alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEST DATA REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT P-10-0231 Post-Focus Draft Revision 4 6/8/2011 ENGINEER: Avcin \ CLM \ JAS \ EV \ JAS PV (kg/yr): 22500 Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: USE: Electrical insulating varnish for motors, generators , transformers.

OTHER USES: MSDS : Yes LABEL : N o Gen Eqpt: Exhaust ventilation. Use in a well ventilated area. Local mechanical ventilation. // Rubber gloves. N eoprene gloves. // Splash goggles. Face shield. Respirator: Use approved NIOSH respiratory protection if TLV exceeded, or overexposure is likely. Health Effects: Irritation of the mouth, throat, and stomach. May cause pulmonary edema. // May cause an allergic skin reaction. Contains a component which is a known or suspected skin sensitizer. // May cause mild eye irritation. TLV/PEL : - none established CRSS: (3/8/2010): Chemical Name: S-H2O: 0.0528 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use SAT (concerns): (3/9/2010):Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases: Migration to groundwater: Moderate PBT rating: P 2 B 1 T 1 - Health: 1 Eco: 2, Water (All releases to water with a CC = 52 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: N R NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS :

P2 REC: EXPOSURE -BASED REVIEW: N o (0 criteria met)P-10-0231 Use: Electrical insulating varnish Number of Sites/Location: Basis: Process Description:


## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.

High End: to: from: basis:


## RELEASE TOTAL kg/y r -


## OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:P-10-0231 Manufacturing/Formulation Number of Sites/Location: Basis: Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Conservative : to : from: basis:



## RELEASE TOTAL kg/y r -


## OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Catalina Marketing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, L. Dick Buell, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ L. Dick Buell                                                 
|L. Dick Buell                                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|November 9, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,305,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,203,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                291,004,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             341,373,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       57,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       209,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  93,100,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               341,373,000
<SALES>                                     55,512,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,577,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,257,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,256,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,001,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,001,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.01**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Norman D. Smith, certify that:

 

1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zamba Corporation;

 

2.   Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I, are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | May 14,  2004                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Norman  D. Smith                   |   |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

[LETTERHEAD]


                             September 22, 1997





VIA FACSIMILE AND HAND DELIVERY

Mr. John Solberg
Vice President - Real Estate
OPUS NORTHWEST LLC
200 - 112th Avenue N.E.
Suite 205
Bellevue, WA 98004

Re:     Bend - High Desert Village

Dear John:

As you know our respective companies have been unable to agree on the terms of
an extension amendment to the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement dated June
24, 1997 between us and our 90 day Contingency Period in Section 4.5 expires
today.

We decline to satisfy or waive the contingencies in Sections 4.3 and 4.4 and the
Agreement is therefore terminated without further action.

As provided in the Agreement, the Deposit, with interest, is to be refunded to
us.  We are, by copy of this letter, so notifying First American Title Insurance
Company of Oregon and ask for your cooperation in getting a speedy return of our
money.

We regret not being able to pursue this project further and wish you well in
your own endeavors.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ Richard T. Takata
                                             ---------------------------
                                        Its: President and C.E.O.
                                             ---------------------------

PWG:dw

Copy to:  Opus U.S. Corporation              William N. Moloney
          Attn:  Legal Department            Attorney for Eagle
          800 Opus Center                    5711 N.E. Tolo Road
          9900 Bren Road East                Bainbridge Island, WA  98110
          Minnetonka, MN  55343
                                             First American Title Insurance
          Tousley Brain PLLC                 Company of Oregon
          Attn:  Russell F. Tousley, P.S.    Regional Commercial Division
          56th Floor, Key Tower              200 S.W. Market Street, Suite 1776
          700 Fifth Avenue                   Portland, OR  97201-5786
          Seattle, WA  98104-5056            Escrow #:   97160552


<PAGE>

RECEIVED EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN, INC. LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 1997
RE:  BEND - HIGH DESERT VILLAGE




BY:  /s/ John Solberg
   ---------------------------

DATED:    9/22/97                       TIME:  11:35 A.M.
      ------------------------               --------------------
Exhibit 32.1

                         RULE 13a - 14(b) CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Glacier Water  Services,  Inc., (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  ended  July 3,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian H.
McInerney,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial  condition of the Company as of the
          dates  indicated  and  results of  operations  of the  Company for the
          periods indicated.


/s/   Brian H. McInerney
      ------------------

Brian H. McInerney
President and Chief Executive Officer
July 29, 2005
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of INCA Designs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on October 18, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Stacy Josloff, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
              Stacy
              JosloffStacy Josloff
              Chief Executive Officer
              October 18, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be
      retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
D.G. v. STATE

CR-15-1277

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Delio ROMANES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4917

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:01-cv-00116-SSB-TSH Document 122-3 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 14 of 14
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2) of CytRx Corporation of our report dated February 27, 1998,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of CytRx Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of CytRx Corporation
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, as of the date of our report referred to in the preceding
paragraph, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-48706 and 333-37171 pertaining to the CytRx
Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, No. 33-93816 pertaining to the CytRx
Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan, and No. 33-93818 pertaining to the CytRx
Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan, and on Form S-3 Nos. 33-93820, 333-39607,
333-44043 and 333-48837 and the related Prospectuses, of our report dated
February 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2) of CytRx Corporation.


                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
June 17, 1998
Rogelio MENDEZ, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4052

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

Rogelio Mendez, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See**Ey v. State*, 982 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2008) ; *Mendez v. State*, 229 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); *Mendez v. State*, 190 So. 3d 71 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (table decision); *McDonald v. State*, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ; *Hughes v. State*, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Chandler v. State*, 1 So. 3d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; *Waiter v. State*, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; *Bizzell v. State*, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; *Gusow v. State*, 6 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Juan Isaias REY a/k/a Juan I. Rey and Maira Maria Igarza a/k/a Maira M. Igarza, Appellants, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee on Behalf of the Holders of the CSMC Mortgage-Backed Pass Through Certificates, Series 2007-7, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1492

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed May 8, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 12, 2018

Kelley A. Bosecker, St. Petersburg, for Appellants.

William L. Grimsley and Joseph A. Apatov, of McGlinchey Stafford, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

*410AFFIRMED. *See**Bennett v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.*, 124 So.3d 320 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding bank could rely on statutory presumption of validity of signatures on allonge, based on section 673.3081(1), Florida Statutes, in absence of any evidence from mortgagors that signature was unauthorized).

PALMER, ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6047 

To require the Postal Service to implement recommendations from the Inspector General of the United States Postal Service for improving identification and notification of undelivered and partially delivered routes, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Ms. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To require the Postal Service to implement recommendations 

from the Inspector General of the United States Postal 

Service for improving identification and notification of 

undelivered and partially delivered routes, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POSTAL SERVICE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT 

4 CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE IN5 SPECTOR GENERAL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Postal Service shall review 

7 and, to the extent practicable, implement the recVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:51 Oct 26, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6047.IH H6047
2 

•HR 6047 IH

1 ommendations of the Inspector General of the United 

2 States Postal Service with respect to undelivered and par3 tially delivered routes contained in the report set forth by 

4 the Inspector General entitled ‘‘Delivery Operations—Un5 delivered and Partially Delivered Routes’’ (Report Num6 ber 21–262–R23) and dated December 16, 2022. 

7 (b) DEADLINE.—The Postal Service shall implement 

8 the recommendations described in subsection (a) not later 

9 than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
mbamendforemployeeopt.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    EXHIBIT
1

     

    EMPLOYEE
OPTION TERMS (amended December 3, 2008)

     

    Name of
Grantee:                                                                Michael
Bozora

     

    Date of
Grant:                                                                January
1, 2006

     

    Number of
Shares
Granted:                                                                           1,476,651

     

    Exercise
Price:                                                      $0.01625

     

    Type of
Option

    (Qualified
or
Non-Qualified):                                                                           Non-Qualified

    


    Vesting:                                                      492,217
shares have vested prior to December 3, 2008

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              984,434
      shares have vested on December 3,
2008

            


    

     

    


     

    


     

    Amendment
of Option Terms agreed to by Grantee:

     

    


     

    _/s/ Michael
Bozora______________________________

     

    Print
Name: Michael Bozora
#### Anthony C. PARRISH and Peter J. Hebert, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ray MABUS, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-15228

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 24, 2017 * Honolulu, Hawaii

Filed March 09, 2017

Jerry P.S. Chang, Alston Hunt Floyd *&*Ing, Honolulu, HI, Clayton Ikei, Law Office of Clayton C. Ikei, A Law Corporation, Honolulu, HI, Jefferson Stanley Willard, *621The Law Office of Jefferson S. Willard, LLLC, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Charles W. Scarborough, Esquire, DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee

Before: KOZINSKI, HAWKINS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants Anthony Parrish and Peter Hebert (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal the adverse grant of summary judgment on their Title VII race discrimination and retaliation claims. We affirm.

Summary judgment was properly granted on all claims involving adverse employment actions due to the revocation of Plaintiffs’ security clearances because we lack the ability to review the merits of a decision to grant or revoke a security clearance. *Dep’t of the Navy v. Egan,*484 U.S. 518, 527-29, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988). In conducting a Title VII analysis, it is “impossible for the court to establish in the first place whether the [Defendant’s] proffered reasons were legitimate without evaluating their merits.” *Brazil v. U.S. Dep’t of the Navy,*66 F.3d 193, 197 (9th Cir. 1995). Even if the failure to follow normal agency procedures were circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent, in order to evaluate the Title VII claims we would still need to weigh the merits of the proffered nondiscriminatory reasons for revoking the clearances, which we cannot do under *Brazil. Id.*

Plaintiffs failed to include any argument in their opening brief regarding the Title VII and retaliation claims that did not involve security clearances, and have thus waived any argument that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on these claims. *McKay v. Ingleson,*558 F.3d 888, 891 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009). A bare assertion in a brief with no supporting argument, or an argument made only in passing, is insufficient to avoid waiver. *See Christian Legal Soc. Chapter of the Univ. of Cal. v. Wu,*626 F.3d 483, 488 (9th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.