alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of First Data Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Kimberly S. Patmore, the Chief Financial Officer of First Data Corporation, certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Data Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kimberly S. Patmore
|                     |  |  |  | Kimberly S. Patmore    
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-127579, No. 333-52730 and No. 333-54880) ofResources Connection, Inc. of our report dated August 7, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

 

Orange County, California 

August 8, 2006
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1497 

To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to require funds deposited 

by check from the Federal Government to be made available immediately. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2021 

Mr. FOSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to require 

funds deposited by check from the Federal Government 

to be made available immediately. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS IN CONNECTION 

4 WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CHECKS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 603(a) of the Expedited 

6 Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘NEXT BUSI8 NESS DAY’’; 

9 (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as para10 graph (3); 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1497 IH

1 (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(2) GOVERNMENT CHECKS.—Funds deposited 

4 in an account at a depository institution by check 

5 shall be available for withdrawal immediately in the 

6 case of a check which— 

7 ‘‘(A) is drawn on the Treasury of the 

8 United States; and 

9 ‘‘(B) is endorsed only by the person to 

10 whom it was issued.’’; and 

11 (4) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated— 

12 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘GOVERN13 MENT CHECKS; CERTAIN’’ and inserting ‘‘CER14 TAIN’’; 

15 (B) by striking subparagraph (A); and 

16 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

17 through (F) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), 

18 respectively. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The Expedited 

20 Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) is amend21 ed— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘subsections (a)(2)’’ each place 

23 such term appears and inserting ‘‘subsections (a)(2), 

24 (a)(3)’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1497 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘in subsection (a)(2)’’ each 

2 place such term appears and inserting ‘‘in paragraph 

3 (2) or (3) of subsection (a)’’; 

4 (3) in section 603— 

5 (A) in subsection (b)(3)(C), by striking 

6 ‘‘subsection (a)(2)(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub7 section (a)(3)(C)’’; and 

8 (B) in subsection (c)(1)(B)(iii), by striking 

9 ‘‘subsection (a)(2)(D)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub10 section (a)(3)(C)’’; and 

11 (4) in section 604— 

12 (A) in subsection (a)(1)(D), by striking 

13 ‘‘subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 

14 603(a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 603(a)(2) or 

15 subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 603(a)(3)’’; 

16 and 

17 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘sub18 section (a)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(2), 

19 (a)(3)’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
NaviSite, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos.
333-89987, 333-67786, 333-67774, 333-56454, 333-56452 and 333-56478 on Form S-8
of NaviSite, Inc. of our report dated October 21, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of NaviSite, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31,
2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in
the three-year period ended July 31, 2003, and our report dated October 21, 2003
relating to the consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports are
included in the July 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaviSite, Inc.

     The reports of KPMG LLP on the aforementioned consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule contain an explanatory paragraph
that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations
since inception and has an accumulated deficit, as well as other factors, that
raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 21, 2003
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3042

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Fredrick Perkins lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Western

____________ Submitted: May 9, 2022 Filed: June 22, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Fredrick Perkins entered into a plea agreement with the government, under which Perkins agreed to plead guilty to one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). The parties agreed that Perkins was a career offender under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, see U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a)(1)–(3) and (c)(1); that his Guidelines sentencingrange was 262 to 327 months’ imprisonment; and that a 165-month sentence should

be imposed. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C). Perkins also waived his right to appeal. The district court 1 accepted the guilty plea. Perkins thereafter alternatively moved to withdraw the guilty plea or for rejection of the plea agreement. The district court denied the motion and imposed the agreed-upon sentence. Perkins contends that the district court erred in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that his Illinois convictions were expunged under Illinois law and therefore should not have been considered in determining his career offender status or his criminal history category. We do not reach the merits of this argument, however, because we conclude that Perkins has waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (appeal waiver requires dismissal “if the plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, and if dismissal of the appeal would not result in a miscarriage of justice”). Moreover, despite Perkins’s argument to the contrary, enforcing the waiver does not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 891 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver not enforced if doing so “would result in a miscarriage of justice”). Perkins’s sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum nor is it otherwise legally or constitutionally invalid. See id. at 891–92 (illegal sentence constitutes a miscarriage of justice). The appeal is dismissed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Leonard T. Strand, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
Timothy Mark GRIFFIN v. STATE

CR-15-0716

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

February 3, 2017 Reh. denied March 17, 2017

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Affirmed.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Laura Kathryn Benson, * From the 39th District

 Court of Haskell County,

 Trial Court No. 6495.

Vs. No. 11-12-00125-CR * May 22, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Jaquaries JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4338

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed June 15, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brittany N. O'Neil, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. However, we remand for the trial court to enter corrected sentencing documents granting Appellant a twenty-year sentencing review pursuant to *1015section 921.1402(2)(d), Florida Statutes (2016). *See**Barnes v. State* , 175 So.3d 380 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

TORPY, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Chyvas Ariel PEOPLES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0454

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Denied.
NUMBER 13-16-00293-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

G. T. LEACH BUILDERS, L.L.C.-RESIDENTIAL, 

G. T. LEACH CONSTRUCTION, L.P.,

AND GARY T. LEACH, Appellants,

v.

SAPPHIRE CONDOMINIUMS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellants, G. T. Leach Builders, L.L.C.-Residential, G. T. Leach Construction, 

L.P., and Gary T. Leach, have filed a “Motion for Stay Pending Accelerated Appeal, and 

Alternatively, Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Enforce Mandatory Statutory Stay.” 

Appellants have appealed a May 19, 2016 order denying their application to compel 
2

arbitration under Chapter 171 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See 

TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 171.021, .025 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). 

Appellants seek an order staying the underlying litigation pending resolution of this 

appeal under section 171.025 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and 

various provisions of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. § 171.025; TEX.

R. APP. P. 29.3, 29.5, 29.6. According to appellants, requiring them to participate in 

discovery on the merits, pretrial preparation and a trial of potentially arbitrable issues 

while their appeal is pending would impair or render moot the effectiveness of the relief 

sought through the appeal. 

Having reviewed and fully considered appellants’ motion, we GRANT the motion

in part, DENY it in part, and DISMISS it in part. We GRANT the motion insofar as we 

order the trial court proceedings STAYED pending further order of this Court. We 

DENY the motion insofar as appellants request that we stay the litigation pending 

resolution of any future appeal in the Texas Supreme Court. We DISMISS the motion 

as moot insofar as we are addressing appellants’ motion through this pending 

interlocutory appeal, and thus the requested alternative relief of a petition for writ of 

mandamus is moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM 

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of June, 2016.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Continental Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Hal M.
Brown, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael A. Reynolds, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Hal M. Brown
            /s/ Michael A. ReynoldsHal
      M. Brown
            Michael
      A. ReynoldsChief
      Executive Officer
            Chief
      Financial Officer





Dated:  March
15, 2010
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0747

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: SH AWN M. STUTZMAN,

Petitioner and Appellee, and KRIS STUTZMAN,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_ ________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Kris Stutzman, to all counsel of r ecord , and to the Honorable John Mercer , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 14 2024

08/14/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0747
Sandra Epperson RICH, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. John D. RICH, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D18-0320

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 22, 2018

**DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION**

Dismissed.
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March                  14, 2007 | /s/                  Richard R.                  Ivanovick                      |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Richard                  R. Ivanovick                                                                                                                                                    |
|                            | Chief                  Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                 |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 132 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 132

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2021

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 
     date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Prison Bureau Nonviolent 
Offender Relief Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OFFENDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3624 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``at the early release 
        date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, or otherwise'' 
        after ``A prisoner shall be released by the Bureau of 
        Prisons''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Early Release for Certain Nonviolent Offenders.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Bureau of Prisons, 
pursuant to a good time policy, shall release from confinement a 
prisoner who has served one half or more of his term of imprisonment 
(including any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) if that 
prisoner--
            ``(1) has attained the age of 45 years;
            ``(2) has never been convicted of a crime of violence; and
            ``(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving violent 
        conduct, of institutional disciplinary regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Felicia TUITAMA, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, a corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-55650

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 14, 2017 *

Filed February 23, 2017

Felicia Tuitama, Pro Se

Derek Weisbender, .Esquire, Attorney, Green *&*Hall, LLP, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendants-Appellees Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, U.S. Bank NA

Edward A. Treder, Attorney, Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder *&*Weiss LLP, Diamond Bar, CA, for Defendant-Appellee Sage Point Lender Services, LLC

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Felicia Tuitama appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her diversity action alleging state law claims related to the foreclosure of her property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a motion to remand. *Hamilton Materials,**539*Inc. v. Dow Chemical Corp.,*494 F.3d 1203, 1206 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.

The district court properly concluded that defendants’ removal of Tuitama’s state law action was timely because it was filed within 30 days after defendant Sage Point Lender Services, LLP became a nominal defendant and thus rendered this action removable. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(3) (“[I]f the case stated by the initial pleading is not removable, a notice of removal may be filed within 30 days after receipt by the defendant ... of a copy of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained that the case is one which is or has become removable.”); *see also Bates v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc.,*694 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[C]ourts must disregard nominal or formal parties and rest jurisdiction only upon the citizenship of real parties to the controversy.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Contrary to Tuitama’s contention, raised for the first time in her reply brief, complete diversity exists over this action. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1); *see also In re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litig.,*549 F.3d 1223, 1234 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties—each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”). That Tuitama’s husband—who Tuitama now claims is an indispensable party—is, like her, a citizen of Georgia, is irrelevant for purposes of determining whether complete diversity exists.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 10.01

October 17, 2000

Doug
Holden
1196 Eagle Valley Court
San Jose, CA 95120

Dear
Doug,

On
behalf of Zamba, I am both extremely pleased and excited to offer you an opportunity to join us as President and Chief Executive Officer, reporting to the Board of Directors. You
would be based in our Campbell, California office.

We
would like to offer you an exempt, full time position, which includes:



This
offer is contingent upon your executing the attached employment agreement before commencing your employment, the successful completion of your reference and background
investigation, and compliance with the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). Also, if you are not a U.S. citizen, U.S. permanent resident, nor been granted asylee or refugee status, this
offer is contingent upon your ability to meet Zamba's Immigration policy guidelines and INS approval of your right to reside and work in the United States (i.e., approval of appropriate work visa or
status for Zamba, Minneapolis). Should you qualify, Zamba will pay the reasonable and usual costs to obtain the appropriate nonimmigrant classification.

This
offer will remain valid for seven days from the date of this letter unless we notify you otherwise. You should understand that this offer does not constitute a contract of
employment for any specified period of time but will create an "employment at will" relationship.

Please
sign this letter, indicating acceptance of this offer and your anticipated start date. Return the signed copy in the enclosed envelope and keep a copy for your records. Please
review and complete the enclosed forms. Bring these forms and the appropriate I-9 documentation with you on your first day of work. At orientation we will cover your benefits, review your
forms and answer any questions you may have.

---

Doug, we believe that you will find Zamba a truly exciting and fulfilling place to work. We look forward to your joining us and contributing to our success.

Sincerely,

/s/
Paul Edelhertz

Paul
Edelhertz
Chairman of the Board of Directors

I
accept this offer:

|                |  |         
|--------------- |  | --------
|/s/ Doug Holden |  | 10/17/00
|NAME            |  | Date    

Anticipated
Start Date: 10/17/00

ENCL:



---