alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 12-12514

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-20786-UU-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

REGGIE DAVID SANCHEZ, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(June 11, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 12-12514 Date Filed: 06/11/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Manuel Vazquez, appointed counsel for Reggie David Sanchez in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sanchez’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 12-12514 Date Filed: 06/11/2013 Page: 2 of 2
Nos. 04-14-00709-CR 

STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

VS. § FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

FRANCISCO JAVIER GONZALEZ § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

From the 399th District Court of Bexar County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2011-CR-9697 

Hon. Ray J. Olivarri, Judge Presiding 

 In accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), the undersigned submits the following: 

Appellant’s brief is due to be filed on Monday, the 6th of April, 2015. The undersigned 

requests additional time to prepare and file Appellant’s opening brief. Counsel has recently 

received the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, tendered to counsel on March 

31, 2015. Counsel has been working on Appellant’s brief but needs time to incorporate the 

court’s ruling and amend his arguments. Counsel has also been preparing two writs of habeas 

corpus, one in Bexar County and one in Dallas County, which have forced counsel to divert his 

attention from this appeal. Counsel requests an extension of twenty-one (21) days, to and 

including Monday, April 27, 2015. This is Appellant’s third request for an extension. 

Appellant has spoken with the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office regarding 

this motion and, per Chief Appellate Prosecutor RicoValdez, they are not opposed to 

granting this request for an extension of time. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests that this 

Court grant the requested extension. 

ACCEPTED

04-14-00709-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/2/2015 10:38:51 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10:38:51 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

Robert A. Jimenez

De Mott, McChesney, Curtright & Armendariz, LLC.

800 Dolorosa Street, Suite 100

San Antonio, Texas 78207

210/354-1844

210/212-2116 - fax

By: /s/ Robert A. Jimenez

SBN: 24059125
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 24th day of April, 2015 a copy of the foregoing “Motion 

for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Opening Brief” has been electronically filed with this 

Court, and will be served to the Bexar County District Attorney’s Office on April 2, 2015.

 /s/ ROBERT A. JIMENEZ
#### In the Matter of Peter Conroy et al., Respondents, v Smithtown Central School District, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 428]

*493In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated January 7, 2003, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

General Municipal Law § 50-e requires, as a condition precedent to a lawsuit against a municipal corporation, timely service of a notice of claim on the municipal corporation *(see Benzinger v Town of Brookhaven,*288 AD2d 412 [2001]). In deciding whether to permit the service of a late notice of claim, the court generally will consider three factors: (1) whether the movant has a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve a timely notice of claim, (2) whether the municipality or agency acquired actual notice of the essential facts of the claim within 90 days after the claim arose or a reasonable time thereafter, and (3) whether the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality in its defense *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e [1]; *Benzinger v Town of Brookhaven, supra).*

There is no evidence that the Smithtown Central School District acquired actual knowledge of the facts constituting the petitioners’ negligent supervision claim within 90 days or a reasonable time thereafter *(see Matter of Dunlea v Mahopac Cent. School Dist.,*232 AD2d 558 [1996]). The incident report prepared by the mother of the infant petitioner on the day following the accident stated only that, in attempting to lift a chair into an overhead position, while carrying the chair from one classroom to another, the infant petitioner lost control and the chair struck him in the forehead. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Andrew WILLIAMS v. STATE

CR-15-1509

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking
Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leland W. Brantley, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  |  |                                                                  
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | 
| |  |  |  | /S/ Leland W. Brantley, Jr.                                      
| |  |  |  | Leland W. Brantley, Jr. Chief Financial Officer November 16,
2009

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Michael D. Capellas, the Chief
Executive Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Capellas
|                        |  |  |  | Michael D. Capellas    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Lwane MANSELL, a/k/a Lwane A. Mansell, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4131

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, (the Company) on 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Rick Ivanovick Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|March 19, 2004 | /s/ Rick Ivanovick     
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Rick Ivanovick         
|               | Chief Financial Officer
Submitting Written Comments on the Proposed Updates to EPA’s Air Emissions 

Requirements for New Residential Wood Heaters

Thank you for your interest in the Proposed Updates to EPA’s Air Emissions Requirements for 

New Residential Wood Heaters. Please follow the instructions below for submitting written 

comments. The comment deadline is May 5, 2014. 

