alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher J. Artinian, the Chief Executive Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.

Date: November 3, 2010





|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ARTINIAN                    
|                                               
|Christopher J. Artinian
Chief Executive Officer



29
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc. (“Morton’s”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Baldwin, the Chief Financial Officer of Morton’s, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Morton’s.

 

Date: August 15, 2005

 
|   | /s/ THOMAS J. BALDWIN   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas J. Baldwin       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       March 4, 2010 |   | Natural      Gas Services Group, Inc.                                                                                   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | By:    | /s/ Stephen      C. Taylor                                                                                              |   |
|                           |   | Stephen      C. Taylor                                                                                                       |   |
|                           |   | Chairman      of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer      (Principal  Executive Officer) |   |
Davidson & Company
Chartered Accountants
A Partnership of Incorporated Professionals























INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT









We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 on July 11, 2000 (SEC No. 333-41128) of our report dated April 24, 2002 on our audit of the financial statements of Kidstoysplus.com, Inc. as of January 31, 2002, which report is included in the Annual Report of Form 10-KSB of Kidstoysplus.com, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2002.







"DAVIDSON & COMPANY"





|Vancouver, Canada | Chartered Accountants
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|May 15, 2002      |                      
|                  |                      

A member of SC International
1200-609 Granville Street, P.O. Box 10372, Pacific Centre
Vancouver, B.C., Canada v7Y 1G6
Telephone (605) 687-0947  Fax (604) 687-6172
Evelyn PENNINGTON v. William David CRAWFORD

2016-CT-01183-COA

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Filed: March 27, 2018 Closed: May 31, 2018

Motion Desc: Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

Certiorari - Denied.
George K.C. PRINGLE IV, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1382

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey Raymond D., Also Known as Jeffrey D., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. St. Christopher Ottilie, Respondent-Appellant; Jennifer G., Appellant-Respondent, et al., Respondents.

[770 NYS2d 651]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate the mother’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of fact finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated February 15, 2001, as, after a hearing, determined that she permanently neglected the subject child, and (2) from an order of the same court dated August 6, 2001, which, after a hearing, and upon a determination that she violated the terms of the prior order suspending judgment, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, and the petitioner cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the order dated February 15, 2001, as suspended judgment with respect to the mother’s custody and guardianship rights pursuant to Family Court Act §§ 631 and 633, for a period of 12 months.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated February 15, 2001, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 6, 2001, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that the petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that, despite its diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, the mother permanently neglected the subject child by failing to maintain continuous contact with him on a regular basis and failing to plan for his future *(see Matter of Rondale L.,*247 AD2d 617 [1998]; *Matter of Chimere C.,*259 AD2d 615 [1999]).

We have reviewed the record and agree with the mother’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal from the order terminating the mother’s parental rights and transferring custody and guardianship of *the child*to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Shadre D.,*306 AD2d 475 [2003]; *Matter of Alexis B.,*292 AD2d 604 [2002]).

*569Under the facts of this case, the cross appeal from so much of the order of fact finding and disposition dated February 15, 2001, as suspended judgment with respect to the mother’s custody and guardianship rights pursuant to Family Court Act §§ 631 and 633, for a period of 12 months has been rendered academic. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Golden Health Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Hoi-ho Kiu, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, and Maggie Kwok, Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.


/s/ Hoi-ho KiuHoi-ho
                Kiu
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              September
                25, 2006


/s/ Maggie KwokMaggie
                Kwok
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              September
                25, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                       5,333,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,457,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,893,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   960,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,312,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,029,000
<PP&E>                                      11,412,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,899,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,078,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,576,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,385,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,078,000
<SALES>                                     27,098,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,098,000
<CGS>                                       18,186,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,360,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               454,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,874,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   711,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,163,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,163,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.

