alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6273
LESTER HARDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOYD BENNETT; DENNIS ROWLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-ct-03107-FL) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lester Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lester Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardy v. Bennett , No. 5:06-ct-03107-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
CAUSE NO. 03-17-00708-CV 

# i^receivedN DEC 0 5 2017

RON VALENTINE,SR. 

### Appellant Vs. IN THE THIRD DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS
JEREMY JAGODZINSKI and CHRISTI GREENE TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

MOTION TO VACATE DECISION OF THE COURT TO THE COURT: 

## Appellantmotionsto vacate the opinion ofthe courtregarding indigence made on 11/15/2017. According to Rule 20.1 (j)(4)T.R.A.P,the Court wasuntimely in its decision.The Courtdecided in excess ofthe 10day requirement.By operation oflaw,the 

### appellant's motion mustbe granted.

Thank You, Ron ValentineCertificate ofConference



### Valentine has attempted to confer with the party ofinterest but there was no reply. Ron Valentine

Certificate ofService 

### Valentine delivers this documentvia hand delivery to Earl Vickery at 3007 Dancy St Austin,TX 78722on November 30,2017,2017 Ron Valentine

# fecfeOffice.

Address: Location: Device ID: 6406 N I H 35

AUSTIN TX 78752 MHRKR Transaction: 900182506100 •FedEx Ground .9 23 

### 788705747613 0.1 1bs. (S) Declared Value 0 

### MailrYstrdayNews6xlO gg 040036567863 ^ 

### Shipment subtotal: $9-23 Herctandtse 

### Tax(City): 2X $0.02

Total Due: $10.30 

### (R) CreditCard: $10.30
duplicate
M s yeiaht entered aanuBlly S = Uewht read free scale I : laxable Iten leras and Conditions appiy. See fedex.coa/us/seroice-9uide for details. Visit US at: fed^^ Or call 1.800.GoFedEx 1.800.463.3339 

### Rov 30, 2017 6:42:26 PM

«E LISTEN Tell us how we're doing s receive a disMunt on vour fprtex.com/welist^ or 800-398 024^ ' Redemption Code: »»» Thartk you ***-'r.-ryiV-./,;--



# i FROM: (512) 323-5045 Ronald Valentine 5508 AVENUE F AUSTIN TX 70751 

### TM THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

### THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 209 W 14TH ST \ 

### AUSTIN TX 78701 (512) 463-1733 REfs IHU: PO: DEPT; SHIP DATE: QlD ACTUGT: 0.10 LB CAD: 6991761/SSF01822 2 DinnEO: 9 X 8 X 6 IN 2



## 7887 0574 7613 (USr FedEx Ground ■a. 1 V m-. 

## rt 

# p 78701 9622 0019 0 (000 000 0000) 0 00 7887 0574 7613
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the periodic report of Connetics Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Higgins, Chief Financial
Officer, Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development of the
Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

Date: December 2, 2003

/s/ John L. Higgins
-----------------------------------------------------------
John L. Higgins
Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB

OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 2005



The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle
Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2005.



I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



This certification is executed as of July 27, 2005.



/s/ Michael R. SayreChief Financial Officer




30
#### Wayne Douglas MERKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of IDAHO; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35527

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 20, 2017

*641Wayne Douglas Merkley, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *641*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Idaho state prisoner Wayne Douglas Merkley appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional and statutory claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Belanus v. Clark,*796 F.3d 1021, 1024 (9th Cir. 2015) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); *Watison v. Carter,*668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Merkley’s action because Merkley failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. *See Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are to be construed liberally, a plaintiff must present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Merkley’s motion for reconsideration because Merkley did not demonstrate grounds for reconsideration. *See Kona Enters., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop,*229 F.3d 877, 883, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting forth standard of review and grounds for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59).

The district court did not err in denying Merkley’s motion to rescind his consent to proceed before a magistrate judge because Merkley did not demonstrate good cause or extraordinary circumstances. *See Anderson v. Woodcreek Venture Ltd.,*351 F.3d 911, 915 (9th Cir. 2003) (standard of review); *Dixon v. Ylst,*990 F.2d 478, 479-80 (9th Cir. 1993) (consent to proceed before a magistrate judge in a civil case may only be withdrawn for good cause or extraordinary circumstances).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Amendment to Employment Contract of Craig D Gates



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, KEY TRONIC CORPORATION (the “Employer”) and Craig D. Gates (the “Employee”) desire to amend
Employee’s October 27, 1994 Employment Contract, as amended (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, said
amendment is based upon the mutual desires of the Employer and the Employee; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants contained therein, the following amendment to the Agreement is executed. Except as provided in this amendment, the other terms and conditions set out in the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 

 

	1.	The following sentence is added at the end of Section 9 b) of the Agreement: 

 “The foregoing notwithstanding, in the event Employer changes the substantive responsibilities and duties of Employee in such a way as to constitute a demotion, Employee shall have the option of
terminating Employee’s employment without loss of severance benefits, the same as if Employer had terminated the employment.” 
  

									
	EMPLOYER: Key Tronic Corporation	 		 	EMPLOYEE:
					
	By:	 	/s/Ronald F. Klawitter	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Craig D. Gates
	Name:	 	Ronald F. Klawitter	 		 	Name:	 	Craig D. Gates
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President of Administration, CFO & Treasurer	 		 		 	
	Date:	 	May 10, 2012	 		 	Date:	 	May 10, 2012
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0645 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-052-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
1

Faulk, Scott (OST)

Subject: EAS at Beckley

From: Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:22 AM 

To: 'Beckley Airport Manager'; 'Beckley' 

Cc: Kelly Carbone (KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com); Dave Hackett <dhackett@gosunair.com> 

(dhackett@gosunair.com); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Subject: EAS at Beckley 

Greetings All, 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Beckley, and give you an opportunity 

to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs. 

 

As you know, by Order 2014-7-11, issued on July 18, 2014, the Department re-solicited proposals from air 

carriers interested in providing EAS at Beckley for a new term. In response to our request, Charter Air 

Transport and Sun Air International submitted a proposals for consideration. I have attached each air carrier’s 

proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request 

that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than 

August 15th. Please send your comments directly to scott.faulk@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all 

relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Feel free to contact me if you have any 

questions. 

Kind Regards, 

Scott Faulk 

Transportation Industry Analyst 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202-366-9967
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 19, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the United States Court of Appeals

For the Fifth Circuit

_________________________

No. 03-50924

Summary Calendar

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

SANDRA TEJADA; LORENA PAZ AGUILAR,

Defendants - Appellants.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-02-CR-1988-1-DB

_________________________

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sandra Tejada and Lorena Paz Aguilar challenge the

sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions for

conspiracy and for possession with intent to distribute a

controlled substance. They contend that the evidence is

insufficient to show that they were aware that approximately 4.9

kilograms of cocaine were hidden beneath the dashboard of a

borrowed vehicle that they presented at the Desert Haven, Texas,
1See United States v. Runyon, 290 F.3d 223, 238 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 537 U.S. 888 (2002); United States v. Ramos-Garcia,

184 F.3d 463, 465-67 (5th Cir. 1999).

2See United States v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1492 (5th Cir.

1995); United States v. L’Hoste, 640 F.2d 693, 696 (5th Cir. 1981).

2

Border Patrol checkpoint.

In light of the value of the cocaine, the fact that Tejada

and Aguilar lied to law enforcement officials about the extent of

their contact with the borrowed vehicle, their nervousness, and

their implausible vacation plans, a rational jury could have

found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants knew that

there was cocaine hidden inside their vehicle.1

Tejada and Aguilar also argue that the district court erred

by refusing to admit exculpatory hearsay testimony. We find no

clear error in the district court’s determination that the

trustworthiness of the out-of-court statement was not adequately

corroborated and no abuse of discretion in the court’s decision

to exclude the testimony.2

AFFIRMED.
_116. h.. ELM S°LOTIONS Or* amingemiammilivmmimm 520 W.Lake Mary Blvd,Suite 100,Sanford, FL 32773 Office:(407)732-7710 Fax:(610)728-7184 August 25, 2015

Department of Transportation Docket Management System West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington,DC 20590-001 Re: Amendment to Exemption No. 11779 Docket FAA-2015-0911 Dear Sir or Madam: We petition to add two (2) Inspire 1 UAVs, as well as the Century Neo 660 to the exemption issued to RKC Media Solutions, Inc. (Exemption No. 11779; Docket ID: FAA-2015-0911)(the "Exemption"). The associated (required) manuals for the three UAVs are enclosed. The other terms and conditions of the Exemption remain the same. There have not been (nor will there be) any changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original Exemption. Sincerely,
Randy C.Zachary, President RKC Media Solutions, LLC 520 W Lake Mary Blvd., Suite 100 Sanford, FL 32773 Enclosures

01290961 8/25/2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           8,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,164
<INVENTORY>                                     21,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,431
<PP&E>                                          32,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,785
<BONDS>                                          1,640
<COMMON>                                            19
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,400
<SALES>                                         37,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,698
<CGS>                                           23,944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,022)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (262)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Report of Travelstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Alverson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Katherine T. West
---------------------------
Katherine T. West
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2008
Dwight L. HILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 1D17-3691 1D17-3692 1D17-3693 1D17-3623 (Consolidated for disposition)

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, R. Kirk Morgan,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Actua Corporation; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ R. Kirk Morgan     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | R. Kirk Morgan         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,160,901
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,026,164
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 43,430,723
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    312,749,995
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,819,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             384,376,901
<DEPOSITS>                                 261,685,769
<SHORT-TERM>                                53,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,065,212
<LONG-TERM>                                 31,622,554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,111
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,963,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             384,376,901
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,919,983
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,292,378
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,212,361
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,077,768
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,172,341
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,040,020
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,300,490
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,545,200
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   4,545,200
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,983,337
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.58
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,060,953
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,776,539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   49,042
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,244
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,819,741
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,819,741
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>