There is extensive evidence that ambient air pollution affects human health (e.g., Brunekreef and Holgate 2002; Künzli et al. 2000; Pope et al. 2002). Most studies have focused on the effects of air pollution on adult mortality and respiratory morbidity (Dockery et al. 1993; Schwartz and Marcus 1990). However, some age groups appear to be more susceptible than others. For example, it has been shown that the effects are larger in the elderly than in the general adult population (Saldiva et al. 1995). Studies on childhood health risks, such as respiratory symptoms or hospital admissions for asthma, suggest that the opposite end of the age spectrum is also more vulnerable to air pollution than is the general population (Dockery and Pope 1994; Heinrich et al. 1999; Schwartz et al. 1994). In addition to these “traditional” end points in children, there is now emerging evidencethat air pollution is also associated with elevated risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (Glinianaia et al. 2004; Maisonet et al. 2004).The study of birth outcomes is an important emerging field of environmental epidemiology. Birth outcomes are important in their own right because they are important indicators of the health of the newborns and infants. In addition, low birth weight (LBW), intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), and impaired growth in the first years of life are known to influence the subsequent health status of individuals, including increased mortality and morbidity in childhood and an elevated risk of hypertension, coronary heart disease, and non-insulin-dependent diabetes in adulthood (Barker 1995; Osmond and Baker 2000). It is increasingly apparent that there is acritical period of development when the timing of exposure and the dose absorption rate can be even more important for the biologic effects than is the overall dose (Axelrod et al. 2001). Fetuses, in particular, are considered to be highly susceptible to a variety of toxicantsbecause of their exposure pattern and physiologic immaturity (Perera et al. 1999; S ˇ rám 1999). Their developing organ systems can be more vulnerable to environmental toxicants during critical windows (sensitive periods of development) because of higher rates of cellproliferation or changing metabolic capabilities (Calabrese 1986). Therefore, prenatal exposure to environmental pollution can result in some adverse reproductive outcomes, similar to the association between maternal active and passive smoking and impaired reproductive outcomes (Misra and Nguyen1999; Salihu et al. 2004). The specific mechanisms that may account for the link betweenambient air pollution and adverse reproductive outcomes are also reviewed in this article. The objective of this review is to examine the evidence linking adverse birth outcomes with ambient air pollution. For the purpose of this review, birth outcomes have been divided into five groups: a ) mortality of fetuses and infants, b) LBW, c ) premature (preterm) births, d ) IUGR, and e ) birth defects. In this article we review the evidence on each of these separately. For each of the outcomes, we assess the three critical issues in interpretingepidemiologic studies (random error, selection or measurement bias, and confounding); issues related to all reviewed outcomes (e.g., publication bias or biologic plausibility) are considered together at the end of the article. By weighting the evidence, we attempt to draw balanced conclusions about the relations between air pollution and birth outcomes.



### Materials and Methods
We searched all publications included in the electronic databases PubMed (from 1966; National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) and the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index of the Institute of Scientific Information, available on the Web of Knowledge (from 1981; Thompson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, USA). We searched for combinations of either of the key words “air pollution” or “pollution” with any of the following: “infantmortality,” “postneonatal mortality,” “postneonatal mortality,” “birth weight,” “birthweight,” “intrauterine growth retardation,” “IUGR,” “premature birth,” “prematurity,” “fetal growth,” and “foetal growth.” We also searched the reference lists of identified papers for additional publications. We excluded abstracts of conference presentationsbecause they did not contain sufficient information (but relevant conference abstracts that were subsequently published as full papers were included).

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 

### 375 Address correspondence to R.J. S ˇ rám, Laboratory of Genetic Ecotoxicology, Institute of Experimental Medicine AS CR, 142 20 Prague 4, Vídeòská 1083, Czech Republic. Telephone: 420-241-062-596. Fax: 420-241-062-785. E-mail: sram@biomed.cas.cz

We thank T. Damstra (World Health Organization, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) for her critical

comments.

This work was supported by the grants from the European Commission (QLRT-2001-02198, ChildrenGenonetwork) and the Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic (VaV 740/5/03).

The authors declare they have no competing
financial interests.

Received 31 March 2003; accepted 4 January 2005. 

## Ambient Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review of the Literature

Radim J. S ˇrám, 1 Blanka Binková, 1 Jan Dejmek, 1 and Martin Bobak 2

**1 Laboratory of Genetic Ecotoxicology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences, and Health Institute of Central**  **Bohemia, Prague, Czech Republic; 2**  **Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom** 

Over the last decade or so, a large number of studies have investigated the possible adverse effects of ambient air pollution on birth outcomes. We reviewed these studies, which were identified by a systematic search of the main scientific databases. Virtually all reviewed studies were population based, with information on exposure to air pollution derived from routine monitoring sources. Overall, there is evidence implicating air pollution in adverse effects on different birth outcomes, but the strength of the evidence differs between outcomes. The evidence is sufficient to infer a causal relationship between particulate air pollution and respiratory deaths in the postneonatal period. For air pollution and birth weight the evidence suggests causality, but further studies are needed to confirm an effect and its size and to clarify the most vulnerable period of pregnancy and the role of different pollutants. For preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) the evidence as yet is insufficient to infer causality, but the available evidence justifies further studies. Molecular epidemiologic studies suggest possible biologic mechanisms for the effect on birth weight, premature birth, and IUGR and support the view that the relation between pollution and these birth outcomes is genuine. For birth defects, the evidence base so far is insufficient to draw conclusions. In terms of exposure to specific pollutants, particulates seem the most important for infant deaths, and the effect on IUGR seems linked to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, but the existing evidence does not allow precise identification of the different pollutants or the timing of exposure that can result in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Key words: air pollution, intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, molecular epidemiology, PAHs, particulate matter, PM 10 , premature birth, reproductive effects, SO 2 . Environ Health Perspect 113:375–382 (2005). doi:10.1289/ehp.6362 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 4 January 2005] 

# Research **Review**

### Results Air pollution and childhood mortality. The possible impact of air pollution on children’shealth was first connected to early child mortality. One of the earliest reports was based on an ecologic study of counties of England andWales in 1958–1964, with air pollution estimated from indices of domestic and industrial pollution (Collins et al. 1971). The studyfound significant correlations between air pollution and infant mortality, and infant respiratory mortality in particular. The Nashville Air Pollution Study, conducted in the 1950s,indicated that dust fall, a measure of air pollution estimated for each census tract, wasrelated to neonatal deaths with signs of prematurity, but the results were inconclusive (Sprague and Hagstrom 1969). Another early signal that air pollution may be associatedwith deaths in infancy came from the extensive analyses of air pollution and mortality in 117 U.S. metropolitan areas in the 1960s (Lave and Seskin 1977). Particulates and, to alesser degree, sulfate concentrations were positively associated with infant mortality; a 10% increase in pollution was associated with a 1% increase in infant mortality. Almost two decades passed before a new generation of studies addressed this question in more detail. These newer studies, summarized in Table 1, confirmed the early results. A small ecologic study in the Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,metropolitan area reported a positive association between annual levels of particulates and infant mortality from pneumonia (Penna and Duchiade 1991). Bobak and Leon (1992) studied infant mortality in an ecologic study in the Czech Republic. The study found an association between sulfur dioxide and total suspended particles (TSP), and infant mortality, aftercontrolling for a number of potential confounding variables (at the ecologic level). The effects were specific to respiratory mortality in the postneonatal period. These results were later confirmed in a nationwide case–control study based on the Czech national death and birth registers; this design allowed controllingfor social and biologic covariates at the individual level (Bobak and Leon 1999a). The study found a strong effect of SO 2 and TSP on postneonatal mortality from respiratory causes: the relative risks (RRs) per 50 μg/m3 increase in pollutant concentration were 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–3.50] for

SO 2 and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.01–2.98) for TSP.Woodruff et al. (1997) analyzed the association between early postneonatal mortality and

PM 10 (particulate matter < 10 μm) levels in about 4 million babies born from 1989 through 1991 in the United States. Infants were categorized as having high, medium, or low exposures based on tertiles of PM 10 . After adjustment forother covariates, for total postneonatal mortality for the high-exposure (> 40 μg/m3) versus low-exposure (< 28 μg/m 3 ) groups was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04–1.16). In infants of normal birth weight, high PM 10 exposure was associated with respiratory deaths (RR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.05–1.85) and sudden infant death syndrome (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14–1.39). The results were similar in term and LBW infants.Pereira et al. (1998) investigated the associations between daily counts of intrauterine mortality in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, in1991–1992 and daily measurements of several pollutants: nitrogen dioxide, SO 2 , carbon monoxide, ozone, and PM 10 . The association was strongest for NO 2 (coefficient R

= 0.0013/μg/m3 ; p < 0.01). A significant association was also observed with exposure combining the pollutants NO 2 , SO 2 , and CO together ( p < 0.01).Loomis et al. (1999) conducted a timeseries study of infant mortality in the southwestern part of Mexico City in 1993–1995. Exposure included NO 2 , SO 2 , O 3 , and particulate matter < 2.5 μm (PM2.5). A 10 μg/m3 increase in the mean level of fine particles during the preceding 3 days was associated with a 6.9% (95% CI, 2.5–11.3%) excess increase in infant death. Dolk et al. (2000) examined perinatal and infant outcomes in populations residing near22 coke works in Great Britain. Data on specific pollutants were not provided; the exposure was based on the proximity to pollution sources. The ratios of observed to expected cases for residence in proximity of the cokeworks were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78–1.12) for stillbirth, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.83–1.09) for infant mortality, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72–1.03) for neonatal mortality, 1.10 (95% CI, 0.90–1.33) for postneonatal mortality, 0.79 (95% CI,0.30–1.46) for respiratory postneonatal mortality, and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77–1.43) for sudden infant death syndrome in the postneonatalperiod. This study, however, had a limited statistical power owing to the relatively small size of the study. A time-series analysis of daily deaths in Seoul, South Korea, found a relatively specific association between PM 10 and total and respiratory mortality in the postneonatal period; the RRs per 10 μg/m3 were 1.03 (1.02–1.04) and 1.18 (1.14–1.21), respectively (Ha et al. 2003).The consistency of these studies, conducted in a range of different populations and using both spatial and time-series studydesigns, is remarkable. The three largest studies produced very similar estimates of RR (Bobak and Leon 1992, 1999a; Woodruff et al. 1997). Perhaps the only alternative explanation that may affect the interpretation Review 

## | S ˇ rám et al.



### 376 VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 • Environmental Health Perspectives Table 1. Air pollution and child mortality.

Mortality Pollutant Results Reference

Postneonatal respiratory TSP AOR = 2.41 (95% CI, 1.10–5.28) Bobak and Leon 1992 mortality comparing highest vs. lowest quintile AOR = 3.91 (95% CI, 0.90–3.50)

for 50 μg/m 3 increase Postneonatal respiratory TSP AOR = 1.95 (95% CI, 1.90–3.50) Bobak and Leon 1999a mortality for 50 μg/m 3 increase SO 2 AOR = 1.74 (95% CI, 1.01–2.98) for 50 μg/m 3 increase NO
x AOR = 1.66 (95% CI, 0.98–2.81) for 50 μg/m 3 increase
Postneonatal infant PM 10 AOR = 1.10 (95% CI, 1.04–1.16) Woodruff et al. 1997 mortality comparing high vs. low exposure Respiratory death groups PM 10 AOR = 1.40 (95% CI, 1.05–1.85) comparing high vs. low exposure with normal birth weight Sudden infant death PM 10 AOR = 1.26 (95% CI, 1.14–1.39) comparing high vs. low exposure

groups Intrauterine mortality NO 2 Strong association Pereira et al. 1998 (coefficient = 0.0013 μg/m 3

, p < 0.01) SO 2 NE CO NE Significant association using

pollution index NO
x + SO 2 + CO O 3 NE
PM 10 NE Infant mortality NO 2 NE Loomis et al. 1999 SO 2 NE CO NE O 3 NE
PM 10 6.9% excess (95% CI, 2.5–11.3%) for 10 μg/m 3 increase Perinatal and infant mortality NE between residence near coke Dolk et al. 2000
works

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; NE, no effect; PM 10, particulate matter < 10 μm; TSP, total suspended particulate.of these studies is confounding by maternal smoking. It is likely that maternal smoking is associated with children’s risk of respiratory death, and none of the studies was able tocontrol for maternal smoking on the individual level. However, at least three observations argue against this possibility. First, all recent studies controlled for socioeconomic factors and other potential confounders. Because smoking in industrialized countries is stronglysocially patterned, adjustment for socioeconomic factors should at least partly adjust for smoking. This would be reflected by adjusted estimates being substantially smaller than unadjusted ones. However, in most instances the differences between the crude and adjusted effect estimates were minimal. This does not suggest a presence of residual confounding.Second, the results of spatial and timeseries studies were similar. It is highly unlikelythat the social composition or maternal smoking in the studied populations would change substantially over the relatively short periods covered by the time-series studies. In ourview, the time-series design practically precludes a presence of confounding by socioeconomic factors or maternal smoking. Finally, the studies were conducted in very different populations, ranging from China to the United States and from Brazil tothe Czech Republic; it is unlikely that the distribution of socioeconomic disadvantage ormaternal smoking with respect to air pollution would be similar enough in these different countries to produce the same pattern ofresults. We therefore conclude that the evidence is sufficient to infer causal relationshipbetween particulate air pollution and respiratory deaths in the postneonatal period. Air pollution and birth weight. The potential effects of air pollutants on birth weight were first examined in a small case–control study by Alderman et al. (1987); the study didnot find any relationship between neighborhood ambient levels of CO during the third trimester of pregnancy and LBW. Over the last decade, this question has been investigated in a number of studies (summarized in Table 2). Wang et al. (1997) examined the effects of SO 2 and TSP on birth weight in a timeseries study in four relatively highly pollutedresidential areas of Beijing, China. A spectrum of potential confounding factors was adjusted for in multivariate analysis. A graded dose–effect relationship was found between maternal exposure to SO 2 and TSP during the third trimester and infant birth weight. The mean birth weight was reduced by 7.3 and 6.9 g for each 100-μg/m3 increase in SO 2and TSP, respectively. The RRs of LBW associated with a 100-μg/m3 increase in SO 2 and TSP were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06–1.16) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05–1.14), respectively. The authors speculated that SO 2 and particles, or some complex mixtures associated with these pollutants, during late gestation contributed to the LBW risk in the studied population. Bobak and Leon (1999b) conducted an ecologic study of LBW and levels of nitrous oxides (NO

x), SO 2, and TSP in 45 districts ofthe Czech Republic in 1986–1988. After controlling for socioeconomic factors, the RRs of LBW associated with an increase of 50 μg/m3
in the annual mean concentrations were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.96–1.12) for TSP, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02–1.17) for SO 2 , and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.98–1.16) for NO

x. When all pollutants were included in one model, only SO 2 remained related to LBW [odds ratio (OR), 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.20].In a subsequent study, Bobak (2000) analyzed individual-level data on all single live births in the Czech Republic that occurred in 1991 in the 67 districts where at least one pollutant (NO

x, SO 2, or TSP) was monitored. The risk of LBW was analyzed separately for each trimester of pregnancy. The association between LBW and pollution was strongest for pollutant levels during the first trimester of pregnancy. The RRs of LBW per 50 μg/m 3
increase in the mean concentration of SO 2 and TSP during the first trimester were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11–1.30) and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.07–1.24), respectively. In a population-based study in Southern California, Ritz and Yu (1999) examined the influence of pollution levels during the third trimester on LBW risk in a cohort of 126,000 term births. The exposure to O 3 , NO 2 , and

PM 10 in the last trimester was estimated from continuous monitoring data. After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk of LBW was associated with maternal exposure to > 5.5 ppm CO during the third trimester (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03–1.44). The association Review 

## | Air pollution and pregnancy outcome

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 

### 377 Table 2. Air pollution and birth weight.

Outcome Pollutant Results Reference

LBW SO 2 AOR = 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06–1.16) Wang et al. 1997 for 100 μg/m 3 increase TSP AOR = 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05–1.14) for 100 μg/m 3 increase LBW TSP OR = 1.04 (95% CI, 0.96–1.12) Bobak and Leon 1999b for 50 μg/m 3 increase SO 2 OR = 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02–1.17) for 50 μg/m 3 increase NO
x OR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.98–1.16) for 50 μg/m 3 increase LBW NO
x NE Bobak 2000 SO 2 AOR = 1.20 (95% CI, 1.11–1.30) for 50 μg/m 3 increase in the first trimester TSP AOR = 1.15 (95% CI, 1.07–1.24) for 50 μg/m 3 increase in the first trimester LBW O 3 NE Ritz and Yu 1999 NO 2 NE
PM 10 NE CO OR = 1.22 (95% CI, 1.03–1.44) for CO > 5.5 ppm in the first trimester VLBW TSP + SO 2 AOR = 2.88 (95% CI, 1.16–7.13) Rogers et al. 2000 comparing highest vs. lowest exposure groups (56.7 vs .9.9 μg/m 3 ) LBW CO AOR = 1.43 (95% CI, 1.18–1.74) Maisonet et al. 2001 for 1 ppm increase in first trimester AOR = 1.75 (95% CI, 1.50–2.04)

for 1 ppm increase in first trimester
in African Americans SO 2 AOR = 1.18/1.20 (95% CI, 1.02–1.36) ppm increase in all trimesters in whites LBW SO 2 + NO 2 + PM 10 AOR = 1.77 (95% CI, 1.00–3.12) Lin et al. 2001b comparing petrochemical and control municipalities LBW CO AOR = 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04–1.12) Ha et al. 2001
in the first trimester NO 2 AOR = 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03–1.11)
in the first trimester SO 2 AOR = 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02–1.10)
in the first trimester TSP AOR = 1.04 (95% CI, 1.00–1.08)
in the first trimester LBW POM OR = 1.31 (95% CI, 1.21–1.43) Vassilev et al. 2001b comparing highest vs. lowest

exposure groups

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; NE, no effect; VLBW, very low birth weight (< 1,500 g).between LBW risk and pollution exposure during earlier gestational stages was not significant. In a population-based case–control studyin Georgia (USA), Rogers et al. (2000) analyzed the combined effect on very low birth weight (VLBW) (< 1,500 g) of SO 2 and TSP levels, using annual exposure estimates. The risk of VLBW was increased in babies of mothers who were exposed to concentrations of the combined pollutants above the 95th percentile of the exposure distribution (56.8 μg/m 3 ); the RR was 2.88 (95% CI, 1.16–7.13). Maisonet et al. (2001) examined the association between term LBW and ambient levels of SO 2, PM 10, and CO in six large cities in the northeastern United States. Their results suggested that the effects of ambient CO and

SO 2 on the risk of term LBW may differ by ethnic group. In Caucasians ( n ~ 36,000), the risk of LBW associated with a 10-ppm increase

in SO 2 was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.12–1.23) in the first trimester, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02–1.35) in the second, and 1.20 (95% CI, 1.06–1.36) in the third. By contrast, in African Americans ( n ~ 47,000) LBW was associated with CO; a 1-ppm increase in CO concentration was associated with an RR of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.18–1.74) in the first trimester and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.50–2.04) in the third trimester. No effects were seen in Hispanics ( n ~ 13,000),although this may have been due to a lower statistical power in this group. Lin et al. (2001b) compared the rates ofadverse pregnancy outcomes in an area polluted by the petrochemical industry and in acontrol area in Taiwan. The exposed and control areas differed substantially in the levels of air pollution; for example, the differences in
the mean concentrations of PM 10 was 26.7 μg/m3 . The RR of term LBW, when the petrochemical municipality was compared with the control municipality, was 1.77 (95% CI, 1.00–3.12). Ha et al. (2001) examined full-term births from 1996 through 1997 in Seoul, South Korea, to determine the association between LBW and exposure to CO, SO 2 , NO 2 , TSP, and O 3 in the first and third trimesters. They found that ambient CO, SO 2, NO 2, and TSP concentrations during the first trimester of pregnancy were associated with LBW; the RRs were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04–1.12) for CO, 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02–1.10) for SO 2, 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03–1.11) for NO 2 , and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.00–1.08) for TSP. Vassilev et al. (2001b) used U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Cumulative Exposure Project data to investigate the association between outdoor airborne polycyclic organic matter (POM) and adversereproductive outcomes in New Jersey for newborns born in 1991–1992. The RR of LBW in term babies, comparing the highest and the lowest exposure groups, was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.21–1.43). Bobak et al. (2001) tested the hypothesis that air pollution is related to LBW on data from a British 1946 cohort. They found a strong association between birth weight and air pollution index based on coal consumption. After controlling for a number of potential confounding variables, babies born in the most polluted areas (annual mean concentration of smoke > 281 μg/m 3 ) were on average 82 g (95% CI, 24–140) lighter than those born in the areas with the cleanest air (mean smoke concentration < 67 μg/m3).Chen et al. (2002) examined the association between PM 10 , CO, and O 3 and birth weight in northern Nevada (USA) from 1991 through 1999. The results suggested that a 10-μg/m3 increase in the mean PM 10 concentrations during the third trimester of pregnancy was associated a reduction in birth weight of 11 g (95% CI, 2.3–19.8). Wilhelm and Ritz (2003) studied the effecton LBW of residential proximity to heavy traffic in Los Angeles County, California (USA) in 1994–1996. The risk of term LBW increased by 19% for each 1 ppm increase in the mean annual concentration of background CO. In addition, an elevated risk was observed for women whose third trimester fell during the fall/winter months (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.16–1.67); this is probably due to the more stagnant air conditions during the winterperiod. Overall, the study reported an approximately 10–20% increase in the risk of term LBW in infants born to women exposed to high levels of traffic-related air pollution. A time-series study in Vancouver, Canada, found that LBW was associated with SO 2 in the first month of pregnancy (OR per 5 ppb increase, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01–1.22); NO 2 , CO, and O 3 were not independently associated with LBW (Liu et al. 2003). Particles were not measured. A time-series study in Sao Paulo, Brazil, found that birth weight was inversely related to CO in the first trimester; after controlling for potential confounders, a 1-ppm increase in the mean CO concentration in the first trimester was associated with a 23-g (95% CI, 5–41 g) reduction in birth weight (Gouveia et al. 2004). The results of studies of outdoor exposures are complemented by studies of indoor and personal exposures (not included in Table 2). Boy et al. (2002) compared the association between birth weight and the type of fuel (open fires with wood smoke, chimney stove,and electricity/gas) used in kitchens by mothers in rural Guatemala during pregnancy. The use of open fire produced average levels of
24-hr PM 10 of about 1,000 μg/m3 . Babies of mothers using wood fuel and open fires were on average 63 g (95% CI, 0.4–126 g) lighter than those of women using electricity/gas. Perera et al. (2003) evaluated the effects of prenatal exposure to airborne carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) monitored during pregnancy by personal air sampling in a sample of 263 nonsmoking African-American and Dominican women in New York. The mean total PAH exposure was 3.7 ng/m 3 (range, 0.4–36.5 ng/m 3). Among African Americans, high prenatal exposure to PAHs was associated with lower birth weight ( p = 0.003) and smaller head circumference ( p = 0.01). No such effects were observed among Dominican women. Several methodologic issues should beconsidered in the interpretation of these studies. First, could chance (random error) play a role here? In several of the studies reviewed above, there is a potential problem of multiple comparisons. The more comparisons that are made, the higher the probability that some of them will be “statistically significant.” In some instances, a more stringent use of statistical testing would be useful. Especially in studieswhere exposures to different pollutants at different pregnancy periods were analyzed, some of the associations could be chance findings. In addition, exposures in different pregnancyperiods and concentrations of different pollutants are mutually correlated, and efforts to separate their effects are not reliable.Second, as with infant mortality, confounding by socioeconomic factors and maternal smoking could affect the results. Overall,however, this seems unlikely for the same reasons as those listed above in “Air pollution and childhood mortality.” In addition, some of thestudies were able to control for social conditions and maternal smoking at the individual level, and the results were essentially identical. In terms of the magnitude of the effect, the results were consistent in suggesting that the effects are relatively small. For comparison, it has been estimated that active smoking in pregnancy leads to a reduction in birth weight by approximately 150–200 g (Adriaanse et al. 1996), and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pregnancy results in birth weight reduction by approximately 20–30 g(Windham et al. 1999). There were also substantial inconsistencies in the results withrespect to the importance of individual pollutants and the timing of critical exposure. The extent of the inconsistencies was such that the studies were not “combinable” into a formalmeta-analysis to produce pooled effect estimates, although it is possible that the mix of pollutants differs between different settings and that this underlies the discrepancies in results. The evidence suggests causality of the effect of air pollution on birth weight. However, given the potential problem with multiple comparisons and the heterogeneity of results, further studies are needed to confirm that the Review 

## | S ˇ rám et al.



### 378 VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 • Environmental Health Perspectiveseffect is indeed causal, to clarify the most vulnerable periods of pregnancy and the role of individual pollutants, and to examine whether the impaired reproductive outcomes have any long-term consequences on child health. Air pollution and premature births.Perhaps the first study that suggested a possible association between air pollution and preterm births was the Nashville Air Pollution Study; the results suggested that dust fall (ameasure of particulate pollution) was associated with neonatal deaths among premature births (Sprague and Hagstrom 1969).However, the study did not address the question of preterm births specifically, and therewere concerns about confounding by socioeconomic variables. It was only in the 1990s when this issue was investigated in more detail (Table 3). The first “modern” investigation of thepossible influence of air pollution on premature birth was a time-series study in Beijing, China, conducted by Xu et al. (1995). The study found an inverse relationship between gestational age and the concentration of SO 2 and TSP; the RRs of premature birth associated with a 100-μg/m 3 increase in the

mean SO 2 and TSP concentrations duringpregnancy, after controlling for potential confounders, were 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01–1.45) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01–1.20), respectively. Trimester-specific effects were not studied. Bobak (2000) examined the relation between premature birth and ambient NO

x, SO 2, and TSP during each trimester. The association was strongest for SO 2, weaker for TSP, and only marginal for NO

x. For exposures during the first trimester, the RRs associated with a 50-ng/m 3 increase in pollutant concentrations were 1.27 (95% CI, 1.16–1.39) and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.05–1.31) for SO 2 and TSP,respectively. The effects of pollutants on premature births in the later two trimesters were weak. The possible impact of CO, NO 2 , O 3 , and PM 10 on premature birth was studied by Ritz et al. (2000) in Southern California. After adjustment for a number of biologic, social, and ethnic covariates, premature births were associated with CO and PM 10 in the first gestational month and during late pregnancy. The RR associated with PM 10 during the first gestational month was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06–1.26); exposure in the last 6 weeks of gestation was associated with an RR of 1.20 (95% CI, 1.09–1.33). The association ofpremature birth with CO levels was not consistent throughout the study area. In a study in a petrochemically polluted area in Taiwan, Lin et al. (2001a) found an RR of preterm birth in the polluted area, compared with the clean area, of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.08–1.82), after controlling for potential confounders. The Vancouver time-series study found that the risk of preterm birth was associated with SO 2 and CO during the last month of pregnancy; the ORs were 1.09 (1.01–1.19 per 5-ppb increase) and 1.08 (1.01–1.15 per 1-ppm increase), respectively (Liu et al. 2003). The interpretation of the studies of preterm birth is complicated by similar issuesas in the case of birth weight: the issue of multiple comparisons, and the inconsistency of theresults in terms of the role of individual pollutants and the timing of exposure. In addition, there have been fewer studies of prematurebirth than of birth weight. We therefore conclude that the evidence, as yet, is insufficient to infer causality, but further studies are justified. Air pollution and IUGR. IUGR is defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age and sex. IUGR is an interesting end point that may predict functional changes in adulthood, such as hypertension and coronary heart disease. The studies of the relationship between IUGR and air pollution are summarized in Table 4. Dejmek et al. (1999) examined the impact of PM 10 and PM 2.5 on IUGR in a highly polluted area of northern Bohemia (Teplice District). The mean concentration of pollutants in each month of gestation for each mother were estimated from continuous monitoring data. A significantly increased risk of giving birth to a child with IUGR was established for mothers who were exposed to

PM 10 levels > 40 μg/m3 or PM2.5 > 27 μg/m3 during the first month of gestation. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) associated with a 10-μg/m 3 increase in PM 10 was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.08–1.56); a similar, although weaker, association was seen for PM2.5 . There was no association between IUGR and particulate levels in later gestational months or with SO 2 , NO

x, or O 3 (Dejmek et al. 1996). The question of IUGR was addressed again in a reanalysis of an extended data set (Dejmek et al. 2000). Compared with exposure to the

mean PM 10 of < 40 μg/m 3 during the first month of gestation, the AOR was 1.44 (95% CI, 1.03–2.02) for the medium-exposure group (PM 10 40 to < 50 μg/m 3 ) and 2.14 (95% CI, 1.42–3.23) for PM 10 of ≥ 50 μg/m3

. Using a continuous exposure, the AOR of IUGR was 1.19 (CI, 1.06–1.33) per 10-μg/m3

increase of PM 10 in the first gestational month. In further analyses of this cohort, Dejmek et al. (2000) investigated the association between carcinogenic PAHs and IUGR in Review 

## | Air pollution and pregnancy outcome

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 

### 379 Table 3. Air pollution and premature births.

Pollutant Results Reference

SO 2 AOR = 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01–1.45) for 100 μg/m 3 increase Xu et al. 1995 TSP AOR = 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01–1.20) for 100 μg/m 3 increase SO 2 AOR = 1.27 (95% CI, 1.16–1.39) for 50 μg/m 3 increase in the 1st trimester Bobak 2000 TSP AOR = 1.18 (95% CI, 1.05–1.31) for 50 μg/m 3 increase in the 1st trimester CO NE Ritz et al. 2000 NO 2 NE O 3 NE
PM 10 RR = 1.16 (95% 1.06–1.26) for 50 μg/m 3 increase in the 1st trimester SO 2 + NO 2 + PM 10 AOR = 1.41 (91% CI, 1.08–1.82) comparing petrochemical and control Lin et al. 2001a municipalities

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; NE, no effect.

Table 4. Air pollution and IUGR.

Outcome Pollutant Results Reference

IUGR SO 2 NE Dejmek et al. 1996 NO
x NE O 3 NE IUGR PM 10 AOR = 2.64 (95% CI, 1.48–4.71) comparing Dejmek et al. 1999
PM 10 > 50 μg/m 3 with PM 10 < 40 μg/m 3 in the first month of pregnancy
PM 2.5 AOR = 2.11 (95% CI, 1.20–3.70) comparing
PM 2.5 > 37 μg/m 3 with PM 2.5 < 27 μg/m 3 in the first month of pregnancy IUGR PM 10 AOR = 2.14 (95% CI, 1.42–3.23) comparing Dejmek et al. 2000
PM 10 > 50 μg/m 3 with PM 10 < 40 μg/m 3 in the first month of pregnancy
PM 2.5 AOR = 1.96 (95% CI, 1.02–3.11) comparing
PM 2.5 > 37 μg/m 3 with PM 2.5 < 27 μg/m 3 in the first month of pregnancy carc-PAHs AOR = 2.15 (95% CI, 1.27–3.63) comparing carc-PAHs > 30 μg/m 3 with carc-PAHs < 15 μg/m 3 in the first month of pregnancy SGA POM AOR = 1.22 (95% CI, 1.16–1.27) comparing Vassilev et al. 2001a highest vs. lowest exposure groups for the term birth

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; carc-PAHs, carcinogenic-PAHs; NE, no effect; SGA, small for gestational age.two Czech districts: Teplice and Prachatice.In the Teplice data, there was a highly significant increase of IUGR with exposures to carcinogenic PAHs (benz[ a]anthracene, benzo[ b ]fluoranthene, benzo[ k ]fluoranthene, benzo[g , h

, i ]perylene, benzo[ a]pyrene, chrysene, dibenz[a , h

]anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-

c , d

]pyrene) above 15 ng/m3 . Again, the effect was specific for the first gestational month. The AORs were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.06–2.39) for medium levels of carcinogenic PAHs and 2.15 (95% CI, 1.27–3.63) for high exposure levels. Using a continuous measure of exposure, a 10 ng/m3 increase in carcinogenic PAH level was associated with an AOR of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.07–1.39). Although there was no effect of

PM 10 on IUGR found in Prachatice, the association between carcinogenic PAHs and IUGR was close to that found in Teplice. Again, theonly consistent association between carcinogenic PAHs and IUGR was observed in the first gestational month: compared with the lowest category of exposure to carcinogenic PAHs, the AOR of IUGR was 1.63 (95% CI, 0.87–3.06) in the medium category and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.01–5.65) in the highest category. The analysis of the Czech national birth register linked with air pollution data did not reveal any significant association between IUGR and ambient levels of NO

x, SO 2 , and TSP (Bobak 2000). The discrepancy betweenthe Czech studies is probably related to exposure measurement. PAHs appear to be the
critical exposure for IUGR, but PAHs were not measured by the national monitoring system used for exposure estimation by Bobak (2000).Vassilev et al. (2001a) examined the association of POM in outdoor air with “small for gestational age” (SGA) births (the definition of SGA is identical to that of IUGR). Information from birth certificates in New Jersey (USA) from 1991 through 1992 was combined with data on air toxicity derived from the U.S. EPA Cumulative ExposureProject, using the predicted POM concentrations from annual exposure estimates. The AOR for term SGA in the highest exposure tertile (0.61–2.83 μg/m 3 , which includes about 89% of the state’s births) was 1.22(95% CI, 1.16–1.27), suggesting that residential exposure to airborne POM is associated with an increased prevalence of IUGR.In the Vancouver study, using the timeseries approach, SO 2 , NO 2 , and CO in the first month of pregnancy were associated with IUGR; the ORs were 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01–1.13) per 5-ppb increase, 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01–1.10) per 10-ppb increase, and 1.06 (95% CI, 1.01–1.10) per 1-ppm increase,respectively (Liu et al. 2003). Data on exposures to particles or PAHs were not available in that study. As with studies of birth weight and preterm births, the reviewed studies of IUGR produced inconsistent results, and the interpretation is complicated by multiple comparisons (Bobak 2000; Liu et al. 2003) and mutual correlations of exposures. The results by Dejmek et al. (1999, 2000) and Liu et al. (2003) suggest that the first month was themost sensitive period for the effect of air pollutants, but further studies should clarify this issue. Data by Dejmek et al. (2000) and Vassilev et al. (2001a) imply a critical role of PAHs. It is possible that carcinogenic PAHs are responsible for the biologic activity of complex mixtures adsorbed to respirable air particles that can result in IUGR. With the increase in traffic, the significance of PAHs in Europe is growing, but their monitoring remains scarce. At present, the evidence is insufficient to infer causality, but further studies are required. Air pollution and birth defects. At present, the evidence on the relation between outdoor air pollution and birth defects is limited to only one report. Ritz et al. (2002) evaluated the effect of CO, NO 2, O 3 , and PM 10 on the occurrence of birth defects in Southern California for the period 1987–1993. The average monthly exposure for each pollutant throughout pregnancy was calculated. Dose–response patterns were observed for CO exposure in the second month of gestation and ventricular septal defects (AOR for the highest vs. lowest quartile of exposure, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.44–6.05) and for exposure to O 3 in the second month and aortic artery and valve defects (AOR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.19–6.05). Given the lack of studies on air pollution and birth defects, the evidence base available so far is insufficient to draw conclusions about causality. Further studies are required to support these results by Ritz et al. (2002).



### Discussion

The studies reviewed above indicate that ambient air pollution is inversely associated with a number of birth outcomes. This is arelatively new area of environmental epidemiology; most reports have emerged over the last 10 years. A critical assessment of the evidence is therefore timely. Issues pertinent to different studies were considered separately above. Here, we consider questions common to allreproductive outcomes: publication bias, measurement of exposure, and the biologic plausibility of the effects on birth weight, IUGR, and preterm births.
Publication bias. Negative studies are less likely to be published, and studies published in non-English journals are less likely to be included in reviews. We included all studies we were able to identify. We cannot exclude the possibility that some negative studies, especially in the earlier period, remain unpublished. However, given the recent interest in this topic, it is likely that most studies over the last decade have been published or at least presented at conferences. Measurement of exposure. Most studies relied on routine monitoring of air pollution in large areas. Extrapolation from citywide or areawide measurements to individual exposures can be problematic. In this context, molecular epidemiologic studies are particularly valuable for the interpretation of the epidemiologic data. The molecular epidemiologic studies used biomarkers of exposure, mainly as the DNA adducts measured by 32 P-postlabelingand PAH–DNA adducts assessed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assays (S ˇ rám and Binková 2000). Overall, these studies suggest that DNA adduct levels in maternal blood andplacentas are higher in areas with higher pollution levels (S ˇ rám et al. 1999; Whyatt et al.1998), and significant district and seasonal differences in DNA adducts were found in subgroups with the GSTM1 null genotype (Topinka et al. 1997a, 1997b). The increase in the levels of DNA adducts related to pollution is similar to, but smaller in magnitude than,the differences between smoking and nonsmoking mothers. All this indicates that ambient air pollution levels do translate to higher individual exposures, even for unborn babies. This provides support for the validity of the epidemiologic studies reviewed above. DNA adducts in placentas and the impactof PAHs on IUGR are consistent with findings of in vitro studies that exposure to extracts of urban air PM increased DNA adducts and embryotoxicity (Binková et al. 1999, 2003). These findings indicate that particle-bound carcinogenic PAH concentrations may be taken as an index of the biologically active components in samples of particulates in air. Biologic plausibility. The molecular epidemiologic studies suggest biologic mechanisms for the effect of air pollution on birth outcomes. It has been shown that the levels of DNA adducts are positively related to risk of IUGR (Dejmek at al 2000; S ˇ rám et al. 1999), birth weight, birth length, and head circumference (Perera et al. 1998, 1999), andhypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase ( HPRT ) locus mutation frequency in infants (Perera et al. 2002). PAHs and/or their metabolites may bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and accumulate in the nucleus of cells, resulting in increased rates of mutagenesis. Because PAHsbind to the AhR, it may result in antiestrogenic activity through increased metabolism and the depletion of endogenousestrogens (Carpenter et al. 2002), thus disrupting the endocrine system by altering steroid function. Bui et al. (1986) hypothesized that benzo[a]pyrene exposure may interfere with uterine growth during pregnancy because of its antiestrogenic effects, thereby disrupting the endocrine system. Fetal toxicity Review 

## | S ˇ rám et al.



### 380 VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 • Environmental Health Perspectivesmay be further caused by DNA damage resulting in activation of apoptotic pathways (Nicolet al. 1995) or binding to receptors for placental growth factors resulting in decreased exchange of oxygen and nutrients (Dejmek et al. 2000). The finding of higher DNA adduct levelsin the infant compared with the mother suggests an increased susceptibility of the developing fetus to DNA damage (Perera et al. 1999). With respect to IUGR, it appears that the increased risk is principally due to exposure to carcinogenic PAHs. This finding is consistent with the idea of a primary role for carcinogenic PAHs in fetal growth modulation (Guyda 1991; MacKenzie and Angevine 1981; Rigdon and Rennels 1964; Zhang et al. 1995). Pereraet al. (2003) labeled PAHs as significant independent determinants of birth outcomes. In addition, there appears to be an interaction between exposure to PAHs and genotypes that produce DNA adducts (Whyatt et al. 2001).Although the specific steps of these pathways need to be further clarified, the molecular epidemiology studies and the similarity of effects of air pollution to those of smoking (Adriaanse et al. 1996; Windham et al. 1999) support the biologic plausibility of the
effects.



### Conclusions
Overall, there is evidence implicating air pollution in adverse effects on different birth outcomes, but the strength of the evidence differs between outcomes. The evidence is sufficientto infer a causal relationship between particulate air pollution and respiratory deaths in the postneonatal period. For air pollution and birth weight, the evidence is suggestive of causality, although further studies are needed. For preterm births and IUGR, the evidence as yet is insufficient to infer causality, but the available evidence justifies further studies.Molecular epidemiologic studies suggest possible biologic mechanisms for the effect on birthweight, premature birth, and IUGR and support the view that the relation between pollution and these birth outcomes is genuine. Forbirth defects, the evidence base so far is insufficient to draw conclusions. In terms of exposure to specific pollutants, particulates seem the most important for infant deaths, and the effect on IUGR seems linked to PAHs, but theexisting evidence does not allow precise identification of the different pollutants and the timing of exposure that can result in adverse

pregnancy outcomes. On the basis of this review, we suggest several priorities for future research. First, it remains to be confirmed that the effects onbirth weight, prematurity, and IUGR are genuine and causal. Second, it is important toidentify the most vulnerable period of exposure in pregnancy. Third, the contribution of different pollutants needs to be established. Fourth, the biologic pathways require further clarification. And finally, with the increasingattention to the life course, it would be interesting to examine whether early exposures and impaired reproductive outcome have any long-term consequences in later life.

R EFERENCES

Adriaanse HP, Knottnerus JA, Delgado LR, Cox HH, Essed GGM. 1996. Smoking in Dutch women and birth weight. Patient

Educ Couns 28:25–30. Alderman BW, Baron AE, Saviz DA. 1987. Maternal exposure to neighborhood carbon monoxide and risk of low infant birth weight. Public Health Rep 102:410–414. Axelrod D, Davis DL, Hajek RA, Jones LA. 2001. It’s time to rethink dose: the case for combining cancer, and birth and developmental defects [Editorial]. Environ Health Perspect

109:A246–A249. Barker DJP. 1995. The fetal and infant origins of disease. Eur J
Clin Invest 25:457–463. Binková B, Cerna M, Pastorkova A, Jelinek R, Benes I, Novak J, et al. 2003. Biological activities of organic compounds adsorbed onto ambient air particles: comparison between the cities of Teplice and Prague during the summer and

winter seasons 2000–2001. Mutat Res 525:43–59. Binková B, Vesely D, Veselá D, Jelínek R, S ˇ rám RJ. 1999.Genotoxicity and embryotoxicity of urban air particulate matter collected during winter and summer period in two different districts of the Czech Republic. Mutat Res 440:45–58.Bobak M. 2000. Outdoor pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity. Environ Health Perspect 108:173–176. Bobak M, Leon DA. 1992. Air pollution and infant mortality in the Czech Republic, 1986–88. Lancet 310:1010–1014. Bobak M, Leon DA. 1999a. The effect of air pollution on infant mortality appears specific for respiratory causes in the postneonatal period. Epidemiology 10:666–670. Bobak M, Leon DA. 1999b. Pregnancy outcomes and outdoor air pollution: an ecological study in districts of the Czech Republic. Occup Environ Med 56:539–543. Bobak M, Richards M, Wadsworth M. 2001. Air pollution and birth weight in Britain in 1946. Epidemiology 12:358–359. Boy E, Bruce N, Delgado H. 2002. Birth weight and exposure to kitchen wood smoke during pregnancy in rural Guatemala. Environ Health Perspect 110:109–114. Brunekreef B, Holgate ST. 2002. Air pollution and health.

Lancet 360:1233–1242. Bui QQ, Tran MB, West WL. 1986. A comparative study of the reproductive effects of methadone and benzo[ a]pyrene in the pregnant and pseudopregnant rat. Toxicology 42:195–204. Calabrese EJ. 1986. Age and Susceptibility to Toxic Substances. New York:Wiley & Sons. Carpenter DO, Arcaro K, Spink DC. 2002. Understanding the

human health effects of chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 110(suppl 1):25–42. Chen L, Yang W, Jennison BL, Goodrich A, Omaye ST. 2002. Air pollution and birth weight in northern Nevada, 1991–1999.

Inhal Toxicol 14:141–157. Collins JJ, Kasap HS, Holland WW. 1971. Environmental factors in child mortality in England and Wales. Am J Epidemiol

93:10–22. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Benes ˇ I, Solansky I, S ˇ rám RJ. 1999. Fetal growth and parental exposure to particulate matter during gestation. Environ Health Perspect 107:475–480. Dejmek J, Selevan SG, Benes ˇ I, S ˇ rám RJ. 1996. Impact of selected air pollutants on the prevalence of low birth weight and prematurity [Abstract]. Epidemiology 7:S26. Dejmek J, Solansky I, Benes ˇ I, Leníc ˇek J, S ˇ rám RJ. 2000. Theimpact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles on pregnancy outcome. Environ Health Perspect

108:1159–1164.Dockery DW, Pope CA III. 1994. Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 15:107–132. Dockery DW, Pope CA III, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME,et al. 1993. The association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. N Engl J Med 329:1753–1759. Dolk H, Pattenden S, Vrijheid M, Thakrar B, Armstrong B. 2000. Perinatal and infant mortality and low birth weight among
residents near cokeworks in Great Britain. Arch Environ

Health 55:26–30. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pless-Mulloli, Howel D. 2004. Particulate air pollution and fetal health. A systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiology

15:36–45. Gouveia N, Bremner SA, Novaes HM. 2004. Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Epidemiol Community Health 58(1):11–17.Guyda HJ. 1991. Metabolic effects of growth factors and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on cultured human placental cells of early and late gestation. J Clin Endocrinol

Metab 72:718–723. Ha EH, Hong YC, Lee BE, Woo BH, Schwartz J, Christiani DC. 2001. Is air pollution a risk factor for low birth weight in Seoul? Epidemiology 12:643–648. Ha EH, Lee JT, Kim H, Hong YC, Lee BE, Park HS, et al. 2003. Infant susceptibility of mortality to air pollution in Seoul,

South Korea. Pediatrics 111:284–290. Heinrich J, Hoelscher B, Wjst M, Ritz B, Cyrys J, Wichmann H. 1999. Respiratory diseases and allergies in two polluted areas in East Germany. Environ Health Perspect 107:53–62. Künzli N, Kaiser R, Medina S, Studnicka M, Chanel O, Fillinger P,et al. 2000. Public-health impact of outdoor and trafficrelated air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet

356:795–801. Lave LB, Seskin EP. 1977. Air Pollution and Human Health. Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press. Lin MC, Chiu HF, Yu HS, Tsai SS, Cheng BH, Wu TN, et al. 2001a.Increased risk of preterm delivery in areas with air pollution from a petroleum refinery plant in Taiwan. J Toxicol

Environ Health 64:637–644. Lin MC, Yu HS, Tsai SS, Cheng BH, Hsu TY, Wu TN, et al. 2001b. Adverse pregnancy outcome in a petrochemical polluted

area in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health 63:565–574. Liu S, Krewski D, Shi Y, Chen Y, Burnett RT. 2003. Associationbetween gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada. Environ Health Perspect 111:1773–1778. Loomis D, Castillejos M, Gold RG, McDonnell W, Borja-Aburto VH. 1999. Air pollution and infant mortality in Mexico City. Epidemiology 10:118–123. MacKenzie KM, Angevine DM. 1981. Infertility in mice exposed in utero to benzo( a)pyrene. Biol Reprod 24:183–191. Maisonet M, Bush TJ, Correa A, Jaakkola JJK. 2001. Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth weight in the northeastern United States. Environ Health Perspect 109(suppl 3):351–356. Maisonet M, Correa A, Misra D, Jaakkola JJK. 2004. A review of the literature on the effects of ambient air pollution on fetal growth. Environ Res 95:106–115. Misra DP, Nguyen RH. 1999. Environmental tobacco smoke and low birth weight: a hazard in the workplace? Environ Health Perspect 107(suppl 6):897–904. Nicol CJ, Harrison ML, Laposa RR, Gimelshtein IL, Wells PG. 1995. A teratologic suppressor role for p53 in benzo[ a]pyrenetreated transgenic p53-deficient mice. Nat Genet 10:181–187. Osmond C, Baker DJP. 2000. Fetal, infant and childhood growth are predictors of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension in adult men and women. Environ Health Perspect 18:545–553. Penna MLF, Duchiade MP. 1991. Air pollution and infant mortality from pneumonia in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 25:47–54. Pereira LA, Loomis D, Conceicao GMS, Braga ALF, Arcas RM, Kishi HS, et al. 1998. Association between air pollution and intrauterine mortality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health Perspect 106:325–329. Perera FP, Hemminki K, Jedrychowski W, Whyatt R, Campbell U, Hsu Y, et al. 2002. In utero DNA damage from environmental pollution is associated with somatic gene mutation in newborns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

11:1134–1137. Perera FP, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Whyatt RM. 1999. Molecularepidemiologic research on the effect of environmental pollutants on the fetus. Environ Health Perspect 107:451–460. Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, Kinney P, Camann D, Barr D, et al. 2003. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect 111:201–205. Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Rauh V, Manchester D, Santella RM, et al. 1998. Recent developments in molecularepidemiology. A study of the environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on birth outcomes in Poland. Am J Epidemiol 147:309–314. Pope CA, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle MJ, Krewski D, Ito K, Review 

## | Air pollution and pregnancy outcome

Environmental Health Perspectives • VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 

### 381et al. 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA

287:1132–1141. Rigdon RH, Rennels EG. 1964. Effect of feeding benzpyrene on reproduction in the rat. Experientia 20:224–226. Ritz B, Yu F. 1999. The effect of ambient carbon monoxide on low birth weight among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993. Environ Health Perspect 107:17–25. Ritz B, Yu F, Chapa G, Fruin S. 2000. Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology 5:502–511. Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, Chapa G, Shaw GM, Harris JA. 2002. Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in Southern California. Am J Epidemiol 155:17–24. Rogers JF, Thompson SJ, Addy CL, McKeown RE, Cowen DJ, Decoufle P. 2000. Association of very low birth weight withexposures to environmental sulfur dioxide and total suspended particulates. Am J Epidemiol 151:602–613. Saldiva PHN, Pope CA III, Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Lichtenfels AJF, Salge JM, et al. 1995. Air pollution and mortality in elderly people: a time series study in São Paulo, Brazil. Arch Environ Health 50:159–163. Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Aliyu MH, Alexander MR, Kirby RS,

Alexander GR. 2004. Stillbirths and infant deaths associated with maternal smoking among mothers aged ≥ 40 years: a population study. Am J Perinatol 21:121–9. Schwartz J, Dockery DW, Neas LM, Wypij D, Ware JH,Spengler JD, et al. 1994. Acute effects of summer air pollution on respiratory symptom reporting in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150:1234–1242. Schwartz J, Marcus A. 1990. Mortality and air pollution in London: a time series analysis. Am J Epidemiol 131:185–194. Sprague HA, Hagstrom R. 1969. The Nashville Air Pollution Study: mortality multiple regression. Arch Environ Health

18:503–507.
S ˇ rám RJ. 1999. Impact of air pollution on reproductive health [Editorial]. Environ Health Perspect 107:A542–A543.

S ˇ rám RJ, Binková B. 2000. Molecular epidemiology studies on occupational and environmental exposure to mutagens and carcinogens, 1997–1999. Environ Health Perspect 108:57–69.
S ˇ rám RJ, Binková B, Rössner P, Rubes ˇ J, Topinka J, Dejmek J. 1999. Adverse reproductive outcomes from exposure to environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 428:203–215. Topinka J, Binková B, Mrac ˇková G, Stávková Z, Benes ˇ I, Dejmek J, et al. 1997a. DNA adducts in human placenta as related to air pollution and to GSTM1 genotype. Mutat Res 390:59–68. Topinka J, Binková B, Mrac ˇková G, Stávková Z, Peterka V,

Benesˇ I, et al. 1997b. Influence of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on placental DNA adducts in an environmentally exposed population. Environ Mol Mutagen 30:184–195.Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. 2001a. Association of polycyclic organic matter in outdoor air with decreased birth weight: a pilot cross-sectional analysis. J Toxicol Environ

Health 64:595–605. Vassilev ZP, Robson MG, Klotz JB. 2001b. Outdoor exposure toairborne polycyclic organic matter and adverse reproductive outcomes: a pilot study. Am J Ind Med 40:255–262. Wang X, Ding H, Ryan L, Xu X. 1997. Association between air pollution and low birth weight: a community-based study. Environ Health Perspect 105:514–520. Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Hemminki K, Santella RM,Tsai WY, Yang K, et al. 2001. Biomarkers of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA damage and cigarette smoke exposure in paired maternal and newborn blood samples as a measure of differential susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:581–588. Whyatt RM, Santella RM, Jedrychowski W, Garte SJ, Bell DA, Ottman R, et al. 1998. Relationship between ambient airpollution and DNA damage in Polish mothers and newborns. Environ Health Perspect 106:821–826. Wilhelm M, Ritz B. 2003. Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994–1996. Environ Health Perspect 111:207–216.Windham GC, Eaton A, Hopkins B. 1999. Evidence for an association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and birthweight: a meta-analysis and new data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 13:35–57. Woodruff T, Grillo J, Schoendorf KC. 1997. The relationship between selected causes of postnatal infant mortality and particulate air pollution in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 105:608–612.Xu X, Ding H, Wang X. 1995. Acute effects of total suspended particles and sulfur dioxides on preterm delivery; a communitybased cohort study. Arch Environ Health 50:407–415. Zhang L, Connor EE, Chegini N, Shiverick KT. 1995. Modulation by benzo[ a]pyrene of epidermal growth factor receptors, cell proliferation, and secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin in human placental lines. Biochem Pharmacol

50:1171–1180. Review 

## | S ˇ rám et al.



### 382 VOLUME 113 | NUMBER 4 | April 2005 • Environmental Health Perspectives