alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                    STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIION 1350

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q") of Grayson  Bankshares,  Inc. (the  "Company"),
we, Jacky K.  Anderson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Blake M.
Edwards,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

          (a) the Form 10-Q  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (b) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



         By:      /s/ Jacky K. Anderson              Date:  May 15, 2008
                  Jacky K. Anderson
                  Chief Executive Officer



         By:      /s/Blake M. Edwards                Date:  May 15, 2008
                  Blake M. Edwards
                  Chief Financial Officer
Opinion issued August 4, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 16 - 00229 - CV NO. 01 - 16 - 00230 - CV

——————————— IN RE B.M. , Relator

O riginal Proceeding o n Petition for Writ of Mandamus

OPINION Relator, B.M. , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to vacate a “Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing” in the underlying trial court proceedings
. 1

1 The proceeding underlying Cause No. 01

- 16

- 00229

- CV is Case No. 2008

- 03683, In the Interest of J.L.F. and G.W.F., Children , in the 311th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Alicia Franklin York presiding. The proceeding underlying Cause No. 01

- 16

- 00230

- CV is Case No. 2015

- 42486, In the Interest of G.J.H. , aWe deny the petition and dismiss as moot relator’s motion for stay pending

review of the petition for a writ of mandamus
. P ER C URIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd. Justice Jennings, dissenting.

Child , in the 311th District Court of Harris County, the H onorable Alicia Franklin York presiding
.
David GOTHARD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kevin RAMBOSK, Collier County Sheriff, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 19, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

KHOUZAM, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### Byron DAVIS, Petitioner-Appellant v. Darrel VANNOY, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee

No. 16-30530

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 19, 2017

Byron Davis, Pro Se

Mithun Kamath, District Attorney’s Office for the Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent-Appellee

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Byron Davis, Louisiana prisoner # 570235, moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal in this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding. He was convicted of the aggravated rape of a minor victim, and he was sentenced to life in prison at hard labor without the benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” *Mosley v. Cozby,*813 F.2d 659, 660 *329(5th Cir. 1987). This court has jurisdiction over final decisions and other decisions covered by the collateral order doctrine. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; *Mohawk Indus., Inc. v. Carpenter,*558 U.S. 100, 103, 106, 116, 130 S.Ct. 599, 175 L.Ed.2d 458 (2009). In this case, the order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the final judgment dismissing Davis’s § 2254 petition, and the district court’s order denying Davis a COA were all vacated. Neither the final judgment nor the other two orders were ever reinstated, and Davis’s petition was not dismissed anew.

Absent the entry of a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. *See*§ 1291. Moreover, due to the lack of an order denying a COA, we assume without deciding that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, which has language similar to former Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. *See Cardenas v. Thaler,*651 F.3d 442, 444-45 & n.1 (5th Cir. 2011).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and Davis’s motion for a COA is DENIED as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Bobby Gene MILES v. STATE

CR-16-0593

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017 Reh. denied June 9, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Wali SALEEM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-945

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE DURA OPERATING, LLC, et al.

1150498

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 17, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
M E M O R A N D U M 

DATE: September 20, 2012

FROM: Jeanhee Hong, Assistant Regional Counsel, EPA Region 9

TO: File / Public Docket, EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0734

RE: 9/18/12 EPA Conference Call with CVAQ re: San Joaquin Valley (SJV) air 

quality issues

On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, the following people participated in a conference call to 

discuss air quality issues in the SJV:

EPA: Jared Blumenfeld, Zoe Heller, Kerry Drake, Mike Bandrowski, Jeanhee Hong, Frances 

Wicher, Niloufar Glousson, Deborah Jordan, Debbie Lowe Liang, Sona Chilingaryan, Andrew 

Steckel. CVAQ: Sarah Sharpe (Fresno Metro Ministry), Kevin Hamilton (Clinica Sierra Vista), 

Maricela Mares-Alatorre (Greenaction/El Pueblo Para El Aire y Agua Limpio), Laura Baker, 

Brent Newell (CRPE), Tom Frantz (AIR), Emily Schrepf (NPCA), Rey Leon (Valley LEAP), 

Kevin Hall (CVAQ), Elizabeth Jonasson (Coalition for Clean Air), Paul Cort, Nike Adeyeye 

(Earthjustice), Katie Garvey.

