alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Louis Charles HAMILTON, II, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Donald John TRUMP, Sr., 45th President, Defendant – Appellee

No. 17-40068 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 5, 2017

Louis Charles Hamilton, II, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, PRADO, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Louis Hamilton, a pro se plaintiff proceeding *in forma pauperis,*appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The district court may dismiss a suit by an IFP plaintiff as frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact, *Siglar v. Hightower,*112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997), and we review a dismissal of a claim as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for abuse of discretion. *Ruiz v. United States,*160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998).

After reviewing Hamilton’s filings, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in deeming Hamilton’s case frivolous. Hamilton brings suit against Donald Trump, Sr. and others on behalf of a number of plaintiffs—some living, some dead—but we are unable to determine what remedy he seeks and under what legal authority he seeks it. Although we construe pro se pleadings liberally, a suit that is based on an “indisputably merit-less” legal theory—or one that is founded in no theory at all—is frivolous and must be dismissed. *Geiger v. Jowers,*404 F.3d 371, 373 (5th Cir. 2005). The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED. Because Hamilton’s other pending motions (including one to recuse two members of this Court apparently because of their race) are also frivolous, they are similarly DENIED.

We also warn Hamilton that, given his propensity for filing meritless claims, future frivolous filings will result in sanctions, which may include dismissal, monetary sanctions, and restrictions on his ability to file pleadings in this court.1*See Mendoza v. Lynaugh,*989 F.2d 191, 195-97 (5th Cir. 1993).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. This court has already dismissed one appeal by Hamilton as frivolous, *Hamilton v. Zanders,*463 Fed.Appx. 244 (5th Cir. 2012), and he has been barred from filing cases in the Southern District of Texas unless he obtains leave of court. See *Hamilton v. United States,*No. 4:16-CV-964 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2017).
#### Erik TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Victor LEMUS; Joaquin Rincon, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56117

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

OCTOBER 4, 2017

Erik Taylor Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Ashlee Clark, Gilbert M. Nishimura, Esquire, Andrew Charles Pongracz, Seki, Nishimura & Watase, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Erik Taylor appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment following a jury *442trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and other constitutional violations related to his arrest and prosecution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We are unable to consider Taylor’s contentions that the district court erred by entering judgment for defendants because Taylor failed to provide any portion of the trial transcript. *See*Fed. R. App. P, 10(b)(2) (“If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to that finding or conclusion.”); *Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade,*924 F.2d 167, 168 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal filed by pro se appellant for failure to comply with Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2)).

The motion to withdraw as pro bono counsel for appellant (Docket Entry No. 22) is granted. Upon more detailed review of the record, the March 22, 2016 and May 9, 2017 orders regarding the appointment of pro bono counsel are vacated. This appeal is removed from the court’s pro bono program and the Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding pro se.

Taylor’s motions for' appointment of counsel (Docket Entry Nos. 11, 23) are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 18604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07343]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 22, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0035.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: April 8, 2014.
    Description: Application of SkyGreece Airlines S.A. requesting 
exemption authority and a foreign air carrier permit to conduct: (a) 
foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of persons, property, 
and mail from any point or points behind any Member State of the 
European Union via any point or points in any Member State and via 
intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and 
beyond; (b) foreign scheduled and charter air transportation of 
persons, property, and mail between any point or points in the United 
States and any point or points in any Member of the European Common 
Aviation Area; (c) foreign scheduled and charter cargo air 
transportation between any point or points in the United States and any 
other point or points; (d) other charters pursuant to the prior 
approval requirements; and (e) scheduled and charter transportation 
consistent with any future, additional rights that may be granted to 
foreign air carriers of the Member States of the European Union.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-07343 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
GLOBE BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.
                            EXHIBIT 99 - SAFE HARBOR

     The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor
from civil litigation in many instances for forward-looking statements. In order
to take advantage of the Act, such  statements must be accompanied by meaningful
cautionary  statements that identify  important  factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those that might be projected. This exhibit to
the  Registrant's  Form 10-Q is being filed in order to allow the  Registrant to
take  advantage of the new  provisions  of this Act by providing  the  following
cautionary statements:

Risk Factors Affecting Globe

     Globe's  business  operations  and  strategy  are  subject  to a number  of
uncertainties  and risks which could  adversely  affect its  performance  in the
future. Among these are the following factors:

     Globe's  principal  growth  strategy  depends on the  acquisition  of other
companies  in  the  rent-to-rent  and  corporate  housing  businesses.  Although
previous  acquisitions  have been successful to date,  there can be no assurance
that any additional  acquisitions  will be consummated or that, if  acquisitions
are  consummated,  they will be successful.  Acquisitions  require a significant
commitment of corporate  resources,  management  attention and capital which, in
certain cases, could exceed that available to Globe.  Additionally,  Globe could
experience unexpected costs and operational difficulties in integrating acquired
businesses.

