Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 5461 

1See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 

Strip from India: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 41949 (August 4, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films; 

Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.; and SKC, Inc. 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from 

India: Request for Extension of Briefing Schedule,’’ 

dated August 25, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene 

Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from 

India,’’ dated August 27, 2021. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated September 1, 2021. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental 

Questionnaire,’’ dated September 10, 2021. 

7See SRF’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

(PET) Film from India: Submission of 1st 

Supplemental Response of Anti-dumping Admin 

Review Questionnaire,’’ dated September 16, 2021 

(SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR). 

8See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

(PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 

9See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India— 

Briefing,’’ dated November 18, 2021. 

10See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 

2002) (Order). 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Jindal’s Final Analysis 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the 

signature of this Federal Register notice. 

12See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

(PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 

13See SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR at 7–8. See 

also Memorandum, ‘‘SRF’s Final Analysis 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the 

signature of this Federal Register notice. 

14See Preliminary Results PDM. 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–01956 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip from India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 4, 2021, the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 

and strip (PET film) from India. The 

period of review (POR) is July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020. We received no 

comments or requests for a hearing. We 

continue to find that sales of subject 

merchandise by Jindal Poly Films 

Limited (Jindal) and SRF Limited of 

India (SRF) were not made at less than 

normal value during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–5255. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results for 

this administrative review.1 In the 

Preliminary Results, we invited 

interested parties to comment within 30 

days. The petitioners 2 also requested an 

extension of the briefing schedule on 

August 25, 2021.3 Commerce issued a 

memorandum to all interested parties 

on August 27, 2021, which granted the 

petitioners’ request and stated that we 

would reset the deadlines to submit case 

briefs on a later date.4 On September 1, 

2021, we issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to SRF.5 On September 

10, 2021, we issued a supplemental 

questionnaire to Jindal.6 On September 

16, 2021, SRF submitted its response to 

our supplemental questionnaire.7 On 

September 24, 2021, Jindal submitted its 

response to our supplemental 

questionnaire.8 On November 18, 2021, 

Commerce extended these final results 

and then on November 23, 2021, 

Commerce established the revised 

deadlines for the briefing schedule.9 No 

interested party submitted comments or 

requested a hearing in this 

administrative review. The current 

deadline for these final results is 

January 28, 2022. Commerce conducted 

this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

Scope of the Order 10

The products covered by the Order 

are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or 

primed PET film, whether extruded or 

coextruded. Excluded are metalized 

films and other finished films that have 

had at least one of their surfaces 

modified by the application of a 

performance-enhancing resinous or 

inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 

inches thick. Imports of polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are 

currently classifiable in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under item number 

3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes. The written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

As noted above, Commerce received 

no comments concerning the 

Preliminary Results. Jindal submitted 

corrected information for a movement 

charge, which had been inadvertently 

omitted in its prior filings.11 Also, in 

response to instructions from 

Commerce, Jindal separated information 

for discounts and rebates that were 

grouped together.12 We incorporated 

these corrections and updated 

information into these final results; we 

continue to find that sales of subject 

merchandise by Jindal were not made at 

less than normal value during the POR. 

SRF submitted corrected information for 

its quantity discount as explained in its 

supplemental questionnaire.13 We also 

incorporated the corrections and 

updated information into these final 

results; we also continue to find that 

sales of subject merchandise made by 

SRF were not made at less than normal 

value during the POR. Accordingly, no 

decision memorandum accompanies 

this Federal Register notice. For further 

details of the issues addressed in this 

proceeding, see the Preliminary Results 

and the accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.14

Final Results of Review 

The final weighted-average dumping 

margins for the period July 1, 2019, 

through June 30, 2020, are as shown 

below: 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 
5462 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 

15See Order; see also Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) 

from India, 67 FR 34899 (May 16, 2002). 

1See Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Turkey: 

Preliminary Results and Rescission in Part of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2019, 

86 FR 54926 (October 5, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 54927. 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Jindal Poly Films Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. 0.00 

SRF Limited of India .................................................................................................................................................................. 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries in this review, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

Because we calculated a zero margin in 

the final results of this review for both 

Jindal and SRF, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to dumping duties. 

Commerce intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review. If 

a timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for Jindal and SRF will both 

be zero, the rate established in the final 

results of this review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

covered in this review, the cash deposit 

rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this or any previous 

review or in the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation but the 

manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any previous review 

or the investigation, the cash-deposit 

rate will continue to be the all-others 

rate of 5.71 percent, which is the allothers rate established by Commerce in 

the LTFV investigation.15 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation, 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 26, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–01960 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–489–825] 

Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From 

the Republic of Turkey: Final Results 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Ozdemir 

Boru Profil San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. 

(Ozdemir), exporter/producer of heavy 

walled rectangular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes (HWR pipes and tubes) 

from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), 

received de minimis net countervailable 

subsidies during the period of review, 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jaron Moore or Janae Martin, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3640 or (202) 482–0238, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 5, 2021, Commerce 

published the preliminary results of the 

administrative review with respect to 

Ozdemir,1 and gave interested parties an 

opportunity to comment.2 No interested 

party submitted comments. Commerce 

has conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 


tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE