alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6504 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6504

To prohibit actions to carry out the Department of Commerce's pause in 
   the issuance of new export licenses for certain exports under the 
                         Commerce Control List.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2023

Mr. Green of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Posey, Mr. Graves 
  of Missouri, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Harris, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Alford, and Mr. 
 Dunn of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit actions to carry out the Department of Commerce's pause in 
   the issuance of new export licenses for certain exports under the 
                         Commerce Control List.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect American Gun Exporters 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACTIONS TO CARRY OUT THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              COMMERCE'S PAUSE IN THE ISSUANCE OF NEW EXPORT LICENSES 
              FOR CERTAIN EXPORTS UNDER THE COMMERCE CONTROL LIST.

    (a) In General.--Effective beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce--
            (1) may not take any action to carry out the Department of 
        Commerce's assessment or any policy changes resulting from the 
        assessment announced on October 27, 2023, relating to the 
        Department's pause in the issuance of new export licenses for 
        exports of all items controlled under Export Control 
        Classification Numbers 0A501, 0A502, 0A504, and 0A505 of the 
        Commerce Control List; and
            (2) may not take any substantially similar action to pause 
        or otherwise suspend or prohibit the issuance of new export 
        licenses for exports of any or all items described in paragraph 
        (1).
    (b) Exception.--The Secretary of Commerce may take an action 
described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) only if--
            (1) the action is subject to and meets the requirements 
        of--
                    (A) section 553 of title 5, United States Code; and
                    (B) chapter 8 of title 5, commonly known as the 
                ``Congressional Review Act''); and
            (2) before taking the action, the Secretary conducts a 
        regulatory impact analysis of the action.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.1


                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                              --------------------



     This Amendment No. 2 (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the
1st day of January, 1997 by and between First Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.,
an Illinois corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") and Michael
P. Harrington (hereinafter referred to as "Employee").

     WHEREAS, the parties previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated
as of December 31, 1994, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
dated as of December 31, 1994 (the "Agreement");

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement as hereinafter set
forth.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein,
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1. Paragraph 4(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as follows:

      "an annual incentive compensation award in an amount equal to one

      percent (1%) of the consolidated pretax net income of the Company

      ("Annual Incentive Compensation Award").  The Annual Incentive

      Compensation Award shall be: (i) computed without regard to

      Employee's annual incentive compensation payable hereunder and

      without regard to any annual incentive compensation payable to

      each other employee of the Company who receives a percentage of

      the consolidated pretax net income of the Company pursuant to an

      individual employment contract, (ii) determined by the firm of

      independent accountants then in the employ of the 

<PAGE>   2

      Company; and (iii) paid within thirty (30) days after the determination 

      of such Annual Incentive Compensation Award;"

     2. The Agreement as amended hereby is ratified, approved and confirmed in
all respects.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 2
the day and year first above written.

                                           FIRST ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL GROUP,
                                           INC., an Illinois corporation


                                           By:
                                              -------------------------------
                                           Its:
                                               ------------------------------



                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Michael P. Harrington
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Alberto GUZMAN-SANCHEZ, also known as Juan Alberto Guzman, also known as Juan Alberto Guzman Sanchez, also known as Juan Guzman, also known as Juan Guzman Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-20636 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 1, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Alberto Guzman-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Guzman-Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for' appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0453

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRIAN ROBERT BENEDICT,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 5, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 27 2023

03/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0453
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dan Amadori, Chief Financial Officer of Micromem Technologies Inc.,certify that:

| 1.     | I have reviewed this annual    report on Form 20-F/A of Micromem Technologies Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this  report    does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with    respect to the period covered by this  report.      Date: June 22, 2005. /s/ Dan Amadori                              Dan Amadori    Chief Financial Officer |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50333 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GILDARDO CRUZ

- RAMIREZ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:18

- CR

- 2218

- 1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Gildardo Cruz

- Ramirez appeals the 30

- month above

- guidelines sentence and three

- year term of supervised release following his guilty plea conviction for being found unlawfully in the United States after previous deportation. He

a rgues that his sentence is unconstitutional because it exceeds the maximum sentence of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) charged in the indictment. However, he correctly

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 3, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50333 Document: 00515221486 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/03/2019No. 19

- 50333

2 concedes that the issue whether his eligibility for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

- Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 20 07). Thus, summary affirmance is appropriate. Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-50333 Document: 00515221486 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/03/2019
#### Silas Clark *versus*Anson Rockwell and Others.

Debt on a bond to review does not lie originally to this Court.

If brought here, the defendant cannot have judgment for his costs.

Debt on bond conditions to prosecute a writ of review. The action was originally brought to this Court; and on motion of the counsel for the defendants, the Court dismissed it, as having no original jurisdiction of the suit.

*Hubbard,*for the defendants,

moved for costs; but the Court overruled the motion, on the ground taken in the case of *Williams*vs. *Blunt.*(1) *(a)*

Regola Generalis.

On the admission of Counsellors and Attorneys.

*Ordered,*that, hereafter, any gentleman who is duly qualified for admission as an attorney or counsellor of this Court may be admitted, in any county within the commonwealth where the Court shah be holden by three or more justices thereof, on producing a certificate of recommendation, according to the rules heretofore established, of his qualifications and good moral character, from the bar of the county in which he may have practised; provided, that no term of the Supreme Judicial Court, at which by law he could be admitted, shall be to be held, in or for the county in which he is a practitioner, for three months after he shall be entitled, by the rules aforesaid, to be admitted.

