alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Steve Alan MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Troy D. Simpson; Koklia Naik, Defendants-Appellees

No. 16-20165 Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

October 6, 2017

Steve Alan Morgan (State Prisoner: # 1222355), Richmond, TX, pro se.

Heather Kyiscenski Rhea, Jared E. Brehmer, Briana Marie Webb, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steve Alan Morgan, Texas prisoner # 1222355, has given notice of his appeals *232from the district court’s interlocutory orders in his civil rights action denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order, for leave to amend the complaint (two motions), and for appointment of counsel (two motions), for summary judgment, for leave to expand the record, and for a physical examination.

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” *Bowles v. Russell,*551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007). In a civil matter, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Morgan’s notices of appeal were not filed within that period. *See id.*Although Morgan’s second notice of appeal was filed within the 30-day period to request an extension of time based on excusable neglect or good cause, *see*Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), we have not deemed it as such a request because Morgan did provide any explanation in that document for his untimely filing.

Since the filing of the notices of appeal in this case, the district court has entered final judgment dismissing the complaint. Although an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted by Morgan within 30 days of entry of the judgment, that document did not clearly notify the court or opposing counsel of the taking of an appeal from that decision under the circumstances of this case. *See Fischer v. U.S. Dept. of Justice,*759 F.2d 461, 464 n.2 (5th Cir. 1985); *see also*Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B).

The appeal is DISMISSED. *See Bowles,*551 U.S. at 213-14, 127 S.Ct. 2360. Morgan’s motions for leave to file a supplemental reply brief; for suspension of the rules; to substitute S. Abron for appellee Naik; and for an appeal conference are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *232published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Demond L. CORBIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D18-267

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.30
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend in person.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.'s 2014 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.16 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.9





The following current executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with the Company in the form filed herewith. The information listed below is inserted into the blanks for the respective executive officer’s Executive Severance Agreement.
	
							
	 
	 
	Salary Multiplier Rate
	 
	Termination Period
	 
	Change of Control
Continuation Period

	 
	 
	(Section 4(a)(4))
	 
	(Section 1(n))
	 
	(Section 2)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Blake W. Krueger
	 
	3
	 
	3 years
	 
	36 months

	James D. Zwiers
	 
	2
	 
	2 years
	 
	24 months
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 007 Attachment Name Attachment 7 PbNbTiZrO Structure Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, le. (Chem 5)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number CONSi 10317786855351Attachment 7 PbNbTiZrO Structure REPORT# - CONS 110317786855351 Niobium PZT Trade names: PZT-5A; LM-51 Niobium PZT is processed in 25 kg batches, weighing and batching is 2brs/batch, powder break-up and calcine is 4hrslbatch (exposure time); final mill and spray dry is 2 hrs/batch. Total process exposure time is 8hours/batch, maximum 100 batches/year. See process flow chart for detailed process. Niobium PZT has an infinite repeating crystal structure ofthe ABO3 Perovskite structure where A=Pb, B=Nb, Zr and Ti; Formula is: 

### Pb (Zr.51 . 55Ti. 4 q_ 45)x 

### Nbt-x~03 where the Zr + 

### Ti mole ratio =1.00 

### and x= .94-.98

0 Constituents: Lead Oxide 68 wt% Zirconium dioxide 17-19 wt % Titanium dioxide 10-12Wt% Niobium pentoxide 1-3 wt%
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 15



Catalina Marketing Corporation
11300 9th Street North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33716

November 13, 2000

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Catalina Marketing Corporation has incorporated by reference
in its Registration Statement Nos. 33-46793, 33-77100, 33-82456, 333-07525,
333-13335 and 333-86905, its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2000, which includes our report dated October 12, 2000, covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), that report is not considered a part of
the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
the Act.

Very truly yours,

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Transport Transports

Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 593 . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidat e the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Can ada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address.

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communica tions Centre (AARC)

at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059

, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp

24-0022 (01-2005) 1/1 No

. CF-2009-12

Issue Date 24 March 2009

Number: CF-2009-12

Subject: Corrosion of Tail Rotor Balance Weights

Effective: 4 May 2009

Applicability: Eurocopter Canada BO 105 LS A-3 helicopters.

Compliance: Initially, within the next 2 months or 100 hour s air time, whichever occurs first after the

effective date of this direct ive, unless already accomplished. Thereafter at intervals not exceeding 600 hours air time or 48 months, whichever occurs first.

Background: During a periodical inspection, corrosion was detected on the tail rotor balance weights in

the area of the attachment thread.

This condition, if not corrected, could lead to balance weight separation from the tail rotor, resulting in severe vibration and consequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Corrective

Actions: Perform the initial and repeat inspections of the tail rotor balance weights and control levers in accordance with the accomplishment instructions of Eurocopter Canada Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) BO 105 LS 30-12, dated 12 December 2008, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.

If, as a result of the inspections above, t he detected damage exceeds the acceptable limits specified in ASB BO 105 LS 30-12, replace the affected parts with serviceable parts before next flight. Replacement of parts does not c onstitute terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of this directive.

Authorization: For Minister of Transport, In frastructure and Communities

Derek Ferguson Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Contact: Mr. Bogdan Gajewski, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4450, facsimile 613-996-9178 or e-mail: bogdan.gajew ski@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada

Centre
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .
Agreement s Adopte d byth e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n 

## OST-2011- ' 00^, 1

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B YTH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN T APPROVE D & IMMUNIZE D ^ ^ DOCKETOST-./^-._-$.£££!

_^AT E>^-*^ ' ^^ f

"^^I f Thi s approval unc

i ^nw A o f anti'rus t imn-.; : iject , wher e appiicable , t o condition s previousi y i.iiposod . Tirir , actio ni s effectiv e after

7 day s unles s apetitio ni s filedu.inic r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertai'.es ; nnth e Department' s O-VP . jv.otion . I nvie w o f th e agreement' s noncontroversiai natur e an dth e avaiiabi'ii y o f th e above^r^cedure , the^-^y^g^oj j i n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived .

irector , Offic e o f

International Aviatio n 

### 1 5 Februar

y201 1 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Dougla s E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h Americ a Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n 177 6 K.St . N.W . #12"'Floo r Washingto n D C 2000 6
Bernard BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D17-2563

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed January 10, 2018

Bernard Brown, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Branden J. BAILEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-1466

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018

Branden J. Bailey, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *See* *Landmark at Crescent Ridge LP v. Everest Fin., Inc.,* 219 So.3d 218, 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (explaining that where the threshold requirement of irreparable harm is not established, the petition for writ of certiorari must be dismissed).

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0 142 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. CHEYENNE LEILANI - AM BER ZIELIE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including October 4 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 27 2024

08/27/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0142
November 11, 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. West Building Ground Floor, Room W - 12 - 140 Dear Sir or Madam, Gateway Canyons Air Tours, LLC, FAA Certificate #7GCA305M, is requesting that that an exemption be given allowing all company personnel to be tested under one Alcohol and Drug Testing Program. **We are extremely hopeful that this exemption could go into**  **effect by November 22, 2011.** We are a FAR 135 “on Demand, Charter and Tour operation, and a FAR 91, “local tour” operation. W have three aircraft – two fixed wing, and one helicopter. All are certificated to operate under Part 91. We have two pilots, bo th of whom are drug tested under our Part 135 certificate. I have direct contact with all the company personnel and am confident of my ability to supervise the Alcohol and Drug Testing Program. An exemption would also decrease the company’s expense of having to maintain two separate programs. If you have concerns or questions, please feel free to contact me, Michael J. Gullotti, at any of the following: Cell 1 -970 - 314 - 3469 Office 1 - 970 - 243 -4359 Email michael. gullotti@gatewaycanyonsairtours. com I look forward to hearing from you soon. Thank you for your time and attention regarding this request. Respectfully submitted, Michael J. Gullotti Chief Pilot Gateway Canyons Air Tours, LLC
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Abviva, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-KSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  September 11, 2008  /s/ Barrett Evans ---------------------- Barrett Evans Interim Chief Executive Officer And Principal Accounting Officer
# Rear Admiral Eric J. “Pappy” Anduze

##                 Deputy Commander  Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, Djibouti, Djibouti            

Rear Adm. Eric J. Anduze is a native of Manati, Puerto Rico. He graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 1993, earning a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering. He subsequently entered flight training and was designated a naval aviator in 1996.

Operationally, he has served in numerous fighter squadrons flying the F-14A/B/D and FA-18E/F. His fleet assignments include the Black Aces of Fighter Squadron (VF) 41, Black Knights of Fighter Squadron (VF) 154 and Pukin’ Dogs of Fighter Squadron (VF) 143. He commanded the Pukin’ Dogs of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 143, USS Blue Ridge (LCC 19) and USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). He deployed multiple times in support of operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, Allied Force/Noble Anvil and Inherent Resolve on USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63), USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67), USS Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71), and USS George Washington (CVN 73).

Ashore, Anduze’s assignments include duties at Fighter Squadron (VF) 101 where he served as the pilot strike phase tactics officer, Joint Forces Command where he served in the joint concepts branch of the Directorate for Joint Experimentation (J-7), and Commander Naval Air Forces Atlantic Fleet where he served as assistant chief of staff for aviation training and readiness (N40) and as assistant chief of staff for carrier readiness (N81).

Anduze is a graduate of Navy’s Fighter Weapons School (TOPGUN), Joint Staff College and the Navy Nuclear Power Program. He has accumulated more than 3,500 mishap free flight hours and more than 900 carrier-arrested landings. His personal decorations include the Legion of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal, Strike/Flight Air Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, and Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal.

Anduze is currently serving as the Deputy Commander, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, Djibouti, Djibouti.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the quarterly report of RARE Hospitality International, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Douglas Benn, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





|Dated:  November 4, 2005 | /s/ W. Douglas Benn                   | 
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------- | 
|                         | W. Douglas Benn                       | 
|                         | Executive Vice President, Finance and
|                         | Chief Financial Officer              
|                         |                                       |
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18
U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant Talk
Communications, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief,
that:




(1)           The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Date:  March
      31, 2010
              /s/
      Steven van der VeldenSteven
      van der Velden, President and Chief Executive Officer




This certification shall not be deemed
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.







Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (18
U.S.C. 1350)
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of Elephant
Talk Communications, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief,
that:
  (1)           The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
      March 31, 2010
                /s/
      Mark NijeMark
      Nije, Chief Financial Officer
  This certification shall not be deemed
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification will not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoine J. LOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6481

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: August 1, 2017

Antoine J. Lott, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Nicholas Bianchi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and FLOYÍ), Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*166PER CURIAM:

Antoine J. Lott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6073 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6073 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER DAVID FITZGERALD 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in Phila5 delphia, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Christopher 

12 David Fitzgerald Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6073 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posting’’. Christopher David Fitzgerald Post Office Build- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Sergeant al Service located at 9925 Bustleton Avenue in
Kyle DAVIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Irina V. DAVIS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2300

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 30, 2017

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, it is ordered that said petition is hereby dismissed.

SUAREZ, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ., concur.
Marvin BROWN, DOC#Y52298, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3985

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 16, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.