at https://

www.epa.gov/csapr/csapr-allowanceallocations#nusa. Each of the 

spreadsheets contains a separate 

worksheet for each state covered by that 

program showing, for each unit 

identified as eligible for a NUSA 

allocation, (1) the unit’s emissions in 

the 2021 control period (annual or 

ozone season as applicable), (2) the 

maximum 2021 NUSA allowance 

allocation for which the unit is eligible 

(typically the unit’s emissions in the 

2021 control period), (3) various 

adjustments to the unit’s maximum 

allocation if the NUSA pool is 

oversubscribed, and (4) the preliminary 

calculation of the unit’s 2021 NUSA 

allowance allocation. 

Each state worksheet for ‘‘new’’ units 

also contains a summary showing (1) 

the quantity of allowances initially 

available in that state’s 2021 NUSA, (2) 

the sum of the 2021 NUSA allowance 

allocations that will be made to new 

units in that state, assuming there are no 

corrections to the data, and (3) the 

quantity of allowances that would 

remain in the 2021 NUSA for allocation 

to existing units, again assuming there 

are no corrections to the data. 

The preliminary calculations of 

allocations of the remaining unallocated 

allowances to ‘‘existing’’ units are set 

forth in Excel spreadsheets titled 

‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2021_NOX_Annual_

Prelim_Data_Existing_Units’’, ‘‘CSAPR_

NUSA_2021_NOX_OS_Prelim_Data_

Existing_Units’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_

2021_SO2_Prelim_Data_Existing_

Units’’, available at the same location. 

Objections should be strictly limited 

to the data and calculations upon which 

the NUSA allowance allocations are 

based and should be emailed to the 

address identified in ADDRESSES. 

Objections must include: (1) Precise 

identification of the specific data and/or 

calculations the commenter believes are 

inaccurate, (2) new proposed data and/ 

or calculations upon which the 

commenter believes EPA should rely 

instead to determine allowance 

allocations, and (3) the reasons why 

EPA should rely on the commenter’s 

proposed data and/or calculations and 

not the data referenced in this notice. 

EPA notes that an allocation or lack 

of allocation of allowances to a given 

unit does not constitute a determination 

that CSAPR does or does not apply to 

the unit. EPA also notes that, under 40 

CFR 97.411(c), 97.511(c), 97.611(c), 

97.711(c), 97.811(c), and 97.1011(c), 

allocations are subject to potential 

correction if a unit to which allowances 

have been allocated for a given control 

period is not actually an affected unit as 

of the start of that control period. 

(Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 

97.611(b), 97.711(b), 97.811(b), and 

97.1011(b).) 

Rona Birnbaum, 

Acting Director, Clean Air Markets Division, 

Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of 

Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2022–04031 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9337–01–OW] 

Notice of Availability of the Deepwater 

Horizon Oil Spill Texas Trustee 

Implementation Group Draft 

Restoration Plan/Environmental 

Assessment #2: Restoration of 

Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore 

Habitats; Nutrient Reduction; Oysters; 

Sea Turtles; and Birds 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for public comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), the federal and state natural 

resource trustee agencies for the Texas 

Trustee Implementation Group (Texas 

TIG) prepared the Draft Restoration 

Plan/Environmental Assessment #2: 

Restoration of Wetlands, Coastal, and 

Nearshore Habitats; Nutrient Reduction; 

Oysters; Sea Turtles; and Birds (Draft 

RP/EA #2). The Draft RP/EA #2 

describes and proposes restoration 

project alternatives considered by the 

Texas TIG to restore natural resources 

and ecological services injured or lost as 

a result of the Deepwater Horizon oil 

spill. The Texas TIG evaluated these 

alternatives under criteria set forth in 

the OPA natural resource damage 

assessment (NRDA) regulations and 

evaluated the environmental 

consequences of the restoration 

alternatives in accordance with the 

NEPA. The proposed projects are 

consistent with the restoration 

alternatives selected in the Deepwater 

Horizon Oil Spill: Final Programmatic 

Damage Assessment and Restoration 

Plan and Final Programmatic 

Environmental Impact Statement 

(PDARP/PEIS). This notice informs the 

public of the availability of the Draft RP/ 

EA #2 and provides an opportunity for 

the public to submit comments on the 

document. 

