alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Noble HAMMONS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-11396 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 5, 2017

Amber Michelle Grand, Attorney, James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

*218Brandon Elliott Beck, Sherylynn Ann Kime-Goodwin, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock,, TX, Aisha J. Dennis, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Noble Hammons appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court erred in ordering two consecutive terms of imprisonment because the court’s original sentence had been for one term of supervised release. Given Hammons’s objection at the revocation hearing, we review under the “plainly unreasonable” standard. *See United States v. Warren,*720 F.3d 321, 326 (5th Cir. 2013). If this court determines that the sentence imposed was unreasonable, it may reverse the district court only if “the-error was obvious under existing law.” *Id.*(quoting *United States v. Miller,*634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir. 2011)).

Hammons has not met this standard. Given the ambiguities in the oral pronouncement and written judgment as to whether the original sentence was for one term of supervised release or two concurrent terms of supervised release, we assess the intent of the sentencing court as “discerned from the entire record.” *United States v. McAfee,*832 F.2d 944, 946 (5th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Contrary to Ham-mons’s arguments, the district court here did not improperly alter its original sentence but rather clarified it. Because of the district court’s explanation of its intent, and the absence of authority to support Hammons’s argument, he has not shown that the district court committed an obvious error under existing law. *Warren,*720 F.3d at 326.

AFFIRMED

*

 Pursuant to 5th 'Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 426 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6160 

[Report No. 118–513] 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a lifespan respite 

care program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. MOLINARO (for himself and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MAY 21, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Ms. CARAVEO, Mr. JACKSON of North Carolina, Mr. 

PAPPAS, and Mr. LAWLER

MAY 21, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on November 1, 2023] 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6160 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize a 

lifespan respite care program. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6160 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE 

4 CARE PROGRAM. 

5 Section 2905 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 300ii–4) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2020 

7 through fiscal year 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 

8 through 2029’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 426 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6160 

[Report No. 118–513] 

A BILL 

reauthorize a lifespan respite care program. 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to 

MAY 21, 2024 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Draft Agenda 9/22 & 23/ 2014

U.S. Department of Energy

Manufactured Housing Working Group

September 22

- 23 , 2014

Agenda

**Day 1: September 22 , 2014**  ******

9:00

– 9:15 Introductions (including remote), housekeeping

9:15

– 9:30 Opening remarks by the WG members

9:30

– 10:0 0 Introduction of Cost Data (Emanuel Levy)

10:00

– 12:00 DOE (Navigant): LCC w ith Updated Cost D ata and Annual Energy

Runs Presentation

12:00

– 1:0 0 **LUNCH BREAK**

1:0 0

– 2:00 Continuation of Cost Data Discussion (if necessary)

2:00

– 4 :00 Subcommittee Reports

Affordability Report (Rob Roy)

Financial (Stacey Epperson)

Manufacturing (David Tompos)

2015 IECC Scope (Manny Santana)

4:00

– 5:00 Public Comment, other DOE administrative items, next steps,

conclude

**Day 2: September 10 , 2014**  ******

9:00

– 9:30 WG Comment

9:30

– 12:00 Continue Subcommittee Reports

12:00

– 1:00 **LUNCH BREAK**

1 :00

– 3:3 0 Action Items:

Climate Zones

Multiple Product Types

Compliance Paths

3:3 0

– 4:00 Review Road Map for additional action items and adjustments

4:00

– 5:00 Public Comment, Recap/Review, Next Steps, Homework, Review

Schedule and Wrap

- up Comments

** Breaks at the request of the groupDraft Agenda 9/22 & 23/ 2014

**DATE Location**  **Room Webinar Link** 

September 22, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/915091240

September 23, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/278235472

October 1, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/585091001

October 2, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH

- 019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/726540504

October 23, 2014 Denver (Golden)

October 24, 2014 Denver (Golden)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66830-66831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27158]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9524-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities OMB Responses

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) responses to Agency Clearance requests, in compliance with the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). An agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed 
in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Rick Westlund (202) 566-1682, or 
email at westlund.rick@epa.gov and please refer to the appropriate EPA 
Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Responses To Agency Clearance Requests

OMB Approvals

    EPA ICR Number 1587.12; State Operating Permit Regulations; 40 CFR 
part 70; was approved on 10/03/2012; OMB Number 2060-0243; expires on 
10/31/2015; Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 0270.45; Public Water System Supervision Program 
(Renewal); 40 CFR parts 141 and 142; was approved on 10/03/2012; OMB 
Number 2040-0090; expires on 10/31/2015; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 2164.04; Emission Guidelines for Existing Other 
Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) Units; 40 CFR part 60 subparts A and 
FFFF; was approved on 10/03/2012; OMB Number 2060-0562; expires on 10/
31/2015; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 2196.04; NSPS for Stationary Compression Ignition 
Internal Combustion Engines; 40 CFR part 60 subparts A and IIII; was 
approved on 10/03/2012; OMB Number 2060-0590; expires on 10/31/2015; 
Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 2461.01; Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA) 
Rebate Program (New Collection); was approved on 10/25/2012; OMB Number 
2060-0686; expires on 10/31/2015; Approved with change.
    EPA ICR Number 1617.07; Servicing of Motor Vehicle Air Conditioners 
(Renewal); 40 CFR part 82 subpart B; was approved on 10/26/2012; OMB 
Number 2060-0247; expires on 10/31/2015; Approved without change.
    EPA ICR Number 2104.04; Brownfields Program--Accomplishment 
Reporting (Renewal); 40 CFR parts 30 and 31; was approved on 10/02/
2012; OMB Number 2050-0192; expires on 10/31/2015; Approved without 
change.
    EPA ICR Number 2003.05; NESHAP for Integrated Iron and Steel

[[Page 66831]]

Manufacturing (Renewal); 40 CFR part 63 subparts A and FFFFF; was 
approved on 10/02/2012; OMB Number 2060-0517; expires on 10/31/2015; 
Approved without change.

John Moses,
Director, Collections Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-27158 Filed 11-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### Jeremiah Glidden *versus*Stevens Smith.

Under the statute of 1805, c. 100, two beds only were held to be exempted from attachment and execution, where the debtor’s family consisted of himself and wife, and three young sons.

The defendant., a deputy sheriff, having an execution, in favor of one *Daniel D. Rogers,*against the plaintiff, seized certain articles of household furniture, amongst which was one bed, leaving two beds only for the use of the plaintiff’s family, which consisted of himself, his wife, and three young sons. The plaintiff brought this action of trespass because, by the statute of 1805, c. 100, beds necessary for a debtor and his family are wholly exempted from *158attachment and execution ; and it was contended that the proviso in the first section, by limiting the number of beds to one for every two persons, had exempted three, where there were five in a family. And *the Court*seemed inclined to that construction in case the sex of the different members of the family rendered the use of the same bed by three of them inconsistent with the common decencies of life. But, in the present case, the three boys might well occupy one Led, and would be sufficiently accommodated therewith.

*Belcher*for the plaintiff.

*Perley*for the defendant.

*Plaintiff nonsuit.*
IN RE: COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS CFN468020

NO. 2017-BA-0876

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Rehearing denied.

CLARK, J., would grant rehearing for briefing and oral argument.

CRICHTON, J., would grant rehearing for briefing and oral argument.
Ray JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2568

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Otis TIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-465

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 17, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### Bernard Ray RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor DULANES; N. Stanford, Head Nurse W.R.S.P.; Leslie J. Fleming, Warden W.R.S.P.; B. R. Ravizee, Grievance Coordinator W.R.S.P.; R. H. Bivens, Grievance Coordinator Western Regional Administrator Office; C. L. Parr, Grievance Coordinator Western Regional Administrator Office; Nurse Bledsoe, W.R.S.P.; H. C. Ray, Virginia Department of Corrections Director of Health Services; Name Unknown, Va D.O.C. Director of Health Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-6906

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 2017

Decided: June 1, 2017

Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Ray Richardson appeals from the district court’s orders denying his request to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court found that Richardson did not make a sufficient showing that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury and dismissed his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record, including the dismissal orders identified as qualifying strikes pursuant to § 1915(g), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Richardson v. Dulanes,*No. 1:16-cv-00356-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2016 & June 1, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*104terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6244

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, as the ``1st 
           Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 6, 2023

Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, as the ``1st 
           Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1ST LIEUTENANT ANDRES ZERMENO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1535 East Los Ebanos Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, shall 
be known and designated as the ``1st Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``1st 
Lieutenant Andres Zermeno Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

2016-2056

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: February 15, 2017

Krista Marie Carter, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Deborah E. Fishman.

Rick B. Yeager, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellant.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Moore and Chen, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam.

On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                         1998         1997        
                                                                       ----------   ----------    
<S>                                                                    <C>          <C>           
Income applicable to common shares:                                                               
                                                                                                  
Net loss                                                                    $(5)     $(3,172)     
                                                                                                  
Increase in earnings resulting from conversion of convertible debt            -            -     
                                                                       ----------   ----------    
                                                                                                  
              Loss applicable to common shares                              $(5)     $(3,172)     
                                                                       ==========   ==========    
                                                                                                  
                                                                                                  
     Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                  7,282        7,239     
                                                                                                  
                                                                                                  
              Weighted average common shares                               7,282        7,239     
                                                                       ==========   ==========    
                                                                                                  
                                                                                                  
     Loss per common share                                               $(0.01)      $(0.44)     
                                                                       ==========   ==========    
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

VERN ODELL CRAWFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-70108, CA-99-61-7)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vern Odell Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Vern Odell Crawford seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Crawford, Nos. CR-95-

70108; CA-99-61-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
T. O. C.,

Appellant,

v.

BETHANY CHRISTIAN 

SERVICES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3419

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 12, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

Robert C. Allen of Robert C. Allen, P.A., Pensacola; Candice K. Brower of the 

Office of the Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, 

Tallahassee; and Anna L. Uniacke of the Office of Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal 

Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Gayle J. Ryba of Gayle J. Ryba, P.A., for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Larry C. Barenbaum, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Christopher & Banks Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and

 

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: January 6, 2011 |   |                                            |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |                                            |
|                  | By:    | /s/ Larry C. Barenbaum                          |
|                  |   | Larry C. Barenbaum                              |
|                  |   | *Interim President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS  OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 FOUND ON
PAGES 3-5 OF THE  COMPANY'S  FORM  10QSB AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,692,759
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,085,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                        54,811
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,979,183
<PP&E>                                           1,177,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                     650,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,625,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,233,125
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           884,289
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,900,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,625,249
<SALES>                                          3,556,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,785,272
<CGS>                                            1,943,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,274,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 148,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,636,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,766,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,766,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.29)
                                                          
                                               

</TABLE>