alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 59TH DISTRICT COURT OF GRAYSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 29th

day of May, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

TRACY RAY HASS, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00189-CR; Trial Court No. 061728

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 11th day of December, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11444 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ZACKARY IKAIKA BRYTON THOMPSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 111

- 1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Zackary Ikaika Bryton Thompson appeals the within

- guidelines 262

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of sexual exploitation of children by production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e). He argues th at his sentence was procedurally unreasonable , because the district court failed to address mitigating factors and did not sufficiently state reasons for the sentence, and substantively

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determin ed that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 5, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11444 Document: 00515106188 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/05/2019No. 18

- 11444

2 unreasonable, because it was greater than necessary to achieve the sen tencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) . Further, he contends that § 2251(a) is unconstitutional because the Commerce Clause did not grant Congress the power to enact the statute

. Thompson has not demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion b y imposing a procedurally or substantively unreasonable sentence. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. In these circumstances, the district court did not procedurally err by failing to explicitly address Thompson’s arguments for mitigation. See United States v. Becerril

- Pena , 714 F.3d 347, 351

- 52 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Sanchez , 667 F.3d 555, 568 ( 5th Cir. 2012). Moreover, the district court adequately stated reasons because a within

- guidelines sentence requires “little explanation.” United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005). As to substantive reasonableness, Thompson has not over come the presumption of reasonableness that applies to within

- guidelines sentences by showing that the sentence failed to account for the mitigating factors or represented a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. See United States v. Rashad , 687 F.3d 637, 644 (5th Cir. 2012)

. Finally, Thompson waived his claim that § 2251(a) is unconstitutional by entering an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Sealed Appellant , 526 F.3d 241, 242

- 43 (5th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-11444 Document: 00515106188 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/05/2019
STATE of Louisiana v. Willie PRICE, Jr.

NO. 2018-KH-0186

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 2018

Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Price v. State, 15-2338 (La. 3/24/16), 188 So.3d 1023.
Andre BAZIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0437

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jesus DEJESUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
T.G. v. RUSSELL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160458

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 31, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EX PARTE Martegus Jaraye JACKSON

CR-16-0612

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 15, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
Ingram HARPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D18-259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
...... ,· "



