alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**









In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Security Resources Corporation
      , a
      Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December
      31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      Frank Neukomm, President and Chief Executive Officer, does hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      his knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Frank
      Neukomm




Frank
      Neukomm


President
      and Chief Executive Officer







October
      31, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Security Resources Corporation and will be retained by the Company
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Marie DUBREUS, Appellant, v. PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CO., Appellee.

No. 4D17-715

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 12, 2010
    /s/ Randall GausmanRandall GausmanVice President and Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HANIFASIM SAEED,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 14 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Kristy S. HOLT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA 18 LLC, and Abundant Property LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D 17-2311

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 31, 2018]

Phillippe Symonovicz of the Law Offices of Phillippe Symonovicz, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ryan Lamchick and Alex Wagner of Lamchick Law Group, P.A., Miami, for appellee Florida 18 LLC.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Taylor and Levine, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,457,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,360,067
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,295,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,582,982
<PP&E>                                      16,441,372
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,746,954)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,852,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,521,353
<BONDS>                                      2,345,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,698
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,847,233
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,852,062
<SALES>                                     13,374,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       10,854,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,772,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (32,997)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (285,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (68,580)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (216,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (216,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6122 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary 

of Labor to conduct a study and issue a report on grant programs 

to support the nursing workforce. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2023 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa (for himself, Ms. TITUS, and Ms. LEE of Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

and the Secretary of Labor to conduct a study and 

issue a report on grant programs to support the nursing 

workforce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Train More Nurses 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6122 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON PROGRAMS SUP2 PORTING THE NURSING WORKFORCE. 

3 The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 

4 Secretary of Labor, jointly, shall— 

5 (1) conduct a review of all grant programs car6 ried out by the Department of Health and Human 

7 Services or the Department of Labor that support 

8 the nurse workforce; and 

9 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en10 actment of this Act, submit to Congress a report on 

11 the review under paragraph (1) that includes rec12 ommendations for changes to such grant programs 

13 to improve upon the goals of— 

14 (A) increasing nurse faculty, particularly 

15 in underserved areas; 

16 (B) providing pathways for nurses who 

17 have more than 10 years of clinical experience 

18 to become faculty at schools of nursing; and 

19 (C) encouraging and increasing the nurs20 ing pipeline through pathways for licensed prac21 tical nurses to become registered nurses. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally

disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may

be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

AUG 8 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-1134

DAVID LANE,

Defendant-Appellant.

(D.C. No. 96-M-3008)

(D.Colo.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

 

Defendant David Lane applies for a certificate of appealability with regard to the

district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, which the

district court correctly interpreted as being brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Lane
2

properly moves for a certificate of appealability because he filed his § 2255 motion in

district court after April 24, 1996, the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective

Death Penalty Act of 1996, which first imposed the requirement for a certificate of

appealability in § 2255 proceedings. See Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997);

United States v. Gutierrez, No. 96-2300, 1997 WL 383296 (10th Cir. July 11, 1997)

(unpublished). However, because Lane fails to make a substantial showing of the denial

of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), we deny his application.

A jury convicted Lane under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2459(b)(2)(C) and 2. We affirmed the

convictions on appeal in United States v. Lane, 883 F.2d 1484 (10th Cir. 1989). The

district court denied the instant motion on the basis that it concerned the same ground

covered in Lane’s trial and appeal. We are of the same opinion. Moreover, the

arguments emphasized in his application for a certificate of appealability are frivolous. 

For example, Lane chiefly argues the federal government lacks criminal jurisdiction over

virtually all crimes occurring within the boundaries of the individual states.

APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
Order entered November 18, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01445 - CV MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT AND EVAN (VAN) LANE SHAW , Appellant s V. MATTHEW ZUCKER, Appellee On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 19 - 17721

ORDER Before the Court is appellee’s November 17, 2020 motion to extend time to file his brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than December 2, 2020. The Court’s July 15, 2020 order providing that this appeal shall be submitted concurrently with its companion appeal, appellate cause number 05

- 20

- 00488

- CV , remains in effect./s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### King *v.*Carnall.