CVAQ expressed concern about EPA’s proposed rule on the 1-hour ozone plan for the SJV (77 

FR 58078, signed August 30, 2012, published September 19, 2012) and how the proposal

differed from recent proposals related to ozone plans for the South Coast. CVAQ expressed 

disappointment in EPA’s proposal to withdraw the Agency’s previous approval of the SJV 1-

hour ozone plan without a simultaneous disapproval, which would start Clean Air Act sanctions 

clocks and require EPA approval of a new plan to turn off the clocks. CVAQ also expressed 

disappointment in the lack of direction in EPA’s proposal regarding the requirements for a new 

1-hour ozone plan, e.g., on whether the State could rely on a “black box.” 

EPA indicated that the circumstances in the South Coast are significantly different from the 

circumstances in the SJV. With respect to the SJV, EPA indicated the State had expressed its 

intent to withdraw the 1-hour plan and that EPA would then promptly make a finding of failure 

to submit, which would trigger sanctions and FIP clocks. EPA also indicated that the State may

submit a letter seeking to withdraw the SJV 1-hour ozone plan before EPA’s current proposal is 

finalized, in which case EPA could make a finding of failure to submit simultaneously with a

final rule withdrawing EPA’s previous approval.

The agenda associated with this conference call is attached to this memorandum.
Melissa A. BAYLESS and David Riddle v. ALABAMA HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY

2160385

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 9, 2017 Dismissed as to appellant David Riddle. May 12, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed as to appellant David Riddle.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Lidio V. SorianoLidio V. Soriano, CPA
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officers each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of American Wenshen Steel Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








January 12, 2010                                                                                   /s/Yang
Kuidong


Yang Kuidong


Chief Executive Officer





January 12, 2010                                                                                   /s/Zhang
Liwei


Zhang Liwei


Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jimmy Lee ELLIS, Jr. v. STATE

CR-16-0508

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Christian OGDEN-BLACKSHEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-119

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Iswat APATA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1956

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
John KITCHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3213

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Ana D. ARCE, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1821

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 7, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Gerald J. CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0109

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                          APACHE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
           EXHIBIT 11.1 - COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended June 30,         Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                                  1998             1997              1998            1997
                                                              ------------    ------------       ------------   ------------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>                  <C>            <C>     
Income applicable to common shares:

Net loss                                                            $(989)        $(4,466)             $(994)       $(7,638)

                                                              ------------    ------------       ------------   ------------
              Loss applicable to common shares                      $(989)        $(4,466)             $(994)       $(7,638)
                                                              ============    ============       ============   ============



     Weighted average number of common shares outstanding           7,289           7,245              7,289          7,242


              Weighted average common shares                        7,289           7,245              7,289          7,242
                                                              ============    ============       ============   ============


     Loss per common share                                         $(0.14)         $(0.62)            $(0.14)        $(1.05)
                                                              ============    ============       ============   ============

</TABLE>
Jose Luis RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Opinion issued June 18, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00406-CR

———————————

IN RE WILLIAM SOLOMON LEWIS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, William Solomon Lewis, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, 

contending that the trial court has failed to consider or rule on his application for a 

writ of habeas corpus seeking a reduction in the amount of his bail.

1

We deny the petition.

 

1 The underlying case is William Solomon Lewis v. The State of Texas, cause number

2256940, in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 14 of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable David L. Singer presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Landau, and Countiss.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
MARK YACHT CLUB ON BRICKELL BAY, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ASPEN NPL II, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1751

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 20, 2017

ORDERED that appellant's notice of voluntary dismissal is recognized by the Court, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6116 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6116

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14280 South Military Trail in Delray Beach, Florida, as the 
           ``Benjamin Berell Ferencz Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENJAMIN BERELL FERENCZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 14280 South Military Trail in Delray Beach, Florida, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Benjamin Berell Ferencz Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Benjamin 
Berell Ferencz Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 4, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6116

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 14280 South Military Trail in Delray Beach, Florida, as the 
           ``Benjamin Berell Ferencz Post Office Building''.
```
Charles VANDERSNICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3966

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tyrone SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2988

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 16, 2018

Tyrone Smith, Crawfordville, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Rebecca Rock McGuigan and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
A.A.L. v. T.L.

2160256

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Dwayne D. HAGANS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration Disaster Declaration #17336 and #17337; CONNECTICUT Disaster Number CT-00056
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of CONNECTICUT (FEMA-4629-DR), dated 02/03/2022. *Incident:*
                         Remnants of Hurricane Ida. *Incident Period:*
                         09/01/2021 through 09/02/2021.
 DATES: Issued on 02/03/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/04/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/03/2022.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 02/03/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Fairfield, Litchfield. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17336 8 and for economic injury is 17337 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Barbara Carson, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance


[FR Doc. 2022-02831 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
EX PARTE Corey TOLBERT

CR-16-0591

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.