alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated January 29, 2001, on the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Argonaut
Group,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated  statements  of  operations,  comprehensive  income,  shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period  ended  December
31,  2000,  incorporated  by reference  in this Form 10-K into  Argonaut  Group,
Inc.'s previously filed Form S-8 Registration  Statement File Nos. 333-43230 and
333-43228.  It  should  be  noted  that we have  not  audited  any  consolidated
financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 2000 or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



                                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


San Francisco, California
March  26, 2001
EX PARTE Vincent TIDWELL

CR-16-0729

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 21, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 8, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00609

- CV

Allison WHITE

, Appellant

v.

Jason WALSH

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 02528

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sit ting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Appellee’s motion to dismiss this appeal is denied

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of February, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kimberly S. Patmore, the Chief
Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kimberly S. Patmore
|                  |  |  |  | Kimberly S. Patmore    
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chase Remington TICKLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-6965

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 22, 2016

Chase Remington Tickle, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chase Remington Tickle seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(e)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find' that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tickle has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen Biologics, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(e) and15d – 15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 10, 2007         By:         /s/ GERALD E. BISBEE, JR.    Name:  Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.    Title:  *President and Chief Executive Officer*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard A. Ross, as Chief Financial Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the
Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 11, 2005



By:

/s/ Richard A. RossRichard A. RossChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)
**EXHIBIT 15**

**Letter from Ernst & Young LLP Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information**

The Stockholders and Boardof Directors of First Data Corporation 

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-125588,333-101883, 333-90180, 333-90182, 333-66368, 33-47234, 33-48578, 33-82826, 33-87338, 33-90992, 33-62921, 33-98724, 33-99882, 333-09017, 333-09031, 333-28857, 333-68689, 333-81691, 333-85715, 333-90719 and 333-93703; Form S-3 No. 333-120214; andForm S-4 Nos. 333-15497 and 333-105432) of First Data Corporation of our report dated August 4, 2006 (except for Note 1 as to which the date is August 22, 2006) relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of First DataCorporation that are included in its Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & YoungLLP 

Denver, Colorado 

September 12, 2006
Jimmy Lee WHEELER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3079

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 05, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Attorney General of Texas '*>&* *-

February 4, 2015

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk

1st Court of Appeals

301 Fannin Street

Houston, TX 77002

KEN PAXTON

Re: Herbert Foster Nash 0M1-00906-CR

Dear Mr. Prine:

This letter is to request the above referenced appeal files. In order to adequately

respond to the above petitioners' complaints, I need the entire appellate files in

each cause, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. Statement of facts for the trial, pre-trial and post-trial

hearing!

2. Transcripts (trial court);

3. Appellate briefs, appellant's and appellee's initial and responsive or

supplementary;

4. Opinion(s) of the 1st Court of Appeals;

5. Motion rehearing, if any, and responsive pleadings thereto,

if any;

6. Petition for Discretionary Review!

7. Briefs filed in connection with Petition for Discretionary Review;

and

8. Opinions or orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals issued

Response to the Petition for Discretionary Review.

l'OSTOll-ICIr: BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TkK AS 78711-2548 TI-1.: (5 12) 463-21 00 WWW.OAG.STATK.TX.US

An llqtfd!limpUymetlt Oppnihtiiily limploya- • I'lluteri on Re<y:/eri I'uper
Christopher Prine, Clerk

1st Court of Appeals

Page Two

These records are needed and therefore you may send them to my attention at

the address listed below. If you should have any questions, feel free to call

(512)463-3321.

Thank you for your kind assistance in this matter.

NELDA T. GARCIA

Administrative Assistant IV

Office of the Attorney General

Criminal Appeals Division

William P. Clements Bldg. - 8th Floor

300 W. 15th Street

Austin, Texas 78701
POST OHI'ICE BOX (2548

AUSTIN TEXAS- 78711-2548

Return Services Requested

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTf FOR PRIVATE USE

JESSE RQDRIGUEZ

1ST COURT OF APPEALS

301 FANNIN STREET

HOUSTON TX 77002 2066:

neoposfi* 

S^^l

i

>TM.t_5 X- ~5 MiVl«1i»*»li*'»"MiMn\i'"i""-iiMin»p1»
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of NetIQ Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Charles M. Boesenberg, Chief Executive Office and James A. Barth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles M. Boesenberg                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|September 10, 2004                                            



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James A. Barth                                                            
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer
|September 10, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                           10.02
                                  September 25, 1997



Vladimir Kelman

Hand-delivered


Dear Vladi,

In the event your employment is terminated without cause, Racotek will provide
you with six (6) months advance notice of your termination, or otherwise provide
you with compensation equivalent to six (6) months of pay at your
then-prevailing salary.  Please sign below to indicate your receipt and
acknowledgement of this letter.

Very truly yours,


Mike Fabiaschi

Mike Fabiaschi
President & C.E.O.


ACCEPTED THIS 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997:

                                                 Vladimir Kelman
                                                 -----------------
                                                 Vladimir Kelman







                                          15
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6237

BRENT EDWARD CLARK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , District Judge. ( 3:20

- cv - 00223

- GMG )

Submitted : July 27, 2022 Decided: August 24, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Brent Edward Clark, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6237 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Brent Edward Clark appeals the district court’s o rder adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Clark’s complaint under the Federal
Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and affirm. See Rich v. United States , 811 F.3d 140, 144 (4th Cir. 2015) (stating that a distric t court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is reviewed de novo ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6237 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Trevar Tyrece LINDO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 59 

To prohibit the sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum 

Reserve to certain entities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mrs. BICE (for herself, Mr. WALTZ, Mr. POSEY, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. BAIRD, 

Mr. ALLEN, and Mr. VALADAO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the sale of petroleum products from the Strategic 

Petroleum Reserve to certain entities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save America’s Valu5 able Energy Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST SELLING SPR PETROLEUM 

7 PRODUCTS TO CERTAIN ENTITIES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Energy Policy and Con9 servation Act is amended by inserting after section 169 

10 (42 U.S.C. 6247b) the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 59 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 170. PROHIBITION ON SALES TO CERTAIN ENTITIES. 

2 ‘‘The Secretary shall prohibit the sale of petroleum 

3 products drawn down from the Strategic Petroleum Re4 serve, under any provision of law, to any entity 

5 headquartered in— 

6 ‘‘(1) a country listed in table 1 to paragraph 

7 (d)(1) under section 126.1 of title 22, Code of Fed8 eral Regulations, as in effect on the date of enact9 ment of this section; or 

10 ‘‘(2) Russia.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

12 (1) DRAWDOWN AND SALE OF PETROLEUM

13 PRODUCTS.—Section 161(a) of the Energy Policy 

14 and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6241(a)) is 

15 amended by inserting ‘‘and section 170’’ before the 

16 period at the end. 

17 (2) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of con18 tents for the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 

19 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec20 tion 169 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 170. Prohibition on sales to certain entities.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit








AMENDMENT
TO
INTEGER HOLDINGS CORPORATION 2016 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
INTEGER HOLDINGS CORPORATION 2011 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
INTEGER HOLDINGS CORPORATION 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Integer Holdings Corporation 2016 Stock Incentive Plan, the Integer Holdings Corporation 2011 Stock Incentive Plan and the Integer Holdings Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (individually a “Plan” and collectively, the “Plans”) is made effective as of December 13, 2018 by action of the Board of Directors of Integer Holdings Corporation.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, on recommendation of the Compensation and Organization Committee, has determined that this Amendment is in the best interests of participants in the Plans and the Company;
THEREFORE, the Plans are amended as follows:
1.Section 4 of each Plan is amended to provide that the Committee may by resolution delegate, subject to any limitations imposed by applicable law, to an officer of the Company the authority to designate the persons who shall be granted Incentive Awards under such Plan and the amount, type and other features of each such Incentive Award.  The Committee by resolution from time to time may also establish such other limitations and conditions on such delegated authority as the Committee deems appropriate and may revoke any such delegation of authority at any time.
2.    Effective with respect to Incentive Awards granted under the Plans after December 3, 2018, Section 18 of each Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
18.    Withholding Taxes
The Company shall have the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy the Company’s federal, state, local, foreign, or other withholding obligations required by law to be withheld with respect to any exercise, vesting, or other taxable event arising under the Plan.  The Company shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct the amount of any such withholding obligations from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the Participant.  Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at the time the Incentive Award is granted or thereafter, the Company may satisfy any such withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by withholding from the Incentive Award Company Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date of withholding equal to the amount that the Company determines is necessary to satisfy its withholding obligation.  The Committee may also permit withholding to be satisfied by the transfer to the Company of unencumbered shares of Company Stock theretofore owned by the Participant.
3.    All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment but defined in the Plans shall have the meanings given them therein.
4.    Except to the extent amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plans and any Award Agreement remain in full force and effect.
Bobbie FOREHAND, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
-->

**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of INCA Designs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on October 23, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Stacy Josloff, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Stacy
      Josloff


Stacy
      Josloff


Chief
      Executive Officer


October
      23, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.