alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Официален вестник C 182A/14 ю

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 182A |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 5714 юни 2014 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 182A

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 5714 юни 2014 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Становища |
| | АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ |
| | Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 182A/01 | Уведомление за отмяна | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

V   Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO)

2014/C 182A/01

Уведомление за отмяна

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 182A/02 | Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси | 2 |

2014/C 182A/02

Преглед на броевете на Официален вестник серия С А Конкурси

2

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

V Становища

АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ ПРОЦЕДУРИ

Европейска служба за подбор на персонал (EPSO)

| 14.6.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 182/1

---

УВЕДОМЛЕНИЕ ЗА ОТМЯНА

2014/C 182 A/01

Конкурсите на общо основание

| — | EPSO/AST/127/13 — коректори (AST 3) с гръцки език (EL)

  и |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/127/13 — коректори (AST 3) с гръцки език (EL)

и

| — | EPSO/AST/128/13 — коректори (AST 3) с португалски език (PT), |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/128/13 — коректори (AST 3) с португалски език (PT),

за които бяха публикувани обявления в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз
   (1), са отменени.

---

(1)  ОВ C 131 A, 8.5.2013 г., стр. 1.

---

14.6.2014

| 14.6.2014 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CA 182/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CA 182/2

---

ПРЕГЛЕД НА БРОЕВЕТЕ НА ОФИЦИАЛЕН ВЕСТНИК СЕРИЯ С А КОНКУРСИ

2014/C 182 A/02

По-долу е даден списък на броевете на Официален вестник от серия С А, публикувани през настоящата година.

Освен ако не е посочено друго, броевете на Официален вестник са публикувани на всички езици.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        290,856
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,182,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,551,168
<PP&E>                                        582,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,352,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,044,960
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      5,265
<OTHER-SE>                                    925,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,352,804
<SALES>                                       2,872,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         2,138,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              331,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            21,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               385,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           385,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               8,899
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  394,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .08



</TABLE>
0 0 

0 0 

11 0 OJ projection of the structure ofpolycrystallinc calcium aluminate sulfate, CAS. Cn, I urge circles, 

S04 centers, smoll circles; nl04 centers, linking lines. 

fORM EPA 7710-25 (Rcv.5-95) Page 4
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SED International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Lyle Dickler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Dated: September 24, 2009

|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Lyle Dickler              
|                              
|Lyle Dickler                  
|Chief Financial Officer       
|(Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
Baseline (Non-LTT) Water Quality Monitoring Sites

Oct. 1, 2009 - Sept. 30, 2010

Region Basin Watershed ID Watershed Stream Location SNOR St. Croix LS13-280 Tyler Forks Tyler Forks Copper Falls State Park 

SCR East SP16-180 West Branch Sugar R./Mt. Vernon Creek West Branch Sugar River CTH PB 

SCR West LW15-173 Mill and Blue Mounds Creek Mill Creek CTH C 

SER Inland SH01-060 Sauk and Sucker Creeks Sucker Creek Sucker Brook Lane 

WCR Central Wisconsin LW25-172 Duck and Plainville Creeks White Creek CTH Z 

WCR Lower Chippewa LC15-262 Black and Hay Creeks Hay Creek at CTH NL 

WCR Lower Chippewa LC04-262 Wilson Creek Wilson Creek at 390th or 385th Ave.
Marcus MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1012

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Hugo GARCIA-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant

No. 17-40021 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed August 18, 2017

Carmen Castillo Mitchell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Victor Hugo Garcia-Valencia, Pro Se

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo Garcia-Valencia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and *United States v. Flores,*632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Valencia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Porshaun Walker, Appellants, v. Michael Eady BROWN, Appellee.

No. 1D17-2671

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 20, 2018

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Carrie R. McNair, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for Appellant Department of Revenue.

No appearance for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

As the result of a request from the Nevada Child Support Enforcement Program to determine paternity and support for minor child Z.W., the Florida Department of Revenue (the "Department") initiated the present paternity action.

On January 20, 2017, the Department served Appellee, Z.W.'s putative father, with a Notice of Administrative Proceeding to Establish Paternity pursuant to section 409.256(4)(a)7.b., Florida Statutes. In April 2017, Appellee received the results of a DNA test establishing that he was Z.W.'s father.

A hearing was held on the Department's Proposed Administrative Paternity and Support Order, where the Department requested that Appellee be required *527to pay retroactive child support for the period beginning twenty-four months before Appellee was served with notice of the paternity proceeding, the maximum amount allowed by section 61.30(17), Florida Statutes. The Division of Administrative Hearings issued a final support order on June 22, 2017, finding the minor child had a need for support and Appellee had the ability to pay, and ordering, *inter alia* , that Appellee pay retroactive support from April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017, based on the date Appellee received notice of the DNA test results establishing his paternity of Z.W.

However, "the service date of the notice of paternity proceeding ... should be the operative date for administrative proceedings in which the Department uses the bifurcated procedure in section 409.256(4)." *Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Sorto v. LaGree* , 106 So.3d 534, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). " Section 61.30(17), as well, supports using the service date of the notice of paternity proceeding to determine the retroactive period." *Id.* at 536.

Here, the Department served Appellee with a Notice of Administrative Proceeding to Establish Paternity pursuant to section 409.256(4)(a)7.b., Florida Statutes, on January 20, 2017. Therefore, the order should have calculated retroactive support based on the service date of the paternity proceeding, not the date that Appellee was given notice of the DNA test results.

We reverse the final order and remand for a recalculation of retroactive child support based on the date that Appellee was served with notice of the paternity action.

REVERSED and REMANDED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Lewis and Makar, JJ., concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darnell BARNES, a/k/a Imani, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6984

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Decided: October 24, 2017

Darnell Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darnell Barnes appeals the district court’s orders denying his letter motions asking that his sentence be reduced under Amendment 794 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Muldrow,*844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard). A district court may modify the term of imprisonment “of a defendant who has been sentenced ... based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered!,]” if the amendment is listed in the Guidelines as retroactively applicable. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § lB1.10(a)(l), (d), p.s. (2016). Amendment 794 is not so listed. The district court therefore did not err in denying Barnes the relief he sought. *See United States v. Dunphy,*551 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th Cir. 2009); *United States v. McHan,*386 F.3d 620, 622-23 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. *See United States v. Barnes,*No. 4:10-cr-00074-RGD-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2017 & Mar. 27, 2017). *257We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
#### Cowser vs. Tatum.

A note payable to A. B. or Bearer, and endorsed in writing by tlio payoe to a third person, may pass by delivery, and the bolder may sue the makor in his own ñamo as such.

*Appeal f rom Union Cvreuit Court.*

lion. LeN B. Green, Circuit Judge.

Garland & Eandolpit, for appellant.

Mr. Justice Compton,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought by Tatum, the holder, against Cowser, the maker of a promissory note, payable to James Grambles or *hearer,*and transferred by endorsement in writing to William J. Locke.

It is insisted for Cowser, that although the note was transferable by delivery merely, and might have so passed to Locke, yet,-having been transferred to him by indorsement, it could not after-*14wards pass by delivery to Tatum so as to enable him to. sue in his own name. To this proposition we do not assent. It is the better opinion, both upon principle and by authority, that where *p*note, as in this case, is originally payable to bearer, and is indorsed, the holder may, as against the maker, declare upon it as bearer, or as indorsee, at his election. *(Story on Prom. Notes (4th ed.,) sec.*132; and if, as bearer, he' may sue the maker, no good reason is perceived why he may not, as bearer, transfer the note by delivery. The indorsement of such a note does not destroy its negotiability by delivery. The holder may, at his option, act either as indorsee, or as bearer, in suing the maker, or in transferring the note to a subsequent holder.

The principle in *Block vs. Walker,*2 *Ark.*4, has no application to this case. There, the instrument sued on was not a promissory note payable to bearer, but was a common money bond, which, under our statute, was transferable by assignment only.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 134A/3 ma

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 134A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 57.° anno3 maggio 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 134A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

57.° anno3 maggio 2014

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2014/C 134A/01 | Rettifica al bando di concorso generale — EPSO/AD/278/14 — Amministratori (AD 7) nei seguenti settori: 1. Informatica forense 2. Analisi operativa — (Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C 88 A del 27 marzo 2014) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2014/C 134A/01

Rettifica al bando di concorso generale — EPSO/AD/278/14 — Amministratori (AD 7) nei seguenti settori: 1. Informatica forense 2. Analisi operativa — (Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C 88 A del 27 marzo 2014)

(Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C 88 A del 27 marzo 2014)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 134A/02 | Cronistoria delle GU C A Concorsi | 2 |

2014/C 134A/02

Cronistoria delle GU C A Concorsi

2

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 3.5.2014 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 134/1

---

Rettifica al bando di concorso generale

EPSO/AD/278/14 — AMMINISTRATORI (AD 7)

nei seguenti settori:

| 1. | INFORMATICA FORENSE |
| --- | --- |

1.

INFORMATICA FORENSE

| 2. | ANALISI OPERATIVA |
| --- | --- |

2.

ANALISI OPERATIVA

(Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea
  C 88 A del 27 marzo 2014
  )

2014/C 134 A/01

A pagina 7, titolo VIII, punto 1:

anziché:

«Termine ultimo (compresa la convalida): 29 aprile 2014 alle ore 12 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles»,

leggi:

«Termine ultimo (compresa la convalida): 6 maggio 2014 alle ore 12 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles».

---

3.5.2014

| 3.5.2014 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 134/2

---

CRONISTORIA DELLE GU C A CONCORSI

2014/C 134 A/02

Si riporta qui di seguito l'elenco delle GU C A pubblicate nell'anno in corso.

Salvo indicazione contraria, le GU sono pubblicate in tutte le versioni linguistiche.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

---
M.T., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-394

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Granted. Dismissed.
#### Patrick CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-1855

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick O. Christian seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil *785complaint without prejudice. We may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). We conclude that the order Christian seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid, 807 F.3d 619 (4th Cir. 2015).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Christian to reinstate his case and file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the décisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Hershel ROSEBORO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-5578

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Steve      Shum                                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Steve      Shum                                                                 |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | June      9, 2009                                                               |
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2019

No. 04-18-00916-CV

Caleb ANKHAMEN,

Appellant

v.

VIEW AT ENCINO COMMONS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV04051

Honorable Timothy Johnson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due February 27, 2019. Neither the brief nor a motion for 

extension of time has been filed.

We order appellant, Caleb AnkhAmen, to file, by March 18, 2019, appellant’s brief 

and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. If appellant fails 

to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, the appeal may be dismissed for 

want of prosecution without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on 

this 7th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Thomas HIPPS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6201

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

John Thomas Hipps, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Michael Meinecke, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Thomas Hipps seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We - have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hipps has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*