OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

8) ll-E-26 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/2008 11:12:44 AM Sheet 8 of 86 

p.1 
T P.2 

RADIAN A-90-19 

MEETING NOTES 

I r? ' -

0 FROM: Bennett King, Radian !:p]r_LJ«I,J.^ 

TO: Jan Meyer, EPA/SDB |'r' | QJ:Q | 3 ^ 

DATE: September 14, 1992 ' 

REVIEWER: Julie Anne Probert, Radian '-•--

SUBJECT: Meeting Notes for June 11, 1991 with members of 

the Chemical Manufacturers Association 

ATTENDEES: See Attachment 1 

INTRODUCTION 

The suggested agenda for this meeting is included as 

Attachment 2. One item was added to this suggested agenda: 

polycyclic organic material (POM). These meeting notes.present 

the highlights of the discussion in the order presented on the. 

agenda. 

1.0 SOURCE CATEGORY ISSUES 

The discussion under this topic centered on the possibility 

of a phased implementation of the Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON). 

The Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) had prepared a 

phase-in plan and provided it prior to the meeting (see 

Attachment 3). In general, the CMA's proposal called for the 

list of SOCMI production processes to be separated into three 

groups according to toxicity. Those groups would be subject to 

the requirements of the HON according to the following schedule: 

Group 1: date of promulgation 

Group 2: 2 years after date of promulgation 

Group 3: 5 years after date of promulgation 

Thus, as part of the phase-in proposal, the CMA proposed 

extending the compliance time beyond three years after 

promulgation. Representatives of the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) felt this was not permissible under the Clean Air 

klj-183 

CMAmtg.nt 
P.3 

Act Amendments (CAAA) but would confirm their interpretation with 

the Office of General Council (OGC). 

The CMA also suggested tying the compliance schedule to the 

permitting process. In doing so, delays caused by the permitting 

process would not be considered part of the 3-year compliance 

time. The CMA also provided an example illustrating the time and 

steps involved in designing and building an incinerator (see 

Attachment 4) to support their claim that the 3-year compliance 

time is insufficient. 

2.0 MAXIMUM ACHIEVABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACT) ISSUES 

2.1 Performance Testing Alternatives 

The CMA expressed a preference that the HON not restrict 

sources to a specific type of test method, but rather allow the 

use of any approved EPA method. This discussion centered around 

EPA Methods 18 and 25A for measuring the concentration of organic 

compounds. As part of addressing this issue, representatives 

from the EPA's Emissions Measurement Branch requested data from 

the CMA that would compare results for Method 25A to Method 18. 

2.2 Applicability/Scope of HON 

The discussion centered on how a source would determine 

whether or not they were subject to the HON. Currently, a source 

is subject to the HON if it produces one or more chemicals on a 

list of approximately 390. The EPA may publish this list, or it 

may publish the list of all SOCMI chemicals (approximately 660) 

and designate the criteria used to determine whether or not a 

source is subject (i.e., the use of hazardous air pollutants 

[HAP's] as raw materials or the production of HAP's). The CMA 

indicated that their concern with the current applicability 

definition lay in the words "production" and "product." 

Depending on how this was defined, the scope of the HON could 

vary significantly. The EPA indicated it was their intent to 

define these terms and include the caveats necessary to clearly 

indicate what was meant to be included within the scope of the 

HON. 

klj-183 

CMAmtg.nt 
P.4 

2.3 Applicability/De Minimis Criteria 

The specific applicability criteria for each type of 

emission point and any associated de minimis criteria were 

discussed. The EPA stated that criteria similar to that from 

past rules (e.g., tank capacity and vapor pressure for storage 

tanks) would be used. Further, the EPA was still considering 

whether to develop de minimis criteria for each type of emission 

point. 

2.4 Applicability Based on Total Organic Compound (TOC) vs. HAP 

and Multi-Media Impacts 

Neither of these issues were discussed in depth. The CMA 

mentioned that they were concerned about these issues, and the 

EPA responded that they were being considered. 

2.5 Preliminary Results of Regulatory Analysis 

The CMA expressed an interest in seeing the preliminary 

results of the EPA's analysis. The EPA agreed to send the CMA 

copies of the draft regulatory alternative tables which show the 

impacts of the regulatory alternatives being evaluated. Further, 

the EPA agreed to consider providing a draft copy of the 

regulation and preamble. 

3.0 POLYCYCLIC ORGANIC MATTER 

The chemical family of POM appears on the CAAA list of 

HAP's. The CMA expressed concern over how the presence of POM in 

an emission stream would affect a source. Would the presence of 

a POM formed as part of a combustion process make a source 

subject to the HON? The EPA stated that this was not their 

intent. Rather, the HON would only affect processes producing 

SOCMI chemicals. 

klJ-183 

CMAmtg.nt 
P.5 

Attachment 1 

CMA MEETING - 6/11/92 

Bennett King 

Lori Lay 

Gary McAlister 

Gil Wood 

Linda Chaput 

David Gustafson 

Kathy Bailey 

Nancy Cookson 

Bob Rosensteel 

Leslie Evans 

Laszlo Takacs 

Alex Turchina 

Bruce Wallington 

Jan Meyer 

Richard Sigman 

W.C. Holbrook 

D.P. Anderson 

Liz Fisher 

Joe Hovious 

Kim Boudreaux 

Mel Keener 

Radian 

EPA/EMB 

EPA/EMB 

EPA/EMB 

EPA/SDB 

DOW 

CMA 

CMA 

EPA 

EPA 

Oxy Chem 

Procter & Gamble 

Merck & Co. 

EPA/SDB 

CMA 

BF Goodrich 

First Chemical 

Rohm and Haas 

Union Carbide 

Ethyl Corp. 

BP 

919-541-9100 

919-541-4825 

919-541-1062 

919-541-5544 

919-541-5358 

517-636-2953 

202-887-1186 

202-887-1241 

919-541-5608 

919-541-5410 

716-286-3103 

513-634-7161 

908-302-7815 

919-541-5254 

202-887-1313 

216-447-7925 

601-938-2227 

215-592-2545 

203-794-5183 

504-388-7776 

202-785-4888 

klJ-183 

CMAmtg.nt 
P.6 

Attachment 2 

Suggested Agenda for 6/11/91 Meeting Between CMA and EPA 

1. Source Category Issues 

-. Federal Register Notice on Source Category List 

- CMA Recommendations for Phased-in Compliance Schedule 

2. MACT Issues 

- Performance Testing Alternatives 

- Applicability/Scope of HON 

- Applicability/De Minimis Criteria 

- TOC vs. HAP: Basis for Determining Applicability and/or 

Compliance 

- Consideration of Multi-media Impacts in Setting MACT 

- Discuss Preliminary Results of EPA's Regulatory Analysis for 

Hazardous Organic NESHAP 
P.7 

Attachment 3 

CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 

May 28, 1991 

Dr. Jane t Meyer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Standards Development Branch (MD-13) 

Research Triangl e Park, NC 27711 

Dear Dr. Meyer: 

On behalf of the Chemical Manufacturers Association's (CMA) Air 

Toxics Work Group, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to 

meet with you and other representatives of EPA on February 28, 1991 and 

March 13, 1991 to discuss the Maximum Achievable Control Technology 

(MACT) Standards for the Synthetic Organic Chenlcal Manufacturing 

Industry (SOCMI). 

As a follow-up to the February 28 meeting, the Air Toxics Work 

Group has continued to evaluate the need for a phased-in MACT 

compliance schedule for SOCMI subcategories and has developed a 

phase-in approach that we. believe vould be most aligned with 

Congressional intent for phasing l.:t the MACT regulations, EPA's neod to 

promulgate regulations in an efficient manner, and industry's need to 

be able to meet the mandated compliance schedules. Enclosed is a 

doscripbion of CMA's recommended phase-in approach and a discussion of 

why this approach will help to alleviate the potential problems 

associated with a single compliance schedule for all SOCMI 

subcategories. 

We look forward to meeting with you to discuss our recommendation 

on June 11, 1991. If you have any questions, please feel free to call 

me at (202) 887-1313. 

Sincerely, 

Richard Sigman 

Associate Director 

Air Programs 

Enclosure 

cc: Robert Rosensteel 

Susan Wyatt 

2501 M Street, NW, Washington. DC 20037 202-887-1100 Telex 89617 (CMA WSH) 
P.8 

CMA Recommendation for Phasing In MACT Standards 

for SOCMI Subcategories 

Introduction 

In a letter dated January 3, 1991 from Richard Sigman of CMA to 

Robert Rosensteel of EPA, CMA described its concern that member 

companies may be unable to meet the three-year MACT compliance time 

frame if MACT standards are applied to all SOCMI processes at one time. 

In the letter, CMA reported the results of a survey of a limited number 

of CMA member companies which forecasted a four-to-five-fold increase 

in annual demand for control equipment if MACT standards are applied to 

all SOCMI processes within two years of enactment. CMA expects an even 

higher increase in demand for control equipment when equipment 

requirements resulting from other Clean Air Act programs, e.g., Title 

I, and other company voluntary programs are taken into account. As a 

result, CMA questioned the ability of the SOCMI to meet the proposed 

compliance deadline. 

In addition, the letter noted CMA's concern that the construction 

permit demand created by such a broad application of MACT standards 

could potentially overload the permitting system at the Federal, State, 

and local levels at a time when States are developing and implementing 

new operating permit programs. 

Congressional Direction for Phase In of MACT Standards for SOCMI 

Subcategories 

Both the House Committee Report and the Explanatory Statement 

accompanying the Conference Report include statements that support 

CMA's position on the phase-in of MACT standards for SOCMI. 

First, the U.S. Congress Joint Explanatory Statement of the 

Committee of Conference, dated October 26, 1990, addresses the schedule 

for promulgating MACT standards. The Conference Committee states on 

page 338 of their Report, "MACT standards for 40 source categories 

shall be promulgated not later that 2 years after the date of 

enactment, tn selecting categories for standards in this group, the 

Administrator shall, at the Administrator's discretion, pick the 

priority elements of the hazardous organic NESHAP which is under 

development" (emphasis added). Later on the same page, the conferees 

state, "[t]he conferees wish to emphasize that in promulgating 

standards, the EPA should devote its resources first to those 

pollutants which present.the greatest risk to the public health and the 

environment." 

The significance of this Statement is enhanced and made clear in a 

discussion of that Statement by Congressman Dingell, in which he 

stated, "[i]t is important to stress once again that the statement of 

managers as printed in the conference report represents the views of 

all the managers or conferees from the House and Senate who signed the 

conference report... .. . In genet al, we believe that the legislation 
P.9 

speaks for itself and, where it was necessary to make, comments, the 

conference report includes specific statements agreed upon by all the 

conferees or managers" (emphasis added). 

Congressman Dingell goes on to state, "I presume that some 

individual conferees in the House and in the Senate may want to express 

views relative to the legislation and to offer various interpretations. 

That is their right, and I applaud that. However, I want to make it 

clear that only the statement of managers, which is part of the 

conference report, reflects the views of all the managers or conferees 

in the House and Senate. To the extent that the managers' statement 

is silent regarding specific provisions and titles, that is a 

deliberate decision on the part of all the managers who signed the 

conference agreement. Silence should not be given a different meaning" 

(emphasis added). 

Based on the foregoing, CMA concludes that all of the managers and 

conferees who crafted the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 instructed 

the Administrator to use his discretion to pick priority elements of 

the hazardous organic NESHAP, then under development by EPA, for 

inclusion in the 41 source categories for which MACT would be 

promulgated by November 1992. 

The Joint Statement is consistent with expectations expressed by 

the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce on page 

329 of their report on HR 3030, dated May 17, 1990. The report states, 

"[t]he Committee would expect EPA to phase-in MACT standards to allow 

sources subject to those standards to allocate their resources in the 

most effective way." The Report goes on to identify factors EPA should 

take into account in prioritizing and scheduling MACT standards. 

Recommended Phase-In Approach 

CMA recommends a phase-in approach for SOCMI MACT regulations with 

the following features: 

1) The approximately 388 subcategories within SOCMI should be 

classified into three groups, using a similar approach to 

that taken during the regulatory negotiations for equipment 

leaks to group affected processes. Basically, this approach 

grouped the list of hazardous air pollutants into five groups 

according to toxicity. Production processes that produce or 

use as a reactant any of the most toxic hazardous air 

pollutants were placed into Group 1 with the earliest 

applicability and compliance dates. Likewise, production 

processes that produce or use as a reactant any of the next 

most toxic hazardous air pollutants that were not already 

designated in Group 1 were placed into Group 2 and so on. It 

may be necessary to adjust the hazardous air pollutant 

ranking performed under the regulatory negotiations to take 

into account recent work by the Agency on high-risk 

pollutants. 
1 

cn H 

o 

c TJ 

u> 

U l 

v< 

CD 

» ri 

CO 

SB 

i-h 

it 

CD 

I-l 

O. 

CD 

r t 

(0 

o 

r h 

t i 

i-l 

o 3 

G 

H -

OQ 

» rr 

HO 

3 

1 

Cl 

. 

o 

c T3 

to 

1 

N> 

v< 

CD 

CD 

rl 

CO 

0> 

l-h 

rt 

CD 

1 

I 

Cl 

1 

o 

c T3 

i-" 

a IB 

rt 

CD 

o 

r h 

TJ 

ri 

O 

3 

G 

1—" 

Q-OQ 

» rt 

(D 

O 

rh 

TJ 

I-l 

O 

3 

c H -

OQ 

a> 

r t 

H -

0 

3 

(D 

r t 

HO 

3 

cn 

•a a> 

o Htt> 

_<D . 

O 

3 

3> 

tS 

ri 

O 

•a 

A. O 

i-h 

0 

H 

rt 

XT 

9 

tt 

XT 

rt 

CD 

iD 

OQ 

1 

O 

_ 

•a H3 

OQ 

ca 

0 

rh 

CO 

o 

o 3 

i-l 

01 

c 

ar 

o 

a> 

rt 

<9 

OQ 

0 

11 

H -

a CO 

ca 

CD 

CO 

r t 

3 * 

CD 

r t 

r t 

XT 

(D 

*-h 

O 

-_ •—• 

o € 

H3 

OQ 

CD 

TJ 

TJ 

r-» 

1— 

O 

(D 

cr t-a-

>—a 

t-af t 

«<i 

a. 

» rt 

CD 

CO 

o* CD 

i-l 

c t-a 

CD 

3 

IB 

«H* -

3 

OQ 

P> 

3 

a. 

n0 

•o 3 * 

_ £> 

(D 

I 

L_ 

3 

O 

O 

3 

TJ 

>—a 

y -

y 

3 

O 

CD 

CD 

O 

n O 

' N 

» 

•a 

•a i—> 

•— 

o CD 

a-

!->• H -

Hrt 

>< 

a CD 

rt 

(D 

CO 

« Hrt 

3 * 

UL. 

3 

rt 

3 * 

CD 

3 * 

CD 

N 

CD 

. 

H 

3 * 

!-»• CO 

I—" 

IB 

3 

OQ 

C 

CD 

Oo 

CD 

H3 

a. Ko CD 

f t 

(3 

7! 

no 

"_ 

> 

CO — 

CD 

aha-

(—• 

Hf t 

C_v<j 

0 

c l/l 

O 

it 

O.0Q 

H -

3 

OQ 

H-* 

v< 

• 

a> 3 

h -

o 

z Pl 

CO 

X 

> • 

TJ 

f t 

o 

w (9 

rt 

ca 

CD 

TJ 

y 

I-l 

CD 

rt 

(9 

f t O CO 

ST O _ 

(B 

3 

O 

3 

CD 

•o 0 

CO 

CO 

(-•• 

a* t-a 

CD 

O 

O 

3 

-o 

r— 

H*-

CD 

3 

O 

CD 

aCB 

rt 

CD 

. 

3 T> 

rt «0 

CD 0 

a n TJ rt 

r-> CO 

CD 

H (B 

c •_ i_.>a 

CD r-> 

a •*• 

(B O 

W » 

H- cr 3 Hf t rtOQ H 

(D 3 * 

a . 0 

» 13 

3 * 

« 0 (B 

3 * CO 

CD (D 

CO 1 

CD 1-^ 

1 3 

H3 IB 

TJ 

CO TJ 

O rl 

XT O 

CD 0> 

a. o C 3 -

1 — • 

CD 

S O 

3 * <D 

CD H 

3 rt 

» rr H3 " 3 

CD i-> 

'-S << 

. i-l 

CD O 

i-h O 

CD 3 

•I OQ 

H H 

•CD <D 

O . CO 

CO 

rt 

O more 

• Hrt co 

3 * C 

H- cr cfl o 

CD 

1—• rt 

Q> CD 

3 OQ 

OQ 0 

CS r| 

(B V«J 

rt OQ 

v< 

H 

3* Q. 

CD CD 

rt 

r-a CD 

CD CO 

3 

CD C 

ts 

O 0 

0 3 

3 

r t T3 

(D r| 

3 0 

OQ rt TJ 3 

C O 

IB 

OQ a. CD Hl-h 

5 l-h 

O CD 

O H 

3 CD 

TJ 3 

i-a f t 

H-

» o 3 CD 

>-a C 

CD 1 — 

r t OQ 

CD CD 

co rt 

i--

Pl O 

T3 3 

> ICD 

P> 3 

r t 

3 * 

CD 

CO 

rt 

P> 

3 

a CD 

r| 

o. 

!->• Cfl 

CD 

»-h 

l-h 

CD 

O 

rt 

1-^ 

< CD 

i-h 

O 

H 

CB 

"O IQ.TJ 

"O 

1—a CD 

O rt >< "O 

CD CD 

OQ 

Q. O 

p> hi 

rt t-a. 

CD CD 

Cfl 

O 

r| C 

r>-

O. r t 

IB 3 * 

r t H -

CD 3 

CA 

:co 

r h Cfl 

C Hngl-

e 

rther 

i-' O 

3 i— 

OQ HO 

a CD 

H- cr i-h Hi-h i-" 

CD H-

. f t 

CD v< 

3 • 

f t 

(B 

ri 

3 

O 

rt 

CD 

i-h 

rn 

CD 

O 

rt 

H-

< CD 

rh 

0 

n 

y 

a—a 

t—• 

9i 

0 

r; 

11 

o CD 

Cfl 

C 

T3 

O 

3 

rt- O 

i-1-

O 

c H -

Q> 

H 

O 

CD 

r t 

CD 

OQ 

O 

H 

C_v«S 

I—" 

CD 

to 

H 

<-<5 

O 

H 

rl 

o 3 

G 

O;—Q * 

» rt 

y -

0 

3 

. 

50 

» rr er 3 - , 

H 

3 " 

CD 

i—" 

CB 

3 

OQ 

C 

IB 

OQ 

CD 

3 

CB 

3 

a. 

CB 

T3 

•T3 

t-a 

r>-

o 

p> 

o* 

l—a 

CD 

^ 

K3 

a. Ho CB 

r t 

CD 

CO 

r t 

XT 

& tt 

tt 

XT 

CD 

CO 

rt 

£ 3 

Q. 

rCD 

d is 

CO 

•3 

o* f j 

IB 

f t 

(D 

OQ 

o 

ri 

>fj 

. 

. 

. 3 

•—\ 

CD 

3 

t3 

CD 

CO 

ICD 

- rt X3 

CD 

CP 

t- 1 

HCO 

3 * 

CD 

o 0 

3 

T3 

I—• 

H0> 

3 

O 

CD 

3*IO . 

1» 

CO 

1 -^ 

01 

» Q. 

a. (D 

ya^ . 

. 

» r t 

CD 

O 

H 

a. P> 

r t 

CD 

CO 

i-h 

O 

ri 

CD 

_ n 3 * 

O 

CB 

r t 

CD 

OQ 

O 

r| 

v<S 

O 

1 1 

1 — ' 

HO 

IB 

cr i—• 

CD 

r t 

O 

01 

CO 

o 

c H 

o 9 

* 

. 

. 

. 

r t 

XT 

CD 

3> 

Q. 

3 

t-a. 

3 

Hca 

rt 

r| 

0> 

r t 

O 

rt 

CO 

XT 

y 

1 — ' 

1 — ' 

CO 

f t 

CD 

3 

pu 

CD 

1 

CU 

-

• 

• 

• 

•o H 

O 

3 

C 

i—' 

OQ 

B> 

*+ 

CD 

a. 

e 

3 

a. CD 

H 

r t 

XT 

Cf**-l 

ca 

CD 

O 

rt 

raO 

3 

CD 

3 

> Hr| 

> o f t 

ca 

rt 

0> 

rt 

CD 

Cfl 

v 

3 

»—» CD 

^_ rh 

rt 

O 

r| 

r t 

3 * 

CD 

CD 

i-h 

rh 

CD 

O 

rt 

r

1

-

C< D 

a. 

» i t 

CD 

o i-h 

CB 

3 

Q.<< J 

CD 

3 

w sio _. n 

3 * CO 

» f t 

N IB 

» OQ 

H OQ 

a . CD 

0 H 

c CO ffl 

T3 

O 13 

H HOQ H -

CD r> 

3 CD 

H- cr O H1 — • 

Z r^ 

P I rt 

CO v<J 

2C 

> a. 

t J CD 

• f+ 

CD 

CO 

CO 

CD CD 

O 3 

r t Q. 

Ko ia 

3 3" 

0 

H_ CO 

i—' CD 

|VJ 1 

/•> H-

- - 3 

v ^ 

'-> O 

C J O 

• ^ 3 

/-y. * 0 

3» h-

\-/ p . 

i& 

O 3 

r h O 

CD 

rt 

XT rh 

CD O 

r| the 

Clean 

o 

3 

> 

O* 

CD 

I—• 

HCD 

< CD 

Cfl 

rr 

3 * 

» rt 

rt 

XT 

!D 

y a 

y 

rt 

M 

e 

O» Q 

CD 

0 

rh 

r t 

3 * 

CD 

CO 

rt 

IB 

rt 

C 

rt 

CD 

CD 

(-• t—• 

O 

e CO 

p l 

T3 

> 

f t 

O 

O 

o 3 

T3 

t-a 

H -

ffl 

3 

O 

CD 

. 

H3 

CD 

CO 

H -

3 

OQ 

1—' 

CD 

H 

C 

H-» 

CD 

3 

IB 

;»r H -

3 

OQ 

S 

; y 

1-^ 

i—• 

CD 

T3 

11 

O 

<J 

KCL 

H -

3 

OQ 

-h 

O 

H 

T3 

3 * 

C» O 

CD 

a 1 

H -

3 

P l 

T l 

3 

CD 

> 0 Q 

rt 

0 

X) 

r| 

O 

3 

C 

i—• 

OQ 

CD 

0 

r t 

Hffl 

rt 

CD 

a. 

CD 

U3 

G 

H -

rt T3 

CD 

IB 

i—• 

i—• 

ffl 

CO 

tS 

CD 

O 

rt 

CO 

O 

i-h 

rt 

XT 

CD 

3 * 

CB 

N 

ffl 

H 

a 

o 

C_ O 

o 

rt 

OQ 

ffl 

3 

3 

CD 

3 

r t 

t—• 

CD 

IB 

7? 

CO 

rt 

CD 

OQ 

G 

t—' 

ffl 

rt 

KO 

3 

• 

H 

3 * 

H -

Cfl 

c 

o 

_ 1 — ' 

a 

•_. >a 

o NESHAP 

CD min t 

r t 

XT 

rt 

CD 

CD 

OQ 

rl 

o G 

t3 

H3 

OQ 

CO 

o i-h 

0) 

c 

a* 

o ffl 

r t 

CD 

OQ 

O 

rt 

t-aCD 

CO 

CB 

CO 

€ 

IB 

Ui 

y -

O 

3 

CD 

H3 

r t 

3 * 

<D 

CO 

XT 

O 

G 

>—' 

o. 

o 

o 3 

rt 

y 

I--

3 

Cfl 

H 

3 * 

CD 

3 * 

IB 

N 

CD 

r| 

O. 

0 

G 

Cfl 

o 

rt 

r t OQ 

ffl 

OQ 

OQ 

CD 

H 

CD 

CL 

CD 

ts 

ts 

h-' 

IB 

3 

H -

O 

z Pl 

rn 

X 

> T> 

M- 13 

O 

CD 

cr H -

1—• 

H -

r t 

VJ 

a. CD 

rt 

CD 

CO 

l-h 

O 

11 

CD 

CD 

O 

XT 

fO the 

r| 

O 

3 

C 

I—' 

OQ 

CD 

r t 

CD 

0-

j ~ . 

—* 

Z 

0 

< CD 

3 

cr CD 

rl 

r-' 

vO 

VO 

N9 

1 

CD 

OQ 

C 

i—» 

CD 

f t 

H0 

3 

. 

H3 

o 

I —' 

G 

y . 

CD 

a. 

H -

3 

CB 

3 

v<! 

O 

i-h 

r t 

XT 

CD 

rh 

^_ 

< CD 

OQ 

H 

O 

_ 

•a CO 

H -

3 

rt 

3 * 

CD 

CD 

U3 

G 

H-

•o 3 

CD 

3 

f t 

I—• 

CD 

CD 

TC 

CO 

ts 

rt 

CD 

ts 

y 

n 

CD 

a. 

i-h 

O 

H 

rr 

XT 

(D 

C-i 

CB 

3 

C_ D 

rt 

v«J 

ISJ 

VO 

1 

u> 

1—a 

>• 

I—' 

vO 

VO 

t-a 

z 

> 

H- < r| 

3 CD 

H- OQ 

Pl 3 C 

ro t-a 

3> r t ffl 

O rt 

O XT 

11 CD 

r| 

CD CD 

Cfl J2 

-XT rt ti C 

Cfl CD H -

0 

CD 3 

= . Q • 

O C 

<: HCD X) T3 

H 3 rt 

< CD O 

H- 3 t3 

CD r t O 

C Cfl 

r-' CD 

O CD CL 

l-h CD 

T? cn 

rt Cfl n 

XT O 

CD rt c 

CD "O 

X O Q 

IB C I-l 

N I—' I-l 

IB IB HH 

H r t 

a . K- o 

O O O 

C 3 r| 

CO H 

TJ CD 

O !-• Cfl 

rt C T3 

TJO Q Cfl O 

O 

H 

> O 

3 

CD 

CD 

r t 

t-a3 

OQ 

^ 

3 

O 

rt 

IB 3 

O H3 tS 

Du 3 

CO CD 

3 

t t rt 

O 

h-a 

Q CD 

r| IB 

O TT 

G CO 

T3 

0) n 

•D 

r-lOQ 

i-l c 

CD C^— D 

3 rt 

CL Ho HH 3 

I-H • 

h-1 

H- TJ 

3 H 

O 

rt tS 

XT O 

CD Cfl 

CD 

o 

rt 

OQ 

CB 

3 

h>-

r> 

z P I 

CO 

X 

T> J 

. 

