alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 164A/29.

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 164A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 5729. května 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 164A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 5729. května 2014

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Evropská centrální banka |
| 2014/C 164A/01 | Prodloužení lhůty pro podávání přihlášek pro zájemce o jmenování do funkce člena správní revizní komise | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská centrální banka

2014/C 164A/01

Prodloužení lhůty pro podávání přihlášek pro zájemce o jmenování do funkce člena správní revizní komise

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 164A/02 | Přehled výběrových řízení zveřejněných v řadě C A úředního věstníku | 2 |

2014/C 164A/02

Přehled výběrových řízení zveřejněných v řadě C A úředního věstníku

2

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská centrální banka

| 29.5.2014 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 164/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 164/1

---

Prodloužení lhůty pro podávání přihlášek pro zájemce o jmenování do funkce člena správní revizní komise

2014/C 164 A/01

ECB oznamuje, že lhůta pro podávání přihlášek na základě výzvy externím odborníkům k vyjádření zájmu o jmenování do funkce člena nebo náhradníka správní revizní komise Evropské centrální banky (Frankfurt nad Mohanem, Německo) zveřejněné v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie dne 1. května 2014 (1) se prodlužuje do dne 2. června 2014.

Frankfurt nad Mohanem, 23. května 2014.

---

(1)  Úř. věst. C 133 A, 1.5.2014, s. 1

---

29.5.2014

| 29.5.2014 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 164/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 164/2

---

PŘEHLED VÝBĚROVÝCH ŘÍZENÍ ZVEŘEJNĚNÝCH V ŘADĚ C A ÚŘEDNÍHO VĚSTNÍKU

2014/C 164 A/02

Níže najdete seznam Úředních věstníků řady C A publikovaných v tomto roce.

Pokud není uvedeno jinak, jsou Úřední věstníky publikovány ve všech jazykových verzích.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Frederick National 
Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be held virtually and is open to the public. 
Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need special 
assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the meeting, 
should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH 
Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: Frederick National Laboratory Advisory 
Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    Date: February 24, 2022.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Ongoing and new activities at the Frederick National 
Laboratory for Cancer Research.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Wlodek Lopaczynski, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant 
Director, Office of the Director, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 
Medical Center Drive, Seventh Floor, West Tower, Room 7W514, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 276-6458, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#69050619080a1e290408000547070001470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462a2936272531062b272f2a68282f2e68212930">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: FNLAC: https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/fac/fac.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2022.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02367 Filed 2-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra Energy & Resource Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Dan Brecher, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Dan Brecher |
|-----------------|

Dan Brecher

Principal Financial Officer

Date:  April 14, 2008
David GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Lonnie L. WARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0409

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
jcap_Ex10_27



		

			Exhibit 10.27

		





		
			AMENDMENT TO TERM LOAN AGREEMENT
		

		
			This Amendment to  Term Loan Agreement (“Amendment”) is made as of the 17th day of August, 2018, by and among STORAGE BUILDERS II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Borrower”), and FIRSTBANK, a Tennessee state bank, whose address is 6815 Poplar Avenue, Suite 100, Memphis, Tennessee 38138 (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”). 
		

		
			WHEREAS, the parties entered into a certain Term Loan Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2018, with respect to a Loan from Bank to Borrower in the amount of Nine Million One Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($9,150,000.00) (the “Loan Agreement”); and
		

		
			WHEREAS, Section 8.1(g) of the Loan Agreement contained a capitalized term, "Key Bank Line," which had not been defined in the Loan Agreement.
		

		
			NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises, the parties hereto agree as follows:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section 8.1(g) of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 




		
			(g)A default under the Credit Agreement, as it may be amended from time to time, that results in an acceleration of the outstanding obligations of the Guarantor, as borrower under the Credit Agreement, as the Credit Agreement may be amended from time to time.
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			As modified hereby, the Loan Agreement is ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.




		
			[Signature page follows]
		

		
			


		 


 


[Signature Page to Amendment to Term Loan Agreement]
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Bank have executed this Amendment, or have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above written.
		

		
			BORROWER:
		

		
			 
		

		
			STORAGE BUILDERS II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: JERNIGAN CAPITAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its sole member and managing member
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: JERNIGAN CAPITAL, INC., a Maryland corporation, its managing member
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ Kelly Luttrell
		

		
			Name: Kelly Luttrell
		

		
			Title: SVP CFO
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			BANK:
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRSTBANK, a Tennessee state bank
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By: /s/ Bill Harter
		

		
			Name: Bill Harter
		

		
			Title: Senior Vice President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Lee STOWERS, a/k/a Benji Stowers, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Travis Lee Jones, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chad David Robinson, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee Bennett, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-6661, No. 16-6667, No. 16-6708, No. 16-6782

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 2017

Decided: July 20, 2017

Larry W. Shelton, Federal Public Defender, Christine Madeleine Lee, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. John P. Fishwick, Jr., United States Attorney, Jean B. Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Char-lottesvillé, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Benjamin Lee Stowers, Travis Lee Jones, Chad David Robinson, and Robert Lee Bennett appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions to reduce sentence. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons *209stated by the district court. *United States v. Jones,*No. 7:11-cr-00039-GEC-RSB-6 (W.D. Va. May 11, 2016); *United States v.*Robinson, No. 7:12-cr~00015-GEC-3 (W.D. Va. May 10, 2016); *United States v. Bennett,*No. 7:09-cr-00045-GEC-1 (W.D. Va. May 10, 2016); *United States v. Stowers,*No. 7:11-cr-00053-GEC-1 (W.D. Va. May 9, 2016). We deny as moot the pending motion to place this case in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Michael HAGAN, DOC #18547, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3524

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1301 

To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the 

Comptroller General of the United States to submit to Congress reports 

regarding White supremacy in the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2021 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Defense and the Comptroller General of the United States 

to submit to Congress reports regarding White supremacy in the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORTS ON WHITE SUPREMACY IN THE 

4 ARMED FORCES. 

5 (a) INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF

6 DEFENSE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the De8 partment of Defense shall submit to Congress a report 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1301 IH

1 containing a list of all steps the Inspector General is tak2 ing to combat White supremacy in the Armed Forces. 

3 (b) COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED

4 STATES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the 

5 enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the 

6 United States shall submit to Congress a report regarding 

7 the prevalence of White supremacy in the Armed Forces. 

8 Such report shall include the recommendations of the 

9 Comptroller General, if any, regarding legislation to com10 bat White supremacy in the Armed Forces. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of INCA Designs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 2) for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2008 (the Report), I, Stacy Josloff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Stacy Josloff      
|Stacy Josloff          
|Chief Executive Officer
|September 23, 2008     

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Appleby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



April 29, 2005                              /s/  Robert Appleby
                                            -----------------------
                                            Robert Appleby
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ruvan Ricardo LAKEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-56

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### Jose Canales et al., Respondents, v Finley Middle School, Huntington Union Free School District No. 3, Respondent-Appellant, Huntington Coach Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[770 NYS2d 746]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Huntington Coach Corporation and Claude DeFay appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered January 9, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the defendant Finley Middle School, Huntington Union Free School District No. 3, cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, on the law, the motion of the defendants Huntington Coach Corporation and Claude DeFay, and the motion of the defendant Finley Middle School, Huntington Union Free School District No. 3, are granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants-respondents and the respondent-appellant, all cross claims insofar as asserted against the respondent-appellant are dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants-respondents and the respondent-appellant.

Finley Middle School, Huntington Union Free School District No. 3 (hereinafter the school district), established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrat*516ing that the sudden and unforeseen act which caused the infant plaintiffs injuries could not have been prevented by any reasonable degree of supervision. In response, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Velez v Freeport Union Free School Dist.,*292 AD2d 595 [2002]; *Nossoughi v Ramapo Cent. School Dist.,*287 AD2d 444 [2001]; *Janukajtis v Fallon,*284 AD2d 428, 430 [2001]; *Convey v City of Rye School Dist.,*271 AD2d 154, 160 [2000]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the school district’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it *(see Francisquini v New York City Bd. of Educ.,*305 AD2d 455 [2003]; *Morman v Ossining Union Free School Dist.,*297 AD2d 788 [2002]).

Moreover, the Supreme Court should have granted the motion of the bus company, the defendant Huntington Coach Corporation, and the bus driver, the defendant Claude DeFay, since in response to their demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to submit sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether their alleged negligence was a proximate cause of the infant plaintiffs injuries *(see Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp.,*51 NY2d 308 [1980]; *Nocilla v Middle Country Cent. School Dist.,*302 AD2d 573 [2003]; *Thomas v United States Soccer Fedn.,*236 AD2d 600 [1997]). Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 5, 2006 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.


          August 14, 2006          /s/ Stephen E. Pomeroy
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Stephen E. Pomeroy
                                   Chief Executive Officer and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISIAH PAUL MENDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:18-cr-00185-WO-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: March 22, 2022

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Todd A. Smith, SMITH GILES PLLC, Graham, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Stephen T. Inman, Assistant 

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Isiah Paul Mendez pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced Mendez under the Armed 

Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to 188 months’ imprisonment. On 

appeal, Mendez challenges his classification as an armed career criminal, arguing that his 

prior North Carolina breaking or entering convictions did not qualify as violent felonies

because North Carolina’s breaking or entering statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-54(a), is 

broader than a generic burglary statute.

As we recently explained, this argument is foreclosed by our decision in United 

States v. Mungro, 754 F.3d 267, 272 (4th Cir. 2014). See United States v. Dodge, 963 F.3d 

379, 382-84 (4th Cir. 2020) (reaffirming that “§ 14-54(a), as interpreted by the North 

Carolina Supreme Court, sweeps no more broadly than the generic elements of burglary

and therefore a conviction under that statute qualifies as an ACCA predicate conviction”

(internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1445 (2021). Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s judgment.

∗

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Although we placed this appeal in abeyance for United States v. Gary, 954 F.3d 

194 (4th Cir. 2020), rev’d, Greer v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2090 (2021), it is clear after 

the decision in Greer that Mendez’s conviction does not run afoul of Rehaif v. United 

States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019).