alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6207

    To amend the National Quantum Initiative Act to accelerate the 
     development of supply chain supporting technology for quantum 
  information science, technology, and engineering to support United 
 States competitiveness, reduce risks in the quantum supply chain, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2023

  Mrs. Sykes (for herself and Mr. Crawford) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 
                               Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the National Quantum Initiative Act to accelerate the 
     development of supply chain supporting technology for quantum 
  information science, technology, and engineering to support United 
 States competitiveness, reduce risks in the quantum supply chain, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support for Quantum Supply Chains 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR 
              QUANTUM SUPPLY CHAINS.

    (a) Amendments to the National Quantum Initiative Act.--Section 201 
of the National Quantum Initiative Act (15 U.S.C. 8831) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (6), by striking the ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                paragraph:
            ``(8) shall establish or expand partnerships with public 
        and private sector entities to--
                    ``(A) accelerate the development of domestic 
                quantum supply chain and supply chain-supporting 
                technologies; and
                    ``(B) reduce quantum supply chain 
                vulnerabilities.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(D) to identify quantum supply chain and supply 
                chain-supporting technologies necessary to ensure 
                United States competitiveness in quantum information 
                science, technology, and engineering.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,961,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,017,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,775,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,867,246
<PP&E>                                      13,069,786
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,368,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,888,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,058,066
<BONDS>                                      1,706,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,843
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,448,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,888,945
<SALES>                                     17,346,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       14,139,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,700,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,531,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                   605,309
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            925,886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   925,886
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
Jason P. REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3178

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Kendra A. KLAUS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel J. HAMILTON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 18, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Yussel ESTEVEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1745

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stanley Gordon WHEELER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4741

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 5, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-Q of NCI Building Systems, Inc.;2.
    
    This quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and3.
    
    The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NCI Building Systems, Inc.
  /s/ Norman C. ChambersNorman C. ChambersChairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)   46
Ronnie Lenear COLVIN v. STATE

CR-15-1457

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00177-CR

Alejandro Leal PENA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-090168-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On March 27, 2014, appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a motion to withdraw as 

appellate counsel. The motion is GRANTED. Since appellant is indigent, new appellate counsel 

must be appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED to the trial court. See 

Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may 

abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). The 

trial court is ORDERED to appoint new appellate counsel and to cause the trial court clerk to file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing documentation of such appointment within fifteen days 

from the date this order is signed.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Adan JONJITUD-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40586 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Adan Jonjitud-Antonio, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adan Jonjitud-Antonio has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jonjitud-Antonio has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to- withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Jason Matthew SIMMONS v. STATE

CR-15-1466

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017 Reh. denied May 26, 2017

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No.  333-83875) of Wake Forest  Bancshares,  Inc. of
our report  dated  October  14,  2000,  relating to the  consolidated  financial
condition of Wake Forest  Bancshares,  Inc. and  subsidiary  as of September 30,
2000,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2000,  appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Wake Forest Bancshares, Inc.




/s/ Dixon Odom PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina
December 21, 2000









                                       34
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code.

Ray E. Winborne, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    RAY E. WINBORNE        
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Ray E. Winborne               
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2011

Mr. Anthony Power

Chief Executive Officer Emivest Aerospace Corporation 1770 Skyplace Boulevard

San Antonio, TX 78216

Dear Mr. Power:

We have received your April 25, 2011, correspondence withdrawing your December 2, 2010, petition on behalf of Emivest Aerospace Corporation for an exemption from § 21.123(g) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2010-1244). No further action will be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: September 14, 2009

Tracking No. 80a0635c

Comments Due: September 14, 2009

Docket: DARS-2009-0023

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Limitation on Procurements on Behalf of 

DoD (DFARS Case 2008-D005)

Comment On: DARS-2009-0023-0001

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Limitation on Procurements on Behalf of 

DoD (DFARS Case 2008-D005)

Document: DARS-2009-0023-0002

Public Comments 2008-D005-D.Mansfield

Submitter Information

Name: Donald Mansfield

Email: Donald.Mansfield@dau.mil

General Comment

To whom it may concern:

I believe that the final rule needs to include a definition of “Governmentwide 

acquisition contract”, which appears in the definition of “Direct acquisition”, that is 

specific to subpart 217.78. The term has a specific definition in the statute that 

differs from the definition at FAR 2.101. Here is the definition from the statute 

(Section 801, paragraph (f)(3)):

(3) GOVERNMENT-WIDE ACQUISITION 

CONTRACT- The term `government-wide acquisition contract' means a task or 

delivery order contract that--

(A) is entered into by a 

non-defense agency; and

(B) may be used as the 

contract under which property or services are procured for one or more other 

departments or agencies of the Federal Government.

Here is the definition at FAR 2.101:
“Governmentwide acquisition contract (GWAC)” means a task-order or deliveryorder contract for information technology established by one agency for 

Governmentwide use that is operated—

(1) By an executive agent designated by the Office of Management and Budget 

pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 11302(e) 

getdoc+uscview+t37t40+1574+51++%2840%29%20%20AND%20%28%2840%

29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20> ; or 

(2) Under a delegation of procurement authority issued by the General Services 

Administration (GSA) prior to August 7, 1996, under authority granted GSA by former 

section 40 U.S.C. 759 

getdoc+uscview+t37t40+1574+51++%2840%29%20%20AND%20%28%2840%

29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20> , 

repealed by Pub. L. 104-106. The Economy Act does not apply to orders under a 

Governmentwide acquisition contract. 

[Italics added]

As you can see, the FAR definition is more specific. If the term is not defined 

differently in the final rule, some may interpret the requirements at DFARS 217.7802

(b) as being applicable to “Governmentwide acquisition contracts” as that term is 

defined at FAR 2.101.

Donald E. Mansfield
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Guadalupe DE HOYOS-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41498 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Guadalupe De Hoyos-Lopez, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent José Guadalupe De Hoyos-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.?d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De Hoyos-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s' assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Robert Wayne CONNELLY, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1082

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 28, 2018

Robert Wayne Connelly, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. *See**Baker v. State* , 878 So.2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004) ("[F]rom now on, we will dismiss as unauthorized, habeas corpus petitions filed by noncapital defendants that seek the kind of collateral postconviction relief available through a motion filed in the sentencing court, and which (1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850, (2) raise claims that could have been raised at trial or, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence, or (3) would be considered a second or successive motion under rule 3.850 that either fails to allege new or different grounds for relief, or alleges new or different grounds for relief that were known or should have been known at the time the first motion was filed.").

Roberts, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6024 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 

to extend the increased transfer authority for a certain study on perand polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania (for herself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the 

following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2018 to extend the increased transfer authority 

for a certain study on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances 

contamination in drinking water, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PFAS Health Study 

5 Act of 2023’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6024 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INCREASED TRANSFER AUTHORITY 

2 FOR FUNDING OF CERTAIN STUDY ON PER3 AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES CON4 TAMINATION IN DRINKING WATER. 

5 Section 316(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the National Defense Au6 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115– 

7 91; 131 Stat. 1350), as most recently amended by section 

8 342 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

9 Year 2023 (Public Law 117–263; 136 Stat. 2529), is fur10 ther amended by striking ‘‘during fiscal year 2023’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘a year during fiscal years 2023 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RAE Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                   
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------
|               |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert I. Chen                
|               |  |    
|March 16, 2005 |  |     |  | Robert I. Chen                    
|               |  |     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer
|               |  |     |  | and Chairman of the Board         



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Energy & Resource Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Dmitry Vilbaum, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  April 15, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Dmitry Vilbaum      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Dmitry Vilbaum          |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |