alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          38,695
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     13,480,961
<ALLOWANCE>                                    269,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,386,653
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            880,098
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,742,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          111,550
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           648
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,651,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              14,386,653
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                366,525
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               189,082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          161,567
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   98,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 79,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,128
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.2
<LOANS-NON>                                    318,016
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               264,983
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   94,583
<RECOVERIES>                                       713
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              269,339
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Donna WIEGAND, Appellant, v. Kenneth HADLEY, individually, and/or estate of Kenneth Hadley, deceased, Olive Hadley, individually, and Florida Farm Bureau General Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 1D17-2417

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 29, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
#### Raymond J. KEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Honorable Judge Leslie L. LILLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-1863

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: November 21, 2016

Raymond J. Key, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond J. Key, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Key v. Lilley, No. 2:16-cv-00130-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. June 30,2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD.

2016 STOCK PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Nabors Industries Ltd. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the Nabors Industries Ltd. 2016 Stock Plan (the “Plan”), as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of February 22, 2019:

 

1.             Section 4(c) shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:

 

“(c) The aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Awards under this Plan (including Awards payable in cash but denominated in Shares, i.e., cash-settled Restricted Stock Units or SARs) may be granted to any individual Participant during any calendar year shall not exceed 3,000,000; provided, however, that the foregoing limitation shall not apply to Awards granted on or after January 1, 2019. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the maximum amount of compensation that may be awarded to any single Director in any calendar year (including Awards under the Plan, determined based on the Fair Market Value of such Award(s) as of the grant date, as well as any cash fees) shall be $550,000 and (ii) in no event shall any individual Award (other than Awards that may by their terms be paid or settled solely in cash) be granted under this Plan with respect to a number of Shares that exceeds one percent of the Company’s total issued and outstanding Shares as of the date of grant.”

 

2.             As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank;

Signature Page Follows]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed this 22nd day of February, 2019, effective for all purposes as provided above.

 

	
 
    	
NABORS INDUSTRIES   LTD.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/Mark   D. Andrews 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Mark D.   Andrews
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Corporate   Secretary
    


 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO

AMENDMENT NO.2 TO 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. 2016 STOCK PLAN
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          87,636
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              35
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    534,550
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,184
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,495
<LOANS>                                      2,034,856
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,873,767
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,941,996
<SHORT-TERM>                                   435,358
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             33,689
<LONG-TERM>                                    217,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,078
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,639
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,873,767
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                155,480
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               41,778
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,281
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               199,539
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              71,009
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             101,252
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           98,287
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,548
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,547
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 92,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,731
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,934
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.99
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,987
<LOANS-PAST>                                    39,632
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                20,332
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,358
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,376
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,898
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            21,898
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,242


</TABLE>
Vinodh RAGHUBIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-3367

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed December 26, 2017 Rehearing Denied January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7327

STEPHEN A. SHARP,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-97-1170-AM)

Submitted: March 16, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen A. Sharp, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Sharp v. Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA97-1170-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1493 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 

provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2021 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to modify a provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sand Acquisition, 

5 Nourishment, and Development Act’’ or the ‘‘SAND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL. 

7 Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ‘‘if such 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1493 IH

1 materials are not available from domestic sources for envi2 ronmental or economic reasons’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Christopher BARTSCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-3396

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 31, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Yak Communications Inc. (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Margaret Noble, principal financial officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                            
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Margaret Noble         
|                   |  |     |  | Margaret Noble             
|                   |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer
# ,*tatz of NPfu Arxzq DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION JON S. CORZINE Governor DivisionofAir Quality Air Quality Permitting Element Bureau ofTechnical Services 401 E. State Street P.O . Box 027 Trenton, NJ 08625-027 Phone: (609) 292-9258 

### June 23, 2009 Ronald J. Borsellino, Acting Director Division ofEnvironmental Planning and Protection United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 

### 290Broadway New York, New

York 10007-1866 Dear Acting Director Borsellino: MARK N . MAURIELLO Commissioner

OnApril 21, 2009 the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (Department) sent Acting Regional Administrator Pavlou a revision to the New Jersey State Implementation Plan (SIP) incorporating rule changes updating the Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for fourteen (14) source categories. On June 4, 2009 you sent a letter to Department Commissioner Mark Mauriello requesting Department staff to forward copies of the codified versions of eachamended rule as soon as they become available. The codified versions ofeach amended rule are attached herein. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitateto contact me at (609) 633-1120 . Sincerely yours, 

# 0-~. 7L G,~w Allan H . Willinger, Co-Rule Manager Enclosures: The following subchapters of Chapter 27 "Air PollutionControl" : Subchapter 4 "Control and Prohibition of Particles fromCombustion of Fuel" Subchapter 8 "Permits and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and Major Facilities Without an Operating Permit)" Subchapter 10"Sulfur in Solid Fuels"

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer . Printed on Recycled Paper and RecyclableSubchapter 16 "Control and Prohibition ofAir Pollution by Volatile Organic Compounds"

Subchapter 19 "Control and Prohibition ofAir Pollution from Oxides ofNitrogen" Subchapter 21 "Emission Statements" The following subchapter of Chapter 27A "AirAdministrative Procedures and Penalties" : Subchapter 3 "Civil Administrative Penalties and Requests for Adjudicatory Hearings"

c: Raymond W

. Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch, USEPA Region 11 Nancy Wittenberg, Assistant Commissioner, w/o enclosures WilliamO'Sullivan, Director, w/o enclosuresbc: Chris Salmi, Assistant Director, AQM, w/o enclosures Danny Wong, Acting Bureau Chief, AQM, w/o enclosures John Gorgol, Supervisor, AQM, w/o enclosures John Preczewski, Assistant Director, AQP, w/o enclosures Frank Steitz, Acting Bureau Chief, AQP, w/o enclosures John Jenks, Chief, AQP, w/o enclosures Joel Leon, Section Chief, AQP, w/o enclosures Kevin Greener, Co-Rule Manager, AQP, w/o enclosures DAGEileen Kelly, w/o enclosures SIPfile, with enclosures (Willa Williams) Rule file, SIP correspondence (currentlyAllan Willinger), with enclosures
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Landon Newton <bnaerialinnovations@gmail.com>

Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 4:03 PM

To: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption: B & N Aerial Innovations FAA-2015-0097

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Completed

Hi Dan,

The aircraft is a DJI Phantom 2 Vision +

It is a Quad Rotor Aircraft. 

MAXIMUM WEIGHT: 1242g

-Michael Brewer

Aerial Innovations

From: <Dan.Ngo@faa.gov> 

Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:11 PM 

Subject: Petition for Exemption: B & N Aerial Innovations FAA-2015-0097 

To: mbrewer@kw.com

Cc: 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov

April 29, 2015 

 

Dear Mr. Brewer: 

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015- 0097). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition.
2

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for 

the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Any 

additional confidential/proprietary materials can be e-mailed separately to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you do 

send in supplemental documents separately, please add a comment on the docket, indicating that you submitted 

supplemental information separately. 

 

If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by May 13, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

 

Regards, 

Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Federal Aviation Administration

202.267.4264

 

 

 

 

Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Federal Aviation Administration

202.267.4264
3
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Norman
Blashka, certify that:





1.
            I
      have reviewed this Form 10-K of Salon Media Group,
  Inc.:





2.
            Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;





3.
            Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;





4.
            The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
            The
      registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







/s/ Norman
      BlashkaJune
      27, 2008
            Norman
      BlashkaChief
      Financial Officer