alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[EXHIBIT 32.1]

   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
            OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   I,  James Herman, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002, that the Annual Report of North American Liability
Group,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual period ended  December
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained  in  such Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents in  all  material
respects  the  financial condition and results of  operations  of
BioChem Solutions, Inc.



                             By:/s/James Herman
                             ---------------------
                             Name: James Herman
                             Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer





<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE  CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3-5 OF
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10QSB FOR THE  YEAR-TO-DATE  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         3,365,877
<SECURITIES>                                   598,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,047,657 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   135,102   
<INVENTORY>                                    0         
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,191,930 
<PP&E>                                         882,415   
<DEPRECIATION>                                 522,347   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,638,761 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,608   
<BONDS>                                        0         
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0         
<PREFERRED>                                    0         
<COMMON>                                       685,715   
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,747,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,638,761 
<SALES>                                        918,969   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,024,870 
<CGS>                                          524,897   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,226,506 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0         
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             47,652    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,750,712 
<INCOME-TAX>                                   77,000    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,673,712 
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0         
<CHANGES>                                      0         
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,673,712 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .26       
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .26       
                                               


</TABLE>
STATE of Louisiana v. Issa L. LAMIZANA, Jr.

NO. 2017-K-1490

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit-"It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties be notified."

Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.

Witness the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on this 15th day of June, in the year of our Lord, Two Thousand-Eighteen.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Zealous Trading Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sothi
Thillairajah, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ SOTHI
THILLAIRAJAH


Sothi
Thillairajah


Chief
Financial Officer


Date:
June 11, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Zealous Trading Group, Inc. and will be retained by Zealous Trading Group, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6292 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy 

Act of 1977 to extend grants and fellowships for food and agricultural 

sciences education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2023 

Ms. CARAVEO (for herself and Mr. FEENSTRA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the National Agricultural Research, Extension, 

and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 to extend grants and 

fellowships for food and agricultural sciences education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Future Funding for 

5 Agricultural Research, Mentorship, and Education Reau6 thorization Act’’ or the ‘‘Future FARMER Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6292 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS FOR 

2 FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES EDU3 CATION. 

4 Section 1417(m) of the National Agricultural Re5 search, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 

6 U.S.C. 3152(m)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

10 the end and adding ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(3) $40,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 

13 through 2028.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137611 

DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137611 

 COA: 276225 

Wayne CC: 06-625778-CC 

COMMODITIES EXPORT CORPORATION 

and WALTER LUBIENSKI, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan Luis RECENDIS-HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51436 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 6, 2017

*338Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for ' Plaintiff-Appellee

Kristin L. Davidson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Donna F. Coltharp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and' SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Luis Recendis-Herrera pled guilty to illegal reentry into the United States and was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 60 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. In his only argument on appeal, he asserts that because the indictment did not allege that he had a prior felony conviction, his sentence exceeded the two-year statutory maximum sentence set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and violated his due process rights. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent but states that he seeks to preserve it for possible future review. *See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 226, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Recent decisions indicate that the Supreme Court may reconsider the issue. *See Alleyne v. United States,*— U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 2160 n.1, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013).

The Government has filed a motion for summary affirmance, or alternatively, for an extension of time to file a brief. Summary affirmance is proper when, among other instances, “the position of one of the parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case.” *Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis,*406 F.2d 1158, 1162-63 (5th Cir. 1969).

As Recendis-Herrera concedes, his due process argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres.*The Supreme Court’s subsequent decisions in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and *Alleyne*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Juarez-Duarte,*513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008); *United States v. Wallace,*759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40599

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SILVINO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(5:05-CR-2370-ALL)

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Silvino Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez)

appeals the 41-month term of imprisonment imposed on his guiltyplea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. He

objects to the 16-level “crime of violence” enhancement based on

his prior conviction for aggravated battery with a firearm under

Florida Statute Annotated § 784.045(1)(a). After Hernandez filed

his appeal, we held that the relevant offense qualifies as crime of

violence under the Sentencing Guidelines “because it has as an

element at least a threatened use of force.” United States v.
2

Dominguez, 479 F.3d 345, 347-49 (5th Cir. 2007); see

§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), comment. (n.1(B)(iii)). The enhancement of

Hernandez’s sentence was proper.

Hernandez further asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated

felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) cause the statute

to be unconstitutional. This argument is foreclosed under

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).

Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided

and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). We repeatedly have rejected such arguments on the basis

that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.

Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

298 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes that this argument is

foreclosed and that he raises it only to preserve it for further

review.

The judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC

Section 302 Certification

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

I, R. Dodd Haynes,
Chief Financial Officer of Muzak Holdings LLC certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Muzak Holdings LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 2, 2007



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/    R. DODD
HAYNES           
|Name: R. Dodd Haynes            
|Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



(18 U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant Talk Communications Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Annual Report
                                         on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”) of the
                                         Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information
                                         contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 1, 2015 | /s/ Steven van der Velden                                   | 
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                    | Steven van der Velden, President andChief Executive Officer |
Derae JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2138

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 20098

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009.

I,
Nicholas J. Tomashot, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of August 7, 2009.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/    Nicholas J. Tomashot    
|Name: Nicholas J. Tomashot     
|Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1 

 

**TIBCO SOFTWARE INC.**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

1. TIBCO Software International Inc., United States of America 

 

2. TIBCO Extensibility Inc., United States of America 

 

3. TIBCO Talarian Inc., United States of America 

 

4. TIBCO Holdings Inc., United States of America 

 

5. 3301 Hillview Holdings Inc., United Stated of America 

 

6. TIBCO Software Australia Pty. Ltd., Australia 

 

7. TIBCO Software NV, Belgium 

 

8. TIBCO Software Canada Inc., Canada 

 

9. TIBCO Software France SARL, France 

 

10. TIBCO Software GmbH, Germany 

 

11. TIBCO Software Srl, Italy 

 

12. TIBCO Software Japan Inc., Japan 

 

13. TIBCO Software Korea, Korea 

 

14. TIBCO Software Singapore Pte. Ltd., Singapore 

 

15. TIBCO Software SL, Spain 

 

16. TIBCO Software Limited, United Kingdom 

 

17. TIBCO Software BV, Holland 

 

18. TIBCO Software Brasil LTDA, Brazil 

 

19. TIBCO Software Hong Kong, Hong Kong 

 

20. TIBCO Software AS, Norway 

 

21. TIBCO Software AB, Sweden 

 

22. TIBCO Software Portugal, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda., Portugal 

 

23. TIBCO Software India Private Limited, India 

 

24. Talarian Ltd., United Kingdom
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  following Financial Data Schedule contains standard data for the six months
ended  July  5,  2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000883979
<NAME>     Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-05-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-06-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-05-2000
<CASH>                                          78
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              215,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,380
<INVENTORY>                                 36,615
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           256,966
<PP&E>                                      27,568
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             346,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      172,555
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       121
<OTHER-SE>                                 157,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               346,093
<SALES>                                    432,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           432,488
<CGS>                                      376,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              376,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                 9,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.160
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.140


</TABLE>