alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6099 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6099

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
 expedited removal of aliens who are unlawfully present in the United 
States and are residents of Palestinian-administered territories within 
                       Judea and Samaria or Gaza.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2023

Mr. Ogles (for himself and Mr. Tiffany) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
 expedited removal of aliens who are unlawfully present in the United 
States and are residents of Palestinian-administered territories within 
                       Judea and Samaria or Gaza.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Evicting Violent Islamic Criminals 
That Entered Deviously Act'' or the ``EVICTED Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED REMOVAL FOR UNLAWFULLY PRESENT ALIENS WHO ARE 
              RESIDENTS OF PALESTINIAN-ADMINISTERED TERRITORIES WITHIN 
              JUDEA AND SAMARIA OR GAZA.

    Section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (I), by inserting ``or subclause (III)'' 
        after ``subclause (II)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(III) Additional aliens 
                                described.--An alien described in this 
                                clause is an alien who is unlawfully 
                                present in the United States and is a 
                                resident of a Palestinian-administered 
                                territory within Judea and Samaria or 
                                Gaza.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RAE Systems Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert I. Chen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), that:



|                     |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ROBERT I. CHENRobert I. Chen President and Chief Executive
Officer
|Date: March 23, 2004 |  |                                                                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnold James BEGAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10315

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 14, 2017

Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Arnold James Begay, Pro Se

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Arnold James Begay appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 47-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Begay’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to -withdraw as counsel of record. Begay has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial information extracted from SEC
     Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000883946           
<NAME>                        TREEV INC
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,103)
<INVENTORY>                                        691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,336
<PP&E>                                           7,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,504)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,472
<SALES>                                         14,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,129
<CGS>                                            7,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,933)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)
        


</TABLE>
Eleanor PRICE v. U-HAUL CO. OF ALABAMA, INC.

2160265

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T DECEMBER 13, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 11 93 7 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 1 :0 9- cv -2 36 28 -PCH

CARLOS AMADOR RI VAS, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff - App el la nt , ver su s CARNIVAL CORPOR ATION, d.b .a. Carn iv al Cru is e Lin es , Inc ., ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt - App el le e.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t forth e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Dece m be r 13 , 20 11 ) Befo re CARNES, BAR KETT and ANDERSON, Circu it Ju dg es . PER CURI AM:Carl os Ri va s ap pe al s th e di s t ric t co ur t’s or de r di sm is si ng hi s cas e an d

co m pe ll in g arb it rat io n. Afte r we is su ed o u r o p i n io ns in Lin do v. NCL (Bah am as ), Ltd ., 65 2 F.3 d 12 57 (1 1t h Ci r. 20 11 ), an d Hen riq ue z v. NCL Bah am as (Ltd .), No. 09

- 16 34 4 (1 1t h Ci r. Sep t. 6, 20 11 ), we as ke d Ri va s an d Carn iv al Co rp or at io n to su bm it
su pp le m en ta l le tt er br ie fs di sc us si ng th e effe ct of th os e de ci si on s on th is ap pe al
. In hi s su pp le m en ta l le tt er br ie f, Ri va s co nc ed es th at ou r de ci si on in Lin do fo recl os es hi s arg um en ts in th is ap pe al . W e ag ree. AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Mezabay International Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Shoon Hau Tsin,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated
this 15th day of April, 2010








SHOON HAU
TSIN


Shoon
Hau Tsin


Chief
Executive Officer
EX PARTE D.L.G.

(In re: The matter of J.D., a minor child)

2160669

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 1, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
#### Rona Rosemond ANSAH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALMART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1300

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

Rona Rosemond Ansah, Appellant Pro Se. John Mark Murdock, BENTON POTTER MURDOCK, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rona Rosemond Ansah appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ansah leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ansah v. WalMart Stores, Inc.,*No. 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD, 2017 WL 497372 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
ALFA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. Keith STEWART, personal representative of the Estate of Danny Vaughn Stewart, deceased

2160351

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 28, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ARIBA INC'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001084755
<NAME> ARIBA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,084
<SECURITIES>                                   102,156
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (20)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,045
<PP&E>                                          11,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,021
<SALES>                                         26,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,372
<CGS>                                              724
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        98
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.84)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS INFORMATION HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT A TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT,
EFFECTED IN THE FORM OF A STOCK DIVIDEND TO EACH STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AS OF
DECEMBER 3, 1999. PRIOR FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES HAVE NOT BEEN RESTATED FOR THE
RECAPITALIZATION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
454 A.2d 162

#### Commonwealth v. Cooper, Appellant.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Granted April 5, 1983.

Submitted May 4, 1982.

