alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

 

I, Seth Grae, certify that:

 

| 1.                   | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightbridge Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| 2.                   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |   |
|                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |
| Date: March 30, 2018 | By:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | */s/ Seth Grae* |  |
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | Seth Grae |  |
|                      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | Principal Executive Officer |  |
#### Janis Sakae OKAWAKI, DPA, MA, MPA, JD, BA Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, Mike Taylor, Senior Vice President and General Manager; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16011

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 16, 2017

Janis Sakae Okawaki, Pro Se

Craig Kunio Shikuma, Esquire, Kobaya-shi Sugita & Goda, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee First Hawaiian Bank

Sarah T. Casken, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Corporation Counsel, City and County of Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee City and County of Honolulu

Austin F. McCullough, Torkildson, Katz, Moore, Hetherington & Harris, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee FCH Enterprises

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Janis Sakae Okawaki appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing sua sponte her action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a *615district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim. *Hebbe v. Filler,*627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Okawaki’s action because Okawaki failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible RICO claim. *See id.*at 341-42 (though pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); *Living Designs, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.,*431 F.3d 353, 361 (9th Cir. 2005) (elements of a civil RICO claim).

Okawaki’s motion (Docket Entry No. 11) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth R. MCGEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-1658

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 2, 2017

Filed: October 5, 2017

Anita L. Burns, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO (Laiñe Cardarel-la, Fed. Public Defender, on the brief), for appellant..

Adam L. Caine, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, for appellee.

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth McGee directly appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to a firearm offense pursuant to a plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court1 erred in applying an enhancement under the Guidelines.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the waiver is valid, applicable, and enforceable. *See United States v. Scott,*627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) *(de novo*review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); *United States v. Andis,*333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of a waiver, if defendant knowingly and' voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and waiver, and if enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues other than the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Jerry RIDGEWAY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1811

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 30, 2017

Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that the above styled appeal is hereby dismissed as moot.

SUAREZ, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000472 02-NOV-2018 08:32 AM
jcap_Ex10_26



		

			Exhibit 10.26

		





		
			AMENDMENT TO TERM LOAN AGREEMENT
		

		
			This Amendment to  Term Loan Agreement (“Amendment”) is made as of the 17th day of August, 2018, by and among FRANKLIN OWNER, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (the “Borrower”), and FIRSTBANK, a Tennessee state bank, whose address is 6815 Poplar Avenue, Suite 100, Memphis, Tennessee 38138 (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”). 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties entered into a certain Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, with respect to a Loan from Bank to Borrower in the amount of Seven Million One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($7,125,000.00) (the “Loan Agreement”); and
		

		
			WHEREAS, Section 8.1(g) of the Loan Agreement contained a capitalized term, "Key Bank Line," which had not been defined in the Loan Agreement.
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, the parties hereto agree as follows:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section 8.1(g) of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 




		
			(g)A default under the Credit Agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, that results in an acceleration of the outstanding obligations of the Guarantor, as borrower under the Credit Agreement, as the Credit Agreement may be amended from time to time.
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			As modified hereby, the Loan Agreement is ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.




		
			[Signature page follows]
		

		
			


		 


 


[Signature Page to Amendment to Term Loan Agreement]
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Bank have executed this Amendment, or have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above written.
		

		
			BORROWER:
		

		
			 
		

		
			FRANKLIN OWNER, LLC,  
		

		
			a Georgia limited liability company
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: FRANKLIN PARENT, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, its sole member and manager
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: JERNIGAN CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its managing member and manager
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC., a Maryland corporation, its managing member
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ Kelly Luttrell
		

		
			Name: Kelly Luttrell
		

		
			Title: SVP CFO
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			BANK:
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRSTBANK, a Tennessee state bank
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ Bill Harter
		

		
			Name: Bill Harter
		

		
			Title: Senior Vice President
Exhibit 18





PREFERABILTY LETTER REGARDING LIFO TO FIFO CHANGE IN INVENTORY ACCOUNTING





eOn Communications Corporation


4105 Royal Drive NW


Kennesaw, GA 30144





We have audited the consolidated financial
statements of eOn Communications Corporation as of July 31, 2002 and 2001, and for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2002, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our
report thereon dated August 29, 2002, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and an
explanatory paragraph concerning a change in accounting policy for certain inventories from the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Note
             to such consolidated financial statements contains a description of your adoption during the year ended July 31, 2002 of the change in accounting policy for certain
inventories. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.





Yours truly,





/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Atlanta, Georgia


August 29, 2002
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00317

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.R., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 231st District

Court

of Tarrant County (231

- 555534

- 14)

January 17, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
#### Ronald MCCLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant CROSSON; Officer Williams; Officer Hicks; Officer Walls, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-7175

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

*835Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting the Defendants an enlargement of time to answer his complaint or file a responsive pleading. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because the magistrate judge’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Jeffery Jarrell HICKS v. STATE

CR-16-0286

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 3, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Frederick Cains, Admitted on March 18, 1970, at a Term of the Appellate Division, Second Department.

[772 NYS2d 806]

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. *[See*230 AD2d 366 (1997).]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6100 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6100

      To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, including the 
    registration requirements of the Military Selective Service Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2023

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, including the 
    registration requirements of the Military Selective Service Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Selective Service Repeal 
Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT.

    (a) Repeal.--The Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3801 et 
seq.) is repealed.
    (b) Transfers in Connection With Repeal.--Notwithstanding the 
proviso in section 10(a)(4) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 
U.S.C. 3809(a)(4)), the Office of Selective Service Records shall not 
be reestablished upon the repeal of the Act. Not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the assets, contracts, 
property, and records held by the Selective Service System, and the 
unexpended balances of any appropriations available to the Selective 
Service System, shall be transferred to the Administrator of General 
Services upon the repeal of the Act. The Director of the Office of 
Personnel Management shall assist officers and employees of the 
Selective Service System to transfer to other positions in the 
executive branch.
    (c) Effect on Existing Sanctions.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, a person may not be denied a right, privilege, 
benefit, or employment position under Federal law on the grounds that 
the person, before the repeal of the Military Selective Service Act (50 
U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) by subsection (a), failed to present himself for 
and submit to registration under section 3 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 
3802).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K/A of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, David S. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 19, 2005 |  | /s/ David S. Lee       
|                    |  | David S. Lee           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer



In connection with this annual report
on Form 10-K/A of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, Stephen R. Bowling, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 19, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephen R. Bowling 
|                    |  | Stephen R. Bowling     
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 4394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1850]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Release of Airport Property: Orlando Executive Airport, Orlando, 
FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties 12.4 acres at the Orlando Executive Airport, 
Orlando, FL from the conditions, release certain properties from all 
terms, conditions, reservations and restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed 
agreement, dated August 9, 1961, between the subject airport and the 
Federal Aviation Administration. The release of property will allow the 
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority to dispose of the property for 
municipal purposes. The property is located south-southwest portion of 
airport property, adjacent to State Road 408, in Orange County, 
Florida. The parcels are currently designated as non-aeronautical use. 
The property will be released of its federal obligations for Fair 
Market Value. The fair market value of the parcels is estimated to be 
$2,243,160.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Greater Orlando Aviation 
Authority Offices at the Orlando International Airport and the FAA 
Airports District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments are due on or before February 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the Greater Orlando 
Aviation Authority Offices at the Orlando International Airport, and 
the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's request must 
be delivered or mailed to: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, Orlando 
Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, 
Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca R. Henry, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

W. Dean Stringer,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-1850 Filed 1-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**Exhibit 99.2**

Certificate Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher W. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ CHRISTOPHER W. WOLF  **Christopher W. Wolf****Senior Vice President and****Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)****November 13, 2002**     |
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6162 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 379 North Oates Street in Dothan, Alabama, 

as the ‘‘LaBruce ‘Bruce’ Tidwell Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6162 EH

1 SECTION 1. LABRUCE ‘‘BRUCE’’ TIDWELL POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 379 North Oates Street in 

5 Dothan, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘LaBruce ‘Bruce’ Tidwell Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘LaBruce ‘Bruce’ Tid11 well Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6162 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postwell Post Office Building’’. Dothan, Alabama, as the ‘‘LaBruce ‘Bruce’ Tid- al Service located at 379 North Oates Street in
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000844 12-MAR-2019 07:51 AM