alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin McCarthy, the President and Chief Executive Officer of PFF Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), in connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the Report), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o (d)) and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                    
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|February 20, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin McCarthy                                                 
|Dated             |  |  |  | Kevin McCarthy                                                     
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or      78o(d)) and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 14,      2010                 | /s/ Jane M. Funk                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated                                                                                                             | Jane      M. Funk                         |
|                                                                                                              | Chief      Financial Officer andTreasurer |

----
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 17 
 TO THE 

AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF 
 FIRST POTOMAC REALTY INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 This Amendment No. 17
(the “Seventeenth Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of First Potomac Realty Investment Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) dated September 15, 2003 (the “Partnership
Agreement”), is entered into as of January 6, 2012, by and among First Potomac Realty Trust, the general partner (the “General Partner”) of the Partnership, Hugo A. Schiattareggia (“Transferor”) and Nancy P.
Schiattareggia (“Surviving Spouse” or “Transferee”). All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Partnership Agreement. 

WHEREAS, Transferor is a Limited Partner of the Partnership and the owner of 500 Partnership Units; 

WHEREAS, the General Partner has received notice and evidence from the administrators of Transferor’s estate that the Transferor
died on January 6, 2011, and that the Transferor’s estate wishes to transfer Transferor’s Partnership Units to his Surviving Spouse; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.01 of the Partnership Agreement Transferor wishes to transfer 500 Partnership Units to Transferee and Transferor has requested the General Partner’s consent to the
Transfer; 
 WHEREAS, Transferee accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions of the Partnership Agreement, as
amended; and 
 WHEREAS, it is desirable to amend Exhibit A to the Partnership Agreement to reflect the Transfer. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Partnership
Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Transferee herby accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions of the
Partnership Agreement, as amended. 
 2. The General Partner hereby consents to the transfer of 500 Partnership Units from
Transferor to Transferee and Transferee is hereby admitted as a Limited Partner of the Partnership. The General Partner hereby waives with respect to the Transferee the one-year holding period contained in Section 8.04(a) of the Partnership
Agreement. 
 3. Exhibit A to the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended by substituting for the current version of such
exhibit, a version in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A reflecting the transfer of 500 Partnership Units from Transferor to Transferee.  







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the foregoing Seventh Amendment has been signed and delivered as
of this 6th day of January, 2012, by the parties thereto. 
  

			
	GENERAL PARTNER AND LIMITED PARTNERS, pursuant to Power of Attorney
		
	By:	 	FIRST POTOMAC REALTY TRUST
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joel F. Bonder

		 	    Joel F. Bonder
		 	    Executive Vice President
	
	TRANSFEROR
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gena S. Conte

		 	    Gena S. Conte, Administrator
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Dominic J. Schiattareggia

		 	    Dominic J. Schiattareggia, Administrator
	
	TRANSFEREE
		
		 	 /s/ Nancy P. Schiattareggia

		 	    Nancy P. Schiattareggia
#### Mengistu TAYE, Petitioner, v. Dana James BOENTE, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2079

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2017

Decided: February 2, 2017

Mengistu Taye, Petitioner Pro Se. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jessica Eden Burns, Jane Tracey Schaffner, Claire L. Workman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mengistu Taye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order *837of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(c)(2) (2016). We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Taye (B.I.A. Sept. 7, 2016). We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen and therefore dismiss this portion of the petition for review. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400-01 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 'the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT IN THE INTEREST OF: S.K., A MINOR PETITION OF: S.K., MOTHER : : : : : No. 444 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
J.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2683

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

J.M., a juvenile, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Morris C. Smith, Appellant. Charles W. Froessel, Individually and as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Argued February 23,1943;

decided April 8, 1943.

*696
      *Frederick E. Crane, Alexander A. Mayper*and *David Lazarus*for appellant.

*Fred*J. *Munder,*individually and as District Attorney *(Harry C. Brenner*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. (See 290 N. Y. 859.)

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Finch, Rippey and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Loughran, Lewis and Conway, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 99.1  Press Release



PRESS RELEASE
January 5, 1998

                      For more information contact:
                      David M. Bradley
                      Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
                      North Central Bancshares, Inc.
                      825 Central Avenue
                      Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
                      515-576-7531

    NORTH CENTRAL BANCSHARES, INC. ACQUISITION OF VALLEY SAVINGS BANK, FSB
                   APPROVED BY OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION

Fort Dodge, Iowa, January 5, 1998...North Central Bancshares, Inc.
(NASDAQ/NMS:FFFD) has received approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision
for the acquisition of Valley Financial Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary
Valley Savings Bank, FSB. In connection with the acquisition, Valley Savings
Bank will be merged into First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge, the wholly
owned subsidiary of North Central. The shareholders of Valley Financial
previously approved the transaction at a meeting held in November, 1997.

Mr. David M. Bradley, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of both North Central and First Federal commented, "We are very pleased
to have received both Valley Financial shareholder and bank regulatory approval.
We are confident that the transaction will enhance shareholder value and provide
long-term benefits for our customers and the communities that First Federal and
Valley Savings Bank serve."

