alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sharon Brown et al., Appellants, v Basics USA, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[771 NYS2d 525]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered May 13, 2002, which granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants each made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In this regard, the mannequin upon which the plaintiff Sharon Brown allegedly tripped was readily observable and not an inherently dangerous condition *(see Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment. Santucci, J.P., Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
PETS' TRUST MIAMI, INC., et al., Appellants, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-2900

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 2, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of Grayson Bankshares, Inc. (the Company), we, Jacky K. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Blake M. Edwards, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



(a)

the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.







By:   /s/ Jacky K. Anderson

Date:

November 12, 2004

Jacky K. Anderson

Chief Executive Officer







By:   /s/ Blake M. Edwards

Date:

November 12, 2004

Blake M. Edwards

Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Louis Buchalter, Emanuel Weiss and Louis Capone, Appellants.

Submitted June 14, 1943;

decided June 18, 1943.

Motiojn for reargument denied. (See 289 N. Y. 181.)
**Exhibit 23.01** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements on    Form S-8    (Nos.    333-123299,333-72192,333-58510,333-55828,333-54886,333-48582,333-46252,333-84545,333-89170,333-89172    and    333-113662)    and on    Form S-3    (Nos.    333-107963,333-72746,333-61410    and    333-80419)    of Move, Inc. (formerly Homestore, Inc.) of our report dated    March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial    statements and financial statement schedule of Move, Inc.    (formerly Homestore, Inc.), Move, Inc. (formerly Homestore,    Inc.), management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting of Move, Inc.    (formerly Homestore, Inc.) included in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K/A    for the year ended December 31, 2005.        /s/  ERNST    & YOUNG LLP     Los Angeles, California    November 1, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chromcraft Revington, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael E. Thomas, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.





/s/ Michael E. Thomas
------------------------------------------
Michael E. Thomas
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2004

/s/ Frank T. Kane
-----------------------------------
Frank T. Kane
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2004


      This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document or for any other purpose.
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-7971

NO. 2018-BA-0693

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be conditionally admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana, subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall continue to comply with the terms of the diagnostic monitoring agreement he signed with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program ("JLAP") on April 23, 2018.

2. The period of this conditional admission shall coincide with the period of petitioner's JLAP agreement. However, petitioner's conditional admission status shall not be terminated until this court so orders.

3. Petitioner shall authorize the Executive Director of JLAP to report any violations of the JLAP agreement to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC").

4. Upon the expiration of the term of petitioner's JLAP agreement, the Executive Director of JLAP shall forward to the ODC (a) a final report of petitioner's progress and participation in JLAP, and (b) a recommendation regarding the need for petitioner's continued participation in JLAP.

5. Following receipt of the report from JLAP, the ODC shall file a report in this court in which it shall recommend whether the conditional admission shall be allowed to terminate or shall be extended.

6. Petitioner shall cooperate with JLAP and the ODC, and shall comply with any and all requirements imposed upon him by JLAP and the ODC.

Should petitioner fail to make a good faith effort to satisfy these conditions, or should he commit any misconduct during the period of probation, his conditional right to practice may be terminated or he may be subjected to other discipline pursuant to the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement.

**CONDITIONAL ADMISSION GRANTED.**

CLARK, J., would deny conditional admission.
### PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band of Luisefto Mission Indians

Post Office Box 1477· Teme cul a. CA 92593 Telephone (951) 770

- 6000 Fax (951) 695

- 1778

TRIBAL COUNCIL EXECUTIVE ORDER 

### OF THE PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION

EXECUTIVE ORDER #140812-4.5 Tribal Chairman: Mark Macarro Council Memb er s: Catalina R Chacon Corrina R Garbani Sanch ez Andrew Mas iel

. S r . Rob ert "RJ. " Muno a Ru ssell "Butch " Murphy Benjamin "B en " V as quez Tribal Secret ary : Lou ise Burke

.Tribal Trea s ur er : Ch r is tin a M cMenamin

PURPOSE: to apply for Treatment in the Same Manner As A State ("TAS") Status for Clean Air Act Sections 110 and 175A for the purpose of submitting and implementing a maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard WHEREAS: 

### The Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, sometimes referred to as the Pechanga Band of Mission Indians, federally recognized as the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Indian Reservation (hereafter, "the Band") is a sovereign, federally recognized Indian tribe ; and WHEREAS: 

### The Pechanga General Membership (hereafter, " General Membership") is the governing body of the Pechanga Indian Reservation; and WHEREAS: 

### The Pechanga Tribal Council is the entity authorized pursuant to the Constitution and Bylaws of the Band to carry out executive functions oftribal government; and WHEREAS: 

### The Pechanga Tribal Council has determined that TAS status under the sections named above of the federal Clean Air Act would provide substantive and procedural advantages to the Band in its ongoing pursuit of clean air and the highest standards of environmental protection for the Pechanga Indian Reservation; and WHEREAS: 

### The Band asserts and affirms its sovereign status and powers, and the federal government's trust obligations through the exercise of government-to-government relations , as allowed under applicable law.

### THEREFORE BE IT NOW RESOLVED THAT: The Pechanga Band shall apply for and accept TAS status for Clean Air Act Sections 11 0 and 175A for the purpose of submitting and implementing a maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.



### CERTIFICATION We, the undersigned , the duly elected officers of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, do hereby certify that the foregoing Executive Order was adopted by the Pechanga Tribal Council at a duly called Tribal Council meeting conducted on August 12 ,2 014, by a vote of 

### 1. for,**~** opposed, and _1_ abstaining , and said Executive Order has not been rescinded or amended in any way.

Mark Macarro, Tribal Chairm

Andrew Masiel Sr., Councilman

BenjFmin Vasquez,

### C~

PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION Temecula Band oj Luisefto Mission Indians
STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald Dean BANDY, Jr.

NO. 2018-KK-0776

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 14, 2018

*569Writ Granted. The ruling of the trial court is reversed.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

WEIMER, J., would deny.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Stephen Rogalski, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Argued March 4, 1943;

decided April 22, 1943.

*753
      *Stephen Rogalski,*appellant in person.

*Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney General (Orrin G. Judd*and *Edward L. Ryan*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
WATERMARC FOOD MANAGEMENT CO. 10-Q FOR SECOND QUARTER OF FISCAL 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q REPORT
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          32,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,105,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    517,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,301,877
<PP&E>                                       8,372,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,853,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,546,391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    329,540
<COMMON>                                       671,682
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,484,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,853,464
<SALES>                                     10,464,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,464,021
<CGS>                                        3,133,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,070,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             294,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (774,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (774,004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (774,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
D EFENDANT /C OUNTER -P LAINTIFF ’ S N OTICE OF A PPEAL 1 CAUSE NO. 2014-01360

SARAH T. HARRIS, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT § Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant § § vs. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § JOHN W. HANKINS, § § Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff § 333 RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.1, John W. Hankins (“Hanki ns”), Defendant and CounterPlaintiff in the above-numbered and styled cause, files this his Notice of Appeal to either the

First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in H ouston, Texas. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Hankins

desires to appeal from the Order Granting Final Summary J udgment rendered in favor of

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Sara h T. Harris and against Defenda nt/Counter-Plaintiff Hankins by

the 333 rd Judicial District C ourt of Harris County, Texas, on March 26, 2015.

This Notice is timely because it has been filed within thirty days of the date the judgment

was signed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1.

Dated: April 24, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

W ILSON , C RIBBS & G OREN , P.C.

