alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32


Section
      1350 Certifications




**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
      Officer of Thorium Power, Ltd. This Certification is made pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Report
      on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of Thorium Power, Ltd. for the year ended December
      31, 2006.





The
      undersigned certifies that such 10-KSB, as amended, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such 10-KSB, as amended, fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Thorium Power, Ltd. as of December 31, 2006.





This
      Certification is executed as of September 11, 2007.





*By:
                /s/ Seth Grae**Name:
              Seth Grae**Title:
              President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**(Principal
              Executive Officer)**By:
              /s/ Larry Goldman**Name:
              Larry Goldman**Title:
              Acting Chief Financial Officer**(Principal
              Financial Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Thorium Power Ltd. and will be retained by Thorium Power and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
### Cover Letter

{XXX} {XXX} {XXX} {XXX} August 28, 2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics USEPA Confidential Business Information Center (CBIC) EPA East Building Room 6428 1201 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3302 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION To Whom It May Concern: Please find attached a Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for {XXX} TS-13N06K. Please note that the PMN contains confidential business information. {XXX} For any questions regarding this PMN, please contact {XXX} Sincerely, {XXX} Authorized signatory
Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION25BMVJUK CHLO130828306255310 13NO6K

X

X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONX


### X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X

X X X X X Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X

XXX 

### X XXX 

### X XXX 

### X See Attachment 001 (blank1 c.pdf)

blank1 c.pdf Page 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONChloridite Reaction Mixture

Chloridite XXX XXX XXX X XXX XXX XXX X XXX XXX XXX X XXX XXX XXX X XXX XXX XXX X

none Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX 

### X

X Chemical Intermediate XXX X XXX X XXX X XXX XXX XXX XXX X

Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X XXX XXX XXX 

### X XXX X

XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

### X

Page 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONSee Attachment 003 (blank p5.pdf)

blank p5.pdf Page 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX X X X X

Page 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSION0

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 blank blank1 c.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 1 002 blank blank.pdf 7 003 Mfg_use_sanitized_dia blank p5.pdf Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. 1

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name blank 

### Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number CHLO130828306255310

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name blank 

### Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number CHLO130828306255310

### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name Mfg_use_sanitized_dia 

### Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. Does not contain CBI 

### Report Number CHLO130828306255310
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ariba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert M. Calderoni, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James W. Frankola, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT M.
CALDERONIRobert M. CalderoniChief Executive Officer


Date: December 1, 2006



/s/    JAMES W. FRANKOLAJames W. FrankolaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: December 1, 2006
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
                 Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                Quarter Ended
                                                  April  5,
                                              ----------------
                                               2000     2001
                                              -------  -------
<S>                                           <C>      <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    11,883   12,576
                                              =======  =======

Net income                                    $ 6,286  $ 2,926
                                              =======  =======

Net income per common share                   $  0.53  $  0.23
                                              =======  =======

DILUTED
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    11,883   12,576

Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding
during the period                                 255      141

Total common and common equivalent
                                              -------  -------
shares                                         12,138   12,717
                                              =======  =======

Net income                                    $ 6,286  $ 2,926
                                              =======  =======

Net income per common share                   $  0.52  $  0.23
                                              =======  =======
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
Daniel GARNICKI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

Daniel Garnicki, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Galindez v. State*, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla. 2007) and *Behl v. State*, 898 So.2d 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0497

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 18, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This appeal is dismissed on account of appellant's failure to comply with this court's order dated February 12, 2018, requiring appellant to submit a copy of the circuit court order or orders being appealed.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Katina Rochelle CANDRICK, also known as Katina Lofton, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-51325 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 10, 2017

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Katina Rochelle Candrick, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Katina Rochelle Candrick, federal prisoner # 39629-177, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce her sentence based on Amendment 794 to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. By moving to proceed IFP, Candrick is challenging the district court’s certification that her appeal was not taken in good faith. *See Baugh v. Taylor,*117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our inquiry into a litigant’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” *Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

The Supreme Court has prescribed a two-step inquiry for a district court that is considering a § 3582(c)(2) motion. *Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 826, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). The court must first determine whether a prisoner is eligible for a reduction as set forth in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a). *Id.*If she is eligible, then the district court must “consider any applicable [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors and determine whether, in its discretion,” any reduction is warranted under the particular facts of the case. *Id.*at 827, 130 S.Ct. 2683. We review the decision whether to reduce a sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for an abuse of discretion. *United States v. Henderson,*636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011).

Although Candrick conclusionally asserts that she is entitled to a reduction, she abandons by failing to brief any argument challenging the district court’s determination that she is ineligible because Amendment 794 is not retroactively applicable. *United States v. Charles,*469 F.3d 402, 408 (5th Cir. 2006). Even had she briefed the argument, it would fail because Amendment 794 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(d), p.s., and thus has not been made retroactively applicable. *See Dillon,*560 U.S. at 826, 130 S.Ct. 2683.