T3 

rt 

O 

TJ 

o 

cn 

CD 

a 

cn 

n 

o 

£ 

•o 

l-H 

o 

o 

n 

rt 

CD 

Cfl 

CD O-tS 

3 ts a-ua H- r| Cfl 

O O 

O rt 

Z CD O 

P l Cfl 

CO W O 

XS r| 

> o o 10 CD c 

r t T3 

no CD Cfl 

rl OQ 

O O i-Vl 

 and 

ries jeet" 

G Cl 

ra~ r| 

«o O 

3 G 

CD *C 

3 

rt I-H 

r n 

i—' 

CD 

CD 

7>r 

CO 

O 

3 

a. CO 

r t 

O 

a 

rt 

O 

c T> 

l-H 

3 

H3 

O 

1 — ' 

_ CL 

CD 

a. 

c 3 

a. (D 

r| 

r+ 

3 * 

CD 

CO 

o 

o ts 

CD 

O 

Hh 

CIS -

CO 

H 

CD 

3 

a K--

3 

a. CD 

•1 

o l-h 

r t 

3 * 

CD 

t—a 

CD 

CB 

«CO * 

r| 

CD 

OQ 

G 

C_D ^ 

rtr^ 

o 3 

w 

o 3 

H -

rt 

r t 

r-»-

3 

OQ 

•H 

5 3 

I 

CO 

o 

o 3 

i-H 

TJ 

rt 

O 

n 

Cu 

31 

U 

O 

CB 

r t 

CD 

3-OQ 

CB 

N 

ffl 

ri ou

CL s 

o 

rt 

r»-

« CO not 

r t 

3 " 

CD 

TJ 

r| 

O 

O 

CD 

CO 

CO 

o CD 

r t 

CD 

OQ 

o 

rt 

v<5 

OQ 

rt 

O 

£2 

TJ 

H -

3 

OQ 

Cfl 

CA 

CD 

1 — • 

CD 

o 

rr 

CD 

O. 

rti 

O 

rt 

r t 

3 " 

CD 

CD 

J3 

G 

ratS 

3 

CD 

3 

r t 

XT 

IB 

N 

IB 

rl 

o. O 

c CO 

o H 

OQ 

ffl 

3 

M. 

O 

z Pl 

co 

X 

> 

•1 3> 

CD r t 

O r t 

O CB 

3 O 

3 3 -

CD CD 

3 CL 

n. CD IB 

CX r| 

CD 

cr 

>< r t 

3 * 

O CD 

3 

> • r t 

XT 

rr> r| 

O CD 

rt CD 

TIT ) OQ 

-

-H 

3 * 

(D 

CO 

CD 

OQ 

rt 

0 

C 

TJ 

H -

3 

CQ 

CA 

« 

» r| 

CD 

a- CD 

n 

H -

< <D 

CL using 

XT H 

ffl o 

CA G 

t^-tS 

3 i-. 

OQ 3 

OQ 

H - CO 

3 

o O r h 

O 

3 VJ 

TJ O 

t-a n 

>-. 3 

ID l-H 

3 

.-! tS 

CD H 

o 

« O 

l-a. CD 

r t CO 

XT CO 

rt O 

3 * CB 

CD r t 

<D 

OorieQ s 
P.11 

Why Phase-In Approach Will Alleviate Problems of Single MACT 

Compliance Schedule for All SOCMI Subcategories 

Provision for phased-in compliance with the SOCMI MACT regulations 

will allow for a more efficient and effective allocation of government 

and industry resources. In contrast to a short-term, significant 

increase in demand .for design engineers, ccntrol equipment, and 

permits, a longer, more sustained, less drastic change will allow 

"suppliers" to prepare for and effectively meet the demand. 

In addition, other factors suggest that available resources to 

meet demand for design engineers, control equipment, and permits will 

be greater in the post-1995 period than in the pre-1995 period. This 

is because states will have more resources to issue permits after their 

Title V Operating Permit Programs begin generating fees (by 1995). 

Finally, a phased-in compliance schedule would encourage and 

provide sufficient time for companies to consider source reduction 

techniques, (process redesign, material substitution, etc.) for sources 

within subcategories with a later applicability date. Source reduction 

techniques generally require longer lead time for process and product 

development. EPA, through its Pollution Prevention .Program, has 

recognized the merits of source reduction as a better environmental 

solution and is encouraging its use through voluntary programs and 

through elimination of regulatory impediments to pollution prevention. 

The use of source reduction has the added advantage in that it may 

eliminate the need for construction permits for control equipment. 

Conclusion 

CMA recommends a phase-in approach that would retain the features 

included in the negotiated MACT standards for equipment leaks. The 

phase-in approach would establish three groupings of SOCMI 

subcategories based on toxicity of hazardous air pollutants emitted. 

Phased-in compliance would be accomplished by setting applicability 

dates of 1992, 1994, and 1997 (assuming promulgation of the hazardous 

organic NESHAP by 1992) within a single rulemaking. 

CMA believes this approach is consistent with Congressional 

direction and will help to alleviate potential problems associated with 

a single compliance schedule for all SOCMI sources. 
P.12 

ATTACHMENT 

Production Processes in Proposed Group I 

Acetone 

Acetonitrile 

Acetonphenone 

Acrylamide 

Acrylonitrile 

Adiponitrile 

Allyl alcohol 

Aminophenol(p-isomer) 

Aniline 

Azobenzene 

Benzene(including benzene from gasoline) 

Benzenedisulfonic acid 

Benzenesulfonic acid 

Benzophenone(POM) 

Biphenyl 

Bis(Chloromethyl)Ether(dichloromethyl ether) 

Bromobenzene 

Butanediol (1,4-isomer) 

Butyrolactone 

Carbon tetrachloride 

Chloroacetophenone (2-) 

Chloroaniline (o-isomer) 

Chlorobenzene 

Chlorodifluormethane 

Chloroform 

Chloronitrobenzene (1,3-) 

Chloronitrobenzene (o-isomer) 

Chloronitrobenzene(p-isomer) 

Cumene hydroperoxide 

Cumene (isopropyl benzene) 

Cyclohexane 

Cyclohexanol 

Cyclohexanone 

Dichloroaniline (all isomers) 

Dichlorobenzene(1,4-Isomer)(p-isomer) 

Dichlorobenzene(m-isomer) 

Dichlorobenzene(o-isomer) 

Dichlorodifluoromethane 

Dichloroethane(1,2-isomer)(EDC) 

Dichloroethylether (bis(2-chloroethyl)ether) 

Diethanolaaine 

Diethylene glycol 

Diethylene glycol dibutyl ether 

Diethylene glycol diethyl ether (glycol ether) 

Diethylene glycol dimethyl either (glycol ether) 

Diethylene glycol aonobutyl either acetate(glycol ether) 

Diethylene glycol aonobutyl ether (glycol either) 

Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate (glycol ether) 

Diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (glycol either) 

Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (glycol ether) 

Dimethyl sulfate 

Dimethylaminoethanol(2-isomer) 

Dinitrobenzenes 
P 13 

Proposed Production Processes in Group I (Cont'd) 

Dioxane(l,4-Diethyleneoxide) 

Dioxliane 

Diphenyl methane 

Diphenyl oxide (POM) 

Dipropylene glycol 

Epichlorohydrin(l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane) 

Ethanolamines(all isomers) 

Ethyl benzene 

Ethylene carbonate 

Ethylene dibromide(Dibromoethane)(EDB) 

Ethylene glycol 

Ethylene glycol diacetate 

Ethylene Glycol Diethyl Ether 

Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether(glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate(glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate (glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether(glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monophenyl ether(glycol ether) 

Ethylene glycol monopropyl ether(glycol ether) 

Ethylene oxide 

Formaldehyde 

Fumaric acid 

Hexamethylenetetramine 

Hydroguinone 

Linear alkylbenzene(linear dodecylbenzene) 

Maleic anhydride 

Maleic Hydrazide 

Malic acid 

Metanilic acid 

Methionine 

Methylene chloride(Dichloromethane) 

Methylene dianiline(4,4-isomer)(MDA) 

MethyIstyrene(a-isomer) 

Nitroaniline(o-isomer) 

Nitroaniline(p-isomer) 

Nitrobenzene 

Octene-1 

Paraformaldehyde 

Pentaerythritol 

Perchloroethylene(Tetrachloroethylene) 

Phenylenediamine(p-Isomer) 

Piperazine 

Propiolactone(b isomer) 

Propionic acid 

Propylene glycol 

Propylene glycol monomethyl ether 

Propylene oxide 

Resorcinol 

Styrene(Vinyl Benzene) 

Succinic acid 
P.14 

Proposed Production Processes in Group I (Cont'd) 

Succinonitrile 

Tartaric Acid 

tetrachlorobenzene(1,2,4,5-isomer) 

Tetraethylene Glycol 

Trichlorobenzene(1,2,4-isomer) 

Trichloroethylene 

Trichlorogluoromethane 

Trichlorophenol(2,4,5,-) 

Trichlorotrifluoroethane(1,2,2-1,1,2,isomer) 

Triethanolamine 

Triethylene glycol 

Triethylene glycol dimethyl ether(glycol ether) 

Triethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether 

Trimethylopropane 

Vinyl chloride(Chloro Ethylene) 

Xylenes(Mixtures) 

Xylenes(o-isomer) 

Xylenes(p-isomer) 
P.15 

Proposed Production Processes in Group II 

Acetaldehyde 

Acetaldol 

Acetamide 

Acetanilide 

Acetic acid 

Acetic anhydride 

Acetyl chloride 

Anisidine(o-isomer) 

Butadiene(1,3-isomer) 

Butylene glycol (1,3-isomer) 

Caprolactam 

Carbon Tetrabromide 

Carbon tetrafluoride 

Chloral 

Chloracetic acid 

Chloroaniline (p-isomer) 

Chloroprene (2-Chloro-l,3-Butadiene) 

Chlorotrifluoromethane 

Crotonaidehyde 

Cyclooctadiene 

Cyclooctadiene (1,5-isomer) 

Dichloropropene (1,3-isomer) 

Dichloro-1-butene(3,4-isomer) 

Diethyl sulfate 

Dimethyl benzidine(3,3-isomer) 

Dimethyl formamide(NN-isomer)(DMF) 

Dimethyl Hydrazine (1,1-isomer) 

Dimethyl terephthalate 

Ethyl acetate 

Ethyl acrylate 

Ethyl chloroacetate 

Ethylenediamine 

Ethylhexyl acrylate(2-isoemr) 

Formamide 

Formic acid 

Glycerol 

Glycerol dichlorohydrin 

Glycine 

Glyoxal 

Hexachlorobenzene 

Hexachlorobutadlene 

Hexachloroethane 

Hexadiene(1,4-isomer) 

Methyl formate 

Paraldehyde 

Picoline(b-isomer) 

Pyridine 

Sodium chloroacetate 

Sulfolane 

Terephthalic acid 

Tetrachloroethane(1,1,2,2-isomer) 

Tetrahydrophthallc anhydride 

Tetramethylenediamlne 
P.16 

Proposed Production Processes in Group II (Cont'd) 

Toluene 2,4, diamine 

Toluene 2,4 diisocyanate 

Toluene disocyanates(mixture) 

Toluidine(o-isomer) 

Trichloroethane(1,1,1-isomer)(methylchloroform) 

Trichloroethane(1,1,2-isomer)(Vinyl Trichloride) 

Vinyl acetate 

Vinylcyclohexene(4-isomer) 

Vinylidene chloride(1,1-Dichloroethylene) 
Proposed Production Processes in Group II (Cont'd) 

Acetoacetanilide 

Aniline hydrochloride 

Anthraquinone (POM) 

Benzaldehyde 

Benzil (POM) 

Benzilic acid (POM) 

Benzoic acid 

Benzoin (POM) 

Benzoyl chloride 

Benzyl acetate 

Benzyl alcohol 

Benzyl benzoate (POM) 

Benzyl chloride 

Benzyl dichoride 

Bisphenol A(POM) 

Butylbenzyl phthalate 

Chlorotoluene (m-isomer) 

Chlorotoluene (o-isomer) 

Cresol (m-isomer) 

Cresols cresylic acid (mixed) 

Cresols (o-isomer) 

Cresols (p-isomer) 

Cyclohexylamine 

Dichlorophenol (2,4-isomer) 

Diethyl phthalate 

Dilsodecylphthalate 

Dimethyl Phthalate 

Dimethylaniline-N,N(N,N Diethylaniline) 

Dinitrophenol (2,4-isomer) 

Dinitrotolunene(2,4-isomer)(DNT) 

Diphenyl thiourea (POM) 

Diphenylamine(POM) 

Di-o-tolyguanidine 

Dodecylphenol 

Ethylaniline (N-Isomer) 

Ethylaniline(o-isomer) 

Isophthalic acid 

Isopropylpheno1 

Methlaniline(n-isomer) 

Methylcyclohexane 

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 

Nitroanisole(p-iosaer) 

Nitrophenol(4-)(p-) 

Nitrophenol(o-isoaer)(2-Nitrophenol) 

Nitrotoluene 

Nitrotoluene(2-Isomer)(o-) 

Nitrololuene(3-isoaer)(a-) 

Nitrotoluene(4-isomer)(P-) 

Octylphenol 

Pentachlorophenol 

Phenetidine(p-isoaer) 

Phenol 

Phenolphthalein 
P.18 

Proposed Production Processes in Group II (Cont'd) 

Phenoisulfonic acids(all isomers) 

