alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX PARTE Mitchell MARBURY

CR-16-0609

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Exhibit






2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards
Acceptance Form
As of March 15, 2018, you were granted long-term incentive awards under the Protective Life Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  In conjunction with these awards, you have been provided with Award Letters and the applicable provision documents (“Provisions”).  The Award Letters, Provisions, and the Plan govern your respective 2018 Awards.  The 2018 Awards contain terms and conditions regarding the vesting and payment of the Awards, termination of employment, tax withholding, confidentiality, non-solicitation of Company employees and customers, regulatory compliance, and other important matters.  If you agree to and accept the terms of the 2018 Awards, please sign where indicated below by [Date], 2018. 


[Employee’s electronic signature]


[Rich’s electronic signature]
Rich Bielen
President and Chief Executive Officer 
of Protective Life Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1301 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1301

 To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the 
Comptroller General of the United States to submit to Congress reports 
             regarding White supremacy in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2021

 Mr. Keating introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the 
Comptroller General of the United States to submit to Congress reports 
             regarding White supremacy in the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTS ON WHITE SUPREMACY IN THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Inspector General of the Department of Defense.--Not later than 
90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector 
General of the Department of Defense shall submit to Congress a report 
containing a list of all steps the Inspector General is taking to 
combat White supremacy in the Armed Forces.
    (b) Comptroller General of the United States.--Not later than 180 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 
General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report 
regarding the prevalence of White supremacy in the Armed Forces. Such 
report shall include the recommendations of the Comptroller General, if 
any, regarding legislation to combat White supremacy in the Armed 
Forces.
                                 <all>
```
Dwayne PRYCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-422

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Starsha M. SEWELL, M.Ed., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY; Robert Silberman; Karl McDonnell, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1107

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 9, 2017

Decided: May 17, 2017

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, OGLETREE DEA-KINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this employment discrimination action and imposing a pre-filing injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. *See*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Sewell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Sewell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. *See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,*370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. ■

*AFFIRMED*
Robert Kenneth BENJAMIN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3801

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 27, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

CRENSHAW, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
D.E. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160446

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Nicholas P. BARONE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3579

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
### Project: Vessels Distributional Impact An alysis

Filename Inputs Outputs Purpose/Comments

*Distribution Analysis Inputs

NEW infile. csv N/A N/A Costs by vessel class.

*Distribution Analysis Inputs

NEW NAICSnum. csv N/A N/A Number of vessels by revenue size category.

*Distribution Analysis Inputs

NEW NAICSthresh. csv N/A N/A Revenue thresholds data.

*Distribution Analysis Inputs

NEW NAICSWEIGHTS. csv N/A N/A Number of vessels by NAICS and vessel type.

**DistAnal11samp21NOV_v3.sa

s *Distribution Analysis Inpu ts NEW

infile. csv

*Distribution Analysis Inputs NEW

NAICSnum. csv

*Distribution Analysis Inputs NEW

NAICSthresh. csv

*Distribution Analysis Inputs NEW

NAICSWEIGHTS. csv ***DAO11_Highthresholds_DF. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_DP. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_FF

. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_IF. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_IP. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_MC. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_NS. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_OT. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_PH. xls

***DAO11_Highthresholds_SS. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_DF. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_DP. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_FF. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_IF. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_IP. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_MC. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_NS. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_OT. xls

***DAO11_Lowthresholds_PH. xls

*** DAO11_Lowthresholds_SS. xls

***Dist11_High_DF. xls

***Dist11_High_DP. xls

***Dist11_High_FF. xls

***Dist11_High_IF. xls

***Dist11_High_IP. xls

***Dist11_High_MC. xls

***Dist11_High_NS. xls

***Dist11_High_OT. xls

***Dist11_High_PH. xls

***Dist11_High_SS. xls The program calculates the distri bution of firm cost

impacts by sector and revenue bracket assuming 11

