### 34217 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,

44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Bombardier Aerospace Model BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 (CSeries) airplanes.

Limit Engine Torque Loads

In lieu of § 25.361(b) the following special conditions apply:

1. For turbine engine installations, the engine mounts, pylons, and adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to withstand 1g level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum limit torque loads imposed by each of the following:

(a) Sudden engine deceleration due to
a malfunction that could result in a temporary loss of power or thrust, and

(b) The maximum acceleration of the engine.

2. For auxiliary power unit (APU) installations, the power unit mounts and adjacent supporting airframe structure must be designed to withstand 1g level flight loads acting simultaneously with the maximum limit torque loads imposed by each of the following:

(a) Sudden APU deceleration due to malfunction or structural failure; and

(b) The maximum acceleration of the

APU.

3. For engine supporting structure, an ultimate loading condition must be considered that combines 1g flight loads with the transient dynamic loads resulting from:

(a) The loss of any fan, compressor, or turbine blade; and separately

(b) Where applicable to a specific engine design, any other engine structural failure that results in higher
loads.

4. The ultimate loads developed from the conditions specified in paragraphs 3(a) and 3(b) of these special conditions are to be multiplied by a factor of 1.0 when applied to engine mounts and pylons, and multiplied by a factor of 1.25 when applied to adjacent supporting airframe structure.

5. Any permanent deformation that results from the conditions specified in paragraph 3 must not prevent continued safe flight and landing.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 6,

2014. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2014–13923 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2013–0986; Airspace Docket No. 13–AGL–25]** 

**Establishment of Class E Airspace; Bois Blanc Island, MI** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Final rule, correction.

**SUMMARY :**  This action corrects an error in the legal description of a final rule published in the Federal Register of May 22, 2014, that establishes Class E airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc Island, MI. The legal description noted incorrectly the airport’s state and geographic
coordinates.

**DATES :**  Effective date: 0901 UTC, July

24, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321–

7654.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
History

On May 22, 2014, a final rule was published in the Federal Register establishing Class E airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc Island, MI (79 FR 29323), Docket No. FAA– 2013–0986. Subsequent to publication, the FAA found the document showing the wrong state and geographic location in the legal description. It should read Bois Blanc Island Airport, MI, (lat.

45 ° 45 ′59′′ N., long. 084 ° 30′ 14′′ W.), instead of Bois Blanc Island Airport, MO, (lat. 38 ° 20′52 ′′ N., long. 93 ° 20′43 ′′ W.) This action makes the correction.

Final Rule Correction

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the Federal Register of May 22, 2014, (79 FR 29323) FR Doc. 2014–11382, the state and geographic coordinates in the airspace designation regulatory text on page 29324, column 2, line 1, are
corrected as follows:

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

AGL MI E5 Bois Blanc Island, MI [Corrected]

■ Remove Bois Blanc Island Airport, MO, (lat. 38 ° 20′52 ′′ N., long. 93 ° 20′43 ′′ W.) and add in its place Bois Blanc Island Airport, MI, (lat. 45 ° 45 ′59′′ N., long. 084 ° 30′ 14′′ W.)

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 6,

2014. Christopher L. Southerland,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.

[FR Doc. 2014–14049 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Parts 744 and 758**

**[Docket No. 140530464–4464–01]**

**RIN 0694–AG20**

**Export Administration Regulations (EAR): Addition of Certain Persons to**  **the Unverified List (UVL) and Making a**
**Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding twenty-nine (29) persons to the Unverified List (the ‘‘Unverified List’’ or UVL). The 29 persons are being added
to the UVL on the basis that BIS could not verify their bona fides because an end-use check could not be completed satisfactorily for reasons outside the U.S. Government’s control. In addition, this rule reinserts a requirement for exporters to file an Automated Export System (AES) record for all exports subject to the EAR involving persons listed on the UVL following that provision’s inadvertent removal from
the EAR.

The UVL contains the names and addresses of foreign persons who are or have been parties to a transaction, as that term is described in the EAR, involving the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) of items subject to the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS hasbeen unable to verify through an enduse check. There is a suspension of license exceptions for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving a party or parties to the transaction who are listed on the UVL, and a requirement for exporters, reexporters, and transferors to obtain (and keep a record of) a UVL statement from a party or parties to the transaction
who are listed on the UVL before proceeding with exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving items subject to the EAR, but where the item does not require a license.


### 34218 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This rule is effective: June 16, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kevin Kurland, Director, Office of Enforcement Analysis, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482–4255 or by
email at UVLRequest@bis.doc.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Background

On August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49311), BIS expanded the scope of reasons to add persons to the Entity List (Supplement No. 4 Part 744). That rule
amended Section 744.11 of the EAR to provide illustrative examples of the types of conduct that the U.S.
Government could determine are contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests for purposes of changes to the Entity List. One example listed in that section is, ‘‘[p]reventing accomplishment of an end use check conducted by or on behalf of BIS or the
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls of the Department of State by: precluding access to; refusing to provide information about; or providing false or misleading information about parties to
the transaction or the item to be
checked.’’

However, end-use checks sometimes cannot be completed for reasons unrelated to the cooperation of the foreign party subject to the end-use check. In such situations, BIS may add persons to the UVL where BIS or federal officials acting on BIS’s behalf have been unable to verify a foreign person’s bona fides (i.e., legitimacy and reliability relating to the end use and end user of items subject to the EAR),where an end-use check, such as a prelicense check (PLC) or a post-shipment verification (PSV), cannot be completed satisfactorily for such purposes for
reasons outside the U.S. Government’s control. For example, BIS sometimes
initiates end-use checks and cannot find a foreign party at the address indicated on export documents, and cannot locate the party by telephone or email. Additionally, BIS sometimes is unable
to conduct end-use checks when host government agencies do not respond to requests to conduct end-use checks or refuse to schedule them in a timely manner. Under these circumstances, there may not be a basis to add the foreign persons at issue to the Entity List, particularly if there is no nexus between the foreign person’s conduct and the failure to produce a complete, accurate and useful check (see § 744.11(b)(4) of the EAR (Criteria for revising the Entity List)). Furthermore, BIS sometimes conducts end-use checks but cannot verify the bona fides of a foreign party. For example, BIS may be unable to verify bona fides if during the conduct of an end-use check a recipient of items subject to the EAR is unable to produce those items for visual inspection or provide sufficient documentation or
other evidence to confirm the disposition of those items. The inability of foreign persons subject to end-use
checks to demonstrate their bona fides raises concerns about the suitability of such persons as participants in futureexports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) and indicates a risk that items subject to the EAR may be diverted to prohibited end uses and/or end users. However, BIS may have insufficient
information to establish that such persons are involved in activities described in § 744.11 of the EAR, preventing the placement of the persons on the Entity List. In such circumstances, those foreign persons may be added to the Unverified List.

On December 19, 2013 (78 FR 76741), BIS published a final rule that amended the EAR by: (1) Requiring exporters to file an AES record for all exports subject to the EAR involving persons listed on the UVL (see § 758.1(b)(8) of the EAR); (2) suspending the availability of license exceptions for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving persons listed on the UVL (see § 740.2(a)(17) of the EAR); (3) requiring exporters, reexporters and transferors (in-country)
to obtain and retain a UVL statement from UVL-listed persons before proceeding with exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) that are not otherwise subject to a license requirement under the EAR involving such persons (see §§ 744.15 and 762.2(b) of the EAR); (4) adding the UVL to Supplement No. 6 to Part 744, and (5) adding to the EAR procedures to request removal or modification of a UVL entry (see § 744.15(d) of the EAR). That rule took effect on January 21, 2014.

Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 (‘‘the UVL’’) contains the names and addresses of foreign persons who are or have been parties to a transaction, as that term is described in § 748.5 of the EAR, involving the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) of items subject to the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS hasbeen unable to verify through an enduse check.

BIS adds a person to the UVL in
accordance with the criteria set forth in § 744.15(c)(1) of the EAR. For example, in some instances, BIS may not be able to conduct an end-use check, such as a PLC or a PSV, at all because, among other potential reasons, BIS was unable to locate or contact the subject of the check or the host government declined to schedule the check in a timely manner. Alternatively, BIS may not be able to complete a satisfactory end-use check because, inter alia , the foreign party is unable to demonstrate its bona fides or the disposition of the items in question during the end-use check. In either circumstance, BIS may determine to add the foreign person to the UVL.

Requests for removal of a UVL entry
must be made in accordance with § 744.15(d) of the EAR. Decisions regarding the removal or modification of UVL listings will be made by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, based on a demonstration by the listed person of its bona fides.

