alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nathanael Lenard REYNOLDS, Appellant v. Amanda SHULER, Asst. Public Def., et al., Appellees

No. 16-7037

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: May 2, 2017

Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Pro Se

BEFORE: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant on November 28, 2016. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 29, 2016 be affirmed. The district court appropriately denied appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed the complaint without prejudice on the ground that appellant had failed to provide a certified copy of his trust account statement, signed by an appropriate prison official, in accordance with that court’s October 20, 2015 order. Because the district court’s dismissal was without prejudice, appellant may bring his claims in a new complaint filed in district court, but appellant must submit the required financial information in order for the district court to consider his complaint and any application to proceed without prepayment of fees.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Arthur L. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-137

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 26, 2018]

Arthur L. Sanders, Jr., Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Leslie Allen ACHTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2722

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Giovanni Pelaez, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 894]

*350Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered November 7, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

After a thorough hearing, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea *(see People v Frederick,*45 NY2d 520 [1978]). Defendant’s claims of innocence and coercion were incredible and contradicted by the record. We also note that defendant moved to withdraw his plea only after defendant had been returned on a bench warrant approximately SVs years after he had absconded while awaiting sentence.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The record supports the hearing court’s finding that the lineup was not unduly suggestive, since there was no substantial likelihood that defendant would be singled out for identification *(see People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]). A review of the lineup photograph establishes that the height difference between defendant and the other participants was rendered barely noticeable by the fact that all participants were seated. The clothing defendant wore in the lineup was not distinctive and was significantly different from the clothing worn by the perpetrator as described by the witness.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1



MUZAK HOLDINGS LLC

Section 302
Certification



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer



I, Stephen P. Villa, Chief Financial Officer of Muzak Holdings LLC
certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Muzak
Holdings LLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 15, 2005



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ Stephen P. Villa          
|Name: Stephen P. Villa        
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6188 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 570
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6188

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           November 20, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the 
              ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NANCY YOUNT CHILDS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nancy 
Yount Childs Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 570

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6188

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the 
              ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 20, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Isaac Smith *versus*Jonathan Sinclair

Where one had given his promissory note, in consideration of a bond conditioned for the conveyance of land by the obligor, the promisor was holden to pay his note, although the land was under a mortgage at the time of executing the bond, and so continued when payment of the note was demanded.

Assumpsit on a promissory note made by the defendant, payable to the plaintiff. It was agreed, in a case stated for the opinion of the Court, that the consideration of the note was a bond, given by the plaintiff to the defendant, conditioned for the conveyance to the defendant of a certain tract of land; and that the land had been mortgaged in fee to one *Lumbard*prior to the making of the said bond and note, and that a part of the money due by the mortgage remained unpaid at the commencement of this action.

*Boutelle,*for the defendant,

argued that the contract, being in its nature executory, might be rescinded by the * defendant, on the ground of fraud in the plaintiff. He had undertaken to give the defendant a good title to land not his own. If the defendant were to pay the money claimed in this action, and the plaintiff were to tender him a deed, with all the necessary covenants, the defendant might refuse the deed, and have his action to recover back th money. But circuity of action is to be avoided. (1)

*Rice,*for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff was seised of the land, and was able to pass the title in fee. The note was, then, made for a valuable and sufficient consideration. Here is no ground for a *160charge of fraud. It is every day’s practice to convey land already mortgaged by the grantor, either by a second mortgage, or unconditionally ; and this with the knowledge of the grantee, who may either rely on the grantor to dissolve the encumbrance, or may retain a sufficiency of the purchase money in his own hands for the purpose. And of this opinion was the Court, (a)

(1)

11 *Johns.*525, *Judson*vs. *Wass.*— 9 *Mass. Rep.*78, *Johnson*vs. *Reed &*Al— *Peake's L. of Evid.*75.—5 *Mass. Rep.*494, *Aiken*vs. Sanford.

(a)

**Vide *Greenleaf*vs. Cooke, *2 Wheat. 13.—Knapp*vs. Lee, 3 *Pick. 452 —Howard*vs. Witham, *2 Greerl. 390.—Frisbee*vs. Hoffnagle, 11 *Johns.*50.— *Winter vs.*Livings. ton, 13 Johns. 54.

*Defendant defaulted.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 1 21 DB 2023 (No. 72 RST 2023)

:

REBECCA CHR I STINE SHAEFFER : Attorney Registration No. 315712

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : ( Out of State )

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2 nd d ay of November , 2023, the Report and Recommendation of

Disciplinary Board Member dated O ctober 25 , 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

REBECCA CHRISTINE SHAEFFER , who has been on Administrative Suspension, has

demonstrated that s he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses

incurr ed by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by

the Petitioner.
Everette Leon STOUT v. STATE

CR-16-0052

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Maheishewa WILLIAMS v. MERCEDES BENZ OF HUNTSVILLE, Knox Williams, Rob Callis, and Noland M. Ryan

2150995

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Joshua WELDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2561

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Calixto ALFONSO, D.C., P.A., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1888

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 09, 2017

Petitioner's request for oral argument is hereby denied.

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed. *See**Custer Medical Center v. United Automobile Insurance Co.*, 62 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2010).

Upon consideration of respondent's motion for attorney's fees, it is ordered that said motion is granted and remanded to the trial court to fix amount.

Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees is hereby denied.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SALTER, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB 

OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 

FOR THE QUARTERENDED MARCH 27, 2004 

 

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer ofPinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the “Issuer”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Issuer for the quarterly periodended March 27, 2004. 

 

I, John D. Bair, certify that the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB for the period ended March 27, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

 

This certification is executed as of May 13, 2004.
Carlos Jerome HENDRIX v. STATE

CR-15-1067

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied February 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT JUNE 30,  1998  AND THE  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 FOUND ON PAGES
3-5 OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                              
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAR-31-1999  
<PERIOD-START>                                         APR-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998  
<CASH>                                                     920,259  
<SECURITIES>                                               711,314  
<RECEIVABLES>                                            3,040,615   
<ALLOWANCES>                                              (100,280)  
<INVENTORY>                                                      0   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         5,896,203   
<PP&E>                                                   1,294,601   
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (770,918)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           8,391,972   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,543,625   
<BONDS>                                                          0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0   
<PREFERRED>                                                      0   
<COMMON>                                                   884,289  
<OTHER-SE>                                              18,900,290  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             8,391,972  
<SALES>                                                    914,671  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         3,379,377  
<CGS>                                                      781,396  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            2,222,896  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         1,281,345  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          63,877  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (123,297)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (20,000)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (103,297)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0  
<CHANGES>                                                        0  
<NET-INCOME>                                             (103,297)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (.01)  
                                                      



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The BISYS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the six months ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          47,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,132
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,492
<PP&E>                                          52,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,633
<BONDS>                                          1,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           501
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,192
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   907
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2
**Officer Certification**
I, Christopher W. Wolf, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Catalina MarketingCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: September 14, 2004
By: /s/ Christopher W. Wolf
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN-7969

NO. 2018-BA-0885

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

BAR ADMISSIONS PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

*1040After reviewing the evidence and considering the law, we conclude petitioner is eligible to be admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana.

**ADMISSION GRANTED.**
Michael J. STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-538

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.