alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John F. BIG LEGGINS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30079

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*779Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 25, 2017

Leif Johnson, Tim Tatarka, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Office of the US Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee

John F. Big Leggins, Jr., Pro Se

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges,

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Big Leggins, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Big Leggins sought to correct the written judgment, which he contends erroneously states that restitution payments are to be made during his term of incarceration. He argues that this conflicts with the oral pronouncement of sentence, which he claims delayed restitution payments until the commencement of his supervised release term. We agree with the district court that there is no conflict between the written judgment and oral pronouncement of sentence, which was silent as to when restitution payments will commence. Thus, the district court did not clearly err in finding that there was no clerical error in the judgment that warranted correction under Rule 36. See *United States v. Dickie,*752 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Jeffrey W. PETTIT Plaintiff-Appellant v. Nancy A. BERRYHILL1, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Defendant-Appellee

No. 16-2629

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 2017

Filed: March 20, 2017

Jeffrey W. Pettit, Pro. Se

Jeffrey P. Ray, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Kansas City, MO, Joshua R. Sumner, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel Region YII, Kansas City, MO, for Defendant-Appellee

Before RILEY, ARNOLD and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

1

. Nancy A. Berryhill has been appointed to serve as Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey W. Pettit appeals the district court’s2 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits (DIB). We agree with the district court that substantial evidence supports the determination that Mr. Pettit is not entitled to DIB for the period at issue here, i.e., from February 2001 through March 2004. See Teague v..As-true, 638 F.3d 611, 614 (8th Cir. 2011) (de novo review). Specifically, we find that because the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that Mr. Pettit’s subjective complaints were not entirely credible was based on several valid reasons, this determination is entitled to deference, see Mabry v. Colvin, 815 F.3d 386, 389 (8th Cir. 2016) (this court defers to credibility findings if they are supported by good reasons and substantial evidence); and that the ALJ’s determination of Mr, Pettit’s residual functional capacity (RFC) was also supported by the relevant evidence, see Boyd v. Colvin, 831 F.3d 1015, 1020 (8th Cir. 2016) (it is ALJ’s responsibility to determine RFC based on all relevant evidence: medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and claimant’s own description of his limitations). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

2

, The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
ADDENDUM #1 TO SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 AGREEMENT



This Addendum #1, ("Addendum #1) is made effective as of October 31, 2000 and
shall constitute written agreement amending the September 28, 2000 Stock
Purchase Agreement ("9/28/00 SPA") by and between Origin Investment Group, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation, with its principal place offices at 1620 26th Street,
Third Floor, Santa Monica, California, 90404 (formerly 980 North Michigan
Avenue, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois, 60611 ("Buyer"), Mr. Kent R. Busse and
Mrs. Paula L. Busse as Trustees to the Busse Family Trust dated 7/12/00,
residents of the State of California, City of Long Beach (The Busse Family
Trust, and Mr. Kent R. Busse and Mrs. Paula L. Busse acting in the capacity as
Trustees to the Busse Family Trust, collectively referred to herein as
"Sellers"). This Addendum #1 amends the 9/28/00 as follows:

1.  Buyer and  Sellers  agree to extend the due date of  Sellers  obligation  to
produce  the  Disclosure  Letter as defined on Page 2 of the  9/28/00 SPA to the
close of  business on  November  2, 2000;

2. Buyer and Sellers agree to amend Section 9.1(e) of the 9/28/00 SPA to read as
follows:

9.1               (e) by either Buyer or Sellers if the Closing has not occurred
                  (other than through the failure of any party seeking to
                  terminate this Agreement to comply fully with its obligations
                  under this Agreement) on or before November 15, 2000, or such
                  later date as the parties may agree upon.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of
the date first written above.


