alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 3, 2022.

# PLACE:

 The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 27, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-02063 Filed 1-27-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Rick P. Frier, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Rick P. Frier                           
|Rick P. Frier                               
|Executive Vice President and                
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|November 9, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jacob Vincent GREEN-BRESSLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10263

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*546Submitted March 8, 2017 *

Filed March 14, 2017

Robert Lally Miskell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU—Office of the US Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Thomas Scott Hartzell, Attorney, T.S. Hartzell, Attorney at Law, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jacob Vincent Green-Bressler appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Green-Bressler contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court acted within its discretion when it denied Green-Bressler a sentence reduction based on his criminal history and his role in the offense. *See*U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(B); *United States v. Dunn,*728 F.3d 1151, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2013). Further, insofar as Green-Bressler challenges the presentence reports, this claim is not cognizable. *See Dillon v. United States,*560 U.S. 817, 831, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (alleged sentencing errors are “outside the scope of the proceeding authorized by § 3582(c)(2)”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FILED AS
PART OF THE APACHE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,193
<SECURITIES>                                     1,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (513)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,245
<PP&E>                                           3,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,553)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,256
<BONDS>                                             78
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,807
<SALES>                                          7,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,903
<CGS>                                            2,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,694)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.37)
        

</TABLE>
#### Terry ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY JAIL; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-55741

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 14, 2017 *

Filed March 1, 2017

Terry Alexander, Pro Se

Elise Hur, Attorney, Nelson *&*Fulton, Henry Patrick Nelson, Esquire, Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee J. Bleau

*573Elise Hur, Attorney, Nelson *&*Fulton, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Zasorin

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terry Alexander appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. *Williams v. Paramo,*775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Alexander’s claims related to (1) the failure to approve him as a wheelchair user, and (2) the denial of a wheelchair and a cell complaint with the Americans with Disabilities Act while in solitary confinement, because Alexander failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he properly exhausted administrative remedies or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 90, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (“[Pjroper exhaustion of administrative remedies ... means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (emphasis, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)); *Williams,*775 F.3d at 1191 (a prisoner who does not exhaust administrative remedies must show that “there is something particular in his case that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies effectively unavailable to him.... ”).

We reject as meritless Alexander’s contentions that the district court did not properly manage the discovery process and failed to take judicial notice of non-party inmates’ assertions.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Brion Umidi, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen Biologics, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and15d — 15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 11, 2005         By:                      /s/ BRION UMIDI    Name:  Brion Umidi    Title:  *Chief Financial Officer*  
37
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Arrayit Corporation(the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Rene A. Schena certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/  Rene
A. Schena





Rene A.
Schena


Chief
Financial Officer




April 15,
2009
Exhibit 10.26

April 15, 1999

Janex International, Inc.

Gentlemen:

In connection with the re-issuance of our report on our audit of the 1997
financial statements of Janex International, Inc. ("Janex" or the "Company"),
and our consent to the inclusion of such report in the Company's Form 10-KSB and
its ongoing filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, you agree to
indemnify and hold BDO Seidman, LLP, ("BDO") harmless from any and all
liabilities, costs or expenses of any nature whatsoever, including legal fees
incurred by us in defending ourselves in a lawsuit brought because of such
re-issuance.

BDO agrees that it will promptly notify Janex of any filed or threatened claim
within ten (10) days of such threat or receipt of notice of the commencement of
an action. BDO further agrees that Janex may assume the defense of any such
action with counsel reasonably satisfactory to BDO to be chosen by Janex. After
such notice, Janex will not be liable to BDO for any legal fees subsequently
incurred by BDO unless counsel employed by Janex to represent BDO reasonably
concludes that there exists a conflict of interest that prevents such counsel
from representing BDO.

Such indemnification is void and any advanced funds will be returned to Janex if
a court, after adjudication, finds us liable for malpractice.

Very truly yours,

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP

The foregoing is accepted:

By: /s/ Fred B. Gretsch                                     Date: April 28, 1999
Its: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,650,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                432,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             488,596,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     57,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       214,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,965,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               488,596,000
<SALES>                                    355,851,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              323,459,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             29,521,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,360,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         18,161,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                18,161,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00895]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

State Energy Advisory Board; Notice of Open Teleconference

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, February 19th 2015 from 3:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (ET). 
To receive the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's 
Designated Federal Officer at the address or phone number listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Neukomm, Policy Advisor, Office 
of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, 
1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585. Phone number 202-287-
5189, and email moinca.neukomm@ee.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Receive STEAB Task Force updates on action items 
and revised objectives for FY 2015, discuss follow-up discussion 
opportunities and engagement with EERE staff who participated in the 
January meeting, discuss upcoming FY 2015 Board meetings, and receive 
updates on member activities within their states.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Monica Neukomm at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site at: 
www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 14, 2015.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00895 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                 Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
          Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
          (in  thousands,  except  per  share  amounts)

                                            Quarter  Ended
                                                  April  5,   
                                            ------------------
                                               1998      1999 
                                            ---------  -------

<S>                                           <C>      <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common shares
outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   11,392   11,692
                                            =========  =======
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $ 4,277  $ 5,068
                                            =========  =======
Net income per common share. . . . . . . . .  $  0.38  $  0.43
                                            =========  =======
DILUTED
Weighted average common shares
outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   11,392   11,692

Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding
during the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . .      319      166

Total common and common equivalent          ---------  -------
shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   11,711   11,858
                                            =========  =======
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $ 4,277  $ 5,068
                                            =========  =======
Net income per common share. . . . . . . . .  $  0.37  $  0.43
                                            =========  =======
</TABLE>