9034 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2022 / Notices 

2The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2021). 3The Director, Office of Export Enforcement, is 

now the authorizing official for issuance of denial 

orders, pursuant to recent amendments to the 

Regulations (85 Fed. Reg. 73411, November 18, 

2020). 

1See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina, 

Mexico, and the Russian Federation: Initiation of 

Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 86 FR 60205 

(November 1, 2021). 

the ‘‘Regulations’’). 15 CFR 766.25.2 BIS 

has not received a written submission 

from Aguilar-Manriquez. 

Based upon my review of the record 

and consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Exporter Services, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny AguilarManriquez’s export privileges under the 

Regulations for a period of 10 years from 

the date of Aguilar-Manriquez’s 

conviction. The Office of Exporter 

Services has also decided to revoke any 

BIS-issued licenses in which AguilarManriquez had an interest at the time of 

his conviction.3

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

July 23, 2029, Ramon AguilarManriquez, with a last known address of 

1655 West Monroe Street, Apt. 21, 

Brownsville, Texas 78520 and when 

acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents 

or representatives (‘‘the Denied 

Person’’), may not directly or indirectly 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, license exception, or export 

control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or engaging 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or 

from any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of the Denied 

Person any item subject to the 

Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, pursuant to Section 1760(e) of 

the Export Control Reform Act (50 

U.S.C. 4819(e)) and Sections 766.23 and 

766.25 of the Regulations, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to AguilarManriquez by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Aguilar-Manriquez may 

file an appeal of this Order with the 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security. The appeal must 

be filed within 45 days from the date of 

this Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Aguilar-Manriquez and 

shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until July 23, 2029. 

John Sonderman, 

Director, Office of Export Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03416 Filed 2–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–357–824, A–201–856, A–821–833] 

Oil Country Tubular Goods From 

Argentina, Mexico, and the Russian 

Federation: Postponement of 

Preliminary Determinations in the 

Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable February 17, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482–0665 

(Argentina); James Hepburn at (202) 

482–1882 (Mexico); George McMahon at 

(202) 482–1167 (the Russian Federation 

(Russia)); AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 26, 2021, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) initiated lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of 

imports of oil country tubular goods 

(OCTG) from Argentina, Mexico, and 

Russia.1 Currently, the preliminary 

determinations are due no later than 

March 15, 2022. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determinations 

Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in an LTFV investigation 

within 140 days of the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation. 

However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act 

permits Commerce to postpone the 

preliminary determination until no later 

than 190 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation if: 

(A) The petitioner makes a timely 

request for a postponement; or (B) 

Commerce concludes that the parties 

concerned are cooperating, that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated, and that additional time is 

necessary to make a preliminary 

determination. Under 19 CFR 

351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a 

request for postponement 25 days or 

more before the scheduled date of the 

preliminary determination and must 

state the reasons for the request. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 33 / Thursday, February 17, 2022 / Notices 9035 

2See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular 

Goods from Argentina, Mexico, Russia, and the 

Republic of Korea: Petitioners’ Request to Extend 

Preliminary Determinations and Align the 

Countervailing Duty Investigations with the 

Concurrent Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations,’’ 

dated February 10, 2022. 

3 Id. 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019–2020, 87 FR 

935 (January 7, 2022) (Final Results), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memoranda, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping 

Administrative Review of Certain Aluminum Foil 

from the People’s Republic of China—Zhongji 

Analysis for the Final Results,’’ dated December 30, 

2021 (Zhongji Final Analysis Memorandum); and 

‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Surrogate Value Memorandum,’’ 

dated December 30, 2021 (Final Surrogate Value 

Memorandum). Commerce released both the 

Zhongji Final Analysis Memorandum and the Final 

Surrogate Value Memorandum to interested parties 

on January 7, 2022. 

3The petitioners are the Aluminum Association 

Trade Enforcement Working Group and its 

individual members. 

4See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘2nd Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Order on Certain 

Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

China—Petitioners’ Comments Identifying 

Ministerial Errors in Final Results,’’ dated January 

12, 2022; see also Zhongji’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

China: Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated January 

12, 2022. 

5See Zhongji’s Letter, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal 

Ministerial Error Comments,’’ dated January 19, 

2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Aluminum 

Foil from the People’s Republic of China: 

Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final Results,’’ 

dated concurrently with this notice (Ministerial 

Error Memorandum). 

Commerce will grant the request unless 

it finds compelling reasons to deny the 

request. 

On February 10, 2022, Borusan 

Mannesmann Pipe U.S., Inc., PTC 

Liberty Tubulars LLC, U.S. Steel 

Tubular Products, Inc., the United Steel, 

Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 

Manufacturing, Energy, Allied 

Industrial and Service Workers 

International Union, AFL–CIO, CLC, 

and Welded Tube USA, Inc. 

(collectively, the petitioners) submitted 

a timely request that Commerce 

postpone the preliminary 

determinations in these LTFV 

investigations.2 The petitioners stated 

that they request postponement due to 

the size and complexity of the 

investigations, the extensions of time 

already granted by Commerce to 

respondents, and the amount of time 

needed for Commerce to conduct 

complete and thorough analyses in 

these investigations, including the 

issuance and review of additional 

supplemental questionnaires.3

For the reasons stated above, and 

because there are no compelling reasons 

to deny the request, Commerce, in 

accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(e), is 

postponing the deadline for these 

preliminary determinations by 50 days 

(i.e., 190 days after the date on which 

these investigations were initiated). As 

a result, Commerce will issue its 

preliminary determinations no later 

than May 4, 2022. In accordance with 

section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final 

determinations in these investigations 

will continue to be 75 days after the 

date of the preliminary determinations, 

unless postponed at a later date. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: February 11, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03450 Filed 2–16–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–053] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is amending the final 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

aluminum foil from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) to correct 

ministerial errors. The period of review 

(POR) is April 1, 2019, through March 

31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 17, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scarlet Jaldin or Michael J. Heaney AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4275 or (202) 482–4475, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 7, 2022, Commerce 

disclosed its calculations for the Final 

Results 1 to interested parties.2 On 

January 12, 2022, the petitioners 3 and 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials 

Co., (HK) Ltd.; Jiangsu Zhongji 

Lamination Materials Stock Co., Ltd.; 

Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials 

Co., Ltd.; and Jiangsu Huafeng 

Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, Zhongji) submitted 

allegations of ministerial errors in the 

Final Results.4 On January 19, 2022, 

Zhongji filed rebuttal ministerial error 

comments.5

Legal Framework 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), defines a 

‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors 

in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical errors 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

unintentional error which the 

administering authority considers 

ministerial.’’ With respect to final 

results of administrative reviews, 19 

CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce 

‘‘will analyze any comments received 

and, if appropriate, correct any 

ministerial error by amending . . . the 

final results of review . . .’’ 

Ministerial Error 

Commerce agrees with the petitioners 

that Commerce made inadvertent, 

unintentional errors in the Final Results 

within the meaning of section 751(h) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with 

respect to its calculation of financial 

ratios from the financial statement of 

Alcomet A.B. used in the calculation of 

normal value for respondent, Zhongji. 

Accordingly, Commerce determines 

that, in accordance with section 751(h) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), it 

made ministerial errors in the Final 

Results. However, Commerce 

determines that it did not make a 

ministerial error with respect to one of 

the alleged errors and that correction of 

the other alleged ministerial error has 

no effect on the margin. 

For a complete discussion of each of 

the ministerial error allegations, as well 

as Commerce’s analysis, see the 

accompanying Ministerial Error 

Memorandum.6 The Ministerial Error 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1