alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The BISYS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the six months ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          47,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,132
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               118,492
<PP&E>                                          52,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,633
<BONDS>                                          1,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           501
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,015
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,192
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   907
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,081
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63<F1>
<FN>
<F1>We have calculated earnings per share amounts in accordance with FAS 128
"Earnings Per Share". We have entered basic and diluted amounts in place of
primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7845-7846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02777]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Kidney Precision 
Medicine Program (KPMP) Review.
    Date: March 16-17, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7015, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

[[Page 7846]]

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02777 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                  Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
----                                                  ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
ICI Holdings, LLC                                                      Delaware
Insight Communications Company, L.P.                                   Delaware
Insight Midwest, L.P.                                                  Delaware
Insight Capital, Inc.                                                  Delaware
Insight Communications Midwest, LLC (f/k/a Insight Communications
         of  Indiana, LLC                                              Delaware
Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC                                          Delaware
Insight Communications of Kentucky, L.P.                               Delaware
Insight Kentucky Partners I, L.P.                                      Delaware
Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P.                                     Delaware
Insight Kentucky Capital, LLC                                          Delaware
Insight Holdings of Ohio, LLC                                          Delaware
Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC                            Delaware
Insight Interactive, LLC                                               Delaware
SourceSuite LLC                                                        Delaware
</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2000

_____________________________

VICTORIA FATER,

Petitioner,

v.

KYLE FATER,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Amended Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

July 19, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Michael R. Yokan, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.
2

Corrine A. Bylund of Bylund Law, PLLC, Jacksonville Beach, for 

Respondent.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas E. Mara, as Chief Executive Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the“Company”) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 3, 2004
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1443 

AN ACT 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require the 

collection of small business loan data related to LGBTQowned businesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1443 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LGBTQ Business 

3 Equal Credit Enforcement and Investment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION. 

5 Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act 

6 (15 U.S.C. 1691c–2) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘LGBTQ-owned,’’ after ‘‘mi8 nority-owned,’’ each place such term appears; 

9 (2) in subsection (e)(2)(G), by inserting ‘‘, sex10 ual orientation, gender identity’’ after ‘‘sex’’; and 

11 (3) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘(7) LGBTQ-OWNED BUSINESS.—The term 

14 ‘LGBTQ-owned business’ means a business— 

15 ‘‘(A) more than 50 percent of the owner16 ship or control of which is held by 1 or more 

17 individuals self-identifying as lesbian, gay, bi18 sexual, transgender, or queer; and 

19 ‘‘(B) more than 50 percent of the net prof20 it or loss of which accrues to 1 or more individ21 uals self-identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, 

22 transgender, or queer.’’. 

23 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

24 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

25 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

26 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 
3 

•HR 1443 EH

1 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

2 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

3 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro4 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

5 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 24, 2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1443 

AN ACT 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to rerelated to LGBTQ-owned businesses. quire the collection of small business loan data
The ESTATE OF Louise F. CLEPEA, A. John Clepea, Husband and Personal Representative, Appellant, v. Thomas SAMUEL, M.D., and Cassann Blake, M.D., Appellees.

No. 4D17-3219

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 10, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
Rena AMRO, Appellant, v. Ronald GAZZE, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3610

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2018]

Jonathan Mann and Robin Bresky of Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Cynthia L. Greene and Sonja A. Jean of Law Offices of Greene Smith Jean, P.A., Coral Gables, and Elisha D. Roy of Law Offices of Elisha D. Roy, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Conner, J.

The appellant ("Former Wife") appeals final orders entered after the appellee ("Former Husband") moved to enforce the final judgment dissolving their marriage and approving a marital settlement agreement between the parties. Former Wife raises four issues on appeal, contending the trial court erred by (1) awarding Former Husband costs with no basis identified for the award or explanation of the costs awarded; (2) awarding Former Husband six months of rent; (3) failing to articulate sufficient facts to award monetary damages to Former Husband for repairs to the former marital residence; and (4) awarding attorney's fees to Former Husband without identifying the basis for the award and articulating a reasonable hourly rate and a reasonable amount of time expended. We affirm the trial court without discussion on the first three issues. We reverse and remand as to the issue pertaining to the attorney's fee award.

We are satisfied, based on our review of the record, that the trial court awarded attorney's fees pursuant to the provisions of the marital settlement agreement, which provided that a defaulting party was liable for attorney's fees. However, where a trial court fails to articulate the required findings as to a reasonable hourly rate or a reasonable number of hours expended, the award should be reversed and remanded with directions for the trial court to determine and articulate the required findings. *See**Trainor v. Trainor* , 199 So.3d 523, 524 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ; *Hay v. Hay* , 944 So.2d 1043, 1048 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Because the trial court failed to make factual findings regarding the reasonable hourly rate or the reasonable number of hours expended for the attorney's fees awarded, we reverse the award and remand the case for the trial court to make the appropriate findings and determination as to the amount of attorney's fees to award Former Husband. If needed, the trial court is permitted to conduct further proceedings as to the amount of fees, but not entitlement.

*Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.*

Levine and Forst, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio A. DIAZ-ALVAYERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4800

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 21, 2017

Decided: September 21, 2017

James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Shari Silver Derrow, Staff Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Ro-senstein, United States Attorney, Brian M. Fish, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julio A. Diaz-AIvayero, a native and citizen of Guatemala, appeals the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully reentering the United States following his removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2012). Diaz-AIvayero argues on appeal that the district court both committed procedural sentencing error and imposed a substantively unreasonable *225sentence, but does not contest the validity of his underlying conviction.

Review of the Bureau of Prison’s Inmate Locator Database reveals that Diaz-Al-vayero was released from federal custody on or about April 25, 2017, after briefing was completed in this appeal. Thus, Diaz-Alvayero’s challenge to his sentence is moot, upon his completion of the custodial term of imprisonment, unless he can demonstrate “collateral consequences sufficient to meet Article Ill’s case-or-controversy requirement.” *United States v. Hardy,*545 F.3d 280, 284 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted); *see Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 7-8, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); *see also Hardy,*545 F.3d at 283-85.

No such collateral consequences are apparent. Diaz-Alvayero has completed service of the custodial term of imprisonment he seeks to challenge in this appeal, and he is not under an order of supervised release. Nor does Diaz-Alvayero assert on appeal any arguments that, if successful, would invalidate his underlying conviction. *Cf. United States v. Madrigal-Valadez,*561 F.3d 370, 373-74 (4th Cir. 2009) (holding that appeal challenging sufficiency of the evidence underlying alien’s convictions was not mooted by alien’s release from prison, without' a term of supervision, because alien “may be subject to collateral consequences” related to his ability to receive permission to reenter the United States if his conviction remained intact). Accordingly, we dismiss Diaz-Alvayero’s appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument will not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Matthew BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5607

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 16, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.16

LOGO

September 6, 2006

VIA HAND DELIVERY

Mr. Charles Zwebner

Chief Executive Officer

Yak Communications Inc.

300 Consilium Place, Suite 500

Toronto, Ontario, Canada



| | Re: | Yak Communications Inc. (the Company)
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

Dear Charles,

It is my understanding that the Company and you have reached an understanding whereby you
have agreed to waive your rights and claims to and not to seek any compensation from the Company under the Change of Control provisions of your Employment Agreement with the Company dated as of January 1, 2004 (the Employment
Agreement) as set forth in Sections 5 and 11 thereof (Section 5 of the Employment Agreement addresses the employment termination provisions; Section 11  provides definitions for various terms used in Section 5 and elsewhere in
the Employment Agreement). The purpose of this letter agreement is to confirm the foregoing understanding.

In consideration of the mutual
benefits to be derived from this letter agreement, ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, you hereby irrevocably agree (i) to waive your rights and claims to and not
to seek any compensation from the Company under the Change of Control provisions as set forth Sections 5 and 11 of the Employment Agreement and (ii) to release the Company from any present or future obligations to pay such compensation pursuant
the same provisions of the Employment Agreement. All other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

If you are in accord with the terms of this letter agreement, please sign where indicated below and return a signed copy to the undersigned.

Agreed and Acknowledged by:



|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Charles Zwebner                       
|    |  | Charles Zwebner in his individual capacity

The terms of this letter agreement have been accepted and agreed to as of the date first above written.

Accepted and Agreed to this 8th day of September 2006.

Yak Communications Inc.



|       |  |                                                            
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Gary M. Clifford                                       
|Name:  |  | Gary M. Clifford                                           
|Title: |  | Chairman of Independent Committee of the Board of Directors

Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. 300 Consilium Place Suite 500 Toronto ON Canada M1H 3G2 T: 416.296.7111 F:
416.279.1437 www.yak.ca.
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**Rentrak Corporation**

**Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors**

Each non-employee director of Rentrak Corporation (“Rentrak”) receives an annual retainer of $30,000. In addition, the chairof the Compensation Committee receives a $3,000 annual retainer, the chair of the Audit Committee receives a $5,000 annual retainer, and each other non-employee director who serves on the Audit Committee receives a $2,500 annual retainer.Non-employee directors are also paid $1,200 for each board or committee meeting they attend in person or by telephone conference call. Rentrak also reimburses directors for their travel expenses for each meeting attended in person. 

In accordance with the provisions of Rentrak’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan approved by the shareholders at the 2005 annual meeting, the Board ofDirectors has approved the award of 9,000 deferred stock units (“DSUs”) to each non-employee director each year beginning in 2006. The DSUs represent the right to receive an equal number of shares of Rentrak’s Common Stock pursuant tothe terms and conditions of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan on a deferred basis in compliance with the terms of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The DSU awards granted in 2006 and 2007 vested on the one-year anniversary ofthe grant date, while DSUs granted in 2008 and 2009 vest in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant date, in each case so long as the recipient continues to be a non-employee director on the vesting date. The DSUs alsovest in full upon termination of the recipient’s service on the Board due to death or disability or a change in control of Rentrak. Vested DSU awards become payable following the recipient’s ceasing to be a director of Rentrak.
Experts to Weigh in On Port Authority Reforms- Metropolis- WSJ 

TifE WALL STREET JOUIL'lAL. 

April17, 2014. 2:10 F'fVl F:T 

Experts to Weigh in On Port Authority Reforms 

By Andrew Tange/ and Ted Mann 

Pedestrians walk past the Port Authority Bus Terminal in New York on 

Wednesday. 

Bloomberg News 

Page I of2 

For months, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has been mired in controversy over the 

apparently politically motivated closure of lanes leading to the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, 

N.J. 

Some have called for cleaving apart the agency, which is controlled by the two states and operates major 

airports, bridges and bus terminals in the region. There have been questions over patronage and conflicts 

of interest amid investigations by legislators and prosecutors. 

Now the experts will weigh in on how to fix the Port Authority. The agency on Thursday named five 

experts who will discuss reforms next week. The panelists include: 

lV1itcheU IVIoss, prot~~..,;:::.or of urban poJiey and planning and director of the Rudin CcnterforTnul::>portation at 

Ne,.vYork University. 

Robert Y.aro} president of the Regional Plan Association. 

1\'Iartin Robins, founding director of the Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center at Rutgers Universi-ty and 

former (lj rector of planning at the Port .Authmity. 

Carol Kdlcrrnann, president of the Citizens Budget Commission . 

• Jameson Doig. Princeton Universi-ty professor emeritus am! author of the- hook, "Emp.ire on the I-Iudson.'' 

The expert panel will meet at 9 a.m. Monday at the Port Authority's headquarters in Manhattan. 

http:/ /blogs. wsj .com/metropolis/20 14/04/17 /experts-to-weigh-in-on-port -authority-reforms/!... 9/5/2014 
Experts to Weigh in On Port Authority Reforms- Metropolis- WSJ Page 2 of2 

Scott Rechler, the Port Authority's vice chairman who chairs the Special Oversight Committee formed in 

the wake of the bridge scandal, said the committee hopes to get "actionable advice" on reforms and 

suggestions for longer-term changes. 

"When it comes to reform at the Port Authority, everything is on the table," Mr. Rechler said in a 

statement. 

Copyright 2014 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved 

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by 

copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies. please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit 

www.djreprints_com 

http:/ /blogs. wsj .com/metropolis/20 14/04/17 /experts-to-weigh-in-on-port-authority-reforms/!... 9/5/20 14
AFS-14-242-E 

September, 12 2014 

 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0242 

Mr. James Peters 

Merrill Aviation & Defense 

1023 South Wheeler Street 

Saginaw, MI 48602 

Dear Mr. Peters: 

This is in response to your April 8, 2014, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2014-

0242) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration behalf of Merrill Aviation & Defense 

(Merrill Aviation) for an exemption from §§ 91.9(b) and 91.203(a) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Merrill Aviation to 

operate an unmanned aircraft (UA) that does not carry and display that aircraft’s 

airworthiness, certification, and registration documents required in part 91. 

We have reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 91.9(b) and 

91.203(a). Based on our review and consideration of FAA Memorandum subject 

“Interpretation regarding whether certain required documents may be kept at an unmanned 

aircraft’s control station”, (copy enclosed) dated August 8, 2014, we find this relief not 

necessary. Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2014-0242 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

William E. Crozier 

Assistant Manager, UAS Integration Office 

Enclosure