alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICREPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Forgent Networks, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  JAY C. PETERSON     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Jay  C. Peterson         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | March 17,  2008     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ForgentNetworks, Inc. and will be retained by Forgent Networks, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Internet Capital Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-34736, 333-76870 and 333-76872) on Form S-8 and the registration statement
(no. 333-115702) on Form S-3 of Internet Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries of
our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Internet Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit), comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and related financial statement
schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear
in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Internet Capital Group,
Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 15, 2005
Page 1 of 8
Page 2 of 8
Page 3 of 8
Page 4 of 8
Page 5 of 8
Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 8
 

Page 8 of 8
Adam Stefan THOMAS v. STATE

CR-16-0173

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1997             JUN-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1996             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997             JUN-28-1996
<CASH>                                       5,038,000              11,434,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,274,000              12,803,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,372,000              20,751,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,120,000                 860,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,858,000               5,476,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,075,000              50,657,000
<PP&E>                                      12,916,000               8,542,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,466,000               3,097,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,291,000              67,908,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,254,000              10,396,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       118,000                 125,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,242,000              57,038,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,291,000              67,908,000
<SALES>                                    117,171,000              90,512,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           117,171,000              90,512,000
<CGS>                                       82,829,000              65,152,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              108,295,000              83,538,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,873,000               1,099,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,374,000               8,301,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,330,000               2,842,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,044,000               5,459,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,044,000               5,459,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59                    0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56                    0.42
        


</TABLE>
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

February 17, 2016 

US Department ofTransportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey A venue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Request for Extension of Exemption No. 9944, Regulatory Docket # F AA-2002-12249 

Dear Sirs: 

FAA Flight Inspection Services, (FIS), Operating Certificate # RU3A249N, requests that it be 

granted an extension of exemption No. 9944, as amended. That exemption from 61.3 (a) and 

(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows FIS to issue facsimile pilot certificates and 

medical certificates to crewmembers whose certificates have been lost, destroyed, or 

misplaced. 

There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety 

that were the basis for granting the original exemption. We feel continued operation under the 

provisions of the exemption would be in the public interest. 

Additionally, we request that the exemption period be granted for a period of three years. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

f~rFloyd A. Badsky 

Director of Operations 

Flight Inspection Operations Group 

Flight Inspection Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,473,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  505,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    963,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,056,540
<PP&E>                                         358,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,694,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,382,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,722
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,075,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,694,027
<SALES>                                        475,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475,514
<CGS>                                          229,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,883,724
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,654,325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,432,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,432,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,432,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Brent Morrison, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Regional Health Properties, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|               |        |        |                                       |
|---------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| June 22, 2020 |   | By     | /s/ Brent Morrison               |
|          |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: C.D., A MINOR

PETITION OF: S.D. & B.D., ADOPTIVE 

PARENTS

:

:

:

:

:

No. 738 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        4-MOS                   5-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JUN-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1998             MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                               3,713                   0
<SECURITIES>                         10,620                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                        23,570                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                         1,703                   0
<INVENTORY>                          15,791                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     56,060                  0
<PP&E>                               101,848                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                       3,747                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       304,092                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                41,699                  0
<BONDS>                              140,394                 0
<COMMON>                             0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                           99,687                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         304,092                 0
<SALES>                              86,881                  108,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     86,881                  108,924
<CGS>                                70,788                  92,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        79,651                  103,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     3,358                   5,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   3,696                   5,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      3,872                   87
<INCOME-TAX>                         1,471                   (1,590)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  2,401                   1,677
<DISCONTINUED>                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         2,401                   1,677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0                       0
        


</TABLE>
To: Federal Aviation Administration 

RECEIVED 

OCT 2 4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

d0)y- 08LvJ 

Hello, my name is Maria Marquez; I am doing this in part for my brother Juan Antonio 

Marquez Jr. The reason why I'm writing this is because I'm requesting a hearing done 

for the following violations done by his actions on December 19,2013 I had thought we 

were waiting on a request for a hearing witch had not been done so in this part of mines 

I have to request a hearing in his part. I'm doing this in part for my brother I don't know 

what else is said and needs to be done in this letter but I don't even know much that I 

need to say. So in their for I'm needing to request a hearing here in Bakersfield, 

California for my brother Juan Antonio Marquez Jr. 

\./1 }(}V\fd\_\YXA\UifV'f:?--- C::---

Case No. 2014WP170021 

XJ/72~ !f;vq--

rf\ '1 1" hO 'U :::F\==' 
L PRESS FIRMLY TO SEAL i1l 

UNITriDST!).Tf':S 

POSTALSE'TIV/Cfi 

tG07 

U.S. POSIHbt. 

PAID BAKERSFIELD, CA 93305 

OCT 22. '14 AMOUNT 

$19.99 00055137-11 

Y 

 _________ _ I f.~ 

 

i~lli~~il·~~~l~!mliH 

EG 

~------\ 

Mailing label 

Label 1')-B, March 2004 •*EXPRESS 

M111L 

uNITED srLlrEs posrllLSEnvJcE® Post Office To Addressee 

~=J!i"lfH"'ill 

!4lWf~tf!"1&11!t !;&ill! ---

Delivery Attempt I T me 0 A~ Employee S1grmtum 

~BJ§i\Q 

J IT I Mo Day D PM 

I o..,c_1~np/" I j Dei'Jery Attempt 1 Time 0 AN' Employ<:le S gnature I I nPM\ 1 I 'Signature \ 

I 

 q· -~·vo••• ~- w 'k '-1 ~ '-1 -~----~~Mo. 0"" CmP''"' 

-~ '\sNel<r .-_. d ,2ndDai.D~yj'_~-f== _ jf,-;-- \Delivery Date lime 01'<M\ 

/ ~ ~of Delivery llieturn Recslpt ce 0 --

 

- '---;I Sche.,l 

1 

- "' C} \1 j_ 1 Mo. Day --' -~~~ - ----

·~~~~·~~~ .. ~·~-~~~~~~~~·~·!·~·~ci~-~--~,~:rn:rr:~§·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

~~~~;:'~:~ t~~~~~: Acd No 0 -;:'t,%~~.!/'m51,Gt_'li..TUHE (Domestic Mail Only) 

· · • "'''" '"' coorncoo lo oo!O If 

""''"m'"''""'"' woloo>O! olgcoru,o. 

 I w'"o "'"'' Jo bo moO. w<Ooo<oOJo!clc, 

0

; ""'"~ 

Podoml Ago coy Aoct. No m of ooore~oo '""re""'' ogoc<OI """' lmploy" 

Poo!ol SoNioo AooC No. JP~~"'I ~ol """" 

000 

bo loft lc "oore Jooo!loc)ocd I 

 :, ,';,~~:",j'J~~~,j' ompi•Y"'' olgoo<ore oocoltto!M 

 0 NO DELIVERY 

FROM· ; ~'-\ Weekend Hollda 0 Malter Signature 

. "'~""'"" '"'''' '()"''' I 

,--- TO""'"' '""' '"'" ( I I 

 .. J oo n A" \tJ c> 11) fY\cw<f"'- z_ Jy • 1' e.A ''"'I (\vi eM on ~'"'' "''""'""; 

 \ :r-n-- cvcc<<~)~o;"d ,s\- .. !??o Svv:le;\"~nc\:ence. f"ve, ,.s~_,...) 

. . . , . . . vl.l \\ ~\,.) ·.....- 'w "''fj h'~- 8:M \J I "J 1 s\) ,.H .. 

\Sot\L.t'v-s+,-e ld_ 

1 

C'f'r Ci~~c,s- \NQt6h1<\5-\-on 1 DL 2.-DS"'ql 2.-WHlOD 

iiP.j!iiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii-ii·ii--iiiiiliiiiliiiiiiiiiid Zli' + 4(U,S. /IDORE.!'iS:SS ONLY. 00 N~T USE FO~ FO\\Eir?.N PO_STAL CODiiG.) + 

FOR INTeRNATIONAL DESTINATIONS, WRITE COUNTRY NAME BELOW. 

,., 

I 

_j 

!NITED STIJTES 

-r>OSTIJL SERVICE
#### Barry CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer S. KHAN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-2516

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 30, 2017

Decided: July 27, 2017

Donald F. Rosendorf, LAW OFFICE OF DONALD F. ROSENDORF, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Julia B. Judkins, BANCROFT, MCGAVIN, HOR-VATH *&*JUDKINS, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Barry Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated with respect to the existence of probable cause to arrest Carter for the equipment violation and with respect to its holding that the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on Carter’s use of force claim due to the absence of clearly established law. *Carter v. Kahn,*No. 1:15-cv-00572-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2015). We express no opinion on the district court’s finding with respect to the existence of probable cause to arrest Carter for obstruction of justice or with respect to the conclusion that the use of force was objectively reasonable. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

Order 

September 23, 2009 

138745 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138745 

 COA: 283210 

Wayne CC: 07-014043-FC 

MARQUEZ MAURICE GOINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court, 

and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. For the reasons stated in 

the Court of Appeals opinion, the trial court’s scoring of offense variable 13 was 

improper. The Court of Appeals alternate basis for scoring OV 13 was improper because 

it impermissibly included conduct that was already scored under OV 12. MCL 

777.43(2)(c). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 MARKMAN, J. (concurring). 

 Justice Weaver dissents because she is “not persuaded that the decision of the 

Court of Appeals was clearly erroneous or that defendant has suffered any material 

injustice . . . .” It is difficult to understand how Justice Weaver can assert that this 

decision was not “clearly erroneous” when the Court of Appeals cited conduct scored 

under OV 12 to justify the scoring of OV 13 contrary to the express command of MCL 

777.43(2)(c). It is equally difficult to understand how Justice Weaver can assert that 

defendant has not suffered any “material injustice” where the trial court imposed a 

minimum sentence of 132 months when it thought the correct guideline range was 126 to 

210 months while the correct guideline range is 108 to 180 months. Thus, the lower 

courts unmistakably applied the law in an “erroneous” manner, and equally unmistakably 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 23, 2009 

0916 

 

2

caused a “material injustice” to a person who, but for the instant order, might have been 

imprisoned for a term beyond that intended by the Legislature and the trial court. 

 WEAVER, J., (dissenting). 

 I dissent. I would not vacate the sentence and remand this case and I would deny 

leave to appeal because I am not persuaded that the decision of the Court of Appeals was 

clearly erroneous or that defendant has suffered any material injustice in this case.
Rosemarie Sophia RESSEGIUE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Robert Glenn RESSEGIUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-3250

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1ST QTR. 10Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (250)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,469
<PP&E>                                           3,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,146)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,099
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,830
<SALES>                                             50
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,040)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,040)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>