alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Order filed March 12, 2013 Withdrawn; Order filed March

28, 2013

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00173

- CV

____________ JOSEPH ANTHONY THOMA S , Appellant

V.

LAKE COVE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 69824



### ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 13, 2012. A motion for new trial was timely filed December 13, 2012. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due February 11, 2013, but was not filed until February 26, 2013, a date within 15 days of the notice of appeal. In the same document as his notice of appeal appellant filed a motion to extend time to file notice of appeal.On March 12, 2013, this court is sued an order requiring appellant to file a

motion in a separate document. That order is withdrawn.
Appellant’s motion to extend time to file notice of appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 26.3 The reporter’s record is due April 4, 2013.

PER C URIAM
#### TELOS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, NETCENTRICS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees

2016-1655

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 13, 2016

Nathanael Hartland, Miles & Stock-bridge, P.C., Baltimore, MD, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Joseph Gilbert Billings, Katherine Bauer Burrows.

Corinne Anne Niosi, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Douglas K. Mickle.

Jeremy William Dutra, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Netcentrics Corpo-raton. Also represented by Karen Har-baugh, Vienna, VA.

(Taranto, Linn, and Chen, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.42





NEW JOB SUMMARY
FOR
LANCE BERRY


		
	DATE:
	December 7, 2018




		
	POSITION:
	Executive Vice President, Chief Operations & Chief Financial Officer


    
		
	REPORTING TO:
	Bob Palmisano    




		
	SALARY:
	$515,000 annual salary, less withholdings for Federal, FICA, and State taxes




		
	PAY FREQUENCY: 
	Bi-Weekly




EMPLOYEE
		
	INCENTIVE PLAN:
	You are eligible to participate in the Employee Incentive Plan with a target payout of 75% of your eligible earnings.  The actual payout for this period will be dependent upon business performance as well as your individual performance.




		
	EQUITY:
	Subject to Board of Directors approval and the terms of the Company’s equity      incentive plan, you will be eligible for an equity grant under our long-term incentive grant guidelines.  The target grant for your role is 275% of base salary, but your actual equity grant may be above or below your target depending on, among other factors, final recommendation and approval by the Board and shares available under our equity incentive plan.




RELATIONSHIP TO 
OTHER 
		
	AGREEMENTS:
	Except for the terms of your new position, as described above, this letter agreement does not constitute a contract of employment for a specific term, you remain an employee at will, and this letter agreement does not change or modify any other existing agreements between you and the Company or any subsidiary, which agreements will remain in full force and effect in accordance with their existing terms.




		
	EFFECTIVE DATE:
	January 1, 2019    




Congratulations on your new opportunity as EVP, Chief Operations and Chief Financial Officer. I believe this role offers a unique opportunity for you to help us build a successful enterprise with a Team that is committed to our Customers, Employees, and Shareholders. I have no doubt Wright will continue to be a vehicle for growth, excitement, and success and that your contributions will be instrumental in achieving that.





















Kindest Regards, 




/s/ Robert J. Palmisono
Robert J. Palmisano
President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Lance Berry, accept this offer of employment and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in this letter. 




/s/ Lance Berry                                December 7, 2018
Executive Signature                                Date
Vinodh RAGHUBIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3644

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. George David REBANT, Defendant-Appellant

No. 15-40773 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 11/23/2016

Terri-Lei O’Malley, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

George David Rebant, Pro Se

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

George David Rebant, federal prisoner # 93999-279, seeks leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He challenges the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his IFP motion in the district court. His IFP motion was filed in connection with his appeal of the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion seeking a sentence reduction. This court previously dismissed Rebant’s appeal from the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. *United States v. Rebant,*No. 15-40773 (5th Cir. Nov. 19, 2015) (order dismissing appeal as untimely).

Rebant does not address the district court’s reasons for denying his IFP motion. When an appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if the appellant had not appealed that issue. *Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy Sheriff Abner,*813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987); *see also*Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8). Thus, Rebant’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Carlton Paul BACON, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2054

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 20, 2017

Following review of appellant's response to this Court's order to show cause, it is ordered that the above styled appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LUCK, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Samer Salameh, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of rStar
Corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon
a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ Samer Salameh
----------------------------------------
Name: Samer Salameh
Date: April 15, 2003


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

                                       3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 15, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                 DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                    DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                      JUN-15-1999
<CASH>                                                               64,152
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                                          13,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     83,271
<PP&E>                                                              474,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      591,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                36,296
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                358
<OTHER-SE>                                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        391,705
<SALES>                                                             274,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    274,691
<CGS>                                                                98,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       234,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     16,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      23,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          9,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         14,865
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0.40


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kimberly S. Patmore, the Chief
Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Kimberly S. Patmore
|                         |  |  |  | Kimberly S. Patmore    
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | July 30, 2010 |                                                         By: | /s/ Clifton R. Beckham                |   |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | Clifton R. Beckham                    |   |
|   |               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
#### Emmanuel SLOAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PETTIWAY, Lt.; McNeil, Lt.; Hargrove, Lt.; Crock, Sgt.; Marsh, Sgt.; Whitaker, Sgt.; Luaford, Corporal; Trent, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6884

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: October 20, 2017

Emmanuel Sloan, Appellant Pro Se.

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit' Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Sloan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. The district court dismissed the action upon finding that Sloan failed to provide the court with a current mailing address. We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with a court , order. *See Ballard v. Carlson,*882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir. 1989). Our review of the record reveals that Sloan informed the district court of his new mailing address in a letter the district court received on May 30, 2017, more than three weeks before the district court dismissed the action. Because the record does not support the district court’s rationale for dismissal, we conclude that the dismissal constituted an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, we vacate the dismissal order and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED*
#### Robert DINKINS Plaintiff-Appellant v. State of MISSOURI; Missouri Department of Corrections Defendants-Appellees Correctional Medical Services; John Does, Medical Doctors; Phillip Lange; Morgan Logan Defendants

No. 16-2583

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 2017

Filed: March 30, 2017

Robert Dinkins, Pro Se

Nicholas S. Beydler, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, Cara Stuckel, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendants-Appellees

Andrew F. Babitz, Peter J. Dunne, Pit-zer & Snodgrass, Saint Louis, MO, Jessica L. Liss, Jackson & Lewis, Saint Louis, MO, for Defendant Correctional Medical Services

Julianne O’Bannon Germinder, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendants Phillip Lange, Morgan Logan

Before GRUENDER, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Robert Dinkins appeals the district court’s1 entry of judgment in favor of defendants following an adverse jury verdict in his civil action. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms, and rejects Dinkins’s claims as meritless.

The judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Matt Jeffrey Whitworth, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 636(c).
Francois BOVELL, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2601

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 05, 2017

Following review of the emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

SUAREZ, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ., concur.
W.W., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2441

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### WON YONG KIM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas Patrick GORMAN; Nationstar Bank, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-1021

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (l:16-cv-01187-AJT-TCB)

Won Yong Kim, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Gorman, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding' precedfent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Won Yong Kim seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing her claims against Thomas Gorman in Kim’s civil action against Gorman and Nationstar Bank. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus, Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Because Kim’s claims against Nationstar Bank have not been addressed, the order Kim seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | August 9, 2010 |                                                         By: | /s/ Clifton R. Beckham                |   |
|--------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | Clifton R. Beckham                    |   |
|   |           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
FAA -lOIO -OE%

March 18, 2010

Mr. Clint Jones or Mr. Phil Ford

Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Aircraft Directorate, ANM-1 00

1601 Lind Avenue, SW

Renton, WA 98057-3356

SA530NE Configurations 1 & 3

PETITIONFOR EXEMPTION

The Leading Edge Group, LLC (LEG), as FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder of

SA530NE requests FAR compliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (PIE) to FAA

rule making established under 14 CFR Sect. 26.47(c) & (e)(2).

lEG petitions for US Govt. engineering relief on tank Configurations 1 and 3 of SA530NE for

8727-100 series aircraft, with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuel System (AFS) in VIP passenger cabin

(LOPA) deck plans. This group includes a Head of State (HOS) aircraft for the Govt. of Gambia_

Boeing 8727-100 SNs 18323, 18752, 18933 & 19252:

1. These SNs contain a VIP stateroom and are configured for HOS service.

2, These SNs operate exclusively in private or Head of State (HOS) service.

3. These SNs are listed on foreign Registries.

4. These SNs will require extensive engineering changes for a deck plan (LOPA) to be

suitable for EASA or US commercial revenue service under FAR 121 (125 or 135).

5. Responsive engineering resources of the FAA can be conserved and financial relief

can be realized on behalf of the DAH and US Govt; upon timely approval of this PIE.

6. The Operators nor STC holder are able to determine if modifications to the AFS

loadjng points on this airframe have been altered, AFS brackets removed or, if the AFS

attach points have been adapted for other purposes; requiring in themselves new lCAs.

7. Operator disclosure and DAH-onboard AFS survey of the aircraft is required to submit

useful engineering for FAA that is relevant to SN existing condition.

8. It is the position of the STC holder that air safety will not be adversely impacted given

these SNs have limited private use and, each at over 30+years of airframe age, will likely

never return to commercial FAA/EASA air carrier service.

In the event any of these SNs are transferred to a third party and an interior reconfiguration

(LOPA) is completed, a current airframe survey to include #6 changes can be reviewed and

specific airframe load and inspection analysis (OTE I D11) due FAA under the Aging Aircraft

Safety Rule for the AFS (and the attach points) can be completed in accordance with FAR

26.47(c) and (e)(2).

Sincerely, /\

THlJIoIN7GE GROUP. LLC

Capt~C.··~Manag;ngO;rector

A"sp~ng.

ASE tot} ji~-1 Proprietary(j)1 N

Fl. &/ N

>1-1-520 Nit" Notary Y;fJ

Mair; ofllc~342.'1 G,/"/I/or; Point Kitk'~If7{/, /Nqshinytof} 9803-i Mqin (425) 576-4030