alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BY: 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

WYLMINA E. HETTINGA, AN 

INDIVIDUAL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

ALAN T. NAHOUM, INC., A NEW 

YORK CORPORATION, 

Respondent. 

No. 83940 

FILED 

JAN 1 3 2022 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This pro se appeal was docketed on December 20, 2021, without 

payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this 

court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or 

demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days. The notice advised 

that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, 

appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's 

notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Wylmina E. Ilettinga 

Holley Driggs/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2 2 - 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

(0) 1947 algito
Mark McKinnon

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse
McLean, VA 22102

- 4832

United States

email: mark.mckinnon@dentons.com

T 703.336.8808

F 703.336.8750 Salans FMC SNR

Denton
McKenna Long

dentons.com

May 13, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 12588 granted to Pacific Gas and Electric (Docket No.

FAA

– 2015

– 0708 )

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this o ffice represents Pacific Gas and Electric regarding the above

referenced Petition for Exemption, which was granted on A ugust 25, 2015

. Pacific Gas and

Electric hereby requests an amendment to its Exemption to add any UAS that has been previously approved by the Secretary and are found on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), set forth at Docket No. FAA

- 2007

- 3330. Pacific Gas and Electric respe ctfully submits that this Petition for Exemption qualifies for expedited approval, as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has previously issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented herein.

I. De scription of Proposed Operations

Pacific Gas and Electric does not seek any changes to the terms and conditions of its operations as set forth in Exemption No

. 12588

.

I I

. The Proposed UAS Operations Meet the Requirements of Section 333 of the Reform

Act

The FAA has already ruled that the listed aircraft meet the criteria set forth in Section 333

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. Accordingly, all of the requirements to

ope r ate these vehicles been satisfied and the petiti on is suitable for a summary grant. See

, Exemption No. 11 400C to Contend, LLC, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0155

III. The Requested Amendment is in the Public Interest

The above

- listed UAS offer substantial safet y benefits for aerial data collection o ver conventional operations using helicopters or fixed wing aircraft. In addition, the FAA has

determined that permitting the use of aircraft listed at Docket N o. FAA

- 2007

- 3330 serves the public interest by reducing the administrative burden on the FAA and i mprov ing operator
flexi bility

, while also maintaining an a ppropriate level of safety.May 13, 2016 Page 2 Salans FMC SNR Dento n McKenna Long

dentons.com

If you have any questions regarding this amendment, or require any additional information to process this Petition, please do not hesitate to con tact us.

Very Truly Yours,

Mark E. McKinnon Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

      ( print page 9390)    
The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on Strategy hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, February 23, 2022, from 4:00-5:00 p.m. EST.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda is: Committee Chair's remarks; Update on NSF's FY 2022 and FY 2023 budgets.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair, 703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at the National Science Board website at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-03737 Filed 2-16-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  DERIVED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
            
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000      
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            87
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,101
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   23,949
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        23,766
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           4,739
<LOANS>                                       29,568
<ALLOWANCE>                                      274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                61,478
<DEPOSITS>                                    30,681
<SHORT-TERM>                                  14,050
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              540
<LONG-TERM>                                    1,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         106
<OTHER-SE>                                    14,301
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                61,478
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  595
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                483
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,089
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               612
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            477
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      6
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  243
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                       77
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 276
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      6
<RECOVERIES>                                       4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                274
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             274
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.8




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Properties Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bryan
K. Davis, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









By:
            /s/ Bryan K.
      Davis





Bryan K.
Davis


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




March 12,
2010
SecondAmendment to Agreement toLicense by and between NAI and Compound Solutions



 Exhibit 10.34 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 AGREEMENT TO LICENSE 

This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement to License by and between Natural Alternatives
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“NAI”), and Compound Solutions, Inc., a California corporation (“CSI”), dated effective as of July 1, 2011, as amend by that certain First Amendment to Agreement to License
effective as of January 6, 2012 (“Agreement”), is made and entered into effective as of March 19, 2012 (“Effective Date”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings given them in the
Agreement. 
 1. The term “CSI,” as used in the Agreement, including in each amendment to the
Agreement, is revised to refer to Compound Solutions, Inc., together with its successors, transferees and assigns. 
 2. Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the Schedule 1 attached hereto. 
 3. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be
deemed an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery by facsimile or other electronic means of an executed counterpart hereof shall have the same force and effect as delivery of an originally executed
counterpart hereof. 
 [Signatures on following page.] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
Effective Date. 
  

	
	NAI
	
	Natural Alternatives International, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation
	
	 /s/ Kenneth E. Wolf

	Kenneth E. Wolf, Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officer
	
	CSI
	
	Compound Solutions, Inc.,
a California corporation
	
	 /Matthew Titlow

	Matthew Titlow, Chief Executive Officer
Dismiss and Opinion Filed August 3, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 23

- 00707

- CV

JAMES SMITH , Appellant

V.

DANIEL S. BISHOP AND SUSAN P. BISHOP, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 109091

- 86

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Reichek, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Reichek

B y motion filed July 28, 2023, appellant inf orms the Court the parties have

settled their dispute and asks we d ismiss the appeal with prejudic e. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion, deny as moot a pending motion to extend time

to file notice of appeal, and dismiss the appeal with p rejudice. See id.

230707f.p05 /Amanda L. Reichek/ /
AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JAMES SMITH, Appellant

No. 05

- 23

- 00707

- CV V.

DANIEL S. BISHOP AND SUSAN P. BISHOP, Appellees On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court, Kaufman County,
Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 109091

- 86. Opinion delivered by Justice Reichek, Justices Partida

- Kipness and Miskel participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal with prejudice

.

Subject to any agreement among the parties, w e ORDER that appellees Daniel S. Bishop and Susan P. Bishop recover their costs , if any, of this appeal from appellant James Smith.

Judgment entered this 3 rd day of August 2023.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I Kevin McCarthy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the Report) do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o (d)) and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Kevin McCarthy                   
|                      |  | Kevin McCarthy                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Leonardo CHAVEZ-SIFUENTES, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40238 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Leonardo Chavez-Sifuentes, Pro Se

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leonardo Chavez-Sifuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chavez-Sifuentes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7985

SALRAMON GONZALES, a/k/a Alex Ramirez,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ENNIS OATES,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:12-hc-02045-D)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salramon Gonzales, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Salramon Gonzales seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gonzales has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate 

of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Waymon Keith EASON, Jr., also known as Waymon Keith Eason, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-50644 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 18, 2017

*256Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for

Waymon Keith Eason, Jr., Pro Se

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Waymon Keith Eason, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Eason has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                               [DIXON HUGHES LOGO]



             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-83875) of Wake Forest Bancshares, Inc. of our report
dated December 21, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial condition of
Wake Forest Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wake Forest Bancshares, Inc., included herein.

/s/ Dixon Hughes PLLC

Raleigh, North Carolina
December 21, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his capacity as an officer of Liberate Technologies, that this annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Liberate Technologies.

|Date: September 16, 2003 |  | /s/DAVID LOCKWOODDavid Lockwood Chief Executive Officer                               
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 16, 2003 |  | /s/GREGORY S. WOODGregory S. Wood Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit





 



[NAME]
MARCH 15, 2018
PERFORMANCE UNITS  
AWARD LETTER
The Compensation and Management Succession Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has awarded you:
_______ Performance Units 
Award Period: January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2020 
Grant Date: March 15, 2018
These Performance Units were awarded pursuant to the Protective Life Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and are subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2018 Performance Units Award Provisions (“Provisions”), as set forth in Appendix A to this Award Letter, and the Plan. The Plan and the Provisions contain terms and conditions regarding the payment of these Performance Units, termination of employment, tax withholding, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance and other matters, and I encourage you to read the Provisions carefully.
Please retain these documents in your personal records.
                        
Richard J. Bielen
President and Chief Executive Officer of Protective Life Corporation
#### In the Matter of George Goeb, Sr., Deceased. Mary G. Prisa et al., Appellants; George Goeb, Jr., Respondent.

Submitted May 20, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*895
      *Edward Devlin*for Mary G. Prina, appellant.

*Murray Kurman*and *Benjamin Schaffer*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable out of the estate; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.