alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Natural Gas Services Group, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Omitted;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen C. TaylorStephen C. Taylor, Chairman of
the Board of Directors, Chief
Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Ariba, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117437, 333-107864, 333-61064, 333-73458, 333-81773, 333-89119, 333-95665, 333-33544, 333-46820, and 333-84916) of Ariba, Inc. of our reports dated November 27, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Ariba, Inc., Ariba, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ariba, Inc., includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

November 27, 2006
A.W. v. ST. CLAIR COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES

2160142

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen Fitzgerald PITTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

t0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148049

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148049

COA: 314599

Genesee CC: 11

- 029317

- FC

DELONNIE DEKINO JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 9, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** May 18, 2015
N o. 04

- 15

- 00107

- CV
Justin V. HAYNES , Appellant

v. Alicia Bryan HAYNES , Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Cou rt No. 2012

- CI

- 14023 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER The reporter’s record for this appeal was due to be filed on April 2, 2015. On April 28 , 2015, this Court issued an order requiring that the reporter’s record be filed on or before Ma y 28, 2015 . On May 13, 2015 court report er Luis Duran filed a notice of late record seeking a nother 45

- day extension to July 13, 2015

. Th is Court may not grant an extension of time for more than 3 0 days. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.3(c)

. The remaining reporter’s record to be filed is not extensive.
It i s therefore ORDERED that Luis Duran file the reporter’s record in this court no later than June 15, 2015

. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE RECORD ARE DISFAVORED

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of Dino Alexander, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[771 NYS2d 207]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. The misbehavior report, the positive test results and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Gonzalez v Selsky,*301 AD2d 1019, 1019-1020 [2003]). Contrary to petitioner’s claim of hearing officer bias, the record discloses that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner *(see Matter of Wilson v Selsky,*287 AD2d 847 [2001]). The Hearing Officer considered petitioner’s defense that the four poppy seed bagels petitioner claimed to have eaten could have caused a false positive. The conflicting testimony from the correction officer who denied that she provided petitioner with bagels and from the representative of the SYVA corporation indicating that, although poppy seeds could cause a false positive, petitioner consumed only a small amount, presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to evaluate and resolve *(see Matter of Gonzalez v Selsky, supra*at 1020; *Matter of Goodwine v Selsky,*299 AD2d 782, 782-783 [2002]). To the extent that petitioner claims that he was denied the right to present a witness, the record establishes that the testimony of the witness requested would be irrelevant to the drug use charge *(see Matter of Hynes v Goord,*305 AD2d 829, 830 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 510 [2003]; *Matter of Loper v McGinnis,*295 AD2d 777, 778 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Option Care, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, Rajat Rai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and PaulMastrapa, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best ofour knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) that:     (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: May 10, 2007 By:  /s/ Rajat Rai    Rajat Rai    Chief Executive Officer      Date: May 10, 2007 By:  /s/ Paul Mastrapa    Paul Mastrapa    Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 26, 1999 AND
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                           7,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,161)
<INVENTORY>                                     76,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,396
<PP&E>                                         884,285
<DEPRECIATION>                               (365,129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 705,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,834
<BONDS>                                        233,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,647
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   705,626
<SALES>                                        346,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,651
<CGS>                                          346,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (59,741)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,957)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.14)


</TABLE>
#### Daljit SINGH, Petitioner v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. Attorney General, Respondent

No. 16-60676 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 29, 2017

Malvern Clopton Burnett, Law Offices of Malvern C. Burnett, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner

Rebecca Ariel Hoffberg Phillips, Esq., Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before BENAVIDES, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daljit Singh, a native and citizen of India who entered the United States without admission or parole, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). With respect to his asylum and withholding-of-removal claims, Singh challenges the immigration judge’s finding that his testimony was not credible, but he fails to show that it is plain from the totality of the circumstances that “no reasonable fact-finder could make such an adverse credibility ruling.” *Wang v. Holder,*569 F.3d 531, 538 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The BIA found it unnecessary to review the merits of his claims apart from the adverse credibility finding, which was fatal to the claims. Likewise, we conclude that the denial of relief turned on the assessment of Singh’s credibility. *See Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78-79 (5th Cir. 1994).

■In addition, Singh challenges the adverse credibility determination in the con*202text of his OAT claim. Again, he has not shown that “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); *see Zhang v. Gonzales,*432 F.3d 339, 344-45 (5th Cir. 2005).

