alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jones *vs.*Chiles.

October 19.

Error to the Montgomery Circuit; Silas W. Robbies, Judge.

*Injunction. Execution. Judgment. Statutes.*Release»

OntECE&s'.

Caso 112.

R\t noi^n * powwvipnauain ithe jimior form-the e fecuHon of a *httlmw fanm*against °-ai 11TMwhom" there wai no judgment, & oHlmclahn — Hold that there could tionlo^uch" an *execution*—But the. bill able under1' the statue,for a release of *341the junior patentee’s claim,

*340Judge Mills

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The, complainant, below, now appellant, filed his al]eS*,,S tkat he had the eldest patent and a special entry on a tract of land, and had had twenty years undisturbed possession thereof; that the appellee, Clitics, had a junior patent covering life same, and some adjoining land, and had brought an action of ejectment against others out side of his bounda,.y3 ami liad named his tenant, as one *of*the tenants possession, but had never served the notice and declaration upon his tenant or himseEf; that the other tenants had entered themselves defendants, and a cecovory 'yas bad against them, and that when the writ of possession was sued out, it was against Ais tenant, also, and Chiles had threatened to execute it llPon <cnani- Be prayed an injunction, and that Chiles might be compelled to release his claim. On demurrer, the court dissolved the injunction and ‘dismissed the bill with costs; from which decree he has appealed- We agree with the court below that, from the. complainants own statements, he had tio *341seed of an injunction, that if there was no judgment either against him or tenant, the writ could not affect him, and that if there was an an attempt to execute the writ on his possession, he had ample remedy in a court of law, which could correct the abuse of its own process. But still we think that the court erred iu dismissing the bill. For an Act of assembly of this state expressly authorizes the holder of an elder grant, to file his bill against a junior patentee, and to try the merits of, and procure a release of the younger patent, and the bill of the complainant substantially makes out a case within the statute.

*Triplett*for plaintiff; *Mayes*for defendant.

The decree is, therefore, reversed with costs, the cause remanded, for new proceedings, not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jesus VENTURA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-10237 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jesus Ventura, Pro Se

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Ventura has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ventura has not filed a response. Although Ventura remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur *368with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, *see United States v. Heredia-Holguin,*823 F.3d 337, 340 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Presidential Documents

10289 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 36 

Wednesday, February 23, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of February 18, 2022 

Continuation of the National Emergency Concerning the 

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19) Pandemic 

On March 13, 2020, by Proclamation 9994, the President declared a national 

emergency concerning the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic. 

The COVID–19 pandemic continues to cause significant risk to the public 

health and safety of the Nation. For this reason, the national emergency 

declared on March 13, 2020, and beginning March 1, 2020, must continue 

in effect beyond March 1, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the 

national emergency declared in Proclamation 9994 concerning the COVID– 

19 pandemic. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 18, 2022. [FR Doc. 2022–03972 

Filed 2–22–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOCBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1526

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Joshua Don Lineberry,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith

 ____________

 Submitted: June 21, 2022

Filed: July 6, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Lineberry appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after he

pleaded guilty to an odometer tampering offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw

1The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.
and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

reasonableness of the sentence. Lineberry has filed a motion for new counsel on

appeal.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Lineberry’s sentence was not

unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant

factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a

clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v.

Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review); see

also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). As to Lineberry’s

pro se arguments that counsel was ineffective, we conclude that they would be better

addressed on collateral review. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d

824, 826-27 (8th Cir. 2006).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we

affirm, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we deny Lineberry’s motion for

new counsel as moot.

______________________________

-2-
#### Anthony M. Strong, Respondent, *v.*Adam Blake, 2d, et al., Appellants.

*G. L. Steelman*for the respondent.

Judgment affirmed by default, with costs.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blockbuster Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Larry J. Zine, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: March 15, 2006



/S/    LARRY J.
ZINELarry J. Zine Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
#### Kevin J. MUTH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Pam HEARN; Tammy Poole; Joel Williams; Michelle Norris; James LeBlanc; Jerry Goodwin, Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-31073 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed November 1, 2017

*439Kevin J. Muth, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Kevin J. Muth, Louisiana prisoner # 631935, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S1C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A. He also moves for document production. In his complaint, Muth alleged that the defendants acted •with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. Specifically, he asserted that prison officials ignored medical issues, stemming from his diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome and other medical conditions. He re-urges those challenges on appeal.

