alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I,
Sheldon Nelson, certify that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MDU Communications
      International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    I
      am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for
      the registrant and have:(a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    
    I
      have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
      over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):(a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information and(b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
      controls over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:  December
      28, 2004
    /s/
      Sheldon NelsonSheldon
      NelsonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02

                 SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                  Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998

                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Additions
                                        ------------------
                             Balance at Charged to               Write-offs
    Allowance for Doubtful   Beginning  Costs and                  Net of   Balance at
           Accounts           of Year    Expenses   Other        Recoveries End of Year
    ----------------------   ---------- ---------- -------       ---------- -----------
   <S>                       <C>        <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
   2000....................   $ 1,627    $ 3,035   $   789(2)       $974      $ 4,477
   1999....................   $   --     $ 1,121   $ 1,103(1)       $597      $ 1,627
   1998....................   $   --     $   --    $   --           $--       $   --
<CAPTION>
   Valuation Allowance for
     Deferred Tax Assets
   -----------------------
   <S>                       <C>        <C>        <C>           <C>        <C>
   2000....................   $16,570    $29,718   $15,780(2)(3)    $--       $62,068
   1999....................   $   929    $ 1,756   $13,885(1)       $--       $16,570
   1998....................   $   928    $     1   $   --           $--       $   929
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Balances acquired from the NSI Reorganization and acquisitions.

(2) Balances acquired from acquisitions.

(3) Balances will be credited to equity upon reduction of valuation allowances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT S EPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS  OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FOUND ON
PAGES 3-5 OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM  10-QSB AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            148,375
<SECURITIES>                                       13,391
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,813,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (185,742)
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2,055,297
<PP&E>                                          1,635,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,132,413)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,302,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,310,805
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          959,289
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,038,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,302,178
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,569,445
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,308,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,169,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 37,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    58,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                58,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       58,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.01



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting  Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference  in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-11728) pertaining to the  Employees Stock Options Plan, Founders Warrants and other Warrants of Wavecom  S.A., of our report dated April 6, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial  statements of Wavecom, included in its Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year  ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ERNST & YOUNG Audit

Represented by Jean-Yves Jégourel

Paris-La Défense, France  April 6, 2007
[767 NYS2d 355]

#### In the Matter of Radisson Community Association, Inc., Appellant, v Donald J. Long, as Acting Assessor of Town of Lysander, et al., Respondents, and Baldwinsville Central School District, Intervenor-Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Fourth Department,

November 21, 2003

*142APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Hancock & Estabrook, LLP,*Syracuse *(Ashley D. Hayes*of counsel), for appellant.

*Coulter, Ventre & Mc Carthy, L.L.P.,*Syracuse *(Robert D. Ventre*of counsel), for respondents.

*O’Hara & O’Connell,*Syracuse *(James J. O’Connell*of counsel), for intervenor-respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hayes, J.

Same opinion by Hayes, J., as in *Matter of Radisson Community Assn. v Long*(3 AD3d 135 [2003]).

Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, and Kehoe, JJ., concur.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed, without costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Iris Lissette DERAS-ELIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50373

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 2, 2017

Christopher Alexander, Assistant U.S., Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Colin M. McDonald, Assistant U.S., U.S. Department of Justice, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Paul William Blake, Paul Blake Attny. at Law, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Iris Lissette Deras-Elias appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 78-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea convictions for importation of methamphetamine and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 52 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Deras-Elias contends that the district court erred by relying on conjecture concerning the number of times she smuggled drugs to deny her request for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its determination that Deras-Elias was not a minor participant for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz,*852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). Contrary to Deras-Elias’s argument, neither the Confrontation Clause, nor' the rules of evidence, are implicated by the court’s sentencing findings. *See*Fed. R. Evid. 1101(d)(3) (federal rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing); *United States v. Littlesun,*444 F.3d 1196, 1199-1200 (9th Cir. 2006) (Confrontation Clause applies to trial testimony, not sentencing). Furthermore, the court did *339not rely on conjecture or evidence from other cases to conclude that Deras-Elias “must have béen involved in many more loads.” Rather, the court found that, on at least one of Deras-Elias’s 11 border crossings in the month before her arrest, she had transported drugs. This finding was not clearly erroneous, given the government’s representation, to which Deras-Eli-as did not object, that Deras-Elias had admitted during her safety valve debrief to at least one prior drug crossing. *See United States v. Hinkson,*585 F.3d 1247, 1262 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (a finding is clearly erroneous only if it is illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences from the record). In light of this admission and the totality of the circumstances, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the adjustment. *See*U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS22-03]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:                

*Location:*                     This will be a virtual meeting via Zoom. Please visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the What's New box. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.                

