alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1432 

To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2021 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mrs. HAYES, Ms. NORTON, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. CARSON, Ms. MENG, and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Susan Harwood Train5 ing Grant Program Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUSAN HARWOOD TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM AU7 THORIZED. 

8 Section 21 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 

9 of 1970 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (c) to read as follows: 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1432 IH

1 ‘‘(c) The Secretary, in consultation with the Sec2 retary of Health and Human Services, shall (1) provide 

3 for the establishment and supervision of programs for the 

4 education and training of employers and employees in the 

5 recognition, avoidance, and prevention of unsafe or 

6 unhealthful working conditions and in employee rights and 

7 employer responsibilities under this Act and (2) consult 

8 with and advise employers and employees, and organiza9 tions representing employers and employees as to effective 

10 means of preventing occupational injuries and illnesses.’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(e) The Secretary shall create a program known as 

14 the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program to competi15 tively award grants to nonprofit organizations, employer 

16 associations, labor unions, and institutions of higher edu17 cation supported by State and local governments to pro18 vide training and education programs for employers and 

19 workers on the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of 

20 safety and health hazards in workplaces and to inform 

21 workers of their rights and employers of their responsibil22 ities under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (in23 cluding grants to develop or expand the capacity of such 

24 organizations to provide safety and health training, edu25 cation, and related assistance to the targeted audiences, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1432 IH

1 grants for the training of employees and employers on oc2 cupational safety and health hazards of particular concern 

3 or for particular industries, or groups of workers at high 

4 risk of injury, illness, or exposure to hazards, and grants 

5 for the development of training materials on particular 

6 topics).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 21 **

** **

**Consent of Patrice Live**

 

I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-Fof New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connectionwith, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report Feasibility Studyof the Rainy River Project, Ontario, Canada”, dated February 14, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New GoldInc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2014, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in theregistration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc.

  

Dated this 27th day of March, 2015

 

 

*/s/ Patrice Live	*

Name: 	Patrice Live

Title: 	Project Manager
### EXHIBIT 99.1



### Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William N. Hagler, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Intermountain Refining Co., Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Intermountain Refining Co., Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.

Date:   May 22, 2007/s/ William N.
HaglerWilliam N.
HaglerPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                     PAGE 1 OF 1


                        THE BISYS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                           
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                              September 30,
                                                           ------------------

PRIMARY                                                       1997      1996
                                                            -------   -------

Net earnings attributable to common stock                   $ 1,623   $ 7,666
                                                            =======   =======

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                                 26,104    24,846

Common shares issuable under stock option
 plans                                                        3,998     3,283

Less shares assumed repurchased with proceeds                (2,667)   (1,788)
                                                            -------   -------

Weighted average common and common 
 equivalent shares outstanding                               27,435    26,341
                                                            =======   =======

Net earnings per common share                               $  0.06   $  0.29
                                                            =======   =======


FULLY - DILUTED

Net earnings attributable to common stock                   $ 1,623   $ 7,666
                                                            =======   =======

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                                 26,104    24,846

Common shares issuable under stock option
 plans                                                        3,998     3,283

Less shares assumed repurchased with proceeds                (2,667)   (1,717)
                                                            -------   -------

Weighted average common and common 
 equivalent shares outstanding                               27,435    26,412
                                                            =======   =======

Net earnings per common share                               $  0.06   $  0.29
                                                            =======   =======


                                          14
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 1, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1550

Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-261-A-K & 14-277-A-K

________________

Glenn Steven Hanes,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Wayne M. Miller,

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public

Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Glen Steven Hanes appeals from a final judgment of conviction and sentence

following a negotiated written plea agreement. Hanes argues that because the plea

colloquy was not thorough, the plea is involuntary. 
Generally, to obtain appellate review of a plea of guilty or no contest,

the defendant must specifically reserve dispositive issues for appeal or

file a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court. Burns v. State,

884 So. 2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Following a guilty or no

contest plea, a defendant may appeal only the trial court's lack of

subject matter jurisdiction; a violation of a plea agreement, if

preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; an involuntary plea, if

preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; and a sentencing error, if

preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.

2d 514, 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

... An issue relating to the voluntary and intelligent nature of the plea

falls within the limited class of issues which a defendant may raise on

appeal from a guilty or no contest plea without having specifically

reserved the right to do so. Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898, 902

(Fla. 1979); Burns, 884 So. 2d at 1013. However, before raising such

an issue on appeal, the defendant must first file a motion to withdraw

the plea with the trial court.

Garcia-Manriquez v. State, 146 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (quoting Hicks v.

State, 915 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140. 

Hanes concedes that he did not timely file a motion to withdraw the plea. As such,

we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We therefore dismiss without

prejudice for Hanes to pursue appropriate post-conviction remedies. 

2
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Stephen E. Hare, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Office Depot, Inc.; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen E. Hare
|Name:               |  | Stephen E. Hare                                     
|Title:              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | April 22, 2016
#### Jerry A. BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. HARRIS, Lieutenant, All being sued in their Individual Capacities; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-56506

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*798Submitted January 18, 2017 *

Filed January 26, 2017

Jerry A. Burton, Pro Se

Andrew M. Gibson, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, Kevin Allen Voth, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appel-lees

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Jerry A. Burton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process violations relating to his gang validation and placement in the secured housing unit (“SHU”) for an indefinite term. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on the basis of claim preclusion. *Holcombe v. Hosmer,*477 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Burton’s action as barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion because the parties or their privies have already litigated Burton’s claims in California state court. *See Furnace v.*Giurbino, 838 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2016) (California habeas petition had claim preclusive effect on subsequent civil litigation because both actions challenged plaintiffs gang validation and SHU placement); *Gonzales v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr.,*739 F.3d 1226, 1231 (9th Cir. 2014) (reasoned denials of California habeas petitions have claim preclusive effect).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Defendants’ request for judicial notice, filed on August 10,2016, is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3RD QTR. 10Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,702
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,370
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (250)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,574
<PP&E>                                           2,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,838)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,351
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,450
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,688
<SALES>                                            250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,633
<CGS>                                                4
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Valassis Communications, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge and belief that:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert L. Recchia  
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Robert L. Recchia      
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02751]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 28, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 735 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-38, CP2022-
45.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-02751 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1203 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1203

To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan 
                               of Action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 22, 2021

Mrs. McClain (for herself, Ms. Herrell, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Crawford, Mr. 
    Lamborn, and Mr. Carl) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To limit the United States from rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan 
                               of Action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Iran Nuclear Verification Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES FROM REJOINING THE JOINT 
              COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
United States may not become a party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 
Action or to any other agreement with Iran relating to the nuclear 
program of Iran until the President certifies to Congress that nuclear 
inspectors of the United Nations--
            (1) are allowed full access to all of Iran's nuclear 
        facilities; and
            (2) have completed their comprehensive report relating to 
        Iran's nuclear facilities.
    (b) Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action'' means the Joint 
Comprehensive Plan of Action signed at Vienna on July 14, 2015, by Iran 
and by France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the People's Republic 
of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and all 
implementing materials and agreements related to the Joint 
Comprehensive Plan of Action.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1524 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1524

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2021

     Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Horsford, and Mrs. Lee of Nevada) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``high-level radioactive waste'', 
``repository'', ``Secretary'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of 
general local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 
2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT-BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund established under section 302(c) of the Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c)) for the costs of the 
activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of 
that Act (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into an 
agreement for a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement for a repository under 
this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```