P. 1



# OAR Box 1338 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 9 ) ll-E-2 0
Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 6/17/2008 1:48:05PM

Sheet 9 of 105P. 2

•^ , (" ^ * 

# A-89-1 0

-. .'j. '

To :


### Fr : 

# ^ ogcici t LA W omct * PHILI PJ . HARTE K

SUIT B 40 4 130 1 M STREET, N.W . WASHINGTON
. D. C 3009 7 

### II-E-2 0

(202 ) 687-I0t 3 rAX i iZOll ••7.103 8

Apri l 4,199 0 

## MEMORANDU M

EP A Negotiated Rulemakin

g Committe

e o n Fugitiv e Emission

s fro m Equipmen

tLeak s an d Intereste

d Partie s Phili p J . Hartc r Facilitator Re : Minute

s o f Marc h 27-28 Meeting ; Futur

e Meeting ; Batc

h Workgrou

p Meeting

I enclos e th

e minute s o f th e Marc h 27-23 meetin

g tha twer e prepare d b y Radia n Corporation. A s before , the material

s tha twere distribute

d a tth e meetin g ar c attached . A s o

f the moment

, I woul d expec tth e agend afo rth e meetin g would ver

y muc h resemble th

e one distribute

d a tth e las tmeeting wit

h adea rempha

si s o n th e standar d an d th e "ancillary " factors . Withi n that , we o f course need t

o develo p a

n approac h fo r pumps, flanges , an

d otherthing

s tha thav e notbee n discusse d as muc h a s valves . I hop e to hav e abelterfeel fo rspecific items an

d henc e abelterestimat

e o f a n actua l agend ai n alittle while ; i

f so , 1 wil l distribut e a mor e detailed agend

abefore the meeting . Th e Batc h Processing workgrou

p wil l mee ta t1:3 0 on Apri l 24 a tthe Pharmaceutica

l Manufacturer

s Association , 1100 Fifteent h Stree tNW, Washington

, DC . A s always , all Committe e member

s an d thei r designees ar

c welcome . The nex tmeeting will be on Apri l 25-2 6 a tThe Conservatio

n Foundation, Suit

e 500,125 0 24t

h Stree t NW , Washington, DC ; th

e phon e numbe ra tC F i s 202*293-4800 . Sinc

e we wil l no tb e meeting a

tahotel , w

e hav e no tbooked an

y rooms forthis meeting . T o facilitat e you rfinding CF an

d a n appropriat

e hotel , I enclos e ama p indicatin

g CF s location (iti s two block s du e nort h o f the Bristo

l Hotel wher

e w e me ti n February

) an d alisto f hotel s i n th o area. Sinc

e tha ti s "Eart h Week" , yo

u ma y b e well advised t

o mak e you rreservatio

n early . Th e meeting wil

l begin a t10:0 0 o n the firs

tda y an d 9:0 0 on the second . The

y will ru n unti l abou t5:0 0 o n th e fus tda y an d abou t4:00 on the second . Recal l tha tth e Organizationa

l Protocols provid

e tha t'Unles s extended b

y th e Committee , the deadline fo rth e negotiation

s i s Apri l 30 , 1990. " Thus , w e need t o tr y t o reac h aconceptua

l agreemen

ta tthis meeting . Therefore , iti s importan ttha tal l committee member

s pla n to sta y fo rth e whole tim

e - thing s ofte n gethair y a tth e end . W e have schedule

d ameeting forJun e 6-7 . A s w e discusse d a tthe meeting , itwill b e a tthe Compr

i Hotel , 4620 S . Miam

i Boulevard , Morrisvillc N C 27S60 ; 919-941-606*5. I ti s locate d jus tof f exit28 1 o

n 1-4 0 whic h i s ih e second exitfro

m the airpor

ton the wa

y t o Durham. A bloc

ko f rooms has been reserved . Whe n callin g fo rreservations , pleas e identif y yoursel f a s being wit

h "EP A Fugitives" .P. 3

LA W owfiett PHILI PJ . BARTE R

•UIT K40 4 330 1 M tTfttCT
. N.W
. WA8HIN0T0N
. D.C
. 2003 7 (202 ) «87at03 3 FAX i U02 ) 887.103 « Apri l 11 , 199 0



# IMPORTAN T NOTICE! !

Th e meetin g schedule d fo rApri l 2 5 an d 2 6 ha s bee n canceled . I tha s bee n reschedule d fo rMay 1 0 and 11 . Th e meetin g wil l b e hel d atth e Conservatio n Foundation ; Suit e 500 ; 125 0 24t h Street , N.W. ; Washington , D C 20037 ; 202-2934800 . Unfortunately , th e Conservatio n Foundatio n wil l b e holdin g ameetin g b th e conferenc e roo m unli t10:0 0 o n Ma y 10 . Ourmeetin g wil l therefor e startat10:30 . Becaus e C F i s afunctionin g organizatio n an d its meetin g roo m wil l b e occupied , pleas e d o no tarriv e ther e until jus tbefor e 10:30 . M y offic e i s on e bloc kawa y (a tth e corne ro f 23r d an d M) , an d I woul d welcom e anyon e wh o want s aplac e t o perc h fo rawhile : com e joi n m c fo rcoffe e and croissant s befor e th e meeting . I als o hav e som e spar e room s (ihe y aren' tlarg e and the y lack furniture sinc e the y wer e occupie d b y afir m thatleft ) i n cas e som e group s woul d lik e t o mee tbeforehand . In addition , becaus e w e wil l b e abi ttardy i n startin g an d wil l b e meetin g o n Friday s o thatw e wil l likel y los e som e peopl e early , w e shoul d pla n o n goin g lai c o n Thursday , Ma y 1 0 an d startin g earl y o n Ma y 11 . Th e Batch Processin g Workgrou p wil l mee ta s originall y schedule d at1:3 0 o n Apri l 2 4 atth e Pharmaceuti cal Manufacturer s Association , 110 0 Fifteenth Stree tNW , Washington , DC . Tha twil l afford di e Workgrou p enoug h tim e t o prepar e material s fo rsubmittal t o th e full committe e a tth e newl y schedule d Ma y meeting .P. 4

LA W OFFICE S PHILI P J

. HARTE R

SUIT E 40 4 230 1 M STREET
. N
. W
. WASHINGTON , D.C
. 2003 7 (202 ) 887.103 3 FAX : (202 ) 887.103 6

Apri l 4 , 199

0 

# MEMORANDU M

To : EP A Negotiate dRulemaking Committe e o n Fugitiv e Emission s fro mEquipment

Leaks andIntereste dPartie s Fr : Phili

p J

. Harte r Facilitator 

# e4

Re : Minute s o

f March27-2 8 Meeting ; Future Meeting ; Batc hWorkgrou

p Meetin g

I enclos e th e minute s o

f th e March27-2 8 meetin g tha t were prepare dby Radia n Corporation

. A s before , th e material s tha

t were distribute da

t th e meetin g ar e attached

. A s o f th e moment , I wouldexpect th e agendafo r th e meetin g wouldver

y muc hresembl e th e one distribute da t th e las t meeting wit

haclea r empha

si s on th e standardandth e "ancillary " factors

. Withi n that , w e o

f cours e nee dt o develo p a n approac hfo

r pumps , flanges , andother

thing s tha

t hav e not bee n discusseda s muc

ha s valves

. I hop e t o hav e abette r fee l fo r specifi c item s andhenc e abette r estimate o

f a n actual agend ai

n alittl e while ; i

f so , I wil l distribute a mor e detaile dagend abefore th e meeting

. The BatchProcessing workgroup wil l meet at 1:30 on Apri l 2

4 a t th e Pharmaceutica

l Manufacturer s Association , 110

0 Fifteent hStreet NW , Washington , DC ; th e phon e number at C Fi s 202-293-4800

. A s always , all Committe e member s an dtheir designee s ar e welcome

. Th e nex t meetin g wil

l b e on Apri l 25-2 6 at

Th e Conservatio n Foundation , Suit e 500 , 125 0 24t

hStreet NW, Washington , DC

. Sinc e we wil l no t b e meetin g a

t ahotel , w e hav e no t

booke dan

y room s fo

r thi s meeting

. T o facilitat

e you r findin g C Fanda

n appropriate hotel , I enclos e ama p indicating CF s locatio n (it i s tw o blocks du e nort

ho f th e Bristo l Hote l where w e me t i n February ) andalis t

o f hotel s i n th e area . Since tha t i s "Eart hWeek" , you ma

y b e well advise dt o mak

e your reservatio n early

. The meetin g wil

l begin at 10:0 0 o n th e first da y and9:0 0 o n th e second

. They wil

l run unti l abou t

5:0 0 o n th e first da y an dabou t

4:00 on th e second

. Recal l tha t th e Organizationa

l Protocol s provide tha

t "Unles s extende db y th e Committee , th e deadlin e fo r th e negotiation s i s Apri l 30 , 1990. " Thus , w e need^to tr y to reac haconceptua

l agreement

at thi s meeting

. Therefore , it i s important

tha t all committe e member s pla n t o sta y fo r th e whol e tim

e - thing s ofte

n get hair y at th e end

. W e hav e schedule dameetin g fo r Jun e 6-7 . A s w e discussedat th e meeting , it

wil l b e a t th e Compr

i Hotel , 4620 S

. Miam

i Boulevard , Morrisvill e N C 27560 ; 919-941-6066

. I t i s locate djus t

of f exit 28 1 on 1-4

0 whic hi s th e secondexit

fro mth e airpor

t on th e wa

y t o Durham

. A block

o f room s ha s bee n reserved

. Whe n calling fo r reservations , pleas e identif y yourself a s bein g wit

h"EP A Fugitives"

.P. 5 

# i

Th e Conservation Foundation

Th e Conser v Foundatio n

T o Georgeto v

a > w C O £
C M

, ' (

atio n 

## " ^ 1

i m24thStreet

V

i23rdStreet

/ashing t /22ndStreet

o n Cir c

Fogg y / M e Bot tr o tor n P Stree t

OS t ree t

/ / 

# 7

• 

## "^22 ^21stStreet

**v e 

# /M

N Stree t

M Stree t

© C O 5 a L Stree t

KStree t

1 Stree t " A Oupon t Circl e 

# ^K
. 

# 1 Dupon t Circl e •***!? « Metr o Iv^ ^
\ TS?4 I 

### \ ^Cj V

\ 

# Y19thStreet18thStreet17thStreet

125 0 Twenty-fourt h Street , N W Washington . D C 2003 7 US A 202/293-480 0 Telex : 6450 5 PAND A Affiliated with Wbrld

Wildlife FundP. 6

•i. 

# A
Th e Conservation Foundation Septembe r 198 9 Hotel s nea r Th e Conservatio n Foundation' s Office s
Carlyl e Suite s Hote l 173 1 Ne w Hampshir e Avenue , N W 202/234-320 0 (10-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $6 9 (mentio n C F o r WW F whe n calling ) Dupon t Plaz a Hote l 150 0 Ne w Hampshir e Avenue , NW 202/483-600 0 (7-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $125-$14 5 Governmen t Rate : $78-$9 8 Embass ySquar e Suite s (Qualit yInn ) 200 0 NStreet , N

W 202/659-900 0 (4-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $110-12 5 - including continenta l breakfas t Governmen t Rate : $7 8 (mentio n C F o r WW F whe n calling ) Embass ySuite s 125 0 22n

d Street , N

W 202/857-338 8 (1-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $16 4 including full-breakfas t an d "happy-hour " Governmen t Rate : $87-$13 9 Hampshir e Hote l 131 0 Ne w Hampshir e Avenue , N W 202/296-760 0 (4-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $9 0 (mentio n CF' s nam e whe n calling ) Governmen t Rate : $7 5 On e Washingto n Circl e 1 Washingto n Circle , NW 202/872-168 0 (4-bloc k wal k t o th e office ) Rate : $99-$15 0 Governmen t Rate : $7 8

125 0 Twenty-Rjurt

h Stree tN W Washington , D C 2003 7 US A 202/293-480 0 Telex : 6450 5 PAND A

Affiliated with World

Wildlife FundP. 7

*



### Ramad a Renaissanc e . _ 114 3 Ne w Hampshir e Avenue , N W 202/775-080 0 (4-bloc k wal k t o th

e office ) Rate : $150-$15 5 Governmen t Rate : St . Jame s Hote l 95 0 24thStreet , N

W 202/457-050 0 (3-bloc k wal k t o th

e office ) Rate : $11 5 includin g continenta l breakfas t (two-nigh t minimu

m stay ) Governmen t Rate : $77.2 5 .. . Tabar d In n 173 9 N Street , N

W 202/785-127 7 (7-bloc k wal k t o th

e office ) Rates : $79-9 9 includin g breakfas t Washingto

nMarriot t 122 1 Twenty-Secon

d Street , N

W 202/872-150 0 (2-bloc k wal k t o th

e office ) Rate : $16 5 Governmen t Rate : $8 5 Westi nHote l M an d 24thStreets , N

W 202/429-240 0 (Next-doo

r t o th e office ) Rates : $165-19 5 Governmen t Rate : $11 0P. 8 it

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y ! ^W* 7 3 0ff| c e o f Ai rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s \<*\\(+j

Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1

" ' DBQlt ^

Apri l 10 , 199 0



### Dea r Re g Ne g Committe e Member : A t th e las t Re g Ne g meeting , it wa s requeste dtha t w e provid e a write-u p describin g th e revision s tha t w e hav e mad e t o th e databas e a s presente db y Rober t Panel-Short . Hi s presentatio ni s Attachmen t 7 o f th e Meetin g Minutes . Thi s lette r describe s th e tw o refinement s w e hav e mad e t o th e previou s versio n(2/14/90 ) o f th e ethylen e oxid e (EO ) an d butadien e (BD ) databases . First , w e hav e identifie dsevera l screenin g value s tha t shoul dhav e bee n marke da s "pegged" , bu t wer e not . We identifie dthes e b y revie w o f th e ra

w data , an

d comparin g them

wit hth e computerize ddatabases . Thes e correction s had1ittl e impact . Th e secondan

d mor e significan t chang e i s relate dt o th e emissio n factor s use dwit hscreenin g value s greate r tha n10,00 0 ppm . I nth e origina l CM A reportin g o f th e E O an d B D dat a an

d i nth e 2/14/9 0 database , th e SOCM I lea k factor s wer e use dfo r al l screenin g value s greate r tha no r equa l t o 10,00 0 ppm . Thi s wa s don e becaus e th e dat a a t a majorit y o f th e plant s include dvalue s wher e th e screenin g instrumen t wa s "pegged " a t 10,00 0 ppm . Sinc e th e SOCM I lea k factor s wer e derive dfro m plant s wit hhighe r lea k frequencies , thi s facto r ver y likel y overstate s th e emission s fro m component s a t th e E 0 an

d B D plant s which , a s a group , hav e muc hlowe r lea k frequencies . Therefore , fo r th e plant s wher e screenin g value s wer e equa l t o o r greate r tha n 10,00 0 pp

m an d wer e no t pegged , w e recalculate demission s from th e correlatio n curve . Also , w e use dthes e dat a t o deriv e a ne w lea k facto r an

d applie dit , instea do f th e SOCM I lea k factor , t o thos e component s screene da s bein g pegged . Thi s result s i nlea k factor s tha t ar e lowe r fo r al l components , excep t flanges . Inaddition , w e considere dhow dat a woul db e generate da t plant s tha t wil l b e subjec t t o th e standar di nth e future . I t i s reasonabl e t o expect , a t plant s tha t ar e runnin g LDA Rprograms , tha t th e screenin g dat a collecte di n th e LDA Rprogram s wil l b e use dt o estimat e emissions . However , i t appear s tha t thi s approach , alon g wit hcurrentl y availabl e emissio nfactors , ma y overstat e emissions . Th e reaso ni s tha t screenin g value s i nLDA Rprogram s ar e obtaine dbefor e repair s ar e made . Sinc e repair s ar e mad e immediatel y afte r th e screening , th e before-repai r reading s overstat e averag e emission s fo r th e period . Fo r example , i f reading s an d repair s ar e mad e a t th e end o f th e quarter , a t da y

90 , th e emissio nestimate s wil l represen t th e emission s o nda y 90 . Onda y

91 , emission s wil l b e lowe r du e t o th e repairs . Emission s wil lP. 9



### increas e ove r time unti l th e nex t roundo f screening s an drepairs , whic hwoul d occu r o nda y 18 0 i na quarterl y

program . Averag e emission s wil l depen do nth e progressio no f leak s durin g th e quarter . However , it seem s reasonabl e t o assume tha t th e emission s correspon dapproximatel y t o th e averag e o f befor e an dafter-repai r screenin g values . T o examin e th e effec t o f this , we looke da t th e E O an dB D data . Sinc e we hav e no after-repai r data , we hadt o estimat e th e effec t o f repair . Severa l option s wer e possible . On e i s t o assume repaire dcomponent s hav e no detectabl e emissions . Anothe r i s t o assume tha t component s ar e repaire dt o jus t belo w

th e lea k definition . A third , an

dth e on e w e used , i s t o assume tha t th e distributio no f emissio nrate s amon g repairedcomponent s mirror s th e distributio namon g non-leakin g components . Robert' s las t 2 overhead s illustrate dthi s result . Thi s seem s reasonable , give ntha t repaire d component s woul dexhibi t variatio ni nthei r degre e o f repai r dependin g o nth e component' s physica l condition . Base donou r assumptio ntha t th e repaire dcomponent s emi t a t th e same rat e a s th e averag e non-leakin g components , w e ca ncalculat e a nafter-repai r emissio nfactor . W e coul dthe naverag e th e before-repai r factor s tha t wer e calculate ddirectl y

from th e E O an

dB D data , wit hth e after-repai r factor s t o determin e a

nestimat e o f wha t averag e emission s ove r th e quarte r woul dbe . We believ e thi s i s a reasonabl e approac hfo r estimatin g th e averag e emission s fo r a uni t tha t i s meetin g a specifie dpercen t lea k level . I f yo uhav e any

questions , o r woul dlik e a copy o f th e update ddatabas e pleas e cal l m e a t (919 ) 541-5262 . Sincerely ,

Ric k Colye r Standard s Developmen t Branc h

cc : Intereste dpartie sP.1 0



### REGULATOR YNEGOTIATIO N MEETINGON

FUGITIV E EQUIPMEN T LEAK S MARC H 27-28 , 199 0 PICKET T SUITE S HOTE L DURHAM , NORT H CAROLIN A DRAF T MEETINGMINUTE S

Thes e meetin g note s summariz e issue s discusse dan dprovid e a

ninforma l recor do f administrativ e an dlogistica l decision s mad e o nschedule s an dactio n items . Al l presentatio nmaterial s distribute ddurin g th e two-da y meetin g ar e attached : Attachmen t 1 Attachmen t 2 Attachmen t 3 Attachmen t 4 Attachmen t 5 Attachmen t Attachmen t Attachmen t Attachmen t Attachmen t Attachmen t 6

7 8 9 1 0 1 1 Meetin g Agend a Attendee s Marc h27 , 199 0 Copy o f Agreemen t reache ddurin g Woodstove s Re g Ne g Revision s t o Februar y 22-2 3 meetin g note s D e Minimi s cutoff : Presentatio nb y Larr y Goodhear t (API ) Correlatio no f Emissio nFactor s vs . % Leaker s Revise dEmissio nFactor s CM A Conceptua l Approac ht o th e Standar dfo r Valve s Flanges : Presentatio nb y RonBerglun d(Unio nCarbide ) Dua l Mechanica l Sea l Cos t Informatio n Respons e Facto r Dat a
Administrativ e Not e

Mr . Phi l Harte r tol dth e Regulator y Negotiatio nCommitte e member s tha t th e writte nagreemen t drafte dfo r th e Woodstove s regulator y negotiatio nprovide s a goo dexampl e o f th e forma t an dtex t tha t ma y b e use dt o draf t th e equipmen t leak s Re g Ne g agreement . H e urge dcommitte e member s t o familiariz e themselve s wit hth e Woodstove s agreement . A copy o f th e agreemen t i s containe din Attachmen t 3 . Minute s o f Previou s Meetin g

Th e minute s o f th e previou s ful l committe e meetin g (Februar y 22 - 23 , 1990 ) wer e discussed . Change s inth e minute s submitte db y Ms . Kare nFidle r o f CM

A an dMs . Elle nSiegle r o f AP I ar e containe di n Attachmen t 4 . Scop e o f th e Standar d

Mr . Larr y

Goodheart , representin g API , reporte dtha t AP I i s awaitin g dat a fro

m severa l benzene/toluene/xylen e (BTX ) facilitie s tha t ma y impac t th e scop e o f th e equipmen t leak s standard . H e requeste da dela y

i nth e discussio no f th e scop e o f th e standar d unti l AP I receive s thos e data .

cao.027 aP.1 1



### Mr . Jac k Kac e o f th e Pharmaceutica l Manufacturer s Associatio n aske dMr . Bo bAja xo f EPA whethe r enduser s o f th e chemical s expecte dt o be liste da s hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAPs ) i nth e propose dClea nAi r Ac t (CAA ) amendment s wil l b e subjec t t o th e standard . Mr . Aja xresponde dtha t th e negotiate dstandar dwil l appl y t o producer s an

dintermediat e user s o f HAPs . Mr . Goodhear t initiate da discussio no f a d e minimi s stream concentratio ncutof f below whic hequipmen t woul db e exemp t fro m th e negotiate dstandard . Usin g equipmen t an demission s informatio nfro

m a BT Xplan t (se e Attachmen t 5) , h e reporte dtha t a majorit y

o f th e BT Xemission s woul dbe capture db y controllin g equipmen t containin g greate r tha n2 0 percen t BT Xinth e line . I n addition , h e indicate dtha t a significan t numbe r o f equipmen t component s a t th e BT Xplan t contai nles s tha n1 0 percen t BT Xi n th e line . Mr . Goodhear t presente dcos t projection s tha t indicate d prohibitiv e cost s associate dwit hcontrollin g BT Xemission s fro m equipmen t containin g les s tha n2 0 percen t BT Xi nth e line . Base d o nthes e estimates , he suggeste da d e minimi s stream concentratio n o f 20 percent . Mr . Aja xquestione dth e cos t informatio nan d offere dt o examin e cos t dat a ingreate r detail . H e reiterate dhi s concer nfro

m th e Februar y

meetin g tha t lowe r concentratio nstream s dominat e th e equipmen t lea k emission s inventor y a s tighte r control s ar e place do nhighe r concentratio nstreams . H e state d tha t EPA wil l examin e th e d e minimi s cutof f issu e ingreate r detai l befor e th e nex t meeting . Data/Emissio nFactor s

Mr . Aja xexpresse dEPA' s interes t i nimprove dequipmen t lea k emissio nfactor s an

dscreenin g value/lea k rat e correlations . Revise demissio nestimatio nmethodologie s wil l b e usefu l bot hfo r estimatin g environmenta l impact s unde r th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) an

dfo r calculatin g residua l ris k severa l year s afte r promulgatio no f th e standard . H e note dtha t n o on e o nth e committe e ha s provide dinformatio nonth e program s tha t ar e underwa y t o collec t dat a an

dtha t effort s EPA

i s awar e o f t o collec t additiona l screenin g an dbaggin g dat a hav e bee nslow an d ar e expecte dt o tak e longe r tha nth e negotiations . Therefore , he suggeste dtha t th e revisio no f emissio nestimatio nmethodologie s shoul dno t be include da s a nactivit y

i nth e negotiation . Mr . Tom Kittleman , representin g CMA , agree dtha t time constraint s prohibi t revisio no f emissio nestimatio nmethodologie s a s par t o f th e Re g Neg . Some committe e member s aske dabou t th e methodolog y EPA expect s t o us e inrevisin g th e emissio nestimatio n methodologie s onc e ne w baggin g dat a ar e available . Mr . Aja xsai d tha t EP A woul dwor k wit hindustr y t o revis e th e EP A

Protoco l fo r Generatin g Unit-Specifi c Emissio nEstimate s fro m Equipmen t Leak s o f VO C an

dVHA P o r publis ha simila r document .

cao.027 a—'•
—O - h 3
-•• - 3 O - J 3 0 -i

• -••Oft ) c f O < 7 *

. Q ft) -• • TJC-T t T 3 ft) <

c f 3 3 Tro — ' -« ; < c f C

O (T > ro 3

— < -1.--
. ft) j » ro —

•0 3 C J
. a> * < ro u ^ ro - o X —

< - 1 0
. ro 3 > ro

. 0 ro eu

c-» - t o C - h ?r

c f ro ro -a - ft) 3 c o 3 a . 0 c-t

c f -a - ro 3 " ro - • •c-t- c f 3 Q
. 0 -• - ro ro 3 0 0 3 0 ro 3 c-t

- c-t - 3 O
. -" •3 > ft) O C

O - 3 - 3 3 — ' C

O 0 0
. « ft) 0 0 ) 3 O 3 O
. - O 3 3 > -t , 3 " O 0 -• •- j a * ro

— i < ro 0 - o ro - 0 ro c f - t , 0 » C O - O -• •C*

> ft)

- s ro - j —

•

- j 0 < 0 *-*

-t , ft> R » ro r - - 0

— ' 3 O rf O < c-t - 3 » 3 - 1 ro 3 0 ro 0 C O ft) «~ - ft)

— » o » 0 O —'- O T 3 3 - O O 1 " O C -ft O - I c f

— ' ft) U 3 O O Q
. CT- $ ft)

- ^ ft) O c f crr o 3 3 - 3 - ro ro — ' £ — 3 " ro —•

•c o 1 0 -< •ft) c f c f I Q 7« r 3 " O " ft) 3 * ro ft) 3 ro - * &) c

o o .

- 1 c o ro a

> cx- s 0
. O O ~ I T J 0 < ro -i 3 ro 1 0 0 Sltlr t -• •ro 0 ro c-t - 3 3 0 c-t-"C J Q - c f ro 3 - ro ro c u o . c o c o 0 C O -• - c-t- C O I M 3 " - J ro w0

- h Q
. c f ro a > -

- J c-t- 0 c o 3 - ft) Ct " C f T |

3 " 3 " -• • ro ro 3

- J ft) ro 0 —

• cT&*< ~i ro cu C ft)

3 -i C Q ro ro o > 3 c o ro 0 -i 3 -• • o > 0

- 3 3 " C T ro ro tu 3 a . ro = 3 X c o ro XJ tu 3 - I -• 1 c-t - ro 3--a.r o C-t

- ro C O C O a> 3 ro u n ni a ro 0 0 0 - 3- 5 ro rt- 0 -• • ro 3 - ro ro 3 ro - 1 c

o 3 3 3 " C

O c f o o > 3 -

- 5 - 5 ft) ft) ro c o 0 " c-t3 - 0

- h ro tz

0 -" > C O C f ft) ro c-t - 3 JZ> 3" 3 c - 0 o > 0 ro ro - J c-t

3 3 C

O r f ft) 3 - 3

— •ro 3 c-f o ro 0 < < ro c-t

3 3 -• •Q
. ft) c f C + -" •— " 3 - O c o ri - ro

- 5 O -• • -< •c ro c

o 3 c o c o c-tc a c o o > •ro 3 3 C-l " C O

< < 3 ro — ' C

O « < c f a> C O 3 o . ro - j •—

•- s -••-t o ro v o ro o . - n (U -. . C O -f j O a—

a -ft rt- - j 0 ro 0 —

• c 0 3 0 ro c o c-t - 3 3 - 0 c o -« •ro ro c-t

-
_. . < 3 3 _, . 3 ro o . -< •3 ( Q 3 ro r > ( Q •ro C L ft> C O —a 3 c o c + c o cu

—t 3 - X C-l - Q
. 3 " Q
. ft) —l-a
. 1 ft»
- • •~i -• •ro c-«

- -• •3

- i c-t - c o e 3 o . o . ro n - c-t

- 3 ta ro -t , t u a . 3 0 < « < c u 0

— ' - 1 0 < ro 3 ro c o n 3 c ro

— •- 5 C O rt- 3 3 - O -• •c f C 3 3 "

— ' tu c f - 1

C O 3 - n - -• • » - J 3 - ro

3 ro o . ft> 3 - -• ••0 ro 3 0 -< •3 - t u 0 3 -• • c c + 3 ro

- s -« •3 c f < tU ( Q l Q O -a - 3 - ft) 3 3 - ro 3 rt-

ro 0 - 0
. — ' o » * < -i a. c f 0 - u x aarft o ->• o < c r - J ro ro c o 3 - J 0
—* 0 3 - -t , ro 3 - c r 0 C O 1 -• •ro 0 — • 3 0 ) c-t - o> 3

— •ro - • •c-t- 3 3 -" •c f c-» - ro O C O " O -I rt- -f t O 3 " O < a . c u o . ro -1 ->• * < ft)
•0 - - * CO

c o c o —• • « < crarf o 0 ro • c-t3 - ft) 3 3

3 ro c o a . ro 3 o ) T S - E

- j • -i —• -> • O
. ft) c f 3 3 " 3 > c-t - c-l - -> • C J
. ft) X O C

O 3 •» . c

o ro C O 3 - J
. c i - O O ft) X — ' -a . C O r > 3 0 ft) 3"< < ro 3 - J -a . 0 ) O C O ft) c

— J — J c o c f

. — J
- 3 ft) 3 Q . - rf

—• ro - 0 ro c-t - c o ro - J 3 - ->• ^0 0 ft) 3 C

O - 0 0 c-l - -a - 0 3 ft) C O •

c o 3 c f - J ft) • 3 r+Q. ^ -t> -

- s J U _. .

- S r f O 3 " Q
. c f 3 ro t u ro X —'" O
-• •~i 3 ro _• . 0 0 C f C O ro ro — J

- h ro O 3

- 5 ft) 3 < ft) 3 "

_ J ^

. < ( Q ro 3 - Q
. Q
. C

O — ' 3 0 c 0 3 3 0 - 0 ro ro

- j - s 3 0

- h ft) —a.

C f I Q 3 " 3 - ft) c f c f ro C L c f 3 " C O ro 0 3 0 - 0 ro n 0 3 - c ro c f

— ' C L C

O c-t- 3 0 o » ro ro - 5 0 - 1 -t > o . 0 3 —i. —* 3 c-t- 3 O _• . O -< •J > c-l c-t - c + 5 » ro c + C f -" •O -a . C f

0 3 - O ) ro

_ j - o > T 3 T 3

- s - 0 ro 3 - 0 o » 3 - 0 -i ro ro 3 3 3

ro 0 3 0 0 3 —

< ro 3 -t > 0
. 0 3 ro 3< Q 0 - 3 ro « < ro 0 3 > 3 -IOC ) cf-—
. rt

0 ro - a C O - j C O -a . ro o > C O c f ro c f 3 C O 3 —|V I 2 0 I D ( Q •3 > 0 - - I -• •0 c o c o c o ro ro 3 «/» — i ro c o 0 ro — • ft) c o — •0 c f O

- t > s c 0 -t > c u ft) -• •Q
. 3 0

- 5 c o ro 0
. - s ro •

* ft> c u c f 3 " — • 3 - 0 ro —

• tu 0 C f C

O c f O

3 O 3 - h
c f c f c f 3 " ro ro ro 0 3 - 0 ft) 3 C O 0 ro c r - j ro s ro c o 3 - f » Q - " 5 -a . O c o 3 0 c 0 c o 3 C O J > ^
. 3 ft) C I O U 1 0 C O c f -• • ft) 3 3 ( Q O
. ft) •0

f Zrtrt3 - roquipmentLe o < * r c o 0 0 c f ft) 3 Q L ft)

- J C L m - i a m c

- 0 ro «i » . 0 c

o 3>. o c o c ro -f i - h 3 -• •^ - 3 > ft) ro - 0 -< •-> •

a>ft>ft>SOc-t-33ft>3 3

— •O -- •O - c f Q
. -" •3"- 0 T 3 •cro-a-Q-cfcf3ooe » ioroft» n ro 0.- 0 c o 3 0 r f 0 ro - J ro 3 3 Q
. c f 3 c f 0 Ocf-soocrco—' o 0

rt-IlfDOJC-i-i cf < 3"C03 O 3 Cf O Ui (A -•• tu ft)-S"OroO)33- 3 cfft)3ft)T33Q
. OOt Q -ir><f3rf---fi-S-f , cu 3-—'Q.c-t-rororo < roft)c-i- < f _• . at -1. 3 " C

O O a 3 O c f 3 " s c o o > -* , ro —'ft * c o — » ro c f 0 3 - ro ~i 7T

->• -a - 3 C

O ro 0 3 T J ro 0 -t > ro 3-EO--i"Ocf^-.- 5 ro c-i-r o a. a>

a> (Dft>-^oocomro 3 c f c f C

O c f - s - 5 o . -% at 0 -c o -• - ro3-cfo-3- ro->-o)a> —'C3>cc o 3 0 ft> < < a . 3 OcfOOcfc f C O -< •C

O o . = r ft) c f ro c

o - h -a-- o - a -•• 0 ) 0 o . m O C U _i
. -1
. — a ft»3-*30 x — •o > - 0 — '3-jo«<coou3roro3 •OO-JJx O 3 O-a - CO S —'( Q Q
. •

3

- I J > C-l
. ft) X CO c f ft) c f ro a . c f 3 - a> c f m

- 0 (Qro O -tj C —'r + ( D r + -ti > O)^ * rf»<X3ro-I-5-'-3- 3 tu 3 O ft) ^- ^ c f c o : x ro -• •ro ro c

o 0 ro c f 3 T 3 -< • 3 > - J 3 0 c f ro o

> -< •COOOcfrocf—< o 3 - ocorocf3ro-" - rorocfft) c c + 3 -> •c

o ro c o Q
. & > 0 c f -..-• •3 0 co o ^-- 1 — ' 3 W ( I f+ t •- S ft) C O O O -••t o c o c f 3 - -• •ro Q
. ro X 3 -a-roroc f ro 3 c o -f , cu romoco-js-—1 3 ro c f 0 -+,cfC0cfQ--O 3 3 - -« •ft p 1 ft> ro ro r f O 3 3>C 0 -t,C O C O -< - 3 3- 3 0 - •ooncocQoo.r o 3-3-cfro^r o TC I Q
. ft) C O ro 3 ro 3 ro a . < 3 3 -a . ro c f - 1 - 5 c-t - ro 0 3 - - J < 3 0 *
—-a - 3 C L •c o ro 0 ro 3

— •Q
. r f O ft) ( Q 3 ro — ' « < - J 3 T 3 C

O 3

- s cn c o - 0 ro O -< - ft) C O 0 0 0 ro o . 3 c f 3 3 " C

O < f ro -t , ro c u ft> 0 Q
. - J 0 -t
. c f c f O " O c f * < " 5 3 - c o ro 3 -iro3o.o-ic f 3_i
. —jcf o ro ro ft> —iQ.-i - -JC03"3-ro3cfcf O 3 •droroco-j-3-ojiQcft ) -a - •3 O * < 3 c f -rjo-5-» - ( Q a-l i Q--< - ft>3ro3 0-$f,fD 3 3 - w o x - '

0 0 -^ ta ro-t,eft)— •

tu

0 3 1

— •ft> — •0 c o —'o a c f ro 1 nr*c*OC*<lt TT 3 oocf-" - -r o cfroro < 3-03 0 C

O — . 3 " < -• • O - S I Q - D r f -••« < -• •OZ -i -JC O 3"= 3 —'COO O c f « ipnmt30(D-''Z 3 3 0 ro — ' 3 3 •3 0 ->-33<Qcro< a ro 03co-oroiQO - 3 e-*coorfrorooro3r f

— ••-«-33-a.a.xx-sft ) o . 0 ro 0 = _•-_•. . —1 J > 3 3 a . -• •Q
. c o crcj
. c f 0 eu 3 ro c f zo ro c u —

•c f -• •0 x 0 .—. 3 0 "

<Q mif l ro • < 0 - j

— •c f 3 3 ro Q
. c o 3 - O

- J c f 1 c f ro

- 5 3 ft) —. c f ro

- 5 3 tu c f —». < ro c o

- h O

- J J D

C •

3 0 c f - I 3 ro 3 - ro - v ft) l Q ft) < • 3 c f « a C f -a Z c o 3 > ro ro -• •—

> r f u a x > 0 —

< & > c f

- ^ < ro

. c 3 ro C O -a - C

O 3 -• •< 3 ft) « ZTZ 0 —' 0 ro ro ro c - s 3 —"C O ro 0 C L 3 -

. 0 ro ^ ~ C T 3 0

—Q
. - $ S < _• . 0 -• • ft) C O 3 " c f
— . O -" •N itct r 3 C O ->• ft) O C O c f C O ro ->• *• 0 ft* ro £ 3 I Q Q
. - • •C O - I —J ro -• •

— ' c o ro -ty 3 " 3 T 3 O «!

> T 3

- I C 3 O O — ' r f C

O O " Q
. c f ft) O T 3 O " C T3 0 —'«! > 3 " < ro ro ft)
. 0 3 0-0- c ro ro —•-< •3 ro < c f 3 ft> O c f — •0

- j 0 ro - n ro 3 0 0 ro r > 0 ro 3 0 3 •->• 3 C f C

O 0 -• •C

O ro 3 3 -• • T 3 c - 1 0 r f ro •3 c ft) e J > -t ,

— •3 t->
. « u Q
. ft) 0 c f ro x < f 3 - - j 0 ft) -f a " I 3 c f ro 3 - — • ro c f

toC O o c C O C O ro Q
. tu CO T S o C O CO C T3

ro C O

o -i £ o

- J ft) C X ro C O c f ft) 3 a . ft)

- I O - co —•< < C O ro ro o ft) B > - j * - - j ro c o ro Q
. 3 ro 3 -) • f,-a - 3 -•.( O < Q 3 3 - - • •c f - h c f O -. . c r —

• o ro —

• 3 o CO tu £ s ro ft) Q
. ft> O-T J CT T3* < 0 » - J

— aO C O —'T J O O - I - I X -.-r o ft) A> ro C c f 3 —<r o -• • ro 3 C O C Q ft) 3 - -t > ro r f ro 3

- I ft) Q
. 3 3 CO O c f c f ft)

— " c o

— ' ro o> ro c f 3 O Q
. 3 ft) -t»C O

— ' C tu ( Q 3 < Q < Q ro ro c o CO i f ro - i i Q L O

— •ft)

_ J O - I -t ro ro t o Q L C CT" ft) < < r f £ B » -> •

ro ft) o 0 ) 3 f i 7 TQ
. ro o > c o

- j - j o c o a . 3 •ro _a . o 3 o o - i _ i
. ( D c f < ft) co ro —

•

- * — • £ ft) ro — • - D

- i — • ro o ft> o 3 CT-3IQ -i c r ro - i

. -a . C O ( D 3 -t>o » ro

— I c f < « < -• • ro o - J 3 « < C O c f O £ f i O c f 3 :

Q
.

