7098 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

1See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019–2020, 86 FR 

43168 (August 6, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Kingtom’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief of Kingtom 

Aluminio S.R.L.,’’ dated September 7, 2021. 

3See Global Aluminum Distributor, LLC’s Letter, 

‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China; A–570–967; Case Brief,’’ dated September 

7, 2021. 

4See JL Trading Corp., Puertas Y Ventanas JM 

Inc., and Industrias Feliciano Al Inc.’s Letter, 

‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China: Case Brief,’’ dated September 7, 2021. 

5See Hialeah Aluminum Supply, Inc. and Classic 

Metals Suppliers Corp.’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum 

Extrusions from China; Letter in Lieu of Case Brief,’’ 

dated September 7, 2021. 

6See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Rebuttal 

Brief,’’ dated September 16, 2021. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China, 2019–2020: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

November 17, 2021. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decisions 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China; 2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

9See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 

30650 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 

10See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 43171, and 

PDM at 15–17. 

11 Id. 

12See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

13See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). 

14See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 

56164, 56165 (October 21, 2019). 

15See Preliminary Results PDM at 11. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that sales of 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) were made at 

less than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) May 1, 2019, 

through April 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Flessner, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6312. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

These final results cover 87 companies 

for which an administrative review was 

initiated and not rescinded. On 

September 7, 2021, the following parties 

submitted case briefs: (1) Kingtom 

Aluminio S.R.L. (Kingtom); 2 (2) Global 

Aluminum Distributor, LLC; 3 and (3) JL 

Trading Corp., Puertas Y Ventanas JM 

Inc., and Industrias Feliciano Al Inc.4

Additionally, on September 7, 2021, 

Hialeah Aluminum Supply, Inc. and 

Classic Metals Suppliers Corp. filed a 

letter in lieu of a case brief.5 On 

September 16, 2021, the Aluminum 

Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (the 

petitioner) submitted a rebuttal brief.6

On November 17, 2021, Commerce 

extended the deadline for these final 

results until February 2, 2022.7

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). 

A complete summary of the events 

that occurred since publication of the 

Preliminary Results, as well as a full 

discussion of the issues raised by parties 

for these final results, may be found in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.8

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 9

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is aluminum extrusions, which 

are shapes and forms, produced by an 

extrusion process, made from aluminum 

alloys having metallic elements 

corresponding to the alloy series 

designations published by The 

Aluminum Association commencing 

with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or 

proprietary equivalents or other 

certifying body equivalents). A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues that parties raised and that we 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum follows as an appendix to 

this notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made no changes for these 

final results. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that none of the companies 

for which an administrative review was 

requested, and not withdrawn, was 

entitled to a separate rate. We therefore 

preliminarily determined that 85 

companies listed in Appendix III of the 

Preliminary Results were not eligible for 

a separate rate in this administrative 

review.10 For these final results of 

review, we have made no changes to our 

preliminary separate rate analysis 11 and 

continue to find that the 85 companies 

listed in Appendix II of this notice are 

not eligible for a separate rate in this 

administrative review. 

China-Wide Entity 

We continue to determine for these 

final results that the 85 companies listed 

in Appendix II are part of the Chinawide entity in this administrative 

review.12

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.13 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity in the 

instant review, and because Commerce 

did not self-initiate such a review, the 

entity is not under review, and the 

entity’s current rate (i.e., 86.01 

percent) 14 is not subject to change. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Anderson International 

and Sunvast Trade Shanghai did not 

have shipments of subject merchandise 

to the United States during the POR.15

As we received no information to 

contradict our preliminary 

determination of no shipments with 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 7099 

16See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Notice); 

see also ‘‘Assessment’’ section, below. 

17See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

18See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

respect to these two companies, we 

continue to find that they made no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR. 

Accordingly, we will issue appropriate 

instructions for these two companies 

that are consistent with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ clarification.16

Adjustments for Countervailable 

Subsidies 

Because no company established 

eligibility for an adjustment under 

section 777A(f) of the Act for 

countervailable domestic subsidies, for 

these final results, Commerce did not 

make an adjustment pursuant to section 

777A(f) of the Act for countervailable 

domestic subsidies for separate-rate 

recipients. Furthermore, because the 

China-wide entity is not under review, 

we made no adjustment for 

countervailable export subsidies for the 

China-wide entity pursuant to section 

772(c)(1)(C) of the Act. 

Assessment 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

will determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. Consistent with its recent 

notice,17 Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). These 

final results of review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise under 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Consistent with Commerce’s assessment 

practice in non-market economy cases, 

where we have determined that an 

exporter under review had no 

shipments of subject merchandise, any 

suspended entries that entered under 

the exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

China-wide rate.18

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that received a separate rate 

in a prior segment of this proceeding, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the exporter-specific rate published for 

the most-recently completed segment of 

this proceeding in which the exporter 

was reviewed; (2) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not been found to be entitled to a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that established for the China-wide 

entity (3) for all non-Chinese exporters 

of subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter (or, if unidentified, 

that of the China-wide entity); and (4) 

for the China-wide entity, the cash 

deposit rate will be 86.01 percent. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction or return of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the destruction or return 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Enforce and Protect Act 

(EAPA) Determinations and Due Process 

Comment 2: Separate Rate 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—Companies Not Entitled 

to a Separate Rate 

1. Allpower Display Co., Ltd 

2. Amidi Zhuhai 

3. Beauty Sky Technology Co. Ltd 

4. Changshu Changsheng Aluminum 

Products Co., Ltd 

5. Chenming Industry and Commerce 

Shouguang Co., Ltd. 

6. China International Freight Co. Ltd 

7. China State Decoration Group Co., Ltd. 

8. CRRC Changzhou Auto Parts Co. Ltd * 

9. Custom Accessories Asia Ltd. 

10. Everfoison Industry Ltd. 

11. Foshan City Fangyuan Ceramic 

12. Foshan City Nanhai Yongfeng Aluminum 

13. Foshan City Top Deal Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

14. Foshan Gold Bridge Import and Export 

Co. Ltd. 

15. Foshan Golden Promise Import and 

Export Co., Ltd. 

16. Foshan Guangshou Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

17. Foshan Xingtao Aluminum Profile Co., 

Ltd. 

18. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Inc. 

19. Fujian Minfa Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

20. Fuzhou Ruifuchang Trading Co., Ltd. 

21. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

22. Gebruder Weiss 

23. Gold Bridge International 

24. Grupo Emb 

25. Grupo Europeo La Optica 

26. Grupo Pe No Mato In 

27. Guangdong Gaoming Guangtai Shicai 

28. Guangdong Gaoxin Communication 

Equipment Industrial Co., Ltd. 

29. Guangdong Golden China Economy 

30. Guangdong Maoming Foreign Trade 

Enterprise Development Co. 

31. Guangdong Taiming Metal Products Co., 

LTD. 

32. Guangdong Victor Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

33. Guangzhou Jintao Trade Company 

34. Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7100 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

1See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Petitions for the 

Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties on Barium Chloride from India,’’ dated 

January 12, 2022 (the Petition). 

2 Id. 

3See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petitions for the 

Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties on Imports of Barium Chloride from India: 

Supplemental Questions,’’ dated January 14, 2022; 

and ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping 

Duties on Imports of Barium Chloride from India: 

Supplemental Questions,’’ dated January 14, 2022; 

see also Commerce’s Memoranda, ‘‘Petition for the 

Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of 

Barium Chloride from India: Phone Call with 

Counsel to the Petitioner,’’ dated January 24, 2022; 

and ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Barium 

Chloride from India: Phone Call with Counsel to the 

Petitioner,’’ dated January 24, 2022. 

4See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Barium Chloride from 

India: Response to Supplemental Questionnaire on 

Volume I of Petition (General Issues and Injury 

Information),’’ dated January 19, 2022 (General 

Issues Supplement); ‘‘Barium Chloride from India: 

Response to Supplemental Questionnaire on 

Volume II (AD) of Petition,’’ dated January 20, 2022 

(India AD Supplement); ‘‘Barium Chloride from 

India: Response to Supplemental Question on 

Volume I of Petition (General Issues and Injury 

Information),’’ dated January 25, 2022 (Revised 

Exhibit I–4); and ‘‘Barium Chloride from India: 

Response to Supplemental Question on Volume II 

of Petition (Antidumping Duties),’’ dated January 

25, 2022 (Second India AD Supplement). 

5See infra, section on ‘‘Determination of Industry 

Support for the Petition.’’ 

6See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 

Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) 

(Preamble). 

7See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ‘‘factual 

information’’). 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

35. Hangzhou Tonny Electric and Tools Co., 

Ltd. 

36. Hefei Sylux Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

37. Hong Kong Dayo Company, Ltd. 

38. Huazhijie Plastic Products 

39. Huiqiao International Shanghai 

40. Ilshim Almax 

41. Jer Education Technology 

42. Jiangsu Weatherford Hongda Petroleum 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

43. Jiangsu Yizheng Haitian Aluminum 

Industrial 

44. Jiang Yin Ming Ding Aluminum & Plastic 

Products Co., Ltd 

45. Jilin Qixing Aluminum Industries Co., 

Ltd. 

46. Jin Lingfeng Plastic Electrical Appliance 

47. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co. 

Ltd. 

48. Kingtom Aluminio SRL 

49. Larkcop International Co Ltd 

50. Ledluz Co Ltd 

51. Liansu Group Co. Ltd 

52. Links Relocations Beijing 

53. Marshell International 

54. Ningbo Deye Inverter Technology 

55. Ningbo Hightech Development 

56. Ningbo Winjoy International Trading 

57. Orient Express Container 

58. Ou Chuang Plastic Building Material 

(Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 

59. Pentagon Freight Service 

60. Pro Fixture Hong Kong 

61. Qingdao Sea Nova Building 

62. Qingdao Yahe Imports and Exports 

63. Sewon 

64. Shandong Huajian Aluminum Industry 

65. Shanghai EverSkill M&E Co., Ltd. 

66. Shanghai Jingxin Logistics 

67. Shanghai Ouma Crafts Co, Ltd. 

68. Shanghai Phidix Trading 

69. Sinogar Aluminum 

70. Transwell Logistics Co., Ltd. 

71. United Aluminum 

72. Wanhui Industrial China 

73. Wenzhou Yongtai Electric Co., Ltd. 

74. Winstar Power Technology Limited 

75. Wisechain Trading Ltd. 

76. Wuxi Lotus Essence 

77. Wuxi Rapid Scaffolding Engineering 

78. Wuxi Zontai Int’l Corporation Ltd. 

79. Xuancheng Huilv Aluminum Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

80. Yekalon Industry Inc 

81. Yonn Yuu Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

82. Yuyao Royal Industrial 

83. Zhejiang Guoyao Aluminum Co., Ltd. 

84. Zhongshan Broad Windows and Doors 

and Curtain 

85. ZL Trade Shanghai 

[FR Doc. 2022–02639 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–908] 

Barium Chloride From India: Initiation 

of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable February 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker or Preston Cox; AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2924 or (202) 482–5041, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petition 

On January 12, 2022, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) received an 

antidumping duty (AD) petition 

concerning imports of barium chloride 

from India, filed in proper form on 

behalf of Chemical Products 

Corporation (the petitioner), a domestic 

producer of barium chloride.1 The 

Petition was accompanied by a 

countervailing duty (CVD) petition 

concerning imports of barium chloride 

from India.2

On January 14 and 24, 2022, 

Commerce requested supplemental 

information pertaining to certain aspects 

of the Petition.3 The petitioner filed 

responses to these requests on January 

19, 20, and 25, 2022.4

In accordance with section 732(b) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), the petitioner alleges that imports 

of barium chloride from India are being, 

or are likely to be, sold in the United 

States at less than fair value (LTFV) 

within the meaning of section 731 of the 

Act, and that imports of such products 

are materially injuring, or threatening 

material injury to, the barium chloride 

industry in the United States. Consistent 

with section 732(b)(1) of the Act, the 

Petition is accompanied by information 

reasonably available to the petitioner 

supporting its allegations. 

Commerce finds that the petitioner 

filed the Petition on behalf of the 

domestic industry, because the 

petitioner is an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. 

Commerce also finds that the petitioner 

demonstrated sufficient industry 

support for the initiation of the 

requested AD investigation.5

Period of Investigation 

Because the Petition was filed on 

January 12, 2022, the period of 

investigation (POI) for this AD 

investigation is January 1, 2021, through 

December 31, 2021, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.204(b)(1). 

Scope of the Investigation 

The product covered by this 

investigation is barium chloride from 

India. For a full description of the scope 

of this investigation, see the appendix to 

this notice. 

Comments on the Scope of the 

Investigation 

As discussed in the Preamble to 

Commerce’s regulations, we are setting 

aside a period for interested parties to 

raise issues regarding product coverage 

(i.e., scope).6 Commerce will consider 

all comments received from interested 

parties and, if necessary, will consult 

with interested parties prior to the 

issuance of the preliminary 

determination. If scope comments 

include factual information,7 all such 

factual information should be limited to 

public information. To facilitate 

preparation of its questionnaire, 

Commerce requests that all interested 

parties submit scope comments by 5:00 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES