Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Notices 8605 

is to allow for 60 days of public 

comment. 

DATES: Comments Due Date: April 18, 

2022. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name and/or OMB 

Control Number and should be sent to: 

Colette Pollard, Reports Management 

Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 7th Street 

SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC 

20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400 

(this is not a toll-free number) or email 

at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of 

the proposed forms or other available 

information. Persons with hearing or 

speech impairments may access this 

number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877– 

8339. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dawn Smith, Office of Policy, Programs 

and Legislative Initiatives, PIH, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room 

3178, Washington, DC 20410; telephone 

202–402–4109, (this is not a toll-free 

number). Persons with hearing or 

speech impairments may access this 

number via TTY by calling the Federal 

Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. Copies 

of available documents submitted to 

OMB may be obtained from Ms. Rogers. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice informs the public that HUD is 

seeking approval from OMB for the 

information collection described in 

Section A. 

A. Overview of Information Collection 

Title of Proposal: Inspector Candidate 

Assessment Questionnaire. 

OMB Approval Number: 2577–0243. 

Type of Request: Reinstatement with 

change of a previously approved 

collection. 

Form Number: Form HUD 50002A 

and Form HUD 50002B—HFA. 

Description of the need for the 

information and proposed use: To meet 

the requirements of HUD’s Uniform 

Physical Condition Standards (UPCS), 

the Physical Condition of Multifamily 

Properties and the Public Housing 

Assessment System (PHAS) regulations, 

the Department conducts physical 

condition inspections of approximately 

14,000 multifamily and public housing 

properties annually. HUD uses contract 

inspectors that are trained and certified 

in the UPCS protocol by HUD to 

conduct UPCS inspections. Individuals 

who wish to be trained and certified 

UPCS by HUD are requested to 

electronically submit the questionnaire 

via the internet. The questionnaire 

provides HUD with basic knowledge of 

an individual’s inspection skills and 

abilities. 

As part of aligning REAC UPCS 

inspections with those conducted by 

state Housing Finance Agencies, state 

HFA staff also may fill out a form for 

information purposes only prior to 

attending the UPCS training. 

Respondents: Applicants to the UPCS 

inspector certification program and state 

HFA staff. 

Information collection Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Responses 

per annum 

Burden hour 

per response 

Annual 

burden hours 

Hourly cost 

per response Annual cost 

HUD 50002A ................................................. 200 1 200 0.33 66 $34.86 $2,300.76 

HUD 50002B–FHA ........................................ 35 1 35 0.25 9 34.86 313.74 

Total Burden .......................................... ........................ ........................ 235 1 75 ........................ 2,614.50 

B. Solicitation of Public Comment 

This notice is soliciting comments 

from members of the public and affected 

parties concerning the collection of 

information described in Section A on 

the following: 

(1) Whether the proposed collection 

of information is necessary for the 

proper performance of the functions of 

the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information; 

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond; including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology, e.g., permitting 

electronic submission of responses. 

HUD encourages interested parties to 

submit comment in response to these 

questions. 

C. Authority 

Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35. 

Laura Miller-Pittman, 

Chief, Office of Policy, Programs and 

Legislative Initiatives. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03176 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1209] 

Certain Movable Barrier Operator 

Systems and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Commission Final 

Determination Finding a Violation of 

Section 337; Issuance of a Limited 

Exclusion Order and a Cease and 

Desist Order; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has found a violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission has 

issued a limited exclusion order 

(‘‘LEO’’) prohibiting the importation of 

certain movable barrier operator systems 

and components thereof that are 

imported by or on behalf of The 

Chamberlain Group, Inc. of Oak Brook, 

Illinois (‘‘Respondent’’), and that 

infringe claims 1, 4, 16, and 19 of U.S. 

Patent No. 9,483,935 (‘‘the ’935 patent’’); 

claims 18 and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,956,718 (‘‘the ’718 patent’’) and claim 

17 of U.S. Patent No. 8,410,895 (‘‘the 

’895 patent’’). The Commission has also 

issued a cease and desist order (‘‘CDO’’) 

against Respondent. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

I I I I I I I 
8606 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 15, 2022 / Notices 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

10, 2020, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by Overhead Door 

Corporation of Lewisville, Texas and 

GMI Holdings Inc. of Mount Hope, Ohio 

(collectively, ‘‘Complainants’’). See 85 

FR 48264–65 (Aug. 10, 2020). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges a 

violation of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain movable barrier operator systems 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 

8,970,345 (‘‘the ’345 patent’’); 7,173,516 

(‘‘the ’516 patent’’); 7,180,260 (‘‘the ’260 

patent’’); the ’935 patent; the ’718 

patent; and the ’895 patent. See id. The 

notice of investigation names The 

Chamberlain Group, Inc. of Oak Brook, 

Illinois as the respondent in this 

investigation. See id. The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations is not a 

party to the investigation. See id. 

On February 10, 2021, the 

Commission terminated the 

investigation as to the ’516 patent based 

on the withdrawal of the allegations in 

the complaint as to that patent. See 

Order No. 10 (Jan. 19, 2021), unreviewed 

by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 10, 2021). 

On May 26, 2021, Commission 

determined not to review an initial 

determination granting Complainants’ 

motion for summary determination that 

the economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement is satisfied. See 

Order No. 12 (April 26, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 26, 

2021). 

On September 14, 2021, the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

issued a final initial determination 

(‘‘FID’’) finding a violation of section 

337 based on the infringement by 

Respondent of all of Complainants’ 

asserted patent claims. Specifically, the 

FID finds that: (1) The asserted patent 

claims are all infringed by Respondent’s 

accused products and redesigned 

products; (2) the domestic industry 

products practice the asserted patents; 

and (3) the asserted patents are not 

invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101, 102, or 

103. The ALJ also issued a 

recommended determination (‘‘RD’’) 

recommending, should the Commission 

find a violation of section 337, that the 

Commission issue: (1) A limited 

exclusion order against certain movable 

barrier operator systems and 

components thereof that are imported 

into the United States, sold for 

importation, and sold within the United 

States after importation, by the 

Respondent; and (2) a cease and desist 

order against the Respondent. The RD 

also recommends that the Commission 

set a bond during the period of 

Presidential review in an amount of 100 

percent of the entered value of the 

movable barrier operator systems 

imported by or on behalf of the 

Respondent. 

On October 14, 2021, the parties filed 

statements on the public interest 

pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50, 19 

CFR 210.50. Between October 20, 2021, 

and November 3, 2021, members of the 

public filed written submissions in 

response to the Federal Register notice 

requesting public interest comments. 

See 86 FR 56982–83 (Oct. 13, 2021). 

On December 6, 2021, the 

Commission issued a notice 

determining to review the FID in part 

(‘‘the WTR Notice’’). See 86 FR 70527– 

29 (Dec. 10, 2021). The WTR Notice also 

requested written submissions from the 

parties on the issues under review, and 

from the parties, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties on issues of remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding. See id. 

On December 13, 2021, the parties 

filed written submissions in response to 

the WTR Notice, and on December 20, 

2020, the parties filed responses to each 

other’s submissions. On December 13, 

2021, members of the public filed 

written submissions concerning the 

public interest in response to the WTR 

Notice. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the FID, the RD, 

and the parties’ and non-parties’ 

submissions, the Commission has 

determined to affirm with modification 

the FID’s determination of a violation of 

section 337 with respect to claims 1, 4, 

16, and 19 of the ’935 patent; claims 18 

and 24 of the ’718 patent; and claim 17 

of the ’895 patent. The Commission 

reverses and finds no violation as to the 

asserted claims of the ’345 and ’260 

patents. Specifically, as explained in the 

Commission Opinion filed concurrently 

herewith, the Commission has 

determined to: (1) Affirm with 

modification the FID’s infringement 

findings as to the asserted claims of the 

’935 patent; (2) reverse the FID’s 

infringement findings as to the asserted 

claims of the ’345 patent; (3) affirm with 

modification the FID’s validity findings 

as to the asserted claims of the ’935 and 

’345 patents over Keller (RX–44); (4) 

reverse the FID’s infringement findings 

as to the asserted claims of the ’260 

patent; (5) vacate and take no position 

as to the FID’s finding that the asserted 

claims of the ’260 patent are patenteligible under 35 U.S.C. 101; (6) affirm 

with modification the FID’s 

infringement findings as to the asserted 

claims of the ’718 and ’895 patents; and 

(7) affirm with modification the FID’s 

finding that the asserted claims of the 

’718 and ’895 patents are patent-eligible 

under 35 U.S.C. 101. 

All findings in the FID that are not 

inconsistent with the Commission’s 

determination are affirmed. 

The Commission has determined that 

the appropriate remedy is an LEO 

against Respondent’s infringing 

products and a CDO against 

Respondent. The Commission has also 

determined that the public interest 

factors enumerated in subsection 

337(d)(1) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C. 

1337(d)(1), (f)(1)) do not preclude the 

issuance of the LEO and CDO. The 

Commission has further determined to 

set a bond during the period of 

Presidential review in the amount of 

100 percent of the entered value of 

Respondent’s infringing products (19 

U.S.C. 1337(j)). 

The Commission’s orders and opinion 

were delivered to the President and to 

the United States Trade Representative 

on the day of their issuance. 

The Commission’s vote for this 

determination took place on February 9, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 9, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03167 Filed 2–14–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1105–0030] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Previously Approved Collection; 

Comments Requested; Electronic 

Applications for the Attorney General’s 

Honors Program and the Summer Law 

Intern Program 

AGENCY: Office of Attorney Recruitment 

and Management, Department of Justice. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1