Phloroglucinol 

Phthalic acid 

Phthalic anhydride 

Phthalimide 

Phthalonitrile 

P-tert-Butyl toluene 

Quinone 

Sallcyclic acid 

Sodium phenate 

Stilbene 

Sulfanilic acid 

Tetrabromophthalic anhydride 

Tetrachlorophthalic anhydride 

Toluenesulfonic acids (all isomers) 

Toluenesulfonyl chloride 

Trichloraniline(2,4,6-isomer) 

Vinyl toluene 

Xylene Sulfonic Acid 

xylene(m-isomer) 
P.19 

Proposed Production Processes in Group III 

Acrolein 

Acrylic acid 

Allyl chloride 

Allyl cyanide 

Ammonium thiocyanate 

Bromonaphthalene (POM) 

Carbon disulfide 

Chloronaphthalene (POM) 

Decahydronaphthalate 

Diallyl Phthalate 

Diethylamine 

Dimethyl ether-N,N 

Diemthylamine 

Ethyl chloride(Chloroethane) 

Glutaraldehyde 

Hexanetriol(l,2,6-isomer) 

Isophorone 

Methanol 

Methyl acetate 

Methyl bromide(Bromomethane) 

Methyl chloride(Chloromethane) 

Methyl Hydrazine 

Methyl isobutyl carbinol 

Methyl isbutyl ketone(Hexone) 

Methyl isocyanate 

Methyl mercaptan 

Methyl methacrylate 

Methylamine 

Naphthalene 

Naphthalene sulfonic acid(a-isomer)(POM) 

Naphthalene sulfonic acid(b-isoraer)(POM) 

Naphthol(a-isomer)(POM) 

Naphthol(b-isomer)(POM) 

Nitronaphthalene(l-)(POM) 

Perchloromethyl mercaptan 

Phosgene 

Proplonal dehyde 

Propylene dichloride(1,2-Dichloropropane) 

Sodium Methooxide 

Tetraethyl lead 

Tetrahydronaphthalene(Tetralin)(POM) 

Triethylamine 

Trimethylaraine 

Trimethylcyclohexanol 

Trimethylcyciohexanone 
Proposed Production Processes in Group III (Cont'd) 

Acetal 

Acetone cyanohydrin (CN compound) 

Bromoform 

Butyl acrylate (n-isomer) 

Carbaryl 

Chlorodifluoroethane 

Diaminophenol Hydrochloride 

Diethylaniline(2,6-isomer) 

Dllsooctyl phthalate 

Dodecylaniline 

Ethylamine 

Ethylcellulose 

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 

Isobutyl acrylate 

Isobutylene 

Methyl acrylate 

Methyl ethyl ketone(2-Butanone) 

Methyl Tert Butyl Ether 

Methylpentynol 

Nonylphenol 

N-Vinyl-2-Pyrrolidine 

Polyethylene glycol 

Polypropylene glycol 

Sodium formate 

Tetramethylethlene diamine 

Trimethylpentane(2,2,4-) 
P.21 

Proposed Production Processes in Group III (Cont'd) 

Acenaphthene(POM) 

Alizarin(POM) 

Alkyl anthraguineones 

Alkyl napthalene sulfonates 

Aminophenol sulfonic acid 

Anthroacene(POM) 

Carbazole 

Chrysene (PON) 

Diacetoxy-2-Butene(l,4-) 

Dibromomethane 

Dibutoxyethylphthalate 

Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 

Dichloro-2-butene(1,4-) 

Diethylene glycol monohexyl ether(GE) 

Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (GE) 

Di(2-methoxyethyl)phthalate 

Dodecyl benzene (branched) 

Dodecyl phenol (branched) 

Ethylene glycol dibutyl ether(GE) 

Ethylene glycol monoacetate 

Ethylene glycol monohexyl ether(GE) 

Ethylene glycol monooctyl ether (GE) 

Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic acid 

Ethylnaphthalene(2-isomer)(alkyl naphthalene) 

Fluoranthene(POM) 

Glyceraldehyde 

Hydroxyadipaldehyde 

iminodiethanol(2,2-) 

Isophorone nitrile 

Lead phthalate 

Methylcyclohexanol 

Methylionones(a-isomer) 

Methyinaphthalene(l-isomer)(alkyl naphthalene) 

Methylnaphthalene(2-isomer)(alkyl naphthalene) 

Naphtholsulfonic acid(l-)(POM) 

Naphthylamine sulfonic acid(l,4-)(P0M) 

Naphthylamine sulfonic acid(2,l-)(P0M) 

Naphthylamine(l-)(POM) 

Naphthylamine(2-)(POM) 

Nitropropane(2-) 

Nitroxylene 

Nonylbenzene(branched) 

Pentanol(2-) 

Phenanthrene(POM) 

Propylene carbonate 

Pyrene(POM) 

Tetraethylenepentamlne 

Thiocarbanilide 

Thiourea 

Triethylene glycol monoethyl ether 

Trimethylcyclohexylamine 

Tripropylene glycol 

Xanthates(potassium ethyl xanthate) 
P.22 

Attachment 4 

CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TIMELINE EXAMPLES 

(June 7, 1991) 

Small Liquid Incinerator 

Attached is the timeline (pg. 2) discussed during a CMA meeting 

with EPA in February of this year. This timeline represents the actual 

history to date of a small RCRA liquid waste incinerator 

(MSDO33417031). Some activities will probably not be completed until 

1992. 

This particular unit is similar (except for the burner assemblies) 

to two other units installed in the Southwest that are designed to 

incinerate vent gases from refineries and from chemical manufacturing 

plants. 

The general details of the unit shown on the attached drawings 

(pgs. 3,4,5), were taken directly from the permit application for the 

unit. The size of the unit would approximate the size of a large vent 

gas incinerator for a large multipurpose facility. Please note there 

is no scrubber and no particulate control devices because of the unique 

nature of the liquid wastes. 

This information is part of the public record for the incinerator 

and my be freely distributed. 
MS003W17031 

SMALL LIQUID INCINERATOR 

TINE 

ACTIVITY 

IDENTIFY 1 SELECT CONSULTANT 

TO REVIEW ft RECOMMEND 

EQUIPMENT 

SELECT ft REVIEW EQUIPMENT 

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 

PREPARE PERMIT APPLICATION 

SUBMIT APPLICATION 

1 

PERMIT REVIEW ft CHANGES 

PUBLIC HEARINGS 

DRAFT PERMIT 

PERMIT APPROVED 

to ' EQUIPMENT CONTRACT SIGHED 

I 

10/86 10/87 10/88 10/89 10/90 10/91 

DETAIL DESIGN 

EQUIPMENT PROCURNENT/DELIVERY 

SITE PREPARATION 

CONSTRUCTION 

COMMISSION 

START-UP 

TRIAL BURN PLAN (ANALYTICAL) 

REVIEW ft APPROVAL 

STACK TEST 

ANALYSIS OF STACK SAMPLES 

PREPARE ft SUBMIT REPORT 

REGULATORY REVIEW OF REPORT 

APPROVED ? 

