T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. RI CH A RD D A V I S, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10150 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c r- 00 13 1-D G C -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d G . C a m pbe l l , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d M cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i c ha r d D a vi s appe a l s f r om the s e nt e nc e – 180 m onths i n pr i s on a nd s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e f

orl i f e – i m pos e d f

ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty pl e a t o one c ountof tr a n s p o r tin g c h ild p o rn o g r ap h y in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 2 A ( a ) ( 1 ) . D a v is a r gue s tha tthe di s tr i c tc our te rr e d i n i m pos i ng a l i f e t i m e s e nt e nc e , i n s e nt e nc i ng



# FI LED DE C 22 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

h im to tr e a tm e n t th a t c o u ld in c lu d e p le th y s m o g r ap h te s tin g a n d A B E L A s s e s s m e n t, a nd i n de l e ga t i ng the de c i s i on of w he the rt o r e qui r e phy s i ol ogi c a l t e s t i ng t o the prob at i on offi ce r by di re ct i ng the offi ce r t o sel ec ta s ex offender tre atm entprog ra m f orD a vi s t o a tt e nd. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e a f f i rm a nd re m and t o the di stri ctcourtt o correc tthe w ri tt en j ud gm entt o com po rtw i th the oral pron ou ncem entof the se nt ence . W hether adefe nd anthas w ai ved the ri gh tt o app ea l i s aqu es t i on of l aw r e v ie w e d d e n o v o . U

ni te d State s v . W

at s on , 58 2 F . 3d 97 4, 98 1 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). In hi s pl eaagre em ent , D avi s w ai ved “ any r i gh tt o app ea l the . . . se nt ence ” i m po se d u p o n h im , in c lu d in g th e te rm s o f s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e . Se e id. a t 9 8 6 ( r e f e r e n c e to

“ ‘ an y asp ecto f th e sen t en ce’ u n am b i g u o u sl y en co m p asse[s] su p erv i sed rel ease t erm s” ). In arg u i n g th ath e m ay n ev erth el ess ap p eal th e o ral l y i m p o sed co n d i t i o n s, D a v is a r g u e s th a t b e c a u s e th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d id n o t s p e c if ic a lly a r tic u la te its r e a s ons f ori m pos i ng the s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e s e nt e nc e , the s e nt e nc e vi ol a t e s the t erm s of the pl eaagre em ent . Itdo es no t . N ei ther the pl eaagre em entno r the l aw re qu i re s a n exp l anat i on of w hy a l i fe t i m e t erm of supervi se d rel ea se or se x of f e nde rtr e a tm e nti nc l udi ng A B E L A s s e s s m e ntw a s appr opr i a t e , a f t e rthe e xt e ns i ve j us t i f

i c a t i on of

the pr i s on s e nt e nc e appl y i ng the s a m e f a c t or s a nd the3

pres ent ence i nv es t i gat i on re po rt ’ s tre atm entof the i ss ue. See 1 8 U . S. C. §§ 35 83 (c ), (d)( 1); U

n ite d S ta te s v . D a n ie ls , 54 1 F . 3d 91 5, 92 1– 22 (9th C i r. 20 08 ); see a l so U n i ted S ta tes v. Esp a rza , 55 2 F . 3d 10 88 , 10 90 n. 3 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per curi am ). D avi s’ s c on t ent i on thatthe prob at i on offi ce r’ s abi l i ty t o enforce the se nt ence i m pos e d by the di s tr i c tc our ti m pl i c a t e s a s i gni f i c a ntl i be r ty i nt e r e s ti s w i thout m e r it. Se e D a n ie ls , 54 1 F . 3d at92 6 (“ ‘ A bel t es t i ng do es no ti m pl i ca t e a part i cul ar l y s i gn i fi ca ntl i berty i nt er es t ’ ”) . T he gove rnm e ntc onc e de s tha tthe or a l pr onounc e m e nt , w hi c h doe s not prov i de for pl ethysm og raph t es t i ng , confl i ct s w i th the w ri tt en j ud gm ent , w hi ch d o e s , a n d th e r e f

o r e , th e te rm m u s t b e s tr ic k e n . W e r e m a n d to th e d is tr ic t c o u r t to c o rr e c t its w r itte n ju d g m e n t a c c o r d in g ly . See U ni ted Stat es v. Hi ck

s , 997 F . 2d 594, 59 7 (9th C i r. 19 93 ). A F F IR M E D an d R E M A N D E D w i th d i re ct i on to corre ct th e w ri tt en ju d gm en t t o con form to th e oralse n te n ce .