alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 15, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03069]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 22-39; RM-11917; DA 22-87; FR ID 71247]


Television Broadcasting Services; Billings, Montana; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register of February 4, 2022, concerning a petition for 
rulemaking filed by Scripps Broadcasting Holdings LLC, licensee of 
KTVQ(TV), channel 10, Billings, Montana, requesting the substitution of 
channel 20 for channel 10 in the Table of Allotments. The document 
contained the incorrect call sign of the licensee. The document also 
contained an incorrect licensee name.

DATES: February 15, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at 
(202) 418-1647 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#753f1a0c16105b3710071b0601101c1b351316165b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6fcd9cfd5d398f4d3c4d8c5c2d3dfd8f6d0d5d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2022-02337, in the Federal Register of February 4, 2022, 
appearing on page 6473, in the third column, correct the first sentence 
in the Summary caption to read:

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) has before 
it a petition for rulemaking filed by Scripps Broadcasting Holdings LLC 
(Petitioner), the licensee of KTVQ(TV), channel 10, Billings, Montana.

    Dated: February 7, 2022.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2022-03069 Filed 2-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Ashley BISHOP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

Ashley Bishop, Sanderson, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*862Appellant, Ashley Bishop, appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his rule 3.800(a) motion, Appellant alleged that the court erred in sentencing him upon a second violation of probation to twenty years as an habitual felony offender without re-designating him an HFO. The State properly concedes error in that the trial court's record attachments do not show whether there was a re-designation of Appellant's HFO status during Appellant's 2014 VOP resentencing and/or the current 2016 VOP resentencing. *See**State v. Akins* , 69 So.3d 261 (Fla. 2011) (holding that HFO designation must be restated at each resentencing to be applied); *Wighard v. State* , 71 So.3d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (applying *Akins* and holding that HFO designation was lost when it was not restated at VOP hearing). Absent an HFO designation, Appellant's twenty-year sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for a second-degree felony. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause for the trial court to either attach refuting records or resentence Appellant to a legal, non-HFO sentence.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Jacob HAWKINS, Appellant, v. Jimmy COKER, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4347

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 22, 2018

Jacob Hawkins, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brett Coleman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED . *See**Mobley v. McNeil* , 989 So.2d 1215 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). In light of the dismissal, Appellant's motion for leave to file an amended brief, filed on May 18, 2018, is denied.

Wolf, Lewis, and Ray, JJ., concur.
Sammie DUBBERLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3823

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 30, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 19, 2018

Sammie Dubberly, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

*1192AFFIRMED .

Ray, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Exhibit








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-182473, 333-207130, 333-227501 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 2-76378, 333-175185, 333-195314, 333-208999, 333-225417, 333-225992 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2019, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Torchmark Corporation and subsidiaries (“Torchmark”), and the effectiveness of Torchmark’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Torchmark for the year ended December 31, 2018.  




/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 28, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2011
    /s/ Randall GausmanRandall GausmanVice President and Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION





Exhibit
32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the
Quarter Ended April 5, 2009 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the
undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The Report containing the
      financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      and





2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operation of Pomeroy IT Solutions,
    Inc.





August
24, 2009




/s/
      Christopher C. FromanChristopher
      C. FromanChief
      Executive Officer and
President





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Odilia Graciela CHACON, also known as Grace Chacon, also known as Graciela Chacon, also known as Gracie Chacon, also known as Odilia Chacon, also known as Odilia G. Chacon, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-50089 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Odilia Graciela Chacon, Pro Se

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Odilia Graciela Chacon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cha-con has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1998
<CASH>                                          91,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,919
<INVENTORY>                                    220,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               322,103
<PP&E>                                         379,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 664,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,883
<BONDS>                                        182,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       265,030
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   664,330
<SALES>                                        250,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,239
<CGS>                                          179,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,012
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,861
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,599
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
KIDSTOYSPLUS.COM, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                           11,372
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19,389
<PP&E>                                            8,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   29,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            56,419
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                      9,968,084
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     29,712
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                274,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (270,449)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.03)



</TABLE>
Robert D. CRAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2111

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Damoorgian, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Kimberly BALTIMORE v. Jon Byron NELSON et al.

