alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NETTAXI.COM

Online  Advertising  Insertion  Order
Contact:  Dave  Schlenz
Phone: 408-879-9880  x106  Fax: 408-879-9907
dws@nettaxi.com
---------------

Insertion Order / PO # Verbal - Dave                          Date:  04-03-2000

To  the  Creator  of:                    NETTAXI.COM

Please place the advertising of:         HEARME.COM

Package/Rotation/IMP:                    RUN  OF  SITE  (468X60)
                                         RUN  OF  SITE  (120X60)

FLIGHT  DATES:                           04-03/06  30

TOTAL  IMPRESSIONS:                      13,166,667  Million
                                         3  Million  (APR  468x60)
                                         1,388,889  Million  (APR  120x60)
                                         3  Million  (MAY  468x60)
                                         1,388,889  Million  (MAY  120x60)
                                         3  Million  (JUN  468x60)
                                         1,388,889  Million  (JUN  120x60)

GROSS  RATE:                             $25.00  CPM  468
                                         $18.00  CPM  120x60

TOTAL  ORDER:                            $300,000.00  -  BARTER
                                               $225,000  468x60
                                               $75,000   120x60

CREATIVE  SIZE:                          468x60  Banner/120x60  Button

MATERIAL  INSTRUCTIONS:                  Send all creative to dws@nettaxi.com
                                                              ---------------

BILLING  INSTRUCTIONS:                   Please  send  invoice  to:

                                         HEARME.COM
                                         c/o  Jeremy  Raymer
                                         655  Clyde  Ave.
                                         Mountain  View,  CA  94043

                                         650-429-3696
                                         650-429-3911
                                         e-mail  -  Jeremy@mplayer.com
                                                    ------------------

Nettaxi  Representative:                 Dave  Schlenz              Date:
                                         -----------------               -------

Advertiser Authorized Signature:         /s/Jeremy Raymer           Date: 4-6-00
                                         -----------------               -------


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1231 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1231

      To prohibit the reentry of the United States into the Joint 
    Comprehensive Plan of Action unless the President makes certain 
        certifications relating to Iran, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2021

  Mr. Tony Gonzales of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the reentry of the United States into the Joint 
    Comprehensive Plan of Action unless the President makes certain 
        certifications relating to Iran, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Constraining Human Rights Offenders 
in the Middle East Act'' or the ``CHROME Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REENTRY INTO THE JCPOA.

    The President may not take any action relating to the re-entry of 
the United States into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action signed at 
Vienna on July 14, 2015, by Iran and by France, Germany, the Russian 
Federation, the People's Republic of China, the United Kingdom, and the 
United States (including all implementing materials and agreements 
related to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), unless the 
President certifies to Congress each of the following:
            (1) No waiver or suspension of a sanction waived or 
        suspended pursuant to such re-entry will operate to the 
        benefit, directly or indirectly, of any organization or any 
        member of an organization designated as a foreign terrorist 
        organization under section 219 of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
            (2) No waiver or suspension of a sanction waived or 
        suspended pursuant to such re-entry will operate to the 
        benefit, directly or indirectly, of any individual or entity of 
        the Government of Iran that has engaged in the gross violation 
        of human rights, such as the commission of torture, the killing 
        of peaceful protestors, or the persecution of homosexual 
        persons.
                                 <all>
```
IN the INTEREST OF E.L.F. and N.S.F., children.

N.F., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Case No. 2D18-418

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018

Patrick R. Cunningham, Bradenton, for Appellant.

Stephanie C. Zimmerman of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton; and Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Christine B. Gardner of Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach; and Thomasina Moore and Laura J. Lee of Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
STATE EX REL. Cowan COLLINS v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0349

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 27, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ASCENSION**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, relator's *566sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3 ; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State* , 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



J. Donald Boggus, Jr.J. Donald Boggus, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer November 10, 2005
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

____________________________________________________________________________________

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Truck, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Clifton R. Beckham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  | August 1, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Clifton R. Beckham                    |   |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |           |   | **Clifton R. Beckham**                    |   |
|   | * *       |   | *President and Chief Executive Officer*** |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to USA Truck, Inc. and will be retained by USA Truck, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BELL SPORTS CORP.
                           EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE:
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                                                       Three months ended
                                                --------------------------------
                                                 September 27,    September 28,
                                                     1997             1996
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                 
Net income                                          $   637          $     3
                                                                 
Net effect of convertible subordinated                           
debentures (using the if-converted method)              607              566
                                                                 
                                                    ------------------------
                                                                 
Adjusted net income                                 $ 1,244          $   569
                                                    ========================
                                                                 
Weighted average number of common                                
and common equivalent shares                                     
outstanding - primary                                14,075           13,754
                                                                 
Net effect of other potentially dilutive                         
securities                                              249      
                                                                 
Additional shares assuming conversion of                         
convertible subordinated debentures                   1,595            1,595
                                                    ------------------------
                                                                 
Adjusted average shares outstanding for                          
fully diluted computation                            15,919           15,349
                                                    ========================
                                                                 
Per share amount - fully diluted                    $  0.08          $  0.04
                                                    ========================
EX PARTE Eric J. CHAMBERLIN

1160215 (2150447)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mick Chi CAWSTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30259

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 2, 2017

James A. Goeke, Alison L. Gregoire, ' DOJ—United States Attorney’s Office, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee,.

Matthew Campbell, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDWA—Federal Public Defender’s Office (Eastern WA & ID), Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH» Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mick Chi Cawston appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault resulting in substantial bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(7) and 1153. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

For the first time on appeal, Cawston argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to sufficiently explain the sentence. We review for plain error, *see United States v. Valencia-Barragan,*608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the district court considered Cawston’s sentencing arguments and adequately explained its reasons for selecting an 18-month term, including the need to protect the public and to afford deterrence. *See United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Cawston also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district *338court did not abuse its discretion. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The district court varied downward from the correctly calculated guideline range in order to account for the mitigating circumstances in Cawston’s case. This decision reflects that, contrary to Cawston’s argument, the court did not place undue weight on the guidelines range in selecting the sentence. Moreover, the sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the seriousness of the offense and Cawston’s multiple pretrial release violations. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1080

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's two notices of inquiry received on April 20, 2018, and on April 23, 2018, are treated as a response to the order to show cause, dated April 11, 2018, concerning the timeliness of the notice of appeal. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after rendition of the orders asserted by appellant as being appealed and is, therefore, untimely. Appellant's motion for clarification of sentence is dismissed as moot.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBRANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CompuPrint, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Roman
Rozenberg, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Roman Rozenberg
-----------------------
Roman Rozenberg
Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 22, 2005
#### Carlos Alberto GARAY-GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-70362

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 14, 2017

*242Carlos Alberto Garay-Guzman, Pro Se

Aric Allan Anderson, Trial Attorney, OIL, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Carlos Alberto Garay-Guzman, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.

We do not consider new factual claims referenced in Garay-Guzman’s opening brief. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (this court’s review is limited to the administrative record).

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that, even if credible, the past harm Garay-Guzman suffered did not rise to the level of persecution. *See Lim v. INS,*224 F.3d 929, 936-37 (2000) (unfulfilled threats generally do not constitute past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Garay-Guzman failed to establish a clear probability of future persecution. *See Tamang v. Holder,*598 F.3d 1083, 1095 (9th Cir. 2010) (evidence did not compel a finding of a clear probability of future persecution to qualify for withholding of removal). Thus, Garay-Guz-man’s withholding of removal claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 3:49 PM

To: 'josh@allieddrones.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Albuquerque, Paul (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Info rmation - Allied Drones

Dear Mr. Kornoff:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0804). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• A safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 5, Section 3, Paragraph

16

‐ 5

‐ 3

‐ 7I. The required components of a safety case and safety case format may be found in Order 8900.1, Volume 16,

Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16

‐ 7

‐ 1

‐ 3. is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us

to proceed without this safety case and remove nighttime operations from your proposed operation please inform of us

of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by May 25, 2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
EX PARTE R.D.S.

CR-16-0657

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
#### Torian GAITHER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David ZOOK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6690

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 14, 2017

Decided: October 25, 2017

Torian Gaither, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kiernan Fitzgerald, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Torian Gaither seeks to appeal the district court’s second order accepting the amended recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Gaither’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling *262is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gaither has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Anthony Jeff WOOD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2922

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 25, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal of the summary denial of petitioner's postconviction motion in the trial court is granted in circuit court case number CF12-2833-XX for review of the trial court's order of December 6, 2016.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time. The summary record shall be transmitted to this court when the certified copy of this order is returned by the trial court clerk.

After a new appellate case number is assigned and an acknowledgment letter has issued, this court will issue an order advising the appellant of the due date of the optional initial brief.

CASANUEVA, WALLACE, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.