alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEf\lED 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. HEARING DOCKET -----------------------------------------------------------

In the Matter of Mountain Air Cargo, Inc., Docket No. FAA-2014-0111, Case 

No. 2013EA680043 

AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ONE-WEEK EXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY 

TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE 

TO MOTION FOR DECISION 

The Agency, by counsel, hereby requests a one-week extension, to October 7, 

2014, to file a reply to Respondent's Supplemental Memorandum in response to 

the Agency's Motion for Decision. The basis for this motion is as follows: 

(1) Under the Order Granting Joint Request for Extension of Deadline, 

dated September 3, 2014, the Agency was granted an extension until 

September 30, 2014 to file the subject submission. 

(2) The previous Joint Request for Extension of deadline was based on the 

parties' anticipation that they would enter into settlement discussions in 

mid-September. At this point, the parties are beyond merely just 

anticipating settlement discussions-they are currently engaged in settled 

discussions and have made significant progress in that respect, but some 

more time is needed. It is anticipated that if the parties do settle, it will 

be at some time before October 7, 2014. Thus, the request for an 

extension for the Agency to file the subject submission. Counsel for 
Respondent has indicated by e-mail that he bas no objection to this 

request. 

WHEREFORE, the Agency requests a one-week extension, until 

October 7, 2014, to file a reply to Respondent's Supplemental 

Memorandum in response to the Motion for Decision. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

By' Za<h~ '1;(~\(!'f Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

718 553-3258 

718 995-5699 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ONE-WEEK 

EXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL 

MEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DECISION 

has been sent via first class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: 

Mark A. Dombroff 

Respondent's Counsel 

McKenna Long & Alderidge 

1676 International Drive PH 

Mclean, VA 22102 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

Ron. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I hereby certify that the foregoing AGENCY'S REQUEST FOR ONE-WEEK 

EXTENSTION TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL 

MEMORAMDUM IN RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DECISION 

has been sent via first class mail addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-43~0 ~~ 

Date: SEP 2 9 2014 ________:_./J ~.A­ Li Hooks 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

3
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Salon Media Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Elizabeth Hambrecht, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ Elizabeth Hambrecht
                                           -------------------------------------
         June 27, 2005                     Elizabeth Hambrecht
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1
                                                                  ------------




INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc.
Mount Vernon,  New York

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-29037 and No. 333-29029 of Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. on Form S-8 and in
Registration Statement No. 333-74629 of Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. on Form
S-3 of our report dated April 9, 1999 [April 14, 1999 as to note 18], appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc. for the
year ended January 29, 2000.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey
April 19, 2000
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This certificate is              Engage, Inc.                    CUSIP 292827102
transferable in                  Incorporated under the
Boston, MA or                    laws of the State of
New York, NY                     Delaware
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



     ENGAGE, INC. transferable on the books of the Company by the holder hereof
in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares represented
hereby are issued under and shall be held subject to the laws of the State of
Delaware and the provisions of this Second Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and the Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, as amended
from time to time, to which the holder by acceptance hereof assents. This
Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer
Agent and Registrar.

     WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures
of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

-----------------------                                -------------------------
Chief Financial Officer   [Seal of Corporation Here]         President and
and Treasurer                                               Chief Executive
                                                                Officer



                                  ENGAGE, INC.


     The Corporation is authorized to issue more than one class of stock. Upon
written request, made by the holder of this Certificate, the Corporation will
furnish to such holder without charge a copy of the full text of the
preferences, voting powers, qualifications and special and relative rights of
the shares of each class authorized to be issued, as set forth in the Second
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended from time to time.

     For value received, __________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto _________________ shares of the common stock represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ______________
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company
with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated: __________________


_____________________________________________________________________
     Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as
written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration
or enlargement or any change whatever.


     Signature(s)


     Guaranteed: The signature(s) should be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor
institution (banks, stockbrokers, savings and loan associations and credit
unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion program),
pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.
#### Anthony DOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul L. JONES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-6473

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se.

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Dove appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have *181reviewed the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Dove v. Jones,*No. 5:16-ct-03183-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
# Virginia Beach Sailor Dies of COVID-Related Complications

### 30 Apr 2021

More Details            Information Warfare Training Command Virginia Beach Command Logo                        160831-N-XX082-001                            Information Warfare Training Command Virginia Beach Command Logo            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: MC2 Derien LuceVIRIN: 160831-N-XX082-001

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. – Senior Chief Fire Controlman (AEGIS) Michael Wilson, age 45, of Suffolk, Va., temporarily assigned as student support management staff to Information Warfare Training Command Virginia Beach, Virginia died at Riverside Regional Medical Center on Thursday, April 29 due to COVID-related complications.The Sailor tested positive for COVID-19 on April 25 and was admitted to Riverside Regional Medical Center in Newport News.  Sailors who were in contact with the Sailor have been notified and are taking the appropriate precautions.We mourn the loss of our shipmate; our thoughts and prayers are with the Sailor's family, friends and coworkers during this difficult time. 

## Contact
IN RE: Marcus Paul LACOMBE

NO. 2018-B-0716

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

Respondent pleaded no contest to a felony charge of domestic abuse aggravated assault and a misdemeanor charge of domestic abuse battery. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Marcus Paul LaCombe, Louisiana Bar Roll number 28647, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years, retroactive to July 6, 2017, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

JOHNSON, C.J., would reject the petition for consent discipline.

CLARK, J., would reject the petition for consent discipline.

CRICHTON, J., would reject the petition for consent discipline and assigns reasons.

CRICHTON, J., would reject the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline and assigns reasons:

In light of Respondent's conviction of a serious felony crime of violence, I would reject the Joint Petition for Consent Discipline as too lenient.
Cory Devon ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1498

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 26, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Brice TROGDON, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4248

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Rhymer, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 879]

*316Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), rendered August 1, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s state law claim that he was improperly sentenced is unpreserved since he neither requested a hearing regarding his termination from the drug treatment program nor moved to withdraw his plea (see *People v Battle,*287 AD2d 361 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 751 [2002]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court correctly concluded that defendant had violated the plea condition (see *People v Amaker,*299 AD2d 238 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 625 [2003]) and properly sentenced him pursuant to the plea bargain.

Defendant’s federal due process argument was preserved, but it is unavailing. The plea agreement was not ambiguous *(compare Spence v Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility,*219 F3d 162 [2000]); hence, there were no ambiguities to be resolved in defendant’s favor. The People showed that defendant failed to meet all of the drug treatment program’s requirements.

The court, having expressly advised defendant before he took the plea that it was “absolutely” making no promise as to his sentence, did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment, given the violent nature of the crime *(see People v Victor J.,*283 AD2d 205, 206 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 942 [2001]; *People v Phillips,*289 AD2d 1021, 1021-1022 [2001]).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Williams, JJ.
William John FAILING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1605

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 87 FR 6902, 7 
February 2022.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Wednesday, February 
9, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following item will not be considered 
during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, February 9, 2022:
    <bullet> The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments 
to its whistleblower rules.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: February 7, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02914 Filed 2-7-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Scott MONACO, Brian Nicholson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a Florida municipality, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-14267

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Date Filed: 11/23/2016

*738Noah Scott Warman, D. Marcus Bras-well, Jr., Robert A. Sugarman, Dustin L. Watkins, Sugarman & Susskind, PA, Coral Gables, FL, Andrew D. Abramowitz, Daniel Mirachi, Philadelphia, PA, Mark S. Willis, Washington, DC, Spector Roseman Ko-droff <& Willis, PC, Mark David Bogen, Bogen law Group, PA, Boca Raton, FL, Tanisha Nunn Gary, Willie E. Gary, Gary Williams Finney Lewis Watson & Speran-do, PL, Stuart, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

David Jeffrey D’Agata, Martin County Attorney’s Office, Stuart, FL, Craig Dennis Feiser, Carol Mirando, Adina Teodor-escu, Office of General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, for Defen-dantr-Appellee.

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and ROSENBERG,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation

PER CURIAM:

We have had the benefit of oral argument, and have carefully reviewed the briefs of the parties and relevant parts of the summary judgment record. We conclude that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed on the basis of the excellent and comprehensive opinion of the district court rendered on September 30,2014.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.64

(NAVISITE LOGO)

Personal & Confidential

August 12, 2005

Monique Cormier
6164 Glen Holly Street
Las Angeles, CA 90068

RE: PROMOTION

Dear Monique:

NaviSite, Inc. ("NaviSite") is pleased to offer you the opportunity to be
promoted to General Counsel. In this new role you will be reporting to John
Gavin. If you decide to accept this position, your base pay will be $180,000,
less applicable withholdings. You will be located at the Andover location.
NaviSite may change your position, compensation, duties and work location from
time to time, as it deems appropriate.

Subject to the Board's approval, you will be granted an option to purchase
40,000 of shares of NaviSite's common stock in accordance with the NaviSite's
stock option plan with the purchase price for such shares being set at the
market price on the date of issuance by the Board. The option schedule will be
based on the NaviSite's stock plan. The options will be governed by and subject
to the terms, conditions and termination provisions of the NaviSite's standard
form of stock option agreement (which you will be required to sign in connection
with the issuance of your option).

To indicate your acceptance of this Promotion, please sign, date in the space
provided below and return it to Jessica Nazarian no later than August 15, 2005.
A duplicate original is enclosed for your records.

We look forward to your continued success and positive contributions to the
NaviSite Team.

Congratulations on your new role!

Sincerely,


/s/ Jessica Nazarian
------------------------------------
Jessica Nazarian
Manager, Human Resources

I accept the terms of this letter and agree to keep the terms of this letter
confidential.

/s/ Monique Cormier
----------------------------   ------------------   ----------------------------
Signature of Monique Cormier   Date                 Start Date
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

JAMES WALTHER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

FLORIDA TILE, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 3:18-cv-291

 Judge Thomas M. Rose

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE CONCERNING THE COURT’S 

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND STAYING THIS MATTER PENDING 

FURTHER ORDER

______________________________________________________________________________

In its Notice of Removal, Defendant Florida Tile, Inc. (“Florida Tile”) asserted that the 

citizenship of Defendant Jason Tackett (“Tackett”) should be disregarded for purposes of 

determining jurisdiction, despite the Complaint’s allegations that both Plaintiff James Walther 

(“Walther”) and Tackett are citizens of Ohio. (Doc. 1.) Although Walther did not respond or 

otherwise object to the Notice of Removal, “federal courts have a duty to consider their subject 

matter jurisdiction in regard to every case and may raise the issue sua sponte.” Answers in Genesis 

of Ky., Inc. v. Creation Ministries Int’l, Ltd., 556 F.3d 459, 465 (6th Cir. 2009). The parties are 

hereby made aware that the Sixth Circuit has held that “[t]he existence of subject matter 

jurisdiction is determined by examining the complaint as it existed at the time of removal.” Harper 

v. AutoAlliance Int’l, Inc., 392 F.3d 195, 210 (6th Cir. 2004). 

The Court ORDERS the parties to submit briefs on or before November 6, 2019 regarding 

the issue of whether this Court has proper subject matter jurisdiction over this case. The parties 

may file responses to any other party’s brief on or before November 13, 2019. The Court STAYS
2

this case and all pending deadlines, except with respect to this briefing, until the Court has issued 

a subsequent order concerning the issue of whether this Court has proper subject matter jurisdiction 

over this case. The phone conference currently set for November 8, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. is 

cancelled.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Wednesday, October 23, 2019. 

s/Thomas M. Rose

________________________________

THOMAS M. ROSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STATE EX REL. Fredrick Dewayne GIPSON v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0280

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CADDO**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington* , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 08/78-0163]

      ( print page 7893)    
Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 08/78-0163 issued to Bluestem Capital Partners III, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Bailey DeVries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2022-02830 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P