Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Notices 9579 

assembly or boom assembly. Forklifts are 

material handling vehicles with a working 

attachment, usually a fork, lifted along a 

vertical guide rail with the operator seated or 

standing on the chassis behind the vertical 

mast. Vertical mast lifts are person and 

material lifting vehicles with a working 

attachment, usually a platform, lifted along a 

vertical guide rail with an operator standing 

on the platform. Mobile self-propelled cranes 

are material handling vehicles with a boom 

attachment for lifting loads of tools or 

materials that are suspended on ropes, 

cables, and/or chains, and which contain 

winches mounted on or near the base of the 

boom with ropes, cables, and/or chains 

managed along the boom structure. The 

scope also excludes motor vehicles (defined 

as a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical 

power and manufactured primarily for use on 

public streets, roads, and highways, but does 

not include a vehicle operated only on a rail 

line pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(7)) that 

incorporate a scissor arm assembly or boom 

assembly. The scope further excludes 

vehicles driven or drawn by mechanical 

power operated only on a rail line that 

incorporate a scissor arm assembly or boom 

assembly. The scope also excludes: (1) Rail 

line vehicles, defined as vehicles with hi-rail 

gear or track wheels, and a fixed (nontelescopic) main boom, which perform 

operations on rail lines, such as laying rails, 

setting ties, or other rail maintenance jobs; 

and (2) certain rail line vehicle 

subassemblies, defined as chassis 

subassemblies and boom turntable 

subassemblies for rail line vehicles with a 

fixed (non-telescopic) main boom. 

Certain mobile access equipment subject to 

this investigation is typically classifiable 

under subheadings 8427.10.8020, 

8427.10.8030, 8427.10.8070, 8427.10.8095, 

8427.20.8020, 8427.20.8090, 8427.90.0020 

and 8427.90.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Parts 

of certain mobile access equipment are 

typically classifiable under subheading 

8431.20.0000 of the HTSUS. While the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes only, the 

written description of the merchandise under 

investigation is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Investigation 

IV. Scope of Investigation 

V. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the 

Act 

VI. Adjustment to Cash Deposit Rate For 

Export Subsidies 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

VIII. Discussion of the Issues 

Issues Related to Dingli 

Comment 1: Should China to the United 

States Ocean Freight Surrogate Values 

(SVs) be Revised 

Comment 2: Should World to Brazil Ocean 

Freight SVs be Revised 

Comment 3: Should Commerce Multiply 

the Value of Marine Insurance to Cover 

110 percent of the Total Value of the 

Goods Shipped 

Comment 4: Should Commerce Include 

Research and Development Expenses in 

General and Administrative Expenses for 

Further Manufacturing 

Comment 5: Should Commerce Reject 

Dingli’s Submission of Untimely New 

Factual Information 

Comment 6: Should Commerce Make 

Revisions to its SVs for Dingli’s Inputs 

for the Final Determination 

Comment 7: Should Commerce Value 

Certain Inputs that Include Alloy and 

Non-Alloy Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

Headings Based on a Simple Average of 

SVs 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce’s 

Application of the Cohen’s-d Test to 

Dingli’s U.S. Sales is Unsupported by 

Substantial Evidence and Controlling 

Law 

Issues Related LGMG 

Comment 9: Should Commerce Revise its 

SVs for LGMG’s Inputs for the Final 

Determination 

Comment 10: Should Commerce Apply 

Circumstance of Sale Adjustments to 

Certain LGMG Sales for the Final 

Determination 

Issues Related to Dingli and LGMG 

Comment 11: Should Commerce Deduct 

Section 301 Duties from U.S. Sales Prices 

in Calculating Dingli’s and LGMG’s 

Dumping Margin 

Issues Related to Skyjack Inc. (Skyjack) 

Comment 12: Whether Skyjack is Entitled 

to a Separate Rate 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–03660 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket Number: 220210–0045] 

Evaluating and Improving NIST 

Cybersecurity Resources: The 

Cybersecurity Framework and 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk 

Management 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; request for information. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) is 

seeking information to assist in 

evaluating and improving its 

cybersecurity resources, including the 

‘‘Framework for Improving Critical 

Infrastructure Cybersecurity’’ (the 

‘‘NIST Cybersecurity Framework,’’ 

‘‘CSF’’ or ‘‘Framework’’) and a variety of 

existing and potential standards, 

guidelines, and other information, 

including those relating to improving 

cybersecurity in supply chains. NIST is 

considering updating the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework to account for 

the changing landscape of cybersecurity 

risks, technologies, and resources. In 

addition, NIST recently announced it 

would launch the National Initiative for 

Improving Cybersecurity in Supply 

Chains (NIICS) to address cybersecurity 

risks in supply chains. This wideranging public-private partnership will 

focus on identifying tools and guidance 

for technology developers and 

providers, as well as performanceoriented guidance for those acquiring 

such technology. To inform the 

direction of the NIICS, including how it 

might be aligned and integrated with the 

Cybersecurity Framework, NIST is 

requesting information that will support 

the identification and prioritization of 

supply chain-related cybersecurity 

needs across sectors. Responses to this 

RFI will inform a possible revision of 

the Cybersecurity Framework as well as 

the NIICS initiative. 

