alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stephanie Sarahi FIGUEROA-VILLEDA, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 15-60553 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 22, 2017

Kate Lesley Birenbaum, Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Petitioner

Lisa Joan Morinelli, Office of Immigration Litigation, Richard Mark Zanfardino, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

*167Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Stephanie Sarahi Figueroa-Villeda, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) dismissal of her appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). In that application, Figueroa-Villeda alleged that if she were to be removed to Honduras, she would be murdered, sexually assaulted, raped, or physically attacked by gang members. We generally review only the decision of the BIA but will review the IJ’s decision where it. affects the BIA’s reasoning. *Le v. Lynch,*819 F.3d 98, 104 (5th Cir. 2016).

To support her claim for asylum and withholding of removal, Figueroa-Villeda was required to show that she suffered persecution or has a well-founded fear of future persecution in Honduras on the basis of her membership in a particular social group. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i); *Sharma v. Holder,*729 F.3d 407, 411 (5th Cir. 2013). However, the particular social group that Figueroa-Villeda identified—unattended young females who do not have a strong male presence—was too amorphous and would not be perceived as a group by Honduran society; thus, the group lacked sufficient social distinction and particularity. *See Orellana-Monson v. Holder,*685 F.3d 511, 521-22 (5th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the BIA did not err in determining that Figueroa-Villeda was not eligible for asylum or withholding of removal because she was not a member of a protected social group. *See Hernandez-De La Cruz v. Lynch,*819 F.3d 784, 785-86 (5th Cir. 2016).

Moreover, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision to deny Figueroa-Ville-da’s claim for CAT relief. *See Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft,*303 F.3d 341, 353 (5th Cir. 2002). The evidence showed that the Honduran government has taken steps to combat gang violence and sexual exploitation. Though its actions may be imperfect and may not guarantee the safety of any particular individual, they sufficiently support the finding that the Honduran government would not acquiesce to any effort by gang members to harm Figueroa-Villeda. *See Ramirez-Mejia v. Lynch,*794 F.3d 485, 493-94 (5th Cir. 2015); *Tamara-Gomez v. Gonzales,*447 F.3d 343, 350-51 (5th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raul CESARIO-MENDO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40761 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed July 5, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Raul Cesario-Mendo, Pro Se

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Cesario-Mendo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cesario-Mendo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2. In light of the nonreversible error in describing the offense as a marijuana offense, the judgment of the district court is REFORMED to show that Cesar-io-Mendo was convicted and sentenced for possession of five kilograms or more of cocaine with intent to distribute. *See, e.g., United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,*564 F.3d 357, 369 (5th Cir. 2009).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47,5.4.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class         Interest         Principal         Losses            Balance
<S>             <C>              <C>               <C>                <C>
A1           6416228.75       6803051.92                0      1225112867.26
A2               418250                0                0           80304000
A3            235083.36                0                0           45136000
A4            822208.32                0                0          157864000
APO                   0         80958.16                0        18339493.39
AR               325.67              100                0                  0
B1            166179.11         29291.02                0        31877099.76
B2             33227.51          5856.74                0          6373826.5
B3              20767.2          3660.45                0         3983641.56
B4              20767.2          3660.45                0         3983641.56
B5              8306.88          1464.19                0         1593456.64
B6             12480.74          2020.39           179.48         2394097.93


</TABLE>
EX-10.36





 Exhibit 10.36 

NOTE: PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT INDICATED BY [****] ARE SUBJECT TO A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST AND HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS EXHIBIT. COMPLETE,
UNREDACTED COPIES OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AS A PART OF THIS COMPANY’S CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST. 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

CONTRACT MANUFACTURING AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Contract Manufacturing Agreement is entered into as of the date of the
last signature below (the “First Amendment Effective Date”) by and between RTI Surgical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“RTI”) and A&E Advanced Closure Systems, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (“A&E”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement (as defined below). 

Recitals 

A.    A&E and RTI entered into a Contract Manufacturing Agreement on August 3, 2017 (the
“Agreement”). 
 B.    The Parties wish to incorporate additional Products to Schedule 1 of the
Agreement. 
 Agreement 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the execution and delivery of this Amendment,
A&E and RTI agree as follows: 
 1.    Schedule 1. Schedule 1 to the Agreement is hereby amended to
add the following material numbers, material descriptions, and transfer fees: 
 [****] 

  

					
	RTI-A&E – First Amendment to Contract Manufacturing Agreement	  	 	Page 1 of 2	 















 NOTE: PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT INDICATED BY [****] ARE SUBJECT TO A CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST AND HAVE
BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS EXHIBIT. COMPLETE, UNREDACTED COPIES OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AS A PART OF THIS COMPANY’S CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST. 

 

 2.    Effect on the Agreement. Except as specifically amended
above, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment is being effected in accordance with Section 17.9 of the Agreement. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Party has caused this Amendment to be executed by its respective duly authorized representative as of the date set
forth below. 
  

									
	RTI SURGICAL, INC.	 		 	A&E ADVANCED CLOSURE SYSTEMS, LLC
					
	By:	 	/s/ Olivier Visa	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Scott P. Hickey
					
	Name:	 	Olivier Visa	 		 	Name:	 	Scott P. Hickey
					
	Title:	 	Vice President, OEM & Sports	 		 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
					
	Date:	 	11/20/2018	 		 	Date:	 	11/19/2018


  

					
	RTI-A&E – First Amendment to Contract Manufacturing Agreement	  	 	Page 2 of 2
Migael BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-504

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                          81,382
<SECURITIES>                                   378,514
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               557,984
<PP&E>                                         457,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,468
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,092
<OTHER-SE>                                     600,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   739,981
<SALES>                                         52,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,375
<CGS>                                           19,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,566
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (91,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (91,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (91,125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION





I, Jacky K. Anderson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grayson Bankshares, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 12, 2004

/s/ Jacky K. Anderson

Jacky K. Anderson

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(a) 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q 

OF PINNACLEDATA SYSTEMS, INC. 

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (the “Issuer”). This certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This certification accompanies the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006. 

I, Michael R. Sayre, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. 

Thiscertification is executed as of August 11, 2006.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Javier SANCHEZ-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-41293 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed May 31, 2017

Eileen K. Wilson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Javier Sanchez-Ramos, Pro Se

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

*183PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Javier Sanchez-Ramos appeals the 75-month above-guideline sentence that the district court imposed when he pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after having previously been deported. Sanchez-Ramos argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district court made a clear error in judgment when it balanced the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors.

We ordinarily consider a challenge to the substantive reasonableness of a sentence “by examining the totality of the circumstances under an abuse of discretion standard.” *United States v. Diaz Sanchez,*714 F.3d 289, 295 (5th Cir. 2013). When an error was not sufficiently preserved in the district court, however, we review for plain error only. *See United States v. Ellis,*720 F.3d 220, 224-25 (5th Cir. 2013). The parties dispute which standard applies, but we need not resolve that issue.

Despite Sanchez-Ramos’s assertions, there is no indication in the record that the district court failed to consider a factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or made a clear error in judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. *See United States v. Fraga,*704 F.3d 432, 440-41 (5th Cir. 2013); *Diaz Sanchez,*714 F.3d at 295. Although the court referred to the fact that his most recent conviction did not garner an enhancement, that was one of several aspects of Sanchez-Ramos’s criminal history that the court considered. Furthermore, the extent of any deviation was within the range of other sentences that we have affirmed. *See United States v. Gutierrez,*635 F.3d 148, 155 n.34 (5th Cir. 2011) (collecting cases). Sanchez-Ramos has not demonstrated that the district court committed any error, plain or otherwise. *See Fraga,*704 F.3d 432, 440-41. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                          TO SECTION 13 OR 15(B) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)      JANUARY 12, 1999
                                                 ---------------------------

                          WATERMARC FOOD MANAGEMENT CO.
            (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                                      TEXAS
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

            0-20143                                   74-2605598
    (Commission File Number)               (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

       11111 WILCREST GREEN, SUITE 350, HOUSTON, TEXAS             77042
          (Address of Principal Executive Offices)               (Zip Code)

                                 (713) 783-0500
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

                                 NOT APPLICABLE
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
<PAGE>
                      INFORMATION INCLUDED IN REPORT ON 8-K


ITEM 3.   BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP.

On January 12, 1999 Watermarc Food Management Co. ("Registrant") filed Voluntary
Petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on behalf of
Registrant and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Original Pasta Co. and Marco's
Mexican Restaurants, Inc. The proceeding filed on behalf of Registrant is styled
Watermarc Food Management Co., Debtor, Case Number 99-30427-H1-11. The
proceeding filed on behalf of The Original Pasta Co. is styled The Original
Pasta Co., Debtor, Case Number 99-30428-H2-11. The proceeding filed on behalf of
Marco's Mexican Restaurants, Inc. is styled Marco's Mexican Restaurants, Inc.,
Case Number 99-30429-H1-11. All proceedings were filed in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. The
proceedings will be jointly administered under Case Number 99-30427-H1-11. The
Debtors continue to operate their businesses as Debtors in Possession pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. 1107 and 1108.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                                WATERMARC FOOD MANAGEMENT CO.
                                                      (Registrant)

Date        JANUARY 15, 1999              By /s/ GHULAM M. BOMBAYWALA
                                                      (Signature)

                                          By    GHULAM M. BOMBAYWALA


                                          Title CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                      Ending
Class          Interest         Principal          Losses            Balance
<S>              <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
B1             269405.36          67963.77                0        49668413.35
B2             258689.29          65260.37                0        47692761.92
B3             107839.73          27205.09                0        19881668.69
B4              48489.09           12232.5                0         8939599.23
B5              26911.44           6789.02                0         4961477.57
B6               43195.6           8469.09          2428.01         7963673.57
I_A1          5962409.24       15621337.48                0      1085131140.73
I_A2           334424.97                 0                0           61740000
I_A3           829871.28                 0                0          153207000
I_A4            207031.5                 0                0           38221200
I_APO                  0            544.77                0          507351.05
I_AR                0.55               100                0                  0
II_A1         2241922.01        5345558.04                0       408547736.78
II_APO                 0           3185.03                0          426869.56


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000883982
<NAME> AVECOR CARDIOVASCULAR INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,187,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,879,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,299,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   240,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,596,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,869,000
<PP&E>                                      20,923,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,652,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,748,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,894,000
<BONDS>                                        161,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,819,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,748,000
<SALES>                                     35,277,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,277,000
<CGS>                                       20,448,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,581,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (107,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,803,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   648,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,155,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>