Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Notices 9575 

1See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 86 FR 62990 

(November 15, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure 

Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, 

the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation 

of Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 60 

FR 25691 (May 12, 1995) (Order). 

3The meaning of this term is the same as that 

used by the American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ATSM) in its Annual Book for ASTM 

Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and 

Magnesium Alloys. 

4See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 62990. 

5See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 62990. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Pure Magnesium from the 

People’s Republic of China; 05/01/2020–04/30/ 

2021: Entry Data and No Shipment Inquiry,’’ dated 

August 31, 2021. On August 3, 2021, Commerce 

issued a no shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) with respect to TMI/TMM. 

On August 4, 2021, CBP responded that it had no 

evidence of shipments of magnesium metal from 

China exported by TMI/TMM during the POR. 

7See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

the merchandise subject to this order is 

dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03659 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–832] 

Pure Magnesium From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that 

Tianjin Magnesium International Co., 

Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium 

Metal Co., Ltd. (TMM) (collectively, 

TMI/TMM) had no shipments of subject 

merchandise covered by the 

antidumping duty order on pure 

magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) for the period of review 

(POR) May 1, 2020, through April 30, 

2021. 

DATES: Applicable February 22, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 15, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register.1 No interested party 

submitted comments concerning the 

Preliminary Results or requested a 

hearing in this administrative review. 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 2

The product covered by the Order is 

pure magnesium from China, regardless 

of chemistry, form or size, unless 

expressly excluded from the scope of 

the Order. Pure magnesium is a metal or 

alloy containing by weight primarily the 

element magnesium and produced by 

decomposing raw materials into 

magnesium metal. Pure primary 

magnesium is used primarily as a 

chemical in the aluminum alloying, 

desulfurization, and chemical reduction 

industries. In addition, pure magnesium 

is used as an input in producing 

magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium 

encompasses products (including, but 

not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns 

and crystals) with the following primary 

magnesium contents: 

(1) Products that contain at least 

99.95% primary magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra pure’’ 

magnesium) Magnesium Alloy’’ 3 and 

are thus outside the scope of the 

existing antidumping orders on 

magnesium from China (generally 

referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). 

(2) Products that contain less than 

99.95%, but not less than 99.8%, 

primary magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’ 

magnesium); and 

(3) Products that contain 50% or 

greater, but less than 99.8% primary 

magnesium, by weight, and that do not 

conform to ASTM specifications for 

alloy magnesium (generally referred to 

as ‘‘off-specification pure’’ magnesium). 

‘‘Off-specification pure’’ magnesium 

is pure primary magnesium containing 

magnesium scrap, secondary 

magnesium, oxidized magnesium or 

impurities (whether or not intentionally 

added) that cause the primary 

magnesium content to fall below 99.8% 

by weight. It generally does not contain, 

individually or in combination, 1.5% or 

more, by weight, of the following 

alloying elements: Aluminum, 

manganese, zinc, silicon, thorium, 

zirconium and rare earths. 

Excluded from the scope of the Order 

are alloy primary magnesium (that 

meets specifications for alloy 

magnesium), primary magnesium 

anodes, granular primary magnesium 

(including turnings, chips and powder) 

having a maximum physical dimension 

(i.e., length or diameter) of one inch or 

less, secondary magnesium (which has 

pure primary magnesium content of less 

than 50% by weight), and remelted 

magnesium whose pure primary 

magnesium content is less than 50% by 

weight. 

Pure magnesium products covered by 

the Order are currently classifiable 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 

8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 

8104.30.00, 8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 

3824.90.19 and 9817.00.90. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined TMI/TMM had no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR.4 As noted 

in the Preliminary Results, we received 

no-shipment statements from TMI/ 

TMM,5 and the statements were 

consistent with the information we 

received from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP).6 Because Commerce 

did not receive any comments on its 

preliminary finding, Commerce 

continues to find that TMI/TMM did not 

have any shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Assessment Rates 

Based on record evidence, we have 

determined that TMI/TMM had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR, and, therefore, 

pursuant to Commerce’s assessment 

practice, any suspended entries entered 

under their case number will be 

liquidated at the China-wide entity 

rate.7

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
9576 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 35 / Tuesday, February 22, 2022 / Notices 

8See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of the 2008–2009 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 80791 (December 

23, 2010). 

1See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and 

Subassemblies Thereof from the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of 

Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional 

Measures, 86 FR 54164 (September 30, 2021) 

(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Mobile Access 

Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Decision Memorandum 

for the Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less-Than-Fair-Value,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Mobile Access 

Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Decision Memorandum 

for the Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less-Than-Fair-Value,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Certain Mobile Access Equipment and 

Subassemblies Thereof from the People’s Republic 

of China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value 

Investigation, 86 FR 15922, 15927 (March 25, 2021) 

(Initiation Notice). 

5See Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum 

at 2. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Investigations of Certain 

Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Scope Decision Memorandum,’’ dated October 12, 

2021 (Final Scope Decision Memorandum). 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of review, as 

provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act: (1) For TMI/TMM, which 

claimed no shipments, the cash deposit 

rate will remain unchanged from the 

rate assigned to TMI/TMM in the most 

recently completed review of the 

companies; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters who are not 

under review in this segment of the 

proceeding but who have separate rates, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the exporter-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the China-wide rate 

of 111.73 percent; 8 and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protection Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return of 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Dated: February 14, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–03662 Filed 2–18–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–139] 

Certain Mobile Access Equipment and 

Subassemblies Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

mobile access equipment and 

subassemblies thereof (mobile access 

equipment) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) are being, or are likely 

to be sold, in the United States at less 

than fair value (LTFV). 

DATES: Applicable February 22, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla or Andre Gziryan, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3477 or (202) 482–2201, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 30, 2021, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register its 

preliminary determination in the LTFV 

investigation of mobile access 

equipment from China, in which it also 

postponed the final determination until 

February 14, 2022.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Determination. For a 

summary of the events that occurred 

since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Determination, as well as a 

full discussion of the issues raised by 

parties for this final determination, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation is July 1, 

2020, through December 31, 2020. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The products covered by this 

investigation are mobile access 

equipment from China. For a complete 

description of the scope of this 

investigation, see Appendix I. 

Scope Comments 

On July 26, 2021, we issued a 

Preliminary Scope Decision 

Memorandum.3 As discussed in the 

Preliminary Determination, Commerce 

did not modify the scope language as it 

appeared in the Initiation Notice.4

Interested parties were provided an 

opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Scope Decision 

Memorandum in scope case and rebuttal 

briefs.5 We received comments from 

interested parties on the Preliminary 

Scope Decision Memorandum, which 

we addressed in the Final Scope 

Decision Memorandum.6 Commerce is 

modifying the scope language as it 

appeared in the Preliminary 

Determination. See Appendix I for the 

final scope of this investigation. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon in making its final 

determination in this investigation. 

However, we took additional steps in 

lieu of an on-site verification to verify 

the information provided by the two 

mandatory respondents, Zhejiang Dingli 

Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli) and 

Lingong Group Jinan Heavy Machinery 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1