alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                       REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this
"Amendment") is entered into as of the Effective Date of August, 1996, between
EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN, INC., a Washington corporation ("Buyer") and TERRACE
POINT PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado general partnership ("Seller").

Buyer and Seller agree and hereby amend the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
July 2, 1996 as follows:

SECTION 6.  TITLE INSURANCE.

1.  DELIVERY OF TITLE COMMITMENT - Within thirty (30) days after the Effective
    Date, Seller shall provide Buyer with a preliminary commitment for owner's 
    title insurance with extended coverage issued by Chicago Title Insurance 
    Company, with copies of all exceptions set forth therein.

2.  DELIVERY OF ALTA SURVEY - Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date,
    Buyer shall cause an ALTA survey of the Property to be completed.  In the 
    event of closing, Seller shall credit Buyer in the amount of $3,000.00.

SECTION 3.  CONTINGENCIES.

1.  FEASIBILITY PERIOD - Buyer shall have ninety (90) days from the Effective
    Date ("the Feasibility Period") to satisfy or waive the contingencies set 
    forth in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

2.  CONTINGENCY PERIOD - Buyer shall have two hundred ten days ("the
    Contingency Period") from the end of the Feasibility Period to satisfy or 
    waive the contingencies set forth in Section 3.3 of the Purchase and Sale 
    Agreement.

Miscellaneous:

    (a)  Except as modified herein, the Purchase and Sale Agreement remains in
full force and effect and is hereby ratified by Buyer and Seller.

    (b)  The later of the Buyer's signature date and the Seller's signature
date, set forth below, shall be the "Effective Date" of this Amendment.

    BUYER:    EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN, a Washington corporation


              By:   /s/ David J. Heerensperger
                    ---------------------------------------
                    David J. Heerensperger
              Its:  Chairman of the Board

              Date: August 26, 1996
                    ---------------------------------------


    SELLER:   TERRACE POINT PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado general partnership


              By:   /s/ Daryll Propp
                    ---------------------------------------
                    Daryll Propp
              Its:  General Partner

              Date: 8-27-96
                    ---------------------------------------
Orenthel James FORTSON, Appellant Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0205

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1545 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1545

To ensure that after a declaration of a major disaster affected States, 
  local governments, and Indian tribal governments receive immediate 
approval for services and assistance provided under section 416 of the 
    Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2021

  Mr. Cardenas (for himself, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Blunt Rochester, and Mr. 
    Trone) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure that after a declaration of a major disaster affected States, 
  local governments, and Indian tribal governments receive immediate 
approval for services and assistance provided under section 416 of the 
    Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crisis Counseling Act''.

SEC. 2. CRISIS COUNSELING ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING.

    After the President declares a major disaster under section 401 of 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Assistance and Emergency Response Act 
(42 U.S.C. 5170b), any request made by a State, local, or Indian tribal 
government affected by such disaster shall receive immediate approval 
for services and assistance provided under section 416 of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Chester Lambert LILLEY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carlton JOYNER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 17-6033

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 27, 2017

Decided: July 31, 2017

Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chester Lambert Lilley, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *see Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595.

*146We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lilley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Lilley’s motions for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Megan STEIGERWALD, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0075

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 01, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Cedric SHEFFIELD, et al., Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0921, 2D18-1153

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 02, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
ZUCKERT SCOUIT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

888 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 2()()()6...3309 

Telephone [202]298-8660 Fax [202]342-0683 

www.zsrlaw.corn 

RICHARD D. MATHIAS DIRECT DIAL (202) 973-79 I 7 

rdmathias@zsrlaw.com 

September 1, 2011 

BY ELECTRONIC FILING 

George Wellington, Chief 

Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division (X-45) 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Polling Results, Application of Aerovias del Continente 

Americano S.A. (Docket OST-2011-0166) 

Dear Mr. Wellington: 

' ,-) 

cr 

This is to advise that Aero vias del Continente Americana S.A. ("A vianca") has 

completed polling of carriers on the service list of A vianca' s August 30, 2011 Application for a 

Statement of Authorization. 

No objections were received. Accordingly, Avianca urges that the requested authority be 

granted as soon as possible. 

Sincerely, 

Richard D. Mathias 

Counsel for Aerovias del Continente 

Americana S.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          76,858
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     11,973,767
<ALLOWANCE>                                    248,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,722,965
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            730,297
<LONG-TERM>                                 10,289,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          111,550
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           648
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,591,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              12,722,965
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                887,609
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               420,478
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          413,750
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   52,050
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                183,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                262,688
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,625
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.3
<LOANS-NON>                                    285,454
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               207,618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   42,183
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,598
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              248,290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6946

HAYWOOD L. PEELE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; RANDALL LEE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-108-5-F)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: November 3, 1999

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood L. Peele, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Haywood L. Peele seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Peele v. Jarvis, No. CA-98-108-5-F

(E.D.N.C. June 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Qualo Martez LOWERY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-6090

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 31, 2017

Qualo Martez Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Kevin Zolot, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qualo Martez Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction motion to dismiss both the indictment and the information filed by the Government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lowery’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Lowery,*No. 3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41611 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. OMAR ALEJANDRO PORTILLO

- RUIZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CR

- 81

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Omar Alejandro Portillo

- Ruiz appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846

. He argues that there is a conflict between the special conditions of supervised release that were imposed during the oral pronouncement of his sentence and those that were impo sed by the written judgment

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 20, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41611 Document: 00513684696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2016No. 15

- 41611

2 As part of the plea agreement, Portillo

- Ruiz agreed to waive his right to appeal his conviction and sentence except with respect to a n imprisonment term that exceeded the statutory maximum and with respect to a claim of inef fective assistance of counsel. Portillo

- Ruiz argues that this appeal of his sentence is not precluded by his appeal waiver because the plea agreement was of no benefit to him and contains illegal provisions. He contends that the plea agreement is therefore unenforceable. Portillo

- Ruiz did not challenge the validity of the plea agreement in the district court or attempt to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that the plea agreement lacked consideration. He cannot establish that the district court plainly erred i n accepting the plea agreement as we have never expressly held t hat consideration is required to support a valid plea agreement. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); United States v. Smallwood , 920 F.2d 1231, 1239

- 40 (5th Cir. 1991). Moreover, the record demonstrates no reversible plain error with respect to the consideration given by the Government for Po rtillo

- Ruiz’s plea agreement. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135. Thus, t he appeal waiver in Portillo

- Ruiz’s plea agreement bars his challenge to a ny disparity between the oral sentence and the written judgment. See United States v. Higgins , 739 F.3d 733, 738

- 39 (5th Cir. 2014)

. T he judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance and its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief are DENIED. Case: 15-41611 Document: 00513684696 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/20/2016
Michael J. LENTON, Appellant, v. Rhonda Michele PARKER, Appellee.

No. 1D16-3256

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2018

Michael J. Lenton, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and MAKAR and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
Anthony Q. LAWRENCE v. STATE

CR-15-0403

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

January 20, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Reh. denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-539-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.                

*Description:*                     Compliance filing: TETLP Ministerial Compliance Filing RP21-1001-000 to be effective 9/1/2021.                

*Filed Date:*                     2/4/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220204-5199.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 2/16/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: February 7, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-02958 Filed 2-10-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
----

----

| I consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of New Gold Inc., which is being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of reference to my name in connection with, and to the use of information derived from, the technical report entitled “Blackwater Gold Project, British Columbia, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Feasibility Study” effective date January 14, 2014, included in the Annual Information Form of New Gold Inc. for the financial year ended December 31, 2013, and I consent to the incorporation by reference of such information in the registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-160500) of New Gold Inc. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | “Ronald Simpson” |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Ronald G. Simpson            |   |
| Title: | Professional Geoscientist    |   |
|   | GeoSim Services Inc.         |   |

----

----
STATE of Louisiana v. Cameron Kinte MAYS

NO. 2017-KO-1640

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 2018

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2


             Principal Financial Officer's Certification Pursuant To

                                  Section 1350
                             (Furnished, not filed)

In connection with the Annual Report of Tasker Capital Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur P. Bergeron,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Arthur P. Bergeron
----------------------
Arthur P. Bergeron
Chief Financial Officer