alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

Alliente, Inc. (Delaware) 

Ariba Australia Pty Ltd. (Australia) 

Ariba Belgium N.V. (Belgium) 

Ariba Canada Inc. (Canada) 

Ariba (China) Limited (Hong Kong) 

Ariba Czech s.r.o. (Czech Republic) 

Ariba Deutschland GmbH (Germany)

Ariba France, SAS (France) 

Ariba Holdings, Inc. (CaymanIslands) 

Ariba Iberia, S.L. (Spain) 

Ariba India Pvt. Ltd.(India) 

Ariba International Inc. (Delaware) 

AribaInternational Holdings, Inc. (Delaware) 

Ariba International Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) 

Ariba Investment Company, Inc. (Delaware) 

Ariba Italia Srl (Italy) 

Ariba Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) 

Ariba Slovak Republic s.r.o. (SlovakRepublic) 

Ariba Software Technology Services (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (China) 

Ariba Switzerland GmbH (Switzerland) 

Ariba Technologies India Private Limited (India) 

Ariba Technologies Ireland Limited (Ireland) 

Ariba Technologies NetherlandsB.V. (Netherlands) 

Ariba UK Limited (UK) 

FreeMarkets GmbH(Switzerland) 

FreeMarkets International Holding Inc. de Mexico, de S. de R. L. de C. V. (Mexico) 

FreeMarkets Ltda. (Brazil) 

Nihon Ariba KK (Japan) 

Procuri Europe, Ltd (UK) 

Surplus Record, Inc. (Delaware) 

Tradex Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
DEVAN LOWE, INC. v. Bobby Lee LEDBETTER and Ledbetter Enterprises, LLC

1150359

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

Affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                     Ending
Class          Interest          Principal         Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>               <C>             <C>               <C>
A1            4296221.04          7319778                0       756452851.88
A10             93015.04                0                0           16536000
A11               219465                0                0           39016000
A12            166275.04                0                0           29560000
A13            413775.04                0                0           73560000
A14             26666.64                0                0            4000000
A15                32500                0                0            6000000
A16                35000                0                0            6000000
A17            4337846.3       6690356.03                0       764482319.55
A18           2073572.36       2980569.47                0       379832789.23
A19           2233077.93       2980569.47                0       379832789.23
A2            3429506.74       4747022.56                0       604943064.51
A20            433376.64                0                0           80008000
A21              2137500                0                0          380000000
A3             121566.64                0                0           20840000
A4                 73800                0                0           13120000
A5                103040                0                0           17664000
A6                 89040                0                0           15264000
A7              79266.64                0                0           13120000
A8             163215.04                0                0           29016000
A9                239400                0                0           42560000
APO                    0         58668.05                0        38779051.88
AR                  0.56              100                0                  0
B1             516304.33         77842.38                0        91709590.85
B2             157130.24         23690.28                0        27910575.05
B3              67303.07         10147.18                0        11954843.69
B4              67347.94         10153.94                0        11962813.59
B5              38183.29          5756.84                0         6782381.32
B6              51589.15          6969.54           808.47         9163628.94


</TABLE>
Jemiral MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1209

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas E. Mara, as Chief Executive Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1)the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 10, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,115,962
<SECURITIES>                                 2,248,311
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,018,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,757,130
<PP&E>                                       1,410,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               (998,293)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,273,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          649,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       565,715
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,970,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,273,291
<SALES>                                        527,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               610,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  957,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (347,242)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (19,679)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (327,563)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (327,563)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
James D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0827

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

James D. Smith, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-31498 and 333-31492) of Switchboard
Incorporated of our report dated February 1, 2001 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 1, 2001 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2001
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40762

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL OGWOKA SIRINGI,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-3-1

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Ogwoka Siringi has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Siringi has filed a response. The record is insufficiently

developed to allow consideration at this time of Siringi’s claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal

when they have not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 1, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 09-40762 Document: 00511068721 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2010
No. 09-40762

2

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Siringi’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Siringi’s motions for a hearing, for a restraining order, and for leave to

file documents are DENIED.

Case: 09-40762 Document: 00511068721 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2010
#### William Conrad WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POLK COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; State of Iowa, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-2176

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 15, 2016

Filed: November 28, 2016

William Conrad White, Pro Se

John Barry McCormally, Assistant Attorney General, Iowa Department of Justice, Des Moines, IA, for Defendants-Ap-pellees

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William White appeals after the district court1 dismissed his action seeking a ruling that his 1985 state-court conviction was void. In the district court, he sought a writ of coram nobis, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651.

*903Upon careful de novo review, *see Adams v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.,*813 F.3d 1151, 1154 (8th Cir. 2016), we conclude that the dismissal was proper. Because White was challenging a state-court judgment, the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant a writ of coram nobis. *See Finkelstein v. Spitzer,*455 F.3d 131, 133-34 (2d Cir. 2006) (per curiam). In addition, White could not invoke section 1651 as an independent source of jurisdiction. *See Ark. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, P.A.,*551 F.3d 812, 820-21 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
EPA – PCA Meeting 

Thursday, September 15, 2011 

EPA Office, RTP, NC 

10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. EDT 

Tentative Meeting Agenda 

Dial In: (888) 387-8686, then 4089494 

1) Introductions 

2) Review/Discuss CISWI Data Issues 

a) Size of Actual CISWI Data Pool 

b) Specific Concerns with D/F data interpretation 

c) Concerns with other Emission Limits, including limited consideration of 

variability 

d) Too few data to quantify variability 

3) Need to Revise Rule to Correct Ingredients Issue 

4) Implementation Concerns (Timing, Conflicts with NESHAP, etc.) 

5) Schedule for CISWI Rule Changes 

6) Other Business 

7) Adjourn 
From: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov, Amy Hambrick/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/12/2012 03:52 PM

Subject: Fw: Tentative Agendas for Thursday Meetings

Here is info on the 9/15/11 meetings. There was a CISWI and a Cement NESHAP meeting. No one from the CISWI project team 

was available that day - so I filed in for the CISWI team at the meeting.

Keith W. Barnett 

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG 

919-541-5605 

----- Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2012 03:40 PM -----

From: O’Hare, Andrew <AOhare@cement.org>

To: David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/13/2011 04:13 PM

Subject: Tentative Agendas for Thursday Meetings

Gentlemen, 

Attached please find tentative agendas for the two meetings on Thursday at RTP, the first addressing the commercial and industrial solid waste 

incinerator (CISWI) rule (10 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.), the second addressing reconsideration of the portland cement national emission standard for 

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP -12:30 – 2:30 p.m.).

I would also appreciate it if you would arrange for a conference phone in the meeting room(s) so that PCA members unable to be present in 

person may participate by conference call. I am happy to host the call using my dial in number: (888) 387-8686, then 4089494. I have also noted 

this dial in number on the tentative agendas. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to see you all on Thursday.

Regards,

Andy 

Andrew T. O'Hare

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Portland Cement Association

500 New Jersey Avenue, 7th Floor

Washington, DC 20001

Office: (202) 408-9494

Fax: (202) 408-0877

Cell: (202) 270-0094

e-mail: aohare@cement.org 

(See attached file: EPA PCA Meeting September 15, 2011 CISWI.docx)(See attached 

file: EPA PCA Meeting September 15 2011 NESHAP.docx)
Raymond Donovan WILLIAMS v. STATE

2160578

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### James CRANGLE; Tara Rose Allen Rooney-Crangle, Petitioners-Appellants, v. EASTERN REGIONAL JAIL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6146

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

J.K. Crangle, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants James Crangle and his wife, Tara Rose Allen Rooney-Crangle, appeal the district court’s order dismissing then-civil action for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing them to complete and submit court-approved forms. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Appellants’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Appellants forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *152
      *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004), Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny the pending motions for a writ of certiorari and for an extraordinary writ. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JODEN ROCCO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 211 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

2008-7077 

MELODY SIMPSON, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

Thomas J. Reed, Widener University School of Law, of Wilmington, Delaware, 

argued for claimant-appellant. 

Meredyth D. Cohen, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondentappellee. With her on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, 

Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Assistant Director. Of counsel 

on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Martie S. 

Adelman, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of 

Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Judge Bruce E. Kasold 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-7077 

MELODY SIMPSON, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

 

in CASE NO(S) 06-0552. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (BRYSON, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.) 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED: _October 10, 2008__ / s / Jan Horbaly

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6167 

To provide additional housing protections for survivors of domestic violence, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mrs. SYKES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide additional housing protections for survivors of 

domestic violence, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Break Free From Do5 mestic Violence Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR 

7 EARLY LEASE TERMINATION. 

8 Section 41411 of the Violence Against Women Act 

9 of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12491) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6167 IH

1 ‘‘(h) PROHIBITION ON THE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR

2 EARLY LEASE TERMINATION.— 

3 ‘‘(1) VOLUNTARY EXIT.—An applicant for or 

4 tenant of housing assisted under a covered housing 

5 program may voluntarily exit a lease for housing 

6 earlier than the end date of such lease on the basis 

7 that the applicant or tenant has been a victim of do8 mestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or 

9 stalking. 

10 ‘‘(2) FEE PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any 

11 lease agreement, an applicant or tenant described in 

12 paragraph (1) may not be charged a fee for exiting 

13 a lease for housing earlier than the end date of such 

14 lease on the basis described in paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
O.P., a Juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Opinion issued August 4, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00229-CV

NO. 01-16-00230-CV

———————————

IN RE B.M., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

OPINION

Relator, B.M., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to vacate a 

“Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing” in the underlying trial court 

proceedings.

1

 

1 The proceeding underlying Cause No. 01-16-00229-CV is Case No. 2008-03683, 

In the Interest of J.L.F. and G.W.F., Children, in the 311th District Court of Harris 

County, the Honorable Alicia Franklin York presiding. The proceeding underlying 

Cause No. 01-16-00230-CV is Case No. 2015-42486, In the Interest of G.J.H., a 
We deny the petition and dismiss as moot relator’s motion for stay pending 

review of the petition for a writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.

Justice Jennings, dissenting.

 

Child, in the 311th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Alicia Franklin 

York presiding.
Andrew Miguel PERALTA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-739

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
CONSOLIDATED RESOURCE RECOVERY, INC., Appellant, v. Yuniel LEAL and J. Grez Transport, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-2071

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 1, 2018 Rehearing En Banc Denied May 30, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6240 

To modify a certain commercial zone in Texas to include Zapata County, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To modify a certain commercial zone in Texas to include 

Zapata County, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CAMERON, HIDALGO, 

4 STARR, AND WILLACY COUNTIES, TEXAS COM5 MERCIAL ZONE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

7 13902(c)(4)(A) of title 49, United States Code, Zapata 

8 County in Texas shall be considered part of the commer9 cial zone comprised of Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6240 IH

1 Willacy Counties in Texas for purposes of transportation 

2 of property under section 13506(b) of such title. 

3 (b) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out this section, 

4 the Secretary of Transportation shall consult with Federal 

5 agencies that have responsibilities over traffic between the 

6 United States and Mexico. 

7 (c) SUBMISSION OF PLAN.—Not later than 3 months 

8 after the date of enactment of this Act, the State of Texas 

9 shall submit to the Secretary a plan describing how the 

10 State will monitor commercial motor vehicle traffic and 

11 enforce safety regulations. 

12 (d) SAVINGS PROVISION.—Nothing in this section 

13 shall affect any action commenced or pending before the 

14 Secretary or Surface Transportation Board before the 

15 date of enactment of this Act. 

16 (e) COMMERCIAL ZONE DEFINED.—In this section, 

17 the term ‘‘commercial zone’’ means the area that is com18 prised of Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, Willacy, and Zapata 

19 Counties in Texas. 

20 (f) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take ef21 fect on the date that is 6 months after the date of enact22 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Felix Jesus IBARRA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Chad CHRONISTER, Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3681

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 06, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.