Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 69995 

* * * * * 

Dated: November 18, 2013. 

Bernadette Dunham, 

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. 

[FR Doc. 2013–27917 Filed 11–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2013–0936] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Upper Mississippi River, Rock Island, 

IL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Rock Island 

Railroad and Highway Drawbridge 

across the Upper Mississippi River, mile 

482.9, at Rock Island, Illinois. The 

deviation is necessary to allow the 

bridge owner time to perform preventive 

maintenance and critical repairs that are 

essential to the continued safe operation 

of the drawbridge. The work is 

scheduled in the winter, when the 

impact on navigation is minimal, 

instead of scheduling the work at other 

times in the year, when river traffic is 

prevalent. This deviation allows the 

bridge to be maintained in the closedto-navigation position for 77 days. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

7:30 a.m., December 18, 2013 to 7:30 

a.m. March 4, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, USCG–2013–0936, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Type the docket number in the 

‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ 

Click on Open Docket Folder on the line 

associated with this deviation. You may 

also visit the Docket Management 

Facility in Room W12–140 on the 

ground floor of the Department of 

Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Eric A. 

Washburn, Bridge Administrator, 

Western Rivers, Coast Guard; telephone 

(314) 269–2378, email Eric.Washburn@

uscg.mil. If you have questions on 

viewing the docket, call Cheryl F. 

Collins, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone (202)366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. 

Army Rock Island Arsenal requested a 

temporary deviation for the Rock Island 

Railroad and Highway Drawbridge, mile 

482.9, at Rock Island, Illinois across the 

Upper Mississippi River. It has a 

vertical clearance of 23.8 feet above 

normal pool in the closed position. The 

Rock Island Railroad and Highway 

Drawbridge currently operates in 

accordance with 33 CFR 117.5, which 

states the general requirement that 

drawbridges shall open promptly and 

fully for the passage of vessels when a 

request to open is given in accordance 

with the subpart. 

The deviation period is from 7:30 

a.m., December 18, 2013 to 7:30 a.m., 

March 4, 2014 when the draw span will 

remain in the closed-to-navigation 

position. During this time the bridge 

owner will replace critical control 

components that are essential to the 

continued safe operation of the 

drawbridge. The bridge will not be able 

to open for emergencies and there is no 

immediate alternate route for vessels to 

pass this section of the Upper 

Mississippi River. The Coast Guard will 

also inform the users of the waterway 

through our Local and Broadcast 

Notices to Mariners of the change in 

operating schedule for the bridge so that 

vessels can arrange their transits to 

minimize any impact caused by the 

temporary deviation. 

Winter conditions on the Upper 

Mississippi River coupled with the 

closure of Army Corps of Engineer’s 

Lock No. 18 (Mile 410.5 UMR) and Lock 

No. 22 (Mile 301.2 UMR) till 11 a.m., 

March 4, 2014 will preclude any 

significant navigation demands for the 

drawspan opening. 

There are no alternate routes for 

vessels transiting this section of the 

Upper Mississippi River. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: November 5, 2013. 

Eric A. Washburn, 

Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28039 Filed 11–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0585; FRL–9903–14– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri; Restriction of Emission of 

Sulfur Compounds and Emissions 

Banking and Trading 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving two 

revisions to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) for Missouri that were 

submitted on September 5, 2012. The 

revision to the Missouri rule 

‘‘Restriction of Emission of Sulfur 

Compounds’’ removes redundant sulfur 

dioxide standards and outdated 

compliance dates. Due to these 

revisions, several within-rule references 

are amended. Revisions to the Missouri 

rule ‘‘Emissions Banking and Trading’’ 

removes all definitions, as they are now 

included in the general definitions rule. 

The reference to the state’s Ambient Air 

Quality Standards rule that is included 

in the definition of National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards is also removed. 

The revisions to Missouri’s rules do not 

have an adverse affect on air quality. 

EPA’s approval of this SIP revision is 

being done in accordance with the 

requirements of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective January 21, 2014, without 

further notice, unless EPA receives 

adverse comment by December 23, 

2013. If EPA receives adverse comment, 

we will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0585, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Amy 

Bhesania, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013– 

0585. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
69996 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

Federal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by 

email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is approving two revisions to the 

Missouri SIP submitted to EPA on 

September 5, 2012. The revision to 

Missouri rule 10 CSR 10–6.260, 

‘‘Restriction of Emission of Sulfur 

Compounds’’ removes redundant sulfur 

dioxide standards and outdated 

compliance dates. Due to these 

revisions, several within-rule references 

are amended. Revisions to Missouri rule 

10 CSR 10–6.410, ‘‘Emissions Banking 

and Trading’’ removes all definitions, as 

they are now included in the general 

definitions rule. The reference to the 

State’s Ambient Air Quality Standards 

rule that was included in the definition 

of National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards is also removed. 

EPA has conducted an analysis of the 

State’s amendments and has concluded 

that these revisions do not adversely 

affect the stringency of the SIP or 

adversely impact air emissions. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements of 40 CFR 

51.102 for SIP submissions. The 

submission also satisfied the 

completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix V. In addition, the revision 

meets the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving two revisions to the 

Missouri SIP. The first revision will 

amend 10 CSR 10–6.260 ‘‘Restriction of 

Emission of Sulfur Compounds,’’ and 

will remove redundant sulfur dioxide 

standards and outdated compliance 

dates. The state is removing the 

reference to 10 CSR 10–6.010, which 

refers to the Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. The section is redundant in 

that sources have to comply with this 

requirement through other SIP approved 

permitting programs and rules, and it is 

burdensome and costly to update this 

reference each time the rule is revised. 

Several within-rule references are 

amended to accommodate the revisions. 

The second revision amends 10 CSR 

10–6.410 ‘‘Emissions Banking and 

Trading’’ by removing definitions, as 

they are now included in the general 

definitions rule. In addition to removing 

the definition of National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards, a reference to the 

State’s Ambient Air Quality Standards 

rule will also be removed. 

EPA has determined that these 

changes will not relax the SIP or 

adversely impact air emissions. For 

more information about these changes, 

see the Technical Support Document 

which is available in the public docket 

for this rulemaking. 

We are processing this action as a 

direct final action because the revisions 

do not adversely impact air emissions, 

and we do not anticipate any adverse 

comments. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 69997 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by January 21, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and 

recordingkeeping requirements. 

Dated: November 8, 2013. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entries 

for 10–6.260 and 10–6.410 to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1320 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS

Missouri 

citation Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

*******

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of 

Missouri 

*******

10–6.260 ...... Restriction of Emission of Sulfur 

Compounds.

09/30/12 11/22/13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

Section (3)(A)(1–4) approved pursuant to 111d only. 

10–6.410 ...... Emissions Banking and Trading ...... 09/30/12 11/22/13 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–28002 Filed 11–21–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES