alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6250 

To require the heads of certain Federal agencies to report to Congress 

ties of agency employees to Hamas or the display of support for Hamas, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. MOLINARO (for himself, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

MOSKOWITZ, Mr. VAN DREW, and Mr. LAWLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, the Judiciary, Homeland 

Security, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the heads of certain Federal agencies to report 

to Congress ties of agency employees to Hamas or the 

display of support for Hamas, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent Hamas Sup5 porters in the U.S. Government Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6250 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORTS ON FEDERAL AGENCY EMPLOYEE TIES TO 

2 PLO. 

3 (a) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORTS.—Not later than 

4 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

5 Inspector General of each covered agency shall submit to 

6 Congress a report containing a list of any employee of 

7 such covered agency who has financial, organizational, or 

8 communication ties to Hamas and a detailed description 

9 of such ties. 

10 (b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—Not later 

11 than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

12 the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 

13 to Congress a report on the prevalence of employees of 

14 covered agencies or each covered agency who have ties to 

15 Hamas. Such report shall include the recommendations of 

16 the Comptroller General, if any, regarding legislation to 

17 combat the hiring of individuals who have ties to Hamas. 

18 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

19 (1) the term ‘‘communication’’ includes any 

20 posts by a covered agency employee on social media 

21 in support of Hamas or in support of actions taken 

22 by Hamas; 

23 (2) the term ‘‘covered agency’’ means the De24 partment of State, the Department of Defense, the 

25 Department of Homeland Security, the Federal BuVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:40 Dec 01, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6250.IH H6250

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6250 IH

1 reau of Investigation, and the Central Intelligence 

2 Agency; and 

3 (3) the term ‘‘employee’’ includes— 

4 (A) any employee (as that term is defined 

5 in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code); 

6 and 

7 (B) any member of the Armed Forces (as 

8 that term is defined in section 2101 of such 

9 title). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chester EDGERTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7776

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2017

Decided: April 25, 2017

*178Chester Edgerton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Edgerton appeals the district court’s order denying a postjudgment motion filed' in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6913

JEFFREY SCOTT CLEGG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL D. MURPHY, Dr.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DAVID M. HINDS, PA; JAMIE REID; PAULA SMITH,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-02-752-5-H)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Scott Clegg, Appellant Pro Se. Renee Billings Crawford,

CRAWFORD LAW OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Scott Clegg appeals the district court’s order setting

aside a default judgment against one of the named defendants and

denying Clegg’s discovery motions. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Clegg seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we deny Clegg’s “motion for clarification” and

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS *&*JOINERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 1281, AFL-CIO, Respondent.

No. 20761.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 23, 1966.

*685Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory I. Hellrung, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Victor J. Van Bourg, Stewart Weinberg, of Levy, DeRoy, Geffner & Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS, POPE and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board has entered an order requiring respondent union to cease and desist from causing or attempting to cause Rayber-Kief, Inc., to deny employment to, or in any other manner discriminate against, Ivan DiBoff, in violation of section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act; or from denying a referral to, or in any other way discriminating against DiBoff for engaging in activities as a union member or from in any like or related manner restraining or coercing the company’s employees in the exercise of their statutory rights. Affirmatively the union was required to notify the company that it had no objection to the continued employment of DiBoff and to make DiBoff whole for loss of wages and to post appropriate notices. 152 N.L.R.B. No. 48.

The Board now petitions for enforcement, and respondent challenges the factual determinations of the Board upon two issues: (1) whether Powell, in operating the union hiring hall, discriminated against DiBoff; (2) if so, whether such discrimination was improperly motivated or was the result of innocent mistake. Upon neither issue were the Board’s findings clearly erroneous.

There is ample support for the Board’s finding that Powell referred other list 2 carpenters to Rayber-Kief in disregard of its agreed quota while denying such reference to DiBoff. There is no basis for an assumption that the referred carpenters were requested by name, and in any case an inference of a continuing request for DiBoff was available under the facts. The Board was not in error in holding that such conduct amounted to discrimination.

The union asserts that in finding that the discrimination was motivated by animus, the Board has disregarded credibility determinations of the hearing examiner. We disagree. The hearing examiner did not reach this question, having concluded that there was no discrimination.

The Board’s order is entitled to enforcement.
Vanessa CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. BEACH FRONT PARKING, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 3D17-1427 & 3D17-1008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

The McGill Law Firm, and David McGill, for appellant.

Entin Law Group, and Joshua M. Entin and Michelle R. Jacobs (Fort Lauderdale); Cole, Scott & Kissane, and Kathryn L. Ender and Maria D. Vera, for appellees.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 614 

To amend the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 to provide 

for the inclusion of certain workers in the exemption from numerical 

limitations on H–2B workers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2023 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 

2005 to provide for the inclusion of certain workers 

in the exemption from numerical limitations on H–2B 

workers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Fishing 

5 and Seafood Business Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 614 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN WORKERS IN EXEMPTION 

2 FROM NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS ON H–2B 

3 WORKERS. 

4 Section 14006 of the Department of Defense Appro5 priations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287) is amended to 

6 read as follows: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 14006. The numerical limitation contained in 

8 section 214(g)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality 

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(B)) shall not apply to any non10 immigrant alien issued a visa or otherwise provided status 

11 under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 

12 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b)) who is employed (or has received 

13 an offer of employment)— 

14 ‘‘(1) on a commercial fishing vessel or shrimp 

15 trawler; or 

16 ‘‘(2) in the processing of— 

17 ‘‘(A) fish or fishery products; or 

18 ‘‘(B) baitfish. 

19 Terms used in this section have the meanings given such 

20 terms in section 123.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regula21 tions.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<Page>

Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlantic Syndication Network, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 28,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Kent G.
Wyatt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Glenn Schlosser, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that
to his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kent G. Wyatt

Kent G. Wyatt
Chief Executive Officer
June 6, 2007


/s/Glenn Schlosser

Glenn Schlosser
Chief Financial Officer
June 6, 2007

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Atlantic Syndication Network, Inc. and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.]
#### ROSEMARY LUCIBELLO *v.*MICHAEL A. LUCIBELLO

*Earl I. Williams,*in support of the petition.

Decided September 18, 1997

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 911 (AC 16254), is denied.
Hector Raul Gonzalez GARCIA, Appellant, v. NEWBERG IRRIGATION, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4270

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Opinion filed May 28, 20 09



### In The 

# Eleven th Court of Appeals

____________ 

### No. 1 1- 07 -0 03 66 -CR

____ ____ __ JOHN WILLIAM LA YTO N, Ap pellant

V. STA TE OF TEX AS , A ppellee On App eal from the 35th Distric t Court Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR 19046

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Th e jur y c on vic te d Joh n Wil liam L ay to n of dr ivi ng wh ile int oxic a te d w itha c hil d a s a pa sse ng e r a

nd a sse sse d his pu nis hme nt a t c on fi ne me nt in a state ja il fa c ili ty fo r on e y e a r. We a ff ir m. After a hea ring pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(b), the trial court found that appe llant was not indigent a

nd conclude d that appellant had either f ailed to make the nece ssary arr ang ements for the fi lin g of

his br ie f o r ha d a

ba nd on e d his a

pp e a l. Th e re fo re , purs ua

nt to Rul e 38 .8 (b )( 4) , w e wi ll consider this appe al on the re cord a lone.2

We have r eviewe d the re cord be fore us and note that it does not contain re versible e rror . T EX . R. A PP . P. 44.2(a). The ref ore, the judgme nt of the trial cour t is affirmed.
PER C URI AM May 28, 2009 Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J ., M c C a l l , J. , a n d

S t r a n g e , J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,341,216
<SECURITIES>                                 2,440,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                  576,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,913,785
<PP&E>                                       1,336,770
<DEPRECIATION>                               (933,876)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,632,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          677,866
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       565,715
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,298,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,632,246
<SALES>                                      1,339,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,406,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (930,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (945,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (945,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

February 23, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-415-527-5035, Code: 2763 825 4435; or via web:                         *https://tspmeet.webex.com/​tspmeet/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​e668eeb9f8e4ab246455527de529d7a2b.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the January 24, 2022 Board Meeting Minutes

2. Investment Manager Annual Service Review

3. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Activity Report

(b) Investment Performance

(c) Legislative Report

4. Investment Policy Review Frequency

5. Quarterly Report

(d) Metrics

6. Converge Update

7. Agency Recognition

### Closed Session

8. Information Covered Under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10)

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).                

Dated: February 10, 2022.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2022-03230 Filed 2-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Each Office is independently Owned And Operated. **SUPPORT CENTER** 18756 STONE OAK PARK WAY, SUITE 301 SAN ANTONIO , TX 78258 BUS (210 ) 483 - 7000 Michael J. Cameron 800 Independence Ave,., S W Washington, D.C. 20591 Dear Michael J. Cameron, Thank you for taking the time to review our petition for expemtion. Your letter requested the following information:  Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixed - wing, rotocraft, lighter-than - air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals. Listed below you will find the detailed answers to the requested information:  Describe the aircraft make: DJI  Describe the aircraft model: Phantom 3 Professional  Describe the aircraft type: Quad rotorcraft  Describe t he weight: 1280g (including battery and propellers)  Describe the maximum payload weight: approximately 420 g Please, let me know if there is anymore information that is needed for this petition. Sincerely, Lupe Robles Corporate Photogra p her and Vide ographer
From: nancy hyke [mailto:hykeinalaska@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 1:16PM 

To: Hank@hankm.com 

Subject: Essential Air Service for kake Alaska 

To whom It May concern, 

Air Excursions provides our mail and flight service 

here in Kake. I have lived and worked here in Kake 

since 1996. Air Excursions provides excellent, , dependable air service on a constant basis. My husband 

works for Alaska marine Highway so he needs to fly in 

and out of Kake all year to get to his dispatched assignments.This has proven very difficult for him in 

the past, however since Air Excursions has been flying into Kake he has made every assignment with out having 

to leave home three days early. Air excursions is the 

only air service we have had in Kake that provides us 

with a consistent schedule that they stick to, so the 

people who live here and work out of town can get back 

and forth to work in a timely fashion. The employees and pilots are always polite, courteous and very helpful. 

The flight service that comes into Kake provides a way for us to get mail and freight, as well as doctor 

appointments and vacation time. It is really an 

essential part of southeast Alaska life. 

I hope that Air excursions will continue to be our 

flight service and mail carrier, we received our mail 

all year this year in a timely manner. In the past we 

have gone two weeks or more without mail in the 

winter. 

I support Air Excursions bid to continue to provide us 

with reliable air service. I hope they will continue to 

be our flight service for years to come. 

If you have any questions please feel free to call me 

at sos value Mart 907-785-6444 

Home 907-785-3231 cell 907-518-4190 

Nancy L Hyke
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,324
<SECURITIES>                                    43,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,990
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,893
<PP&E>                                           6,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,896)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,141
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,856
<SALES>                                          2,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,392
<CGS>                                              234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (62)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.47)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
<FN>
<F1> For Purposes of this Exhibit Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>