alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,032
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             899
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,530
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                98,827
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      2,832
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,832
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,832
<LOANS>                                         37,438
<ALLOWANCE>                                        587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,037
<DEPOSITS>                                      79,035
<SHORT-TERM>                                    36,785
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                     31,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           863
<OTHER-SE>                                     (33,401)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 159,037
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,042
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   79
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,852
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,505
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,347
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       73
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,136,940
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,136,940
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,234,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.89
<LOANS-NON>                                         86
<LOANS-PAST>                                       233
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    585
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   515
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  587
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               515
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             72
        

</TABLE>
Davarius Antawn DURHAM, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0769

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 28, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

 

RAE Systems Inc., a California corporation 

 

RAE Systems (Asia) Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong 

 

RAE Systems Hong Kong Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong 

 

RAE Systems Europe ApS, incorporated in Denmark 

 

RAE United Kingdom Limited, incorporated in the United Kingdom 

 

RAE France, incorporated in France 

 

REnex Technology Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong 

 

RAE Systems Shanghai Incorporated, incorporated in the Jiading District of Shanghai 

 

Nettaxi Online Communities, a Delaware corporation 

 

RAE KLH (Beijing) Co. Ltd., incorporated in Beijing
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2002, included
in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of Apple Hospitality Two, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Apple Hospitality
Two, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 2002
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1498 

To require that local educational agencies disclose negotiations with teacher 

unions as a condition for eligibility to receive funds under the Elementary 

and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund of the Education Stabilization Fund of the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2021 

Mr. GOOD of Virginia (for himself, Ms. FOXX, Mr. BUDD, Mr. CAWTHORN, 

Mr. GOHMERT, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Ms. HERRELL, and Mr. NORMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To require that local educational agencies disclose negotiations with teacher unions as a condition for eligibility 

to receive funds under the Elementary and Secondary 

School Emergency Relief Fund of the Education Stabilization Fund of the Coronavirus Response and Relief 

Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Students Before 

5 Unions Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1498 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR RECEIPT OF FUNDS. 

2 Section 313(c) of division M of the Coronavirus Re3 sponse and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 

4 (Public Law 116–260) is amended by inserting before the 

5 period the following: ‘‘, except that a local educational 

6 agency may not receive a subgrant under this subsection 

7 unless any negotiations between the local educational 

8 agency and a labor organization with respect to the condi9 tions for the provision of in-person instruction are docu10 mented in writing and made public’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6809

KENT BELL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. J. MESSINA, (Woman) Staff MCTC; STACEY HOFFMAN, (Staff) MCTC; JASON GANOE, (Staff) MCTC; RICHARD DOVEY, (Warden) MCTC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 01354

- GLR )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 4, 2018

Before DUNCAN and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kent Bell , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kent Bell appeals the dis trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bell ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the distri ct court’s disposition, Bell has forfeited appellate review
of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserv ed in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we deny Bell’s motion for appointment
of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
STATE of Louisiana v. Kelly B. COCKERHAM

No. 2017-KO-1802

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 15, 2018

**ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, PARISH OF WEST BATON ROUGE**

Writ denied.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons.

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons:

*1036As Judge Holdridge notes in his dissent below, without an amendment to the habitual offender bill of information by the district attorney, the district court was limited to sentencing the defendant as a third-felony offender. I agree and would therefore reverse the fourth-felony adjudication and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
Ron GOLDMAN and Joel Goldman, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SPACE COAST CREDIT UNION, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2096

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement No. 333-47362 on Form S-8, No. 333-41726 on Form S-3/A,
No. 333-64798 on Form S-3/A, No. 333-68084 on Form S-8, No. 333-69418 on Form
S-3 and No. 333-69408 on Form S-3.

                                              /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                              -----------------------
                                              Arthur Andersen LLP
San Jose, California
September 28, 2001
Exhibit 32.1


                                  Certification
                       pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             -------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of Immtech International, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T.
Stephen Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                       /s/ T. Stephen Thompson
                       ----------------------------------------
                       T. Stephen Thompson
                       President & Chief Executive Officer
                       August 5, 2005
STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph McKinley GUILLORY aka Joseph Guillory

NO. 2017-KO-1964

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 1, 2018

Denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Yak Communications (USA), Inc. (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
Zwebner, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

       (1).       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

       (2).       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date:  September 25, 2002                       By:  /s/ Charles Zwebner
                                                     Charles Zwebner
                                                     Chief Executive Officer &
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.02**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Michael H. Carrel, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ZambaCorporation;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I, are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | May 14,  2004                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Michael H. Carrel                                 |   |
|   | Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: January 28, 2010
    /s/ Randall GausmanRandall GausmanVice President and Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4644

_____________________________
K

ARLOS F RANCIS S MITH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

. October 14, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tall ahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Henry C. Duques, the Chief Executive Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Henry C. Duques    
|                     |  |  |  | Henry C. Duques        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### Juan Antonio CONTRERAS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-7500

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 31, 2017

Decided: September 13, 2017

*199Juan Antonio Contreras, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior- Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Juan Antonio Contreras, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Contreras v. Ratledge,*No. 5:14-hc-02014-D, 2016 WL 9077876 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00807-CV

IN RE Jacklyn DAVIDSON

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 9, 2022, relator filed a second first amended petition for writ of mandamus.2

Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief. After considering the petition and this record, this 

court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion for temporary relief is denied 

as moot. 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022-PA-01621, styled In the Interest of E.D., et al, Children, pending in 

the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez presiding. 2 Relator’s first filed first amended petition for writ of mandamus was stricken for violating Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.9.
EXHIBIT 21

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

(as of December 31, 2006)

 

Subsidiary of Terra Energy & Resource Technologies, Inc.

 

1. Terra Insight Corporation, a Delaware corporation, 100% owned

2. Terra Insight Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 100% owned

 

Subsidiary of Terra Insight Corporation

 

1. Terra Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 100% owned

 

Subsidiaries of Terra Resources, Inc.

 

1. Terra Resources Operations Co., Inc., a Texas corporation, 100% owned

2.  Namterra Mineral Resources Proprietary Limited, 95% owned

 

Equity Interests of Terra Resources, Inc.

 

1. Tierra Nevada Exploration Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership

2. New Found Oil Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership

3. TexTerra Exploration Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership