alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. DiNella, the Chief Financial Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: August 1, 2008   
|                       
|/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA  
|Ronald M. DiNella      
|Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      23.2**











**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the use in the Registration Statement of Tasker Capital Corp. on
      Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 of our report, dated March 24, 2004, relating
      to the consolidated balance sheet of Tasker Capital Corp. (a development stage
      company) as at December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements
      of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and
      for the period from inception, May 13, 1996, to December 31, 2003.




We
      also
      consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration
      Statement.






Vancouver,
                CanadaMarch
                30, 2006
            /s/    Morgan
                & Company
              Chartered
                Accountants
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond STERN, a/k/a Cuz, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6010

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 9, 2017

Decided: June 1, 2017

Raymond Stern, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Stern appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We review a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion, and a district court’s ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo. *United States v. Mann,*709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Here, the district court correctly concluded that Stern was not eligible for a sentence reduction. Because Stern was sentenced pursuant to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) agreement that specified the offense level but not the criminal history category or the advisory Guidelines range, and did not link the sentence to any particular Guidelines range, his sentence was based on the plea agreement and not a Guidelines range. *See United States v. May,*855 F.3d 271 (4th Cir. 2017). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EX PARTE Fred Donnell HOGAN

CR-16-0662

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Yak Communications Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles
Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: September 20, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles Zwebner                  
|                         |  |     |  | Charles Zwebner                      
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
Russell MCMILLAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3744

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 9, 2018

Russell McMillan, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1212

JEROME WANT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SHINDLE PROPERTIES, LLC; MICHELLE MILLER

- THORPE, Prop Manager , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 02833

- PWG )

Submitted : July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jerome Want, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Steven Tidball, GODWINTIROCCHI, LLC , Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Jerome Want appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint with prejudice . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Want v. Shindle Prop s ., LLC , No.
1:18

- cv
- 02833

- PWG (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argum ent would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
ACCEPTED 03-15-00439-CR 6753529 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/1/2015 5:08:32 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK CASE: 03-15-00439-CR JOHN GABRIEL ESQUIVEL Appellant
vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee THIRD COURT
OF APPEALS
STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL OF RECORD TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES, JOHN GABRIEL ESQUIVEL, Appellant in the above styled cause, and would show the Court as follows, the Appellant wishes to withdraw and substitute counsel. Gregory Sherwood currently represents Appellant as Attorney of Record. Appellant wishes to substitute the following counsel, Amber Vazquez Bode. Undersigned counsel has contacted Gregory Sherwood and he has no objection to this motion, as evidenced by his signature below. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that the Court allow the Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel ofRecord, and Amber Vazquez Bode be the attorney ofrecord, as set forth herein.Dated: August 24, 2015

AmberVazquezBode Vazquez Law Fnnr -- 1004 West Ave. Austin, Texas 78701 512-220-8507 office 512-480-0760 facsimile Texas BarNumber 24039225

# Agreed:**~~** Z

Gegcr)Tiherwood

P.O. Box 200613 Austin, Texas 78720 Phone: 512-484-9029 

## f3t;tr ?- 

# I

# g2**~'-(~**6DCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have served a copy ofthe forgoing Motionto Withdraw and Substitute Counsel ofRecord via Certified Mail and First Class Mail, on this 1st day ofSeptember 2015, as follows: Rosemary Lehmberg-Certified Mail-7014 1200 0000 9544 6223 Travis County District Attorney P.O. Box 1748 Austin Texas 78767 512-854-9400 Lisa C. McMinn-Certified Mail-7014 1200 0000 9544 6230 State Prosecuting Attorney PO Box 13046 Austin, TX 78711-3046 (512) 463-166 Angela Chambers-Certified Mail-7014 1200 0000 9544 6247 299th District Court Reporter 509 W 11th Street, 8th Floor Austin Texas 78701 512-854-9353 Gregory Sherwood-Certified Mail- 7013 1710 0002 3437 P.O. Box 200613 Austin Texas 78720 Phone: 512-484-9029 John Gabriel Esquivel-Certified Mail-70131710000234378906 Garza West Unit TDCJ: 02008263 4250 Highway 202 Beeville, Texas 78102 SID: 06050251

Is/Amber Vazquez Bode AMBERVAZQUEZ BODECASE: 03-15-00439-CR JOHN GABRIEL ESQUIVEL Appellant
vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee THIRD COURT
OF APPEALS
STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER ONMOTIONTO WITHDRAWAND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL OFRECORD
On this the
__ day of
_______ , 2015, came on to be heard Appellant's Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel ofRecord
. The Court having considered same, finds that the Motion should be: GRANTED 

### I DENIED.
Signedthis
__day of
____ , 2015.

JUDGE PRESIDING
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2008 |  | /s/ Robert L. Recchia  
|                      |  | Robert L. Recchia      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



36
George Andre KELLY, Appellant(s)/petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0260

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7768

ANTONIO COX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR AMONETTE; DAVE SMITH, Warden; RON ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-492-R) Submitted: April 13, 1999 Decided: April 23, 1999 Before ERVIN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Cox, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Cox’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Cox v. Amonette , No. CA-98-492-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**The undersigned, Chief Accounting Officer of W Holding Company, Inc. (the “Registrant”), herebycertifies that to his knowledge, on the date hereof: (a) the Form 10-K of the Registrant for the Period Ended December 31, 2006, filedon the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and  (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theRegistrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.       /s/ Norberto Rivera     Norberto Rivera, CPA    Vice President Corporate Comptroller
BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC; National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, P.A.; and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Judy Juanell HARLOW, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-273

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 28, 2018

Mark Hicks and Cindy L. Ebenfeld of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., of Miami and Hollywood, for Appellants.

Raymond N. Seaford of Law Office of Raymond N. Seaford, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Kimberly O'TOOLE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Francesco PICCIRILLO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2263

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ., concur.
Michael A. HARRIS, Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, substituted for Bank of America, NA, Lowes and Unknown Tenants/Owners, Appellees.

No. 4D17-2310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

Kevin L. Hagen of Hagen & Hagen, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Cynthia L. Comras, David Rosenberg and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit No. 32.1

Form 10-KSB
Echo Resources, Inc.
File No. 000-26703

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Echo Resources,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A3 for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Pieter  DuRand,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 24, 2008         By: /s/ Pieter DuRand
                                ------------------------------------------
                                  Pieter DuRand
                                Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer








---------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Echo Resources,  Inc. and will be retained by Echo  Resources,  Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W. Brantley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ LELAND W. BRANTLEY,
JR.Leland W. Brantley, Jr.Chief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2008
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIANA PESHKEPIA-CADENA; et al.,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

SUNTRUST BANK; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-55012

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-07322-RGK-RZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 24, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Liana Peshkepia-Cadena, Nina Lauren Munden, and Chris Cadena appeal

pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing their action alleging federal and

state law claims in connection with a foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under

FILED

MAR 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th

Cir. 2010), and for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with

local rules, Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). We affirm.

The district court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against SunTrust Bank and

U.S. Bank, N.A. because plaintiffs failed to file a timely opposition to their motion

to dismiss. See C.D. Cal. R. 7-12 (“The failure to file any required document, or

the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or

denial of the motion . . . .”). In their opening brief, plaintiffs fail to address how

the district court abused its discretion in dismissing their claims for failure to

comply with the local rules. Similarly, plaintiffs do not address why the district

court erred in dismissing their claims against the City of Downey for failure to

state a claim. Accordingly, plaintiffs have waived their appeal of the dismissal

orders. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“On appeal,

arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); see also

Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“We

review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening

brief.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

2 13-55012
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**ANDEXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Option Care, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission as of the date hereof (the “Report”),we, Rajat Rai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Paul Mastrapa,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, tothe best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopedpursuant to Secion 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Exchange Act Rule13a-14(b) that:

 

(1)                                  This Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Rajat Rai                                       |   |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Rajat Rai  Chief Executive Officer                  |   |
|               |   |                                                |   |
|               |   |                                                |   |
| Date: May 10, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Paul Mastrapa                                   |   |
|               |   | Paul Mastrapa                                       |   |
|               |   | Senior Vice President  and Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
#### AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, et al., Petitioners v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent Council of Industrial Boiler Owners, et al., Intervenors

No. 13-1258

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed: 12/20/2016

David M. Friedland, Beveridge <& Diamond, P.C., Leslie A. Hulse, American Chemistry Council, James Samuel Pew, Neil Gormley, Attorney, Earthjustice, Harry Moy Ng, John P. Wagner, Senior Attorney, American Petroleum Institute, Peter H. Wyckoff, Jeffrey A. Knight, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, William L. Wehrum, Jr., Hunton *&*Williams LLP, Quentin Riegel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Rachel Lee Brand, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Washington, DC, David Bookbinder, Law Office of David Bookbinder, Accokeek, MD, for Petitioners.

Norman Louis Rave, Jr., Perry M. Ro-sen, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Lisa Marie Jaeger, Bracewell LLP, Peter H. Wyckoff, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Neil Gormley, Attorney, James Samuel Pew, Earthjustice, William L. Wehrum, Jr., Scott Jordan Stone, Hun-ton *&*Williams LLP, Rachel Lee Brand, Sheldon Gilbert, Associate Chief Counsel, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Quentin Riegel, Deputy General Counsel, National Association of Manufacturers, Washington, DC, Sanjay Narayan, Sierra Club, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenors for Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the court’s order filed October 31, 2016, directing petitioners to notify the court if they wished to pursue their claims; the motion for voluntary dismissal filed by petitioners Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, Environmental Integrity Project, and Louisiana Environmental Action Network; the motion for voluntary dismissal filed by petitioners Council of Industrial Boiler Owners, American Chemistry Council, American Wood Council, American Forest and Paper Association, Southeastern Lumber Manufacturers Association, Corn Refiners Association, National Association of Manufacturers, Rubber Manufacturers Association, and the *819Chamber of Commerce; and the lack of any response to the court’s order by the remaining petitioners, it is

ORDERED that the motions be granted, and this case be dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Michael M. MASSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.