alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michael SPEAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1714

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 1, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brittany N. O'Neil, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's failure to appear for a scheduled sentencing hearing resulted in the imposition of a substantial prison sentence pursuant to *Quarterman v. State* , 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1988). The trial court also adjudicated Appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt for his failure to appear. We reverse the sentences imposed in case numbers 2016-CF-039801 and 2016-CF-047845, and remand for an evidentiary hearing and factual determination as to whether Appellant's failure to comply with the *Quarterman* agreement was willful. We also reverse the conviction and sentence for indirect criminal contempt because the trial court did not afford procedural due process. *See**Garrett v. State* , 876 So.2d 24, 25 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (merely asking defendant if he wished to explain behavior was insufficient; rather, court must inform defendant that he can present mitigating circumstances and give "a separate and distinct opportunity" for him to do so).

On remand, Appellant shall be afforded a new sentencing hearing and a new hearing on the contempt charge.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORPY, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
#### Robert G. MODRALL, Appellant v. Kimberly DEUTSCH and Holly Early, Appellees

No. 16-5230

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: February 28, 2017

Rehearing En Banc Denied May 4, 2017

Robert G. Modrall, Pro Se

R. Craig Lawrence, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees

BEFORE: Rogers and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed August 2, 2016, dismissing the complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in so ruling. See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Rule 8 requires “a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction” and “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), (2). The underlying complaint failed to satisfy that minimal standard.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
William A. BISHOP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3390

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 24, 2018

William A. Bishop, Raiford, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Protide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 14, 2004, hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                         |                                                          |                               |  |                        | 
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | 
|                         |                                                          | PROTIDE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|Date:   January 13, 2004 |                                                          | By:                           |  | /s/   Milo R. Polovina | 
|                         |                                                         
|                         | Milo R. Polovina, Chairman of the Board, President & CEO |                              

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Protide Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 14, 2004, hereof (the Report), the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)    
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                          |                                     |                               |  |                     | 
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ----------------------------- |  | ------------------- | 
|                          |                                     | PROTIDE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|Dated:   January 13, 2004 |                                     | By:                           |  | /s/   David E. Tess | 
|                          |                                    
|                          | David E. TessVice President Finance |                              

17
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kimberly S. Patmore, the
Chief Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kimberly S. Patmore
|                        |  |  |  | Kimberly S. Patmore    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Brian WILLIAMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. MCKENZIE CAPITAL LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1755

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 22, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Lorna Nagler,President and Chief Executive Officer of Christopher & Banks Corporation(the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.  The quarterly report of the Company on Form10-Q for the period ended September 1, 2007 as filed with the United StatesSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: October 11, 2007 |   |                                                |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                |
|                   | By:    | /s/ Lorna Nagler                                    |   |
|                   |   | Lorna Nagler*President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) staff members selected to serve on the Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level (SL) Performance Review Board (PRB). This notice supersedes all previous PRB membership notices.

# DATES:

The staff members in this notice will begin serving as PRB members on February 11, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cassie Ender, Human Capital Specialist, Office of Human Capital and Services, at (202) 395-7360 or                         *Cassie.L.Galla@ustr.eop.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

                    USTR is required (                    *see*5 U.S.C. 4314(c)) to establish a PRB to review and make recommendations to the U.S. Trade Representative for final approval of the performance rating, performance-based pay adjustment, and performance award for each incumbent SES and SL. The following staff members have been selected to serve on USTR's PRB:                

*Chair:*                     Bill Jackson, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Textile Affairs                

*Member:*                     Dawn Shackleford, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific                

*Member:*                     Dan Mullaney, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Europe and the Middle East                

*Member:*                     Julie Callahan, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Agricultural Affairs                

*Member:*                     Juan Millan, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Monitoring and Investment                

Fred Ames,

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Administration, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2022-02999 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3390-F2-P
lxu-ex1018_318.htm



Exhibit 10.18

 

NOTICE PERIOD EXTENSION

Daniel D. Greenwell (“Executive”) and LSB Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), entered into an employment agreement effective as of December 31, 2015 (“Employment Agreement”), the initial term of which is scheduled to expire on December 30, 2018.

The term of the Employment Agreement automatically would be extended for another year through December 30, 2019 unless either party elects not to extend the Employment Agreement by giving written notice to the other party by July 4, 2018.

Since Executive and the Company are discussing potential changes to the Employment Agreement and such discussions may impact their decision whether to provide notice of an election not to extend the Employment Agreement, both Executive and the Company previously agreed to an extension until December 7, 2018 to provide notice and now agree that Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby further amended such that the deadline for providing notice to the other party of an election not to extend the Employment Agreement for another year commencing December 31, 2018 shall be December 30, 2018.

In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall continue in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this Notice Period Extension or have caused this Notice Period Extension to be duly executed and delivered on their behalf.     

 


	
EXECUTIVE

	
 

	
/s/ Daniel D. Greenwell

	
Daniel D. Greenwell

	
 

	
 

	
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.

	
 

	
/s/ Michael J. Foster

	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Michael J. Foster

	
Its:
	
Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FILED AS
PART OF THE APACHE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,068
<SECURITIES>                                     2,194
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (513)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,793
<PP&E>                                           3,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,450
<BONDS>                                             93
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,493
<SALES>                                          5,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,749
<CGS>                                            1,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,897
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### Melvin BROWN, Appellant v. Sandra HILL, et al., Appellees

No. 16-7059

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: February 16, 2017

*7Melvin Brown, Pro Se

Carol S. Blumenthal, Attorney, Blumen-thal & Cordone, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees Sandra Hill, Suzanne Bond, Belinda Sealey, Lawrence Parot, Richard Gerlach, Susan Bond, John Adams

Stacy Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Loren L. AliKhan, Deputy Solicitor General, Todd Sunhwae Kim, Solicitor General, Jason Harold Lederstein, Office of the Attorney General, District of Columbia, Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee David Walker

Jeffrey Brian Hardie, Hunton & Williams LLP, McLean, VA, for Defendant-Appellee Green Door Corporation

BEFORE: Henderson, Brown, and Pillard, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and appendices filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the case be remanded for the district court to determine whether appellant should have been allowed to file the second amended complaint that is attached to his brief and, if so, for further proceedings concerning the complaint. The second amended complaint was stamped “received” by the clerk of the district and bankruptcy courts on November 24, 2015, but, for reasons unclear, it does not appear on the district court’s docket.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!--/* //NOSONAR */--><html  lang="en-US">
<head id="Head"><meta id="MetaDescription" name="DESCRIPTION" /><meta id="MetaKeywords" name="KEYWORDS" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" /><title>
	U.S. Navy Identifies Sailor Lost Overboard in the Red Sea
</title><link id="css3605" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/module.css" /><link id="css4818" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/desktopmodules/ArticleCS/styles/Navy2/style.css" /></head>
<body>
    <main>
    <div>
    <div class="adetail print" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/NewsArticle">
    <img alt="U.S. Navy Logo" class="print-logo" src="/Portals/_default/Skins/NavyTheme2/Resources/img/OfficialNavyLogoInverted.svg">
    <div class="container">
        <div class="body-section">
            <h1>U.S. Navy Identifies Sailor Lost Overboard in the Red Sea</h1>
            <div class="press-briefing__date">23 March 2024</div>
            
            <div class="body-text">
                
                <p>Aviation Machinist’s Mate 2nd Class Oriola Michael Aregbesola, assigned to the “Swamp Foxes” of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 74, was deployed with a detachment aboard Mason, which has been operating in the U.S. 5th Fleet since November.</p>

<p>Aregbesola, of Florida, joined the Navy in July 2020. He reported to HSM-74 in December 2020.<br aria-hidden="true" />
<br aria-hidden="true" />
“Petty Officer Aregbesola fully embodied the selfless character and thoughtful warrior spirit of the United States Navy Sailor,” said Cmdr. Eric Kohut, HSM-74 commanding officer. “His outstanding performance prior to and during deployment went well beyond aircraft maintenance; he truly saw and valued every member of the ship/air team. He will continue on in the heart of every Swamp Fox and our brothers and sisters in the IKE Carrier Strike Group. Our deepest thoughts and prayers are with his family.” <br aria-hidden="true" />
 </p>

<p>Mason and HSM-74 are part of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group and currently deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations.</p>

            </div>

        </div>
    </div>
</div>
<script>
    window.print();
</script>
    </div>
    </main>
</body>
</html>
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.





Date: May 28, 2010





/s/ Jane MorlokJane Morlok, Chief Financial Officer







E-4
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION





Exhibit
32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended April 5, 2009 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the
undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy IT
      Solutions, Inc.








May 18,
2009


/s/ Craig J. PropstCraig
      J. PropstSenior
      Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
June 7, 2012 

Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE, W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Abilene Regional Airport 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

The City of Abilene needs to improve its air service at Abilene Regional Airport. 

ABI is an under served airport and it is my understanding that funding is available 

to subsidize new service. Just yesterday, American Airlines, which is the only carrier 

at ABI announced that it is eliminating more flights. 

AA is already unreliable and not the least interested in providing good customer service. 

Perhaps competition might be helpful to the citizens of the Big Country in many ways. My 

husband travels regularly by air for his work. 

I request and would appreciate favorable action for ABI's grant application. 

Very truly yours, 

102B CR 146 

Ovalo, TX 79541 

·.: 

' ~ , ... ; ~ :. . .. .. -• .! • '. ~ 

~ > '. :· •• ' • • • { ~ •• ~ • 

-,: ! -:· 

-, ~"-.:• : -~ - -

. ~ ~ ' ..
Alexis CASTILLO-DIAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1110

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.