Elaine DeMasse, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Jane Cutler Greenspan, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, ROWLEY and CIRILLO, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

ROWLEY, J., filed a memorandum concurring opinion.

SPAETH, J., filed a memorandum dissenting opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         2342450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2460560
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1265868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7681439
<PP&E>                                        16348057
<DEPRECIATION>                               (4370435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21265629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2983341
<BONDS>                                        2423843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         30698
<OTHER-SE>                                    14840961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21265629
<SALES>                                        8795056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          7295917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1979377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (27744)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (507982)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (164880)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (343102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (343102)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Buddy T. WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-614

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Danny POWELL v. Kenya MADISON

2160533

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000883842
<NAME> M-WAVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,295,657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,927,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,660,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,832,352
<PP&E>                                      17,290,648
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,689,003)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,256,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,555,906
<BONDS>                                      2,274,123
<COMMON>                                        30,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,792,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,256,367
<SALES>                                     18,861,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                       18,818,169
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,918,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (284,745)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,139,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,473,516)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,666,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,666,448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
See T EX . R. A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“ W h e n d e n y in g r e lie f, t h e c o u rt m a y h a n d d o w n a n o p in io n b u t is 1 n o t r e q u i re d to d o s o .”) ; T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 (d i s ti n g u i s h i n g o p i n i o n s a n d m e m o ra n d u m o p i n i o n s ). 

### NU MBE R 13- 09- 0053 9-CV 

## CO UR T O F APP EAL S THI RTEENT H DI ST RI CT OF TE XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ IN RE THE TORO COMPANY

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On P et i ti on fo r W ri t o f M an da m us .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ MEM ORA ND UM OPIN ION Be fo reC hi ef

Ju sti ceV al de z a nd Ju sti ce s Yañ eza nd B en av i de s Mem ora ndum Opi nio n P er Cu ria m 1 Re la t o r, T h e T o ro Co m p a n y, fil e d a p e t it io n fo r w r i to f m a n d a m u sin t h e a b o ve caus e on Sep te m b e r 24, 2 009. The par ti es herein have now

fil ed an “Ag re ed M oti on to Dismiss Petitio n for W rit of Manda mu s.” The Co urt, hav ing co nsi dered th e docum e n ts o n fil e and the a g re ed moti on to dis mis s t hisor ig ina l proceed ing , i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he motion s h o u ld be g ra nted. Accordin g ly , the sta y prev iou sl y impos ed by thi s Cou rt is LIF TED and th is o rig ina l p ro ce e d ing i s D ISM ISSE D w it hout re ferenc e to the mer its t hereof. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 52. 10(b ) (“Unless vacat ed o r mod if ied, a n orde r g rantin g tem pora ry relief is effective until2

the case is finally decid ed. ”). Pen ding mot ions, if any, are likew ise DISMISSE D. ITIS SO ORDERED. PERC UR IAM
Delivered and filed this 8th d ay of Apr il , 201 0.
EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------



The  Board  of  Directors
Genesis  Bioventures  Inc.

We  consent  to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form  S-8  of  Genesis  Bioventures  Inc. of our report dated April 6, 2004 with
respect  to  the  consolidated  balance sheets of Genesis Bioventures Inc. as of
December  31,  2003  and  2002,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations  and stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended and
the  period  from  inception  on  September 19, 1994 to December 31, 2003, which
report  appears  in  the  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A2 of Genesis Bioventures
Inc.

Our  report  dated  April  6, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash
flows  from  operations,  which  raise  substantial  doubt  about its ability to
continue  as  a  going  concern.  The  consolidated  financial statements do not
include  any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG  LLP
Chartered  Accountants

Vancouver,  Canada
August 30,  2004


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1


                    STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 (the "Form 10-Q") of Grayson Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company"), we,
Jacky K. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Blake M. Edwards,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to our knowledge:

     (a)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  the  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



         By:      /s/ Jacky K. Anderson                Date: August 14, 2007
                  Jacky K. Anderson
                  Chief Executive Officer



         By:      /s/ Blake M. Edwards                 Date: August 14, 2007
                  Blake M. Edwards
                  Chief Financial Officer