alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                    7,535
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            56,065
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        105,334
<PP&E>                                  236,122
<DEPRECIATION>                          132,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          270,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   122,521
<BONDS>                                   1,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                    182
<OTHER-SE>                              137,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            270,369
<SALES>                                 257,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        257,232
<CGS>                                   104,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           196,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            241
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          60,946
<INCOME-TAX>                             24,501
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      36,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             36,935
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.91


</TABLE>
Diana ERNEST, Appellant, v. SUNCOAST SCHOOLS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3934

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

David A. Fernandez of Florida Trial Counsel, Bradenton, for Appellant.

Theodore J. Hamilton and Thomas K. Sciarrino, Jr., of Wetherington Hamilton, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

KPMG  LLP
Chartered  Accountants
Box  10426  777  Dunsmuir  Street
Vancouver,  BC  V7Y  1K3
Canada

CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS

The  Board  of  Directors
Genesis  Bioventures,  Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (no.
333-100606,  333-100267  and 333-81130) on Form S-B of Genesis Bioventures, Inc.
of  our  report  dated  April  4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets  of  Genesis  Bioventures,  Inc  as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the
related  consolidated  statements  of  operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows  for  the  years  ended  December 31, 2002 and 2001 and cumulative for the
period  from  September  19, 1994 (inception) to December 31, 2002, which report
appears  in  the  December  31,  2002  annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Genesis
Bioventures,  Inc.

Our  report  dated  April  4, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash
flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as  a  going  concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of  this  uncertainty.

/s/  Chartered  Accountants
--------------------------------
KPMG  LLP
Vancouver,  Canada
April  17,  2003


                                     E - 74
<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11373 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CESAR ALVARADO-MANCILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04-CR-41-ALL-C

-------------------- Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cesar AlvaradoMancilla raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
A.S., Mother of J.S., a Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3781

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certificate Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Christopher W. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Christopher W. Wolf  
 30
**Exhibit 27**

**Consent of Glen Cole, P.Geo**

** **

Iconsent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technicalreport entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report FeasibilityStudy of the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada dated February 14, 2014”, included in the Annual Information Form of NewGold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such informationin the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333- 160500) of New Gold Inc.

  

Datedthis 27th day of March, 2015

 

 

*/s/Glen Cole *

Name:Glen Cole, P.Geo

Title:	PrincipalConsultant (Resource Geology)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION





I, Blake M. Edwards, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grayson Bankshares, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 16, 2005

/s/ Blake M. Edwards

Blake M. Edwards

Chief Financial Officer
Maria Del Socorro Corona FLORES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4536

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed for failure of appellant to comply with this court's order of April 10, 2018, requiring the filing of an initial brief.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6035 

To criminalize stalking using an unauthorized geotracking device. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Mrs. SYKES introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To criminalize stalking using an unauthorized geotracking 

device. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Electronic Stalk5 ing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STALKING PENALTY. 

7 Section 2261A of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Whoever’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) 

10 IN GENERAL.—Whoever’’; 

2 

•HR 6035 IH

1 (2) by inserting after ‘‘uses the mail,’’ the fol2 lowing: ‘‘uses an unauthorized geotracking device’’; 

3 and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 ‘‘(1) The term ‘geotracking device’ means an 

7 electronic or mechanical device that permits a person 

8 to remotely determine or track the position and 

9 movement of another person. 

10 ‘‘(2) The term ‘unauthorized’ means, with re11 spect to a geotracking device, that the person on 

12 whom the geotracking device is being used has not 

13 consented to such use or otherwise revoked consent 

14 to such use.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,410,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                   597,861
<INVENTORY>                                     88,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,618,869
<PP&E>                                      12,586,119
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,600,229
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,174,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,597,115
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     77,500
<COMMON>                                        92,329
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,524,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,174,170
<SALES>                                     14,127,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,127,077
<CGS>                                       10,474,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,474,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,715,377
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             459,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1 Compensation Agreement dated February 25, 2019 between Oroplata Resources, Inc. and Jeffrey Maller


 

Exhibit 10.1

 

COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

 

This Compensation Agreement is made to be effective from February 25, 2019 by and between Jeffrey Maller (“Consultant”) and Oroplata Resources, Inc. (the “Company") (together, Consultant and the Company are each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties"), who agree as follows:

 

1.Compensation. In compensation for legal services rendered to the Company for the calendar year ending December 31, 2019, the Company agrees to issue Consultant the sum of one million (1,000,000) shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Compensation Shares”). 

 

2.Registration. As soon as reasonably practicable after the full execution of this Agreement, the Company intends to file a Registration Statements on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission registering the Compensation Shares to permit the public sale by the Consultant. 

 

3.Restricted Services. The Parties agree that none of the services previously provided or to be provided in exchange for the Compensation Shares are in connection with any capital raising transaction or with directly or indirectly promoting or maintaining a market for the securities of the Company. To the extent that Consultant has or will provide any of such services, he shall be compensated from other sources other than the Compensation Shares.  

 

4.Board Approval. This Agreement was approved by the Board of Consultants of Oroplata Resources, Inc., on February 25, 2019 

 

5.Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be constructed and interpreted in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Nevada. The parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the Federal and State Courts in Washoe County, Nevada for the resolution of all legal disputes arising under the terms of this Agreement. 

 

6.Severability. Should any provision of this Agreement be declared or determined to be invalid or illegal, the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby, and the illegal or invalid part, term or provision shall be deemed not to be a part of this Agreement. 

 

7.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Compensation Agreement to be duly executed by each Party’s authorized officer as of the Effective Date.

 

	“COMPANY”

	“CONSULTANT”:


	Oroplata Resources, Inc.,

a Nevada corporation

 

By: /s/ Douglas Cole 

Name:Douglas Cole 

Title:Chief Executive Officer 

	 

 

 

By: /s/ Jeffrey Maller 

Name: Jeffrey Maller
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6056 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed 

Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on athome child care programs of the Department of Defense, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Ms. LEE of Nevada (for herself, Mr. BACON, and Mr. MOYLAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 

Representatives a report on at-home child care programs 

of the Department of Defense, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘More Child Care and 

5 Jobs for Military Families Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6056 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON AT-HOME CHILD CARE PROGRAMS OF 

2 THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; FEASIBILITY 

3 STUDY. 

4 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 39 months after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

6 shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

7 House of Representatives and the Senate a report on at8 home child care programs offered by each military depart9 ment. Such report shall include— 

10 (1) an identification of the number of such at11 home child care programs that have opened, closed, 

12 or relocated during the period beginning on the date 

13 of enactment of this Act and ending on the date that 

14 this three years after such date; 

15 (2) a summary of difficulties, if any, experi16 enced by military spouses employed at such at-home 

17 child care programs with respect to— 

18 (A) obtaining necessary certifications or 

19 licences; and 

20 (B) opening, closing, or relocating such an 

21 at-home child care program; and 

22 (3) a summary of effects, if any, that the open23 ing, closing, or relocation of such an at-home child 

24 care program has on the employment rate of mili25 tary spouses residing in geographic proximity to 

26 such at-home child care program. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 6056 IH

1 (b) FEASIBILITY STUDY.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 

3 shall conduct a feasibility study on— 

4 (A) standardizing the requirements of each 

5 military department relating to licensing and 

6 certification for at-home child care providers; 

7 (B) removing barriers, if any, to the ex8 pansion of at-home child care programs de9 scribed in subsection (a); and 

10 (C) supporting the employment of military 

11 spouses in such at-home child care programs. 

12 (2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 

13 days after the date of the submission of the report 

14 under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall 

15 submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the 

16 House of Representatives and the Senate a report 

17 that includes the findings of such feasibility study. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**Officer Certification** Exhibit 31.2
I, Christopher W. Wolf, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Catalina MarketingCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004     By:   /s/ Christopher W. Wolf     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
38
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darryl Jarod MAGWOOD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6812

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 17, 2017

Decided: October 25, 2017

Darryl Jarod Magwood, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Katherine Barr Daly, Assistant United States Attorney, Scott Butler Nussbum, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Jarod Magwood appeals the criminal judgment entered against him on January 11, 2013. Magwood previously appealed this judgment, and we affirmed. *United States v. Magwood,*528 Fed.Appx. 331 (4th Cir. 2013). In light of the previous proceeding in this case, we dismiss this appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of ReGen Biologics, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2009 (the “Report”).
The undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 11, 2009





/s/ Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D.Name:
Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., Ph.D.Title:
President and Chief Executive Officer