alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dorothy F. L. Jones, Respondent, *v.*Union Central Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Argued May 18, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

*885
      *James F. Hubbell*for appellant.

*Moses*G. *Hubbard, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                   THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AS AMENDED

     In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Capital Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Walter W. Buckley, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Walter W. Buckley, III
-------------------------------------
Walter W. Buckley, III
Chief Executive Officer and President
March 16, 2007
#### LEOSO and ATOFAU, Plaintiffs v. NERI (Edward Ripley, Sr.), Defendant

No. 17-1918

High Court of American Samoa Civil Jurisdiction, Trial Division

Date unknown

A. STRONACH, *President of the High Court*

JUDGMENT

This case coming on to be heard by the High Court and it appearing to the High Court that the defendant purchased the land in controversy from a native chief, MATUU about thirty years ago for the sum of $60.00, which sum was paid by him, and it further appearing to the Court that the defendant is a foreigner and that he did not comply with Codification, Section 44, as to Registration of Land by persons other than Samoans and that therefore the land cannot now be registered by him; It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the rightful title to the land in controversy is vested in MATUU, the native proprietor, from whom the land was purchased and those persons who are rightfully entitled to stand in his place, if he be dead, and that such native proprietor or those entitled under him shall pay to the said defendant the sum of $60.00 with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from January 1st, 1887 until said sum is paid and that until the payment of said sum with interest said defendant shall retain possession of said land and shall have an equitable lien upon the same for the payment of the sum above named with interest.

*297It is further ordered and adjudged that the plaintiffs Atofau and Leoso pay $10.00 costs and that the defendant pay $10.00 costs.
Demetrice A. MCNEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-5765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1

 

Amended and Restated

Project 500 Program

 

PROJECT 500 AWARDS UNDER

SIX FLAGS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Overview

 

The objective of the Project 500 Awards under the Six Flags Entertainment Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Project 500 Awards”) is to provide management with an equity incentive to achieve $500 million of Modified EBITDA in a calendar year (the “EBITDA Target”) by December 31, 2015.  An aggregate of 1,400,000 shares would be issued if the EBITDA Target is achieved in calendar 2015, to the extent provided in the applicable Project 500 Awards agreement.

 

The Project 500 Awards provide management with incentive to reach the EBITDA Target earlier by providing:  (a) a 15% early achievement bonus (1,610,000 total shares) if the EBITDA Target is met for calendar year 2014, (b) a 35% early achievement bonus (1,890,000 total shares) if the EBITDA Target is met for calendar year 2013 and (c) a 50% early achievement bonus (2,100,000 total shares) if the target EBITDA is met for calendar year 2012, all to the extent provided in the applicable Project 500 Awards agreement.

 

A minimum achievement hurdle of 95% ($475 million) applies and any overperformance above $475 million would be credited to the immediately subsequent calendar year.

 

The terms and conditions of the Project 500 Awards are set forth in a separate Project 500 Awards agreement that shall apply in the event of any conflict with this Overview.
EX PARTE Julius MCLEOD, Jr.

CR-16-0682

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Byron K. Huffman, Acting Director 

FAA -Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Byron: 

All of the Idaho State Aviation fuel taxes (6 cents/gal. jet fuel, 7 cents/gal. avgas) go to support 

the Division of Aeronautics. None of the money goes to; the State General Fund, or general 

support of lTD, or the lTD Director, or anything similar. 

All aviation fuel tax revenue collected is used by the Aeronautics Division for: 

• Administrative costs, 

• Aeronautics Advisory Board travel and meeting expenses, 

• General aviation search and rescue operations, 

• Aviation safety & education programs, 

• State-owned and operated airport maintenance programs, 

• Airport planning, 

• Matching of FAA grants to local entities 

There is an Idaho state aircraft operation that is financed by a chargeback system from the 

users and thus self-supported. 

Based on that above structure here in Idaho, I am confident that the State of Idaho complies 

with the rules of the FAA Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue. 

If you require any additional information please contact me at my office. 

* MichaelS. Pape Administrator 

Idaho Division of Aeronautics 

3483 Rickenbacker 

Boise, ID 83705 

208-334-8788 office 

208-830-9624 mobile
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00007

- CR

A LFONZO B UTLER

, J R

. , Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1698886D )

September 7 , 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the tri al court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ / s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Curtis J. Parker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge, Cotelligent, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cotelligent, Inc.



|                  
|------------------
|Date: May 14, 2003
|
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50204 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO JAVIER RUBIO-GALVAN, also known as Jorge Armando Serrano, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-02-CR-1643-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Javier Rubio-Galvan appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rubio-Galvan contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 03-50204 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Rubio-Galvan maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Rubio-Galvan acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                       OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB
                         OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 2003

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
(the "Issuer"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2003.

I, John D. Bair, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Issuer.

This certification is executed as of August 12, 2003.

                                /s/ John D. Bair
                                -------------------------
                                Chief Executive Officer

                                      -25-
#### Francisco Alexander Calderon QUINTANILLA, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-71724

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 15, 2017

Javier Lopez-Perez, Esquire, Attorney, Lopez Perez Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, Salomon Zavala, Attorney, Zavala Law Group, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Robert Michael Stalzer, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Alexander Calderon Quintan-illa, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying a continuance, and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance. *Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Calderon Quintanilla’s motion for a continuance where he failed to show eligibility for any relief, and it was undisputed that he was ineligible for status adjustment. *See Id.*at 1247 (no abuse of discretion where no relief was immediately available to the petitioner); 8 C.F.R § 1003.29 (IJ has authority to grant continuance upon showing of good cause).

Calderon Quintanilla failed to raise, and has therefore waived, any challenge to the BIA’s denial of his motion to remand. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, *2971259 (9th Cir. 1996) (“an issue referred to in the appellant’s statement of the ease but not discussed in the body of the opening brief is deemed waived.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carl Vernie MOORE, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 24, 2018

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
     BALANCE  SHEET  AT  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997  AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF
     OPERATIONS  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FOUND ON PAGES 3-5
     OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,344,576
<SECURITIES>                                       249,140
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,102,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120,055
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,962,976
<PP&E>                                             955,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                     581,908
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,429,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              845,623
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           685,715
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,747,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,429,152
<SALES>                                          2,057,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,231,110
<CGS>                                            1,103,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,553,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,582,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,504,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,504,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .24
        


</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6282 

To require a report on detainees in U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or the Office of Refugee 

Resettlement (ORR) custody, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. VASQUEZ (for himself, Ms. BUDZINSKI, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. CRAIG, Mrs. 

RAMIREZ, Ms. SALINAS, Ms. CARAVEO, and Mrs. TRAHAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To require a report on detainees in U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 

or the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) custody, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Humane Account5 ability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6282 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON DHS AND HHS DETAINEES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home4 land Security and the Secretary of Health and Human 

5 Services shall jointly submit to Congress and the Comp6 troller General of the United States a report regarding 

7 detainees in U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 

8 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), or 

9 the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) custody, as the 

10 case may be. Such report shall include information relat11 ing to the following: 

12 (1) All instances of assault or abuse while in 

13 custody either by an officer, staff, or other detainee 

14 that requires medical attention. 

15 (2) All reports of sexual assault on detainees 

16 while in custody, as well as any findings from subse17 quent investigations into each such assault. 

18 (3) All instances of detainee death while in cus19 tody. 

20 (4) The frequency and topic of complaints sub21 mitted by detainees or their families regarding 

22 abuse, sexual assault, staff neglect, staff retaliation, 

23 lack of proper resources or amenities, lack of access 

24 to legal counsel, or death to authorities at detention 

25 centers, as well as any action taken by such authori26 ties to address and remedy such complaints. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6282 IH

1 (b) GAO RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later than 90 

2 days after receipt of the report required under subsection 

3 (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall 

4 submit to Congress a list of recommendations to address 

5 the instances, reports, and complaints included in such re6 port. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 29,2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                MAR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                             2,075
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,075
<PP&E>                            37,980
<DEPRECIATION>                    21,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   235,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            203,558
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                          13,974
<OTHER-SE>                       (11,478)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     235,407
<SALES>                           25,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  25,000
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    261,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                17,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (236,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (236,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                    (236,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.02)

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1331

_____________________________
M ATTHEW L EE R OBINSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

– Original Jurisdiction.

March 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(5)(A).

W OLF , L EWIS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion un der Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Matthew Lee Robinson, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
EX PARTE ROBINSON FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al.

1160311 (2150618)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30612, 333-39068,333-103198, 333-119764, 333-119772, 333-120303 and 333-120304) and on Form S-4 (No. 333-122485) of Blockbuster Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 29, 2005