(1) (a)

2 *Mass. Rep.*207. —See also 12 *Mass. Rep.*370, Thomas, Judge, *&c.,*vs. White. (a) Vide *Guild*vs. Richardson, 6 *Pick.*364. — *Dean*vs. Dean, 2 *Pick.*25. *Montalot*vs. Murray, 4 Crunch, 46. — *Inglee*vs. Coolidge, 2 *Wheat.*358. — *M’luer & Al.*vs. Walter, 9 *Wheat.*650. — *Winchester*vs. *Jackson & Al.*3 Crunch, 515
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the periodic report of Connetics Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Higgins, Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

Date: May 10, 2004

/s/ John L. Higgins
-------------------------------------------------
John L. Higgins
Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development
Chief Financial Officer
Sl()-I()()3()3-()19 

200 CWA Drive, Suite 201 

Mosinee, Wisconsin 54455 

,_.--.., Plione 715-693-2147 

Fax 715-693-4614 

www. fly-cwa. org 

CENTRAL WISCONSIN AIRPORT 

flycwA 

February 24,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Doclcet DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Pea r Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust immunity and 

proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlineis and Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance 

between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld alliance to compete effectively with the Star and 

SkyTeam alliances. This increased alliance conhpetition willin turn enhance the benefits of the 

Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S. -Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a 

foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of tranlsp^^ to approve this application as it 

would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work cibsely together to deliver highly competitive air 

{transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering 

customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue 

to benefit from the competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

i urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely Sincer , ( 

Tony Vaim uM. 

Airport/ftanifnistrator 

tvaren(a(fl)/-cwa.org 

Cc: file 

Serving Wausau, Stevens Point and the Central Wisconsin Region
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence ROMO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50124

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 11, 2017 *

Filed April 19, 2017

Jean-Claude Andre, Joanna Moriah Curtis, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, DOJ — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Gia Kim, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Angeles), Los Ange-les, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lawrence Romo appeals from the district court’s judgment imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand with instructions to correct the judgment.

Romo contends that this case should be remanded for the district court to correct three errors in the written judgment. The government agrees, as do we. First, the record reflects that Romo was convicted of possession, not distribution, of child pornography. Accordingly, the court shall strike the judgment’s description of Romo’s offense and replace it with: possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), (b)(2).

Second, the district court shall conform the language of condition number 10 of supervised release in the written judgment to the language of condition number 11 in the December 11, 2014 “Notice of Conditions of Supervised Release” that the parties agree was incorporated by reference into the court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. *See United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir. 1993) (remanding to conform the written judgment to the oral' sentence because the oral pronouncement controls).

Finally, the district court shall uncheck the box requiring Romo to comply with General Order 01-05. The court did not impose this condition at sentencing and it is inapplicable here because Romo was not ordered to pay a fine or restitution. *See*C.D. Cal. General Order 01-05.

VACATED and REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the annual report of Prime Air, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report").  I, Blaine Haug,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     the  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June  21,  2004              /s/  Blaine  Haug
                                     -----------------
                                     Blaine  Haug
                                     Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer
                                     (Principal  Executive  Officer  and
                                     Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


                                       16
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.23
   
  th
 
    
    Compensation: Our employment offer for this position includes;
 a.
    
    Annual Base Salary of $425,000.00 (payable in 26 biweekly payments).b.
    
    Christmas Bonus equivalent to one month salary (less amounts withheld as
established by law), as ratified by the Board of Directors each year. For year 2008
it will be prorated by the amount of months worked.
 
    
    Hiring Bonus: You will receive a hiring bonus in the amount of $100,000.00. The hiring
bonus will be considered as accrued upon payment.
    
    Additional Bonus: According to your position, you will be eligible to obtain a bonus in
the amount of $100,000.00 by year end.
    
    Automobile: The Bank will assign you a Category III Automobile, which value will not
exceed $75,000.00. As established under the Corporate Automobile Policy of the Institution,
the Bank will cover all expenses related to the vehicles maintenance and repairs, will pay
the annual vehicle license renewal, including the inspection of the same and will provide car
insurance coverage, which will cover in case of an accident. Normal expenses as gas, oil and
other, will be covered by the vehicle user.
    
    Parking: The Bank will assign you a parking space in the Westernbank World Plaza building.
The cost of such parking space, which amounts to the monthly fee of $80.00, will be covered
by the Bank in full.
    
    Health Insurance Plan: You will be immediately eligible to benefit of a Health Insurance
plan with coverage for you and your family, under the regulations and rates established by the
Institution.




---



##### 




    
    Insurance: You will be eligible for a basic group life insurance in the amount of 4.0
times your annual salary or $500,000.00, whichever is less. The cost of said insurance will
be covered by the Bank in full. You will also have the option of extending the life insurance
coverage up to $750,000.00 (combined). The additional cost will be covered at your expense.
Also, the Bank will cover the cost of long and short term disability insurance.
    
    Savings Plan 1165(e) and Profit Sharing Plan: You will be eligible to join and invest in
the Savings Plan after your first year of working with the Institution. The plan includes
employees contribution, employers contribution or match and the portion of shared gains or
Profit Sharing.
    
    Vacation Benefit: You will be eligible to enjoy 21 vacation days per year.
     /s/ Carlos DávilaMr. Carlos Dávila TorresEVP & Chief Retail Banking Officer/s/ Lidio SorianoAcceptedMr. Lidio Soriano