Mojave Desert 

Air Quality Management District 

Final 

Staff Report 

Proposed Amendments to 

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings 

Adopted on 

April 23, 2012 

14306 PARK AVE, VICTORVILLE, CA 92392-2310 

PHONE: (760) 245-1661 

FAX: (760) 245-2699 
This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 TC-1 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012 

STAFF REPORT 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT ............................................................................................ 1 

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 1 

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................................. 2 

IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST ............................................................................ 3 

V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................................... 4 

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS............................................................................... 4 

1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations ..................................... 4 

a. Necessity..................................................................................................................... 4 

b. Authority..................................................................................................................... 4 

c. Clarity ......................................................................................................................... 4 

d. Consistency................................................................................................................. 4 

e. Non-duplication .......................................................................................................... 4 

f. Reference .................................................................................................................... 5 

g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing................................................................ 5 

2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals)....................................... 5

a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements...................................................... 5 

b. Public Notice and Comment ....................................................................................... 5 

c. Availability of Document ........................................................................................... 6 

d. Notice to Specified Entities ........................................................................................ 6 

e. Public Hearing ............................................................................................................ 6 

f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement................................................................... 6 

g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed............................................ 7 

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................ 7 

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 7 

1. General............................................................................................................................ 7 

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness....................................................................................... 8 

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA)....................................................................... 8 

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS..................................................... 9 

1. Potential Environmental Impacts.................................................................................... 9 

2. Mitigation of Impacts..................................................................................................... 9 

3. Alternative Methods of Compliance.............................................................................. 9 

F. PUBLIC REVIEW.............................................................................................................. 9 

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 9 

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................. 9 

B. EMISSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 10 

Table 1 .................................................................................................................................. 11 

C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS........................................................................................ 12 

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY..................................................................................... 13 

E. SIP HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 15 

1. SIP History.................................................................................................................... 15 

a. SIP in the San Bernardino County Portion of MDAQMD ....................................... 15 
TC-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

b. SIP in the Riverside County Portion of the MDAQMD........................................... 16 

2. SIP Analysis.................................................................................................................. 17 

Appendix A - Iterated Version.................................................................................................... A-1 

Appendix B - Public Notice Documents..................................................................................... B-1 

Appendix C - Public Comments and Responses......................................................................... C-1 

Appendix D - California Environmental Quality Act Documentation ....................................... D-1 

Appendix E - Bibliography..........................................................................................................E-1 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012 

STAFF REPORT 

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings 

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT 

A staff report serves several discrete purposes. Its primary purpose is to provide a summary and 

background material to the members of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 

Governing Board (Governing Board). This allows the members of the Governing Board to be 

fully informed before making any required decision. It also provides the documentation 

necessary for the Governing Board to make any findings, which are required by law to be made 

prior to the approval or adoption of a document. In addition, a staff report ensures that the 

correct procedures and proper documentation for approval or adoption of a document have been 

performed. Finally, the staff report provides evidence for defense against legal challenges 

regarding the propriety of the approval or adoption of the document. 

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

The California Clean Air Act (CCAA; Health & Safety (H&S) Code §§ 39000 et seq.) requires 

that each local air district which has been designated nonattainment for certain pollutants to 

prepare a plan designed to achieve and maintain state air quality standards at the earliest 

practicable date (Health & Safety Code §§40910 et seq.). Such plans must include, among other 

items, the adoption of measures designed to require the use of Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) for all existing stationary sources of air pollution and Best Available 

Retrofit Technology (BARCT) for certain existing large sources of air pollution H&S Code 

§40918(a)(3). For purposes of the CCAA the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District 

(District) has been designated nonattainment for both ozone and PM10. 

The Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA; 42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.) requires areas designated 

nonattainment for ozone and classified moderate and above to adopt and maintain RACT rules to 

control the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) from 

major stationary sources of air pollution. For purposes of the FCAA, portions of the District have 

been designated nonattainment for ozone and classified Severe-17 and the entire District has 

been classified nonattianment for PM10. 

From time to time the California Air Resources Board (CARB) publishes guidance documents to 

assist local air districts in adopting appropriate rules and regulations to meet the above 

requirements. These guidance documents include, but are not limited to, Suggested Control 

Measures (SCMs) for particular source categories. Historically these SCMs have been used as a 

minimum standard for air district regulations to meet the State and Federal nonattainment area 

requirements. The SCM for Architectural Coatings was originally adopted by CARB in 1977 

and was revised in 1985, 1989 and 2000. In response to the adoption and revisions of the SCM 

for Architectural Coatings the District adopted Rule 1113 on February 20, 1979 and amended it 

on June 4, 1984, November 2, 1992, and February 24, 2003. CARB, in cooperation with the 

local air districts, again revised the SCM for Architectural Coatings and adopted it on October 
1113-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

26, 2007. The revised SCM for Architectural Coatings reflects both the advances in coatings 

technology since the last version and the need for further emissions reductions necessary to attain 

the State and Federal ambient air quality standards in many local air districts. Specifically, the 

revised SCM specifies volatile organic compound (VOC) limits for 42 coating categories. The 

proposed VOC limits for 19 of the 42 categories are lower than the limits specified in the 2000 

SCM for Architectural Coatings. 

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 have been developed to conform the emissions 

limitations and other requirements of the rule to those set forth in the SCM for Architectural 

Coatings as adopted by CARB on October 26, 2007. The proposed amendments mainly lower 

the VOC content limits for a number of coatings categories resulting in an estimated 15.2 tons 

per day reduction in VOC emissions state-wide which represents a 28 percent overall emissions 

reduction. The amendments also contain revised definitions for a variety of coating types either 

for clarification or to limit the types of products that qualify for inclusion in a category. Some 

definitions were deleted because the categories have been combined with other categories, were 

replaced by new categories or were unnecessary. Additionally, amendments clarify situations 

where the most restrictive VOC limit is not applicable and update reporting requirements to 

include sales data. Other amendments include revisions to the section that describes how to 

determine VOC content, container labeling requirements, a “sell-through” provision, and an 

early compliance provision. Lastly, effective dates for compliance were separated into Table 1 

and Table 2. Table 2 contains the VOC content limits for architectural coatings that are 

proposed to be eliminated effective January 1, 2013. Table 1 contains the VOC content limits 

for architectural coatings effective 2/24/2003 and the proposed updated limits effective 1/1/2013. 

The hearing to consider the amendment of Rule 1113 was originally noticed for February 27, 

2012. This hearing was continued to the March 26, 2012 meeting to address CARB/public 

comments. The March 26, 2012 meeting was cancelled and all items deferred to the next 

regularly scheduled meeting of April 23, 2012. 

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 

Staff recommends that the Governing Board of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management 

District adopt the proposed amendments to Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings and approve the 

appropriate CEQA documentation. This action is necessary to conform the rule to the SCM for 

Architectural Coatings as adopted by CARB on October 26, 2007. 

The Governing Board of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District amended Rule 

1113 – Architectural Coatings on April 23, 2012. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-3

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012 

IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST 

The findings and analysis as indicated below are required for the procedurally correct 

amendments to Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings. Each item is discussed, if applicable, in 

Section V. Copies of related documents are included in the appropriate appendices. 

FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR 

RULES & REGULATIONS:

 X Necessity 

 X Authority 

 X Clarity 

 X Consistency 

 X Nonduplication 

 X Reference 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

 X Public Hearing 

REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE 

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 

SUBMISSION (SIP): 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

 X Availability of Document 

 X Notice to Specified Entities (State, Air 

Districts, USEPA, Other States) 

 X Public Hearing 

 X Legal Authority to adopt and implement the 

document. 

 X Applicable State laws and regulations were 

followed. 

ELEMENTS OF A FEDERAL 

SUBMISSION:

N/A Elements as set forth in applicable Federal 

law or regulations. 

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

ACT REQUIREMENTS (CEQA):

N/A Ministerial Action 

 X Exemption 

N/A Negative Declaration 

N/A Environmental Impact Report 

 X Appropriate findings, if necessary. 

 X Public Notice & Comment 

SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL 

ANALYSIS (RULES & REGULATIONS ONLY):

 X Environmental impacts of compliance. 

 X Mitigation of impacts. 

 X Alternative methods of compliance. 

OTHER: 

 X Written analysis of existing air pollution 

control requirements 

 X Economic Analysis 

X Public Review
1113-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS 

A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS 

This section discusses the state of California statutory requirements that apply to the 

proposed amendments to Rule 1113. These are actions that need to be performed and/or 

information that must be provided in order to amend the rule in a procedurally correct 

manner. 

1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations: 

Before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or regulation, the Governing 

Board is required to make findings of necessity, authority, clarity, consistency, 

non-duplication, and reference based upon relevant information presented at the 

hearing. The information below is provided to assist the Governing Board in 

making these findings. 

a. Necessity: 

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 are necessary to conform 

the rule to the CARB SCM for Architectural Coatings, to comply 

with the CCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to attain the 

state air quality standards as expeditiously as possible and to 

comply with the FCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to 

impose RACT for all existing major sources of air pollution. 

b. Authority: 

The District has the authority pursuant to California H&S Code 

§40702 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations. 

c. Clarity: 

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 are clear in that they are 

written so that the persons subject to the rule can easily understand 

the meaning. 

d. Consistency: 

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 are in harmony with, and 

not in conflict with or contradictory to any State law or regulation, 

Federal law or regulation, or court decisions. 

e. Non-duplication: 

The proposed amendments to not impose the same requirements as 

any existing State or Federal law or regulation because the SCM 

for Architectural Coatings is merely a guidance document which 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-5

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

provides suggested methods for complying with CCAA 

requirements to attain the state ambient air quality standards at the 

earliest practicable date. When adopted and implemented by local 

air districts the SCM for Architectural Coatings becomes a defacto RACT standard. However, the provisions of the SCM for 

Architectural Coatings cannot be implemented without local rule 

adoption. 

f. Reference: 

The District has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §40702 to 

adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations. 

g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing: 

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed amendments to Rule 

1113 was published January 27, 2012 for the February 27, 2012 

meeting. This hearing was continued to the March 26, 2012 meeting 

to address CARB/public comments. The March 26, 2012 meeting 

was cancelled and all items deferred the next regularly scheduled 

meeting of April 23, 2012. See Appendix “B” for a copy of the 

public notice. See Appendix “C” for copies of comments, if any, and 

District responses. 

2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals). 

Submittals to USEPA are required to include various elements depending upon 

the type of document submitted and the underlying federal law that requires the 

submittal. The information below indicates which elements are required for the 

proposed of Rule 1113 and how they were satisfied. 

a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements: 

The FCAA requires areas designated non-attainment and classified 

moderate and above to implement RACT for sources subject to 

CTG and ACT documents issued by USEPA for major sources of 

VOCs and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) which are ozone precursors. 

The adoption of the amended SCM for Architectural Coatings and 

its subsequent adoption and enforcement by other air districts 

makes the coatings formulations required “reasonably available”. 

Thus the SCM for Architectural Coatings has become a de-facto 

RACT standard for this source category. 

b. Public Notice and Comment: 

Notice for the public hearing for the proposed amendments to Rule 

1113 was published January 27, 2012 for the February 27, 2012 
1113-6 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

meeting. This hearing was continued to the March 26, 2012 meeting 

to address CARB/public comments. The March 26, 2012 meeting 

was cancelled and all items deferred the next regularly scheduled 

meeting of April 23, 2012. See Appendix “B” for a copy of the 

public notice. See Appendix “C” for copies of comments, if any, 

and District responses. 

c. Availability of Document: 

Copies of the proposed amendments to Rule 1113 and the 

accompanying draft staff report was made available to the public 

on January 13, 2012. Industry was encouraged to review the 

proposed amendments on August 11, 2011 when a letter stating 

intent of the proposed changes was mailed. Additionally, in 2005 

the CARB staff initiated a number of activities to develop the 

proposed SCM. These activities included: conducting a survey of 

architectural coatings, meeting with district and USEPA Region IX 

representatives; hosting public workshops; meeting with industry 

trade groups and individual manufacturers; meeting with essential 

public services agencies; evaluating the South Coast AQMD’s 

Rule 1113 and the USEPA’s National Architectural Coatings Rule; 

conducting technology assessments of all the coating categories; 

evaluating durability and performance research for several coating 

categories; preparing an environmental impact analysis; and 

conducting an economic impacts survey and preparing an 

economic analysis. 

d. Notice to Specified Entities: 

Copies of the proposed amendments to Rule 1113 and the 

accompanying draft staff report were sent to all affected agencies. 

The proposed rule amendments were sent to CARB and USEPA on 

or before January 13, 2012. 

e. Public Hearing: 

A public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to Rule 

1113 has been set for February 27, 2012. This hearing was 

continued to the March 26, 2012 meeting to address CARB/public 

comments. The March 26, 2012 meeting was cancelled and all items 

deferred the next regularly scheduled meeting of April 23, 2012. 

f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement: 

The District has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §40702 to 

adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations and to do such acts as 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-7

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

may be necessary or proper to execute the duties imposed upon the 

District. 

g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Followed: 

Public notice and hearing procedures pursuant to H&S Code 

§§40725-40728 have been followed. See Section (V)(A)(1) above 

for compliance with state findings required pursuant to H&S Code 

§40727. See Section (V)(B) below for compliance with the 

required analysis of existing requirements pursuant to H&S Code 

§40727.2. See Section (V)(C) for compliance with economic 

analysis requirements pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6. See 

Section (V)(D) below for compliance with provisions of the 

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 

B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS 

H & S Code §40727.2 requires air districts to prepare a written analysis of all existing 

federal air pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type 

as the rule proposed for modification by the district. The USEPA has promulgated a 

standard for VOC emissions from architectural coatings (40 CFR 52, 9/11/98 63 FR 

48877). While this Federal regulation was in all probability RACT at the time it was 

adopted there have been significant advances in coatings technology since 1998. These 

advances are reflected in the SCM for Architectural Coatings as adopted by CARB on 

October 26, 2007. The SCM for Architectural Coatings has been adopted by 6 of the local 

air districts in California and will therefore be considered RACT by USEPA. Please see 

Table 1 in section (VI)(B) below for a comparison of the requirements between the Federal 

regulation, current South Coast Air Quality Management District limits, current Rule 1113, 

and the proposed amended Rule 1113. 

C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 

1. General 

As a part of the adoption process for the SCM for Architectural Coatings staff of 

CARB prepared an extensive economic analysis of the potential economic impacts 

and cost effectiveness of the proposed SCM. This analysis was contained in the 

Staff Report for the Proposed Suggested Control Measure for Architectural 

Coatings (CARB Staff Report).1

The District fully expects that the economic impacts detailed in the CARB staff 

report will be mitigated within the district due to several factors. First, the high 

population density areas of the District are physically located adjacent to the 

South Coast Air Quality Management. The SCAQMD has for several years 

required equivalent, and in some cases more stringent, VOC content limits on 

 

1

 Staff Report for Proposed Amendments to the Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (9/2007) 
1113-8 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

architectural coatings than those in the SCM for Architectural Coatings. In fact, 

many of the limits contained in the SCM for Architectural Coatings are based 

upon limits in effect in the SCAQMD prior to the 2007 adoption of the SCM. The 

District is informed that the distributors within the SCAQMD supply a majority of 

the retail paint outlets located within the district. The District is also informed that 

many distributors supply SCAQMD compliant paint to retail outlets located 

within the district. Thus, there should be little, if any, change in retail prices 

within the District for common coating types. 

2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness 

Pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6, incremental cost effectiveness calculations are 

required for rules and regulations which are adopted or amended to meet the 

California Clean Air Act requirements for Best Available Retrofit Control 

Technology (BARCT) or “all feasible measures” to control emissions of VOC, 

NOX or oxides of sulfur (SOX). 

The CARB Staff report estimated the overall average cost effectiveness of the 

SCM for Architectural Coatings to be $1.12 per pound of VOC reduced. The 

district concurs with this estimate. For a complete analysis of incremental cost 

effectiveness please see Section (G)(2) – Economic Impacts of the CARB Staff 

Report. 

D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA) 

1. Through the process described below the appropriate CEQA process for 

the proposed amendments to Rule 1113 was determined. 

a. The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 meet the CEQA 

definition of “project”. They are not “ministerial” actions. 

b. The proposed amendment of Rule 1113 is exempt from 

CEQA review because it will not create any adverse 

impacts on the environment. The proposed requirements in 

the proposed amendments to Rule 1113 are more stringent 

than the currently existing requirements (see more detailed 

discussion in Rule Summary §(D)) in that: rule 

applicability is expanded to include current CTG source 

categories; definitions are updated to make the rule more 

comprehensive, reflect the current applicability of the rule, 

and provide additional clarity; VOC limits for various 

categories of coatings and solvent coating operations have 

been included; Work practice requirements have been

added; and, the monitoring and recordkeeping, and test 

method sections have been strengthened. Therefore, no 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-9

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

adverse environmental effects are foreseen from the

proposed amendments. Therefore, a Class 8 categorical 

exemption (14 Cal. Code Reg. §15308) applies. Copies of 

the documents relating to CEQA can be found in Appendix 

“D”. 

E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 

1. Potential Environmental Impacts 

The potential environmental impacts of the SCM for Architectural Coatings on a 

statewide level were addressed by CARB in its Final Program Environmental 

Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (June 

2000). The analysis concluded that implementing the 2000 SCM would have no 

significant impacts, but would have a net air quality benefit. CARB believes that 

the District can use the Technical Support Document and the EIR from the 2000 

SCM to support their environmental impact analyses in adopting 1113 – 

Architectural Coatings based on the 2007 SCM. 

2. Mitigation of Impacts 

This issue was also addressed by CARB in its Final Program Environmental 

Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (June 

2000). 

3. Alternative Methods of Compliance 

This issue was also addressed by CARB in its Final Program Environmental 

Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (June 

2000). 

F. PUBLIC REVIEW 

See Staff Report Subsections (V)(A)(1)(g) and (2)(b), as well as, Appendix “B”. 

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION 

A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION 

Rule 1113 currently applies to all architectural coatings supplied, sold, offered for sale, 

manufactured, or used within the District. The proposed amendments add applicability to 

coatings blended or repackaged within the District. The proposed amendments clarify 

that coatings supplied, sold, offered for sale or manufactured for use outside the District, 

for shipment to other manufacturers or for reformulation and repackaging are exempt 

from the rule as are aerosol coating products which are covered by a CARB consumer 
1113-10 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

product regulation. Small batches of coating sold in containers of one (1) liter or less are 

also exempt with the exception of reporting requirements. 

Several facilities in the MDAQMD have operations potentially affected by the proposed 

amendments to Rule 1113. There are approximately 85 architectural coating operations 

within the District which are served by various main suppliers. 

B. EMISSIONS 

The amendments to Rule 1113 do not cause the release of additional air contaminants, or 

create any adverse environmental impacts because the amended rule proposes a more 

stringent applicability, as well as, more stringent VOC limits for all coating categories 

than the existing rule. Categories of architectural coatings have been added in some 

places, combined in others and removed in others to reflect changes in coating 

technology. Table 1 shows the differences between the coating limits contained in the 

Federal regulation (40 CFR 59), current SCAQMD limits; current Rule 1113 and the 

proposed amended Rule 1113. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-11

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Table 1 

Comparison of Coating Limits 

Between Federal Regulation, Current Rule and Proposed Amendments 

Coating Category Limits from 40 

CFR 59

SCAQMD 

Rule Limits

Current 

MD Rule Limits

Proposed 

Limits

Primary Coatings

Flat Coatings 50 100 50

Nonflat Coatings 50 150 100

Nonflat-High Gloss Coatings 250 150

Specialty Coatings

Aluminum Roof Coatings 100 n/a 400

Basement Specialty Coatings n/a 400

Bituminous Roof Coatings 500 50a 300 50

Bituminous Roof Primers 500b 350 350 350

Bond Breakers 600 350 350 350

Concrete Curing Compounds 350 100/350c 350 350

Concrete/Masonary Sealers 700 n/a 100

Driveway Sealers 100 n/a 50

Dry Fog Coatings 400 150 400 150

Faux Finishing Coatings 700 350 350 350

Fire Resistive Coatings 850 350 350 350

Floor Coatings 400 50 250 100

Form-Release Compounds 450 250 250 250

Graphic Arts Coatings (Sign Paints) 500 500 500 500

High Temperature Coatings 650/420d 420 420 420

Industrial Maintenance Coatings e 100 250 250

Low Solids Coatings 120 120f 120f

Magnesite Cement Coatings 600 450 450 450

Mastic Texture Coatings 300 300 300 100

Metallic Pigmented Coatings 500 500 500 500

Multi-Color Coatings 580 250 250 250

Pre-Treatment Wash Primers 780 420 420 420

Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 350/400g 100 200 100

Reactive Penetrating Sealers 350 n/a 350

Recycled Coatings 250 250 250

Roof Coatings 250 50 250 50

Rust Preventative Coatings 400 100 400 250

Shellacs:

 Clear 730 730 730 730

 Opaque 550 550 550 550

Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 100 350 100

Stains 550 100 250 250

Stone Consolidants 450 n/a 450

Swimming Pool Coatings 600 340 340 340

Traffic Marking Coatings 150 100 150 100

Tub and Tile Refinish Coatings n/a 420

Waterproofing Membranes 100 n/a 250

Wood Coatings n/a 275

Wood Preservatives 550/350/120/450h 350 350 350

Zinc-Rich Primers 100i n/a 340

a: SCAQMD Coating Category is Roof Coatings

b: 40 CFR 59 treats all Bituminous Roof Coatings as a single category

c: SCAQMD separates Concrete-Curing Compounds into two categories, 

Concrete Curing Compounds at 100 and Concrete-Curing Compounds for Roadways and Bridges at 350

d: 40 CFR 59 separates High Temperature Coatings into two categories, High Temperature at 650 and Heat Reactive Coatings at 420

e: 40 CFR 59 separates Industrial maintenance coatings into the following subcategories and limits:

Anti-Graffiti 600

Chalkboard Resurfacers 450

Extreme High Durability 800

Heat Reactive 420

Impact Immersion 780

Nonferrous Ornamental Metal 

Lacquers and Surface Protection 870

Nuclear 450

Repair and Maintenance 

 Thermoplastic 650

Thermoplastic Rubber and Mastics 550

f: Limit expressed as VOC Actual 

g: 40 CFR 59 separates Primers, Sealers and Undercoaters into two categories: Primers and Undercoaters at 350 and Sealers at 400

h: 40 CFR 59 seperates Wood Preservatives into the following subcategories and limits: 

Below Ground Wood Preservatives 550

Clear and Semitransparent 550

Opaque 350

Low Solids 120

Zone Marking Coatings 450

i: Labeled as Zinc Rich IM Primers
1113-12 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

VOC emissions from the use of architectural coatings in California are estimated 

to be about 118 tons per day (tpd) in 2004. This includes 95 tpd from coatings, 

and about 23 tpd from associated cleanup solvents, thinners, and additives. 

Total emissions from architectural coatings and associated materials represent 

almost 10 percent of the VOC emissions from stationary and area sources, and 

almost five (5) percent of the total VOC emissions statewide. The SCM is expected to 

achieve 15.2 tpd in VOC emission reductions outside of the South Coast AQMD. This 

represents a 28 percent overall emission reduction.

This estimate assumes that coatings used within the District comply with current Rule 

1113 but are not already in compliance with the new proposed limits. This assumption 

may not be entirely valid across all coating categories. This is due to the physical 

proximity of the District to SCAQMD. SCAQMD has for several years required more 

stringent VOC limits than those required either Federally or elsewhere in California. 

Because distributors within the SCAQMD supply a majority of the retail plaint outlets 

located within the District, the District suspects that at least a portion of the paint sold 

within the District, especially in certain high volume sales categories, could be compliant 

with current SCAQMD rules. 

C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 

The proposed amendments to Rule 1113 do not impose any particular control 

requirements on paint users that are not already in place. Users will continue to be 

required to thin paint properly, apply it according to the manufacturer’s directions and 

engage in VOC limiting painting practices such as covering paint cans when not actively 

painting. 

The proposed amendments primarily impact paint formulation. Since the limits similar to 

the proposed VOC limits have been in effect in SCAQMD for several years and due to 

the physical proximity of the District to SCAQMD, the District suspects that paint 

formulations meeting the proposed VOC limits are already available in use throughout 

the District. In addition, many of the proposed VOC limits reflect a shift in paint 

formulation from primarily solvent based coatings to waterborne coatings. This is 

especially true in the high volume sales categories. Please refer to the last column in 

Table 1 of the staff report for proposed VOC content limits of particular coating types. 

In addition to impacting formulation, the proposed amendments also clarify that if a 

coating meets criteria of a specialty coating category then it is not required to meet the 

VOC limits for Flat, NonFlat, or Nonflat-High Gloss Coatings, but is required to meet the 

VOC limit for the applicable specialty Coating listed in Table 1 or Table 2 of Rule. 

Also, the Averaging Compliance Option, previously allowing manufacturers to average 

designated Coatings such that their actual cumulative emissions from the averaged 

Coatings are less than or equal to the cumulative emissions that would have been allowed 

under those limits over a compliance period not to exceed one year has been removed. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-13

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Please see Section C of the rule (see Appendix “A”) for control requirements. Control 

requirements are in the form of VOC Content Limits, Most Restrictive VOC Limits, 

Specialty Coating Categories, Eliminated Categories, Sell-Through of Coatings, Painting 

Practices, Thinning, Rust Preventative Coating Requirements, Coatings Not Listed, 

removal of Averaging Compliance Option and an Early Compliance Provision. 

D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY 

This section gives a brief overview of the amendments to Rule 1113. The iterated rule 

version is contained in Appendix “A” of this staff report. 

Proposed amendments to Rule 1113 were designed to implement CARB SCM for 

Architectural Coatings.. 

Formating changes have been made throughout the rule to correct alphabetization, 

capitalization, punctuation and reference citations. These changes are not specifically 

notated below. 

Section (A)(2) has been amended to extend applicability to any person who blends or 

repackages any architectural coating within the District. Section (A)(3)(a) has been 

amended to be inclusive of architectural coatings that are supplied and offered for sale. 

Section (A)(3)(c) has been amended to exclude Section (E).

Section (B) definitions are updated. Definitions have been included to make the rule 

more comprehensive, reflect the current applicability of the rule, and provide additional 

clarity. 

The following definitions have been added: Aluminum Roof, Basement Specialty 

Coating, Concrete/Masonry Sealer, Driveway Sealer, Manufacturer’s Maximum 

Thinning Recommendation, Medium Density Fiberboard, Particleboard, Pearlescent, 

Plywood, Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater, Reactive Penetrating Sealer, Secondary 

Industrial Materials, Semitransparent Coating, Stone Consolidant, Tub and Tile Refinish 

Coating, Veneer, Virgin Materials, Waterproofing Membrane, Wood Coatings, Wood 

Substrate, and Zinc-Rich Primer. 

The following definitions have been deleted or combined with other categories: Bay 

Area Air Quality Management District, Primer, Sealer, Secondary Coating (Rework), 

South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Undercoater. 

 The following definitions have been left in the rule but are proposed to be eliminated as 

of 01/01/2013: Antenna Coating, Antifouling Coating, Clear Brushing Lacquer, Clear 

Wood Coating, Fire-Retardant Coating, Flow Coating, Lacquer, Quick Dry Enamel, 

Quick-Dry Pimer, Sealer, and Undercoater, Sanding Sealer, Swimming Pool Repair and 

Maintenance Coating, Temperature Indicator Safety Coating, Varnish, Waterproofing 

Sealer, and Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer. 

The following definitions have been updated: Exempt Compound, Faux Finishing 

Coating, Fire-Resistive Coating, Metallic Pigmented Coating, Pretreatment Wash Primer, 
1113-14 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Recycled Coating, Rust Preventative Coating, Speciality Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater, 

Swimming Pool Coating, and VOC Content. 

Section (C), Requirements, have been modified as follows: 

Requirement for eliminated Lacquer category and Averaging Compliance Option 

removed. Early Compliance provision was moved to Section (C)(9) for clarity. 

(C)(1)(a) Verbiage added to coincide with SCM and added reference to Table 2. 

(C)(1)(a)(i) “sale” has been changed to “use” for clarity. 

(C)(1)(a)(ii) was modified to include “for use”. 

 (C)(2)(a) Added a Table to clarify which categories the Most Restrictive VOC Limit 

does not apply and to clarify limits both before and after 01/01/2013 effective date. 

(C)(3) Specialty Coating Categories section added. 

(C)(4) Eliminated Categories section added. 

(C)(5) Sell-Through of Coatings past dates changed to January 1, 2013 effective date and 

additional language added to clarify that Coating must have complied with the standards 

in effect at the time the Coating was manufactured.

(C)(5)(c) Section deleted as averaging program is no longer in effect. 

(C)(8)(a) Effective date updated. 

(C)(7)(a) Updated reference to include Table 2. 

(C)(9)(a) Updated to include “Nonflat – High Gloss Coating”. 

(C)(10)(a) Early Compliance Provision added. 

Section (D), Container Labeling Requirements, has been updated for consistency with 

additional language from SCM and from San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 

Control District. Labeling requirement for those categories, Clear Brushing Lacquers and 

Quick Dry Enamels, which are proposed to be eliminated 01/01/2013 has been updated 

with language to reflect that effective 01/01/2103 category will be eliminated. For 

categories without prior labeling requirements – Faux Finishing Coatings, Reactive 

Penetrating Sealers, Stone Consolidants, Wood Coatings, and Zinc Rich Primers, labeling 

requirements have been added. Additionally, the labeling requirements for Specialty 

Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters has been updated to specify that this category 

includes coatings formulated to seal excessively chalky surfaces until January 1, 2013. 

Section (E), Reporting Requirements, has been modified to match SCM requirements. 

Additional requirements concerning TBAc has been added from 40 CFR51.100(s)(5) and 

the MDAQMD tBAc Policy. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-15

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Section (F), Administrative Requirements, has been updated to include a section on 

Severability. 

(G)(1)(a) has been updated to include reference to Table 2 as well as Table 1, and to 

include language from SCM. Additionally, VOC Content renamed to VOC Regulatory 

and VOC Contentls renamed to VOC Actual. 

Additionally, Section (G)(5), Test Methods, has been amended to update the testing 

methods and protocols to the most recent version in accordance with the SCM. Testing 

methods for the Aluminum Roof Coatings, Faux Finishing Coating, Hydrostatic Pressure 

for Basement Specialty Coatings, Mold and Mildew Growth for Basement Specialty 

Coatings, Pre-Treatment Wash Primer, Reactive Penetrating Sealer, Reactive 

Penetrating Sealer Water Repellency, Reactive Penetrating Sealer Water Vapor 

Transmission, Stone Consolidants, Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Abrasion Resistance, 

Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Adhesion, Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Hardness, Tub 

and Tile Refinish Coating Water Resistance, and Waterproofing Membrane were added 

and the test method for Drying Times was deleted. 

Table 1 containing VOC Content Limits for Architectural Coatings dated effective 

February 24, 3003, effective May 24, 2003 and effective January 1, 2004 was replaced by 

Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1 – VOC Content Limits for Architectural Coatings reflects 

current limits and proposed limits as of 01/01/2013. Table 2 - VOC Content Limits for 

Architectural Coatings, effective January 1, 2013 the coating categories in Table 2 are 

eliminated and will be subject to the VOC limit of the applicable category in Table 1, 

expect as provided in Section (C)(2), (C)(3), and (C)(5). 

Appendix A: Averaging Provision was deleted. 

E. SIP HISTORY 

1. SIP History 

a. SIP in the San Bernardino County Portion of MDAQMD 

On February 20, 1979 the San Bernardino County APCD (SBCAPCD), 

the predecessor agency to the MDAQMD, adopted Rule 1113. This rule 

was effective in what is now called the San Bernardino County portion of 

the Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB). The MDAB was formerly known 

as the Southeast Desert Air Basin (SEDAB). In 1997 the SEDAB was 

split into the MDAB and the Salton Sea Air Basin. Descriptions of these 

air basins can be found in 17 Cal. Code. Regs. §§60109 and 60144. 

The 1979 version of Rule 1113 was submitted as a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) by CARB on May 23, 1979 and approved by 

USEPA on June 8, 1982 at 47 FR 20513 (Codified at 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(51)(xii)(B)). The SBCAPCD amended Rule 1113 on June 4, 

1984 and again on November 2, 1992. The 1992 amendment was 
1113-16 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

submitted as a SIP revision by CARB for what is now called the San 

Bernardino County Portion of MDAB on January 11, 1993. The District 

is unaware of any action taken by USEPA on the 1993 submission. 

On July 1, 1993 the MDAQMD was formed pursuant to statute. Pursuant 

to statute it also retained all the rules and regulations of the SBCAPCD 

until such time as the Governing Board of the MDAQMD wished to 

adopt, amend or rescind such rules. The MDAQMD Governing Board, at 

its very first meeting, reaffirmed all the rules and regulations of the 

SBCAPCD. Since SIP revisions in California are adopted by USEPA as 

effective in areas which happen to be defined by both air basin 

designations and the jurisdictional boundaries of local air districts within 

those air basins, the MDAQMD “inherited” the SBCAPCD SIP which 

was in effect for what is now called the San Bernardino County Portion of 

MDAB. The MDQMD amended the rule on 2/24/2003 to conform the 

rule to the SCM for Architectural Coatings as adopted by CARB on June 

22, 2000. The 2/24/2003 version of Rule 1113 was submitted 4/01/2003 

and was given limited approval/disapproval in the SIP (69 FR 34) on 

1/2/2004. The provisions for disapproval have been addressed in the 

current proposed amendment with the removal of the averaging provision. 

Additionally, suggestions for rule improvement of the 2/24/2003 rule were 

corrected including referenced Rule 442, which was adopted 2/27/2006, 

and was approved into the SIP on 9/17/2007 (72 FR 52791) and all listed 

typographical errors have been addressed. 

b. SIP in the Riverside County (Blythe/Palo Verde Balley) Portion of 

the MDAQMD 

One of the provisions of the legislations which created the MDAQMD 

allowed areas contiguous to the MDAQMD boundaries and within the 

same air basin to leave their current air district and become a part of the 

MDAQMD. On July 1, 1994 the area commonly known as the Palo 

Verde Valley in Riverside County, including the City of Blythe, left 

SCAQMD and joined the MDAQMD. Since USEPA adopts SIP 

revisions in California as effective within the jurisdictional boundaries of 

local air districts, when the local boundaries change the SIP as approved 

by USEPA for that area up to the date of the change remains as the SIP in 

that particular area. Upon annexation of the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley the 

MDAQMD acquired the SIP prior to July 1, 1994 that was effective in the 

Blythe/Palo Verde Valley. Therefore, the SIP history for the Blythe/Palo 

Verde Valley Portion of the MDAQMD is based upon the rules adopted 

and approved for that portion of Riverside County by SCAQMD. 

Rule 1113 for SCAQMD as effective in the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley was 

originally adopted on September 2, 1997. USEPA made a variety of SIP 

revision approvals prior to 1985. CARB submitted a version of 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-17

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

SCAQMD Rule 1113 on July 13, 1978. The District presumes this 

submission was approved because it was codified at 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(45)(ii)(A). The next submission was made on November 3, 

1980 and was approved on September 28, 1981 at 46 FR 47451 (Codified 

at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(96)(i)(A)). Another submission was made by CARB 

on May 28, 1981 and approved by USEPA on July 6, 1982 at 47 FR 

29231 (Codified at 40 CFR 52.220(c)(92)(v)(B)(vi)(A)). CARB 

submitted another version of Rule 1113 on October 27, 1983 which was 

approved on October 13, 1984 at 49 FR 39057 (Codified at 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(148)(vi)(B)). A submission was made on July 10, 1984 which 

was approved on January 24, 1985 at 54 FR 3339 (Codified at 40 CFR 

52.220(c)(155)(iv)(A)). 

SCAQMD promulgated two (2) amendments to Rule 1113 effective in the 

Blythe/Palo Verde Valley in 1985. One of these amendments was 

submitted by CARB on November 12, 1985. This amendments was 

disapproved by USEPA on February 2, 1989 at 54 FR 5236 (Codified at 

40 CFR 52.229(b)(2)(iii)) and the prior SIP approved version submitted 

on July 10, 1984 was retained. After this disapproval CARB made several 

submissions of amended SCAQMD rules (March 23, 1988; April 5, 1991, 

and May 13, 1991) prior to the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley joining the 

MDAQMD in July of 1994. To the knowledge of the District USEPA did 

not take any actions on these submissions prior to July 1, 1994. The 

MDQMD amended the rule on 2/24/2003 to conform the rule to the SCM 

for Architectural Coatings as adopted by CARB on June 22, 2000. The 

2/24/2003 version of Rule 1113 was submitted 4/01/2003 and was given 

limited approval/disapproval in the SIP (69 FR 34) on 1/2/2004. The 

provisions for disapproval have been addressed in the current proposed 

amendment with the removal of the averaging provision. Additionally, 

suggestions for rule improvement of the 2/24/2003 rule were corrected 

including referenced Rule 442, which was adopted 2/27/2006, and was 

approved into the SIP on 9/17/2007 (72 FR 52791) and all listed 

typographical errors have been addressed. 

2. SIP Analysis 

The District will request CARB to submit the proposed amendments to Rule 

1113 to replace the SIP versions in effect in the San Bernardino County portion 

of the MDAB and the Blythe/Palo Verde Valley portion of Riverside County. 

This submission is necessary because the adoption of the amended SCM for 

Architectural Coatings and its subsequent adoption and enforcement by other air 

district makes the coatings formulations required “reasonably available”. Thus 

the SCM for Architectural Coatings has become a de-facto RACT standard for 

this source category. 

Since there is a previously existing SIP rule for this category the District will 

request that it be superseded. In order to replace existing SIP rules the District is 
1113-18 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

required to show that the proposed amendments are not less stringent than the 

provisions currently in the SIP. The proposed amendment of Rule 1113 is more 

stringent than the provisions currently in the SIP because rule applicability is 

expanded in accordance with the SCM; definitions are updated to make the rule 

more comprehensive, reflect the current applicability of the rule, and provide 

additional clarity; VOC limits for various categories of coatings and solvent 

coating operations have been modified to be more stringent in accordance with 

the SCM; the averaging compliance option has been deleted; labeling 

requirements have been added; the monitoring and recordkeeping, and test 

method sections have been clarified and strengthened; and a severability provision 

has been added. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 A-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Appendix “A” 

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings Iterated Version 

The iterated version is provided so that the changes to an existing rule may be easily found. The 

manner of differentiating text is as follows: 

1. Underlined text identifies new or revised language. 

2. Lined out text identifies language which is being deleted. 

3. Normal text identifies the current language of the rule which will remain unchanged by 

the adoption of the proposed amendments. 

4. [Bracketed italicized text] is explanatory material that is not part of the proposed 

language. It is removed once the proposed amendments are adopted. 
A-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

 Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

This page intentionally left blank. 
(Adopted: 02/20/79; Amended: 06/04/84; Amended: 11/02/92; 

Amended: 02/24/03; Amended: 00/00/00) 

MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-1

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

RULE 1113 

 Architectural Coatings 

(A) General

(1) Purpose: The purpose of this rRule is to limit the quantity of Vvolatile Oorganic 

Ccompounds (VOC) in Aarchitectural Ccoatings. 

 [Capitalize abbreviated and defined words]

(2) Applicability: Except as provided in subsection (A)(1)(3), this rule is applicable 

to any person who supplies, sells, offers for sale, or manufactures, blends or 

repackages any Aarchitectural Ccoating for use within the Mojave Desert Air 

Quality Management District as well as any person who applies or Ssolicits the 

application of any Aarchitectural Ccoating within the District. 

 [Correct citation, additional verbiage added from SCM, capitalize defined words]

(3) This rule does not apply to: 

(a) Any Aarchitectural Ccoating that is supplied, sold, offered for sale, or 

manufactured for use outside of the District or for shipment to other 

manufacturers for reformulation or repackaging.

(b) Any Aaerosol Ccoating Pproduct.

(c) With the exception of Section (E), Aany Aarchitectural Ccoating that is 

sold in a container with a volume of one (1) liter (1.057 quart) or less. 

[Additional verbiage added from SCM, capitalize defined words]

(B) Definitions

For the purposes of this rule, the following definitions shall apply: 

(1) “Adhesive”- Any chemical substance that is applied for the purpose of 

bonding two surfaces together other than by mechanical means.

(2) “Aerosol Coating Product”- A pressurized Ccoating product containing 

pigments or resins that dispenses product ingredients by means of a propellant, 

and is packaged in a disposable can for hand-held application, or for use in 

specialized equipment for ground traffic/marking applications.

 [Capitalize defined words]
1113-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(3) “Air Pollution Control Officer” (APCO)- The person appointed to the position of 

Air Pollution Control Officer of the District pursuant to the provisions of

California Health & Safety Code §40750 and his or her designee.

(4) “Aluminum Roof”- A Coating labeled and formulated exclusively for application

to roofs and containing at least 84 grams of elemental aluminum pigment per liter 

of Coating (at least 0.7 pounds per gallon). Pigment content shall be determined 

in accordance with method referenced in subsection (G)(5)(b). 

[Additional definition added from SCM – a new definition created from Metallic 

Pigmented]

(54) “Antenna Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated exclusively for 

application to equipment and associated structural Aappurtenances that are used 

to receive or transmit electromagnetic signals.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Antenna Coating category is eliminated and will be 

subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(65) “Antifouling Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application to 

submerged stationary structures and their Aappurtenances to prevent or reduce the 

attachment of marine or freshwater biological organisms. To qualify as an 

antifouling Ccoating, the Ccoating must be registered with both the USEPA under

the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. §§136 et seq.) 

and with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Antifouling Coating category is eliminated and will 

be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(67) “Appurtenance”- Any accessory to a stationary structure coated at the site of 

installation, whether installed or detached, including but not limited to: bathroom 

and kitchen fixtures; cabinets; concrete forms; doors; elevators; fences; hand 

railings; heating equipment, air conditioning equipment, and other fixed 

mechanical equipment or stationary tools; lampposts; partitions; pipes and piping 

systems; rain gutters and downspouts; stairways, fixed ladders, catwalks, and fire 

escapes; and window screens.

(78) “Architectural Coating”- A Ccoating to be applied to stationary structures or their 

Aappurtenances at the site of installation, to portable buildings at the site of 

installation, to pavements, or to curbs. Coatings applied in Sshop Aapplications 

or to non-stationary structures such as airplanes, ships, boats, railcars, and 

automobiles, and Aadhesives are not considered aArchitectural Ccoatings for the 

purposes of this rule.
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-3

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

 [Capitalize defined words]

(9) “Basement Specialty Coating”- A clear or opaque Coating that is labeled and 

formulated for application to concrete and masonry surfaces to provide a 

hydrostatic seal for basements and other below-grade surfaces. Coating must

meet the following criteria:

 (a) Coating must be capable of withstanding at least 10 psi of 

hydrostatic pressure, as determined in accordance with test method

referenced in subsection (G)(5)(i).

 (b) Coating must be resistant to mold and mildew growth and must 

achieve a microbial growth rating of eight (8) or more, as determined in 

accordance with test methods referenced in subsection (G)(5)(l).

[Added definition from SCM –a new category created from the combination of 

waterproofing sealer definition and waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer]

(8) “Bay Area Air Qulaity Management District” (BAAQMD) – The air quality 

district created pursuant to Division 26, Part 3, Chapter 4 of the California Health 

and Safety Code (commencing with §40200)

(910) “Bitumens”- Black or brown materials including, but not limited to, asphalt, tar, 

pitch, and asphaltite that are soluble in carbon disulfide, consist mainly of 

hydrocarbons, and are obtained from natural deposits or as residues from the 

distillation of crude petroleum or coal. 

(1011) “Bituminous Roof Coating”- A Ccoating which incorporates Bbitumens that is 

labeled and formulated exclusively for roofing.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(1112) “Bituminous Roof Primer”- A primer which incorporates Bbitumens that is 

labeled and formulated exclusively for roofing and intended for the purpose of 

preparing a weathered or aged surface or improving the adhesion of subsequent 

surfacing components.

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

(1213) “Bond Breaker”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application between 

layers of concrete to prevent a freshly poured top layer of concrete from bonding 

to the layer over which it is poured.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(1314) “California Air Resources Board” (CARB)- The California Air Resources Board, 

the Executive Officer of CARB and his or her authorized representative, the 

powers and duties of which are described in Part 2 of Division 26 of the 

California Health & Safety Code (commencing with §39500).
1113-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(1514) “Clear Brushing Lacquers”- Clear wood finishes, excluding clear lacquer sanding 

sealers, formulated with nitrocellulose or synthetic resins to dry by solvent 

evaporation without chemical reaction and to provide a solid, protective film, 

which are intended exclusively for application by brush, and which are labeled as 

specified in subsection (D)(1)(ef). 

Effective January 1, 2013 the Antenna Coating category is eliminated and will be 

subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(1615) “Clear Wood Coatings”- Clear and semi-transparent Ccoatings, including 

lacquers and varnishes, applied to Wwood Ssubstrates to provide a transparent or 

translucent solid film.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Clear Wood Coating category is eliminated and will 

be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(1617) “Coating”- A material applied onto or impregnated into a substrate for protective, 

decorative, or functional purposes. Such materials include, but are not limited to, 

paints, Vvarnishes, Ssealers, and Sstains.

 [Capitalize defined word]

(1718) “Colorant”- A concentrated pigment dispersion in water, solvent, and/or binder 

that is added to an aArchitectural Ccoating after packaging in sale units to 

produce the desired color.

 [Capitalize defined word]

(1819) “Concrete Curing Compound”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application 

to freshly poured concrete to retard the evaporation of water and/or harden or 

dustproof the surface of freshly poured concrete. 

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

(20) “Concrete/Masonry Sealer”- A clear or opaque Coating that is labeled and 

formulated primarily for application to concrete and masonry surfaces to perform 

one or more of the following functions:

 (a) Prevent penetration of water; or

 (b) Provide resistance against abrasion, alkalis, acids, mildew, 

staining, or ultraviolet light; or

 (c) Harden or dustproof the surface of aged or cured concrete.

[Additional definition added from SCM – new definition created from 

combination of waterproofing sealer and waterproofing Concrete/Masonry 

Sealer]
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-5

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(1921) “District”- The Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, the geographical 

area of which is described District Rule 103.

(22) “Driveway Sealer”- A Coating labeled and formulated for application to worn 

asphalt driveway surfaces to perform one or more of the following functions:

 (a) Fill cracks; or

 (b) Seal the surface to provide protection; or

 (c) Restore or preserve the appearance.

 [Additional definition added from SCM]

(2023) “Dry Fog Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated only for spray application 

such that overspray droplets dry before subsequent contact with incidental 

surfaces in the vicinity of the surface Ccoating activity.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(2124) “Exempt Compound”- A compound identified as exempt under the definition of 

Volatile Organic Compound (VOC), subsection (B)(67). The exempt compound 

content of a coating shall be determined using the applicable calculations and test 

methods found in Section (G). “Exempt Compounds”- Those compounds listed in 

40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 51.100(s). The Exempt Compounds 

content shall be determined by South Coast Air Quality Management District

Method 303-91 (Revised August 1996), Bay Area Air Quality Management 

District Method 41, or Bay Area Air Quality Management District Method 43, 

incorporated by reference in subsections (G)(5)(m), (G)(5)(c), and (G)(5)(d).

 [Corrected definition to standard definition used]

(2225) “Faux Finishing Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated as to meet one or 

more of the following:

 (a) a stain or A glaze or textured Coating used to create artistic effects 

including, but not limited to, dirt, suede, old age, smoke damage, and 

simulated marble and wood grain.

 (b) A decorative Coating used to create a metallic, iridescent, or 

Pearlescent appearance that contains at least 48 grams of Pearlescent mica 

pigment or other iridescent pigment per liter of Coating applied (at least 

0.4 pounds per gallon).

 (c) A decorative Coating used to create a metallic appearance that 

contains less than 48 grams of elemental metallic pigment per liter of 

Coating as applied (less than 0.4 pounds per gallon), when tested in 

accordance method referenced subsection (G)(5)(e).
1113-6 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

 (d) A decorative Coating used to create a metallic appearance that 

contains greater than 48 grams of elemental metallic pigment per liter of 

Coating as applied (greater than 0.4 pounds per gallon) and which requires 

a clear topcoat to prevent the degradation of the finish under normal use 

conditions. The metallic pigment content shall be determined in 

accordance with method referenced subsection (G)(5)(e).

 (e) A clear topcoat to seal and protect a Faux Finishing Coating that 

meets one or more of the requirements of subsection (a) –(d) above. 

These clear topcoats must be sold and used solely as a part of a Faux 

Finishing Coating system, and must be labeled in accordance with 

subsection (D)(1)(d).

 [Revised definition per SCM, capitalize defined words]

(26) “Fire-Resistive Coating”– An opaque cCoating labeled and formulated to protect 

the structural integrity by increasing the fire endurance of interior or exterior steel 

and other structural materials. The category includes sprayed fire resistive 

materials and intumescent Fire-Resistive Coatings that are used to bring structural 

materials into compliance with federal, state, and local building code 

requirements.that has been fire tested and rated by a testing agency approved by 

building code officials for use in bringing assemblies of structural materials into 

compliance with federal, state, and local building code requirements. The FireResistive Coating and the testing agency must be approved by building code 

officials and. The fire resistive coatingshall be tested in accordance with the 

applicable test methods found in Ssubsection (G)(5)(g).

[Correct referenced subsection, capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM, 

corrected for only one test method]

(24)(27)“Fire-Retardant Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated to retard ignition 

and flame spread, that has been fire tested and rated by a testing agency approved 

by building code officials for use in bringing building and construction materials 

into compliance with federal, state and local building code requirements. The 

Ffire-Rretardant Ccoating and the testing agency must be approved by building 

code officials and shall be tested in accordance with the test method referenced in 

subsection (G)(5)(f). The fire-retardant coating shall be tested in accordance with 

applicable test methods found in Section (G).

Effective January 1, 2013 the Fire-Retardant Coating category is eliminated and 

Coatings with fire retardant properties will be subject to the VOC limit of their 

primary category (eg., Flat, Nonflat, etc.).

[Added verbiage from SCM, applicable test removed from SCM] 

(2528) “Flat Coating”- A Ccoating that is not defined under any other definition in this 

rule and that registers gloss less than 15 on an 85-degree meter or less than 5 on a 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-7

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

60-degree meter according to ASTM Designation D 523-89 (1999).to the 

applicable test method found in subsection (G)(5)(h).

 [Changed for consistency with other definitions in section, capitalize defined 

words]

(2629) “Floor Coating”- An opaque Ccoating that is labeled and formulated for 

application to flooring, including, but not limited to, decks, porches, steps, garage 

floors, and other horizontal surfaces which may be subject to foot traffic.

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

(3027) “Flow Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated exclusively for use by 

electric power companies or their subcontractors to maintain the protective 

Ccoating systems present on utility transformer units.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Flow Coating category is eliminated and will be 

subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(2831) “Form-Release Compound”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application to 

a concrete form to prevent the freshly poured concrete from bonding to the form. 

The form may consist of wood, metal, or some material other than concrete.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(2932) “Graphic Arts Coating or Sign Paint”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for 

hand-application by artists using brush, airbrush, or roller techniques to indoor 

and outdoor signs (excluding structural components) and murals including 

lettering enamels, poster colors, copy blockers, and bulletin enamels.

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

 

(3033) “High-Temperature Coating”- A high performance Ccoating labeled and 

formulated for application to substrates exposed continuously or intermittently to 

temperatures above 204oC (400o

F).

 [Capitalize defined words]

(3134) “Industrial Maintenance Coating”- A high performance aArchitectural cCoating, 

including Pprimers, Ssealers, Uundercoaters, intermediate coats, and topcoats, 

formulated for application to substrates, including floors, exposed to one or more 

of the following extreme environmental conditions listed in subsections (a) - (e) 

below, and labeled as specified in subsection (D)(1)(ed).:

 (a) Immersion in water, wastewater, or chemical solutions 

(aqueous and non-aqueous solutions), or chronic exposure of interior 

surfaces to moisture condensation; 
1113-8 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

 (b) Acute or chronic exposure to corrosive, caustic or acidic 

agents, or to chemicals, chemical fumes, or chemical mixtures or 

solutions; 

 (c) Repeated Frequent exposure to temperatures above 121oC (250oF); 

 (d) Repeated (fFrequent) heavy abrasion, including mechanical 

wear and repeated (frequent) scrubbing with industrial solvents, cleansers, 

or scouring agents; or 

 (e) Exterior exposure of metal structures and structural components.

[Revised definition per SCM, capitalize defined word, changed for language 

consistency with SCM, correct referenced subsection]

(3532) “Lacquer”- A clear or opaque wood Ccoating, including clear lacquer sanding 

Ssealers, formulated with cellulosic or synthetic resins to dry by evaporation 

without chemical reaction and to provide a solid, protective film

.

Effective January 1, 2013 the Lacquer category is eliminated and will be 

subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(3336) “Low Solids Coating”- A Ccoating containing 0.12 kilogram or less of solids per 

liter (one (1) pound or less of solids per gallon) of Ccoating material as 

recommended for application by the manufacturer. The VOC Content for Low 

Solids Coating shall be calculated in accordance with subsection (G)(1)(ii).

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

(3437) “Magnesite Cement Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for 

application to magnesite cement decking to protect the magnesite cement substrate 

from erosion by water.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(38) “Manufacturer’s Maximum Thinning Recommendation”- The maximum 

recommendation for thinning that is indicated on the label or lid of the Coating 

container.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(3539) “Mastic Texture Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated to cover holes and 

minor cracks and to conceal surface irregularities, and is applied in a single coat 

of at least 10 mils (0.010 inch) dry film thickness.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(40) “Medium Density Fiberboard” (MDF)- A composite wood product, panel, 

molding, or other building material composed of cellulosic fibers (usually wood) 

made by dry forming and pressing of a resinated fiber mat.

[Additional definition from SCM]
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-9

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(3641) “Metallic Pigmented Coating”- A Coating labeled and formulated to provide a 

metallic appearance. TheA Ccoating containing must contain at least 48 grams of 

elemental metallic pigment (excluding zinc) per liter of Ccoating as applied (at 

least 0.4 pounds per gallon), when tested in accordance with the applicable test 

method found in subsSection (G)(5)(j). The Metallic Pigmented Coating category 

does not include coatings applied to roofs or Zinc-Rich Primers.

[Additional verbiage added from SCM for clarification, capitalize defined words, 

correct referenced subsection]

(3742) “Multi-Color Coating”- A Ccoating that is packaged in a single container and that 

is labeled and formulated to exhibits more than one color when applied in a single 

coat.

 [Capitalize defined words, revised definition per SCM]

(3843) “Nonflat Coating”- A Ccoating that is not defined under any other definition in 

this rule and that registers a gloss of 15 or greater on an 85-degree meter and five 

(5) or greater on a 60-degree meter according to ASTM Designation D 523-89 

(1999)the applicable test method found in subsection (G)(5)(h).

 [Capitalize defined words, correct referenced subsection]

(3944) “Nonflat - High Gloss Coating”- A Nnonflat Ccoating that registers a gloss of 70 

or above on a 60-degree meter according to ASTM Designation D 523-89 

(1999)applicable test method found in subsection (G)(5)(h) and labeled in 

accordance with subsection (D)(1)(l)(i).

 [Capitalize defined words, correct referenced subsection]

(4540) “Nonindustrial Use”- Nonindustrial use means any use of architectural coatings 

except in the construction or maintenance of any of the following: facilities used 

in the manufacturing of goods and commodities; transportation infrastructure, 

including highways, bridges, airports and railroads; facilities used in mining 

activities, including petroleum extraction; and utilities infrastructure, including 

power generation and distribution, and water treatment and distribution systems.

(46) “Particleboard”- A composite wood product panel, molding, or other building 

material composed of cellulosic material (usually wood) in the form of discrete 

particles, as distinguished from fibers, flakes, or strands, which are pressed 

together with resin.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(47) “Pearlescent”- Exhibiting various colors depending on the angles of illumination 

and viewing, as observed in mother-of-pearl.

[Additional definition from SCM]
1113-10 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(48) “Plywood”- A panel product consisting of layers of wood Veneers or composite 

core pressed together with resin. This includes panel products made by either hot 

or cold pressing (with resin) Veneers to a platform.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(4149) “Post-Consumer Coating”- A finished Ccoating that would have been disposed of 

in a landfill, having completed its usefulness to a consumer, and does not include 

manufacturing wastes.is recovered from, or otherwise diverted from, the waste 

stream for the purpose of recycling.

[Language changed for clarification and to match SCM, capitalize defined words]

 (4250) “Pre-Treatment Wash Primer”- A primer that contains a minimum of 0.5 percent 

acid, by weight, is labeled and formulated for application directly to bare metal 

surfaces to provide corrosion resistance and to promote adhesion of subsequent 

topcoats, and is when tested in accordance with the applicable test method found 

in subsection (G)(5)(n). ASTM Designation D 1613-96 that is labeled and 

formulated for application directly to bare metal surfaces to provide corrosion 

resistance and to promote adhesion of subsequent topcoats.

 [Definition updated for consistency with others: to leave ASTM method in Test 

Method section and only reference the section in the definition]

(43) “Primer”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application to a substrate to 

provide a firm bond between the substrate and subsequent coats.

[“Primer” definition included in ‘Primer, Sealer and Undercoater’ definition 

below]

(51) “Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater”- A Coating labeled and formulated for one or 

more of the following purposes:

(a) To provide a firm bond between the substrate and the subsequent 

Coatings; or

(b) To prevent subsequent Coatings from being absorbed by the substrate; or

(c) To prevent harm to subsequent Coatings by materials in the substrate; or

(d) To provide a smooth surface for the subsequent application of Coatings; or

(e) To provide a clear finish coat to seal the substrate; or

(f) To block materials from penetrating into or leaching out of a substrate.

[Changed for consistency with SCM; combined separate definitions]

(5244) “Quick-Dry Enamel”- A nonflat Ccoating that is labeled as specified in 

subsection 4.1.8(D)(1)(k)(i) and that is formulated to have the following 

characteristics:
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-11

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(a) Is capable of being applied directly from the container under normal 

conditions with ambient temperatures between 16o and 27oC (60o and 

80oF);

(b) When tested in accordance with ASTM Designation D 1640-95 sets to 

touch in 2 hours or less, is tack free in 4 hours or less, and dries hard in 8 

hours or less by the mechanical test method; and 

(c) Has a dried film gloss of 70 or above on a 60 degree meter.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Quick-Dry Enamel category is eliminated and will 

be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(5345) “Quick-Dry Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater”- A primer, sealer, or undercoater 

that is dry to the touch in 30 minutes and can be recoated in 2 hours when tested 

in accordance with ASTM Designation D 1640- 95.

. Effective January 1, 2013 the Quick-Dry Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater 

category is eliminated and will be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 

1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

 (54) “Reactive Penetrating Sealer”- A clear or pigmented Coating that is labeled

and formulated for application to above-grade concrete and masonry substrates to 

provide protection from water and waterborne contaminants, including, but not 

limited to, alkalis, acids, and salts. These Sealers must penetrate into concrete 

and masonry substrates and chemically react to form covalent bonds with 

naturally occurring minerals in the substrate. They line the pores of concrete and 

masonry substrates with a hydrophobic Coating, but do not form a surface film. 

Reactive Penetrating Sealers must meet all of the following criteria:

(a) The Reactive Penetrating Sealer must improve water repellency at least 80 

percent after application on a concrete or masonry substrate. This 

performance must be verified in accordance with applicable test methods

found in subsection (G)(5)(p); and

(b) The Reactive Penetrating Sealer must not reduce the water vapor

transmission rate by more than two (2) percent after application on a

concrete or masonry substrate. This performance must be verified in 

accordance with applicable test method found in subsection (G)(5)(q); and

(c) Products labeled and formulated for vehicular traffic surface chloride 

screening applications must meet the performance criteria referenced in 

subsection (G)(5)(o).

(d) Reactive Penetrating Sealers must be labeled in accordance with 

subsection (D)(1)(i)(i).
1113-12 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

[Additional definition added from SCM – New 2010 requirement]

(4655) “Recycled Coating”- An Aarchitectural Ccoating formulated such that it contains

not less than 50 percent of the total weight consists of secondary and by volume 

post-consumer Ccoating, with not less than 10 percent of the total weight 

consisting of post-consumer Ccoating.a maximum of 50 percent by volume 

Secondary Industrial Materials or Virgin Materials.

[Changed for consistency with SCM, capitalize defined words]

(5647) “Residential”- Areas where people reside or lodge, including, but not limited to, 

single and multiple family dwellings, condominiums, mobile homes, apartment 

complexes, motels, and hotels.

(5748) “Roof Coating”- A non-bituminous Ccoating labeled and formulated exclusively 

for application to roofs for the primary purpose of preventing penetration of the 

substrate by water or reflecting heat and ultraviolet radiation. Metallic pigmented 

roof coatings which qualify as metallic pigmented coatings shall not be 

considered to be in this category, but shall be considered to be in the metallic 

pigmented coatings category.

 [Capitalize defined words, eliminated reference to Metallic pigmented roof 

coatings to eliminate conflict with Metallic Pigmented Coating category 

definition, eliminated “exclusively” to match SCM definition]

(5849) “Rust Preventative Coating”- A Ccoating formulated for nonindustrial use to 

prevent the corrosion of metal surfaces for one or more of the following 

applications:

(a) Direct-to-metal Coating; or

(b) Coating intended for application over rusty, previously coated surfaces

The Rust Preventative Coatings does not include the following:

(c) Coatings that are required to be applied as a topcoat over a primer; or

(d) Coatings that are intended for use on wood or any other non-metallic 

surface.

Rust Preventative Coatings must beand labeled as specified in subsection 

(D)(1)(gf)(i).

[Verbiage added for clarity and to match SCM, capitalize defined words]

(5950) “Sanding Sealer”- A clear or semi-transparent wood Ccoating labeled and 

formulated for application to bare wood to seal the wood and to provide a coat 

that can be abraded to create a smooth surface for subsequent applications of 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-13

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

Ccoatings. A Ssanding Ssealer that also meets the definition of a Llacquer is not 

included in this category, but is included in the Llacquer category.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Sanding Sealer category is eliminated and will be 

subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(51) “Sealer”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application to a substrate for one 

or more of the following purposes: to prevent subsequent Ccoatings from being 

absorbed by the substrate, or to prevent harm to subsequent Ccoatings by 

materials in the substrate.

[Deleted-Included in definition for Primer, Sealer, Undercoater (B)(46)]

(52) “Secondary Coating (Rework)”- A fragment of a finished Ccoating or a finished 

Ccoating from a manufacturing process that has converted resources into a 

commodity of real economic value, but does not include excess virgin resources 

of the manufacturing process.

 [Deleted-Not in SCM]

(60) “Secondary Industrial Materials”- Products or by-products of the paint 

manufacturing process that are of known composition and have economic value 

but can no longer be used for their intended purpose.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(61) “Semitransparent Coating”- A Coating that contains binders and colored pigments 

and is formulated to change the color of the surface, but not conceal the grain 

pattern or texture.

[Additional definition from SCM, capitalize defined words]

(5362) “Shellac”- A clear or opaque Ccoating formulated solely with the resinous 

secretions of the lac beetle (Laciffer lacca), thinned with alcohol, and formulated 

to dry by evaporation without a chemical reaction.

 [Capitalize defined words, evised definition per SCM]

(5463) “Shop Application”- Application of a Ccoating to a product or a component of a 

product in or on the premises of a factory or a shop as part of a manufacturing, 

production, or repairing process (e.g., original equipment manufacturing 

Ccoatings).

 [Capitalize defined words]

(5564) “Solicit”- To require for use or to specify, by written or oral contract.

(56) “South Coast Air Quality Management District” (SCAQMD) – The air quality 

district createdpursuant to Division 26, Part 3, Chapter 5.5 of the California 

Health and Safety Code (commencing with §40400).
1113-14 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(5765) “Specialty Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater”- A Ccoating labeled as specified in 

subsection (D)(1)(hg)(i) and that is formulated for application to a substrate to 

sealblock water-soluble Stains resulting from: fire, smoke or water damage; to 

condition excessively chalky surfaces, or to block stains. An excessively chalky 

surface is one that is defined as having a chalk rating of 4 or less as determined by 

ASTM Designation D 4214-98.

[Verbiage changed to match SCM, capitalize defined words, ASTM Method not 

reference in SCM]

(5866) “Stain”- A clear, semitransparent, or opaque Ccoating labeled and formulated to 

change the color of a surface but not conceal the grain pattern or texture.

[Updated to match SCM, capitalize defined words]

(67) “Stone Consolidant”- A Coating that is labeled and formulated for application to 

stone substrates to repair historical structures that have been damaged by 

weathering or other decay mechanisms.

(a) Must penetrate into stone substrates to create bonds between particles and 

consolidate deteriorated material;.

(b) Must be specified and used in accordance with method referenced in 

subsection (G)(5)(r); and.

(c) Labeled for professional use only, in accordance with the labeling 

requirements in subsection (D)(1)(i).

[Additional definition added from SCM]

(6859) “Swimming Pool Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated to coat the 

interior of swimming pools and to resist swimming pool chemicals. Swimming 

Pool Coatings include Coatings used for swimming pool repair and maintenance.

[Clarified to include repair and maintenance, capitalize defined words]

(6960) “Swimming Pool Repair and Maintenance Coating”- A rubber based Ccoating 

labeled and formulated to be used over existing rubber based Ccoatings for the 

repair and maintenance of swimming pools.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Swimming Pool Repair and Maintenance Coating

category is eliminated and will be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 

1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(7061) “Temperature-Indicator Safety Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated as a 

color-changing indicator Ccoating for the purpose of monitoring the temperature 

and safety of the substrate, underlying piping, or underlying equipment, and for 

application to substrates exposed continuously or intermittently to temperatures 

above 204oC (400oF).
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-15

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Temperature-Indicator Safety Coating category is 

eliminated and will be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(6271) “Tint Base”- An Aarchitectural Ccoating to which Ccolorant is added after 

packaging in sale units to produce a desired color.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(6723) “Traffic Marking Coating”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for marking and 

striping streets, highways, or other traffic surfaces including, but not limited to, 

curbs, berms, driveways, parking lots, sidewalks, and airport runways.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(73) “Tub and Tile Refinish Coating”- A clear or opaque Coating that is labeled and 

formulated exclusively for refinishing the surface of a bathtub, shower, sink, or 

countertop. The Coatings must meet all the following criteria:

(a) A scratch hardness of 3H or harder and a gouge hardness of 4H or harder. 

This must be determined in accordance with test method referenced in 

subsection (G)(5)(v).

(b) A weight loss of 20 milligrams or less after 1000 cycles. This must be 

determined in accordance with test method referenced in subsection 

(G)(5)(t).

(c) Capability to withstand 1000 hours or more of exposure with few or no #8 

blisters. This must be determined in accordance with test method 

referenced in subsection (G)(5)(w).

(d) An adhesion rating of 4B or better after 24 hours of recovery. This must 

be determined in accordance with test method referenced in subsection 

(G)(5)(u).

[Additional definition from SCM]

(64) “Undercoater”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated to provide a smooth surface 

for subsequent Ccoatings.

[Not in SCM; included in combined definition of Primer, Sealer, and Undercoater 

above]

(6574) “United States Environmental Protection Agency” (USEPA)- The United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, the Administrator of the USEPA and his or her 

authorized representative. 

(7566) “Varnish”- A clear or semi-transparent wood Ccoating, excluding lacquers and 

Sshellacs, formulated to dry by chemical reaction on exposure to air. Varnishes 

may contain small amounts of pigment to color a surface, or to control the final 

sheen or gloss of the finish.
1113-16 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Varnish category is eliminated and will be subjected 

to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(76) “Veneer”- Thin sheets of wood peeled or sliced from logs for use in the 

manufacture of wood products such as Plywood, laminated Veneer lumber, or 

other products.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(77) “Virgin Materials”- Materials that contain no Post-Consumer Coatings or 

Secondary Industrial Materials.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(6778) “Volatile Organic Compound” (VOC)”- Any volatile compound containing at 

least one atom of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic 

acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate, and those 

compounds listed in 40 CFR 51.100(s)(1).

 [Correct format for defined words, capitalize defined words]

(6879) “VOC Content”- The weight of VOC per volume of Ccoating, calculated 

according to the procedures specified in subsection (G)(1). VOC Content is VOC 

Regulatory, as defined in subsection (G)(1)(a)(i), for all coatings expect those in 

the Low Solids category. For coating in the Low Solids category, the VOC 

Content is VOC Actual, as defined in subsection (G)(1)(a)(ii). If the coating is a 

multi-component product, the VOC Content is VOC Content as mixed or 

catalyzed. If the coating contains silanes, siloxanes, or other ingredients that 

generate ethanol or other VOCs during the curing process, the VOC content must 

include the VOCs emitted during curing.

 [Capitalize defined words, definition updated to reflect SCM]

(8069) “Waterproofing Sealer”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated for application to a 

porous substrate for the primary purpose of preventing the penetration of water.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Waterproofing Sealer category is eliminated and 

will be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]

(8170) “Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer”- A clear or pigmented film-forming 

Ccoating that is labeled and formulated for sealing concrete and masonry to 

provide resistance against water, alkalis, acids, ultraviolet light, and Sstaining.

 Effective January 1, 2013 the Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealer Coating 

category is eliminated and will be subjected to the applicable VOC limits of Table 

1.

 [Added for clarification that category will be eliminated 1/1/2013]
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-17

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(82) “Waterproofing Membrane” – A clear or opaque Coating that is labeled and 

formulated for application to concrete and masonry surfaces to provide a seamless 

waterproofing membrane that prevents any penetration of liquid water into 

substrate. Intended for the following applications: below-grade surfaces, 

between concrete slabs, inside tunnels, inside concrete planters, and under 

flooring materials Waterproofing Membranes must meet the following criteria:

Coating must be applied in a single coat of at least 25 mils (at least 0.025 inch) 

dry film thickness; and

Coating must meet or exceed the requirements referenced in subsection (G)(5)(y).

The Waterproofing Membrane category does not include topcoats that are 

included in the Concrete/Masonry Sealer category (e.g., parking deck topcoats, 

pedestrian deck topcoats, etc.).

[Additional definition from SCM – new category created from combination of waterproofing 

sealer and waterproofing concrete/masonry]

(83) “Wood Coatings”- Coatings labeled and formulated for application to Wood 

Substrates only. The category includes the following: clear and Semitransparent 

Coatings; Lacquers; Varnishes; Sanding Sealers; penetrating oils; clear Stains; 

wood conditioner used as undercoats; wood Sealers used as topcoats; opaque 

Wood Coatings: opaque lacquers; opaque sanding Sealers; and opaque lacquer 

Undercoaters. The category does not include the following: clear Sealers that are 

labeled and formulated for use on concrete/masonry surfaces; or Coatings 

intended for substrates other than wood. Wood Coatings must be labeled “For 

Wood Substrates Only”, in accordance with subsection (D)(1)(m)(i).

[Definition added from SCM – replaces definitions above: Lacquers, Varnishes, 

Sanding Sealers, Clear Stains, new requirements for 2010]

(7184) “Wood Preservative”- A Ccoating labeled and formulated to protect exposed 

wood from decay or insect attack, that is registered with both the U.S. EPA under 

the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. §§136 et seq.) 

and with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 

 [Capitalize defined words]

(85) “Wood Substrate”- A substrate made of wood, Particleboard, Plywood, Medium 

Density Fiberboard, rattan, wicker, bamboo, or composite products with exposed 

wood grain. Wood Products do not include items comprised of simulated wood.

[Additional definition from SCM]

(86) “Zinc-Rich Primer”- A Coating that meets all of the following specifications:

(a) Coating contains at least 65 percent metallic zinc powder or zinc dust by 

weight of total solids; and
1113-18 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(b) Coating is formulated for application to metal substrates to provide a firm 

bond between the substrate and subsequent applications of Coating; and

(c) Coating is intended for professional use only and is labeled as such, in 

accordance with the labeling requirements in subsection (D)(1)(n)(i).

[Additional definition from SCM, new requirements for 2010]

(C) Requirements

(1) VOC Content Limits 

(a) Except as provided in subsections (C)(2), (C)(3), and (C)(85), and (C)(9), 

no person shall: 

(i) Mmanufacture, blend, or repackage for usesale within the 

Ddistrict;

(ii) Ssupply, sell, or offer for sale for use within the Ddistrict; or

(iii) Ssolicit for application or apply within the Ddistrict,

any Aarchitectural Ccoating with a VOC Ccontent in excess of the 

corresponding limit specified in Table 1 or Table 2, after the specified 

effective date in Table 1 or Table 2. Limits are expressed as VOC 

Content, thinned to the Manufacture’s Maximum Thinning 

Recommendation, excluding any Colorant added to Tint Bases.

[(C)(9) is no longer applicable, clarified “for use” and added Table 2 

applicability, added statement copied from SCM, capitalize defined words]

(1) Most Restrictive VOC Limit 

(a) If anywhere on the container of any Aarchitectural Ccoating, or any label 

or sticker affixed to the container, or in any sales, advertising, or technical 

literature supplied by a manufacturer, or anyone acting on their behalf, 

any representation is made that indicates that the Ccoating meets the 

definition of, or is recommended for use for more than one of the Ccoating 

categories listed in Table 1 or Table 2, then the most restrictive VOC 

Ccontent limit shall apply. This provision does not apply to the following 

Ccoating categories: 

(xi) Antenna coatings.

(xii) Antifouling coatings.

(xiv) Bituminous roof primers.

(xii) Flow coatings.

(iv) Fire-retardant coatings.

(ix) High temperature coatings.

(vi) Industrial maintenance coatings. 

(i) Lacquer coatings (including lacquer sanding sealers).
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-19

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

() Low-solids coatings.

(viii)Metallic pigmented coatings.

Pretreatment Wash Primers.

(iii) Shellacs.

(xv) Specialty primers, sealers, and undercoaters.(x) Temperatureindicator safety coatings.

(viii) Wood preservatives.

[Updated to reflect limits both before and after 1/1/2013 effective date]

 (3) Specialty Coating Categories

(a) If a Coating meets a definition in Section (B) for one or more specialty 

coating categories that are listed in Table 1 or Table 2, then that Coating is 

not required to meet the VOC limits for Flat, NonFlat, or Nonflat-High 

Gloss Coatings, but is required to meet the VOC limit for the applicable 

specialty Coating listed in Table 1 or Table 2.

 [Added for clarity from Placer Counties Rule 218]

(b) For any Coating that does not meet any of the definitions for the specialty 

Coatings categories listed in Table 1 or Table 2, the VOC Content limit 

shall be determined by classifying the Coating as a Flat Coating, Nonflat 

Coating, or Nonflat - High Gloss Coating based on its gloss, as defined in 
1113-20 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

subsections (B)(28), (B)(43), and (B)(44) and the corresponding Flat, 

Nonflat, or Nonflat High Gloss VOC limit shall apply.

[Capitalize defined words, added verbiage from SCM, correct referenced section, 

moved from section previously entitled “Coatings Not Listed in Table 1” 

to this category for clarification]

 (4) Eliminated Categories

(a) Effective January 1, 2013 the Coating categories listed in Table 2 are 

eliminated, and these Coatings will be subject to the VOC limit for the 

applicable category in Table 1, except as provided in subsections (C)(2), 

(C)(3) and (C)(5).

[Added for clarity from Placer Counties Rule 218, 01/01/2013 set at 

approximately one year from date of adoption, added reference to Section 

(C)(5)]]

(3)(5) Sell-Through of Coatings 

(a) A Ccoating listed in Table 1 or Table 2 and manufactured prior to the May 

24, 2003 January 1, 2013 effective date specified for that coating in Table 

1 may be sold, supplied, or offered for sale for up to three years after the 

February 24, 2003January 1, 2013, so long as the Coating complied with 

the standards in effect at the time the Coating was manufactured.. (b)

A Ccoating listed in Table 1 or Table 2 and manufactured before 

the January 1, 2013May 24, 2003 effective date for that coating in Table 1 

may be applied at any time, both before and after May 24, 2003January 1, 

2013, so long as the Ccoating complied with the standards in effect at the

time the Ccoating was manufactured. This subsection does not apply to 

any Ccoating that does not display the date or date-code required by 

subsection (D)(1)(a). 

[Input as a result of Comment Letter 3, Number 2 and Comment Letter 5, 

Number 8]

(c) A Ccoating included in an approved Averaging Program that does not 

comply with the specified limit in Table 1:

(i) May be sold, supplied, or offered for sale for up to three years after 

the end of the compliance period specified in the approved 

Averaging Program; and 

(ii) Such a Ccoating may be applied at any time, both during and after 

the compliance period specified in the approved Averaging 

Program.

(iii) Subsection (C)(3)(c) does not apply to any Ccoating that does not 

display on the container either the statement: "This product is 

subject to aArchitectural cCoatings averaging provisions in 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-21

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

California" or a substitute symbol specified by the Executive 

Officer of the California Air Resources Board.

(iv) Subsection (C)(3)(c) shall remain in effect until January 1, 2008. 

[Averaging Program is no longer in effect, ended 1-1-08, dates changed to 

reflect current SCM, capitalize defined words]

(4)(6) Painting Practices

(a)(a) All Aarchitectural Ccoating containers used to apply the contents therein 

to a surface directly from the container by pouring, siphoning, brushing, 

rolling, padding, ragging or other means, shall be closed when not in use. 

These Aarchitectural Ccoating containers include, but are not limited to, 

drums, buckets, cans, pails, trays or other application containers. 

[Capitalize defined words]

(b)(a) Containers of any VOC-containing materials used for thinning and 

cleanup shall also be closed when not in use. 

(5)(7) Thinning 

(a) No person who applies or Ssolicits the application of any Aarchitectural 

Ccoating shall apply a Ccoating that is thinned to exceed the applicable 

VOC limit specified in Table 1 or Table 2.

[Capitalize defined words add applicable reference to Table 2]

(3)8Rust Preventative Coatings 

(a) Effective January 1, 2004until January 1, 2013, a person shall only apply 

or Ssolicit the application of a rust preventative Ccoating for nonindustrial uses, unless the rust preventative Ccoating complies with the 

industrial maintenance Ccoating VOC limit specified in Table 1.

[01/01/2013 the Rust Preventative Coatings category is eliminated]

(7)Coatings Not Listed in Table 1 

(a) For any coating that does not meet any of the definitions for the specialty 

coatings categories listed in Table 1, the VOC content limit shall be 

determined by classifying the coating as a flat coating or a nonflat coating, 

based on its gloss, as defined in subsections (B)(25), (B)(38), and (B)(39) 

and the corresponding flat or nonflat VOC limit shall apply.

[Section moved to Section (C)(3)(b) for clarity]

(8) Lacquers

(a)Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (C)(1), a person or facility may 
1113-22 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

add up to ten percent (10%) by volume of VOC to a lacquer to avoid 

blushing of the finish during days with relative humidity greater than 

seventy percent (70%) and temperature below 65oF, at the time of 

application, provided that prior to the addition of VOC:

(i) the Ccoating contains acetone; and 

(ii) no more than 550 grams of VOC per liter of Ccoating, less water 

and Eexempt Ccompounds.

[Deleted - Not in SCM]

(9) Averaging Compliance Option 

(a) On or after February 24, 2003, in lieu of compliance with the specified 

limits in Table 1 for floor Ccoatings; industrial maintenance Ccoatings; 

primers, Ssealers, and Uundercoaters; quick-dry primers, Ssealers, and 

Uundercoaters; quick-dry enamels; roof Ccoatings; Bbituminous Rroof 

Ccoatings rust preventative Ccoatings; Sstains; waterproofing Ssealers, as 

well as flats and non-flats (excluding recycled Ccoatings), manufacturers 

may average designated Ccoatings such that their actual cumulative 

emissions from the averaged Ccoatings are less than or equal to the 

cumulative emissions that would have been allowed under those limits 

over a compliance period not to exceed one year.

(b) Such manufacturers must also comply with the averaging provisions 

contained in Appendix A, as well as maintain and make available for 

inspection records for at least three years after the end of the compliance 

period.

(c) This subsection and Appendix A shall cease to be effective on January 1, 

2005, after which averaging will no longer be allowed.

[Averaging Option expired in 1-1-08]

(9) Early Compliance Provision

(a) Prior to January 1, 2013, any coating that meets a definition in Section (B) 

for a coating category listed in Table 1 and complies with the applicable 

VOC limit in Table 1 and with Sections (C)(2) and (D) shall be considered 

in compliance with this rule.

(D) Container Labeling Requirements 

(1) Each manufacturer of any Aarchitectural Ccoating subject to this rule shall 

display the following information on the Ccoating container (or label) in which 

the Ccoating is sold or distributed.
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-23

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(a) Date Code 

(i) The date the Ccoating was manufactured, or a date code 

representing the date the Coating was manufactured, shall be 

indicated on the label, lid, or bottom of the container. 

(ii) If the manufacturer uses a date code for any Ccoating, the 

manufacturer shall file an explanation of each code with CARB.

(b) Thinning Recommendations 

(i) A statement of the manufacturer’s recommendation regarding 

thinning of the Ccoating shall be indicated on the label or lid of the 

container. 

(ii) This requirement does not apply to the thinning of Aarchitectural 

Ccoatings with water. 

(iii) If thinning of the Ccoating prior to use is not necessary, the 

recommendation must specify that the Ccoating is to be applied 

without thinning.

[Language added for clarity, capitalize defined words]

(c) VOC Content 

(i) Each container of any Ccoating subject to this rule shall display 

one of the following values in grams of VOC per liter of coating: 

either the maximum or the actual VOC content of the coating, as 

supplied, including the maximum thinning as recommended by the 

manufacturer. 

(i) Maximum VOC Content as determined from all potential product 

formulations; or

(ii) VOC Content as determined from actual formulation data; or

(iii) VOC Content as determined using the applicable test methods in 

Section (G)(2).

