alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of SED
International Holdings, Inc (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Philip Flynt, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                                                                      
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company, and for, the
    periods presented in this Report.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ PHILIP FLYNT       
| |                        
| | Philip Flynt           
| | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 17, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate document.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6635

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH EUGENE MCDANIEL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-111, CA-00-90-3-MU) Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth Eugene McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Eugene McDaniel appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (WestSupp. 2001) motion. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McDaniel , Nos. CR-94-111; CA-00-90-3-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 21, 2001; entered Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Marcus E. ENSLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4259

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed January 23, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 8025)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; Clinical Research Education and Career Development (CRECD) Program (R25-Independent Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         March 23, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Cancer Institute, Gateway Plaza, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryline Laude-Sharp, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Research Administration, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Ste. 525, MSC. 9206, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-9536,                         *mlaudesharp@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: February 7, 2022.

David W. Freeman,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-02919 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Reginald CLARK, Petitioner v. NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 14-1245

September Term, 2015

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Filed: 07/19/2016

Reginald Clark, Washington, DC, Pro Se.

Jaynie Randall Lilley, Mark B. Stem, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

BEFORE: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This petition for review of an order of the National Credit Union Administration Board (the “Board”) was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). Upon consideration of the foregoing and the motion for appointment of counsel, it is

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. Appointment of counsel is not warranted in this ease. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. Petitioner does not challenge the factual findings or legal conclusions in the Board’s October 23, 2014 decision. With respect to his procedural challenges, petitioner has not shown that the Board’s order continuing his hearing constitutes an amended rule triggering the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(b). The order was consistent with the Board’s authority under the Federal Credit Union Act (“FCUA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1751 et seq., as well as its power under the existing rules to “direct the performance of ... any act which could be done or ordered by the administrative law judge.” 12 C.F.R. § 747.4; Cf. Shalala v. Guernsey Mem’l Hosp., 514 U.S. 87, 100, 115 S.Ct. 1232, 131 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995) (notice and comment procedures are required where an agency adopts “a new position inconsistent with” an existing regulation, or “effects a substantive change in the regulation”). Furthermore, petitioner has failed to show that the Board’s January 2, 2009 order was “arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); see 12 C.F.R. § 747.29(b)(1) (providing that par*807ties may move for summary disposition “at any time” during an adjudicatory proceeding).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Richard V. PARIS, Appellant, v. Erica R. PARIS, Appellee.

No. 4D17-3280

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[May 17, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1772 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 30 ) IV-E- 5 Docket Number: 

# A-86-0 3

Printed 12/2/20089:45:11 AM

Sheet 30of 117P. 2

AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 / A\ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENCY 

### DE C 

## I \ ^ Pa-fc-Ol^ \j£-£ Ok>

OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Phon e Contact s Wit hTrad e Organization s FROM : TO : THRU : Charle s Moulis , Chemica l Enginee r . .., , . < Standard s Developmen t and Support . BEanc" h Docke t A-86-0 3 JohnF . Anderson, , Senio r Projec t Manage r Standar d Developmen t and Suppor t Branc h I n August , Septembe r and Octobe r o f thi s yea r I ha d phon e conversation s wit hsevera l trad e organization s (includin g th e Engin e Manufacturer s Association , th e America nPetroleum Institute , and th e PetroleumMarketer s Associatio no f America ) concernin g th e Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g (NPRM ) o nth e contro l o f sulfu r level s i n on-highwa ydiese l fuel . Manyo f th e conversation s deal t wit hschedulin g th e publi c hearin g t o allo wadeguat e tim e fo r th e preparatio no f meaningfu l and usefu l comments . Others , initiate d b yth e trad e organizations , serve d t o clarif yguestion s raise d i nrespons e t o th e NPRM , o r t o giv e EP Aadvanc e notic e o f comment s tha t wer e late r repeate d and expande d a t th e publi c hearing . 7912 W
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

_____________________________________________________________________________________

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of USA Truck, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Darron R. Ming, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | October 30, 2009 | By:    | /s/Darron R. Ming                                        |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | **Darron R. Ming**                                       |   |
|   |             |   | *Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer*** |   |
|   |             |   | * *                                                 |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to USA Truck, Inc. and will be retained by USA Truck, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00009

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1599236D

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### T AMIKA 

### F AYE 

### G RANT



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss her appeal. Because we have not yet decided

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: February 4, 2021
Laura Mae WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2796

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed March 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32 (b) Section 906 CFO Certification

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with  the  filing  of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter  Ended October 5, 2003 (the "Report") by Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc., the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Pomeroy IT Solutions, Inc.


                                       /s/ Michael E. Rohrkemper
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Michael E. Rohrkemper
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Pomeroy  IT  Solutions,  Inc.  and  will be retained by Pomeroy IT
Solutions,  Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
msbi_Current_Folio_Ex1029



		

			Exhibit 10.29

		





		
			AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIS AMENDMENT NO.  1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 15, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Midland States Bank, an Illinois banking corporation (the “Bank”,  hereinafter referred to as the “Employer”), and Jeffrey S. Mefford (“Executive”).
		

		
			 
		

		
			RECITALS
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 A.
			

			
	
			
			The Executive is currently employed as Executive Vice President,  Banking, of the Bank and has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Bank, dated as of December 1, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”).




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 B.
			

			
	
			
			The Chief Executive Officer of the Bank has recommended, and the Midland States Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) Compensation Committee has approved, changes to the target Incentive Bonus and long-term incentive bonus percentages for the Executive. 




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 C.
			

			
	
			
			Since the date of the Employment Agreement the SEC has requested that all issuer’s subject to the reporting requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 include a provision in the issuer’s employment agreements with respect certain rights of the employee to contact the SEC and other government agencies with respect to possible violations of the federal securities laws.




		
			 
		

		
			AGREEMENTS
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			The reference in Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement to a target Incentive Bonus is hereby amended to “not less than forty percent (40%)”; and a new sentence shall be added as follows: “The long-term incentive bonus percentage for the Executive shall be forty-five percent (45%).”




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			A new Section 8(g) is hereby added to the Employment Agreement as follows:




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 (g)
			

			
	
			
			Nothing contained herein shall impede Executive’s ability to communicate with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission or other governmental agencies regarding possible federal securities law violations (i) without the Company’s prior approval, and (ii) without having to forfeit or forgo any resulting whistleblower awards.”




		
			In all other respects the Employment Agreement shall remain fully in force and effect.
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.
		

		
			 
		

		
			MIDLAND STATES BANKJEFFREY MEFFORD
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			By:  /s/ Leon J. Holschbach    /s/ Jeffrey Mefford 
		

		
			Name:Leon J. Holschbach[Signature]
		

		
			Its:Chief Executive Officer
# Navy Identifies Reserve Sailor Who Died of COVID-19 Related Complications

## From Commander, Navy Reserve Force Public Affairs 

Richardson, 29, was assigned to the “Jaguars” of Helicopter Maritime Squadron SIX ZERO (HSM-60) at Naval Air Station Jacksonville.“The Jaguar family is deeply saddened by the loss of our friend and shipmate, PS1 Debrielle Richardson,” said Cmdr. Dan Jones, commanding officer of HSM-60. “Her tremendous positive spirit and exceptional work ethic have left an incredible legacy here at the squadron and our community. The Jaguars are proud to have served alongside her and will continue to support her family and our Sailors during this difficult time.”Anyone experiencing flu-like symptoms is encouraged to seek medical treatment immediately.For questions related to this release, please contact Commander, Navy Reserve Force Public Affairs Officer, Lt. Cmdr. Amber Lewis: 757-322-5652; Amber.J.Lewis4@navy.mil.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The BISYS Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for
the year ended June 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          39,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,146
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,415
<PP&E>                                          48,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,967
<BONDS>                                          1,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           496
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,061
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   765
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72<F1>
<FN>
We have calculated earnings per share amounts in accordance with FAS 128
"Earnings Per Share". We have entered basic and diluted amounts in place of
primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             119,202
<SECURITIES>                                        10,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                       58,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   233,956
<PP&E>                                             124,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     843,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              263,392
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,798
<OTHER-SE>                                         438,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       843,294
<SALES>                                            759,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   759,387
<CGS>                                              448,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      726,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 13,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        13,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06
        


</TABLE>