Evaluation of Metals, Particulate Matter 

a n d PCDD/PCD F Emission s for Fixed 

Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

Jun e 2006 

RECEIVE D 

S E P 2 2Z00 6 

AIR ENFORCEMEN T BRANC H I 

U.S. EPA. REGION 5 

ENSR Corporation 

September 2006 

Document No.: 10002-017 
Prepared for: 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Sauget, Illinois 

Evaluation of Metals , Particulate Matter 

a n d PCDD/PCD F Emission s for Fixed 

Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

Jun e 200 6 

Prepared By: Jeffrey T. Gorman, Project Manager 

Revtewed By: Craig R. Doolittle, rE , Manager, Air Measurements 

ENSR Corporation 

September 2006 

Document No.: 10002-017 
ENS R 

Contents 

1.0 Introduction 1-1 

1.1 Program Summary 1-1 

2.0 Incinerator Process Description 2-1 

2.1 Process Overview 2-1 

2.2 Waste Feed Systems [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(D)(E) and (f)(1)(ii)(C)] 2-1 

2.3 Manufacturer, Make and Model of the Incinerator [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(A)] 2-1 

2.4 Air Pollution Control Equipment [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(G)] 2-2 

2.4.1 Lime System 2-2 

2.4.2 Spray Dry Absorber 2-3 

2.4.3 Fabric Filter 2-3 

2.4.4 Induced Draft Fan and Stack - 2-3 

3.0 Summary of Results 3-1 

3.1 Introduction 3-1 

3.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 3-1 

3.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals and Particulate Matter 3-1 

3.4 Metals Sample Contamination 3-2 

4.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 4-1 

4.1 Sampling Procedures 4-1 

4.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 4-1 

4.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 4-1 

4.1.3 Metals and Particulate Sampling 4-1 

4.2 Analytical Procedures 4-1 

4.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses ....„ 4-1 

4.2.2 Metals Analyses 4-2 

4.3 Process Operating Conditions 4-2 

5.0 Quality Assurance.. • •• • 5-1 

5.1 Introduction 5-1 

5.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 5-1 

5.1.2 Equipment Calibration 5-1 

5.1.3 Glassware Preparation 5-2 

C:\Oocuments and Settings\jwoodwarcN-ocal I September 2006 

Se«ngs\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 
ENS R 

List of Appendices 

Appendix A Facility Operating Data 

Appendix B Reference Method Field Data and Calculations 

Appendix C Reference Method Calibrations, Verifications, and Certifications 

Appendix D Stack Configuration, Sampling Port and Traverse Point Locations 

Appendix E Laboratory Data 

List of Tables 

Table 3-1 PCDD / PCD F Emission Results - TEQ Basis 3-3 

Table 3-2 Emission Results for LVM Metals - May 2006 , 3-4 

Table 3-3 Emission Results for LVM Metals - June 2006 3-5 

Table 3-4 Emission Results for SVM Metals and Mercury 3-6 

Table 3-5 Summary of Target Metals 3-7 

Table 3-6 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - May 2006 3-8 

Table 3-7 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - June 2006 3-9 

C:\Documerrts and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SetdngsVTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

September 2006 
ENS R 

1.0 Introduction 

1.1 Progra m Summar y 

ENS R was retained by Veolia ES Technical Solutions (Veolia), formerly Onyx Environmental 

Services to conduct stack gas emission sampling during the weeks of May 8, 2006 and June 19, 

2006. The sampling was performed on the Fixed Hearth Hazardous Waste Incinerator Unit 3 at their 

facility in Sauget, Illinois. The purpose of this Performance Test was to evaluate the performance of 

the incinerator relative to the emissions standards for existing incinerators found in 40 CF R Part 63, 

Subpart EEE (the HWC MACT regulations). To this end, the specific objectives of this Performance 

Test were to demonstrate emissions of the following pollutants: 

• Mercury 

• Low Volatile Metals (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) 

• Semi-volatile Metals (lead and cadmium) 

• Dioxins and Furans 

• Particulate Matter 

The Performance Test included feeding certain types of wastes and materials into the incinerator, 

sampling and analyzing these feedstreams, monitoring certain process parameters while 

concurrently conducting emissions testing. 

The results from this testing indicate that emissions for the above pollutants met the emission 

standards for the HWC MACT regulations. A summary of the test results can be found in Section 3 

of this report. 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Rles\0LK7C\0nyx 2006 Test 

Report, doc 

1-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

2.0 Incinerator Process Description 

2.1 Proces s Overview 

Veolia operates 2 Fixed Hearth Dual Chambered Incinerators (Units 2 and 3) and one rotary kiln 

(Unit 4) at the Sauget, IL facility. The two fixed hearth units are rated at 16 million Btu/hr each. 

Incineration Unit No. 3 is a mirror image of Unit No. 2. Both of these units have their own waste 

handling systems as described in the sections that follow. The only difference being Unit No. 2 is 

equipped with four (4) baghouse modules, while Unit No. 3 is equipped with three (3) baghouse 

modules. Unit 4 is rated at 50 million Btu/hr and is equipped with its own tank farm system, drum 

storage, bulk solids storage and feed systems. 

2.2 . Wast e Feed System s [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1)(iii)(D)(E) and (f)(1)(ii)(C)] 

Fixed hearth incinerator no. 3 is designed to receive containers, aqueous liquid wastes, organic 

liquid wastes fed through air-atomizing nozzles, specialty liquid feeds and direct inject liquids fed 

through the aqueous or organic liquid feed systems. This unit can receive any combination of 

wastes -- liquid, semi-solid, or solid - with a heat value of up to 16 million Btu/hr. 

Each of the fixed hearth incinerators are supported by storage/blend tanks located in Tank Farm #1. 

Rates of feed are controlled at each incinerator. Segregated liquid wastes are stored until utilized in 

the waste blending facilities. At that time, liquids are delivered to the blending tanks where the daily 

liquid feed to the incinerator is formulated, tested, and released to the incinerator. Blending of 

stored liquid wastes to achieve optimum heating value and viscosity for incineration takes place in 

Tanks 2, 4, 6 & 8. Six additional tanks (10,20, 30,40, 50 & 60) are used to segregate different 

waste stream types for blending of liquid feed to the incinerator. Several criteria are important in 

designing a blend from available wastes that have been segregated principally by physical and 

chemical properties. These include compatibility, proper range of heating value, and permit 

restrictions regarding elemental composition (based on emission limitations). 

In compliance with the Benzene NESHAP, all tanks are vented to individual carbon adsorption 

canisters for removal of organics before vapor is discharged to the atmosphere. Each carbon 

adsorber canister is essentially equivalent to a 55 gallon container or greater, if necessary. All tanks 

are equipped with conservation vents, in addition to the carbon canister adsorber. All tanks are 

grounded, and flame arrestors are installed between the carbon adsorbers and the tanks. 

2.3 Manufacturer, Mak e and Model of the Incinerator [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1 )(iii)(A)] 

Incinerator unit no. 3 features a two-stage combustion process. Ignition of waste material takes 

place in the primary (lower) combustion chamber. A secondary (upper) combustion chamber serves 

as an "after-burner" for process gases. Ignition of the waste takes place at temperatures in excess 

of 1,600 degrees F. The secondary combustion chamber maintains a minimum temperature of 

1,800 degrees F. These temperatures are presented in current operating conditions. 

The Series 2 incinerator has a total of two burners, one burner, a North American burner, rated at 

12.0 million Btu/hr., is used in the lower chamber to maintain temperatures. It will bum only natural 

gas or No. 2 fuel oil. A second burner is mounted in the upper chamber; it too will be used to supply 

additional heat and will be fueled with natural gas or #2 fuel oil. This burner is a North American 

C:\Documents and Setfings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

2-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

Burner, rated at 6.0 million Btu/hr. Liquid or gaseous wastes are injected through separate feed 

nozzles as described in section 2.2, above. 

The primary and secondary chambers have an external diameter of 9 feet, and are 17.5 feet long. 

The interior walls of both chambers are lined with approximately 10 inches of brick refractory and 

insulation backing, making the internal operating diameter approximately 7'2". The cross-sectional 

area of the chambers is thus 40.3 square feet. Combustion air is controlled separately in the upper 

and lower chambers. 

Following ignition of the waste material under controlled or starved-air conditions in the lower 

chamber, off-gases travel through a refractory-lined flue gas passage into the upper chamber, which 

acts as an afterburner. Turbulence is achieved by the tangential introduction of air and additional 

fuel in the upper chamber. Gas temperatures are normally maintained at 1,800-2,200 degrees F in 

the upper chamber and 1500-1900 degrees F in the lower chamber, pursuant to current Illinois EPA 

permit operating conditions. 

Leaving the upper chamber, the hot gas stream travels through 28 feet of refractory-lined stack 

sections before reaching the start of the gas scrubbing system. The combined volume of the upper 

and lower chambers, the flue gas passage and the hot crossover section is approximately 1,567 

cubic feet. The total retention time of combustion gases within the system is approximately 5 

seconds. The incinerator is rated at 16 million Btu/hr., with a design unit heat release of 

approximately 10,000 Btu per cubic foot. Maximum gas volume when firing a heat release of 16 

million Btu/hr. is about 15,000 acfm at 400 degrees F. 

2.4 Air Pollution Control Equipment [40 CF R §63.1207(f)(1 )(iii)(G)] 

The air pollution control system consists of a spray dryer absorber and fabric filter baghouse. The 

air pollution control system neutralizes acidic compounds and removes particulate from the exhaust 

gas. Two subsystems, the spray dryer absorber and the fabric filter, carry out the chemical 

neutralization and particulate removal functions, respectively. A third subsystem, the lime system, is 

used to prepare and provide lime slurry to the spray dryer absorber for use in the chemical 

neutralization process. The induced draft fan and stack provide the mechanical energy required to 

transport the flue gas through the interconnecting ductwork, to its eventual discharge point to 

atmosphere. 

2.4.1 Lime System 

The lime system prepares lime slurry for use in the chemical neutralization process in sufficient 

supply and concentration to maintain continuous flue gas treatment in the spray dryer absorber. 

The system has been designed for batch mixing to provide this service. 

Hydrated lime is stored in a storage bin above the lime preparation area. The storage bin is sized to 

hold enough hydrated lime to maintain several days of system operation at the maximum 

combustion rate of the incinerator. Lime is discharged through the conical storage bin bottom. The 

flow of the material from the bin is aided by a vibrating "live bottom," or bin activator. A variable 

speed rotary feeder is used to meter the hydrated lime in the proportions required for batch mixing 

lime slurry. The lime is mixed with water in a tank beneath the lime storage bin. The rotary feeder 

speed and the rate that water is added to the lime slurry tank are variable so that the desired 20% 

lime solids concentration can be achieved in the tank. The variable feed adjustments allow water 

and lime to be added to the lime slurry tank at a rate that will allow a batch mode of mixing. An 

agitator is provided in the slurry tank to mix the water and lime and to maintain the suspension of 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwcodward\L.ocal 

Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

2-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

lime solids. The mixed lime slurry is pumped at a continuous rate of flow through a recirculation 

loop to the atomizer. 

2.4.2 Spray Dry Absorber 

Slurry flow to the spray dryer absorber is metered by a flow control valve to obtain the proper feed 

concentration to the spray dryer absorber atomizer. Automatic (or manual) adjustment to the flow is 

made as a function of the output from a hydrochloric acid (HCI) analyzer in the gas duct downstream 

of the Fabric filter. The amount of slurry metered is proportional to the amount of HCI monitored. 

The slurry passes through a stationary swirl-type liquid distributor into the atomizer wheel where 

induced centrifugal force from the rapidly spinning wheel discharges the slurry through the wheel 

nozzles at high velocity. The design of the atomizer wheel, its rate of spin, and the discharge 

velocity of the slurry, create a cloud of finely divided droplets around the periphery of the atomizer 

wheel. A feedback signal from the atomizer power transmitter provides verification that water flow to 

the atomizer increases or decreases in proportion to the spray dryer absorber outlet temperature. 

Flue gas enters from the bottom of the spray dryer absorber through a vertical, centrally located 

disperser. The disperser directs the flue gas through the zone filled by the atomized slurry cloud 

where the flue gas and slurry mix, and most of the absorption occurs. 

The spray dryer absorber features a two-point product discharge. A portion of the dried spent 

chemicals and ash settle to the bottom of the chamber. This material is discharged at the base of 

the powder discharge cone. It then passes through a lump breaker which reduces large 

agglomerations of material to a manageable size. Finally, it is discharged through a rotary valve to 

the conveying system. The remainder of the spent chemicals is carried from the module entrained in 

the flue gas. 

2.4.3 Fabric Filter 

Gas exhausted from the spray dryer absorber is distributed by manifold ducts to three fabric filter 

modules at Unit 3. Within each filter module, the gas is passed through Teflon-coated fiberglass 

cloth bags. The gas passes from the outside to the inside of the filter bags. Particulate, entrained in 

the gas stream, is mechanically deposited on the outside of the filter bags as the gas passes 

through the cloth. 

The fabric filter cleaning mechanism utilizes jets of air to clean the filter bags. Periodically, the 

cleaning sequence will be initiated. The sequence is either started at the end of a timed cycle, or 

when the differential pressure across the filter reaches a predetermined setpoint of approximately 

7.0" w.c. The controller then sequences to each row of filter bags in each module, releasing a burst 

of air opposite to the direction of gas flow. The quickly released burst of air dislodges dust cake on 

the exterior of each bag as it travels from the top to the bottom of the bags. Released from the bag, 

the dust cake falls by gravity into the hopper at the bottom of the module. 

The dust cleaned from the filter bags is removed at the base of the hopper through a rotary valve for 

discharge to the conveying system. Treated by the spray dryer absorber and filtered by the fabric 

filter, the cleaned flue gas exits the fabric filter modules to an outlet manifold for exhaust. 

2.4.4 Induced Draft Fan and Stack 

The induced draft fan and stack are located downstream of the fabric filter. Combustion gases are 

drawn through the system by a 75 hp induced draft (ID) fan, rated at 15,000 acfm at 400° F 

saturated, and 22" water column pressure. The induced draft fan provides the mechanism for 

C:\Documents and Setlings\jWoodward\Local 

SetSngsYTemporary Internet Rles\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

2-3 September 2006 
ENS R 

transporting the incinerator flue gas through the spray dryer absorber, Fabric filter, and all 

interconnecting ducts. The velocity of the gas within the ducting and treatment devices is regulated 

by the damper associated with the fan. Treated gasses exhausted from the induced draft fan to the 

atmosphere through a 90-ft. high stack. The stack diameter for Unit 3 is 39 inches I.D. The stack is 

equipped with instrument sampling ports and a sampling platform for emissions testing. Appendix D 

provides details on the design and sample port locations and configurations for Unit 3. 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SetSngsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

2-4 September 2006 
3.0 Summary of Results 

ENS R 

3.1 Introduction 

This section summarizes the test program results. Appendix B presents copies of ENSR' s field data 

and calculations. Emission data is summarized in this section and feed and process operating data 

are included in Appendix A. 

3.2 Stac k Emission Result s for PCDDs/PCDF s 

Method 0023A required separate analysis of the front-half and back-half sample train fractions. 

Program samples were submitted to Alta Analytical Laboratories in El Dorado Hills, CA for all 

analysis of all target parameters. A summary of the PCDD/PCDF emission results on a TEQ basis 

for Unit 3 are included in Table 3-1. 

• The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 3 (average emissions for runs 1, 2 and 3 were 0.024 

ng/m3 @ 7% 02 ) are below the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.2 ng/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

3.3 Stac k Emission Result s for Target Metals and Particulate Matter 

A summary of the metals and particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 is included in Tables 3-2 

through 3-7. Tables 3-2 and 3-3 provide a detailed summary of the Low Volatile Metals (LVM) 

emissions from the May 2006 and June 2006 testing. A detailed summary of metals emissions 

categorized by Semi-volatile Metals (SVM) and mercury is provided in Table 3-4. Table 3-5 provides 

a summary of all six target metals. Tables 3-6 and 3-7 summarize the particulate matter emissions 

from the May 2006 and June 2006 testing. 

. The LVM metals emissions for Unit 3 from the May 2006 testing (average emissions for runs 1, 2 

and 3 were 249 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for LVMs) were higher than the HWC MACT emission standards 

of 97 pg/m3; 

. The LVM metals emissions for Unit 3 from the June 2006 testing (average emissions for runs 1, 

2 and 3 were 7.61 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for LVMs) were lower than the HWC MACT emission 

standards of 97 pg/m3; 

• The SV M and mercury emissions for Unit 3 (average for runs 1, 2 and 3 were 16.6 pg/m3 @ 7% 

02f or SVMs and 61.5 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for mercury) were below the HWC MACT emission 

standards of and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 02 ) and 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for SVMs and 

mercury respectively; 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 from the May 2006 testing (average emissions for 

runs 1, 2 and 3 were 6.39 mg/m3 @ 7% 02 ) is below the HWC MACT emission standard of 34 

mg/m3 @ 7% 02 ; 

. The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 from the June 2006 testing (average emissions for 

runs 1, 2 and 3 were 2.66 mg/m3 @ 7% 02 ) is below the HWC MACT emission standard of 34 

mg/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodwara\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

3-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

3.4 Metals Sampl e Contamination 

During the May 2006 testing, high arsenic levels, which were inconsistent among the three runs, 

were detected in sample results from the Method 29 train. A detailed review was conducted by both 

ENSR and Veolia personnel to assess possible causes and/or sources of cross contamination. This 

review included: 

• Sample train clean-up and preparation procedures 

• Sample port access and preparation for sampling 

• Sampling anomalies (i.e., observations of filter, sample train and procedures) 

• Lab contamination or incorrect results (duplicate samples were analyzed at a separate 

laboratory) 

• Operating or equipment issues that could have caused non-representative particulate matter 

containing high arsenic to be collected in the sample train 

It was concluded that there was cross-contamination of the sample train during sampling that was 

most likely caused by dislodgement and re-entrainment in the flue gas of scale that had built up on 

the inside of the stack sample port over time, causing a non-representative result. Also, during this 

review it was determined that the number of traverse points for the ports used for the dioxin and 

furan sampling was incorrect based on Method 1 criteria, although results were well within the 

MACT emission standards. 

As a result, Unit 3 was re-tested in June to further evaluate low volatile metal and dioxin and furan 

emissions performance. Ports were cleaned prior to testing and the correct number of traverse 

points was used for the selected sampling locations. Dioxin and furan results were again well within 

the emission standard. Low volatile metal results were also well within the emission standard. 

C:\Documents and SetBngs\jwoodward\Local 

Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-1 PCD D / PCDF Emission Results - TEQ Basi s 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

Start Time 14:40 09:30 09:30 

Stop Time 17:59 13:05 11:43 

Units 

Sample Volume dscf 128.363 129.710 126.379 

Sample Volume m

3 3.63 3.67 3.58 

Moisture Content % v/v 44.4 47.7 45.6 

0 2 Concentration % v/v (dry) 10.00 8.20 9.60 

C 0 2 Concentration % v/v (dry) 7.40 7.60 7.40 

Isokinetics % 99 104 100 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,441 5,212 5,280 

PCDD/PCD F pg ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

pg ng/m3 

Parameters TEF a T EQ T EQ T EQ 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 1.0 0 - 0.00 O.OE+00 3.44 9.4E-04 0.00 0.0E+00 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.50 17.0 2.3E-03 17.6 2.4E-03 16.7 2.3E-03 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 19.1 5.3E-04 16.8 4.6E-04 14.6 4.1 E-04 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.10 46.1 1.3E-03 34.7 9.4E-04 35.7 1 .OE-03 

1 2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.10 37.0 1 .OE-03 27.1 7.4E-04 26.3 7.3E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 190

 1 5.2E-04 175 4.8E-04 156.0 4.4E-04 

OCDD 0.001 247 " 6.8E-05 175 4.8E-05 151 4.2E-05 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.10 30 8.1 E-04 32.8 8.9E-04 31.8 8.9E-04 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 36

 1 4.9E-04 41 5.6E-04 41 5.7E-04 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.50 65 9.0E-03 70 9.6E-03 76 1.1 E-02 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 36 1 9.9E-04 33 9.0E-04 38 1.1 E-03 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 32~1 8.8E-04 32 8.6E-04 -34 9.4E-04 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.10 44 1.2E-03 42 1.1 E-03 45 1.3E-03 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.10 10 2.8E-04 12 3.2E-04 11 3.1 E-04 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 78 2.1 E-04 67 1.8E-04 71 2.0E-04 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 8 2.2E-05 5 1.4E-05 7 2.0E-05 

OCD F 0.001 20 5.6E-06 15 4.0E-06 13 3.7E-06 

Total TEQ s (ng/m3) — 0.020 0.020 0.021 

Total TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % 02 ) = 0.025 0.022 0.026 

% of Standard

 b = 12% 1 1% 13% 

a

 U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

b

 PCDD/PCDF Standard = 0.20 ng/dscm @ 7% Q2 

C:\Documents and Settmgs\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-3 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-2 Emission Results for LVM Metals - May 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date lO-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters « 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered dcf 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Moisture % v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

0 2 at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 10.00 10.60 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381 371 371 375 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Arsenic (As) ~ LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 8.50 248 945 401 

Stack Cone. @ 7% Oz pg/m3 6.14 126 557 230 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 7.88E-05 2.22E-03 8.34E-03 3.55E-03 

g/sec 9.92E-06 2.80E-04 1.05E-03 4.47E-04 

Beryllium (Be) -- LVM 

Quantity Collected M9 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.06 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.27E-07 8.96E-07 8.82E-07 9.02E-07 

g/sec 1.17E-07 1.13E-07 1.11E-07 0.00 

Total Chromium (Cr) -- LVM 

Quantity Collected 16.7 28.0 54.8 33.2 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 12.1 14.2 32.3 19.5 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.55E-04 2.51 E-04 4.83E-04 2.96E-04 

g/sec 1.95E-05 3.16E-05 6.09E-05 0.00 

C:\Documents and Set8ngs\jwcodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

3-4 September 2 006 
ENS R 

Table 3-3 Emission Results for LVM MefaSs - June 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10.06 

Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters --

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Moisture % v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 388 386 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Arsenic (As) — LVM 

Quantity Collected ug 5.53 3.69 5.20 4.81 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 3.44 1.86 2.98 2.76 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 4.79E-05 3.14E-05 4.65E-05 4.19E-05 

g/sec 6.03E-06 3.95E-06 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) — LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 0.00 0.0870 0.00 0.0290 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.00 0.0439 0.00 0.0146 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr O.OOE+00 7.39E-07 0.0OE+00 2.46E-07 

g/sec 0.00E+00 9.32E-08 0.00E+00 3.11E-08 

Total Chromium (Cr) « LVM 

Quantity Collected pg 9.91 3.85 11.2 8.30 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 6.17 1.94 6.40 4.84 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 8.58E-05 3.27E-05 9.98E-05 7.28E-05 

g/sec 1.08E-05 4.12E-06 1.26E-05 9.17E-06 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-5 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-4 Emission Results for SV M Metals and Mercury 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 10-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters -

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered dcf 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Moisture % v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

0 2 at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 10.00 10.60 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381 371 371 375 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Cadmium (Cd) - S V M 

Quantity Collected ug 0.34 1.04 2.42 1.27 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.25 0.53 1.43 0.73 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.15E-06 9.31 E-06 2.14E-05 1.13E-05 

g/sec 3.97E-07 1.17E-06 2.69E-06 0.00 

Lead (Pb) -- S V M 

Quantity Collected pg 21.2 19.6 37.9 26.2 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 15.3 9.9 22.3 15.9 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.96E-04 1.76E-04 3.34E-04 2.35E-04 

g/sec 2.47E-05 2.21 E-05 4.21 E-05 2.97E-05 

Mercury (He) - V M 

Quantity Collected pg 97.3 121 89.4 103 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 70.3 61.5 52.7 61.5 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 9.01 E-04 1.09E-03 7.88E-04 9.25E-04 

cj/sec 1.14E-04 1.37E-04 9.93E-05 1.17E-04 

C:\Documents and Seffings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

ReDOrt.doc 

3-6 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-5 Summary of Target Metals 

L o w Volatile Metal s Emissions - micrograms/m 3 

May 2006 Test 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

As 6.14 126 557 230 

Be 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.06 

Cr 12.05 14.2 32.3 19.5 

Total LVM 18.3 140 589 249 

June 2006 Test 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

As 3.4 1.9 2.98 2.8 

Be 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.01 

Cr 6.17 1.94 6.40 4.84 

Total LVM 9.61 3.85 9.38 7.61 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m 3 

Semi-Volatil e M etal Em i ssions - micrograms/m 3 

Metals Runl Run 2 Run 3 Average 

Pb 15.3 9.9 22.3 15.9 

Cd 0.25 0.53 1.43 0.73 

Total SVM 15.6 10.5 23.8 16.6 

SVM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 

Mercur y Emissions - micrograms/m 3 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

Hg 70.3 61.5 52.7 61.5 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 

C:\Documents and SetSngs\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7CYOnyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-7 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-6 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - May 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 10-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Samolinq Parameters ~ 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Volume Metered dcf 81.991 84.128 81.699 82.606 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 79.526 83.462 80.402 81.130 

Moisture % v/v 44.4 44.8 44.1 44.4 

02 at Stack %dry 12.50 9.40 10.00 10.63 

C 02 at Stack %dry 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 376 366 364 369 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,468 5,483 5,287 5,413 

Isokinetics % 109 100 100 103 

Particulate Emission Results -

Front Half Rinse g 0.0031 0.0066 0.0058 0.0052 

Particulate Filter g 0.0030 0.0081 0.0071 0.0061 

Total Particulate mg 6.10 14.7 12.9 11.2 

PM Loading @ 7% 02 mg/dscm 4.46 7.51 7.21 6.39 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0012 0.0027 0.0025 0.0021 

Grain Loading @ 7% 02 gr/dscf 0.0019 0.0033 0.0031 0.0028 

3

 Particulate Matter Standard = 34 mg/dscm @ 7% 02 

C:\Documertts and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SettmgsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-8 September 2006 
ENS R 

Table 3-7 Emission Results for Particulate Matter - June 2006 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters --

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Volume of Gas Collected dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Moisture % v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386 388 386 387 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 L 106 101 ^ 104 

Particulate Emission Results -

Front Half Rinse g 0.0040 0.0028 0.0017 0.0 

Particulate Filter g 0.0022 0.0017 0.0016 0.0 

Total Particulate mg 6.20 4.46 3.25 4.64 

PM Loading @ 7% 0 2 mg/dscm 3.86 2.25 1.87 2.66 

Grain Loading gr/dscf 0.0013 0.00090 0.00066 0.0010 

Grain Loading @ 7% 0 2 gr/dscf 0.0017 0.0010 0.0008 0.0012 

a

 Particulate Matter Standard = 34 mg/dscm @ 7% Q2 

C:\Documents and Seffings\jwcodward\Local 

SettmgsYremporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2 006 Test 

Reportdoc 

3-9 September 2 006 
ENS R 

4.0 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

4.1 Sampling Procedures 

Several different sampling and monitoring techniques were used to provide the required data to 

meet the goals of this test program. Three (3) runs each were conducted on Unit 3 for EPA Method 

0023A, EPA Method 29, and EPA Method 5. The sampling activities described below were 

conducted during all runs. All field activities were documented in accordance with EPA accepted 

procedures and copies of all field notes and data sheets are included in Appendix B of this report. 

