alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30792 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FREDDIE FRANCIS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-20028-9

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Freddie Francis, Jr., has filed a motion for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Because Francis’ motion for leave to file an untimely notice of appeal was filed beyond the 40-day period prescribed in Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4), the district court was without authority to grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal based on excusable neglect or good cause. See United States v. Awalt , 728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984). Therefore, we lackNo. 00-30792 -2- jurisdiction to consider Francis’ appeal. See id. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The order consolidating this appeal with United States v. Vezia , No. 00-30328 and United States v. Milburne , No. 00-30372 is RESCINDED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Accident Prevention Plus, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Schwartz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                               /S/Alan Schwartz
                                               -----------------------
                                               Alan Schwartz
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               April 26, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 05-1886

DOMINGOS JOAO LIBERAL DE ARAUJO,

Petitioner,

v.

ALBERTO R. GONZÁLES,

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on August 11, 2006, is

amended as follows:

On page 11, line 10, insert "he" between "that" and "is

therefore not removable".
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Santos, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 314]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered January 7, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his videotaped statement since it was sufficiently attenuated from the taint of a warrantless arrest made in violation of *Payton v New York*(445 US 573 [1980]). The videotaped statement to an assistant district attorney was taken about six hours after the arrest and was made after *Miranda*warnings and waivers. There was also a substantial break of more than three hours between an earlier statement to a detective, which the court suppressed, and the videotaped statement, which was conducted by a different interrogator *(see People v Chen Ren*Jie, 280 AD2d 301 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 798 [2001]). The record also supports the court’s finding that the *Payton*violation was not flagrant.

The court properly denied defendant’s request for a missing witness charge as to the detective who took defendant’s initial written statement, which had been suppressed but which was nevertheless elicited by defendant at trial as a tactical device. The court correctly concluded that the witness could not provide *318any noncumulative testimony *(see People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424 [1986]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,142
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,113
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,630
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 229,856
<DEPOSITS>                                     170,380
<SHORT-TERM>                                    30,148
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,117
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 229,856
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,648
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  156
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   286
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,090
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,124
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,824
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,266
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    781
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         781
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       624
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,787
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,991
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F1>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>This information is not disclosed in the Form 10-QSB
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136181 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136181 COA: 282525 Genesee CC: 03-011521-FC MONTEZ LEONDRE COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
Johnnie A. PITTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3793

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Johnnie A. Pittman, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Johnson v. State*, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Sweet v. State*, 987 So. 2d 747 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; *Waiter v. State*, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Haynes v. State*, 106 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) ; *Paul v. State*, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 5 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00644

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.D.S., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013

- 24757

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a n order signed June 7, 2019 in a suit to modify the parent

- child relationship. The notice of appeal was filed August 21 , 2019

. N o clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that appellant , M.S., did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On October 14, 2019 , the court notified all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No such proof has been filed.2

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing in voluntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justice Wise, Jewell, and Poissant

.
Daniel ESPOSITO, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0165

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02830]



[[Page 7893]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 08/78-0163]


Bluestem Capital Partners III, L.P.; Surrender of License of 
Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 08/78-0163 issued to 
Bluestem Capital Partners III, L.P., said license is hereby declared 
null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-02830 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 33-881100) pertaining to the 1993 Non-Employee Directors Stock OptionIncentive Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-81124)pertaining to the 1991 Long-Term Employee Stock Option Plan, the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-88744) pertaining to the 2000 EmployeeStock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43631)pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149674) pertaining to the2007 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3No. 333-155051) pertaining to the 2008 shelf registration of securitiesand the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161484) pertainingto the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our reports dated February 24,2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofAlmost Family, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Almost Family, Inc. and subsidiaries,included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2009.

 

 

/s/Ernst & Young, LLP

 

 

Louisville,Kentucky

February 24,2010

 

----
J~~-tE0 STq r

~

S 

4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

o ~~~/J Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

2 ~il{ff a 

F,~ 0 IqC ~O

I

~G~~ 

JUL 3 0 20 ~~ 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated July 29, 2013, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 

(EPA's) concurrence on the draft expansion memo to the certification of the Los Alamos National 

Laboratory (LANL). The purpose of the memo is to expand the site's certification to add the Mobile In 

Situ Object Counting System Large Container Counter (MILCC), which EPA approved on July 22, 

2013. Based on our review, we concur with CBFO's draft expansion memo which will allow LANLCCP to characterize waste using the MILCC. 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU waste are appropriately 

included in Attachment 4 of the draft expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, 

procedures and processes included in the memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expansion memo for LANL-CCP. If 

you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (202) 343-9422 or Rajani Joglekar at (202) 

343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Site Documents, CBFO 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
Director
Compensation


Committee
Approved January 22, 2008


Board
Approved February 19, 2008


Effective
January 1, 2008





Board of Director
Retainer:


Outside
directors to receive an annual retainer of $24,000 to be paid monthly ($2,000)
at the beginning of the month following the month of
service.  Directors may miss a maximum of two scheduled board meetings
without penalty.





Special Service
Retainer


Special
service retainers are paid the month following the end of the quarter for the
following service





Board
Chair $1,500


Audit
Chair $1,500


Compensation
Chair $500


Governance/Nominating
Chair$500


ALCO
Chair $500





Committee
Meetings


In
addition to the annual retainer, attendance at committee meetings entitles
outside directors to additional compensation as shown below.





Committee
            Meeting
              FeeAudit
              In-person
      meetings
              Scheduled
      telephone meetings
            $150
              $100ALCO
            $100Compensation
            $100Executive
            $100Governance/Nominating
            $100





Equity
Compensation


Annually,
subject to full board approval and vesting qualifications, outside directors
will receive an equity award (restricted stock) with an economic value
approximating 25% of the annual retainer or $6,000.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the  undersigned,  Randall  H.  Pierce,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Lone Star
Steakhouse &  Saloon,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation  (the "Company"),  does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 23, 2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                          /s/ Randall H. Pierce
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Randall H. Pierce
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                                         May 3, 2004
```
Ayesha HILL, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-5089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
#### Joni KLYANA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Craig APKER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-15334

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 14, 2017

Joni Klyana, Pro Se

Heidi Adams, Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Dale Patrick, Esquire, Taft Correctional Institution, Taft, CA, Michael Gordon Tierney, Assistant U.S. Attorney, *549DOJ-USAO, Fresno, CA, for Respondent-Appellee

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Joni Klyana appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. We review the denial of a section 2241 petition de novo, *see United States v. Lemoine,*546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

Klyana contends that the sentencing court improperly delegated its authority to schedule his restitution payments. This claim is belied by the record, which reflects that the sentencing court properly assessed Klyana’s ability to pay and ordered that he make payments of not less than $25 per quarter during his term of imprisonment as part of the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (“IFRP”). *See*18 U.S.C. § 3664(f)(2); *Lemoine,*546 F.3d at 1046 (upholding identical restitution order). We reject Klyana’s contention that he is exempted from the regulations of the IFRP because he is housed at a government-owned, contractor-operated facility. *See Lemoine,*546 F.3d at 1046 n.2 (federal inmate remains in federal custody, and thus subject to the Bureau of Prisons’ authority through the IFRP, even where he is housed at an “independently operated” facility).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Nathanael Lenard REYNOLDS, Appellant v. Tyler B. BROWN, Assistant Solicitor and Earnest A. Finney, III, Head Solicitor, Appellees

No. 16-7022

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: March 16, 2017

Rehearing En Banc Denied June 6, 2017

Nathanael Lenard Reynolds, Pro Se

BEFORE: Kavanaugh and Millett, Circuit Judges, and Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order, filed January 20, 2016, dismissing the complaint upon the motion of appellant, be affirmed. Appellant does not argue that this dismissal was in error.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.14(b)


Schedule identifying Non-Employee Directors 
of Park National Corporation covered by form 
of Split-Dollar Agreement,  made and 
  entered into effective as of December 28, 2007  


The following directors of Park National Corporation (“Park”) are covered by Split-Dollar Agreements (the “Split-Dollar Agreements”) as identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements are identical to the form of Split-Dollar Agreement, made and entered into effective as of December 28, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed on January 2, 2008 (File No. 1-13006):


	
			
	Name of Director
	Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to
Split-Dollar Agreement
	Date of Split-
Dollar Agreement

	 
	 
	 

	Donna M. Alvarado
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	F. William Englefield IV
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Robert E. O’Neill
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007

	Mark R. Ramser
	The Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon)
	December 28, 2007

	Rick R. Taylor
	The Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The Richland Trust Company)
	December 28, 2007

	Leon Zazworsky
	The Park National Bank
	December 28, 2007