alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1411 

To amend the Small Business Act to allow certain ranchers and farmers 

categorized as partnerships to use an alternative calculation for a maximum loan amount under the paycheck protection program, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2021 

Mr. HAGEDORN (for himself, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, 

Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. 

MEUSER, Mr. BACON, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. 

BAIRD, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. UPTON, Mr. TURNER, Ms. 

TENNEY, Mr. MANN, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. BALDERSON, 

Mr. ALLEN, Mrs. FISCHBACH, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. 

PFLUGER, Mr. TIMMONS, Mrs. KIM of California, Mr. CLINE, Mrs. 

MCCLAIN, Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. VALADAO, 

Mr. ROSE, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. FEENSTRA, 

Mr. EMMER, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. HERN, Mr. BABIN, Mr. GIBBS, Ms. 

VAN DUYNE, Mr. STEWART, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. KELLER, 

Mr. DONALDS, Mr. WILLIAMS of Texas, and Mr. BENTZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to allow certain ranchers 

and farmers categorized as partnerships to use an alternative calculation for a maximum loan amount under 

the paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1411 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Flexibility for 

5 Farmers and Ranchers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PARTNERSHIP PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM 

7 LOAN CALCULATION AS FARMER OR RANCH8 ER. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a)(36)(V)(i)(I) of the 

10 Small Business Act (as amended by the Economic Aid to 

11 Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act 

12 (Public Law 116–260)) is amended by inserting ‘‘is a 

13 partnership,’’ after ‘‘independent contractor,’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para16 graph (2), the amendments made by subsection (a) 

17 shall be effective as if included in the CARES Act 

18 (Public Law 116–136; 134 Stat. 281) and shall 

19 apply to any loan made pursuant to section 7(a)(36) 

20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)) 

21 before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

22 Act, including forgiveness of such a loan. 

23 (2) EXCLUSION OF LOANS ALREADY FOR24 GIVEN.—The amendments made by subsection (a) 

25 shall not apply to a loan made pursuant to section 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1411 IH

1 7(a)(36) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

2 636(a)(36)) for which the borrower received forgive3 ness before the date of enactment of this Act under 

4 section 1106 of the CARES. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Luis Alberto OCHOA-GRAMAJO, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 15-73429

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 14, 2017

Salvador Ortiz, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Salvador Ortiz, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner

Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Jane Tracey Schaffner, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*248MEMORANDUM **

Luis Alberto Ochoa-Gramajo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Silaya v. Mukasey,*524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the particular social group Ochoa-Gramajo raises in his opening brief, because he failed to raise it to the agency. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or claims in administrative proceedings below).

The IJ denied Ochoa-Gramajo’s asylum claim as time-barred, and the BIA deemed the issue waived on appeal. Although Ochoa-Gramajo raises arguments regarding the merits of his asylum claim, he does not challenge the agency’s dispositive determinations as to asylum in his opening brief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to his asylum claim.

As to withholding of removal, Ochoa-Gramajo similarly does not challenge the BIA’s dispositive determinations that he failed to establish the harm he suffered and fears was or is on account of a protected ground. *See id.*Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Ochoa-Gramajo’s withholding of removal claim.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Ochoa-Gramajo failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Guatemalan government. *See Silaya,*524 F.3d at 1073. We reject Ochoa-Grama-jo’s contention that the agency erred in its analysis.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
REPUBLIC-VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. The TAUBMAN COMPANY, LLC and Sherrill Conage, Respondents.

Case No. 2D17-4292

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### Eman Abdel MAGID; Mohamed Shama, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 16-2329

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 2017

Decided: July 21, 2017

Saher J. Macarius, Audrey Botros, LAW OFFICES OF SAHER J. MACARIUS, LLC, Framingham, Massachusetts, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jesse M. Bless, Senior Litigation Counsel, Barbara J. Leen, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eman Abdel Magid and derivative petitioner Mohamed Shama, both natives and citizens of Egypt, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of Magid’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Magid’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. *See In re Magid*(B.I.A. Oct. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Armando CRUZ-GALVAN, a.k.a. Armando, a.k.a. Luis Armando Cruz, a.k.a. Panda, a.k.a. Kung Fu Panda, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10227

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted August 9, 2017 *

Filed August 14, 2017

Jeffrey Ryan Borup, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Krissa Marie Lanham, USPX—Office of the US Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Luis Armando Cruz-Galvan, Pro Se

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Armando Cruz-Galvan appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 121-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(vii), and 846, and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), (h). Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cruz-Galvan’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Cruz-Galvan has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Cruz-Galvan waived his right to appeal his conviction, sentence, and the order of forfeiture. Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. *See United States v. Watson,*582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. *See id.*at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned,  the Chief Financial  Officer of W Holding  Company,  Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

     (a)  the Form 10-K of the Company  for the Year Ended  December  31,  2002,
          filed on the date hereof with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission
          (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
          Company.

                                          /s/ Freddy Maldonado
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Freddy Maldonado
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          March 28, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to W Holding  Company,  Inc. and will be retained by W Holding Company,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Officer Certification** Exhibit 31.2
I, Christopher W. Wolf, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Catalina MarketingCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to            state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004     By: /s/ Christopher W. Wolf     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
28
Kivia WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. PENSCO TRUST COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., Appellant, v. Jacob KRAWIEC; Kayela Krawiec, Appellee.

No. 1D17-508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 13, 2018

Susan B. Morrison, of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and David M. Snyder, of David M. Snyder, and Joshua D. Moore, of Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellant.

Adam B. Schemer, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . *See**Dyck-O'Neal, Inc., v. Lanham* , 214 So.3d 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (certifying conflict between this Court's decision *Higgins v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.* , 201 So.3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), and decisions by the other four district courts of appeal), *review granted* , SC17-975, 2017 WL 4052015 (Fla. Sept. 14, 2017).

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.
1

 The Honorable David Peeples signed the judgment at issue in this appeal; however, the Honorable Jose A.

Lopez is the presiding judge of the 49th Judicial District Court of Zapata County, Texas.

iii i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00477-CV

GONZALEZ & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, P.C., and Priscilla de los Santos,

Appellants

v.

Raul Robert TAPIA,

Appellee 

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6349

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 20, 2008

DISMISSED

The appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
Carol TREVARTHEN, Appellant, v. Scott TREVARTHEN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2526

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
E.C. v. In the matter of M.B.E.H., a minor child

2160303

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the three month period ending March 31, 1997, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          25,664
<SECURITIES>                                    55,489
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,404
<PP&E>                                           5,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,747
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   438
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,642)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,642)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
EX PARTE Charles William BRACY, Jr.

CR-16-0561

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6122 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6122

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary 
  of Labor to conduct a study and issue a report on grant programs to 
                     support the nursing workforce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2023

   Mr. Nunn of Iowa (for himself, Ms. Titus, and Ms. Lee of Nevada) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and 
   the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary 
  of Labor to conduct a study and issue a report on grant programs to 
                     support the nursing workforce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Train More Nurses Act''.

SEC. 2. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON PROGRAMS SUPPORTING THE NURSING 
              WORKFORCE.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of 
Labor, jointly, shall--
            (1) conduct a review of all grant programs carried out by 
        the Department of Health and Human Services or the Department 
        of Labor that support the nurse workforce; and
            (2) not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
        this Act, submit to Congress a report on the review under 
        paragraph (1) that includes recommendations for changes to such 
        grant programs to improve upon the goals of--
                    (A) increasing nurse faculty, particularly in 
                underserved areas;
                    (B) providing pathways for nurses who have more 
                than 10 years of clinical experience to become faculty 
                at schools of nursing; and
                    (C) encouraging and increasing the nursing pipeline 
                through pathways for licensed practical nurses to 
                become registered nurses.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000099

28-JUL-2016

07:49 AM
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

** **

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:

 

(1)           This Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Option Care, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Option Care, Inc.

 

 
| Date: August  14, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Rajat  Rai           |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Rajat Rai                |
|                   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of M~Wave, Inc.
      (the “Company”) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
                November 13, 2006
            
            /s/
                Jim MayerJim
                MayerInterim
                Chief Executive Officer/s/
                Jeff FiglewiczJeff
                FiglewiczChief
                Financial Officer








This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.