1

SEPTEMBER 1 7 , 2015

ATTN :

U. S. D EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DOCKET OPERATIONS WEST BUILDING GROUND FLOOR, ROOM W12

- 140
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE, SE WASHINGTON, DC 20590

RE:

CURTIS L. TILLY REQUEST AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE
14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERAT ION OF DJI Phantom
3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95)

CURTIS L. TILLY
4120 IVERSON ST. RALEIGH, NC 27604
919

- 673

- 4527 cltilly@gmail.com2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................

......... ........3

SUMMARY......................................................................................................................

. .... ....... 4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER....................................................

...... 4

BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................

. ...... 4

BASIS FOR PETITION........................................................................................................

....... . 5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER.......................

............ ...................................... ....... 6
THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH CURTIS L. TILLY

SEEKS EX EMPTION...........................

........................................... ... ............... ....... .................... 7

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF CURTIS L. TILLY SEEKS AND THE REASON C URTIS L.

TILLY SEEKS THE R ELIEF.....

........................................................................... .................... 1 0

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING CURTIS L. TILLY ’S REQUEST WOULD

BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ..........................

............ . ................. .......................... . ........... 1 2

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO CURTIS L. TILLY

WOULD NOT ADVE RSELY AFFECT SAFETY..........................

................ .... ...................... 1 4

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER....

.......... .. . .. ...... 25

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS A VAILABLE TO

SUPPORT CURTIS L. TILLY ’S R EQUEST...

.......................................... . . ... ................ ......... 25

CONCLUSION.......................

..................................................................................... . ........ ...... 2 5

APPENDICES...............................................................

. ........................ ...... 2 73 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Posi tioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernizatio n and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Ai rcraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing4 SUMMARY

CURTIS L. TILLY seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System ( DJI Phantom 3 ) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit CURTIS L. TILLY to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of construction si tes, residential and commercial real estate, civil landscape s and events over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

CURTIS L. TILLY is a licensed commer cial pilot who has provided enterprise

- wide video solutions for a number of FORTUNE 500 companies across North America. He is a current Certified Flight Instructor and the owner of multiple aircraft. The objective of CURTIS L. TILLY

and his Unmanned Aircraft System ( DJI Phantom 3 ) aerial operations is to provide a more affordable

, high

- quality flight photography system for a variety of governmental, commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting

• C onstruction sites before , during, and after

• Tower and vertical structure inspection

• Appraisals

• Real

- estate marketing

• Economic development

• Civic landmarks

• Special event coverage

• Private and governmental training

Mr. Tilly has an extensive aviation backgr ound with approximately 2000 hours PIC over the past
twenty years . Additionally, Mr. Tilly has operated vertical lift R/C devices recreationally for
over two years.

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 3

, UAS

CURTIS L. TILLY seeks an exemption to operate DJI Phantom 3 system for compensation or hire

within the NAS. The DJI Phantom 3 is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The

DJI Phantom 3 has a maximu m gross weight of approximately 2.8 lb. while having a diagonal
dimension of 23.2” , a maximum speed of approximately 16.4’fps and a maximum flying height of5

400'

. The DJI Phantom 3 is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

The DJI Phantom 3 that will be operated by CURTIS L. TILLY will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Airc raft Registration

, and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, CURTIS L. TILLY , pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Mo dernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the DJI Phantom 3

, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Curtis L. Tilly operation of DJI Phantom 3 UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, Curtis L. Tilly requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

Curtis L. Tilly submits that the req uested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be

ensured. Curtis L. Tilly will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practice s prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Curtis L. Tilly will document and maintain all maintenance

records for the DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Relief from certain requirements of S ection 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and

limitations: Pilot in command , is requested by Curtis L. Tilly to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airm an medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers an d maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Curtis L. Tilly seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness

, because the

DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accor dance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Curtis L. Tilly submits that he will ensure that the DJI Pha ntom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UAS are in compliance6

with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight.

Curtis L. Tilly also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimet er Settings , as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However,

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined

with Curtis L. Tilly ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below

4 00 feet AGL, will ensure a l evel of safety equivalent to Section 91.121.

Additionally, Curtis L. Tilly seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b),

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

. Curtis L. Tilly submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total

duration of approximately 23 minutes . Battery power indicators are also able t o show exactly how much battery power is left, as well as how much time is needed to return safely back to point of

take

- off

.
In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Curtis L. Tilly provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

Curtis L. Tilly
4120 Iverson St. Raleigh, NC 27604 (919) 850

- 4527 cltilly@gmail.com7

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption.

1. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command

, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an airc raft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if

—
(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or prop erty for compensation or hire.

2. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a ) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

--
(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to

--

(i) The current reported altimeter s etting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station;

o r

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection

(b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the8 first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance require d , subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft

—
(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, hav e discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding,
or alteration

, subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless

--
(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, n o person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had

--
(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapte r; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section:

( 1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records

of the 100

- hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller,

rotor , and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include

--9 (i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate nu mber of the person approving the aircraft

for return to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and

each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life

- limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, includ ing the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section sh all be retained and

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.10

C. The Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Tilly Seeks And The Rea son Curtis L. Tilly Seeks The

Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Tilly Seeks And The Reason Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in

command , is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight

hour and currency requirements, to conduct the propo sed UAS flight operations for compensation

or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business o r employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Curtis L. Tilly submits that an equivalent level of safe ty will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight

- hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate either the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consi stent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Further, Curtis L. Tilly submits that all flight s of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Curtis L. Tilly ’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Tilly Seeks And The Reason Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required

to allow Curtis L. Tilly to determine that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworth y condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Curtis L. Tilly Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual).

Curtis L. Tilly seeks the requested r elief because the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Curtis L. Tilly will ensure that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance

with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 ) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the

conditions and limitations below.11

3. Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Till y Seeks And The Reason Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Relief From

Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings , may be required to allow flight operations

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude informatio n concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Curtis L. Tilly seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 3 UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local baro metric pressure or field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As

more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom

3 UAS are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prio r to each flight, and provides

the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads

- up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Tilly Seeks And The Reason Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) en titled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a tot al

duration of 23 minutes. Curtis L. Tilly seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or sti ll photo flight operations that Curtis L. Tilly proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , the DJI
Phantom 3 operating documents, and Curtis L. Tilly ’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Curtis L. Tilly will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 23 minutes

.

5. Extent Of Relief Curtis L. Tilly Seeks And The Reason Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Curtis L. Tilly requests relief from these Sections because

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require airworthiness cert ificates. As set forth more fully below,

the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Curtis L. Tilly will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or pre ventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Curtis L. Tilly Aerial12

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Curtis L. Tilly will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI
Phantom 3 UAS

. D. The Reasons Why Granting Curtis L. Tilly Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petitio n will further the public interest by allowing Curtis L. Tilly to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, towers, real estate, events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States.

A dditionally, use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Curtis L. Tilly ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be realized withou t implicating any privacy

issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing t he use

of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft o perating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS

. Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight o perations. By using battery power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS produce no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically util ized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately

20

- 30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS , while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the DJI Phantom 3 UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditio nal manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS (weighing approximately 2 .8 pounds at their maximum gross weight with diagonal dimension of 23.2 inches

,13

and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing a pproximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the DJI
Phantom 3 UAS will allow United States based companies, like Curtis L. Tilly , to remai n competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must ado pt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 UAS is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibili ty without the high operational cost of a traditional

manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, companies such as Curtis L. Tilly , can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and fed eral tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United

States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, Curtis L. Tilly ’s proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., Curtis L. Tilly Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI
Phantom 3 Instruction Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordanc e with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.14

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The

Rule From Which Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 UA S Meet s The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Curtis L. Tilly ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS meet s the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a) In General.

-- Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the nat ional airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-- In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum

--
(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United Stat es Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.

-- If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the natio nal airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Curtis L. Tilly submits that the DJI Phantom 3 UAS can operate safely in the NAS pu rsuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the DJI
Phantom 3 UAS ; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.15

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Char acteristics.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS do es not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 UAS

. The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth by the DJI Phantom

3 Use r Manual , att ached hereto as Appendix A

.

ii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.

The DJI Phantom 3 UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom

3 UAS is provided at pages 11 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual att ached hereto as Appen dix A

.

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 UAS Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will remain stationary, in flight, for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS do es not reacquire

control link data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control Link is lost and the will return to the home position (i.e., fails afe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.

A complete description of the Failsaf e Functions of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS are set forth
at pages 12 through 14 of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manual, attached hereto as Appendix

A

.

iv. The DJI Phantom 3 GCS And Its Operation.

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 GCS and flight control software is provided at pages 23 through 29 of the DJI Phantom 3 User
Manual. DJI Phantom 3 User Manual is att ached hereto as Appendix A

. b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Certificated Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

Curtis L. Tilly will be the only person to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 3

UAS . Additionally, a safety observer will assist him at all times during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 3 UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating

Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Curtis L. Tilly proposes to comme rcially operate DJI Phantom 3 UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations

.16 1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing less than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a pe tition to amend this
grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UA S may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 4 00 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in

feet AGL.

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS cap ability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration o f the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and t he grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the opera ting documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operat ing documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AF S

- 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.17 10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affe cts the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspecti on. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, mu st undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, n ot already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out i ts maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time i n service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service.

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety

Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an en try in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The PIC must possess at least a private pilot certificate and at least a current third

class medical certificate.

18. The operator may no t permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency mane uvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitt ed under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered

nonpar ticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.18 19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under vi sual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not

authorized.

20. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as

denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request.

21. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre

determined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

23 . The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough po wer to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance wit h airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N

Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and

control of th e UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official
upon request.19 29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of o perating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled

- access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight

to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Curtis L. Tilly submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requiremen ts, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Considering Curtis L . Tilly ’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forth

above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of20

commercial pilot requirements ( See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills ne cessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS, Curtis L. Tilly submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Curtis L. Tilly ’s specific proposed fl ight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 1110 9, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

Curtis L. Tilly will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 3 UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and mo del of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior document ed flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during Curtis L. Tilly ’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have acc umulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also ha ve accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi

- rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in th e preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight

- hour requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operatio ns. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemp tion to accomplish the required flight time. During21

training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.

Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, Curtis L. Tilly will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the

DJI Phantom 3 UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight

- hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every flight, Curtis L. Tilly will ensure that the DJ I Phantom 3 UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions

and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 1111 2, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintain ed because the

altitude information of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This al titude information, combined with Curtis L. Tilly ’s operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 500 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equi pment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UAS at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in a ll material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).22

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements O f Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS ; (2) the

limitat ions on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, Curtis L. Tilly will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom

3 UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total

duration of 23 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS ; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will

ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 3 UAS provide audible and visual warnings to the PIC

at the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage, the first warning o ccurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will descend and land automatically.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by th e FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescri bed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos.

8 811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409( a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Curtis L. Tilly submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Curtis L. Tilly will

use train ed technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Curtis L. Tilly Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Ph antom 3 Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Curtis L. Tilly will document and maintain all maintenance records for the

DJI Phantom 3 UAS.

Since the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, Curtis L. Tilly will maintain t he equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 3 User Manuals are attached hereto as23

Appendix A and B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS Maintenance LOG is attached hereto as Appendi x C.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Curtis L. Tilly will use trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by t he operating documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS will be performed by trained technicians. Main tenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adv ersely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

In consideration of Curtis L. Tilly ’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS

, Curt is L. Tilly submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS

in circumstances sim ilar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions

, Curtis L. Tilly requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended ope ration of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special

conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of t he United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the

authori ty for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Co nditions , states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of t he aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he24

prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft en gine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Curtis L Tilly ’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS , which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to e stablish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).25

A Summary That Can Be Pub lished In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which Curtis L. Tilly Seeks Exemption:

Curtis L. Tilly seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & ( a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Curtis L. Tilly Seeks:

This exemption will permit Curtis L. Tilly to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and phot ography over certain areas of the United States.

Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Curtis L. Tilly ’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Curtis L. Tilly ’s request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 , as set forth above.

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to o perate without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, Curtis L. Tilly will operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, Curtis L. Tilly seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation

of the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially, without an air worthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the

FAA Modernization and R eform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Curtis L. Tilly to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulat ions and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Curtis L. Tilly respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Leading Edge to operate the DJI Phantom 3 UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of th e United States.26

Dated: September 1 7 , 201 5

Respectfully submitted

,

Curtis L. Tilly
4120 Iverson St. Raleigh, NC 27604 (919) 673

- 4527 cltilly@gmail.com27

Appendices :

A. DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUALAPPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

1APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

2APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

3APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

4APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

5APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

6APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

7APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

8APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

9APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

10APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

11APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

12APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

13APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

14APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

15APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

16APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

17APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

18APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

19APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

20APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

21APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

22APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

23APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

24APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

25APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

26APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

27APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

28APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

29APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

30APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

31APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

32APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

33APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

34APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

35APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

36APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

37APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

38APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

39APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

40APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

41APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

42APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

43APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

44APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

45APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

46APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

47APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

48APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

49APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

50APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

51APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

52APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

53APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

54APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

55APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

56APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

57APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

58APPENDIX A . DJI PHANTOM 3 USER MANUAL

59