Please identify all comments with Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734. Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following methods: 

 www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

 E-mail: Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

 Fax: Fax your comments to: (202) 566-9744. 

 Mail: Send your comments to: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 

Washington, DC 20460. 

 Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: EPA Docket Center, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed information. To make special arrangements or 

for questions, call (202) 566-1742.
EX PARTE James Edward PRESSLEY

1160207 (CR-15-0777)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock
Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ZapMe! Corporation of our
report dated January 28, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of ZapMe! Corporation included in this annual report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Walnut Creek, California
March 29, 2000
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.6.1


Amendment Number 1 to the
Eversource Deferred Compensation Plan


Effective February 7, 2018, the Eversource Deferred Compensation Plan is amended as follows:
		
	1.
	The definition of “Eligible Trustee” in Article 2 is hereby amended to remove “an” and add “a non-Employee” and shall read as follows:


““Eligible Trustee” means any person serving as a non-employee Eversource Energy Trustee for a particular Plan Year.”
		
	2.
	Article 4.5 (A) is hereby amended to add the percentage amount of any annual Equity Award granted to be automatically deferred and shall read as follows:


“(A) Trustee Equity Award. An Eligible Trustee automatically shall be deemed to elect deferral of fifty percent of any annual Equity Award granted as part of the retainer for Board service for any Plan Year, and may, subject to such rules as the Trustees may adopt from time to time, elect to defer or not defer part or all of the remaining fifty percent of such annual  Equity Award.”


		
	3.
	Article 4.6 (B) is hereby amended to add reference to Equity with respect to deferral elections and shall read as follows:


“(B) Trustee Participants. A Trustee Participant’s Cash and Equity Award Deferral elections for a Particular Year shall terminate as to further deferrals for such Plan Year if such Participant (i) becomes Disabled during such Plan Year, or (ii) receives an Emergency Benefit under the Plan during such Plan Year.”


		
	4.
	Article 6.2 (A) is hereby amended to clarify the distribution time of a properly deferred Trustee Participant Equity Award and shall read as follows:


“(A) Affirmative Elections by Participants. All distributions from all Employee Participant Accounts and Trustee Participant Cash Retainer Deferral Accounts hereunder shall be made within 60 days of the Participant’s End Termination Date unless other permitted by the Plan Administrator and properly elected in the Participant’s Enrollment Agreement.  Distributions from Trustee Participant Equity Deferral Accounts shall be made on the tenth day of January in the year following the Trustee’s Termination Date unless otherwise permitted by the Plan Administrator and properly elected in the Trustee Participant’s Enrollment Agreement.  No Enrollment Agreement shall elect a distribution date sooner than 3 years after the Plan Year for which the deferral is to occur (or earlier termination of Service).”


		
	5.
	Article 6.2 (B) is hereby deleted in its entirety and Article 6.2 (C) is renamed Article 6.2 (B).


6.Article 7.2 is hereby amended by deleting the words “within 90 days” and substituting therein “at the election of the Participant’s beneficiary, but in no event later than December 31 of the year following the Participant’s death”.
EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY




_________________________________________
Christine M. Carmody
Executive Vice President - Human Resources and 
  Information Technology
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, David S. Lee, Chief
Executive Officer of Registrant , certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 30, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID S. LEE    
|                       |  |  |  | David S. Lee           
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of eOn Communications Corporation
(Registrant) I, Stephen R. Bowling, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant.



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Date: October 30, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    STEPHEN R.
BOWLING
|                       |  |  |  | Stephen R. Bowling       
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Alexandria SHIKAR, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 2, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
July 30 , 2015

Mr

. S tephen Denty

8810 Leeshire Lane

Raleigh, NC 27615

Dear Mr. Denty :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains wh y we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 1 2 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1507 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close th e docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Rashard HARVEY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2114

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

SEPTEMBER 27, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1540 

To provide for joint reports by relevant Federal agencies to Congress 

regarding incidents of terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2021 

Mr. AGUILAR (for himself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. PAYNE, Miss RICE

of New York, Mrs. LURIA, Mr. CORREA, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mrs. 

FLETCHER, Mr. LIEU, Mr. PANETTA, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. 

VARGAS, Mr. MOULTON, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. KILMER, Mr. 

RYAN, Mr. CARSON, Mr. COOPER, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. KAHELE, 

Ms. MENG, Mr. LANGEVIN, and Ms. SCANLON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To provide for joint reports by relevant Federal agencies 

to Congress regarding incidents of terrorism, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reporting Efficiently 

5 to Proper Officials in Response to Terrorism Act of 2021’’ 

6 or the ‘‘REPORT Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1540 IH

1 SEC. 2. DUTY TO REPORT. 

2 (a) DUTY IMPOSED.—Whenever an incident of ter3 rorism occurs in the United States, it shall be the duty 

4 of the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination 

5 with the Attorney General and the Director of the Federal 

6 Bureau of Investigation, to submit to Congress, not later 

7 than upon completion of the investigation relating to such 

8 incident by the primary United States Government agency 

9 conducting such investigation, an unclassified report 

10 (which may be accompanied by a classified annex) con11 cerning such incident. 

12 (b) CONTENT OF REPORTS.—A report under this sec13 tion shall contain— 

14 (1) a statement of the facts of the incident of 

15 terrorism that is the subject of such report, as 

16 known at the time of such report; and 

17 (2) any recommendations for changes in prac18 tices or law, consistent with the Constitution, with 

19 particular attention to changes that could help pre20 vent future incidents of terrorism. 

21 (c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘incident 

22 of terrorism’’ means an event declared by the Federal Bu23 reau of Investigation to be an act of terrorism. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Walter J. O'CONNOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2075

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10(r)


CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation




The following is a summary of compensation paid to the non-employee directors of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) effective April 26, 2018. For additional information regarding the compensation of the non-employee directors, please read the definitive proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.


		
	•
	Annual retainer fee of $100,000 for Board membership, paid quarterly in arrears;




		
	•
	Supplemental annual retainer of $20,000 for serving as a chairman of the Audit Committee or Compensation Committee; and




		
	•
	Supplemental annual retainer of $15,000 for serving as a chairman of the Finance Committee or Governance Committee.




Stock Grants. Each non-employee director serving as of May 1, 2018 was granted an annual stock award under the CenterPoint Energy Inc. Stock Plan for Outside Directors in 2018.  The cash value of these awards, as of the grant date, is set annually by the Board of Directors of the Company.  The number of shares awarded is then determined by dividing the cash value by the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date.  In 2018, the Board determined a cash value for the stock award, as of the grant date, of $130,000, resulting in a stock award to each non-employee director of 5,110 shares of common stock. The annual stock award granted in 2018 and any future stock awards under the Stock Plan for Outside Directors are immediately fully vested upon grant.


Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may elect each year to defer all or part of their annual retainer fees, including any committee chairman fees and meeting fees. Directors participating in these plans may elect to receive distributions of their deferred compensation and interest in three ways: (i) an early distribution of either 50% or 100% of their deferrals for the year in any year that is at least four years from the year of deferral or, if earlier, the year in which they attain their normal retirement date under the plan (the first day of the month coincident with or next following attainment of age 70); (ii) a lump sum distribution payable in the year after they reach their normal retirement date or leave the Board of Directors, whichever is later; or (iii) 15 annual installments beginning on the first of the month coincident with or next following their normal retirement date or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later.