— I mU. ro o o > a > 7*r c f c u ro < Q ro 3 - •o £ ft) U 3 - I ro o . o

ro o 3 -ttiO ro

_ I ( v -i

- J at m
" O C O _• . o 1 3 ro ro o . •

3 " ft) ft) 3 c f ta ro c u 3 o o -• •c 3 — i -• •o . c f _• . o ft) T 3

— ' ro tu —•3 i o> ro 1 3 ( Q c o ro o CO — a • at at -i 3 ( Q 3 > O <-• •-f> o> Xft)
c o — ft) ro — —>•

TO cn 3 o ro C L 3 < at at -t > c u - s -• •ro ft) 3 - j — • rf —in at tz o — • 3 3 « < ca. 3

mmi. £ O c f - > •-t i c f C f ro 3 - c ro 0 3 c -. . 3 c f o ro 3 3

— ' c r at a at 01 CU -i ? r - j CO ft) o * t o -. . o at cx.o at 3

- —3 c o -i . ro ro 3 3 ro o . c f _• . n > j » o Q
. c f tu c f c f O o > ro 3 O Q
. 3 " CO 3 c f c f ro 3 - ft) 3 ft) 3 c f c f a .

ft> V O -f l - j ^ — •Q
. •ft) C

O 3 C Q -t >

- H ro o 3 - C O I ro

- I 3 -f i ro a > —

• f,< < ft) o 3 TOI O ro - o ro

- ro c o

- j • 3 " ft) ro c f ro 3

- $ - I

T J ro ro T J 3 tu a , _• .

— ' - J c f ft) _ i
. C T ro — • c o ro - f
. < o o >

- i — • < n ro 3 - C O

- s o -• • < o

ft) — •

— ' ft) < c o ro co
C O « < ft) 3 —'C O tz--.cn

3 3 c f

- I T J ft) ro — ' c + T J ro ro o > 3

— •ro - $

- i 3 ro ft) c f < a c r -• - c

— i ro i o ft>

o o c : a > 3

~ S -f i ro A> • o o ft> -• • -i -• • ft) c f CT"*<

r f ft» « < - ^ O £ ft)CTro

ro tu at -i CO o ft) £ ro < CLtu c f < o ro -i » » ro c o 3 a a= -• • t = 3 3 £ = ro 3 X »

- I ft) ro -• • T 3 -i ft! ft)

_ . . C T

- S — • ft) ro e x = ro
t o

-— rf 3 " c f ro 3 " ro ft> 3

—o 3 C O 3

— •c f C CO O
- • •- h O O 3

- h ro < ft) o ft) 3 - 5

— ' * < 1 < tz at 3 -i -i at T J ro T J O T J - I o tu at —• -.. c o

- 5 ro -ft tu Zi O C Tc f O — ' ft) c ro « f CO -a . ro < < o . & > ro

— ' CO o < 3 ro ft>

3 "C TQ
. O a —O Z •*— —• TO
• O c f O 3 " 1 5 O W
- • •C O C O C Q -.ni n -••cr o c f i o CO ro c o c f

- s -• •ro _• . o o . tu 3 ft) - t > o o

- J c f ft) 3 " 3 ro -t > o

- $ ro

ft>

< < 3

ro

- 5 ro

. o c

- i ro 3 ro 3

O

- J ft) 3 ft) O O ro

- o c f ft> o - ro x=t 3 > X D o 3 3 - J c f ro O S » C O X I 3 O — ' C c f — i Ot c f ->• C Q 0 ) -C T o -n n - i 3 3 -i o I Q ro ro o c ro 3

- I 3 —'c f c f * < CL. rf T J O CO 3 " CT - - J O c f ro ro o 3

- 5 CT-TJ ro T J Q
. — ' o m ro ro ro 3 c o 3 < 3 ro ro B > ro 3 a. —• —' o c f c f o o c

o c f < < T J 3 3 - ro T J >

v ft) o o . O —

• c f -I , 3 O

c f ro 3 c f 3 3 " 3 C Q 3 " O ft) c f fl) - J r f £ ro o . -• • o T J ro c f O -f i -l

C O 3 " 3 - i o -« • 3 ro c f c o -• • -••J O ro 3 3 c f c o C

O - o c f ro c + —

• ro 3 c o o ro ro c f - j 3 o t ro £ 3 c

o 3 o o -t > ro r f tz 3 ft) - 5 ft)

— •-• •O < r f Q
. c f -a . -a . -• • o — •o o 3 - j -• •ro 3 ro -• •c f c

o ro 3 * < •o O.V Q -» > CX C O "C Tc f ro c - j ro 3 t o o o o ( O 3 3 " 3 ro ro 3 c o c o o c f c f O — a

— j ro o o ft) O
. 3 C Q c f •O l < ro c f o Q
. 3 " 3 - h ft) ro o CT" c f 3 - J * < c f
- • •C O c f T3 - 3 " ro - o ro

- o — ' ft) C

O

— •ro 3 ro ft) 3 CL - n ro ro 3 c f c + 3 c f o o ro o > 3 c f ro ro c f -" •3 - h o n -t , o 3 o ro -t o tz

n o - s c f ft) -t » ft)

( Q
. - i , c o ro 3 - -i« = ro ft> n o n 3 " 3 - s c f I Q ro _ i
. ft> o "C T O -i
. — ' 3 T J 3 ft) -IlD O o o ro -h» Q 3 3 -i o ro ft) ft) 3 3 3 -• •c f Q
. O

ro o c o 3
- . . c r I Q -. . 3 3 ro ft) Q
. c f

_ i
. o Q
. -l » ro 3 X 3 c f c : _ • . ft,

- h — • < < -a - c f T J « <

- I o rt cr o

— ' 3 ro r f 3 - I o o — • O N 3 - O -C T C O ft) 3 — • ro —• 3 c f c f « < c o tu ft> c o 3 c o C L CZ -i CO ft) ro 3

- j n < ro

a ) 3 C L — •o - c o ro zc at at 3 - x ft> ft) 3 o ro - j X " ro c 3 c f ro f i —'T J ro -f -« •Q
. c f - J co c fro

3 Q
. CO

— ' o o o - > •- h r f f i 3 " 3 - J ro - < •C O ft) O 3 r f ro —

) 3 ro •3 - - c

o
- • •O c f ' £ =r- h i n o > ro o ro 3 3 - j 3 o - J —<• tz s ro a . 3 ft) I c o ro o . —' O c o

_ . . O — •-a - O O 3 ft) Q
. ft) - I T J C f -a . c f — ' -< •3 ro B » « < o I Q Q
. 3 -• •3 3 3 - 3 " rtClf l O 3 " ft) £ ft) —'T O 3 c f - J - J " O I
—O •- I moo . o TJ> C > a > ^ j n o . c

c f ft) O c r c r x c f ro > < T J

— ' - I -hT J
- • - - j o ro -i ro ro o —

•o < aitn n ro ro c o ro CO -f > C

O c f C O ->• ro 3 - c o c f3 c o ft) ro 3 " -• •c f CO 0 ) 3 c f c f « Q O c f £

3 " O 3 c f 3 " ro tz 3 > 3 " 0 ) — a o ro < c

o o . —t a> n tu ZT

rr —<• — •c fro ro C O — •3 " 3 o ro ro o > £ o > c r ro c f 3 -• •ft) o — t

o - j o . c r -t > 3 - •ro — ' ro •C T3 ro t u

- 5 3 > c f o O CJ
. -< - c f = O c f ft) -f i O C

O 3 ro x » < c

u o o -a - 3 f , ro
, r f ro 3 ro ro T J 3 I Q ro i f c f 1 cfT J cf« < C 3 " 3 " < tu O tu ft) c f < — ' CO c o — ' 3 " ft) ro -< •< ro —•m I M ro < T J T J ro c

o c o ro " o -so . c f s - j O c f ft) O Q
. m 3 " 3 -f i ft) C T J ft) o . o n O J > r f ft) - J 3 - c + - - J c o n o . -"T > T J ft) O
. - J

- j £ 3 0 ) ro ro O -< •3 3 3 CO o — ' o o . c f ro 0 ) — ' C f -a- 3 t O -a - ft) f , C f c o 3 c r 3 < < ro ro C Q ro -> •o . C O 3 c 3 ro - 5 3 » Q CT" c f c o ro - s « < 3 - c o -a at -C T ft) w o i n c f c f —>•

ft) o 3 O - I -• •Q
. J > 3 ro - j tz at rt a. tu n zr < < o c r c f —-. 3 -• •—

•i o 3 C O 3 ro T J 3 " o -• •- j —

• c f Q
. ft) < O -< • ro ft> o i n 3 - j c f —

•ro 3 - ro -< •< c

o c f ro a > 3 ro c

o c o c f ro ro 3 —'T J CO c f c f CO < < O 3 " 3 " ft) O c f ro ro - h - h — •

3 - ro ft> t u o c f c o -t o c f O v < 3 " O 3
-• • - j & ) r > < o - s ro B ) 3 ro T J

— ' •c f < 3 CO ro o c o 3 ft) ft) c f ro ro —

•- j zr < ro —

< ro cu ro c-t - o 3

- i -•• £ 3 o ) 3 cu ro t u —'< Q c r ro

— ' c f — > • < c f ro -• •ro ro 3 - 3 o

> c u _• . —<I Q ^~ ~i c o ro CO ft) c f Q L

— ' T T3 " ro C f -a - < 0 -" •-f | O 3 - J c o -a . -••C O 3
- • •C f —>

-i. 3 —'r o c f T J 3 -a - ft) -> .

- J O 3 7« rO O £ -> • 3 < c f O
. ro o> ro o 3 £ f , f i C-t - Q
. ft, _• • 3 - c o 3 c n ro -C T-* •o -•—'s-n o

- J ft, _. . _j
. 3 ( Q O T J -C Tc f 3 " 3 T J ro C O - 3

- I ft) < - f l CO O —' - o tz o -i

- i c r 3 ro c

o 3 <_> . c o cu -• • ft> ro -• •o . 3 3 n o.« < o o c f ro •ro ro - j C f -a - C O c r o 3 3 : ro ro ( Q ro <

- h 3 ro O J > c f ft) - 5

- j o 3 - — •o > ro — I A

) c o — i c f o • n £ T J 3 " -"•T J - h — ' ft) — •— •ro ft> CO — •ft) — ' 3 ro 3 c f c f 3 " c f C O C O ft) C

O c f < zr

->. cr at o , ft> 3 ro - j c f I Q ro — i _••c f ro 3 3 " X c o ro o >

c oP.1 4



### Severa l committe e member s suggeste dstandard s fo r pumps . Som e committe e member s suggeste dtha t dua l mechanica l seal s be require d o npumps . Severa l industr y member s expresse dconcer nwit hthi s suggestion . Some fel t tha t dua l mechanica l seal s ma y no t be easil y retrofitte dont o al l pumps ; other s reporte dproblem s wit h dua l mechanica l seal s insome applications . Dua l mechanica l seal s ma y no t b e saf e insom

e processe s (e.g. , pharmaceutical s an dfood additives ) becaus e o f potentia l contaminatio no f th e proces s flui d an dth e barrie r flui dsystem . Mr . Aja xchallenge dth e committe e t o sugges t alternative s tha t woul dresul t ineffectiv e pum p emissio ncontro l an

dt o detai l application s fo r whic hdua l mechanica l seal s shoul dno t be used . H e presente dcost s fo r dua l mechanica l seal s (se e Attachmen t 10) .
Ancillar y

Factor s o f th e Standar d Committe e member s discusse dth e inclusio no f respons e factor s correctio nint o th e conceptua l approac ht o th e standard . Mr . Kittlema nstate dtha t respons e facto r correction s ar e costl y an d impractica l fo r fiel duse . Mr . Aja xsuggeste dtha t a softwar e packag e b e develope dtha t woul dsimplif y respons e facto r correctio ninth e field . H e presente dexistin g informatio nabou t respons e factor s fo r specifi c chemical s (se e Attachmen t 11) . Mr . Kittlema nsai dtha t CM A i s willin g t o accep t a 50 0 ppm v lea k definitio nwithou t respons e facto r correction . Mr . Aja xsai dtha t EPA woul dprobabl y

b e willin g t o accep t thi s althoug hhe fel t bette r option s wer e available . Mr . Jac k Kac e o f th e Pharmaceutica l Manufacturer s Associatio n reporte do

nth e progres s o f th e Batc hProcessin g Workgroup . Th e workgrou pha s bee nattemptin g t o defin e batc hprocesses . Th e definitio nma y

includ e percentag e o f time i nservice . Mr . Kac e reporte dtha t El i Lill y andCompany

ha s volunteere dt o conduc t a pressur e tes t t o determin e whethe r o r no t pressur e test s coul db e use da s analternativ e lea k testin g methodology . Th e workgrou pals o plan s t o discus s a LDA Rfrequenc y

fo r batc h component s base do

ntime inus e o f th e components . Futur e discussion s includ e th e possibl e inclusio no f pilo t plant s int o th e standard , alternativ e tes t methods , an da d e minimi s time in us e cutoff . Mr . Davi dDun no f Sterlin g Chemica l Company expresse dconcer ntha t smal l continuou s chemica l producer s wh o canno t mee t th e standar d woul dsuffe r economi c hardship s associate dwit hmor e frequen t monitoring . Mr . Aja xreplie dtha t mechanism s wer e possibl e (e.g. , a percen t pric e impac t criterion) . However , h e questione dth e

cao.027 aP.1 5



### nee dfo r thi s sinc e th e standar dshoul dad dlittl e t o th e cos t a t plant s tha t ar e now

operatin g a t leas t minima l contro l programs . Mr . Aja xresponde dt o industr y members ' earlie r suggestion s tha t EPA shoul dpursu e a

naward s program

fo r exemplar y

performanc e simila r t o on e tha t i s i nplac e i nothe r EPA programs . H e indicate dtha t EPA

woul db e willin g t o conside r this . However , i t wa s no t clea r ho

w suc ha program

migh t work . H e aske dth e member s t o giv e furthe r consideratio nt o thi s an dpromise dt o pus hfo r i t i f a workabl e program appear s possible . Mr . Aja xaske dth e meetin g attendee s t o contac t hi m i f anyon e woul db e intereste dinplannin g a conferenc e t o shar e thought s an d experienc e relativ e t o equipmen t leak s emissio nestimatio nan d regulation . Actio nItem s At th e nex t meetin g o f th e ful l committee , standard s fo r pump s an d flange s wil l b e examine dingreate r detail . Intereste dpartie s wil l submi t t o EPA

thought s abou t dua l mechanica l sea l applicability . Severa l committe e member s wil l re-examin e th e followin g issues : cos t dat a fo r controllin g valve s an dpumps , d e minimi s concentratio ncutoffs , an d"safet y

valve " schemes . Futur e Meeting s

Th e nex t meetin g o f th e ful l Negotiatin g Committe e i s schedule dt o b e hel dinWashington , D . C . onMa y 10-11 , 199 0 a t th e Conservatio nFoundation , Suit e 500 , 125 0 24t hStree t NW . Th e nex t meetin g o f th e Batc hProcesse s Workgrou pi s schedule dt o b e hel di nWashington , D . C . beginnin g a t 1:3 0 p.m . onApri l 24 , 199 0 a t th e Pharmaceutica l Manufacturer s Associatio nheadquarters , 110 0 15t hStreet , N.W . Fo r information , contac t Chery l Sutterfiel da t (202)835-3552 . Jun e 6-7 : Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina , a t th e Compr i Hotel , Miam i Blv

da t Interstat e 40 .

cao.027 aP.1 6



# ATTACHMEN T1
ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y NEGOTIATIN G COMMITTE E FO R CONTRO L O F FUGITIV E EMISSION S FRO M EQUIPMEN T LEAK S


## AGEND A FO RMEETIN GO FMARC H 27-2 8

Administrativ e

• Introduction s

• Review o

f th e Agenda : additions , subtractions , orde r

• Minute s o

f February meeting : Any major heartburn s Scop e of th e Standard : An y question s o rcomments ?

• Source s include di

n th e negotiation s

• Source s exclude dfro

mthi s standard
Data/Emissio n Factor s

• Any new datafo

r th e Committee' s consideratio n

• Discussion o

f dat a

• Any additional dat abein g develope do r tha t i s essential fo

r th e Committee' s deliberation s

• Matri x approac h

• Correlatio n curve s

• Statu s o

f modellin g approac h Ancillar y Factor s o

f th e Standard

• Exemption s

• Equivalent

approache s

• New versu s existin g plant s

• Phase-i n

• Tagging requirement s

• Reportin g an drecordkeepin g

• Respons e factor s Standard

• Nee dt o consider

separatel y standardfor

valves , flanges , pumps , compressor s

• Conceptual Approac h

—moving fromon e bo x t o anothe r

—ho w ar c component s tha t ar e remove dfro

mservic e treate d

—how ar e component s that canno t b e repaire dshor

t o f shutdow n treate d

• Level

—wha t i s th e threshol dat

eac hpoint

in th e approac h

—percent

abov e th e threshol d Repor to f th e Batch Processing Worksho pP.1 7



# ATTACHMEN T2

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y NEGOTIATIN GCOMMITTE E FO R CONTRO L O F FUGITIV E EMISSION S O F VOC s FROM EQUIPMEN T LEAK S ATTENDEE S LIS T FORMEETINGO F MARC H 27' , 199 0

NAM E
E dMorett i Le e Walin g Bil l Grimle y Jo e Rya n Bruc e Davi s Jerr y M . Schro y Richar dG . Moenc h Kare nDelug a Raymon dA . Collin s LeighMark s Ja nMeye r Walte r Brenne r Scot t Throw e Bo bHinkso n Do nPiehn Bo bRowlan d Miria m Lev-O n RonBerglun d Davi dMarkword t Jac k Farme r Glen nRive s Howar dElli s Kathy Kaufma n Ric k Colye r Rober t Pahel-Shor t Davi dDun n Alle nHerskowit z Rober t Majewsk i Alfre dW . Bicku

m Gu s VonBodunge n Bruc e V . Bower s Bo bAja x Phili pHarte r To m Kittlema n Jac k Kac e Harve l Roger s Lind a Curra n L T Goodhear t Elle nSiegle r Debora hDa l to n Dwigh t Atkinso n Bruc e Grumstru p Kare nFidle r Bo bLatham Kari nRitte r P . K . Li m Mar y An nGork o AFFILIATIO N Radia nCorporatio n Durametalli c Corporatio n EP A E G& G Stalo l Exxo nChemica l Company Monsant o Company El i Lill y

& Compan y CP I Plant s Inc . El i Lill y

& Company El i Lill y

& Company EP A SU N Company EPA Moba y Corporatio n JohnCrane , Inc . Pfize r Inc . ARC O Unio nCarbid e EPA EP A Radia n Enviropla n EPA EPA EPA Sterlin g Chemical s Nat . Resource s Def . Counci l NESCAUM IISR P LA
. DEQ-Ai r Qualit y 

### Standar dChlorin e U . S . EP A Facilitato r Chem . Manuf . Assoc . Pharmaceutica l Manuf . Assoc . Jefferso nCompany , APC D Amoc o Oi l Company AP I AP I EPA EPA (OPPE ) Fishe r Control s Compan y CM A Reflang e AP I Nort hCarolin a Stat e Universit y DuPon tTIATION S WOO D STOVE AGREEMEN T 20 7

Novembe r 7 , 198 6

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y NEGOTIATIN G COMMITTE E

FO R NE W SOURC E PERFORMANC E STANDAR D FO RRESIDENTIA L WOO D HEATER S

AGREEMEN T Th e Negotiatin g Committe e considere d th e technica l an d pol ic y issue s involve d i na ne w sourc e performanc e standar d fo r residentia l woo d heater s and ha s reache d a consensu s o na recom mende d propose d rule . U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y agree s that : t. part y t o th e negotiations ,

1 . Th e perso nsignin g thi s documen t i s authorize d t o commi t th e organizatio nt o th e term s o f th e agreement . 2 . I t concur s i nth e recommende d propose d rul e entitle d 'Recom mende d Propose d Rule s ~ Residentia l Woo d Heate r NSPS " tha t i s date d "10/24/86 " and tha t i s attache d t o thi s agreemen t whe nconsidere d a s a whole . 3 . a . EP A

agree s t o draf t a preambl e consisten t wit hth e recom mende d propose d rul e and t o publis htha t preambl e and th e recommende d propose d rul e a s a Notic e o f Propose d Rule makin g fo r a Ne w

Sourc e Performanc e Standar d fo r Residen tia l Woo d Heaters . b . I f th e propose d rul e and it s preambl e ar e consisten t wit h th e recommende d propose d rule , eac hothe r part y agree s no t t o fil e negativ e comment s i nrespons e t o th e Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g and t o fil e a memorandu m i nth e docke t tha t i t participate d i nth e negotiation s an d tha t i t concurre d i nth e recommende d propose d rul e whe ncon sidere d a s a whole . 4 . a . EP A

wil l conside r al l relevan t comment s submitte d in respons e t o th e Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g an d wil l mak e suc hmodification s i nth e proposa l a s ar e necessar y whe nissuin g a fina l rule . b . Eac hothe r part y agree s no t tak e any actio nt o inhibi t th e adoptio no f th e recommende d propose d rul e a s a fina l rule . 5 . Eac hpart y

othe r tha nEP A

agree s no t t o challeng e th e fina l rul e i ncour t i f th e fina l rul e and it s preambl e ar e consis ten t wit hth e recommende d propose d rule .20 8 CONCLUDIN G THE NEGOTIATION S

6 . I f th e fina l rul e i s challenge d i n cour t an d i f the preambl e and fina l rul e ar e consisten t wit hth e recommende d propose d rule , the neac hpart y othe r tha nEPA agree s t o fil e a memo - randu m informin g th e cour t tha t i t participate d i n th e nego - tiation s an

d tha t i t concurre d i n th e recommende d propose d rul e whe nconsidere d a s a whole . 7 . Thi s agreemen t take s effec t whe nal l member s o f the Negoti - atin g Committe e hav e signe d it .

Rober tL . Ajax Individua l Committe e Membe r
U.S . EP A Organizatio n November13 , 198 6 Dat e

$ & T*?ftt ENVIRONMENTA L P AGENC Y 4 0 CF R Par t 6 0 [AO-FRL-3iaa-7(b) | Standard s o t

Perfo r Stationar y Sources ; Performanc e to r

N e Residentia l Woo dH AGENCY : Environme r Agenc y (EPA)

. ACTION : Propose dr

u publi c hearing

.

. SUMMARY : Th e prop c woul dlimit

purlicul o emission s fro

mne w heaters

. Th e propos e develope dthroug ht

) regulator y negotiati c Sectio n 11 1 o

f th e C l base dupo n th e Adix determinatio n tha t

v > o r contribut e signific pollutio n whic hma

y anticipate dt o enda r welfare

. Th e propo s requir e woo dheate r o r afte r Jul y 1,1988

. reducin g emission s i achievabl e b y th e b

< syste mo f conlinuo u reduction , consider i qualit y healt han de impacts , an denerg y I f requested , apul hel dt o provid e inte i opportunit y fo

r ora l data , views , o r

argu . th e propose dstand s DATES : Comments. ( receive do n o r

befo r Public Hearing. I

f EP A requestin g t o S | hearin g b y Marc h1 1 hearin g wil l b e hel d beginnin g a t

10:00 a intereste din atten d shoul dcal l Ms

. Ann phon e numbe r

liste i Informatio n Conta c hearin g wil l b e hel dP.2 0



# ATTACHMEN T4

REVISION S T O FEBRUAR YMINUTE S Firs t bulle t unde r Scop e o f th e Standar d(pag e 1 )

Mr . Bo bAja xo f EPA

describe dth e rol e tha t thi s regulator y negotiatio nwil l pla y inth e Agncy' s promulgatio no f a Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON) . Unde r th e HON , th e Agenc y intend s t o promulgat e standard s fo r controllin g emission s o f approximatel y 19 1 hazardou s ai r pollutant s liste di nth e Clea nAi r Ac t fro m equipmen t leaks , wastewater , proces s vent , storage , an dtransfe r operation s fo r a s many a s 15 0 sourc e categories . Th e negotiatin g committe e wil l develo pth e generi c equipmen t leak s standard . Th e Agenc y wil l estimat e environmental , cost , an deconomi c impact s o f th e resultin g combine dgeneri c standard s an dpromulgat e th e standard s unde r Titl e II I o f th e expecte dClea r Ai r Ac t revisions . Secon dbulle t unde r Dat a (pag e 2 )

Th e EPA correcte dth e usabl e dat a t o adjus t fo r th e respons e facto r o f eac hmonitorin g instrument , an dpresente da revise d analysi s showin g th e percen t leaker s b y componen t typ e fo r variou s lea k definition s (Se e Attachmen t 6) . Some committe e member s expresse dconcer ntha t respons e facto r correctio nma y b e difficul t t o perfor m

simultaneousl y

wit hequipmen t screening , especiall y fo r mixe dHA P streams . Mr . Aja xsuggeste dtha t th e highes t respons e facto r fro

m al l stream s withi na plan t ma y b e use da s a defaul t respons e factor . Severa l Committe e member s recommende dtha t th e Committe e discus s furthe r how respons e factor s shoul db e treate d inth e regulation . Firs t bulle t unde r Lea k Definitio nan dAllowabl e Leakers : MAC T (pag e 3 ) Th e committe e discusse dsevera l combination s o f lea k definitio n an dallowabl e lea k frequencie s fo r us e i nPhas e II I o f th e standard . Ther e wa s genera l agreemen t tha t th e lea k definitio n shoul db e hig henoug ht o minimiz e th e effect s o f operato r an d instrumen t variabilit y whil e simultaneousl y providin g a

n environmenta l benefi t a t a reasonabl e cost . Discussio nfocuse don a lea k definitio nrangin g fro m 25 0 t o 1,00 0 pp

m an da nallowabl e limi t rangin g fro

m abou t on e t o thre e percent . Secon dbulle t unde r Lea k definitio nan dallowabl e leakers : MAC T (pag e 3 )

. Severa l committe e member s expresse dconcer ntha t a lea k definitio n belo w 1,00 0 ppm

v wa s no t appropriat e fo r severa l reasons . First , screenin g dat a ma y

b e les s reliabl e a t lowe r screenin g value s du e t o increase dvariabilit y i nconcentratio nmeasurements . Dat a wer e presente donth e tendenc y o f component s leakin g a t low concentration s t o retur nt o zer o durin g subsequen t screening sP.2 1



### withou t anyrepai r attempts
. Second , attempt s t o repai r equipmen t tha t emit s a t ver ylo wconcentration s ma yresul t i n highe r screenin g value s tha n before
. Finally , replacemen t o f equipmen t t o achiev e lo wlea k definition s coul d resul t i n highe r emission s associate d wit h shutdow n and equipmen t evacuatio n tha n fro mth e lea k itself
. Fourt h bulle t unde r Lea k definitio n and allowabl e leakers : MAC T (pag e 4 )

