alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

WESTERN DIVISION

PAULA ZELESNIK,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GENERAL ELECTRIC, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 Case No. 1:18-cv-433

 Judge Timothy S. Black

 Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman

DECISION AND ENTRY 

ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6) AND 

TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United 

States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the 

Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on July 11, 2018, 

submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 6). No objections were filed.

 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has 

reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo 

all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 

determine that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in 

its entirety. 

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above:

1) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), the complaint (Doc. 1-1) is 

DISMISSED with prejudice.
2

2) The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal of this 

Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave 

to appeal in forma pauperis.

3) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is 

TERMINATED from the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge

10/3/18
EX PARTE Samantha WRIGHT

CR-16-0300

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Habeas corpus pet. dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1365 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 

statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2021 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. CARSON, and Mr. LOWENTHAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson statue and marble base in Lafayette 

Square in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Andrew Jackson Stat5 ue Removal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ANDREW JACKSON STATUE. 

7 (a) REMOVAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

8 ensure that the Andrew Jackson statue and marble base 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1365 IH

1 is removed from Lafayette Square in the District of Co2 lumbia. 

3 (b) DONATION.—The Secretary shall donate the An4 drew Jackson statue and marble base to a museum or 

5 other similar entity. The recipient of the statue and base 

6 may not store, display, or exhibit the statue outside. If 

7 the statue is stored, displayed, or exhibited outside, owner8 ship of the statue and marble base will revert back to the 

9 Federal Government. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                                                               |  | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ J. Donald Boggus, Jr.                                                     |  | 
| |  | J. Donald Boggus, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer November 13, 2006 |  |
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADDED BY**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of the Company as of and for the period covered by the report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Willem Ackermans                                                 |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Willem                Ackermans                                                     |
|                                |   | Chief                Financial Officer(Principal                Accounting Officer) |

----
Paul Kent CLARK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
EARNINGS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30,
1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       8,274,000
<SECURITIES>                                   608,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,186,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,528,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,151,000
<PP&E>                                     125,451,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             159,438,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,537,000
<BONDS>                                     12,100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   100,252,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,021,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,438,000
<SALES>                                     63,323,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,350,000
<CGS>                                       22,749,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,760,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               339,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,101,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,230,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,871,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,871,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<FN>
<F1>ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
<F2>PRIMARY EPS IS CALCULATED USING A WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
OF 11,661,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Y.L., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
T.M., a juvenile, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-1878

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 229TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DUVAL COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on March 25, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Peter Barton, Appellant

V.

Ana Lisa Garza, Appellee

No. 04-14-00207-CV and Tr. Ct. No. DC-12-308

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the

judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellee Ana

Lisa Garza recover her costs of this appeal from Appellant Peter Barton.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on June 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00207-CV

Peter Barton

v.

Ana Lisa Garza

(NO. DC-12-308 IN 229TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DUVAL COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

MOTION FEE

$578.00

$10.00

$10.00

$100.00

$25.00

$50.00

$20.00

$10.00

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

HECTOR GONZALEZ, PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

HECTOR GONZALEZ

DARRELL BARGER

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this June 3, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000882973
<NAME> CHESTNUT PARNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,443,498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,659,801
<PP&E>                                         743,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,154,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,251,419
<BONDS>                                     13,505,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,154,142
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,873,558
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,608,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (899,300)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                693,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   693,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
Kathleen M. WEISS a/k/a Kathleen M. Weiss O'Neil, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee FOR NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONMORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AR4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., s/b/m Wachovia Bank, N.A., Sunset Lakes Master Association, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4D17-1212

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 6, 2018]

Jonathan Kline of Jonathan Kline, P.A., Weston, for appellant.

Karusha Y. Sharp, and M. Hope Keating of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee; and Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2005-AR4.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See**Bolous v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n* , 210 So.3d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Warner, Taylor, and Levine, JJ., concur.
Wesley BOOKER, a/k/a Wesley K. Booker, Jr., a/k/a Wesley Keith Booker, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5242

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



(18 U.S.C. 1350)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant Talk Communications Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Annual Report
                                         on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”) of the
                                         Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                                         Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information
                                         contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial
                                         condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 1, 2015 | /s/ Mark Nije                      | 
|------------------- | ---------------------------------- | 
|                    | Mark Nije, Chief Financial Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben GONZALEZ-ROCHA, also known as Ruben Rocha Gonzalez, also known as Ruben Gonzalez, also known as Ruben Rocha, also known as Hugo Gonzalez, also known as Jorge Luis Garcia, also known as Ruben Garcia Rocha, Defendant-Appellant

No. 16-20825 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed September 29, 2017

Amy Howell Alaniz, Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Brittany Carroll Lacayo, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Ruben Gonzalez-Rocha pleaded guilty to illegal reentry of a deported alien and was sentenced within the advisory guidelines range to 29 months of imprisonment and a two-year term of supervised release. On appeal, Gonzalez-Rocha argues that the district court incorrectly assessed one criminal history point to his March 2003 conviction for assault causing bodily injury to a family member because the conviction was too remote in time to be counted under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e).

Gonzalez-Rocha correctly concedes that review is for plain error. To show plain error, he must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. *Puckett v. United States,*556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009). If he makes such a showing, we have the discretion to correct the error but should do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. *Id.*

At a minimum, Gonzalez-Rocha has not satisfied the third and fourth prongs of the plain error test. As to whether his substantial rights were affected, his criminal history category and guidelines range remain the same after subtraction of the contested criminal history point. Gonzalez-Rocha thus fails to demonstrate “a reasonable probability that, but for the district court’s error, [he] would have received a lower sentence.” *United States v. Davis,*602 F.3d 643, 647 (5th Cir. 2010).

Finally, we “do not view the fourth prong as automatic if the other three prongs are met,” but will exercise our discretion when “a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.” *United States v. Escalante-Reyes,*689 F.3d 415, 425 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Gonzalez-Rocha does not even attempt to demonstrate that he can meet this standard, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that we *196should exercise our discretion to correct any error.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Joey CAMACHO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0234

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Michael J. LITTLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 18, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 18, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15A0941. DOROTHY NASH v. KROGER COMPANY et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Michael BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3183

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 8, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Ezell GEDDIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-1049

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Neimeth, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 /s/ Christopher
      NeimethJune
      27, 2008
              Christopher
      NeimethChief
      Executive Officer