Buyer:                                                              Sellers:

       /s/ Omar A. Rizvi                           /s/ Kent R. Busse
By: __________________________                     _____________________________
       Omar Rizvi, Chairman and President          Mr. Kent R. Busse
                                                   Trustee to Busse Family Trust


                                                   /s/ Paula L. Busse
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Mrs. Paula L. Busse
                                                   Trustee to Busse Family Trust
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57844-57845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22954]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Civilian Community Corps Advisory Board gives notice 
of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, October 22, 2013, 2:30 p.m.--3:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: Conference Room 8312, 8th floor, Corporation for National and 
Community Service Headquarters, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20525.

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 888-469-1380 conference call 
access code number 2074759. Kate Becker will be the lead on the call. 
Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to 
the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they 
initiate over wireless lines, and the Corporation will not refund any 
incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate 
over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Replays 
are generally available one hour after a call ends. The toll-free phone 
number for the replay is 800-947-6304, replay passcode 7417. The end 
replay date: November 22, 2013, 3:59 p.m. (CT).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Meeting Convenes
     Call to Order, Welcome, and Preview of Today's Meeting 
Agenda
     Introduction & Acknowledgements
II. Approval of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. Director's Report
IV. Program Reports
     Projects and Partnerships
     Policy and Operations
     20th Anniversary
     Member Development
V. Public Comment

ACCOMMODATIONS: Anyone who needs an interpreter or other accommodation

[[Page 57845]]

should notify the Corporation's contact person by 5:00 p.m. Thursday, 
October 17, 2013.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Erma Hodge, NCCC, Corporation for 
National and Community Service, Room 9802B, 9th Floor, 1201 New York 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone 202-606-6696. Fax 202-606-3459. 
TTY 800-833-3722. Email: ehodge@cns.gov.

    Dated: September 16, 2013.
Valerie E. Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-22954 Filed 9-17-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
```
**Exhibit 16**

 

**CONSENT OF KATHLEEN ALTMAN**

 

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-Fof New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connectionwith, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mesquite Mine,Imperial County, California, U.S.A.”, dated February 28, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc.for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registrationstatement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc. 

 

Dated this 27th day of March, 2015

 

 

*/s/ Kathleen Altman	*

Kathleen Altman, P.E.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 12

                             THE FINOVA GROUP INC.
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF (LOSSES) INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Reorganized Company             Predecessor Company
                                                                    One Month Ended    Eight Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30, 2001     August 31, 2001     September 30, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                   <C>                   <C>                   <C>
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income
  taxes                                                               $(849,633)            $(654,274)            $ 53,841

Add fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                                       47,734               436,445              454,421
  One-third of rentals                                                      285                 2,882                3,335
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total fixed charges                                                  48,019               439,327              457,756
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Loss) income from continuing operations as adjusted                  $(801,614)            $(214,947)            $511,597
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of (loss) income from continuing operations to fixed
  charges                                                                (16.69)                (0.49)                1.12
===============================================================================================================================

Preferred stock dividend on a pre-tax basis                                                     3,074                4,770
Total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends                     $  48,019             $ 442,401             $462,526
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio of (loss) income from continuing operations to fixed
  charges and preferred stock dividends                                  (16.69)                (0.49)                1.11
===============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
Ryan J. CONNELL, DOC# R54024, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4023

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Robert S. BALLARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolee MULLINS; William Goodman; Ashlee Barnes, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6061

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 31, 2017

Robert S. Ballard, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellees.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*78PER CURIAM:

Robert S. Ballard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Ballard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ballard v. Mullins,*No. 5:15-ct-03045-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1029 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2021 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To Waive the application fee for any special use permit 

for veterans’ special events at war memorials on land 

administered by the National Park Service in the District 

of Columbia and its environs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1029 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Free Veterans from 

3 Fees Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION 

5 FEE FOR VETERANS’ SPECIAL EVENTS. 

6 (a) WAIVER.—The application fee for any special use 

7 permit solely for a veterans’ special event at war memo8 rials on land administered by the National Park Service 

9 in the District of Columbia and its environs shall be 

10 waived. 

11 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

12 (1) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND ITS ENVI13 RONS.—The term ‘‘the District of Columbia and its 

14 environs’’ has the meaning given that term in sec15 tion 8902(a) of title 40, United States Code. 

16 (2) GOLD STAR FAMILIES.—The term ‘‘Gold 

17 Star Families’’ includes any individual described in 

18 section 3.2 of Department of Defense Instruction 

19 1348.36. 

20 (3) SPECIAL EVENT.—The term ‘‘special 

21 events’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

22 7.96 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations. 

23 (4) VETERAN.—The term ‘‘veteran’’ has the 

24 meaning given that term in section 101(2) of title 

25 38, United States Code. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1029 RFS

1 (5) VETERANS’ SPECIAL EVENT.—The term 

2 ‘‘veterans’ special event’’ means a special event of 

3 which the majority of attendees are veterans or Gold 

4 Star Families. 

5 (6) WAR MEMORIAL.—The term ‘‘war memo6 rial’’ means any memorial or monument which has 

7 been erected or dedicated to commemorate a military 

8 unit, military group, war, conflict, victory, or peace. 

9 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to any 

10 special use permit application submitted after the date of 

11 the enactment of this Act. 

12 (d) APPLICABILITY OF EXISTING LAWS.—Permit ap13 plicants remain subject to all other laws, regulations, and 

14 policies regarding the application, issuance and execution 

15 of special use permits for a veterans’ special event at war 

16 memorials on land administered by the National Park 

17 Service in the District of Columbia and its environs. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 19, 

2021. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Eddie James MURPHY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0093

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Jimmy Lee WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1193

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

A simple addition error on appellant's sentencing scoresheet led the state, defendant, and the trial judge to believe that appellant's lowest permissible sentence was 99.45 months instead of 57.45 months. The scoresheet error is not harmless because the record does not conclusively show that the judge would have sentenced the defendant to the same 99.45 month prison term, having stated that he was not *1130inclined to "go against" the scoresheet. *See**Brooks v. State* , 969 So.2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007) ("When scoresheet error is presented ... any error is harmless if the record conclusively shows that the trial court *would have imposed* the same sentence using a correct scoresheet.") (emphasis in original). We therefore reverse and remand to the circuit court for resentencing.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Immtech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric L. Sorkin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Eric L. Sorkin |
|--------|--------------------|

Eric L. Sorkin

President & Chief Executive Officer 

February 9, 2007

 

----
HAWKS PRESERVE OFFICE RETAIL, LLC, Appellant, v. RES-FL SIX, LLC; Elizabeth Maki ; William Ross Hooker; Carlos A. Cardenas ; Vivette T. Cardenas; Alene Carver; Jack Carver; David L. Davis; Jackeline Davis; Neal Gigliotti; Ignacia Iriarte; Barbara Diane Kralick; Kenneth A. Kralick; Laurellyn Ludwig; Spencer Raffel; David Sakumura; and Alico Commercial Park Master Association, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-486

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Yitzak MOR, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 25, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellee's motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Appellee's motion for appellate attorney's fees is denied.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### Michael Anthony JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; BOP Agency; Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director; J. F. Caraway, Regional Director; C. Eichenlaub, Regional Director; Terry O’Brien, Warden; W. Odom, Associate Warden; Dr. Gregory S. Mims, II, Clinical Director; Jamie Hamilton, Hospital Administrator; C. Lafluer, Assistant Hospital Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6422

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Michael Anthony Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his federal civil rights and Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 20, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on March 27, 2017.* Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 For the puipose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

PREET M. SINGH, Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent

______________________

2016

- 2668

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0752

- 15

- 0629 -I- 1.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

C ASSADY T OLES , Kern, Noda, Devine & Segal, San Francisco, CA, argued for petitioner.

M ARK E. P ORADA , Commercial Litig ation Branch, Civil Division, United S tates Department of Justice, Washin gton, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by B ENJAMIN C. M IZER
, R OBERT E. K IRSCHMAN
, J R

. , E LIZABETH M. H OSFORD ; M ORGAN E. R EHRIG
, Office of General Counsel , U nited S tates Postal Service, Washin gton, DC.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST
, Chief Judge, R EYNA and T ARANTO
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
William THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2567

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.