alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carmike Cinemas,
Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies
that, to his/her knowledge on the date hereof:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    RICHARD B.
HARE                                                                                               
|Richard B. Hare                                                                                                      
|Senior Vice PresidentFinance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                                                                     
|March 1, 2010
#### Prince E. EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael GOWER, Asst. Director, operations, Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC); et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-35611

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 17, 2017

Prince E. Edwards, Pro Se

*256Joña J. Maukonen, Esquire, Attorney, Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Former Oregon state prisoner Prince E. Edwards appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations arising from his conditions of confinement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Grenning v. Miller-Stout,*739 F.3d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Edwards failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the frequency with which the prison call center’s portable toilets were cleaned denied him the “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” *Hallett v. Morgan,*296 F.3d 732, 744 (9th Cir. 2002) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); *Anderson v. County of Kern,*45 F.3d 1310, 1314-15 (9th Cir. 1995) .(lack of sanitation must be severe and prolonged to constitute an Eighth Amendment violation).

We reject as without merit Edwards’ contention that the district court improperly relied on disputed material facts in its ruling.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
First Amendment to Senior Secured Multicurrency Credit Facility Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 [Société Générale letterhead] 
  

	To:	Carrizo UK Huntington Ltd (the “Borrower”) 

  

	From:	Société Générale as Facility Agent for and on behalf of the Finance Parties 


 

	Date:	17 April 2012 

 Dear Sirs, 

 

	1.	INTRODUCTION 

  

	1.1	We refer to the $84,000,000 senior secured multicurrency credit facility agreement dated 28 January 2011 (the “Facility Agreement”) between, among
others, the Borrower and Société Générale. 

  

	1.2	Unless otherwise stated, terms defined in the Facility Agreement (whether expressly or by incorporation) have the same meaning when used in this letter.


  

	2.	AMENDMENTS 

  

	 	With	effect from the date of your countersignature to this letter: 

  

	2.1	the definition of “Final Completion Date” in Clause 1.1 (Definitions) of the Facility Agreement shall be amended by deleting “31 December
2012” and replacing this with “30 June 2013”; and 

  

	2.2	Schedule 12 (Repayment Schedule) of the Facility Agreement shall be amended by deleting the repayment schedule in full and replacing it with the repayment
schedule set out in the Annex to this letter. 

  

	3.	CONSENT LEVEL 

 In order
to effect the amendments to the Facility Agreement in paragraph 2 above, the consent of all the Lenders is required. 
  

	4.	FACILITY AGENT CONFIRMATION 

 The Facility Agent confirms that all Lenders have consented to the amendments referred to in paragraph 2 of this letter. 
  

	5.	REPRESENTATIONS 

 The
Borrower confirms, by reference to the facts and circumstances then existing, to each Finance Party that on the date of this letter the Repeating Representations are true. 

 

	6.	GENERAL 

  

	6.1	Save as expressly provided for in this letter, no provision of any Finance Document is waived, amended or otherwise modified and the amendments contemplated in this
letter shall be without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the Finance Parties with respect to any other matters. 

  

	6.2	This letter is designated a Finance Document. 

  

	6.3	This letter may be executed in a number of counterparts, and this has the same effect as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this letter.










	6.4	This letter and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with this letter are governed by English law. 


 

	6.5	The courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with this letter (including any non-contractual dispute
or claim). 

  

	6.6	Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this letter by counter-signing this letter or a copy of it. 


 

			
	Yours faithfully
	
	/s/ Brian Courtney
	 For and on behalf of
 Société Générale as Facility Agent for and on behalf of the Finance Parties


 We agree to the terms of this letter: 
  

					
		 	/s/ Gerald A. Morton	 	                Date: 17 April 2012

 For and on behalf of 
 Carrizo UK Huntington Ltd 
 for and on behalf of itself and Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.


  
 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
  Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationAvasta, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaClearBlue Technologies Management, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Chicago-Wells, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Las Vegas, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Los Angeles, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Milwaukee, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Oak Brook, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Vienna, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/Dallas, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/New York, Inc.
    
    DelawareClearblue Technologies/San Francisco, Inc.
    
    DelawareConxion Corporation
    
    CaliforniaIntrepid Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareLexington Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawarenetASPx, LLC
    
    DelawareNaviSite India Private Limited
    
    IndiaNaviSite Europe Limited
    
    UK
**STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA**  **- HQ**  **- OW** **- 2009**  **- 0819** 
**DCN: SE0**  **990 THE FOLLOWING**  **HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION**  **(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.**
EX PARTE Melvin RAY

1160318 (CR-15-1118)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

3-17-2017

Cert. denied.
Victor Colton ALLEN v. STATE

CR-16-0080

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

Affirmed.
#### David MARRERO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WARDEN, LSCI BUTNER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6681

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 25, 2017

David Marrero, Appellant Pro Se.

*267Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Marrero, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Marrero v. Warden, LSCI Butner,*No. 5:17-hc-02020-BO (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Reuben I. PIERCE, Jr. v. Antoinette W. PIERCE

2150870

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 5, 2017 Reh. denied June 23, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

OF
PINNACLE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2009

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the Issuer). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009.

