alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3(i)b

                          CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                      CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES CORPORATION

Robert V. Dickinson and Stephen M. Wurzburg certify that:

1.   They are the president and the secretary, respectively, of California Micro
     Devices Corporation.

2.   The name of the corporation is California Micro Devices Corporation, and it
     is a California corporation.

3.   The instrument being corrected is entitled "CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
     ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA MICRO DEVICES CORPORATION", and the
     instrument was filed with Secretary of State of California on February 25,
     1992.

4.   The second paragraph of Article IV of the Articles of Incorporation as
     contained in Paragraph "2" of said Certificate of Amendment, as corrected,
     should read as follows:

     "The preferred stock may be divided into such number of series as the Board
     of Directors may determine. The Board of Directors is authorized to
     determine and alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions
     granted to and imposed upon the preferred stock or any series thereof with
     respect to any wholly unissued class or series of preferred stock, and to
     fix the number of shares of any series of preferred stock and the
     designation of any such series of preferred stock. The Board of Directors,
     within the limits and restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions
     of the Board of Directors originally fixing the number of shares
     constituting any series, may increase or decrease (but not below the number
     of shares of such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any
     series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series."

5.   That said Paragraph "2", as corrected, conforms the wording of the second
     paragraph of the amended article to that adopted by the Board of Directors
     and shareholders.

We further declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the State of
California that the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct
of our own knowledge.

Date: August 24, 2001

                                                 /s/ Robert V. Dickinson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             ROBERT V. DICKINSON, President

                                                 /s/ Stephen M. Wurzburg
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             STEPHEN M. WURZBURG, Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Trust at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ Alan B. MillerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 14, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# **Exhibit31.1**

# ** **

## **CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I,Norman D. Smith, certify that:

 

1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zamba Corporation;

 

2.   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | August 13, 2003                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Norman D. Smith                   |   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 491

- C V


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JAVIER REYES , A ppellant ,

v.

NERY VALDEZ , A ppellee

.

On appeal from the 3 89 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to supplement the
record and appellant’s sixth and seventh motion s for extension of time to file the brief.
The reporter’s record was filed on December 20, 2018, and a ppellant ’ s brief was originally

due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). T his Court has
previously granted appellant five extensions of time totaling 104 days to file the brief.2

Appellant has advised this Court that she is “ almost done ” completing appellant’s brief
but upon rechecking the appellate record, she has discovered that four hearings were

held but not transcri bed : September 12, 2017, October 18, 2017, November 15, 2017,
and January 22, 2018

. It is unknown whether a record was made of these hearings.
Counsel is requesting one week to file the brief after the supplemental reporter’s record

is filed.

When a re levant item has been omitted from the reporter’s record, the appellate
court may by letter direct the trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate
court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the omitted items. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

34. 6(d) . Accordingly, appellant’s unopposed motion to supplement the reporter’s record

is GRANTED and the appeal is ABATED.

The court reporter of the 3 8 9 th District Court of Hidalgo County is directed to inform
this Court within ten days from the date of this order whether a reporter’s record was
made of hearings held on September 12, 2017, October 18, 2017, November 15, 2017,
and January 22, 2018. If a record was made, the reporter is directed to prepare a supplemental reporter’s record

. The supplemental record , if any, shall be filed with this

Court within 30 days from the date of this order.

Th is appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the supplemental reporter’s record

or upon further order of th is Court. Appellant’s sixth and seventh motion s for extension

of time to file the brief are GRANTED. Appellant is ordered to file the brief seven days

after the date this cause is reinstated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.3 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed th e 10th day of May , 201 9

.
Antwaun SNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3743

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              7
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  216,348,206
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                 221,356,767
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                   221,356,767
<EQUITIES>                              5,172,428
<MORTGAGE>                                 0
<REAL-ESTATE>                              0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                        268,250,851
<CASH>                                    838,548
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                     34,097,408
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                  1,564,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        393,465,437
<POLICY-LOSSES>                        72,718,914
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                    13,685,391
<POLICY-OTHER>                             0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                        67,775,000
<COMMON>                                   89,839
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                            211,072,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          393,465,437
<PREMIUMS>                             97,141,693
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    14,729,566
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                         85,302
<OTHER-INCOME>                          6,417,341
<BENEFITS>                             34,716,270
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>            13,251,070
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                   11,236,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        52,026,622
<INCOME-TAX>                           18,189,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           39,785,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                4.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                4.48
<RESERVE-OPEN>                         81,835,558
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                    43,388,163
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                       5,981,969
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                     16,885,840
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                       41,600,936
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                        72,718,914
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                 5,981,969
        

<PAGE>
# Eiropas Savienības C 182A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 182A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 57. sējums2014. gada 14. jūnijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 182A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

57. sējums2014. gada 14. jūnijs

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Eiropas personāla atlases birojs (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 182A/01 | Paziņojums par atcelšanu | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas personāla atlases birojs (EPSO)

2014/C 182A/01

Paziņojums par atcelšanu

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 182A/02 | Atskaite par Oficiālā Vēstneša C A Sēriju Konkursi | 2 |

2014/C 182A/02

Atskaite par Oficiālā Vēstneša C A Sēriju Konkursi

Oficiālā Vēstneša

2

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas personāla atlases birojs (EPSO)

| 14.6.2014 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 182/1

---

PAZIŅOJUMS PAR ATCELŠANU

2014/C 182 A/01

Atklātie konkursi:

| — | EPSO/AST/127/13 – grieķu valodas (EL) tekstu korektori (AST 3)

  un |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/127/13 – grieķu valodas (EL) tekstu korektori (AST 3)

un

| — | EPSO/AST/128/13 – portugāļu valodas (PT) tekstu korektori (AST 3), |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/128/13 – portugāļu valodas (PT) tekstu korektori (AST 3),

par kuriem publicēts paziņojums Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī
   (1), ir atcelti.

---

(1)  OV C 131 A, 8.5. 2013., 1. lpp.

---

14.6.2014

| 14.6.2014 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 182/2

---

ATSKAITE PAR OFICIĀLĀ VĒSTNEŠA C A SĒRIJU KONKURSI

2014/C 182 A/02

Lūdzu, skatīt sarakstu ar C A sērijas izdevumiem, kas publicēti šā gada laikā.

Ja nav norādīts citādi, Oficiālo Vēstnesi izdod visās valodu versijās.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

---
Robert S. PETERS and Bethanie Peters v. Bruce HALL

1151022

Supreme Court of Alabama.

January 13, 2017

Affirmed.
Michael Anthony COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4787

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Willie M. LIGHTFOOT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3815

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clifford Edward SHIRLEY, Jr., a/k/a Skip, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-4569

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 2, 2017

Decided: May 26, 2017

Timothy Anderson, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clifford Edward Shirley, Jr., pleaded guilty, pursuant to a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, to conspiracy with intent to distribute 280 grams or more of cocaine base and 5 kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846 (2012). The parties agreed to a 120-month term of imprisonment, and the district court sentenced Shirley accordingly. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), questioning whether the record contained sufficient evidence to substantiate the drug weights alleged in the indictment. Shirley has filed a pro se supplemental brief raising the same challenge.

“A defendant who pleads guilty ... admits all of the factual allegations made in the indictment, and waives all non-jurisdictional defects, including the right to contest the factual merits of the charges.” *United States v. Gosselin World Wide Moving, N.V.,*411 F.3d 502, 515 (4th Cir. 2005) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, by pleading guilty, Shirley waived his right to challenge the sufficiency of the drug weight evidence. *See United States v. Willis,*992 F.2d 489, 491 (4th Cir. 1993).

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Shirley’s conviction, and dismiss the appeal from Shirley’s sentence for lack of jurisdiction. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), (c)(1) (2012); *United States v. Williams,*811 F.3d 621, 623, 625 (4th Cir. 2016). This court requires that counsel inform Shirley, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Shirley requests that a petition be filed, but *126counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Shirley.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART*
Cedric SHEFFIELD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1359

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 11, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0               8,495,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0               2,277,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0               4,250,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                  98,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0               5,743,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              21,162,000
<PP&E>                                               0              30,808,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0               8,241,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0              45,846,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0               2,706,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                 112,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              40,647,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0              45,846,000
<SALES>                                      6,539,000              19,811,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,539,000              19,811,000
<CGS>                                        4,535,000              13,696,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,535,000              13,696,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,919,000               6,637,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,000                 183,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                217,000               (107,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            217,000               (107,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,000               (107,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                    (.01)


</TABLE>
thrm-ex101_14.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Gentherm incorporated

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Non-employee directors of the Board receive a mix of cash and share-based compensation. Directors who are employees or officers of the Corporation do not receive any additional compensation for Board service. Cash compensation is paid in advance at the annual meeting of shareholders.

The compensation described herein will have effect starting with the 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.

In addition to reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, including those incurred in attending Board and committee meetings, non-employee directors receive the following: 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $75,000 ($115,000 for the Chairman of the Board and $80,000 for the Lead Independent Director, if one exists); 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $5,000 ($10,000 for the committee chair) for Compensation, Technology, and Corporate Governance Committee members;




 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
an annual fee of $5,000 ($15,000 for the committee chair) for Audit Committee members;

	
 
	
•
	
 
	
an annual fee of $1,000 ($5,000 for the committee chair) for Nominating Committee members; and 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
$100,000 in restricted stock granted as of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders; such restricted stock vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the applicable director’s continued service or retirement (all as under the terms of the Corporation’s then-applicable incentive equity plan).
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference (A) in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-120313, 333-43138, 33-61907, 33-10257, 333-44959, 333-61833, 333-69268, 333-90919, 333-88250, 333-102199, and333-108443) pertaining to the 1981 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1987 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, 2004Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, CEO Option Program, VP Sales Option Program and VP Finance & Administration and CFO Option Program of California Micro Devices Corporation and (B) in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113695,333-108417, 333-102198, and 333-76206) of our report dated May 8, 2003 (except for the second paragraph of Note 9, as to which the date is June 26, 2003) with respect to the 2003 financial statements and schedule of California Micro DevicesCorporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

June 14, 2005