*Date:*                     March 9, 2022.                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. ET.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

Reports

Chairman

Executive Director

Grants Director

Financial Manager

Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes

December 8, 2021 Special Meeting Minutes

Amendment to FY22 ASC Budget

7-Hour National USPAP Update Course

Selection of ASC Vice Chair

*How to Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting:*                     The meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the What's New box. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.                

James R. Park,

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2022-04166 Filed 2-25-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000160

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

AS TRUSTEE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO

LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BEAR STERNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 1 LLC,

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HE7, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JAMES C. ACOB, Defendant-Appellant, and

JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS,

CORPORATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC151000671)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears we lack appellate

jurisdiction over self-represented Defendant-Appellant

James C. Acob's (Acob) appeal from the underlying case, Civil

No. 1CC151000671, because the appeal is untimely.

On February 7, 2022, the Circuit Court of the First

Circuit (circuit court) entered a final, appealable judgment

(Judgment). See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 641-1(c)

(2016) & 667-51(a)(1) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure

(HRCP) Rule 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright,

76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994). Acob's

December 22, 2021 HRCP Rule 59(e) "Motion for Reconsideration or

New Trial" (Motion to Reconsider) extended the deadline to file

the notice of appeal from the Judgment until 30 days after

issuance of an order disposing of the Motion to Reconsider. See

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000160

09-JUN-2022

08:10 AM

Dkt. 10 ODSLJ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(3); HRCP

Rule 59(e); Saranillio v. Silva, 78 Hawai i 1, 7, 889 P.2d 685,

691 (1995); Buscher v. Boning, 114 Hawai i 202, 221, 159 P.3d

814, 833 (2007). The order denying the Motion to Reconsider was

entered on February 14, 2022. The 30-day deadline to file a

notice of appeal from the Judgment was March 16, 2022. Acob's

notice of appeal was not filed until March 18, 2022, after the

deadline expired.

The failure to file a timely notice of appeal in a

civil matter is a jurisdictional defect that the parties cannot

waive and the appellate courts cannot disregard in the exercise

of judicial discretion. Bacon v. Karlin, 68 Haw. 648, 650, 727

P.2d 1127, 1128 (1986); HRAP Rule 26(b) ("[N]o court or judge or

justice is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements

contained in Rule 4 of [the HRAP]."); HRAP Rule 26(e) ("The

reviewing court for good cause shown may relieve a party from a

default occasioned by any failure to comply with these rules,

except the failure to give timely notice of appeal.").

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 9, 2022.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge 

2
#### Olga Yolanda REYES-BERCIAN Petitioner v. *468Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III,1 Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 16-3197

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 6, 2017

Filed: July 21, 2017

Lauren Schmoke, Kasaby & Nicholls, Omaha, NE, for Petitioner

Karen Yolanda Drummond, Jenny Lee, Carl H. McIntyre, Briena Strippoli, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

1

. Jefferson B. Sessions, III has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Olga Reyes-Bercian petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the decision of an immigration judge that denied Reyes’s application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention against Torture.2 Our review of the record satisfies us that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief. See De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379 (8th Cir. 2013). The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. Reyes’s asylum claim is not before this panel.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6287 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6287

  To extend the requirement to staff Department of Defense Education 
    Activity schools to maintain maximum student-to-teacher ratios.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2023

 Mr. Bacon (for himself and Mr. Jackson of North Carolina) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
    Services, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the 
 Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the requirement to staff Department of Defense Education 
    Activity schools to maintain maximum student-to-teacher ratios.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Success for Military Connected 
Students Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. STAFFING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY SCHOOLS TO 
              MAINTAIN MAXIMUM STUDENT-TO-TEACHER RATIOS.

    Section 589B(c) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283; 134 Stat. 
3659) is amended by striking ``2023-2024 academic year'' and inserting 
``2029-2030 academic year''.
                                 <all>
```
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

DATE: February 17, 2022

CASE OF: IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE 4-13.4 OF THE 

RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT RELATING TO 

ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR

DOCKET NO.: SC21-187

OPINION FILED: February 10, 2022

ATTENTION: ALL PUBLISHERS

THE FOLLOWING CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE IN THE 

ABOVE OPINION:

On page 1, last line, “LL.M.” was changed to LL.B.”

SIGNED: OPINION CLERK
|                                       |        |                                       |        |                        |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Name of Business                      |   | Doing Business As                     |   | State of Incorporation |
|                                  |   |                                  |   |                   |
| Metro Bank                            |   | Metro Bank                            |   | Pennsylvania           |
|                                  |   |                                  |   |                   |
| Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust I   |   | Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust I   |   | Delaware               |
|                                  |   |                                  |   |                   |
| Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust II  |   | Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust II  |   | Delaware               |
|                                  |   |                                  |   |                   |
| Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust III |   | Commerce Harrisburg Capital Trust III |   | Delaware               |
|                                  |   |                                  |   |                   |
|  MB DPC Holdings 1, LLC          |   |  MB DPC Holdings 1, LLC          |   | Pennsylvania           |