alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Betty WILLIAMS, Appellee v. PARKSIDE CONDOMINIUM TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION, Appellant

No. 16-7116

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed On: March 3, 2017

l:01-cv-01098-AK

Johnnie D. Bond, Jr., Esquire, Attorney, Bond Law Firm, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Benny Lee Kass, Attorney, John H. Brillian, Kass, Mitek & Kass PLLC, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellant’s consent motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted and this case be dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith to the district court.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

136 

CA 14-01066 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ANTWAN THOMPSON, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

ANTWAN THOMPSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Seneca County

(Dennis F. Bender, A.J.), dated April 28, 2014 in a proceeding

purusant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Loafin’ Tree Rest. v Pardi [appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d

985, 985). 

Entered: February 11, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2016-0459

 Directorate Identifier: 2015NM081AD

A330-32-3269 --- 02/17/2015

A340-32-4301 --- 02/17/2015

A340-32-5115 --- 02/17/2015

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
ERIKA C. WRIGHT, CSR

Official Court Reporter

210th District Court

546-2130 Ext. 3600

ewright@epcounty.com

September 4, 2018

Denise Pacheco, Clerk

Court of Appeals

Eighth District of Texas

500 East San Antonio Street, Suite 1203

El Paso, Texas 79901

Re: No. 08-18-00084-CR

Manuel Alejandro Valmana v. State of Texas

Dear Ms. Pacheco, 

I, Erika Wright, received a notice of appeal and request for record in the abovestyled and referenced cause. The due date was July 1, 2018 from the notice that I have 

in front of me. I did receive a call from COA today and I believe the due date was later 

August. Either way, I am not finished with this record. I am producing a capital murder 

up on appeal. I believe I’m on my last extension, and it is due September 19, 2018.

Would you please allow an extension in this matter? I would ask for 30 days if 

possible. I know that the capital murder will take the rest of September. 

Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me with any questions 

regarding this matter. 

/s/Erika C. Wright 

Erika C. Wright, CSR 

Official Court Reporter 

210th District Court

 FILED IN 8th COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 9/4/2018 2:14:00 PM DENISE PACHECO Clerk
Luis CORDERO, Appellant, v. CRESTWYND BAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as a Nominee for Countrywide KB Home Loans, a CountryWide Mortgage Ventures, LLC, Appellees.

Case No. 5D17-1973

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 3, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Daniel LYTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3906

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

Daniel Lytle, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Ratliff v. State*, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005) ; *Adaway v. State*, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005) ; *Hanf v. State*, 182 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; *Enriquez v. State*, 885 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

KHOUZAM, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:
(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: March 30, 2005 /s/  STEVEN A. KRIEGSMAN   Steven A. Kriegsman   Chief Executive Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to CytRx Corporation and will be retained by CytRxCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that:
(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: March 30, 2005 /s/  MATTHEW NATALIZIO   Matthew Natalizio   Chief Financial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to CytRx Corporation and will be retained by CytRxCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1445 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1445

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from changing the names of 
certain memorials or move any statues related to certain wars, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2021

   Mr. Carl introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from changing the names of 
certain memorials or move any statues related to certain wars, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Heritage Protection Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CHANGING NAMES AND MOVING STATUES.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall not--
            (1) change the name of or alter in any way--
                    (A) the Lincoln Memorial;
                    (B) the Jefferson Memorial;
                    (C) the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial;
                    (D) the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial;
                    (E) the Theodore Roosevelt Island; or
                    (F) the Washington Monument; or
            (2) move, or alter in any way, any statue located on 
        Federal land related to--
                    (A) the War of 1812;
                    (B) the Civil War; or
                    (C) the Revolutionary War.
                                 <all>
```
Michael HAGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard A. Ross, as Chief Financial Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Richard A. Ross                               
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Richard A. Ross                                      
|                  |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dornoff , Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3022.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to f ormal revision before it is pu blished in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are reques ted to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohi o, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O
. 2020-O HIO -3022
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . D ORNOFF , A PPELLEE . [Until this opinion appears in t he Ohio Official Reports advanc e sheets, it may be cited as State v. Dornoff , Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3022.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Dangler and cause
remanded. (No. 2018-1125―Submitted May 13, 2020―Decided May 26, 2020.)
C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-16-072, 2018-Ohio-3084

_________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and this caus e is
remanded to the cour t of appeals for application of State v. Dangler , __ Ohio St.3d __, 2020-Ohio-2765, __ N.E.3d __.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and K ENNEDY , F RENCH , F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , and S TEWART , JJ., concur.

_________________S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney , for appellant, s tate of Ohio.

_________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28,1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           3,315
<SECURITIES>                                       648
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,624
<PP&E>                                         161,698<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,098
<BONDS>                                         47,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,883
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,701
<SALES>                                        155,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,777
<CGS>                                           57,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,391
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<FN>
<F1>ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
BOCA VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and Pointe Management Group, Inc., Appellants, v. Lourenco Oliveira FARIA, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1934

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 3, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■ ■

★

■ ■

■

■

●★

●

★

●

●

●

●
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15

- 1159 Filed June 29, 2016
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs. AKEEN ELIJAH PORTE , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, James B. Malloy, District Associate Judge.

Akeen Port e appeals his guilty plea and sentence to operating while intoxicated, third of fense, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.

Shawn Smith of Shawn Smith, Attorney at Law, P.L.L.C. , Ames , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Kelli A. Huser and Kevin R. Cmelik , Assistant Attorney s General, for appellee.

Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Mullins and McDonald, JJ.2

MULLINS, Judge. Akeen Porte pled guilty to operating while intoxicated, third offense, and was sentenced. He has appealed, arguing two brief points: (1) trial coun sel was ineffective in failing to file a motion in arrest of judgment, claiming his plea was not knowing and voluntary and (2) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to inform Porte of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. The first issue hin ges on resolution of the s econd issue because his knowing

- and

- voluntary claim is that he was not adequately informed of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. Counsel is required to advise a criminal defendant client “whether his [or her] plea c arries a risk of deportation.” Padilla v. Kentucky

, 559 U.S. 356, 374 (2010). When an attorney fails to do so, counsel breaches an essential duty. Id. at 370

- 71; see also Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687

- 91 (1984). In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Porte must also show he was prejudiced. Padilla , 559 U.S. at 374. On the record before us , we cannot determine what advice or counsel Porte’s attorney gave him. So, we canno t determine whether counsel breached a duty and , if so, whether Porte was prejudiced. Accordingly, we affirm Porte’s conviction and preserve his ineffective

- assistance

- of

- counsel claims for postconviction relief.
AFFIRMED.
----

hib

|   | 1. | The      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy IT      Solutions, Inc. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      7, 2008 |                                      |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                  | /s/ Keith R. Coogan                       |
|                  | Keith      R. Coogan                      |
|                  | Chief      Executive Officer andPresident |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1557 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1557

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain credits 
                        related to solar energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2021

  Mr. Crist introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend certain credits 
                        related to solar energy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sunshine Forever Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SOLAR ENERGY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 48(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 2024'' and inserting 
``January 1, 2035''.
    (b) Repeal of Phaseout.--Section 48(a) of such Code is amended by 
striking paragraph (6).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property the construction of which begins after December 31, 
2020.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF CREDITS WITH RESPECT TO QUALIFIED SOLAR ELECTRIC 
              PROPERTY AND QUALIFIED SOLAR WATER HEATING PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 25D(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``(December 31, 2034, in the case of any 
qualified solar electric property expenditures and qualified solar 
water heating property expenditures)'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Phaseout Not Applicable.--Section 25D(g) of such Code is 
amended by inserting ``in the case of any expenditure other than any 
qualified solar electric property expenditure or qualified solar water 
heating property expenditure,'' after ``For purposes of subsection 
(a),''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of CFWH



|                                             |  |                                              
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organization
|NY Hyperbaric, LLC                           |  | New York                                     
|Forest Hills Hyperbaric, LLC                 |  | New York                                     
|Scranton Hyperbaric LLC                      |  | Pennsylvania                                 
|JFK Hyperbaric LLC                           |  | New Jersey                                   
|Trenton Hyperbaric, LLC                      |  | New Jersey                                   
|Newark BI LLC                                |  | New Jersey                                   
|Passaic Hyperbaric, LLC                      |  | New Jersey                                   
|St Josephs Hyperbaric LLC                    |  | New York                                     
|Greater Bronx Hyperbaric LLC                 |  | New York                                     
|Elise King, LLC                              |  | New York                                     
|South Nassau Hyperbaric, LLC                 |  | New York                                     
|New York Hyperbaric & Wound Care Centers LLC |  | New York                                     
|New York Hyperbaric & Wound Care Centers LLC |  | Delaware                                     
|VB Hyperbaric, LLC                           |  | New York                                     
|Maimonides Hyperbaric, LLC                   |  | New York                                     
|The Square Hyperbaric, LLC                   |  | New York                                     
|South N Hyperbaric LLC                       |  | New York                                     
|Muhlenberg Hyperbaric LLC                    |  | New Jersey                                   
|Lowell Hyperbaric LLC                        |  | Massachusetts                                
|Center for Wound Healing, LLC                |  | New York                                     
|New Jersey Hyperbaric, LLC                   |  | New Jersey                                   
|Far Rockaway Hyperbaric, LLC                 |  | New York                                     
|Atlantic Hyperbaric, LLC                     |  | New York                                     
|Atlantic Associates, LLC                     |  | New Jersey                                   
|CEF Products, LLC                            |  | New York                                     
|CMC Hyperbaric, LLC                          |  | Pennsylvania                                 
|Raritan Bay, LLC                             |  | New Jersey                                   
|South Ocean County Hyperbaric, LLC           |  | New Jersey