alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6370 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6370

 To require the Office of Foreign Assets Control to develop a program 
   under which private sector firms may receive a license to conduct 
      nominal financial transactions in furtherance of the firms' 
                investigations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2023

Mrs. Beatty (for herself and Mr. Nunn of Iowa) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in 
   addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Office of Foreign Assets Control to develop a program 
   under which private sector firms may receive a license to conduct 
      nominal financial transactions in furtherance of the firms' 
                investigations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``OFAC Licensure for Investigators 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SENDING AND RECEIVING OF NOMINAL AMOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the Office of Foreign Assets 
Control shall, not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of 
this section, establish a pilot program under which a private sector 
firm may receive a license to conduct nominal financial transactions in 
furtherance of the firm's investigations.
    (b) Coordination.--When establishing and carrying out the pilot 
program required under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of 
Foreign Assets Control shall coordinate with the Director of the 
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for the purposes of supporting 
activities of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Exchange, as 
described in section 310(d) of title 31 of the United States Code.
    (c) Reporting on Activities.--Each private sector firm that 
receives a license described under subsection (a) shall submit a 
detailed monthly report to the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets 
Control on the activities of the firm conducted under such license.
    (d) Termination.--The pilot program established by the Director of 
the Office of Foreign Assets Control under subsection (a) shall 
terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date on which the 
Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control establishes such 
program.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Russel Calcagno et al., Appellants, against Town Board of Webster et al., Respondents.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 22, 1943.

Motion for a certificate that a constitutional question is directly involved granted. [Reported below, 265 App. Div. 687.]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo MALDONADO-NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51228 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 13, 2017

*291Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Arturo Maldonado-Nunez, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo Maldonado-Nunez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maldonado-Nunez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of MDU Communications International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2008 (the “Report”),
I, Sheldon Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  SHELDON
      NELSONSheldon
      NelsonChief
      Executive Officer and
              Chief
      Financial OfficerMDU
      Communications International, Inc.December
      23, 2008Totowa,
      New Jersey





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
and will be retained by MDU Communications International, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.02

                 SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                  Years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Additions
                                       --------------------
                            Balance at Charged to                 Write-offs
   Allowance for Doubtful   Beginning  Costs and                    Net of   Balance at
   Accounts                  of Year    Expenses     Other        Recoveries End of Year
   ----------------------   ---------- ----------   -------       ---------- -----------
   <S>                      <C>        <C>          <C>           <C>        <C>
   2000....................  $ 1,627    $ 3,035     $   789(2)      $ 974      $ 4,477
   1999....................      --       1,121       1,103(1)        597        1,627
   1998....................      --         --          --            --           --

<CAPTION>
   Valuation Allowance for
   Deferred Tax Assets
   -----------------------
   <S>                      <C>        <C>          <C>           <C>        <C>
   2000 (Restated).........  $16,570    $42,261(4)  $15,780(2)(3)   $ --       $74,611
   1999....................      929      1,756      13,885(1)        --        16,570
   1998....................      928          1         --            --           929
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Balances acquired from the NSI Reorganization and acquisitions.

(2) Balances acquired from acquisitions.

(3) Balances will be credited to equity upon reduction of valuation allowances.

(4) Previously reported amount of $29,718 was restated to reflect the
    restatement of certain transactions recorded in the year 2000. For
    discussion of the restatement, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial
    statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frank KRIEGBAUM, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51196 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed July 19, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mara Asya Blatt, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Frank Kriegbaum pleaded guilty to receiving and possessing an ■ unregistered firearm and was sentenced to 96 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Kriegbaum argued that the district court erroneously calculated both his criminal history score *374and his offense level, which was based on an allegedly erroneous determination that Kriegbaum’s Texas robbery conviction qualified as a crime of violence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Upon the Government’s concession that Kriegbaum’s criminal history score was incorrect, this court vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing. On remand, the district court- imposed a sentence of 96 months’ imprisonment.

Kriegbaum again appeals, arguing that the district court incorrectly calculated his base offense level under U.S-.S.G. § 2K2.1 because his Texas robbery conviction is not a crime of violence. For purposes of § 2K2.1, the term “crime of violence” has the same meaning as in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a) (2015) and Application Note 1 of the Commentary to § 4B1.2. § 2K2.1, comment, (n.l) (2015). Kriegbaum contends that Texas robbery is a crime of violence only under the residual clause of former § 4B1.2'(a)(2), which is unconstitutionally vague because it contains the same language as the provision of the Armed Career Criminal Act invalidated for vagueness in *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015).

In *Bedeles v. United States,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 886, 897, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017), the Supreme Court held that “the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to á due process vagueness challenge” and that therefore, “[former] § 4B1.2(a)’s residual clause is not void for vagueness.” *Bedeles*forecloses Kriegbaum’s only argument on appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT the Government’s motion for summary affirmance. AFFIRM the judgment of the district court, and DENY as moot the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>
 
                        PFF BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

          EXHIBIT 11.  STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              PRIMARY                                   FULLY DILUTED
                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED     THREE MONTHS ENDED     NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                              DECEMBER 31, 1996      DECEMBER 31, 1996     DECEMBER 31, 1996      DECEMBER 31, 1996
                                              (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)     (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S>                                             <C>                     <C>                    <C>                   <C>
 
Net Earnings..............................      $     2,216             $       224            $     2,216           $       224
                                                ===========             ===========            ===========           ===========
                                              
Weighted average number of common shares      
 and equivalents outstanding:                 
                                              
Issued and outstanding....................       19,837,500              19,837,500             19,837,500            19,837,500
                                              
Less:                                         
Unearned ESOP shares and shares held          
 by benefit plans.........................       (1,756,535)             (1,651,959)            (1,756,535)           (1,651,959)
                                              
                                              
Add:                                          
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive      
 effect of stock options..................           80,963                  26,987                205,146                68,382
                                                -----------             -----------            -----------           -----------
                                              
Weighted average number of common shares      
 and equivalents outstanding..............       18,161,928              18,212,528             18,286,111            18,253,923
                                                ===========             ===========            ===========           ===========
                                              
Earnings per share........................      $      0.12             $      0.01            $      0.12           $      0.01
                                                ===========             ===========            ===========           ===========
</TABLE>

Earnings per share is meaningful only for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 1996, since the Company's common stock was issued March 28, 1996 in
connection with the conversion of the Bank from the mutual to stock form of
ownership.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Grode MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7676

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: April 28, 2017

Lorenzo Grode Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Grode Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6434 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6434

To require the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to 
publish an annual Financial Trend Analysis describing illicit financial 
 schemes and methods related to the trafficking of fentanyl and other 
               synthetic opioids, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2023

 Mr. Pfluger (for himself and Ms. De La Cruz) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to 
publish an annual Financial Trend Analysis describing illicit financial 
 schemes and methods related to the trafficking of fentanyl and other 
               synthetic opioids, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combating Fentanyl and Financial 
Crimes Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL CRIMES ENFORCEMENT NETWORK REPORT REQUIREMENT TO 
              PUBLISH A FINANCIAL TREND ANALYSIS DESCRIBING ILLICIT 
              FINANCIAL SCHEMES AND METHODS RELATED TO THE TRAFFICKING 
              OF FENTANYL AND OTHER SYNTHETIC OPIOIDS.

    (a) Report Requirement.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this section and annually thereafter for 5 years, the 
Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network shall publish, and 
make available on the website of the Financial Crimes Enforcement 
Network, a Financial Trend Analysis describing illicit financial 
schemes and methods related to the trafficking of fentanyl and other 
synthetic opioids.
    (b) Distribution to Financial Institutions.--The Director shall 
distribute the analysis described in subsection (a) to financial 
institutions (as defined in section 5312(a) of title 31, United States 
Code).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114496, 333-121039,and 333-128547 on Form S-3 and No. 333-116014 and 333-122716 on Form S-8 of Gasco Energy, Inc.(“Gasco”) of our reports dated February 29, 2008 relating to our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Gasco for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Hein & Associates LLP***HEIN****& ASSOCIATES LLP*Denver, Colorado
SYMC-LRCRenewal2012_Ex10.4




Exhibit 10.4









AMENDMENT ONE TO THE STATEMENT OF WORK FOR THE HOSTING OF ONLINE RENEWALS FOR LICENSE RENEWAL CENTER (LRC) & MYSYMANTEC.COM FOR NAM BETWEEN SYMANTEC CORPORATION AND RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.


This Amendment One (“Amendment One”) is made to the Statement of Work for the Hosting of Online Renewals for License Renewal Center (LRC) & MySymantec.com for NAM with an effective date of November 1, 2009, by and between Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) and Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (“Rainmaker”), as amended (“SOW”).  Terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment One shall have the meaning as defined in the SOW. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment One and the SOW, the terms of this Amendment One shall govern. 


WHEREAS, Symantec and Rainmaker entered into a Master Services Agreement dated June 29, 2006, as amended (the “Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, Symantec and Rainmaker entered into the SOW pursuant to the terms of the Agreement; and


WHEREAS, Symantec and Rainmaker desire to amend the SOW effective as of April 1, 2012 (“Amendment One Effective Date”).


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby amend the SOW as follows:    


1.    Commencement/Term/Territory.  The new expiration date of the SOW shall be March 31, 2014.


2.    No Other Modifications.  Except as modified by this Amendment One, the terms of the SOW remain in full force and effect.  


* * * * * * * *


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment One as of the Amendment One Effective Date above, and each party warrants that its respective signatory whose signature appears below is duly authorized by all necessary and appropriate corporate action to execute this Amendment One on behalf of such party.


    
	
								
	RAINMAKER SYSTEMS, INC.:
	 
	 
	SYMANTEC CORPORATION:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ TIMOTHY BURNS
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ HENRI ISENBERG

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Name:
	Timothy Burns
	 
	 
	Name:
	Henri Isenberg

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Title:
	CFO
	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	Vice President
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	3/12/2012
	 
	 
	 
	Date:
	3/9/2012
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 170 (Friday, August 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 53248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21569]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8005]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Mantegna to Matisse: Master Drawings From The 
Courtauld Gallery''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Mantegna to Matisse: Master Drawings From 
The Courtauld Gallery,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Frick Collection in New York, New York from on 
or about October 1, 2012, until on or about January 27, 2013, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 22, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21569 Filed 8-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```