alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6188 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6188

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the 
              ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 2, 2023

  Mr. Fry (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
    Duncan, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Mace, and Mr. Timmons) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                             Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, as the 
              ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NANCY YOUNT CHILDS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 420 Highway 17 North in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Nancy Yount Childs Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Nancy 
Yount Childs Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Melvin D. WILLIAMS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-3693

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6073 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 6073 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER DAVID FITZGERALD 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Phila5 delphia, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

12 David Fitzgerald Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
STATE of Louisiana v. Ardulrauman ZEITOUN

NO. 2017-K-2034

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1190 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 72 ) ll-E- 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 8

Printed 5/5/20089:13:51 AM

Sheet 72 of 106P. 2 

## \

## j&'S, 

# USB. \ , •*tpfVLf«> 

# V UNITE D STATES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y WASHINGTON , D.C . 2

_

MEMORANDU

M TO : FROM : SUBJECT : Th eFil e OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RADIATIO N

Leil a Holme s Cook , Attorney/Advisor/J^ / Manufacturer s Operation s Divisio n tf** Telephon e cal l wit hGenera l Motor s regardin g technologica l feasibilit yconcern s presente d b y California' s OB D I I DATE : Marc h15 , 199 3 Th e followin g i s a summar yo f th e telephon e cal l betwee n EP A (And yBrooks , Kar l Simo n an d Le e Cook ) an d Genera l Motor s (Sa m Leonard , Stev e Mahan , Mar k Hester , Dav e Ferris ) an d o nMarc h11 , 199 3 t o lear n o f Genera l Motors ' concern s regardin g th e technologica l feasibilit yo f California' s OB D I I regulations . GMha s a t leas t tw o technologica l feasibilit yissue s o f whic hi t wante d t o mak e EP Aaware . Th e firs t ha s t o d o wit h catalys t monitorin g (LEV s '96 ) an d th e secon d wit hmisfir e monitorin g ('97) . Catalys t monitorin g Thi s i s a nissu e fo r '9 6 becaus e LE V standard s requir e war mu p catalyst s (underfloo r n o longe r adequate) . GMi s usin g underfloo r fo r TLEVs . Design s fo r '9 6 mus t b e i nplac e thi s summer . Discussio n o f SA E 93103 4 Oxyge n storag e capacit yi s th e onl yknow nmetho d o f evaluatin g catalys t efficiency . Ther e i s however , n o know ncaus e an d effec t relationship . Ther e i s no t consisten t correlatio n betwee noxyge nstorag e capacit yan d catalys t efficiency . Th e wors t correlatio noccur s i nth e cas e o f warmu p converters . An d th e pollutan t wit hth e wors t correlatio ni s HC . G Mwant s t o monito r a s a system . The ycan' t d o s o unde r CAR B regulation s becaus e can' t demonstrat e tha t a malfunctio n wil l b e indicate d whe nth e fron t catalys t i s alon e Recycled/Recyclabl e Prime d wit h Soy/Canol aIn k o n pape rthat contain s atleas t50 %recycle d fibe rP. 3



### - 2 - malfunctioning . G Msa ythi s woul d lead t o fals e MIL s becaus e a s a systemcatalys t efficiencyi s stil l likel yt o b e adequate . Manufacturer s prefe r EPAemission s incremen t methodologyan d se e i t a s the onl ypossibl e solutio nrigh t now . Engine Misfir e I f CARB woul d relaxrequiremen t slightl yt o exclud e are a i nlowe r righ t han

d corne r the res t i s feasible . The operatio n i nthi s are a i s minimal(0.1%) .
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 29 (Friday, February 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 8015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03001]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 14, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments 
can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0d4c7d7d61646e6c796462637e234e6260606863797e4d6c7961236b7f6f23627f6a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d4c7d7d61646e6c796462637e234e6260606863797e4d6c7961236b7f6f23627f6a">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Community Bancshares of Mississippi, Inc. Employee Stock 
Ownership Plan, Brandon, Mississippi; to acquire additional voting 
shares, for a total of 19.27 percent of the voting shares of Community 
Bancshares of Mississippi, Inc., Brandon, Mississippi, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Community Bank of Mississippi, 
Forest, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 8, 
2022.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-03001 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases, Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID, Clinical Trial 
Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required) 
and NIAID Clinical Trial Planning Grants (R34 Clinical Trial Not 
Allowed).
    Date: March 4, 2022.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Anuja Mathew, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G58, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-761-6911, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43222d3629226d2e22372b2634032d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="22434c5748430c4f43564a4755624c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

     Dated: February 3, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02661 Filed 2-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED L ADAE SAMAEL LANAERD FRANKLIN , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 213 LT Case No. 16

- 2020

- CF

- 1962

- AXXX STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed Jun e 6, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , Mark B orello , Judge. J essica J

. Yeary , P ublic D efender, and B arbara J. B usharis, A ssistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, an d Robert C harles Lee, A ssistant Attorney G eneral, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. HARRIS , KILBANE and MACIVER , JJ. , concur

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50365

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARRELL MONTEZ BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-99-CR-56-1

--------------------

February 13, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Darrell Montez Brown (Brown) appeals his conviction for

possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a). Brown challenges the district court's denial of

his motion to suppress. He argues the search of his vehicle was

unconstitutional because, inter alia, the trooper testified he

was not positive the odor he smelled was marijuana and because no

marijuana was found in the vehicle. 

As noted in United States v. Reed, 882 F.2d 147, 149 (5th

Cir. 1989), the distinct odor of burnt marijuana, by itself, will
No. 00-50365

-2-

provide probable cause to search a vehicle. Moreover, the

detection of the odor of marijuana justifies a search of the

entire vehicle, including locked compartments where contraband is

likely to be concealed. Id. 

As in Reed, "the resolution of this issue simply boil[s]

down to a credibility choice," and because the trooper repeatedly

testified that he believed the odor he smelled was marijuana, the

district court did not err in denying Brown's motion to suppress. 

Reed, 882 F.2d at 149.

Neither is it relevant that the trooper did not ultimately

find marijuana in the vehicle. "It is not controlling that the

substance eventually discovered in the vehicle was cocaine, and

that no marihuana was ever found." Id. "It is settled that the

presence or absence of probable cause to search is not determined

by what the search does or does not ultimately reveal." Id.

Brown's conviction is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Allen J. Bernstein, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Morton’s Restaurant Group, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date:  May 17, 2005

 
|   | /s/ ALLEN J. BERNSTEIN  |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Allen J. Bernstein      |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
#### Antonio MOULTRIE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph MCFADDEN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6408

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 19, 2017

Decided: September 26, 2017

Antonio Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, Alphonso .Simon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Moultrie seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the *249denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moultrie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Qavontae Machell LANG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D16-2930

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 2018

Rocco J. Carbone, III, St. Augustine, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Qavontae MacHell Lang, contends in part that we should reverse his convictions based on ineffective assistance of counsel that is apparent on the face of the record. Except in rare cases, allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel must be raised in a postconviction proceeding brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, not on direct appeal. *See* *Barnett v. State* , 181 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). We reject Appellant's argument that this case meets that rare standard. While Appellant also raises what he characterizes as a double jeopardy argument, he challenges his two fifteen-year sentences, not his convictions. *See* *State v. Williams* , 854 So.2d 215, 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (noting that a double jeopardy claim "constitutes, in reality, a challenge to [the appellee's] convictions rather [than] his sentence"). Because Appellant did not preserve this argument, we cannot address it. *See* *535*Sims v. State* , 998 So.2d 494, 504 (Fla. 2008) ("In Florida, a specific, contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve a sentencing error."). Our disposition does not preclude Appellant from challenging his sentences in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). *See* *Eason v. State* , 932 So.2d 465, 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (noting that the appellant, who completed youthful offender boot camp, argued in his rule 3.800(a) motion that the trial court erred in sentencing him following his violation of probation). Finally, we have considered Appellant's remaining arguments, which we find to be meritless.

AFFIRMED .

LEWIS , KELSEY , and WINSOR , JJ., concur.
Minerva Marie MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Margo SHERIDAN, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 24, 2018]

Minerva Marie Mendez, Royal Palm Beach, pro se.

Richard A. Sherman, Sr., and James W. Sherman of Law Offices of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Julio L. Diaz, Jr., of Law Offices of Christina M. Sanabria, Plantation, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed.*

Gerber, C.J., Gross and Conner, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Vitalstate, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Heather Baker,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that;

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Heather Baker
---------------------------
Name:  Heather Baker
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 29, 2004