alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Polly Penhale, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-8030; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#410002003124332c283532012f32276f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="014042407164736c687572416f72672f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 6, 2022, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on February 7, 2022, to:

Permit No. 2022-027

1. Richard Bailey, Deneb US LLC

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-02880 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Micah LAMB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D18-0198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 23, 2018 Rehearing Denied June 25, 2018

Micah Lamb, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for belated appeal is denied. *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(A).

Wetherell, Ray, and Osterhaus, JJ., concur.
#### Ricky Allen BARNETT, Petitioner-Appellant v. Lorie DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee

No. 16-41193

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Filed October 10, 2017

Ricky Allen Barnett, Pro Se

Alex Matthew Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Division, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee

Before DENNIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ricky Allen Barnett, Texas prisoner # 01541732, moves for a certificate of ap-pealability (COA) and leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to reopen the appeal period pursuant to Rule 4(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Rule 4(a)(6) is permissive and compliance with Rule 4(a)(6) does not- require the district court to grant the motion, we review the district court’s denial of the motion for an abuse .of discretion. *See In re Jones,*970 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir. 1992). Barnett did not file his motion to reopen the appeal period within 180 days of the entry of the judgment or within 14 days after he received notice of the judgment and thus did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 4(a)(6)(2). Accordingly, the district court’s denial of the motion was not an abuse of discretion. *Rodriguez v. Johnson,*104 F.3d 694, 696 (5th Cir. 1997).

The motion for a COA. is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. *See Ochoa Canales v. Quarterman,*507 F.3d 884, 888 (5th Cir. 2007); *Dunn v. Cockrell,*302 F.3d 491, 492 (5th Cir. 2002). Even if a COA were required, Barnett has not shown that one should issue. *See Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

He also has not shown that there is a nonfrivolous issue for appeal concerning the denial of his motion to reopen. *See Carson v. Policy,*689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Barnett’s motion for IFP is DENIED. As there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal, the appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R, 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Anthony NEWMAN, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-2955

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00542-CR

Lee ANDERSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015W0196

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appellant’s motion to withdraw 

appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 16, 2015

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Neway MENGISTU, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morton LA KRETZ, an individual; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 12-56860

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 14, 2017 *

Filed February 27, 2017

Neway Mengistu, Pro Se

Lorraine Anderson, Attorney, Law Offices of Lorraine Anderson, Torrance, CA, for Defendants-Appellees

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Neway Mengistu appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his housing discrimination action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Oliva v. Sullivan,*958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992). We vacate and remand.

*571The district court dismissed Mengistu’s action with prejudice for failure to prosecute after Mengistu did not appear on time at a scheduling conference. The district court failed to consider the adequacy of less drastic sanctions, such as dismissal without prejudice. *See id.*(“A district court abuses its discretion if it imposes a sanction of dismissal without first considering the impact of the sanction and the adequacy of less drastic sanctions.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); *see also Ferdik v. Bonzelet,*963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992) (“[Dismissal is a harsh penalty and, therefore, it should only be imposed in extreme circumstances.”). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings.

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court. *See United States v. Elias,*921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”); *Lowry v. Barnhart,*329 F.3d 1019, 1024 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth limited exceptions). Accordingly, Mengis-tu’s request to supplement the appellate record with documents not presented to the district court, filed June 12, 2015, is denied.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                                   Basic Terms

Client: Andrew S. Kennedy, MD             Suite: Office Suites PLUS at Regency
        2500 Regency Pkwy                        Park Attention: Michelle Benson
         Cary, NC 27511                          2500 Regency Parkway
         919.210.1259                            Cary, NC 27511
                                                 919.462.3690
                                                 mpbensonna,officesuiteSolus.com
Billing               Same as above
Address: (if
different)





Term: Start date: 7.12.06                           End Date: 7.31.07

Notice Date:      5.31.07

Office Number:

Window Office /ay Maximum number of
       occupants:



Monthly Fees:
                                                              Services Retainer
                                                              -----------------   -----------------
                                        Initial Programming                       Recurring Monthly
                                         and Installation                               Fees
                                         ----------------

<S>                                          <C>                   <C>              <C>
Package.___________________
      1________Professional office (s)       $425.00               $1,050.00        $1,050.00
             Professional image



Services;___________________=_______
    1____Furniture Package
    1____Telephone Answering Package
    1____Fax/Modem Line
    1    High Speed Internet Access
    8    Hours Meeting Room Use













                                         ----------------     ----------------    ----------------
         Total :                             $425.00               $1,050.00        $1,050.00
                                                                                  ================


Due upon execution of Agreement
         initial Programming and                                                       $425.00
         Installation Services Retainer                                              $1,050.00
         First Month                                                                   $677.40
         Tax                                                                            $24.50
                                                                                        ------
         Total                                                                       $2,176.90

</TABLE>

<PAGE>



     Form 0306                           our people make the difference
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        Pomeroy Computer Resources, Inc.
                 Exhibit 11 - Computation of Earnings Per Share
                 (in  thousands,  except  per  share  amounts)

                                                Quarter Ended
                                                  April 5,
                                              ------------------
                                                 1999     2000
                                              ---------  -------
<S>                                           <C>       <C>
BASIC
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                      11,692   11,883
                                              ==========  =======

Net income                                    $   5,068  $ 6,286
                                              ==========  =======

Net income per common share                   $    0.43  $  0.53
                                              ==========  =======

DILUTED
Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                      11,692   11,883

Dilutive effect of stock options outstanding
during the period                                   166      255

Total common and common equivalent
shares                                           11,858   12,138
                                              ==========  =======

Net income                                    $   5,068  $ 6,286
                                              ==========  =======

Net income per common share                   $    0.43  $  0.52
                                              ==========  =======
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02822]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience 
Integrated Review Group; Clinical Neuroplasticity and 
Neurotransmitters Study Section.
    Date: March 10-11, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Suzan Nadi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5217B, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1259, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0cec1c4c9d3e0c3d3d28ecec9c88ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b252a2f22380b28383965252223652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Small Business: Computational, Modeling and Biodata 
Management.
    Date: March 15, 2022.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marie-Jose Belanger, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm 6188, MSC 7804, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 435-1267, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0c0b020f00090b1c032e0d1d1c4000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccaea9a0ada2aba9bea18cafbfbee2a2a5a4e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-02822 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Edward D. NYE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4061

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 7, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Damian RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-0899

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 3, 2018 Rehearing Denied May 24, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7357** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DEON J. WEBB , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Distr ict of West Virginia , at Wheeling
. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:04

- cr - 00012

- FPS

- JES

- 1; 5:07

- cv - 00027

- FPS

- JES )

Submitted : February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Di smissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Deon J. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Deon J. W ebb seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate o f appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating tha t reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 3 8 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Webb has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabi lity and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 24.2
 
 
 
 STATE OF TEXAS               §
 COUNTY OF DALLAS        §
 
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 Know all men by these presents, that I, TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III, a Director of AMERICA’S CAR-MART INC., a Texas corporation, do constitute and appoint WILLIAM H. HENDERSON and JEFFREY A. WILLIAMS my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for me in any and all capacities, to sign, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for AMERICA’S CAR-MART, INC. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission and National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., together with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and to sign on my behalf and in my stead, in any and all capacities, any amendments to said Annual Report, incorporating such changes as said attorney-in-fact deems appropriate, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
 In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 18th day of June, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Tilman J. Falgout, III
 TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III
 
 
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 Before me this 18th day of June  2010, came TILMAN J. FALGOUT, III, personally known to me, who in my presence did sign and seal the above and foregoing Power of Attorney and acknowledged the same as his true act and deed.
 
 
 /s/ Kiley Young
 NOTARY PUBLIC
WWW.DODSTARBASE.ORG

Point of Contact: Michael O’Toole, Director, Civil-Military Programs (michael.j.otoole.civ@mail.mil)

GENERAL INFORMATION

» Officially authorized as a DoD Civil Military Program by 

Congress in FY93 (10 USC 2193b)

» Hosted by the National Guard, Air Force, Air Force Reserve, 

Army, Navy, and Space Force

» Over 70,000 students participate annually (basic and 

supplemental programs)

» 78 locations including Puerto Rico and Guam

» Indian reservation outreach programs 

» Average cost of approximately $450,000 per program

POPULATION SERVED

» Elementary and middle school students (primarily 5th grade)

» Historically under-represented in STEM careers 

» Inner-city and rural communities

» Racial or ethnic minorities

» Socio-economically disadvantaged

» Under-served and Title 1 schools

EFFICACY

» 26% gain in knowledge (nationwide pre and post-test 

comparison)

» Student attitudes towards STEM subjects and the military 

shift dramatically toward the positive

» Participating teachers gave their highest ratings for students’ 

improved understanding of science, interest in learning about 

science and technology, and increases in student confidence

CURRICULUM FY21

» Science (Science Fundamentals, Characteristic Properties, 

Motion & Force, Science Explorations)

» Technology (Applying Technology)

» Engineering (Engineering Design Process, 3D Computer 

Aided Design)

» Mathematics (Number & Number Relationships, 

Measurement, Geometry, Data Analysis)

» STEM Careers (STEM Careers, Personal Investigations)

MISSION STATEMENT

To expose our nation’s youth to 

the technological environments 

and positive civilian and military 

role models found on Active, 

Guard, and Reserve military 

bases and installations, nurture a 

winning network of collaborators, 

and build mutual loyalty within 

our communities, by providing 

25 hours of exemplary hands-on 

STEM instruction and activities 

that meet or exceed the National 

Standards. 

OUR GOAL

Provide an outstanding, 

unforgettable Science, Technology, 

Engineering, and Mathematics 

(STEM) educational experience for 

students and teachers in a 

hands-on, hi-tech, discovery/

inquiry based environment on a 

military installation.

DoD STARBASE

FY21 FACT SHEET
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 6186]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3569-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]


Mississippi; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of Mississippi (FEMA-3569-EM), dated August 28, 2021, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 14, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, James R. 
Stephenson, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating 
Officer for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Brett H. Howard as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02224 Filed 2-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00199

- CR

Gabriel JIMENEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR0420

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s motion for exten sion of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is

extended to November 2, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE

ALLOWED

.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court