alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
John R. POLGAR, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Theresa DEES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4027

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 14, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellee's motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for failing to comply with this court's April 24, 2018, order. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to serve the initial brief is denied as moot. Appellant's motion to withdraw objection is denied as moot.

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUKIM, JJ., Concur.
# NationalArchives andRecordsAdministration

----------------------------------~--



# Office of

# theFederalRegister

• January 4, 20I0 

### FAA SOO independence Avenue, SW Room 915 

### J,Regulations DivIsion Washington, DC 20.59] ATiN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register Dear Ms. Molitor: The material listed in the attachm_e~ll is approved for incorporation 

### byreference in 14 

### eFR Par! 39. This approval is contingemupon the final rule containing any language changes, wbJCh were agreed upon 

### by our 

### stark The approval to incorporate 

### byreference this publication(s) ]5effective on the effective dme of your 

### final ntlc. Ifyou wish toenforce some other edition ofthe publication(s) approved, you must: 1. Publish notice of the chimgc inthe Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and 2. Ensure that a copy of that edilion is on file allhc Office of the Federal Register; and 3. NOlify me in writing of the change. 

# / J 

# 1;~t1~ jiJ4~AYMOND A.MOSLEY Oiredor ofthe Federlll Register Federal Regisler

# Attomey/ff}j Attachment

uslnail address: 3601Adelphi Road, Cot1egePark, MD 20740-6001

Officelocation: 300North CapilolSlTeel, NW,Suite 700,\'I"ashington, DC 20002-4244 Fn1cr,li Regi~ler web sites: http://www_archiveS_f,ov/fICderaJ_rC'gister /Iud http://www.gpoacccs5.gov/nar'1

### illcorporation byReferellce Docket No. F.4.A-J007-0096: Dilw:rorate ldelliifier lOOI-NE-39-AD; Ameudmei1f 

### 39-16141: AD 2009-26-06
AlIiedSignal Service Bulletin (SB) ALFILF 73-1002 Revision 1 0312411997 

### Dock,,! No. F.4.A.-l007-176X7: Directorate ldem{{ier 1000-NE-41-AD: AmendmeJ1l 

### 39-16144: AD 1009-16-09

GE Aircraft Engines Service Builetin CF34 10/2712008 BJ SIB 72-A0234 GE Aircraft Engines Service Builetin CF34 10/27/2008 BJ SIB 72-A0235 GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- 10/27/2008 AL S/6 72 A0253 GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- Revision 4 10/27/2008 AL SIB 72-A0233 GE Aircraft Engines Service Bulletin CF34- 10/27/2008 AL SIB 72-A0252 GE Aircraft Engines Service Bullet\n CF34- Revision 4 1012712008 BJ SIB 72-A0212 

### Dockel No. FAA-1009-1122: Directorare ID2009-NM-153·AD: Amendment 39-16160: AD ]()08-IO-(}6 Ri
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Boeing Commercial Airplanes

t~dl1f('(f //4/1010 Section 9, Boeing 747- ReviSion Aprii 400 Maintenance 2008 Planning Data (MPDl Document D62U4oo-9 Section 9, Boeing 747- Revision March 400 Maintenance 2009 Planning Data (MPD) Document, D621U400-9 0412008

0312009

Pag'-Iofl
Jose MATEO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-623

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000884124
<NAME>                        GALEY & LORD, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-2-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-4-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-3-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                           9,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    181,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,893
<PP&E>                                         511,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 994,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,915
<BONDS>                                        665,484
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   994,345
<SALES>                                        483,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               483,468
<CGS>                                          433,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  433,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                       868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,264
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Kidney Precision Medicine Program (KPMP) Review.                    

*Date:*                         March 16-17, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health,  Room 7015, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721,                         *ryan.morris@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 7846)    
Dated: February 4, 2022. 

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-02777 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Jeffrey Bernard WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-1165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Stella Gomez SEITZ, a/k/a Stella, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Partridge et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0688

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
William Brian JAMES v. Jennifer Leona JAMES

2160119

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
D.E. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160447

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
H. R. 599 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3500 West 

6th Street, Suite 103 in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang 

Ho Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DOSAN AHN CHANG HO POST OFFICE REDESIGNATION. 

(a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 1 of Public Law 108–239 is 

amended by striking ‘‘3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California’’ and inserting ‘‘3500 West 6th Street, Suite 103 in Los 

Angeles, California’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in section 1 of Public Law 108–239 as amended by 

subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dosan 

Ahn Chang Ho Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         130,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,376
<PP&E>                                         183,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,552
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           950
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585,740
<SALES>                                        759,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               759,394
<CGS>                                          447,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,243,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,181
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (482,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (482,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (482,794)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.15)
        

</TABLE>
PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alfonso RODRIGUEZ, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1034

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 05, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial information extracted from SEC
     Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000883946
<NAME>                        TREEV INC
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,043)
<INVENTORY>                                        827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,806
<PP&E>                                           7,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,836)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,827
<SALES>                                         19,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,655
<CGS>                                           10,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,416)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certificate Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L.
Dick Buell, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ L. Dick BuellL. Dick BuellChief Executive Officerand Director (Principal Executive Officer)September 15, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ariel PANTOJA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-50541 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

*150Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Ariel Pantoja, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ariel Pantoja has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pantoja has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40272

Conference Calendar

__________________

DON WAYNE BASEY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LESLIE W. WOODS ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-20

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A district court may sua sponte dismiss an action for

failure to prosecute or to comply with any court order. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(b); McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th

Cir. 1988). A sua sponte dismissal by the district court

pursuant to Rule 41(b) must be upheld on appeal unless the court

determines that the district court abused its discretion in

choosing that sanction. McNeal v. Papasan, 842 F.2d 787, 789-90
No. 95-40272

-2-

(5th Cir. 1988). However, the scope of the district court's

discretion is narrow when a statute of limitations would bar

reprosecution of a suit dismissed without prejudice under Rule

41(b). Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, 975 F.2d 1188, 1190-91 (5th

Cir. 1992). As there is no federal statute of limitations for

§ 1983 actions, the federal courts borrow the forum state's

general personal injury limitations period, Henson-El v. Rogers,

923 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1235 (1991),

which in this case is two years. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code

Ann. § 16.003 (West 1994).

The district court dismissed Don Wayne Basey's action after

Basey did not comply with a previous district court order

directing Basey to obtain and send to the district court's

clerk's office certification of his inmate account balance for

determination of Basey's in forma pauperis status. The district

court had previously warned Basey that failure to comply with the

order would result in dismissal of Basey's action. The dismissal

was without prejudice.

Additionally, as Basey's claims were based on events which

occurred on or about November 1, 1994, or after that date, the

statute of limitations on Basey's claims will not run until

approximately November 1, 1996. The district court did not abuse

its discretion in dismissing Basey's action.

Basey's motions for production of documents, for admission

of policies into evidence, and to appear in appellate court are

DENIED as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED. MOTIONS DENIED.
#### Maricela RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melanie PARKER, M.D.; et. al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 16-35131

16-35367

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 4, 2017

Maricela Ramirez, Portland, OR, pro se.

Lindsey Harris Hughes, Keating Jones Hughes PC, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Maricela Ramirez appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion and her motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. *Pincay v. Andrews,*389 F.3d 853, 858 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal); *Sck Dist, No. U, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993) (motion for reconsideration under Rule 60). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez’s Rule 60 motions for reconsideration because Ramirez failed to demonstrate any basis for relief. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 5 F.3d*at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Rule 60(b)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez’s untimely motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal because Ramirez failed to demonstrate good cause or excusable neglect. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A) (district court may extend time for filing notice of appeal upon showing of good cause or excusable neglect);- *Pincay,*389 F.3d at 858-60 (discussing excusable neglect and explaining that this court must affirm unless there is a definite and firm conviction that the district court committed a clear error of judgment); *Ghazali v. Moran,*46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995) (“[P]ro se litigants are bound by the rules, of procedure.”).

We reject as without merit Ramirez’s contention that the district court discriminated against her on the basis of race.

We do not consider Ramirez’s contentions regarding the district court’s orders entered before January 25, 2016, because they are not within the scope of this appeal.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Cnossen Jerry EAS COST) mreeve@reevecorp.com Gulkana air service Monday, December 08, 2014

Dear Mr. Muldoon

I am a construction superintendent living in Tok and regularlytravel throughoutAlaska. Currently I must drive to Fairbanks orAnchorage to begin my airtravel. Regular service from Reeve AirAlaska will provide great service for Gulkana and other communities in the surrounding area.

I have flown with Reeve Airfor numerous years with nothing but positive experiences. Iam writing this to offer my support forthe Reeve Air Alaska proposal for Essential Air Service to the Gulkana airport.

Sincerely,

Jerry Cnossen ANTHC Superintendent 

### 907-782-5338 © jerry.cnossen@anthc.org