alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.10









Exhibit C


List of Spok Holdings, Inc., Participants (as of January 1, 2016)
2016 - 2018 Performance Period
	
		
	Name
	Title

	Executives
	 

	KELLY, VINCE
	CEO*

	GOEL, HEMANT
	President

	ENDSLEY, SHAWN
	CFO

	SAINE, THOMAS
	CIO

	CULP, BONNIE
	EVP, Human Resources

	TBH
	EVP, Sales

	BROGAN, DANIELLE
	Controller

	WOODS, SHARON
	Corp Secretary/Treasurer

	 
	 

	Senior Vice Presidents

	SCOTT, DONNA
	SVP, Marketing

	 
	 

	Division Vice Presidents
	 

	Robinson, Donna
	DVP, Sales West

	MIKE KENDZIERSKI
	DVP, Sales East

	 
	 

	Vice Presidents
	 

	OLSON-STEPP, TERRI
	VP, Professional Services

	LING, MICHAEL
	VP, Maintenance Business

	VELDBOOM, KATHY
	VP, Technical Support

	EDDS, BRIAN
	VP, Product Strategy

	GUNDERSON, KYLE
	VP, Development

	 
	 

	Other Key Management
	 

	WAX, JONATHAN
	Regional Vice President, East

	STEIN, JAMES
	Regional Vice President, West

	BOEHLY, BRET
	Regional Vice President, Sales

	JORDAN, JOHN
	Regional Vice President, Sales - APAC

	DITTMER, GARY
	Sr. Tax Director




*The Chief Executive Officer and the President participate in the Plan pursuant to their respective employment agreements.


	
			
	 
	 
	 
















Exhibit D


Performance Goals


2016-2018 Performance Period
CORRECTED BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00329-CV

Michael E. Geiger

v.

Paul A. Hampel

(NO. 2013-CI-13615 IN 407TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $152.00

$195.00 UNKNOWN

INDIGENT N/A COST BILL

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCE

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this October 13, 2015

.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_ ____________________________ Luz Estrada

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53219
EX PARTE Deangelo Jarrod HUDSON

