alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02528]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Rescission of Finding of No Significant Impact for the I-5 Rose 
Quarter Improvement Project in Portland, Oregon

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that it 
has rescinded the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the I-5 
Rose Quarter Improvement Project, a proposed highway project on 
Interstate 5 in Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Cline, Environmental Program 
Manager, FHWA Oregon Division Office, 530 Center St. NE, Salem, OR 
97301, Office Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Office Phone: 503-316-
2547, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37725a5e5b4e19545b5e59527753584319505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97d2fafefbeeb9f4fbfef9f2d7f3f8e3b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>. You may also contact Megan Channell, 
Rose Quarter Project Director, ODOT Region 1, 123 NW Flanders St., 
Portland, OR 97209, Office Phone: 971-233-6510, Office Hours, 8:00 
a.m.-5:00 p.m., Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#511c3436303f7f1239303f3f343d3d113e353e257f22253025347f3e237f2422"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a476f6d6b642449626b64646f66664a656e657e24797e6b7e6f246578247f79">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from the 
Office of the Federal Register's website at www.FederalRegister.gov and 
the Government Publishing Office's website at www.GovInfo.gov.

Background

    On November 6, 2020, at 85 FR 71136, FHWA advised the public that 
it had prepared a Revised Environmental Assessment and a FONSI for the 
I-5 Rose Quarter Improvement Project. The proposed improvements would 
extend existing auxiliary lanes in the northbound and southbound 
directions to improve safety and operations on Interstate-5 (I-5) 
between Interstate 84 and Interstate 405, and make improvements to 
local streets to improve multimodal connections over I-5. Changes made 
to the project after the FONSI was issued necessitate vacating that 
finding and conducting additional analysis to account for altered 
environmental impacts before proceeding. A new decision under the 
National Environmental Policy Act and any other necessary Federal 
environmental determinations will be issued consistent with this 
additional analysis.

Phillip A. Ditzler,
Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-02528 Filed 2-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. In re: Terry MCLEOD v. Joyce Ann Tarver, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2402

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

NOVEMBER 16, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-80301, 333-16205, 333-37138, 333-40276, 333-47033, 333-71151, 333-82752, 333-104968, 333-109317 and 333-131796) of PAREXEL International Corporation of our reports dated August 27, 2008, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PAREXEL International Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PAREXEL International Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 2008.



|                      |  |                      
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                      |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|                      | 
|Boston, Massachusetts |  |                      
|August 27, 2008       |  |
**EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO Certification**

 

**HEARTLAND, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADDED BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Heartland, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Gruenbaum, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

By: /s/ Jerry Gruenbaum

Jerry Gruenbaum

Chief Financial Officer, and

Director

 

July 5, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heartland, Inc., and will be retained by Heartland, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1244

       To repeal certain foreign affairs reporting requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 23, 2021

 Mrs. Kim of California (for herself and Mr. Connolly) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal certain foreign affairs reporting requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN FOREIGN AFFAIRS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions of law are hereby 
repealed:
            (1) Subsection (b) of section 804 of Public Law 101-246.
            (2) Section 6 of Public Law 104-45.
            (3) Section 406 of Public Law 101-246 (22 U.S.C. 2414a).
            (4) Subsection (c) of section 702 of Public Law 96-465 (22 
        U.S.C. 4022).
            (5) Section 404 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 
        U.S.C. 2593b).
            (6) Section 5 of Public Law 94-304 (22 U.S.C. 3005).
            (7) Subsection (b) of section 502 of the International 
        Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1985 (22 U.S.C. 
        2349aa-7).
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (c) of section 
502 of the International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 
1985 (22 U.S.C. 2349aa-7) is redesignated as subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6011 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to notify applicants of the completion status of right-of-
   way applications under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and 
   Management Act of 1976 and section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right-Of-Way Application 
Transparency and Accountability Act'' or the ``ROWATA Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION REGARDING RIGHTS-OF-WAY.

