alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                         6,198
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  86,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    95,934
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,664
<PP&E>                                         204,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                 71,160
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,395
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       121
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,671
<SALES>                                        127,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,147
<CGS>                                          117,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (526)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (110)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (524)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.05)
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-NRNHL-33363; PPWOCRAD10, PUC00RP14.R50000]


Notice of Public Meeting of the Cold War Advisory Committee; 
Cancellation

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service gives notice that the Cold War 
Advisory Committee virtual meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 24, 
2022, has been cancelled. The notice is in the Federal Register of 
Friday, November 19, 2021, in FR Doc. 2021-25299, in the first and 
second columns of page 64956.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa P. Davidson, Ph.D., Program 
Manager, National Historic Landmarks Program, National Park Service, 
telephone at (202) 354-2179, or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed81849e8cb2898c9b84899e8283ad839d9ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ee2e7fdefd1eaeff8e7eafde1e0cee0fefda0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. appendix 2

Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03931 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY-ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Ivanovick, Chief Financial Officer of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB/A of RecycleNet and subsidiaries.



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





|March 14, 2005 | /s/   Rick Ivanovick   
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Rick Ivanovick         
|               | Chief Financial Officer

---

| | 
| |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          28,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    308,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               407,407
<PP&E>                                         291,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 892,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,255,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,356
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,509,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   892,197
<SALES>                                          4,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,288
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,172,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,664
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,260,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,260,060)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### * Benjamin Runnells *versus*Robert Fletcher.

Where an officer, in settling an execution, demanded and received of the debtor a sum beyond the amount of his legal fees, as compensation for trouble he had had at a former time, from the debtor’s resisting the officer, for which he had been indicted and convicted, — it was held not to be extortion, within the statute of 1795, c. 44, § 6.

This was an action of debt on the statute of 1795, c. 44, § 6, to recover of the defendant, a deputy sheriff of the county of *Kennebeclc,*the sum of 30 dollars, for wilfully and corruptly demanding and receiving of the plaintiff a greater fee than by the said statute is allowed, for the service of an execution against him, in favor of one *Edward Swan,*for the sum of 20 dollars 16 cents.

On trial, before *Thatcher,*J., it appeared that the sum of 9 dollars 59 cents was received by the defendant, in addition to the amount of the execution — which exceeded the legal fees thereon by the sum of 8 dollars 11 cents.

At the time of the settlement of the said execution, the defendant had also another execution against the plaintiff, in favor of *J. Getchell;*and his fees on both were calculated to be 3 dollars 59 cents. But he demanded another sum of 6 dollars, for extra trouble he had suffered in relation to the first-mentioned execution. The plaintiff objected to this demand, as too much ; but on *Fletcher’s*refusing to settle upon other terms, the plaintiff paid him a part in money, and gave his note for the balance — which note had been paid before the commencement of the present action.

The trouble for which the defendant claimed indemnity, was what he had suffered by jhe resistance of *Runnells,*in a former attempt to serve the execution ; and for which he had been indicted and convicted.

A verdict was returned for the plaintiff, under instructions from the judge, that if the jury were satisfied that the defendant made use of the execution, in any manner, to create an apprehension and fear in the mind of *Runnells*that, if he did not pay the said sum, he would be committed to jail, it was extortion, and the plaintiff would be entitled to a verdict.

*Williams*for the plaintiff.

*Warren*for the defendant.

*Curia.*

To subject an officer to the penalty prescribed by the statute, it must be proved that the sum, alleged to * have been extorted, was demanded as a fee for some official duty. He must have wilfully and corruptly demanded and received other or greater fees than the law allows.

*467By the facts reported in this case, if any offence has been committed, it is not against the statute on which the action is brought, but must be extortion at common law. (a) The excess demanded was not as and for fees of service, but as a compensation for labor and trouble attending a supposed injury which happened before. The action cannot, therefore, be maintained upon these facts. (b)

*New trial granted.*

(a)

*Commonwealth*vs. *Bayley,*7 *Pick.*279.

(b)

*Dunlop*vs. *Curtis,*10 *Mass. Rep.*210. — *Shattuck*vs. Wood, 1 *Pick.*171. — *Commonwealth*vs. *Shed,*1 *Mass. Rep.*227.
dxpe_0511128k-ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1







Amendment One to David Little Equity Incentive Program







On May 11, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") amended an equity incentive program under which David R. Little can earn an award of up to $700,000 of common stock under the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan each year for three years. Each award vests in one third increments over three years.  The amendment increased the value of the maximum annual award from $500,000 to $700,000.







