alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,150-02

EX PARTE JEFFREY MCDONALD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 963695-A IN THE 182 DISTRICT COURT ND

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). This Court remanded the writ application for

a live hearing. Ex parte McDonald, No. WR-81,150-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 4, 2015) (not

designated for publication). The District Clerk forwarded a supplemental record to this Court

containing, among other things, findings of fact and conclusions of law in which the habeas court

recommends that relief be denied. The findings and conclusions refer to an evidentiary hearing

conducted on August 18, 2015. However, this Court has no transcription or other record of the
2

evidentiary hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07 § 3(d). 

The judge of the 182 District Court of Harris County shall file a response with this Court nd

by having the District Clerk submit the transcript from the evidentiary hearing pertaining to this

habeas corpus application, along with any other parts of the record that have not been forwarded. 

If the court did not hold a live hearing, the court shall certify that there was no hearing and enter

supplemental findings of fact explaining why none was held. The answer shall be submitted within

45 days of the date of this order. No extensions of time will be entertained. 

Filed: June 29, 2016

Do not publish
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                              THE FINOVA GROUP INC.
            Computation of Ratio of Income to Combined Fixed Charges
                          and Preferred Stock Dividends
                             (Dollars in Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Nine Months Ended                    Year Ended
                                     September 30,                    December 31,
                                 ---------------------     ----------------------------------
                                   1996         1995         1995         1994         1993
                                 --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>     
Income before income
 taxes                           $136,615     $115,310     $157,240     $123,771     $ 66,422
Add fixed charges:
 Interest expense                 298,158      267,857      366,822      222,200      123,853
 One-third rentals                  1,863        1,844        2,478        2,041        1,387
                                 --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
   Total fixed charges            300,021      269,701      369,300      224,241      125,240
                                 --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Income as adjusted               $436,636     $385,011     $526,540     $348,012     $191,662
                                 --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Ratio of income to fixed
 charges                             1.46         1.43         1.43         1.55         1.53
                                 ========     ========     ========     ========     ========
Preferred stock dividends
 on a pre-tax basis              $      0     $      0     $      0     $      0     $  2,139
   Total combined fixed
    charges and preferred
    stock dividends              $300,021     $269,701     $369,300     $224,241     $127,379
                                 --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
Ratio of income to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 stock dividends                     1.46         1.43         1,43         1.55         1.50
                                 ========     ========     ========     ========     ========
</TABLE>

                                       12
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Salon Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Norman Blashka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Norman
Blashka


June
      26, 2009
            Norman
      Blashka


Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-58296) and related prospectuses of
Insight Communications Company, Inc. for the registration of 5,000,000 shares of
its Class A Common Stock and certain other securities and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-57808) pertaining to the Insight Communications
Company, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 12, 2001, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Insight Communications
Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000, as amended, included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K/A-2).


                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
May 25, 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
MASSBANK Corp.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-11949 and No. 33-82110) on Form S-8 of MASSBANK Corp. of our report dated
January 17, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MASSBANK Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears
in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of MASSBANK Corp.



                                                        /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1997
From: Ungvarsky, John

To: Ungvarsky, John

Subject: Ferreria email re requests for ARB to flag data in AQS for 2013 and 2014

Date: Monday, May 16, 2016 7:15:17 PM

Attachments: image001.png

From: Shawn Ferreria [mailto:Shawn.Ferreria@valleyair.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 1:21 PM

To: Najita, Theresa@ARB

Cc: Jon Klassen

Subject: RE: District requests ARB to flag data in AQS for 2013 and 2014

The valley experienced the strongest recorded atmospheric stability over the past 15 years during the fall 2013 and winter 2014. This

 stable pattern effectively trapped pollutants and caused elevated particulate concentrations. Climate conditions caused by this type of

 weather pattern resulted in historically dry and poor air quality conditions in the San Joaquin Valley and other parts of California.

From: Shawn Ferreria 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 1:18 PM

To: tnajita@arb.ca.gov

Cc: Jon Klassen; 'webster.tasat@arb.ca.gov'

Subject: District requests ARB to flag data in AQS for 2013 and 2014

Importance: High

Good Afternoon Theresa,

As referenced in the attached June 5, 2015 letter, the District intended to pursue the following data points as potential exceptional event

days.    The San Joaquin Valley APCD is requesting ARB to flag the following in AQS as RL-other.

Event Description: 

The valley experienced the strongest recorded atmospheric stability over the past 15 years during the fall 2013 and winter 2014. This

 stable pattern effectively trapped pollutants and caused elevated particulate concentrations. Climate conditions caused by this type of

 weather pattern resulted in historically dry and poor air quality conditions in the San Joaquin Valley and other parts of California. The

 historic strength and longevity of this high pressure system resulted in a lack of rainfall especially in central and southern California,

 leading to a third consecutive year of below average rainfall totals during the 2013 calendar year.

Date Site Name AQS ID Parameter

Code POC Concentration

(μg/m3) Flag Requested

18-Dec-13

Hanford 06-031-1004 81102 1 177 RL - Other (Drought)

Visalia-Church Street 06-107-2002 81102 2 155 RL - Other (Drought)

21-Jan-14 Bakersfield-California Avenue 06-029-0014 81102 7 158.5 RL - Other (Drought)

Date Site Name AQS ID Parameter

Code POC Concentration

(μg/m3) Flag Requested

17-Dec-13 Bakersfield-California Avenue* 06-029-0014 81102 7 237 RL - Other (Drought)

18-Dec-13 Bakersfield-California Avenue* 06-029-0014 81102 7 184 RL - Other (Drought)

*-ARB is currently investigating if the Bakersfield-California Avenue December 17 and 18, 2013 PM10 data is going to be uploaded into AQS.  If

so, ARB would also need to flag these data points. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shawn Ferreria

Senior Air Quality Specialist

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

1990 East Gettysburg Avenue

Fresno, CA 93726

Office: (559) 230-5823, Forecaster Desk: (559) 230-5826, Fax: (559) 230-6064
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2
        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Jane Morlok, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
        Officer of Breda Telephone Corp., certify that to my knowledge (i) Breda Telephone Corp.s Annual
        Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of Breda Telephone Corp.

|                      |                        
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|Date:  March 28, 2007 |                        
|                      | /s/ Jane Morlok        
|                      |                        
|                      | Jane Morlok            
|                      | Chief Financial Officer

|E-4
|---
John M. KILGORE, Appellant, v. Denise A. DOUGLAS, as personal representative of the Estate of Dreka Andrews; Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a Bank of New York, as trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2006-18; and Rexanne Smith a/k/a Rexanne Smith Williams, Appellees.

Case No. 2D17-2164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 20, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Darlene MITCHEM, owner of All My Children Day Care Center, All My Children Day Care Center 2, and All My Children Learning Center, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.

No. 1D17-4633

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40138

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUGENIO MONTOYA-CARILLO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:18-CR-775-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eugenio MontoyaCarillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montoya-Carillo has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 12, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40138 Document: 00515072351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/12/2019
No. 19-40138

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-40138 Document: 00515072351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/12/2019
Robert John MCGINNESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-2911

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 2, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Victor RODRIGUEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1045

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 11, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

SECTOR POLICIES AND PROGRAMS DIVISION

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS

O FFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

April 18 , 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting notes for the April 17, 2013 meeting with Stephen Woock of

Weyerhaeuser

FROM: Kelley Spence (EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG)

TO: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0640

This memorandum summarizes the meeting between Stephen Woock of Weyerhaeuser and the

EPA on April 17, 2013

. This meeting was requested in response to the review of the Kraft Pulp

Mills New Source Performance Standards (NSPS).

Meeting Attendees:

John Bradfield , EPA

Kelley Spence, EPA

Nick Swanson, EPA

Stephen Woock, Weyerhaeuser

D iscussion Points :

• NSPS update

o Oxygen correction issues during startup and shutdown for TRS from lime kilns and

recovery furnaces

o Scrubber and ESP combinations for pollution control on lime kilns

• Subpart MM update:

o Review of dioxin and acrolein emission estimates in preparation for risk modeling.
To: File 

From: Michael Jensen, DOE GC-71 

Date: July 27, 2010 

Re: Ex parte discussion with California Department of Housing and Community 

Development 

On July 27, 2010, Michael Jensen (GC-71), Kate Gehringer (GC-52), Harry Indig (EE2J), Bob Lucas (PNL), and Dave Conover (PNL) spoke with Kevin Cimini, Richard 

Weinert, and Bradley Harward, all of the California Department of Housing and 

Community Development, on their office’s role as a State Administrative Agency (SAA) 

under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) manufactured 

housing program. 

First, Mr. Cimini explained that California’s role as an SAA is to monitor defects in 

construction of manufactured homes as specified in 24 C.F.R. 3282, Subpart I, and 

indicated that California no longer serves either as a design approval primary inspection 

agency or a production inspection primary inspection agency under the HUD program. 

Mr. Cimini noted that California relies on consumer complaints, manufacturer reporting, 

installer reporting, and SAA record audits and investigations to monitor the manufactured 

housing industry within the state. Mr. Cimini approximated that California receives 

thirty to fifty consumer complaints each year and that energy-related complaints are 

extremely rare. Mr. Cimini stated that California initiates approximately thirty to forty 

enforcement actions each year, almost all of which settle soon after initiation. Mr. 

Cimini mentioned that the last case that did not settle soon after enforcement proceedings 

were initiated occurred five years ago; however, this case eventually settled without the 

need for an informal or formal presentation of views. 

Mr. Cimini stated that California inspects new home installations in mobile home parks 

under HCD jurisdiction and that building code officials inspect all other new 

manufactured home installations. Mr. Cimini mentioned that local building officials 

performing installation inspections are not as familiar with the federal regulations and 

may not be as thorough as they could be. California issues permits and inspects all 

manufactured home alteration projects regardless of location. Mr. Cimini estimated that 

sixty percent of manufactured homes within California are located on private property 

while an estimated forty percent are located in manufactured home parks. Mr. Cimini 

also noted that California has approximately fifty staff members that conduct inspections 

and audits of manufactured homes. 

Mr. Cimini noted that not many manufactured homes are using renewable resources as 

energy resources, including photovoltaic and geothermal systems. Finally, Mr. Cimini 

recommended Oregon and Nebraska state agencies as other points of contacts. 

End of conversation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamel Heggs, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 637]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 16, 2002 *(People v Heggs,*300 AD2d 507 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 23, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Smith and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
# U.S. Navy Aircraft Transits the Taiwan Strait

## From Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs 

The aircraft's transit of the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the United States' commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. The United States military flies, sails and operates anywhere international law allows.
Exhibit 10.10

 

Letter of Spouse Consent

 

I,                   (ID No.:                                 ), is the legal spouse of                   (ID No.:                                     ). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree that                   enters into the following documents (“Transaction Documents”) on October 30, 2018, and that the equity held by and registered under the name of                      in Beijing Xiangshang Yiyi Technology Co., Ltd. (“Domestic Company”) will be disposed of according to the following documents:

 

(1)                                 The Equity Pledge Contract entered into by                     , Beijing Xiangshang Yixin Technology Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”), the Domestic Company and other parties;

 

(2)                                 The Exclusive Option Contract entered into by                   , the WFOE, the Domestic Company and other parties; and

 

(3)                                 The Power of Attorney entered into by                   , the WFOE, and other parties.

 

I hereby acknowledge that I have no interest in the equity of the Domestic Company and undertake not to make any claim over the equity, operation and management of the Domestic Company. I further acknowledge that it will not require my authorization or consent for                        to perform the Transaction Documents and to amend or terminate the Transaction Documents.

 

I undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) are properly performed.

 

I agree and undertake that if I acquire any equity in the Domestic Company for any reason, I will be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations of a shareholder of the Domestic Company under the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time). For that purpose, upon the request of the WFOE, I will execute a series of written documents substantially in the form and content of the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).

 

	
 
    	
Spouse: 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date:
Joshua Raheem LONG v. STATE

CR-15-0963

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN WASH

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 612

ROBERT L. FERDINAND, JR., SAMUEL

HINES, LOOKING GOOD MANAGEMENT,

INC. AND CRYSTAL SHARON

,

Appellee s

.

__ ________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Seminole County

, Melanie Chase , Judge.

Jennifer R. Dixon, Terry C. Young, and

James S. Toscano, of Lowndes, Drosdick,

Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for

Appellant.

Scott D. Clark, Mitchell E. Albaugh, and

Christopher M. Hamilton, of Clark &

Albaugh, LLP, Winter Park, for Appellee

Robert L. Ferdinand, Jr.

No appearance for other Appellees.

EDWARDS , J.

After careful consideration, we affirm the trial court’s rulings on all but one issue

raised on appeal. Because the trial court erred by failing to apportion the award of2

attorney's f ees between John Wash ( “ Appellant ” ) and his counsel, w e remand the case

to the trial court for entry of an amended order apportioning the fees between Appellant

and his counsel as required by s ection 57.105, Florida Statutes (201 4 )

.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA and BERGER , JJ., concur.