4.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 

Gas stream velocity and temperature were determined in conjunction with each manual sampling 

method. A type "S" pitot tube connected to an inclined water manometer was used to determine 

velocity head of the flue gas at each duct traverse point as specified in EPA Reference Method 2. 

The temperature profile of the flue gas at each duct traverse point was obtained by taking readings 

with a thermocouple and pyrometer concurrent with the velocity head measurements. Moisture 

content was determined as specified in EPA Method 4. Velocity and temperature measurement 

profiles were established prior to testing to aid in sample train set-up. Samples for the determination 

of the fixed gas composition were collected using the integrated bag technique detailed in EPA 

Reference Method 3. 

4.1.2 PCDD/PCD F Sampling 

Sampling for dioxins and furans was completed in accordance with EPA Method 23A (40 CF R 60, 

Appendix A). Each sampling run was 192 minutes in duration covering 16 sampling points at 12 

minutes per point. 

4.1.3 Metals and Particulate Sampling 

The EPA Multiple Metals Train (EPA Method 29, 40 CFR 60 Appendix A) was utilized during the 

testing program for the collection of the following metals: arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, 

lead, and mercury. Prior to metals analyses the tared filter and front half acetone rinse were 

analyzed gravimetrically for particulate matter in accordance with EPA RM 5. Each run was 120 

minutes in duration covering 16 sampling points at 7.5 minutes per point. 

4.2 Analytical Procedures 

4.2.1 PCDD/PCD F Analyses 

PCDD/PCD F analyses were performed by Alta Analytical Laboratory, Inc. in El Dorado Hills, CA. 

Sample fractions were extracted, concentrated and analyzed by EPA Method 8290 (High 

Resolution Gas Chromatograph / High Resolution Mass Spectrophotometer (HRGC/HRMS)). The 

train fractions recovered for analysis of PCDDs/PCDFs include the front half rinse, the particulate 

filter, the back half rinse and the XAD resin trap. The analytical results for the front half and back 

half fractions were analyzed and reported separately. 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

4-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

4.2.2 Metals Analyses 

Metals analyses for the waste feed samples were completed using two separate procedures. First, 

samples were prepared and analyzed for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, and lead as 

specified in EP A Method 6020 (ICP-MS), SW846,3r d Edition. Mercury was analyzed via method 

7471 A. Metals analyses were performed by Maxxam Analytical Inc. of Burlington, Ontario 

(Canada). 

4.3 Proces s Operating Conditions 

Throughout the field program, detailed process information was collected continuously by the 

facility's process control computers and data acquisition system (DAS). Process data including 

minimum, maximum and average values for key process variables recorded during each test 

condition. In general, target-operating conditions specified were achieved. 

C:\Documents and Set6ngs\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsVremporary Internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

4-2 September 2006 
ENS R 

5.0 QuaSfty Assurance 

5.1 Introduction 

This section presents the results of all QA/QC measures implemented during the field sampling 

program and all phases of subsequent analysis. Data generated for the program are judged to be 

valid as overall accuracy and precision results are consistent with general objectives. Analytical 

QA/QC data are presented to support all sample results used for determining compliance with 

performance criteria or emission standards. Throughout the overall program, all sampling was 

performed using sampling protocols described herein and approved by USEPA and the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency. 

5.1.1 Pre-Sampling Activities 

Pre-sampling activities included equipment calibration, sample media preparation, cleaning of 

sample train glassware, preparation of computer-generated sample labels and other miscellaneous 

tasks. Each of these activities are described or referenced in the following subsections. Other presampling activities included such details as team meetings, equipment packing and shipment, 

equipment setup, and finalization of all details leading up to the coordinated initiation of the sampling 

program. 

5.1.2 Equipment Calibration 

A most important aspect of pre-sampling preparations was the inspection and calibration of all 

equipment used for the field effort. Equipment was inspected for proper operation and durability 

prior to calibration. Calibration of equipment was conducted in accordance with the procedures 

outlined in the EPA document entitled "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement 

Systems; Volume III—Stationary Source Specific Methods" (EPA-600/4-77-027b). Equipment 

calibration was performed in accordance with EPA guidelines and/or manufacturer's 

recommendations. Copies of theses calibrations are presented in Appendix C. Examples of field 

equipment used and typical calibration requirements follows: 

• PROB E NOZZLE S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pg. 19) - measurements of the nozzle ID (to 

the nearest 0.001-in.) along three different diameters with a micrometer. Difference between 

the high and low values should not exceed 0.004 in. Post-test checks - inspect for damage. 

• PITO T TUBE S (QA Handbook Section 3.1.2, pp. 1-13) - measured for appropriate spacing and 

dimensions or calibrate in a wind tunnel. Rejection criteria given on the calibration sheet. 

Post-test checks - inspect for damage. 

• THERMOCOUPLE S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 15-18) - verify against a mercury-in-glass 

thermometer at two or more points including the anticipated measurement range. 

Acceptance limits - impinger ±2°F; DG M ±5.4°F; stack ±1.5 percent of stack temperature. 

• D R Y GA S METER S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 1-12) - calibrate against a wet test meter. 

Acceptance criteria - pretest Yi = Y ± 0.2; post test Y = ± 0.05 Yi. 

• FIEL D BAROMETER S (QA Handbook Section 3.4.2, pp. 18-19) - compare against a mercuryin-glass barometer or use Airport Station BP and correct for elevation. Acceptance criteria -

± 0.02 in. Hg; post-test checks - same. 

C:\Doouments and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

Settings\Temporary internet Files\OLK7C\Onyx 2006 Test 

Report.doc 

5-1 September 2006 
ENS R 

5.1.3 Glassware Preparation 

Sample train glassware and sample containers required specialized pre-cleaning to avoid 

contamination of the sample from the collection container or devices. Cleaning/storage procedures 

for sample train glassware are summarized below. Note that all bottle caps are fitted with Teflon 

liners, which were cleaned in the same manner as the bottles themselves. Sample containers used 

for waste feed streams are purchased pre-cleaned and sealed to specified EPA protocols. 

• EP A METHO D 0010 / 0023A GLASSWAR E AN D CONTAINER S (PCDDs/PCDFs ) - washed with 

soap and water, rinsed three times with deionized (DI) water, baked at 400°C for 2-hours, 

rinsed three times with pesticide grade methylene chloride, rinsed three times with pesticide 

grade toluene and air dry. 

• EP A METHO D 5/29/ 0060 GLASSWAR E AN D CONTAINER S (METAL S AN D PARTICULAT E MATTER ) 

- washed with soap and water, rinsed with hot tap water and rinsed three times with reagent 

water. The glassware was soaked in a 10% nitric acid solution for a minimum of 4-hours, 

rinsed three times with reagent water, rinsed a final time with acetone and air-dried. All 

glassware openings where contamination can occur are covered with Parafilm until the 

sampling train was assembled prior to sampling. 

5.1.3.1 Sample Media Preparation 

All reagents were checked in accordance with ENSR' s existing Q C Program to minimize the 

probability of using contaminated solvents. This included the use of the proper grade 

reagents/solvents as specified in the test method, selection of reagents from the same lot and 

collection and analysis of the appropriate blanks. Sampling media was procured and prepared in 

accordance with the appropriate test methods as described below: 

• XAD resin used in the Method 0023A train was purchased new and packed in specially 

designed sorbent traps. All glass cleaning and sorbent packing procedures followed the 

protocols specified in EPA Method 0023A. 

• Quartz filters used in the Method 5/ 29 / 0060 sampling train were supplied by Maxxam 

Analytics, Inc. who pre-screen filters for metals content. 

C:\Documents and Settings\jwoodward\Local 

SettingsYTemporary Internet Files\0l_K7C\0nyx 2006 Test 

Reportdoc 

5-2 September 2006 
ENSR 

Appendix A 

Facility Operating Data 

S:\_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performanoe Test\Report\Onyx 2006 

Test Report.doc 

September 2006 
Unit #3 

Run #1 

Date: 05/10/06 

Test Time: 09:47 to 13:51 

Run Length: 199 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 6820 0.5 0.3 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.33 0.05 2.5 ! 5 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 85.5 0.1 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.05 2.5 -I 5 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 23.4 0.13 2.5 1 1.3 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 81.8 0.21 20.1 1 8.6 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 66.4 0.13 630000 208 6 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 96.3 0.13 2.5 1 5 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 600 2.5 1 5 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

PPM Feed rate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

lium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 2.5 982 6.70 4.91 2.95 0.000128 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1715 0.86 8.58 5.66 0.000086 0.00 

0.1 2.5 117 0.06 100.04 0.12 0.000015 0.00 

0.1 2.5 458 0.23 2.29 0.46 0.000023 0.00 

0.1 180000 251 0.13 1.26 58.73 0.000033 0.00 

0.29 26.1 619 0.31 3.10 506.34 0.000130 0.01 

0.1 2.5 92 0.05 0.46 61.09 0.000012 57.96 

0.1 2.5 138 0.07 87.63 132.89 0.000018 0.00 

0.1 2.5 1.35 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000810 0.00 

4373 8.39 208.26 768.24 0.00125 57.98 
Cadmium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.02 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

45.18 

0.02 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.02 0.02 0.00 45.20 
Unit #3 

Run #2 

Date: 05/10/06 

Test Time: 14:51 to 18:17 

Run Length: 206 minutes 

PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury 

PCC High Btu 6720 0.56 0.28 0.13 

PCC Low Btu 

(Chlorine Spike) 

500 

500 

0.5 

85.5 

0.32 

0.1 

0.05 

0.13 

PCC Sp Fdr 

(Chromium Spike) 

500 

500 

0.5 

0.5 

0.1 

23.4 

0.05 

0.13 

PCC Solid Charges 

(Lead Spike) 

(Chlorine Spike) 

(Mercury Spike) 

500 

500 

500 

500 

0.5 

0.5 

635 

0.5 

82 

66.4 

96.3 

0.1 

0.19 

0.13 

0.13 

600 

PPM PPM PPM 

Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

2.5 1 5 

2.5 1 5 

2.5 1 5 

2.5 1 5 

2.5 1 2.6 

19.6 1 9.5 

630000 221 1.6 

2.5 1 5 

2.5 1 5 

Totals 
PPM PPM 

Beryllium Chromium 

Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury 

Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

Lead 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.1 2.5 992 6.67 5.56 2.78 0.000129 

0.1 2.5 1681 0.84 8.41 5.38 0.000084 

0.1 2.5 100 0.05 85.50 0.10 0.000013 

0.1 2.5 461 0.23 2.31 0.46 0.000023 

0.1. 180000 255 0.13 1.28 59.67 0.000033 

0.43 28.1 719 0.36 3.60 589.58 0.000137 

0.1 2.5 108 0.05 0.54 71.71 0.000014 

0.1 2.5 161 0.08 102.24 155.04 0.000021 

0.1 2.5 1.58 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000948 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

68.04 

0.00 

0.00 

4479 8.41 209.42 884.72 0.00140 68.06 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 45.90 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02 

0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.03 0.02 0.00 45.93 
Unit #3 

Run #3 

Date: 05/11/06 

Test Time: 11:25 to 14:48 

Run Length: 203 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 7630 0.66 0.28 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.31 0.05 2.5 ! 5 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 85.5 0.1 0.13 2.5 1 5 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.05 2.5 1 5 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 23.4 0.13 2.5 1 2 

PCC Solid Charges 500 0.5 82.6 0.35 36.8 ! 11.2 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 66.4 0.13 630000 283 9.1 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 96.3 0.13 150 1 5 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 600 2.5 1 5 

Totals 
PPM PPM 

Beryllium Chromium 

Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 2.5 1000 7.63 6.60 2.80 0.000130 

0.1 2.5 1931 0.97 9.66 5.99 0.000097 

0.1 2.5 92 0.05 78.66 0.09 0.000012 

0.1 2.5 448 0.22 2.24 0.45 0.000022 

0.1 180000 245 0.12 1.23 57.33 0.000032 

0.9 26.3 723 0.36 3.62 597.20 0.000253 

0.1 1.3 106 0.05 0.53 70.38 0.000014 

0.1 2.5 158 0.08 100.33 152.15 0.000021 

0.1 2.5 1.55 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.000930 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

66.78 

0.02 

0.00 

4705 9.48 202.86 886.39 0.00151 66.84 
Cadmium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

44.10 

0.02 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.03 0.03 0.00 44.13 
Unit #3 

Run #1 

Date: 06/19/06 

Test Time: 14:40 to 18:05 

Run Length: 205 minutes 

Waste Type 

PCC High Btu 

PCC Low Btu 

(Chlorine Spike) 

P CC Sp Fdr 

(Chromium Spike) 

P CC Solid Charges 

(Lead Spike) 

(Chlorine Spike) 

(Mercury Spike) 

Btu/lb %Chlorine 

9930 

500 

3170 

3.2 

0.5 

85.5 

PPM 

%Ash Mercury 

PPM PPM PPM 

Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

1.5 

0.2 

0.1 

0.413 

0.0202 

0.011 

18.8 

1.27 

0.1 

1.98 

0.0372 

0.02 

2.5 

0.272 

0.2 

500 0.5 0.1 0.00035 1.38 0.0052 12.1 

500 0.5 25.9 0.002 800 970 880 

880 0.6 70.6 0.025 12.93 0.30 6.73 

500 0.5 65.6 0.02 630000 27 25 

500 63.5 97.4 0.02 170 5 25 

500 0.5 0.1 646 0.1 0.02 0.2 

Totals 
PPM PPM 

Beryllium Chromium 

0.1 13.3 

0.001 0.462 

0.05 0.04 

0.01 0.0121 

960 180000 

0.37 157.81 

4.8 2 

2.5 2 

0.05 0.04 

Average Thermal Chlorine 

Feedrate Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) 

1110 11.02 35.52 

1896 0.95 9.48 

95 0.30 81.23 

569 0.28 2.85 

251 0.13 1.26 

798 0.70 4.71 

119 0.06 0.60 

179 ' 0.09 113.67 

1.75 0.00 0.01 

5019 13.53 249.30 

Ash Mercury Lead 

Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

16.65 0.000458 0.02 

3.79 0.000038 0.00 

0.10 0.000001 0.00 

0.57 0.000000 0.00 

65.01 0.000001 0.20 

563.74 0.000020 0.01 

78.06 0.000002 74.97 

174.35 0.000004 0.03 

0.00 0.001131 0.00 

902.27 0.00166 75.24 
Cadmium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.24 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Arsenic 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.22 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Beryllium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.24 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Chromium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

45.18 

0.13 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.25 0.24 0.24 45.32 
Unit #3 

Run #2 

Date: 06/20/06 

Test Time: 09:30 to 13:05 

Run Length: 215 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 9000 2.3 4.9 0.413 4 0.35 2.5 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.2 0.00192 0.04 0.0034 0.253 

(Chlorine Spike) 3170 85.5 0.1 0.014 0.1 0.02 0.2 

PCC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.0002 0.0914 0.002 0.186 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 25.9 0.002 100 20 200 

PCC Solid Charges 824 0.6 69.9 0.038 16.45 0.37 6.25 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 65.6 0.02 630000 32 25 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 97.4 0.02 42 5 25 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 646 0.1 0.02 0.2 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine Ash Mercury Lead 

PPM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading 

Beryllium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 13 1126 10.13 25.90 55.17 0.000465 0.00 

0.001 0.0579 1959 0.98 9.80 3.92 0.000004 0.00 

0.05 0.046 102 0.32 87.21 0.10 0.000001 0.00 

0.001 0.0116 543 0.27 2.72 0.54 0.000000 0.00 

50 180000 250 0.13 1.25 64.75 0.000001 0.03 

0.31 11.88 805 0.66 4.96 563.01 0.000030 0.01 

7.8 2 117 0.06 0.59 76.75 0.000002 73.71 

2.5 2 176 0.09 111.76 171.42 0.000004 0.01 

0.05 0.04 1.72 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.001111 0.00 

5080 12.64 244.18 935.67 0.00162 73.76 
Cadmium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Arsenic 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.05 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Beryllium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

Chromium 

Loading 

(Ib/hr) 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

45.00 

0.01 

0.00 

0.00 

0.00 

0.01 0.07 0.01 45.02 
Unit #3 

Run #3 

Date: 06/21/06 

Test Time: 09:30 to 13:19 

Run Length: 229 minutes 

PPM PPM PPM PPM 

Waste Type Btu/lb %Chlorine %Ash Mercury Lead Cadmium Arsenic 

PCC High Btu 10220 3.1 0.4 0.679 3.85 0.83 6.77 

PCC Low Btu 500 0.5 0.2 0.00184 0.04 0.0054 0.257 

(Chlorine Spike) 3170 85.5 0.1 0.0045 0.1 0.02 0.2 

P CC Sp Fdr 500 0.5 0.1 0.0002 0.0432 0.002 0.0709 

(Chromium Spike) 500 0.5 25.9 0.002 100 20 200 

PCC Solid Charges 793 0.5 70.8 0.157 18.46 0.44 5.76 

(Lead Spike) 500 0.5 65.6 0.02 630000 42 25 

(Chlorine Spike) 500 63.5 97.4 0.02 18 5 25 

(Mercury Spike) 500 0.5 0.1 646 0.1 0.02 0.2 

Totals 
Average Thermal Chlorine 

PPM PPM Feedrate Loading Loading 

Beryllium Chromium (Ib/hr) (MMBtu/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.1 5.74 1079 11.03 33.45 

1.001 0.0586 2039 1.02 10.20 

0.05 0.04 96 0.30 82.08 

).O01 0.0408 547 0.27 2.73 

50 180000 249 0.12 1.25 

0.35 12.47 815 0.65 4.31 

8.1 2 119 0.06 0.60 

2.5 2 178 0.09 113.03 

0.05 0.04 1.74 0.00 0.01 

5124 13.55 247.65 

Ash Mercury Lead 

Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (lb/hr) (Ib/hr) 

4. .32 0. .000733 0.00 

4. ,08 0. .000004 0.00 

0 .10 0, .000000 0.00 

0. .55 0 .000000 0.00 

64. .49 0, .000000 0.02 

577, .29 0 .000128 0.02 

78, ,06 0 .000002 74.97 

173, .37 0 .000004 0.00 

0, .00 0 .001124 0.00 

902 .25 0.00200 75.02 
Cadmium Arsenic Beryllium Chromium 

Loading Loading Loading Loading 

(Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) (Ib/hr) 

0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.05 0.01 44.82 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

0.01 0.07 0.01 44.84 
Baghouse Inlet Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

PCC Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

SCC Temp. (Deg F) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

Stackflow (ACFM) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's of each test run) 

Pumpable Waste Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's of each test run) 

(Includes average spiked liquids flows) 

Total Waste Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of max. HRA's of each test run) 

(Includes average spiked liquids flows) 

Mercury Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

Ash Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

LVM Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

SVM Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

Chlorine Feed (Lb/hr) 

(Ave. of test run ave.'s) 

Unit 3 Operating Parameter s 

June, 2006 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

420 421 421 420 

1735 1725 1741 1734 

1845 1850 1851 1849 

14888 15349 15267 15168 

4147 4161 4172 4160 

346 352 345 na 

5273 5367 5391 5344 

346 352 345 na 

0.0017 0.0016 0.0020 0.0018 

902 936 902 913 

46 45 45 45 

75 74 75 75 

249 244 248 247 
Uni t 3 Operating Parameter s 

May , 2006 

Run 1 

420 

1713 

1845 

14873 

3718 

368 

AIM 

368 

0.0013 

768 

45 

58 

208 

Run 2 

420 

1715 

1845 

15428 

3683 

355 

4862 

355 

0.0014 

885 

46 

68 

209 

Run 3 

420 

1712 

1846 

14468 

3800 

337 

4793 

337 

0.0015 

886 

44 

67 

203 

Average 

420 

1713 

1845 

14923 

3734 

na 

4791 

na 

0.0014 

846 

45 

64 

207 
ENS R 

Appendix B 

Reference Method Field Data and Calculations 

S:\_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performance Test\Report\Onyx 2006 

Test Report.doc 

September 2006 
May 2006 Test 
Particulate Matter Data 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 10-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.412 0.440 0.440 0.431 

Barometric Pressure !.n

.:.Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 81.991 84.128 81.699 82.606 

Avg. DGM Temp. 1 85.9 72.5 77.1 78.5 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.57 1.73 1.56 1.62 

Avg Delta H [ IELBS 0.1158 0.1274 0.1146 "6.1193 

DGM Calibration Factor 1.0270 1.0270 1.0270 1.0270 

Gas Sample Volume i dscf I 79.526 83.462 80.402 81.130 

Total Water Collected mL 1344.7 1438.7 1343.8 1375.7 

Volume of Water Vapor scf ' 63.403 67.835 63.360 64.866 

Moisture (measured) % v/v I 44.4 44.8 44.1 44.4 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 102.8 103.0 103.0 102.9 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M - 0.5564 0.5516 0.5593 0.5558 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

0 2 at Stack %dry 12.50 9.40 10.00 10.63 

CO + N2 %dry 81.10 83.80 83.00 82.63 

Dry Molecular Weight lb/lb-mole 29.52 29.46 29.52 29.50 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.41 24.32 24.44 24.39 

Excess Air at Stack 0/ 

/o 

140.3 73.9 83.9 99.4 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 i 194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.17 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.12 29.04 29.06 29.07 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 376.4 366.2 364.3 369.0 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P -- 0.4125 0.4145 0.3946 0.4072 

SDE Average ~ 11.931 11.915 11.330 11.725 

Pitot Coefficient - 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,928 1,932 1,832 1,897 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,998 16,027 15,198 15,741 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,827 9,940 9,453 9,740 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,468 5,483 5,287 5,413 

Isokinetics % 109 100 100 103 

Meter Box No. — 80610 80610 80610 -

Delta H @ in H2 0 1.803 1.803 1.803 -

Field QA Yqc - 1.0465 1.0591 , 1.0375 1.0477 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 1.90% 3.13% 1.02% 2.02% 

S,\_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performance TestVTest OataKtnyx May 2006V[M5 PM #3 May 2006 day 2.xls]OATA 
Method 5 Sampling Parameter s 

PT 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.15 0.3873 70 70 1.38 346 0.18 0.4243 76 75 1.90 370 0.13 0.3606 70 69 1.30 350 

a2 0.20 0.4472 77 72 1.81 378 0.20 0.4472 75 74 1.99 370 0.16 0.4000 74 69 1.58 364 

a3 0.20 0.4472 82 74 1.81 378 0.21 0.4583 76 73 2.09 368 0.17 0.4123 77 70 1.68 369 

a4 0.21 0.4583 85 75 1.89 388 0.20 0.4472 77 72 1.99 366 0.19 0.4359 80 71 1.88 369 

a5 0.20 0.4472 86 80 1.82 390 0.19 0.4359 75 71 1.90 363 0.17 0.4123 81 72 1.70 368 

a6 0.18 0.4243 90 82 1.66 374 0.19 0.4359 71 69 1.90 364 0.16 0.4000 82 73 1.60 362 

a7 0.15 0.3873 92 82 1.38 375 0.15 0.3873 76 69 1.50 362 0.16 0.4000 83 74 1.60 364 

a8 0.11 0.3317 93 83 1.02 374 0.11 0.3317 76 69 1.10 363 0.14 0.3742 83 75 1.40 365 

b1 0.16 0.4000 86 84 1.48 374 0.12 0.3464 69 68 1.20 365 0.15 0.3873 75 74 1.50 363 

b2 0.18 0.4243 93 85 1.67 377 0.16 0.4000 74 68 1.60 365 0.17 0.4123 80 75 1.70 366 

b3 0.18 0.4243 94 86 1.67 378 0.18 0.4243 75 68 1.80 365 0.17 0.4123 83 75 1.70 366 

b4 0.16 0.4000 96 88 1.48 379 0.18 0.4243 76 69 1.80 366 0.17 0.4123 84 76 1.70 365 

b5 0.18 0.4243 96 88 1.66 379 0.18 0.4243 75 68 1.80 364 0.16 0.4000 84 76 1.60 365 

b6 0.19 0.4359 96 88 1.75 378 0.20 0.4472 76 68 1.98 372 0.15 0.3873 85 77 1.50 368 

b7 0.15 0.3873 97 90 1.39 378 0.18 0.4243 77 68 1.78 372 0.13 0.3606 82 77 1.30 364 

b8 0.14 0.3742 98 91 1.32 377 0.14 0.3742 78 68 1.40 364 0.12 0.3464 84 77 1.20 361 

AVG 0.17 0.4125 85.9 1.57 376 0.17 0.4145 72.5 1.73 366 0.16 0.3946 77.1 1.56 364 
ENS . 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

MtC O E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

M5/ Particulate 

ONYX Environmental 

Q5 -iO-Ok. 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - inches: 

Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

J J 

39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

loc i 

mi 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pltot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@ : 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

impinger Outlet ID: 

31.1 6 

AS-S- H 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS: 

) T in. CF M 

in. 

in. 

CFM 

CFM 003 

0.84 

Htva 

'•021 FINAL PITOT y 

3921 

ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

IMPINGER VOL'S 

JN)T,.,,*INAl 

100 

100 

i n . 

ALL 

_LQ_ 

;„siycA ; s|L , 

Final Vol. 

164-1 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

•fitFOR MOISTURE CALC : 

NET GAIN: B^H" ! ml. 

SAMPLE CLOCK 

TIME' 

'.VELOCITY : 

HEAD 

.(MS)P,m.«f 

QRIFICE 

METERVO L 

MtaH.in.wc. 

OAS METER 

••:.- VOLUME •• 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, T PUMP 

VACUUM 

In . Ho . .. 

• •-. COMMENTS ••-

SAMPLE CLOCK 

TIME' 

'.VELOCITY : 

HEAD 

.(MS)P,m.«f 

QRIFICE 

METERVO L 

MtaH.in.wc. 

OAS METER 

••:.- VOLUME •• STACK 

• .**»... . 

fiLteftsox 

»»•» .. 

. IMWNGES 

,jJ:...<M:s:i 

XAD Trap 

.•:&'.<*& > 

GAS * *ETETf : 

PUMP 

VACUUM 

In . Ho . .. 

• •-. COMMENTS ••-

SAMPLE CLOCK 

TIME' 

'.VELOCITY : 

HEAD 

.(MS)P,m.«f 

QRIFICE 

METERVO L 

MtaH.in.wc. 

OAS METER 

••:.- VOLUME •• STACK 

• .**»... . 

fiLteftsox 

»»•» .. 

. IMWNGES 

,jJ:...<M:s:i 

XAD Trap 

.•:&'.<*& > \;:

-Ci. IN;^li;J 

PUMP 

VACUUM 

In . Ho . .. 

• •-. COMMENTS ••-

M 0 Sos.sol 3 U r H ^ £1 7 0 •K 

7 5 •Aft 37k 1<T4> 5 3 7 Si 77 7.5 4 

2> K . i n Hit. i 17fi 5^ 9a 74 W 

M • A | MP 1.5 3 S ? * 5 I 5{ 3 1 0 K H 

5 •ao 3 % 1 6 8 9o f 

•(£ \.u0 * S 3 S t 2 6 8 CjO 93 

7 S 7S S2 1 7 1 8a 

2 • H l.o3 a s o ST a 1ft S 3 

& 1 toO MWfl I 3 T 3 i q 52 2 54 1 ( U J ''«••• cAc v/ y ^ M.5 S51-Q 311 a S3 as/ ) K9 2 l(? 93 

I

6

) -IS 151. a -?70 2 T « 5 | «W fit f 

H 93-5 • lfc> 3 7 9 a 51 S 3 }<<0 I t SI 8 

5 • i e u b 4G>7.fe r n 151 7, SO SH aft9 % 

L n s 1.15 3 7 r a S i S'f3 0<iD <6 9$ H 

7 I.JT .151 a m <?1 L. 

<2 3 7 7 X*>\ 

mmm& 
ENSk!AECO M E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

M5 

Onyx 

5/10/2006 

TEST LOCATION: Unit #3 

RUN NUMBER: R2 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 39 

OPERATOR: J. Gorman 

*TART TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

500 

SAMPLE; 

•POINT 

.CLOCK, 

..'TIME 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

_ ProbeiEBot Number: 

PHot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H @: 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Tbamtocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

* 5 -*;J L 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

LEAK CHECKS: 

14 in. CFM 

In. 

1£ in. 

0.003 

CFM 

C FM 

0.84 

80610 

1.027 

1.803 

0.440 

nvrc- 3 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

FILTER DATA 

17 

Lt-2 3 

ORIFICE'. 

METER VOL. 

OtttaH. in'wc 

IGASMETER 

..V'VptUME' 

' ' ' ; •' ' 

NUHBERy 

STACK. PROBE, FILTER BOX 

•,.:•;-

TEMPERATURE READINGS, 

IMPIN3ER GAS METER 

PUMP • 

VACUUM , 

. IMPINGER VOL'S. 

FINAL; 

100 

100 A _ % L 

SILICA GEL ,., 

35I . Q 

Final Vol. 

L/olumes 

ORSAT DATA 

co? Oz,, 

FOR MOISTURE CALC : 

NET GAIN: j'CM M ml. 

COMMENTS 

•2(L 

1.7 

l i 

-30 

ilO . 

3 7Q 

_2M L 

2 M 

,.25J_ 

At 

.3>_5D_. 

3 W 

5< 

_3JS L 

3C 

2HQ 

75 

7fc 

15L 

11 

i i . 3 4 301 

43L 3M 

15 1 . 5 533. 3 1 3 35.3 76 

J l 1.3JbJ 21 

f t 

2% 3 9 0 76 

2 5 1 s a ISL 

lb -5-^.5 

f\ i y rt I 

3ao a n 7¥ 

SSL 

i i . 

I S L 3 5 0 

?6k 3C0 3 U _3_2JL 

1£_ 

"SST 

"SSI 

- L l 

3 1 

3^r 

373. 

J67.fc> 

1 U _ 

. 2 4 

~3S T 

a l t-

_£1 

* 5 i 

Jfk. SO 

7S 4 £ 

_2_£0_ S3 

L7LL 

_2L4L 73 ZbK 
ENS K /A£CO M E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

SAMPLING TRAIN: M5/ Particulate 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental 

DATE: os-u^ot , 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

39" 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@ : 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

3 ^ .OS INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

^LEAK CHECKS: 

| S in. CFM O.G&K 

0.84 

HB-a. 

i o n 

MHO 

MS TC- 3 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

In. CFM 

(p in. CFM , ! 

7 / FILTER DATA 

l7 1 / NUMBER: 

f, 383 * 

IMPINGER VOL'S. • 

100 

100 

220 

HI 

Final Vol. 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC. 

NET GAIN: 13^3$ ml. 

..-pAMPLEi 

;

;TIM E ; 

VELOCITY. 

:

 ''HEAD ' 

ORIFICE 

METERVOL. 

G AS METER 

VOLUME 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. °F .PUM P .'• 

VACUUM . . COMMENTS . 

..-pAMPLEi 

;

;TIM E ; 

VELOCITY. 

:

 ''HEAD ' 

ORIFICE 

METERVOL. 

G AS METER 

VOLUME STACK PROBE:

 : .FILTER BOX 

•.'.. vfH...... 

WPIN06R GAS» 

:,:^':JN :••}'";.!, 

.PUM P .'• 

VACUUM . . COMMENTS . 

0 •13 1.3 573.71 ^ 3 5 0 ISO 16 £9 ! 

7 5 1.55 S"77. <5 •3W 3 5 0 Ml 4 5 2T4> I* L<1 H 

3 IS '11 l.toS 523. 3 3 5 1 w

( 77 ID H 

*4 l-S S 587-1 A 53 5 0 80 7 1 H 

5 30 7 1.7 5<)33 3 5 3 M 7 5 H 3 d SI 73 H 

6> 3T5 k U m-i 25 7H1 <»2 371 7 3 i 

7 U U 3 8 3 SO 2HB 5 5 376 74 1 

8 » . s 1.4 2 5 1 mi S~W 3 Si 75 : 1 

B i 4 0 •IS 1 5 U3.81 0 253 3if i 34k 7 5 74 ' H f<rs4>i P 133^ 

(,1b J l L l 3i 53 3 4 9 48 3t7 SO 75

 1 A 

75 • n 17 U4. I * 5 | 3-50 M7 S3 75 H 

17 1-7 U3T.5 3 5 ( 3Hft ^ 3«0 $ 4 7fe 

s iO u 3.5/ 53 171 SH 7fe 1 

«P-S • 1 5 £>W.3 3 5 1 a w 7 5'S S5 71 i 

7 IP5 .ll> l . b k Y 5 / 3 ft) t T 35<e 83 7 7 7 

1135 i.a 3 t l a So A M 7 1 < «> 

(.5 mi x 
Metals Data 
Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s 

Fixe d Hearth Incinerator #3 

Metho d 0060 (Metals) Samplin g Parameter s 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 10-May-06 10-May-06 11-May-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 10:08 15:00 11:25 

Stop Time 12:51 17:16 13:39 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.408 0.431 0.431 0.423 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.10 29.02 29.05 29.06 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 81.248 83.546 76.761 80.518 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 86.8 71.2 78.0 78.7 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.57 1.76 1.42 1.58 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1156 0.1292 0.1041 0.1163 

DGM Calibration Factor - 1.0390 1.0390 1.0390 1.0390 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 79.598 84.056 76.269 79.974 

Total Water Collected mL 1271.1 1380.4 1300.2 1317.2 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 59.932 65.086 61.304 62.108 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 43.0 43.6 44.6 43.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 102.8 103.0 103.0 102.9 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M - 0.5705 0.5636 0.5544 0.5628 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 6.40 6.80 7.00 6.73 

0 2 at Stack %dry 12.40 9.40 10.00 10.60 

CO + N 2 %dry 81.20 83.80 83.00 82.67 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.52 29.46 29.52 29.50 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.57 24.46 24.39 24.47 

Excess Air at Stack /o 137.2 73.9 83.9 98.3 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 0.22 0.21 0.07 0.17 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.12 29.04 29.06 29.07 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 381.2 371.1 371.4 374.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P - 0.4128 0.4235 0.3843 0.4069 

SDE Average — 11.972 12.209 11.082 11.754 

Pitot Coefficient - 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,929 1,974 1,794 1,899 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 16,001 16,377 14,883 15,753 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,774 10,097 9,178 9,683 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,576 5,691 5,088 5,451 

Isokinetics % 109 101 102 104 

Meter Box No. — 80184 80184 80184 --

Delta H @ in HzO 1.8810 1.8810 1.8810 -

Field QA Yqc — 1.0340 1.0500 1.0313 1.038 

[Deviation! Pre-Y % 0.48% 1.06% 0.74% 0.8% 
Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

PT 

Run l AVGS - METAL S Run 2 AVG S -METAL S R u n 3 AVG S - MET A L S 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H | STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.15 0.3873 73 72 1.38 366 0.12 0.3464 79 77 1.20 359 0.16 0.4000 71 71 1.50 367 

2 0.20 0.4472 78 74 1.80 379 0.21 0.4583 76 75 2.00 375 0.17 0.4123 75 71 1.60 372 

3 0.20 0.4472 81 75 1.80 381 0.20 0.4472 74 74 1.90 376 0.18 0.4243 77 72 1.70 373 

4 0.21 0.4583 84 77 1.92 385 0.21 0.4583 72 73 2.00 376 0.17 0.4123 79 72 1.60 373 

5 0.21 0.4583 88 83 1.92 382 0.21 0.4583 72 71 2.00 373 0.16 0.4000 80 74 1.50 374 

6 0.18 0.4243 89 84 1.65 383 0.20 0.4472 70 68 1.90 371 0.15 0.3873 81 75 1.45 373 

7 0.15 0.3873 90 85 1.40 382 0.17 0.4123 71 68 1.60 368 0.12 0.3464 81 76 1.15 372 

8 0.11 0.3317 91 85 1.00 381 0.12 0.3464 72 68 1.20 367 0.10 0.3162 81 76 0.95 357 

b1 0.14 0.3742 88 86 1.30 367 0.15 0.3873 69 68 1.45 358 0.12 0.3464 78 77 1.15 369 

2 0.17 0.4123 93 87 1.56 385 0.17 0.4123 72 68 1.60 371 0.16 0.4000 81 77 1.55 366 

3 0.20 0.4472 94 88 1.80 386 0.20 0.4472 73 69 1.90 375 0.18 0.4243 83 78 1.70 374 

4 0.18 0.4243 95 89 1.65 386 0.17 0.4123 72 68 1.60 376 0.17 0.4123 83 78 1.60 375 

5 0.18 0.4243 95 90 1.65 386 0.20 0.4472 71 67 1.90 376 0.15 0.3873 83 79 1.45 375 

6 0.20 0.4472 96 91 1.80 385 0.20 0.4472 72 68 1.90 376 0.15 0.3873 83 79 1.45 375 

7 0.15 0.3873 96 91 1.40 383 0.19 0.4359 73 68 1.80 376 0.12 0.3464 82 79 1.15 374 

8 0.12 0.3464 97 92 1.12 382 0.17 0.4123 73 68 1.60 364 0.12 0.3464 84 80 1.15 374 

AVG 0.17 0.4128 L86.8 1.57 381 0.18 0.4235 71.2 1.76 371 0.15 0.3843 78.0 1.42 371 
ENS R 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HALF 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Element Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Mg 

Sample Fid Blk 

MS 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Hg 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Hg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 9.26 0.76 * 13.78 0.46 8.50 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 8.50 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.10 (0.10) 13.78 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.10 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.68 0.34 * 13.78 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.34 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 17.70 1.01 * 13.78 0.89 16.69 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 16.69 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0,00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 23.90 2.70 * 13.78 1.20 21.20 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 21.20 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 LOO - 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -- 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13 .78 ug use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 ug then use the greater of 13.78 ug or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY : 

(a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <= I ug then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 (ig use the greater of either 1 ng or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

t'g 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF (0.03) (0.03) 6.00 (0.00) (0.03) 

BACK HALF 97.33 0.04 * 6.00 4.87 97.29 

II TOTAL Hg 97.29 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

RUN NO. Run 1 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 (ig use the greater of either 6 ug or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
ENS R 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HAL F 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Elemen Mg t 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Front Half 

ug 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

Corrected 

Back Half 

ug 

TOTAL 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Mg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 „ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 249.00 0.76 * 13.78 12.45 248.24 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 248.24 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.10 (0.10) 13.78 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.10 

Cadmium (Cd) 1.38 0.34 * 13.78 0.07 1.04 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 1.04 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 29.00 1.01 * 13.78 1.45 27.99 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 27.99 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 22.30 2.70 * 13.78 1.12 19.60 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 19.60 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 „ 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 ng use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 u.gthen use the greater of 13.78 ng or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction (a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

MERCURY : 

If 

If 

( 

BHB is >0 but < 

BHB is >1 ug u 

) Not Detecte 

se 

il 

1 fig then use 

Ihe greater o 

Reportable 1 

the BHB valu 

' either 1 ng o 

detection Limi 

e 

-5 

t 

o correct 

% of BH 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

ug CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

FRONT HALF 0.10 (0.03) 6.00 0.01 0.10 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

BACK HALF 121.23 0.04 * 6.00 6.06 121.19 RUN NO. Run 2 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

| TOTAL Hg 121.29 

CLIENT : Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

If FB is >0 but <=6 ng then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 ng or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
ENS R 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HALF 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value (a) 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Front Half 

ug 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

ug 

5% of 

Sample 

ug 

Corrected 

Back Half 

ug 

Corrected 

F H + BH 

Mg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 .. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 _. 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 946.00 0.76 * 13.78 47.30 945.24 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 945.24 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.10 (0.10) 13.78 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.10 

Cadmium (Cd) 2.76 0.34 * 13.78 0.14 2.42 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 2.42 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -- 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 55.80 1.01 * 13.78 2.79 54.79 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 54.79 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 40.60 2.70 * 13.78 2.03 37.90 0.00 0.00 i.00 - 0.00 37.90 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 pg use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 pg then use the greater of 13.78 ug or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY : 

(a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

if BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 pg use the greater of either 1 pg or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

ug 

Fid Blk 

ug 

Default 

Value 

Mg 

5% of 

Sample 

Mg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Mg 

FRONT HALF 0.27 (0.03) 6.00 0.01 0.27 

BACK HALF 89.12 0.04 * 6.00 4.46 89.08 

II TOTAL Hg 89.35 

CLIENT: 

PROGRAM : 

RUN NO. 

Onyx Environmental Service, Inc. 

Fixed Hearth Kiln #3 

Run 3 

If FB is >0 but <=6 pg then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 pg use the greater of either 6 pg or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limil 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
E N S 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

HCCO EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

LEAK CHECKS: 

M29/Metals 

ONYX Environmental 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter • Inches: 

Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

/ 

39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

1008 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@ : 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

'Xt/o 

*HC-<><-P 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

In. 

In. 

In. 

CO. 

0.84 

l:ol<? 

Q> 4o8 

4/A 

INIT. PITOT 

" FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

+-

CFM 

CFM 

CFM • QQ*f 

FILTER DATA 

IMPINGER VOLS, 

100 

100 

100 

100 

3 89 

111 

<5 

100 

SJUICAgEI. 

Final Vol. 

Volumes 

1211 

ORSAT DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC : 

NET GAIN: Cf ml. 

SAMPLE: 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY : 

HEAP 

ORIFICE 

METER VOL 

.J^HJows.. 

. OAS METER 

VOLUME 

-...If 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, T . PUMP 

VACUUM 

;iMii!ifi!fliJt!ffiiii«t^ 

COMMENTS 

SAMPLE: 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY : 

HEAP 

ORIFICE 

METER VOL 

.J^HJows.. 

. OAS METER 

VOLUME 

-...If 

STACK PROBE 

.... «!M J V *•»».'.-* 

'XA O Trap 

:,,iK»S'V,;..i: 

G A S METER ! 

. PUMP 

VACUUM 

;iMii!ifi!fliJt!ffiiii«t^ 

COMMENTS 

SAMPLE: 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY : 

HEAP 

ORIFICE 

METER VOL 

.J^HJows.. 

. OAS METER 

VOLUME 

-...If 

STACK PROBE 

.... «!M J V *•»».'.-* 

'XA O Trap 

:,,iK»S'V,;..i: . . ..- IN .vi ... . OUT. , 1. 

. PUMP 

VACUUM 

;iMii!ifi!fliJt!ffiiii«t^ 

COMMENTS 

0 1.C It/ 2 5 7 * 7 3 7 ^

 1 To 

X 7<r is t-bo 278. XT , •2JL9 "LS7 -75 7 f i 

3. it 'e.io t 80 3&.7 ~ ^f- -7JT fa-O 

o.J-f i<ro &t r? h.0 *Ut ( ¥6 68 si &<o 

¥ D.<& i/£>0.1 S~ 3 2 3 ~UL( ai Bf 

7 331. ic 5TZ> 

3 C>H hoo Hio- IO /* •s.sr 

S70/0 '/VS Pan*-aJ***4fas~ 

I i rJJV i$o 2by 1S1 1 ^ //>- Ba #c £&5TAijr- //SV 

* -0-/ 7 2-S5 -

ISO 6 7 

3 ir 8* / s o i f ? do * i t>3 

H /•6<r IMl n 81 

5 HO 9Z* *o.t& /•6 C VJY.7 - <?o 

w vnsr'Qi - O. W / 0 0 2S& 4f . T o 

1 3 S 3 

UfC — 

2 St) 5 f % M 

ills'ik ISO 0

 1 

/• t/.o 

-

\ 

msmm 
ENS K 

SAMPLING TRAIN: 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

M29 

E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Onyx 

5/10/2006 

TEST LOCATION: Unit #3 

RUN NUMBER: R2 

Stack Diameter - inches: 39 

OPERATOR: B. Hardy 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: 

/SOD 

SAMPLE 

POINT CLOCK vELOcrrr.. 

HEAD!./ 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSURE (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@ : 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

L 2 ! 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

LEAKCHECK6: 

14 in. 

in. 

In. 

0.84 4-

60164 

1.039 

1.881 

0.431 

UK 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT Initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

// 

0.004 

FILTER DATA 

ORIFICE 

METER'VpL.j 

Dp»inH, »ttsl}.i!ivw: m ' 

/'tSASMETER'. 

VOLUME , 

"" ' It' ^ 

TEMPERATURE 

PROBE, FILTER BOX 

READINGS, 

IMPINQER f ilW Outlet OAS METER 

: . IN . v 

l PUMP 

:

 VACUUM", 

„IMPINOERVQL:S,-

IN'I .. FINAL 

100 

ML 

JJ2_ 

IO 

jot>_ 

iDO 

SILICA GEL 

JiM . 

Final Vol. 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

Xllel freR-MOiSTURE CALC : 

I5.M [NET GAIN : O f 6 4 

ml. 

. COMMENTS : 

0,x ( 

TIP 

. M L M r . 

fr 

i c y <7k • 7 3 

e-ij i_.o 

I f 

3 t 7o 

6.(7 2 ^ 0 JL7_ 7_L 

0 J X F 2 - 7 i Vw 

Lif2_ 

4 6 U -

1^ 

g i b 

s 7 60 4?, -44 i t 

I9o _1 t 

-£2 5 1 W (a 

_L&_ _T7 U 

1£± is*® 

ME. 

322; 
ENS K MCC O E P A ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G - FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

LEAK CHECKS: 

SAMPLING TRAIN: M29/Metals 

PLANT: ONYX Environmental 

DATE: 

TEST LOCATION: 

RUN NUMBER: 

Stack Diameter - Inches: 

Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

3 

39" 

OPERATOR: 

START TIME: 

STOP TIME: ~fjf9 

SAMPLE 

• •*ow-\ 

A l 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

o. 

BAROMETRIC PRESSURE: 

STATIC PRESSUR E (+/-): 

Probe/Pitot Number: 

Pitot Coefficient: 

Filter Box No.: 

Meter Box Number: 

Orifice Coefficient (Y): 

Delta H@ : 

Nozzle Size: 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Impinger Outlet ID: 

V- ,07 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC . 

0.84 

som 

Mi 

MSI 

t*>/A 

INIT. PITOT 

FINAL PITOT 

ORSAT initial: 

ORSAT Final: 

ORIFICE 

METER VOL. 

•MB»H,)n,wij, 

GAS METER 

VOLUME 

JL 

\ l m. CF M , L\o2 

In. CFM 

7 In. CFM , COH 

V / V / FILTE R DAT A 

IXsT 

TOT PILTeftSox 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F 

^ 7 

"STSTJETSR" 

J_?J _ 

puj_ 

JJL 

. PUMP 

VACUUM 

IMPINGER VOLS. 

100 

100 

100 

100 

ioi t 

U9, 

ioi. 

l o o 

SILICA GEL. 

Final Vol. 

Rinse 

Volumes 

ORSAT DATA 

FOR MOISTURE CALC : 

NET GAIN: ("\6D.j , ml. 

COMMENTS 

373 - 1Af I 

3 f f t& x>t> 7 7 .22= 

1 fr 

72. 

5 Be 3i?f 0 % Bo ^3= 

3 7 

/ r 1 5 _ 

2k± 

372- Zh> 2 -

AL 

7 c 

6 i .74. 

577 , 

i-/<r S77 . f <?<f 

S3 

_7JL 

t7C 7.C - 1 1 

It 3A 

Lh 2£L 

5 

T 

Ho • 3 7 r 25TD TJ: 

O • IT " ^7S f 2 - r 4o_ JL1 . 

<55 /«M 
ENS R 

PLANT: 

DATE: 

LOCATION ; 

AECO M 

ORSAT ANALYSIS (EPA METHOD 3) 

ONYX Environmental Services 

Unit #3 Fixed Hearth 

SAMPLE TYPE: 

OPERATOR: 

Integrated Bag 

PRE-LEAK CHECK: 

POST-LEAK CHECK 

NOTE: Check : Liquid level must not faS 

Shea^, UAf&'V below bottom of capifiary tubing in 4 minutes 

and meniscus must not change by more than 

0.2 mL in 4 minutes. 

CO, 

DATA CRITERIA -

When greater than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

When less than 4%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When greater than or equal to 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.2% or less. 

When less than 15%, difference between readings shall be 0.3% or less. 

Net 0 2 is actual 0 2 minus actual CO 2 reading. 
June 2006 Test 
Particulate Matter Data 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.431 0.431 0.431 0.431 

Barometric Pressure !.n-Hfl 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Net Sampling Time mm. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 110.6 111.2 109.0 110.3 

Avg Delta H in H 2 0 1.31 1.43 1.41 1.38 

Avg Delta H !

n

,.H.g. 0.0964 0.1049 0.1034 0.1016 

DGM Calibration Factor 1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Total Water Collected mL 1341.0 1487.9 1340.1 1389.7 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 63.228 70.154 63.186 65.523 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.3 101.3 1 101.5 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M -- 0.5333 0.5216 0.5446 0.5332 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

O z at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

CO + N2 %dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 83.27 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.18 24.02 24.30 24.17 

Excess Air at Stack % 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H 2 0 -0.15 -0.15 -0.13 -0.14 

Stack Pressure !.n

..-..Ea 29.54 29.54 29.49 29.52 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386.2 387.9 385.9 386.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P -- 0.3701 0.3922 0.3930 0.3851 

SDE Average -

10.765 11.420 11.429 11.205 

Pitot Coefficient ~ 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,736 1,847 1,840 1,808 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,399 15,326 15,262 14,996 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,870 9,422 9,390 9,228 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Meter Box No. — 80754 80754 80754 — 

Delta H @ in H 2 0 1.832 1.832 1.832 -

Field QA Yqc ~ i.0066 0.9918 0.9974 0.9986 

[Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.04% 1.51% 0.95% 0.84% 

S:VJOB\2006\Onyx\Performance TesftTest DataVJune 2006\2nd Retesft[PM.xlsJDATA 
Method 5 Sampling Parameters 

PT 

Run l Run 2 Run 3 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delia P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delia H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.07 0.2646 104 102 0.66 382 0.10 0.3162 102 99 0.92 382 0.17 0.4123 89 87 1.53 379 

a2 0.12 0.3464 104 102 1.13 387 0.10 0.3162 106 102 0.92 383 0.15 0.3873 92 89 1.35 380 

a3 0.19 0.4359 109 104 1.79 386 0.16 0.4000 108 103 1.47 386 0.14 0.3742 95 90 1.26 379 

a4 0.19 0.4359 111 104 1.79 387 0.18 0.4243 111 104 1.66 389 0.14 0.3742 108 106 1.26 384 

a5 0.15 0.3873 114 106 1.41 388 0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.29 387 0.18 0.4243 112 106 1.62 388 

a6 0.16 0.4000 115 107 1.50 388 0.15 0.3873 112 106 1.38 385 0.18 0.4243 114 107 1.62 388 

a7 0.12 0.3464 115 106 1.13 383 0.18 0.4243 115 107 1.66 385 0.12 0.3464 116 108 1.08 387 

a8 0.15 0.3873 116 104 1.41 382 0.15 0.3873 116 109 1.38 388 0.10 0.3162 117 109 0.90 381 

b1 0.07 0.2646 113 111 0.66 382 0.18 0.4243 110 110 1.66 386 0.22 0.4690 112 111 1.98 384 

b2 0.14 0.3742 113 111 1.32 383 0.18 0.4243 114 111 1.66 388 0.17 0.4123 112 111 1.53 388 

D3 0.11 0.3317 115 111 1.03 389 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.66 390 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.62 389 

b4 0.13 0.3606 116 111 1.22 391 0.16 0.4000 118 112 1.47 391 0.19 0.4359 118 113 1.71 390 

b5 0.14 0.3742 116 112 1.32 390 6.18 0.4243 119 113 1.66 392 0.18 0.4243 120 114 1.62 390 

b6 0.15 0.3873 116 112 1.41 387 0.16 0.4000 121 114 1.47 395 0.16 0.4000 120 115 1.44 392 

b7 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 388 0.14 0.3742 121 114 1.29 392 0.12 0.3464 120 115 1.08 391 

b8 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 386 0.14 0.3742 122 115 1.29 387 0.10 0.3162 120 115 0.90 384 

AVG 0.14 0.3701 110.6 1.31 386 0.16 0.3922 111.2 1.43 388 0.16 0.3930 109.0 1.41 386 
ENS R 

Sampling Train 

Run Number 

Clicul 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date , 

Operator 

Slack Dia. - In. 

Start Time 

Slop Time 

E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

M. 

UK) .1 3 - Snucc-V- , ILL 

3i3 / 

Barometric Pressure 

Stalk Pressure (+/-) 

Probe/Pitot Number 

Pilot Coefficient 

Filter Box No. 

Meter Bon No. 

Orifice Coefficient (V) 

Delta H (it; 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

.IMS . 

- • n 

n S - H-ft MID VAC 

LEAK CHECKS In "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. )(, 

H E 

FINAL VAC. 5" 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

PISH INIT. PITOT 

•OO I 

FINAL. PITOT 

I-OPT FILTER DAT A 

•XNOMBEHX TARE 

IMPINUKB VOL'S. 

I S " 

•MNA'IX 

" H O 

i.22. 

: SIUCASEL: 

RINSE 

I2£_ 

Orsat 

C02: : ro 

7.5 

7-T /UO 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

:

 SAMPUS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY 

W A P 

Delia)?, In wc p«|taH.in«c 

CAS METER 

VOLUME 

re 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. °F 

VACUUM COMMSOTS 

:

 SAMPUS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY 

W A P 

Delia)?, In wc p«|taH.in«c 

CAS METER 

VOLUME 

re STACK PH0BE 

OJUSANfC 

MdlBllLif jMPib*)i{« 

VACUUM COMMSOTS 

:

 SAMPUS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

VELOCITY 

W A P 

Delia)?, In wc p«|taH.in«c 

CAS METER 

VOLUME 

re STACK PH0BE 

OJUSANfC 

MdlBllLif jMPib*)i{« 

VACUUM COMMSOTS 

<K\ 0 0-7 — ' fc>7 102 1 

2 i f \.\\ JCI — |Pl

f 167 I 

3 IS \ n : m — <M /OT /©<•/ 3 

ibol . % 387 — Ml lO'l J 

J 15 . /oc//. t> — L l [O(o 3 

G> IIS Id 1 50 IDI2 .9 A $ »5? — )0l 3 

1 10 .0 23a — ic4 3 

8 S2.S i.Hi \r>i2.Q — J sW/ W & It 12 

r*s^r- ^ /6 a 9 

t 4 0 , m • (?(/> 1021. 1 2M3 ^ M > 6( • 13 Wl 

a 61.5 . i ^ 1,32 /0 3I.5 — 50 3 

II 1.03 £0 il l Si 

S3.5 •ss /0M0 9 i 9 J a Ml AW ((I a. 

5 90 • K 1-3.7 SO %. o 2 to 5 3 112 a. 

& <?l-5 IT 1 H, 321 2»/0 — Ux D 

(05 n lt.0 105 C 1 a i i — 49 1(7 If? 

• n iDfbo • 9 n / i n 1/2 a 

i£>0> A OO r 
E NS R I A EC O ivi EPA ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIELD DAT A SHEE T 

: :. iMBiNEEfc VOL'S-:•:•: Oriat 

Sampling Train M 2 9 / f\E> Barometric Pressure j4,S 0 LEAK CHECKS In "Hg :-:imiT::-:-:v :-HNAI:-:-:-:-.' RINSE :co2 : 02 : 

Hun Number Static Pressure (+/- — Os r 9- INITIAL VAC. | C In. CFM 0 C 

Client Probe/Pitot Number rt5 . " -B MID VAC. In. CFM \co a 

Facility Location Semrtf . I L Pitot Coefficient • 9^ FINAL VAC. 7 la. CFM •. 

/ 

•oo l icO 

Source 1-3 Filter Box No. H8- » + y - . 

la. CFM •. 

/ + - 0 loo 

Date Of. Meter Box No. INIT. PITOT *^ FINAL PITOT SOr 

Operato I t r Orifice Coefficient (V) f on~\ FILTER DAT A I t 

Stack Dia. - In. it" Delta II (Zi l - « -:-.NOMBEB': XVTARE:-:-: 

Start Time Nozzle Size/No. •M3 r 

Stop Time XAD Thermocouple ID: "~ :::: : siucA«EL .::: : Final Purge Rate 

Imp Outlet TC ID: Final PH 

SAMPLE CLOCK VEUK'ITV ORIFICE CASMfcl'Eft TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F C£A ^ 

POINT imh HEAD MfiTEHVOL VOLUME OHOkHtC #iii;£^Kit*fcfeRi:li:ti: VACUUM COMMENTS 

Delta!?, (awe Pe|<»H.lo*f fe STACK PSOBE Ov?N MO0i)Ljj: iMPiNtJSit <n(Jg 

Al 0 }n T * I 77A 2 3 C — lol 1 Ll^l.l 1 1 •? ' 

2 l . < • 1 0 fnll. O 3S2> 2 3 « 'Vio - £ 1 10b IbZ 

IC - I G M 7 I0T5 . 2 , (0% ( o 3 

9 22. < •ift 1-44 (0%0. 3 2 9 0 — 5 1 (11 l e y */ 

5 .10 •19 i.aq to « 5 . tf 3 S 7 — f 9 111 (OS 

C 7 7 < 1 5 U S J85 > 2 3 8 • — 5 2 l/a / 0 6 

7 HC (6<&. ( $ 3 5 2<r< } 9 9 5 3 »/r I 0 7 

8 v.< 15 1.3$ NO UoV. 8 3 S S no 9 * | o 9 f 

Bl LO •16 2M{ P I ? — * 9 no 110 rescue/ € J(3i . 

X 34±*4»~f f 1113.4 3SS 3 9 A H i 9 — 9 S i K KI 

3 1< .&<b u n . 8 P"f 1 4<J lifts* na t 

9 • 9 ~ 1123. 1 iWS — 5 L »H i n 5 

S aMI — " 91 H9 113 9 

q7.5 M l 113 9 . 3 3TS 3 9 9 p i MV i 

7 toT l,3<?.s V\2 trW0 — 1*1 119 H 

U 9 } $ 7 3 9 i - f a \ix u r V 

j 

-] - • 

1 
ENS R I AECO M EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sunipling Train 

Hun Number 

Clicul 

FacUity Location 

Source 

Date 

Operator 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) 

Probe/Pitot Number 

Pitot Coefftcleut _ 

Filter Bo* No. _ 

Meter Box No. 

LEAK CHECKS in "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. IL 

A S - M' MID VAC._ 

I E FINAL VAC. 

- M i INIT. PITOT 

In. CFM 

In. CFM 

. CFM 

FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

Stack Ula.-lu. Delta H @ 1,93 1 : :NDMBER : : :::-TARE-:-:-; 

Start Time Nozzle Size/No. 

. SfSl 

Stop Time 134 4 XAD Tliermocouple ID: /Q.JSL 

iMPiKGEft VOL'S: :: 

:-IMT.:-: •mtm-y.-: 

34-g 

/3-S~ 

_ZE Z 

: SIUCAiGELv 

roiNT 

CLOCK: 

TIME 

V£UK'IIY 

MEAD 

CclruP, la w« 

ORIFICE 

Min Kd vol. 

HlMl IntYf 

<!A£ MEIER 

VOLUME 

ft? 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F

 : 

roiNT COMMENTS. 

CLOCK: 

TIME 

V£UK'IIY 

MEAD 

CclruP, la w« 

ORIFICE 

Min Kd vol. 

HlMl IntYf 

<!A£ MEIER 

VOLUME 

ft? STACK P^OBE M*>J)l)Lt IMPlNCtfl* 

roiNT VACUUM COMMENTS. 

CLOCK: 

TIME 

V£UK'IIY 

MEAD 

CclruP, la w« 

ORIFICE 

Min Kd vol. 

HlMl IntYf 

<!A£ MEIER 

VOLUME 

ft? STACK P^OBE M*>J)l)Lt IMPlNCtfl* 

VACUUM COMMENTS. 

M o n 149.909 340 — (SKI i?7 1 

a 7. ST • I C 1-35 \^ 1 340 79« q i & I 

K .(9 no. 2 37^ 240 ~r 9 ? s 

M i x c •19 L2L 3*4 -- 19 I 

S 3 0 (Fi 

—.. . Taff-,- , „ 

l l h .ft 3$g a 4 9 — {1 II? lo£> 1 

[> n . c •w 115-i i &S a 3 9 237 Ji4 /07 1 

7 • IX -OS m o - s 3 SI i% 2 HO — 5 7 116 10? / 

•10 40 331 2.44 — i n 1/? ) 

^ — 

& i CO I^. U 3<?9 ^ — M» Wl 

a 67.C •11 1 5 3 Mi ±0 11/ 

J3 7S' aoo. q ? 9 0 

. 

\t(, . / a a 

1 1.11 ,4 9 0 ;WT «• 113 1 

S •IP I . U ZHO a a 5.3 114 j 

4 <n-c <((, i.wa a 9 ( "?9^ 5" L 120 IK JJ 

7 I-Oft 2 3 ^ 9 391 5 3 

« H2.5 • q o D27. y 3S4 I C O 244 

. 

U S f 

IQC> J3(. C5 > 

1 

i 

RINSE 

i 3 a 

Ortat 

cor. : 02 

7.1 

1-1 

Final Purge Rate 
Metals Data 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 15:12 10:06 10:06 

Stop Time 17:29 12:29 12:44 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.431 0.431 0.431 0.431 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.55 29.50 29.53 

Net Sampling Time min. 120.0 120.0 120.0 120.0 

Volume Metered dcf 78.244 82.902 81.745 80.964 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 110.6 111.2 109.0 110.3 

Avg Delta H in H2 0 1.31 1.43 1.41 1.38 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.0964 0.1049 0.1034 0.1016 

DGM Calibration Factor 1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 1.0070 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 72.247 76.482 75.573 74.768 

Total Water Collected mL 1341.0 1487.9 1340.1 1389.7 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 63.228 70.154 63.186 65.523 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 46.7 47.8 45.5 46.7 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.3 101.3 101.5 101.3 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M — 0.5333 0.5216 0.5446 0.5332 

C 0 2 at Stack %dry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

0 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

CO + N 2 %dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 83.27 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.18 24.02 24.30 24.17 

Excess Air at Stack /o 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 -0.15 -0.15 -0.13 -0.14 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.54 29.54 29.49 29.52 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 386.2 387.9 385.9 386.6 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P — 0.3701 0.3922 0.3930 0.3851 

SDE Average — 10.765 11.420 11.429 11.205 

Pitot Coefficient — 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,736 1,847 1,840 1,808 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 14,399 15,326 15,262 14,996 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 8,870 9,422 9,390 9,228 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 4,730 4,915 5,114 4,920 

Isokinetics % 104 106 101 104 

Meter Box No. -- 80754 80754 80754 -

Delta H @ inHzO 1.8320 1.8320 1.8320 -

Field QA Yqc — 1.0066 0.9918 0.9974 0.999 

^Deviation] Pre-Y % 0.04% 1.51% 0.95% 0.8% 
Method 0060 (Metals) Sampling Parameters 

PT 

Run 1 AVGS--METALS Run 2 AVGS -- METALS Run 3 AVGS--METALS 

PT Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

Delta P SQRT 

Delta P 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

Delta H STACK 

TEMP 

a1 0.07 0.2646 104 102 0.66 382 0.10 0.3162 102 99 0.92 382 0.17 0.4123 89 87 1.53 379 

2 0.12 0.3464 104 102 1.13 387 0.10 0.3162 106 102 0.92 383 0.15 0.3873 92 89 1.35 380 

3 0.19 0.4359 109 104 1.79 386 0.16 0.4000 108 103 1.47 386 0.14 0.3742 95 90 1.26 379 

4 0.19 0.4359 111 104 1.79 387 0.18 0.4243 111 104 1.66 389 0.14 0.3742 108 106 1.26 384 

5 0.15 0.3873 114 106 1.41 388 0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.29 387 0.18 0.4243 112 106 1.62 388 

6 0.16 0.4000 115 107 1.50 388 0.15 0.3873 112 106 1.38 385 0.18 0.4243 114 107 1.62 388 

7 0.12 0.3464 115 106 1.13 383 0.18 0.4243 115 107 1.66 385 0.12 0.3464 116 108 1.08 387 

8 0.15 0.3873 116 104 1.41 382 0,15 0.3873 116 109 1.38 388 0.10 0.3162 117 109 0.90 381 

b1 0.07 0.2646 113 111 0.66 382 0.18 0.4243 110 110 1.66 386 0.22 0.4690 112 111 1.98 384 

2 0.14 0.3742 113 111 1.32 383 0.18 0.4243 114 111 1.66 388 0.17 0.4123 112 111 1.53 388 

3 0.11 0.3317 115 111 1.03 389 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.66 390 0.18 0.4243 116 112 1.62 389 

4 0.13 0.3606 116 111 1.22 391 0.16 0.4000 118 112 1.47 391 0.19 0.4359 118 113 1.71 390 

5 0.14 0.3742 116 112 1.32 390 0.18 0.4243 119 113 1.66 392 0.18 0.4243 120 114 1.62 390 

6 0.15 0.3873 116 112 1.41 387 0.16 0.4000 121 114 1.47 395 0.16 0.4000 120 115 1.44 392 

7 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 388 0.14 0.3742 121 114 1.29 392 0.12 0.3464 120 115 1.08 391 

8 0.17 0.4123 117 112 1.60 386 0.14 0.3742 122 115 1.29 387 0.10 0.3162 120 115 0.90 384 

AVG 0.14 0.3701 110.6 1.31 386 0.16 0.3922 111.2 1.43 388 0.16 0.3930 109.0 1.41 | 386 
ENS R AECOM 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HAL F 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Back Half 

HS 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Hg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 „ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 5.81 0.61 * 13.78 0.29 5.20 0.33 0.00 1.00 0.02 0.33 5.53 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 9.64 0.79 * 13.78 0.48 8.85 1.06 0.00 1.00 0.05 1.06 9.91 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 — 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 |ig use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 u.g then use the greater of 13.78 pg or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY : 

(a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to conect 

If BHB is >1 ng use the greater of either 1 (ig or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

H8 

Default 

* Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

BACK HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

II TOTAL Hg 0.00 

CLIENT : Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRA M : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

R U N NO. Run 1 

If FB is >0 but <=6 pg then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 ng use the greater of either 6 pg or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates yalue used for blank correction 
ENSR AECOi 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HAL F 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Hg 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

H6 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 _. 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 -- 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 4.30 0.61 * 13.78 0.22 3.69 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 3.69 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.C9 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13,78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 3.98 0.79 * 13.78 0.20 3.19 0.66 0.00 1.00 0.03 0.66 3.85 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Lead(Pb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 ' - 0.00 0.00 0.00 LOO -- 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 pg use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 pg then use the greater of 13.78 pg or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY : 

(a) - based on a 3.54 - in. Filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 pg use the greater of either 1 pg or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

BACK HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

1 TOTAL Hg 0.00 

CLIENT : Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 2 

If FB is >0 but <=6 pg then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 pg use the greater of either 6 pg or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
ENS R AECOI 

Multi-Metals Blank Correction 

FRONT HAL F BAC K HAL F 

TOTAL 

Element 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value (a) 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Front Half 

Hg 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

Hg 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Back Half 

Hg 

Corrected 

F H + B H 

Hg 

Silver (Ag) 0.00 0.00 13.78 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 _ 0.00 0.00 

Aluminum (Al) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Arsenic (As) 5.60 0.61 * 13.78 0.28 4.99 0.21 0.00 1.00 0.01 0.21 5.20 

Barium (Ba) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Beryllium (Be) 0.00 0.00 13.78 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Cadmium (Cd) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Cobalt (Co) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Chromium (Cr) 11.10 0.79 * 13.78 0.56 10.31 0.84 0.00 1.00 0.04 0.84 11.15 

Copper (Cu) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Manganese (Mn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Nickel (Ni) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 LOO - 0.00 0.00 

Lead (Pb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Antimony (Sb) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 LOO - 0.00 0.00 

Selenium (Se) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 LOO - 0.00 0.00 

Thallium (Tl) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

Vanadium (V) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

- Zinc (Zn) 0.00 0.00 13.78 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 - 0.00 0.00 

If FHB is between 0 to 13.78 pg use blank value to correct 

If FHB > 13.78 pg then use the greater of 13.78 pg or the lesser value between FHB or 5% of FHS . 

* - value used for blank correction 

MERCURY : 

(a) - based on a 3.54 - in. filter size 

If BHB is >0 but <=1 pg then use the BHB value to correct 

If BHB is >1 pg use the greater of either 1 pg or 5% of BH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

Mercury 

Fraction 

Sample 

Hg 

Fid Blk 

Hg 

Default 

Value 

HS 

5% of 

Sample 

Hg 

Corrected 

Amount Hg 

Hg 

FRONT HALF 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

BACK HALF 0.00 0,00 6.00 0.00 0.00 

! TOTAL Hg 0.00 

CLIENT: Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

PROGRAM : 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 

RUN NO. Run 3 

If FB is >0 but <=6 pg then use the FB value to correct 

If FB is >6 pg use the greater of either 6 pg or 5% of FH 

( ) Not Detected / Reportable Detection Limit 

* Indicates value used for blank correction 
ENS R j ALC.Oivi EFA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

: : : JMPiJ«;Kftvoi'& :: 1 Orsat 

Sampling Train f\ Barometric Pressure J ^ ,55 LEAK CHECKS In "Hg x-iwrr.x-x :TJNXL:::- : t RINSE :co2: or 

Kun Number (K{ Static Pressure (+/-) — n INITIAL VAC. (C. In. CFM • oc/-l /0£, 0 j / 

7 5 Client ProbeyPltot Number f\S ' MID VAC. In. CFM 7 5 

Facility Locatlou U N. i i 3 - Wt£. f , X L Pitot Coefficicut •S'l . .. FINAL VAC. In. CFM . 0 0 ' 10.0 Source Killer Box No. UB +/-/ + - <0 1 Vo o 10.0 

Date Of,- Meter Boi No. fioTSM INIT. PITOT * * FINAL PITOT 

T T loo Operator Cf. til,- AUS J Orifice Coefficient (V) | .OP"? FILTER DATA T T loo 

Slack Ula. - lu. 1 ? " Delta H (ii; 1.9,331 I: :NOMBER: T.ARfc • 

Start Time 3(3 /fill . Nozzle Slie/No. •M*l 

Stop Time XAD Thermocouple ID: -— : ::--.-:SIUCASEL:-:-:-:-: 1 Final Purge Rate 

Imp Outlet TC ID: L I - u Final PH 

SAMPLE; CLOCK VELOCITY ORitflCr! C A S METER TEMPERATUR E READINGS . °F PUMP 

POINT XJM K MJETTKRVOL. VOLUME OR(S4ifiJ$::; VACUUM ; 

Oel/iiP, In wc l>e|ffiH,ln*c re STACK PROHE IMPIfWiEK •N fed* 

0 o i 2M1 — bl 102 r 2 • \ a M X <}<?/.lo J O ? W — foH \b1 i 

3 IS • ts n q 2 ^ 2£ \ 2 *3 — /<5<7 

iool . 9 3 8 1 AUG 3 ^ — " 5ft IM lo<-( J 

i 15 i q ( 1*9 — lob 3 

3 1 5 •it I-5D lfl ? 9 ASS a m V\K — Ml >C7 3 

1 ^5 1.(3 10(5 .0 XH1 -166 

IT \.H( lo JJ.<? J&A. 23§ — low 

R ( 60 • lob lon . 1 a sa 6( IK 

a 61. S • if 1,32 / o 31. 5 32.3 — SO 113 l/l 

• n 1.03 J8<? S o M S III Si 

T M l ,oqo.<? A HI — 5"/ uc» KI 

5 90 • « " iO %. 0 190 2HO 2H1 53 KG t a a. 

IT 1.4/ 10 SB-4 387 US ZHO — 112-

7 (05 U O 105 C • I M$ — i n «? 

^-<5... •17 \.L0 io6o.q TjH i n ^? 

r 

• - '" - — r 

• i 

!!;:•:::::•;::: j:;;;:;;:!;:;::;^ 
ENS R EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train <H3^ 

Run Number 

C'llcut 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date 

-E2. 

/ fU 

WjeVr- , I L 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure 07-) 

Probe/Pilot Number 

Pilot Coefficient _ 

Filter Box No. 

Meter Box No. 

^5-1- B 

•JtL 

..HfiJL 

_aeis!L 

LEAK CHECKS la "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. | f In. CFM '.Q6 3 

MID VAC. lu. CFM 

FINAL VAC. ~J 

+ 

INIT. PITOT 

CFM • j .QQ l 

FINAL PITOT j/'tX 

FILTE R DATA 

Stack Dia. - in. V i " Delta H(tt 1.932 -XNUMBER-:-: :-::-TABE: 

Start Time rook Nozzle Size/No. 

Stop Time XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Oullct TC ID: H3o , a 

IMRINRBltVOt'S. 

IMT:! 

IPC 

Jc<? 

56_ 

TbTAX. 

•MMXL-:-: 

3 ^ 

RINSE 

too 

SILICA GEL 

SAMPLE 

?QiNT 

t-'LOCK 

XtMK 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Delta?, In Wf 

MBTKRVOL 

Pe|laH,|n*f 

CAS MfcfUR 

VOLUME 

re 

TEMPERATUR E READINGS, "F ttmr 

VACUUM 

*r>H« 

COMMENTS 

SAMPLE 

?QiNT 

t-'LOCK 

XtMK 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Delta?, In Wf 

MBTKRVOL 

Pe|laH,|n*f 

CAS MfcfUR 

VOLUME 

re STACK OVEN IMPINGE* 

f!;||:li(^WE*8K!!!i:| 

ttmr 

VACUUM 

*r>H« 

COMMENTS 

SAMPLE 

?QiNT 

t-'LOCK 

XtMK 

VELOCITY 

HEAD 

Delta?, In Wf 

MBTKRVOL 

Pe|laH,|n*f 

CAS MfcfUR 

VOLUME 

re STACK OVEN IMPINGE* iliiiSilllir :i:;:i«)r|i1r;:i;;; 

ttmr 

VACUUM 

*r>H« 

COMMENTS 

Al 0 JOfVr, .77A 2 S3 . 5 1 1 — 

2 l.< • 1 0 .qa 393. — &l 106 

i i< • Ife 1015 . 2 7<?k stHo Z Yf i & 103 

H 22.< 1-44 3 9 ^ 2 HO 2 ^ 5 7 (II 

s IT i.aq 3 2 7 0H^ -

r«r 1(1 ios 

l 11.< 15 1.39 loQo -9 J95 > XH< . ux /£>6 

7 HC • 1 8 1.66 /o<Jk. | 5 3 / 0 7 

8 i).< \S * llo\ 8 no f « iit, l o ? 

Sk*Pfc / (S HOfo 

JH LO •18 1-44 39 P I ? W Ho no T 

a. 

- ty 3S« ?Hr> — I S 1 «/ « / H 

3 |.4fe isn. » p ^ f M l 1 H A 1 

H u - r .»£ 1-HI 1133. 1 — l 6 113 5 

s • W l . a aMI . a s i 

97 5 it> l H 7 II3N . 5 p t MY. 

7 • Nf l/Ji. S ana (2( IW 

fl .W H«W,4 -

1^ uc y 

; 

—i 

i 

i 

j -

—j_, .,. 

! 

1 

Orut 

C02 .02: 

7 - 6 

Final Purge Bate 

Final PH 
ENS R i Ai.CGrv, E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

Sampling Train 

Run Num ber 

Clicut 

Facility Locatlou 

Source 

Date 

Operator 

Stack Ola. - lu. 

Start Tline 

Stop Time 

3 -fWMg 31 

3 ^ " 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure(•»/•) - • |C 

Probe/Pleot Number 

Pitot Coefficient 

Filter Bo* No. 

Meter Boi No. 

Orifice Coefficient (Y) 

Delta II (S> 

Noizlc Size/No, 

XAD Thcrmocoupie ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

LEAK CHECKS In "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. It. 

MID VAC. 

MI 

FINAL VAC H , M 

ia. CFM • OOgL 

In. CFM 

CFM 

IN1T. PITOT FINAL PITOT V A 

\0Q1 FILTER DATA 

JUL 

: :NDMBER: : :-:-:-TXBE:-X 

iMPixcEiivofs: :: 

•.•ma,. 

JJiR. 

FINAL 

/aszzz 

SILICA GEL: 

mz, ?-1 v3i T 

•RINSE 

Or sat 

C02: ::o2:-

7 M < U 

1-1 U 

I f U 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

SAMPLK: 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TSME 

VELOC U V 

HLAB 

OtUap,|owc 

MKT HU. VOL 

Oe|taH,(B¥(c 

<! A* METER 

YOLOMF. 

ff 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, "F 

PROBE 

ORGSANfC 

MO^UUj: 

«AS METER 

. tf?ne 

VACUUM 

^nnri 11 I ni Ti 

COMMENTS 

A L XL ISA. OM- U- LS J-35 1^5 a 4 ^ C|2. 

iSL • IV 371 . 

•IM ib5. ) IK \Oto 

s 3 0 i i i 3SS 2M. JL2_ 

2 1 1 SL JUL ML 

3a"i ,2 so 1/6 

i l l 1± JlL 16 9 

FT 

V in 

Z33L 112. J l L 4 

I-S 3 S i l l JIL 

A X 2L1 2H0 

3 CO 

1.6 Ji2_ 

J L 

< n c 

IPS' 10,5 

130 

•10 

J^L L 

I-oft 277. q 

,3 10 A H 

JiL L 

2J±L S 3 

J I L 

_liiL. 

U S 

T 

4-
PCDD/PCDF Data 
Veolia ES Technical Solutions 

Fixed Hearth Incinerator #3 

Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

Run No. R un 1 Run 2 Run 3 

AVGS 

Date 19-Jun-06 20-Jun-06 21-Jun-06 

AVGS 

Start Time Units 14:40 9:30 9:30 

Stop Time 17:59 13:05 11:43 AVGS 

Nozzle Diameter inches 0.435 0.435 0.435 0.435 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.55 29.50 29.50 29.52 

Net Sampling Time min. 192.0 192.0 192.0 192.0 

Volume Metered , dcf 135.215 136.331 133.046 134.864 

Avg. DGM Temp. °F 109.3 [ ib'7.i 107.9 108.1 

Avg Delta H in HaO 1.71 1.74 1.67 1.71 

Avg Delta H in. Hg 0.1257 0.1282 0.1225 0.1255 

DGM Calibration Factor -

1.0320 1.0320 1.0320 1.0320 

Gas Sample Volume dscf 128.363 129.710 126.379 128.151 

Total Water Collected mL 2171.7 2509.0 2250.4 2310.4 

Volume of Water Vapor scf 102.396 118.299 106.106 108.934 

Moisture (measured) % v/v 44.4 47.7 45.6 45.9 

Moisture (@ saturation) % v/v 101.3 101.5 101.5 101.4 

Dry Mole Fraction, 100-%M " 0.5563 0.5230 0.5436 0.5410 

C 0 2 at Stack % d ry 7.40 7.60 7.40 7.47 

6 2 at Stack %dry 10.00 8.20 9.60 9.27 

CO + N2 %dry 82.60 84.20 83.00 83.27 

Dry Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 29.58 29.54 29.57 29.57 

Wet Molecular Weight Ib/lb-mole 24.44 24.04 24.29 24.26 

Excess Air at Stack % 84.7 58.5 78.0 73.7 

Stack Diameter inches 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 

Stack Area sq. in. 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 1194.6 

Static Pressure in H2 0 -0.13 -0.15 -0.17 -0.15 

Stack Pressure in. Hg 29.54 29.49 29.49 29.51 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 390.4 393.1 385.0 389.5 

Avg. Sqroot of Delta P -

0.4113 0.4166 0.4062 0.4114 

SDE Average -- 11.994 12.168 11.808 11.990 

Pitot Coefficient -- 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Stack Gas Velocity afpm 1,923 1,969 1,901 1,931 

Stack Flowrate wet acfm 15,956 16,338 15,773 16,022 

Stack Flowrate wet scfm 9,781 9,966 9,713 9,820 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,441 5 2 5,280 5,311 

Isokinetics % 99 104 100 101 

Meter Box No. — 80645 80645 80645 ~ 

Delta H @ in. Hg 1.881 1.881 1.881 -

Field QA Yqc -

1.048 1.050 1.052 1.050 

[Deviation] Pre-Y /o 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 1.7% 

S:\_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performance TesftTest DataVlune 2006\2nd Retest\lM23A Separate Front, Back Half june 200S.xls]DATA 
Method 0023A Sampling Parameters 

PT 

RUN 1 AVGS -- PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 2 AVGS -- PCDDs/PCDFs RUN 3 AVGS -- PCDDs/PCDFs 

PT DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

DP SQRT 

DP 

DGM 

IN 

DGM 

OUT 

DH STACK 

TEMP 

A1 0.22 0.4690 103 100 2.20 389 0.14 0.3742 94 93 1.40 387 0.14 0.3742 96 95 1.40 370 

1 0.25 0.5000 105 101 2.50 389 0.14 0.3742 95 93 1.40 386 0.11 0.3317 97 95 1.10 380 

2 0.25 0.5000 114 103 2.50 389 0.20 0.4472 96 94 2.00 389 0.15 0.3873 98 96 1.50 382 

2 0.21 0.4583 115 105 2.10 389 0.20 0.4472 99 95 2.00 388 0.16 0.4000 101 97 1.60 385 

3 0.22 0.4690 116 106 2.20 390 0.20 0.4472 101 96 2.00 390 0.15 0.3873 102 97 1.50 385 

3 0.21 0.4583 117 108 2.10 389 0.20 0.4472 105 97 2.00 390 0.15 0.3873 105 99 1.50 386 

4 0.12 0.3464 117 109 1.20 390 0.20 0.4472 104 99 2,00 391 0.17 0.4123 107 100 1.70 388 

4 0.16 0.4000 115 108 1.60 389 0,15 0.3873 106 . 100 1,50 392 0.17 0.4123 107 101 1.70 388 

5 0.20 0.4472 116 109 2.00 390 0.18 0.4243 108 101 1.80 392 0.14 0.3742 106 104 1.40 390 

5 0.16 0.4000 116 108 1.60 389 0.20 0.4472 108 102 2.00 393 0.17 0.4123 107 104 1.70 390 

6 0.16 0.4000 115 109 1.60 391 0.20 0.4472 109 103 2.00 391 0.20 0.4472 109 105 2.00 391 

6 0.14 0.3742 115 108 1.40 391 0.20 0.4472 109 103 2.00 387 0.15 0.3873 110 105 1.50 390 

7 0.13 0.3606 114 109 1.30 383 0.15 0.3873 109 104 . 1.50 384 0.20 0.4472 113 107 2.00 391 

7 0.15 0.3873 114 108 1.50 383 0.17 0.4123 108 104 1.70 385 0.20 0.4472 113 107 2.00 391 

8 0.13 0,3606 113 108 1.30 387 0.15 0.3873 108 104 1.50 384 0.20 0.4472 114 107 2.00 390 

8 0.14 0.3742 112 105 1.40 388 0.15 0.3873 110 104 1.50 390 0.20 0.4472 115 108 2.00 391 

B1 0.17 0.4123 105 106 1.70 392 0.15 0.3873 107 107 1.50 384 0.12 0.3464 109 108 1.20 327 

1 0.17 0.4123 107 106 1.70 392 0.14 0.3742 109 107 1.40 392 0.12 0.3464 109 107 1.20 313 

2 0.19 0.4359 108 106 1.90 394 0.12 0.3464 112 108 1.20 396 0.20 0.4472 110 107 2.00 371 

2 0.17 0.4123 109 105 1.70 394 0.18 0.4243 113 108 1.80 398 0.20 0.4472 113 109 2.00 393 

3 0.15 0.3873 110 106 1.50 394 0.18 0.4243 115 109 1.80 399 0.20 0.4472 114 109 2.00 393 

3 0.15 0.3873 111 106 1.50 395 0.18 0.4243 115 110 1.80 399 0.20 0.4472 115 109 2.00 394 

4 0.13 0.3606 111 107 1.30 388 C.19 0.4359 115 110 1.90 400 0.18 0.4243 114 109 1.80 393 

4 0.10 0.3162 112 107 1.00 383 0.19 0.4359 115 110 1.90 400 0.18 0.4243 115 110 1.80 395 

5 0.15 0.3873 112 107 1.50 388 0.17 0,4123 115 112 1.70 401 0.12 0.3464 115 110 1.20 394 

5 0.16 0.4000 112 107 1.60 390 0.15 0.3873 ' 116 111 1.50 400 0.14 0.3742 115 111 1.40 388 

6 0.18 0.4243 112 107 1.80 394 0.17 0.4123 116 111 1.70 399 0.14 0.3742 115 112 1.40 395 

6 0.20 0.4472 112 107 2.00 393 0.17 0.4123 116 112 1.70 398 0.13 0.3606 116 111 1.30 395 

7 0.17 0.4123 112 107 1.70 395 0.18 0.4243 117 113 1.80 399 0.13 0.3606 115 111 1.30 395 

7 0.17 0.4123 112 107 1.70 

1.80 

395 0.20 0.4472 116 113 2.00 398 0.17 0.4123 116 112 1.70 395 

8 0.18 0.4243 112 107 

1.70 

1.80 395 0.18 . 0.4243 116 113 1.80 398 0.22 0.4690 116 112 2.20 395 

8 0.18 0.4243 112 107 1.80 395 0.20 0.4472 115 113 2.00 399 0.22 0.4690 116 111 2.20 396 

AVG 0.17 0.4113 109.3 1.71 390 0.17 0.4166 107.1 1.74 393 0.17 0.4062 107.9 1.67 385 
ENS R 

Sampling Train M &3 A Dlt>Y I Wl 

EFA ISOKINETIC SAMPLIN G FIELD DATA SHEET 

Barometric Pressure 

Facility Location 

i i 

Run Number 

"s TM«"» _ 

V %.J Date 

N^^^^^X Operator 

Stack Uia. - io^ 

Sturt Time 

Stop Time 

QAVf < 

Static Pressure (+/-) — Q , / J% 

s i )6r- C,>, ; rl- -- O >J | T 3 

/ W o 

Probe/Pilot Number 

Pilot CoefficleDt 

Filler Box No. 

Meter Boi No. 

Orifice Coefficieut (Yl 

Delta H Si, 

Nozzle SlulNo. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

Q(g y,r 

LEAK CHECKS lu "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. / 5 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 11> 

ui. 

ID. 

lo. 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

INIT. PITOT 

+ 

FINAL PITOT 

/ t ef?/. 

FILTER DATA 

: :NOMBER : : TARE 

g^v i 

:INIT;: 

/ o< 

/ 0 o 

•T.INAL:-:-

3 ^ 

SIUCAGEL 

HINSE 

Oreat 

C02: 02: 

7 . C v.? 

(0,0 

3 # vs. a 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

SAMPLE 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vfiUK'UY 

mso 

Brlrap, IB wc 

OR1MCI2 

MCTfiftVOI, 

MlaH |u*c 

«AS METUR 

VOLOMF. 

re 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. °F 1 

VACUUM C0MM£«TS 

SAMPLE 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vfiUK'UY 

mso 

Brlrap, IB wc 

OR1MCI2 

MCTfiftVOI, 

MlaH |u*c 

«AS METUR 

VOLOMF. 

re STACK 

ORGAFilt* 

MO0UlJt :iMPi|w;ii&: 

VACUUM C0MM£«TS 

SAMPLE 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vfiUK'UY 

mso 

Brlrap, IB wc 

OR1MCI2 

MCTfiftVOI, 

MlaH |u*c 

«AS METUR 

VOLOMF. 

re STACK 

ORGAFilt* 

MO0UlJt :iMPi|w;ii&: IN 

VACUUM C0MM£«TS 

/ 0 r^3/ ^2 //< ? <?v7 

/ 5>C~ J / «. /?<3£3 ^r?f

 5 /oS / « / //,<r pb<Z 'T CHftf"f£~ 

0. / A <o. <3.<T JSlV , V/ / 3 8 1 e? vy /'/¥ /O 7, t/. r L£6u. CHIC 

2- / V 6 . .3 / 0?. / 3S? . C o //,T /oS~ /AO O , 0&3 ^/S'/M. 

3 O , 3S L a . 3 - 3 ^ A ? y 

—"« * //(* /OC /o.r a 

t? , ^ / 5 . / ^ y ? • t i l / 0 $ /-0.S4- 3 9 o c ^ y ^ / I 7 /ol 7,0 

w ?_ 0. f(o c?y7 . //. ? 5 8 ? ^ 8 Joe Q, 0 

¥ K n, ri p //ft /of /O.- 0 

S ' f J 3 7 C ( /OQ ?, 0 

6,0 ~n.'/ L /o9 s-'.r 

0 , / y 31l /o7

1 / ? . \ 

7 7 * 0 1 / N3 A3 71 loia d 3 6 3 ^>37 - v/y /oe c?.rO 

• 7 6 0 . A T A C QU ,(2t* 3 * 3 4 3 t h /oi 

8 S f / / 3 375 , 365 " 3&7 - <?3 7 ^ 2 . l/S /OS 

8 <7o ^« m /' ¥ C379. .^3 3 6 / //& /oS 

sn>f° 

l £>, 1 ?- i< 7 - r ^ L tor /or 

1 /o7- n, / ^ A 7 olfi7 , 66 6 /&/, /o ,0 

? • / ' / «?5- y /Ob /4.r 

lf¥ £ 7 , A 7 / , > ^-y y ^57 /o f /Oto zo, r 

^ 1*0 n. i $ / . r ( ( 0 /o<r /o,<r 

2 €,/<r /,.<c AOS.O/I ^ 3 7 m /0J> 

4- 1 ^T, 0,13 A ,£30 tH /Ok 

O./o ^ j / . "7^1 < r / k /Ql 

IH4 p . / r~ {< <~ 6/ L , Z tfr^K /<?7 /o, n 

ST }<n> f,(» L-\ / / A /07 - />* 0 

0. / 8 /,fi Co /07 -

xo /07 - /(? «-0 
ENS R ECOPvi EPA ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T 

Sampling Train Afg^3 A 

Run Number / 

Clleut OM V y 

K

"

clli, y Loc.lluD <^r. |.„; c M O 

Operator fvlp 

Sl»ck Dia. - lu. ^.ncU^ S 

Start Tluie / 1/ dfc, /4^ J 

s,opTlm e

 /fe/o £ 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-)_ 

Probc/PUot Number 

Pilot Coefficient _ 

Filter Bon No. 

Meter Boi No. 

Orifice Coefficient (Y) 

Delta H @ 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

"Q,/3 

M V -f t MIDVAC._ 

LEAK CHECKS lu "Hg 

INITIAL VAC. 

FINAL VAC. I?, 

In. 

In. 

In. 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

door 

INIT. PITOT SS FINAL PITOT 

FILTE R DAT A 

Q,¥3<C 

NUMBER : : •:: TARE : 

A / : SIUCACFX : 

RINSE 

Orsat 

:co2: : 02 : 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

SAMPLS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vsLocit y 

IfflAB 

Oe|»p, |n wc 

METfeRVOL 

PeMl.lBWf 

«A& MtTCR. 

VOLUME 

re 

TEMPERATURE READINGS. °F 

VACUUM 

*»,&«• 

C0S4MPKTS 

SAMPLS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vsLocit y 

IfflAB 

Oe|»p, |n wc 

METfeRVOL 

PeMl.lBWf 

«A& MtTCR. 

VOLUME 

re STACK 

ORGANIC 

MO0l)L4r 

;i:i;i;£*$M^i2Ri:i:;;i; VACUUM 

*»,&«• 

C0S4MPKTS 

SAMPLS 

POINT 

CLOCK 

TIME 

vsLocit y 

IfflAB 

Oe|»p, |n wc 

METfeRVOL 

PeMl.lBWf 

«A& MtTCR. 

VOLUME 

re STACK 

ORGANIC 

MO0l)L4r "' cfti " 

VACUUM 

*»,&«• 

C0S4MPKTS 

7 rs. 11 //7 - 335 . 6 y /oj- //< r 

7 m 0, li - 3 3 <i. 6. 6fe /°?~ / A , r 

l&o ft, 19, 

, ?Vo ,y £y-3 J 3 7 SS f f /o 7- ta.o 

ft 0 > /ft A § jy\r •ST?-

/<?'>-

i' 

~1 

• 

! 
ENS R '•\ZK..\I r EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

Sampling Train 

Run Number 

CH 

.2=. 

cut 

Facility Locaflou 

Source 

Dale 

Operator 

Slack Dia. • lu. 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

±m,r ft 

am 

4-UX 

</2j 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) 

Probe/Pitot Number 

Pilot Coefficient 

Filler Box No. 

Meter Box Nu. 

Orifice Coefficient (V) 

Delia H @ 

Nozzle Size/No, 

3 g 

LEAK CHECKS lu 

INITIAL VAC. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

INIT. PITOT 

lu. 

In. 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

00*3 

.003. 

FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

XAD Tbermocouple ID; -tf j$T~ 

Imp Outlet TC ID: LjZ-JX 

NUMBER ::>.TARE::-: 

M A -

JMPlNCKIl VOt'Sl: 

INIT;! 

L*0 

i 0 o 

FJNAL : :. 

7Wo 

6 3 3 

3 23 T S"P 

3IT -

: SILICA EEL :•: 

W.7 I ViT. g 

KINSE 

Orsat 

C02: : :oi . 

BlFinal Purge Rate 

Final PH 
ENS R AECO M 

Sampling Train /4?^.J 

Run Number 

Clicut 

Facility Location 

Source 

Date 

Operator 

Stack Dla. 

Start Tune 

Stop Tluie 

E P A ISOKINETI C SAMPLIN G - FIEL D DAT A SHEE T &LG 2 2-

-In. 

b-lit ~ 

Barometric Pressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) 

Probe/Pitot Number 

Pitot Coefficient 

Filter Box No. 

Meter Boi No. 

Orifice Coefficient (V) 

Delta H @ 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

LEAK CHECKS in "Ug ^ 

INITIAL VAC. in. 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

_ln. 

In. 

CFM 

CFM 

CFM 

Q6> <PS' INIT. PITOT *S't/x FINAL PITOT sa 

FILTER DATA 

•:-:NOMBE»:-: :-:;-TABF;'-'-'-

j>hSLY 

: iMfii}«5fiR.V(H/&:. 

MNITi! HNXLX 

: SIUCABED: 

RINSE 

Orsat 

:C<M: <)2: 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

SAMM* 

POINT TIME 

VOuOOlTV 

Delia JMBWC 

ORIFlCB 

MfiTBRVOX 

ttellaH |n«e 

«AS MITER 

VOLOMK 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F

 : 

VACUUM COMMENTS 

SAMM* 

POINT TIME 

VOuOOlTV 

Delia JMBWC 

ORIFlCB 

MfiTBRVOX 

ttellaH |n«e 

«AS MITER 

VOLOMK 

STACK 

VACUUM COMMENTS 

SAMM* 

POINT TIME 

VOuOOlTV 

Delia JMBWC 

ORIFlCB 

MfiTBRVOX 

ttellaH |n«e 

«AS MITER 

VOLOMK 

STACK • • j>i • • 

VACUUM COMMENTS 

T ILK 5/V. / A w ii7 //; 7 •

x

9 1.0 MS 0>b> u i /.* 7-SD (o^r 4.6 /;/.•> hi d 

f) •J-O Ml fry ytfr 

i°\i~ 52*. KG-

'—1— s—f 
•NSK 

Suii!|tlinn Bruin 

Run Number 

Clii'iU 

l iivllilj' Location 

Source 

Dntu 

Operator 

Stack Dia. - in. 

Siurl l ime 

S(o|i Time 

3 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING 

"C>(0 Uiuuniclilc Pressure cfFIELD DATA SHEET 

•9 ' 

M a ft 

1 2 1 

Uuruiiietrlc Pressure 

Sialic Pressure (+/-) 

Prube/I'ilut Number 

Pilul Coefficient 

Miter Box No. 

Meier l)o.\ No. 

Orifice Coefficient (Y) 

Delta II ® 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple ID: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

a rf* 

LEAK CHECKS In "Hg 

INITIAL VAC, /( g 

MID VAC. 

FINAL VAC. 

In. 

In. 

In. 

C F M 

C F M 

C F M 

6*003 

INIT. PITOT FINAL PITOT 

FILTER DATA 

Q"gc— 

-4-4-

XNUMBER : . TARE : 

•iMtfiNGKetyoL's:;:;: 

•INIT:! 

IT 

too 

FINAL : 

7xT 

3. 

7 S 

: SILICA GEL : 

2SI 

RINSE 

Orsat 

coz: : 02 : 

i f 

i f 

Final Purge Rate 

Final PH 

SAMtUi 

POINT 

<'l.0( K 

I IMF. 

vi.LOCllY 

HI Al> 

: Delia IYIU -WC:: 

OlUFlO' 

MET lill VOL 

::l>etfulli:lllWC:: 

OAS Mk I I'H 

YOLUMIft 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, °F 

S1AIK PKOttE OveN 

PRI3ANK! 

MODULE: JlMPlfVflER 

<;A*M£TI;R 

:lff:; f>V* 

tMf 

VACUUM COMMfcNU 

T7d~ JK 3£ 3 1 

IL ZCtO i f 1 3 £ I2_ T I S A 

3M21 L>^ " 

4&L < ? 7 

2Jeo_ 2. 3^ 4 S 1 44 *-Y7 100 

Z Z z a S£2Z ^27 

J£© _ J i L 1K SZ7.73 - / # 7 

7 . 0 2 1 Z s : 

tl6 It rS~ 3 1 o z l 7 7 D 75T 5 

-72. n^9 ^fLL 331 .43 77T _lO. 

£2^ to iD 

X . Q ~JJZ2 

10 n.,0 5 r U 2JL? £ 7 M23. JjQ_ 

4 f -

1 X/ 2-* 7W 7^: 

AO. 

1 0 - 3 (3 2t? 5 ^ 

1 2 'XH1 JJO_ 

. i d 

3=5. 

fo6 

kit . 

4Q 

J2. -a 1 3 0 ^ /_D_ 

4-

J21 L6-

I t 

z n JIS : 

JZ£ > 

± U S i^Z _ 3k M4 
ENSR d:v.. O f 

Sumpling I ruin 

Kun Number 

Client 

Futility Location 

Source 

Dale 

Operator 

Slack Din. - in. 

Start Time 

Stop l iiue 

3> ko**H 

EPA ISOKINETIC SAMPLING - FIELD DATA SHEET 

"2 f-5 " 

rr, U3^is> PIP . 

liiiiuiiietiIv 1'ressure 

Static Pressure (+/-) 

l'robu/Pilut Number /h£T^¥ ~~A~ 

Pititt Coefficient 

U sJ CT -tfc "3 "J G/t J-JVKi< Killer Box No. 

LEAK CHECKS In "Hg 

INITIAL VA C /0 

M I D VAC . 

FINAL VAC. 

Meier Dux No, 

Orifice Coellicient (Y) 

DeUa II ® 

Nozzle Size/No. 

XAD Thermocouple IU: 

Imp Outlet TC ID: 

C F M •o.cK>£ 

C F M 

CFM o 

I NIT. PITOT 

+ 

FINAL NTOT (A 

FILTER DATA 

NDMIIEB : : : TARI; : : 

•.•mtxMseik VOL'S; 

: IWIT;: : : :|: T:INAL 

z 

•SILICABEL: 

KINSE 

Orsat 

:C02: ::02 :• 

U 

Final Purge Rale 

Final I'll 

SAMPU, 

POINT 

<'LIX K 

If Mil IJIAD 

DcllaPilu wc 

inr * 

ORll'TCF 

MeTlbR-USL 

DC|IUII,IH-KC 

<;AbMLIl1H 

YOl vmIP 

TEMPERATURE READINGS, "F 

PROW: OVFN 

PRGSAWK.' 

MODULE lMPifS<jKR 

0A5MJTI PR 

IN 0(IT 

VACUUM COMMENTS 

1 3 : "V T 5 I 

7 

4 ^ -

3 r -4 .iZ2= 

9. s s : IE 2 ? 

7 3 7 

- 4 

I E 

^-2r ~ £1 U L 2f£~ 
ENSR 

Appendix C 

Reference Method Calibrations, Verifications, and Certifications 

S:\_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performanoe Test\Report\Onyx 2006 

Test Report.doc 

September 2006 
ENS R AECOM 

DRY GAS METER CALIBRATION 

Meter Box No.: 80754 

Check one: 

Annual Calibration Recalibration 

Date: 3/14/2006 1 

Operator James Ruckdeschel | 

Barometric Pressure: 28.55 (in Hg)| 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 13.47 (in Hg)f 

Pretest Leak Checks 

Manufacturer. 

