alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FALCON 50/50EX

MAINTENANCE MANUAL

 Effectivity: ALL

Rev. Date: 01/2009

57-607

Page 1/4

"DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data"

NON-DESTRUCTIVE CHECK OF FLAP TRACKS 2 AND 5

Operation Code: 576071

Logistics

1. Refer also to maintenance procedures

-  57-210, 57-230

2. Tools and equipment

-  TOOL BOX

-  Eddy current crack instrument (Hocking phasec 2200)

-  45°-elbowed 6 mhz probe ( 207P6)

3. Ingredients and consumable products

-  Multipurpose (cleaner)

-  MIL-L-6529 (lubricating oil)

4. Miscellaneous

-  Cloths (Local procurement)

5. Access

-  563CB, 574CB, 663CB, 674CB, 810

WARNING: COMPLY WITH ALL SAFETY MEASURES APPLYING TO OPERATIONS PERFORMED ON 

FLAPS. ELECTRICAL AND HYDRAULIC POWER SUPPLIES ARE PROHIBITED DURING 

OPERATIONS ON FLAP TRACKS.

NOTE: This inspection must be performed by an operator with a level II certification for eddy current 

testing as defined by EN 4179 or NAS 410.

General

REF.FIG 1

1. The purpose of this procedure is to check the most heavily loaded flap tracks for absence of damage 

(cracks) (see figure 1, Cross-Sections A and B).

Preliminary Steps

REF.FIG 1

1. Remove flap track fairings (563CB), (574CB), (663CB) and (674CB).

2. Remove the inboard and outboard flaps (refer to procedures 57-230 and 57-210, paragraph "Removal").

3. Use a cloth moistened with cleaner, to clean LH and RH flap tracks 2 and 5.

Check

REF.FIG 1
FALCON 50/50EX

MAINTENANCE MANUAL

 Effectivity: ALL

Rev. Date: 01/2009

57-607

Page 2/4

"DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data"

1. Using an eddy current crack detection instrument (HOCKING PHASEC 2200) and a 45°-elbowed, 6-MHz 

probe (207P6), perform an eddy current inspection of LH and RH flap tracks 2 

and 5 (see ATA 20: procedure 20-701).

The inspected area (L) extends from the rear extremity to the beginning of each track (upper blending 

radiuses).

2. If a crack is detected, contact the manufacturer.

Final Steps

1. Lubricate the flap tracks with a cloth moistened with lubricating oil.

2. Install the inboard and outboard flaps (refer to procedures 57-230 and 57-210, paragraph "Installation").

3. Install flap track fairings (563CB), (574CB), (663CB) and (674CB).
FALCON 50/50EX

MAINTENANCE MANUAL

 Effectivity: ALL

Rev. Date: 01/2009

57-607

Page 3/4

"DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data"
FALCON 50/50EX

MAINTENANCE MANUAL

 Effectivity: ALL

Rev. Date: 01/2009

57-607

Page 4/4

"DASSAULT AVIATION Proprietary Data"

Figure 1 Non-destructive check of flap tracks 2 and 5
Kevin D. KINDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4059

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    309,491
<SECURITIES>                                              736,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                              78,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                43,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,197,308
<PP&E>                                                    408,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                            240,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,384,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     155,596
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   27,422
<OTHER-SE>                                              1,228,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,384,006
<SALES>                                                   104,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          104,497
<CGS>                                                      48,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              94,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (183,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (67,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (67,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W. Brantley,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ LELAND W. BRANTLEY, JR.
|Leland W. Brantley, Jr.    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|                           
|November 15, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 15


August 13, 1998

Catalina Marketing Corporation
11300 9th Street North
St. Petersburg, Florida  33716






Catalina Marketing Corporation:

We are aware that Catalina Marketing Corporation has incorporated, by reference
in its Registration Statement File Nos. 33-46793, 33-77100, 33-82456, 333-07525
and 333-13335, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, which
includes our report dated July 14, 1998, covering the unaudited interim
financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), that report is not considered a part of the
registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared
or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

By: /s/ WILLIAM J. MEURER
    ----------------------------  
    William J. Meurer

NNK
EX PARTE Ricky VARNER

1160300 (CR-15-1120)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ariba, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert M. Calderoni, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James W. Frankola, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT M. CALDERONIRobert M. Calderoni President and Chief Executive Officer




December 8, 2003



/s/    JAMES W. FRANKOLAJames W. Frankola Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




December 8, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wilfredo Camargo, Appellant.

[771 NYS2d 9]

*393Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, • J), rendered January 8, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting testimony that the police recovered what was referred to as a “pocket knife” from defendant after his arrest. The officers’ alleged belief that defendant had a weapon in his waistband was relevant to explain the officers’ conduct during the ensuing escalation of the encounter leading to defendant’s arrest, all of which together served as the basis of the resisting arrest and assault charges *(see People v Milhouse,*246 AD2d 119, 122 [1998]). It was necessary to identify the object recovered from defendant in order to prevent the jury from engaging in speculation and drawing unfair inferences about the officers’ credibility. Moreover, the evidence was not particularly prejudicial, and the court’s thorough and repeated limiting instructions served to dispel any possibility of prejudice to defendant. Concur—Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
### U.S. EPA FACT SHEET

The EPA Redesignates Truckee Meadows to Attainment for the Coarse Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standard November 1 6 , 2015

Summary

 The EPA is approving Nevada’s plan for the Truckee Meadows area, also referred to as the Reno planning area, to maintain the inhalable coarse particulate matter 24

- hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (PM 10 NAAQS). These particles are commonly referred to as PM 10 because they have a diameter of ten micrometers or less.

 The EPA is also approving Nevada ’s request to redesignate Truckee Meadows to attainment for the PM 10 NAAQS.
Background

 Today’s actions represent a significant accomplishment accomplished primarily through the actions of the Washoe County District Board of Health, whose regulations and
p rograms have greatly reduced PM 10

.

 With this action, Nevada is currently meeting all the federal health protective standards for clean air. This is a tremendous milestone and reflects cooperation among the public, businesses, local, state and federal agen cies throughout the State.

 In 2011 The EPA previously determined that Truckee Meadows had attained the PM 10 NAAQS. Complete, quality

- assured, and certified ambient air quality monitoring data for the area shows it has continued to attain the PM 10 NAAQS since that time.

 The EPA is concerned about PM 10 because these particles pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Reducing PM 10 levels is essential because, once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects.

 PM 10 is a complex mixture of extremely small particles and liquid droplets. In the Truckee Meadows area it is predominately comprised of “primary particulates,” such as particles from soil or dust, residential wood burning, and diesel.

Next Steps

 Today’s actions will be published in the Federal Register in approximately two weeks and be effective 30 days after publication.

For More Information:

http://www.ep a.gov/region9/air/actions/nv.html#washoe
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of CytRx Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies
that:





(i) the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 11,
2009                                                                                /s/ JOHN Y.
CALOZ


John Y. Caloz


Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to CytRx Corporation and will be retained by CytRx Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as
part of the Form 10-K.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41160

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELEAZAR MACIAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-137-1

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Eleazar Macias has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1ST QUARTER
10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,343
<SECURITIES>                                     2,558
<RECEIVABLES>                                      755
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (233)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,620
<PP&E>                                           2,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,570)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,543
<OTHER-SE>                                       (150)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,655
<SALES>                                             70
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,404
<CGS>                                                6
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Keith SLOANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3507

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 29, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; G08 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 18, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Video Assisted Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jan Li, M.D., Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-496-3114,                         *lij21@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 4, 2022.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-02787 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ryan Christopher FULTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6948

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 24, 2017

*254Ryan Christopher Fultz, Appellant Pro Se. Kaitlin Courtney Gratton, Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Christopher Fultz seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certifícate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fultz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Joshua Nicholas HEARNS, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-2923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.