IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,922-02

EX PARTE MARCUS DEWAYNE JOSHUA, Applicant 

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 21-0005CR IN THE 87TH DISTRICT COURT 

FROM LEON COUNTY 

SLAUGHTER, J., filed a concurring opinion. 

CONCURRING OPINION

While I join in the Court’s decision to grant Applicant post-conviction habeas 

corpus relief in the form of an out-of-time appeal, I feel compelled to write separately, yet 

again, to emphasize the importance of counsel’s duty to file a timely notice of appeal when 

the defendant expresses a desire to appeal. This issue underlies far too many ineffectiveassistance-of-counsel cases before us and is a troubling sign that many attorneys are either 
Joshua - 2

unaware of the proper procedures for filing a notice of appeal, or are aware of such 

requirements but are failing to stay on top of their responsibilities to clients.

I. Background

On November 15, 2022, a jury convicted Applicant of capital murder and sentenced 

him to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. After entering the judgment, the 

trial court certified Applicant’s right to appeal. The original deadline for filing a notice of 

appeal was December 15, 2022—30 days after the sentence was imposed. See TEX.R. APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1). However, trial counsel never filed a notice of appeal before withdrawing

from the case.

Following trial counsel’s withdrawal, the trial court appointed initial appellate 

counsel to handle Applicant’s direct appeal. On December 5, 2022, initial appellate counsel 

filed a timely motion for new trial. This extended the deadline for filing a notice of appeal 

in the trial court by 60 days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). Thus, the deadline for filing a 

notice of appeal became February 13, 2023—90 days after Applicant’s sentence was 

imposed.

Two weeks after filing the motion for new trial, initial appellate counsel withdrew, 

and the trial court appointed new appellate counsel to take over Applicant’s direct appeal. 

New appellate counsel was aware that neither of the two preceding attorneys had filed a 

notice of appeal, and she intended to file such notice herself. However, she failed to do so 

until February 21, 2023—98 days after Applicant’s sentence was imposed. 

On March 6, 2023, the court of appeals notified Applicant that his appeal was 

subject to dismissal because the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. Joshua v. State, 
Joshua - 3

No. 10-23-00054-CR, 2023 WL 2528599, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Mar. 15, 2023, no pet.) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication). The court gave applicant 14 days to file a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Id. In response, on March 9, 2023, 

new appellate counsel filed with the trial court a “Request to Accept Late Filing of 

Defendant’s Notice of Appeal.” Id. In this document, counsel explained that her failure to 

file a timely notice of appeal was the result of a “regrettable clerical error” that caused her 

to mis-calendar Applicant’s case upon being appointed.1 The court of appeals treated the 

filing as a motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Id. However, because the 

motion was not filed within 15 days of the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the court 

of appeals determined that it was untimely, such that the court had no choice but to dismiss 

Applicant’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id. Applicant then filed the instant application 

for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking the ability to pursue an out-of-time appeal.

II. Trial and Appellate Counsel’s Post-Judgment Duties

While it is regrettable that appellate counsel failed to timely file the notice of appeal

based on her mistaken calculation of the applicable deadline, this situation could have been 

avoided altogether if trial counsel had simply ensured that the notice of appeal was filed at 

the conclusion of his representation. Indeed, as this Court has repeatedly indicated, and as 

I have emphasized in numerous recent opinions, it is principally the duty of trial counsel 

(not appellate counsel) to ensure that the notice of appeal is timely filed upon the 

1 Specifically, appellate counsel explained that this mistake was the result of having inherited 

multiple cases, in various stages of the appellate process, from Applicant’s initial appellate counsel 

after he was appointed as a trial judge by the governor.
Joshua - 4

conclusion of the trial proceedings if the defendant expresses a desire to appeal. See, e.g., 

Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating that “[i]f the defendant 

decides to appeal, the [trial] attorney must ensure that written notice of appeal is filed with 

the trial court.”) (emphasis added).2 In Jones, we recognized that in many instances the 

trial attorney will not be representing the defendant on appeal, and in those situations, trial 

counsel should present to the court the defendant’s signed pro se notice of appeal alongside 

counsel’s motion to withdraw. See id. (“A ‘contemporaneous’ presentation of the pro se 

notice with a motion to withdraw by trial counsel serves as actual notice to the trial court 

of the defendant’s desire to appeal.”).3 There is no valid reason to delay the filing of the 

notice of appeal until appellate counsel becomes the official attorney of record. Countless 

times we have seen miscommunication between trial and appellate counsel, or a delay in 

retaining or appointing appellate counsel, which then results in the defendant missing the 

deadline for filing his notice of appeal. Because of this risk, trial counsel should take the 

simple step of ensuring that the defendant’s appellate rights are immediately protected by 

2 See also American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Standards, Defense Function, Standard 4.9-

1(a)-(d), “Preparing to Appeal” (“If a client is convicted, defense counsel should explain to the 

client the meaning and consequences of the court’s judgment and the client’s rights regarding 

appeal . . . . Defense counsel should take whatever steps are necessary to protect the client’s rights 

of appeal, including filing a timely notice of appeal in the trial court, even if counsel does not 

expect to continue as counsel on appeal. Defense counsel should explain to the client that the client 

has a right to counsel on appeal (appointed, if the client is indigent), and that there are lawyers 

who specialize in criminal appeals. Defense counsel should candidly explore with the client 

whether trial counsel is the appropriate lawyer to represent the client on appeal, or whether a 

lawyer specializing in appellate work should be consulted, added or substituted.”) (emphasis 

added).

3 In Jones, we further explained that to satisfy his duties, trial counsel may either “sign the notice 

himself, in which case, he effectively ‘volunteers’ to serve as appellate counsel,” or, “the defendant 

may file the notice pro se, which serves as an indication that trial counsel does not wish to pursue 

his client’s appeal.” Jones, 98 S.W.3d at 703 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
Joshua - 5

presenting the notice of appeal alongside counsel’s motion to withdraw. Had trial counsel 

done so here, Applicant’s right of appeal would have been protected long before his second 

appellate attorney was even appointed to the case, thereby preventing the error that 

ultimately occurred.

In spite of the foregoing, I do not mean to suggest that appellate counsel is blameless 

here; a prudent appellate attorney should always ensure that the notice of appeal has, in 

fact, been timely filed. If counsel is unsure whether the notice has been filed, she should 

check with trial counsel and/or the trial court. And if, as here, appellate counsel knows for 

certain that trial counsel did not file a notice of appeal, and she takes on the responsibility 

of doing so herself, she should verify the applicable filing deadlines and comply with them. 

Thus, although as a policy matter, I urge trial attorneys to fulfill their obligation of filing 

notices of appeal to avoid these types of problems, I recognize that, under the 

circumstances, appellate counsel bears the ultimate responsibility for the mistake that 

occurred here.

As a final note, while counsel’s mistake here can be “fixed” by allowing Applicant 

to file an out-of-time appeal, this “fix” is not without consequences. In addition to 

significantly delaying resolution of Applicant’s direct appeal, counsel’s error has also now 

resulted in the habeas court, the court of appeals, and this Court having to expend resources 

to undo the effects of counsel’s error. While we are all human beings who make mistakes, 

based on the sheer volume of writ applications this Court sees annually in which this or 

similar problems arise, I feel that it is my ethical obligation to bring attention to this issue 

so that attorneys may be reminded of the effect of failing to stay on top of their 
Joshua - 6

responsibilities.4 It is my hope that both trial and appellate attorneys will implement 

practices to help reduce the need for such corrective post-conviction litigation in the future.

With these comments, I join the Court’s opinion granting Applicant relief.

Filed: October 25, 2023

Publish

4 See Tex. Code Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(D)(2) (“A judge who receives information clearly 

establishing that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of 

Professional Conduct should take appropriate action.”).