alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                         1997          1996     
                                                    -------------   ------------
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
Net income......................................      $1,587,927      $929,322
                                                                              
Adjustments for reduction in interest                                         
   expense and effects of shares                                              
   required to pay offering costs,                                            
   and debt of $11,527,000......................              --       213,000
                                                       ---------     ---------
                                                                              
Net income......................................       1,587,927              
                                                       =========
Pro forma net income............................                     1,142,322
                                                                     =========
                                                                              
Average number of common shares outstanding.....       5,347,431     3,077,649
Common equivalent shares outstanding............         282,811       427,390
Shares included in the offering.................              --     2,169,636
                                                       ---------     ---------
Weighted average number of common and                
   common equivalent shares outstanding.........       5,630,242              
                                                       =========              
Pro forma weighted average number of common                                   
   and common equivalent shares outstanding.....                     5,674,675
                                                                     =========
Net income per share............................           $0.28              
                                                       =========              
Pro forma net income per share..................                         $0.20
                                                                     =========
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Lead Exposure and Prevention Advisory Committee (LEPAC); Notice 
of Recharter

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of recharter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the Lead Exposure and Prevention Advisory 
Committee (LEPAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year 
period through January 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Allwood, Ph.D., MPH, RS, 
Designated Federal Officer, Branch Chief, National Center for 
Environmental Health, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341, telephone (770) 488-6774; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e7e6f42425941414a6e4d4a4d00494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e5e4f62627961616a4e6d6a6d20696178">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-03865 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
James Michael GAY and Larry Gene Gay v. Robert Howard GAY and Howard Wayne Gay

2160514

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sup. Ct. for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
#### SCHNITZER STEEL PRODUCTS CO., a corporation, Appellant, v. AMTRO CORPORATION, S.A., a Panamanian corporation, and Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda., as owner of the S.S. NICTRIC, Appellees. AMTRO CORPORATION, S.A., a Panamanian corporation, Cross-Appellant, v. SCHNITZER STEEL PRODUCTS CO., a corporation, and Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda., as Owner of the S.S. NICTRIC, Cross-Appellees.

No. 20526.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1966.

Gunther F. Krause, Carl R. Neil, of Krause, Lindsay & Nahstoll, Portland, Or., for appellant-cross appellee Schnitzer Steel Products Co.

Lofton L. Tatum, of Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser & Brooke, Portland, Or., for appellee Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda.

Alex L. Parks, of Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty, Parks & Templeton, Portland, Or., Robert A. Fletcher, of Fletcher & Rauch, Los Angeles, Cal., for appelleecross-appellant Amtro Corp., S. A.

Before POPE, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have before us appeals from a final decree in admiralty rendered in the court below. The trial judge stated his findings and conclusions in an opinion reported under the title Cia. Estrella Blanca, Ltda. v. S.S. Nictric, D.C., 247 F.Supp. 161.

This court is of the view that the opinion of the trial court correctly disposed of all issues in the case. Accordingly, the decree is affirmed for the reasons and on the grounds stated in the district court’s opinion.
Michael BOYINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2018

Patrick Michael Megaro and Joseph Easton of Halscott Megaro, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Robert Lee, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis ALVARADO-MANRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50010

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

Filed September 29, 2017

Alicia Phillip Williams, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong, Assistant U.S. *485Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Luis Alvarado-Manriquez, Pro Se

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges,

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Alvarado-Manriquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for improper entry by an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Alvarado-Manriquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarado-Manriquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
From: Szabo, Aaron

To: Fisher, Brian; Risley, David

Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Interstate Transport Rule for the

 2008 Ozone NAAQS (RIN 2060-AS05)

Date: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:39:39 PM

Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR Update NPR....docx

Attached please find additional summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on

 the draft proposed rule entitled, Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202-395-3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### Demond EASTER, Petitioner-Appellant v. C.V. RIVERA; John Fox, Respondents-Appellees

No. 16-41182 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 11, 2017

Demond Easter, Pro Se

Michael Wayne Lockhart, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before DAVIS, PRADO, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Demond Easter, federal prisoner # 29733-177, filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to challenge officials’ calculation of his time served pursuant to Program Statement 5160.05 (PS 5160.05). The district court denied the petition, and this appeal ensued.

Easter does not pursue his claim concerning PS 5160.05. Rather, he argues that his federal and state sentences should run concurrently under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3. Because this claim was not presented to the district court, we decline to consider it. *See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,*183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999). Additionally, because Easter fails to address the propriety of the district court’s'analysis of his PS 5160.05 claim, he shows no error in the district court’s rejection of this claim. *See Matchett v. Dretke,*380 F.3d 844, 848 (5th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or      78o(d)) and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                              |   |                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
| May 14,      2009                 |   | /s/ David      M. Bradley     |   |
| Dated                                                                                                        |   | David      M. Bradley              |   |
|                                                                                                              |   | Chairman,      President & CEO |   |

----
#### Cedrick SIMPSON Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, a municipality; Greg Siegler, individually and in his official capacity; Does, unidentified employees of the City of Little Rock Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-3521

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: August 3, 2017

Filed: August 9, 2017

Cedrick Simpson, Pro Se

Alexander Julian Betton, City Attorney’s Office, Little Rock, AR, for Defendants-Appellees

*469Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Cedrick Simpson appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to defendants Greg Siegler and the City of Little Rock. His claims arose from his arrest, prosecution, and acquittal in state court.

After carefully reviewing the record, and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis to reverse. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing record in light most favorable to nonmovant). Specifically, we conclude that Simpson’s claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), failed because he was acquitted at trial, see Livers v. Schenck, 700 F.3d 340, 359 (8th Cir. 2012) (no Brady violation where plaintiffs were not convicted); that Simpson’s due process claim failed because there was no evidence in the record that these defendants destroyed potentially exculpatory evidence in bad faith, see Briscoe v. Cty. of St. Louis, 690 F.3d 1004, 1011, 1013 (8th Cir. 2012) (investigating officer violates defendant’s due process rights if officer fails to disclose or preserve potentially exculpatory evidence in bad faith); that any Fourth Amendment claim based on Simpson’s arrest was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, see Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 387-91, 127 S.Ct. 1091, 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007) (for claimant asserting cause of action for allegedly wrongful arrest, statute of limitations begins to run at time claimant becomes detained pursuant to legal process); Jones v. Frost, 770 F.3d 1183, 1185 (8th Cir. 2014) (statute of limitations for § 1983 actions in Arkansas is 3 years); Spirtas Co. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 715 F.3d 667, 670-71 (8th Cir. 2013) (this court can affirm on any basis supported by record); and that Simpson failed to create a genuine issue of material fact as to municipal liability, see Keefe v. City of Minneapolis, 785 F.3d 1216, 1227 (8th Cir. 2015) (city liability requires policy or custom); cf. Ulrich v. Pope Cty., 715 F.3d 1054, 1061 (8th Cir. 2013) (failure-to-train pleading standard). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Report of Travelstar, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
for the for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Alverson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William Alverson
-------------------------------------
William Alverson
Chief Executive Officer
July 30, 2007
#### Ysidro VALENCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Bryan COLLIER; Charles M. Bell, Warden; Huntsville Classification Committee; Major Butcher; Director Review Committee; Gerald Gulledge, Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees

No. 15-41742 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 1, 2017

Ysidro Valencia, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ysidro Valencia, Texas prisoner # 743105, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act. Valencia has failed to challenge the district court’s determination that his complaint was repetitious. Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction, *Haines v. Kerner,*404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them. *Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Failure to identify an error in the district court’s analysis is the same as if Valencia had not appealed the judgment. *See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Valencia therefore is not entitled to relief. *See id.*at 748.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                        PFF BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

            EXHIBIT 11.  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED    SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                 SEPTEMBER 30, 1996   SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                                                 -------------------  -------------------
                                                 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S>                                              <C>                  <C>
Net Loss.......................................     $    (4,417)         $    (1,992)
                                                    ===========          ===========
Weighted average number of common shares
 and equivalents outstanding:
   Issued and outstanding......................      19,837,500           19,837,500
   Shares held by the ESOP which have not
     been committed to be released.............      (1,520,875)          (1,540,712)
                                                    -----------          -----------
Weighted average number of common shares
 and equivalents outstanding...................      18,316,625           18,296,788
                                                    ===========          ===========
Loss per share.................................     $     (0.24)         $     (0.11)
                                                    ===========          ===========

</TABLE>

Earnings (loss) per share is meaningful only for the three and six months ended
September 30, 1996, since the Company's common stock was issued March 28, 1996
in connection with the conversion of the Bank from the mutual to stock form of
ownership.


                                       1

<PAGE>
 
                        PFF BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                                   SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                      PFF BANCORP, INC.


      November 13, 1996               /s/ LARRY M. RINEHART
--------------------------------      -----------------------------
            Date                      Larry M. Rinehart
                                      President, Chief Executive Officer
                                      and Director



       November 13, 1996              /s/ GREGORY C. TALBOTT
--------------------------------      -----------------------------------
            Date                      Gregory C. Talbott
                                      Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                      Officer and Treasurer

                                       

                                       2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40012 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed July 21, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Kayla R. Gassmann, Scott Andrew Martin, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Medina appeals his guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), *262(b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He asserts that the factual basis for his guilty plea was inadequate because the Government failed to meet its obligation to prove that he had knowledge of the particular type and quantity of controlled substance involved in his offense.

As Medina concedes, his argument is foreclosed by *United States v. Betancourt,*586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that *Flores-Figueroa v. United States,*556 U.S. 646, 129 S.Ct. 1886, 173 L.Ed.2d 853 (2009), did not overturn *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695 (5th Cir. 2003), and that the Government is not required to prove knowledge of the drug type and quantity as an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 drug offense. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *262published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International D rive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8708

Matthew J. Clark

703.336. 8714 Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com September 2 0 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Delivery of Operating Documents (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3167 )

To Whom it May Concern :

As you are aware, this office represents University of Iowa regar ding the above

- referenced

Petition for Exemption, in which University of Iowa seeks regulatory relief to allow commercial

operation of small unmanned aircraft system. Please accept this letter as confirmation that

University of Iowa operating documents were submitted electronicall y via e

- mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov

.

If you have any questions or require any additional information to process the University of

Iowa Petition, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very trul y yours,

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for University of Iowa

.