alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Merrill Lynch
Credit Corporation

Private Client Group

4802 Deer Lake Drive East
Jacksonville, Florida 32246-6484
904 928 6000
800 243 0058

OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

(LOGO) Merrill Lynch



Re: Norwest Funding, Inc. ("Owner"),
    Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation ("Company"),
    Master Servicing Agreement dated as April 1, 1998 ("Agreement")



    Pursuant to the above Agreement, the Company hereby states:

                  1. A review of the  activities of the Company  during the 1999
calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the
supervision of each of the undersigned officers.

                  2. To the best of each such officer's knowledge, based on such
review,  the Company has  fulfilled  all of its material  obligations  under the
Agreement in all material  respects  throughout such year, except with regard to
the following matter:

                     In connection with certain  Mortgage Loans, the Company may
                     have  deducted  interest,  to which it was  entitled,  from
                     certain principa1 prepayments, and applied the remainder of
                     the prepayment to reduce the principal  balance The related
                     Notes contemplate that principal  prepayments be applied to
                     reduce the  amount of  principal  owed under the Note,  and
                     that the borrower be  subsequently  billed for the interest
                     owed. The practice has been discontinued.

Dated: March 31, 2000

Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation

By: Linzy S. Banks, Vice President

Ira J. Ehrlich,Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of Jungle Street, Inc., for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         247,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,642
<INVENTORY>                                     33,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               595,083
<PP&E>                                         800,298
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,580,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,741,569
<BONDS>                                        290,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,685
<OTHER-SE>                                   (465,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,580,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               715,687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               526,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (197,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stanley Marcus GALYEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-35604

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted December 14, 2016 *

Filed December 22, 2016

Stanley Marcus Galyean, Pro Se

Heidi E. Buck Morrison, Racine Olson Nye Budge & Bailey, Chtd., Pocatello, ID, for Defendants-Appellees Northwest Trustee Services Inc., Routh Crabtree Olsen PS

Cody B. Hoesly, Attorney, Larkins Va-cura LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Indymac Mortgage Services

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this' case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Stanley Marcus Galyean appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of the foreclosure of his home. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), *Hebbe v. Pliler,*627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

To the extent that Galyean raises his contract claims on appeal, the district court properly dismissed them because Ga-lyean failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. *See Hebbe,*627 F.3d at 341-42 (although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); *see also Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.,*153 Wash.2d 293, 103 P.3d 753, 759-68 (2004) (discussing unconseiona-bility of contracts under Washington law). Galyean waived any challenge to the dismissal of his other claims, most of which were dismissed as time-barred, by failing to explain in his opening brief how the district court erred. *See Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[0]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).

We reject as without merit Galyean’s contentions that Defendant IndyMac Federal Bank did not exist at the time defendants foreélosed on his home, that his loan was improperly “converted to an eMort-gage,” and that he had the right to demand production of his promissory note prior to paying it.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6160 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a 

lifespan respite care program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6160 EH

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE 

2 CARE PROGRAM. 

3 Section 2905 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 300ii–4) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2020 

5 through fiscal year 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 

6 through 2029’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6160 

AN ACT 

reauthorize a lifespan respite care program. 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to
#### Elizabeth Waugh, Administratrix, Appellant, *v. John*Fielding et al., Respondents.

(Argued January 2, 1872;

decided May term, 1872.)

This was an action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon the sale of an engine and boiler ; defence, fraud in the sale. Upon the trial, after defendants had given evidence as to plaintiff’s representations and the defects in the property . purchased, plaintiff offered himself as a witness, and was asked by his counsel, and allowed to answer, the question : “ Did you give, or intend to give, the defendants anything more than your opinion in regard to its condition?” *Held,*error. The cases of *Seymour*v. *Wilson*(14 FT. Y., 567) and *Gortla/nd*v. *Herkimer*(44 FT. Y., 22) distinguished.

*E. H. Eerm*for the appellant.

*A. Robertson*for the respondents.

Hunt, C., reads for affirmance.

All concur-.

Order affirmed, and judgment absolute against plaintiff, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001085402
<NAME>                        PIEZO INSTRUMENTS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           20,004
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        17,500
<OTHER-SE>                      (37,504)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                18,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (19,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (19,014)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8615-8616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03210]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (22-012)]


Heliophysics Advisory Committee; Space Weather Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Space Weather Council (SWC). The SWC is a 
subcommittee of the Heliophysics Advisory Committee, which functions in 
an advisory capacity to the Director, Heliophysics Division, in the 
NASA Science Mission Directorate. The meeting will be held for the 
purpose of soliciting, from the science community and other persons, 
scientific and

[[Page 8616]]

technical information relevant to program planning.

DATES: Wednesday, March 2, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: Meeting will be virtual only. See dial-in information below 
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Karshelia Kinard, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-2355 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63080211100b060f0a024d080a0d021107230d0210024d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="355e5447465d50595c541b5e5c5b544751755b5446541b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be available 
telephonically and via WebEx. You must use a touch-tone phone to 
participate in this meeting. Any interested person may dial the USA 
toll free conference call number 1-877-939-1570 or toll number 1-210-
234-0110, participant code 9775739, March 2, to participate in this 
meeting by telephone. The WebEx link is https://nasa.webex.com/; the 
meeting number is 2761 914 7537; the password is PkPJdEV@334 (case 
sensitive).
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

<bullet> Introduction of the SWC and its members
<bullet> Overview of NASA Heliophysics Division and its space weather 
activities
<bullet> Discussion of SWC future advisory topics and activities

Carol Hamilton,
Advisory Committee Management Officer (Acting), National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-03210 Filed 2-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Darrin GALARZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-750

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****

 

I, Curtis J. Parker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report onForm 10-Q of Cotelligent, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 13, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Glenn Lee WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7159

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

Glenn Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Lee Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 5:95-cr-00136-F-3 (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would hot aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
irt-ex1022_106.htm



Exhibit 10.22

Schedule of Non-Employee Director Compensation
(as revised, effective January 1, 2018)

1.Annual Retainer:

a.$40,000 cash.

b.$60,000 in common stock.

2.Annual Committee Chair Fees:

a.Audit Committee Chair - $20,000.

b.Compensation Committee Chair - $15,000.

c.Nominating and Governance Committee Chair - $10,000

3.Annual Committee Member (other than Chair) Fees:

a.Audit Committee - $7,500.

b.Compensation Committee - $5,000.

c.Nominating and Governance Committee - $5,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,451
<SECURITIES>                                     2,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,825
<INVENTORY>                                      9,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,921
<PP&E>                                          12,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           887
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,624
<SALES>                                         52,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,002
<CGS>                                           37,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,984
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,932
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,827
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,827
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.43
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****

 

I, James R. Lavelle, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report onForm 10-Q/A of Cotelligent, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 21, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               OF HOMESTORE, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Homestore, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, W.
Michael Long, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 15, 2004

                                               /s/ W. Michael Long
                                               -------------------
                                               W. Michael Long
                                               Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Homestore, Inc.
and will be retained by Homestore, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.