'’CONFEDERATE Money. — Contracts based upon Confederate money are *illegal*and *void.*

*Pleading*— Time *of filing.*— After issue joined, the filing of a special plea, at subsequent term, is within the discretion of the court.

*Appeal from Sebastian Circuit Court.*

Hon. E. J. Searle, Circuit Judge.

*Du Vail §•*King, for appellant.

*Watkins § Bose,*for appellee.

'Bowen, J.

' This is an action of debt brought by appellee against appellant and others, in the circuit court’of Sebastian county.

At the October term, 1866, suit was discontinued as to all -.-the defendants except appellant, who filed, during the term, the -pleas of *nil debit*and set off.

At the April term, 1867, plaintiff took issue to the first plea, .and replied the statute of limitations to the plea of set off.

The defendant filed an additional plea of set off, on a note - executed by John Carnall, in March, 1862, for one thousand /■dollars. To this the plaintiff replied: *First.*The general issue; second, a special replication, setting up that the promissory note executed by Carnall was given for Confederate money, ..and therefore void, the same being an illegal consideration. To this replication the defendant entered his general demurrer, which was overruled. The cause was submitted to the court, • sitting as a jury, who found for the plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly.

It appears from the bill of exceptions that, at the latter term, defendant asked leave to file a special plea, under oath, alleging substantially that the plaintiff, at the time of com*37mencing this suit, had no claim or title to the note sued on*, having previously assigned the same to one Sarah Clark. The-plaintiff objected to the filing, and was sustained therein by. the. court. The defendant excepted to such ruling, and to the-overruling of his motion for a new trial, and the cause is here on appeal.

The only point involved in the overruling of defendant’s, demurrer to plaintiff’s replication to defendant’s second plea of set off is, that of the illegal consideration. “We have, already settled that question in the case of *Clark v. Latham, 25 Ark.*

The refusal of the circuit court to permit defendant to file, his special plea just before going to trial, was a matter which addressed itself to the discretion of the court, and is one with, which we will not interfere, especially since no good reason appears for asking to file at so late a day.

At the trial, in the circuit court, the note sued on was in evidence. The court having refused leave to defendant to file his special plea, and this court sustaining it therein, renders it unnecessary for us to say any thing further.

Judgment affirmed.
Miviolene JASMIN and Mizene Madeus, Appellants, v. Estinvil CELIUS and GEICO Indemnity Company, a Foreign Profit Corporation, Appellees.

No. 4D17-3184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 21, 2018]

Rick S. Jacobs of Miller & Jacobs, Pompano Beach, for appellants.

Richard A. Giardino of Davis, Giardino and Hrivnak, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Estinvil Celius.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Klingensmith and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
[Cite as Brown v. State, 2021-Ohio-4296.]

Terry Brown, Pro Se, #751-619, Belmont Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 540, St. 

Clairsville, Ohio 43950, Relator/Petitioner and 

Atty. David Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Criminal Justice Section, 150 East Gay 

Street, 16th Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43215, and Atty. Vito Abruzzino, Columbiana 

County Prosecutor, 105 South Market Street, Lisbon, Ohio 44432, for Respondent 

(No Response Filed). 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

COLUMBIANA COUNTY

TERRY BROWN, 

Relator/Petitioner, 

v. 

STATE OF OHIO, 

Respondent.

 

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY 

Case No. 21 CO 0022 

 

Writ of Mandamus 

BEFORE: 

David A. D’Apolito, Gene Donofrio, Carol Ann Robb, Judges. 

JUDGMENT: 

Dismissed. 
 – 2 – 

Case No. 21 CO 0022

Dated: November 18, 2021 

PER CURIAM. 

