alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ReGen
Biologics, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(e) and 15d  15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2003

By:
    
    /s/ GERALD E. BISBEE, JR.Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr.President andChief Executive Officer
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0705 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 052 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Brion Umidi, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of ReGen Biologics, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and15d — 15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 20, 2006         By:                     /s/ BRION UMIDI    Name:  Brion Umidi    Title:  *Chief Financial Officer*
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Aco-loo 

^ 

Northwest Airlines, Inc., Delta Airlines, Inc. 

AirTran Airways Inc., Continental Airlines, 

Inc., 

Southwest Airlines, Inc. 

Complainants / Appellees 

Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis 

International Airport, BAA-Indianapolis 

Respondents / Appellants 

CO 

m 

O J CO 

Docket No. 16-0V^04 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pxirsuant 

to the Rules of Practice, Section 16.11(a), the date by which the Final Agency Decision 

will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to March 3, 2009. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination 

in this case. 

^^• ^ 

Catherine Lang 

Acting Associate A' 

for Airports 

Jo^ h i 

/Date ' 

trator 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

FEB 5 20C9 

1 HEREBY CERTIFY that on , I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension 

of Time addressed to: 

For Complainants 

Robert E. Cohn 

Jonathan L. Abram 

Patrick R. Rizzi 

HOGAN & HARTSON, L.L.P. 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Brian Mattingly, 

Regional Director Airport Affairs 

Gary Bunce, 

Assistant General Counsel 

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

2700 Lone Oak Parkway 

Eagan,MN 55121 

Joseph Zang 

Assistant General Counsel 

Rebecca Bays, 

General Attorney 

DELTA AIR LINES INC 

1030 Delta Boulevard 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

Richard P. Magurno 

Senior Vice President & General Counsel 

AIR TRAN AIRWAYS, INC 

9955 AirTran Boulevard 

Orlanda, FA 32827 

Lorraine B. Halloway 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Peimsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Counsel for Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Robert W. Kneisley 

Associate General Counsel 

Leslie Abbott 

Attorney 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. 

1901 L Street, NW, Suite 640 

Washington, DC 20036 

Thomas Newton Boiling 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC 

P.O. Box 4607 - HQSLG 

Houston, TX 77210 
For Respondents 

Pablo O. Nuesch 

Jeffrey A. Schwarz 

SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Robert A. Duncan 

Airport Director 

Indianapolis Airport Authority 

Indianapolis International Airport 

2500 South High School Road, Suite 100 

Indianapolis, IN 46241-4943 

Copy to FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

/§>-M^ 

NflTita B^ght 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations
Stephan W. CARTER, Appellant, v. COMMISSION ON ETHICS, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1141

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed February 27, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1365

 To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 
statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2021

Ms. Norton (for herself, Mr. Carson, and Mr. Lowenthal) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 
statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Andrew Jackson Statue Removal Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ANDREW JACKSON STATUE.