DATES: Comments in response to this 

notice must be received by April 25, 

2022. Submissions received after that 

date may not be considered. 

Comments may be submitted by any 

of the following methods: 

Electronic submission: Submit 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. 

1. Go to www.regulations.gov and 

enter NIST–2022–0001 in the search 

field, 

2. Click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, 

complete the required fields, and 

3. Enter or attach your comments. 

Electronic submissions may also be 

sent as an attachment to CSF-SCRMRFI@nist.gov and may be in any of the 

following unlocked formats: HTML; 

ASCII; Word; RTF; or PDF. Please 

submit comments only and include your 

name, organization’s name (if any), and 

cite ‘‘NIST Cybersecurity RFI’’ in all 

correspondence. Comments containing 

references, studies, research, and other 

empirical data that are not widely 

published should include copies of the 

referenced materials. Please do not 

submit additional materials. 

Comments received by the deadline 

may be posted at www.regulations.gov 

and https://www.nist.gov/ 

cyberframework. All submissions, 

including attachments and other 

supporting materials, may become part 

of the public record and may be subject 

to public disclosure. NIST reserves the 

right to publish relevant comments 

publicly, unedited and in their entirety. 

Personal information, such as account 

numbers or Social Security numbers, or 

names of other individuals, should not 

be included. Do not submit confidential 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
9580 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Notices 

business information, or otherwise 

sensitive or protected information. 

Comments that contain profanity, 

vulgarity, threats, or other inappropriate 

language or content will not be 

considered. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

questions about this RFI contact: CSFSCRM-RFI@nist.gov or Katherine 

MacFarland, National Institute of 

Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Stop 2000, Gaithersburg, MD 

20899; (301) 975–3359. Direct media 

inquiries to NIST’s Office of Public 

Affairs at (301) 975–2762. Users of 

telecommunication devices for the deaf, 

or a text telephone, may call the Federal 

Relay Service, toll free at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

Accessible Format: NIST will make 

the RFI available in alternate formats, 

such as Braille or large print, upon 

request by persons with disabilities. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework consists of 

standards, methodologies, procedures, 

and processes that align policy, 

business, and technological approaches 

to reduce cybersecurity risks. It is used 

widely by private and public sector 

organizations in and outside of the 

United States and has been translated 

into multiple languages, speaking to its 

success as a common resource. 

The Cybersecurity Framework was 

last updated in April 2018. Much has 

changed in the cybersecurity landscape 

in terms of threats, capabilities, 

technologies, education and workforce, 

and the availability of resources to help 

organizations to better manage 

cybersecurity risk. That includes an 

increased awareness of and emphasis on 

cybersecurity risks in supply chains, 

including a decision to launch NIICS. 

With those changes in mind, NIST seeks 

to build on its efforts to cultivate trust 

by advancing cybersecurity and privacy 

standards and guidelines, technology, 

measurements, and practices by 

requesting information about the use, 

adequacy, and timeliness of the 

Cybersecurity Framework and the 

degree to which other NIST resources 

are used in conjunction with or instead 

of the Framework. Further, to inform the 

direction of the NIICS, including how it 

might be aligned and integrated with the 

Cybersecurity Framework, NIST is 

requesting information that will support 

the identification and prioritization of 

supply chain-related cybersecurity 

needs across sectors. 

Following is a non-exhaustive list of 

possible topics that may be addressed in 

any comments. Comments may address 

topics in the following list, or any other 

topic believed to have implications for 

the improvement of the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework or NIST’s 

cybersecurity guidance regarding supply 

chains. NIST will consider all relevant 

comments in the development of the 

revised Framework and guidance 

regarding supply chains. 

Use of the NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework 

1. The usefulness of the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework for aiding 

organizations in organizing 

cybersecurity efforts via the five 

functions in the Framework and actively 

managing risks using those five 

functions. 

