Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 41447 

the NAAQS by the applicable 

attainment date of July 20, 2016. 

■ 4. Section 52.1885 is amended by 

adding paragraph (oo) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1885 Control strategy: Ozone. 

* * * * * 

(oo) Determination of attainment. As 

required by section 181(b)(2)(A) of the 

Clean Air Act, EPA has determined that 

the Cleveland, OH marginal 2008 ozone 

nonattainment area has attained the 

NAAQS by the applicable attainment 

date of July 20, 2016. 

■ 5. Section 52.1892 is amended by 

adding paragraph (g) to read as follows: 

§ 52.1892 Determination of attainment. 

* * * * * 

(g) As required by section 181(b)(2)(A) 

of the Clean Air Act, EPA has 

determined that the Cleveland, OH 

marginal 2008 ozone nonattainment 

area has attained the NAAQS by the 

applicable attainment date of July 20, 

2016. This determination is based on 

complete, quality-assured and certified 

data for the 3-year period 2013–2015. 

[FR Doc. 2016–15050 Filed 6–24–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0366; FRL–9948–21– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Sulfur 

Dioxide 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to 

the Minnesota sulfur dioxide (SO2) State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Flint 

Hills Resources, LLC Pine Bend 

Refinery (FHR) as submitted on May 1, 

2015. The revision will consolidate 

existing permanent and enforceable SO2

SIP conditions into the facility’s joint 

Title I/Title V SIP document. This 

action highlights process modifications 

necessary to meet EPA’s Tier 3 gasoline 

sulfur standards; a comprehensive 

monitoring strategy to better quantify 

SO2 emissions from fuel gas-fired 

emission units; a new restrictive flaring 

procedure for refinery process units, 

and other updates and administrative 

changes. This revision results in a 

modeled reduction in SO2 emissions 

from FHR and modeled SO2 ambient air 

concentrations less than half of the 

national ambient air quality standards 

(NAAQS). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective August 26, 2016, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by July 27, 

2016. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2015–0366 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the ‘‘For Further 

Information Contact’’ section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for this action? 

A. EPA’s Tier 3 Gasoline Standards 

B. Administrative Order and Title I SO2

SIP Conditions 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP revision? 

A. EPA’s Tier 3 Gasoline Standards 

B. Administrative Order and Title I SO2

SIP Conditions 

C. Miscellaneous Revisions 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for this 

action? 

A. EPA’s Tier 3 Gasoline Standards 

On April 28, 2014 (79 FR 23414 and 

amended on April 22, 2016, at 81 FR 

23641), EPA established more stringent 

vehicle emissions standards to reduce 

the sulfur content of gasoline beginning 

January 1, 2017. The Tier 3 gasoline fuel 

standards (Tier 3 standards) will reduce 

both tailpipe and evaporative emissions 

from both new and existing passenger 

cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty 

passenger vehicles, and some heavyduty vehicles. This will result in 

significant reductions in pollutants such 

as ozone, particulate matter, and air 

toxics across the country and help state 

and local agencies in their efforts to 

attain and maintain health-based 

NAAQS. 

In order to meet the Tier 3 standards, 

FHR plans to increase its use of 

hydrotreating to remove sulfur from 

intermediate fuel products. The 

increased hydrotreating will also 

increase the removal of nitrogen. To 

address the increased removal of 

nitrogen and sulfur, FHR proposes to 

install a process to convert gas 

containing sulfur and nitrogen into a 

salable, non-hazardous, aqueous liquid 

fertilizer: ammonium thiosulfate (ATS). 

B. Administrative Order and Title I SO2

SIP Conditions 

Minnesota also requested EPA’s 

approval of the transfer of Title I SO2

SIP conditions from an Administrative 

Order (Order) into the FHR Title I/Title 

V SO2 SIP document. Until 1990, 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

(MPCA) had placed SIP control 

measures in permits issued to culpable 

sources. In 1990, EPA determined that 

limits in state-issued permits were not 

federally enforceable because the 

permits expired. Subsequently, MPCA 

then issued permanent Orders to 

affected sources in nonattainment areas 

from 1991 to February of 1996. 

In 1995, EPA approved into the 

Minnesota SIP Minnesota’s consolidated 

permitting regulations. (60 FR 21447, 

May 2, 1995). The consolidated 

permitting regulations included the 

term ‘‘Title I condition’’ which was 

written, in part, to satisfy EPA 

requirements that SIP control measures 

remain permanent. A ‘‘Title I condition’’ 

is defined, in part, as ‘‘any condition 

based on source-specific determination 

of ambient impacts imposed for the 

purpose of achieving or maintaining 

attainment with a national ambient air 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
41448 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

quality standards and which was part of 

a [SIP] approved by the EPA or 

submitted to the EPA pending approval 

under section 110 of the act . . . .’’ 

MINN. R. 7007.1011 (2013). The 

regulations also state that ‘‘Title I 

conditions and the permittee’s 

obligation to comply with them, shall 

not expire, regardless of the expiration 

of the other conditions of the permit.’’ 

Further, ‘‘any title I condition shall 

remain in effect without regard to 

permit expiration or reissuance, and 

shall be restated in the reissued permit.’’ 

MINN. R. 7007.0450 (2007). 

Minnesota has initiated using the 

joint Title I/Title V document as the 

enforceable document for imposing 

emission limitations and compliance 

requirements in SIPs. The SIP 

requirements in the joint Title I/Title V 

document submitted by MPCA are cited 

as ‘‘Title I conditions,’’ therefore 

ensuring that SIP requirements remain 

permanent and enforceable. EPA 

reviewed the state’s procedure for using 

joint Title I/Title V documents to 

implement site-specific SIP 

requirements and found it to be 

acceptable under both Title I and Title 

V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (July 3, 

1997 letter from David Kee, EPA, to 

Michael J. Sandusky, MPCA). 

FHR’s SIP obligations are currently 

contained in an Order that was adopted 

by MPCA on August 29, 2011, and 

approved by EPA on May 15, 2013 (78 

FR 28501) (FHR Order). On May 1, 

2015, MPCA submitted revisions to the 

Minnesota SO2 SIP for FHR. MPCA 

requested that EPA approve into the 

SIP, the Title I SO2 SIP conditions 

contained in the joint Title I/Title V 

document while removing the FHR 

Order from the SIP. In addition to 

incorporating FHR’s current SO2 SIP 

obligations into the facility’s joint Title 

I/Title V document, MPCA requested 

approval of additional changes to the 

Minnesota SO2 SIP. 

II. What is EPA’s analysis of the SIP 

revision? 

A. EPA’s Tier 3 Gasoline Standards 

Title I SO2 SIP conditions have been 

created for the ATS process unit, which 

include hourly and annual emissions 

limits, as well as monitoring, record 

keeping, and reporting requirements for 

the ATS process unit. The ATS unit will 

take H2S and ammonia from sour water 

streams and convert them into ATS, 

which will then be sold as fertilizer. The 

unit is being constructed in conjunction 

with FHR’s plan to meet EPA’s Tier 3 

fuel standards. The ATS unit will allow 

FHR to utilize the increased amounts of 

sulfur and nitrogen removed from 

intermediate fuel products by gas-oil 

hydrotreaters by combining them into 

ATS. 

Review of the technical support 

document and computer modeling 

reports submitted by MPCA shows that 

installation of the ATS unit in 

conjunction with the other updates to 

the facility will not cause an exceedance 

of the modeled SO2 standards. The data 

show that SO2 emissions will be 

between 6 and 8 percent less than 

emissions from the facility modeled 

under the last SIP revision. Using 

AERMOD and including FHR and 

nearby sources, the modeled ambient air 

concentrations of SO2 for the 3-hour, 24- 

hour, and annual SO2 NAAQS for these 

revisions are at 41.5%, 48.5%, and 

27.5% of the standards, respectively. 

Therefore, the addition of Title I SO2

SIP requirements for the ATS unit is 

acceptable and the revisions to the FHR 

SIP are approvable. 

B. Administrative Order and Title I SO2

SIP Conditions 

On March 17, 2015, MPCA amended 

the operating permit for FHR (Air 

Emissions Permit No. 03700011–012). 

This joint Title I/Title V document 

incorporates, as Title I SO2 SIP 

conditions, FHR’s SIP obligations which 

had previously been listed in the FHR 

Order. This is approvable because those 

conditions have already been approved 

into Minnesota’s SO2 SIP and are merely 

being moved into the FHR joint Title I/ 

Title V document to provide the source 

with a single enforceable document. 

Upon the effective date of EPA approval 

of the Title I SO2 SIP conditions into the 

FHR SIP, the Order will be revoked as 

stipulated in a May 1, 2015, 

Administrative Order from MPCA. As 

part of this action, EPA is approving the 

revocation of the Order from the 

Minnesota SO2 SIP. 

C. Miscellaneous Revisions 

Finally, Minnesota is requesting that 

EPA approve several changes to the 

existing SIP for FHR. These changes 

include: 

—Changing ‘‘company’’ to ‘‘permittee’’ 

which is acceptable because moving 

the pertinent Title I SO2 SIP 

conditions from the Order to the FHR 

permit means the term to describe 

FHR would change to reflect the 

move. 

—Amendments to allow the use of ultralow sulfur diesel, which can be 

considered fuel oil, to be combusted 

at FHR. This revision clarifies the 

rule, and is acceptable. 

—Removing operating hour limits on 

diesel powered units because, with 

the availability of ultra-low sulfur 

diesel, these units qualify as 

insignificant sources of SO2. 

Therefore the operating hours limits 

on these units are no longer required. 

This revision is approvable. 

—Inclusion of the phrase ‘‘in 

conjunction with oxidation gases from 

OSWTP equipment’’ to indicate that 

the oil separation and waste treatment 

plant gases, which are allowed to be 

combusted from one oxidizer at a 

time, are able to be combusted along 

with natural gas. This amendment 

merely clarifies the requirement, and 

is acceptable. 

—Changing ‘continuous monitoring 

system (CMS)’ to ‘continuous 

emission monitoring system (CEMS)’, 

and by adding a total sulfur CEMS on 

the 45-unit mix drum as an operating 

condition. The revision and addition 

are approvable because they clarify 

the rule language, and the addition of 

the CEMS on the 45-unit mix drum 

helps FHR more accurately quantify 

the sulfur emissions from the unit. 

—Inclusion of more restrictive language 

that indicates the flare system is to be 

used only for unplanned and 

infrequent events resulting from 

malfunctions. The amended language 

also excludes flaring gases from 

normal operation, including gases 

from scheduled startups and 

shutdowns of refinery process units. 

This amendment is acceptable since it 

clarifies the condition’s applicability 

and creates more stringent conditions 

for flare use at FHR. 

—Removing the Merox process 

incinerator from the Title I SO2 SIP 

conditions because the Merox process 

incinerator was decommissioned and 

removed. The removal of the unit was 

approved by EPA in a prior 

rulemaking (78 FR 28501). The 

conditions were also amended to add 

the new ATS unit, which will be 

discussed in more detail later in this 

document. These revisions are 

acceptable because SO2 emissions 

will be reduced at the facility as a 

result of these changes. 

—Replacing the phrase ‘‘total reduced 

sulfur CMS’’ with ‘‘reduced sulfur 

and total sulfur CEMS,’’ reflecting the 

more comprehensive fuel gas sulfur 

continuous emission monitoring 

system installed at the facility. This 

revision is approvable. 

—Replacing the acronym ‘‘CMS’’ with 

‘‘CEMS,’’ which is approvable 

because it clarifies that the acronym 

stands for a continuous emission 

monitoring system. Continuous 

monitoring requirements were also 

amended to include language to show 

that FHR will maintain a CEMS for 

the 45-unit mix drum that will 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 41449 

measure total sulfur from the mix 

drum fuel gas stream, and that the 

CEMS will provide a continuous 

record of measurement in parts per 

million. This revision is approvable 

because it ensures that the 45-unit 

mix drum will be comprehensively 

monitored for sulfur emissions. 

Lastly, this section was revised to 

clarify the list of fuels that would 

require contract guarantees for H2S 

and heat content for compliance 

demonstration purposes, which is 

approvable because it clarifies the 

requirement for the facility. 

—Updating the language of the quarterly 

reporting requirements to reflect 

current emissions monitoring and 

report submittal requirements. This 

revision is acceptable because it 

clarifies what FHR must submit in its 

reporting to MPCA. 

—Throughout the joint document, the 

term ‘‘the Company’’ has been 

replaced with ‘‘the Permittee’’ which 

is acceptable because it reflects the 

location of FHR’s Title I SO2 SIP 

conditions within the joint document 

instead of within Orders. 

—In the portions of the joint document 

dealing with continuous monitoring 

requirements and recordkeeping 

requirements, references to the term 

‘‘hydrogen sulfide’’ have been 

replaced with ‘‘sulfur content’’ to 

reflect the more comprehensive 

monitoring strategy approved for 

FHR. 

—Requirements for fuel gas SO2

emissions from the 41- and 45-unit 

mix drums have been made Title I 

SO2 SIP conditions, including use of 

SO2 CEMS monitoring systems and 

associated recordkeeping 

requirements. The revisions are 

acceptable because the new CEMS 

monitor sulfur emissions more 

comprehensively, providing a more 

accurate analysis of FHR’s SO2

emissions from the 41- and 45-unit 

mix drums. In a related revision, 

continuous monitoring requirements 

for H2S in SIP emission units have 

been revised to become total reduced 

sulfur, which is approvable because 

the new monitors more 

comprehensively indicate SO2

emissions from these units. It should 

be noted that H2S monitoring required 

for new source performance standards 

(NSPS) for petroleum refineries are 

not affected by these revisions as H2S 

monitoring will continue for these 

units in addition to the 

comprehensive sulfur monitoring 

described above. 

—Removal of H2S CMS requirements 

from FHR’s Title I SO2 SIP, because 

the new SO2 and total sulfur CEMS 

supersede the need for H2S CMSs for 

the facility and because the H2S 

monitor requirements will remain as 

non-SIP level requirements in order to 

meet the NSPS for petroleum 

refineries. Therefore, this revision is 

approvable. 

—The H2S 3-hour rolling average limit 

for the 45H6 stack has been made a 

Title I SO2 SIP condition, which is 

approvable because the condition 

becomes permanent and federally 

enforceable. 

—Language has been removed from the 

SO2 limits for the #1 Vac Heater, #1 

Crude Heater atmospheric distillation 

unit, and #1 and #2 Coker Heaters that 

had indicated the limits were effective 

as of EPA’s approval of the ninth 

revision to the Order (which EPA 

approved on May 15, 2013 at 78 FR 

28501). Because the revision simply 

removes language that is no longer 

necessary, the revision is acceptable. 

—The recordkeeping requirements for 

start and stop times for emissions 

units 032, 033, 037, and 038 (Steam/ 

Air Heater Decoking units 21H–1, 

21H–2, 23H–1, and 23H–2, 

respectively) have been made Title I 

SO2 SIP conditions. This is acceptable 

because it allows recordkeeping 

requirements for these units to be 

federally enforceable. 

—The diesel fuel certification 

recordkeeping requirement for the 

plan air compressor diesel engine has 

been made a Title I SO2 SIP condition, 

and a typo was corrected in the 

requirement. These revisions are 

approvable because it allows federal 

enforceability of recordkeeping to 

show FHR uses ultra-low sulfur diesel 

fuel in the plant air compressor diesel 

engine. 

—An amendment to the requirements 

for the Oil Separation and Waste 

Treatment Plant to streamline the 

requirements for burning natural gas 

in conjunction with oxidation of gases 

from the treatment plant equipment. 

The revision does not decrease the 

stringency of the requirements but 

makes the requirements easier to 

understand, and is therefore 

acceptable. 

—Requirements for Boiler B–10, 

including Title I SO2 SIP conditions, 

have been removed from the FHR SIP 

because the boiler was never 

installed. This revision is acceptable 

because the source that the regulation 

is meant to address does not exist and 

will not exist. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving a revision to the SIP 

for FHR, as submitted by MPCA on May 

1, 2015. The revision will consolidate 

existing permanent and enforceable SO2

SIP conditions into the facility’s joint 

Title I/Title V SIP document and 

simultaneously remove the existing FHR 

Order from the SIP. We are publishing 

this action without prior proposal 

because we view this as a 

noncontroversial amendment and 

anticipate no adverse comments. 

However, in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register publication, we 

are publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposal to approve the 

state plan if relevant adverse written 

comments are filed. This rule will be 

effective August 26, 2016 without 

further notice unless we receive relevant 

adverse written comments by July 27, 

2016. If we receive such comments, we 

will withdraw this action before the 

effective date by publishing a 

subsequent document that will 

withdraw the final action. All public 

comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on the proposed action. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. If we do not receive any 

comments, this action will be effective 

August 26, 2016. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of the Minnesota 

Regulations described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section of this preamble for more 

information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
41450 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 123 / Monday, June 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by August 26, 2016. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register, rather than file 

an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: June 21, 2016. 

Robert Kaplan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 52.1220, the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by revising the entry for 

‘‘Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.1220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MINNESOTA SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS

Name of source Permit No. 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA 

approval 

date 

Comments 

*******

Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, 

LLC.

03700011–012 03/17/15 06/27/16, [Insert Federal Register 

citation].

Only conditions cited as ‘‘Title I 

Condition: 40 CFR Section 50.4, 

SO2 SIP; Title I Condition: 40 

CFR pt. 52, subp. Y’’. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–15038 Filed 6–24–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES