7120 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

8See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

9See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

10 Id. 11See Order, 87 FR 935. 

review.8 In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1), Commerce calculated an 

importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping assessment rate for Kaptan 

Demir that is not zero or de minimis, 

and will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce will also instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

1.02 percent to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were produced and/or exported by Icdas 

Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi 

A.S., Kroman Celik Sanayi A.S., Yu ̈ cel 

Boru Ithalat-Ihracat ve Pazarlama A.S ̧., 

and Diler Dis Ticaret A.S. In addition, 

we continue to find that Habas had no 

shipments during the POR. Accordingly, 

consistent with Commerce’s practice, 

we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 

any existing entries of merchandise 

produced by Habas, but exported by 

other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate.9

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice, for entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by Kaptan Demir for which it 

did not know that the merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company(ies) 

involved in the transaction.10

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

under review will be the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the ad valorem rate is 

de minimis, then the cash deposit rate 

will be zero); (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

covered in this review, the cash deposit 

rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company was 

reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most 

recently-completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.90 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the investigation.11 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as final reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under the APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Companies not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

V. Final Determination of no Shipments 

VI. Affiliation and Single Entities 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VIII. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Accept Colakoglu’s Verification Exhibits 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Deny Colakoglu’s Duty Drawback 

Adjustment 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Grant the Turkish Respondents a Full 

Duty Drawback Adjustment 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Contract Date for Kaptan Demir’s 

U.S. Date of Sale 

Comment 5: Whether Section 232 Duties 

Should be Deducted from Export Price 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Reclassify Kaptan Demir’s Claimed 

Levels of Trade 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Value of Kaptan Demir’s 

Scrap and Defective Merchandise 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Kaptan Demir’s TOTCOM for Idle 

Asset Expenses 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Treat INTNFR2U as a Movement 

Expense or Commission Expense 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Permit an Offset for Kaptan Demir’s 

Short Term Deposit Income 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02638 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–484–803] 

Large Diameter Welded Pipe From 

Greece: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that the 

producer/exporter subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

April 19, 2019, through April 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Litwin, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 7121 

1See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Greece: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 43172 

(August 6, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 

2The petitioners are American Cast Iron Pipe 

Company, Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Berg Spiral Pipe 

Corp., Dura-Bond Industries, JS W Steel (USA) Inc., 

Stupp Corporation, Welspun Global Trade LLC, 

individually and as members of the American Line 

Pipe Producers Association; Greens Bayou Pipe 

Mill, LP; Skyline Steel; and Trinity Products LLC 

(collectively, the petitioners). 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated 

September 14, 2021; see also Corinth’s Letter, ‘‘Case 

Brief on behalf of Corinth Pipeworks and Corinth 

America,’’ dated September 14, 2021; Petitioners’ 

Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated September 28, 2021; 

and Corinth’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief on Behalf of 

Corinth Pipeworks and Corinth America,’’ dated 

September 28, 2021. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of Large Diameter Welded Pipe from 

Greece: Scheduling of Public Hearing,’’ dated 

October 26, 2021. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large 

Diameter Welded Carbon and Alloy Steel Line Pipe 

from Greece,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of 2019–2020 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated November 19, 2021. 

7On June 22, 2020, Commerce published a notice 

in the Federal Register revoking the order, in part, 

with respect to certain welded pipe products with 

specific combinations of grades, diameters, and 

wall thicknesses in response to a changed 

circumstances review request. This change in the 

scope was effective as of June 22, 2020, and, thus, 

not applicable to this review. See Large Diameter 

Welded Pipe from Greece: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 

Reviews, 85 FR 37424 (June 22, 2020). For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

9 Id. 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6002. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers one producer and 

exporter of the subject merchandise, 

Corinth Pipeworks Pipe Industry S.A. 

(Corinth). On August 6, 2021, 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results.1 In September 2021, we 

received case and rebuttal briefs from 

the petitioners 2 and Corinth.3 On 

October 26, 2021, we held a public 

hearing to discuss interested parties’ 

comments.4 For a description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.5 On November 

19, 2021, Commerce extended the final 

results of this review by 60 days, until 

February 2, 2022.6

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is welded carbon and alloy steel 

line pipe (other than stainless steel 

pipe), more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) 

in nominal outside diameter (large 

diameter welded line pipe), regardless 

of wall thickness, length, surface finish, 

grade, end finish, or stenciling. Large 

diameter welded pipe may be used to 

transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other 

fluids, liquids, or gases. 

The large diameter welded line pipe 

that is subject to this order is currently 

classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

under subheadings 7305.11.1030, 

7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 

7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 

7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 

7305.19.1060, and 7305.19.5000. 

Merchandise currently classifiable 

under subheadings 7305.31.4000, 

7305.31.6090, 7305.39.1000 and 

7305.39.5000 and that otherwise meets 

the above scope language is also 

covered. While the HTSUS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this order is 

dispositive.7

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the appendix 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.8

Interested parties can find a complete 

discussion of these issues and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we find it appropriate to apply 

a dumping margin based on total 

adverse facts available (AFA) to Corinth, 

in accordance with sections 776(a) and 

(b) of the Act.9 For further discussion, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margin to 

the firm listed below for the period 

April 19, 2019, through April 30, 2020: 

Producers/exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Corinth Pipeworks Pipe Industry 

S.A .......................................... 41.04 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with a final 

determination within five days of any 

public announcement or, if there is no 

public announcement, within five days 

of the date of publication of the notice 

of final determination in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). However, because 

Commerce applied total AFA to the sole 

mandatory respondent in this review in 

accordance with section 776 of the Act, 

and the AFA dumping margin is based 

solely on the petition, there are no 

calculations to disclose. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Because we are applying total AFA as 

to Corinth’s entries for this POR, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an assessment rate 

to all entries Corinth produced and/or 

exported equal to the dumping margin 

indicated above. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7122 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

10See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from Greece: 

Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determination and Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 

18769 (May 2, 2019). 

1See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Sodium Nitrite from 

India and Russia: Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Petitions,’’ dated January 13, 2022 (the 

Petitions). 2 Id. 

3See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petitions for the 

Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties on Imports of Sodium Nitrite from India and 

the Russian Federation: Supplemental Questions,’’ 

dated January 19, 2022; ‘‘Petition for the Imposition 

of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Sodium 

Nitrite from India: Supplemental Questions,’’ dated 

January 19, 2022; and ‘‘Petition for the Imposition 

of Antidumping Duties on Imports of Sodium 

Nitrite from the Russian Federation: AD 

Questions,’’ dated January 20, 2022; see also 

Memoranda, ‘‘Phone Call with Counsel to the 

Petitioner,’’ dated January 27, 2022. 

4See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Petition for the 

Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties on Imports of Sodium Nitrite from India and 

Russia: Supplemental Questionnaire Responses to 

Petition General Issues,’’ dated January 21, 2022 

(General Issues Supplement); ‘‘Sodium Nitrite from 

India and Russia: Errata to Supplemental 

Questionnaire Responses to Petition General 

Issues,’’ dated January 24, 2022 (General Issues 

Errata); ‘‘Sodium Nitrite from India: Responses to 

Supplemental Questions Regarding the 

Antidumping Duty Petition,’’ dated January 24, 

2022; ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of Antidumping 

Duties on Imports of Sodium Nitrite from Russia: 

Responses to Supplemental Questions Regarding 

the Antidumping Duty Petition,’’ dated January 24, 

2022; ‘‘Sodium Nitrite from India and Russia: 

Second Supplemental Questionnaire Response to 

Petition General Issues,’’ dated January 27, 2022 

(Second General Issues Supplement); ‘‘Sodium 

Nitrite from India: Responses to Second 

Supplemental Questions Regarding the 

Antidumping Duty Petition,’’ dated January 27, 

2022; and ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of 

Antidumping Duties on Imports of Sodium Nitrite 

from Russia: Responses to Second Supplemental 

Questions Regarding the Antidumping Duty 

Petition,’’ dated January 27, 2022. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Corinth will be 

the rate shown above; (2) for previously 

investigated companies not 

participating in this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent segment 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 10.26 

percent, the all-others rate made 

effective by the LTFV investigation.10

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is being issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Application of Facts Available and Use of 

Adverse Inferences 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse 

Facts Available (AFA) for Corinth’s 

Failure to Provide an Adequate Cost 

Reconciliation 

Comment 2: Application of Total AFA for 

Corinth’s Failure to Provide Adequate 

Cost Buildups 

Comment 3: Application of Partial AFA to 

Corinth’s Unreconciled Costs 

Comment 4: Adjustment of Corinth’s 

Reported Interest Expense Ratio to 

Account for Certain Excluded Expenses 

Comment 5: Inclusion of ‘‘Idle’’ Costs in 

Corinth’s General and Administrative 

(G&A) Expenses 

Comment 6: Application of Partial AFA to 

Services Provided by Dia.Vi.Pe.Thi.V 

S.A 

Comment 7: Double Counting of Foreign 

Port Charges on U.S. Sales 

Comment 8: Section 232 Duty Deduction 

from Corinth’s Constructed Export Price 

(CEP) 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02637 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–906, A–821–836] 

Sodium Nitrite From India and the 

Russian Federation: Initiation of LessThan-Fair-Value Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable February 2, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy 

Zhang (India) or Paola Aleman Ordaz 

(the Russian Federation (Russia)); AD/ 

CVD Operations, Offices III and IV, 

respectively, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1168 and (202) 482–4031, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petitions 

On January 13, 2022, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) received 

antidumping duty (AD) petitions 

concerning imports of sodium nitrite 

from India and Russia filed in proper 

form on behalf of Chemtrade Chemicals 

US, LLC (the petitioner), a domestic 

producer of sodium nitrite.1 The 

Petitions were accompanied by 

countervailing duty (CVD) petitions 

concerning imports of sodium nitrite 

from India and Russia.2

Between January 19 and 27, 2022, 

Commerce requested supplemental 

information pertaining to certain aspects 

of the Petitions in separate 

supplemental questionnaires and 

telephone calls.3 The petitioner filed 

responses to the supplemental 

questionnaires on January 21, 24, and 

27, 2022.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES