alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
arlp_Ex10_57


		
			Exhibit 10.57
		

		
			ALLDALE MINERALS, LP
		

		
			JOINDER AGREEMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dated effective as of January 3, 2019
		

		
			 
		

		
			Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AllDale Minerals, LP dated November 10, 2014, as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AllDale Minerals, LP, dated effective as of January 3, 2019 (as amended, the "Partnership Agreement"), by and among AllDale Minerals Management, LLC and the Limited Partners party thereto.  Capitalize terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Partnership Agreement.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			Alliance Royalty, LLC hereby joins in and adopts the Partnership Agreement as a Limited Partner thereunder and agrees to be bound by the terms thereof as a Limited Partner.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Joinder Agreement to be executed effective as of the date first above written.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						ALLIANCE ROYALTY, LLC

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:  

					
					
						/s/  R. Eberley Davis

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						R. Eberley Davis, Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

				



		
			 
		

		
			
		

		
			


		 


 



		

		
			ALLDALE MINERALS, LP
		

		
			JOINDER AGREEMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dated effective as of January 3, 2019
		

		
			 
		

		
			Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AllDale Minerals, LP dated November 10, 2014, as amended by that certain First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of AllDale Minerals, LP, dated effective as of January 3, 2019 (as amended, the "Partnership Agreement"), by and among AllDale Minerals Management, LLC and the Limited Partners party thereto.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Partnership Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			AllRoy GP, LLC hereby joins in and adopts the Partnership Agreement as the General Partner thereunder and agrees to be bound by the terms thereof as the General Partner.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Joinder Agreement to be executed effective as of the date first above written.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						ALLROY GP, LLC

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:  

					
					
						/s/  R. Eberley Davis

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						R. Eberley Davis, Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
<PAGE>   1
June 26, 2001


Mr. Frank ten Brink
Waste Systems, Inc.
28161 N. Keith Drive
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045


VIA FACSIMILE:  (847) 367-9462


Dear Mr. Ten Brink:

         As the Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated October 1,
1998 in the principle amount of $5,629,378.97, payable to Waste Systems, Inc.
("WSI") will mature July 1st, 2001, we are requesting to renegotiate and extend
the note under the following terms to October 1, 2001.

Proposed Terms:

a)   Maturity. The Note will mature October 1, 2001. In the event the parties
     mutually agree on a future repayment schedule prior to October 1, 2001, WSI
     is willing to negotiate a one year term until October 1, 2002.

b)   Repayment of principal: For WSI to lower the interest rate and to extend
     the note, 3CI will repay $400,000 in principal prior to June 28, 2001.

c)   Revolver Facility: WSI will allow 3CI to draw up to $100,000 from a new
     revolver facility, which facility will also expire October 1, 2001.

d)   Interest Rate, starting July 1, 2001. Wall Street Journal "Money Rates"
     (Southwestern Edition) Prime Rate plus 1.5% per annum not to exceed 13%.


<PAGE>   2

Mr. Frank ten Brink
June 26, 2001
Page 2


e)   Interest Payments. Interest payable quarterly in arrears on the first day
     of the succeeding quarter.

f)   Financial Covenant. The Second Amended and Restated Note will contain a
     minimum EBITDA of $1,500,000 for the six months ending September 30, 2001.
     Such covenant will be measured on a trailing six months basis. If the
     minimum EBITDA goal is not obtained warrants will be issued based on a
     market price of $0.36 (market price as of June 26, 2000) and in an amount
     intended to equal 5% of the principal balance for the quarter ending in
     question. The Note as amended will not contain a minimum net income
     covenant nor a minimum shareholder equity covenant currently contained in
     the Note subparagraph (h) and (I) on page 3 of the 3CI Note.

g)   Warrants. If the minimum EBITDA goal is not obtained warrants will issued
     based on a market price of $0.36 (market price as of June 26, 2001).

h)   Confirmation of Existing Liens. The Company will ratify and confirm all
     existing liens in favor of WSI securing the Note.

i)   Payment of WSI Fees and Expenses. The Company shall pay all of WSI's
     reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by it in connection with the
     negotiation and documentation of the Proposed Note and related documents
     and instruments.

j)   Waiver of Existing Defaults. WSI will waive, if applicable, all existing
     events of default under the Note through January 1, 2001.

Please indicate your acceptance by signing and faxing back to me.

Yours truly,

/s/
Otley Smith
CEO, 3CI


/s/____________________
Frank J.M. ten Brink
Vice President
Waste Systems, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald M. DiNella, the Chief Financial Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.

Date: July 28, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ RONALD M. DINELLA  
|Ronald M. DiNella      
|                       
|Chief Financial Officer
|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15



November 12, 1999

Catalina Marketing Corporation
11300 9th Street North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33716



Catalina Marketing Corporation:

We are aware that Catalina Marketing Corporation has incorporated by reference
in its Registration Statement Nos. 33-46793, 33-77100, 33-82456, 333-07525,
333-13335 and 333-86905, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1999, which includes our report dated October 13, 1999, covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), that report is not considered a part of
the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-----------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODOLFO GUZMAN-MARTINEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72450 

Agency No. A073-856-793 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Rodolfo Guzman-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for deferral of removal under 

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

§ 1252. We consider questions of law de novo, and we review factual findings for 

substantial evidence. Guan v. Barr, 925 F.3d 1022, 1031 (9th Cir. 2019). We 

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Guzman-Martinez failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to 

Mexico. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 140, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); Delgado-Ortiz v. 

Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1152 (9th Cir. 2010) (generalized evidence of violence and 

crime in Mexico was not particular to the petitioner and insufficient to establish 

eligibility for CAT relief). In determining whether Guzman-Martinez met his 

burden of proof, the agency properly considered the lack of evidence of any past 

torture. See Mairena v. Barr, 917 F.3d 1119, 1125 (9th Cir. 2019) (evidence of 

past torture is relevant in assessing whether torture is more likely than not).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,358
<PP&E>                                         208,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,570
<BONDS>                                          1,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,506
<SALES>                                         72,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,614
<CGS>                                           30,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,703
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1001
VARTKES GARABED, a/k/a Vartkes Garabed Nazarian, Petitioner, versus BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration & Naturalization Service. (A31-318-677) Submitted: May 31, 1996 Decided: July 26, 1996 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vartkes Garabed, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Peter Lindemann, Sr.,Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Jennifer Helene Zawid, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Given this disposition, we deny Nazarian's motion for a stay of deportation pending our resolution of his appeal. We therefore deny the INS's motion to clarify its opposition to Nazarian's motion as moot. 2 PER CURIAM: Vartkes Garabed, a/k/a Vartkes Garabed Nazarian, appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision denying him relief from deportation under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. We have reviewed the BIA's decision adopting the immigrationjudge's reasoning and denying relief and discern no abuse of discretion or other error meriting reversal. See Gandarillas-Zambrana v. Board of Immigration Appeals , 44 F.3d 1251, 1259 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 3203, 3239 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1995) (No. 94-1720). Accordingly, we affirm. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Markeith LAWS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4636

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 16, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 60 days.

Counsel for appellant has filed appellant's brief asserting no arguable merit in this case. Appellant may within thirty days, if (s)he wishes to do so, file with this court an additional brief calling the court's attention to any matters (s)he feels should be considered in connection with this appeal, and shall at the same time serve a copy of the brief on appellee, which is Attorney General, 3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida, 33607, and appellant's counsel, and certify on the original that a copy has been served on such offices.

IN ORDER FOR THE ADDITIONAL BRIEF TO BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT, IT SHALL BE SERVED AND SO CERTIFIED AS STATED ABOVE.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 235 SSM 24

The People &c.,

 Appellant,

 v.

Robert L. Ingram,

 Respondent.

Submitted by David A. Heraty, for appellant.

Submitted by Sherry A. Chase, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination as to whether police have reasonable

- 1 -
- 2 - SSM No. 24

suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and

fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627, 628 [2002]). Where, as here,

there exists record support for the Appellate Division's

resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court's

further review.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges

Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided December 16, 2014

- 2 -
Luz SANCHEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1291

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### PARK PROPERTIES ASSOCIATES, L.P., Valentine Properties Associates, L.P., Plaintiffs-Appellants St. John’s I Associates, L.P., Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

2015-5102

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 15, 2017

Thomas A. Gentile, Wilson Elser Mos-kowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Florham Park, NJ, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

John Jacob Todor, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr., Kenneth M. Dintzer.

(Dyk, Mayer, and Taranto, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
STATE of Louisiana v. Charles LANDRUM

NO. 2017-KO-1783

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Supreme Court of Louisiana May 25, 2018

Denied.
Greg E. ROBBINS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2204

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1

       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                      2594509
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               1726152
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  24327
<INVENTORY>                                                 5237351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            9562424
<PP&E>                                                      1146712 
<DEPRECIATION>                                               617822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             15013171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1912330
<BONDS>                                                     1131327      
<COMMON>                                                      44503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                    8500
<OTHER-SE>                                                 11585190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               15013171
<SALES>                                                     4979043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            4979043
<CGS>                                                       3671153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               2187571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              (1087)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (45805)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (908408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (908408)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (945296)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.21)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 150

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish Workers' Memorial 
                       Day as a Federal holiday.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Mr. Norcross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish Workers' Memorial 
                       Day as a Federal holiday.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workers' Memorial Day''.

SEC. 2. WORKERS' MEMORIAL DAY.

    Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to the Birthday of Martin Luther 
King, Jr., the following:
            ``Workers' Memorial Day.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX PARTE Taylor CLARK

CR-16-0264

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Transferred to Sumter Cir. Ct.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules; notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules will hold a meeting on April 28, 2022 in Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public for                               ( print page 8039)                            observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *https://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

April 28, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bridget Healy, Esq., Acting Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: February 8, 2022.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2022-02960 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman Blashka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Norman
Blashka


December
      2, 2009
            Norman
      Blashka


Chief Financial Officer