T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n r e : W I LLI A M P. BEN D ER, D ebt or. W I LLI A M P. BEN D ER, A p p e lla n t, v. D IA N E M . M A N N , C hapt er7 T rust ee ; T H E W A R R E N A N D R O S A L IE GU M M OW TR UST, A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 60006 B A P N o. 10- 1121 ME MOR AN DU M *

I n r e : W I LLI A M P. BEN D ER, D ebt or. CO N G REJ O I N V ESTM EN TS, LLC, A p p e lla n t, N o. 11- 60007 B A P N o. 10- 1122 

# FI LED MA Y08 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s tha tthi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f or ** d e c is io n w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 2 v. D IA N E M . M A N N , C hapt er7 T rust ee , A pp el l ee . A p p e a ls f r o m th e N in th C ir c u it B ankrup t cyA pp el l at e P anel P appa s , J ury , a nd B aue r , B a nkrupt c yJ udge s , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2012 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I In N o. 11 -600 07 , C on grej o Inv es tm ent s, L L C chal l enges the bank rupt cy c o u rt’s o r d e ra v o id in g th e tr a n s f e ro f p r o p e rtyf

r o m W illia m P . B e n d e r , D e b to r , to C ongr e j o. T he T rus t e e f

i l e d am ot i on t o di s m i s s thi s appe a l a s m ootbe c aus e the p r o p e rtya t is s u e h a s n o w b e e n s o ldto ap u r c h a s e rin g o o df a ith . W e de nythe m ot i on t o di s m i s s . T hough the s a l e of the pr ope rtyc a nnotbe u n d o n e b e c au s e n o s ta yo r d e rw a s s o u g h t, se e 1 1 U .S .C . § 3 6 3 ( m ) , r e lie f c o u lds till b e a w a r d e d in th e f

o rm o f d a m a g e s , s e e, e . g. , In re B erg , 4 5 B. R. 8 9 9 , 9 0 2 ( B. A . P.3

9 th C ir . 1 9 8 4 ) , a s s u m in g th a t th e e s ta te c o n ta in s a d d itio n a l p r o p e rty , see In re Fi l ter corp, Inc. , 16 3 F . 3d 57 0, 57 7– 78 (9th C i r. 19 98 ). O n the m e r i t s , the ba nkrupt c yc ourtpr ope r l yappl i e d e qui t abl e t ol l i ng t o the T ru s te e ’s a v o id a n c e a c tio n . T h e c o u rt f o u n dth a t B e n d e ra c tiv e lyc o n c e a le dh is i nt e r e s ti n a nd c onve y a nc e of the pr ope rty , tha tthe T rus t e e di d notdi s c ove rthe conv ey ance un t i l fi ve m on ths af t erthe deed w as exec ut ed, and thatthe T rust ee di l i ge nt l yi nve s t i ga t e d the e s t a t e ’ s pos s i bl e c l a i m t o the pr ope rty . T he s e f i ndi ngs a r e s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d a n d a r e n o t c le a r lye rr o n e o u s . A p p ly in g e q u itab le to llin g in th e s e c ir c u m s ta n c e s is p r o p e r . Se e, e . g. , In re O l se n , 3 6 F .3 d7 1 , 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) . T o llin g r e s c u e s th e T ru s te e ’s o th e rw is e tim e - b a rr e dc la im , se e Soc opG on zalez v . I

NS , 272 F . 3d 1176, 1193–95 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( e n banc ) , a nd the a voi da nc e or de rm us tbe a f f i rm e d. II I n N o . 1 1 - 6 0 0 0 6 , B e n d e rap p e a ls th e b a n k ru p tc yc o u rt’s o r d e ro v e rru lin g h is o b j ect i o n t o th e W i l l i am an d R o sal i e G u m m o w T ru st ’ s p ro o f o f cl ai m . B ecau se B ender pres ent s thi s app ea l as cont i ng enton the re vers al of the avoi dance order, w h ic h w e in s te a d a f

f irm , w e g r a n t th e m o tio n to d is m is s th is ap p e a l a s m o o t. See Chur c h of

Sc i e ntology v. U

ni ted States , 5 0 6 U .S . 9 , 1 2 ( 1 9 9 2 ) . N o . 1 1 -6 0 0 0 7 i s A FFI R M ED an dN o . 1 1 -6 0 0 0 6 i s D I SM I SSED .