alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IN RE Jerry A. BRENDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant.

No. 16-35436

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 20, 2017

Jerry A. Brenden, Pro Se

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jerry A. Brenden appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying him leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. *Moy v. United States,*906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to treat Brenden’s proposed complaint as commencing a civil action because Brenden failed to comply with the requirements set forth in the vexatious litigant ordered entered against him. *See West v. Procunier, 452 F.2d*645, 646 (9th Cir. 1971) (concluding that an order refusing to authorize filing of complaint was a “proper exercise of the district court’s authority to effectuate compliance with its earlier order”).

To the extent that Brenden seeks to challenge the underlying vexatious litigant order, we do not consider his contentions because such a challenge is outside the scope of this appeal.

We do not consider any motions and requests relating to other district court cases and appeals.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6118

 To prohibit funding for the United Nations Human Rights Council until 
                           it condemns Hamas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2023

   Mrs. Luna (for herself, Mr. Ogles, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mrs. 
   Spartz, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Santos, Mr. 
Brecheen, Mr. Moskowitz, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. Curtis, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. 
Burlison, Mr. Steube, and Mr. Gooden of Texas) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit funding for the United Nations Human Rights Council until 
                           it condemns Hamas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stand with Israel Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDS FOR THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS 
              COUNCIL.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Hamas, Iranian backed terrorists, 
on October 7, 2023, launched a massive, unprovoked war on Israel by 
firing thousands of rockets, gunmen storming Israeli homes killing 
whoever they could find, resulting in the death and abduction of 
countless Israeli and American civilians.
    (b) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be obligated or expended to 
provide assessed or voluntary contributions or any other funding to the 
United Nations Human Rights Council until the United Nations Security 
Council and United Nations General Assembly adopts a resolution to 
condemn Hamas relating to its actions described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
I updated ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Ameresco, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63513

)

Under Contract No. N40085

- 20

- D

- 0032 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Ron R. Hutchinson, Esq.

Doyle & Bachman LLP

McLean, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Billy B. Ruhling, II, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: August 8 , 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63513

, Appeal of

Ameresco, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: August 8, 2023 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Neville LAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-2750

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Dennis Lynn EARLEY

CR-16-0342

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 12 59

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el le e
v. Brad le y Ch arl es W id en er ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e North ern Dis tri ctof I owa - Dub uq ue

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 29, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Ju ne 1, 2 01 8 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Brad le y Ch arl es W id en er ap pe al s th e se nt en ce th e di st ric t co urt im po se d aft er 1 rev ok in g hi s su pe rv is ed rel eas e. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on u n d e r 2 8 U .S.C. § 12 91 , th is co ur t af fir m s.
The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea de , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Nor th ern 1 Dis tri ctof I owa .Co un se l ha s fil ed a br ie f arg ui ng th at th e rev oc at io n se nt en ce is su bs ta nt iv el y

un reas on ab le , an d ha s m ov ed to wit hd raw. W id en er ha s fil ed a br ie f ch al le ng in g bo th hi s se nt en ce an d a sp eci al co nd it io n of su pe rv is ed rel eas e requi rin g hi m to te m po rari ly resi de at a res id en ti al reen try cent er (R RC) upo n h is rel eas e. Thi s co ur t co nc lu de s th at th e rev oc at io n se nt en ce is no t subs ta nt iv el y un reas on ab le , se e Uni te d St at es v. Mer ri va l , 52 1 F.3 d 88 9, 89 0 (8 th Ci r. 2 0 08 ) (ab us e-o f-d is cret io n rev ie w); se e al so Uni te d St at es v. Petr ei kis , 55 1 F .3d 82 2, 82 4 (8 th C i r . 2 00 9) (ap pl y in g pr es um pt io n of su bs ta nt iv e reas on ab le ne ss to rev oc at io n se nt en ce wit hi n Gui de li ne s ran ge ), an d th at W id en er’s ch al le ng e to th e RRC co nd it io n is wit ho ut m eri t, se e Uni te d St at es v. Mel to n , 66 6 F.3 d 51 3 , 5 1 7

- 1 8 (8 th C i r . 20 12 ) (req ui rin g de fen da nt to te m po rari ly res id e at RRC as co nd it io n o f su pe rv is edrel eas e h as be en reg ul arl y up he ldas r eas on ab le co nd it io n)

. The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed . Cou ns el ’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### MEARS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. FINISAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Cross-Appellant

2016-1485

2016-1503

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 11, 2017

George C. Summerfield, Jr., Stadheim *&*Grear, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Kyle L. Harvey, Robert M. Spalding, Christopher H. St. Peter, Rolf Stadheim.

David C. Radulesgu, Radulescu LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by Robin M. Davis, Maria Granovsky, Etai Lahav, Tigran Vardanian.

(Dyk, Taranto, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
PLYMOUTH MORTGAGE COMPANY
95 Bedford Street, PO. Box 620, Middleborough, MA 02346-0620 (800) 254-1477

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding  fiscal  year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations   under  these  Agreements
    throughout  such  year,  or if them has been a  default  or  failure  of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a
    description of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
    been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(c) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
    Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
    Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
    any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property,the reason for the
    non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
Gary A. Brown
Officer

Gary A. Brown
Title

March 30, 2000
Date
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Pedro ARCE-ORDONES, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40934 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Pedro Arce-Ordones, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

*165PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Arce-Ordones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Arce-Ordones has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Aree-Ordones’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cib. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6239 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

250 Edward Street in Branchville, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Betty W. 

Henderson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. CLYBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 250 Edward Street in Branchville, South 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Betty W. Henderson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BETTY W. HENDERSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 250 Edward Street in 

6 Branchville, South Carolina, shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Betty W. Henderson Post Office Build8 ing’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6239 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Betty W. Henderson 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Officer Certification** Exhibit 31.1
I, L. Dick Buell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Catalina MarketingCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004     By: /s/ L. Dick Buell   Chief Executive Officer and Director
37
Exhibit 24.4





STATE OF TEXAS             §


COUNTY OF DALLAS      §





POWER OF ATTORNEY





Know all men by these presents, that I, WILLIAM M. SAMS, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.





In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14th day of June, 2011.








/s/ William M. Sams


WILLIAM M. SAMS











ACKNOWLEDGMENT





Before me this 14th day of June, 2011, came WILLIAM M. SAMS, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.








/s/ Mary Sellner Thomas


NOTARY PUBLIC
Corey SCHOFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0528

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 2018

John Edward Eagen, Tallahassee; Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant's notice of appeal failed to timely invoke the Court's jurisdiction to review the Judgment and Sentence. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Any request for belated appeal must be filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

Roberts, Wetherell, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.38


November 7, 2018


Cyril Allouche


Dear Cyril:


This memo will confirm your current title and compensation as an Executive Officer at Revance Therapeutics:


	
			
	Title:
	Head of Finance, Corporate Controller & Principal Accounting Officer
	 

	Base Salary:
	$265,000
	 

	Bonus Target %:
	30%
	 






Sincerely,


Justin Ford


	
			
	/s/ Justin Ford
	 
	 

	Justin Ford
	 
	 

	Vice President, Human Resources and Head of People
Miguel Adolfo MARTE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1174

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
H.E.O. v. STATE

CR-16-0095

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Steve AUSTIN, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-0727

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018

Steve Austin, Jr., in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
07/08/2010 17;14 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS glOOI/001 

< 

comlux 

THE AVIATION CROUP 

•^1 'I I 

"/^=*fc,j^. Comlux Aviation Services 

li^/ 3 2640 S Cargo Drive 

^^ Indianapolis, IN 46241 

^'~ ~ D A'; J 317.472.7370 

•*^£4B;NQ.D0CKer 

Jun. 28, 2010 

Attention: Hon. Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M20 

U-S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S-E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Judge Benkin, 

Subject: Request for Extension of Hearing - DMS No. FAA-2010'0317 

I have contacted Attorney Zuraies regarding this case and expressed my desire for an extension of the 

July 22"" 2010 Hearing date to allow for Settlement discussions to conclude. Mr. Zurales indicated there 

were no objections on his part for the requested extension, and I propose that an extension of 60 days 

or more will be sufficient. 

Thank you for your attention in this matter and please feel free to contact me at your convenience if I 

may provide any additional information. 

Sincerely, 

Mark A. Nelson 

Vice President 

Comlux Aviation Services 

Mark.nel5on(S>comluxaviaticn.us 

Cc: Chris Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

THE COMPLETE LUXURY AVIATION SERVICE
ASAP RESTORATION AND CONSTRUCTION, INC., a/a/o Suzanne Casey, Appellant, v. TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2581

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 31, 2018]

Gray Proctor of Fox & Loquasto, P.A., Orlando, and Vanessa Valdes of Militzok & Levy, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Scot E. Samis and Jonathan S. Tannen of Traub Lieberman Straus & Srewsberry LLP, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* .

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1997         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0                 985
<SECURITIES>                                        0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              38,492,000          36,119,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                 2,108,000           2,219,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           38,492,000          36,119,000
<PP&E>                                      6,191,000           4,597,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             65,920,000          57,720,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      16,686,000          10,942,000
<BONDS>                                             0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                   0
<COMMON>                                      108,000             106,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 22,792,000          24,426,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               65,920,000          57,720,000
<SALES>                                             0                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           26,618,000          19,924,000
<CGS>                                      21,291,000          14,867,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,353,000           3,458,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (389,000)             12,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              488,000             432,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            608,000             287,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,585,000           1,587,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  720,000             665,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                   0
<CHANGES>                                           0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                  865,000             922,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.08                0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.08                0.09
        


</TABLE>