alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the three month period ending March 31, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,324
<SECURITIES>                                    43,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,893
<PP&E>                                           6,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,896)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,141
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,856
<SALES>                                          2,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,392
<CGS>                                              234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (62)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael Edward WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16450

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 16, 2017

Michael Edward Williams, Pro Se

Darren Brenner, Akerman Senterfitt LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Marc James Ayers, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants-Appellees Bank of America, N.A., Countrywide Home Loan, Inc.

Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esquire, Attorney, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, Marc James Ayers, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee Bank of New York Mellon

*328Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esquire, Attorney, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellee Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael Edward Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law violations related to Williams’ mortgage. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations and under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). *Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,*382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Williams’ Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), intentional misrepresentation, and rescission based upon fraud claims because these claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and Williams failed to plead facts demonstrating that equitable tolling should apply. *See*12 U.S.C. § 2614 (RESPA claims under 12 U.S.C. § 2607 are subject to a one-year statute of limitations); 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e) (TILA damages claims are subject to a one-year statute of limitations); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190(3)(d) (fraud claims under Nevada law are subject to a three-year statute of limitations); *see also Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*656 F.3d 1034, 1045 (9th Cir. 2011) (federal standard for equitable tolling); *Howard v. Howard,*69 Nev. 12, 239 P.2d 584, 588-89 (1962) (fraud claim accrues under Nevada law when the defrauded person knows, or could have known through proper diligence, of the fraud).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend because amendment would be futile. *See Gardner v. Martino,*563 F.3d 981, 990 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review and permitting denial of leave to amend where amendment would be futile).

We do not consider issues not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94181A; File No. SR-NYSE-2021-74]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC, 
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a 
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Provisions of Rule 7.35B; Correction

February 15, 2022.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register on February 14, 2022, concerning a Notice of 
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule 
Change To Amend the Provisions of Rule 7.35B. The document contained a 
typographical error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naomi P. Lewis, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, (202) 551-
5400.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 14, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-
03018, on page 8305, in the first column, on the 47th line, on the 
first line under the heading ``SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'' 
correct the reference to ``Release No. 94181'' instead to ``Release No. 
34-94181.''

    Dated: February 15, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-03552 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brion Umidi, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen
Biologics, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003

| |  |     |  |                        
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ BRION UMIDI        
| |  |     |  |                        
| |  |     |  | Brion Umidi            
| |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. section1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fona, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chloe DiVita,
Treasurer, Secretary, Director and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



BY(Signature)                         /s/ Chloe DiVita
(Name and Title)                      Chloe DiVita,
                                      Treasurer, Secretary, Director
                                      and Chief Financial Officer

(Date)                                May 9, 2011





                                       15
**EXHIBIT 3.4B**
**FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS**
**OF**
**CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS CAPITAL CORPORATION**
         The Bylaws of the Corporation, are amended as follows:
ARTICLE III — BOARD
         SECTION 3.03 Vacancies and Additional Directorships. If any vacancy shalloccur among the directors by reason of death, resignation, or removal, or asthe result of an increase in the number of directorships, the directors then inoffice shall continue to act and any such vacancy may be filled by a vote ofthe majority of directors then in office, though less than a quorum, or by thestockholders entitled to vote at any annual meeting or special meeting held inaccordance with Article II, and each director so chosen shall hold office untilthe next annual election of directors and until his or her successor shall beduly elected and shall qualify, or until his or her earlier death, resignationor removal.
 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY
         The undersigned certifies:
         (1)  That the undersigned is duly elected and acting Assistant Secretary ofCharter Communications Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,the sole stockholder of the Corporation; and
         (2)  That the foregoing Bylaws constitute the Bylaws of the Corporation asamended by Charter Communications Holdings, LLC, as sole stockholder, as of the30th day of October, 2001.
         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed theseal of the Corporation as of this 30th day of October, 2001.     /s/ Marcy Lifton    Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 99.2


                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTiON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Centerpoint Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, that to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ David Fuller
----------------------------
David Fuller
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jovan Esteban REYES-PRADO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40032 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 18, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jovan Esteban Reyes-Prado, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jovan Esteban Reyes-Prado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Prado has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Arturo MEZA, also known as Junior, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40006 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 25, 2017

Traci Lynne Kenner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Arturo Meza, Pro Se

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Arturo Meza, federal prisoner # 07092-078, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy *284and substantive drug offenses involving the distribution of heroin and cocaine. He was sentenced to 360 months of imprisonment on five of the counts and 240 months of imprisonment on two of the counts.

Seeking a reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), Meza contends that there is an unwarranted disparity between his sentence and that of his brother and co-defendant, who was convicted in the same case and received a § 3582(c)(2) reduction. The district court denied Meza’s motion on the basis that the guideline amendment did not affect Meza’s guideline range because his base offense level was based on the deaths or serious bodily injuries that resulted from his heroin distribution, not the quantity of drugs he distributed.

Meza does not address the district court’s determination that he was not eligible for a reduction because his offense level was not affected by the amendment. Even if he were eligible, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a reduction for the reason argued by Meza. Meza does not allege any facts suggesting that there is an unwarranted sentencing disparity among similarly situated defendants. He provides no details of any similarities between his and his brother’s offense conduct, criminal records, other history, or characteristics. His conclusory assertion that his brother is similarly situated fails to show that an unwarranted disparity exists. *See United States v. Guillermo Balleza,*613 F.3d 432, 435 (5th Cir. 2010). The fact that a co-defendant received a sentence reduction does not alone show that the denial of Meza’s § 3582(c)(2) motion created an unwarranted sentencing disparity. *See United States v. Smith,*595 F.3d 1322, 1323 (5th Cir. 2010). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Meza’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. *United States v. Evans,*587 F.3d 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *284published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,662
<INVENTORY>                                     33,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,496
<PP&E>                                          69,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,103
<SALES>                                         59,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,469
<CGS>                                           45,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   52,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (318)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,472
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,708
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,708
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>
Virginia GARCIA, Appellant, v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee FOR SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING AND RESIDENTIAL FINANCE TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-BC3, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1686

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ocario ROMERO-HERNANDEZ, a.k.a. Ocario Hernandez, a.k.a. Ocario Hernandez-Romero, a.k.a. Ocario Romero, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30042

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 24, 2017

*764Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mark J. Ackley, Federal Defender Services of Idaho, Boise, ID, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ocario Romero-Hernandez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Romero-Hernandez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. He argues that the application of the 16-level enhancement to his base offense level was unduly harsh in light of the nature of his prior drug offense and his personal characteristics. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Romero-Hernandez’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States, 552*U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Romero-Hernandez’s criminal history and the need for deterrence. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


To the Board of Directors of
W Holding Company, Inc.
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-60126 and No. 333-103905 of W Holding Company, Inc. on Forms S-8 and S-3,
respectively, of our report dated March 5, 2004 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the
change in the method of accounting for derivative instruments effective January
1, 2001), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of W Holding Company,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 12, 2004

Stamp No. 1939047
affixed to original.
Janice GREEN v. STATE

CR-15-0531

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Skinvisible,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Skinvisible, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)     the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition
 and results of operations of Skinvisible, Inc.
  
 By:
    /s/ Terry HowlettName:
    Terry HowlettTitle:
    Principal Executive Officer,
      Principal Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
    April 13, 2005
 
  1