alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 23, 2001

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-8597

JOHN B. O’NEAL., III,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

JEANETTE G. GARRISON; et al.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Georgia

(October 23, 2001)

 PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

Before BARKETT, GODBOLD and GOODWIN*, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

_______________________

*Honorable Alfred T. Goodwin, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

The petition for rehearing by Christopher Garrison correctly notes that he
2

was not named as a defendant in Count I of the second amended complaint. Our

opinion is amended accordingly.

Our opinion referred to summary judgment granted to Molloy. In fact, the

district court denied Molloy’s motion for summary judgment, but at the conclusion

of trial testimony it granted judgment as a matter of law for Molloy on Count V,

the tortious interference claim, and it dismissed the Count V claim against

Healthmaster, Molloy’s employer, whose only exposure was derivative of

Molloy’s exposure. Our opinion is amended to show that the order granted to

Molloy was judgment as a matter of law on Count V.

The petition for rehearing filed by Molloy and Healthmaster, Inc. asserts

that, in view of the court’s ruling on Count V, it erred in not dismissing the Count I

and Count III claims against them. The petition is DENIED. 

Appellant John B. O’Neal has filed an “opposition” to the petitions for

rehearing filed by Molloy and Healthmaster, Inc., in which he contends that the

court erred in granting judgment for Molloy on Count V. We treat this as a

petition for rehearing on that point, and it is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 5, 2006 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  Pomeroy  IT  Solutions,  Inc.


          November 14, 2006             /s/  Kevin G. Gregory
                                        -------------------------
                                        Kevin G. Gregory
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EX PARTE D.L.G.

(In re: The matter of D.S., a minor child)

2160653

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  following Financial Data Schedule contains standard data for the Six Months
Ended  July  5,  1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-05-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-06-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-05-1999
<CASH>                                        5146
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               178209
<ALLOWANCES>                                  1097
<INVENTORY>                                  38249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            224867
<PP&E>                                       24356
<DEPRECIATION>                               11373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              277123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       148992
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  123916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                277123
<SALES>                                     350772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            350772
<CGS>                                       304205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               304205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                46
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              17781
<INCOME-TAX>                                  7033
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          10748
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 10748
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .91

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.7


PEOPLES BANCORP INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018


SUMMARY OF BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
OF PEOPLES BANCORP INC.


The base salaries of executive officers of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (“Peoples”) are determined by evaluating the most recent comparative peer data and the role and responsibilities of their positions.  Individual salary increases are reviewed annually and are based on Peoples' overall performance and the executive's attainment of specific individual business objectives during the preceding year.


The following table details the base salaries to be paid by Peoples and its subsidiaries to Charles W. Sulerzyski, President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples, and the four other most highly compensated executive officers of Peoples for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018: 


	
					
	Name
	Position/Title
	Base Salary

	Charles W. Sulerzyski
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	600,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	John C. Rogers
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	321,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Doug Wyatt
	Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Banking Officer
	265,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Carol A. Schneeberger
	Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
	265,000
	


	 
	 
	 

	Robyn A. Stevens
	Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer
	240,000
CMF

2-furancarboxyaldehyde, 5-(chloromethyl)-

CAS# 75-09-2
Clarence Eugene FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2990

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

Charles G. White of Charles G. White, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
#### JOHNSON v. DEMMERT PACKING CO.

No. 3468-A.

First Division. Juneau.

Dec. 11, 1933.

*453Frank Foster, of Juneau, for plaintiff.

W. L. Paul, of Juneau, for defendant.

ALEXANDER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to set aside the service and quash the summons therein; it being contended by the defendants that the service of summons should be set aside and the summons quashed for the reasons:

First. That the copy of the summons delivered to the defendants was not certified by the plaintiff, his agent or his attorney, or at all.

Second. That the. original summons was not read or shown to the defendants or any one of them as required by law.

Our statute, section 878, C.L.A., as amended by chapter 21, Laws of 1933, provides that summons shall be served by delivering a copy thereof, together with a copy of the complaint prepared and certified by the plaintiff, his agent or attorney, or by the clerk of the court.

This statute was taken verbatim frorfi the Oregon statute, and it, in turn, from the New York Code.

The answer to defendants’ first objection is found in the officer’s return on the summons. The service was made by a deputy marshal, and follows exactly the wording of the statute.

Defendant, however, contends that the copy of the summons delivered to defendants was not certified by plaintiff, his agent or attorney, or at all.

The answer to that is that the officer’s return shows that the service was made in compliance with the statute and follows the wording of the statute. Even the comma after the word “complaint” and before the word “prepared,” as *454used in the wording of the statute, and spoken of in Cole v. Rustgard, to which the court’s attention is called, is present in 'the officer’s return here, which, grammatically construed, means that both the summons and complaint were certified by Frank H. Foster, plaintiff’s attorney, and covers even the defect sought to be raised in Cole v. Rustgard, and, since the officer’s return must be taken as true, in the absence of any showing to the contrary, there is no merit in defendants’ contention, even though it is necessary, which we do not here decide, that the summons be certified.

There is no merit in defendants’ second contention, “That the original summons was not read or shown to the defendants or to any one of them, as required by law,” as there is no law that makes such requirement.

Defendants’ motion is therefore denied, and defendants given twenty days in which to answer or further plead herein.
ms-iH

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 01-13-00907-CR OFFENSE: 22.01 (Assault)

Randy Mazuera v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: Co Crim Ct at Law No 1

DATE: 09/25/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1870669

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Randy Mazuera v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

APPZUAUT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

*R€FMfh

DATE: oT-lovJw/r

JUDGE: {mCU/U^^l^

CCA#: MS&'l*

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 22, 2020

Order 

Clerk

July 22, 2020

160339(129)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

SC: 160339

v COA: 327491 

Wayne CC: 14-004600-FH 

DARRELL WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL 

JOHN WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL J. WILDER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed 

if submitted on or before September 7, 2020.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

s0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137650 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137650 

 COA: 279515 

Wayne CC: 07-006716-01 

MALCOLM WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Jonathan Nedabiah GOODRICH, Appellant, v. DOMANI MOTOR CARS, INC., a Florida corporation, and Kevin M. Eastwood d/b/a Executive Motor Works of Boca Raton, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2679

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 5, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit











May 31, 2018 


Maeve O’Meara 


Dear Maeve, 


Thank you for your continued commitment and contributions to Castlight. I am pleased to inform you that you have been promoted to the position of Executive Vice President, Products and Customer Experience reporting to me, effective June 11, 2018. Upon the effective date, your annual base salary will increase to $375,000, less applicable withholdings. This represents an increase of 7.1%. This increase will appear in your June 30, 2018 paycheck. Your annual target bonus increases from 50% to 60% of your base salary. 


In recognition of your promotion, you have been awarded 200,000 restricted stock units, to acquire shares of Company Class B Common Stock ("RSUs") under its 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (Plan). This grant vests in equal quarterly installments over a period of four years. Your first vesting will be August 16, 2018. Further details will be provided when the grant is issued to you. 


In your new role, you will be a Section 16 Officer. Also, with this promotion, you will be eligible for the EVP tier benefits as detailed in the Castlight Health Executive Severance Agreement. 


Please sign this letter accepting and return the signed letter to Paul Stearns. 


Thank you again for your efforts at Castlight. We truly appreciate your dedication to the one team on a mission making things happen. 


Congratulations! 


John Doyle
/s/ John Doyle 


Accepted: 




	
		
	/s/ Maeve O'Meara
	2/21/2019

	Maeve O'Meara
	Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 for Hallwood Consolidated Resources 
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000883953
<NAME>                        Hallwood Consolidated Resources Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         372
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,717
<PP&E>                                         292,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,233
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       30
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,416
<SALES>                                        23,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,664
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                   575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.80
        


</TABLE>
Donald Lee TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0377

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Roberts, and Jay, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2011
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  /s/ Jack H. BrownJack H. BrownChairman, President, and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)May 10, 2011/s/ Phillip J. SmithPhillip J. SmithExecutive Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)May 10, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Ju dge Annunziata

IFTIKHAR H. SAIYED MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0761-10-4 PER CURIAM DECEMBER 21, 2010 VIRGINIA EMPLOYM ENT COMMISSION

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Donald M. Haddock, Judge (Iftikhar H. Saiyed, pro se , on brief). No brief for appellee.

Iftikhar H. Saiyed appeals a decision of the Ci rcuit Court of the City of Alexandria (trial court) finding he was not enti tled to unemployment compensation benefits from October 26, 2008, to January 3, 2009. We have reviewed the record, the circuit court’s order, and the Virginia Employment Commission’s (VEC) opinion. We find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the VEC in its final opinion and affirmed by the

circuit court. See In Re Iftikhar H. Saiyed , Decision No. 87349-C (June 15, 2009); Saiyed v. Va. Emp’t Comm’n , Case No. CL09003072 (Mar. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR22-24-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Power and Light Company.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): WPL 
Statement of Operating Conditions Update to be effective 2/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 2/4/2022.
    Accession Number: 20220204-5111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/25/22.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/5/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-540-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TETLP Interim ASA Compliance 
Filing to be effective 3/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 2/7/22.
    Accession Number: 20220207-5210.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/22/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-395-001.
    Applicants: East Cheyenne Gas Storage, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: East Cheyenne Tariff Correction 
Filing to be effective 1/6/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/28/22.
    Accession Number: 20220128-5380.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 8, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-03070 Filed 2-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Michael A. CELENTANO, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2902

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.