- 

### Federal Register 

## I Vol. 44, No. 232 1 Friday, November 30, 1979 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81
(FRL1349-4; Docket No. OAQPS-79-09]

National VisibilityGoal for Federal Class I Areas; Identification of Mandatory Class I Federal Areas Where VisibilityIs an Important Value
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., ACTION: Final action.
SUMMARY: Section 169A(a)(2) of the Clean Air Abt'requires EPA to
- promulgate, after consultation with the Secretary of the Department ofthe Interior (DOI), a list ofmandatory class I Federhl areas where visibility is an important value. On February 12, 1979 (44 FR 8909) the Environmental

- Protection Agency (EPA) proposed, after consultation with DOI, a list of

. mandatory class I Federal areas where visibility is an important value.'EPA is today promulgating the proposed list without a change. EFFECTIVE DATE: November 21, 1979. ADDRESSES: This promulgation and background information relevant to it

are available forpublic inspection during normal business hours at the EPA Central Docket Section CDocketNo. OAQPS-79-09] Room 2903B, 401 Mvf Street S.W.,.Washington, D).C. 20460. A reasonable fee maybe charged for copying. FOR FURTHER INFORMATIO CONTACT: Johnnie L. Pearson, Standards Implementation Branch, Control Programs Development Division; Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards, Environmental Protection Agency (MD-- 15), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. Phone: (919) 541-5497. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 added Section 169A. to the Clean Air Act. In this Section, Congress established, as a national goal, "the prevention ofany future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory class I Federal

areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution." Mandatory class I Federal areas are composed ofall international parks, all national wilderness areas and-memorial parks which exceed 5,000 acres in size and all national parks which exceed 6,000 acres in size. These areas must have been in existence on the date ofenactment of the 1977.amendments and may notbe redesignated. There are 158 such areas.

,An iniftfal step in developingprograms which make reasonable progress toward meeting this national goal is set out in Section 169A(a)(2), which requires that DOL in consultation with otherFederal Land Managers, review all mandatory class I Federal areas and identify those

areas where visibility is an important value. EPA, after consulting'with DOL must promulgate a list ofmandatory class I Federal areas in which it determines visibility is an important value. On October 14, 1977 (42 FR 55280) DOI published notice seeking public comment on itspreliminary determination that 153 ofthe 159 mandatory class I Federal areas possessed visibility as aninportant value. These 153 areas were identified by a task force, ofwhichEPA was a consulting member, that created and applied the following criteria:

1. Does the legislation for thearea indicate that scenic value was an important consideration for establishing the area? or,

Is the area possessed of scenic values that are-important to public enjoyment?

2.Are sceniovalues ofthe area primarilyin the form ofpanoramic background, intermediate or foreground views?

3. Do natural sources of visibility impairment seriously affect the ability of the public to appreciate visibility as an important value?

4.For those areas in which natural

sources ofvfsibility impairment seriously affect public appreciation of scenicvalues, is the magnitude of scenic value sufficient to warrant protection from man-caused sources?

Theprocessby which the criteria was applied to each Federal mandatory class I area involved (1) the participation: of the individual park superintendents and forest rangers who surveyed each area, and (2) a review ofthe park superintendents' and forest rangers' recommendations by the regional staffs responsible for the class I areas in their region and by the Washington, D.C. staff who consulted with the regional staffs. Through this consultation process, each of the 158 mandatory-class I Federal

areas was evaluated and tested against the criteria.

-- Review and analysis ofpublic, comments and DOI's preliminary findings produced one change in the criteria used to identify whether visibility is an important value. The Character ofthe Scenic Values (Step 31 used in the logic network for evaluating class I areas was changed so that only those areas which possess no sweeping 

### view ofbackground features, panoramas, or views ofmiddleground or background features would fail tobe identified to possess visibility as an important'value in this step. Underithe preliminary criteria, an area was' identified as not possessing visibility as an important value ifviews were primarily, or mostly, offoreground features less than one mile distant, although one ofmore background or middleground view.or panorama was present. The one-mile cutoff Is used because it is the shortest distance at which a broad perception ofan area is possible,,i.e., it allows an individual to observe overall patterns, shapes, and textures of the area. The one-mile cutoff is consistent with definitions of foreground, middleground, and background presented in the USDA, Forest Service Landscape Management Book, Volume I.

The application of the revised criteria identified three areas which possess visibility as an important value In addition to the 153 areas so Identified In the preliminary findings. The three additional areas are: Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky; Moosehorn Wilderness, Maine; and Medicine Lake Wilderness, Montana. DOI published this final list of156 areas on February 24, 1978 (43FR 7721).

On February 12, 1979, EPAproposed to list these same 156 areas. EPARevieW

From the earliest stages of development, EPA followed DOI's progress in developing and applying the criteria by which the list ofclass I visibility protection areas was produced. EPA also reviewed'the criteria and the comments obtained from, public meetings conducted throughout the country. Finally, the workbooks, containing narratives provided by Federal Land Managers, were reviewed with particular attention paid to the logic behind the application ofcriteria to specific areas and the extensive public comment received. It is EPA's judgment that theFederal class I areas meeting visibility protection requirements as determined by DOI are correct. Therefore, EPA is promulgating the proposed list without any changes In designations. It should be noted, however, that the February 12, 1979 proposal ofthis action (44 FR 89009) contained an error. Although Minarets Wilderness in California was evaluated
ashaving visibility as an important value, it was inadvertently omitted from the February 12, 1979 proposal and is properly listed in this promulgation. SinceMinarets Wilderness was Included on the twice published DOI list 69122

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69122 1979

### Federal Register 

## I Vol. 44, No. 232 / Friday, November 30, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

ofpotentially eligible areas, and since EPA's proposal specifically mentioned the only two negative identifications on that list. EPA does notbelieve it is necessary to repropose Minarets Wilderness and as such promulgates it at this time. Significant Comments

Both written comments and comments, from the public hearings conducted by DOI were considered in this promulgation. The significant comments
are discussed below.

Most speakers at the public hearings disagreed with the premise that a mandatory class Iarea could exist where visibility is not an important value. The commenters felt the intent of Congress and the national goal was to include all mandatory class IFederal
areas in the visibility protection program.

EPAhas found thatvisibility is an important value in 156 out of158 mandatory classI areas. The two wildernesses which were shown not to have visibility as an important value (Rainbow Lake, Wisconsin and Bradwell Bay,Florida) did not meet the criteria established byDOL In requiring
an analysis ofthe visibility values in all mandatory classI-Federal areas before determining whether visibility protection isnecessary, Congress clearly didnot necessarily intend that visibility be identified as-animportant value in all class I areas. See also HR. Rep. No. 95-294, 95th Cong., ist Sess. 205 

### (1977).

The greatest number ofcomment letters received pertainedto the lack of information concerning the impact of listing an area as one where visibility is
an important value. The* commenters expressed concern over the extent of social and economic impacts on communities surrounding class I areas. Commenters felt that therewas aneed to'evaluate more fully the impact of natural sources, investigate the existing air quality in and around class Iareas, and list sources which may potentially be required to installBest Available Retrofit Technology (BART). Specifically, two commenters opposed the designations ofMount Zirkel Wilderness, Rawah Wilderness, and Rocky Mountain National Park as areas where visibility is an important value due to the uncertainty ofhow the designations would affect the local economy. In addition, groups in the Pacific Northwestprotested the reduction or abolition ofprescribed burning. One commenter expressed the
same concern forforest products industries located near Cohutta Wilderness, Okefenokee Swamp, and Wolf IslandWilderness.

As many commenters recognize, to assess, at the present time, the impact of
afuture regulatory program under Section 169A isneither possible nor required by law.In Section 169A Congress explicitly called for the listing ofareas subject toregulation far in advance ofthe time whenEPA must develop specific regulations for the States which contain guidelines and techniques formaking reasonable progress towards thenational goal. Congress revealed its sensitivity to the economic impact ofany Section 169A regulations bymaking a cost and energy analysis partof the control technology standard and providing the possibility for exemption to that standard. However, there is no indication that economic impacts be solnehow considered-in advance of the regulations themselves-In compiling the Section 169A(a)(2) list. Aregulatory analysis isbeing prepared and these issues, along with those pertaining to prescribed burning, will be dealt with there. This analysis will also address the elements ofeconomic impact set out in Section 317.

The secondmost mentioned commbnt
was the subjective nature of the evaluation criteria. Two commenters felt key terms such as "important." "scenic value," "public appreciation," and "seriously affect" should have been defined prior to the evaluations. Other comments expressed concern over the dependence of the criteria upon highly vafiable humanjudgments, and felt a need to measure objectively the visibility ofvistasfrom their associated viewpoints and incorporate such measurements Into the evaluation.

While EPA acknowledges that in
some respects the established criteria
are subjective, it believes that the subjectiveness ofthese evaluations is to some extent inherent in the task of assigning "value" to the visibility ofan area. Congress required DOI and EPA to accomplish this task ina very short time and did notanticipate that technical problems involved in objective measurements ofvisibility impairment wouldbe solved before the task could be completed. Since a technicalbase broad enough to more quantitatively
assess the class I area evaluations was not available in the time frame specified by Congress, criteria agreed on byEPA and DOI were developed which established certain priorities and were readily available foruse byFederal Land Managers. Sections 165(d) and 169A which, among other things, charge Federal Land Managers with an "affirmative responsibility" to protect visibility values, together showthe great weight Congress intended the judgment ofFederal LandManagers tohave. A technical base foruse in future regulations inresponse to Section 169A Is now being established which will quantify and define many ofthe
concerns mentioned above.

One commenter,noting that the effect ofthe listing willnotbe precisely known until the Section 169A regulations are proposed, suggested thatpromulgation ofthe final listbe postponed-until after the hearing on the proposed regulations and that the public record be left open during the interim.EPA believes such an approach would be contrary to the Congressional scheme-clearly set out in Section 169A-ofpromulgating the list ofareas in advance, even ofthe report to Congress containing the technical outline for the eventual visibilityregulations.

This does not mean, however, that future public comment andits consideration byEPA as to the specific visibility objectives, values, and important vistas ofeach areais precluded. EPA recognizes that the future rulemaking under Section 169A will require such additional areaspecific Snalysis. At EPA'srequest. DOI andthe Forest Service have conducted a preliminary analysis ofthe range of scenicvistas, thenature ofvisual values and a preliminary estimate ofthedegree ofexisting natural andman-made visibility Impairmentfound in each area. EPA expects that the futureproposal of visibility regulations will require States and Federal Land Managers to develop such additional area-specific assessments. Both this process, andthe proposal itself.willbe subject to public comment. 'o the extent that further comment and additional analysis (or anything else) affects the basis for the list. EPA will propose appropriate revisions.

Several comments asserted that Section 169A islimited to vistas wiqhin theboundaries ofmandatory class I Federal areas, and. accordingly,that the EPA and DOI lists aredefective because there is no indication that this alleged "jurisdictional limit" was observed by the persons engagedIn the identification process. This observation overlooks DOrs specific discussion ofthisissue in ItsFebruary 24.1978, notice (43FR 7721, 7724). DOI acknowledged the dispute as to whethervistas without the boundaries ofthe subject class I areas areprotected, but noted that it neednot reach theissue because the 156 mandatory class I Federal areas identified were based on views within 69:123

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69123 1979

### 69124- Federal Register'/ Vol. 44, No. 

### 23 / Friday, November 30, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

the areas-seen from within the areas. The two areasnot identifiedpossessed
no out-of-area vistas which woul& otherwise qualify them forthe list.

EPA alsorecognizes thatthere is an issue as tothe asserted "jurisdictional limits" of Section 169A. EPAis, announcing its preliminary position and soliciting comments on a number of issues in theAdvance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,published elsewhere in this Federal Register For the purposes ofthislistunder'Section. 169(a](2], however, EPAhas adopted DO's, approach and considered only vistas within an area as observedfrom a location within,the same area.The two mandatory class IFederal areas identified.as not possessfngvisilility as an importantvalue do nothave out-ofpark vistas which, ifconsidered, would warrant theirlisting.

-Both written comments and those received from public hearings felt criterion 4 (for those areas in which, natural sources ofvisibilityimpairment seriously affect public appreciation of scenic values, is the magnitude ofthe scenic value sufficient to warrant protection fromman-made causesl wasvague. One written,comment suggested the elimination ofcriterion 4,calling it "inappropriate and illogical." This commenter feltthatcontrolling manmade sources when natural sources'of impairment degrade the scenic value uuch thatpublic enjoyment is ,diminished isnot valid. Onrthe other hand, comments obtained from the" publichearings expressed theopinorr that man-made pollution cart significantly increase visibility inipairment even when natural sourcesare present.

It is important- to consider thatwhile naturalvisibility impairment does exist in someclassI areas, itwillnot only' vctryin magnitude, but also in duration. The criterion was established to recognize natural sources ofimpairment which maybe ofconsequence, but it also allows areaswith particularly significant scenicvaluesprotection from man-made impairment While the magnitude andduration ofnatural impairment maybegreat,the imposition ofman-made impairment can significantlyreducethe visual appreciation of an area eventhough it is experiencing some form ofnatural visibility impairment.Therefore. EPA agrees withthe comment thatever in
areas with substantial natural visibility impairment, important visibility values existand cambeenhanced by controlof man-made sources ofvisibility' impairment.

