alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07186

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07186\07186_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07186\07186_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07186\07186_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07186\07186_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07186\07186_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07186\07186_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07186\07186_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07186\07186_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07186\Certification Statement Plant ID 07186.pdf Plant certification statement

07186\Supplemental Documents\07186_Aerial Map-1 Diagram- Alma Station for EPA 

Effluent Questio.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07186\Supplemental Documents\07186_Aerial Map-2 Diagram - Alma Station for EPA 

Effluent Questi.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x

07186\Supplemental Documents\07186_Email from EPA Re Effluent Guidelines 

Questionnaire Comple.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x

07186\Supplemental Documents\07186_Water Balance WB-1 Diagram for EPA Effluent 

Questionnaire P.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN ATKERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 282 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN ATKERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 283 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN ATKERSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 284 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4481

_____________________________
R AKESH P ATEL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

. August 14, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R OWE , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Rachael E. Reese of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa
, for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 46723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19668]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Jersey Advisory 
Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a planning meeting of the of 
the New Jersey Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights will convene at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, August 17, 2011 at the 
Legislative Annex, 125 West State Street, 1st Floor Annex, Committee 
Room 115, Trenton, New Jersey 08625. The purpose of the planning 
meeting is to review and discuss the draft report on services provided 
to persons with non-apparent disabilities who are incarcerated in New 
Jersey state prisons. The draft report was prepared by the subcommittee 
of the New Jersey Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil 
Rights.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, September 
16, 2011. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or e-mailed to ero@usccr.gov. 
Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or to present their comments 
verbally at the meeting, or who desire additional information should 
contact contact Ivy L. Davis, Director, Eastern Regional Office, at 
(202) 376-7533 (or for hearing impaired TDD 800-877-8339). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, July 29, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-19668 Filed 8-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


Subsidiaries
-------------



Marketware International, Inc.
National Investor Services Corp.
TD Waterhouse Advertising, Inc.
TD Waterhouse Asset Management, Inc.
TD Waterhouse Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd.
TD Waterhouse Investor Services Limited
TD Waterhouse Nominees Pty Ltd.
TD Waterhouse Pty Ltd.
Pont Nominees Pty Ltd.
Pont Securities Nominees No.2 Pty Ltd.
Green Line Nominees Pty Ltd.
TD Waterhouse Investor Services (Canada) Inc.
TD Waterhouse Investor Services (Hong Kong) Inc.
TD Waterhouse Investor Services (Hong Kong) Limited
TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.
TD Waterhouse Investor Services (UK) Limited
TD Waterhouse Investor Services (Europe) Limited
Share Exchange Limited
Sharemarket Limited
TD Waterhouse Nominees (Europe) Limited
TD Waterhouse Securities Services (Hong Kong) Limited
TD Waterhouse Sub Limited
#### Paulino AGUILERA-SANDOVAL, Petitioner-Appellant v. Warden PEARCE, Bastrop Federal Correctional Institution, Bastrop, Texas, Respondent-Appellee

No. 15-51124 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 29, 2017

Paulino Aguilera-Sandoval, Pro Se

Charles Kneeland Cooper, IV, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Paulino Aguilera-Sandoval, federal prisoner # 15963-078, appeals the district court’s denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) motion seeking reconsideration of the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application that challenged the execution of his sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. He contends that the district court erred in finding that the nearly two-year period between the issuance of a parole warrant in Texas and the revocation of his parole was credited against his state sentence for murder. According to Aguilera-Sandoval, the period should be credited against his federal sentence. We find no abuse of discretion, as the record supports the district court’s finding, and a prisoner is not entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for time credited against another sentence. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); *Hernandez v. Thaler,*630 F.3d 420, 428 (5th Cir. 2011); *Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.,*699 F.2d 693, 695 (5th Cir. 1983).

To the extent Aguilera-Sandoval contends in his reply brief that he is entitled to credit for the period even though it was credited against the state sentence, he waived the argument by failing to include it in his initial brief to this court. *See*
      *294
      *United States v. Jackson,*426 F.3d 301, 304 n.2 (5th Cir. 2005).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Noe MEJIA-CASTRO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40033 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 21, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Noe Mejia-Castro, Pro Se

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Noe Mejia-Castro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Mejia-Castro has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents np nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42,2.

*

 Pursuant to 5m Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Case numbers: 01-12-00106-CR

01-12-00107-CR

01-12-00108-CR

Style: Miguel Maldonado, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing filed November 19, 2012

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown. 

Date: February 26, 2013.
Ramone MCNEIL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Robin J. CARRIG, Appellant, v. Steven CARRIG, Michael Carrig and Suntrust Bank, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00088-CV

MARIA ROBLES, J.A., AND JOSE 

ALMAGUER VAZQUEZ, Appellants

V.

COX INSURANCE GROUP, LLC AND 

OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL,

Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 67th District Court

of Tarrant County (067-319936-20)

January 20, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellants Maria Robles, J.A., and Jose Almaguer 

Vazquez shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00289-CV

David Scot Lynd

v.

Lea Cox

§

§

§

§

From the Probate Court

of Denton County (PR-2011-00093)

August 25, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6294 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the set of individuals 

eligible to transfer Post-9/11 educational assistance to eligible dependents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2023 

Mr. CROW (for himself and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the set 

of individuals eligible to transfer Post-9/11 educational 

assistance to eligible dependents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Earned Edu5 cation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY TO TRANSFER POST-9/ 

7 11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO ELIGIBLE 

8 DEPENDENTS. 

9 Section 3319(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

10 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6294 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘member of the uniformed 

3 services’’ and inserting ‘‘individual’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘, has completed at least’’; 

5 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘has completed at least’’ 

7 before ‘‘six years’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘or’’; 

9 (3) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘has com10 pleted at least’’ before ‘‘the years’’; 

11 (4) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para12 graph (4); and 

13 (5) by inserting, after paragraph (1), the fol14 lowing new paragraphs: 

15 ‘‘(2) has completed at least 17 years of service 

16 in the Armed Forces; 

17 ‘‘(3) is retired from the Armed Forces under 

18 chapter 61 of title 10; or’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raonel ARROYO-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40532 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Raonel Arroyo-Cruz, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raonel Arroyo-Cruz has *928moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arroyo-Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *928published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Thomas J. Baldwin, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 17, 2004 |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               | /s/  THOMAS J. BALDWIN |   |
|               | Thomas  J. Baldwin |
|               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 82 5

. EDI SON v

. GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVI CES

DI VI SI ON OF CHI LD SUPPORT SERVI CES et a l

.

Th e ab o v e-s t y l ed ap p eal was d o ck et ed i n t h i s Co u rt o n J u l y 1 5

, 20 2 4. Pu rs u an t

t o Ru l e 2 3 (a) o f t h e Co u rt o f A p p e al s t he Ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef was t o b e fi l ed i n t h i s

Co u rt b y Au gu s t 5

, 2 02 4

. Th e A p p el l an t fai l ed to fi l e a m o t i o n fo r ex t en s i o n o f t i m e

o r a t i m el y b ri ef. In st ead

, t he Ap p el l an t fi l ed an u n t i m el y b ri ef o n Au g u st 1 9

, 2 0 2 4.

Th i s ap p eal is h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru les 1 6 (b ), 2 3 (a).

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. August 21, 2024

08/21/2024
D.E. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160451

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Timothy HADLEY v. STATE

CR-16-0303

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4231

___________

Timothy M. White, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States 

Robert T. Rogers, Deputy Public * District Court for the Western

Defender; Kenneth Elser, Deputy * District of Arkansas.

Prosecuting Attorney; David S. *

Clinger, Prosecuting Attorney; April * [UNPUBLISHED]

M. Rye, Assistant Prosecuting *

Attorney; Bill Mead, Police Officer, *

Green Forest, Arkansas; Jeff Webb, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 21, 2000

Filed: June 29, 2000 

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Timothy M. White appeals the district court's dismissal of White's 42 U.S.C. §

1983 action arising from his arrest and prosecution in 1994. Having reviewed the

record, we agree with the district court the defendant prosecutors were immune from
-2-

suit for monetary damages, see Brodnicki v. City of Omaha, 75 F.3d 1261, 1266-67

(8th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 867 (1966), and White's public defender was not a

state actor, see Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981). We also agree

White's action was time-barred. See ARK. CODE ANN. § 16-56-105 (Michie 1994)

(three-year statute of limitations); Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 280 (1985); O'Mara

v. Dykema, 942 S.W.2d 854, 858 (Ark. 1997). We affirm the district court. See 8th

Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBRANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CompuPrint, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Roman
Rozenberg, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Roman Rozenberg
-----------------------
Roman Rozenberg
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 31, 2006
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LADAE SAMAEL LANAERD FRANKLIN, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-213

LT Case No. 16-2020-CF-1962-AXXX

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed June 6, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County, 

Mark Borello, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender,

and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

and Robert Charles Lee, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

HARRIS, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
5

6789

10

entration  mg/L

S Concentration with non‐detects shown at half of ND valu

RockTenn Florence Mill 2009 through 2013 by month

Concentration (mg/L)Wt t Fl (MG

01234

1/1/2009

4/1/2009

7/1/2009

10/1/2009

1/1/2010

4/1/2010

7/1/2010

10/1/2010

1/1/2011

4/1/2011

7/1/2011

10/1/2011

1/1/2012

4/1/2012

7/1/2012

10/1/2012

1/1/2013

4/1/2013

7/1/2013

10/1/2013

ConceWastewater Flow (MG