alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Golden Health Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Hoi-ho Kiu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Maggie Kwok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented andthe consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

 
|   | /s/ Hoi-ho Kiu          |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Hoi-ho Kiu              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | December 18, 2005       |

 

 
|   | /s/ Maggie Kwok         |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Maggie Kwok             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | December 18, 2005       |

 

----
Errol P. CROSSDALE, as trustee of the KCKC Financial Living Trust, Appellant, v. Michael A. CROSSDALE, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4254

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018.

Walter Bell, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Mark A. Ebelini of Knott Ebelini Hart, Fort Myers, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
#### James Odis SOWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joshua WALSH, Defendant-Appellee, and Amanda Craig; James P. Dornfried, Defendants.

No. 17-6083

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 26, 2017

James Odis Sowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Martin Rehberg, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Odis Sowell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Joshua Walsh’s summary judgment motion, and deny Sowell’s summary judgment motion in Sowell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have considered Sowell’s arguments on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Sowell v. Walsh,*No. 1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Exhibit
23.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board
of Directors


Pacific
Continental Corporation and Subsidiary








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Pacific Continental Corporation and Subsidiary (Pacific Continental Corporation)
of our report dated March 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Pacific Continental Corporation as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008, and of our same report, with respect to Pacific
Continental Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-K
of Pacific Continental Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2008.














Portland,
Oregon


March 12,
2009
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 24, 2011 

# Order

August 24, 2011

141741(59)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 141741 v COA: 280073 Kent CC: 01-008625-FC RAMON LEE BRYANT, Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ____________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension to August 10, 2011 of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIRD
QUARTER 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,468
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (240)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,452
<PP&E>                                           2,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,339)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,874
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,448
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,757
<SALES>                                            714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,217
<CGS>                                            1,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
Marzuq AL-HAKIM, Appellant/Petitioner(s),

Julie L. JONES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.:2D18-1472

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 03, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appeal 2D18-1472 is dismissed as duplicative of 2D18-1279. Appellant's motion to consolidate is denied as moot.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Eddie J. ANGLIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4723

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2018

Eddie J. Anglin, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Ray, Bilbrey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Rodney Carter, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Christopher &Banks Corporation (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q****for the period ended May 29, 2010 as filed with theUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  July 8, 2010 |     |                                                                      |
|--------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |     |                                                                      |
|                     | By:      | /s/  Rodney Carter                                                        |
|                     | * * | Rodney  Carter 

*Executive  Vice President,*

*Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rick P. Frier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Rick P. Frier                           
|Rick P.Frier                                
|Executive Vice President and                
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

August 8, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0720

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

PAUL LEONARD BEAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 23, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2020

08/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0720
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6073 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6073

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ``Sergeant 
          Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER DAVID FITZGERALD POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### David Robert BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. GLYNN, in his capacity as Doctor and Chief Medical Officer (CMO); et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-56533

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*250Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 17, 2017

David Robert Bell, Pro Se

Jon S. Tangonan, Esquire, AGCA—Of-fice of the Attorney General (San Diego), San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bell’s request for oral argument, set forth in his reply brief, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner David Robert Bell appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Furnace v. Sullivan,*705 F.3d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bell failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants knew of and disregarded an excessive' risk to Bell’s health. *See Toguchi v. Chung,*391 F.3d 1051, 1057-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion regarding diagnosing or treating a medical condition does not violate a prisoner’s Eighth Amendment rights).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Bell’s requests to file a late and oversized reply brief (Docket Entry Nos. 20 and 21) are granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 18.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Steven T. HUMPHREY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Jonathon BURTON, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0611

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 17, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for belated appeal of the denial of petitioner's postconviction motion after evidentiary hearing, order dated May 18, 2017, is granted in circuit court case number 11-CF-20226. This order shall serve as a notice of appeal for purposes of calculating the time standards of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Within twenty days the trial court shall consider appellant's eligibility for appointment of appellate counsel, provided appellant files within ten days a motion in the circuit court requesting same accompanied by a financial affidavit, and shall enter an order thereupon, with a copy to appellant and a copy to this court. This ten-day time limit shall not limit the trial court's authority to provide counsel to appellant.

The circuit court clerk shall treat this order as a notice of appeal, promptly certify same and return it to this court as with any notice of appeal, and a new appellate case number will be assigned to this appeal and an acknowledgment letter will issue at that time.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
R.S., a Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1155

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

May, Ciklin and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
200 Southwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77027
P.O. Box 2824, Houston, Texas 77252-2824
713/543-8675, 800/288-3223


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

(LOGO) BANK UNITED


RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:


A. I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
   preceding  fiscal  year  under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
   Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and
   to the best of these Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
   its duties, responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout
   such  year,  or if there has been a default or  failure  of the  servicer  to
   perform any of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of
   each default or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported
   to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

B. I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
   servicer in good standing;

C. I have confirmed  that the Fidelity Bond, The Errors and Omissions  Insurance
   Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing
   Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
   Seller/Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

D. All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance  Policy (if
   applicable)  and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
   respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that  all such
   insurance policies are in full force and effect;

E. All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any  other  expenses
   accrued and due,  that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
   any Mortgaged Property,  have been paid or if any such costs or expenses have
   not been paid with  respect  to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for the
   non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

F. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

G. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
   required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue  Code,
   respectively, have been prepared and filed.



Certified By:
Tyrone W. Crawley

Vice President
Title

7/6/00
Date
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6025 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 to eliminate 

the repatriation loan program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. MCGOVERN) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 

1956 to eliminate the repatriation loan program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Leave No Americans 

5 Behind Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REPATRIATION LOANS BY DE7 PARTMENT OF STATE. 

8 Section 4 of the State Department Basic Authorities 

9 Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2671) is amended— 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6025 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘, on 

2 a reimbursable basis to the maximum extent prac3 ticable, with such reimbursements to be credited to 

4 the applicable Department of State appropriation 

5 and to remain available until expended, except that 

6 no reimbursement under this clause shall be paid 

7 that is greater than the amount the person evacu8 ated would have been charged for a reasonable com9 mercial air fare immediately prior to the events giv10 ing rise to the evacuation’’; and 

11 (2) by striking subsection (d). 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Stacy BELLOWS, Appellant, v. Sean BELLOWS, Appellee.

No. 4D17-537

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 9, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Michael D. Capellas, the Chief
Executive Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Capellas
|                   |  |  |  | Michael D. Capellas    
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Travis Dean RENDON, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-11729 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 18, 2017

*322James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S, Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Travis Dean Rendon, Pro Se

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Travis Dean Rendon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Rendon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*6th Cib. R. 42.2,

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
William Randall BURNETTE v. STATE

CR-16-0314

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.