     Many of Globe's competitors have greater financial and other resources than
Globe. These resources could give them an advantage in price and service areas.

     Several of Globe's  rental  customers  compete with Globe in its  corporate
housing  business.  As Globe  expands  in the  corporate  housing  area,  it may
continue to lose rental business from those competitors.

     Globe is  dependent  on its computer  systems in its daily  operations.  In
addition,  Globe is developing a common  computer  system for its Corporate Stay
International business.  Significant cost or time overruns on the Corporate Stay
International  system  development or  unidentified  deficiencies in other Globe
systems could have a material adverse affect on Globe's operations.

     While the Company is unaware of material  adverse  consequences  related to
vendor or supplier  Year 2000  non-compliance,  it is possible that issues could
arise which would have a negative impact on Globe's operations.

     The  Company   believes  that  the  industry  it  serves  is  significantly
influenced  by  economic  conditions  generally  and by levels of job  creation,
relocations of employees and general  business  activity.  A prolonged  economic
downturn could have a material adverse affect on Globe's operations.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*KEITH BRASWELL

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 904 (AC 15025), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.

*954
      *Lori Welch-Rubin,*in support of the petition.

*Mary H. Lesser,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided December 2, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001005126
<NAME> COMMONWEALTH BANCORP INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          36,792
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                31,507
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    706,006
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         227,893
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           227,802
<LOANS>                                      1,126,313
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,236,008
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,524,874
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             32,737
<LONG-TERM>                                    464,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,680
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,236,008
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,055
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,579
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                13,821
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,455
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,915
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,607
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,848
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,189
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,189
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.51
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,258
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,187
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,971
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      299
<RECOVERIES>                                        72
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,044
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,044
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; URGenT: Translational Efforts to Advance Gene-based Therapies for Ultra-Rare Neurological and Neuromuscular Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         March 9, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *mirela.milescu@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 15, 2022. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-03666 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the National 
Research Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, May 4, 
2022, by Webex. The teleconference number is 1-404-397-1596, conference 
ID 199 811 6717 or the meeting link is https://veteransaffairs.webex.com/veteransaffairs/j.php?MTID=m000894cb2081a6845cd69505d4ba34e5. The meeting will convene 
at 11:00 a.m. and end at 2:00 p.m. Eastern daylight time. This meeting 
is open to the public.
    The purpose of the National Research Advisory Council is to advise 
the Secretary on research conducted by the Veterans Health 
Administration, including policies and programs targeting the high 
priority of Veterans' health care needs.
    On May 4, 2022, the agenda will include introduction of new NRAC 
members, discussion of calendar year 2022 goals; follow up discussion 
of diversity, equity, and inclusion activities in response to the NRAC 
recommendations; and discussion of subcommittee activities. No time 
will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from 
the public. Members of the public wanting to attend, have questions or 
presentations to present may contact Rashelle Robinson, Designated 
Federal Officer, Office of Research and Development (14RD), Department 
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, at 
202-443-5768, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#570536243f323b3b32792538353e3924383917213679303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cf9daebca7aaa3a3aae1bda0ada6a1bca0a18fb9aee1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a> no later than close of 
business on April 29, 2022. All questions and presentations will be 
presented during the public comment section of the meeting. Any member 
of the public seeking additional information should contact Rashelle 
Robinson at the above phone number or email address noted above.

    Dated: February 16, 2022.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-03683 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Evagelina Esparza Barrza, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of eClic, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this amended annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to
us by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

  b) evaluated the effectiveness of  the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in  the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during  the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect  the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  June 15, 2004                     /s/ Evagelina Esparza Barrza
--------------------                     ----------------------------
                                             Evagelina Esparza Barrza
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132422 & (22)(23) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, RYAN SINGER, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132422 

 COA: 273011 

Oakland CC: 05-066031-NH 

MICHAEL FREEDLAND, M.D., MICHAEL

FREEDLAND, M.D., P.C., and VISAGE

SPA, L.L.C., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion to stay the trial court 

proceedings is DENIED. 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk