alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Questions for Day of Service Tracking Instrument**

1. Project Name : 2. Project Location :  Street addre ss  C ity, State, Zip  Virtual Opportunity

(participate online from home) 3. Brief Description: 4. How many volunteers are expected to serve: 5. How many national service participants are expected to serv e : 6. How many other attendees are expected : 7. Name (s) of VIP attendees : 8. Names of notable partner(s): 9. When does the opportunity start: [Date and time] 10. When does the opportunity end: [Date and time] 11. Rain date: 12. Is this a one
- tim e event or is it re
- occurring : [yes or no] If re - occurring, how often will it occur: [Weekly, Monthl y, Semi
- annuall y, Annuall y] 13. Lead Organization : [Name, Address, phone, e
- mail, website] 14. If grantee, then which program : [ e.g. ACSN, NCCC, SC - FGs, SC - SCs, SC - RSVP , VI STA] 15. Contact Name, phone and e
- mail : 16. Press contact name, phone, and e
- mail: 17. Populations expected to be served as beneficiaries : [ CNCS populations of interest, e.g. New Americans, Older Americans, Rural Residents, L ow - income Individuals, Veterans , Faith
- based Communities, Communities of Color, Native Americans, People with Disabilities, Veterans, Active Military , Military Families.] 18. Populations expected to be serving as national service participants: [CNCS populations of interest e.g. New Americans, Older Americans, Rural Residents, L ow - income Individuals, Veterans, Faith
- based Communities, Communities of Color, Native Americans, Peop le with Disabilities, Veterans, Active Military , Military

Families.] 19. Populations expected to be serving as volunteers : [ CNCS populations of interest e.g. New Americans, Older Americans, Rural Residents, L ow - income Individuals, Veterans, Faith
- based Communities, Communities of Color, Native Americans, People with Disabilities, Veterans, Active Military , Military Families.] 20. Which of these CNCS strategic focus areas best describes this opportunity : [check all that appl y]  Disaster Services  Economic Opportunity  Education  Environmental Stewardship  Healthy Futures  Veterans and Military Families  Capacity

Building 21. Relevant attachments/links ( such as an event fl ye r, website, press release, photos) : 22. Performance measure s:  Hours of service contributed by community

volunteers who were recruited by CNCS - supported organizations or national service participants  Hours of service contributed by community

volunteers who were managed by CNCS - supported organizations or national service participants
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard A. Ross, as Chief Financial Officer of The FINOVA Group Inc. (the Company) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/     Richard A. Ross                                              
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Richard A. Ross Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
Corry MENCY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-3042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

September 20, 2011

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, Virginia 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor:

On June 20, 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality. This SIP revision amends regulation 9VAC5 Chapter 151 that contains 

the transportation conformity requirements for federal agencies undergoing transportation 

projects in order to incorporate federal revisions to transportation conformity requirements. EPA 

has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing 

it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBRANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CompuPrint, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Dan
Brecher, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Dan Brecher
---------------------------------------
Dan Brecher
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  March 31, 2006
Brian Allen CRAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D17-5060

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 20, 2018

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the revocation of the Appellant's probation and the resulting sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener's error. The trial court orally awarded credit for time served, but the sentencing documents do not reflect that award. The court should correct the written documents to comport with the oral pronouncement. *See**Powell v. State* , 223 So.3d 412, 414 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (affirming the defendant's convictions and sentences, but remanding for the correction of a scrivener's error where the written sentence did not comport with the oral pronouncement of sentence).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of a scrivener's error.

Makar, Winokur, and Winsor, JJ., concur.
p.1 

OAR Box 1394 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

13) ll-B-8 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/3/2008 7:22:10 AM Sheet 13 of 57 
P.2 

A-94-52 

ITS-* 

Docket Ko. 

Category Jl- ffff> 

The following information is located in the confidential files of the 

Director Emission Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, 

North Carolina 27711. This information is confidential pending final 

determination by the Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

7^/'/? >yfi?o^^ ./o ffefeyfcy 'Affhr^^n/his. CWem/fa^fy £/*7/'o*n 

OfyPwsy^Varrf*; Ucf/*'ty on /t«<jusi /£ , //^3 . 

7%/'£ /-"^ 'y'/oo'^i fw^Q/Ss jhfotfr)<*•/•>'on abou-/ -f-frje 

pm/aryi ?;<;•'•/ fa /^"^ ^ ^'^^^l/asS' <WW<?/r>/90y. 7^ v ^»/y^'_^>^/ ^ 

OCT i > 

l/A V., ' 3 

I . 

f
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,194,812              10,242,634
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,194,812              10,242,634
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     554,074                 347,018
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,640,738               9,895,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,194,812              10,242,634
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            1,449,391               1,760,703
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           470,192                 382,717
<COMMISSIONS>                                1,022,449               1,120,320
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                592,391                 792,838
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     592,391                 792,838
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   592,391                 792,838
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.06                   20.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.06                   20.61
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard B. MCNEMAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Marvin PLUMLEY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6547

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: September 8, 2017

Decided: September 25, 2017

Richard B. McNemar, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. Hogan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard B. McNemar seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. *239§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McNemar has not made the requisite showing. *See Davila v. Davis,*— U.S.-, 137 S.Ct. 2058, 2062-63, 198 L.Ed.2d 603 (2017). Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**Exhibit 13**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Commtouch Software Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Gideon Mantel and Ron Ela, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/Gideon Mantel

Gideon Mantel

Chief Executive Officer

June 25, 2007

  | /s/Ron Ela

Ron Ela

Chief Financial Officer

June 25, 2007

 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.45





NEW JOB SUMMARY
FOR
KEVIN CORDELL


		
	DATE:
	December 7, 2018




		
	POSITION:
	Executive Vice President, Chief Global Commercial Officer


    
		
	REPORTING TO:
	Bob Palmisano    




		
	SALARY:
	$515,000 annual salary, less withholdings for Federal, FICA, and State taxes




		
	PAY FREQUENCY: 
	Bi-Weekly




EMPLOYEE
		
	INCENTIVE PLAN:
	You are eligible to participate in the Employee Incentive Plan with a target payout of 70% of your eligible earnings.  The actual payout for this period will be dependent upon business performance as well as your individual performance.




		
	EQUITY:
	Subject to Board of Directors approval and the terms of the Company’s equity      incentive plan, you will be eligible for an equity grant under our long-term incentive grant guidelines.  The target grant for your role is 225% of base salary, but your actual equity grant may be above or below your target depending on, among other factors, final recommendation and approval by the Board and shares available under our equity incentive plan.




RELATIONSHIP TO 
OTHER 
		
	AGREEMENTS:
	Except for the terms of your new position, as described above, this letter agreement does not constitute a contract of employment for a specific term, you remain an employee at will, and this letter agreement does not change or modify any other existing agreements between you and the Company or any subsidiary, which agreements will remain in full force and effect in accordance with their existing terms.




		
	EFFECTIVE DATE:
	January 1, 2019    




Congratulations on your new opportunity as EVP, Chief Global Commercial Officer. I believe this role offers a unique opportunity for you to help us build a successful enterprise with a Team that is committed to our Customers, Employees, and Shareholders. I have no doubt Wright will continue to be a vehicle for growth, excitement, and success and that your contributions will be instrumental in achieving that.























Kindest Regards, 




/s/ Robert J. Palmisano
Robert J. Palmisano
President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Kevin Cordell, accept this offer of employment and agree to the terms and conditions outlined in this letter. 




/s/ Kevin Cordell                                December 7, 2018
Executive Signature                                           Date
Thompson Building Associates - Vital Statistics

Vital Statistics

Business: Insurance Restoration, Remodeling and Property Maintenance

(Commercial and Residential)

Corporation: State of Ohio

Date of Incorporation: 1979 (Founded September, 1978)

Full-Service Licensed Contractor - City of Columbus, License #HIC0514

Federal ID #31-1020606

Primary Service Area - Franklin and Surrounding Counties (out to 70 mile radius for larger losses)

Principals:

James T. Thompson, President

Joni L. Thompson, Executive Vice President

Terry Mosher, VP Operations/Operations Manager

Thompson Building Associates has a field crew of over 30 skilled carpenters, as well as an office support staff of nearly 20 - all dedicated to our

proven system of property damage repair. Since 1978, we have repaired/rebuilt nearly 20,000 Central Ohio properties damaged by everything

from fire and severe storms, to vehicle impacts and explosions!

Professional Affiliations:

Better Business Bureau

National Association of the Remodeling Industry (NARI)

Business Networks (BN10)

Columbus Apartment Association (CAA)

Community Associations Institute (CAI)

Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA)

http://www.thompsonbuilding.com/vitals.htm [2/8/2010 12:17:09 PM]
#### Warren CORUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. L. MENDOZA, Police Officer/Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-2088

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Warren Corum, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Corum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with th.e court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corum v. Mendoza, No. 1:16-cv-00875-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX PARTE David T. HUGHES

1160321 (CR-15-0541)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 2017

Cert. denied.
Sandra BERNAL, Appellant, v. CHRISTIANA TRUST, A DIVISION OF WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, not in its individual capacity but as Trustee of ARLP Trust 3, Luis J. Galarza and Sonia Galarza, Appellees.

No. 4D18-891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[June 13, 2018]

Sandra Bernal, Pembroke Pines, pro se.

No brief filed for appellees.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed* . *See* Fla. R. App. P. 9315(a).

Warner, Forst and Kuntz, JJ., concur.
Craig DONOFF, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. David STEINBERG, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 13, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joel Dallas BONNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6235

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Joel Dallas Bonner, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Eugene Anthony, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Jamie L. Mickelson, Assistant United States Attorney, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joel Dallas Bonner appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Bonner,*No. 3:11-cr-00207-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Kathleen J. RUIZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. Donald E. WILLEY, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-4039

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 15, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
1 The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3958

___________ Ollie M. Hollman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Thomas L. Nellums, Sr., Owner, Tee * and E Trucking/Tee and E Trucking, * [UNPUBLISHED] Inc., * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 28, 2010 Filed: February 2, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Ollie M. Hollman appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment-discrimination su it against her former employer. Having carefully reviewed the record and consid ered Hollman’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. SeeGordon v. Shafer Contracting Co. , 469 F.3d 1191, 1194 (8th Cir.-2- 2006) (de novo standard of review). Acco rdingly, we deny the parties’ pending motions and affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SECTOR POLICIES AND PROGRAMS DIVISION

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

April 18, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting notes for the April 17, 2013 meeting with Stephen Woock of 

Weyerhaeuser

FROM: Kelley Spence (EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG)

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0640

This memorandum summarizes the meeting between Stephen Woock of Weyerhaeuser and the 

EPA on April 17, 2013. This meeting was requested in response to the review of the Kraft Pulp 

Mills New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). 

Meeting Attendees:

John Bradfield, EPA

Kelley Spence, EPA

Nick Swanson, EPA

Stephen Woock, Weyerhaeuser 

Discussion Points:

• NSPS update

o Oxygen correction issues during startup and shutdown for TRS from lime kilns and 

recovery furnaces 

o Scrubber and ESP combinations for pollution control on lime kilns

• Subpart MM update:

o Review of dioxin and acrolein emission estimates in preparation for risk modeling.
EX PARTE Christopher Jarrod LEE

1160213 (2150350)

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 10, 2017

Cert. denied.