7106 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020, 86 FR 43185 (August 6, 2021) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2 In the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation 

of the AD order, we collapsed Prosperity, Yieh 

Phui, and Synn and treated them as a single entity. 

See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 FR 35313 (June 

2, 2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 3 (Taiwan CORE LTFV 

Final), unchanged in Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from India, Italy, the People’s 

Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and 

Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determination for India and Taiwan, and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 48390 (July 25, 

2016) (Order). In the first administrative review, we 

determined to no longer collapse Prosperity with 

YP and Synn, but we continued to collapse YP and 

Synn and treated them as a single entity. See 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 83 FR 39679 (August 10, 2018), unchanged 

in Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 64527 

(December 17, 2018), amended by Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 

Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 5991 

(February 25, 2019). We selected the YP/Synn 

entity as a single combined respondent and treated 

it as such in the pre-preliminary phase of this 

review. Subsequently, in the immediately preceding 

administrative review of this case, we determined 

that YP and Synn should no longer be collapsed. 

See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 85 FR 

74669 (November 23, 2020), unchanged in Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 

Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final Determination of 

No Shipments; 2018–2019, 86 FR 28554 (May 27, 

2021). As the instant record mirrors that of the 

preceding review with respect to this issue, and we 

have received no comments contesting the 

determination not to collapse the YP/Synn entity, 

we continue to determine that YP and Synn should 

not be collapsed in this review. 

3See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Petitioners’ 

Case Brief’’ dated December 8, 2021 (Petitioners’ 

Case Brief); Yieh Phui’s Letter, ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from Taiwan; Case Brief,’’ dated 

December 8, 2021 (Yieh Phui’s Case Brief); and 

Prosperity’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from Taiwan, Case No. A–583- 856: 

Prosperity Tieh’s Case Brief,’’ dated December 8, 

2021 (Prosperity’s Case Brief). 

4See Yieh Phui’s Letter, ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from Taiwan; Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

December 15, 2021; see also Petitioners’ Letter, 

‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

December 15, 2021 (Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant 

Steel Products from Taiwan: Extension of Time 

Limit for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 2019–2020,’’ dated 

November 19, 2021. 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate published 

for the most recent period; (3) for all 

China exporters of subject merchandise 

that have not been found to be entitled 

to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate previously established 

for the China-wide entity, which is 

154.07 percent; and (4) for all non-China 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the China exporter that 

supplied that non-China exporter. The 

cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing these final results of 

administrative review and publishing 

this notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: January 31, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of Issues 

Comment 1: The Separate Rate 

Comment 2: No Shipments for Deosen 

Biochemical Ltd. 

Comment 3: Ministerial Errors in the 

Calculation of Fufeng’s Margin 

Comment 4: Total Adverse Facts Available 

(AFA) for Meihua 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02557 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–856] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From Taiwan: Final Results 

of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers/ 

exporters subject to this review made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value (NV) during the period of 

review (POR) July 1, 2019, through June 

30, 2020. We further determine that 

Synn Co., Ltd. (Synn) had no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable February 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate 

Sliney or Matthew Palmer, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2437 or (202) 482–1678, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results for 

this administrative review.1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. This review covers 

two mandatory respondents: Prosperity 

Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Prosperity) 

and Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh 

Phui).2 We received case briefs from AK 

Steel Corporation, California Steel 

Industries, and Steel Dynamics, Inc. 

(collectively, the petitioners), Yieh Phui, 

and Prosperity.3 We received rebuttal 

briefs from Yieh Phui and the 

petitioners.4 On November 19, 2021, we 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of this review to February 2, 

2022.5 A complete summary of the 

events that occurred since publication 

of the Preliminary Results is found in 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 7107 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 7For the full text of the scope of the Order, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 8See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 9See Preliminary Results, 86 FR 43185–86. 

10See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews 

in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 16. 

11 In the case of two mandatory respondents, our 

practice is to calculate: (A) A weighted average of 

the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory 

respondents; (B) a simple average of the dumping 

margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; 

and (C) a weighted average of the dumping margins 

calculated for the mandatory respondents using 

each company’s publicly ranged values for the 

merchandise under consideration. We compare (B) 

and (C) to (A) and select the rate closest to (A) as 

the most appropriate rate for all other companies. 

