alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6020 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to eliminate consideration of the 

income of organ recipients in providing reimbursement of expenses to 

donating individuals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Mr. OBERNOLTE (for himself and Ms. DELBENE) introduced the following bill 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to eliminate consideration of the income of organ recipients in providing 

reimbursement of expenses to donating individuals, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Our Living Do5 nors Act’’. 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6020 IH

1 SEC. 2. NO CONSIDERATION OF INCOME OF ORGAN RECIPI2 ENT. 

3 Section 377 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 274f(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) through (f) 

6 as subsections (d) through (g), respectively; and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(c) NO CONSIDERATION OF INCOME OF ORGAN RE10 CIPIENT.—The recipient of a grant under this section, in 

11 providing reimbursement to a donating individual through 

12 such grant, shall not give any consideration to the income 

13 of the organ recipient.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF EXPECTATION OF PAYMENTS BY 

15 ORGAN RECIPIENTS. 

16 Section 377(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

17 U.S.C. 274f(d)) is amended— 

18 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the 

19 end; 

20 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in21 serting a period; and 

22 (3) by striking paragraph (3). 

23 SEC. 4. ANNUAL REPORT. 

24 Section 377 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 274f), as amended, is further amended by adding 

26 at the end the following: 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6020 IH

1 ‘‘(h) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than December 31 

2 of each year, the Secretary shall— 

3 ‘‘(1) prepare, submit to the Congress, and make 

4 public a report on whether grants under this section 

5 provided adequate funding during the preceding fis6 cal year to reimburse all donating individuals for all 

7 qualifying expenses; and 

8 ‘‘(2) include in each such report— 

9 ‘‘(A) the estimated number of all donating 

10 individuals who did not receive reimbursement 

11 for all qualifying expenses during the preceding 

12 fiscal year; and 

13 ‘‘(B) the total amount of funding that is 

14 estimated to be necessary to fully reimburse all 

15 donating individuals for all qualifying ex16 penses.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Dion T. STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-1946

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

CRESCENT BANKING COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Banking Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Donald Boggus, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. DONALD BOGGUS, JR.J. Donald Boggus, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2007
#### My’Ka EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. REESE, Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department; M. Sullivan, Officer; S. Selogy, Officer; FNU Meyers, Officer; FNU Agape, Officer; K. S. Kodad, Officer; FNU Issac, Officer; FNU Airtone, Lieutenant; S. Mobley; T. Moore; T. Wilson; J. Fletcher, Officer; J. Parker; P. Moore; L.B. Diggs; B. Butler; Nurse FNU Green, Sergeant; M. W. Womble; M. T. Retort; B. Scarey; T. Castano; FNU Stouts, Sergeant; R. Monroe; J. H. Frison; R. Burnett; Bradon Jolly, North Carolina State Trooper; W. L. Canter; Cooper Jerrell, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; FNU Eason; FNU Street, Sergeant; FNU Gant, Sergeant; FNU Hood, Officer; R. Chapman, Mecklenburg County Magistrate, Defendants.

No. 17-6397

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

My’Ka El, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Edward Peterson, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

*161Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

My’Ka El appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for the appointment of counsel and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *El v.*Reese, 3:16-cv-00051-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Aug 18, 2016 & Feb. 28, 2017). We deny El’s motion seeking a restraining order and the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,385
<SECURITIES>                                       993
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (234)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,210
<PP&E>                                           2,930
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,643)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,115
<BONDS>                                            186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,235
<SALES>                                          2,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,282)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,282)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,282)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
Jorge E. MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. Denise Annery ARIAS, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-640

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 14, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
STATES of Louisiana v. Toby CHAUVIN

NO. 2017-K-1120

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.

GENOVESE, J., would grant.
Exhibit 32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October  5, 2005 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the undersigned
hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.


          March 31, 2006         /s/ Stephen E. Pomeroy
                                 -------------------------------------
                                 Stephen E. Pomeroy
                                 Chief Executive Officer and President


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this order should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-50956

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS CORTEZ-GERONIMO also known as, Jose Luis Cortes

Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, Austin

---------------------

Before JOLLY, GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence of the district court is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand case to the United States District Court for resentencing is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellee’s alternative

unopposed motion to extend time to file it’s brief thirty days

after this court’s denial of the motion to vacate and remand is

DENIED AS MOOT.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute

TO: Christine Davis 

FROM: George Van Houtven, Vesall Nourani 

DATE: May 20, 2011 

SUBJECT: Data Used for Benefits Analysis in Mercury/Utility MACT RIA 

To provide the additional data and documentation requested, we have compiled the following files for the 

docket: 

Hucbuffer.accdb – This file contains four variables: fips, huc12, ring, and xarea. Each census tract (fips) 

has a HUC12 area (xarea) associated with each ring around the tract center. These data were used to link 

tract-level populations with area-weighted (HUC12 area) average Hg concentrations in each distance 

category. 

Tract-level population data – There are several files with Census tract level populations (2000), 

including for Chippewa (chip_pop.xlsx), Laotian (lao_pop.xlsx), Hispanic (Hispanic_pop.xlsx), Lowincome Females (Low-income_Femalex.xlsx). In addition, the file tract_all_white_black.xlsx contains 

the following demographic data for the total, White, and Black populations by Census tract: 

1. Fips – Tract Code 

2. Totpop – total tract population in 2000. 

3. Fem15_44 – Total female population aged 15 to 44 in 2000. 

4. Povuniv – subpopulation for whom poverty data is available 2000. 

5. Belowpov – population below poverty from among povuniv. 

6. Totpopw – Total white tract population in 2000. 

7. Totpopwf – Total white female tract population in 2000. 

8. Wfem15_44 – Total white female tract population between ages 15 and 44 in 2000. 

9. Totpopb – Total black tract population in 2000. 

10. Totpopbf – Total black female tract population in 2000. 

11. bfem15_44 – Total black female tract population between ages 15 and 44 in 2000. 

12. Povunivw – white subpopulation for whom poverty data is available 2000. 

13. Belowpovw – white population below poverty from among white povuniv. 

14. Belowpovwf – white female population below poverty from among white povuniv. 

15. Povunivb – black subpopulation for whom poverty data is available 2000. 

16. Belowpovb – black population below poverty from among black povuniv. 

17. Belowpovb – black female population below poverty from among black povuniv. 

State_demographics.xlsx – State-level data for additional demographic variables used in the analysis: 

1. Lake_Percent_2001 – Percent of trips taken by state anglers to lakes 2001. 

2. River_Percent_2001 – Percent of trips taken by state anglers to rivers in 2001. 

3. Angler_Percent_2006 – Percent of in-state population that are anglers 2006. 

4. Fertility_2006 – Fertility rate 2006.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gregory GREENE, Defendant-Appellant.

16-2877-cr

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 6, 2017

FOR APPELLEE: Amy Busa and Peter Baldwin, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Robert L. Capers, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY.

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Anthony Ricco, New York, NY.

PRESENT: Jon 0. Newman, José A. Cabranes, Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendant-appellant Gregory Greene appeals from an August 18, 2016 judgment of conviction entered by the District Court, sentencing him to concurrent terms of 66 months’ and 60 months’ imprisonment. Greene contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the District Court failed to account for factors in his individual background and history that influenced his upbringing. The government argues that, because Greene knowingly and voluntarily signed a valid and enforceable appellate waiver as part of his written plea agreement, he has waived his right to appeal his sentence. We #gree.

In paragraph four of his plea agreement, Greene agreed not to file an appeal challenging his sentence “in the event that the Court imposes a term of imprisonment of 97 months or below.” A 57. The District Court sentenced Greene to concurrent terms of 66 months’ and 60 months’ imprisonment, a sentence well below the 97-month term set forth in Greene’s plea agreement. Because “a defendant’s knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal a sentence within an agreed-upon Guidelines range is enforceable,” *United States v. Johnson,*347 F.3d 412, 414 (2d Cir. 2003), and because none of the limited exceptions to the enforcement of waivers is applicable here, *see United States v. Arevalo,*628 F.3d 93, 98 (2d Cir. 2010) (explaining that courts will “find waivers unenforceable only in very limited situations”), we conclude that Greene waived his right to appeal his sentence.

CONCLUSION

We have considered all of the arguments raised by Greene on appeal and find them to be without merit. For the foregoing *70reasons, Greene’s appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000883976
<NAME>                        RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     blank

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-02-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,418
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    10,049
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               33,530
<PP&E>                                         198,555<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          43,621
<BONDS>                                        52,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       115,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,481
<SALES>                                        230,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,031
<CGS>                                          82,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,661
<INCOME-TAX>                                   5,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,811
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,811
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.93

<FN>
<F1> ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>

</TABLE>
| 1.   | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:            |   | March 31, 2010                |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|  Signature: |   |  /s/ Terry Lee           |
|  Title:     |   |  Chief Executive Officer |
Michael Keith MILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-2200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[March 22, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 2, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00474

- CV

Abraham Johnson , Appellant

v.

AAHC Davenport Place Apartments MM LLC , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on June 26, 2024 . Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that Abraham Johnson has not prosecuted hi s appeal a nd did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for

want of prosecution. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court

and in the court below.
<TABLE>
                   Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
              Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
                (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<CAPTION>

                          Quarter Ended
                      
                             April 5,
                           1997    1998
                          ______  ______
BASIC
<S>                       <C>     <C>
Weighted average common 
shares outstanding        10,336  11,392
                          ======  ======

Net income                $2,958  $4,277
                          ======  ======

Net income per 
common share              $ 0.29  $ 0.38 
                          ======  ======

DILUTED
Weighted average common 
shares outstanding        10,336  11,392
                          ======  ======


Dilutive effect of stock 
options outstanding 
during the period            313     319

Contingent shares             -       -
                          ------  ------
Total common and common
equivalent shares         10,649  11,711

                          ======  ======

Net income                $2,958  $4,277
                          ======  ======


Net income per 
common share              $ 0.28  $ 0.37 
                          ======  ======
</TABLE>
Malik GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-207

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 21, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Vaughn MCCOY, DOC #T84300, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5221

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
----

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report containing the financial statements fully complies with                  the                  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy                  IT                  Solutions, Inc. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  November                15, 2007 |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   | /s/                  Kevin G. Gregory |
|                                   | Kevin                  G. Gregory |
|                                   | Senior                  Vice President and Chief Financial                  Officer |

----
Jorge SLAUGHTER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

AUGUST 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.