alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF PINNACLE
DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2007

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007.

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that, the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This
certification is executed as of May 11, 2007.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael R. Sayre   
|Chief Executive Officer
OAR Box 1107 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

53) IV-B-3 

Docket Number: 

A-81-21 

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:47 PM Sheet 53 of 90 

P.1 
P.2 

V 

t RA DIAN 

CORPORATIO N 

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 

TO: 

FROM: 

June 14, 1985 

Vinyl Chloride Docket 

Karen K. Fidler 

A-81-21 

IV-B-3 

SUBJECT: Estimation of Current Vinyl Chloride Emissions from Relief 

Valve Discharges and Combined Sources at EDC/VC and PVC Plants 

Current vinyl chloride emissions from EDC/VC and PVC plants are estimated 

as follows: 

EDC/VC 

PVC 

For a 316,000 Mg/yr EDC/VC facility complying with the VC standard, 

emissions are estimated to be 93.3 Mg/yr (References 1, 2). 

Total EDC/VC industry production capacity in 1983 was 4,110 Gg/yr 

(Reference 3). 

Estimated capacity utilization by industry in 1983 was 62 percent 

(Reference 4). 

Estimated VC emissions: 

93.3 Mg/yr (4,110 x 103 Mg/yr ) (0.62) _ -,,2 M . 

316,000 Mg/yr " /D^

 ng/yr 

For a 68,000 Mg/yr PVC facility complying with the VC standard, emissions 

are estimated to be 140.5 Mg/yr (References 1, 2). 

Total PVC industry production capacity in 1983 was 3,680 Gg/yr 

(Reference 5). 

Estimated capacity utilization by industry in 1983 was 62.2 percent 

(Reference 4). 

Estimated VC emissions: 

140.5 Mg/yr (3,680 x 103 Mg/yr ) (0.622) _ , 7^n M . 

68,000 Mg/yr " %/J U ng/y r 

Total estimated VC emissions from EDC/VC and PVC facilities in 1983: 

752 + 4,730 = 5,480 Mg/yr 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100 
P.3 

Current vinyl chloride emissions from relief valve discharges in EDC/VC 

and PVC plants are estimated as follows: 

EDC/VC 

PVC 

Total estimated lbs of VC discharged through relief valves at 10 EDC/VC 

plants during the period 8/82 - 7/83 is 51,442 lb (Reference 4). 

Total number of EDC/VC plants is 12. 

Estimated VC emissions = 51,442 x _12 = 61,730 Ib/yr 

10 

Total estimated lbs VC discharged through relief valves at 19 PVC plants 

during the period 8/82 - 7/83 is 65,120 lb (Reference 4). 

Total number of PVC plants is 32. 

Estimated VC emissions = 65,120 x 22 = 109,680 Mg/yr 

19 

Total estimated VC emissions from relief valve discharges at EDC/VC and 

PCV facilities during the period 8/82 - 7/83: 

61,730 + 109,680 = 171,410 lb/yr = 77.8 Mg/yr 
P.4 

r 

References 

1. "Vinyl Chloride - A Review of National Emission Standards." 

EPA-450/3-82-003. February 1982. pp. 4-5, 4-6 (Docket Item II-A-19). 

2. Memorandum from Howie, R. H., Radian Corporation, to file. August 24, 

1984. Relief Valve Discharge Emissions Under Current Standard. (Docket 

Item II-B-45). 

3. Chemical Marketing Reporter. June 20, 1983. p. 66. 

4. "Vinyl Chloride: Relief Valve Standard." EPA-450/3-85-002. 

January 1985. p. 6-23. 

5. Chemical Marketing Reporter. June 27, 1983. p. 54.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Eugene STUTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-6350

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed March 31, 2017

*715Steven W. Creager, Arvo Q. Mikkanen, Office of the United States Attorney, Western District of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Susan M. Otto, Federal Public Defender, Kyle Wackenheim, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Western District of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant

Before KELLY, MATHESON, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER RESCINDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Per Curiam

This matter comes on for consideration of the government’s *Motion to Withdraw or Rescind Certificate of Appealability and Dismiss Appeal*and the defendant’s response. Upon consideration thereof, the motion is granted.

On February 15, 2017, this court granted a certificate of appealability as to “Whether enforcement of a collateral attack waiver to prevent a constitutional challenge to a sentence enhanced under the now-void residual clause of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines would result in a miscarriage of justice.”

The government argues in its motion that because *Beckles v. United States,*— U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017), held that the Guidelines are not unconstitutionally vague under *Johnson v. United States,*— U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), it undercuts the rationale for granting COA in this case. The defendant agrees.

In light of *Beckles,*we conclude that the aforementioned certificate of appealability was improvidently granted. We RESCIND the certificate of appealability issued on February 15, 2017, and DISMISS this appeal.
EXHIBIT 11.1

CAPITOL MULTIMEDIA AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


                                                     (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended June 30                                 1997         1996
                                                       ----------   ----------
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net Income                                             $1,673,712   $   81,740
Interest income from using the treasury stock method       91,051
                                                       ----------   ----------
Net Income                                             $1,764,763   $   81,740
                                                       ==========   ==========

Weighted average number of share
  outstanding during the three months                   6,032,065    4,832,065
Incremental shares issuable pursuant
  to outstanding options and warrants                     882,283            *
                                                       ----------   ----------
Weighted average number of shares used in
the computation of net income per share                 6,914,348    4,832,065
                                                       ==========   ==========
Primary earning per common share                       $      .26   $      .02
                                                       ==========   ==========

*Antidilutive

In computing net income per share using the treasury  stock  method,  net income
has been increased by $91,051 in interest income for the three months ended June
30,1997.  Fully  diluted and  primary net income per share for the three  months
ended June 30,1997 were not materially different.
Pour point

Confidential Business Information
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1781 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 125)IV-C-3 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/29/200810:46:24 AM Sheet 125of 142P. 2

Denni s Crumple r 05/05/0 0 02:5 8 P M To : ryan_landis@mckennacuneo.co m 

# 337-C- ^

cc : Subject : Re : NS R Refor m - Recen t Developments Mr . Landis , w e expec t t o promulgat e o rtak e som e actio n thi s calenda ryea ro n al l provision s propose d i n 199 6 an d notice d fo rfurthe rcommen t o n Jul y24,1998 . Ther e i s likel yt o b e a concurren t proposa l fo ra utilitysector-base d NS R progra m complianc e alternative . Yo u migh t wan t t o contac t Chuc k Knaus s a t Swidle r& Berli n 202-424-7644 ; o rLesle yRitt s a t Hoga n & Hartson 202-637-560 0 abou t non-utilit yissue s an d Bil l Bumper s a t Bake r& Botts;202-639-77i 8 abou t utilit yissues . Ther e mayb e limite d stakeholde r meeting s comin g u p o n certai n aspect s o f th e packages . Meeting s ar e no t schedule d righ t now , bu t th e folk s mentione d abov e wil l kno wth e detail s whe n the ybecom e availabl e ryanJandis@mckennacuneo.co m

ryan_landis@mcken n acuneo.co m 05/02/0 0 09:3 4 P M To : Denni s Crumpler/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

### cc : Subject : NS R Reform - Recen t Developments Mr . Crumpler , I' m veryintereste d i n findin g ou t abou t an yne wdevelopment s i n th e are a o f Ne wSourc e Revie wRefor m - particularl ywit h respec t t o th e possibl e promulgatio n o f th e 199 6 "refor m package " ( I though t I rea d a n articl e whic h mentione d EP Amayb e releasin g som e o f th e progra m i n 2000) . I woul d reall yappreciat e an yassistanc e wit h respec t t o publications , EP A advisoryopinions , articles , etc..o ran yreferenc e source s tha t yo u ma ykno w about . Than k you , Rya n Landi s W^Wf^Hlf^fwwwwWwW w •Confidentialit yNotice * Thi s electroni cmessag e transmissio n contain s informatio n fro m th e la wfir m o f McKenn a & Cuneo , L.L.P . whic h ma yb e confidentia l o rprotecte d b yth e attorney-clien t privileg e and/o rth e wor k produc t doctrine . I f yo u ar e no t th e intende d recipient , b e awar e tha t an ydisclosure , copying , distributio n o rus e o f th e conten t o f thi s informatio n i s prohibited . I f yo u hav e receive d thi s communicatio n i n error , pleas e notifyu s immediatel yb yemai l an d delet e th e origina l message .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,596,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               97,898,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                10,368,935
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,332,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 941,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,283,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,251
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,372,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,283,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,851,204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,370,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,880,341
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,019,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,580,927
<INCOME-TAX>                                   993,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,587,927
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

A MENDED O RDER ON M OTION F OR R ECONSIDERATION E N B ANC

Cause number s : 01

- 20

- 00477

- CR, 01

- 20

- 00478

- CR, and 01

- 20

- 00479

- CR

Style: In re The State of Texas ex rel. Brian W. Wice, Relator

Type of motion: Motion for reconsideration en banc

Party filing motion: Relator

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration en banc is denied

. The

temporary stay imposed on June 15, 2021 is lifted

.

Judge’s signature: /s/Julie Countiss

Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: September 9 , 2021

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman,

Landau, Highto wer, Countiss , Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra. Justice Farris not

participating.

Goodman, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration for reasons stated

in his concurring and dissenting opinion.

Guerra, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration with separate

opinion

.
**EXHIBIT - 31.2**

 

MOSSIMO,INC.

 

CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Edwin Lewis, Vice Chairman and Co-ChiefExecutive Officer of the registrant, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMossimo, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to usby others, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| /s/ EDWIN LEWIS                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edwin Lewis                                   |
| Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive  Officer |
| August 11, 2005                          |

 

----
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF PINNACLE
DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.

I, Michael
R. Sayre, certify that, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that
information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of May 15, 2008.



/s/ Michael R. SayreChief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial
Officer
**EXHIBIT - 32.2**

** **

**MOSSIMO,INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mossimo, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwinLewis, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report to which this certification is attached as Exhibit-32.2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the Company.

 
| /s/ Edwin Lewis                |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Edwin Lewis                    |   |   |
| Acting Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| November 11, 2004              |   |   |

 

----
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2010

- NM

- 050

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PERSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George A. Troutman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George A. Troutman 
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fona, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Friess, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |     |                                  | 
|------------- | --- | -------------------------------- | 
|April 9, 2013 | By: | /s/ Michael Friess               | 
|              |     | Michael Friess                   | 
|              |     | Chairman of the Board, President | 
|              |     | and Chief Executive Officer      | 
|              |     | (Principal Executive Officer)    |