Muth’s arguments are unavailing. Even if the assertions in his complaint are true, his contentions effectively amount to a disagreement with the treatment and care provided and do not amount to a constitutional violation. *Varnado v. Lynaugh,*920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991); *see Gobert v. Caldwell,*463 F.3d 339, 346, 349 n.32 (5th Cir. 2006); *Mendoza v. Lynaugh,*989 F.2d 191, 194-95 (5th Cir. 1993). To the extent that Muth is arguing, with the benefit of liberal construction, that prison officials sent him to administrative segregation in retaliation for his medical requests, his conclusional allegations do not show any retaliatory motive from prison officials or but-for causation. *See Woods v. Smith,*60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the dismissal of Muth’s § 1983 action is AFFIRMED. His motion for document production is DENIED AS MOOT.

Our affirmance and the district court’s dismissal count as a single strike under § 1915(g). *See*§ 1915(g); *Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Muth is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Consent of Guido Mantega, the Minister of Finance



 Exhibit 4(8) 
 FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL 
 MINISTRY OF FINANCE 

CONSENT 
 I,
Guido Mantega, Minister of Finance of the Federative Republic of Brazil, hereby consent to the reference to my name, in my official capacity as Minister of Finance, under the caption “Official Statements” in the Prospectus of the
Federative Republic of Brazil included in the Registration Statement filed by the Federative Republic of Brazil with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

	
	
	/s/ Guido Mantega
	 Guido Mantega
 Minister of Finance
#### Eagle Nest Corporation, Respondent, *v.*Charles S. Carroll et al., Individually and Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Indian Lake, et al., Appellants.

Submitted May 20, 1943;

decided May 21, 1943.

*767
      *George N. Ostrander*for appellants.

*J. Theodore Cross*for respondents.

Leave to withdraw appeal granted, without costs.
..-.... 


~ 

Indianapolis Airport Authority 

7800 Col. H. Weir Cook Memorial Dr. 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46241 

office 317.487.9594 

(ax 317.487.5034 

March 19, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New jersey Avenue, SE 

Was~i~~ton, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalf of the Indianapolis Airport Authority, I am writing to express our strong 

support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and 

Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where 

many corporations have strong trade and market presence with japan. There are over 

220 Japanese companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose business models 

rely on access to japan and its market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has 

created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the 

convenience of flying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and an airport that can support 

trans-pacific routes. Nearly half of our airport's travelers select Delta when making their 

travel arrangements to japan. The addition for Delta of Haneda as a destination is a 

natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. 

john D. Clark III 

Executive Director/CEO 

www.indianapolisairport.com
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT

CASE NUMBER: P03-0285

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 2 2

KEYWORDS:

NEURO

ACUTE
IRR-E,MM

UNCERT-DEVEL
AQUATOX-A,C

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Solid
S (25 E C) < 1(E); H < 1.00E-8(E) MP (C) = 209(M); BP (C) > 220 dec(M); VP @ 25C (mm) < 1.0E-6(E) POTW removal (%) = Anion 90 via biodeg; Cation 50-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg: Anion wk; Cation mo PBT Potential: Anion P1B1T2; Cation P2B1T2 Sorption to soils/sediments: Anion low; Cation strong-v.strong *CEB FATE: Migr to ground water: Anion rapid; Cation negl-slow

HEALTH: Absorption is nil through the skin based on physical/chemical properties and good through the lungs and GI tract based on analogs. This compound is in the highly acutely toxic range with an oral LD50 of 312 mg/kg in males and 441 mg/kg in females. Possible signs of neurotoxicity were noted in the acute oral study. The PMN compound is expected to be irritating to the eyes and mucous membranes based on the necrosis and hemorrhaging seen in the GI tract in the acute oral study. There is also uncertain concern for developmental toxicity for the
benzenesulfonate derivative. *CEB HEALTH: Moderate concern (Inhalation only).

TOXICITY DATA: acute oral study in rats - LD50 = 312 mg/kg in males and 441 mg/kg in females; slight to severe weakness, vasodilation, reduced feces, dehydration, piloerection; tremors and convulsions seen prior to death in animals that died the day of dosing; necrosis and gastric hemorrhage in the glandular gastric mucosa
and necrosis of the small intestine
not a skin irritantECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:
fish 96-h LC50 = 3.2 P daphnid 48-h LC50 = 2.1 P green algal 96-h EC50 <= 2.0 P fish Chronic Value (ChV) = 0.300 P daphnid ChV = 0.200 P algal ChV <= 0.200 P Predictions based on SARs for cationic surfactants; SAR chemical class = surfactant-cationic-N-monoalkyl; MW396; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; ECs based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; moderate concern for toxicity;

assessment factor =10.0 concern concentration (CC) = 0.020 mg/L (ppm)

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water

Becky Jones 564-8919
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Micromem Technologies Inc. (the"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Fuda, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

        (2) The information contained inthis Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 25, 2005

|   | "Joseph Fuda" (signed) |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Joseph Fuda                      |
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10305-10306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9960]
RIN 1545-BP79


Guidance Under Section 958 on Determining Stock Ownership; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to the final regulations 
(Treasury Decision 9960), published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 
January 25, 2022. The final regulations regarding the treatment of 
domestic partnerships for purposes of determining amounts included in 
the gross income of their partners with respect to foreign 
corporations.

DATES: These corrections are effective on February 24, 2022, and 
applicable on or after January 25, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward J. Tracy at (202) 317-6934 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9960) subject to this correction are 
issued under section 951 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations (TD 9960), contain errors that 
need to be corrected.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the final regulation (TD 9960), that are the subject 
of FR Doc. 2022-00066, published on January 25, 2022 (87 FR 3648), are 
corrected to read as follows:
    On page 3652, the third column, the thirty-second line through the 
forty-third line from the top of the first full paragraph is corrected 
to read ``year ending December 31, 2023. Accordingly, for their taxable 
year ending December 31, 2023, the U.S. shareholder partners would have 
a distributive share of the partnership's section 951 inclusion for the 
CFC's taxable year ending December 31, 2022 (for the U.S. shareholder 
partnership's taxable year ending June 30, 2023) and would also have a 
direct section 951 inclusion for the CFC's

[[Page 10306]]

taxable year ending December 31, 2023.''

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2022-03612 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Sangeon Park, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MB Tech, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:   May 3, 2004



/s/ Sangeon Park

Sangeon Park

Chief Financial Officer
bonz_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


 






 




  





1











  









 




  





2











  









 




  





3











  









 




  





4











  









 




  





5











  









 




  





6











  









 




  





7











  









8
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6506 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the Secretary of the 

Interior to conduct a study on the feasibility of designating Washington’s 

Trail—1753 as a national historic trail, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2023 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, Ms. LEE of Pennsylvania, Mr. MOONEY, and Mr. 

DELUZIO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to direct the 

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study on the 

feasibility of designating Washington’s Trail—1753 as 

a national historic trail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington’s Trail— 

5 1753 National Historic Trail Feasibility Study Act of 

6 2023’’. 

2 

•HR 6506 IH

1 SEC. 2. WASHINGTON’S TRAIL—1753 NATIONAL HISTORIC 

2 TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

3 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(50) WASHINGTON’S TRAIL—1753.—Washing7 ton’s TrailWashington’s Trail—1753 National His8 toric Trail Feasibility Study Act of 20231753, ex9 tending approximately 500 miles from Williamsburg, 

10 Virginia, to Fort LeBoeuf (now Waterford), Penn11 sylvania, following the route taken by George Wash12 ington and his party on his diplomatic mission to the 

13 French on behalf of Virginia Governor Robert 

14 Dinwiddie from October 31, 1753, to January 16, 

15 1754, just prior to the start of the French and In16 dian War (1754–1763).’’. 

Æ
Leon Anthony ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2078

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.