alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC

Section 302 Certification

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Stephen P. Villa,
Chief Executive Officer of Muzak Holdings LLC certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Muzak Holdings LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/    STEPHEN P.
VILLA         
|Name: Stephen P. Villa          
|Title:   Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Frederick 
National Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer 
Institute, February 24, 2022, 1:00 p.m. to February 24, 2022, 4:30 
p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 
Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the Federal Register on 
February 4, 2022, FR Doc 2022-02367, 87 FR 6617.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting end time from 
4:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The meeting will now be held from 1:00 p.m. to 
4:00 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: February 14, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-03433 Filed 2-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative
Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC and Charter Communications
Holdings Capital Corporation (the Company) in compliance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify
that, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission:



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   
| 
| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Steven A. Schumm                                            
| |                                                                 
| | Steven A. Schumm                                                
| | Chief Administrative Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
| | April 15, 2003
#### IN RE: Fidel H. PAJARILLO, Debtor, Fidel H. Pajarillo, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-15977

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted November 16, 2016 *

Filed November 22, 2016

Fidel H. Pajarillo, Pro Se, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Kim Gilbert Ebron, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC.

Chris V. Yergensen, Nevada Association Services, Inc., Pro Se, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee Nevada Association Services, Inc.

Steven T. Loizzi, Jr., Alessi & Koenig, LLC, Rancho Las Brisas Master HOA, Pro Se, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee Rancho Las Brisas Master HOA.

Christopher Jorgensen, Lewis Roca Ro-thgerber LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., Recontrust Company, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP.

U.S. Bank NA, Pro Se, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee U.S. Bank N.A.

Matthew David Lamb, Ballard Spahr LLP, Washington, DC, Abran Vigil, Ballard Spahr LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants-Appellees J.P. Morgan Chase *956Bank, N.A., California Reconveyance Company.

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Fidel H. Pajarillo appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing for failure to prosecute his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We review for an abuse of discretion. *In re Fitzsimmons,*920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir. 1990). We vacate and remand.

The district court abused its discretion in dismissing Pajarillo’s bankruptcy appeal because it did not explicitly consider alternative sanctions. *See id.*at 1474 (“[U]nless there are egregious circumstances, the district court must, as the general rule requires, explicitly consider relative fault and alternative sanctions.”); *In re Hill, 775*F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985) (failure to consider alternative sanctions is an abuse of discretion).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Pajarillo’s other arguments on appeal.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  FOR  THE  FISCAL  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999,  FOR
WORDCRUNCHER  INTERNET  TECHNOLOGIES,  INC.  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0001085278
<NAME>                        WORDCRUNCHER INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,055,371
<SECURITIES>                                   1,462,147
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,833,391
<PP&E>                                         1,930,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 195,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,769,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,352,333
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    63
<COMMON>                                       11,891
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,152,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,769,737
<SALES>                                        23,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,355
<CGS>                                          15,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,124,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,929,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,929,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,929,880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.96)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,274
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                   827
<INVENTORY>                                    56,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         16,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       24,049
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,755
<SALES>                                        3,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,376
<CGS>                                          2,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                   791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,188
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .25


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar HUERTA-MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50273

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 2017 *

Filed June 1, 2017

Helen H. Hong; Assistant U.S. Attorney, Benjamin Holley, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Michael Emerson Lasater, Esquire, U.S. Attorney, Office of the US Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

*381Oscar Huerta-Macias, FCIW—Federal Correctional Institution, Salters, SC, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.*See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Huerta-Macias appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Huerta-Macias contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Guidelines. Because Amendment 782 did not lower Huerta-Macias’s Guidelines range, the district court correctly concluded that he was ineligible for a sentence reduction. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); *U.S. v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 673-74 (9th Cir. 2009). Moreover, contrary to Huerta-Macias’s argument, the court could not reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). *See Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 826, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (court may consider the section 3553(a) factors only if it first determines that a reduction is authorized).

In light of Huerta-Macias’s statutory ineligibility for a reduction, his argument that U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause and separation of powers principles is misplaced. In any event, we have previously rejected these contentions. *See United States v. Waters,*771 F.3d 679, 681 (9th Cir. 2014); *United States v. Davis,*739 F.3d 1222, 1225-26 (9th Cir. 2014).

To the extent that Huerta-Macias asks this court to apply the rule of lenity because the drug quantity calculated by the court at his original sentencing was ambiguous, we decline to do so. The record does not reflect any ambiguity in the drug quantity found by the court and, even if it did, claims of sentencing error are not cognizable in a section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. *See Dillon,*560 U.S. at 831, 130 S.Ct. 2683.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Betrese HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1876

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and statement of operations found on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           177,623
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 726,720
<PP&E>                                           126,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                    88,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,488,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              7,285
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             747
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,480,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,488,655
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    819,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (757,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (757,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (757,009)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.6




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Brookfield Properties Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard B. Clark, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









By:
/s/ Richard B. Clark




Richard B. Clark


Chief Executive Officer




March 30, 2011
Cesar MENDEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3407

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 31, 2018

Cesar Mendez, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gross, May and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Carl E. Vogel, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CharterCommunications Holdings, LLC and Charter CommunicationsHoldings Capital Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Reserved];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrants’ fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants’ other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrants’ ability to record,process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 25, 2004   /s/ Carl E. VogelCarl E. Vogel  Chief Executive Officer
#### William Oddy, Respondent, *v.*John B. James, Appellant.

Where a verbal agreement is entered into for the work and labor of one of the parties for a year, to commence *in futuro,*an entry upon the employment, with the acquiescence of the employer, but without a new contract, does not take the case out of the statute of frauds, and the employer is not liable under the contract.

(Argued January 6, 1872;

decided May term, 1872.)

Action to recover a balance claimed to be due under a verbal contract for work and labor.

About the middle of March, 1861, the parties entered into a verbal agreement by which defendant employed plaintiff to superintend his cement works for one year from the first of April then next, for $900. On the 1st of April plaintiff entered upon the employment, took charge of the works and continued his superintendency thereof until August 3d, when he was discharged by defendant. His services for the remainder of the year were offered and refused, defendant claiming the agreement was void under the statute of frauds, and that plaintiff could only recover compensation for the time of actual service.

The court ruled adversely to the claim, and submitted the question, whether there was a new contract, to the jury, who found a verdict for plaintiff, which was affirmed at General Term. *Held,*that plaintiff could not recover under the new contract; there was no evidence to justify the finding of a new contract, and the submission to the jury was, therefore, error.

*686
      */S. L. Sfebbms*for the appellant.

*E. Qoóke for*the respondent.

Lott, Oh. C., reads for reversal.

All concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.