Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 7801 

1See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016). 

1See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 43522 

(August 9, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2Commerce has previously determined that 

Interpipe Europe S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC 

(Interpipe Ukraine); PJSC Interpipe 

Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (Interpipe 

NTRP); and LLC Interpipe Niko Tube (Niko Tube) 

are affiliated and treated as a single entity (i.e., 

Interpipe). See Preliminary Results PDM at 

‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing.’’ 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil 

Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2019–2020,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

4See Termination of the Suspension Agreement 

on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from 

Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and 

Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 

(July 16, 2019) (Order). 

others cash deposit rate for ‘‘all other 

producers or exporters’’ is 6.05 percent. 

In the Federal Register of October 6, 

2020, in the FR Doc 2020–22053 on 

page 63081, in the first column, correct 

the all-others cash deposit rate for ‘‘all 

other producers or exporters’’ in the first 

paragraph under the ‘‘Cash Deposit 

Requirements’’ section. The correct allothers cash deposit rate for ‘‘all other 

producers or exporters’’ is 6.05 percent. 

Background 

On July 9, 2019, August 5, 2019, and 

October 6, 2020, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register notices of the 

final results of the 2016–2017 

administrative review, the amended 

final results of the 2016–2017 

administrative review, and the final 

results of the 2017–2018 administrative 

review, respectively. We incorrectly 

identified the cash deposit rate for all 

others (i.e., ‘‘for all other producers or 

exporters’’) as 5.55 percent. The correct 

all-others cash deposit rate applicable 

during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 

periods of review did not change from 

the rate that was established in the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation and 

the antidumping duty order. In the 

LTFV investigation, Commerce 

established a 6.05 percent cash deposit 

rate for all others (i.e., ‘‘for all other 

producers or exporters’’) as published in 

the antidumping duty order.1 We hereby 

notify the public that Commerce should 

have identified the all-others cash 

deposit rate as 6.05 percent in the 

above-referenced determinations. We 

intend to notify U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection of these corrections. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: February 4, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02852 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–823–815] 

Oil Country Tubular Goods From 

Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the sole 

producer/exporter sold subject 

merchandise in the United State at 

prices below normal value during the 

July 10, 2019, through June 30, 2020, 

period of review (POR). 

DATES: Applicable February 10, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni 

Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 9, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties, including mandatory 

respondent Interpipe,2 to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. For a 

description of the events since the 

Preliminary Results, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for these final results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.3 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by the Order 

are certain oil country tubular goods 

(OCTG) from Ukraine. For a full 

description of the scope, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of these issues is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

calculation of the preliminary weightedaverage dumping margin for Interpipe. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this administrative 

review, we determine the following 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the period July 10, 2019, through June 

30, 2020: 

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Interpipe Europe S.A./Interpipe Ukraine LLC/PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (aka Interpipe NTRP)/LLC 

Interpipe Niko Tube ...................................................................................................................................................................... 27.80 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
7802 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 28 / Thursday, February 10, 2022 / Notices 

5See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

6See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 7See Order, 84 FR at 33919. 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these final results within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review.5 In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce calculated an importerspecific ad valorem antidumping 

assessment rate for Interpipe that is not 

zero or de minimis and will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Interpipe for which it did 

not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.6

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Interpipe will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter was not 

a firm covered in this review or in the 

investigation but the producer was 

covered, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be the all-others rate of 7.47 percent, the 

all-others rate established in the original 

less-than-fair-value investigation.7

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 4, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce 

Incorrectly Added Certain U.S. Direct 

Selling Expenses to Normal Value 

Comment 2: Whether to Grant Interpipe a 

Constructed Export Price (CEP) Offset 

Comment 3: Whether to Treat Section 232 

Tariffs as U.S. Customs Duties 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct the CONNUM Field Used as the 

Basis for the Margin Calculation 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Sales of Current Assets in the 

Calculation of General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expenses 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Make an Adjustment to Interpipe’s 

Reported Depreciation 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise Niko Tube’s G&A Expense Ratio 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02856 Filed 2–9–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XB748] 

Pacific Fishery Management Council; 

Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: Drs. Chris Harvey and Toby 

Garfield of NMFS will provide a briefing 

on the 2022 California Current 

Integrated Ecosystem Assessment 

(CCIEA) Ecosystem Status Report to 

interested Pacific Fishery Management 

Council (Pacific Council) members, 

advisory body members, and the public. 

DATES: The online briefing will be held 

Wednesday, March 2, 2022, from 1 p.m. 

to 3 p.m., Pacific Standard Time, or 

until discussion is finished. 

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held 

online. Specific meeting information, 

including directions on how to join the 

meeting and system requirements will 

be provided in the meeting 

announcement on the Pacific Council’s 

website (see www.pcouncil.org). You 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1