### L Olt :tS E.

### PEA~S'<f)IJ**CL~ ~~** **Q,l..\~"r~F:' ~PPSA\-.S**  MAy· Z5; Z.0/'5

### ~ 1 

# 3C11 -Oi

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIPJliNAL APPEALS

JUN 012015

Abet Acosta, Clerk



### I

### ~1\ve: VJR::t::lTEJJ 

## -ro AS.K, 

### FOR. f\s.&:.'STAIJC£. --rowAA.Ds**Cl"BTT\:r~~** .4T=RoM --rHE QOL\RT cF APPEA-LS**o~ ~f\lFoR.-.** 

MA.TICJ/J <llP !-low To OE;rMN, 

### A 

## Cofll OP 

## A l(Oif

WRIT OF 

### \-(1\BE_US 

### CoRft\S#

,_L FILED

### N\~ \(0'1 WRIT FRoM bAWSC>N

### S7AT~ TAXL;

_. -=t::.t-J**~LAtE** 

### Zt9e3 d.. 

## £MY 2oot.f- 

# ,-mt_ Wt\:rT**~o~C£RNs**



## ·. l11E t.A-rE 

# bss 0f 

## A PAR.ou:_

## ~~vocJ\T:rotJ**thR.r~q** 

# ·-

ArTF--R

### ~V.:tN~**~0** iEI\R.S. ct=' 

### A 3TI\TE.

### .J~xL**~t_~~E~k~£** AtJD RELE(\<;Eb OtJ

### \)A~LEdl**Ul~** 

## N\'l**\t\.~R\) ~~)**  

### N\ONli-\

REPORT 

### I Wf\S

### ~K[LJS:_D ·1\N!) NOT.:J-F:l_E-1)

### ~T LtiL

## ~EASON fOR 

### f2:ExiJ6

## -:r-~ \}Jf\S B£c-AUSE 

## =-c i4ID NfVfR

## -~l-\1)



## . A PARDL£ 

## HEM.:LN<a**~SPE<1-XFcN..LV** 

### fitttl{E**STI\T~** JAXL-

### ~ 

## Two YEARs l-1\TER 

## Mm 

# MV !Ef.EAS£.- 

### tiN"!:> 

### Mt>s• & :rN -:rf\:rL FoR



### \\-\£**~EI\RII\\G** 0 

### E"8J**-ntoo~~** -::c::.- HV\D

### ~N**-..t..~** 

## c.usroo'/**FcR~)lWo** YfttRS (; 

# ::r: AePRE(;LI\TE 

## VouR HELPq_**ItJFo~f()f\T.:rotJ** 

### oF 

## 1M I 

### De..-:#:**~-S3530I ~u"Cilt~R.Y** **«AB-15y~A~** StwrEtJ&-. 

### CUE Wrtl=-T**(fo1w~** 1\&)ltr**A.~NCE** 

## m WE_**~** 

### B**~** lf[E 

### &Af.D 

### o-F**Pt\~~NS** 1\ND f.ARoL£,

I**t~oB~~-d-lf-Stf bA.Lll\~~aumt.TX'** **~JDGE-: ~1\ROLD**  ENTz



### OR**~E_:r.TH DE~N**  

### tLVDE L. 

### GeES<**~~,** 

### .**&ft:cs~** t<i7<Aoss

·- ·**P.o~** 

### Box qooo

### -~£1J"D£Rsl>N**1f 75~53**
H. R. 6188 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 420 Highway 

17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Nancy Yount Childs Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NANCY YOUNT CHILDS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South 

Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Nancy Yount 

Childs Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Nancy Yount Childs Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
L.B., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2644

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
AMERICAP DIRECT, John D. Cohen & Clarissa M. Lewis-Cohen, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PARK EAST VENTURES, LLC, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Excellus O. HYLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D18-657

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Victor PERKINS, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 17-6836

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 24, 2017

Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor Perkins appeals from the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to vacate the November 6, 1992, order committing him to the custody and care of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Perkins,*No. 5:92-hc-00654-BR (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2017). We also deny Perkins’ motions for summary disposition, to appoint counsel, for default judgment, and for bail. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Ernest HARGETT, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2760

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

October 19, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jean LOUVERTURE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3970

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed May 8, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EX PARTE Maurice T. BULLOCK

CR-16-0796

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6188 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6188

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the ``Nancy 
                  Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NANCY YOUNT CHILDS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nancy 
Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Girlis H. SERRATT v. STATE

CR-16-0120

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 7, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
#### Ronnie Wallace LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank L. PERRY, Secretary, N.C. Dep’t of Public Safety, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6277

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 29, 2017

Decided: October 25, 2017

Jamie Theodore Lau, DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe Del-Forge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Wallace Long seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition on the ground 'that the petition contained an unexhausted, but not procedurally defaulted, Brady1 claim. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

*261We conclude that Long has made the requisite showing, and we therefore grant a certificate of appealability. Although the district court determin,ed that Long was attempting to assert a new, unexhausted *Brady*claim, Long unequivocally disclaimed, both before this court and the district court, any independent claim based upon newly discovered latent fingerprint evidence. Thus, Long did not present the district court with a mixed petition that required dismissal.2

We vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED*

1

. *Brady v. Maryland,*373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

2

. We do not address whether the newly discovered fingerprint evidence may be considered when examining Long’s exhausted *Brady*claim or whether that evidence so fundamentally alters Long’s exhausted *Brady*claim that it may not be considered when addressing the merits of Long’s petition. *Winston v. Kelly,*592 F.3d 535, 549 (4th Cir. 2010). We leave any such determination to the district court in the first instance.
Victor ESTEVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

Michael D. Weinstein of Michael D. Weinstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 7, 2021

No. 04-21-00197-CV

Graciela GARCIA and Jesus Garcia,

Appellants

v.

Roberto SALINAS, Jose Lozano, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-17-716-A

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ third motion for an extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED. 

Appellants’ brief filed on September 2, 2021 is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
EX PARTE Woodburck NOE

CR-16-0525

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 9, 2017 Reh. denied June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7462
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 05-7493
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS, Defendant - Appellant. No. 05-7508
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus- 2 - KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-02-70031) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Nos. 05-7462/7493, affirmed; No. 05-7508, dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel, motion for reconsideration, motion for bond pending appeal, motion for an evidentiary hearing, and motion to disqualify the United States Attorney. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court as to all complaints except the district court order denying bail pending appeal. SeeUnited States v. Cabiness , 4:02- CR-70031 (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 2005); United States v. Cabiness , 4:02- CR-70031 (W.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2005). Because the underlying appeals lack merit, the appeal from the denial of bail (No. 05-7508) is dismissed as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Nos. 05-7462/7493 - AFFIRMED No. 05-7508 - DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Strategic 
Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC, 
pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-OH-22-001, Occupational 
Safety and Health Education and Research Centers (ERC).
    Dates: March 22-23, 2022.
    Times: 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Video-Assisted Meeting.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Michael Goldcamp, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 1095 Willowdale 
Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, Telephone: (304) 285-5951; 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b767c54575f585a564b7b585f58155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fbb6bc94979f989a968bbb989f98d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the 
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices 
pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2022-03273 Filed 2-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>