Adiscussio n aros e a s t o whic h plant s shoul d constitut e th e basi s fo r MACT
. On e suggestio n wa s tha t th e averag e E O industr y performanc e reflect s MACT , sinc e th e E O industr yi s a wel l controlle d industr yrelativ e t o th e 19 1 CA Achemicals
. Severa l committe e member s disagreed , sayin g tha t onl yth e best-controlle d plant s shoul d reflec t MACT , and a fe wo f th e E O plant s coul d no t b e considere d best-controlled
. Fourt h bulle t unde r Conceptua l Approac h t o th e Standar d (pag e 5 )
DELET E THI S ENTIR E BULLET . Committe e member s agree d tha t th e issu e o f rando msamplin g shoul d b e abandone d fo r th e purpose s o f thi s negotiate d regulation
. Sixt h bulle t unde r Conceptua l Approac h t o th e Standar d (pag e 5 )

Committe e member s discusse d provision s fo r demonstratin g equivalen t approache s t o th e propose d standard
. Committe e member s wil l wor k towar d definin g specifi c equivalenc e criteri a fo r th e regulation
. Firs t bulle t unde r Emissio n Factor s (pag e 5 )

Mr
. Rober t Pahel-Shor t o f EP Apresente d a serie s o f figure s illustratin g th e relationshi p betwee n emissio n factor s and lea k frequenc yfo r variou s equipmen t type s and lea k definition s (Se e Attachmen t 12)
. Th e committe e member s generall yfel t tha t thes e type s o f figure s wil l b e usefu l fo r estimatin g emissio n factors
. Secon d bulle t unde r Actio n Item s (pag e 6 )

Mr
. Goodhear t expresse d concer n wit h th e manne r o f awardin g credi t fo r takin g equipmen t ou t o f service
. The ywil l addres s thi s issu e a t th e nex t committe e meeting
. Thir d bulle t unde r Actio n Item s (pag e 6 )

CMAindicate d the ywer e intereste d i n providin g assistanc e t o th e Committe e i n evaluatin g th e cos t impact s o f a standard
.P.2 2



# ATTACHMEN T5

KMMMMMW^WtMmBM ^ 

## EP A NEGOTIATE D RULEMAKIN GFO R1 FUGITIV E HAZARDOU S CHEMICAL S

LO WCONCENTRATIO N STREA M CUTOF F

REFINER Y EMISSION S DISTRIBUTIO N

EQUIPMEN T DISTRIBUTIO N

COS T BENEFI T ANALYSI S

PROPOSA LP.2 3

# 1
H

H H 

# 1 •^^^^^^•^^^^^^^^^•^^ ^

1 Cost s t o Achiev e MAC T 1 Tota l Qualit y Contro l Progra m

Basi c - Quarterl y l& M o

f a 200 0 valv e facilit y IVSS/year 1
. Inspectio n an d Maintenanc e ~ • ' Inspectio n = 2000*4 * 2.7 5 $/valv e 2 2 Maintenanc e = 30 % tighte n + 30 % repai rI

+ •40 % replac e 1 5 1 Tota l l& M Costs 3 7 1 2
. Tota l Qualit y Contro l Progra m 1

- On e engineerin g analys t 10 0 1

- Tw o techician s t o implemen t 1 th e tota l qualit y progra m 15 0 1 3
. Valve testin g facilitie s (annualized ) 5 0 1 4
. Engineerin g stud y t o mee t MAC T2 0 1 5
. Increas e i n plan t star t u p 25 0 1 tim e t o tes t valve s fo r leakag e 1 Tota l cos t o

f Tota l Qualit y Contro l 60 0 M $ 1 Cos t pe r valv e 3Q 0 

# I



# 1 ^^^^—^^-^ —1 

# •

.^^^ H 

# i

.^^^H .^^^H 

# •

# 1 

# 1
1 1 H 1 1 1 H H 1 1 

# i

^ i 

# ^""^^^"^^ H

Cas e I I Replac

e 50% o f Valve s wit h Lo wLea k Technolog

y i^^^ H
1
. Total Qualit

y Contro l Progra m 60 0 M$ ^^^^^ H 2
. On e tim e cost

s o f replacin g valve

s wit h ^^^^^ H bellow s valve

s ^^^^^^ H

- Capita l cost

s valve

s 240 0 ^^^^^ H

- Valv e ^^^^^^ 1

- Pipin g modification s 125 ^^^^H |

- Engineerin g desig n cost s 3 7 ^^^^^ H

- Incrementa l tim e required t o replac e valve s 5 day

s ^^^^^^ |

- Increase

d shutdow

n cost s 250 0 ^^^^^^ H Total capita l 570 0 M$ ^^^^^ H Annualize d capita l cos

t 127 5 M$ ^^^^^ H Total cos t t a compl

y wit h MAC

T190 0 M$ ^^^^^ | Cos t pe r valv e 95 0 lill^^f l

# CAS E II I INCREASE D PLAN TSHUTDOWN S

Tota l Qualit y Contro l Program s Cost o fIncrease d Plan t Shutdown s Assum e tha t plant s hav e t o increas e th e plan t shutdow n frequenc y t o tha t o fth e E O plants
. A pre-MAC Tshutdow n frequenc y o fthre e year s wil l b e substitute d by a majo r planne d shutdow n ever y yea r an d a si xmont h shor t shutdow n o fon e wee k t o repai r leakin g valve s Shutdow n cost s @ 50 0 M S pe r da y 3
. Tota l cost s t o achiev e MAC T Costs pe r valv e 380 0

# Valve s Capture d vs . % Tota l Benzene , Toluene , Xylen e (BTX ) Strea m Compositio n Numbe r o

f Valves Captured 8000- 1



# 600 0

400 0

200 0

% Tota l BT

X Strea m Compositio nP.2 8 

# 1

^^f l ^^^ B.^^^^|^^^^^H



## - . ® 

# 0 9 - E 5 r

# "3 » ^^^ H 

# H 

# 1 So .IBeiComs.%Tota



# ^^ 1 

# H

^^^^^M 

# ^^^ H ^^^M 

# .^ HDturec(Streamred



# E I yne(BngesCa



### C B » « l* i O 5» » u


### - ' ® > / 

# t - 

# -

<= > a 0 - 5 * S 5 

# 1 i 

# i "20;3TXStreami

C O

1 1 1 1 

### v * • o o o o o CO^^° o o o o o 0 9 

# o1Flan i - o » J S C

MINum1 OOO O 

### ^ c o t o ^ - 

## — i h 0 

## o t s CN JP.2 9

>^N^\'*K»«MK5i*»^ ^ 'WMWMUI 

## EP A NEGOTIATE D RULEMAKIN GFO R FUGITIV E HAZARDOU S CHEMICAL S

>29 5

15 0 J 

## Cos t Benefit Analysi s

12 5

10 0 4

7 5 J 

### Cos t M$/Ton BT

X Removed 5 0



### 2 5
Pur e BT X

T 

### 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0

%Tota l BT X Strea mCompositio n 5 0

# Correlatio n o

f Emissio n Factor s v s %Leaker s Singl e Sea l Pump s i n E O & B D Unit s

1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 

# Percen t Leaker s a t 200 0 pp m 5 0 

# 3 o 2 m z H

# Correlatio n o

f Emissio n Factor s v s %Leaker s Singl e Sea l Pump s i n E O & B D Unit s 0.03 5

1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0



# Percen t Leaker s a t 100 0 pp m 5 0

C O

# Correlatio n o

f Emissio n Factor s vs %Leaker s Singl e Sea l Pump s i n E O & B D Unit s 0.03 5

1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0



# Percen t Leaker s a t 50 0 pp m 5 0 6 0

# Correlatio n o

f Emissio n Factor s vs %Leaker s Dua l Sea l Pump s i n E O & B D Unit s 0.01 2 0 ) O 3 O ( 0 0.00 8 - O )


# o o C O 

## Li
. 

# c o 'co 

# <n
mamtm 

# E LU 0.00 6 -

0.00 4 -

0.00 2 -

1 0 1 5 2 0



# Percen t Leaker s a t 50 0 pp m 2 5 3 0

# MAS S EMISSIO N FACTO R V S SCREENIN G VALU E Ga s Valve s

a> u i

_ 3 O tn O )
C O 

### c C A _j o 

### E U J C O ( 0 ( 0 

### 0.04 8

0.04 0

0.03 2 -

0.02 4 -

0.01 6 -

0.00 8 - 0.045 2

0.016 1

- i 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 

### 0 10,00 0 20,00 0 30,00 0 40,00 0 50,00 0 60,00 0 70,00 0 80,00 0 90,00 0 100,00 0 Screenin g Valu e (ppmv ) fo reac h valv e

# Compariso n o f Correlation s usin g Protoco l Lea k

Facto r v s Revise d Lea k Facto r Ga s Valve s i n E O & B D Unit s -S T 000 2 

# o 3 O CO 

## 0.001 5 D ) 

# 2 0.00 1 o C O 

## L L C 0.000 5 

# o "5 5 

# c o E 

# u i Protoco l

Revise d



## 4 6 8 

# Percen t Leaker s at 50 0 pp m 1 0 

## 1 2

# Effect o

f Repai r o n Screenin g Valu e Distributio n

U. D



## 0. 5

> •*• * ^ ^ 

# S0. 4 C O 

# n o C L 0. 3
< D >

••• • 

# T 3 0.2 

# t r 0. 1

n \ \


### \ \

\ \ \ \ \ >
. s

Afte r repai r 

# v*v ^

^^^ ^ 

## I ^p : 

## = ? 

## ^*r^^_ J -^ — Repai r trigge r

Befor e repai r 

# 1 t
1 0 10 0 1,00 0 

# Screenin g Valu e (ppm ) 10,00 0

### CD



### O 

## 0.00 3


# o ( 0 0.002 5


# ££, 0.00 2 

# o o

, 2 0.001 5 

# c o

• M B 

### C O 0.00 1 

# E UJ § > 0.000 5 C O 

# c 5
> 

# < o 

# Effect o

f Repai r at 50 0 pp m Ga s Valve s

1 0 1 5 

# Percen t Leaker s 2 0 2 5P.3 8



# ATTACHMEN T7

03/27/9 0

EMISSIONS FOREXAMPL E ALTERNATIVE S COMPARISON

OF EMISSION S Numbe r o f Emission s (kg/hr ) Componen t - Equipmen t (SOCM I Av g Av g SOCMISterlin g Componen t Mode l Uncon t (Monthl y Benzen e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plan t B ) SOCM I LDAR ) Dat a

Ga s Valve s 40 2 2.25 1 0.60 8 0.12 3 0.07 3 0.05 6 0.05 6 0.04 9 0.04 6 0.03 1 0.03 1 0.02 4 Ligh t Liqui d52 4 3.72 0 1.52 5 0.16 0 0.37 7 0.34 7 0.34 7 0.30 4 0.27 8 0,26 5 0.26 5 0.23 7 Valve s Pump s 2 9 1.43 3 0.56 2 0.02 5 0.10 0 0.08 1 0.06 5 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.01 6 0.01 3 0.01 0 Flange s 240 0 1.99 2 1.99 2 0.04 8 3.03 8 2.60 9 1.80 7 1.51 9 1.30 6 0.90 2 0.75 8 0.65 3 Compressor s 20.45 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Open-ende d line s 22 6 0.38 4 000000000 0 Pressure-relie f 4 2 4.36 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dev ice s Samplin g 10 4 1.56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 connectio nsys . Tota l 16.16 4 4.68 7 0.35 6 3.58 9 3.09 3 2.27 6 1.92 3 1.68 0 1.21 4 1.06 7 0.92 4

COMPARISO N

O F EMISSION

FACTOR S (Se e footnote )

== a ===3=========:=s==============ss========s===:====ss=======================s=sa===================s====a==ssB53aass3=osasaa a Emissio n Facto r(kg/hr/source ) Equipmen t Avg Av g SOCMISterlin g Componen t Uncon t (Monthl yBenzen e 1234567 8 SOCM I LDAR

) Dat a
Ga s Valve s 0.0056 0 0.0015 1 0.0003 1 0.00018 2 0.00014 0 0.00014 0 0.00012 1 0.00011 5 0.00007 6 0.00007 6 0.00006 0 Ligh t Liqui d 0.0071 0 0.0029 1 0.0003 1 0.00072 0 0.00066 2 0.00066 2 0.00058 1 0.00053 0 0.00050 S 0.00050 5 0.00045 2 Valve s Pump s 0.0494 0 0.0193 6 0.0008 6 0.00346 5 0.00277 9 0.00225 4 0.00173 3 0.00173 3 0.00055 6 0.00045 1 0.00034 7 Flange s 0.0008 3 0.0008 3 0.0000 2 0.00126 6 0.001087 0.00075 3 0.00063 3 0.00054 4 0.00037 6 0.00031 6 0.00027 2 Compressor s 0.22 8 000000000 0 Open-ende d line s 0.001 7 000000000 0 Pressure-relie f 0.10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 device s (gas ) Samplin g 0.01 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 connectio n sys
.

pumps : 50 0 ppm , 10 % ga s valves: ' 100 0 ppm , 2 X liqui dvalves : 100 0 ppm , 2 % flanges : 50 0 ppm , 2 %
pumps : 500 0 ppm , 5 % ga s valves : 50 0 ppm , 2 % liqui dvalves : 50 0 pom , 2 % flanges : 250 , 25 . 3 pumps : 100 0 ppm , 5 X OA S valves : 50 0 oam. 2 X pumps : 50 0 ppm , 5 % ga s valves : 25 0 pp

m 2 X liqui dvalves : 25 0 ppm , 2 % flanges : 50 0 pp

m I X pumps : 50 0 ppm , 5 % ga s valves : 100 0 ppm , IX liqui dvalves : 100 0 ppm , I X flanges : 25 0 ppm , I X 6 pumps : 500 0 ppm , I X ga a valves : 50 0 ppm , I X liqui dval.ves : 50 0 ppm , I X flanges : 100 0 ppm , .5 X pumps : 100 0 ppm , IX ga s valves : 50 0 ppm , IX 1iqui dvalves : 50 0 ppm , IX flanges : 500 , .5X pumps : 50 0 ppm , IX ga s valves : 25 0 ppm , IX liqui dvalves : 25 0 ppm , IX flanges : 25 0 ppm , .5X

ga s valves : 50 0 ppm , 2 X liqui dvalves : 50 0 ppm , 2 X flanges : 100 0 ppm , I X.. . Emissio nfactor s ar e 25 Xlowe r tha ncalculate demissio nfactor s a t state dlea k definitio nan dpercen t leaker s
;/<CP.3 9

•

* 1

500 0 ppm 100 0 pp m 50 0 ppm

500 0 ppm 100 0 ppm 50 0 ppm
Assume s 2 9 Calculate d

100 0 ppm 50 0 pp m 25 0 ppm

100 0 ppm 50 0 ppm 25 0 ppm EMISSION FACTORMATRICE S
SINGL E MECHANICA L SEAL PUMP S (KG/HR/SOURCE ) 15 X

0.00833 6
0.00676 1 0.00519 8 10

X

0.00555 7 0.00450 7 0.00346 5 5

X

0.00277 9
0.00225 4 0.00173 3

PLAN T EMISSION S (KG/HR )

0.24175 1 0.19607 6
0.15072 8 0.16116 7

0.13071 7
0.10048 5 pumps/plan t emission s assum e pla n 0.08058 4
0.06535 9
0.05024 3 1 %

0.00055 6
0.00045 1 0.00034 7

0.01611 7 0.01307 2
0.01004 9

t' s emission s ar e 25 %

GA S VALVE S (KG/HR/SOURCE ) 4 %

0.00031 7 0.00026 7 0.00024 2 3 %

0.00024 9 0.00020 3
0.00018 1 2

X

0.00018 2 0.0001 4 0.00012 1

PLAN T EMISSION S (KG/HR )

0.12729 3 0.10715 3 0.09708 3 0.10021 9

0.08161 6 0.07281 2
Assume s 40 2 ga s valves/plan t Calculate d

100 0 ppm 50 0 ppm 25 0 ppm

100 0 ppm 50 0 pp m 25 0 ppm emission s assum e pla n 0.07314 4
0.05607 9 0.04854 2 1 %

"0.00011 5 7.6E-0 5 6.04E-0 5

0.04606 9 0.03054 2 0.02427 1

t' s emission s ar e 25 X

FLANGE S (KG/HR/SOURCE ) 4 X

0.00301 2 0.00253 2 0.00217 5 3X

0.00225 9 0.00189 9 0.00163 1 2

X

0.00150 6 0.00126 6 0.00108 7

PLAN T EMISSION S (KG/HR )

7.228 8 6.076 8 5.2 2 5.421 6

4.557 6 3.91 5 3.614 4

3.038 4
2.6 1 I

X

0.00075 3 0.00063 3 0.00054 4

1.807 2 1.519 2 1.30 5
Assume s 240 0 flanges/plan t Calculate d emission s assum e plant' s emission s ar e 25 X 50 0 ppm 250 ' pp m 10 0 ppm

50 0 ppm 25 0 ppm 10 0 ppm 03/27/9 0

DUA L MECHANICA L SEAL PUMP S (KG/HR/SOURCE ) 4 X 3 X 2 X I X

0.00142 7 0.00109 2 0.00075 7 0.00042 1
0.00142 7 0.00109 2 0.00075 7 0.00042 1 0.0011 1 0.00083 2 0.00055 5 0.00027 7

PLAN T EMISSION S (kg/hr )

0.0413 9 0.03166 8 0.02194 6 0.01222 3 0.0413 9 0.03166 8 0.02194 6 0.01222 3 0.0321 9 0.02414 2 0.01609 5 0.00804 7

owe r tha n emission s a t state d percentag e and lea k definition
.

100 0 ppm 50 0 pp m 25 0 ppm

100 0 ppm 50 0 ppm 25 0 pp m LIQUI D VALVE S (KG/HR/SOURCE )

4 X 3 X 2 X I X

0.00109 9 0.0009 1 0.0007 2 0.0005 3 0.00097 6 0.00081 9 0.00066 2 0:00050 5 0.00083 9 0.0007 1 0.00058 1 0.00045 2

PLAN T EMISSION S (KG/HR )

0.57613 8 0.47670 9 0.3772 8 0.27785 1 0.51129 3 0.42915 6 0.34701 9 0.26488 2 0.43976 7 0.37217 1 0.30457 5 0.23697 9
Assume s 52 4 liqui d valves/plan t owe r tha n emission s a t state d percentag e an d lea k definition
.

9

owe r tha n emission s a t state d percentag e an d lea k definition
.

# Star t - - Yea r 2 - - Phas e I LDA P 0.00 0 PP M -— •\ i^ U



# Yea r 5 Phas e II LDA R 100 0 PPM

Phas e II I 

### (3 % lo r 2 Consec

. Periods , Optio n l o Elec l Voluniar y Ex i 1 100 0 PP M



### <5 % >5% "

Monthl y 

### Al l Component s )3 % 

### Quarterl y Al l Component s 

## I <3 % 

### Canno tRetur n t o Phas e I o rI

I

Demonstrat e Reasonabl e Furthe r Progres s O

R 

# j i Semi-Annua l Al l Compone n 

# 3 '<! % 

## I <2 % 

## 4 

# 1

OPTIO N

—>l % — >2 % 

### -Lis tUnrepairabl e Componen tPoo l -Submi tRepai rPla n Fo rPoo l -Ca l a% Leaker s (Excludin g Pool ) Seml-Annua l O f 25 % Comp

. Annua l Al l Component s 

# 3

> 

# o
m

0 3

BASIS : 

### I

. 2

. 

### Avi S 

### r ^ hCI 

### ^ A pp,,e s T o A 

### P^ces s Uni t Soecm L ^Consecutiv e Monitorin g Period s (A tTh e Decrease ) TE? U 

### ^ Ar e Re 

### < * ulre d 

### T o Chang e (Increas e o r 100 0 PP M m.l*i°2" OTlna Freauenc 

### V ' " Phas e ill . 

# WTM-5M&^%^ ^ APP,le dP.4 1



# ATTACHMEN T9

FLANGES : PRESENTATIO N

BYRON BERGLUN D(UNION

CARBIDE )
Thi s attachmen t wa s no t availabl e fo r distributio nwit hth e minutes . Mr . Berglun di s revisin g hi s presentatio nslides . Thi s attachmen t wil l be availabl e t o al l Re g Ne g attendee s a t th e nex t Re g Ne g meeting .P.4 2



# ATTACHMEN T1 0

MEMORANDU

M TO : Bo bAjax , EPA/SD B FROM : E dMoretti , Radian/RT P DATE : Marc h20 , 199 0 SUBJECT : Cost s o f Singl e an dDoubl e Mechanica l Seal s fo r Pump s
Th e installe dcos t t o retrofi t a singl e mechanica l sea l wit ha doubl e mechanica l sea l i s estimate dt o b e $1,460 , includin g installatio ncost s o f $440 . Th e cos t fo r a new doubl e mechanica l sea l i s estimate dt o b e $83 0 whe ninstalle dinstea do f a new singl e mechanica l seal . A credi t o f $56 0 fo r a new

singl e mechanica l sea l wa s subtracte dfro m th e doubl e sea l cos t o f $1,02 0 t o yiel da ne t doubl e sea l cos t o f $460 . Labo r t o instal l th e ne w doubl e mechanica l sea l i na sho pare a wa s estimate da s $370 . Actua l cost s fo r doubl e mechanica l seal s wil l var y greatly , dependin g onth e pum pshaf t diameter , th e materia l o f constructio no f th e seal , th e pum poperatin g pressur e an

dtemperature , an

dth e physica l an

dchemica l propertie s o f th e materia l t o b e pumped . Auxiliar y equipment , suc ha s a coole r fo r contro l o f th e temperatur e o f th e liqui duse dt o flus hth e sea l ma y b e required , a t a cos t o f approximatel y $1,240 ; also , anindividualize dpressurize dpo t system may b e require dt o maintai npressur e onth e liqui duse dt o flus heac hdoubl e seal , a t a cos t o f approximatel y $300 , accordin g t o recen t vendo r information . Cos t o f a closed-ven t system i s estimate dt o b e $5,190 . Se e th e enclosure s fo r th e source s o f th e abov e cos t information . Additiona l cos t informatio ni s expecte dfro m tw o othe r pum

po r sea l vendors .

### TABLE . PUM P SEAL COST S Ite m Cos t (1s t

quarte r 1990 ) Cos t Basi s 

# TOT " Sea l Cos t base dontelephon e cal l t o sea l vendors . Singl e Mechanica l Sea l Doubl e Mechanica l Sea l $1,46 0 (retrofitted ) Sea l Cos t = $1,020 . (Base don telephon e cal l t o sea l vendors. ) Fiel dInstallatio n- $440 . (Update dfro

m NSP S BI D usin g BL S Produce r Pric e Index. ) $83 0 (new )

Barrie r Flui d System fo r Doubl e Mechanica l Seal s $1,54 0

Closed-Ven t Syste m fo r Doubl e Mechanica l Seal s $5,190/pum p Sea l Cos t = $1,020 . (Base do n telephon e cal l t o sea l vendors. ) Singl e Sea l Credi t = $560 . Sho pInstallatio n= $370 . (Update d fro m NSP S BI D usin g BL S Produce r Pric e Index. ) Pressurize dReservoi r System • $300 . (Base dontelephon e cal l t o vendors. ) System Coole r = $1,240 . (Update d fro m NSP S BI D usin g C E Plan t Cos t Indice s fo r Pipes , Valves , Fittings . Base doninstallatio no f a 12 2 m lengt ho f 5. 1 c

m diam . schedul e 4 0 carbo nstee l pip e a t a cos t o f $8,04 0 (update dfro m NSP S BI D usin g C E Plan t Cos t Indice s fo r Pipes , Valves , Fittings) , plu s thre e 5. 1 c m cas t stee l plu g valve s an

don e meta l gaug e flame arresto r a t a cos t o f $2,33 0 (update dfro

m NSP S BI D usin g C E Plan t Cos t Indice s fo r Pipes , Valves , Fittings) . Thes e cost s includ e connectio no f th e degassin g reservoi r t o a

nexistin g enclose d combustio ndevic e o r vapo r recover y header . Therefore , cos t o f a contro l devic e adde dspecificall y t o contro l th e degassin g vent s i s no t included . Assume s tha t two pump s ar e connecte dt o a singl e degassin g vent . IS3S33 3P.4 4



### TABLE . EQUIPMEN T COS T FORCONTRO L O F EMISSION S FRO M A PUM P SEAL (1989-199 0 Dollars )

Retrofitte dNew Capita l Cost s Dua l Sea l Barrie r f Ven t System

5,19 0 5,19 0 Dua l Sea l (Footnote s A,B ) 1,46 0 83 0 Barrie r Flui d1,54 0 1,54 0

Tota l 8,19 0 7,56 0

Annua l Cost s 

### 66 0 250 85 0 160 33 0 33 0

250 85 0 160 30 0 Dua l Sea l (Footnot e C ) Barrie r Flui d(Footnot e D ) Ven t System

(Footnot e D ) Quarterl y

LDA R(Footnot e E ) Miscellaneou s Charge s (Footnot e F )

Tota l (Footnot e G ) 2,25 0 1,89 0

A . Retrofitte dsea l costs : Sea l cos t = $1,020 , Fiel dinstallatio ncos t - $440 . B . New sea l costs : Sea l cos t = $1,020 , Sho pinstallatio ncos t = $370 , Single-sea l credi t * $560 . C . Base don2-yea r sea l lif e an d1 0 percen t interes t (CRF - 0.58 ) fo r dua l sea l an d10-yea r amortizatio nperio dan d1 0 percen t interes t (CR F - 0.163 ) fo r installatio ncharges . D . Base do

n10-yea r equipmen t lif e an d1 0 percen t interes t (CRF = > 0.163) . E . Base doninformatio nfro m a LDA Rcontractor . F . Base don4 percen t o f tota l capitalist s (se e Pag e 8-1 0 o f th e BID) . G . Cost s d o no t includ e credit s fo r recovere dproduct .P.4 5



### TABLE . NE T ANNUALIZE DCOS T O F EQUIPMEN T FO RCONTRO L O F EMISSION S FRO

M PUMP SEAL S (1989-199 0 Dollars )
tassasssssss : 

### Retrofitte dNew
Gros s Annualize dCos t {$/yr) $2,25 0 $1,89 0 EmissionReductio n(Mg/yr ) (Footnot e A. ) 0.4 1 0.4 1 Produc t Recover y

Credi t ($/yr ) (200 ) (200 ) (Footnot e B. ) Ne t Annualize dCos t ($/yr ) $2,05 0 $1,69 0

A . Averag e Emissio nFacto r fo r ligh t liqui dpump s = 0.049 4 kg/hr/source . Assume s 8,76 0 hour s operatio npe r year . Assume s 95 % reductio ni npum psea l emission s attributabl e t o dua l mechanica l seal . B . Produc t value da t $480/Mg . Update dfro m NSP S AI Dusing Burea uo f Labo r Statistic s Produce r Pric e Index .

# ATTACHMEN T1 1

TABL E 1-A PORTABL E MONITO RRESPONS E FACTOR S ALPHABETICA L LIS T O F AL L COMPOUND S WIT H RESPONS E FACTOR S

COMPOUN D
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan e 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan e 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan e 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan e 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan e 1,1,2-Trichloroethan e 1,1,2-Trichloroethan e 1,1-Dimethy l hydrazin e 1,1- D im e thy 1 hydra z ine 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzen e 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzen e 1,3-Butadien e 1,4-Dichlorobenzen e 1,4-Dioxan e 1,4-Dioxan e 1,4-Dioxan e 2-Nitropropan e 2-Nitropropan e Ac e taldeh^d s Acetonitril e Acetonitril e Acetonitril e Acetophenon e Acrolei n Acrolei n Acryli c Aci d Acryli c Aci d Acryli c Aci d Acrylonitril e Acrylonitril e Acrylonitril e Acrylonitril e Acrylonitril e Anilin e Benzen e Benzen e Benzen e Benzen e Benzen e Benzen e Benzy l chlorid e R F

1.0 0 1.0 0 4.8 3 7.8 9 6.0 6 0.8 5 1.2 5 5.0 0 1.0 3 1.0 0 1.2 1 3.1 3 0.8 8 3.3 3 1.5 8 1.4 8 1.4 3 1.0 5 4.0 0 1.4 3 0.9 4 0.9 5 18.7 0 0. 2 3.7 3 9.0 9 4.6 5 4.5 9 .1.0 4 1.4 3 2.0 0 0.9 6 0.9 7 2.6 3 1.4 0 1.2 8 1.2 7 0.6 7 0.2 1 0.2 9 15.3 0 ppm

v

1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 35. 8 1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 31. 7 1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 24. 0 26. 4 31. 2 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 Contro l

M M ' P M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M * M M M M M * M M M M M M * M * M * M M M M Sourc e

Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Foxbor o Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n

* * - Xylen e respons e factor s ar e averag e o f o, m an d p isomer s M - Base d o nmethan e M * - Respons e correcte d t o methan e N/ F - No t feasibl e t o determin eO Q i r- 1 w H J 

## 3 H C O o H C J < b aNSE
o cu C O w
c 4 o HLEMONI


## 3 H O i O O aFACTORSONSE

cu C O w oi XWIT

C O Q P O O a a s o oOFALL

H C O M a J 

## 3 C J M H W p Q ^ J 3 3 tu -* •4 0)

t > W 3 ontrolS

o C J

> s a a

• a c d

a £ 3 o P a a s o C J lu lu c

cfl •r- ( T J a ) 0 4

t u O V J O X > X O t u

a s

o o o o t- 4

o w \ o z

I- H J N c 0 ) X ! a •r H C Q Z

a > T J
• H <4 H r- 1 3 C O •r H T J c O X > VI C d C J zide

V j o I- H X ! o «f l V j U < U 4 J C O X ) U i d C J o r Hide
u o i- H rC o (f l ) H u a ) 4- > C o x > VH cf l C J C <f l
• H T J Cf l 0 4

S 3

o o o o o r H

0 0 C M

r H C Mide

V J O r- H X\ o c d V J 4- > a > 4- > e O J 3 M c d C J O V J O X ) X O t u

S

o o o o r H

o i n o

a ) C a ) N C 0 ) X t O V J O r- HXC J c c d
• H T J c d o4

3 S

o o o o o r H

v£ > c o o

c u a c u N c a > J 3 O V J O r- 1 r C C J c c d T H T J c d a :

S S

o o o o o r H

0 0 c o o

c u C 0 ) N c 11 ) X I O V J O i- H

. C C J o V J C o c a
, n T H X T J o c d C u 0 4

a s a s

o o o ' o o o o o r H O r H

> * 0 0 i n ^

r- 4 < • c

c d •r H T J c d 0 4

a d

o o o o o r H

0 0 C M o \

a a B E V J O O <4 H sn O O V J V J O O i- H i- H o

<4 H O V J o r- 1 x : x : x : C J u C J o

V J O Xt X o U a

a s

o o o o l" H

o o
r H

C U e 0 ) s 3 C J O V J O
• O X O t u

a s

o o o o r H

C O < t

r- J

d ) e 0 ) B 3 C J C c d •r H T J c d 0 4

a s

o o o o o r- H

O l CT>

r- H

C U e c u s 3 C J o C V J c d o •r H X ) T J X c d o o 4 t u

s s a s

o o o o o o o o O i- H r H

r - <aO O Os

r H C M

C U T J •r H B O C C V

J c d c d o
• H T J X> T J T J X c d c d o 0 4 0 4 t u

a s a s a s

o o o o o o o o o o o o O O r H r H r H

OS Os o oo I- H i n n ^ N

C U C U T J T J • r l .i H B B cf l c d cfl c u 

## B O <4H

r- H J ^ 0 ) JZ C 4 J C U C U B S 3 -r H u a H B *-

> V J V J c

d O O i- H c

c d •r H T J c d 0 4

a s

o o o o o r- H

C M r-~ . o

C U u c d r H <* H taH >- , J>~

, VJ " I - H r- H O ^ ^ « x : x : • U 4 J i- H < » < u > , sax : •r H T H U o o u i V J

O c d

r- H r N x\ 4- 1 U J c c d T H T J c d o 4

a s

o o o o o r- H

r~ - r ~ o

C U u c d i- H o V J C C o c d c d X t i H -r H X T J T J o c d c d lu 0i Oi

a s a s a s

o o o o o o o o o o o o r H O O i- H i- H
O c o O O r ~ r» » r H O O

c n c u c u o o o

I H V J V J o o o X ) Xt Xt X X X o o o C u t u t u

a s a s

o o o o o o o o i- H i- H

O r » (u O

V J C C o c d c d

, 0
. H T H X T J T J o c d c d U
. o 4 0 4

a s a s a s

o o o o o o o o o o o o r- H O O r H r-4

C O C M V O 0«\<tN< t ••z C M r- H

C U 0 ) T j T J -r H •r H V J B O r- H O i- H O J H X\ O C C C X > O S N ( U C U C U r> S N N N V J O c d i- H c c c c n c u c u X « X ) X )

r- H r- H r- H •r H .r H r- H

T J T J 0 0 c u c u c n c c c 0 ) c u c u •- H i- H r H >i^>>>>>>^ ^ x\ 4- > U J x : x ; x : x ! x\

x ; 4 J 4- > 4 J ( d U U U l l u u u u r H C M C M

c u e n < u TJ TJ T j • I H •r H T H X X X O O O C U c u C U c c c 0 ) 0 1 c

u r- H I- H r- H :* , ^ > .

. c x x : 4- 1 «- ) 4- 1 U J U J U ] O

V J O Xt X o u ,

C u o u o X ) X o U a

( u o V J O X > X O Lu

a s

o o o o r H

C O W c o z

C U T J > N 4 3 C U T J i- H c d 

## B o U a Z

C U T J •r H V J T J ^ 

## • g c d o • H 0 0

r H O c cf l c c d
• H T J c d 0 4

a s

o o o o o i- H

O i c o

- J

r- H O C Cf l c c d i H T J cf l 0 4

a s

o o o o o r H

Os so m

i- H o G cf l cu-x : x : x : r- H cf l a s 4 J 0 ) a s 4- > 0 ) a s 4 J < U a s o V J C C o c d c d XI T H T H X T J T J o c d c d U a 0 4 0 4

a s a s a s

O O O o o o o o o o o o r H O O r- H i- H

o o > * m C M - * r ^

r H r- H r H

C U < U < U c

c d •r H T J c d 0 4 

## £

0 0 O C M

0 0 C M C M o V J O X > X o C u

a s

o o o o r H

i n o « o c c d
• H TJ cf l 0 4

a s

o o o o o r H

OS r- ~ o c cf l i H T J c d 0 4

a s

o o o o o r H

0 0 • o



## BBB B o o O T J T J T J <4 H <HH 4 H
» 4 i H T l u u u o o o r- H i- H i- H x: xi xi o o o
r H r- H i- H r N > > P-
. x : x : x : 4 J 4 J 4 J 0)0)0 ) a s a s a s o I H o i- H X S O
r- H >s r C 4 J 0 ) a s o V J O i- H x: o
r- H 5> s X ! 4- ) C U a s O V J o r- H X o i- H > S x\ 4- > C U a s o <4 H o V J o r- H r C o
r- H 5 ^ x\ u c n a s C

D '- ' c n s o t o ^ H a
T J co,ma

« H o d ) 0 0avera

C U t- 1 cfl C O V J O 4 Jnsefac *ane
o x : a 4- > C 4 C U V J C U c 0 )
•- H > S X 1 * * C U a c o T J C U C Q c d C Q 1 a s 0 ) c c d X 0) 4- > C C U - H 

### a 

# s O 0 ) 4- > 4- >rectedetode

V J I- H O X ) O "r H 0 ) C U c d C O 0 ) C <« H o a « C O o C U z 0 4 1 I b a * \ a s zP.4 8

TABL E 1- C PORTABL E MONITO RRESPONS E FACTOR S ALPHABETICA L LIS T O F AL L COMPOUND S WIT H RESPONS E FACTOR S

COMPOUN D Methy l ethy l keton e Methy l ethy l keton e Methy l ethy l keton e Methy l isobuty l keton e Methy l isobuty l keton e Methy l methacrylat e Methy l methacrylat e Nitrobenzen e Nitrobenzen e Nitrobenzen e o-Creso l o-Creso l o-Creso l Pheno l Pheno l Pheno l Propionaldehyd e Propionaldehyd e Propylen e oxid e Propylen e oxid e Propylen e oxid e S tyren e Styren e Styren e Styren e Tetrachloroethylen e Tetrachloroethylen e Tetrachloroethylen e Tetrachloroethylen e Toluen e Toluen e Toluen e Toluen e Triethylamin e Triethylamin e Triethylamin e Viny l Acetat e Viny l Acetat e Viny l Acetat e Viny l Acetat e R F 1.2 5 0.5 7 0.6 4 1.0 0 0.5 6 2.0 0 0.9 9 N/ F 1.0 2 29.7 7 0.9 8 0.9 6 0.9 5 0.4 4 1.8 5 11.7 5 1.1 4 1.1 9 0.7 4 0.8 3 0.8 0 1.1 8 1.2 5 4.2 2 4.1 6 1.5 5 1.8 0 1.4 3 3.1 6 0.8 9 0.9 1 0.3 9 0.3 3 1.4 3 0.4 6 0.5 1 2.0 0 1.2 7 0.3 9 1.3 1 ppm

v 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 37. 9 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 28. 9 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 19. 2 21. 4 1000. 0 10000. 0 22. 6 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 Contro l

M M M M M M M
M M M M M M * M M M M M * M M M M M M M * M * M M M * M M M M M M • M M M M Sourc e Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Radia n

* * - Xylen e respons e factor s ar e averag e o f o, m and p . isomer s M - Base d o nmethan e M * - Respons e correcte d t o methan e N/ F - No t feasibl e t o determin e

TABL E 1- DP.4 9

TABL E 1-

D PORTABL E MONITOR RESPONS E FACTOR S ALPHABETICA

L LIS T O F AL L COMPOUND S WIT H RESPONS E FACTOR S
COMPOUN D 

### R

F ppm

v Contro l Sourc e Viny l Chlorid e Viny l Chlorid e Viny l Chlorid e Vinyliden e chlorid e Vinyliden e chlorid e Vinyliden e chlorid e Xylene s Xylenes* * Xylenes* * 2.8 6 0.8 4 0.6 5 2.5 0 1.1 2 1.1 5 0.8 7 0.9 8 0.9 8 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 1000. 0 10000. 0 10000. 0 

### M

M M M M M M M M Radia n Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n Foxbor o Radia n Radia n

* * - Xylen e respons e factor s ar e averag e o f o, man d p isomer s M - Base d o n methan e M * - Respons e correcte d t o methan e N/ F - No t feasibl e t o determin eP.5 0

t r ' v* 

# r f

Tabl e 2 Portabl e Monito r Respons e Factor s Compound s o n CA

AVolatil e Lis t Unteste d wit h OV A
COMPOUN D R F ppm v Contro l 2,4-Dinitropheno l 2,4-Dinitrotoluen e 2,4-Toluen e diamin e 4,4-Methylenedianilin e Acetamid e Acrylamid e Benzotrichlorid e Caprolacta

m Chloroaceti c aci d Chloropren e Dichloroethy l ethe r Diethy l sulfat e Dimethy l sulfat e Ethy l chlorid e Ethyliden e dichlorid e Hexachloroethan e Hydroquinon e Isophoron e Methy l bromid e mixe d Creso l m-Creso l N,N-Diethy l anilin e o-Anisidin e o-Toluidin e Phosgen e Phthali c anhydrid e Propylen e dichlorid e p-Creso l p-Phenylenediamin e Quinon e