alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. DiNella, the Chief Financial Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.

Date: May 2, 2007



| |  |                                          
| |  | -----------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ RONALD M. DINELLA                    
| |  | Ronald M. DiNella Chief Financial
Officer
Eliseo SALDANA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3747

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PETER KOSTYSHYN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

NEW CASTLE COUNTY,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 311, 2023

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ C.A. No. N22J-02872

§ 

§

§

Submitted: November 6, 2023

Decided: November 7, 2023

Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response, 

it appears to the Court that:

(1) The appellant, Peter Kostyshyn, filed this appeal from a monition action 

in the Superior Court. On August 30, 2023 and September 26, 2023, the Clerk’s 

office sent letters advising Kostyshyn to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed 

in forma pauperis, first by September 14, 2023 and then by October 10, 2023. The 

Clerk’s office warned Kostyshyn that if he failed to do so a notice to show cause 

would issue. The Clerk’s office sent the letters to the addresses provided by 

Kostyshyn and his sister, Patricia Kostyshyn, who had filed the same documents. 
2

(2) On September 27, 2023, the Deputy Prothonotary submitted a letter 

stating that Kostyshyn had not paid the Superior Court’s appeal preparation fee. The 

Clerk’s office sent Kostyshyn a letter withdrawing the record deadline and directing 

him to pay the Superior Court’s appeal preparation fee by October 10, 2023, or a 

notice to show cause would issue. Kostyshyn did not pay this Court’s filing fee or 

the Superior Court’s appeal preparation fee. He also failed to file a motion to 

proceed in forma pauperis. 

(3) On October 11, 2023 and October 12, 2023, the Clerk’s office issued 

notices, by certified mail, directing Kostyshyn to show cause why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for his failure to pay this Court’s filing fee and the Superior Court’s

appeal preparation fee. Postal records show that both notices to show cause were

returned with the notation “return to sender, vacant, unable to forward.” On October 

23, 2023, the Clerk’s office reissued the notices to show cause by first class mail. 

The Court’s correspondence and notices to show cause were sent to the addresses

that the Kostyshyns provided, and continue to provide, to this Court.

(4) On October 25, 2023, November 3, 2023, and November 6, 2023,

Kostyshyn filed documents that are deemed to be his response to the notice to show 

cause. The documents do not address his failure to pay this Court’s filing fee or the 

Superior Court’s appeal preparation fee. In light of Kostyshyn’s failure to pay those

fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, this appeal must be dismissed.
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
Ray Winston FRIERSON, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-481

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed December 8, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
LOGAN'S ROADHOUSE, INC. v. GANAWAY CONTRACTING CO.

1150288

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 17, 2017

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Rehan HANIF

1160343 (CR-15-0100)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

Cert. denied.
Alice MINCH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Audrey TAYLOR, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-0206

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
HSBC (LOGO)

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, HSBC Mortgage  Corporation (USA)
has complied in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   Uniform  Single
Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period, HSBC
Mortgage  Corporation (USA) had in effect fidelity bond and errors and omissions
policies in the amount of $550,000,000 and $50,000,000 respectively.

David J. Hunter
President

Daniel B. Duggan
SVP,Secondary Marketing

Susan Wojnar
SVP, Mortgage Servicing


HSBC  Mortgage  Corporation  (USA) 2929  Walden  Avenue,  Depew,  NY 14043 EQUAL
HOUSING LENDER (Logo)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond L. Brightman, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 671]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 9, 2003, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

By decision of an Administrative Law Judge dated February 21, 2003, claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. Claimant admitted receiving the decision shortly *781after it was mailed but failed to request an appeal until March 19, 2003. Following two hearings to consider the timeliness of the appeal, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that claimant failed to comply with the 20-day filing requirement of Labor Law § 621 (1) and dismissed the appeal.

We affirm. Given the evidence in the record and claimant’s failure to submit any evidence substantiating his claim that he filed an appeal within the statutory period, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision dismissing the appeal as untimely *(see Matter of Kilgore [Legal Duplicating Servs.—Commissioner of Labor]*251 AD2d 731 [1998]). The underlying merits of the denial of claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits are, therefore, not properly before this Court *(see Matter of Hungerford [Sams Club/Walmart—Commissioner of Labor],*273 AD2d 680, 681 [2000]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### John Patrick DONOHUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lt. J. D. LAMBERT; Lt. McCowan; Lt. Payne; Lt. C. C. Gilbert; Sgt. C. Deel; C/O S. T. White; C/O McCurdy; Lt. B. Franklin; T. Carroll; C/O Phillip P. Mullins, Defendants-Appellees, and Lt. Blevens; Warden Randall C. Mathena; C/O Beverly; Unit Manager W. Swiney; Officer Adams; Major Gallihar; K. Brinkley; Sgt. D. Barton; M. *241Younce; J. Diets; L. Mullins; M. Counts; Vitatoe; Powers; L. R. Collins; S. L. Day; R. D. Gibson; D. A. Still; Quillen; Johnson; Walker; Ingle; T. McCoy; T. Raiford; John Doe; V. Gray; P. White; E. Rodriquez; D. Saunders; Harris Diggs; Cauchrin; E. Miller; John Does; G. K. Washington; C/O C. E. Rose, Defendants.

No. 16-6628

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 31, 2017

Decided: September 26, 2017

John Patrick Donohue, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Keuling-Stout, KEULING-STOUT, PC, Big Stone Gap, Virginia; Timothy Worth McAfee, TIMOTHY W. MCAFEE, PLLC, Big Stone Gap, Virginia; Gregory Michael Stewart, STEWART LAW OFFICE, PC, Norton, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Patrick Donohue appeals the district court’s order denying his posttrial motions for judgment as a matter of law, for a new trial, and to appoint counsel. We previously granted Donohue’s motion for a transcript of his trial. We review Dono-hue’s motion for judgment as a matter of law de novo. *Russell v. Absolute Collection Servs., Inc.,*763 F.3d 385, 391 (4th Cir. 2014). We review his motions for a new trial and to appoint counsel for abuse of discretion. *Gentry v. E. W. Partners Club Mgmt. Co.,*816 F.3d 228, 241 (4th Cir. 2016); *Miller v. Simmons,*814 F.2d 962, 966 (4th Cir. 1987). We have reviewed the present record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Donohue v. Lambert,*No. 7:13-cv-00397-GEC-PMS (W.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.28


IDACORP, Inc. and/or Idaho Power Company Executive Officers 
with Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreements
(as of February 19, 2019) 


	
					
	Name
	 
	Title
	 
	Date of Agreement

	Darrel T. Anderson
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/23/2008

	Brian R. Buckham*
	 
	Senior Vice President and General Counsel of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	4/4/2016

	Jeff Glenn*
	 
	Vice President of Corporate Services and Chief Information Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	2/4/2016

	Lisa A. Grow
	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/12/2008

	Steven R. Keen
	 
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/30/2008

	Jeffrey L. Malmen
	 
	Senior Vice President of Public Affairs of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	12/8/2008

	Tessia Park*
	 
	Vice President of Power Supply of Idaho Power Company
	 
	1/5/2016

	Kenneth W. Petersen*
	 
	Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company
	 
	5/20/2010

	N. Vern Porter*
	 
	Vice President of Transmission & Distribution Engineering and Construction and Chief Safety Officer of Idaho Power Company
	 
	3/18/2010

	Adam Richins*
	 
	Vice President of Customer Operations and Business Development of Idaho Power Company
	 
	2/8/2017




*Change in control agreement does not include 13th-month trigger or tax gross-up provisions.
William DOANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1592

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy's Subcommittee on Technology, Innovation and Partnerships hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Friday, February 11, 2022, from 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EST.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda is: Subcommittee Chair's Opening Remarks; Approval of Minutes from November 22, 2021, Meeting; Update on Regional Innovation Engines and TIP Programmatic Plans Beyond the Regional Innovation Engines.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov,*                         703/292-7000. Meeting information and updates may be found at                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb.*

Chris Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2022-02776 Filed 2-7-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stuart A. Tashlik,  as Chief Financial  Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the
"Company")  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the  accompanying  Form 10-Q report for the period  ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report")  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003
                                        /s/ Stuart A. Tashlik
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Stuart A. Tashlik,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit
10.15
 CONFIDENTIAL SEPARATION AGREEMENT  AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS
  ,
  $65,000.00, $195,000.00
 $7,500.00
 $5,000.00
 $1,508.16
  1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



However, the Company does not
guarantee any particular tax effect for payments made to Employee under this Agreement.
  4




---



##### 



EMPLOYEE UNDERSTANDS THAT HE SHOULD CONSULT WITH AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT
AND THAT HE IS GIVING UP ANY LEGAL CLAIMS HE HAS AGAINST THE PARTIES RELEASED ABOVE BY SIGNING THIS
AGREEMENT. EMPLOYEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE IS SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY AND
VOLUNTARILY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE BENEFITS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 3.
 /s/ Rudy M. MuiRudy M. MuiRAE SYSTEMS INC.By: /s/ Randall
GausmanDated: March 4, 2008
    
    Name: Randall GausmanTitle: Chief Financial Officer
 5
Andrew A. CLEGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1213

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Samuel E. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-6372

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Samuel E. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel E. Harris appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice the court’s dismissal without prejudice of his Federal Tort Claims Act action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Harris v. U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs,*No. 3:16-cv-00158-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EX PARTE Stephen P. ST. CLAIR

1150983

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Laquetta HUGHES Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-1758

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 5, 2017

Filed: October 11, 2017

Martin Joseph McLaughlin, Lisa C. Williams, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Jacob Alden Schunk, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Laquetta Hughes, Pro Se

Heather Quick, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Laquetta Hughes directly appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after she pled guilty to a firearm charge. Her counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Hughes has filed a pro se brief, also arguing that her sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); ■see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (on appeal, within-Guidelines-range sentence may be presumed reasonable). In addition, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, and counsel is granted leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District oflowa.
EX PARTE Matthew Sherman PHILLIPS

CR-16-0544

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
EX PARTE Daniel STENNIS

1160377 (CR-15-1111)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                   JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     DEC-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                            1
<CASH>                                                                36,992
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         50,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           2,404
<INVENTORY>                                                           49,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     148,471
<PP&E>                                                                39,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        19,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       242,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 29,781
<BONDS>                                                               92,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                                 143
<OTHER-SE>                                                           120,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         242,478
<SALES>                                                               86,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      86,222
<CGS>                                                                 59,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         59,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      22,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     2,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        1,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            (588)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      959
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0.14
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chronimed Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 26, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory H. Keane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                             /s/ Gregory H. Keane
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Gregory H. Keane
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             February 5, 2004