alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                             U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                        1,616
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,834
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     253
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        4,952
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          4,953
<LOANS>                                      27,859
<ALLOWANCE>                                     187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               37,313
<DEPOSITS>                                   28,795
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             226
<LONG-TERM>                                     300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                      4,910
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               37,313
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 576
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                85
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 32
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                693
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              356
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           337
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 144
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       95
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                     95
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.80
<LOANS-NON>                                     299
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                187
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               187
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         187
        


</TABLE>
ORIX (LOGO)

February 18, 2000

PricewaterhouseCoopers
2001 Ross Avenue
Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75201-2997

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, ORIX Real Estate Capital Markets
("ORECM"),  which was doing business as Banc One Mortgage Capital  Markets,  LLC
until July 12,  1999,  has complied in all  material  respects  with the minimum
servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers  Association of America's
Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") (except,  for
commercial loan and multifamily loan servicing,  minimum servicing standards V.4
and VI. 1., which the MBA has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing.) As
of and for this same period,  ORECM had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amount of $25 million.

The Company has  established  and maintains  custodial  accounts with  federally
insured  depository  institutions  in accordance  with the servicing  agreements
requirement for Eligible Accounts. Custodial balances are invested in accordance
with the servicing agreements requirement for Permitted  Investments.  Permitted
Investments  may include  commercial  paper and money  market  mutual funds with
non-federally  insured  financial  institutions  which meet the  minimum  rating
requirements specified by the applicable servicing agreement.



Edgar L. Smith, II
Chief Operating Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


Addendum A to Employment Agreement
between Targeted Medical Pharma and Amir Blachman dated January 31, 2012


 


 


		1.	Effective March 5, 2012, salary is increased to $210,000 per year. $180,000 of this salary will be paid at the rate of $180,000
and $30,000 of this salary will accrue until any one of the following milestones are reached:



 


		a.	The Company’s CEO determines that cash flow is sufficient to support the payout of accrued salary;



 


		b.	The Company closes any form of financing that generates at least $3 million in proceeds, except for loans to the company by
its principals.



 


		c.	The Company receives notification from the SEC that ths S-1 registration is approved.



 


		d.	The Company’s tax liabilities through December 31, 2011 are eliminated.



 


		2.	Effective April 15, 2012 a bonus of $50,000 is accrued to be paid out upon the occurrence of any on of the milestones listed
in sections 1a through 1d of this Addendum.



 


		3.	This Addendum will be added to the previously signed Employee Agreement between Targeted Medical Pharma and Amir Blachman dated
January 31, 2012.



 


	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ William E. Shell	 	4/25/2012
	 	 	William E. Shell, MD
Chief Executive Officer	 	Date
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Amir Blachman	 	4/25/2012
	 	 	Amir Blachman

VP Strategy and Operations	 	Date
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RAE Systems Inc.;
    (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert I. ChenRobert I. Chen President,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-15-00606-CR

EX PARTE ALFONSO SANTANA VILLA, Appellant

Appeal from the 174th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 752734-A).

TO THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 23rd day of July, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on June 8, 2015. After inspecting the record of 

the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that there is no reversible 

error in the judgment. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and

ORDERED that the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered July 23, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack 

and Justices Higley and Massengale.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

October 2, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Pediatric Centers of Excellence in Nephrology.                    

*Date:*                         April 11, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Teleconference).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Rushing, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7345, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8895,                         *rushingp@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 18, 2022. 

David W. Freeman, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-04001 Filed 2-24-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Attachment D.1

Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA and Federal Government Labor Costs

This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0766 and is 

part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement

NAICS: 999100 

Federal Executive Branch

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate1= W $55.64 $33.23 $20.06 

Benefits Percentage2Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.26 $14.49 $8.75 

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = 

W(1+Lb)

$79.90 $47.72 $28.81 

Overhead Percentage3Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $39.95 $23.86 $14.40 

Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH $119.85 $71.58 $43.21 

= W + B + OH 

1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm May 2010 data

 NAICS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch

 Standard Occupational Codes: 

 Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations 

 Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations 

 Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations 

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. 

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth 

Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the 

range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1  Press Release



PRESS RELEASE
January 28, 2000

                              For further information contact:
                              David M. Bradley
                              Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                              North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                              825 Central Avenue
                              Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                              515-576-7531

                    NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. ANNOUNCES
                            STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

Fort Dodge, Iowa, January 28, 2000 - North Central Bancshares, Inc. (Nasdaq:
"FFFD") (the "Company"), the holding company for First Federal Savings Bank of
Iowa, announced that it will commence a stock repurchase program.  The program
authorizes the Company to repurchase up to 150,000 shares of its outstanding
shares of common stock during the next twelve months.  The repurchases will be
made from time to time, in open market transactions, at the discretion of
management.

This new program will commence at the completion of the Company's current
repurchase program which began on November 4, 1999.

North Central Bancshares, Inc., with over $367 million in assets, is the holding
company for First Federal Savings Bank of Iowa, a federally chartered stock
savings bank.  First Federal is a community-oriented institution serving Iowa
through 8 full service locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada, Ames, Burlington, Mt.
Pleasant, and Perry, Iowa.  First Federal's deposits are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
14298

#### FULP v. POWELL *ET AL.*

(185 S. E., 729)

January, 1936.

*315
      *Mr. Norbert A. Theodore,*for appellant,

*Messrs. F. Uhrlich Thomson*and *J. B.*¿1 *Lyles,*for respondents,

*316May 15, 1936.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This action by J. D. Fulp, as administrator of the South Carolina Emergency Relief Administration, as plaintiff, against the defendants, E. R. Powell, Jr., and Henry W. Anderson, as Receivers of the Seaboard Air Rine Railway, was commenced in the Richland County Court by service of summons and complaint, December 17, 1935. The purpose of the action is 'to recover judgment against the defendants in the sum of $125.00 for the alleged wrongful killing of a cow, owned, according to the allegations of the complaint, by the plaintiff as administrator of the South Carolina Emergency Relief Administration. To this complaint the defendants filed a demurrer, which demurrer was, in due course, heard by his Honor, A. W. Holman, Judge of the said Court of Richland County. Upon due consideration of the demurrer, after hearing argument thereon by counsel representing the parties hereto, his Plonor, Judge Holman, sustained the demurrer, and from said order the plaintiff has duly appealed to this Court.

Under the allegations of the complaint it is our opinion that the trial Judge properly sustained the demurrer. This question comes more properly within the province of the legislative branch of the government than in the judicial.

It is therefore the judgment of this Court that the exceptions be, and are hereby, overruled, and the order and judgment appealed from affirmed.

*317Mr. Chiee Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fisi-iburne concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chronimed Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry F. Blissenbach,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:


         1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

February 6, 2003

                                              /s/ HENRY F. BLISSENBACH
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Henry F. Blissenbach
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chairman of the Board of Directors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,646
<SECURITIES>                                     6,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   273
<PP&E>                                           4,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,959
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,923
<OTHER-SE>                                    (98,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,123
<SALES>                                          2,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,161
<CGS>                                            1,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,923)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rallen Ryan MARSHALL, also known as Cat, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-60711 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 9, 2017

*280Susan Spears Bradley, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Gregory Scott Park, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, for Defendant-Appellant

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Rallen Ryan Marshall appeals the 48-month above-guidelines sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He argues that the sentence is substantively unreasonable based upon the mitigation arguments that he raised during the revocation hearing. With respect to his supervised release violation of traveling outside the district without permission, he contends that he left the district because he was being threatened by his co-defendants and gang members. With respect to his supervised release violation of being charged with cruelty to a juvenile, he argues that, while he committed the offense against his girlfriend’s four-year-old son, he does not remember committing the offense. He also contends that he took care of his girlfriend’s children like they were his own children and that he has no history of violence or child abuse.

We review Marshall’s substantive reasonableness challenge under the “plainly unreasonable” standard. *See United States v.*Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011). Marshall’s mitigation arguments, which were considered by the district court, essentially amount to a disagreement with the district court’s balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, which we will not reweigh. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed,2d 445 (2007); *United States v. Warren,*720 F.3d 321, 332 & n.2 (5th Cir. 2013). Moreover, we have “routinely upheld revocation sentences exceeding the recommended range, even where the sentence is the statutory maximum.” *See Warren,*720 F.3d at 332 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); *see also United States v. Kippers,*685 F.3d 491, 500-01 (5th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.