alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE: Dianne J. MARSHALL

NO. 2018-B-0918

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledges that she negligently violated the following provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct: Rules 1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client), 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client), 1.16(d) (obligations upon termination of the representation), and 8.4(a) (violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct). Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Dianne J. Marshall, Louisiana Bar Roll number 8441, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
Tommie L. ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2199

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Tommy Tyrell JORDAN v. STATE

CR-16-0231

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

Reh. denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1531 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1531

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2021

 Mr. Wittman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title V of the Social Security Act to require assurances that 
  certain family planning service projects and programs will provide 
   pamphlets containing the contact information of adoption centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Information Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION IN FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES OF PAMPHLETS CONTAINING 
              ADOPTION CENTER CONTACT INFORMATION.

    Title V of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 514. LIMITATION.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, a grant may be made or contract entered into under section 501 
for a family planning service project or program only upon assurances 
satisfactory to the Secretary that the project or program will--
            ``(1) provide to each person to whom the medical 
        professional provides family planning medical services, at the 
        time the person inquires about medical or abortion services, a 
        pamphlet that contains--
                    ``(A) a comprehensive list of the adoption centers 
                located in the region (as determined by the Secretary) 
                where the adoption services are provided; and
                    ``(B) the address and telephone number of each such 
                center; and
            ``(2) provide each such person an opportunity to read the 
        pamphlet.
    ``(b) Pamphlets.--The Secretary shall prepare, annually update, and 
distribute to each project or program referred to in subsection (a) 
pamphlets described in such subsection.
    ``(c) No Additional Funds.--No funds may be used to carry out this 
section, except funds that are appropriated to carry out this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 60 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report 

to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to complete a background check within 3 business 

days, and the procedures followed after it is discovered that a firearm 

transfer has been made to a transferee who is ineligible to receive 

a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Ms. JACKSON LEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to report to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers resulting from the failure to 

complete a background check within 3 business days, 

and the procedures followed after it is discovered that 

a firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who 

is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 60 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accidental Firearms 

3 Transfers Reporting Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FBI REPORT ON FIREARMS TRANSFERS RESULTING 

5 FROM THE FAILURE TO COMPLETE A BACK6 GROUND CHECK WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS, 

7 AND THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED AFTER IT 

8 IS DISCOVERED THAT A FIREARM TRANSFER 

9 HAS BEEN MADE TO A TRANSFEREE WHO IS 

10 INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A FIREARM. 

11 Within 120 days after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act and every 6 months thereafter, the Director of 

13 the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the 

14 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representa15 tives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate 

16 a written report on— 

17 (1) the number of proposed firearm transfers— 

18 (A) about which a person licensed under 

19 chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, con20 tacted the national instant criminal background 

21 check system established under section 103 of 

22 the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act; 

23 (B) with respect to which the system failed 

24 to respond to the licensee within 3 business 

25 days; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 60 IH

1 (C) which were completed in the period 

2 covered by the report; and 

3 (2) the procedures followed after it is discovered 

4 that a firearm transfer has been made to a trans5 feree who is ineligible to receive a firearm. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Valene Jaqualin WELLS v. Jeremy Phillip WHEELER

2160050

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
William Charles RICHARDSON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2051

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 30, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

EMAS, LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
#### Commonwealth, ex rel. Houser, Appellant, *v.*Seip.

*546Submitted May 21,1956.

Before Stern, O. J., Jones, Bell, Chidsey, Musmanno and Arnold, JJ.

*547
      *Etter W. Houser,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Martin H.*Loch, Assistant District Attorney and *Huette F. Dowling,*District Attorney, for appellee.

June 25, 1956:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The Order of the Court below is affirmed on the Opinion of J udge Neely.
##### 



Exhibit 32(b) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of RARE Hospitality International,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, W. Douglas Benn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ W. Douglas Benn 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to RARE Hospitality
International, Inc. and will be retained by RARE Hospitality International,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Pacific Continental Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Hal M. Brown, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael A. Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Hal M. Brown
/s/ Michael A. ReynoldsHal M. Brown
Michael A. ReynoldsChief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer





Dated:  March 28, 2011
USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Ronald W. DRUCKER, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2297

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
S.R.H. v. STATE

CR-16-0387

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

May 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Omahr GREGORY v. STATE

CR-16-0223

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 27, 2017

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

1

IN THE MATTER OF: 1

i CASE No.

THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE 1

WARRANTS, APPLICATIONS, PEN j CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REGISTERS, AND NON- \ ELIZABETH A. PRESTON-DEAVERS

DISCLOSURE ORDERS IN THE |

CASES LISTED IN ATTACHMENT |

A

FILED UNDER SEAL

ORDER TO UNSEAL

Upon the Motion ofthe United States Attorney and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the Search and Seizure Warrants, Applications, Pen Registers, and NonDisclosure Orders and related documents in the cases listed in Attachment A in the above-entitled

matter, be unsealed.

Case: 2:18-mj-00515-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 49
ATTACHMENT A:

2:17-l\/lJ-434 2:18-MJ-007 2:18-MJ-756 2:19-MJ-001 2:19-MJ-471

2:17-MJ-585 2;18-MJ-8 2:18-MJ-840 2;19-MJ-45 2:19-MJ-481

2;17-MJ-586 2:18-MJ-9 2:19-MJ-121 2:19-MJ-498

2:17-MJ-587 2:18-MJ-10 2:19-MJ-122 2:19-MJ-510

2:17-MJ-588 2:18-MJ-17 2:19-MJ-127 2:19-MJ-512

2:17-MJ-589 2;18-MJ-51 2:19-MJ-153 2:19-MJ-527

2:17-MJ-617 2:18-MJ-61 2:19-MJ-174 2:19-MJ-528

2:17-MJ-644 2:18-MJ-92 2:19-MJ-175 2:19-MJ-553

2:17-MJ-676 2:lS-MJ-205 2:19-MJ -191 2:19-MJ-560

2:17-MJ-677 2:18-MJ-213 2:19-MJ-255 2;19-MJ-561

2:17-MJ-678 2:18-MJ-232 2:19-MJ-265 2:19-MJ-562

2:17-MJ-679 2:18-MJ-326 2:19-MJ-266 2;19-MJ-563

2:17-MJ-696 2;18-MJ-355 2:19-MJ-272 2:19-MJ-564

2:17-MJ-713 2:18-MJ-379 2:19-MJ-273 2:19-MJ-570

2;17-MJ-714 2:18-MJ-397 2:19-MJ-276

2;17-MJ-715 2:18-MJ-398 2:19-MJ-290

2;17-MJ-747 2:18-MJ-404 2:19-MJ-291

2;17-MJ-758 2:18-MJ-411 2:19-MJ-320

2;17-MJ-759 2:18-MJ-429 2:19-MJ-348

2:17-MJ-761 2:18-MJ-434 2:19-MJ-349

2:17-MJ-762 2:18-MJ-460 2:19-MJ-379

2:17-MJ-782 2:18-MJ-498 2:19-MJ-414

2:17-MJ-791 2:18-MJ-512

2:18-MJ-515

2:18-MJ-532

2:19-MJ-460

Case: 2:18-mj-00515-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/29/20 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 50
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 26, 2014

No. 04-13-00497-CV

CNMK TEXAS PROPERTIES LLC d/b/a Cinemark Movies 12,

Appellant

v.

Sandra RODRIGUEZ and Ruperto R. Rodriguez,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CVT00752 D4

Honorable Oscar J Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

This appeal is currently set for oral arguments on April 30, 2014. On March 25, 2014, 

appellant’s counsel informed this court that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. 

Counsel states a joint motion to dismiss will be filed as soon as the parties’ settlement agreement 

is finalized, and asks this court, in the meantime, to remove this appeal from the court’s April 30, 

2014, oral argument docket.

The appeal will be removed from the court’s April 30, 2014, oral argument docket after 

the parties file the appropriate motion to dismiss. The parties are encouraged to file a motion to 

dismiss that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 by April 23, 2014.

