alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Agreement, dated March 29, 2012



 Exhibit 10.2 
 [Central 1 Credit Union Letterhead] 
  

	 March 29, 2012 
	VIA EMAIL 

 Thomas Schneider 

Schneider Power Providence Bay Inc. 
 49 Bathurst
Street, Suite 101 
 Toronto, Ontario 

M5V 2P2 
 Dear Mr. Schneider: 

 

	Re:	Central 1 Credit Union, Community First Credit Union Ltd and Espanola District & Credit Union Limited (the “Lenders”) loan to Schneider Power
Providence Bay Inc. (the “Borrower”) 

 We confirm the Lenders are prepared to offer you a renewal of the Term Loan
as provided for in the Commitment Letter dated March 5, 2007, as amended by the Commitment Letter Amending Agreements dated November 20, 2008 and June 24, 2011, on the same terms and conditions as contained therein and upon receipt
of a renewal fee in the amount of $1,000.00. We have outlined below the renewal terms available: 
 Facility 2, Term Loan:

 Effective Date – April 10, 2012 
 Outstanding Principal Balance – $1,161,871.64 
 Remaining Amortization – 10 years

 Term – 5 years 
 Interest Rate
– 6.00% 
 Blended Monthly Payment of principal and interest – $12,899.16 
 First Payment Date – May 10, 2012 
 Maturity Date – April 10, 2017 

Kindly acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this renewal by signing below and returning to our office at your earliest convenience.

 Yours truly, 
 /s/ Maryna
Mykhaylychenko 
 Maryna Mykhaylychenko 

Credit Services Officer 
 Central 1 Credit
Union 
 2810 Matheson Blvd. E. 

Mississauga, ON L4W 4X7 
 T. (905) 282-8528

 F. (905) 238-5181 







 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE 
 We hereby acknowledge and accept the terms and conditions of the renewal of the Credit Facility as outlined above. 

 

			
	SCHNEIDER POWER PROVIDENCE BAY INC.
		
	Per:	 	/s/ Thomas Schneider
	Name: Thomas Schneider
	Title: President
	I/we have the authority to bind the Corporation


 GUARANTORS 
 The undersigned has read, understands and accepts the terms and conditions of the renewal of the Credit Facility in its capacity as the Guarantor of the obligations of the Borrower therein. 

 

			
	SCHNEIDER POWER INC.
		
	Per:	 	/s/ Thomas Schneider
	Name: Thomas Schneider
	Title: President
	I/we have the authority to bind the Corporation
Gregory D. STEWART, Appellant, v. Melinda T. STEWART, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-738

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                                OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------                ----------------
<S>                                                       <C>

American Factoring, Inc.                                  Nevada

Limited Too Store Planning, Inc.                          Ohio

Limited Too Purchasing, Inc.                              Ohio

Limited Too Catalog Production, Inc.                      Ohio

Limited Too Direct, LLC                                   Ohio

Limited Too Creative Design, Inc.                         Ohio

Mish Mash, LLC                                            Ohio

Too Brands Investment, LLC                                Ohio

Too G.C., LLC                                             Ohio

Too Brands, Inc.                                          Ohio

Too Retail & Sales Puerto Rico, Inc.                      Puerto Rico
</TABLE>



                                      105
Racarida Cortez GOODMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joseph SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LUCK, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICREPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,the undersigned, Jay C. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of Forgent Networks, Inc.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended April 30,2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  JAY C. PETERSON     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Jay  C. Peterson         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | June 15,  2009      |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Forgent Networks, Inc. and will be retained by ForgentNetworks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.  The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

1

----
exhibit1011.htm


Exhibit 10.11


 


 


AGREEMENT



 


This agreement (“Agreement”), entered into on June 1, 2011 is between Assured Pharmacy, Inc. (together with its affiliates, the “Company”) and Halpern Capital, Inc. (“HC”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Assured Pharmacy, Inc. is a publicly traded Company;


 


WHEREAS, HC is a broker-dealer in the business of providing capital raising and financial advisory services:


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties agree as follows:


 


As payment in full for financial advisory services rendered to the Company, the Company shall issue Ninety thousand (90,000) shares of fully-paid, non-assessable common stock of the Company (the “Shares”).  The Shares shall be registered to Baruch Halpern Revocable Trust dtd 6/13/06.


 


Accepted and agreed to as of the date first written above:




 



	
ASSURED PHARMACY, INC.

	
HALPERN CAPITAL, INC.


	 	 
	 	 
	  	  
	
By:  /s/  Robert DelVecchio                                 

	
By:  /s/  Baruch Halpern                                         


	
Name:   Robert DelVecchio

	
Name:   Baruch Halpern


	
Title:     Chief Executive Officer

	
Title:     President












 


 


 




 


 






  





- 1 -
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 The Board
of Directors
 Natural
Gas Services Group, Inc.
 Midland,
Texas
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-147311 and No. 333-110954) and the registration statements (No.
333-119502 and No. 333-122687) on Form S-3, of Natural Gas Services Group, Inc.
of our report dated March 2, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Natural Gas Services Group, Inc for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 
 /s/ HEIN & ASSOCIATES
LLP
 
 Dallas,
Texas
 March 2,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         303,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               433,509
<PP&E>                                         982,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,896,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,634,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,778
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,286,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,896,420
<SALES>                                         99,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,274
<CGS>                                           22,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,024,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,011,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,011,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,011,259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.164)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.164)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6316 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 340
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6316

                          [Report No. 118-413]

To amend title 40, United States Code, to establish an expiration date 
 of certain committee resolutions with respect to leases or projects, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2023

 Ms. Titus (for herself and Mr. Perry) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                             March 7, 2024

   Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
                    Union and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 40, United States Code, to establish an expiration date 
 of certain committee resolutions with respect to leases or projects, 
                        and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Section 3307 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Expiration of Committee Resolutions.--
            ``(1) In general.--Unless a lease is awarded or a 
        construction, alteration, repair, design, or acquisition 
        project is initiated not later than 5 years after the 
        resolution approvals adopted by the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives or the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
        pursuant to subsection (a), such resolutions shall be deemed 
        expired.
            ``(2) Application.--This subsection shall only apply to 
        resolutions approved after the date of enactment of this 
        subsection.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 340

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6316

                          [Report No. 118-413]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 40, United States Code, to establish an expiration date 
 of certain committee resolutions with respect to leases or projects, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 7, 2024

   Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the 
                    Union and ordered to be printed
```
#### IN RE: Eliston F. GEORGE, Petitioner

No. 17-1129

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

(Opinion filed: May 4, 2017)

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 23, 2017

Eliston F. George, Pro Se

Pamela R. Tepper, Esq., Su-Layne U. Walker, Esq., Office of Attorney General of Virgin Islands, Department of Justice, St. Thomas, VI, for Defendant-Respondent

Before: SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

Eliston F. George filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of audita querela. The District Court has since ruled on George’s petition, and George has filed a notice of appeal. In light of the District Court’s action, the question George presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964, 974 (3d Cir. 1992).

*

 This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6398 

To increase the asset thresholds at which financial institutions become subject 

to certain requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To increase the asset thresholds at which financial institutions become subject to certain requirements, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Institution 

5 Regulatory Tailoring Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED ASSET THRESHOLDS. 

7 (a) BUREAU SUPERVISION.—Section 1025(a) of the 

8 Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 

9 5515) is amended by striking ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each 

10 place it occurs and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

2 

•HR 6398 IH

1 (b) DURBIN AMENDMENT REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

2 921(a)(6) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 

3 1693o–2(a)(6)) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

5 (c) VOLKER RULE REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

6 13(h)(1)(B)(i) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 

7 (12 U.S.C. 1851(h)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

9 (d) QUALIFIED MORTGAGE REQUIREMENTS.—Sec10 tion 129C(b)(F)(i) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 

11 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(F)(i)) is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

13 (e) LEVERAGE AND RISK-BASED CAPITAL REQUIRE14 MENTS.—Section 201(a)(3)(A) of the Economic Growth, 

15 Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (12 

16 U.S.C. 5371 note (a)(3)(A)) is amended by striking 

17 ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Mark M. Smith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Moving Bytes Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 14, 2005





/s/ Mark Smith

Mark M. Smith

Chief Financial Officer





---
Exhibit 10.11

 

Compensation Committee

Assured Guaranty Ltd.

30 Woodbourne Ave

Hamilton, Bermuda

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

Re: Assured Guaranty Ltd. Executive Severance Plan

 

I hereby acknowledge that I have been designated as a participant in the Assured Guaranty Ltd. Executive Severance Plan (the “Plan”) by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (the “Company”) with my continued participation and entitlement to benefits, if any, as provided by the Plan subject to all terms of the Plan.  I hereby acknowledge and agree that, in consideration for my participation in the Plan and eligibility for benefits, if any, as provided by the Plan, I shall comply with all of the restrictions and obligations imposed on Participants by the Plan, including, but not limited to, the Participant obligations listed in Section 7 of the Plan.  I further acknowledge and agree that my failure to comply with all such restrictions and obligations shall cause me to forfeit any right to the Severance Payment (as defined in the Plan) to the extent the Severance Payment has not yet been paid to me, or cause me to be required to repay the Severance Payment to the Company to the extent that the Severance Payment has previously been paid to me, in addition to being subject to such other remedies that may be pursued by the Company pursuant to Section 7.10 of the Plan.

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
[Name]
    	
 
    
	
[Title]
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:
J.S. v. BALDWIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160345

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### IN RE: Loren MILLER; Sarah Miller, Debtors, Loren Miller, Appellant, v. Jeremy W. Faith, Trustee, Appellee.

No. 16-55032

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 21, 2017

Loren Miller, Pro Se

Noreen A. Madoyan, Craig G. Margu-lies, Attorney, Meghann Ahern Triplett, Margulies Faith, LLP, Encino, CA, for Appellee

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 7 debtor Loren Miller appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying his . motions to convert his petition and to transfer venue. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review' the bankruptcy court’s decision independently, without giving deference to the district court. *Rosson v. Fitzgerald (In re Rosson),*545 F.3d 764, 770 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Miller’s motion to convert his Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings to Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings because the record supports the bankruptcy court’s finding that Miller had acted in bad faith. *See*11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (granting courts power to take any action or make any determination necessary to prevent an abuse of process); *Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.,*549 U.S. 365, 373-76, 127 S.Ct. 1105, 166 L.Ed.2d 956 (2007) (the right to convert bankruptcy proceedings is impliedly limited by the bankruptcy court’s power to take any action necessary to prevent bad-faith conduct or abuse of the bankruptcy process); *see also In re Rosson,*545 F.3d at 771 (9th Cir. 2008) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion a bankruptcy court’s decision to convert a bankruptcy case, and for clear error its factual findings).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Miller’s motion to transfer his bankruptcy proceedings because Miller has not demonstrated that such relief is in the interest of justice or for the convenience of the parties. *See*Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1014 (bankruptcy court may transfer the ease to any other district if the court determines that the transfer is in -the interest of justice or for the convenience of the parties); *see also Decker Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co.,*805 F.2d 834, 842 (9th Cir. 1986) (standard of review).

Miller’s motions to file a late reply brief (Docket Entry Nos. 18, 19) are denied as moot.

Miller’s request to take judicial notice of the underlying proceedings, set forth in his opening brief, is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 99.01****SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS****Years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005****(in thousands)**                       Balance at Charged to Costs     Write-offs Net Balance at End of  Beginning of and     of of  Year Expenses Other Recoveries Year**Allowance forDoubtful Accounts**                    2007 $3,313  $1,413  $(4) $(924) $3,798 2006  1,377   2,187   1,485(1)  (1,736)  3,313 2005  1,399   719   21  (753)  1,377 **Valuation AllowanceforDeferred Tax Assets**                    2007 $357,910  $(54,340) $—   —  $303,570 2006  399,444   (41,534)  —   —   357,910 2005  379,191   20,253   —   —   399,444  (1) Due to acquisition of Moving.com.