I,
Michael R. Sayre, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

This certification is executed as of May 8, 2009.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/    Michael R. Sayre         
|Name: Michael R. Sayre          
|Title:   Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable Benjamin H. Grumbles Secretary, Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21230 Dear Secretary Grumbles: 

### JUL 2

### 92015

On July 15,2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP), SIP revision #15-03, from the Maryland Department ofthe Environment (MDE). The SIP revision consists ofa negative declaration for the Automobile and Light-Duty TruckAssembly Coatings Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG). EPA has determined thatthe submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk, at (215) 814-2166. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: George S. Aburn, Director, MDE Brian Hug, MDE Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

CustomerServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of **Asian Alliance Ventures, Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Benjamin Leboe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
/s/ Benjamin LeboeBenjamin LeboeChief Financial OfficerDecember 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 13, 2009
    /s/ Robert I. ChenRobert I. ChenPresident, Chief Executive Officer
andChairman of the Board A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley D. ARMSTRONG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7096

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

*832Stanley D. Armstrong, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stanley D. Armstrong, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the .denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Armstrong has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Darrell L. PETE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 5D17-2208 5D17-2533

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Eddie Lee JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-647

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. DiNella, the Chief Financial Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: May 2, 2008      
|                       
|/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA  
|Ronald M. DiNella      
|Chief Financial Officer
kura-ex1024_86.htm



Exhibit 10.24

1st Amendment to Sublease

 

 

This 1st Amendment to Sublease (this “1st Amendment”) is entered into effective as of March 1, 2019 (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between Wellspring Biosciences, Inc.., a Delaware corporation (“Sublandlord”), and Kura Oncology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Subtenant”)

Whereas, Sublandlord and Subtenant are parties to that certain Sublease dated December 20, 2016 with respect to premises at 3033 Science Park Road San Diego, CA 92121, (the “Sublease”), and desire to amend the Sublease as set forth herein.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1.Section 2 of the Sublease is hereby amended to extend the expiration date of the Term of the Sublease to April 30, 2020.

2.Except as amended as described above, all other terms and conditions of the Sublease will remain in full force and effect.

 

In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this 1st Amendment effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 


	
Wellspring Biosciences, Inc.
	
 
	
Kura oncology, Inc.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Carin Sandvik
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ John Farnam

	
Name:
	
     Carin Sandvik
	
 
	
Name:
	
     John Farnam

	
Title:
	
     Vice President, Finance
	
 
	
Title:
	
     COO
[Cite as State v. Shough , 2017-Ohio-9268.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-06-081

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 12/28/2017 : RYAN SHOUGH, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2012-06-1018

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee Christopher P. Frederick, 300 High Street, Hamilton, OH 45011, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Ryan Shough, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errorsButler CA2017-06-081 by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) req uests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
NaviSite, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos.
333-89987, 333-67786, 333-67774, 333-56454, 333-56452 and 333-56478 on Form S-8
of NaviSite, Inc. of our report dated September 25, 2001, except as to Note 15,
which is as of October 29, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
NaviSite, Inc. and subsidiary as of July 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended July 31,
2001, and our report dated September 25, 2001 relating to the consolidated
financial statement schedule, which reports are included in the July 31, 2001
Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaviSite, Inc.

                                           /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 29, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-122044 of Salon Media Group, Inc. of our report
dated May 4, 2006, except for the restatement discussed in Note 1 and in the
thirteenth paragraph of Note 12 to the financial statements, as to which the
date is October 25, 2006, relating to the financial statements of Salon Media
Group, Inc. which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.


/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
San Francisco, California
October 27, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03326]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR GLOBAL MEDIA


USAGM Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: United States Agency for Global Media.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) announces 
the members of its SES Performance Review Board (PRB).

ADDRESSES: USAGM Office of Human Resources, 330 Independence Ave. SW, 
Washington, DC 20237.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellona Fritschie, Business Review 
Coordinator, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4c1c2d6cdd0d7c7cccdc1e4d1d7c5c3c98ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462320342f3235252e2f2306333527212b68212930">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 382-7500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314, USAGM 
publishes this notice announcing the individuals who will serve as 
members of the PRB for a term of one year. The PRB is responsible for: 
(1) Reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior Executive 
Service and Senior Level members; and (2) making recommendations on 
other performance management issues, such as pay adjustments, bonuses, 
and Presidential Rank Awards. The names, position titles, and 
appointment types of each member of the PRB are set forth below:

1. Yolanda Lopez, Voice of America Director, Limited Term SES
2. Shawn Powers, Chief Strategy Officer, Career SES
3. James Reeves, Chief Information Officer, Career SES

    Dated: February 10, 2022.
Armanda Matthews,
Program Support Specialist, U.S. Agency for Global Media.
[FR Doc. 2022-03326 Filed 2-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Kimberly Renee ICON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3938

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
EX PARTE Christopher Lewis BARROW

CR-16-0199

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.