P. 1 

# OAR Box 1672 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# ) ll-B- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 14 of 132P. 2



### MEMORANDU

M 

# n-a- s
TO : Projec t

Fil e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHA P ES D Project

No . 96/0 5 FROM : BerndHanekeT^ ^

Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : Apri l 28,199 8 SUBJECT : Sit

e Visi t t o S T Service s (StanTrans , Inc.) , Texa s City , Texa s I . Purpos e The purpos e of

thi s sit e visi t was t o tou r th e facilit y i n a n effor t to educat e EP A and contractor personne l concerning organi c liquid s distributio n operation s an d to collec t informatio n relate d t o ai

r emission s fromth e operations . Thi s wor k i s i n suppor

t ofth e developmen

t of nationa l emissio n standard s fo

r hazardou s ai

r pollutant s (NESHAP) fo

r th e organi c liquid s distributio n (non-gasoline ) sourc e category . II . Locatio n S T Service s (StanTrans , Inc. ) Loop 197 Sout

h P.O . Bo x 360 8 Texa s City , Texa s 7759 2 Apri l 23,199 8 (9:0 0 a.m . -1:3 0 p.m. ) III . Participants S T Service s (StanTrans . Inc. ) Michael Holdma

n - Directo r o f Operation s Kyl e J . Mullin s - Manager , Environmenta l and Safet y Mar k A . Saxto n - Environmenta

l and Qualit

y Manage r Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y Mr . Stev e Shed

d - Project Officer, OAQPS/ESD/WCPG Researc h Triangl e Park , NC Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services . Inc . (PES ) GregLaFlam-RTP,N C BerndHaneke-RTP,N C 

## OC T I i iCO D
EPr t r\\?\

L/OCivE TP. 3



### Sit e Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 2 IV . Pre-Tou r Discussio n EP A Introductio n Afte r th e participant s introduced themselves , Steve Shedd , EPA , bega n th e meetin g by discussin g th e backgroun d ofth e EPA' s regulatio n o f hazardou s ai

r pollutant (HAP ) emissions . Prior to th e Clea

n Ai r Ac t Amendments of

199 0 (CAAA) , regulation s wer e on th e basi s of individua l HA P an d alimite d numbe

r of regulation s wer

e completed . Th

e CAA A include d a HA P lis t and prescribe d tha

t rule s b e developed fo

r categorie s o

f source s (industria

l types) . Th

e stringenc y ofth e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-gasoline ) rul e (fo r existin g sources ) wil l b e base d o n "floor " level s of

contro l representing th e contro l achieve d b y th e averag e ofth e bes t performing 1 2 percent

of source s i n thi s category . The standard s ar e slate d to b e propose d in 1999 , wit h promulgatio n ofth e final rul e in Novembe r 2000 . Mr . Shed d mentione d tha

t th e EP A ha s prepare d a

n industr y questionnair

e an d distribute d i t

to trad e organization s fo

r thei r review an d comment . The questionnaire , when final, wil l b e sent

t o approximatel

y 16 0 companie s i n thi s industry . H e als o describe d th e EPA' s procedure s fo

r handlin g information tha

t th e compan

y consider s to b e confidentia l busines s informatio n (CBI) . Th e compan y wil l hav e a

n opportunit

y to revie w th e draf

t sit e visi t repor t prepare d b y th e EP

A project team , an d t o commen

t o n it s accuracy and t o identif y an y CBI . The repor

t wit h an y CB I remove

d will b e mad

e apar t ofth e publi c recor

d fo r thi s rulemaking . Th e representative s o f S T Service s wer

e asked to identif

y whethe r an y ofth e informatio n i n th e conversation s an d handout s wa s confidential . N o informatio n durin g th e conversation s wa s note d b

y S T Service s t

o b e confidentia

l excep t fo r custome r names . Custome r name s wer

e no t mentioned an

d none o f wer e recorde d by th e EP

A projec t team . Facilit y Processe s S T Service s i s aprovide

r o f bul k liqui d terminalin g services . A s such , it provide s liqui d storag e capabilitie s on afor-hir e basi s whic

h conform s to th e applicabl e laws , rule s an d regulations , an d t o customers ' contract requirement s and expectations . S T Service s i s experience d i n handlin g awid e variet y o f organi c liquids , an d consider s itsel f t o b e aleade

r in it s field. The facilit

y i s physicall

y located o

n 4 4 acre s o

f land , an d ha s a n additiona

l 12. 1 acre s whic h i t ca n develo p shoul d th e need arise . S T Service s ha s a

t it s disposa

l 12 4 storag e tank s rangin g in siz e from1,00 0 t o 112,000 barrel s (Attachment

1) . Th e facility' s storag e tank s consis t o f con e roof , fixed roof

, an d interna l floatin g roo f

tanks . Th e facilit y ha s tank s which ar

e mad e o f carbo n steel an d stainles s steel . Furthermore , i

t als o ha s insulated tank s to handl e product s a t higher/lowe

r temperatures . S T Service s doe s no t

hav e an y externa l floating roo f

tank s a t th e Texa s Cit

y facilit y becaus e it s 

# 1P. 4



### Sit e Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 3 operation s ar

e no t geared towar

d petroleumproducts . Mr . Holdma

n informe d th e EP A projec t tea mtha t th e facilit y wa s currently operatin g a t 9 8 percent capacity . Thi s figure wa s calculate d b y dividin g the non-idl e tank spac e b y total capacit y o f al l tank s (2. 0 x IO 6 

### bbl) . Currently , th e managemen t o f S T Service s estimate s tha

t a t thi s level o f

utilization , ther

e ar e approximately 4 turnover s pe r yea r per tank , whic h i n total equate s t o 8. 0 x IO 6 

### bbl/yr throughput . Furthermore , th e facilit y operate s o n a2

4 hr/da y schedule , and 36 5 days/year . The EP A projec t tea minquire d an

d was tol d tha

t th e facility' s Standar d Industria

l Classificatio n (SIC ) cod

e i s 422 6 (Specia

l Warehousing , No t

Elsewher e Classified) . S T Service s als o ha s acces s t o variou s mode s o f

transportation , includin g vessel , barge , pipeline , rail , an d truck . Eac h storag e tan

k ca n loa d t o an y o f thes e modes . Th e facilit

y ha s rai l spot s fo r u p t o 8 8 rai l cars , wit

h numerou s loadin g racks . Furthermore , i t ha s 3 dock s fo

r vessels , on e o f

whic h ca n accommodat

e ship s u p t o 1,00 0 fee t in length . B y mode o f transportation , S T Service s move s mos t o f it s materia

l by tanke r ship , followe d by barge , and a n equa l distributio n betwee

n railcar s an

d tan k trucks . Currentl

y n o liquid s ar

e distribute d by pipeline . Som e ofth e majo

r liquid s which th e facilit

y i s handlin g include : Produc t Acrylate s Butadien e Propylen e oxid e Acrylic aci d Toluene/Xylen

e Methy l tert-butyl ethe

r (MTBE ) Liquid fertilize

r Caprolacta m Percento f Tota l Throughpu

t 1 0 5 2.5 2.5 1 0 ? 1 0 ? 

### Thi s lis t wa s provide d to th e EP

A project tea mb y S T Services , an

d i s no t exhaustive . Fo r

a mor e detaile d listing , consul

t Attachmen

t 1 . S T Service s treat s all o

f it s wastewate

r a t it s own treatmen

t facility . Wastewate

r a t th e facilit y i s primaril y aresult

o f stor mwater . Wastewate

r fromsewers i s als o directe d into th e treatmen t facility . 

# 3P. 5



### Site Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 4 Emission s fro

mS T Service s Mr . Saxton o

f S T Service s provide d th e EP A project tea mwit h a1997 hazardou s ai

r pollutant (HAP ) emission s inventor

y (Attachmen

t 2) . Include d i n th e emission s inventor y i s informatio n pertainin g t

o ever y tan k tha t store s aliqui d containin g HAP . Tabl e 1 summarize s thi s information : TABL E 1 . TOTA

L HA P LOSSES I

N 1997 Chemica l Nam e Sodiu mMethylat

e Dimethyformamid

e Ethyl Acrylat

e Acryli c Acid Hexamethylene Diisocyanat e MTB E Cresyli c Aci

d Methy l Methacrylat

e Toluene/Xylene(s ) Toluene Xylen e Tota l Tank(s) 31 0 40 2 502/50 5 507/601/1001/1002/150 1 657/65 9 1006/4001/5501/650 1 190 1 200 1 3002/300 4 400 2 5002/6501/1120 1 n/ a Tota l Losses (gal ) 15.0 3 23.7 7 4.0 2 267.0 6 0.002 6 1993.5 7 12.4 6 0.4 1 170.3 3 93.9 3 267.3 1 2,847.9 0 

### Th e facilit y i s not amajo r sourc e fo r HAP , an d i t emit s approximately 3 0 ton s pe r yea r (tpy ) o f VO C fromtank s an

d 8-1 0 tp y fromliqui d loading operations . Th e facilit y use s th e syntheti c organi c chemical s manufacturing industr y (SOCMI ) emissio n factor s fo

r calculating fugitiv e emission s frompump s and valves . In S T Service' s opinio n thes e emissio n factor s ar e to o high , an

d d o no t adequatel y represent

equipmen t leak s a t th e facility . S T Service s als o use s Tanks3. 1 softwar e t o calculat

e emission s fromstorag e vessels . Of specia l interes t i s th e fac t tha t th e Texa s Natura

l Resource s Conservatio n Commissio n (TNRCC ) set s alimi t

o n th e rate of

emissions , no t

on th e tota

l amount . Becaus e o f

this , man y liquid s hav e arestricte d loading rate , an d ne w product s mus t

firs t b e modele d by TNRC C 

# nP. 6



### Sit e Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . April 28,199 8 Pag e 5 befor e they ca n b e handle d by S T Services . The TNRC C will first model an d determin e permissibl e loadin g rate s t

o determine fenceline concentration s o f variou s chemicals . I t

i s becaus e o f thi s tha t som e liquid s a t S T Service s ca

n onl y b e loaded a

t arate o f 1,00 0 bbl/h r into tan k truck s an d 2,50 0 bbl/h

r int o ships/barges . Contro l Measure s S T Service s make s us e of

numerou s emissio n contro l technologie s a t it s Texa s Cit

y facility . Among thes e technologie s are : 1 . Carbon adsorptio n 2 . Therma

l incineratio n 3 . Scrubber s 4 . Flares . Wha t follow s i s adetaile d discussio n abou t thes e technologie s an

d thei r uses/application s a

t S T Services . Carbo n adsorptio n i s used primarily fo r organi c liqui d transfe

r operation s to and from tan k truck s an d railcar s wit

h liquid s havin g atru e vapor pressur e o f 0. 5 psi ao r

higher . Th e TNRC C dictate s tha

t thi s metho d mus t

hav e a t leas t a9 5 percen

t contro l efficiency . Carbo n adsorptio n system s see

n a t S T Service s consiste d o f

si x drum s (5 5 ga

l each ) i n thre e serie s o f tw o drums . Th

e carbo n canister s wer

e supplie d by CETC O Industria l Service s Grou

p an d a t on e locatio n wer

e use d t o contro l odor s fromth e loadin g of acrylates . Th e carbo n canister s ar e checke d o n aquarterly basis , an d replace d i f

necessary . Breakthrough s i n th e carbo n be d ar e determine d visually , o r

wit h avapo r sensor installe d i n alin e between th e drums . S T Service s als o make s us e o f amarin e vapor

recover y unit (MVRU ) fo

r controllin g vapor s resultin g fromth e loading of marin e vessels . The MVR U onl y collect s vapor s fromone doc k (Dock 15) . The MVR

U i s manufacture d b y John Zin k Compan y an d it s idea

l operatin g temperatur

e i s approximatel

y 1,40 0 degree s Fahrenheit

(°F) . Back-u

p fue l fo r th e MVR U i s natura l gas . TNRC C regulation s dictat e tha t th e therma

l incinerato

r b e use d fo

r loadin g compound s wit

h tru e vapor

pressure s of

0. 5 psi aor

greater . Pe

r TNRC C regulations , collectio n efficiency mus t

b e a t leas t 9 5 percen t and destructio n efficienc

y mus t b e a t leas t 9 8 percent . Temperatur

e i s monitore d continuousl

y o n th e MVR

U vi aathermocoupl e an d infrared sensor . Furthermore , th e MVR

U i s monitored by on-site personnel on adail y basis . Th e facilit y ha s tw o flare s which ar

e use d t o contro l vapor s fromrailca r loading s and storag e tank s handlin g liquid s wit h tru e vapor

pressure s greate

r tha n o r equa l t o 0. 5 psia . The flare s ar e manufacture d b

y Joh n Zin k Compan y an d ar e equipped wit

h blowers . Pe

r TNRC C regulations , flare s ar

e require d to have adestructio n efficienc y o f a t leas t 9 8 percent

and th e 

# sP. 7



### Site Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 6 collectio n efficiency ofth e vapor collectio n syste

mmus t b e a t leas t 9 5 percent . Scrubber s ar

e use d t o contro l odor s fromacrylates . For example , exces s vapor s from storag e tank s containin g acrylate s ar e route d t o scrubber s a

t th e facility . The goa

l i s t o hav e no emission s o f

acrylate s du

e to thei r pungen t odor . Al l scrubber s a

t th e facilit y mak e us e of carbo n canister s a s backups . Th e carbon canister s ar e simila r to thos e describe d above . N o specia l requirement s wer

e identifie d i n th e TNRC C permit (Attachmen

t 3 ) tha t pertaine d t o th e operatio n o f

scrubbers . Railca r Loading S T Service s has 8 8 rai l ca

r loading spots , an

d load s a n averag e o f

12-1 5 railcar s pe

r night . Railca

r loading operation s mak

e us e of vapo r recover y onl y i f th e produc t

require s it . Usually thi s wil l occu

r whe n it s tru e vapor

pressur e i s 0. 5 psi aor

greater . Vapor

recover y line s fromrailca

r loadin g g o eithe

r to aflar e o r to acarbon caniste

r adsorptio n system . Railcar s are equipped wit

h 3 inc h produc t

induction/eductio n hole s o n th e to p and ar e equippe d wit

h 1 to 2 inch hole s fo

r vapo r recovery . Onl

y top-loade d railcar s wer

e seen a t th e facility . Tan k Truck s Mos t liqui d loading a

t S T Service s i s performed wit h 3 inc h stainles s stee l hose s equippe d wit

h quick connects . Tan

k truck s ar e top-loade d wit

h liquid s tha

t do no t require vapor recovery . Tan

k truck s loadin g liquid s tha

t d o requir e vapor recover y ar e botto mloade d wit h th e to p connection s used fo r vapor contro l an d high-level alarms/overfil l protection . Sinc e th e individua

l tan k truck s ar e no t equippe d fo

r vapo r recovery , th e 3-inch cleanout port s o n th e to p ofth e truck s ar

e used whe

n vapor recover y i s required unde

r th e TNRC C rules . Tan

k truck s loadin g chemical s ma y als o b e equipped wit

h a"christma s tree " tha

t enable s themto hav e vapor

recovery/nitrogen purgin g in al l five compartments . Tan k truck s ar e inspecte d o n aDepartmen t o f Transportatio n (DOT) mandate d schedule . A rigorou s checklis t i s followed an

d leaks mus t

b e repaire d i f

found . S T Service s pressur e test s tan k truck s tha t ar e t o handl e ethy l acrylat

e an d methy l acrylat

e fo r 3 day s afte

r materia l i s loaded t

o ensur e tha t th e vehicl e ha s no emissions . Tan k truck s no t passin g th e rigorou s tightnes s test s ar

e turne d awa

y fromth e facility . Furthermore , tan k truck s whic h ar

e no t equippe d fo

r vapor recovery/contro l ar

e als o turne d awa

y fromth e facility . Wastewate

r Treatmen t S T Service s operate s it s own wastewate r treatmen t facility . Furthermore , th e facilit y 

# IP. 8



### Sit e Visit Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 7 ha s tw o discharg e permits , one covering non-contact stormwater , th e othe

r coverin g contac t stormwater . Non-contac t

stormwate

r i s discharged directly into Galvesto n Bay , an d stormwate

r coming int o contac t wit h organi c liquid s i s route d int o a n ope n top collectio n tank . The facilit y ha s aserie s of

pipe s and open trenche s whic h direc t stormwate

r into di e collectio n tank . Contac t stormwate

r passe s through askimme

r (no t a n actua l AP I oil/wate r separator) , which remove s oil . The actua l treatmen t basin i s a212,00 0 gallo n ope n basin wit

h continuou s aeration . T o maintai n ahealthy populatio n of bacteria , sanitar

y sewe r wastewate

r i s mixe d wit

h th e contac t

stormwater . Followin g biologica l degradation , th e wate

r i s sen t to aclarifie

r fro m which i t i s then discharge d int

o Galveston Bay . Personnel a t S T Service s estimat

e tha t a n approximat

e volum e of 40,00 0 gal/da

y ar e treate d a t th e facility , but

actua l volume s depen d upo n daily rainfall . B y lette r date d Augus t

12,199 8 (Attachmen

t 4 ) S T Service s informed th e EP A tha t wastewate

r quantitie s and concentration s o f HA P withi n th e wastewate

r ar e movin g target s an d tha t record s ar e no t kept . S T Service s als o informed th e EP A tha t wastewate

r containin g "copious " amount s of HA P i s drumme

d an d dispose d of

a s hazardou s waste . Sludg e fromth e wastewate r treatmen t facilit y i s shippe d offsit

e b y acontractor . Th e facilit y ha s no othe

r source s of

sludge . Fugitiv e Emission s Fugitiv e emission s a

t th e S T Service s facilit

y ar e principally frompumps , flanges , and valves . Ther

e ar e 15 9 pump s a

t th e facility , of

which 3 5 servic e liquid s wit h vapor pressure s greate r tha n or equa l to 0. 5 psia . Additionally , ther e ar e 3,22 5 valve s in ligh

t liquid/light

oi l service , and atotal o f

7,28 5 flange s (Attachmen

t 5) . Per TNRC C regulations , flange s mus t b e inspecte d by visual , audible , and/or olfactor y mean s at

leas t weekly b y operatin g personne l walk-throughs . Valve s ar

e checked b

y acontractor

o n aquarterly basi s fo

r leak s usin g a

n approved gas analyzer . Al l pum p seal s ar e checked quarterly wit

h aga s analyzer . Equipmen t foun d t o b e leakin g VO C i n exces s o f 10,000 ppmv , or

foun d t o b e leakin g by routine checks mus t

b e tagge d an

d repaired withi n 1 5 days . Pe r TNRC C regulations , only unde r extrem e condition s ca

n there b e an

y deviatio n fromthi s requirement . S T Service s informed th e EP

A projec t tea mtha t dail y checks wer

e standard , and tha

t an y equipmen

t found t o b e leakin g wa s usuall y repaire d within hour s following th e detection . V . PlantTou r Following th e sit-dow n discussion , Mr . Saxton too k th e EP A projec t tea mo n atou r

o f th e facility . Th e first

sto p o n th e tour

was to observ e aloadin g rack dedicate d t o acrylates . A scrubber , used t o neutraliz e acrylat e odors , a s well a s thre e serie s of tw o interlinke d carbo n canister s wer

e observed . 

# 1P. 9



### Sit e Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28,199 8 Pag e 8 Followin g this , Mr . Saxton showed th e EP A project tea matruc k loadin g rac k

dedicate d to loadin g of

methy l acrylate . A 2-inch gree n vapo r retur n hose , a s well a s th e fillin g hose/pip e wer e observed . Tw o carbon canister s wer e als o see n a t th e site . Mr . Saxto n informed th e tea m tha t asingl e carbo n caniste

r ha d t o achiev e a

t leas t 9 5 percen t control , whil e aconnecte d pai r o f tw o carbo n canister s ha

d to achieve 9 9 percent

control . Next , Mr . Saxto n showe

d th e tea mDock 1 6 (shared wit

h othe r companies) , whic h i s no t hooked into th e marin e vapo r recover y unit . A t thi s poin t Mr . Saxton informed th e tea mtha t Doc k 1 5 control s vapor s vi ath e MVRU , and tha t th e thir d dock , Doc

k 1 9 ha s no vapo r

contro l devices . Mr . Saxto n the n took

th e EP A projec t tea mto arailca

r loading spot . A railca

r wa s observed , a s wa s th e loading ar man d vapor recover y line . Thi s loadin g spo t

wa s dedicate d t

o dr y liquid s ( 0 percent

water ) an d thu s wa s connected to tw o carbon canisters . Furthermore , thi s railca r loadin g spo t

wa s equipped t o provide nitrogen blanketin g i n th e railcar . Th e nitroge n blanketin g wa s require d fo

r Monder , adr

y liquid . The rai l ca

r observed a

t th e site ha

d atotal storag e capacit

y of 20,65 9 gallons . Th e wastewate

r treatmen t facilit y wa s scrutinize d afte

r th e railca r loadin g spot . Th e wastewate r treatment facilit y consiste d of

a n ope n storag e tank , alarg e open bioreactor , clarifier , an d drain . Th e wastewate r wa s aerate d heavily , an

d ha d abrownis h color . Th e clarifie r an d drai n wer

e als o inspected , an

d it wa s estimate d by the EP

A projec t tea mtha t a n approximat

e 1 0 gal/h r wa s discharge d int

o Galveston Bay . Th

e wastewate

r treatmen t basi n wa s als o estimate d t o b e approximatel y 10 0 fee t long , an d 3 0 fee t wide . Locate d next

to th e wastewate

r treatmen t plant wa s th e Joh

n Zin k marin e vapor recover y uni t and th e tw o Joh

n Zin k flares . The MVR

U wa s observed to b e functioning normally a

t 1400°F . Th

e tw o flares wer

e equippe d wit

h blower s t

o contro l vapor s fromstorag e tanks . A boiler

fo r heat/stea mwa s observe d nea

r th e flares . The heat/stea

mfromth e boiler

i s used to hea

t insulate d storag e vessels . Doc k 1 5 and it s vapo

r retur n connectio n lin e wer

e observed briefly b y th e EP A projec t team . Th e "pi t

area " wa s als o observed by th e team . I t i s a t thi s locatio n tha

t produc t from marine vessel s ca

n b e directe d int

o an y numbe r o f tanks . The final sto p wa s a

t atruc k loadin g rack

fo r acrylates , which a

t th e time wa s empty . Vapo r retur n line s a s wel l a s produc t

line s wer e observed . Th

e theoretica

l operatio n ofth e systemwa s als o discusse d o n site .

%P.1 0



### Sit e Visi t Memo/S T Services , Inc . Apri l 28 , 199 8 Pag e 9 VI . Post-Tou r Discussio n A brie f post-tou r discussio n wa s hel d in whic h Mr . Hanek

e expresse d hi s desir

e t o obtai n acop y ofth e ai

r emission s inventor

y detailin g emission s fromtanks , produc t loading operations , and fugitive emission s fromS T Services . Photocopie s o f variou s document s (se e Attachments ) wer

e mad e an d hande d t o the EP A project team . Followin g this , th e EP A projec t tea mthanke d th e personnel fro mS T Service s an

d th e tou r wa s concluded . VII . Actio n Items Th e EP A project tea minquired , an

d S T Service s agreed to provid e informatio n o n th e followin g item s (i f

available) : 1 . Wastewate

r generatio n rate s an

d source s of

wastewate r generatio n 2 . HA P conten t o f wastewate

r 3 . Incoming an

d outgoin g HA

P concentration s of

wastewate

r 4 . Tota l emission s o f

VO C and HA

P fromth e facilit

y in 1997 .



# 1P.1 1



# STANTRANS , IN C TEXA S CITY , TEXA S

A KANEB COMPANY 

# I IP.1 2



# S T Service s

Mftiiian u

Wyonitm ; \ , Nort h Dakot a \

Minnesot a /~/%L

\ i

\ ^ ^

LNevad a

\ Callfoi'nl a 1 - Sout h Dakot a

Nobrusic i 

# c a N^l | H«ITip3llll'< J InsaachuMitt

t

Uta h

^•Jl'V'

. IVllUt u 

## C ^ 

# c n G D

Okituioai p Wisconsi n £/ J / " V , - Nli w , orl ( > ^-^ ^ |5lu| v Connocilcu t " 1 tmwm I

Michiga n / J. """ " V ••£"'" '

r^jpilu.ta u ^ 0|lj . . j \

..y;:-.^. ;

i lllinol i Mlcsuiir i Tqiiimssiii . Affianvw s /- " Dalla s L - - f ^ ? i Wt il.O'.liiiisllK

J / -r

" \Suiitlif.'oiai! i \Goorglp A Alnbum o 

## CH ) I'lorlr'- . '



# m Terminal Location s No . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 Location s Alamogordo , N M Andrew s AFB , M D Augusta , G A Baltimore , M D Bremen , G A Brunswick , G A Chillicothe , I L Columbus , G A Drumright , O K Dumfries , VA Homestead , F L Imperial , C A Indianapolis , I N Jacksonville , F L Macon , G A Milwaukee , W I No . o f

Tank s 5 3 8 4 9 8 3 6 2 5 4 1 6 2 6 1 8 3 0 1 0 7 Capacit y (bbls. ) 120,00 0 72,00 0 110,00 0 821,00 0 180,00 0 302,00 0 270,00 0 180,00 0 315,00 0 554,00 0 72,00 0 124,00 0 410,00 0 2,066,00 0 307,00 0 308,00 0 Mode s

Serve d P. T P. B P. T P,T,R,V, B P. T T, B P.T. R T.R. B P. T P.T. B P P. T P. T T.R.V. B P. T V.B.T. R No .

1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 Location s Montgomery , A L Moundville , A L Peru , I L Pine y Point , M D Salina , K S Sa n Antonio , T X Savannah , G A Stockton , C A Texa s City , T X Tucson , A 2 Virgini a Beach , V A Washington , D C Washington , D C Westwego , L

A Winona , M N No . o f

Tank s 7 6 8 2 8 1 0 4 1 7 1 8 12 4 7 2 5 3 5 4 7 Capacit y (bbls. ) 162,00 0 310,00 0 221,00 0 5,403,00 0 98,00 0 207,00 0 699,00 0 314,00 0 2,002,00 0 181,00 0 40,00 0 176,00 0 133,00 0 858,00 0 229,00 0 Mode s

Serve d P. T P. T P.T. B P,T,V, B P. T P. T T.R.V. B P. T T,R,V, B P. T P. B P. T P.T. B T,R,V, B T,R, B 8 - Barg e T - Truc k

R - Rai l P - Pipelin e V - Vesse l 

## Marketin g Offices DALLAS - HEADQUARTER S 1730 4 Presto n Road , Suit e 100 0 Dallas , Texa s 75252-562 3 (972 ) 931-806 5 (972)931-652 6 FA

X STA N TRANS , Inc .

20 1 Doc k Roa d Texa s City , Texa s 7759 0 (409 ) 948-356 1 (409 ) 948-446 0 FA

X PINE Y POIN T TERMINA L

1787 7 Pine y Poin tRoa d Pine y Point , M D 2067 4 (301 ) 994-120 0 (301 ) 994-274 4 FA

X

1VV W MOttPOMOClPn - UQUt O 

# ILT A

KKMMM J MSOCttlKI N interne tHom e Page : www.3tservices.ne t BUL K LIQUI D TERMINALIN G NATIONWID E

A KANE B COMPAN Y j ^P.1 3



## 05/21/9 3 

# StanTrans, Inc. QUALIT Y POLIC Y
StanTrans , Inc . i s committe d t o providin g liqui d terminalin g service s whic h confor m t o th e applicabl e laws , rule s an d regulations , an d t o ou rcustomers ' contract requirement s an d expectation s i n a timel y an d cos t effectiv e manne rfo r bot h ou rcustomers an d ourselves . Ou rqualit y progra m wil l resul t i n greate rcustome rconfidenc e an d satisfaction , improv e compan y productivity an d profitability , an d strengthe n ou rpositio n i n th e terminalin g industry . Throug h ou rqualit y program , eac h employe e wil l hav e th e mean s t o b e involve d i n th e continuin g updat e an d improvemen t o f al l ou rsystems . Managemen t wil l commi t th e resource s necessar y t o maintai n an d continuall y improve th e quality program , an d wil l encourag e a spiri t o f innovatio n an d participatio n b y al l personne l i n ou rtota l quality effort .



# <a £ Fre d T. Johnso n Ronal d A . Rushto n Presiden t Senio rVic e Presiden t



# I 3/ \ 

# IS O 900 0 CERTIFICAT E O F COMPLIANC E ^W,iMN| ;



### Thi s I s t o certif y tha tth e Quality Managemen tSyste m of : 

# STANTRANS , INC . 111 1 MAI N DOC K ROA D TEXA S CITY , T X 7759 0 ha s bee n assesse d b y AB S Qualit y Evaluations , Inc . an d foun d t o b e i n complianc e wit h th e followin g qualit y standards :



# IS O 900 2 Th e Qualit y Managemen tSyste m i s applicabl e to : PROVISIO N O F BUL K LIQUI D STORAG E SERVICE S 

# -f r
Certificat e No. : Effective Date : Expiration Date : Rev . No./Date : 3083 1 2 5 Octobe

r 199 5 2 4 Octobe

r 199 8 0/2 5 Octobe

r 199 5 behal f o f ABS Qualit

y Evaluations , Inc . 

## -f l Eva/ ^

» >

Acvnililci l h y •hi - Until ) Counci l tor(c i lifiialiu n Validit y o f

Ihi s certificat e i s subjec t l o th e organizatio n an d procedure s bein g audite d twic e annuall y ani l Ih e audite d compan y submittin g t o AH S Qualit y Evaluations , Inc . interi mwritte n report s of an y majo r

change s i n th e element s o f it s Qualit y Managemen t System . ABS Qualit

y evaluations . Inc . 1885 5 Northchas e Drive , Houston . Texa s 7706 0 U.S.A.P.1 6



### StanTrans , Inc . Texa s City , Texa s Termina l IS O 900 2 CERTIFIE D 20 1 Doc k Road Texa s City , T

X 7759 0 o r P.O . Bo x 360 8 Texa s City , T

X 77592-360 8

MANAGED

BY: Ronal d A . Rushto n

Michae l D . Holdma n Joh n R . Springe r TE L Number : FA X Number : TE L Number : FA X Number : Executiv e Vic e Presiden t (Dallas , TX ) Directo ro f Operation s (Texa s City , TX ) Genera l Manage r(Texa s City , TX ) (409 ) 948-356 1 (Mr . Holdman) (409 ) 948-446 0 (Mr . Holdman ) (972 ) 931-806 5 (Mr . Rushton ) (972 ) 931-652 6 (Mr . Rushton ) MODES SERVED: Vessel , Barge , Pipeline , Rail , Truc k SCALE FACILITIES:

Truc k

Platfor m Scales/Rai l Ca rScale s (Two ) TRUCK FACILITIES:

Truc k

Loading/Unloadin g Facilities , Scal e an d Meter s RAILSPUR

DATA: Privat e Spur , 8 5 Cars ; Leas e Track , 1350 '

Rai l spot s fo ru p t o 6 8 simultaneou s rai l ca rloadings/unloadings ; serve d b y Texa s Cit y Termina l Railwa y Co . (Sant a Fe , Souther n Pacific/Unio n Pacific , Burlingto n Northern ) DOCK/VESSELDATA: Thre e (3 ) Ship/Barg e Docks , 40-50,00 0 DWT , Maximu m Bea m 110' , Maximu m Length 1000' , 4 0 ML W wit h vehicl e acces s Doc k 15 : Barg e an d Ship , 36 ' Draft , 900 ' Length , 110 ' Widt h Doc k 16 : 40 * Draft , 1000 ' Length , Unlimite d Widt h Doc k 19 : 36 ' Draft , 800 ' Length , 110 ' Widt h STORAGE

TANKS: 

### 12

4 Tota l Capacit y Gallons : Barrels : Rang e i n Size s M3 : 

### Gallons : Barrels : M3 : 84,084,00 0 2,002,00 0 318,31 8 42,000-4,704,00 0 1,000-112,00 0 159-17,80 8 Texa s City , T X Dat a Shee t Pag e 1 o f 3 j (p Revise d 11/24/9 7P.1 7



### OTHER FACILITIES

AND SERVICES: A . Intermoda l ex-rai l B . Approve d AT F Facilit y (Bonded ) C . U.S . Custom s Bonde d Warehous e D . Direc

t Transfer s barge-shi p an d rail-shi p an d vice-vers a E . Al l majo rchemica l vessel s cal l a t termina l F . Stor

e specialt y chemical s wit h hig h purit y requirement s G . Lease d railroa d trackag e availabl e H . Refrigerated , insulated , heated , line d an d floatin g roo f tanks I . Expansio n acreag e availabl e J . 150-to n combinatio n truck/rai l scal e K . 60-to n truc k

scal e (70' ) L . Boile rsupplie d stea m (2 ) -150# , 75 0 H P M . 150,00 0 cu./ft./hr . nitroge n capabilitie s N . Multipl e flar e system s O . Fire fightin g syste m P . Wast e wate rtreatmen t syste m Q . Vapo rincineratio n capabilitie s (rail , truc k an d water

) R . Stainles s stee l storag e COMMODITIES

HANDLED: A . Petroleu m an d Gas Products : •1 . Ligh t Oil s 2 . Solvent s 3 . # 2 Fue l Oi l 4 . # 6 Fue l Oi l 5 . Gasolin e Blen d Stock s 6 . Lub e Oil s B . Chemical s (See Nex t Pag e Please) S T store s al l majo r chemical s includin g Olefins , Aromatics , Aldehydes , Alcohols , Amines , Waxes , Acids , etc .

Texa s City , T

X Dat a Shee t Pag e 2 o f 3 / f- Revise d 11/24/9 7P.1 8

B . 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 9. 10 . 11 . 12 . 13 . 14 . 15 . 16 . 17 . 18 . 19 . 20 . 21 . 22 . 23 . 24 . 25 . 26 . 27 . 28 . 29 . 30 . 31 . 32 . 33 . 34 . 35 . 36 . 37 . 38 . 39 . 40 . 41 . 42 . 43 . 44 . 45 . 46 . 47 . Chemical s Acetaldehyd e Aceti c Anhydrid e Aceton e Aceton e Cyanohydri n Acetonitril e Acryli c Aci d Alkenylsuccini c Anhydrid e Alph a Olefin s Ammoniu m Bisulfit e Ammoniu m Hydroxid e Anilin e Anolo n Aromatic/Hydrocarbo n Mixtur e Asphal t Benzen e Butadien e Butanedio l N-Butano l Butene- 1 N-Butylacetat e N-Butylacrylat e N-Butylalcoho l Butylen e Glyco l Butylen e Oxid e Butyrolacton e Caprolacta m (Repro. ) Carbo n Blac k

Oi l Causti c Potas h Causti c Sod a Chlorofor m Cor n Syru p Cotto n See d Oi l Cresyli c Aci d Crud e Caprolacta m Crud e Industria l Ethano l Cumen e Cyclohexan e Cyclohexano l Cyclohexanon e Cyclohexylamin e Denature d Alcoho l Dicyclopentadien e Diethanolamin e Diisobutylen e Diisopropylamin e Dimethylaminopropylamin e Dimethylcyclohexylamin e

Texa s City , T X Dat a Shee t 48 . 49 . 50 . 51 . 52 . 53 . 54 . 55 . 56 . 57 . 58 . 59 . 60 . 61 . 62 . 63 . 64 . 65 . 66 . 67 . 68 . 69 . 70 . 71 . 72 . 73 . 74 . 75 . 76 . 77 . 78 . 79 . 80 . 81 . 82 . 83 . 84 . 85 . 86 . 87 . 88 . 89 . 90 . 91 . 92 . 93 . 94 . 95 . Dimethylformamid e D i Norma l Propylamin e Dio l Fraction s Distillate s Ethano l Ethy l Acetat e Ethy l Acrylat e Ethy l Benzen e N-Ethy l Cyclohexylamin e 2-Ethy l Hexano l Ethy l Hexoi c Aci d Ethy l Hexy l Acrylat e Ethylbenzen e Ethylen e Diamine s Ethylen e Dichlorid e Ethylen e Glyco l Diacetat e Formi c Acid Fue l Oi l Additiv e Glycerin e Glycery l Triacetat e Heavy Aromati c Distillat e Heavy Aromati c Oil Hexan e Hexylen e Glyco l Isobuty l Acetat e Isobuty l Acrylat e Isobuty l Alcoho l Isobutylen e Isophoron e Isopren e Isopropy l Alcoho l Late x Solutio n Met a Sodiu m Methano l Methy l Acrylat e Methy l Chlorid e Methy l Ethy l Keton e Methy l Format e Methy l Isobuty l Keton e N-Methy l Pyrrolidon e Methy l Tertiary Buty l Ethe r 3-Methylbutyri c Aci d Methylen e Chlorid e Micr o Crystallin e Wa x Minera l Spirit s Monoalcohol s - H D Monochlorobenzen e Monoethanolamin e



### Pag e 3 o f 3 | g 96 . Morpholin e

97 . Napth a 98 . Napthalen e 99 . Nia x Polyo l 100 . Nitr o Ethan e 101 . Nitr o Propan e 102 . Nitroge n 103 . Nitrotoluen e 104 . Ortho-Nitrotoluen e 105 . Ortho-Toluenediamin e 106.PACN2 0 107 . Para-Dichlorobenzen e 108 . Paraffi n Wa x 109 . Paraxylen e 110 . Perchloroethylen e 111 . Phosphori c Acid 112 . Piperylen e Concentrat e 113 . Pol y (Oxyalkylene ) 114 . Pol y Was h Wate r 115 . Polybuten e 116 . Pol y butene/Xylen e 117 . Polymeri c M.D.I . 118 . Polypropylen e Glyco l 119 . Propionitril e 120 . Propylen e Glyco l 121 . Propylen e Oxid e 122 . Propylen e Tetrame r 123 . PyrolysisTa r 124 . Resi n Plasticize r 125 . Slac k

Wa x 126 . Sodiu m Carbonat e 127 . Sulphuri c Aci d 128 . Tal l Oil Fatt y Acid 129 . Tergito l 130.Tetrahydrofura n 131 . Toluen e 132 . Toluen e Diisocyanat e 133 . Trichlorethan e 134 . Trichiorethylen e (11 1 & 124 ) 135 . Trichlorobenzen e (124 ) 136 . Triethanolamin e 137 . Triethylamin e 138 . Triethylen e Glyco l 139 . Viny l Acetat e Monome r 140 . Viny l Toluen e 141 . Whit e Minera l Oi l 142 . Xylen e

Revise d 11/24/9 7P.1 9P.2 0


## StanTrans , Inc . 

# Mem o

T « Bem d Hanek

e From : Mark

Saxto n CC : Date : Apri l 24,199 8 Re : EPA/PE S Environmenta l Surve y Dea rMr . Haneke , I apologiz e fo rth e inconvenienc e wit h th e e-mail . Th e followin g page s ar e th e printe d repo t fo r1997 emissions . I f I ca n b e o

f any furthe rassistance , pleas e contac t m e a t you rearlies

t convenience . Sincerel y yours , Mark Saxto n Environmental/Qualit

y Manage r StanTrans , Inc .

• Page l 

# a

iEPA/PE S Environmental Survey



### S O 

## 5 0 Chemica l Nam e Sodiu m Methylat e Dimethylformamid e Ethy l Acrylat e Acryli c Aci d Hexamethylen e Diisocyanat e

MTB E Cresyli c Aci d Methy l Methacrylat e Toluene/Xylen e Toluen e Xylen e 

## Tota l HA P losse s Tank(s ) 31 0 40 2 502/50 5 507/601/1001/1002/150 1 657/65 9 1006/4001/5501/650 1 190 1 200 1 3002/300 4 400 2 5002/6501/1120 1 Tota l Losse s (Gallons ) 15.0 3 23.7 7 4.0 2 267.0 6 0.002 6 1993.5 7 12.4 6 0.4 1 170.3 3 93.9 3 267.3 1



### Tota l HA P Emission s 2347.9 0

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 Page l h oMAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 31 0

Produc tName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Sodiu m Methylat

e 5 4 7 0 0.710 1 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vessel Truc k Rai l Shi p Barg e Barrel s 12,94 3 0 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

245.02 5 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP

Y 0.122 5 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 

## 9 0 

## L P Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 113.8 2

15.0 3 Loadin g losse s

Total Pounds L 245.02 5 Controlle d Tota l TPY [ Controlle d 4.900 5

0.122 5 0.002 5

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 40 2

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : DM F 73. 1 7 0 0.0 7 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vesse

l Truc k Rai l Shi p Barg e Barrel s 11,70 9 0 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

29.58 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y 0.014 8 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 

## 5 0 Tan k losse s (pounds ) 159.7 2 Loadin g losse s Tota l Pounds f

2938 0 Total TPY | 0.014 8 Tota l losse s gallon s 23.7 7

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tan k 50 2 Produc t Name : Molecular

Weight : Averag e Temperatur e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : E A 100. 1 7 0 0.701 1 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truc k Rai l Shi p Barg e Barrel s 22,28 2 1,82 4 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

772.02 2 63.19 8 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y

0.386 0 0.031 6 0.000 0 0.000 0 

## s o Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 8.021 6

1.3 1 Loadin g

Tota l Pound s L Controlle d Tota l TP Y Controlle d losse s

83S.220 | 2.088 0 0.417 6 0.001 0

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 50 5

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : EA 100. 1 7 0 0.701 1 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truck Rail Shi p Barg e Barrel s 2331 0 404 8 84 7 0 Losse s Lbs .

81436 9 147.18 4 11.73 9 0.00 0 TPY

0.407 3 0.073 6 0.005 9 0.000 0 

## s o Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 16.049 5

2.4 2 Loadin

Tota l Pounds Controlled Total TP Y Controlled 

# I losse s

973.49 2 2.639 2 0.486 7 0.001 3

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tank 50 7

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Average Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : AA E 7 2 7 0 0.062 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truc k Rail Shi p Barg e Barrel s 3,93 3 42 3 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

8.71 0 053 7 0.00 0 0.00 0 TPY

0.004 4 0.000 5 0.000 0 0.000 0 

### S O Tank losse s (pounds ) 218.0 2 Loadin g losse s Total Pounds !

ne l 9.64 7 Tota l TP Y 0.004 8 Tota l losse s gallon s 25.8 4

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU M HOURL Y LOADIN G EMISSION S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION )

Tan k 60 1 Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Average Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : AAE 72 7 0 0.062 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truck Rai l Shi p Barg e Barrel s 536 1 1,98 4 12,18 5 0 Losse s Lbs .

12.31 5 4.39 4 10.79 4 0.00 0 TP Y 0.006 2 0.002 2 0.005 4 0.000 0 

## s o Tan k losse s (pounds ) 340.9 3 Loadin g losse s Tota l Pound s f

_ 27.50 2 Tota l TP Y 0.013 8 Tota l losse

s gallon s 41.8 1

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU M HOURLY LOADIN G EMISSION S

(AP-4 2 CALCULATION )

Produc tName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Receivin g Vesse l

Truc k Rai l Shi p Barg e Tan k losse s (pounds ) 

# so _ 2 > Tota l losse s gallon s

StanTrans , Inc . Tan k 65 7 HMD I 16 8 7 0 0.000 7
Barrel s 635 2 0 0 0 0.012 1

0.001 5

4/24/9 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Losse s Lbs . 036 9 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y

0.000 2 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 Loadin g losse s Tota l Pounds ! 036 9 Controlle d 0.000 9 Tota l TPY | 0.000 2 Controlle d 0.000 0 . •

8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tank 65 9

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : HMD I 16 8 7 0 0.000 7 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse

l Truc k Rail Shi p Barg e Barrel s 3,76 6 3^8 1 ' 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.21 9 0.22 5 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 0 0.000 0 Loadin g losse s 

# o Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 0.00 9

0.001 2 Total Pound s

Controlle d Total TP Y Controlle d 

# 'f _ 0.44 4 0.001 1 0.000 2 0.000 0

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)



# u Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Receivin g Vessel

Truck Ra U Shi p Barg e Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s

StanTrans , Inc . Tan k 80 8 Ethy l Acrylat e 100. 1 7 0 0.701 1 Barrel s 6,66 9 9,73 7 0 0 0.860 9

0.3 0

4/24/9 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Losse s Lbs . 231.06 6 33736 6 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP

Y 0.115 5 0.168 7 0.000 0 0.000 0 Loadin g losse s Total Pounds ! 568.43 2 Controlle d 1.421 1 Total TP Y 0.284 2 Controlle d 0.000 7

1 0MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 100 1

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : AA E 7 2 7 0 0.062 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truck Rai l Shi p Barg e Barrel s 54,11 3 8,48 4 0 9,69 2 Losse s Lbs .

119.83 5 18.78 8 0.00 0 21.46 3 TP Y 0.059 9 0.009 4 0.000 0 0.0107 Loadin g losse s 

### <o 4 

## 3 0 Tank losse s (pounds ) 780.1 3 Total Pounds [ Total TPY

f 160.08 6 0.080 0 Tota l losse s gallon s 106.7 1

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 1 C OMAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 100 2

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : AA E 7 2 7 0 0.062 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vessel Truc k Rai l Shi p Barge Barrel s 3230 9 14,23 5 833 5 0 Losse s Lbs .

71.99 2 3132 4 738 3 0.00 0 TP

Y 0.036 0 0.015 8 0.003 7 0.000 0 

# i n Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 702.9 3

923 7 Total Pound s

Tota l TPY 

# V 110.89 9

0.055 4

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 2MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tank 100 6

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : MTB E 88.1 5 7 0 3.9 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vesse l Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 0 0 0 48,17 5 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 8239.44 7 TP Y 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 4.119 7 Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 2848. 6

484.5 5 Loadin g losse s

Tota l Pounds L Controlle d Tota l TP Y Controlle d 8239.447 1

164.788 9 4.119 7 0.082 4

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 3MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 150 1

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : AA E 7 2 7 0 0.062 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truck Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 76,22 8 2,00 6 5,00 2 6,06 0 Losse s Lbs .

168.80 9 4.44 2 4.43 1 13.42 0 TP Y 0.084 4 0.002 2 0.002 2 0.006 7 Loading losse s Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 2.444 3

03 3 n g Tota l Pounds L Controlled Tota l TP Y Controlled 191.10 3

0.477 8 0.095 6 0.000 2

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 4MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tan k 190 1

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Cresyli c Aci d 11 3 7 0 0.005 5 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 0 0 47,67 1 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 0.00 0 5.85 1 0.00 0 TP

Y 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.002 9 0.000 0 Loadin g losse

s Tank losse s (pounds ) 102.1 9 Tota l Pound s 5.85 1 Tota l TP Y 0.002 9 Tota l losse

s gallon s 12.4 6

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 5MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 200 1 Produc tName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : MM A 10 0 7 0 034 1 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 330 7 26,08 8 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

101.68 1 696.78 6 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y 0.050 8 0348 4 0.000 0 0.000 0 

# u Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 1378 6

0.4 1 Loadin i Total Pound s Controlle d Total TP Y Controlle d 

# I losse s

798.46 8 1.9962 0399 2 0.001 0

StanTrans , Inc. 4/24/9 8 1 6MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 300 1

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Toluene/Xylene 93.0 7 7 0 0383 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 3035 6 81,12 4 0 836 5 Losse s Lbs .

81439 1 2176.12 9 0.00 0 221.70 6 TP Y 0.407 1 1.088 1 0.000 0 0.110 9 Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 341.4 7

55.9 9 Loadin g losse s

Tota l Pounds ! 3212.127 | Controlle d 64.242 5 Tota l TP Y 1.606 1 Controlle d 0.032 1

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 7MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 300 2

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Toluene/Xylen e 93.0 7 7 0 0383 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse

l Truc k Rai l Ship Barge Barrel s 0 179,61 9 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 4818.23 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 • TP

Y 0.000 0 2.409 1 0.000 0 0.000 0 $ Loadin g losse s Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gaUon s 639.8 8

101.6 1 ug

Tota l Pounds| _ Controlle d 481833 0

96364 6 Tota l TPY [ Controlle d 2.409 1

0.048 2

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 8MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 300 4

ProductName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Toluene/Xylen e 93.0 7 7 0 0383 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vesse

l Truc k Ra U Shi p Barge Barrel s 0 101,42 2 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 2720.61 7 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y 0.000 0 1360 3 0.000 0 0.000 0 

# O Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 4433 5

68.7 2 Loadin g

Total Pound s [

_ Controlle d Tota l TP Y Controlle d losse s

2720.617 1 54.412 3 1360 3 0.027 2

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 1 9MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 400 1 Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperatur e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : MTB E 88.1 5 7 0 3.9 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truck Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 0 0 0 37739 8 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 64581.18 7 TP Y 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 32390 6 !losse s 

# + Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 30543 6

698.8 6 Loading

Total Pounds ! 64581.18 7 Controlled 1291.623 7 Tota l TP Y 32390 6 Controlled 0.645 8

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 0MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 400 2

Produc tName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Toluene 9 2 7 0 0.42 5 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truck Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 107,607 111,96 9 37,61 7 42,67 5 Losse s Lbs .

207730 2 2161.40 4 290.45 7 823.78 1 TP Y 1.038 6 1.080 7 0.145 2 0.411 9 Loadin g losse s Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 5743 5

93.9 3 Total Pounds| _

Controlled Total TP Y Controlled 5352.84 5

107.056 9 2.676 4 0.053 5

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 1 T lMAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 500 2

Produc tName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Xylen e 106. 2 7 0 0.130 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vessel Truc k Ra U Ship Barg e Barrel s 18 3 9638 3 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

135 5 660.98 9 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y 0.000 6 0330 5 0.000 0 0.000 0

• 7 > Tan k losse s (pounds ) Tota l losse s gaUon s 168.0 6 114.5 7 Loadin g losse s

Tota l Pound s [

_ 662.244 1 Tota l TPY | 0331 1

StanTrans , Inc. 4/24/9 8 2 2 

## feMAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tank 550 1

Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperatur

e Vapo r Pressure : ESL : MTB E 88.1 5 7 0 3.9 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receiving Vesse l Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 0 8,44 2 42,74 9 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 1443.84 9 292437 2 0.00 0 TPY

0.000 0 0.721 9 1.462 3 0.000 0

* Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 1804.8 7

260.6 4 ng l Loadin g losse s Total Pound s Controlle d Tota l TP Y Controlle d 4368.42 0

87.368 4 2.184 2 0.043 7

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 3MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)
Tan k 650 1

ProductName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : MTB E 88.1 5 7 0 039 3 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vessel Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrel s 9932 0 171,79 7 0 143,97 6 Losse s Lbs .

1707.23 7 293837 1 0.00 0 2462.44 4 TP Y 0.853 6 1.469 1 0.000 0 1.231 2 Tan k losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gaUon s 3847.4 3

549.5 3 Loadtn ;

Tota l Pound s Controlled Tota l TP Y Controlled 

# t

losse s 7107.953 | 142.159 1 33540 | 0.071 1

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 4MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tan k 650 1

ProductName : Molecula r Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Xylen e 106. 2 7 0 0.130 8 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse

l Truc k Rai l Ship Barg e Barrel s 0 10,62 8 0 0 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 72.88 6 0.00 0 0.00 0 TP Y

0.000 0 0.036 4 0.000 0 0.000 0 Tank losse s (pounds )

Tota l losse s gallon s 12.0 5

11.7 2 Loadin

Total Pound s 

# t losse s 72.88 6 Tota l TPY } 0036 4

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 5MAXIMU

M HOURL

Y LOADIN

G EMISSION

S (AP-4 2 CALCULATION

)

Tan k 1120 1 Produc tName : Molecular Weight : Averag e Temperature Vapo r Pressure : ESL : Met a Xylene 106.1 8 7 0 0.130 4 (degree s F )

@Tem p (ug/m3 ) Receivin g Vesse l Truc k Ra U Shi p Barg e Barrels 0 0 54,19 4 98,78 9 Losse s Lbs .

0.00 0 0.00 0 148.18 1 675.29 0 TP Y 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.074 1 0337 6 Tank losse s (pounds ) 1983 4 Loadin g losse s Total Pound s L 823.47 1 Total TP Y 0.411 7 Tota l losse s gallon s 141.0 2

StanTrans , Inc . 4/24/9 8 2 6 T lP.4 7 

# Draf t SPECIA L CONDITIONS PERMI T NO . 167 7 DOCKE T 95-0358-AI

R EMISSION S STANDARD S 1 . Thi s permi

t cover s onl

y thos e source s o f

emission s liste

d i n th e attache d table entitle d "Emissio

n Source s Maximu mAllowabl

e Emissio n Rates' " an

d thos e source s ar

e limite d t o th e emissio

n limit s an d othe r condition s specifie d i n th e maximu

mallowabl

e emissio n rate s tabl e (MAERT) . 2 . Thes e facilitie s shal

l compl y wit h al l applicabl e requirement s of

Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y (EPA ) Regulation s on Standard s of Performanc e fo

r Ne w Stationar

y Source s promulgate

d fo r Storag e Vessel s fo

r Petroleu mLiquid s i

n Titl e 4 0 Cod

e o f Federa l Regulation s Par

t 6 0 (4 0 CF

R60) , Subparts A, K, Ka , an d Kb . (The permi t holde r wil l maintai n alist showin g applicabilit

y o f K , Ka , o r Kb. ) 3 . Whe n benzen e i s stored , thes e facilitie s shal l compl y wit h al l applicabl e requirements o f

EP A Regulation s on Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo

r Hazardou s Ai

r Pollutant s Promulgated fo

r Benzen e Emission s i

n 4 0 CF R61 , Subpart s A , J , Y , BB , an

d FF . DESIG N CONDITIONS 4 . Ne w flare s an d thos e incorporated i

n an y loadin g emission s abatemen

t syste mshal l b e designe

d an d operate d i

n accordanc e wit

h 4 0 CF R60.1 8 includin

g specification s o f

minimu mheating value o f

the wast e gas , maximu

mti p velocity , an

d pilot flam e monitoring . If

necessar y t o ensur e adequat e combustion , sufficien

t fiie l ga s shal l b e added t o mak

e th e gase s combustible . A

n infrare d monito r i s considered equivalen

t t o athermocoupl e fo

r flam e monitorin g purposes . 5 . Vapo

r Collection Systems A . A vacuum-assisted marin e loading vapo

r abatemen t syste mshal l b e installe

d an d operationa

l fo r loading of compound s wit

h tru e vapo

r pressure s of

0. 5 psi aor

higher . Contro l of

compound s wit

h tru e vapor pressure s les s tha

n 0. S psi arequired unde

r Specia l Condition s No . 1 3 shal

l b e implemente

d befor e compoun d i s received . Collected vapor s shal l b e route d t o aflare, carbo n adsorption system , or

othe r Texa s Natura

l Resourc e Conservation Commissio n (TNRCC ) approve

d abatemen

t device . Th

e collection efficienc

y shal l b e a t least 9 5 percent . Destructio n efficienc y shal l b e a t leas t 9 8 percen

t fo r flares . Carbon adsorptio n systems shal l have acontro l efficienc

y of a t leas t 9 5 percent . B . Emission s fromtan

k truck an d railroa d tan k ca r loading of compound s wit

h tru e vapor

pressure s o f

0. 5 psi ao r highe r shal l b e controlled . Th

e control of

tank s storag e an

d filling, an

d tan k truck , or railroa d tan k ca r loading of

compound s wit

h tru e vapo

r pressure s les s tha

n 0. 5 psi arequired unde

r Specia l Condition No . 1 3 shal

l b e installe

d an d operationa

l befor e th e compoun

d i s received . Collected vapor s shal l b e route d t o aflare, carbo n adsorption system , o r

othe r TNRCC approve

d abatemen

t device . Th

e collection efficienc

y shal l b e a t leas t 9 5 percent . Destructio n efficienc y shal l b e a t leas t 9 8 percen

t fo r flares. Carbon adsorption systems shal l have acontro l efficienc

y o f a t leas t 9 5 percent . C . A vapor

contro l syste

mshal l b e judge d a

t leas t 9 5 percen

t efficien t i f aretur n lin e i s directe d t o th e contro l syste

mor whe n vapor balanc e bac

k t o th e originating tan

k i s used . D . A vapor

collection syste

mshal l b e judge d 10

0 percen t efficien t i f a n approved vacuu

massis t o r "har d piped " syste

mi s used . Proo f

of "har d piped " connection s shal

l be : 1 . Record s certifyin

g receip t an d presentation , a

t each loading an

d unloadin g event , of

curren t DO T certification tha

t th e liquid carryin

g vesse l meet s apressur

e standar d of a t leas t 1 5 pound s pe

r squar e inc h gaug e (psig) ;

Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 ^rQ Pag e 1 o f 6

# Draf t 2 . Documentation shal

l b e presented t o th e Offic e o f Ai r Quality , Permit s Section (se e Specia l Condition No . 6 below ) tha t show s th e connection s t o th e vapo r contro l syste

mar e capable of vapor-tigh t operation a

t the proposed loading conditions . Thi s i s construed t o mea n an y combinatio n of dataindicatin

g lea k tigh t operatio n a

t aminimu mof 1 5 psig , particularl

y a t eac h connection . Thi s documentation shal l b e updated whe

n ne w o r modifie d loading spot s ar

e brough t unde r thi s permit . Approve

d "har d piped " loadin

g spot s shal

l b e identifie

d a s required control s "D " o n th e Required Control s Lis t (RCL ) o f thi s permit . 6 . Th e holde

r o f thi s permi t shal l forwar d t o th e staff

" of th e TNRCC mor

e detaile d engineerin

g datao n futur e abatemen t equipmen t a s i t become s available . Thi s informatio n shal l includ e (bu t i s no t limite d to) : final syste

m designs , collection efficiencies , destruction efficiencies , an d appropriat

e TNRC C table s (e.g. , Table s 8 fo

r a flare) . OPERATIONA

L LIMITATION S 7 . Loading emission s abatemen t requirements , b

y compoun

d storag e an

d loadin g scenario , ar

e show n i n Attachmen t I . Thes e restriction s shal

l b e implemente

d i n accordanc e wit

h the schedule s i

n Specia l Conditio n No . 5 . 8 . Storag e o f

benzene a t thes e facilitie s shal

l b e limite d t o no mor

e tha n 300,000 barrel s a

t an y tim e i n n o mor e tha n si x tanks . Throughpu

t of benzen e shal l b e limite d t o no mor

e tha n 1. 8 millio

n barrel s pe

r year . 9 . Th e holde

r o f thi s permi t shal l reduc e th e temperatur

e and/or vapor pressur e ofth e store d material , a s needed , t o maintai n avapor pressur e of les s tha n 0. 5 psi aa

t actua l storag e condition s i

n al l fixed-roof

tanks . Storag e o f compound s wit

h highe r vapor pressure s shal

l b e allowe

d i n afixed-roof

tan k i f al l workin g an

d breathing losse s ar e vented t o aflare, carbo

n adsorption system , o r

other TNRCC-approve

d abatemen

t device . 10 . Fo r compound s wit

h tru e vapo

r pressure s greate

r tha n or equa l t o 0. 5 psia , record s shal

l b e maintaine

d a t the termina l showin g star t an d stop time s fo

r loadin g operations . 11 . Tan k filling rate s shal

l no t excee d th e ES L off-sit

e impac t represented o

n th e mos t

recen t scenari o sheet . Loading rate s a

t th e loading spot s shal

l b e a s noted i

n th e Required Control s List (RCL) . Produc t

transfe r record s shal

l includ e loadin g rates . 12 . Onl y loading spot s approved i

n accordanc e wit

h Specia l Condition No . 1 3 ma

y b e used . Maximu

mES L off

sit e impacts specifie

d i n th e RC L shal l no t b e exceeded . New loadin

g spot s or increased pumpin

g rate s mus

t als o b e approved through th e proces s specifie d i n Specia l Condition No . 13 . SERVIC E AN D CHANG

E O F SERVIC E LIMITATION S 13 . New servic e an

d change o f

servic e i n tanks , a s wel

l as , direc t

transfe r operation s a

t thi s facilit

y shal l b e reviewed a s describe

d below . A. Baseline ful

l facilit y modelin g curren t a t th e date o f

ne w o r change o f service , an

d on recor d wit h th e TNRCC , shal

l b e used . Th

e modelin g shal l b e update d eac

h tim e a n emission s poin

t i s added or physicall y change d i n amanne r tha t result s i n a n increas e i

n o r chang e i n characte r o f emission s (i.e. , a permi t amendmen

t i s triggered o r

a n emission s poin

t i s adde d through registratio n o f

astandar d exemption) . Al

l off-propert

y healt h impac t determination s shal

l b e mad e based on th e lates t

TNRCC Toxicology an

d Ris k Assessmen

t (TARA ) Section Effect

s Screenin g Level s (ESL) . B . Compound s not

listed o n th e ACL : Th

e permi t holde r shal l submi t alette r change , includin

g (1 ) scenari o shee t (s ) listing tan

k number , compoun

d name , loadspots , control s required , (2 ) EP A Tanks 3 calculations , (3 ) ES L Checklist (s)-Short-Ter

m(equivalen

t t o thos e include

d i n th e permi

t representations) , (4 ) exceedanc e summar y (ies) , (5 ) modelin

g impacts summar

y (ies) , (6 ) ES L Summar

y (ies) , an d (7 ) Verificatio

n o f ES L assessment . Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 

# J^O Pa 

# S e 2 of 6

# Draf t C . Compounds : 1 . If th e worst-cas e impacts fromal l tanks an d loading losse s ar

e les s tha n or equa l t o lOxESL , the

n tan k produc t servic e ma

y b e change

d immediately . Th

e impact s chec

k datashal l b e attache d t o th e facility' s duplicat

e RC L (Specia l Conditio n No . 16 ) o n o r befor e servic e changes . Th

e permi t RC L shal l b e updated monthl

y b y alette r chang e containing th e items liste d i n subparagrap

h 1 3 (B ) above . a . For simultaneou s loading a

t tw o differen

t loadin g points , the maximu

moff-propert

y impact s shal l simpl y b e adde d an d compare d t o th e ESL . I f

les s tha n 2xESL , the

n submi t th e required information . I

f greater , the

n proceed t o su

b paragraph 13 © (2) . b . For simultaneou s loadin

g a t thre e or mor e differen t points , ful

l modelin g wil l b e done t o identif y th e maximu

moff-propert

y impacts . I f

les s tha n 2xESL , submi

t th e required information . If

greater , the

n proceed t o paragraph 13 © (2) . c . Th e combine

d loadin g rat e of asingl e compoun

d from asingl

e tan k through tw o o r

mor e loadin g spots , i f limite d t o th e lowes t

loadin g rate specifie

d o n th e approved scenari o sheet , shal l no t b e considered simultaneou s loading unde r Specia l Conditio n No . 10 . 2 . If th e worst-cas e impacts fromal l tan k an d loading losse s ar

e greate r tha n 2xES L but

les s tha n lOxESL , a n amendmen

t reques t shal l b e submitted . Th

e reques t shal l includ e th e item s liste d i

n subparagrap

h 13(B ) above . An

y permi t amendmen

t i n th e 2xES L t o lOxES L rang e ma y not excee d atota l o f 1 0 hour s o f

exceedance s pe

r year . 3 . Impact s greate

r tha n lOxES L ar

e unacceptable t o th e TNRCC . Additiona l abatemen

t or operationa l restriction s mus t

b e foun d t o creat e astorag e an

d loading scenario acceptabl e unde r (1 ) or (2 ) above , or

apermi t amendmen

t shal l b e filed fo

r avarianc e reques t

review . 14 . PIPING . VALVES . FLANGES . PUMPS . AN D COMPRESSOR

S I N VO C SERVICE . A. Thes e condition s shal

l not appl y (1 ) wher e th e VOC ha s a

n aggregat e partia l pressur e o r vapo r pressur e of les s tha n 0. 5 psi aa

t 100° F or a t maximu mproces s operatin g temperatur e i f les s tha n 100°F , o r

(2 ) wher e the . operating pressur

e i s a t leas t 5 kilopascal s (0.72 5 psi ) below ambien t pressure . Equipmen

t exclude d fromthi s condition shal

l b e identifie

d i n alis t t o b e mad e availabl e upo n request . B . Construction o f

ne w an d reworked piping , valves , an d pum p an d compresso

r systems shal

l confor mt o applicabl e ANSI , API , ASME , or

equivalen t codes . C . Ne w an d reworke d undergroun

d proces s pipeline s shal

l contai n no buried valve s suc

h tha t fugitiv e emissio n monitorin

g i s rendered impractical . D . T o th e exten

t tha t goo d engineerin

g practic e wil

l permit , ne

w an d reworked valve s an

d pipin g connection s shal

l b e s o located t o b e reasonabl y accessible fo

r lea k checkin g durin g plan t operation . Non-accessible valves , a s define d i n TNRCC 3 0 TA

C Chapte r 11 5 (Regulation V) , shal

l b e identifie

d i n alis t t o b e mad e availabl e upo n request . E . Ne w an d reworked pipin

g connection s shal

l b e welde d or flanged . Screwed connection s ar e permissible onl y o n pipin g smalle r tha n two-inch diameter . N o late r tha n th e nex t schedule d quarterl y monitoring period afte r initia l installation o

r replacement, al

l ne w or reworke d connection s shal l b e gas-teste d o r hydraulically-tested a

t no les s tha

n norma l operating pressur

e an d adjustment

s made , a s necessary , t o obtai n leak-free performance . Flange s shal l b e inspected b

y visual , audible , and/o

r olfactor y mean s a t leas t weekl y b y operating personne

l walk-through . Each open-ended valve o r

lin e shal l b e equippe

d wit h acap , blin

d flange, plug , o r

asecond valve . Excep t during sampling , th e secon

d valve shal

l b e closed . F . Accessibl

e valve s shal

l be monitore

d b y leak-checkin

g fo r fugitiv e emission s a

t leas t quarterly usin

g a n approved ga s analyzer . Sealless/leakles s valve s (including , but no t limite d to , bellow s an

d diaphrag m Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 Jj| Pag e 3 of 6P.5 0 

# Draf t valves ) an d relie f valve s equippe

d wit h aruptur e disc , apressur

e gaug e shal

l b e installed betwee

n th e relie f valve an d ruptur e dis c t o monito

r dis c integrity . Al

l leakin g disc s shal

l be replaced a

t th e earlies t opportunit y but n o late r tha n the nex t proces s shutdown . A n approved ga s analyze

r shal l confor mt o the requirements liste d i n Titl e 4 0 Cod

e of Federa l Regulation s Par

t 60.485(a ) - (b ) (4 0 CF

R60.48 5 [a] - [b]) . G . Except

a s ma y b e provided fo

r i n th e specia

l condition s of

thi s permit, al

l pum p an d compresso

r seal s shal l b e monitored wit

h a n approve d ga s analyze

r a t leas t quarterl y o r b e equipped wit

h ashaf t sealin g syste mtha t prevent s o r

detect s emission s o f

VOC fromth e seal . Sea

l systems designed an

d operate d t o preven t emissions , o r

seal s equippe

d wit h automati c sea

l failur e detection , an

d alar msystems nee

d not b e monitored . Sea

l systems tha

t preven t emission s ma

y includ e (bu t ar e no t limite d to ) dua l pum p seal s wit h barrie r flui d a t highe r pressur e tha n proces s pressur

e or seal s degassin

g t o ven t contro l systems kept

i n goo d working order . Submerge d pump s o r

sealles s pump s (including , but no t limited , t o diaphragm , canned , or magnetic drive

n pumps ) ma

y b e used t o satisf

y th e requirements of

thi s condition an

d nee d no t b e monitored . H . Damage

d or leakin g valves , flanges, compresso r seal , an d pum p seal s foun

d t o b e emitting VOC i

n exces s o f 10,00 0 ppm v or foun d b y visua l inspection t o b e leakin

g (e.g. , drippin

g liquids ) shal

l b e tagged an d replaced or

repaired . Ever

y reasonable effor

t shal l b e mad e t o repai r aleakin g component , a s specifie d i n thi s paragraph , withi

n 1 5 day s afte

r th e lea k i s found . If

th e repai r o f acomponen

t woul d requir e auni t shutdown , th e repai

r ma y b e delaye

d unti l th e nex t schedule d shutdown . Al

l leakin g component s whic

h cannot b e repaired unti

l aschedule

d shutdow n shal l b e identifie

d fo r suc h repai r b y tagging . Th

e TNRCC Executive Director , a t hi s discretion , ma

y requir e earl y uni t shutdown or

othe r appropriat e actio n based o

n th e numbe

r an d severit y o f tagge d leaks awaitin

g shutdown . I . The result s ofth e required fugitiv e monitoring an

d maintenance progra

mshal l b e mad e availabl e t o th e TNRCC Executive Directo r o r hi s designated representativ e upo n request . Record s shal

l indicat e appropriat e dates , tes t

methods , instrumen

t readings , repai

r results , an

d correctiv e action s taken fo r al l components . Record s o f

flange inspection s are no t

required unles s alea

k i s detected . J . Fugitive emissio

n monitorin

g required b

y TNRCC regulation V , applicabl e New Sourc e Perfonnanc e Standar d (NSPS) , Titl e 4 0 Cod

e o f Federa l Regulation s Par

t 60 (40CF R60) , or a n applicable Nationa

l Emissio n Standar d fo r Hazardou s Ai

r Pollutant s (NESHAPS ) 4 0 CF R6 1 ma y b e used i

n lie u of items F throug h I o f

thi s condition . K . Compliance wit

h th e requirements of

thi s condition doe s not

assur e compliance wit

h requirements of TNRCC Regulation V , NSPS , o r NESHAP S an

d doe s no t constitut e approva l o f alternativ e standard s fo r thes e regulations . 15 . STORAG

E AN D LOADIN

G O F VO C A . The contro l requirements specifie d i n paragraph s B- E of

thi s conditio

n shal l no t appl y (1 ) wher

e th e VOC ha s a

n aggregat

e partia l pressur e o f les s tha n 0. 5 psi aa

t the maximu

mexpected operating temperatur

e o r (2 ) t o storag e tank s smalle

r tha n 25,00 0 gallons . B . A n interna l floating dec

k o r "roo f or equivalen t contro l shal

l b e installe

d i n al l tanks . The floatin

g roo f shal l b e equipped wit

h on e of th e followin

g closur e device s betwee

n th e wal l ofth e storag e vesse

l an d th e edg e ofth e interna

l floating roof

: (1 ) aliquid-mounted seal , (2 ) tw o continuou s seal s mounte d one abov e th e other , o

r (3 ) amechanica

l sho e seal . Installation of

equivalen t contro l require s prior

revie w an d approva l b y th e Executive Director . C . A n open-top tan

k containin g afloating roo f

(externa l floatin g roo f tank ) whic h use s double sea

l o r secondar y sea l technology , shal

l b e a n approved contro l alternativ e t o a n intema l floating roo f

tank , provided th e primar

y sea l consist s of

eithe r amechanica

l sho e sea l o r aliquid-mounted seal , an

d th e secondar y sea l i s rim-mounted. A weathershield i s no t approvable a s asecondar

y sea l unles s specificall

y reviewed an

d determine

d t o b e vapor-tight . D . For an y tan k equipped wit

h afloating roof

, th e holde

r of thi s permi

t shal l follo w Titl e 4 0 Cod

e o f Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 Pag e 4 of6P.5 1 

# Draf t Federa l Regulation s Par

t 60.113 b (4 0 CF

R60.113b ) testing an

d procedure s t o verif

y sea l integrity . Additionally , th e permi

t holde r shal l follo w 4 0 CF R60.115 b reporting an

d recordkeeping requirements t o provid e record s ofth e date s seal s wer e inspected , sea

l integrity , an

d correctiv e action s taken . E . Th e floating roo f

desig n shal l incorporat

e sufficien t flotation t o confor

mt o th e requirements of

AP I Cod e 650 , o r a n equivalen

t degre e of

flotation, except

tha t a n interna l floatin g cove r nee d no t b e designe d t o mee t rainfal l suppor t requirement s an

d th e material s o f

constructio n ma

y b e stee l o r othe r materials . F . Uninsulate

d tan k exterio r surface s exposed t o th e su

n shal l b e white . G . Throughpu

t record s shal

l b e kep t fo r al l tank s an d loa d spot s t o assur

e complianc e wit

h Specia l Conditio n 1 6 entitled , Verificatio

n o f Continuin g Compliance . H . Emission s fo

r tank s an d loadin g operation s sha

d b e calculate

d using : (a ) AP-4 2 "Compilatio n o f Ai r Pollution Emissio

n Factors" ; an

d (b ) th e attache d edition of Texas Ai r Contro l Boar

d (now apar

t ofth e TNRCC ) mem

o entitled "Annua

l and shor t Ter mEmission s fromStorag e Tanks" . * I . Operatio n withou

t visibl e liquid leak s or

spill s shal

l b e maintaine

d a t al l loadin g and/o r unloadin g facilitie s regardles s o f

vapor pressure . Thi s doe s not

appl y t o momentar

y dripping associated wit

h the initia l connection or

disconnection o f

fittings. Sustaine

d drippin g from fittings during loadin g and/o r unloadin g operation s i s not

permitted . An

y liqui d spil l tha t occur s during loading and/o r unloadin g activitie s shal