    (a) Removal.--The Secretary of the Interior shall ensure that the 
Andrew Jackson statue and marble base is removed from Lafayette Square 
in the District of Columbia.
    (b) Donation.--The Secretary shall donate the Andrew Jackson statue 
and marble base to a museum or other similar entity. The recipient of 
the statue and base may not store, display, or exhibit the statue 
outside. If the statue is stored, displayed, or exhibited outside, 
ownership of the statue and marble base will revert back to the Federal 
Government.
                                 <all>
```
Wilman R. COLLANDO PENA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D18-0530

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 13, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Michael L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-861

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[April 19, 2018]

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
1 Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Faulk, Scott (OST)

Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:10 AM

To: Gene Bieker (gbieker@cityofclovis.org)

Cc: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Subject: Request for Community Comments

Attachments: Boutique.pdf; SeaPort.pdf

Dear Gene:

I would like to update you on the Essen tial Air Service situ ation at Clovis and give you an opportunity to submi t any comments for the record if you wish. In response to the notice of Great Lake s Aviation, Ltd., to terminate its scheduled air transportation serv ice at Clovis, the Department i ssued Order 2014-1-10, on January 14, 2014, to solicit proposals from all interested air carriers to provide se rvice at Clovis. In re sponse to that Order, we received proposals from the Boutique Air, Inc. and SeaPort Airlines, Inc.

Copies of those proposals are atta ched and may be accessed online through the Department’s Dockets Management System at: http://www.regulations.gov/ by entering “DOT-OST-1996-1902” in the “Ente r Keyword or ID” field, so we will only briefly summarize the proposals here.

Boutique Air, Inc. proposed 24 week ly nonstop round trips between Clovis and Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport utilizing a 9-seat Pilatus PC-12 aircraft , at a requested annual subsidy rate of $3,888,274.

SeaPort Airlines, Inc. proposed 12 weekly nonstop round trip s between Clovis and Da llas Love Field Airpor t utilizing a 9-seat Cessna Grand Caravan aircra ft, at a requested annual subsidy rate of $2,813,992.

We want to give you an opportunity to submit any fo rmal comments for the record before we submit a
recommendation to the Assistant Secret ary for Aviation and International A ffairs. We request that you submi t any comments you may have as soon as possible, but in any case no later than March 20, 2014. We will carefully consider your comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a decision. If you have any questions or if you find that you need additional time to draft your comments, please
let me know.

Please send your comments to me at the following email address: EAS@dot.gov or by fax to 202-366-7838. I f you have any questions, please fe el free to contact me at scott.faulk@dot.gov or 202-366-9967.

Sincerely,

Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
202-366-9721
EX PARTE Robert Wayne KELLEY

CR-16-0233

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 6, 2017 Reh. denied March 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Mand. pet. denied.
#### In the Matter of Susan Tasch, Appellant, v Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

[770 NYS2d 430]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 and Education Law § 3020-a to vacate a determination of an arbitrator dated May 21, 2002, which suspended the petitioner from her duties with the Board of Education of the City of New York for a period of six months without pay, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), entered October 23, 2002, which denied the petition and granted the application to dismiss the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the arbitrator did not exceed his power in concluding that the specifications sufficiently charged behavior which, if proven, would constitute one or more crimes and, therefore, pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a (1), the specifications were not barred by the three-year statute of limitations. It was neither arbitrary nor capricious for the arbitrator to determine that certain language in the specifications satisfied the element of benefit, required in order to sufficiently charge official misconduct *(see*Penal Law 195.00 [1]; *cf. Matter of Aronsky v Board of Educ., Community*
      *503
      *School Dist. No. 22 of City of N.Y.,*75 NY2d 997, 1000 [1990]). This determination alone was sufficient to take the charge out of the three-year statute of limitations. Therefore it is unnecessary to reach the petitioner’s other arguments relating to the crime of conspiracy in the sixth degree *(see*Penal Law § 105.00).

In view of the degree of deference accorded the arbitrator in matters of credibility, the Supreme Court properly accepted the arbitrator’s credibility determinations, even though the evidence was conflicting and room for choice existed *(see Matter of Collins v Codd,*38 NY2d 269, 270-271 [1976]; *see also Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,*70 NY2d 436, 443 [1987]; *Matter of Stork Rest. v Boland,*282 NY 256, 267 [1940]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.
Mark CHERRY and Audra Cherry, Appellants, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellee.

No. 3D16-1869

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 29, 2017.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
Larry Alphonso JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Drew JOHNSON, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-2198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

OCTOBER 24, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
Order entered July 2 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 21
- 00070
- CV FLASHDANCER, INC. , Appellant
V.
JOHN FULCHER III , Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judici al District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 11379
O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this appeal is past due. By postcard dated April 20,
2021 , we notified the Vielica Do bbins, O fficial Court Report er for the 193 rd Judicial Distri ct Co urt , tha t the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the report er’s record withi n t hirty days. After Ms. Dobbins responded that the reporter ’ s record had not been filed because the record had not been requested nor payment arrangements made , we not ified appella nt

. On April 30, 2021, appellant responded that it had attempted to obtain information regarding the cos t of therecord , and it was ready to pay for the record. By order dated Ma y 5, 2021, we again notified Ms. Dobbins that the repor ter’s record was o verdue , dir ected her to the January 15, 2021 request fo r the r eporter ’ s record contained in the clerk ’ s record, and orde red her to file the reporter ’ s record within thirty days. To d ate, the reporter ’ s record has not been filed and Ms. Dobbins has not otherwise communica ted with the Court regarding the reporte r ’ s reco rd. Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins to file, wi thin T WENTY DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; or ( 2 ) written v erification that appel lant has been n otified of the c ost of the record and has not yet paid for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record

. W e notif y appellant that if we
receive verification it has been notified o f the cos t for the reporter’s record and has not pai d for or made arran gements to pay for the reporter’s re cord , we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).
W e expressly CAUTION Ms. Dobbins that failure to comply with this order
WILL result in the Court t aking such action a s is necessary to have Ms. Dobbins

c omply with the Court’s orders, including an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she comp lie s. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to: Honorable Bridgett N. Whitmore Presiding Judge134th Judici al District Court Vielica Dobbins Official Court Reporter 134th Judicial District Court
A ll parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Nicholas WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-4903

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed April 18, 2018.

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
RARE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 28,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                           6,832
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,482
<PP&E>                                         169,686<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,351
<BONDS>                                         51,706
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,176
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,460
<SALES>                                         92,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,979
<CGS>                                           33,377
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,075
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,173
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,587
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,586
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<FN>
<F1>ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>
        
  

</TABLE>