alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Brion Umidi, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen Biologics, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and15d — 15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 9, 2007         By:                   /s/ BRION UMIDI    Name:  Brion Umidi    Title:  *Chief Financial Officer*
Corey Joshua ROCKER, DOC# C04890, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1951

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 27, 2018

J. Jervis Wise and Bjorn E. Brunvand of Brunvand Wise, P.A., Clearwater; Michael P. Maddux of Michael P. Maddox, P.A., Tampa; and Jennifer Salter of Michael P. Maddox, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katelyn B. Wright, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Anne F. McDonough, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1997              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                26,757                   26,757
<SECURITIES>                          30,076                   30,076
<RECEIVABLES>                        101,486                  101,486
<ALLOWANCES>                           5,730                    5,730
<INVENTORY>                                0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0                        0
<PP&E>                                     0                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       165,465                  165,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0                        0
<BONDS>                               66,382                   66,382
<COMMON>                                  56                       56
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                0                        0
<OTHER-SE>                            50,254                   50,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         165,465                  165,465
<SALES>                                    0                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       8,263                   22,361
<CGS>                                      0                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         244                      979
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,733                    7,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        3,514                    8,433
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,353                    3,247
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,161                    5,186
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                        0
<CHANGES>                                  0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,161                    5,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .36                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .36                      .87
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                           4,124
<SECURITIES>                                       648
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,575
<PP&E>                                         168,452<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,165
<BONDS>                                         51,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,049
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,196
<SALES>                                        234,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,210
<CGS>                                           86,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61
<FN>
<F1>ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0304. KESHIA HUDSON v. FIFTH BEDFORD-PINE APARTMENTS,

L.P. et al.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following

an adverse ruling, pro se defendant Keshia Hudson filed a petition for review in state

court.The state court ruled against Hudson, who then appealed directly to this Court.

We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a

magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary

review. OCGA§ 5-6-35 (a) (11), (b); Strachan v.Meritor Mtg.Corp.East, 216 Ga.App.

82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). “Compliancewith the discretionary appeals procedure

is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471

SE2d 60) (1996). Hudson’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of

jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 12, 2024

09/12/2024
G.G., The Father, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-0400 4D18-0402

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 11, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
| Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Arrayit Corp.     | Jurisdiction of Organization       | Percentage owned by Parent |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                                | TeleChem International, Inc        | Nevada                     | 100% |
|                                                | Arrayit Marketing, Inc.            | Nevada                     | 100% |
|                                                |                               |                       |   |
| Partially Owned Subsidiaries of Arrayit Corp.  |                               |                       |
|                                                |                               |
|                                                | Arrayit Scientific Solutions, Inc. | Nevada                     | 98% |
|                                                | Avant Diagnostics, Inc.            | Nevada                     | 38.46% |
September 4, 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M - 30 West Building ground floor, Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Request for extension of exemption (Docket Number FAA - 2010 - 1227) SimCo m Training Center is requesting and extension of our Exemption No. 10209 which allows relief from the requirements of 14 CFR Part 91.531 (a)(2); 91.531 (a)(1); 91.9 (a) to the extent necessary

to allow SimCom to train, test, and certificate pilots to fly the Cessna Citation, CE500 series aircraft, Single - Pilot. We assert that the conditions and reasons regarding the public interest and safety made in our original application remain unchanged. If there are an y questions or concerns, or a need for additiona l information, please contact me at (480)905 - 3080. Sincerel y , 

# William C. Gant Bill Gant SimCom Training Center Manager bgant@simulator.com (480)905 - 3040

7 860 East McClain, Suite 1, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260

(480) 905 - 3040 / (800)293 - 3035 ( 480) 951 - 2709 Fax
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,215
<PP&E>                                         173,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,171
<BONDS>                                            286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,610
<SALES>                                        121,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               121,282
<CGS>                                           51,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,244
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,127
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
Yasmany LOPEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Pedro TORRES, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2340

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 29, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION





Exhibit
32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended July 5, 2009 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy IT
      Solutions, Inc.




August
24, 2009


/s/ Christopher C.
FromanChristopher
      C. FromanChief
      Executive Officer and
President




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
steam_record - Re: Tampa Electric Company Polk Power Station Request for Extension 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Young, Kevin A." <kayoung@tecoenergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Young, Kevin A." <kayoung@tecoenergy.com> 

Date: 07/13/2010 04:20PM 

cc: "Kroh, Stanley M." <smkroh@tecoenergy.com> 

Subject: Tampa Electric Company Polk Power Station Request for Extension 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Young, Kevin A." <kayoung@tecoenergy.com>

Date: 7/14/2010 6:15 AM

Subject: Re: Tampa Electric Company Polk Power Station Request for Extension

Attachments: PPS.PDF

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3D5606DO... 2/23/2011
Dear Ms. Alicea, 

 

Please find attached to this email a copy of Tampa Electric Company's request for extension of 

the deadline for response to EPA's Questionnaire for Steam Electric Effluent Guidelines for Polk 

Power Station. Please contact me if you have any questions. 

 

Thank you, 

Kevin Young 

 

 

 

 

NOTICE: This email is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this 

email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. Although 

we take precautions to protect against viruses, we advise you to take your own precautions to protect against viruses as we accept no liability for any 

which remain. 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3D5606DO... 2/23/2011
Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3D5516DO... 8/29/2011
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 23-30 

(Filed: 8 May 2023) 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

*************************************** 

JOHN GAILEY, JR. * 

* 

Plaintiff, * 

* 

v. * 

* 

THE UNITED STATES, * 

* 

Defendant. * 

* 

*************************************** 

ORDER

HOLTE, Judge.

On 5 May 2023, pursuant to Rule 52.2 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims 

(“RCFC”), the parties filed a joint motion for voluntary remand and stay of proceedings. See J.

Mot. for Vol. Remand and Stay of Proceedings, ECF No. 6. In their Motion, the parties state: 

“Without concession of error by the United States and without the United State’s [sic] waiver of 

any defenses or objections to Plaintiff’s claims, the parties have agreed to request that the Court 

remand this case to the [Army Board of Correction of Military Records (‘ABCMR’)] pursuant to 

. . . RCFC 52.2 and stay proceedings before this Court to allow the [ABCMR] to reevaluate 

Plaintiff’s request for a permanent medical retirement.” Id. at 1–2. The parties assert “[a

r]emand serves the Court’s and the parties’ interest in resolving this matter in a just, speedy, and 

inexpensive manner.” Id. at 2 (citing RCFC 1). According to the parties, plaintiff “may receive 

the relief he seeks during the remand with no need for further judicial proceedings.” Id. The 

Court accordingly adopts the parties’ proposed procedure for remand and orders the following: 

(1) The Court GRANTS the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand, ECF No. 6, and 

REMANDS the case to the ABCMR. 

 

(2) The remand period SHALL TERMINATE on 6 November 2023, and the Court 

STAYS all proceedings in this case until that date. See RCFC 52.2(b)(1)(C). If the 

ABCMR has not acted on the remand on or before 6 November 2023, the parties shall 

follow the procedures provided in RCFC 52.2(c). 

 (3) The ABCMR SHALL RECONSIDER fully all claims asserted by plaintiff, 

including any claims for permanent disability retired pay pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1201, 

and any new arguments or evidence he presents regarding his existing claims, in 
- 2 -

accordance with the ABCMR’s applicable procedures and powers, including the 

ABCMR’s power to seek additional advisory opinions. 

(4) The government SHALL FILE a joint status report every 90 days, with the first 

due on 7 August 2023, apprising the Court of the status of the remand proceedings. 

(5) Within 30 days of the ABCMR’s decision, the parties SHALL FILE a joint status 

report advising the Court whether: (1) the remand affords a satisfactory basis for 

disposition of the case; or (2) further proceedings are required and, if so, the nature of 

such proceedings. See RCFC 52.2(e)(1). 

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to serve a certified copy of this Order and the 

complaint, along with a copy of the Court’s docket sheet in this case, to the ABCMR at:

Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) 

251 18th Street South 

Suite 385 

Arlington, VA 22202-3531 

army.arbainquiry@mail.mil

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Ryan T. Holte 

 RYAN T. HOLTE 

 Judge
Terry Edward STETTLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-4752

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 13, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 17, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1552 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Specialist Matthew 

R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself and Mr. LANGEVIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, Rhode Island, 

as the ‘‘Specialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MATTHEW R. TURCOTTE POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 42 Main Street in Slatersville, 

7 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Spe8 cialist Matthew R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1552 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Matthew 

5 R. Turcotte Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS