alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ronnie L. HARRIS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

No. 16-5049 Consolidated with 16-5050

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: February 6, 2017

Ronnie L. Harris, Pro Se

John Perry Mannarino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Elizabeth Trosman, Esquire, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USAO Appellate Counsel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, (USA) Appellate Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee

BEFORE: Henderson and Brown, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the motions to proceed without a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in Nos. 16-5049, et al., including a request for appointment of counsel; the motion to dismiss the appeals for lack of a COA, and the opposition thereto; the motion for summary reversal and to proceed without a COA in No. 16-5050; the notices filed by appellant; the motion for change of address filed November 7, 2016; the motion for injunction; the motion for temporary restraining order; the motion for “judg[ jment on the pleading”; and the motion for other relief filed January 3, 2017, it is

ORDERED that the request for appointment of counsel be denied. The interests of justice do not warrant the appointment of counsel in this case. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal and to proceed without a COA be denied, and the motion to dismiss granted. Because appellant has not “made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), no COA is warranted. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions, including those seeking injunctive relief to transfer appellant to the District of Columbia, be denied. Appellant has not shown a basis for this court to grant the relief requested.

*2Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. Because no certificate of appealability has been allowed, no mandate will issue.
Elias Lou ABUSAID, Jr., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Melodi F. MCLAIN, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0395

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 09, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 3, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                     JUN-12-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-03-1996
<CASH>                                                 164,929
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            3,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                              5,638
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       181,812
<PP&E>                                                 303,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         510,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   35,416
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               404,951
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           510,827
<SALES>                                                113,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       113,746
<CGS>                                                   39,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           84,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         4,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      (1,073)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         25,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (9,609)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            15,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.38
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.21
ACTION BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 
BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN


The undersigned, being duly designated as the Administrator of the Benefit Equalization Plan (the “Plan”) with the authority to amend the Plan where the amendment or amendments to the Plan do not increase the annual expenditure of the Plan by more than $500,000, hereby amends the Plan as follows:


WHEREAS, it has been determined to amend the Plan to exclude non-banded employees from accruing future benefits in the Plan.


NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby:


RESOLVED, that the Plan, as amended and in effect to the date hereof, be further amended as set forth below, effective January 1, 2019.


Article I, Section (r) is amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof:


An Employee shall not include individuals who are not designated by the Company as being in a lettered salary band, but only with respect to any benefit earned under the Profit-Sharing Plan or the Retirement Plan on or after January 1, 2018.








Dated: December 21, 2018


/s/ SCOTT SCOFIELD
Scott Scofield,
Administrator
Exhibit
32


Section
1350 Certifications




STATEMENT
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer or Principal Accounting
Officer of Lightbridge Corporation. This Certification is made pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Lightbridge Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2008.





The
undersigned certifies that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lightbridge Corporation as of December 31, 2008.





This
Certification is executed as of November 19, 2009.





By:
      /s/ Seth GraeName:
      Seth GraeTitle:
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)By:
      /s/ James GuerraName:
      James GuerraTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lightbridge Corporation and will be retained by Lightbridge Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Rico S. YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4728

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.t
 371 E STREET t
 CHULA VISTA t
 CALIFORNIA 91910-2615t
t
 TELEPHONE (858) 722-5953 t
 FAX (858) 408-2695  t
 FAX (619) 422-1465t
 E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.comt









August 14, 2006







To Whom It May Concern:



The firm of Chang G. Park, CPA  consents to the inclusion of our report of July 28, 2006 on the audited financial statements of WorldTadeShow.com, Inc. as of April 30, 2006, in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,







---



Member of the California Society of Certified Public Accountants
Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 4, 2013

t0225

Order 

March 4, 2013

146473 & (54)

ABERDEEN OF BRIGHTON, L.L.C.,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 146473

COA: 301826

MI Tax Tribunal: 00-345517

CITY OF BRIGHTON,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2012 judgment of the Court of 

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

VIVIANO, J., not participating.
Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Rentrak Corporation:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Forms S-8 (No. 33-40472, No. 33-44864, No. 333-28565,  and No. 333-62523) and
on Forms S-3 (No. 33-86548 and No. 33-65463) on Form 10-K of Rentrak Corporation
of our report  dated  June 9, 2003,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance
sheets of Rentrak  Corporation  and  subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003 and 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended March 31, 2003,
and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the March
31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Rentrak Corporation.

KPMG LLP


Portland, Oregon
June 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W.
Brantley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Leland W. Brantley, Jr.Leland W. Brantley, Jr. Chief Financial Officer November 10, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Carl M. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leon J. VINCENT, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 300, Docket 74-1294.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 5, 1974.

Decided Dec. 6, 1974.

Paula Van Meter, New York City, for petitioner-appellant.

David R. Spiegel, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Samuel A. Hirschowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and ANDERSON and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robinson’s case is no stranger to us, this being the second time he has sought to reverse the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. On his first appeal, we found that the petitioner was denied his right to counsel at the police station showup, *see*United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). Accordingly, we reversed the district court with instructions to determine whether there was clear and convincing evidence of an independent source for the in-court identification. United States ex rel. Robinson v. Zelker, 468 F.2d 159, 163 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 939, 93 S.Ct. 1892, 36 L.Ed.2d 401 (1973). Following an evidentiary hearing, the district judge found that there was clear and convine*924ing evidence of such a source. We believe Judge Cooper applied the appropriate *Wade*standard in weighing the evidence, *see*United States ex rel. Robinson v. Vincent, 371 F.Supp. 409, 415, 418, 423 (S.D.N.Y.1974), and we are of the view that his factual findings were not clearly erroneous. The alleged prejudicial errors committed by the state trial judge, the District Attorney, and petitioner’s counsel during the state trial were not raised below, and therefore cannot be considered on appeal. United States ex rel. Springle v. Follette, 435 F.2d 1380, 1384 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 980, 91 S.Ct. 1214, 28 L.Ed.2d 331 (1971). Accordingly, we affirm.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel; COI-K99-Curation.
    Date: March 25, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Video Assisted Meeting.
    Contact Person: Jan Li, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 
Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-496-3114, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#234f4a491112634e424a4f0d4d4a4b0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc1c4c79f9cedc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02789 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### EXHIBIT 99.1



### Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William N. Hagler, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.

Date:   February 15, 2006/s/ William N.
HaglerWilliam N.
HaglerPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 30616 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Brandon Holmes,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:21 - CR - 302 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Elrod,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Brandon Holmes appeals his sentence of 204 months of imprisonment following his guilty plea conviction for distributing methamphetamine. He contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable and that the district court erroneously balanced the 18 U. S.C. § 3553(a) factors, giving undue weight to his criminal history and the resulting sentencing range calculated

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 25, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30616 Document: 00516725076 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2023No. 22 - 30616

2 under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 without adequately considering the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities. We review the substantive reasona bleness of his sentence for abuse of discretion, and we apply a presumption of reasonableness to his within - guidelines range sentence. See Holguin - Hernandez v. United States , 140 S. Ct. 762, 766 - 67 (2020); United States v. Naidoo , 995 F.3d 367, 382 (5th C ir. 2021) . Here, the district court considered the Guidelines, § 3553(a), and Holmes’s arguments for a downward variance , but it ultimately concluded that the guidelines range was appropriate . Holmes’s arguments on appeal amount to mere disagreement with the weight that the court placed on his mitigating arguments and the sentence imposed, which is insufficient to support his contention that his sentence is unreasonable. See United States v. Aldawsari , 740 F.3d 1015, 1021 - 22 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Ruiz , 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, Holmes has failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness applicable to his within - guidelines range sentence and has not shown that the district court abused its discretion . See Naidoo , 995 F.3d at 382 - 83 ; United States v. Hernandez , 876 F.3d 161, 166 - 67 (5th Cir. 2017). **AFFIRMED** . Case: 22-30616 Document: 00516725076 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2023
Ronald Jean BAPTISTE, Philogene Schiller, Jeannine Charles, Junon Brutus and J & R Enterprises, Inc., Appellants, v. SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOCIATIONS OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS, Antoine Alexandre, Renoir Marcellus, Guigal Congregation of Seventh Day Adventists, Inc., and Guigal Community Center, Inc., Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-992

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
# SECNAV Del Toro Statement on General Eric Smith, the 39th Commandant of the Marine Corps

#### 30 Oct 2023

Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. Eric M. Smith experienced a medical emergency on the evening of Oct. 29, 2023, and has been hospitalized.

Due to the vacancy in the Office of the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 8044, the most senior officer of the Marine Corps in the Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, Lt. Gen. Karsten Heckl, is performing the duties of the Commandant.

Additional information regarding the condition of Gen. Smith will be released at a later time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9378-01-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities Advisory Committee (FRRCC) is in the public interest and is necessary in connection with the performance of EPA's duties. Accordingly, the FRRCC will be renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the FRRCC is to provide advice and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on environmental issues and policies that are of importance to agriculture and rural communities. Inquiries may be directed to Venus Welch-White, Designated Federal Officer or Emily Selia, Alternate Designated Federal Officer for the FRRCC, U.S. EPA, (Mail Code 1101A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, or                         *FRRCC@epa.gov.*

 Dated: January 27, 2022.

Rodney Snyder,

Agriculture Advisor to the EPA Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2022-02791 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P