2. Current benefits of using the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework. Are 

communications improved within and 

between organizations and entities (e.g., 

supply chain partners, customers, or 

insurers)? Does the Framework allow for 

better assessment of risks, more effective 

management of risks, and/or increase 

the number of potential ways to manage 

risks? What might be relevant metrics 

for improvements to cybersecurity as a 

result of implementation of the 

Framework? 

3. Challenges that may prevent 

organizations from using the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework or using it 

more easily or extensively (e.g., resource 

considerations, information sharing 

restrictions, organizational factors, 

workforce gaps, or complexity). 

4. Any features of the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework that should be 

changed, added, or removed. These 

might include additions or 

modifications of: Functions, Categories, 

or Subcategories; Tiers; Profile 

Templates; references to standards, 

frameworks, models, and guidelines; 

guidance on how to use the 

Cybersecurity Framework; or references 

to critical infrastructure versus the 

Framework’s broader use. 

5. Impact to the usability and 

backward compatibility of the NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework if the 

structure of the framework such as 

Functions, Categories, Subcategories, 

etc. is modified or changed. 

6. Additional ways in which NIST 

could improve the Cybersecurity 

Framework, or make it more useful. 

Relationship of the NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework to Other Risk Management 

Resources 

7. Suggestions for improving 

alignment or integration of the 

Cybersecurity Framework with other 

NIST risk management resources. As 

part of the response, please indicate 

benefits and challenges of using these 

resources alone or in conjunction with 

the Cybersecurity Framework. These 

resources include: 

• Risk management resources such as 

the NIST Risk Management Framework, 

the NIST Privacy Framework, and 

Integrating Cybersecurity and Enterprise 

Risk Management (NISTIR 8286). 

• Trustworthy technology resources 

such as the NIST Secure Software 

Development Framework, the NIST 

Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity 

Capabilities Baseline, and the Guide to 

Industrial Control System 

Cybersecurity. 

• Workforce management resources 

such as the National Initiative for 

Cybersecurity Education (NICE) 

Workforce Framework for 

Cybersecurity. 

8. Use of non-NIST frameworks or 

approaches in conjunction with the 

NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Are 

there commonalities or conflicts 

between the NIST framework and other 

voluntary, consensus resources? Are 

there commonalities or conflicts 

between the NIST framework and 

cybersecurity-related mandates or 

resources from government agencies? 

Are there ways to improve alignment or 

integration of the NIST framework with 

other frameworks, such as international 

approaches like the ISO/IEC 27000- 

series, including ISO/IEC TS 27110? 

9. There are numerous examples of 

international adaptations of the 

Cybersecurity Framework by other 

countries. The continued use of 

international standards for 

cybersecurity, with a focus on 

interoperability, security, usability, and 

resilience can promote innovation and 

competitiveness while enabling 

organizations to more easily and 

effectively integrate new technologies 

and services. Given this importance, 

what steps should NIST consider to 

ensure any update increases 

international use of the Cybersecurity 

Framework? 

10. References that should be 

considered for inclusion within NIST’s 

Online Informative References Program. 

This program is an effort to define 

standardized relationships between 

NIST and industry resources and 

elements of documents, products, and 

services and various NIST documents 

such as the NIST Cybersecurity 

Framework, NIST Privacy Framework, 

Security and Privacy Controls for 

Information Systems and Organizations 

(NIST Special Publication 800–53), 

NIST Secure Software Development 

Framework, and the NIST Internet of 

Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Capabilities 

Baseline. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Notices 9581 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk 

Management 

11. National Initiative for Improving 

Cybersecurity in Supply Chains (NIICS). 

What are the greatest challenges related 

to the cybersecurity aspects of supply 

chain risk management that the NIICS 

could address? How can NIST build on 

its current work on supply chain 

security, including software security 

work stemming from E.O. 14028, to 

increase trust and assurance in 

technology products, devices, and 

services? 

12. Approaches, tools, standards, 

guidelines, or other resources necessary 

for managing cybersecurity-related risks 

in supply chains. NIST welcomes input 

on such resources in narrowly defined 

areas (e.g. pieces of hardware or 

software assurance or assured services, 

or specific to only one or two sectors) 

that may be useful to utilize more 

broadly; potential low risk, high reward 

resources that could be facilitated across 

diverse disciplines, sectors, or 

stakeholders; as well as large-scale and 

extremely difficult areas. 

13. Are there gaps observed in 

existing cybersecurity supply chain risk 

management guidance and resources, 

including how they apply to 

information and communications 

technology, operational technology, IoT, 

and industrial IoT? In addition, do NIST 

software and supply chain guidance and 

resources appropriately address 

cybersecurity challenges associated with 

open-source software? Are there 

additional approaches, tools, standards, 

guidelines, or other resources that NIST 

should consider to achieve greater 

assurance throughout the software 

supply chain, including for open-source 

software? 

14. Integration of Framework and 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk 

Management Guidance. Whether and 

how cybersecurity supply chain risk 

management considerations might be 

further integrated into an updated NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework—or whether 

and how a new and separate framework 

focused on cybersecurity supply chain 

risk management might be valuable and 

more appropriately be developed by 

NIST. 

Alicia Chambers, 

NIST Executive Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03642 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XB822] 

Western Pacific Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meetings 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meetings. 

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery 

Management Council (Council) will 

hold its American Samoa Fishery 

Archipelago Fishery Ecosystem Plan 

(FEP) Advisory Panel (AP), Mariana 

Archipelago FEP-Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) AP, 

Mariana Archipelago FEP-Guam AP, 

Fishing Industry Advisory Committee 

(FIAC), and the Hawaii Archipelago FEP 

AP to discuss and make 

recommendations on fishery 

management issues in the Western 

Pacific Region. 

DATES: The meetings will be held 

between March 8 and March 11, 2022. 

For specific times and agendas, see 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. 

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held 

by web conference via Webex. 

Instructions for connecting to the web 

conference and providing oral public 

comments will be posted on the Council 

website at www.wpcouncil.org. For 

assistance with the web conference 

connection, contact the Council office at 

(808) 522–8220. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director, 

Western Pacific Fishery Management 

Council; phone: (808) 522–8220. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

American Samoa Archipelago FEP AP 

will meet on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 

from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., The Mariana 

Archipelago FEP–CNMI AP will meet 

on Thursday, March 10, 2022, from 9 

a.m. to 11 a.m., the Mariana Archipelago 

FEP-Guam AP will meet on Thursday 

March 10, 2022, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 

p.m., the FIAC will meet on Thursday, 

March 10, 2022, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m., 

and the Hawaii Archipelago FEP AP 

will meet on Friday, March 11, from 9 

a.m. to 12 noon. All times listed are 

local island times expect for the FIAC 

which is in Hawaii Standard Time. 

Public Comment periods will be 

provided in the agendas. The order in 

which agenda items are addressed may 

change. The meetings will run as late as 

necessary to complete scheduled 

business. 

Schedule and Agenda for the American 

Samoa Archipelago AP Meeting 

Tuesday, March 8, 2022, 6 p.m.–8 p.m. 

(American Samoa Standard Time) 

1. Welcome and Introductions 

2. Review of Last AP Meeting and 

Recommendations 

3. American Samoa (AS) Fishery Issues 

and Activities 

A. Bottomfish 

i. Options for Revising the Territorial 

Bottomfish Management Unit 

Species (BMUS) 

ii. American Samoa Bottomfish Data 

Workshop 

B. Council Coordination Committee 

(CCC) Working Group on Equity 

and Environmental Justice (EEJ) 

C. Fishery Biological Opinions 

(BiOPs) Update 

4. 2022 AP Activities Plan 

A. Update on Sustainable Fisheries 

Fund Projects 

B. Catchit Logit (CILI) Update 

C. Education and Outreach 

5. Feedback From The Fleet 

A. AS Fishermen Observations 

B. AP Fishery Issues and Activities 

6. Public Comment 

7. Discussion and Recommendations 

8. Other Business 

Schedule and Agenda for the Mariana 

Archipelago-CNMI AP Meeting 

Thursday, March 10, 2022, 9 a.m.–11 

a.m. (Marianas Standard Time) 

1. Welcome and Introductions 

2. Review of Last AP Meeting and 

Recommendations 

3. CNMI Fishery Issues and Activities 

A. Bottomfish 

i. Options for Revising the Territorial 

BMUS 

ii. Fishery BiOPs Update 

B. Marianas Sanctuary Nomination 

C. CILI Updates 

D. CCC Working Group on EEJ 

4. 2022 Advisory Panel Activities Plan 

A. AP Outreach and Education 

5. Feedback From The Fleet 

A. CNMI Fishermen Observations 

B. AP Fishery Issues and Activities 

6. Discussion and Recommendations 

7. Other Business 

Schedule and Agenda for the Mariana 

Archipelago-Guam AP Meeting 

Thursday, March 10, 2022, 6:30 p.m.– 

8:30 p.m. (Marianas Standard Time) 

1. Welcome and Introductions 

2. Review of Last AP Meeting and 

Recommendations 

3. Guam Fishery Issues and Activities 

A. Bottomfish 

i. Options for Revising the Territorial 

BMUS 

ii. Fishery BiOPs Update 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1