alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                              38
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,395
<INVENTORY>                                     38,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,197
<PP&E>                                          65,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,186
<SALES>                                        344,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,740
<CGS>                                          227,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               126,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,536
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,205)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,104)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel VALLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10156

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 14, 2017

Jason Hitt, USSAC—Office of the US Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Valle appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, *see United States v. Leniear,*574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009), we affirm.

Valle contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court properly concluded that Valle is ineligible for a sentence reduction because Amendment 782 did not lower his applicar ble sentencing range. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); *Leniear,*574 F.3d at 673-74. Moreover, because the court lacked authority to reduce Valle’s sentence, it had no reason to consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. *See Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 826-27, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Lynn C. GUTHRIE; Gina Lynn Guthrie, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. DITECH FINANCIAL, L.L.C., formerly known as Green Tree Servicing, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellee

No. 17-50387 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

Lynn C. Guthrie, Pro Se

Gina Lynn Guthrie, Pro Se

Daron L. Janis, Esq., Marc Daniel Cabrera, Esq., Attorney, Locke Lord, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, Joel Reid' Thomason, Locke Lord, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendant-Appellee

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Proceeding pro se as they did in the district court, Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the April 20, 2017 Final Judgment of that court dismissing all of their claims and causes of action without prejudice. We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties, the exhaustive April 20, 2017 Order of the district court, and the even more exhaustive Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge to whom the district court initially assigned this matter. As a result, we are convinced beyond cavil that the aforesaid Final Judgment of the district court is not only free of error but eminently correct. For essentially the same reasons as explicated by the district court and the magistrate judge, the judgment appealed *from*is, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4,
##### 



Exhibit 4.10
 REGEN BIOLOGICS, INC.
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
          REGEN BIOLOGICS, INC.By:Title:OPTIONEE[Insert Name]




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
TO
REGEN BIOLOGICS, INC.
INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 Grant of Option
 Vesting, Exercisability and Expiration
   Exercise Following Termination of Employment, Consulting or Director Relationship




---



##### 



Exercise




---



##### 



Nontransferability of Option
 Adjustments Upon Reorganization or Changes in Capitalization




---



##### 



Acceleration of Exercisability
 Change in Control
 Termination without Cause
 Miscellaneous
 Notices
 (i)
    
    if to the Corporation, at:
 
 (ii)
    
    if to Optionee, at the address set forth on the Cover Page,
  Compliance with Law and Regulations
 No Rights as Stockholder
 No Consulting, Employment or Director Relationship Rights
 Withholding




---



##### 



Reservation of Shares; Certain Costs
 Plan Governs
 Choice of Law
 Notice of Disqualifying Disposition
 Termination of Employment and Incentive Stock Option Status
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Lynn YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-1430

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed March 9, 2017

Michael Conrad Johnson, Office of the United States Attorney, District of Colorado, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Meredith B. Esser, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Districts of Colorado and Wyoming, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellant

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Per Curiam

This matter is before us on Appellee’s *Unopposed Motion for Summary Affir-mance.*The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Beckles v. United States,*— U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (Mar. 6, 2017). Appellant William Lynn Young does not oppose the motion.

Upon consideration, the motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
# FAA -lOIO 

# -OE%

March 18,2010 Mr. Clint Jones or Mr. Phil Ford Federal Aviation Administration 

### Transport Aircraft Directorate, ANM-1 00 1601 Lind Avenue, SW Renton, WA 98057-3356 SA530NE Configurations 1 & 3 

### PETITION

FOREXEMPTION

The Leading Edge Group, LLC (LEG), as FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) holder of SA530NE requests FAR compliance relief and submits this Petition for Exemption (PIE) to FAA rule making established under 14 CFR Sect. 26.47(c) 

### &(e)(2). lEG petitions for US Govt. engineering relief on tank Configurations 1 and 3of SA530NE for 8727-100 series aircraft, with LEG/pats Auxiliary Fuel System (AFS) inVIP passenger cabin (LOPA) deck plans. This group includes a Head of State (HOS) aircraft forthe Govt. of Gambia_ Boeing 8727-100 SNs 18323, 18752, 18933 

