7118 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

9See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

10See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate from Austria, Belgium, France, the 

Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 

Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for 

France, the Federal Republic of Germany, the 

Republic of Korea and Taiwan, and Antidumping 

Duty Orders, 82 FR 24096, 24098 (May 25, 2017). 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

simple average of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for Industeel and NLMK 

Belgium. The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.9

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. As indicated above, for 

Dillinger and Industeel France, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate any existing 

entries of merchandise produced by 

Dillinger or Industeel France, but 

exported by other parties, at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original LTFV investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent segment for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 5.40 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.10 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is being issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of Issues 

Comment Pertaining to Dillinger 

Comment 1: Recission for AG der Dillinger 

Hu ̈ttenwerke 

Comments Pertaining to Industeel 

Comment 2: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available to Home Market Inland Freight 

Comment 3: Major Input Rule for Scrap 

Comment 4: Adjustment to General and 

Administrative Expense Ratio 

Comments Pertaining to NLMK Belgium 

Comment 5: Exclusion of U.S. Sales 

Matched to the Constructed Value 

Comment 6: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available to U.S. Inland Freight and 

Warehousing Expenses 

Comment 7: Constructed Export Price 

Offset 

Comment 8: Adjustment to U.S. Indirect 

Selling Expense Ratio 

Comment 9: Adjustment to General and 

Administrative Expense Ratio 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02636 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–829] 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From 

the Republic of Turkey: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of NoShipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

or exporters of steel concrete reinforcing 

bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey 

(Turkey) subject to this review made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR) July 1, 2019, through June 

30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak or Jose Rivera, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642 or (202) 482–0842, 

respectively. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 7119 

1See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 

Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No-Shipments; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 43181 (August 6, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results). 2On September 3, 2020, Commerce published a 

notice of initiation listing nine companies. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 54983 (September 3, 

2020) (Initiation Notice). Kaptan Demir is being 

collapsed with Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret Ve 

Nakliyat A.S (collectively, Kaptan) and Colakoglu 

Dis Ticaret A.S. is being collapsed with Colakoglu 

Metal (collectively, Colakoglu) such that they are 

treated as single entities. Habas Sinai ve Tibbi 

Gazlar Istihsal Endu ̈ strisi A.S. had no shipments 

during the POR, as discussed below in the ‘‘Final 

Determination of No Shipments’’ section. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from 

Turkey, 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 

Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for 

the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty 

Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017), as amended, 

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of 

Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

With the Amended Final Determination in the LessThan-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended 

Final Determination, 87 FR 934 (January 22, 2022) 

(Order). 

5See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6As noted above, for the purposes of these final 

results, we are collapsing Colakoglu Metalurji A. S. 

with Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S. and Kaptan Demir 

with Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret Ve Nakliyat A.S. and 

treating them as single entities; see Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

7This rate is based on the rates for the 

respondents that were selected for individual 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts available. See section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2021, we published the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review and invited 

interest parties to comment.1 These final 

results cover eight companies for which 

an administrative review was initiated 

and not rescinded.2 For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the Preliminary Results, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The product covered by the Order is 

steel concrete reinforcing bar from 

Turkey. For a full description of the 

scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of these 

issues discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached in an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is available electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, a review of the record, and for 

the reasons explained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, we made 

changes to Kaptan Demir’s margin 

calculations. We did not make changes 

to Colakoglu’s margin. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

For the Preliminary Results, we found 

that Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal 

Endu ̈ strisi A.S (Habas) did not have any 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. No parties commented 

on this preliminary determination. For 

the final results of the review, we 

continue to find that Habas made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. 

Final Results of the Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the period July 1, 2019, through 

June 30, 2020: 

Producers/exporters 6

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Colakoglu Metalurji A.S./Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S .................................................................................................................... 0.00 

Kaptan Demir Celik Endu ̈strisi ve Ticaret A.S./Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret Ve Nakliyat A.S ........................................................ 1.02 

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 7

Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S ...................................................................................................................... 1.02 

Kroman Celik Sanayi A.S ............................................................................................................................................................ 1.02 

Yu ̈cel Boru Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S ̧ .............................................................................................................................. 1.02 

Diler Dis Ticaret A.S .................................................................................................................................................................... 1.02 

Rates for Non-Selected Companies 

For the rate for non-selected 

respondents in an administrative 

review, generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted-average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ In this 

segment of the proceeding, we 

calculated a margin for Kaptan Demir 

that was not zero, de minimis, or based 

on facts available, whereas, for 

Colakoglu, we calculated a margin that 

was zero. Accordingly, Commerce is 

assigning Colakoglu’s rate of 1.02 

percent to companies not selected for 

individual examination. 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7120 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

8See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

9See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

10 Id. 11See Order, 87 FR 935. 

review.8 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), Commerce calculated an 

importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping assessment rate for Kaptan 

Demir that is not zero or de minimis, 

and will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce will also instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

1.02 percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were produced and/or exported by Icdas 

Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi 

A.S., Kroman Celik Sanayi A.S., Yu ̈ cel 

Boru Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S ̧., 

and Diler Dis Ticaret A.S. In addition, 

we continue to find that Habas had no 

shipments during the POR. Accordingly, 

consistent with Commerce’s practice, 

we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 

any existing entries of merchandise 

produced by Habas, but exported by 

other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate.9

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Kaptan Demir for which it 

did not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.10

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the ad valorem rate is 

de minimis, then the cash deposit rate 

will be zero); (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

covered in this review, the cash deposit 

rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company was 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.90 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.11 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as final reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Companies not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

V. Final Determination of no Shipments 

VI. Affiliation and Single Entities 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VIII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Accept Colakoglu’s Verification Exhibits 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Deny Colakoglu’s Duty Drawback 

Adjustment 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Grant the Turkish Respondents a Full 

Duty Drawback Adjustment 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Contract Date for Kaptan Demir’s 

U.S. Date of Sale 

Comment 5: Whether Section 232 Duties 

Should be Deducted from Export Price 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Reclassify Kaptan Demir’s Claimed 

Levels of Trade 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Value of Kaptan Demir’s 

Scrap and Defective Merchandise 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Kaptan Demir’s TOTCOM for Idle 

Asset Expenses 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Treat INTNFR2U as a Movement 

Expense or Commission Expense 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Permit an Offset for Kaptan Demir’s 

Short Term Deposit Income 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02638 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–484–803] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From 

Greece: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producer/exporter subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

April 19, 2019, through April 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Litwin, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES