AFS-10-363-E 

August 23, 2010 

 Exemption No. 8465C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-19881 

Mr. Edward J. Tarver III 

5155 Lake In The Woods 

Lakeland, FL 33813 

Dear Mr. Tarver: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8465, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated August 2, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for 

an extension of Exemption No. 8465, as amended. That exemption from § 91.109(a) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows you to conduct certain flight training 

in certain Beechcraft Bonanza/Debonair/Baron airplanes that are equipped with a functioning 

throwover control wheel. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8465, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions 

and limitations. 
 2

Conditions and Limitations 

 

1. Operations under this exemption are limited to flights 

for completion of the flight review 

 required by § 61.56 and for accomplishing recency of experience as required 

 by § 61.57. 

 2. Operations under this exemption are limited to Beech Bonanza/Debonair/Baron type 

 aircraft equipped with a functioning throwover control wheel and operable rudder 

 pedals, in lieu of functioning dual controls. 

 3. The pilot manipulating the controls under the terms of this exemption must be qualified 

 in every respect to serve as pilot in command (PIC) of the airplane during the entire 

 flight. While operating under this exemption, the pilot seated in the left seat must at all 

 times serve as and remain PIC as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. The PIC must agree to 

 the provisions of this exemption. 

 4. While serving as a flight instructor under the terms of this exemption, Mr. Tarver must: 

 a. Notwithstanding paragraph 4b below, be otherwise fully qualified to serve as PIC 

 and flight instructor in the airplane involved, as required by 14 CFR § 61.195(b) 

 and (f); and 

 b. Have given at least 25 hours of dual instruction in the airplane involved. 

 5. Mr. Tarver, when serving as the flight instructor under the conditions of this 

 exemption, and the PIC must agree that the proposed flight, under the conditions in 

 evidence at the time of proposed flight, can be conducted safely. 
 3

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8465, as amended, to 

December 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8465, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8465. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service