possible vessel costs per vessel class. The

percentage of firms with impacts exceeding 1% and

3% of their revenue is also calculated.

Note: These are the abbreviations used for the N AICS:

DF 483111/483113

FF 11411

DP 483112/483114

IF 483211

IP 483212

SS 487210

PH 488310

MC 488320

NS 488330

OT 488390

### Project: Vessels Distributional Impact An alysis

Filename Inputs Outputs Purpose/Comments

***Dist11_Low_DF. xls

***Dist11_Low_DP. xls

***Dist11_Low_FF. xls

***Dist11_Low_IF. xls

***Dist11_Low_IP. xls

***Dist11_Low_MC. xls

***Dist11_Low_NS. xls

***Dist11_Low_OT. xls

***Dist11_Low_PH. xls

***Dist11_Low_SS. xls

******Distribution Analysis

Output_ 03.21.13_v2 .xls x Outputs from

**DistAnal11samp21NOV_v3.sas re:

the percentage of firms with impacts

exceeding 1% and 3% of their revenue To organize the percentage and number of firms

with impacts exceeding 1% and 3% of their revenue

for the NAICS with more than one vessel class.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Greenworld Development, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leo Heinl, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: September 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Leo HeinlLeo HeinlChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer





_________________________


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been provided  to  Echo Resources,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Echo Resources,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RAE Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|               |  | By: |  | /s/ Donald W. Morgan   
|               |  |    
|March 16, 2005 |  |     |  | Donald W. Morgan       
|               |  |     |  | Vice President and     
|               |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Christian SAGASTUME, Appellant, v. Deryl LOAR and Indian River County Sheriff's Office, Appellees.

No. 4D18-363

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 31, 2018]

Christian Sagastume, Vero Beach, pro se.

James Harping, Vero Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWO FISCAL QUARTERS ENDED JULY 9, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-09-2000
<CASH>                                      18,216,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,714,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   716,994
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,787,202
<PP&E>                                     108,615,249
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,044,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,682,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,310,705
<BONDS>                                    105,437,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  91,279,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               221,682,109
<SALES>                                     39,805,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,700,823
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,607,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,136,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,762,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (830,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,932,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,537,221
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   604,376
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 (Interim Loan)
                                 April 17, 2000

$600,000                                                    San Jose, California


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to Bell Sports, Inc., a
California  corporation  ("Payee"),  the principal  sum of Six Hundred  Thousand
Dollars  ($600,000).  No interest  shall  accrue or be payable on the  principal
balance  provided that the principal  balance is timely paid in accordance  with
the following terms.

     Interest  will be imputed at the rate of six  percent  (6%) per annum,  and
shall be added to the W-2 of the undersigned employee.  The undersigned employee
will pay all taxes on interest so imputed.

     The balance of the note is payable as follows:

     (1) The first one hundred thousand dollars  ($100,000) of any bonus awarded
under the Bell  Sports  Bonus Plan to the  undersigned  by Payee  after the date
hereof shall be applied by Payee to reduce the balance hereof;

     (2) The entire principal balance hereof is due and payable upon the earlier
of the following:  (a) the termination,  for whatever reason, of the undersigned
as an employee of the Payee; (b) the dissolution or liquidation of the Payee; or
(c)  the  bonus  paid  in the  fiscal  year  of the  sixth  anniversary  of this
promissory note as reflected by the date at the top hereof.

     In the event that the note is not paid strictly in  accordance  with all of
the above terms, then and thereafter the principal balance will bear interest at
the maximum legal rate until paid in full.

     This  Note is  secured  by a  Collateral  Pledge  Agreement  of  even  date
herewith,  the terms of which are  incorporated  herein by reference.  This Note
shall for all purposes be governed by and construed in accordance  with the laws
of the State of California.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have caused this Promissory Note to be
