alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6132 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6132

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate a 
mandatory consumer product safety standard with respect to retractable 
                                awnings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Awning Safety Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY STANDARD FOR RETRACTABLE AWNINGS.

    (a) Consumer Product Safety Standard Required.--Not later than 18 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Consumer 
Product Safety Commission shall promulgate, under section 553 of title 
5, United States Code, a final consumer product safety standard for 
fixed and freestanding retractable awnings within the jurisdiction of 
the Commission to protect against the risk of death or serious injury 
related to the hazards associated with such awnings, including the risk 
of death or serious injury related to the awning unexpectedly opening 
and striking a person while removing the bungee tie-downs for the cover 
of the awning.
    (b) CPSC Determination of Scope.--The Consumer Product Safety 
Commission shall specify the types of retractable awning devices within 
the jurisdiction of the Commission that are within the scope of 
subsection (a) as part of a standard promulgated under this section, as 
reasonably necessary to protect against hazards associated with 
retractable awnings.
    (c) Treatment of Standard.--A consumer product safety standard 
promulgated under subsection (a) shall be treated as a consumer product 
safety rule promulgated under sections 7 and 9 of the Consumer Product 
Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2056 and 2058).

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6132

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to promulgate a 
mandatory consumer product safety standard with respect to retractable 
                                awnings.
```
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.10.2



AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO THE
BRIGHTHOUSE SERVICES, LLC
VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


The BRIGHTHOUSE SERVICES, LLC VOLUNTARY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (the “Plan”) is hereby amended, effective as of November 1, 2018, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 2.3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “Annual Variable Incentive Compensation Plan” and replacing it with “Short-Term Incentive Plan”.




		
	2.
	Section 2.14 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




		
	“2.14
	“Officer” shall mean each individual who is employed by the Company with a paygrade of (i) CEO; (ii) EG; (iii) 15 or above; or (iv)14 who has eligible  compensation as that term is defined under BSP for the 12-month period of October 1 through September 30 immediately preceding an Open Enrollment Period or for such other 12-month period otherwise designated by the Plan Administrator, equal to or in excess of a dollar threshold established by the Plan Administrator in its discretion for each such 12-month period. The dollar threshold will be communicated to Eligible Employees during the applicable Open Enrollment Period.”




		
	3.
	The first clause of Section 2.22 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “and designated by the Company as a wholesaler” and replacing it with “by the Company as a sales grade employee who is eligible for variable compensation”.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed by the Plan Administrator on this 28 day of December 2018. 


    
Plan Administrator




/s/ Micah Dowling
____________________________________
Micah Dowling






Witness: _/s/ Elise Milito______________________            


1
#### Mary S. Jones, Respondent, v Arnold Campbell et al., Appellants.

[770 NYS2d 645]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglas, J.), dated June 18, 2002, which, upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant C & A Enterprises of New York, Ltd., for failure to establish a prima facie case against it, and upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $42,446.95.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant C & A Enterprises of New York, Ltd., and substituting therefor a provision dismissing the complaint as to that defendant; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is granted.

When determining a motion pursuant to CPLR 4401, the trial court must decide whether the plaintiff presented a prima facie case, and the motion should be granted if no rational jury could find for the plaintiff based upon the evidence presented *(see Krakofsky v Fox-Rizzi,*273 AD2d 277, 278 [2000]). Here, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the trial court should have granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant C & A Enterprises of New York, Ltd., for failure to establish a prima facie case against it *(see generally Krakofsky v Fox-Rizzi, supra).*

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Cozier, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: April 1, 2008 /s/ STEVEN A. KRIEGSMAN   Steven A. Kriegsman   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to CytRx Corporation and will be retained by CytRxCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anExhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1536 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1536

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include all members of the 
Armed Forces in the definition of ``independent student'' for purposes 
 of determining the eligibility of such members for Federal financial 
                  assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2021

Mr. Reschenthaler (for himself, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania, 
and Mr. Trone) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to include all members of the 
Armed Forces in the definition of ``independent student'' for purposes 
 of determining the eligibility of such members for Federal financial 
                  assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving College Affordability for 
our Guard and Reserve Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF INDEPENDENT STUDENT.

