FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT NOVEMB ER 18 , 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 11644 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 9 9 - 0 0 3 2 3 - C R - K MM U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s N E A L O 'H A R A D A N I E L S , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( N ove m b e r 18, 2005) B efo re D U B IN A , C A RN E S an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: A ppe l l a ntN e a l O ’ H a r aD a ni e l s appe a l s hi s s e nt e nc e of 11 m onths i m pr i s onm e nt , t o be f

ol l ow e d by 38 m onths s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , i m pos e d a f t e rthe2

d is tr ic t c o u rt r e v o k e d h is s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e , p u r s u a n t to 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 3 ( e ) . D ur i ng hi s r e voc a t i on he a r i ng, D a ni e l s a dm i tt e d t o s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e vi ol a t i ons a nd r e que s t e d tha the be s e nt e nc e d t o at e rm of i m pr i s onm e nt , w i thoutat e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , ba s e d on hi s i nabi l i ty , orunw i l l i ngne s s , t o c om pl y w i th the re qu i re m ent s of s up ervi se d rel ea se . T he di stri ctcourtre j ec t ed the re qu es t , af

t er s t a t i ng: “ Y oura r gum e nti s ba s i c a l l y [ tha t ] . . . the m or e uns uc c e s s f ul y ou dem on stra t e t o the [c ] ou rtyou are go i ng t o b e on sup ervi se d rel ea se [, ] the m ore w e ’r e g o in g to r e w a r d y o u b y n o t p u ttin g y o u o n s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e .” O n ap p e a l, D a n ie ls a r g u e s th a t h is s e n te n c e , w h ile le g a l, w a s u n r e a s o n ab le be c aus e : ( 1) he i s a“ tr oubl e d i ndi vi dua l , ” w ho w a s s e xua l l y abus e d a s ac hi l d, suff er s f rom epi l ept i c s ei zure s, has a tt em pt ed sui ci de, and h as se ri ou s s ub st ance abus e pr obl e m s ; a nd ( 2) he c a n s uc c e s s f ul l y c om pl e t e at e rm of

i m pr i s onm e nt , but has di ff i cul ty m ee t i ng the t ec hn i ca l re qu i re m ent s of s up ervi se d rel ea se . H e not es th a t, u n d e r1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t w a s r e q u ir e d to , b u t d id n o t, c o n s id e rh is h is to ry a n d c h ar a c te r is tic s . P r i ort o the S upr e m e C ourt ’ s de c i s i on i n U ni ted Stat es v. B oo ke r , 5 4 3 U . S.

___, 12 5 S . C t . 73 8, 16 0 L . E d. 2d 62 1 (20 05 ), w e r evi ew ed a s ent ence i m po se d af t erre vo ca t i on of supervi se d rel ea se usi ng the “ pl ai nl y unrea sonabl e” st andard set f o r th in 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 7 4 2 ( e ) ( 4 ) . Se e U ni te d State s v . Sc r oggi ns , 910 F . 2d 768, 7693

( 11th C i r . 1990) . A l though the S upr e m e C our ti n B oo ke re xc i s e d § 3742( e ) a nd r e p la c e d th e s ta n d a r d o f r e v ie w w ith a“r e a s o n ab le n e s s ” s ta n d a r d , B oo ke r , 5 4 3 U . S. at__ , 12 5 S . C t . at76 4-66 , thatst andard i s the sa m e a s the “ pl ai nl y unrea sonabl e” s t a nda r d i n § 3742. T he r e f or e , w e w i l l r e vi e w D a ni e l s ’ s s e nt e nc e f or reaso n ab l en ess. U p o n f in d in g th a t th e d e f

e n d a n t v io la te d ac o n d itio n o f s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e , a court , af t erconsi deri ng the fa ct ors s etforth i n § 35 53 (a )( 1), (a )( 2)(B )- (D ), (a )( 4)- ( 7) , m a y r e voke at e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e and r e qui r e the de f

e nda ntt o s e rve i n pr i s on a l l orpa r tof the t e rm of s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e au th o r iz e d b y s ta tu te f o rth e o f f e n s e th a t r e s u lte d in such t erm of supervi se d rel ea se , . . . exce ptthata def endant. . . m ay no tbe re qu i re d t o serve on any s uch revocat i on . . . m ore than 3 ye ar s in p r is o n if

s u c h o f f e n s e is aC la s s B f

e lo n y [ .] 18 U . S . C . § 3583( e ) ( 3) . I n a ddi t i on, “ the c our tm a y i nc l ude ar e qui r e m e nttha tthe de f e nda ntbe pl a c e d on at e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e a f

t e ri m pr i s onm e nt , ” the l e ngth of w hi c h “ s ha l l note xc e e d the t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e author i z e d by st atu t e fo r th e o ffen se th atresu l t ed i n th e o ri g i n al t erm o f su p erv i sed rel ease, l ess any t erm of i m pri sonm entthatw as i m po se d u po n revocat i on of supervi se d re l ea se . ” 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 3(h). C hapt er7 o f the S ent enci ng G ui del i nes, w hi ch gove rns vi ol a t i ons of

s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , c ont a i ns pol i c y s t a t e m e nt s , one of w hi c h, U . S . S . G . § 7B 1. 4, pr ovi de s r e c om m e nde d r a nge s of i m pr i s onm e ntappl i c abl e upon4

r e v o c a tio n . P o lic y s ta te m e n ts a r e m e r e ly a d v is o ry an d th u s , n o n - b in d in g . U ni ted State s v . C ook , 2 9 1 F .3 d 1 2 9 7 , 1 3 0 1 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . I t is e n o u g h if “th e r e is s om e i ndi c a t i on the di s tr i c tc ourtw a s a w a r e of a nd c ons i de r e d [ C hapt e r7 of the gu i del i nes, ] ” U

n i ted S ta tes v. A g u i l la rd , 2 1 7 F .3 d 1 3 1 9 , 1 3 2 0 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . A dd i t i on al l y, the di stri ctcourtm ayi m po se any s ent ence w i thi n the st atut ory m a x im u m . U

ni ted Stat es v. H

of i erka , 8 3 F .3 d 3 5 7 , 3 6 2 - 6 3 ( 1 1 th C ir .1 9 9 6 ) . B ec ause the re cord dem on stra t es that(1) D ani el s’ s s ent ence l egal l y w as i m pos e d; ( 2) the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s r e que s tf

oral onge rt e rm of i m pr i s onm e nt , r a the rtha n a n a ddi t i ona l t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e , w a s ba s e d on i t s he s i t a t i on t o r e w a r d de f e nda nt s w ho a r e uns uc c e s s f ul on s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e ; a nd (3) the di stri ctcourtprop er l y c on si dere d the § 3 55 3(a) fa ct ors, w e c on cl ud e that D ani el s’ s s ent ence w as re as on abl e. A cc ordi ng l y, w e a ff i rm D ani el s’ s s ent ence . A F F I R M E D .