alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7894

WILLIAM SATTERFIELD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GILMORE HICKS; APRIL GREEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Satterfield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2018) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018).*

 We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Satterfield v. Hicks, No. 3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 

2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Satterfield’s claims without prejudice, we 

have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 

2020).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6003 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the inclusion of medical 

debt on a consumer report, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 19, 2023 

Ms. PORTER (for herself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. NORTON, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. TONKO, Mr. 

MULLIN, Mr. NEGUSE, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. CHU, Ms. MENG, Ms. CASTOR

of Florida, Mrs. FOUSHEE, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. SPANBERGER, Ms. OMAR, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. POCAN, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. LEE of California) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the 

inclusion of medical debt on a consumer report, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Debt Relief 

5 Act of 2023’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6003 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT. 

2 (a) MEDICAL DEBT DEFINED.—Section 603 of the 

3 Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681a) is amended 

4 by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(bb) MEDICAL DEBT.—The term ‘medical debt’ 

6 means a debt related to, in whole or in part, transactions, 

7 accounts, or balances arising from the receipt of medical 

8 services, products, or devices.’’. 

9 (b) EXCLUSION FOR MEDICAL DEBT.—Section 

10 605(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 

11 1681c(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(9) Any adverse information related to a medical 

13 debt, including a medical debt that was placed for collec14 tion, charged to profit or loss, or subjected to any similar 

15 action.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF REGULATIONS RELATING TO 

17 PROHIBITIONS ON USE OF MEDICAL DEBT IN18 FORMATION. 

19 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘cred20 it’’ and ‘‘creditor’’ have the meanings given those terms 

21 in section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 

22 U.S.C. 1691a). 

23 (b) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the 

24 date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Bureau 

25 of Consumer Financial Protection shall amend section 

26 1022.30 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, or any 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6003 IH

1 successor regulation, to ensure that creditors are prohib2 ited from obtaining or using information relating to the 

3 medical debt of a consumer in determining whether or not 

4 to extend credit to that consumer. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Carlos Oscar FUENTES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3302

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 28, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        The undersigned, Brion D. Umidi, the Chief Financial Officer of Aros
Corporation (the "Company"), has executed this certification in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the
"Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.



        Date:  August 14, 2002                /s/ Brion D. Umidi
              ----------------                ----------------------------
                                              Name:  Brion D. Umidi
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer
NUMBER 13-20-00194-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF S.F.O., A.S.O., A.M.O., A.A.O.,

AND A.S.O., CHILDREN

On Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File a Brief

ORDER 

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. The brief of the 

appellant, A.O., was due to be filed on May 4, 2020. Appellant has filed a motion for 

extension of time seeking twenty days of additional time to file the brief.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals, but include additional expedited 

deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 
2

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that 

these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of 

appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). 

Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion for extension of time and ORDER 

appellant’s brief to be filed on or before May 26, 2020. No further extensions of time will 

be granted absent truly exigent and extraordinary circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of May, 2020.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ J. DONALD BOGGUS, JR.            
|J. Donald Boggus, Jr.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 15, 2004
# -



# - d'"-\v1 D 

# -~ AN"" - /I.? 

## I

~ 

# '7/30fr6 

# ;r.,~

~ 

# ~'6/03/,,, ;::-.: II"" (4910-1



## • 

# • RIN 212Q-AA64 Federal AviatioD Administration

! 

### AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration <fAA), Department of 

### Transportation 

## i 

## O>O~. I



# . ACIlON: Fmal mIe; request for comments. 

# I SUMM.AR.Y: Weare.adopting a new 

### aUwo4ess directive (AD) for the products Ii I above. This AD results from mimdafory 

### CODtinpmg airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) 

### ';";.o'ed b .. _.... f th 

# i I .'-tify d· 

## ._-> o.~ yan ."ration 4WUOmyO 

### ano cr untryto'tucu an oorrectan WU>G.Le condition on an aviation product. The MOO d 

# 1bes the unsafe condition as: Several inservi~ events related to van

# J eleCtrical systems, have led to the discovery of a'connnon 'root cause: l~lika:gefailure mode of Transient .. Voltage Suppressor (TVS) diodes used 

## dPower 

### Distribution Control Units (pDctJ) cards or GeneratOr 

# COD$.lIUirit (GCU) cards in the Primary Power Distribution Boxes -(pP. B). Due to ouch TVS diode failure m.ode. operation of some eloctri 

### lcircuits is de~~ ~ some control S1gna1sare seht-tmex.pected 1 lS•.Fl1!f;ber analysIS mdicated that combination of alVS diode fail~ wi6ther systems failmes could 

### significantlyreduce flightsafety. 

# I
•• * • !* ! 

# i 1 

# i DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORIATION 

# I i ! 

# , 14CFRPart 39 

# OlQOO 

# I [Docket No. FAA.201O-uu

### -*; Dirtttorate Ibtifier 2016-NM-162-AD;



# . \c"

LJ

# 10. l'b-O:l. . Ame.ndment39.u

## ..l ; AD 1010-"·-) 

# 'i



# I Airworthiness Directives;.Das~ult-Aviation ~odel FALCON 7X Airplanes

nus AD requires actions lha1:are intended to dress the unsafe condition described in theMCAI. FAA Form 1360014,.1 (&089) OfFlCWrfllE Y .lJ.t,JlPO:l-.o-TM-01VZ(l'C11
Mark P. HAYE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Stephanie M. WELDON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 10.3**

TERMINATION OF THE FINOVA GROUP BONUS AND UNITED KINGDOM 

SEVERANCE TRUST AGREEMENT 

WHEREAS, Finova Group, Inc. (the “Grantor”) established the FINOVA Group Bonus and United Kingdom Severance Trust Agreement (the “Trust“) effective November 1, 2003; and 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Exhibit D of the Trust, the undersigned is an authorized signatory onbehalf of the Grantor; and 

WHEREAS, the terms of the Trust provide that to the extent that the Grantor has satisfied all Bonus Obligationsand UK Severance Obligations, the Grantor shall be entitled to receive all Trust Assets remaining in the Trust, upon the presentation to the Trustee of a final Affidavit of the Grantor stating that all Beneficiaries’ claims to Bonus Obligationsand/or UK Severance Obligations, as applicable have been satisfied or eliminated; and 

WHEREAS, the Grantor has determined to cause anyremaining Bonus Obligations and/or Severance Obligations to be satisfied by causing any remaining beneficiaries who remain employed by Grantor to receive payment of such amounts in advance of such beneficiaries future termination date, provided thatsuch amounts be paid following January 1, 2008; and 

WHEREAS, the Company has been advised by counsel that the above described actionswill be permissible under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), provided the Company causes any Bonus Obligations and UK Severance Obligations to be following January 1, 2008; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Grantor shall cause all remaining employees eligible to receive any Bonus Obligations and UK SeveranceObligations on January 15, 2008; and 

RESOLVED, that the Grantor shall take all actions necessary to cause the Trust to be terminatedon the earliest date following payment of all Beneficiaries thereunder; 

RESOLVED, that the proper personnel, as appropriate, be, andhereby are, authorized to cause to be executed as may be required under the Trust such certificates, powers of attorney, affidavits, agreements, assignments, documents, releases, and instruments as are required in connection with the termination ofthe Trust and the receipt by the Grantor of any reversionary interest in accordance with Section 10 of the Trust. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executedthis written consent as of this 12th day of November, 2007. 

 
THE FINOVA GROUP, INC.By: /s/ Thomas E. MaraTitle: Chief Executive Officer
 

2
Erickson OCCEUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3505

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 13, 2018

Erickson Occeus, Monticello, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00744

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.C., P.C., JR., AND A.C.,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01143

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Paul Castillo's First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to January 4, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1471 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to include an exception for disaster 

area member business loans made by insured credit unions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2021 

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself and Mr. FITZPATRICK) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to include an exception for disaster area member business loans made by 

insured credit unions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Credit for 

5 Small Businesses Impacted by the COVID–19 Crisis Act 

6 of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1471 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR DISASTER AREA MEMBER BUSI2 NESS LOANS MADE BY INSURED CREDIT 

3 UNIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 107A(c)(1)(B) of the 

5 Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)(1)(B)) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

8 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period and in9 serting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(vi) made by an insured credit union 

12 that has received a composite rating of ei13 ther 1 or 2 under the Uniform Financial 

14 Institutions Rating System or an equiva15 lent rating under a comparable rating sys16 tem, the proceeds of which will be used to 

17 aid in the recovery from the COVID–19 

18 pandemic, if— 

19 ‘‘(I) the extension of credit is 

20 being made during the period begin21 ning on the date of enactment of this 

22 clause and ending 1 year after the 

23 termination date of the emergency de24 clared by the President on March 13, 

25 2020, under section 501 of the Robert 

26 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and EmerVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:36 Apr 14, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1471.IH H1471

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1471 IH

1 gency Assistance Act relating to the 

2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID– 

3 19 pandemic); and 

4 ‘‘(II) the extension of credit does 

5 not threaten the safety and soundness 

6 of the insured credit union.’’. 

7 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than the end of the 30- 

8 day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

9 Act, the National Credit Union Administration Board 

10 shall issue an interim final rule to define— 

11 (1) when an extension of credit aids in the re12 covery from the COVID–19 pandemic for purposes 

13 of section 107A(c)(1)(B)(vi) of the Federal Credit 

14 Union Act (as added by paragraph (1)); and 

15 (2) when such extension of credit does not 

16 threaten the safety and soundness of the applicable 

17 insured credit union. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Jamie  B.  Coulter,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of Lone  Star
Steakhouse & Saloon, Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby
certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 25, 2003 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Jamie B. Coulter
                                           --------------------------
                                           Jamie B. Coulter
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           May 8, 2003
```
Elizabeth Denby MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Michael J. MULLAUGH and Bank of New York Mellon, as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Peggy A. Denby, Deceased, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Matthew Pridgen, Also Known as Matthew Shepard, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 541]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J), rendered October 25, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41⁄2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The police officer’s observation of defendant walking in a drug-prone neighborhood with a companion who was openly sniffing a bag of marijuana, provided the officer with a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot and justified a common-law inquiry of defendant as to whether he had any contraband. Defendant was not merely in proximity to unlawful activity, but was clearly accompanying a person who was engaged in such activity *(see People v Curry,*213 AD2d 664 [1995], *lv denied*85 NY2d 971 [1995]; *compare People v Leveridge,*204 AD2d 246 [1994], *394
      *lv denied*84 NY2d 828 [1994]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### Jay Junior AIKEN Plaintiff-Appellant v. Chip L. HALL, Sheriff, Jackson County; Linda, RN; Charlie, Officer; John Bucanon, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6454

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Jay Junior Aiken, Appellant Pro Se.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Junior Aiken seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 21, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on March 22, 2017. Because Aiken failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny Aiken’s motion to appoint counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
                 Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                               Quarter Ended
                                                 April  5,
                                              ----------------
                                               2001     2002
                                              -------  -------
<S>                                           <C>      <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    12,576   12,698
                                              =======  =======

Net income                                    $ 2,926  $ 4,663
                                              =======  =======

Net income per common share                   $  0.23  $  0.37
                                              =======  =======

DILUTED
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                    12,576   12,698

Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding
during the period                                 141       91

                                              -------  -------
Total common and common equivalent
shares                                         12,717   12,789
                                              =======  =======

Net income                                    $ 2,926  $ 4,663
                                              =======  =======

Net income per common share                   $  0.23  $  0.36
                                              =======  =======
</TABLE>


<PAGE>