    (a) Notice.--Not later than 90 days after the Secretary concerned 
receives an application to grant a right-of-way, the Secretary 
concerned shall--
            (1) notify the applicant as to whether the application is 
        complete; or
            (2) notify the applicant that information is missing and 
        specify any information that is required to be submitted for 
        the application to be complete.
    (b) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Right-of-way.--The term ``right-of-way'' means--
                    (A) a right-of-way issued, granted, or renewed 
                under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and 
                Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761); or
                    (B) a right-of-way granted under section 28 of the 
                Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 185).
            (2) Secretary concerned.--The term ``Secretary concerned'' 
        means--
                    (A) with respect to public lands, the Secretary of 
                the Interior; and
                    (B) with respect to National Forest System lands, 
                the Secretary of Agriculture.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 11, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 6011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to notify applicants of the completion status of right-of-
   way applications under section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and 
   Management Act of 1976 and section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act.
```
#### DESIGN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC, doing business as Bettie Page Clothing and DTG California Management, LLC, doing business as Bettie Page Clothing, Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Vanessa Morris, Intervenor

No. 14-1232 Consolidated with 14-1303

September Term, 2016

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed on: March 15, 2017

David Richard Koch, Koch *&*Scow LLC, Henderson, NV, for Petitioners

Ruth E. Burdick, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Kellie J. Isbell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB) Appellate and Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent

David A. Rosenfeld, Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Intervenor for Respondent

Elizabeth Ann Gaudio, National Federation of Independent Business, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae for Petitioner '

Before: Henderson and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Randolph, Senior Circuit Judge.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

These cases were considered on the record from the National Labor Relations Board and the briefs and supplemental briefs of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 36; D.C. *4Cir. R. 36(d). Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the cases are remanded for reconsideration of the remedy in light of changed circumstances.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6006

KEVIN P. RIVERA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections; TRACY RAY, Offender Management Services; JAMES 

PARKS, Offender Management Services; KAREN BROWN, Chairman of 

the VA Parole Board,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:15-cv-00143-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin P. Rivera, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE 

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin P. Rivera seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Rivera has not made the requisite showing with respect to the first 

claim for relief in his § 2254 petition. Furthermore, because 

Rivera’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the 

district court’s disposition of the remaining claims presented in

his petition, Rivera has forfeited appellate review of that portion 
3

of the court’s order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
----

|   | 1. | The      Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Pomeroy IT      Solutions, Inc. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      15, 2008 |                                       |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|              | /s/      Keith R. Coogan         |
|              | Keith R. Coogan                  |
|              | Chief      Executive Officer and President |

----
Exhibit 99.21



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §1350



I, R. Gregory Miller, the chief financial officer of California Micro Devices Corporation (the Company) certify for the purpose of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to
my knowledge:



| | (i) |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) |  | the information in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  | 
|------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: June 30, 2003 |  |  | 
|                    |  |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. §1350 has been provided to California Micro Devices Corporation and will be retained by California Micro Devices Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

|1 |  | The material contained in this Exhibit 99.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2  Section 906 CFO Certification

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended April 5, 2004 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the
undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.


          May 17, 2004               /s/ Michael E. Rohrkemper
                                     -------------------------
                                     Michael E. Rohrkemper
                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Pomeroy IT
Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>
William Thomas BEDWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2594

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### GUOXIONG LIN, Petitioner, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 13-72120

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*522Submitted February 14, 2017 *

Filed February 23, 2017

Jisheng Li, Attorney, Law Office of Jisheng Li, Honolulu, HI, for Petitioner

Lisa Morinelli, Attorney, OIL, Manuel Palau, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

The stay of proceedings in this case expired on May 7, 2015. Thus, respondent’s request to lift the stay (Docket Entry No. 25) is denied as unnecessary.

Guoxiong Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. *Zehatye v. Gonzales,*453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Lin’s experiences in China did not rise to the level of persecution. *See Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that persecution is “an extreme concept”); *Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2006) (evidence did not compel the finding that petitioner demonstrated past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Lin failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution in China. *See Gu,*454 F.3d at 1022 (petitioner failed to present “compelling, objective evidence demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution”). We reject Lin’s contention that the BIA failed to consider evidence. *See Larita-Martinez v. INS,*220 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (9th Cir. 2000) (petitioner did not overcome the presumption that the BIA considered the evidence). Thus, Lin’s asylum claim fails.

Because Lin failed to satisfy the lower standard of proof for asylum, it necessarily follows that he failed to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 21, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 417 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on February 20, 2019, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-228800) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President