It is so ORDERED on this 26th day of March, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:_______________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Joshua Nelson CURRY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0695

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
KPMG  LLP
Chartered  Accountants
Box  10426  777  Dunsmuir  Street
Vancouver,  BC  V7Y  1K3
Canada

CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS

The  Board  of  Directors
Genesis  Bioventures,  Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (no.
333-100606,  333-100267  and 333-81130) on Form S-B of Genesis Bioventures, Inc.
of  our  report  dated  April  4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets  of  Genesis  Bioventures,  Inc  as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the
related  consolidated  statements  of  operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows  for  the  years  ended  December 31, 2002 and 2001 and cumulative for the
period  from  September  19, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 2002, which report
appears  in  the  December  31,  2002  annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Genesis
Bioventures,  Inc.

Our  report  dated  April  4, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash
flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as  a  going  concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of  this  uncertainty.

/s/  Chartered  Accountants
--------------------------------
KPMG  LLP
Vancouver,  Canada
April  17,  2003
EX-10(XVI)








EXHIBIT 10(xvi)




Summary of Bonus Plan



Camco Financial Corporation (“Camco”) maintains both a short-term cash bonus plan and a long-term
stock-based incentive plan. Bonus and incentive plan awards for executive officers of Camco and its
subsidiaries are based on the achievement of corporate performance objectives which are established
annually by Camco’s Compensation Committee at the beginning of each year. Currently, the
performance objectives consist of minimum thresholds that must be met under the following
performance measures before cash or equity incentives will be paid to the Named Executive Officers,
regardless of the results of the other performance measurements: nonperforming loans as percent of
assets, liquidity, deposit growth, earnings per share, business loan growth and relationship
building (products and services per customer). The individual objectives are then weighted as to
value each year, with the most important goals having heavier weightings as decided by management
and the Board of Directors.



Currently,
the cash bonus amounts range from 0% to 150% of the Chief Executive Officer’s base
salary and 15% to 20% of other executive officers’ base salaries, subject to the percentage of
performance measurements achieved. Additional discretionary bonus amounts may also be awarded under
the cash bonus plan in recognition of other achievements, such as merger and acquisition
activities, which are not part of the established performance objectives.



The long-term incentive plan provides for the award of stock options of varying levels for each of
the executive officers, ranging in amount from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the officer’s base
salary, subject to the percentage of performance measurements achieved. Options are issued at
market prices, have a term of ten years, and typically vest at a rate of 20% each year beginning on
the grant date. This element of the executive compensation program is designed to align the
interests of the executive with corporate stockholder objectives since the price performance of
Camco’s common stock directly affects the value of these long-term awards.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. Allison, Chief Financial Officer of Compuprint, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Compuprint, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on our evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  April 14, 2005

                                              /s/ David R. Allison
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Principal Financial Officer
A00A1271.

#### THE STATE v. GOODWIN.

(538 SE2d 159)

Decided August 9, 2000

*J. Gray Conger, District Attorney, Melvin E. Hyde, Jr., Assistant District Attorney,*for appellant.

*Frank K. Martin, John T. Martin,*for appellee.

Ellington, Judge.

The trial court granted Glenda Goodwin’s special plea in bar to arson charges, and the State appeals. The State concedes “there is no question that the statute [of limitation] had in fact ran [sic] at the time of indictment.” However, the State argues that the statute was tolled pursuant to OCGA § 17-3-2 (1) because Goodwin left Georgia for a period of years and was not amenable to prosecution.

We have reviewed the entire record and find that the trial court’s decision to grant the plea in bar was not clearly erroneous. The evidence adduced by the State failed to show that Goodwin absconded from Georgia or otherwise concealed herself so that she could not be arrested. See *Danuel v. State,*262 Ga. 349, 351-353 (2)-(4) (418 SE2d 45) (1992), interpreting OCGA § 17-3-2 (1). Because the trial court’s “Order on Defendant’s Plea in Bar” thoroughly sets forth the relevant facts and applicable law, we adopt it as our opinion in this case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Walker
Interactive Systems, Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,304
<SECURITIES>                                     9,931
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,102
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,902
<PP&E>                                          26,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,462
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,520
<SALES>                                         49,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,102
<CGS>                                           22,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,344
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<FN>
<F1>   Basic earnings per share are reported under Edgar tag "EPS-Primary"
</FN>
        



</TABLE>