Date Received/Placed in service: 

Serial No.: 

Anderson NUTECH 

Pre 1990 

80754 

I Allowable Actual g 

| Positive 0 0.00 | 

1 (al 5 - 7 in. H2 0) in. H2 0 per min. I 

| Negative 0 0.000 | 

| (at 3 in. Hg) cfm d m | 

DRY GAS METER DATA CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA 

Time 

(min) 

Volume Tern 3 Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # 

K' Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(in Hg) 

Ambient Temperature | 

AH 

(in H2 0) 

Time 

(min) 

Initial 

(ft3) 

Final 

(ft3) 

Total 

(ft3) 

Initial Final 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # 

K' Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(in Hg) 

AH Initial Final Average I 

(in H2 0) 

Time 

(min) 

Initial 

(ft3) 

Final 

(ft3) 

Total 

(ft3) °F °F 

Critical 

Orifice 

Serial # 

K' Orifice 

Calibration 

Coefficient 

Actual 

Vacuum 

(in Hg) °F °F °F | 

0.24 20 677.300 683.170 5.870 69 70 48 0.225 15 68 68 68 j 

0.91 15 691.800 700.156 8.356 74 74 52 0.427 15 69 73 71 I 

1.50 15 711.600 722.613 11.013 76 79 63 0.562 15 73 74 74 j 

3.80 10 733.800 744.590 10.790 81 83 76 0.831 15 72 73 73 

I 

CORRECTE D VOLUME 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Vm (std ft3) 

Critical | I DRY GA S METER 

Orifice I J CALIBRATION 

Ver (std ft3) j J FACTOR Y 

| DRY GAS METER 

I CALIBRATION 

I FACTOR AH ® 

5.587 5.591 J 1.001 -0.006 | 1.727 -0.104 

7.899 7.936 J 1.005 0.00 1.829 -0.003 

10.359 10.420 I 1.006 0.00 J 1.748 -0.083 

10.124 10.281 I

 1

-

0 1 6 0.01 j 2.022 0.19 I 

s 

r°Avg.AH @ 1_jg2_J 

Notes: 1) For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

2) The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', must be entered in English units, (fl^'ldeg Rv>0.5/((in.Hg)*(min)). 

3) The minimum number ot sample volume required per oritice is 5 cubic feet. 

4) For Calibration Factor Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration meter to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is ±0.C 

5) For Orifice Calibration Factor AH® , the orifice differential pressure in inches of H2 0 that equates to 0.75 cfm of air at 68 Fand 29.92 inches of Hg, 

acceptable tolerance of individual values Irom the average is ± 0.2. 

Dry Gas Meter Thermocouple Calibration 

I Ref. TCID# Fluke RTD 213103J Inlet ID#: 80754-IN Outlet ID#: 80754-OUT 

I Ref. Source Ref, °F °F A °F A 

I Amb. Air 65 66 •-1 66 1 

r Hot Water 

106 106 0 104 -2 

Potentiometer Calibration 

Low 50 °F 50 

| Mid 450 °F 450 

La? h 

950 °F . 952 

Notes: 1)

 H ° t Water to be in the range of 104 -122 °F. 

2) Tolerance allowed for ali thermocouple individual readings : ± 5.4 °F 

3) Tolerance allowed for all potentiometer individual readings: ± 2 °F 

,,,„,= n .64 (v, )-n + 

AH 

13 .6 

- 460 

Vr^ +460 

Y = ^CT (sld 

m {sid ) 

' .150 Y 
ENS R AECOM 

DRY GA S METE R CALIBRATION 

Meter Box No.: 80645 

Check one: 

Annual Calibration Recalibration 

[bate: 12/27/2005 j 

Ijoperator: Ryan Burns j 

Barometri c Pressure : 29.50 (inHpj J 

[Theoretical Critical Vacuum : 13.92 (in Hg)| 

Manufacturer. 

Date Received/Placed in service: 

Serial No.: 

Anderson NUTECH 

Pretest Leak Checks | 

Allowable Actual | 

Positive 0 0.00 i 

I (at 5 - 7 in. H2 0) in. H 2 0 per min. 1 

Negative 0 0.000 J 

(at 3 in. Hg) cfm cfm S 

DRY GAS METER DATA CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA 

Volume Temp Critical K' Orifice Actual Ambient Temperature | 

AH Time Initial Final Total Initial Final Orifice Calibration Vacuum Initial Final Average § 

(in H2 0) (min) (ft3

) (ft3

) (ft3) °p °F Serial tt Coefficient (in Hg) °F °F °F i 

0.26 20 826.500 832.327 5.827 81 81 40 0.225 15 68 68 68 I 

0.99 15 811.800 819.950 8.150 8 3 83 52 0.427 15 68 68 68 

1.80 15 777.400 788.205 10.805 80 80 63 0.562 15 68 6 8 68 J 

4.00 10 857.400 868.228 10.828 80 80 76 0.831 15 68 68 68 I 

I I 

CORRECTE D VOLUME J 

Dry Gas Critical | 

Meter Orifice I 

Vm (std ft3) Ver (std ft3

) J 

5.609 5.782 j 

7.830 8.223 | 

10.459 10.825 j 

10.539 10.667 1 

I 

I DRY GA S METER I DRY GA S METER 

CALIBRATION I CALIBRATION 

FACTOR Y | FACTOR AH® 

1.031 -0.001 I 1.750 -0.131 

1.050 0.02 j 1.853 -0.028 

1.035 0.00 I 1.944 0.063 

1.012 -0.02 | 1.977 0.10 

8 I 

Notes: 1) For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg greater lhan the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

2) The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K\ must be entered in English units, (ftyv3*(deg R)*0.5/((in.Hg)-(min)). 

3) The minimum number of sample volume required per orifice is 5 cubic feet. 

4) For Calibration Factor Y. the ratio of the reading of the calibration meter to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average 

5) For Orifice Calibration Factor AH® , the orifice differential pressure in inches ofH2 0 that equates to 0.76 cfm of air at 68 Fand 29.92 inches of Hg, 

acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is ± 0.2. 

| Dry Gas Meter Thermocouple Calibration 

i Ref. T C ID# 2131035 Inlet ID#: 80645-IN Outlet ID#: 80645-OU T 

S Rel. Source Ref, °F °F 

68 

A °F A I 

| Amb. Air 68 

°F 

68 0 68 I 

I Hot Water 112 112 0 111 -1 | 

Potentiometer Calibration 

Low 50 °F 50 

Mid 450 °F 449 

High 950 °F 948 

Notes: 1) Hot Water to be in the range of 104-122 °F. 

2) Tolerance allowed for all thermocouple individual readings : ± 5.4 °F 

3) Tolerance allowed for all potentiometer individual readings : ± 2 °F 

A H 

/ . + 460 rY = 

r (sid ' 

n (sid ) 
ENS R AECOM 

D RY GA S METE R CALIBRATION 

Meter Box No.: 80184 

Check one: 

Annual Calibration Recalibration 

Date: 12/27/2005 [ 

Operator: Ryan Burns \ 

Barometric Pressure: 29.50 (in Hg)| 

Theoretical Critical Vacuum: 13.92 (in Hg)j 

Manufacturer 

Date Received/Placed in service: 

Serial No.: 

Anderson NUTECH 

DRY GA S METER DATA 

g Pretest Leak Checks 

i Allowable Actual 

| Positive 0 0.00 

| (at 5 - 7 in. H2 0) in. H2 0 per min. 

S Negative 0 0.000 

1 (at 3 in. Hg) cfm cfm 

CRITICAL ORIFICE DATA! 

Volume Temp Critical K' Orifice Actual Ambient Temperature | 

AH Time Initial Final Total Initial Final Orifice Calibration Vacuum Initial Final Average 

(in H2 0) (min) (ft3

) (ft3

) (ft3

) °F °F Serial # Coefficient (in Hg) °F °F °F 

0.26 20 103.300 109.115 5.815 78 79 40 0.225 15 68 68 68 

0.99 15 83.300 91.385 8.085 75 76 52 0.427 15 68 68 68 

1.80 15 161.700 172.468 10.768 82 83 63 0.562 15 68 68 68 | 

4.00 10 134.000 144.631 10.631 83 84 76 0.831 15 68 68 68 

CORRECTED VOLUME | 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Vm (std ft3) 

Critical I 

Orifice 

Ver (std ft3) ] 

5.623 5.782 

7.876 8.223 

10.375 10.825 

10.280 10.667 

DRY GA S METER 

CALIBRATION 

I FACTOR Y 

1.028 -0.010 

1.044 0.01 

1.043 0.00 I 

1.038 0.00 I 

1.03B [ 

DRY GA S METER | 

CALIBRATION 

FACTOR AH ® | 

1.750 -0.131 

1.853 -0.028 

1.944 0.063 

1.977 0.10 

|[ Avg. AH ® 1.881 1 

Notes: 1) For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 in. Hg greaterthan the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above. 

2) The Critical Orifice Coefficient, K', must be entered in English units, (ftv^'fdeg RV*j.o7((in.Hg)*(min)). 

3) The minimum number of sample volume required per orifice is S cubic feet. 

4) For Calibration Factor Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration meter to the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is: 

5) For Orifice Calibration Factor AH®, the orifice differential pressure in inches of H2 0 that equates to 0.75 cfm of air at 68 F and 29.92 inches of Hg, 

acceptable tolerance of individual values from the average is ± 0.2. 

Dry Gas Meter Thermocouple Calibration f Potentiometer Calibration 

Ref, T C ID# 2131035 Inlet ID#: 80184-IN Outlet ID#: 80184-OUT| Low 50 °F 50 

Ref. Source Ref, °F °F A °F A S Mid 450 °F 450 

Amb. Air 68 68 0 68 0 i I High 950 °F 951 

Hot Water 111 111 0 111 0 j 

Notes:

 1 ) Hot Water to be in the range of 104 -122 °F. 

2) Tolerance allowed for all thermocouple individual readings: ± 5.4 °F 

3) Tolerance allowed for ali potentiometer individual readings : ± 2 °F 

17 .64 (V„ 

) 13.6 

r + 460 V

f

-

+46 0 

Y = 

' (ad ) 

,(std) 

Afl a =AH ( .159 Y 

-4s,d)J 
ENSR AECO M SAMPLE PROB E CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

TYPE "S" PITOT TUBE ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

Thermocouple Calibration 

PROBE ID: 

M5-4-A 

Reference 

Themomatw ID * 

PROBE ID: ENSR RTD #2131035 Omega CI1000, K06022JCO Omega CI1O00. W6022200 

M5-4-A 

Reference 

Themomatw ID * 

Tut» hmwo (300- - SCO* F) 

PROBE ID: 

M5-4-A 

Reference 

Themomatw ID * 

^.-^•r ——.... . ...— .^..,...........~....„_i•.,...,. 

Mw*M Ilium — tfi. 

* r "* « _ .t^..-

TTi r %ton i. •> 

. .... -- . • F - . f.P. ... 

it>: 3/6/2006 

M5-4-A 

32.59 273.48 34 274 1 212.2 373.3 214 374 0.3 450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

M5-4-A 32.59 273.48 34 274 1 212.1 373.2 214 374 0.3 450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

32.60 273.48 34 274 1 212.0 373.1 214 374 0.3 450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

Sworn* trie Pmuurs 

»Hgl-

 296 5 32.59 273.48 34 274 1 212.1 373.2 214 374 0.3 450.0 505.3 451 506 0.1 

Tvpe "S " Pttot Tube Calibration: 

Dsgr*e ind resting have I poniUon for determ ining ©. 

Level and Perpendicular 

Obstruction 

Damaged 

a, (-10° £ a, £ + 10°) 

aj (-10° £ o^s +10° ) 

B, (-5° £ B, S + 5°) 

G2 (-5°£ B 2 s +5° ) 

y 

e 

2 = ATany(± £ 0.125") 

W = ATan9(± £ 0.03125*] 

D, (3/16 s D t s 3/8") 

A 

A/2D, (1.05 S PA/D,S 1.5) 

No 

0.008 

0.008 

0.375 

Dagrcc indicating tevol posHton for 

Pitot Tube to Nozzle Calibration: 

y»7.B3gnrair..) 

1) Prtoi to nozUo separation 

2) Thermocouple lo pilot seoor. 

3) Pitot end to probe union dbt 

>3/4* (w/,500 noate) 

Probe EntormafEorr 

Manufacturer _ 

bate Received and placed In Service: _ 

Condition ot Probe when placed in service: 

Apex 

pre-1995 

QA/QC Check 

(Completeness X Legibility __X_ 

RECONDITIONED (circle one) 

Accuracy X_ Reasonableness X_ 

certify that the Type S pltot tube/probe ID#_ _ meets or exceeds all Specifications, 

criteria and/or applicable design teatures and is hereby assigned a pitot tube calibration (actor CDo! 0.84 

Certilted by: Fred Sanguedolce / 03-13-2006 , , 

Personnel {Signature/Date) Team Leader (Signature/Date) 

All construction criteria for an isolated "S* type pilot are wfthin gtven toterances prescribed In 

Quality Assurance Handbook tor Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III, Stationary Source-Sped!ic Methods, 

EPA/600/R-94/O38C, September 1994 

-1/067PS 

NOTES: 
ENSR AtCU M SAMPLE PROBE CALIBRATION DA I A t-UH M 

TYP E "S" PITOT TUB E ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

Tnonnocv 3a Calibration 

273.5 2 

273.5 2 

273.5 2 

3 4 

3 4 , 

3 5 

2 7 4 

2 7 4 

2 7 5 

Omaga CI1000, #06022200 

212. 2 

373. 3 

373. 3 

210 

210 

210 3 7 2 

Omaga C110OO, #06022200 

505. 3 

505. 3 

503 -0.4 

504 -0.3 

273.5 2 2 7 4 212. 2 373. 3 21 0 -0.3 450. 0 505. 3 44 7 5 0 3 

Type "S ' Pltot Tubs eviration: 

- £ 

Degree indicating level position lor 

ootominlng'ythen calculate Z. 

Level and Perpendicular 

Obstruction 

Damaged 

a, (-10° £ a, £+10" ) 

(-10° s Otj £ + 10°) 

B, (-5° £ B, £ +5° ) 

B2 (-5° s B 2 £ + 5° ) 

f 

e 

z = ATany(± £ 0.125") 

W = ATan8(± £ 0.03125" ) 

D, (3/16 £ D, £ 3/8") 

A 

A/2D , (1.05 S PA/D,£ 1.5) 

Yes 

No 

No 

0.1 

0.01 4 

0.37 5 

1.18 

Pltot Tube to Nozzle Calibration: 

T B I V t»T.M cm fflo.) 

|1) Pitot to nozzle separation 

2) Thttmocouple to pttot sopor. 

3) Pltot end to probe union dist 

>3/4- (W/.500 nozzle) 

>3.0* 

0.376 

0.97S 

Probe Information 

Manutacturer. 

Date Received and placed In Service: 

jCondttlon of Probe when placed In service: 

Apex 

pre-1995 

QA/QC Check 

ICompleteness X Legibility _X _ 

RECONDITIONED (circle one) 

Accuracy X 

certify that the Type S pilot tube/probe 1D#_ _MS-4'-B_ 

criteria and/or applicable design features and Is hereby assigned a pltot tube calibration (actor CpOt 0.84 

Certified by: Fred Sanguedolce / 03-13-2006 

Personnel (Signature/Date) Team Leader (Signature/Date) 

All construction criteria for an Isolated'S' type pilot are within gtven tolerances prescribed in 

Qualtty Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III, Stationary Source-Specific Methods. 

EPA/60O/R-94/038C, September 1994 

**>v 06/PS 

•PTES: 
ENS R AECO M SAMPLE PROB E CALIBRATION DATA FOR M 

TYPE "S" PITOT TUB E ASSEMBLY AND NOZZLE 

Thermocouple GelOr^tior. 

PROBE D: 

M5-5-F 

Reloroie*. 

Thermomatw 10 «: 

PROBE ENSR RTD #2131035 Omega CI1000. #05022200 Omega CI1O00. #06022200 D: 

M5-5-F 

Reloroie*. 

Thermomatw 10 «: 

Boiling Wate. Tubs Fum»£» (MC - SOO* F) 

PROBE D: 

M5-5-F 

15 -» ^> W "Two ^ -.0»fs—P — - • « 3n*wh* 

. > -» « jst, K J * Vl»»t " 

3A5/2006 

M5-5-F 

32.18 273.25 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 444 502 -0.7 

M5-5-F 32.18 273.25 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 443 501 -0.8 

32.18 273.25 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 443 501 -0.8 

* — 32.18 273.25 33 274 0 211.8 373.0 209 371 -0.4 450.0 505.3 443 502 -0.7 

Type "S " Pitot Tube CaKbtJfictt: 

Level and Perpendicular 

Obstruction 

Damaged 

a, (-10° £ a, £+10° ) 

aj (-10° s aj S +10° ) 

(3, (-5° £ 13, £ + 5°) 

82 (-5°£ 3 2 £ +5° ) 

T 

0 

z = ATany(±- . 0.125") 

W = ATan©(± £ 0.03125") 

D, (3/16 £ 0,-5 3/8") 

A 

A/2D, (1.05 £ PVD, £ 1.5) 

No 

0.3 

0.9 

0.7 

-0.00 6 

0.375 

Oegroo ind tea ting Vaval posh£o*i (or 

dat-tm Inlng? than cafcutat* Z. 

Fitct Tubs to Nozzle Calibration: 

I" H i V a 7.03 on (3 In.) il—[HSU 

1) Pttot to nozzle saparaBon 

2) Inem>ocoupi« ts pilot sapar3) Pitot end to proba union dist 

>aW' (W/.500 nozzle) 

>3JA~ 

>3.£T 

1.027 

1.845 

Probe information 

.Manufacturer Apex 

Date Received and placed tn Service: pre-l&i 

Condition o! Probe when placed in service: NEW I 

QA/QC Check 

Completeness X_ Legibility _X__ 

RECONDITIONED (circle one} 

Accuracy X 

certify that the Type S pltot tube/probe IDfi_ _ meets or exceeds all Specifications. 

criteria and/or applicable design features and Is hereby assigned a pilot tube calibration factor Cflol 0.84 

'Certified by: Fred SanouedolCQ / 03-13-2006 

Personnel (Signature/Date) Team Leader (Signature/Date) 

I All construction criteria for an Isolated "S" type prtot am within given tolerances prescribed In 

Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume lit, Stationary Source-Specttk: Methods. 

IEPA/600/R-94/03SC. September 1994 

V06/PS 

NOTES: 
ENS R 

Ryan Burns 

3/6/2006 

Reference Thremometer ID: DVM CCL050152417 

Last Impinger Thermocouple Calibration 2006 

Thermocouple Reference Difference (+/- 2° ) Thermocouple Reference Difference (+/- 2° ) 

LI-2 

Hot 212 212 0 

LI-21 Hot 211 211 0 LI-2 

Cold 33 32 1 

LI-21 

Cold 33 32 1 

Manufacturer. Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-4 

Hot 211 211 0 

LI-22 

Hot 213 212 1 LI-4 

Cold 33 33 0 

LI-22 

Cold 35 33 2 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-6 

Hot 0 

LI-23 

Hot 211 212 -1 LI-6 

Cold 0 

LI-23 

Cold 35 33 2 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-7 

Hot 212 212 0 LI-24 Hot 0 LI-7 

Cold 33 32 1 

LI-24 

Cold 0 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-8 

Hot 212 212 0 

U-25 

Hot 212 212 0 LI-8 

Cold 34 33 1 

U-25 

Cold 33 32 1 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-9 

Hot 211 212 -1 

LI-26 

Hot 214 212 2 

LI-9 

Cold 33 33 0 

LI-26 

Cold 35 ' 34 1 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-10 

Hot 212 212 0 

LI-27 Hot 210 212 -2 LI-10 

Cold 32 32 0 

LI-27 

Cold 34 33 1 

Manufacturer: Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-11 Hot 0 

LI-28 Hot 212 212 0 LI-11 

Cold 0 

LI-28 

Cold 33 33 0 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-12 

Hot 211 212 -1 

LI-29 

Hot 212 212 0 

LI-12 

Cold 32 32 0 

LI-29 

Cold 33 33 0 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-13 

Hot 213 212 1 

LI-5 

Hot 213 212 1 

LI-13 

Cold 33 33 0 

LI-5 

Cold 34 33 1 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

LI-20 Hot 211 211 0 

LI-14 

Hot 211 211 0 LI-20 

Cold 34 33 1 

LI-14 

Cold 32 33 -1 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: Serial No.: 

Date re ceived/placed in service: Pre 1990 Date received/placed in service: Pre 1990 

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ 
ENS R AECO M 

CaJbrator Fred Sanguedobe flelerence Thermometer Fluke RTD 2131035 

Fitte r Bo x Calibratio n 

Hot Bo x #1 H ot Bo x #11 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H l\ 

Serial No.: N/A £ 

Data received/placed In service: Pre 1995 t 

Aanulacturen Anderson NUTEC H 

>ena1 No.: N/A 

ate received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-OS C Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 69 247 Reference Temperatures 72 246 

Actual Temperatures 69 249 Actual Temperatures 71 249 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-21 0 •2 emp Difference (tol. = 1 -1 

Hot Bo x #2 Hot Bo x #12 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date recerved/placed In service: Pre 1995 

vlanufacturer. Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 15-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 68 249 Reference Temperatures 70 246 

Actual Temperatures 70 247 Actual Temperatures 71 247 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) -2 2 Temp Dttlorence (tol. = +-2) -1 -1 

Hot 8 OX #3 H ot Bo x #13 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed in sen/lea: Pre 1995 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 16-Fe b-06 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 69 244 Reference Temperatures 67 246 

Actual Temperatures 69 244 Actual Temperatures 67 246 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) 0 0 Temp Difference (tol. = -t-2) 0 0 

Hot B OX #4 Hot Bo x #14 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Dale received/placed In service: Pir* 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = *-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = *-2) 

Referenc 71 244 Reference Temperatures 68 247 e Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = *-2) 

71 243 (Actual Temperatures 70 247 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = *-2) 0 1 Temp Difference (lot, = +-2) -2 0 

Hot E ox #5 Hot Box #15 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1995 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

•ate received/placed In servfce: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 15-Feb-06 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. - *-2) 

Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. - *-2) 

66 251 Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Referenc 68 247 e Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. - *-2) 

66 252 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 66 247 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. - *-2) 0 •1 Temp Difference (loi. = +-2) 2 0 

H o U 3ox#6 Hot Bo x #16 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed tn sen/tee; Pre 1995 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed in service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 17-Feb-06 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = t-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = t-2) 

Referenc 69 245 Reference Temperatures 71 241 e Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = t-2) 

70 245 Actual Temperatures 69 241 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (to). = t-2) -1 0 Temp Difference (tol. = -t-2) 2 0 

Hot BOX #7 Hot Bo x #17 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service; Pre 1995 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) 

71 246 Reference Temperatures 69 245 Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) 

71 250 Actual Temperatures 70 247 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) 0 -2 Temp DWerence (tol. = +-2) -1 -2 

Hot Box #8 Hot BOX #18 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date recefved/piaced In service: Pre 199"5 

Manufacturer Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In servce: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-G6 Calibration Date: 15-Feb-06 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference {tol. = +-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference {tol. = +-2) 

Referenc 70 244- Reference Temperatures 72 247 e Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference {tol. = +-2) 

71 246 Actual Temperatures 70 248 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference {tol. = +-2) •1 -2 Temp Difference (tol. = -t-2) 2 -1 

Hot Bo x #9 Hot Bo x #19 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date recerved'olaced In service: Pre 199S _ 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

•ate recarvBd/placed in service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 16-Feb-06 Calibration Date: 16-Feb-08 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference flol. = +-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference flol. = +-2) 

69 249 Reference Temperatures 70 244 Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference flol. = +-2) 

70 251 Actual Temperatures 71 244 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Difference flol. = +-2) -1 -2 Temp Difference (tol. = +-2) -1 0 

Hot 3ox #10 Hot Bo x #21 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Manufacturer: Anderson NUTEC H 

Serial No.: N/A 

Date received/placed In service: Pre 1995 

Calibration Date: 1&-Feb-05 Calibration Date: 17-Feb-OS 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Drfterence (tol. = +-2) 

Ambient Hot Ambient Hot 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Drfterence (tol. = +-2) 

Referenc 73 247 Reference Temperatures 68 241 e Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Drfterence (tol. = +-2) 

72 246 Actual Temperatures 69 243 

Reference Temperatures 

Actual Temperatures 

Temp Drfterence (tol. = +-2) 1 1 Tamp Difference {tol. = +-2] -1 -2 
ENS R AECO M 

XAD Thermocouple Calibrations - 2006 

date 3/13/2006 

BP: 29.1 

Reference Thermometer ID#: 

Manufacture: 

Date placed in Service: 

Calibrator: James Ruckdeschel 

Ambient Temp (F): 63 

Fluke Digital RTD 2131035 

Fluke 

Pre 1980 

Ice Bath Ambient 

Thermocouple 

ID# 

Reference 

Temp 

XAD 

Temp 

Temp 

Difference 

Tol = +- 2 F 

Reference 

Temp 

XAD 

Temp 

Temp 

Difference 

Tol = +- 2 F 

XAD-1 33 32 -1 62 62 0 

XAD-2 33 33 0 62 63 1 

XAD-3 33 31 -2 62 62 0 

XAD-4 31 31 0 63 63 0 

XAD-5 31 33 2 63 63 0 

XAD-6 32 32 0 63 63 0 

XAD-7 32 32 0 64 64 0 

XAD-8 32 32 0 65 63 -2 

XAD-9 0 0 

XAD-10 32 32 0 66 64 -2 

XAD-11 0 0 

XAD-12 0 0 
ENSR 

Appendix D 

Stack Configuration, Sampling Port and Traverse Point Locations 

S:V_JOB\2006\Onyx\Performance Test\Report\Onyx 2006 

Test Report.doc 

September 2006 
GROUN D LEVE L 

TEST PORTS 

32' 

FLO W 

ENSR AECOM 

ENSR CORPORATION 

6601 Klrkvllla Rood 

East SyraeuM. Nsw York 13057 

PHONE: (315 ) 432-050 6 

FAX: (315 ) 437-050 9 

WEB: HTTP://WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM 

FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS 

Sauget, Illinois 

FIGURE NUHnb 

ENSR AECOM 

ENSR CORPORATION 

6601 Klrkvllla Rood 

East SyraeuM. Nsw York 13057 

PHONE: (315 ) 432-050 6 

FAX: (315 ) 437-050 9 

WEB: HTTP://WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM 

FIXED HEARTH INCINERATOR UNIT 3 

VEOLIA ES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS 

Sauget, Illinois 

1 

ENSR AECOM 

ENSR CORPORATION 

6601 Klrkvllla Rood 

East SyraeuM. Nsw York 13057 

PHONE: (315 ) 432-050 6 

FAX: (315 ) 437-050 9 

WEB: HTTP://WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM 

DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: PROJECT NUMBER: DRAWIMO NUMBER: 

ENSR AECOM 

ENSR CORPORATION 

6601 Klrkvllla Rood 

East SyraeuM. Nsw York 13057 

PHONE: (315 ) 432-050 6 

FAX: (315 ) 437-050 9 

WEB: HTTP://WWW.ENSR.AECOM.COM LLM WW 9/11/0 6 10002-01 7 1 OF 1 
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

(Particulate Traverse - Circular Stack) 

FACILTY: Onyx Environmental Services 

STACK IDENTIFICATION: Unit 3 

STACK DIAMETER: 39 inches 

SAMPLING LOCATIONS: 14.95 diameters downstream 

9.85 diameters upstream 

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS 

AS SPECIFIED BY EPA METHOD 1: 16 

NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS SAMPLED: 16 

Traverse Point Percent of Stack Diameter 

Number From Inside Wall 

Distance in Inches 

From Inside Wall* 

1 3.2 1.2 

2 10.5 4.1 

3 19.4 7.6 

4 32.3 12.6 

5 67.7 26.4 

6 80.6 31.4 

7 89.5 34.9 

8 96.8 37.8 

* For stacks with an inside diameter (ID) of 24 inches or less, no traverse point may be located within 

0.5 inches of the inside wall. For stacks with an ID greater than 24 inches, no traverse point may be 

located within 1.0 inches of the inside wall. Any point not meeting the criteria shall be adjusted. 
ENS R 

Appendix E 

Laboratory Data 

S:\JOB\2006\Onyx\Performance Test\Report\Onyx 2006 

Test Report.doc 

September 2006 
ENS R AECO M 

ENS R Ai r Toxic s TS P Laborator y 

Analytica l Repor t 

Client : Jeff Gorma n 

ENS R 

6601 Kirkville Road 

E. Syracuse, N Y 13057 

Laborator y ID: 06-067 

Client ID : 10002-017 

Date Received : 5/12/06 

All work contained in tMs report has been done in accordance with laboratory standard operating procedures. ENSR's Air 

Toxics TSP Laboratory follows methodologies based upon standard EPA/NIOSH/OSHA Methods. Data contained herein 

should be considered accurate and complete to the best of our knowledge. This report cannot be duphcated in part without 

the written permission of ENSR. ; 

Arthur Carpenito / Date 

Laboratory Analyst 

ENSR Air Toxics TSP Laboratory 

NYSDOH / NELAC # 11631 

page 1 of 6 
ENSR 

Method 5 Exposed Filter Data Sheet 

Balance Used: 

Project Manager: 

Project Name: 

Project Number: 

Analysis Mathod: 

Jeff Gorman 

Onyx 

10002-017 

Start Friday 05/12/06 16:34 45 72 AC 

Wt. 1 Monday 05/15/06 15.30 36 72 AC 

Wt.2 Tuesday 05/16/06 9:28 37 72 AC 

Wt. 3 

Wt. 4 

. Filter* Run Dlla 

ly'' *i< W i 

' "IVr , V ^ 1 « Wt 

•tes t 

204 01/09/06 0.4093 G3832 N/A LAB FILTER BLANK 90 mm 0.4092 0.4094 0.0002 ok by Wt. 0.4093 0,0003 

204 01/09/06 0.4067 G3825 05/09/06 PRETEST-M5-FILTER 90 mm 0.4101 0.4102 0.0001 ok by Wt, 0.4102 0.0035 

204 01/09/06 0.4057 G3827 05/10/06 U3-M5-F-R1 90 mm 0.4086 0.4088 0.0002 ok by Wl. 0.4087 0.0030 

204 01/09/08 0.4054 G3824 05/10/06 U3-M5-F-R2 90 mm 0.4136 0.4134 0.0002 ok by Wt. 0.4135 0.0081 

03 204 :01/09/06 0.4054 G3828 05/11/06 U3-M5-F-R3 90 mm 0.4126 0.4124 0.0002 ok by Wl. 0.4125 0.0071 

CO 

CD 

w 

o 

Eillor Typo: iSiJJgfei' Teflon Quartz 

1. Delta Weight tolerance +/-0.0005Q of total weightless tare weight between two consecutive weightings or average weight. 

2. Fillers must be weighed wilii (ha proper conditions (RH = 25-50 % and RT = 50-78 deg f) 

3. Fillers must be properly conditioned (24 hour desiccation: Further Conditioning > 6 hours). 

4. Conditioning for oven method, Oven driod at 105 deg c fo 2-3 hours; Further conditioning > 6 hours. 

5. Total grams below or equal to .0005 (I.DL) is presented as .0003. 
ENSR j M 

Method 5 Front Half Acetone Probe Rinse Data Sheet 

Je(t Gorman 

Balance Used: Mettler 3 

Project Manager: 

Project Name: 

Project Number: 

Analysis Method: 

Onyx 

10002-017 

•RE M 

Start Tuesday 05/16/06 15:40 44 72 AC 

Wt. 1 Wednesday 05/17/08 17:06 41 71 AC 

Wt. 2 Thursday 05/18/06 8:47 47 69 AC 

Wl. 3 Thursday 05/18/06 14:48 40 73 AC 

Wt. 4 

OA Slveaf, 

....EM*.*'. wssm&missm • ©-Smile M . 

;tsiwt . 

i I l ^*'* ,

t $ 

434 06/11/06 115.1668 32 N/A LAB ACETONE BLANK 50 115.1688 115.1678 0.0008 115.1678 0,0000 ok by Wt. 115.1678 0.0010 

434 05/11/06 B6.2956 39 05/09/06 PRETEST-M5-ACETONE 52 50 86.2992 66.2988 0.0004 ok by Wt. 86.2890 0.0034 

434 05/11/06 103.5347 64 05/10/06 U3-MS-AR-R1 63 50 103.5381 103,5377 0.0006 103.5378 0.0001 ok by Wt. 103.5378 0.0031 

434 05/11/06 101.0475 120 05/10/06 U3-M5-AR-R2 111 50 101.0542 101.0540 0.O002 ok by Wt. 101.0541 0.0066 

434 05/11/06 105.3632 154 05/11/06 U3-M5-AR-R3 95 50 105.3691 105.3689 0.0002 ok byWt. 105.3690 0.0058 

CO 

(Q 

<D 

O 

—H 

O 

Acetone Manufacturer/Lot No.: Rsher/052584__ 

Acetonq Rinse = 25 mis twico - (SO nils tolal) 

1. Delia Weighl tolerance +/- 0.0005g of tolal weighl less lare weight between two consecutive weightings or average weight. 

2. Beakers must bo weighed with Ino proper conditions {RH = 25-50 % and RT = 59-78 deg 0 

3. Beakers must bo property conditioned (24 hour desiccation; Further Conditioning > 6 hours), 

4. Natural Evaporation Mothod = Evaporate to drynoss at room temperature under a hood / watch glass cover 

5. Heat Appiicalion = Under a hood and watch glass over sample, apply heat below (he boiling point of sample until evaporated to 25 mis; then follow slep 4 (above) for remaining portion. 

0. Total grams below or equal lo .0005 (LDL) is presented as .0003. 
PROJECT NARRATIV E 

Maxxam Analytics (Bariragton ON) 

Maxxam; Job #: A644469 

Client: ENS R International 

Qient Project: 10002-017-017 ONYX 

L SAMPL E RECEIPT/ANALYSIS 

a) Sample Listing 

Maxxam Client Date Date Date Date 

ID Sampie ID Sampled Received Propped Run 

Mercury IB via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/18 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/18 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/18 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06705/18 

Mercury 2B via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/16 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/16 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/16 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/16 

Mercury 3A via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99830 U3-M29TR2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06705/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

Mercury 3B via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/15 06/05/16 

Mercury 3C via EPA Method 29 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/18 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/18 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/18 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/16 06/05/18 

Metals in Ab (Combined) via EPA Method 29 (ICP/MS) 

L99828 U3-M29-RB 06/05/10 06705/12 06/05/17 06/05/19 

L99829 U3-M29-R1 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/19 

L99830 U3-M29-R2 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/19 

L99831 U3-M29-R3 06/05/10 06/05/12 06/05/17 06/05/19 

Run Date is de&ned as the date of injection of the last calibration standard (12 hours or less) 

prior to tlie samples analyzed within that ran sequence. Therefore the time of calibration 

injectioa that defines the nm date is always within 12 hours of the time of sample injection. 

b) Shipping Problems: none encountered 

c) Documentation Problems: none encountered 

JH Page 1 of 2 
a SAMPL E PREP : 

No problems encountered 

ffl. SAMPL E ANALYSIS: 

See also comments within tlie appropriate Certificate of Analysis 

a) Hold Times: all within recommended hold times 

b) Instrument Calibration: all within control limits 

c) Quality Control: Al l applicable QC meets control criteria, except where otherwise noted. 

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the 

contract, both technically and for other than the conditions detailed above. 

In addition, I certify, that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the data as reported are 

true and accurate. Release of the data contained in mis data package has been authorized by 

ths cognizant laboratory official or his/her designee, as verified by this signature. 

Mary-AnneTS 

JH Page 2 of 2 
2 . DAT A SUMMAR Y 

- Certificat e o f Analysi s -

Sample analyte result 

Method blank result 

LCS Results with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike data with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike Duplicate data with % Recoveries 

Surrogate recoveries 
Driven by service and Science 

Your Project*: 10002-017-017 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601KirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

MAXXAM JOB #: A644469 

Received: 2006/05/12,12:00 

Sample Matrix: Filter 

# Samples Received: 4 

Date Date Method 

Analyses ; Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

Mercury IB -Air (Filtcr+Acetone) by CVA A Q 4 2006/05/17 2006705/18 SOP ING 111 . EPA CFR PTM 29 

Metals in Air (Combined) by ICP/MS© 4 2006/05/17 2006705/19 SOP ING 108/109 EPA 5W846-6020 

Sample Matrix: Impinger Solution 

# Samples Received: 4 

Analyses 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinger) by CVAA Q 4 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) by CVAA $ 4 

Mercury 2B in Air(HN03/H202 Imp) by CVAA 0 4 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) by CVAA© 4 

Date Date Method 

Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

2006/05/16 2006705/18 SOP ING 111 EPA CFR PTM 29 

2006/05/15 2006/05/16 SOP ING 111 EPA CFR PTM 29 

2006/05/16 2006/05/16 SOP ING 111 EPA CFR PTM 29 

2006/05/15 2006705/16 SOP ING 111 EPA CFR PTM 29 

Quantity 

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Burlington 

Jl 

Pagel of 11 

6740 Campobello Road. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
*r'\ Driven by service and Science 

£ 1 5^5^ SI IT"1 - •— — " ^vww.ma3CXffliaai»alytf«-« 4'

m 

Your Projects: 10002-017-017 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: -Teff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601KirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

f-F.RTIFICATF. OF ANALYSIS 

-2-

Valldated by: 

Total cover pages: 2 

Page2oM 1 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 
Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

Driven by service and Science 

www.makxa maiialytlcs.com 

ENSR International 

Client Project fr. 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

MERCURY BY COLD VAPOUR AA (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID L99828 L99829 L99829 L99830 L99831 

Sampling Date 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 2006705/10 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 

Units U3-M29-RB U3-M2&-R1 U3-M29-R1 

Lab-Dup 

U3-M29-R2 U3-M29-R3 RDL OC Batch MDL 

Total Mercury-1 B "9 . ND ND ND 0.10 0.27 0.03 972395 0.03 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

Page 3 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6268 Fax:905-817-5777 
I V I £ 1 

l^^SAnalytics irtc 

Drh'en by s&n>ice and Science 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID L99828 L99829 L99829 L99830 L99831 

Sampling Date 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 

Units U3-M29-RB U3-M29-R1 U3-M29-R1 

Lab-Dup 

U3-M29-R2 U3-M29-R3 RDL 3C Batch MOL 

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.76 9.29 9.62 249 946 0.40. 972012 0.40 

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 972012 0.10 

Total Cadmium (Cd) ug 0.34 0.68 0.71 1.38 2.76 0.10 972012 0.10 

Total Chromium (Cr) u g ^ 1.01 17.7 19.8 29.0 55.8 0.3Q 972012 0.30 

Totai Lead (Pb) ug 2.70 23.9 24.1 22.3 40.6 0.20 972012 0.20 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

Page 4 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
M a x yc 3 r n 

f Analytics 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

Driven by service and Science 

vro-w.maxxamanalytics.coin 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

MERCURY BY COLD VAPOUR AA (IMPINGER SOLUTION) 

Maxxam ID L99828 L99829 L99829 

Sampling Date 2005705/10 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 

Units U3-M29-RB RDL U3-M29-R1 U3-M29-R1 

Lab-Dup 

RDL E2C Batch MDL 

Total Mercury-2B ug ND 0.3 74.7 75.4 1.6 970091 0.01 

Total Mercury-3A ug ND 0.01 3.38 3 40 0.13 970045 0.05 

Total Mercury-3B ug 0.04 0.02 10.7 10.7 0.5 970066 0.05 

Total Mercury-3C ug ND 0.05 8.55 8.58 0.25 971322 0.05 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

QC Batch = Quality Control Batch 

u I • n.oz 

Maxxam ID L99830 L99831 I 

Sampling Date 2006/05/10 2006/05/10 I 

Units U3-M29-R2 RDL U3-WI29-R3 RDL 3C Batch MDL 

Total Mercury-2B ug 104 1.7 78.6 1.5 970091 0.01 

Total Mercury-3A ug 1.29 0.02 1.26 0.02 970045 0.05 

Total Metcuty-3B ug 7.99 0.25 1.56 0.05 970066 0.05 

Total Mercuiy-3C ug 7.95 0.25 7.70 0.25 971322 0.05 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

Page 5 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel; 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
Driven by service and Science 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

L99828 

U3-M29-RB 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/05/10 

2006/05/12 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinqer) by CVA A CVAA 971322 2006/05/16 2006/05/18 FFS 

Mercury. 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVA A CVAA 970045 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 • FFS 

Mercury 28 in Air(HN03/H202 Imp) bv CV A CVAA 970091 2006/05/16 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) bv CV A CVA A 970066 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury 1B -Air (Filter+Acetone) bv CVA A CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006/05/18 F FS 

Metals in A r (Combined) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012 2006/05/17 2006/05/19 N R 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

L99829 

U3-M29-R1 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/05/10 

2006/05/12 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinger) by CVA A CVAA 971.322 2006/05/16 2006705/18 FFS 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVA A CVAA 970045 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 ' FFS 

Mercury 2B in Air(HN03/H202 Imp) bv CV A CVAA 970091 2006/05/16 2006705/16 FFS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) bv CV A CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 F FS • 

Mercury 1B -Air (Filter+Acetone) bv CVA A CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006/05/18 v.. 

F FS 

Metals in Air (Combined) bv ICP/MS ICP 1/MS 972012 2006/05/17 2006/05/19 N R 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

L99629Dup 

U3-M29-R1 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/05/10 

2006/05/12 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinger) by CVAA CVAA 971322 2006/05/16 2006/05/18 F FS 

Mercury 3A In Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVAA CVAA 970045 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 • FFS 

Mercury 2B in AMHN03/H2C-2 Imp) bv CV A CVAA 970091 2006/05/16 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) bv CV A CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 ' FFS 

Mercury 1B -Air (Filter+Acetone) by CVA A CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006/05/18 FFS 

Metals in Air (Combined) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012 2006/05/17 2006/05/19 N R 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

L99830 

U3-M2S-R2 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/05710 

2006/05/12 

Test Description instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI impingerlpy CVA A CVA A - 971322 2006/05/16 2006/05/18 FFS 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) bv CVA A CVAA 970045 2006/05715 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 2B In AWHN03/H202 Imp) bv CVA CVAA 970091 2006/05/16 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2S04) bv CV A CVAA 970066 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 1B -Air (Filter+Acetone) bv CVAA CVAA 972395 2006/05/17 2006/05/18 F F S 

Metals in Air (Combined) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012 2006/05/17 2006/05/19 N R 

( Ar>Alytlcn I 0c 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05720 

Page 6 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
J>rivctt by service and Science 

vrtvw.niaxxamanolytlcs.coin 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID L99831 Collected 2006/05/10 

Sampie ID U3-M29-R3 Shipped 

Matrix Filter Received 2006705/12 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Mercury 3C in Air (HCI Impinqer) by CVA A CVA A 971322 2006/05/16 2006/05/18 F FS 

Mercury 3A in Air (HN03 Rinse) by CVA A CVA A 970045 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 FFS 

Mercury 2B in AMHNO3/H202 Imp) bv CV A CVA A 970091 2006/05/16 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 3B in Air (KMn04/H2SQ4) bv CV A CVA A 970066 - 2006/05/15 2006/05/16 F FS 

Mercury 1B -Air (Filter+Acetone) bv CVA A CVA A 972395 2006/05/17 2006/05/18 FFS 

Metals in Air (Combined) by .ICP/MS ICP1/MS 972012. 2006/05/17 2006/05/19 N R 

Page7of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 805-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 

Maxxam Job #:A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 
ENSR International 

Client Project 1k 10002-017-017 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Driven by: service and Scf enc*? 

Maxxam Job #:A644469 

Report Date: 2006/05/20 

GENERA L COMMENTS 

ICPMS: Post digestion duplicate and spike on sample L99829 

Results relate only to the items tested, . 

Page 8 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax. 905-817-5777 
Driven by service and Science 

ENSK International • www.1na22ramanniytic3.c01n 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

P.O. #: 

Project name: ONYX 

QA/Q C • 

Batch 

Num Init QCTvp e Parameter 

Date 

Analyzed 

ww/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units Q C Limits 

970045 FF S MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.00, RDL=0.13 102 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(L99829) Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.00, RDL=0.13 105 "9 85-115 

Spiked Blank - Total Mercuty-3A 2006/05/16 0.11, RDL=0.01 106 ug 90-110 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.11,RDL=0.01 107 ug 90-110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 ND, RDL=0.01 ug 

R PD Total Mercury-3A 2006/05/16 0.6 % 20 

970066 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 0.5, RDL=0.5 105 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D UP (L99829) Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 0.5, RDL=0.5 107 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 0.55, RDL=0.05 110 ug 90-110 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 0.54, RDL=0.05 108 ug 90-110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 ND, RDL=0.05 ug 

RPD Total Mercury-3B 2006/05/16 0.05 % 20 

970091 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 0.0,RDL=1.6 100 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D UP (L99829) Total Mercury-2B 2006/05716 0.0, RDL=1.6 95 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercuiy-2B 2006/05/16 0.11, RDL=0.01 107 ug 9 0 - 110 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 0.11, RDL=0.01 109 ug 9 0 - 110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 ND, RDL=0.01 ug 

R PD Total Mercury-2B 2006/05/16 0.9 % 20 

971322 FFS MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-3C 2006/05/18 0.54, RDL=0.25 108 ug 85-115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (L99829) Total Mercuiy-3C 2006/05/18 0.54, RDL=0.25 108 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercuiy-3C 2006/05/18 0.51, RDL=0.05 102 ug 90-110 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-3C 2006705/18 0.52, RDL=0.05 103 ug 90 -110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-3C 2006/05/18 ND, RDL=0.05 ug 

R P D Total Mercury-3C 2006/05/18 0.4 % 20 

972012 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Arsenic (As) 2006705/19 49.5, RDL=0.40 99 us 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (L99829) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 49.5, RDL=0.40 99 ug 70 -130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 44.5, RDL=0.10 89 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (L99829) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05719 45.5, RDL=0.10 91 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05/19 26.0, RDL=0.10 104 ug 70 -130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (L99829) Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05719 26.3, RDL=0.10 105 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 52.5, RDL=0.30 105 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D UP (L99829) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006705/19 51.5, RDL=0.30 103 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 50.5, RDL=0.20 101 ug 70-130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (L99829) Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 50.5, RDL=0.20 101 ug 70-130 

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 51.5, RDL=0.40 103 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 51.5, RDL=0.40 103 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 47.0. RDL=0.10 94 ug 85-115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 47.0, RDL=0.10 94 ug 85-115 

s v i si y^yLsi m 

I / An«lytlc» Ir 

Quality Assurance Report 

Maxxam Job Number. GA644469 

Page 9 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6268 Fax:905-817-5777 
£>riven by service and Science 

tNS R International www.niascxamanalytics.coin 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project #: 10002-017-017 

P.O. #: 

Project name: ONYX 

Quality Assurance Report (Continued) 

Maxxam Job Number GA644469 

QA/QC 

Batch 

Num Init QCTyp e Parameter 

Date 

Analyzed 

yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units Q C Limits 

972012 N_R Spiked Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05719 25.8, RDL=0.10 103 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006705/19 25.8, RDL=0.10 103 ug 85- 115 

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 53.0. RDL=0.30 106 "9 85- 115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 53.5. RDL=0.30 107 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05719 51.0, RDL=0.20 102 ug 85- 115 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05719 52.0, RDL=0.20 104 ug 85- 115 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank DUP -Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.10 . ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 ND. RDL=0.10 ug 

Method Blank Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05/19 ND, RDI=0.10 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.10 ug 

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006705/19 ND, RDL=0.30 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.30 • ug 

Method Blank Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug 

Method Blank DUP Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 ND, RDL=0.20 ug 

RPD Total Arsenic (As) 2006/05/19 3.5 % 20 

Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/05/19 N C % 20 

Totai Cadmium (Cd) 2006/05/19 3.9 % 20 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/05/19 11.2 % 20 

Total Lead (Pb) 2006/05/19 0.7 % 20 

972395 FFS • MATRIX SPIKE 

(L99829) Total Mercury-1B 2006/05/18 0.30, RDL=0.03 99 ug 85- 115 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP (L99829) Total Mercury-1 B 2006/05/18 0.30, RDL=0.03 100 ug 85- 115 

Spiked Blank Total Mercury-1 B 2006/05/18 0.31, RDL=0.03 103 ug 90- 110 

Spiked Blank DUP Total Mercury-1 B 2006/05/18 0.31,RDL=0.03 103 ug 90- 110 

Method Blank Total Mercury-1 B 2006/05/18 ND, RDL=0.03 ug 

RPD Total Mercury-1 B 2006/05/18 NC % 20 

ND = Not detected 

SSC = Non-calculable 

RPD = Relative Percent Difference 

SPIKE = Fortified sample 

M a X^ a m 

Page 10 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road. Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 
Dtiven by service and Science 

vrwvr.maxxa manalytlcs.com 

Validatio n Signatur e Pag e 

The analytical data and all QC contamed in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). 

FRANK MO, B.Sc, Inorganic Lab. Manager 

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have tbe required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of 

ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEAL have approved this reporting process and electronic report format 

f Annlytk J I r» c 

Maxxam Job #: A644469 

Page 11 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 
Section I: Sample Inventory Report 

Date Received: 

Project No.: 

Project Name: 

6/22/2006 

27803 

10002-017 

Lab. Sample ID Client Sample ID Component ID 

001 

002 

003 

004 

005 

006 

007 

U3-M23A-XAD-R1 

U3-M23A-PF-R1 

U3-M23A-XAD-R2 

U3-M23A-PF-R2 

U3-M23A-XAD-R3 

U3-M23A-PF-R3 

U3-M23A-XAD-FB 

BH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

XAD 

FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

XAD 

FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

XAD 

FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

BH/FH ACE/MeC12/TOL 

FILTER 

XAD 

Project 27803 

Smpinvgnmm5,rpt 

Project 2 of 466 
sectio n n 

Project27803 Project3 of 466 
Method Blank . .Method,0023A 

Matrix: MM5 QC Batch No.: 8120 Lab Sample: 0-MB001 

Sample Size: Sample Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-225: NA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC 

-u 

Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd

 Qualifiers 

2,3^>TCDD:: 0.879 IS 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 93.8 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 0.802 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 88.8 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.69 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 85.3 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.43 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 77.3 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 1.55 13C-OCDD 59.8 40-135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1.82 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 82.1 40- 135 

OCDD :

 :ND 6.95 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 77.9 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.08 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 95.9 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDFi 1.45 - 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ; 79.6 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.33 13C-OCDF 23.2 40- 135 H 

l^a^^HxCD F ND 0.587 ; PS 37Ci-2,3,7,8-TCDD 101 70-130

 v 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.469 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 99.6 70-130 

2,3,4i6,7i8-HxCpF ND 0.552 ; 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 95.2 70-130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.707 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 88.0 70-130 

l^^^.S-HpCD F : 0.386 ,• J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF: - 73.1. 70- 1.30, 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.846 AS 13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 83.3 40-135 

OCDF ND 7.46 \ 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data 

e 

Total TCDD ND 0.879 TEQ (Min-Max): 0.00386 - 2.87 

TotalPeCDD •'-'ND 0.669 

Total HxCDD ND 1.55 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD: ; :;ND \ . 1.82 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF ND 1.08 c. Method detection limit. 

