6504 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 

Successor-In-Interest Determination, and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2020, 86 FR 

74066 (December 29, 2021) (Final Results). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum 

Sheet from the People’s Republic of China, 2018– 

2020: Final Results Disclosure,’’ dated December 

27, 2021. 

3The domestic industry is the Aluminum 

Association Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade 

Enforcement Working Group and its individual 

members. 

4See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘1st 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order 

on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the 

People’s Republic of China—Domestic Industry’s 

Comments Identifying a Ministerial Error in Final 

Results,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on Common Alloy 

Aluminum Sheet from the People’s Republic of 

China: Ministerial Error Allegation in the Final 

Results,’’ dated concurrently with this notice 

(Ministerial Error Memorandum). 

Mill & Timber Products Ltd. 

Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. 

Mirax Lumber Products Ltd. 

Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. 

Monterra Lumber Mills Limited 

Morwood Forest Products Inc. 

Multicedre ltee 

Nakina Lumber Inc. 

National Forest Products Ltd. 

Nicholson and Cates Ltd 

Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership 

North American Forest Products Ltd. (located 

in Abbotsford, British Columbia) 

North Enderby Timber Ltd. 

Northland Forest Products Ltd. 

Olympic Industries, Inc./Olympic Industries 

Inc-Reman Code/Olympic Industries ULC/ 

Olympic Industries ULC-Reman/Olympic 

Industries ULC-Reman Code 

Oregon Canadian Forest Products Inc. dba 

Oregon Canadian Forest Products 

Pacific Coast Cedar Products, Ltd. 

Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc. 

Pacific Pallet, Ltd. 

Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd. 

PalletSource Inc. 

Parallel Wood Products Ltd. 

Pat Power Forest Products Corporation 

Phoenix Forest Products Inc. 

Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd. 

Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. 

Portbec Forest Products Ltd (aka Les Produits 

Forestiers Portbec Ltee) 

Power Wood Corp. 

Precision Cedar Products Corp. 

Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora 

Forest Products) 

Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc. 

Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. (aka Temrex 

Forest Products LP) 

Produits Matra Inc. and Sechoirs de Beauce 

Inc. 

Promobois G.D.S. inc. 

Rayonier A.M. Canada GP 

Rembos Inc. 

Rene Bernard Inc. 

Rick Dubois 

Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. 

River City Remanufacturing Inc. 

S&R Sawmills Ltd 

S&W Forest Products Ltd. 

San Industries Ltd. 

Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. 

Scierie St-Michel inc. 

Scierie West Brome Inc. 

Scott Lumber Sales 

Shakertown Corp. 

Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. 

Silvaris Corporation 

Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. 

Skana Forest Products Ltd. 

Source Forest Products 

South Beach Trading Inc. 

South Coast Reman Ltd. 

South Fraser Container Terminals 

Spruceland Millworks Inc. 

Star Lumber Canada Ltd. 

Sundher Timber Products Inc. 

Surplus G Rioux 

Surrey Cedar Ltd. 

Taan Forest Limited Partnership 

Taiga Building Products Ltd. 

Tall Tree Lumber Company 

Terminal Forest Products Ltd. 

The Wood Source Inc. 

Tolko Industries Ltd. and Tolko Marketing 

and Sales Ltd. 

Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. 

Triad Forest Products Ltd. 

Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 

Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 

Usine Sartigan Inc. 

Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC 

Valley Cedar 2 Inc. 

Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. 

Visscher Lumber Inc 

W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 

Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 

Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 

West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 

Western Forest Products Inc. 

Western Lumber Sales Limited 

Westminster Industries Ltd. 

Weyerhaeuser Co. 

White River Forest Products L.P. 

Winton Homes Ltd. 

Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 

Woodstock Forest Products 

Woodtone Specialties Inc. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02322 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–073] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 2018–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is amending the final 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on common 

alloy aluminum sheet from the People’s 

Republic of China to correct ministerial 

errors. The period of review (POR) is 

June 22, 2018, through January 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Frank Schmitt or Fred Baker, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4880 or (202) 482–2924, 

respectively. 

Background 

On December 27, 2021, Commerce 

disclosed its calculations for the Final 

Results 1 to interested parties.2 On 

January 3, 2022, the domestic industry 3

submitted an allegation of ministerial 

errors in the Final Results.4 No other 

party made an allegation of ministerial 

errors or submitted a reply to the 

domestic industry’s ministerial error 

allegation. 

Legal Framework 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), defines a 

‘‘ministerial error’’ as including ‘‘errors 

in addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical errors 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

unintentional error which the 

administering authority considers 

ministerial.’’ With respect to final 

results of administrative reviews, 19 

CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce 

‘‘will analyze any comments received 

and, if appropriate, correct any 

ministerial error by amending . . . the 

final results of review . . .’’ 

Ministerial Error 

Commerce agrees with the domestic 

industry that Commerce made 

inadvertent, unintentional errors in the 

Final Results within the meaning of 

section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.224(f) with respect to its calculation 

of financial ratios from the financial 

statement of Alcomet A.B. used in the 

calculation of normal value for 

respondent, Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum 

Co., Ltd., Baotou Alcha Aluminum Co., 

Ltd., and Alcha International Holdings 

Limited (collectively, Alcha). 

Accordingly, Commerce determines 

that, in accordance with section 751(h) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), it 

made ministerial errors in the Final 

Results. 

For a complete discussion of the 

ministerial error allegation, as well as 

Commerce’s analysis, see the 

accompanying Ministerial Error 

Memorandum.5 The Ministerial Error 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 6505 

6See Final Results, 86 FR at 74067. 

7For the purposes of this review, we have 

considered the names Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., 

Ltd. and Jiangsu Alcha Aluminium Co., Ltd., as 

equivalent. 

8See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

9 Id. 

10 Id. 

11See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

13See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

19730, 19731 (April 8, 2020) (‘‘All firms listed 

below that wish to qualify for separate rate status 

in the administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as appropriate, either a 

separate rate application or certification, as 

described below.’’). 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), 

Commerce is amending the Final 

Results to reflect the correction of a 

ministerial error in the calculation of 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

assigned to Alcha in the Final Results, 

which changes from 56.93 percent to 

58.61 percent. Furthermore, we are 

revising the dumping margin applicable 

to the company not selected for 

individual examination in this 

administrative review, Yinbang Clad 

Material Co., Ltd. (Yinbang Clad), which 

is based entirely on Alcha’s weightedaverage dumping margin.6

Amended Final Results 

As a result of correcting the 

ministerial errors, Commerce 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period June 22, 2018, through January 

31, 2020: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu Alcha Aluminum Co., 

Ltd.7/Baotou Alcha Aluminum 

Co., Ltd./Alcha International 

Holdings Limited ..................... 58.61 

Yinbang Clad Material Co., Ltd. 58.61 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days after publication of 

these amended final results in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with these amended final 

results of review. We intend to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Where Alcha reported reliable entered 

values, we calculated importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem rates by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to each 

importer (or customer) and dividing this 

amount by the total entered value of the 

sales to each importer (or customer).8

Where Commerce calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

for reviewed sales to that party by the 

total sales quantity associated with 

those transactions, Commerce will 

direct CBP to assess importer- (or 

customer-) specific assessment rates 

based on the resulting per-unit rates.9

Where an importer- (or customer-) 

specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is 

greater than de minimis (i.e., 0.50 

percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to 

collect the appropriate duties at the time 

of liquidation.10 Where an importer- (or 

customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.11

For the non-selected respondent that 

received a separate rate, Yinbang Clad, 

we will instruct CBP to apply an 

antidumping duty assessment rate of 

58.61 percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise that entered the United 

States during the POR. For the 

companies that we determined had no 

reviewable entries of the subject 

merchandise in this review period, any 

suspended entries that entered under 

those exporters’ case numbers (i.e., at 

the exporters’ rates) will be liquidated at 

the China-wide rate, i.e., 59.72 

percent.12 For all other companies, we 

will instruct CBP to apply the 

antidumping duty assessment rate of the 

China-wide entity to all entries of 

subject merchandise exported by these 

companies.13

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise 

exported by the companies listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

in these final results of review for each 

exporter as listed above; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

except for the companies which lost 

their separate rate eligibility in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, or lost their separate rate 

eligibility in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
6506 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 24 / Friday, February 4, 2022 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

12599 (March 4, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

2As described in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, we have treated Canfor Corporation, 

Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood 

Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a 

single entity. See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2019,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum) at 

5. 

3As described in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, we have treated West Fraser Mills 

Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest 

Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. 

(collectively, West Fraser) as a single entity. See 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review—2020,’’ dated September 8, 

2021. 

5See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for 

Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. A list of the non-selected 

companies under review is included as Attachment 

II. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.224(e). 

Dated: January 31, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–02351 Filed 2–3–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–857] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

From Canada: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

softwood lumber products (softwood 

lumber) from Canada. The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2020, 

through December 31, 2020. Commerce 

preliminarily determines that the 

producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value. 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable February 4, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen (Canfor) and Maisha Cryor 

(West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769 

and (202) 482–5831, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 4, 2021, based on timely 

requests for administrative reviews, 

Commerce initiated an AD 

administrative review covering 275 

companies and has not rescinded the 

review of any of these companies.1

Thus, the review covers 275 producers/ 

exporters of the subject merchandise, 

including mandatory respondents 

Canfor 2 and West Fraser.3 The 

remaining companies were not selected 

for individual examination and remain 

subject to this administrative review. On 

September 8, 2021, we extended the 

preliminary results until January 28, 

2022.4

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this review is 

softwood lumber from Canada. For a full 

description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics is included in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum as Appendix I to 

this notice. The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is made available to the public via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be found at https://

access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices

ListLayout.aspx. 

Preliminary Results of the 

Administrative Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period January 1, 

2020, through December 31, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Canfor Corporation/Canadian 

Forest Products Ltd./Canfor 

Wood Products Marketing Ltd 4.92 

West Fraser Mills Ltd./Blue 

Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning 

Forest Products Ltd./and 

Sundre Forest Products Inc .... 4.63 

Non-Selected Companies ........... 4.76 

Rate for Companies Not Individually 

Examined 

Generally, when calculating margins 

for non-selected respondents, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act for guidance, which provides 

instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides 

that when calculating the all-others 

margin, Commerce will exclude any 

zero and de minimis weighted-average 

dumping margins, as well as any 

weighted-average dumping margins 

based on total facts available. 

Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice 

has been to average the margins for 

selected respondents, excluding margins 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. 

In this review, we calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

4.92 percent for Canfor and 4.63 percent 

for West Fraser. In accordance with 

section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 

Commerce assigned the weighted 

average of these two calculated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

based on their publicly ranged sales 

data, 4.76 percent, to the non-selected 

companies in these preliminary results.6

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

to the interested parties within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to verify the 

information relied upon in making its 

final determination. Normally, 

Commerce verifies information using 

standard procedures, including an onsite examination of original accounting, 

financial, and sales documentation. 

However, due to current travel 

restrictions in response to the global 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1