l b e reported pursuan

t t o TNRCC Rule CFR101. 6 o r CFR101. 7 an

d shal l b e cleane

d u p immediatel y t o minimiz

e ai r emissions . 16 . VERIFICATION O

F CONTINUOUS COMPLIANC E A . Hourl

y and Annua

l Emissio n cap s shal l b e calculated a s follows : 1 . Tota l cumulativ

e tan k volatile organi c compound s (VOC) emission s shal l b e reviewed monthl

y t o ensur e th e annua

l allowabl e listed i n th e maximu

mallowabl

e emission s rate tabl e wil

l no t b e exceeded . Tan

k filling rate s shal

l no t excee d th e ES L offsit

e impac t represente d t o th e TNRCC a s required b y Specia l Conditio n 13 . Annua

l emissio n cap s wil l b e mad e availabl e fo r revie w whe n requested . 2 . Throughpu

t record s fo r al l loading operation s shal

l b e maintaine

d t o ensur e VOC emissio

n rate s do not excee d th e maximu

mES L of f sit e impac t represented t o th e TNRCC a s required b y Specia l Condition 13 . R Carbon Adsorption Syste mSpecia l Conditions : 1. Al l Carbo n Adsorption Systems required b y Specia l Conditio n 13 , or 4 0 CF R60 , wil l consis t of a minimu mof tw o carbo n bed s i n series . 2. Tanks or

loadin g systems dedicated t o asingl e compoun

d wil l be checked aminimu

mo f onc e a quarte r wit h aportable Organic Vapor Analyze r durin g loadin g operations . A

n OV A reading o f 10 0 ppm v o r greater , a t apoin t betwee n th e canisters , shal

l indicat e breakthrough has occurred . Th e first caniste r shal l b e disposed of

i n a n approved manner

, an d th e secon

d caniste r shal l replac e th e first. A ne

w caniste r shal l b e added t o th e en

d ofth e series . Record s shal l b e kept of caniste r lif e an d replacement . 3. A minimu

mof three (3 ) carbon canister s i n serie s shal

l b e installe

d whe n mor e tha n thre e (3 ) compound s ar

e vente d directl y t o acarbon adsorption syste ma t th e sam e time . 17 . RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS A . A duplicat

e ofth e RCL , or

it s equivalent , shal

l b e kep t availabl e a t th e facility . It

shal l b e organized b

y tank , showin

g th e compoun

d currentl y approved t o b e i

n tha t tank , th e loading spot s currentl y approved fo r use , an d th e associated contro l requirements fo r loadin g operations . Thes e record s wil l b e annotated Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 s^ J Pag e 5 of 6 

# J3P.5 2 

# Draf t wit h th e dat e th e tank/spot

scenari o wa s added or

las t changed , an

d wil l referenc e th e documen

t used to obtai n TNRCC approva

l (permi t amendment, standar

d exemptio

n registration , an

d lette r change) . B . StanTran s i s t o notif

y th e TNRCC how an

y change s i

n permi t emission s wil

l affec t th e Confidentia

l Section ofth e permi

t application . C . StanTran s i s t o determin e i f an y proposed emissio

n increase s associated wit

h th e addition or

chang e of chemical s wil

l increas e VO

C o r nitroge n oxide s b

y five ton s pe

r yea r (tpy ) o r more . I f afive tpy increase s i n actua l emission s i s noted , StanTran s i s t o submi t plantwid e modelin g t o th e TNRC C prior

to initiating th e change . Emissio n Poin t Numbers (EPNs ) listin

g cumulativ

e annua l emission s b

y facilit y typ e (i.e. , al

l tank s together , al

l tan k far mloading , al

l doc k loading ) shal

l b e considered a s th e pertinen t EP N fo r purpose s of

netting . 18 . DISCLAIME

R Issuanc e o f

thi s permi

t doe s no t assur e complianc e wit

h o r constitut e approva l o f marin e vapor contro l system s pursuan

t t o requirements ofth e United State s (U.S. ) Coas t Guar d whic h ma y have jurisdictio n ove

r th e desig n an

d operatio n o f

suc h systems . The holde

r o f thi s permi

t i s advise d t o contrac t

th e U.S . Coas t Guar d regarding thi s matter . 19 . AMPLIFICATIO

N O F SPECIA L AN D GENERA

L CONDITIONS A . Genera

l Condition No . 9 : Th

e ai r pollution contro l equipmen t i s define d a s tha t required b

y th e permi

t o r applicable Federa

l an d Texa s rule s an

d regulations . B . Specia

l Condition No . 14E : Secon d sentenc e mean s screwe

d connection s ar

e permissible on pipin

g tw o inche s an d smalle r i n diameter . C . Specia

l Condition s No . 15 : 1 . 15A : 87.5 ° F a s show

n on Tanks 3. 0 Program , Galveston , Texas , meteorologica l data . 2 . 15D : Interna

l floating roo f

tank s shal

l b e inspected visuall

y i n accordanc e wit

h 4 0 CF R60 , paragraph 113b . 3 . 151 : Equipmen

t fugitive s ar

e not include d i n th e required calculations .

Rev . 1 2/06/9 8 — ' • Pag e 6 o f 6 

# 54 -P.5 3



### ATTACHMEN

T 4



# 65P.5 4



# STANTRANS , INC . 

# AdU U 1 \\i

P.O . Bo x 360 8 "^ ' f 20 1 Doc k

Roa d Texa s City . T X 77592-3608 (409) 948-356 1 Aumis t1 2 199 8 <409 > •«-««« • (FAX ) Augus tiz , iw o mike_holdman@8t8«rvice8.ne t(EMAIL ) Mr . Ken tC . Hustved t Grou p Leade r Wast e an d Chemical Proces s Grou p Unite d State s Environmental Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park * N C 2771 1 Dear Mr . Hustvedt : W e ar e i n receipt

o f you r sit e visi t report date d Jul y 10,199 8 an d generall y speaking , i t wa s ver y accurate . On e are athat

require s furthe

r clarificatio n i s th e tan k

truck s sectio n o n pag e 6 . Th e repor t state s tha t tan k truck s ar e to p loade d a t

th e S T Servic e facility . W e d o top-loa d afe w tan k truck s wit h product s that

d o no t requir e vapo r

control . Al l product s requirin g vapo r contro l ar e botto mloade d wid i di e to p connection s use d for vapo r contro l an d high-leve l alarms/overfil l protectio n devices . Th e tan k truc k sectio n o n pag e 6 als o state s that S T Service s pressur e test s tan k truck s tha t

handl e Acrylate s for

3 days . Acrylat e tan k

truck s ar e pressure d u p afte r bein g loade d an d al l threade d connection s ar e checke d an d th e tan k truc k i s released i f

n o vapor s ar e detected . W e pressur e tes t tan k car s o f Ethy l Acrylat e an d Memy l Acrylat e for thre e day s afte

r the y ar e loaded . Th e report

als o state s o n pag e 9 unde r VT J Actio n Item s that

S T Service s agree d t o provid e infonnatio n abou t

wastewater

generatio n rate s an d source s o f wastewate r

generation , HA P conten t

o f wastewate r

an d th e incomin g an d outgoin g HAP concentration s o f wastewater . Th e wastewate r quantitie s an d concentration s o f HA P i n th e wastewater

ar e movin g target s an d records o f both ar e no t kept . Mos t

o f our wastewater

i s stor mwate r an d wate r

fromhydrostati c testin g o f tanks , pipeline s an d hoses . W e d o no t

hav e any processe s tha t

generat e wastewater

tha t woul d contai n an y HAP's . Al l wastewate r

tha t woul d possibl y contai n copiou s amount s o f HAP' s i s drumme d an d dispose d o f a s hazardou s waste . I f yo u hav e an y question s regardin g dii s matter , pleas e contac t m e a t th e abov e address , o r

b y callin g (409)948-3561 . Sincerely ,
Michae l D . Holdma

n Directo r o f Operation s Cc : Kyl e Mullins , Mar k A . Saxto n



### ISO 9002 Certified 

# 5<oP.5 5



### ATTACHMENT S



# 5 ?SECTIO N 3 - E FACILITY FUGITIV

E EQUIPMEN T INFORMATIO N FO RADDED AN D EXISTIN G FACILITIE S INRC C AI

RPROGRA

M ACCOUN

T NUMBER : GBOOOS

J IIN : -Hlf

L FACILITY NAME : F S3 ]U ve s

1 METHODOLOG Y USED :



### CtiMPttNEN

T ! 1 VALVES
- GAS/VAPO R

LIGHT LIQUID/LIGH

T OI L HEAV Y LIQUID/HEAV

Y OI L WATER/LIGH

T OI L MIXTUR

E J PUMPS
- GAS/VAPO R

LIGHT LIQUID/LIGH

T OI L HEAV Y LIQUID/HEAV

Y OI L WATER/LIGH

T OI L MIXTUR

E *FLANGES
- GAS/VAPOR

LIGH T LIQUID/LIGH

T OI L HEAVY LIQUID/HEAV

Y OI L WATER/LIGH

T OI L MIXTUR

E 1 RELIEF VALVE S

• rOMI'RFWOR S PROCES S FUGITIV E EMISSION S ESTIMATIO N METHODOLOG Y COMPONEN T COUN T 

### 322 5



### 15 9

728 5 TOTA L HR S IN SERVICE * 876 0

876 0

876 0 INSPECTIO N PROGRA M

' I lour , ihoul d h e 876 0 unlc » th e line i hiv e bee n purge d IIIKCC0137 J lllev . 10/24/96 ) 

# •5 *

c nChemica l Manufacturin g Fugitive s SOCM I withou t ethylene ; TNRC C derive d Componen t Valve s Pump s Flange s Compressor s Relie f Valve s Ope n Line s Samplin g Connection s Ga s

Ligh t Liq . Heav y Liq . Ligh t Liq . Heav y Liq . Ga s Ligh t Liq . Heav y Liq . Coun t 0

322 5 0 15 9 0 0 728 5 0 0 0 0 2 7 Facto r Ibs/h r comp .

0.008 9 0.003 5 0.000 7 0.038 6 0.016 1 0.002 9 0.000 5 7.00E-0 5 0.502 7 0.229 3 0.00 4 0.03 3 Hours/yea r

876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 876 0 % Reduc .

0 7 5 0 7 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 5 7 5 7 5 Lbs/Yea r 0 24.719.6 3

0 13,440.9 1 0 0 22,335.8 1

0 0 0 0 1.951.2 9 Tons/Yea r

0.00 0 12.36 0 0.00 0 6.72 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 11.16 8 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.97 6 |Tolal s 31.2238 | 62.447.6 3 Note : Withou t ethylen e i s define d a s < 11 % ethylen e i n th e stream .

4/21/9 7
U i