Changes to the EAR

Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 (‘‘the Unverified List’’ or ‘‘UVL’’)

This rule adds twenty-nine (29) persons to the UVL by amending Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 of the
EAR to include their names and addresses. BIS adds these persons in accordance with the criteria for revising the UVL set forth in § 744.15(c) of the EAR. Each listing is grouped by country, and accompanied by the party’s name(s) and address(es) as well as the Federal Register citation and date the person
was added to the UVL. The UVL is included in the Consolidated Screening List, available at www.export.gov. Restrictions and requirements for transactions that include listed persons on the UVL are found in § 744.15 of the

EAR.

AES Record

In addition, this rule contains a requirement for exporters to file an AES record for all exports of tangible items subject to the EAR involving persons listed on the UVL. That requirement was previously proposed and made final in a rule published on December 19, 2013 (78 FR 76741), but inadvertently omitted in a corrections rule published on January 29, 2014 (79 FR 4613). This rule corrects that error by reinserting the AES filing requirement in § 758.1(b)(8).

Savings Clause

Shipments (1) removed from license exception eligibility or that are now subject to requirements in § 744.15 of the EAR as a result of this regulatory action, (2) eligible for export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) without a license before this regulatory action, and (3) on dock for loading, on lighter, laden aboard an exporting carrier, or en route aboard a carrier to a port of export, on June 16, 2014, pursuant to actual orders, may proceed to that UVL listed person


### 34219 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

under the previous license exception eligibility or without a license so long as they have been exported from the United States, reexported or transferred (in-country) before July 16, 2014. Any such items not actually exported, reexported or transferred (in-country) before midnight, on July 16, 2014, are subject to the requirements in § 744.15
of the EAR in accordance with this regulation.

Export Administration Act

Since August 21, 2001, the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, has been in lapse. However, the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013), and as extended by the Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013)
has continued the EAR in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. ). BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order

13637.

Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.

2. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for public comment and a delay in effective date are inapplicable to the provisions of this rule adding 29 persons to the UVL because those provisions in the regulation involve military or foreign affairs. BIS implements this rule to protect U.S. national security or foreign policy interests by requiring a license for items being exported, reexported, or transferred (in country) involving a party or parties to the transaction who
are listed on the UVL. If this rule were delayed to allow for notice and comment and a delay in effective date, then entities being added to the UVL by
this action would continue to be able to
receive items without a license and to conduct activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. In addition, publishing a proposed rule would give these parties notice of the U.S. Government’s intention to place them on the UVL, and would create an incentive for these persons to either accelerate receiving items subject to the
EAR to conduct activities that are contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, and/or to take steps to set up additional aliases, change addresses, and other measures to try to limit the impact of the listing once a final rule was published.

The Department finds there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring prior notice and the opportunity for public comment to the provision of this rule adding Section 758.1(b)(8) because they are contrary to the public interest and unnecessary. The addition of that paragraph was proposed by the Department on September 11, 2013 (78 FR 55664), and made final in a rule published on December 19, 2013 (78 FR 76741). The final rule went into effect on January 21, 2014. Due to an oversight, that paragraph was mistakenly removed through the publication of a rule (79 FR 4613) correcting paragraphs (1) through (7) in § 758.1(b). This rule corrects that inadvertent omission by reinserting paragraph (b)(8).

The Department finds that providing notice and comment is contrary to the public interest because doing so would only cause confusion about what exporters are required to do under the Regulations when exporting items involving a parties or parties who are
listed on the Unverified List. Notice and an opportunity for the public to comment are also unnecessary because, as discussed above, the Department already published a proposed rule giving the public notice and the opportunity to comment on this paragraph. Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule. Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required and none has been prepared.

3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves collections previously approved by OMB under the following control numbers: 0694–0088, 0694– 0122, 0694–0134, and 0694–0137.

This rule slightly increases public
burden in a collection of information approved by OMB under control number 0694–0088, which authorizes, among other things, export license applications. The removal of license exceptions for listed persons on the
Unverified List will result in increased license applications being submitted to BIS by exporters. Total burden hours associated with the Paperwork
Reduction Act and OMB control number 0694–0088 are expected to increase minimally, as the suspension of license exceptions will only affect transactions involving persons listed on the Unverified List and not all export transactions. Because license exceptions are restricted from use, this rule decreases public burden in a collection of information approved by OMB under control number 0694–0137 minimally, as this will only affect specific individual listed persons. The increased burden under 0694–0088 is reciprocal to
the decrease of burden under 0694– 0137, and results in no change of burden to the public. This rule also increases public burden in a collection
of information under OMB control number 0694–0122, as a result of the exchange of UVL statements between private parties, and under OMB control number 0694–0134 as a result of appeals from persons listed on the UVL for removal of their listing. The total
increase in burden hours associated
with both of these collections is expected to be minimal, as they involve a limited number of persons listed on
the UVL.

4. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order

13132.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 744

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.


### 34220 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

15 CFR Part 758

Export clearance requirements. Accordingly, Parts 744 and 758 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) are amended as
follows:

**PART 744—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
Part 744 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013); Notice of September 18, 2013, 78 FR 58151 (September 20, 2013); Notice of November 7, 2013, 78 FR 67289 (November 12, 2013); Notice of January 21, 2014, 79 FR 3721 (January 22, 2014).

■ 2. Supplement No. 6 to Part 744 is
revised to read as follows:

Supplement No. 6 to Part 744—
Unverified List

Exports, reexports, and transfers (incountry) involving parties to the
transaction who are listed in this supplement are subject to the restrictions and requirements outlined in § 744.15 of the EAR.

Country Listed person and address **Federal Register** citation and date of publication

CHINA ..................................... China National Plant Import/Export Co., Room 2135, Jingxin Building A, No Dong San Huan North Road, Beijing, China. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. HONG KONG .......................... Brilliance Technology Ltd, Flat A, 11/F, Adolfo Mansion, 114–116 Austin Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Rm 1203, 12/F, Hip Kwan Commercial Bldg., 38 Pitt Street, Yau Ma Tei,

Hong Kong. Dynasense Photonics Co., Limited, Unit 2209, 22/F, Wu Chung House,

213 Queen’s Road East, Wanchai, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Hi-Shine Technology (HK) Limited, Flat D12, 11/F, King Yip Factory

Bldg, 59 King Yip Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Room 603, 6/F, Hang Pont Commercial Building, 31 Tonking Street,

Cheung Sha Wan, Kowloon, Hong Kong. Hong Kong Haimao Info-Tec Development Co Ltd, Rm 1013B, Well

Fung Ind. Center, Ta Chuen Ping Street, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Lianqi (HK) Electronics Co Ltd, Unit N, 3/F, Hopewell House, 175 Hip

Wo Street, KwunTong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Lion Chip Electronics Ltd, Unit N, 3/F, Hopewell House, 175 Hip Wo

Street, KwunTong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Maipu Communication Technology Co Ltd, 7/F Kerry Warehouse, 36–42

Shan Mei St, Shatin, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Nano Tech International Co Ltd, Unit 5, 27/F, Richmond Commercial

Building, 109 Argyle Street, Mongkok, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Narpel Technology Co., Limited, Unit A, 6/F, Yip Fat Factory Building,

Phase 1, No 77 Hoi Yuen Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. People Tele-com Group, Flat A, 11/F, Adolfo Mansion, 114–116 Austin

Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Powersun Electronics, Flat/Rm 502D, Hang Pont Commercial Building,

31 Tonkin Street, Cheung Sha Wan, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Team Kingdom Limited, Unit 526, 5/F, Advanced Technology Centre, 2

Choi Fat Street, Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Top-Rank Int Trade (HK), Room 201–202, Westin Centre, 26 Hung To

Road, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Units A&B, 15/F, Neich Tower, 128 Gloucester Road, Wanchai, Hong

Kong. Tianao Electronics Limited, Rm 9, 7/F, Block G, East Sun Industrial Ctr,

16 Shing Yip Street, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Vessel Technology Limited, Rm 2309, 23/F, Ho King Comm Ctr, 2–16

Fayuen St., Mongkok, Kowloon, Hong Kong. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Win Electronics Limited, G/F, 26 Pau Chung Street, Tokwawan,

Kowloon, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Rm 2309, 23/F, Ho King Comm Ctr, 2–16 Fayuen St., Mongkok,

Kowloon, Hong Kong. Win-Semi International Ltd, Flat 6, 20/F, Mega Trade Centre, 1–9 Mei

Wan Street, Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Unit 503, 5/F, Silvercord Tower 2, 30 Canton Road, Tsimshatsui, Hong

Kong. Yashen (HK) Electronics, Flat R, 15/F, Phase 2, Goldfield Industrial

Building, 144–150 Tai Lin Pai Road, Kai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014.

Room N, 3/F, Mongkok Building, 97 Mongkok Road, Kowloon, Hong

Kong. ZDAS (HK) Company, G/F, 16 Kwan Tei North Tsuen Leung Yeuk Tau,

Sha Tau Kok Road, Fanling, Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Room 1609, 16/F, Block B, Veristrong Industrial Center, 34–36 Au Pui

Wan Street, FoTaan, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. ZhongJie Electronics, G/F, 26 Pau Chung Street, Tokwawan, Kowloon,

Hong Kong; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014.


### 34221 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Country Listed person and address **Federal Register** citation and date of publication

Rm 2309, 23/F, Ho King Comm Ctr, 2–16 Fayuen St., Mongkok,

Kowloon, Hong Kong. RUSSIA ................................... JSC Voentelecom, Bolshaya Olenya Str. 15A, Moscow, Russia ............... 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014.Nasosy Ampika, 3-ya Institutskaya St. Bld. 15, Moscow, Russia .............. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014.Nuclin LLC, Serebryakova Proezd 14, Moscow, Russia ............................ 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014.SDB IRE RAS, 1 Vvedenskogo Square, Fryazino, Russia ........................ 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Security 2 Business Academy, a.k.a. S2BA, a.k.a. Academy of Business

Security, Deguninskaya Street 10, Moscow, Russia; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Novoslobodskaya Str. 14/19, Moscow, Russia.UNITED ARAB EMIRATES .... Doubair General Trading Co. LLC, P.O. Box 30239, Dubai, UAE ............. 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. Golden Business FZE, Warehouse #FZS1 AN08, Jebel Ali Free Zone,

Dubai, UAE; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. P.O. Box 263128, Dubai, UAE. World Heavy Equipment, Industrial Area 10, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE; and 79 FR [INSERT FR PAGE NUMBER], June 16, 2014. World Equipment Trading L.L.C, Industrial Area 10, Ras Al Khaimah,

UAE.

**PART 758—[AMENDED]**

■ 3. The authority citation for 15 CFR

Part 758 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 2013).

■ 4. Section 758.1 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(8) to read as follows:

**§ 758.1 The Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing to the Automated Export System**  **(AES)**

* * * * *

(b) * * *
(8) For all exports of tangible items subject to the EAR where parties to the transaction, as described in § 748.5(d) through (f) of the EAR, are listed on the Unverified List (Supplement 6 to Part 744 of the EAR), regardless of value or

destination.

* * * * *

Dated: June 11, 2014.

Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export

Administration.

[FR Doc. 2014–14040 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–33–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE** 

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Part 748**

**[Docket No. 140406409–01]**

**RIN 0694–AG15**

**Amendments to Existing Validated**
**End-User Authorizations in the People’s Republic of China: Samsung** 
**China Semiconductor Co. Ltd and Semiconductor Manufacturing**  **International Corporation; Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Correcting amendment.

**SUMMARY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule in
the Federal Register on May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30713), amending existing authorizations in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for Validated End-Users (VEUs) Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd. (Samsung China) and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) in the People’s Republic of China. BIS is correcting an inadvertent typographical error in a citation included in the list of eligible items for SMIC in the May 29 final rule. BIS also makes a conforming change.

**DATES :**  This correction is effective June

16, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User Review Committee, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; by telephone: (202) 482–5991, fax: (202) 482–3991, or email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a
final rule in the Federal Register on May 29, 2014 (79 FR 30713), which amended existing authorizations in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for Validated End-Users (VEUs) Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd. (Samsung China) and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) in the People’s Republic of China. Specifically, BIS amended Supplement No. 7 to Part 748 of the EAR to change the address of the facility used by Samsung China. In addition, BIS added a facility to the list of eligible destinations and an item to the list of eligible items for SMIC. BIS is correcting an inadvertent typographical error in the second citation included in the list of eligible items for SMIC in the May 29 final rule. BIS also makes a conforming change by updating the citation in the ‘‘ Federal Register Citation’’ column in the entry
for SMIC.

List of Subjects 15 CFR Part 748

Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Accordingly, part 748 of the EAR (15 CFR parts 730–774) is amended as
follows:

**PART 748—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 748 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66