    Section 480(d) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087vv(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (I) 
                as subparagraphs (F) through (J), respectively; and
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the 
                following:
                    ``(D) is a veteran of the Armed Forces (as defined 
                in subsection (c)(1));
                    ``(E) is a member of the Armed Forces (including 
                the National Guard or Reserve) without regard to 
                whether such individual is serving on active duty;''; 
                and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``paragraph (1)(I)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)(J)''.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1433 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Helen Keller National Center for Youths 

and Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1433 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helen Keller National 

3 Center Reauthorization Act of 2022’’. 

4 SEC. 2. HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER REAUTHOR5 IZED. 

6 The first sentence of section 205(a) of the Helen Kel7 ler National Center Act (29 U.S.C. 1904(a)) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘1999 through 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2023 

9 through 2027’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 20, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**Exhibit 15**

Acknowledgement Letter of Independent Certified Public Accountants 

The Board of DirectorsCatalina Marketing Corporation 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-46793, Form S-8 No. 33-77100,Form S-8 No. 33-82456, Form S-8 No. 333-07525 and Form S-8 No. 333-86905) of Catalina Marketing Corporation of our report dated October 31, 2002, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of September 30, 2002and for the three- and six-month periods then ended of Catalina Marketing Corporation that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. 

|  |   |   |                                                                                     |
|--|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |   |   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP    
Tampa, FloridaNovember 12, 2002
  |
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 70874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8097]

Notice of Charter Renewal of the President's Emergency Plan for 
AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Scientific Advisory Board

SUMMARY: The Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator (S/GAC) 
announces the charter renewal of the PEPFAR Scientific Advisory Board 
(hereinafter referred to as ``the Board''). This charter renewal will 
take place on December 5, 2012 and will expire after two years.
    The meeting will be hosted by the Office of the U.S. Global AIDS 
Coordinator, and led by Ambassador Eric Goosby, who leads 
implementation of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief 
(PEPFAR).
    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(92), S/GAC is giving notice of the charter renewal for the PEPFAR SAB. 
The Board serves the Global AIDS Coordinator in a solely advisory 
capacity concerning scientific, implementation, and policy issues 
related to the global response to HIV/AIDS. The Board is composed of 53 
members representing academic institutions, research organizations, 
U.S. government agencies, multilateral organizations, and the private 
sector. The diversity of the Board ensures the requisite range of views 
and expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. Please see 
the SAB page of the PEPFAR Web site for information on the Board's 
activities and membership (http://www.pepfar.gov/sab/index.htm). Please 
refer to the notice published in the Federal Register on October 1, 
2010 (https://federalregister.gov/a/2010-24691) for additional 
information about the SAB.
    Please contact Amy Dubois, Acting Director of the Office of 
Research and Science, Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator at 
(202) 663-2440 or DuboisA@state.gov.

    Dated: November 6, 2012.
Amy Dubois,
Acting Director, Office of Research and Science, Office of the U.S. 
Global AIDS Coordinator, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-28772 Filed 11-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00272-CV

Novus Prime Properties, LLC

v.

Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-DCL-03184

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

the party incurring same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 8, 2024
Fw: MATS RIA for OMB Distribution 12/09 (Message 2 of 2)

12/09/2011 04:15 PM

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney -

Attached are the remaining chapters.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D.

Leader, Energy Strategies Group

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045

Cell: (919) 306-2290

Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

*********************************************************

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209_clean.docx

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209 (REDLINE).docx

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209_clean.docx

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209 (REDLINE).docxChapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209_clean.doc

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209 (REDLINE).doc

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1209_clean.doc

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBen efits_1209 (REDLINE).doc
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 3CIComplete Compliance Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Matthew D. Peiffer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)         The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 15, 2005 | /s/ Matthew D. Peiffer                            |   |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Matthew D. Peiffer                                |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and  Treasurer |

 

----
5678910

e ntration mg/LSConcentrationwithnon‐detectsshownathalfofNDvalueRockTennFlorenceMill2009through2013bymonthConcentration(mg/L)Wt tFl(MGD)01234 1/1/2009 4/1/2009 7/1/2009 10/1/2009 1/1/2010 4/1/2010 7/1/2010 10/1/2010 1/1/2011 4/1/2011 7/1/2011 10/1/2011 1/1/2012 4/1/2012 7/1/2012 10/1/2012 1/1/2013 4/1/2013 7/1/2013 10/1/2013

Conc eWastewaterFlow(MGD)
#### Wilson vs. Brandenburg.

It is error to render judgment against the defendant, by default, where the original writ has been quashed, and he has not been served with other process, nor has voluntarily appeared — the prosecution of a writ of error, to such judgment, is an appearance.

*Error to Monroe Circuit Court.*

The Hon. Ciiaeles W. Adams, Circuit Judge.

Watkins efe Gallagher, for plaintiff,

referred to *Borden et al. vs. Trustee B. E. Banh,*6 *Eng.*

Mr. Chief Justice ENGLISH

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Brandenburg brought an action of trover against Wilson, to the April term, 1854, of the Monroe Circuit Court. At the return term, upon motion, the writ was quashed, the cause continued, and an alias writ ordered. It does not appeal’, from the record before us, that any writ was afterwards issued. At the next term, a default was taken against defendant, on his failure to appear, a writ of inquiry executed, and final judgment rendered for the damages assessed by the j ury. The defendant brought error.

When the original writ was quashed, the defendant went out of court, and no judgment could regularly be rendered against him, until he was again served with process, or voluntarily entered his appearance. The judgment, by default in this case, was therefore erroneous, and must be reversed. According to the well established rule, however, the defendant has made himself a party by prosecuting the writ of error, and will be regarded as in court, on the case being remanded.
#### Tony M. STRAWDERMAN; Laurie Strawderman, Debtors-Appellants, v. Clara P. SWANSON, Trustee-Appellee.

No. 17-1420

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 23, 2017

Tony M. Strawderman, Sr., Laurie A. Strawderman, Appellants Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony M. Strawderman and Laurie Strawderman appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale of property of the bankruptcy estate. We have reviewed the record and find ho reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Strawderman v. Swanson,*No. 2:16-cv-00232-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the. decisional process.

*:AFFIRMED*
Gregory T. WHITE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0680

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 12, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Belated appeal is granted.
Walter B. PRICE v. ALABAMA ONE CREDIT UNION and William A. Lunsford

2141012

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

May 12, 2017

Bobby H. Cockrell, Jr., of Cockrell & Cockrell, Tuscaloosa, for appellant.

Robert P. Reynolds of Reynolds, Reynolds & Little, LLC, Tuscaloosa; and Gilbert C. Steindorff IV of Reynolds, Reynolds & Little, LLC, Birmingham, for appellee Alabama One Credit Union.

William P. Gray Jr., and John David Gray of Gray & Associates, LLC, Birmingham, for appellee William A. Lunsford.

DONALDSON, Judge.

This court's prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. *Ex parte Price,*244 So.3d 949 (Ala. 2017). In compliance with the supreme court's opinion, we reverse the judgment in favor of Alabama One Credit Union and William A. Lunsford, and the cause is remanded to the Tuscaloosa Circuit Court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Alabama Supreme Court.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Thompson, P.J., and Pittman, Thomas, and Moore, JJ., concur.
Joshua ARMSTRONG, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 16, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

The circuit court order under judicial review in this appeal dismissed appellant's motion for correction of jail credit without prejudice to filing a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. This circuit court order is a nonfinal, nonappealable order under the authority of Pillajo v. State, 60 So. 3d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA2011), and Lee v. State. 939 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.