{¶1} Relator, Terry Brown, has petitioned the Court for a writ of mandamus to 

compel Respondent, Judge Scott A. Washam, to accept an affidavit charging an assistant 

prosecuting attorney with perjury and conspiracy under R.C. 2935.09. Because Relator’s 

petition does not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, the Court 

must dismiss this action. 

{¶2} R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a 

civil action against a government employee or entity. Respondent is a government 

employee and Relator, incarcerated in the Belmont Correctional Institution, is a selfrepresented inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if the inmate 

fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement 

of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun. Court, 106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio3671, 831 N.E.2d 435, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure 

to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”). 

{¶3} First, an inmate must “file with the court an affidavit that contains a 

description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the 

previous five years in any state or federal court.” R.C. 2969.25(A). Relator’s petition 

contains no such affidavit. 

{¶4} Second, Relator did not pay the cost deposit required by Loc.R. 2. He also 

failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for an 

inmate who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. He did not file an affidavit 

of waiver and an affidavit of indigency containing a statement of his prisoner trust account 

that sets forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as 

certified by the institutional cashier, as required by R.C. 2969.25(C). 

{¶5} Because Relator did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 

2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Relator. 

{¶6} The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default 

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58. 
 – 3 – 

Case No. 21 CO 0022

 

JUDGE DAVID A. D’APOLITO 

JUDGE GENE DONOFRIO 

JUDGE CAROL ANN ROBB
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of Accufacts Pre-Employment
Screening Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), Philip Luizzo, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of he Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/S/ PHILIP LUIZZO
-----------------

Philip Luizzo

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

March 31, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Accufacts Pre-Employment
Screening, Inc. and will be retained by Accufacts Pre-Employment Screening and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 31, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1861 Lower Tribunal No. 20-16088

________________ 

### Ricardo Grubb and Denise Grubb ,

Appellants,
vs. 

### Citizens Property Insurance Corporation ,

Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge. Gray R. Proctor (Madison, NJ), for appellants. Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., and Jessica C. Conner (Orlando), for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Vincent CHARO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0574

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2018

Vincent Charo, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Any arguments related to the competency order that Petitioner seeks to belatedly appeal in this proceeding are properly raised in the timely appeal in case number 1D18-0601. Accordingly, the petition for belated appeal is hereby dismissed.

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4280

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SCHOLAR MCGLEN JEFFERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CR-04-19)

Submitted: October 21, 2005 Decided: March 7, 2006

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Public Defender, Windy C. Venable, Research and Writing

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Hayes,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Jefferson does not challenge his guilty plea or otherwise

attack the integrity of his convictions.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Scholar Jefferson, pursuant to a plea agreement, pled

guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams

of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000), and using

a firearm in connection with drug trafficking in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (2000). The plea agreement stipulated to a

drug quantity of 1,030.7 grams of cocaine and 17.8 grams of cocaine

base. At sentencing, the district court found Jefferson

responsible for 2,561.6 grams of cocaine. Jefferson objected to

that drug quantity. The district court denied Jefferson’s

objections and sentenced him to 130 months’ imprisonment. 

On appeal, Jefferson asserts that he is entitled to

resentencing because the Government breached the plea agreement.*

In response, the Government has commendably moved for remand,

conceding that it undermined the plea agreement’s stipulation as to

drug quantity by making comments that could be construed as

suggesting that a greater drug quantity finding than that set forth

in the plea agreement would be appropriate.

Jefferson does not oppose a remand for the purpose of

resentencing. We grant the Government’s motion to remand. “We

remand the case to a different district judge for resentencing as

we are required to do.” United States v. Peglera, 33 F.3d 412,
- 3 -

413, 415 (4th Cir. 1994) (citing Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S.

257, 263 (1971)). Therefore, we affirm Jefferson’s conviction,

vacate the sentence imposed by the district court, and remand for

reconsideration of the sentence by a different judge. 

AFFIRMED IN PART,

VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED