alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6133

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing, 
   implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule, entitled ``Safe and 
 Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements for Titles IV-E and IV-
                                  B''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2023

  Mr. Brecheen (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
Moore of Alabama, Mr. Burlison, and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing, 
   implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule, entitled ``Safe and 
 Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements for Titles IV-E and IV-
                                  B''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Religious Freedom for 
Foster Families Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RULEMAKING.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services may not finalize, 
implement, or enforce the proposed rule, entitled ``Safe and 
Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements for Titles IV-E and IV-
B'' (88 Fed. Reg. 66752; published September 28, 2023), or any 
substantially similar rule.
                                 <all>
```
Efran J. FIGUEROA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 24, 2018

Efran J. Figueroa, Lake City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Grant of Extension of Time PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22
- 0538 IN THE MATTER OF A.J.W. and O.J.J., Youths in Need of Care. **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENS ION OF TIME**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s m oti on for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant K.J. is granted an extension of time until December 19, 2022, to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         155,306
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          13,931
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                70,529
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    111,242
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,793,616
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,415,562
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,514,805
<SHORT-TERM>                                   139,253
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            128,264
<LONG-TERM>                                    289,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,415,562
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 98,664
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,035
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,804
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               113,503
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              38,198
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,446
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           56,057
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    7,300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 56,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,580
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      46,580
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     63,890
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                38,047
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,366
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,290
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,271
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            27,271
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ J. Donald Boggus, Jr.            
| |  | J. Donald Boggus, Jr.                
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | May 4, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Carl REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50048

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 **

Filed March 14, 2017

Jean-Claude Andre, Assistant U.S. Attorney, DOJ—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Robert J. Keenan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appel-lee

*627Kurt David Hermansen, Esquire, Law-Office of Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LÉAYY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

John Carl Reynolds appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting and mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a) and 1341. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

Reynolds contends that the district court erred by applying a sentencing enhancement for his abuse of a position of trust under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3. The government contends that this claim is barred by a valid appeal waiver. Reviewing de novo, we conclude that the provision of the appeal waiver stating that Reynolds waives the right to appeal “the procedures and calculations used to determine ... the sentence” unambiguously encompasses this claim. *See United States v. Harris,*628 F.3d 1203, 1205-06 (9th Cir. 2011).

•Reynolds next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Reynolds’s sentence. *See Gall v. United States,*552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The high-end sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the offense and Reynolds’s history of fraudulent behavior. *See Gall,*552 U.S. at 51, 128 S.Ct. 586.

DISMISSED in part; AFFIRMED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Golden Health Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended September 30, 2001 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Hoi-ho Kiu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Maggie Kwok, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, theconsolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented andthe consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

 

 
|   | /s/ Hoi-ho Kiu          |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Hoi-ho Kiu              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | December 18, 2005  |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Maggie Kwok         |   |
|   | Maggie Kwok             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | December 18, 2005  |

 

----
William L. STRMISKA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-604

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 6, 2018 Rehearing Denied March 15, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Corey Lavon CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1227

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Levine, Conner and Forst, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Edwin Orlando CABALLERO-GUARDADO, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-10280 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Date Filed: 12/20/2016

James Wesley Hendrix, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Edwin Orlando Caballero-Guardado, Pro Se

Before DENNIS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edwin Orlando Caballero-Guardado has moved for leave to withdraw ánd has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). During the pendency of the appeal, Caballero-Guardado completed his 8-month term of imprisonment and has been deported. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, *see, e.g., United States v. Prieto,*801 F.3d 547, 549 n.1 (5th Cir. 2015).

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir, R. 47.5.4.
#### Lorenzo Leon MONDRAGON, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 14-71933

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted September 26, 2017 *

FILED OCTOBER 3, 2017

Christopher John Stender, Esquire, Federal Immigration Counselors, AZ, PC, Phoenix, AZ, Petitioner.

Melissa Katherine Lott, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is ■ suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lorenzo Leon Mondragon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to suppress evidence and terminate removal proceedings, and ordering him removed. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo the denial of a motion to suppress and questions of law. *Martinez-Medina v. Holder,*673 F.3d 1029, 1033 (9th Cir. 2011). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err in denying Leon Mondragon’s motion to suppress evidence and terminate removal proceedings, or iii sustaining the removability charge, because Sam*ayoa-Martinez v. Holder*forecloses his contention that his statements to immigration officials at the border were obtained in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 287.3(c). 558 F.3d 897, 901-02 (9th Cir. 2009). Leon Mondragon urges us to reconsider our holding in *Samayoa-Martinez,*but a three-judge panel cannot overrule circuit precedent in the absence of an intervening *340decision from a higher court or en banc decision of this court. *See Avagyan v. Holder,*646 F.3d 672, 677 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Kerri L. SCARRY, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Duncan J. SCARRY, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1545

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 23, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted. The trial court is ordered to strike the husband's notice for trial and to remove the case from the trial docket, as the wife's motion to strike the husband's reply, a motion directed to the last pleading served, has not yet been disposed of. See Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.440 ; Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA2015). Because we are confident that the circuit court will promptly comply with this ruling, we withhold formal issuance of the writ. The wife's motion to strike is denied as moot.

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Philip M. Wall, the Chief
Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Philip M. Wall                    
|                        |  |  |  | Philip M. Wall Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,550
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         241,285
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                37,408
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     45,134
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,694,031
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,277,736
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,260,991
<SHORT-TERM>                                   358,129
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            104,794
<LONG-TERM>                                    289,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,208
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,277,736
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 96,442
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,754
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,391
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               104,587
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              34,084
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,056
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           44,531
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,606
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 54,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,602
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      25,105
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,995)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.29
<LOANS-NON>                                     48,312
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,999
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,969
<RECOVERIES>                                       607
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,520
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,520
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial information extracted from SEC
     Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
     statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000883946           
<NAME>                        TREEV INC
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,103)
<INVENTORY>                                        691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,495
<PP&E>                                           7,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,504)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,631
<SALES>                                         13,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,288
<CGS>                                            7,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,774)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,774)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.24)
        


</TABLE>