Reversed in Part, Remanded, and Memorandum Opinion filed December 5, 

2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00833-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.H., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-29859

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This accelerated appeal arises from a final decree in a suit in which 

termination of the parent-child relationship was at issue. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 

§ 109.002(a-1). The trial court terminated the parental rights of S.H. (Mother) and 

R.A.G. (Father), respectively, with respect to their son, E.H.

1 The trial court also 

appointed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the 

“Department”) to be E.H.’s managing conservator. Only Mother appeals.2

1 We use initials to refer to the children and parents involved in this case. See Tex. Fam. Code 

Ann. § 109.002(d); Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2).

2 Mother’s parental rights as to other children were terminated in two separate proceedings. Her 

appeals from those terminations were assigned to this court. No. 14-19-00832-CV, In the Interest 
2

Court reporter Tony Baiamonte III notified this court that he is unable to 

produce his portion of the reporter’s record (volumes 2, 5, and 6) because the 

electronic recording is inaudible. An appellant is entitled to a new trial when she 

timely requests the reporter’s record, and, by no fault of the appellant, the reporter’s

record has been lost or destroyed, is necessary for the appeal, and cannot be 

reconstructed. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f); Gavrel v. Rodriguez, 225 S.W.3d 758, 

761 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2007, pet. denied); In re B.H., No. 14-16-

01011-CV, 2017 WL 1015697, *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 14, 2017, 

no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (reversing portion of judgment terminating 

appellant’s parental rights and granting appellant new trial because reporter’s record 

was lost or destroyed).

On November 13, 2019, we abated this appeal for the trial court to make 

findings under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f). Supplemental clerk’s and 

reporter’s records regarding those findings have been filed. The trial court found:

(1) Mother timely requested a reporter’s record;

(2) without Mother’s fault, a significant portion of the court

reporter’s notes and recordings have been lost or destroyed or is 

inaudible;

(3) the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter’s notes

and recordings are necessary to the appeal’s resolution; and

(4) the parties cannot agree on the replacement of the portions of the 

reporter’s notes or recordings nor can the parties agree that the 

notes or recordings can be duplicated with reasonable certainty.

The trial court concluded that Mother is entitled to a new trial under Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 34.6(f). 

of A.S.G., and N.P.G., Children; and No. 14-19-00834-CV, In the Interest of N.A.H., a Child.
3

In light of the trial court’s findings, we REVERSE only that portion of the 

final decree terminating Mother’s parental rights to E.H. and REMAND this case to 

the trial court for a new trial to be held as to only those claims brought by the 

Department against Mother. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.401(b-1). We leave the 

remainder of the decree undisturbed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.