See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 

2016, 82 FR 31555, 31556 (July 7, 2017). We have 

applied that practice here. See Memorandum, 

‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan: Calculation of All-Others’ 

Rate in Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

flat-rolled steel products, either clad, 

plated, or coated with corrosionresistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, 

or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or ironbased alloys, whether or not corrugated 

or painted, varnished, laminated, or 

coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances in addition to the 

metallic coating. The subject 

merchandise is currently classifiable 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings: 7210.30.0030, 

7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 

7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 

7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 

7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 

7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 

7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 

7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 

7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 

7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 

7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 

7212.60.0000. The products subject to 

the orders may also enter under the 

following HTSUS item numbers: 

7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 

7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 

7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 

7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 

7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 

7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 

7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 

7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 

7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 

7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The 

HTSUS subheadings above are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only. The written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive.7

Analysis of the Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to this review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.8 A list of the issues 

which parties raised, and to which we 

respond in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, is attached in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

analysis of the comments received from 

interested parties, we made no changes 

to the preliminary weighted-average 

margin calculation for Prosperity, and 

we made two changes to the preliminary 

weighted-average margin calculation for 

Yieh Phui. For detailed information, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

preliminarily determined that Synn 

made no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.9 As we 

have not received any information to 

contradict this determination, nor 

comment in opposition to our 

preliminary finding, we continue to 

determine that Synn made no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR. 

Consistent with our practice, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 

existing entries of subject merchandise 

produced by Synn, but exported by 

other parties, at the rate for the 

intermediate reseller, if available, or at 

the all-others rate. 

Rate for Respondent Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

individual respondents not selected for 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

respondents which we did not examine 

in an administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act establishes a 

preference to avoid using rates which 

are zero, de minimis, or based entirely 

on facts available (FA) in calculating an 

all others rate. Accordingly, Commerce’s 

practice in administrative reviews has 

been to average the weighted-average 

dumping margins for the companies 

selected for individual examination in 

the administrative review, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on FA.10 For these final results 

of review, we calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin for both 

mandatory respondents which is not 

zero, de minimis, or determined entirely 

on the basis of FA.11 Accordingly, 

Commerce assigns to the company not 

examined in this review (i.e., Sheng Yu 

Steel Co., Ltd.) a dumping margin of 

3.10 percent, which is the weighted 

average of the dumping margins 

calculated using the public ranged sales 

data of Prosperity and Yieh Phui. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average dumping margins 

exist for the respondents for the period 

July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., 

Ltd ........................................... 3.63 

Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd ............ 3.10 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd ..... 2.05 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose to interested 

parties the calculations and analysis 

performed for these final results within 

five days of the date of the publication 

of this notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7108 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2022 / Notices 

12 In these final results, Commerce applied the 

assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

13See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

14See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

with Final Determination of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation and Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Investigation, 84 FR 6129 

(February 26, 2019) (Amended Final 

Determination). 

1See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Sodium Nitrite from 

India and Russia: Antidumping and Countervailing 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we calculated 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the examined sales to the total 

entered value of those sales. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.12 For entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by the mandatory respondents 

for which they did not know their 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, or for entries associated 

with Synn, who had no shipments 

during the POR, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. 

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.13

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed above will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior completed segment of 

the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer has been covered in a prior 

complete segment of this proceeding, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

period for the producer of the 

merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate 

for all other manufacturers or exporters 

will continue to be 3.66 percent,14 the 

all-others rate from the Amended Final 

Determination. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: February 2, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Yieh Phui’s Reported 

Cost Information is Reliable and Whether 

an Adverse Inference or Adjustment is 

Appropriate 

Comment 2: Whether To Modify the 

Transfer Price Cost Adjustment for 

Inputs Sourced From Yieh Phui’s 

Affiliated Suppliers 

Comment 3: Whether To Include Various 

Income Items as Allowable Offsets in the 

Calculation of Yieh Phui’s General and 

Administrative Expense Ratio 

Comment 4: Treatment of Section 232 

Duties 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–02640 Filed 2–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–907, C–821–837] 

Sodium Nitrite From India and the 

Russian Federation: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable February 2, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ariela Garvett at (202) 482–3609, Eva 

Kim at (202) 482–8283, and Thomas 

Martin at (202) 482–3936 (India), and 

Melissa Kinter at (202) 482–1413 (the 

Russian Federation (Russia)), AD/CVD 

Operations, Offices IV and II, 

respectively, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petitions 

On January 13, 2022, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) received 

countervailing duty (CVD) petitions 

concerning imports of sodium nitrite 

from India and Russia, filed in proper 

form on behalf of Chemtrade Chemicals 

US, LLC (the petitioner), a domestic 

producer of sodium nitrite.1 The 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES