T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A R A C E L I H E RN A N D E Z ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74986 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 385- 884

A 096- 385- 880 A 096- 385- 881 A 096- 385- 883 ME MOR AN DU M * O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A r a c e l i H e rna nde z a nd thr e e of he rs ons , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, p e titio n f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e r s d is m is s in g th e ir appe a l s f r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i ons de ny i ng the i rappl i c a t i ons for w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture



# FI LED NO V 19 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74986 2 ( “ C A T ” ) . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or s u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e , Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1015 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , a nd we d e n yi n p a rta n dd i s m i s s i n p a rtth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatthe threa t s pet i t i on er s re ce i ved from po l i ce af

t erthey s ou gh tt o fi l e acom pl ai ntagai nsta pol i ce offi ce r a m o u n te dto p e r s e c u tio n o rd e m o n s tr a te dac le a rp r o b ab ilityo f p e r s e c u tio n . See Li m v . I NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 936- 38 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( unf ul f i l l e d thr e a t s , w i thout m o r e , g e n e r a llyd o n o t c o n s titu te p e r s e c u tio n ) ; R am adan v. G on zales , 479 F . 3d 646, 658 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( thr e a t s a l one di d notde m ons tr a t e ac l e a rpr obabi l i tyof p e r s e c u tio n ) . A c c o r d in g ly , p e titio n e r s ’ w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See 8 U . S . C . § 1 23 1(b)(3). W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w a nya s s e rt i on byH e rna nde z ’ s s on, R a y m undo S a n A u g u s tin - H e rn a n d e z , th a t h e is e lig ib le f o rC A T r e lie f

, b e c au s e h e s p e c if

ic a lly d e c lin e dto ap p lyf

o rth a t r e lie f

b e f o r e th e I J . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) . S u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e s u p p o rt s th e I J ’ s d e n i a l o f C AT rel i ef t o th e rem ai n i n g p et i t i o n ers b ecau se th ey fai l ed t o est ab l i sh i ti s m o re l i k el y07- 74986 3 tha n nottha tthe yw i l l be t ortur e d i f r e turne d t o M e xi c o. See W akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 67 -68 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.