### 31613 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices

Mary Forbes, Paperwork Reduction Act Reports Clearance Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–13439 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4151–17–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Centers for Disease Control and Prevention** 

**[Docket Number NIOSH–063B]**

**NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program**  **(FFFIPP)**

**AGENCY :**  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

**ACTION :**  Notice of public comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) requests stakeholder input on the progress and future directions of the NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program (FFFIPP). NIOSH is seeking stakeholder input on the FFFIPP to ensure that the program is meeting the needs and expectations of the U.S. fire service, and to identify ways in which the program can be improved to increase its impact on the safety and health of fire fighters across the United States. NIOSH will compile and consider all comments received through the NIOSH docket and use them in making decisions on how to proceed with the FFFIPP.

**DATES :**  Public Comment Period: Written or electronic comments must be received on or before July 29, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Written comments on the FFFIPP program and suggestions for enhancing the impact of the program and future directions should be submitted, identified by docket number NIOSH–063B, by any of the following methods:

• Mail: NIOSH Docket Office, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS–C34, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH
45226.

• Facsimile: (513) 533–8285.

• E-mail: nioshdocket@cdc.gov, or submitted using the on-line form available through the NIOSH docket at the following link: http://www.cdc.gov/ niosh/docket/review/docket063B/ default.html. E-mail attachments should be formatted in Microsoft Word. Comments should be submitted to NIOSH no later than July 29, 2011 and should reference Docket Number NIOSH–063B.

All information received in response to this notice will be available for public examination and copying at the NIOSH Docket Office, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. A complete electronic docket containing all comments submitted will be available on the NIOSH Web page at http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket, and comments will be available in writing by request. NIOSH includes all comments received without change in the docket and the electronic docket, including any personal information provided.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Paul Moore, NIOSH, Division of Safety Research (DSR), 1095 Willowdale Road, MS–1808, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, PMoore@cdc.gov or fax (304) 285–5474, telephone (304) 285–5991.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  NIOSH convened stakeholders’ meetings in 1998, March 2006 and November 2008 to seek input to help guide the FFFIPP. The input provided by stakeholders at those meetings was very valuable in providing insight into stakeholder needs and expectations. NIOSH is again seeking stakeholder input through a public docket. There are several resources that may be useful to individuals and groups who would like to comment on the FFFIPP:

• The NIOSH FFFIPP Progress Report and Proposed Future Directions—2011. This document includes specific topics for stakeholder input. http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/ future2011.html

• The Strategic Plan for the NIOSH FFFIPP that was finalized in 2009 after public input. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ fire/strategicplan2009.html

• The FFFIPP Web site that includes an overview of the FFFIPP, fatality investigation reports and other publications. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ fire/

Dated:May 21, 2011. John Howard, Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011–13533 Filed 5–31–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4163–19–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND**  **HUMAN SERVICES**

**Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services** 

**[Document Identifier: CMS–10379]**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB**  **Review; Comment Request**

**AGENCY :**  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS.

In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following summary of proposed collections for public comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the Agency’s function; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden.

1. Type of Information Collection Request: New Collection; Title of Information Collection: Rate Increase Disclosure and Review Reporting Requirements (45 CFR Part 154). Use: Under the Section 1003 of the Affordable Care Act (Section 2794 of the Public Health Service Act), The Secretary, in conjunction with the States, is required to establish a process for the annual review, beginning with the 2010 plan year, of unreasonable increases in premiums for health insurance coverage. Section 2794 directs the Secretary to ensure the public disclosure of information of unreasonable rate increases and justification for those increases.

On December 23, 2010, CMS published a proposed rate review regulation in the Federal Register for public comment (Rate Increase Disclosure and Review Rule, 75 FR 81004). CMS revised the proposed rule based on the public comments and published the final rate review regulation in the Federal Register on May 19, 2011. The final rule defines the unreasonable rate review process and issuer reporting and disclosure requirements (Rate Increase Disclosure and Review Rule, 76 FR 29964). The


### 31614 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2011 / Notices

regulation establishes the following reporting requirements:

• The Preliminary Justification: This data collection is required of all health insurance issuers for all rate increases that exceed the ‘‘subject to review’’ ’ reporting threshold as defined in the rule. This information will be posted on an HHS Web site.

• Rate Review Final Determination: This data collection requires States with effective rate review programs and CMS to report their review findings and unreasonable rate increase determinations on all rate increases that are subject to review. This information will be posted on an HHS Web site.

• The Final Justification for An Unreasonable Rate Increase: This data collection is required of health insurance issuers that elect to implement a rate increase that is determined to be unreasonable based on State or CMS review. This information will be posted on the Health Insurance Issuer’s Web site and on a CMS Web site. 2. Preliminary Justification

The Preliminary Justification consists of three parts, Part I: Rate Increase Summary, Part II: Written Explanation of the Rate Increase, and Part III: Rate Filing Documentation. Issuers must complete Parts I and II for all rate increases that exceed the reporting threshold as defined in the rule. As described in the preamble of the rule, this information would be collected to provide consumers with basic information on all rate increases that are subject to review under the rate review
program.

Under the rule, ‘‘subject to review’’ rate increases would be reviewed by either States or CMS, depending on whether a State has an effective rate review program. Issuers would only be required to submit Part III of the Preliminary Justification when CMS is conducting the review of a rate increase that is ‘‘subject to review. ’’ Accordingly, Part III requires health insurance issuers to provide detailed rate data that would be used for the purposes of conducting thorough actuarial reviews and for making determinations about whether rate increases are unreasonable. This Notice contains the following information about the Preliminary Justification:

• Preliminary Justification Issuer Instructions: Health insurance issuer instructions for completing all three parts of the Preliminary Justification.

• Part I Worksheet: A standardized Excel worksheet that must be used to complete Part I of the Preliminary Justification. • Sample Internet display of the Rate Review Consumer Disclosure: Information provided in the Preliminary Justification would be posted on an HHS Web site. This sample display shows how the information contained in the Part I Worksheet would be displayed
to consumers.

3. Rate Review Final Determination

Under the rule, States and CMS would have to provide a Rate Review Final Determination at the close of their review of all ‘‘ subject to review’’ rate increases. The Rate Review Final Determination must provide the State’s or CMS’ determination on whether a rate increase is ‘unreasonable’. Section 154.301(a)(3) of the rule provides a list of actuarial review elements that must be taken into account as part of the rate review process. The Final Determination must provide a brief statement explaining how the review of elements set forth in § 154.301(a)(3) caused the State or CMS to arrive at its determination that the rate is unreasonable.

The Rate Review Final Determination will be entered into a data entry text box in the Rate Review Data Collection System. CMS is estimating that this statement would be approximately a paragraph in length. There is no specific form or set of instructions associated with this reporting requirement, apart from the reporting requirements provided in the rule. The information provided in the Rate Review Final Determination will be posted as part of the rate review consumer disclosure information on an HHS Web site.
4. Final Justification for An Unreasonable Rate Increase

The rule states that if a health insurance issuer implements a rate increase determined by CMS or a State to be unreasonable, the health insurance issuer must provide a Final Justification for an Unreasonable Rate Increase. In the Final Justification, issuers would have to provide a short statement about why they are electing to implement an unreasonable rate increase. This statement would be entered into a data entry text box in the Rate Review Data Collection System and would not need to be more than a paragraph or two in length. There is no form or instructions associated with this statement apart from the requirements provided in the regulation.

The Final Justification Statement will be posted on an HHS Web site in the same location as the Preliminary Justification and Rate Review Final Determination. Additionally, health insurance issuers implementing rate increases that were determined to be unreasonable, must post all of this information—the Preliminary Justification, the Rate Review Final Determination, and the Final Justification Statement on their Web sites for a period of 3 years. Form Number: CMS–10379; (OCN: 0938– NEW) Frequency: Annually; Affected Public: Private Sector and States; Number of Respondents: 452; Number of Responses: 3,571; Total Annual Hours: 11,902. (For policy questions regarding this collection, contact Sally McCarty at (301) 492–4489 or RateReview@hhs.gov. For all other issues call 410–786–1326.)

To be assured consideration, comments and recommendations for the proposed information collections must be received by the OMB desk officer at the address below, no later than 5 p.m.

on June 27, 2011.

OMB, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: CMS DeskOfficer, Fax Number: (202) 395–6974, Email: OIRA

_submission@omb.eop.gov.

Dated: May 26, 2011. Martique Jones, Director, Regulations Development Group, Division B, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–13458 Filed 5–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4120–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES** 

**Administration for Children and Families** 

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

Title: State Developmental Disabilities Council 5-Year State Plan.

OMB No.: 0980–0162. Description: A Plan developed by the State Council on Developmental Disabilities is required by federal statute. Each State Council on Developmental Disabilities must develop the plan, provide for approval by the State Governor, and finally submit the plan on a five-year basis. On an annual basis, the Council must review the plan and make any amendments. The State Plan will be used (1) By the Council as a planning document; (2) by the citizenry of the State as a mechanism for commenting on the plans of the Council; and (3) by the Department as a stewardship tool, for ensuring compliance with the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, as one basis for providing technical assistance ( e.g.,