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Ronnie A. FORD, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2871

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
| (1)   | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Skinvisible, Inc. for the year ended                December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Skinvisible,                Inc.. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Terry Howlett                                                             |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Terry                Howlett                                                                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  April                2, 2007                                                                       |
EX PARTE Tyrone TRIPLETT

CR-16-0263

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 5, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1532 

To require a review of the effects of FHA mortgage insurance policies, 

practices, and products on small-dollar mortgage lending, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Ms. TLAIB introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require a review of the effects of FHA mortgage insurance policies, practices, and products on small-dollar 

mortgage lending, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving FHA Sup5 port for Small-Dollar Mortgages Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF FHA SMALL-DOLLAR MORTGAGE PRAC7 TICES. 

8 (a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds 

9 that— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1532 IH

1 (1) affordable homeownership opportunities are 

2 being hindered due to the lack of financing available 

3 for home purchases under $70,000; 

4 (2) according to the Urban Institute, small-dol5 lar mortgage loan applications in 2017 were denied 

6 by lenders at double the rate of denial for large 

7 mortgage loans, and this difference in denial rates 

8 cannot be fully explained by differences in the appli9 cants’ credit profiles; 

10 (3) according to data compiled by Attom Data 

11 solutions, small-dollar mortgage originations have 

12 decreased 38 percent since 2009, while there has 

13 been a 65-percent increase in origination of mort14 gages for more than $150,000; 

15 (4) the FHA’s mission is to serve creditworthy 

16 borrowers who are underserved and, according to the 

17 Urban Institute, the FHA serves 24 percent of the 

18 overall market, but only 19 percent of the small-dol19 lar mortgage market; and 

20 (5) the causes behind these variations are not 

21 fully understood, but merit study that could assist in 

22 furthering the Department of Housing and Urban 

23 Development’s mission, including meeting the hous24 ing needs of borrowers the program is designed to 

25 serve and reducing barriers to homeownership, while 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1532 IH

1 protecting the solvency of the Mutual Mortgage In2 surance Fund. 

3 (b) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Housing and Urban 

4 Development shall conduct a review of its FHA single5 family mortgage insurance policies, practices, and prod6 ucts to identify any barriers or impediments to supporting, 

7 facilitating, and making available mortgage insurance for 

8 mortgages having an original principal obligation of 

9 $70,000 or less. Not later than the expiration of the 12- 

10 month period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

11 this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to the Con12 gress describing the findings of such review and the ac13 tions that the Secretary will take, without adversely affect14 ing the solvency of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, 

15 to remove such barriers and impediments to providing 

16 mortgage insurance for such mortgages. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
H. R. 6073 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9925 Bustleton 

Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER DAVID FITZGERALD POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

David Fitzgerald Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Troy MARTIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 21, 2017

Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's order dated November 1, 2017, and with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and LUCK, JJ., concur.
#### NATURAL FASHIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BEST OF KASHMIR, AKA BOK, AKA BOK Style; et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 16-15825

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 17, 2017

Samuel L. Emerson, Best Best & Krieger LLP, Sacramento, CA, Gillett Henry Welles, Esquire, Attorney, Best Best *&.*

Krieger LLP, Indian Wells, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Shah Nawaz Farash, Pro Se

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decisioñ without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants Shah Nawaz Farash, Shanu, and Best of Kashmir appeal pro se from the district court’s order denying their motion to set aside entry of default in this copyright infringement action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to set aside entry of default under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(e). *Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Restaurants Grp., Inc.,*375 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

In their opening brief, appellants failed to challenge any of the district court’s grounds for denying their motion to set aside entry of default, and therefore appellants have waived any such challenge. *See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington,*350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); *Smith v. Marsh,*194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”). We therefore do not reach the merits of this case.

To the extent that Best of Kashmir is a business entity and not an assumed name for Shah Nawaz Farash, we dismiss Best of Kashmir’s appeal because Farash, a non-attorney, may not represent a business entity. *See United States v. High Country Broad. Co.,*3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th *261Cir. 1993) (“A corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel.”); *C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States,*818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (“Although a non-attorney may appear *in propria persona*in his own behalf, that privilege is personal to him. He has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.” (citations omitted)).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Appellants’ request for an order requiring the parties to submit fabric samples, set forth in the opening brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Raonel Valdez VALHUERDIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0315

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 26, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8