1160156 (CR-15-0873)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

Cert. denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,811,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,799,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,339,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,188,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,915,512
<PP&E>                                      42,801,522
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,499,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              53,633,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,116,414
<BONDS>                                      9,989,461
<COMMON>                                       146,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,639,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                53,633,856
<SALES>                                     43,855,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,855,014
<CGS>                                       31,679,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,984,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,616,427<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,213,808
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,850,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,810,036)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,901,000<F2>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (24,711,036)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (25,640,507)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.44)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES A ONE-TIME, NON-CASH CHARGE OF $8.6 MILLION FOR THE RECORDING OF
PURCHASE OF IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
COMPANY'S ACQUISITION OF HALLMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
<F2>THE $3.9 MILLION OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE WAS RECORDED TO RESTORE FULLY THE
VALUATION ALLOWANCE ON THE COMPANY'S DEFERRED TAX ASSETS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SFAS 109.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned,  John D. White, Chief Financial Officer of Lone Star Steakhouse
& Saloon, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 21, 2006 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ John D. White
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     John D. White
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 1, 2006
```
Ronald Edward BREGE, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
Exhibit 10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 JER INVESTORS TRUST INC. 
 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 
 (MANAGER ONLY) 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 to the JER Investors Trust Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option and
Incentive Award Plan (Manager Only) (the “Plan”) is made effective as of December 16, 2008. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, JER Investors Trust Inc. (the “Company”) adopted that Plan on May 30, 2007; 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined that the Plan should be amended to ensure that it and awards granted thereunder are exempt from, or comply with,
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The Plan is amended by inserting the following as a new Section 10.6: 

 10.6 Section 409A. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, to the extent that any Award would be subject to
Section 409A, no such Award may be granted if it would fail to comply with the requirements set forth in Section 409A. To the extent that the Committee determines that the Plan or any Award is subject to Section 409A and fails to
comply with the requirements of Section 409A, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan or in any Award Agreement, the Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan and/or amend, restructure, terminate or
replace the Award, without the consent of the Participant, to cause the Award to either not be subject to Section 409A or to comply with applicable provisions of such section. In addition, for each Award subject to Section 409A, a
termination of employment or service with the Company shall be deemed to have occurred under the Plan with respect to such Award on the first day on which the Participant has experienced a “separation from service” within the meaning of
Section 409A. 
 Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 (signature page follows) 







 IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, the authorized representative of the Company has executed this Amendment No. 1
to the Plan, effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

					
	JER INVESTORS TRUST INC.
		
	 By:
	 	/s/ Mark S. Weiss
		 	 Name: 
	 	 Mark S. Weiss

		 	 Title:
	 	 President
Marcus Lee BLACK, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4430

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mandamus is dismissed.
H. R. 6062 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To restore the ability of the people of American Samoa to approve amendments 

to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a democratic act of 

self-determination, as authorized pursuant to an Act of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the territory to the President, and to the 

Secretary of the Interior under Executive Order 10264, dated June 29, 1951, 

under which the Constitution of American Samoa was approved and may be 

amended without requirement for further congressional action, subject to the 

authority of Congress under the Territorial Clause in article IV, section 3, clause 

2 of the United States Constitution. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON AMENDMENTS TO OR 

MODIFICATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF AMERICAN 

SAMOA. 

Section 12 of Public Law 98–213 (48 U.S.C. 1662a) is repealed. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6100 

To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, including the registration 

requirements of the Military Selective Service Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2023 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, including the 

registration requirements of the Military Selective Service 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Selective Serv5 ice Repeal Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—The Military Selective Service Act (50 

8 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) is repealed. 

9 (b) TRANSFERS IN CONNECTION WITH REPEAL.— 

10 Notwithstanding the proviso in section 10(a)(4) of the 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6100 IH

1 Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3809(a)(4)), the 

2 Office of Selective Service Records shall not be reestab3 lished upon the repeal of the Act. Not later than 180 days 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the assets, 

5 contracts, property, and records held by the Selective 

6 Service System, and the unexpended balances of any ap7 propriations available to the Selective Service System, 

8 shall be transferred to the Administrator of General Serv9 ices upon the repeal of the Act. The Director of the Office 

10 of Personnel Management shall assist officers and employ11 ees of the Selective Service System to transfer to other 

12 positions in the executive branch. 

13 (c) EFFECT ON EXISTING SANCTIONS.—Notwith14 standing any other provision of law, a person may not be 

15 denied a right, privilege, benefit, or employment position 

16 under Federal law on the grounds that the person, before 

17 the repeal of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 

18 3801 et seq.) by subsection (a), failed to present himself 

19 for and submit to registration under section 3 of such Act 

20 (50 U.S.C. 3802). 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Gerald D. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Frank B. BISHOP, Jr.; F.S.C. II Larry D. Hanlin; Supervisor; Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-6423

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 30, 2017

Decided: September 22, 2017

Gerald D. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. An-kush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Fuller v. Bishop,*No. 1:15-cv-02524-WMN, 2017 WL 386536 (D. Md. Jan. 27 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### M.S., a minor, BY AND THROUGH her Guardian Ad Litem Peggy SARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a Local Education Agency, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-56283

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 6, 2017 Pasadena, California

Filed February 23, 2017

*544Tania L. Whiteleather, Attorney, Law Offices of Tania. L. Whiteleather, Lakewood, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Jonathan Patrick Read, Esquire, Attorney, Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost, LLP, San Marcos, CA, Tiffany Marie Santos, Esquire, Attorney, Fagen Friedman *&*Fulfrost, Carlsbad, CA, Cynthia Denice Vargas, Esquire, Fagen Friedman <& Fulf-rost, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: KLEINFELD, IKUTA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Lake Elsinore Unified School District (Lake Elsinore) appeals the district court’s order granting reimbursement to M.S. under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). *See*20 U.S.C. §§ WOO-1419. The district court had jurisdiction under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Lake Elsinore had no duty under 20 U.S.C. § 1414(a)(2) to conduct a reevaluation of M.S. because the local educational agency did not determine that reevaluation was necessary, M.S.’s parents did not request a reevaluation (as M.S. concedes), M.S.’s teacher did not request a reevaluation, and fewer than three years had elapsed since Dr. Patterson’s evaluation. Accordingly, the district court erred in holding that Lake Elsinore had a duty to reevaluate M.S. and procedurally violated the IDEA by failing to do so.

The district court erred in holding sua sponte that Lake Elsinore violated the IDEA by holding an individualized education program meeting without M.S.’s parents, because M.S. failed to exhaust this claim at the administrative level. *Payne v. Peninsula Sch. Dist.,*653 F.3d 863, 871 (9th Cir. 2011), *overruled on other grounds by Albino v. Baca,*747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc); *J.W. ex rel. J.E.W. v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist.,*626 F.3d 431, 451 (9th Cir. 2010), *aff'g and adopting by reference,*611 F.Supp.2d 1097 (E.D. Cal. 2009).

Because M.S. failed to establish that Lake Elsinore violated the IDEA, M.S.’s parents are not entitled to reimbursement. *See Florence Cty. Sch. Dist. Four v. Carter,*510 U.S. 7, 15, 114 S.Ct. 361, 126 L.Ed.2d 284 (1993).

REVERSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three month period ending March 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                    7,901,000
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                             4,717,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                   59,764,000
<DEPRECIATION>                         (12,155,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           61,888,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                8,320,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             61,888,000
<SALES>                                   3,155,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          3,155,000
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          2,444,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,215,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (486,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (486,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              (486,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (1,618.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (1,618.52)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

RAE
Systems Inc.
Sunnyvale, California

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113437 and 333-109840) and
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-105368, 333-88684, 333-85720, and 333-32678) of RAE Systems Inc. our report dated January 23, 2004,
except for Note 15 as to which the date is January 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of RAE Systems Inc., which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

BDO
Seidman, LLP
San Jose, California
March 22, 2004

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Rentrak Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Paul A. Rosenbaum, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Paul A. Rosenbaum                                                
|    |  | Paul A. Rosenbaum                                                    
|    |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Rentrak Corporation
|    | 
|    |  | June 13, 2008
Exhibit 4.11.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CHAIRMAN LETTER AGREEMENT





This Amendment No. 1 (“***Amendment***”) to the Chairman Letter Agreement of June 9, 2004 (“***Agreement***”) is entered into as of August 1, 2005 (“***Effective Date***”) between **COMMTOUCH SOFTWARE LTD.** (referred to herein as “Commtouch”), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Israel and **IAN BONNER**(referred to herein as “Chairman”).

**The parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follow**



**1**. The stock option originally issued to Chairman under the Agreement, as described in the section entitled “Stock Options”, is hereby modified to reduce the number of options granted from 1,480,000 shares to 740,000 shares. This modification will have retroactive effect to the date of the original grant, June 16, 2004, as if the original grant had been in the amount of 740,000 shares.



**2**.  Each party voluntarily and irrevocably waives the right to dispute the enforceability of this Amendment based on a claim of lack of consideration.



**3**.  Except to the extent amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as between the parties hereto in accordance therewith. This Amendment, along with those terms of the Agreement not superseded hereby, set forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties relating to the subject matter herein and merge and supersede all prior negotiations, discussions and agreements between them.  No modification of or amendment to this Amendment, or any waiver of any rights under this Amendment, shall be effective unless in writing signed by the party against whom it is to be enforced.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Effective Date by the undersigned being duly authorized.





|COMPANY:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | CONSULTANT:                                                                                                                                         
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Commtouch Software Ltd.
        By:___________________________________
        Print Name:___________________________
        Title:_________________________________
        Address:______________________________
        ______________________________________ | ___________________________________
        Ian Bonner
        Address:______________________________
        ______________________________________