DATES: The Texas TIG will consider 

public comments received on or before 

March 28, 2022. 

Public Webinar: The Texas TIG will 

conduct a public webinar on March 9, 

2022, at 6 p.m. Central Standard Time 

to facilitate public review and comment 

on the Draft RP/EA #2. The public 

webinar will include a presentation on 

the Draft RP/EA #2. Public comments 

will be taken during the public webinar. 

The public may register for the webinar 

at https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/ 

register/2667653123715836432. After 

registering, participants will receive a 

confirmation email with instructions for 

joining the webinar. The presentation 

will be posted on the web after the 

webinar is conducted. 

ADDRESSES:

Obtaining Documents: You may 

download the Draft RP/EA #2 at https:// 

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ 

restoration-areas/texas. Alternatively, 

you may request a compact disc (CD) of 

the Draft RP/EA #2 (see FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT). You may also 

view the document at any of the public 

facilities listed at https://

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ 

restoration-areas/texas. 

Submitting Comments: You may 

submit comments on the Draft RP/EA #2 

by one of the following methods: 

• Via the Web: https://

parkplanning.nps.gov/TXRP2. 

• Via U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 29649, 

Atlanta, GA 30345. 

• During the Public Webinar: 

Comments may be provided by the 

public during the webinar on March 9, 

2022. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or withdrawn. The Texas TIG 

may publish any comment received 

regarding the document. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. The Texas TIG will 

generally not consider comments or 

comment contents located outside of the 

written submission (i.e., on the web, 

cloud, or other file sharing system). 

Please be aware that your entire 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
10788 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices 

comment, including your personal 

identifying information, will become 

part of the public record. Please note 

that mailed comments must be 

postmarked on or before the comment 

deadline of March 28, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

• Texas—Angela Schrift; 

Angela.Schrift@tpwd.texas.gov; 512– 

389–8755. 

• EPA—Douglas Jacobson; 

Jacobson.Doug@epa.gov; 214–665–6692. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction 

On April 20, 2010, the mobile 

offshore drilling unit Deepwater 

Horizon, which was being used to drill 

a well for BP Exploration and 

Production, Inc. (BP), in the Macondo 

prospect (Mississippi Canyon 252– 

MC252), experienced a significant 

explosion, fire, and subsequent sinking 

in the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in the 

release of an unprecedented volume of 

oil and other discharges from the rig and 

from the wellhead on the seabed. The 

Deepwater Horizon oil spill is the 

largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history, 

discharging millions of barrels of oil 

over a period of 87 days. The Trustees 

conducted the natural resource damage 

assessment for the Deepwater Horizon 

oil spill under the OPA. Under the OPA, 

federal and state agencies act as trustees 

on behalf of the public to assess natural 

resource injuries and losses and to 

determine the actions required to 

compensate the public for those injuries 

and losses. The OPA further instructs 

the designated trustees to develop and 

implement a plan for the restoration, 

rehabilitation, replacement, or 

acquisition of the equivalent of the 

injured natural resources under their 

trusteeship, including the loss of use 

and services from those resources from 

the time of injury until the time 

restoration to baseline (the resource 

quality and conditions that would exist 

if the spill had not occurred) is 

complete. 

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill 

Trustees are: 

• U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA); 

• U.S. Department of the Interior 

(DOI), as represented by the National 

Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, and Bureau of Land 

Management; 

• National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), on behalf of 

the U.S. Department of Commerce; 

• U.S. Department of Agriculture 

(USDA); 

• State of Louisiana Coastal 

Protection and Restoration Authority, 

Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office, 

Department of Environmental Quality, 

Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 

and Department of Natural Resources; 

• State of Mississippi Department of 

Environmental Quality; 

• State of Alabama Department of 

Conservation and Natural Resources and 

Geological Survey of Alabama; 

• State of Florida Department of 

Environmental Protection and Fish and 

Wildlife Conservation Commission; and 

• State of Texas Parks and Wildlife 

Department (TPWD), General Land 

Office (TGLO), and Commission on 

Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 

On April 4, 2016, the Trustees 

reached and finalized a settlement of 

their natural resource damage claims 

with BP in a Consent Decree approved 

by the United States District Court for 

the Eastern District of Louisiana. 

Pursuant to that Consent Decree, 

restoration projects in the Texas 

Restoration Area are chosen and 

managed by the Texas TIG. The Texas 

TIG is composed of the following 

Trustees: TPWD, TGLO, TCEQ, EPA, 

DOI, NOAA, USDA. 

Background 

In an October 2020 notice posted at 

https://www.gulfspillrestoration.

noaa.gov/2020/10/submit-your-ideastexas-restoration-area-planning, the 

Texas TIG requested public input on 

restoration project ideas in the Texas 

Restoration Area within the following 

restoration types: Wetlands, Coastal, 

and Nearshore Habitats, Nutrient 

Reduction, Oysters, Sea Turtles, and 

Birds. The Texas TIG reviewed and 

considered these restoration project 

ideas in developing the Draft RP/EA #2. 

Overview of the Draft RP/EA 

The Draft RP/EA #2 is being released 

in accordance with the OPA, NRDA 

implementing regulations, and the 

NEPA. In the Draft RP/EA #2, the Texas 

TIG presents to the public the Texas 

TIG’s most recent plan to restore natural 

resources and ecological services 

injured or lost as a result of the 

Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The Draft 

RP/EA #2 evaluates a total of eighteen 

restoration project alternatives within 

the Texas Restoration Area. Of those, 

thirteen are identified as preferred 

alternatives. The Draft RP/EA #2 also 

evaluates a no-action alternative. The 

Draft RP/EA #2 proposes the following 

preferred project alternatives for each 

restoration type: 

Wetlands, Coastal, and Nearshore 

Habitats 

• Bird Island Cove Habitat 

Restoration—Construction; 

• Bahia Grande Channel F Hydrologic 

Restoration; 

• Follets Island Habitat Acquisition 

Phase 2; and 

• Galveston Island Habitat 

Acquisition. 

Nutrient Reduction 

• Petronila Creek Constructed 

Wetlands Planning; and 

• Petronila Creek Watershed Nutrient 

Reduction Initiative. 

Oysters 

• Landscape Scale Oyster Restoration 

in Galveston Bay. 

Sea Turtles 

• Upper Texas Coast Sea Turtle 

Rehabilitation Facility; and 

• Lancha Sea Turtle Mitigation Plan. 

Birds 

• Laguna Vista Rookery Island 

Habitat Protection; 

• Jones Bay Oystercatcher Habitat 

Restoration; 

• San Antonio Bay Bird Island; and 

• Texas Breeding Shorebird and 

Seabird Stewardship. 

The total estimated cost of the 

preferred alternatives is approximately 

$39 million. One or more alternatives 

may be selected for implementation by 

the Texas TIG. Additional restoration 

planning for the Texas Restoration Area 

will continue. 

Next Steps 

The public is encouraged to review 

and comment on the Draft RP/EA #2. A 

public webinar is scheduled to help 

facilitate the public review and 

comment process. After the public 

comment period ends, the Texas TIG 

will consider the comments received 

before finalizing the Final RP/EA #2. A 

summary of comments received and the 

Texas TIG’s responses and any revisions 

to the document, as appropriate, will be 

included in the final document. 

Administrative Record 

The documents comprising the 

Administrative Record for the Draft RP/ 

EA #2 can be viewed electronically at 

https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/ 

adminrecord. 

Authority 

The authority for this action is the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et 

seq.), its implementing NRDA 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 38 / Friday, February 25, 2022 / Notices 10789 

regulations found at 15 CFR part 990, 

and the NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

Benita Best-Wong, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Water. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03885 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice: 2022–6005] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Final Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (EXIM), as a part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

Agencies to comment on the proposed 

information collection, as required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

This collection of information is 

necessary to determine whether or not 

a company has a good payment history. 

This form will enable EXIM to make a 

credit decision on a foreign buyer credit 

limit request submitted by a new or 

existing policy holder. Additionally, 

this form is used by those EXIM policy 

holders granted delegated authority to 

commit the Bank to a foreign buyer 

credit limit. 

DATES: Comments should be received on 

or before April 26, 2022 to be assured 

of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

www.regulations.gov (EIB 99–14) or by 

email to Mia.Johnson@exim.gov, or by 

mail to Mia L. Johnson, Export-Import 

Bank of the United States, 811 Vermont 

Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20571. The 

form can be viewed at http://

www.exim.gov/sites/default/files/pub/ 

pending/eib99-14.pdf. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Titles and Form Number: EIB 99–14 

Export-Import Bank Trade Reference 

form. 

OMB Number: 3048–0042. 

Type of Review: Renew. 

Need and Use: This form provides 

essential credit information used by 

EXIM credit officers when analyzing 

requests for export credit insurance/ 

financing support, both short-term (360 

days and less) and medium-term (longer 

than 360 days), for the export of their 

U.S. goods and services. Additionally, 

this form is an integral part of the short 

term Multi-Buyer export credit 

insurance policy for those policy 

holders granted foreign buyer 

discretionary credit limit authority 

(DCL). Multi-Buyer policy holders given 

DCL authority may use this form as the 

sole source or one piece among several 

sources of credit information for their 

internal foreign buyer credit decision 

which, in turn, commits EXIM’s 

insurance. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S. 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 

6,500. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 1,625 hours. 

Frequency of Reporting or Use: As 

needed. 

Government Expenses: 

Reviewing Time per Year: 1,625 

hours. 

Average Wages per Hour: $42.50. 

Average Cost per Year: $69,062 (time 

* wages). 

Benefits and Overhead: 20%. 

Total Government Cost: $82,875. 

Bassam Doughman, 

IT Specialist. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03976 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice: 2022–6006] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of 

the United States (EXIM), as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

Agencies to comment on the proposed 

information collection, as required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Financial institutions interested in 

becoming an Approved Finance 

Provider (AFP) with EXIM must 

complete this application in order to 

obtain approval to make loans under 

EXIM insurance policies and/or enter 

into one or more Master Guarantee 

Agreements (MGA) with EXIM. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 26, 2022 to be assured 

of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

www.regulations.gov (EIB 10–06) or by 

email to Mia.Johnson@exim.gov, or by 

mail to Mia L. Johnson, Export-Import 

Bank, 811 Vermont Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20571. 

The information collection tool can be 

reviewed at: http://exim.gov/sites/ 

default/files/pub/pending/eib10_06.pdf. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An AFP 

may participate in the Medium-Term 

Insurance, Bank Letter of Credit, and 

Financial Institution Buyer Credit 

programs as an insured lender, while 

AFPs approved for an MGA may apply 

for multiple loan or lease transactions to 

be guaranteed by EXIM. 

EXIM uses the information provided 

in the form and the supplemental 

information required to be submitted 

with the form to determine whether the 

lender qualifies to participate in its 

lender insurance and guarantee 

programs. The details are necessary to 

evaluate whether the lender has the 

capital to fund potential transactions, 

proper due diligence procedures, and 

the monitoring capacity to carry out 

transactions. 

Title and Form Number: EIB 10–06 

Application for Approved Finance 

Provider. 

OMB Number: 3048–0032. 

Type of Review: Renew. 

Need and Use: The information 

collected will allow EXIM to determine 

compliance and content for transaction 

requests submitted to the Export-Import 

Bank under its insurance, guarantee, 

and direct loan programs. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S. 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 50. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 30 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours. 

Frequency of Reporting of Use: On 

occasion. 

Government Expenses: 

Reviewing Time per Year: 25 hours. 

Average Wages per Hour: $42.50. 

Average Cost per Year: $1,062.50 

(time * wages). 

Benefits and Overhead: 20%. 

Total Government Cost: $1,275. 

Bassam Doughman, 

IT Specialist. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03978 Filed 2–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice 2021–3004] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1