alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Major CALHOUN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE; Roschell Davis, Health Services Administrator, Individually and Officially; Kendis Archer, Medical Director (Former), Individually and Officially; Thomas Kevin Bredeman, Individually and Officially, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-4373

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: September 29, 2017

Filed: October 4, 2017

Major Calhoun, Pro Se

Jessica L. Liss, Amy J. White, Jackson *&*Lewis, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendants-Appellees

. Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Major Calhoun filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming defendants showed deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs with regard to the treatment Calhoun received for his *314injured right wrist. The district court1 granted defendants’ motion for summary-judgment upon finding that the record established, at most, negligence. Following careful de novo review of the record, which included evidence showing that Calhoun consistently received care when he sought treatment and that he eventually underwent a recommended surgical procedure to treat his symptoms, we agree with the district court that defendants are entitled to summary judgment and therefore affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-7493

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 05-7508

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus
- 2 -

KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.

(CR-02-70031)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006 

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Nos. 05-7462/7493, affirmed; No. 05-7508, dismissed by unpublished

per curiam opinion.

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to compel, motion for reconsideration,

motion for bond pending appeal, motion for an evidentiary hearing,

and motion to disqualify the United States Attorney. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court as to all complaints except the district court order

denying bail pending appeal. See United States v. Cabiness, 4:02-

CR-70031 (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2005); United States v. Cabiness, 4:02-

CR-70031 (W.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2005). Because the underlying appeals

lack merit, the appeal from the denial of bail (No. 05-7508) is

dismissed as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

Nos. 05-7462/7493 - AFFIRMED

No. 05-7508 - DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.





Date: May 28, 2010





/s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer
   E-4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
<CURRENCY>                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997                          
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996                          
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996                          
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                          
<CASH>                                          28,424                          
<SECURITIES>                                         0                          
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,091                          
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,906                          
<INVENTORY>                                     75,951                          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,921                          
<PP&E>                                          42,933                          
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,889                          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,106                          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,913                          
<BONDS>                                        135,909                          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                          
<PREFERRED>                                          0                          
<COMMON>                                           142                          
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,142                          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,106                          
<SALES>                                        118,691                          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,691                          
<CGS>                                           85,177                          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,177                          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,121                          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,526                          
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (841)                          
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (369)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (472)                          
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                          
<CHANGES>                                            0                          
<NET-INCOME>                                      (472)                          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                          
                                           


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 of rStar Corporation (File No. 333-89331 and File No. 333-65430) of
our report dated April 11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of StarBand Latin America (Holland) B.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, which report appears in the Form 10-K of rStar Corporation
(none of which aforementioned financial statements are separately presented
therein).

                                                    Yours Truly,

Amstelveen, the Netherlands                     KPMG Accountants N.V.

April 11, 2003
Alejandro CAMPILLO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 03, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 3:13 PM

To: 'bdeclet@measure32.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Measure, a 32 Advisors Company, LLC

Mr. Declet,

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 1602). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the proposed UAS

operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/18/15. If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-Q of NCI Building Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and3
    
    The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NCI Building Systems, Inc.
  /s/ Mark E. JohnsonMark E. JohnsonExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
- 1

- COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

OMAR CALDERON

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00139

- CR

Appeal from the

450 th District Court

of Travis C ounty, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- DC

- 20

- 904007 )

O R D E R

The Court received and filed the supplemental clerk’s record which w as requested by this

Court’s order dated August 7, 2020 . The supplemental clerk’s record now includes an order by the

trial court, dated September 10, 2020, finding good cause to allow appointed counsel to withdraw

from representing Appellant and permitting attorney Keith S. Hampton, retained counsel, to

subst itut e as new counsel. The appeal is therefore reinstated.

Additionally, t he Court hereby GRANTS both motions pending in this Court filed by

attorney Linda Icenhauer

- Ramirez, namely, the Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Appellate

Counsel and Substitution of Counsel, filed on June 15, 2020, and the Second Motion for Leave to

Withdraw as Appellate Counsel and Substitution of Counsel, filed on July 22, 2020

.

The Appellant’s brief is due October 1 2 , 2020.- 2

-

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 1 th day of Septembe r 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND 

 *

 *

 Petitioner * Misc. Docket AG 

 * 

v. * No. 43 

 *

MARILYN D. DIMAS * September Term, 2014 

 * 

 *

 Respondent * 

 

*********************************************

ORDER

 Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant 

to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent admits she committed professional misconduct 

in violation of Rule 1.15 and 8.1(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional 

Conduct, it is this 21st day of October, 2014, 

 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Marilyn D. Dimas, 

be and she is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective fortyfive (45) days from the date of this Order; and it is further 

 ORDERED, that, forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, the Clerk of this Court 

shall remove the name of Marilyn D. Dimas from the register of attorneys in the Court and 

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and clerks 

of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d). 

/s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. 

 Senior Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6062 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 617
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6062

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2024

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To restore the ability of the people of American Samoa to approve 
amendments to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a 
democratic act of self-determination, as authorized pursuant to an Act 
of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the 
territory to the President, and to the Secretary of the Interior under 
      Executive Order 10264, dated June 29, 1951, under which the 
Constitution of American Samoa was approved and may be amended without 
requirement for further congressional action, subject to the authority 
  of Congress under the Territorial Clause in article IV, section 3, 
              clause 2 of the United States Constitution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON AMENDMENTS TO OR MODIFICATIONS OF 
              THE CONSTITUTION OF AMERICAN SAMOA.

    Section 12 of Public Law 98-213 (48 U.S.C. 1662a) is repealed.
                                                       Calendar No. 617

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To restore the ability of the people of American Samoa to approve 
amendments to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a 
democratic act of self-determination, as authorized pursuant to an Act 
of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the 
territory to the President, and to the Secretary of the Interior under 
      Executive Order 10264, dated June 29, 1951, under which the 
Constitution of American Samoa was approved and may be amended without 
requirement for further congressional action, subject to the authority 
  of Congress under the Territorial Clause in article IV, section 3, 
              clause 2 of the United States Constitution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-36460 of eOn Communications Corporation on Form S-8 of ourreport dated August 29, 2002, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the Company’s change in its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform with FASB Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*, and an explanatory paragraph concerning the Company’s change in its method of accounting for the cost of certain inventories from the last-in, first-out methodto the first-in, first-out method, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of eOn Communications Corporation for the year ended July 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

October 29, 2003
Lee Allen NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-253

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:  December 7, 2015 | /s/ Robert E. Smith                          |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                               | Robert E. Smith, Principal Executive Officer |
|                               |                                         |
|                               |                                         |
| Dated:  December 7, 2015 | /s/ Shannon Masjedi                          |
|                               | Shannon Masjedi, Principal Financial Officer |
Frederick STRAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0524

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

Frederick Strain, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED .

Wolf, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
Tony KANE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 26, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

As it appears that the petitioner is represented by counsel in the proceeding in the trial court, the petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003).

CASANUEVA, WALLACE, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary E. Brickey, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 909]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J), rendered December 16, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Defendant was charged in a 10-count indictment with various crimes arising from incidents occurring between September 2001 and December 2001 during which he had sexual contact with his minor step-granddaughter. He subsequently entered an *Alford*plea to the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal, except with respect to the sentence, and was to be sentenced to a prison term of “up to seven years.” At sentencing, County Court imposed a seven-year prison term, to be followed by a three-year period of postrelease supervision, as well as a $5,000 fine and an order of protection.

On appeal, defendant contends that the sentence and fine are *604harsh and excessive. Initially, we note that County Court imposed the statutorily authorized maximum sentence, which defendant was informed that the prosecution would recommend as part of the plea bargain *(see*Penal Law § 70.02 [3] [c]). Given the heinous nature of the crime involving defendant’s abuse of a position of trust, as well as his extensive criminal history which includes prior sex crimes, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Agan,*301 AD2d 968, 968 [2003]; *People v Shook,*294 AD2d 710, 713-714 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 702 [2002]). Moreover, County Court had authority to impose the fine *(see*Penal Law § 80.00 [1] [a]) and, considering the nature of defendant’s conduct and that he was informed of this potential consequence during the plea proceedings, we find no reason to disturb it *(see People v Oliver,*276 AD2d 930, 931 [2000]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Raquel NARANJO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1379

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
### AMENDMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION PURSUANT TO 42 Pa.C.S. § 3502(c)

204 Pa. Code Ch. 207 (Transmitting Remittances)

§ 207.3. Online Payment Convenience Fee

-- Adjustment of Fines, Costs, Fees, and Other Remittances.

(a) Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 3502(c)(3), the Court Administrator of Pennsylvania hereby adjusts the level of fines, costs, fees, and other remittances by assessing a non

refundable [$2.75] 2.75 percent (%) convenience fee for online credit/debit card payments of court costs, fines, fees, and restitution associated with pre

- existing cases, cases initiated within the Magisterial District Judge, Common Pleas, and Appellate Court Case Management Systems of the Pennsylvania Courts, or filings submitted via the Guard ianship Tracking System. The 2.75 % convenience fee shall also be assessed on any other online credit/debit card payments initiated through the AOPC’s UJS Portal. Said amount shall be paid through a contracted financial intermediary and shall be added at the time of the payment.

(b) This regulation shall become effective [January 1, 2010] April 1, 2024 , and shall apply to all online credit/debit card payments initiated through the AOPC's UJS Portal [made on or after this date on pre

- existing cases, cases i nitiated within the Magisterial District Judge, Common Pleas, and Appellate Court Case Management Systems of the Pennsylvania Courts, or filings submitted via the Guardianship Tracking System]

.
Lee EAKINS v. Mark WILSON, Carolyn Dobbs, Karen Sullivan, David Maxey, and Jennifer Dollar

2160330

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. section1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fona, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Friess,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



BY(Signature)                         /s/ Michael Friess
(Name and Title)                      Michael Friess, Chairman of the Board,
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

(Date)                                December 10, 2010







                                       15