alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6167 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6167

  To provide additional housing protections for survivors of domestic 
                   violence, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2023

  Mrs. Sykes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide additional housing protections for survivors of domestic 
                   violence, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Break Free From Domestic Violence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR EARLY LEASE 
              TERMINATION.

    Section 41411 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 
12491) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Prohibition on the Imposition of Fees for Early Lease 
Termination.--
            ``(1) Voluntary exit.--An applicant for or tenant of 
        housing assisted under a covered housing program may 
        voluntarily exit a lease for housing earlier than the end date 
        of such lease on the basis that the applicant or tenant has 
        been a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual 
        assault, or stalking.
            ``(2) Fee prohibition.--Notwithstanding any lease 
        agreement, an applicant or tenant described in paragraph (1) 
        may not be charged a fee for exiting a lease for housing 
        earlier than the end date of such lease on the basis described 
        in paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6117 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6117

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board of 
  Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market 
               Committee to focus on maximum employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2023

 Mr. Hill (for himself and Mr. Donalds) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board of 
  Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market 
               Committee to focus on maximum employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Price Stability Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF DUAL MANDATE.

    Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 225a) is amended 
by striking ``maximum employment, stable prices,'' and inserting 
``stable prices''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


         In reference to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed today by 3CI Complete Compliance
Corporation (the "Company") with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, I,
Otley L. Smith, III, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer,
certify as follows, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002):

                (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78o(d)); and

                (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Otley L. Smith III
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Otley L. Smith III
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       3CI Complete Compliance Corporation

                                       August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000883720
<NAME> CELOX LABORATORIES INC
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                270,036
<SECURITIES>                                          459,436
<RECEIVABLES>                                          24,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                            40,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      823,078
<PP&E>                                                446,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                        286,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,041,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 129,104
<BONDS>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                               27,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                            884,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,041,174
<SALES>                                                48,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       48,541
<CGS>                                                  22,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          49,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (84,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (84,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (84,133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Raul GARATE-VELARDE, also known as Marco Antonio Sanchez-Velarde, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11380 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed June 20, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s. Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Raul Garate-Velarde, Pro Se

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Garate-Velarde has moved for leave *138to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garate-Velarde has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R, 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *138published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Julio Alejandro ARIAS-BARRON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40362 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Julio Alejandro Arias-Barron, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*905PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Julio Alejandro Arias-Barron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arias-Barron has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of .the record, reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Corey CRAIG v. STATE

CR-16-0209

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 30, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Mark Anthony PEYSEN, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10252 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Mark Anthony Peysen, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mark Anthony Peysen has moved for leave *899to -withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Peysen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *899the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6117 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate on the Board 

of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open 

Market Committee to focus on maximum employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2023 

Mr. HILL (for himself and Mr. DONALDS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the mandate 

on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee to focus 

on maximum employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Price Stability Act of 

5 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6117 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF DUAL MANDATE. 

2 Section 2A of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 

3 225a) is amended by striking ‘‘maximum employment, sta4 ble prices,’’ and inserting ‘‘stable prices’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Sergio ESTRADA-ZAMARRIPA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-40307 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Sergio Estrada-Zamarripa, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sergio Estrada-Zamarripa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Estrada-Zamarripa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Estrada-Zamarripa’s response. We concur with counsel’s assess*911ment that the appeal presents no nonfrivo-lous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Edwin L. DEMPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2230

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03157]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting and Hearing Notice No. 02-22]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 503.25) and the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
open meetings as follows:

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, February 23, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. EST.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference. There will be no 
physical meeting place.

STATUS: Open. Members of the public who wish to observe the meeting via 
teleconference should contact Patricia M. Hall, Foreign Claims 
Settlement Commission, Tele: (202) 616-6975, two business days in 
advance of the meeting. Individuals will be given call-in information 
upon notice of attendance to the Commission.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 10:00 a.m.--Issuance of Proposed Decisions 
under the Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act, Title XVII, Public 
Law 114-328.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for information, advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, and requests for 
teleconference dial-in information may be directed to: Patricia M. 
Hall, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 441 G St NW, Room 6234, 
Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6975.

Jeremy R. LaFrancois,
Chief Administrative Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2022-03157 Filed 2-10-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-BA-P
#### Cesar Peralta ESCALANTE, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-71926

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 3, 2017

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, AZ, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Lisa Damiano, Lisa Morinelli, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2),

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Peralta Escalante, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Peralta Escalante’s contentions regarding the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal as addressed in the BIA’s August 9, 2011, order, where this petition for review is not timely as to that order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1262(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.”); *Pinto v. Holder,*648 F.3d 976, 986 (9th Cir. 2011) (a BIA order denying relief from removal, but remanding for voluntary departure proceedings, is a final order of removal); *Rizo v. Lynch,*810 F.3d 688, 691 (9th Cir. 2016) (clarifying that *Abdisalan v. Holder,*774 F.3d 617 (9th Cir. 2014), does not disrupt the *Pinto*line of cases).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 3:13 PM

To: 'bdeclet@measure32.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Measure, a 32 Advisors Company, LLC

Mr. Declet,

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

1602).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

* Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the proposed UAS

operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be located

in the aircraft manual(s).  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/18/15.  If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
**ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S**  **MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF Page**  **1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA** 

**Supreme Court Cause No. DA**  **23**
**- 0394**  DAN H. WOOODARDS, JR. , Pl aint iff /A ppellant ,

v. GARY WOODARDS, CAROL WOOD, TERRI LASELL, BARBARA WOODARDS , ESTATE OF DAN HOOVER WOODARDS, SR., and ESTATE OF DORIS WOODARDS. Defendant s/Respondents. **ORDER**

Having reviewed Appellant Dan H. Woodards, Jr.’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Reply Brief and good cause appearing th erefrom , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED th at Appellant’s mot io n is GRANTED and his reply brief shall be filed no later than January 11, 2024. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 27 2023

12/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0394
Phillip Van ZANT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2606

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6050 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit kindergarten through 

grade 12 educational expenses to be paid from a 529 account. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mr. HERN (for himself, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mrs. HINSON, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, 

Mr. KUSTOFF, and Mr. ESTES) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

kindergarten through grade 12 educational expenses to 

be paid from a 529 account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Empowerment 

5 Act’’. 

2 

•HR 6050 IH

1 SEC. 2. 529 ACCOUNT FUNDING FOR HOMESCHOOL AND AD2 DITIONAL ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EX3 PENSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(7) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(7) TREATMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SEC7 ONDARY TUITION.—Any reference in this section to 

8 the term ‘qualified higher education expense’ shall 

9 include a reference to the following expenses in con10 nection with enrollment or attendance at, or for stu11 dents enrolled at or attending, an elementary or sec12 ondary public, private, or religious school: 

13 ‘‘(A) Tuition. 

14 ‘‘(B) Curriculum and curricular materials. 

15 ‘‘(C) Books or other instructional mate16 rials. 

17 ‘‘(D) Online educational materials. 

18 ‘‘(E) Tuition for tutoring or educational 

19 classes outside of the home, including at a tu20 toring facility, but only if the tutor or instruc21 tor is not related to the student and— 

22 ‘‘(i) is licensed as a teacher in any 

23 State, 

24 ‘‘(ii) has taught at an eligible edu25 cational institution, or 

3 

•HR 6050 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) is a subject matter expert in the 

2 relevant subject. 

3 ‘‘(F) Fees for a nationally standardized 

4 norm-referenced achievement test, an advanced 

5 placement examination, or any examinations re6 lated to college or university admission. 

7 ‘‘(G) Fees for dual enrollment in an insti8 tution of higher education. 

9 ‘‘(H) Educational therapies for students 

10 with disabilities provided by a licensed or ac11 credited practitioner or provider, including oc12 cupational, behavioral, physical, and speech-lan13 guage therapies. 

14 Such term shall include expenses for the purposes 

15 described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) in con16 nection with a homeschool (whether treated as a 

17 homeschool or a private school for purposes of appli18 cable State law).’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