The shares will be awarded on March 31 of each year based upon the closing price on March 31.  The value of each award will be determined based upon the growth in sales and net income for the preceding fiscal year.  If sales and net income each increase by 20% or more for the preceding fiscal year, the value of the award will be $700,000.  Growth of less than 10% in sales and net income will result in an award of zero.  Growth of between 10% and 20% will result in an award between zero and $700,000.  The first award under this amended three year program will be issued on March 31, 2013.  The grid to calculate the amount of each award follows:








	  	
Sales Growth Percentage


	
Net Income Growth

	
%

	
< 10

	
10 - 12

	
>12 – 14

	
>14 - 16

	
>16 - 18

	
>18 – 20

	
>20


	
<10

	
0

	
0

	
10

	
10

	
15

	
15

	
20


	
10 – 12

	
0

	
30

	
35

	
40

	
45

	
50

	
55


	
>12 – 14

	
10

	
35

	
40

	
45

	
50

	
60

	
70


	
>14 – 16

	
20

	
40

	
45

	
50

	
60

	
70

	
80


	
>16 – 18

	
25

	
45

	
50

	
60

	
70

	
80

	
90


	
>18 – 20

	
25

	
45

	
55

	
70

	
80

	
90

	
95


	
>20

	
25

	
45

	
60

	
80

	
90

	
95

	
100

















EXECUTED effective the 11th day of May, 2012.







DXP ENTERPRISES, INC.







By:           /s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell







Title:           Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-956]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 SUMMARY: Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Inc. has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 25, 2022. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before April 25, 2022.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on November 5, 2021, Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Inc., 25 Patton Road, Devens, Massachusetts 01434, applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance
Drug 
                             code
ScheduleAmphetamine
1100
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IINabilone
7379
IIHydrocodone
9193
IILevorphanol
9220
IIThebaine
9333
IIAlfentanil
9737
IIRemifentanil
9739
IISufentanil
9740
II
 The company plans to support its other manufacturing facilities located in West Deptford, New Jersey and Conshohocken, Pennsylvania with manufacturing and analytical testing. In reference to drug code 9333 as bulk, the company plans to manufacture a Thebaine derivative for distribution to its customers. No other activities for these drug codes are authorized for this registration. Matthew J. Strait, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2022-03901 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
• •• • ' if iirjiu\ \ \j r 

NS°OR WION Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

-! v^ PERAIION S Federal Aviation Administration 

-•'H ^^3 N P !:U2 (..JJi , 

In the matter of 

M & R HELICOPTER 

Docket No. CPlOSOOOll 

FAA Case No. 2009SO950434 

Chief Judge Ronnie A. Yoder 

COMPLAINANT'S OPPOSITION TO 

M&R HELICOPTER'S MOTION FOR DEPOSITION OF CYNTHIA DOMINIK 

AT GALLAGHER REPORTING IN ALLENTOWN, PA 

Complainant files this Opposition to Respondent M& R Helicopters' 

Motion To Depose Cynthia Dominik at Gallaher Reporting, Allentown, PA. 

Ms. Dominik is a supervising attomey in this matter and a manager in the FAA, Office of 

Chief Counsel, Enforcement Division. Given her role as counsel. Respondent's motion 

to depose Ms. Dominik is inappropriate. Complainant does not agree to make 

Ms. Dominik available for deposition and opposes Respondent's request. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

OMJ^PC^ Q^k:^ 

ra Ponto 

Attomey 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202)267-9863 

Facsimile: (202)267-5106 

Date: January 31,2011 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt, a copy of Complainant's Opposition to Respondent M& R 

Helicopters'Motion To Depose Cynthia Dominik at Gallaher Reporting, Allentown. PA 

In the Matter ofM& R Helicopters, Docket No. CPlOSOOOllO, FAA Case no. 

2009SO950434, addressed to: 

Dr. Michael B. Selig 

President 

M & R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Westgate Dr., Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document to: 

The Honorable Rormie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Dated: January 31, 2011
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002 of Crazy Woman Creek Bancorp Incorporated (the "Company") as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"report"),  we, Gary J. Havens,  President and Chief Executive Officer, and John
B. Snyder, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/Gary J. Havens                          /s/John B. Snyder
-----------------                          -----------------
Gary J. Havens                             John B. Snyder
President and Chief Executive Officer      Vice President and Chief Financial
                                             Officer



August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,126,995
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,279,484
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               697,799
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,636,918
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,722,529
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,863,715
<LOANS>                                     95,721,657
<ALLOWANCE>                                    600,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             110,897,572
<DEPOSITS>                                  67,756,446
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,950,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,129,103
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,610,883
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,451,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             110,897,572
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,984,593
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              110,339
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                94,801
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,189,733
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             829,005
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             951,416
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,238,317
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   30,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                492,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                749,436
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     749,436
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   463,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.68
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   312,828
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               570,417
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              600,417
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        600,417
        

</TABLE>
EX PARTE Terry Nathan BASS

CR-16-0253

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. granted.
Draquan Quintodd GERALD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1792

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Sergio V. BENCOMO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5122

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018.

Patrick B. Calcutt of Calcutt & Calcutt P.A., Americus, Georgia, and Dana A. Friedlander, Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Linsey Sims-Bohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.