alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                       8,849,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,032,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,728,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,761,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,640,000
<PP&E>                                      14,153,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,993,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,072,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,869,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       119,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,407,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,072,000
<SALES>                                     31,673,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,673,000
<CGS>                                       22,991,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,408,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               249,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,616,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,020,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,596,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,596,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        


</TABLE>
Jasper E. WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3243; CASE NO.: 2D17-2702

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.8


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors the following:


•annual retainer of $93,500 for the Lead Director  
•annual retainer of $97,000 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
•annual retainer of $87,500 for the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
•annual retainer of $85,000 for the Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee


The equity component of the director's compensation is valued at $170,000.  The annual equity package consists of 50% in stock options and 50% in restricted stock units.   The options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  The restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date.
Michael Paul BUTCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3495

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### LMK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellant v. BLD SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

2016-1636

2016-1637

2016-1638

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 13, 2017

Jeffrey Harty, Nyemaster Goode PC, Des Moines, IA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Christopher Lewis McKee, Craig William Kronenthal, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC.

Scott A. M. Chambers, Porzio, Brom-berg & Newman, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Kevin M. Bell, Richard J. Oparil.

(Moore, Taranto, and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Roswell C. Smith, Respondent, *v.*Joshua P. Lippincott et al., Appellants.

(Submitted May 19, 1871;

decided September term, 1871.)

Decided upon the facts in the case.

*Alexander dk Green*for the appellants.

*John Slosson*for the respondent.

Hunt, C., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Leonard, 0., not sitting. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
David M. FAULK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2750

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 23, 2018

David M. Faulk, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Lewis, Makar, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135045 & (12) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135045 COA: 279697 Wayne CC: 84-004734 MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is proh ibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for
miscellaneous relief is DENIED.

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RAE Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert I. Chen, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 
|-----------------
|February 27,
2003
|
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 34 (Friday, February 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 9406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11659]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Winslow Homer: 
Crosscurrents'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Winslow Homer: Crosscurrents'' at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural 
significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0c3d5d3c4d9dfde82848589f0c3c4d1c4d59ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="285b4d4b5c4147461a1c1d11685b5c495c4d064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-03490 Filed 2-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE EX REL. Montie Banna MONTGOMERY v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 16-KH-2156

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF WEBSTER**

PER CURIAM:

*559Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. *See* *State v. Parker* , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. Relator's sentencing claim is also not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; *see also* *State v. Cotton* , 2009-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030. Relator's claim is also repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(A).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see* 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6099 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the expedited 

removal of aliens who are unlawfully present in the United States and 

are residents of Palestinian-administered territories within Judea and 

Samaria or Gaza. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2023 

Mr. OGLES (for himself and Mr. TIFFANY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the expedited removal of aliens who are unlawfully 

present in the United States and are residents of Palestinian-administered territories within Judea and Samaria 

or Gaza. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Evicting Violent Is5 lamic Criminals That Entered Deviously Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘EVICTED Act’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6099 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REMOVAL FOR UNLAWFULLY PRESENT 

2 ALIENS WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF PALES3 TINIAN-ADMINISTERED TERRITORIES WITHIN 

4 JUDEA AND SAMARIA OR GAZA. 

5 Section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A)(iii)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subclause (I), by inserting ‘‘or subclause 

8 (III)’’ after ‘‘subclause (II)’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(III) ADDITIONAL ALIENS DE11 SCRIBED.—An alien described in this 

12 clause is an alien who is unlawfully 

13 present in the United States and is a 

14 resident of a Palestinian-administered 

15 territory within Judea and Samaria or 

16 Gaza.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEI M, United States District Judge for the 1 District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3566

___________ Marlene Fearing, doing business * as Real Estate by Marlene, Inc., * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Burns & Wilcox, Ltd., as general agent * for Agency Marketing and/or * [UNPUBLISHED] individually, * * Third Party Defendant-Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 19, 1997 Filed: December 29, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Marl ene Fearing appeals from the district court & s order granting summary 1 judg ment to Burns & Wilcox, Ltd. (B&W) in this diversity suit. The district court concluded that, by operation of Minnesota law, Fearing had no claim to pursue against B&W. After de novo review, we affirm.-2-

The relevan t facts are not in dispute. A supper club Fearing owned burne d down. Unable to recover losses from her insolvent, out-of-state fire insurer, Fearing sued her insurance agent, Gary Ban ick, and the insurer & s general agent, B&W, in state court. Ba nick cross-claimed against B&W for contribution. After the state court d i smissed Fearing & s claims against B&W as time-barred, Fearing and Banick settled. Banic k paid Fearing $300,000 and assigned her his contribution claim against B&W. Fea ring released Banick from the lawsuit and indemnified him from any claims made by B&W or others. Fearing then pressed the assigned Banick claim, and B&W removed the case to fed eral court. The district court granted B&W & s motion for summary judgment , concluding that, under Minnesota law, the settlement between Fearing and Banic k incl udeda Pierringer

release that extinguished the settling defendant & s contributio n claim against B&W, a non-settling defendant. See Alumax Mill Prod., I nc. v. Congress Fin. Corp. , 912 F.2d 996, 1010 (8th Cir. 1990); Frey v. Snelgrove , 269 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Minn. 1978). After careful review of the record and the a rguments Fearing makes on appeal, we agree w ith the district court that the settlement and release executed by Fearing and Banick contains the essential elements of a Pierringer release , one effect of which was to extinguish Banick & s assigned contribution claim against B&W

. Se e Thom pson v. Brule , 37 F.3d 1297, 1300 (8th Cir. 1994); Alumax Mill , 912 F.2d a t 1008. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Taquan Shealy, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 755]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (DiFiore, J.), rendered September 16, 2002, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s *511assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### Gregorio Alberto VASQUEZ-BARRIOS, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-73310

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 3, 2017

*377Merlyn Noure Hernandez, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Wendy Benner-Leon, Esquire, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gregorio Alberto Vasquez-Barrios, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo questions of law. *Mohammed v. Gonzales,*400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err or abuse its discretion in denying Vasquez-Barrios’ motion to reopen as untimely, where he filed it more than two years after his final ordipr of removal, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), and he failed to comply with the procedural requirements of *Matter of Lozada,*19 I. *&*N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), *see Singh v. Holder,*658 F.3d 879, 884 (9th Cir. 2011) *(Lozada*compliance required to qualify for equitable tolling of the filing deadline based on ineffective assistance of counsel).

Because the timeliness issue is disposi-tive, the BIA did not err in not reaching the merits of Vasquez-Barrios’ claims for adjustment of status, nor do we reach it here. *See Simeonov v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to reach non-dis-positive issues). We also need not reach Vasquez-Barrios’ contentions regarding prejudice.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EX PARTE Anthony MCCAA

CR-16-0448

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       March 2, 2009 |   | Natural      Gas Services Group, Inc.                                         |
|--------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | By:    | /s/ Earl      R. Wait                                                         |   |
|                           |   | Earl      R. Wait                                                                  |
|                           |   | Vice      President of Accounting(Principal      Accounting Officer) and Treasurer |
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.02


April 4, 1997



Mr. Isaac Shpantzer
Racotek, Inc.
7301 Ohms Lane
Minneapolis, MN

Dear Isaac:

The Company and you agree that the Company will give you 12 months prior 
notice if the Company terminates your employment for any reason other than 
gross misconduct, or, will give you 12 months salary at your prevailing rate 
of pay, not to be less than $16,666.00 a month.

Sincerely,

Mike Fabiaschi

Michael Fabiaschi



Agreed and accepted: Isaac Shpantzer
                     ---------------
                     Isaac Shpantzer















                                       16
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors of 

Ariba, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142810, 333-117437, 333-107864, 333-84916, 333-73458, 333-61064, 333-46820, 333-33544, 333-95665, 333-89119 and333-81773) of Ariba, Inc. of our reports dated November 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ariba, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ariba, Inc., included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

November 13, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of MedSource Technologies, Inc., (The
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I William
J. Kullback, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 26, 2003


                                        /s/ William J. Kullback
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William J. Kullback
                                        Senior Vice President - Finance and
                                         Chief Financial Officer