alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                               1
<CASH>                                                                   46,177
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            46,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              4,367
<INVENTORY>                                                              44,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        147,721
<PP&E>                                                                   38,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           17,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          242,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    29,165
<BONDS>                                                                  93,083
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                    143
<OTHER-SE>                                                              120,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            242,453
<SALES>                                                                  43,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         43,632
<CGS>                                                                    30,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            30,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         11,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        1,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           1,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               (391)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                         637
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-K/A of
MUZAK FINANCE CORP and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001086484
<NAME>                        MUZAK FINANCE CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Christian Doran BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-996

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

SHAWN TYSON

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 4

- 0 410

May 1 , 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.1 41(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for

Sarasota County; Thomas W. Krug

, Judge.

Shawn Tyson , pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN

- YOUAKIM, and LABRIT

, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
0

102030405060708090

24‐hour PM2.5 Deisgn Values (μg/m

3

)

1997 24‐hour PM2.5 NAAQS: South Coast Nonattainment Area Trends 2001‐2013

Azusa Burbank Los Angeles (Main St.) Pico Rivera Pico Rivera #2 Pasadena 199
0

5

101520253035

Annual Design Value (μg/m

3

)

1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS: Pasadena & Nearby Monitor Trends 2001‐2013

Azusa Burbank Los Angeles (Main St.) Pico Rivera Pico Rivera #2 Pasadena 19
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,577-01

EX PARTE BEN LEE HENLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W11-61328-L(A) IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 5

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unlawful

possession of a firearm and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Henley v. State, No. 05-13-00053-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas June 5, 2013)

(not designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. On

June 10, 2014, the trial court entered a timely order designating issues. Applicant has alleged facts

that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte
2

Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts

are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order counsel to respond

to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use anymeans set out

in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its

personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in response to Applicant’s

claims. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it

deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 28, 2015

Do not publish
EX PARTE Ralph LINGO

CR-16-0527

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
#### Stuart Glashow et al., Appellants, v Linden Towers Cooperative #4, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[770 NYS2d 642]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated June 14, 2002, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants Linden Towers Coop*551erative #4, Inc., Arlene Fleishman, Eleanor Mishanie, Seymour Albín, Alan Grabkowitz, Leo Janson, Judy Lippel, Marty Dinnerstein, and Al Schulman.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ cause of action to recover damages for malicious prosecution insofar as asserted against the respondents. After the respondents made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether they sustained a special injury and whether the respondents acted with malice *(see Sirianni v Rafaloff,*284 AD2d 447 [2001]; *cf. Dudick v Gulyas,*277 AD2d 686 [2000]; *Honzawa v Honzawa,*268 AD2d 327 [2000]).

The plaintiffs’ cause of action to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional distress was also properly dismissed against the respondents since the plaintiffs failed, after the respondents made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the complained of conduct was “so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community” *(Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 303 [1983] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Walentas v Johnes,*257 AD2d 352 [1999]; *Dillon v City of New York,*261 AD2d 34 [1999]; *Harville v Lowville Cent. School Dist.,*245 AD2d 1106 [1997]; *Leibowitz v Bank Leumi Trust Co. of N.Y.,*152 AD2d 169, 181-182 [1989]). Altman, J.P., Cozier, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.13


Execution Version



CREDIT FACILITY WAIVER AGREEMENT


This Credit Facility Waiver Agreement (“Agreement”) is dated as of February 20, 2019 between BP Midstream Partners LP (the “Borrower”) and North America Funding Company (the “Lender”).


WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender executed that certain Short Term Credit Facility Agreement dated as of October 27, 2017 (the “Facility Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the Borrower, pursuant to the terms of the Facility Agreement, delivered a borrowing request (the “2018 Utilisation Request”) effective October 1, 2018 (the “Utilisation Date”) for an original principal amount of $468 million (the “Loan”) with a loan repayment date of March 29, 2019 (the “Original Loan Repayment Date”);


WHEREAS, the Lender has agreed to a waiver to certain terms of the Facility Agreement and 2018 Utilisation Request as more fully described herein;


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows (terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the Facility Agreement):


		
	1.
	Loan Repayment Date.  The Original Loan Repayment Date is hereby waived and from the date of this Agreement the definition of the Original Loan Repayment Date shall be amended and modified to mean April 1, 2020 (the “Amended Loan Repayment Date”).




		
	2.
	Payment of Interest.  The Borrower shall pay accrued Interest on the Loan from the Utilisation Date to the Original Loan Repayment Date on March 29, 2019 and thereafter the Borrower shall pay accrued Interest on each Fee Payment Date and the remaining accrued Interest shall be paid on the Amended Loan Repayment Date.




		
	3.
	No other waivers.  Except as agreed in herein, there are no other waivers or amendments to the terms of the Facility Agreement.




		
	4.
	Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of New York.




		
	5.
	Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and this has the same effect as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this Agreement.




	
			
	BP Midstream Partners, LP
	 
	North America Funding Company

	By: BP Midstream Partners GP LLC,
	 
	 

	Its general partner
	 
	By: /s/ Thu Dang

	 
	 
	Name: Thu Dang

	By: /s/ Craig W. Coburn
	 
	Title: Treasurer

	Name: Craig W. Coburn
	 
	 

	Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                           Immtech International, Inc.