TotaiyPeCDF ; NDy- 1.39 7 d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF ND 0.566 e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Totai HpCDF 0.386 

Analyst-. j^ g Approved By: William J . Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 4 of 466 
O P R Results Method 0023A 

Matrix: MM5 QC Batch No.: 8120 Lab Sample: 0-OPR001 

Sample Size: Sample Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB- 5 : 26-Jun-06 Date Analyzed DB-225: NA 

Analyte Spike Cone. Cone. (ng/mL) OPR Limits Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 2.50 2.48 1.75-3.25 IS 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 84.5 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 12.5 12.6 8.75 -16.25 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 82.3 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 12.5 12.8 8.75 - 16.25 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 79.1 40- 135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 12.5 14.0 8.75 -16.25 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 77.4 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 12.5 14 0 8.75 - 16.25 13C-OCDD 62.9 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 12.5 12.0 8.75-16.25 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 78.1 40- 135 

OCDD 25.0 • 24.7 \ 17.5-32.5 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 75.4 40 - 135 : : 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 2.50 2.40 1.75-3.25 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 83.5 40-135 

l,2,3,7,8irPeCDF, :

 J

; 

. 7 /K 12.5 ; 12.5 : 8.75 - 16.25 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 78 7 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 12.5 11.8 8.75-16.25 13C-OCDF 27.2 40-135 

1,2,3,4 j, 8 . H^Cr)F, v 12.5 12.3 8.75- 16.25 ; AS 13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-1 IxCDl 90.7 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 12.5 13.9 8.75 -16.25 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 13.6 8.75-16,25 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 12.5 12.9 8.75 -16.25 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 12.5 12.8 8,75 -16.25 , 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 12.5 8.92 8.75 - 16.25 

OCDF 25.0 24.7 17,5-32.5 : 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 5 of 466 
Sample ID: U3-M2 3 A-XAD--R 1 • Method 0023 A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 19-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-001 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jutl-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Dates Analyzed DB-225 : 27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 7 ND 3.64 IS 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 91.6 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 17.0 J 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 88.7 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD :

 19.1 . J 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 89.2 V 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 46.1 J 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 96.7 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCPD; 37.0 . J 13C-OCDD. 105 . 40 - 135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 190 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 88.3 40-135 

OCDD ^ 236 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 80.4 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 29.5 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 97.0 40-135 

l,2,3;7,8-PeCDF r: I 35.5 J 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 92.7 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 65.4 13C-OCDF 83.4 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 36.0 ":. i " PJ 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD 86.1 70 - 130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 31.9 J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 91.4 70-130 

2;3i4;6,7,8-HxCPF • 43.8 . J ' 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD • J: 85.7 70-: 130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 10.3 J 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 85.9 70-130 

1,2,3,4X7,8-HRCDF 78.1 B 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 77.9 ,70-130; . 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 8.10 J AS 13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 95.2 40- 135 

OCDF

 :" 20.4 J 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 1180 TEQ (Min-Max): 71.4 - 75.0 

Total PeCDD 869 ; 

Total HxCDD 1470 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 412 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF 1080 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF 800 D d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF 391 395 D e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 112

 :' B 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J . Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Proiect 27803 Project 6 of 466 
SamplelD: U3-M23A-PF-R1 Method 0023A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 19-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-002 

Q C Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Date Analyzed DB-225: 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 7^:: - ND 1.18 IS :;i3C-2,3,7,8-TCDD: ,\ 91.5 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1.38 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 92.8 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCtlD ' ••'ND-; -•: 2.76 >:: 13C-l,2,3,6;7,8-HxCDD ; 89.4 40-135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.33 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83.1 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD :.' ND 2.53 13C-OCDD 86.7 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 2.52 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 85.3 40-135 

OCDD 10.8 J 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 82.3 40 - 135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.27 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 97.8 40 - 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF :.ND,..... 1.51 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ^ 80.9 40- 135 . 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.38 13C-OCDF 69.1 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.923 ES; 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD i : 94.4 70 -130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.737 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 93.9 70- 130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.868 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 90.7 ;:70>:i30 :• 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 1.11 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 87.4 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF "ND 1.29 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-1 lpCDF 79.0 70-130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 1.11 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 93.7 40-135 

OCDF ::'NDv 5.02 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 c 

Total TCDD ND 1.18 TEQ (Min-Max): 0.0108 - 3.95 

Total PeCPD 7ND:,;: A 1-38 

Total HxCDD ND 3.34 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD 1.77 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF ND 1.27 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF: ;/ ; 7 ii44 - d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF ND 0.890 e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF ; NI) 1.49 :" 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 7 of 466 
SamplelD: TJ3-M23A-XAD-R2 Method 0023A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-003 

Q C Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Dates Analyzed DB-225: 27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD :;; : 3.44 .V J IS; 13a2,3,7;8-TCDD 90.7 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 17.6 J 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 96.2 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ; 16.8 J 13e-J,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ; 90.0 ;;40--135 : • 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34.7 J 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 89.1 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCpb 27.1 J "• 13C-OCDD 88.8 40-135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 175 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 84.8 40- 135 

OCDD 175 i :i3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 91.8 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 32.8 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 96.2 40-135 

U^^PeCDF / : 41.2 • J 13C- 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 83.0 •

;

;;.40;-;i35-:-

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 70.2 13C-OCDF 59.8 40-135 

1,2i3,4,7,8-HxCDF 33.0: •'•>'"' J ES 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD : 99.4 70-130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 31.7 J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 89.2 70- 130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ,; . 41.8 J 130-1,2,3,4,7,8^x000 92.3 • 70- 130 ; 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 11.6 J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 92.3 70- 130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF: 66.8 B 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 83,2 70- 130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 5.21 J AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 99.2 40- 135 

OCDF • 14.8 J 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 1210 TEQ (Min-Max): 75.0 - 75.0 

TotalPeCDD : ; 848 

Total HxCDD 1330 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD ,.•'381' b, Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF 1350 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF 862 D d. Lower control limit - upper conlrol limit. 

Total HxCDF 390 D e. TE Q based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 9870 . B 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 8 of 466 
SamplelD: U3-M23A-PF-R2 Method 0023A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-004 

Q C Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Date Analyzed DB-225: N A 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

1.21 . IS13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 95.2 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 3.26 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 101 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDP ;i- hNp;;''" 2.63 13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 94.3 40- 135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.23 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 83.0 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND ; 2.41 13C-OCDD 88.2 40-135 ..; 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 4.12 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 92.6 40-135 

OCDD :

:

:;ND- . 6.33 DC-i^SJ^-PeCDF 88.9 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.951 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 101 40-135 

l,2,3i7iB-PeCDF

 : •'' NP,:' ; • 3:44 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 79.5 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 3.14 13C-OCDF 61.5 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND : 0:684 ; w ES 37C1T2,3,7,8-TCDD 97.5 70-130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.546 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 99.4 70- 130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCPF" ; 'Npr:

:r

v

--, 0,643 • 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 95.0 70-130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.823 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 88.7 70- 130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF :

 ND 0.705 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 79.4 70- 130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.971 AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 92.8 40-135 

OCDF :

^ND ;- 6.38 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD ND 1.21 TEQ (Min-Max): 0-5.74 

"TatalP ^CDP^ :: ND 3.26 

Total HxCDD ND 2.41 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

TotalHpCDD ND 4.12 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF ND 0.951 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF ND 3 28 d. Lower control limit: upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF ND 0.660 e. TE Q based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

total HpCDF ND 0.817 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 9 of 466 
Sample^i;.-\-:^3-ya3A'XA^-^t3- Method 0023 A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 21 -Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-005 

Q C Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Dates Analyzed DB-225: 27-Jun-06 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCLd

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 7

:ND;. > , 3.92 I§ 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 88.3 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 16.7 J 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 94.0 40- 135 

l,2,3;4,7i8rHxCDE> 14.6: ''••V.'J.:

7'-

13C-l,2,3;6,7,8-HxCDD 89.7 40- 135-7'. 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 35.7 J 13C- 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 95.2 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-1 IxCDD 26.3 • 'J"'':

. 

13C-OCDD 95.9 40-135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 156 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 86.6 40- 135 

OCDD 141 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 84.3 40- 135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 31.8 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 95.9 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 41.1 J 13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF : r 90.8 40-135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 76.2 13C-OCDF 81.0 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCPF 37.8 7"-'J7/ £S 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD : 98.2 70- 130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 33.6 J,D 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 97.8 70- 130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 44.9

 ; J 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 92.9 70- 130 77 7 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 11.1 J 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 90.7 70-130 

i,2,3y4,6,7,8-HpCDF 70.7 B 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDl; 92.5 70- 130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 7.15 J AS 13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 91.1 40- 135 

OCDF 13.2 j

;

- 7 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD 879 899 TEQ (Min-Max): 74.6 - 78.5 

Total PeCDD .\-686:

7

:;' 

Total HxCDD 1110 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD '335 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration. 

Total TCDF 1310 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF > ' 7948 ': D d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF 410 D e. TE Q based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF 102 ' B 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 10 of 466 
Sample ID- '• ;; i7U3-M23A-PF-R3 : Metho;d:

0.023A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 21-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-006 

QC Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 27-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Date Analyzed DB-225: NA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.40 IS 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 88 4 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 3.83 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 93.9 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.13 13C- 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD . 92.5 40- 135 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.81 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 95.6 40- 135 

] ,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD • I ND -

1,96 13C-OCDD 94.0 40- 135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 2.53 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 89.7 40- 135 

OCDD 'j;:lp\l,;. 

']. 13C-J,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 84.1 40-135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.15 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 99.3 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PcCDF ND 3.00 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7.8-1 IpCDI' 97.3 40- 135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.74 13C-OCDF 85.9 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ; : r 0.641 ^ 3701-2,3,7,8^000 100 70- 130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.512 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 104 70-130 

:i3l4,6,7,;8-HxCPF 0.603 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 94.3 70- 130 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.771 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 90.4 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 0.819 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpeDF 91.8 70-130 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.602 AS J3C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 99.0 40-135 

OCDF ND 3.84 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD ND 1.40 TEQ (Min-Max): 0.0101 - 5.85 

Total PeCPD : ;NP 3.83 

Total HxCDD 3.35 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD ,,ND::,.7\::;

' i- 2.53 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration, i 

Total TCDF ND 1.15 c. Method detection limit. 

Total PeCDF ; - : ;ND 2.86

 ;; d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF ND 0.618 e. TEQ based on (1989) International Toxic Equivalent Factors (ITEF). 

TotalT$CDF/ ;/ ND ' 0,950 V ; 

Analyst: RAS Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 11 of 466 
SamplelD: U3-M23A-XAD--FB Method 0023A 

Client Data Sample Data Laboratory Data 

Name: ENSR 

Project: 10002-017 

Date Collected: 20-Jun-06 

Time Collected: 

Matrix: 

Sample Size: 

MM5 

Sample 

Lab Sample: 27803-007 

Q C Batch No.: 8120 

Date Analyzed DB-5: 26-Jun-06 

Date Received: 22-Jun-06 

Date Extracted: 22-Jun-06 

Date Analyzed DB-225: ]\JA 

Analyte Cone. (pg/Sample) DL

 a EMPC b Qualifiers Labeled Standard %R LCL-UCL d

 Qualifiers 

2,3,7,8-TCDD ; :• • ND. 0.845 IS , 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 88.4 40-135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 0.844 13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 89.2 40-135 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.38 13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD i 93.7 ,\40-:i35.'!

^ 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.16 13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 80.2 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD,, ND 1.26 13C-.QCDD 84.5 ;40;-,135 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1.42 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 85.9 40-135 

OCDD ND 4 29.; 13G-l,2,3;7,8-PeCDF 81.7 40- 135 

2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.732 13C-i;2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 96.2 40- 135 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF :-. ND ";. 1.15 I3C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 81.1 40- 135 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.05 13C-OCDF 59.9 40- 135 

, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF : 0.401 E§ 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCPD 95.3 70- 130 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.320 13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 96.5 70-130 

2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF •;.Nb: 7 0.377;: 13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 88.0 70- 130 ,:] • ' 

1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.483 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 90.4 70-130 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 0.666 13C^,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF :

 76.2 .70 K130 • 

1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.918 AS 13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 90.6 40-135 

OCDF ND 3.70 

Totals Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) Data

 e 

Total TCDD ND 0.845 TEQ (Min-Max): 0-2.50 

TotaiPeCDD ND 0.844 

Total HxCDD ND 1.26 a. Sample specific estimated detection limit. 

Total HpCDD ND 1.42 b. Estimated maximum possible concentration, 

Total TCDF ND 0.732 c. Method detection, limit. 

Total PeCDF ND 1.10 : d. Lower control limit - upper control limit. 

Total HxCDF ND 0.387 e. TE Q based on (1989) International Toxic Equivs lent Factors (ITEF). 

Total HpCDF ND 0.772 

Analyst: Approved By: William J. Luksemburg 27-Jun-2006 15:11 

Project 27803 Project 12 of 466 
PROJECT NARRATIVE 

Maxxam Analytics (Burlington ON) 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Client: ENSR International 

Client Project: 10002-017-820 ONYX 

I. SAMPLE RECEIPT/ANALYSIS 

a) Sample Listing 

Maxxam Client Date Date Date Date 

ID SamplelD Sampled Received Prepped Run 

Metals in Air (Back Half) via EPA Method 29 

M73146 M29-RBBH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 

M73147 M29-U3-R1BH 2006/06/19 2006/06/22 2006/06729 2006/06/29 

M73147 Dup M29-U3-R1 BH 2006/06719 2006/06/22 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 

M73148 M29-U3-R2BH 2006/06/20 2006/06/22 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 

M73149 M29-U3-R3 BH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 

Metals in Air (Front Half) via EPA Method 29 

M73142 M29-RB FH 2006/06/21 2006706/22 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 

M73143 M29-U3-R1 FH 2006/06/19 2006/06/22 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 

M73143 Dup M29-U3-R1 FH 2006/06/19 2006/06/22 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 

M73144 M29-U3-R2 FH 2006/06/20 2006/06/22 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 

M73145 M29-U3-R3 FH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) via EPA Method 5 

M73142 M29-RBFH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/27 2006706/28 

M73143 M29-U3-R1 FH 2006/06/19 2006/06/22 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 

M73144 M29-U3-R2 FH 2006/06/20 2006/06/22 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 

M73145 M29-U3-R3 FH 2006/06/21 2006706/22 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 

Particulates in Air (Filter) via EPA Method 5 

M73142 M29-RBFH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 

M73143 M29-U3-R1FH 2006/06/19 2006/06/22 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 

M73144 M29-U3-R2FH 2006/06/20 2006/06722 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 

M73145 M29-U3-R3 FH 2006/06/21 2006/06/22 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 

Run Date is defined as the date of injection of the last calibration standard (12 hours or less) prior to 

the samples analyzed within that run sequence. Therefore the time of calibration injection that defines 

the run date is always within 12 hours of the time of sample injection. 

b) Shipping Problems: none encountered 

c) Documentation Problems: none encountered 

n. SAMPLE PREP: . 

No problems encountered 
ILL SAMPLE ANALYSIS: 

See also comments within the appropriate Certificate of Analysis 

a) Hold Times: all within recommended hold times 

b) Instrument Calibration: all within control limits 

c) Quality Control: All applicable QC meets control criteria, except where otherwise noted. 

I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and conditions ofthe contract, both 

technically and for other than the conditions detailed above. 

In addition, I certify, that to the best of my. knowledge and belief, the data as reported are true and 

accurate. Release ofthe data contained in this data package has been authorized by the cognizant 

laboratory official or his/her designee, as verified by this signature. 

Mary-Anne Johnson, Project Manager Date 

JUL OS 2006 

r 
2. DATA SUMMARY 

- Certificate of Analysis -

Sample analyte result 

Method blank result 

LCS Results with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike data with % Recoveries 

Matrix Spike Duplicate data with % Recoveries 

Surrogate recoveries 
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 

Client 

Lab number Issued 

1 

f 

i I Supplier P/N Lot# 

I 

1 90mm 

Filter Dimensions 

1 

I Date of Dessication (yyyyrnmdd hh:mm) 

iliSIi l 

as 

Filter pre weight average 

p o 

Weight of filter before (g) #1 

I 

\ Initial Date weighed (yyyymmdd hh:rnm) 

Weight of filter before (g) #2 I 1 1 Weight of filter before (g) #2 

I 

§ 

Final Date weighed (yyyymmdd hh:mm) 

% § • % Acceptability 

Weighl of filter difference 

Initial Temperature (14.4 to 25.6 C) 

Initial Humidity (%) 

| 0000 0 | 

Initial Balance Zero 

r 0.3000 1 

Initial 0.3000 grams 

(O 

o 

£». 

Final Temp (14.4 to 25.6 <3 deg change) 

Final Humidity (%) (<5 % change) 

ro Change in Temperature (C) 

o Change in Humidity (%) 

Final Balance Zero 

1 Final 0.3000 grams 
IVS a xx a m l>riven by service and Science 

www.maxxamanalytlcs.com 

Your Project #: 10002-017-820 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601 KirkvilleRd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

CERTIFICAT E O F ANALYSI S 

MAXXA M JOB #: A662175 

Received: 2006/06/22,13:50 

Sample Matrix: Filter 

# Samples Received: 4 

Date Date Method 

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

Metals in Air (Front Half) by ICP/MS (5 4 2006/06/28 2006/06729 SOP ING 108/109 EPA SW846-6020 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) fl> 4 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 SOP ING 505 EPA CFR PTM 5 

Particulates in Air (Filter) © 4 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 SOP ING 505 EPA CFR PTM 5 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse (D 4 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 

Sample Matrix: Impinger Solution 

# Samples Received: 4 

Date Date Method 

Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference 

Metals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS Jt 4 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 SOP ING 108/109 EPA SW846-3010A,60 

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Burlington 

MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC. 

MARY-ANNE JOHNSON, B.A, B.Sc. 

Project Manager 

MAJ/maj 

encl. 

..12 

Page 1 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
IV! a rr i Driven by service and Science 

"—• ~ "~ ' ~ www.Miaxxaiiiaiialytics-com 

{ Analytics Inc 

Your Project #: 10002-017-820 

Site: ONYX 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

ENSR International 

6601 Kirkville Rd 

East Syracuse, NY 

USA 13057 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

-2-

Validated by : 

Total cover pages: 2 

Page 2 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toil free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
Driven try serine and Science 

f / Analytics inc www.maxxaman3lvtlcs.com 

ENSR International 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF FILTER 

Maxxam ID M73142 M73143 M73144 M73145 

Sampling Date 2006/06/21 2006/06/19 2006/06/20 2006/06/21 

Jnits M29-RB FH M29-U3-R1 

FH 

M29-U3-R2 

FH 

M29-U3-R3 

F H 

R DL QC Batch M D L 

Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse mg ND 4.0 2.8 1.7 0.5 1001275 0.5 

Volume ml 98 57 87 56 1 1049870 1 

Particulate Weight on Filter mg 0.65 2.20 1.65 1.55 0.30 1001265 0.30 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

Page 3 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
TsA a m 

Driven by service and Science 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

www.maxxamanalyUcs.com 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (FILTER) 

Maxxam ID M73142 M73143 M73143 M73144 M73145 

Sampling Date 2006/06/21 2006/06/19 2006/06/19 2006/06/20 2006/06/21 

Units M29-RB FH M29-U3-R1 

FH 

M29-U3-R1 

FH Lab-Dup 

M29-U3-R2 

FH 

M29-U3-R3 

FH 

R D L QC Batch M D L 

Total Arsenic (As) ug 0.61 5.81 6.01 4.27 5.62 0.40 1001008 0.40 

Total Beryllium (Be) ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 1001008 0.10 

Total Chromium (Cr) ug 0.79 9.64 11.9(1) 3.98 11.1 0.30 1001008 0.30 

|ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

(1 ) Please refer to General Comments page for specific clarification. 

Page 4 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 
Driven by service and Science 

www.maxxamanalytics.com 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

ELEMENTS BY ICP/MS (IMPINGER SOLUTION) 

Maxxam ID M73146 M73147 M73147 M73148 M73149 

Sampling Date 2006/06/21 2006/06/19 2006/06/19 2006/06/20 2006/06/21 

Units M29-RB B H M29-U3-R1 

B H 

M29-U3-R1 

B H Lab-Dup 

M29-U3-R2 

B H 

M29-U3-R3 

B H 

R DL 3 C Batch M D L 

Total Arsenic (As) ug ND 0.33 0.33 ND 0.21 0.20 1001758 0.20 

Total Beryllium (Be) ug ND ND ND 0.087 ND 0.050 1001758 0.050 

Total Chromium (Cr) ug ND 1.06 1.02 0.66 0.84 0.15 1001758 0.15 

ND = Not detected 

RDL = Reportable Detection Limit 

Q C Batch = Quality Control Batch 

' Analytics Inc 

Maxxam Job #:A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

Page 5 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
Driven by servive and Science 

www.maxxamasialytlcs.com 

ENSR International 

Client Project*: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Summary 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73142 

M29-RB FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/21 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 F M O 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73143 

M29-U3-R1 FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/19 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) bv ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 F M O 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73143 Dup 

M29-U3-R1 FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/19 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Front Half) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 NLR I 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73144 

M29-U3-R2 FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/20 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) by ICP/MS 1CP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 F M O 

Maxxam ID 

Sample ID 

Matrix 

M73145 

M29-U3-R3 FH 

Filter 

Collected 

Shipped 

Received 

2006/06/21 

2006/06/22 

Test Description Instrumentation Batch Prepared Analyzed Analyst 

Metals in Air (Front Half) by ICP/MS 1CP1/MS 1001008 2006/06/28 2006/06/29 N R 

Particulates in Air (Acetone Rinse) (M5) BAL 1001275 2006/06/27 2006/06/28 IMR 

Particulates in Air (Filter) BAL 1001265 2006/06/26 2006/06/26 VP2 

Final Volume of Acetone Probe Rinse 1049870 2006/09/11 2006/09/11 F M O 

IS/I a x5^ a m 

f Anoly t i cs In c 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

Page 6 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
M a 

f Analytki Inc 

Driven by service and Science 

Maxxam Job #:A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

Test Summary 

mvw.maixamaiialytics.com 

ENSR International 

Client Project#: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

Test Description 

Maxxam ID M73146 

Samplel D M29-RB BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch Prepared 

Collected 2006/06/21 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Analyzed 

Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Back Halt) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 N R 

Tes t Description 

Maxxam ID M73147 

Sample ID M29-U3-R1 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch Prepared 

Collected 2006/06/19 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Analyzed 

Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 IM_R 

Test Description 

Maxxam ID M73147 Dup 

Sample ID M29-U3-R1 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch Prepared 

Collected 2006/06/19 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Analyzed 

Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 N R 

Tes t Description 

Maxxam ID M73148 

Samplel D M29-U3-R2BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch Prepared 

Collected 2006/06/20 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Analyzed 

Analyst 

IMetals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 N_R 

Tns t Description 

Maxxam ID M73149 

Samplel D M29-U3-R3 BH 

Matrix Impinger Solution 

Instrumentation Batch 

[Metals in Air (Back Half) by ICP/MS 

Prepared 

Collected 2006/06/21 

Shipped 

Received 2006/06/22 

Analyzed 

Analyst 

ICP1/MS 1001758 2006/06/29 2006/06/29 N R 

Page 7 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toil free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
IS/I a m 

t^^r Analytics Inc 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

Report Date: 2006/09/11 

Driven by service and Science 

www.maK£ftinaaalvUc$xom 

ENSR International 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

Project name: ONYX 

Sampler Initials: 

GENERA L COMMENT S 

Results relate only to the items tested. 

Page 8 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax: 905-817-5777 
IVI a y^yi^x r n 

>a An n ly: 

Driven by service and Science 

hNSH tnternational 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project #: 10002-017-820 

P.O. #: 

Project name: ONYX 

www. ma xxa m ana lytic s.co m 

Quality Assurance Report 

Maxxam Job Number GA662175 

QA/Q C 

Batch 

Num Init Q C Type Parameter 

Date 

Analyzed 

wyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units Q C Limits 

1001008 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 49.5, RDU0.4 0 99 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73143) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 49.5, RDL=0.40 99 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 48.0, RDL=0.10 96 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (M73143) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 47.0, RDL=0.10 94 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73143) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 48.5, RDL=0.30 97 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73143) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 47.5, RDL=0.30 95 ug 7 0 - 130 

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 48.5, RDL=0.40 97 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 49.0, RDL=0.40 98 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 59.5, RDL=0.10 119(1) ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDL=0.10 117(1) ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 53.0, RDL=0.30 106 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 53.0, RDL=0.30 106 ug 8 5 - 115 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank DU P Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.40 ug 

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.10 ug 

Method Blank DU P Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.10 ug 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.30 ug 

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.30 ug 

R P D Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 3.4 % 20 

Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 N C % 20 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 21.2(1) % 20 

1001275 IMR Method Blank Particulate Weight in Acetone Rinse 2006/06/28 ND, RDL=0.5 mg 

1001758 N_R MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 48.5, RDL=0.20 97 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (M73147) Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 50.0, RDU0.2 0 100 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 57.5, RDL=0.050 115 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

DUP(M73147) Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDL=0.050 117 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

(M73147) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 50.0, RDL=0.15 100 ug 7 0 - 130 

MATRIX SPIKE 

D U P (M73147) Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 51.0, RDL=0.15 102 ug 7 0 - 130 

Spiked Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 50.5, RDL=0.20 101 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 50.0, RDL=0.20 100 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.5, RDL=0.050 117 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 58.0, RDL=0.050 116 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 52.0, RDL=0.15 104 ug 8 5 - 115 

Spiked Blank DU P Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 52.0, RDL=0.15 104 ug 8 5 - 115 

Method Blank Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.20 ug 

Method Blank DU P Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.20 ug 

Method Blank Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.050 ug 

Method Blank DU P Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.050 ug 

Method Blank Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.15 ug 

Method Blank DU P Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 ND, RDL=0.15 ug 

R P D Total Arsenic (As) 2006/06/29 N C % 20 

Total Beryllium (Be) 2006/06/29 NC % 20 

Total Chromium (Cr) 2006/06/29 4.2 % 20 

ND = Not detected 

Page 9 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
I Analyt hNSH International 

Attention: Jeff Gorman 

Client Project*: 10002-017-820 

P.O. #: 

Project name: ONYX 

Driven by service and Science 

www.ma xxa m analy tf cs.co m 

Quality Assurance Report (Continued) 

Maxxam Job Number GA662175 

NC = Non-calculable 

iRPD = Relative Percent Difference 

|SPIKE = Fortified sample 

1 ) Please refer to General Comments page for specific clarification. 

Page 10 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777 
^ t /Anolytic a Inc 

Driven by ser\->ice and Science 

www.maxxamanalytScs.com 

Validation Signature Page 

Maxxam Job #: A662175 

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s). 

FRANK MO, B.Sc, Inorganic Lab. Manager 

Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of 

ISO/IEC 17O25:2O05(E), signing the reports. SCC and CAEA L have approved this reporting process and electronic report format. 

Page 11 of 11 

6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 2L8 Tel: 905-817-5700 Toll free:800-563-6266 Fax:905-817-5777