1150078

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

Reh. denied.
NEWPORT PROPERTIES, INC. Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Andrew ROBINSON, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3168

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
Denzel Andrew Anthony HIGDON, DOC #S40263, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-2403 2D17-2406 2D17-2410 2D17-2412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEPHANIE CORREA

, Appellant,

v.

PATRIC I A HONEY and EAST COAST BOBCAT SERVICES, INC. d/b/a

EAST COAST MAINT EN ANCE AND MANAGEMENT

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 22

- 35

[ December 15, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Carlos A. Rodriguez , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17

- 013038

.

Stephanie, Correa, Deerfield Beach, pro se.

Eric J. Israel and David B. Israel of Israel, Israel & Associates, P. A.,

Davie, for appellee East Coast Bobcat Services, Inc. d/b/a East Coast

Maintenance and Management

.

No appearance for appellee Patricia Honey.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST DATA CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(in millions)



|                                         |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ----- | --------------- | - | -----
|                                         |  | Three Months Ended March 31,
|                                         |  | 2006 (Restated)              |       | 2005 (Restated)
|Earnings:                                |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Income before income taxes(1)            |  | $                            | 610.2 |                 | $ | 673.2
|Interest expense                         |  |                              | 69.2  |                 |   | 48.1 
|Other adjustments                        |  |                              | 10.3  |                 |   | 10.5 
|                                         |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Total earnings (a)                       |  | $                            | 689.7 |                 | $ | 731.8
|                                         |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Fixed charges:                           |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Interest expense                         |  | $                            | 69.2  |                 | $ | 48.1 
|Other adjustments                        |  |                              | 10.3  |                 |   | 10.5 
|                                         |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Total fixed charges (b)                  |  | $                            | 79.5  |                 | $ | 58.6 
|                                         |  |                              |       |                 |   |      
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b) |  |                              | 8.68  |                 |   | 12.49



|(1) | Income before income taxes includes minority interest and equity earnings in affiliates, and
excludes discontinued operations and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. Reflecting such amounts on a cash basis would not materially impact the ratio due to the frequency of cash distributions.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges consist of interest on debt, amortization of deferred financing costs and
a portion of rentals determined to be representative of interest. Earnings consist of income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.31








A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON -  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2019)






	
		
	Retainers  (1)
	USD

	 
	 

	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):
	30,000

	 
	 

	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	120,000

	 
	 

	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:  
(except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	15,000

	 
	 

	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:   
	25,000

	 
	 

	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	20,000

	 
	 

	Additional Annual Retainer for Board Members serving on three committees:
	6,000

	 
	 

	Additional Compensation
	 

	 
	 

	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	150,000




    


In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred in the attendance of the meeting.












                  
    










Page 1 of 2







A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON - EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2019)










Notes:


		
	1)
	Payments of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:








		
	I)
	Annual Retainers are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).


		
	II)
	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.


		
	III)
	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).


		
	IV)
	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons) will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarter’s retainer amounts (up or down).


		
	V)
	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.  






2) Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock grant equivalent to USD 150,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual Shareholders’ meeting.


































Page 2 of 2
Judith HUSKINS O/B/O Ian HUSKINS, Appellant, v. Jane Alice SAUER O/B/O Alice Elizabeth GLENNON, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1475

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 9, 2018

Christopher E. Cosden, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Michael Mummert, Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment for protection against stalking. We write only to clarify that, as the trial court correctly orally ruled, Judith Huskins is not a party to the injunction and is not enjoined in any way.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Robert M. E. BRUIST, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3008

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 15, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Petitioner's petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certificate Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Christopher W. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Christopher W. Wolf