Candrick therefore cannot show an abuse of discretion on the district court’s part. *See Henderson,*636 F.3d at 717. She has failed to show that she will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. *See Howard,*707 F.2d at 220. Accordingly, the IFP motion is DENIED. Additionally, because *72this appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certificate Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L.
Dick Buell, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ L. Dick BuellL. Dick BuellChief Executive Officerand Director (Principal Executive Officer)August 16, 2004
 27
NU-BEST WHIPLASH INJURY CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Steven J. MAFFIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EX PARTE Tony WILLIAMS

1160379 (CR-15-1109)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                       LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE & SALOON, INC.
                        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
                  FOR THE FIFTY-THREE WEEKS ENDED JUNE 17, 1997
                                   (UNAUDITED)



Net sales                                                         $ 541,226,050
Costs and expenses:
        Costs of sales                                              189,350,437
        Restaurant operating expenses                               186,145,926
        Depreciation and amortization                                28,779,798
                                                                  -------------
Restaurant costs and expenses                                       404,276,161
                                                                  -------------
Restaurant operating income                                         136,949,889
General and administrative expenses                                  20,778,897
                                                                  -------------
Income from operations                                              116,170,992

Other income, principally interest                                    4,464,105
                                                                  -------------

Income before income taxes and minority interest                    120,635,097
Provision for income taxes                                          (44,690,330)
Minority interest                                                      (166,811)
                                                                  -------------
Net income                                                        $  75,777,956
                                                                  =============

Primary net income per share                                      $        1.82
                                                                  =============
# Официален вестник C 164A/29 м

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 164A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 5729 май 2014 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 164A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 5729 май 2014 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейска централна банка |
| 2014/C 164A/01 | Удължаване на крайния срок за подаване на заявления за назначаването на членове на Административния съвет за преглед | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска централна банка

2014/C 164A/01

Удължаване на крайния срок за подаване на заявления за назначаването на членове на Административния съвет за преглед

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 164A/02 | Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси | 2 |

2014/C 164A/02

Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси

2

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска централна банка

| 29.5.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 164/1

---

Удължаване на крайния срок за подаване на заявления за назначаването на членове на Административния съвет за преглед

2014/C 164 A/01

С настоящото ЕЦБ съобщава, че крайният срок за подаване на заявленията за кандидатстване съгласно Поканата за изразяване на интерес за външни експерти, които да бъдат назначени като членове и заместници на членове на Административния съвет за преглед на Европейската централна банка (Франкфурт на Майн, Германия), публикувана в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз на 1 май 2014 г. (1), е удължен до 2 юни 2014 г.

Франкфурт на Майн, 23 май 2014 г.

---

(1)  ОВ C 133 A, 1.5.2014 г., стр. 1.

---

29.5.2014

| 29.5.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 164/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 164/2

---

ПРЕГЛЕД НА БРОЕВЕТЕ НА ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК СЕРИЯ С А КОНКУРСИ

2014/C 164 A/02

По-долу е даден списък на броевете на Официален вестник от серия С А, публикувани през настоящата година.

Освен ако не е посочено друго, броевете на Официален вестник са публикувани на всички езици.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

---
#### Terry Darryl KITCHEN, Jr., Petitioner, v. Marion SPEARMAN, Respondent.

No. 14-70299

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted December 12, 2014

Filed January 27, 2017

Paul McCarthy, Attorney, Law Offices of Robert J. Beles, Oakland, CA, Robert Joseph Beles, Oakland, CA, Manisha Dar-yani, Attorney, Law Offices of Beles *&*Beles, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner

David Andrew Eldridge, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, N.R. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER *

The Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition, filed with this court on February 3, 2014, is GRANTED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
John BURKE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-3042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Eilam Isaak of Isaak Law, PLLC, Tampa, for Petitioner

Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, and Brandi Y. Thompson, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Continental Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Roger S. Busse, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard R. Sawyer, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Roger S. Busse      |  |  |  | /s/ Richard R. Sawyer  
|Roger S. Busse          |  |  |  | Richard R. Sawyer      
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: April 19, 2017
#### Page, *Adm’r etc. v.*Cook, *Adm’x etc.*

*AkmikistbatioN*— Letters, *when not evidence.*— Letters of administration issued by a clerk of the probate court, acting under authority of the Confederate State Constitution of 1861, *after*the inauguration of the State provisional government of 1864, are void, being issued without legal authority, and are not admissible in evidence.

*Appeal from Columbia Circuit Court.*

*123Hon. JohN T. Bearden, Circuit Judge.

*■James li. Page,*and *E. W. Gantt,*for appellant.

*Watkins Pose,*for appellee.

GrEGP, J.,

This is an appeal prosecuted from a judgment of the probate •court of Columbia county.

On the 20th of April,’1867, the appellant presented to the appellee for allowance, a claim founded upon two judgments, rendered in 1859, against her intestate. She rejected the claims, and the cause was submitted to the probate court on pleas of limitation, non-claim and payment. The court found for the appellee, and rendered judgment against the appellant for costs, from which he appealed to the circuit court. The judgment was there affirmed, and he appealed to this court.

Upon the trial in the probate court, the transcripts of the judgments rendered against the deceased, in his lifetime, were admitted to be properly certified, etc.

After introducing the transcripts, the claimant read in evidence, the letters of administration granted appellee, on said estate, in September, 1865.

The appellee, over the appellant’s objection, was then allowed to read in evidence, letters of administration issued to her, on tjxe 31st day of March, 1861, by one Daniel Dixon, as clerk of said county, who testified that he was not then acting as clerk under the Constitution and laws of 1864, but under the Confederate Constitution of 1861, and a commission issued by Harris Flanagan, as Governor of Arkansas.

There was no proof of payment, and it is not insisted that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, but it is here insisted, as was held by the courts below, that the statute of non-claim cut off the demand, because it was not presented *124to such administratrix within two years from the 31st day of March, 1864.

At that time, a new Constitution had been adopted and ratified, and a valid provisional government inaugurated and put in force, and Dixon, who issued these pretended letters of administration, of March 31, 1864, was not then an officer of the government of the State of Arkansas, and consequently had no lawful authority to issue letters of administration.

These pretended letters were void, and should not have been admitted in evidence. The probate court, therefore, erred in admitting them, and in finding that issue in favor of the ap-j)ellee.

This ei’ror appeared upon the face of the record, and the circuit court should, therefore, have granted a trial *de*novo, and for the error in refusing so to do, the judgment of that court is reversed, and this cause is remanded, to be proceeded in according to law.

IIaRrisoN, J., dissenting.