Affirmed as modified; Opinion Filed January 25, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 01429
- CR No. 05
- 17
- 01430
- CR No. 05
- 17
- 01431
- CR CHRISTOPHER LAJUAN DAVIS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F09
- 72077
- M , F10
- 72780
- M, F12
- 70385
- M



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Osborne

Opinio n by Justice Myers Appellant Christopher Lajuan Davis appeals his convictions, following the adjudication of his guilt, for (1) possession with intent to deliver phencyclidine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams, (2) aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and (3) assault causing bodily injury involving family violence enhanced by a previous conviction for assault involving family violence. The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment in the dru g case, eighteen years’ imprisonment in the aggravated assault case, and ten years’ imprisonment in the assault involving family violence case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which

s he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and witho ut merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See– 2

–

High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 81 2 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders ) . Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See
Kell y v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) ( noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App . 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal s
. Although not an arguable issue, we note the judgment s adjudicating guilt incorrectly recite there were plea bargain terms in th e s e case s and that the attorney representing the State was

“ Patrick Capetillo

. ” The record, however, shows appellant entered open plea s of true to t he allegations in the motion s to adjudicate , and Jennifer Balido r epresented the State during the proceedings

. Accordingly, on our own motion, we modify the section of each judgment entitled “terms of plea b argain” to show “open,” and the section entitled “attorney for state” to show
“Je nnifer Balido.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State , 865 S.W.2d 26, 27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (courts of appeals have authority to modify a judgment); Estrada v. State , 334 S.W.3d 57, 63

– 64 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2009, no pet.) (same). As modified, w e af

firm the trial court’s judgments adjudicating guilt.

/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 171429F.U05– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER LAJUAN DAVIS, Appellant
No. 05

- 17

- 01429

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09

- 72077

- M. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Molberg and Osborne participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment adjudicating guilt of the trial court is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Jennifer Balido.” The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modifie d to show “Open.” As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered this 25 th day of January, 2019.– 4

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER LAJUAN DAVIS, Appellant
No. 05

- 17

- 01430

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 72780

- M. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Molberg and Osborne participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment adjudicating guilt of the trial court is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Jennifer Balido.” The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to sho w “Open.” As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered this 25 th day of January, 2019.– 5

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER LAJUAN DAVIS, Appellant
No. 05

- 17

- 01431

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 70385

- M. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Molberg and Osborne participating.
Based on the Court’s opini on of this date, the judgment adjudicating guilt of the trial court is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Attorney for State” is modified to show “Jennifer Balido.” The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.” As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered this 25 th day of January, 2019.