alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,965
<INVENTORY>                                     49,184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,337
<PP&E>                                          96,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,403
<BONDS>                                        305,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,359
<SALES>                                        184,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,191
<CGS>                                          143,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,528
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,528
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Mike Peller and Abraham Podinker, Appellants.

Argued April 15, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*906
      *Harry G. Anderson*and *Samuel Bader*for Mike Peller, appellant.

*James D. C. Murray*and *Daniel Kirchman*for Abraham Podinker, appellant.

*Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Stanley H. Fuld*and *Richard G. Denzer*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgments of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.

Loughran, J.,

concurs in the following memorandum: An accomplice-witness can be sufficiently corroborated solely by a testimonial report of an extra-judicial oral admission of the accused, though such report is made only by a thoroughly discredited witness. *(People*v. *Buchalter,*289 N. Y. 181.)

*907Rippey, J.,

concurs as to Podinker, but dissents and votes to reverse as to Peller on the ground that the evidence is insufficient as matter of law to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
#### Jason WALKER, also known as Jason Renard Walker, also known as Jonathon Dotson, also known as Johnathon Dotson, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Rodney W. KILLOUGH, Correctional Officer IV, Defendant-Appellee

No. 15-11219 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 2, 2017

Jason Walker, Pro Se

Ariel Nicole Wiley, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Law Enforcement Defense Division, Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jason Walker, Texas prisoner # 1532092, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against eight inmate medical care providers and three correctional officers. Walker alleged that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs following the accidental administration to him of another inmate’s medication. The district court dismissed the claims against most of the defendants for failure to state a claim, leaving pending only- claims against medical aide Helen Kitchen and correctional officer Rodney W. Killough. After Walker filed an amended complaint asserting claims against only Kitchen, the district court sua sponte dismissed the claims against Kil-lough for failure to prosecute. Walker now appeals that decision.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). Because Walker’s claims against Kitchen remain unadjudicated in the district court, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292(a), (b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Briargrove Shopping Ctr. Joint Venture v. Pilgrim Enters., Inc.,*170 F.3d 536, 538-41 (5th Cir. *2911999). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Johnathan FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Chad L. SAMUELS; Jackie F. Bush; Michael W. Stevens; Carl M. Burson; Richard Waldron, Defendants-Appellees

No. 15-40390 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed April 25, 2017

*391Johnathan Franklin, Pro Se

Daniel Christopher Neuhoff, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Law Enforcement Defense Division, Austin, TX, Matthew James Greer, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, General Litigation Division, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Ap-pellees

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Johnathan Franklin, Texas prisoner # 1550282, appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. He also moves for the appointment of counsel. In his § 1983 complaint, Franklin alleged that a number of correctional staff were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk to his health and safety in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. He also alleged that staff retaliated against him by telling inmates that he was an informant.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same standard as that employed by the district court. *Carnaby v. City of Houston,*636 F.3d 183, 187 (5th Cir. 2011). Summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). If the moving party establishes this, the burden shifts to the nonmovant to set forth specific evidence to support his claims. *Duffie v. United States,*600 F.3d 362, 371 (5th Cir. 2010).

Here, Franklin failed to bring forward any specific evidence to support his allegation that correctional staff retaliated against him or that staff were deliberately indifferent to the risk of inmate violence against him. *See Duffie,*600 F.3d at 371; *Adames v. Perez,*331 F.3d 508, 515 (5th Cir. 2003). In the absence of any evidence that the defendants had a subjective awareness of an excessive risk to Franklin’s safety or evidence to support his retaliation claim, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendants. *See Hathaway v. Bazany,*507 F.3d 312, 319 (5th Cir. 2007); *Bradley v. Puckett,*157 F.3d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir. 1998).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. In addition, as his case does not present exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel, his motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. *See Ulmer v. Chancellor,*691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATE  PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C.  SUBSECTION  1350

                              EXHIBIT  32.1

                        CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                         18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                         AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
              SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Prime  Air,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  and 10-QSB/A Amendment No. 1 for the quarter ended
September  30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
     material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
     operations  of  the  Company.

