alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Direct Dial: 703.760.5204 

kpomfret@williamsmullen.com 

WILLIAMS MULLEN 

September 22, 2015 

BY ELECTRONIC PORTAL 

UAS Integration Office 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket FAA 2015-2205, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 12856 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

EagleView Technologies, Inc. ("EagleView") received FAA Exemption No. 12856 on 

September 15, 2015 (the "Exemption") authorizing it under Section 333 of the FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate several unmanned aircraft systems ("UAS") 

for aerial data collection. By this letter we request to amend the Exemption to add the senseFiy 

eXom; the Parrot Bebop; and the 3DR Iris+ to the list of UAS EagleView is permitted to operate 

under the Exemption. 

Eagle View will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in the Exemption 

except that Condition/Limitation Number 1 will need to be revised to include the (i) senseFiy 

eXom; (ii) Parrot Bebop; and (iii) 3DR Iris+. The list of "operating documents" will also need to 

be revised to include the operating documents for the three additional platforms. Copies of 

these operating documents will be provided upon request. 

Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public safety that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption. Since our request 

will not set a precedent, and our proposed use will improve safety for workers and reduce time 

and associated costs for a variety of industries that are important to our nation's economy, we 

ask that this request be considered on an expedited basis. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. Please contact me at 703.760.5204 or 

at kpomfret@williamsmullen.com if you have any questions. 

KDP/kmb 

8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1100 Tysons Corner, VA 22102 T 703.760.5200 F 703.748.0244 

williamsmullen.com I A Professional Corporation
exv10w38









Exhibit 10.38




Executive Officer Compensation Summary



Alseres Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (the “Company’s”) executive officers consist of: (i) Peter G.
Savas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; (ii) Mark J. Pykett, President and Chief Operating
Officer; and (iii) Kenneth L. Rice, Jr., Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.



2008 Incentive Compensation and 2009 Annual Base Salary: In January 2009, the compensation
committee of the board of directors approved the following 2008 incentive compensation amounts for
the executive officers and the following new base salaries for 2009, effective January 1, 2009:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	2008 Incentive	 	2009 Annual
	 	 	Compensation	 	Base Salary
	Mr. Savas
	 	$	—	 	 	$	401,625	 
	Mr. Pykett
	 	$	—	 	 	$	303,450	 
	Mr. Rice
	 	$	—	 	 	$	267,750
Luis MEDEROS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1477

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 14, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Wayne Paul MANNING, Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2483

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2018 Rehearing Denied April 25, 2018

Wayne Paul Manning, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Thomas H. Duffy and Kenneth S. Steely, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED.

Roberts, Rowe, and Makar, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

J anuary 2 9 , 2021 

# Order

Clerk January 2 9 , 2021

161051 ( 36 )

DOREEN ROTT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 161051

v COA: 347609

Oakland CC: 2015

- 148771

- NO

ARTHUR ROTT,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

___________________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to extend the time

for her reply brief is GRANTED. The reply brief submitted on January 28 , 2021 , is

accepted as timely filed

.
#### IN RE: Katherine B. ROBINSON, Appellant.

No. 17-1163

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: July 31, 2017

Katherine B. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:'

Katherine B. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing on res judicata grounds her civil complaint against the Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration and the Virginia Employment Commission, and the district court’s order issuing a prefiling injunction against Robinson for her repeated filing of similar complaints against these Defendants. This court affirmed the challenged orders by unpublished per cu-riam opinion filed on April 25, 2017, and the mandate in that appeal issued on June 19, 2017. *See Robinson v. Dep’t of Justice Drug Enf't Admin.,*No. 17-1036, 686 Fed. Appx. 159, 2017 WL 1476151 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 2017) (unpublished). Because we have previously affirmed the district court’s orders, this appeal is duplicative.

To the extent that Robinson’s appellate filings could be construed as a challenge to this court’s previous opinion affirming the district court’s orders, the time for filing a rehearing petition expired long ago. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1) (“Unless the time is shortened or extended by order or local rule, a petition for panel rehearing may be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment.”). Moreover, this court may recall its mandate to avoid injustice only in exceptional cases. *See Alphin v. Henson,*552 F.2d 1033, 1035 (4th Cir. 1977). “The sparing use of the power demonstrates it is one of last resort, to be held in reserve against grave, unforeseen contingencies.” *Calderon v. Thompson,*523 U.S. 538, 550, 118 S.Ct. 1489, 140 L.Ed.2d 728 (1998). Robinson’s is not an exceptional case and, thus, the district court’s orders are not subject to relitigation before this court.

Accordingly, we deny Robinson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 24.3
 
 STATE OF ALABAMA        §
 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON    §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, J. DAVID SIMMONS, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorneys-in-fact deem appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 18th day of June, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ J. David Simmons
 J. DAVID SIMMONS
 
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 18th day of June, 2010, came J. DAVID SIMMONS, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Janet L. Dunaway
 NOTARY PUBLIC
Walter Lynn ROBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case Nos. 2D17-1015 2D17-1031

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
J.onathan Rocha 

4873 N. Morning Star Dr. I Prescott Valley, AZ 86.314 I 928-8.30-4552 I jonblankrocha@gmail.com 

January 20, 20 16 

JJ~S .. Pep~u::tmenJ~Qt .Ir(lg~portatio11 . 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, D. C. 20590 

333 Petition Letter; Supplemental Document 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

This letter is to be used as a supplemental document for a 333 Exemption Petition 

letter that I submitted onJuly 3, 2015. The ID number assigned to my petition is 

FAA-2015 .. 3787-0001 and a Docket No. of FAA-2015-3787. Due to a lack of 

understanding in the petition process at the time of submittal, I feel that tny petition 

letter was missing pertinent and more accurate information that would assist in your 

department's review of my petition. I would like the following information to be 

added and considered alongside my petition letter: 

Full Legal Name:Jonathan Rocha (not 'jon Rocha" as submitted) 

Certificate No.: 3362953 

Privileges: Private Pilot; Airplane Single Engine Land 

Date of Issuance: February 20,2014 

Clarification for Petition: Pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 

11, Mr. Jonathan Rocha has filed a petition dated,July 3, 2015, for exemption as an 

operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) used for remote sensing to 

support aerial data collection, specifically photography and video capture of 
commercial and residential real estate properties. Mr. Rocha seeks an exemption 

from the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) listed in the petition referenced above to 

allow commercial operation of its UAs, so long as the operations are conducted 

under the conditions specified within the petition letter submitted on July 3, 2015. 

Additionally; my intention for the petition submitted was to receive an exemption 

from the FAR that would cover the commercial use of the VAS for Prescott Realty 

Inc., an Arizona real estate corporation, with Mr. Rocha being the sole and current 

operator of the VAS. I am currently operating as an Independent Contractor for 

Prescott Realty; Inc. as a real estate agent. 

I apologize for the inconvenience of filing an incomplete or inconclusive petition 

letter and hope that this additional information will allow for a better understanding 

of the premise to my petition. 

Respectfully; 

Jonathan Rocha 

Petitioner /Owner of VAS 

Page 2
Exhibit








Exhibit 4.4


PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
50 North Third Street
Post Office Box 3500
Newark, Ohio 43058-3500
(740) 349-8451
www.parknationalcorp.com


February 26, 2019






United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549




Re:     Park National Corporation
Commission File Number:  1-13006
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, 2018


Ladies and Gentlemen:


Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (“Park”), is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Park for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (“Park's 2018 Form 10-K”).
Neither (i) Park nor (ii) any of Park's consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Park and Park's subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Park hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument or agreement defining (i) the rights of holders of long-term debt of Park or (ii) the rights of holders of long-term debt of a consolidated subsidiary of Park, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to Park's 2018 Form 10-K.


Very truly yours,
PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
/s/ Brady T. Burt                                                      
Brady T. Burt
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
# Az Európai Unió C 134A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 134A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 57. évfolyam2014. május 3. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 134A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

57. évfolyam2014. május 3.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2014/C 134A/01 | Helyesbítés az EPSO/AD/278/14 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Tanácsosok (AD 7) az alábbi területeken: 1. Digitális kriminalisztika 2. Operatív elemzés — (Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 88 A., 2014. március 27.) | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2014/C 134A/01

Helyesbítés az EPSO/AD/278/14 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Tanácsosok (AD 7) az alábbi területeken: 1. Digitális kriminalisztika 2. Operatív elemzés — (Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 88 A., 2014. március 27.)

(Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 88 A., 2014. március 27.)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 134A/02 | A HL C A Versenyvizsga áttekintése | 2 |

2014/C 134A/02

A HL C A Versenyvizsga áttekintése

2

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 3.5.2014 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 134/1

---

Helyesbítés az EPSO/AD/278/14 nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Tanácsosok (AD 7)

az alábbi területeken:

| 1. | DIGITÁLIS KRIMINALISZTIKA |
| --- | --- |

1.

DIGITÁLIS KRIMINALISZTIKA

| 2. | OPERATÍV ELEMZÉS |
| --- | --- |

2.

OPERATÍV ELEMZÉS

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 88 A., 2014. március 27
  .)

2014/C 134 A/01

A 7. oldalon a VIII. cím 1. pontjában:

a következő szövegrész:

„Határidő (érvényesítéssel együtt): 2014. április 29., déli 12 óra, brüsszeli idő szerint.”

helyesen:

„Határidő (érvényesítéssel együtt): 2014. május 6., déli 12 óra, brüsszeli idő szerint.”

---

3.5.2014

| 3.5.2014 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 134/2

---

A HL C A „Versenyvizsga” áttekintése

2014/C 134 A/02

Itt találja a Hivatalos Lap C A sorozata idei publikációinak listáját.

Ellenkező jelzés híján, a HL-számok valamennyi nyelvi változatban elérhetők.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

---
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 09/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
```

[Federal Register: November 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 228)]
[Notices]               
[Page 73082]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29no10-85]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0058]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Approved Finance Provider (EIB 10-06).
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Approved Finance Provider will be used to 
determine if the finance provider has the financial strength and 
administrative staff to originate, administer, collect, and if needed, 
restructure international loans. This application will also improve Ex-
Im Bank' s compliance with the Open Government initiative by providing 
transparency into specific information used to determine if an 
applicant is qualified to use our loan guarantee programs. Export-
Import Bank potential finance providers will be able to submit this 
form on paper. In the future, we will consider allowing the submission 
of this information electronically.
    This application can be viewed at http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/EIB10_06.pfd.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 28, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Jeffrey Abramson, Export-Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-06 
Application for Approved Finance Provider.
    OMB Number: 3048-xxxx.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: The Application for Approved Finance Provider will be 
used to determine the financial and administrative capabilities of a 
financial provider who will arrange, fund and administer international 
loans.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 50.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 3 hours.
    Government Annual Burden Hours 8 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: As needed.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29909 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
To: mike.patrick@agfa.com, 

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject:

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US - Wednesday 05/02/2012 03:03 PM

Dear Mr. Patrick, This email is in response to the letter you submitted on April 13, 2011 to the TSCA 

Document Control Office requesting an exemption for any required testing of sodium glucoheptonate, 

CASRN 31138-65-5. 

As you note in your letter, you have corrected errors in the 2006 IUR submission to indicate the correct 

2005 imported quantity was 2066 lbs . In addition, you indicate that Agfa Corporation has not used the 

chemical CASRN 31138-65-5 since June of 2009 and Agfa does not intend to use sodium glucoheptonate 

in the near future.

40 CFR 799.5087 states the following:

(b) Am I subject to this section? (1) If you manufacture (including import) or intend to manufacture, or 

process or intend to process, any chemical substance listed in Table 2 in paragraph (j) of this section 

at any time from February 7, 2011 to the end of the test data reimbursement period as defined in 40 

CFR 791.3(h), you are subject to this section with respect to that chemical substance.

Since import of this substance ceased before February 7, 2011 and Agfa Corporation does not intend to 

import this chemical for any purpose including import for sale in the U.S. Agfa is not subject to the rule.

Mike, I think this answers your questions and effectively closes out this issue. Best regards, Paul

ER - AGFA - EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531-0626[1].pdf

Re: Exemption request Letter of April 13

mike.patrick to: Paul Campanella 04/18/2012 02:37 PM

Hello Paul,

At this moment, Agfa does not import this chemical in any of their products. I will check our parent 

company in Europe to see if there are any future uses for this material.

Kind Regards,

Michael Patrick | Agfa Graphics

EH&S Specialist | GS/Safety, Health & Environmental

T +1 908 231-5261 | F +1 908-231-1118

Agfa Corporation, 50 Meister Ave, Somerville New Jersey 08876

----- Forwarded by Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US on 04/19/2012 10:11 AM -----
From: pascal.meeus@agfa.com

To: mike.patrick@agfa.com

Cc: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, jos.vanholzaets@agfa.com

Date: 04/19/2012 02:01 AM

Subject: Re: Exemption request Letter of April 13

Dear all,

indeed we don't use this product anymore in our applications.

There are no future plans for re-use.

Pascal

 Kind regards, 

Pascal Meeus | Agfa Graphics

TQM Manager Chemicals & Raw Materials | GS/Total Quality Management Consumables

T +32 3444 3862 | F +32 3 400 9208 | M +32 494 5601 76

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091
~,pl'~. 

S10-100302-016 

CONTROL NO 

February 16, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. "".J 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

1--~-..~.:amwBtiF\g in S\;lpfl6ft-G~tlR~Microne-sia~s iq::.p~k;aMR-tQ-{ll'{}\t~~Wv·nmlsto.p-servke ~tween . 

Guam and Tokyo .Haneda airport. New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later this year, 

is made possible by the achievements of your office in securing a wide ranging open skies agreement 

with Japan. I applaud your efforts on the historic open skies agreement and now urge you to select 

Continental Micronesia to provide service connecting Guam's tourism and trade industry with Tokyo's 

central/downtown airport. 

Gual111s economy in part depends upon tourist traffic from points across the Asian region, with Japan 

beJng~critieal tourist market for the island. Haneda is ideally situated for the Japanese tourist who lives 

in central and southern/western Tokyo, and obtaining U.S. carrier scheduled service to/from Haneda will 

be a boost to Guam's travel marketing efforts. 

As Continental Micronesia is the only carrier operating a hub on Guam Continental Micronesia is the 

right choice for new Haneda service. Communities around Guam such as Saipan will also benefit from 

one-stop connections at Guam's airport to Haneda. Increased competition by U.S. carriers and the 

opportunity to choose among Continental Micronesia service and air services offered by Japanese 

airlines is important to our island communities. 

ConlinentarM1c::ionesi~r'stommifmeht to· the JifpanesEfma rker"arltf'6Ur Yegion· is.provehby thecai' rier's 

recent addition of flights to Fiji and Hong Kong. Service to Haneda further supplements the airline's 

growth, and therefore employment and economic benefits for Guam. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda se~vice to Continental Micronesia and my region of the U.S. 

Regards, ,".' .:. :

/) -y;;-- ..... 

~igT~On', 

!~~.• 

President &. CEO 

MCV Broadband 

P.O. Box 24728 GMF, Guam 96921 • Phone: (671) 635-4628 • Fax: (671) 632-6280 • mcvguam.com 

: ''''.. ~'t 
96921 

..~ 

~,~ 

''':~~ "'"_0;6.... 18 f; 

....".?Ol 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

-~.~--.. --------­ .:.;, .--­

t' 

0002584313 FEB 18 2010 

MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 96921 

., 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

illilllil HlI,lltl illUtI IIill I!
Kreg Santos PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4299

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Stephen D. RABOW, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Kimberly MCCLURE, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-1268

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.