### & 19252: 1. These SNscontain a VIP stateroom and are configured for HOSservice. 2, These SNsoperate exclusively in private or Head of State (HOS) service. 3. These SNsare listed on foreign Registries. 4. These SNswill require extensive engineering changes for a deck plan (LOPA) to be suitable for EASAor UScommercial revenue service under FAR 121 (125 or 135). 5. Responsive engineering resources of the FAAcan be conserved and financial relief can be realized on behalf of the DAH and USGovt; upon timely approval of this PIE. 6. The Operators nor STC holder are able to determine if modifications to the AFS loadjng points on this airframe have been altered, AFS brackets removed or, ifthe AFS attach points have been adapted for other purposes; requiring in themselves new lCAs. 7. Operator disclosure and DAH-onboard AFSsurvey of the aircraft is required to submit useful engineering for FAAthat is relevant to SNexisting condition. 8. It isthe position of the STCholder that air safety will not be adversely impacted given these SNshave limited private useand, each at over 30+years of airframe age, will likely never return to commercial FAA/EASAair carrier service. In the event any of these SNsare transferred to athird party and an interior reconfiguration (LOPA) iscompleted, a current airframe survey to include #6 changes can be reviewed and specific airframe load and inspection analysis (OTE

## I D11) due FAAunder the Aging Aircraft Safety Rulefor the AFS(and the attach points) can be completed in accordance with FAR 26.47(c) and (e)(2). Sincerely, /\ 

### THlJIoIN7GE GROUP. LLC 

### Capt

# ~C.··~

Manag;ng

O;rector 

### A"sp~ng. ASE

# tot}

### ji~-1 Proprietary(j)1 N Fl. 

# &/ N 

## >1-1-520Nit" Notary Y;fJ

Mair; 

### ofllc~342.'1 G,/"/I/or; Point Kitk'~If7{/,/Nqshinytof} 9803-i Mqin (425) 576-4030
B.M.P. v. MOBILE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160232

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6181 

To authorize the Secretary of State to support the establishment of an 

ASEAN Center in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas (for himself and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of State to support the establishment of an ASEAN Center in the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S.-ASEAN Center 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ASEAN CENTER. 

7 (a) DEFINED TERM.—In this section, the term 

8 ‘‘ASEAN’’ means the Association of Southeast Asian Na9 tions. 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6181 IH

1 (b) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of State is au2 thorized to enter into a public-private partnership for the 

3 purposes of establishing a US-ASEAN Center in the 

4 United States to support United States economic and cul5 tural engagement with Southeast Asia. 

6 (c) FUNCTIONS.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, Secretary of State and the US-ASEAN Center 

8 established pursuant to subsection (b) may— 

9 (1) provide grants for research to support and 

10 elevate the importance of the US-ASEAN partner11 ship; 

12 (2) facilitate activities to strengthen US13 ASEAN trade and investment; 

14 (3) expand economic and technological relation15 ships between ASEAN countries and the United 

16 States into new areas of cooperation; 

17 (4) provide training to United States citizens 

18 and citizens of ASEAN countries that improve peo19 ple-to-people ties; 

20 (5) develop educational programs to increase 

21 awareness for the United States and ASEAN coun22 tries on the importance of relations between the 

23 United States and ASEAN countries; and 

24 (6) carry out other activities the Secretary con25 siders necessary to strengthen ties between the 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6181 IH

1 United States and ASEAN countries and achieve the 

2 objectives of the US-ASEAN Center. 

3 (d) AUTHORITY.—This section may be carried out 

4 using any amounts authorized to be appropriated to the 

5 Secretary of State, including amounts authorized to carry 

6 out chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act 

7 of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2346 et seq.). 

8 (e) PARAMETERS.—In carrying out this section, the 

9 Secretary shall ensure that the activities of the US10 ASEAN Center do not duplicate current lines of effort 

11 being conducted by the United States Government or its 

12 grantees. 

Æ 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
James William YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 138 (Friday, July 18, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41948-41949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-16816]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0764; FRL-9913-93-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
New Mexico; Grant County Sulfur Dioxide Limited Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a limited maintenance plan submitted by the State of New 
Mexico, dated November 1, 2013, for the Grant County maintenance area 
for the 1971 sulfur dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air 
Quality Standard (NAAQS). New Mexico submitted this limited

[[Page 41949]]

maintenance plan to fulfill the second 10-year maintenance plan 
requirement, under section 175A(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), to 
ensure maintenance of the 1971 SO2 NAAQS through 2025. The 
EPA is also proposing to approve a monitoring network modification for 
the area. The EPA is proposing to approve these revisions pursuant to 
the CAA.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 18, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air 
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the Addresses section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dayana Medina (6PD-L), Air 
Planning Section, telephone (214) 665-7241, fax (214) 665-6762, email: 
medina.dayana@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's request for a limited 
maintenance plan submitted on November 1, 2013, for the Grant County 
maintenance area for the 1971 sulfur dioxide SO2 NAAQS 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments 
are received in response to this action, no further activity is 
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule 
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this action should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule, which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 7, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-16816 Filed 7-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 620 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 620

    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2023

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Tonko, and Ms. Waters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of the 
 National Institutes of Health pursuant to reports and recommendations 
            made under the National Alzheimer's Project Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alzheimer's Accountability and 
Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROJECT.

    Section 2 of the National Alzheimer's Project Act (42 U.S.C. 11225) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following:
    ``(h) Professional Judgment Budget.--For fiscal year 2024 and each 
subsequent fiscal year, the Director of the National Institutes of 
Health shall prepare and submit, directly to the President for review 
and transmittal to Congress, after reasonable opportunity for comment, 
but without change, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
the Advisory Council, an annual budget estimate for the initiatives of 
the National Institutes of Health pursuant to the reports and 
recommendations made under this Act, including an estimate of the 
number and type of personnel needs for the National Institutes of 
Health.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TAPISTRON INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE YEAR
         ENDED JULY 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
         SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                      247
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                32
<INVENTORY>                                 1,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,138
<PP&E>                                      1,446
<DEPRECIATION>                              873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              5,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       669
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    14
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                5,883
<SALES>                                     5,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,652
<CGS>                                       3,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            2,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (39)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (209)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (209)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>

                               Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
                           Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
                             ( in thousands, except per share amounts )

Primary Earnings Per Common Share
<CAPTION>
                        Quarter ended October 5,   Nine months ended October 5,
                        ________________________   ___________________________
                              1996      1997           1996       1997  
                             ______    _______        ______     ______
<S>                       <C>        <C>            <C>        <C> 
Net income for the period $   2,619  $   4,540      $  3,117   $ 11,647
                          =========  =========      ========   ========


Weighted common share         9,424     11,269         7,228     10,949

Dilutive effect of 
options outstanding 
during the period               288        348           249        317
                             ______    _______        ______     ______


Total common and common   
equivalent shares             9,712     11,617         7,477     11,266
                          =========  =========      ========   ======== 


Earnings per common share $    0.27  $    0.39      $   0.42   $   1.02


            Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share

                        Quarter ended October 5,   Nine months ended October 5,
                        ________________________   ___________________________
                              1996      1997           1996       1997  
                             ______    _______        ______     ______

Net income for the period $   2,619  $   4,540      $  3,117   $ 11,647
                          =========  =========      ========   ========


Weighted common share         9,424     11,269         7,228     10,949

Dilutive effect of 
options outstanding 
during the period               401        433           401        433
                             ______    _______        ______     ______


Total common and common   
equivalent shares             9,825     11,702         7,629     11,382
                          =========  =========      ========   ======== 


Earnings per common share $    0.27  $    0.39      $   0.41   $   1.01

</TABLE>
                             E-88