Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices 7423 

1See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 

Intent to Rescind, in Part; 2019, 86 FR 43173 

(August 6, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Global Aluminum Distributor, LLC’s Letter, 

‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China; C–570–968; Case Brief,’’ dated September 

4, 2021; see also Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L.’s Letter, 

‘‘Case Brief of Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L.,’’ dated 

September 7, 2021; and JL Trading Corp.’s, Puertas 

Y Ventanas JM Inc.’s, and Industrias Feliciano Al 

Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the 

People’s Republic of China: Case Brief,’’ dated 

September 7, 2021. 

3See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal 

Brief,’’ dated September 16, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated December 2, 

2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated January 19, 

2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Final Results of 2019 Administrative Review of 

Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Placement of ‘Kingtom AFA 

Memorandum’ on the Record,’’ dated January 27, 

2022. 

8See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on 

Kingtom AFA Memorandu,’’ dated January 31, 

2022; see also Kingtom’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum 

Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China, 

Case No. C–570–968: Kingtom Response to 

Placement of AFA Memorandum on the Record,’’ 

dated February 1, 2022. 

9See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 

FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum 

Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: 

AFA Calculation Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Review; 2019,’’ dated February 2, 2022 

(AFA Calculation Memorandum). 

11See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

V. Adjournment 

Dated: Friday, February 4, 2022. 

David Mussatt, 

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02711 Filed 2–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–968] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission 

of Review, in Part; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) during the 

period of review (POR), January 1, 2019, 

through December 31, 2019. In addition, 

we are rescinding the review for 

numerous companies for which the 

request for review was withdrawn. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Davina Friedmann, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0698. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review in the 

Federal Register.1 We invited parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. On 

September 7, 2021, case briefs were 

filed by the following interested parties: 

Global Aluminum Distributor; Kingtom 

Aluminio S.R.L. (Kingtom); and JL 

Trading Co., Puertas Y Ventanas JM Inc., 

and Industrias Feliciano Al Inc.2 On 

September 17, 2021, the Aluminum Fair 

Trade Committee (the petitioner) 

submitted a rebuttal brief.3 On 

December 2, 2021, Commerce extended 

the final results of review by 48 days, 

until January 21, 2021.4 On January 20, 

2022, Commerce extended the final 

results by an additional 12 days, until 

February 2, 2022.5 For a full description 

of the events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6 On January 27, 

2022, Commerce placed a memorandum 

on the record regarding Commerce’s 

AFA determination with respect to 

Kingtom for the preliminary results of 

review (Kingtom AFA Memorandum) 

and invited interested parties to submit 

comments.7 On January 31, 2022, and 

on February 1, 2022, the petitioner and 

Kingtom, respectively, submitted 

comments on the Kingtom AFA 

Memorandum.8

Scope of the Order 9

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is aluminum extrusions from 

China. For the complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in interested parties’ 

briefs and comments are addressed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

A list of the issues raised by interested 

parties, and to which Commerce 

responded in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, is provided in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review and analysis of 

the comments received from parties, 

Commerce made changes to certain 

program-specific rates applied to 

Kingtom on the basis of adverse facts 

available (AFA). See AFA Calculation 

Memorandum.10

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a 

government-provided financial 

contribution that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and the subsidy is 

specific.11 For a full description of the 

methodology underlying all of 

Commerce’s conclusions, including any 

determination that relied upon the use 

of AFA pursuant to section 776(a) and 

(b) of the Act, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

our intent to rescind the review with 

respect to companies named in the 

Initiation Notice for which all review 

requests were timely withdrawn in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

These companies are listed in Appendix 

II of this notice. For these companies, 

Commerce is rescinding the 

administrative review and will assess 

duties at rates equal to the rates of the 

cash deposits for estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
7424 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices 

12See Preliminary Results. In the Preliminary 

Results, Commerce inadvertently provided an 

incorrect list of companies on which it intended to 

rescind the administrative review at Appendix II. 

Commerce has included the correct list of 

companies for which it will rescind this 

administrative review, in accordance with the 

withdrawal of requests review submitted by the 

petitioner on October 8, 2020. See Petitioner’s 

Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Partial Withdrawal of Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated October 8, 2020. 

13See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2014, 81 FR 92778 (December 20, 2016). 

14See Preliminary Results; see also AFA 

Calculation Memorandum. 

15As stated in the Preliminary Results under the 

section titled, ‘‘Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies Under Review,’’ this subsidy rate 

reflects the subsidy rate calculated for a mandatory 

respondent in the 2014 administrative review of 

this countervailing duty order. 

POR, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1).12

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review 

For the companies not selected for 

individual examination, because we 

have not calculated rates for any 

company selected for individual 

examination, we have no such rates to 

use as a basis to determine the rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination in this review. Thus, we 

applied the above-de minimis, non-AFA 

countervailable subsidy rate from the 

most recently completed administrative 

review of the Order, in which we 

calculated a subsidy rate for an 

individual mandatory respondent, i.e., 

the 2014 administrative review of this 

Order.13 For further discussion, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

We determine the following final 

countervailable subsidy rates for the 

period January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019: 14

Company 

Ad Valorem rate 

(percent) 

CRRC Changzhou Auto Parts 

Co. Ltd .................................... 15 16.08 

Jiangsu Asia-Pacific Light Alloy 

Technology Co Ltd .................. 242.56 

Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co. Ltd .............................. 16.08 

Kingtom Aluminio SRL ............... 242.56 

Uniton Investment Ltd ................ 16.08 

Wellste Material Co Ltd .............. 242.56 

Disclosure 

In this case, the only calculation to 

disclose is the calculation of the AFA 

rate assigned to certain respondents. 

Therefore, Commerce will disclose to 

the parties in this proceeding the 

calculation performed for these final 

results within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), 

Commerce will determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review, for the 

above-listed companies at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rates, Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions, 

including assessment instructions for 

those companies for which we 

rescinded the review, to CBP no earlier 

than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

rates shown for each of the companies 

listed above on shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review. For 

all non-reviewed firms, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to continue to collect cash 

deposits of estimated countervailing 

duties at the most recent companyspecific or all-others rate applicable to 

the company, as appropriate. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rescission of the Administrative Review, 

In Part 

V. Rate for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

VI. Use of Facts Available and Application of 

Adverse Inferences 

VII. Subsidy Programs Subject to 

Countervailable Duties 

VIII. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

IX. Analysis of Comment 

X. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies for 

Which We Are Rescinding This 

Administrative Review 

1. Allpower Display Co., Ltd 

2. Amidi Zhuhai 

3. Anderson International 

4. Asia-Pacific Light Alloy (Nantong) 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

5. Beauty Sky Technology Co. Ltd 

6. Changshu Changsheng Aluminum 

Products Co., Ltd. 

7. Chenming Industry and Commerce 

Shouguang Co., Ltd. 

8. China International Freight Co. Ltd 

9. China State Decoration Group Co., Ltd. 

10. Custom Accessories Asia Ltd. 

11. Everfoison Industry Ltd. 

12. Foshan City Fangyuan Ceramic 

13. Foshan City Nanhai Yongfeng Aluminum 

14. Foshan City Top Deal Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

15. Foshan Gold Bridge Import and Export 

Co. Ltd. 

16. Foshan Golden Promise Import and 

Export Co., Ltd. 

17. Foshan Guangshou Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

18. Foshan Xingtao Aluminum Profile Co., 

Ltd. 

19. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Inc. 

20. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

21. Fuzhou Ruifuchang Trading Co., Ltd. 

22. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

23. Gebruder Weiss 

24. Gold Bridge International 

25. Grupo Emb 

26. Grupo Europeo La Optica 

27. Grupo Pe No Mato In 

28. Guangdong Gaoming Guangtai Shicai 

29. Guangdong Gaoxin Communication 

Equipment Industrial Co., Ltd. 

30. Guangdong Golden China Economy 

31. Guangdong Maoming Foreign Trade 

Enterprise Development Co. 

32. Guangdong Taiming Metal Products Co., 

LTD. 

33. Guangdong Victor Aluminum Co., Ltd. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices 7425 

1See 19 CFR 351.225(o). 

2See Notice of Scope Rulings, 86 FR 69619 

(December 8, 2021). 

34. Guangzhou Jintao Trade Company 

35. Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

36. Hangzhou Tonny Electric and Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

37. Hefei Sylux Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

38. Hong Kong Dayo Company, Ltd. 

39. Huazhijie Plastic Products 

40. Huiqiao International Shanghai 

41. Ilshim Almax 

42. Jer Education Technology 

43. Jiangsu Weatherford Hongda Petroleum 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

44. Jiangsu Yizheng Haitian Aluminum 

Industrial 

45. Jiang Yin Ming Ding Aluminum & Plastic 

Products Co. Ltd 

46. Jilin Qixing Aluminum Industries Co., 

Ltd. 

47. Jin Lingfeng Plastic Electrical Appliance 

48. Larkcop International Co Ltd 

49. Ledluz Co Ltd 

50. Liansu Group Co. Ltd 

51. Links Relocations Beijing 

52. Marshell International 

53. Modular Assembly Technology 

54. Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology 

55. Ningbo Hightech Development 

56. Ningbo Winjoy International Trading 

57. Orient Express Container 

58. Ou Chuang Plastic Building Material 

(Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 

59. Pentagon Freight Service 

60. Pro Fixture Hong Kong 

61. Qingdao Sea Nova Building 

62. Qingdao Yahe Imports and Exports 

63. Rollease Acmeda Pty 

64. Sewon 

65. Shandong Huajian Aluminum Industry 

66. Shanghai EverSkill M&E Co., Ltd. 

67. Shanghai Jingxin Logistics 

68. Shanghai Ouma Crafts Co, Ltd. 

69. Shanghai Phidix Trading 

70. Sinogar Aluminum 

71. Sunvast Trade Shanghai 

72. Suzhou Mingde Aluminum 

73. Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. 

74. Taizhou Puan Lighting Technology 

75. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd. 

76. United Aluminum 

77. Wanhui Industrial China 

78. Wenzhou Yongtai Electric Co., Ltd. 

79. Winstar Power Technology Limited 

80. Wisechain Trading Ltd. 

81. Wuxi Lotus Essence 

82. Wuxi Rapid Scaffolding Engineering 

83. Wuxi Zontai Int’l Corporation Ltd. 

84. Xuancheng Huilv Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

85. Yekalon Industry Inc 

86. Yonn Yuu Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

87. Yuyao Royal Industrial 

88. Zhejiang Guoyao Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

89. Zhejiang Shiner Import and Export 

90. Zhongshan Broad Windows and Doors 

and Curtain 

91. ZL Trade Shanghai 

[FR Doc. 2022–02650 Filed 2–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Notice of Scope Rulings 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable February 9, 2022. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) hereby publishes a list of 

scope rulings and anti-circumvention 

determinations made during the period 

October 1, 2021–December 31, 2021. We 

intend to publish future lists after the 

close of the next calendar quarter. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marcia E. Short, AD/CVD Operations, 

Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

202–482–1560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce regulations provide that it 

will publish in the Federal Register a 

list of scope rulings on a quarterly 

basis.1 Our most recent notification of 

scope rulings was published on 

December 8, 2021.2 This current notice 

covers all scope rulings and anticircumvention determinations made by 

Enforcement and Compliance between 

October 1, 2021–December 31, 2021. 

Scope Rulings Made October 1, 2021, 

Through December 31, 2021 

Korea 

A–580–809: Certain Circular Welded 

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea 

Requestor: Mando America 

Corporation. Twenty-one base shells are 

not covered by the scope of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

from Korea because they are mechanical 

tubing or are cold drawn; November 19, 

2021. 

Mexico 

A–201–805: Certain Circular Welded 

Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico 

Requestor: Mando America 

Corporation. Twenty-one base shells are 

not covered by the scope of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

from Mexico because they are 

mechanical tubing or are cold drawn; 

November 19, 2021. 

People’s Republic of China (China) 

A–570–909: Certain Steel Nails From 

China 

Requestor: Roy G. Evans Co., Inc., dba 

EVCO. The stock keeping unit (SKU) 

number NP100S steel mobile home 

skirting spikes and the steel mobile 

home skirting spikes found within the 

SKU KNP100S mobile home skirting kit 

are covered by the scope of the 

antidumping duty order on certain steel 

nails from China because the physical 

characteristics of the products in 

question fell under the description 

listed in the scope language; November 

5, 2021. 

A–570–890: Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture From China 

Requester: Jimco Lamp & 

Manufacturing Co. Six chests are not 

covered by the scope of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from China because 

they are accent furniture rather than 

wooden bedroom furniture; December 3, 

2021. 

A–570–117 and C–570–118: Wood 

Mouldings and Millwork Products From 

China 

Requestor: Boise Cascade Company. 

Solid sawn wood planking imported by 

Boise Cascade is not covered by the 

scopes of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on wood 

mouldings and millwork products from 

because the product is an exterior siding 

product which is not laminated veneer 

lumber (LVL) or finger-jointed; 

December 14, 2021. 

A–570–117 and C–570–118: Wood 

Mouldings and Millwork Products From 

China 

Requestor: Global Product Sourcing 

LLC. Exterior siding products/solid 

sawn wood planks are not covered by 

the scopes of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on wood 

mouldings and millwork products from 

China because the products are not LVL 

and are not finger-jointed; December 15, 

2021. 

A–570–124 and C–570–125: Certain 

Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc 

and Up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof 

(Small Vertical Engines), From China 

Requestor: FNA Group, Inc (FNA). 

FNA’s dual-piston engines are not 

covered by the scope of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders on small vertical engines from 

China because the plain language of the 

scope only covers ‘‘single-cylinder’’ 

engines; December 27, 2021. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1