alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 2, 2011

Mr. Ron Frederick Chief Systems Engineer Commercial Derivative Projects

United States Air Force

645 AESG 2530 Loop Road West Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7106

Dear Mr. Frederick:

This is in response to your May 6, 2011 letter (public docket No. FAA-2011-0495) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of the United States Air Force (USAF) for an exemption from §§ 45.25 and 45.29 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow the USAF to operate military aircraft with registration marks that are smaller than those required by the regulations while the aircraft are operating outside the United States.

Based on the information provided in your letter, your aircraft operation outside the United States appears to meet the definition of a state aircraft within the meaning of the Chicago Convention. If that is the case, you may mark your aircraft as you deem necessary. We recommend an aircraft logbook entry to document the marking change and when changing back to 12-inch registration marks.

Since an exemption is not necessary we will close the docket and take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dorenda D. Baker Director, Aircraft Certification Service
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(i)  
 
Amendment to Wells Fargo & Company Supplemental 401(k) Plan


The Wells Fargo & Company Supplemental 401(k) Plan (the “Supplemental 401(k) Plan”) is amended as follows: 


		
	1.
	Section 16(d)(2) of the Supplemental 401(k) Plan is amended in its entirety effective December 31, 2018 to read in full as follows:




(N)     Key Employee.  If the Participant is determined to be a “Key Employee” for purposes of Code section 409A, no lump sum or installment payment shall be paid to the Participant prior to the date that is six months after the date the Participant’s Separation from Service occurred.  For purposes of this Plan, a Participant’s status as a Key Employee shall be determined in accordance with the Wells Fargo & Company Key/Specified Employee Policy as adopted and amended from time to time by the Human Resources Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.    


		
	2.
	Except as herein expressly amended, all the terms and provisions of the Supplemental 401(k) Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
Exhibit 23


          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports included in this
Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements: (1) Registration Statement File No. 33-40472 on
Form S-8 of the 1986 Stock Option Plan, the 1985 Stock
Incentive Plan, the 1985 Key Employee Incentive Stock Option
Plan and the Individual Written Compensation Plan dated
May 10, 1991, (2) Registration Statement File No. 33-44864
on Form S-8 of the 1986 Restated and Amended Stock Option
Plan and Directors' Stock Option Plan dated January 8, 1992,
(3) Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the 1992 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan dated June 16, 1992, (4) Registration
Statement File No. 33-86548 on Form S-3 dated November 21,
1994, (5) Registration Statement File No. 33-65463 on
Form S-3 dated December 28, 1995, as amended on February 9,
1996, (6) Registration Statement File No. 333-28565 on
Form S-8 of the 1997 Non-Officer Employee Stock Option Plan
dated June 5, 1997, as amended on October 29, 1997, and
(7) Registration Statement File No. 333-62523 on Form S-8 of
the 1997 Equity Participation Plan dated August 31, 1998.


                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Portland, Oregon,
  June 21, 1999
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 24



                              POWER OF ATTORNEY


        We, the undersigned directors of Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the 
"Company") hereby appoint E. Thomas Arington and Timothy J. Holt or either of
them, with full power of substitution, our true and lawful attorneys and
agents, to do any and all acts and things in our names and on our behalf as
directors of the Company which is said attorneys and agents, or either of them,
may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the
securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations or
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with the
filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996 including, without limitation, signing for us, or any of us,
in our names as directors of the Company, such Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto, and we hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorney and
agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, this Power of Attorney has
been signed below by the following persons in the capacities indicated as of
the 27th day of March, 1997.



/s/ E. Thomas Arington                 Chairman of the Board
------------------------------
E. Thomas Arington


/s/ George W. Baughman                 Director
------------------------------
George W. Baughman


/s/ Derek G. Layton                    Director
------------------------------
Derek G. Layton


/s/ Stanley L. Morgan                  Director
------------------------------
Stanley L. Morgan


/s/ S. Sundararaman                    Director
------------------------------
S. Sundararaman
# (l FORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY 

### AIRPORT AUTHORITY

..... FORT WAYNE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ." SMITH FIELD AIRPORT

March 15,2010 The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE

.... Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: Onbehalfofthe Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Authority
- owner and operator ofFortWayne International Airport (FWA) in Fort Wayne, Indiana, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDeltaAir Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. With five (5) daily nonstop flights between FWA and Detroit Metro Airport, ourbusinesses couldbenefit from convenient connections toTokyo's Haneda airport, and we feel our community would bein a strong position to build greater relationships between ourbusinesses and Japanese businesses ifthis service was granted. Ourbusiness travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearlybenefit ourbusiness travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request. Sincerely,

Torrance A. Richardson, A.A.E. Executive Director ofAirports Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport Authority

A Whole New Altitude 3801 W. Ferguson Rd., Ste. 209 • Fort Wayne, IN 46809-3194 • Ph: 260-747-4146 • Fax: 260-747-1762 • Web: www.fwairport.com
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40629 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-56-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Daniel Pena has

requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Pena has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1513 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1513

To require that all Special Drawing Rights allocations be authorized by 
                            Congress in law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2021

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that all Special Drawing Rights allocations be authorized by 
                            Congress in law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Drawing Rights Oversight 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ALL ALLOCATIONS OF SPECIAL 
              DRAWING RIGHTS.

    Section 6(a) of the Special Drawing Rights Act (22 U.S.C. 286q(a)) 
is amended by striking ``so that allocations'' and all that follows and 
inserting a period.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Sunshine Act notice; notice of public meeting (roundtable) 
agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public Roundtable: U.S. Election Assistance Commission 
Language Access Roundtable.

DATES: Thursday, February 17, 2022, 1:00 p.m.-3:00 p.m. Eastern.

ADDRESSES:  Virtual via Zoom.
    The meeting is open to the public and will be livestreamed on the 
U.S. Election Assistance Commission YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpN6i0g2rlF4ITWhwvBwwZw.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2898f97968a8b85a2878381cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f54524a4b5756587f5a5e5c11585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose: In accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act 
(Sunshine Act), Public Law 94-409, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552b), the U.S. 
Election Assistance Commission (EAC) will conduct a virtual meeting to 
discuss topics and resources available to election officials as they 
serve language minority voters.
    Agenda: Commissioners will hold a public meeting (roundtable) to 
moderate panel discussions on the following topics: (1) The importance 
of accurate, legal, and culturally competent translation for limited-
English proficiency voters and best practices for implementing new 
language programs, including serving voters with disabilities, (2) How 
jurisdictions have implemented effective language assistance plans to 
better serve voters in their communities, (3) Highlighting innovative 
and practical ways jurisdictions have addressed languages challenges, 
and (4) Design elements, budget impacts and helpful tips to stretch 
funds for the greatest results.
    Background: New Section 203 determinations were made in December 
2021. The EAC will host a virtual roundtable to highlight a spectrum of 
issues that state and local election officials will need to consider 
when adopting new language requirements or recently losing section 
language requirements. Commissioners and attendees will hear from 
expert panelists who will share resources and best practices related to 
serving language minority groups.
    The full agenda will be posted in advance on the EAC website: 
https://www.eac.gov/events/2022/02/17/language-access-roundtable.
    Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Kevin Rayburn,
General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-02705 Filed 2-4-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         506,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  915,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                291,068,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             333,643,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     57,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       209,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,096,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               333,643,000
<SALES>                                     52,457,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,703,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,865,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   706,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,159,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,159,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
SERVED : OCTOBE R20 , 201 1 U.S
. DEPARTMEN r

OFTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I N THE MATTERO F BRIA N WALLAES A F A A DOCKE T NO
. CP1OWPOO1 0 (Civi l Penally Action ) FDMSNO
. FAA-2010-062 8 

### ihPARTMEN TO F iANSPORTATiO N " :Xi\E TOPERATION S 'm \ OC T2 5 A ^ : 3

ORDE RO E TH E CHIE E ADMINISTRATIV E LA WJUDG E FOLLOWIN GPREHEARIN GCONFERENC E A t th e Oetobe r

18 , 2011 , prehearin g telephon e conference , th e partie s were directe dto discus s sctdin g thi s cas e andto infor mth e Judge , b

y Novembe r

1 , 2011 , whethe r

th e cas e i s settling
. I f th e partie s cannot.settle — (1 ) B y Novembe r

15,201 1 — (a ) Complainan t

shal l provid e th e Judg e acop y o f th e recordo f

th e criminal proceedin g agains t

Responden t

arisin g fro

mth e sam e inciden t

a s thi s matter ; and (b ) Complainan t

shal l provid e th e Judg e andth e Respondent , abrief , detailin g ho w th e propose dcivi l penalty wa s calculate dan dsettin g fort han y relevan t precedent s fo

r th e propose dpenalty
. (2 ) B y Novembe r

22 , 2011 , Responden t

shal l provid e to th e Judg e andComplainan t an y repl y brief

. S O ORDERED
.
Ronni e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La

w >(idge Attachmen t

- Servic e l.js tF A A Docke t

No
. CP l OWPO

O 1 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building-Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Bria n Wallaesa , Respondcn l 1127 2 Wortha mCres t

Circl e Manassas , V A 2010 9 TEL : 570-778-133 5 Joh n C
. Stuart , Jr. , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Chie f

Counse l Enforcemen t

Division , AGC-30 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-995 8 FAX : 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A
. Yoder , Chie j Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r service.i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.

_ 9
_
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glacier Water Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian H. McInerney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                  
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.

|/s/ BRIAN H. MCINERNEY                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                          | 
|Brian H. McInerney President and Chief Executive Officer November 8, 2002 |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Brion Umidi, the Chief Financial Officer of ReGen Biologics,
Inc. (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004 (the
Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Brion UmidiName: Brion UmidiTitle: Chief Financial Officer
#### William E. MOSLEY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 73-106

501 S.W. 2d 225

Opinion delivered November 19, 1973

No brief for appellant.

*Jim Guy Tucker,*Atty. Gen., by: *O. H. Hargraves,*Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

J. Fred Jones, Justice.

William E. Mosley was convicted of the crime of voluntary manslaughter in connection with the death of Garland Little and was sentenced to seven years in the penitentiary. Mosley has designated the entire record on appeal to this court but has filed no abstract and brief.

The Attorney General has filed a brief in support of *537the state’s motion to affirm for want of error appearing on the face of the record, and has filed an abstract of the record in accordance with rule 11 (f) of this court. We have examined the entire record and find no error that would call for a reversal in this case.

The homicide in this case grew out of a free-for-all brawl in a combination bar and pool hall in which the appellant Mosley and several other people were involved. It appears that the brawl started wnen a barmaid tripped over a wire behind the bar and her boyfriend, who was present, thought another one of the patrons had pushed her. The record discloses that practically all of the patrons got into the act of fighting each other with fists, bar stools and pool cues.

Donald Thacker testified that he was not involved in the fight but was present and observed all of it from behind the bar. He said people were swinging pool sticks and bar stools and that he saw Garland Little on the floor getting beat up. He said that Little was crippled and as he got up from a bar stool where he was sitting, he pulled Mosley’s hair. He said Jimmy Burris struck Little in the side with a bar stool and knocked him down. He said that Mosley then seemed to go berserk and started beating Little on the chest and head with a pool cue. He said Little remained on the floor while Mosley stood over him and beat him with the pool cue. He said he observed Lloyd Lonberger trying to get Mosley to stop beating Little, and that the fight was all over when Mosley did finally stop beating Little with the pool cue. He said he did not see Little get to his feet again after the beating. He said that one of Little’s eyes was hanging out of its socket; that his other eye was badly swollen and he was unable to talk when the ambulance came for him. Little died in a hospital from subdural hematoma approximately ten days following the beating.

We are of the opinion that there was ample evidence to go to the jury in this case and that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and the judgment rendered thereon. Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.