(iv) If the manufacturer does not recommend thinning, the container 

must display the VOC content, as supplied.

(v) If the manufacturer recommends thinning, the container must 

display the VOC content, including the maximum amount of 

thinning solvent recommended by the manufacturer.

(vi) Effective January 1, 2013, if the coating is a multi-component 

product, the container must display the VOC content as mixed or 

catalyzed.

(vii) Effective January 1, 2013, if the coating contains silanes, 

siloxanes, or other ingredients that generate ethanol or other VOCs 

during the curing process, the VOC content must include the 

VOCs emitted during curing.

 
1113-24 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(ii) VOC content shall be displayed in grams of VOC per liter of 

coating. 

(iii) VOC content displayed shall be calculated using product 

formulation data, or shall be determined using the test methods in 

subsection (G)(2). The equations in subsection (G)(1) shall be 

used to calculate VOC content.

[Added language and clarification from SCM and Bay Area AQMD, 

capitalize defined words]

(d) Faux Finishing Coatings

(i) Effective 01/01/2013 the labels of all clear topcoat Faux Finishing 

Coatings shall prominently display the statement “This product can 

only be sold or used as part of a Faux Finishing Coating system”.

[Added from SCM – definition added in Section (B) above as well, January 1, 

2013 approximately one year from date of adoption]

(de) Industrial Maintenance Coatings 

(i) In addition to the information specified in subsection (D)(1)(a), 

(D)(1)(b), and (D)(1)(c), each manufacturer of any The labels of all 

Iindustrial Mmaintenance Ccoating subject to this rule shall 

display on the label or lid of the container in which the Ccoating is 

sold or distributed one or more of the descriptions listed in 

subsections (a) - (c) below.:

a. “For industrial use only”.

b. “For professional use only”.

c. “Not for Rresidential use” or “Not intended for Rresidential 

use”.

[Changed wording to be consistent with other labeling requirements, 

copied from SCM, capitalize defined words]

(e)f Clear Brushing Lacquers 

(i) Effective May 24, 2003, tThe labels of all Cclear Bbrushing 

Llacquers shall prominently display the statements “For brush 

application only,” and “This product must not be thinned or 

sprayed”.

 Category is eliminated as of January 1, 2013.

 [Category is eliminated per SCM]

(gf) Rust Preventative Coatings 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-25

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(i) Effective May 24, 2003, tThe labels of all Rrust Ppreventative 

Ccoatings shall prominently display the statement “For Metal 

Substrates Only”.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(hg) Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 

(i) Effective May 24, 2003, tThe labels of all Sspecialty Pprimers, 

Ssealers, and Uundercoaters shall prominently display one or more 

of the descriptions listed in subsections (a) - (ec) below. 

a. For blocking Sstains.

ba. “For fire-damaged substrates”. 

cb. “For smoke-damaged substrates”. 

dc. “For water-damaged substrates”. 

e. For excessively chalky substrates.

[Copied from SCM]

(ii) Until January 1, 2013, the Specialty Primer, Sealer, and 

Undercoater category includes coatings formulated to seal 

excessively chalky surfaces. An excessively chalky surface is one 

that is defined as having a chalk rating of four or less as 

determined by ASTM Designation D 4214-98. Until January 1, 

2013, the labels of Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 

may display “For excessively chalky substrates” instead of, or in 

conjunction with, one or more of the descriptions listed in Section 

(D)(1)(h)(i) above.

[Input as a result of Comment Letter 5, Number 14 and Comment Letter 3, 

Number 3]

 (i) Reactive Penetrating Sealers

(i) Effective 01/01/2013, the labels of all Reactive Penetrating Sealers 

shall prominently display the statement “Reactive Penetrating 

Sealer”.

[Copied from SCM, 01/01/2013 approximately one year from date of adoption]

 (j) Stone Consolidants

(i) Effective 01/01/2013 the labels of all Stone Consolidants shall 

prominently display the statement “Stone Consolidant – For 

Professional Use Only”

 [Coped from SCM, 01/01/2013 approximately one year from date of adoption]
1113-26 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(kh) Quick Dry Enamels 

(i) Effective May 24, 2003, tThe labels of all quick dry enamels shall 

prominently display the words “Quick Dry” and the dry hard time.

 Category is eliminated as of January 1, 2013.

[Category eliminated per SCM]

(il) Nonflat - High Gloss Coatings 

(i) (i) Effective May 24, 2003, tThe labels of all Nnonflat - Hhigh 

Ggloss Ccoatings shall prominently display the words “High 

Gloss”.

[Capitalize defined words]

 (m) Wood Coatings

(i) Effective 01/01/2013, the labels of all Wood Coatings shall 

prominently display the statement “For Wood Substrates Only”.

[Copied from SCM 01/01/2013 approximately one year from date of adoption]

(n) Zinc Rich Primers

(i) Effective 01/01/2013, the labels of all Zinc Rich Primers shall 

prominently display the statement display one or more of the 

descriptions listed in subsections (a) - (c) below.

a. “For professional use only”.

b. “For industrial use only”.

c. “Not for residential use” or “Not intended for 

residential use”

[Copied from SCM and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Rule 4601, 01/01/2013 approximately one year from date of adoption]

(E) Reporting Requirements 

(1)Clear Brushing Lacquers 

(a) Each manufacturer of clear brushing lacquers shall, on or before April 1 of 

each calendar year beginning in the year 2004, submit an annual report to 

CARB. The report shall specify the number of gallons of clear brushing 

lacquers sold in the State during the preceding calendar year, and shall 

describe the method used by the manufacturer to calculate State sales.
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-27

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(2)Rust Preventive Coatings

(a) Each manufacturer of rust preventative Ccoatings shall, on or before April 

1 of each calendar year beginning in the year 2004, submit an annual 

report to CARB. The report shall specify the number of gallons of rust 

preventative Ccoatings sold in the State during the preceding calendar 

year, and shall describe the method used by the manufacturer to calculate 

State sales.

(3)Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 

(a) Each manufacturer of Sspecialty Pprimers, Ssealers, and Uundercoaters 

shall, on or before April 1 of each calendar year beginning in the year 

2004, submit an annual report to CARB. The report shall specify the 

number of gallons of Sspecialty Pprimers, Ssealers, and Uundercoaters 

sold in the State during the preceding calendar year, and shall describe the 

method used by the manufacturer to calculate State sales.

(4) Toxic Exempt Compounds 

(a) For each Aarchitectural Ccoating that contains perchloroethylene or 

methylene chloride, the manufacturer shall, on or before April 1 of each 

calendar year beginning with the year 2004, report to CARB the following 

information for products sold in the State during the preceding year:

(i) the product brand name and a copy of the product label with 

legible usage instructions;

(ii) the product category listed in Table 1 to which the Ccoating 

belongs;

(iii) the total sales in California during the calendar year to the nearest 

gallon;

(iv) the volume percent, to the nearest 0.10 percent, of 

perchloroethylene and methylene chloride in the Ccoating.

(5) Recycled Coatings

(a) Manufacturers of recycled Ccoatings must submit a letter to CARB 

certifying their status as a Recycled Paint Manufacturer. The 

manufacturer shall, on or before April 1 of each calendar year beginning 

with the year 2004, submit an annual report to CARB. The report shall 

include, for all recycled Ccoatings, the total number of gallons distributed 

in the State during the preceding year, and shall describe the method used 

by the manufacturer to calculate State distribution.

(6) Bituminous Coatings
1113-28 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(a) Each manufacturer of Bbituminous Rroof Ccoatings or Bbituminous Rroof 

Pprimers shall, on or before April 1 of each calendar year beginning with 

the year 2004, submit an annual report to CARB. The report shall specify 

the number of gallons of Bbituminous Rroof Ccoatings or Bbituminous 

Rroof Pprimers sold in the State during the preceding calendar year, and 

shall describe the method used by the manufacturer to calculate State 

sales.

(1) Sales Data

(a) A responsible official from each manufacturer shall upon request of the 

Executive Officer of the CARB, or his or her delegate, provide data 

concerning the distribution and sales of Architectural Coatings. The 

responsible official shall within 180 days provide information, including, 

but not limited to:

(i) The name and mailing address of the manufacturer; 

(ii) The name, address and telephone number of a contact person; 

(iii) The name of the Coating product as it appears on the label and the

applicable Coating category; 

(iv) Whether the product is marketed for interior or exterior use or 

both; 

(v) The number of gallons sold in California in containers greater than

one (1) liter (1.057 quart) and equal to or less than one (1) liter

(1.057 quart); 

(vi) The VOC Actual content and VOC Regulatory content in grams 

per liter. If thinning is recommended, list the VOC Actual content

and VOC Regulatory content after maximum recommended 

thinning. If containers less than one (1) liter have a different VOC 

Content than containers greater than one (1) liter, list separately. If 

the Coating is a multi-component product, provide the VOC

Content as mixed or catalyzed; 

(vii) The names and Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) numbers of the 

VOC constituents in the product; 

(viii) The names and CAS numbers of any compounds in the product

specifically exempted from the VOC definition, as referenced in

subsection (B)(78);

(ix) Whether the product is marketed as solventborne, waterborne, or

100 percent solids; 

(x) Description of resin or binder in the product;

(xi) Whether the Coating is a single-component or multi-component

product;

(xii) The density of the product in pounds per gallon; 

(xiii) The percent by weight of: solids, all volatile materials, water, and

any compounds in the product specifically exempted from the 

VOC definition, as referenced in subsection (B)(78); and
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-29

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(xiv) The percent by volume of: solids, water, and any compounds in the

product specifically exempted from the VOC definition, as 

referenced in subsection (B)(78).

(b) All sales data listed in subsections (E)(1)(a)(i) through (E)(1)(a)(xiv) shall 

be maintained by the responsible official for a minimum of three (3) years. 

Sales data submitted by the responsible official to the Executive Officer of 

the CARB may be claimed as confidential, and such information shall be 

handled in accordance with the procedures specified in Title 17, California 

Code of Regulations Sections 91000-91022.

(c) Although Tertiary Butyl Acetate (TBAc) is exempt as a VOC when 

determining VOC content of a coating and compliance with emission 

limitations, it remains a VOC for purposes of all recordkeeping, emissions

inventory, and dispersion modeling and must be treated as such.

 [Added from 40 CFR 51.100(s)(5) with modifications from MDAQMD 

tBAc Policy]]

[Section updated to reflect requirements in SCM, with some modification from 40 

CFR51.100(s)(5) and MDAWMD tBAc Policy]

(F) Administrative Requirements

(1) District Rule 442 Applicability 

(a) Any Ccoating, Ccoating operation, or facility which is exempt from all or 

a portion of the VOC limits of this rule shall comply with the provisions of 

District Rule 442.

[Capitalize defined words]

 (2) Severability

(a) Each provision of this rule shall be deemed severable, and in the event that 

any provision of this rule is held to be invalid, the remainder of this rule 

shall continue in full force and effect.

[Added from Kern County Rule 410.1A and similar verbiage in Placer County

Rule 218]

(G) Compliance Provisions and Test Methods 

(1) Calculation of VOC Content 

(a) (a) For the purpose of determining compliance with the VOC Ccontent limits 

in Table 1 and Table 2, the VOC Ccontent of a Ccoating shall be determined 

by using the procedures described in subsection (i) or (ii) below, as 

appropriate. If the manufacture does not recommend thinning, the VOC 

Content must be calculated for the product as Thesupplied. The VOC 
1113-30 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

Ccontent of a Ttint Bbase shall be determined without Ccolorant that is added 

after the Ttint Bbase is manufactured. Effective January 1, 2013 if the coating 

is a multi-component product, the VOC Content must be calculated as mixed 

or catalyzed. Effective January 1, 2013, if the coating contains silanes, 

siloxanes, or other ingredients that generate ethanol or other VOCs during the 

curing process, the VOC Content must include the VOCs emitted during 

curing.

[Added from SCM and for clarification, capitalize defined words, add reference 

to Table 2]

(i) With the exception of Llow Ssolids Ccoatings, determine the VOC 

Ccontent in grams of VOC per liter of Ccoating thinned to the 

manufacturer's maximum recommendation, excluding the volume 

of any water and Eexempt Ccompounds. Determine the VOC 

Ccontent using equation 1 as follows:

Where:

VOC 

Regulatory

= grams of VOC per liter of 

Coating

Ws = weight of volatiles, in grams

Ww = weight of water, in grams

Wec = weight of Exempt Compounds, 

in grams

Vm = volume of Coating, in liters

Vw = volume of water, in liters

Vec = volume of Exempt Compounds, 

in liters

VOC Content = grams of VOC per liter of coating

Ws = weight of volatiles, in grams

Ww = weight of water, in grams

Wec = weight of exempt compounds, in grams

Vm = volume of coating, in liters

Vw = volume of water, in liters

 

V ) ec ( Vm - Vw - 

W ) ec W - Ww - s

 (

VOC Regulatory =
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-31

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

Vec = volume of exempt compounds, in liters

[Put in table format]

(ii) For Llow Ssolids Ccoatings, determine the VOC Ccontent in units 

of grams of VOC per liter of Ccoating thinned to the 

manufacturer's maximum recommendation, including the volume 

of any water and Eexempt Ccompounds. Determine the VOC 

Ccontent using equation 2 as follows:

Where:

VOC Actual = the VOC content of a low solids Coating 

grams of VOC per liter of Coating

Ws = weight of volatiles, in grams

Ww = weight of water, in grams

Wec = weight of Exempt Compounds, in grams

Vm = volume of Coating, in liters

VOC Contentls = the VOC content of a low solids coating in 

grams of VOC per liter of coating

Ws = weight of volatiles, in grams

Ww = weight of water, in grams

Wec = weight of exempt compounds, in grams

Vm = volume of coating, in liters

[Verbiage changed to match 40 CFR 59, capitalize defined words, put in table 

format]

(2) VOC Content of Coatings 

(a) To determine the physical properties of a Ccoating in order to perform the 

calculations in subsection (G)(1), the reference method for VOC Ccontent 

is USEPA Method 24, incorporated by reference in subsection (G)(5)(xk), 

except as provided in subsections (G)(3) and (G)(4). 

(b) An alternative method to determine the VOC Ccontent of Ccoatings is 

SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District Method 304-91 

(Revised February 1996), incorporated by reference in subsection 

(G)(5)(al). 

(c) The Eexempt Ccompounds content shall be determined by SCAQMD 

South Coast Air Quality Management District Method 303-91 (Revised 

August 1996), Bay Area Air Quality Management District Method 41, or 

 

 ( Vm ) 

W ) ec W - Ww - s

 (

VOC Actual =
1113-32 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

Bay Area Air Quality Management District Method 43, incorporated by 

reference in subsections (G)(5)(mj), (G)(5)(c), and (G)(5)(d).

(d) To determine the VOC Ccontent of a Ccoating, the manufacturer may use 

USEPA Method 24, or an alternative method as provided in subsection 

(G)(3), formulation data, or any other reasonable means for predicting that 

the Ccoating has been formulated as intended (e.g., quality assurance 

checks, record keeping). 

(i) However, if there are any inconsistencies between the results of a 

USEPA Method 24 test and any other means for determining VOC 

Ccontent, the USEPA Method 24 test results will govern, except 

when an alternative method is approved as specified in subsection 

(G)(3). The APCO may require the manufacturer to conduct a 

USEPA Method 24 analysis.

 [Added USEPA to Method 24 for clarification, capitalize defined words]

(3) Alternative Test Methods 

(a) Other test methods demonstrated to provide results that are acceptable for 

purposes of determining compliance with subsection (G)(2), after review 

and approved in writing by the District, CARB, and USEPA, may also be 

used. 

(4) Methacrylate Traffic Marking Coatings 

(a) Analysis of methacrylate multicomponent Ccoatings used as Ttraffic 

Mmarking Ccoatings shall be conducted according to a modification of 

USEPA Method 24 (40 CFR 59, subpart D, Appendix A), incorporated by 

reference in subsection (G)(5)(km). 

(b) This method has not been approved for methacrylate multicomponent 

Ccoatings used for other purposes than as Ttraffic Mmarking Ccoatings or 

for other classes of multicomponent Ccoatings.

[Capitalize defined words]

(5) Test Methods: The following test methods are incorporated by reference herein, 

and shall be used to test Ccoatings subject to the provisions of this rule:

(ae) Acid Content of Coatings: The acid content of a coating shall be 

determined by ASTM Designation D 1613-96, “Standard Test Method for 

Acidity in Volatile Solvents and Chemical Intermediates Used in Paint, 

Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Products”.

(b) Alternative VOC Content of Coatings: The VOC Ccontent of Ccoatings 

may be analyzed either by U.S. EPA Method 24 or SCAQMDSouth Coast 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-33

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

Air Quality Management District Method 304-91 (Revised 1996), 

“Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Various 

Materials,” SCAQMDSouth Coast Air Quality Management District

Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples.

[Capitalize defined words, SCAQMD no longer included in definitions]

(c) Aluminum Roof Coatings: The metallic content of the Coating shall be 

determined by South Coast Air Quality Management District Method 318-

95, “Determination of Weight Percent Elemental Metal in Coatings by XRay Diffraction”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(x) Drying Times: The set-to-touch, dry-hard, dry-to-touch, and dry-to-recoat 

times of a Ccoating shall be determined by ASTM Designation D 1640-

95, “Standard Test Methods for Drying, Curing, or Film Formation of 

Organic Coatings at Room Temperature”. The tack-free time of a quickdry enamel Ccoating shall be determined by the Mechanical Test Method 

of ASTM Designation D 1640-95.

[Deleted - Not in SCM]

(di) Exempt Compounds--Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF): The Eexempt 

Ccompound parachlorobenzotrifluoride, shall be analyzed as an exempt 

compound for compliance with Ssection (G)6 by BAAQMDBay Area Air 

Quality Management District Method 41, “Determination of Volatile 

Organic Compounds in Solvent Based Coatings and Related Materials 

Containing Parachlorobenzotrifluoride,” BAAQMDBay Area Air Quality 

Management District Manual of Procedures, Volume III, adopted 

12/20/95.

[Capitalize defined words, BAAQMD no longer included in definitions]

(e) Exempt Compounds--Siloxanes: Exempt compounds that are cyclic, 

branched, or linear completely methylated siloxanes, shall be analyzed as 

Eexempt Ccompounds for compliance with Ssection (G)6 by 

BAAQMDBay Area Air Quality Management District Method 43, 

“Determination of Volatile Methylsiloxanes in Solvent-Based Coatings, 

Inks, and Related Materials,” BAAQMDBay Area Air Quality 

Management District Manual of Procedures, Volume III, adopted 11/6/96.

[Capitalize defined words, BAAQMD no longer included in definitions]

(f) Faux Finishing Coating: The metallic content of the Coating shall be 

determined by South Coast Air Quality Management District Method 318-

95, “Determination of Weight Percent Elemental Metal in Coatings by XRay Diffraction”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]
1113-34 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

(ga) Flame Spread Index: The flame spread index of a fire-retardant Ccoating 

shall be determined by ASTM Designation E 84-9907, “Standard Test 

Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials”.

[Updated to test method referenced in SCM]

(hb) Fire Resistance Rating: The fire resistance rating of a fire-resistive 

Ccoating shall be determined by ASTM Designation E 119-9807, 

“Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction 

Materials”.

[Updated to test method referenced in SCM]

(ic) Gloss Determination: The gloss of a Ccoating shall be determined by 

ASTM Designation D 523-89 (1999), “Standard Test Method for Specular 

Gloss”

(j) Hydrostatic Pressure for Basement Specialty Coatings: ASTM D7088-04, 

“Standard Practice for Resistance to Hydrostatic Pressure for Coatings 

Used in Below Grade Applications Applied to Masonry.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(kd) Metal Content of Coatings: The metallic content of a Ccoating shall be 

determined by SCAQMDSouth Coast Air Quality Management Distict

Method 318-95, “Determination of Weight Percent Elemental Metal in 

Coatings by X-Ray Diffraction,” SCAQMDSouth Coast Air Quality 

Management District Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement 

Samples.

[Capitalize defined words]

(l) Methacrylate Traffic Marking Coatings: The VOC Ccontent of 

methacrylate multicomponent Ccoatings used as Ttraffic Mmarking 

Ccoatings shall be analyzed by the procedures in 40 CFR part 59, subpart 

D, appendix A, “Determination of Volatile Matter Content of 

Methacrylate Multicomponent Coatings Used as Traffic Marking 

Coatings” (September 11, 1998).

[Capitalize defined words]

(m) Mold and Mildew Growth for Basement Specialty Coatings: ASTM 

D3273-00, “Standard Test Method for Resistance to Growth of Mold on 

the Surface of Interior Coatings in an Environmental Chamber” and 

ASTM D3274-95, “Standard Test Method for Evaluating Degree of 

Surface Disfigurement of Paint Films by Microbial (Fungal or Algal) 

Growth or Soil and Dirt Accumulation”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-35

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(nj) Other Exempt Compounds: The content of compounds exempt under U.S. 

EPA Method 24 shall be analyzed by SCAQMDSouth Coast Air Quality 

Management District Method 303-91 (Revised 19936), “Determination of 

Exempt Compounds,” SCAQMDSouth Coast Air Quality Management 

District Laboratory Methods of Analysis for Enforcement Samples.

[Correct revision year]

(o) Pre-Treatment Wash Primer: ASTM D1613-06, “Standard Test Method 

for Acidity in Volatile Solvents and Chemical Intermediates Used in Paint, 

Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Products”.

[Added to support definition in Section (B)]

(p) Reactive Penetrating Sealer - Chloride Screening Applications: National 

Cooperative Highway Research Report 244 (1981), “Concrete Sealers for 

the Protection of Bridge Structures”.

 [Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(q) Reactive Penetrating Sealer Water Repellency: ASTM C67-07, “Standard 

Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile”; 

or ASTM C97-02, “Standard Test Methods for Absorption and Bulk 

Specific Gravity of Dimension Stone”; or ASTM C140-06, “Standard Test 

Methods for Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related 

Units”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(r) Reactive Penetrating Sealer Water Vapor Transmission: ASTM

E96/E96M-05, “Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission of 

Materials”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)] 

(s) Stone Consolidants: ASTM E2167-01, “Standard Guide for Selection and 

Use of Stone Consolidants”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(tg) Surface Chalkiness: The chalkiness of a surface shall be determined using 

ASTM Designation D 4214-98, “Standard Test Methods for Evaluating 

the Degree of Chalking of Exterior Paint Films”.

(u) Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Abrasion Resistance: ASTM D 4060-07, 

“Standard Test Methods for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by 

the Taber Abraser”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(v) Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Adhesion: ASTM D 4585-99, “Standard 

Practice for Testing Water Resistance of Coatings Using Controlled 

Condensation” and ASTM D3359-02, “Standard Test Methods for 
1113-36 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test” (see Section (B), Tub and Tile 

Refinish Coating

(w) Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Hardness: ASTM D 3363-05, “Standard 

Test Method for Film Hardness by Pencil Test”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(x) Tub and Tile Refinish Coating Water Resistance: ASTM D 4585-99, 

“Standard Practice for Testing Water Resistance of Coatings Using 

Controlled Condensation” and ASTM D714-02e1, “Standard Test Method 

for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints”. 

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

(yk) VOC Content of Coatings: The VOC Ccontent of a Ccoating shall be 

determined by U.S. EPA Method 24 as it exists in appendix A of 40 Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 60, “Determination of Volatile Matter 

Content, Water Content, Density, Volume Solids, and Weight Solids of 

Surface Coatings”.

 [Capitalize defined words]

(z) Waterproofing Membrane: ASTM C836-06, “Standard Specification for 

High Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing 

Membrane for Use with Separate Wearing Course”.

[Added to support definition added in Section (B)]

[Test Methods added from SCM – test methods not in SCM deleted, capitalize 

defined words, test methods alphabetized,]

[SIP: See SIP Table at 

http://www.mdaqmd.ca.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=45 Submitted as 

amended 02/24/03 on ______; Submitted as amended 11/2/92 on 1/11/93; Approved: 6/9/82, 47 

FR 25013, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(51)(xii)(B)] 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-37

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

Table 1 

VOC CONTENT LIMITS FOR ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS

Limits are expressed in grams of VOC per litera of Ccoating thinned to the manufacturer’s maximum 

recommendation, excluding the volume of any water, Eexempt Ccompounds, or Ccolorant added to tint bases. 

“Manufacturer’s maximum recommendation” means the maximum recommendation for thinning that is indicated on 

the label or lid of the Ccoating container.

[Capitalize defined words]

Coating Category Effective 

February 24, 2003

Effective

May 24, 2003

Effective 1/1/2004

Flat Coatings 250 100

Nonflat Coatings 250 150

Nonflat-High Gloss Coatings 250 

Specialty Coatings 

Antenna Coatings 530

Antifouling Coatings 400

Bituminous Roof Coatings 300 

Bituminous Roof Primers 350b350

Bond Breakers 350 

Clear Wood Coatings

 Clear Brushing Lacquers

 Lacquers (including lacque sanding 

Ssealers)

 Sanding Sealers (other than lacquer sanding 

Ssealers)

 Varnishes

680

680

550

350

550

350

Concrete Curing Compounds 350 

Dry Fog Coatings 400 

Faux Finishing Coatings 350

Fire Resistive Coatings 350

Fire-Retardant Coatings:

 Clear

 Opaque

650

350

Floor Coatings 250

Flow Coatings 420

Form-Release Compounds 250

Graphic Arts Coatings (Sign Paints) 500 

High Temperature Coatings 550 420

Industrial Maintenance Coatings 420c250

Low Solids Coatingsd120

Magnesite Cement Coatings 600 450

Mastic Texture Coatings 300 

Metallic Pigmented Coatings 500 

Multi-Color Coatings 580 250

Pre-Treatment Wash Primers 780 420

Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 350 200

Quick-Dry Enamels 400 250

Quick-Dry Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 450 200

Recycled Coatings 250

Roof Coatings 300 250

Rust Preventative Coatings 400
1113-38 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

Coating Category Effective 

February 24, 2003

Effective

May 24, 2003

Effective 1/1/2004

Shellacs:

 Clear

 Opaque

730

550

Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 350 

Stains 350 250

Swimming Pool Coatings 650 340

Swimming Pool Repair and Maintenance 

Coatings

650 340

Temperature-Indicator Safety Coatings 550

Traffic Marking Coatings 250 150

Waterproofing Sealers 400 250

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealers 400 

Wood Preservatives 350e350

a. Conversion factor: one pound VOC per gallon (U.S.) = 119.95 grams VOC per liter.

b. Formerly listed as General Primer, Sealers & Undercoaters.

c. Except Anti-Grafitti coatings which have a limit of 600 g/ltr.

d. Units are grams of VOC per liter (pounds of VOC per gallon) of Ccoating, including water and Eexempt Ccompounds.

e. Except Below Ground Wood Preservatives which have a limit of 600 g/ltr.

[Table not up-to date]
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-39

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 
1113-40 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

Table 2

VOC CONTENT LIMITS FOR ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS

Effective January 1, 2013 the coating categories in Table 2 are eliminated and will be subject to 

the VOC limit of the applicable category in Table 1, except as provided in Section (C)(2), (C)(3), 

and (C)(5).

Limits are expressed in grams of VOC per litera of Coating thinned to the manufacturer’s maximum 

recommendation, excluding the volume of any water, Exempt Compounds, or Colorant added to tint bases. 

“Manufacturer’s maximum recommendation” means the maximum recommendation for thinning that is indicated on 

the label or lid of the Coating container.

Coating Category

Effective 

02/24/2003

Antenna Coatings 530

Antifouling Coatings 400

Clear Wood Coatings

 Clear Brushing Lacquers 680

 Lacquers (including lacquer sanding sealers) 550

 Sanding Sealers (other than lacquer sanding 

sealers) 350

 Varnishes 350

Fire-Retardant Coatings:

 Clear 650

 Opaque 350

Flow Coatings 420

Quick-Dry Enamels 250

Quick-Dry Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters 200

Swimming Pool Repair and Maintenance Coatings 340

Temperature-Indicator Safety Coatings 550

Waterproofing Sealers 250

Waterproofing Concrete/Masonry Sealers 400

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-A1

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

APPENDIX A:

AVERAGING PROVISION

Averaging Provision

(I) The manufacturer shall demonstrate that actual emissions from the Ccoatings being averaged are 

less than or equal to the allowable emissions, for the specified compliance period using the 

following equation:

∑ ≤

n

i = 1

GiMi

∑

n

i =1

GiViLi

Where:

∑ =

n

i =1

GiMi Actual Emissions

∑ =

n

i =1

GiViLi AllowableEmissions

Gi = Total Gallons of Product (i) subject to Averaging;

Mi = Material VOC Content of Product (i), in pounds per gallon;

Vi = Percent by Volume Solids and VOC in Product(i);

Where: Ws, Ww, Wec, Vm, Vw, and Vec are defined in subsection (F)(1), except that in 

this Appendix weights are in pounds and volumes are in gallons.

For Non-Zero VOC Coatings:

For Zero VOC Coatings:

Vi = Percent Solids by Volume

Li = Regulatory VOC Content Limit for Product(i) in pounds per gallon (as listed 

in Table 1

Vm

Vm Vw Vec Vi − −

=

Coating VOC ( also known as VOC Regulatory ) 

Material VOC ( also known as VOC Actual) Vi =

Vm

Ws Ww Wec Mi − −

=

Vm - Vw - Vec

Ws - Ww - Wec Where : Coating VOC =
1113-A2 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

The averaging is limited to Ccoatings that are designated by the manufacturer. Any 

Ccoating not designated in the averaging Program shall comply with the VOC limit in 

Table 1. The manufacturer shall not include any quantity of Ccoatings that it knows or 

should have known will not be used in the State, if statewide Ccoatings data are used. If 

Ddistrict-specific Ccoatings data are used, the manufacturer shall not include any 

quantity of Ccoatings that it knows or should have known will not be used in the 

Ddistrict.

(A) In addition to the requirements specified in subsection (I), manufacturers shall 

not include in an Averaging Program any Ccoating with a VOC Ccontent in 

excess of the following maximum VOC Ccontents, for the applicable categories. 

Averaging Category VOC Limit (Li)1

grams/liter

Maximum

VOC Content

grams/liter

Flat 100 250

Nonflat 150 250

Floor 250 400

Industrial Maintenance 250 420

Primer, Sealer, Undercoater 200 350

Quick Dry Primer, Sealer, 

Undercoater 200 450

Quick Dry Enamel 250 400

Roof 250 250

Bituminous Roof 300 300

Rust Preventative 400 400

Stains 250 350

Waterproofing Ssealers 250 400

1. As listed in Table 1. Used when determining allowable emissions in 

subsection (I).

(II) AVERAGING PROGRAM (PROGRAM)

At least six months prior to the start of the compliance period, manufacturers shall submit an 

Averaging Program to CARB. Averaging may not be implemented until the Program is approved 

in writing by CARB.

Within 45 days of submittal of a complete Program, CARB shall either approve or disapprove the 

Program. The Program applicant and CARB may agree to an extension of time for CARB to take 

action on the Program.

(III) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The Program shall include all necessary information for CARB to make a determination as to 

whether the manufacturer may comply with the averaging requirements over the specified 

compliance period in an enforceable manner. Such information shall include, but is not limited 

to, the following:

(A) An identification of the contact persons, telephone numbers, and name of the 

manufacturer who is submitting the Program.
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-A3

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(B) An identification of each Ccoating that has been selected by the manufacturer for 

inclusion in this program that exceeds the applicable VOC limit in Table 1, its VOC 

Ccontent specified in units of both VOC actual and VOC regulatory, and the designation 

of the Ccoating category.

(C) A detailed demonstration showing that the projected actual emissions will not exceed the 

allowable emissions for a single compliance period that the Program will be in effect. In 

addition, the demonstration shall include VOC Ccontent information for each Ccoating 

that is below the compliance limit in Table 1. The demonstration shall use the equation 

specified in subsection A.1 of this Appendix for projecting the actual emissions and 

allowable emissions during each compliance period. The demonstration shall also 

include all VOC Ccontent levels and projected volume sold within the State for each 

Ccoating listed in the Program during each compliance period. The requested data can be 

summarized in a matrix form.

(D) A specification of the compliance period(s) and applicable reporting dates. The length of 

the compliance period shall not be more than one year or less than six months.

 (E) An identification and description of all records to be made available to CARB upon 

request, if different than those identified under subsection (III)(F).

(F) An identification and description of specific records to be used in calculating emissions 

for the Program and subsequent reporting, and a detailed explanation as to how those 

records will be used by the manufacturer to verify compliance with the averaging 

requirements.

(G) A statement, signed by a responsible party for the manufacturer, that all information 

submitted is true and correct, and that records will be made available to CARB upon 

request.

(IV) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

(A) For every single compliance period, the manufacturer shall submit a mid-term report 

listing all Ccoatings subject to averaging during the first half of the compliance period, 

detailed analysis of the actual and allowable emissions at the end of the mid-term, and an 

explanation as to how the manufacturer intends to achieve compliance by the end of the 

compliance period. The report shall be signed by the responsible party for the 

manufacturer, attesting that all information submitted is true and correct. The mid-term 

report shall be submitted within 45 days after the midway date of the compliance period. 

A manufacturer may request, in writing, an extension of up to 15 days for submittal of the 

mid-term report.

(B) Within 60 days after the end of the compliance period or upon termination of the 

Program, whichever is sooner, the manufacturer shall submit to CARB a report listing all 

Ccoatings subject to averaging during the compliance period, providing a detailed 

demonstration of the balance between the actual and allowable emissions for the 

compliance period, any identification and description of specific records used by the 

manufacturer to verify compliance with the averaging requirement, and any other 

information requested by CARB to determine whether the manufacturer complied with 

the averaging requirements over the specified compliance period. The report shall be 
1113-A4 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

signed by the responsible party for the manufacturer, attesting that all information

submitted is true and correct, and that records will be made available to CARB upon 

request. A manufacturer may request, in writing, an extension of up to 30 days for 

submittal of the final report.

(V) RENEWAL OF A PROGRAM

A Program automatically expires at the end of the compliance period. The manufacturer may 

request a renewal of the Program by submitting a renewal request that shall include an updated 

Program, meeting all applicable Program requirements. The renewal request will be considered 

conditionally approved until CARB makes a final decision to deny or approve the renewal request 

based on a determination of whether the manufacturer is likely to comply with the averaging 

requirements. CARB shall base such determination on all available information, including but 

not limited to, the mid-term and the final reports of the preceding compliance period. The 

Executive Officer shall make a decision to deny or approve a renewal request no later than 45 

days from the date of the final report submittal, unless the manufacturer and CARB agree to an 

extension of time for CARB to take action on the renewal request.

(VI) MODIFICATION OF A PROGRAM

A manufacturer may request a modification of the Program at any time prior to the end of the 

compliance period. CARB shall take action to approve or disapprove the modification request no 

longer than 45 days from the date of its submittal. No modification of the compliance period 

shall be allowed. A Program need not be modified to specify additional Ccoatings to be averaged 

that are below the applicable VOC limits.

(VII) TERMINATION OF A PROGRAM

(A) A manufacturer may terminate its Program at any time by filing a written notification to 

CARB. The filing date shall be considered the effective date of the termination, and all 

other provisions of this rule including the VOC limits shall immediately thereafter apply. 

The manufacturer shall also submit a final report 60 days after the termination date. Any 

exceedance of the actual emissions over the allowable emissions over the period that the 

Program was in effect shall constitute a separate violation for each day of the entire 

compliance period.

(B) CARB may terminate a Program if any of the following circumstances occur:

(1) The manufacturer violates the requirements of the approved Program, and at the 

end of the compliance period, the actual emissions exceed the allowable 

emissions.

(2) The manufacturer demonstrates a recurring pattern of violations and has 

consistently failed to take the necessary steps to correct those violations.
MDAQMD Rule 1113 1113-A5

Architectural Coatings 

d5, 02/27/2012 

(VIII) CHANGE IN VOC LIMITS

If the VOC limits of a Ccoating listed in the Program are amended such that its effective date is 

less than one year from the date of adoption, the affected manufacturer may base its averaging on 

the prior limits of that Ccoating until the end of the compliance period immediately following the 

date of adoption.

(IX) LABELING

Each container of any Ccoating that is included in averaging program, and that exceeds the 

applicable VOC limit in Table 1 shall display the following statement: "This product is subject to 

Aarchitectural Ccoatings averaging provisions in California.” A symbol specified by CARB may 

be used as a substitute.

(X) VIOLATIONS

The exceedance of the allowable emissions for any compliance period shall constitute a separate 

violation for each day of the compliance period. However, any violation of the requirements of 

the Averaging Provision of this rule, which the violator can demonstrate, to CARB, did not cause 

or allow the emission of an air contaminant and was not the result of negligent or knowing 

activity may be considered a minor violation.

(XI) SUNSET OF AVERAGING PROVISION

The averaging provision set forth in Appendix A shall cease to be effective on January 1, 2005, 

after which averaging will no longer be allowed.

[Averaging Program no longer active]
1113-A6 MDAQMD Rule 1113

Architectural Coatings

d5, 02/27/2012 

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 B-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Appendix “B” 

Public Notice Documents 

1. Proof of Publication – Daily Press 

2. Proof of Publication – Riverside Press Enterprise 
B-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 B-3

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
B-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Appendix “C” 

Public Comments and Responses 

1. Email attachment from Nancy Adams, California Air Resources Board, 

2. Letter from Daniel B. Pourreau, Ph.D., Lyondell Chemical Company, 08/27/2011 

3. Email attachment from Robert Wendoll, DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION, 

09/12/2011 

4. Email attachment from David Darling, P.E., American Coatings Association, 09/12/11 

5. Email attachment from Patrick Au, California Air Resources Board, 09/30/2011 

6. Email attachment from David Darling, P.E., American Coatings Association 01/25/2012 

and email attachment from David Darling, P.E., American Coatings Association 

01/26/2012. 

7. Email attachment from Patrick Au, California Air Resources Board, 02/03/12 

8. Email attachment from David Darling, P.E., American Coatings Association, 02/08/12. 

9. Email attachment from Andrew Steckel, United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region IX, 02/16/2012. 
C-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-3

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 

2 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-5

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-6 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

3 

4 

5 

6 

7
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-7

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

8 

9 

10 

11 
C-8 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

12 

13 

14 

15 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-9

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 1 

Comment letter 1 was received prior to public comment period. 

1. “Applicability: Except as provided in subsection (A)(1)(3)...”has been modified to read 

subsection (A)(3). 

2. All definitions listed have been modified, updated, corrected or deleted as suggested. 

3. Section (C)(1)(a) Requirements has been updated to replace work “sale” with word “use” 

and (C)(6)(a)-(b) have been correctly numbered. 

4. Section (D)(1)(d), effective date for labeling requirements for all clear topcoat Faux 

Finishing Coatings changed from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2013, which is set to 

approximately one year from date of adoption. Additionally, “Coating” was changed to 

“coatings” for correct plural tense. 

5. Wording in Section (D)(1)(e)(i), labeling requirements for Industrial Maintenance 

Coatings, was removed that was not present in other labeling requirements. “Not for 

Residential use” or “Not intended for Residential use” was not stricken as suggested to be 

consistent with other districts. 

6. Past effective date of May 24, 2003 in Section (D)(1)(f) and (D)(1)(j) was removed. 

However, past effective date was not replaced with effective one year from date of 

adoption as was suggested. Rather effective date was removed altogether and labeling 

requirements for (D)(1)(f) and (D)(1)(j) now read, “The labels of all.....”. 

7. Sections (D)(1)(k)(x) and (D)(1)(l)(x) corrected to (D)(1)(k)(i) and (D)(1)(l)(i). 

8. Reporting Requirements of TBAc as exempt as a VOC was changed from referencing 

only Industrial Maintenance Coatings to “when determining VOC content of a coating 

and compliance with emission limitations”. 

9. Section (G)(1)(ii) was reduced to only consider Low Solids Coatings and not Low Solids 

Coatings Stains and low solids wood preservatives. 

10. Section (G)(2)(c) was updated to reference BAAQMD Method 41 and 43; additionally 

these methods were included in Section (G)(5). 

11. Section (G)(5) test methods included a number of updates: “pigment” was substituted for 

“metallic”, Basement Specialty Coatings and Metallic Pigmented Coating test methods 

were found to be redundant and deleted, Gonioapparent test method was deleted as the 

definition was deleted (see comment 2), corrections were made to reference correct 

subsections, correction was made to reference correct method revision date, correction 

made to reference correct ASTM number, and miscellaneous text removed. 

12. Driveway Sealers category was added to Table 1 with a VOC content limit of 50 g/l. 

13. Indication that Flow Coatings has been combined with other categories in Table 1 is no 

longer needed as subsequent comments lead to Table 2 being created, Table 2 contains all 

categories that are deleted or combined as of January 1, 2013. 

14. Reactive Penetrating Sealers category was added to Table 1 with a VOC content limit of 

350 g/l. 

15. Effective date of January 1, 2013 (approximately one year from date of adoption) has 

been set for new VOC limits. 
C-10 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-11

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 2 

1. Definition of Volatile Organic Compound was amended as requested and now references 

40CFR51.100(s). 
C-12 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-13

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-14 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-15

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

2 

3 
C-16 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

4 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-17

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 3 

1. To provide a “transition mechanism” as requested, Table 2 has been added. Table 2 

contains all categories which have been eliminated or combined with other categories. 

The categories in Table 2 can be sold (for up to three years) and/or used under the rule’s 

“sell-through” provision. 

2. Sell-Though provisions in Section (C)(5)(a) and Section (C)(5)(b) have been combined 

such that “so long as the Coating complied with the standards in effect at the time the 

Coating was manufactured” and “this subsection does not apply to any Coatings that does 

not display the date or date-code required by subsection (D)(1)(a)” pertains to both. 

3. Section (D)(g)(ii) has been added and includes the definition of excessively chalky 

surfaces and, “Until January 1, 2013, the labels of all Specialty Primers, Sealers, and 

Undercoaters may display ‘For excessively chalky substrates’ instead of, or in 

conjunction with, one or more of the descriptions listed in Section (D)(1)(g)(i) above”. 

4. Effective date of January 1, 2013 has been set as requested for new requirements. 

 
C-18 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-19

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 

2 
C-20 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

3
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-21

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

5 

4 
C-22 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

6 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-23

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

7 

8 

9 

10

0
C-24 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

11

0

12 

13

0
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-25

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

14

0

15

0
C-26 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

16

0

17

0
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-27

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

 District response to Comment Letter 4 

1. Implementation date of 1/1/2013 has been set. 

2. Table 2, which contains all the categories that are eliminated effective January 1, 

2013, has been added. All categories noted in the comment were included with the 

exception of “primer” and “sealer” which were not categories previously and which 

did not contain VOC limits in prior amendments of Rule 1113. 

3. Section B, definitions for “Exempt Compound” and “Volatile Organic Compound 

(VOC)” were updated to reference, “and those compounds listed in 40 CFR 

51.100(s)”. 

4. VOC Content has been changed to VOC Regulatory and VOC Contentls has been 

changed to VOC Actual to reflect language found in SCM. Section (B), definitions 

has been updated to include the more extensive definition as provided in both the 

SCM and the comment. 

5. The word “exclusively” has been removed from the definition in Section (B) for 

“Roof Coating”. 

6. A table was created under Section (C)(2) Most Restrictive VOC Limit that allows for 

the following categories to be excluded from “Most Restrictive VOC Limit” until 

01/01/2013: Antenna Coatings, Anitfouling Coatings, Flow Coatings, Fire-retardant 

Coatings, Lacquer Coatings, and Temperature indicator safety Coatings 

7. Section (C)(3) has not been deleted. The District does not find Section (C)(3) to be 

identical to Section (C)(8) as suggested. Section (C)(8) has, however been moved 

and is now Section (C)(3)(b) for clarity. 

8. Sell-Though provisions in Section (C)(5)(a) and Section (C)(5)(b) have been 

combined such that the verbiage “so long as the Coating complied with the standards 

in effect at the time the Coating was manufactured” and “this subsection does not 

apply to any Coatings that does not display the date or date-code required by 

subsection (D)(1)(a) pertains to both. 

9. Sell-Through of Coatings for Rust Preventative Coatings remains in Rule; however 

this section only remains effective until January 1, 2012. 

10. Early Compliance Provision added to Section (C) for clarity that a coating meeting 

the January 1, 2013 standards prior to January 1, 2013 is in compliance so long that 

the coating complies with most restrictive VOC limit and labeling requirements. 

11. “Or importer” has been removed from Section (D)(1) Container Labeling 

Requirements. 

12. No change. Similar language can be found in Sections (D)(1)(c) and (G). 

13. Labeling requirements for Clear Brushing Lacquers and Quick Dry Enamels have 

been left in rule. Additional language that category is eliminated as of January 1, 

2013 has been added. 

14. Added to Specialty Primers, Sealers, and Undercoaters suggested definition and 

labeling requirements. Also, see District Response 3 to Comment Letter 3. 

15. Added “For Industrial Use Only” and “Not for residential use” or “Not Intended for 

residential use” into labeling requirements for Zinc Rich Primers. 

16. For clarity and consistency with other District Rules, District Rule 442 Applicability 

has been retained. 
C-28 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

17. Two tables have been created as suggested. Table 1 reflects new categories and/or 

new VOC limits as of January 1, 2013. Table 2 contains those categories, and their 

respective VOC limits, that have been eliminated or combined to create a new 

category as of January 1, 2013. Additionally, Basement Specialty Coatings with a 

VOC limit of 400 g/l has been added to Table 1. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-29

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-30 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-31

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 
C-32 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 5 

1. Basement Specialty Coatings was added to Table 1 with a volatile organic compound 

limit of 400 g/l. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-33

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-34 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-35

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

2 

3 

4 
C-36 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

5 

6 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-37

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

7 
C-38 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

5 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-39

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 6 

1. VOC Content Limits, Section (C)(1)(a)(ii) was updated to read, “Supply, sell, or offer for 

sale for use within the District; or” and Section (C)(1)(a)(iii) was updated to include 

reference to Table 2. 

2. Table of Coating categories for which the Most Restrictive VOC Limit does not apply, in 

Section (C)(2)(a) updated to reflect “Applicable Only to Coatings Manufactured Before 

1/1/2013”. 

3. Section (C)(4)(a) was updated to include reference to Section (C)(5) Sell Through of 

Coatings. 

4. To maintain consistency with previous versions of the rule, the District retains Section 

(D)(1)(c) as written. After verbal comment from CARB on 02/06/2012, the District has 

agreed to change the language in Section (D)(1)(c) to be consistent with the SCM. 

5. Removed the word “all” from Section (D)(1)(h)(ii) as suggested. 

6. Section (F)(1), District Rule 442 Applicability remains to include “Coatings”. Rule 1113 

exclusions include Coatings sold in a container with a volume of one (1) liter (1.057 

quart) or less – Coatings falling under this Rule 1113 exclusion will still be subject to 

Rule 442. 

7. Table 2 – Table of Eliminated Categories was updated to reflect “expect as provided in 

Section (C)(5)” as suggested. 
C-40 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
MDAQMD Rule 1113 

C-41

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
C-42 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 7 

1. No response required. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-43

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

1 
C-44 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 8 

1. Reference to Sections (C)(2) and (C)(3) was added to Table 2 for consistency with 

subsection (C)(4). 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 C-45

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

2 

3 

1 

4 
C-46 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

District response to Comment Letter 9 

1. In Section (C)(1)(a)(iii), recommended text was moved to a separate paragraph to clarify 

that wording is applicable to Sections (C)(1)(a)(i) and (C)(1)(a)(ii) as well. 

2. Recommended sections were added previously per Comment Letter 6. 

3. In Section (G)(1)(a) two sentences were added along with an effective date of January 1, 

2013 for consistency with Section (D)(1)(c). 

4. Test method for “Acid Content of Coatings” was re-inserted. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 D-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Appendix “D” 

California Environmental Quality Act 

Documentation 

1. Notice of Exemption, San Bernardino County, Posted 5/4/12 

2. Notice of Exemption, Riverside County, Posted 5/7/12 
D-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

This page intentionally left blank. 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 D-3

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012
D-4 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

 
MDAQMD Rule 1113 E-1

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

Appendix “E” 

Bibliography

The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this staff report. 

The following documents were consulted in the preparation of this staff report and the proposed 

amendments to Rule 1113. 

Statutes and Regulations

40 CFR 52 – National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural 

Coatings. 

17 Cal. Code Regs. §§94520 et seq. – Aerosol Coating Products. 

California Air Resources Board

Staff Report for Proposed Amendments to the Suggested Control Measure for Architectural 

Coatings (9/2007) 

Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (Adopted 6/22/2000) 

Suggested Control Measure for Architectural Coatings (Adopted 10/26/2007) 

Final Program Environmental Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for Architectural 

Coatings (SCH No 99062093, 06/2000) 

Initial Study for Draft Environmental Impact Report for a Suggested Control Measure for 

Architectural Coatings (06/1999) 

Local Air Districts

Rule 8-3 – Architectural Coatings (Bay Area Air Quality Management District, amended 

7/1/2009) 

Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings (South Coast Air Quality Management District, amended 

6/3/2011) 

Rule 4601 – Architectural Coatings (San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 

amended 12/17/2009) 

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Air Division

Technical Support Document for EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the California SIP 

MDAQMD Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings (June 2003) 
E-2 MDAQMD Rule 1113 

Final Staff Report, 09/21/2012

This page intentionally left blank.