alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.70
 MOVE, INC.
 Amendment to the Executive Retention and Severance Agreement
with James S. Caulfield
 James S. Caulfield
       Diminution of Responsibilities




---



##### 



Code Section 409A
  vesting
  (i)
    
    if the payment or distribution is payable in a lump sum,
your right to receive payment or distribution of such non-exempt deferred
compensation will be
 -2-




---



##### 



delayed until the earlier of your death or the first day of the seventh
month following your separation from service; and(ii)
    
    if the payment or distribution is payable over time, the
amount of such non-exempt deferred compensation that would otherwise be
payable during the six-month period immediately following your separation
from service will be accumulated and your right to receive payment or
distribution of such accumulated amount will be delayed until the earlier of
your death or the first day of the seventh month following your separation
from service, whereupon the accumulated amount will be paid or distributed
to you on such date and the normal payment or distribution schedule for any
remaining payments or distributions will resume.
    MOVE, INC.By:
    
    /s/ W. Michael LongEXECUTIVE/s/ James S. CaulfieldJames S. Caulfield
 -3-
Author: ICF Consulting, Inc; Abt Associates, Inc.

Source: Integrated Planning Model (IPM) Date Created: 6/18/2008 Date Modified: 5/26/2011 Purpose: Contains electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Basecase (pre-policy) IPM run. (CBI)

File Contents: Worksheet Contents ToAbt Contains electricity, coal, and natural gas prices for Basecase (pre-policy) IPM run.

Input Files: External data used in calculations/analysis: None.

FileInfo 1 of 2NERC Level Prices - EPA302ABT_BC_1g
Capacity Price ($/kW-yr) Energy Price (mills/kWh) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 11.62 16.97 39.0957.92 61.46 60.67 52.12 53.18 MRO 0.00 54.0062.28 77.39 35.44 38.28 38.67 40.23 NPCC 0.00 30.6943.3468.87 61.06 62.86 59.17 62.23 RFC 3.8460.64 58.69 74.86 36.45 40.11 40.16 41.53 SERC 14.7832.03 58.24 71.35 41.22 44.16 42.22 43.42 SPP 9.75 12.64 34.21 44.23 42.29 42.90 40.00 41.81 TRE 13.25 17.3243.76 54.62 53.45 53.57 48.33 49.88 WECC 4.52 19.5847.0862.06 48.97 50.06 44.45 45.67

Natural Gas Price ($/MMBtu) Coal Price ($/MMBtu) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 6.33 6.58 6.11 6.39 2.26 2.24 2.02 2.10 MRO 5.86 5.90 5.60 5.91 1.27 1.25 1.26 1.27 NPCC 6.74 7.03 6.56 6.86 2.05 2.03 2.04 2.10 RFC 6.49 6.66 6.18 6.50 1.53 1.53 1.55 1.61 SERC 6.02 6.11 5.85 6.15 1.74 1.72 1.70 1.73 SPP 5.71 5.72 5.43 5.72 1.18 1.14 1.17 1.19 TRE 5.72 5.85 5.52 5.84 1.61 1.55 1.57 1.63 WECC 5.93 6.25 5.75 6.05 1.29 1.29 1.35 1.37

ToAbt 2 of 2
# C ou r t

of A p p e al s

of t h e S t at e of

G e or gi a

A

T L A N T A

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s h e r e b y p a s s e s t h e f o l l o w i n g o r d e r :

A 2 4 A 1 0 9 0

. J

A M E S R I V E R I N S U R A N C E C O M P A

N Y

, I N C

. v

. R

Y A L L

.

U p o n c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e A p p e l l a n t ’ s M o t i o n t o W i t h d r a w A p p e a l i n t h e

a b o v e s t y l e d c a s e

, p u

r s u a n t t o C o u r t o f A p p e a l s R u l e 4 1 ( g )

, i t i s o r d e r e d t

h a t t h e

m o t i o n i s h e r e b y G R

A N T E D

, a n d j u r i s d i c t i o n i s r e l e a s e d b a c k t o t

h e t r i a l c o u r t u p o n

r e c e i p t o f t h i s o r d e r

.

C o u r t o f A p p e al s o f t he S t at e o f G e o r g ia

C l e r k ’ s O f f ice

, A t l an t a,

_ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I ce r t if y t hat t he ab o v e is a t r u e e

x t r a c t f r o m

t he m in u t e s o f t he C o u r t o f A p p e al s o f G e o r gia.

W it n e s s m y s ig n at u r e an d t h e s e

al o f s aid co u r t

he r e t o a f f ix e d t he day a n d

ye ar l as t ab o v e wr it t

e n

.

, C l e r k

. September 30, 2024

09/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,329
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,850
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,625
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    122,884
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,752
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,635
<LOANS>                                        306,794
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 511,231
<DEPOSITS>                                     457,449
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,702
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,299
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,025
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 511,231
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,017
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,022
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   342
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,381
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,244
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,474
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,907
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,467
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,356
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,356
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,814
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,775
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      704
<RECOVERIES>                                       718
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,889
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,889
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Leonardo COMESANAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

Leonardo Comesanas, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Baker v. State*, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (holding that habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an otherwise procedurally-barred or time-barred motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850); *Jenkins v. State*, 6 So.3d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; *Thompson v. State*, 994 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; *Griffin v. State*, 976 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; *Thomas v. State*, 949 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; *Barnard v. State*, 949 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
## Williams , Rene e (OST) i>c>dc°ef ^Ol-'OST-lf^'J - l^SH^ ^ From : tracydow@clowelectric.co m i ^ ' " :',T'r! i Sent : Tuesday , Augus t 17,201 0 8:0 7 A M - - • To : supervisor@town.massena.ny.us ; anicola@twcny.rr.com ; EA S (OST ) Cc : kthomas@flycapeair.co m Subject : Cap e Ai r

M r Gra y I a mwritin g thi s emai l t o le t you r town and villag e kno wtha t thi s flight(s ) fro ml^assen a t o Albanyha s bee n critica l servic e offere d tha t allowe d ou r companie s gro w(Do wElectric , Everythin g Electri c a n Alltec hIntegrations ) i n th e las t year . Wit h8 5 employee s i n th e Nort hCountr y(NC ) manyfro mMassena . Thes e flight s ar e regularl yuse d weekl yt o allo wou r managemen t t o conduc t busines s wit h ou r client s whic har e bot hStat e Agencie s an d Federal . Th e incom e earne d b you r employee s workin g o n Albanyproject s ha s supporte d directl y1 0 t o 1 5 familie s a yea r i n Albanyalone . Thi s w e find a s beneficia l t o brin g fund s t o NC versu s contractor s takin g thes e fund s bac k t o Albany . I ca n easil yge t t o Bosto n fro mSarana c / Lak e Clear j whic hw e hav e no t used . I f w e W

. busines s peopl e ca n ge t fro mMassen a t o othe r part s o f Ne wYor k suc ha s Syracuse , Utica , Binghamton , Rocheste r and Buffal o i t woul d onl yincreas e NC revenu e th e worl d gettin g smalle r an d w e hav e t o sta yi n th e game . I n discussio n wit hmanypassenger s I hav e foun d thes e flight s t o b e busines s relate d mor e tha n recreatio n o r vacation . Wit hth e flight s t o Albany , th e AlbanyAirpor t benefit s alon g wit hther e sid e o f of f sid e busines s suc ha s hotels . Well , I' msur e thes e point s hav e bee n noted , i f yo u ge t a tru e pictur e o f th e pr o and con s the n I thin k tha t Cap e Ai r bring s th e bes t benefi t t o th e Nort hCountry . I f yo u hav e an

yquestion s fee l fre e t o contac t me . I' mheadin g t o Albanythi s a man d flyin g bac k tonigh t t o hav e dine r wit hm yfamily . Afte r 3 separat e clien t meeting s an d checkin g progres s o n 2 projects . "Al l i n a day " Thank s fo r takin g th e tom e t o rea d this . Trac yADo w Operation s Manage r (315 ) 262-5333(c ) Sen t vi a BlackBerr yb yAT& T
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nabor CRUZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-41563 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 21, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plain-' tiff-Appellee