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Immtech International, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T.
Stephen Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                          /s/ T. Stephen Thompson
                          -----------------------
                          Name:  T. Stephen Thompson
                          Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
                          Date:  November 14, 2003
Eduardo Francisco Chirinos GUERRERO, Appellant, v. Erika Maria Brain BEDOYA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-43

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 7, 2018]

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Kevin Coyle Colbert, Miami, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Ciklin and Levine, JJ., concur.
EX PARTE Carlton Rayman EDWARDS

1160152 (CR-15-0414)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

Cert. denied.
Demetrius T. JOHNSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 15, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

SALTER, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ., concur.
Spencer Keon WHITE v. STATE

CR-16-0396

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos COLMENARES-MARTINEZ, also known as Jonathan Morell-Roman, Defendant-Appellant

No. 15-41548 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Carlos Colmenares-Martinez, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Colmenares-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Colmenares-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See 5th Cir.*R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00312

- CV

Luis and Janeth MORENO , individually and on behalf of their daughter G

. M

. , Appellants

v.

Rosa VIDA

Rosa VIDA

,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT000802 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 12, 2015

DISMISSED

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, who has not opp osed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant s

. See id. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
National Archives and Records Administration

----------------------------------~--

Office of the Federal Register

•

January 4, 20 I0

FAA

SOOindependence Avenue, SW

Room 915 J, Regulations DivIsion

Washington, DC 20.59]

ATiN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The material listed in the attachm_e~ll is approved for incorporation by reference in 14 eFR Par! 39.

This approval is contingemupon the final rule containing any language changes, wbJCh were agreed upon by

our stark The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) ]5 effective on the effective dme of your

final ntlc. If you wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

1. Publish notice of the chimgc in the Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edilion is on file allhc Office of the Federal Register; and

3. NOlify me in writing of the change.

/ J

jiJ4~AYMOND

1;~t1~

A. MOSLEY

Oiredor of the Federlll Register

Federal Regisler Attomey/ff}j

Attachment

us lnail address: 3601 Adelphi Road, Cot1ege Park, MD 20740-6001

Office location: 300 North CapilolSlTeel, NW,Suite 700, \'I"ashington, DC 20002-4244

Fn1cr,li Regi~ler web sites: http://www_archiveS_f,ov/fICderaJ_rC'gister /Iud http://www.gpoacccs5.gov/nar'1
illcorporation by Referellce

Docket No. F.4.A-J007-0096: Dilw:rorate ldelliifier lOOI-NE-39-AD; Ameudmei1f 39-16141: AD 2009-26-06

AlIiedSignal Service Bulletin (SB)

ALFILF 73-1002

Revision 1 0312411997

Dock,,! No. F.4.A.-l007-176X7: Directorate ldem{{ier 1000-NE-41-AD: AmendmeJ1l 39-16144: AD 1009-16-09

GE Aircraft Engines Service Builetin CF34 10/2712008

BJ SIB 72-A0234

GE Aircraft Engines Service Builetin CF34 10/27/2008

BJ SIB 72-A0235

GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- 10/27/2008

AL S/6 72 A0253

GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- Revision 4 10/27/2008

AL SIB 72-A0233

GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- 10/27/2008

AL SIB 72-A0252

GE Aircraft Engines Service Bullet\n CF34- Revision 4 1012712008

BJ SIB 72-A0212

Dockel No. FAA-1009-1122: Directorare ID 2009-NM-153·AD: Amendment 39-16160: AD ]()08-IO-(}6 Ri

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

Boeing Commercial Airplanes

t~dl1f('(f //4/1010

Section 9, Boeing 747- ReviSion Aprii

400 Maintenance 2008

Planning Data (MPDl

Document D62U4oo-9

Section 9, Boeing 747- Revision March

400 Maintenance 2009

Planning Data (MPD)

Document, D621U400-9

0412008

0312009

Pag'- I ofl
Exhibit



                                            





Exhibit 10.14




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
JANUARY 2019
The following is a description of non-employee director (“Director”) compensation for Fulton Financial Corporation (the “Company”), effective as of January 1, 2019.
The company pays cash fees to each Director on a quarterly basis as follows: 
		
	•
	    $70,000 annual cash retainer for all Directors.


		
	•
	    $30,000 additional annual cash retainer for the Lead Director.


		
	•
	$12,500 additional annual cash retainer for the Chair of all standing committees (Audit, Executive, Human Resources, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk), except that if the Lead Director is also serving as chair of the Executive Committee, no cash retainer shall be paid for service as Chair of the Executive Committee.


		
	•
	No additional fees will be paid to a Director for attending a Board meeting or a standing committee meeting.


		
	•
	Cash fees currently paid to Directors serving on the Special Joint Board Compliance Committee (“SJBCC”) will continue to be paid to SJBCC members as follows:


•$1,000 per meeting attended by a SJBCC member.
•$12,500 annual cash fee retainer for the SJBCC Chair.
Each Director is granted an annual equity-based retainer award as follows:
		
	•
	 All equity-based awards are made under the Company’s 2011 Directors’ Equity Participation Plan, as amended (the “Plan”)


		
	•
	Directors elected at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders shall be granted, as of the first of the month immediately following the meeting, under the Plan, an award of Director Restricted Stock Units (“DSU”) having an award value of $60,000, or such other value as determined by the Board.


		
	 
	A Director who joins the Board effective as of any other date shall be granted, as of such other date, a DSU award based on the award value of the most recent annual grant prorated to reflect the number of months (rounded up to the next whole month) remaining until the next annual meeting of shareholders. 


		
	•
	 The number of shares of common stock underlying a DSU award shall be determined by dividing the award value by the closing price of Company common stock on the principal stock exchange on the date of grant (rounded up to the nearest whole share). 


		
	•
	 Each equity-based grant will vest and be paid based on twelve months of service or in accordance with such other vesting schedule as determined by the Board, unless a Director has properly elected to defer payment and receipt of the common stock shares underlying such DSU award until they retire from the Company’s Board.


Directors are also entitled to reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred in connection with attending Company meetings and educational conferences.
Directors receive a Company paid $50,000.00 term life insurance policy, with the benefit payable upon death.
Richard Lynn STEARNS-MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-41

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.