alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.20


AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.
UNFUNDED BENEFIT PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016)


Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2016) (the "Plan"), effective as of January 1, 2018.  Words used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.


Section 1


Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“Section 5.1    Earnings.


(a)In General.  Except as otherwise described in the Plan, for Plan Years commencing on and after January 1, 2018, at the end of each calendar month during a Plan Year through the end of the month prior to the payment date, the Account of the Covered Employees shall be credited with an amount determined by multiplying such Participant’s average Sub-Account balance during such month by 2%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the True-Up Interest Rate determined for such Plan Year exceeds the rate credited under the preceding sentence to the Covered Employee’s Account, such Account shall retroactively be credited with the excess (if any) of (i) the amount determined under the preceding sentence over (ii) the amount determined by multiplying the Participant's Account balance during each month of such Plan Year by the True-Up Interest Rate determined for such Plan Year, compounded monthly. If a Participant incurs a Termination of Employment, this True-Up Interest Rate calculation shall be made during the month in which the Participant incurs such Termination of Employment and shall be based on the year-to-date True-Up Interest Rate for the month ending prior to the date the Participant incurs a Termination of Employment, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. For any subsequent month following such Termination of Employment, the True-Up Interest Rate calculation shall not apply.


(b)Prior Plan Years.  Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, any interest credited to a Participant’s Account with respect to 2017 or prior Plan Years will be provided under the terms and conditions of the Plan as it existed on December 31, 2017.”


EXECUTED this 28th day of December, 2018.


                    
HYSTER-YALE GROUP, INC.


By:    /s/ Amy E. Gerbick
Amy E. Gerbick
Title:    Associate General Counsel, 
Director of Corporate Compliance
and Assistant Secretary
Minister Mintstre 

of Agriculture and de l'Agnculture et de 

Agri-Food l'Agroalimentaire 

and Minister for the et ministre de la 

Canadian Wheal Board Commission canadienne du ble 

Ottawa, Canada K1A oes 

Quote: 157505 JAN 312011 

Ms. Lisa Jackson 

Administrator 

Environmental Protection Agency 

riel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

USA 

Dear Ms. Jackson: 

I am writing to you today in regard to the submission of the Government of Canada's petition on 

the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard program aggregate compliance approach for renewable 

biomass. 

As the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, I hereby confl1l11 that the petition and all of the 

supporting data have been reviewed and verified by officials in my depaliment who have 

primary expertise in agricultural land-use patterns and practices, as well as the Agriculture 

Division of Statistics Canada, the agency within the Government of Canada that specializes in 

collection, analysis and dissemination of data and statistics relating to agricultural land-usc 

patterns and practices (Statistics Canada certificate is enclosed). Taken together, this data and 

information supports the finding that planted crops and crop residue from Canada meet the 

definition of renewable biomass, and will continue to do so in the future. To this end, the 

Agriculture Division of Statistics Canada, in collaboration with Agriculture and Agri-Food 

Canada officials, will review, verify and submit data to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) on an annual basis to facilitate the EPA's annual evaluation of Canada's 

agricultural land use vis-a-vis the 2007 baseline area of land specified in our petition. 

The approval of Canada's petition in a timely manner is important to the competitiveness of the 

biodiesel industry and the jobs they support-including several plants in the U.S.-that rely on 

Canadian canola as a feedstock. While we appreciate that petitions must be subject to proper 

analysis and review, as well as 60 days of public comment, we are concerned by indications that 

the EPA petition approval process could take six months or longer to complete. I therefore 

request that the EPA expedite the review of Canada's petition in order to minimize furiher harm 

to our industries. 

.. ./2 

Canada
 
\tls. Lisa Jackson Page 2 

We look forward to continued collaboration and co-operation with you and your officials on this 

issue. [ have also enclosed a copy of our petition for your review and approval. 

Sincerely, 

Ge~t:::fI

Enclosures 

c.c.: The Honourable Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture 

Ms. Margo Oge, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Environmental 

Protection Agency
Exhibit 3.2

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF THE

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

FOSSIL, INC.

Fossil, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Company), does hereby certify:

FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Company duly adopted a resolution
proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company:

Paragraph 1 of Article IV is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

The aggregate number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 101,000,000 shares,
consisting of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (Preferred Stock), and 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock).

SECOND: The amendment of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

The effective
time of the amendment herein certified shall be upon filing with the Delaware Secretary of State.

Signed and attested to on May 25,
2000.



FOSSIL, INC.By:

/s/ T.R. TunnellPrint Name:

T.R. TunnellTitle:

Senior Vice President, Development
Chief Legal Officer & Secretary




|        |  |                 
|------- |  | ----------------
|ATTEST:
|        | 
|By:     |  | /s/ Lisa Lapiska
|Name:   |  | LISA LAPISKA    
|Title:  |  | VP - HR
Exhibit
4.4

    


    [Rurban
Financial Corp. Letterhead]

    


    March 19,
2009

    


    Securities
and Exchange Commission

    100 F
Street, NE

    Washington,
D.C. 20549

    


    
      
        	
              	
                Re:

              	
                Rurban
      Financial Corp. – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2008

              


      

    

    


    Ladies
and Gentlemen:

    


    Rurban Financial Corp., an Ohio
corporation (“Rurban”), is today filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commision (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rurban for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 ( “Rurban’s 2008 Form 10-K”)

    


    Pursuant to the instructions relating
to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Rurban hereby agrees
to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of
its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to Rurban’s
2008 Form 10-K.  None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total
assets of Rurban and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

    


    
      
        	 
      	
                Very
      truly yours,

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                RURBAN
      FINANCIAL CORP.

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                /s/
      Duane L. Sinn

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                Duane
      L. Sinn

              
	 
      	
                Executive
      Vice President and

              
	 
      	
                Chief
      Financial Officer
EX PARTE NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC.

1160061

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 17, 2017

Mand. pet. denied.
Steven Jonathan DOBISH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed April 10, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Appleby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tasker Capital Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

         (b)  evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

         (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

April 15, 2005

/s/ Robert Appleby
-----------------------------
Robert Appleby
Chief Executive Officer
Phyllis MURO, etc., Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 3D17-1765

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach); Schlesinger Law Offices, P.A., and Jonathan Gdanski (Fort Lauderdale) and Brittany Chambers (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

King & Spalding LLP, and William L. Durham II (Atlanta, GA), and Val Leppert (Atlanta, GA); Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, and Frank Cruz-Alvarez ; Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, and Geoffrey J. Michael (Washington, DC), for appellees.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Hall v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.*, 118 So.3d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (concluding: "In short, this is an Orange County case which belongs in Orange County") (citing *Della-Donna v. Gore Newspaper Co.*, 390 So.2d 87, 87-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (concluding: " 'In sum, this is a Broward County case, which belongs *1011in Broward County") (additional citations omitted) ).
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY-ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Ivanovick, Chief Financial Officer of RecycleNet and subsidiaries, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of RecycleNet and subsidiaries.



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|March 19, 2004 | /s/  Rick Ivanovick    
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               | Rick Ivanovick         
|               | Chief Financial Officer
# From Ross.Philipepamail.epa.gov 

# Sent Thursday 

# November 13 2008 

# 839 

# PM

# GMT To Boucher Michael 

# mbouchermckennalong 

# com Cc Edwards.Dennisepamail.epa.gov Subject 

# ReYour courier address

Please send 

# mycopy in the

### package you send to 

### Dennis Edwards and also please send 

## me pdfcopy at 

### ross.philipepa.gov
Thanks

Philip 

### Ross United States Environmental Protection 

### Agency Office of General Counsel Pesticides and Toxic Substances 

## Law Office 

### 202-564-5637



## Boucher Michael 

## mboucher@mckenn To along.com Philip

## Ross/DC/USEPA/US@EPA cc 11/13/2008 

## 0247 

# PM Subject 

### Your courier address



## Wouldyou kindly send it to

# me Thank 

## you


# McKENNA LONG ALDRIDGE LLP Attorneys at

## Law

Michael Boucher 1900 Street 

# NW Suite 100 

## Tel

# 202 496-7729 Washington 

## D.C 20006-1102 

## Fax

# 202 496-7756 United States of 

### America Cell 

# 202 306-1645 

## Tel

# 202 496-7500 

## mbouchermckennalong com http//www.mckennalong.com 

# ALBANY ATLANTA BRUSSELS DENVER LOS

# ANGELES 

# NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA 

# SAN DIEGO SANFRANCISCO WASHINGTONJ D.C

CONFIDENTIALITY 

# NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments contain information 

### from the 

### law firm of

## McKenna Long Aldridge 

# LLP and are intended solely forthe use of the 

### named recipient or recipients This e-mail 

## may contain privileged attorney/client 

### communications or

### work product 

## Any dissemination of this e-mail 

### by anyone other than an intended recipient is strictly prohibited If

### you are not 

### named recipient 

### you are prohibited 

### from any further viewing of the e-mail or any attachments or

### from making any use of the e-mail or attachments If

### you believe 

### you have received this e-mail in error notify the sender immediately 

### and permanently delete the e-mail any attachments 

### and all copies thereof 

### from any drives or storage 

### media and destroy any printouts of the e-mail or attachments
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF PERIODIC REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, Troy E. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant , certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained
in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|Date: October 29, 2003 |  | /s/ Troy E. Lynch                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  | Troy E. Lynch Chief Executive Officer



In connection with this annual report
on Form 10-K of eOn Communications Corporation (Registrant) I, Lanny N. Lambert, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant , certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.



|Date: October 29, 2003 |  | /s/ Lanny N. Lambert                    
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                       |  | Lanny N. Lambert Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Annual Report of RecycleNet Corporation, (the “Company”) on
10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard R. Ivanovick Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


March
      31, 2008
            /s/
      Richard R. IvanovickRichard
      R. IvanovickChief
      Financial Officer
Joseph Harvey GAUTREAUX, et al. v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INS. CO.

NO. 2018-CC-0575

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                 UROLOGIX, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                             September 30,
                                                      -------------------------
                                                          1996          1995
<S>                                                   <C>           <C> 
Net loss                                              $(1,789,685)  $(1,427,394)
                                                      ===========   ===========
Weighted average common shares outstanding (1)          9,128,765     5,224,251

Effect of cheap shares issued (2)                               -       784,234
                                                      -----------   -----------
                                                        9,128,765     6,008,485
                                                      ===========   ===========
Loss per common share                                      $(0.20)       $(0.24)
                                                      ===========   ===========
</TABLE> 


(1)  All shares of preferred stock which were converted to common stock in
conjunction with the initial public offering have been included in the
calculation of weighted average common shares as if converted for all periods
presented.

(2)  All preferred shares issued and options granted from April 5, 1995 to April
4, 1996 are included in the calculation for periods prior to the initial public
offering presented in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 4(D).
Martha PAREDES and Jose Antonio Paza, Appellants, v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D17-1290

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed May 30, 2018.

Philip D. Parrish, P.A., and Philip D. Parrish ; Simon Trial Firm, and Ronald M. Simon, Ronald M. Simon, Miami, for appellants.

Law Offices of Charles M-P George, and Charles M-P George ; Chartwell Law Offices, and William H. Edwards, Miami, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, Martha Paredes and Jose Antonio Paza, appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. Because the record reveals the existence of genuine issues of material fact on the issue, we reverse the portion of the summary judgment that found Whole Foods had no constructive knowledge of an alleged transitory substance upon which Ms. Paredes fell while shopping at Whole Foods. We affirm, however, the trial court's denial of appellants' requested negative inference instruction based on appellants' spoliation of evidence claim.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded for further proceedings.