The closing of the transaction is scheduled to occur as of the close of business
on January 30, 1998. Each share of Valley Financial common stock outstanding
will be converted into the right to receive cash consideration equal to $525.00
per share. The transaction will be accounted for by First Federal as a purchase
transaction. The branch offices of Valley Savings Bank will be operated as a
separate division of First Federal.

North Central Bancshares, Inc. serves north central Iowa at 4 full service
locations in Fort Dodge, Nevada and Ames, Iowa through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, First Federal Savings Bank of Fort Dodge, headquartered in Fort
Dodge, Iowa. Upon completion of the transaction, North Central will have assets
in excess of $300 million and will operate seven banking offices in southeastern
and north central Iowa. First Federal's deposits are insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company's stock is traded on The Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol "FFFD."
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2012

_____________________________

TONY D. GOODWIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

February 7, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The court dismisses as moot the petition for writ of mandamus

asking us to compel the trial court to rule on two pending 

motions. The trial court has given the petitioner a ruling on the 

motions. 

ROWE, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Tony D. Goodwin, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau 

Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Fidencio Alejandro REYES-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40088 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

*376Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, .Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Fidencio Alejandro Reyes-Garda, Pro Se ,

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fidencio Alejandro Reyes-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Garda has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Manuel Ramiro MARTINEZ-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41673 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 22, 2017

' John Richard Berry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S^ Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, John Moreno Parras, Kathryn She-phard, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM; *

Manuel Ramiro Martinez-Rivera pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the country after he was deported, and he received a 57-month sentence. On appeal, Martinez-Rivera contends that the district court erred by imposing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(a)(1)(A)(ii) (2015) based on a finding that his prior Texas aggravated assault conviction was a crime *170of violence. We review this determination de novo. *United States v. Alay,*850 F.3d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 2017).

Acknowledging that in *United States v. Guillen-Alvarez,*489 F.3d 197, 198 (5th Cir. 2007), this court held that Texas aggravated assault is an enumerated crime of violence for purposes of § 2L1.2(a)(1)(A)(ii) (2015), Martinez-Rivera argues that the court’s conclusion has been called into question by the reasoning of other circuit courts. However, one panel of this court may not overrule the decision of another absent an intervening change in the law, for instance through a superseding decision of the Supreme Court or this court sitting en banc. *United States v. Traxler,*764 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir. 2014). Moreover, this court has recently reaffirmed the holding in *Guillen-Alvarez. United States v. Shepherd,*848 F.3d 425, 428 (5th Cir. 2017).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
LAURIE GLISSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3982

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

.

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee , for

Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Gener al, David Campbell and Virginia Harris, Assis tant

Attorneys General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

PADOVANO, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Oleg G. PODGORETSKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; Poore Substitute Trustee, Ltd, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1038

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 11, 2017

Decided: May 19, 2017

Oleg G. Podgoretsky, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Oleg G. Podgoretsky appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Podgoretsky v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC,*No. 1:16-cv-01255-CMH-JFA, 2016 WL 7217182 (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### In the Matter of Clifton G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 621]

*427Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of gang assault in the first degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly considered by the court and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The eyewitness’s testimony was credible and was corroborated by appellant’s own statement. The credible evidence established that appellant was part of a group of five persons, each of whom actively participated in the assault on the victim *(see People v Kim, 255*AD2d 337 [1998]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Victor BREWER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1499

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 02, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,688,391
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      513,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,644,932
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   115,700
<PP&E>                                             329,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,305,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,624,005
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            47,133
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,874,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,305,728
<SALES>                                            567,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   567,223
<CGS>                                              247,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      247,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,438,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 143,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,262,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,262,465)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Paris Lee PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1718

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or                78o(d)) and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                14, 2008 |   |                                                 | /s/                Kyle C. Cook |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Dated                            |   | Kyle                C. Cook                          |
|                             |   | Chief                Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
#### William Smith and Others, Overseers of the Poor of the Town of Boston, Complainants, *versus*Isaac Hubbard.

From an order of the Common Pleas, for discharging an apprentice, pursuant to the statute of 1793, c. 59, § 5, no appeal lies to this Court.

At the last term of the Circuit Court of Common Pleas in this county, the complainants obtained a judgment against the said *Hubhard,*that *Julia Ann Griffin,*a minor,,and an apprentice, bound to the said *Hubbard,*according to the provisions of the *“*Act for the relief and support, employment * and re- [ * 25 ] moval, of the poor,” &c., (1) for the abuse, ill-treatment, and neglect, of the said Hubbard, should be liberated and discharged from her said master. From this judgment *Hubbard*appealed to this Court: and neglecting to enter and prosecute his appeal, the complainants filed their complaint praying for affirmation, &c.

(1)

*Stat.*1793, c. 59, § 4.

But *the Court,*

upon looking into the statute, were of opinion that no appeal lay in the case. So the complainants took nothing by their complaint, *(a)*

(a)

*Inhab. Nantucket*vs. *Cotton,*14 *Mass. Rep.*242.