By: /s/ Brian B. Kilpatrick Brian B. Kilpatrick, TBN 24074533 Email: bkilpatrick@wcglaw.net H. Fred Cook, TBN 04732500 Email: hfcook@wcglaw.net 2500 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone (713) 222-9000 Facsimile (713) 229-8824 4/24/2015 4:55:29 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 5030802 By: Phyllis Washington Filed: 4/24/2015 4:55:29 PM

ACCEPTED 01-15-00396-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/29/2015 10:07:40 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKD EFENDANT /C OUNTER -P LAINTIFF ’ S N OTICE OF A PPEAL 2 HUGHES ELLZEY, L.L.P. Jarrett L. Ellzey, TBN 24040864 Email: jarrett@hughesellzey.com W. Craft Hughes, TBN 24046123 Email: craft@hughesellzey.com Galleria Tower I 2700 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1120 Houston, Texas 77056 Phone (713) 554-2377 Facsimile (888) 995-3335

ATTORNEYS FOR JOHN W. HANKINS,DEFENDANT & COUNTERPLAINTIFFD EFENDANT /C OUNTER -P LAINTIFF ’ S N OTICE OF A PPEAL 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served upon the following parties in accordance with Rule 21(a) of the T EXAS R ULES OF C IVIL P ROCEDURE :

Via Efile Michael J. Mazzone Mike Powell Robert A. Carlton 1221 McKinney, Suite 2100 Houston, Texas 77010-2007 Telephone (713) 547-2115 Telecopier (713) 236-5662 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Via Efile Hartley Hampton Hampton & King 3 Riverway, Suite 910 Houston, TX 77056 Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

/s/ Brian B. Kilpatrick Brian B. Kilpatrick
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Advanced Refrigeration Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), we, William Alverson, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ William Alverson
-------------------------------------
William Alverson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004
Beatriz MUNOZ, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH/CORVEL CORPORATION, Appellees.

No. 1D17-4946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2018

William F. Souza of Law Offices of William F. Souza, P.A., North Miami Beach, for Appellant.

Luis F. Estrada of Angones, McClure & Garcia, P.A., Miami, for Appellees.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.02





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders


of Homestore.com, Inc.:





Our audits of the consolidated financial
statements referred to in our report dated April 1, 2002, appearing in the Annual Report to Stockholders of Homestore.com, Inc. (which report and consolidated financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an
audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements.





/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP





Century City, California


April 1, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM  THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT  TO SECTION
               13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF 1934 FOR
               THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               6,983
<SECURITIES>                                         8,164
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,690
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    34,446
<PP&E>                                               3,609
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      52,053
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               32,667
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                14
<OTHER-SE>                                          14,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        52,053
<SALES>                                             14,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14,450
<CGS>                                                7,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        7,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (5,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (5,407)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (5,407)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.38)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Ralph C. Tobin et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Seventh Regiment Armory Building in the City of New York, Appellants, against Fiorello H. LaGuardia et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate of the City of New York, Respondents.

Submitted April 5, 1943;

decided April 15, 1943.

Motion to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 290 N. Y. 119.)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 37 (Thursday, February 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 10390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03900]



[[Page 10390]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-955]


Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: 
Scottsdale Research Institute

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Scottsdale Research Institute, has applied to be registered as 
a bulk manufacturer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). 
Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug 
information.

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), 
and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to 
the issuance of the proposed registration on or before April 25, 2022. 
Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the 
application on or before April 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this 
is notice that on January 10, 2022, Scottsdale Research Institute, 5436 
East Tapekim Road, Cave Creek, Arizona 85331, applied to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic class(es) of controlled 
substance(s):

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Drug
          Controlled substance             code          Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psilocybin..............................    7437  I
Psilocyn................................    7438  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to bulk manufacture the listed controlled 
substances for clinical trials. No other activities for these drug 
codes are authorized for this registration.

Matthew J. Strait,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-03900 Filed 2-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** 

March 6, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00066

- CR

Jesse Joe SALINAS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas Trial Court No. 12

- 11

- 00098

- CRK Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On March 4, 2014, Appellant filed several pro se documents including a motion for new trial, a motion for court

- appointed counsel on his motion for new trial, a memorandum of law supporting his appeal, and an out

- of

- time notice of appeal.
Appellant is already represented in this appeal by court

- appointed counsel: Richard Briggs, 7113 San Pedro Avenue, Box 312, San Antonio, Texas 78216.
Ap pellant does not have a right to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Taylor , 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Appellant’s pro se motions are DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court