alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6162 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6162

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 379 North Oates Street in Dothan, Alabama, as the ``LaBruce `Bruce' 
                    Tidwell Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LABRUCE ``BRUCE'' TIDWELL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 379 North Oates Street in Dothan, Alabama, shall be known 
and designated as the ``LaBruce `Bruce' Tidwell Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``LaBruce 
`Bruce' Tidwell Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6162

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 379 North Oates Street in Dothan, Alabama, as the ``LaBruce `Bruce' 
                    Tidwell Post Office Building''.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.8

May 23, 2002

Mr. Frank ten Brink
Waste Systems, Inc.
28161 N. Keith Drive
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045


VIA FACSIMILE:  (847) 367-9462


Dear Mr. ten Brink:

        As agreed the Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated
October 1, 1998 in the remaining principle amount of $4,829,378.97, payable to
Waste Systems, Inc. ("WSI") should be revised and extended as described below.

Proposed Terms:

        a.  Maturity. The Note will mature October 1, 2003.

        b.  Repayment of principal: 3CI will repay $700,000 in principal upon
            execution of this agreement. Additionally 3CI will make monthly
            payments of accrued interest and principal to total $100,000 each
            due on the 1st day of each month starting July 1, 2002.

        c.  Revolver Facility: WSI will allow 3CI to draw up to $100,000 from a
            new revolver facility, which facility will also expire October 1,
            2003.

        d.  Interest Rate, starting June 1, 2002. Wall Street Journal "Money
            Rates" (Southwestern Edition) Prime Rate plus 1.0% per annum not to
            exceed 13%.

        e.  Financial Covenant. The Amended and Restated Note will contain a
            minimum EBITDA covenant of $900,000 for the six months ending June
            30, 2002 and for each reporting quarter thereafter until maturity.
            Such covenant will be measured on a trailing six months basis and
            will not include the effect, if any, of the one-time write off or
            loss on disposal of assets. If the minimum EBITDA goal is not
            obtained for any of the 6 months periods described above, a fee
            equal to 3% per annum for the six months period will be assessed
            payable in fifteen days from the end of the given quarter.

<PAGE>
Frank ten Brink
May 23, 2002
WSI note extension
Page 2 of 2


        f.  Confirmation of Existing Liens. The Company will ratify and confirm
            all existing liens in favor of WSI securing the Note.

        g.  Payment of WSI Fees and Expenses. The Company shall pay all of WSI's
            reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by it in connection with
            the negotiation and documentation of the Proposed Note and related
            documents and instruments.

        h.  Waiver of Existing Defaults. WSI will waive, if applicable, and upon
            receipt of penalty interest due, all existing events of default
            under the Note through May 30, 2002.

Please indicate your acceptance by signing and faxing back to me.

Sincerely,

/s/ JOHN R. WEAVER
-------------------
John R. Weaver
CFO


/s/ FRANK J.M. TEN BRINK
------------------------
Frank J.M. ten Brink
Vice President
Waste Systems, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WALKER
INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           12000
<SECURITIES>                                     11388
<RECEIVABLES>                                    30407
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1537
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 50295
<PP&E>                                           29155
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   74195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                       29373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     74195
<SALES>                                          49251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 49251
<CGS>                                            25593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    64132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     12501
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (26909)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.92)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of NaviSite, Inc.


Subsidiary                                  Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                  -----------------------------

Avasta, Inc.                                California
ClearBlue Technologies Management, Inc.     Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Chicago-Wells, Inc.  Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Las Vegas, Inc.      Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Los Angeles, Inc.    Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Milwaukee, Inc.      Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Oakbrook, Inc.       Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Vienna, Inc.         Delaware
Conxion Corporation                         California
Intrepid Acquisition Corp.                  Delaware
NaviSite Acquisition Corp.                  Delaware
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Albino GARZA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11287 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 24, 2017

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jose Albino Garza, Pro Se

Before KING, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Albino Garza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should, not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
ERNST & YOUNG LOGO

                               o Kost Forer & Gabbay     o Phone: 972-3-6232525
                                 3 Aminadav St.            Fax: 972-3-5622555
                                 Tel-Aviv 61575, Israel


Exhibit 10.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on:
(a) Form S-8 (333-94995)  pertaining to the 1996 CSI Stock Option Plan, the 1999
Section 3(i) Share Option Plan,  the 1999 Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan and the
1999  Non-Employee  Directors Stock Option Plan of Commtouch  Software Ltd.; (b)
Form F-3  (333-89773)  pertaining to the resale of 2,052,051  ordinary shares of
Commtouch  Software Ltd. by Vulcan Ventures  Incorporated,  InfoSpace  (formerly
"Go2Net,  Inc.")  and  Microsoft  Corporation  and  a  warrant  exercisable  for
1,136,000 ordinary shares of Commtouch Software Ltd. by InfoSpace;  (c) Form F-3
(333-46192)  pertaining  to the sale by Commtouch  Software Ltd. of 4,000,000 of
its ordinary  shares;  (d) Form S-8 (333-65532)  pertaining to the 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, the 1999  Non-Employee  Directors Stock Option Plan and the
Wingra  Technologies,  LLC 1998  Unit  Option  Plan;  (e)  Form F-3  (333-68248)
pertaining to the resale of 1,406,612 ordinary shares of Commtouch Software Ltd.
by investors in Wingra;  and (f) Form F-3 (333-88248)  pertaining to the sale by
Commtouch Software Ltd. of 7,096,886 of its ordinary shares, of our report dated
February  27, 2003 with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Commtouch  Software Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2002.





                                          Yours truly,
Tel-Aviv, Israel                     KOST, FORER and GABBAY
July 15, 2003                   A Member of Ernst & Young Global
Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.t 371 E STREET t CHULA VISTA t CALIFORNIA 91910-2615t t TELEPHONE (858) 722-5953 t FAX (858) 408-2695 t FAX (858) 764-5480t E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.comt



August 31, 2007



To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of our report of August 30, 2007 on the audited financial statements of Business.vn, Inc. (formerly WorldTradeShow.com, Inc.) as of April 30, 2007, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.







Very Truly Yours,





/s/ Chang Park































Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants
Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Andrew K. Moller,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Christopher & BanksCorporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The quarterly reportof the Company on Form 10-Q****for the periodended September 1, 2007 as filed with the United States Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended;  and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: October 11, 2007 |   |                                                                      |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                      |
|                   | By:    | /s/ Andrew K. Moller                                                      |   |
|                   |   | Andrew K. Moller *Executive Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations
Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to
my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda
Telephone Corp.

Date: March 26, 2004


                                       /s/ Robert Boeckman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Boeckman, Chief Operations Officer
                                       and Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                       E-4
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.25


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers




Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of Synovus Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2018, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:


	
					
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Name
	Title
	Base Salary

	 
	 
	 

	Kessel D. Stelling
	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
	$
	1,125,000
	 

	Kevin S. Blair
	Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer
	615,825
	 

	Allen J. Gula, Jr.
	Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer, Retired
	477,877
	 

	J. Barton Singleton
	Executive Vice President and President, Financial Management Service
	443,128
	 

	Mark G. Holladay
	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer
	390,383
Michael Shawn O'BRIEN, as curator of the estate Michael J.P. O'Brien, Appellant, v. COMFORT LINE PRODUCTS, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1274

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel B. JACOBS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6145

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Samuel B. Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Brian James Samuels, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*151PER CURIAM:

Samuel B. Jacobs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jacobs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
John HACKIMER, Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 4D17-331

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Kenneth Wayne WATFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-6810

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

*814Kenneth Wayne Watford, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Wayne Watford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for the return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         457,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,770,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                   762,143
<INVENTORY>                                     99,263
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,553,749
<PP&E>                                      12,241,217
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,332,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,051,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,439,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     77,500
<COMMON>                                        92,329
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,505,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,051,355
<SALES>                                      9,411,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,411,110
<CGS>                                        6,938,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,938,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,203,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
KPMG (LOGO)

99 High Street
Boston, MA 02110-2371
Telephone 617 988 1000
Fax 617 988 0800


Independent Accountants' Report on
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

The Board of Directors
Plymouth Savings Bank:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about  Plymouth  Savings  Bank's (the
"Bank")  compliance  with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage  Bankers as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management is  responsible  for the Bank's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on management's  assertion about the Bank's  compliance based
on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the minimum
servicing  standards  and  performing  such other  procedures  as we  considered
necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  the Bank  has  complied  in all
material respects with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


KPMG LLP

January 27, 2000
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00384-CR

SAMUEL ALAN TUCKER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27,546

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing. 

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is granted by the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4,

9.2(c)(4), 49, and 49.8.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied by the Court.

PER CURIAM
Tucker v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motions granted and denied

Order issued and filed January 9, 2019
EX PARTE Jimmy D. MCKLEROY

1160319 (CR-15-1271)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.