alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-004]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed February 7, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through February 14, 2022 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20220015, Draft, FERC, LA,*                     MP66-69 Compression Relocation and Modification Amendment and the MP33 Compressor Station Modification Amendment Project,  Comment Period Ends: 04/04/2022, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-3372.                

*EIS No. 20220016, Draft, TVA, TN,*                     Clinch River Nuclear Site Advanced Nuclear Reactor Technology Park,  Comment Period Ends: 04/04/2022, Contact: J. Taylor Johnson 423-571-2732.                

*EIS No. 20220017, Second Revised Draft, USACE, FL,*                     Lake Okeechobee Watershed Restoration Project Draft Revised Integrated Project Implementation Report and Environmental Impact Statement,  Comment Period Ends: 04/04/2022, Contact: Melissa Nasuti 904-232-1368.                

      ( print page 9346)    
Dated: February 14, 2022.

Cindy S. Barger,

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2022-03581 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46489

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

TIMOTHY WILLIAM SNOW ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: June 14, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Bradly S. Ford , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of thirteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of one and one

- half years, for sexual abuse of a child under sixteen, affirmed

.
Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Timothy William Snow pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under sixteen . I.C. § 18

-
1506

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court

sentenced Snow to a unifi ed term of thirteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of

one and one

- half years

. Snow appeals , arguing that his sentence is excessive

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to b e considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Snow ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.02

I, Danny L. Utz, Vice  President-Finance,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, (the  Report)  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  and (ii) the  information  contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of The Keller Manufacturing Company, Inc. as of the dates and for the
periods set forth therein.

| | /s/  Danny L. Utz
Danny L. Utz
Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o

l TH TER F:

p nd nt

T

)

)

)

)

)

)

-0 -2011-0 23

8: I,

-,---,-__ Da of -==d..:=~~:::" , 2012

fficer
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the original of the allaehed ORDER GRANTING

MOTION TO AMEND CONSENT AGREEM'ENT AND FINAL ORDER in the mailer of

EOG INC.; DOCKET NO.: CAA-08-2011-0023, the JOINT MOTION TO AMEND

ADM INSTRATI VE COMPLAINT AND CONSENT AGREEMENT was filed with the

Regional Hearing Clerk on June 15,2012; the FINAL ORDER waS filed on June 19,2012.

Further, the undersigned certifies that a tfUC and correCl copy ofthe docuJncnl was

delivered to David Rochlin, Senior Enforcement Anomey. U. S. EPA- Region 8,1595

Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129. True and correct copies of the aforementioned

documents were placed ill the United States mail and e-mailedonJuneI9.2012.to:

Edward Lewis

Folbright and Jaworski, LLP

1301 McKinney. Soite5100

Hooston, TX 77010-3095

elewis@fulbright.com

E-mailcd to:

cliZllbeth Whitsel

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Cincinnati Finance Center

26 W, Martin Luther King Drive (MS-0002)

Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

June 19,2012 'ifnLtlev t2dRJ!1A> . 'ina Artemis

Paralegal/Regionaillearing Clerk
Artea CHILTON v. STATE of Mississippi

2014-CT-00330-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 27, 2018 Closed: June 21, 2018

Certiorari - Denied.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 630 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban 

Indian organization confer policy for the Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2023 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban Indian organization confer policy for the 

Department of Health and Human Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Urban Indian Health 

5 Confer Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 630 IH

1 SEC. 2. URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATION CONFER POLICY. 

2 Section 514(b) of the Indian Health Care Improve3 ment Act (25 U.S.C. 1660d) is amended to read as fol4 lows: 

5 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall ensure 

6 that the Service and the other agencies and offices of the 

7 Department confer, to the maximum extent practicable, 

8 with urban Indian organizations in carrying out— 

9 ‘‘(1) this Act; and 

10 ‘‘(2) other provisions of law relating to Indian 

11 health care.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the quarterly report of RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip J. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  November 2, 2006 | /s/ Philip J. Hickey, Jr. |  
 

Philip J. Hickey, Jr.

 
 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

  |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TELIAX TECHNOLOGY LLC, TOLL

- FREE EXCHANGE, LLC, Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

AFFINITY NETWORK, INC., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2023

- 1197

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:22

- cv

- 00362

- CDS

- DJA

, Judge Cristina D. Silva.

______________________ O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 23-1197 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 03/15/2023T ELIAX T ECHNOLOGY LLC V

. A FFINITY N ETWORK , I NC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

March 15, 2023 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 15, 2023 Case: 23-1197 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 03/15/2023
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6356 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6356

To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to prohibit anchoring in certain locations of 
               the Hudson River, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2023

Mr. Ryan (for himself and Mr. Molinaro) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2021 to prohibit anchoring in certain locations of 
               the Hudson River, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hudson River Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. ANCHORAGES.

    Section 8437 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Public Law 116-283) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (d) and (e);
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Prohibition.--The Commandant shall prohibit any vessel 
anchoring on the reach of the Hudson River described in subsection (a) 
unless such anchoring is within anchorage grounds established before 
January 1, 2021.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Asomani WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-6921

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 25, 2017

Decided: May 5, 2017

Eugene Asomani Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Marc Birnbaum, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Julia K. Martinez, Rachel Elaine No-naka, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Asomani Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 *217U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny as moot Williams’ motion to place the appeal in abeyance pending a decision in *Beckles v. United States,*— U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145 (2017), and deny Williams’ motions for appointment of counsel and to supplement the opening informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Jimmy K. BONEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3803

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03052]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 11652]

Notice of Determinations; Additional Culturally Significant 
Object Being Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``The Language of 
Beauty in African Art'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: On December 16, 2021, notice was published on page 71313 of 
the Federal Register (volume 86, number 238) of determinations 
pertaining to certain objects to be included in an exhibition entitled 
``The Language of Beauty in African Art.'' Notice is hereby given of 
the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain 
additional object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement 
with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the 
aforesaid exhibition at the Art Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, 
Illinois; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that its 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-03052 Filed 2-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### Whitman Phillips, Respondent, *v.*Josiah G. Clark, Appellant.

Plaintiff and one S. were partners. Upon dissolution they entered into a written agreement, by which S. assigned and- transferred all his rights and interest in the assets of the firm to plaintiff, who was to collect all the accounts, etc., and pay the firm debts, and with the share of S. in the *678residue, and the avails of certain individual .property also transferred ,to pay certain paper made in the firm name by S. for his individual benefit; the balance, if any remained, to be paid to S. In an action brought by plaintiff to recover a debt due the *firm,—Held,*that S. was not a necessary party plaintiff.

(Submitted September 30, 1871;

decided January term, 1872.)

*J. F. Malcolm*for the appellant.

*Whiibeck c& Wcmdall*for the respondent.

Earl, C., reads for affirmance.

All concur. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### John Mainama OMARIBA Petitioner v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States Respondent

No. 16-1770

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 29, 2016

Filed: December 5, 2016

Shahzad Ghafoor, Ghafoor & Cook, Independence, MO, for Petitioner

Karen Yolanda Drummond, Carl H. McIntyre, Erik R. Quick, Katherine Ann Smith, Trial Attorneys, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

*916PER CURIAM.

John Mainama Omariba, a citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an immigration judge denying him withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture. After careful consideration, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the decision. See De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 379-82 (8th Cir. 2013). The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Thomas J. Baldwin, certifythat:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morton’s Restaurant Group,Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 17, 2004

 
|   | /s/  THOMAS J. BALDWIN   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas  J. Baldwin       |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----