alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


               In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), of 3CI Complete Compliance Corporation (the
"Company"), I, Otley L. Smith III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify as follows, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Otley L. Smith III
-------------------------------------
Otley L. Smith III
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 24, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0000883573
<NAME>                             F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series VIII
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              2,212,931
<SECURITIES>                        6,708,087
<RECEIVABLES>                         251,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    9,172,170
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      9,172,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 386,815
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                          8,785,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        9,172,170
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      808,900
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      219,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       589,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          589,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           24.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
Kenny Denard BLACKMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4667

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 11, 2018.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Immunometabolism and Aging.
    Date: February 23, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cdaba4bfb9a5a6a08da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2c4cbd0d6cac9cfe2cfc3cbce8ccccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 7, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02918 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SIERRA INVESTMENTS GROUP, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Gonzalo Ortiz GAY and Ralph Paul Smith, Jr., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1544

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
CONSENT FOR USE OF SIMILAR NAME


     On  the  ____  day  of  __________, 1999, the Board of Directors of Systems
Atlanta  Commercial  Systems,  Inc.  a Georgia corporation, passed the following
resolution:

     RESOLVED,  that  Systems Atlanta Commercial Systems, Inc. gives its consent
     to Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the use of
     the  name  Systems  Atlanta  Commercial  Systems,  Inc.

                                   SYSTEMS  ATLANTA  COMMERCIAL  SYSTEMS,  INC.


                                   By:  __________________________________
                                        B. Scott  Dobson,  Vice-President


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                           10.04
                                  September 25, 1997


Paul Edelhertz

Hand-delivered


Dear Paul,

In the event your employment is terminated without cause, Racotek will provide
you with six (6) months advance notice of your termination, or otherwise provide
you with compensation equivalent to six (6) months of pay at your
then-prevailing salary.  Please sign below to indicate your receipt and
acknowledgement of this letter.

Very truly yours,


Mike Fabiaschi

Mike Fabiaschi
President & C.E.O.


ACCEPTED THIS 29th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997:

                                            Paul Edelhertz
                                            --------------------
                                            Paul Edelhertz




                                          17
SOLIS INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1053

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

DECEMBER 14, 2017

ORDERED that appellant's notice of voluntary dismissal of appeal is recognized by the Court, and this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is hereby dismissed.

FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41316

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL GONZALEZ-CANTU,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-852

--------------------

Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raul GonzalezCantu (Gonzalez) preserves for further review his contention that

his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker**

rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing

Guideline regime condemned in Booker. Gonzalez concedes that his

argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511

(5th Cir. 2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this

court’s methodology for reviewing sentences for reasonableness. 
No. 06-41316

-2-

In light of Rita v. United States, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2007 WL

1772146 at *6-11 (2007), the issue remains foreclosed. Gonzalez

also raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32(1)**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the quarterly report of RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 26, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip J. Hickey, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: August 5, 2005 | /s/ Philip J. Hickey, Jr. |  
 
Philip J. Hickey, Jr.

 
 
Chief Executive Officer

  |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Sinclair DAVIS, DC# R70885, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3266

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 25, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION

                  Catalina Marketing Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of
Delaware, certifies that:

                  FIRST: The Corporation's Board of Directors and stockholders
have adopted resolutions authorizing the following amendment to the
Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation as follows:

                  1.       The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
is hereby amended by deleting paragraph A of Article Fourth in its entirety and
restating said paragraph in its entirety as follows:

                  "A.      The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of
shares designated "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock," respectively. The number
of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is 150,000,000, par value $.01
per share, and the number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued
is 5,000,000, par value $.01 per share.

                  SECOND: The foregoing amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Catalina Marketing Corporation has caused
this Certificate to be signed and attested by its duly authorized officer this
24th day of July, 2000.

                           CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION


                           By:/s/ Barry Brooks
                              -------------------------------------
                              Barry Brooks
                              Secretary
Jeffrey JUBENVILLE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2016

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 08, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | April      30, 2010 |                                                         By: | /s/      Clifton R. Beckham                |   |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | Clifton      R. Beckham                    |   |
|   |                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chronimed Inc (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 27, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory H. Keane,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:


         1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

February 6, 2003

                                              /s/ GREGORY H. KEANE
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Gregory H. Keane
                                              Chief Financial Officer
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 10711 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:09

- cr - 00486

- SCB

- EAJ

- 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus WALDIR FORBES

- SUAREZ, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ ( January 27, 2014 )

Before HULL, MARCUS , and EDMONDSON , Circuit Judg es.

PER CURIAM: Waldir Forbes

- Suarez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine while aboard a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. He

Case: 13-10711 Date Filed: 01/27/2014 Page: 1 of 22 contends that the district court plainly erred by failing to dismiss hi s indic tment because t he Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (“MDLEA”) is unconstitutional as applied to his conduct. He points to United States v. Bellaizac

- Hurtado , 700 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir. 2012); then, he argues that the phrase “through international waters” se t forth in his plea agreement does not mean (and thus does not admit) that his boats actually left territorial waters. Forbes

- Suarez waived the right t o raise his present challenge to his conviction by entering an unconditional guilty plea. See United States v. Ternus , 598 F.3d 1251, 1254 (11th Cir. 2010); United States v. Yunis , 723 F.2d 795, 796 (11th Cir. 1984 ) . In addition, no decision of this C ourt or the Supreme Court supports Forbes

- Suarez’s contention that his admitting the vessels in hi s conspiracy used “international waters” fails to include inherently a concession that the vessels went outside of “territorial waters.” In a case like this one, “international waters” has a customary meaning and is not ambiguous. For MDLEA proceedings, territorial waters ≠ international waters, at least in the absence of binding precedent saying something else. Therefore, the district court did not commit plain error by failing to dismiss his indictment sua sponte
. AFFIRMED. Case: 13-10711 Date Filed: 01/27/2014 Page: 2 of 2
7 / 26 /2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Vision Pictures , LLC Exemption #11541 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA

2015

- 0423

Dear Sir or Madam:

Vision Pictures LLC hereby requests an amendment to e xemption #11541 to allow for one ( 1 )

additional type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the

Petition for Exemption

.

Vision Pictures wishes to operate the Freefly Alta under the same terms and conditions

contained in e xemption #11541 . Attached hereto, and submitted as highly proprietary and

confidential documents , are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM) for ( 1 )

additional UAS. All operations of the addit ional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of

e xemption #11541

.

As this is an amendment to an existing e xemption asking for only the addition of other type s

of unmanned aerial vehicle s

, Vision Pictures respectfully submits that good cause exists so that

notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for an

amendment to e xemption #11541

.

Sincerely yours,

Joel S Petersen

Vision Pictures LLC

2828 West Clark Ave, Burbank CA 91505

(323) 484

- 4022



### cc:

Jonathan B. Rupprecht, Esq.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwight Leander SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-7350

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: August 2, 2017

Dwight Leander Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Acting United States Attorney, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Leander Solomon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying.relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. On appeal, Solomon challenges only the validity of his sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012).

To assist in our resolution of Solomon’s request for a certificate of appealability, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012), we directed the Government to file a response addressing the impact, if any, of *Mathis v. United States,*— U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), on the continuing viability of Solomon’s North Carolina breaking and entering conviction as an ACCA predicate violent felony. In response, the Government has moved to remand the case to the district court. The Government concedes that Solomon’s ACCA enhancement is no longer valid, regardless of the status of his breaking and entering conviction, because a different predicate offense—a North Carolina conviction for possession with intent to sell cocaine—no longer qualifies as an ACCA predicate under *United States v. Newbold,*791 F.3d 455, 463-64 (4th Cir. 2015).

In light of the Government’s concession and our independent review of the record, we grant a certificate of appealability, vacate the district court’s order denying § 2255 relief, and grant the Government’s motion to rescind the briefing order and to remand. We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*187We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*VACATED AND REMANDED*