AFS-10-163-E 

March 26, 2010 

 Exemption No. 9692A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-10875 

Sheryl R. Israel, Esq. 

Counsel for Fresh Water Adventures, Inc. 

Hogan & Hartson, LLP 

555 13th Street, NW. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Ms. Israel: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 9692. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 19, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Fresh Water Adventures, Inc. (FWA), for an extension of Exemption No. 9692. 

That exemption from § 91.323(b)(4) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows FWA to 

operate its Grumman Goose G-21A amphibian aircraft at a weight that exceeds the 

certificated weight at which the climb performance was demonstrated. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to FWA. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9692 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Before any operation is conducted under this exemption, the FAA principal operations 

inspector (POI) assigned to FWA must amend FWA’s operations specifications to 

include this exemption. 

2. Before any operation is conducted under this exemption, FWA must provide the POI 

with acceptable documentation applicable to each route FWA proposes to operate, 

demonstrating to the POI’s satisfaction that suitable alternative landing areas that 

would permit a safe landing by the affected aircraft in the event of the failure of one 

engine are available at all times. 

a. This documentation must establish to the POI’s satisfaction that the proposed 

landing area is free of hazards including, but not limited to, ice, logs, any 

living being, or any other substance that could endanger a safe landing; and 

b. This documentation must establish to the POI’s satisfaction that the proposed 

route to each landing area is free of any obstruction that extends above the 

surface that could endanger the descent to the landing area. 

3. Each FWA pilot in command must be trained in the provisions contained in this 

exemption before conducting operations under this exemption. 

4. All operations under this exemption are limited to visual flight rules conditions. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9692 to May 31, 2012, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9692 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9692. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service