UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-4186

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDDIE LEE MCRAE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 21-4308

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDDIE LEE MCRAE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cr-00268-LMB-1)

Submitted: June 27, 2022 Decided: August 29, 2022

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4308 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 5
2

Before KING, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Matthew B. Kaplan, KAPLAN LAW FIRM, Arlington, Virginia, for 

Appellant. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4308 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 5
3

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Lee McRae pleaded guilty to three counts of brandishing a firearm during 

and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(a)(ii). The 

predicate crime of violence for two of the counts was armed bank robbery, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and for the final count, Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 

U.S.C. § 1951(a). The district court sentenced McRae to the statutory minimum of 84 

months on each count, to be served consecutively, for a total term of 252 months’ 

imprisonment. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal but questioning 

whether McRae knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal and whether armed 

bank robbery and Hobbs Act robbery constitute valid crimes of violence for his § 924(c) 

convictions. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to the appellate 

waiver in McRae’s plea agreement. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and 

dismiss in part. 

We review the validity of an appellate waiver de novo and “will enforce the waiver 

if it is valid and the issue appealed is within the scope of the waiver.” United States v. 

Adams, 814 F.3d 178, 182 (4th Cir. 2016). A waiver is valid if it is “knowing and 

voluntary.” Id. To determine whether a waiver is knowing and voluntary, “we consider 

the totality of the circumstances, including the experience and conduct of the defendant, 

his educational background, and his knowledge of the plea agreement and its terms.” 

United States v. McCoy, 895 F.3d 358, 362 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotations marks 

omitted). Generally, “if a district court questions a defendant regarding the waiver of 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4308 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 3 of 5
4

appellate rights during the [Fed. R. Crim. P.] 11 colloquy and the record indicates that the 

defendant understood the full significance of the waiver, the waiver is valid.” Id. (internal 

quotation marks omitted).

Before accepting a guilty plea, the district court must conduct a plea colloquy in 

which it informs the defendant of, and determines the defendant understands, the rights he 

is relinquishing by pleading guilty, the charges to which he is pleading, and the maximum 

and mandatory minimum penalties he faces. Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1). The court must 

also ensure that the plea is voluntary and not the result of any threats, force, or promises 

not contained in the plea agreement, Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(2), and that there is a factual 

basis for the plea, Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(3). Because McRae did not seek to withdraw his 

guilty plea, we review the adequacy of the Rule 11 hearing for plain error. United States 

v. Williams, 811 F.3d 621, 622 (4th Cir. 2016). “Under the plain error standard, [we] will 

correct an unpreserved error if (1) an error was made; (2) the error is plain; (3) the error 

affects substantial rights; and (4) the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public 

reputation of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Harris, 890 F.3d 480, 491 (4th Cir. 

2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the district court 

complied with the requirements of Rule 11 and ensured that McRae was competent to plead 

guilty and was pleading guilty knowingly and voluntarily. Moreover, our review of the 

record confirms that McRae knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his 

convictions and sentence. We therefore conclude that the waiver is valid and enforceable. 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4308 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 4 of 5
5

Counsel also questions whether Hobbs Act robbery and armed bank robbery are

crimes of violence and, therefore, whether McRae’s § 924(c) convictions are invalid. 

However, as counsel concedes, we have held that both Hobbs Act robbery and armed bank 

robbery constitute crimes of violence. United States v. Mathis, 932 F.3d 242, 265-66 (4th 

Cir. 2019) (Hobbs Act robbery); United States v. McNeal, 818 F.3d 141, 157 (4th Cir. 

2016) (armed bank robbery). 

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record in these appeals and 

have found no potentially meritorious issues outside the scope of McRae’s valid appellate 

waiver. We therefore grant the Government’s motion to dismiss in part and dismiss the 

appeal as to all issues within the scope of the waiver. We affirm as to any issue outside the 

scope of the waiver. This court requires that counsel inform McRae, in writing, of the right 

to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If McRae requests 

that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then 

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s 

motion must state that a copy thereof was served on McRae. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, 

DISMISSED IN PART

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4308 Doc: 25 Filed: 08/29/2022 Pg: 5 of 5