DOI public hearings received
numerous comments,onthe importance of nighttime sky 'viewing.Many 

### commenters felt this should.be included in the criteria to evaluate the importance ofvisibility to a class I area. EPA acknowledges that nighttime skis,are
an importantpart ofthewildnerness: experience, especially to campers,and backpackers. EPA feels thatthis aspect
can be considered avisibility value for

use in establishing visibility objectives by theFederal LandManagers. Itis not considered, however, a major factor in distinguishing between class I areas or evaluating the importance ofvisibility in

one class.I area as oppose&to another. Indeed EPAreceived no written ,comments suggesting that the two areas excluded from thelistpromulgated, today should havebeen.included because oftheir nighttime skies.

Several comments received discussed individual wildernesses and reasons why they should or shouldnotbe included as areas warranting visibility protection. Whilemost questions are answered in.the evaluations ofthe workbooks, a few will be discussed here.

Although Brigantine Wilderness is used primarily forfshing and bfrdwatching, the"scenIc value ofthe wilderness cannot be separated from.the total enjoyment ofthe park. Even though fishing is the primary attraction, the views one sees are part ofthe iotal experience which the public-has come-to enjoy. Therefore, visibility is an importantvalue contributingtd the total enjoyment ofthis area'.

Breton.Wilderness was another area for which one commenterurged deletion. Er response to the comment that the area is noteligible because of sizelimitations. EPA has noted that DOI promulgated Breton at5000 acres and it therefore meets the sizerequirements setby Congress. Thecomment also mentioned the poormaintenance of thearea.Poormaintenance, however,is irrelevant to whether Congress intended: visibility to be protected.in the nation's wildlife areas.BretonWilderness meets the requirements set forth-in the criteria, and it is EPA's responsibility.,to .acknowledge this-and designate it as an

area warrantingvisibilityprotection.

In the preliminary evaluation by the National Park Service, Mammoth Cave National7Park was excluded from the list ofareas having visibility as an importantvalue. Evidencewas presented attthepublic hearings which supported the inclusion oftheparkin the list.This evidence includedlegislative history which.showed the surface area was a major consideration. in the designation ofMammoth Cave as a nationalpark and.as a resultthfis park

was proposed by DOI and EPA. 

### Comment was also received concerning the! independence ofEPA's evaluation ofclass I areas under consideration forvisibility protection. One commenter felt."EPA shouldnot parrot DOI'slist" and another commenter did not want EPAto "rubber stamp" DOa's designations. EPA has, however, conducted an independent and thorough: evaluation oftheworkbooks submitted.bytheFederal Land Managers andhasi takeninto consideration.comments supplied at the public hearings held around the country.

Numerous other written and oral comments,werereceived which concerned the upcomingregulations. These commenters did not object,to the list, butwere more concerned with the potenti limpact- it would cause. These questions will be reviewed and discussed in theregulatory procedure under Sections 165 

### and 169A ofthe Clean Air Act.

This promulgation isissued under the authority granted in Sections 101(b)(1), 110, 169A(a](2), and 301(al of the Clean AirAct as amended (42U.S.C. 74 ]b). 7410, 7491(a](Z]. 7601(al.

Rated- November 21, 1979. Iouglas M.Costle, A inistraton


### PART 81-DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES



### Part 81 ofChapter I.Title,40 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations is amended by adding Subpart D as follows: SubpartD-tdentflication of Mandatory Crass t Federat Areas Where Visibility Is sn ImportantValue.

e= 81.400 81.401. 81.402 81.403. 81.404 81.405 81.405 81A07 81.408 81.409: 81.410 81.411 81.412. 81.413 81.414 81.415 81.41& 81.417 81.418 8:.419 81.420 81.421 81.422 81.423 81.424 81.425 81.426 Scope. Alabama. Alaska. Arizona. Arkansas. California. Colorado. Florida. Georgia. Hawaii. Idaho. Kentucky'. Louisiana. Maine. Michigan. Minnesota. Missouri. Montana. Nevada. New Hampshire. Newlersey. New Mexico. North Carolina. North Dakota. Oklahoma. Oregon. South Carolina.

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69124 1979

### Federal Register 

## I Vol. 44, No. 232 / Friday, November 30, 1979 / Rules and Regulations 69125

81.427 South Dakota. 81.428 Tennessee. 81.429 Texas. 81.430 Utah. 81.431 VermonL 81.432 Virgin Islands. 81.433 Virginia. 81.434 Washington. 81.435 West Virginia. 81.436 Wyoming. 81.437 New Brunswick, Canada.

Authority.-Seds. 101(b) (1), 110, 169A(a)(2), and 301(a) of the Clean AirAct as amended (42U.S.C. 7401(b), 7410, 7491(a)(2), 7601(a)). Subpart D-dentification of Mandatory Class IFederal Areas Where Visibility Is an Important Value
§ 81.400 Scope.

SubpartD, §§81.401 through 81.437 lists those mandatory Federal Class I areas, established under the Clean Air Act-Amendments of 1977, where the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, has determined visibilityto be an important value.The 

### following listing ofareaswhere visibility is an important value represents an evaluation of all 

### international parks (IP), national wilderness areas (Wild) exceeding 5,000 acres, national memorial parks (NMP) exceeding 5,000 acres, andnational parks (NP) exceeding 6,000 acres, in existence on August 7,1977. 

### Consultation by EPA with the Federal Land Managers involved: the Department of Interior (USD1), NationalPark Service (NPSj,and Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS); and the -DepartmentofAgriculture (USDA), Forest Service (FS). §81.401 Alabama.

PubLc law Federa land Area nare Acreage estatlshing manager
S-9sey Wild 12.646 93-622 USDA-FS

§ 81.402 Alaska.

Pulc Law Federal land Area name Acreage estabig mager
Being Sea WId- 41.113 91-622 USDI-FWS Mount McKinley NP_ 1.949,493 64-353 USDI-NPS Simeonof Wild

- 25.141 94-557 USDI-FWS TuxedrniWid 6.402 91-504 USDI-WS

§ 81.403 Arizona.

Public Law Federal land

- Area name Acreage ealashing Manager

Chcahua National

Monurnent WildChcahua Wld Galiuro VWddGrand Canyon UP..- Mazat;1 l--

- Mount BaldyWildForst Petrified Foreat NP..... 9.440 18.000 52717 1,176.913

205.137

6.975 93.493 94-567 88-577 88-577 65-277 88-577 91-504 85-58 USD1-UPs USDA-FS USDA-FS USD-4IS USDA-FS USDA-FS USDI-NPS Pubic Law Federal land Ara na Aceg 

## -d")MePine Mountain Wid- 2D.061 92-2 USDA-S Saguaro Wild _- 71.400 94657 USOD-FS Sierra AnchaWild. 20.0 88-577 USDA-FS Suporstiton Wld

- 124.117 8W-577 USOA-FS Sycamor Canyon Wild 47.757 92-241 USa-FS

§81.404 Arkansas.

Pubkilaw Federal land Area name Acreage estakig maager
Camey ek WCdrook

_ 14344 93-822 USOA-FS Upper BuffaloWid-_ 9.912 93-22 USDA-FS

81.405. CalIfornia.

Area name Acreage Putft Law Federal land

Agus T21A 15.934 93-.... USDA-PS.

Ca'bou Wild. 19,080 88-87"/__ USDA-FS. Cucanonga 9022 86-77.- USDA-S.

Desolation 63.469 91-82- USOA-S.

Dome Land 62.206 88-"77 USD-S EngWant wld. 104.311 93-32- USDA-S Ho seo-$.. 47.916 85,5-87.. USDA-PS John Mui 484,673 W-77_ USOA-PS.

wil Joshua Tree 429.690 94-67_ USD-PS

WaL KaserV,d..- 22.45 94-M-7 US1PS lrrgs Canyon 459.994 7&-424- US06 NP. Lassen 105.800 64-184-.. USP -.

volcanic NP. Lava Beds 25.640 92-493 -_ USD S

WA(L Mable 213.743 88-7" UDAMountain
Minarets Wd. 109484 -77 USDAMoketume 50.400 85-7

_ USDA-FS.

WILi PinnaclesWild 12,952 9448W -. USD6-UPS PointReyes 25,37o S4-544.... USD6-oPS.

Wild. 94-5W7 Redwood NP. 27.792 90-545- USD. SanGaiel 38.137 90-318 -. USDA-S.

Vld. San Gorgonio 34.644 88-77 USDA-FS.

San Jacnlo 20,564 86 577- USAWI& San Rated 142.722 90-271- USDAwild. Sequoia NP... 3K8642 26 StatL9U7 USD6-NI'S. (51st Cong.). South Warner 68,507 86-577 USAThousand 15,695 88-577

- USOA-FS

Lakes Wild. VentanaWid. 95,152 91-58_ USOA-MS. Yolla-olly. 109.091 88-577_ USDA-FS.

Yosernit NP-- 759.172 58-49- USOD-NIS.

§81.406 Colorado.

Area nme Acreage Pubic Law Federal land W" 'nanager

Black Canyon of the

Gunnison WWL Eagles Nest Wild_ FlatTops Wild

- GreatSand unesW'd LaGstaWd Wl- Maroon BellsSnowmas Wild11,160 LSD6-N 133,910 94-352 USDA-FS. 23.30 4-148 USDA-S 33.450 94-557 USD-S 48.436 88-577 USDA-FS.

71.060 68-577 USDA-PS Area trm Acreage Puic: Law Federal land estatb irg nager

Mea Verde NP -- 51,488 .59-353 USo-UPS. mot i ra w 72.472 88-577 USARawahWid- 26.674 83-77 USDA-FS. RockY McwahNP-- 353.138 63-238 USDNIPS. Wn~ache Vad. 400=90 93-=3 USDA-PS. West Elkl 

## ~d

_ 61.412 88-6"77 USOA-FS.



### §81.407 Florida.

Aream 're Acreage Pubcl* a w Federal land estabbal*ng manager

Cah&36aOhtkaWild 23,3o S4-657 USD-FWS.
E"r s NP-.. 1.397,429 73-267 USDk4S St. Marks Wld 17.745 93-632 USDtWS

§81.408 Georgia.

Am an. Acreage PubcLaw Federal Land 

## -stk* Maagm

Cdxxwd _- 33=7 93-22 -USDA-FS Okaknokee 1Wid- 343,85 s329 USm.Fm Wc klWand Wild 5.126 93-632 USDIfWS.

§ 81.409 HawaLl

Ararrw Acreage Pubichma Federalland 

## -alhn manager

Haleakala NP_ 27.208 87-74 USD-4PS. Hawa8 Vol arm

. 217029 64-171 USD6-PS

§81.410 Idaho. -

Ame Hare Acreage PubicLaw Federal Land ESstiv~ UMger

Oilersofth 43,243 91-504

__ USD1-N&S.

Moon VS& HFAf Canyon 8380 94-199-_ USOA-MS

W~ild

. SaloothWild 216383 9-400__ USDA-PS. Salaay- 988770 88-677-. USDA-MS

Yelowslone 31.488 17StaL 32-

NP % (42ndCcrg.). USD6-NS.

a el Canyom Widemes19270acres overalL ofwhffa 10M.90 acres ame Ina

Oreona and 83.0 acresare im Idaho, bSdwaY itlterrootWilderness.24wo. acres oreralt~of whichOft7=0 aces are I Idaho and z50 acres arelix

cyelows toe Nations! Par 2.219=3 acres overal of whIchZ =5 Acres are in Wymin&167.8=4 acres are in .6fntarna.and31.48 acres are inIdaho. §81.411 Kentucky.

Area am Acreage Pub:c law Federal land
e manager

Manrroe Cave NP._ 51303 69-283 USES-NS.

§ 81.412 Louisiana.

Area m Acreage Putic law Federalland G$Mbt*.

_ manager

Brelon Wid 5.000+ 93-m3 USD(-EwS.

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69125 1979

### 69126 Federal Register 

## / Vol. 44, No. 232 / Friday, November 30, 1979 / Rules and Regulations

§ 81.413 Maine;

Area name Acreage" Public law Federal land establishing manager

Acadia NP................. 37,503 65-278 USDI-NPS. Moosehom Wild

.......... 7.501 USDI--WS. (Edmunds Unit)...... (2,782) 91-504 (Baring Unit)

.............. (4,719) 93-632

N § 81.414 Michigan.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager
Isle Royale NP. 542.428 71.-835 USDI-NPS. Seney Wild............. 25,150 91-504 USDI-FWS.

§81.415 Minnesota.

-

Area name ACreage Public law Federal land esiablishing manager Boundary Waters

Canoe Area Wild.- 747.840 99-577 USDA-FS. Voyageurs NP .......- 114,964 99-261 USDI-NPS.

§ 81.416 Missouri.

Area name Acreage Public Law Federal land establishing manager
Hercules-Glades Wild. 12315 94-557 USDA-FS. Mingo Wild..........

-- 8,000 94-557 USDI-fWS.

§ 81.417 Montana.

Area name Acreage Public Law

- Federal land establishing manager

Anaconda. 157.603 88-577.- USDA-FS.

Pintlar Wil Bob Marshall 950,000 88-577..-." USDA-FS.

Wild. Cabinet 94,272 88-577

.... USDA-FS.

Mountains Wid. Gates of the 28,562 88-577.... USDA-FS.

Mt Wild. Glacier NP.... 1.012.599 61-171--. USDI-NPS. Medicine Lake 11.366 94-557- USDI-FWS.

Wild. Mission 73,877 93-632.-- USDE-FS.

Mountain Wild. Red Rock 32,350 94-557.... USDI-FWS.

Lakes Wild. Scapegoat 239.295 92-395.- USDA-FS.

Wild. Selway. 251,930 88-577..... USDA-FS.

Bitterroot Widd*. U. L Bend '20,890 94-557..... USDI-FWS.

Wild. Yellowstone 167,624 17 Stat 32 USDI-NPS.

NP b (42nd Cong.).

aSelwoy-Blitterroot Wilderness, 1.240.700 acres overall, of which 0a8,770 acres are in Idaho and251.930acres are in Montana.

bYellowstone National Park. 2219,737 acres overall of which 2,020.625acres are in Wyoming. 167,624acres are in Montana,and31,488 acres are inIdaho.
§81.418 Nevida. "

Area name -Acreage Public Law Federal land estabui~dng manager

Jarbldge Wild........, 64,667 88-577 USDA-FS. § 81.419 New,Hampshire.

Area name Acreage Public Law Federal land establishing manager

Great GulfWild....... 5,552 88-577 USDA-FS. Presidential Range-Dry'

RiverWild............. 20,000 93-622 USDA-FS.

§ 81.420 New Jersey

Area name Acreage Public Law Federal land establishing manager
_BlrigantineWld...... 6,603 93-632 USDI-FWS.

§81.421 New Mexico

Area name Acreage Public Law Fedelal land establishing manager

Bandelier Wild-........ 23,267 94-567' USDI-NPS. Bosque delApache

Wild.......... 80,850 93-632 USDI-FWS. Carlsbad Caverns NP- 46,435 71-216 USDI-NPS. Gila Wild............ 433.690 88-577 USDA-FS. Pecos Wild-.......... 167.416 88-577 USDA-FS. -Salt Creek Wild.__8.. , 8500 91-504 USDI-FWS. San Pedro ParksWild. 41,132 88-577 USDA-FS. Wheeler Peak Wild-- 6,027 88-577 USDA-FS. White Mountain Wild...- 31,171 88-577 USDA-FS.

§81'425 Oregon.

Area name Acreage Publiclaw Federal land. establishing manager

Crater Lake NP

....... 160.290 57-121 USDANPS. Diamond Peak Wild.-.... 36,637 88-577 'USDA-FS. Eagle CapWild...... 293.476 88-577 USDA-FS. Gearhart Mountain

Wild.

........... 18.709 .88-577 USDA-Ft. Hells Canyon Wild._ 108,900 94-199 USDA-FS. Kalmipsls Wild..... 76,900 88-577 USDA-FS. Mountain Lakes Wild..-, 23,071 88-577 USDA-FS. Mount Hood Wild_.." 14.160 88-577 USDA-FS. Mount Jefferson Wild. 100,206 90-548 USDA-FS. Mount Washington

Wild

.................... 46,116 88-577 USDA-FS. Strawberry Mountain

Wild

................ 33,003 88-577 USDA-FS. Three Sisters Wild....... 199.902 88-577 USDAFS.

a Hells Canyon Wilderness. 192.700 acres overall, of which 108,900 acres are In Oregon. and 83,800 acres are In Idaho.

§ 81.426 South Carolina.

7 Area name Acreage' Public law Federal land establishing manager Cape RemainWild..... 28,000 -93-632 USDI-FWS.

§ 81.427 South Dakota.
Area name Acreage Public law Federal land estabishing manager

Badlands Wild.

.......... 64,250 94-567 USDI-NPS. Wind Cave NP...-...... 28.090 57-16 USDI-NPS. §81.428 Tennessee.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing nManager

Great Smoky

Mountalns NP

......... 241,207 6-268 USDI-NPS. Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock

Wildb

......................... 3,832 93-622 USDANPS.

a Joyce Kilmer.Sllckrock Wilderness. 14,033 acres overall, of which 1021 acresare in North Carolina. and 3.0b3 acres are in Tennessee. b Great Smoky Mountains National Park. 514,763 acres overall, ofwhich 273,551 acres are In North Carolina, and "41.207acres are In Tennessee,

§81.429 Texas.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal Land establishing Manager

Big Bend NP

................ 708,118 74-157 USDI-NPS. Guadalupe Mountains

NP.

............... 76,292 89-667 USDI-NPS

§ 81.430 Utah.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establtshing manager

Arches NP

................ 65,098 92-155 USDI-NPS. Bryce Canyon NP...-.... 35,832 68-277 USDI-NPS, Canyonlands NP

....... 337.570 88-590 USDI-NPS, Capitol Reef NP

........ 221,896 92-507 USDI-NPS. Zion NP................. 142462 68-3 USDI-NPS,

§ 81.431 Vermont

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager

Lye Brook Wild.......... 12,430 93-622 USDA-FS

§ 81.432 Virgin Islands.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager
Virgin Islands NP

.......... 12.295 84-925 USDI-NPS,

§ 81.433 Virginia.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager

James River Face Wild 8,703 93-622 USDA-FS, Shenandoah NP...... 190.535 69-268 USDI-NPS,

§ 81.434 Washington.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager
Alpine Lakes 303,508 94-357......... USDA-F

Wild. Glacier Peak 464,258 9-577

........... USDA-FS.

Wild. Goat Rocks t2680 88-577

........ USDA-FS.

Wild. Mount Adams 32,356 88-577........ USDA-FS.

Wild. Mount Raner 235,239 30s tal 993 USDI-NPS NP. (55th Cong.).

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69126 1979

### Federal Register / Vol. 44,

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establshing manager

-North 503,277 90-554

- USDI-NPS. Cascades NP. Olymprc NP_ 892,578 75-778

. USDI-NPS. Pasayten id. -505.524 90-544 USDA-FS.
§81.435 WestVirginia.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing mager

Dolly Sods Wkd._.. 10.215 * 93-622 USDA-FS. Otter CreekWid.:. 20,000 93-622 USDA-PS.

§ 81.436 Wyoming.

Area name -Acreage Public law Federal land establihing manager

BddgerWild. 392.160 88-77

- USDA-FS. Fidzpatrick 191.103 94-567.....-.. USDA-FS.

Wild. Grand Teton 305.504 81-787

- USD,-NPS.

NP. North 351.104 88-577

- USDA-PS.

Absaroka Wild. Teton Wild 557.311 SS-S77 USDA-PS. Washalde Wild 688.584 92-476

- USDA-PS. Yellowstone 2,020,625 17 Stat.32 USDI-NPS.

NP =

. (42d Cong.).

aYellowstoneNational Park.2 7219,37 acres overall,of which 2,o20,625 acres are inWyomin .167,624 acres are in Montana. and31,488 acres axe in Idaho.
§ 81.437 New Brunick, Canada.

Area name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager

Roosevelt Campobello

International Park- 2721

- 88-363 Notappliesbie.

§ 81.422 'North Carolina.

Area name Acreage, Public law Federal land estabishing manager

Great Smoky

Mountains NP *_ 273.551 69-268 USDI-NPS. Joyce Kilmer-Slickock

Wild b 10,201 93-622 USDA-FS. tinvlteGorge Wild- 7.575 68-577 USDA-FS. Shining RockWild- 13.350 88-577 USDA-FS. Swanguarter Wild 9.000 94-557 USDI-FWS.

aGreat Smoky Mountains National Park. 514.758 acres overall, of which273,'51 acresare in NorthCarolina. and 241.207 acres arein Tennessee.

b Joyce Kllmer-Slickrock Wilderness, 14.033 acres overalL ofwhich 10.201 acres are inNorth Carolina. and3.32 acres are inTennessee. § 81.423 North Dakota.

Area Name Acreage Public law Federal land establishing manager

LostwoodWild- ._- 557 93-632- USDI-WS. Theodore Roosevelt,

NMP, 69.675 80-38 USDI-NPS. 

### No. 232 /Friday, November 30, 1979 

## / Rules and Regulations

§81.424 Oklahoma.

Area Nuns Acreage P btw Federal lad

Wichita Mountans Wid 6900 91-504 USDI-WS.

[FR Do. 79-351 Filed 21-194 -Vt &A5 am] BILLING CODE 6580-01-1 

### 69127

HeinOnline -- 44 Fed. Reg. 69127 1979