alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.18


HYSTER-YALE MATERIALS HANDLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Director Fee Policy (Amended Effective as of January 1, 2019)




This Director fee policy shall apply to each Director of Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.  (Hyster-Yale) or one of its subsidiaries, other than (i) Directors who are full-time employees of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries or (ii) Directors who have entered into separate written fee agreements authorized by the Board of Directors and executed by an authorized officer of Hyster-Yale or one of its subsidiaries.


Each Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer, of $178,000, payable quarterly in arrears. Each quarterly payment shall consist of $15,000 in cash and $29,500 worth of Hyster-Yale Class A Common Stock, transfer of which is restricted pursuant to the terms of the Hyster-Yale Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation Plan.  


Each Director of Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. who is not a Director of Hyster-Yale will receive an annual retainer of $20,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $5,000.


Each Chairman of a Committee of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors will receive an additional annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $10,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $2,500; provided, however, that the Chairman of the Audit Review Committee will receive an annual Committee Chairman’s fee of $15,000, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $3,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as Chairman of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.


Each member of a Committee (other than the Executive Committee) of the Hyster-Yale Board of Directors, including Committee Chairmen, will receive an additional annual Committee member’s fee of $7,000 for each Committee on which such Director serves, payable in cash quarterly in arrears in installments of $1,750.  100% of all fees paid for service as a member of a Committee is attributable to services for Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries.


Each Director of Hyster-Yale or a Hyster-Yale subsidiary will be paid a meeting fee of (a) $1,000 for each Hyster-Yale or subsidiary Board meeting attended, provided that no Director shall be paid for attendance at more than one Board meeting on any single day, and (b) $1,000 for each Committee meeting attended.  In the case of either joint meeting or joint committee meetings, the fees associated with that meeting will be allocated among the companies that actually met. 


This amended policy is effective as of January 1, 2019
NUMBER 13-18-00058-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GORDON DEAN HALEY, ANTON SCOTT HALEY, 

GORDON DEAN HALEY AS INDEPENDENT 

CO-EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

MARGARET L. HALEY, AND ANTON SCOTT HALEY

AS INDEPENDENT CO-EXECUTOR OF THE 

ESTATE OF MARGARET L. HALEY, Appellants,

v.

BENEFICIAL FINANCIAL I INC., 

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BENEFICIAL TEXAS, INC., Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Order Per Curiam
2

Appellant Gordon Dean Haley and others perfected an appeal from a summary 

judgment rendered in trial court cause number 2015DCV-1306-C in the 94th District 

Court of Nueces county, Texas. Appellant Haley has now filed a motion for emergency 

relief, temporary restraining order, and stay of execution pending appeal. He requests 

that we stay the writ of execution and possession issued in the underlying case pending 

resolution of this appeal. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered this motion, is of the opinion 

that it should be granted pending receipt and review of a response filed by appellee, 

Beneficial Financial I Inc., Successor by Merger to Beneficial Texas, Inc. Accordingly, 

we order the Writ of Possession and Writ of Execution, and all other post-judgment 

proceedings, to be stayed pending further order of this Court. We request appellee to 

file a response to appellant’s motion for temporary relief, temporary restraining order, 

and stay of execution within seven days from the date of this order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM 

Delivered and filed the

20th day of March, 2019.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1346 KA 11-01632**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CEDRICK K. BRADBERRY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Sperrazza, J.), rendered July 1, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.31). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence ( see id. at 255; see generally People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: December 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Jeffrey F. Tarplin, Admitted on June 17, 1985, at a Term of the Appellate Division, First Department.

[772 NYS2d 805]

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. *[See*257 AD2d 127 (1999).]
#### Home Surplus of Brooklyn, Inc., Respondent, v Home Surplus, Inc., et al., Defendants. Boris Schvartsman et al., Nonparty Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 904]

In an action, inter alia, to recover payments due under promissory notes, the nonparties, Boris Schvartsman, Igor Koval, Thomas Agrachov, and Oleg Agrachov, appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated February 27, 2003, which, inter alia, found them to be in civil contempt and imposed a fine upon each of them in the amount of $20,000.

Ordered that the amended order is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision reciting that the conduct of Boris Schvartsman, Igor Koval, Thomas Agrachov, and Oleg Agrachov was calculated to, or actually did, defeat, impair, impede, or prejudice the rights or remedies of the plaintiff; as so modified, *473the amended order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff clearly demonstrated that the appellants took action, in violation of a court order, which was “calculated to or actually did defeat, impair, impede, or prejudice” its rights *(Goldsmith v Goldsmith,*261 AD2d 576, 577 [1999]; *see*Judiciary Law § 753 [A] [3]; *McCain v Dinkins,*84 NY2d 216, 225-227 [1994]; *Matter of McCormick v Axelrod,*59 NY2d 574, 582-584 [1983]). In opposing the plaintiffs motion, the appellants submitted no evidence to contradict the plaintiffs proof of civil contempt and prejudice. Under these circumstances, the trial, court’s omission of the recital required by Judiciary Law § 770 was a “mere irregularity not affecting the substantial rights of the parties, which this Court has the inherent power to correct” *(Peters v Sage Group Assoc.,*238 AD2d 123, 124 [1997]; *see*CPLR 5019 [a]; *Vastwin Invs. v Aquarius Media Corp.,*295 AD2d 216, 217 [2002]; *Hasegawa v Hasegawa,*281 AD2d 594, 595 [2001]; *Barkan v Barkan,*271 AD2d 466 [2000]; *Goldsmith v Goldsmith, supra*at 578).

Moreover, the plaintiff demonstrated that it suffered at least $80,000 in actual loss or injury caused by reason of the appellants’ misconduct, an amount which the appellants never disputed. Accordingly, the trial court properly imposed a $20,000 fine on each of the four appellants without conducting a hearing in order to sufficiently indemnify the plaintiff for the wrongdoing *(see State of New York v Unique Ideas,*44 NY2d 345, 349 [1978]; *cf. Matter of Barclays Bank v Hughes,*306 AD2d 406, 407 [2003]; *Berkowitz v Astro Moving & Stor. Co.,*240 AD2d 450, 452 [1997]). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2014

No. 04-14-00744-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.C., P.C., JR., AND A.C.,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01143

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Paul Castillo's First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to January 4, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of December, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Willie MCCRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2784

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        Virtual meeting.                         *Note:*                         Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, we will conduct the open meeting virtually. If you would like to access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public. To access the virtual meeting, go to the commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Democracy Engine, Inc., PAC (A19-18)

Proposed Rule of Agency Procedure Concerning the Treatment of Foreign State Respondents at the Initiation of the Enforcement Process

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-03059 Filed 2-9-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Henry Clay SMITH III v. STATE

CR-16-0651

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7762
GERALD DAVIS FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PARRIS GLENDENING, Governor; BISHOP ROBINSON, Secretary; RICHARD LANHAM, SR.; STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3068-S) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court, with the modification that the dismissal be without prejudice. Fuller v. Glendening , No. CA-95-3068-S (D. Md. Oct. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from __________ to __________
 Commission file number 0-15327
 CYTRX CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    58-1642740(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)11726 San Vicente Blvd. 
Suite 650
Los Angeles, CA
(Address of principal executive 
offices)
    
    90049
(Zip Code)
 (310) 826-5648
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
 o þ
 þ o
 þ
  o þ o
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTESPART IVITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.SIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSEXHIBIT 31.1EXHIBIT 31.2    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTES
   2




---



##### Table of Contents



PART IV
 
 ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
  3




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  CYTRX CORPORATION 
(Registrant)Date: January 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ MITCHELL K. FOGELMANMitchell K. FogelmanChief Financial Officer 4




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 5
JENSHAW, LLC, Appellant, v. PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D16-4300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 12, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Quayshun Addnus Donte LEWIS, DOC #Y50140, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-885

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6007 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6007

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a 
               microemployer pension plan startup credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2023

 Ms. Tenney (for herself and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill

                            October 25, 2023

              Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a 
               microemployer pension plan startup credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retirement Investment in Small 
Employers Act''.

SEC. 2. MICROEMPLOYER PENSION PLAN STARTUP CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Credit for Microemployers.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a qualified 
        microemployer--
                    ``(A) subsection (a) shall be applied by 
                substituting `100 percent' for `50 percent', and
                    ``(B) subsection (b)(1) shall be applied by 
                substituting `$2,500' for `$500' in subparagraph (A) 
                thereof.
            ``(2) Qualified microemployer.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `qualified microemployer' means an 
        employer which would be an eligible employer if section 
        408(p)(2)(C)(i)(I) were applied by substituting `10' for `100', 
        but only if the eligible employer plan established or 
        maintained by such employer, under the terms of the plan, 
        accepts payment of the matching contribution under section 
        6433.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
                                 <all>
```
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

09/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Rodney Carter,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Christopher &Banks Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q****for the period ended August 29, 2009 as filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: October 8,  2009 |     |                                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |     |                                                               |
|                        | By:      | /s/ Rodney Carter                                                  |
|                        | * * | Rodney Carter *Executive Vice President,**Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marquez McFadden, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 617]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about November 24, 1998, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Sullivan and Rosenberger, JJ.
Pilot name: Karey Rowley

License number: 3172626

Phone number: 435-633-5329
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, David S. Lee, Chief
Executive Officer of Registrant , certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: October 30, 2006 |  | /s/    DAVID S.
LEE                 
|                       |  | David S. Lee Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of eOn Communications Corporation
(Registrant) I, Stephen R. Bowling, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant.



|                       |  |                                           
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: October 30, 2006 |  | /s/    STEPHEN R.
BOWLING                 
|                       |  | Stephen R. Bowling Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F of our report dated November 30, 1998, related to the divisional
balance sheet of Ledcor Industries Limited--Telecommunications Division as at
May 31, 1998 and the divisional statements of operations and retained earnings
and cash flows for the nine months ended May 31, 1998 and the year ended August
31, 1997, which appear in Amendment No. 2 to 360networks inc.'s Registration
Statement on Form F-1 (No. 333-95621), filed with the Commission on April 18,
2000 and listed in the accompanying index.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Edmonton, Canada
April 19, 2000