alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     I, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGenBiologics, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and 15d — 15(e)) for the registrant andhave:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 14, 2003       By: /s/ GERALD E. BISBEE, JR.        Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.    *President and*
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000883573
<NAME>                       F-1000 Futures Fund L.P., Series VIII
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   1,718,634
<SECURITIES>                                             5,823,379
<RECEIVABLES>                                              376,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         7,918,079
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           7,918,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      535,873
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                               7,382,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             7,918,079
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            (6,061)
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            51,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (57,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (57,392)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (10.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 CITY OF SANTA FE ex rel. 

3 SANTA FE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

4 Petitioner-Appellee,

5 v. No. A-1-CA-36579

6 ONE (1) 1999 TAN AUDI SEDAN

7 V.I.N. WAUED28D9XA318391

8 NEW MEXICO LICENSE NO. 779TLZ,

9 Respondent,

10 and

11 ROSAMARIA ROMERO,

12 Claimant-Appellant.

13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

14 Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge 

15 Office of the City Attorney

16 R. Alfred Walker

17 Santa Fe, NM

18 for Appellee

19 Rosamaria Romero

20 Santa Fe, NM 
2

1 Pro Se Appellant

2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

3 VANZI, Chief Judge.

4 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

5 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

6 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

7 {2} DISMISSED.

8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

9 __________________________________

10 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

11 WE CONCUR:

12 _________________________________

13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

14 _________________________________

15 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
EX PARTE Edmond Kennies BURKE

1160303 (CR-15-1469)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 32


Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Title 18 U.S.C.


CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Richard B. Handler, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Peregrine C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer, of Jefferies Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended November 30, 2016 (the “Form 10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


*        *        *


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/s/ Richard B. Handler/s/ Peregrine C. BroadbentRichard B. HandlerPeregrine C. BroadbentDate:February 28, 2017Date:February 28, 2017


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Jefferies Group LLC and will be retained by Jefferies Group LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4851

_____________________________
J ON C OHEN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Angela M. Cox , Judge

. August 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Jon Cohen, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION





Exhibit
32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended July 5, 2008 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy IT
      Solutions, Inc.








August
8, 2008


/s/KeithR.CooganKeith R. CooganChief
      Executive Officer and President








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Thaddeus MCKINNON, Appellant, v. Michelle Lee PELT, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1541

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 21.1****LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**   **Name of Subsidiary** **Jurisdiction of Organization**Resources Connection LLC DelawareNames under which Resources Connection LLC does business:  Resources Global Professionals  Resources Connection LLC  Re:sources Connection LLC  RCTC LLC  RCTC  Resources Connection LLC of Delaware  Resources Connection LLC DBA RCTC  Resources Connection LLC, a limited liability company of Delaware     RC Management Group, LLC Delaware   RCG, LP Texas   RECN of Texas, LP TexasNames under which RECN of Texas LP does business:  Resources Global Professionals LP     Resources Audit Solutions, LLC Delaware   RC Holdings I, LLC Delaware   RC Holdings II, LLC Delaware   RGP Property LLC Delaware   Resources Connection Australia Pty Ltd. AustraliaNames under which Resources Connection Australia Pty Ltd. does business:  Resources Global Professionals     Resources Global Professionals (Belgium) NV Belgium   Resources Global Professionals, Inc. (Canada) Canada   Resources Global Enterprise Consulting (Beijing) Co. People’s Republic of China   Resources Global Professionals (HK) Limited Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China   Resources Global Professionals (Denmark) AS Denmark   Resources Global Professionals (France) SAS France   Resources Global Professionals (India) Private Ltd. India   Resources Global Professionals (Ireland) Ireland   Resources Global Professionals (Italy) SRL Italy   Resources Global Professionals Japan K.K. Japan   Resources Global Professionals (Luxembourg) SA Luxembourg   Resources Management Mexico S de RL de CV Mexico   Resources Connection Mexico S de RL de CV Mexico
 

 
   **Name of Subsidiary** **Jurisdiction of Organization**Resources Global Professionals (Europe) BV Netherlands   Resources Global Professionals Holdings BV Netherlands   Resources Management & Finance b.v. Netherlands   Resources Projects b.v. Netherlands   Resources Global Professionals (Norway) AS Norway   Resources Global Professionals (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Singapore   Resources Global Professionals Sweden AB Sweden   Resources Connection Taiwan Ltd. Taipei, Taiwan   Resources Connection (UK) Ltd. United Kingdom (England and Wales)   Names under which Resources Connection (UK) Ltd. does business:  Resources Global Professionals (UK)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 11

- 00747

- CR

Terry Joe NEWMAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR4708A

The Honorable Angus McGinty, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 24, 2013.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Capra RIVERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2905

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 14, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Gary L. SEYMOUR, Appellant/petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Bryant Jermaine BRADSHAW, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1228

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7433

ANTONIO DOUGLAS WINSLOW, a/k/a Troy Winslow,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-97-1095-2)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Douglas Winslow, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Winslow seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant

Winslow leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Winslow v. Angelone, No. CA-97-1095-2 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
STATE EX REL. Walter C. GIBSON, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2017-KH-0590

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

**ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA**

PER CURIAM:

Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; *State ex rel. Glover v. State* , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated his second application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

HUGHES, J., recused.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned  officer  of  Nighthawk Systems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:



The  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 (the "Form  10-KSB  ") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained  in  the  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.





|                         |  |     |                                                     | 
|------------------------ |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:  April  15,  2008 |  | By: | H. Douglas  Saathoff                                | 
|                         |  |     | H.  Douglas  Saathoff                               | 
|                         |  |     | Chief  Executive Officer                            | 
|                         |  |     | and  Principal  Accounting  and  Financial  Officer |
Phillip Craig DESMUKE, DOC #18788, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1102

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RONALD CARL BURCHAM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4916 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 22, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, Judge. Ronald Carl Burcham, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Anthony J. PRYOR, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D17-1856

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 26, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 194

- C V


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF S.F.O., A.S.O., A.M.O., A.A.O.,

AND A.S.O., CHILDREN

On Appellant’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File a Brief



# ORDER

Before Justices Benavides , Perkes , and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. The brief of the
appellant, A.O., was due to be filed on May 4, 2020. Appellant has filed a motion for
extension of time seeking twenty days of additional time to file the brief.
Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the
rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals
, but include additional expedited
deadlines and procedures. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 28.4; T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a). The2

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that
these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of
appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6.2(a).
Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion for extension of time and ORDER
appellant’s brief to be filed on or before May 2 6 , 2020. No further extensions of time will
be granted absent truly exigent and extraordinary circumstances

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 4th day of May , 20 20

.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act
                           and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------


I, Nestor Szwarcberg, Chief Financial Officer of Carmel Container Systems, Ltd.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

(1)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal
     year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), filed with the U.S. Securities
     and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  June 27, 2004

                                               /s/ Nestor Swarcberg
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Nestor Szwarcberg
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that I, Robert E. Lester, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify:

         1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the
year  ended  December  31,  2003 (the "Form  10-KSB")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of  section  13(a) or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the  information  contained in the 10-KSB  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert E. Lester
--------------------
Robert E. Lester
Chief Financial Officer

Date:    April 13, 2004
Bruce D. BERLINGER, Petitioner, v. Roberta Sue CASSELBERRY f/k/a Sue C. Berlinger, Respondent.

Case No. 2D17-4519

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.