alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Part 391
          - [Docket No. FMCSA-2019-0049]
          - RIN 2126-AC21

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        In a final rule published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 21, 2022, FMCSA amended its regulations to permit individuals who do not satisfy, with the worse eye, either the existing distant visual acuity standard with corrective lenses or the field of vision standard, or both, to be physically qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce under specified conditions. The document included an incorrect date for grandfathered drivers who participated in a vision waiver study program to come into compliance with the provisions in the final rule.                    

# DATES:

This correction is effective March 22, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division, FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, (202) 366-4001,                         *fmcsamedical@dot.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2022-01021 appearing on page 3419 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of January 21, 2022 (87 FR 3390), the following corrections are made:                

§ 391.64 

On page 3419, in the third column, in § 391.64, in paragraph (b) introductory text and paragraph (b)(4), “March 22, 2022” is corrected to read “March 22, 2023”.

Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87.

Larry W. Minor,

Associate Administrator for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-02758 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
Lucinda Pickett ROBINSON v. ESTATE OF Joseph ROBINSON

1150458

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00708

- CR

Enrique GONZALEZ , Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- CRD

- 36

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 10, 2014.

_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: File Formats not supported in FDMS for Federal Register Document EPA-R04- 0AR-2013-0147; Approval and Promulgation oflmplementation Plans; Atlanta, Georgia 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; Reasonable Further Progress Plan FROM: Sara Waterson $'.J Regulatory Development Section TO: File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2013-0147 This memorandum is to document the following files from Georgia Environmental Protection Division are unable to be loaded onto FDMS due to file format. These files can be viewed at the Region 4 Office. Please see the Docket section ofthe Federal Register notice for information on viewing the hard docket. 02 and 08 network database 20-county
_RFP_targets_and_emissions_rev2 20-county
_RFP_targets_and_emissions _rev3 exhibit_7 _mobile_files_ozone _rfp senior_ early _progress

Internet Address (URL) • http//www epa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Mimmum 30% Postconsumer)
Donald E. WILSON, DOC #T51531, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3894

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 23, 2018.

Donald E. Wilson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
From: "Rufa, Nathan P." <Nathan.Rufa@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Parent, Jordan J." <Jordan.Parent@alcoa.com>

Date: 01/14/2011 02:53 PM

Subject: PMACT Residual Risk Plant Information Update

Rochelle,

Please see the attached PMACT Residual Risk updated files for 

Alcoa Massena Operations and Reynolds Metals Co.

Each plant has been updated/revised with:

Fence Lines (KMZ files)

Actual HAP emissions (Category HAP’s spreadsheet) Release 

Point Parameters such as stack height, diameter, 

latitude/longitude, etc. (Release Point spreadsheet)

Please let us know if you need anything else. Thank you.

Nathan Rufa

Senior Environmental Engineer

Alcoa Primary Metals

Massena Operations

Park Avenue East / PO Box 150

Massena, NY 13662

Tel: 315-764-4285

Fax: 315-764-4460

nathan.rufa@alcoa.com

 (See attached file: Alcoa CategoryHAPs_NEI39458 Final 1-6-

11.xls)(See attached file: Alcoa Massena West Fenceline 12-17-

10.kmz)(See attached

file: Reynolds Metals Co. ReleasePoint_NEI46970 Final 1-6-

11.xls)(See attached file: Reynolds CategoryHAPs_NEI46970 

Final 1-6-11.xls)(See attached file: Reynolds Massena 

Fenceline 12-17-10.kmz)

Page 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Allen J. Bernstein, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | /s/ ALLEN J.  BERNSTEIN |   |
|                     | Allen J.  Bernstein |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Allen MINGO

NO. 2017-KO-1894

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
Joe Allen WILSON, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Date: ,July 26, 2013 

Meeting on GHG Regulations 

Name Organization 

I ~0 )~ ~7 =t~- 3 3ctf 

: ----------------l 

-1---J--u-=-m_ w_A ____ _..;..! -.':.. ;_=- .L_~ 3o 1. - tJt; l\J 1 

i ~ 11-2 - ::2,5o I 

I 

.o~s -:::c:e~ _ tJo~ -7tlF-~o¥'? _J ! I 

; ~Ntl /1uPFvl'iAl- LvulttA- ~<9~97~~~ ! 

Mttr }~ ~ ~ ..-c_ -r;-V ! c9-0d- (p ~7 s 9 bk i ~ ! ! 

, :J ... lM ___ fiJ)_o_SS __ ___________________ b)_A __________________ ___ .:AS 3 ~ J:SQ :: ~t 

' <.. ~r-. ! -II -a\ i 

~~~fL~ tb_!_~ _ _ h,~~UJeJ- .iv3- .-"'b1-s<l-/o _ _j tJ ~ /i<-un-E/2 rl- F L - CJ-o ~ {1?- So¥'1 I 

~;A fvk.{ { ,:Y.lL ...... _ -- ~l .. V..Nft= ____ _____________ _ 

.81?. ft ....... 

-- ·-·· ' 

L -· • - --- ------·---l-·- --· I ·-------i I 

! I - ... ···- .......... ----- - . . .. ... ..... '~' ........... ·-··--· -·---------· ......... --··--·1 

I 

I 

! . i 

! 

i 

r --------------------------.. -------- . I
#### Keith Bryan WEBB, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven FIGIEL, Acting Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and United States Parole Commission, Respondent.

No. 17-6555

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 15, 2017

Decided: September 26, 2017

Keith Bryan Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Erin Carter Ti-son, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Bryan Webb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of. the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons *251stated by the district court. *Webb v. Figiel,*No. 5:16-ev-00044-FPS-RWT, 2017 WL 1147470 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2017). We deny Webb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Steven HARRIMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0022

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Roseann Bolasny, Appellant. BNY-ESI & Company, Inc., Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 767]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 8, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a supervisor in the accounts payable department of a brokerage firm. She became the subject of an investigation after two of her subordinates accused her of sexual harassment. Claimant was informed of the investigation by the employer’s outside legal counsel and was instructed not to discuss the accusations with either of her accusers. She nonetheless discussed the matter with one of them and then escorted her to the employer’s human resources department where the woman denied having made an accusation. Claimant was discharged for violating the explicit instructions not to discuss the matter with her accusers. The Unemployment Insurance *658Appeal Board ruled that she was disqualified from receiving benefits because she had lost her employment due to misconduct. We affirm.

A claimant’s knowing failure to comply with an employer’s policies may be construed as disqualifying misconduct, particularly when such failure could jeopardize the employer’s best interests *(see Matter of Cruz [Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 813 [2001]; *Matter of Roman [Commissioner of Labor],*277 AD2d 589 [2000]). The record before us discloses that claimant was guilty of disqualifying misconduct when she disobeyed the directive of the employer’s attorney not to discuss the investigation with the subordinates who had made the accusations against her. Claimant’s conduct had the potential of jeopardizing the employer’s best interests by making it vulnerable to a claim of retaliatory discrimination on the part of the employee with whom claimant discussed the matter *(see*Executive Law § 296 [7]; *Matter of Apiado [North Shore Univ. Hosp.—Commissioner of Labor],*304 AD2d 884, 885 [2003], *appeal dismissed*100 NY2d 614 [2003]; *Matter of Mallard [Sweeney],*245 AD2d 932 [1997]). Under the circumstances presented here, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision finding claimant guilty of disqualifying misconduct.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, David R. Allison, Chief Executive Officer of Compuprint, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Compuprint, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on our evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 14,  2005

                                             /s/ David R. Allison
                                             --------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of NaviSite, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                         -----------------------------
<S>                                                <C>
Avasta, Inc.                                       California
ClearBlue Technologies Management, Inc.            Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Chicago-Wells, Inc.         Delaware
Clear Blue Technologies/Las Vegas, Inc.            Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Los Angeles, Inc.           Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Milwaukee, Inc.             Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Oak Brook, Inc.             Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Vienna, Inc.                Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/Dallas, Inc.                Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/New York, Inc.              Delaware
ClearBlue Technologies/San Francisco, Inc.         Delaware
Conxion Corporation                                California
Intrepid Acquisition Corp.                         Delaware
Lexington Acquisition Corp.                        Delaware
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Mortons Restaurant Group, Inc. (Mortons) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Baldwin, the Chief Executive Officer of Mortons, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mortons.

Date: October 27, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ THOMAS J. BALDWIN  
|Thomas J. Baldwin      
|Chief Executive Officer
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State of Connecticut and

Devon Power LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order 8181A

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Devon Power LLC

('Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order

8181 A and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual agreement, further modify said

modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ('Regulations) are hereby

replaced with May I, 2010.

2. Any references to October 1

51 with respect to the date by which the Respondents shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits (DERCS) and/or allowances

for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs, shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,2010, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order 8181A and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent shall

comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-22(d)(2)(A) of

the Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order 8181A, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street· Hartford. CT 06106-5127

http://w ww.CLgovIdep

All Equal Opporlllllity Employer
Devon Power LLC 2 Trading Agreement and Order 8181A

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

Date:------------'-----

Devon Power LLC --, L

Signature: -----:."h/--£-p'-'''--'''~------ . ;:J1 .

Narne: __",(,...::~,--:>_,-_,_<?' __t_~_._ ...... 14----'5==----5__

Title: __-'f<----'L/ll-J __'_/J1,_'.4;-J_;?-_G-'C_7- _

L./-/:s _ 2-c 01

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order. 9;;0 ,4 - 'R-- 04- - 2.(- .J..u'i

Gar ose Date

Director

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau ofAir Management
#### Dennis James BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lt. A. BANKS; Dr. Inder Jeet Singh Gujral, Independent Contractor Doctor Hired by D.O.C., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6191

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 14, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

*245Dennis James Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Ramon Rodriguez, III, RAWLS, MCNELIS & MITCHELL, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis James Brown appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Brown v. Banks,*No. 3:15-cv-00747-HEH-RCY, 2017 WL 427492 (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*