I, John D. Bair, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of April 30, 2010.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John D. Bair                                 
|Name: John D. Bair Title:
Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0696 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BO BRYAN MICHEL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 11 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 9 2024

09/09/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0696
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chronimed Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory H. Keane,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                         /s/ GREGORY H. KEANE
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Gregory H. Keane
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         November 5, 2004
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carson MAYNARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30016

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 24, 2017

Leif Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Colin Michael Rubich, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

Carson Maynard, Pro Se

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*751MEMORANDUM **

Carson Maynard appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Maynard contends that the district court should have further reduced his sentence. The record reflects that the district court correctly calculated the amended Guidelines range and concluded that, in light of Maynard’s previous substantial assistance to the government and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, a sentence below the amended range was warranted. Maynard is incorrect that the Guidelines required the court to grant a departure comparable to its original departure. *See*U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) & cmt. n.3. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the new sentence or in denying Maynard’s motion for reconsideration. *See United States v. Dunn,*728 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2013); *United States v. Mark,*795 F.3d 1102, 1104 (9th Cir. 2015).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Carroll Lee DEMOSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3538

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and BLACK and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6617
DONALD CORNELIUS JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MS. FARMER, Henrico County Medical Administrator; MR. DENZLER, Henrico County Mailroom Officer; MS. JOHNSON, Henrico County Trusty Officer; MS. BOHANNON, Henrico County Head Nurse; H. DAILY, Lieutenant, Henrico County Jail, In charge of Henrico County Jail Operations; MICHAEL WADE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-29-2) Submitted: September 24, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Cornelius Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Geoffrey Martin Bohn, CUNNINGHAM & ASSOCIATES, Arlington, Virginia; Richard Samuel Samet, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Donald Cornelius Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v. Farmer , No. CA-00-29-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE of Louisiana v. Tommy L. MOUTON

NO. 2017-KO-1149

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

*573Denied.
EX PARTE S.A.J.

CR-16-0457

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
Ronald ARMBRESTER v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

CR-16-0094

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than February 28, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Federal Bank of Wisconsin Employee Stock Ownership Plan, 
Racine, Wisconsin; to retain voting shares of FFBW, Inc., Brookfield, 
Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Federal 
Bank of Wisconsin, Waukesha, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 8, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-03011 Filed 2-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Charles P. STEPHAN and Cathy J. Stephan, Appellants, v. HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee FOR WELLS FARGO ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-8, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1473

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00346

- CR

Jassen BARNES

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR9420 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Appellant’s brief was originally due on October 31, 2013. Appellant is represented on appeal by retained counsel, Ms. Suzanne M. Kramer. On November 4, 2013, this court notified Ms. Kramer, by letter, that the brief was late and instructed her to provide this court, withi n ten days of our letter, with a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief. Ms. Kramer did not respond. Accordingly, on November 18, 2013, this court ordered Ms. Kramer to file appellant’s brief in this court no later December 2, 2013

. Our order cautioned Ms. Kramer that if she did not file appellant’s brief by December 2, 2013, this cause would be abated for the trial court to conduct an abandonment hearing. Ms. Kramer did not respond.

Accordingly, on December 9, 2013, this court aba ted this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether:

(1) appellant desires to prosecute his appeal;

(2) appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief; and

(3) counsel has abandoned the ap peal.The trial court has filed its findings of fact and determined appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and Ms. Kramer has not abandoned the appeal. Ms. Kramer stated on the record she would file appellant’s brief no later than January 13, 2014. The brief has not been filed and telephone calls from the Clerk of this court to Ms. Kramer have not been returned.

Accordingly, Ms. Kramer is hereby ORDERED to appear on February 12, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. before a panel consisting of Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Martinez, and show cause why she should not be held in civil and criminal contempt of this court and/or suspended from practice before this court for violating this court’s orders to timely file appellant’s brief.

Ms. Kramer is advis ed she has the right to be represented by counsel at the show cause hearing and that the proceedings will be recorded by a certified court reporter.

We further ORDER the Clerk of this court to have Ms. Kramer personally served with a copy of this order. We also Order the person who personally serves Ms. Kramer to file with this Court written proof of the date and time that Ms. Kramer was served with a copy of this order. The Clerk of this court shall also fax a copy of this order to the Honorable Maria Te resa Herr, presiding judge of the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court