Nabor Cruz-Perez, Pro Se

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

*184PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nabor Cruz-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Perez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as pruz-Perez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities hprein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 23.01
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (Nos. 333-123299, 333-132398,
333-141115, and 333-149533), the iPlace, Inc. 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, iPlace 2000 Stock
Option Plan, ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, eNeighborhoods, Inc. 1998 Stock
Option Plan, QSpace, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-72192), the HomeWrite Incorporated
2000 Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-58510), the Move.com, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
(No. 333-55828), the Homestore.com, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
Homestore.com, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (Nos. 333-54886, 333-46252, 333-89170,
333-113662), the Hessel Group, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan Options Granted Under the Hessel
Group, Inc. 2000 Stock Option and Assumed by Homestore.com, Inc. (No. 333-48582), the
Homestore.com 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Homestore.com 1999 Equity Incentive Plan,
NetSelect 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, SpringStreet 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, NetSelect 1996
Stock Incentive Plan (No. 333-84545), Homestore.com, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (No.
333-89172);(2)
    
    on Form S-3 filing Nos. 333-107963, 333-72746 and 333-61410; and(3)
    
    on Form S-1 filing No. 333-80419
   
 82
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Edmonds v. Edmonds et al.

1. Guardian: bond to secure three wards: action by one: amount oe recovery. When a guardian’s bond is for the benefit of several wards, neither of them is entitled to recover as against the sureties more than one-third, or his *pro rata*share, of the penalty. (Compare *Hooks v. Evans,*68 Iowa, 52, and *Knox v. Kearns, ante,*286.

*Appeal from*Benton, *District Court*— Hon. James D. Giffen, Judge.

Wednesday, December 14.

Action on a guardian’s bond. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the sureties on the bond appeal.

*Nichols dc*Bwrnham, for appellants.

*Gilchrist c&*Haines, for appellee.

Reed, J.

The penalty of the bond sued on is $4,000, and it was given for the benefit of three wards. The sureties pleaded that an action had been brought on the bond by the present guardian of the other two wards, and that there had been a recovery in that action of $3,546.04. The distinct court sustained a demurrer to the division of the answer in *428which those facts were pleaded. The.position urged by counsel for the appellants is, that as there has already been a recovery on the bond for that amount, and as the sureties cannot be held for any greater amount than the penalty, plaintiff is not in any event entitled to recover more than the difference between the penalty and the amount of that'judgment. We held in *Hooks v.*Evans, 68 Iowa, 52, and *Knox v.*Kearns, *ante,*p. 286, (which is the cause in which the former recovery was had,) that when the bond is for the benefit of several wards, and the defalcation is for an amount in excess of the penalty, neither of them is entitled to recover, as against the sureties, more than his *pro rata*share of the penalty. It may be that it follows' logically from that holding that each ward would in such case be entitled to recover the full amount of his *pro rata*share of the penalty, regardless of the fact that the others had already recovered an amount in excess of their share. Rut we need not go into that question, for, if the correctness of that . proposition should be admitted, the ruling of the district court on the demurrer could not be sustained. Plaintiff was seeking to recover, and by the judgment was permitted .to recover, an amount considerably in excess of one-third of the penalty of the bond. Under the division of the answer to which the demurrer was sustained, defendants, while they were not entitled to the full measure of relief demanded, were entitled to some relief against plaintiff’s claim. The demurrer should therefore have been overruled.

The other questions in the case are disposed of in *Knox v.*Kearns, *supra.*Reversed.
Exhibit
        32.2


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Corp of the West (the "Company")
        on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Dale McKinney,
        Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)  The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
   Date:
                  August 4, 2005
              By/s/
                  R. Dale McKinneyR.
                  Dale McKinneyChief
                  Financial Officer
  Return
            to Form 10-Q
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6449 

To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 to 

reauthorize the Office of Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2023 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Ms. SHERRILL, and Mr. PASCRELL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Agriculture Reorganization 

Act of 1994 to reauthorize the Office of Urban Agriculture and Innovative Production. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Robust 

5 Organics and Diets for Urban Communities Everywhere 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘PRODUCE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF OFFICE OF URBAN AGRI8 CULTURE AND INNOVATIVE PRODUCTION. 

9 Section 222 of the Department of Agriculture Reor10 ganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6923) is amended— 

2 

•HR 6449 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(5)(B), by striking ‘‘2023’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘2028’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (d)(1)(C), by striking ‘‘2023’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘2028’’; and 

5 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘$25,000,000 

6 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023’’ and in7 serting ‘‘$50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 

8 through 2028’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Benjamin Leboe, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Asia Payment Systems Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Benjamin Leboe
Benjamin Leboe
Principal Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------



---