RETEST & RESUBMIT 

ro 
P.24 

1

 & 

3 A <6> 

w' (Si a 

^ A 

A -

MOZIE. Sll£ 6Ty. _£2VI<:£ U_/. 

6" 4 S4Mf>L.'.\J6 2S-0' 

3' I 0,^Aose.t 13-c'' 

3* 1 CO^AI.SO . ^'- 6" 

3* 1 PLOW E.L_M_.»JT ij'-i ' 

24 | PcU6 .ASIMLST 4-4" 

3 ' i KJOXA»OALYSEJL LV-C" 

Mores: 

t. MOT TO SCALE 

^ '/li " COR- AUOv«jA»OC£ 

4. A Wi- CONJSTlLUCTIONj 

5. STAitwAy NOT SMOK»*J 

6. lowe d R.l£(-g. l/Vc.S.ffc 

ft^y/i se.0 S-^o-QA Bnvj.P*-

PROPRIETARY - TO 8E 

MAINTAINED IN CONFIDENCE • 

OAtC 

g__ g-tg-si 

CMftO. OAfC 

A»»0 . OAtC 

TITLE 

VEKJT STACK 

PIRST (CHEM. COZP. 

JOHN ZINK 

OWC. MO. 

S-S2I& - 30 1 

- 3 -
FIGURE D-6 

INCINERATOR EQUIPMENT LAYOUT 

J, I 

r r f>Mt.Ai_oiitT 

_______ 

_____ ,.v-»*. .<-*• is'-o* t'-o* 20'- 0* 

'Xci.K 

gL__J"|~'1 j^ l 

FIII_TIC : L 

4 

KE-0» AIZ 

i^i-O^E.a. 

1. MOT ID ICMJL 

3. (ftPAMSlOM lOiuTfi QjT JE <« " -MO*j} 

PgELtMiKMtY EQUIPMENT LAYOUT 

MOXIOIZEK SYSTEM fOR 

PIR&T CHEMICAL C3gP 

PASdA<V<J<-A.HS 

S O * SS62I6 Rtfc 1-73-S7 
9O0LB&/HK 

ATOM. STEAM. 

^OOL&f/HK 

RECYCLEo 

FLU E .A S 

_00L6S/HR 

FUU. «AS/ 

PILOT {AS 

i l L6A/HR. 

• t 

.MiftMeg. 

STREAM*? 

' 900L5t/Ha 

ATOM. S.T6AM 

' 300 L6S/HR. 

.COMftUCTIOM AiR 

'ia4T0LB-A4R 

-

PLUS -AS 

COJ. 4.&Z 5 L&S/H * 

H.p l,&8 - U2»l/nL 

m,307 (-BS/HK. 

4 1 & Lf>S/n4 

I - V ues/HB. 

TOTM. * •>*,£>.i + 

o_ 

C O 

l-JlTLfci/HR. FLU E GA S 

2&,0OSLR»&/HR. 

IDO * 

SEC.CL6-

FLU E CA S 

1.260L6S/HR. 

1310*. 

(?^-^IOATI-N 

&__TIQM 

U_CS?L6S/HL 

IfiCO'F 

Ul= AT gfcCQVEM 49.„5gu°,&/Hg.t_ 

ISO*? 

RSXYCL&O 

Fuj e -IA S 

40(S«SUi4/HJ5. 

RG-OXib. AlR 

8,130 L&S/HK. OVERAL L MATE-RIAL -ALAMC c 

MQXID^E. g MIT H HE.AT R=.C0v/_g.y 

RgS T CY-\ E M I (TAL OQgPM . 

SHOP OR0=e . t" _ 5=>7IC 

R<J_ i-l 6-3 1 

B_v. 4.I-.-67 R_W._-iO-Sl 

i=v 8-3i^£T 

c 

c 

I 
P.27 

Timeline Based on Questionnaire 

The responses to the CMA questionnaire that follows are best 

understood when placed in the context of the process that is generally 

utilized for engineering design and construction. The seriousness of 

extremely short compliance deadlines is magnified by the realization 

that stops in the process are essentially performed in series; 

therefore, similar tasks must be completed by the same disciplines 

simultaneously across all projects. Chart 1 (pg. 7) graphically 

illustrates the construction process for three kinds of projects; a 

simple project done on an As-Soon-As-Possible basis (Project 1), a 

simple project done on an As-Late-As-Possible basis (Project 3), and a 

complex project done As-Soon-As-Possible with not time for slippage in 

schedule (Project 2). As indicated on the chart, major tasks groups 

(such as permitting and equipment procurement) comprise only a fraction 

of the time within the overall compliance time period and overlap 

projects. As the number of projects within a given time period is 

increased (i.e., shorter compliance time periods), the probability of 

meeting required objectives by compliance deadlines is reduced and at 

some point may become impossible to accomplish. 

The concern of meeting schedule is common to all task elements 

since overload of task resources may be possible in any task group. 

The responses to the questionnaire therefore provide a sampling of 

data that can be utilized to anticipate the likelihood of task resource 

overload in the areas of: 

Engineering Concept Development 

Detailed Engineering 

Permitting 

Equipment Procurement 

Construction 

Shakedown 

-6-
losk ConU 

CHART 1 

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/CONSTRUCTION PROCESS - MACT STANDARDS 

losk COMPLIANCE PERIOD 

OOI 

092 

003 

004 

005 

006 

007 

008 

009 

010 

Oil 

0)2 

O O 

014 

015 

016 

01? 

016 

I 

I 

L 

PROJECT CONCEPT 1 

PERMIT APP PREP I 

PERMIT APPROVLI 

EOUIP PROCURl 

C0NSTRUC1WN1 

SHAKEDOWN 1 

PROJECT C0NCEPI2 

PERMIT APP PREP2 

PERMIT APPR0W2 

EQUV PR0CUR2 

C0NSTROCTI0K2 

SHAKE00WN2 

PROJECT CONCEPT} 

PERMIT APP PREP3 

PERMIT APPROVO 

EOUP PR0CUR3 

CONSTRUCTIONS 

SHAKE0ONN3 

_______ S S -

iSSWSS . 

INT^VSSV^S^^ ; 

J5_J 

\\\S\\\SS\\S\\ L KN\SSS\S\»S\\VV^VV < CVC I 

j__s__ 

c_______a 

c____________S3: 

AV.VUWUUV^ V 

PERMIT APPROVAL PERIOP 

NSSSS.SSSS . 

EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT PERIOD 

PROJECT 1 - Siople Project Scheduled ASAP 

PROJECT 2 - Large, Complex Project Scheduled ASAP and Expected to Require Entire Compliance Period 

PROJECT 3 - Simple Project Scheduled ALAP