executed as of the day and year first above written.


                                        /s/ Mary J. George
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mary George
#### Rita BARRETT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-73031

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 14, 2017

Rita Barrett, Pro Se

Sherra Wong, Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, Attorneys, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges'.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rita Barrett appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s summary judgment in her action challenging the disallowance of her request for an abatement of interest for the tax year 1976. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a). We review de novo. *Miller v. Comm’r,*310 F.3d 640, 642 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The Tax Court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of res judicata *274because Barrett raised the same claim regarding abatement of interest for the 1976 tax year in a prior tax court proceeding that was decided on the merits. *See Baker v. IRS (In re Baker),*74 F.3d 906, 910 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Under th[e] doctrine [of res judicata], a final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties from relit-igating issues that were or could have been raised in that action.”). Contrary to Barrett’s contentions, Barrett failed to identify any new evidence or fraudulent conduct that would preclude the application of res judicata.

We reject as meritless Barrett’s contention that her case was not adequately considered as a result of the assignment to a new judge.

Because we affirm on the basis of res judicata, we do not consider the merits of Barrett’s claims.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent' except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
D Sr4

I

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

SEP 30 2014

The Honorable Ruben Barrios, Chairperson

Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe

P.O. Box 8

Lemoore, California 93245

Dear Chairperson Barrios:

Pursuant to Executive Order 13175 and the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian

Tribes, I would like to invite the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe to engage in government-togovernment consultation on action EPA is considering to reclassifiy the San Joaquin Valley nonattainment

area from Moderate nonattainment to Serious nonattainment for two National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

The San Joaquin Valley is currently classified Moderate nonattainment for two PM2.5NAAQS established in

1997 and 2006. EPA is evaluating air quality and modeling analyses regarding the ability of the San Joaquin

Valley to attain the 1997 and the 2006 PM2.5NAAQS by the applicable attainment dates for each standard.

Consistent with these evaluations. EPA is also considering action to reclassify the San Joaquin Valley as

Serious nonattainment for the 1997 and 2006 PM25 NAAQS. These reclassification actions would establish

new attainment dates and outline new air quality planning requirements.

These reclassifications would also lower the applicable “major source” thresholds for the purposes ofthe

nonattainment new source review program and the Title V operating permit program from its current level of

100 tons per year (tpy) to 70 tpy, potentially subjecting more stationary sources to these requirements. The

reclassifications may also lower the de minimis threshold for the Clean Air Act’s General Conformity

requirement from 100 tpy to 70 tpy. Under the General Conformity requirement, Federal agencies bear the

responsibility of determining conformity of actions in nonattainment and maintenance areas that require

Federal permits, approvals, or funding.

To ensure that the interests and concerns ofthe Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe are considered, I

would like to invite you or your designated consultation representative to engage in government-togovernment consultation with EPA. To request further information, or to initiate consultation, please have

your staff contact Mr. Kerry Drake, Associate Director, Air Division. at (415) 947-4157 or by electronic mail

at drake.kerryepa.gov. If you desire government-to-government consultation with EPA, we respectfully

request that you notify us by October 27, 2014. Thank you and I look forward to receiving your input.

Sincerely,

bcborah Jordan/

Director, Air Division

cc: Janice Cuara, Tribal Administrator

P,i,ited On Rt’(v(lI’j f’acr
EX PARTE Thaddeus Raynard HOLLEY, Sr.

CR-16-0359

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1533 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1533

To extend the deferment of EIDL loans made in response to COVID-19 from 
                           1 year to 2 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2021

Ms. Salazar (for herself, Ms. Davids of Kansas, Mr. Meuser, Ms. Craig, 
and Mr. Diaz-Balart) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the deferment of EIDL loans made in response to COVID-19 from 
                           1 year to 2 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID Economic Injury Disaster Loan 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTEND EIDL DEFERMENT.

    With respect to any loan made under section 7(b)(2) of the Small 
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(2)) in response to COVID-19, the payment 
of principal and interest charges shall be suspended for the 2-year 
period beginning on the date on which such loan is or was made.
                                 <all>
```