alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1001

VARTKES GARABED, a/k/a Vartkes Garabed Nazarian,

Petitioner,

versus

BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration & Naturalization Service. (A31-318-677)

Submitted: May 31, 1996 Decided: July 26, 1996

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vartkes Garabed, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Peter Lindemann, Sr.,

Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Jennifer Helene Zawid, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Given this disposition, we deny Nazarian's motion for a stay

of deportation pending our resolution of his appeal. We therefore

deny the INS's motion to clarify its opposition to Nazarian's

motion as moot.

2

PER CURIAM:

Vartkes Garabed, a/k/a Vartkes Garabed Nazarian, appeals from

the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision denying him relief from

deportation under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

We have reviewed the BIA's decision adopting the immigration

judge's reasoning and denying relief and discern no abuse of discretion or other error meriting reversal. See Gandarillas-Zambrana

v. Board of Immigration Appeals, 44 F.3d 1251, 1259 (4th Cir.)

(providing standard), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 3203,

3239 (U.S. Oct. 2, 1995) (No. 94-1720). Accordingly, we affirm.* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6139 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6139

  To direct the Postal Service to establish a post office at 73 West 
      Stewart Road in Lathrop, California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2023

  Mr. Duarte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
               Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Postal Service to establish a post office at 73 West 
      Stewart Road in Lathrop, California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISH POST OFFICE AT 73 WEST STEWART ROAD IN LATHROP, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Postal Service, using the authority under 
section 401 of title 39, United States Code, shall seek to establish a 
post office at 73 West Steward Road in Lathrop, California, not later 
than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Good Faith Negotiations.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Postal Service shall seek to enter into good faith negotiations with 
all owners of the location described in such subsection to acquire or 
lease such location for the purpose of establishing a post office at 
such location.
    (c) Borrowing Limit Exception.--To the extent necessary to 
establish a post office at the location described in subsection (a) 
pursuant to this Act, obligations issued for the costs of establishing 
such post office shall be disregarded with respect to limitations under 
section 2005(a).
                                 <all>
```
Melvin COX, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Veronia B. MORGAN, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2368

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 30, 2017

Upon the Court's own motion, it is ordered that this appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Florida is dismissed for failure to comply with this Court's orders dated November 9, 2017, and with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and LUCK, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 09/09-0467]


The Central Valley Fund II (SBIC) L.P.; Surrender of License of 
Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 09/09-0467 issued to The 
Central Valley Fund II (SBIC), L.P., said license is hereby declared 
null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-02833 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Barry CARRELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1848

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 2, 2018

Nicole DiPrima of The DiPrima Law Firm, LLC, Coral Springs, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED .

Osterhaus, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.
#### IN RE: CELGARD, LLC, Appellant

2016-1218

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 13, 2016

Cyrus Alcorn Morton, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by Andrew Douglas Hedden, William Manske; Bryan J. Vogel, New York, NY.

Frances Lynch, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley, Thomas W. Krause,. William Lamarca, Scott Weidenfeller.

(Prost, Chief Judge, Lourie and Moore, Circuit Judges).

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 31, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1861

Lower Tribunal No. 20-16088

________________

Ricardo Grubb and Denise Grubb,

Appellants,

vs.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. 

Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Gray R. Proctor (Madison, NJ), for appellants.

Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., and Jessica C. Conner 

(Orlando), for appellee. 

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Demetrio GABRIELE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1970

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.02

October 18, 2000
Jeff McCall
2100 Welch #C120
Houston, Texas 77019

Dear
Jeff,

On
behalf of Zamba, I am both extremely pleased and excited to offer you an opportunity to join us as Executive Vice President of Internal Operations, reporting to the President and
Chief Executive Officer.

We
would like to offer you an exempt, full time position, which includes:



This
offer is contingent upon your executing the attached employment agreement before commencing your employment, the successful completion of your reference and background
investigation, and compliance with the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Also, if you are not a U.S. citizen, U.S. permanent resident, nor been granted asylee or refugee status, this
offer is contingent upon your ability to meet Zamba's Immigration policy guidelines and INS approval of your right to reside and work in the United States (i.e., approval of appropriate work visa or
status for Zamba, Minneapolis). Should you qualify, Zamba will pay the reasonable and usual costs to obtain the appropriate nonimmigrant classification.

This
offer will remain valid for seven days from the date of this letter unless we notify you otherwise. You should understand that this offer does not constitute a contract of
employment for any specified period of time but will create an "employment at will" relationship.

Please
sign this letter, indicating acceptance of this offer and your anticipated start date. Return the signed copy in the enclosed envelope and keep a copy for your records. Please
review and complete the enclosed forms. Bring these forms and the appropriate I-9 documentation with you on your first day of work. At orientation we will cover your benefits, review your
forms and answer any questions you may have.

---

Jeff, we believe that you will find Zamba a truly exciting and fulfilling place to work. We look forward to your joining us and contributing to our success.

Sincerely,

/s/
Paul Edelhertz

Paul
Edelhertz
Chairman of the Board of Directors

I
accept this offer:

|                |  |         
|--------------- |  | --------
|/s/ Jeff McCall |  | 10/18/00
|NAME            |  | Date    

Anticipated
Start Date: 11/1/00

ENCL:



---
Re:	Petition	for	Amendment	to	Add	Aircraft	to	Exemption	No.	#	12315	Issued	to AirFrame	LLC	(Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA

- 2015

- 1710

Dear	Sir	or	Madam:

AirFrame	LLC	was	granted	exemption	(Exemption	No.	12315,	Docket	No.	FAA

- 2015

- 1710)	to	use	UAS	for	aerial da ta	collection	using	the	DJI	S80 0	and	Tarot	680Pro. AirFrame	LLC	requests	for	an	amendment	to	that	exemption	to	add	the Iris	+	and X8+ and X8

- M, all products	of	3DRobotics .		AirFrame	LLC	agrees	to	operate	these aircraft	under	the	same	restrict ions	in	the	exemption.

These aircraft	have	been	previously	granted	in	other	exemptions	a nd	would	not	set any	precedent.		A ll	proposed	aircraft	are	of smaller	size	and	weight	as	the	DJI	S800 and	would	utilize	the	identical	flight	and	ground	sta tion	components	used	in	the original	exemption.

Sincerely,

Nathan	Richards
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

 August 14, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Supporting Documents for 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) 

Standards - Copyrighted Website References to support the Solar Panel Credit Discussed in 

Chapter 5 of the Technical Support Document for the Final Rule 

FROM: Arvon L. Mitcham, Program Manager/Engineer 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo covers documents for a website reference contained in Chapter 5 of the Technical 

Support Document (TSD) for the 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards 

Final Rule. The following web address for the reference is listed below: 

• http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20090519/170318/. 

 

Due to the copyrighted nature of this material, we are not including this material in the docket. 

However, the web address above may be used to access this material.
Exhibit








	
			
	
	 
	Exhibit 10.28-01

	P.O. Box 982
	 

	El Paso, Texas
	 

	79960-0982
	 

	(915) 543-5711
	 








Emmanuel Villalobos
Senior Forward Marketer, Long-Term Trading
El Paso Electric Company


November 12, 2018


Mr. Johnny Key
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services
333 North Central Avenue Suite 21.021
Phoenix, AZ   85004


Re:  Power Purchase and Sale Agreement between Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC And El Paso Electric Company


Dear Mr. Key,


Pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Power Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Agreement”) between Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC (“FMES”) (formerly, Phelps Dodge Energy Services, LLC) and El Paso Electric Company (“EPE”), as memorialized by letter agreement dated March 23, 2015 among FMES, EPE and Samchully Power & Utilities 1, LLC, FMES and EPE (collectively the “Parties”) hereby agree to maintain the quantity for energy to be purchased and sold under Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Agreement at 125 MW per hour through 11:59 p.m. Mountain Standard Time on December 31, 2021.  This is in accordance with our recent phone conversations, and subsequent acceptance of FMES’ offer for an additional 25 MW for the period of three (3) years.  The parties further agree that the quantity of firm energy that may be dispatched by EPE pursuant to Section 3.6 of the Agreement is 125 MW per hour, less the quantity of energy sold and delivered by FMES pursuant to Section 3.1.  The amount of energy to be purchased and sold under the Agreement was set to revert to the original base contract amount of 100 MW per hour, on 11:59 p.m. Mountain Standard Time on December 31, 2018, based on an October 24, 2016 agreement between the Parties.


Please indicate FMES’ acknowledgement of the foregoing agreement by signing this letter in the place indicated below and returning the original or a copy thereof to my attention at your earliest convenience.


Sincerely,


	
	
	/S/ Emmanuel Villalobos






Emmanuel Villalobos


















Page 1 of 2






	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 











[AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES]


El Paso Electric Company


	
	
	/S/ David Hawkins






VP System Operations Resource Planning & Management










Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC


	
	
	/S/ Mark Hanson






President, Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Energy Services, LLC 
































Cc:     D.H. Kim
Samchully Power & Utilities 1, LLC










































Page 2 of 2
STATE of Louisiana v. Damion WILLIAMS

No. 2017-K-1753

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE**

PER CURIAM:

Granted in part. Defendant was found guilty as charged of armed robbery with a firearm, La. R.S. 14:64 and 14:64.3, second degree kidnapping, La. R.S. 14:44.1, and attempted second degree murder, La. R.S. 14:27 and 14:30.1. He was adjudicated as a third-felony offender, and his armed robbery sentence was enhanced under the Habitual Offender law. La. R.S. 15:529.1. Defendant's appeal was pending when the Legislature amended the Habitual Offender law with 2017 La. Acts 282. The amendment substantially reduced the sentencing range for a third-felony offender like defendant and further provided, "This Act shall become effective November 1, 2017, and shall have prospective application only to offenders whose convictions became final on or after November 1, 2017." Defendant seeks to be resentenced under the amendment, and the State concedes defendant is entitled to be resentenced in accordance with it because his conviction will become final after November 1, 2017. Accordingly, we grant defendant's application in part to vacate his enhanced recidivist sentence for armed robbery, and we remand for resentencing for this offense in accordance with 2017 La. Acts 282. The application is otherwise denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1443 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1443

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of 
      small business loan data related to LGBTQ-owned businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2021

 Mr. Torres of New York (for himself, Mr. Auchincloss, Mr. Blumenauer, 
 Ms. Bonamici, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Clarke of New 
 York, Ms. DelBene, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Espaillat, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Mr. 
Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Hastings, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. Johnson 
of Georgia, Mr. Jones, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Leger Fernandez, Mr. Lowenthal, 
    Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Moore of 
 Wisconsin, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Norton, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Payne, Mr. Raskin, 
Ms. Scanlon, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Strickland, Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Watson 
Coleman, Ms. Titus, Mr. Meeks, and Mr. Tonko) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the collection of 
      small business loan data related to LGBTQ-owned businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``LGBTQ Business Equal Credit 
Enforcement and Investment Act''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION.

    Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691c-
2) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``LGBTQ-owned,'' after ``minority-owned,'' 
        each place such term appears;
            (2) in subsection (e)(2)(G), by inserting ``(including 
        sexual orientation and gender identity),'' after ``sex''; and
            (3) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) LGBTQ-owned business.--The term `LGBTQ-owned 
        business' means a business--
                    ``(A) more than 50 percent of the ownership or 
                control of which is held by 1 or more individuals self-
                identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or 
                queer; and
                    ``(B) more than 50 percent of the net profit or 
                loss of which accrues to 1 or more individuals self-
                identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or 
                queer.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6057 

To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan 

of Action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mrs. MCCLAIN (for herself, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. NORMAN, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. BIGGS, 

Mr. YAKYM, Mr. OWENS, and Mr. TIMMONS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint 

Comprehensive Plan of Action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iran Nuclear 

5 Verification Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 6057 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES FROM REJOINING 

2 THE JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF AC3 TION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the United States may not become a party 

6 to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or to any other 

7 agreement with Iran relating to the nuclear program of 

8 Iran until the President certifies to Congress that nuclear 

9 inspectors of the United Nations— 

10 (1) are allowed full access to all of Iran’s nu11 clear facilities; and 

12 (2) have completed their comprehensive report 

13 relating to Iran’s nuclear facilities. 

14 (b) JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION DE15 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘Joint Comprehensive 

16 Plan of Action’’ means the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 

17 Action signed at Vienna on July 14, 2015, by Iran and 

18 by France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the People’s 

19 Republic of China, the United Kingdom, and the United 

20 States, and all implementing materials and agreements re21 lated to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Dennis Merrill DEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5548

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
The NELSEN RESIDENCE, INC., Appellant, v. The CITY OF CAPE CORAL, Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2833

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 18, 2018.

Alan F. Hamisch of The Hamisch Law Firm, PLLC, Naples, for Appellant.

Steven D. Griffin, Cape Coral, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
### EXHIBIT 99.2



### Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rick L. Hurt, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.

Date: May 22,
2007/s/ Rick L.
HurtRick L.
HurtTreasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Charles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.'s Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.





Date: September 10, 2010





/s/ Charles DeisbeckCharles Deisbeck, Chief Executive Officer






E-3
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00097-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.W. AND B.D., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 78,887

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Chelsea Mosley, appellant, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss her appeal. Pursuant to 

Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

We dismiss this appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: October 16, 2013

Date Decided: October 17, 2013
Bobby L. MAGWOOD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Julie JONES, Secretary, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1269

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

This petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

BLACK, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
ALL SEASONS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D15-2418, 3D15-2284

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Doris E. MCNULTY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BANKUNITED, FSB, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D 17-1176

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 25, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.