Dated  December  5,  2003            /s/  Blaine  Haug
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Blaine  Haug
                                   President  and
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit
32.1














CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE


OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING


FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS









I, Neil
Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Charter Communications
Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications Holdings Capital Corporation (the
"Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and




·
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Neil
Smit


Neil
Smit


President and Chief
Executive Officer


March21, 2008
#### Tiffany FERRARA, Wodsnob, LLC, Appellants v. Courtney SEBASTIANELLI, Appellee

2016-2154

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 13, 2017

Heather Norton, Law Office of Heather Norton, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellants.

James Robert Menker, Holley & Menker, P.A., Atlantic Beach, FL, argued for appellee.

(Wallach, Chen and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17344 and #17345; Washington Disaster Number WA-
00103]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Washington

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Washington dated 02/15/2022.
    Incident: Winter Weather and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 01/05/2022 through 01/16/2022.

DATES: Issued on 02/15/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 4/18/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/15/2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be 
adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Lewis.
Contiguous Counties:
    Washington: Cowlitz, Grays Harbor, Pacific, Pierce, Skamania, 
Thurston, Wahkiakum, Yakima.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     2.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     1.438
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere..................     5.660
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     2.830
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere....     1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.830
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere.     1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17344 6 
and for economic injury is 17345 0.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Washington.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-03847 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 24, 2022.

# PLACE:

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. 

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

                        The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or                               ( print page 10262)                            more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.                    

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

Dated: February 17, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-03859 Filed 2-18-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Brian Jovan NEWMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
eCollege.com:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-108501) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-34326) on
Form S-8 of eCollege.com of our report dated March 12, 2004, except as to Note 2, which is as of August 19th, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of eCollege.com as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of eCollege.com. Our report refers to a change in the method
of accounting for employee stock-based compensation, and a restatement of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Denver,
Colorado
August 19, 2004



QuickLinks
#### PEOPLE *v.*CHEERS.

Appeal from Kalamazoo, Van Valkenburg (Wade), J.

Submitted Division 3 October 3, 1968, at Marquette.

(Docket No. 2,620.)

Decided October 21, 1968.

Velma Cheers was convicted on plea of guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony. Defendant’s motion to withdraw her plea denied. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*Frank J. Kelley,*Attorney General, *Robert A. Derengoski,*Solicitor General, *Donald A. Burge,*Prosecuting Attorney, and *John E. Fitzgerald,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

*Patrick II. McCauley,*for defendant on appeal.

Per Curiam.

After waiving examination, appellant pled guilty on arraignment to a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony. Appellant appeals the subsequent denial of her motion to withdraw the guilty plea.

The record describes a procedure within the ambit of recent guilty plea decisions of the Michigan Supreme Court. *People*v. *Dunn*(1968), 380 Mich 693; *People*v. *Stearns*(1968), 380 Mich 704; *People*v. *Winegar*(1968), 380 Mich 719. Although defend*591ant was intoxicated at the time of the crime, her testimony was sufficiently inculpatory to infer the requisite intent to commit a felony. We find neither prejudicial error nor a miscarriage of justice.

Affirmed.

T. G. Kavanagh, P. J., and McGregor and Philip C. Elliott, JJ., concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force (84629).                

*Date and Time:*                     April 8, 2022, 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.                

*PLACE:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314. Virtual meeting attendance only.                

                    To attend the virtual meeting, please send your request for the virtual meeting link to the following email:                     *cmessam@nsf.gov.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Brenda Williams, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-8900; email:                     *bwilliam@nsf.gov.*

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     The Task Force shall investigate the feasibility and advisability of establishing and sustaining a National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource; and propose a roadmap detailing how such resource should be established and sustained.                

*Agenda:*                     In this meeting, the Task Force members will deliberate on the Task Force's interim report to the President and Congress. The Task Force members will also discuss their work plan for the remainder of 2022 and identify the key issues to study as they develop implementation-focused recommendations for inclusion in their final report.                

Dated: February 22, 2022.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-04101 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
SPAR Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
 
 EXHIBIT 32.2




Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 (this "report"), of SPAR Group, Inc. (the "registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:




1.           The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




/s/ James R. Segreto

James R. Segreto

Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and

Secretary



November 12, 2010











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SPAR Group, Inc. and will be retained by SPAR Group, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.